Dark Journalist and Alexandra Bruce dissect the 50th anniversary of RFK's assassination, asserting a "deep state" conspiracy involving MKUltra mind control that allegedly manipulated Sirhan Sirhan. They detail suppressed evidence, including Lockheed employee Stane Eugene Caesar's involvement and LAPD cover-ups, while claiming LBJ withdrew from the 1968 race to avoid implication. The hosts expand this narrative to include Obama as a CIA operative, the "Bush Clinton axis," and future threats like 5G eugenics, arguing that eliminating political threats requires massive legal operations and media manipulation to maintain globalist control. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
RFK Assassination Fifty Years Later00:06:46
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalist.
It's great to have everyone here for our Friday night live show.
And, you know, it's kind of fascinating as we're going to be covering the RFK assassination 50 years later as new things are emerging.
And actually, there's some incredible things rising to the surface about this case.
Now, we've been doing the X series on every Friday night, but tonight's show is going to go right in with the RFK assassination details study.
And we're going to bring the X series back.
With part 13 next Friday for everyone.
It's great to see everyone out here.
And of course, I mean, I want to say this in relation to RFK.
He has a big role in the X series.
But this particular episode is going to get more into the layers of the assassination and the ramifications behind it for the 50th anniversary, which will be June 5th, when he had just won the California primary.
And it's a stunning turn of events for a number of reasons, but we're going to get deep.
Into why that act was undertaken by the deep state in such desperation to remove him as the candidate and really expose their hand once again in a short decade of the 60s, where they had only five years ago assassinated President Kennedy.
So we already have a great full house.
And of course, the lovely Olivia is here with us.
Hi, everybody.
And with questions, we're going to do, we have Alexandra Bruce joining us from Forbidden Knowledge TV.
Of course, Alexandra, deep on the deep politics side as you can get.
And she's going to join us in about an hour, and then we're going to take questions after that.
So ask all your questions.
You can ask them now or anytime during this whole conversation that we're going to have.
But do ask them all in caps because that's going to help Olivia spot them out as we go.
And another thing I want to mention right up front is that if you are watching the show and watching the series, definitely go to darkjournalist.com, sign up.
For the newsletter, keep in touch.
That way we can keep in touch with each other, barring any kind of social media unplugging or social media blackout, as I'm sure they're already underway.
One of the things I want to make clear in getting into tonight is that it's so timely because one of the things that has just happened is that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is asking for a new investigation based on things that are evolving into his father's assassination.
In 1968, of course, we had a complete rigmarole, which was kind of like an Oswald replay with Sirhan, Sirhan, and we're going to get deep into him too.
And there's going to be some ex ties to Sirhan, Sirhan that I think are going to really fascinate everyone, including the Rosicrucians and the Theosophists.
So we can see that as we go into these different subjects, we keep coming around to the same kind of mystery school.
And we need to figure out exactly why those links keep showing up again and again.
We're going to be dealing with aerospace companies in this.
We're going to be dealing with military contractors.
Well, how do they get in there?
Well, this is the very interesting thing about the Kennedy assassination.
The RFK assassination has these different layers to it because when you're a senator, there are certain things required by the deep state to remove you.
That is, they're going to be able to hire assassins and have a cover story in place.
When you're a president, as his brother was, JFK, he was a sitting president, and there was a lot more involved.
You needed a lot more of that government apparatus involved and on your side to undertake such an operation.
With RFK and with MLK, who were social leaders, religious leaders, political leaders, these were decisions that were undertaken by the deep state in concert.
And a lot of it goes back to what happened to RFK's brother.
And we're going to get into that because, of course, Johnson was the president during both assassinations and he had suddenly withdrawn.
From the presidential race, which was an unprecedented move.
Of course, Nixon would resign the presidency six years later.
Well, in a way, LBJ is resigning the presidency by doing the unprecedented thing, which is not running when you have the chance to run as a sitting president.
That just doesn't happen.
And now we're going to find out why or take a real good look at why that went down in the first few months of 1968 and why that is crucial to right now with what RFK Jr. is doing, asking for a new investigation.
So let's take a quick look at this.
This is a Washington Post article, and this is kind of fascinating because, as we can see, they're touting this headline, which is that Robert Kennedy Jr. doesn't believe that Sirhan Sirhan was the killer of his father.
Now, what's interesting about this to me is it's the Washington Post, which we know is completely CIA wrong, and you'd think they'd be getting rid of this headline as fast as they could, but they're learning something, which is that in order to co opt stories, they need to get on board.
With them, very much like they're doing with the UFO story.
And this is the new technique by the Central Intelligence Agency and its media arms, which is they are trying to adopt and co opt narratives from a field of study which is outside of their control.
And they have for many years, but they've used the technique of shutting things down, which was easier to do at a certain point.
But now, with this kind of ubiquitous internet, ubiquitous YouTube, Ubiquitous blog, Snapchat, whatever it is, they've decided it's not going to work.
It won't go away.
What we can do, though, is insert our own spin as we go.
So we'll adopt it, we'll take it in, and we'll spin it out our own way.
So one of the things that we saw on this was James Woolsey, who was the former CIA chief, coming forward and saying, well, maybe there was a second shooter in the Kennedy assassination, but it was a KGB agent, not a CIA agent.
So this is how they're going to try to adopt it in case this thing and these stories get out of control.
RFK's assassination is significant for a number of reasons, one of which is that he was destined to be president right there in 1968.
James Woolsey KGB Agent Theory00:14:50
He had gotten to the race quite late, actually, because he was under the assumption that LBJ was going to run.
And he understood that in the game of politics, he would have looked like a spoiler running against a sitting president.
But the anti war effort was moving in such a fashion.
Against Johnson and his incredibly aggressive policies in Vietnam, that they had elected Eugene McCarthy to take him on.
And Eugene McCarthy was a very smart senator, not related to Joseph McCarthy from the 50s, who tried to firebrand everybody.
But Eugene McCarthy was the ultimate intellectual, very removed kind of guy, but he made a great hero for the peace movement.
And in fact, he ran a very good campaign up until Bobby Kennedy got in the race.
And the reason Bobby Kennedy got in the race is because he saw when McCarthy ran against LBJ.
This incredible weakness in LBJ's support.
And LBJ's Vietnam policy was the pits, and people just seemed to know that he was up to no good.
All the kind of maneuvering behind the scenes that LBJ had done to eliminate JFK and put himself in the presidency, working with those intelligence elements, had really come to naught.
He was becoming a very unpopular president.
And he was giving the deep state everything they wanted with the Tet Offensive and with all these things around Vietnam that, you know, he really was increasing that whole military thing.
He was the military's man, he was the deep state's man, but now it was costing him.
And his appearance even was degenerating heavily.
So the 1968 election is crucial for a number of reasons.
What happens is Bobby Kennedy announces he's getting into the race.
Now, there's going to be no stopping Bobby Kennedy because, for a number of reasons, he has incredibly high popularity ratings.
He's been the senator from New York for four years, he has impeccable credentials.
He comes from the Camelot Kennedy family.
He was the attorney general under John F. Kennedy, who was assassinated and who the country has great feeling for.
He's a shoo in.
He's going to win.
Nixon and Hubert Humphrey stand no chance to him in style or intellect.
It's over.
It's a ballgame.
Now, LBJ, however, the reason he steps down, you know, people said, well, it was because he had such a strong hit when McCarthy got in.
And McCarthy gave him a run for his money in the New Hampshire primary early in that year.
Bobby Kennedy sees that.
He gets into the race with no setup, no campaign apparatus, no two years of deliberations, nothing.
He just jumps in.
Which is a very spontaneous act.
And he just had a feeling that this is what he needed to do to put himself on the line.
He was only 42 years old, by the way.
So he's actually a year younger than JFK was when he got into office.
So what happens is there's a tussle and a tug of war in the Democratic Party because you have an unpopular vice president, Hubert Humphrey, who thinks that he's just entitled to it.
You have Eugene McCarthy as the peace candidate rising in the polls.
And you have LBJ who just looks terrible and everyone realizes was a deep state shill.
So, this is the nature of the situation when Kennedy gets in and he says, you know what, McCarthy's not going to be able to take the entire prize.
That means Nixon will win.
I'll come in and I'll beat McCarthy, then I'll beat Nixon.
And so, and he figures, this is before LBJ gets out now, he figures that LBJ is marshmallow now after seeing McCarthy demolish him in the New Hampshire primary.
So, RFK gets in, and just a few weeks later, we've got this incredible announcement on March 31st, 1968, that LBJ is withdrawing from the race.
Now, when you're a sitting president and you are the incumbent, no one can talk you into that on a logical basis.
There's a deep, deep reason.
The minute Bobby Kennedy enters the race, it opens up the possibility to the deep state that Bobby Kennedy will reinvestigate JFK's murder.
And they have lots of details that show that that's exactly what his plan is, as well as retaking the government apparatus.
Now, Bobby's been very quiet on the Warren Commission, he hasn't said anything disparaging about it.
But he didn't cooperate with it.
He didn't participate.
So he's been the kind of loyal soldier in the background for LBJ, but watching him closely because he's being loyal to the position of the president, but he has incredible dislike for LBJ.
And LBJ really hates him with a passion, so that hatred is mutual and always was, even when LBJ was just a vice president.
That's just something.
And Bobby Kennedy was hard nosed.
But he puts together this campaign.
It really gets off the ground running.
And Johnson realizes the minute he gets in that the deep state is going to remove Bobby Kennedy.
And he's thinking to himself, I can't sit here as the president and preside over the assassination of John F. Kennedy, from which I get the role as president, and then the assassination of Bobby Kennedy.
It's not possible.
I have to be seen as not having a dog in this race.
So I'm going to withdraw completely because what's going to happen now, I can't be associated with.
That is, if Kennedy is killed on my watch and I become the president again, people are going to really look into what I was up to.
And that's not going to work because what we have to remember is when LBJ got into office in the first place, he was under a looming indictment because he was close to the Bobby Baker scandals.
If we go back to Life magazine at the time, these were the headlines saying the Bobby Baker scandal, who was his close friend in the Senate, was getting closer and closer to LBJ.
And supposedly, Bobby Kennedy was helping that process along.
And they were looking at real evidence of bribes.
And everything else.
And Bobby Baker did go to jail, as did Billy Celestes, who was LBJ's silent business partner in Texas.
So, you know, the net was closing in on LBJ.
And in fact, the day of the assassination, Richard Nixon was in town in Dallas and he gives a press conference and he said, There's no way LBJ will be on that ticket in '64.
So it was an open secret.
Everyone knew this was what was going to happen.
And JFK had said, Actually, Behind the scenes to his secretary, Evelyn Lincoln, and others, that he was going to choose Terry Sanford from North Carolina and that that was going to be the ticket for 64.
So LBJ was out.
So convincing him to go along with the assassination and reap all the rewards and basically not be under indictment was pretty easy when you think about it.
So, this is the nature of the situation that we're looking at.
And when you look at traditional history, they'll say, you know, LBJ was shocked by this whole thing.
He gets into office and does his best.
If you go deeper into the deep politics and you look at some of the The work of people that have looked deeply at the issue, like Peter Dale Scott, or, you know, there's a whole range of people I could recommend on this subject, like Jim Mars, like Jim Garrison.
And they've informed us of the real picture of what was happening.
So these are the conditions under which LBJ is looking at that 1968 election.
When Bobby Kennedy gets in, he says to himself, the deep state is going to get rid of him.
I can't be the guy who's the recipient of that.
And It makes a lot of sense when you think about it.
So he does the unprecedented thing, which is he basically resigns the office by saying he's not going to run again.
But he also says something very telling in that speech.
He says, I'm not going to run, but I also will not accept a draft.
That is, he won't be drafted into the presidency either.
So if these deep state people are like, Look, we'll take up Bobby Kennedy and you're still going to be our guy because we know that you're dependable, he's saying, No.
Not only am I not going to run, but you can't draft me so that it still doesn't look like I wanted this.
So he sets himself up very well.
So the first thing that happens is there are these rumors that MLK is about to announce support for Robert Kennedy's candidacy.
And Kennedy, you know, he has a bumpy ride getting up and running because he has no campaign staff, he has nothing, he's just jumping into this.
But he has that entire Kennedy mystique, Kennedy name, Kennedy clout with the media.
And it starts to go his way.
Now, Martin Luther King is assassinated on April 4th.
And this is a week after he had confided to his aides that he was going to back Robert Kennedy.
There was brief talk, and we hear about this, which is that MLK was going to be Robert Kennedy's running mate.
This is 1968.
I actually don't think that that's true, but I do think that where it stems from is that RFK talked about.
Having MLK in his cabinet, which would have been amazing if you think about it.
And why it hadn't already happened under JFK or LBJ is shocking.
You could have made him a peace czar.
You could have made him an inner city czar.
There were so many different things that he could have done there.
But also, MLK was speaking out against the Vietnam War very actively, and he was convincing the minority population to really not go along with this.
And so the deep state says he's a threat.
So now we have.
MLK, he's going to back Bobby Kennedy, and then we'll have a worse situation than we had in 1963 because Bobby Kennedy knows where all the bodies are buried.
This will be Kennedy Redux 2.0, and we cannot allow it.
So, the first thing they do is they shut the lights out in Memphis and they get rid of MLK.
Now, there's a number of things around his assassination, and we have touched on it in other episodes, but we'll go deeper on that, the significance of it.
Of course, Martin Luther King had incredible.
Roots, incredible charisma, had incredible confidence using his Gandhi style method of nonviolence to basically take the government back, and he was doing it.
That combination of MLK and RFK in 68 was going to be potent.
No Hubert Humphrey or Richard Nixon was going to touch that.
They had the power of the kind of regular, everyday people, and they had the power of that the minority communities, the underprivileged, and all the rest of it.
It was going to be It was going to be a battle, but it was going to be a rolling battle.
And you could not stop Bobby Kennedy in 1968.
Now, Kennedy gets to the California primary, and it's a must win because Eugene McCarthy still has all those early victories piled up, et cetera.
Plus, they're going to let Hubert Humphrey out, who hasn't participated in any of the primaries because when he goes out, basically, he doesn't get any voters.
I'd hate to use the S word, but I have to say, as a candidate, Hubert Humphrey kind of sucked.
He was not particularly good.
They called him the happy warrior, and that was about as far as he got.
So I will say this, though this period, when Kennedy goes into California, it's about three weeks of hard work, and he goes to every neighborhood.
He goes, and it is like nothing we've ever seen in campaign politics.
People are, you know, flocking to him.
It's like Woodstock in politics, and there's just no stopping.
Bobby Kennedy.
And let's just take a quick look at Bobby here with some victories in 1968, really hurtling towards the presidency.
And we can only imagine the Bobby Kennedy presidency of 1968.
That would have been those years from 69 to 73, complete with Vietnam withdrawal, a much better relationship, ending the cycle of disrespect between the leadership and the population.
An entirely different scenario, really.
So for the deep state, it's bad news for a lot of reasons.
One, they've kept a lot of secrets.
Their power is increasing.
They've got all the drug profits.
They've got all the military industrial hardware, all that money.
Bell helicopters through the roof.
All these guys are doing great.
Everybody's been paid off.
So, this is the nature of war.
And this one's been ongoing now because, really, if you think about it, starting in earnest in 64 with the Gulf of Tonkin and that whole staged kind of incident.
And it's not that we weren't involved in Vietnam before that, we were, but we had no ground troops, and that was the big thing.
