Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt and Olivia expose the CIA's obstruction of JFK files, arguing President Trump's 2018 delay protects a "deep state" involving Allen Dulles, Dryhole Byrd, and aerospace contractors. They claim Lee Harvey Oswald was an undercover agent in a plot to silence JFK's anti-war stance, linking the assassination to UFO cover-ups and Project Blue Book. Liszt dismisses QAnon as a distraction, urging viewers to prioritize Peter Dale Scott's research on unconstitutional black budgets and continuity of government protocols over sensationalist memes. Ultimately, the episode asserts that withholding these records perpetuates a dangerous secrecy regime threatening democracy. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Dark Journalists Special Report00:01:58
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalists, and it's great to be here with everyone.
We have a special report tonight on the JFK assassination record release files that didn't get released because the CIA blocked it and Trump gave them the okay after they came up with a really miserable excuse, which is that they needed more time to review the places and methods involved, and that they thought it was hazardous because of the information that was in there relating to current agents.
Well, I'll tell you, the event took place 55 years ago.
So, how many current agents in the field are you going to have who were working 55 years ago during the JFK assassination that would somehow pop up in those records?
And of course, you can always fudge a name or whatever and release the documents.
So, those are really bad excuses, and it's a really terrible decision by President Trump, but very telling, I think.
And we need to get into it because I think it represents a shift on a few levels.
I want to say right off the bat, it's great to have everyone here at this special live broadcast, and I'm joined by Olivia.
Hi, everyone.
Who will be taking your questions and, of course, ask your questions all in caps so it's easier for her to sift out the best ones and we'll whip right through those in the second part of the program.
We're not going to have a guest on the show tonight because I have too much information just to lay out based on what took place today.
And we are still doing our X show tomorrow night, Friday night at 7 p.m., and that'll be X number eight.
So I'm looking forward to all of you joining us then.
A couple of things I want to get into right away, and they certainly are disturbing on a couple of levels.
And I'm going to have this ready right in front of me as I read it to you.
So just bear with me for a second.
Parallels Between Presidents00:15:42
One of the fascinating rules of working with the deep state is, you know, kind of survival.
And we have a pretty heavy duty deep state in America.
And very often, what we hear about as the deep state, whether it's from mainstream media or very often, unfortunately, in the alternative media, has nothing whatsoever to do with what the deep state is.
The deep state is a concept that was developed by Professor Peter Dale Scott, who's been on this program many times.
And it's part of his deep politics.
Which is gleaned through 40 years of research from being a Canadian diplomat working with the Americans and then teaching at UC Berkeley for four decades.
The books that he's come up with over the years have studied the JFK assassination and a number of deep events, but specifically the JFK assassination, which he calls the first deep state revolt against the White House.
And that's so important because, of course, we've always had the deep state in America, but we saw them get certain powers.
By the Cold War, so that by the 1960 election, they were in full swing.
And they thought that they had their man in, Nixon, and Kennedy surprised them all with his own connections, with their own money, and came in.
And President Kennedy, coming from Boston as he did as part of an Irish Catholic heritage, it was a very unusual choice for president at the time.
He was a real breakthrough character, and I think we forget that very often.
There were religious questions about him.
There were questions about him being too liberal.
So he had to do a lot to beef up his kind of credentials as a hardline guy when he first got in.
And, you know, when we think back to JFK and what he was trying to do and what he, the efforts that he was making, he basically had sized up the situation before he got in office.
And he had said, when we come in, we're going to do everything differently because what's happened under this administration.
Is the top level has gotten very weak and the intelligence agencies have built up too much power.
And he became particularly concerned about world conditions, which he knew well.
He was an incredibly well educated and well traveled president.
And in terms of knowing the system, he had been in Congress since 1946 and then a senator in 1952 through 1960.
So he really understood the lay of the land in Washington.
His dad was an incredible wheeler dealer on Wall Street, as we know, and made a lot of questionable alliances for sure.
But some of those things would come in handy later.
Taking on a very seedy political establishment.
And his dad became the ambassador to the UK and he worked for FDR.
And at a certain point, FDR put him in charge after the depression of the SEC.
And someone asked FDR, Why are you doing this?
You know, Joe Kennedy was one of the biggest guys who went in there and ripped up the stock market himself.
He doesn't care about the rules.
And he said, Yeah, that's why he'll be able to get the other guys who are cheating over there.
FDR definitely kept an eye on him and also wanted to contain him because he felt like he was a rising star and he didn't want a challenge from him in any of his four terms for president.
So he had pointed him to these nice positions and ambassador to the UK was one of them.
Now, Ambassador Kennedy, John's father, got into some trouble saying that he felt the fight against Hitler was hopeless because England wasn't pursuing it the right way and so on, and that he pretty much had given up.
And he thought that the fascists were going to win in the UK.
And that ruined his political aspirations.
So he set all of his aspirations to his sons.
And his older son, Joseph Jr., died during the war when he was doing a secret mission.
And there's a lot of questions, even about that, that right very early on they were targeting the Kennedys because they saw this political dynasty in the making and they didn't like where it was going because these were very independent thinkers who had their own connections and their own foundations.
And they were new money as far as it went.
They had made all this money just previous to the Great Depression with bootlegging and all sorts of business activities that the father was involved in.
So, John F. Kennedy, though, had a great ethic as far as service was concerned.
And RFK, working with him when he got in the White House, they were determined to kind of clean up the scene and put America on a totally different course.
And they saw themselves as the new frontier.
They were really going to kind of change things and make America a different place.
They felt that all the ideas had been outmoded and that everything was working off this World War II mentality.
And now it was here in the 60s.
A new revolutionary times, and they needed to kind of embrace what was going on and catch up to it to make America lead.
It's another thing we have to keep in mind about the Kennedys, they were incredibly competitive.
Now, John Kennedy got into a number of skirmishes early on with the CIA, who were trying to manipulate him as a young president and expecting that he did not have the kind of experience that he needed.
And he didn't have the ability to read through what they were talking about because.
The CIA was up to so many different things in different parts of the world, and Kennedy actually was catching them doing things and saying, You have to clear that with the president first.
So it was a completely different level of engagement as opposed to Eisenhower, who had initially trusted the CIA implicitly to do things for him, and they had done a number of things behind his back, including when he had a stroke right in the middle of his presidency there.
So during those months, That Nixon took over, a number of things were accomplished by the CIA because they had a very young Nixon on their hand who they knew how to manipulate, and Eisenhower was temporarily out of the picture and they took the most advantage of it, including moving a lot of that exotic technology files out of government hands and into corporate hands.
But we'll go into that on a different show.
But for these purposes, we have to understand that JFK was basically onto them.
And as recounted by his biographer, Arthur Schlesinger, he said, My goal is going to, after seeing all the things that the CIA was up to, and that he would send down orders and that they would disobey him, and he felt like they were just this rogue government on their own.
He said, Well, you know, what I'm going to do is I'm going to return the powers of the CIA to the military where they belong, and the CIA can do intelligence gathering.
That's it.
They're not going to be in charge of covert activity.
This is crucial.
They were never assigned to do that type of activity, and there's a weird slip of how they got into that.
And once they got into it, it seemed like they were just unstoppable.
But in any case, he said, What I'm going to do is smash the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.
So this was his attitude going in and taking on these people.
And they took note of it and they tried a number of aversion techniques to take him down in certain areas, trying to prove that he wasn't tough enough on defense, that he wasn't dealing with the Soviets tough enough.
And nothing short of a nuclear war was enough for those guys.
But they were all very financially oriented because Alan Dulles, let's remember, who was the chief of the CIA, the CIA director from 53 to 61, which is when Kennedy fired him, he came out of Wall Street.
This isn't like this guy had some great military background and they assigned him because of his great intelligence capability.
He was a Wall Street lawyer who, in fact, had been busted along with Prescott Bush.
Working with Union Bank.
And Prescott was actually the president of the bank.
And they were fronting for Fritz Tyson, which was an incredible German industrialist who'd supported Hitler and he was a steel magnate.
And Bush continued to manage his money and try to get around it.
And the number of deals that were going on there.
And FDR seized the bank.
He was like, You're trading with the enemy.
It's already 1942.
We're raging here with the Nazis and you're continuing to work their money through American banks.
And They were going to prosecute him, but I've tried to figure out why they didn't.
And Jim Mars actually, in one of my conversations with him, told me that Prescott Bush was in charge of the USO and that it would have looked bad for morale if they had, you know, said, Hey, look, he's a Nazi, he's collaborating with Nazis, and he created the USO.
So they decided to let him off with a warning.
But Dulles was involved in that whole thing.
And of course, his brother was Secretary of State John Foster Dulles.
So the Dulles brothers, unbelievable chessboard that they were working.
And Through a number of CIA actions in Iran and in Central America.
They were experts at overthrowing countries, they were experts at propaganda, but at a certain point they decided to take these techniques that they had used to win foreign elections and remove governments that they felt were hostile to the United States.
And they began to use those techniques here.
And this is where the real schism with Kennedy came up because.
From his point of view, they were taking too much power.
They were becoming a government in and of themselves.
And he, over and over again, when it came to policy decisions, he was running up against them.
So, in the Bay of Pigs, they had tried to force him into an all out war with Cuba.
In dealing with the Russians, they tried to force him into nuclear posturing.
In Vietnam, they tried to make him drive large scale people into Laos and into Vietnam, military personnel and boots on the ground.
And he was very resistant to do that.
As a matter of fact, When he was assassinated, he had a standing order to remove a thousand soldiers from Vietnam.
And he had no, you know, there were no shooting on the ground when Kennedy was in.
There were strictly military advisors, and he was getting ready to strip those.
So, you know, here are these guys in the CIA making all these plans and, you know, this kind of incredible thing that can be realized.
And here Kennedy comes along, this millionaire playboy with a lot of big ideas from this rich family.
Comes in and he wins the entire presidency, boots out a lot of the old gang, and ends up firing Dulles for trying to trick him into Cuba and taking on Cuba and taking over the country the way that we rolled into Iraq or something.
And Kennedy said, Well, they're second guessing me into World War III.
It's not going to happen.
And so he fired him and he fired his deputy, who was Charles Cabell.
And Cabell's brother was the mayor of Dallas, who was also a CIA asset.
That's something that came out in the last run of the JFK records.
And that was October 26th.
And we did a live show on it back there.
And then we produced a special for HBO's Vice at the time for all the records that were coming out.
But a lot of the records got held up then.
And they said, don't worry, in six months, you're going to get them all.
So, what happened instead, of course, we know how the situation traversed between the CIA, the tensions, and the president.
And I'll get back to that.
But basically, it led us to this day, which was when.
JFK was assassinated.
That's just a few minutes before.
And in the front, there is Governor John Connolly, who's going to become important in just about a minute here.
He was the Texas governor at the time, riding in the front.
And he too would get wounded in the shooting.
And when they remove Kennedy, they come up with this very implausible story of a patsy named Lee Harvey Oswald, who just happened to be hanging out in this building.
And lucky enough for him, the president happened to be going by and Gee, Oswald just happened to be lucky enough to have his rifle handy and get off these amazing shots.
And he only had to fire three shots, supposedly from this almost broken Manliker Carcano that they claimed they took from the Payne residence, which is where Oswald wasn't even living at the time, his wife was.
So it was an incredibly ridiculous story, but they had to do everything to make it stick.
And that is Oswald.
And the Civil Air Patrol at 15.
And that's also going to be important in a couple of minutes here.
And Oswald had worked for Guy Bannister, who was a right wing FBI agent in New Orleans.
So the idea of him being a big communist just shows that he's good at being a double agent, basically.
And all the things that they built up around that complete nonsense.
A number of researchers have come to grips with this kind of double agent role that Oswald had and realized he was a much deeper figure.
But there's a lot more that happened there in the assassination than just Oswald.
But I do want to point something out, which is you know, we're hearing so much about the records that the National Archives has, and these are so important that we need to get them.
Of course, the Garrison records are another set of records that they haven't released.
And today they really let down everybody by basically letting out the most fluff documents and keeping all the important stuff that the CIA just put their foot down.
And Trump, who talks a good game when it comes to the CIA, totally backed off.
And I'm going to get into that in a minute, but I want you to look at these two people.
Over here, let's see if I can get that.
That's George Joannides, and this is Bobby Inman.
These are very important people in the JFK saga.
Joannides, there's a lawsuit right now pending by Jefferson Morley, who is a Washington Post reporter, for all of his records because he's not included in the document dump of all these different JFK records that we're supposed to get.
And yet, it turns out from Jefferson Morley's research, which they wouldn't accept at the Washington Post, and then he left because they just didn't want to hear about it.
And he runs a site called JFK Facts now.
And what he found out was that Joe Nitties ran basically the Oswald op, and he was running the DRE, which was an anti Cuban group that was setting up Oswald's image as this ultra kind of Castro lover.
A Cuban communist and that whole thing, that they needed that image solidified before the assassination so that when the assassination took place and Oswald was in that building, they could say, aha, he was a communist, that's why he did it.
CIA Lies And Agendas00:08:19
The man standing next to him is Bobby Inman, who is one of the only deputy CIA directors on record to ever talk about reversed engineered UFO technology.
And that's going to also become significant in all this.
But for now, I'm going to stick to Trump's decision.
Strangely enough, there's a lot of parallels between these two presidents.
And Trump in particular, when he got into office, he took on a very similar type of problem that Kennedy had inherited, which is that the CIA were out of control.
And, you know, we had a series of CIA directors.
John Brennan was one of them.
They called him the drone king.
And, you know, the CIA has their own Air Force.
And they're basically running around the world running our policy.
And there's no standing up to them, basically, from the presidential level.
But when you get Trump in there, who they resisted because they wanted.
What was sort of a known commodity in Hillary Clinton?
It's quite interesting because the situation gets quite intense in a hurry, and they'll do anything to get Trump out, including make up phony dossiers.
You'll have CIA people coming out on shows like Meet the Press and showing their face and stuff.
You know, CIA directors don't like to do that, they like to keep a very low profile.
