Dr. Joseph Farrell and Daniel Liszt dissect the 2024 US election as a "Deep State" coup involving an "October Surprise," alleging social media deplatforming to suppress evidence of Biden's lies. They connect this to a global financial reset via digital currencies, transhumanist agendas by Bill Gates and Elon Musk, and alleged bioelectrical vaccines designed for mind manipulation. The discussion expands to hidden bearer bonds featuring JFK, Antarctic Atlantean ruins visited by royalty, and a faction potentially aligned with Trump ready to confront extraterrestrial overlords using advanced weaponry rather than paying tribute. Ultimately, the episode frames current events as a critical phase transition where suppressed truths about cosmic entities and financial fraud demand public resistance against silencing forces. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
The End of the Beginning00:03:34
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalists.
It's great to be here with everyone.
It's an amazing crowd already.
And of course, I'm joined by the lovely Olivia.
Hi, everybody.
We have a very special guest tonight, which is Dr. Joseph Farrell.
Joseph, it's great to see you.
There he is.
Joseph, are you out there?
Can you hear me, Joseph?
Hello, Daniel.
I'm trying to get rid of my echo.
Ah, I think it's probably your browser, sir.
Can you hear me?
You're fine coming in through, but if you have a second window open, just shut the audio on the window up.
Yeah, okay.
I did that.
So, all right, we're good now.
You sound great over here.
Okay, good.
Well, you sound great too.
How's it going?
It's, well, since we're in the selection, it's going about, you know, I feel like I'm watching a Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoon.
Because we've got Trump, you know, hey Rocky, watch while I pull a rabbit out of my hat again, you know.
And then we have whatever Biden is, it's like Spock's brain Biden, you know, they're moving them around.
It's just unbelievable.
I mean, talk about theater.
I mean, they had George Stephanopoulos with him in a kind of a town hall thing last night on ABC, and he was like, How does it feel to have given so much to so many for so long?
Not borrowing any words from Winston Churchill, George.
This is the end of the beginning.
I have nothing to offer you but sleep and more sleep.
We shall sleep on the beaches.
We shall sleep in the towns.
And we shall never surrender the selection.
And we shall never surrender while we sleep.
I'll tell you, they haven't given him shock treatments or something when he goes into the city.
You gotta love those cherry tongue suppressors.
Yeah.
It's just unbelievable.
It's pretty amazing.
It's pretty amazing.
And when he goes to an area in Michigan or Florida, nobody shows up.
I mean, nobody.
Yeah, I've seen that.
You know, I watched some lady reporter out in Arizona covering some event that he was supposed to speak at, and nobody zero goose eggs.
This tells us a lot.
Yeah, and he's ahead by 15 points.
Okay, really?
It's pretty amazing.
And then you see, you know, Trump with the stadiums, and supposedly it's like, oh, he can't get above 39%.
Yeah, I just, you know, I don't know what kind of math they're doing anymore.
But, you know, for one thing, it disturbs me, Daniel, that it appears that the polls are so badly, badly obfuscated.
Oh, yeah.
Geopolitical Power Base Shifts00:15:16
That they're simply untrustworthy.
And I think that's part of some sort of op because.
Both sides have been prepping this narrative for several months now that there's going to be a contested election, and we may not know who's really the president until January.
Right.
You know, and that gives me great pause because this whole COVID thing, this election cycle is occurring right at the same time that these people are talking about major financial resets.
We're watching a huge geopolitical realignment taking place just in the last two months vis a vis China.
So, you know, the problem is they're going to try and, well, Catherine put it very well.
They're trying to keep the.
The dollar system going just long enough till they can roll out their new digital currency, which isn't a currency.
But they're trying to do this, but the fly in the ointment is China.
Yes.
So, you know, I'm waiting with bated breath as to how they're going to do all of this if China's not on board.
And it looks to me like they don't want China on board as currently constituted.
Yes.
Well, this is where the conversation goes, really, because behind the scenes there, Whether it's the South China Sea or anything along this line, even the Wuhan virus, that is all part of this kind of new friction with China.
And it's interesting to think that China's become such a power base in all of this that we're facing off against them in a number of ways.
And you've said it's actually a covert war going on there.
Yeah, I think so.
I think that if you look at the flooding that's occurred there, if you look at this new geopolitical alignment, which The public pundits are calling the Quad.
I've been calling it the Quadruple Entente.
And they're talking about Japan, India, Australia, and the United States as part of this block.
I've been adamant thinking that Russia's the hidden part of it.
Interesting.
And the reason why is if you look at what Mr. Putin has been doing, rather than what he's saying, you know, come on, folks, this is Russia we're talking about.
This is a standard game going back to Catherine the Great.
You know, watch what we do, not what we say.
Yeah.
But if you look at what Russia's been doing rather than what Russia's been saying, the first thing that caught my eye was when Putin suspended a delivery of the Russian S 400 surface to air missile defense system to China and turned right around and went through with a delivery to India, right as all of these border problems with China were taking place.
And then he moved several missile batteries into Siberia.
And something tells me he's not afraid of Japan.
So, you know, what he has been doing.
And then India turned around and gave Russia a $1.2 billion line of credit or some enormous amount of money.
And I strongly suspect, Daniel, that some of that may have come from Washington.
And it's just being laundered through New Delhi to bypass the sanctions regime.
So, you know, I think there's something going on.
Russia's going to try and play the middleman between this emerging bloc.
And then just this last week, I did my news and views on France and what Emmanuel Macron has been proposing.
He wants an actual alliance with India and Australia against China.
So, you know, we're looking at this anti Chinese bloc emerging.
And I think the reason why is that they've finally realized in all of their infinite. Globaloniist wisdom that having China as a partner is a rather dubious enterprise if you want to run the world, because China wants to run it.
Macron shows up as a little more savvy than I think people gave him credit for when he first came out.
Well, yeah, I mean, he's savvy in the geopolitical sense, not the cultural one.
I mean, it takes real stupidity to stand up at the Verdun Battlefield Memorial and say there's no such thing as French culture.
You know, that takes real big brass ones to rub it in the face of your fellow Frenchmen like that.
He also was in big trouble with all the riots that were going on just before COVID.
It's almost like COVID actually rescued his leadership.
Well, that's the painting that we're getting in the media over here, which hasn't been covering it.
But from what people are telling me in Europe, they're still going on.
And the French electorate is still very unhappy with them.
Gosh, go figure.
I can't imagine why.
But.
But, you know, there's so much going on with this that this whole election, to me, you're watching both of those D state factions that were present in the 2016 election.
They're out in force, it looks like.
And it's an even bloodier war this time.
Oh, yeah, yeah, very.
Let's talk about some of the manifestations around that.
In the last 24, 48 hours, we've seen a massive deplatforming of all kinds of different.
Independent voices and even a deplatforming of the New York Post, which is one of the oldest newspapers in America, by Twitter and Facebook also limiting it, but Twitter really being the point man on that and just preventing people from sharing it.
And what I found really fascinating about what they were doing, the New York Post had this story about Joe Biden's son and this laptop that had been discovered and that he had abandoned at some computer shop, and then somehow Rudy Giuliani got his hands on it.
Yeah, somehow.
That's pretty good.
I noticed Steve Bannon showed up in there too.
But it's quite a network.
But in any case, it looks like they have the real deal.
And they were about to basically burn the Biden campaign because he had said repeatedly, no, I didn't know anything about what my son was doing.
This disproved it and made Biden look like a liar at the very least.
Right.
If not a profiteer and doing illegal transactions that they were trying to impeach Trump for over years.
So that was a big deal, and they stopped it.
They just stopped the story.
The New York Post went full with it.
Twitter stopped it.
Facebook stopped it.
And then, you know, so there are all these.
This is a war when you come out that front from and you deplatform all these voices, but then you go after the New York Post.
That's really hardcore.
Yeah, that's very, very hardcore.
And, you know, as far as I'm concerned, you know, you only take flack when you're over the target.
Yes.
And, you know, I think that this effort to try and save Mr. Biden, who's running.
Some sort of bizarre campaign.
A friend of mine put it to me very bluntly, and I have to agree with him that we're watching the Democratic Party fall on its sword and commit political suicide.
And being from South Dakota, I remember Senator McGovern very vividly.
He was my senator, along with Carl Munt when I was a boy.
Oh, yeah.
And McGovern was just plain stark raving nuts.
Oh, we're watching a coup election.
Yeah, yeah.
And we're watching something that is way beyond anything George McGovern ever dreamed in terms of nuttiness.
And I have to wonder, you know, why are we watching this very self evident destruction of a major political party unless they've been ordered to fall on their swords?
Yes.
You know, having rallies that no one shows up to.
Not out on the campaign trail, and when he is on the campaign trail, he's met with all these Trump people.
So, I have to wonder what's going on there.
And then the in your face polling numbers, which are to me, they seem to be so inflated in his favor, at least the ones you hear about.
And then the sudden deplatforming.
I mean, yeah, you're right.
This is a full on, full court press, and they're making war on.
The American people in a certain way, and you know, it's gone violent.
Yeah, so you have to wonder what the agenda is.
And I'll be very honest here, Daniel.
I'm when we were talking before the show, I mentioned that I was thinking in terms of the beer hall putsch, yes, 1923.
And the way that people learn that in history is completely wrong.
Because what they are told, or the way that the event is covered in the history books, at least back when I was teaching, if they even cover it anymore, that's another question.
But back when I was teaching, the impression that the textbook gave was that the Nazis were trying to take control of the state government of Bavaria in Germany and to launch their movement.
Well, this is not true.
What the Nazis were doing, what Hitler was doing, Was that the communists had already seized power in Bavaria and dismissed, and even in a couple of cases, executed some Bavarian state ministers?
And the platform that the communists wanted to put through was to separate Bavaria from the rest of Germany again and make it its own independent entity, like it had been prior to the Franco Prussian War when it was integrated into the German Empire.
What the Nazis were trying to do was prevent that because it was, from their point of view, much easier to seize power in all of Germany rather than to have to go state by state and impose their rule that way.
And look what we have in this country right now.
We have secessionist movements in many of the blue states.
Now there's a movement in New York to break up New York State into three autonomous zones.
So, that they can get rid of the central power of Albany and let the conservative areas of New York not be dominated by Albany and New York City.
So, you have these secessionist movements in the blue states, which, in part, I think, are so that if the country cracks up, they can walk away from all their federal obligations.
Yes.
And the counter moves here would be exactly as it was in Germany a right wing backlash against that.
Mm hmm.
And that's what we see going on on the right in this country.
So, I'm as nervous about what's going on on the right in terms of an implied reaction to all of this as I am to what's been going on on the radical left side with all the rioting and looting.
In other words, this is a very, very precarious situation that we're in.
I can't emphasize that strongly enough.
It's very precarious.
Well, absolutely.
And you're moving into that deep state Civil War meme.
Yes.
This whole election could be seen through that lens.
Yes.
That this is what it's for.
And the reason, the outcome is in the ashes of that, the deep state forces, which we'll talk about tonight, can come in and sort of make their deep state profit, picking up the ashes and rebuilding the whole thing as the new smart city world.
The target right now is the USA.
Yeah, the target seems to be the USA.
And here's the other problem, Daniel, the way I'm reading it, I don't know about you.
Is that Mr. Globaloni, and I mentioned this with Catherine a week ago.
I think that Mr. Globaloni has so crossed some sort of economic, financial threshold that none of their modeling works anymore.
Because it's conventional, and they've crossed some sort of threshold where none of the modeling is able to accurately predict things.
And this is why we see the confusion on the part of Mr. Globaloni.
Part of Mr. Globaloni is backing Trump.
Because they realized that they needed to reshore industry into North America, which is their power base, otherwise they could lose the whole shebang.
Yes.
And, you know, so we've got that factor going, and they want this financial reset, the digital currencies, and so on and so forth, which they would not be able to do unless their power base in North America is secure.
But on the other hand, they are faced with so many obligations that the other faction of Mr. Global only literally does want to split the country.
So, if they can walk away from those financial obligations before people wake up and realize they can claw it back, all that missing money, all that stolen money, and so on, they can claw back through law.
And then, of course, you've got China, which is not playing anybody's game but their own.
So, you know, they're in a real mess.
Yeah.
The Chinese are pouring a tremendous amount of resources into this campaign.
They're solidly behind the Democrats for this.
Yes.
Yes.
Yeah, and that should tell us something.
Yeah, absolutely.
Well, it's interesting because we see the Pelosi, you know, AOC, that whole sort of thing, which is coming off as Marxist.
But you've made the point before that the communist Chinese act a lot more like the National Socialists than the old USSR.
They're much more in that mold.
Yes, absolutely they are.
And, you know, this, and we see it.
I mean, they've got their Sturmabteilung in the form of Antifa and BLM out there rioting and so on and so forth.
Overdue Ballots and Votes00:08:18
Yeah.
And, you know, you're seeing the pushback coming now with, you know, so many Americans buying guns and storing up food and so on and so forth because, like it or not, everybody senses what's coming.
Yeah.
And that, to me, is another indicator that the country is in real danger of major crack up.
And, you know, if, let's put it this way if, if God forbid, The Commiecrats should get into power, thank you, Senator McCarthy.
If they should get into power and actually go through with their plans, how long do you think that's going to play in Texas or South Dakota or Wyoming?
It's not going to play very long.
Yeah.
And by the same token, if Trump gets back in, as I say, they've prepped the narrative already for many months now for a contested election.
Absolutely.
So.
You know, I just saw today, Daniel, right before we came on, I saw somebody had posted an article to me about 33 counties in the United States registered more than 100% of eligible voters for mail in ballots and absentee ballots.
So that's no fraud here.
We've already set up, I heard that we already have 17% of the vote in.
Yeah, I've heard that too.
Millions, millions of ballots already casted.
That's a hard number.
I mean, yes, it is.
You do expect that with the way that they've played out the COVID thing, that they would get some of this action, but those are incredibly high numbers.
Those are incredibly high numbers.
And here's the bad news, folks.
If they think that's all going to break for Biden, I don't think so.
Right.
I really don't think so.
Because the numbers at the rallies are just not there.
They're just not there.
There's no enthusiasm.
There's no enthusiasm for it, and you can't tell me that an old traditional centrist Democrat is going to be all that keen about the plans that the current leadership has.
Now, certainly there are some that are in favor of that, and most of that I think is coming out of Silicon Valley and the techie people that think they're going to be able to run the whole world with their computer models.
Well, they haven't worked so well so far.
So, yeah, I think we're in a dangerous, dangerous spot.
And, you know, both sides have prepared the ground for a contested election.
And that's what bothers me.
That's what bothers me.
Well, let's stay on this election.
I mean, this episode is the Deep State Target USA October surprise.
Let's look at some of those October surprises.
Now, classically, the most well known October surprise is in 1980 when representatives with Bush and Ford.
Who the guy would become eventually CIA director, William Casey, went to Iran, went to France and negotiated with Reagan leadership not to release the hostages so that Reagan could win and then Carter wouldn't have that big celebration.
And in fact, they released the hostages the very minute that Reagan got inaugurated, showing that nothing fishy there.
The deal, the fix was in.
The fix was in, yes.
And so that's the original October surprise no hostages.
There have been a series of them over the years.
For example, 1960 had an October surprise where Richard Nixon was going to use the records that LBJ got about LBJ's people sent in robbers, you know, these thieves to go in and break in to JFK's doctor's office to try to figure out if his Addisons was bad.
And they were going to use that against him.
And then somehow they weren't able to do it, but Nixon got his hands on that and he was going to do it also.
So there was an October surprise there in the works and someone basically, you know, decided.
It's the better part of, you know, we have a better chance of just trying to do this.
So they hung in there and they didn't go for it.
Although there was lots of kind of mafia payoffs and vote payoffs in that election.
But October surprise this time, this is what I wanted to ask you about because there are so many possibilities and we have such a short period of time, but we're seeing moves like the move of Twitter blocking the Trump campaign from tweeting, for example.
And they did this in the middle of this Biden story.
That maybe gives us a hint of part of this October surprise.
Oh, absolutely.
They're deathly afraid of all of this coming out.
And I think.
I think it will backfire on them because there's already talk now at the FCC of regulating social media platforms, which is long overdue.
Yes.
It's long overdue.
So I think that's backfiring on them to a certain degree.
And I don't think they're going to be able to keep this out of the news cycle.
I really don't.
It's an amazing thing to try.
It's an amazing thing to try.
And it's a sign to me of a certain amount of desperation.
On their part to try something so blatant.
I wouldn't have noticed this takedown of the YouTube channels except yesterday.
Usually on Thursday, I do my dive into the queue people just to see what they're talking about.
And all of a sudden, all the channels aren't there.
And what are there are a bunch of negative videos about all the channels I was interested in watching.
Okay, well, that's interesting.
And then I find out, yeah, just today, people are emailing me asking me, you know, my cousin.
Was one of them, and he may even be in the chat room.
I don't know, but um, emailed me instead.
Yeah, hello, cousin Marty, if you're here.
Um, you know, I saw all these emails I was getting from people, and to me, that's just so blatant.
You know, they're not gonna, you know, the problem is the presidency is a bully pulpit, yes, and and you know, you can't shut down the White House because the White House has you know more ways from Sunday to shut you down.
The only thing is that Mr. Trump has not availed himself of those means yet.
But if he's reelected, guess what, folks?
Yeah, yeah.
He's going to go after these people hard.
And he'll smash that network of Twitter monopolies.
Only for the mere fact that they acted against him so blatantly.
Yeah, well, they've been acting against him so blatantly for four years, and everybody sees that.
That has an ounce of fairness about them.
I'm not gung ho for the guy.
The guy who's done a lot of stuff that drives me nuts.
FASB 56 being right at the top of the game.
Oh, yes, absolutely.
It's important to balance out that point of view because some people come into it and they're like, oh, I really want Trump to win or I really want Biden to win.
It has nothing to do, in a sense, with what we're talking about.
Because there are differences for sure.
When Biden says, I want a mask mandate and I want Forced vaccinations, I mean, he's completely, you know, that's completely unconstitutional.
So he goes, he flies right off the radar with certain people.
But they've been able to train people into this kind of entrainment thing and masks and all that are part of it.
What I want to get at though is something you were talking about there with the Q stuff, because this is interesting, because you and I have talked about this extensively and it gets into very tricky territory.
Hell Earth and Dr. Lieber00:15:45
But let's do it this way When Q came out, we looked at it very carefully.
And we talked about how a lot of it, when it first came out, was reporting about this Las Vegas shooting.
Yes.
Seemed to have access to a lot of interesting information about that.
And then things started to change and it started to act like a political pack putting out things in a kind of political way.
Then it became like a soundbite machine and nobody really knew who even controlled it anymore.
So I never, you know, anything that was anonymous, for example, it's one thing if you have WikiLeaks because you knew, okay, their source was anonymous, but there was WikiLeaks presenting it.
And over and over again, they turned out to be right.
This thing had no accountability and it was just out there.
And now it attracted some people who were into research and all the rest of it.
But as time went on, it got kind of more bizarre.