It's kind of like the Syria situation.
When we look at it from a distance, you know, we might do these little things, but to actually put troops in there on the ground is a different type of commitment, very much like the one we have in Afghanistan, which resembles the Vietnam War in a number of ways.
So.
We've got quite a situation brewing here when we get to 1968 and June.
And actually, what it is, is it's from Eugene McCarthy with the peace vote against Bobby Kennedy, who many in the peace movement saw as Johnny come lately because they were like, you know, we waited around.
We wanted you to enter, but you didn't go for it.
So Eugene McCarthy was there.
We went for it.
Yes, he's a stiff intellectual university professor, but at least he was there for us.
But that's starting to shift now.
That's starting to break.
And by the time June 5th, 1968, rolls around, Kennedy wins over 46% of the vote in California.
He's got the big momentum.
He's going on to Chicago.
He's going to win there.
And basically, he's a shoe in for the Democratic nomination.
The Republicans are going to get Nixon in there.
And as it was in 1968, Hubert Humphrey versus Nixon was about 400,000 votes difference.
So you can imagine if we remove Hubert Humphrey and all of his charm and we put Bobby Kennedy in there instead, it would have been a blowout.
And Nixon would have been beaten by a Kennedy for the second time.
But instead, they've hatched a plan now that, and they knew it, as soon as Bobby decided to run, they must have had this thing kind of sitting on the decks.
But when you get to 1968, in 67, he's giving these signals that he's not going to run.
By the time he actually jumps in, I'm sure it's a shock to their system too.
And they're thinking, okay, we're going to do something absolutely, you know, just off the charts because we have to.
Robert Kennedy 1968 Campaign Signals00:05:14
After removing MLK, which set off inner city riots, which nearly kind of destroyed.
Toward the entire country apart.
And they kill MLK at the age of 39, and they have a stooge, Patsy, and all the rest of it.
But that's a deep state action for a number of reasons.
They need to do that on their side because of the Vietnam War and because of these other issues that MLK is such a charismatic leader that they really can't get around him.
When you get to Kennedy with that, they're going to take the government back.
So I always refer to this period as the war.
And this was a war just like World War II or the Civil War, except that it's not thought of that way.
They just think of it as.
You know, oh, it was a stressful time, but you know, white liberals marching progressed the society and everybody lived happily ever after.
No, what happened was all these people got together to form a different kind of country and their leaders got assassinated.
And this other group, the deep state, was able to take over.
And, but you know, the people coming out of that era were able to get those victories that were set up by the Kennedy administration, like civil rights.
Right to vote legislation.
There were a number of things that came out of this period, you know, because the deep state's not stupid.
They don't want an out and out revolt.
They almost had one in their hands as it was.
But as it turned out, what they just wanted to make sure was that Bobby Kennedy did not enter the office of the presidency.
Now, if you look at the book Brothers, which is an excellent book, and it's got the setup of what RFK was doing in looking at his brother's assassination.
And it's very fascinating that.
The person that he mentions immediately after the assassination happens, who he should have investigated, is Howard Hughes.
Now, Howard Hughes, who shows up in the X series, he's coming up.
Howard Hughes is Hughes Electronics, Hughes Aerospace.
So the whole aerospace connection comes in again through Hughes.
But let's temporarily move directly into the assassination.
To get a handle on some of the details there.
How are we doing there, Miss Olivia?
Doing great.
Excellent.
How are the people and how are the questions?
Actually, I think they're really listening to you today.
Well, gee, that's a start, right?
It's great to have everyone here.
I'm very excited and I'm very happy to be talking about Robert Kennedy, who is someone who I think is a heroic person.
If we look back there and had suffered a lot by being deep in this milieu of protecting his brother's legacy.
And who I think did a lot to bring us the Kennedy kind of world, Kennedy history, the Kennedy memory that we know today, because he did so much behind the scenes for JFK.
And JFK had so many vulnerabilities.
And it was like RFK was in the background making sure that everybody stayed in line.
And it was absolutely crucial in order to let him shine.
And when they removed JFK, he had to face a new kind of reality, which is that.
They were playing by different rules, and those were rules as somebody from an ethical background that he couldn't compete against.
So, what he did was he resigned as attorney general and he joined the senate race in New York and he won.
He had done that on his own without his brother's help, and here he was winning the 1968 presidential campaign.
He commented to an aide just after he'd won the 68 June 5th.
Primary in California, that this was my victory, that they were cheering for me, they were voting for me, not from the memory of Jack.
And that's, I think, an important turning point for Robert Kennedy, who really, his brother had overshadowed everything in his life.
And his brother had been an incredible inspiration, of course, but there comes that time we have to stand out of the shadow, and that's what he was doing here.
So what happens is Kennedy wins, and then we have some unusual things from campaign aides who come forward later and say, you know, He was not even supposed to go through this strange part of the hotel.
And he got pushed in that direction.
And it was such a big crowd and all the rest of it that he just went out this way, which was the opposite from where the media was.
And there's a very fascinating couple of campaign aides have come out and talked about that.
So, in this side of it, you have to go through the kitchen pantry, which is the back of the Ambassador Hotel in 1968.
And back there is the security guard for that kitchen pantry.
Was a very interesting guy.
And I'm going to.
I want to point him out here.
There's a couple of really fascinating things about this guy that I want to bring into the picture, but he is the policeman there.
And his name is Stane Eugene Caesar.
And he, well, let's start with a couple of interesting things about him.
Security Guard Kitchen Pantry Ambush00:15:46
His background was working in a low level capacity for Lockheed.
Who is the military contractor who we call the United States of Lockheed?
And they've shown up so many times in my reports that I just get used to them as kind of that presence there because ultimately it's Lockheed Martin we're dealing with over and over again.
I can't tell you how many times when I've talked to Catherine Austin Fitz, that we've had this conversation about her time in Washington and how everything that she went to get in terms of the data for HUD or the data for DOD, whatever it happened to be, was always blocked by Lockheed Martin.
And how interesting it was that all the contracting paperwork that came out of HUD was run by Lockheed Martin, as were many other agencies of the federal government.
So, this military contractor really controlling all of the data of the federal government.
It's a big problem.
But Lockheed shows up over and over again in these deep state actions.
So Caesar is standing beside Kennedy, leading him by the arm through this kitchen pantry.
He's in charge of security just for this area.
And inevitably, what happens is we have this character popping out of the blue with a gun.
And that's Sirhan Sirhan, who Robert Kennedy Jr. now says he thinks is innocent of the crime of shooting his father, although he was there with a gun.
And he was firing at people, but he just didn't shoot his father.
Now, the interesting thing about Sirhan Sirhan is that he, for those who know so much about MKUltra programs and all the rest of it, his behavior, the things that he did, his general demeanor suggested somebody who was really under mind control and was deep, deep in the program.
Now, I'll take a quick look at his.
This is the notebook they found at his house.
Okay, well positioned.
It just says RFK must die a number of times over and over again.
This is typical MKUltra programming, actually, and it's a mantra style brainwashing.
And of course, they wanted this to be found after the fact to make it an easy wrap up job.
So they do a very tight job of just presenting him as an unhappy Palestinian immigrant.
He's 24 years old, he is unemployed, he doesn't even have the Texas School Book Depository job.
But they lay him out there as the culprit.
He's there and shooting.
So he's easier, in a sense, to set up than Oswald was.
But what happens as we get into the case is there's a number of inconsistencies, as you can imagine, setting him up.
The first thing is that a number of people point out the fact that this gentleman here, Caesar, the policeman security guard, or the security guard in a policeman's uniform, he's actually not a policeman, who is a Lockheed Martin worker.
He's seen with his gun drawn behind Kennedy and beside him during the shooting.
Sirhan Sirhan never comes closer than three feet to Kennedy and is in front of him.
So when Kennedy is shot during the autopsy by Thomas Noguchi, this is absolutely crucial.
Noguchi says it's scientifically impossible.
Noguchi was a really incredible coroner.
Who'd been in the job for over a decade?
He'd done the incredible high level cases like Merrill Monroe.
He was the LA County coroner.
And, you know, he said that whoever shot Senator Kennedy shot him within an inch of his ear.
So the gun was within an inch of his ear.
So this guy who's a few feet in front of him doesn't have the ability to, first of all, to stretch his gun around and shoot him in the back of the head, and also doesn't have the ability to get close enough because he is.
By everyone's description, many feet away, shooting, and then people jump on him.
So he never gets near Kennedy, actually.
So, you know, they make up all these bizarre excuses for why Noguchi was wrong.
And what they do is they lead an inquest against Gucci and they say about Noguchi, oh, he was just wrong.
He got this all wrong, and how dare he take us on and all the rest of it.
So we've got scientific evidence there from Noguchi saying it was a scientific impossibility for Sirhan Sirhan to have fired the shot that killed Robert Kennedy.
This has always been a problem.
And the LAPD had other problems, which is that people heard and saw many other shots, and there were all these pictures of holes everywhere.
From a normal estimate, it looked like 14 shots, and Sirhan Sirhan's gun only held eight shots.
So, all kinds of problems right out of the door.
And what they do is they just shut them down over and over again.
There are so many cases where the LAPD interferes in this case that we can see that they're being driven.
But I want to really spotlight one of them because it's absolutely crucial.
And it is a photographer named Scott Enyard.
Now, he shot three rolls of film, and he shot pictures before, during, and after the shooting.
When he was in the ballroom, men in suits noticed his camera.
This is after the assassination.
Now he's walking around outside waiting to hear the news.
And when they see his camera, they start to chase him.
And then the police maul him and they take away his camera.
They kept the film and they suppressed the film for 20 years.
And what happened in that legal case when they say Sirhan Sirhan is guilty, they say all the materials are locked up for 20 years.
No one can touch them.
And part of those materials, this camera with this film in it.
Now remember, he shot before, during, and after the shooting.
So.
When he's going for it, they say, No, no, you can't have those back.
And he says, What do you mean?
And they say, Oh, didn't we tell you?
Your slides were all destroyed.
All the film was destroyed.
And he said, I don't believe it.
And so he said, You know what I'm going to do?
I'm going to hire a legal agency and I'm going to hire a lawyer to take you guys on.
And he does.
And he starts getting some results.
They get afraid of this guy.
So in 1988, he writes a letter for his pictures.
They said it was destroyed.
It couldn't be provided.
When he threatened legal action, strangely enough, They sent him a letter and said, You know what?
We found it.
We found your pictures.
I want to show you some of these.
So they sent him this roll.
Boy, I have a lot of good pictures here.
Before we get into that, I just want to show you this picture of Noguchi, who said it was scientifically impossible for Sirhan to have fired the fatal shots.
That's on the record.
And when he testified in court, he wanted to give that evidence, but they just asked him these limited little questions, and that was it.
But Noguchi, After they got him fired, eventually was reinstated because they realized it was such a political mauling.
And some weird characters were behind the fact that he was getting this railroading.
One of the weirder characters that shows up in that whole thing is Frank Sinatra, who is anti Naguchi for some reason.
Figure that one out, everyone.
Let's take a look at this roll of film that they send him.
Okay, so they're showing some of the pictures from the Ambassador Ballroom.
And he's recognizing some of those as his own.
But the first thing he notices is strange is that the role of film type is different.
So they have these contact sheets ready for him, and they're like, What's your problem?
They're your pictures.
You've got the stuff before, and you have the stuff after.
And you know what?
You were never in the actual room during the shooting.
And he said, Well, yes, I was.
That's the whole point.
I was there before, during, and after the shooting.
In fact, Enyart was a 15 year old high school student.
Photographer who wanted to get these incredible pictures and had access and had set up this whole thing with the Kennedy campaign to get in there and take all these incredible pictures.
Well, they were helping him out.
So he said, I want the real pictures and the real negatives.
Give them to me.
And they said, No, basically, you've got everything.
Get laws.
So then he's like, If you've got contact sheets, that means you have negatives.
And so they're trying to stonewall him.
In the meantime, new footage from the case shows up, new photographs.
And Scott Enyert, it turns out, is right above standing on a table taking pictures during the RFK assassination.
So now they're in a fix because they realize, hmm, this guy's identified and he's there.
They still deny it's him, but they realized there's public pressure that this kid was taking pictures.
What did they do with his pictures?
Why were they giving him these other ones?
What was going on here?
And the whole thing got very dicey.
When I mentioned that he was at the ballroom and these men spotted him and started to chase him, I want to give you a shot of that also.
They were looking at him.
Through the ballroom, and they saw his camera and decided to pounce.
So, obviously, the pictures that he was taking, people were looking at that situation and they were saying, you know, it looked like there were bullets coming from every aspect of the room, not just Sirhan, Sirhan.
Now, we have this whole kind of mind control program going on with Sirhan, Sirhan.
And when they hypnotize him in his cell years later, trying to figure out and go back to what would happen, they asked him, What are you seeing when you're doing this?
And he said, I.
I have the gun in my hand and I see a target range.
So he doesn't see Kennedy.
He never remembers actually shooting Kennedy.
He thinks he's shooting at a target range.
So he's hypnoprogrammed to do the act, is the implication there.
And we get into a whole different kind of deep state program around this aspect where they've given him a certain type of programming.
And you hear very often about the girl in the polka dot dress who was with him during this whole period and at the end runs out.
And she says something to her friend that someone overhears, which is, We got it.
We finally got it.
And this whole thing, a number of people saw the girl and all the rest of it.
The LAPD shuts it down.
Even the TV people who were there that night are like, We saw her.
You know, the whole thing was unusual.
And there were a number of things I want to mention here too, which is that during this incident, there were people who came forward, like this woman who owned a gun shop with her husband.
And she said, You know, Sirhan Sirhan came into our gun shop.
A month before the assassination, and was looking for armor piercing bullets.
But here's what's interesting is it not only was he looking for this kind of interesting ammunition that we didn't have, he also was with two other people.
So, this whole thing about the group setup for Sir Han, they just wanted on the LAPD side a quick case.
And the deep state gave them the stooge, the setup, and all the rest of it.
It was an easy slam dunk, basically.
But anyway, getting back to Enyert and his photographs, Scott Enyert was in an interesting position because when they gave him these films back, it was a different type of film that he threatened further legal action.
And so magically, he said, Well, I'm opening up this court case.
And they said, As legal kind of research was going on, out of the blue, they said, Okay, we'll fly in your negatives.
We're going to bring them to you, and you can see for yourself that you weren't there during the assassination.
You were there before, and you were there after.
No problem.
They send this investigator.
He has to drive down with the negatives.
So, the investigator drives down, and along the way, he gets a flat tire.
He goes into a gas station, gets up to use the phone, comes back.
Guess what?
His briefcase is missing.
The negatives disappear.
Oh, they're never seen again.
So, that's the end of that.
So, to recap, the LAPD has this photographer who they mauled in the first place.
It was just a kid, he was 15, but he had the photos of what was going on in that room.
Later, a picture surfaces supporting his story of being in there.
We've seen the picture.
What he was taking pictures of was the real shooter who actually shot Senator Kennedy.
Now, what's interesting about this is we know that Caesar was the security guard from Lockheed Martin who was guarding this part of the kitchen pantry.
Where, by the way, if he was a good guard, Sirhan Sirhan wouldn't have been there in the first place.
And second of all, Kennedy wasn't supposed to be there because they let him down in this strange direction.
And the campaign aide said, Where's these unknown people saying it's too crowded that way, the way we were going to the press announcement?