When they're out there, and when you see former National Intelligence Director James Clapper out there, who on the record lied to Congress, In session about surveillance of American citizens on the record, completely just outright lied.
And those guys coming out and saying, Oh, you know, Trump, basically, we're going to get you, you know.
And we've seen this recently now with John Brennan, who is there's a weird thing going on here because John Brennan is coming out and broadsiding Trump and saying, like, you know, you're a demagogue and all these types of things and you'll see your day and all this incredible, you know, from an intelligence community that's supposed to be.
He's retired now, but still, the intelligence community is kind of supposed to be at the service of the president.
These aren't supposed to be the kinds of things that you're doing and talking about.
But Brennan also did a weird thing and has a weird role.
Anyone here who knows about the TTSA knows about Luis Elizondo.
And the TTSA is to the Stars Academy.
They rolled out the CIA version of UFO disclosure, which was a complete joke.
But Elizondo's boss was John Brennan, the drone king.
And he's the one now talking.
John Brennan about UFOs.
He's like, oh, I think we should study it all of a sudden.
And so that's Elizondo's boss.
And Elizondo, of course, wants to come out and be the CNN charming guy with UFOs.
So the CIA wants to roll into this UFO threat idea now.
And it's a very dangerous situation because they've been subverting the research around that for over 70 years.
The last people in the world you want to trust on that score.
But on the political score, you know, they have their own agenda.
And here they are.
Taking on Trump.
Now, Trump did a very good job pushing them off.
And the fact is that the CIA's goal was to remove a sitting president that the American people had elected.
So there's no question that what was going on, the series of events that were taking place when he first got in, they were trying really hard right from the beginning, even before he was inaugurated, to make sure he didn't get in by releasing that phony dossier.
And there were political battles and all, but the intelligence community was completely out of control.
And frankly, the minute Trump got in, he should have ordered a huge house cleaning over there.
And instead, we got a situation where now we have Trump acting more and more in an opportunist fashion, which means, you know, were they threatening him with this phony Mueller probe with Russia?
Where, by the way, they haven't found anything in over a year.
Whatever it happens to be, I have to say that we just have a situation where Trump suddenly is not acting like the president that came into office with the mandate from people to break up the system as it was and make America great again and do these things.
Trump, in fact, has taken a number of wrong steps.
He's getting into bombing Syria.
He's appointed John Bolton as a national security advisor, who's an incredible war hawk.
On the Vietnam, on the Iran issue, which is ridiculous because war with Iran, it's a nation with 90 million people and it's a major oil producing nation.
It's the last thing in the world you want to do.
And, you know, they don't pose any threat to us right now.
Whatever we might think of their internal propositions as a government and the way that they're handling things on the ground there, you know, we don't have any good logical reason.
For going in there.
That's the fact.
Now, Pompeo, who was the CIA director, Mike Pompeo, simultaneously with this memorandum that Trump put out, got approved through the Senate, and I mean within minutes, to become the next Secretary of State, which a lot of people were predicting wasn't going to happen because people don't like his stance on Iran.
And in my last conversation with Catherine Austin Fitz, she said, You know, when we saw the previous secretary of state who was hanging in there and doing this job with Trump, he was somebody who wanted to keep the Iran deal that we had in place that Obama had negotiated.
And a lot of people have said it was a bad deal because we gave them money and all the rest of it.
But the goal was to basically reduce their nuclear program without a war, you know, without firing a shot and getting into a nuclear battle with these guys where Russia's going to get involved.
And there's some real flagrant thing over on our side right now where people think because.
Russia is, you know, that they're not in such a strong position that we can just roll into the Middle East or something.
It's incredibly bad advice.
It's incredibly stupid and it's incredibly profit driven, and we need to get out of that immediately.
So, Rex Tillerson takes the job as Secretary of State for a year and runs around the world doing all this stuff, but he will not get into this rhetoric that's anti Iran.
And I think that's crucial because Iran, a lot of people understand, are modernizing on the inside.
And it's not the kind of situation, you know, it's like the people on the inside, Because Iran is such a modern country, it's not like a throwback country in the Middle East.
It is, you know, it's advancing.
And one of the problems with that is that people don't want to wait.
You know, they're trying to force it into the situation where the government becomes perfect and our allies and all the rest of it.
But the truth is, the smart people who are looking on the ground see that one, Iran poses no threat to the United States, two, that it's always foolish for us to go in to the Middle East.
Militarily, it is not proven.
To be good for the country.
As Trump himself noted in regards to Bush's invasion of Iraq, which Pat Buchanan called the single greatest blunder in American foreign policy history.
And I agree with him.
I think it was an incredible mistake on Bush's side.
And, you know, we don't want to see a repeat of that under any precedent, even if Trump talked the right gang when he got in.
If he's going to morph into one of these neocons, then we have to acknowledge it now and kind of fall out of the stupor.
So, um, What came up was Pompeo becoming Secretary of State and then throwing Tillerson out.
But a lot of people were saying Pompeo is too much of a hawk in Iran.
It's not going to go through.
But suddenly, voila, today he's in.
And it happened within minutes of President Trump's memorandum.
Absurd Document Delays00:14:49
And I'm going to read the entire memorandum.
It shouldn't take too long.
Are you ready?
Olivia, how are we doing over there?
Doing great.
Fantastic.
Okay, Presidential Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies issued on April 26, 2018.
That's today, folks.
Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies.
Subject Certification for certain records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
As I explained in my temporary certification on October 26, 2017, the American people expect their government to provide as much access as possible to the President John F. Kennedy assassination records so that they may, as they deserve, finally be fully informed about all aspects of this pivotal event.
Over the past 180 days, executive departments and agencies have reviewed all of the information within records temporarily withheld from release and have proposed to the archivist of the United States that certain information should continue to be redacted because of identifiable national security, law enforcement, and foreign affairs concerns.
The archivist, remember, this is 55 years ago this incident happened.
Okay, and keep that in mind.
And by the way, the Soviet Union doesn't even exist anymore, so you have to wonder.
You know, I mean, China wasn't much of an issue in 1963.
So, you know, we're not at war with Vietnam anymore, and Cuba doesn't have Castro.
So, what exactly are you talking about?
Okay, now back to the document.
The archivist has reviewed the information agencies.
That's the CIA information agencies, keep it in mind.
Proposed to withhold.
The archivist has reviewed the information agencies proposed to withhold, agencies being the Central Intelligence Agency principally.
And believes the proposals are consistent with the standard section 5G2D of the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992.
Now, let me tell you, that act mandated that all the records be set free concerning the JFK assassination on October 26, 2017, six months ago.
They released a few then and they kept a bunch back, including the Garrison files, which are crucial, and other FBI files, absolutely crucial.
And again, today, you know, they're holding these records back.
Okay, back to Trump.
I agree with the archivist's recommendation that the continued withholdings are necessary to protect against identifiable harm to national security.
Again, 55 years ago, Soviet Union no longer exists.
Law enforcement or foreign affairs that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in immediate disclosure.
So let me sum that part up.
They're saying that there's something in those records.
That pertains to either active agencies or active operations, which is impossible 55 years later.
None of those people are operational.
They're dead or retired.
That's one.
To none of the operations because none of those countries are even exist as they were.
The Soviet Union is gone.
It's just Russia now.
It might be a little embarrassing, but it's ancient history 55 years ago.
So these explanations don't make any sense.
Okay, back to Trump.
So he's agreeing.
He's saying this recommendation, he's saying the archivist, but the archivist, it's the agencies proposed to withhold, and the archivist agreed.
So actually, what he's doing is he's agreeing with the CIA on this, saying the CIA has come in and they've said, Don't release this information because it has major implications for national security, law enforcement, or foreign affairs that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest and immediate disclosure.
Well, that's ridiculous.
Okay, back to Trump.
I'm also ordering agencies, okay, let's read CIA because it's the only agency that actually counts here, to re review each of those redactions over the next three years.
At any time during the review period, And no later at the end of that period, agencies shall disclose information that no longer warrants continued withholding.
Well, you get around to three years, okay, 2021, which is a weird time to choose.
Let's face it, they could have said two years, 10 years, 15 years, three years.
Well, the only thing we can see is that in 2021, the 2020 election will be over, and either Trump will have lost and it won't be his problem, or he'll be in a second term, and then they could say, oh, we want you to continue to not disclose this information.
Is that okay?
And he can just say, yeah.
All right.
That's called signing on to the CIA agenda to cover up.
The history of the JFK assassination period.
But let's keep going.
At any time during the review period and no later than the end of the period, agencies shall disclose information that no longer warrants continued withholding.
Accordingly, by the authority vested in me as President and Commander in Chief, by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby certify that all information within records that agencies have proposed for continued postponement under Section 5G2D of the Act.
Shall be withheld from public disclosure until no later than October 26, 21, when they get to review it again.
So he's saying, I'm going along my presidential powers here and rubber stamping the CIA's decision to postpone under Section 5G 2D of the Act to withhold from public disclosure all of those documents.
So the CIA doesn't have to answer for it, and there's no guarantee that in 2021 they get revealed.
Trump is just kicking the can down the road for either some other president or when he's back in and doesn't care.
Quote More Trump.
Any agency that seeks further postponement beyond the certification shall take note of the findings of the act, which state, among other things, that only in the rarest cases is there any legitimate need for continued protection of such records.
Okay, so the original congressional law mandated the JFK assassination record should come out.
And there's a line there that says, Only in the rarest cases is there any legitimate need for continued protection of such records.
Well, what's the rare case?
They're not even saying what it is.
So they have no cover for this.
This is just blatant block.
The need for continued protection can only grow weaker with the passage of time from this congressional finding.
Any agency that seeks further postponement beyond October 26, 2021, shall no later than April 26, 2021, identify to the archivist the specific basis for concluding the records.
Portions of the records satisfy the standard for continued postponement under 5G2D.
Well, if you just signed off on this, they'll sign off on it in 2021.
You'll never see the records.
The CIA wanted to keep the records closed forever, or at least till 2038, which is 75 years after the event.
Talk about what have you got to hide?
So this whole statement's an outrage, but I'm going to get into the end of it here.
Let's see.
The archivist is hereby authorized to direct to publish this memorandum to the Federal Register, Donald J. Trump.
That's the Donald Trump who got into office with the CIA at his throat.
With the incredible deep state actions to keep him out of office.
And so, you know, we have a really kind of a critical situation here with President Trump, which is that he is morphing into something which is not recognizable from the guy who got in.
And that's very tricky.
For him to go along with this, first of all, you know, we never understand what kind of media reaches the president.
So let's give this a shot.
If I were to give the president a little bit of advice, I would say this one, the CIA is trying to remove you from the presidency.
Let's start with that.
Two, satisfying them is not going to stop them from doing that.
What you should do is expose them.
Now, if you expose them and the hanky panky that they were pulling, the deep state operations around the JFK assassination, and then the efforts to cover it up, then they won't have the political clout to turn the screws on you and your presidency and turn you into the biggest hawk since George W. Bush.
So, the last thing in the world you want to do is give them the ability.
To, you know, and thinking that's kind of like a chess move or whatever.
One thing that I think is truly absurd here is we have to recognize that something is happening, which is people who agree with and put Trump in office.
And I've been very supportive of getting someone in office who was not part of that deep state, who was not part of the Clinton Bush machine, who was not deep on the intelligence side, was not a creation of the central intelligence agencies, as many of the Precedents have become.
But I have to say that what we're looking at with Trump at this point is there's a lot of people out there who just think, oh, Trump is a white hat and he's doing all these things and all the rest of it.
And they're throwing around these ridiculous terms.
By the way, white hat doesn't mean anything, neither does black hat.
Those are stupid determinations, as are the good guys and the bad guys.
You know, what you have is one set of the deep state and then you have maybe progressive people in the public state.
But on the covert side, You can't see who they are.
So, for you to determine one person is a white hat or not is ridiculous.
So, we have over and over again these people reporting on these situations who just don't understand.
And the alternative spin on this is as bad as the mainstream spin.
So, let me give everyone a little bit of a way to look at this.
First of all, when a president bombs another country as Trump bombed Syria, that's not 4D chess.
That's not giving a high sign to Vladimir Putin and saying we're bombing the deep states to Syria.
There's a lot of stupid stuff floating around the independent community.
And Q is right at the heart of it.
Q is muddying up so much of real politics because it's getting people who are pro Trump to say stupid things.
I've had a little bit of a clue that the Q thing is about IQ, it's lowering our IQ.
My feeling is we need to take a real serious look at the situation.
Trump has John Bolton as national security advisor.
Incredible Russian enemy, incredible Iran hawk.
Not a good choice for a national security advisor.
He was Bush's ambassador to the United Nations.
We don't want Bush people.
Trump was supposed to come in and do things differently.
And frankly, you can see in the first year that he tried, and some of the people that he had there, I think, were performing well, including Tillerson.
So, throwing Tillerson out and getting Pompeo, who was a hawk at CIA, in as Secretary of State, that's not a usual step, by the way.
It's not usually CIA agent, Secretary of State, CIA director, Secretary of State.
This is unusual stuff.
Now, he, Pompeo, gets solidified, as I said earlier.
He becomes basically passed by the Senate.
He's all set.
He's going to be the next Secretary of State.
Okay, Trump chose him, whatever.
But it happens literally within minutes of Trump putting out this really ridiculous memoranda that protects the CIA using a lot of gobbledygook language.
Now, I hate to go all legal on the president, but this is a legal mandate from Congress to release these records.
And it seems like it's in his best interest to release them because the CIA is playing games and wants him out of office.
He knows that.
So, Maybe somebody is saying, you know, you're holding cards or whatever.
And I'm sure, you know, we're in this situation where there's so much second guessing around what is this guy thinking?
But for me, bombing Syria, appointing Bolton, appointing Pompeo, and then the new CIA director is somebody who was in charge of torture during the Iraq war.
These are not good moves.
You know, the advice, the start of this second year of the presidency isn't looking good.
So that's very disturbing.
But let's talk about why the CIA is in trouble over this.
Why is the CIA trying to block this?
Why are they keeping it from the American people?
Who are the CIA exactly?
What are we talking about?
