Dark Journalist and Olivia dissect the Charlie Kirk assassination, arguing official narratives are obfuscated by the "Patsy Principle" used to hide intelligence agency involvement. They critique the timeline of suspect Tyler Robinson, question the authenticity of a Mauser rifle image, and draw parallels to JFK, citing destroyed FBI notes and manipulated evidence involving Lee Harvey Oswald. The discussion connects these events to Rudolf Steiner's spiritual theories on secret societies, MKUltra mind control, and a broader "season of assassination" driven by deep state forces rather than lone actors or foreign states. Ultimately, the episode urges listeners to reject junk conspiracy theories and seek unfiltered facts through independent research to uncover deeper truths behind political violence and social division. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Escaping Corporate Media Hostages00:07:39
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalist.
What a fantastic crowd we have out there in the ideas from already.
Of course, tonight I am joined by the lovely Olivia.
Hi, everybody.
And Olivia, I went down, down, down into that burning ring of fire.
And I went further down, and the flames went higher.
When you go into this case of assassination in relation to American politics, it only gets deeper.
And what you think are simple explanations.
Even the simple explanations of who's behind it and all the rest of it, it never quite cuts it.
And tonight we're going to cut through a lot of the noise on this tonight to present you with some deep, deep expertise from a number of experts that I'm going to filter through here tonight, along with my own observations of some of the obfuscations in the Tyler Robinson case of the Kirk assassination and the terrible aftermath of the tragedy itself and how that.
Correlates with these forces through history, particularly in the last 60 years, but certainly moving that needle through centuries and using this tool of assassination and how it operates and the groups that are behind it and how they communicate to the public through these activities and the types of controls that they gain by doing this.
Of course, we're going to be taking your questions in the second half of tonight's program.
This is going to be a blockbuster.
So it's Dark Journalist X series.
205.
This is the episode, Assassination of America Revealed, the Patsy Principle, and Secret Societies.
It's all in there tonight.
And so great to have so many of you here.
Before I go any further, Ms. Olivia, what do you got?
Heartbone39 says the government has to be involved because they're lying about too many inconsistencies.
And Marina says the cover up intentionally sloppy.
It seems like there's too much bad planning and lack of foresight with the assassination details.
Well, they try to get it contained after the fact, you see, because.
The media in certain aspects of law enforcement, they're not involved in this.
This is a group.
This is a group with expertise that performs these things.
And then you slap in the organic thing on top of it.
And so it gets very interesting when you go through the details.
I'm going to do that tonight.
Of course, it's a very serious subject matter.
And the nature of the kind of environment around the independent media was.
You know, the mainstream media was closing it off, and the crazy, you know, kind of liberal media was trying to get into this Jimmy Kimmel as a victim.
What is there?
I mean, this is ridiculous.
This guy, you know, anyone would throw this guy off.
And that's happened before with a number of different shows.
And then all these hosts came out to say, hey, you know, they should stop politicizing these hosts and all the rest of it.
Look, they started the politicization of these over the past 10 to 15 years.
And the politicalization goes something like whoever is in office that they don't like, they just make all of the comedians go after them and that's it.
Now, anybody can make any jokes that they want to make, but when you get around a sensitive political issue, it is the call of the network that you work for to say, hey, you have freedom of speech in America, but you work for us and you can't say this.
And the idea that they would be repressing a powerful political idea or something else.
No, it's the thing that they were going after was the insensitivity of the host in question.
Now, the larger idea of can you say what you want on television, that is completely in the past 10 years the thing that they've tried to suppress.
They've shut our speech down on numerous occasions.
How many people did they throw off Twitter when they were in charge?
So, you know, it's a very hypocritical and absurd argument on their side.
On the side of the government, you know, what they need to do is take the win on that one and not do any overreach and say, hey, we can reach in there and start to alter speech in our favor for this administration.
That would be a mistake.
It's the kind of thing that when your opponent is getting themselves into trouble, you just let them keep going.
And unfortunately, there are still forces in that administration that are, you know, they're committed to overreach.
And there's a good center in the administration around these things, but the peripheral forces force them out of their kind of objective line of reasoning.
And whenever they get cocky, they get slapped back pretty hard.
So, it's very important to understand that the Kimmel thing was a decision by ABC and Disney.
And it wasn't, you know, they're trying to make him like Rosa Parks or something.
Go on.
It's ridiculous, you know.
He's basically a sleazebag TV host.
Let's get real.
Now, I do think it's important to separate that.
It's not like the Trump administration said shut him down, ABC, Disney shut them down on their own.
And then now the Trump people think they can get.
Some momentum with this and go after some of their media opponents who've been going after them for the past 10 years, let's not forget.
But in any case, two wrongs don't make a right on anything like that.
But the distortion on the liberal media side is absurd.
So that corporate media line that this was a Trump firing him through ABC.
No, ABC fired him because he's an insensitive cluck.
Now, A lot of, there were a lot of things floating around in relation to the assassination.
What it should be really is a period of reflection of those differences and also the overarching pattern that we've seen through history of how forces behind the scenes plot to bring all these people against each other.
And that's some of what we're going to be bringing tonight with a very deep, deep state conversation about this.
And one that's getting harder and harder to get.
Anywhere else.
And I look for it.
Trust me, you know, I'm not one of those cynical people who think everything's gone off the rails.
I look for the constructive conversations and I do not find them.
You know, there's an article in the Wall Street Journal, our old friends, the Wall Street Journal, and they were talking about how gatekeepers are good, you know, and how it was important for Time Life to keep the Sapruder film locked up for 12 years, you know, so that the nation wouldn't have to go through the trauma.
The only problem is, since they put it out and reversed the sequence of the actual assassination, they give a false impression of who is doing the shooting.
So that's what a news organization isn't supposed to do that.
And so the idea of celebrating gatekeeping, I think, this is a new law, it's got to be.
And the way you pull out of it is by not being a hostage to the corporate media on one side and not being a hostage to this astroturfed false version of the independent media with podcasts and, you know, craned.
crazy Candace Owens and all that stuff.
Unfiltered Truth Beyond Censorship00:02:39
You know, what you want is good reporting.
You want the potent aspect.
And if you find hundreds of millions of dollars are going around these things, keep a very close eye on them because I don't think they're bringing you the facts.
And what I want to do is create an environment where you get the facts, one, and two, you get information that's unfiltered.
So it's not being, you know, it isn't Qatar in the background or some other entity that's pulling the strings around this.
And it's not just the financial entities.
So you're not getting squeezed by a marketing op.
You're not getting squeezed by a political or intel op.
And that's when you get the really vital thing.
So that's what we get a lot in the ideas room, which is fantastic.
And you've had some great feedback from me since this terrible incident has hit.
So many of you have sent me things that were powerful and instructive and useful.
And so tonight I'm going to go through those to show that we're looking at a patsy pattern here and lots of lies from this government and this.
You know, kind of mainstream media together.
So, and that includes the FBI and Patel and all those people.
They are misrepresenting what's going on in this case.
And we need to get to the bottom of why.
And that tends to be what we do on this show.
I want to remind you, especially if you're new here, to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for our newsletter.
That's a free newsletter, but it keeps us in touch through the massive censorship.
And it's so funny to hear Kimmel talk about censorship, man.
You don't know what censorship is until you've been a dark journalist.
But basically, that newsletter comes directly, you know, so it goes right into your inbox and it's free.
So we let you know about the incredible shows that we have coming up, interviews.
You won't believe the interview schedule that we have coming up for you, docuseries that will blow your mind.
Of course, we have the Craze in the Hot Zone docuseries all about the secret ruins of Atlantis and the UFO File JFK series, which we're doing as well.
Both of those.
And you can be the first one to know about any of that stuff that's going on.
And along with any events and other surprises we have planned coming up for you.
So make sure you stand up and be counted, be on that newsletter list, and we'll make sure it comes to you once or twice a week.
And like I said, it's free and it takes just a second to sign up.
Go to darkjournalist.com and do it.
Now, Miss Olivia, what do you got?
Auntie Social says the Patsy, the Patsy.
I can't wait to hear about the Patsy.
The Patsy Principle Revealed00:16:01
Scarlet Fire says, much not adding up on Kirk's shooter.
Clearly, the man jumping down from the roof had no weapon, whole or disassembled.
I want evidence of what caliber bullet killed Kirk, like JFK's bullet found on his stretcher undamaged.
And Reverend Cat Carroll says, I'd like to see the forensics on trajectory.
Did they ever find the bullet?
Right.
So they haven't released a lot of information.
That's the interesting thing.
What you've seen about this Mauser is what they've said, word of mouth, and then the picture of the Mauser, which I have here, which is very confusing.
That picture is just the New York Post.
And the New York Post says, you know, we obtained this picture.
But not one official on the law enforcement side, FBI, or anybody, will lay claim to that picture.
Now, the picture's odd because it's in a cardboard box, this Mauser.
And there's a number of contradictions with it since they said it was wrapped in towels and all this other stuff.
And there's very simplistic explanations like, well, they put it in a cardboard box.
Look.
If you say it's evidence and you're taking pictures of it, then what you're going to do is you're going to take pictures of it the way you found it, right?
And that's what's going to come out.
So, why isn't any law enforcement person saying, yeah, that's the picture?
None of them will.
They will not.
Now, a number of people have reached out for law enforcement to confirm that picture, and it's deafening silence.
The reason is there's something wrong with that picture, and there's something wrong with that presentation.
There's also something wrong with the timeline, and I have their actual affidavit, which they use to get the charges against Tyler Robinson going.
Those charges are, you know, serious.
There's a number of them.
Of course, the murder charge and a number of other charges, including witness tampering.
I thought that was an interesting one to throw in there.
So, we're going to take a look at that tonight.
But what I want you to do is remember this a lot of things that you see and hear are not confirmed, it's not the facts of what they're showing you.
When they came out and said, here's their Discord conversation, a number of people, including me on X and other places, Twitter, Said, you know, this doesn't look like a real conversation.
And it doesn't.
It looks absurd.
I'm going to read some of that tonight because he uses a number of terms like vehicle.
How many 22 year olds do you know say, hey, I'm going to my vehicle right now?
Not many.
So there's a number of problems with that whole thing.
One of the things that I would like to point out is the whole thrust of that discussion and then the FBI comments after.
Now it's getting wishy washy the way they talk about it.
They're saying that is an interpretation or that is an abbreviated version, whatever it is.
So apparently that's not the full thing.
That's why they didn't put it out with the timestamps.
So the manufacturing of this conversation, where he gets in this text place and he starts saying, you know what?
Here's how I did it.
Here's all the evidence against me.
I'm just going to tell all this to my boyfriend.
So that doesn't add up immediately.
It was way too convenient.
And very, extremely problematic, I would say.
Yeah.
The word vehicle was the dead kidding for me.
It was like, you're going to write vehicle instead of car.
I mean, come on.
There are incredible overlaps.
And I don't know if this is symbolic, it's happening spontaneously, or if it's organized.
But there are incredible overlaps with this case and the Oswald JFK assassination, especially if you know that first 24, 48 hour period.
A number of odd things come out.
In that period of time, one of the things that came out very early in the Oswald case is about him and the FBI agent Hostie and how he showed up at FBI headquarters, Oswald, and left this note for Hostie, supposedly.
There's no record of this.
It's just, you know, this is what they said at the time.
And then the note itself was destroyed by Hostie before anybody got a look at it.
And Hostie said, Oh, it was just saying, you know, leave me and my wife alone.
Don't try to interrogate us or whatever.
You know, because she doesn't speak good Russian and it, you know, don't make me upset, that kind of thing.
Um, that doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
What's interesting is in the realm of JFK assassination research, Professor Peter Dale Scott, I think, is the best.
He noted through his own research, and he'd been into it since really the late 60s.
And uh, Professor Scott is still with us amazingly, still doing great work.
But one of the things he put across was he's the one who invented the term the deep state, by the way.
And um, What he put across was that it's very likely that Oswald was, in fact, working for Hostie.
And the idea was they were setting up Oswald by making him explore the idea of arms shipments, especially getting rifles through the mail and how those Cuban groups were getting weapons, which is why Oswald shows up in all these places ordering guns through the mail under assumed names.
There's no reason to do that in that period because in Texas, in Dallas, in those days, you could just walk into a gun shop with no ID or anything and walk out with a rifle.
So, that is all to plant this whole thing.
But if you're doing it as a job and you are an industrial security agent, as our friend Scott thought that Oswald was, then this case makes a lot more sense.
And the note he's leaving for Hostie is here's the update, here's what I'm doing.
And that they're using this whole situation to kind of put him in this role of when they grab him, they can say, aha, you have this P.O. box, it's a phony name, and you shipped a rifle to it.
And then we planted that rifle on the sixth floor, and you're guilty.
It's quite convenient, in fact.
So there's the destroyed note aspect, and this gets brought up again and again.
The other thing that's interesting is when they grabbed Oswald in his address book was the name James Hostey with the phone number.
When they listed everything that was in that book, his notebook, in the official evidence thing, they took that out.
Later, they said, Oh, it was an accident.
We didn't mean to leave that one guy's name out.
So that tells you a lot about Hostie, the destroyed note, and Oswald.
Instantly, in this case, you've got Kash Patel leaning forward before the microphones rather nervously and saying, Yeah, well, we have this whole note about him saying, I have a plan to take Kirk out.
I'm going to do it and all this stuff.
But very strangely and mysteriously saying, Oh, the actual note was destroyed.
So we don't have a copy of it.
But we know through our Enhanced aggressive interview technique, what it said.
Translation, you basically scared the pants off of his roommate to tell you anything that you wanted to, to avoid sentencing or whatever, and say, Did that note say that he was going to do this?
And that, you know, they've got the fluff guy saying, Yeah, yeah, you know, so that's not evidence.
So that whole thing, now you have the rifle images not confirmed by law enforcement and Kash Patel and what he said about the note.
Both of those just.
Leave off the radar.
They're false evidence for now until they can confirm them in some way.
And now the exchange itself is in question.
So you get three of the first pieces that they put forward in the realm of public opinion, and they've all fallen apart within the first week of grabbing this guy.
So you got to be very careful with how they handle it.
And also, you know, we've seen how this rolls out over years.
In the Kennedy case, by the time they brought the case before the House Assassinations Committee in 79, The committee realized, oh, the CIA deceived the Warren Commission, all this other stuff got covered up.
It was a completely different thing.
They said, actually, it was probably a conspiracy.
That was the official government line from the Congressional Committee.
I only got rid of that really fast.
But that's too long.
You see, 15 years, 16 years, it's too long.
If you can't get them now, it doesn't matter if we get them 20 years later and say, hey, you did this, it was arranged.
It's very important to see what they're doing now and to isolate the process now.
And so they're going to throw out a lot.
The people who are behind these events are going to throw out a lot of disinformation.
And I've made some general rules about dark journalism, but you really, when you do this work, you need to use this as the bullet points that will guide you through everything.
And here's how it works.
You have the official version of the story, which is very often just to save the institution.
So, you know, lone shooter, you know, Osama bin Laden with a cell phone in a cave commanding these guys, all that stuff, right?
That is the official story, and it's the boogeyman story.
The secondary story is when researchers look at it, you have professors, writers, and other people, attorneys.
They look at this and they say, none of that is true.
This is all bunk, everything that they put out.
And so you have this kind of secondary story.
By the media, that's called the conspiracy theory.
But there's a lot of dark journalism in that, in fact.
And that gets deeper at the actual story.
Then the third version, the third force in there is junk conspiracy.
You see junk conspiracy throughout.
I've mentioned Candace Owens tonight.
There's a bunch of others.
And they are pushing this thing and they'll try to push it over the edge to get you off.
The target.
And so the junk conspiracy is something that the first group who are putting out the official narrative put out in order to confuse everything and to obfuscate the situation and make it so bizarre that you won't go near it, right?
And that's how you get people going over the edge and saying, well, I can't go along with that.
That's too far.
So I'm going to go back to the official version because it's safe.
And this is something, you know, it's interesting.
