Dark Journalist X-120: Coup to Coup: COG CIA Wars features Libby and Olivia alleging the Biden administration, alongside figures like Christia Freeland and Justin Trudeau, orchestrates a globalist deep state coup via Ukraine. They claim false narratives regarding Russia trigger Continuity of Government (COG) protocols, enabling asset freezes and constitutional suspensions under DHS/CISA control. The discussion links Watergate-era CIA surveillance to modern drone strikes by John Brennan, cites the Voronezh UFO incident as a potential psyop, and critiques Hollywood's role in suppressing constitutional freedoms while advocating for strict border defense against alleged intelligence smuggling. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Emergency Powers Surge00:08:15
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalists.
What a fantastic crowd we have out there in the ideas room already.
Of course, I'm joined tonight by the lovely Olivia.
Hi, everybody.
And Olivia storms all around.
Indeed.
And of course, storms also in Eastern Europe.
Of course, we all know that there's a state of war going on, and that really comes a lot into what I was going to do for this episode, which is all about the continuity of government program and the coups that have got us into this position.
And one of the things we're going to be looking at tonight is how these things overlay with each other and how so much of what's happening in Ukraine, how terrible it is.
But it plays into this globalist deep state plan.
And we're going to see exactly how they're looking to pull this off and how the kind of warfare that they're engaged in is coming from several different varieties.
But of course, the Emergency Powers Act that we discussed last week.
And the big pharma takeover that we've been in the middle of.
This is all basically part of the same arrangement.
And to see these pieces move together along with the digitizing of your wallet and then the consolidation of your political opinion to be put into this little cube over here.
And this is basically what we need to get at for tonight because it's so crucial for us to understand we are looking at a system, a global system coming down to control where you go.
What you do, who you do it with.
Everyone says your sound is off.
Oh, interesting.
That it is very low.
Some people say there's an echo.
Hmm, that's really interesting.
How is my sound, everybody?
Yeah, well, I'll tell you, that's pretty wild because in the old settings here, it looks like it's on and it's good.
So, oh, you know, let's do this.
How does that crap?
Yeah.
Okay, that should be good.
Yeah, I think that'll do it.
Okay.
Yes, thanks for the heads up.
So far, so good.
I could start again.
Do you want me to start again?
Well, everybody says it's better.
So we'll stick with that.
Whoa.
Okay.
Fantastic.
All right, everyone.
So here we are deep, deep now into this Ukrainian crisis that has been hoisted upon us as the result of the policies of Stepford Biden and the large group of European nations who.
Made a very cagey arrangement there in the Ukraine.
And we had, of course, the actions of President Putin and Putin's incredible reaction to this bombing his neighbor there is unbelievable.
But I would also say that this has been maneuvered into position in many ways.
And we also have to look beyond it.
But of course, the people on the ground can't.
So we're going to get to that as well tonight.
But I want to see what it is.
That's going on in the background.
And when we look at this, we have to keep in mind that the surge that's been going on for the past couple of years is based all around emergency powers.
And this is where we find ourselves.
We're in the domain of emergency powers.
And the way that emergency powers work, especially in the 21st century, is although many of them were devised even earlier, basically, you take a very small portion of the electorate that supports something 20, 30%.
You know, somebody like Trudeau, for example, who used the Emergencies Act, is incredibly unpopular in his own country.
And the way they do things there through the parliament allows him to be incredibly unpopular and still get in and to be the prime minister.
Now, and in our case with Stepford Biden, I mean, it was very clear that he lost the election and there was all kinds of chicanery involved there.
And as we're looking at him now, sitting at about 28% approval, that's through Democratic pollsters.
You can only imagine the real number is basically, you know, 20, maybe 20% max.
And part of the reason is because we've had this incredible surge at our own borders.
We've had incredible foreign policy flops, like giving the Taliban $100 billion in equipment as we ran out of there in a sight worse than Vietnam.
And then you have the incredible mandates and the destruction of small business, along with a number of large scale spending that's been going on in relation to Biden and his administration.
What we need to do is look beyond and see who's.
Pulling those strings there.
And so when you have the emergency powers working for you, all those bad things go away.
You know, if you're dealing with 10% inflation and your numbers are down and people can't find work, then, you know, what you do is you say, well, you know, I have these emergency powers.
I can rifle through anything I want.
So it gives them the ability to do this.
Now, war is an emergency condition.
And the thing that I believe that we're going to see them building up to, and it's something we've talked about here on the X series often, is Cyber attack as grounds for a blackout, especially an internet blackout.
Now, I think that there's been a lot of song and dance and fear porn along these lines.
I've always used the exact terms that the government uses in relation to how they would shut things down so that we can avoid just using too much fantasy involved in it.
However, it is a very real possibility.
And today, They have now put up this whole program, which is designed to prepare infrastructure for a Russian cyber attack, as if it was already happening.
And you might say, well, you know, because of all the tensions, et cetera.
But the press campaign behind it is just off the charts.
And they've been pushing this for a while.
Of course, past the big pharma takeover, and, you know, we're going to track your actions, and here's this app so we can track you whenever you're with the wrong person, and these types of things.
There's the big push for the digital wallet and the digital ID.
And this is basically a way to track the citizens and control them.
There's just no getting around it.
When we had Catherine Austin Fitz on last week, we were talking all about, you know, if you want to go to a particular place, if you want to drive in a certain radius, they'll keep you locked in if you're, you know, a dissident or if you said something bad about the government.
So they want that kind of power and that kind of authority.
We saw in Canada the ruthless taking down of the trucker protest and then the stalking.
Of those individuals taking part in the protest and the seizing of their bank accounts, et cetera.
Those types of powers being asked for were extraordinary.
And of course, they lifted the state of emergency because it was too unpopular.
And our boy Justin would have gone down a little too hard for his own good.
But it was still a disgrace.
I mean, come on, you know, we're looking at it.
And I have to say, when we get into the Canadian aspect of this, they were kind of the.
Test module for what they could do with this.
So they put the emergency powers on for three days.
And by the time those three days were over, it was already, you know, they had done so many illegal things because those emergency powers gave them the ability to, you know, warrantless wiretap and all these types of things, track and freeze assets online of citizens who just didn't agree with them.
So completely absurd powers being placed in the hands of a few.
And of course, Canada is still under this system, even though the emergency part was lifted.
Regulating Bitcoin Chaos00:15:25
It was never supposed to be there in the first place.
This was Trudeau and Freeland.
And Freeland, she's very interesting.
And I did a portion of the last episode on her because we're looking at somebody there who is not only the deputy prime minister, but is also the finance minister.
So Trudeau created this office for her.
And we need to keep that in mind, too.
Whenever you see people branching out, it reminds me very often of how Hitler merged president and chancellor to become the ultimate dictator in Germany way back when.
Positions, changing positions, you know.
Henry Kissinger's position under Richard Nixon had never been thought of.
Nixon invented it to get around the State Department.
Eventually, Kissinger would help take him down.
And Nixon comes up tonight, interestingly enough, because this situation that we're looking at calls into mind a number of parallels in our own history.
And Nixon certainly was right in the bullseye of the center of a continuity of government overthrow.
And that was in 1974.
And we're going to discuss.
The people involved from the CIA who were involved with that.
Those coups, and I call this coup to coup, and I guess the subtle title would have been 63 to 2022.
It's because this group that operates through the continuity of government emergency powers structure, which is massive and trillions of dollars a year, which there's no oversight for, because you can't have oversight for a program like this because it's too secret.
So when you bring those people in, you just say, oh, it concerns continuity of government, it's too secret, you don't have the access.
And that's it.
One of the things that Nick Baggich told me in relation to this, and his dad was a senator, his brother a senator, that they'll have them go into a Senate intelligence hearing, the senators involved.
They won't be able to take a pen or paper in.
They'll have to listen like a six year old if someone gives them a lecture on something they don't know about and is withholding things, and you can't really question them.
And then that's it.
You walk out, and that's your briefing.
That's oversight.
So, you can see how that system could very easily evolve into a sub government, which is what we're looking at now.
And this is how we can get to the bottom of it.
And one of the things that's crucial, which is on the surface now, which wasn't on the surface even five years ago when I was discussing it with Professor Scott on this program, was the continuity of government program.
It just was not out there in the media, except in very scant references.
And if you had brought it up during a Senate hearing, they would have said, whoa, you know, you can't say that.
And that's happened a number of times, even during the Iran Contra hearings in the 80s, this happened.
So, why couldn't you talk about continuity of government?
Well, it's too secret.
It's too secret because it concerned the survivability of the government originally after nuclear war.
We're going to see it went a lot further than that and evolved under Rumsfeld and Cheney to become any emergency, which is what the emergency we're still living under since September 11th.
Believe it or not, we still live under those emergency rules right now.
So, I want to.
Since I mentioned this cyber attack aspect, though, I want to be out there in front of this so we're aware of it.
So, when they run the scare headlines and when they try to pull this off, I don't believe that Russia is going to attack our cyber infrastructure.
And I say that from a position, you know, I mean, there's a lot of hackers and there's a lot of security experts out there, but the kind of thing that they're talking about would bring a lot of blowback and it's not worth it for Russia to do something like that.
However, we have seen in the case of the government when they were trying to pin this whole thing on Trump about him and Putin and all that stuff.
Which never made any sense and there was never any evidence for, and they tried twice with impeachments and it didn't work.
That we were looking at a situation where they're willing to forge the footprints of the intelligence hacker coming in, and then they give it a phony footprint back to whatever enemy they want to call out Ukraine, Russia, China, whatever it is.
Very often, of course, they go back to Russia because they love China, this group that's in now the Stepford Biden administration.
Okay, CISA.
The Cyber Infrastructure Security Agency shields up warning Russian cyber attacks.
That's four hours ago.
They've just started in with this.
You can pretty easily, if you think about everything that's tied in, this is kind of like remember Y2K?
This was a big scare some 20 years ago, saying as soon as we go into the year 2000, everything is going to go crazy and telephone poles and traffic lights won't work and computers will all fry and you won't be able to.
Process things, you'll have to go back to an old cash register and everything else.
And they sold a lot of people on this.
Of course, none of it ever happened.
But I do think that they're willing to pull these things off.
And this is what we need to be aware of.
Emergency, what kind of emergency would that create?
People can't get at their banking, people can't get at records.
A number of things would be disrupted on such a scale that we'd be looking at a genuine emergency.
But if you could create that situation, then you could continue to rule by.
Emergency powers, which is the goal of this outfit.
Remember our friend, Christia Freeland, the deputy minister over there in Canada, who was really, really cozy with some Russian oligarchs back in the 90s, interestingly enough.
And she comes in from a very interesting deep state angle.
So, that's completely illegal normally, but because you have the ability to flip that emergency power switch, guess what?
Anything illegal is now legal.
That's pretty handy, eh, Libby?
So, anytime you have a political enemy, aha, their protest is an emergency.
Flick that switch, freeze their bank accounts, you're done.
What can you do?
So, that's why this whole thing about people saying, you know, I just want to have cyber money and all this stuff, and Bitcoin is freedom.
Apparently, that's not such a good system because they've been talking about how they can regulate it.
Biden came out and said, we're going to regulate it.
They came out and said, We're going to track those wallets.
So that's not the way to go.
However, useful it is for other things, it's not the way that it's been built as this kind of savior thing where people can just transact amongst themselves.
I always think it's fishy when people are transacting something that's not worth anything.
And you can say that about just the way they do the money circuit as well, just printing the money.
And there's no question about it.
But I think that we need the solution to be something about the integrity of the system.
That's what we need to build in because these things, among themselves, Bitcoin, and they're already going to push out Bitcoin anyway.
So, I shouldn't even be talking about it because Bitcoin has some genuinely good aspects.
But the other side of this, the CDBC, Central Bank Digital Currency, this is interesting because once they get to that point, they've already openly discussed, as we've shown in this program, the ability to just shut off that money and to have it work in their system the way they want it to.
So, that's the end of financial freedom and ultimately the end of your freedom as a citizen in a democracy.
So, they're already starting to use this Ukraine piece for their own advantage.
Okay, cybersecurity.
The next thing judge warns of U.S. divisions and cites Russia's attack on Ukraine while sentencing Capitol riot defendant.
J6, right?
So now we're going to say, aha, because of that Russian situation going on in the Ukraine, guess what?
You saying anything bad about the government now, you know, all we have to do is bring up the fact that Ukraine is at war with Russia and you suddenly are against the structure.
So, we have to kind of keep this in mind the mentality, the narratives that they've been building.
We can also be aware that they've known that this action by Putin has been coming for a while behind the scenes.
And how they had that knowledge is interesting and how they could predict it.
Of course, Putin came out in a televised address today.
I caught a few minutes of it, I didn't catch the whole thing, but he was comparing his action to our action in the Iraq war.
Both actions are completely faulty.
From a foreign policy perspective, but that's where the comparison ends.
One of the things I do want to say, though, about Putin is you know, that's not a good defense because to say, well, the United States did a big stupid thing, I can do it too.
You know, the people in Ukraine don't feel that way.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
This is X Series 120.
We are going coup to coup, and it is COG and CIA wars.
We're going to be taking your questions in the second half of the program tonight.
And Ms. Olivia is putting all that together.
You can ask those questions now.
We're going to try to get to as many of them as possible.
How's the temperature out there?
Very intense.
Do you want a question?
Sure.
Okay.
So this, I'm sure, will come up throughout the chat tonight.
Shasha Keela wants to know Is it possible Putin is getting rid of the Khazarian Mafia?
He's been bitching about it for years, but that is not broadcast here in the West.
Well, I don't see, I don't think the Khazarian Mafia has been.
In the alternative sector, really spelled out very well.
And I also see, you know, Putin, the member of his own mafias.
So I don't see him as the kind of guy who is really on the side of the people or anything like that.
I think he's just another force to be reckoned with.
I do see that he's not on board with a lot of what's been going on in the New World Order push of the globalists.
And they've left him out, in fact, at times, because He's done things that don't fit in, like refuse to have GMOs and have more of a traditionalist view.
The problem with the Putin is savior approach and why it doesn't work for me is Putin comes out of the KGB and he's a member of the World Economic Forum.
He's got all those connections there.
So some of the moves that he's made and some of the things that we turned him into such a boogeyman during the Trump presidency.
And it was all the Democrats could do.
The damage that that's done to our foreign policy and is largely responsible for this war that you're looking at now.
Because, in essence, what happened during that period is that they developed such a disrespect for Russia in dialogue, it was happening during the Biden Obama administration.
And then, Obama, Biden's just continuing that.
But it's interesting that none of this happened during the Trump administration.
Trump had a conciliatory tone toward Putin, but he was aware he also had sanctions on him and everything else.
So, you know, you have to look at this and clear out the political hacks who are guiding it.
So you can say, well, you know, I like this Democrat and they're against Putin or whatever.
That's not going to do it.
What you need to look at is what is the guiding structure that's making these things happen?
So, where's the war in Ukraine coming from, for example?
And a large part of it is the idea that we were going to put NATO right on Putin's doorstep.
So that created the tensions.
And then he felt he wasn't getting the security assurances, and he used it as an excuse to go in there and bomb that country.
And it's, you know, it's an indefensible war act, but it could have been there were ways to mitigate the situation.
Instead, now the military industrial complex is going to be feeding both sides.
They're going to be watching oil go through the roof.
All their dreams are coming true, and all that money is going to shoot up to the top while the people on the ground suffer and also.
The war conditions are created.
That's the real piece to look at in here.
And always, like, in looking at the states and the countries that are involved is one aspect.
But who is really making the money?
There's a famous book by Charles Hyam called Trading with the Enemy about all these companies who were making a tremendous profit during World War II, selling to the Nazis to build up the war machine.
The problem is they were American companies.
And this is the theme.
It's kind of the archetype for the thing we're going through now.
Yes.
Jack Jack says Putin is just.
Controlled opposition, his role for the globalist team, I don't think it's that simple.
I think people, everything I've seen, people really want to simplify this, right?
Because it is.
Oversimplify it.
Yeah.
And, you know, people can have one public role and one secret, covert role.
And it's just, you know, we're pretty helpless out here trying to figure out what's going on.
I mean, we have experts in intelligence and they don't agree all the time.
So, and it's a very uncomfortable position to not really understand.
What we're seeing, and what if what we're seeing is even real?
Yes, there is that whole dance, and there's the theater.
There's a lot of theatrics going on in relation to this.
The problem is the people on the ground suffer.
So, regardless of how good those theatrics are on top, the reality is they have to suffer on a day to day basis.
This is why we need to expose the system of how they do these things.
It's why we need to expose the pharma takeover that's been going on, the mandates, and all the incredible BS that they're backing off from now just because they realize they're getting exposed.
That is right, you know, lockstep, neck and neck with all this other corruption involved in what we're seeing here.
And, you know, if anything, the Biden administration is excited to change the subject because their poll numbers are terrible.
You know, they've had a disastrous record on the economy.
It's one of the worst starts for any administration.
We're over a year into this administration and nothing good has happened.
This guy is supposed to do a State of the Union on March 3rd, I think it is.
And I'd like to see Stepford Biden come out there and do that because it's a very pretty indefensible record.
And Biden can't really finish a sentence very well, anyway.
For me, it's unwatchable at this point.
It's tough.
It's tough.
And so there's that part of it.
And then they're sending Kamala Harris over there.
And that's a really bad face.
Also unwatchable.
Homeland Security Review00:11:04
Well, she doesn't know anything about foreign policy.
That's a problem.
And, you know, they should probably put her in some other part of the government because she certainly doesn't know anything about foreign policy.
Okay.
Here's the trend that I see.
Here's the emergency piece.
Here is the you need us, you're going to be in a blackout, and the Russians are coming.
Cybersecurity threat that they've been pushing out through the Department of Homeland Security, which got a whole bunch of new powers today.
I'm going to talk about our friends with a quarter of a million employees over there at the Department of Homeland Security.
Wow.
What do you do with 250,000 employees?
That's a lot of people for an agency that didn't even exist in 2001.