Why does this agency, this extra legal agency, posing such a threat to normal democratic justice in America and around the world, why can't anybody get their handle on these guys?
Starting with Eisenhower sending it off to JFK, JFK getting assassinated, them installing LBJ, you know, who was really an easy mark.
And then, you know, Nixon getting in and Nixon trying to play games and trying to blackmail them, saying, you know, I know you were involved in that JFK thing and you shouldn't look into my activities and them hitting the roof and all the rest of it.
We have the whole back and forth play that was going on between, you know, Richard Helms, who was the CIA director, and President Nixon, and eventually Watergate takes down Nixon.
So we have this real strange situation.
And of course, by the time you get to the 70s, there's an attempt to defang the CIA.
And that attempt runs through groups that really are looking at the JFK assassination.
That's really the church committee fundamentally.
Remember, there were five major investigations into the JFK assassination.
You had the Warren Commission, which really was headed up by Alan Dulles, who was The CIA director that he fired.
So they found the lone nut solution and the magic bullet.
So that's all the fake stuff.
The next major investigation is Jim Garrison.
Five Major Investigations00:05:25
Well, what did Jim Garrison say?
He said that the Central Intelligence Agency had been involved and that President Kennedy had been involved, had been assassinated by the Central Intelligence Agency.
This was his conclusion after studying it for three years and taking people to trial and all the rest of it.
But a little known thing that came up in my investigation around Garrison that people don't really talk about, but I think it's crucial, which is that.
He phoned up the editor of Ramparts magazine, which is kind of like Rolling Stone back in the day.
And he said, I need to speak with you about this.
It looks like the Texas oil men weren't involved in the assassination the way that we thought.
I've isolated the players down to the aerospace industry in the military industrial complex.
And he was talking about Boeing and Hughes.
And that's where he had isolated it down.
And that's when the CIA had elected to try to destroy Garrison's reputation.
And His entire investigation and the trial.
And they did.
They did a pretty good job on his reputation until he came back as the leading figure in the JFK movie.
Under Oliver Stone's direction, they brought him out.
And what happened?
We got the 1992 Records Act.
That's what President Trump is responding to here.
So we have to put these things together.
You know, we're looking at a situation really where the Central Intelligence Agency has tried all these ways and means.
Now, in the 70s, when they were under the gun and when they were under examination, you can go back and read it.
And people understand that there's this kind of rogue agency that's out of control.
And, you know, what exactly are we going to do?
And so you have hardcore investigations, the Pike Committee investigations.
We're still not allowed to see those records until 2040.
And these are about the different activities that the CIA is doing in Central America and other places.
So we're looking at a situation that is kind of hard to deny that in the late 70s they understood it.
Now there's a little known.
Fact that comes out that in the late 70s, they get a stat from the CIA that over 400 media personnel working actively in the media at ABC and others are CIA agents.
So the CIA is running the media at that point.
And so what happens is Jimmy Carter gets in, he's not too fond of the situation.
And because of the investigations, the CIA is weakened.
And people like Jesus James Angleton and the really hardcore guys.
They have to let down a little bit.
They're gone, they're fired, and their roles you know, Helms gets fired, he becomes the ambassador to Iran, and then they throw him out of that.
So Jimmy Carter puts in Stansfield Turner, which is a friend of his who was like from military college, he was an admiral and all the rest of it.
But he gets in there, and the way that it works is that the CIA called him the mailman, which is he delivered messages from the president about what he wanted the CIA to do.
And of course, we had Bush as the CIA director, and Carter fired him.
For not giving him the details on the UFO file.
So we've got a really messy situation.
And what happens is Bush, the CIA director, becomes vice president under Reagan in 1980.
And Reagan gets shot in the first year in March.
So he's inaugurated in January.
Two months later, he's shot.
And with Bush waiting in the wings as the CIA director, I mean, there's a whole strange thing there about who shot.
And it was John Hinckley Jr.
And Hinckley, his family was very tight with the Bushes, which is something that even the media reported on nervously at first like, what's going on here?
You know, why would you use this guy to shoot President Reagan?
So it's a very risky maneuver in any case, but it's undeniable.
So they were probably hoping right there, instead of waiting eight years for Bush to get in, boom, they could start in 1981 with this program of remaking the world.
Instead, Reagan, after getting assassinated, has a tougher time governing, and Bush takes over a lot of the duties of running the government.
And he runs the whole covert channel with people like Oliver North and all the rest of it, gets into a whole lot of Trouble funneling money to countries like Iran.
At that time, we didn't want to bomb Iran.
We wanted to give them money to do things that we said.
So it's a very tricky situation.
And then what happens?
America, you know, we elect Bush in 88 and he takes over.
You know, he's the CIA agent who could and he becomes president.
And then we get Clinton in that whole period and what they call the Rape of Russia, where the Soviet Union falls and instead of Us cutting our defense spending or whatever.
Now, you know, we're spending more than ever on defense, and it doesn't make any sense because even at the height of the Cold War, it wasn't as big of a percentage of our outlay as it is now.
You know, the world has $1.1 trillion in defense spending, and we're over $700 billion of that.
Bush As A Deep Player00:02:44
So the situation is definitely out of whack, but at the heart of it is this agency operating in so many different fields operating in entertainment, operating in the political circles, and taking too much power.
So Why are these records so important?
Well, if they participated in the JFK assassination, first of all, that's the secret that they've been hiding for over 55 years, which is that they removed a sitting president that the American people had elected.
And that kind of outrage probably would spell the end of the agency as it stands today.
There's a lot of hardcore information that suggests the Central Intelligence Agency was involved not only in the assassination, but certainly in the cover up, because Alan Dulles himself.
Who was fired by Bush and by Kennedy in '61?
He leads the Warren Commission and comes up with all the phony magic bullet stuff that we have to live with and people have to grow up with in their high school books and all this kind of nonsense.
So I do think it's kind of important, but I want to take a look at a few unusual deeper strands for us to take a deep look at who was actually pulling the strings behind the JFK assassination briefly here.
And I want to show you this gentleman.
That is D.H. Bird.
And they call him Dryhole Bird.
He's a Texas oil man who started the Civil Air Patrol, and he owned the Texas School Book Depository.
Now, the Texas School Book Depository is where the shots were presumably fired from, and they were employing Lee Harvey Oswald, who we looked at earlier.
Now, the picture I showed earlier of Lee Harvey Oswald was him in the Civil Air Patrol, which was founded by our friend here.
Who is also the owner of the Texas School Book Depository and a major fundraiser for LBJ?
Now, it just so happens as the limousine turns that corner that the shots are attributed to the Texas School Book Depository.
In fact, most of the shots came from other directions.
And we know there may have been as many as 11 shots fired.
And the official story is three, and two hit, one miss, and one.
Bullet caused seven wounds, and all the nonsense that they had about that.
So they came up with this crazy excuse and they made the public buy it, but no one really ever bought it.
As a matter of fact, their most recent poll on it is that 72% of Americans don't believe the official story.
So, they failed in that sense, which is the mind job failed on it.
But nonetheless, the wheels of the deep state roll on.
But they probably do feel that it's an Achilles heel for them.
The Official Shot Story00:15:43
So, anytime major records are up for coming out, anything that will reveal their position.
So, now we're looking here at Dryhole Bird, and there's a few odd connections to him.
First is that his cousin is Admiral Bird.
Who is well known for all of his major travels and for specifically for Antarctica?
As a matter of fact, there's a mountain in Antarctica named after him because Admiral Byrne named it after his famous oil cousin.
What's even stranger is that another relative of his, another cousin, is Johnson's best friend and lead man in the Senate, and both of them work on CIA appropriations, the black budget, and NASA.
So, you have that whole arc of things.
And then when we get to the records that they're withholding now, a lot of them have to do with Garrison and Garrison's investigation.
Well, remember, Garrison thought that aerospace was involved in this assassination.
That's what he had narrowed it down to.
So, he was going past the oil man stuff and going, hey, it somehow has to do with this aerospace thing.
Well, everywhere he was going when he was showing up to investigate this crime, there were people saying, well, you know what?
Oswald said he left New Orleans because he was going to go join NASA.
But that's where his next job was.
And all the people he worked with at Riley, they'd all gone into working for NASA or other aerospace companies.
Now, we've talked a lot in this series about the X technology.
And Walter Dornberger, who was the Nazi scientist that we brought over here, and he was the head of the Nazi rocket program, but he was also the head of Bell Helicopter.
And Bell Helicopter had Michael Payne as his understudy, basically.
And what happened was Payne wound up hosting the Oswalds.
With his wife Ruth, who was a Quaker.
Michael Payne died recently, but it's always been a very unusual situation because when we look at the connections there, how odd is it that this couple returning from Russia, Oswald coming back from Russia with a Russian wife, is going to stay at the home of an engineer from Bill Helicopter, who is the protege of Walter Dornberger, who was the paperclip scientist that we brought over here to complete the rocket program.
There's this weird shadow that follows in the JFK assassination.
It follows Oswald.
And it follows people around the assassinations along with the deaths around it for the witnesses and people connected to it.
Those are good reasons for the CIA not to want that information to come out because their role could get exposed through the connections.
And as we make those connections, and certainly the documents make that easier.
Now, I'm not saying that I think that those documents contain something that says we have evidence, you know, and it's going to instantly clear up the entire situation.
But the thing is, If there's enough evidence in there, if there are enough links in there with the investigators on the ground, I mean, even in the stuff that I've uncovered since I did my documentary, Agent Oswald, four years ago, just in that period of time, even the connection to Admiral Byrd and Dryhole Byrd owning the Texas School Book Depository is very unusual.
And also the work that Peter Dale Scott has done on the JFK assassination relating to this, you can see with a little more information they can close the circuit.
They don't need the government.
To tell them what happened, they'll be able to close the circuit themselves.
And don't get me wrong, in so many cases, they pretty much can.
But withholding those records creates a barrier.
It creates a schizophrenic situation, just like the secrecy around the UFO file, in my opinion.
So I think we're looking at a situation where the JFK records are being held back.
And we have to take a look at it and say, why are they holding it back?
I mean, we're talking from a very informed level, you and I, because we've looked into these things and because we've done shows on them and we've had the best experts on them.
We've had the best minds look at them.
And in the case of Professor Scott, he's worked on it for over 50 years.
We have the benefit of what he has done.
Came up with in looking at this.
But the average person just looking at it, there's still the wall of secrecy going on there in relation to a crime that was committed 55 years ago.
And removing a president of the United States, you know, it's one thing to assassinate a political leader.
And when JFK's brother was assassinated, to assassinate a senator who was running for president, which we all also know is incredibly.
Sketchy situation, and certainly we never got the right answers on that either, including the fact that mind control was used on the assassin.
I mean, it's a pretty sketchy situation, but removing a president requires a number of things because it's an incredible gesture legally in terms of the leadership of the country.
There's so many things that go into it that when Professor Peter Dale Scott calls it the deep state revolt against the White House, we have to consider why they would risk exposure on that level.
What is the true reasoning behind them taking John F. Kennedy out?
There's good evidence for sure that his posture relating to Cuba, his posture relating to Vietnam, he was not going to go into those places.
He was not going to put military boots in the ground.
He wasn't going to feed that military machine.
He wanted to work with the Russians on the space program.
He did not want a space race.
He wanted a joint moon mission, which would have had us both landing on the moon.
It would have been a uniting proposition.
And in the work of people like Joseph Farrell, for example, they say, well, the suggestion is that right there, where he wants to work with the Soviet Union on a moon mission, means we have to share the technology that we have that's advanced.
And some of these things I've gone into, like the program we had for Blue Gemini, which was kind of a breakaway program inside of the space program.
At a certain point, Defense Secretary Robert McNamara comes in from speaking with JFK and he says, you know, We have to stop these guys basically because they're creating their own space program.
We'll have two space programs and we don't know basically all the players in that one.
And JFK sends them in and they pull the plug on Blue Gemini.
But what's going on there?
It's like there's a group, and part of that group has been identified with the Wernher von Braun team that came in from Germany, who we assigned to NASA.
But part of it is part of this deep state arm that's reaching into the aerospace wing again.
So when we can see them blocking the records from Jim Garrison's investigation, It's so much more pivotal when we look into it because we're looking at a situation also where Garrison went into it thinking, I'm solving this great crime and the law enforcement agencies and the CIA will be on my side.
And when they turned against them, when they turned against Garrison, he got the idea pretty quick of what was really going on.
And his conclusion was these were fascist forces that were.
Taking hold on America and that the CIA was operating domestically, which was not in their mandate.
So, you know, the presidential memoranda is very interesting from Trump today because it's saying the congressional rules that we came up with from public demand through the congressional representatives are just going to be put aside because the Central Intelligence Agency is going to again pull that power.
And, you know, this is unrivaled power on their part where they're still not towing the line to the law.
So they're acting outside of the axis of the law.
And so, what do you do in a situation like that?
You would imagine that the president would put his foot down and say, No, this was mandated by Congress.
Here's my signature, and it's all done.
We're a transparent country, and our government's going to be transparent going forward, regardless of what happened in the past.
I mean, the JFK story principally works like this JFK gets in, he's independent enough to make his own decisions.
He decides the CIA has usurped the public government operating on a covert level.
And I want to say one thing about the CIA so that we know exactly who we're talking about.
Because the Central Intelligence Agency was created under the National Security Act in 1947 by Harry Truman, President Harry Truman, and the idea was they were going to gather information the way that the OSS did during the war.
It was like an intelligence unit.
And this is how they were going to do things.
Now, there were groups that split off from the CIA.
One was called OPC, which was the Office of Policy Coordination.
And they decided we have our own mandate based on this intelligence thing.
We're going to go in and monkey with the Italian elections.
We're going to do all these things.
And at first, you know, Truman's looking overseas and looking at the battle we have against the Soviet bear and thinking, well, this is good.
You know, they're getting some things done, swinging the elections our way.
But then they start doing things like blowing up trains.
And really subverting other governments on the fly.
And he realizes that they're out of control and he goes back to his CIA people like Dulles and says, That's not what the CIA is supposed to be.
Go get that Office of Policy Coordination and bring them under your wing now.