Jim Mars, who was deep, deep, deep in the JFK case, when we would talk about it, he would say constantly, You know, they're always throwing in this obfuscation.
So, that third part, I just call it junk conspiracy.
And it goes side by side with the rest of this, you know.
And in the cases throughout, you always get the junk conspiracy thrown in there along with the real stuff.
And you have to learn to discern the difference.
And together, that's what we can do here.
And, you know, like things like the driver did it, you know, they're always going to throw those things in there.
And you have to make sure that you've got evidence.
For what you're talking about, and that the facts are on your side.
Remember, one man armed with the truth constitutes a majority, notwithstanding $100 million podcasts that are pop clicking through all your Twitter feeds and everything else, and just making a mess out of this situation, and a bunch of egos grabbing at each other and horrible people.
About Nick Fuentes?
This thing is gone.
The independent media, what it was supposed to be, was independent researchers.
And balancing out against this horrible mainstream media.
And they were getting, people were helping them, putting them.
And you have some good guys out there for sure, Greenwald and other people.
But this other thing that's masquerading as independent media isn't.
It's backed by hundreds of millions of dollars.
I've investigated it thoroughly.
And let me tell you, the money that is being poured into this thing to control narratives is absolutely terrifying.
So we need to be very conscious of that as we go forward here.
And, you know, so as far as it goes, from my perspective, half the battle is working with the right information to start with.
Because remember, on the mainstream side, you're going to get that official version and they're going to block out the truth with that.
So when you go for the secondary information, you cannot go over a cliff just because somebody is running a big production around a particular thing.
Very important.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
Deep, deep, deep tonight in X Series 205.
This is Assassination of America revealed.
The Patsy Principle, Secret Societies.
It's all here tonight.
And we're going to be taking your questions, as I mentioned, in the second half of tonight's program.
Miss Olivia, how are you doing?
I'm not doing great.
I can tell it's not going to be a fun night in the ideas.
Oh, no.
Yeah, that's always, you know, when the temperature gets hot, the facts always cool things down.
The Black Zionist says Charlie was shot with a palm pistol from a guy dressed in beige to the left of Charlie.
The same guy who assassinated Charlie jumped the metal gate and helped assist Charlie to the private vehicle for a hospital ride.
You showed me this video.
Yes.
That's very interesting.
It's not conclusive.
But it's interesting.
And I think all that information, what they have is what they pretend now is the shooter and the angle and all that stuff, is they can very easily prove their case because there was a camera aimed directly at all that and it was right behind Kirk when he was assassinated.
There's a guy who stands on the chair that Charlie Kirk was assassinated on.
And removes that camera, and then we never hear anything about any of that footage or anything.
Now, maybe they will release it.
I hope that they do.
But it's very suspicious that we don't have that information and that that camera got grabbed like that.
So there needs to be explanations around this.
Look, the law enforcement officials are accountable to the public.
That's the way that it works.
Just like in a jury system, that defendant is presumed innocent.
Before a jury of his peers decide on his innocence or guilt.
That's the way America works.
So when you have all of these grandstanding former Fox hosts or whatever doing podcasts now, and they're like, I want to be there on the firing squad, this is the wrong approach.
You cannot have that.
What you need is a very objective approach to find out the truth because we have a history in America.
Of the Patsy Principle.
And we're going to get into that tonight.
I'm very excited to deliver this to you tonight.
And it's going to be fantastic as well to go through all of this because the Ideas Room is one of the most informed groups on the entire internet.
And that's what makes this show such a joy to do.
What else you got?
Nenna says the sheer number of suspicious people seen running from the scene, carrying gun, gun and bag, confessing, taking cards out of cameras, making weird hand signals.
The list is a marvelous compilation.
And El Cid Barris says, What about the persons first detained that were in the crowd?
What is this guy's name again?
Suspicious People At The Scene00:05:11
Something Domingo.
Okay.
Holman, right?
Holman Domingo.
Holman Domingo.
Remind me of that later.
That's going to be important.
There's a Betty and Barney Hill movie coming out.
And I want to.
There's actually two of them coming out, interestingly enough.
One is the Obama production, and.
One is another one with Demi Moore and Domingo.
Coleman Domingo.
Okay, Coleman Domingo.
I'm actually going to show it now.
Now, the trying to rebrand the Betty and Barney Hill thing is the love story of the century.
And it's Demi Moore and say his name again Coleman Domingo.
Coleman Domingo.
Two very hot people.
Yeah, this guy does not look like Barney Hill at all, nor does Demi look like Betty.
And I just think that this is very interesting.
It's called Strange Intruders.
And we're getting a lot of intel about that.
It looks like the Obama production for Netflix will hit first, though White Mountain, I think that's called.
And it's a totally different approach on this.
So something interesting and strange is going on there.
But they did this.
I remember when they did Killing Kennedy on Fox, and it was the most ridiculous production you've ever seen.
So they have Marguerite Oswald.
You know, Marguerite Oswald in real life, you know, she had a lot of courage, she had a lot of guts, but she looked like a troll, you know, she looked like a little troll woman.
And she, in that, though, in Killing Kennedy, she came out on that Fox thing, and it was like, you know, she looked like a former stripper or something.
She came up and she visits Oswald in his cell, and she's like, Lee, how are you, my darling, you know.
So that's how they do things in this kind of absurd thing.
I think that they should stick to the characterizations.
I think people want them to be realistic and that you don't need people to be kind of uber fab when you are addressing them historically.
Yes.
It's good.
It is, you know, I'm telling you the nature of the environment is such.
But I will tell you this that what happens when you get into.
Netflix and things, bringing them themselves into this arena.
You have to be very solid in the work that you do around it, like we were doing with the Casalaro case.
It was very important.
And then they came out with this ridiculous version.
The guy starts dressing up like Casalaro in the documentary.
So they know that these topics have been popularized and that the real researchers have gone after this and done the right thing.
But what we have going on is, you know, The nature of the problem is that they exploit those things.
And now that's spilling over into podcast land.
So it is very important.
The work that we do here and the kind of symbiosis we have with the ideas from that's the thing that counts.
And remember that through all of this different thing, they're going to throw a lot of spaghetti against the wall here at the close of the year because they're gearing up for an election year next year.
That's just the nature of the environment that we're in.
But if we keep, you know, If we keep our wits about us, we're going to find some exploding, exploding truths in the middle of all this that's going to be very, very worthwhile indeed.
The other thing I want to mention is that we're going to do your questions.
You can ask the questions now, and Miss Olivia is going to put those together for us, and we'll take them in the last half hour.
We'll go about two hours with you here tonight.
Miss Olivia, what do you got?
Alchemy by Angela says We know collective trauma, further division, and, quote, pleasing Aramon.
By death, destruction, and celebrating death were all necessities, but was this a distraction?
Psyops are multifaceted.
I'm going to show you about the history of this because you need that awareness of how that works over time and what the goals are in order to, you know, sort of bring about the right way to look at it.
There can be a lot of knee jerk stuff.
That's the funny thing because.
When I went into this case, I went completely eyes open, looking just for them to give us the facts.
Then they started messing with the story.
And we shouldn't accept a story that's messed with.
We should demand the facts.
And because we have a history of investigating these things, we know the right questions to ask.
So, yeah, there's a lot of manipulation around this.
I'm going to read some of the material from the case.
And then we're going to go into a very interesting backdrop of going through.
The history of assassination and what it's been used for, everyone from Franz Ferdinand to John F. Kennedy, and what that is about, and also an esoteric perspective provided by the kind of counterpoint to the secret societies by the mystery schools.
This is going to be particularly fascinating.
Okay.
Oswald's Mysterious Doppelganger Story00:14:36
First off, one of the things I want to point out is right away when they started putting out the text messages, this guy started talking about his doppelganger.
And the way they were portraying it in the media was he was joking about it.
And yet, when you see him in all these different places with different outfits, and you think about the comparison with the Lee Harvey Oswald setup of the assassination and all the rest, and how many Oswalds that there were, and how J. Edgar Hoover, our FBI director at the time, was aware three years earlier and wrote a memo himself about Oswald saying someone was using his identity.
So, the doppelganger thing is deep, deep in the intel system.
When it gets raised right off the bat in this case, it's a huge red flag, as was the Mauser.
But what he says is suspect in Charlie Kirk death joked his doppelganger did it in this group chat here.
Now, as I mentioned at the start of the show, FBI agent Hostie got a note from Oswald that Oswald left at FBI headquarters.
Could have said anything, but he destroyed it.
In fact, that's destroying evidence.
But he was never called out.
He was questioned heavily by committees years later, but it was too late.
Here we go.
FBI director references a note discovered at the suspect's home, which vowed to take out Kirk.
Charlie Kirk, suspect linked to crime scene, right?
That's what Patel said.
Now, we know there's no note.
There's no note.
The note was, according to Patel, destroyed.
Just like Hostie destroyed Oswald's note.
And he said he was able to ascertain through his brilliant, aggressive technique of interviewing.
Yeah.
So that's like hardcore interrogation of the fluff guy who would tell him anything.
That's what they are citing as evidence.
You have to get the difference when you're doing this, it's absolutely crucial.
There was no evidence of a note.
There was hearsay that they got from an aggressive interview style.
That's not the same thing.
So he made another mistake earlier in that whole, we got him and all that stuff.
Look, when you get a suspect in custody, it's not that you got him.
You have someone who's a suspect who's protected by constitutional rights, right?
So he is your suspect.
And if you can prove it legally, then you got him.
But you don't have, you didn't get anything.
You just have a suspect in custody.
That's it.
So a lot of that was very sketchy right off the bat.
The FBI gave us misdirection for some reason, and the news media did as well.
Next up, the timeline.
This came through law enforcement's affidavit.
Now I'm going to read the actual affidavit so there's no misunderstanding.
But this is a published section that came out in the media, and then I'll read the actual thing.
12 17 p.m.
This is at the university just before the assassination.
Robinson allegedly climbed over a short wall, crouched down on the north side of the roof.
12 22 p.m., note the time.
Robinson stood up and ran across the roof on the west side and appeared to scoot as he got closer to the edge.
Investigators said his limp was noticeably gone.
Yeah.
1223, Kirk was fatally shot.
How do you at 1222 get the suspect dancing across the top of the thing?
His limp is gone and he's getting closer to the edge.
And within one minute, he sits down.
You know, he aims his rifle, calibrates his rifle.
It's obviously been put back together, apparently, according to their version of the story, which doesn't make any sense.
Aim it, get a perfect shot, all within one minute.
Can't be done.
Now, a number of rifle experts have come out and showed how absurd this claim is.
1222 dancing on that roof, 1223 doing the shot.
You're not going to make it.
That's wrong.
So they're feeding us wrong information there.
Here's what they actually say, just so there's no misunderstanding.
At approximately 1217, suspect climbed over a short wall and appeared to crouch down on the north side of the wall on the rooftop.
At approximately 1222, suspect stood up, started running across the rooftop of the Losey Center building.
The notable limp from previous surveillance was absent.
Suspect ran to the west side of the rooftop and appeared to scoot along the rooftop.
As he got closer to the edge, okay, he's scooting.
At approximately 12 22, he is near the edge of the rooftop and appeared to be facing west in the direction of the courtyard area.
The rooftop of the Losey Center building overlooks the courtyard, et cetera, et cetera.
At 12 23, Charlie Kirk was shot.
So, their explanation for a minute for this guy to do this doesn't add up.
So, they're going to have to provide the footage that was hanging out there, or else this is just going to, you know, the lawyers that this guy has might be able to blow this away if they don't start coming up with the real story.
But in any case, this is bunk.
And then what they proceed to tell us is that when he jumped off the roof, he had somehow disassembled the rifle with a screwdriver and all that stuff and changed his clothes.
Now, he changed his outfit four times.
That's a lot.
So, I don't think at this point we know how many people we're dealing with.
There are stories now of him getting off that roof, as somebody mentioned, and having a car pick him up.
When they've shown him, and they must have better versions than the things that they're showing us, but as we've looked at them, it does not look like the person jumping off that roof has a rifle.
And when you see people who are rifle experts dissembling their gun, there's no way that that backpack, you can have the Mauser in that backpack.
Without it showing, you know, because that's not even a very big backpack.
So there's a lot, a lot of problems.
One of the things I noted also is that in that very sketchy exchange that law enforcement released between Robinson and his boyfriend and roommate and all that, where he said, I did it and here's how I did it.
My love.
My love.
My roommate love.
You know, what's interesting to me is he says, Oh, the feds keep showing the picture of my rifle.
Now, the feds never showed anything.
The New York Post showed a picture of a rifle and it had none of the identifying, you know, setup that they had said about this thing is wrapped in towels.
They would have taken pictures of that and they would have had that.
So then I asked the New York Post to confirm it.
You know, can you confirm it with law enforcement or did you just guess of this thing?
I am going to show you a couple pictures here.
This is one of the outfits.
That's one.
Of the Tyler Robinsons that day.
That is him somewhere around 8 30 in the morning walking toward the university in shorts.
And the amount of changing clothes here is bothersome for a lot of reasons.
And I'll explain why in a moment.
Of course, the final change of clothes is the picture that came out yesterday of him hanging out at Dairy Queen at 6 38.
This is a problem also because.
He's also supposed to be on his way back by then.
What is he doing there six hours later, hanging out at Dairy Queen?
It's very interesting because, of course, you know, we had that the recent shooter who was hanging out at the healthcare pharmaceutical shooter.
What was it, Mangione?
He was at a McDonald's just hanging out.
It is very odd because there is a pattern there too with Oswald and the whole thing about him hanging out and having a Coke and all that.
There might be some instruction.
In the general.
Yeah.
Yeah.
There's no question.
Something odd.
Very, very odd.
So I don't think that you're going to be shooting up people and then, you know, hanging out at Dairy Queen.
Doesn't fly for me.
And six hours later, you're obviously hanging out somewhere.
Where were you?
Now, here's where the confusion comes in on the New York Post.
Now, they blasted this all over the place.
All the media picked it up and said, that's the rifle.
You know, I guess that's a done deal and all the rest of it.
Now, of course, this thing is an assembled rifle.
He's supposed to have disassembled it on top of the roof there, jumped off, taken off.
No, they have him then putting it back together for this.
This doesn't make any sense.
Bolt action rifle recovered near the scene.
This is a Mauser.
And famously, of course, it was a Mauser that was found on the sixth floor originally by police in the Oswald case.
It was put across as a very interesting key piece of evidence.
Three different officers in the JFK case wrote affidavits swearing to the fact that they found a Mauser.
Those policemen were Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig, who they would eventually get rid of for talking too much truth.
And when I say get rid of, they actually would bump him off.
He would become part of the witnesses that died.
And Seymour Weitzman, who owned a gun store.
You'd think he would know what rifles were which.
And he said it was a Mauser.
Craig said it was a Mauser.
And then finally, there's.
Detective Boone.
And Boone, as I mentioned, very, very interestingly and strangely, and there's often aerospace hanging out in the center of these assassinations, as I've pointed out, he will become the person who runs all of the Roswell, the people who own the Roswell Ranch, all the Foster Ranch business.
He's going to be their number one guy.
And he's actually only on the force for a couple of years.
And it's interesting, just the year previous, instead of being on the police force, he was an advertising executive for the newspaper, and Jack Ruby was one of his main accounts.
So that's Detective Boone, who's the first guy who found the rifle on the sixth floor.
He has an affidavit, and that affidavit says it's a Mauser.
There's a strange signature with the Mauser, regardless of how you look at it.
It's very unusual.
This picture, according to the New York Post, says a bolt action rifle recovered near the scene where Charlie Kirk was fatally shot.
That's what they have.
No towels, some weird thing that they have in a box.
And another image of that.
I don't want to show it.
Now, What's interesting about that is there's a problem with that whole setup because nobody, as I've mentioned, in law enforcement will come forward and touch it.
So, why doesn't, you know, I don't know, one of the attorney general of Utah, why doesn't he say, yeah, that's right?
Why doesn't the governor of Utah say, yeah, that is what we found, that's our picture?
None of those guys will touch it.
