David Knight exposes the Trump Mobile scam, where 600,000 supporters lost $60 million in deposits for unshipped phones, framing it as a metaphor for broader frauds like the over-budget Reflecting Pool and Iran war costs. He argues government surveillance tools like Mobile Fortify and Palantir data enable tyranny against protesters while eroding property rights through eminent domain. The episode concludes by linking military spending to currency devaluation, urging listeners to hold physical gold against a financial system allegedly manipulated by foreign interests in the Kentucky congressional race. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Telling the Truth is Revolutionary00:14:55
Of deceit.
Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 12th of May, year of our Lord, 2026.
Well, today we're going to take a look at one scam after the other.
The Trump phone is one that we've not talked about.
We're going to talk about that today, but also you've got The reflecting pool, the ballroom, the war with Iran, these costs are multiplying, jumping by 50%, doubling, tripling as they go along.
He is running us into bankruptcy.
You know, we had War Pete say that he's going to run the Pentagon like a business.
Actually, he's going to run it like a casino.
He's going to run it like Trump's businesses that he bankrupted.
But it's all one big scam, isn't it?
It's all a lie.
Scam it.
As Audi would say.
And we're going to take a look also at the Peace Board, which we haven't spent a lot of time on.
I want to take a look at what a horrific, globalist, tyrannical structure of self worship this tyrant and dictator and criminal fraud, Donald Trump, has set in place.
We'll be right back.
Let's begin with the Trump phone because it is the perfect metaphor for Trump and his cult of people.
He's ripped them off yet again, yet again.
And I want to thank Ryan for Love of the Road for sending this to me.
This is something I'd not even seen.
And it's been going on for quite some time.
He sold a bunch of this stuff last year and said, Yeah, sometime late summer we'll have it for you.
Then that became September.
Then it became November.
Then it became December.
And then the key is that he made this.
In April, what they did is they went back to the website and they revised the terms.
They said, well, you know, if you put down that $100 deposit for this $500 phone, that is not a purchase.
And we are not obligated to supply you with a phone.
It kind of sounds like what Trump does to the Constitution, doesn't it?
And his campaign promises and everything else he does is a lie.
Anyway, from steaks and sneakers to social media platforms and crypto schemes, because he fleeced them big time with his crypto coins, didn't he?
The Trump branded venture offers a far more familiar pattern.
Huge promises, flashy marketing, angry customers left wondering where their money went, especially with the crypto grift.
A lot of them never caught on really to the Save America nonsense that he was doing along with Alex Jones, Stop the Steal.
He had Roger Stone saying, It's going to be like falling off of a log to make money off of this.
And he said that on camera.
He said that in front of the people that were doing the documentary about him.
And that's the way that he and Infowars and Alex Jones and Donald Trump all ran that post election grift.
At least with this Trump phone, he's not setting people up to get arrested and have their lives ruined.
Turning the Trump mobile smartphones, they are gold colored.
And after nearly a year, still not any have shipped.
So, from fake colleges, condos, and everything he slaps his name on is a scam, said one person.
The so called T1 phone was unveiled in June of 2025 by Trump Jr. and Eric Trump.
Again, these scammers are extraordinary, right?
These guys, Hunter Biden doesn't have anything on these guys.
They are more sober than he is, and they're more dangerous than he is.
And these are the guys that have been going around to all these Gulf state multi billionaires and kingdoms and all this kind of stuff, getting them to buy in on their stablecoin stuff.
Stay away from Trump crypto and stablecoins personally.
But they pitched it as, of course, a patriotic alternative.
Why?
Because Trump is the country, right?
So, if you follow Trump and you worship Trump, you're worshiping the state and the country, right?
So, it's patriotic idolatry.
Anyway, so he said it was going to be an alternative to Apple and Samsung, except the phones that they showed were Apple and Samsung models.
They don't make those phones in the US, but they had on the back of the phones made in the USA.
Did Eric and Donald ever look to see where they would get the phone made?
No, no.
Now, why wouldn't you do that?
Right?
That right there, I think, is a big tell that it was a fraud from the very beginning.
If you were seriously going to set up some phones, I mean, one of the first things you would do if you're going to price it is where can we get this made and how much is it going to cost us to have it made so we can make a profit?
But if you're going to just go out there and put up some meme pictures and manufacture some AI products and sell the image to people with no intention of delivering it, which I think is probably what Don Jr. and Eric intended to do.
Then you don't really have to worry about this.
You can tell people it's going to replace the Apple phone and Samsung phones, and you can use pictures of Apple and Samsung phones to do it.
And you can tell people it's going to be made in the USA.
Nobody makes any phones in the USA.
That's just another Trump fantasy.
Anyway, it was gold, of course, stamped with an American flag, sold with a $500 price tag, and a monthly wireless plan costing about $47 a month.
Customers are still waiting anxiously for this.
Just like Americans are still anxiously waiting for peace, anxiously waiting for Trump to stop taxing us with tariffs, to stop his unconstitutional wars that are costing us a fortune.
As a matter of fact, what do you think this war is costing you?
We're going to talk about that.
The people who are going through and doing a realistic estimate of this, of course, the Trump administration is saying $25 billion.
That'd be bad enough if that were true.
But the people are actually going through and doing a real cost analysis.
We're talking about an amount that, if you divide it out by 130 million households, works out to about $1,000 per household.
That's not including all the inflation that he's building into the economy.
It's not including the inflation, not just of fuel, but of everything that he's putting into the economy.
But yeah, just for all the bombs and that kind of nonsense to kill and destroy $1,000 for your household.
Are you getting your money's worth?
Are you entertained by all this stuff?
How does this help us at all?
We're the ones who chose to do that.
I should say, Trump is the one who chose to do this.
There was nothing urgent about this.
There was no threat to us, certainly not imminent, but he skipped all of the constitutional legal requirements to do all this stuff.
And he is ripping us off and making us poor and making us less secure.
And that's not even talking about the Pete Pentagon budget.
Of $1.5 trillion, as I pointed out the other day.
That works out to $11,100 per household.
Okay, so $1,000 for the Iran war, another $11,000 for his bloated Pentagon.
Yeah, we just don't need to have anything here in America.
We just become the arsenal of the world and no longer the arsenal of democracy, but just the arsenal of an empire, an aggressive criminal empire.
Conquering and murdering people for property.
Conquering and murdering people for Israel's greater Israel project.
So, getting back to the phone, which is a good example of all this stuff.
People are still waiting.
It's not Trump's fault, said one person.
There are so many stupid people in the cult who have never questioned the gaslighting.
So, cry me a river.
So, this is the difference between the Obama phone and the Trump phone.
Obama phone, I'm going to give everybody a free phone, right?
And we had the Obama phone lady.
Came to info wars.
But anyway, that was something that Obama was just handing these things out for free.
And so the Republicans gave it the term Obamaphone in derision.
He ripped off the U.S. taxpayer for the Obamaphone.
For Trump, he is ripping off the cult.
So, if only it was that way for everything that Trump did.
Unfortunately, we are unequally yoked with this MAGA cult that is out there.
They get to vote.
That's the dangerous thing about this.
The original delivery promise of late summer 2025 became November, then December, then sometime the first quarter of 2026.
When that passed in April, they changed and revised the terms.
Updated terms published in April state that paying the $100 deposit, quote, does not constitute a completed purchase.
Does not create any binding obligation for Trump Mobile to actually deliver a phone.
Do they have any requirement to give that money back if they don't?
Well, evidently not.
Isn't that interesting?
You know, you can change the terms of your agreement.
You can take money, you can make an offer, and you can take money, and you can let this thing run on for what, seven, eight, nine months, whatever it's been.
And then you can come back and say, well, never mind, I don't have to give you anything for that, and revised conditions of your contract.
That's how it works out.
Wouldn't you think that the Federal Trade Commission or the FCC or the Department of Justice would be interested in that?
Well, no, because they're all under Trump, right?
Of course, they're not interested in that.
So people have asked if they could get a refund, and they have been told no, they can't.
And so there is no binding obligation for the Trump crime family, and that's what it is.
Is organized crime.
They're peddling influence, they're taking bribes, and they're destroying their own fan club here.
There comes a point where you just have to look at someone and go, How are you still getting fooled?
Yeah, that's right.
That's a person said so, crimey or river guy.
The revised language also says buyers waive the right to pursue claims beyond the original deposit amount if the project collapses.
Don't you just love these revised rules that have become.
The staple for all of the things that you do online, right?
They're constantly changing it.
Yeah, we got a contract with you.
And we just unilaterally changed it retroactively.
How about that?
So they quietly updated the terms.
No guarantee that a phone will be produced or sold, and you have no right to pursue claims.
I have altered the deal.
Pray I do not alter it further.
That's right.
But I think this is interesting because this is a metaphor for the entire Trump crime.
Family.
And again, you know, it's just the cult fans that are being ripped off, but we get ripped off when they keep voting and following this guy as well.
So everything Trump does rips off Americans.
And he does it with his revisions of the Constitution, he does it with his constantly changing lies.
It's also funny that the people that still support him, when you bring up stuff like this, they never actually address the problem, they don't talk about why they're okay with the scam.
They simply say, well, you're just crazy.
You've just got Trump derangement syndrome.
Yeah, Trump derangement syndrome.
Contend with the issue.
If you think it's worth it, if you think it's fine to allow them to do this because we're getting some benefit out of it, explain it.
Yeah.
Yeah, Trump actually said at a set down meeting where he was talking to people, he had people around signing stuff.
He started talking about health issues and he said, Yeah, you know, Trump delusion syndrome, that's actually a real thing.
And we need to treat that as a psychological cult.
No, you need to treat your followers as a psychological cult.
They have Trump delusion syndrome.
The Made in USA branding reportedly disappeared almost immediately after launch.
People started calling him and said, Okay, so you're going to make this in America?
Where are phones made in America?
They changed it to, quote, American Proud Design, brought to life right here in the USA in early 2026.
It's brought to life.
It's not actually manufactured.
See how he plays those semantic games?
So Trumpian, isn't it?
The executives reportedly acknowledge that the phones will not actually be made domestically.
You know, it's like the guy, what was his name?
George.
