Dark Journalist X Series 88 alleges the Trump administration holds withheld JFK Records linking Nixon, UFOs, and a "deep state" CIA. Hosts claim Lee Harvey Oswald was a CIA asset manipulated by George Joannides to assassinate Castro, with Kennedy's death an unintended consequence. The episode connects Bill Gates' pandemic lockdowns to historical psyops, accuses Elon Musk of using X steganography for secrets, and suggests the Carlyle Group acquired the JFK Library to destroy stealth archives. Ultimately, the discussion calls for grassroots resistance against perceived fascist-communist overreach and demands the release of suppressed documents to expose alleged CIA conspiracies involving JFK, RFK, MLK, and modern control mechanisms. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Examining Psyop Levels00:02:35
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalists.
It's a fantastic crowd with us already tonight.
And as usual, I'm joined by the lovely Olivia.
Hi, everybody.
And we have an incredible show set up for you tonight because we're going to be going into the JFK Records Release Act and how it relates to these stealth archives we've been reporting on, and how the Trump administration holds the keys to what is living in those files, and how that relates to everything that's in the UFO file, interestingly enough.
So, there's layers of secrecy we're going into tonight, including the secrecy surrounding the relationship between President Nixon and Donald Trump, which he hinted at this week.
It's been a week of revelations and people just coming out of the woodwork.
And we're going to be taking your questions live tonight in the second half of the broadcast.
What I want you to do is you can ask them early, ask them all in caps, and Miss Olivia will be putting those together.
How are you doing out there?
Doing great.
Everybody has missed the The live show.
And I have missed the live show.
Well, we had some great interviews with Dr. Joseph Farrell, which were pre recorded.
And of course, we've been watching and collecting information on all the COVID terror that they've been laying out in the campaign of fear that's been carried out by pharmaceutical companies and political powers and the media.
The media just is on, they want you to be just petrified.
I think that they're doing some kind of a how petrified can the public get?
And it seems to be paying some dividends, but I think.
That the overreach has sewn all kinds of cracks because all their numbers collapsed early, and even Neil Ferguson from the Imperial College got caught with his married mistress and all this stuff.
He was breaking his own rules.
Obviously, the idea of a lockdown for him wasn't actually real, or he wouldn't have been out there doing all this, especially since he was supposedly recovering from this COVID, but it was basically just a case of the sniffle.
So, you know, you call anything COVID now, basically, you know.
Someone runs their motorcycle off a hill and they call it a COVID accident.
So, this is the way that they've decided to play this off.
Now, the overreach is real.
Tonight's show isn't about that, but it is kind of interesting that we're examining a psyop and there are so many levels of psyop associated with what we've been experiencing over the past couple of months with this.
The CIA Records Setup00:06:45
And as more comes out, we're going to see that the same types of forces again are behind it.
And very often, those forces are identified on this program as the deep state.
But I want to kind of clarify that, which is that the deep state we're referring to is the deep state that Professor Scott, in his books, American Deep State, JFK, and Deep Politics, and the Death of JFK, and Cocaine Politics, and The Road to 9 11, this series of books, which are by Professor Peter Dale Scott, who is a UC Berkeley professor.
Really outline and give us that idea of this other system that's operating parallel with the regular system that we're used to.
And when that system intrudes on our reality, he calls it a deep event.
So things like 9 11, backtracking, you know, Iran Contra, Watergate, things that really changed the paradigm, got a big policy shift going.
And one of the main ones, of course, back there, some 56, 57 odd years ago, Was the JFK assassination.
The JFK assassination is such a crucial event because it is the first deep state action directly against the White House.
And the White House being the seat of power in America, they were no longer content to go around it.
They had to possess it.
And the program that was instituted for this was multi layered.
But one of the layers that was quite important was the Oswald Project because they had to be able to pin this on someone who wouldn't track back to these agencies.
Like the Central Intelligence Agency, which was behind the Kennedy assassination.
Now, the media has supported the notion that it was just Oswald and all the rest, but we're going to see why that is not only beyond the pale, but is designed to keep us in a certain state of mind, and that they've had so much information over some 55, 56, 57 years for them not to have integrated it.
Is a crucial moment in the inside of the JFK records release, which were mandated to be released actually on October 26, 2017, by Congress in 1992, in response to huge outrage about things that people were finding out 30 years after the fact, 25 years after the fact.
So that was mandated by law to come out, those records.
And the records, in fact, would embarrass the Central Intelligence Agency.
So they, at the last minute, went to Trump and said, please don't do this.
We need to protect sources and methods and agents, which is absurd because all those agents who functioned in 1963 are dead and gone, and even the Soviet Union has collapsed, so there's no reason.
So all the reasoning was absurd, but some of the records came out around the CIA records, which were important, but Trump didn't go after the CIA to get those records out.
Now he's had a very standoffish relationship with the CIA, and they've tried to remove him from office three different times.
Specifically with the impeachment process.
Now, some people who like Trump or hate him, it doesn't really matter because what we're talking about is the Central Intelligence Agency, which is an extra constitutional force.
It's actually not foreseen in the Constitution, it's not a regular part of the government.
And so we don't want them determining things like presidential elections.
And I feel like they're going into this mode again with a big push around mail in ballots.
No, we're just going to go like we always do and we're going to pull the lever or whatever it happens to be.
And we're going to vote.
So, none of your COVID scare and none of that BS is going to work this time.
So, they're hoping that they would be able to create this scenario.
As a matter of fact, there's a number of objectives going on, but one of the key objectives that they want to do is they are still not satisfied with not having this control over the elections.
And they want to control the elections all the way back to 1948 in the Italian elections.
The CIA got very involved in doing that because we didn't want the communists to win in Italy.
And so, you know, the types of thinking that came out of World War II and things of this nature are one thing, but here we are in the 21st century and turning to, you know, straight on totalitarianism with transhumanism and with the real takeover by the intelligence agencies of all kinds of things, including entertainment.
It looks pretty awkward when they go to just grab the election.
So these are the things that we need to be aware of and really point out and make sure that don't happen.
In a free democratic republic like the United States.
So, I have to say, around the world, the impact of the Central Intelligence Agency is also, you know, it has this effect where it's pushing for certain interests, and a lot of those interests aren't in the American interests, even, which gets very strange.
So, we have to wonder sometimes who they're working for.
And a lot of that comes out tonight, and it comes out through the personage of a very, not a very well known CIA operator, but somebody who's remained completely off the radar.
And that is someone who was a psychological operator, and he was the chief of psychological ops in the Miami JamWave station during the time of the Kennedy assassination.
His name is George Joannides, and we're going to get into him tonight because he's a crucial figure for us to understand in terms of understanding the PSYOP and how we got into this deep political situation and how the forces of Trump and Nixon actually have re emerged.
And in the 21st century, we have now a very different playing field than we had, say, when Bush or Obama was in office.
And Obama rolled in as basically the banker's clerk.
He was the guy who got in there and got all the stuff done for the bankers while talking a kind of a social justice theme and then got out.
And people are looking around like, what did this guy actually accomplish?
Especially since they get rid of Obamacare now.
So it's a very interesting setup when we look at the current political paradigm.
Tracking Mark David Chapman00:03:08
How are you doing out there?
Doing great.
I have not been able to listen to you much because I'm saying hi to everybody.
You have to get reacquainted.
How are they looking for questions?
Well, I actually have got a juicy one for you right now.
Sure.
Felix Caraballo wants to know Was Elvis murdered by the CIA to deflect from a Lockheed Martin scandal?
Isn't that interesting?
What a great question.
Have you ever researched Elvis' death?
Yes.
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
It goes in a pattern of deaths, oddly enough.
The intelligence agencies get very involved with popular movements, and very often those movements are around musicians.
Of course, you know, they tracked John Lennon of the Beatles very closely when he was here, and there's a very interesting documentary called The U.S. versus John Lennon where they were literally trying to deport him.
That was an excellent documentary.
Yeah, they didn't want him around here leading any, you know, kind of revolts against the state, and they were really.
Freaked out by it, even much more so than anything he planned to do.
You know, he might have done like freedom concerts and things, but he wasn't trying to lead a revolution against the government.
And when he reemerged in 1980, just as a very conservative administration was getting in, some, you know, definitely itchy finger triggers got involved.
And we have a very strange MKUltra case there, which we went over in the last episode, which was, you know, Mark David Chapman, who is.
You know, still has never been researched thoroughly, properly, in my opinion, because people have tried to analyze him from the point of view psychologically.
But you have to look at him in terms of an intel construct.
And the way we'll do that is through the work of Janides tonight, because what they do to these people when they have them all over the world, but they're not wealthy people, they, if you look at somebody like Mark David Chapman or Lee Harvey Oswald for that matter, Lee Harvey Oswald went all over the world.
He went to Russia, he went to Japan.
Finland, I mean, he was everywhere.
And for that period, where there really wasn't that much travel as a citizen, flying a plane was kind of a luxury.
And Mark David Chapman, who assassinated Lenin under very strange circumstances, as we recounted, he also had this incredible travel backlog, living in Hawaii, going to New York to shoot Lenin, but before that being in Beirut, of all places, and all through the YMCA.
And Philip Agee, who really did the major expose on the CIA.
One of the earliest said that YMCA was where they used to do all the recruiting.
And so they could use those, kind of move them around like a shell game, and go into different places like Asia or like the Middle East.
And they just use that as an excuse to plant their people there.
But they had quite an assassination training camp in Beirut.
Global Medical Training Camps00:02:47
And anyone who looks deeply into Chapman is going to find that he's a product of exactly what we're talking about tonight.
But it is interesting when you mention musicians because there are so many, even going back to Sam Cooke.
And some of those things.
You know, Freddie Prinz, who was a comedian and Freddie Prinz Jr.'s dad, he committed suicide under these unusual circumstances after trying really hard to get the Zapruder film out and available to the public.
Because although people knew about it, nobody had ever seen it until the Geraldo show, and that really showed the assassination of President Kennedy.
This is the foundation of when people started to question, I think, the framework of what was happening between the government and the media covering these things up.
And we are the inheritors of that legacy.
This is the place that we find ourselves in.
And it's very interesting that we're speaking about this now because we're right in the middle of a full blown state psyop again.
And this one's gone global.
And the answers are very sketchy indeed.
But the players have moved more into the medical side.
They're trying it through the medical way, just like they've tried it through the military way.
And they're trying different ways and means to control that population and really harvest them.
So, and that includes, you know, in this country and around the world.
It's really happening on a global scale.
One of the things with America is that we have a degree on the independent media side of opening this up to transparency.
For example, this Plandemic video that's been out, which has Dr. Judy Mikovitz, this is outstanding material, really exposing the PSYOP aspect of this through her medical training.
She's had this whole background with Fauci, et cetera.
And then now we see in CBS News, and who got exposed by James O'Keefe and Veritas this week for staging a hospital incident, pretending there were all these people there to be tested.
So we're really in an interesting situation.
But that pandemic documentary brings it home that this is what the independent media is bringing forward.
You know, the programs we do on this show, the work of Catherine Austin Fitz, Joseph Farrell's analysis, Alexander at Forbidden Knowledge TV, these things form a foundation of thought.
And It stands in stark contrast.
So, what we see is more and more naked aggression of censorship by the social media platforms.
And so, that really kind of gets us into this situation.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
This is X Series Episode 88.
And we're going to go deep, swing for the fences to find out these incredible connections that we're going to bring forward tonight.
Factions and RFK Jr00:14:37
We've got the JFK assassination records released and what is in those records and how they're mandated by law to come out.
And the link to President Nixon and President Trump.
In all this, and how Trump has the power to really pull that lever, and how it's a crucial thing.
His very survival, his presidency, may depend on that, but regardless of Trump, that lever has to be pushed.
It doesn't matter who does it.
And we certainly won't be just waiting around for him to do it because he's had some opportunities to do it, but it would be smart for him because, you know, I don't know if he's recognized it, but the CIA really has it out for him.
All right, so let's get to meet some of these.
Very interesting characters.
I want to review a couple of things about the time that we're in and why the JFK assassination aspect needs to come out now.
Having kind of hung around here about 56 years into this, the public is very convinced that they got had back then.
And then there were different committees set up, like the Warren Commission, which lied and said it was a lone nut, single bullet, and all that stuff has been discredited now.
Then there were further observations, the House Assassinations Committee, but it was interfered with by the CIA.
The Justice Department never followed up on it.
We've had other things.
Oliver Stone's JFK movie got our Assassination Record Review Board going in the 90s, and this was crucial because that's where we get the law that all these records need to come out.
Now, when we look at the records that are held back by the CIA in relation to the JFK assassination, it's not that the records will say, yes, we coordinated a plan to.
Assassinate President Kennedy, and here's the map.
But there's a number of things that independent researchers have found over the years.
Everyone from Jim Garrison through May Brussels in the 70s and 80s, Mark Lane, Jim Mars, they've found such a body of work that now the official story has collapsed to such a degree that some of the records that they let out are kind of like those connecting dots that are remaining there.
Will form a greater mosaic.
And this is what I think they're afraid of with those records, because that's why they come up with these idiotic reasons for keeping them.
But they also show outright lawlessness on the part of the CIA.
They're not going to show that there's no confession in there that they committed the assassination, but there's enough dots left in those records, I think, to connect this up and move it on.
There's so many different countries who have.
Reconciliation committees for things that happened in the past, South Africa, for example.
This is how a political process moves forward by admitting its mistakes, by looking into with a transparent council into these things and bringing them to light for historical factors.
Now, the Central Intelligence Agency still wants to hold on to that, just like they still want to hold on to the UFO file.
And that's why you see them doing all these bogus things like the TTSA.
And dominating UFO disclosure.
It's the same, we're talking about the same group that's been controlling this information from the very start.
They were the enemies of the Kennedy family, whether it was Robert Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, John Jr.
You know, this really goes round and round.
And the reason was because the Kennedys had the ability and the power to bring through this sense of freedom, and they had a disdain for the types of repressive tricks that the CIA was up to worldwide.
And so basically, you have two factions there, and the CIA faction and the Kennedy faction have been at war for a very long time.
And, you know, they've kind of had to deal with each other.
And I think it was easy when they had Ted in there because Ted wasn't really much of a threat for them because he had his own problems with Chappaquiddick and everything else.
But I do feel that John Jr., JFK Jr. certainly was going to be a threat for them.
And I think he was very handily eliminated as a result of that.
But when we look at the initial assault on the presidency, it was the deep state attack on JFK in 1963.
Now, the official version, of course, is that Kennedy happened to go to Dallas and that Lee Harvey Oswald got lucky having picked up a job six weeks earlier that was right on the presidential route.
Of course, no one knew that presidential route when Oswald got the job.
Somebody somewhere had tipped off whoever set that all up.
Now, the person who had set it up was somebody who admitted that the CIA had told him to watch Oswald, and that was George de Mornchilt, who was an oil geologist who knew George Bush.
Very often, researchers go into this and they say there's a huge George Bush, that is George H.W. Bush, connection to the JFK assassination.
That's one of the main reasons why, because de Mornchilt.
Was kind of the only friend that Oswald had.
And he was someone twice his age who was a millionaire.
And he was an oil geologist in a totally different class.
And here's Oswald stacking books for a book 50 an hour, basically pretending to be a communist.
They make for very strange bedfellows, especially since De Mornschild was what they call a white Russian.
And those are basically known as the right wing types who really wanted to go after Russia and reclaim it.
So, there are so many inconsistencies there just with the setup of how they presented Oswald to us.
But something strange that came up was that Bob Dylan came out of retirement after eight years in retirement, and he did a 17 minute song about the JFK assassination, showing the aspect where, you know, basically indicating how the CIA removed the president.
And this really shocked the establishment because it went to number one, and it was quite remarkable.
We haven't seen much of Bob, but here he was claiming that one last shred of dignity from the 60s by exposing the Kennedy assassination.
Quite remarkable the timing on this.
I think it tells us a lot in terms of the zeitgeist because we're right in the middle of this very strange state control being activated.
And on one hand, and then we find ourselves, they started to come out with strange UFO stories right in the middle of this.
The Pentagon released.
The same stuff that was released a couple years ago, the really bad gun footage of these UFOs.
And the gun camera footage is some of the worst UFO footage I've ever seen in my life.
It was, in fact, released in 2007 on YouTube, of all places.
So, this is, wow, how super secret can you get?
So, DeLong and Louis Elizondo from TTSA brought this out through the New York Times in December of 2017.
And the New York Times didn't do any fact checking on this at all.
They just ran the story through in these.
Harry Reid, because the UFO op is part of this, the ops that are going on.
And so, in the middle of this, they rolled this out.
But the other thing is, the other thing that got rolled out was that Bob Dylan put out a song about the JFK assassination that's 17 minutes long and went to number one.
This is a very odd, unusual occurrence.
And we have to kind of stop and take stock of what's happening there.
Because music, remember, has that tremendous power.
And that's why it's been so corporatized and held back.
Because if you get a movement going on that side, Then it tends to reach a lot of people even faster than the media will.
A couple of other unusual things that have started to arise, which is the presence of RFK Jr. inside the debate around the death and assassination of his uncle and his father, RFK Jr.