And now the media was able to use it as a poster child and say, aha, Trump conspiracy theory, and try to take them all down.
And now we see, you know, and it's funny for you and I because when we were looking at it, we thought that it was kind of culty in a number of ways.
But nonetheless, with them doing this clean sweep of all these Q people in the past 24 hours, That has a weird feeling to it.
It has a very weird feeling to it because it is going to be very easy for the Q people who've now spread all over the world.
Right.
It's going to be very easy for them to use that and say, see, we were right.
They wouldn't have taken us down unless we were over the target.
Yes.
So the only thing that I think it's going to do is it's going to fan the flame of curiosity.
About the whole Q thing.
And I'm four square on board with you.
The thing morphed over time.
Yeah.
And it's very interesting to note the change in the voice, so to speak, of Q.
It sounds like a different Q than the Q that started out.
And, you know, to me, I go back to what you and I said a long time ago about the whole operation.
And that was, it appeared to me to be a team of some sort, number one.
And number two, it appeared to be.
Something with access to very sophisticated computer modeling and to very sophisticated computing power.
So, you know, the, and I just did an interview earlier this week with Bernard Grover on Q with Catherine, and one of the things that we all started talking about was this idea of the computer modeling role in the whole operation because,
pardon me, Bernard pointed out that the Q operation made it appear as if Q was just sitting right across the desk from President Trump and they were waiting to send things on their Twitter accounts at the same time.
You know, the so called Q proofs, the deltas, the zero deltas as a Q proof.
Well, you know, you can do that sort of thing.
You can front load things very easily if you've got access to computer networks like the dark pools that are used in algorithmic trading.
On the markets, you can front load things in picoseconds.
Oh, yeah.
Yes.
And this takes the steam out of the idea that there's someone in Trump's inner circle feeding you all this information.
It might not be that at all.
So, you know, the voice has changed, the operation has changed.
And Bernard pointed out something that you pointed out, and that was what's good marketing technique?
Well, number one, use of the imperative mood.
Make America great again.
That's a command.
Trust the plan.
That's a command.
Right.
You know, it's very, very cleverly done.
And the drops have morphed from drops of information to drops of questions.
Right.
You know, so the whole thing has been very cleverly orchestrated to, you know, bring people in, make them passive.
And it's like Catherine said if this were a legitimate insider operation, where were the warnings about FASB 56 coming down the pike?
Right.
Which basically.
Total silence.
Yeah.
It blacks out the government reporting process there.
Right.
Public can no longer see what the government spends on.
And this is part of the issue with a lot of this, which is it's meant to say, you know what, don't bother, don't look anymore.
White hats are in charge, everything's okay.
Just forget about everything that's going on.
Trust the plane.
Yeah.
So I have a big objection to that.
Now, I don't want to see any of those channels censored.
I think that that's.
No, I don't either.
Yeah.
I mean, that is disgraceful on a number of levels because it means that whoever is out there trying to control this can't stand up to these different narratives.
And they feel like this is getting out of control.
There's too many of them.
That means that you can't compete in the marketplace of ideas when you send somebody out.
But this is interesting because I don't align myself because I won't trust anything that's anonymous, for example.
And I'm smart enough to realize you have to put a name and a face to it, or it could be John Podesta and the CIA.
Yeah, exactly.
Hello, TTSA.
Yeah, exactly.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We're here with Dr. Joseph Farrell.
His website is gizadeathstar.com.
Highly recommend going there and really researching into his incredible books, which I have tonight and I'm going to be quoting from.
Joseph, I have some very interesting links about this October surprise directly from your Babylon Banksters books.
Oh, boy.
And, boy, we're going to talk about Babylon Banksters.
Oh, yeah.
I want to remind everyone that we're going to be taking your questions in the second half of the program, so you can ask them all in caps, and Miss Olivia.
Will be putting those together in style.
How are you doing over there?
Doing great.
Yeah.
Lots of good questions already.
That's great.
We have a huge crowd.
Let's get into this, Joseph.
We have a very interesting kind of backlash going on around the vaccine issue.
This is a hot button issue, which a lot of YouTube channels and shows get either their show get deleted or whatever it happens to be because there's such an incredible.
Lock around this issue.
Now, I had Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the show in June.
We were talking about this, and he was saying, you know, literally Bill Gates was just acting like Alex Luther around all this.
He wasn't kidding.
But it was quite fascinating because he said the degree to which this has gotten and the amount of power behind it is going to take everyone to stand up just to get some transparency going.
And he also reminded me that Bill Gates not only controls so much around the vaccine patents and everything.
Else, but he also was big into satellites.
So, this idea then of an injectable, let's get beyond the vaccine idea that we're setting up a system where human beings can be injected with nanobots and sensors.
How does this relate to the idea of smart cities and all the things, the strange things that we're seeing about this?
Oh, it's huge.
I think it's huge.
In a certain sense, you know, I've entertained the idea.
When this COVID thing started, and when Dr. Lieber at Harvard University was arrested for allegedly not disclosing his financial relationship to the Wuhan Virus Institute.
Okay.
And by the way, Fauci has a connection there, too, that has not yet made the public media.
That's awesome.
Yes.
Yeah, it's definitely there.
And that, incidentally, is coming via connections with his wife, who's connected to Gates, and all this.
In and out.
But I speculated early on, Daniel, that part of this virus, because it behaves so strangely, you know, if you go to temple or synagogue or mosque or church, you're, you know, you can't do that.
And we got to tell you what you can do in your temple, mosque, synagogue, or whatever.
But it's okay to go to a casino.
And it's okay to go out and protest.
So, you know, it's the magic virus.
You know, who does it hit?
But even there, you know, the statistics are so garbled, we don't really know.
And now CDC's come out and says, well, we don't really have a copy of an isolated virus.
Oh, really?
Wow.
So, what are we testing for?
Exactly.
So, I came out with the idea.
Fauci, very early on, came out and he was like, oh, take off the silly mask.
And he was saying these types of things.
I had something I was talking to you about, which is the New England Journal of Medicine.
And they came out saying, well, we know that masks don't do.
Anything, but you know what?
They're a pretty good talisman.
A talisman in a scientific journal.
Amazing.
Yeah, if you want to be protected from the virus, folks, buy yourself a hazmat suit.
That's the bottom line here.
But I was toying with the idea that the virus may be a bioelectrical sort of thing.
In other words, literally something that can be turned on or turned off by an electromagnetic signal over a region.
And we know the Soviets did all sorts of research in this during the 70s.
Yes.
They were absolutely locked onto this electromagnetic medicine model.
And imagine then if you are able to put into a vaccine all sorts of heavy metal, what does that do?
Well, certain kinds of heavy metal will dramatically increase the electrical efficiency of your body so that you become.
Much more like an antenna or a receiver that is much more effective in its ability to receive signals from an outside source.
And then you read Bill Gates' patents, and yeah, he's talking about nanobots.
There's Dr. Lieber and all sorts of stuff.
Then there was that Italian study a few months ago where Italian clinicians had gone in and tested a bunch of viruses just to see what was in them.
And they found a bunch of heavy metal nanoparticles that they could not identify.
And what you know, there was no explanation as to why they were there.
So, in other words, the virus and the vaccine to me is a cover story to get people to take something else that they want to make sure everybody has.
Right.
And again, if you are a more efficient electrical signal receiver, that makes the hard technologies of mind manipulation all that.
Much more effective.
You can't turn it off once it's inside of you.
Right.
That's a hell on earth.
That's a hell on earth.
Plus, you know, you look at that Soviet research, and particularly the way that Lieutenant Colonel Tom Bearden has described it in much of his work over the years, I mean, going back decades now, it's possible to modulate signals that, you know, through your computer monitor, it's possible to modulate signals into any electrical system whatsoever, including the power grid, to literally shut you down,
give you a heart attack, you know, right as you're sitting there.
And making it look entirely natural.
Now, here's the funny thing.
Some of the electromagnetic energy signatures will look to a pathologist like the same types of symptoms as a respiratory disease.
So stop back and think of all those flights of geese in Idaho dropping dead out of the sky, and we were told, oh, well, they contacted sudden onset bird flu.
Well, yeah, that means they contacted southern.
A sudden animal death bird flu at the same time, and it all developed at the same speed.
And they all fell dead of sudden onset bird flu at the same time and fell out of the sky.
Wow, it was activated!
It was activated.
Bingo, turn on the switch, ding, ding, ding.
Wow, so you know, Bill Gates's model then is the micro sludge model of vaccination.
Get your update downloaded now for free, take our chip, you know.
Sorry, folks.
Virus updates over and over.
Virus updates, yeah.
Bingo.
And we all remember how bad the Microsoft software was over and over again.
Precisely.
This is fascinating.
Of course, Gates and Fauci, that's a block.
That's a block.
And they're moving on in.
If we were to go into almost other, let's look at the vaccine part a little bit deeper.
What's interesting to me, and I grabbed a few quotes about this.
There was a story that was rolling around here.
It came from a bootleg video that was taken in 2005.
And this was very interesting because it was this scientist giving a little exposition about the God gene and how they had developed this vaccine called FunVax.
It was to shut off the gene in the brain of these fundamentalists so they wouldn't, you know, sort of have this suicide bomber mentality.
They wouldn't.
You know, have all this going on.
When it came out, Snopes and these other people tried to take it down, Reuters, by saying the conspiracy theory says that that's Gates that's up there.
It clearly was not.
But they tagged that along with it, and that they were able to debunk.
And so they were able to kind of dismiss the whole video, which was basically a Pentagon presentation on a vaccine they were working on to shut off a center of the brain, which goes into the spiritual belief system of a human being.
Now, when we look at where that's going, you know, we talk a great deal about Rudolf Steiner on this show.
And Steiner, although he's around in like 1920, World War I era, he's talking a lot about what they call inoculations at the time.
And so he has a few interesting things to say about it.
Interestingly enough, the Waldorf schools that he's so popular for creating are under great attack because they're not big into vaccines either.
But that's a picture of Steiner there.
A quick quote from Steiner, and then we'll get into this.
Image Likeness and Conscience00:07:50
And he says, I've pointed out that while human bodies will develop in such a way that certain spiritualities can find room in them, the materialistic bent, which will spread more and more under the guidance of spirits of darkness, will work against this and combat it by physical means.
I've told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts in whom they will be dwelling to find a vaccine.
That will drive all inclination towards spirituality out of people's souls when they're still very young.
And this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body.
Now, he goes on here, and it's quite fascinating.
And I want to say something here, which is I keep seeing kind of chopped up versions of this online.
And I think it's great that Steiner's getting the interest.
We try to always present his work because it's such a core foundation of what we do.
But this lecture, this quote comes from Lecture 13 The Fallen Spirit's Influence in the World.
In Doornock, October 27th, October 1917.
That's where it's from.
You can get the quote.
It's actually part of the Steiner archives.
It's very easy to verify, et cetera.
I've been seeing some of them up there that misspell Aramon, and there's all kinds of weird bastardizations of this, which make you wonder if it's just sloppy research.
In any case, that's clearly there, and he has a track record of that.
My question for you is Steiner's vision there is that he can see down the road.
With the scientific materialism, this is where they're headed.
There are these kind of spiritual and cosmological, even like the Mark of the Beast type ideas that we've heard echo back there in religions.
Is it fair to look at this period and what's happening through the lens of what some of these traditions were saying, say in the mystery schools and the earlier religious?
Oh, absolutely, absolutely, I think it is.
Absolutely, I think it is.
You know, if, let's put it, In fundamental terms, if there is a God gene, in other words, if there is designed into our biological makeup a gene that inclines us toward the transcendent, toward God, towards virtue, morality, things like this, if there is such a thing, why is it there and who put it there?
Right.
In other words, you can go back to.
Some of the very early church fathers, and they will be very blunt and say that the image and likeness of God in mankind is not merely confined to that part of us which is incorporeal, or in other words, completely spiritual.
It's also by design in our very physical makeup.
Right.
And they will go so far as to say, even the human form itself, you know, two legs, two arms, and so on, is in itself.
Part of the image and likeness of God.
And of course, in their thinking, they're thinking of the incarnation.
If God Himself becomes man, then literally you're seeing the face of God in human form when you gaze on the face of Christ.
So they are very rigorous in tracing out all the implications of that doctrine, of that belief in terms of their piety and in terms of how they think about things.
So, if you have someone like Rudolf Steiner who is familiar with some of that literature, he's growing up in Lutheran Germany, and the Lutherans, like it or not, are the ones that invented patristics as an academic discipline.
So, if you've got someone like that who's familiar with that literature and he's kind of updating it, so to speak, in terms of a look at what's happening in the materialistic science world, He's going to say things like that.
And incidentally, you can find very similar things to what he said in C.S. Lewis.
So, in other words, yeah, it's something that is falling out of their doctrine and it's falling out of the way they're looking at where science is going.
And lo and behold, yeah, that's exactly what people are saying now.
Well, we've got to get rid of all of that that inclines humanity towards an obedience to conscience or transcendence or God or whatever you want to call it.
Right.
Because for them to have their new world order, they cannot have any control system or mechanism out there that allows people to appeal to something that gives them some independence of conscience and action.
And that's the age old game of tyranny.
Lucifer said it in the Gospels bow down and worship me, and I can give you all the kingdoms of the world.
Right.
You know, so.
It's an old thing that we're watching play out here.
It's very, very old.
It's amazing to me that so much of what's going on plays right into this.
Oh, absolutely.
I guess.
Shutting down church worship services, for example.
Well, let's go back to something that Dr. DeHart and I pointed out in that little book that we came out with called Yahweh the Two Faced God.
Yeah.
The interesting thing is, if you look at the financial community in the 19th century with respect to their links to American revivalism and evangelicalism, these are the people that are promoting the Schofield Reference Bible.
Okay.
And that's the Bible that popularized the doctrine of what I like to call the two stage second coming of Christ rapture here and church escapes scot free from having to go.
Through any martyrdom or suffering or anything like that.
Everybody else is stuck here with the tribulation, two bad guys, you know, and we're up here in heaven and we're watching all of you people suffer and serve Antichrist.
Well, it's big financiers and oilmen whose money are promoting this thing.
Interesting.
And they are able, through their power and influence, to get Oxford University Press to publish this.
Now, that's significant, folks, because the doctrine that they're promoting.
Is not traditional historical Christian doctrine.
And at one point, the Church of England came right out and actually excommunicated somebody in one of its rare moments of clarity for teaching that doctrine.
So, in other words, what I'm telling you is no way would an Anglican press publish a book advocating things that are not part of the received doctrine of the Church of England unless.
There's a great deal of money behind it, and lo and behold, there is.
So, to make a long story short, the reason I raised that is if you look at what's going on now and what they're trying to put into place, it's like they've taken that dispensationalist reading of Christian eschatology and made it their playbook.
That's what's frightening to me because I've warned my people over and over again the fulfillment is the deception.
DNA, Flood, and Iraq00:05:16
They may try to stage it all.
That's.
Yeah, that's a heavy.
And physical enhancements.
Uh huh.
Well, we've talked about this with archaeology wars.
Yeah.
Ding, I just did a blog, Daniel, about some of these emails that have been recently.
Released by Pompeo, Secretary of State Pompeo.
And one of the emails that he's declassified and released is, you can read it on my blog.
It's called, let's see here, let me look real fast.
There's something about the Nephilim in there.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The State Department and the Nephilim or something like that.
Right.
And one of the emails is about the State Department, somebody at the State Department requesting all documents relating to the tomb of Gilgamesh.
Oh, yeah.
And the tombs of the Nephilim.
Wow.
And, you know, talk about a slap in the face.
You know, to me, that's just an indicator, yeah, there was something going on with the invasion of Iraq that had nothing to do.
With Saddam Hussein, alleged weapons of mass destruction.
It had everything to do with kicking out the German and French archaeological teams in Iraq and putting our own in there so that we could gain access to those sites and control of the narrative.
Now, question Why would you want to get tombs of the Nephilim?
DNA.
Yes.
DNA.
If you suspected.
That any of those people were still around, and I'm using the word people very loosely because they were a really nasty lot.
Yeah.
If you suspected any of them were still around, how would you test for them?
Since, you know, every record says they kind of look like us, walk like us, and quack like us.
Well, DNA.
And where are you going to get that?
The original tombs.
Yeah, the original tombs.
You know, if you can sequence any of that DNA, if any of that stuff is still sequenceable.
That's how you do it.
So, yeah, it's interconnected.
And I think they're using a quasi biblical, quasi Quranic, quasi Talmudic template for all of this.
Right.
Well, this is very interesting to me because we saw a flood around Zechariah Sitchin's work, a flood of Anunnaki researchers.
And it was like, at a certain point, it was just saturated.
And the Nephilim, if you look at the core idea of the Nephilim, there's so much.
Good, solid, interesting background to what was going on there.
But that's much more fascinating than any of the research that came out with this simple idea that, oh, hey, they're aliens.
They came here, they enslaved us, made us make gold, and then they tinkered with us the DNA.
And that's the story, you know, like anyone can buy that story.
And that's kind of like the ancient aliens franchise has gone off on that for 12 years, and it's gone round and round in circles.
But the mentally human compass is a lot more than the idea of an alien.
Yes, it does.
Yeah, it does.
Because the Genesis story makes it very clear, at least if you are approaching it from the standpoint of traditional doctrine, in other words, the tradition that has been maintained with respect to it.
Is it's very clear that these were the fallen angels, right?
Literally, literally the sons of God that were able somehow to mingle themselves with human nature and you know produce offspring.
And you know, again, you find that story and not just in the Bible, you find it pretty much you know everywhere you look if you know what to look for.
You know, it's in the Popol Vuh in the Mayans, for instance, right?
But If you're dealing with fallen angels, every text that I've ever read indicates that these are not nice entities.
That's, you know, putting it very mildly.
They have kind of a spiritual habit that inclines them toward evil things and evil doing, particularly with respect to mankind.
So, yeah, it looks to me like they're invoking some sort of template here that's a very, very old, old thing.
And, you know, that's bad news because they're doing it all under the guise of science.
Deification of Non-Human Instincts00:03:26
Right.
You know, follow the science, we keep hearing.
Well, you know, problem number one is science is not a dogmatic system, it changes.
But to imply that it is a dogmatic system implies a narrative, and that's what we see being enforced.
And it also implies an ability to shut down any countervailing narrative or any opposing science or what have you.
And that, again, is also what we're seeing.
So, yeah, I think we're in very, very perilous times, to be quite blunt.
Well, look at that.
That's fascinating, actually, because if we think about the high priests of science, look how they're trying to make Gates and Fauci leaders, which is amazing because neither of them have any leadership qualities.
Gates can barely stand in an interview, and he became one of the most unpopular people and spokesman for this whole thing.
He almost shut it down.
In reverse, because he was so unpopular when he came out, we're not going to deal with Bill Gates.
Um, but this is interesting to me because they are kind of like you know, Darwin, in a sense, ascended to this position, and even he didn't want it, but they put him up and they were like, You're the new god, you know, and here's the god of science to replace the god of religion, right?