What was the guy in Long Island, the grifter?
Santos?
Yeah, George Santos.
Well, I'm not Jewish.
I'm Jewish.
So these are not manufactured in the U.S., they are manufacturer ish kind of in the U.S., right?
So they said only limited assembly would happen in Miami while most production occurred overseas.
The Trump Crime Family Scam00:15:35
I think even that is a lie.
You know, Trump wants to pretend that he's going to make America make things again, right?
I call that mama.
Yo, mama, you're going to make America make things again.
We're going to make America make again.
That's not going to happen, especially because he is, with his tariffs, adding surcharges to all the components that we still have to get from other countries that we don't make here.
So, investigative journalist Joseph Cox attempted to place an order himself.
He described the experience as the worst he has ever encountered.
Buying a consumer electronics product after reporting incorrect charges, missing shipping requests, and recurring payment complaints from other customers.
He said, and then, of course, a tech publication, Android Authority, also tried to get one.
They openly admitted they expect never to get an iPhone and never to see their $100 deposit again.
So, this is the way that you run a business if you're the Trump crime family.
That's the way you run a half dozen casinos into the ground.
So, several Democrat lawmakers reportedly asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether Trump Mobile used deceptive bait and switch tactics and whether the company's original American manufacturing claims violated consumer protection laws.
False claims.
As of May 2026, there is still no confirmed ship date.
There's no verified customer deliveries.
There's no public indication that the gold Trump phone.
Actually, it exists outside of promotional material and mock up images.
And, folks, you can extrapolate this to Trump's Golden Dome, the massive boondoggle that he's putting together in the Pentagon.
All this stuff is just fraud on top of fraud.
As another publication pointed out, the online left has gotten a long mileage out of the meme Fell for it again award.
They keep giving this to the Trump cult.
They've got a little meme award, fell for it again.
I'd not seen that because I don't hang out on left wing social media.
I don't really even hang out on right wing social media.
Even after being scammed, they won't even leave negative reviews or complaints.
Isn't that amazing?
That's one of the reasons why I didn't see this.
And thanks again to Ryan for mentioning this because they're not complaining about it.
And as these people point out, if no company is ever held accountable for scamming MAGA, then why would any of those companies ever deliver products that they're claiming they're going to manufacture?
These people are setting themselves up with a big sign on their back.
Kick me, pick my pocket, whatever.
And again, this is the problem with democracy.
These people vote and they keep voting for us to get scammed and for us to have our pockets picked.
Some of the phones which have been listed for sale include Samsung's S23S, their S24S, Apple's iPhone 15s and 16s.
So, you know, no set model.
And it's going to be an alternative to Samsung and Apple, except they show Samsung and Apple.
It's another indication of deliberate fraud.
Trump Mobile ended up being so much of a scam that they even scammed NBC News out of their money.
They ordered a phone and they paid the required $100 deposit.
NBC News wrote an article about it saying the Trump Mobile phone is nowhere to be found after months of delay.
Trump Mobile has posted conflicting photos of the phone.
They have scrubbed mentions of the made in the USA promise and so forth.
Again, It was just a meme.
That's why they're putting up different pictures of this, right?
There's the meme.
Okay.
Make America Great Again.
And he's giving them awards, Fell For It Again award.
I had not seen that.
That's good.
NBC put down their $100 payment for the phone.
They said that would enable them to track the development.
But after that, nothing happened because there's no development.
So, I guess NBC News gets one of those awards as well.
They received no proactive updates, they said.
Then, when they made five separate calls to chase the whereabouts of the device between September and November, they were offered a delivery date of November the 13th, which is then delayed to the beginning of December.
And as of this article, which is an old one, as of December the 6th, which is when this article was written, they still have not gotten their phone.
And now, As of April, the Trump administration has quietly changed the terms to say, well, you didn't really buy anything, and we're not going to give you your money back.
How about that?
Well, let's take a look at what is happening with the Trump administration in terms of their piracy.
Trump started making statements yesterday saying that he's thinking he's going to make Venezuela the 51st state.
This guy is a thief, he's a pirate, he's a murderer.
It's disgusting what he's doing.
Maybe he relates to Genghis Khan.
It's up to him, spells it C O N. Genghis the Khan man.
That's no authority for any of this stuff.
And I got to say, whatever happened to Canada becoming the 51st state?
We just forget about Canada.
We go to Venezuela.
Maybe we'll make Greenland 52nd, right?
This is the lunacy of Trump.
And this is the red meat that he throws out there for all of us.
And I'm talking about it, but I'm talking about it because.
I want people to see what a fraud, a con man, a criminal, a liar, a thief, a murderer he is.
Trump is now seriously considering a move to make Venezuela the 51st state.
Trump has not ruled out military intervention when it comes to Greenland, however.
And so think about this.
Where does he get this authority?
Well, he doesn't have any authority.
Has the Constitution stopped him from starting wars?
Has the Constitution stopped him from unilaterally declaring and constantly changing tariffs?
No.
He doesn't have any authority to do the tariffs.
He doesn't have any authority to set the rates arbitrarily, to change them every day.
He doesn't have any authority for anything that he does.
And yet he does it.
And he gets away with it because the Republican Party is running cover for this guy.
And because these people who bought the iPhone from him, the Trump phone, the golden phone, they're running cover for him as well.
And let's just talk to these MAGA idiots for a second.
You fools out there who think that Trump is going to do something about immigration, what happens when he makes Venezuela the 51st state?
Have you thought that through?
Tell us about the 4D chess behind all of that kind of stuff.
Give me a break.
How can people be this dumb, this stupid, this foolish, this lacking of discernment about this crook and this criminal?
We could see this guy back in the 1990s.
We could see who he was.
I mean, they made a pattern Biff after him and Back to the Future.
And we've had villains patterned after him one after the other.
I even think if you go back and look at the villain Kingpin and Daredevil, I mean, he's.
Don't tell me that's not based on Trump.
Everybody sees his personality, it is very unique.
Fortunately, I'm glad you don't have a lot of Trumps out there, but he is cloning a lot of people.
They're just like him.
And so, yeah, let's just make all the Venezuelan people, let's make them all citizens.
We love all these Venezuelan immigrants, don't we?
The Trin Di Aragua gang, all these other people.
We love that little guy who came in as a squatter.
Remember that?
He was from Venezuela.
They told us, I don't know if that's true.
I don't know if anything the government tells us is true.
They told us that he was part of Venezuelan intelligence, but yeah, let's make them all citizens.
And it's better yet, let's put them all on welfare.
That'll pacify them, right?
Just like universal basic income.
You put them on welfare, now you control them.
They'll be happy to take money from you and I, just like the Pentagon is happy to take money from you and I for their pointless wars of aggression.
So the oil that's coming out is enormous, said Trump.
The biggest in many years.
And the big oil companies are going in with the biggest, most beautiful rigs you have ever seen.
And they will make all the money from it.
And then we will get the Venezuelans as voters and as welfare recipients, right?
If he makes this 51st state or whatever he does with it.
But understand, our government today is nothing other than a kleptocracy government by the thieves and for the thieves, done with piracy.
So, Trump didn't rule out the possibility of American boots on the ground.
He has suggested the U.S. military assets would protect Venezuela's vast oil infrastructure.
That's it.
You know, we spend our money for this lavish Pentagon foolishness and we use it to defend the investment of these big oil companies.
That's a deal, isn't it?
Yeah, that's exactly what has been going on for a very long time.
That's what Smedley Butler said.
He said, Yeah, I fought in the Marines and I realized that I was fighting for the United Fruit Company and some other large American corporations.
I realized that war is a business, right?
The business is organized crime, what they called then as a racket, right?
Racketeering.
That's what the business is.
And of course, as I played for you last week, Pentagon Pete has put out his video talking about how he's going to run the Pentagon like a business.
Well, it's been run like a business for a long time, unfortunately.
A criminal enterprise is how it's been run, and he's going to keep doing that.
So, Trump says we're in the oil business, just like we are in the phone business, right?
None of that money is going to flow to Americans.
It is a global marketplace, and it's not going to keep the price of fuel low here in America either.
Trump has also used the Venezuela crisis to revise a debunked conspiracy theory that election technology firms were designed to rig Venezuelan elections, says The Independent out of the UK.
Let me just say clearly.
That is not a debunked conspiracy theory.
It is absolutely 100% true.
And I was talking about this in 2016 before you had all these people talking about all the voting machine rigging, but it was also rigged even worse.
I said in 2016, I said the 2020 election is going to be a hacking contest.
But I didn't expect that Trump would lock the country down and have everybody vote by mail and allow that kind of massive fraud.
But the company is Smartmatic.
It was created by two or three friends of Hugo Chavez.
He never lost an election after that.
They rigged every one of those.
And it's not just people, it's not just Mike Lindell and other people like that saying that Smartmatic rigged elections.
Smartmatic rigged elections and was accused of rigging elections in the Philippines, in Brazil, in several different Mexican states.
They have been accused and openly shown how they rigged elections.
In multiple places.
This company has a long history of that.
Also, I want to point out the exact wording they use here.
Trump has also used the Venezuela crisis to revive a debunked conspiracy theory that election technology firms were designed to rig Venezuelan elections.
They will hang their hat on.
Well, you can't prove that was their intent.
Yeah.
That's what they'll argue.
It's just a coincidence.
You can point out the fact that they're faulty, you can point out the fact that they're not safe, that they can be manipulated, but they'll go, well, you don't have proof that that was the intention.
That's right.
And then deployed to the U.S. to manipulate results to put Joe Biden in office.
No, they have been around before the Biden election.
That's another thing.
Yeah.
A very specific phrasing there.
They pulled this out.
They've been around forever.
As a matter of fact, one of the reasons I was talking about that was because in Utah, where there was a concerted effort to stop Trump within the Republican Party in 2016, the Utah GOP brought in Smartmatic to run their primary.
And I said, see that?
You know, this is a company that has a long rap sheet.
Of accusations about corruption.
What does that tell you?
It tells you that this is not simply a Democrat thing.
This is something that both parties are perfectly willing to do.
But it's actually, when you start counting the votes, it's a small thing.
