Daniel Liszt argues the CIA withheld JFK assassination records to protect a UFO file intended for the Soviets, linking Lee Harvey Oswald to psychological warfare handler George Joannides and alleging Judge John Tunheim's refusal to release documents stems from their unbelievable contents. The host connects these secrets to a shadow "cryptocracy," claims of silenced witnesses like Karen Kupsonet, and demands a new House Assassination Committee to expose deep state manipulation before 2039 seals remain, suggesting the assassination was driven by aerospace technology rather than mafia conspiracies. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
New JFK Records and Special Letter00:15:08
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalists.
What a fantastic crowd we have out there tonight in the Ideas Room.
Of course, tonight I am joined by the lovely Olivia.
Hi, everybody.
And Olivia, we have a lot of fascinating things to get to tonight on this JFK Records piece, including some brand new information and a special letter that I sent to the incoming speaker of the house, Kevin McCarthy, which I'm going to read to you live here on the air.
It's great to have so many of you here with us.
I guess we had Zelensky here in DC visiting us and collecting his $45 billion.
That's nice.
And Biden said, This is so important, this historic visit.
And then the leader of the Republican Senate, McConnell, he came out and said, The top priority for the United States is defending Ukraine.
And I couldn't disagree more.
It's a military boondoggle for those defense contractors.
And that's why you see that gigantic omnibus bill.
And it's over the top.
I mean, that's $1.6 trillion.
And the National Defense Authorization Act is $800 billion of that.
So that's going straight to defense contractors.
And, you know, it's funny, whenever they come to soldiers and healthcare and all that, there's always a big struggle over that.
Oh, we don't know if we can get it.
It's like they had to be forced over the top.
But when it comes to, Getting money for missiles and anti missiles and provoking all these wars over there.
It's a cinch because that's a big money boondoggle on all sides, which is the danger there.
So the more we expose that, the better off as a country we'll be.
And we'll hold the salutations for Mr. Zelensky.
It's a fantastic holiday season that's coming up here.
And I want everyone to have a fantastic holiday weekend coming up.
And just to let you know, we're going to be having the X series come back for you the first.
Friday in January, and what you're going to get between now and the end of the year are these special reports.
And there's some exciting things coming up for you in January, which, you know, interviews and documentaries and just absolutely knockdown episodes of the X series coming for you.
So make sure that you're on that newsletter list, especially if you're new.
And you can sign up there by going to darkjournalist.com to make sure that we all get around this ridiculous censorship, shadow banning, whatever you want to call it.
And what's wonderful is people send me examples of this all the time.
And I just find it absolutely fascinating the way that they keep all those dark journalist results under wraps because, you know, God forbid the ideas room gets out and becomes the craze there, the craze in the hot zone.
Tonight, we're going to be going over some of the kind of fascinating developments over the last two days on the JFK files piece, including.
Some very unusual actions and responses that are going on behind the scenes that I want to really point out here.
As we know, on December 15th, the JFK records came out.
However, they didn't let out the good records, the important records from the Central Intelligence Agency.
No surprises there.
However, there was a false start, and there was the impression that these records were coming out.
And there was a press conference by the Mary Farrell Foundation in Washington.
So, before all this even took place, so we had something going on there, and then the mainstream media picked up with that, pretended it was the release and that they had all this information the CIA got out, and they cited the Mary Farrell Foundation, who in fact is suing the Biden administration for the CIA records.
But they don't even get a response to that case coming up until January.
So, all the things in Newsweek and BBC saying, hey, we have these new files because of this lawsuit.
We're all completely false and completely wrong.
This is very strange activity, and I'm going to point out why as we get into this tonight.
Of course, if you're familiar with the X series, the X Deganography series that we do here on Fridays, you'll know that all the research that I've done for a number of years points directly to the assassination being linked to an aerospace assassination group called X Protect residing inside that corridor between the defense contractors and the intelligence agencies.
That group is very important because they're very hard, even through CIA lenses, to find, and they don't come up on the deep state radar very often when you have those really good researchers going in and finding those connections.
This thing gets missed because of the nature of the unusual task that they have, which is to keep aerospace secrets, and that includes exotic technology in the UFO file.
And the UFO file is central.
Right to the heart, the core of the JFK assassination case.
And in my letter to McCarthy, I made that part clear as well.
So, what I'm going to do is start the show off with the letter that I wrote to incoming Speaker of the House, McCarthy, for him to get something going in regard to the release of the actual CIA records, not this sideshow thing, but the George Joannitti's records.
We're going to cover Joannitti some more tonight.
And he's the CIA officer who was in charge of the psychological warfare operation that was Oswald.
And then he's the guy who chaired and was the liaison between the House Assassination Committee.
So the reason basically the CIA was covered and we never got to this aerospace aspect is because Joe Annides was standing there as the gatekeeper, but nobody knew.
They didn't know who he was.
And now what's interesting is many of the records, even that are coming out, Joe Annides isn't cited because they didn't even know when they ordered.
Lawfully for those records to come out, that Joe Annides was a part of it.
So the CIA kept him that much of a mystery man.
And there's a reason for that, which we're going to show you tonight.
The story as it goes is basically the three sets of records that the CIA is the most afraid of having public are the Joe Annides records, the Garrison records, and the E. Howard Hunt records, which they were very careful to exclude from this release of documents they put out on the 15th, which was basically a sideshow.
Nothing burger from the Those guys that we've come to expect that from.
So here's my letter now, which was sent out today by certified mail to the Honorable Kevin McCarthy, Republican leader.
Here's the text of the letter.
And I've put it in a link in the description on this video.
And that's a link.
I posted it on Facebook.
I'll put up a PDF for people who aren't on Facebook.
And I also posted this on Twitter.
Okay.
The Honorable Kevin McCarthy, Republican leader.
H204, the Capitol, Washington, D.C., 20515.
Here we go.
Regarding the appointment of a House JFK assassination committee in 2023 with a goal to release all files withheld by the CIA on its role in the murder of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963.
Dear Leader McCarthy, with the recent release of the JFK assassination records on December 15, 2022, it's clearly obvious that the Central Intelligence Agency is withholding crucial information regarding their key agents and personnel and their activities.
In 1963.
This includes the records of CIA Career Intelligence Medal recipient George Joannidis, who organized the Lee Harvey Oswald psychological operation and was the CIA liaison to the House Assassinations Committee in 1979.
With the Fox News segment on December 15, 2022, on the Tucker Carlson show regarding a confirmed inside whistleblower who had observed what was in the withheld CIA records, we learned the following from Carlson.
And this is straight from Carlson's broadcast.
We spoke to someone who had access to these still hidden CIA documents, a person who was deeply familiar with what they contained.
We asked this person directly, did the CIA have a hand in the murder of John F. Kennedy, an American president?
And here's the reply we received verbatim The answer is yes.
I believe they were involved.
It's a whole different country from what we thought.
It's all fake, unquote.
And that comes directly from the Fox News Tucker Carlson show.
The statement, according to my sources and best research, was likely given to the Fox News team by the judge for the United States District Court for Minnesota, Judge John R. Tunheim, who served as chairman of the Assassination Records Review Board, which oversaw the collection of records relating to the assassination of John F. Kennedy from 1994 to 1995.
Judge Tunheim has previously said on the record that the CIA misled the Assassination Record Review Board and he That he was heading up regarding the role of their agent George Joannides in the assassination.
This statement, in combination with the public comments by Fox News contributor Judge Andrew Napolitano, makes a case for a new House committee to force the records out of the CIA.
Napolitano recalled a conversation he had with former President Trump in 2020, in which the president stated he couldn't release the records, even though it was required by a law enacted by Congress in 1992.
That the CIA records must be made available by October 26, 2017.
Trump stated that not even the president could release the CIA records because of what they revealed.
Former Watergate lawyer Douglas Caddy has put on the record during my interview with him that CIA veteran E. Howard Hunt, his close friend, admitted the CIA's complicity in the JFK assassination, with the reason being President Kennedy's desire to share the UFO file with the Soviets.
An action which they considered a national security threat.
CIA agent George Joannidis was given the Career Intelligence Medal by Admiral Bobby Inman, the deputy CIA director.
Inman is still living and could be compelled to testify under oath as to what activities Joannidis engaged in for the CIA in relation to the JFK assassination.
Clearly, by law and in the public interest and in consideration of the government's promise of transparency, the records must be released.
As part of the launching of a House assassination committee for the new Congress to investigate in January of 2023, the committee should be focused on the assassination of President Kennedy and the role of the CIA in obfuscating the truth, and it should obtain a full, detailed record of their involvement in the death of President Kennedy in 1963.
Nothing could be more important to reassure the American public and the world that the United States is a country that respects the rule of law.
The CIA must be made to give a complete accounting of their actions in the assassination of our 35th president, John F. Kennedy.
Sincerely yours, Daniel List, host of the Dark Journalist Show.
So, McCarthy got this letter, he's going to get this letter tomorrow.
This is important for a number of reasons.
One, McCarthy himself has stated openly that.
With the release of the Twitter files and the things they're looking at with the FBI interfering in social media, that he's interested in a church committee style investigation.
Now, the church committee is an interesting thing to raise up, and his awareness of it is good and means there's a possibility he may actually respond to this letter, which is, you know, he both has a hand delivered copy and it's available online through the various social media outlets we put out there and as many different.
Places we can get it.
Now, the church committee, what were they doing?
They were looking into CIA atrocities and the manipulation by the NSA and interference in communications and surveillance and these things.
And they found incredible things, including the fact that there were over 400 paid assets of the CIA on record as a result of their investigation.
They found this out and they were throughout the media organizations.
Now, that's something that, you know, at the time, Rolling Stone and, you know, newspapers like that were really outraged about this.
And there was a whole flap about it.
And then we got this kind of post Watergate vibe of investigating the government, which was actually quite healthy.
But that all got stirred up and it turned into the House Assassination Committee eventually.
And in the House Assassination Committee, after three years and tons of obfuscation and deaths of witnesses and all the rest, It was determined that there was a conspiracy.
So that's what the government's final word on the JFK assassination was, which is there was a probable conspiracy.
So the Warren Commission back in 64, they said, oh, it's Lee Oswald.
Don't look any further than that.
He had a troubled childhood.
And he happened to get this job and got this incredible view of the president going by.
And he just decided to bring a rifle up there and get these incredible shots that no one else could do, not even the FBI.
So that was their thing.
Everyone knows that that's false now, and that's fallen apart over the years.
In fact, what's interesting is the media has clung on to that, and they've sort of tried to forget all about the House Assassinations Committee.
But the power of the House Assassinations Committee is they could compel people under oath to give them testimony in relation to it.
Switching Attention on the Deep State00:04:17
That's what can happen here with McCarthy, and why I think it's so important that he take this up because we're never going to get the CIA records.
They're going to do the dance, and you're going to have people like Jeff Morley go out on these.
Programs and Chuck Todd from Meet the Press is going to go.
Well, what could they be hiding?
Like some interference in some Central American company?
Big deal.
No, Chuck, they killed President Kennedy.
That's a lot to hide.
That's why you'd continue to keep the records.
And, you know, you're going to have those disappointed faces of the researchers like, we're going to keep trying to get them in court.
It's not going to work.
What you need is congressional action while there's attention on this, while everyone knows that what just came out were phony records and why, you know, Fox got involved and all the rest of it.
There's a wave of attention that can be turned into initiation.
Of this process, and they can have those records and they can get them quickly.
They can demand them through Congress.
And if the CIA balks at that, then they're just going to make themselves look more and more into the abyss of the lawless fringe that they're already in.
Now, you know, the actions of the Central Intelligence Agency in 1963 are one thing, but this agency has grown and grown and grown and grown.
And when you look at the problems that we have in Ukraine, look, this is the same exact nature of the problem.
You know, CIA went over there, they interfered in the elections, and we were putting NATO on their doorstep.
They responded in kind.
You know, the Russians invaded, and no one can condone what the Russians did in response to that.
But the whole point is to have a peace process, not to feed these defense contractors with this.
And it all goes back, oddly enough, to this incident nearly 60 years ago, where the, you know, what Professor Scott calls the first deep state revolt against the White House.
And, you know, we have people.
Who pick up the thread of what Professor Scott was doing.
But let's remember that Professor Scott showed that nexus between the CIA and the mafia.
And this is the legacy of his incredible work on this.
And everyone talking about right wing conspiracies and all that kind of thing.
Look, Professor Scott's as left wing as you get.
And I know him well, he's been on this program many times.
And he would describe himself as a left coast.
Teacher there at Berkeley.
But, you know, it's remarkable because he understands how the deep state works.
They don't play any favorites right or left, they're just doing what they do.
And, you know, one of the points that I make in relation to this whole process of study around the deep state is if you look at the 70s and the 80s, you have tons and tons of liberal people going after the Bilderberg group, going after these things.