So, they like the impression of it being out there, but nobody will confirm it.
In the meantime, you have Kash Patel saying, hey, we have a note where he said all this stuff, that's destroyed.
You can't see that, and there's nobody confirming this.
So, how much evidence do you actually have in this case?
It's getting very, very sketchy indeed.
And when I get into the next level of what type of security and protection was there, you might be shocked at exactly what might be available to them in terms of personnel around an event like this and how that all fits in.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
This is deep, deep tonight with the assassination of America revealed.
The Patsy Principle.
It is Dark Journalist X Series 205.
And we're going to be taking your questions in the second half of tonight's program.
Like I said, we'll go right up to about 11 o'clock with you on the East Coast here tonight.
I want to remind you, especially if you are new here, to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for our newsletter.
It's a free newsletter, and it lets you know past the incredible censorship that we experience in this program.
In relation to these deep, deep subjects.
But it lets you know about the great documentaries and docuseries we have coming up for you.
Of course, incredible guests that you won't believe, mind blowing X series episodes.
It's all there in the newsletter for you.
Stand up and be counted and make sure you get it first.
And also, you know, in case the social media networks aren't cooperating at that point.
Before I go any further, Miss Olivia, what do you got?
Kara P says Alexander Bruce of Forbidden Knowledge presents evidence that Kirk's neck wound was actually an exit wound and that he was shot from behind.
Shades of RFK?
Yeah, there was some discussion around that.
It's very hard to get those details, like I said.
It's the early days of this investigation, right?
I mean, everybody wants immediate gratification.
They want to know all the details.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And these are great questions coming from all angles.
Everybody is drawing conclusions a little too quickly.
Yeah.
And we should question everything that comes through.
Well, good research is asking the right questions.
Questioning Official FBI Narratives00:15:07
And not taking this kind of, you know, so many people have been brainwashed just by what the FBI has put out and then what the media has put out with them.
So that combination, it looks like you're getting this official thing.
And then you get people wildly speculating about who did it over here and using their own personal, you know, hobby horse to do it.
That's not investigations, that is podcast, pop clipping.
And a lot of those people don't even have any kind of core identity either.
They're doing it because, you know, They're getting attention for it.
And I've already pointed out the worst of that field tonight, so I won't go any further on that.
But I will say there's a real separating line in a case like this.
And it's a stress test for the independent media in a lot of ways, because a lot of the independent media calls out the mainstream media for obfuscation and all this type of thing.
And what's happened is the astroturfing of the independent media has brought on all of these kind of phony characters.
And they're well financed, and somebody wants to take over that spot and just make it the new mainstream media.
So, you have one paid media here, one paid media there.
Right down this very tiny sliver in the middle, there is some of the work that we're doing.
Even if it's a lone outpost, I don't care, but we're going to get you that real piece to work with, and it won't be manipulated by either side, which I think is crucial.
That's where you get potent work.
And that's what we're aiming for right here.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
It's X Series 205.
What else you got?
Amarillo Gunrunner says, I'm a gun guy.
The shot we heard was a rifle shot.
Yeah.
Well, you know, could they have used a drone?
They could have used a drone to assassinate.
They could have just stuck this kid on the roof with a rifle.
They could have pre shot, you know, around for that rifle.
There's a lot of things that they can do.
So, wrapping up the case the way that they want to and then throwing in the trans thing, you know, it seems like a little bit of a convenient.
Media burrito to throw at the public at this point.
The obfuscations around the FBI's identification of the note, the destruction of the note, the obfuscations around the timeline, which are absurd.
You can't be dancing around on a roof at 12 22 and then be shooting a minute later.
Sorry.
No.
Doesn't work.
Because any rifle person will tell you you have to set up, you have to get the person in your sight, you have to calibrate your weapon.
In a situation like that.
And you can't do it, even if you're an expert in a minute, it's not going to happen.
So let's get real about that.
That's not accurate information.
However, else, you know, if they want to say, well, we put it out, it was wrong, okay, but it's not accurate.
We're not accepting that.
No way.
Yeah.
What else you got?
I'm sorry.
There's just so many opinions.
Yeah, I know.
Yeah.
Everybody's reporting on this.
And depending on who you're listening to, yeah.
Yeah.
You know, you're going to, you know, I've seen, Different expert snipers have different opinions about the game.
Yeah, right.
Exactly.
I mean, it's like, and then you get different influencers who watch those videos, and it all comes down.
Yeah, I mean, this is the dark journalist show.
You're getting dark journalists, deep information, deep research.
You might have some fluff stuff out there.
You might have some good stuff out there, whatever it is.
Take it all into account.
But I can tell you this that we're giving you the most solid information from the most solid sources.
And we're giving you the background more importantly than trying to manage the case in real time so much is to give you how these cases, the types of influences that are around these cases and what their goals are and what types of forces get involved around this.
I don't think that people understand that.
I've heard even good people saying, you know, oh, well, you know, we shouldn't get wrapped up around this Kirk thing because it's a distraction and, you know, it's a joke, it's theater and all that nonsense.
Look, very, very.
You know, that guy had taken over an entire wing on these universities of giving them other ideas to work with and was working around youth, which is a group that wants to be dominated by this kind of Marxist aspect.
And he represented an opposite point of view.
And he was shot in broad daylight.
It's a gigantic case.
It does require our attention.
It's our moral responsibility to investigate it.
So I don't want to hear any of that.
But I also don't want to go over a cliff with whoever's favorite enemy or whatever.
I want the real facts.
And those facts usually don't go back to a state actor, they usually go back directly to an intelligence agency.
That's who are experts at assassination.
Who's the best expert at assassination in America?
The Central Intelligence Agency.
Were they involved in this crime?
I have no idea.
But when you're looking at assassination, what organization inside America is good at assassination?
The Central Intelligence Agency, bar none, is the best.
That's where you would look first.
Were there intelligence agents in that crowd?
So when you get into deep state assassinations, you have to look at the broad scope.
And they're always going to give you, you know, the Jack Rubies, the John Hinckley's, the Mark David Chapman's.
You know, you're always going to get them.
The Thomas Matthew Crooks.
That is the Patsy Principle.
They manipulate us with the Patsy Principle by giving us the background.
And it's interesting, you know, when you look at Crooks and just noticing his hair, for example, here, which is kind of like, you know, his hair is not very good.
It's pretty ratty and there are a lot of problems with it.
The guy on the roof, I want you to look at this because you're really good with details like that.
Look at the.
Hair of that guy on the roof.
I mean, this person has totally different kind of hair.
Now, I'm not saying, oh, it's longer, you know, his hair quality is different.
So, you know, unless he started taking multivitamins to give himself shiny hair, I don't know what to tell you.
You know, that does not seem like the same person on the roof.
Now, they rushed the autopsy thing with Crooks and then cremated him.
That's the end of that.
So, we're not going to be able to get information about who that was up there.
Of course, there was somebody else that got mentioned very early on in the case, which is Matthew Yurick.
You know, he looked the part, he had the background.
What happened to that case?
They just stopped mentioning him.
And maybe he was just an innocent person who was grabbed, and, you know, there's nothing more to say there.
But you should say, you know, this is what we determined about Yurick and so on.
Instead, they just brushed that story away.
There are reports, if you listen to what was going on in Butler, Pennsylvania, and of course, this is the case where they were trying to assassinate President Trump, who was leading candidate Trump at the time last year in July.
And the Secret Service allowed this person on the roof, very much like the Kirk situation.
So, something fundamentally wrong.
And you have to understand how these people do this, what types of groups do it, because the official explanations don't hold.
And they haven't held.
Certainly going back at least to the Kennedy era, but even before that.
But if we just have that as the kind of genesis of the period that we're in, the Kennedy assassination, they're still investigating at a federal level.
They're still releasing records because they've held the truth back for over 60 years.
So the government didn't want the public to have the truth on that case.
The things that have slipped out now, including the Joe Annities was setting up Oswald.
Joe Annides was a paid CIA psychological manipulator, top psychological warfare officer in the government, and that he was setting up Oswald before the assassination.
So, is that just supposed to be, well, you know, that record came out, so what?
No, the government then needs to go back and reshuffle what they have there with the Central Intelligence Agency.
They need to go on the record and say 60 years ago, one of our guys got involved in the assassination.
At least to set up Oswald.
Now, we know that they did a lot more than that.
But you see, it's not just to float out an innocuous historical detail.
There are actions related to the things.
And that's what they've always been afraid of.
That's why they held the records back in the first place, because of their own complicity, not only in the assassination, but in the cover up ever after.
So we have to get on the same page about that.
And amazingly, over 60% of the American public understands at this point.
And, you know, these cases span histories, you know, and the things that took place in the 60s might be decades before, you know, many of us were born.
Some other people lived through it.
But whatever, you know, that is, it's a generational piece, and we don't solve it by, you know, just adding some detail 60 or 70 years later.
It needs the detail to make the change.
Because if the government was involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, which it certainly was, then that needs to, Fall that the entire embrace of this clandestine agency and a number of agencies now, that whole thing needs to be rethought.
And now it's on the record, right?
So that's where I think you get into different territory.
Yes.
Some people, I hate to bring this up, some people are claiming that Charlie's in the protection program.
Oh, no, it's terrible.
Yeah.
It's terrible.
Yeah.
I mean, that's, you know, that's just crazy talk, unfortunately.
And you always, you know, that stuff is around there.
That's the junk conspiracy.
That's just the way it goes.
And it gets floated out there on purpose so people will stop looking for answers.
But no, I mean, you know, it's such a sad situation and a sad story.
And, you know, the idea that they have in historical situations had doubles for people on a historical level, like doubles for Oswald and stuff, is a proven fact.
They're actually memos.
From the FBI director about it in that period that we have.
So we know it's a fact.
And we also know some of those people who were paid to duplicate him came out years later and said, Yeah, they had me doing this.
So you see how that is one type of going deep.
And that's a kind of dark journalism.
But then the junk conspiracy can come in right away and be like, Oh no, what was that stupid thing where they said Kennedy escaped through a trap door?
Oh God.
I love it.
So, you know, it is a tricky environment to navigate, but I very simply go back to the work of Professor Scott, the work of Dr. Farrell.
You know, there's a lot of solid foundation.
My own research in this case of assassinations spans decades now.
So it's very easy for me to see what's what.
And then you take that into your own perspective and you roll it around and figure out what feels right to you.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We are going deep, deep tonight in this live stream, X Series 205, The Assassination of America.
You know, I take that from the Paris Flamand book, and I'm going to talk to you next about Paris Flamand as we go deep here.
Patsy Principle Revealed Secret Societies are also involved here.
I want to remind you, of course, we're going to take your questions in the second half of tonight's program.
Maybe have something else at this point.
All right.
Well, I'm going to read a couple of interesting quotes here, going a little bit further.
I want to point out something about a couple of historical cases.
One of them in this case is for Lee Harvey Oswald.
And something that's not often put in perspective properly is about Oswald himself and the signals he was sending just before they bumped him off, as it were.
Also, we were talking about mysterious backgrounds with Oswald.
I've brought this up on a number of occasions that there's an entire Oswald history and a family named Timur in North Dakota that claimed Oswald was their next door neighbor for a year and a half in North Dakota.
Here's one of these.
60 years later, mystery still swirls around whether Lee Harvey Oswald once lived in North Dakota.
A recent Gallup poll suggests that 65% of Americans believe the death of President Kennedy involved a conspiracy.
Timur said that one small North Dakota town is part of the story.
That town is Stanley.
Very interesting, too.
If you look at that in Stanley at the time, the Oswald that was there with his mother was saying that he was saying, My dad works in the oil rigs.
That's why we live in the trailer over here.
And that's a number of different people who worked on those rigs.
The family would live in the trailers.
The father would go work off in the oil fields and then come back.
And that's the way it worked.
So there was a lot with this.
And one of the oddest things I found in the middle of that case was that Timur, when the assassination came out, and he sent letters to the Warren Commission and everything else, he was willing to testify and gave them all the information.
And his mother gave him the information.
It's like, yeah, I remember Oswald.
We called him Harvey, Harvey Lee.
So one of the things that happened is this weird incident where he goes into, at the age of 13, This version of Oswald in North Dakota.
And he goes into a library and causes a complete ruckus because the Karl Marx, you know, his famous opus is not there.
And he flips out, and they have to call security and some law enforcement to get him out of there because he caused such a huff in this.
So that goes into some kind of record that this guy, you know, oh, yeah, even at 13, he was causing problems and he was a Marxist.
The Telling Lee Bracelet Clue00:03:52
So they had that there.
They decided at a certain point, eh, we don't want the North Dakota thing in there.
Now, when Oswald goes to Russia, it's very interesting as well because he speaks to a number of different reporters that are there.
And oddly enough, some of those reporters are American.
And they're like, why are you defecting and all the rest?
And, you know, and this one woman in her notes writes, Oswald, you know, was in New Orleans, grew up in Texas, spent some time in New York and North Dakota.
That's in her notes.
So for years, they try to say, to blow this story off, Well, actually, she meant New Orleans, so she just said North Dakota.
You know, it's an honest mistake.
And then her notes came out.
She died, and the family let her notes out.
And one of the notes in her handwritten thing says, North Dakota.
It's not a mistake.
She wrote it that way.
And that tells me a lot because there's a North Dakota chapter in all this that's missing.
So, when they go for records pertaining to the knowledge that the FBI and the CIA had about Oswald and the JFK assassination, there's something wrong with the fact that they haven't run into the multiple Oswald lives and released that to the public because Oswald was definitely a deep, deep intelligence operation.
And there are ways at getting at that information.
There's no question.
So, the idea that, oh, you know, they put out some CIA files or whatever, that doesn't tell us a whole lot.
Now, the Patsy principle.
Okay, this is interesting.
When Oswald was taken into custody, he had two things on him that were very telling.
One of them is a bracelet that says Lee, the other is his Marine Corps ring.
Now, at a certain point during the photo ops and things, when they're kind of touting Oswald around, he holds up.
His wrists, and they're like, Look, he's doing a communist salute or whatever.
But in fact, he's flashing that Lee bracelet, which he just had was wearing that day.
He's decided I'm going to wear it.
And I believe this was to tell those people that he was working with that I'm the real one, that the dupe that's out there is a different guy.
And that's the famous pose.
But as you can see, the bracelet here that that's the Lee bracelet.
So these are signals being given in real time before he's taken out.
And I think that they are.
Very, very telling.
And what they're telling us is Oswald knew that they had a secondary player out there.
And that's why that day he decided to wear that Lee bracelet.
There's a number of things that we can learn historically just thinking about Oswald and the Kennedy case.
But they needed, in a way, Oswald was the ultimate model of the Patsy.
When they came out with the Robinson case, there were so many weird signatures that were like Oswald, as I mentioned at the top of the program.
The Mauser, of course, that was the first rifle found, according to the three officers.
One.
Two, the destroyed note, Hostie destroyed the note.
Patel now is saying there's a destroyed note that says everything.
The overlap was gigantic in terms of these symbols.
Some things, of course, are coincidence or whatever, but to see so many of these played out makes you think that they are actually, you know, Playing with a template there.
And there's no doubt that they've decided to go the route of giving us a story for this instead of giving us the facts.
Secret Service And CIA Overlap00:05:57
I have no question about that.
Whoever arranged this had it ready.
And that's part of the problem that I have with this case.
I'm going to go through a little more of what they have on Robinson.
But before I do that, I want to point this out in connection with Crooks.
And how this could overlap into a security situation like Robinson.
In 1970, and it was originally sought for in 1968, the Secret Service asked for a public law that would give them the ability to tap the Central Intelligence Agency for their events so that they could have CIA personnel working side by side with their Secret Service agents, say at the Democratic National Convention or things of this nature.
Now, the Central Intelligence Agency.
Before 9 11, they were only supposed to work overseas.
They weren't supposed to work here.
That was the FBI's job.
But this is the law that got put into place.
And I'm going to put this on the record for us.
It's Public Law 90 331.
And here's how it reads, just so we know what we're dealing with here.