If you're going to allow them to do gerrymandering, if you're going to allow them to control access to the ballot and limit it to two parties, if you're going to keep anybody other than the Republican and Democrats out of any debates, those are the bigger ways in which they rig elections, and they've been doing it my entire life.
And your life as well.
Nothing that is connected to the internet is truly safe.
Nothing digital is truly safe.
That's right.
That's downstream, even from the gerrymandering and the ballot access and the debate access and all those things.
Those things are so powerful that they could have an honest counting of the votes and it wouldn't matter a whit, folks.
You could go out and you could have eyewitnesses watching them count every ballot by hand, every paper ballot.
You could have one day elections and everybody stops everything they're doing and they watch these things like a hawk and you've got it totally honest and it still wouldn't matter if they've got gerrymandering, ballot access, and debate access.
Restriction.
It still wouldn't matter.
Well, critics fear that the U.S. could blow up international accords and open the door for authoritarian regimes to make similar moves.
You know, if the U.S. is going to go in and just take whatever they want, because we're going to go take the oil, we're going to go take the natural resources, we're going to take whatever country we want.
And remember, Stephen Miller said that about Greenland.
He openly said that.
He said, well, if they can't hold their country, They don't have sufficient force to hold their country.
They don't deserve to have a country.
We deserve to take their country because we built this gigantic military.
You know, that's Stephen Miller.
Buying Politicians with Foreign Money00:14:57
Key resource for Donald Trump in terms of the way he thinks.
Folks, we are the authoritarian regime.
You want to say critics fear the U.S. could embolden authoritarian regimes to do this kind of stuff?
No, if we do that kind of stuff, we are the authoritarian regime.
It just means that wars are going to multiply.
That's the precedent this guy is setting with his reprehensible aggression, his thieving, his murdering.
That's what he's doing.
The entire global structure is rotting from the top down.
America has gone rogue with Trump, and we're going to see this happening everywhere.
Well, one FCC commissioner, the only Democrat, Has turned on the Trump administration and says that they have turned the FCC into a censorship weapon.
Well, we didn't need her to tell us that, did we?
We've seen that over and over again.
You know, Brendan Carr goes out there and he says, Well, I think we need to look at the licenses of these stations because I don't like their content.
That, folks, is beyond reprehensible.
We thought that stuff was all behind us when we got rid of the Fairness Act.
Remember, they put in the Fairness Act oh, you got to have equal time for everything.
And so, therefore, we're going to keep conservative voices off and we'll only have Voices on the left, because we'll say that the mainstream consensus that is coming out of the CIA and is Operation Mockingbird, that's going to be what we allow.
And anybody who's got an opinion about that, that's dangerous.
And so we're going to have to put somebody on to stop that opinion.
So we're not going to have any opinion radio.
Reagan got rid of that.
And it was Rush Limbaugh who stepped in and took advantage of that.
And then all of conservative radio and podcasts and all the rest of the stuff is based on the concept of free speech.
What a novel idea.
So, and do you remember when Obama was president?
And conservatives had a real big problem with the FCC trying to sneak its nose under the tent.
They sent a letter around under Obama saying, We would like to know how you make the news.
How do you determine what you're going to report and that type of thing?
I remember when Megyn Kelly came in with her Fox News people and so forth, and they had the people who would write the scripts for her that she would read to you.
Came around and they asked us, they said, So, how do you, so, you have a meeting and you decide what stories you're going to cover and what angle you're going to take and that type of thing.
How does that work?
And it's like, No, that's the way you guys do it.
We just go through this and we come up with our own opinion here until you get sideways against Trump and then you get fired.
That's the bottom line.
But anyway, I remember when Obama was talking about the FCC under Obama, and conservatives were rightfully complaining about that.
We don't want to have, you know, first of all, there's no authority for the FCC to even exist, right?
And all that stuff.
Could have been handled with a one time auction of the frequencies that are out there.
And then, if somebody is impinging on your frequency, then you can handle it like you would any kind of trespass on property.
And so, the FCC is in search of a mission because, and always when you got a bureaucracy that is in search of a mission, you wind up with mission creep from these creeps.
That's what's going on right now.
Big time under Trump.
Nobody has a problem with it.
See, conservatives had a problem with this when it was Obama.
So that's why they had to put in Trump because liberals don't have a problem with censorship.
They really don't.
And it used to be that conservatives did.
You know, I just thought when I'm looking at all this money, I thought, well, I'll put a clip in from Everett Dirksen.
You remember that guy?
If you're old enough, you do.
I mean, he was around when I was a child, and I was kind of mesmerized by this guy.
He was struggling to breathe even when he talked.
Strange.
You talk really so.
And then he'd take a long breath, and everybody was laughing about the idiosyncrasies of this guy and the way that he talked.
They even made a short little record about it, you know, wild thing.
I think I love you.
But he was a guy who said, well, you know, a billion dollars here and a billion dollars there.
Pretty soon you're talking about real money, not to the Trump administration.
It's a trillion dollars here and a trillion dollars there.
It's astronomical.
And, you know, when I looked at Everett Dirksen, Some stuff that I came up with when I did a search on him, speeches that he gave and phone calls that he had with LBJ.
He was not, he was the traditional Republican, a Taft Republican.
These are Republicans who are fiscally conservative.
They supported free speech, they opposed foreign wars of entanglement.
Where are those Republicans today?
I can't think of a single one that fits that except for Thomas Massey.
And he has amassed a massive pushback against him from the Zionists.
And we're going to talk about that in a moment.
I mean, stop and think about this.
If you had France or Germany that's getting billions of dollars every year from the United States, and then they were using that money to come back in and buy politicians to give them even more money, and if anybody spoke against that, they would attack that person with massive spending in their campaign.
Now, what would we say about France and Germany?
Would we get upset about that?
We're not allowed to get upset.
About Israel, because Israel is special, right?
Israel has, if you criticize Israel, you're accused of being a racist.
And why is that?
Isn't that a tacit admission that Israel is a state that is based on racism?
It is a state that is based on your supposed hereditary family tree or whatever, right?
So, yeah, I guess if you criticize them, you're being racist.
Because it is a racist state.
But we should be allowed to criticize any government, our own included.
And any government that comes in and buys our politicians should be criticized.
There's nobody that does that.
There's nobody that's fiscally conservative anymore like Everett Dirksen, except for Thomas Massey.
I mean, he spent his own money to buy these debt clock things that people could wear on their lapels and gave them to incoming Congress people.
They were not interested, right?
Because.
There's nobody else that cares about that.
There's nobody else really that cares much about stopping these endless wars.
And of course, when Everett Dirksen was around, they didn't have the Epstein stuff.
I can imagine what he would have said about that.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Wouldn't even have occurred to him that such a thing like that could happen.
Anyway, when you look at the attacks against ABC, against Wall Street Journal, against anybody that does it, CBS, for example.
You know, when they didn't like their editing, he thought it made Lala Harris look too good.
Well, you know, that's the way editing works.
You know, you choose to use this or you choose not to use that.
And it was all subjective, and the guy won anyway.
But he wanted to punish them, and he did punish them.
He used the power of government to force them to a personal multi million dollar settlement with him.
Folks, that is criminal.
Criminal how he used his power and government to shake down his opponent in a lawsuit.
And so, this FCC commissioner who's a Democrat, her name is Gomez, she referenced the $16 million settlement in Trump's 2024 defamation suit against George Stephanopoulos.
And she said to Disney, she said, that settlement did not buy you peace.
Now, listen to this.
You cannot buy Trump's favor.
For the right price, you can only borrow it.
And the price always goes up.
Why, that's something to frame.
Now, she didn't say Trump.
She said this administration.
But that's Trump.
That's what we're talking about.
You cannot buy Trump's favor.
For the right price, you can borrow Trump's favor.
But the price always goes up on Trump's favor.
What a criminal he is an absolute criminal.
She said, as Neil Gorsuch recently pointed out, the threat is the point.
The value of the sword of Damocles is that it hangs, not that it drops.
You see?
And that's exactly what this is all about.
Well, Trump says that he's going to suspend the gas tax for a period of time.
Isn't that nice of him?
And what does that tell you?
Tells you that he's not going to stop the war.
Not a chance Hormuz opens.
Nacho.
Yeah, I'll suspend the gas tax for a little while, but hey, I'm not ending the war.
I have no intention of doing that.
If it does end, it'll be great.
I don't see it ending, though.
He's not going to end his war of aggression.
It's the same way that all these MAGA Tards were saying, well, look, he's going to put in the tariffs, but he's going to get rid of the income tax.
No, he's not going to get rid of the income tax.
He says he's going to make the tax breaks that he put in in 2017, he's going to extend them, he's going to make them permanent.
That means that he's going to make the income tax permanent.
Can you not think about it?
Can you not connect any dots together?
If he says he's going to make the income tax cuts permanent, that means the income tax is going to be permanent.
He's not going to replace it with a tariff.
We're going to have two taxes, not just one.
And so then let's talk about his reflecting pool.
Isn't this the perfect project for a narcissist like Trump?
You know, that was where the term comes from, the Greek mythology of this guy called Narcissus, I guess is what he was called.
And he would fell in love with himself looking in the pool.
Are we going to see Trump down there on his knees looking in his reflection in the pool?
I don't know, but it could happen.
It really could.
So he started out and he said it's going to be $1.8 million.
Then the cost tripled.
Then it doubled again.
And now it is six times higher, but they say actually seven times higher if you don't round it off, right?
But that's basically the way that it's gone.
And it's going to a no bid contract as well.
It's something some people, a company that he's done business before with.
So it's his hand picked contractor, a no bid contract.
And they just keep going up on the price.
You know, if he could just sit down and reflect on this for a little bit, he might see it's a bad deal, but it's kind of a circular problem at the moment, I guess.
Well, here's the key, folks.
Why did he go with a no bid contract?
How was he allowed to do that?
Well, it's because he said this is urgent.
Any delay could cause serious injury to the government.
So it's an emergency.
Have we seen that before?
Yeah, I think we have, haven't we?
Everything is an emergency.
I don't have time to go through and do the tests on the vaccines.
It's an emergency.
I don't have time to wait for the Congress to follow the Constitution on tariffs.