Think about that.
It was the September 11th attacks that created this machine, and now we're stuck with this thing.
And between that and the long established Central Intelligence Agency, which has been orchestrating so much of this, we are in an interesting spot because they're starting to control so much of the media and the entertainment that we see.
And so it's only this open communication that we have on the internet that is creating the proper contrast to throw out there.
Anti freedom policies.
The problem is they want to bring that internet down and rebuild it with all these safeguards in it so that you who speak the truth suddenly become disinformation people.
You're not allowed on that internet.
That's where they're headed.
And we're going to talk about how they get there and how we can stop them.
Everybody watching the X Series 120, this is Coup to Coup, COG, and CIA Wars.
Let's get into this.
I'm going to do a series of these articles.
Is the cyber war coming or is it already here?
This is Vox.
Russia's history of destructive cyber attacks in Ukraine is raising concerns about a cyber war in the future.
Okay, this is all from today.
This I found interesting.
Department of Homeland Security on February 3rd, about three weeks before all this happened, launches first ever cyber safety review board.
Now, you'd think for cyber security, they'd have had this review board right from the beginning, but no, they saved it until.
This February.
Today, the US Department of Homeland Security announced the establishment of the Cyber Safety Review Board, CSRB, as directed in President Biden's Executive Order 14028 on improving the nation's cybersecurity.
CSRB is an unprecedented public private initiative that will bring together government and industry leaders to elevate our nation's cybersecurity.
That's right.
Facebook will spy on you and put you on these government lists and then.
The government will be able to say, Aha, you said something against us.
Guess you don't get access to your bank account.
The Biden Harris administration has taken bold steps to meaningfully improve our cybersecurity resilience, said Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas.
At the president's direction, the Department of Homeland Security is establishing the Cyber Safety Review Board to thoroughly access past events, ask the hard questions, and drive improvement across public and private sectors.
Well, you're a public company, so you're not supposed to do anything in the private sector.
I look forward.
You know, that's a public government body.
What are you doing in the private sector?
Get out.
I look forward to reviewing the board's recommendations regarding how we can better protect communities across our country as the Department of Homeland Security works to build a secure digital future, blah, blah, blah.
All right, today, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency shields up, as I mentioned.
So now they have the shields up.
Three weeks after.
So they create this board, and now the board shields up.
Russia's unprovoked attack on Ukraine.
This is interesting, too, because this is political language inserted into a government website, which you'd think would be neutral and just say the activities of the war in Ukraine between Russia and, you know, Instead, it's Russia's unprovoked attack on Ukraine, which has been accompanied by cyber attacks on Ukrainian government and critical infrastructure organizations, may have consequences for our own nation's critical infrastructure, a potential we've been warning about for months.
Oh, for years, really.
While there are no specific credible cyber threats to the U.S. homeland, you mean the United States of America?
What is this homeland thing?
You mean because of homeland security?
Which, where did they get that name after all?
This is the weird thing.
Remember, the names are important also because the United States has a constitution.
And as a result of that constitution, that every political official swears to, we have a kind of central body of law in the land.
Now, if I just call it homeland, I can do whatever I want.
Hey, you're under emergency powers in your homeland, and we're going to create sectors where we have regional governors to mine the store.
That's what COG is all about.
So, they'll always use homeland.
They'll never just say the United States.
They can't do it.
CISA, along with our partners in the US intelligence community, the CIA, they're monitoring the threat environment 24 7 to discern whether those threats manifest themselves in risk to the US homeland.
There we go again.
Okay, the CIA was just caught collecting information on citizens illegally by two senators.
They've been doing this for years.
This is why, you know, whenever we get around to these conversations, we cover the UFO file extensively on this show, as you know.
When we get into these things and the CIA people come in and we're going to give you disclosure, look, they're spying illegally on U.S. citizens.
It's an illegal extra constitutional agency.
What part of this don't you understand?
You're not going to get the truth from groups like that.
Why do dummies in the UFO field start palling around with CIA people talking about disclosure?
It's absurd.
It's the most idiotic thing I've lived to see around the UFO field, which I've followed for years and years.
They're all cozy with CIA people, as we've pointed out in this program.
So there should be just a straight up policy.
Let's start there.
Start in that one narrow field and say, you know what?
We're not going to go for any CIA misinformation in that one field and let it spread out to all these other places because these guys have their fingers in too many pies.
So the problem with saying, hey, we're going to rely on the intelligence community to tell us when this emergency is incoming is they've been caught doing all these illegal things themselves.
So the idea of them creating a false emergency.
For purposes unknown, it is very high, wouldn't you say?
Actually, what should be happening is the Central Intelligence Agency should be being investigated on a case by case basis for all these violations.
That's more like it.
I actually have the story here, and I'm going to read it tonight, about their egregious cataloging of citizens' data, which they have nothing to do with.
And they got caught again.
They've done this for years.
All right, let's keep going with.
These headlines and the cyber threat, and the emergency powers that are going to be cited to justify it.
DHS designated as the lead federal agency to respond to Russia related impacts in the United States.
That is from yesterday.
So, the Department of Homeland Security now is in charge of all the cyber attack stuff in relation to our friends in Russia.
The president has designated the Department of Homeland Security to lead federal agencies to coordinate domestic preparedness and response efforts related to the current Russia Ukraine crisis.
The lead federal agency, DHS, has established a unified coordination group to ensure unity of effort across the federal government.
In preparing for and responding to possible threats to the homeland, not to the United States, to the homeland.
Develop and pursue strategic objectives and priorities, coordinate with federal, state, and local officials.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agencies Shields Up webpage provides information on how to improve their cybersecurity.
So you get the idea.
That one directly from a government website, the CISO website.
All right, here's some more.
Let's keep rolling with this.
CNBC.
The world is bracing for a global cyber war as Russia invades Ukraine.
So, they want this part.
This is what you know.
You might say that when you need to warn the public about something, there might be heightened tensions.
So, you know, we'll have an extra eye on this.
Instead, it's blaring headlines everywhere, which means they want everyone on board with it.
And then they'll say, Well, what can I do, you know, in order to stave off this cyber security threat?
And they'll say, Well, keep six feet apart from each other, wear a mask, spray your hands, you know, whatever it is to get you on board.
I'm sure they have a new version of this going on.
Okay.
In recent weeks, Ukraine has been hit with numerous cyber attacks targeting its government and banking system, and experts have blamed Russia.
So we don't know who's doing that, but it could very well be Russia since they went in there and bombed them, you know.
So it probably is.
The idea that a Russian hack would come over here is different.
The onslaught of attacks has led to fears of a wider digital conflict.
Researchers say a cyber war between Russia and the West is possible.
Okay, now an incident happened where Nvidia, who makes computer chips, were hacked yesterday.
And immediately the headline was unclear if Nvidia's cyber incident tied to Russia Ukraine.
So already anything that happens now that's in relation to a hacker is going to be because of the Russians in Ukraine.
So, this is what they've got out of this.
So, they might have said, All right, well, you know, it's bad strategic positioning for us that Russia can go in there and take out the leaders that we've installed there.
And we're not going to send troops in because we've tempted him to go do this.
But now we have the ultimate peace that we can use on our own population, which is anything that happens that we don't like, we can call it a Russian hack and slowly but surely boot those undesirables off the internet who have given us such a hard time.
This is where so much of this is going.
I've got more.
I've got more.
What Americans should do to prepare for Russian cyber attacks.
This is the Atlantic.
Already pushing this.
Poisoning the Atmosphere00:14:32
And, you know, like I said, you can imagine what their suggestions are going to be.
It's going to be some kind of weird process eventually where they're like, oh, so and so who expresses such and such an opinion, you know, if you're anywhere near their website, you might have problems.
They might actually, one of the interesting things that they described.
Early on, when Biden was looking to frustrate his domestic opponents, he wanted to create this domestic terrorism bill and get it through.
It's had a lot of ups and downs, and it's one of the most draconian measures ever considered by any president, in my opinion.
Completely psychotic.
But one of the things that was in there was the ability to take a dissident website, that is somebody who's really against the state, right?
In this case, they might take somebody from the alternative media and say, oh, you know, this guy's really exposing us.
Let's just make him into one of these domestic terrorists.
Then people going to that website wouldn't have the ability to view the content that's on the website and the The person who was putting the information up also wouldn't be able to, they wouldn't be able to process their information.
But eventually, the other piece of this that they were contemplating in the legislation was to confound the communications of the people involved.
So, those people that they've decided would be undesirable on the internet suddenly couldn't send emails.
And they create two classes of people those who were kissing up to the establishment, the pharma takeover, and wars overseas, and all the rest, versus people who were calling it out.
The people who are calling it out become an underclass, very much like what they called anti vax people, who were just people who were soundly questioning the medical efficacy of a particular treatment.
So they created, they like to create these second class citizens.
And when they do that, they have the ability to take their rights away.
And that's what the goal is because they can't have everybody having the same rights.
People that they don't agree with, they don't want those people having the right to call them out because it's going to keep them in this position.
Where they only have 20, 30% support.
So they're perpetually in the cycle of trying to get rid of those people and get rid of their voices out there.
That's where the mainstream media really has let the American public down and the public around the world because the media is supposed to be an organ that has the ability to do this and to call out truth to power.
Instead, what we're seeing is they've been bought out long ago.
And it's the last holdout on all this is the alternative media, flaws and all.
And now they're trying to figure out ways they can get rid of that.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We're here in X Series 120 talking about continuity of government cyber threats, the CIA wars.
We're going to be taking your questions in the second half of the program.
And I'm going to go through specific examples of these continuity of government takeovers in the past, the coup to coup piece of this.
Miss Olivia, how are we doing out there?
Good.
Contiki Man says Biden told Putin 16 critical infrastructure entities were off limits in June 2021.
Cyber groups are taking matters into their hands.
Could this trigger NATO Article 5 unscripted?
Yeah, the piece about them taking it into their own hands is interesting.
I think that they're looking for any way to hem in Russia.
They've been doing this for a while and they've developed a hostile atmosphere.
Russia has its own issues.
And Putin is not a savior for the East or the West.
However, you have to get real that we've put the Russians in a position over and over again since the Obama administration.
The Obama administration and Hillary came up with this idea.
Interestingly enough, when we came up with the whole idea through the media that, oh, everything is a Russian plot and Trump's in bed with Russia and all this stuff, and they try to impeach Trump for it, however you feel about that, it was a complete farce.
If you read it through now, All of them, the fantasies of Rachel Maddow and all that stuff, all turned out to be bogus.
And they all turned out to be paid operatives of the Hillary campaign that were spreading that information.
That's just on the record.
And now, with Durham's hardcore report on that, which took years to come out, they're finally getting the bottom line on it.
However, so much of the statute of limitations is gone.
And so the people involved probably won't be prosecuted, unfortunately.
But nonetheless, the people who were pushing the lies involved in that, which involved all kinds of people, not just Trump, And it was all a lie.
So you have to look at situations like that and say, you know, by creating this atmosphere and poisoning the atmosphere with Russia, that's kind of where what's landed us in this position now.
I mean, when we think back to all the way back to what our grandparents went through with the Cuban Missile Crisis, think about that.
You know, President Kennedy had the ability to bomb the hell out of them.
You know, Cuba was tiny, we were huge, and the Russians didn't have much of a stronghold in there.
But as a result, Of running a blockade when they put nuclear missiles in Cuba, he was able to, over 13 days, negotiate a settlement so that we didn't end up having a nuclear war and blowing the world up.
That's kind of the type of diplomacy that we needed in this situation.
We didn't get it.
We got the idea out there that we were going to put NATO on Putin's doorstep.
And Putin now has played into these plans and he's created acts of aggression.
Against Ukraine.
So Ukraine is the one that takes it in the end because the US was maneuvering it on one hand and Putin is coming in with his troops on the other.
So the people in Ukraine are the ones who end up taking the slack, unfortunately.
But we need to undo that game and see that so many of the forces in our country, the MSNBCs, the CNNs, the people who pushed this and created this entire situation.
It's one thing to have an opinion about a world leader, but to create a false Meme narrative that Trump was involved with Putin and Putin was pulling his strings when there was no proof for it and running phony impeachments that cost millions of dollars to the American people to try to go after your political enemies should have a price.
And Pelosi and those types should be paying it.
And unfortunately, the news is just on to the next cycle because predominantly it's a liberal press.
And so that's a big problem that we're facing in this country, but it's created this poisoned well atmosphere.
And as I said, both America and the West and Putin are using Ukraine for their own purposes.
And that's really the thing that needs to be called out more than anything else.
All right.
Let's look at some of this propaganda that the Atlantic put out.
Russia has launched a full scale invasion of Ukraine, sending troops over the border and shelling cities across the country.
True.
Already, dozens of Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in the assault.
Millions more people in the region are now in mortal danger.
Countries around the world are likely to feel some effects as well through physical disruptions and agricultural energy supplies.
Here's the thing going into this conflict, you had the largest inflation since 1982.
The conflict is not driving the inflation run, it's already on a fever run pitch up.
So, Biden can't blame those prices on this.
They were already.
Off the hook, and he was already failing miserably.
The supply issues well, who's creating the supply issues?
How did that even happen?
And now they're saying, well, this is going to create supply issues.
Well, look, we already have them.
We started the year with them because of whatever Biden was up to.
And we still don't have the answers for why all these containers were just hanging out there.
And we still don't have the answers for empty shelves.
They're not good answers.
And the COVID thing, oh, well, first of all, you didn't have to have those mandates in place.
So destroying people's lives and livelihoods created part of that.
And you might say, oh, that's just part of the COVID thing.
Well, it's not.
You chose to.
Enforce unconstitutional mandates and destroy people's lives.
So we have to kind of get to the bottom of these things and get past the headlines and their excuses.
But even beyond that, what are they up to?
Why are they disrupting the food supply?
Why are they already raising inflation to a point where most people can't afford even to buy a house?
What's going on there?
Forget about the crisis aspect.
Of course, we're acknowledging the, you know, This and getting deep into the Ukraine crisis.
But put it aside just for a moment.
This stuff is already happening.
So, what is it that they're up to?
This is the thing that we need to unwind as we go along here tonight.
If and when such cyber, Russian cyber attacks, actually, I'm going to go back, countries around the world are likely to feel some effects as well via physical disruption of agriculture and energy supplies and digital disruption caused by Russian cyber attacks.
Okay, this is the Atlantic pushing the same thing.
The latter in particular could easily end up reaching the United States.
If and when such attacks might come, it's impossible to predict, says Michael Daniel, who served as cybersecurity advisor to President Obama.
The Cybersecurity Infrastructure and Security Agency already issued advice to businesses and other organizations on how to avoid digital invasions and respond if hackers successfully breach their defenses.
But individual Americans are getting little governmental guidance on what they can and should be doing to prepare.
The Russian government is not likely for the moment to target our.
Infrastructure, Daniel told me, that'd be a big escalation.
But American computers could be compromised and collateral damage from Russian attacks on Ukrainian systems.
So these are the excuses that they're using already.
And it's interesting because they start to talk in the article about keeping a certain amount of food on hand and things like that.
Prepper type things.
What they've realized is that people saw the system going down and they saw the financial system in real trouble.
And a number of them were doing things to You know, sort of buffer themselves against a collapse.
They're trying to get, and you might notice this in the mainstream media a lot, they're trying to get ahead of these things and co opt the terms and even the actions.
So I say, oh, yeah, you should do this.
You know, make sure you have two weeks' worth of food in your house, where already people who are tuned into this stuff are way ahead of the ballgame.
So they're trying to get ahead on the language side, which I find very interesting.
The other thing that they've been doing is talking just before the war broke out there in Ukraine, they were talking about how Russia might create a false flag.
In Ukraine as an excuse to go in.
Now, this is interesting because this is the stuff that they used to accuse the alternative media of hyping and being conspiracy nuts and everything else.
Well, the State Department spokesperson came out and said, hey, there might be a false flag.
And that's weird to hear them use that term.
It is.
Megan Kelly used it.
Did she really?
Yeah, she did.
About what?
Oh, I forget now.
I've been watching so much news, I can't compare it.
But my jaw dropped when I heard her say it.
It is very interesting.
What I see is that they realize that certain types of language penetrated people as they're starting to become aware.
So now they need to pretend that, oh, we've been talking about that all along.
Hey, continuity of government, hey, that's something that Nancy Pelosi talked about last summer.
You know, when they've kept these things under wraps for 30 years in many cases.
Now they'll co opt the language so that they can't be accused of hiding the facts.
This is crucial.
Let's keep going with this.
Will Americans buy into Biden's ambitious domestic terrorism plan?
This is the other side of that coin.
This is where they need to go.
Which is anyone who disagrees with the administration is a domestic terrorist, subject to having their assets frozen, subject to having their civil liberties denied, subject even to not having any rights and being arrested under circumstances that you might arrest somebody for Al Qaeda, for example.
This is the thing that they were after.
It was like a Patriot Act for regular citizens who didn't agree with their policies.
And they were driven largely by.
Psychos at MSNBC, like $40 million a year, Rachel Maddow, because she's getting paid so much to create all the false narratives about Russia and to create the whole false Trump impeachment narrative and to create the whole false domestic terrorism thing.
And then the whole thing about, oh, if you take the vaccine, by the way, you can't spread it to anybody else.
And then it was immediately proved false.
So as long as they have those people positioned, And people think, oh, that's the news.
I'm getting the news.
This is what I'm being told.
And if anything was amiss, these people would be telling me.
So, that system, even though a lot, a lot of people have gotten out of it and gotten over into something in the alternative media, or like the kind of work that we're putting out here with dark journalism, but there's too many people still in that system.
And they're still pumping too much money into that system.
So, it still has that impact.
And so, just like we saw with what they did with the COVID op, largely they were able to.
Pipeline for the Whole Thing00:02:53
Create all kinds of spectacles and then two years later walk most of them back.
And you'll have the same people.
There's this one woman, of course, Dr. Wen, who lives up here.
One of my favorites.
And, you know, CNN uses her as the medical expert.