That switches around, and the whole motivation behind the media groups switches.
And it's because the liberal aspect gets co opted when the neocons realize, oh, you know, the best way to keep sort of people, you know, doing anti war marches and all that kind of stuff is to co opt those guys and to get them, you know, just like you see now, the MSNBC liberals are all about, you know, hey, let's get that war in Ukraine, you know, jack it up.
And, you know, liberals used to be anti war.
So they've changed the entire thing.
They've also made them very fascist, you know, with the whole woke, extremely left.
Aspect that we've been seeing, which everyone in culture is laughing at.
And yet there's a tremendous force, tremendous money around a very small group doing these things, you know, and changing the definition of gender in the dictionary and all this nonsense.
So we're right in the middle of all that.
So when we start to see just how important it is to understand, one of the quotes from Professor Scott is I don't think we can solve the case, but we can learn about America by studying it.
You know, that's very interesting.
I certainly hope that we can solve the case, but I absolutely agree with him that this comprehension of this deep state machine, which is the American deep state, but also the global deep state that we're in the middle of right now, having just come through the COVID op, how much money did that make for these people?
UFO Files and CIA Manipulation00:15:58
And, you know, they can roll out wars just as fast as you can nail them.
Look at Zelensky's coming up here with his pocketbook for $45 billion this afternoon.
You know, I mean, where does it stop?
How do you stop it?
Well, the first thing to understand about the Central Intelligence Agency is it's extra constitutional, it's not foreseen in the Constitution.
It's basically a large illegal entity.
And even the people who set it up thought that, and they were talked into it.
As saying, well, this is going to be some kind of post war way to keep all the intelligence flow going.
But even Truman, if you look back at his earliest letters around it, he said, this sounds like an American Gestapo to me, and that's not who we are.
And we can see that they were right, and they never should have let that genie out of the bottle, but they did.
By the time you get to the Kennedy era, it's a showdown.
And this is why I say there's so much for us to learn in the Kennedy presidency and reflecting on those years.
And they talk about Camelot.
And all the rest of it, it is Arthurian, the battle there.
You know, they are going against the Knights of Mordred.
And we find ourselves in that struggle, you know, that he was putting out so much brave rhetoric in relation to this.
He was going around the State Department, going around the CIA, he was communicating with world leaders, getting out of this maze.
And by the time he gets to American University, In June of 1963, and says, You know, we all breathe the same air.
Like, what's going on?
Let's try to get peace going.
That's it, you know.
His request for the UFO files in November of 1963 on record is important to this process.
And we know that there's enough far out stuff in relation to the Kennedy assassination, but you can't leave that out.
So when people are going into this and they're thinking, You know, well, you know, you can't include this part because it's too far out or whatever.
Look, at this point, Congress has their own UAP hearings, right?
They already have a UFO office that they're spending money on, and the CIA is engaging in whipping up a UFO threat.
So, you know, there's nothing to be lost there by bringing up the fact that the CIA assassination of President Kennedy, the factor that was involved was the UFO file.
It's clear we've brought it forward on this program, but It needs to be emphasized that there's a huge aerospace aspect to this assassination.
And that's what we're going to look at here as we study the things that are happening just in the past two days around this case are absolutely phenomenal.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Special Report.
We're here on this Wednesday night before the Christmas weekend coming up.
And all of you are in our thoughts to have a great Christmas.
I want to remind everyone to go to darkjournalist.com if you haven't already and sign up.
For our newsletter.
It's a free newsletter, especially if you're new, make sure you're on there because we have incredible censorship going on in relation to the shows that we put out, but we're getting them out there anyway.
We're lucky to be joined tonight by Miss Olivia, and she's been answering your questions.
Now she's putting together some questions we're going to take in the second part.
We'll go maybe about an hour more tonight.
How are you doing over there?
Good.
Tina Borch says Should we all look for Kevin McCarthy's email account and bombard him with requests to set up a committee to reinvestigate it?
Yes.
And Brad Briggs says a grand jury can compel testimony.
Yes.
Well, they can put people under oath for, you know, during an assassination committee, just like they did with the bogus J6 thing.
You know, maybe we could kind of turn the karma of that nonsense around and have a real committee for a change.
But McCarthy, I think, you know, if we go at him in a very respectful manner and ask him to do this, he's got the wind at his back.
And in fact, it's the Biden administration at this point which is helping the CIA block the records.
I'm not saying that.
Other Republican administrations haven't, but this could be an opening for him.
And if they are looking in that world to regain the trust of the public, this could help dramatically.
And it's not going to be held, you know, it's not going to happen through these little efforts of these researchers kind of crawling to MSNBC and give me my two minutes of soundbite.
And, you know, where they go, well, just keep on with the good fight.
You know, those media.
Groups, what they're doing, it seems to me, in fact, that one of the things that's always been in the background there was to come out and say, oh, you know, it turns out that there was a big lie going on in the CIA.
And what it was, it was about the mafia.
The mafia killed John Kennedy and they had to hide that, you know.
Well, there's a big problem with that.
And you have researchers out there.
There's a guy out there who's doing books about JFK and stuff, Mark Shaw, who's a lawyer.
And I'm sure he's a good writer and everything.
He's a good presenter.
But the thesis that, you know, this is all Carlos Marcello and all that's nonsense.
You know, this is a deep state operation to remove an executive.
The mafia can't do that kind of stuff.
They can't change autopsies.
You know, they can't make brains go missing.
You know, so the only thing that you can do with the mafia in that scenario is you could say that the deep state aspect of the CIA.
Was hiring mafia hire at that time.
And they might have used mafia people as gunmen, but the mafia can't create this whole scenario.
And then they can't make the media not report it.
And they can't do the cover up through the Warren Commission and all that.
It doesn't work.
So when you hear that, understand that there's two things.
One, there's a huge CIA narrative investment in that story, too, that they want this other story.
And it's interesting when you go back into that history that Professor Scott goes into.
Here's how it works, and I'll try to do it the condensed version.
I actually have some quotes from Scott tonight that I think are worth reading.
But basically, the first story that they were able to promote by using Oswald as the patsy in the story was the Russians and the Cubans were involved.
And then they were able to use that story for story two so that people like LBJ could go to somebody like Earl Warren, who didn't want to get involved in the Warren Commission, and say, You have to do this, or millions of Americans will die because.
We know Oswald was going to meet with the KGB and all this nonsense, which he never was.
As a matter of fact, he was a CIA asset spying on the Russians when he went over there.
So, but they used this other story.
And then that story, they said, okay, we're going to use that behind the scenes to blackmail everybody into the cover up.
And then the next thing that they do is they say, okay, everyone has to say that Oswald was a lone gunman in order to avoid World War III.
And this is the kind of manipulation that they did.
And it's a criminal overthrow of a government.
But the next thing that they do after that, when they, a few years later, stories are getting out and things aren't adding up, the Garrison investigation is going on.
So, they start to leak these stories that Bobby Kennedy was involved because he was setting up assassination plots against Castro, which the CIA was doing on their own, and the Kennedys were trying to rein them in and stop them from this assassination program.
They assassinated the leader, the brothers, the DM brothers, in Vietnam three weeks before they assassinated President Kennedy.
So, they were on an assassination binge, and the Kennedys were trying to rein this process in, get the CIA back under control.
Of the executive branch.
That's the nature of the battle there.
But the talking points and the propaganda that they put forward are, oh, Bobby, you know, Bobby was the key man, and that all came back.
They were like, you know, if Bobby's after us, well, you know, the mafia killed him in revenge, or Castro killed him in revenge.
So this is all CIA psychological warfare operation run by Joe Annides.
Now, what's interesting is you see people peddle that now.
Like I said, there are these books going out now, and they were like, oh, Marcello did it, and, you know, Um, those Kennedys, they were you know, they were involved with mafia and assassinations.
This is all CIA stuff, and the CIA what they like to do.
One of the things that happened recently is that Mark Wahlberg picked up one of these books, and the idea was Bobby killed Marilyn.
Right?
Look, these are what the Central Intelligence Agency does they do the assassinations, they bump off people without batting an eyelash, right?
So What better kind of twisted thing for them to get going and support, but these ideas that, hey, you know, we're not killers, the Kennedys are who we killed, you know?
So it's a sick thing that we're in the middle of that you're watching play out there in the media.
And I'm going to read some coverage that's been going on in relation to this.
Let's get a little bit familiar with a key aspect that I brought up in my letter.
Why did I bring up Bobby Inman?
Bobby Inman was.
The deputy CIA director, and he was the head of the NSA and a long history in the Navy.
He's very close to the UFO file.
Now, to his credit, in the 80s and early 90s, he came out very openly saying he was part of this wave of UFO disclosure that they were testing out at the time.
And he said on the record, one, not only do we know about UFOs and what they are, but we know who's operating.
That's a big deal for an official of his level.
And when I put these things out about Inman, I'm not trying to cast aspersions on him.
I'm saying the nexus that he was in, he was very familiar with the UFO file, therefore, may be able to bring forward things because of his background in the Central Intelligence Agency about this X Protect group that specialized in assassination.
Interestingly enough, he's the person who gives the career intelligence medal to George Joannides.
This is significant because, as deputy CIA director, he's aware of the activities of Joe Annides, which the CIA concealed from the public, from the Warren Commission, from the House Assassinations Committee.
Any government investigation, the CIA blocked around our friend, Joe Annides.
So, when I say you can put Inman under oath to say what Joe Annides was up to, it's to say he can be a witness against.
Joe Annides.
Joe Annides is dead, of course, but finding out the nature of what the CIA was doing with Joe Annides is crucial.
And there are 40 records of Joe and Eddie's in the government that we know of that are, you know, say what he was up to, the programs that he was up to.
What we do know from the reports is that he was the top psychological warfare officer in the CIA and that they instructed him at some point.
He was set up to create the legend of Oswald.
And he was there in New Orleans in the summer.
Of 1963, when Oswald was there and he was having those tangos with the Cubans, and then go on TV and saying, I'm a Marxist Leninist, all that stuff, and I run the Fair Play for Cuba committee.
It's very interesting because the piece that's missing when they talk about Joe Annides from the people who've really brought this forward, and we owe them a great debt that they found Joe Annides, the Jefferson Morley piece.
Problem is, that stuff doesn't go far enough.
The guy like Morley is very interesting because he knows that the CIA is covering up about Joe Annides, but he doesn't think that the CIA was responsible for the president's death.
And he would never talk about the UFO file or something like that.
This is a problem.
I've cited it before that you have these deep state researchers on one side and the UFO researchers on the other.
The deep state people understand how the government functions very well, but they don't open their minds up to the UFO piece.
The UFO researchers get involved with too much nonsense and are manipulated actually by the CIA very often.
We saw that with the TTSA, which were all CIA people.
And all the UFO researchers who, all those years, were saying, that government has to give us UFO information as soon as the CIA comes down and's like, hey, we have this new company.
Oh, they're all like, hey, we want to be in your documentaries and in your books.
So that whole wave, that kind of sentinel of UFO researchers who were supposed to.
You know, guard against that government coming in and doing that stuff.
They all stood down and high fived those guys.
So that was weird.
And I can tell you it was weird.
And I was right in the middle of it.
So I got to see it.
And when I would call it out, those people would say, you know, and they're very, these are big names around the UFO thing.
They would say, you're going to be made to look foolish, you know, basically because TTSA and Elizondo and all these people were going to take over and, you know, you're going to wish you were a fly on the wall with the stuff they're going to release and all this stuff.
Yeah, it's amazing.
Fitz told me a long time ago, she's like, Not only am I shocked that people sell out, but for how little they sell out.
It's remarkable.
And we've seen a lot of that, unfortunately.
That's another story.
But watch that UFO file and the CIA UFO threat wave going through there.
More Inman.
There's Inman with Casper Weinberger.
You know, he's a honcho in the Reagan administration, he's a honcho in the Carter administration, he's a honcho in the Clinton administration.
Inman knows a great deal.
And he went on to a very successful Career as a consultant and all these other groups and all the rest of it.
The thing is, in terms of Joe Annitti's, where they can't get anywhere, these researchers are going around, they're saying the CIA won't give us those files on it, but we know he was there and we know he was doing the Oswald project and we know he was signing off $50,000 per month for these groups that were there that were supposed to be anti Castro agitators and all that.
So if you translate those dollars from 1963 to the present, that's That's like half a million dollars a month to get these groups agitating.
What were the groups agitating for and what was he paying them for?
They were all saying as soon as Oswald was caught for the assassination and killed by Jack Ruby, they were the ones who ran ads and said, Oswald, he was connected to Cuba.
So they created the whole thing directly there under Joe Annides.