Make it happen before I have to round those guys up.
And so what happens is the Office of Policy Coordination and all of their Cold War activities come under the umbrella of the CIA.
But what is said that over the course of that Truman into Eisenhower administration, the OPC takes over.
The CIA, so that what the CIA was created for, the mandate that they were given, was to gather intelligence, not to overthrow other countries or create the Bay of Pigs or any of these other things.
So this group becomes overpowering.
And they suddenly have access to military power, to Wall Street power, and they are the puppets of the deep state.
They're a major piece of it.
But remember, the deep state has many different functions.
And The players in the deep state that can use the CIA, a lot of them come from Wall Street.
Because remember, Dulles is a Wall Street lawyer, he's no military mastermind.
And one of his key lieutenants is Richard Helms.
Well, his great claim to fame is that he shared a booth as a journalist with Hitler in the 1936 Olympics when no one else could.
So, what kind of impression did that make on a young Helms who then takes over the CIA?
You know, you can't help but wonder that these guys admired Hitler.
So, there's a lot of fascist strains, of course.
In the CIA.
And one of the crucial things that we did under Harry Truman's administration after we defeated Germany in the war is we adopted one of their main CIA chiefs, their intelligence chiefs.
And we basically said, keep running your network and we won't disturb you or your agents.
So we had these Nazis working for us.
And you can understand that we needed the intelligence against the Soviet Union, okay.
But The amount of infiltration that these people could now do working with our CIA as intelligence liaisons and with people like Dulles, who remember had been part of that crew working with Bush that had been sanctioned for working with Union Bank, laundering all this money for Tyson, who was a German corporate Moogle who was really in deep with the Nazis.
And the government saying, Look, this is a Nazi bank, throw it out.
So we've got a weird strain of power there.
But what happens is instead of getting the Kennedy dynasty.
Through this whole period, we get the Bush dynasty.
We get Prescott Bush, George Bush, and George W.
And we almost, they wanted to get Jeb on us.
Thank God that he was such a terrible candidate that he didn't even have a shot.
But this is the kind of stuff that they've tried to roll our way.
But I think when we get back to it, if we think of the CIA, it was something that Harry Truman created in 1947.
A month to the day after the JFK assassination, Truman pens.
An op ed for the Washington Post, and he says, This is not what the CIA was created for.
Let's get rid of it.
As it stands, rework it.
They were never meant to take on.
Now, a lot of people say he was inspired to do that because he felt the CIA had taken JFK out of the picture.
And he was really nervous.
He was really concerned about what was happening to the country.
And he just felt like they were running beyond their mandate.
I mean, they're running the whole government, you know, and then here they are taking out their leader.
So, It turns out in one of his bios now, that night that he penned the op ed, the very same night, Alan Dulles shows up, who's the fired CIA director and now the head of the Warren Commission, or soon to be the head of the Warren Commission.
And he goes to Truman and he says, Well, you have to retract it immediately and say you were wrong.
And Truman says, No, go to hell.
I created the CIA, I know what it was for, and I'm not going to take back anything.
And Truman says, Well, you could, you know, I mean, Dulles says to Truman, You could live to regret that.
And Truman says, I'm an old man, you know, threaten me all you want.
I'm not taking it back.
So what happens is, Dulles comes back and says, Oh, you know, he's talking at an editorial function about two months later.
And he says, Oh, Truman is feeble now.
You know, VA just caught up with him.
It was just crazy.
That was just an act of craziness.
And he actually didn't even say that.
Like, you know, he wanted to retract it, but he was.
Too senile to do it.
This is the kind of dance that was going on because they were smacking at the power base.
And these people and this thing that the CIA and the deep state represent, we don't get to see the whole thing.
I will tell you that I've looked deeply, and it seems to me that people like Garrison, people like Peter Dale Scott, even John F. Kennedy, they get to this point, they get right up against it, and they're like, what is this thing?
It is money laundering.
It's running drugs.
It is creating an aerospace connection on its own.
It's got these worldwide connections and it's infiltrating the heart of our government.
So it seems to me that when they make moves against it, you know, and when things happen, that element retreats and it lets the regular players take the heat.
So that when you had the church committee hearings, when you had the JFK assassination record review board, the ARRB, the people who come forward have to take the heat.
Intelligence Agency Moves00:11:03
They fire them.
Jesus James Angleton's out of there, Richard Helms is out of there.
And they do kind of a cleaning house.
But one of the things that Professor Scott informed me of was something called the Safari Club, which was a group of international arms smugglers and producers.
And a lot of these guys would show up in different various activities throughout the 70s, 80s, and 90s around assassinations, political coups, and all the rest of it.
And Helms, Richard Helms, was part of this group, our retired, fired.
By Nixon, CIA director, and a lot of other out of work CIA agents.
They were good at doing all this covert stuff.
So the Safari Club hangs out during the Carter administration as a kind of unofficial CIA offshore waiting to get back into power.
And when Reagan gets in, they've got Bush as VP.
They try to shoot Reagan, and Bush takes on much more authority.
They get William Casey in there, who's one of the most diabolical CIA directors.
And what do we do?
We play Shoot It Up in Nicaragua and El Salvador, and we get into a number of situations.
In those countries, and we're back to the old CIA infiltration.
And of course, this happens throughout time.
And by the time we get to Afghanistan and Iraq, you know, it's carte blanche CIA activity.
And they become incredibly good with the whole drone warfare thing.
And now the big danger is we see the CIA muscling into the whole UFO story, and they're still holding back information about a president that was assassinated 55 years ago.
And now we have to say to ourselves, why does the current president, who has really taken the sting of the CIA, who they try to block from getting in in the first place, why is he protecting them?
So we're in a very strange situation, I would say.
And we need to kind of, in the grand scheme of things, I think we need to improve the way that we're looking at the situation on the ground.
I don't see in the mainstream media, it's all whitewash.
And in the alternative media, I'm seeing.
A really bizarro kind of like Q.
It's like people on drugs with readings from Q. By the way, Q is a.
This is a.
They're posting on 4chan, which is predominantly a pornography site.
So you have all these Christians and people saluting the white hats who are for Trump.
And you have an anonymous poster on a porn site directing your movement.
I mean, what is going on there?
Get back to your hardcore.
Values and do something good for the country.
Don't be swayed by some anonymous poster somewhere.
Do your own thinking.
And I think that a lot of that has been to soften people up so that when things happen, like when Trump bombs Syria, somebody can say, Oh, don't worry, it's 4D chest.
Trust us.
It's not 4D chest.
When you bomb another country, you are the responsible officer of your country and you take the responsibility for it.
President Trump is responsible for bombing Syria.
And if that turns into a firing war with the Soviets, with the Russians, then we're going to be in a shooting war, which could lead to World War III.
It's a terrible idea.
All the hawks that are around Trump right now, John Bolton, for example, the Trump people, the Trump supporters should be out there saying, What the hell are you doing?
Who are these people?
We don't want to go to war with Iran.
We don't want to bomb Syria.
We don't want tension with Russia.
That's the reason we got you in instead of Clinton.
So instead, we have people running around and saying, Oh, it's 4D chess and white hats and Ben Fulford crap from 2011.
Let's wake up here.
What is that stuff?
If you hear people talking about that, slap them silly and wake them up because.
It's junk.
This is junk that got peddled by Ben Fulford in 2011 about cabal arrests.
None of that stuff ever happens.
And anytime anything happens around the world, they claim success.
It's like a weird meme.
And I think what is important is if we're to get a logical look at what's going on in the country, we have to take a deep look and say that the Central Intelligence Agency has gotten a lot of leverage in the deep state, forced President Trump to stand down on the JFK records, which would have given him great leverage to deal with.
Them.
So that's why it's particularly strange.
And if they've struck some kind of a deal that they're going to go into some war pose to solve our problems, then the Trump fans and the Trump supporters need to call him to task and say, look, you've got Republican elections coming up in the fall.
How would you like the rug pulled out from all of your Republicans that are supposed to support you in Congress?
You won't be able to get anything done.
So instead of people running around and saying, I've connected the dot from Q or You know, some of these older guys who should know better out there, it's embarrassing.
So, you know, it's not 4D chess when you bomb a country.
And if you're threatening Russians, then you're threatening Russians.
That's pretty scary.
These are nuclear powers.
It's not the kind of thing that we should do.
You know, here's some good stats for you if you want to think about Russia correctly.
Russia, in this is something that David Stockman points out Russia spends in a year what we spend.
In two weeks on defense.
How much of a threat is Russia to the United States?
Practically zero.
Now, Russia also, their economy basically is contained for us within the city of Manhattan.
Okay, so why are we portraying them as this huge worldwide force that needs to be fought against and everyone's a collaborator?
You know, the media was like fake news and alternative media is hooked up with the Kremlin and all this BS.
And those were liberals who were doing like a 50s type McCarthyite scare.
You have to wonder about the amount of brainwashing that's going on and the desperate moves.
I mean, how do these people even call themselves on the liberal left anymore?
I don't see it.
If they want war with, you know, they're only happy when Trump bombs Syria or they want war with Russia.
By the way, Russia has a Satan 2 nuclear missile now.
Okay.
None of this stuff is fun on either side.
To me, it's going to not very good place.
I say we take this Kennedy block, the records block on the Kennedy thing, and use it as a rallying cry to wake up and say, on the political end of things, let's look at this for real.
And the Trump supporters need to say to Trump, we don't think it's 4D chess and we don't want you bombing Syria.
Don't do it.
If you want to talk to Putin, don't let the CIA block you.
That's a deep state move.
Because they know that Russia won't accept GMOs.
There's a lot of different things there.
And in Iran's case, they want to break away with their own currency.
They don't want to be paid.
They don't want to be under that system.
They'll never fall into the digital currency system.
They'll never get a worldwide grid without Russia and Iran in that system.
Some of the encouraging moves that we've seen in relation to North Korea and all the rest of it, you know, this stuff, that stuff's terrific.
I wish they would do more of that.
But can we practice that on the other side of the pond also?
You know, I think that we're in a real interesting situation with this.
But I always say that the pivotal point in American history is the JFK assassination.
Because it takes the covert power, the covert side, and puts them on top.
And the public power is subservient to this covert machine and it runs on their policies.
And from there out, what did they do?
In moves like Watergate, in moves like Iran Contra, the October surprise, the financial coup d'etat of 2008, they've been active and we haven't been able to get our hands on who the actors are.
And we have these concepts and these ideas.
We understand what the deep state is from the work of Peter Dale Scott.
But, like I said, that's a very technical, special term.
And what it applies to is not former government officials or government officials who stay in past the administrations.
There's a weird meme out there that this is what the deep state is, it has nothing to do with bureaucrats that hang out in the government past different administrations.
That has nothing to do with the deep state.
Zero.
So the deep state gets thrown around like this flimsy term, and the mainstream media uses it for their own purposes.
And the alternative media either doesn't know what it is, in which case they should go read one, The American Deep State by Professor Peter L. Scott.
He tells you what it is.
You can watch my four interviews with Professor Scott on this channel starting in 2014.
Professor Scott knows what the deep state is.
He created the term.
What is the deep state, according to Professor Scott?
Well, It's a system of power that involves Wall Street.
It involves the intelligence agencies.
It involves the oil companies.
And it involves the contracting agencies that handle things for the intelligence companies, like Booz Allen Hamilton, for example, which is where Edward Snowden came from.
So I think we get a much better picture working with direct material and working with the actual sources, the actual people.
I think it'll give us a better picture on how to handle this.
And so when we hear things about arrests and all this stuff, just get rid of that noise.
It doesn't mean anything.
What's happening on the ground, really?
What's happening on the ground is the CIA just blocked a bunch of John F. Kennedy assassination documents that have been sitting there for 55 years, where the people have the right to know what the government is hiding in relation to Kennedy's assassination, especially since they gave us the phony story of Oswald.
Who was a 24 year old Marine who apparently had nothing to do with the shooting at all, but just was set up, happened to be in the building, was owned by D.H. Byrd, who was Admiral Byrd's cousin and who started the Civil Air Patrol and was also LBJ's fundraiser in Texas.
So, you know, that's what we're really talking about.
LBJ Business Partners Exposed00:02:48
Ask yourself in any real scenario because we go into a weird fantasy when we look at history because the Oswald story is so ridiculous.
That Oswald wanted to be a big shot, and it just so happened that he gets this really terrible job at the Texas School Book Depository, which just so happens to be owned by the former guy who started the Civil Air Patrol and is a big oil man supporter of Johnson.
And we know that Johnson very easily, smoothly gets into that position from vice president to president.
Well, he's very happy to.
You know why?
Because there's an indictment sitting in Washington for when they come back from Texas, and it's about to take LBJ down in relation to the Bobby Baker scandal.
Well, Bobby Baker was the secretary to LBJ when he was in the Senate.
And LBJ's business partner, Billy Celestis, is already serving time in prison because of all the chicanery that they were doing in funneling government money for phony cotton allotments and things that weren't even there.
Bobby Baker goes to prison.
Well, who's the only one who doesn't go to prison?
LBJ.
And LBJ doesn't go to prison because he becomes the president.
But there was a pending indictment there.
And as a matter of fact, Nixon, who happened to be in Texas while the assassination took place, He talks to the Dallas Morning News that morning that Kennedy's assassinated, and he says, Oh, LBJ will be off the ticket in 64.
Everyone knows it.
So, LBJ, according to JFK's secretary, he said, Oh, yeah, I'm going for Sanford, Terry Sanford in North Carolina.
He's going to be the VP in 64.
We're going to let Lyndon go because he's in a lot of trouble.
So, LBJ was headed to prison.
There's no question about it.
And I'll tell you another very interesting thing.
You hear about all these kinds of Official people doing the bios and stuff, and everyone says, Oh, Philip Caro's bio, you know, it's just amazing of LBJ and all the rest.
And, you know, granted, he's a good writer and all the rest of it, but he leaves Billy Celestes out.
How can you do that?
Here's LBJ's business partner who goes to jail while he's VP, and you're going to leave him out?
By the way, Billy Celestes gets out of prison in 1984.
And what does he do?