It's a very unusual character because she will literally lie directly into the camera and then a week later say exact opposite.
And this is supposed to be medical authority, but instead she's a real plant for that group.
So when we think about these things, we have to.
Keep our wits about us in terms of what we are receiving in terms of output, especially about the Russian Ukraine war, because the whole goal is to create an emergency situation like a blackout, like a cyber security issue that would affect everything, cause an emergency, and give them continuity of government powers.
That's what they're after.
This is where they're going.
And thank God our friend Trudeau was such a greedy little guy because he gave us the heads up that the emergency powers are going to be invoked.
And he did it.
With good old Christia behind it.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We're going deep now into the coup to coup, COG, CIA wars, and the emergency powers that they're trying to invoke through continuity of government.
We're going to be taking your questions in the second half of the show.
For this part, I'm going to go through.
Well, before I do that, I want to remind you to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for our newsletter.
It's a free newsletter, but it keeps us in touch with each other with the massive, and I mean massive, Just remarkable censorship that we've been seeing.
That we should have these systems in place where we can directly communicate.
And basically, you'll get the newsletter once a week.
It'll let you know about the incredible episodes that we have coming up for you, including the one that's out there right now for subscribers, which is the second part of our Catherine Austin Fitz interview, which is remarkable.
And I highly suggest that you sign on for that.
Of course, part one we put out to the public.
And I'm really working.
How long is the Catherine Austin Fitz part two that's for subscribers?
Oh, it's like an hour and a half.
Yeah.
It's like an hour and a half.
It's remarkable, really.
I highly recommend it.
And I'm going to be doing more with Catherine shortly here.
We have some great interviews coming up, some great documentary work and things for you guys out there.
Excellent X Series episodes coming up.
So that newsletter is kind of the pipeline for the whole thing.
So make sure you go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for that.
And again, it's a free newsletter.
Okay.
Can I throw you a question?
Yeah, sure.
CIA UFO False Info00:15:50
This is such an intriguing question.
So, Rosterman the Seer says, Haven't ETs said they won't allow any more nuclear explosions here on Earth?
Well, there's all kinds of contact cases where they say that they got involved because we were setting off nukes.
And those communications, especially in the 50s and things, there's a long history of this.
It makes sense in many ways that it was the nuclear era that really brought so much of the UFO reality to the surface.
There were a lot of sightings before as well.
It's just in our culture, we didn't really acknowledge it until 1947.
And the whole thing about crashes and all the rest of it.
There's a very well documented crash from Cape Girardeau, Missouri, which is where Harry Truman was a senator in 1941, that predates the Roswell incident by six years, if you can imagine.
So these things were happening substantially way before the UFO era happened.
But And then there's the Foo Fighters in World War II.
That's also previous to Roswell.
But this idea that we were moving into a phase where we could blow the planet up would cause other groups to be extra concerned.
So, yeah, I do feel in terms of them preventing it, it's quite interesting because there's a large history of UFO sightings where they're right over nuclear bases and shutting off missiles.
Yes.
Which would seem to indicate that they say some concern, yes.
And of course, the CIA people who are pushing the UFO threat, their whole thing is that, oh, that's part of the threat.
They can shut off our news.
It's a very simple rule, I think, with the CIA and the UFO field.
No CIA in the UFO field.
Doesn't that feel a lot better?
So, you know, now what they're doing is they're coming out.
This is the girl.
I need to talk to you for this for a second.
You know so much about contact cases and people who get abducted and then have regressions and then.
You know, they had these experiences and it's coming from a particular place.
Now, Elizondo is starting to hint that he has these extra abilities, right?
And he's the guy, he's the CIA guy who came out and said that he was the head of this secret UFO program.
Well, interestingly enough, Jim Semivan, who was the CIA director for 25 years, he's part of the directorate, not the actual director, but a very high level CIA figure, and who was a key person to the Stars Academy.
He actually created the corporation with Tom DeLong and Elizondo.
He claims now that he had experiences with beings, he had contacts with beings.
And now, this Ramirez guy, he's a CIA guy, he came out and he's like, Oh, I was abducted and placed on a table and had all these things done to me.
I mean, do you really think that people are going to buy this CIA?
Really, this is remarkable.
So, you're going to come in on the experiencer.
Side and be like, oh, hey, great CIA agents who had experiences with aliens.
Tell us all about it and be the chief authorities.
And then they'll run these people around the way they've been running Elizonda.
Isn't that shameless?
The only way you can tell whether something's bullshit or not is when the narrative changes, right?
This is, COVID has taught us a lot.
Yes.
And, you know, you come out with a story and you have a complete story and you don't hold back.
And that's, you know, You've interviewed people who are for real, right?
And their narrative doesn't shift.
It doesn't change.
It doesn't evolve.
It doesn't become more exotic, right?
It's all there in one piece.
When year after year it changes because they have to, I don't know, it has to get more sexy and exciting as time goes on to keep people's interest, then you know it's bullshit.
Suddenly it's psychic Lou leading the masses.
When you see this, I mean, I think it's a very simple formula throw the CIA out of the UFO field.
How's that?
Doesn't it feel good?
You know, there's so many things we're uncertain about.
It feels really good to be certain about that.
There it is.
No CIA in the UFO field.
All right, let's get into some of the things the CIA has done.
Let's remember that the CIA was created by Harry Truman.
He originally rejected the idea of creating the Central Intelligence Agency because after the war, they wanted a peacetime OSS.
And the OSS had already done some questionable things under Wild Bill Donovan, but they had the You know, excuse of hey, this is war, so war is hell, and we'll do whatever we can.
But Truman said, you know, this sounds to me like a domestic Gestapo, and I'm not going to go for it.
And so he initially held back, eventually caving in in 47 with the creation of the National Security Act.
After the death of President Kennedy, Truman wrote famously an editorial in the Washington Post saying, basically, we have to get rid of the CIA or completely reconstruct it because it never was meant.
To be the kind of body that they've created.
And this was a month to the day after the assassination, and the CIA freaked out.
The former director, Dulles, went to St. Louis to visit with Truman and say, You have to print our attraction immediately and say you just never did it.
And he said, The conversation, as related by Truman's aide, was Look, I'm old.
You can't do anything to me anymore.
So you can't threaten me.
Get out.
And so Dulles went back to the Washington Post and said, Truman's feeble.
I try to have a conversation with him.
He has Alzheimer's, you know, and that's why that was written.
So, this was the, even though Truman was the guy who created, you know, signed the statute for the Central Intelligence Agency.
This is a real snapshot in the government, though, about the problem there, because there you have the president, the former president, who understands this other president was killed as a result of the action of the CIA, and he knows that he created the Frankenstein.
He comes out on the record and says, we have to amend it or end it because it can't go on like this.
These guys have too much power, and what are we going to do?
So, but that government and that deep state arm inside of the Central Intelligence Agency still moving, still doing their thing, bypassing those officials that set it up in the first place.
And of course, Kennedy's attempt to rein it in, and some of those accounts by Schlesinger and other people who was his aide, and the Kennedy historian, that Kennedy, when he got into office, could not believe the powers that the Central Intelligence Agency had.
This is 1961.
So, we're talking 60 years ago.
So, you can imagine that bloated thing has just become more bloated, has its own air force, controls all these sectors, Hollywood, the media, wars in Ukraine.
This is the kind of stuff that they've been doing for decades.
So, how do you rein that structure in?
The first thing is you identify it where it's active and you create pressure inside the government to eliminate it because it's an extra constitutional agency.
And you are able to replace it and create a good, worthy, clandestine.
Agency to do what it was supposed to do in the first place, which was what?
Supply intelligence to the president so he can make the decisions, not make the decisions for him, and then put him in a position.
So there's a famous story about Kennedy learning that the CIA had assassinated the Dem brothers.
And those were the people who were leading Vietnam in 63.
This is only like a month before his own assassination.
And You know, he puts down something and says, Look, I have put out here an actual memo telling these guys not to do this.
How on earth did this ever happen?
But it also freaks him out dramatically because he realizes, Oh, they're going into this phase.
By the time they do the actual Kennedy assassination, something very strange takes place, which is people who are associated with the continuity of government group, the Doomsday Network, the people who are set up to survive in the event of a nuclear war.
This is the group we're talking about.
In COG.
This is their origin.
And one of the people involved in those emergency communications networks was a Secret Service agent named Winston Lawson, who set up the Dallas trip, which was loaded with all the pitfalls and allowed Kennedy to go into that shooting zone, which was a kill zone.
So this is part of our history of the government.
We're trying to understand and look at well, what happened with NATO putting all this force and pressure, you know.
In Ukraine, and the idea that they were going to make Ukraine part of NATO, which provoked an action from Putin, and then Putin goes in brutally.
We have to understand where those pressures come from and how deeply the Central Intelligence Agency is involved, just like they were involved with getting us into Afghanistan and Iraq.
What was it in Iraq that got us into a war?
It was the false information from the Central Intelligence Agency.
It's false information.
It was the WMDs, they have weapons of mass destruction.
That was the buzzword.
So that got us in there.
So instead of the, you know, they had apologies at the end.
CIA said, we're sorry we gave you faulty intelligence.
Well, explain that to the soldiers that went over there and got killed or the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who are dead as a result of your faulty intelligence.
So, you know, that just doesn't cut it.
The fact that the whole thing wasn't torn down and reformed for lying like that.
Because we have to remember their motivations as an agency come from the fact that they were born out of not a military.
They were born out of New York law firms that dealt with international finance, like Sullivan and Cromwell.
That's where the real push and the impetus for the Central Intelligence Agency came from.
They wanted the ability, and of course, I always cite Professor Scott's work on this, but they wanted the ability, if they set up oil fields in Kazakhstan, for example, that if there was a revolution there, that they wouldn't lose all their money.
And all their oil fields wouldn't go away.
So, they wanted the ability for an agency to be able to create a political climate for them to be able to thrive under these circumstances.
So, that needs to be called out because now it's gone so global.
And when we look at something like what happened in Canada, the continuity of government program now, it's not just an American piece.
Everyone's trying to use the emergency powers to suppress their citizens.
Australia tried to use it, and it Ended up that they only had 83 cases during the whole COVID wave.
This is the real medical information that came out.
Wasn't that 83?
I think that was the number.
Something ridiculously infinitesimal like that.
So, you know, we have to remember the stakes that are involved.
And if we can keep some of that history in mind, we'll get it.
So the fact that Lawson, who was from the Central Intelligence, was from the Secret Service, but part of that continuity of government apparatus and actually used the emergency network during the assassination in setting up.
The presidential motorcade is very significant.
But then it goes further because every major deep event, as Professor Scott found in American history, kept involving continuity of government players.
And I was reading one which is particularly interesting because James McCord was a deep CIA player, but he is best known as one of the Watergate burglars.
But this guy, there are two very heavy continuity of government players in the Nixon.
One of them is John Dean, who he and his girlfriend both worked for the continuity of government people.
And so he was involved in taking down the president.
But James McCord also was involved in it.
And I wanted to get really specific about it because I'd heard this on a number of occasions.
This is the actual document that cites it.
And they're talking about the setup in the early 70s about how they are tightening up and including HUD of all agencies as part of the continuity of government program.
But one of the things I found interesting, and this is in a book called Continuity of Government Program by Douglas Campbell, but the book I recommend on this is American Deep State by Professor Scott.
But what it says is the plans would involve basically monitoring a number of citizens, not just surviving in the case of a nuclear attack.
They were like, well, any emergency.
Let's suppose the emergency is a war that we don't want.
We want to be able to track citizens and throw dissidents in jail.
This is where this part of COG got shaped.
And we hear so much about this now.
It reminds me very much of the Canadian situation when they were saying, we shouldn't tolerate these people's views.
You know, it's like this other group over here, if they have views like this, we shouldn't tolerate.
Oh, what does that mean?
What if you're not tolerating them?
What happens then?
That sounds like Hitler language, doesn't it?
We have to ask Trudeau what he meant.
Okay.
Moorhead says, Moorhead is the person giving the report.
James?
Yes.
Let's be clear about that.
Moorhead said James W. McCord Jr., who was arrested as part of the Watergate scandal, see June 17, 1972, was one of the several individuals responsible for drafting the continuity of government plans.
Moorhead alleges McCord developed a national watch list as part of the program.
This is very interesting.
The national watch list now is so easy to achieve with the digital setup and the social media living that we have.
But you can imagine in 1972, when they were sort of fine tuning this program, they were like, we have a massive anti war protest movement.
What can we do to, you know, if we have to call that emergency, we would be able to grab all those dissidents and all those people who didn't agree with the government, the John Lennon types, and just throw them in prison, basically, because they're against the government.
This became part of the continuity of government setup, wasn't part of it before.
Just like in the 80s, they changed it from nuclear emergency to emergency.
That's also very crucial.
The people who did that were former Nixon alumni, Cheney and Rumsfeld.
So let's keep that in mind as we go along here.
And they call that reorganization plan number one 1973 proposal abolishment of the Office of Emergency Preparedness, and they consolidated it into HUD and GSA.
But McCord is interesting because it reminds me of a story that was going around.
Lansdale and Asia Plans00:06:31
During the Kennedy assassination, which was all about Ed Lansdale.
And Ed Lansdale was between the CIA and the Air Force, the top people.
And everywhere that Lansdale would go, there would be a gigantic overthrow of a leader, and they would keep installing the people that they wanted in Southeast Asia.
But Lansdale, if you really track him back, his history gives us a lot to really think about, because during the OSS period, he was one of the first people to experiment.
With drugs on prisoners to see what kind of reactions he could get.
And it became the basis of the MKUltra program that was launched in the 50s when they had LSD and everything else.
Lansdale became the chief go to man for the Vietnam War.
And he just became the ultimate Dulles puppet for every kind of military industrial incursion.
But they've been using him for decades for that.
Now, during the Kennedy assassination, Fletcher Proudhon, who was both in charge of, he was liaison between the Pentagon and the CIA, he worked for Lansdale.
And Lansdale sent him to Antarctica during the Kennedy assassination because later he figured out one of the jobs that he would have had was setting up security in Dallas for president.
He must have figured out that Fletcher was a straight shooter and wouldn't have gone along with these plans.
Oddly enough, Lansdale himself then retires.
And he leaves the Air Force right on Halloween, literally three weeks before the assassination.
One of the things that Proudhon did was he looked at all the pictures around the Kennedy assassination and he found Lansdale in one of the pictures near some of the people that they had hauled off these rail cars, who were always suspected of having some involvement in the case.
That is actually one of the famous pictures of Lansdale walking by the tramps.
And there were a lot of identifications of Lansdale from different military authorities who had retired that Proudy went to and said, We worked with this guy.
What do you think he was doing here during the Kennedy assassination?
This is only 25 minutes after the assassination, and the police are walking these figures in, and there's Lansdale in the back, somehow reassuring them or telling them things are going to be okay.
Now, interestingly enough, in the Kennedy assassination case, you had.
The entire cabinet on their way to Asia.
So, if anything had gone wrong during the Kennedy assassination, the coup that was taking place here, and the involvement of the continuity of government players, that group, the entire cabinet, is already on their way over to Asia.
And what happens is they stop in Hawaii.
And the weird thing is, one of the things I learned was that when the assassination happens, all their talks change, everything that they're laying out, the Kennedy agenda, it all stops.
And they actually change the names of the presentations and the things that they're working on.
It's a very unusual set of circumstances.
One of the weird things is that even though they don't make it to Japan, which is where they were going to have the first conference, they turn back once they're en route from Hawaii to Japan.
But the newspapers in Japan had already prepared stories of them being there and giving speeches and all the rest, and they ran them because they were there, even though they never even touched down.
So something.
In the world information broadcast chain was being interfered with.
Now, Lansdale is very interesting, and I'll go and do a deeper history in another episode on him.
But I find it fascinating that here is this person who was so good and so well specialized at overthrowing other governments and had worked for the CIA and doing that and had been involved with tracking down the Japanese leadership after the war and was just such a deep state.
Player himself, his presence walking through Dealey Plaza, making sure his job, everything's going all right there.
There's a lot of interesting things in relation to the case that aren't often talked about, including the fact that the Army went through in tanks the night before through Dallas and supposedly distributing toys for kind of like a Toys for Tots program.
But obviously, they were laying out the possibility of, oh, if there's an emergency, And people figure out that there's a group inside the government that killed the president, will need to be able to say, oh, it's martial law and the Soviets did it or something.
So we need to keep these pieces in mind as we thread it through.
So if we go from the first coup in 63, then we go through the second one, which is Nixon.
And again, those continuity of government players, McCord and Dean.
And Dean, remember, was Nixon's lawyer.
The idea of him unraveling Nixon is quite remarkable.
So, there have been a number of researchers, and this is the 50th anniversary of Watergate that's coming up here in June.
But a number of researchers have said they were going to do the same thing with Nixon, because at a certain point, even Nixon became uncontrollable for this group.
And the people who were involved with COG again were deeply involved in one, participating in Watergate, which is McCord, and then two, in exposing Watergate so that Nixon would have to resign, John Dean.
So, these players have been involved.
On a deep level, Iran contra Ali North.
He's the main person who sets up the new COG for Reagan in the 1980s.
And then when we look at that situation, he's the person who's in charge of what?
The Doomsday Network.
The Doomsday Network is that radio network that they will use to communicate with each other under the circumstances of a nuclear attack.
But it's so secret, you're not going to be able to track the communications that are involved there.
Deep State Connections00:06:02
So this is how we.
We need to understand and really think about North.
Yes, what do you got?
Do you really want me to read it?
Sure.
Okay, Lawrence of Aragon says, I'm pissed off.
Two weeks ago, my unvaxxed ass was the biggest problem in America.
Now I'm nobody.
That's great.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We're going deep now and we're looking at where this series of COG coups have occurred in the history here in America and how this is now going global in this continuity of government group.
And the emergency powers of dictates that are being seized by dictators around the world, like those in New Zealand and Australia.
And I know they're starting to give up a lot of these emergency powers now.
They activated them and they held us under them.