And Joe Annides created this entire wave around Oswald, set him up to look like he was a crazy communist and everything else.
Hidden OPC Stories and Agitation Costs00:04:23
In fact, here's another UFO file link for you.
And you know from watching this program, but Oswald was in New Orleans working for Guy Bannister, who was the person who created the X Files and studied the UFO cases for the FBI.
So, one of the things I'm fond of speaking about with Dr. Farrell is wherever you look around in the JFK case, you find aerospace and the UFO file.
It's undeniable.
So, that has to be reckoned with if you're going to do an investigation.
That's why a lot of these people don't get answers.
In relation to the Kennedy assassination, they're not looking in the right places and they get caught up with the CIA stories, which are like, hey, this Cuban was very angry about President Kennedy's policy, you know, and as if he thought that, you know, Johnson was going to be any better, right?
Johnson was from Texas and more conservative.
So that doesn't make any sense.
None of those propaganda points ever made sense.
All right.
Let's get a few things here about Joe Annides, because he's sort of the man of the hour when it comes to the assassination.
All right.
New records suggest George Joannides was one SAS operative.
I'm going to get to what that is.
The bulk of the available evidence indicates that Joannides in late 1963 was running a psychological warfare operation designed to link Lee Harvey Oswald to the Castro government without disclosing the CIA's hand.
That's crucial.
That's how X Protect works.
George Joannides is.
An important character in the Kennedy assassination, the son of a well known Greek American newspaper columnist in New York City.
He went to law school and joined the CIA in 1951.
Joe Nitty's fluent in Greek and French was sent to the Athens station.
By 1963, he was 40 years old, a rising protege of Tom Karamessines.
This is important.
Karamessines represents the OPC.
So there's a story here that is hidden and laying there on the record books about the OPC and what it was.
But basically, this is the unit that was doing covert activity and overthrowing governments and all that.
And the CIA were like what they were supposed to be doing was information gathering.
So at a certain point, this Office of Policy Coordination, Truman first goes to the CIA and says, That thing, you have to get them under control because they're running, it's like they're running their own government.
They're going to get us into trouble and get us into another world war.
So Get those people and merge them directly into the activities you're doing with the CIA.
What happens is those people that are engaged in these activities and, like, you know, throwing the Italian elections in 1948, this whole thing that they're engaged in and their activities are the types of activities, kind of like the Contra thing, you know, where it runs outside of the government.
And what happens, though, is that group.
Takes over in the CIA.
Instead of the CIA taming them, the whole CIA becomes OPC.
And this Joe Anniddies guy is working for the person who's the core of the OPC, along with Frank Wisner.
Okay, a little bit more on this.
Joe Anniddies was highly regarded for his skills in political action, propaganda, and psychological warfare operations.
This is the guy you put in charge of the Kennedy case.
Because if you're going to do the assassination, you're going to blame a lone nut, you need all these aspects.
You're going to need the guy who's already been doing this, who's an expert at it.
So he presented himself publicly as a Defense Department lawyer.
In fact, in 1963, he was with Dick Helms, man in Miami.
Helms, Richard Helms, the CIA director, is the guy who covers up the Kennedy assassination, and he becomes the point man for years.
Nixon, Helms, and the X Letter00:03:06
There's a classic conversation that came out recently, and these Watergate tapes just roll out sometimes.
This conversation.
Revealed that Nixon was talking with Helms and he was saying, Look, I've protected you, I've told so many lies for you, and you know, so I need to know a lot about what was going on with what the CIA was doing, you know, with the Kennedy assassination piece and you know, the whole who shot John angle like, you know, you need to tell me these things so I know so I can defend you.
And uh, Helms, being very clever and knowing that Nixon is taping him, sits there and doesn't say anything, you know, he knows that he's he's caught out, so um.
There's a nature of deep state blackmail that Scott has identified for years that's been taking place, and it goes on in these areas.
So, in that case, you know, you have Nixon trying to manipulate Helms into giving him information.
You have Helms, who is guilty and related to the Kennedy assassination through the CIA's action to eliminate President Kennedy.
So, he's trying to figure out how do we get rid of Nixon.
And, you know, LBJ, when he is leaving office, he has these very tense conversations with Nixon.
And the whole point is, you know, he's going in there and saying, I know very well that you were trying to prevent peace from happening in the peace talks from happening in Vietnam.
I have you taped.
And, you know, you're going to do this, this, and this for me.
And Nixon says to him, I'm not going to do anything for you because I know that you were aware of the plot to eliminate President Kennedy.
So this is the game that these people are playing.
In the middle of that game, Lyndon Johnson writes something called the X Letter.
And upon his death, says, you know, this comes out that there's a letter at the LBJ Library, which will be released in January of 2023.
And that letter has 75 pages, and nobody knows what it is.
Now, this is interesting because everyone assumed it was some sort of a dig at Nixon or there was something hardcore in there.
But LBJ did this for a purpose.
Now, this X letter resides at the LBJ Library in Texas.
What's weird is after Nixon died, there was an attempt by the person who was leading the library to open it.
And they opened and displayed two to three pages that were quickly classified, but they were a setup for something that was going to be in there.
They didn't actually explain what was in there, they were just saying, the reason I kept this letter secret, you know, that kind of stuff.
And Again, everyone assumes that what's in the X letter is related somehow to Nixon and that whole thing.
In fact, if you follow the ex steganography piece, you know that all these presidents are involved in some way with UFO disclosure.
Classified Secrets and Legacy Protection00:15:46
And so each one wants their part known along the way, which is why we have all of these archives that are out there that we know about.
That when the UFO piece came out publicly, well, then these presidents would be well recorded in history.
Their legacy about what they did with the UFO file would be secured.
And there is, in fact, an Eisenhower time capsule that's supposed to come out in 2049.
It's the same thing.
So, these are pieces that we need to understand.
And we need to understand the concept of stealth archives, which I've brought up on this program and brought forward as a kind of a core piece of the X series.
Because a stealth archive is just like what they're doing with the JFK records right now.
We know that those records are there.
We also have a sense that somehow those records implicate the Central Intelligence Agency.
So, it's an acknowledgement, and we know they're there.
However, This is the fascinating part.
We don't actually get our hands on them.
So it's just like an acknowledgement, but we don't get to see them.
And there's a lot of records like that in the government.
And the sex letter is another one that's like that as well.
So this is the nature of some of these things.
And it's funny because there's a judge that I brought up in the letter to Speaker McCarthy.
And the judge is Judge Tunheim.
Now, he's very interesting because he was appointed by Clinton to oversee the Assassination Record Review Board.
And although Clinton was very much a puppet of the Central Intelligence Agency, he's just the type who wanted to figure out how he can get leverage, how he can be on the top of the pyramid, which is what the Clintons try to do.
They tried to be the Bushes, and they haven't quite got it.
They can run all kinds of operations in Haiti, they can do drug running, but they can't.
Quite get to that level of the bushes.
But it's very interesting because the ARRB brought out significant documentation against the Central Intelligence Agency and it brought out Operation Northwoods, which is really important, especially when we look at 9 11.
It's another thing I want to mention about Jefferson Morley and the things that he brought forward.
You know, these are not, you know, these are still skating on the surface.
The Joe Nitty's thing is very important, but something about Morley is, you know, he's been involved in suing the CIA for records and things.
And at one point, Professor Scott joined him in that.
And he had to make this point that he didn't believe in Professor Scott's wacky ideas about a conspiracy around 9 11.
So, this is a problem, you know, it's like you can't see, if you can't see that deep state structure, if you're just like, oh, the CIA hid some files in 1963, you're not going to really get anywhere.
That's the nature, it's kind of the nature of why there's such a problem there.
Is that the level of researcher thinks that they can take the establishment piece and bring it over the finish line and get all the records and all that stuff?
The only thing that would happen with researchers like that is they'd be used as some kind of limited hangout if the government got caught on all this, even 60 years later, and they'd be like, Well, you know, yeah, we did hide it.
It was the mafia thing.
And then that person who they built up, you know, who was going after them for records, would have to go out and say, Well, they released this thing.
It's all about the mafia, you know, and that's how they'd get off the hook.
So it's very interesting to me.
Is a lot of people who do very good work.
And, you know, I respect the work, especially around Joe and Nitties, but there's an incredible blind side to this, which gets missed over and over again.
And for me, the core of that piece is not observing the aerospace connection, which is clearly sitting in the middle of the Kennedy assassination.
And we're going to get into that some more.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist special report here on the JFK assassination letter.
I sent a letter to.
Speaker McCarthy, and I read it at the top of the show.
And it's incoming Speaker McCarthy.
He's not Speaker yet, but he is the GOP leader, and he's going to be the Speaker of the House come January.
My suggestion was for him to create a House Assassination Committee 2023 to force the Central Intelligence Agency to bring forward their records, taking advantage of some of the interest that came about in relation to this.
Of course, we've been studying and looking at the Kennedy assassination for a long time.
Here may be an opportunity.
For them to do that, and they can compel testimony with the House Assassination Committee for 2023, and they can compel the CIA to bring forward those records.
That would be crucial because all these other attempts don't work, and the presidents are like, oh, the CIA director told me it would be dangerous.
And it's interesting.
One of the things I wanted to point out is I said to McCarthy that there was testimony that was public.
Comments that were public by Judge Napolitano, which I've brought up, but I think in the light of what's been happening, they're even more significant.
I'm going to play them here just briefly so we recall exactly what Napolitano said about his conversations with Trump and how this all came about in relation to the idea that Trump was supposed to release all the JFK records, and according to Napolitano, had a deep, deep desire to do so.
So something must have changed.
Listen to this.
All right.
Anyway, President Trump promised Stone many times he would release the JFK files.
And one time in one of my many conversations with him, I said, when are you going to do it?
And that's when he said to me, Judge, if you saw what I saw, you'd know why I can't release it.
What the hell did they show him?
Kennedy's brains blown out?
I don't know.
He wouldn't tell me, and I don't blame him for not telling me.
But I'm to this day trying to know what it was.
Yeah, that says a lot.
Trump is telling him in private, this is always what's crucial.
He's saying, Look, I can't release those records.
If you saw what was in those records, you wouldn't be able to do it.
So there is something, there's some mechanism in those records that somehow was left over.
Can I suggest something?
Oh, yeah.
Okay.
Well, Val says, I have zero confidence that Kevin McCarthy will do the right thing here.
He's not in that position because he's an honest guy, but I appreciate the effort.
My question is if Kevin McCarthy.
Is going to be ineffectual about this.
Can we pressure Trump to just come out and tell what he knows?
Yeah, that's very interesting.
Well, the McCarthy thing is the focus right now because McCarthy has the ability to compel the Central Intelligence Agency to release the files.
You know, Trump being in the situation where he's being sued and charged with releasing secrets and all the rest of it.
It's probably not an ideal time for him to be saying, Hey, I have classified secrets I'm going to bring forward.
But McCarthy has the ability to put the central intelligence people on record and make them release the records.
The president has the ability to compel the release of the records.
Biden's not going to do it.
He's made that very clear, and they keep playing this ridiculous game.
The thrust of what we've seen, though Trump looking at the records saying, you wouldn't believe what's in there, the whistleblower who went to Tucker Carlson and said, the records prove the CIA was involved, the research around Joe Anniddies, you know, and the thing, the fact that nobody even knew.
That he was involved in the House Assassinations Committee, that this was the same guy who was the psychological warfare operation official who created the Oswald Project.
That's huge.
Those people didn't know, and now we do.
And that's on record.
We just don't know the extent of what Joe Annettis was doing.
We don't know those details.
We can get those details in the records.
So there's something in those records that has been seen.
Now, I've brought this up before, but about within a half hour of the assassination, Bobby Kennedy has a meeting.
With then CIA director John McCone, and he meets him in Virginia.
And there's something in that exchange because Bobby knows what's taking place.
He indicates it to a number of people.
So there's some mechanism that's been created for creating those records that if they try to scrub the record of what they had in the background, that somehow it would set off these alarm bells.
That's the only way that those records would survive and that people would look at them and say, oh, You know, there's a problem here because there'd be no reason for the, you know, the ultra secret operations to be on file.
But there's something about Kennedy's presence immediately with the central intelligence director that gives me the impression that there is something in those records.
That's why they've been such a political football over the past 60 years.
Now it makes sense.
And I can tell you that for years and looking at it, I kind of thought what other people thought hey, they'd never put anything of significance in those records anyway.
Well, there's obviously something.
There's some trail that's been left in there on purpose.
And that's the thing that they've been avoiding.
The three record sets give us the nature of this.
The three record sets they're blocking are the Joe Annettis files, the Jim Garrison files, and the files on E. Howard Hunt.
E. Howard Hunt famously came forward to his friend, Douglas Caddy, the Watergate lawyer.
And Douglas Caddy on this program said what Howard Hunt told him in relation to the Kennedy assassination.
