EXPOSED: The Federal Plan to Destroy the Right Wing | Ep 120
The federal government is headed down a slippery slope to marginalize any right-wing person it sees as a “threat” even though it is not able to define what those characteristics are. President Biden fully supports this motion by Congress to begin a siege on our civil liberties and take down the political opposition. But it’s not just the government. Big Tech monopolies and the media are all working together to destroy everyone who supported Trump, and their plan is being exposed.
The events that happened on January 6th in Washington, D.C. were more than a shot that was heard around the world.
The events that we witnessed as a country, the events that I witnessed personally that risked my life and even my reputation, a document, seemed to be haphazard and something random.
It turns out, though, that these events were not a failed revolution or coup that happened by accident.
In fact, according to the FBI, a report from the Washington Post says that the FBI reported that they were warned of a war at the Capitol contradicting claims there was no indication of looming violence.
And of course, with this event being, I would say, allowed to occur, or even at the minimum, saying that it was not prevented from happening when there was ample warning.
And we're going to get into that a lot later.
The events that happened, the damage, the violence, the destruction, and the outcry from the country is now being used to wage a strategic war, not on those who committed the crimes inside the Capitol and on its steps, but to now wage a war on the average American citizen, specifically those who are Christian, Republican, libertarian, right-wing in general, and yes, I might even say patriotic white men in particular.
I have evidence to back this up.
What we are going to break into may alarm some of you guys, and it should, including a new bill that's being introduced to legalize spying on political opponents.
They're going to take what happened in 9-11 and the way that we got the Patriot Act and FISA courts in this massive police state a step further.
And we might not be able to stop them, but at least we can be informed.
That's what we always want to do here.
Welcome back to slightly offensive.
You guys, this is the best worst show on Blaze TV or the worst best show.
As I tell you, your guys' sponsorship brings beautiful set like this, amazing graphics.
I'm always joined by the lovely producer, Mrs. or Miss.
No, shocker.
There's not a Mrs. Yet.
Miss Savannah Hernandez.
We're back.
We're here.
We're back.
We're better than ever.
We're ready to get into all of this crazy news with you guys.
Yeah, and I was alarmed.
A lot of you were too.
Where's Madison?
Where is Madison?
Oh, there she is.
Okay, she's back, guys.
And I want to let you know.
You know, we got our new non-binary Barbie as part of the Diversity Coalition.
You remember?
We're not going to say yet, but we're going to release, we had a vote on the last episode of what to name the new member of the Diversity Coalition.
And you guys voted, and we're going to go ahead and bring it up at the end of the show.
So please stay tuned for the new name of our newest member.
As we jump into today, I also want to remind you guys that this is an audio-only podcast.
Please, whatever you're doing, stop right now.
Click the links below and leave us a five-star review if you can.
I know it doesn't cost you anything.
It's free.
It helps us out a lot, especially as we've been completely demonetized here on YouTube.
They've taken away monetization mostly on Facebook.
And they've come after a lot more than just that.
So please click the links below, subscribe to the audio-only podcast.
It helps us out a lot.
Or you can take it a step further.
Go to blazetv.com slash Elijah right now.
And you can use my code to get $30 off a subscription.
The reason why it's important that you support us at Blazetv.com is simply because we cannot get deplatformed there.
And the Blaze has made a years-long commitment to this show to continue to finance it, to continue to fund it.
And so as you support them, that supports us directly in all of our reporting.
And when I can for sure fly again, I'll be back out on the field very shortly.
Savannah, we will be back out, right?
Yes, we will.
And we are both very excited about the moment we can finally be back out reporting you guys.
Yes.
Until then, guys, let's jump into the stories for today.
So this war is starting in a psyop collusion between the media, big tech companies, and the government.
Now, what we are seeing is a trifecta holy union, which I'm going to give Jim Acosta some credit.
Let's pull this article up, which he's calling the disinformation industrial complex.
Now, the disinformation industrial complex is a term we're going to be using here going forward.
And it's important because it was invented by literally the people who are the disinformation industrial complex, CNN itself.
And what it's happening is, is that there is a new narrative that's being created to actually create disinformation and label those people like myself in the alternative media as enemies of the people because we are trying to expose the evil and the fraud and the lies that are coming out of these elitists who are controlling our country.
And so what's happening is, is that there is this gaslighting and this nurturing of our society to try to prepare people to make one half of the country their enemy.
And there's this plan that is even taking roots legally to demonize all Trump supporters, period, to the point where they want to make it illegal, and I promise you this, illegal to wear MAGA material as MAGA material and MAGA meetups, et cetera, are going to be deemed as a threat of violence.
They're going to actually make it to the point to where if you are America first or you're patriotic or you believe these things that you could be spied on, possibly investigated.
And eventually I would say that they want you to be jailed.
And I have the evidence for that.
Before we get into this article, I want to give a huge shout out to the sponsor of this show.
Guys, Refuge Medical is not just a medical kit.
You can get a medical kit anywhere, but this is an American-made response kit for any sort of trauma or injuries that you can face on the field.
It is an American-owned, like backed company by some of the coolest guys that I've ever met.
So when all you think about supporting a company, you want to think about who you're supporting.
These people are awesome.
They came in.
They trained myself.
They trained Savannah on how to use medical kits, how to treat our wounds and trauma, how to help people with stab wounds and gunshot wounds.
But guys, I'm going to tell you this bear fact, it's called a bear fact, a first aid kit.
It has tons of items.
In fact, I always forget because there's so many of them, but it has 28 essential components.
There's so many, I even forget.
28 essential components that can help you treat any type of trauma.
You guys, whether it's in your car or car accidents, over 50 people have already died on roads in Texas alone.
We have crazy drivers.
You know that.
Whether it's the uncertainty of the world, whether it's you work a job with your hands and you can get injured or you just have kids and you want to keep them safe.