Go back behind this way.
They get him into this situation, and then there's an ambush.
But there's always things that can go wrong with any deep state plan.
And when we get into this situation, what happens is RFK is assassinated, and they have this kind of fanatic who's under mind control doing the job.
But Enyark, they didn't count on, and his photographs, they didn't count on.
And so they had these issues.
And so finally, in the grand expanse of things, they just had to say they got stolen while they were being delivered to the courthouse.
And that's where that tells us that the LAPD was working closely with the deep state to make sure we didn't see who was really doing the shooting.
Now, do we know that Caesar was doing the shooting?
Not necessarily.
But what they decided to do.
Was a number of witnesses came forward and said, We saw Caesar with his gun out.
So the natural thing would have been for the police to have checked his gun.
They didn't, which is absurd because he was right there with Kennedy.
And by the mere fact that he's a security guard hired by the hotel, that wouldn't exclude him.
They would have tested him.
When they did the actual trial, another weird thing happened, which is the gun.
That was used in the assassination by Sirhan Sirhan was not allowed into evidence.
So they used a gun that was like it to do all the testing and all this stuff.
They wouldn't use his actual gun because it would have showed that there was more than one gun involved.
A couple of quick things.
I'll just take another look at Caesar here to get an idea because Caesar is a damn good candidate for having pulled the trigger, I have to say, but at least he should be investigated 50 years out, dead or alive.
This is an interesting report by someone I want to point out.
His name is Don Shulman.
And Don Shulman is particularly interesting because he was a witness who was close to Kennedy and during this whole shooting.
Testing Gun Multiple Shooters Claim00:05:45
And what he said to all the television people and all the rest of it.
And he's a reporter for KNXT TV News.
He's one of the guys.
And he says, Well, Caesar had got his gun out.
And all the shooting was going on.
He doesn't say that Caesar shot Kennedy, but he definitely says that Caesar got his gun out, which Caesar denies.
Later in 1971, two years after the trial, questions continue to surface about Caesar.
And Caesar decides to give an interview where he says, Well, you know, look, I've talked so much about this.
What can I tell you?
You know, and he said, They said, Did you have a gun that was a.38?
And he said, No, my gun was a different type of gun.
And he goes into this, and then he talks to another reporter and he changes his story.
And he says, Well, I had a gun like that, but it wasn't my gun that was used.
And he's just really shape shifting all through the story and leading this incredible trail of contradictory statements.
So he's under pressure, and he starts to say that he has a kind of a thing against the Kennedys.
It's like he's really breaking down, and he says, Well, you know, they destroyed this country and all the rest of it, so he's letting a lot out.
And what they decide to do with him basically is they stage a mock.
Lie detector test where he's going to take it and the LAPD is going to be happy about that while he doesn't show up for it.
So, questions would rage in documentaries over the years about Caesar.
And I guess the closer we get to Caesar, the closer we get to what happened because even if he didn't actually pull the trigger and kill Senator Kennedy, he was right there beside him and he knew that the shot came from behind, which doesn't fit the deep state official narrative on this.
So, one of the reasons RFK Jr. is asking the case to be reopened is because all of this stuff was unknown to him.
So, what does he do?
He goes to visit Sirhan Sirhan in prison a few months ago.
Now we have to remember RFK Jr. has said that his father didn't believe the conclusions of the Warren Commission and he thought the CIA was involved in his brother's assassination.
Now the Kennedys have kept pretty mum silence.
They've supported the Warren Commission over the years.
This is the first break and it's massive because.
RFK Jr. has been pretty brave on a number of issues like the link between autism and excessive mercury in vaccines.
He's not just a general vaccine, you know, anti vax guy.
He's just against certain types of vaccines that have proven to be absolutely detrimental in health studies.
And, you know, he's really stood up for different issues.
Here he is, I think, face to face with this, and he's the first Kennedy coming forward.
Saying, and we know that a number of the other Kennedys knew what was going on.
They understood that they were under siege and they understood that their family members had been removed as leaders.
But what happened basically with this is there's a breakthrough going on because when he talks to Sirhan, Sirhan, he spends this time with him and he decides he is not the person.
And he calls now in the last week for a new investigation.
That's big.
Let me tell you, it's big because there's a lot of deep state.
Secrets sitting in the middle of that, just like in the JFK records.
So, President Trump has an incredible opportunity to move in these areas.
And if he just hangs back and lets the deep state and CIA run the table on this, then he's allowing them more power in the situation.
As a matter of fact, this is one of those vulnerable moments where he might actually be able to get a real investigation going.
And that's what they should do.
That should be the kind of transparency that we get.
This file copy is interesting because what they say in it is that this is a police record now.
We were just talking about the reporter who said, Hey, actually, I saw this.
And he said that I saw Caesar beside Kennedy and his gun was drawn.
So, in here, what it says is that this is the police record now to shut it down.
They said, Yes, he works for KNX TV News.
He was working as a file runner at Ambassador Hotel.
He arrived at the hotel from 5 to 6, worked the camera crews inside the embassy room just prior to Kennedy coming down to make a speech.
He stationed himself just inside a door at the east end of stage.
So he could signal the camera crew when Kennedy and his entourage arrived.
He went to the area just inside the doorway to observe the direction Kennedy was leaving and the doors just outside the serving kitchen.
As we know, he went right through the kitchen and the pantry.
Through the double doors, he saw a woman bleeding and he saw Kennedy on the floor.
He did not see the actual shooting or the suspect due to the crowd.
He saw no woman in a polka dot dressed.
He did not take photos.
And so there's no, he didn't see the security guard.
It's a complete denial of everything that he said, which is he did see the woman in the polka dot dress.
He did see the security guard with gun drawn and all the rest of it.
So they just make the interviews fit the narrative and they're off and running with the story.
So this is the way that the assassination was handled, but it left all these things.
Now, RFK Jr., coming out and calling for a new investigation, threatens to blow all of these statements and all of that sky high.
RFK Jr New Investigation Threat00:02:43
And what they're going to find is that.
Lockheed's Caesar here was in a lot deeper with this whole situation, and that the LAPD somehow protected him and didn't even call him to trial or research his gun.
They didn't even test his gun.
So that's massive.
And on the 50th anniversary of the RFK assassination, to have a call by a Kennedy family member to reopen the case, I think is absolutely gigantic.
And with that, I see Alexander Bruce is here.
Alexander, I can't hear you though.
It's one of those, but I'm sure we're going to get you.
But while we're doing that, Miss Olivia, how are you doing over there and how are the questions going?
Well, I'll just, should I throw out a question right away?
Yes.
Okay, so JJK is asking, is Caesar still alive?
We were discussing that earlier today, and you think he is.
Yeah, well, this is an interesting thing about Caesar, which is, as it stands, supposedly, Caesar left with his family and went to Indonesia.
Now, there was a report that he died, and then there's another report where the family didn't confirm it and said, no, he's still alive.
So there he is in obscure land in Indonesia.
He's an elderly person now because in 1968, which is 50 years ago, he was already, I think he was in his 30s.
So he's certainly in his 80s now.
And in terms of his actual status, the person that I've reached out to about this is William Pepper, who has done extensive research around this.
But as it stands, there's some confusion about whether he's still with us or not.
How's Alexandra doing?
Alexandra?
Okay.
Well, we're not hearing you.
Fascinating.
Shut down of Miss Alexandra.
It could be, you know, the thing to do if you have a mic plugged in, unplug the mic.
No.
Yeah, you did it.
Why don't you, well, check, do all the troubleshooting stuff, or maybe.
Hang in there for a second because sometimes the stream will just catch up with you.
The other thing I can recommend is log back in.
But that's interesting.
I do remember we haven't had this sound problem in a long time, but the last time we had it, it was Alexandra, as I recall.
Do you remember that one?
But it's great to have everyone here.
I think what we'll do while Alexandra is sorting that out is.
You want another question?
Yes.
UFO Phenomenon Dollar Suppression Link00:11:48
Okay.
David Donaway asks Did Jean Dixon talk to John and Bobby Kennedy?
Did she see any of this?
She did.
And she made a prediction publicly.
There she is, Alexandra.
Good evening.
I can hear you.
It's amazing.
Hi.
How are you?
Good.
How are you?
Fantastic.
Your volume's jacked up maybe a little bit.
If you can take it down.
Yeah, maybe I exaggerated before.
Yeah.
It's like flip it through the ceiling.
Turn it up.
How's this?
It's still loud.
It's still kind of loud.
Okay.
But only because I want to hear you just right.
Okay.
How about this?
How about this?
That's good.
That's good.
So I'll just wrap that up, which is that Jean Dixon did.
And in fact, she recommended that RFK not run in 1968.
She had predicted the Kennedy assassination, and that was on record.
And here she was again saying that if he runs for president, he will die in Los Angeles.
So it was an incredibly eerily prescient prediction on her part.
And Jean Dixon, who I've gone over again and again, that I think she was the most powerful person.
In America, most powerful woman in America for quite some time, giving this kind of advice that would change policy at a presidential level.
I can't imagine anyone else doing that.
But she was the secret sage for presidents from Roosevelt all the way through to Reagan.
And of course, her relationship with Nixon was crucial and documented.
Interestingly enough, what happened was people who were researching for the 9 11 Commission stuff were looking back at terrorism policy and they ran across these records of Gene Dixon.
Talking or visiting with President Nixon on security, national security matters, over 80 times, which I find absolutely fascinating.
But with that, Alexandra, we've been talking about the RFK 50th anniversary of the assassination, and RFK Jr. has come forward and said that he's spoken now with Sirhan Sirhan and he doesn't believe that he was responsible for killing Senator Kennedy and that he wants a new investigation, which is kind of mind blowing.
It is mind blowing.
I mean, I think it's theater.
I mean, I think he's probably had misgivings about.
The conviction his whole life.
But I mean, I think it says more about the era that we're in.
And I've been told that basically the last main person who's alive, who was involved with the JFK assassination, is going to be dead within three months, and that's George Bush Sr.
And that with his death, we will get the remainder of those files that we were waiting for back in November.
Right, right.
And that is really fascinating, too, because.
It's tricky though, because I'll tell you why I don't buy that.
Because W is his son.
So the whole rationale about.
Okay, no, well, it has to do with everything else that's going on, which is the currency reset that's going to happen in our lifetimes, if nothing, if never.
Right, right, right.
But basically, what I've been told, you know, there's been a lot of really great work done showing how the crown, the British crown, is still very much in control of.
Large institutions, major institutions of the United States.
Things like airports, prisons, railways, and just not only the United States, but many northern European countries, some Asian countries, some South Asian countries.
And that in the US, the way that these are sort of no bid contracts, it goes through Circo, which is the biggest corporation that nobody's ever heard of.
They're like Google before Google was Google.
And I guess that they're being sued and they might go out of business soon.
Wow.
A massive, you know, big data company.
And this is, they, you know, have contracts all over the world to manage, as I was saying, you know, airports, ports, railways, prisons, parking meters, you know, this sort of thing.
Incredible.
And that all of that goes back, it's controlled by the British Crown.
And what we find is that the Bush and Clinton people are associated with that axis of power, with the Crown.
Right.
That basically, apparently, They wanted to usurp the right to issue of the Federal Reserve, the New York Federal Reserve Bank, or I guess the US Federal Reserve System.
They wanted to take that for themselves.
And I guess we're going to try to cement that with Hillary's presidency.
And that's part of the behind the scenes of what's going on.
That is fascinating.
The greatness that we're witnessing right now is that.
Well, let's look at the picture of how they can roll this stuff out.
I had a conversation with Catherine Austin Fitz where she said, you know, if you look at people like David Rockefeller and if you look at the Bushes and that whole wing that was in control for so long, that one of the things that they had going for them in all of their shenanigans is that they cared about their image.
But she felt that the crew that was replacing them was actually a step down because they didn't care about their image and they were ready to use very predatory technology without any kind of worry about how they were going to appear doing it because they were that confident.
What do you think of that?
Well, I think that there's something to that.
I think, you know, it might be generational in part.
You know, these, you know, the Clintons are boomers and sort of let it all hang out type of thing.
And I don't know, that could be part of it.
But, you know, you see her.
What's interesting is that in Clinton's book tour, most of these stops, I think 90% of them, are offshore.
They're not in the United States.
She's not big things in the United States.
She's not very popular here.
Yeah, I'm not really sure what.
That signifies, but it's an interesting thing to notice.
It's interesting, yeah.
Well, we started the year with all the weird New York Times UFO stuff.
Then there seemed to be some kind of give and take around certain issues.
And I showed this earlier, which is the article, which is the Bobby Kennedy article where RFK is asking for a new investigation, is run in the Washington Post, which we know is a CIA front for the most part and has been since Ben Bradley was the.
Editor and Catherine Graham owned it.
So, what's going on there?
Do they realize that these topics and these subjects are now so ubiquitous and that there's so much connecting on them that they can't deny them anymore, but they can co opt them?
I think once again, this goes back to the petrodollar and the currency reset because petrodollar is based on petroleum, right?
And what the whole UFO thing represents is alternative energy.
Okay, so give me a little more of that.
Well, I think that it's all sort of coalescing, and I think it's kind of.
Gonna all come out at the same time, and it's part of why the U.S. is the country that is the most, you know, vicious about suppressing the UFO phenomenon or else doing it in the most limited hangout way, like the Washington Post is doing, is because of the threat to the dollar by a viable alternative energy system.
Right, right, right, totally.
Because our whole currency is pegged to petroleum.
And we've been running the planet this way.
And it's not going to last too much longer.
I mean, we're looking at Saudi Arabia going green.
They've said it, we're going to go green.
They're building this green city.
And they're not saying we want to diversify.
They're saying we're going to go green.
So that's saying a lot.
Wow, it's incredible.
What it's saying is to the dollar is what that's saying.
Well, since we're talking about currency and such, they've had all this incredible roller coaster stuff about Bitcoin.
Some of the key people.
Like Cliff High, who was really behind it, has taken a position lately that he's not going to deal with that anymore.
And you know, Cliff has his own reasons for doing things.
A number of people have started to kind of go in this opposite direction for Bitcoin.
What's happening?
Well, a paper came out.
I haven't looked too much into it, but a paper came out that was published in 1996 that was describing everything about the blockchain and making a cryptocurrency.
And it was published, it was created by actually two women who were on the staff who wrote the white paper on how to do this, and it was the NSA.
So it appears that cryptocurrencies weren't the brainchild of Satoshi Nakamoto.
After all.
And who was behind them?
Well, you know, the NSA was one of them.
I mean, you can't say that only one person ever came up with this idea and presented it, but.
I'll go back to Fitz again on this.
It's interesting to me.
You and I have talked a lot about Bitcoin, actually, ups and downs, pros and cons, and all the rest of it.
One of the things that she said is that they've been looking for a digital currency for a long time on this kind of deep state side, and that their best chance at that was Bitcoin.
And so they ran it up to kind of test it out and see how it would perform.
Now, The question is, how did that go?
And are they going to adopt blockchain as the new digital currency?
Well, you know, the way it went is that the SEC classified it as a security, and so it started behaving like a security and not like a currency.
Right.
But that's also because of the limited nature of it.
Right.
It has all the qualities of a collectible, you know, not even a security, but sort of like rare art or something like that, you know.
Right.
So, I'm not sure.
There's Hashgraph.
There are other systems that create the currency faster.
They're going to duke it out.
I can't say that I'm the hugest expert on all of this.