He said Kennedy was assassinated over the UFO file.
So, if he was assassinated over the UFO file, but he wasn't just assassinated because of the UFO file, he was assassinated because he wanted to share it with the Russians.
So, this is significant because there's a lot of data around this.
As a matter of fact, the memo that comes up very often about President Kennedy requesting from the director of Central Intelligence.
Now, this isn't an MJ 12 document, it's a FOIA requested document, and the CIA has never reputed it.
So, there are documents like the Byrne memo and stuff, which, you know, we don't know the provenance.
So, therefore, it's an iffy thing.
This is very different.
And this comes from William Lester in his book.
Now, what's interesting is if you look at the memo, which requests all the high threat cases, UFO cases, from the Central Intelligence Director and says you need to share them with NASA, and we're going to do this because we're going to share it with the Russians because we don't want a nuclear incident, basically.
And the other interesting thing about this is he wants a report coming up for February of 1964.
He won't make it to 1964.
But what also, I think, grabs me when I think about this memo, which has been floating around for a number of years and isn't part of this, you know, triage of documents that just came out.
And there's a lot of this document that's been redacted as well.
But I think what is significant is that there are documents at the Kennedy Library which crisscross directly and dramatically with this document.
And they're called Cooperation with the Soviet Union in Outer Space.
So, Kennedy had changed the thrust of the going to the moon program to be a joint moon mission, which means they'd have to share whatever technology getting to the moon was going to come up with with the Soviets.
Now, this is a problem because part of the mysticism around the whole Apollo thing and why people think we didn't go to the moon and things like that is because there was an awful lot of secrecy about it.
And they lost all the tapes of how they did it and all those nonsense.
So, there was something utilized.
In our Apollo missions, a type of technology that wasn't put on the record.
That's the exotic technology.
This, you know, the work of Farrell and others, that's the conclusion that they come to.
So if Kennedy is saying, look, you know, we're doing a joint moon mission, there's not going to be a space race, no weapons in space, and I've worked this out, Khrushchev's son, Sergey, goes on the record and says, my dad was working with him behind the scenes and he was writing him letters and saying, Kennedy is really, you know, like he's not like the other ones.
He wants to really end this whole war piece.
And he said that I am agreeing to go to the moon with these guys.
So that's on record that they had this going on.
The UFO piece in the heart of it makes sense.
Now let's think about Caddy's confession again, or Hunt's confession to Caddy.
This is significant because he puts on the record John Kennedy was killed over the UFO file because he was going to give our most vital national security secret to the Russians.
So this allows them on their side to say he's a national security threat, so we can throw all the rules out the window and assassinate him.
So, that structure, you know, they can get people to go along with them by using this.
The aerospace piece and the aerospace aspects, including the dinosaur program that was going on in the government at the time, there are hints, there are activities that are unauthorized that are going on in relation to space.
So, you know, there's such a dense defense contractor, space contractor.
Aerospace piece around this, including the fact that when Jim Garrison, the DA in New Orleans, goes into the Kennedy case and he's researching Oswald, it's weird.
All the people that Oswald was working with at Riley Coffee, they say, well, he said he was going to go to work for NASA.
This is his big dream, you know?
And when he goes to find the people who were working at the same time, they're all in NASA jobs or in other aerospace jobs.
So the piece of Oswald's And aerospace goes back to Atsugi in Japan when he was in the same unit that was tied up with U 2 activities.
Fletcher Proudy put that on record, and he was the liaison between the CIA and the Joint Chiefs.
He would know.
So the CIA unit that was using Oswald, this is 1959.
Oswald was born in 1939, he's 20 years old, being used in a top secret classified, ultimate classified program, which is the U 2.
This is before it was shot down and the Russians knew about it.
And you have Lee Oswald with access to it?
Well, it's interesting because Garrison says that one of the records that they've put off to 2039 is Lee Harvey Oswald's access to the U2.
That tells you a lot about who Oswald was.
Pentagon Files and U-2 Origins00:14:41
He was a secret keeper, whatever they were using him for.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show deep here tonight on the special report.
I haven't even gotten to this Tunheim section, Tunheim section of Judge from Minnesota.
We're taking some of your questions here shortly.
And we'll do maybe about another half hour.
Okay.
A couple of things.
Interestingly enough, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tweeted out The CIA's murder of my uncle was a successful coup d'etat from which our democracy has never recovered.
So, and, you know, Robert is coming back on this program.
He was on our program last year.
He's going to come back on the program, and we have things to talk about in relation to the work that he's doing with his incredible.
Expose of Fauci and all the rest, but I will get to some of this with him.
But I think the language that he's using here is very clear again, it's becoming very clear that the society can't accept you know the kind of false dance.
It's like you get to a point where there's a paradigm shift where the old paradigm just looks too ridiculous, and we're getting to that in society with this.
Interestingly enough, a lot of the you know floating things that you've seen about Trump's taxes, you know, and uh, oh.
His tax returns got released.
They're crisscrossing time wise exactly with the release of these ridiculous budget figures, the NDAA and the $1.6 trillion.
It's going out the window with Republican and Democrat all signing on to this nonsense.
That's the way to look at how they release things and how they confuse this process.
So I think that they're having trouble with the Kennedy thing every time it comes up.
It's something that dents their credibility over and over again.
And they haven't been able to spin it in total.
And withholding the records is absurd 60 years later.
There's no reason for it.
Even people who believe the official story don't think there's a reason for it.
Remember, Tunheim is an interesting character.
And I'm going to point this out.
He's somebody, even though he was appointed to head up this assassination record review board, he is somebody who believed the official story completely.
But I find some interesting things about him, which is why I identified him as somebody.
Who helped with the Fox News story?
Okay, Judge Tunheim says JFK files were probably unlawfully withheld by the CIA.
There's Tunheim.
At a Washington press conference Thursday, this is 2017, he came out recently and did the same thing.
Remember, previously he was kind of going along with the official story.
Kennedy was shot dead in Dallas November 22, 1963.
Incredibly enough, thousands of pages of government files related to his murder remain secret.
54 years later.
We'll try 60 years later now.
It's time to release them all, Tunheim said.
There's no real reason to protect this information.
Some 3,500 JFK documents in the National Archives database alone.
Most of the records are generated by the CIA.
The JFK Records Act of 1992 requires these records to be released October 26, 2017, as we know.
Okay, again, this time it's about a month after that report.
The federal judge who oversaw the collection of government documents on John F. Kennedy's assassination called it disappointing that President Donald Trump is holding back so many of the records while the CIA, FBI, and other agencies review them.
And in fact, this goes to the strangeness of Trump not allowing all those records out.
Although he got some significant records out, they were far more significant than the document dump that Biden did.
But they fell far short of the mark.
Tunheim is going to be interesting in all this because there's a reason he's out there and right now saying this is the law and you have to follow it.
Now, Tunheim has also seen the records, so he knows a great deal.
And remember, he was somebody who was originally a promoter of the original, you know, ridiculous lone gunman story.
So, this is somebody who isn't, you know, trying to give the government a hard time, but he realizes, uh oh, something's going on here.
And now, today, Tunheim, literally an hour or so, just an incredible crisscross of timing, after I sent my certified letter to Kevin McCarthy, we find out this.
In response to last week's partial release of JFK. Assassination records, Judge John Tunheim, former chair of the Assassination Record Review Board, called on Congress to hold an oversight hearing.
I'm hoping that Congress will react to the latest rounds of nondisclosures with a hearing to determine why the 1992 law is not being followed, Tunheim said.
There's something going on in the background here, which is why there was the original false release of BBC and everybody saying, hey, the CIA released all these Oswald records, and then the actual release, which had nothing, which was one of the worst releases in years.
Now we have Tunheim saying they should have a hearing.
This is a significant sea change considering he was the guy who was observing the records.
And then I have a letter here that he wrote December 5th to President Biden going on this thing saying, Well, I'm hoping you're releasing all those records on the 15th because the CIA doesn't have any legal leg to stand on.
So there's a weird crisscross here, and it's not what you would expect because you do expect.
Typically, the media would just block the whole idea of the thing, but they're playing a game with it.
And the game seems to be we're going to pretend that this stuff is coming out, or they're getting ready to let the CIA do the whole thing.
Carlos Marcello did it, and we saved the world.
And by the way, space aliens are demons.
And that's what we've been doing with all those trillions of dollars that are missing.
So we have a weird process going on, and Tunheim is right in the middle of it somehow because his presence there is odd.
To me, in the middle of all this, why are we seeing this wave that seems to suggest, hey, the government let out that the JFK thing was caused by the CIA and Oswald was with the CIA?
They didn't.
It didn't come out that way at all.
But everyone suggested, like Newsweek and BBC, that the Mary Farrell Foundation had got those records and that they were showing them around and all the rest.
When, as I said, they filed a case against the Biden administration, but they won't hear back till January.
Something is ping ponging inside that system that everyone's trying to get ahead of.
And maybe it's the fact that there are going to be disclosures around this case, and they're all trying to get ahead of the spin on it.
So, the spin for everybody is hey, the government let out all these Lee Harvey Oswald records that show he was with the CIA, when in fact, the actual release of the records is one of the worst, most disappointing, and it doesn't say anything about Oswald with the CIA.
So, the government rollout completely blocking access to the information.
And supporting that CIA position, but the news media pretending, hey.
And I'm going to read you one of the stories.
This is Newsweek.
Okay, this is a week before the files came out.
New documents shed light on CIA's connection to Lee Harvey Oswald.
New documents.
That's Newsweek, which, you know, as of course, bans the dark journalists, as we know that.
On social media, Newsweek has blocked me thoroughly.
All right, can't ask too many good questions.
Corps of researchers looking into the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy say they have unearthed proof to his alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, being involved in an operation by the CIA mere months before the killing, reigniting questions about whether the Oswald truly was alone in his decision to kill the youngest man ever elected president.
In a Tuesday press conference at the National Press Club, Jefferson Morley, a veteran of the DC Press Corps, expert on the JFK assassination, With the Mary Farrell Foundation, he told reporters that he and attorneys with the foundation obtained documentation relating to a still classified covert operation approved by senior CIA officials three months before Kennedy's death that suggested the agency used Oswald for intelligence purposes several weeks prior to the shooting.
Now, here's what's interesting they did go to the press club in Washington and they did, you know, he did discuss Joe and Idies and all the rest of it.
They never said anything about a document and they haven't been able to get anything.
As I said, because their case doesn't come up until January.
Here's what Newsweek says The document, one of several researchers obtained this month as the result of an October lawsuit, is a precursor to a fuller reason of documents anticipated by the National Archives this month.
Okay, so there never was a document that was received as the result of a court case.
It didn't happen because, you know, it doesn't even come up for a month.
So, what are they talking about?
This article becomes the trigger for all these other articles.
Remember when the TTSA article came out saying there's a tic tac?
And it was Politico that had to be the heads up for the New York Times to be able to run it because they were the ones who were playing tag and saying the New York Times is going to do this article.
And so they were laying this thing out.
And then everybody got this phony tic tac story.
And the tic tac and that whole thing, if you look at it deeply, there's no proof.
Of the tic tac and the UFO thing.
And it could have easily been, you know, what they were using our own exotic technology to freak out their own Navy pilots.
And there was no whistleblower Elizondo.
He was just working for the government and they called him an ex Pentagon employee when he was working for the Pentagon.
So they've been running ops like this through the media.
And what they do is they get everyone all hyped up about something.
Now let's go to the Tucker Carlson one.
Everyone says this is an incredible.
Fox News came out and said the CIA was connected just like these articles.
But in this case, he said, Well, I have a whistleblower who said this.
And he said, He's seen all the records.
And as a result of seeing all the records, what does he say?
He says, I actually, you know, the CIA was involved in the assassination.
All right.
So now let's connect a little dots of our own.
Tunheim resurfaces out of nowhere and starts saying the CIA is lying about these Joe and Nitty's files, and they're violating the law by not releasing all the records as they were instructed to by October 2017.
Now, remember, originally, he believed all this stuff.
Well, an interesting thing came up, which is at one point, those Joe and Itty's files fell into the lap of Tunheim in the 90s when he was looking at all this stuff.
And the CIA leaned over his shoulder and said, That guy's a nobody, just forget about those.
So, in my opinion, this is pent up resentment on the part of Tunheim for them lying to him.
And he does go on the record saying that they lied to him about it.
I think behind the scenes, he went ahead and did the Tucker Carlson.
And told them, yeah, they were lying about the records.
That makes sense to me.
And that also adds up why Tunheim is suddenly all around.
Now, the question is what's going on here in relation to all this?
Can you get to the thrust of the Central Intelligence Agency killed President Kennedy?
Can you get that on the record?