I'm telling you, do not wait.
Go to refugemedical.com.
Use my code offensive.
And I think right now you can actually 15% off, whatever you want.
So go to refugemedical.com, use my code offensive, get 15% off.
Do not wait till it's too late.
Treat yourself today and get the best fair fact in America.
This is where it's at.
Anyway, let's jump into the story.
So the way that we are being gaslit and watered down to accept the demonization of half of our country is starting in the media.
This article is from the Washington Times.
And it says CNN's Jim Acosta said this, that Trump supporters and Fox News remain a threat to our democracy.
As we talk about this, CNN chief domestic correspondent Jim Acosta said Sunday that conservative media like Fox News and the people who continue to support former President Donald Trump remain a threat to our democracy.
Now, this shouldn't be a shocker to you.
But during an appearance on reliable sources, CNN anchor Brian Stelter, who's famous for looking like an egg, said that the world seems a little bit quiet after Mr. Trump was permanently banned from Twitter.
And he asked Mr. Acosta whether he thought the quiet was temporary.
Before we go any further, Savannah, how surreal does this sound?
Like political opposition is censored and they're like, it seems quiet, a little too quiet.
You're going, yeah, you're literally muzzling and silencing your political opposition to where they don't have a voice at the table.
You know, I always love CNN.
They come forward and they call for Trump to be deplatformed and silenced for the past four years.
And then he is, and they just go, so eerily silent.
There's nothing to report on.
Yeah.
And they're going like, it's like the world's peaceful as in we did a good thing.
And they're gaslighting.
and basically telling people like, look, what censorship is, is actually a good thing.
And that's why when it comes down to this, he goes, I think it's temporary, Mr. Acosta responded.
I mean, and we have it here.
I mean, I do think that this country, what this country faces right now, and you know, I describe it as the disinformation industrial complex.
Here's where you heard it, guys.
You're going to hear a lot about this in the future.
This is going to be used to de-platform and completely silence political opposition further than what's happening today.
And that is Trump and his people conservative outlets like Fox News and then conservative websites and organizations aligned with the president and conservative platforms.
He goes right here to say these three pillars of this disinformation industrial complex, there it is again, reinforcement, essentially helped out put Trump into power, kept him in power, sustained his grip on the Republican Party, and it remains a threat to our democracy, he continued.
It is the reason why there were hundreds of Trump supporters storming the Capitol on January 6th.
And there we have it, guys.
They are using the January 6th event to demonize all conservative, all right-leaning outlets as saying that the reason why this failed insurrection occurred is because of the rhetoric of everybody who holds a different political opinion than the far-left, progressive, global elitist language of CNN.
I mean, this is not just dogma coming from a network or propaganda.
This is straight up a plan to begin a groundwork to make people believe that if opposition was somehow silenced entirely, this country would be a better place.
And not only that, it would have been a better place.
And that if we don't act, and this is what they're actively doing at CNN, they're trying to get Fox News and other outlets like Blaze TV deplatformed.
And you don't, if you want to know how that works, you can get into that on Google or DocDuckGo.
You can search it.
But they're painting this picture that look at what happened if we took Trump.
Now all we need to do is remove everyone associated with what got him there and the world will finally be a good place.
I mean, if this doesn't alarm you, Savannah, I'm starting to feel, I mean, I've been alarmed for a long time, but this is crazy because this is the language of fascists.
Exactly, exactly.
And we've said that since the start, that even Antifa, right?
They use fascism to enact the tactics that they say they're trying to fight, that they're anti-fascist.
And I was talking to you too about George Orwell's 1984, how we're seeing more and more every single day that aspects of this fiction novel are now coming true in terms of our dystopian reality where people are censored.
We're not allowed to have specific opinions, that the state is now weaponizing people's children against them.
We were just reading that article about how this young boy turned his father into the FBI because his father was at the Capitol.
So we're seeing more aspects of this fiction novel come to life.
And it's very terrifying to see because all of these people on the left champion censorship, but they don't realize what they are truly pushing into this country and what they're asking for.
Yeah, I know some people might say it's Maoism too.
It could be Maoism.
It's really hard.
When you get to extreme political ideologies, like extreme left communism and fascism, like the horseshoe effect, they're both kind of similar in the way that they approach this.
It gets worse, though, guys.
Listen to this dehumanizing language.
I know we're not shocked, but he said, until that poison, this is crazy.
Until that poison, that toxin is drained from the national political discourse in this country.
Brian, I do think that these forces represent a potential existential threat to this country and have the potential to come back and cause more suffering in the days to come.
Okay.
Oh, wait, wait, wait.
I'm sorry.
Were they talking about Antifa and BLM who have ravaged our country over the past nine months?
Close.
They're talking about the people that have been exposing the riots for the last few years.
And that's what I want to bring something up very important as we're going to get into this.
As much as you might think this is just rhetoric from CNN, wrong.
It's not just rhetoric from CNN that we're seeing here.
In fact, I do want to bring up something very alarming.
So go to my screen here.
There is a bill that's being introduced called H.R. 350, which is to authorize dedicated domestic terrorism offices within the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity and require the federal government to take steps to prevent domestic terrorism.
Now, this sounds so good on the outside.
And while I get criticized sometimes for the way I frame things, I want to explain to you that in reality, this bill is a political targeting bill that is being introduced by House Democrats in order to weaponize the federal government's ability to use resources to spy on the right wing.
Now, this is not just people in the right wing that maybe are extremists or could pose potential violent threats.
This is looking at the MAGA doctrine or the entire right wing as potentially being that threat.
75 million Americans.
Now, I'm not the only one who took notice of this.
In fact, former Representative Tulsi Gabbard said that she fears a Democratic led effort to combat domestic terrorism could be used to eventually target Christians or anyone who loves freedom.
She appeared on Fox News and she said this.