Yeah, it's it's it's it's a uh, it's coming out of Daniel, I think, this inclination that we have had in in the west.
Since Rene Descartes, to view reason, human reason itself, as nothing but mere ratiocination.
Whereas to the ancients, to a Plato, or to an Aristotle, or a Plotinus, or whoever, or the Stoics, reason meant something more than mankind's merely ratiocinating powers.
It also encompassed his passions.
It encompassed his emotional life.
And the rational person didn't neglect those things.
But tempered them and balanced them because it, you know, we call it intuition now.
But to them, it was part of reason itself, it was inbuilt.
You know, we've gone on in the West for centuries now thinking of animals as nothing but kind of automatons, yes, reacting to their instincts.
And the problem is, instincts, just like reason itself, is a program, it's part of the software.
And it's how we use that software.
So we're watching the deification of something that ultimately then isn't human.
Right.
It's more of a machine.
Because if you reduce human reason to mere ratiocination, it becomes digital rather than analog.
And that's why, once you make that step philosophically, that's why we've got the transhumanists.
Well, we can download you and upload you.
Your personality is nothing but information.
And again, that's another theological, to be blunt, that's another theological dilemma because the West eventually came to equate the soul and person as the same thing.
False Turns in Politics00:06:45
And they're not.
The soul is part of human nature.
The person is, so to speak, that in which the soul happens.
Okay, so in other words, all of your emotions, all of your memories, all of your Relationships and so on that people identify as you are not you.
They're the things that are happening inside of you, but they don't, the sum total of them doesn't equal you.
And again, this, we've got to get it out of our minds that the inhumanness that we're seeing is something that came about by accident.
It's a long process of some philosophical, metaphysical false turns, and some of the people advocating those false turns.
Are doing so very deliberately because they've got to get rid of that component of humanity in order to make their plans work.
Right.
And that's the bad news.
That part of humanity, I think, is more or less indestructible.
And just at the moment that they think they've, you know, look at the history of the Soviet Union, look at the history of Mao's China, look at the history of Nazi Germany, just at the moment that they have all of their wonderful technocracy in place, it begins to fall apart.
Right.
Because it is precisely inhuman.
We are seeing signs of it falling apart.
I saw a most bizarre thing.
It is.
Yeah.
There was an interview of Wolf Blitzer talking to Nancy Pelosi.
Oh, I saw that.
Now, how do you rank that?
This is very unusual behavior.
I watched that and I'm thinking, okay, Nancy.
Here is one of your paid party shills whose allegiances have been clear from the get go.
And he asks you a difficult question, and you launch on this tirade that he doesn't know what he's talking about, or that he's, you know, implication there.
The implication is he's fundamentally stupid.
He's their guy.
Yeah.
You know, she is, you know, Her responses have always struck me as the classic response of a narcissist.
Yeah.
Because remember what she said when she was confronted with having gone to a hair salon without a mask.
Oh, yeah.
And her response was that of a classical narcissist.
A classical narcissist is never sorry for what they do or is never sorry when they're caught out in a hypocrisy.
They're always sorry for what you feel about it.
Yes.
Now, to me, that's narcissism.
So, in other words, all she's concerned about is her own power.
She does not give one tinker's damn about any of her constituents that are wallowing in drug needles and human feces and so on and so forth.
She's only interested in her power.
And it's time to get rid of the, you know what, I was about to use a naughty word.
She was set up, though, Joseph.
Oh, yeah, she was set up.
Yeah, just like Wolf Blitzer set her up, you know.
I mean, come on.
If you can't answer a simple question from a friendly journalist, Yes.
Then you have no business trying to pretend that you're representing people.
That shows a fracture.
I see those.
Yes.
We're seeing them a lot, actually.
And we saw them originally with Bernie's movement.
Yes.
It was kind of like Bernie and the neoliberals going at it.
Yes.
And Bernie, in a lot of ways, you know, it was a genuine movement.
Whatever somebody would think about it, it had real excitement.
It was kind of like its own version of kind of Marxist Trump.
But what the Democratic Party did is they splintered themselves there by basically moving Bernie to the side and putting Biden out as the front man.
And it seems like Bernie went along with it nicely enough, but the people who were setting up, who were really committed to that Bernie side of things, the Bernie brothers, you know, they really felt jilted.
Oh, and I don't blame them.
Yeah.
Because what Bernie was to me was kind of the Democratic equivalent of Ron Paul.
Yes.
And look what they did to Ron Paul, the Republican establishment.
You're not allowed in the convention.
Right.
Thank you, Mittens Romney.
Yes.
You're not allowed in the convention.
So along comes Trump.
Now, try and tell me that Trump didn't garner, just because he was an outsider, a lot of support from the Bernie supporters and a lot of support from the Ron Paul supporters.
Yes.
And that's the contingent that makes the difference now.
That's the contingent that makes the difference now.
Yeah.
You know, and, you know, Whatever you say about Bernie Sanders, what Sanders, if you listened carefully to him, you know, I'm not a socialist, folks, so don't worry, I'm not sliding into Marxism here.
But what Sanders was also saying was we spend all of this money on defense and we don't even know where all of it's going.
We could easily fix some of the other glaring problems in this country with that money.
Right.
That's what he was saying.
And that's a heresy.
That's a heresy.
Yeah.
Just like Trump not doing foreign wars is a heresy.
It's just like Trump not doing foreign wars.
And let's go back to Ron Paul.
What was he saying at the time?
Well, we're spending all this ridiculous amount of money on defense.
Yeah.
You know, shades of Bernie Sanders.
Yes.
So, you know, I'm looking at the so called radical wings in each party and I'm wondering.
Are they as radical as their spokesmen really make them out to be?
And I'm thinking, no, you're dealing with people that are fed up and they're looking for some real representation because Swampington, D.C., is so out of touch with the fact that our bridges are falling apart out here and our schools are a mess.
And a policeman shoots somebody, and the next thing you know, we've got to defund them all.
Universes, CERN, and Philosophy00:11:04
It's totally crazy.
You want a real revolution?
That'll do it.
It's fascinating.
And I want to get into that because.
We're going to do some of these October surprises.
I'm going to run a few of them in a bullet list at you and see what you think gives any credence.
But before we get into that, there's a couple of interesting things around what you just said and what you said earlier about CERN that came to me, which is you posted a blog on CERN about how CERN, which is actually the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, they were moving into this idea of parallel universes.
Openly now.
And they've been accused of this.
So there was an article in Science World Researchers at Large Hadron Collider are confident to make contact with parallel universe in days.
And I'll just grab a section which I think you quoted.
If successful, a very new universe is going to be exposed.
Modifying completely not only the physics books, but the philosophy books too.
That's the part that got me.
The philosophy books, Joseph.
Yeah, the philosophy.
To implicate with CERN and changing philosophy.
Well, look, in the context in which they're speaking in the article, what they are saying is that the idea of parallel universes, which is not multiverse theory, they hasten to add, which is the philosophy, that parallel universes are simply universes that exist in more than three spatial dimensions.
Okay, and that they were going to find evidence of that.
But it was that little thing about philosophy that was the tip off because, unfortunately, there are many very famous, well known, established names in physics that adhere to multiverse theory.
In other words, the idea that there is a universe out there for every timeline, that when you make a choice or a group makes a choice, that brings into existence a Certain universe, but there may be a universe out there that followed the other timelines, okay?
And you have as many universes as there are timelines.
And the philosophy part bothers me because what that, to my mind, leaves the door open to is the idea that once again, a scientist can make a pronouncement about, let's say, Buddhism and say, well, what we've discovered entirely disproves Buddhism.
Right.
And here's the equations that prove it.
Right.
So, in other words, you've got to take it on faith, number one, that these indecipherable hieroglyphics, that, you know, tensor equations and so on, are absolutely disproving Buddhism.
And number two, you have to take it on faith that the equations are correct.
Right.
And that the conclusions are correct.
So, yeah, they have carefully, just like you said earlier, they've carefully constructed.
A materialist narrative wherein science, follow the science, becomes the new mantra, and you've got a new priesthood.
Yes.
A high priesthood, yeah.
Yes.
And we've heard about these chips where, you know, there's such great quantum chips.
And the people, when they come out and they talk about them, just like you pointed out when they were talking about CERN, the scientists would come out and be all kind of teary eyed almost about how great it is to be at the moment of this great opening of CERN.
I feel like I'm transformed into a new being.
Very religious language.
Yes, it is.
It is.
And I'm sorry, I'm not worshiping at that altar.
Exactly.
Let's stay with the soul stuff for a moment.
This was very interesting.
And the quote here is fascinating.
AstraZeneca had to stop the COVID 19 vaccine trials after a volunteer developed neurological problems.
You did a very interesting blog on this.
And then I went digging around on those trials.
This is fascinating.
The quote is they've killed God.
I can't feel God.
My soul is dead.
That's the actual quote from the person in the vaccine trial.
Not so far off from what Steiner was saying.
Bingo.
And also not so far off from what the Pentagon was saying in relation to the radical religious vaccine, where they were trying to shut off that God gene in the person's brain.
All three of those things seem to come together quite nicely.
Isn't that funny?
There's no such thing as a coincidence.
Wow.
You know, these things to me, Daniel, are little telltale clues that we're looking at the real agenda.
That we're looking at the real agenda.
And it's interesting when you compare what she said with statements in the book of Revelations, because it's very clear that the book of Revelation says if you take the mark, you cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
What does that mean?
Well, the kingdom of God, if you go back to.
The Gospels, Christ says, is within you.
Right.
It's not a political thing.
It is a, to cut to the chase, it's a spiritual discipline.
So if you shut off that part of your humanity, how do you get it back?
Well, the only way to get it back is by some sort of external intervention that rips out whatever they've put into you.
That's the only way.
And, you know, that's exactly what Revelations is about.
You get to a certain point where the science has pressed so far that it requires an intervention to stop it.
And I go back to what I've said before.
It looks to me that after World War II, the national security establishment was worried about precisely that problem and how do they short stall it?
How do they.
How do they forestall that possibility?
Well, the way I think that they've figured out was, well, let's try and sneak it in and do it gradually.
And again, I don't think they're going to be successful because what they're doing, she has, in other words, that quotation is very interesting from another point of view.
She has enough of her humanity left that she's noticed it.
Yes.
And it's a problem to her.
Yeah.
So they weren't able to turn it.
Off entirely.
Right.
That's a problem.
For them, that's a problem.
Because if you leave that component there, you know, let's pick Buddhism again.
I'm going to pick on Buddhism mood tonight.
But if you look at Buddhism, for example, you have an entire tradition of disciplines and spiritual exercises and practices and meditations and so on that are designed precisely to free you from entanglement with the world, to get in contact with the divine, with transcendence, whatever you want to call it.
And again, are you going to be able to turn off centuries of that tradition and its inevitable biological Rupert Sheldrake morphogenetic field effects on the human organism that it has and has had?
Are you going to be able to turn it off with a shot or a pill?
Or a mask?
Or a mask?
No, it ain't happening.
And these folks are such, you know, this is the problem with these people.
They're such materialists that they cannot think outside of that box.
Right.
They're presuming to lead the rest of humanity, most of which has thought in those terms for most of its history.
And they're planning to do this in the twinkle of an eye, to quote St. Paul, and it ain't going to work.
Yeah, right.
It's not working.
Case in point, her quotation.
Well, what's interesting is they seem to abdicate all their leadership because there's no ethics involved in what they do.
There's no ethics and there's no morality.
Yeah.
You know, if.
If the end goal is this great, glorious New World Order where everybody's getting along in peace, well, they're getting along in peace because they're part of a hive.
They're part of a collective.
Yes.
They're the shaped stones in the Masonic ashlar.
And this is the transhumanist fantasy.
Yeah, this is the transhumanist fantasy.
They've been telling us this.
The secret societies have been telling us what they really are all about all along.
And unfortunately, again, it's anti human.
We're not blocks in a pyramid, unable to move.
Right.
There's a couple of things with that, actually, because I want to look through the eyes of the transhumanists for a moment, which you do very well.
And you've been warning us about them for a long time.
I'm going to put that on the record because over the last couple of decades, inside of your work, you've been pointing out the kind of Kurzweil transhumanist mentality that's saying, I'm merging in with these machines.
And by the way, I'm coming in from an occult.
Viewpoint, which is I'm going in because I don't want to go up the tree of life in the spiritual fashion.
I want a shortcut, which is jump from animal to mineral and move up this way with my consciousness so I can leave all that spiritual stuff behind and just become this immortal, super kind of scientifically material being that bypasses all that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, guess what?
Guess what?
That locks you.
Into an everlastingness of no morality, no joy, no beauty, no love.
In other words, you're trying to imitate Lucifer.
Joseph Returns with Warnings00:03:46
Right.
Yes.
That's not a future I want.
That's where they're going.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist program.
We're here with Dr. Joseph Farrell, and we're going through some of the things from Babylon's Banksters.
To hidden finance, rogue networks, and secret societies, which I'm going to quote from in a moment.
Some of your very classic books, Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations, which a lot of the conversation, although you wrote the book maybe three or four years ago, a lot of the conversations that we're having, really those things you presage so well in those books.
And we're going to get into that because I have another interesting quote there in relation to what's happening.
And I also want to remind you that we're going to take questions in the second part of the program that's coming up.
Ask them all in caps, and Miss Olivia will be dishing those out for us.
How are you doing over there?
Doing great.
I already have enough questions.
That's great.
And we have a huge crowd tonight.
I do want to point this out.
The name of the Pentagon briefing that I was referencing is Pentagon Briefing on Removing the God Gene, quotes, fun facts.
You can find it on YouTube and on BitChute.
And that's just the idea of what it is if you need to find it.
Yes.
I need to take a very brief break.
So while you're talking about this, let me be right back.
I have plenty to yammer on about.
We'll see you shortly.
That is wow.
This is Dr. Carroll right out of the gate.
A lot of people are saying this is the best episode that they've had a really long time.
Wow.
Well, you know, it's incredible because I'm going to point this out.
We got Professor Peter Dale Scott out of retirement recently, and he came on the show and he delivered two amazing shows that I highly recommend.
And he also gave me about a 10 page definition of the deep state, which, you know, he hasn't done anything on this since 2015.
And we had been doing interviews with him every year, right up until about 2017.
But I had a feeling about this, and he had a feeling about this.
And we came together and we did these episodes.
And then Catherine Fitz came on.
And as I was referencing RFK Jr., all of these people in the background, all these conversations that are happening, it seems like everyone has this sense that this is such a crucial period of time.
It is right in line with the election because that's like the focal point.
And so we have the October surprise as the theme tonight this kind of deep state.
Attack on the USA, this is kind of the center point of what they're doing.
And so now with Joseph, we have this incredible kind of background that he's been laying out for decades, really.
I mean, at least a good 15 years.
And these books are remarkable.
You know, little by little, the picture of what they are starting to come together.
And so now we're seeing this play out.
But I have been having that feeling over the past couple of months that everyone is stepping.
Up their game and coming into this, and like the professor coming out of retirement, and you know, people who are very well known to this show, like Gigi Young, for example, doing incredible work, and really Catherine Austin Fitz, some of the most incredible work of her career going on right now.
So it's remarkable.
And Joseph is back.
I'm back.
So, Joseph, I want to get into a couple of things that have been going on that are just interesting to me to tie in this idea of a kind of supernatural system, even around the financial question.
Which you covered very well in Babylon's Banksters.
Money Laundering Secrets00:10:24
And here's how I'm going to come into it Fauci warns Thanksgiving gatherings may need to be, quote, sacrificed.
That's his quote.
Sacrifice is on.
And we do see that this modern system of finance takes a lot, as you pointed out in Babylon's Banksters, from the original Babylonian.
Set up.
And there were basically two ideas going on there.
One of them was money with no debt, where the kind of transactions were exchanged on clay tablets.
And then there was this other, a very kind of occult supernatural version of all this.
How does this relate to what we're seeing now?
Well, I think it is absolutely crucial to it because, in the process of writing that book and then the follow on, Financial Vipers of Venice, I came across a book by David Graeber.
I'm looking at it right across the room called Debt.
And it's a book.
Really, that is about all of these studies that have been done in the European Union of the idea that, well, maybe infinite debt's not so bad.
And in the course of reading these studies, they also mentioned, well, you know, there's also the idea of a jubilee, which again takes us back to Sumer and Babylon.
So, what was the jubilee in Sumer and Babylon?
Well, there were two kinds of money that circulated in those societies.
One was a Cuneiform tablet, their equivalent of paper money, which was a medium of exchange that was, pardon me.
I'll take your time.
This is fascinating to me because they had the two different systems going on side by side.
Side by side, right.
The first form of money was real money because it was drawn.
Debt free money on the surplus of the state warehouse.
The other kind of money were bills of exchange, loans, in other words, financial capitalism, that were monetized debt.
And that supply was not controllable in reference to any backing, it was all monetized debt.
And that system quickly, as we see today, quickly got out of control.
And so many people were in so much debt that what began to happen was they would simply leave their farms or sell their children into slavery or whatever to pay off all this debt.
And as people were leaving the farms and so on, the infrastructure breaks down and society grounds to a halt.
Does this sound familiar?
Yes.
2020.
2020, yeah.
And as a result of this, they introduced the ceremony, what was called the ceremony of the breaking of the tablets, where every 50 years or so, the king would break the tablets, and that symbolized the financial reset.
Because what he's breaking there are all of those financial instruments circulating as money.
They're just simply wiping them out and starting again from zero, leaving the other kind of money.
Intact.
Now, isn't it interesting that as we speak, we have all of this talk about digital currency, which isn't a currency because it's a corporate coupon and they can reset the value of that anytime they wish.
Right.
That's not currency.
That's not currency, folks.
I don't care what you say about its security or impossibility to hack or anything like that.
That's not currency.
Catherine calls it the credit at the company store.
The credit at the company store, precisely.
A currency has a value established by law.
Think what the Constitution does.
Congress has the power to make and coin money.
In other words, that coining part of the Constitution means that there is a value of money regulated by law.
So look what we've had happening in the last, say, 10 to 12 years since the financial bailouts.
We've had Texas open a state bullion depository, we've had Utah open a state bullion depository, and even circulate gold backed things.
In the Hong Kong coin market, no less.
Yes.
And we've had several states, North Dakota, Wyoming, and so Arizona, passing constitutional money resolutions in their state legislatures.
What does that tell you?
It tells me that at the state level, the confidence in the central bank, the Federal Reserve, is breaking down.
And while we're on the subject of the Federal Reserve, here's a question.
Since it's a private corporation, That has equity stakes.
Has anyone ever seen a stock certificate from the Federal Reserve?
What do they look like?
How would you know that you have a genuine one if you hold one?
On what market are they being traded?
Wow.
Yeah, wow.
Well, you know, you brought up the whole scandal about the bearer bonds.
Ding, ding, ding.
You know where I'm going.
You know where I'm going.
So many people try to jump on the bearer bonds thing after you did that, but you brought it forward that there was this whole system of money circulating out there that was being exchanged, and that we only kind of accidentally found out about it because of those strange people in Italy.