To authorize the United States Secret Service to furnish protection to major presidential or vice presidential candidates, like Trump was in that event in Butler.
Memo The president from DCI subject the loan of technical countermeasures equipment to the Secret Service.
By reference, it suggested that the agreement between the CIA and the Secret Service.
Concerning presidential protection, be amended to add a provision which would allow the loan of CIA personnel to aid in the newly authorized protection for the presidential candidates or should state the persons to be protected in terms of the USCA if they're not president.
Okay.
That means in Butler, for example, Central Intelligence Agency could have been active in that group of protecting president, quote unquote.
But where we've had the CIA be bad actors in the past around this, the question never got asked were there any CIA personnel?
We know there were Homeland Security people there.
We know they were dropping the ball.
They know that they had crooks running all of these drones over the site beforehand, but the Secret Service didn't run any drones.
They said, oh, we couldn't find the technical setup.
Shucks.
We're only the top most elite force of security in the entire world.
But here, Thomas Crooks, this guy who just got out of high school, basically, He's able to fly drones before they do anything, and then they fall down on the job.
They allow President Trump to be shot at.
So that's a Secret Service standout.
There's no question about it.
And in fact, Beverly Cheadle lost her job as a result of it.
Now, one of the things I've pointed out is when you get around deep events like assassinations, you get COG personnel.
And that's what I found through the deep state work.
And that whole network comes out of the continuity of government program.
Over and over again.
So, those historical examples, the JFK assassination, Winston Lawson, Jack Creighton, they came directly out of the emergency COG program.
In other deep events in history, John Dean, the counsel for President Nixon, came directly out of COG.
One of the Watergate burglars himself came out of COG.
In the 80s, they had Oliver North, Iran Contra, the Doomsday Network, all of that stuff.
Those are all COG people.
Vice President Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld.
Rumsfeld was the CEO of a pharmaceutical company at the time.
He wasn't even a member of government, but he's busy writing the rules of COG in the 1980s.
So whenever you get around these deep events, you know, the financial coup d'etat in 2008, 2001, September 11th, Northcom, all these things, all COG.
So Homeland Security now, as I mentioned, is 270,000 employees.
It's growing to be one of the largest organizations that we have in the government.
But the middle of this little patch of land in Pennsylvania, where they almost had a presidential tragedy last July because the Secret Service supposedly dropped the ball, they had Homeland Security and Secret Service running it.
They never mentioned if there were CIA personnel.
Now they have a public law that gives them the ability to call in CIA personnel to help them run events like that.
Were there CIA personnel on the ground?
That's the question.
And then let's extend the question.
Since they mentioned that they can, with that public law, do it for presidents and vice presidents or for situations that they deem that are worthy of it, were there anyone on the intelligence side working security for the Kirk event?
It should be a vital bottom line consideration right off the bat.
Of course, they had private security.
They were aware of threats and they knew it was a tense thing with him in general and that he had become a target for certain types of people objecting.
To what he was putting forward with Turning Point.
So these are the questions that you would ask when they do these press conferences.
One, is that rifle then that they're showing in the New York Post that everyone is accepting, is that actually, do one of you law enforcement people vouch for that?
That's one.
Two, were there CIA personnel on the ground in that event?
Were there CIA personnel on the ground in the Butler event?
Cracks In The Empire Exposed00:03:08
This gets us into that crucial territory.
Three, the destroyed note basically is something that you had a witness kind of make up.
Isn't that correct?
That you felt it fit a narrative and you just had him say it.
You don't have any proof of a note because it was destroyed.
And then finally, didn't you massage the back and forth in the Discord?
That's why you didn't put the time stamps in there.
Those things immediately would give people a totally different view of both the Butler case and what we're seeing.
In the Kirk case.
And that's how you get to the bottom of these things.
So that's how we're going to solve that.
Now, I'm going to go way back in history, all the way back to 1914, to have us solve something about the nature of why these things are done in the first place and the secret groups that are behind them.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show deep, deep tonight.
It's great to have so many of you here for this very important transmission.
This is X Series 205, it's the assassination of America.
Which, as I said, comes from the Paris Flamand book.
That's the title.
And I'm going to get to Paris before we're done.
And it is the Patsy Principle Revealed.
We're going to be taking your questions here very shortly.
I want to remind you, of course, especially if you're new, go to darkjournalist.com.
Don't miss out on the opportunity to get on the newsletter list.
It's free and it helps us go back and forth without the social media censorship that we experience when we get around these very sensitive topics.
And it's understandable that they're sensitive.
However, The censorship is not so understandable, except that there's kind of a program there to do it.
But we can get around it and we have that direct pipeline.
Stand up and be counted.
Go to darkjournalist.com.
It takes literally 10 seconds.
And we'll let you know everything that's going on, including exciting interviews that you won't believe are coming up.
Fantastic mind blowing X series episodes, the docuseries.
It's all there and waiting for you in the newsletter.
Miss Olivia, you got it.
David Termina says, DJ, Charlie Kirk is different from any other deep state assassination.
Charlie, with as much potential as he had, wasn't an imminent threat, or was he?
Does this action reveal a crack in the empire?
Oh, yeah.
I would say that it's like the MLK assassination.
That is, he wasn't holding a public office, but he was very close to and influencing.
The political environment of the time and close to the government workings of these administrations.
And you have to kind of keep that in mind when you're looking at this as well, which is the MLK situation was different from how they were doing the assassination of President Kennedy, but they needed the Patsy principle.
RFK Assassination Patterns Revealed00:09:14
In the RFK case, when they had the MKUltra, Sirhan Sirhan, and of course I talked with RFK Jr. about what his own investigations revealed about Thane Eugene Caesar, and of course we did our own investigations.
Documentary on that as well.
But Eugene Caesar, of course, was an employee of Skunk Works for Lockheed, which is this elite division that deals with very, very exotic technology in UFO reverse engineering and everything else.
So this guy came out of the deep, deep end of the aerospace part of the deep state.
And he had only gotten the job, Caesar, that is, at the hotel where Kennedy was going to give his speech.
Three days before.
So, the Ambassador Hotel is going to host this event if Kennedy is in a neck and neck fight with Eugene McCarthy.
But if Kennedy wins, then he wins all the marbles, basically.
And they go to Chicago and they win there.
So, Kennedy was going to be the Democrat candidate for president.
And the Nixon people and the people who were behind Nixon were looking at this situation as their ultimate nightmare because they had lost to Jack Kennedy by a whisker in 1960.
And now here's Robert Kennedy, and the country was behind Robert Kennedy, and there was this whole wave of sentiment about his brother's assassination.
There's no way Nixon could have stood up and won against Bobby Kennedy.
It would have been extremely hard.
And I believe when this, because Bobby Kennedy decided at the last minute to get into that race, he was not announced as a candidate.
He was saying, I'm supporting the ticket, the Democrat ticket.
But LBJ was in so much trouble over Vietnam, and Bobby felt he's not going to win.
As a matter of fact, When LBJ faced off in 1968 against Eugene McCarthy, he faced off against him and he almost lost.
Let me tell you, McCarthy was a minor senator from Minnesota.
He was not incredibly well known, but he had the anti war youth vote behind him.
For him to almost beat LBJ and for LBJ to be beaten down by the Ted Offensive and other terrible things like that, Bobby was like, I can take the crown here.
But as soon as Bobby announces he's in, LBJ says, I'm getting out.
Because he can't have the blood of two Kennedy brothers on his hands.
So he can't be, oh, you know, I benefited from the first one and now I'm going to face off against the second one.
When they assassinate him, I'll be the reelected president.
He could not do it.
So he does a very unusual thing.
And I don't think any president has done this in history.
They all run for reelection for a second term.
And he said, I will not seek and I won't accept it if you draft me the presidency.
So he decided, I'm out.
As soon as he decides he's out, only a week later, MLK is assassinated.
MLK was going to throw his support behind Bobby Kennedy, and the two of them would have been unstoppable in that environment.
So, you know, you would have had a whole different history playing out there.
Instead, by the time you get to June, when Bobby Kennedy is coming in and winning the California primary, and basically that cements the Democratic.
Nomination for him in 68, he's going to be the candidate.
So you have to get him there.
You know, you can't wait around.
And so LBJ has already decided I'm out.
He already knows about what happened and the shenanigans that it took to get him in in the first place to take out Kennedy.
He can't do it again.
So the group there, that Robert Mayhew group is the one, and they were associated with Howard Hughes, and that whole deep state operation goes very, very deep.
I did a whole documentary on it.
Called X Protect the Aerospace UFO File Assassins.
And, you know, tremendous response to that.
What is that now?
2020?
I think it's 2021, maybe five years ago.
Incredible, unbelievable.
And what we've been able to do is go forward with that information.
And we talked to someone named John Meyer.
And John Meyer was Howard Hughes' right hand man.
And he talked all about how in the background, They knew that Mayhew had taken care of the situation and caused the assassination of Bobby Kennedy.
And it's interesting with Bobby Kennedy, you know, certainly Bobby Kennedy had a lot of enemies because of his going after the mafia and everything else.
But giving him the presidency, giving him the reins back, opened up the whole removal of Kennedy in the first place.
They could not have this situation happen.
And Garrison, actually, Jim Garrison, the DA of New Orleans, tried to warn Bobby Kennedy.
About this.
So that was the nature of the situation in 1968.
Interestingly enough, Thane Eugene Caesar, and this is something that John Meyer went on the record with, and that's in the documentary.
He said, Oh, I remember him from when I would go to Las Vegas and hang out with Mayhew and Hughes.
And Thane was around there.
He was kind of like their strongman, you know?
And so he's in with the Howard Hughes advanced technology Lockheed thing that never got figured out.
And then he's wearing a skunk work.
Look, You know, that's Ben Rich saying we have the technology to send ET home.
There's always a UFO signature in the middle of these things.
This is the crucial aspect to keep in mind.
There's an advanced technology signature whenever you get around the assassinations.
There's just no two ways about it.
And we need to look at that straight in the face, too, and say, why is there such an overlap with this?
And of course, we've done a number of shows on that.
Now, I want to go back into this historical piece.
To get us in the mindset of where the whole assassination principle comes from.
And does it go deep into not just these political forces, but how they operate inside of a secret society set up?
This is the crucial aspect we're going to get to now.
And you could only do it here on Dark Journalist X Series 205, everyone.
Thank you.
It's so great to have so many of you here.
We're going to get to your questions momentarily.
Before I do, Ms. Olivia, you're right.
All right, let's go there.
So I am an I and I. Can you respond about Israel having a motive?
And David Termina says, if Charlie had the courage to openly question the morality of Israel's conduct, perhaps he was tuned into the danger of the Stargate AI project.
Well, there's a lot with the Stargate AI thing.
The problem with assassinations, when you go after state actors, it'll never end.
You'll just, you know, the CIA, the first thing that they put out in relation to the Oswald assassination was that Cuba did it.
Then they said that Russia did it.
And then later, when you get around Iranian things, you remember the crooks thing, what they were putting out was Iran did it, right?
And they had a big thing there, so much so that actually candidate Trump threatened Iran with annihilation if they were taking him out.
They were telling him on the CIA side, yeah, they have a contract out on you, and all the rest.
So, the intelligence agencies to deflect from the deep state apparatus being called responsible for this will always choose a state actor.
Cuba, Iran, Israel, Russia, it doesn't matter.
But when you are in that territory, you are in a very diluted picture because state actors stay far away from the assassination action.
And it is the intelligence agencies that operate there.
So that's where you look first.
Remember, who's good?
Who's the best?
So, if you were looking for, you know, let's say there was this incredible shot that was pulled off, you would grab all the best riflemen around and say, where were they on that particular day?
Well, if you have the best organization for assassination in the United States of America and a big assassination takes place, you should at least look there.
So, were there CIA personnel on the ground there that day?
That's getting somewhere, getting answers like that.
And we don't have those answers because nobody's asked those questions until this show here tonight.
So, this is how you have to come at it.
Now, you know, you have all kinds of reasons and forces and different political hotspots in the world, and you can look at them all and weigh them out.
But in terms of Kirk, generally, you know, this is not somebody, I mean, I can picture some real, you know, pro Palestinian hotshots who, you know, if people on the Israeli side wanted to get rid of supporters of the Palestinians, They have a heck of a lot better candidates than Kirk.
The Archduke Grenade Setup00:08:43
So, no, I think that that's a meme pushed predominantly by Candace Owens.
And I think that her whole setup is all about that because there's not a lot of thinking going on there.
That is a promotion podcast pop click world.
And that's very different from the work that we do on this program.
Okay, we're going back in time.
Can you feel it?
What is the music for us to go back in time?
Diddle to do, diddle to do, diddle to do.
In late June, terrible incident in 1914, and there's a substantial, substantial figure who gets assassinated in a public street, and that is the Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
And they will say that a 19 year old who was half cocked and wanted to protect his nationalist honor and all the rest.
Went off half cocked and shot not only the Duke, but his wife as well, with all their security.
And there's incredibly sketchy things about that, including the fact that a grenade had been thrown at their caravan earlier in the day.
And the Duke was like, I can't believe this.
They're throwing bombs at us now.
He was back in the safe palace talking to the government and all the rest of it.
He didn't need to go out a second time.
But he decides, I'm going to go back out and I'm going to go see the people who were injured, who were in the carriage behind us by that grenade, and we're going to go to that hospital and visit them.
And so, you know, he's heading back and he's a very important and interesting figure as well, the way that he gets in.
And, you know, he's worthy of a separate show on his own, I can tell you.
But he also has a very interesting esoteric trajectory in the background.
But the trajectory of Europe would have changed had he not been assassinated.
Now, what happens is he says, I'm going to go back and I'm going to visit those people in that hospital.
So there's a general that's riding with him and a driver, and he says to the general, You know, I don't think we should go through the city, though.
We got a grenade thrown at us.
How about we take this back roads thing?
And the general says, Yeah, no problem.
That's what we're going to do.
But he never tells the driver.
So Ferdinand, as they're getting close to the city, he says, Hey, this isn't the route.
This is the wrong route.
What are you doing?
And he gets to a certain place and he tells the driver, Back it up, back it up.
And the driver is stalling, and the story is that, oh, his engine stalled.
In any case, that's where they assassinate the Archduke.
And now I'm going to do two things here.
I'm going to mention a couple of things from the official record, and then we're going to find from the work of Rudolf Steiner what that assassination was really all about.
We're going to extrapolate on the esoteric side the true meaning.
Of these assassinations, what they represent, not just on a physical level, but about that war going on in the background between the secret societies.
It's a crucial understanding point.
We keep that in mind as we go along here.
Okay.
So the Archduke comes and he's giving a scheduled speech at the town hall.
And the Archduke decided to visit the victims of this grenade attack, as I mentioned.
To avoid the city center, General Oscar Petraev.
Directed the royal car to travel straight along the Apple Quai to the hospital.
However, Petraev failed to inform the driver.
So he tells the Archduke, Hey, I have this whole other route, no problem, but he doesn't tell the driver.
So, right there, you have a very unusual setup.
On the way to the hospital, the driver, Logica, we'll just call him Logica, following the original plan, turned onto a side street where Princip, who was the same assassin that was throwing the grenades earlier, Happened to be standing in front of a delicatessen.
After Patoric shouted at him to stop, the general there, Loika, the driver, halted the car and began reversing.
As he did so, the engine stalled and the gears locked.
The assassin stepped forward.
He drew a model 1910 semi automatic pistol, fired twice at close range at the car.
The first bullet struck the Archduke in the neck, while the second hit the Duchess in the abdomen.
Both died shortly afterwards.
On July 13, 1914, Austro Hungarian official Frederick Wisner submitted a report concluding that there was no evidence to implicate a Serbian government in the conspiracy behind the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife in Sarajevo.
That is the Warren Commission, circa 1914.
The assessment communicated to Vienna confirmed that the Serbian state had not been involved in the plot.
Despite this, the Austro Hungarian government perceiving Serbia's nationalist ambitions as a direct threat.
To the stability of the multi ethnic empire, seized upon the assassination as a pretext for action against Serbia, which set off the conditions for the First World War.