So obviously, they're testing reaction by putting out a phony story they can't get any trouble over because it's just Newsweek saying that these other people had records when they didn't.
But the actual release didn't have any of those records, didn't say anything about the CIA and Oswald.
So they've got both the best of both worlds.
They have their records out that completely don't show them guilty of anything.
And they have this phony story where they can gauge the public's reaction.
How would this go over?
Could we survive, in fact?
You know, that whole idea that you took out your own president, could the Central Intelligence Agency survive that?
No, they couldn't.
And they shouldn't, because they are an extra constitutional agency that the people who.
Cooperated in setting them up, regretted.
And, you know, it's important to note that President Harry Truman, after the JFK assassination, a month to the day, wrote an op ed in the Washington Post that said, you know, the CIA basically, this is not what we set it up for.
Now it's a Frankenstein, mend it or end it.
And, you know, he was taken on by Alan Dulles, who immediately flew down to St. Louis and said, you can't say that.
You know, you're going to have to retract that.
And he said, You know, you can't threaten me.
I'm an old guy.
I served as president.
Like, you know, get out of here.
Dulles went back and wrote that Truman was feeble minded.
This was their response.
This is the contempt that the Central Intelligence Agency had.
Well, remember, it's on the record from Dulles' aide of many years in a bio that he wrote years later.
He said that whenever Dulles would talk about Kennedy, he got uncharacteristically angry and said, You wouldn't believe that Kennedy, he thought he was a god.
Mafia Ties and Homeland Security Takeover00:09:25
And you have to think about it, you know.
Dulles and his brother doing all the deals that they did, setting up the world, World War II, cooperating with the Nazis in all the things that they were engaged in, that they thought that they had set up the world in such and such a way.
And here comes this whole Kennedy, Camelot wing, and he's saying, I'm going to bring freedom, is going to be the new thing that people are going to march toward, and we'll resist the whole war aspect with the Russians by showing how great our free side is, but we're not going to.
Engage with them on this war level, and we're even going to go to the moon with them and stuff.
So, Kennedy's anathema to what they have set up.
And when we go deeper into that level, in the heart of it is this X Protect group, which you'll find always around the UFO file.
And it's very obvious, floats to the surface very early on in the deaths of people like Morris Jessup and the strange encounters that people had, who were the kind of classic early witnesses around the phenomena.
That aspect of X Protect is the crucial missing link in all of this.
I've got a couple more things to read here, and then we're going to go to your questions.
Let's do that.
This is Professor Scott talking about the nature of the environment that we're in.
And he's calling them cryptocracies.
The power of cryptocracies to influence history becomes even greater, as we shall see when they're acted in concert with forces allied to powerful international drug traffic.
This is an important thing to understand about the term deep state.
It was adopted heavily during the Trump years.
But I had done a series of interviews with Professor Scott all the way back in 2014.
Almost nobody even used the term at all.
Professor Scott invented it back in the 90s.
Now, where it came from was a case where there was a car crash in Turkey.
And in that car crash, there were a number of very interesting people all together.
You had a member of parliament.
You had the police chief, you had the top drug trafficker, the head of these gangs in Turkey, and you had a beauty queen.
And they all perished together in this car crash in Turkey.
And the term deep state came out of that because it was the perfect snapshot of all these very interesting forces working together.
So when we think about the deep state and we think about these different things, very often people go to the mafia and, you know, the mafia is this and the mafia that.
You have to understand the way that Professor Scott laid out the deep state for me is the mafia, organized crime is a significant layer, but it's beneath these other pieces.
So the intelligence agencies don't answer to the mafia.
The mafia answers to the intelligence agencies.
So we have to get that relationship right.
And then when you're dealing with the intelligence agencies, they're not really what they say they are.
As I've pointed out before, the Central Intelligence Agency was founded in Sullivan and Cromwell.
And these are lawyers who deal with what?
International finance.
This is what they are.
They're representatives of international finance.
I've used the example of I'm a company and I want to set up these oil fields in Uzbekistan.
And I'm going to set up this whole thing and invest all this money.
However, if there's a revolution in Uzbekistan, then I'm going to go, I'm going to say that again Uzbekistan.
If there's a revolution in Uzbekistan and I'm going to lose everything, they'll nationalize the oil fields, I'll be out.
So, I need a reason for US forces to be in there protecting my oil fields.
So, suddenly we have a determination that there's been some kind of violation by that military and they shot at our forces.
So, we need to put a force in there.
And this is what you get the Ukraine thing is also related to this.
So, we have to understand that relationship and what the Central Intelligence Agency actually represents versus the idea of them, hey, we're getting spy information and we're giving it back to the president.
That was the fantasy of what they were going to do.
Instead, they became their own enforcement arm.
President Kennedy said to Arthur Schlesinger that when he got in the White House, he could not, even with all of his knowledge and all of his family's knowledge about the CIA and how the world worked and everything else, he could not believe the amount of things that the Central Intelligence were doing unchecked with no oversight, that they were overthrowing countries, that they were determining global policy on their own.
Well, what's happened since President Kennedy's time?
They've grown.
They have not been, except for a brief period in the 70s, reformed.
There's no real reform.
They just went offshore and came back, and under the Reagan and Bush administrations, grew up to this size again.
They've taken over things like the Department of Homeland Security.
Hello, quarter of a million employees.
And they are trying to create this domestic surveillance piece on a more dramatic scale using the technology, while our friends over in the Davos crowd are creating the biometric tracking.
So, this becomes one kind of global Frankenstein sort of world brain thing.
And what we look at with the Central Intelligence Agency is the dominant group who enforces the rule through the media.
You know, they're the ones who are feeding stories to the media, they're the ones who are feeding stories to entertainment.
This is the group.
And they sit there in the middle of all this.
And, you know, we have other groups like the NSA and the FBI and all these other things.
I'm not saying that they don't.
Operate in the same fashion.
But the thing is, the Central Intelligence Agency has collected all that power unto itself.
And to not be accountable, this is the nature of the problem that we have with the kind of schizophrenic situation in democracies around the world, but in America in particular, because America is not set up this way and it does not comport with who we are as a nation and the Constitution and everything else to have this agency that can go around and do these illegal things around the world and We don't have any oversight.
So, when it comes to President Kennedy's assassination, it's understanding the clash, the roots of the clash, and what it is we're actually talking about.
It's not just personalities and like a Game of Thrones.
What is that Kevin Spacey show about the White House?
Oh, man.
House of Cards.
House of Cards.
Yeah.
So, you know, I was saying this, and I mentioned this to you the other day, that I think what they're doing.
With Twitter and with social media in general, is ever since they took soap operas off the air, right, which they largely have done, at least over the last decade or so, I think they've channeled all that soap opera stuff so that everyone's like, oh, you know, Elon's threatening to step down.
You know, his girlfriend said something about him.
You know, it's all this stuff.
And what it reminds me of is the idiocy that when I was growing up with people getting overly involved in soap operas.
Pretty much the same way.
So I'm like, oh my God, they've channeled all this false soap opera stuff.
And now we're just following these supposedly real people and all their ridiculousness.
And this is getting pretty ridiculous.
So, you know, I think it's the nature of the situation that we're in, understanding how manipulated that reality can get us closer to a genuine stasis, you know, sense of reality on all this.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show, going deep, deep, deep tonight on the JFK assassination.
This is a special report trying to catch up on some of the moves and the aftermath of the Tucker story, the strangeness of that.
And again, I want to stress that there's a potency problem.
As much as I'm glad to see these windows opening up of people talking about important things, and sometimes it looks like when you look at that Twitter trending thing, it looks like the X series from 2018, maybe.
And it's interesting to me because I think on their side, they're looking at a lot of things that people are interested in, have a genuine interest in.
And they're thinking, well, if people are interested in these things, how can we co opt them?
In order to get it on our side.
And so that the UFO threat thing was part of that.
Like, hey, maybe instead of holding back the record, we'll pretend to give them the record and just say this thing is after them.
And they'll give us more money and power to consolidate our hold.
So, this is the nature of how we look at the manipulative nature of the structure that we're in and how easy it is to manipulate.
Because at this point, the same thing with a phone, it would take maybe weeks of watching TV to get the same thing you can get in a day.
Co-opting Interest with UFO Threats00:14:48
With the kind of programming you can do through a smartphone with someone.
So, getting ourselves on an even level, if we understand these things, then they lose their effect dramatically, which is crucial.
Okay.
Professor Scott's quote The piece that I think is interesting is he's talking about cryptocracies and cryptomony, international drug traffic.
I propose the word cryptonomy.
To name this unrecorded illicit but nonetheless important shadow economy, it's no accident that cryptocracies and the cryptonomy work in concert.
The cryptonomy is so large and so powerful that governments have no choice but to plan to manage it, even before attempting to suppress it.
In other words, you have all these drugs being shipped into the country.
Instead of busting everybody who's doing it, you just open up the border and say, okay, we'll manage the drug flow.
This is the third factor contributing to the invisible alliance of cryptocracies.
And the cryptonomy, the power of the independently wealthy and of the banks that cater to them.
Informed observers of American politics have more than once commented to me that most of the hundred wealthiest people in the U.S. know each other, and in addition, often have connections to both the CIA and to organized crime.
There is no shortage of anecdotal examples.
James Angleton of the CIA counterintelligence delivering the sole eulogy at the small private funeral.
Of Howard Hughes.
He talks about Joseph Kennedy Sr. being a point holder in the same casino, Cal Neva, as Sam Gincana.
More relevant to the milieu of the JFK assassination is the example of Clint Merkison Sr.
Merkison paid for the horse racing holidays of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover at the same time he sold stakes in his investments to mob figures like Jerry Catena and enjoyed political influence in Mexico.
These connections are no accident.
More often than not, the extremely wealthy become that way by ignoring or bending the rules of society, not by observing them.
In corrupting politicians and in bypassing them to secure an unauthorized foreign intercessions, both the mob and the CIA can be useful allies.
In addition, drug profits need to be laundered, and banks can derive a significant percentage of their profits by laundering them or otherwise bending or breaking the rules for their host.
Country.
Citibank came under congressional investigation after having secretly moved $80 million for Raul Salinas de Gotari, brother of former Mexican President Carlos Salinas.
This is a great snapshot.
And of course, nobody does it like Professor Scott, summarizing that influence of those groups and the crisscross there, not alienating just one thing and saying, oh, the mob is doing this or whatever, but showing that synthesis, which I think is absolutely crucial.
Another quote.
We'll see how many I can get in here.
Oh, this one's about the records.
I'm going to save that one.
I thought this was interesting.
One of the things that came out in the last batch of documents previous to this one was about J. Edgar Hoover's role.
And Hoover, of course, somebody who played on all the sides of these fences and tried to make sure that mob characters weren't prosecuted, which is very interesting.
Someone who also played that deep state blackmail.
Sex game using his agents to tape record the liaisons of these senators and presidents and then blackmailing them to do what he wanted.
So, scholars and other experts have repeatedly said it's unlikely that there's anything groundbreaking in the JFK documents.
But as journalists and historians poured through the enormous database of material recently, some interesting nuggets were turning up, among them Hoover's November 24th memo.
Hoover appeared to be particularly concerned that the public would have to be.
Held to believe that Oswald was a lone actor, not part of a larger conspiracy.
In 1964, the Warren report on Kennedy's assassination, Hoover was firm in stating that he hadn't seen the evidence suggesting a conspiracy.
Now, it could actually be easily said that Hoover was a part of the conspiracy because his own power had diminished under the weight of Robert Kennedy being attorney general.
Referring to Nicholas Katzenbach, the deputy attorney general at the time, Hoover dictated, The thing I'm concerned about.
And so is Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real and only assassin.
Now, if you were somebody who was investigating, you're an FBI director, here you are on the 24th, okay, which is two days after the assassination and the day of the assassin getting shot, fretting that the public might think there are other people involved beyond Oswald, when you haven't had a chance to check it out yourself, obviously.
You would want the public, you know, you'd want to check that out and you'd want the public to be on board with you.
Hoover also indicated that his concern was influenced in part by diplomacy, dictating that there could be serious international implications if the public thought Oswald might have been part of a larger plot.
This is how they did it that they would use these themes so that they could get officials, senators, media organizations, and say, look, you know, if we know there was more than Oswald to this, but if you expose that, There's going to be a world war and it might go nuclear.
So you have to lie just for now, though.
Don't worry, in 75 years, everyone will know the truth and it'll be copacetic.
Of course, 75 years later, nobody's going to get any answers.
One thing I wanted to put on the record, which might help us also, and I'm going to round up my JFK coverage here with this, is the case of Richard Case Miguel.
Miguel is very important because.
He's somebody who Dick Russell had found was involved in these operations very early on with the CIA and around Oswald.