I sort of stopped following it after I didn't sell in December, and I just don't think about it.
You'll get another chance.
I know.
I was playing Cliff.
That's why.
Oh, no.
That's why I hold.
I was going to say, I did tell you to sell.
I know you did.
It's great though, because you're going through those kind of undulations and roller coaster like everybody else.
I don't know if I got lost that much.
I bought two back then.
You started with almost nothing with it.
It was incredible.
I think it's fascinating.
I always think that you have a good pulse on what they're doing with those things.
The other thing you have a great pulse on is that you keep a very close watch on these reports that come out.
And one of them, which you're telling me about, is absolutely fascinating, which is the Deagle report.
Yeah.
Tell me about that.
Well, you know, I've been watching that for three plus years now.
Nuclear Apocalypse Population Losses00:03:46
What is it?
Okay.
So it's a site that purports to be, it monitors the, Armaments purchases of different countries, and it also keeps tabs.
It's like a merge of, and it's constantly changing.
So it's almost like a ticker tape, like it'll change every quarter, maybe.
Right.
And it says that it basically is publicly available information published by the CIA and the IMF and the World Bank and other US government data, and that there's nothing woo woo about it.
And that it's just basically publicly available data.
Now, the thing, what they're saying is that you're looking at the crazy part has to do with their forecast for 2025.
Okay.
That is saying that the United States population is going to plummet from 367, what it is today officially, to 99 million in 2025.
That's a 70% decline in population.
How do they represent it?
Like, what would be the cause of something like that?
Well, they're saying it's going to be the collapse of the Western banking system.
And that it will be for migration, mostly migration, and there will obviously be death.
They say that the young people are going to be forced to migrate because the economy will be completely devastated.
They'll migrate mainly to South America and China.
And when you do see, like, they have Brazil's population going up by now by 3 million.
Brazil's population has been shrinking.
So there's nothing in the Brazilian paperwork that's saying that their population is growing.
It's not, it's going down.
They don't have.
The replacement birth rate required to grow right now.
So, so they would gain 3 million in seven years.
Well, um, the other country that is like even more devastated is interestingly and significantly the UK will lose 75% of its population from down from 65 to like 15, something crazy like that.
I mean, that almost sounds nuclear or something.
It does sound nuclear, but then if you really look at the pattern of the other countries that are, um, That's my landlord.
If you look at the, you know, Russia's.
There was a little bit of a possibility of a gray back there.
Everyone's always looking for a gray in your window.
I get these.
I think I saw a gray back there.
It's a classic window for gray, for sure.
So, yeah, well, it's definitely not going to be, you know, we have mutually assured destruction.
When I asked my former, you know, intelligence friend what he thought, when he looked at it, he said, Well, the only way that that would be possible would be with some kind of incredible pandemic, some kind of a virus, because it doesn't look nuclear because of the other countries that are very hard hit are France, which borders UK.
Right, right, right.
Spain does not do well, but that's also because so much of the investment in Spain, all the retirees from England pretty much go to Spain.
Right, right.
I think because Spain is very tied to the.
Well, if you go to, you said 99 million.
We have 320 million in America now.
So you're talking about losing 220 million people.
I mean, yeah, asteroid, right?
Well, the UK and the United States, you know, and then it sort of spills out on the economies that are tied in.
GCR Currency Reset Economic Impact00:03:08
It used to look like Australia used to look really bad, but it doesn't anymore, right?
I think probably a lot of Americans will try to go there if this is right.
Now, what he said is that he thinks that this is disinformation.
He, uh, so your friend who's the insider, he thinks Deagle is disinformation, you know, he's gonna look at it some more, but he thinks that it's okay.
He thinks more along the lines, this is what he thinks about the GCR currency reset.
He thinks that, yes, it's going to happen.
It will be a global digital currency, but that the US will not be taken out by it.
He says it actually, he thinks that Donald Trump is going to be, has negotiated for this and that we will not be screwed.
And because he's argued that, you know, because basically what we've been looking at, Our whole, you know, since the 90s is basically for China to replace us.
Right.
And in many ways, you know, they have.
I mean, as far as consumption of petroleum, they.
Yeah.
I mean, and also, well, they basically adopted our ability to manufacture.
Yeah.
I mean, well, it's because all of our manufacturing was sent there.
Right.
And it was almost like a suicidal thing, you know, for the country, but not for the individual businesses, you know.
Well, I'd like to feel good about some of the changes with Trump.
There's a lot of weird things going on.
Some of the things, you know, there are all these great financial numbers that came out today, which always feels a little bit uneasy, doesn't it?
And it was like, you know, 3.8 unemployment, the lowest since 2000, right?
Incredible.
And like the manufacturing jobs are growing.
And Trump is doing tariffs on steel from other countries and all the rest of it, which is something that everyone has been talking about since the 90s was the smart thing to do.
But what's interesting about this is that in the middle of all this, They iced the Iran deal, one.
They got John Bolton as national security advisor, Bush holdover, and then Gina Haspel at CIA, who ran black sites for the CIA during the whole torture thing.
That doesn't add up.
On one track, he's going along strong, and this other track, there's an 80s, like a 2000s neocon trip.
Is Condy Rice going to show up?
Excellent.
What I've heard for the people with The rah, rah Trump crowd, what they say is that he basically, you know, you know how he hires people and fires people.
Basically, he hires these globalists, these neocons, he sucks their brains and then he fires them.
And so maybe, hopefully, that's what he.
I love your version of that because if that's what's going on, great.
But it seemed to me that they're positioning themselves to go back to that rhetoric around Iran, like, we won't let these thugs, you know, they started bringing up.
Let's remember that they grabbed 50 Americans, you know, 1979.
Las Vegas Police Paddock Room Report00:06:43
Yeah, I know.
I've also seen a lot of crazy right wing rhetoric around supporting the Shah of Iran's son, who's, I guess, in his like 60s now, trying to reinstate him, like overthrow the theocracy and put him in.
And he would say, I don't want to be the king.
I just, I'm the only person who can do this right now.
I want us to be a.
Democracy.
That's allegedly what's going on.
That's crazy.
You know, well, Trump survived the deep state assault, you know, getting into.
McCabe was, he's under a criminal investigation now as of like an hour ago.
Oh, that's, did they say it?
Yes.
Unbelievable.
Wow.
So, this is why Forbidden Knowledge TV is a must, everyone.
You stay right with it.
I was doing a big thing, by the way, on sites that we should trust and like the sites that are really bringing it.
And what was fascinating is there's some kind of, oh, you sent me something on it too.
But I had seen this, which was a listing of some conference that was going on.
It was like an online conference, and Ray McGovern was a part of it.
It was all about, Deep state type issues, and in there, when they were listing who has been censored the most, right in there was forbiddenknowledgetv.net.
Oh, I didn't see that, I did not.
I'll send that to you, but I thought you'd like that because you know they had they listed a number of sites, obviously, but yours was right in there.
Oh, good, and I have no doubt that that's what they do, which is censor forbiddenknowledgetv.net.
We've gone through that for years, yeah.
When you're on like a total nerd like me and is on a computer for decades now, like you can like feel it, you can feel what's going on on the internet.
Yes.
And like they're algorithmically like screwing with me totally.
Absolutely.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, no doubt about it.
But you have a very dedicated base.
This is important, I think, because it's hard.
You can't fool those people, you know.
So that kind of engineering, all they can try to do is mess up when you send the newsletter or whatever it happens to be.
But you.
Totally crazy story.
Did we talk about this yet?
Las Vegas.
Which one?
Las Vegas.
Yeah.
That's what I was going to get to because we're covering now on Forbidden Knowledge TV.
You're going to bring this up.
Yeah, well, I haven't run because I actually posted it.
It ran yesterday.
Okay.
Basically, this is nuts.
The AP, what is it?
The American, whatever they are, it's the new.
Associated Press.
Associated Press, right.
The AP sued the Las Vegas Metro Police Department to release their call records.
And they were released on May 23rd.
We haven't heard anyone talk about that, have we?
Wow.
So what did they find?
Okay, so only one mainstream news agency broadcast a story about it, and that was the ABC TV affiliate in Las Vegas.
No mainstream press about it.
No alt media videos or stories about it.
You mentioned it.
I hadn't heard of it.
Right, exactly.
I hadn't heard about it, and it was a friend who noticed it, and it was because G. Edward Griffin's site posted it.
Need to know what need to know, I think is KNOW.
KNOW is his site.
And shocking, shocking is okay, what it said is that thousands of people called the Las Vegas Police Department to report active shooter situations in over 12 casino hotels, just like all those witnesses whose videos I posted back in October.
So they were completely vindicated.
My people who are.
Claiming that this happened, and everyone is, you know, and I got all kinds of, I got a very particular kind of brand of email from older, let's say, guys over 70 years old from Las Vegas who were probably former spooks or whatever.
Right.
Who are all telling me, oh no, it was only in Mandalay Bay, and that was it, it was a paddock, and that's the end of the story.
Wow.
I mean, you have all these witnesses saying something else.
That's weird.
That's weird.
You know, like, I'm not going to mention names, but some pretty classic people emailed me.
No, I think I know one of them.
Yeah.
It's pretty interesting because here's the deal with that.
Right then, a number of weird things happened.
We did the special on JFK.
The records were supposed to come out October 26th.
We had the weird announcement of the TTSA Academy to the Stars BS from the CIA, its own DeLong Group.
Then, so you had the block on the records.
That was the first weird thing.
The Las Vegas shooting seemed to really kick off this whole era.
Then you got weird things like.
You know, the Q thing, which turned into a total fantasy thing.
And even Julian Assange put out a warning about all that stuff, saying it was completely co opted.
And so, this whole period, though, that showed up right then in that period.
And then you had all the weird school shootings after that.
But Las Vegas seemed to be the kickoff.
Right.
Yeah.
Then you had, remember the seizure of the Arab princess.
Right.
Yes, exactly.
I still haven't gotten an answer.
My deep throat person won't.
Go there as far as the Las Vegas thing is serious as cancer.
If I start telling you what I think it is, which I don't even know because nobody will tell me, literally somebody will come to my door and kill me.
So I'm not good, you know.
But since you've got the deep gray security guards around you, it's not going to get very far.
What I can tell you is that there were multiple shooters, there were in multiple hotels.
That was released by the Las Vegas Police Department.
So I can say that.
And not only that, there were three women in.
Paddock's room.
He wasn't home.
Tell me about that part.
What's the deal there?
I don't know, but what we want to find out, we want to have the people who are actually good at this stuff try to find a public case number for any police reports for these things that have been released.
I was too busy.
I was literally on the phone for four hours today getting a lot of this stuff for you.
Wasn't able to actually drill down and get into the documents.
No, that's great.
This is fantastic.
Laura Loomer Facts Time Release00:03:10
I think just the fact that you're focusing.
Maybe look into Laura Loomer's work because I think she reported on it.
Yeah.
She was one of the only people in the alt media, and then I picked it up.
And then I think I'm the only.
That's it.
The three of us are it.
As far as talking about it.
Like, you know, Jake Morfunios, who covered it to death at the time, he's talking about something else right now, which is odd because, you know, this was.
I think it was.
Well, there's a weird thing about some people seem to go for what's hot and headline worthy.
And when they get information after the fact, they kind of drop the ball.
That's the kind of consistency I think.
Well, we've seen him and others lose their channel too.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
I'm not actually very familiar with his stuff, but it's not him in particular I'm talking about.
But I find that an interesting trend because I stay on things to the last drop because that's the way that situations work.
Look at the JFK assassination.
It takes 55 years to unwind a plan like that.
The UFO thing, the cover up starts in earnest in 47.
You've got 70 years of that kind of unwinding.
I mean, you know, that's the way it works.
So you have to be there.
When I look at the whole RFK situation that we started the show off with, and we think about 50 years later, RFK Jr., one of the Kennedy families finally coming forward to say something about it, these are the things, you know, like you, these things take time, but the facts are there on the ground.
As long as the facts are there, You can animate anything.
Well, usually the time limit is 50 years for those kind of secrets.
They're supposed to be released after 50 years.
And so it's 50 years now.
Yeah.
I will say, though, that whenever they promise that, it seems like in key areas around assassinations, around the UFO file, around these different types of things, that doesn't seem to come to pass, right?
It doesn't seem like they start to let those things out on any particular schedule.
They say, well, you know, it seems like after 50 years, and it goes, oh, it's after 75 years, and they just keep pushing it out and pushing it out.
One of the things that we found in the X series is that there's an X letter at the LBJ Library, which is to be released 50 years after his death.
And we have Eisenhower's time capsule, which is 1953.
That's supposed to be opened in 100 years.
That's 2053.
And that's Project X.
These things are set up to be released at a certain period of time.
I think that they're guessing in advance well, within that period of time, this will come out.
Therefore, I want my role in it revealed.
Yeah, something like that.
It is.
It is.
Yeah, absolutely fascinating.
When you're looking at some of the trends that are going on for 2018, I've been talking a lot about space economy trends and all these things that are pushing up about space and Trump talking about a space force.
What do you think is happening there?
Well, I saw something very hilarious.
Assassination Attempts Controlled Rollout00:04:50
I have a few things to say about that.
You know, like the Xinhua news agency for China.
China is orbit the moon.
They're getting ready.
And it showed their astronauts in one of those Chinese deserts training.
And it really looked as even faker than NASA stuff.
And that's the joke that I've been hearing.
For the people who believe that we didn't go to the moon, they're getting ready to fake their own moon landing.
Right.
Well, there's a certain truth to that.
I bet it's true.
Let's, Olivia, you can say hi to Alexandra.
Hi, Alexandra.
Hi, how are you?
I'm good.
So, would you like to take a question?
Sure.
Okay.
So, what is the point of the Las Vegas cover up?
Good one.
Well, I mean, from the reports that I got, I mean, all I can say is what I heard because I don't know.
It's nobody's, even the people who kind of know aren't telling me.
Okay.
It's deadly.
It's some deadly information.
What it sounds like is that there was a full blown terrorist attack in Las Vegas.
And they, I don't know, for whatever reason, they don't want us to know that.
Interesting.
It's a bad look for everyone that this occurred on U.S. soil, that a terrorist attack of that magnitude.
I guess that's my guess.
There's a theory out there about it being an assassination attempt on Mohammed bin Salman.
Do you know anything about that?
Yeah, I've heard that.
I don't think it's true.
I mean, yes, it's true that the top three or four floors of the Mandalay Bay Hotel building are owned jointly by Bill Gates and.
It's Prince bin Talal, who was one of the people who was held prisoner by Salma.
So, no, he wasn't.
There's been a lot of gossip about assassination attempts.
Even this week, there was apparently they shot down a drone over the palace and they were saying that it was an assassination attempt.
No, they shot down a drone according to the Saudi palace, whatever.
Apparently, he's fine.
But he's the heir apparent to the Saudi.
He's going to be the king of Saudi Arabia.
And he's pretty, I guess, de facto running it now.
And he's very young.
He's in his early 30s.
And he was not in Las Vegas when that happened.
But the hotel, like I'm saying, the Four Seasons Hotel is the top five floors of that building, of the Mandalay Bay Hotel.
And that is owned, as I said, by what's his name?
Bintalal.
Abdulaziz Bintalal, who is the super liberal friend of Obama and the Clintons.
And he was in a Twitter war with Trump saying that he was an atrocity.
Before the election, and then afterwards, now he's sort of tweeting more nicely after getting out of custody.