Now, there's a very strange piece in here, and I think it's interesting how this rolls.
There's two very odd things here which aren't very often talked about, but I want to go back to after the grenade was thrown at the Archduke.
So, What he does is he goes, after a short rest to the governor's residence, the royal couple insisted on seeing all those who had been injured by the bomb at the local hospital.
Even though this grenade had been thrown at them, they had kind of the guts to go back out in public, which I think is very interesting.
And then that whole thing about the driver's itinerary and all this.
Now, Princep was sitting at a cafe across the street.
He instantly seized upon his opportunity, walked across the street, and shot the royal couple.
Pretty interesting when you look at this, because previous, just the November previous to this taking place, Our friend Franz Ferdinand is in England.
And guess what the date is?
November 22nd.
Now, he goes to Windsor Castle and he goes to meet with George V and Queen Mary at Windsor Castle.
He's going to stay for another week with the Duke of Portland.
When they arrived on November 22nd, he attended a service at the local Catholic church.
Franz Ferdinand, the Duke of Portland, went game shooting at the Welbeck estate, according to Portland's memoirs.
In the name of that memoir, Men, Women, and Things, this is what he said.
Ironically, one of the loaders fell down.
This caused both barrels of the gun he was carrying to be discharged, the shot passing within a few feet of the Archduke and myself.
I've often wondered whether the Great War might not have been averted, or at least postponed, had the Archduke met his death there and not in Sarajevo the following year.
Ferdinand was going to be assassinated by this accident.
Early on here, on November 22nd, 1913, while visiting with the Duke.
And it's a very interesting little addendum on history that the Duke himself is thinking, and the Duke of Portland says to himself, Oh, gee, I wonder if we had just bumped him off there, he wouldn't have had World War II.
So I thought that was a very strange and interesting twist.
And this is how it works when you get around the assassination piece, that there are setups to it, just like in the Kennedy case.
During his trip to Florida, there's a whole recording about how they're going to assassinate him there.
And as a result of the tip that they get from an FBI informant, they don't.
They cancel the motorcade.
And so the assassination does not take place that first week in November, but in three weeks later, they do get him.
Arthur Bremer And Political Removals00:05:51
Oddly enough, it is the Austrian mystic genius and Rudolf Steiner, who we have so many shows about Steiner here, who tells us some very interesting things about the background.
Of that assassination of the Archduke and how it relates to world history and how World War II and all these other things were put into play by the secret societies, and the assassination was crucial.
When we see his comments about the Archduke, and I'm going to read them here momentarily, then we can go into what takes place and the Kennedy assassination and the assassination pattern and the Patsy principle ever after.
That is going to give us a much different view on how the deep state is operating this.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show, it's X series.
205, The Assassination of America Revealed, The Patsy Principle.
We're going to be taking your questions right after the Steiner section, which goes deep on the esoteric roots of the secret societies, the battle going on there between the mystery schools, and how there's one unit there working to move the culture forward.
And then there's something else.
And we know all about the something else.
We're seeing it's very active right now.
Jonathan Kiner says, can you articulate the Patsy principle, please?
Well, when you operate in this fashion of needing to remove a public official or somebody on an influence scale, you know, everyone from, you know, there's the whole case about Arthur Bremmer and the 1972 election being assassinated because George Wallace was going to run again.
And there was a weird thing going on there where.
Wallace really, you know, when he ran as an independent, he had Curtis LeMay as his VP in 1968.
And they got, actually, they got 13% of the vote.
And they picked up a number of states and delegates.
And for some reason, the Nixon forces were very worried, even though there's a weak, weak candidate on the Democrat side, George McGovern, one of the weakest.
And it was, ended up being one of the biggest blowouts in history.
I think it is the biggest blowout.
Actually, it's the second biggest because Reagan over Mondale, I think, is the biggest.
Second biggest is.
Is Nixon over McGovern.
But, you know, so McGovern was terrible, but they were terrified, which also Watergate comes into this as well.
And what takes place there is Bremer shoots Wallace.
Wallace is the independent.
Wallace was also the governor who was segregationist.
And he would, after this accident, come back disabled and he would be a governor who would fight for, you know, integration rights and, and, You know, civil rights and things.
It's a very unusual story.
But in any case, Bremer himself was a weird case.
So that was the Patsy that they needed.
And what they found out during the Watergate hearings and things like that is that there were instructions from deep inside the Nixon administration as soon as this happened for E. Howard Hunt, who was the same people that were utilized during the Kennedy assassination, to go into the apartment, break into the apartment of Arthur Bremer and plant.
Democrat materials to show this guy's a Democrat.
Just like right now, the whole push in the liberal media was to prove Tyler Robinson was a MAGA person, which is ridiculous because all the information shows that he was just the opposite.
But they wanted this.
So the Nixon forces wanted everyone to think Arthur Bremer was a Democrat and that he had shot and how terrible those Democrats were shooting and taking out Wallace, and the sympathy would go to Nixon.
So, CIA Hunt gets there and he finds the place is already cordoned off and he has to scoot out of there before he's grabbed.
So, he talked about that openly in his own memoir, too.
So, you can see how this works.
I mean, things are planted all the time.
I've gone on the record before with a very unusual fact, but it's in the congressional record that E. Howard Hunt, before he was sent to prison for the Watergate affair, admitted to forging cables, pretending that is, that President Kennedy.
Had instructed the Central Intelligence Agency to assassinate President Diem of Vietnam, which took place three weeks before President Kennedy was assassinated.
President Kennedy never gave orders to assassinate a foreign leader.
And he certainly didn't want the Diem brothers assassinated, but the CIA did.
But they were up to their necks in it by the 1970s.
And so what they had him do were forge cables from Kennedy saying, Go ahead and assassinate President Diem of Vietnam.
Well, when people would go into the archive and say, Well, what was Kennedy's position on this?
They'd be like, Hey, look, I found this memo.
It says right here, signed by John Kennedy, and it says, Let's go get them.
Well, E. Howard Hunt went on the record and said, I forged those.
Those aren't real.
So you see how false the record can be.
You have to be careful with the record and what they tell you on the law enforcement level because the documents themselves can be forged, the conditions can be forged, the chat of Tyler Robinson and his boyfriend can be forged.
Right now, you have a suspect in custody.
That's it.
Forged Documents And Hidden Truths00:13:57
Keep that in mind as we go along here.
Now, to Steiner's interpretation.
And get this this is going to take us to a very different place.
Are you ready?
Wouldn't you like to fly in my Steiner balloon?
Steiner gives such rich insight on the esoteric level for the assassination of Franz Ferdinand that I think it's going to give us a lot of insight here.
Quote, may I remind you, I've often mentioned it, that the death of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria is one of those concealed events of the present day.
Despite all that occurred on the external physical plane, I have stressed especially that if the physical and spiritual worlds are taken together, then for them as a totality, there was something present before the assassination of Franz Ferdinand that became different after the event.
It does not matter in such cases what things look like in external Maya.
What occurs inwardly is the important thing.
As I told you, what rose up out of the soul of Franz Ferdinand into the spiritual worlds became a focal point for very strong, powerful forces.
And much of what is now happening is connected with the very fact that a unique transition took place between life and so called death, so that this soul became something quite different from what other souls.
Become.
This is strange already.
But he's telling us, and he has said this as a background, that there's something very unusual about the Duke right off the bat.
He's already coming out of a mystery center.
So he is to lead a different Austro Hungarian empire.
I've said that someone who's lived for recent decades in a state of spiritual consciousness.
Must know that one of the main causes of today's painful events is the fear in which the whole world was drenched, the fear that individuals had of each other, even though they did not know it, and above all, the fear that the different nations had of one another.
If people had seeing eyes with which to track down the cause of this fear, they would not talk as much nonsense as they do about the causes of the war.
This is World War I we're talking about, which he's in the middle of.
And by the way, Steiner's saying, Hey, look, I'm putting all this out now because.
Anthroposophy and the mystery schools, you know, what's the point if we're going to have World War I?
I'm putting it all out.
So, continuing here, he says if people had seeing eyes, they'd know what the real causes were.
It was possible for this fear to be so significant because it is woven in as a state of feeling into what I described to you yesterday by means of examples.
Please regard this as a sketch, but drenching everything in this aura of fear.
That soul was connected in a certain particular way with this aura of fear.
Trans Ferdinand was embodying all the feelings of the nation at that point, their fear of war, their fear of the other countries, and all the rest of it.
And he had a strength, apparently, that was rising up to transform the entire region.
So he gets targeted by these groups that are looking at him because they want terror campaigns, they want the fear, they want the war.
Therefore, that violent death was in no way merely an external affair.
I told you this because I was able to observe it, because for me, It was a particularly significant event that is connected with many aspects of what is going on at the present.
I do not suppose that such things, which obviously ought to be kept within our circle, have been talked about all over the place outside our circle.
The fact is, however, that I have been speaking about these things in various branches since the beginning of the war.
And remember, Steiner's right in the middle of it.
There are witnesses who could verify this.
Hermann Barr's book, which is called Ascension.
Very interesting.
Appears much later, only quite recently, yet in it there appears a passage that I shall quote in a moment.
And I would ask you to pay attention to the following fact.
Within the circle of anthroposophical spiritual science, there are indications that are given about an event that is spiritually very important.
Then a novel written at a later date is published, and it's Barr's novel.
And I'll explain who Barr is in a moment.
But in it, there is found a character who always appears to be rather foolish.
He's actually a prince in disguise.
He appears as a foolish person who performs lowly tasks.
From a poster, he's living in a rural area when all of a sudden he learns of the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
Whereupon he makes the remark which almost causes him to be lynched and leads to his being locked up for any police force would naturally be convinced that somebody making such a remark immediately after the assassination must be party.
To the plot.
So I'm going to explain this a little bit, but there's a character in this novel who is by this famous author in the period, Hermann Barr.
Hermann Barr operates around anthroposophy, and Steiner's giving all these lectures.
This guy is in the audience and he's taking notes and stuff, and he comes out with this novel.
In the novel, he has a character named Franz, who is actually a prince, somebody sent from a mystery center, who's under Undercover as peasant, basically.
But when the assassination happens, he spits out all this information and he says, Oh, it wasn't just one person, it was this network.
And he gives all this information, and the townspeople around him are like, This guy must have been involved.
Get the police.
And they almost lynch him.
So he's basically, you know, kind of a mystery figure himself who has incredible psychic knowledge of this event.
Let's go a little further.
Though there are many miles in between, the one event having Happening in Sarajevo and the other taking place in Salzburg.
Nevertheless, to the police, in its wisdom, that man must be a party to the plot.
Remember, this is just in Hermann's novel.
So Hermann Barr writes this novel after being associated with Steiner.
He's a famous novelist and he puts this in here.
You can understand why I find it to some extent significant that such a novel should contain not only general echoes but should lead to a point as concrete as the death of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
This shows that these things are far more real than is generally supposed.
Just such things as this must show us that what takes place on the physical plane is often no more than a symbol of what is really happening behind the scenes of earthly life.
For if you read about what has occurred in connection with these events, in connection with this assassination, without appealing to the spiritual aspect, it will be impossible for you to understand that someone can be led to a place with such significance on the matter.
But it is not yet possible today to speak about these things without some reservation.
As yet, not everything connected with these things can be expressed.
There are mystery school rules, basically, is what he's saying.
Seen quite externally, why was Franz Ferdinand rather important?
He was important because, in his being and all of his inclinations, you must take the external manifestation as a symbol of what lived within.
He was the external expression of certain streams.
In him, there lived something which, only if it had been able to free itself, bore the deepest understanding for the individual development of the Slav people.
You might indeed call him an intense friend of all that belongs to the Slavs.
He understood, or perhaps I should say, something living in him understood what forms would be necessary for the social life of the Slavs if they were to develop as individual peoples from a spiritual point of view.
Matters become particularly delicate and tricky if they start interfering with streams and counting on methods that are connected in some way with occult streams using secret brotherhoods, which exist all over the world.
Some are more profound, as are these about which I spoke today and will speak tomorrow.
Others only touch on these, but even though, as they do touch on them, they must be seen as vessels through which occult streams flow.
And finally, the society whose discussion was disbanded after the death of the Archduke, Franz Ferdinand, the Serbian society, the name was Narodna Obrana, or the Black Hand.
That was the actual successor.
To an earlier secret brotherhood, having changed its methods only slightly.
I am stating no more than facts.
Of course, Steiner goes even deeper, but what he's pointing out here is there's something so entrenched about the political situation and the secret societies that we have an assassination guild, as it were, that's an interface.
And when a personality like Ferdinand or John F. Kennedy is coming in to bring And rise up the people, and it gets in the way of what these occult streams are doing.
That individual needs to be removed.
So he's talking about this.
There's another aspect around that, which I'm going to get to in a different episode.
But for tonight, what I want us to consider is that these things run much deeper than they are portrayed.
You know, some creep getting his rocks off on a rooftop, taking out his favorite political enemy.
You're going to have to go a lot deeper and also.
You know, the junk that you're being fed by the media and by the law enforcement in this case and by the feds is not accurate.
We don't know what's accurate yet.
What we know is they have a suspect in custody.
So we need these real facts as we've raised tonight.
I have more quotes here, but Miss Olivia, now what do you got?
Okay.
Nevermore says Does DJ think it's possible the shooter of Charlie Kirk was MKUltra, AKA Araman Spiritual Force, the Black Hand?
Well, I think we're raising the idea that these things are coming from a deeper place than just a disenfranchised group or, you know, a social deviant or whatever it is.
So that the influences on a presidential level in particular, we can see very obviously.
On someone with a great deal of influence, you know, and I think that someone like Kirk had the ability to be like an MLK type figure and have enormous influence.
Remember, Gandhi, you know, he wasn't holding public office.
He was the influence.
He was the one who brought the independence for India.
We have to think about these figures and understand the history around them and why people would want to interfere with their rise.
And how, when they're looking out, you know, just like a lot of these mystery schools looked out and saw Helena Blavatsky, the possibility that, uh oh, you know, she's going to be born.
This is a force to be dealt with.
And they tried to concoct a plan knowing that she was going to be born.
That's pretty deep.
That's pretty deep.
You know, that's like the Terminator Mystery School style.
And it's a reverse engineering of these cosmic forces that these groups have access to this type of information.
So it's a factor to be looked at to understand the wider implications of why these forces in the background are dueling with each other.
And it's a political situation, but it references something deep going on in the background.
Yes.
Nance Hardwick, I think it's sketchy that the funeral is on the eclipse, one of their weird rituals.
Well, you know, I just wish them all the best in placing him to rest.
And I, you know, I think the, I mentioned that the independent pop click version of the independent media failed the stress test.
Around this, because they show that they don't have a lot of heart and that they're, you know, they're vying for their own power things.
You know, I think a lot of forces reveal themselves in this period of a week, and that it should be for the wise observer useful information, as it were.
I'm going to read, I have another thing to read here, and then we're going to go to your questions.
How does that sound?
Whatever.
Excellent.
I like it.
I'm sorry.
I'm disgusted.
Oh, yeah.
I know.
This has been a really tough night in the ideas room.
Well, I'll tell you, it would have been very easy to set it on subscriber and sort of really keep the part to the dark journalist subscribers.
But we threw it open to everyone.
And so we got a lot of trolls who like to come in and cause disruption.
But, you know, at the end of the day, you haven't disrupted a damn thing.
Evidence Tampering And Deception00:07:14
Well, disrupted me and my night.
Well, the truth is, though, you got through it and you made it through.
And to be honest with you, we know that.
Ultimately, nothing can really disrupt you because, you know, certainly not these types.
I want to point this out because, gee, I have a few things here.
I just want to say this.
The thing about the note and Hostie, I want to really put a little more clothes on it, a little more covering, a little more background.
Because Hostie was an FBI official, like Patel is an FBI official.
In the case of the assassination, Patel has put forward the destroyed note meme, which is bunk.
Because if you don't have the note, then as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't exist.
Because you can't prove it.
You just have enhanced interview techniques.
So you got aggressive with the fluff guy and he told you whatever you wanted to hear.