He offers in grand jury testimony to give a list of people that LBJ ordered killed.
And who's on the list?
Top of the list, John F. Kennedy.
So, it's interesting how the powers that be spin these things.
And, you know, there was a special that tried to cover this called The Men Who Killed Kennedy that ran on the History Channel.
As soon as it ran, boom, all these people came forward to sue the director, including Bill Clinton, by the way, and Gerald Ford and LBJ's wife.
And so, the way that these things are operated, I think it was quite important.
Consolidating Power Now00:08:53
And we have to see that the way that power moves.
You know, I often make this comparison to Doris Kearns Goodwin, who talks so glowingly about LBJ and they feature her in all these PBS specials.
And that's all fine and well.
But I think they should mention that she was his lover for a year and a half and they had an extramarital affair when she was a young journalism student.
I mean, that's kind of important.
It might give you a bias in terms of how you're reporting on this guy.
You know, so a lot of these people, we find a lot of them are associated with the Council on Foreign Relations and it's like a family.
They're all knit like.
That.
And unfortunately, there's been this centralization of connections, centralization of power, and centralization now of money.
And if you look at that wage gap thing, it goes along with the political corruption.
If you're looking from 1980 to now, you see that top level has grown dramatically in terms of their income.
And other people have either gone down lower or stayed the same.
So this is the nature of the country and the nature of the situation now.
Of course, the world has their own political problems.
And I am focusing here just on our country.
And looking at the things that are going on in America, because I think this decision by Trump to block these records is very symptomatic of where we are.
And people who study the JFK assassination are very disappointed because they thought, at least with Trump, they'd get a chance on this because he was not beholden to the intelligence agencies.
And this was his great strength.
Unfortunately, what we're seeing is the CIA takeover of the Trump administration.
That's where you get Pompeo coming in as Secretary of State from CIA Director.
And that's where you see people like John Bolton coming in.
These aren't encouraging developments, but I do think that they can be stopped through popular persuasion.
At least it's something we should be aware of.
But when we look back on the importance of the information that they're blocking in relation to the JFK assassination, we have to keep in mind that John F. Kennedy was the last president who was able to operate independently of the wishes of the alternative, of the wishes of the Intelligence Committee.
And The intelligence groups, the CIA in particular, have too much sway over the American system.
And they're kind of an artificial outgrowth because, even as Truman said, who created them, they weren't created for this.
So they've got their own mandate.
And now, added to that, we have the NSA and their incredibly sweeping powers.
And William Binney did an incredibly compelling presentation on those new sweeping powers.
And to go into it real briefly, They now have the ability to just create scenarios that they pick up on and say, well, you know, we think there's a criminal situation going on here.
Feed that information to law enforcement and say, look, it's classified.
So you have to make up your own story about how you got it.
You can't say you got it from us.
So you put that together with the incredible emphasis on space development and the satellite development and the space fence, which we have Elena Freeland coming on the show later this spring to talk about her incredible work around the space fence.
And what you're seeing is a real control grid.
That's going to cover the entire globe, and they're going to try to control all the activities on the ground.
And it's a very dangerous situation.
I don't think that it's something that will go down easily with the public.
But if they can distract us with things like Syrian wars or getting us into World War III with Russia, who knows?
I also think that people in Russia should understand that, by and large, the citizens of the United States do not have any.
Feelings that they want to go to war with Russia at all.
And these skirmishes that are being played up by members of our government after Trump initially got in and they try to bully him into saying, hey, if you don't bomb Russia, if you don't fight with them, then you're a Russian agent.
This nonsense.
That's real dirty politics.
And that's super deep state action.
And I think it shows the fingerprints of intelligence on that.
And we've seen these former directors just come out and savage Trump.
So, we're looking at a very dangerous situation.
And I think that the blocking of the JFK records is a major symptom of that.
We should always point it back to the JFK assassination.
That is the seminal moment.
That is where the covert state took over what was going on in the public state, in the overt state.
And so, this is the nature of the situation that we're looking at.
The best way to get us back to some kind of stasis, which is, I think, where Trump was heading when he got in, is to take more of that power back.
From those agencies and to kind of consolidate the power in the presidency and the Congress representing the public, with the public having the ability to pressure them.
If we have these kind of runaway corporate groups running things, and like they're saying right now, we can't tell the difference between the CIA and Amazon, and then all these guys get together at Davos and have a latte discussing how they're going to downsize the population and consolidate power and how they're going to.
Robotize everything and get robotics going and automate the whole scene, and we'll have robot bartenders and driverless cars.
It's not a very good looking future unless somebody like Trump has the courage to stand up and do something about it and move us towards a more human civilization.
If we don't get that, then I think we're going to have a lot of problems, really.
And I specifically am looking at the foreign policy team around Trump right now and the actions of blocking the JFK assassination records from coming out and thinking to myself, This is pretty serious, and that's why we're doing the special report tonight.
People who are familiar with the Dark Journalist Show certainly understand that I've covered the JFK assassination from day one on this show.
And what I can tell you about it is that it's still the crucial, hardcore wall of secrecy piece because the UFO piece with the CIA moving into that and Trying to covert,
you know, just adopt the UFO file using phony puppets like the TTSA organization to move out their guys like Elizondo, who remember is John Brennan, the Drone King's lieutenant.
He's one of his guys.
We can't forget where these people come from.
And that's why when we see in independent circles, we see guys like who were previously very well respected authors and all the rest of it, like George Knapp and others.
And I even heard Richard Dolan singing Elizondo's praises, which is a shock to me because.
Dolan knows so much about the CIA that how can you sit there and chum up to Luis Elizondo?
That doesn't make any sense.
So I think what's happening here is the CIA is moving their levers of persuasion and power, and they should be kicked out of organizations dealing with the UFO subject.
They shouldn't be allowed in because of their incredible track record of lying.
Let's not forget the WMDs in Iraq, which cost us how many years and how much money and how many lives?
So, no, I think we're looking.
At the need of a real awareness campaign around the intelligence agencies and the impact they're having, and the fact that they're having this impact, this incredibly degenerate impact on the Trump administration in blocking the JFK records, I think can be kind of a rallying cry for us to all wake up around their influence right now.
And with that, I will go to Olivia.
And I know I had a lot on my mind tonight, but I'm really glad that we're all here together to work it out.
Okay, so let's start.
I didn't actually copy this question down, but someone was asking: sometimes do you get so angry that you want to cry?
Isn't that interesting?
Well, I try not to get angry because I think that anger is something that can throw you off your center.
So it's not my first choice to get angry, but I do understand the great temptation for anger in relation to these subjects.
Great questions coming in right now.
So I'm going to ask it.
Go for it.
Pushing Back The Deep State00:09:28
I don't know how to pronounce this.
Max W L Y L E.
I always call Max Little.
Okay.
Well, how do we get rid of the deep state?
I don't think you can get rid of the deep state.
I think that you can push them back beyond their bounds into some kind of coexistence.
I think as long as you have out of control, unchecked power, that you'll be dealing with them and you'll always have to keep an eye on them.
It's kind of like saying, How do I get rid of sharks in the ocean?
You can't do it, but you can.
Organize a way not to get eaten by the sharks.
And that's how I view the deep state.
Count Roxo, since the US and Russia cooperate in space, do you think all geopolitical tension is fake news theater?
Well, it's interesting.
No, is the answer.
I do think, you know, what's unusual, and Olivia and I were discussing this earlier about how there are all these major corporations, including IBM.
And others supplying the Nazis with all these parts.
We had these guys fighting the Battle of the Bulge and all this, and we were selling the Nazis metal for screws and hammers and all the rest of it to make wheels for tanks.
So these corporations make money no matter what and with their allegiances, and they love war because they always make a profit.
But in terms of real decisions and some of the real tensions that we see with the United States and Russia right now, they're incredibly dangerous.
And the way that The alternative media, we already know the mainstream media is going to just tell us some lie about Russia being evil.
But the alternative media has a responsibility not to use phony ploys like, oh, it's 40 chess.
How cool is that?
Putin and Trump are giving a high five behind the scenes.
No, it's dangerous.
When you bomb a country like Syria that has Russian personnel, you run the risk of bombing their stations and having World War III on your hands.
Wake up, kids.
So, I think it's very important that the independent alternative side wake up, or people will leave them behind too and say, Well, you know what?
You were in your own weird fantasy about Trump playing 4D chess, and now we're in World War III.
So, I think the more adult responsible way to approach things is to say, You know, when you do an action, when the leader of our country takes an action, when the president says, I'm ordering a missile strike, he has the entire responsibility.
He's the responsible officer of the government.
So, I feel like it's certainly legit to point out that the corporations will do things out of the country's interests.
But in terms of the country actors, I don't think that that's fake news at all.
And I think it's very dangerous.
Ret Boy Genius, can legal cases be made against certain leaders of the CIA and nefarious corporations to bring them up on trials of treason?
Yes.
Well,.
Actually, one of the scariest parts of my learning from Professor Scott and speaking with him for hours is that actually there's a strange little clause in the National Security Act that basically says the CIA can't be prosecuted for anything, which is pretty scary when you think about it.
However, we do have intelligence oversight committees that, if they were given more powers, If they were given the ability to actually keep the CIA in line, if they weren't so compromised by them.
And this is another thing we need to talk about, which is this concept of control files.
So, you know, we all know about J. Edgar Hoover and what he would do is, you know, he would get compromising pictures of these senators in different situations.
And then he'd send someone to knock on the senator's door and say, oh, by the way, you know, we know that you were with such and such a person.
And if they try to blackmail you, don't worry, we'll be on your side.
And then they would come around again and say, by the way, when this war appropriations thing comes up, you're going to vote with us, right?
You know, like.
You're going to give us the ability to wiretap citizens and things like that.
And then these people be blackmailed into these situations because if they came out, it's like a Stormy Daniels type situation.
If you come out and people have this background on you, it dents your image a little bit with the public.
Well, that stuff still works, unfortunately.
And the compromises that they have on a lot of these people be pretty hardcore material.
So there is that.
But I think ultimately, there's a possibility of certainly strengthening the intelligence oversight committees.
And then, if they found wrongdoing, they could bring up legal action.
What else do you have?
Manjai Cicada.
Why doesn't Russia reveal what they know about the JFK assassination?
Well, the question comes up a lot.
It's a good point.
It's a good point.
Certainly, it's very sticky.
They know a lot about the JFK assassination and 9 11 because they have incredible intelligence on the ground.
They have at times revealed pieces, bits and pieces of it.
And Gorbachev actually talked a little bit about.
The fact that there had been extensive KGB studies done on the JFK assassination.
But I do think that, you know, he brought it up, interestingly enough, last year.
He said, well, you know, we know what happened when Kennedy challenged the CIA.
We know what happened to him.
This is Putin who brought that up.
So I do think it's fascinating.
They certainly still have some cards to play if things got bad enough.
And I would far prefer for our own leaders to come forward with that information so that we wouldn't be embarrassed on a world stage because.
You know, in the final analysis, we want the United States to be successful.
We want our country to do well.
And the best way to do that is to remove the wall of secrecy because the people who are operating the wall of secrecy don't have any ethics.
And that's a real problem.
No Name says that you were about to tell something important about John Connolly.
What was that?
No Name.
Nicely done.
Well, I do want to point this out.
Take a look at these two men for a second.
Clearly, President Trump and President Kennedy both had tremendous problems with the CIA.
We know how the CIA dealt with Kennedy.
We'll see if Trump's move to appease the CIA is going to do him any good.
I doubt it.
But let's look at a couple of interesting things in relation to that.
One, people who've been watching the X series may have gotten a glimpse of some of these, but since we have JFK as the topic, This picture.
Now that shows clearly President Trump.
This is 1987.
Former President Nixon, Trump's wife at the time.
And in the middle is John Connolly, who was, as we know, in the assassination car with JFK when he was killed.
And the fact that the three of these people got together in 1987.
And I have this letter here, which I've shown a few times.
This is Nixon telling Donald Trump to run for president and that if he does, he'll win.
Some of these connections are important because I think that there's a lot of messaging in Trump showing up on the political scene with Nixon and Connolly, who are fundamentally both representatives of being screwed over by the CIA.
Because Trump standing next to Connolly, I think, is significant.
And if you know politics very well, you know that there's a lot of posturing and a lot of significance that goes on.
And the idea of Nixon saying, Trump, you should run for president, being Nixon's pick with Connolly as right in the center there, tells me that this is Nixon saying, Trump is onto your game, referring to the intelligence agencies.
And I honestly wonder the more I've gone deeper into this, of course, we talked extensively about the time capsule in my series with Robert Merritt and Nixon hiding a time capsule in the White House.
But I honestly wonder how much advice and just.
How many details Nixon gave to Trump in relation to the real governance structure of the American political scene?
And I wouldn't be surprised if that's how he got into office in the first place.
But yes, thank you for catching that.
Okay, what else you got?
Jane Jones wants to know how much more sophisticated and dangerous is the deep state today?
Oh, far more dangerous.
Yeah, far more dangerous.
Nixon Advice To Trump00:15:25
They have more technology at their disposal.
It's my deep belief that the.
X technology, which is represented in the UFO file that's been traveling through these government agencies, is a big piece that they've developed.
And I would definitely say that on a technological level, they're about 50 years ahead of us technologically.
And that means, you know, there's all sorts of technologies that we find out about later and after the fact.
And if we could imagine that they can, you know, take a picture in a parking.
Garage underground with the kind of satellite control that they have, and they can tune into anybody's conversation, especially if we have technology like this with us.
We have to look at them in a whole different way than they looked at them, say, in the 1960s when they had like wiretapping and they would intercept mail and things like that.
Well, they've grown so dramatically.
And I feel like the NSA is in lockstep, and that things like Bluffdale, for example, where they gobble up and vacuum up all of our phone calls and emails and things like that are highly unconstitutional.
You know, facilities.
And so I think the deep state probably is more dangerous now than ever.
Each of them wants to know is it possible to repeal the Patriot Act?
Yes, and I think that we should.
You know, Professor Scott points out that as a result of the Patriot Act, we're in a constant state of emergency since 9 11, and that we're still in a state of emergency.