Unbelievable.
What else you got?
Well, should we go straight into the mass shootings?
So, Ant Gummy Bears is asking Are the mass shooters mind controlled like Sarhan Sarhan?
Good question.
Yeah, there's no doubt about it.
I know that, for example, this Parkland shooting, I really find it hard to believe that this kid did that all by himself.
And there are reports of people in full body armor shooting at the hallways.
So, you know, teachers on mainstream TV saying, I saw this guy with full body, you know, saying, oh, the cops are here already is what the teacher said.
So, there's something weird going on with that story.
There's no question about it.
I think there's a controlled rollout around these things.
Not all the time, but you can always spot certain types of symptoms.
Whenever they go to change a policy, that's a classic.
Kind of deep event, and that's where you see these deeper elements reaching.
It's all about this assault weapon, and and um, yes, you know, when most mass shooters use like 70% of them use handguns, so it just is an emotional plea, you know, a ploy or whatever.
Like, we shouldn't have weapons of war in the school and all this stuff, but you know, I this place is freaking nuts, man.
It's got it's very disturbing.
Uh, they've tried this whole thing with the You know, the student walkout around this.
This is like the March for Your Lives.
Yeah, right, right.
Alt-Wright was calling the March Against Our Rights.
March Against Our Rights Disturbance00:03:17
Yeah, yeah.
Right, exactly.
It's like, please take our rights away now.
Okay, keep going.
Okay, so Mikolas Mikolas wants to ask Alexandra your opinion on the This Is America music video.
I don't know what that is.
I don't know.
Okay, keep rolling.
Okay.
Your opinion on soul snatching?
Soul snatching?
Is that in the video?
Yeah.
I think you better keep rolling.
What else you got?
All right, Ronin returns.
Do you think that a fake or false alien revelationslash invasion will be forthcoming in the coming years and that this will lead to a one world government?
I think that that's been a contingency for a while and it was sort of apparently released during a.
One of those leaks that happened during the campaign, remember?
This is the Benson group.
Bennett Bennett Bennettson group, right.
Project Firesign.
You reported on this.
We did a whole thing on it before the election.
Right.
And then when I spoke to my deep throat guy about it, he said that his admiral friend was furious that that information came out about Firesign, about this laser device that can create 3D images in the sky.
Yes.
And that.
He was furious.
He said that basically any employee at the Beninson Group that saw that information would have to go to jail because that is like the most high security information.
It's like a breach of total breach of national security.
It was very strange.
One thing that seemed legitimate about it is the actual document itself seemed totally legitimate, which I think is hard to do.
So, whoever put it together certainly knew how those campaign documents looked.
And it was weird things because it was using on the letterhead, it was using their old stationery because they had already moved offices.
So, that was a little like, what's that all about?
You know, maybe it was someone who was inside the campaign and left.
That was the kind of impression I got who just patched it together.
But there is something strange about that because we know the whole phony UFO push through Podesta, through DeLong, came out of the Clinton connection.
Absolutely.
If anyone's going to use that as an excuse, it's the crown.
That's what it boils down to because now we've heard, we figured out that the Clinton Bush cabal is in cahoots with the crown.
They were trying to take over the Federal Reserve Bank and.
Timothy Geithner was the guy who outed that, and he had to step down from his job as Secretary of the Treasury under Obama as a result.
But he had previously been President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank under Clinton.
Right, yeah.
Oh, I think it is fascinating.
Okay, you're right.
I actually have a great question here from Plays Live.
Do you think the constant cognitive dissonance around these events is part of a longer term approach?
To fully fracture the psyche, both mass and individual, yes, absolutely.
I absolutely agree.
Timothy Geithner Federal Reserve Outing00:04:43
You know, it's interesting though, because that's the very heart of the work that you're doing with Forbidden Knowledge TV and we do with Dark Journalist.
And what I want to remind people to go to Forbidden Knowledge TV.net, sign up for your newsletter because they get the videos daily and they get your own essays about what they are.
But you get those every day, and that's a fascinating service.
So, you want to do that.
You want to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for the newsletter because it's a good way for us to stay in touch.
One of the things that I think is interesting about this is we've seen so many YouTube channels go down.
And you and I have kept an eye on that and YouTube's censorship policies, but it seems like they've been rolling out.
They haven't gone full fledged, they haven't done a real purge, but they've been rolling out tests.
Well, how about Roseanne?
I mean, talk about sending it shill.
Yeah, number one rated show on ABC gets axed because of one tweet.
I'm sorry, but you know, Valerie Jarrett is about as black as I am.
I mean, how is Roseanne supposed to know, right?
Right, right.
You know, she's black.
I mean, I'm sorry, she's like, she's not even an octoroon.
Well, that's fascinating.
Is they had a thing right afterwards about Samantha B, who does that stupid comedy stuff, and uh.
She was using all the foul language about Ivanka Trump.
It's like they want people to focus on the stupidest things.
They want to get us locked into that little game of like, what did Samantha B say?
What did Roseanne say?
And it's this weird thing where they get you away from the bigger issues that you and I are covering.
This is how this war that's going on within our government is actually being played out against us in the media.
And we're being subjected to this fracturing craziness.
I mean, like, You make a dumb tweet.
I mean, if you actually look at the portrayal in the Planet of the Apes by, what's her name?
Helena Bonham Carter.
It's the 2001 version.
It's actually, she's a beautiful, she's gorgeous and white skinned, by the way.
With sort of little nasal slits that are actually very much like Valerie Jarrett's nose.
That's it.
I mean, she was actually, if anything, it was a compliment to call.
I mean, I don't want to get your show accent or me.
YouTube is cutting off the slides.
They were like.
But I mean, really, it was that character played by Helena Bonham Carter was actually beautiful.
Okay, so it was a compliment to call Valerie Jarrett.
That character was prettier than Valerie Jarrett.
I prefer the original 1969 Planet of the Apes.
But anyway, I mean, the assumptions that are made also, since when exactly, I mean, you know, so many assumptions are being made that since what black equals looking like an ape, I'm sorry.
Like, it's just too many presumptions.
It was just like they were trying to fire her.
Other people are saying it was staged.
Yeah, it's fascinating.
I don't know.
There's a weird thing.
You know, the fracturing lunar, you just don't know what anything.
I have to just chirp in here and say that there's such a double standard because the Cosby show is still on TV.
I checked it in reruns, and he is a convicted felon, serial rapist.
Exactly.
And ABC has a show also that stars convicted pedophiles, and it's on TV now.
And I'm forgetting the name.
You know, I read too much stuff, my poor brain.
Right, right.
But you think under Smallville with the whole cult, the Smallville actress got cut up in that scandal.
Oh, the Nexium cult.
Absolutely, yeah.
And that is, let me tell you, there's a lot of those because we know there's a lot of multi level marketing things that go on.
And we've seen those cults, they operate in these small ways.
And we've seen them even in the New Age front, and a lot of them get outed as well.
So we see that really.
It's the kind of thing that people really need to be aware of, I think.
Yeah, this selective censorship is terrifying, it sends a chill.
Send a child to me because really, I mean, some people, what I thought was great was that Diamond and Silk got on Fox and said, She's not a racist.
She's a comedian and she's popping the same stuff that other comedians do, which is not nice and they shouldn't do it.
And you should check out the comments section on our websites and on our YouTube.
Well, this is the thing it's controlling the paradigm that's in the culture because that's Stephen Colbert, right?
Deep State Legal Elimination Efforts00:15:14
Everything is anti-Strike.
I was talking about propaganda comedy back in 2016, remember?
Propaganda comedy.
That's the term right there.
Yeah.
And they have to set it up that way.
Okay, Olivia Europe.
Victrola13 says, How is the phony Skunk Works disclosure rollout having an impact on the true disclosure movement?
Is it a giant fail?
Well, you're talking about TTSA there.
And I'll tell you where they're failing is they rolled out DeLong, who was a terrible spokesman.
Now they've withdrawn him and they've kind of run around with, Elizondo, but it seems to me that one of the kind of realizations that's been happening, and Grant Cameron caught on to this, which is that they've actually bypassed the UFO community on this, and they're trying to go to Congress because they want funding for this.
And their way of doing that is by going through the media with their assets.
The problem with the whole TTSA, Skunk Works, CIA op around UFOs is that it came out of the Clinton administration idea that there was going to be a Clinton administration.
That didn't happen.
So now you have this kind of freaky leftover.
And they're still trying to roll it out anyway.
It's kind of like the Bay of Pigs.
And, you know, so you have the Trump situation just kind of looking at that.
They're not doing anything to aid it.
And you have this kind of weird leftover op of these CIA groups thinking they can do things because the CIA, with its own Air Force and with all their assets planted in the media, think that they can run the entire country.
And this is the nature of the problem that we're talking about when we get around these issues.
I mean, when we're talking about what we started with tonight, which is the RFK assassination, who do we think is behind that?
You know, obviously that's a deep state CIA operation.
So you get into major kind of issues when you're dealing with.
Whenever the CIA gets around the UFO file, it has to be rejected outright.
And you can't have people who are kind of in that world, in the new age or UFO world, chumming up to the CIA, especially after they spent so many years telling everybody how bad the CIA was for blocking all that stuff.
So, yeah.
All right.
Isaiah wants to know how do we take over the Federal Reserve?
You don't.
It's literally, it's such a force, so powerful.
Is behind that.
It is the choke point for everybody on the planet.
And I'm not saying that it will be there forever, but it's going to take a lot to dislodge that.
It's been around for this sort of group that I've heard.
They're basically centered in Basel, Switzerland.
It's a committee.
They're called the committee.
At the very top, there are 30 guys, and then maybe 10 at the very, very top.
It's very hierarchical.
You've heard of the John Coleman book, actually, described it very well.
It's called The Committee of 300.
And he wrote that back in the 90s.
He's no longer with us.
But so much of what he wrote, I read this, I need to find it in my piles of books.
But yeah, so much of what he said is really bearing out right now in the relationship of the crown to all this stuff as well.
Yeah, you're very hot on the crown.
Yeah.
You're really getting the UK.
Just like the mind control of the UK is really.
Present for me right now.
I just see it so much.
I see that they're even more controlled and manipulated than we are, if that's even possible.
I've had people really reach out to me from the UK and tell me, you have a sweet deal in America.
We're really under control here.
That's kind of fascinating to think about.
Okay, Olivia, you're up.
John Barnwell says, Did you know Lockheed Martin is a UK company with a queen holding the golden share?
Well, it's interesting.
You know, it's fascinating about Lockheed.
Because they have various interests.
So, you know, you can take shares in it.
But as far as Lockheed goes, Lockheed tracking back, even through the RFK assassination that we started with, Caesar, who was the most likely candidate for shooting Kennedy, was a Lockheed employee.
We've gone through the fact that Lockheed was deeply involved in the X series of X planes, and now they have a virtual lock.
On aerospace, along with Boeing.
So, Lockheed, there's a reason why Fitz calls Lockheed the United States of Lockheed.
And then it goes right back to the crown, like John is saying.
Let John ask any question he wants.
He's all over this topic that we're, this thing about the crown that I've been talking about.
Yes.
Okay.
Keep rolling.
So, John Kay says Didn't the House Assassinations Committee investigate the RFK murder also?
What did it conclude?
They didn't.
They investigated the MLK and JFK.
Assassination cases.
They felt that the LAPD had done their job.
The LAPD completely whitewashed the RFK assassination, and they got away with it because he was a senator.
And there's a different kind of effort that's required on the part of the deep state, as I pointed out earlier, which is when you're eliminating a president, you have to take, there's a lot of legal things that are involved.
It's a much bigger operation.
You have to replace him, you have to do all these things.
With a senator, You can assign it to local control.
You can say the deep state can handle it on the assassin side, and then you can cover it up through the police department.
It's an easier thing to do because this isn't someone who's actually sitting in the highest office in the land.
That demand for an investigation, which is there, doesn't have the same power as you have when it's a president because you have all these different offices that are affected by it.
So it's pretty fascinating because the way I look at it is.
You know, the RFK assassination was completely whitewashed.
And even the committees that have gone into it, when they've looked at the deep state operations and the CIA operations around assassination, they never have touched the RFK assassination.
And really, the information that's come out through people like William Pepper and Lisa Pease, you know, I mean, those are the researchers that have done the kind of yeoman's work on this.
I watched a documentary from 1976.
That had more information around it that's never been refuted.
So, you know, this is the nature of the thing.
The information is there, but the public will forcing the pressure, you know, just like the JFK movie forced the assassination record review board.
This is the nature of the thing.
That's where the power lies.
Yeah.
Okay.
Which is why you have like Obama and Michelle signing a $50 million deal with Netflix.
How did that pop into your mind?
I know.
Jeez.
You gotta control the entertainment industry.
It's just.
It's like propaganda.
Isn't that literally like selling yourself?
I mean, it's the Obamas, you know, like.
Not only that, he is.
I mean, he's a propaganda guy.
He's like a third generation CIA guy.
He's not even.
He is like the whatever.
It's all very convoluted.
Obama was a real creation.
Yeah.
It's really fascinating.
One of my subscribers said he was helicoptered in.
Right, exactly.
Well, what's fascinating, we should say this about Obama just to give someone perspective that.
It's not an anti-Democrat thing because, as we know, you voted most of your life as a Democrat.
But Obama was rolled in after.
I cried when he won.
Yeah, there you go.
Well, that was the mood of the country.
And I understand all that.
But the thing is, he had actually only won his Senate seat and started to serve in 2006.
Yeah.
So, and if you think about it, he started running for president.
In 2007.
So he had a year in that.
It's ridiculous.
A year like in a place where he and Valerie Jarrett were slumlords, like in the toughest, hardest, you know, like down on its teeth district in Chicago.
Right.
And like, I don't know, I just saw a video of this just horrifying housing development that maybe it was Michelle and Jarrett owned together.
I think Obama had the best chance of any president in modern times to reshape things because of the mandate he came in with.
And He completely killed over and became a clerk for the bankers.
I don't see it.
He only ever was that.
I think the thing was.
Right, no, he was.
I don't think he's ever hopey changing.
It was just a very kind of cynical, racial thing, like first black president.
But it's kind of like, you know, that's like the new thing.
I think that the deep state has sort of relocated to the Democrat Party.
No question.
They know what the demographics are.
I mean, the United States is becoming a brown country.
And so they can't have old white guys telling you what to do anymore.
It has to be people that look like your demographics.
So.
So that's why you see it's just weird that you have these strident people on TV, and like half the Democrat candidates are all CIA agents.
That is the point.
And we're going to get into that.
Before we go into that, give us that.
This is brilliant.
Okay.
Plays Live says Is the Obama thing some narrative symmetry?
A president becoming a reality star to soothe the gaping mind wound of the reality star who's become the president?
I love it.
Yeah, we can't add to that.
Can't follow that one.
So, getting to that, because you just reminded me about this, the Democrats decided to field all these new candidates.
It was something very interesting they all had in common.
What was going on there?
Right.
Well, instead of people hiding the fact that they were CIA agents, they're just being public about it now.
Absolutely incredible.
And it's just like, I'm a former CIA agent and I'm going to be a congressional star Democrat.
So, you know, they've just given over to the CIA, which is fascinating because, you know, the Democrats have a very interesting background.
And both the parties are just so corrupt that the need for a new party is overwhelming.
But I will say this, and it's something I got into with Fitz, which is that the Bernie Sanders Democrats had the same kind of dedication as the people who got Trump into office.