That's not evidence.
So I'm going to show you how they did this and what was behind it.
And I'm going to read a couple of quotes from Professor Scott's book, which is called The Deep Politics.
Now, there's one.
Oh, yeah.
The FBI undoubtedly tried to ensure that the Warren Commission could reach the same conclusion.
Hoover even intervened at the Washington Post to block a proposed editorial calling for the establishment of such a presidential commission.
He claimed that given the FBI's intensive investigation, a further review would only muddy the waters.
Now, it's interesting because the water was being muddied by all levels.
The Warren Commission could cover up the crime, but the FBI was afraid even of that.
And I think they decided, okay, as long as you have Alan Dulles in there, even though Kennedy fired him, we'll be happy.
Later, when the commission member Alan Dulles warned his old CIA colleague James Angleton that the Warren Commission was considering hiring its own investigation staff, Angleton passed the warning along to the FBI and the FBI Deputy Associate Director Alan Belmont.
He noted that the commission should be discouraged from having an investigative staff as a first step moving to limit the number of copies the First secret FBI report was made available to the commission.
They were trying to hoard the information and just have those guys be a plastic front, just in case, like there were dissenters to the Warren Commission, it was never publicly stated until after the report, years after.
When it came out, it didn't say this guy dissents, that guy dissents.
Two different dissenters on the Warren Commission who didn't believe the magic bullet and all that other fairy tale.
This is a This is by no means an accident, but Justice Department policy that the Warren Commission found itself dependent on the facts in the FBI, which had already decided that Oswald is the one who committed the assassination and that no one else was involved.
This dependent made it virtually impossible for the Commission to check out independently published allegations backed by a hearsay report that the name and phone number of FBI agent James Hostey were in Oswald's address book, that Oswald was an FBI informant.
The FBI, when it learned of the commission's interests in Oswald's position, pre assassination, and his FBI contacts, they did belatedly confirm that, in fact, Hostie, his name was in the address book.
Earlier, however, the FBI had provided a powerful typewritten transcript of Oswald's address book in which the Hostie entry was omitted.
So they took this out of the evidence.
The FBI was like, we can't have one of our own guys in his book.
So they literally tampered with the evidence.
So, you have to understand, we find this out decades later, but the evidence was tampered with.
So, in the Patel case with Robinson, we're at a very early stage with this, but you see how things can just be fixed.
Just like the chat, the Discord chat doesn't make any sense.
It is massaged, put in place.
That's why there's no timestamps there.
That's why it's here's how I did it and all the evidence against me, right?
So, we have to understand there's a track record of deception.
And we can't wait, you know, 20, 30 years to find that out.
We need to get to the bottom of those things now.
All right, a little more.
The House committee confirmed in 1979 that the hostie entry had been deleted in the retyping of the memo.
It called the incident regrettable.
But trivial.
No, it's not trivial.
If the assassin of the president has an FBI agent's number in his address book, that's a pretty big deal.
FBI documents released in 1979 show other instances in which key information was either altered before it reached the Warren Commission or withheld altogether.
That's what you want to watch for in this case.
And we're starting to see signs of it already.
Now, a little more on Hostie and the destroyed note.
William Sullivan, who investigated the Hostie Oswald matter for Hoover, later told Kurt Gentry that he had no doubts that Hoover ordered the destruction of the note.
That's the FBI director, no?
He also recalled that some other documents were missing, the nature of which he could not recall.
One possibility, which we shall explore in chapter 16, is that Oswald was indeed an FBI informant, as Carlos Bringier had rightly guessed, and that in Dallas, James Hostey, the FBI liaison in gun running cases, was using Oswald to investigate gun running by Odeo, Sylvia Odeo, and other Cuban groups.
Odeo was related to a big Cuban resistance figure, millionaire.
If so, Oswald and Hostie would have just been investigating the gun running of Odio's Cuban group and Juan Martin.
So it goes off into this other thing about John Martino.
It's a very interesting character in all this.
But the upshot here is that the Hostie story of getting the note at the FBI, and there are people at the FBI who were like, Oswald came in and left the note.
Then you get the note and then you destroy it.
So, whatever the note said, you can make it up.
You can say, oh, he said, stop bothering me or whatever.
And one of the interesting things is at first they were like, Oswald says, leave me alone or I'll blow up the FBI.
And then they decided, oh, we can't run with that, I guess.
Thinly Veiled Official Explanations00:03:51
So, you can see the misinformation wheels turn.
They decided on a certain story and that's it.
So, you always have to go back to what is the evidence?
What are the facts?
What's been tampered with?
And even documents can be tampered with, DNA can be tampered with.
You have to have a very foolproof approach.
Video footage can be tampered.
If you have the video footage from the Robinson event staring directly at that roof, they should release it because it would prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was somebody up there shooting.
And then you could tie that directly to Robinson.
Instead, you have all this weird half baked stuff somebody jumping off that roof with a bendable thing.
Doesn't look like there's any rifle in there to me.
And all of the weirdness of the phony Discord and all the rest of it.
They're trying to patch this together without presenting actual evidence, and the media is buying it.
That's why you see the New York Post and all the rest of it.
But they're being careful because no law enforcement people are, for example, confirming the picture of the New York Post, as I mentioned earlier.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
Now we're talking.
This is Dark Journalism.
You're going deep, and it's X Series 205 The Assassination of America Revealed.
I haven't forgotten Paris Flamand.
I'm going to mention him tonight and quote from him.
I have his book right here.
And his book was eliminated from history.
Go ahead and try to find it, as it were.
Miss Olivia, before I go any further, Europe.
MEON TV says Tyler Robinson is from a Mormon family.
Any thoughts on Mormonism and occult and intelligence agency connections?
Oh, no question.
Well, what happened?
I mean, Mormonism is fascinating right from the outset because Joseph Smith is seeing angels and finding ancient documents, and, you know, the stuff kind of looks Egyptian, and it's all upstate New York and Vermont, and, you know, then it marches across the country, and Utah becomes its.
Power base.
There's all kinds of unusual things about Mormonism.
And most importantly, I mean, there's so many honest people, you know, just trying to find the Latter day Saint movement, you know, who are involved with it.
But I'm just talking about these external things that try to infiltrate and all the rest of it.
And part of that infiltration over the years has been the Central Intelligence Agency.
And they've gotten an incredible stronghold on Mormonism and the Mormon church, unfortunately.
So, yeah, you have to look for that.
But of course, When we look at Tyler Robinson's own history, we get into interesting territory because his uncle was special forces, right?
Got that one out.
The uncle was deeply involved in the military.
And then you also, you know, his family profile, we don't know a great deal about it.
We know that he had younger brothers and his parents, you know, they wiped their Facebooks and all the rest of it.
But, um, They have pictures of him young with guns and stuff like that.
And yet the grandmother was like, oh, he was afraid of guns.
He didn't shoot guns.
So there's some disconnect in the story that they've given us.
Also, where was all the practicing going on for Robinson and his incredible shot at Kirk?
You know, there's not a lot of explanations here.
Very thinly, thinly veiled evidence, and everyone.
On the independent side, you know, and on the mainstream side, has accepted a lot of real bunk.
So, hopefully, that situation changes as more comes out.
Covering Tracks With Manipulation00:10:27
Of course, you know, it should be carefully gone through, responsibly gone through.
And, you know, running over a cliff, as we mentioned earlier, is not the way to do it.
And looking for the intelligence influence, since the intelligence agencies are the number one forces.
Who are well equipped and well adept at assassination would be something first off to do.
I think that that's forgiven.
And I think next up, when you look at these groups and the groups that would have been involved, you have to determine right off the bat this guy was not working alone.
And he may not have been working at all.
This is the Patsy principle.
Right now, he's just a suspect.
And if you look at the Oswald case and you go deep in there, Anyone who's an expert that I've ever talked to doesn't think, who's really on top of it, Peter Dill Scott, Jim Garrison, all those, they don't think Oswald fired a shot.
So you can see how images can be portrayed to us that aren't real.
Now, I'm not saying we should be cynical about everything, but they need to prove the case.
You can't show a phony picture and say New York Post says it, but not have law enforcement get behind it.
You cannot refer to a destroyed note as evidence when you don't have it.
You know, that's not evidence.
So, you know, you can't massage dialogue in a Discord chat.
That's not evidence.
So there's a lot of problems.
Big, big.
This case.
Yes.
Dan says, DJ, is there anything to the reports of N888KG Bombardier jet leaving the Provo airport with a disabled ADS beep transponder less than an hour after the shot is fired?
Yeah.
What's the follow up on that story?
Well, look, whenever you get a transponder that doesn't respond, it's very strange.
Very, very strange.
That's the whole 9 11 thing.
Suddenly, oh, they turned off the transponders, but nobody did anything about it.
And they didn't call in the proper forces because, you know, oh, they couldn't get in touch with the Secretary of Defense.
Totally ridiculous in 9 11.
But in terms of the flight, there have been a couple of different explanations for it.
So, officially, I haven't dismissed it, but I don't think automatically because that flight took off.
The only thing that's suspicious is that the transponder was turned off.
So it's inconclusive, is how I would look at it.
Hopefully, you get more information on it.
Yes.
Traditionally, you'd go to a safe house anyway.
Yeah, absolutely.
Well, we know the whole Dairy Queen thing.
You know, there he is hanging out six hours later.
I'm just saying, if it was someone else.
Yeah.
Oh, yes.
You know?
Yes.
Then you let everything blow over.
You let the patsy get caught.
And then you casually leave the country.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
And, you know, That whole thing in the chat, I have to read just a couple of things of that because just a little bit, because I think of it as arc absurd.
And when it gets arc absurd, that's when I think we're in.
I mean, that's some kind of territory.
One of the things that they had to say in there, which stood out to me, was the whole thing about, oh, my old man is going to be, you know, PO'd if I don't get that rifled.
I mean, you know.
I don't think 22 year olds say my old man.
No, I don't know if I copied this down.
I'm looking for it, but somebody said that running it through AI, like MPT, was written by a 50 to 65 year old law enforcement officer.
Yeah, I know.
And, you know, what was next?
Was he going to say, like, hey, these dogs are barking?
You know, I need some rest.
I don't know.
I mean, that didn't hold up for me at all.
Yeah, a boomer cop.
It didn't.
And what's weird is they've come through with some very odd things around the chat where they've put out, well, you know, something, the word was kind of like reconstructed.
So was this reconstructed from the fluff guy's memory who you try to beat the truth out of him?
You know, that's not evidence.
I don't know.
I don't know what's going on there, but.
The whole Patel FBI investigation on this, the self congratulations, the constant referencing to 33 hours, you know, how weird can you get?
You know, you don't have to say 33 hours.
Why do you keep saying 33 hours?
Are you trying to stoke conspiracy theories?
Since 33 is a Masonic number, it has all this occult symbolism, you know, say 32 and a half.
But 33.
It's like a day and a half.
I mean, you know.
Yes.
It's an absurd thing to say.
Jonathan Kiner said Charlie Kirk in Gematria is 33.
Oh, whoa.
Well, yeah.
I'm going to actually close this section with a couple of Oswald things.
In fact, I think we kind of covered the text.
In fact, one of the things I like to show is that the pictures that they were putting out about Oswald in his backyard were also, you know, flashed on the cover of Life magazine and all the rest of it.
Now we can look at it and see it's stupid Photoshop of 1960s variety, and yet it convinced a nation that this guy was holding a rifle, a pistol on his head, and a communist manifesto.
I am guilty, guilty, guilty.
Well, there was a policeman who was a military intelligence guy who had just come on to the Force a couple of months before the Oswald, you know, the whole accusation around Oswald shooting President Kennedy.
And he comes in with all this.
This is Roscoe White.
And he had actually been at Sugi, just like Oswald had been.
And so when he dies, his wife goes through his stuff.
And remember that picture of Oswald and the whole backyard thing?
Well, she found this.
And of course, she noted afterwards that, well, Roscoe was actually the photographic expert for the Dallas police at the time.
That was part of his job as a cop.
And there, in fact, is his kind of prefab version of putting the Oswald backyard photos together.
So remember, that's 1960s evidence.
That's what they were able to sell them, and they still use it.
But, you know, it's incredibly debunkable and very easy to see that.
And I think we've put that across.
But when you look at it, this is what they're willing to do to cover their tracks.
And they have the ability to get people to go along with them.
So, my general position is not to accept what they've put forward so far and not to go over a cliff with what somebody else might think it is or inject other things like state actor.
The important thing is to get to the facts of what's going on here.
And if we can at this point, it just seems like.
You know, what can you believe and from whom?
Yes, yes, it's an excellent point.
Remember that all of the official experts in the Oswald case, all of the, you know, holding the official line, the official story, all said that Oswald couldn't have known David Ferry.
David Ferry was, he worked for the CIA, he worked for the mafia, he did hypnosis, he was into mind controlled, he, you know, recruited people for intel.
That's what he did.
He was a drug runner.
And, you know, they said it for years and they used all this evidence.
They were like, well, he wasn't in the Civil Air Patrol at the same time.
He couldn't have even known him.
This is a conspiracy, all the rest of it.
Then one picture shut them up.
And there it is.
And what you see in that picture, this blew away Posner and all those ridiculous debunker creeps, you know, that's Lee Harvey Oswald.
And over here is David Ferry.
And in fact, there are records, and he was in Derry Ferry's unit for a year and a half.
Well, that's a pretty good amount of time to recruit him into intelligence.
And that's exactly where that comes from.
So Oswald was in Barry's Civil Air Patrol unit.
But for 40 years, they financed on the intelligence side people to go out to the media and say, no, these other people are, you know, making up conspiracies in their basement or whatever.
But in fact, those people had the genuine article, the genuine facts.
So you have to get, like I said, you have to go right down that middle line in order to get the truth.
Yes, Miss Olivia.
S.B. Harkin, did they tell Robinson he was being recruited and instead he's a patsy?
Oh, yeah.
They could have told him a lot of things.
He could have been under mind control from the word go.
We don't know a lot about what he was doing.
They said that in technical college, which is where he was, which is why part of that, oh, he was radicalized, doesn't hold up for me.
Get radicalized at a technical college?
I don't know.
I don't think so.
I think what we're seeing there is someone who was young, impressionable, easy to manipulate, and that they could hang a story on.
Now, they could have manipulated him into wanting to do this or thinking he was going to be able to take that shot, but they got somebody else a heck of a lot better to do it, in my opinion.
So, you know, people who get impulses to do things usually, you know, security grabs them.
Young Minds Easy To Manipulate00:05:25
I have a very interesting picture here.
Let's see if I can pull this out before we're done.
But.
If you go back to 1975, there are in fact two different incidents where they try to take out President Ford, and they're both women.
How's that for a stretch?
So they're responding to, like, you know, hey, women are on the rise.
Let's give them their own female assassin.
Our LeFemme Nikita for the ages.
And here it is, actually.
That is Ford being somebody pulling a gun out on Ford in 1975.
And it turns out that it was Squeaky Fromm.
Squeaky Fromm was one of the Manson women and the Manson family.
And she had been let out temporarily.
And somehow, in the middle of all this, she has a gun.
She knows right where Ford is and she pulls the gun out.
Now, very interestingly, if you go back, And study that period of time, you're going to find out one that Ford was put in not being elected as vice president or elected as president.
So, you know, Ford got in because Richard Nixon's VP got into trouble.
And so he was appointed VP.
No one voted for him.
And then Nixon gets into trouble.
He's removed.
And so Ford, who's never been elected VP or president, becomes president.
And what does he do?
He selects Nelson Rockefeller as vice president.
And as soon as he gets Nelson Rockefeller as vice president, Blamo, two different assassination attempts that almost succeed.
And Squeaky, the only thing that she had to say later, they had some Playboy interview or something with her.
And she said there was a conspiracy deeper with this, and she never said what it was.
But obviously, she was a really good mind control candidate to use.
Manson had already mind controlled her after all.
And then Manson had a history of being mind controlled through that whole period and then pretending to be a hippie.
Remember, this guy wasn't even a hippie.