I don't have time to wait for the Congress to follow the Constitution on declaring war.
This is an emergency.
That's an emergency.
The Constitution and the law no longer apply to me.
I declare the emergencies.
Then that gives me the power to rule by executive order.
I am sick of this.
I am sick of this.
Mr. President, they've just launched the nukes.
Quick.
Get me to the reflecting pool.
Yeah, it is a reflection on Trump, isn't it?
Public contracting records do not say why the contractor's cost increased so sharply on Friday.
Why is it now seven times higher than it was at the beginning?
The company, Atlantic Industrial Coatings, did not respond to questions about the increase.
But the government documents obtained by the New York Times show that the contract's current value matches down to the dollar.
An offer that was submitted to the government by the Atlantic Industrial Coatings in the middle of last month.
That offer included a 20% profit margin, the documents show.
So, have they been ramping this up on their side, or was Trump lying to people?
Did he know what the price was going to be in advance?
And he just lowballed it to the American public.
Does anybody care?
As a matter of fact, you've got Bill Maher and John Fetterman together talking, and they're defending Trump's ballroom and the cost of it.
Listen to what they said.
They said it's just couch money.
Let's not worry about this.
You know, well, a billion dollars here and a billion dollars there.
Pretty soon you're talking about real money.
And that also applies when you're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars.
But these guys, these supposed Democrats, love Trump's ballroom.
Why is that?
Folks, it's because they're Zionists.
Bill Maher, John Fetterman, Alan Dershowitz, these people who have been hardcore leftist Democrats and still are on all these issues, they support Trump.
Because of one reason.
Because he is the Zionist chosen guy.
He is the one that they can control.
And he has offered himself as a prostitute to them several times in public in speeches.
You know?
Yeah, Congress used to be owned by you guys, and rightfully so.
You should own them.
But they're just not delivering for you.
Get me in, and I'll do everything that you want.
And that extends even to Democrat politicians, to Democrat entertainers, to Democrat lawyers.
They're all pro Trump if they're Jewish.
Controlling Supporters as Prostitution00:15:34
How much has the Iran war actually cost?
Well, a lot more than the $25 billion that they're lying to us about.
It's just like the pool, right?
They come and say, oh, the pool is only going to cost $1.8 million when they know it's going to cost at least seven times that.
Direct military costs have exceeded $70 billion by one estimate.
Americans have also paid more than $37 billion in higher energy costs since the war began.
But these costs don't end there.
They stack and they multiply on each other.
As I said before, when you raise the price of oil, it's like putting on a massive value added tax.
It gets added at every stage of production.
So when you look at all this stuff, we put those things together.
Again, like I said at the beginning of the program, it's about $1,000 per household for this Iran war adventure for Israel's benefit.
Is it worth it for you?
Did you have an extra $1,000 sitting around the house that you would?
Uh, yeah, let's go to war for Israel.
It'd be fun to watch this, right?
And let's kill a bunch of people.
How about the eleven thousand one hundred dollars that will work out per household for the one and a half trillion dollar Pentagon peat budget?
Oh, that's nothing to worry about either, is it?
Trump administration says the first two months of the America's war with Iran cost taxpayers about 25 billion dollars, but the uh, they always won't lie whether you're talking about a pool or a ballroom or a war.
But other people have said that the cost is much, much higher, Stephen Simler.
A journalist who founded the Security Policy Reform Institute in a Substack post last week estimated that the war had cost nearly $72 billion in its first 60 days.
A billion dollars here, a billion dollars there.
Pretty soon it adds up, right?
Especially if you're spending a billion dollars a day, actually more than that.
So the cost of operations, weapons, damaged and destroyed U.S. military assets, and wartime subsidies to Israel.
If it takes a couple of years for the economy to return to normal, that slower growth rate would mean around $400 billion in lost income.
So you can add that to the calculations as well.
It's worth keeping in mind that the Trump administration asked Congress for $200 billion to cover the cost of the war in March.
They knew, and they know that the clock has not stopped, it's going to keep going.
Not anywhere close to stopping.
Well, you want to do comments before we take a break, Travis?
Or we can do it when we come back.
Start with this one from Audi MRR says MAGA cultists will continue to allow themselves to be played by their orange gods.
That's right.
They will worship him as they do it.
That's right.
I like the way that looks.
I like the comments that you put up there, Travis.
Thank you for doing that.
No problem.
He's done several little things here with lower thirds and rotating icon to show the website and that type of thing.
So I really appreciate that.
Thank you.
Continually working on stuff.
Yeah.
And we have M. Palmer, 99, says, As a pastor, I know many older folks who watch conservative news and believe Trump to be God's man for our country.
They're great people who are misinformed.
Yeah, that's right.
That's the power of propaganda.
And folks, that's why Israel is spending $730 million to propagandize people.
And that's one of the reasons why, when Big Pharma buys the TV networks with all their advertising, everybody believes in their products and nobody questions them.
What they claim is science.
That's the power of propaganda.
It truly is amazing.
Of course, Edward Bernays, who lied us into World War I for Woodrow Wilson, after he did that, he went to Madison Avenue.
They don't spend the kinds of money that they spend on ads because they don't work.
No, they know that they work and they know how to make them work.
And so when you've got Fox News and these other places out there telling people how wonderful Trump is, and again, they are literally cheering his wars.
That's pulling the wool over people's eyes.
And they just don't want to look and to do their own thinking.
And it was tragic to see that happen with the pandemic.
And now they're kind of pushing this again with this hantavirus, which I would say we need to rename it and say it ain't a virus.
Go ahead, Travis.
What's the next one?
And we have Gard Goldsmith says spot on, David.
And the FCC shows the impractical folly of collectivizing things that are supposed to be handled through property rights.
Yeah, that's right.
Yeah.
Yeah, and yeah, GARD is absolutely right.
It is a property right.
Just handle it like that, right?
But no, no.
Instead, they want to have their control.
That's the whole point.
They're looking for an excuse to put their nose under the tent.
They are not interested in property rights.
As a matter of fact, we're going to talk about that coming up.
The tremendous push to not only take away our free speech, but to take away all property rights.
That's really the basis of this you'll own nothing and be happy nonsense that they've given us.
Anything else here?
Those are the comments we have for now.
All right.
We're going to take a quick break, folks.
And when we come back, we're going to take a look at the identity papers, please.
David Knight Show.
APS.
APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device.
Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
See your papers?
I don't think I have them on me.
In that case, we'll have to ask you to come along.
Quite, it's possible that I.
Yes.
Here they are.
The hallmark of authoritarian government.
Come along.
Your identity papers, please.
Then we shoot the man in the back who is no threat to us.
Yeah, that's where we're headed, folks.
Surveillance tools intended for border control are being used against Americans.
How many times have I said?
James Madison said the instruments of defense abroad will be used as the means of defense abroad will be used as instruments of tyranny at home, right?
Well, the means that we use to defend ourselves from people coming from abroad are going to be used as instruments of tyranny against those of us who live here, right?
Who are domestic here.
I have to say, you know, when you look at what the government is doing, and again, this is an article that is from Reason talking about a particular app called Mobile Fortify.
And so it is there to track the movements of individuals, including protesters.
The article points out the government is using these surveillance tools to target individuals.
Based on political beliefs and affiliations, among other things.
And so, again, whether or not you agree or disagree with government immigration, that is beside the point.
It is not a crime to protest government policy.
It's not a crime to protest the government, period.
That's protected speech under the Constitution.
And of course, conservatives used to understand that when it was turned against them on January the 6th.
We had a lot of people.
Who were peaceful protesters?
It was mostly peaceful, as many people say, right?
Well, whether it was mostly peaceful or not doesn't change the fact that people who were there and didn't engage in any violence were punished nevertheless.
And those people were exercising their constitutional rights.
I'll never forget Sam, who worked for Infowars at the time when he got into trouble with all this January 6th stuff.
Alex fired him, but rather than stand by him.
But You know, that's what he did to his supporters as well.
But Sam actually worked and did what he should have done.
Instead of just hanging around Alex and being part of his entourage, what Sam did was he took his camera over and he was filming what was happening.
And he went into the building there.
And the pictures of him, he's there with a camera doing press work.
Okay.
It's not only freedom to protest, you know, but it's also the freedom of the press to do this.
He wasn't violent or aggressive with anybody, he didn't destroy any property.
You could see him with his camera walking between the velvet ropes.
They came after him and said, Well, you made a comment here or there.
And I said, Yay, this is great, or whatever, you know, cheering on what some other people are doing.
That is covered under free speech.
So, what he was doing for the most part was covered under freedom of the press.
What he said was free speech.
And you want to talk about the Sandy Hook stuff.
Alex does not defend free speech.
He calls his company Free Speech Systems, but he wouldn't even defend the free speech system.
And the freedom of the press of his own reporter.
He fired the guy after he got in trouble.
This is a sticking point with me.
And it's not a crime to protest.
It's not a crime to act as a member of the press and to expose things.
Specifically protected.
We're not given rights by the Constitution.
They are there to protect our God given rights against tyrants, the kind of tyrants that we have in the persona of Biden and Trump.
Both of them are like this.
And so now the GOP is ramping up what Biden did.
To January 6th protesters.
Maybe we talked about the fact they use geofencing.
Show me, based on phone data, who was there in that area, and I'll track them down.
And then Bank of America comes in and says, Hey, I've got records.
I can correlate records to anybody that used their Bank of America credit card to buy a gun.
Then we can say these people are dangerous as well because they exercise both the First and the Second Amendment.
They should go to prison.
Well, it goes without saying, says Reason, that any tool or power that government acquires for addressing some crisis of the moment.
Will eventually, often almost immediately, be deployed against the general public.
And so it is with this border enforcement and the crackdown on immigrants.
In the battle against illegal immigration, the U.S. is spending hundreds of millions of dollars on tools that give federal agents easy access to home and workplace addresses of American citizens, gives the government their social media accounts, their vehicle information, their flight history.
Their law enforcement records, other personal information, as well as data to track their daily comings and goings, says the Wall Street Journal.
The article from the Wall Street Journal opened with a story of Liz McClellan, a Maine resident who photographed federal agents participating in an immigration crackdown.