And I think that those groups could work together.
Oh, I heard something crazy today that Hillary and Bernie are going to run together.
Like, run in their wheelchairs and people.
Wow, that is ridiculous.
I did hear rumblings that Sanders was going to run, which is incredible.
I mean, he's already 76, he's going to be what 78?
It's ridiculous.
We've never had a president that old.
The oldest president was Reagan, and when he got his second term, he was 73.
So he was in there until he was 77.
So we got Trump at 70.
That's up there enough as it is.
And one of the things, you know, the presidency.
Hillary's the same age.
She's like a year younger or something.
Right, right.
No, she's definitely up there.
And I don't think anyone, first of all, she can't handle it legally.
If anyone takes another look, her whole scene is going to completely crumble.
Because when you look at the Clintons, you know, it's, you know, the corruption runs so deep that just a little more examination and they're bust.
Well, except for that everyone who's doing the examining is in on it, is involved on some level, is black.
No question.
No question.
And that whole thing with the phony Mueller probe, you know, we're still seeing them waste money on that and hope against hope they can get something going.
It's ridiculous.
I mean, it's a total waste of money from the start.
Mueller was the director of the CIA during 9 11.
The FBI.
I'm sorry.
That's what I meant to say.
And he actually stayed longer than you're allowed to stay.
Like Obama signed something.
Right.
He was in there for like 12 or 13 years.
He was, he actually.
Said it was okay for the NSA to keep the spying program going.
So, I mean, he's just been there covering up 9 11 and allowing the NSA to spy the way they are.
He's just a bad guy.
Yeah.
Terrible.
Yeah.
Completely anti American.
Well, I think basically the idea was the deep state, the intelligence agencies wanted to remove Trump.
That's what was going on there.
They just wanted him out any way, shape, or form because they couldn't predict him.
He was an animal that they couldn't get a handle on.
And whether you like Trump or not, we don't want somebody to come in from the CIA and tell you to take out a duly elected president.
So that's the point.
I think when we look at it, we're seeing the intelligence agencies run wild trying to do these things.
Now that they've failed in the first year and a half to do this, I wonder where they're going with the Mueller probe.
I really do.
I think that basically we're talking about it's a fight of sovereignty against globalism.
Yes.
And what we have in the intelligence agency in the Robert Mueller's of the world is infected with globalists who are anti American.
Well, the Davos crowd, right?
They look at the North American zone.
We were just a corporate business zone for them.
And so they've got their Asian zone all set up.
They're working on the European Union.
And somewhere in the middle of all that, they ran into some problems, basically.
And they ran into Trump and they ran into nationalism.
But really, their main problem is that they want to run things as this corporate overlord deal and run these different zones and forget about constitutions and all the rest of it.
So we see all these moves towards constitutional conventions and all the rest of it.
The creation of the world, the one party, uniparty, technocracy thing.
And apparently, it's starting to fall apart in Europe with the Italian pension, whatever, the various funds there are melting down.
Royal Family Nationalism Trump Clash00:03:04
Like crazy.
Yeah.
Spain and other countries are not far behind.
Fascinating.
Olivia, you're.
Aaron Moon wants to know if you have any thoughts on how Breitbart died after having dinner with Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn, who are also good friends with the Obamas.
Wow.
Incredible.
I think what I heard is, you know, he had what, a heart attack, right?
He was 46.
Not even, he was 43, I think.
He was young.
And he had, I think, one drink, two, maybe, in his system.
It's easy to get rid of people if they have the will on the side of the deep state.
The thing about Breitbart is, I do think that they saw, and you can see the threat came to full fruition by the time the 2016 election came about because the force and the power of moving that whole thing into the voting system and really getting real news out there and all the rest of it.
And Breitbart might skew one way or another, but the thing is, they were outside of the mainstream control of the news.
And I think they saw him as a pretty major threat.
Yeah, I mean, he was the one who made a claim about he called John Podesta a cover-upper of pedophilia rings.
Wow.
He tweeted about that.
He started down that road, and we got so much on the Podesta thing.
Ancient Aliens featured Podesta, and it was such a tin ear.
It's fascinating.
The recent episodes.
Right, it's incredible.
Everything they touch is just fake.
Wild, it's really, yeah.
What the hell?
It's become such a kind of a freak show from what it was.
It's just amazing, but it was so amazing the ambush of comments against Podesta when they put that out.
It was, people are just, they just don't know their audience.
I think that's fascinating.
Okay, what else you got?
Najat Mandri says, please ask Alexander the symbolism of the royal wedding.
Was that the marriage of the US to the UK?
Possibly.
I didn't watch it, you know.
I must try somehow.
Okay, I have a follow up question.
Roha Khan says, can you ask Alexander what it would take for people to realize the truth about the Windsor, quote, royal family and its corruption?
Well, it's kind of in the works.
I mean, it's definitely out there.
I think Harry's, what I have heard about Harry's thing is that the super bloodliners, you know, the real Nazis, because, you know, a lot of the Windsors are Nazis, or, you know, Prince Philip is, are totally upset that he's married, you know, a biracial woman.
Oh, that's interesting, yeah.
But I think on the other hand, it's very much his choice of Markle for a wife.
It's very much what Britain is rolling out.
Breakaway Civilization Dover Connection00:12:27
They're trying to reinvent itself as a brown country.
I don't know if you saw the thing with Cheddar Man.
They claimed that he was black, and then they had to kind of roll it back and say, no, he was olive skin.
But they had some people make one of those wax things off of the fossil.
Yes.
But they made him with blue eyes and Ethiopian skin.
And actually, there is a gene, and not all Africans have it.
Only certain groups have it.
To have that really, really dark skin is a particular gene, and that fossil did not have that gene.
So they're trying to brainwash.
It's very strange.
I think it's fine that there are people of all races living everywhere.
I don't have a problem with that.
What I have a problem with is just trying to erase the white people.
They never have it.
Well, it's fascinating.
One of the things I was going to ask you, and With all the stuff that you do riding these waves and following these stories and keeping up in so many different areas, and like if somebody goes to forbiddenknowledgetv.net, you're going to find information on politics, you'll find information on chemtrails, on organic farming, on psychic material.
I mean, you know, you cover that range, and uh, you know, we cover a lot of things with dark journalists, it's more than just that narrow corridor.
But one of the fascinating things I've been seeing is the rise and fall of certain issues and the way that they get pushed, and then they're They withdraw them and push them back out.
And one of them is Antarctica.
And I find this really fascinating.
Is that a natural, organic ebb and flow around information?
Or do you think that's kind of a controlled rollout of stuff?
It's a good question.
I think that the way things work, or that it's kind of like what you were saying about Las Vegas and why nobody's covering it in the alt media.
Okay, in the mainstream media, it could just be that the CIA has.
Either threatened or paid them not to cover it, right?
But in the uncontrolled media, it could be that, okay, that's just not hot anymore and I need clicks or something.
And nobody cares about Las Vegas in a world, you know, post I don't know how many mass shootings since, you know?
Okay, so you do kind of see it as an organic type of development.
Yeah.
I think that not that this natural organic process might not be exploitable.
Okay.
Yeah, there's no question we've seen that.
I just think that when certain groups pour on the heat and the money, like Gaia TV, for example, suddenly, you know, they push everything about alien mummies or Antarctica.
And then when that money withdraws, all the coverage withdraws.
And it's like, oh, it was an illusion to start with, you know.
But I find those trends fascinating because Flat Earth being one of the big disinformation ones.
Well, I think that, in fact, that was something that my deep throat told me that that actually was.
A real psychological operation that was tested not on the internet, it was tested decades before the internet existed, like in the 1960s or 70s.
And I'm forgetting the details, but they got some, you know, well educated professional people so convinced with these arguments that the earth was flat that it caused exactly the same kind of fractures and weirdness that we're seeing on the internet.
Wow.
And so they just rolled it out again and did it, you know, did it online this time.
They know how to control the thing.
What's the biggest risk, you think, going forward for the rest of 2018?
Do you think it's false flag activity?
Well, I think that the biggest risk has to do with whatever the Bush Clinton axis doing something absolutely crazy to cover their tracks and their assets, their criminal timeline, you know, whatever it takes.
And that's kind of what was going on with 9 11.
Yes.
And so, something, you know, if apparently they don't have control of the military, they have control of the media, clearly.
Yeah.
Yeah, they're still there.
I think that they represent the biggest danger to the world, to America, certainly, right now.
That group of people and how they're manipulating us against each other, they're very dangerous.
If they get back into full power, that is, if they get the Oval Office back.
The elections, these Democrats are not doing well in these elections.
You know, I don't really say this with glee.
It's a little weird, you know.
I know, voting against the Democrats, right?
Yeah, I've only, you know, because to me, the Democrats represented basically their anti corporatocracy, anti corporate.
It's about workers' rights.
That's what it has been in America.
But what you see Silicon Valley being about.
Which is totally allied with the Democrats is that that's total corporatism and censorship and really like warmongering with Russia.
Yes.
So, oh my God.
Democrats morph into that.
Like, who are they?
They're not, you can't call that leftist.
Those are fascists.
No question.
No question.
They became the very thing they purported to hate, which is, I think, fascinating.
Yeah.
Olivia Europe.
David Tormina is asking, how can the listeners up their game in the face of this madness?
By watching Forbidden Knowledge TV and Dark Journalist, I've taken it upon myself to try to do it.
It's a lot of work.
It's backbreaking.
It's soul crushing.
It can be depressing as hell.
It takes a lot of time.
Good point.
And you alienate yourself from normal people.
Normal people think you're bonkers.
So it sucks, actually, in a lot of ways.
But I think you're great.
That kind of thing.
One of the things I want to do right here, since.
That was a great question, actually.
Why don't we each list a couple of websites that people can get good information on?
I mentioned forbiddenknowledgetv.net, which is your site.
I actually highly recommend people sign up there for the newsletter.
You want to go there and get that in your inbox.
So that's part of your routine of getting that information going because Alexander really does a great job with that.
And sign up for the Dark Journalist newsletter because you'll know when the shows are on and what's coming up and stay informed.
And that's a way for us to get around a lot of those social media platforms too, if we need to, that direct communication.
That's the way to do it.
I always rattle off Solari.com.
That's Catherine Austin Fitzsite.
Incredible information there.
GizaDeathStar.com.
Joseph Farrell is coming on the show later this month.
Cryptagon is another one that I highly recommend.
Always interesting stories on there.
But do you want to reel off a couple?
I haven't been there in a while.
Right now, I really want to tell everyone to go to AimFor the number four, aimfortruth.org, patriotsfortruth.org.
Org or com, I'm not sure, and truthbits.com.
These are, it's all sort of loosely affiliated.
It's like 20 plus people researching with stuff that is actually very well vetted and, like, with, as they call it, impeachable evidence.
Yeah, those are good.
It's fun for retired people who were in the government who are really pissed off of what's happening.
Do you have other sites you want to mention?
That's it for now.
These are some new things that are on my radar that I really want.
To push out there.
I want to ask Alexandra what she does to escape from all of this and give herself a break.
Alexandra, how do you get away from it all, Calgon?
Unfortunately, no.
And I do need, I haven't had a day off in years now.
And it needs something that's got to give.
Because, you know, before, I mean, I actually made a decent living at this because I made a lot of advertising money from AdSense, which is Google's ad platform.
But now I literally don't even make.
$200 from Google Ads a month.
Literally, like 100, not even 100 sometimes.
It's really insane because it used to be a lot more than that.
You, well, you know, Netflix should take some of that $50 million and invest it.
You'd make some very fascinating documentaries.
What else you got?
Ben Dover wants to know who is at the very top of the food chain in the breakaway civilization?
Wait, let me go back on this name for a minute.
Is it?
Ben Dover or Bent Over?
Is that the Dave?
It's Ben Dover.
Ben Dover.
That was pretty good.
Okay, now we know.
So give me the question again.
Who's at the very top of the breakaway civilization?
No, if you knew that, then they'd eliminate you.
No, I would say what you can definitely say is that the aerospace companies are the biggest clue.
When we go through the people who've gone up against it, we can take clues from the work that they've done.
Jim Garrison, we did a show on him.
In the X series last week was so well received because so many people didn't know about him and his effort.
You know, people who've gone out there and tangled with it, you get a sense for it.
That's why I think Fitz is so important because she's been there, she's taken the heat, and you get a feel for how they try to knock those people out, the Kennedys, certainly.
So, who do we see over and over again show up in those circles?
And it really involves what Professor Scott calls the deep state, you know.
But really, if you look at these different areas, we're talking about military contractors.
And now, in particular, with the space fence getting hoisted into full capacity, now we're really talking about the aerospace companies.
So I think that's where you want to look to get signals for that.
Where would you look?
I would look at the.
The banks.
The Bank for International Settlement people.
The IS.
Yeah.
Well, not the public ones, the ones that you don't hear about, the committee, who are actually pulling the purse strings of all those endeavors.
I think it's, yeah.
Breakaway civilization in particular means something that term, although it's not used so much anymore, the idea of the breakaway civilization is pretty clear, which is that there's a group that has advanced technology.
That's either recovered from advanced craft or was a long term program, for example.
So, the breakaway civilization is that corner having to do with the tech, in my opinion, based on the way it's been brought out.
So, I think if you want the answers there, you're going to have to find who has the industry available and who has the money available.
So, you saying the banks and me saying the aerospace companies, you bring those two together, it's a pretty powerful force, especially since it looks like everything's going into space.
Well, there's also this, you know, okay, there's a nightmare scenario.
I don't know how true it is, but it doesn't really look so good.
The whole 5G rollout.
Yes.
Oh, that's absolute, yeah.
Well, basically, what I'm hearing is that it's involved with everything that we've been talking about.
It is necessary to have that kind of, that level of granularity in the net for the Internet of Things, for cryptocurrencies to be everywhere.
Dopamine Reward 5G Technology Hook00:03:07
And, um, Well, and maybe for some eugenics.
Right.
Well, which would work, you know, this is what the apparent, allegedly, the breakaway civilization would like to see is to sort of get rid of the riffraff.
Well, what are they moving toward?
They're moving toward a transhumanist future.
They're moving towards automation.
They're moving towards an androgyne, really.
They're trying to remove the genders.
So, you know, I understand it from looking at it my way, where they're headed.
But how do you see that?
Like, they're removing all these different types of labels that people have, traditions, backgrounds.
They're trying to make them non persons.
Well, I think part of that, it's part of the very classic Marxist thing, too.
It's about hope and change.
So you have to change things.
So, to change things, you have to destroy what is.
You know, right now they're destroying the basic assumptions we have about gender and things like that and sexuality or whatever.
Well, just outside the box for a second, and I know that you really know how to get into these things.
When you see them, when you see people hooked on the 4G technology, and some people, it's hard to break them out of the trance when they're looking at it.
When they get to 5G, that's a level where their brains start to merge kind of with the technology.
That's kind of where they're going.
Yeah, there's actually on many fronts in modern society.
It's the dopamine reward cycle in the brain.
You see this in the obesity epidemic.
You know, the number one killer of Western people is the Western diet, which causes heart disease and early death.
We're eating ourselves to death.
And you see, you know, this incredible opioid epidemic that's happening right now, and then the addiction to the cell phone.
It's like we're there.
I think that we need to take a step back and understand the opiate.
Dopamine reward system and understand it because it's our receptors are getting shattered by this situation, and we have basically addiction crises on all kinds of fronts.