He was already in his mid 30s when all that stuff took place.
And he had just glommed on that whole thing as an identity.
So there was a lot, a lot of mental manipulation.
That is the MKUltra program.
It's right in the heart of these assassinations, whether it's Squeaky Fromm, Mark David Chapman.
you know, John Hinckley Jr., they're all mind controlled.
There's no question about it.
And very often, the people involved don't have any shooting skills.
You know, even Oswald was known as a terrible shot.
So, what you need is a profile.
And that profile needs to say, this person is disgruntled with the world.
They have mental issues.
You know, they're lonely and they have anger toward a political figure.
You know, and in the case of Hinckley, it was really interesting because it was, I'm in love with Jodie Foster.
I'm going to kill Reagan for you.
You know, how is that going to get you, Jodie Foster?
And, um, But there's a lot, you know, there's a lot of things just like Chapman, you know, I'm going to take down Lenin.
There are a lot of crisscrosses if you study it, and we could be here all night discussing those connections.
I'd be happy to do it, in fact.
But one of those connections in the case of Chapman and Hinckley is the World Vision Church.
And of course, Hinckley was close to the bushes.
He was, in fact, planning to have.
Um, he there was a note that Hinckley was going to have dinner, his father was going to have dinner with the Bushes the following week.
So, you know, they were close, and Hinckley's father and Hinckley's family supported Bush, they were big time, you know, oil people in the Republican Party.
And they sent Hinckley off around the world on the world vision tours with the churches.
And they did the same thing with our friend Mark David Chapman, they had these guys ready to use at any time.
You know, Hinckley, who they released him, I think, a couple years ago.
And, you know, he has no memory of any of this stuff.
You know, Mark David Chapman thinks he's guilty.
The evidence in the Mark David Chapman case, a guy just came out with some deep, deep research.
And I've always heard things around this case that were like this.
But none of the Lenin case ever came up.
And then people think in the back of their heads, well, you know, Lenin, he was a celebrity, he got killed.
Lenin was so politically active before.
He'd taken five years off, yes, but he was a political force.
And as we did in the last program, we went through that and how Chapman doesn't make any sense the way he's portrayed because he's a world traveler.
You know, he's hanging out in Beirut, you know, in 1977, 1978.
AI Factors In Conspiracy Scenarios00:13:19
No way.
You know, and then he shows up in New York living a great life.
You know, he's got all this money.
He's hiring escorts.
He's living in a posh hotel.
He's hanging out outside the Dakota.
Where's he getting all that money?
This guy worked for $3.25 an hour.
So somebody is putting these people into position when they need them.
That's the fact.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
It's X Series 205 Assassination of America Reveal.
We've gone deep, deep in here.
There's still a couple of things I want to get to, but I want your questions first, Ms. David Termina.
DJ, supposedly Robinson's father received $1.2 million as a reward for turning his son in.
Isn't this just a naked bribe that suggests a complex intelligence operation?
I thought he turned that down.
I think he neither got it nor turned it down.
I just think it's not active.
So, that story, you know, you need a little more, you know, when they publish something like that, they need actual details for us to take it seriously.
And we need to go to the whole article to see exactly what their sources are because I'm showing you that there's a lot of obfuscation in this case.
And most of the stuff that's been pinging around is misinformation.
A lot of it comes from the podcast world because they love to drive the audience and they have incredible advertising dollars pumping them up, pumping them up, but they're not saying anything that's useful.
So you have to go back and adopt a research point of view.
You have to go into a deep mind again.
You have to find your inner Peter Dell Scott.
You have to find your inner Paris Flaman to get to any bottom on this because otherwise.
You know, that pod click thing, the post clip, pop click, I'll do it eventually.
The pop click world is being driven.
There's incredible money behind those podcasts and their very superficial treatment of these very deep subjects.
So you got to be careful because you're in a swamp, you know, and make sure you get the good, potent, solid information from solid sources and make your own decisions at the end of the day.
Yes.
I'm going to bundle these.
These are really.
Okay.
David Tamina, more than anything else, Charlie was known for his ability to engage with those with whom he disagreed.
It seems like they want to destroy that concept and have us go to war with ourselves.
Yes.
Nena says, if this game of the opsters is about creating more separation and hate, do you think it's being successful rather than what Charlie Kirk wanted to talk about, which is Jesus?
And David Allen, doesn't it seem that a lot of Americans so passionately Republican or Democrat are radicalized now?
Oh, yeah.
Well, there's a program to radicalize everybody.
For the war of all against all, right?
They did it with the COVID op.
They've done it with other things.
They do it with the political division.
You know, they had Obama come out and instead of really bringing a message of reconciliation after a terrible event, he came out and took shots and was like, you know, the extremism of Trump and all this stuff, you know, that's not presidential.
And so they're all just amplifying their own thing.
And that, you know, there is a clash with really big forces that have really big money.
So they're highly dangerous.
And the way to avoid getting caught up in that whirlwind is not to say, oh, I won't pay any attention.
I've seen this a lot.
Like I've said, I pointed this out at the beginning of the program.
There are people who are like, you know, have some status, and they're like, don't even pay attention to this case.
It's a joke.
It's a circus.
It's the Reichstag fire.
And I'm like, come on.
You know, it's a major, major assassination of a major figure right in the heart of.
America at a university, you know, you have got to get to the bottom of this.
And the whatever law enforcement is keeping back needs to be out, you know, because they're obviously holding a lot back.
And I want to know, you know, what that is.
And I don't want to go over the cliff with anybody's theory, but I do want those answers about the intelligence people and if there were intelligence people.
Who were contract agents or whatever on the scene?
I think that that is the type of information they can give us.
And I'd like to see those questions asked at the White House thing or when Patel and the Utah governor and people like that come out, you know, who was there doing security?
And I understand that, you know, Kirk understood very well that he needed security.
And they are, though, to go back to your question, they're trying to create a hostile environment where.
One person's, you know, lifestyle or whatever is meant to be something that you will go over the line and commit violence toward somebody else having a different point of view about it.
They're trying to support that thing, you know, and they have their own superiority complex.
They have their own brainwashing, Netflix and all that other stuff, you know, which is always showing a certain type of person in the villain, you know.
So they're trying to, um, There's a number of groups that are operating trying to motivate groups against each other where they can get the upper hand.
And this goes on in the world of finance.
It goes on in media.
It goes on in politics.
But the manipulation is at a real fever pitch for some reason.
And part of that is one group lost the ballot box this time.
Take the power back by other means.
So that's part of the problem.
And then with the group that came in, the Trump administration, they're getting, there's a lot of manipulation around them of the tech sector trying to basically dominate their moves.
And we saw that early on with the Elon thing.
So you have to be very careful.
Remember, the Republicans only have a tiny majority in the House and a tiny majority in the Senate.
You could easily see Adam Shift as majority leader next year if you don't do things correctly.
Or if you piss off your own base, pardon my language, by trying to come in with heavy laws, hate speech law, or some nonsense like that.
And again, I think it's important that the liberal, the corporate media is trying to manipulate the situation.
You know, they don't want to deal with the terror of what took place in the Kirk assassination.
They'd rather have you cry crocodile tears for Jimmy Kimmel, you know.
So it's a sick environment in that sense.
But the health of it, the way to get through it, is to get them to present the facts.
You know, that gets us into a different plateau.
And there are enough people in this country with empathy.
That these groups that they're trying to promote that are showing no empathy and no heart and, you know, celebrating terrible things that happen to other people, you know, it makes them less relevant.
I'll put it to you that way.
And so, you know, the empathy is a big part of our human spirit in America and around the world.
Yes.
Can we talk about motivations of this administration now about declaring Antifa?
A terrorist organization.
Well, I did.
I just hit on the whole speech thing.
I don't think, you know, look, in the period we were talking about, like 60s, 70s, and 80s, you had things like the Black Panthers and stuff like that.
And you had different programs against them.
I don't think it's tricky.
You're going to have to approach it with a real good legal framework and you're going to have to track it directly.
Now, there's incredible manipulation.
You see what the Trump administration did shutting off U.S.
They shut down a number of groups and a lot of that false media support where they were giving out billions here and billions there.
That is much more effective, in my opinion, than trying to strong arm local government or trying to strong arm from a federal policing level.
So, again, I would say if you already have momentum and winning from things like taking out USAID and all the money they were giving to support these very anti American causes, then you're already on the, you know, you're already.
Moving in the right direction.
So, you don't want to get tripped up.
And that's why I would like to hear people like Vance be more sensible and stop trying to be like a Trump mini me and be like, yeah, that jerk or whatever.
You know, that's not, I've pointed this out before, but that's kind of a falsification of his personality.
You know, he's, there's a lot of wonkish, you know, like he's really like a big thinker.
And that's what he needs to bring forward.
And the personality or tough guy thing with him doesn't fly.
I don't know.
I think that's part of the PR there.
So you're not concerned about an overreach?
Well, we'll have to see what they do.
I think that they are putting out feelers and saying, we don't want this to grow.
And, you know, we don't want groups trying to take over towns like they did with Portland a couple of years ago and stuff.
So, no, of course, you have to be concerned about the overreach of the federal government whenever they get in power.
And you have to be able to push them back.
You know, absolutely.
David Allen, I suspect AI is being used to fast war game these events and then pre prepare all the false trails of distraction like dark insider trading.
Well, there is an AI factor going on here and it is sorting out scenarios.
You know, it's interesting.
Musk announced he was like, the entire algorithm is going to be run by AI by the end of the year.
And I remember thinking to him, my first glance at that was like, wow, you know.
AI determining what really should be going on in a major platform like Twitter.
No way.
I'm not buying it.
I think there also should be ethical guardrails built in for saying, look, we have AI, you know, and you can only replace, say, 20% of your workforce max with it, because otherwise you're just going to have all these people thrown out of work.
And, you know, if you can move it in over time, you're going to have to wait because you can only take so much of your workforce and replace it with this.
And there's all kinds of ways for governments to get together and get real legislation around something like that.
The problem is, there will be places like China where they'll just install it anyway with no ethical guardrails because they haven't been known to have any.
So you're going to have to coerce other governments to work with that also.
But nobody's looking at that.
They're just looking at their profit factor and not thinking about it.
Because as we know, that top 1% is controlling.
50%, you know, they're holding 50% of the wealth, and the bottom 99% has the rest.
That's an imbalance.
When something gets top heavy, what happens?
Right.
So instead of going down that route, figure out the balancing act now.
Here's a problem with what they talk about with AI and how they're discovering this and discovering that.
Look, they've had artificial intelligence since the 1960s.
They're way, way ahead of it.
They're way, way ahead of us in relation to it.
And so, when you're looking at that, you have to keep in mind that they already know a number of the outcomes with AI.
They already know what it can do, but they're also 50 some odd years ahead of what it can do.
So, what they're rolling out to the public and doing the hand wringing over and stuff is stuff they're 50 years ahead on already.
So, that's part of the problem.
Assassination Of America Unveiled00:12:13
That's why this show gets at the advanced technology, the exotic technology question, the UFO file question.
And I wanted to point out that there was a Kennedy researcher.
I have her letter.
I found this in the archives.
And whenever the Kennedy and UFO file questions overlap, I pay attention because I know there was a big battle that got drawn out there.
But this is Sylvia Marr.
And she's talking all about Paris Flamand, who, as I mentioned, the assassination of America was an incredible synopsis of his decades of looking into the forces that were behind the assassinations of the Kennedys.
Martin Luther King and others, but particularly the Kennedy assassinations.
And the work that he was able to cull and put together, he put together in a fascinating 1,600 page, four volume set called The Assassination of America.
Now, it took me years, years to get it because it has, by and large, disappeared and been taken off.
Paris Lamont died in 2013.
And some people, of course, you know, have written to me and say, yeah, I have the volumes.
I finally did get the entire set.
And they are Paris's.
Yes.
But the other thing is, you know, that it took, how long did it take?
Like a year and a half, something like that.
And you cannot, I'm telling you, like, if you look for the assassination of America, you won't find it.
And I think there's a reason for that.
I think it's so explosive the way that he breaks it down.
That it's incredibly valuable.
And it's interesting.
I pulled a section out of his Assassination of America, Book One, The Deaths in Dallas.
And I'm going to read his little section on Hostie and the whole note business because it's included there as well.
Among the stranger filaments that weave through the texture of the pre assassination mystique, Oswald's alleged deliverance of a note.
The FBI office in Dallas, which came into the hands of Agent James Hostey, who was directed to destroy it by Special Agent in Charge Gordon Shanklin.
When Oswald's address book was seized after the assassination, it contained the address, private phone number, and auto license plate number of FBI Special Agent James Hostey.
That's a lot of personal info.
And Hostey's address was subsequently deleted from a list of the addresses in the book compiled by the Dallas police.
They knew what to leave out.
As I said, watch the evidence.
In the aftermath of the assassination, other pertinent information tying Oswald to the FBI began to appear.
The conservative National Review, hardly ill disposed to the FBI or J. Edgar Hoover, reported.
In Dallas, a top reporter for a large East Coast daily learned from an unimpeachable source that Oswald came back.
From Mexico City with $5,000 he had not had when he left.
It started, and so this is a whole thing at the FBI trying to build up this image of Oswald getting bribed when he went to Mexico City.
Of course, there's no evidence that he went to Mexico City.
And, you know, the CIA said, oh, as soon as he got to the embassy, our cameras failed.
Do you want to believe that?
They might give you a cameras field thing in the Robinson case, too, or like they have this front facing camera, but gee, you know, it just happened to fail just before he got up there.
So, and I'm not predisposing.
That kind of cynicism, but unfortunately, you can see it happening quite easily.
And all right, we'll take two more questions, Miss Olivia.
I have a quote to read, and then we're done.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
It's X Series 205.
The Assassination of America Revealed.
It is the Patsy Principle.
We've laid out even the esoteric origins behind some of the workings of the assassination groups.
I want to remind you, if you're new here, especially to go to darkjournalist.com.
And sign up for our newsletter.
That's a free newsletter and it keeps us in touch through the maze of censorship from getting this information out to you.
We're dealing with the deep facts, we're dealing with the UFO file, the deep information, you know, the deep state action.
And when they go into overdrive, then I want to deliver that information to you more than ever.
And so that's all there in the newsletter.
It has all the X series episodes that'll blow your mind.
Incredible interviews we're setting up right now.
Just wait till you see the dance card that's coming up.
And also, remarkable docuseries.
I've been finishing up and working on new episodes of The Craze in the Hot Zone, which is all about, of course, the secret Atlantis ruins in the Bahamas, and also the JFK UFO file and a follow up to the JFK final speech.
So, those are all coming out, and you want to make sure that you're on board for that.
Miss Olivia, you're up.
Okay.
Sammy says DJ is missing a huge part.
Why hasn't Trump declared war on the assassin conspiracy that tried to kill him?
Well, look, the president has some very important abilities, but he can't do everything.
And there's part of that apparatus.
I've called this before the Stansfield Turner problem.
So Jimmy Carter gets into the White House in 1977, and he asks George Bush for the UFO file.
And George Bush says, That's on a need to know basis.
And you definitely don't need to know, peanut farmer.
And Carter fires him.
Now, firing a CIA director is a big deal.
And in those days, you kept the guy from the previous administration.
Maybe you'd, you know, after a couple of years, you'd let him go, but you wouldn't fire him on the spot like that.
So Carter did a big action right away and he installed his friend, Stansfield Turner.
And Stansfield Turner, although he was the head of the CIA, Those guys just didn't talk to him.
They were kind of thinking, we'll just wait this guy out.
So they went offshore and formed something called the Safari Club, which was still involved in kind of like rearranging the world, the Iranian revolution, and manipulation of oil prices, all these different things they were still doing.
They just weren't doing it under the direct umbrella of the CIA.
And there's a bunch of agents from that period that are.
You know, really, I mean, it's very interesting to trace their footsteps because they're so involved in the heart of all these things.
And they set up things like the Nugent Bank in Australia.
There's a huge money laundering thing that goes on.
But Stansfield Turner can't do anything about it because he's an outsider.