It's so dangerous, Ms. Gabbard said, as you guys have been talking about.
This is an issue that all Democrats, Republicans, Independents, libertarians should be extremely concerned about, especially because we don't have to guess about where this goes or how this ends.
She goes on to say that the former congresswoman criticized recent comments by CIA Director John O'Brennan, who claimed that the Biden administration in response to January 6 capital riots, now this is important, by the way.
This is the CIA.
This is foreign intelligence, right?
Not domestic.
This is foreign intelligence in response to January 6th, U.S. Capitol riot was quoted saying this, that they are trying to uncover as much as they can about what looks very similar to insurgency movements that we've seen overseas, where they germinate in different parts of a country and they gain strength and it brings together an unholy alliance frequently of religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians.
Now, what he forgot to bring out is that, oh, there's already been an insurgency movement brewing of anarchists, communists, and black supremacists.
Conveniently, Savannah, conveniently.
He left that out.
I mean, it's like, you're talking about insurgency movements, sure.
Yeah.
But there's this weird moment where they just neglect to represent or talk about the fact that this same stuff is happening in the left wing.
Exactly.
And that's the greatest hypocrisy of all of this is, again, we've talked about this time and time again.
You've dedicated your entire show to this.
And I feel like, you know, that is the way that we really cut our teeth in the media industry is by reporting on the less violence that the left themselves would refuse to report on or even bring light to.
But now it's a big issue because it was Trump supporters that did it.
Now it's a big issue.
Now it's domestic terrorism.
Now it's racists and bigots and white supremacy that's the issue here.
No, no, absolutely not.
Yeah.
And you know what?
This is what Tulsi Gabbard said.
Tulsi Gabbard's come out, even though her stances on guns are absolutely atrocious.
She's from Hawaii.
She is beautiful and she also has some great abilities to link between the two parties.
Some wonder if it's because she just wants a contributor job at Fox News.
I don't know.
But she did say this right here.
When you look at their process and they start looking at what characteristics we're looking for as we're building this profile of potential extremists, what are we talking about?
Are we talking about religious extremists?
Are we talking about Christians, evangelical Christians?
What is an extremist?
Is it somebody who is pro-life?
Where do you take this?
You start looking at obviously has to be a white person, obviously, likely male.
Libertarians, anyone who loves freedom, liberty, maybe as an American flag outside their house, or people who you know attended a Trump rally, she continued.
Once you start walking this down this path, you see where it leads to a very dangerous undermining of our civil liberties, our freedoms in our constitution, and our targeting of almost half our country.
So you can find this bill here at congress.gov.
We'll make sure, Savannah, we put a link in the description so people can click on it and share it with friends and look at it.
And before we get away from the Tulsi article, too, I do want to bring up as well that, you know, she talks about people who have an American flag flying in front of their house can be now targeted as a potential domestic extremist.
I was reading a Breitbart article the other day about this soccer player who had to explain why she stood for the national anthem.
So that's terrible.
Exactly.
And so when she brings forward these points, you know, so many people on the left say, oh, Trump supporters are dramatic.
This is not something that's actually happening.
But then, you know, you also read these articles about how athletes have to explain why they're standing for the anthem of their country now.
Yeah.
Well, and that's that's what she brings up is that it's like she's going, look, just like everyone was like, oh, the Patriot Act and these, this new security measure is meant to save us from domestic, you know, attacks from, you know, the Taliban or whatever.
Right.
And, you know, 20 years later, we're still taking our shoes off at the airport.
And the TSA is a wasteful program.
I think it's 90% in audits that they failed to catch.
It's absurd.
We've dehumanized travel.
You know, we're using this to spy on Americans, listen on cell phones.
They spied on the Trump campaign.
Remember that when the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign and denied it.
I mean, the problem with giving the government power now to create new offices to look at domestic extremists and to label this insurgency with no parameters of what that means and showing that it's really looking at the people involved in the January 6th riot.
You see, this is a left-wing government, an authoritarian government trying to weaponize the spy agencies specifically and also the protective agencies to target their political adversaries, which is just you and me.
Are you trying to say that if you give the government unlimited power, they're going to abuse it?
That's unheard of, to be quite honest.
What?
I don't even know what to do with this information right now.
It's like giving a dog to Michael Vick, you know?
It's like you just, you just know.
You just, you just know it's going to happen.
You don't do that.
It's like, I bought you a puppy.
Wrong president.
Wrong president.
And you know that the government is already notoriously politically targeting.
We have an update here.
Let me see if I can get this up.
So let's bring up this article I talked about.
So we know already that the FBI was fairly warned and knew about the events on the Capitol Hill.
This is from the Washington Post.
Okay.
Now, before anyone, Savannah, I need you on the screen for this reaction to this article because like, I swear that I almost lost my, like, my freedom and my entire, we almost lost our jobs basically because it was a rough week, to say the least.
Because I chose to use the word revolutionaries to describe the people I was documenting on Capitol Hill.
Now, as evidence has come out, I have been vindicated for my choice of words, which did not mean I was co-sponsoring the violence.
I was using those words tactfully because the rhetoric that I heard from the groups I was following was similar to the rhetoric that the FBI now was aware of, which was very aggressive, warlike.
It's like when you read about, yeah, the Revolutionary War and the same terminology and tactics are being discussed.
And you're like, hmm, I feel like revolutionary may be a good word to use to define what's being said right now.
Yes, they're like, no.
What's revolutionaries, but we are going to try people who planned it for sedition.
And then they did claim that they were trying to fight a revolution.
Look at this quote.
This is incredible.
It's right here in the middle.
Read it to us.
So, like, as of January 5th of this year, the FBI Norfolk received information indicating calls for violence in response to unlawful lockdowns to begin on January 6th.
So they knew that they were going to do this.
Now, the document says that an online thread discussed specific right here, calls for violence, to include stating, here's an exact, I'm not laughing at the quote.
