The David Knight Show - Tue Episode #2081: Trump Orders Jail for Flag Burning

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 26, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:17

Tue Episode #2081: Trump Orders Jail for Flag Burning — First Amendment Shredded

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Let me see.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 26th of August, Year of Our Lord 2025.
	Well, Donald Trump is doing his best to remake our country and his image, unfortunately.
	And so today we're going to begin with some of the novel and unusual things that he's decided to do.
	And actually, some of this may cause people to think.
	and examine and discover, for example, the war that he has now with his Federal Reserve Board of Governors trying to remove Cook, one of the governors.
	He's actually right, she did break the law, but she hasn't been charged and the question is who's got jurisdiction here.
	And she is asserting that she's independent of all this because the Federal Reserve, she says, is private.
	Isn't that interesting?
	Who knew?
	So discovery may be interesting.
	And it also brings up questions about an executive order that Donald Trump wants to have one year in prison for people who burn the American flag.
	What should we do with politicians who burn the American Constitution?
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, Donald Trump yesterday signed an executive order, actually I think it was Monday, yeah Monday that he signed the executive order.
	So today is, what's yesterday?
	Losing track of which day of the week it is already.
	And we're only two days into it.
	I'll only get two to choose from.
	Anyway, he signed the executive order and listen to what he had to say about that.
	Lastly, sir, this is an executive order on flag burning that charges your Attorney General.
	Would you listen to this?
	This is very important.
	Flag burning.
	All over the country, they're burning flags.
	All over the world, they burn the American flag.
	And as you know, through a very sad court, I guess it was a 5-4 decision, they called it freedom of speech.
	But there's another reason, which is perhaps much more important.
	It's called death.
	Because what happens when you burn a flag, is the area goes crazy.
	If you have hundreds of people, they go crazy.
	You can do other things.
	You can burn this pie the American flag, it incites riots at levels that we've never seen before.
	People go crazy, in a way, both ways.
	Trump would never incite a riot.
	There are others that are crazy for doing it.
	There are others that are angry about them doing it.
	Do you want to discuss that?
	Sure.
	What the executive order does, sir, it charges your Department of Justice with investigating instances of flag burning.
	And then where there's evidence of criminal activity, where prosecution wouldn't fall afoul of the First Amendment and instructs the Department of Justice to prosecute those who have ever seen riots or engaged in the process of flag burning.
	And what the penalty is going to be, if you burn a flag, you get one year in jail, no early exits, no nothing.
	You get one year in jail.
	If you burn a flag, you get, and what it does is incite to riot.
	I hope they used that language, by the way, did they?
	Incite to riot.
	Incite to riot.
	And you burn a flag, you get one year in jail.
	You don't get 10 years, you don't get one month.
	You get one year in jail, and it goes on your record.
	And you will see flag burning stopping immediately, just like when I signed the Statute and Monument Act.
	10 years in jail, have you heard any of our beautiful monuments?
	Everybody left town.
	They were gone.
	Never had a problem after that.
	It's pretty amazing.
	We stopped it.
	But this is something that's, I don't know, in a certain way it's equally as important.
	Some people would say it's more important because the people in this country don't want to see our American flag burned and spit on.
	And by people that are...
	They're paid by the radical left to do it.
	You talk to these people, they don't even know half of them, don't even know what they're doing.
	They say, I don't know, they gave me money to do this.
	I see the same things that you do.
	They're bad people.
	They're trying to destroy our nation.
	That's not working because I think our nation now is the most respected nation anywhere in the world by far.
	You saw that with the European leaders on Friday.
	You saw that with NATO where they agreed to go from 2% no pay to 5% fully paid up, trillions of dollars paid, where they respect your president to a level that they jokingly call me the president of Europe.
	They call me the president of Europe, which is an honor.
	I like Europe and I like those people.
	They're good people.
	They call me the president of the world.
	it's crazy.
	And we've never had a case where the 38 European countries were represented, European and other countries were represented, and it was a great meeting.
	But your country is respected again.
	I say it all the time.
	One year ago, our country was dead.
	Everybody said it.
	We had a dead country.
	We were not going to survive.
	Now we have the hottest country anywhere in the world.
	So it's an honor to be involved.
	And this group has a lot to do with it right behind me.
	It's hot.
	It's like the babes at my beauty contest.
	It's one hot country.
	Yeah.
	Well, you could hear that this is something that he's very passionate about.
	And you know, it's kind of interesting to me, Travis, that so many people get so passionate about flags.
	Think about it.
	You know, the Pride flags and the Palestinian flags, Israeli flags, American flags.
	It is something that people are really, really passionate about.
	I'm passionate about principles like the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment.
	That's what I hate to see destroyed, burned, trashed.