So we're operating under.
Continuity of government roles.
And the continuity of government roles apply to major emergency situations.
So they're in a constant flow like that.
So when someone like Catherine Austin Fitz and Professor Mark Skidmore come forward and say, well, there's $21 trillion missing from DOD and HUD, and they've done comprehensive studies on it, we should be asking ourselves, how are they getting away with hiding that kind of money?
And it's clearly through operating through the black budget of the Patriot Act where you can do things off the books.
So, it should be a major goal to recover the $21 trillion that the government has stolen out of thin air and also, or may disappear or went down some weird black hole, and to completely get rid of the emergency setting in the Patriot Act, which I think were set up under false pretenses.
Okay.
Hugh Hoyland, does the deep state have a connection or contact with ETs?
Let's get into the heart of it.
Yeah, that's interesting.
I don't think that they would need to with the advanced connections that they have here on Earth are quite powerful enough to have them sustain the situation.
Now, I do feel that aspects of the deep state, like the CIA, are deep into the UFO file and deep into it.
You know, we know that President Nixon, when he was vice president, was part of the CIA Project Blue Book that was working on reverse engineering the UFO file technology.
And all the ex steganography tells us that that activity continued right up to the present day in companies like Boeing and all the rest of it.
So I wouldn't rule it out.
But they don't need it.
I don't think that they would need it to have the kind of control that they have.
Bruce Wayne, does Trump know who killed JFK?
I think he has a pretty good idea.
And I did an interview with Roger Stone on the LBJ CIA connection in the death of JFK, which is something he wrote quite well about.
And what I found out is that he was highly encouraged by Trump to write that book, along with a book on the Bushes.
So I don't think Trump has any illusions about this American system and who the players are.
But I do doubt a little bit his ability, or not his ability, he certainly has the ability, but his determination to kind of go after that situation politically and balance it out.
I think it would be kind of amazing if he came in with all the knowledge that he had and wanted to do something about this.
But it is interesting because Stone certainly knows a great deal.
I can tell you from my conversations with him that he's incredibly well versed on the JFK assassination.
And we know he had Trump's ear, especially during the campaign and before that.
Lion of Judea says, So what does Daniel think is in there then?
And someone else was saying, Yeah, what would these files reveal that we don't already know?
Oh, without question, they can reveal a number of things.
For example, the last set of records that came out in October revealed that the mayor of Dallas was a CIA asset.
Well, we never knew that.
That makes a lot more sense considering he helped develop the motorcade route, and that would have made it a lot easier to get Kennedy assassinated in Texas.
So there are details like that that I think are significant.
For example, there was some information that a UK newspaper came forward with.
It was a very popular reporter there.
And he got a call 25 minutes before the assassination happened saying it's going to be big news from America.
Keep your eye on the US Embassy in London.
And 25 minutes later, they announced that JFK was assassinated.
So someone knew 25 minutes beforehand and called this English newspaper with an American accent.
So we have to wonder you know, these types of connections give us the picture.
And what could be still remaining in these records.
Are the details relating to Garrison's investigation of the aerospace industries and the efforts to thwart Garrison's investigation, which we know from a number of CIA sources came forward after the fact and said that their superiors were trying to subvert Jim Garrison's efforts getting at Clay Shaw?
And the whole trial in New Orleans around JFK's assassination that Garrison was putting on.
The CIA blocked over and over again, including trying to extradite people.
And at one point, Garrison tried to put Alan Dulles on the stand, and they just sort of ripped up his subpoena on that and said, you know, the government refuses to cooperate with that.
So there's certainly information in those files that could help connect some dots from some of the deeper researchers, people like Jefferson Morley, the ex Washington Post reporter, people like Professor Peter Dale Scott, who at age 88 is still.
Studying these things, and I'll tell you, is sharper than most of us half his age.
Okay.
Can you address?
There's kind of a debate going on about them postponing this because Poppy Bush is still alive.
Yeah.
Yeah, I think it's interesting.
Well, look, Bush, there's a book called Family of Secrets that Russ Baker did about the Bushes and the incredible links to the assassination that come up.
And I'll just give you one.
Now, this one is particularly important.
When Oswald gets back to Texas from the Soviet Union, he's adopted basically by George de Mornchilt.
And de Mornchilt is an oil geologist who, in that community, you've got the Hunts, you've got the Bushes, and just a few other people who do oil and oil geology.
So certainly, de Mornchilt became friends with Bush.
Now, they're admitted friends on the record.
And so, de Mornchilt, after he gives this testimony about Oswald, He kind of feels bad for him and he says, Well, you know, I think that they've really painted him as something that it wasn't.
And so after the case closed, you know, Warren Commission says it's all done.
DeMar Schild starts to have weird misgivings and he gives some interviews where he gives hints that, you know, his friends at the CIA were telling him to watch Oswald.
So, and he also says, Oswald, I considered almost like a son and he was an incredibly honest person and he was very decent and all these weird things.
And People are wondering, wait a minute, isn't he talking about the assassin of the president?
What's going on here?
And they're getting the idea that Oswald was actually an undercover agent for the government who was supposed to be penetrating an assassination ring, and that they used this against Oswald and caused him to appear to be this lunatic communist assassin.
Now, what happens is, DeMar Schilt writes his old friend, who's now CIA director, George Bush, who's soon to be the vice president and then the president, and of course, the father of the president who takes us into the Iraq war.
And he says to him, Look, I'm surrounded by all these weird people.
I try to write this thing about Oswald, and stupidly, I guess a lot of people got pissed off at me.
And so now my phone is bugged.
There are people following me.
Can you get us out of this incredibly bad situation?
And Bush doesn't respond to the letter.
And what he does, he realizes that the people who took the letter know that it came to Bush.
So there's no way to hide the letter, it becomes part of the archives.
That's why we have it in the first place.
But the fact that he would write to Bush shows that friendship.
And so Bush was very close.
Let's keep this in mind to the person who was shepherding Oswald around, who was a millionaire, by the way, DeMoren Schilt, and Oswald worked for $1.25 an hour.
So, why is DeMoren Schilt hanging out with this slacker, Lee Harvey Oswald?
It's pretty unusual.
And then the fact that he's best friends with George Bush, or at least a close friend and an oil geologist, I mean, it's off the charts.
So, these are the types of connections that we see in relation to Bush and the JFK assassination.
There's a lot of them.
And Bush was very deep with the CIA.
And if we think then that the CIA assassinated and then covered up the assassination, and that Bush was a deep player in the CIA, it's not that much of a stretch.
So then, do you think that the records will be revealed after he dies?
No, I think that they have a standing order to kind of clear people of Bush's stature in relation to these things.
And they don't like to throw people under the bus unless they have to, because it might reflect bad on them and what they're doing.
But I do think that it's possible, for example, that there might be records pertaining to Bush's CIA activities that we don't know about in those records.
There's an interesting record that Hoover talks about.
He's mentioning this, and he says, Oh, yes, we have to get this to our man in the CIA, George Bush.
The only problem with that document is it's 1962.
And Bush didn't take over as CIA director until 76.
Now, we know through the 50s that Bush had a close relationship with the CIA.
Bush came out of skull and bones.
Jesus Angleton comes out of skull and bones.
Zapata Oil Company is what Bush runs.
Zapata is the codename for the Bay of Pigs operation.
I mean, the links for Bush and the CIA are just a multitude, they're undeniable.
But I would say that direct knowledge.
Connecting Bush directly.
What's always been unusual about Bush in relation to the JFK assassination is unlike almost every other human being on the planet at that time, he claims to not know where he was.
Now, that's very strange, and it can only mean it's certainly not a lapse of memory.
That's ridiculous.
He certainly remembered it, but wherever it was, he didn't want to put it on the record.
And I've always found that unusual.
What else you got?
Eleanor Keller Did JFK have any idea that he might be killed?
And of course he did.
Yes.
Yes.
JFK was very aware of the dangers that were involved in taking on the CIA.
I think he felt like he had to do it and that he was fulfilling this position.
Remember, he had faced a nuclear war and facing down Khrushchev, and I think that changed him dramatically.
So when he went to speak at American University, the State Department thought he had a certain speech and he pulled out a different one.
And that's the one where he talked about.
You know, we all have to inhabit this planet.
We have to reexamine the way we look at the Russians.
We're all mortal.
And we have to think about how we build a society.
And we can't afford to have a nuclear war where even the fruits of victory would be ashes in our mouths.
I think this is quite important.
It shows a lot of his perspective.
And of course, Gene Dixon made a prediction, right?
Yes, Gene Dixon, who, by the way, features heavily in tomorrow night's X Report.
Believe it or not, Gene, I'm telling you, I think this is the most powerful woman in history.
For a certain period of time, and I'll prove it.
And Florida.
Yes, there was an earlier attempt.
Well, there are multiple in Chicago also.
If you look up a guy named Thomas Vallee, V A L L E E, he was found on Kennedy's motorcade route in Chicago with all these weapons in his trunk.
And you know what?
He was an ex Marine and he had all these different leanings.
They were going to use him the way that they used Oswald.
They just couldn't really pull it off in Chicago.
It was close because it was corrupt enough at the time.
But Dallas was much better because LBJ would be in charge and he'd be able to use people like Dryhole Bird.
And the Texas School Book Depository, and then they'd have the mayor, who's a CIA asset.
It was a really, it was a perfect setup.
And sometime, if you even study the Masonic trappings of Dealey Plaza, which I know is kind of maybe a deeper level of looking at it, but some of those representations I think are quite fascinating.
There is an occult aspect to the JFK assassination, for sure.
Stephen Visible, have you heard about the JFK kill shot coming from the storm drain?
Yeah.
I've always thought that was fascinating because the storm drains, you literally could walk out of them and keep going, and then, you know, walk out into the water and get out into the woods.
And there's always been fascinating studies around that.
Occult JFK Assassination Aspects00:07:10
There's no question that the way that they set up the shot and the way they slowed down the car and everything, it was the perfect ambush zone.
So, really, you had a number of different opportunities.
To kill him, and certainly the weakest would have been from the schoolbook depository where this big tree in the way blocking your direction.
But it was perfect because, of course, you could stick Oswald in there with an old gun and pretend that he was the assassin later.
Remember that, um, Deputy Roger Craig, who was the first guy on the scene, along with another guy, uh, Seymour Weitzman, find a not a Mamluk or Carcano, they find a totally different kind of rifle, they find a 7.65 Mauser.
Uh, the way they really jogged the memory on it is you know, um, Weitzman is looking at Craig and he's like, you know, he runs a sporting goods store, he knows weapons inside and out.
And he says, Oh, look, it says 7.65 Mauser right there.
And he said, He held it up, you know, Craig saying, Well, he held it up to my face.
I put that in my documentary, Agent Oswald, which is on this channel, so you can view it.
And really, it does capture the CIA's role and the various links in the assassination, but certainly, um, Could there have been somebody shooting from the storm drain?
Yeah, absolutely.
Definitely, people heard sounds from the right of the motorcade as it was coming down.
So, you know, they call it that grassy knoll area, that whole bit.
That's where the major shooting took place.
No question.
Jack Russell, the people who are responsible for JFK are dead.
What does DJ hope to gain from exposing these actors?
Well, you have to kind of gain transparency by exposing.
Historical actions.
So, if we can find out the motivations of the people involved and we can find out who it was, then yes, you're right.
I mean, you can't really take them to court now.
I mean, but in the court of public opinion, you can help people to understand what those forces were.
And certainly, it can provide a huge deterrent for people who are planning that type of activity now.
It might even expose the current deep state, which is why they're bending over backwards to get this guy.
Trump here, who's going to become president and is president now, to say, hey, listen, hold on to those records until 2021, which is a year after my election.
Maybe he's saying, you can't use anything against me until I get elected or I'll let your secrets out.
But I wouldn't play gamesmanship.
That would be the advice I would give to Trump.
I would say, just use your cards now.
This is what Garrison actually said to Bobby Kennedy, interestingly enough, because.
Bobby Kennedy had worked against Garrison's investigation because he felt that it might uncover things that would be spun by the media to show that instead of the CIA being up to assassinating Castro, it might show the Kennedys in a bad light.
But shortly before he died, they did get in touch and they started writing letters back and forth.
And Garrison did say to him, look, do not take the chance, you know, because if you put it out there, If you say, I do think the CIA had a role in this, if you do say that there's pressure, then they'll take a good long look before they take a shot at you and try to remove you from the scene and really take you out.
And Bobby Kennedy responded to him saying, I know there's a number of guns between here and the White House.
So he knew what they were up to.
But certainly, yeah, that's something to consider.
Carlos Aliaga.
The CIA won't release those records by the same reason that Howard Hunt said why Kennedy had to go.
The CIA will not let the world know the high alien tech re engineering that's going on in Pine Gap, Australia.
Yeah, absolutely.
Well, we've been exposing Pine Gap in the past few episodes, and I want people to really get with this because I think the advanced stuff, the X technologies, have been taken largely into Pine Gap.
And I think that Area 51 and things like that are more.
A mythological kind of punchline now.
But Pine Gap is just the kind of facility that's totally American controlled, even though it's run on Australian soil.
And if we looked back into the case of Gough Whitlam, who got removed in 1975 under this extraordinary constitutional crisis, and he was removed because he wanted to get rid of Pine Gap, and they could not afford to do that.
Pine Gap, right now, is the world's most sophisticated listening station for the spy activity.
For how we want to listen in on foreign governments.
It's an incredible station for that, but my suggestion is that it's a much deeper kind of technology that they're working on, and a lot of it has to do with the UFO file.
Joel Shields, JFK, RFK, Mary Pinchot Meyer, and Dorothy Kilgallen, all or in part killed by the CIA?
Yeah, I've got the last two, Dorothy Kilgallen and Mary Meyer.
Who were the first two?
JFK and RFK.
Oh, yes, absolutely.
Yeah.
No, I mean, that's interesting too because Mary Meyer was Cord Meyer's wife, and Cord Meyer was one of the top CIA agents.
And it was E. Howard Hunt on his deathbed confession who said that Cord Meyer was responsible for setting up LBJ working with Cord Meyer to get the assassination done.