Yeah.
And I go back to what I said at the first secret space program conference Does any counterfeiting operation counterfeit $7 bills?
Do you counterfeit something that doesn't exist?
And even if you are counterfeiting something that doesn't exist, why are you counterfeiting it in such astronomical, huge denominations that even at a sharp discount, you'd be very hard pressed to unload any of this stuff?
So, why go to all of that expense to do this unless you know that there's some sort of hidden market trading in these things?
Yes.
So who has those Federal Reserve stock certificates?
What do they look like?
How do you know if you have a genuine one?
On what market are they traded?
What court would have the standing to adjudicate any sort of conflict of interest?
It's got to be there if you're going to have a financial market like that.
It's got to be there if you're going to trade equity stakes with, you know, Rockefeller sells such and such a percentage stake in the Federal Reserve to the Rotten Childs.
How do you know?
That's what you just got is a legitimate stake.
So there have to be protocols out there that we have never been informed about, and for that matter, probably the Congress too.
I remember the story, and it's early in the Reagan administration, of these groups coming in and saying, I'm buying a bearer bond.
Here's drug money, basically.
It could have been anything, but let's face it, it seemed very much like it was probably drug money.
I come in with my $50 million and I get a $50 million bond.
From the Federal Reserve window.
And at a certain point, they quietly closed that window.
Yeah.
Yeah, and since we're talking about all that drug money and hidden systems of finance, look at the vast amount of money being piled into both of these presidential campaigns.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, it looks a little like it might be money laundering to me.
They said that Biden raised $383 million last month.
Yeah.
And what's he spending it on?
Rallies where nobody shows up?
It's those designer masks.
Yeah.
Where is that money really going, Joe?
Yeah.
Is it going back to the Ukraine?
Is it going over to Mr. You know, who knows?
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Can you jump?
That's a really excellent point.
And this election is a wash in funny money.
Oh.
You know, gosh, we've got a president that was into casinos.
No money laundering ever takes place there.
Adelson just dished out 75 million for Trump recently.
Really interesting.
And you've described how the deep state on this is like a seesaw almost.
You've got the deep state, the CIA deep state behind Biden, and that whole end of things the neoliberal pot of gold.
We're going to make lots of money with China and the North American free trade zone.
That's what America will become a big corporate zone.
And then there's Trump, and Trump has the original North American manufacturers that click inside, deep inside, that's Fortress America click, that part of Trump State.
He has a part of the mafia on his side.
Roy Cohn and UFO Files00:08:33
He's got the direction of Roy Cohn.
He has that deep instruction about how the system works, and how well did Roy Cohn know that system, Jesse?
Oh!
You're the one that coined the phrase that he's the original swamp creature.
And I've been using it ever since because that's true.
Yeah.
No Roy Cohn, no Trump Tower in New York City.
Exactly.
It's that simple, folks.
And Cohn, let's remember, Roy Cohn was intimately connected to the Bronfmans.
In other words, that puts Roy Cohn right in what we're now calling the Epstein network.
Yes.
And, you know, talking about homosexuality and those kinds of networks, well, let's go all the way back to the Army McCarthy hearing, shall we?
Right.
And what was all that about?
Well, it was all about Roy Cohn and his homosexual lover.
And it was clear to everybody, even though they weren't saying it on national TV, it was clear that that's what it was really all about.
And McCarthy's caught in the middle of it because he's probing a little too deeply for the military's good into certain goings on at Fort Monmouth.
Right.
You know, I feel kind of sorry for the guy, as a matter of fact, for getting called in for that one.
He stumbled in there.
He stumbled in there.
He was working on something else.
He was working on something else, and lo and behold, he finds out all.
By the way, that story ain't over.
Yes.
I'm researching.
There's a third one coming?
Well, not necessarily a third McCarthy book, but I stumbled onto something researching another book I'm writing right now.
And.
All I'll say is it concerns Fort Monmouth at that time.
And so I'm thinking, oh boy, if I had been McCarthy at the time, I probably would have thought I better maybe shut this down on my own before I go any further.
Well, let's work off your clue for a second, and I won't make you give up your secret about what the new project is.
But in two books on McCarthy, which were stunning because they finally.
Dealt with these transcripts that weren't available for years for researchers.
And you went in there and you found McCarthy and Cohn talking about Project Blue Book, which is the official government program around the research exercise about, oh, well, the Air Force is looking into these UFOs.
And by the way, we're going to tell you the results, which they know.
But the upshot is over and over again, in the really intense parts of the questioning about what was going on at Monmouth, Blue Book comes up and the security protocols around Blue Book.
That's a mind blower.
Well, that's huge.
Not only does Blue Book come up, but at certain points, and you just know that McCarthy and Cohn are using coded language so that they can avoid having to talk about the Roswell incident.
Because over and over again, the dates of July 1947 pop up in these transcripts, and what was Fort Monmouth doing out there at the time?
You know, all of this stuff.
And McCarthy, let's remember the Fort Monmouth hearings took place in 1952.
You know, he's there in Washington, D.C. during the 1952 UFO flap.
Yes.
So, in other words, you know, and McCarthy, whatever you may think about him from having imbibed the public narrative about him, McCarthy was not a stupid man.
No way.
By any stretch of the imagination.
Yeah.
He was, you know, I call him a shameless opportunist.
In other words, he was, you know, he was a typical politician.
So he knew how to speak in code when he had to.
Sure.
And it's very apparent that this is what he's doing in those transcripts when he's asking questions of various military witnesses that he's called before his committee.
And Cohn, you know, is right there in the thick of it.
And in my opinion, probably had been put into the thick of it by none other than J. Edgar Hoover.
Whose proclivities we are well aware of, and they would have fit Roy Cohn's proclivities to a T.
They were a gay social circle.
Yeah, they were a gay social circle, precisely.
And you put Roy Cohn in there, who is involved in this committee research from the get go and knows all the details.
And then you put him in connection with Trump.
There's no telling.
What Mr. Trump may have learned.
And let's remember something else about Mr. Trump.
Who else is he good friends with?
John F. Kennedy Jr.
Yes.
You know, so there's a good reason why the deep state, a certain segment of the deep state, has been panicked about the man.
From the word go.
From the word go.
Because, you know, Trump, whatever else you say about him, he may look like he's all bluster and, you know, stuff on Twitter.
But when you really examine him, he holds his cards very close to his chest.
Unbelievable.
Yeah.
The UFO file is one of those cards.
And the UFO file is one of those cards.
And he's been intimate talking about that too.
Well, yeah, I'll see if I can get to the bottom of it.
Yeah.
Well, like you don't already know a little bit.
Trump says he'll take a good, strong look at whether UFOs exist.
That's the latest quote on it.
Again, dangling it out there.
Not going into detail.
He did this with Roswell also.
I want to bring this in about Cohn, Nixon, Trump, Kennedy around the UFO file.
Something interesting happened, which is, you know, through the X series, We've been detailing that Trump Nixon connection for a long time, and we had whistleblower Robert Merritt talk about how Nixon had left behind materials related to the UFO file.
And it's been interesting over time, Merritt has actually passed away, but the things that he brought forward seem to every day becoming more and more true out there.
So, in any case, we spotlighted a letter that Nixon had written to Trump.
And we postulated a much larger relationship.
Recently, September 24th, it came out in major publications through the Nixon Foundation that there were 36 letters that they were releasing that were exchanged between Trump and Nixon.
And that's the headline there from the New York Post letters between Trump and Nixon reveal previously unknown relationship.
Well, it wasn't unknown if you were watching the X series, all the things we were doing with it.
But the upshot is this.
That relationship, which they only put on display, they actually put nine of those letters out there.
So there's another 27 letters floating around.
Merritt's story was all about how Nixon kept a letter about the UFO file for when it happened.
There'd be disclosure, and he would be the one who could say, I had this, I was involved in this.
But Nixon and Trump, very close down the line for years.
Nixon knowing a lot about the UFO file.
Trump and Roy Cohn, Trump getting that education.
Trump knows all about the UFO file.
Oh, absolutely.
I think he does.
I think he does.
I think, you know, if you factor in President Kennedy, President Nixon, Roy Cohn, President Trump, and even to a certain extent, President Reagan, and President Clinton, you find this UFO thread running through all of these administrations.
Right.
The Artemis Moon Treaty00:02:23
And, um, The way it looks to me right now is with this talk of financial reset and so on, plus the fact that you see this emerging block against China, and many participants in that block have just recently signed the Artemis Treaty regarding the moon.
Oh, yes.
Oh, yeah.
That's huge.
Quick thing on Artemis, because that's fascinating.
Well, the Artemis Treaty is a treaty that America proposed regarding.
How we're going to go to the moon and mine it, basically, and establish a permanent human presence there.
And so far, interestingly enough, Japan has signed on.
Amazing.
Canada has signed on.
I think Great Britain.
I think France.
I think India.
In other words, basically everybody except Russia and China.
And important to note, Russia hasn't decided what it's going to do yet.
Oh.
Everyone's supposed to be with Artemis.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Now, I suspect eventually Russia may sign on or work out some sort of special protocols for being a part of it.
Because, like the Russians put it very bluntly, if they're going to get there now, we're the only ones that have the equipment to do it.
Right.
They're right.
They are.
So, I suspect that you're watching regarding the moon, you're watching the extension of the geopolitics taking place down here.
Up there, they're trying to lock China out.
Ah, that's awesome.
Yeah, and that to me means that there's another agenda here regarding space with this financial reset because it strikes me and it has struck me since the financial bailouts when we watched the bankers saying, Oh, yeah, we need lots of money, we need it in a hurry, but we can't tell you what we're going to do with it.
And I remember thinking, Okay, these people have somebody's got a gun to their head.
You know, we need so much, we need so many dollars to ransom our kidnapped daughter or whatever.
Hoaxed Reports and Memes00:07:29
Yes.
And we can't tell you what we're going to do with the money because we've been told to have no contact with, you know, that sort of scenario.
They warned of martial law to those.
They warned, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And the question is why?
Well, who's got the gun to their head?
And I have to wonder at the breakneck speed that they're proceeding with all of this.
Number one, they strike me as they're in a hurry and they're in a panic.
And that possibly, going back to my cosmic Versailles idea, possibly a reparations payment or tribute is coming due.
Oh.
And we've got to get up there in a hurry.
Who knows?
You know, I don't rule any.
I mean, if we're dealing with State Department memos on tombs of the Nephilim, that pretty much opens the door to all sorts of speculation here.
Who are they discovering?
Yeah, who are they discovering?
And, you know, why the hurry?
Why the hurry?
This goes right to the quote from your book.
This is an incredible book Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations UFOs, Oligarchs, and Space Secrecy.
I'm going to guess this was 2016.
I think so, about then, yeah.
And just a remarkable overview.
If you want Dr. Farrell's overview on the UFO file, it's in here.
It's in here, along with Roswell and the Reich, I guess.
Yeah, that one too.
They're both incredible.
But this is what is interesting to me.
It's where you talk about this report, and I'm just going to grab a few sections from it.
The chapter is Chapter 6 Social Engineering of the Incredible, Hints from a Hoax and Resonances of a Real Report.
The report's examples include a controlled thermonuclear fission rocket power source and face to face meetings with extraterrestrials.
Proposed studies on the implications of peaceful space activities for human affairs.
The Brookings Report.
The Brookings Report, right.
You show how they go very interesting in this report with the security implications around UFOs, the cultural implications.
But then that report, very much like the Iron Mountain thing, is able to dance between hoax and fact.
Right, right.
And then there's a quote here that you have on the book, which is.
The hoaxed report and some very real memes, the peace meme.
The answer to the question lies to the hoaxed report itself and from it to a very real think tank report.
It may have been the ultimate reference or template.
Lewin is in his guise as the leaker, and I'll ask you to explain that, of the fictitious report.
John Doe states in the original foreword that the assumptions and conclusions of the report are fairly simple.
Lasting peace, while not theoretically impossible, Is probably unattainable, and even if it could be achieved, it would almost certainly not be in the best interests of a stable society to achieve it.
Why is it not in the best interests of a stable society to achieve lasting peace?
The report that you're talking about there that Lewin leaked was the report from Iron Mountain.
Yes.
Which came out, I think, again, about circa 1952, the UFO Flap Year.
And it purports to be a study of a think tank about what are the best memes to pursue if we want to usher in a truly global government.
And they mention two in particular that stand out.
One is an environmental crisis.
Yes.
And the other is an extraterrestrial threat.
Right.
And it's a completely hoaxed report.
And some people even think that it was John Kenneth Galbraith.
Who authored it?
The Economist, you know, the guy that used to square off with William F. Buckley on the old Fireline shows.
And the actual report where you find many of the Iron Mountain stuff more or less repeated and kind of fleshed out is the Brookings Institution's report of 1958.
And again, you're dealing, it's important to remember that both.
The hoax and the real one are coming out of a mentality, an economic model that is basically that of central banks and monetized debt.
Yes.
Because wherever we've seen that system, in order to write off the bad paper floating around in the system, you have to go out and acquire hard assets.
And how do you do that?
War.
Right.
If you take away that system, then war is no longer necessary.
And here's the other problem.
If you introduce an economic system that is reliant on more or less free energy or abundant energy, we don't even have to go as far as free energy, just abundant energy.
Fusion, you know, think of fusion.
If you introduce that system, Then there is no shortage of energy for humans to do whatever humans want to do.
And therefore, you can take the whole current banking system as we've known it now for millennia.
For millennia.
Yes.
We have no experience on how to manage such a system.
We haven't had any experience on how to manage such a system since Sumer.
Wow.
So nobody.
At the European Central Bank or the Bank of International Settlements or Chase Manhattan or the Bank of England, absolutely nobody has any experience with how to run such a system except those who have tried it on small scales locally.
And you have to dig and dig and dig in the literature.
Most of it is not on the internet.
You have to know where to look.
Alexander Del Mar being one such case.
And who's Alexander Del Mar?
Well, Alexander Del Mar was this 19th century Victorian era American numismatist, a guy who did nothing but study money systems.
And he wrote reams of books on money systems.
And occasionally he'll talk about times when a debt free money system was used either locally to finance certain.
Breaking Point in Finance00:15:41
Projects and so on and so forth.
And they work.
But no one knows at the mega level, at the level of the big banks, how to run such a system.
Because their model is a scarcity model.
Their model is a scarcity model.
Wow.
Closed system physics, closed system economics.
Always, always, always.
Open system physics, open system economics.
Always, always, always.
Incredible.
Incredible.
Yeah.
Incredible.
And this brings us, you know, it's funny because one thing we were talking about the bear bonds in there.
The bear bonds contained, in this peculiar case, they contained the face of John F. Kennedy on the front.
Yeah.
And on the back, they showed rockets taking off for the moon.
They showed the space shuttle.
Yeah.
They showed the moon.
And they showed the lunar excursion module.
Why were those on those bearer bonds, in your opinion, Joseph?
I think it was a message because those bonds that were allegedly part of that first Italian bearer bonds story, where the Italian Guarda di Finanza recovered $134.5 billion worth of bearer bonds being smuggled by two Japanese men into Switzerland.
Right.
The Kennedy bonds.
Were supposedly the bonds that were recovered.
But when you dig into those Kennedy bonds, they're appearing out of a trading house, I believe it was located at the time in Indonesia, that specialized in trading sovereign securities.
And it was called Money World.
Okay.
Yes.
And they were the ones that put these things out there.
And I have to wonder if they were indeed fake, that they knew, you know, if you're trading in that kind of stuff, you may have picked up a little intelligence along the way that maybe there's a hidden bond market out there and people are trading gods of sums of money completely off the books, you know, kind of like Prime Minister Tanaka in Japan with his little bond scheme.
And they put it out there, and then the people that picked up the story and ran with it was.
East Asian News, or something like that, which incidentally is a Vatican run media outlet.
That's the long arm.
That's the long arm of the Vatican Bank.
And they've never been up to any financial malfeasance.
But poor Pope Francis inherits this mess.
And what does he do?
He turns around and hires, as the auditing firm for the Vatican Bank, the same accounting firm for the Bank of International Settlements.
Wow.
So, in other words, I think, and here I'm.
In agreement with Catherine, you know, we kind of bumped into the same thing, noticing all of this money that's gone missing and sloshing around in the system somewhere, but we're coming at it from two very different approaches.
But, you know, when I started examining this hidden system of finance and its connection to deep state politics, what I concluded was okay, this system has grown so big that it's now really taking over everything in sight.
Oh.
Hence FASB 56.
Yes.
Because if it's gone that big and appears to be possible to break out into public consciousness, everybody's going to want an accounting.
So we've got to keep this buttoned up tight until we get the whole financial system shifted.
I think that's what's happened.
It's grown so big, so messy, so cumbersome, they've lost control of it and they've crossed some sort of threshold.
In the numbers, that their models simply don't work anymore, and they've got to disguise that too.
Well, it's interesting because FASB comes in as soon as Skidmore joins forces with Fitz.
Then Fitz is not out there saying, Here's the missing trillions, here's the research on her own.
Here is a University of Michigan professor saying, I and my students also found there was missing money associated with this.
And then there are a few articles, Forbes is like, is there missing money?
And then the New York Times is like, there's no missing money.
This is a hoax, this kind of thing.
And then, boom, FASB 56.
And even the things that Skidmore was contacting the Pentagon about, suddenly they said, those pages are no longer accessible.
So that's where this system starts to go black as the missing trillion, the cat's out of the bag.
Yeah.
The whole system is now a black box.
Right.
And these are the people that want to bring in a hidden, pardon me, a digital currency, which is yet another hidden system of finance.
It's not a currency.
Right.
And it's another black box.
So, in other words, you cannot run a financial system on fraud, on a hidden system, and keep it going.
That's where they crossed one of those thresholds.
Because, in my thinking, you're dealing with a threshold, a phase transition phenomenon in economics.
And a phase transition, just to let people know the physics analogy, that's like water freezing into ice.
It's a different form of the same thing.
But they've crossed some sort of phase transition threshold because the numbers are now so astronomical, their models are breaking down.
And I think that's another reason for the panic because they've got to keep that hidden from people just long enough until they can figure out a way to get control of it again.
And I really do think that's what they're scrambling to do, they're scrambling to get control of a system that has gotten out of hand.
Yes.
And it's interesting to me that when we go in and we see that Kennedy was on those bonds.
Yes.
Because Kennedy was this break with the system in two ways.
Yes.
He broke with the system on the space part, but he broke with them on the Federal Reserve.
He broke with them, definitely on the Federal Reserve.
$4.3 billion of United States notes, debt free money.
And I remember spending a couple of those $2 bills.
A lot of them were issued in the form of $2 bills.
Wow.
Yeah.
And I remember spending some of those bills as a kid in the local drugstore getting my candy and stuff.
I remember taking those Kennedy United States notes in to spend.
And the Federal Reserve snarfed those out of circulation as quickly as they were issued.
You cannot find silver certificates in circulation anymore.
You cannot find gold certificates in circulation anymore.
You cannot find United States notes in circulation anymore because those things are what?