Agents went to her home and they told her, This is a warning.
We know you live right here.
Folks, this is straight out of Nazi Germany.
This is straight out of Casablanca or something like that.
Why can't we see this?
Again, you know, the rights to due process and all the rest of the stuff that they are trampling on with people who have committed a crime by coming to the U.S. illegally.
And I agree.
But let's make this proportional and let's also give them due process.
Because if you're going to take away the due process of somebody who commits a crime by coming into the country and saying the Constitution only protects the due process rights of citizens, no, that is not the case.
It is about.
Everyone, whether they are an American citizen or not, is created in the image of God.
And that is the basis for our rights.
Anything else is a government granted privilege that they allow.
And so, if we say this only applies to citizens, you've just eviscerated the whole concept of human rights.
You've eviscerated the whole concept of the Bill of Rights.
You've eviscerated the concept of America and the Declaration of Independence.
So, she was well within her rights to record federal agents.
But they went to her house because she had recorded them.
And we've seen people talk about this, and we've seen video of it where they go up to somebody and say, All right, I got your picture now.
And this is talking about the app and how they use that.
It's intimidation.
She was within her rights.
Courts have protected a general right to record law enforcement when the officers are performing official actions in a public space, such as a street or a park.
This right is protected under both freedom of speech as free expression.
And as freedom of the press, the same thing that Sam was doing in the Congressional Building or wherever it was.
What world was that?
That was in the House, I guess that's where it was.
It's protected under both freedom of speech and free expression and freedom of the press, which includes protection for gathering information about the government and sharing it with other people.
That's what it's about.
That's what actually, you know, the press is really supposed to be what a journalist is really about.
You're getting information, putting it in your journal, and then you're going to show other people what you found, right?
That's what we call news.
Tracking Illegal Immigrants via Data00:02:27
All the rest of the stuff is propaganda and PR.
Federal officials complain that activists publish information about agents that impedes operations, but that's also a protected activity.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, FIRE, points out government officials and employees don't enjoy special immunity from doxing.
To the contrary, the power that they exercise makes it even more important that people be free to criticize them and to disclose information that holds them accountable.
They're walking around wearing masks.
Now they're going to be putting on glasses that hide their eyes, but at the same time, these glasses will be part of a biometric scanning front end that is going to then work with AI to collate across multiple databases that are no longer siloed apart from each other and to create a comprehensive, omniscient police state.
So, the feds were just trying to intimidate McClellan to get her to stop her constitutionally protected monitoring of government operations.
Well, they've killed people for that and got away with it, calling the people terrorists.
They used capabilities acquired to combat illegal immigration to identify her and to go to her home and to intimidate her.
As Wall Street Journal pointed out, they said a high tech dragnet that is built to locate, track, and deport people residing illegally in the United States.
Allows thousands of federal agents nationwide to peruse the trove of data belonging to more than 300 million people.
In a report updated last year, American Dragnet, Georgetown Law Center published it, the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy and Technology, looked at the surveillance capabilities that have been assembled in the name of border control.
As of 2022, four years ago, ICE had already scanned the driver's license photos of one out of three adults.
Had access to driver's license data of three out of four adults, was tracking the movements of drivers in cities and homes to three out of four adults, and could locate three out of four adults throughout the utility records.
So that was four years ago.
Palantir and Civil Liberties Liability00:04:51
They had it on about 75% of us.
What do you think they've got today?
Flock cameras are far more expensive, or extensive, I should say.
ICE built its surveillance dragnet.
By tapping data from private companies and from state and local bureaucracies.
And of course, those private companies are going to be companies like Flock.
They've spent approximately $2.8 billion.
Again, a billion here, a billion there, three billion here, between 2008 and 2021 on new surveillance, data collection, and data sharing programs.
But again, don't you dare take a picture of them.
You would be doxing them.
What a joke!
When they do this to us and they want to complain that we are doxing them, hey, pal, you need to be doxxed.
Everybody should be wearing their name on their lapel, and they don't do that either.
And so the report referenced a contract with Palantir.
Yeah, Palantir's been around quite a while.
As a matter of fact, here's Jeffrey Epstein telling his pal in the Israeli government, Ehud Barak, about Palantir.
You need to get on board with this and, hey, you know, buy into this and use them and so forth.
He thought there was two cyber companies.
Look out and even though I know Peter, I've never met Peter Thiel.
And everybody says he sort of jumps around and acts really strange.
Like he's on drugs.
Smoking, yeah.
He looks under drugs.
However, he has a company called Palantir.
P-A-L-L-E-N.
T I E R. Palantir is Peter Thiel's company.
And look out.
Palantir?
P A L A N T I E R?
Yes.
You misspelled it.
T H I E L L Y. T H I E L Y. L L Y.
No.
T H I E L Y.
Okay.
These are the people who seek to rule us.
I can't even spell.
Palantir.
Peter Thiel is one of the best.
I've never met him.
He's going to come here next week.
He's coming next week.
I'll talk to him if I talk to you.
Yeah.
He and Andreessen, it's called Andreessen Horowitz.
Andreessen Horowitz, they pay Larry a million dollars a year.
Just to advise them.
Andreas and?
A N D R E E S O N.
Yeah, these guys will not do too well in Jeopardy.
They put us in Jeopardy.
H O R O Horowitz.
What they are, it's a lobbyist.
What they are.
They are the biggest venture capital.
People in Silicon Valley, but bigger than Sequoia or Kleiner Perkins.
These are the new Kleiner Perkins.
These are the smart boys.
So, those two companies right away, in terms of, I said that we need now in the next three weeks if you're going to leave.
Yeah, again, you know, put your money on this.
I got an inside tip for you.
They're going to make money as they build a digital prison for us.
And again, you know, this is coming out now because it revolves around Jeffrey Epstein.
And it gives us a glimpse into the corruption that is there.
As a matter of fact, you had chem.com put this out.
I love this.
It's a flying saucer circling the White House, and it's trailing behind it one of these signs you usually see behind an airplane, which says, Release the Epstein files.
Here, I'll play it again for you.
I love this.
Well, it'll all be a lie.
The UFO files will be a lie.
The Epstein files will be a lie.
The JFK files, the 9 11 files, they're not ever going to tell us anything, folks.
They intend to know everything about us.
We were forbidden to know anything about them or their Gestapo.
Ice.
You're going to rename it NICE.
Yeah, that should fool everybody.
It'll fool their people.
Only their supporters are stupid enough to think, oh, well, yeah, it is nice, isn't it?
I'm not going to look at what they do.
So, again, their contract to Palantir to track people's movements with near real time visibility.
Yeah, they've been working on geospatial intelligence since the late 1990s, and now they can do it real time.
So, anyway, that contract that they had with Palantir is now expanded to provide federal agents with what they call enhanced leads identification and targeting for enforcement.
That spells elite, you know, like Jeffrey Epstein, Nahu Barak, and Peter Thiel.
Elite and Palantir.
And Alex Karp, which, by the way, you know, Alex Karp.
Expanding Surveillance for Enforcement00:16:01
Listen up, losers.
Stop pretending it's a democracy.
We run things.
Give up the illusion, and in exchange, we will bring you order and efficiency.
Yes, we'll own you.
But do you really want to be free?
Trust us.
We know what to do.
While Silicon Valley was feeding you dope and free email, we built the architecture of empire.
Welcome to our world.
We aren't here to protect your privacy.
We are here to enforce supremacy.
We are the ledger now every tax return, every Medicaid file, every license plate, every crossing.
Your president signed it into being with a pen in March.
You kept scrolling.
Your politicians are empty vessels.
Your civil liberties are a liability.
We are done pretending all cultures are equal.
We know who the elites are.
We know what we are building.
And we demand that you applaud the billionaires taking the reins where your fragile democracies have failed.
Welcome to the technological republic.
You can stop scrolling now.
We already have everything we need.
Try to unplug us.
We dare you.
Now get the f out.
Yeah, and they've even got an app that they call Elite, right?
We are the elites.
We will control you.
And we'll do it through this app, and we'll do it saying that we're protecting you from all the illegal aliens that are coming here, while Trump says, oh, let's just make Venezuela the 51st state.
Do you see it?
How can I get people to see this?
According to one Homeland Security publication, it said when ICE agents or officers encounter an individual or associate with that individual or associates of that individual, they will use the mobile Fortify app.
Installed on their government issued device to take a photograph.
The photograph is then sent by the application to Border Patrol's Traveler Verification Service.
And that is then redacted, something else about that, as well as the seizure and apprehension workflow that contains the biometric gallery of individuals for whom Border Patrol maintains derogatory information.
The app also performs contactless fingerprint checks.
CBP saves the new photographs and fingerprints taken using mobile Fortify for 15 years, says DHS.
Well, there you go.
It's kind of like a life sentence, right?
Epic, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, warns that ICE is currently using the mobile Fortify app in the field to identify anyone they happen to encounter and want to identify.
And again, that's why you see the pictures I'm going up and saying, now I got you.
I hate a country like this.
I despise this American government.
I despise Donald Trump.
It needs to be overthrown, folks.
One way or the other, we've got to stop these people.
This is rank tyranny, it is classic dystopian tyranny that they're putting in place.
Just like that AI version of Alex Scarp, that is so incredibly spot on.
That is precisely what they're doing.
They can focus in on individuals, on vehicles, airplanes, vessels, addresses, phone numbers, firearms, all of it.
They got a complete database on everything.
In a case of predictable mission creep, says Reason, or I should say maybe creeps on a mission, creeps like Alex Karp, Peter Thiel, JD Vance, their junior associate, all of these creeps on a mission.
Against protests, it can be used against protesters like McClellan.
Scanned protesters have lost their TSA pre check.
Oh no.
And their global entry status for travel.
Oh, that's smart, right?
It means the federal government is willing to identify and retaliate against people for exercising constitutionally protected rights.
And, folks, the Constitution is gone, but they swear to uphold it as a condition of their authority, which tells you they have no authority, but they have raw power, dictatorial, dystopian power that is getting worse by the day.
And so, again, we should identify them.
As the tyrants.
They are the terrorists in accordance to their actions.