RFK.
Now, RFK Jr. came out and openly started talking about how Thane Eugene Caesar was his dad's assassin.
Thane Eugene Caesar was a security guard.
Who was at the Ambassador Hotel, who was behind Kennedy.
And the coroner said that whoever shot him was right behind him point blank.
And the only person who was there with a gun was Thane Eugene Caesar, who, after a short period of time, went to the Philippines.
Well, it came out that RFK Jr. actually, in recent months, before he died, before Thane Eugene Caesar died in the Philippines, had reached out to him and said, I want to talk to you.
I know you were involved.
And Thane Eugene Caesar said, Well, I will talk to you, but it's going to cost you.
And also, like, I can't be extradited.
So he wanted, he was.
Cost you?
What did he mean by that?
He wanted to be paid off.
And was he?
Well, first his request was $10,000 and then it went up to $20,000.
Well, 10 doesn't seem like a lot.
I certainly think he was feeling it around.
And although I guess that might kind of keep you going in the Philippines.
Yeah, I'm sure it's an inexpensive place to live.
No question about it.
But this is very interesting because Thane Eugene Caesar now had only gotten a job as a security guard.
Three days before the Kennedy assassination.
Again, like Oswald being placed as a patsy on this motorcade route, these people know how to place people where they need them to be.
In Oswald's case, as a patsy who had nothing to do with the assassination, Thane Eugene Caesar's case, the trigger man, with Sirhan, Sirhan, mind controlled, shooting bullets off and distracting everybody.
And then, you know, them finding the notebook saying RFK must die and all this kind of thing.
All MK altered out, as we explored in the last episode.
Now, When we take a look at the situation of Thane Eugene Caesar, as he was going in and trying to get money from RFK Jr., something interesting happened.
He died.
Now, he was no young man.
He was, I believe, 81 when he died.
So, you know, certainly natural causes possibility, but it is strange, let's face it.
And he was on that level.
He didn't say, oh, this is a crazy idea.
I'm not going to talk to you about it.
He said, I'll talk to you, but I can't be extradited, and you can't, you know, basically you have to pay me.
So, but the emergence of RFK Jr. on these issues is significant because starting in 2015, he started to raise the possibility that some other force was involved in the assassination, breaking with a long tradition of Kennedy's just staying out of the fray of their family's assassinations and talking about them in terms of how the CIA had committed them.
This is a major sea change.
But now we see also that RFK Jr. has arisen as the major opponent to this vaccine push, the mandatory vaccine, where instead of taking six vaccines, you take 78.
You're full of all this stuff and you have every health problem in the book, but they make lots of money and you get installed with all these nanoparticles.
So, you know, here we have two factions going at it, and the Bill Gates faction.
Coming out head to head with RFK Jr.
As a matter of fact, when Trump first got into office, and Trump is a big part of tonight's show, when Trump first got into office, he offered RFK Jr. to be on a panel to study the autistic elements around vaccination and how vaccine injury causes autism, which is majorly controversial.
But there's so much good science and so many studies behind that.
And they had a good rapport.
And then Bill Gates came along and really.
Played Iago from Othello into Trump's ear and was like, he'll take you down, he'll make you look bad on this.
I'm the one to trust me.
And I think Trump might be seeing through gates now, though, because they're starting to attack Trump because he didn't go all the way into the op.
He hung out on the op until it was good enough to make him look good.
And then he stepped back and he's like, open the country up, which is the last thing in the world that they want.
So the lockdowns are a mentality.
Remember that fear.
Is a control mechanism, and um, you know, so much of the illness itself is generated around the fear.
And you know, for people who are legitimately dealing with health issues, it's always very difficult, but the propaganda layer on top of it is just undeniable.
I have a juicy question from Scarlet Fire about RFK Jr.
Uh, did RFK Jr. announce his run for president today to defeat Trump, as I heard him say?
Did were you aware that he sort of That he announced he was running for president?
Well, in a subtle way.
Did they tip his hand at all?
No.
Okay.
No, as far as I know, RFK Jr. has no plans for running for president, but he did want to work with the administration to get them up to par on environmental issues, one, and on this vaccine issue, for sure.
So, but if you have a link for that, send it over, Red Rover.
Well, I mean, what are they going to do about Biden?
He couldn't even take his mask off?
It's really sad.
Well, we have a very interesting situation there.
Because you've got somebody who clearly has not got mental faculties to be running for president.
He'll never make it through debates.
He'll never make it through public events.
He can't speak.
He can't articulate.
They're starting to have his wife talk for him.
No, they're planning on replacing Biden.
You know, I've posited that what they're planning is a unity ticket.
And my original people that I chose for this were.
Oh, there it goes again.
There it goes again.
We're losing a bulb.
Replacing the Current President00:03:25
Something interesting happening there.
Okay, so far so good.
Okay, I'm going to exit for a minute.
I'll be right back.
Okay.
One of the things I would say is that John Kerry and Mitt Romney were the two.
And I showed a kind of a tapestry of background connections with the two of them and what the media was doing promoting the two of them.
And also saying, look, we've had this situation where.
You know, Romney was the only person out of that whole bunch who voted against Trump and for impeachment.
Yeah, that's all set.
That's all set.
That's good.
No, it's definitely not the thing.
I'm sure it's a power surge of some sort.
Everyone, we're having an interesting, the lights are going kind of on and off here.
So if the lights go out, you know, when they go back on, we'll try to join the live stream again.
So if we have any problems, you've been warned.
So, yeah, but this was the unity ticket, and it had been tried before actually in the time of Lincoln.
And Lincoln had done it with his vice president Johnson.
They had formed the Republican Democrat ticket in order to portray unity.
And this was the idea that was being floated in the background.
And we had done some reporting on that just before all this hit.
And another very suspicious thing that went down was that during the election period, we were seeing candidates dropping left and right after swearing they were going to stay in.
You know, Budigig and Warren and Klobuchar, really some of the most unimpressive candidates I've ever seen take the stage looking for the presidential job.
And they're never that impressive.
Who did you just mention today?
I can't even think of her.
Who is it?
The one in Cambridge.
Elizabeth Warren.
Elizabeth Warren, I forgot she existed.
She's completely forgettable.
Well, it's interesting, right?
Because they promoted her very heavily on the media side.
And they moved this whole thing out about Elizabeth Warren.
But once it got to the ballot box, nobody was going for it because she was just really far out there.
She was talking about how she was going to get a 12 year old trans child to give her advice about, like, she was going to promote, like, a trans czar or something.
You know, this is, you know, these were the people who were standing up and just making these bizarre proclamations that had nothing to do with reality.
And they were promoting all these unusual positions that had nothing to do with the day to day lives of the people that they were dealing with.
As a ticket, the Democrats were going down hard and they rallied on the establishment side around Biden.
But I don't think that they're trying to get Biden in across the finish line in his half-wit state.
I think that they intend to replace him and there's hesitancy about how to do it.
Possibly even the Tara Reid thing was kind of a trial balloon about, you know, we can move him out of the race this way.
But I think the camp that's against him is not the Republicans.
I think the Republicans would love to run against Biden actually.
But I think the camp that's against him are on the Democratic side because they want something else.
Tesla Trump Time Capsule00:15:02
And they've been floating all kinds of weird things about the Michelle Obama thing.
Oh, nice.
Michelle Obama doesn't have any qualifications to be president.
You know, let's think about this a little bit.
Really, being first lady is an interesting job, but it doesn't give you the kind of experience you need to be president.
I would say not by a long shot.
Everyone, you're watching The Dark Journalist Show.
We're here in X Series.
This is the JFK Stealth Archives, the assassination records that, according to the JFK Records Act, were supposed to be out in 2017, but Trump didn't go for it.
And let's look a little bit at some interesting comments that Trump made around this to kind of give us an idea.
So, back here, Trump boasted he'd opened all the JFK files, but now says he can't.
This is a very crucial backing off.
And the story goes that he was going to release all the records, and the leader of the FBI and the leader of the CIA came into his office that morning and said, You cannot do it.
Citing all these different reasons, national security, et cetera.
Of course, if our national security was threatened by showing that the CIA assassinated President Kennedy, then they don't want to bring that kind of transparency.
There's no other reason to hide it unless they are up to no good.
So, from the article now, This is AP.
President Donald Trump boasted last fall that he would open all remaining John F. Kennedy assassination records.
And so far, Trump hasn't made good on the great transparency he promised then.
Trump announced on Thursday that the public must wait another three years or more before seeing material that must remain classified for national security reasons.
So Trump dropped the ball there because he has the CIA in a position where they've been so against him that he could make them look bad.
Instead, we're in this very push pull situation where he basically let them off the hook and went along with this.
So now, if he turned around and let them out, they could use his own words against him and say, like, hey, you're the one who said it wasn't.
Right to release them.
The National Archives released its last batch of more than 19,000 records on Thursday, but an undisclosed amount of material remains under wraps because Trump said that the potential harm to U.S. national security, law enforcement, or foreign affairs is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest of immediate disclosure.
I couldn't disagree more.
He ordered the CIA and other agencies to take another look at each blacked out section of their documents during the next three years to see what can be released.
Yeah, so that's going to take a while.
CIA spokesman said the agency had already released most of the CIA information.
Most, yeah, not by a long shot.
So now what's interesting is that Trump came out today with a very interesting comment.
He said, and I quote, I learned a lot by watching Richard Nixon.
Now, this is extraordinary for the fact that people who are in the presidency don't like to compare themselves to Nixon because Nixon really went down.
Disgraced after all and resigned the office.
Right, it's a toxic comparison.
It's quite unusual.
And what we have, I think, with Trump doing this is he is signaling that relationship in the open.
Now we have brought that relationship forward.
In New York, Trump got a letter from Nixon saying you should run for president and you'll win, predicting he'd win.
One.
Two, Trump set it up so that Nixon would have an office in Manhattan where he could visit and hang out with.
Him.
He got lots and lots of information.
He was interested in the presidency back then.
That's 1988.
And it was that Bush versus Dukakis election that he first got interested in could I run?
And Nixon gave him a lot of details and a lot of background.
But what he's saying here is that I learned a lot by watching Richard Nixon.
This is interesting to me because that relationship has kind of been in the background.
Although the letter where Nixon told him you should run for president and you'll win.
Is hanging in the Oval Office.
So we think about the impact of that.
But Nixon, as we'll recall from the deeper explorations we've done in this program, he had great knowledge of the UFO file and he had a great program around promoting alternative energy.
And this is really quite remarkable because the alternative energy that he was developing at Pine Gap was meant to replace and take us off the oil paradigm back then because we had a huge Arab oil crisis in 1973 and these guys were looking around at each other and saying, What if the Arabs pull the plug?
We'll get involved in a war.
We have to roll out that alternative energy stuff that we have.
All of this results in the big kind of craziness of Watergate that gets him thrown out of office.
But what's interesting is Gough Whitlam, who is the prime minister in Australia, will also get bounced out.
And I'm thinking that they both were working on this project and that both of them needed to be eliminated.
Because what was really happening was the groups that were controlling.
The energy paradigm wanted things to go along as they were, and they were moving things around in the board.
And also, the Rockefellers, through things like the Trilateral Commission, were trying to get Nixon to sign on to a kind of NAFTA, the GATT Accords, back then.
So the GATT of the 70s looked very much like the GATT of the 90s.
That's the general agreement on tariffs and trade.
Basically, the idea is go into these foreign countries.
Throw all the farmers off their land, make them move into the cities and take over their stuff.
And so much of GATT really had that effect.
And Trump shows complete disdain for GATT, but Nixon was the first one to really push back the Rockefellers on that.
And he lived to regret it because of the way that he was taken down in a psychological and political fashion.
You know, he became the poster boy for corruption when in fact it was the CIA that was operating.
In such a clandestine and illegal manner, and they were the key components behind the taking down of Watergate.
But Nixon kind of gets his revenge in his new friendship with Trump, and he basks in that.
The question has always been with the stories that have come forward from the whistleblower Robert Merritt, who worked for the Houston Plan, which was a secret intelligence unit inside the White House for Nixon.
Robert Merritt had said that Nixon had.
Placed information about alternative energy in a time capsule message to the American people relating to UFO disclosure.
This is the really big question, which is did Nixon share that information with Trump?
Now, Trump has his own connection to that breakthrough energy, alternative energy aspect, which is his uncle John Trump.
Now, we did a very complete three hour exercise presentation on this in an episode we have.
Which is the most popular, actually, X series episode.
I think it's 400,000 views.
And that's called Tesla, Trump, and the Time Capsule.
All that information is there.
And we were the first ones to put it out in relation to the fact that Trump, his uncle, was a protege of Vannevar Bush.
And scientist Vannevar Bush, on record, was in charge of the UFO file.
So the information he's sharing with his protege there in John Trump is.
Related to the UFO file, there's no question.
So, John Trump has that knowledge.
And then we have these very unusual comments from Trump in public over and over again saying, you know, my uncle shared a lot of things with me.
He knew a lot of kind of super science, he knew things that no one else knew, and these types of things.
So, they're very leading anecdotes that he lays out there.
The other thing that happened with John Trump is that when Nikola Tesla died, the FBI.
Wanted to review his papers, but they wanted someone to go in there and keep their mouths shut.
And so they went to Vannevar Bush and said, Can you recommend somebody for this?
Who did he recommend?
His protege.
And, you know, it's interesting because there are a lot of articles covering Trump's uncle with leaving this part out, of course.
They're just kind of exploring it.
But in the Washington Post recently, they said, Trump says he shares famed uncle's science genius.
A friend says his uncle would have been horrified.
That's the Washington Post.
But it's very interesting to me because it gets again at this issue, this aspect, which is that Trump mentions the uncle a lot, saying, I basically know what my uncle knew.
And the uncle knew quite a lot, being the protege of Vannevar Bush and Vannevar Bush being in charge of the UFO file.
Plus, bringing in John Trump to review Tesla's papers after his death, I'd say he knows quite a lot.
He's probably the most.
He was probably the most indispensable man in the government for a long time.
And in fact, he got the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
And he was working very much on X ray technology and how X rays and short term microwaves can be used for communication in space.
So you see where this is going.
When Trump announces the Space Force, we're at the center of a series of moves on all these different sides.
And that's when we start to get the phony Clinton Podesta UFO op, which results in the TTSA, and that's the BS CIA thing that we talk about on this program.
You know, not because we want to be mean to the TTSA, but because, you know, on their staff, on their executive board, there's over 100 years of experience of CIA officers.
It's a CIA operation.
When you get people around UFOs who talk about TTSA and just say they want to bring the truth out from the government, they are the government.
It's a government psyop of a bunch of intelligence officers trying to work with the media who they control to do their spin and create this UFO threat idea.
Because one of the things that they learned was that Google, in their search history in 2018, found that UFOs were among the top three searches of all.
People are very, very interested and curious about UFOs, and they want genuine information.
But they've started to think after 70 years of repressing the issue and even killing people who were interested in it through a program that we've identified on this show as X Protect, which was lethal to people all the way back to Morris Jessup who were looking into the UFO file.
Anytime they got close, these people would show up dead.
So that's a very CIA kind of tactic.
But there's a very interesting element around the aerospace X technology UFO file.
Secrets, which is they take on a totally different quality.
This isn't like trying to overthrow a foreign power or something.
That's a very small, elect group that knows how to target.
And they are buffered by another group that we've identified in the show called Xshare.
And Xshare being a program that is juxtaposed to that.
They literally want to move the culture forward with the breakthrough technology and the larger understanding.
Of off world civilizations and things of this nature.
The Kennedy camp, coming out of being friends with James Forrestal, the first defense secretary who had a background in UFOs, it's well documented at this point.
And there's a number of threads with Kennedy that lend itself that way.
There are others, there are scientists, there are groups over time.
Thomas Townsend Brown is another one.
So the X Share crowd has been.
In this battle over the years.
And when I look at groups like Gates and RFK Jr., that doesn't relate to the UFO file aspect, but it relates to those ex share, ex protect groups, you know, these fronts out there fighting it out.
I think there's no question that we're looking at the same kind of dynamics.
Yes.
I have a couple great questions paired together.
So, Esoteric369Wall says Do you think that Trump might speak in code sometimes to us, especially on Twitter?
And you, Chris, wants to know what if Trump means he found Nixon's time capsule?
Yeah.
Well, the code part is always interesting.
And there's no doubt when you're at that level, there is a certain amount of code.
Unfortunately, in group settings like Q and things like that, they extrapolate too much of that out.
And they've created a sort of junk conspiracy version of it.
So you have to be very careful when you assort through those things.
Who are really great at sorting things like that out?
Like Joseph Farrell is very good at it because he's looked at things like Nazi history.
He's looked at things like military secrecy.
So, coding encoded messages in political posturing, it depends on who is giving the information out.
I see people all the time who are like on Twitter or whatever saying that, oh, Trump made a cue in midair.
He didn't.
He just waved his hand.
You have to know when to stop.
And it's hard to know when to stop.
Yeah.
And if you say, for example, we have things in space that are secret.
Really secret.
That's something, you know, and Trump has said that.
That's major.