I just am laughing at the irony of me like experiencing one of the worst times of my life because I said these people wanted, were like, were declaring war.
It turns out the FBI had the same information I did this whole time.
And then it's also really funny too, like, oh, as a reporter on the ground, you were going to use this terminology during the battle that you were experiencing while you were being tear gassed and flashbanged and almost passed out from, you know, I did.
I'm a little, I can only be a tear gas for like a few minutes and then I feel sick.
But here's what it said.
This is what they were saying.
Be ready to fight.
Congress needs to hear glass breaking, doors being kicked in, and blood from their BLM and PANTIFA slave soldiers being spilled.
Get violent.
Stop calling this a march or rally or a protest.
Go there ready for war.
We get our president or nothing, we or we die.
Nothing else will achieve this goal.
Okay, so the people were calling for war.
I don't know.
That sounds like a regular calm Sunday morning to me.
Yeah, they're like, why would you call them that?
Well, because they were, people were calling for war.
Now, look, and this is what I love.
Also, great journalisming from Washington Post.
They try to act unbiased.
It's like BLM is probably referenced as to the Black Lives Matter movement for racial justice.
Bitch, you're writing about a riot that was caused by political extremists, and then you write about another political extreme group that caused riots as a group of racial justice.
I'm sorry, Elijah, but when they're burning down Owendy's and torching a Starbucks, it's for racial justice.
So if they stormed the Capitol for racial justice, would that have been like, do you see why media, do you see why people thought they could get away with a, with a, with a riot?
Because you sanctioned the rioting.
You are responsible.
The Washington Post has blood on their hands.
And I would say that the Capitol riots are more caused and incited by the media's coverage or lack of coverage there of the 10 months of nonstop bloodshed and violence that occurred on the streets of America.
And bring up that article one more time.
When this author, who the hell is this author, Matt Zapotowski, okay?
Matt Zapotowski has blood on his hands.
It's 2021.
I don't even know if it's a man, but saying BLM is probably a reference to the Black Lives Matter movement for racial justice, which is false.
And it has been proven that they are a violent extremist group led by communist sympathizers while condemning another riot from other people that they politically disagree with.
This is the problem in America is it's an unequal serving of justice.
And even when a journalist has the right to accurately present this and say, hey, look, this is serious.
And BLM is serious too.
And a lot of these people are pissed for a variety of reasons.
They stormed the Capitol because they genuinely are upset because they are being targeted and attacked and made to be second class citizens in their own country.
It doesn't justify the violence.
It doesn't make it good, but there's a reason why it happened.
And part of that reason was the lack of response to BLM, the preferential treatment to a terrorist group in this country.
And then you go, how did domestic terrorism take root at the Capitol?
How did it happen?
Well, you know, it bloody happened because people like you sanctioned it.
And you deserve, you deserve ridicule.
You're not a journalist.
You're a propagandist.
And that's why I think we're all sick of this.
It's like they're going to use the Capitol riots as justification to spy and target and take down all of their opposition.
Meanwhile, it's like, you know it.
And how do you know it?
Because when it comes to their own side, not only do they fail to condemn it, but they prop it up and rewrite history as if BLM's actually about racial justice.
I'm to hell with it.
I'm done.
And honestly, Elijah, we have to remember, too, that this isn't just our media that is doing this.
This is also our intelligence agencies.
Like you just said, it's the FBI.
It's the DOJ.
Going back into this article, I pulled out these quotes and I wanted to go ahead and read, again, from this article.
So apparently, due to the wide variety of behavior, some of the federal officers have argued internally that the people who are known to have committed unlawful entry and were not engaged in violent threatening or destructive behavior should not be charged, according to people familiar with discussions.
But other agents and prosecutors have pushed back against that suggestion, arguing that it is important to send a forceful message that the kind of political violence in mayhem displayed on January 6th needs to be punished to the full extent of the law so as to discourage similar conduct in the future.
Now, I wanted to point that out because again, why is it that the people that were involved January 6th are being punished to the full extent of the law?
Meanwhile, you can go burn down one of the most historic churches in Washington, D.C., but be a part of a Black Lives Matter Antifa group and it's okay.
Right.
No, and you know what?
And that's what I was going to say.
It's like, what's happening, though, is that this is important, guys, update on the Capitol.
As the media aligns with big tech and they silence people and the government comes in, it turns out that this article from the Washington Post as well, from Spencer S. Hasu, I think, I don't know how to say that, is that the Justice Department is having a hard time being able to charge rioters.
It's titled Justice Department, FBI Debate, Not Charging Some of the Capitol rioters.
So what's happening is it says that federal law enforcement officials are privately debating whether they should decline to charge some of the individuals who stated that, let me close those.
Some of the individuals who stormed the U.S. Capitol this month, a politically loaded proposition, but one alert to the practical concern that hundreds of such cases could swamp the local courthouses.
Internal discussions are in the early stages with no decisions having been reached or whether or not to forego charging some of those who legally entered.
What happened is, is they're finding that as they promised right here, a relentless effort to identify and arrest those who stormed the Capitol that day.
But internally, there's robust back and forth about whether charging all of them is the best course of action.
And the reason why is because what they're saying is that while, you know, they want to frame this as being something very, very damaging to the country and insane.
It turns out that between 800 and 1,000 people that entered, majority of those people appear to have just walked through open doors and the police didn't try to stop them.
Now, there was at least a couple hundred people, including 135 people that they've charged already, who were the initial instigators.
They broke windows.
They kicked down doors.
They assaulted officers.
They damaged offices, right?
We don't want to negate the fact that that occurred and those things happened and that those people are going to face prosecution for committing, in some cases, probably felonies, in most cases, misdemeanors.
And I wanted to jump in and remind people, though, that it wasn't just Trump supporters.