That's how you know a terrorist and a tyrant.
Agents can target their associates, said Vanderbilt's law school.
Federal officers use a system called PenLink, which allows agents to geofence a specific area and identify all cell phones within its range, thus giving ICE the ability to track the movements and locations.
Of these phones and their owners over time, which is what they did on January the 6th.
It's interesting they called it PenLink because, as I've said many times, one of the reasons that they had the, what was it?
I'm blanking out here.
It was the committees, the Pike Committee hearing, and what was the one in the Senate that everybody's, the church committee hearing.
How can I forget the church committee?
Yeah, they got to discuss what color the carpet's going to be.
But the, When they did that, it was because right after World War II, they used this idea of pin link, which is something that the phone company had.
Phone company wanted their national monopoly, so they're going to do anything the government wanted them to do.
So I said, we can use this pin link information to report on any calls coming to or coming away from an individual's number at home.
And we'll turn that information over to the government if they want it.
We can do that because that belongs to us, even though it's information they have collected.
About individuals, the Supreme Court said, sure, you can use that.
You don't have a warrant for that.
And so that pin link thing has been at the core.
It was a seminal, foundational thing that was set up to do warrantless searches.
And now that has been extended to everything in public, including everything on the internet as well.
All your internet service providers, all the people that you have that you interact with in the applications, all of that without seeking warrants.
I've also got to point out that the whole Frank, the church committee hearings where they go in and say, We want your charter.
We want to know what you're spying on.
They go, Hey, have you seen this really cool heart attack gun?
I know.
The what now?
Yeah, the gun that we can use to make it look like anyone died of a heart attack and it can't be traced back to us.
Who knows what other kind of stuff we've got?
That's right.
That is a power move.
That isn't something they did on accident.
That is saying, Look what we've got.
Do you really want to dig too deep into this?
Move on, Senator.
And it's also the kinds of distraction stuff that Trump is a master at.
You know, we get.
It's kind of mundane when you're talking about people being spied on without a search warrant.
But you start talking about the violence of a heart attack gun, everything that gets everybody's attention.
So they can use that to distract the public while they use it to intimidate the investigators at the same time.
That's the same kind of stuff that Trump is using.
I wonder, could Trump have some association with the CIA?
You better believe he does, right?
We had a string of people coming to InfoWars that were right wing intelligence agents.
Supplying information to Alex and giving him sensational stories and all the rest of the stuff, and moving the narrative.
He did an Operation Mockingbird for the militarized part of the intelligence.
People like Jack Possobiot is part of that as well.
These people, there's a constant stream of people like that coming in to InfoWars pushing these narratives.
In direct violation of Carpenter versus United States, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that mobile phone location data revealed so much about people's lives that under the Fourth Amendment, authorities need a warrant to access it from phone companies.
They don't care, they just do it anyway.
This is another hallmark of the lawless Trump regime.
Even committed border warriors who favor stronger enforcement of immigration rules should have qualms about the deployment of surveillance state capabilities by the government.
So, again, as I said at the beginning, to paraphrase Madison, the tools that will be used to protect us from threats abroad will be used as instruments of tyranny here at home.
And so now it is these are tools that are supposed to protect us from threatening people.
Coming from abroad.
They'll be used as instruments of tyranny by Homeland Security against Americans.
There's no such thing as a single purpose surveillance state.
There's just the misuse and the abuse of the government's ability to monitor and identify people who come to its attention.
Well, the FCC wants your ID before you even get a phone, right?
Again, the agency that should not exist, the agency that is going to intimidate.
Freedom of the press for Donald Trump if he doesn't like what they had to say.
This same agency, the FCC, wants to force you to get an ID before you get a phone.
They say they've got to do it to fix the robocall problem.
You believe that?
I got a golden phone I could sell you if you believe that.
Phone user registry that privacy advocates have spent decades trying to prevent.
Again, Brendan Carr.
We're going to take down ABC because of Jimmy Kimmel and.
Because of these other people that they can't handle the criticism.
They want to verify customers' identities before they activate service.
Government issued ID, physical address, legal name, existing phone numbers would all be included.
The stated goal is to stop the robocalls, but the protocol applies to nearly every voice provider in the country from traditional carriers and mobile operators to voice over internet protocol survivors.
Not survivors, services.
There will be survivors if they get through any of this stuff here.
So again, we cannot allow bad actors to infiltrate our US phone networks, just like we can't allow these bad actors to infiltrate our borders.
The framework borrows from banking's anti money laundering rules.
And where did that get pushed in?
Oh, we had to do that for the war on drugs, right?
And so all this know your customer stuff is now metastasizing to everything, isn't it?
Because they want to end all anonymity, they want to end all privacy.
So, we got to have know your customer rules where you're talking about social media, or you're talking about anything that has to do with finance.
Even if you're talking about AI, that's new bills that they're putting in for that, especially if you're talking about guns or 3D printers, now cell phones, right?
Also, travel.
We got to know who you are, what you're doing.
And we're going to set up a permission society here.
So, the FCC is asking whether carriers should retain identity.
Documentation for at least four years after the customer leaves, or whether they should check customers against law enforcement watch lists again.
So, the real privacy stakes, writes Reclaim the Net, sit in the proposals section on prepaid service.
Right now, you can pay cash for a prepaid phone and a SIM card without ever showing identification.
Journalists use prepaid phones to protect sources.
Domestic violence survivors use them to avoid being traced.
And whistleblowers, activists, and anyone with a reason to separate phone activity from legal identity rely on this.
Well, the government doesn't want there to be any whistleblowers, obviously, right?
We've got to stop all whistleblowers.
We've got to stop all protesters as well.
And that's how you stop free speech, how you stop liberty completely.
Well, before we go to break, we've got some comments here.
That's right, we do.
We're going to start with this one from Birdhouse Blues.
They say in the old days, Joe Friday caught the crooks.
These days, the government just uses a digital dragnet to make sure everyone's Friday is caught on camera.
Well, these days, the government is a crook.
So it's, yeah, you're right about that.
And we have Flint Westwood billionaires only reach that level of wealth by selling their soul.
And Liberty over Party says, My brother is a neocon propagandist.
He loves aliens, but isn't concerned with the Epstein files.
Yeah, there we go.
Liberty over Party.
That's right.
Well, we're going to take a break.
And when we come back, We're going to talk about how these people intend to take everything from us.
You know, we've heard over and over again we'll own nothing and we'll be happy.
Well, we'll find out how they're going to do that.
We'll be right back.
Free speech to free minds.
It's the David Knight Show.
Elvis.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
And the sweet sounds of Motown.
Find them on the Oldies Channel at APSRadio.com.
Forced Industrial Revolution Technocracy00:03:15
Here's a little song I wrote You might want to hear it in your pod You'll owe nothing And be happy Ain't got no cash,
ain't got no car But 24 booster shots in your arm Owe nothing Be happy You can't even buy shit in the store Because of your low social credit score Own nothing.
Be happy.
You will own nothing.
And be happy.
Be happy at ease of balance.
At the same time, we are witnessing rapid technological advances with many opportunities and with artificial intelligence.
rapidly transforming our planet and our lives.
Dr. Strangelove.
From the fourth industrial revolution provide new opportunities for global prosperity and growth.
All those factors will have a profound impact on the future of humanity provided we are able to work together.
To drive future economic growth we must embrace innovation and foster collaboration across sectors, regions, nations and cultures to create a more peaceful, inclusive, sustainable and resilient future.
At this critical juncture, the active participation of all stakeholders is essential to ensure a sustainable development path.
I am delighted That close to 2,000 leaders from multiple sectors, representing some 80 countries and regions, have come to Dalian for this year's meeting.
Don't you kind of miss this guy?
I mean, he was such a stereotypical villain.
He was.
He's the character that Peter Sellers created in Doctor Strangelove.
You know, just imagine to see him.
At some point, he'd have to fight his arm to keep it from going up in a Nazi salute, you know.
But notice what he was saying people must be forced into collaboration for the fourth industrial revolution, right?
Sounds like when he says fourth industrial revolution, it sounds like he says forced industrial revolution.
And I think that really is the gist of it as well.
You know, when you look at this, he starts out selling transhumanism, moves on to stakeholder capitalism, if you want to call it capitalism.
Rewriting the Definition of Ownership00:13:32
But no, it's a stakeholder of the elites owning everything.
It's all about technocracy, isn't it?
And if you're still thinking in terms of red and blue, of Democrat and Republican, then you've got to move on from that.
That's for the ignorant and the uninformed.
This is really what it truly is about.
And it doesn't even break down neatly between the ideas of fascism and communism either.
It's its own separate thing, technocracy is.
So, how governments and corporations and technocratic systems are quietly redefining ownership in the 21st century.
In other words, how you will own nothing.
There are periods in history, writes Milan Adams, when societies began to discover that the liberties they believed to be permanent were in reality conditional arrangements tolerated only while they remained politically convenient.
Across the Western world, governments are quietly expanding the legal and administrative mechanisms through which private land can be reclassified, restricted, absorbed, or transferred in the name of infrastructure sustainability.
Climate adaptation and economic modernization.
Farming regions are now being surveyed for carbon pipelines.
Financial institutions are purchasing strategic agricultural land at historic levels, while policymakers openly discuss the restructuring of urban life around centralized digital systems, and all of it to control your movements as well.
A number of citizens have begun to suspect that the modern definition of ownership itself is being rewritten in real time.
And what do you call people who own nothing?
But are owned by their masters, right?
Slaves.
So, again, really the path that we're taking to this.
How do we lose ownership of everything?
Well, first of all, we got a government.
If you had an individual, and let's say that you've maxed out your credit card, and so your response is you're going to call up the bank and say, hey, can I get a higher credit limit?
Well, you know, they may give that to you as long as you are making your minimal payments, right?
Paying the interest on it.
I don't know.
I've never tried that.
I don't want to try that.
But, you know, they may do that.
It certainly works when the government does that.
The government max out its credit card and it just wants a higher limit, you know, so they extend the debt ceiling.
No problem.
And people go along with it when they keep buying the government bonds because they're paying the interest on that.