But making a little wave that looks like a cue isn't.
So you have to discern.
And again, I always reiterate the three rules of dark journalism on this show, which is you've got the official story, which they want to stick to.
Codes and Advanced Tech00:14:39
You know, in this case, Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin, got a lucky shot off.
It was a magic bullet.
It made seven wounds, even though it came from a rifle that didn't work and had a telescope that was broken.
So that's the official story, right?
And then you get the secondary story, which is Real researchers, real journalists look at that and say, that's ridiculous.
And the media, which is on the side of the establishment, says, oh no, the secondary story people are conspiracy theory.
And there's that battle.
But then this other thing shows up and it's junk conspiracy.
You know, like the driver did it or stuff like that.
That's the junk conspiracy part and it's meant to throw the whole game off.
So people are just like, oh, I can't get enough.
I'll go back to the official version because I can't think straight.
So when it comes to codes and things like that, See, there's a whole science behind what we named this show after, which is X steganography.
So, steganography is something that's a code.
There's a science behind it.
It's been used for thousands of years.
And we can see it used through the Middle Ages.
We can see it used reemerging in the 20th century, being used to hide advanced technology.
That's where all the X planes and where all of these X programs come from.
That's where the X files come from in the FBI when looking into UFOs.
They called it SMX and then X because the X was what they're picking up again from using the steganography that required a certain level of secrecy and understanding.
So there are real codes, real secrets, and real mysteries, and then you're surrounded by a lot of junk conspiracy.
So a lot of it depends on who you work with, who you listen to, and how good your discernment is.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
This is episode X88.
We're going deep into stealth archives, looking at the JFK Records Act.
And the connections, deep connections to the UFO file, President Trump and President Nixon, and the connection between Trump and Nixon, which is quite fascinating.
We also are aware of the Nixon Kennedy aspect in this.
We've done many shows on that.
We're going to be taking questions in the second half of the program.
You can ask them all in caps, and Miss Olivia will be putting those together.
How's the vibe out there?
Great.
Generally great.
I do have a question for you.
Are you going to get around to Elon Musk and what happened with him this week?
I think we'll talk about that.
That's the first.
Okay.
Everybody wants your take on that.
Well, speaking of X, right?
First of all, Elon Musk has always been in the heart of X steganography with SpaceX.
He bought X.com, which was a site that was very much like PayPal.
And he had a baby this week.
And it was strange because Anderson Cooper had a baby on the same day or the same week.
And Boris Johnson.
Yeah, and Boris Johnson.
It's just very unusual.
Triple play.
But what was interesting was he tweeted out the name of the baby, and it was X and then AE.
And the AE now is a character in Theosophy named George Russell, who was a visionary leader of Theosophy.
And that was his mark.
So that is instantly a kind of a mystery school code that he's laying out there with X, with X, Deganography, and AE from Theosophy.
And then the next one he identified in an interview that he did and said it was the precursor to the SR 71.
Which is all that X technology.
So he's very acquainted with that aspect in X steganography and with the whole deeper aspects around it.
What interests me about him is the seeming back and forth nature of what he does, sometimes seeming like he's on the side of transparency and bringing things out, and other times, you know, doing things like launching Starlink and blocking out the stars.
So it's a mixed bag that we have going on there, but how strange to name.
His child, these different names, and you know, God bless the child.
But I would say that it's an unusual, you know, if you want to go off on codes, that's a weird one.
There's no doubt about it.
We've had a few things like that, and I would say the ex-technography has been very thick.
You think about Madonna's tour from last year, and then all of the strange codes that started coming out around her and these different celebrities.
The ex-aspect from Jeff Bezos, who appeared.
On Wired Magazine, talking about his space program, and he's there in an X. You know, this is something which, if you're following this program on a regular basis, we do shows where we really get into those X aspects.
I don't do it in every show, of course, but that aspect is always there because it's got a mystery school history that goes all the way back to the Egyptians, but it was reacquired by those forces in the 20th century that were moving.
Advanced technology through different government agencies in the United States.
And they were calling the programs X, so it would be the X 15, which still holds the speed record for a space plane, even though it was done in the 60s.
And the person behind the X technology was Walter Dornberger, who was Wernher von Braun's father, who was the father of the space program, NASA.
These are both Nazis, but they're the father of our space program.
Dornberger is particularly interesting because his protege was someone named Michael Payne, and Michael Payne's wife was Ruth Payne, and that's who Marina Oswald and Lee Oswald were staying with when all this happened.
And then all the evidence that proves that Oswald is the lone nut assassin comes out of that house, which is the house of the protege of the person who does the X technology and is a reformed, in quotes, Nazi.
So there's There are layers there that whenever you get around Oswald, you're looking directly at advanced technology connections and connections to the UFO file.
It's unavoidable.
And whenever you get around the Kennedy assassination, that aspect is sitting there in the middle of it.
There's just no way around it, whether it's the CIA memos where 10 days before his assassination, he orders the CIA to give him all the UFO files pertaining to high level cases.
We have the story, of course, that we put on record of the Watergate lawyer Douglas Caddy, who put out there that his close friend E. Howard Hunt, who was really our main, I mean, he was a major chief of operations for the CIA, a super spy.
And before he went to prison, remember that he was the one who got Caddy to rep the Watergate burglars when they first got arrested.
And then he said, you know, before he went to prison, Caddy asked him why was Kennedy assassinated.
And he said, because he was going to give the UFO file to the Russians.
So, you know, I mean, these things have been there.
They're unavoidable when we get into it.
The advanced technology part, the UFO file, the X technology, it's sitting in the middle of all these things.
And when you see them roll out a whole pandemic lockdown and all that, and then roll out, you know, old, UFO videos, and then the Pentagon saying, See, we're letting it out.
You know that there's something connected with all this, and that part of what they may be approaching is a scenario pretending that there's a UFO threat and getting us into this whole aspect, when in fact it could be connected to off world civilizations.
It could be connected to the fact that we're about to become aware of them because we're going out into space and there are all these.
Space tourism movements.
They're going to start mining the moon.
We have the Space Force.
The UFO aspect is going to become much more prominent in our face.
And so they're trying to put a spin on it before we get there, which is it's a threat.
We need money against it.
And that's where you get front groups like the To the Stars Academy, which, like I said, is all CIA people.
So it gives us some idea.
But let's backtrack momentarily and see how we got into the situation where the country.
Experienced this attack from the deep state CIA on the presidency, and then the media helped them walk down the story.
So, let's look at a couple of the agencies of doing this.
This is very interesting.
One of the people in charge of the Oswald operation was David Attlee Phillips.
And Phillips was the chief of all operations in the Western Hemisphere.
And he was somebody who was just through and through.
Committed to his role in the CIA.
And he got to a position later in life where he started to look at some of the operations that they had done.
And in relation to the Oswald part, before he died, he was writing a book.
And the book supposedly was a novel, but I want to read just a few lines from it to give us some idea of what was going on here.
Now, what's interesting is his brother went to him when he was in the hospital dying of lung cancer there in his late 50s.
And he said, Were you in Dallas on that day?
Did you do it?
And, you know, Atlee Phillips said, Yes, I did.
I was there and I did participate.
So his brother got that on the record.
Now, a lot of people have suspected Attlee Phillips because there's been this knowledge that he met Oswald in Mexico before the assassination as a way of setting him up, not as a way of getting him to do the assassination.
Apparently, what they were doing with Oswald is they were telling him that he was basically infiltrating different chains that were going to commit an assassination, and they may have been telling him that he was going to be put in the role of assassinating Castro.
So, this is quite interesting.
It's from this unpublished manuscript that David Attlee Phillips left behind.
And listen to the tone as we go through this.
Quote I was one of the two case officers who handled Lee Harvey Oswald.
After working to establish his Marxist bona fides, we gave him the mission of killing Fidel Castro in Cuba.
I helped him when he came to Mexico City to obtain a visa, when he returned to Dallas to wait for it.
I saw him twice there.
We rehearsed the plan many times.
In Havana, Oswald was to assassinate Castro with a sniper's rifle from the upper floor window of a building.
On the route where Castro often drove in an open jeep.
The CIA did not anticipate the president's assassination, but it was responsible for it.
I share that guilt.
Now, it's very interesting because, of course, Oswald was in a building with a high powered rifle.
That was the setup, but there's never been any proof that he was on the sixth floor.
In fact, all the proof is that he was on the second floor eating his lunch.
And that the rifle that they put there didn't even belong to him.
It was ordered through the mail by someone named Alec James Heidel, who we'll find out later is an alias of Lee Harvey Oswald.
But what's interesting is that basically this person in Atlee Phillips' unpublished manuscript is taking credit for creating Oswald.
And he's saying, we trained him to do this exercise.
And it's a confessional tone.
Why he would be.
Making up this novel at the end of his life before he dies and confessing to his brother before he dies that he was in Dallas and was in charge of this is interesting.
Now, he worked with a group that was infiltrating Cuba and other places in the hot zone.
And the group was called Alpha 66 and was led by Antonio Vecchiana.
Vecchiana said that he used the name Maurice Bishop.
Of course, the CIA, they always used aliases.
And he said that.
He worked with him on these anti Castro operations with militias and things like that.
But he said one of those days he brought Lee Oswald with him.
And they called him Leon.
And he remembered him very well.
And before Vecchiana died, he said, My case officer, Maurice Bishop, who was David Attlee Phillips, he was the one who brought Oswald.
That's the one I saw Oswald with.
There.
He was being put together.
Now, it's come out through the work of Jefferson Morley, who was a former Washington Post reporter, that Oswald had been tracked by the Central Intelligence Agency since 1957.
He was placed in the Soviet Union to get intel, and he basically came back here and had to pretend that he was a communist.
Their next program for him was to go into Cuba and do the same thing.
So, this is how the CIA used him, but they had to make him seem like this untouchable.
Is that as researchers got further into it and as people were put on trial for the JFK assassination in the 60s by Jim Garrison, who was the DA in New Orleans?
We found out this whole thing about Oswald, which is that he worked for all these very right wing, not left wing, aspects.
And one of the main right wingers that he worked for was Guy Bannister.
So Guy Bannister was an ex FBI agent who was the originator of the X Files.
That's where the whole term X Files comes from because he created it in the FBI.
And he was the one who followed all the flying saucer cases.
Miguel the Double Agent00:13:56
So we have a lot of strange strands as we get to Oswald by the time we get to him being accused of this assassination.
One of the strange things is someone who was sent by, he was a double agent, and nobody really understood the impact of his story.
Dick Russell, who was a great researcher and a great author, Spent a lot of time unraveling Dick Russell, Richard Case Niguel.
So, Richard Case Niguel was someone who'd grown up in an orphanage.
Remember, Oswald had spent time in an orphanage.
And he didn't have any family and he fell into the intelligence life from a very early age.
So, one of his assignments at a certain point was to pretend to the Soviets that he was selling out.
The Americans put him up to this because they wanted to see what they would offer and all the rest.
So, when he was turned like that, one of the things that the Russians did was they asked him to track Oswald because they thought that they were being set up.
And they thought that when they pinned the assassination that was going to happen, this is foreknowledge again, that they would pin it on Russia through Oswald.
So, this was his job to track Oswald.
So, when he died, the LA Times did a write up on him.
That was very interesting.
And Miguel is a very fascinating character, and the book is called The Man Who Knew Too Much.
But I'm just going to read you a little tiny bit about what was found on his person.
It's a very unusual looking guy.
I'll try to dig out a picture of him here.
Richard Case Miguel, 65, reputed double agent, who is the subject of a 1992 book, The Man Who Knew Too Much.
Miguel, a former U.S. Army captain who worked for the CIA and the KGB, was featured in a recent book, The Story.
Let's go on here.
Russell asserted that Nigel had known Kennedy's killer, Lee Harvey Oswald, before the murder in Dallas.
Of course, Oswald didn't kill Kennedy, and believed that Oswald was duped into thinking that he was working for Fidel Castro.
Now, that whole thing about Castro and the Russians killing Kennedy has always been this canard that they've put out there to deflect from the fact the Central Intelligence Agency committed the crime because.
The Russians had no motivation to assassinate Kennedy because Johnson was a much more hard line, hard right, and Kennedy was trying to reach out with Khrushchev.
They had a new policy where they installed hotlines back and forth.
And although the Cuban Missile Crisis and all these things had happened with Cuba, Kennedy had sent people down to negotiate with Castro.
So there was no, again, getting rid of the idea of these communist dictatorships getting rid of Kennedy makes no sense because Johnson, who was a hawk from Texas, was going to be much tougher to deal with.
So there's no logic in that.
Also, what's interesting is Oswald, when he was taken, you know, usually.
When assassins are taken, they say, I did this for my country, although, you know, I made this great effort.
What he said was, I was a patsy, right?
So we get the idea immediately that he's an intel agent.
He understands what's just taken place and that he's going to be the one who's going to be put on trial.
I don't think that he gets it in his head that he's going to be assassinated himself.
And I think that's why he doesn't open his mouth except to say, I don't know what's happening here.
But one of the things that I think is fascinating about Miguel is.
As he is doing this double agent stuff and tracking Oswald, a third party comes in and they start talking to him about tracking Oswald.
Now, we have the original CIA setting up Miguel to pretend he's a double agent.
Then we have this other aspect of the KGB saying, follow this guy Oswald because they're going to try to pin this assassination on us.
Then there's this other thing, and he's feeding information back to this other group.
Which is some deep state intel agency, probably X Protect.
And then he starts to get very paranoid about what's happening.
And he starts to think, oh, they're not setting Oswald up for this, they're setting me up for this.
So he walks into a bank in El Paso, Texas, and fires a round of bullets into the ceiling.
And he gets grabbed for a bank robbery, even though he was hanging around.
Now, this is September before the Kennedy assassination in November.
One of the things they find on his person is this, which is kind of hard to see.
That's literally from his belongings.
It's an ID that he had that says Lee Harvey Oswald.
He has an Oswald ID for some reason when he's grabbed.
And it has Oswald's service number.
Apparently, there's a few oddities on it.
Is it Miguel's picture or is it?
That's the interesting thing.
It is not, it's Oswald's picture.
Also, there's a picture of Miguel, who has his own ID for a military base that's close by.
So, these are the things that they find.
For some reason, he's tracking around with that.
Now, one of the things that they find on Oswald is this it's a picture of Oswald for a selective service system, but the name is Alec James Heidel.
He's been given an alias.
So, we have a kind of a confusing picture here because we've got Miguel before the assassination with Oswald's identification, getting himself out of the picture by firing these bullets into the Ceiling of a bank, which is kind of a dramatic way to do it.
Right.
And then waiting around for the cops to come.
Yes.
He wanted to get picked up.
Exactly.
He said, I don't want to be anywhere near Dallas when whatever goes down, goes down.
So he had foreknowledge.
There's a lot of people with foreknowledge before this kicks in.
There's a conversation that comes to light about these people who were talking about how the assassination would happen from an office building with a high powered rifle and how they would pick up somebody else afterwards to throw the public off.
That was in Miami 10 days before the assassination takes place.
They made sure that Kennedy didn't have a motorcade in Miami as a result of this.
And so it gets very spooky as we get right up to the trail of the assassination.
It's almost like there's doubles and there's dupes and there's all of these forces getting ready to kind of lay this story out.
Miguel kept alive, interestingly enough.
And he was released from prison and he tried to help Garrison in the late 60s get to the bottom of all this.
How did he help Garrison?
He went and that scene where he meets Mr. X, although it is Fletcher Proudy who they're referring to as the character, the meeting is Miguel's meeting.
Wow.
I didn't know that.
So they met in a park and they talked about these things.
And Garrison said, Will you come on the stand?
And he said, No, they'd haul me off immediately.
But one of the things that they did with Miguel, which is fascinating, which is when Russell found him, he spent years sort of developing this relationship.
And then he came back and said in the 90s, he gave Niguel's name to the Assassination Record Review Board.
And shortly after that, Niguel was found dead.
Now they said natural causes and all the rest.
But Niguel's testimony in this situation, again, would have implicated the CIA.
So we have all these series of deaths around the Kennedy assassination and around these investigations, each one.
Around the Warren Commission, there were a whole series of deaths.
Around the House Assassinations Committee, there's a whole series of deaths, including George DeMarshall.
And it's always like suicides that are things that are meant to look like suicides.
Or in the case of Johnny Roselli, who was a pilot who had knowledge about this and had worked for the Mafia and the CIA, he was found in a drum in Florida somewhere in the ocean.
So they knew how to take care of these people.
It was like, Sam Giancano was a mafia guy, and they found him all shot up.
So, those committees really, there were always this swirl of deaths.
There's a huge death list.
And the ARRB, by the time they got to that in the 90s, which is the same group and the same legislation that mandated that the records get released in 2017, and then Trump should have done this October 26th, that's the same group where these other deaths start occurring.
And Miguel is one of the deaths on this list.
But he's a very strange story because He gives us that understanding that other people were tracking how Oswald was being set up before it happened.
That's crucial.
Because Oswald was trying to be an intelligence asset, and he thought he was doing great.
Oswald, there's no proof that he had done anything.