And I don't believe they'll give them up for long.
That's the thing, because they have their test data now.
So the next things they were thinking, I believe, oh, we're going to be able to use a climate authority and those will be our emergencies.
Something strange has happened here with their timing.
There are people who predicted that this would go down.
Interestingly enough, Alex Jones, for all people, whatever you might think of Alex, he predicted in October that there was going to be a war in February.
So that intel was moving around.
Somebody knew that this part was going to go down.
And also, you notice the sub pivot of the Biden administration, who was completely down in the dumps after Afghanistan, inflation, and whatever other disaster they had in their first year.
Now they're all over.
They love this, right?
It's a war.
People rally around the president.
People do love war.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, they don't.
But no, no.
I mean, there's some, there's something.
It makes things very clear.
Right.
They like that clear cut thing of, oh, I need to, you know, back up my guy against this other guy.
So I guess the snapshot there to kind of round up the early section of the coups is that those two bodies, the Central Intelligence Agency and the executive branch, represent, Depending on who's running them at the time, represent these two groups in action, which is that first split that took place, and it happened between Dulles and JFK.
JFK understood oh, you know, these guys try to trick me into war in Cuba.
One, they're launching their own wars all over the world, and they're creating a nuclear confrontation.
So he gets the opportunity to fire them.
After the Bay of Pigs.
And Dulles comes in and says, You can't fire me.
You know, I've had this position over a decade.
It's not going to happen.
And Kennedy says, Look, if this was the UK, I'd have to go.
But it's America.
You have to go.
This is the attitude that we need for these leaders who have gone over the line.
And I think Kennedy really lays it out quite well in that.
And, you know, he lets them go gracefully.
He doesn't publicly chastise them, but he, behind the scenes, he fires him.
And to fire a sacred cow, Like Alan Dulles is a remarkable move.
And he fires his deputy too, who was the brother of the mayor of Dallas, which is pretty interesting the way those things, those connections roll around.
But the idea is that this force still existed that was involved with this underground government.
And that underground government, the covert government that's connected with continuity of government, fighting with the overt government, which is the regular executive branch.
In this case, in the Biden case, the overt government is the same thing as the covert government.
You can't distinguish them.
But when they got Trump in there, he wasn't part of their structure.
And again, that's not to say Trump was the great holy guy, but he wasn't part of that deep state.
And this is something true liberals, like Professor Scott, for example, points out very well that that group can't wait to get rid of Trump and they'll do anything they could to get rid of him, including the false impeachments and the Russia stories and all the rest.
But that fight is still there in the heart of the government, which is there's the deep state that wants.
Global control, and they come through that CIA wing of basically New York international finance law firms.
That's where we got that.
And we need to be real about this.
We need to stop pretending that this is an episode of Homeland or something where the CIA is trying to save us from terrorists.
You know, there are all kinds of military services where there are heroic acts or whatever.
What I'm speaking to is the actions of an agency that are extra constitutional, illegal.
And when we look at situations, Like the one that we are going through with the Ukraine war and the people on the ground, they're suffering.
How much manipulation of the Central Intelligence Agency is responsible for that?
They caused the suffering in the Iraq war.
How do they get called out in the system?
How do we reform or eliminate the Central Intelligence Agency?
It has to be part of the political dialogue because they've caused a lot of mischief and incredible suffering and they've caused America to be at great risk.
And it's not just to pinpoint the Central Intelligence Agency, I think we should.
But they're part of this structure.
And the structure has been laid out by Professor Scott as the deep state.
And the things that we're going through and the connections in that deep state to the continuity of government players, if you look for those connections, you can find them.
And I'm going to quote from Professor Scott as we go along here.
I want to remind everyone to go to the darkjournalist.com website and sign up for our newsletter and make sure that we have that open communication with each other in this era of censorship.
Consolidation of Power00:16:12
Which is going into overdrive.
We're going to be taking your questions here very shortly and a little more to lay out in relation to these COG coups that I want to get to, including the coup that's taking place right now.
And it's a different kind of a coup because it has to do basically with the fraud involved in the current White House occupant and his connection to the Ukraine.
Everyone, I also want to say that, you know.
In terms of your questions, like we'll try to get as many of them in tonight on this as possible, and we'll try to stay as much on topic as possible.
Let's, what do you got over there?
Wendy Eater says, Can DJ explain if there's a difference between COG and martial law?
Well, here's how COG works it's a good question.
Continuity government kicks in, it's a system that kicks in, and it requires an emergency to make it active.
Now, we live under, it was activated during September 11th, so we still live under emergency powers.
Since the September 11th attacks, every president signs it.
Trump signed it, Obama signed it, Bush definitely signed it gleefully.
But the idea is that as long as that emergency exists, they can do a number of illegal things because they're using the Emergency Powers Act.
Now, they tie it to the NDAA, which is the National Defense Authorization.
And that NDAA contains close to a trillion dollars for the military.
Every year, even though we haven't been at war, you know, this might pull us into an actual ground war, but we haven't been at war.
So, the idea of giving these guys a trillion dollars a year is very strange.
But you know what?
Every year, there's no opposition on either side.
Those Democrats, those Republicans, they love each other when they're signing the NDAA.
They have problems with each other throughout the rest of the year, but hey, something about that NDA really gets them going because they're all involved in the military slosh money one way or another.
And the military has that incredible power.
But I want to say that it's not the military per se, it is The defense contractors, because it's Boeing that's getting that money.
It's Lockheed Martin that's getting that money.
So, you know, if the money were actually going to soldiers and going to their pension plans and stuff like that, this would be fantastic.
But it's not.
As a matter of fact, they balk at giving soldiers raises and, you know, they don't give them very good, they balk at even giving them the proper health care after they go through the tragedy of a war zone.
So, you know, let's get real about that.
That's one thing that Trump was very good about.
So, continuity government gets triggered, and then what happens is NORTHCOM, which is the Northern Command Post, they become the combatant commanders of the United States.
So, the president stands down, and the combatant commander general takes over.
And his name is Van Herk.
I've done a lot of, you know, kind of profiling of him, and I'm still looking for more information.
But Van Herk, as the leader of NORTHCOM, Automatically becomes the leader of the United States during continuity of government.
If COG is activated, then the regular rules of, you know, well, we go to the vice president, then we go to the speaker of the house, and that whole thing, and the secretary of state, that all gets rubbed out.
Continuity government goes past all that and it installs NORTHCOM as the leader.
Now, that's interesting because NORTHCOM didn't even exist until 2022.
So this is very odd.
And it's also odd to have.
A military group that's supposed to command the United States.
We had Southcom, and this was a way for us to keep an eye on our assets, for example, in places like South America.
But Northcom is directed completely at our citizens.
And it goes into this idea we're going to protect the homeland and all that stuff.
So it suspends the Constitution and it brings in this whole system.
Martial law, a president can call martial law.
For certain types of emergencies and activate the emergencies.
But in the event of continuity of government, you actually suspend the entire structure of the government and NORTHCOM takes over.
So, yeah, I mean, they have things in common.
I would just say that the continuity of government players operate under such secrecy that, in fact, we need to get through the secrecy of the continuity of government program to see what their powers are.
Great question.
What do you got?
Well, Wendy Eater again, are Putin's actions helping or hindering the deep state?
Oh, well, now he's helping them dramatically because they have the ability to create this whole phony cyber warfare attack in the United States idea because we know that that's not legit.
And, but because he's shown his own aggression against the Ukraine, they can pin anything they want on him.
And I think part of this is a calculation on his side.
But, you know, instantly they were like, hey, we can tie up his money and we could do all this stuff.
This is interesting to me, isn't it?
It seems like, don't you notice in all these emergencies, the first thing they want to do, they want money.
It's like, oh, we want this money.
And the money that they froze, it turns out the Biden administration, the money that they froze that were Afghanistan interests after the Taliban wouldn't give up bin Laden and all this kind of stuff, and that we weren't actually at war with the Taliban at the time.
So we froze all these assets, and then we end up giving them $100 billion worth of weapons when we flee.
From Afghanistan under very strange circumstances last summer.
But all that money, and it's a lot of money that we froze in Afghanistan assets, now they're saying, oh, we're going to give it away to families here.
And, you know, this is a very strange thing.
This obfuscation and the consolidation of other groups' money seems to be the thing here.
Remember Christia Freeland?
Oh, we're going to take the money of the protesters.
To just kind of rule over these funds, and they want to create any emergency edict where they get to control the money.
They are baiting us.
Yes.
I mean, I have to say, I am so furious.
We all should be, but I don't know what to do about it at all.
But that's interesting.
Interesting what they said about that.
It actually made me think of this because what they did was they said, oh, we're going to take all these oligarchs that are in Russia and we're going to take their money too.
Anything that's in an American bank.
And those oligarchs will be, you know, Basically, they're citizens of Russia, right?
What do they have to do with the policy of Russia?
So you're just going to take their money because you don't like Russia?
I mean, this is very, very slippery slope.
Yeah, Scarlet Fire says baiting for civil war.
That's exactly it.
Yes.
Because they want martial law.
Yes.
And they want a gun grab eventually.
Now, here's the thing the best way to prevent civil war is to expose what they're doing so that they don't get to a point where they can provoke.
Provoking is a big piece, you know, in the art of war and all that kind of thing.
And I think, so in this case, Putin has done himself a lot of damage by attacking a defenseless population, a largely defenseless population.
And that's never defensible.
But I will say that the United States and the Western powers intentionally created the scenario for this by not giving the security assurance that we wouldn't have NATO there.
It's the same thing when President Kennedy faced down the Russians in Cuba.
They said, We want an assurance that you won't invade Cuba.
And Kennedy gave them.
An assurance that he wouldn't invade Cuba if they took the missiles out of there because the United States wasn't in the business of invading countries.
So, this should have been something that was put in the diplomatic session with Russia on this.
No, we won't put NATO in the Ukraine because putting NATO in the Ukraine is like basically putting an enemy on your doorstep.
And so, this is how we get into this.
So, both sides are really doing the worst, and the deep state kind of Gaining the returns out of it because the military industrial complex will thrive out of this crisis.
And if the deep state in America can use this crisis as a way to create a false cyber attack where they can consolidate the powers and say, oh, you need the government and we're going to restart the internet with only the good people and we're going to make the rest of you second class citizens who disagree with our policies and won't take the pharma fascism.
And so it goes.
There's consolidation involved, shall we say.
Yeah.
Jackie says, so does DJ think that?
Putin is not making a sincere stand against the globalists and NATO.
He is, but for his own reasons.
Yeah, I mean, it's not altruistic.
And I do feel like, you know, it was a terrible move on his part to attack a defenseless population, you know, to see people in subways and things like that.
You know, he's destroying people's lives.
So he's also culpable.
Here, but the deep state forces that are involved in creating this tension.
And then, you know, instead of ratcheting it down, they ratcheted it up.
And they're obviously going to gain from this.
And they're going to gain the excuse, is what they want the provocation and the excuse.
And, but there might be something else going on here also.
And I'm going to get into some of that as well, because, you know, all of our flights into space take place through Russia.
And so there's a lot of strangeness.
Biden also talked in his press conference about hitting their aerospace interests.
So there are things here about satellites and what satellites can see and disrupting the ability for satellites to see.
Now they have this provocation that gives them the ability to interfere.
But whatever it is that's going on there, it's hard to get a real handle on the space aspect, although I think it needs to be looked at as maybe the most significant.
Two weird things came up during this crisis.
I'm going to lay them both out for you.
One of them is about Voronezh, which one of their kind of fanciest, best Russian planes went down there.
And that was the site of a major UFO event, which took place in a park in 1989.
A number of people saw it.
That's one weird signature.
The other weird signature is Chernobyl.
They sent them saying very early on, we took over Chernobyl.
The Russians took over the Chernobyl power plant, which had the incredible accident in the 80s.
I find those signatures strange.
The Voronezh one, let's just look at it real quick because, you know, I mean, we also have to say this that the Ukrainian president, there's a lot of strange things going on there as well.
And I'm happy to go through them.
But just to point one out real quickly, you know, I mean, this guy has a career as an actor.
And a comedian.
And in fact, during one of his main roles was playing the president in the series, The President of Ukraine, no, Servant of the People, where he played the role of the president of Ukraine.
I mean, isn't that a little bit strange?
Kind of, I think there's a lot more to be seen there with Zelensky.
And he's saying, I'm Russia's number one target.
There's a hit squad after me.
And, you know, I don't like to doubt people.
Who say things like that?
They probably are after him, but the whole way this is playing out with him, you know, the deep state could have put him in a position and now just, you know, pulling the pin and saying, hey, we're cutting our losses and he can take the brunt of this.
We got our war with Russia going.
Now we can create this false cyber war scenario and announce new emergency powers.
There was something too satisfied about Biden in those press conferences.
Even though he's stumbling around, even though he's not thinking straight, there's this weird self satisfaction with it and with Jens Saki as well.
And that doesn't strike me as a normal wartime pose.
They knew they were going to be able to play this out.
And I need to, and we need to collectively get to the bottom of that.
Great questions and the ideas from tonight.
Unbelievable.
A fantastic crowd.
Here already.
I'm going to read you the Voronezh piece now.
Is that good?
Go for it.
All right.
Voronezh.
Russia's task confirmed Voronezh UFO incident on this day in 1989.
Russia confirmed the reports of sightings of three aliens in the city of Voronezh arriving on this UFO October 9th, 1989.
Okay.
Same place now becomes the site of what?
26 AN 26 aircraft crashed in Russia's Voronezh region during this crisis.
So Voronezh made the headlines with that crash.
Also, these are some of the most elite Russian Aerospace Forces planes.
So the crew died as well.
The press service of the Western Military District told journalists on February 24th, an AN 26 aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces crashed in the Voronezh region.
Carrying out planned flight for transportation and military property.
The crew perished.
There was no damage to the ground, according to preliminary information.
For that to happen in the middle of this conflict, I think, is quite remarkable.
Voronezh is also unusual in this sense, which is it has one of the largest treasure troves of Egyptian artifacts in their museums for anything close by.
For Russia, the most concentrated Egyptian antiquities.
It's just kind of interesting.
The other thing I find interesting is there used to be a major nuclear plant there.
So, something about that signature of Voronezh and the alien story, which is really quite remarkable because when I went through this and I remembered some of it, this involved a police chief down there seeing a lot of this with a huge crowd.
And there's actually a video of someone 30 years later who was a kid during the whole incident talking about this craft coming down and these aliens coming out of it, walking around.
And at one point, the official report through TASS goes that, you know, the police grabbed one of these creatures and put him in basically a paddy wagon.
And they go to drive him to the station and he disappears.
You know, I mean, really far out, bizarre, strange.
But all the people involved in the case have always stuck by the story.
And then when you watch that interview with the person who was a child and 30 years later talking about it, they're like, oh, yeah, this is what happened.
The ship came down.
So, Either it was a psyop to see how the crowd would react, or something very unusual took place there in Voronezh.
In any case, the Russian planes were going down.
Dr. Strangelove Scenario00:14:53
New York rolls out statewide cyber command center amid Russian attacks.
This is today, and that Governor Hochul and all the weirdness that's going on in New York with her replacing Cuomo and all that.
Instantly, they're bragging about cyber command.
Something cyber is going on.
We're in the groove.
Can you feel it?
So, they're doing something with the cyber piece, and they're bringing in this idea that our cyber infrastructure will be hit, which means that's the grid, for one.
So, I always talk about the blackout aspect of this.
Two, the financial piece is looming because all the banks depend on that for their exchange.
So, if they want a COG emergency, the cyber attack is really the way to go.
And the fact that they're putting the whole project to Homeland Security.
Which is a quarter of a million people that are there who have unlimited abilities to look into our lives.
And it's a group that didn't exist until September 11th.
So, this is they activate September 11th COG, then we get Department of Homeland Security.
And now, 20 years later, these people want to try to activate the emergency powers and put us in this situation.
I think if we get this buzz out there about COG that we're aware of what they're up to and what the emergency powers are about and not let them spin this.
And the phony cyber attack piece.
You know, we've been vulnerable for a long time to cyber attack, and it hasn't taken place.
It's not to say that they couldn't, but we have a number of things built in.
The idea that this Ukraine situation would suddenly unleash cyber war and the headlines driving it.
When these people get into headlines, you know, that's like the COVID op.
When I see them talking about the UFO threat, I get into the same mindset.
They're looking for that excuse to activate.
Those types of powers and to suspend the Constitution.
But now that action of the continuity of government group is going worldwide because you see it all over the place.
And Canada really is the canary in the coal mine for that because that really was organically a citizens' protest.
It was interfered with by groups who were trying to pump it up and create something like a J6.
But their response, the emergency powers response, was like, look what we can do, and we'll freeze your money if you dare oppose us.
This is the digital situation that we're getting ourselves into.
Okay.
More.
Let's see where we go from here.
I want to read a little more about COG from Professor Scott.
And I also want to talk about this, because this lets us know something very important.
National Security Action Memorandum 57, which we pointed out is something that President Trump activated before he left office, it becomes significant because it creates that tie in again, which is there's one part of that government that is not in lockstep with this huge force and that deep state activity.
So we need to familiarize ourselves with the key moments.
And one of the key moments is.
National Security Action Memorandum 57, which was basically put in by JFK to neuter the Central Intelligence Agency.
And what it said fundamentally was the responsibility for paramilitary operations now belonged to the Joint Chiefs.
It was not a CIA function.
The CIA would be changed into a support role.
And what Trump did is he activated it because the Joint Chiefs at the time were too nervous to do it during Kennedy's era.
They didn't want a showdown with the CIA.
And it never got activated.
But it's on the books.
It's one of the memorandum.
The series is NSAM 55, 56, and 57.
And 57 is the one that really outlines it.
And of course, those are all at the Kennedy Library if anybody wants to read them.
But what Trump did is very interesting because by activating it, he set the timing for early January to take all funding away from the CIA for paramilitary actions.
I'm sure Stepford Biden reversed that as soon as he got in.