They're all constitutional money.
Yes.
Yeah.
And for a real treat, Daniel and listeners, go online and search for Autofund Bismarck.
And what he said about the Kennedy assassination.
Ah.
Ah.
Because old Otto knew what the game was.
And he was very explicit about it.
Fascinating.
Wow.
Everyone's on the internet.
We're going to give you.
Everyone's on the internet right now.
Otto von Bismarck, what did he say about the Lincoln assassination?
Google trending right now.
Yeah, Google trending now.
I ain't done it.
Joseph, though, it is interesting.
And I used to have this conversation.
With Jim Mars around the idea that Abraham Lincoln on the financial side, John F. Kennedy, and Hitler, of all people, all had something in common.
Yeah.
What was it that they had in common?
They had in common the issuance of debt free money.
Because in the Nazi party platform, I think it was the 1932 platform, and it had been more or less a part of Nazi economic thinking.
Ever since Hitler grabbed control of the party, there was a German economist by the name of Georg Feder, F E D E R, who said that we can completely bypass the issue of debt reparations and get the economy moving if we issue what he called labor treasury certificates denominated in Reichsmarks.
In other words, it held the value in law of a circulating Reichsmark, but it had no debt attached to it.
And that's how we're going to finance.
This is very clever.
That's how we're going to finance all of these infrastructure projects, like the building of the autobahns, the dams, the hydroelectric plants, and so on.
They were, yes, huge.
They were issuing money to the workers building these things denominated in Reichsmarks for the value of what they were building.
Fascinating.
So, bang, Hitler takes over, and in three years, by issuing these labor treasury certificates, bypassing the Reichsbank, bypassing all the central bankers.
He is able to build the Autobahn system in Germany, a few large dams, hydroelectric power dams, and so on, put the people back to work, unemployment plunges, and the economy is running successfully.
So the central bankers struck back.
They tried to limit trade with Germany, and they were only going to settle in Reichsmarks that were gold backed by the Reichsbank itself.
And again, Hitler said, Well, nonsense to that.
I will just go and barter for goods in Eastern Europe that we need.
And so he set up this vast barter system with Eastern European countries.
We'll trade you this for that.
So it was direct barter.
And it's exactly what he was doing, is exactly what we see China doing today when they set up these bilateral currency swaps with certain countries.
We'll trade in Iranian dinars and renminbi and trade our goods that way.
And incidentally, we just saw Japan and India sign a pact, a logistical military assistance pact with each other.
Directly, and we're not told how they're going to settle accounts.
Well, I can bet you, bottom dollar, that they're bypassing the dollar completely.
Incredible.
Yeah.
Why would you need to do that?
So Hitler did exactly what we see China doing.
He just.
That is.
The advice that Hitler got to do this, whoever gave him this advice was a genius because they created this incredible booming economy and they got them off the dependency of the.
Central banks.
Well, they got them off of the dependency to a certain degree.
The problem was that as the war began, you have to remember these are notes that are issued on the value of things that they're actually building.
Right.
Okay, tangible assets.
And as the war progressed, what began to happen to the Reichsmark was because they kept using that system and they're not building anything, what they had to do then was conquer a lot of stuff.
Right.
To make, which they did, to make the currency have value.
So, this is why you see after the war breaks out, you see the Nazis beginning to trade Reichsmarks and convert them to hard currency assets and then stashing them all in Switzerland.
And this is the central banking warfare model.
This is the central banking warfare model.
Yeah.
Look what they did to Libya.
Yes, completely destroyed.
Completely destroyed it, smashed it because Gaddafi wanted to be independent of the central banking model.
It's precisely why.
And they did it to Lincoln.
They just got rid of him.
The Confederacy was never a problem.
If you look at Confederate notes, these are notes that are payable on demand after the conclusion of a successful treaty of peace between the United States and the Confederate States of America.
So, in other words, the Confederacy is gambling that it's going to win the war and issuing debt money.
Right.
Yes.
But Lincoln creates his own.
Creates his own.
Green ban.
How is the play, Mr. Lincoln?
Other than that, how is the play?
Wow.
I mean, that's deep.
It is.
When you really look at it from that angle.
Kennedy, again, showing he can go outside that system.
Right.
I'm not going through the Federal Reserve, I'm publishing some USA money.
Yeah.
That's exactly what he did.
And he got the ire of David Rockefeller frequently.
He got the ire of David Rockefeller and his own Secretary of the Treasury, who was C. Douglas Dillon.
Yes.
I remember seeing his signature on those Kennedy notes.
Yes.
It's interesting.
I was just reading a story about the man who had recommended C. Douglas Dillon, and he wound up committing suicide.
Uh huh.
And acting all crazy, and he was married to Catherine Graham.
Uh huh.
Gotta take a break, folks.
You can't go drinking tea all day and keep it to yourself, so I'll be right back.
Fantastic.
Well, Dr. Farrell came ready to play tonight.
Everyone, this is absolutely incredible.
But this is the depth that we're talking about, and it's the money system that we've inherited down through these events.
And what we're really getting at with this is there's been a system of finance that has reached a kind of breaking point.
And it's at a reset.
And their idea of reset, which also includes this thing about the virus and all the things that they're trying to incorporate around.
People plugging into a new system of things.
This idea of smart cities and all the rest of it has us moving into what could be a digital currency, but it's not really a currency, it's a system.
And in that system, there's no freedom.
And where there's no freedom, we're just kind of being plugged in.
So this is what we're looking at.
Nixon Time Capsule Revealed00:10:46
One of the interesting things that came up in relation to what I was talking about with Trump and Nixon there, I thought I would point this out because anyone who follows the show knows a lot about the Nixon time capsule, which we brought up.
And, you know, one of the odd stories around Nixon, of course, is always that he had given this information to Jackie Gleason at one point, which I always found fascinating.
This is a great shot there of him with Gleason.
But Gleason said the story was absolutely legit.
And his ex wife had originally pointed it out.
And the basic story was that in Florida, Gleason had gone to meet.
With, you know, this was Florida, was sort of like the West Wing version of the White House down there.
And they would go and they would do all kinds of interesting things hanging out with Nixon's friend B.B. Rebozo.
And so this got around and then matched up very much with Merritt's story.
And then Snopes did this, which is did President Nixon hide proof alien life in a time capsule in response to the story we put out?
Considering what Snopes has been up to, it was very interesting to me that they jumped on this story originally.
But I want to read this real quickly, which is on MeTV, which we all know is a big cable network, they also picked up on this story.
And it said Snopes classified the Nixon time capsule story as unproven, stating the insufficient evidence exists to establish the given claims as true, but the claim cannot be definitively proved false.
So, it also can't be proven that Nixon had a few aliens stored in Florida.
It surely cannot be proven whether or not the former president showed said aliens to the honeymooners.
But there's MeTV picking up on the Nixon time capsule story, just like we saw the Trump letters being moved in with Nixon.
This stuff, Joseph, it's starting to percolate.
And my word, talking about Nixon and E.T., well, that story comes from Jackie Gleason.
Yes.
Who's not a fly by night guy.
Right.
And is relatively well known at the time.
And had a deep interest in it.
And a deep interest in it.
Yes.
So, you know, is Jackie Gleason going to lie?
I mean, you know, everything that I've read about the man and his character, no, he's not.
He's not.
So, yeah.
And the other thing I was thinking while I was away, the other thing we have to remember about.
The Hitler experiment in debt free money, which you see the Chinese replicate, was that Germany set up a three tiered system of money.
There were notes that were called Rentenmark that foreigners would exchange their currency for and could spend if they were coming to Germany, tourism or whatever, and spend inside Germany.
They wouldn't get Reichsmarks.
Those were the marks that circulated internationally, and that was the monetized debt.
So, in other words, you could never take the debt free stuff out of Germany.
Now, what are the Chinese doing?
Look at their system of money.
They've got renminbi and they've got won.
And one circulates inside of China, the other circulates on the international market.
Interesting.
And, you know, it's amazing to me that this stuff has been out there.
For so long, and nobody's noticing the parallels.
And Kennedy, you know, when he comes along and talk about deep state politics here, when he comes along with that Treasury executive order in June of 1963 to print up $4 billion worth of United States notes, he's putting no prohibition on their circulation.
In other words, these things can circulate internationally.
Right.
Right.
Talk about taking dead aim.
Now, let's compare Kennedy to Trump.
Yes.
Since we're talking deep state politics here.
Right.
If you look at these bailouts, is Trump funding these by debt free money?
Hmm.
Uh uh.
Quite the opposite.
That to me is a telltale sign that.
It may be one faction of the deep state, but don't wait for any big upset of the apple cart.
Right.
Trump's not going to put it all on the line because it'll sacrifice everything that he's got.
Right.
Right.
And the other problem here is assuming Trump wins the election, assuming that he does, how does he behave?
He'll be at that point a lame duck president.
All the shackles are off.
Right.
So, what does he do financially?
And again, we don't really have much of a clue.
There's all this hope porn out there.
Oh, he's going to nationalize the Fed and so on and so forth.
But the problem when you nationalize things like that is just like the Bolsheviks in Russia, you have to go out and buy the stock.
Right.
Where's the market for shares of the Federal Reserve?
What do the certificates look like?
Who has them?
How do you know if they're genuine?
Well, they're all unanswered questions.
All unanswered questions.
They're huge ones.
And it boggles my mind that no one, Daniel, who's talked about the Federal Reserve and all the banker shenanigans surrounding it, has ever mentioned the certificates, what they look like, how they're validated, where they're traded, and how they're adjudicated.
What's the jurisdiction?
That would resolve any contractual disputes.
Where's the precedent in law?
Where's the precedent in law?
Bingo.
Wow.
Incredible.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
This is Hex Series 98, a deep state target USA with Dr. Joseph Farrell.
And we've gone from October surprises to that deep system of finance.
Yes.
There's one more thing there is a precedent with dealing with privately charted equity central banks in this country.
Okay.
The Second Bank of the United States, Andrew Jackson, whose statue Trump prominently displays.
In the Oval Office.
That's true.
That's true.
Now, how did Jackson handle it?
He's got the same problem.
Who owns the stock?
Does Jackson nationalize the Second Bank of the United States?
Well, if he had tried that tack, he would have had to buy the stock.
Right.
What do the certificates look like?
Who held them?
How many were held?
On what market were they traded?
And how are they adjudicated?
Jackson's response was very clever.
He simply refused to renew the charter.
You can have all the stock in the bank you want, and the bank can do whatever it wants, but it's no longer the bank or agent of the United States government.
Hmm.
Hmm.
When did he let it go?
1830.
I want to say 36, but I'm not certain.
Somewhere in there.
Yeah.
Now, Jackson was not a nice guy, let's admit.
Marching thousands of Indians.
Several states in the dead of winter with bare feet is not a nice guy.
Okay.
But sometimes not being a nice guy works if you're dealing with central bankers.
And, you know, if you read his letters and correspondences with Martin Van Buren, of all people, President Van Buren.
President Van Buren was an ambassador at the time, one of Jackson's ambassadors.
And, by the way, the first president to be photographed.
But, um, Interesting.
Yeah, he was.
He was the first president to be photographed.
But Jackson's writings on this whole thing are fascinating because you can tell he knows what he's dealing with.
You know, you are a den of vipers.
That's kind of strong language.
And I'm going to root you out.
Do you kind of go with that theory that these, you know, central banks, the London, Money powers, they lost in the revolution and they have ever since been trying to get America, capture America back.
And that at this point with the central bank action, they're in a position to retake America from this revolutionary war period to now.
I do ascribe some credibility to that for a very simple reason.
When you look at the Morgan interests involved in establishing the Federal Reserve, that's a clue right there because Morgan.
Had at that time had very definite connections with the city.
It had worked out numerous special relationships with British finance.
And when we say that at that time, well, you know, that's Barclays and Lloyds and Rottenchild.
So, the Morgan interest to me is the key that you've got those kinds of British high financial interests involved in the Federal Reserve, specifically Barclays, Lloyds, and Barings at the time, which was still in existence, and then, of course, the Rotten Child interest.
Lorentz Transforms Exposed00:06:30
So, you've got all of that.
And let's remember Morgan had worked out a special deal with the British government when he bought major stake in White Star Lines, Olympic, Titanic, and Britannic.
So, Morgan was used to dealing in that way with the British financial authorities.
So, yeah, I put some credibility into that.
Fascinating.
And Morgan, you could say, dealt a lot with physics.
Oh, yes, he did.
Yeah, he did.
There's a story that Tom Bearden put out years and years ago that.
Right after the Michelson Morley experiment, which was that famous experiment where American physicists allegedly proved the non existence of the ether, which was a big doctrine in physics in the 19th century, that electromagnetic waves, like all waves, had something to wave upon, and they were calling that the ether.
It was a superfine matter that permeated vacuum space.
Okay, and they allegedly set up an experiment.
Disprove this.
And of course, you know me, I think that they set up the experiment in the wrong way and we're looking for the wrong thing and hence disproved nothing.
But the physics economic side of this is Bearden put out a paper that when the Nicholson Morley experiment was published, there was a Dutch physicist by the name of Lorentz.
Okay, L O R E N T Z.
And if you know anything about physics, you'll know about.
The Lorentz transforms.
Everybody has to learn the Lorentz transforms.
And they're basically the equations are coordinate transforms.
The y transforms to y', z transforms to z' on an equal basis, but the x coordinate transforms to 1 by the square root of x minus c squared or something like that.
I don't remember the exact formulation.
But in other words, the Lorentz transforms were an accounting trick.
To explain the results of the Michelson Morley experiment.
And Bearden alleges that it was Morgan that made him come up with that accounting trick.
Now, I've never seen any proof of that, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Well, we have Morgan with Tesla.
We have Morgan with Tesla, right.
Controlling Tesla's output.
And Tesla, let's remember, the reason the Lorentz transforms are important is that they are a principal component in Einstein's theory of special relativity in 1905.
They are absolutely essential to the theory.
So, in other words, if Bearden is correct, Einstein is using an accounting trick in his theory.
And therefore, we may be looking at a whole theory that has been designed to misdirect people away from some real physics.
Now, Tesla is interesting here because Tesla, when you read Tesla and what he thought of Einstein's theories, He thought that they were a great big steaming pile of horse puckies.
Yes, he did.
He did.
And, you know, he was no slouch of a mathematician himself.
You have to figure that one out.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, yeah, if you, again, folks, if you are dealing with ether, ultimately you're dealing with an open system physics, and that implies what?
An open system finance and an open system economics.
If you're dealing with relativity, you're dealing with a closed system of physics in certain respects, and with therefore a closed system of finance and economics.
And this could be what they were trying to.
Okay.
Right.
Well,.
I go back to Maxwell.
I always go back to Maxwell.
Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism were written in an algebra called quaternion geometry.
And if you look at quaternion geometry, it is a geometry that is hyperdimensional.
Has to be.
That's the way he originally wrote his equations 22 variables, 22 unknowns, and a scalar potential that's real.
What happened to Maxwell's equations was Oliver Heaviside, a famous British physicist.
Who came along and rewrote those equations in an algebra that's basically linear algebra as four partial differential equations?
And he got rid of the quaternion component, and therefore he got rid of the scalar component.
And it's that scalar component that's all that infolded magnitude of energy at a particular point.
Okay?
So again, and all this kind of thing.
Right.
So what Heaviside did, what you're learning in physics right now, if you study physics, You're not learning Maxwell's equations, you're learning Heaviside's equations.
So you are being taught to replace a scalar and to equate zero sum vector systems as being absolutely equivalent.
Now, a zero sum vector system is not equivalent to another zero sum vector system on a scalar because if you take four vectors of equal length and they're all converging on a point, that's one system.
Of zero vector sum system.
If you take five vectors and they're all converging at a point, it's still a zero sum system, but the infolded magnitude of energy at that point, the scalar, is different.
So if you're equating zero equals zero and ignoring the physical reality of each system, you're in a mess.
Wow.
Yeah, it's very simple.
You've got covert physics and overt.
You've got covert physics and overt physics.
And we don't want people looking at the covert stuff too closely.
Australian Capacity Targets00:08:11
Right.
So here's.
Because if there's a way to tap into that enfolded energy, there you go.
Wow.
It's a simple trick of changing the language to disguise something that they don't want you looking at.
Wow.
It's that simple.
Incredible.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Program.
We're here with Dr. Joseph Farrell.
It's X Series 98 going off the charts.
With the information, we're going to take your questions here.
And Ms. Olivia, how are you doing out there?
I'm raring to go whenever you're ready.
Let's start with the questions.
I still have a couple of questions for Dr. Farrell, but we can let's roll.
Okay, let's start nice and easy.
Jennifer and Bucks, what does Dr. Farrell think about the Deagle report that says 250 million dead by 2025?
250 million dead in the USA alone?
I don't know what the report is.
But just guessing here, it sounds to me like another fantasy of Mr. Globaloni, another Malthusian fantasy.
We've got too much people, and the carrying capacity of the earth is overburdened, and we need to get rid of a lot of useless eaters.
Most of whom are probably going to be black in Africa.
You know, this is the way these people think.
But the important historical lesson that people have to come away with.
Was that this whole idea of maximum carrying capacity of the earth is not a modern idea?
It's an idea that comes from the Renaissance, the High Renaissance in Italy.
And guess what, folks?
From the Republic of Venice, which is well known for banking and fraud and counterfeiting.
Yes.
Yeah.
And it was a guy, I think it was.
Well, even Paolo Sarpi at one point bought into all of this stuff.
And the maximum carrying capacity that the Venetians decided that the Earth could withstand was 1 billion people.
1 billion.
We've kind of exceeded that.
They've had to adjust the numbers over time as technology improves.
Right.
And this is the problem with every Malthusian climate change global warming model the assumption, the hidden assumption in all of it, is everything remains static.
Right.
Absolutely.
We also know that the Georgia Guidestone number has that 500 million people.
It's interesting, there's an early version of the JFK movie called Executive Action, and you and I have talked about it before.
But one of those figures comes out, he's planning the assassination, and he talks about this 500 million figure and how we're only meant to sustain 500 million.
So it is deep in that psychology, even all the way back then.
Okay.
So, Justin Thomas, let's talk about the non human element behind Fauci and Gates pulling the strings.
Well, we did cover a lot of that, I have to say.
There's a lot of UFO questions, a lot of ET questions.
Yeah.
But, Joseph, in terms of, I'd like to take that question and expand it a little bit.
The Gates kind of mentality goes to that transhumanist mentality, especially him being deep from that technology world and his father from Planned Parenthood and everything else.
Um, so there's a eugenics thing there, and there's a merging of humans with machines and super rulers, and all this kind of thing.
Uh, that gets us into that group very much like Kurzweil who want to merge with technology.
They want to merge with technology to be God because they don't want to serve God.
Is that a fair statement?
Oh, absolutely, absolutely, it's absolutely fair.
That's that's I couldn't put it better.
I think that's exactly the agenda.
They want to.
They want to be obedient to no principle outside of themselves.
And that's a classical narcissist.
It's narcissistic and sociopathic and psychopathic, is what it is.