They came up with all these things afterwards that he shot General Walker, or he attempted to shoot General Walker, and all this stuff.
There's never been any proof that Oswald did anything except work.
You know, as a Marine, that he was part of the Marines and that the CIA, he was a CIA asset.
That's the only thing that we know, really.
We don't have any proof that he committed assassination.
Oswald is an interesting case in the sense that at the age of 15, he's in the Civil Air Patrol unit.
And in that Civil Air Patrol unit, he is taken under the wing of David Ferry.
He does a lot of psychological operations for the CIA and he's a hypnotist.
So, right away, we have a very intriguing set of circumstances for Oswald.
But this is how they get Oswald in the door.
Now, a few more facts that I think are important.
The person who created the Civil Air Patrol and therefore has access to all of those agents was someone named D.H. Byrd.
And D.H. Byrd was an oil man who was the cousin of Admiral Byrd who discovered Antarctica.
And D.H. Byrd has a very interesting thing in his background, which is that he owns the Texas School Book Depository, where Oswald will be firing off, supposedly.
Now, When they get there, the police get there and go up to the sixth floor because they're directed up there by this witness who disappears.
They go up there and they find a gun, and the gun that they find is not a Manliker Carcano, it's a 7.65 Mauser.
So the sheriff's deputy, Roger Craig, looks at it and he's with another cop named Seymour Weitzman, and Weitzman looks at it and he owns a sporting goods shop and he said, Oh, it's a Mauser.
So that's what they found.
By the time they're downstairs giving their report, it's announced that it's a Mamluk or Korkano, which is the one that's associated with Oswald, and that he ordered it under a phony name and all this stuff.
So they did all of that chicanery at the scene of the crime.
And then they have the thing about Oswald is on the run.
Again, they say that he shoots Officer Tippett, but there's no good evidence for it.
As a matter of fact, all the evidence around it is interfered with.
For example, they find these shells at the scene of the crime, and the officer engraves his name on the shells so that he can track the evidence.
And when they give him back the evidence, he said, Oh, that's a different caliber of bullet than the ones I made the marks on.
And my marks are gone.
So instantly, right away, they have to do this very quickly to formulate it.
They can't let any loose ends exist.
So we have the whole thing that plays out, and then Oswald is dragged before the press at midnight, and Ruby's.
In there in the audience, and two days later, Ruby shoots him in the morning when they're transferring him to jails.
So, we get into the flow of how they were able to kind of pull this off.
Now, one of the things that they used, which was interesting, was there's a picture of Oswald in his backyard holding a rifle and holding a pistol.
Years later, in 1968, the widow of one of the policemen involved found a very strange picture.
In her husband's belongings.
And it's this weird cutout of someone in their backyard.
So it's the cop practicing how to look like Oswald before they actually made the bogus picture of him with the rifle and all the rest of it.
So these are the threads that help us to understand the op around Oswald.
Now let's meet the mastermind who created the Oswald project and how he was left out.
Even of the JFK Records Act.
The Oswald Project Mastermind00:11:39
You know, when people say, we want all the records from the CIA, and Congress says, okay, they're mandated, let's let them go out October 26, 2017.
These records weren't included because nobody knew that he even existed.
Until the late 90s, there's a reporter who's working for the Washington Post, and through a series of unusual mishaps, he learns that there was a group operating out of Miami called the Dre.
And that they were interested in this anti Castro propaganda.
And what happens is when he goes there, he finds that they're reporting to someone.
And the person is using a routing number as a name.
And so he hunts down the name and he hunts down the name and he talks to different people associated with it.
And some of them start to get nervous who are former agents or former secretaries involved with the CIA.
And it turns out that it's a very unusual figure who was.
The chief of psychological operations for the CIA, and that is George Joe Nitties.
Joe Nitties has a very unusual career because no one ever knew that he even existed.
Number one.
Number two, now that he is known to be existed, the CIA has resisted giving up any records about him because he's not included in that mandate from Congress about the records.
Because since no one knew about him, they couldn't say, We want those records of George Joe Nitties.
Now, as we go into the history of Junides, not only was he in charge of the Oswald project in the early 60s during the assassination, but later investigations in the late 70s, the House Assassination Committee, he's the liaison with the people who are working on the committee on the CIA side.
He's the one who's controlling the leads that they get.
So, in essence, he's the person who creates the psychological operation of Oswald and Munham.
And then when people go to break that, Mirror image, that narrative, there he is, feeding them just the stuff that they can get.
Now, interestingly enough, there's three or four unusual things about Joe Annides we can bring out here.
One of them is that Joe Annides is, as a CIA agent, especially someone who was active during the period of Oswald and the assassination, he is disqualified immediately because the House Assassination Committee.
Said directly to the CIA, Your liaison can't have anything to do and cannot have been an agent during that period.
So immediately, when they use him, they've lied to that entire committee.
Later, the people in charge of that committee would say, We thought the CIA was playing straight with us, but no, now they renounced everything that they got from the CIA.
So all of those things that came through the House Assassinations Committee that they were getting from the CIA were totally bogus because our friend Joe Annides, who was in charge of psychological operations.
He was the one feeding them.
Can I make a little point here?
Yes.
Hold up his picture for a second.
Yeah.
Just to prove there's nothing new about psychopathic nerds.
Right?
We think that this is a new thing we're dealing with here.
They've always been with us.
We've dealt with them for a long time.
Let's look at his history a little bit here.
He's Greek, born in Greece.
George Shuanidhi is the son of a journalist who was born in Athens, Greece.
1922, which would have made him about 40 during the assassination.
His family arrived in New York in 1923.
After graduating City College, he received a law degree at St. John's University.
Moved to Washington in 1949, working for the Greek Embassy Information Service.
So he comes out of a foreign intelligence service.
He joined the CIA in 1951 and later became chief of psychological warfare, chief of psychological warfare, not just an officer, but the top man.
The CIA's JamWave station in Miami.
In this role, he worked closely with the DRE, which is a directorio revolutionary, and I won't try to pronounce that last one, Istundientel, I think it is, a military right wing anti communist, anti Castro group.
This was the group that Lee Harvey Oswald was in contact with in New Orleans.
Now, Oswald had approached this group to get information on their background.
And my interpretation of what was happening here is that this, Character, Joe Annides, was playing both sides.
He was sending Oswald in to infiltrate this group and he was having them watch him.
And what will happen is this group, as soon as the assassination happens, runs an ad saying that Oswald is guilty before anything else happens instantly.
So putting it out there, this is our man.
Now, when Kennedy is assassinated, Richard Helms appoints John Witten to undertake the agency's in house investigation.
After talking to Wynn Scott, who is the CIA station chief in Mexico City, Witten discovered that Lee Harvey Oswald had been photographed at the Cuban consulate in early October 1963.
Now, what's interesting is neither of these tapes nor the pictures ever surfaced.
The CIA just said that it happened.
And in fact, they had pictures, but the thing was, it wasn't our Oswald.
It was this strange double who was running around to these embassies saying, I have to get into Cuba, Cuba this, Cuba that.
So when Oswald is grabbed later, They can say, oh, he was trying to do it for Castro.
So it was a very neat package, the way that they put it together.
Now, interestingly enough, as I said, the Washington Post reporter, Jefferson Morley, he gets fired because they don't want his story.
And they're like, you know, this is something that we just aren't going to deal with.
So he goes off on his own and starts doing his own material.
What is the pretext that they use of firing him?
I think that he's just stuck on doing the story and they don't want to do it.
It's a disagreement.
But the.
The JFK records suit test CIA secrecy of assassination.
This is the headline that happened as a result of this.
And what Morley did is quite interesting.
Morley sued the CIA for Joe Anniddy's records, not for these records that everyone is chasing after Trump for to release.
Joe Anniddy's, remember, wasn't even known, so nobody could have included those records.
Now we know who Joe Anniddy's is and that he was not only in charge of psychological operations.
That he was in charge of the Oswald project.
The answers, not that they put these in the files, but as we explore Joe Anniddies, we're going to get the answers about how they crafted the Oswald narrative and basically sold it to the public and then bumped Oswald off before he could say anything.
Now, a couple of interesting things here actually, Joe Anniddies is getting the highest accommodation.
That the CIA can give, which is the Career Intelligence Medal.
And it's being administered to him by Admiral Bobby Ray Inman.
What year is that?
That is in 1979.
Okay.
So Joe Anidis is not with us any longer.
No, he's dead.
But he had just finished being the liaison for the House Assassinations Committee.
So he had a job well done.
First, he had done the Oswald Project, and now.
All the psychological operations, and now he had fooled the House Assassinations Committee.
So let's take a look at the gentleman who's giving him the award.
And this is somebody who, as the deputy commander of the CIA, has to participate in the nomination for the award and all the rest.
That is Admiral Bobby Inman.
Now, what's interesting about Admiral Inman is that he's very, very centrally associated with the UFO file, oddly enough.
So, this version that we have now of To the Stars Academy, where they're like, we have all these CIA people and they want to give everyone love in the UFO file.
Well, the first version of that, the first disclosure guy out of the CIA was Bobby Ray Inman, who, by the way, is still alive.
And Has been more transparent on this story than most.
Now, interestingly enough, in Joseph Farrell's book, Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery, the Fascist International, 9 11, and Penetrated Operations, which is a fascinating book of Farrell's, and I don't know how many people who know Farrell's work know that he did a very interesting, deep overview on 9 11.
But one of the things that's in there is it has to do With this kind of high technology that's riding through all of the stories around 9 11.
But in the heart of it is Admiral Bobby Ray Inman from when he was deputy director of the CIA.
When he leaves the CIA, he starts working with someone named Bob Oshler.
And Oshler is somebody who will bring the whole disclosure idea from the government in the 80s.
He'll bring this whole idea around.
In his interview, Auschler asks Bobby Ray Inman, Do you anticipate that any of the recovered vehicles, UFOs, would ever become available for technological research?
He has a whole interview with him about UFOs.
And then he says, Do you suspect that any of these crashed UFOs are going to ever become available to the public for research outside of military circles?
Inman says, Again, I honestly don't know.
10 years ago, the answer would have been no.
Whether as time has evolved, they are beginning to become more open on it, there's a possibility.
Again, Mr. Heinemann, who he is saying is someone that the government is a liaison who could talk about this, probably would be the best person to put that question to.
And they have this back and forth where they talk about Timothy Goode and UFOs, and Auschler gives him other questions.
What I want to kind of gravitate us around on this, though, is that the same person who's giving the medal to Joe Annides is the same one who becomes the UFO.
The face of UFO disclosure in the 1980s, Bobby Ray Inman, working with Auschler.
And Auschler went pretty far on this.
If you look at the programs that were around, all of the late 80s programs on aliens were directed by Auschler.
Now, what's fascinating too is that Bobby Ray Inman, working closely with Joan Nitties, and what is Joan Nitties?
Joan Nitties is like their in house MKUltra specialist.
Joe Annides Central Figure00:02:31
Warfare.
Remember, he's not just doing psychological operations, he does psychological warfare.
He's a chief of psychological warfare.
He's the person in charge.
He's the person locked in around the Oswald Project on the summer before the assassination, setting it up, setting up the parameters.
Now, Jefferson Morley, who found out about this, couldn't get any traction at the Washington Post, even though he found this incredible blockbuster.
So he decided to sue the CIA.
Now, The lawsuit has been in play for 10 years.
And it's called.
Oh, you mean it's still at a standstill?
Wait, yeah.
This is the remarkable thing about it.
But Joe Nitties becomes the central figure in that case.
This is the case.
And it is literally Jefferson Morley, the journalist who was formerly with the Washington Post, versus the United States Central Intelligence Agency.
And he's also trying to win back the costs, the attorney's costs, and things like that.
How he's been able to keep it going is kind of a miracle.
And, like, you know, it has, in a way, you know, sort of like.
So many things.
It has no business being active, and yet it is somehow.
15 year lawsuit drags over as mysterious CIA agent drags as final files await release.
There it is.
Joe Annitti's story just hanging out there in the middle of the public.
And it says For 15 years, journalist, author, and assassination expert Jefferson Morley has fought to compel the CIA to produce records about longtime spy George Joe Annitti's, who worked with a group.
Associated with John F. Kennedy's assassin, and then aided the committee that tried to investigate that killing.
Morley returned to federal court today, this time before a three judge appeals court panel to get the government to pay for legal fees that have climbed to more than half a million dollars.
That's quite remarkable.
Now, there's a quick overview that Morley gives of why the Joannetti's thing is so crucial, which I think is important enough.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
We're here on episode X88.
And how are you doing out there, Masilovic?
Doing great.
I'll tell you, Ed Kaufman, I'm sure he would love to sit down with you.
He's got tons of questions.
UFO Researchers and Pandemics00:15:14
All right.
You can go for one.
For one, God, which one's okay?
So, is it possible that Gordon Novell was an Oswald double?
And do you think that he could have been the umbrella man in Dealey Plaza?
Well, he definitely was a double.
There's no question about that.
And he also infiltrated the.
Garrison hired him because he came to him saying, I'm an electronics expert and I can give you my services to debug your place and your agents and stuff and make sure they stay protected.
And instead, he bugged the place.
And what's interesting is that Novell had a connection with the guys who would do Watergate later.
So that is a very interesting kind of deep state operation.
All those people were good at electronics, which was pretty handy, especially in that period of time.
It wasn't like now when it's so easy to bug somebody.
You know, you basically just hack their phone or hack their computer.
Back then, you had to go into their place, break in, plant the bugs, and leave.
Yes.
Yeah, one more question.
So I love this one.
May Brussels thought the Young Americans for Freedom organization formed by William F. Buckley was involved in the JFK plot.
What do you think?
Well, it's interesting because Douglas Caddy is part of setting up the Young Americans for Freedom.
And there's no question that William F. Buckley was a CIA agent.
But I think that Young Americans for Freedom had a lot of conservatives around it.
But the CIA part, there's no question that people like Buckley and E. Howard Hunt were associated.
And E. Howard Hunt, now I'm trying to think about what Caddy told me.
I think he said that Hunt was the godfather of Buckley's children.
So, you know, we think about these connections.
But it's also fascinating when you think about Buckley because he has his own show.
He's a big public figure and all the rest of it.
But he's a CIA guy.
So that's how the CIA needed to be in everyday life in order to control these narratives.
And we get that with celebrities now, too.
Whenever we see, you know, like the pandemic had all of these people like Tom Hanks or whoever else they paraded out, Madonna, who was promoting the pandemic, they have to get these people on board in order to convince everyone that everything's okay.
I mentioned that you're watching X Series 88, but I also want you to go and sign up for our newsletter at darkjournalist.com because one of the things.
That we've been finding is people are getting thrown off.
Well, look at David Icke.
Yeah.
Okay.
So they threw off Ike when he did the big interviews, saying that he didn't believe in the propaganda around the COVID virus.
Okay.
And so instead of just saying, well, there's that point of view, there's this point of view, no, lockdown, boom.
You know, and we've seen this with people standing up.
Candace Owens, she got her Twitter account suspended for saying that, you know, You needed to look deeper on this, and we're in this kind of a siege on the media side, on the government side, where they're doing this.
But a lot of that effort and input is coming from the social media companies.
So, the best one of the best ways we can stay in touch with each other is if you guys sign up for the newsletter and make sure that we have that one on one connection ready to go.
And basically, what will happen is once a week you'll get a free newsletter, and there's not a lot of marketing in it actually, it just tells you.
What episodes are coming up, and the incredible lineup of guests that we have coming for you in May.
You're not going to want to miss that.
So make sure that you're signed up for the newsletter.
And also, you can sign up, you can subscribe to Dark Journalist and get behind the program.
That kind of effort really pays off.
So that's something that we definitely appreciate.
Now, before we go on to the next section, which we were corrected, it's William F. Buckley was godfather to E. Howard Hunt.
Yes.
Okay.
And Josh Randall says there's a great firing line episode with them both.
Which, if we can get it on YouTube, Hunt and Buckley?
Hunt and Buckley.
Yes.
Everybody's laughing at me because I admitted that I have a crush on William F. Buckley.
I always have.
I don't know what it says about it.
Well, you know, the guy was like the smartest guy on the planet.
There's no question about it.
Yeah, Caddy had a very, you know, he definitely knew a lot about Buckley.
And since he was best friends with Hunt, that whole thing, it's an incredible knowledge base that he has about that.
Now, Let's take a look at a couple of these pieces and try to put them together.
So, we saw this, and I mentioned this that during this pandemic propaganda stuff, they put this out, which is the same video, the bad footage that they use for every UFO story now.
It's mandatory that they use this thing because it's officially sanctioned.
Don't use real pictures of UFOs, use this little weird dot and gun camera footage.
And this originally, some of these films, Actually, it came out in 2007, like I said, on YouTube.
So they've been floating around for a long time.
There's no revelation around this at all.
And then the New York Times did that whole promo with Lou Elizondo and that whole phony op in December of 2017 with DeLong and all that.
And then DeLong came out and did shows like Joe Rogan and collapsed.
The op collapsed and then it came back because they have infinite money to keep doing these things.
But what they are all about and the whole Harry Reid.