And basically, it's a horrible, vicious cycle that the more you do it, the less happy you become.
Because it's basically the way dopamine works versus serotonin, they're like oppositional chemicals, and serotonin is that whole cycle.
Is the one that's really about sort of long term happiness and delaying gratification and having it, you know, just not overloading your opium receptors and your dopamine receptors, which is the same thing.
Serotonin Happiness Vicious Cycle00:15:51
Fascinating.
You need to be educated about that because it's just, it's everywhere.
It's, you know, it's in the food, it's everywhere you go, it's like something is trying to addict you.
That's, businesses are preying on this.
This basic neurological sort of fact that exists within us, Olivia.
I told you they were putting that in the ice cream, that's why you're so hooked.
Now we know.
Um, no, I absolutely agree, and it's interesting because it's making the whole culture into you know they've been able to control it, and we've seen that whole explosion in the pharmaceuticals since the 1990s.
People just weren't like that before, they didn't need all those things.
Suddenly, you need all these coping devices, right?
Or they didn't eat, you know, when we were kids, people were skinny, now they're everyone's fat now, right.
And then you know that the English addicted all of China in order to take over.
I mean, that's what's happening here.
We're being taken over.
I do find it fascinating that areas like Maine, for example, which has been largely rural and largely untouched by this, suddenly within the last three years has an incredible heroin epidemic.
And we've seen all these deaths in that part of New England, which just weren't there before.
And that's the black budget moving in and saying, you know what, we need to get our revenues up.
And just targeting these areas that they never used to go after before.
Right.
It's Maine, New Hampshire, West Virginia.
I mean, it's everywhere, but the incredible, you know, the severity of the epidemic in those states is completely off the charts.
It's very disturbing.
Olivia.
So, Bea Robinson asks Where does Alexander think Trump stands?
Just another frontman?
Stands on what?
Yeah, that's a good question.
Let's say, generally, Do you think that Trump represents just another front man like we've had as other presidents?
Like Obama?
No.
I think, as we were saying before, he's a nationalist, not a globalist.
Yeah, that's a big switch.
That's a big switch.
And I would say, no matter what someone thinks of Trump and his politics, it's a breakthrough to break through that corporate.
Oh, yeah.
Do I like him?
Do I like his hair?
No, of course not.
Do I like the fact that he's giving the Dip State a run for their money?
I love that.
That's great.
That's it.
You met Donald Trump.
I didn't exactly meet him years ago at Moomba, which was a very trendy nightclub in Greenwich Village.
Okay.
Back, you know, decades ago, I was out with my brother and a bunch of friends who were all at Calvin Klein, including with Carolyn Bissett, who was with me.
Right.
I want to ask you a question about her, too, sir.
And so it was like 3 o'clock in the morning.
This was like the after, after, after, you know, party thing.
And he was there with.
With Bruce Willis.
And they were definitely on the prowl.
They were out hoeing, as it's called.
And like they were leering at us, and we were just like, these cheesy bastards, like, look at that guy's hair.
Oh my God.
You know, like the same way that you hear people talking about his orangeness and the, you know, he looks like a giant Cheeto or whatever.
Like, this is the kind of thing we were saying back then.
And, you know, it was just kind of hilarious.
To see Donald Trump at three o'clock in the morning.
Here's one thing I will say in answer to that.
That is a fascinating experience, let's face it.
One thing I will say on the Trump thing is Trump made it so that Hillary Clinton could not occupy the White House.
So let's hear a round of applause for that.
Okay, what else?
David Donaway is asking Will Trump cause 9 11 to be reinvestigated as he suggested in 2016?
He came out with a lot of things during the campaign that were absolutely fascinating.
What I've heard is that he's not going to touch it.
Because I think that this, the financial thing is more important.
That's what I asked that question today from my source, and he said he's not going to touch it.
That's interesting.
He campaigned on it.
He campaigned on it.
He did.
We have to think once you get in office, this is the thing how much transparency do you want?
But what I find fascinating is we already have with the JFK records and Trump a problem.
So the idea of thinking he would unravel 9 11 doesn't seem quite likely.
It seems like even if he has inclinations to go in that direction, and he's indicated that he has, and even in my, you know, we've had Roger Stone on the program, and if you follow things that Roger Stone says, Trump certainly knows a lot about a great deal of these issues.
He's very much more on this side of the page with the alternative media, for sure.
But at the same time, they have introduced this idea of Trump as a savior in certain circles, and that even when he bombs Syria, it's all 4D chess, and that's all nonsense.
We don't have to take Trump.
On at that to see him as for what he is, you know, to see the benefit of the Trump administration versus what would have been the Clinton, you know, Cold War.
Services like here, I'm doing it.
And then he just kind of turns around and stops it.
It's kind of interesting, you know.
It is.
It's not very convenient.
I love it if he fires Bolton after sucking his brain dry.
That'll be fabulous.
I'm hoping so.
I like your vibe on that.
But here's what I'm saying my prediction is if, and I mean if, and I certainly hope not, but if Trump.
Goes after Iran, it's all over.
Change, legacy, all the rest of it.
It'll be history.
So if you listen to those neocons and your President Trump, they're going to get you into the same trap that they got other presidents into.
Don't go for it.
Right, right.
That's my take on that.
Okay, what else you got?
So Ronnie Returns asks Would RFK have opened up an investigation on JFK if he had been elected to office?
I'm glad you mentioned that.
Three weeks before he was assassinated, he was asked that question.
And remember, he kept, although in the background, He was working quite a bit on the investigation.
He kept publicly silent as the Kennedys have until RFK Jr.
But three weeks before, he was at a university answering questions, and they said, Will you reopen the investigation and go beyond the Warren Commission into JFK's murder?
And he said that he would.
So that was another reason where they were thinking, This is it.
If he gets in, it's all over for us.
But they knew that anyway.
He saw RFK, and the reason we're looking back at him 50 years later, the potential of the presidency he was going to have would have brought us that transparency back.
Then.
So, you know, Watergate, Iran Contra 9 11, that whole kind of setup that we had afterwards, it would have been such a blow to the deep state to have pulled out of Vietnam in 1968 instead of waiting till 1973.
That's five years of drug profits, military profits, and all the rest of it.
So they got fat on that.
I do feel that RFK understood.
And there's an interesting thing that came up there because, you know, he had done a number of things to expose the Garrison investigation and block it.
And everyone always found that very unusual because, of course, Jim Garrison was trying to bring the CIA in.
But he was afraid that if all these things came out, the CIA would try to use it against the Kennedy legacy, basically, and say, well, actually, it was Kennedy who ordered those assassinations of Castro and all the rest of it.
So what he was doing at the end, however, was exchanging letters with Garrison where they had come to some kind of thing where he understood that he tried to block the Garrison investigation.
He had these letters with Garrison, and Garrison said, You know, you have got to come forward about the JFK issue because it's only by exposing it that you can keep those bullets off of your cell.
And RFK wrote him back and said, I understand that there's a number of guns between me and the White House.
So RFK understood the deep state's position, and he went forward bravely in any case.
So that's something to keep in mind.
But yeah, I think that gives you a pretty good answer, which is that three weeks before he was assassinated, He said it himself.
We don't even have to speculate.
He said, I'm going to reopen the investigation into JFK's assassination.
David Donaway is also asking Are there still hidden files on this case that have yet to be opened?
Oh, yeah, on the RFK and the JFK side.
Absolutely.
There's so much information about the players around.
First of all, they locked up all of the information as we started off the program with, with the photography of.
This Enyart photographer who took all these pictures of the assassination as it happened.
And on the JFK side, they locked up the Garrison files.
What does that tell you?
Who was Garrison looking into?
He was looking into the aerospace companies.
Why am I doing an X series?
Well, you have your answer.
So it is fascinating.
And it's a good question, though, because a lot of people just say, well, you know, their files, they're not going to leave anything in there that's important.
Oddly enough, although there won't be smoking guns in the files that they hold back, there are things in there which can help researchers.
Connect those dots.
And that's what they've been the most afraid of, especially if they let out the Garrison files, because his full blown investigation into the aerospace companies, which is where he thought the assassination resided, runs the risk of blowing the whole thing open before they get the space fence operational.
So, you know, I mean, we're looking at some heavy duty stuff.
I would say that it looks bad on the JFK side when Trump, on the 26th of April, Didn't keep his promise from October 26, which was that the CIA has six months to release these records.
And he gave them until 2021, which is a year after the election.
You know, that's not a good sign in terms of getting access to.
Like I said, what I'm being told, and we'll see if it's true, is that they will come out when Bush Sr. dies, which will be very soon.
Yeah, I got to tell you, I'm going to go on the record thinking that's a no go because Bush Sr., the only reason they would keep those records is they didn't want to humiliate a president.
But if W is alive and he's his son, they're not going to let them out.
So that's a tricky one, but hey, listen, I'm wide open.
I would love those records to come out.
And I think that there might be some momentum going on here that we're looking at, seeing as Bobby Kennedy's son is asking for an investigation.
I think you're right.
He knew all along that this is what was going on, but the fact that he would come out and say it, Kennedy has never said that since the assassinations took place.
But you knew Carolyn Bissett, and she told you.
Yeah.
Well, I knew Max and I knew I was neighbors with Rory, who were both RFK's children.
And I knew John from college.
I knew him over the years.
He dated people I grew up with, like Daryl Hannah.
And then I knew Carolyn from various.
It was, you know, the world is small, what can I say?
And he never, no Kennedy that I knew ever discussed the assassination of their fathers.
Right.
But Carolyn did say that she did intimate to me that he absolutely thought there was a conspiracy to kill his father within the government.
But it was kind of, she didn't really spell it out because I think she was trying to be, you know, faithful to him.
I've heard that he was absolutely obsessed with bringing it out and that the magazine was an avenue for that.
Right.
That's what she said he was obsessed with it.
I think it's interesting that you were friends with John Jr. in college.
It's like an interesting path.
I met him before.
I met him when I was 12.
Right.
Yeah.
It's so, I mean, it's interesting with you.
Do you have your Rumsfeld letter and do you want to show it?
Sure.
I would love for you to show this.
And if you know, in watching these interviews that we do and we get together and talk, we've always mentioned this thing about there's been this Rumsfeld connection because Alexandra's stepdad worked.
In a company where Rumsfeld and he was around in those circles, and he made a bet with her when she was 14 about whether or not.
What was the bet about?
It was about the easternmost, westernmost, southernmost, northernmost territories of the United States.
Of the United States.
And you had him beat, but he tricked you.
Right, exactly.
Hold on.
Well, actually, he kind of turned it around.
It was very manipulative.
Yes.
Here we go.
I'm going to have to email it from one computer to the other and then.
Oh, no, that's okay.
That's all right.
While you're doing that, Olivia, you're up.
So, is there a connection between RFK and Valiant Thor?
Somebody's asking about that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's very interesting.
It's very interesting.
Well, first of all, there's a couple of things that come into play with RFK, which is he gave the briefings to JFK on the UFO file, and he was very on top of it because this was his gig being on top of these things for JFK and their developments.
And one of the things that we have from Philip Corso is that he was briefing RFK directly to give the information on the UFO file to JFK.
So we know that on the record from Corso.
That's one.
But there's a guy named Frank Stranges who is a minister who wrote a book about Valiant Thor and meeting him at the Pentagon and how he was, you know, it was the Nixon as VP and Eisenhower who were hosting this extraterrestrial there who had shown up and said, you know, I want to help you.
So it is a fantastic story, no question.
However, a really interesting detail came up later, which is that his house was basically raided at one point, and that Bobby Kennedy came in with a number of his investigators and says something along the lines of, Okay, tell me all about your spaceman.
And so I'll tell you what's interesting about Stranges and his tale of valiant Thor, which is that there are supportive.
Anecdotes over time, if you really look at that story, maybe the fact that he's a minister also is another reason.
Now, I think people associated with it can often think that he was mind controlled and that he saw things or they told him things just to test him out, and it's possible.
Because certainly, you know, Valiant Thor is one of those urban legends in a way.
And yet, it was Alexandra's book on the Philadelphia experiment where she was talking about Phil Schneider and.
Marilyn Stranges Valiant Thor Tale00:09:41
Schneider said that he met Thor.
And we know that Schneider worked on those underground bases.
So, that his father, there's a photograph of his father, Otto Schneider, sitting next to the valiant Thor in the below decks on the Eldridge on the USSR.
Right.
Well, I saw a lecture with Schneider after that because I got curious.
And he talks about having met Thor himself and that he never aged.
Right.
Pretty interesting.
Let's face it.
No, there's something odd.
There's an odd echo in that story.
But certainly RFK showing up and getting the details.
That sounds pretty legit to me.
I don't know if this is true or not, but Ann Gummy Bear says Valiant Thor is my kitty.
Yeah, there you go.
I think it's a great name for a kitty.
What else you got?
Okay, so Christopher Newsy says Do you think that JFK Jr.'s plane crash was a deep state off?
Oh my God.
You still have me on kitty as you roll into that one.
I want to announce here that Olivia is one of the biggest fans of kitties on the planet.
Well, the deal is, you know, there's a lot.
Of what was going on when JFK Jr. was eliminated.
They were talking about him running for that Senate seat that Hillary Clinton eventually got in New York.
It made sense.
He had the connections, he had the charisma.
I think that when we look at it, there are too many unusual things with the Kennedys, starting with John's older brother being exploding in midair before he could be president.
Kennedy being taken out, JFK, RFK.
Here we are on the 50th anniversary of him being removed before he can be president.
What is it that's going on here?
So, John Jr., very likely candidate, let's face it.
And after his mother had passed away, you know, it seemed a lot more viable that, you know, he wouldn't want to break her heart by getting into it after she had to live through all this.
But after Jackie had passed away, it seemed pretty viable that this was going to happen.
And I happen to think that John Jr.'s plane crash was no accident.
I have that gut feeling as well.
I happened to be working outside, maybe, I don't know, less than 20 miles as the crow flies.
I was bartending at a tiki bar in Montauk.
That's very Alexandra.
Yeah, I was writing my first book, and so I thought, I'll be a bartender and a writer, and it'll be really easy.
I'll just get a bartending gig, and I found out that nothing could be more cutthroat and impossible than a bartending gig in the Hamptons.
But so there I was at the tiki bar at this place.
And so I saw all the helicopters freaking out like late at night.
Right.
We didn't know what was happening.
Right, right, right.
What I can tell you is that it was clear.
It was a very clear night.
So this talk about haze, I don't buy it.
I don't buy that at all.
No, I totally agree with you.
And then another interesting thing, and I don't know what to make of it.
Our mutual friend, John Kennedy, and my mutual friend, John Barlow, who passed away just a couple of months ago.
Oh, yeah.
He was a raided pilot himself, and he promoted the official story, which I found strange.
Oh, that is strange.
John had some involvement with the CIA.
Yeah.
But.
He was very close.
He liked John, he was a very important person for him.
They loved each other, they were very close.
Fascinating.
Well, John was very young, John Jr., when they took him.
And it seems to me the story around it never really held up for me.
And, you know, when you see those things happen, plane crashes are really one of the best things they like to use, let's face it.
Okay, we'll take a couple more questions and then we'll wrap it up.
Oh, and if you found your letter, I would love it.
I uploaded it onto our thing.
I don't know how else to do it.
It's not printed out, so I can't.
Ah, okay, okay.
No, we'll do it next time.
We'll do it next time.