I haven't been able to track it down inside the government because I'm sure they want everyone to even forget that this happened.
But Trump knew somebody inside that Trump network knew that this thing was out there and all he had to do was activate it.
And that's something that he did after the election was over, along with the firing of Defense Secretary Esper.
Those are part of the emergency powers wars, in my opinion, because I believe that Trump found out in October, and I arrived at this through talking with Dr. Joseph Farrell, that he knew in October that they had given him.
COVID as a way to try to take the presidency over.
And they wanted to, they had all, they suddenly started talking about continuity of government, which was remarkable.
And they thought, this guy's going to be, we're not going to be able to pull off the voter fraud piece.
We're going to have to do something else.
And this is what they reverted to.
But Trump coming out of that, what does he do?
He fires the defense secretary.
And the defense secretary was the one who had appointed the new COG commander.
And he implements National Security Action Memorandum 57, which was sitting there in government since 1963 when Kennedy was assassinated, because Kennedy was never able to implement it through those joint chiefs, even though it's a presidential memorandum, it's the law.
So it was hanging out there.
And by Trump activating it, it's sort of a shot across the bow with the CIA forces that had been trying to push him out.
But remember, what they were using was Russia.
And it was a false trope.
So now, again, it's Russia.
Back in Kennedy's time, the Cuban Missile Crisis, Khrushchev, it was Russia as well.
So there's something key and fundamental with Russia.
And of course, Russia's space program is very advanced, like our own.
There's some key aspect here that I think we need to cycle around when we're observing this.
Okay, let's keep moving.
Let's go to Professor Scott's citing of.
The COG forces.
How are we doing on time?
You know, we'll take five more minutes on this and then we'll go to your questions.
Okay.
How are you doing over there?
Doing great.
How's the temperature?
People are very educated about everything.
That's the ideas room for you.
I learned a lot by reading your comments as well.
So thank you very much.
Okay.
Common denominator for structural deep events, Project Doomsday and COG.
This is American Deep State, Professor Scott.
And speaking about James McCord, who we studied earlier, who was the Watergate burglar and CIA apparatus who had worked and set up COG in the 70s, McCord's participation in an emergency planning system dealing with telecommunications suggests a common institutional denominator in the backgrounds of almost all the deep events we are considering JFK assassination, 9 11, Iran Contra, etc.
Oliver North, the Reagan Bush point man on Iran Contra planning, was also the national security.
Council Action Officer for Project 908 Planning.
Project 908 is COG.
Just Gino, it's one of the names that they use for it.
And thus he had access to the nation's top secret doomsday communications networks.
North's network, known as Flashboard, excluded other bureaucrats with opposing viewpoints and had its own special worldwide anti terrorist computer network by which members could communicate exclusively with each other and their collaborators abroad.
You know, I want to say this the idea of an excellent intelligence apparatus working hand in glove with the military is a fantastic thing for the military in the United States to have.
It's unfortunate.
That entire system is so polluted and we have so much illegal activity going on.
Because you can see they have the tools to do incredible things to safeguard America.
Okay, Flashboard was used by North and his superiors for extremely sensitive operations that had to be concealed from other hostile parts of the Washington bureaucracy.
These operations included the illegal shipment of arms to Iran.
We know where that went.
They also included other activities still not known.
Perhaps even against Olaf Palm's Sweden.
This is very interesting as well.
Some of those activities are very strange.
And one of the things that Catherine Austin Fitz points out, which I think is a remarkable insight, is right around the time that Reagan is getting briefed on this alien threat idea, the UFO threat, and he's being shown these large ships going around Saturn's rings.
I'm not kidding.
And then he starts including all of this alien threat stuff in his speeches.
And when he meets Gorbachev, he pulls him aside, as Gorbachev said during a meeting at the press club in New York Hey, look, you know, when Reagan took me aside at Reykjavik, he said, Will you help us if there's an alien invasion?
And Gorbachev said, Of course we will.
But he said Reagan was 100% serious.
And everybody, Charlie Rose, pre sex scandal, Charlie Rose was doing the interview at the time.
And, um, It's pretty interesting because Henry Kissinger is there, and everybody looks like they're going to fall faint on their face from the fact that Gorbachev is bringing this out.
And Charlie Rose does this like maniacal laughter, you know, afterwards.
But George Shultz is there as well, who was the Secretary of State under Reagan, and he was there during the meetings.
So the alien aspect of this, the UFO threat piece, was part of the conversation.
So when I hear, so one of the things that Fitz said was all of this.
Fraud and things go off the charts with Iran Contra and all this period.
It's right around the time that Reagan has shown this intel about the rings of Saturn.
And I think that it's significant because what it means is he's giving a green light to some of these operations as a way to get our capacity up to snuff really fast.
And this is something that Philip Corso brought out in his book, which I think contains a lot of very interesting information.
Colonel Corso.
All right, let's keep going with that.
So, some of the things that North may have been looking at Flashboard, America's Emergency Network of the 80s, was the name in 1984 to 86 of the full fledged continuity of government COG emergency network that was secretly planned for 20 years at a cost of billions by a team including Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.
Both were out of the government at the time.
On 9 11, the same network was activated anew by the two men who had planned it out for so many years.
I mean, it's a remarkable.
They did the whole dry run during 9 11 for it.
Question is, what is it for?
And, you know, there were all these rumors during the Ukraine when the war piece took off that there were officials heading to nuclear bunkers.
And there was no way to really kind of clarify this.
However, just as an exercise, I'm sure they would do that because Russia is a nuclear power and they would run it just as a drill.
But think about it in terms of the real deal.
These people would certainly be involved in, it's almost like a Dr. Strangelove type situation where at a certain point they start talking, well, we can repopulate the world our way if we just get through this piece and kind of get rid of the citizens on the surface.
And we have to keep that as there's some people who would be sick enough inside the government.
To try that, you know, and we have to kind of keep that in mind.
And who would be sick enough to use nuclear weapons?
In fact, some of the things that Putin was saying, you know, the consequences of anyone who interferes with me will be like, has never seen before.
You know, that's not the kind of language that somebody who's trying to bring a peaceful resolution to a situation wants.
For some reason, he wants this battle.
And that's not good.
Neither is the fact that they called their.
One of their two major ICBM missiles is named Satan, I think.
And I have to get to the origin of that name, whether we just gave them that name, or that's a kind of acronym for something, but I don't like the title.
Okay.
Since I first advanced the hypothesis that the COG communications network was involved in our structural deep events, I have found further corroboration for it.
For example, John Dean, perhaps the central Watergate figure, had participated in COG activities when serving as the associate.
Deputy Attorney General.
And as an Army Reserve officer, Norman Katz revealed in October 2013 that because of his work in COG communications, he was summoned to Washington in November 1963 in connection with President Kennedy's trip to Dallas.
Somehow, the continuity of government players are in the heart whenever something like very, you know, whenever a deep structural event happens to change history, there's COG right in the middle of it.
We need to keep that in mind as we go forward here.
And I have more to get to on COG, but I'm going to roll now into your questions.
And Miss Olivia, it's up to you.
Okay, let's start.
I'm going to go straight to the juiciest one.
Mickey P wants to know who does DJ think is the most dangerous person in the world?
Futter18 responded Is Kissinger the head of the snake?
Junk Conspiracy Tactics00:15:00
Well, Kissinger is 98.
And I don't know.
I mean, I think of groups as dangerous.
And so the Deep Straight as a.
The deep state as a group is probably the most dangerous thing that we're facing because their ability to flout the law and to kind of do things in public, change the policy, and then retreat into the shadows because we don't have a good apparatus for smashing that wall of secrecy.
This is what the problem is with the UFO file, which is when they're saying, oh, we have the CIA disclosure, it's going to be great.
That's the false threat disclosure, that's not the real thing.
So we're still very much in the dark there.
I would say that the deep state operation around continuity of government is the most dangerous thing that we have.
And I think that's why we give it so much attention and why people like Professor Scott have decided fundamentally that this is a great threat to democracy around the world and to freedom and independence because it's a completely secret organization.
It operates under total secrecy, there's no oversight.
And it's become just like the Central Intelligence Agency, of which is a part of the deep state, it's just become this incredible, hidden, invisible agency that we can't see who they are or what they do.
But we have some fundamental figureheads that are part of the setup.
For example, the Northcom commander.
But how much he knows, you know, he's probably just following along his orders.
You know, they show up.
And we have to put ourselves in their heads for a minute.
Let's go inside the head of Van Hurck for a moment.
First of all, Van Hurck is from the 509th.
And that's the same bomb group that Jesse Marcel was part of.
So that's the same intelligence apparatus.
And that's the Roswell case.
So that's a weird signature as well.
But one thing I want to say about Van Hurck let's go through his thinking for a moment.
He, as part of his training, is invited to think.
If an emergency happens and you have to take over the United States, here are the steps that you need to take.
You need to round up dissidents because we've already seen in the 70s they were making lists of people who didn't like the government's policies.
You need to grab all the resources.
You need to suspend the Constitution.
You need to grab all the private property.
You need to create vast, you know, you can get slave labor camps going in order to.
Meet the emergency.
These are all the things that they go through.
And then they also go through the training of if a nuclear bomb hits, we go back into these bunkers and we find out, you know, we grow these greenhouses and we have a new civilization and I'm the leader.
I mean, that's how the Northcom commander is trained because he's going to need that training in case this stuff happens.
So you have to go inside their mind a little bit and say, this is what that apparatus is all about.
So we should know that's where they're coming from.
Now, I'm not saying that.
He wants to do that personally.
I'm saying that's the training.
So then, the people behind the scenes who have been putting that COG system together in secrecy for years and years, that system, because it's so secret, gets exploited by this deep state group.
And we've seen throughout history, like in Iran Contra, the JFK assassination, and these other incidents.
I'm sure the 2008 coup, financial coup, dramatic, probably in relation to this COVID aspect.
I know that in the COVID case, the COG commander came out, and it was Terrence O'Shaughnessy who I reported on heavily before Esper made him retire at early age, 54, and then they installed Van Hurck.
But when COVID hit, he was everywhere.
He was on a ship in New York saying, Oh, you know, I'm inviting all these people to the bunker.
We're going to have a big meeting.
It's so big, I don't know if the bunker can handle it.
You know, I mean, this was the kind of language that we were getting from O'Shaughnessy.
And he was the NORTHCOM commander who would become the COG commander.
And there were these praise articles suddenly out of nowhere in Newsweek, which we called out.
And they were like, meet your new combatant commander.
And did you know about this group, JSOC, the Joint Services Command, who would take over Washington, D.C. if Trump gets COVID?
I mean, they were gleefully going over the anti constitutional cliff.
And then what happened was interesting because it's a loaded question, in a way.
But O'Shaughnessy was giving this guy, Arkin, William Arkin, in Newsweek, was printing these articles.
And it was saying, oh, this continuity of government, you know, deep players are saying that Trump is planning on taking over the government with COG.
It was very interesting.
I was like, oh, that's their plan.
And they're leaking that it's Trump's plan.
So I called out to Newsweek and said, actually, the person you're getting that intel from is O'Shaughnessy, isn't it?
And they freaked out.
They just flipped out beyond belief and they banned.
They blocked me on Twitter from Newsweek.
And that, you know, the writer called me all kinds of names and everything because the idea that someone was interrupting their little secret COG narrative world was a problem.
Even if it was coming directly from dark journalists, that was a problem for them.
What that tells me is this plan is acting, they're always taking the temperature and they're always floating those trial balloons to see.
What would actually happen?
That's why we should always pay attention when they float the UFO threat because they love to do that.
And this is the guy that they do that with Lou Elizondo, former Pentagon UFO official Lou Elizondo, to reveal shocking details in your book.
There's a UFO threat, and CIA Lou is going to save you.
It's not going to work like that because he's been exposed.
And we on this program, too many people are aware now the CIA is doing a threat thing.
So now they're going to change it.
And they're going to make it CIA science.
And they're going to come in through the Galileo project and do it that way.
So we have to, these are the types of things.
I mean, this is kind of the hill that we're on, watching, you know, we're kind of watching with binoculars as the stuff goes on.
Okay.
Just wanted to mention there are so many theories and ideas from, you know, Sabatis, Frankists, Archons, Ball.
This one's a good one.
Dead America.
If you don't read the papers, oh, wait, I'm sorry, different one.
Ronan returns.
My guess is that whoever the darkest deep state figures are, they are not seen but behind the scenes.
But I probably watched too much X Files back in the day.
I think there's a lot of truth to that.
Brad Briggs says Is the deep state under the influence slash control of AI, ETs, non human of some kind?
I mean, even Catherine, you know, she uses Mr. Global because she doesn't know.
Her big question is who's in charge, Mr. Global, right?
The eye of the pyramid.
So, the best minds in this field can't say.
The governance structure is a mystery, ultimately.
But I will say this, and this part is interesting, which is it seems like the group that's operating most of the chaos on Earth is a small group.
I've seen it estimated between 300 and 2,000 people.
A large body, it is a concentrated group.
So, that I found consistent throughout conversations with a number of people who've either dealt with these types of forces or have studied it for years.
It's not a large group.
So, so many of the things that they need to do, like emergency powers, gives them the power that they would need to have large majorities for.
So, this is why the emergency powers thing is so important, I think, for us to understand.
But I would agree with that.
I think a lot of it is a mystery.
Yes.
Jack, Jack, with the preparation of the cyber force, there's a preparation going on for 10 days of darkness.
We've heard this before.
Well, no.
See, this.
Forget about that.
Forget about that.
All right.
That came from, you know, the kind of David Wilcock.
There are always people trying to exploit the real stuff that's going on.
So, if we have somebody on the scale of like Professor Scott's work, then we can start to deal with the idea of a blackout.
And then we can say, oh, they might use the cyber thing to call in COG powers.
And what would that look like?
And then we can say to our representatives in Congress, hey, we know about COG.
Why aren't you calling off the emergency that was laid out on September 11th?
What's going on here?
That's worthwhile.
You know, somebody just doing a marketing thing for 10 days of darkness and stuff is useless.
So that doesn't get us anywhere.
Remember the fundamental rules involved in dark journalism.
You've got the official story, which is often put in place to save the institution or the agencies involved.
Kennedy assassination, you know, oh, this deranged communist who got a job for $1.25 an hour packing books.
Six weeks before the president drove by his window, even though he didn't know there was going to be a presidential visit, he just got a lucky shot.
And then he did a world record shooting job from a sixth floor window.
That's the official story.
No way that could have happened.
It's just the joke that they sold the public a bad job.
Then the secondary story is, and it's often called the conspiracy theory, but it is put forward by professors, writers, researchers, and they kind of slice and dice.
What happened?
They give you kind of the real hardcore piece.
And that is the Central Intelligence Agency was involved with Oswald.
Central Intelligence Agency held a tremendous amount of animosity for President Kennedy because he wanted to smash them into a thousand pieces because of their illegal activities.
They thought they controlled the government.
That's the secondary piece.
That's the real deal.
Underneath that is the junk conspiracy.
And the junk conspiracy.
You know, Jackie killed him, or is he something like that?
So, we have to be able, we need a better filter, and we need to be able to say, you know, this is junk conspiracy, this is the real deal.
So, I'm extremely open minded, you know, in terms of the forces that occur in our world and the things that take place.
And I always have been, whether it's Fortian stuff or, you know, mystery schools, supernatural, the UFO file, whatever it is.
You know, I will be very open minded about it.
But junk conspiracy, like Flat Earth, for example, things like that, they're placed there because what happens is the idea is oh, if we can make people think that anything besides that top story, the official story, is just crazy, they'll go back to the official story because it'll be like a default position.
Well, at least the official story is something, you know, logical people believe.
So those three levels of dark journalism, you know, if somebody comes.
Around and says, Aha, there's going to be a 10 days of darkness, and all the people, the bad people, will be rounded up and sent to Gitmo, and all that kind of stuff.
That's the junk conspiracy coming in and exploiting our hopes that somehow the bad people would get taken out without a fight.
And I could appreciate it.
I have hopes like that too, but I think it's better to stick to the real thing.
And, you know, that's far out enough as it is.
Yes.
Okay.
Mitukuye Oyasin, can DJ comment about the fact?
Fauci Biolabs in Ukraine seems legit via US Ukrainian embassy publication.
And Terry Doherty says, I heard that's what Putin is blowing up.
Biolabs?
Well, the only thing I think is interesting, I would refer everyone to John Rappaport did a very interesting blog entry newsletter today.
And it was all about how in Ukraine, there is, it's not bioweaponry, but there are things there that were used by like the Monsanto types, certain types, almost like fertilizer bins that are toxic, and blowing them up would really endanger the population.
So, I would refer everyone to what is his website?
It's no more fake news.com.
So, that's where he ran that.
That's a very interesting story.
I think that cuts a lot closer to the truth.
I hope there aren't biological weapons stored in there because that would be a nightmare for everyone involved.
And I don't know.
I've heard those things floated around, but it seemed to me that Rapidpour's story had some real solid foundation.
So, we'll see.
But hopefully that wouldn't happen.
Right.
It's probably a good opportunity to remind everybody of the term bug of war.
Oh, yeah.
Anything can happen.
Look, once you kind of roll tanks, it's a freak show.
That's why you should never get to that point.
And that's why allowing the situation the way Stanford Biden did to get to this point and not giving Putin reassurance that there was not going to be NATO on his doorstep probably.
Was a much better way out of this crisis.
Instead, we have this.
And so it's a dramatic failure and it gives the deep state an opportunity to exploit.
So, if anything, if we can keep that radar really clear on what's happening, I think we might be able to help the situation.
I would like to see them completely get out of the Ukraine.
So, I don't think the Russians should be in there at all.
And, you know, I don't think the people on the ground should be suffering like that.
Destroyed Environment Profits00:09:45
And I do think the United States.
Should give an assurance to Russia that we won't put NATO on their doorstep because NATO is fundamentally a kind of a hostile entity to Russia.
And so it is provocative in that sense.
There's no doubt about it.
But that doesn't justify anything that Putin did.