Pushing them is they want to become part of the stationary part to receive regular funding and create a branch to deal with this UFO threat, you know, so they can do all kinds of things with it.
And that's a whole op that has been generated.
But nonetheless, they took the time to release Pentagon releases UFOs on record.
Now, these videos, as I said, had already been out there twice because 2007, 2017.
And here they are saying, wow.
And everyone was acting in the media like, it's a new release.
Look at this UFOs, blah, blah, blah.
Here's the same bad footage again.
There's great footage of UFOs out there.
I see much better.
You know, just things that people post on YouTube taken from their phone are better than that.
So, remember, on this program, we take the UFO file very, very seriously.
The cases, the case histories are so important.
But the entire subject is wide open because it's not regulated at all to all sorts of psychological operations, such as what Joe Annitties did.
Remember, he was a psychological warfare expert.
And there he is with Bobby Inman, who is the CIA disclosure man of that period, the 80s.
So, we never want UFO disclosure from the CIA.
That's the first rule.
That's why when we have UFO researchers who go to bat for the TTSA and are like, you have to love Elizondo.
He suffered so much.
He sacrificed for all of us.
I think it's the tattoos.
He must have suffered while getting the tattoos.
But he, you know.
I'm unapologetic about this.
I'm sorry.
Yeah.
Well, their TV program and all the rest, I don't think that, you know, it's such a setup, the whole thing.
So.
Those people who do real UFO research, they know better than to cozy up to a CIA operation.
All we have to do is say on the executive board, it's not a conspiracy theory, look it up, it's a fact.
The To the Stars Academy has over 100 years of CIA experience.
That's deep, deep state.
And it's an intel group.
They're not trying to get the truth from the government, they are the government.
So, they're a well funded operation and they come out of the Clinton Podesta wheelhouse of weirdos.
So, yeah, so the independent world should be very smart on the TTSA side.
If you find people cozying up, it's because in the background TTSA is saying, you'll get on our program, we'll help you promote books, it'll become a big movement, it's worth it, go along with us.
And it's not.
By the way, you know, this is funny too, because a lot of UFO researchers know that the CIA has been the biggest block.
And psy opera around the entire subject.
So, why would you start trusting the CIA all of a sudden?
It's very strange.
And then, second of all, they have a reputation of using people, squeezing them out like a lemon, and moving on.
So, I wouldn't trust anything that they had to say.
So, no CIA disclosure.
Go for real UFO disclosure.
You have real, genuine researchers, and there's a rich vein of material to work with.
There's no reason for any intelligence interference on the CIA front.
Okay, now more connections.
Was that enough?
That was fun.
How is it going out there?
Going great.
I think a lot of people are eager to have you talk about you know what.
So, are we going to actually get to?
Which one?
Well, COVID 19.
Oh, no, no, no.
Well, tonight's show is not really about that.
And we've been talking about it as we go along.
I mean, we've talked about the lockdowns and such, but.
We've been keeping a very close eye on it.
But, you know, having it.
Well, you could do a second show because, you know, you and I rant about this concept.
No question.
The way that it's playing out, I will say this, which is they think that they have aspects of the op in place.
And then there are other overreachers, like Gretchen in Michigan.
And there are others too that tell us maybe, like Gavin Newsom.
And now we have Governor Cuomo.
And what he wants to do is forget about and wipe out all of the school programs in New York City.
Forget about going to school in a building.
You're just going to do it virtually.
And guess who his partners are?
Bill and Melinda Gates.
Hey, hey.
So, yeah, he's just waiting around for this.
But hold on.
I thought, you know, you guys were knocking down the numbers and you're going to have a vaccine.
Why would you need to get rid of all these buildings?
Obviously, there's a big real estate push in New York and they're trying to roll this in.
And wherever you go, it's Gates and Gates and Gates.
And as I've looked into Gates and a lot of people have, he's always showing up trying to push in the past GMOs, Monsanto's Roundup.
All these different things.
It seems like his pet project is to try to move these things into the culture, and the culture just keeps pushing it back.
And this time he really thinks that he has people.
And he's working with that incredible network and the incredible money and power sweep.
He's just locked into it.
But the thing is that the independent media has pushed back pretty hard and convincingly on this.
So the people now, Need to take the tools like we see in the different protests and things like that and force those states open.
It's no doubt about it that the way back to any kind of sane normalcy, you know, that they've hyped this thing, they've created a fear culture.
And the way to get things back on track is to go right down the barrel and open things up, demand those governments open it up.
You know, in Massachusetts, they have this ridiculous thing where they mandate a mask.
You know, so if you don't wear a mask, you get a $300 fine.
It's absurd.
And you have all these people running around nervous with masks.
And we know, look, I brought this for tonight.
Okay.
That's the inspector general.
Okay.
A surgeon general doubles down.
Masks increase virus risk.
Why?
Because people who get sick touch their face and move the mask around and actually make themselves sick.
Fauci said, remove the silly mask.
You know, um, The mask has been turned into a symbol of control that you agree that there's a pandemic going on.
Because if you don't agree with it, they lose power.
And there may be people in situations of compromised health who are ill or elderly who may need those things, but the vast majority of the population do not.
And we've faced many things before, like flus and other situations, and we never had situations like this.
They had 100,000 dead from a flu in the late 60s.
So.
They didn't lock down the culture for that.
But I'm going to tell you about a strange story of a city being locked down in 2013 and how it relates to everything we're talking about.
As I go into that, Ms. Olivia?
I don't know this story.
I'm excited.
Just you wait.
Well, it's interesting enough because you lived right through it.
Aren't you curious?
The regional governor.
I think what's really sad, there are a lot of things that are sad about the masks, but we were talking about how we.
Can't read each other's faces.
There's no people, even with masks, even with social distancing terrible term people will not.
It's not social distancing at all, it's physical distance.
It's absurd.
People will look you in the eyes.
And you can tell when somebody's smiling when their eyes squint.
But people aren't looking at each other.
We're not seeing each other's expressions.
As far as I can see, there's no sense of actual solidarity.
People are terrified of each other and looking at each other like they have the plague.
If I walk down the sidewalk with a mask, people will walk into the street to avoid me.
And they're wearing a mask.
It's the most antisocial thing in the world.
And it makes me infuriated.
Which is what they want.
Well, they've run a fear op.
Through the media on this.
And there's no question, they're collecting a lot, a lot of data.
It's quite a data drill down at this point.
So, the way that I look at it is part of it, part of the getting us out of the morphogenic fields that we interact with, we're getting, you know, the idea of getting in between that.
Because when humans have that kind of solidarity with each other, they talk about things, and, you know, you might be facing the French Revolution.
So, therefore, it's better to split them up.
Make them afraid of each other and make them fight with each other over silly things, right?
And they've pushed the really kind of low thing.
And then on the other hand, the media is like, hey, stay home and make like quarantine sock puppets.
Society Collapse Plans00:12:24
You know, they have this whole thing going on.
The way that I look at it is that's a way to kind of entrain you to keep you in slavery.
What we need to do is, you know, first of all, nature is the best kind of thing that we could be out in to help.
Keep a healthy immune system.
That's right.
Breathing fresh air.
Yeah, being on the beach and all the rest of it.
Smelling the flowers.
The idea, and they're going to send little robots around.
We were looking at that South Korean robot thing, and it's got little things on telling you to social distance.
I said if they export that thing to America, it'll be target practice nonstop on this.
Najat just said there's a quarantine Barbie.
I can't believe it.
That's horrifying.
I expect to see more.
I expect to see more.
But the thing is, we need to move out of the mentality.
It's why, when we do this show, we don't just concentrate on the deep state aspects, but we concentrate on mystery schools and different types of ways that have moved the culture and given us tools to fight back against this kind of mind control.
And this type of entrainment around this is particularly powerful because now they've got all these people grandstanding and saying, you know.
You're risking lives if you go outside.
It's absurd.
You risk lives.
There's such a human toll from the lockdown.
It's criminal on so many levels, the way that they've done this, all to try to roll this operation out about tracking people.
And I do feel that it's criminal on a variety of levels.
And we've seen other things when you look at it, like alcoholism and domestic abuse and things have spiked because people have their economies have collapsed and because.
They've been forced into these situations.
So, we're going to see such a bigger human toll from that than from these, what are basically flu numbers that come out of the COVID virus.
What I would say is that we're getting more data as time moves.
And the thing is, as things lift to seize the initiative and really force it with these petty officials like governors, remember, governors can't make laws, legislatures make laws.
Governors say things, all right?
They're not laws, they do not have the force of law behind them.
The county commissioner who threw the salon owner in jail before the governor and the attorney general got her out, he is just a petty official.
He does not have the force of law behind him.
Governors do not have the force of law behind them.
They can put things in for when situations happen, like if a snowstorm hits, they can say, stay off the roads or whatever.
But they do not have the ability to bang a gaffle and make a law.
It's been They've created regional governors and this kind of false impression that somebody in Michigan can tell all those people what to do from there.
And her own legislature has taken her to court because they're like, we're not going along with that.
So, tearing down those petty officials, those petty officials are being put in their ear like, you'll be part of this new system.
You'll be part of this whole new thing.
The rewards will be great.
Stand there.
And what the public needs to do is disincentivize that program, push back as it moves, push back, do the protests.
Email them, send them messages to your congresspeople.
Do not let it go.
And reclaim the freedom.
The freedom comes from the Constitution, it doesn't come from any of these emergency powers or proclamations.
That, in the beginning, working with these people who I was calling the middle managers, the governors, the mayors, and all the rest of it, we understand their confusion because they were just middlemen for the whole thing.
Now, a lot of the stats are in, and all the numbers have been going down.
And also, the numbers were exaggerated because they were counting for every One death, they were counting three.
And, you know, in Virginia, they admitted that.
In New York, they said anything that looks like, you know, we don't test it, but if it looks like it, we'll do it.
So the numbers.
And there's a financial incentive.
There's a financial incentive as well.
Well, that's another thing.
When you get into health, if you have financial incentives, forget it.
But it's easier to make people afraid if you say 100,000 deaths than if you say, you know, maybe like three, 4,000 deaths and like other stuff is just the regular stuff like flu, heart disease, and all the rest of it.
You notice all those numbers and reporting have gone down as they.
Lifted up the COVID numbers.
But it was bad enough anyway that it happened, but for them to take advantage of it is criminal.
So, in terms of bringing things forward, look how they've tried to block the pandemic movie.
They do not want average people to get this.
But as average people get it, they wake up and you see more people coming to those protests and more people opening up their stores.
They need to know that they work for us and they don't have some kind of magic pill or some kind of magic bullet.
By saying, hey, there's a health crisis.
That means we get fascist powers and you do nothing but stay in your house.
And by the way, our next plan is to come in and take people out that we want to test or whatever.
That has to be stopped.
And the sea change is there.
You can feel it.
And a big piece of it is that the Trump administration, which was playing this game, has stopped playing the game.
And you don't see Fauci around there doing all that stuff.
They've moved into a different phase.
And that's very important because.
You know, I have to say this.
It doesn't matter, right, left, libertarian, none of it.
I've been called everything, by the way.
I've been called left wing, soft left wing, hard right, you know, all this kind of stuff.
It doesn't matter to me because the show doesn't really have a political angle.
The political angle is if somebody talks in public about defending the Constitution, I don't care if it's Fox News or if it's Peter Dale Scott as the ultimate.
Left coast leftist of all.
They know the Constitution and they know the rights of the people.
That's where we naturally go.
So, if you see people in the Trump administration saying, open up the states, they're the ones who are right.
And if you see people like Pelosi and Gavin Newsom saying, no, no, stay down, and we're going to send drones over you on the beach, they're the ones that are in the wrong.
I don't care what the party affiliation is.
So, that's how it works.
And unfortunately, the divide is working a lot like that during this crisis.
They're all going to make money, by the way.
So, none of them, you know, I don't salute any of them.
But, What I think is important for us to look at is the Democrats have moved into a bizarre pose where they want a kind of fascist communism blended, you know.
And it feels like the social media companies have taken so many of their cues from China that they're left hanging in the balance, thinking, oh, we thought this thing was going to go on for a long time.
We get all these powers, and these states are opening up, and that faction in the White House isn't supporting this anymore.
So now they're trying to make them look bad and be like, oh, people are dying because they're negligent.
No, people were dying because you were keeping them in their house.
And then in the middle of it, everybody's playing the game of like, oh, we're doing it safely, we're opening it safely.
The human beings' immune systems have been going on for how many?
Hundreds of thousands of years.
We've had life on planet Earth for millions of years.
I think humanity can handle it, okay, without you saying, We'll never handshake again.
No, we'll handshake again.
Get out of your weird fantasy there, power, sort of new Hitler.
It's not going to happen.
And you're going to get petty powers from this.
People are too stupid to look deep enough into what's happening or to program.
So that's what we're doing in this program, really waking people up.
Bottom line this is a country, in theory, which is supposed to be for of and by the people.
We get to decide how we want to live, what risks we want to take.
This isn't supposed to be a top down situation where things are dictated to us.
Absolutely.
And the agreement we made was to basically stay at home to flatten the curve, which is a term you don't even hear anymore.
No, this was the beginning.
That's how they lured people in.
They said, we're going to flatten the curve and then we'll give everything back.
And then they're like, oh, you all have to wear masks.
And oh, the new normal is that there's no social security.
Destroy your small businesses so you can get kicked out of your homes.
Yeah, my feeling on this is, you know.
It's going to take action on the ground, and we're already seeing it.
The move is there.
And when they say open the states, anyone who's saying open the states, that's where we go.
When people are saying close down the state or like schools should be closed forever, those are your enemies.
They're enemies of humanity because they know they've got the stats.
They're just being programmed.
So they've been enemies of this process.
The question is why?
And why did they take this thing and move it the way that they did?
Why do we have the term pandemic?
Because so many of us understand that there's a plan behind this.
And they're working right now and they're trying to create this atmosphere.
They're like, oh, the vaccine will be ready.
We don't want the vaccine.
We really don't.
We want human immunity and we want some of the other things.
They've had so many drug combinations that are cures.
And the idea of waiting around for 18 months and living like, you know, the boy in the plastic bubble.
Is ridiculous.
I mean, your society will collapse.
Literally, your society will collapse.
Well, do they want the society to collapse?
Well, that's the thing.
But I feel that there's enough forces in the America First camp that are locked in to not seeing this happen, that were not fully on board with the transhumanism and the electronic tagging and all the rest of it.
Now, there's crossover in all of these parties and in all of these stances.
So, what needs to happen is they need to get that signal from the public that things that they're not going to take.
And part of it, you've seen it in places like Michigan and in California.
Some of the best protests I've seen have been in California.
In Texas, these are the states who know what's up.
And in Massachusetts, in Boston, we had a tremendous protest last week, last Monday.
Fantastic crowd show up, much bigger than anyone thought it was going to be.
And it was right after he announced the dumb mask thing.
And you probably can tell that I'm not somebody who was going to wear a mask.
So it's one of these situations where.
They're creating these strange oppositions.
And the guy in Ohio, to his credit, he created this mandate for the mask and the $300 fine.
And then the next day, he's like, you know what?
Americans aren't going to do this because they're Americans and this is stupid.
So, you know, it's something I'm going to suggest, but it's not something that's mandatory.
That's what they need to know, which is the people who are, you know, fundamentally understand their American rights aren't going to be in some sort of weird mandated thing based on your false inflated numbers, you know.
If you want to be careful in certain situations, then that's good, you know, fine, and it's welcome.
But the thing is, I'm telling you, it's just biological because in the summer, as the months get warm, you know, people aren't going to walk around with those dumb things on their faces.
The people who do are going to look like idiots, you know?
Well, I mean, I feel like if people want me, and actually, who is the judge?
Napolitano.
Arrogant Banks in Germany00:05:26
Yeah.
So he agrees with this.
So in order to go into a shop, To wear a mask, I hate wearing one.
I'll wear it to make other people feel comfortable.
But on the street, on the sidewalk, it's the healthiest thing for me to walk around.
And if I socially distance, if I'm distant from somebody six feet away from them, I don't think I should have to wear a mask.
And we're not even going to use the term.
And we're not even going to use the term.
Fresh air.
I mean, I just, you know, I have asthma.
I like to breathe.
It's the worst thing in the world for my lungs to breathe it through a mask.
And I can't believe it.
And then, you know, but if the last day before they made it mandatory, I went around walking without a mask on then.
Dirtiest looks you've seen in your life.
Well, they've been programmed.
This is an interesting, you're in the heart of, I think it's so important, and I always recommend this book to people, which is Letters from Russia, 1917 to 1919, for P.D. Ospensky.
And he talks about the atmosphere around the Russian Revolution and how they were hearing things.
And, you know, they would hear a rumor that the cost of bread was going to go up to $10.
Everyone would go buy bread and act freaky.
It was so easy to manipulate them, and it gave pause to people like Gurdjieff and Ospensky when they would see these mass things happening.
They would say, forget everything, drop everything.
We need to understand the psychological operation involved in the human psyche if we're going to get anywhere as a culture.
We're right in the middle of that.
And I have to say that the culture has really kind of bottomed out on so many different levels.