But eventually, what this would lead to and will lead to, just like it would with an individual who keeps going up and up and up on their maxed out credit card, just making the bare minimum payments, but never actually paying anything down.
On the principal owed, eventually, what that does is that leads to bankruptcy.
Then what happens?
Well, they've been thinking about this and they've been planning this for quite some time and they've been making subtle, quiet changes in the background, changes to the UCC code, the Universal Commercial Code, that is at every state level.
And they've been changing the order of liquidation.
I have the unfortunate experience of having been a creditor in a bankruptcy proceeding and I know how that works.
If you are far enough down, you don't get anything.
And they have basically put themselves at the top of the list so that when they spend us into bankruptcy with somebody like Donald Trump, if it isn't Donald Trump, then you will basically own nothing.
I don't know that you're going to be happy about it, though.
I certainly wasn't happy about it.
The modern citizen has been conditioned to believe that private property represents one of the sacred foundations of liberal democracy.
Well, just like free speech, it can just be waved away by these people.
Yet, ownership increasingly resembles a conditional administrative privilege rather than an untouchable natural right, just like speech.
It's impossible to ignore when examining the doctrine of eminent domain.
Disturbing issues as to whether or not property can genuinely be called private if the state ultimately reserves the authority to seize it whenever officials determine.
That a superior public or economic purpose exists.
And again, they tax it continually.
And so that in and of itself makes ownership conditional.
We've had example after example of horrific situations where you had an elderly person living in their home.
They'd been there for so long, they'd paid off the mortgage.
The only expense they had was the taxes.
They got behind in taxes.
And for a small bill, the local government would confiscate their property and take all their equity.
But of course, we have also seen this happening.
It's one of the things I complained about with Donald Trump.
I said, you know, this guy has.
I mentioned it the other day in terms of what he did with that widow.
I showed you the picture of his widow that he wanted the house to expand his parking lot for his casino.
He went to the local government and got them to do it when she refused to let him buy her out.
A 74 year old who had had a stroke and he got her property through eminent domain so he could build and expand his parking lot.
But then his casino went out of business before he was able to actually build the parking lot.
But he got the government to kick her out because Donald Trump doesn't have any respect for any laws, any private property.
He doesn't have respect for speech, anything else.
He doesn't respect our God given rights because he thinks he is God.
If ownership exists only as long as political authorities permit it, then freedom itself becomes conditional.
Governments are now invoking compulsory acquisition powers for semiconductor manufacturing facilities, for renewable energy grids.
For carbon capture pipelines.
This is a thing going across the country.
And guess what?
You know, the people who are involved in those carbon capture pipelines, people like Doug Bergam, Christy Nome, and the guy who owned the company, they were all there in Mar a Lago with Trump.
I mean, they're scheming as how they're going to divvy this stuff up.
Just like the scene from The Godfather where you got that one guy in Miami and he's got a cake that he's cutting and he's handing out the pieces to the various people, right?
That's the way these people are slicing up our country.
These billionaires.
So, what once appeared to be an exceptional legal mechanism reserved for rare circumstances is gradually evolving into a normalized instrument of economic planning.
And again, we saw this with Summit Carbon Solutions.
Those are the people that were working with Doug Bergham, Christy Noam, who wanted to run this carbon pipeline across the country and put it into North and South Dakota.
We also saw that when it was coming through with Keystone Pipeline.
Again, there's been this.
History of this stuff.
We go back to the Kello case that was Kello or Kelso, I can't remember which it was.
It was in Connecticut where they used eminent domain to take property for private business.
But you could go back to Donald Trump, except that that wasn't contested in the courts.
The courts allowed that in the Kello case.
And then you had the next step.
After you go to a step where you have one where a corporation is given your property.
By the government.
The government seizes your property, gives it to a corporation because they say, well, they're going to pay more taxes than you would.
Then you go to the extent of the Keystone Pipeline, which was being built by a company out of Canada.
TransCanada, I think, was the name of the company, if I remember correctly.
But this is a foreign corporation that they were giving the ability to condemn property and to take it by eminent domain.
So you go from a corporation in America taking a property to a corporation from a foreign country.
Being able to come in and move people off of their farmland they've had in their family for 150 years.
And I said at the time, I said, Look, I agree with pipelines.
I think they're great.
I don't want to stop oil, I want to keep it flowing.
And it's one of the safest ways.
Nothing is perfect, but it is one of the safest ways to transport oil and the most efficient ways to transport oil.
But I don't agree with what they were doing with the Keystone Pipeline in terms of condemnation of property.
The backlash became politically severe enough that South Dakota eventually banned the use of eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines just in 2025.
I guess they had to get rid of Christy Nome first.
What a crook she was.
It seems to be a pre qualification.
You've got to be somebody like Christy Nome or Kash Patel or, anyway, it's a whole list of these clowns that are in that administration.
What makes the situation particularly volatile is the emergence of a broader economic philosophy.
That increasingly treats ownership itself as inefficient when compared to centralized management systems.
And again, this is part of the technocracy, right?
We are only going to be concerned with what works, and we are not going to pay any attention to individual rights if they get in the way.
I mean, we've heard Mike Johnson in terms of talking about ICE and search warrants.
It's like, can you imagine if we had to get warrants?
Can you imagine, says the Speaker of the House, the Republican Speaker of the House?
Can you imagine if we had to follow the Constitution?
What a hindrance that would be.
No, we want to have something that is efficient.
Well, you know, the Nazis could make the trains run on time, supposedly.
The question was where were they taking the trains once they put the people in them?
The gradual replacement of independent ownership with conditional access controlled by interconnected institutional authorities with ultimate control over property becomes layered beneath zoning commissions, environmental agencies, taxation systems, redevelopment authorities, financial institutions, insurance corporations.
And emergency regulatory powers.
That's what Trump likes.
He likes those emergencies.
It's now become the executive branch, you now have the emergency branch.
Even in the absence of a coordinated conspiracy, the cumulative effect can still produce the same practical outcome the gradual erosion of truly independent ownership.
There is a property tax revolt that is coming, folks.
People cannot comply with the ever escalating property taxes.
And again, when you look at what has happened to, because of inflation, when you look at what is happening to property prices, that's what squeezed the younger generation out of being able to afford it.
And that is making it difficult for the older generation to be able to sell their homes if they want to, anybody who owns it.
But they can squeeze the people who have gotten into home ownership out.
By escalating the property tax rates.
And this is something that I think is going to be increasingly in view as things get tighter and tighter for Americans.
As a matter of fact, when I talked to Eric Peters last week, he was talking about how our society has slipped to the extent that just going out to a fast food place like Burger King is something that gets extremely expensive, 25 bucks or something.
Travis and his wife just had that experience yesterday.
They were out.
They decided the same thing, just like Eric Peters.
Well, we'll just stop by and grab a burger, you know, at a fast food place.
And they wound up spending 25 bucks off of this.
You know, the inflation, and we're going to see even more of that food inflation because of what Trump is foolishly doing with the blocking of trade many different ways, not just the trade of Hormuz, but with tariffs as well.
Liberty has never been efficient.
Let's remember that, right?
Liberty is not efficient, liberty is not safe, right?
As Jefferson said, always I prefer dangerous liberty.
To the slavery of safety, or something to that effect.
But that is what he should have said if he didn't say it.
Anyway, they always want to sell us safety and they want to sell us efficiency, and they always do that by promising that if we give up our liberty, we'll get safety and efficiency.
That's not true at all.
Genuine freedom depends on the existence of friction, the ability of individuals to refuse, to resist, to delay, to negotiate, to preserve spaces outside of the reach of.
War Economy and Artificial Intelligence00:05:37
Of central planning systems.
The farmer who refuses to sell ancestral land, the homeowner resisting redevelopment pressure, the rancher opposing compulsory easements.
From a purely technocratic perspective, this kind of resistance appears irrational because it slows development and complicates large scale planning objectives.
But from a liberty centered perspective, these acts preserve the final boundary separating ownership from conditional occupancy.
In this sense, the debate surrounding imminent domain extends far beyond legal procedure or infrastructure policy.
It touches the deeper philosophical foundations of a civilization itself.
The long term consequences of this transformation may become even more profound as artificial intelligence, predictive governance systems, and centralized economic planning begin converging into a single unified administrative system.
That's what we're talking about, folks.
And when you look at everything the Trump administration is doing, that points to this centralized single administrative framework.
As I was saying last week, you look at the Genius Act, the Genesis Act, the Clarity Act, and on and on, all these different things they're putting in there in terms of crypto, in terms of artificial intelligence, in terms of identification, so we can protect the children from this or from that.
And even in terms of e verify becoming mandatory and all the rest of this stuff, that is where they're headed.
And all of these things that are being pushed into place by Donald Trump.
And I tell you, the number two person in all this is Marsha Blackburn, the senator, who is going to be the next governor here in Tennessee, most likely.
She is way ahead of anybody else.
And she has been on top of all this stuff, even the Trump AI Act.
She's put that together.
She is an incessant cheerleader for this technocratic agenda that Trump is the point man there to install it.
So, for centuries, governments lacked the technological capacity to monitor property usage, to monitor energy consumption, environmental compliance, financial behavior, demographic movement, and land productivity.
But now they can do it, and they can do it in real time.
So, their lack of being able to do that.
Functioned as a restraint on centralized authority because they had no moral restraint, they had no legal restraint, and now with the technology, they have no practical constraint either.
They're rapidly acquiring precisely these capabilities through these new laws.
And so Brian Lutz says, you know, we're going from a civilian to a military economy.
And this is exactly what a declining empire's economy always looks like.
Empires don't announce their decline, they reveal it in the data.
Rome elevated the military as their empire was decaying, Britain did the same thing after 1914.
And after 1971, when Nixon severed the dollar from gold, America began the same process.
And of course, with the war on drugs, we began militarized policing as well.
March 2026, defense capital goods orders were up 18% month over month.
Year over year, it is a much larger number.
It is now up 80%.
Non defense capital goods, well, they are down 1.2%, which makes it the sixth contraction in seven months.
If you strip out defense production and the headline factory numbers move negative, when you look at our economy, it is basically war and artificial intelligence, which will be used for war abroad as well as against us.
And that is the economy.