And one of the interesting pieces with him is that his testimony, when he gives it to Russell and they re engage when the Assassination Record Review Board comes up, he's found dead unexpectedly, which is one of the strange deaths associated with the ARRB.
Miguel is kind of a mirror of Oswald in a number of ways.
He's used as a double and a triple agent at times.
One of the jobs that he had for the CIA.
Was to go over to the Russians and to say, I'm offering my services to you.
They'd meet in Berlin and all that.
They were very interested in how this government was using Oswald.
And they were afraid, according to Egal, that the government was going to use Oswald as a Patsy in the JFK assassination.
He's going to assassinate some major figure and it's going to be blamed on us.
So that's how deep this plot was already out there.
And they had him tracking.
Oswald.
And the weird thing is, when he gets to New Orleans, he finds out there's another one.
There's this Harvey Lee Oswald.
And he's like Oswald, but he's not Oswald.
But he obviously fronts as Oswald.
And at a certain point, he has instructions to kill the other Oswald in New Orleans.
And that other Oswald dies, and he doesn't have to do it.
So they move Oswald out from New Orleans to Texas, and his CIA handlers.
Tell him to track this guy.
And they're starting to give him identification as Oswald.
So on September 25th, before the assassination, this guy walks into a bank in El Paso and shoots a single shot into the ceiling of the bank.
And he waits there patiently for the cops to get there.
And when they get there, he says, Boy, am I relieved to see you.
And they put him in jail.
And they're like, What are you trying to do, rob the bank?
And he's like, Put me in prison because I don't want to be around for what's going on.
And he wants a way to hide himself from the intelligence agencies that he's been involved with.
One of the things that they find in his trunk, and remember this is weeks before the assassination, is an identity card of Lee Harvey Oswald.
So he's got an Oswald identity card in his trunk.
So the CIA tracking Oswald, there are all kinds of threads.
That are obvious.
And in the case of Niguel, his story about the whole thing was that the people who were showing up, the CIA people who were showing up to give him instructions, were changing so rapidly that he started to wonder who he was meeting with exactly.
This is where the X Protect piece comes in, because the way that the X Protect piece works is you.
Have confusion.
And so you have people doing things for you without them even knowing what it is.
One of the interesting things about Nigel is that, you know, and there's a great book there with Russell, and Russell's been on this program before, but Russell tells us all about his meetings with Nigel and the things that Nigel told him.
And he said, look, you know, they had me tracking Oswald.
The CIA had me tracking him and they had me flipping over to the Russians.
And then when I got to the Russians, the Russians had me tracking him.
So everyone was on Oswald's.
They were looking to utilize that asset.
And the Russians were worried that he was going to be used against them.
And they wanted him to be assassinated.
Interestingly enough, according to Niguel and the CIA, at a certain point, you know, they are telling him, give us all the information about Oswald, watch him closely.
His, what he said was that Oswald was, of course, in CIA intelligence.
He was working for CIA, which is how they had him tracking.
So we have these things on the record.
There's a lot on the record in relation to this.
And this is what, you know, the kind of lame mainstream media stories about this don't get into.
That there's already an incredible layer brought forward by what?
Not mainstream media reports, by deep independent researchers.
And they have the facts on their side.
And it's not, you know, one of the things that came up with Morley recently is he was like, hey, I was on MSNBC and, you know, we talked about things and it wasn't like, you know, we didn't argue over conspiracies or anything like that.
We were just colleagues who respected each other.
Look, you know, those people.
That whole branch of things, they're never going to accept genuine research.
So there's not going to be any kissing up to them.
It's not going to happen.
So just go and do the real research and don't worry about MSNBC or Washington Post or any of that stuff.
And with that, Miss Olivia, your questions are on.
Okay.
A lot of people are asking.
Miguel did not rob the bank, he just shot into the ceiling.
No, he just shot into the ceiling and waited.
He waited on the corner for the police to arrive and seemed relieved when they put him in custody.
And it's interesting because we all know that Fletcher Proudy is Mr. X in the Garrison movie, JFK movie.
But in fact, he's a fusion of Fletcher Proudy and Niguel.
And Niguel is actually the one who meets with him and tells him these things.
And he has him meet him in a park in New York.
It wasn't in DC.
And Fletcher Proudy, what Proudy was doing was sending letters to Garrison.
And that's where the whole like Mr. X, all that information that he got, those are from letters.
But the person that he's meeting, the actual Mr. X, is Niguel, interestingly enough.
And Niguel's story is very unusual.
He's right in the heart of all this stuff.
But again, he's like a mirror image of Oswald.
He grows up in an orphanage.
Well, Oswald spent a lot of time in an orphanage, actually, growing up.
Even though he had a brother and a mother, he had two brothers.
And, you know, but there were times, there was a time there where she couldn't care for him and he had to go in an orphanage.
Well, what happened then?
And was that, you know, Oswald was targeted at a very early age and the things that they did with him are extraordinary.
Remember, there's a person named Kerry Thornley who was his Marine buddy.
And Kerry Thornley writes a novel about Oswald while, you know, before the assassination or anything called, like, I think it's called Golden Warrior.
And in that book that he's writing about Oswald in the novel, Oswald has a twin.
So that's strange.
And Kerry Thornley said that he was convinced that they had done at Atsugi, where they both were.
He said Oswald had a higher security clearance than he did.
This is the level that Oswald was on.
He wasn't, you know, this guy who was stacking books at the Texas School Book Depository.
He was a member of Defense Industrial Security Command.
Working at a building owned by a major aerospace contractor, Donald H. Byrd, whose cousin was Richard Byrd, who, you know, done all the exploration of Antarctica.
I mean, there's a lot there and it opens things up dramatically.
Yes.
Tim Houston, DJ, you should discuss the odd case of Rose Sheramie.
Yes.
Well, there's a number of cases.
Attlee Phillips and Ruby's Knowledge00:03:51
That's an early one where she has information when they take her into the hospital before the assassination, where she says they're going to assassinate the president.
They're coming into Dallas now, and she had worked as a drug runner for Ruby.
And there was this whole thing where she said, well, you know, After the assassination, she said, Well, Ruby knew Oswald for years.
But what's significant about her is she put on the record previous to the assassination that it was going to happen.
You know, Karen Kupsonet from the Female Targets episode that we just did recently, being the daughter of Mel, you know, who was big in Chicago and knew Ruby, she knew about the assassination before it was going to take place.
And she called the FBI and the authorities, you know, a half hour before it happened.
And then she, of course, mysteriously died.
She was a very promising actress.
She was only 22 years old.
So there's a lot of that, you know, the death thing around the Kennedy assassination.
This is an interesting thing, too, when they're like, oh, conspiracy theories or whatever.
Think about the people who came forward, you know, and said things, went on the record, and either they died or a loved one died or whatever.
And there are generations of these people.
Is it to them to try to blow it off the way that they have?
It's actually, you know, in my opinion, it's the nature of the situation with the media is so schizophrenic.
And one of the reasons why it's journalism and dark journalism in particular that I'm engaged in with this is that the media has failed so horribly at their job and they've become such tools for the very thing that's harvesting humanity that for me, media is the central problem in American life.
And certainly around the globe.
Yes.
Okay, Brad Briggs.
George Joannides is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.
That's really good.
A little Manchurian candidate.
Florian Geyer, CIA Chief of Western Operations David Attlee Phillips ran Cuban Alpha 66 and DRE, and his subordinate was Joannides, who interacted with Lee Harvey Oswald.
And Caritas Tarot says, wasn't Joannides also the quote doctor involved with Tex and the Manson family member murderer?
That's interesting.
You know, these are people that crisscross significantly.
The first part of that, David Attlee Phillips, what's interesting about him is that he was operational in Mexico, but he was living in Fort Worth and he had access to where Oswald was.
So there's a guy who was the leader of Alpha 66, a very significant group.
That was financed by the Americans to help overthrow Castro.
And one of the meetings that he has with Attlee Phillips, Oswald is there.
So Oswald is working with Attlee Phillips.
Now, he gets shot and he was quiet for a long time, but then he comes back out on the 50th anniversary and says, for the record, here's my statement David Attlee Phillips.
You know, was working with Lee Harvey Oswald.
So these people have gone on the record.
We have a lot of testimony from people who worked with the government and worked in those covert programs that have gone on the record with it.
The question is, with that level, especially the records from the House Assassination Committee, you want to talk about a records problem?
MJ-12 Informants and Equilibrium Forces00:15:52
We don't get to see those records until 2039.
That's ridiculous.
Think about it.
The CIA records are ridiculous.
The House assassination records are ridiculous.
Release it all.
I'm sure that none of those agents are alive anymore.
And many of those countries aren't even.
The Soviet Union doesn't exist.
Castro's not in Cuba, leading Cuba.
I mean, come on.
He might be leading Canada, his family, but that's different.
So, the nature of the thing is you need to have, and what did they call it in Russia?
They called it Glasnost.
This is when perestroika, when Gorbachev gets in, it's a new openness.
I'm going to open things up.
And this is the thing that they're worried about here because the situation, the nature of the deep state that runs this country and the world, and soon space coming to a secret space program near you.
Is that they can't operate in the world of ideas and the marketplace of ideas in a free and open society.
They need to operate behind a wall of secrecy and maintain their advantages.
Look what we've seen in banking.
I mean, it just goes on and on.
Look what the Bankman Freed situation with FTX and all this nonsense and all the money laundering that took place there.
I mean, it's an endless cycle and we haven't improved.
There's still massive drug problems.
We've had 3 million people illegally enter.
This country in the last year, and people are completely blowing that off.
It's gigantically significant.
We don't know who those people are.
And the terrorist cells and all the nonsense and the things to let those people through could only suggest that you need that border open for drug purposes.
And so this is the nature.
I don't think that these problems are unsolvable, but we can't perpetually have them with no.
Fix in sight, which is why we need to get the current leadership out.
And opening these stories up, opening this piece up, goes to the heart of the authority of the intelligence communities over the public and the globe.
And if they're getting us into wars in Ukraine, maybe the fact that they assassinated the president 60 years ago opens up their kind of genesis of madness and gives us an edge to dismantle it.
Because going the track the way that it's going.
Is not going to resolve itself.
It's going to take people on a different level of consciousness in relation to the governments.
And it's going to take the government.
I mean, they're starting to sense it now after the COVID op.
They've made all these trillions of dollars.
All the money's gone to the top, you know, and all the power's gone to the top and Elon and all that stuff.
So now you have this movement coming in, and the movement is we need to regain some of the public's trust.
How do we do it?
And so, you know, you have something flitty like the Twitter files, which is very superficial.
And I've accused the media establishment, even the media establishment that I think is good on the podcast side, or even stories that get done that are well done on a show like Tucker Carlson or Joe Rogan or whatever.
But it's low potency.
And this is the thing for 2023.
I'm going to do a special about this, which is high potency is the nature of how we can inform people on a deep level.
And that's what we're aiming to do with this program.
Low potency makes things into entertainment categories.
So, if UFOs are entertainment or Atlantis is entertainment, you don't get anywhere.
And those people feel great about themselves saying, hey, I talk about these things, you know, like I'm open minded and all the rest, but you're not giving people the deeper piece.
When you interview people about the UFO piece, you're inviting CIA people on.
It's propaganda agents.
It's a totally different thing.
So there has to be a correction there and that, you know, it's a step in the right direction to have people talking about, you know, the COVID op and the nature of it.
But again, there, you have a lot of limited hangout things that are.
Hanging out there in the middle and not calling it for what it is.
How did all that happen?
You know, what are the forces involved?
Doesn't that get us to the next piece of this?
Ukraine, COVID, the UFO threat, you know, the financial scandals.
It's all adding up to the same thing, which is the people on the ground are getting propagandized, getting fleeced, and they're being held in a kind of, you know, Netflix continuum and they're not.
On the ground, you know, calling out the government.
So there's going to have to be a change here.
And 2023 is a really good opportunity, I think, because you're before, you're just previous to an election year when it's all going to be like all the marbles in the air.
And let's not forget the Mar a Lago raid, which is a disgrace, which is the kind of thing that happens in a banana republic, where someone in the White House goes after his enemy, you know, with his security forces.
Well, you know, I mean, that might as well be North Korea.
So, this is significant, I think.
And what we're coming into are answers because things can't go along like that, even on the level of those billionaires, on the Musk level, when they're like, we're bringing transparency with Twitter files and things like that.
I mean, even they realize that they have to look like that.
I don't think that those releases are particularly significant, frankly.
And I don't think they get to the core of the nature.
You know, of the problem, the way they're pretending.
This is an interesting masquerade with Twitter, but it's still an acknowledgement by that system that they can't go on in this psychotic fashion, that they've lost too much support, that they need to get some of it back.
And I've always said that there are divisions deep in that structure.