Even though he has the title, he doesn't have the connections in order to handle that CIA.
So Carter finds out pretty quickly that he's got the same CIA problem that Kennedy did or that Nixon did.
And Nixon actually said, look, the tapes came out recently that Nixon said, To Helms, and he recorded them.
We have the tape to this now, it's not supposition.
He says to him, Look, you know, they're going to get into talking about who killed JFK, all right?
And I want to know all the things that you have on your side about what the CIA did so that I can protect you.
I've always protected your dirty tricks things because I think it's important for the country and all this stuff.
But I need to know, like, what was going on here, who was involved as far as the who shot John part of it.
So, Nixon was facing off against Helms.
And so, I think the CIA was like, forget about this.
We've had enough of this guy.
You know, here comes Watergate to pull this, you know, situation out.
And as soon as they get him out, they get Bush in as CIA director.
So, you know, you get some idea of what's going on there.
These people have faced off against their intelligence services.
So, now with Trump having Ratcliffe at CIA and with him having Patel at FBI, He has a shot at getting more straight answers, Gabbard at DNI, but you still have a gigantic infrastructure there that might be willing, able to, you know, wait him out.
And, you know, the masters that they serve are the deep state, not the whole monolith of the intelligence agencies.
Of course, there are people just doing their intelligence jobs, running down espionage and things of that nature.
But that core element of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Their nefarious activities, the black projects, and all the rest of it.
That's never gone away.
It's a myth that they were bad and now they're all reformed and great.
Nobody ever gave them a reason to reform.
So, you know, they have their own air force.
They're still planning assassinations.
As I often point out, they planned the assassination of Assange just a few years ago.
Last time I checked, that's a private citizen.
It was a publisher, you know.
It's legal, it's an international crime.
They were planning it.
It was actually Trump that stopped them from doing it.
Mike Pompeo was all set to lay it down.
So, you know, you have a problem.
The intelligence agencies are dramatically out of control and you need a totally new paradigm.
Right now, I think the Trump people are outsiders.
So when you say Trump needs to get to the bottom of all this, well, he installed a lot of people this time that he didn't do the first time.
But I still think it's hard, you know, for the president.
Doesn't have the kind of control over the intelligence agencies that he should.
The executive branch, they should serve at the pleasure of the president.
But in my opinion, they don't.
Yes.
Luminescent Lux, I think we have two deep states.
One is challenging the other in the shadows and vice versa.
And Christian Irwin, do you believe there's a possibility that the deep state involves entities beyond our understanding?
Well, that's what I got at tonight with Steiner's work.
He was giving us a hint that these assassinations aren't just.
Human political problems that there's a deep clash in those secret societies in the background, and those secret societies, you know, they deal with things like the astral plane, and uh, you know, they have all kinds of moves available to them on that side.
I understand, you know, we have to deal from as many political facts as we can, but I think we get insights from people, um, with a great demonstrated history, like Steiner.
Steiner, who gave us spiritual science, anthroposophy, who came out of theosophy and gave us Eurythmy, the Waldorf schools.
I mean, you cannot deny the incredible contributions of this person.
So, if he's telling us that there's an harmonic core that is operating through this assassination and fear events and arresting our attention, it very much reminds me of the investigations of Gurdjieff and Ospensky on.
Free Energy And Political Facts00:15:17
The mind control that was going on during the Russian Revolution.
And this wonderful book by P.D. Ospensky about the Russian Revolution and its letters from Ospensky back to a friend of his in Britain from Moscow, letters from Moscow, and how the entire government that was there one day is just collapsing and the Bolsheviks are taking over.
And, you know, what he says is there are all these weird rumors everywhere, and the rumors are, you know, Food is going to be $300 for an egg and all these things that caused the chaos that caused them to go into this overdrive.
Well, now they have the ability.
I mean, they use television very well for this, for propaganda, but now they have these phones and the smartphones and the technology that are rifling right through people's minds.
I was walking around today in Harvard Square.
You know, we're right over, it's a great, lovely view of the Harvard campus and everything else.
And, uh, Three quarters of the people, the younger people who were walking around, they were just deep in their phone, walking, looking deep in the phone.
Now, I can appreciate it because, you know, you have things that you need to do and all the rest of it.
But if you don't have situational awareness in public and if you're sucked out of your being to that extent, you can be manipulated pretty easily.
And so, you know, I'm very pro technology.
As you know, I came out of technology in some ways because I.
I was an editor for a very popular tech magazine for a decade.
So I got to meet all those people and I got very involved on the tech side.
But it's very interesting that technology needs to go hand in hand with some aspect of our wisdom.
And I will give us this quote tonight.
I thought I wasn't going to get to it, but I have the perfect layout now.
And it is all about John Keeley.
Now, we talk a lot about free energy and.
You know, what would happen if we had all these great energy pieces?
It's quite fascinating because Steiner says so much, as does Blavatsky, about John Keeley and the great motor that he invented.
And it used a psychic ether energy.
And it was this advanced technology that he was able to bring through.
I was looking for my Steiner picture here.
Oh, there it is.
Great portrait of Steiner, is there?
I'm not going to be able to do that.
I'm not going to be able to do that.
Here's what he has to say.
And there's a very key comment in here.
Watch.
So, Keeley, by the way, demonstrated a flying machine in the 1880s to the US Army that could fly 500 miles per hour.
Very hard to believe.
And yet, there are so many sources around what he was doing.
And, you know, that's before you get like the Wright brothers with a bicycle and some wings becoming the first flight.
That's a good 20 years earlier.
Keeley.
Here's what Steiner says John Keeley harbored the ideal of building a motor that would not run on steam or electricity, but on waves we create when we make sounds when we speak.
Just imagine that.
A motor that runs on the waves we set in motion when we speak, or indeed with our inner life in general.
Of course, this was his ideal.
We can thank God it was just an ideal at that time.
For what would this world war be like if Keeley's ideal had been realized?
If it is ever realized, then we will see that the harmony and what the harmony of vibrations in external motor power really means.
And relating to Masonic imagery, this then is the other one sidedness of the Boaz pillar.
It is between these two pillars we must pass through.
So, what he's saying there is if we had got this free energy technology, this harmonious psychic technology in that period, it would have been utilized.
In World War II, it would have caused that much more damage.
So you see, humanity wasn't ready for it.
And this is something that is very compelling when we look at it because so many technologies have been suppressed and things.
But then there's something about the leadership that we have, and it really needs to be looked at deeply.
That those people, you know, like can you imagine Mark Zuckerberg with Keeley's psychic motor?
I mean, you don't want Jeff Bezos or Musk in charge of that, do you?
So, there's something here about our situation on planet Earth that I think we're trying to look at here.
And it'll give us a much better frame of mind.
Here's my final quote from Steiner on Franz Ferdinand.
And I hope that we were able to congeal some vision of the past and how these assassinations have worked in our history so we understand them better in the 21st century.
And I quote Steiner We must remember also that the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was only the last.
Great blow in a whole series of assassination attempts against the Austrian government officials to have taken place within the space of a few months.
This was, in fact, a particular campaign which was even quite comprehensible and in keeping with certain people.
You remember I told you about the occult background of this individuality, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
You also remember that it's a fact, paradoxical fact, that, um, This couple, and he goes into the history of this very strange suicide pact between the former Duke and his mistress.
And it's quite fascinating because that's what actually got Franz Ferdinand into power.
But the thing, I guess the thrust of this quote that I wanted to get across was that that series of assassination attempts is a season of assassination.
I've pointed that out before, which is why the period.
That we're in is so dangerous, and why there needs to be a concerted effort on the part of the leadership to lower the temperature because those groups can utilize that heightened sense of chaos and civil war and all that stuff to maximize the deep state purpose of creating chaos through assassination.
And you'll get more if they do that.
So it's very important to keep that in mind that this season of assassination is the danger here.
And I've pointed out different seasons of assassination.
Of course, President Kennedy was caught in one of those, and it was de Gaulle who they had tried to take out in France.
And the CIA was behind all of these different assassinations around the world.
They had removed the UN director because he was very spiritually minded.
Killed him in a plane crash, and they had removed the entire British royalty through a call girl scandal and all that.
Just the people who were in their way, they were clearing away.
And that season of removal, you know, the DM brothers, as I mentioned, who they try to pin on Kennedy, you know, Kennedy, in fact, gave the opposite instructions to keep them in power and protect them.
And the, you know, I've pointed out that the Central Intelligence Agency.
Put them in a position where they would be assassinated.
So the CIA works on that principle of assassination equals the kind of change that they're looking for.
The CIA and the deep state, the role that they play in the deep state.
Remember, it's not just the CIA, that deep state encompasses incredible forces of intelligence gathering.
And, you know, you got the NSA involved there and you have these contracting groups, et cetera.
So, and there's the incredible wealth building.
Situations, the oil companies, the tech companies, they're all, all involved there.
And with that, Miss Olivia, your last question of the evening.
I guess this isn't a question, but I guess this is true.
Nevermore says Albania has just elected AI as prime minister.
Oh, and I hope not.
No, it has happened.
Technocracy leading to all time Skynet underway.
This is it.
Well, I always said Game of Thrones.
This is the end of Game of Thrones.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
The understanding of it is that Bran Stark is basically AI, that's what he represents.
And I knew it was going to be since then.
People missed the symbolism and I got it right away.
Wow.
So, anyway, it's an experiment.
We'll see how it goes.
Anything you want to say about that?
I think you said it all there.
I want to point a comparison picture there.
When you see this, and when they flash this on your screens over the next coming weeks, and of course, the Tyler Robinson plea is going to be coming in, he'll be back in court on September 29th.
But when you see this, I want you to remember this, which is the Manchurian candidate and how all the things in that movie reveal the process of mind control, which is why that movie was taken out of circulation for 20 years.
Keep in mind that there's a lot, a lot of manipulation going on.
And the way that you can get through it is by asking for the right answers and keeping in mind there's a program.
That's been afoot for a number of years around this.
And it is an MKUltra assassination program.
And the people who do it are not low level, disgruntled people who are unhappy with their lives.
It is those people that are chosen and manipulated into position to take the fall for what the other people do.
So if I can get that across tonight, then I'm a very happy, happy journalist, in this case, a dark journalist.
And Miss Olivia, your super chats.
Coming up.
Okay.
Gur Ryan, Jake, Empire of Light, Amarillo Gunrunners, Old Man Junkins, Desk Hat Brock, Polkinelli, Steve Z, Paul Adams, Eurythmia is Fun, Jessica Rodriguez, Jimmy Lyle Kenemer, Robert Scott, The Bikini Truther,
Christian Irwin, Justin Case 008, Curtis Nelson, Helena Wilcox, Deborah McAdoo, Neurosurgery Highland, 57, Erica Swenson Elliott, and Rich Hall.
Thank you so much.
For your generous super chats.
Fantastic.
We really appreciate, of course, all your support.
And to all our subscribers, thank you.
And it's very important.
I know that the topics are deep, deep tonight.
I think we got through it in style and the ideas from with the great questions.
Bravo, Miss Olivia.
Nicely done.
You know, I'm going to do some shout outs here before we let you go.
Let's see here.
Johan Wolf, Darla Cash, much gratitude to all.
We shall prevail.
I like that.
We shall prevail.
Remember in the civil rights movement, they said, We will overcome.
Things looked pretty tough for them at the time, too.
So, yeah, if they can do it, we can do it.
Let's see.
Heather Sansone, the eyes say it all, the windows of the soul.
Indeed, indeed.
I've always believed that.
And you can always tell from the eyes.
Here to look for the symbolism will be their downfall.
Have to look for the symbolism that will be their downfall.
That is why the show was.
Kind of founded on the steganography idea.
Our show here, the X series, is actually the X steganography series.
Jason Finlow, DJ's a legend.
Thank you, Jason.
Wow, that is really fantastic.
You guys are legends.
That's what I say.
And we got our inspiration from the ideas room and keep it coming.
Keep it coming.
Let's see.
Great show, Bufo Loompa.
Wow.
Thank you, sir.
Darcy Edmonds.
Remember Uncle Ted.
Yes, yes.
Are you talking about Robinson's uncle?
We did mention that he was a special forces guy.
I think that is very significant indeed.
I also think that the differing stories of what the father did is interesting.
They're like, oh, he worked in a prison.
No, he didn't.
Oh, he worked in the sheriff's office.
No, he didn't.
Oh, he works for a construction company in the past 20 years.
Can we have some real answers about this guy?
I mean, it shouldn't be that hard to get.
So, some diciness, some real diciness.
Yes, that was Lawrence Harvey in The Manchurian Candidate.
An incredible.
If you've never seen The Manchurian Candidate, the 1961 version or 62, I think it is, watch it because that opening sequence is like nothing you've ever seen.
And get ready because it's heavy.
It's a heavy movie.
Let's see here.
Good movie.
That's right.
See, we like the same stuff.
Was it prime minister or minister of AI?
That's a good question.
I'll look into that as soon as we're done here tonight.
Let's see.
Ah, yes.
David Dash, Evan Ward, L. Sid, Jessica Rodriguez.
Thank you, Jessica.
Friday nights are the favorite day of the week.
I look forward to the show.
Yes, yes, yes.
And let's see what else we got here.
Gracious lady, fantastic evening.
Thank you.
Thank you, gracious lady.
I know Kate's out there.
It's great to see you.
Robert Wolf.
I always learn a lot.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Najat.
Hey, I saw Najat out there.
Oops.
There we go.
It's amazing after so many years of JFK Info, I'm still learning something new.
Oh, yeah.
I think it would take a lot to really learn what was going on there.
And, you know, I think Kennedy was that embodiment that Steiner was talking about, about the Archduke.
He was the embodiment of our hopes and aspirations.
And he would have acted as a complete reversal of what was going on.
With the people who wanted nuclear exchange and drug running and all that kind of stuff, and to dominate space.
So he embodied so much of us.
And I think the echo of what he's done is still there.
The Magic Mirror Of Camelot00:02:42
You can feel it if you really tune in.
Dark journalist, magic mirror, I see.
I think you're probably right.
There's some magic mirror somewhere.
AI automated agency, Matt Shaw, Robert Wolf.
Oh, I just want to throw this out.
Jacqueline Diamond.
Matt Stu says, Egregores suck.
And I want to say, I've been thinking this week how we don't talk about egregores enough.
And it's really easy to let that whole concept slip.
Thought form, the embodiment of the thought form.
Yeah, absolutely.
You have to create.
Remember, Casey said, thoughts are things, they can be crimes or miracles.
So, what is it you're creating with your thoughts?
And certainly, you know, it's not to surround our thinking with, you know, This group, eliminating that group, and all the rest of it is to create an awareness.
And we go in the right way, then we're home free.
Thank you for your discernment.
Wow, Helena, thank you for being with us.
And to all of you tonight, fantastic show.
Great to be with you.
Believe it or not, I had even more to share.
So we're going to share it with you next week.
And we will be back on Friday.
And we have some interesting surprises and some interesting interviews coming up as well, including some great things.
And of course, Gigi Young.
Is going to be asking her to come back on in the aftermath of all this as well.
Because we need a voice like Gigi's.
And if you haven't checked out Gigi's latest, then you definitely want to be there at Gigi Young.
So look for her on YouTube and ggyoung.com, just doing fantastic out of this world stuff.
Our latest episode with her is called CERN Menace.
And boy, is that really pertinent to what we were talking about tonight.
So keep that in mind.
Give somebody a shout out, yeah, sure.
Okay, so Mick Moonbeam, who's an astrologer on YouTube, uh, oh, yeah, yeah, I follow did a fantastic episode on Charlie Kirk's astrology for anybody who's in.
Oh, boy, um, she struck just the right tone, and it's fascinating.
Also, wow, fantastic.
Well, everyone, we will see you all again until then.
Sleep tight, and you know, it says end broadcast, but after all, never really ends, never really ends, and never let it be forgot.
Once there was.
Camelot, and there can be again, it's you and I that can put it together.
Keep that in mind, too.
And you guys, in the ideas room, you've got the power, let me tell you.