But that doesn't mean that there's no hope for it, because there's incredible hope.
And there's so many great movements and things, and we see so much bravery in the middle of this that bringing it back around and being aware in the heart of the crisis can be a fantastic exercise that will actually leave us in better shape on the other end of it.
We've seen very strange movements, like when they were moving out Terence O'Shaughnessy as a COG commander.
And they've been really hinting a lot that Trump's valid and this other person associated with Pence had COVID virus.
They're trying to get this idea that Trump is going to get it.
They've been floating that out there.
And my feeling is that this is why they've floated this other idea of O'Shaughnessy and people like that.
So that's something that we've brought forward on this program and we're watching very closely.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
This is X Series 88.
And wow, you know, we're deep in the heart of it.
What do you got there?
As we pivot, I just wanted to give you this quote Michael Goldby says in New York, you have to wear a mask to go into a bank.
Think about that.
Read it again.
At least your banks are open because we don't have any open banks.
That's true.
ATM.
That is fascinating.
So, I want to remind everyone to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for our newsletter.
Now, that newsletter is going to come to you on Fridays when we're doing shows to let you know what the guests are and give you the link directly in your inbox.
It's free.
And basically, you know, the way that it works is you're going to get it once a week, and it's not really.
Heavy with marketing or anything like that.
So make sure you have that locked in because, you know, the kind of absurdity of everyone getting thrown off.
I mean, they've started with the really kind of major people like David Icke, Alex Jones, and people like that.
And, you know, like them or not, they have a right to do their own platform.
To de platform them shows that the society is blocking narratives.
And that's fundamentally flawed as a model in democracy, any kind of free society.
It looks ridiculous.
It looks like Stasi, you know, it looks like.
Nazi, it looks totalitarian.
That's not what we're about.
That's not who we are.
And when you see them doing that, resist.
What is that great movie about East Germany?
The People.
What is that one?
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
The People.
Yes.
I can't remember.
Yeah, that's really.
It's fantastic.
Yeah, very important.
I think the point is that in East Germany, they lived with it up close and it was more modern because people sometimes say, well, the Nazis, I can't quite think of the Nazis.
It's the 30s, it's the 40s.
But the Stasi had all this high tech equipment to track people, you know, because they were around up until the Berlin Wall fell in the early 90s.
So, you know, that's a really, the story of that really comes home a lot more.
But the way that they track people look, you have a built in system of tracking when you're dealing with Google or any of these social media companies.
They used to say, like, hey, find your friends or here's this app or whatever.
And now they're like, this information is false.
You will not post that.
You won't do this.
I mean, it's become a really bizarre system.
Bait and switch.
And what's interesting is when you think of the opening volleys of the technology and how welcoming it was, and how we're going to make your experience more efficient, and Windows 95 and stuff.
And now these people just want to be technological masters and they can't hide it.
One of the things that Catherine Austin Fitt said to me was that the old oligarchs, the old power structure like the Rockefellers and the Bushes, they didn't want to be out there and in your face about how they were taking your rights.
But the thing about the tech companies.
JFK Library Marathon Archive00:14:30
Is it like drop the mask because they are, you know, they're so arrogant and they don't want to hide how arrogant they are.
So, and so the media is always covering up for it and saying, I'm like, it's justified.
So, this is the nature of the situation that we have at the current moment.
The foundations of it can be found in the psychological operations that got us into this during these deep events.
So, the things that we've been talking about relating to George Joannides, who did psychological warfare and then his work was hidden, the lawsuit that's pending on that, if we get the records about Joannides, Probably more valuable than anything that are in the Trump held records of the CIA.
However, the Trump held records of the CIA have been mandated by Congress already to come out.
They were supposed to be released after 25 years from 1992.
They should be in the public's hands.
Trump has not fulfilled the promise that Congress gave him, and the president, whoever was the president, was supposed to open it up.
So he's allowed the CIA to play this game.
In the meantime, they've tried to dethrone him with.
Russian collusion, which is really just completely made up.
In the Steele dossier and all those people, they just released Ray Flynn because the trumped up charges against him were part of this.
So the intelligence agencies are not Trump's friend.
So those records should come out and embarrass those agencies, and those agencies should be embarrassed because they've acted illegally and they've acted illegally around the world in America and in other countries.
That kind of malfeasance should come out.
So, this is the nature of the situation.
When we get into these records, we should be applying pressure for them to come out after so many years.
There's just no justification for holding on to them.
And when you look at media outlets, when these things come up, they don't even want to talk about the JFK assassination anymore, except to float it out there with the same story that was blown away a long time ago.
I mean, even in 1979, the House Assassination Committee said it was a probable conspiracy based on all the evidence.
So, the final word from the government side is conspiracy.
It was only the Warren Commission in the 60s trying to cover it up that said it was one guy with a broken gun and a lucky shot.
And it's ridiculous.
So, that kind of absurd history that we live with dulls our senses.
And it programs us, in a sense, to get into situations like the type of deep state activity that we've seen.
You know, 9 11 was a lot like that, too.
But I'll tell you, the COVID thing is worse because the psychological.
Impact and the worldwide kind of mind control around it is much thicker than what they used on 9 11.
And 9 11 was fairly heavy duty.
Okay, so we're going to jump back in here and then we're going to take your questions.
A couple of quick things to put on the record.
Remember, I was talking about a city in a lockdown and some unusual things.
Well, you might remember during the Boston Marathon bombings.
Which were very unusual and took place in 2013.
And, you know, there were so many irregularities around it, but what happened was terrible enough.
But the responses from the FBI and what they knew about the people who were involved were very strange and left real researchers scratching their heads and saying, what's really going on here?
Well, I've talked a lot about stealth archives, and they form a foundation of what the X series is all about.
So, stealth archives.
Well, would be things like this JFK records are a great example.
The records that we know exist that could tell us something about history, that could tell us something about a topic.
The UFO file was like this also.
The Bloomfield papers relating to Permandex and their project for assassination, and how they're related.
All the letters between Bloomfield, Louis Bloomfield, who ran Permandex, and George H.W. Bush are in those papers, and they're at the center of a court case that's been going around since 2003.
We know that they're there, like the X letter at the LBJ Library.
But we can't get our hands on it because that time hasn't come when that disclosure, the Nixon time capsule, if UFO disclosure is in that, we haven't had the ability to get our hands on it.
That's a stealth archive.
We know that it's there, but we can't get at it.
Now, in the marathon bombing, something strange happened simultaneously, which has been erased from the record, and that is the JFK library.
Experienced an explosion as well.
Now, the stories at the time did come out and they said, What happened at the JFK Library?
Here's some early Twitter action.
That was the fire during the marathon bombing at the JFK Library.
JFK Library experienced an explosion and a fire that day as well.
But that's been wiped out of the record.
This was some of the damage.
Somebody posted this on Huffington Post, of all places, back then.
This is the day of the marathon at 4 42 p.m., just a little while after those bombings.
That's what they did to the JFK library.
And one of the clips I remember was the newscasters were really freaked out and they were over there, like, what's going on?
And this woman came out and she was like, everything's under control.
And the guy's like, yeah, it was a big fire, right?
She said, no, it was a small fire and it's under control.
And the guy's like, but look.
And they panned the camera and there was this huge black trail.
It was like, And she just basically ran to her car.
I remember thinking, something is wrong with that whole picture.
And I've looked into it over the years.
One of the unusual things that happened after that incident is the Carlyle Group, which is this kind of New World Order think tank, I think is a good explanation of describing them.
But Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. are both deeply involved with the Carlyle Group.
But in 2014, Just a little while after that, about a year later, they bought the JFK Library, Carlisle Group's latest acquisition.
Some things you can truly not make up, like this the museum and archive celebrating and exploring the life, although not wanting to investigate the death, of John F. Kennedy is getting a facelift courtesy of the Carlisle Group.
The development was noted without much fanfare in a variety of media.
If there is a smidgen of irony, I missed it.
Consider this the ultimate globe girdling corporation is playing a major role in preserving the memory of a president who, at the time of his death, was engaged in what may be described as a mortal combat with outfits like the Carlisle Group.
Excellent point.
So, they're so noble.
It's pretty interesting because in this article, it says, Why is the museum getting a facelift?
Apparently, it is to enhance the visual and interactive offerings.
Does none of it have to do with the still mysterious fire that broke out at the museum complex in Boston at approximately the same time as the bombings of the Boston Marathon?
Initial news reports suggested that the fire might somehow be linked to the bombings, an event that led to the precedent setting lockdown of a major American city in a military style operation.
And in fact, they did roll military vehicles during that whole period.
As with, well, practically everything about that day, we've since been assured that there was, in fact, no deeper mystery.
Regarding the museum fire, that its cause was accidental and the timing a coincidence.
And of course, it may well have been, though I was struck by what seemed like a sheepish lack of openness on the part of library personnel, just like the news report I saw, when I made inquiries, called a reporter's instinct.
So, what I think is fascinating is people like James Baker, George H.W. Bush, defense secretaries, and members of the bin Laden family.
Part of the Carlisle group, they thought that this would be a good investment of $50 million to get control of this thing.
It made me wonder, and this part is something I deduced on my own looking at the material, that there were stealth archives because what I discovered is that in the JFK library, there are files that you can access and read and photograph and record and all the rest of it.
Then there are files and letters and things that you can look at but you cannot record.
Then there's another level of files that they hold which aren't available, which are either personal to the family or for national security reasons can't be let out.
And I was thinking to myself in that Kennedy Library during that operation, there may have been a stealth archive as we come to think now about the time capsule that Nixon kept.
Were these people aware of or looking for something there?
And did they use?
The Boston Marathon bombing as the ultimate cover to basically distract the staff by blowing out half of it and then going for these files.
It's hard to say, but something strange was going on there for those things to take place at exactly the same period of time.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Show.
This is X Series 88.
We're going deep down to the stealth archives of the JFK Records Act, JFK's assassination, and the connection between Nixon and Trump.
And of course, the controller of the Oswald.
Operation George Joannidis, who, according to the CIA, didn't exist until he was accidentally found by a reporter, the Washington Post, who was soon fired for putting that information across and bringing it up, or at least he couldn't go any further with it there at the Post and he moved into his new work.
And Jefferson Morley's done some very interesting work on the CIA.
He has an incredible book about.
James Jesus Angleton, really, who was really deeply behind the operations of the Kennedy assassination, but had that 30 year career.
He's much less known in a sense than Dulles was.
Yes, what do you got?
Danielle Jorgensen says Is it time to revisit the mysterious notes that puppies send off?
There might be something there.
Yes, yeah.
That was very interesting, and I think everyone got a feel on that.
I remember Catherine Fitz had a good theory.
She said that the Clintons were so upset during that because the word was that Bush was going to make a deal with Trump.
And that's how they got William Barr, who, after all, is a Bush crony.
But he has acted more like an attorney general than Sessions did, interestingly enough.
So it is quite interesting.
And I agree, there was something very, very unusual at that funeral.
A quick flash on all this.
And here's what I think may have been in the library that they were looking for.
This is very, I mean, this is a very involved subject, but it has to do with tapes that Jackie Kennedy made.
Now, yes, it's well known that in early 1964, with Kennedy family historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jackie Kennedy sat down and she made a series of recordings about all of her impressions.
After the assassination of their time there together and all the rest, and that those tapes were not to be released until after the death of both of her children or 50 years after her own death, something to that effect.
So, oddly enough, there was a rumor that the tapes were going to be released early and that this had come about as something that Carolyn wanted to do.
In the tapes, someone who was transcribing them leaked to a major newspaper in the UK, the Daily Mail, that Jackie felt that the force behind the assassination was LBJ.
Now, it's interesting because, of course, we're going to be interviewing Roger Stone, who is the four decades long Trump advisor and someone who has been a presidential advisor since Nixon with Reagan.
Uh, just has a really colorful career, uh, in politics, and he is coming on the program Monday at three o'clock.
Actually, he was gonna do it today, but he had a throat issue.
And, uh, interestingly enough, he had a book called LBJ The Man Who Killed Kennedy, which harkens back to a 2003 documentary that was banned by the History Channel called The Men Who Killed Kennedy The Guilty Men, which was all about these incredible and I mean, incredible revelations about LBJ and, uh, His business dealings and how he was headed for prison at that point, and Kennedy was getting him off the ticket,
and that he worked with CIA elements in order to eliminate JFK.
Absolutely plausible.
There's great evidence for it.
Fingerprinting President Run00:13:04
And in fact, there was a fingerprint found in the school book depository that they identified.
It took many years to do it because the person who had been arrested, who was an LBJ hitman named Mac Wallace, he had been arrested for shooting a Golf Pro in the early 50s.
And that card.
Of his fingerprint didn't become available to the public.
They had to wait some 40 years for that thing to come out.
And when it did, the couple of researchers were ready, grabbed it, got a fingerprint expert.
They compared it and said it was Mac Wallace's fingerprint.
And the guy who did the fingerprint analysis had over four decades of experience.
He was just a complete crackerjack.
So there's no doubt about it that Mac Wallace was there on the sixth floor.
And he was probably pretending to be Oswald and creating some kind of ruckus on the sixth floor, firing a shot and taking off.
So, they could pull this whole thing together.
Now, it is a fascinating thing, and it was banned, and Nigel Turner had to go kind of underground in the UK.
He really hasn't been seen since.
I mean, I'm sure he's alive and well, but he has not been in public.
That's for damn sure.
And he did some remarkable work around this.
And I highly recommend it.
It can still be found, the guilty men.
But this is interesting because Jackie had said on those tapes, apparently, that she felt that it was LBJ who was behind it.
Interestingly enough, when the Russians, this is something that came out in 2017 with this records push.
That the Russians themselves, after their full analysis in the 60s, decided it was LBJ who had pulled it off.
And that's one of the headlines from that, which is Soviets thought President Lyndon B. Johnson was behind the Kennedy assassination.
Now, there was a book called Farewell America that a publishing house in New York City that Jackie Kennedy ran put out.
And it was all these French intelligence officials saying that the assassination had been caused by LBJ.
And they tracked back.
All of those links, I mean, in association with the Central Intelligence Agency.
He was the man waiting in the wings.
It's very interesting how LBJ is portrayed there as that freedom fighter and all these things that came through with him.
And we've gone pretty deep on LBJ on this program before.
One of the things about him quitting the presidential race in 1968 is quite fascinating when you think about it because he broke precedent.
There's no president there that didn't run for re election unless he was sick or dead.
Because that's what you do when you're president.
For him not to run, it's very telling.
And it was because Robert Kennedy had got into the race and he knew that they were going to take Robert Kennedy out because there was no way that he was going to be able to get to the White House.
And he realized if I'm in office and two presidents who are both named Kennedy, or two candidates, one candidate for president and one a president that I succeed, if they're both killed while I'm in office, this is not.
Going to look good.
It's going to track back to me and I'm out of here.
So he signed off on this.
And a few days after he gets out of the race, MLK is assassinated.
MLK was going to back RFK.
And then two months after that, RFK is dead after winning the California primary and being the odds on favorite to win the presidency in 1968.
With a bunch of CIA agents right there in the audience.
Yes.
Well, there's been a big CIA presence tracking.
And I think the words of RFK Jr. talking about this and talking about Thane Eugene Caesar and all the rest of it are very compelling.
There's a book by John Meyer called Age of Secrets, which I always recommend.
And Meyer, unfortunately, was chased throughout the world for his information, but he was Howard Hughes' bookkeeper.
And I've spoken to his son and I've had communication there.
But in the book, he's very clear in his diary that he hears directly that Robert Mayhew had the assassination of Robert Kennedy set up.
And that so, Thane Eugene Caesar being an employee of Lockheed Martin and being there with a gun, and the coroner, Thomas Noguchi, is one of the greatest in the country, saying that it wasn't Sir Hans' gun that killed Kennedy because he was in front of him and three or four.
Feet in the distance, and that the shot had to come directly behind him.
So, when we see that information kind of roll out, we realize that in the country, it's like we need a conversation about the things that have taken place and the immense power that the CIA has over the media.
I mean, they're even playing a major role in this operation because there was a story they were trying to float for a little while that the CIA had tried to warn Trump about this pandemic before it hit, but he didn't take it, you know, and so bad Trump.
So, the CIA has been there at every stop.
During the impeachment trial, it was a CIA guy who overheard this thing about the Ukraine, Trump supposedly asking for help against Joe Biden from the Ukraine.
That's CIA again.
And then the CIA people with the Steele dossier and John Brennan, the former CIA director, who, by the way, was like, we really need to get more information on that UFO file.
And by the way, Luis Elizondo from TTSA worked for John Brennan, who was Obama's head of CIA and nicknamed the Drone King because he liked to go around droning.
Parties and wedding parties and things like that in Afghanistan, and really creating for the United States a real problem with our reputation over there because there are better ways to get terrorists than to wipe out civilians.
And the way that a lot of these CIA directors look at it, it's collateral damage.
We're looking for some guy.
If we kill 50 people while we're doing it, it's okay.
It's a sick mentality.
It really is.
But this is what we see over and over again.
Inside the Central Intelligence Agency.