Definitely.
Okay, David Tormina, DJ and Alex, don't you agree the karmic debt for JFK, RFK is ripe to be paid?
Well, it's the transparency that's important there.
The karma around the situation, forget it.
I mean, you have a small group of individuals really controlling the lives of so many people.
And Not playing by any ethical role.
So it's incredible to me that these people, when they take them on, can't beat them at the ballot box.
So they resort to the kind of assassinations that we've seen.
But there's no question the fundamental character of the nation was at risk with those assassinations and removing those leaders.
And any kind of transparency that we get regarding the things that they brought forward and the reason that they were eliminated.
That kind of transparency can help change the whole tone and nature of the government that we have.
That's why we need it.
As a matter of fact, any government that doesn't deal, it's just like a person.
If you don't deal with your past, then you're not going anywhere because a government that can't deal with its past, own up to it, and move forward.
The reason that in this case we haven't seen it is because too many of those people and too many of their families and too many of the groups around them benefited.
And it was basically an overthrow of the Duly elected government.
So, you know, I hope the karma has rolled around.
What do you think?
I have something to add to that.
You know, when John died, I felt something.
I was just learning about the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, about branching universes and stuff.
Yes.
Boy, did I see the universe branch at that juncture.
It was like, wow, a world where maybe John Jr. could have been the president is no longer possible.
Wow.
And going to be a very different world as a result.
Well, let's end where we started, which is that's Kennedy winning, and he was about to win the Democratic nomination and then the presidency against Nixon.
Pretty different world.
A pretty different world we would have had.
Olivia, let's take a couple more questions.
Do you want to go into Marilyn Monroe at all?
Sure, anytime.
Well, about her potential assassination.
Oh my God.
Well, what do you got?
I'm sorry, I'm looking for it.
So, Scruples 4444.
What is DJ's take on Marilyn Monroe getting killed for having too much knowledge on both the Kennedys and possibly her UFO connection?
Well, let's start with that one.
It's pretty interesting, actually, because she was friends with Dorothy Kilgallen.
Kilgallen eventually would have a mysterious death herself under similar types of circumstances of some kind of overdose nonsense.
But there's no question that what had happened, according to two FBI documents, is that JFK, during his time with Marilyn, not as a bragging thing, but maybe as kind of like subject matter, told her about witnessing a hangar where he had seen these crashed aliens.
And They were worried about her as a loose cannon anyway, but the fact that she might reveal that could have very well played a major role in her death.
Alexandra?
I'm having a.
That's fascinating.
It is fascinating.
Marilyn was an incredible person, and those people, you know, they kind of gravitated to each other, JFK and Marilyn, and they are larger than life, right?
These incredible characters.
But we have to remember also that Marilyn was tracked.
Hardcore by the FBI.
She was tracked by the CIA.
The CIA and the FBI, when someone becomes a celebrity, they go right on the radar because they're like, if they go against our causes, if they go against us.
And especially in that period where the FBI was ultimately paranoid, they targeted people like Marilyn and they would use dirt against them to keep them quiet if they ever became political adversaries.
So, on the surface to us, there are celebrities and You know, whatever it happens to be.
And of course, she was a great celebrity.
But on the other hand, each of these people, once they get into that position, they have a kind of political identity.
And so they get into these situations where groups monitor them for how they can profit from them or how they can keep them in a box.
And we see a lot of that now.
As a matter of fact, we've seen a lot of, and this is something that May Brussels used to point out, a lot of interesting deaths like John Lennon's death.
Where it's, we have to look at it a much bigger picture in terms of the political ramifications and where these people stood and the kind of power they had as heroes of the people in a sense.
Bobby Kennedy Rosicrucian Connections00:10:06
So, yeah, fascinating question.
Okay, what else you got?
Daniel Natal says, please ask Daniel and Alexandra about politicians keeping security clearances after retiring and doing insider trading for companies that hire them afterward, Five Eyes, Echelon, et cetera.
Is Daniel Natal the one who writes the music?
Yes, he is.
Wow.
Yeah, we've heard that, and it's very sometimes very witty and it's interesting stuff.
So thank you.
Yeah, well, I just heard that Valerie Jarrett still has her security clearance, and she's the only one living at the bunker in D.C., the house that the U.S. taxpayer is paying $5 million a year to house the Obama family.
They haven't set foot in the place, and she's living there instead with more security than anything.
She gets the briefing every day from the CIA, and she still has security clearance.
What is she doing there?
Why are we paying for this?
Well, excellent point.
We have a question up there.
Jane Jones, any catcher in the rye with Sirhan, Sirhan?
Absolutely fascinating question.
Of course, they use the catcher in the rye with John Lennon's assassin.
And they also use the whole Jody Foster thing when it came to the person who tried to assassinate Reagan, which is John Hinckley Jr., who was a friend of the Bush family.
And they always have these little kind of devices.
It's sort of like a signature of intelligence work.
With Sirhan, Sirhan, I'll tell you what's fascinating.
Is that the material that they found and that they linked him with, in the groups that he was linked with, were Rosicrucians and Theosophists.
Now, you know, in the X series, we've gone a deep, very deep, to show that the deep state is a symptom of the war of these mystery schools when you boil it right down to it.
And we've shown the role that Theosophy has in the Rosicrucians, certainly.
I found that fascinating because I felt like there was a lot of symbolism.
And using Sirhan that way.
And it may have been a warning to those groups that they could scandalize them.
So that would be my take on the catcher in the rye and that setup was Theosophy and the Rosicrucians.
And I'll tell you, he certainly was involved with both.
Okay, what else you got?
David Tormina again.
DJ, have you or will you ever speak with RFK Jr.?
Outlast the backlash says, Does Bobby Jr. think Sirhan was mind controlled?
Well, it's interesting.
He didn't say that.
He did come forward with his statement and say that after three hours with him, he was convinced, based on other information he had developed, that Sirhan may have been kind of railroaded and framed.
He has intimated that there was a role in mind control.
He didn't come out and say it.
But there's indications in this book that's coming out, and it's not out yet, it's supposed to hit sometime around Labor Day.
And I definitely want to get my hands on it.
In terms of contact with him, you know, I've actually made those connections behind the scenes, but I haven't talked to him personally.
Okay.
So, how many years do we have to wait for the files on RFK's assassination?
Well, they're buried.
What's interesting is they're buried under a different type of system.
Whereas, if they were a government document, that'd be easier to get at.
But the LAPD locked them down in a legal case.
So, technically, we never get them.
There are records that were involved with that case where they said we'll hold them for 20 years.
And, like I said earlier, we have Scott Enyert, who, you know, he came forward and I want to show his picture again because this showed up later, which is the shot of him.
Taking pictures of the RFK assassination at 15 as a high school reporter.
And his account was verified.
And what they did after trying to trick him with the records was say, Your stuff was stolen.
Sorry.
So, I think that the other thing is that they took the bullet samples from all the different, the ceiling and the wall and the door and all the rest of it, and then they eliminated them in 1974, saying they were taking up space.
So, they wanted to bury this case.
So, it's not on a good track the way that the JFK stuff is supposedly on a good track because you have rolling releases of material.
In this case, in the Bobby Kennedy case, what RFK Jr. is calling for. Is a new investigation, and that would have the ability to open up a lot of those records.
As it stands, they're not scheduled to ever be shown.
It's a breakthrough thing.
I can tell you from studying this for so long.
RFK Jr. coming out and saying that is a big kerrang in the middle of that establishment whitewash because they've always kept the Kennedys quiet on this.
John Kay is asking Is there any occult symbolism to the date which RFK was shot?
And Marie Oliver just asked, Is there esoteric symbolism to the location in LA?
Well, you know, it's interesting.
Yeah, because there's something about 23 that.
Yeah, I would say what's interesting about that for me, I couldn't say right off the bat the esoteric connections on it, except that they, with Sirhan, they have the Rosicrucian theosophical thing, which is that he's part of a Rosicrucian group and he has all the Blavatsky materials and all this.
So they're trying to tie him into that.
For me, that's particularly significant.
I think what they saw here, as opposed to Dallas, which was really organized, I think they saw an opportunity here with the Ambassador Hotel.
I do think it's interesting that Gene Dixon made the prediction and got it to the Kennedys about Bobby being killed in Los Angeles.
So there are trails of esoteric.
There's definitely trails of esoteric and very unusual.
There's a story, one of the most fascinating stories that comes out of this is that there was a name that was repeated over and over again in Sirhan's diaries, and it related to the Boston Strangler.
And it was in there just as much as this whole RFK must die thing, which let's take a look at that.
I mean, that's real MKUltra programming there.
And so this name that was associated with the Boston Strangler was in his diaries.
Later in 1979, there was a psychologist who analyzed the Boston Strangler and got him to come out, DeSalvo.
And he was, he had these prostitutes that he frequented, and he bragged to the prostitutes that he had programmed Sir Han.
And they, it's funny because the prostitutes shared this amongst themselves, these ladies of the evening, and they had assumed they meant that he meant, oh, after the assassination.
I programmed him.
But there was one who figured it out in the middle of all of them who was maybe smarter than the rest and said, No, don't you get it?
What he's telling us in these sessions is that what he's bragging about is that he gave him the programming in order to do the shooting.
And it's interesting when you go into this guy's history, he actually tracks back through the 60s with the CIA programs under very difficult circumstances to pin down because they destroyed so many of the MKUltra records.
But there are things along this line that hover right over the RFK case.
There's very good reason for assuming that Sirhan is a mind control Manchurian candidate because when he shows up, he doesn't remember.
And there was another, he doesn't remember shooting Kennedy.
I mean, that's pretty bizarre.
There's another interesting piece of that, and I alluded to it earlier, where when they actually took him under hypnosis, they said, What do you see when you go back there?
And he said, I see myself shooting at a target range.
So that was obviously what they implanted in his mind.
So he was kind of the decoy to just shoot like crazy at this range and then have the other person do the real shooting.
That's the kind of setup when you get into this.
This is a very deep operation, and you have to understand what's at stake for them assassinating MLK and RFK within a two month period.
I mean, they're really showing their jugular if you think about it, but they have to do it.
Just previous to MLK being killed, as we started the program off with, LBJ says, I'm not running for re election, basically resigns the presidency.
So that whole chain of events is all connected, in my opinion.
But it is, it's a fascinating story.
And I do think when we look into the roots of MKUltra, when we look into what they were trying to do with it, that Sirhan looks like the perfect candidate for it.
The other thing about Sirhan I want to mention is when we look at the programming that he got, Um, there was an incredible Columbia psychiatrist who was an expert at hypnosis, and he said that he never met a more pliable subject than Sirhan Sirhan, who he studied in prison.
MKUltra Sirhan Hypnosis Programming00:06:06
He said he could give him simple, uh, hypnotic suggestions, and he would climb the bars.
He would give him suggestions that he was a monkey or whatever, and he would climb the bars and do these things with, like, you know, two or three minutes of induction.
He was incredibly pliable, suggestible.
Mind.
So that's on the record.
Okay, so we'll take one more question.
Okay, so David Tormina again.
Alexandra, in your circle close to the Kennedys, do you feel a truth meme emerging?
Is there a truth meme emerging?
Well, we've seen RFK Jr.
I guess the answer is yes.
I think you're right on.
Alexandra, it's fantastic to have you back with us.
Wow, it's been a while.
Wow.
What have you got coming up with Forbidden Knowledge TV?
Oh, God.
I don't.
I figure it out as I go on.
I react.
I want to tell everyone to go there, ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.net, sign up for a newsletter.
Oh, my God, it's free.
If you can't imagine what an incredible service that is, you're going to get directly in your inbox the newsletter with the video and Alexander's analysis.
Absolutely priceless.
The best stuff out there.
Go to ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.net and sign up for that.
And next week, we're coming back with the X Series, part 13.
And you don't want to miss that.
It'll be Friday at 7 p.m.
I wanted to mention this to everyone who's following the X Series.
We've just crossed half a million views with the X Series.
So I appreciate the support and the understanding that people have and following because the detail is rich in the X Series.
But I think we've let out maybe about 10% of what we have on that.
So there's a lot more coming for sure.
Olivia.
Outrageously great as usual.
Thank you so much.
And we will see everyone.
Go to darkjournalist.com, sign up for the newsletter.
That's how we stay in touch back and forth with each other.
And I think that's the best way to go.
Support the site, get behind it, subscribe.
I think it's $4 a month for the information that you're going to get.
And you're going to want to be a subscriber over the summer for sure.
So thank you so much.
And Alexandra, we'll have you back real soon.
Hey, thank you.
Thank everyone for your questions.
And just every time you look at the TV, those are the people who are pushing like 19 box cutter, bearing hijackers did.
Just don't believe it.
It's horrible.
Don't watch that stuff.
Osama bin Laden's coming to get you, baby.
Yeah, they threw him overboard in accordance with Islamic principles.
I mean, don't watch that stuff.
Don't listen to them.
He was such a seafaring man, didn't you know?
What was that?
They were like, he wanted to be buried at sea.
Viking funeral.
Oh, Kim Osman.
Gee, we miss you.
Wow, great to see you.
And fascinating stuff, Alexander.
You really, I mean, the stuff you're working on, absolutely amazing.
And you look great.
You look great.
It's great to see you.
Are those real pearls everybody wants to know?
Yes, they're freshwater pearls.
They're pink.
And this is one of the businesses my mother was in.
They're called Baroque pearls because they're irregular.
Let me see if I can get them close to the camera.
Oh, those are great.
Those are fantastic.
You see, they're like irregular and they're pink.
Beautiful.
She used to go to China.
I went once with her.
It was fabulous.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Absolutely amazing.
Well, we hope you have a fantastic summer, of course, but I'll talk to you later this week.
And let's look for a great weekend for everybody.
And we'll see you next week.
Thanks, guys.
Thank you.
It's great to see you.
Olivia?
Bye, everybody.
Hey, what's for dinner?
Tequila first, then ice cream.
I think you're addicted.
I am.
It's 5G tequila addiction.
Thank you, everyone.
And a shout out to let's see who I can grab Rika, the hopeful volunteerist.
It's great to see you out there.
And Margaret Weston.
Margaret Weston.
Hopefully you're joining us.
Was she in the chat?
I didn't see her in the chat, but she subscribed today.
Yes.
Ice Angel.
It's great to see you.
David Ward.
Thank you for coming aboard.
And wow, we have a great crew tonight.
Aaron Moon, we caught you earlier.
Scruples444, fantastic.
Now it's going too fast.
My eyes are doing that thing.
Occult Fan, it's great to see you out there.
Bad Wolf, Erica McLaughlin, Najat, it's great to see you out there.
Jabberwocky, I was just reading about Jabberwocky.
We were just talking about that.
And in there to Thrice Majestic, we had the best quote last week.
Remember?
That was amazing.
We used it, we pinned.
Your quote, and that was great, thank you so much.
And uh, wait, Plays Live has a question.
Uh, what Steiner book is the most hardcore?
Outline of Occult Science, all right.
Um, Oris Lover, yeah, it's great to see you out there.
Oris Lover was a fan of the show, I'm trying to think back now, at least all the way back to 2014, so it's great to have you out there.
Of course, Daniel Natal, we touched on him, Tessa Dick, thank you, it's always great to have you out there, and um.
Bill Ferry.
Bill Ferry.
Terrific.
Our Casey connection.
Our Casey connection.
I like that.
Excellent.
And thank you for your emails and staying in touch.