And Mary Meyer is assassinated there in early 1964.
But even before that, there's a famous story of Ben Bradley, who was married.
He's the editor of the Washington Post, who was married to Mary Meyer and Mary Meyer's sister.
And after her death, they go directly to her house and they find Jesus James Angleton, who's the head of the CIA counterintelligence wing, and he is whipping through her house looking for her diary.
So that gives you some indication of what was going on there.
There's a great book called Mary's Mosaic by Peter Janney that shows his dad's involvement in the JFK assassination along with Cord Myers.
So, yeah, it's an important book.
Fuberfighter, what gives the CIA the right to decide what is a vital national security secret?
Well, ordinarily, the way that they were set up, National Security Act, you know, there's a series of recommendations to the president, and he's supposed to adopt them or not adopt them.
Constitutional Convention Threats00:09:32
And so they can come up with a variety of reasons.
They can say, well, this will expose sources and methods, this will expose our agent in the field, whatever it happens to be.
They can use excuses inside and out.
And unless you're just all over it, that you know all the details in and out, it's very hard to weigh it out.
So it is a tricky position.
But Trump, with his knowledge and information, knows that a case that took place 55 years ago, that if you let the files out, it doesn't pose any danger because the countries involved, most of the people involved are dead, as somebody else pointed out.
And the countries involved, some of them don't even exist anymore.
So, no, aside from just historically, it might give us.
You know, kind of a bloody nose because when you look back on it, if it was revealed that we were doing these things and trying to unseat these other leaders, so much of this is out already.
But that's it.
You know, that's the transparency side.
The thing that they're hiding is much deeper.
And this is the problem.
And maybe it could even lead to some of the X technology stuff that we've been talking about, but certainly it would lead to the deep state role of the CIA relating to the assassination.
I think that's what they're really most disturbed about.
Wolf picks for clicks.
If the MSN is usually liberal, why would they frequently side with the deep state?
I want to follow up.
And Lee Velpin answers that question.
Mockingbird mainstream media keeps the masses dumbed down.
Yep.
What do you think?
Oh, there's no right and left when it comes to the deep state.
Not at all.
The deep state operates with both of them.
And the right wing, left wing thing is, you know, kind of managing one side of the.
Fence and managing one side of the interest.
You know, some people like romantic movies, some people like action movies.
You know, there's just different stripes of things, but the deep state doesn't play favorites in terms of parties at all.
They'll go, you know, just like you see Lindsey Graham and John McCain, you know, always angling for war as Republicans.
And on the other side, we were looking at Hillary Clinton bombing Libya and doing all, you know, with Obama.
Obama was bombing seven countries.
Nobel, uh, Peace Prize winner.
I mean, you know, some of that stuff is just ridiculous.
So, no, unfortunately, you know, when you hear these liberals now, it's pretty hilarious, in fact, because we've got these liberals out there saying, oh, Russia is so terrible.
And, you know, we really need to take them on.
And, you know, you're a Russian agent if you don't, you know, you're with the Kremlin if you believe in the stuff.
It's like a weird mind reversal because that's the kind of stuff the Republicans would use against those red leaning communist Democrats.
Even 20 or 30 years ago.
So it's so weird.
It's like the 1984 thing.
We are at war with Oceania and we've always been at war with Oceania.
Don't forget it.
Jolie, one.
It seems the 1947 Security Act is so problematic.
What can be done to repeal it?
Oh, it's a great point.
The main problem with it is it created a corridor of power and financial secrecy.
And that's the way they've been able to get away with all this because you need to fund it all.
But we thought, well, Truman thought in setting this up hey, this is what we'll do.
We'll set it up so people can't track where our military programs are going and what we're supporting and all the rest of it.
But unfortunately, the people who control the secrecy have made kind of a deal with the devil there, which is they've decided what's important and what we should know.
And the society's been left behind further and further.
So you have a very schizophrenic situation where you have this top level that knows everything.
And they make decisions and make moves depending on their interests.
And then we're left on the ground thinking, what's going on here?
What's with all these school shootings?
What's with all the serious stuff?
What's with the financial coup d'etat?
What's with 9 11?
And the situation gets a little bit.
Where we're so out of sync with each other that they're operating on one level and they're operating behind a wall of secrecy.
And if we don't penetrate the wall of secrecy, then it runs the risk of destroying the society involved.
And in that case, it's us.
I mean, we can point to other societies where this is happening also, but it's particularly dangerous, I would say, in the case of America right now, which is what we're doing here.
MHG in Tennessee, how much did JFK's use of LSD influence his shift to nationalism slash constitution?
Well, this is all rumored because we were talking about Mary Pinchot Meyer.
And Mary Meyer had separated from Cord Meyer and was always enamored of JFK.
And they had an affair.
And she really wanted to change him.
Now, she was an advocate of LSD along with Timothy Leary.
And she smoked pot and she was a free thinking artist and all the rest of it.
And it said that she had the influence on JFK to have him try LSD, which was legal in those days.
And that he did gain insights from doing that once with her.
It's not something that we know directly out of a diary or something else.
It's a word of mouth thing.
And maybe it happened, maybe it didn't.
But I can imagine if it did happen, then it was probably pretty remarkable.
And if they were aware of it, the people in the deep state, they might have thought, this is a good thing to use against him.
Jane Jones has a great question Do other countries have a deeper deep state?
And which world government has the deepest deep state?
Well, it's a good point because we are talking about the American deep state, and that reaches into tentacles, you know, out into these other countries, whether you're talking China, of course, in Russian, you have the Russian mafia.
And, you know, so there are these connections, but I have to say that the hardcore deep state that is really showing control is based in the U.S., it's based in that U.S.-U.K. axis.
And back and forth together, I think we have the The biggest share of what that would be.
But I think that they integrate with everything from arms dealers in the Middle East to drug dealers in Afghanistan to corporate raiders and corporate developers in China.
So it moves around the globe, there's no question.
But I think you're going to find the heart of it, the apex of it, is in the United States.
By the way, it's not all united.
And there is a portion of it that's with.
Trump and a portion, a larger portion that's against him.
Soft Alloy 07.
Yes.
Who's so brilliant to me.
Can the American citizen maintain the Constitution?
Isn't this what the JFK assassination is really all about?
Well, I think the Constitution is under threat right now.
And according to Catherine Austin Fitz and her work, it's about to come under serious threat when they try to do a constitutional convention.
A constitutional convention is something that needs to be ratified by a certain amount of states, and they're getting there very closely.
And in her opinion, what they specifically want to do is strike down the Second Amendment protections and they want to crack down on free speech.
So, looking at that situation and always knowing that Fitz is always years ahead of everybody else, I believe that the constitutional situation is what everything is about because the Constitution is the only thing that stands between us and total corporate governance.
And their idea is just developing a power grid.
And we know how they operate, right?
In China, for example, Apple has their guys work overtime and they don't offer them counseling or whatever.
What they do offer them is suicide nets if they get so depressed they want to jump out a window from working so much.
That's the way the corporations think.
And boy, once they get the robots to replace us, then they won't think about us at all.
It's a very dangerous situation.
The technocracy that is developing, people like Bezos and the Davos crowd, that is a real split in society.
And it's the thing we need to be most aware of because we have the most power.
In relation to this, because it's very easy for us as consumers to say, we're willing to work with your technology to this point, but when you start replacing people, when you have driverless cars that run people down, and when you get into these situations, then that's a different story and we're going to stop you politically.
And we can.
We do have the power to do that.
Remember, the corporations only think about us as another zone.
We're the North American zone, that's where they can sell products.
They do not think in terms of sovereign governments, they just think in terms of corporate.
Power control zones.
That's an old Bilderberg thesis.
That is the thesis of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission.
This is the way they look at the world.
It's a very Rockefeller influence worldview, and it's extremely dangerous for everyone.
Cappy go lucky.
World War III Scenarios00:05:33
How similar is Trump's presidency to the early Kennedy presidency in its conflict with the deep state?
There's no question that it is.
It has been.
There is some caving in that's going on right now with him getting aggressive towards Syria and blocking the JFK records.
It's very disturbing because it puts him more in a kind of the Obama style role.
And if it goes further, it'll put him in a Bush role and he'll just be some accident of history instead of a great president, which he has the opportunity to be.
Trump came in and said, Look, we're going to do things America first.
And that shook up all of the corporate rule people.
And then he said, We're going to have borders.
And that shook up all the drug running.
Intelligence operations.
So, right there, he was really messing with the situation.
Kennedy, when he came in, he said, You know, we're going to cooperate with other nations.
And the CIA was like, Oh, wait, you know, let's force the Bay of Pigs on him and make him deal with that and then make him deal with the invasion.
And they forced that on him very early in his administration.
It was actually in April, and he just got in in January.
And it was a plan that was left over from the Eisenhower administration.
So, they wanted to force him into that.
And so after that, he said, How could I ever do that?
How could I take their word for anything?
And he fired them.
He fired Dulles, who was a real canard, you know, and he was the holy cow of the intelligence.
And they say that when he fired him, Dulles continued to be in an intelligence role, just not officially, and that he was working behind the scenes, regardless of if Kennedy had fired him and got rid of him or not.
So I think it is fascinating.
Both of these guys, certainly Kennedy realized it, and he spent the entire presidency trying to rein in the CIA and get the presidential powers back.
Under the umbrella of the Oval Office.
Trump has no doubt struggled with it as well.
Trump didn't understand the political spectrum as much as Kennedy did, but he was no neophyte because he had people like Nixon and Roy Cohn as tutors, and those are some of the deepest players in American politics.
I'm going to connect two questions.
Lawrence Henney says Trump has tried to keep the promises of his election, but faces a very determined enemy intent on its survival.
Which threatens to jail and assassinate him 24 hours a day.
True.
Another person brought up Ross Perot in that context.
Yes.
And Bokrils says, okay, Daniel, I love your channel, but explain to me if Trump didn't bomb those sites and he did absolutely nothing, tell me what would have happened if he did absolutely nothing.
Please tell me.
Well, you should do absolutely nothing because if the sites are from the Syrian government and the Syrian government didn't, there's no proof the Syrian government did the chemical attack, then.
It's like, you know, somebody stealing your car and then you bombing your neighbor's house.
I mean, if there's no proof that they did it, what are you bombing them for?
So, no, there was no justification for it.
There was no time.
There was no evidence that came back.
There was no evidence that was presented.
It just felt good because you said, hey, France is with us.
We're both going to bomb them.
I don't doubt that Syria's been a real pain in the neck, but here's the thing the Syrian government has its own sovereign situation.
We've been trying to unseat their leaders since 2012.
Why?
Why are we after Assad?
Really ask yourself the question.
Okay, there's a civil war there.
Things get ugly.
All right.
But we've now raised that place to the ground between us, the civil war, the weird ISIS thing, which nobody's really explained where their funding comes from.
Where are they getting all their money?
How are they running tanks and stuff?
They're supposed to be just, you know, a ragtag group.
Mercenary group, where are they getting who's funding them?
How are they taking over cities?
You know, you can't just show up and do that because you've got a lot of attitude.
You've got to have technological backing, payrolls, money, tanks, weapons.
Who's giving it to them?
It's pretty easy to shut off ISIS, just find out who's giving them the stuff or who is it that's giving it to them.
That's the key question.
As Catherine Austin Fitz would say, Is it Mr. Global himself?
Somebody's given them that.
So, no, the actions in Syria were completely unjust on behalf of the United States government.
There was no reason to bomb Assad.
As a matter of fact, a week before, Trump had said, I have no interest in keeping troops in there.
I want to pull them out.
And then a week later, he bombs them.
This chemical attack thing, you know, it would be the most stupid thing for Assad to do to use chemical weapons against his enemies in a civil war that he's winning.
Because it would draw international attention and destabilize his position.
It doesn't make any sense for anyone logically looking at it.
And for our country to just bomb them and then tweet, here come shiny weapons, or something like that, it's a disaster.
It's an absolute disaster.
And the message that it sends really to Russia is that we're reckless over here.
NSA And Palantir Control00:02:38
And it's not 4D chess.
And forget about Q and all that nonsense and those people playing out those dumb scenarios.
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life.
It's a country bombing another country.
There's no 4D chess, there's no high fives and none of that junk.
And they're not bombing deep state sites.
Jesus.
We see the most ridiculous things.
Let's get real.
They're bombing Syrian sites.
Syria is a sovereign government supported by Russia.
That's a World War III scenario.
So at least let's get real on it.
Okay, let's lighten up a little bit.
Jesper Bradley, why do all the world powers disagree on everything except the Antarctica Treaty?
I don't know.
I don't think that they agree on everything.
But I think that the secrecy around the UFO file is something that countries would try to use as leverage over us.
And it's probably partial, parts of the reasons for the secrecy that we've adopted around it.
But since the information is going to come out about the X technologies, At some point, the more that it's delayed, I think the trickier the terrain is.
So there are some, yes, there are some things that the global communities collaborate on, but certainly not everything.
Line of Judea, why move Intel from NSA to Palantir?
Well, the way that I would look at that, I mean, my feeling is that most of what we're looking at with the NSA situation, we're looking at, there's one group over here which Is controlling major intelligence operations like the CIA.
There's another group over here that came out of that developing the NSA, and the NSA got a technological edge and started to create more power and position.
And that's where the Snowden thing came from because people inside the CIA wanted to knock down the NSA by showing that they were illegally eavesdropping on regular citizens.
So we get into kind of an interesting switch there.
And then you have the National Intelligence Director.
Who's supposed to control all of them, but it seems like he doesn't have as much power after all as the CIA director does.
So I think that those intelligence organizations do have a lot of sparring that's going on.
Okay.
Five Investigations Delayed00:04:09
Bo Krills also asked Bobby Ray Inman is huge in the alien UFO area.
Yep.
And he was the NSA director and deputy director for the CIA simultaneously?
Afterwards.
Okay.
Yeah.
He was both, though.
He's done both.
There he is with George Joannidis.
And Joannidis, of course, ran the.
So Inman's running the UFO file, and Joannidis is running the JFK assassination cover up file for the House Intelligence Committee.