And again, I go back to the idea well, if you want to live forever in that kind of state, who are you emulating?
The original narcissist, the original psychopath, the original sociopath, Lucifer.
And that's on a cosmic scale.
So.
It does, yeah.
Yeah, it's emulating that original story.
It's fascinating.
Miss Olivia.
So I don't swing around to China.
Don Forbes wants to know, Joseph, what are your thoughts on China's influence in Australia?
Well, it's huge.
It's huge.
I have a lot of members on my website from Australia, and they send me all sorts of stories about, you know, articles and stuff about what's going on there.
And one of the things that I think it was JD, if you're listening to this, sent me in the last couple of weeks Australian agriculture has been heavily influenced by China.
And that intrigues me because Australia is one of those countries, another one like the USA, that has gone whole hog into experimentation and inculcation of GMOs.
Ah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So I think there's more Chinese influence there than meets the eye.
Australians know about it, but most of us in this country and the rest of the West don't.
Talk about targeting Australia.
It seems like maybe because of the vast landmass and the population, that they're able to do a kind of a lockdown when you didn't even have numbers anywhere like the desperate numbers in Europe or something like that.
Right.
But they pulled off some of the most totalitarian measures, and we've seen them over and over again.
Quite a brutal system.
And you have to wonder, looking at it, is that a prototype?
Well, I wonder too.
I've had two Australians write me in the last.
Couple of weeks, one challenging the narrative of the totalitarian lockdown in Victoria.
She said it's not nearly as bad as the media is making it out, which again, you know, I take it at her word.
She's on the ground there and seen it firsthand.
But by the same token, I had another Australian write me and just say simply, you know, send a story with the tagline in his email don't give up your guns because we did.
Ah, yeah.
Yeah.
There's a real map in that.
Yeah, there is.
So, you know, it depends on which Australian you're talking to.
But overall, looking at it from the outside, you know, back when I was thinking of moving out of the country and being an expat, Australia was one of the countries that was on my list to consider.
It's now been crossed off.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
I can see why.
Yeah.
Why?
Incredible.
Miss Olivia.
How does China's social credit system relate to Gates' vaccine?
Oh, easy.
Easy.
If you look at the meme that we've experienced in this country already with the feeder bag on our face, the nose diapers, I have seen this in some of the articles people have sent me that you're not patriotic unless you're wearing a nose bag.
Really?
Yeah.
That's a talisman.
Masks as Spiritual Denial00:02:04
I'm patriotic.
I accept the narrative.
And if you add a mandatory vaccine to that, or just a vaccine coupled to the narrative, if you're a patriot, take the vaccine.
If you're not a patriot, well, if you haven't taken the vaccine, you're not a patriot.
So I think it plays to Gates' whole twisted mentality hook, line, and sinker.
I don't even call him Bill Gates, I call him Bill Gates.
Yes, B A A L. Belial Gates.
Belial Gates, yep.
One quick one on that is the esoteric occult significance of a mask in a ritual.
We get into a few different features there, but there is certainly an occult characteristic to wearing a mask.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
It masks who you are.
You don't have to be yourself in public, it masks you.
And think, you know, the thing that I think of when I think of these nosebags is eyes wide shut and that ritual scene where everybody's in a mask, nobody's themselves.
Everybody is reduced to a persona rather than a person.
The Greek word for one of the Greek words for mask is prosopon, and it does mean in later Greek a person.
But its first original meaning was it was the mask that actors used in Greek plays to symbolize their emotions.
It was a projection, it was a persona.
It wasn't the real person.
So, looked at that way, the masks are a clever talisman to divide you into a public and private persona.
Satanists and Public Personas00:03:11
Right.
And not carry your personhood from one to the other.
To me, it's frightening.
When you're in public, you are the mask.
The masks of New Orleans.
The masks of New Orleans.
You're creating an avatar for yourself and then parading around in it.
Wow.
And that's make believe.
That's fairy tale.
That's a spiritual denial of who you are.
And that to me is very frightening.
Wow, Miss Olivia.
Pally Christensen, could you ask Joseph if the current two warring factions of the deep state could be divided into Satanists and Luciferians?
Divided into Satanists and Luciferians?
Well, no, I don't like Manichaean dualistic systems.
I'm just not made that way.
I know there's a school of thought out there that says that Satan and Lucifer are different persons.
I don't quibble because what I'm concerned with is the symbolism of the two, and in most people's minds, they're equivalent beings, equivalent entities.
I certainly don't think that the two factions are all one or all the other.
In other words, I don't think that the faction that's against Trump is all a bunch of Satanists and pedophiles and child sex slavery traffickers and all of that.
And by the same token, I don't think that those backing Trump are all that either.
I do think, I do think that said, that there is a hard core at the very top of the system of governance in this world that is.
Holy and 100% occult in the very blackest sense of that word.
I do think that.
And I think they exist at such a high level that the people that we normally think of as Mr. Global only, the Rockefellers, the Rotten Childs, the DuPonts, you know, that whole crowd, they're kind of middle management people.
The real juice is at the people that are.
Real hardcore practicing magicians, occultists, and so on.
Right, right.
And it's a good thing you do there, which is you're pointing out the caricature of people go after a political thing.
It's easy now.
Anyone who's an enemy, they'll just say, oh, that's a satanic pedophile, boom.
Instead of going into the deeper elements of, oh, that person is a puppet or a middle manager of this bigger system.
And then these black magicians play a whole role, and you'll never get to see that if you just peg these individual kind of middle manager types.
That's interesting to me.
Well, the other thing it does is it prevents you from looking at.
The indications of occult activity.
Deep Memes Driving Disputes00:16:26
Right.
And they're definitely there.
And to give a little clue as to what I mean, and it's got nothing to do with the occult, but what I'm suggesting by using this example is look very carefully at the details.
You know, Hillary Clinton loves Saul Alinsky's book, Rules for Radicals.
That tells me a lot about her character because she's loving a book that's dedicated to Lucifer.
Right.
Okay.
I'm of the opinion when you invoke the symbol, whether you believe in what the symbol stands for or not, you're invoking the character that goes with it.
Whether or not you believe in that character.
So, in other words, a person subscribing to a book that is dedicated to Lucifer is going to pick up, by the nature of the case, the morphogenetic field, so to speak, of that character, whether real or not.
And start behaving like it.
Well, in looking for details, you know, Trump gave that video ostensibly from Walter Reed while he was under quarantine.
And oh, look, he went in on a Friday and came out about three days later.
No, no symbolism there.
And he gave that video while he was in the tomb.
And I looked at it.
And I began to get these emails, and so I thought, okay, they may be on to something.
So I went and looked at this video, and I turned off the sound.
And I looked simply at the tops of the flags on this video.
And what are the tops of the flags doing?
Well, they're moving out of frame a little bit, about an inch, and then coming back into frame about an inch, and then moving out of frame about an inch, constantly during the whole talk.
And you wouldn't have noticed it unless you looked at those flags.
So, in other words, either someone's there holding a camera and recording him like this, and what you're watching is the breathing as he's holding the camera.
Now, I'm thinking, would Trump do that?
Would production value minded Trump do that?
Come over here?
Probably not.
So, there has to be another reason for this slow up and down motion.
And I'm thinking, he's on a ship.
Somewhere.
And interestingly enough, there was a big Royal Navy exercise in the Atlantic at the time.
He's on a ship.
He's not even in Walter Reed.
What if, this is fascinating.
Let's go just a little bit further with that.
Why would he be on a ship?
One of two reasons.
When the whole COVID quarantine thing was announced, I thought, okay.
There's either been another assassination or a real coup attempt, and he's disappearing.
And interestingly enough, when that happened, Tass, Tass in Russia, published an article about President Putin sending a telegram, not pick up the hot phone, hey, how are you doing, Don?
This is Vlad, you know, but sending a telegram to President Trump wishing him.
Speedy recovery.
I'm confident that with your vital life energy, you'll quickly conquer this and blah, blah, blah.
And at the end of the article, in TASS, it said Vice President Mike Pence will not be taking over President Trump's duties while he's in quarantine.
In other words, Trump's keeping the nuclear football, folks.
Right, right.
So continuity of government is not in effect.
Thank you, Nancy Pelosi.
And I thought, gee, what a strange message.
To send.
Oh, you've got the nuclear football.
Yeah, we're doing business with you.
So I thought the other reason then may not be it was to protect him from whatever assassination or coup may be going on in this bizarre world we're in, but maybe he's secretly meeting somebody.
Oh, right.
And what better place to do it on a ship in the middle of an ocean?
Right.
Away from the prying eyes of the media.
And then the question becomes.
Well, who?
Did he decide to get together with Emmanuel for a little French wine on an aircraft carrier in the North Atlantic?
Or did Vlad fly in on his Tupolev?
You know, what's going on, Don?
Incredible.
Yeah, and let's not forget when Putin and Trump met in Helsinki, they had that little confab on Air Force One away from everybody's prying eyes in The SCIF.
And the only translator there was the Russian guy.
Right.
Why only the Russian guy?
Well, maybe it's because Vlad speaks English too, you know, among many other languages.
Yeah.
I'm curious.
Yeah.
So, you know, what's going on?
I don't know.
But I strongly suspect it was either he was taken out of the line of fire because of a possible coup attempt or maybe a secret meeting or maybe both.
Hey, let's, you know, capitalize on the opportunity and sit down and have a little.
Tete a tete with Mr. Johnson.
You know, who knows?
Yeah, something very strange was happening.
Oh, yeah.
Of course, FDR did this with Churchill.
Yes.
And they met on a boat and it was completely.
They met on a British battleship.
It wasn't a boat, it was a battleship.
You can see the 14 inch guns in the background of this thing.
Yeah, but what better way to have a little private time with Winnie and you?
And away from the prying eyes of the media and get the staff away, too.
We'll go into the admiral's chambers and have a little conversation there, like the British wouldn't bug it.
But yeah, exactly.
When he emerged, he seemed better than ever.
Yeah.
He didn't seem like he had, I mean, when he first got into it, he sounded like he had the sniffles or whatever, but it wasn't anything.
And then when he came back, he seemed stronger and better than ever.
And this is the quickest COVID recovery, right?
It just didn't do anything with this guy, which is great.
And, you know, thank God for that.
However, going along with what you're saying, this is kind of interesting.
Because what is it that is regenerating him in this little interaction?
After three days in the tomb.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The symbolism around it is just, you know.
You said, Sue, and I just want to follow up on that real quickly.
We have a new COG commander.
His name is Van Hurric.
Mm hmm.
And his big accolade in the past, he has many, very well decorated, but he was the head of the 509th.
And that's the Roswell unit.
How do you feel about the significance of the COG Northcom North American Aerospace Commander being the head of the 509th?
Messages, highly significant.
Another UFO angle.
Yes.
And.
Let's, while we're adding to this COG speculation, look what else happened shortly after Trump went into quarantine.
The Joint Chiefs.
Right.
Admiral Ray of the Coast Guard supposedly was the first one tested that came down with it.
So now we've got to quarantine the command staff of the Pentagon.
Ah, nothing suspicious there.
Right.
Especially, especially.
Especially if it was a coup attempt.
Yeah.
So, you know, I'm not buying the public narrative, not for one minute.
This is unbelievable.
For one thing, for one thing, we probably, most of your people here on your website, as most of the people on my website know that you can go out and buy a $1.04 pill of hydroxychloroquine and take it therapeutically, and there you go.
No COVID.
No COVID.
All right.
So, Are the Joint Chiefs of Staff oblivious to this?
No way.
So, something else is going on.
This is all theater for us, you know, us deplorables.
But there's something else going on.
There's a big tussle.
There's a big scrap for possession of the football, as far as I'm concerned.
It's like 9 11 all over again.
You know, Bush the stupid flies to Barksdale, jettisons the press gore, makes a strange speech.
Referencing no terrorism, but some kind of test, and then gets back on Air Force One and scurries up to Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha.
Right.
Why?
Well, I'm with Webster Tarpley here, reasserting personal presidential control over the nuclear football.
Right.
Fascinating.
Wow.
Miss Olivia.
Michael Snow.
Dr. Farrell, is there any new info on the structures/slash ships being uncovered in Antarctica due to melting?
Some of the picks are hard to ignore.
Good question.
I have not seen any of the recent pics.
A few years ago, I looked at pictures that were appearing on Google that were being done by this guy that claimed that Google had some way of hiding these pics and that you had to dig for them.
And it showed some truly bizarre, strange stuff.
There's no doubt that it was bizarre and strange.
The question is was it really there?
And, you know, I remain skeptical of these pictures from Antarctica because with Photoshop and the things that we have today, it's easy to fake things.
Yes.
You know, I blogged recently about a story about the Russian discovery of this, I call it a quatoropus, because, you know, the story was that the Russians had found this gigantic octopus with 14 tentacles and battled with it and blah, blah, blah.
And I'm wondering how they got down through a five inch wide hole.
The story was complete nonsense.
But they come out with this stuff, I think, to keep people focused on Antarctica, but also to focus them away from whatever strange stuff may really be going on down there.
And there's no doubt about it that whatever is going on down there is strange.
I wouldn't be surprised.
If one of the things that they are trying to cover up are precisely ruins of some sort or possibly ships, who knows?
So, how do you disguise it?
You put it right out in the open, publish pictures and stuff, and publish them in such a way as to cast doubt on that whole idea, which is what I think is going on.
I do think that there are some sorts of ruins there that they've uncovered and they don't want to disclose them.
For many of the same reasons that the State Department was classifying the fact, oh, we want to find tombs of the Nephilim.
That was what it's all about, huh?
It's interesting that you say that because, in some ways, Antarctica, it's harder to get intelligence on the ground about Antarctica than it is in the United States, practically.
Oh, it is.
It's unbelievable.
There is such a lockdown of information on that continent.
But just the fact that you have Herman Goering.
Rudolph Hess, Buzz Aldrin, Secretary of State John Kerry, King Juan Carlos of Spain, Prince Harry, you know, all of these royals and bigwigs going down there to look at whatever.
And we're told that John Kerry went there to look at evidence of climate change.
I mean, extraordinary.
Yeah, that's just, I mean, come on.
Especially since he was on his way out.
Especially since he was on his way out.
And he takes time in the middle of a diplomatic junket to go to Antarctica.
And Aldrin almost had another nervous breakdown.
Aldrin, yeah, Aldrin says before he goes, he tweets out, Oh, I'm on my way to the launch pad.
Right.
And then he gets down there, he gets sick, and he comes back and supposedly tweets, Oh, I don't want to deal with this.
It's just absolutely evil or something to that.
Yes.
And, you know, people have wondered, Well, is that really Buzz Aldrin tweeting?
Well, who knows?
But, okay, why is a moon astronaut all of a sudden wanting to go to Antarctica in the twilight years of his life?
I can think of better places I want to go on my bucket list.
Right.
So, yeah, the whole thing is strange.
And since we're at it and talking about climate change and moon landings, okay, that explains all of the above interest, but Herman Goering?
Yeah.
No, it doesn't really explain why the head of the Luftwaffe and the founder of the Gestapo was interested in the place.
All the public story is well, he was interested in getting fishing oils and lubricants.
Mm hmm.
Herman Goering?
It was part of his interest because he was in charge of the German four year economic plans.
Oh, so you're telling me Reich Marshall Goering, in order to make the four year plans to work, is mounting an expedition to Antarctica?
Wow.
To find new fishing grounds?
They've got fishing grounds in the North Sea.
Yeah.
You pointed out their archaeology program was extensive.
Oh, huge.
Primarily, they're looking for Atlantean ruins.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's exactly what I think they were looking for.
Amazing.
And who better to disguise it under than Herman Goering?
You know, who had about as much interest in the occult as Bozo the Clown?
I mean, he still has.
That's pretty much it.
Okay, David Termina.
Dr. Farrell, do you suspect that the Trump faction of the deep state actually wants to take on cosmic overlords with fantastic weapon technology instead of paying the dues?
Oh, I think there's a segment of the deep state, whether it's aligned with Trump or not, I don't know.
But I wouldn't be surprised if it is given Trump's nature and his own personal background, you know, Roy Cohn and all of that.
Cohn would have been in the perfect position, particularly associated with Senator McCarthy, to know about the full extent of Operation Paperclip.
Tianjin Chemical Plant Crater00:07:59
And McCarthy, let us not forget, McCarthy was.
A quiet backer of that whole program to bring all those Nazi scientists over here and you know get our hands on the goodies.
Um, and he had his own very deep connections with the right wing back in that time.
Uh, Robert McCormick of the Chicago Tribune, the Texas Oil Men, you know.
So, I think if there's a faction that would be inclined to shoot it out with ET rather than pay a tribute, yeah, you'd find it with.
More aligned with Trump than the other crowd.
And that may be indeed one of the deep memes driving this factional dispute.
Because if you roll the clock back to the 2016 election, there was all of this talk about Hillary Clinton being the disclosure president.
We had all of those emails between Tom DeLong and John Podesta, and this idea that we've had contact and they're really our space brothers, and it's all going to be jonquils and daisies if we just elect Madam Hillary.
So, yeah, P out there before TTSA did, even.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's a really good point.
She made a point of it on talk shows, bringing it up.
She was talking about it extensively.
DeLong and Podesta and that whole thing that became TTSA they launched their op without Hillary because she didn't become president.
And that thing has bumbled and stumbled all over the yacht.
And they're still trying it, they're still trying it.
Absolutely.
On that point, they have Christopher Mellon on board, who worked for W Intelligence.
And Mellon, just a little bit of his background here.
He's born into the Mellon family.
He's the son of Carl Negley Mellon and Ann Stokes Bright, and the great grandson of Gulf Oil co founder William Larimer Mellon.
His Mellon's great great grandfather, Thomas Mellon, founded Mellon Bank of Pittsburgh.
All right.
So just a little snapshot.
You're not going to get any truth out of TTSA on UFOs.
No.
Billionaire man, and they're surrounded by the CIA.
I mean, come on.
Well, in answer, the other part of the answer that's important here is not just simply the financial interests behind TTSA.
Let's look at Trump here again for a minute.
Yeah.
Because his question, I think, has some merit.
Because if you look at Trump, Trump is the one that founded the Space Force.
Yes.
And I have to wonder, you know, and prior to that, we were getting all these mixed messages from the military.
We had General, what's his name, going out to the Air Force Academy.
And giving that little speech about, well, you're going to have to be learning how to fight little green men, and et cetera, et cetera.
So we've been hearing two messages depending on the factions we're listening to.
The Hillary faction, it's all jonquils and daisies, there are space brothers, blah, blah, blah.
And the Trump faction is, no, we're going to have to learn how to fight somebody out there.
And it may be Chinese or it may be somebody else, who knows.
But we're not being told.
But I suspect that, yeah, my inclination would be to see whoever's behind the Trump faction regarding the space thing are those who want to fight it out and take their chances in a war.
Good luck with that.
The key is the line that Trump loves to bring up around the Space Force, which is dominance in space.
Right.
That's saying a lot.
That's saying a heck of a lot because it's implying.