And his own speech today, comparing it and saying, well, the United States did the Iraq war, and it turned out to be, well, so you're going to do the same thing, you know?
It's not justification.
So But I do feel like the Washington push, the Biden administration, they want more.
They want the situation.
The media in America has been dogging Putin.
They dogged Putin in terms of his relationship with Trump.
They ruined four years of what could have been really good negotiations between two superpowers or two nuclear powers.
I wouldn't really say Russia's a superpower.
This is the other weird thing that we need to get our minds wrapped around, which is.
Russia's impact economically is incredibly.
I mean, in terms of oil, we have great dependency.
In terms of flights to space, we have incredible dependency.
But their economy is tiny compared to ours.
And their military is as well.
So let's not get into this the United States versus an equal size power on the other side.
No, it's a much smaller thing.
The fundamental understanding around Russia is that their economy, basically, their military budget, For a whole year is what we spend in a week.
So keep that in mind.
We're the ones with the trillion dollar budgets every year for wars that aren't going on.
So there's plenty of examining to do on this.
But whatever it is that's happening, the deep state is playing off.
And Russia, America, and the Ukraine all lose, in fact.
And the deep state gets a tremendous value, I think, from this.
So this is the nature of the problem, I think, with this crisis.
Yeah.
Okay, but Putin and Russia have a lot to gain from this, right?
Russia is the breadbasket of the world.
Wheat prices go up.
Ukraine is?
Ukraine is the breadbasket, yeah, of that area.
So, William Ledger says, Do you think part of Putin's calculus was German access to oil and gas?
Scarlet Fire says, Are we importing Russian oil to supply NATO to fight Russia?
And Jordan Banner says, Biden shut down the pipeline with Canada his first day, so we are without a solid supply.
This is a problem.
Well, think about it.
We're still talking about really archaic.
Forms of energy here.
I mean, we've gone very far beyond this in reality.
Those things have been suppressed when people have introduced alternative technologies, alternative energies, and things like that.
You know, some of them wind up dead.
You know, there's an X Protect just for those guys.
So, what are we really talking about?
We're talking about groups that want to hang on to the kind of oligarchy that they get from the oil profits.
And they're ready, they're moving into this green thing, but they're trying to make everybody slaves under the green banner.
And saying, oh, we can take private planes, but you can't even drive your car anymore.
But don't worry, you won't earn anything, you'll be happy.
So there's a sick thing.
And we saw the illness on display when John Kerry came out and said, look, I hope Putin, in the middle of this war, doesn't forget about his climate commitment.
I mean, it was really, dude, there are people dying on the ground.
Do you think you and your phony war on the climate is really worth inserting into this conversation?
Mr. married to the Heinz ketchup fortune.
I mean, come on, you know, this guy used to be Secretary of State.
So, I, you know, this government, the Biden, the Stepford Biden administration is a despicable government, you know, and the Secretary of State, Lincoln, is one of the worst.
I think the defense secretary, the way he dealt with his own soldiers during the COVID thing, I mean, it's horrible.
So, they need an entirely new administration.
And unfortunately, I don't even know if Biden will survive his term, you know, because he doesn't seem cognitively with it and he doesn't seem all that healthy.
But that just leaves us with Kamala.
So I don't know.
You know, it's hard to know what to root for except to get rid of them in three years.
That would be nice.
Yes.
Or sooner.
So, all right, I'm going to bring this up.
Wendy Eater, what is driving the depopulation agenda?
Because that's one thing we are sure of.
They haven't been able.
They can't control this size of the population.
And we know fundamentally in their own tracks and in the Georgia Guidestones and things like that, the population that they're looking for that they think is manageable is around 500 million.
And so the way that they dealt with it was while they were acquiring power, they were encouraging everybody, and they never mentioned the population issue or the resources issue.
And they never mentioned environmentally the kind of destruction that they were doing.
They were fattening everybody up and saying, hey, you know.
Don't even think about this stuff.
And now, what they've done on their this is the way that I see it behind the scenes, they've worked out a plan where they can lower the population dramatically and they can make a big, the most kind of impact by subjugating the entire population to a global control grid.
So, this is where they're coming from.
And so, they decided we'll do it behind the scenes for this pharma takeover and things of this nature.
That's where they're coming from.
They didn't have the open conversation in the 1980s and the 1990s saying, you know, the population is going faster than the resources and we need some balance there because they were making all the profits.
They also didn't stop and say, you know what, we all need to get green and we all need to get environmental because the thing was they were making such a good profit by destroying the environment.
You know, you think Apple was ever good for the environment?
No.
The oil companies, forget it.
You know, many of these companies were dumping a battery acid into Pure streams, you know.
So we've seen this.
Their regard for the environment is nil.
But what they see now is they're saying, aha, you know, we can introduce carbon credits.
We can make everyone dependent on the fact that we destroyed so much of the environment.
And I don't think the alternative media should shy away from the fact that the environment is in rough shape.
I know.
I wish they would talk more about the environment, right, than climate change.
But they obviously figured out that they had to create this urgency, right, and that the environment didn't do it.
Right?
You know, it's too soft.
It's too vague.
The greenhouse effect.
Well, you know, environmental degradation.
Yeah, we still, we were talking earlier in the ideas room about Fukushima still dumping radioactive waste into the Pacific, right?
Oh my God.
What is that doing to fit?
You haven't had sushi, right?
Because of that.
You know, our oceans are dying.
There are some serious problems here, but they obviously think that we can't handle the complexity of the issue, right?
Well, I think it's, yeah, it's true.
And it's deeper than that, too, which is, If we understood, we wouldn't let them destroy the environment the way that they have.
Instead, what they want to do is they want to turn it around and say, you need to pay for it in order for us to fix the environment, and you can't use anything anymore.
So you get restrained.
What they should be saying and what should happen is there should be a citizen movement saying, you know what, you guys have billions of dollars on your balance sheet, and it's just hanging out there.
You know, you should pay 10% of your profits to clean up the environment that you destroyed selling us stuff.
And that makes sense to me because they're sitting as the 1% of the 1%, and the money keeps flowing to the top.
Look at those COVID numbers.
Look what happened during the two years of the COVID crisis.
All the money went to the top.
All those billionaires got richer.
All those companies got bigger, and they destroyed small business on the ground.
This is the fact.
This is what we're living in the middle of.
So I think the way we can regain momentum is to call things out properly, not to hide from the fact that the environment's destroyed and say, like, oh, you know, The environment being destroyed is just a lie by the New World Order or whatever.
No, they have done serious damage.
Even nuclear tests have done serious damage to the environment.
They need to pay to clean it up.
And they also need to adopt strategies to lower their own pollution levels.
Look at China.
They moved all these factories from America to China because China didn't have any of the environmental regulations.
So they pumped all this junk into the air.
And their citizens got used to wearing masks.
Well, I think that's where the mask thing came here.
They were like, Well, maybe we could mask everyone around the world, not just the Chinese.
So the Chinese people are wonderful, by the way, and have given so much to culture.
And it's these governments, again, the CCP in this case, who want to do what?
They want to coup in America.
So I think this is the way we need to keep on top of it, which is not to have buzzwords or be afraid to confront the idea of the environment on the alternative side, is to call it out and call their destruction of it.
Heavy Corruption Levels00:03:19
That'll help us get a lot further with this.
Yes.
Okay.
Sandra Sword, what is going on with Sean Penn?
He's in Ukraine making a documentary and met with leadership.
Prior, he went to Haiti.
And New Orleans, Katrina, and did a story in El Chapo before he got busted.
What is the deal with Sean Penn?
Oh, this is very, very unusual.
I mean, what kind of timing is that for him to be there?
I don't know.
But I always think it's strange when things like that are involved because probably he's going to do, you know, how the Russians invaded Ukraine and CNN will run the documentary.
But I always think it's weird.
Time and place is significant.
And You know, if anything, I just wonder what kind of pre warning he was given on his way over there.
The rumor in the chat is trafficking.
I don't know.
You know, here's the thing like, I think that Hollywood has a serious, serious issue, but it's one by one.
You know, it's like I don't think that every celebrity is corrupt just by being a part of that machine, but I do feel like there's a heavy level of corruption.
And well, we know there are a lot of them are in the CIA, yes, and heavily influenced.
Well, the Central Intelligence Agency wanted to basically control their image, and Hollywood has such a level of corruption that needs to be outed on a particular level.
I think very often people spend too much time focusing on a particular celebrity, it is the actual apparatus of that system and who it's serving, um, that I think is really involved.
And of course, you know, when you look at it.
On a deep level, there's a cult association as well.
So we have to keep that in mind.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
It's X Series 120.
We're going deep, deep, deep tonight on coup de coup, COG and CIA wars, just in line with all the things that are going on in the Ukraine.
Unbelievable.
And we pray for the people there to come through this terrible time.
And I think our own participation in setting up the dynamics that led to this.
Need to be called into question dramatically.
And unfortunately, the Biden administration created a lot of this scenario, and Putin, I think, just going over the edge with this.
But we're with the people of Ukraine on this for sure, and we just hope they come through.
I want to remind you to go to darkjournalists.com and sign up for our newsletter.
That keeps us in touch with each other, and we are experiencing massive censorship.
Across the board, and somehow we just get through.
Look, Beryl just lost his channel for a week, right?
Yeah, yeah, that was really absurd too.
But I will say this that the best way for us to stay in touch really is the newsletter because it gives us the ability to talk to each other without means of a social media network.
Taiwan Border Challenges00:15:55
I like the social media networks, and I do my best to communicate with people on them.
Unfortunately, things like, as we know, Facebook and Google and all the rest.
They have some very, very dark policies related to data, and we know the deal in relation to it.
But I still think that the conversation that we're having here is the conversation that these groups are the most afraid of.
And if we can keep that momentum going and the kind of communication we have and the ideas from, that's the thing, that's the way that we create the wave.
And we're doing that here right now.
So we're going to take some more of your questions, and I have a little more on COG.
Also from the Reagan era, but I'm going to get to that later.
Can I throw a question?
Yes.
Mind Control Inc.
Does DJ think China could use this as an opportunity to invade Taiwan?
I think it's inevitable.
You know, these questions are interesting because they involve so many geopolitical factors, but I'll say this that suddenly it seems like the Biden administration is playing into that weak Ling picture.
And this is all part of the strategy, I think, to be like, oh, you know, we have an aggressor on our doorstep.
We need to really pump up our defenses and all this kind of thing.
In fact, I think when we talk about Taiwan, it's a problem for every president going in what China is going to do with it.
I think that China, both in the South China Sea and in Taiwan, have goals.
And it's just a matter of time before they make their move on that.
I noticed something, I had a headline in here.
About, let's see if I can find it.
Oh, this is one of them.
Russia vetoes UN security action on Ukraine, China abstains.
Abstain in a situation like that, where Russia has gone in and bombed the population.
I mean, you know, they're basically saying, we're with you, we just can't say it too loudly.
Biden tried to supposedly go behind the scenes and share intel with China, trying to get them to tell Russia to back off.
And instead, China shared the briefings with Russia.
So, you know, China's just playing a game for themselves.
They've become an incredible manipulator of the American system.
So the CCP, I think, is particularly dangerous.
And I think those in the government that owe their allegiance to the CCP need to be called out as well.
And some of those people, like Eric Swalwell, and I'm sure Speaker Pelosi and others, this, you know, the kind of coup style activity that we saw during the pharma crisis that we're living through with the mandates and all that stuff, so much of that has a Chinese stamp on it for the social credit system.
And I think what they're trying to do is figure out how to get the American version of that really fine tuned to Americans.
Because in China, it's a very different thing.
You know, if you say something wrong, then they can just drag you off.
You know, and that's the type of system that the Chinese have run.
It's not very enlightened.
People may have a problem with what we've developed here in America, but I'll tell you, China is not the heir to the moral throne.
And this is a big problem of it.
I think even the way that we're calling out Putin for his actions ring hollow because of what we've been up to.
So there's a kind of a moral vacuum, you would say, an ethical breach in all this.
And that Needs to be occupied or else the world devolves into chaos.
And so it ain't the Chinese who like to grab people and torture them for social media posts.
That's for damn sure.
So, the Chinese government is doing that to their own people, and the people are great.
So, you know, in our country, we have to throw off the censorship while we can.
We need to not obey the mandates, and we need to really tell this government we live under a constitution, you swore to it, and you need to fulfill that obligation.
Yes.
Shashkila is reminding us that there is a constitutional convention coming up.
Oh, that's interesting.
I actually would like to know more about the dates on that.
But the idea fundamentally of changing the Constitution with this group in powers, I don't think anybody's up for that.
And, you know, unfortunately, you know, it was interesting because we had all these justices added to the Supreme Court and people thought, hey, there's going to be good things that will come from that.
And all the Supreme Court offerings have been completely disappointing.
So, you know, they used to blame that court and say, hey, it was too liberal or whatever.
No, it doesn't matter who's on it.
Apparently, they just have to kind of play to that tune because if they don't play ball, they're not going to be there.
But I think the way we need is a kind of a middle ground to rebuild the republic.
And this is something I'm going to develop more as we go along.
But, you know, there's a lot of things that.
Have reached a point of corruption where we need to kind of move into a different system that owes more directly to the constitution that the country was founded with.
And so many people are aware of that.
And I see that great groundswell in America, but I don't see it in the establishment and those who control the media and Netflix and the entertainment world and Hollywood.
They're living in this very different world.
And that's a very controlled.
World, and they're trying to make that.
They're trying to construct that reality and tear down their enemies, those who challenge them.
So, that imbalance of power.
You know, it's interesting because I think the numbers are actually with people who think the way that we do on this, which is, you know, we need a system that adheres to the Constitution.
There's no question that the majority is there, but the ruling factors have no interest in that Constitution.
As a matter of fact, they opposed it.
Back in 1776 and 1789, when it was ratified.
And they still oppose it.
To them, it's just an anomaly, a blip.
They want to get back to being the oligarchs.
And they're getting a pretty good try.
All right, we'll take a couple more questions.
What do you got?
I wanted to follow up on this.
Chris Bradley says Russia and Ukraine are 30% of the world's grain supply, cascading food supply chain shortage.
I heard a report.
Three commercial vessels carrying grain were struck by missiles.
Moldova Navy said they couldn't confirm where the missiles came from.
From.
So it's already starting.
Oh, wow.
Incredible.
Well, this goes to show the kind of situation that we're in.
But, you know, I'll tell you something.
They're going to say, hey, there are going to be shortages and food shortages and things like that.
We already have them, right?
You've already seen empty shelves.
They already set this up.
Remember the container crisis, right?
Still not explained very well.
The inflation aspect, the food prices, they've already gone through the roof.
So, they're going to say, oh, the Ukraine did all this stuff.
No, it's already there.
It's already problematic.
And so, that to me is weird because it's a signature that they already knew that they were going to create this.
And it seems like they like talking about shipping disruptions.
It seems to me they like, you know, even when they were like, well, there's going to be pain because so much of our energy comes from that part of the world, but, you know, we'll have to put up with it.
And Americans always suffer for a better cause.
That's weird to me that they're getting into that mindset and speaking in this way.
I think, and that's Biden who did that at his press conference today as well.
I think what we're looking at there is very strange.
Because they already have, it's like they're rolling out a plan where they deprive you of energy, deprive you of food.
And there just seemed to be a certain amount of glee attached to it.
Yes.
Admiral Blake, is Putin invading Ukraine as bad as Saddam invading Kuwait?
What is the proportionate response?
No.
No, Putin really.
You know, he didn't have the right to go into the Ukraine, in my opinion, but he, we gave him a reasoning by not giving him the security assurances.
And that's what the deep state wanted because they liked the conflict.
So the things that, you know, I think he was involved in on this really, you know, it's a dark chapter for him and his own efforts.
But again, you know, Putin, there's a lot of really, there's a kind of a false thing about Putin.
Some of the villainizing of Putin and the lionizing of Putin are both very, very wrong.
Um, and they spent four years, you know, they spent all this time making him the big boogeyman in the American liberal media, and that's weird too.
They created a new Red Scare, and Hillary Clinton was like, I stand against it.
When she, you know, it was in fact Putin was way more behind her campaign than Trump's, and that's come out through different documents and different news stories.
It's just not publicized very much, as a matter of fact.
She was able to create, as Secretary of State, the biggest deal for Russia in terms of uranium mining.
And we all know that scandal very well.
So, something like 20% of their uranium comes from this deal that they made.
And then the group that did it in Russia made a huge donation to the Clinton Foundation.
That's the kind of crime that goes on publicly.
And it's loud because somehow it skirts through the law.
But so, this idea, you know, these are all postures.
And they're always looking for a boogeyman to posture against.
So, no, I don't think that this is like Saddam and Kuwait at all.
I think it's, you know, I think that it's a really bad move on this part of Putin.
And we gave him the justification by ratcheting up the idea that NATO was going to be in Ukraine.
So, if I were Putin, I would back off dramatically now before the deep state sucks you in.
And the deep state, um, at this point loves the scenario because they love war because that gives them emergency powers.
So, we have to be very careful with you know, um, the patriotism in this case, uh, is on the citizen side, demanding accountability from the government, not you know, hey, we're standing up to Russia.
Uh, and I think that for the people in the Ukraine, um, you know, we have to look at the suffering on the ground, and if anything, one of the things we can do.
As a superpower, we do our best to alleviate the suffering on the ground.
Too bad that the Biden administration didn't negotiate its way out of this.
It could have, it had the ability to do it.
I believe the CIA and the deep state were playing both sides very tough on this.
Yes?
Okay, so Ivan Langley is asking Do you think the American people will go defend the border if nothing is done?
We know that border guards and whatnot are being sent overseas to protect NATO allies on the border of Ukraine.
Oh, are you talking about the US border?
Yes, yes.
Oh, yeah.
It's just going to be completely undefended.
Well, here's the thing.
When Trump was in office, he brought out a reality about the border, which is if you have a porous border and you don't have a defended border, you don't really have a country because anybody can get in.