One of them is embarrassed by the actions of the other and to a level where they will completely turn against them.
And the other is just completely off the hook and says, I, you know, we don't need to be polite.
We're just going to go in and say, you know, your kids are going to be our sex slave and you're going to be a transhumanist slave with a chip in your brain.
I mean, you know, it's the way it's rolled out to culture, you know.
So this is where I think Huxley's Brave New World is a good kind of primer.
Yes.
Najat Madhri, if Trump was afraid to release the JFK files and he was POTUS, what makes DJ think McCarthy will do it?
And no rush, says DJ.
Would the release implicate every president of the United States since?
Well, there's no question that every president has had the ability to look at the records.
And, you know, this is interesting.
What it is is the history of an agency out of control.
So there may be forces that are deep in there that want those records to come out as a way of getting some equilibrium back with the Central Intelligence Agency.
The nature of the idea that if we're looking at the CIA and what they were able to do to blackmail these presidents to keep themselves in power, you know, this is a hard thing for the culture to deal with as a whole.
But I think there could be a movement.
The reason that I think it might be important with McCarthy is that McCarthy might have some incentive here to be the transparency guy.
And there's a possibility with this wave that's come about.
Only recently.
And as I said, some of it in relation to information that wasn't even true about files coming out that didn't.
But some of that interest and that, you know, the wind at their backs, a lot of the JFK researchers have said there seems to have been a sea change in the media in this overnight.
What is the nature of that?
In my opinion, it's the same co opting nature because that's what the media does.
That's what the intelligence agencies do.
They co opt these things.
They're not honest.
However, There could be an opportunity in the middle of all that.
And that's why I think the McCarthy thing is worth it.
If you read my letter to him, it lays it out on the line and everything is in there.
You know, the UFO file part is in there too.
But like I said, you know, he shouldn't think that's too far out.
I mean, in his own Congress, they were doing hearings on UFOs last summer.
So, you know, why not go for the gusto, McCarthy?
Yes.
Brad Briggs.
L. Fletcher Proudy makes the point that normally the Dallas police would investigate a murder.
The local DA would prosecute the case.
That never happened.
What if someone brought that case?
Yeah.
Well, the case and all the evidence was turned over to the FBI.
And the assassination in the police is still an open, unsolved case.
So, you know, that's pretty interesting.
I think it would be hard.
You know, the nature of the thing has been so covered up, and the researchers have brought so much of it out remarkably, and they've done a great job doing it.
On the federal level, I think that if the pressure, the pressure should be there on the CIA files because of the nature of what the CIA has done.
And the idea that there must be some mechanism that remained inside of those files, which is why Trump.
Said this to Napolitano that what's in there couldn't come out.
So, if there is something particularly damning in there, it probably relates directly to not only the assassination, but the UFO file aspect.
So, those two, I think, together, because otherwise, I think that people have been grappling with the idea that the CIA killed President Kennedy since the 1960s.
So, that's a generational thing.
Our grandparents had to think that.
And they passed that down to their children.
There's an interesting thing.
But once we learn the truth and once we bring the truth forward, we bring it forward for all those people, even those people that have died under that sort of false narrative.
It's sort of like a great move for humanity.
But more importantly, what's interesting in terms of American history, if you were looking at it logically, if this was a normal situation, it would be very easy to release those records because you'd say, oh, this whole thing happened 60 years ago and it's part of the history of the thing that happened.
The nature of why they are coveting those records to this degree shows complicity again in the assassination.
This is why you need the ability for a committee to force the records out.
Yes.
I want to ask this question.
Mike A says, I just can't understand how JFK went along with the lack of security that day in November.
He had to know they were after him.
In fact, there was an attempted assassination plot in Florida earlier and Chicago.
Yeah.
And it's pretty interesting because Joe and Ittys operates out of Miami.
And there was a plot in Miami.
He would have been aware of it.
They had an informant, according to Abraham Bolden, who was one of the first African American Secret Service agents who got set up in a bribery thing shortly after he called out the Warren Commission and then was recently pardoned under a presidential act after all these years.
But interestingly enough, he said that they were able to foil that situation in Chicago.
And remember, Chicago has that overlay of ruby and that whole piece.
But they were able to foil that in Chicago, and they had set up someone who was identical to Oswald, ex Marine, you know, supposed to be a loose cannon.
And he was found with all these weapons.
But the thing was, he was caught at a traffic light because he was driving erratically.
So he wasn't caught for any normal reason.
And when they pulled him over, they were like, What's going on here?
And they checked his trunk, and he had all these weapons in there.
That's how they got Thomas Valley, who was the Chicago Oswald.
But there was a group associated with Valley that was staying in a motel that was close to where the president was going to be.
And they got information, according to Bolden, from someone named Lee.
Think about where this goes.
So when you think about the CIA and the role of Lee Harvey Oswald, they could have been putting him in the middle of these assassination rings and being like, yeah, get that information for us on this and that.
And it could be that the information that we got.
For the CIA and the FBI that came back to the Secret Service, that got made President Kennedy say, Well, I have a cold.
I'm not going to Chicago.
I have to leave.
And they canceled that motorcade.
That may have saved Kennedy's life there in Chicago, but was it this informant?
Was the informant Lee Harvey Oswald?
I mean, the fact that his name was Lee, I think, is kind of interesting.
Yes.
Gina Boric, could you discuss the memo, the Lancer memo about MJ 12?
Yeah, I think the early original MJ12 documents were sent out and caused an earthquake.
And they came actually to Stanton Friedman, who was an excellent UFO researcher, passed away a couple of years ago.
But I had a number of conversations with him about MJ12, and he felt that what had happened was everyone associated with MJ12 had passed away.
And when he tracked down the dates, He was in receipt of these MJ12 UFO documents literally a month after the last person had passed away.
So, everyone associated with it had died, and therefore, someone who had it wanted to get it out.
Now, later, there was a lot of monkey business with different MJ12 releases and all the rest.
So, they became harder and harder to trust.
By the time you get to the burn memo, you know, that's the one that says, you know, We may have to assassinate Lancer, basically.
Isn't that something like the weather should be wet or something?
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
And wet work being assassination work.
I think the burn memo is very interesting.
Even if it is a copy or if it is something that was construed as a composite sketch, it captures the nature of what was going on and it puts the theme there very precisely.
And somebody, again, who was involved in that MJ machine wanted to put that out saying, Kennedy and the UFO file.
Keep looking at this.
Buying Back Executive Control of UFOs00:08:38
Kennedy and the UFO file.
And if you go deep on that track, a lot of it opens up.
Because Kennedy had the background on the UFO file because of Forrestal and because of his influences.
So, therefore, having that information in the background, remember, Forrestal is one of the earliest people who accessed the UFO file.
So he's very close with Kennedy.
They're both Catholics.
He takes Kennedy to post war Berlin when Kennedy is a journalist, even before he's a congressman.
So, you know, it's very interesting when you look at the influences of JFK by the time he gets to that conversation with Eisenhower, where Eisenhower says, you know, they've run away with the UFO file.
You have to find a way to bring that back under the executive umbrella.
And you could look at the three years of the Kennedy presidency as trying to rein in the Central Intelligence Agency and move that UFO file back under the executive wing.
I don't think.
That it comes back under the executive wing until Trump does the Space Force, which is the strange splintered attempt that happens while this weird, you know, TTSA, CIA driven false UFO UAP thing happens.
That's the significant fork in the road, in my opinion.
And somehow the Space Force piece is directly related to regaining the UFO file.
We have to remember.
As much as there's so much that goes on around Trump that makes this confusing, John Trump, Trump's uncle, bring it back.
We did an episode on him four years ago now Tesla, Trump, and the Time Capsule.
And it's the top episode of the X series.
But here's what's interesting about it Not only is John Trump very knowledgeable about X technology and the UFO file, but his mentor is Vannevar Bush at MIT.
That crisscross gives Trump an entree into that world.
The other entree into that world is Roy Cohn, who shows up in the Torbitt document around the whole aerospace piece.
Those two threads give Trump a tremendous advantage so that far from being just a loudmouth real estate guy who gets a lucky shot at the presidency, he's coming in there and they have to get him out because he's operating on the same level of knowledge in relation to the UFO file.
That's very dangerous for them.
That's why you see, in my opinion, High stakes raids on Trump at Mar a Lago and things like that.
He cannot be allowed to be in that position, regardless what you think of Trump politics up or down.
You might be a big supporter or somebody who thinks he's part of that establishment or he's a fascist, you know, whatever different things have different ideas.
You know, there's so many different ideas about Trump, but really, when you get right down to it, if he comes in with the money and knowledge of the UFO file and the X technology, that's a very big problem.
And there are a lot of rumors.
We heard the Napolitano thing tonight, but there's a lot of rumors that he came up against this idea of I'm going to release the JFK files.
The other thing was he was going to put the UFO file out there.
It didn't happen.
However, you know, he's kind of a loose cannon.
He has all that knowledge and he's seen these files.
So Trump is a huge, a huge red flag for that establishment.
They're very worried about him, even in the situation he is in right now, out of power, planning to run for president.
You know, They're very concerned.
Everything has to be done to keep him out of office.
That's quite telling.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show, deep, deep tonight on this special JFK report.
I think we got to most of it the Tunheim piece.
We got to the whole thing about Morley.
We got to the whole thing about the records release.
We got to the whole thing about the stuttering records, where the first version of that media story was all these Oswald JFK records came out.
And at the top of the hour, the beginning of the show, I read.
My letter to incoming Speaker McCarthy and my suggestion that he set up a House assassination committee and to get the records from the CIA and to put people under oath.
And some of those answers that they could get about the hidden records, which it's pretty well assumed that Joe and Nitty's records are the main ones that they're hanging on to.
The Garrison is the other piece that they haven't released, and E. Howard Hunt's.
E. Howard Hunt, famously, the one who said that the UFO file was responsible.
For the Kennedy part, well, it's weird that they're holding his records then.
So we've got Joe Anniddies associated with aerospace and the UFO file through Inman.
We have E. Howard Hunt associated with the UFO file through his confession to Caddy.
And we have the Jim Garrison records, which he also ran into this fact of hey, why is NASA in the middle of all this assassination?
So it's all aerospace when you get to what they're holding back.
Think about that.
Let that sink in.
And then think about the situation we're in where.
You know, they're trying to build a biometric society and control everything from this infrastructure in space.
By the way, we haven't gone back to the moon in 50 years, right?
It's kind of weird, isn't it?
And they're planning to do it now.
And now they have, you know, the SpaceX president, and he's kind of an unelected figure that everyone's going to, and he's dishing out democracy on Twitter.
I mean, the situation is getting pretty weird.
And I think from this perspective, we really need a new lens going into 2023 that says we're not buying it from the establishment.
We're not buying the COVID op.
We're not buying the UFO threat op.
And we're not buying the transhumanist reality that they're building up towards.
And I think right here in the ideas room, these are the nature of the conversations that they don't want to see happening.
Remember, what, a year and a half ago when they were like, don't stand within, I think it was a year ago, still, don't stand within six feet of each other.
That is very telling.
It's one of the most telling things in the whole.
Operation, in my opinion.
Yes.
Najat Madhri.
Was that RFK Jr.'s first public accusation of his uncle's murder?
Was it done by the CIA?
That's a big deal, him doing that.
He did it in my interview with him.
He talks all about his uncle's assassination and his dad's assassination also.
And, you know, the thing is, Robert Kennedy was assassinated by the CIA as well.
That's the other thing, which is there's a war that's taken place there.
Where's the history on that?
You know, we've had enough.
With the historians being like, hey, you know, that JFK was a prankster, and, you know, oh, the girls loved him, had a lot of relationships.
I mean, can you, how about this guy brought in a world changing, futuristic version of how things could be and enjoyed freedom, you know, wanted to promote freedom and wanted us to go into space and all these other things.
And there was this other group that had other plans for humanity and they went to war with this other group and they killed them, right?
That's how really how the 60s went.
So let's become experts on that and forget about the, you know, hey, you know, he really loved those.
Parties by the pool.
I mean, there's only so interesting that stuff can be.
They do this with Epstein too.
It misses a lot of the point for me, you know, which is that stuff's important, understanding it as an aspect.
But to just get people trapped in thinking about, oh, you know, let's read this thing about how so and so had an orgy coven, you know, it doesn't.
What really is crucial is maybe in that thread is how they use those situations to manipulate policy.
So, that for me becomes very important.
Manipulating Policy Through Situations00:02:27
Yes.
Actually, can you go to something else for a minute?
Sure.
Okay.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
We're probably going to wrap everything up here with a special report on the JFK records.
Absolutely fascinating and changing almost by the day.
I'm shocked with the way that this situation is moving here.
And for me, I think it's an opportunity for incoming Speaker McCarthy to.