To my ears, Daniel, it's implying more than we've just got to worry about China.
Right.
I mean, come on.
You'd have to be blind not to see that we've had a massive UFO problem since World War II, if not before, but particularly since World War II, and I think for specific reasons.
And the other thing about Trump is that Trump has made these very strange Twitter.
Announcements about having all these wonderful weapons.
Oh, we don't need nukes anymore.
We got better stuff, you know.
Okay, yeah.
Okay, like what, Don?
Kinetic rods of God's weapons are really good against targets in space.
Really, really good.
So, who knows what we might be dealing with?
I suspect there's more than meets the eye.
Fascinating.
Miss Olivia.
GDNPB, Secretary of Defense Esper, during the fires, came out saying Russia and China weaponized their satellites with DEWs five days after images of lasers from satellites show up on the net.
Any thoughts?
Well, again, I'm suspicious of some of those things that show up as proof solid that directed energy weapons are being used to start these fires.
Because, for one thing, The type of damage that you see to some of the foliage around these very anomalous fires is the same type of twisting in the nodes of plants that you often encounter in crop circles.
Yeah.
And if you look at what people who have studied crop circles are telling you, you know, without speculating as to who's doing it, they're just saying, well, this looks like microwave damage to some of these plants.
Well, you can't see microwaves.
And.
So, some of this stuff about DEWs could easily be photoshopped.
I'm not saying they were.
I'm just saying that you have to look at other modalities to account for the strangeness of some of the fires.
You can use the circuitry in a house, the electrical wiring in a house to broadcast a signal.
And you can pulse it with transients that start arcs through electrical shorts and so on.
And if you look at some of those pictures in California, fires seem to have started around the electrical junctions to houses.
So, yeah, you can do this any number of ways.
You don't need satellites in space.
That said, if you look at some of the strange goings on in the last five years, vis a vis the Tianjin chemical plant explosion in China, which to me is extremely suspicious, because if you recall, that chemical plant explosion left a crater in the ground that was a very deep, narrow crater.
Yes.
It's not the flat kind of crater that you would get from a normal chemical explosion because, for one thing, the chemical explosion doesn't have the necessary brisance, the necessary explosive power to drill a hole that deep into the ground.
So, at the time, I and many others, when we saw the picture of that crater, were thinking Rod of God, a kinetic weapon because a kinetic weapon would have that kind of signature.
From impact on the surface of the earth.
Gold Standard Secrecy Issues00:03:58
Okay.
Then the next thing that happened was that very strange explosion shortly after that, I believe, in North Korea of many of their nuclear facilities that were, you know, underground in the mountains.
So strange, yeah.
And the pictures again were very strange from that, and I thought, Rod of God.
But then you had some American general, I think it may have been even General Milley, I don't remember who, that was asked, and I blogged about this, was asked by an American reporter.
About how are we going to handle North Korea?
And the general's response was, well, all options are on the table.
And the reporter then made a very significant statement in the form of a question, which he made sure was heard by everybody recording and by the general.
And he asked, Does that include kinetic weapons?
In other words, rods of God.
And the general's response was yes.
Wow.
Right out of the open.
Yeah.
This is extraordinary.
Miss Olivia, you got two more questions.
Okay.
All right.
So, Shamanis Anamkara, what can we do to prevent the complete removal of our physical paper and coin money system?
Well, the easiest thing that you can do is keep using it.
Yeah.
You know, the BBC just put out a story about oh, now they've discovered that coronavirus.
Can survive on paper money for 21 days.
That is some BS, my God.
Yeah, that is some BS.
I try to shop, and I'm not saying I do this all the time, but I try to shop as much as possible when I do go out shopping with cash.
Just keep using it and store it.
Because I guarantee you that when people really experience digital currency, which isn't a currency, For themselves, they are going to be clamoring for local or regional currencies, local media of exchange.
And you're already seeing this happen right now during these lockdowns.
A lot of communities are creating local currencies to deal with it.
So that's what I would urge.
The second, you know, I'm not a financial advisor, so don't take this as financial advice.
But if, you know, I would, if I had the money, I would be investing in a little bullion of one sort or another.
Correct.
But the problem there, like I say, with bullion is the numbers of the amounts of silver and gold, gold in particular.
Are so badly obfuscated that even there, you're dealing with something that is probably no longer as safe of a hedge as people make it out to be.
Because the people advocating gold are not talking about how much gold is there.
They're not talking about Operation Golden Lily and all that Japanese loot.
In other words, they're omitting huge swaths of territory in order to push the gold standard narrative.
So be careful.
You have to assess your risk in your own situation.
I can't come out with a formula.
No one can.
You have to do it.
That's a good point that you made about the gold standard.
You can't really go to a gold standard now because of all the secrecy.
Exactly.
That's tough.
The cash point of it, I would say, and Catherine and I have been beating this drum for a long time, Daniel don't deal with the major banks.
Operation Golden Lily Alert00:02:35
Right.
Don't deal with Chase Manhattan, Citibank, you know, all of these.
Chase.
Yeah, Wells Fargo.
Deal with a local bank or credit union.
Because at least there you're dealing with people in your community who have to be above board by the nature of the case.
Right, right.
These other ones plugging into that international finance, it's anybody's game.
It's anybody's game.
I want to jump in here with a question.
I know this is off the wall, but I've been meaning to ask you for a while.
And we talked there a little bit about weapons and such.
There was, as you may remember in 2019, these various scares in Hawaii giving out these emergency code signals to people on their phones saying there's a nuclear attack and all the rest.
And it happened a couple of times, one time when the Clintons were on the islands, and also Terrence O'Shaughnessy, who was the COG commander just before Van Ark took over.
O'Shaughnessy strangely retired at the age of 54, which is pretty unusual.
And Van Hurk has taken over.
But O'Shaughnessy was in charge of the kind of protection there of the aerospace of Hawaii at the time.
But in general, what's going on with those types of alerts?
Because the people in Hawaii remember that very well.
They thought they were under attack.
Yeah.
I suspected then, and I suspect now, that those may have been attempts to.
Shoot down Air Force One.
Wow.
Because you recall that when that first alert occurred, it was right as Mr. Trump was on his way to meet with the North Korean leader.
Yes.
The little fat guy Kim Jong un.
Kim Jong un.
I can never remember their names.
They're all, you know, they're all, all these dictators kind of merge into one face of Stalin at the end of it.
But, um, Yeah, I thought it was very suspicious.
And then there was that other missile alert, you know, that made the rounds a few months before that of something being launched from the Seattle Tacoma Bay.
Remember that one?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
And again, on things like that, again, it's easy to Photoshop, but too many people saw it.
Commanded Love for Neighbors00:05:50
Yes.
So I'm thinking in those cases, we're dealing with something real.
So, all right, who's got the ability to do that?
Well, it has to be coming from within the command structure of this country.
If this country was behind the launch.
So, again, I'm going back to this strange quarantine of the president.
I'm going back to the quarantine now of the leadership in the Pentagon.
There's something else going on here.
It's incredible.
Miss Olivia.
Okay.
So, I'm going to ask my question, Lynn, for this question, which is, Annie Kurtz, Joe, do you think there will be spiritual intervention?
And my question is, everyone is tempted to.
Despair right now.
They're feeling very disempowered, hopeless, suicides are up.
We don't know where we have any power anymore.
What gives you faith that we will be living a year, two years, three years from now that we keep going?
Well, I mean, very bluntly, it's faith in Christ.
But, you know, we've been told how all of this is going to end, and it will end with some sort of intervention.
The problem is that it's very easy to counterfeit that intervention, particularly with the technology capabilities there are today.
So, how do you distinguish the two?
Well, you distinguish the two by the virtues or values, and I'm using the two terms in opposition to each other.
I don't equate values with virtue.
You distinguish between the two by Their works.
You shall know them by their works.
Are they advocating something inhuman?
Are they advocating the machine and that we all be plugged into it?
Or are they advocating things that are human?
Beauty, wisdom, truth, so on and so forth.
And when you look at it that way, it's very easy to distinguish between the two.
It's very, very easy.
Are they motivated by love of neighbor?
Or desire for the collective.
And there's a difference.
We're commanded to love our neighbor.
Well, who's our neighbor?
Notice we're not commanded to love the grand abstraction called humanity.
We're not commanded to love brotherhood or sisterhood or whatever.
We're commanded to love something specific and local.
That's a huge key.
Yes.
Wow.
Absolutely fascinating.
Can I just do a follow up?
Yeah.
Okay.
Larry A says, How do we take them down in the meantime?
Well, that's a very good question.
I'm not totally pessimistic.
They're getting pushback from somewhere because they're acting like they're getting pushback from somewhere.
Yes.
And the question is, where?
And, you know, I make it a habit of my prayer to pray for things like restoration of virtue in this country, restoration of churches to their theological foundations and not this liberal social justice crap that you see so many of the churches, particularly the mainstream Protestant denominations, buying into.
I call it post Vatican IIism, okay?
You know, this insanity that.
Hit the Roman church and everybody else when they wanted to modernize and be trendy and with it with their bongo drums and guitar masses.
The thing that I also pray is for the repentance of those involved in evil activity.
You know, wherever you stand on abortion, we've had 60 million, 60 million since Roe v. Wade.
It is not a contraceptive.
It is not a contraceptive.
It is murder and a hypocrisy.
So I pray for the repentance of those involved with it.
But by the same token, if they will not repent, bind them and let them fall into the pit they have digged for others, to quote the psalm.
And I do it by name.
I target specific individuals that I know approve of that abominable practice.
And if it sounds like I'm being harsh on women, no.
Because I've known too many women in my life that have.
Gone ahead and had abortions, and it has done egregious harm to their souls, to their spirits, and to their bodies.
In some cases, to the point that now that they want children, they cannot have them because of damage that was done.
So, we've got to start thinking in moral terms not just ethical terms, but moral terms.
And we have got to get away from this hypocrisy that we can excuse people for voting for a party.
That has commissioned and condoned and sanctioned slavery, that has had its own paramilitary since the KKK, that approves of this, not only that abominable practice, but using the parts that they harvest from it and sneaking it into vaccines.
Election Bullseye on Deep State00:02:59
That's what we've got to do.
So it starts on your knees.
Quite literally.
Wow.
I'm going to try to wrap this up with where we started.
Hmm.
Which is, we've got this has been exceptional going through these different subjects with you.
And I have to say, it seems like the nature of the situation that we're in, you know, this election, the kind of bullseye on the deep state for the USA, and all the things that are going on.
I'm going to bring it back to this October surprise and say, in terms of the UFO file, could that be used by either side?
As the October surprise.
Oh, absolutely, it could.
Absolutely.
In my opinion, yes.
In my opinion, yes.
The problem, as I see it, would it be politic at this juncture to do so by either side?
Right.
And my inclination is to say no, unless they're able to tailor it somehow, Daniel, to.
Resonate with whatever platform they're pushing.
And that would have to be, you know, it would have to be like the queue operation.
Would have to be very precisely calibrated and tailored and marketed in order for it to work.
So, if something like that's going to happen, I would imagine that it wouldn't be so much an October surprise as a Christmas present.
Ah, yeah.
Yes.
Fascinating.
It's amazing because we started off before we really got the show rolling with November 9th.
Which is the anniversary of the beer hall putsch that you described, but it's also the anniversary of Chris Mogg, and it is also the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall.
And we know November 3rd is election day, but it is interesting when we get into this and you think about 2020 and all that, that they wouldn't try to use some of that November 9th numerology.
I think we have seen that they are more than capable.
Of mounting huge, well planned occult operations.
Look at 9 11.
I mean, looked at a certain way, that whole thing is just one huge ritual.
And, you know, striking the Pentagon.
Right.
The Pentagon, you know.
The Pentagon is just another symbol of the pentagram, it's another symbol of the morning star, Venus, Lucifer.
It's with this Trump quarantine thing.
Rituals at the Pentagon00:15:34
Oh, I emerged from the tomb and I'm all better now, and blah, blah, charging, raring to go.
Wow.
You know, right in the middle of one of the most hotly contested elections, tell me that that wasn't planned.
Particularly, Daniel, when you tie it to what I call the Trump messianism meme that's out there in so much of the Q stuff, you know, there was this parade a couple years ago in Italy.
Where the Italians were parading this figure of Donald Trump dressed up as God Emperor Trump.
Yes, yes, I remember that.
And I'm thinking, have you people lost your minds?
You know, one Messiah was sufficient.
We need another one.
You know, much less him, you know, with Apostle Roy Cohn in tow.
You know, it boggles the mind sometimes, but, you know, that's an indication of.
To me, of just how lost the civilization is.
We're looking anywhere but where we need to be looking.
What founded this civilization?
Like it or not, it's Christianity.
It's Christ that founded this civilization.
Like it or not.
And if we're lost and fumbling around with transhumanism and all these other things, there's reasons for that.
We've tried these things before and they haven't worked too well.
I think it's interesting on the gate front, not a lot of People mention this, but I have the Time magazine to prove it.
He's an atheist.
I know he is.
He does not believe in God.
He doesn't believe in anything science.
Right.
Now, I'm saying it's okay to be an atheist.
Don't get me wrong.
But what I'm putting out there is that transhumanist rush is part of this.
I'm disconnecting from the idea of God.
And that makes it easy for me to plug in to myself as God.
And by the way, as God, I'm telling all of you to take my vaccine, which, you know.
It's going to have probably some of my holy drop of blood, and I'll be the new communion, basically.
Yeah, precisely.
You look at it a certain way, and they've all got their sacraments.
Yes.
They've all got their seven sacraments.
They're caricatures of the real thing.
But Gates, you know, I'm four square with you.
You have the honest atheist.
I've got lots of them on my website.
Sure.
You've got the honest atheist who's not out there trying to promote his atheism and make everyone worship him as God.
And then you've got the dishonest Bolshevik type like Mr. Gates.
And, you know, they're the dangerous ones.
And, you know, the same thing goes for agnostics.
There are dangerous ones.
There's no ideology, no religion that has not had their Rasputins.
And that's the problem.
It's not in what you adhere to, but how you live it.
And we're getting plenty of clues from Mr. Gates as to how he lives and how he wants others to live.
And I draw the line there.
No, thank you, Bill.
I don't care if it has the power of the federal government behind it or not.
There are other ultimate allegiances here.
That ultimately were behind the founding of this country.
So, you know, we're watching.
We'll never be able to shake hands again.
That's what Gates wants you to know.
I know, exactly.
I don't want you guys to be human.
Wow.
You know, you can't have Thanksgiving.
You're going to have to sacrifice Thanksgiving.
What he's really telling you is forget the original purpose of Thanksgiving to begin with.
Yes.
You know, stupid, stupid, stupid people.
It's on a level that we, It's almost too hard to comprehend just how arrogant the whole thing is.
And the Twitter case with the censorship and YouTube going along with throwing all these people off their platforms, Twitter getting rid of all these voices, it's absurd.
It's such a surprise.
Well, it is arrogance, but in a way, it's understandable arrogance because, you know, if Rules for Radicals is their playbook and it's dedicated to the cosmic arrogance, what do we expect?
Surprise.
I just wanted to ask, Joseph, do you consider Gates and his, you know, the other transhumanists literally satanic or just, you know, kind of default satanic?
You know, are they.
Default.
Are they actively ritualistically satanic or do you feel like that?
Are they possessed?
They're clearly psychotic.
Where does that come from?
I think that there is.
A possibility of possession in some of their cases.
And a clue to that is that when you flirt with a symbol of evil, whether or not you believe in it, eventually that flirtation begins to manifest in your character and behavior.
So you become possessed by it.
You become obsessed and then possessed.
And with people like Gates, I think there's a possibility that that's in play.
But for many people, I think what you're dealing with are people that decided at some point in their lives that they were betrayed by the institutions of their culture in some fundamental way.
And so they went off exploring.
Alternatives.
And in the process of exploring these alternatives, they've kind of gotten lost.
So you're dealing kind of with the default people there.
And, you know, most unfortunately, the practical matter of the case right now is that those people are the vast majority of people.
You know, this began in the 60s and it kind of grew and just grew and grew and grew until the point that the institutions themselves were co opted by those people and now it's, you know, out of control.
And part of the problem is they're not willing to do the hard work.
Of becoming literate in the foundations of this culture.
And it is hard work.
It is very, very hard work.
But when those institutions that were passing down the culture are no longer doing so, it becomes much harder work.
So we're kind of beholden to both types of people, I think.
Malachi Martin made a very interesting observation many, many years ago when he was on Coast to Coast.
Art Bell asked him, you know, well, how many.
People in these leading families are involved in, you know, real occult activity.
And his response was, you would be surprised at how many old families, well known names, are at the very top involved in this type of activity.
Yeah, and, you know, that's a wow, you know, coming from Mr. Exorcist himself.
But, you know, I wouldn't doubt it that there's some people like that.
And I wouldn't doubt it that Gates and his, maybe even Fauci, you know, Fauci strikes me as the perfect example of David Icke's lizard people because to me he just looks like a lizard.
He does.
He does.
He's got these buggy eyes and kind of serpentine features.
Oh, God.
Yeah.
He's a very, very shady individual.
Well, we'll know if we see him stick out his tongue and it's got a force.
I get it right.
Wow, fantastic, Joseph.
Off the charts.
I wanted to say something, which is that the Mystery School's view of that, and I'm sure this really comes into the spiritual religious aspect, which is you're either a vessel for spiritual forces or you're a vessel for something else.
And in many cases, I think we see the vacancy of some of these people, like Gates.
They get possessed at a certain point.
They're a vessel for these entities, basically.
And it's their own greed that would.
Open this up.
So it's not a normal discussion in many ways because they've come out, you know, sort of fangs bared and said, we want to vaccine you all and you're all going to be ours.
So it's no longer a debate between the population and ideas.
You know, it's one of the interesting things because I was talking about this with Olivia.
In the 90s, you know, you'd have all these issues that would come up like vaccines or you'd have white supremacists on Phil Donahue or something.
The culture talked about all these things.
And Now it can't.
If you mention that you're against vaccines, well, that's it.
You're out.
If you question the mask thing, well, you can't have a place.
They went after Ice Cube because they thought he was for Trump.
And they were like, oh, he was going to be scheduled for CNN on an interview, but we pulled the plug.
Well, don't do him any favors.
Who wants to be on CNN anyway?
The truth is there that the culture has degenerated, obviously, even on that level.
This is the culture that you couldn't say was a high culture in the 90s or the 2000s.
But even from that, it's come down to a point where they won't allow you to talk.
Yeah.
The vacancy that you see in some of these people is now trying to impose itself by force.
And part of the vacancy is it cannot handle discussion.
It cannot handle conversation.
It cannot even handle courtesy.
Right.
There's no work in it.
Yeah, it's totally off the charts in absolute nuttiness.
And, you know, that to me is the surest sign that the situation we're in is not financial.
It is not economic.
It is not political.
It is spiritual and cultural.
Right.
Period.
Period.
These people are narcissists, and that's all they are.
And that means they're empty inside and they pretend to have emotions.