Let's not forget that John Sullivan, a known BLM leader and activist, was one of those people.
Yeah, we have yet to see evidence that the majority of people were Antifa, like Rudy Giuliani said.
If the evidence comes out and I was wrong, I'm okay with that.
I'm okay being wrong.
Look, I'm only reporting in live time.
So if it turns out that all of these people charged were Antifa, then okay.
But I've been looking at this, I've been looking at the political history of the people being charged, and it appears most of them are authentic Trump supporters.
And that's where people wonder why I keep saying that most of them are Trump supporters or most appear to be, or I say alleged, because as I look into their profiles, which is something crazy that journalists can do, rather than just, you know, I don't know, typecasting a victim, but I see that.
You do research behind things before you report them.
Yeah, I know.
It's a crazy thing that I actually do research on these people.
I've never heard of that before.
And I've been finding that a lot of them have a history of politically charged right-wing language on their social media account.
The ones that are still up.
And I'm looking at FBI affidavits and it looks like most people that committed the crimes are Trump supporters.
That's not to say all of them are.
And if I'm wrong and the FBI is lying, that could be true too.
But hey, please, please let me know in the comments.
I do try to read most of them, although I regret that every time I do it.
Okay.
Be nice, people.
Be nice.
Yeah.
So what happened is that the federal officials estimate that roughly 800 people entered, right?
Among those roughly 800 people, FBI agents and prosecutors have so far seen a broad mix of behavior from people dressed for military battle, moving in formation, hence the revolution claim, to wanton vandalism, also just simply going with the crowd into the building.
So what's happening is that the federal government realizes that perhaps what it's looking like is that if they try to charge all these people, it's going to look like political targeting because a lot of the people involved in what they're calling the riot, since we can't decide what to call it, we'll just start calling it the Capitol Hill siege or the riot.
They're realizing that if they go forward with this, they're going to lose a lot of these cases in court because it's just going to look like political targeting because that's actually what this is.
The truth is, is that the push to prosecute everyone in or around the building doesn't make sense from a legal standpoint and it probably won't stand in court.
And if they pursue it, not only does it look like and make them look like idiots and a failure, and it looks like from leaked information that a lot of people would get fired, right?
Because if you let 800 terrorists commit acts of terrorism on federal property and you had pre-knowledge, then you're probably going to get fired for not preventing that.
But number two, it's like, it looks like the majority of people involved in the Capitol Hill events had no terroristic threats, ideas, or intent behind them.
And we're finding that it's even for the cases that the FBI thinks they have in the bag, the Department of Justice is letting people know, actually, some of the way that you're approaching this appears to be more like political targeting of opposition to send a message rather than that you actually have real cases.
I'm going to see if I can pull, let me see where this article is.
Okay.
And as you pull up that article through a ledge, I just want to say that they put themselves in this position by not going forth and prosecuting BLM and Antifa because they refused to act when these people were ravaging and destroying our country.
Now, when it comes time to storming up the Capitol, when they actually do try to, you know, bring forward the full force of the law, well, it really doesn't make sense at this point because, like you said, it's now political targeting because you can't just do it to one side and not the other.
Right.
And that's why, like, remember this image.
Do you remember this guy?
Zip tie guy who invaded the Capitol with his mom.
It's just legendary.
It's the zip tie guy who invaded the Capitol with his mom.
Ordered released before trial.
Not that he invaded it.
It's just like, how crazy is this?
That there's.
So you're telling me that you've never plotted like storming the Capitol with your mom on a Thursday?
No, on a Wednesday.
So on a Wednesday.
I never.
My mom would not let me.
She'd be like, son, my mom didn't even like me reporting on this.
And I'm just going, what?
And it's like, I know crazy moms, but talk about like top, top quality, crazy mom.
It's like, son, we're going to go invade the Capitol.
And you're like, all right.
So this guy, zip tie guy who invaded the Capitol with his mom was ordered released before trial.
So he's no longer in custody.
Listen, spot out the U.S. Capitol insurrection.
I guess this article, we're calling it insurrection now with his mother and hopping around the Senate while holding tactical restraints, so-called zip tie guy, Eric Gavalek Munchel.
His image was blasted around the world on January 6th as the chilling portrait of what might have happened if writers found any politicians as they marauded through the building.
Well, on Friday afternoon, Munchel was ordered released by on bail.
Now, this is what happened because these are some transcripts from the courthouse.
This is an update.
I promised you guys I would keep you updated on what's happening with this whole Capitol thing.
It's quoted saying, in our society, liberty is the norm and detention before trial is the exception.
U.S. magistrate Judge Jeffrey S. Frenzley announced in explaining his decision.
I asked the government point blank what any potential danger was, and they referred to his radicalization in quotes and the views that he holds and his prior actions in Washington, D.C., the judge noted.
Okay, so here's what we're really seeing.
The federal government, the FBI, which we know is compromised, wanted this guy to remain in custody because of his radicalization, right?
Which is an assumption of intent, which is not a legal precedent.
Basically saying that they want to criminalize the fact that this person believes the election was stolen, amongst other things.
Now, I want to say this.
Radicalization is what everyone's using as the key term based on the what?
We call it, what are we calling it?
What complex?
Are we following along, Savannah?
Do you remember what we're calling this?
The disinformation.
Industrial complex.
Industrial complex.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, class.
I'm glad to know that my own producer, Savannah, doesn't even keep up with a script that's in front of her face.
There's a lot of things here.
There's a lot of things to keep up with.
Okay.
If you guys could actually see what she's, she has so many screens and stuff.
It's impressive.
But let's talk about this.
So basically, the reason why I think the Capitol events happened is not because of right-wing commentators, but it's because of something that it's called the Streisand effect.
Now, if you don't know about this, Savannah, can you take us through this?
You were explaining this to me because I didn't know about this until today.
Right.