Now, supposedly we had all these rules about, oh, terrorists might smuggle a weapon in, but we didn't care.
Fundamentally, I think the Central Intelligence Agency and the deep state smuggle drugs through the border.
And so they don't want a lot of attention on that border because it makes them move their operations around.
So they've always made up these excuses like, oh, it's a humanitarian issue and all the rest.
I think there are some humanitarian things to be considered, but nonetheless, the country should be able to say who comes in and who doesn't.
I think that's like any country.
So what we're looking at there fundamentally is for years.
They allowed this to happen, and both sides were in on it.
Supposedly, the Republicans wanted the cheap labor, and the Democrats wanted the voters.
This is the way that they did it.
And then there were all these initiatives where illegal aliens would come in through the border, and then the Democrats would say, You can vote in elections.
So they wanted to create a base there.
So both political sides had an opportunity to exploit that.
Unfortunately, it blows all the things that they say in relation to COVID and all the rest.
Completely out the window because none of those people have had any treatment of any kind.
So that's complete, you know, if anything, it just shows how clearly hypocritical they are.
But I would say, in terms of the border, we need tough policies on the border.
And that's one thing that Trump did bring to light.
And, you know, I don't think that, you know, the wall and all that stuff, that was kind of rhetoric.
All you need is really a hardcore policy of defending the border.
And I think that we should.
Have that, and that eventually, you know, the United States could collapse from that type of burden.
So we have to be very careful about it.
There's a point in 19, from 1925 to 1965, where we no longer let anyone into the country because we felt that it needed the ability to integrate and assimilate.
Yeah, exactly.
And so I don't think it worked.
Yeah, it worked quite well.
So, I don't think overwhelming ourselves with numbers is such a good idea.
I think the country, you know, everything goes on a case by case basis, of course, but like when there are crises involving different places, I think that we are there to help at times.
So, you know, but I think that things like the caravans and stuff that they talk about, those things are organized by political groups trying to challenge the sovereignty of the United States and they're dangerous, you know, frankly.
So, I think there was a realism to the Trump policy on that, and I think that that's the way to go.
Yes.
I see a lot of lawlessness coming this year, personally, when I think about it.
You know, people taking matters into their own hands because they feel like the government isn't working for them anymore.
Too Much Individual Power00:05:51
Interesting.
There's a lot of Texans with guns.
I see them going down individually and doing their thing.
I would not be surprised in the least.
We shall see.
It's an interesting period for sure.
And I think that we're looking at maybe political questions.
The bottom line is fundamentally, we need to operate under a constitutional system, and we need law and order to be across the board.
And so, to get that, we need a lot of transparency.
And that's where a real media comes in.
That's what the alternative media can supply.
Unfortunately, you have a fake media that's manipulated by pharmaceutical companies, the deep state, the CIA, military defense contractors, so that you're not getting the real feedback.
You're not getting actual, you think you're getting it because it seems like, hey, it's news.
But as I point out, news is not like a nonprofit thing.
Those people are running on the ads.
Pfizer actually.
They're the ones who individually promote Anderson Cooper on CNN.
So he's actually, that's one thing that RFK Jr. pointed out to me.
He's actually supported by Pfizer.
So, you know, when you think of it that way, how can he ever say anything bad against them?
They'll just yank all that money that they give him.
So that's not real news, in case you didn't know.
So, you know, we're in that kind of situation, I think, where we need a real honest media network and it can actually help.
In all those other areas, because if we can have the transparency, then we can bring forward the correct political leaders, we can talk about the real things, and we can blow out the social media censorship, which is crucial because that kind of censorship is so dangerous.
And it's a very small group that's trying to do it.
Every American voice, every voice around the world should have the ability to be heard.
We earned freedom of speech through centuries of royal dictatorships, we overthrew.
You know, in America's case, we started our own thing and we earned the right to free speech.
You're not going to take it away.
You know, yes.
Do you want to mention the trucker convoy to DC at all?
There's more coming on that.
I'd like to see a little more on it, but it is interesting.
I think that the war talk took a lot of the oxygen out for the convoys.
And I think that was also useful for Biden and weaklings like Trudeau, who We were really afraid of this, and the only moves they could move.
You know, if you want to compare someone to Hitler this week, you have some contenders, but Trudeau certainly is a number one contender because those are just citizens who were protesting the policy.
Another thing I want to point out is that the person in charge of the cyber task force thing again, Averill Haynes.
Averill Haynes comes up a lot, and this has to be really acknowledged that.
Averill comes out of the Obama administration where she was the deputy CIA director to John Brennan.
Brennan, known as the drone king because of his propensity for dropping drones on wedding parties and things like that in other countries, looking for one terrorist and saying, well, we killed 50 people at that wedding party and didn't get our guy, but that's part of doing business.
These are the types of mentality that we have rolling around at the highest levels of the Central Intelligence Agency.
And although he was largely responsible for that policy, one of the things that Averill Haynes was able to do was find all these legal justifications to drone strike these individuals.
And she was part of the process of drone striking an American citizen who was overseas, who, you know, was now, they said, oh, he was a terrorist, so we were able to do it, even though he was.
Technically, an American citizen.
This is an incredible breach.
But that just shows us where she's coming from.
So she's been a real big push on the UAP threat thing.
She's in the center of all that.
And now, this office, the ASRO, that was attached, this UFO research office that was attached to the NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act, they have to answer.
That's Kirsten Gillibrand from New York.
They answer now to Averill Haynes.
So, that whole UFO threat thing again falling right into the Central Intelligence Agency's lap.
And now, what else does she have?
She has the cyber warfare task force.
So, they're answering to her.
So, there's too much power in that individual.
And, you know, she is somebody, as the director of national intelligence now, the DNI, she wields a tremendous amount of influence in that administration.
And her background shows her to be.
A corrupt dealer in intelligence working for John Brennan, who was highly questionable, lied to Congress, you know, bugged the Senate, and was known as the Drone King.
So, you know, these are the people that are in that administration.
This is part of the problem, I think, that we're looking at.
So we need to keep that in mind as we go along here.
Yes.
I just wanted to mention lawlessness was probably not the right word to use.
I meant taking the law into their own hands about Texans with guns guarding the border themselves.
I'm getting a little pushback, and I didn't make offense that way about lawlessness.
Enlightenment Era Clashes00:03:45
It wasn't a judgment.
No, no.
You actually said it correctly, which is fundamentally, it is the government's prerogative to, and we pay them to guard the border.
So the idea of taking it into your own hands is not, people may be forced to do that if it happens, but the idea fundamentally, the way the government is set up, is.
Just like, you know, we don't patrol our own neighborhoods and things because we pay for a police force.
It's the same type of idea.
So, in essence, you're absolutely right, but I know what you're saying, the spirit of it.
All right, what else you got?
Okay, this, I know nothing about this.
So, tracker 001 says, biblically, does DJ think this is Gog and Magog fighting between themselves at this time in history?
And what do you think?
Well, I think that we kind of come through a piece, an era here in the 20th century where we went through World War I and World War II, and we're supposed to move into a kind of enlightenment about war.
And instead, that enlightenment, which was starting to happen, and I think happened through the rejection of the Vietnam War ultimately as a society, even though it went on for years and years, and moving into You know, these different periods, we had the ability to move this culture in a totally different direction.
That enlightenment got subverted dramatically, and it got subverted through these entities that we're talking about, these political forces inside the deep state.
So, when you get to who they pray to and who's behind them, it gets to be a very interesting question.
Of course, that's something we study very deeply here on the show.
I would say there's an harmonic force, as Rudolf Steiner puts it, moving us into a scientific dictatorship to separate us spiritually.
And I think that's a crucial realization.
So, if we can remove that spiritual understanding and just become scientific instruments, that's the force, that's the kind of brute force world they're trying to move us into.
And juxtapose against that, I think, is this rising consciousness.
So, you're right in the middle between the two, and you're feeling the tension between the two.
And it's, you know, whenever they talk about those amazing clashes, There in the spirit realm, in the physical realm, it seems like we've moved into that period and we're starting to face off against it.
Some people might say you're facing your own shadow, and this could be as well.
And I think one of the things I like about Steiner's work is when he talks about facing Aramon, it is not running away from Aramon, it's taking it on and actually learning from the fight.
So that's what we're trying to do here.
But I recommend, I think Steiner's work now.
100 years later makes a lot more sense.
And it was like the guy was just looking forward, much like the Casey work, and seeing the things that we were going to be facing.
But it's a shame, I think, as we find ourselves looking at this war unfold, that we've gone through these major wars and still haven't learned in the grand scheme of things.
Many of us have, but that small group that is so good at manipulating.
Has so much vested in war.
Understanding Viewpoints00:02:51
And, you know, as I mentioned on the NDAA, why are we giving $800 billion to the military every year when we're not even at war?
It doesn't make any sense.
That's more money than they've ever got before.
I remember when Trump asked for a particular military budget and Congress, which is democratically controlled at the time, came back and said, hey, here's more money.
So it's not a Republican Democrat issue, but that's a fundamental thing.
Because if we keep celebrating death the way we are by supporting this military industrial defense intelligence complex, as Eisenhower warned, we must guard against it.
Well, we haven't done a very good job on that front.
All this comes down to dialogue.
So, what they've done is it's all centralization versus decentralization, but that's of thoughts, of ideologies, of ideas.
Yes.
You know, I always think about the old Oprah back in the day, don't kill me, and Phil Donahue, right?
So, well, you could talk about issues.
You could talk about issues.
Phil Donahue would have, you know, like skinheads on.
Yes.
And you wouldn't have Nazis on.
Exactly.
And you wouldn't just, you know, scream at them and call them names.
You would actually listen to them, try to understand how they arrived at their viewpoints.
People would discuss things, and it was very healthy and therapeutic.
And this culture can't heal anything because we can't talk to each other.
I just feel like, you know, where there's no discussion, there's no opportunity for healing, and that really is the core of our problem.
Oh, wow.
That's absolutely true.
So, but we can't, I mean, we can't solve the past, the sins of the past.
We can't create a new culture for ourselves.
We can't discuss our values because we're so terrified of stepping on a landmine, right?
Triggering somebody.
Oh, right.
No, that's what they've invented here.
And they invented it with the idea that no one should question our policies.
That's really where they were coming from.
And they've achieved it a lot, haven't they?
Because they've made a lot of very important issues off topic, right?
It's too hot to handle.
But we'll handle them here.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
Deep, deep, deep now into episode 120, X series episode 120.
And that is the COG coup de coup CIA wars, the worldwide impact, and the various coups that we've been through in relation to this.
I want to remind you to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for our newsletter that keeps us in touch.
And it's a free newsletter for you.
And that's something I think that's important just for us to have in case this censorship hammer comes down any harder than it already has.
Privacy Civil Liberties00:04:40
We're going to take a couple more questions here.
I'm going to read something before we do.
It's the continuity of government again.
One little piece I left out.
Well, there are two things here.
Actually, I wanted to sneak this in as well.
This is about that leak I told you where the CIA got caught grabbing all of this data and keeping track of all these citizens.
And these two senators ran it out.
So here it is, Associated Press.
The CIA has secretly conducted its own bulk program, the lawmakers wrote, and the rest of the line being redacted.
Okay, so there's something they were doing a specific type of survey.
In other words, maybe high school, no college students, for example.
It is done so entirely outside the statutory framework that Congress and the public believe govern this collection of information and without any of the judicial, congressional, or even executive branch oversight that comes with FISA collection.
They continued, referring to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Quote, this basic fact that has been kept from the public and from Congress until the PCLOB report was delivered last month.
The nature and full extent of the CIA's collection was withheld even from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
What that tells you is that the Senate Select Committee is supposed to be oversight for the CIA.
They don't care about them at all.
They had to discover this stuff on their own.
The CIA did not volunteer it because they like to do their own operations and they're extra constitutional and completely illegal, by the way.
They called for the CIA to release information on the nature of the agency's relationship with sources and the legal framework for the collection, as well as the kind of records being collected and how much of Americans' data was being maintained.
They also pressed the agency to declassify information on the rules governing the use, storage, dissemination, and queries, including U.S. person queries, of the records.
In a statement, the CIA's Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer, Christy Scott, said the agency takes its duty to protect the privacy and personal liberties of the U.S. residents seriously.
Well, obviously, you don't because you're collecting it illegally.
It's ridiculous.
Quote The CIA recognizes and takes very seriously our obligation to respect the privacy and civil liberties of U.S. persons in the conduct of our vital national security mission.
All right.
So, for example, they don't like your viewpoint.
They need to collect a profile of you and all your friends.
That's their vital thing.
And you know what?
Forget about the law because we're doing our program.
But don't worry, we'll safeguard the information.
We'll just read it ourselves and know it.
All right.
So, they don't like the dark journalists talking about COG.
Well, we'll just monitor him and all of his friends.
See how that works?
It's just whatever serves them, and then the glib way they respond to it is don't worry, we'll keep the information.
It's, you know, when that's the illegal part.
Not just safeguarding it, but, you know, conducting the surveillance in the first place.
Totally illegal.
Scott said, Scott went further CIA is committed to transparency consistent with our obligation to protect intelligence sources and methods.
According to the report, recommendations declassified by the CIA, agency analysts using the Program that looks for information related to U.S. persons are warned by a pop up box that doing so requires a foreign intelligence purpose.
However, the program does not require analysts to provide a justification for their search according to the recommendations, which urge the agency to require them to do so.
In a statement following the declassification of the redacted letter and recommendations, Senator Wyden and Heinrich noted that FISA had received scrutiny in the past.
Quote But what these documents demonstrate is that many of the same concerns that Americans have about their Privacy and civil liberties also apply to how the CIA collects and handles information under executive order outside the FISA law.
In particular, these documents reveal serious problems associated with warrantless backdoor searches of Americans, the same issue that generated bipartisan concerns in the FISA context when they were doing that during the 9 11 period.
So they just developed this program.
They won't say what it is.
They grabbed all this information that's completely illegal and they neglected when the warnings came up and said, Oh, you can only do this to a foreign individual using FISA.
You can't do that to American citizens.
Global Continuity of Government00:04:51
Screw that.
We're just going to collect this information anyway.
By the way, doing that and having that come out is interesting timing.
But doing it before this Ukrainian thing is quite wild because some of the strangeness that we've seen in terms of promoting Biden, there's been a lot of bots out there promoting Biden and saying, you know, Stepford Biden has my vote for standing up to those Russians and all that stuff.
The weirdest array of those bots.
Has them saying, I would gladly be drafted by Stepford Biden for this battle.
Think about that.
What is it that they're planning?
Where are those bots coming from?
And they're around.
Those are the types of questions I think that take us deeper into the heart of what we're talking about.
Okay, two more questions, Miss Olivia.
Jack, Jack, what is the role of COG when the Queen dies?
How can it affect the world?
Well, technically, COG is an American construct about the American government.
That's the continuity of government.
Now, what they're doing is it's going global.
So, the COG rules again suspend the Constitution of the United States in the case of an emergency, whatever they deem an emergency.
And they tried to, they were considering with, I mean, with COVID, they got away with so much martial law, right?
They made people do things, they made them stay in their house, all that stuff.
That's completely unconstitutional and completely illegal, but they were able to do it through an emergency rule.
So, continuity of government is the next level of that.
It divides the country through Northcom taking over, and they set up regional governors, and Van Hurck becomes the leader of America.
So, the type of incidents that it would take normally to activate something like COG would be a nuclear attack, for example, which decapitated the head of the government.
So, even under a nuclear attack, a president is supposed to stay in power.
So, they changed the rules just before 9 11 and they made it any emergency, not just a nuclear emergency.
So, now how did they define emergency?
Could that be a cyber attack?
Would that be the emergency that would trigger COG?
And it would be like, oh, Stepard Biden's too old.
Let him step down and we'll put this General Van Herk in.
He can run the United States.
Well, after seeing Canada, Activate their emergency powers, even for a short term, there, those powers have never been activated.
His dad, Trudeau's dad, well, supposed dad, activated a different emergency plan, oddly enough, in 1972, but this one has never been activated.
So I have a feeling there was a reason they were like, this is the opportunity.
You know, we have a rare opportunity to try it.
You can just picture Christy of Freeland kind of, you know, getting really greedy and excited to try this out against her fellow citizens.
But in terms of the Queen dying, there's no specific rules about COG that would be activated for that.
They just have a normal succession like they do over there.
But there are circumstances under which their emergency powers could be activated.
And what I've been seeing, and we saw it with Canada, which is they're acting like the continuity of government canary in the coal mine.
Yes.
Yeah, Jack Jack says US Northcom includes Canada.
Yes, but that's true.
But he was talking about the Queen.
Right.
And the Queen is considered.
True.
But the idea is that the Queen is not, you know, she's the titular head, but there's a whole government apparatus running Canada out of the UK.
So the way I would look at that is you're not going to see, you know, it's not going to be the death of a person that's going to activate COG.
COG is an emergency.
And remember what they love, they love emergency powers.
What have they been hitting us over the head with?
Ever since this thing started, cyber emergency, right?
The cyber hack that would make an emergency.
That's where they're going.
This is the thing I think we can head off at the past by being aware of it.
Yes.
What else you got?
Black Zionist.
Ask DJ, does he remember Jade Helm and what that was about?
You know, I did an interview with the late Jim Mars that's still on this channel.
And they took down a lot of Jim Mars, my interviews with Jim Mars.
But that one's still there.
Secret System of Power00:05:48
And, you know, it was really interesting.
Basically, my conclusion on Jade Helm back in the day was that it was some kind of large scale AI exercise.
And I think there were good details being floated around by some researchers at the time that they wanted the response action to what it would look like when a military group took over a city.
And that's what the drill was all about.
And I think it was hyped, and that some people had a huge knee jerk reaction.
Like the InfoWars type thing.
And I could appreciate it.
But also, you know, it got into like a fear porn level with it.
So it was really over the top for a certain point there.
But the idea is for real.
And the idea that we've seen them, even when they rolled the National Guard tanks during early COVID, we've seen that they wanted to use the military in a role there.