There should be a push around this committee.
And I think that this is something that at least it should be out there as a major point.
Because having these little stories, these reports come out like, hey, Fox News finally said the CIA did it, that doesn't really help move the society, unfortunately.
I'll take it as if it's a canary in a coal mine, that's different.
But we need something that's very high potency.
Real truth, not a little hangout entertainment, you know, flash on the screen.
And I think we need a better dialogue and more serious dialogue around these things going into the new year.
That's what we're going to get.
And we're going to go into that new year with all of you in the ideas room.
And I actually feel like there are tremendous opportunities coming up with this year because of the things we've seen.
Because right after the election, the FTX scandal.
And that whole thing unraveled, and we can see the hollow structure that they were building there.
And that allows us to see the op that they're setting up around the central bank digital currency.
So, we're going to have fantastic guests coming up for you in 2023 around this and just amazing shows.
And of course, we're coming back with the X Series the first Friday in January, and we're going to have some very important reports coming up.
You know, between now and the new year, we'll still be doing special reports.
But the show, you know, the series itself coming back first Friday.
And that's an incredible lineup of shows.
I can't wait to get to some of that.
Of course, incredible guests.
Gigi Young will be coming back, Dr. Farrell and RFK Jr.
Everyone, you know, that lineup for January and February is a mind blower.
Demanding the Full Truth Now00:06:44
And we've had some really good interviews lately.
And with that, Miss Olivia, I think we're probably going to wrap it up.
Okay.
I have a lot of super chatters to thank.
Yes.
Gillenjoy R., Kim Woodrum, David Baker, Brian Storm, Catherine Rorden, PJ Doe, Old Magic Chest, Chris Joseph, Chris Beatty, Raymond Lee Harvey, Master Poe,
Doreen Hewitt, Sun Hero, John F., Erica Swenson Elliott, Mac Hike 57, Buster Blue Sun, WC Ray, Sandy Peters, State Wench 2, Atlantis is Found, Into the Quantum, Izzy the Great, Norman Smith, Bo Krills, Mike Green Tea, Tom Kefaber, Robert Scott, Finding Peyote, Robert Mearns, Wait a Minute 72, Bob Bindert, and we just got one, Neurosurgery Highland.
Thank you so much for your generous super chats tonight.
Unbelievable.
That's really fantastic, and we appreciate your support.
It helps us to be able to do the incredible reports that we want to do for you, and having you behind us makes all the difference.
And going into the new year, it really helps us to have that.
You know, just get up and go to really do all these things because we have some remarkable things for you.
I'm going to read a quote on the end here from David Talbot.
And he wrote a very interesting book called The Devil's Chessboard, all about Alan Dulles, which I think is quite remarkable.
And what he says, which I think is good in this rambling rant on Facebook, he says, The liberal media routinely Ridicules conspiracy theorists, and because the media doesn't do its job of thoroughly investigating power in America, the press has encouraged the growth of the most far out conspiracy mongering.
But some of these conspiracy theories are demonstrably true.
That's the way power prefers to operate in secret.
Yes, Virginia, the Johnson administration and the mainstream media hoodwinked the American people into the Gulf of Tonkin incident that led to the tragic escalation of the Vietnam War.
Yes, the Nixon administration lied about a secret assault on the Constitution that led to Watergate.
Yes, the Reagan administration covered up its secret dealings with Iran and the Contras.
Yes, the George W. Bush administration lied about WMD, a lie that paved the way for the disastrous Iraq war.
Don't forget about the Clinton lies in there.
This is the problem sometimes.
The list goes on and on.
Government agencies and corporations lie to us all the time.
They cover up, they conspire.
If it weren't for a few brave journalists and congressional investigators, we'd know next to nothing about how power in this country really operates.
So, yes, it's time to demand the full truth.
About the JFK assassination.
I couldn't agree more.
And that's what we're doing here with the letter to McCarthy, which I hope he responds to.
There's a fantastic opportunity there.
And everyone, I'm going to do some shout outs for you because I want you to have a great, great holiday.
Who have we got there?
Kevin Kelso.
Thank you, sir.
That is a great super sticker, indeed.
Bo Krills, it's great to see you out there.
Planet gone nuts.
I can appreciate it, but just wait.
It's actually planets gone nuts because they've done a lot more out in space and they've let us know.
Good Witchy.
Merry Christmas to all.
Indeed.
Yes.
Chuck Bam.
Wow.
Tim Houston.
The gang's all here.
Thanks, DJ and Olivia.
I know Wednesday night.
Well, you know, this is interesting.
It was kind of the timing was just too perfect after all.
Alan Dulles.
Indeed.
Tracker 001.
Renee Newt, important book to read.
That's the devil's chessboard.
I agree 100%.
Yeah, what do you got?
I just wanted to say we don't do pay for play.
Pay for play.
Pay for play.
So if you.
What is this, a radio station?
Well, if you do a super chat and you ask a question, a lot of channels may ask that question.
We don't do that.
We don't make that a necessity of asking questions.
I will just ask DJ questions that are good, that seem to go with the flow of the conversation.
So I'm letting everyone know that because there's someone that happens to be frustrated in the ideas room.
And that is how we roll because we don't make donations necessary.
To have a short order cook one says, Thank you, DJ and Olivia, and have a wonderful Christmas.
But I agree with you.
And remember, you know, the ideas room, Olivia rules.
She is, she knows how to run the place.
It's not about money.
Um, Najat, Merry Christmas, dear X fam.
Indeed, Merry Christmas to all.
And uh, Merry Christmas again, Florian Gayer.
Great to see you, fantastic Karen Carpenter.
I know Kate's out there.
It's great to see you.
Golden Girl, the term conspiracy theorist was coined by the CIA, and Jim Morrison's dad was the commander of the ship in the Gulf of Tonkin, the story to start the war.
That's true.
I actually, it's interesting too.
Mae Brussels did an interesting thing about Jim Morrison, and it's funny because she actually thinks of them as being more manipulated, you know, as opposed to the celebrities of that era being themselves, you know, compromised in some level.
That they're actually kind of thrown to the wolves once they turn against the machine.
It's very interesting.
I sent some of that myself.
I get a little piece of that.
Thank you, DJ and Olivia.
Great show.
Hope all who see this video have a wonderful weekend.
I'm going to be putting the whole letter to McCarthy up on Facebook.
I'll put the PDF out there as well.
And he's got his copy.
He can read it by tomorrow.
Let's hope he does something with it.
But in any case, I'll make sure that it's accessible and we'll have a link there for it.
DJ certainly knows heaps.
Thanks, Wings Girl and Chatters.
Have an awesome day or night wherever you are on this crazy earth.
Thank you, Stephen.
I appreciate it.
It sounds like you know a lot, too.
Yes.
Let's see.
Great work, DJ.
Thank you.
Have a great holiday.
We know Miss Olivia is big on a lot of things.
Can I throw you, like, okay, I'd like to end on a different note.
Autopsy Secrets and Banned Stories00:06:02
So, Claes says, serious question regarding Oswald.
Since in last show you guys mentioned he wasn't in his grave, did he actually get killed?
Is there anything sure about this?
Just a Thought.
So, what's the deal with Oswald's corpse?
You could do a whole show on that.
All you can say is that Paul Groody, who did the original burial, said that they did an autopsy on his head and that when they dug him up, the person that they dug up didn't have an autopsy.
So, you know, there's a lot of weirdness with all that.
There's a reason why they dug up that body.
There were a lot of questions.
About what was happening there.
Two Oswalds, there are people who came forward and said, Well, you know, I grew up with Oswald in North Dakota.
We know that there's time spent in New York, New York City, New York City, New Orleans, Texas, and then he seems to be attending schools at the same time in different states.
There's definitely an early job of portraying him as two people.
The reasons for it, very unusual.
The other unusual thing about him is that he speaks such good Russian that when he meets Marina, she thinks he's a Russian.
How good did his Russian have to be for him to be able to go over to a foreign country and for Marina to think he's a native speaker?
Wow, this guy is a lot different than anything we've been told about him.
And that should be part of the official story, too.
The story, the way that we have it out there of Oswald, is this disgruntled guy in the Texas School Book Depository who just couldn't wait for a chance to assassinate the.
I mean, it's really incredibly.
Weak story, but I think it's manipulated from a very early age and set up.
There were two Oswalds.
I agree.
I agree.
There's multiple people.
Well, J. Edgar Hoover in 1960 wrote a memo agreeing exactly with what you just said.
So think about that.
That's three years before the assassination.
Maybe some big things are coming out here.
Maybe someone in that structure knows, which is why.
We got this weird sort of false start.
Could well be.
Esoteric Gold, Moments Divine.
Yep, they've been lying.
Says, be borrowed.
Bo Krills.
Love the ideas room.
Yes, sir.
Black Zionists.
Type in Harvey and Lee.
That's a very interesting story.
Tricky Vicky.
He went to Mexico and Russia too.
Yeah, this is what you notice about these lone nut figures, right?
They somehow travel the world and seem to have unlimited expense accounts.
And, you know, Oswald stayed in five star hotels when he traveled.
It's like, where did this guy get all this money?
Mark David Chapman famously had Dali paintings.
And, you know, he went all over the world too.
He was in Asia, he was in the Middle East, and supposedly he was working for $4.25 a security guard, $4.25 an hour.
There's something wrong with that story.
But, you know, Mark David Chapman's still alive.
You know, make a case that he should be examined for MKUltra programming in relation to the assassination of John Lennon.
We did an episode featuring that last month, and it's all about Lennon in the Hall of Records and the Egyptian fascination that he had.
But that's in there, and I highly recommend it.
Tippett knew Ruby for years.
Right.
Yeah.
Tippett's another very unusual piece in all this.
And just the fact that he's.
The chosen one to be sacrificed.
And remember, the only crime that Oswald got charged with when they grabbed him was shooting Tippett.
He wasn't charged with shooting Kennedy until many, many hours later.
Yes.
So people might have a little time over the holidays to watch some things other than the Dark Journalist show.
So the men who killed Kennedy, there were three banned chapters, right?
Yeah, those are hard to get.
Well, I think they're on YouTube, aren't they?
I don't know if all of them are.
That's a good question.
What is the name of the one with the family, with the guy who was the.
Superb reporting and insight.
Thank you, DJ and Olivia from Flore.
Yes.
So there's.
Oh, yeah.
That is interesting.
The Smoking Guns.
Yes.
Fantastic.
And it's all about this very interesting gentleman who was known for his kind of funeral home work in how to sculpt the body and make it look just right.
And he had unusual skills in that department.
And he.
Was somebody that they called out to Bethesda to dress and change the wounds of President Kennedy.
That's a very, that's an incredible episode.
And The Guilty Men is the other one.
This is like a must watch if you want to understand the Kennedy assassination.
Well, an incredible British director there who brought this forward and really had to go underground for a while because of that.
And he was ahead of everyone.
He got sued by Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, the History Channel, Lady Bird Johnson.
Lady Bird, well, her estate.
She was dead, I believe.
But that, yeah, wow.
But he brought a heck of a lot home.
Stephen, very interesting.
Thank you.
Those weren't banned.
Yes, they were.
They were banned off the History Channel.
They were shown once, and then it was very hard to get them.
Bill Ferry, there he is.
Next Week's Archetypal Reports00:02:08
It's great to see you out there.
Charlotte K., Karen Carpenter, James M., Sam Squatch.
Hi from Australia.
That gets the nod at the end.
We will see you all.
We'll have some special reports between now and New Year's.
For sure.
And then we'll be back with the X series the first Friday in January.
And it's a whopper.
Don't miss it.
Exciting stuff coming up next month for you.
And we'll keep a close eye on all these JFK records.
And hopefully, if anything comes back on that McCarthy letter, we'll let you know first.
And so have a great weekend, everybody.
Remember, if you're new here and you haven't yet, sign up for the newsletter at darkjournalist.com.
It's a free newsletter, it keeps us in touch.
We're able to get around the censorship that way.
And if you feel like it, supporting the program, get behind the work that we do and subscribe.
We've tried to make it very affordable for you.
We will see you all next week.
And we have some surprises for you coming up late December, early in January.
And I am going to give the final word to Christine Laurel, who said, Now that it's the solstice, the light will be returning soon.
Every minute counts.
Isn't that the truth?
Solstice is fantastic.
And it's always a time for celebration.
Of course, that close to Christmas.
And they're linked in this kind of symbolic and archetypal way, if you think about it.
You know, here comes the sun after all.
We will see you all next week.
Have a great evening, everyone, and a fantastic holiday and just a wonderful Christmas.
Right.
Happy holidays.
Merry Christmas.
Happy New Year.
Merry Christmas.
And God bless.
And, you know, it says end broadcast, but after all, The holiday never really ends, right?