I mean, look at the signature behavior of a narcissist when they interact with people.
They.
They pretend an emotion of caring and responsiveness and sensitivity to get people hooked into their web, so to speak, and then gradually start revealing themselves and playing these games.
And I think Bill Clinton, classic case.
Wow.
Classic case.
Yeah.
Extraordinary.
It is, because you're right.
These are vacant people, these are empty people.
Amazing.
And the actions of Twitter shutting down the conversation.
Again, they can't let people get out of that state of mind.
Because if they get out of that state of mind, you might think, oh, all that stuff is wrong, actually.
It's fascist.
Look at what they are really trying to accomplish with the lockdown.
Note the prison term.
Yes.
Note the prison term.
Look at what they're really trying to accomplish.
They're trying to accomplish the end of conversation.
Of doing what we're doing now, but doing it in physical proximity to other people.
That's, you know, and they have good reason to do that.
That type of activity is where counter revolutions start.
They resonate.
Yeah.
Wow.
Amazing.
And they thought the smartphone could pull it all off.
And they, you know, bingo.
Joseph, incredible.
Absolutely off the charts.
We have to have you back immediately after the election.
Oh, God.
Well, if certain people win, I'm heading for the hills.
And if the other person wins, I'm locking down.
I'm boarding up the windows.
Bruce Springsteen was like, Well, if Trump wins, I'm going to Australia.
And I was like, Well, listen, you haven't written any good songs in 30 years, so.
Either that or give us some good music again.
It's been a while.
Well, you know, that's the other thing.
Look at these lockdowns and the effect it has had on bands, orchestras, you know.
It's just been incredible.
It's just, you know.
I saw a picture somewhere of some orchestra trying to perform in the nosebags.
Oh, my God.
It's absurd.
And, you know, literally, they had little slits in the nosebag.
For the woodwind and brass sails.
And I'm like, what's the point?
Well, you know, that loot is a lethal weapon, according to the.
Yeah, that's precisely.
We can't have that going on.
Damn that Beethoven.
It's just, God.
Gavin Newsom, he's like, hey, listen, I could call martial law.
I could do it.
I could.
Yeah, I could do it.
Thank you.
Just try that out, Gavin.
See how that works out for you.
Like Marshall Newsom, right?
There we go.
Right.
Joseph, it's great to see an extraordinary episode.
Of course, everyone can get your work at gizadeskstar.com.
And, you know, it's amazing because I know you're working on some new books.
I want to shift everyone's focus into those books on McCarthy because they reveal so much.
And I think it's a crucial setup to the period that we're in.
I highly recommend both of those and this one, which I think really gets us into what's happening.
It's Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations UFOs, Oligarchs, and Space Secrecy.
I know this book is from a few years ago and you're over it and you know more now, but it is a fantastic book.
And it really gives us the foundation of what's going on, especially since they will casually talk about the UFO file in public now.
And this book makes a lot more sense in lieu of all that.
Well, thank you.
Yeah, it does, given what we see going on with UFOs today.
Absolutely.
No question.
And people can join your website at Giza Death Star.
Covert Wars Book Review00:03:23
You do webinars and you have talks with the.
I haven't done a webinar in a long time because they take about as long to put together as a book.
I do the vid chats once every two weeks, and they usually last a good six to eight hours.
It's incredible.
Yeah, I've got a good group of people.
I'm trying to schedule a couple of monologues with a couple of my members in the members area.
And like I say, I'm working on a new book that crosses your fingers that there's enough material.
It's a book that's kind of a follow up I wanted to do to some other books.
Physics and alchemy and things like that.
You know, I'm going to drill you for details behind the scenes on that.
Well, listen, I found a picture in one of these books that just floored me.
Wow.
It's one of those pictures that says a thousand words types of things.
That's all I have to say.
Well, yeah.
It concerns the Monmouth goings on.
I was just.
You can't, you know, doing these books, Daniel, it's like I'm in the middle of a Hollywood B movie.
Right.
You know, just when you think you've got all the dots connected and all the characters, you know, in their proper places, wham!
Something hits you and you, you know, you just go wide because you can't make it up.
You cannot make up these connections that are there.
And, you know, What they tell me is that there have been a lot of people up to a lot of skullduggery for a very long time.
Well, that brings me back to one of your greatest books, which is Thrice Great Hermetica.
And, you know, that is the long picture.
That section on Columbus is extraordinary.
And I'll tell you this that you and I got together, I think it was in 2015, and we decided we're going to do this one.
But, you know, the subject matter I was thinking, we do these other episodes, and, you know, we did one on Antarctica.
It got A quarter of a million views.
And I was like, but we'll do this thing and we'll talk about Columbus.
It'll just be something a small group of people will appreciate.
And that thing charged to a quarter of a million views.
So people were very interested.
But that book is fantastic, Thrice Great Hermetica.
I also recommend that.
Just incredible work.
And what's great is that you've been able to incorporate the foundation of the kind of mystery school ideas and you've kept and watched that esoteric thread while you were looking at all these other areas.
So you can really penetrate into that history and also see the thread of those esoteric groups coming through.
Oh, yeah, it's incredible.
I mean, you look at just the arts alone from the Renaissance up to the Baroque, and virtually every painter, every novelist, every sculptor, every Composer is doing some form of esoteric magic in some fashion.
I mean, it's just there if you know what to look for.
It's really very astonishing.
And there's such an explosion of it, you really can't keep up.
Jung Pauli Scientific Obsession00:04:57
It's beyond any one individual to try and do.
You know, Frances Yates probably did the best of anybody in her scholarship of that period.
But even she, you know, She will admit that she just feels like she's just lost in this labyrinth of all of this stuff that's going on.
And everybody's doing it.
Mozart's doing it, Bach's doing it, Beethoven's doing it, Poussin, painting his pictures that, oh, by the way, all should be joined together.
It's just, it boggles the mind.
Well, that gives me an idea that we should do an episode on Faust.
Oh, oh, oh.
Which one, Christopher Marlowe or Getta, or both together?
I mean, both together, but certainly the Gertz.
Oh, God.
Well, listen, I'm a big fan.
I really am.
I'm a big fan of Marlowe's Faust.
I mean, that and Edward II.
You read those things, and my word was he into some really dark stuff.
But yeah, Faust.
I used to, interestingly enough, that you mentioned Faust because I used to begin some of my classes back when I was teaching.
With the opening lines of Goethe's Faust, which are kind of chilling when you read them.
Oh, yeah.
It's just, and it's the classic, again, it's the classic transhumanist you're dealing with, with the character of Dr. Faust.
He's going to get all of this knowledge and all of this power.
The only thing he has to do is sell his soul.
Mephistopheles is there to help along.
Hello, Bill Gates.
Listen, speaking of Faust, if you want the best version of Faust, you know who it is?
Thomas Mann.
Interesting.
Dr. Faustus.
You know who it's about?
It's really about the German composer Arnold Schoenberg, who was a friend of Thomas Mann.
And you get to the Faust scene that he carefully sets up through the novel, and you will just be blown away.
Fantastic.
Yeah, that's the third Faust, Marlowe and Goethe, and then.
Thomas Mann.
You never read Thomas Mann?
Oh my God.
Another one of his is The Magic Mountain, all about mystery schools and stuff.
Oh, yeah.
And this from a 1940s German.
Okay.
Have you ever heard the rumor that Goethe, that Jung was a great grandson of Goethe?
I've never heard that, but it would not surprise me in the least.
Interesting.
Because there's another guy that is not a simpleton.
Jung fascinates me because of the correspondence that he had with Wolfgang Pauli, the physicist.
And again, talk about some mind bending reading, the correspondence of those two.
I want to check that out, actually.
Oh, yeah.
What interests me about Jung is that he was so obsessed with Swedenborg.
Oh, yeah, he was.
Absolutely.
That tells us a lot.
He was very, very plugged in.
Well, we have Jung's Psychology and Alchemy up here.
Okay.
There we go, the Jung section.
Yes, but I'm looking for his correspondence.
Ah, here we are.
Here's a book for you.
It's by Arthur Miller.
Oh.
It's 137.
Subtitle Jung Pauli in the Pursuit of a Scientific Obsession.
Because Pauli was obsessed with the fine structure constant, which fractionally is 1 over 137.
And you know, you read any physicist and they're all kind of obsessed with that constant.
And here's Pauli, you know, a Nobel Prize physicist in quantum mechanics, writing to Carl Jung.
And you read their correspondence, Daniel, and it's like, which one could be stranger?
And they understand each other.
That's the real kick of the thing.
Extraordinary Newsletter Wrap-Up00:13:53
It's like, okay.
I've got a written report from someone who took Lindbergh to meet Jung and said the whole conversation was psychic phenomena and UFOs.
I can believe it.
Yeah.
I can believe it.
Yeah.
Jung was obsessed with the idea.
Yeah.
Absolutely obsessed.
And, you know, what a brilliant mind.
I mean, just unbelievable what he was accomplishing.
You know, it kind of makes Freud pale by comparison.
Yeah.
You read those books.
Anyway.
Wow.
Extraordinary.
You're going to make everyone go out and get that 137 book.
I'm going to remind them again about your book, Eric, because that one sounds amazing.
This is Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations.
Highly recommend it, everyone.
The other one I want to mention tonight, since we were talking about Steiner, is Cosmic Memory.
Just extraordinary.
Prehistory of Earth and Man with a Platonic Solid on the cover.
Good call.
Okay.
They released this later as Atlantis and Lemuria.
Because it's basically his overview of both.
Quite interesting and quite extraordinary.
It's a great adjunct to this conversation tonight.
Joseph, incredible information tonight.
Thank you so much.
And off the charts.
I have to say, at a certain point, when you said Trump on a ship, it was like everything went off the charts at that point.
So you got them all, and you got me too.
And you got to listen.
No deep state activity here, folks.
Uh, and we'll talk soon because we're going to catch up soon, okay?
Yeah, sometime after the election, I've been getting all these invitations to talk about what I think went on with the election.
I'm like, I don't have a clue.
Your guess is as good as mine.
That's called being a man in demand, Joseph.
Well, anyway, yeah, hopefully we won't be in the Marxist utopia after the election, and hopefully we won't be in a fascist one either.
All the Democrats are going to Gitmo.
Didn't you hear that?
Oh, geez.
Yeah, you're going to cram 35 million Democrats into Gitmo.
Yeah.
Uh huh.
Tell it like it is.
It's great to see you.
And we'll talk soon.
All right.
Bye bye, Daniel.
Fantastic.
Everyone, Dr. Joseph Farrell.
Amazing.
Wow.
Off the charts.
Miss Olivia, we have some super chatters.
We do.
Okay.
I would like to thank The Mobsterful, Charles Marlowe, Violet Lotus, GodStudio.net, Joseph Fabry.
Irie A., Rick Time, A Cult Fan, Eurythmia's Fun, Bilgo Metz, Tricky Vicky, Buster Blue Sun, Debbie McAdoo, Gail Saib, KTTZ9, and GDNPB.
Wow.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Wow, we appreciate your support, and it really helps with the show.
And of course, to all our subscribers, thank you.
You're what makes the show happen.
Joseph, off the charts tonight, really putting it where it is.
But certainly covering the October surprise and the deep state.
And a late super chat if you want to call her out.
Channeling the Heart, Barbara Joyce.
Fantastic.
Thank you.
I really appreciate that.
Thank you so much.
Eurythmia is Fun.
Great title.
And of course, Sweet Dreams Are Made of This.
We will see everyone next week and we're going to be doing election specials.
We are also going to be doing a huge.
Yes.
Well, Shamanis Anamkara is making the suggestion that we have been discussing.
DJ, can we have an election night show so we can hang together?
Yes.
In real time, watching it.
Yes.
Well, I'm working on something very special on the election.
So we'll definitely announce it.
Make sure you're on the newsletter list.
I want to say this to all the people who are booted off of YouTube and all that as well, which is it's extraordinary that you're going to lose all that access because you were just trying to do your stuff and put that material out.
All those people, all those fans will come back.
To you, and the platforms will look bad.
That's how it's going to roll, ultimately, in the grand scheme of things.
So do not lose heart.
I do also want to mention that, you know, just in terms of that pattern that we've been seeing about them throwing people off of YouTube, and we've been warning about this for a while.
Ever since they actually threw Alex Jones off, we knew that the fix was in in that sense because, like him or hate him, you know, deplatforming someone is actually a crime.
So I have to say, yes.
Okay, just two more super chatter.
So, Sanjak, thank you so much.
Oh, Sanjak.
Okay, and Shashakila, thank you so much.
Shashakila, what a great name.
Beautiful name.
So, what I want to put across there is that make sure that you take the time, go to darkjournalist.com, sign up for the newsletter.
The newsletter is free, and it keeps you in that loop because if they ever remove our stuff from YouTube and Twitter and all the rest of the places that it's on with these social media networks, particularly here on our YouTube channel, which has 92,000 subscribers, then we will broadcast directly from darkjournalist.com.
But if you want to know it and if you want to keep track of it, you have to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for that newsletter.
That gives us a direct pipeline with each other, which is absolutely crucial.
And I also want to say, in relation to all this, that that type of cowardly deplatforming of channels speaks volumes that we are winning in that sense of bringing the real truth out.
And it's great to have all of your support because that's exactly what we need in order to do it.
You're really the engine that makes us go, and we really appreciate it.
If you're at darkjournalist.com, make sure you subscribe to the site.
And we definitely appreciate our subscribers.
The comments in the ideas room tonight, just extraordinary.
You've got another one.
Expector Inc.
Thank you so much.
That's a great one.
You're going, man.
I know.
Well, the ideas room tonight was off the charts with questions.
And I want to say a couple of shout outs for everyone tonight Charles Marlowe, along with the cat.
So I think we're going to like that one.
Silver Fox, Tim Travis.
I could not believe, you know, the.
I just want to say this in relation to Joseph and.
What he was doing on the show tonight, he really could go into all these different areas and deliver so much information.
And then the revelation about his insights about Trump, that was extraordinary.
I have to say, there's really very few people out there who could do anything like the analysis of Dr. Joseph Farrell.
And it's such a gift to have him on the show.
We were very pleased to have him here tonight and to share the whole night with you.
It's extraordinary.
And I think this information is going to resonate.
For a long, long time.
So we'll see you all next week.
And like I said, there may be some important shows in between now and next week because something very big has happened.
And the hint is that they released those Nixon Trump letters.
But something very significant that I have in my possession now is going to fuel an episode that we're going to do on that.
So it makes all the difference.
And of course, between now and the shows that we've done live, we haven't done a live show in three or four weeks, but we've done all these.
Recorded shows, and they were Catherine Austin Fitz, of course, extraordinary, and Professor Peter Dale Scott, who came out of retirement.
This is the nature of what's been happening with us, which is everyone is coming forward because they know how crucial the election is, this time in history is, the moment of 2020, and all the rest.
This is really where we go.
There's another one, John Doe, extraordinary.
Thank you so much.
We really appreciate it.
John Doe's a great name, also, and also a great movie.
There's also What I want to say in relation to all this is there have been people coming forward behind the scenes who are trying to give me information, and others who are just remarkable people who are very well known who are trying to, you know, we're putting together some idea of them coming on the show and giving us their insight before the election.
So that's what we've been working on right now.
But I can feel, and I wanted to tell all of you about this incredible wave of people knowing that it's just a crucial period of time.
You know, and a lot of people have said, well, it's a war, and, you know, this is what's going on, and we need to.
To kind of close ranks and really face this off.
And I put it in the same title.
I could definitely see that for sure.
But in not saying that it's a war, I'd like to say that certainly it's a crucial period in time where we need to stand up and be counted and really bring the truth forward home.
So we really appreciate that.
Doreen Hewitt, thank you very much.
There was one before her.
Pinhas Lavon.
Fantastic.
Thank you so much.
We really appreciate it.
Just an incredible group tonight.
And the ideas from and the questions were off the charts.
Miss Olivia, you did a great job.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
My brain stopped working after the first hour.
Joseph could do that.
Joseph operates on a level.
You know, when you get really feral going, there's nothing.
I mean, it's kind of untouchable.
Irie A., it's great to see you.
David Tormina, those were great questions tonight.
Scarlet Fire, Najat Madre, it's great to see you out there.
Bethany Green, Ryan, Alyssa Austin, Breach, fantastic to see you.
Stefan, of course.
And, A cult fan, the man, the myth.
There he is.
We will see you all next week and maybe sooner, so make sure you watch the newsletter for all the exciting announcement that we have coming up, Miss Olivia.
We have one more.
Beth Berry just came in.
Oh my God.
Oh, Beth Berry and Kelly Das.
Kelly Das.
Thank you.
That's another great name.
Thank you so much.
Oh my God.
Thank you so much.
So I'm going to give Breach123 the final word.
He says, All we are saying is give pizza.
Chance.
So that's it.
You know, Aether was out there tonight.
It's great to see Aether.
Jennifer and Bucks, of course.
Lee, not Q, Veltman, we see you.
It's great to see you out there.
Bebop, Thomas Tyson.
Of course, we had Carly from Dimensions and Beyond earlier.
Kate, it's great to see you out there.
Thomas Tyson, Jim Marks, David Tormina.
The whole gang is here tonight.
Fantastic.
Thank you so much.
And we really appreciate the support for the show tonight.
Just extraordinary off the charts.
But this is what we're living in.
This is the time period that we're really dealing with right now.
I can't tell you how many people have said that this is the best show ever.
It just, that's the most.
That's nice to hear.
Oh, it's nice.
You know, I felt that whatever it was that Joseph was getting across tonight, it was on another level.
And it's going to resonate here through the next couple of days in extraordinary ways.
Performance and appearance by Dr. Joseph Farrell here tonight, just completely off the charts.
And I have to say, you know, in knowing his work for years, and I've known Dr. Farrell since 2012, and to think about the way that his material has really formed a foundation for knowledge of the period that we're in, and then to think about people like Catherine Austin Fitz.
And the incredible knowledge these people are bringing forward.
Our great friends in the media, like Forbidden Knowledge TV's Alexandra Bruce, the work, the incredible psychic work of Gigi Young.
These are people who I can tell you it's a rare period in time that we have them all together.
And we are looking at a period where so many voices are being silenced.
So let's appreciate and get behind the people who are doing the good work.
And we will all get the benefit from doing that.
And the silencers, Won't they're not going to get the last word by a long shot, uh, and that goes for X Protect and Twitter and all the rest of them.
So, we will see you all next week and look out for some surprises, as I said.
And, uh, Miss Olivia, you already sang your song, so that was pretty good.
But now everybody knows I can't carry a tune, I don't believe it for a second.
We'll see you all next week, and thank you so much.
And, Anthony Tormina, fantastic.
Congratulations to us on that one.
We appreciate the support.
And that was great.
You know, Marty Farrell was out there tonight, and that is Dr. Joseph Farrell's cousin.
So it's great to see him out there.
And it's great to have all of you with us, and we will see you all next week.
Okay.
Thanks, everybody.
God bless.
Have a great night, everyone.
And of course, it says end broadcast, but as you know, it really ends.