So I was basically telling you how Barbara Streisand, apparently this California coastal program that was trying to document erosion was taking pictures of the coast.
But apparently Barbara Streisand had this secret entrance to her house and she was really upset that people were posting photos.
And in an attempt to get people to stop sharing photos of her house, it ended up with the media and of course everyone reporting on this entire situation and sharing this photo of her house and it was viewed over a million times.
And so in an attempt to oppress the information or suppress the information and try to censor it, it blew up.
Yeah.
And that's what I was going to say, is that I believe that people have been radicalized against the government and the media, as you might want to put it, because when people were questioning the election very early on, big tech, the mainstream and corporate outlets and officials in the government were silencing people.
And so sometimes when you get silenced and people tell you you can't talk about something, it makes you want to talk about it more.
And this is common sense.
Right?
The Bible says that it's like, it's not like basically that the law actually made me want to sin.
When I heard something I couldn't do, I naturally wanted to go do it.
And so what happens is, is that with this idea of like, well, you can't talk about this.
You can't talk about this.
We saw this with COVID, right?
Questioning the origination of COVID.
We saw this with the treatments for COVID.
We started seeing this around the election.
2020 was the year of complete censorship.
And it started pissing people off genuinely because they're going, well, there's got to be a reason I can't talk about this.
What are people hiding?
And the more that we look into things, the more that we realize, for instance, like the arguments were that there was specific cases of election fraud in certain cities and swing states.
And then the fact checkers came in and were like, false.
There's no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
And you're going, but nobody was making that case.
There was never an argument.
There was never an argument that there was widespread voter fraud.
I'd never even heard anyone make that argument that's of any credibility in my life.
It was that in some cities and states, there were questionable things that occurred that didn't make sense that needed to be explained.
And they never were explained and the audits were never given.
And I think that when the people felt like the government and the media were colluding with big tech to censor them and to instill a new and appoint a new regime rather than to go through the democratic process, and then there was no way for them to discuss that, that capping on them is pissing them off, which is why, again, I mentioned we made that thing where I said, guys, I think you're being baited into a civil war.
I think you're being baited into violence.
It turns out we were right.
That was their intent.
The censorship was all made together.
And the way that the election was baited, I believe, was to propagate some or propagate some sort of event like January 6th in order to get the right wing to commit some sort of an act of violence, specifically at one of the most respected buildings in the country where all Americans can believe and unite that it should be a place of peace.
By doing that, they have now used a basis and formed their new foundation because Charlottesville wasn't enough.
They have formed their new foundation for a radicalized new left wing that is fully in power, controls the House, the Senate, and the executive, will be installing new judges that they're going to use this to push their all-out campaign to completely instill an authoritarian, global list-friendly government that is in bed with China.
And we saw that even that, you know, we're even seeing now that Biden's in power, that, you know, now Biden's in power, basically the world is going back to its globalist chaos, right?
North Korea is back as a threat.
We're going back into sending convoys into the Middle East.
ISIS has returned magically after three years.
We're seeing surges in oil prices.
We're seeing an instability and loss of jobs in the energy sector.
We're seeing China say that we're all, you know, we're getting back into bed together.
I mean, wake up, people.
If you're not awake already, you have to realize that all of this is because they need to silence us because why?
We are populists and populism is opposed to the globalists.
And as we come together and we elected a president, they have to let us know that we are no longer in control of our government, that we don't have the power.
And they will demoralize us.
And now they will use January 6th as a means to completely de-platform, dethrone, and silence anyone who opposes them, including us.
It's true.
It's absolutely true.
And that's why I want to read, I have, go back to this article here.
And a major factor with the zip tie guy is a decision that his apparent and clear respect for law enforcement at the events show that he's not a danger.
And it's crazy that as they're trying to make it seem like holding right-wing views is makes you dangerous, then what does holding left-wing views do, Savannah?
I mean, you know what I'm saying?
It's like, why is it only right-wing views?
Exactly.
And that is the immense frustration that we will always and forever continue to face because, again, all of the big corporations, the media, big tech, they're all leftists and they prop up the leftists and they decide to show us what they want us to see.
We are only seeing the reality and we're only allowed to see the truth that they want us to see.
So when it comes to Black Lives Matter in Antifa, we're not allowed to see that these protests are bad.
But when it comes to Trump supporters, we're all domestic terrorists.
I mean, look at how the BLM protests were phrased in the media during COVID versus the way that Trump rallies were.
BLM protests didn't spread COVID because racial injustice and racial inequity is in itself a pandemic.
Meanwhile, Trump rallies were super spread.
Yeah, super spreader events.
So what the media and what big tech decide is reality is unfortunately the reality that we see.
Unless, you know, you're going to alt media sites.
You're really trying to push past the 10 layers of propaganda that we're constantly being fed.
And it's very frustrating that we have to live this way.
Right.
And we're going to look at this.
You guys, this is from a president who, by the way, Sav showed me his video and I couldn't believe it was real.
Let me make sure I'm not getting ahead of myself here.
You know, I know, ironically, guys, this show has become so much longer and you guys are watching.
And I really want to thank you for the support.
Please, again, some easy ways and free ways to support the show as we jump in the next segment.
You can follow us on Instagram, slightlyoffensive.tv.
We always give updates so you can get updates.
The reason why it's important to follow us on social media, you can follow me on Twitter, Elijah Schaefer.
You can follow me on Facebook, slightly offensive.
Again, subscribe on Rumble.
We're on Rumble now.
The reason why you have to follow us everywhere if you can is not because I'm trying to make it annoying.
It's because like, for instance, on YouTube here, you don't get our updates when we have new videos.
So, you know, like not only should you please make sure you subscribe to this, make sure you're still subscribed.
Sometimes they delete up to a thousand of our followers a day and we have to get you guys back in random purges.
But we put announcements for our videos and the content that's up.