So I think when we get into these things, it's good for us to deconstruct and check in where we are.
But the way that we look at events that set this state up the way that it is, you know, it gives us a hint of where things are going and how to unravel that.
Because when we can bring it forward and when we have that consciousness about what has actually happened, it changes the paradigm dramatically.
So the media.
You know, ba bling, ba bling, they play it on heavy duty trying to get us to believe the old stories.
And we've broken out of so many of them, really.
I mean, it's funny because even the story of the Kennedy assassination, seven out of 10 people don't believe the ridiculous historical story, but that's history, right?
So it's wrong history.
So in these different countries, as I've mentioned, they've had reconciliation committees.
We're coming to a point where these things are going to need to collapse.
The story around the UFO file needs to collapse.
It's a false story.
It's been repressed by the CIA.
Now they want to make up a phony threat story.
That has to be rejected thoroughly.
The Kennedy assassinations, the MLK assassination, these incredible plane crash assassinations, the things that the CIA has done to maintain power inside this country, they don't have power to operate domestically.
Remember, they have no policing powers.
They're a completely illegal outgrowth of World War II.
So, just like I was saying, with the governors not having the ability to make laws that legislatures can, We have to stop these agencies and governors and bureaucrats from creating false realities and false powers.
And we need to go back and look and say the Constitution gives you this ability, and that needs to be the conversation.
One of the really terrible things, and I even hate to mention it, is all the police brutality that we've seen with the lockdown.
And when you look at some of the beatdowns that we've seen in places like New York City with people just standing around and the cops being bored and beating the crap out of them.
I mean, that looks like North Korea.
So, they've created this, you know, these petty tyrants of the governors have created this situation.
And the police are acting it out, but the police can't always be relied upon to live up to their best.
And, you know, they are breaking laws and they're attacking citizens.
So, when we look at that and we look at that kind of lawlessness, we see the future that they're breeding here.
And this is where we need the open conversation, which is, Stop with all the BS stuff about mass and all that juvenile stuff.
What are you doing, setting police and riot gear out to people who are protesting because you've destroyed their lives and their small business?
It needs to be a conversation.
And if the leadership is smart, that's what they'll do because I have a feeling that there's a turn inside the population in the United States and that the people, just like the Salon case, the overreach is starting to be identified as the fear.
There's only so much fear the system can take.
There's a certain point at which it becomes numb, and the media is hitting that wall.
You can see them kind of doing more wild stories around this, like, hey, your blood is going to clot, and they'll use anything now.
The next thing they'll say is, oh, you can't actually have sex.
You have to just do it using a test tube, and Bill Gates will give you a special test tube.
Just wait 18 months, everything will be fine.
We're looking at situations like that, and we need to take charge more from a mental point of view.
Part of it is.
Really taking in the information that people have sacrificed to get to us.
And a lot of that information has come to us from whistleblowers.
And we have it.
The Kennedy case is a perfect case.
There's no reason for the CIA to hold on to those records.
They're legally mandated to go to the public last October 26, 2017.
It's funny because weird things started to happen after that.
You know, the Q stuff showed up on these boards, and the TTSA came out with their.
Psyop.
So I think that we need to take something like the JFK records and really it's somewhere where changing that story,
changing that history back to what actually happened and making the CIA accountable and also putting in place rules for the Central Intelligence Agency not to have domestic policing abilities and really exposing that agency for what they've done has to become a crucial part of this because too many things are hidden now and the Central Intelligence Agency.
Along with the media, has created this non transparent situation.
So it's schizophrenic on the ground.
And all we do are hear, you know, there's a biblical quote about hearing about wars and rumors of wars.
You know, we're hearing about all these different things and it's not adding up.
So I think it is a crucial stage that we get into when we're looking at this.
And with that, Miss Olivia, I am going to turn it over to you and your questions.
Okay.
So, Todd Roderick, so do you think we'll ever know the truth about the JFK assassination?
Yeah, well, we know that the CIA assassinated Kennedy.
And we even know, like with Joe and Nitty, some of the personnel that were used.
So, you know, will the establishment ever admit it?
You know, there comes a certain point where people just know it and they should stand up for what they know and they should force the governments to give them the information.
The way that I look at it, you know, I can't think for a moment that I would go to the government for UFO disclosure, for example.
But the idea that in popular parlance, you know, in the media and things that people, you know, it's like we need some fundamental understanding about these things.
And I think what happens is the people who are moving in on that reality, they are going to, you know, take on the understanding of things about the UFO file.
Pluto Psychic Dixon Predictions00:05:10
They will understand that the deep state exists and has done these things, and that that older order is going to use whatever it can to maintain the power that it has.
This is the great clash that we're in.
And I don't think that that system can be compelled to basically give in to reality.
But I think at a certain point, they can collapse under the weight of their own lies.
And that's where popular perception changes.
So it is about moving the culture.
It depends on the when of your question.
Astrologically speaking, Pluto is very powerful right now.
Yes.
And Pluto is about hidden things.
And there is, we are in a time where hidden things can come to light.
That's fascinating.
I've always thought that the elites use astrology.
And if you listen to any astrologer, they all have, you know, millionaires and billionaires who consult with them.
And so it makes sense that they would know that this time is coming for exposure and to get ahead of it.
To get in front of it.
Well, let's not forget that we started the year off with a show about Gene Dixon, who was a psychic for five different presidents, and she used a lot of astrology.
It's funny you mentioned Pluto, though, because Pluto comes up in the Casey readings.
Remember, Pluto's only been discovered in 1930, didn't even know it was there before.
And when Casey mentions it, he talks about how it's getting closer to Earth.
And one of the things, the qualities that it had, he said it would lift the veil between.
Life and life after death, that people would understand that aspect of it more, which I always found fascinating.
And then, strangely enough, this movement over the last 10 years to demote it as a planet completely is that to get people not to even pay attention to what it means?
It makes you wonder why they would demote it.
And also, astrologers don't go along with that.
Exactly.
They know how powerful Pluto is.
I mean, I don't care what you call it.
I know personally with my own life.
Not to mention Chiron.
Exactly.
I think Pluto is more powerful.
So, Poppy Snow, have there been any attempts on Trump?
You were kind of alluding to this.
I will say, I was just listening.
I've been spending the last two weeks getting caught up on new astrologers I've never heard of, but seem pretty good on YouTube.
And this is a time where we can see between now and maybe early next year the removal of a president.
So, whether it would be Trump or if Trump gets reelected, it's really strange.
Actually, There's this woman, I think they call her the Belgian psychic, and she died in the 90s, but she had a very interesting batting average.
And she predicted odd things for 2020, and we included it in our Armageddon 2020 episode with Gene Dixon.
And there were odd things because one of the things that Robert Merritt said, who had been around Nixon, and this whole time capsule story came from him working as a secret agent for Nixon, he said that Nixon said that 2020.
Would be a calamitous year for the United States and the world.
It's very odd.
Jean Dixon, in her book in 1971, predicted this.
This is where I think Nixon.
And got it.
And so when we look at that, then this Belgian psychic said, you know, actually, the Russian president is going to have a condition like being poisoned.
And although he won't die, he'll be kind of out of effect.
That was one prediction that she made.
And then I think someone has it right the blind grandma.
And then the other prediction that she made was that.
It was something about the president in 2020 wouldn't be the president and that there wouldn't be an election.
It was very odd and it was a little bit nebulous.
It was a little bit more clear what she was saying about the Russian president.
But I think so many of these people pointing out 2020 is odd because 2020 turned out to be the real hardcore year so far, right?
This is four months in.
We just can't see what else is coming.
There's all this kind of incredible astronomical activity we've been tracking as well.
So, but everybody had pointed to 2012 and been like, hey, 2012, you know, so I remember 2012 was pretty mild.
And so it's funny when you look at these things, it's like 2020 was way, way more.
I mean, if they were looking to predict that, they're by eight years off.
All right.
So, everyone, you're watching Dark Journalist.
This is now X Series 88.
And I want to remind you to go to darkjournalist.com, sign up for the newsletter.
It's free.
And that keeps us in touch with each other.
We're going to take.
More questions from Miss Olivia.
War Machine Fear Tactics00:09:45
Leah Gogg says, Murder Hornets, too.
Oh, God, I don't even want to.
That's the first time I've said that.
I couldn't believe that the media, who's fed us this incredibly, you know, over the top propaganda, alarm bells, you know, emergency this, emergency that, that they love this Murder Hornets thing, that they just instantly jumped on that.
And I think their thing now is they just are kind of like pulling the fear from people.
They'll do anything to do it.
And, but yeah, there you go.
Murder hornets really make it happen.
Okay, Marco Zirba, I've heard this before, but I'm going to ask it again in this context.
Did they murder RFK Jr.'s granddaughter and great grandson to send him a message?
I originally did not think so, and I feel a little uneasy asking the question, but in light of everything going on, what do you think?
Well, I mean, the.
The Kennedys are in the firing line.
And I think RFK Jr.'s work, we're seeing also in independent circles, there are these forces attacking RFK Jr.
And when you see that, really push it off because he's done incredible things for trying to bring transparency around the environment, vaccines, and the assassinations and everything.
I think that that is how that world works.
You know, they do try to do things and.
Really silence you as we've seen.
The Kennedys have very much experienced that.
I have the truth is, I have no idea what took place there and with the Kennedy family and that drowning accident, as they called it.
It's very suspicious timing.
I mean, it just is.
And when you look at how the media is going after now Mikovitz, the same way they were going after Kennedy, you can really see it as a program.
It's like they have to take them down because they're worried.
That they'll lose this platform.
And the platform that they were looking for was to remove the religious exemption or any medical exemptions for vaccines.
For some reason, they wanted everybody.
And I believe it has to do with nanotechnology and the ability to track.
They need everybody in that grid.
And that's where we need to get Alana Freeland back in the program to talk about the planetary control grid and the space fence.
But the incredible geoengineering stuff that she tracks, that's how it makes sense to me.
That they do because otherwise, putting these people up in a shooting gallery and shooting at them just because they disagree with you, I mean, they really go for the jugular on this, and they're protecting something.
The media are just poodles, they're like wind up poodles, like Rachel Maddow and MSNBC or Chris Cuomo and stuff.
There's nothing left inside of them.
They're literally, you know, they're just programmed, there's no thinking.
They're pretty robotic, actually.
Yeah, oh, yeah, absolutely.
Well, Their companies are run by the war machine.
The companies behind CNN and MSNBC, they're war profiteers.
So they need wars.
That's where they're heading.
They need pharmaceuticals to control every movement in your life, they need the surveillance technology, they need war.
That's what's controlling that.
And I really point them out in particular because they've just been the most egregious liars.
But the media itself is just a wall.
Of noise now.
It's very hard even to get good solid intel about anything because so much of it is politically motivated now.
And the hydroxychloroquine was a fantastic example where they got tremendous results.
And then they had to do these stories where they had ridiculous tests that had nothing to do with testing the product just to say that it didn't work.
Because if they had the solution for COVID being hydroxychloroquine, then you wouldn't need all the Bill Gates.
You know, oligarchy moving in to control every move of your life.
It would defeat the whole purpose.
So, the media, which used to cover things up and was motivated, is just now such a level of not being trusted.
It's like they've achieved a level of malevolence towards humanity.
And I think the biggest reform, bigger than government reform, bigger than military reform, you know, anything that I can think of, social reform, is media reform.
The media has lost the ability to tell the truth.
And if you are in the media and you don't tell the truth, you get out of the business.
Because what good are you?
All right.
I just wanted to correct what we just said.
So the two drowning accident victims were not RFK Jr.'s grandchildren, but his eldest sisters, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend.
Okay.
Yeah.
Did I say that?
No, I did.
That's how I asked the question.
So that's just correcting.
Yeah.
No, no.
That's good.
And it's.
It's a terrible tragedy.
And it's an amazing thing that that family, from the get go, when you go back even into the 40s and you think about Joe Jr. dying in that plane crash and all the different things that happened with them, I mean, it's an extraordinary tale of tragedy that they've had.
And somehow they've persevered and gone through it and still stand for something.
Okay.
And that leads me to my next question.
So, Ted Brenneman wants to know the Kennedys are there to think for themselves.
That seems to get them killed at an abnormally high rate.
What would you say?
I have my own answer for it.
Well, look, in the 1960s, a war took place.
And the kind of PBS white liberal idea of it is we shall overcome, and that we won all this stuff, and we're so great because we got black people the right to vote.
Now, those accomplishments were in the works for a while, and they are great that people could get fair housing and be able to vote.
But the truth is, When those PBS liberal documentaries look back, they should look back and say there were forces that were JFK, RFK, and MLK, which were trying to move the country in a different direction.
And those leaders got killed, systematically picked off, and that the media hid the perpetrators who were inside the government.
And so, because they did that, they turned the society upside down.
And in doing that, by removing the leaders, we got other leaders.
And we got the war machine, which continues to explode.
Remember, $750 billion on the record.
For what?
We're not even at war.
Right?
I mean, I know they want to bomb Iran, but they haven't got around to it yet.
Venezuela just caught a couple of American commandos going in there.
You know, and there are guys like Monk Pompeo in the Trump administration, Secretary of State, should be fired immediately because they are part of the neocon push.
Just like Obama had neocon instincts and bombed Libya, moved into all these different countries, he did more bombing campaigns than George W. Bush.
So we have to remember who we're talking about here.
This is an ongoing war machine.
And to just feed all this money into this war machine, that's not the way to go.
Now they want to take war into space and say space is a war fighting domain.
The conversation has to be why?
Shouldn't you be opening up to these other countries and saying, you know what, I don't want a war in space.
So, space isn't a war fighting domain.
It is, you know, for peaceful exploration and science and knowledge and, you know, for colonization.
And that's where the space program came from.
That's what President Kennedy wanted to do with it.
And when we look back at the vision of Kennedy, he said that the thing that we must not do is make space a war fighting domain.
So, there the Trump administration is completely wrong for doing that.
And the Democrats aren't any better.
So, we've lost that kind of moral compass in the world.
It's just a competition.
And so, it's crucial for people to say, to make peace a centerpiece of this whole future that we want, and to say the wars aren't acceptable, you know, and bombing Iran is not acceptable.
So, when they move into this posture, You know, the Trump administration has the chance to do something great, which is reopen America, create the booming economy, and push back the operation, the op, right?
The lockdown, steal your rights, steal your Constitution up.
They have the ability to do it.
But they have to be careful that those neocon voices don't say, you know what, the thing to do would be go after Iran now, because that will destroy any legacy that the Trump administration has.
And so I hope they're listening.
Yes.
I really want to bring this up.
So, ModWiz said this perfectly.
Labor Compassion Biophobia Split00:11:21
Real humans are not biophobic.
Biophobia exposes the bad seed.
This is something that I've been meditating on for the past few weeks.
When somebody in the ideas room brought up the term biophobia, and I loved it, I looked it up and I said, This is it.
This is biophobia and transhumanism.
And that what we're seeing is we can try to analyze why we're seeing it, but what we're clearly seeing is people who are disgusted by and repulsed by their humanity and want to erase it.
They want to merge with machines.
They don't want to take the long route of, you know, I'll say this.
This is a terrible thing to say, and it's risky putting it out there.
But the Nazis, okay.
Who had a similar eugenic goal in mind?
They were very much nature oriented.
The whole thing was a reaction against the technology that was moving.
And we've seen those, you know, the women dancing in nature, you know, it was very pagan.
Right, right.
So this is really interesting because it's a blend of sort of Nazi goals, but absolutely they are in love with technology.
And they are more than anything, they despise what is human.
And what it and just nature, you know, they just want to eradicate nature.
And it seems to me, um, that what we're experiencing with that's part of the masks, that's part of us not looking at each other, not smiling at each other, not being able to hug friends when you see them, you know, being separated from one another.
It's all part of their little plan, no question.
I totally agree with that, and I couldn't add anything constructive on that, but I do see it too, which is that the, um, See, the technology, I've worked in technology as a tech editor for 10 years.
I understand the technology very well.
And it has such incredible potential.
And we have aspects of doing things that would take so much longer before.
So, the positive aspects of the technology are there.
What they are doing, this group that's come up through the technology, Zuckerberg, terrible leadership, they do not have the ethics to guide.
The development of the culture.
And this is the problem.
It is their ethical failing that we're really looking at.
And that's where you're getting, you know, Jack Dorsey on Twitter stamp down and get rid of anyone who disagrees on this subject.
You know, Zuckerberg put false information like they did on Alexander Bruce from Forbidden Knowledge TV.
I said this to her.
You know, they put up, she put up, Something about the pandemic and how other doctors had said something totally different about what the media was saying.
And they put down a big thing across it that says false information, proven to be false.
This is the weird censorship control grid.
And I have a feeling that these companies have gone over to different countries like China and they've seen that incredible social credit system and the lockdown of people.
And they had one guy in China that he punished for social media crimes and they were shocking.
It was like electric shock.
China.
Has incredible people, but the government is so backward.
And these people are thinking, hey, China knows how to do it because they don't have to give their workers any rights and all this other stuff, and they're technocrats in control.
And it looks to me like Facebook and Twitter and all these people are behind them.