And then, when they were having all the difficulties with the healthcare workers who were saying, We're not going to get vaccinated until we know more details about this thing in order to keep our jobs.
And they said in New York, the governor there, she said, Well, you're out.
You're fired.
And I'm installing all these National Guard people for your position.
Well, good luck with that.
You know, yeah, the National Guard people have some training, but will they have the expert health training?
So this thing wasn't about keeping people healthy.
It was about getting them to obey these mandates.
And so, National Guard.
FEMA, these are the organizations that they can tap to exercise those powers.
And certainly, FEMA is another one which is hand in glove with continuity of government, but it's supposed to respond to natural disasters.
And fundamentally, just like all these things would have their normal function, continuity of government, you would think, hey, it's good.
Originally, Eisenhower set it up and said, if we get nuked, we need a secondary government.
But instead, what happened is we have large scale underground bases.
That runs a completely different style of government.
And we don't know about that world.
And we can't even track where its finances go because it's too secret.
So that's a secret system of finance.
It's a secret system of power.
We just don't know what it is.
But we know that it has total authority over the United States in an emergency.
That much is stated as fact.
And that's in our government understanding.
Continuity of government takes over in the case of an emergency.
Well, I have a big problem with that.
And I remember there was a story that during the Vietnam War, they went back and they looked through and they were like, can we call an emergency over some of the things that are happening?
And they looked in there and they were like, oh my God, there's still a state of emergency from the Korean War.
We forgot to shut it off.
Somebody's been exploiting that.
So, you know, these are the types of things that we need to call out.
I can tell you this for a fact.
And, you know, they're.
There's many people in Congress who know this.
Professor Scott has pointed it out.
We're still under the September 11th emergency.
Certain aspects of the Constitution are technically suspended as I speak to you right now.
That's an intolerable situation.
So it takes the legislative branch to remedy that.
And it takes the president not signing the NDAA September 11th emergency attack function in there.
So this is what it comes down to.
This is something that we do need to be aware of because we've seen them exploiting the emergency.
Powers.
Otherwise, it would be so obscure that it would be like, ah, who cares about it?
It would never happen.
But when you see Canada pressing the button and saying, hey, if I get in trouble with protesters, little Justin has to make sure that those truckers don't expose them, then he can call in a bunch of thugs and they wrap up their money and punch them around, push them around, throw them in jail, whatever.
That's just one small thuggery aspect of emergency powers.
There's such an affront to regular constitutional rule.
That we need to keep it front and center.
Yes.
It's probably too late to really do anything about it, but what's happening with the school boards is what needs to happen nationally, right?
That's good.
Yes.
Like regular people.
This was supposed to be a government by the people, right?
And they would serve, whether you're a dentist or a doctor or an engineer or whatever, you'd go and you'd serve.
And what we realized is that the political class cannot be trusted, they're all corrupted.
Unfortunately.
Yeah, and we have real people in there who really care.
There's no question about it.
I mean, there's a few exceptions.
There's guys like Rand Paul, you know, who I think have their head on straight in terms of certain issues.
But by and large, the governing structure is corrupt, and that's where you get to this point.
Can that situation be saved or remedied?
Absolutely.
There's no question about it.
That's what we're doing here by bringing that focus through.
Yes.
What else you got?
Jordan Banner says Okay, so what does DJ think caused Trudeau to pull back?
They probably told him, Hey, you know, we're doing this Ukraine thing.
Take the center spotlight off yourself, anyway.
You look terrible doing this.
We can't expose our whole plan about emergencies yet.
Bad move.
Well, they were going to call for a no confidence vote, right?
He had to save his job.
I would say it's pretty much the Ukraine thing was coming in, and they knew.
Shock Awe Setbacks00:04:34
They were like, okay.
I also think that you have to remember this there are groups inside that control the world structure that are coming from different places.
So, like, Part of that group was embarrassed by, say, W. Bush's invasion of Iraq and the cowboy diplomacy.
The Bill Moyers types, who sat on the top of the Council on Foreign Relations, they want the culture to change and be under a one world government, but they don't want it to be obvious that this is what they're doing, and they don't want the fascist tendency to be there.
So, you know, Bush embarrassed them to a certain degree.
You know, the Obama thing, they could move in.
You know, we're taking over Libya, we're doing all this stuff, but we're doing it with a smile.
And, you know, we're still the clanker for the banks of the war machine.
So, you know, Obama, in a way, is one of the biggest disappointments of all because he came in on the whole, you know, people's pride tab.
You know, they came in with the idea that this is somebody who's going to be for the people.
And he instantly, the first things that he did, you know, In making Hillary Secretary of State and in getting Lawrence Summers, the guy who caused all the financial coup d'etat from Harvard, he gets him in as his top consultant financially, you know, and all the Goldman Sachs people.
I mean, Obama was really, he was as two faced as they come.
And Biden is kind of continuing that Obama legacy.
But it is interesting when you get right down to it.
They don't want to be, one of them wants to be subtle about it.
And the other one, like the Klaus Schwab thing, is more like hit them with shock and awe.
They won't be able to stand it.
Trust me on that.
You know, like somebody's feeding them this information that if they really come after us, that we'll be so bedazzled, we won't be able to do anything about it.
That's what they did with COVID.
And, you know, in some ways that worked.
But just like the, you know, there's a famous case where, The Soviets do shock and awe.
I mean, the Nazis do shock and awe against the Soviets, and they get right to the gates of Moscow within six weeks.
It's amazing.
But then they get hit with the winner.
And, you know, little by little, they start setback, setback.
Stalingrad happens.
And, you know, it's the overreach.
And it's just like Hitler when he takes, I'm going to take on the Russians and the British.
You know, I'll be fighting both sides.
They get into a mania and they overreach.
And there are aspects of that COVID thing that overreach that almost tumbled the whole thing.
And they're still playing with that.
And Fauci is one of those key psychos in the middle of it.
Yeah.
That's a really good point.
Is that the thing that we can possibly depend on is the mania, you know, that they will, yes, they'll become so emboldened that they will make a mistake, a fatal mistake.
Yes, excellent point.
All right, last question.
Last question.
Didn't Edgar Cayce have predictions of Russia and World War III?
Well, it's interesting because Cayce held out that the friendship between the United States and And Russia would be one of the most important things when and if it would happen.
And, you know, he related very high hopes for what would happen with this.
And he also said that through Russia would come the hope of the world.
Think about that.
I mean, it was kind of a far off thing.
We don't know what it means.
And certainly isn't the kind of war that they're bringing down on their neighbors in Ukraine.
This vision for them being the hope of the world.
He also said that someday China would be the cradle of Christianity, way off in the distance.
So these are interesting pieces.
But you know, one of the big things that Casey mentioned in terms of the world affairs readings was that the general fight in America, ultimately, the revolution that would tear it apart or bring it together was the difference between capital and labor.
Capital Labor Attitudes00:03:38
It's the attitude of capital to labor.
And this is simply the corporations versus the average people now.
This is where the battle is.
And those corporations get together at Davos and figure out how to round up and limit the citizens' rights.
That's what they do.
That's what the World Economic Forum is all about.
That's what the deep state is doing in Ukraine.
It's the people on the ground that are suffering through this, through their chess moves.
Oh, it was a master chess move.
No, it's not a master chess move.
You just killed thousands of people.
Sick.
So, you know, there needs to be a realization.
I think the realization on the ground with people.
This is the problem.
I think that people are waking up, and I think the structure on top is a heavy weight.
And I think also the structure on top is upside down.
The people that have risen to positions of influence, like Zuckerberg and these types of people, they don't have any real internal development.
They don't seem to possess a lot of character.
They seem unethical by nature.
Gates, these are not.
Very advanced people.
They've just gotten good at one good material thing.
That's not enough.
Go into that for a minute because I think a lot of this comes from easy lives.
Yes, living in mansions.
Yeah, not even just as adults, but just, you know, they had kind of easy childhoods.
Oftentimes they're children of, you know, elites, if we want to use that term.
They're just soft, right?
Yes.
You know, I think about, I immediately thought of Kennedy and how he had.
Physical problems, how Roosevelt had physical problems.
Yes.
And that this gave them extra empathy and character.
You know, not perfect people by any means, but, you know, they were both elites.
They both came from wealthy families, but they had more in common with the everyday man who has suffered.
They knew suffering.
No, they understood.
Yeah, they did.
It's an excellent point.
They had a great feeling for their fellow human.
This is the thing.
And they understood the idea of freedom.
And both of them were able to enact policies that changed the world dramatically for the common person.
Even though they came from these elite environments, they had an obligation to make the world a better place.
And this is really an incredible thing.
And I think when I think of Kennedy in particular, he understood people were made to be free and independent.
And that's why all those people in government were like, what are you doing?
Because you're giving all their powers back, you know, and ultimately, I think they just looked at him and said, We have to get rid of him because, you know, he wants to bring the culture forward.
We just want to move ourselves forward, you know, and this is the nature of it.
FDR, in many ways, too, and I think many aspects of his presidency shine for that in a way that a guy like Hoover didn't, you know.
But it is amazing when we get these opportunities to bring through these incredible visions.
Also, we have to remember that FDR's vice president, Henry Wallace, was what?
He was a theosophist and a huge spiritualist who understood the mystery schools incredibly well.
So, you know, there is that aspect of sometimes the ex share types, the knowledgeable people from the mystery schools, come into the political process.
Thank You and Next Week00:11:29
And this is maybe something, you know, maybe deep in that political mind.
You know, there's the possibility, the action, something better might come forward supported by those mystery traditions.
And that's, I think, something that we're very much looking forward to.
And with that, we're going to wrap up our broadcast tonight.
Miss Olivia, what do you got?
I just wanted to say, Kontiki Man says NBC News just brought out a story about Biden examining legal issues delivering weapons to Ukraine.
Oh, interesting.
Okay, good.
That is breaking.
What about Hunter?
I didn't even get into Hunter.
He's the worst lethal weapon you got.
Unbelievable.
Yes.
Okay.
We have a lot of super chatters to thank.
So, Eurythmias Fun, a cult fan, and Gummy Bears, Debbie McAdoo, Bob Bindert, Jim Sargent, 3ID, Jorian Hewitt, Paige Sparks, Gil and Joy R., Stacey Chiuli, Catherine Amelia, Animal Black, Vern Baumgardner, Michael Souter, Rostermind the Seer, David Gilker, Global Atlantis, Jody Z., Tricky Vicky, Daniel Hinckley, Robert Mathurin, Max Jeterman,
And it helps us to deliver these reports for you and makes all the difference.
And so thank you.
And thank you to our subscribers for keeping us going.
And we're going to make 2022 just the best yet.
Wait till you hear about the things we have coming up incredible interviews.
Of course, we have the new interviews with Catherine Austin Fitz out.
We have some more remarkable interviews coming up.
You want to give a hint about who you got the contact with this past week?
Nope.
No, I'm going to save it.
Good point.
I'm going to save it.
But we have some remarkable people coming on board and some great X Series episodes coming up for you, as well as documentaries and events coming up this year.
I also want to mention that it's going to be the fourth anniversary of the X Series in the middle of March coming up here.
So we're going to do a very special two part episode for you.
And I'll be looking forward to doing that.
In terms of the people in the Ukraine and the situation there, let's just keep our hearts with them and keep our eyes open for a better outcome and hoping all the aggressive sides withdraw from there and let the people just live their lives.
And we'll do our best with that.
Yes.
Can I throw you on?
Okay.
Frank Torres says DJ, what's your take on the lawyers quitting the Trump case?
This is important.
There was a trumped up case against the Trump business interests in New York because they're really worried about him running in 2024.
And so they had the attorney general of New York pressing this case, and two of the lead prosecutors just quit because they've realized, oh, this is just a political maneuver.
And they're trying to maneuver Hillary to run again.
And I'm sure with her New York connections, she's part of that.
But the two prosecutors quitting pretty much means that the case is in the dirt.
And I don't even know that Trump is the best person for the 2024 Republican slot.
There's a lot to be seen there.
And he also, I think, needs to come to terms with some of the Push around warp speed and all that stuff.
And I think he needs to reconcile some of those things.
But certainly he's brought forward some very, very important political positions.
And I think that there are voices out there.
We need something new beyond the Democrat, Republican voices.
I'd like to see something totally new emerging here in 2022 that can go into that 2024 race and maybe bring something.
Listen to Mira.
Oh, don't do that one.
But thank you so much, everyone.
I'm going to do a couple of shout outs here.
Incredible crowd tonight.
Boy, your questions just blew me away.
Someone said DeSantis 2024.
Well, Florida's in the hot zone.
Listen, hot zone presidencies.
I wouldn't be surprised at all.
Bill Clinton is home watching HBO, huh?
Hilarious.
Roosevelt News.
Fantastic.
Great to see you.
Occult fan.
Hey, there's my new.
I can highlight the Occult fan.
There he goes.
Ex Mark.
The spot, ex march the spot.
I like it.
Shout out, I missed that one.
Where is it?
Guzzle of Oz, Adam Hugel, Mike Brady, Najat, RFK Jr. for president.
I would vote for RFK Jr.
I would too.
Uh, yeah, RFK Jr. is coming up with a show pretty soon.
Uh, Liddy Lou, let's see, excellent.
Brandy Renee, Steiner de Gaud.
There you are.
Shout out indeed.
May the love that you put out, oh, this thing is moving so fast, return to you a thousandfold.
I like that.
I like that.
That's really what it's all about.
Scarlet Fire gets a good quote.
Amazing quotes.
Cat Goida, thank you so much.
I salute you.
Thank you so much for helping us out tonight.
And Moments Divine.
Oh, we have everybody out there.
Golden Girl.
The Cove Channel.
Love you, DJ.
Ad Astra.
Per Adua, Ad Astra, through difficulty, through the stars, to the stars.
Kate, we got Kate out there.
It's great to see you.
Chrissy's out there and she was talking about using smudging with Palo Santo.
Oh, what a great idea.
It's a great idea.
Good one.
Fantastic.
Chrissy's always the best.
Summer Girl, Nick Malone, Uniparty.
Yes.
I think that's exactly.
That's really where it's at.
How else do we got out there?
Marta, Frank Monday, Esoteric Gold.
Wow.
Great crew tonight in the ideas room.
The questions were off the charts.
Marty Ross, it's almost tomorrow, Boston time.
I know.
God, we got through the storm too.
Ron Frey, the state of the nation would take three weeks if I was president.
If he was president.
Oh, that's good.
I'd have some very interesting policies, that is for sure.
What else we got?
Billy Bob Jones, thank you.
Thank you for being out there.
All right, new comments.
I'll do a couple more.
Thank you, DJ.
Joe Sampson.
Thank you, Joe.
Thank you for joining us.
Debbie McAdoo, outstanding.
Rogan already got his 200 million.
He doesn't need to be president.
We are the dark journalist crew.
Oh, I love when the stuff moves fast.
Have a great start to your weekend, everyone.
Yes, Ronan Returns gets it.
It's the weekend.
Everyone's going to have a fantastic weekend.
Yeah, Catherine Austin fits for president.
Yes, but she doesn't want the job, but she would be outstanding.
She'd lock up the right ones, that's for sure.
The job, it's great to see you.
Luke Walker, Medley Childress, Thomas Tyson, Al Kyder.
Saturday, 4 20 p.m. there.
Wow.
Is that Australia?
How about that?
Amazing.
Where would it be 420?
I think it's in Europe, isn't it?
But it's 420 p.m.
It's like 15 hours ahead.
No, it's only five hours ahead there.
Unbelievable.
Oh, I see what you're saying.
Chrissy.
Let's see.
Chrissy gets the last word.
Might I suggest some Honey Mama's chocolate at the end of the day heals the hearts?
Unbelievable.
Chrissy always nails it.
Jake Mutter, UK.
We love you, UK.
Outstanding.
Thank you so much.
Thanks, everyone, for being with us tonight.
It's a tough, difficult time, and the subjects are tough, but we're all in there together working these ideas out.
And I think getting that transparency and the real conversation going.
I highly recommend a couple of books here, of course, classics, but American Deep State, Professor Peter Dale Scott.
Unbelievable insights there.
May Brussels, Fascism in America.
Really crucial book if you haven't read it.
And this one, of course, if you want the whole setup, Project Paperclip.
That's really Clarence Lasby.
Just unbelievable reading.
And this one might be hard to get, but the other two I know are around.
And anything by Professor Scott, I would say, including Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, it's just we go into a whole different zone.
We will see you all next week.
And Michael Humphrey, do you think Hillary will see justice?
She tries to run again.
They might, they just might open up some very interesting things on her because she has so many skeletons in her closet.
It's unbelievable.
It would be crazy if they ran her again.
Which one is that?
Has DJ read Christopher Fulton's book?
What's the title of the book?
I would like to know what that is.
Very interesting.
Bart Siebril, isn't he the We Never Went to the Moon guy?
I think that's who that is.
Let me know.
Mike Brady?
How about fascism in the NBA?
Interesting, really interesting topic.
Huh.
Yeah.
Well, I have some very interesting sports stuff coming up.
Believe it or not, there is an edge there.
And Gigi Young just might be involved.
Everyone, thank you so much.
We will leave you for this weekend.
You know, it says end broadcast, but it never really ends.
Remember to go to darkjournalist.com if you haven't already.
Sign up for our free newsletter that keeps us in touch.
And we'll be back with you next Friday for X Series 121.
I do want to say there might be some special broadcasts as breaking news, hits, and things like that.
I've been watching things closely.
So we'll be right there with you.
But thanks so much for being with us, and we will see you next week.
Miss Olivia, bravo.
Bravo.
Thanks.
This was really fun tonight.
I've been obviously very concerned and kind of obsessed with the news.
So this was a nice relief to be with friends.
And yeah.
You did a great job.
I love that.
Outstanding.
Unbelievable.
And everyone's really glad to have you.
Thank you so much, Ruth.
Love and peace.
Shamaness Anamkara.
That will carry us through.
We'll see you all next week, everyone, if not sooner.