I should round this out by saying that there were five investigations.
I pointed out the Warren Commission was the official version, and that had Dulles at the helm for the CIA.
That's why you've got the ridiculous Oswald story and the magic bullet and all that.
The Garrison investigation, his conclusion, it was members of the aerospace part of the military industrial complex who caused it.
That's specifically interesting because Garrison kept running into those leads.
Whenever he would track down Oswald, he always ran into NASA.
The third investigation of note would be the church committee.
And the church committee got very far and deeper than anybody, really.
And they really threw out a lot of the CIA members, including Helms and James Jesus Angleton.
And there was a lot of movies around that period, like House of the Wings, Hours of the Condor, is that what it's called?
Three Days?
Three Days of the Condor.
That's it.
It's Robert Redford.
It's a fantastic movie.
And I do feel like that whole period was just alive with awareness around this.
And we kind of lost that.
Then we have the House Assassination Committee on Intelligence, and that's really a crucial turning point because what they decide after three years of going through all this testimony and all the rest of it, because the public really desires to know what happened to John F. Kennedy, they decide it was a probable conspiracy 95% and refer it to the Justice Department to take it up.
Reagan gets in, and Edwin May said the Justice Department has no interest in it, and that's it.
But then the JFK movie comes out, and it's Jim Garrison's story that reignites the entire situation.
And we realize all those records are held back.
And everyone knows that the story about JFK being assassinated by a lone nut is a joke.
And they also know that Oswald isn't some lone nut communist and that the whole setup of him being there on the motorcade route is absurd.
So those are the five different investigations.
That one, the JFK Records Assassination Act, spawns the Assassination Record Review Board, which is the ARRB, which is where we get the majority of the documents that we have relating to the JFK assassination today.
And they were the ones.
Who in 1992 said you have to release all of the JFK records in 25 years?
No ifs, ands, or buts.
And that's a law signed into law by Congress and Clinton.
So, unfortunately, when Trump got it on October 26th, he blocked it the first time.
We did the live presentation on that.
And we did the special afterwards, really breaking it down.
And those videos are still available back there to see what happened six months ago.
But then this is even worse because he gave them the six months.
He said, okay, now he's giving them till 2021.
And what they're going to do is try to delay it forever or get rid of whatever's in there.
So, yeah, it's a bad state of affairs.
Those five investigations, though, you can see this wending through history, this secret of the JFK assassination and the reason he was assassinated.
And let's not forget the words of E. Howard Hunt to Douglas Caddy, which came out in my program in 2015.
And Caddy, of course, is the great friend of E. Howard Hunt.
And E. Howard Hunt, before he went to prison for Watergate crimes, said Kennedy was assassinated because he was going to give away our most vital secret to the Russians.
And Caddy asked him, What's the most vital secret?
And Caddy said, The UFO file on the alien presence.
Secret Of JFK Assassination00:07:38
So this is something to consider in the larger picture of it, which is why would you really remove a president?
He could be in your way for a number of reasons, but you could undermine him.
But what is it that he could have that could really cause you to take your position?
I mean, he was hiccuping the system.
He was really changing the way that we operate.
He was really freedom oriented with the space program.
He was bringing the nation together.
He wanted cooperation with the Soviets.
He just had a different vision around what we could do with America and global freedom.
He was a very advanced thinker, he was pretty far ahead of his time.
And this idea that He would start sharing the UFO file of what we knew about it with the Russians.
Those operators in the deep state, that's the ultimate betrayal.
And they use that as the excuse to take them out because they want them out for all the other reasons.
That's a pretty good summation.
Okay, we'll take two more questions.
Okay, this is a great question.
And gummy bears, I really want to know who DJ thinks runs the world.
Well, it is the $64,000 question, isn't it?
I don't think it's any kind of someone.
And I don't think it's smart to isolate it to any particular group.
But certainly a small band of these groups.
Are consolidating power.
That much we can see even on the surface without going too much into speculation.
So the people who show up at Davos, the Davos crowd, and I recommended at the time when Trump went to see them, I said, I don't think the president should go.
I think his best card to play is to say, I'm not part of that group.
And instead, he went and he talked about nationalism and how to protect our borders and all the rest of it.
So, he does talk an America first game.
Let's see if he can stick with it because it's very important to break up this idea of worldwide corporations running everything.
The countries are important because America specifically has the Constitution, the Constitution being one of the greatest documents ever developed by mankind because it gives the basis of equality in citizenship, which is the fundamental basis that we've been looking for since the Greek societies and all the rest of it.
So, this is something that they've Gotten around, and you know, it's been very difficult for them, which is why Fitz, in her infinite wisdom, has suggested that the constitutional conventions that they've been calling for that they're working to ratify by 2019 are very dangerous because what they want to do is run a truck right through the constitutional protections on things like speech and the Second Amendment.
Okay, uh, Young 27R in Watergate, does DJ find it interesting that Liddy and Hunt get caught?
So called professional spies, and then force Nixon to resign.
Yes, I do.
Watergate's a deep state event, and Professor Scott points it out that way.
He also points out that many of the players involved in the JFK assassination, like Hunt and his sidekick, are also identified with the JFK assassination.
It's a very unusual situation, but here's what's interesting the continuity of government aspect is really the unexplored key.
To those types of deep events.
Whenever there's a deep event, the continuity of government players are there.
And the continuity of government player in the JFK assassination is Secret Service agent Winston Lawson, because he sets up the motorcade route.
And he is the person who is using the continuity of government communication system.
And there's no real good explanation for why he was using that emergency broadcast system.
And then John Dean.
When he goes to work for Nixon, his job just previously was working, helping to set up continuity of government.
And I've done a video on here called Continuity of Government Secret Space Program, and another one with Professor Peter Dale Scott called the Doomsday Network, which outlines exactly how the continuity of government system operates.
Okay, last question.
I'm going to give the, it's not really a question, but it's a comment that I think is provocative.
Yes.
Okay.
Unconscious Zone.
Says, I don't believe flat earthers actually exist since I've never had one look me in the eye and espouse their new religion.
That's interesting.
I, yeah.
It's only one line.
Yeah, I do feel like there's a lot of truth to that.
There are groups, there are representatives, and I'll tell you what's very strange about them.
They're often associated with white genocide movements.
Now, isn't that interesting?
So, a lot of the people who are the surface players who talk about flat earth stuff or put out materials in relation to it, or, you know, and they wind up being kind of part of that red ice movement.
Dialogue about white genocide and make it all a racial thing.
I thought that was pretty fascinating because when we get into it, it definitely has the ultimate throwback question, right?
Because you could call someone a flat earther, it means they're the ultimate moron if you think about it, because that's what the thing used to be when we moved out of the Middle Ages.
It's like, what are you, a flat earther, right?
So if you could adopt that into the alternative community and have them pick up on it.
Now, the only thing that I would say is that Vice, after they did a The piece with me the week following, uh, HBO Vice, we did the JFK assassination anniversary, and then a week later, they played, they showed up at the Flat Earth convention in I think it was like North Carolina or something.
And those people did seem like they were real people, so you might want to check that out.
But yes, wow, isn't that interesting?
Okay, you can keep going.
I'm gonna let Soft Alloy 07 have the final word here.
The Constitution cannot prevent sociopathic behavior from overtaking it.
No document can do that yet.
Well, the Constitution provides protections, and it seems like the way it was arranged, it has a kind of a steel to it.
And if you want to say that's almost like an etheric quality that goes beyond just what's written, I would say it's true that there's something in the actual words of it, the same way that when you say certain words, you know, certain concepts come from like the Magna Carta and these different.
Types of documents.
They have something beyond just human rationale.
There's kind of a spiritual backbone to them.
So, yes, it's about enforcing the words for sure, but there's no doubt the protections are listed there because the entire government is sworn to uphold the Constitution.
So, the Constitution is, in fact, the law of the land still as things stand.
So, anyone who acts against the Constitution is still acting against the law at this point.
That's an important provision.
Ellisburg has a good solution here.
We need to screen for ASPD before letting anyone get into positions of power.
Spiritual Backbone Documents00:06:38
It's not a bad idea.
It's discriminatory, but it's kind of a good idea.
Well, yeah, it'd be interesting to see.
Yeah.
The problem is that would be tricky to implement.
Let's put it that way.
I am running out of questions.
Good, good.
Listen, it's been a fantastic.
I'm going to open up one more.
There isn't a specific question, but there's been a lot of Q talk.
And, you know, I think it's going to happen that every show you're going to have to address the whole Q thing a little more elaborately.
I wonder if everyone would agree that I pretty much laid out what I thought about Q in this episode.
And I did an episode with Joseph Farrell on Q as a marketing op and Intel PsyOp combination thing as data mining operations.
There's no question that's what it was.
And this other thing is even flimsier than that.
It seems to be some weird call to arms and.
Distraction stuff.
They had a picture of Obama with a little girl now.
And, you know, it's really, they're really losing it.
And in the meantime, while saying, you know, they're not addressing the real thing about Trump bombing Syria and they're not addressing, for example, Trump blocking the release of the JFK records, Q is a useless thing.
It comes from a porn website, 4chan, which largely hosts pornography.
It's going to be the biggest joke in the world.
So, my feeling about it, too, is that the weird, rabid thing, you know, they know the people who are pulling the strings and manipulating that marketing operation know that.
In the alternative media, there's a deep reverence for Trump because he broke the gridlock of the Clintons and the Bushes by coming into office and breaking that media, mainstream media power grid.
And that's the same reason why I've pointed him out and lauded him for doing that.
But it's the same reason, him doing that, why I'm going to point out why bombing Syria is a bad idea and blocking the JFK records is a bad idea.
He's getting bad advice and he's surrounded by hawks now.
That's just not a good situation.
So, certainly, I think in relation to Q, though.
If you find someone who's smart, who's listening to Q, tell them that it's absurd that some anonymous poster on a porn site should be running a political movement.
What you want in this world is accountability, transparency, and a foundation of ethics.
You don't want somebody just taking pictures and saying, Look, I took a picture of the White House pen.
I'm Donald Trump's best friend.
In truth, if that person had done that, the Secret Service would pummel them and Remove them from the side of the president and say you can't use your camera around the president and then tweet it.
The alternative media has to be inspired to step up its game and be more intelligent about things and not run away with little waves of frenzies.
But in particular, Q is dangerous because look what just happened today.
Look at the JFK assassination thing and Trump really playing along with the CIA and blocking those records.
While everyone else is running over here saying, like, what is the Alice in Wonderland rabbit hole stuff that we can follow?
Real things are happening on the ground.
And, you know, so yeah, it's dangerous because it's a waste of time.
That would be my major objection to it.
And second, I think it's, you know, it's exploiting, it's exploitative.
It's kind of opium for the masses in a way.
What do you think we should be doing with our time if we were not paying attention to Q?
What would be a better use of our time?
Oh my God.
I mean, pick up a book by Peter Dale Scott.
You'll be so much more educated.
Q is nothing.
I mean, Q is like tic tac toe riddles, some of the worst content I've ever seen in my life.
So, no, I have no respect for any of that.
I wouldn't waste any of my time with it.
If somebody wants to play with it like a game and have fun with it, that's up to them.
But no, I think it's dangerous for all the reasons I outlined because it distracts you from what's actually going on.
And there's no reason for it.
You don't need a filter.
You can do, we do the alternative media.
You can.
Pick up different sources and combine things and know them yourself.
You don't need some weird anonymous poster.
You know, I called it the Wizard of Oz syndrome with that.
It's really, that's exactly the thing to avoid.
And we can do better.
We can definitely do better.
Someone was asking where you get your funding.
I get my funding from the people who view this program.
And it's a good point because what you can do is if you go to darkjournalist.com, the first thing to do is sign up for the free newsletter.
Because the newsletter keeps us in touch regardless of the social media platform.
So you always know when a show is coming.
And that's important because it gives us a direct pipeline.
While you're there, you can also support the show.
It's basically $4 a month.
And you get basically all the audio files, all the video files, and all the special stuff that we can do this year in particular.
We're going to make extra good for the people who have supported the show.
And it makes a difference because I always say get behind the shows.
You know, and get behind the things that are good for you and you're getting good information from.
So I always point out forbiddenknowledgetv.net, my friend Alexandra, who runs that.
Catherine Austin Fitz and Solari.com, Joseph Farrell, Giza Death Star.com, the Dark Journalist site, Cryptagon.com.
These are good sources of information by groups and people who want you to have a more successful, transparent version of reality.
And you get a better handle on things.
That's so valuable when you're surrounded by.
So much noise and so much junk.
And, you know, last week everyone was talking about Comey and, you know, Comey disses Trump and says he has small hands.
It's just, you know, Twitter and all that, you're not getting anything.
There's no value in it, there's no intellectual value.
Think of it in terms of food.
You know, when you sit down, you either get a happy meal, you know, or you get a fast food that'll kill you eventually, or you get something quality that where you get the right nutrients to think straight.
And hopefully this show, we do that with this show.
So, with that said, I appreciate all your questions.
Fascinating Record Releases00:01:37
Olivia, thank you.
Thank you, everybody.
You did an excellent job.
The JFK assassination records block is on.
They blocked them April 26, 2018.
And I'm here to object for you on your behalf because I think President Trump was wrong to block the records at the behest of the CIA.
And the CIA has real good reason for trying to hide those records.
What they're trying to hide, but I think we have a pretty good idea.
Tomorrow night we'll be back.
It'll be the X series part eight.
That's where we're going.
And that's going to be fascinating.
So don't miss it.
We'll start at 7 p.m.
And I look forward to seeing you all then.
Until then, it's great to have everyone here.
And I should do at least a shout out.
There's Christine Taggart.
It's great to see you.
And I am glad Heather Polly's out there.
Fantastic.
It was really great to see everybody out here.
I felt like even though I knew we had a big show coming up, I knew for a fact we had to do this show because this is the crucial stuff.
Why don't you give them a tidbit coming up tomorrow?
Well, tomorrow you're not going to want to miss it.
I'll put it to you that way.
And we're heading to Pine Gap to get some answers.