And I think there's a lot of Chinese money behind the Democrats.
Problem is that China, although they've had an incredible economic explosion because they had so much labor and we had so much demand and we moved all our factories there, they don't have the ethical.
Weather vein to guide the world.
And I think this is what we're looking at over and over again: there's an ethics problem.
And, you know, can I correct you?
Yeah.
There's a compassion problem because ethics comes from the compassion is first.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Well, I think they work together.
It seems to me that this is the thing that we're looking at the most.
So, you know, China, when I look at that, the classic example were those Apple factories that they had in China, which were all Chinese labor.
And the people in the factories were working so hard that they.
Jumped out windows and they worked to the bone and they just wanted to get out of that life.
And so those companies didn't look at the labor force and say, oh, let's get them rest and better working conditions or psychologists to help them through different issues.
Instead, they said, let's put nets around the building so then when they jump out the window, they won't kill themselves.
We can grab them back and put them back to work.
This is the way that they think.
And then that's one way of kind of slave driving.
And then the next way they're going to do it is to create machines to do the jobs and to eliminate.
The workforce, so they don't have to deal with things like giving them rights.
You know, it's funny, we spoke about Eric Casey briefly earlier, and he said the real revolution will come in America between capital and labor.
And this is what we're looking at really, which is humanity is labor and capital are those financial centers.
And that battle that was taking place in that era between labor and capital, he was talking about far off in the future.
And this is what I think we're looking at, which is when you talk about that 1% versus everyone else whose wages are stagnant or now their small businesses are destroyed.
These are fundamental concepts.
And for the leadership not to get it, you know, just shows what a poor leadership that we have at this period in history.
It's going to take it from people from the ground up, kind of from the bootstraps up, rather than from the top down.
This is the way it works.
That's why people like Fitz talk about doing it local or local farming or all the rest.
All right, one more question.
Well, I'm just going to.
Pop in.
I'm thinking about, I keep thinking about Gretchen Whitmer and how, you know.
Don't think about her too much.
Well, I don't know how I would have thought about her when I was younger, but to me, it's so, she sort of is the face of irresponsible power, of someone who does not have, as far as I can see, any compassion.
She looks like she is a psychopath.
She really is.
And completely, and it's horrible as a woman, right?
You want to see women in power.
For me, as a woman, I want to see women in power who deserve that power, responsible for that power, and are honorable.
And it's just shameful.
She's worse than so many men.
It's true.
We have a derby every week who's the worst governor in the United States?
And Gavin Newsom was up there for a while, but Gretchen, she got it.
Now, Charlie Baker with his face mask thing, he's up there now, too.
He was losing it at a recent press conference, so they're asking him tough questions.
He's a better phony.
I'd say he's a better friend, but I think I don't know that there's.
I would hope that, um, as my consciousness is um increasing from being at home, that other people are too, and that I might I can just hear lies now, I can see it, I can sense it in my body, I can just spot the the spin and the propaganda of the media and the politicians.
And I think to myself, none of them are responsible enough to hold office.
Where are the responsible people that I could trust that kind of power?
It really doesn't seem to exist.
Here's an interesting thing, too, when you look at The, I mean, there's no reason, literally no reason, for these states not to be open.
And it's going to be that the states that are open will be doing so well because people will be getting themselves back to work and the whole mood of those states will change.
And they'll have these other idiots in these kind of like liberal dead zones, like Massachusetts and New York and all this other stuff, who are way behind the curve because they're looking to do this kind of weird, crooked thing with Bill Gates in the back door and partners in health with Clinton and all this.
They're like, well, create contact tracer armies.
In the meantime, these other states are going to be opening up and becoming the envy of the other states.
So, this is the weird split that we're seeing.
And it's something I think we have to keep a close eye on.
The weird thing about Whitmer, too, is that she's had the protests.
Her own legislature has voted against her emergency powers rule.
So, and at this point, she's like, I don't care.
I'm going to do the right thing anyway.
It's just because she's been promised something.
Somebody's told her this is the right thing to do because otherwise, unless she's just a complete idiot.
And she just wants to hold on to those powers.
A lot of those people do.
Cormos like that too, which they can't imagine giving up the emergency powers.
And this is part of the problem of this it's exposed a lot of petty tyrants.
And the governors are, a lot of them are petty tyrants.
They've shown it, which is remarkable because they have a great opportunity to lead.
But I think this is what we're seeing there.
And it's an incredible gap in leadership that we're witnessing.
And I've seen it with some mayors too.
But then you do have some governors, and I have to say, the governor in Georgia, you know, he didn't hold back.
And the only thing that I request of these governors is open your state.
I don't care about your position on anything else.
Open your damn state up, you know, and you've got all the resources and all the money, you know, so go for it and support your small businesses because right now you're making things incredibly hard for people.
Okay.
We'll take one more question and then I'm going to read this Janetti's thing to round out our evening.
Well, then, Janet Mondry has a.
I think you know about this.
Yes.
Here's a question we should be asking Who the hell are these people?
I just learned the New York City mayor's real name is Warren Wilhelm Jr. Wilhelm.
Yeah.
Yes.
His parents were in the Communist Party.
Yeah, de Blasio.
De Blasio, his real name is Warren Wilhelm.
And it is odd.
It is odd.
I think.
Also, de Blasio is, you know, he's the closest thing to a socialist mayor that we have.
And that's not a disqualifier on its own, but the way that he's run this lockdown has been absurd.
And putting those patrols out, the distancing patrols, and these guys going into these neighborhoods where people are having a rough time because you just collapse their businesses and you're throwing them up against walls and, you know, kneeling on their back on the ground, all their faces.
Uphold the Protocol00:03:54
I mean, how do you.
Think that looks as a leader, you know, you know how many people, millions of people, see those videos.
How do you think that makes Warren Wilhelm look?
You know, so you have to think of it this way, which is, it seems like they're not thinking straight, you know.
And then the cop that did that really egregiously grabbed this guy and beat him up.
I mean, he just literally beat him up for no reason with no resistance.
You know, they said, oh, he's temporarily suspended as we look into it.
You know, You should probably say that his actions were despicable, and I hope that we can get him off the force.
You know, that's the way you would do it.
So, you know, the police are like the military.
There's a protocol, and they have to uphold the protocol.
That's the whole point.
That's what makes the military great or the police great.
And when the people don't uphold the protocol, they bring disgrace to the force.
So, you know, this is the nature of what we're talking about.
So it is shocking.
This is more of the ethics problem I think we see going on.
Yes.
Last question.
Okay.
Oh, well, I wasn't ready for it.
Well, I'll ask this.
Ed Kaufman says, This is Thane Eugene Caesar, worked for Lockheed.
Did the aerospace industry want RFK dead and why?
This seems to tie it all together.
Well, there's no question.
Can you connect these dots for us?
Well, look at it.
First of all, Lockheed Martin is a military contractor, and Garrison.
Who did the best investigation of the JFK assassination?
He said that he found that the conspiracy wasn't so much Texas oil men and these types of things, but that the heart of it was in the military industrial complex aerospace wing.
That whatever resided in there, and this relates to the X technology, that was the mechanism for financing and planning the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
When Robert Kennedy comes up, it is the It's JFK version two, and they have to eliminate him before he gets in.
Because remember, taking out the president was hard enough because you had to corrupt elements of the Secret Service and all the rest of it.
When Kennedy was still a senator, it was easier to do.
They had to prevent him from getting across the finish line where he was headed.
But there's no question there are aspects in relation to the moon program at that point.
You know, it's getting very strange and it's becoming a very black ops dead zone.
Because they're going to the moon, yes.
But right after a couple of moonshots in 1972, they have 50 years of not going to the moon.
And then we have Mike Pence and all that talking about at the end of last year with the Space Force we're going back to the moon in 2024 and all that.
Why'd you wait 50 years?
So, whatever they needed for things to go black as they developed a secret space program, a Kennedy wouldn't have been on board with that because they're about freedom and moving the culture forward.
And they knew that, especially in terms of Robert Kennedy, he was also going to get to the bottom of his brother's death, which I'm sure he already knew.
So they couldn't let the enemy back in.
And I think that the Bob Dylan song, actually, that he came out with, that we talked about at the beginning of the program, spells that out pretty well.
I listened to those lyrics real close.
I'm going to end with this because we started with Janities and Jefferson Morley.
And this is just kind of Morley's take.
Judges Ruled Nitty File00:04:11
On Janinis.
This is one of the last pictures of Janinis, who was always good at hiding out and hanging out.
Jefferson Morley.
Last week, the CIA admitted that it destroyed key evidence in the case of Al Qaeda leader Abu Zubadiyah, triggering denunciations from congressional leaders and legal authorities who said the agency was behaving lawlessly.
Two days later, a three-dodge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals ordered the agency to search for long-suppressed files.
Related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963.
The judges said the CIA had to search the files of a deceased Miami based intelligence officer who hid what he knew about accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald from investigators.
This is Chuinides.
The appellate court ruling marked an unusual setback for the agency.
FOIA decisions against the CIA are relatively rare.
This was the gist of Judge Judith Rogers' 31 page decision in my Freedom of Information Act FOIA lawsuit seeking records of George Chuinides.
A career undercover officer at the time of Kennedy's murder, Joe Anniddy served as chief of psychological warfare operations in South Florida.
He also served as the CIA's liaison to congressional JFK investigators in 1978, and he died in 1990 before the Assassination Record Review Board.
Rogers, joined by two colleagues, rejected the CIA's argument that it had no obligation to search for documents about Joe Anniddy's in its files of its secret operations in 1963.
During oral arguments in October, the judges had grilled agency lawyers about this claim.
In the decision, the judges ruled that the law required a search of sensitive operational files, something the agencies always resist.
The judges also said that the agency had not adequately explained the whereabouts of monthly reports filed by Joe Annides in 1963.
In August 1963, Joe Annides was secretly funding a Cuban exile group whose members clashed repeatedly with Oswald in public.
An ex Marine, Oswald, was a supporter of Cuban communist leader Fidel Castro, which we know is actually not true.
When Kennedy was killed in Dallas, apparently by Oswald, three months later, the group used CIA funds to publicize these contacts and blame the assassination on Castro, which was the plan all along, apparently.
The CIA did not reveal Joe Nitti's financial relationship to the accused assassin's antagonists to the Warren Commission, which investigated the crime and concluded that Oswald acted alone.
Joe Annitti's reports on his action in 1963 have never surfaced.
Quote On remand, the CIA must supplement its explanation of why the reports cannot be found, the court ruled.
The judges ordered lower court Judge Richard Leon to supervise the implementation of its order, a process that is expected to take several months.
The CIA has constantly been an active leader in hiding, distorting, and sometimes destroying evidence in key issues affecting our history and lives.
That gives us some idea there on the case.
And what's interesting is after that, they blocked the Joe and Nitty's file.
So the Joe and Nitty's file is a crucial part of the JFK records, even though the Congressional Records Act mandates the CIA files based on what they knew that the CIA had held back.
These other files are also crucial to come out in order for us to understand the role of psychological warfare experts in creating.
The myth of Lee Harvey Oswald as the assassin of John F. Kennedy.
That is the kind of change and reconciliation and paradigm change that we need in relation to this.
There's more on Trump and Nixon, but don't worry.
What I didn't get to tonight, Monday at 3 o'clock with Roger Stone, we're going to be here.
Executive Order Property Seizure00:02:46
And if you signed up for the newsletter, then you're going to get the direct link for that.
We will see you all on Monday at 3 o'clock.
I also want to recommend that you sign up for the newsletter.
Go to darkjournalist.com right now.
And make sure you do that.
And also subscribe to Dark Journalists, get behind the program, the efforts, the work that we're doing here.
And we really appreciate all your support.
And we try to make it easy for everyone to join.
So we've kept it very reasonable.
And you could do that at darkjournalist.com.
I've got a really juicy question I want to ask Sarah Bella Zhignak.
Trump's first executive order was to seize all property where high crimes against humanity and corruption were involved.
Is Elon Musk selling all his properties have anything to do with that executive order?
This is very interesting because the other night, Elon Musk was rolling out these tweets and they were strange.
He was like, I'm selling all my possessions.
But part of it was that he was saying we have to end the lockdown and things like that, which I agreed with.
And he has, the things that he said in relation to lockdown have been correct.
So there's a very interesting game, I think, going on with Musk in relation to this.
But.
I think it was an interesting order that Trump made about seizing property of these corrupt groups.
And I don't know if those things are related, but they sure are interesting.
Remember the ex steganography, people like Bezos, Musk, they're right in the heart of it.
And the technology, the space technology aspect, is crucial because eventually it's the satellites, after all, that are going to control things on the ground.
So space and lower Earth orbit become.
Really, the next battlefield in this sense.
That's how they've made it.
They've made it into war fighting domain.
The way to pull the plug on that is by emphasizing and getting back to the roots of what the space program is about and having them forcing legislatures to not allow war in space and get all those nations, if you want to make the United Nations worth something, have them develop a resolution not to go into space and have any war and make all the countries sign on to it.
You know, this is the nature of the thing that can make going into the 2020s something really worthwhile and something to look forward to.
We can definitely learn a lot from the lockdown and the overreach involved, even as it gets uglier here in 2020.
There's a lot of things I think we can learn from it.
Thank You Great See Momentum00:05:29
In terms of the JFK Records Act and how this relates, you know, it is a cold case and it is from our past, but there was such a change, such a paradigm change.
That, in terms of setting a new course, one of the fundamental things I think that we can correct is the false information and the psychological warfare that the CIA laid down on the American people in the world through the figure of George Joannidis, who we've only just recently found out about.
And we do need those records, and the CIA owes those records to the American people per Congressional JFK Records Act, where they were ordered to give them on October 26, 2017, by law.
And that Trump chickened out on that one, unfortunately.
But I think that he has the opportunity to force those records out without waiting for three years.
And I'm sure when they get to three years, they would say, oh, we have to wait another 10 years till we're all dead.
So the way that I look at this is we're in kind of an interesting zone.
And this is really a place, a kind of a crossroads where things can go better for humanity by awakening to this, or they can go worse by coming more under the subjugation of these powers.
And we're lined up here in the middle of the show trying to make things go in the right direction.
And there's so many powerful forces that are moving for that, that you can feel that incredible momentum.
So that's what we're looking for.
And the way that we do it is just by going for the truth and also expanding our mind to embrace these larger truths.
So that's what we're going to try to do on this program.
And thank you so much for joining us tonight.
It was important for us to kind of refocus on the JFK, Nixon, Trump aspects before we get Mr. Stone in here on Monday.
And uh, Miss Olivia, last words, okay.
So, I have to thank some super chats.
Yes, so Eurythmia is fun, Jody Z, Neurosurgery Highland, Kim Woodrum, Scab Tree Scabby, Medley Childress, Splendor Solace, Josh Randall, A Cult Fan, Irie A, Pugsley, Brian Bradley, Joseph Fabry, Wayne Peake, GDNPB, and Carrie Perillo.
It's probably Perillo.
Thank you so much.
Fantastic, we really appreciate your support.
It makes all the difference.
And it is the kind of thing where showing that kind of support gives us that extra momentum to go further along with the work that we're doing.
And thank you to all our supporters and subscribers.
You make the biggest difference.
Now, we will see you all on Monday at 3 p.m.
And then next Friday, we're also coming back with X Series Episode 89.
I'll do a couple of shout outs here at the end.
David Donaway, unbelievable.
It's great to see you.
A cult fan, of course.
Firestorm, Josh Randall, making it happen.
Shelly Cobra, Aether, great to see you.
Najat, terrific, terrific to have you here.
The ideas room was fantastic tonight.
The questions completely off the charts.
Carrie, it's great to see you out there.
And Modwiz, the man, the myth.
I can't wait.
I'd love to see Modwiz do something on this whole pandemic.
You got to do it.
Thomas Tyson, great to see you.
Kessler, Renee DeBlanc, Firestorm.
Adrian McDonald, Jennifer Memon.
I know Kate was out there earlier.
Gigi Young, Carly from Dimensions and Beyond.
Wow.
Fantastic to have everyone out there.
It's great.
Go ahead.
The movie that we were trying to remember is The Lives of Others.
The Lives of Others.
If you haven't seen it, it's an incredible, haunting movie.
And I think that now that we're moving in this direction of surveillance, constant surveillance, it's even more important.
Yeah, we have to know what that is.
People have lived under that before.
It's nothing new.
But end on a good note, though.
Oh, and well, no, I already had that planned.
So let's all focus on solutions because we can't trust people in power to do it for us.
We have to do it for ourselves from the ground up.
So, you know, when you're meditating, when you're walking, just instead of complaining, like keep thinking about what we can do, what is going to make a difference.
How we can work together because we all do outnumber them and we all want the same thing.
We have a shared vision for humanity and we can work together to change this.
No question about the small group of people?
Yes.
It's the only thing that ever has changed.
There's no question.
There's no question.
I think that's an American Revolution one.
Wow, fantastic and terrific to see everyone tonight.
We had a great crowd in the ideas room and we.
Appreciate your questions and your support.
We will see you all next week.
And it says end broadcast, but you know, it never really ends, does it?