And sometimes you also might miss an episode and you might not get like all the commentary.
So we try to put the articles and stuff up that we talk about and share on social media.
And I also, I get a lot of good ideas from you guys.
A lot of the topics and things we cover is just stuff people DM me and email me.
And so I really appreciate you guys, you know, emailing.
If you ever, if you ever need to, we'll get an email.
Don't please, please, you know, if you ever have anything good, just try to send it through social media, not email.
I really appreciate it more there.
But, you know, sending those things in those ways, it's really awesome and it helps us out a lot and gets our audience out, especially with younger audiences too, who need to be woken up.
But I really appreciate that, guys.
And again, for those of you guys that are, you know, leaving those five-star reviews, I'm so happy about it.
I really appreciate it on Apple Podcasts.
It's so great and I really appreciate it.
So Joe Biden, this guy that the media is covering for that are silencing, the reason why they have to silence us is because they're so, they think we're stupid, but unfortunately, we're not.
And so we keep exposing them.
Joe Biden got locked out of the White House.
This is a real, this is a real.
The studio is so good.
Can we just play it and then talk about it for a second?
Yes, yes.
There are the Bidens standing in the cold, waiting to be led into their new home, the White House.
Everyone wondered what was going on.
Why were the doors shut?
Well, now we know.
The chief usher who was supposed to open the door was fired.
Timothy Harleth was hired by the Trumps in 2017 after he had worked for them at the Trump International Hotel in D.C.
But the Bidens reportedly won the chief usher with no ties to Trump.
So Harleth was fired at 11.30 a.m., just as the inauguration ceremony was getting underway.
How amazing the usher so they got that was supposed to unlock the doors right before they arrived, but they got locked out of the White House and they couldn't get into their new home.
That's how stupid this administration is.
That's like next level idiocy.
I'm not even joking.
Yeah, you know the movie Idiocracy?
That's our reality.
Yeah, they're like, they got locked out of the White House on their first date.
It's hard when you barely leave the basement.
It's true.
But, you know, as we put here, the media is covering for him.
I think I have this tweet here.
Look at some of these ways the media.
It's like, Joe Biden might bring unity to the Middle East, basically what Trump was already doing.
Also, you have great, you know, this great treatment here from Jack Pesobik breaking Xi Jinping addresses Davos, warns leaders that the new Cold War could turn hot.
So suddenly we're now going to go to war with China potentially.
That's not good.
On top of that, you have this insanity showing a couple gay guys in two masks is not a convincing thing to get most people to do something.
But it's like double masking is a sensible and easy way to lower your risk when you have to spend more time around others.
Well, if I had to spend time around Pete Buttigieg, I wouldn't even wear a mask.
I would put a bag over my head and I would duct tape it shut because I would rather die than to have to be around him for more than like 35 seconds, which I've been around him before.
You know, and I was actually reading.
I was actually reading into this article and I just think it's so funny because going back to your point about how all of these foreign powers see the weakness of America and now they're all starting to act up again.
Underneath Trump, they weren't acting the way that they are now.
And I feel like that's because they did, they were kind of scared of Trump, whereas now Biden's in office and we, again, North Korea, China, the Middle East, everyone.
Yeah, let me bring these up.
Look, see?
Kim Jong-un calls U.S. North Korea's biggest enemy, vows to advance nuclear arsenal.
I think we have this here.
CNN, China flies warplanes close to Taiwan, an early test of Biden.
Do we have more articles here?
Yeah, the Jerusalem Post.
Baghdad bombing could be the Biden admin's first challenge.
I mean, and what is, and wait, and what is the media saying about these people?
Oh, yeah, look at this.
President Biden is the most religiously observant commander-in-chief in half a century.
A different, more liberal Christianity grounds his life and his policies.
It's like they're talking about his liberal Christianity, like his.
And double masking while all of the foreign powers are gearing up for war.
Yeah, exactly.
They're gearing up for war because this is a weak administration that doesn't put America first.
And this is what our media is feeding us.
And we wear a double mask.
And we should be aware of what's happening around the country.
We have to go to foreign outlets and obscure articles on these websites to find out what's really happening in the world.
And this is what's on the front page, telling us that we should all be homosexuals with multiple masks, which we're not going to do.
And can I just interject here with one of the quotes that I pulled out from this article because it was just too good?
It says, one big advantage of double masking that I found is that it creates a better fit and closes the gaps around the edge of your mask.
I like layering masks.
When I walk the dog or exercise outdoors, I wear a regular mask to comply with area mask rules.
Yeah, exactly.
And it's just absolute pathetic losers who don't understand anything and they're looking to the media to tell them the truth.
And that's the power they have.
They got people to want to wear one mask.
Why not wear two?
They silenced Alex Jones.
Why can't we silence the president?
And that's where you go.
If I told you years ago that when they were de-platforming Alex Jones, that they were going to de-platform a sitting elected president of the United States, you would have mocked us.
Not you, but like the media would have mocked us and been like, you conspiracy theorists.
This is what I'm saying, guys.
The gaslighting is coming from the worst of the worst.
And as our president, a bummeling idiot who I'm not even joking, couldn't even get into the White House.
He got locked out of his own home, is in charge.
Countries see it.
The world sees it.
And what are we doing to prepare for it?
We're not tackling it.
Why?
Because this was intentional.
Instead, they're going to use the idiocy of this campaign.
Do you know that this weekend that in the last few days, this is the first week of their campaign, Kamala Harris didn't have anything on her schedule for two days, Savannah?
Do you know that?
They had nothing for her to do for two days.
The last two days, nothing on her schedule.
Population.
Nothing on her schedule.
Not surprising at all.
She was taking a vacation on her first week.
Now, that's insane, but it's realistic.
And that's my point is because, and also Joe Biden has been stopping questions and work by noon.