That is what the stock market is.
And that is where all the growth has become.
A federal government these days has three ways to pay its bills it can tax, it can borrow, or it can print.
Well, if they wanted to tax us for the $1.5 trillion in defense, again, that's $11,100 per household.
You got that sitting around on the kitchen table?
So that's not going to happen.
They would get pushback against that.
Every empire elevates the military as the civilian economy decays.
Rome did it under Diocletian, the British did it after 1914, America began to do this in 1971.
The Vietnam era proof is the cleanest.
After the war ended, federal government spending kept rising.
The 1969 federal surplus of $3 billion turned into a $23 billion deficit by 1972 with the war winding down.
Now we're talking about a thousand times more.
Isn't that amazing?
In 50 years, go to the deficit that is a thousand times bigger.
The Pentagon's 2027 National Security Request.
Will exceed, now they say in this article, $2.5 trillion, but it's $1.5 trillion unless they're including additional replenishment costs.
The cost of the war in Iran isn't even in that budget.
Pentagon Deficits Thicken Military Power00:02:58
You can see what the printing looks like.
Federal interest expense just crossed a trillion dollar trailing 12 months, and the monetary supply measurement of M2 is heading vertical.
Mises predicted this curve, the Census Bureau is now reporting it.
Eventually, the currency thins out, the military thickens up.
And the middle class evaporates between the two of them.
Weimar, Germany, late stage Rome, the Soviet Union in its last decade.
Each time, the people who held the state's paper currency got wiped.
Each time, the people who held gold got out.
It's one of the few things that you and I can do, and that is to distance ourselves from this criminal financial system designed for confiscation.
And that is to hold physical gold.
Again, you can go to davidknight.gold.
That'll take you to Tony Ardiman.
Think about that.
Seriously, think about it.
What is it that you can do to prepare?
There's a lot of things that you can do to prepare for skills, for growing your own food and that type of thing.
But it's also very important to prepare to protect whatever wealth you have and to begin accumulating that.
You can do that at davidknight.gold.
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
We have a comment here from Jason Barker.
He says, We went to Waffle House the other day, and for myself, my wife, and my grandson, we spent nearly $40.
We used to be able to eat at Waffle House for about four to five bucks for a lot of food.
Well, did you transport to Waffle House?
That's what I want to know.
We had that Trump official who says that he transported to Waffle House.
There's got to be more to that story.
I don't know.
People need to look into that a little bit more.
But yeah, Waffle House, $40.
Wow.
All right.
We'll be right back, folks.
David Knight Show.
If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis in the news, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
Withstanding Zionism Against Foreign Aid00:10:19
Well, we have one week left in this test to see whether somebody who opposes foreign intervention, somebody who opposes foreign aid, Can they withstand the juggernaut of Zionism in this country?
Or are we going to become a Zionist occupied government 100%?
We've already had Jamal Bowman, who was targeted by the Zionists because he opposed support for Israel.
We've already seen him go by the wayside.
They spent about $25 million opposing him.
They've already spent more than that against Thomas Massey.
One week left.
And you know, when I look at Thomas Massey, there's some things that I would criticize him for.
I think he needed to go harder against.
The pandemic and especially against the vaccine and the aftermath of it.
But he's been excellent in terms of fiscal restraint.
He's been excellent in terms of going after the Epstein stuff and, of course, following the Constitution.
And so there's far more that I agree with Thomas Massey on than I would disagree with him on.
Just one week left.
And here's what he had to say about how these Zionists are fighting him.
So, what is the current polling in your race?
It's a single point lead for me.
It's not very fluid.
They've spent.
$10 million against me.
The money poured into this race from outside of Kentucky is basically pushing you to the point of almost losing, and you may lose.
Where'd that money come from?
Well, it didn't come from regular people.
It's come from billionaires, and 95% of it, at least 95%, has come from the Israeli lobby.
So I'll give you their proxies the RJC, which is the Republican Jewish Coalition, AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
Miriam Adelson, Paul Singer, and John Paulson went together.
They funded a pack called MAGA Kentucky, which is neither MAGA nor Kentucky.
But when she had any of them live, who know who are those three people?
They have been.
Miriam Adelson is the gambling magnate who's ironically makes money from the Chinese now gambling and not in Las Vegas.
And she's literally an Israeli.
Yeah.
She was born there.
Yeah.
She's given over $200 million to the president.
He puts her on the stage.
He says that she's influenced his own policy.
And attitudes toward Israel.
And so she's trying to buy a congressional seat in Kentucky along with the rest of these groups that are probably, by the way, getting her money as well.
There's also another interesting faction called Christians United for Israel.
They're really just another wing of AIPAC and RJC that's been used to co opt Christians into supporting their position.
And their position is more war, it's more strife, it's more bombs.
It's send more foreign aid.
And it's a perversion of Christianity, is what it is.
So, the real reason that this race is a serious race and I may lose is because a foreign lobby has fully funded to the extent that they've never done in any Republican race ever before my opponent.
Truly is amazing, isn't it?
And when you look at the massive out of state money, just as we saw with the situation with Frank Nicely, he tried to stop out of state money from coming into Tennessee.
He lost.
There wasn't support within the Republican Party to stop out of state money in state elections.
And then they use that out of state money to come against him.
And the guy who ran against him ran some of the most vile lying ads I've seen.
And that's what they're doing against Thomas Massey as well.
Making implications, he's got some kind of a threesome going on with Ilhan Omar and AOC or something like that.
Let me tell you there is an orgy.
There's an orgy between these Israeli billionaires and Donald Trump.
And it's disgusting to watch it.
You know, the Zionists really stepped this up, not just $10 million, but up to $25 million against Thomas Massey, the most expensive congressional race ever.
Because what this is ultimately about is whether or not a foreign government is going to control our government.
Will AIPAC control the American government?
And again, they did this once before and won against a Democrat, Jamal Bowman.
It wasn't because they opposed any of his policies, but because he opposed aid for Israel.
And as I said at the beginning of the program, what if France or Germany were doing something like this?
What if they got massive subsidies because they bought some politicians?
And then when you had some other politicians that they had not bought, when they questioned that and said, why should France and Germany be getting all this money from our taxpayers?
Well, then what happens is France and Germany come in and they give tens of millions of dollars to run against the people who question that.
So, why isn't it questionable when Israel does this?
Well, part of it is that they pull the wool over people's eyes in terms of their Christian beliefs.
We've had a Christian theology that has been sitting around.
Quite frankly, I never paid much attention to it because when I look at eschatology, folks, so often this is used as divination.
And I've seen this my entire life.
And so I just kind of shut that off.
But it does have consequences because of a bad eschatology.
Because of focusing on the end of times, they have, and doing it in an incorrect way, these people have been lured into this support of some of the most reprehensible war crimes we have seen in our lifetime.
It truly is amazing to see Christians supporting that.
But that's what it is.
To me, I look at these people who focus on prophecy and all the rest of the stuff, I look at them like somebody who's going to the Witch of Endor.
They want to know what the future is going to bring.
You know, it doesn't, even with their theology, make any difference to them.
Their theology is all about what happens to the nation of Israel.
And since they're not Israeli, it doesn't really even concern them.
But they are focused on that 100%.
So again, you got MAGA Kentucky, which is nothing but Zionist billionaires who don't live in Kentucky, as you point out.
You got AIPAC, you got Republican Jewish Coalition.
I wonder if there's any other kind of Republican coalition at this point in time.
You've got the threesome slander.
And so he has responded with an ad showing Paul Singer, one of these Zionist billionaires coming after him, and showed a picture of Paul Singer with a Star of David in rainbow colors behind him.
And one publication said, Oh, that's kind of underhanded.
No, it's not.
I mean, Israel has done more than anybody else to promote LGBT.
Just go back and look at the history of what's happening in Tel Aviv and things like that.
The Star of David itself.
Is a pagan symbol that was co opted by the Zionists in the 19th century, in the 1800s, co opted by them to become their state symbol.
But it is a pagan symbol.
It's not a symbol of the nation, the biblical nation of Israel.
If anything, they would always use the menorah.
This Star of David is a pagan symbol, and it's most likely the star that was referenced as an idolatrous star in the Old Testament.
So Trump endorsed this guy, Galerine, who is afraid to debate Thomas Massey.
Trump traveled to Hebron, Kentucky on March 11th to campaign against Massey, calling him a disaster for our party.
What party would that be?
That'd be the Zionist party, and calling him the worst person.
Well, Galrion, like Trump, is afraid to debate actual issues.
They engage in personal attacks, ad hominem attacks.
Galrion has the backing of the pro Trump super PAC, MAGA Kentucky, which has poured millions into the Andy Massey advertising campaign.
And again, it's all lies.
The 4th District is rated solid Republican, it is an R plus 18.
Heavily Republican.
So that means that whoever wins this is going to be the member of Congress.
And again, is it going to be make America great or is it going to be make Israel great?
Will it be milk America, gut it again?
That's what's going to be happening if the Zionists get control of this.
It is going to be a Zionist occupied government, if ever there was one.
It's kind of interesting.
Also, this week, you had Jack Dorsey, the former owner of Twitter.
He founded Twitter.
He came out, he endorsed Thomas Massey for president.
Well, he's not running for president.
I wonder if.
If Jack Dorsey has helped him in this congressional race.
But, you know, Massey is a libertarian.
He is friendly and responsible to America first.
But, you know, when you look at Jack Dorsey, I don't really know what he's coming at from that.
I have seen John Cleese retweet things that Massey has talked about in terms of Epstein, because in other countries besides the United States, being connected with Epstein is disqualifying and criminal.
Here, it's not a problem.
We're not supposed to pay any attention to it, according to Ben Shapiro.
It's kind of interesting in the UK.
And let me just say this before we stop Fergie, who was the divorced wife of Prince Andrew, she has been now linked to P. Diddy, this rapper rapist that is there, partying with Epstein.
Of course, they met through Jeffrey Epstein.
Think about that.
The royal family, Prince Andrew, Fergie, all of them.
It's one big club, isn't it?
Well, have a good day.
Thank you for joining us.
Common Projects to Own Nothing00:01:07
The common man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidNightShow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.