So this is the insanity is this was designed so that the war could be waged to take back control of our country away from the populist movement.
And I know that they're scared because bring this up here.
Let me bring one second.
Let me see if I can bring this up.
Look at this.
Populism isn't going away.
You know, Maureen Le Pen, the populist leader of France, the first presidential polls came out, and Maureen Le Pen, the populist, is the leader right now in this recent poll by Europe Elects that conducted a survey.
So populism is back on the rise.
It was on the rise with Trump.
It's not going away.
And they know that Trump's populism and Trump's popularity isn't declining.
And so how do they, and they know that the media outlets are not going away.
I'm not going away.
I still like Trump a lot.
And I know that there is no evidence.
I think I pull it up here.
No, I don't have it.
Never mind.
I don't have the tweet, but there is no evidence that Trump's rhetoric is what incited the violence at the Capitol in terms of timelines.
And not only does my word make it make sense, but I worked with the New York Times, as I mentioned.
The timeline that we built, sometimes journalists can work with each other.
The timeline that was built uses a ton of journalists across different perspectives.
And it shows that Trump's words and speeches that day on the sixth could not have directly incited the riots.
Anyone pushing that rhetoric is disingenuous or intentionally dishonest.
And the reason why they've continued to try to push this to deplatform us, and why are they doing this?
It's because they're afraid that Trump will rise again, which is why they're trying to impeach him so that he can't run for office again, because they don't want anybody who could instill the voice of the people.
We are the voice of the people.
You are the people.
And we speak the truth.
And we speak truth to life because that is not only what God asks of us, but that's what the people of America deserve.
And here at Blaze TV, here on Slightly Offensive, even though we have fun, even though we continue to hold our reins back, we try to do our best to be respectful.
We know the truth.
We know what's happening and we're slowly exposing it.
And they want to silence.
They want you silenced because they don't want you to have rights.
They want you to be controlled.
And that's why it's so important that we keep up the work here, guys, and you continue to support us.
And I always tell you, please, if you ever are considering it, with all the censorship and the calls to deplatform us and the demonetization, we don't really have any ways to make money anymore through these social media outlets.
But through direct support at blazetv.com/slash Elijah, we do get your support directly.
And it's 30 bucks off.
I really encourage you to become a member.
And you get all of the content on there anyway.
It's amazing.
And it just supports the show directly.
Our trips, all of our original research, our team.
Guys, it is the best that we can do.
Because of that, we've been able to expand the show too.
We're going to do more things in the future.
Like I said, we're in the works.
And I really appreciate it.
I would say too, Elijah.
I just want to jump in and say, you know, you should really go to Blaze TV while you still can because you never know.
Next week, we may not be able to tell you where you can find us because we won't be on these platforms anymore.
So before you get to that point of Elijah Schaefer is wiped off of social media, where can I find the show?
Please go to Blaze TV while you still can, while we still have the option to tell you where to find us.
Yeah.
And as we, and as, and on a serious note, though, it's like, I'll tell you that if you can't, I always know that not everyone can afford a membership, and that's totally fine.
And I'm not, I don't want you to do anything you can afford.
But please, then, if you, if you want to know the free way to support the show, be given honest review, a five-star review, and subscribe to the audio podcast.
Listen to it too.
When you're at work or you're going, that's why we're trying to keep them a little bit longer and release a clip the next day for people that just want maybe the highlight of the story.
That's how we're doing things.
But I'm trying, the world has become more serious.
But luckily, we also, for those of you that make it to the end of the podcast, as a reward, as a reward, we always reward you guys.
You know, Savannah decided to call the our new Barbie collection that we're building.
You made up the name, the Diversity Coalition.
Yeah, very original, very original.
Right, because people were starting to claim that this show wasn't diverse enough.
Not only is the associate producer or producer, other producer Mexican and speaks Spanish, we also have an Asian Mexican producer, Savannah.
And Madison.
Don't forget Madison.
Yes, we have Madison.
Yes.
And because, you know, I used to call myself a gay black woman, but that was, you know, time for that is over.
I had legally become non-binary.
I paid $35.
I revoked being male in the state of California.
I got it taken off my ID and it doesn't have a gender anymore.
So I'm genderless in at least one state.
And I made it legit.
So now we have to make diversity legit.
So we brought in a non-binary Barbie, right?
Let's bring it up.
Okay.
And you guys voted and you guys chose the name.
You guys chose the name.
This is very serious.
Please, Elijah.
This is a very serious show.
Thank you.
Please.
This is a very serious moment.
Pay attention.
You guys voted.
Yes.
And the name of the new member of the Diversity Coalition is Robinette.
Not to be confused with the middle name of Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., the 46th president, the 46th president, or maybe the first appointed president of the United States.
We should just start calling him the first appointed president of the United States, but also the 46th president that you have to accept and can't question or will delete you off the internet.
In honor of fair and firm and transparent elections, we are labeling this is Robinette.
And I just, can we get some confetti from that?
Welcome to the family, Robinette.
Can we get diversity?
No one can ever say that our show isn't diverse.
We've got Elijah Schaefer.
We've got what?
Non-binary people on the show.
We have grabbed people on the show.
I'm going to tell you, make a note as we develop the show.
Let's get some sound effects, like cheering and crowd cheering.
I'll just be back here on the microphone.
Yeah.
Yeah, we'll get that.
Anyways, guys, thank you so much again for watching.
As always, we have a lot more coming up.
I'll let you know that we will probably not be producing a show Wednesday, although potentially we could, but probably not, because I'm getting oral work done.
I'll explain that more later after it happens.
But thank you guys so much for all your support.
Continue to share these links and these videos and share this video with people.
It does not expand naturally.
We rely on you guys sharing these videos to get the word out.
Thank you so much again.
We appreciate your support, as always.
And I like to end this show giving a salute, as always.
God, may God bless the United States of America, the most powerful country in the world.