	And as Trump was saying, you know, they pay the radical left is paid by these people to do this kind of stuff.
	Who's paying you, Trump, to shut down First Amendment rights of protest and protect a foreign country like Israel?
	They're the ones coming after our First Amendment and you've been their puppetet and you've spat on the Constitution one way after the other.
	What should we do with people like him?
	It's amazing to me.
	Just the fact that he says the riots are triggered by the flag burning and not as an outshoot of a riot that's already ongoing is ridiculous.
	Well, if you listen to his nonsense, it's very similar to the nonsense that was spouted out by Joe Biden and the left about January 6.
	Oh, this is a riot.
	It was an insurrection.
	And it was started by Trump and so forth.
	And if you could blame anybody for starting, it'd be Trump, Alex Jones, whatever.
	But nevertheless, it was not a riot.
	It was not an insurrection.
	I mean, you had some people who went overboard and they could have been punished, but that was not what Biden and the Democrats did.
	They went after people who were just there because they did geofencing and they found the people who were there and they prosecuted them.
	And even, as I pointed out, a situation where two elderly men and one of them's son, they need to go to the toilet and the doors were open there in the Capitol building and they walked over to the police officers and asked them where a toilet is.
	And they said, right inside, go in here.
	They went in there, they used the toilet, they came out and there was a female cop and she tried to direct them onto the house floor.
	I said, no, no, no, we don't want to go further than we just wanted to use a restroom.
	They left.
	They were indicted by Biden.
	And it's this kind of over-the-top nonsense that both Trump and Biden are mere images of each other.
	They're just different clubs, but they think the same way.
	That's why they're both selected to be there.
	It's professional wrestling.
	So, one year in jail, he said.
	No early exits, no nothing, and it goes on your record.
	Oh, no.
	My permanent record.
	You're never going to escape this.
	Yeah, that's right.
	By the way, you know, don't criticize Netanyahu either.
	You know, don't burn Netanyaahu or an American flag.
	Don't burn him with your comets.
	Don't burn him in effigy, for sure.
	Or you're going to get the same kind of treatment.
	This is, they don't care about the fact that Harvard was getting 9 billion with a B dollars worth of taxpayer money from Washington, DC.
	They only care that Harvard was allowing people to protest a foreign country that was paying the politicians like Trump here.
	So the executive order instructs the Attorney General to prosecute those who burn and desecrate the American flag.
	So there we go.
	Here's a new federal crime.
	As I was saying the other day, when we were talking yesterday, when we were talking about the federalization of the police.
	As Reason pointed out, there were only three crimes in the Constitution, which kind of says that they did not envision that the federal government would have police.
	As a matter of fact, nobody had police at the local level.
	You had a sheriff, and you had the community that was armed, and that was how order was kept.
	But now they're inventing crimes to go after people.
	And this is just more of Trump's vendetta.
	He says, this may include, but it's not limited to, this is what the order says, violent crimes, hate crimes, illegal discrimination against American citizens, or other violence.ations of American civil rights.
	Well, those are all crimes in and of themselves.
	And whenever you see this kind of hate speech nonsense, they try to tie it in to things that were already crimes.
	Violent crime has already been a crime.
	And again, it goes back to what Biden did.
	If somebody physically assaults or breaks and enters or destroys property or whatever, like in January 6, some did.
	That was already a crime.
	You don't need to then extend that to everybody who was present, which is what they did.
	So both the Republicans and the Democrats have the ridiculous hate speech rules that are in direct conflict with the First Amendment.
	Militarizing the police force does nothing if you aren't actually going to enforce the laws.
	It's just a tool of oppression at that point.
	We have laws on the books for basically all of these things already.
	They just absolutely refuse to enforce them.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	When people talk about having a constitutional convention, it's like, well, the problem is the politicians.
	And the very politicians...
	Yeah, that's right.
	Let's have a new constitution written by people like Nancy Pelosi and Donald Trump and Mike Johnson who have absolutely no respect for the constitution they sort of uphold as a condition of their authority.
	And so these people ignore it, and you don't want those kinds of people who have no character to write some new controlling document that's going to be the foundation.
	So to the Supreme Court, this was struck down three decades ago.
	1989, there was a Supreme Court case.
	As he said, it was five to four.
	And so some of the conservatives are saying, oh, wait a minute.
	That means that it was all of the conservatives on one side and all the liberals on the other side, and the tiebreaker was Scalia, who stood with the First Amendment.
	And so they said it's not a clear-cut decision at all.
	I remember a time when about the only thing that the left got right was the free speech issue.
	And that was one of the few things that they got right.
	And they did get that right.
	But it was because they were protesting the war and things like that, and they wanted to be able to do that.
	They have now completely abandoned that.
	And many conservatives have as well.
	I was going to point out here, though.
	Some conservatives have gotten a little bit of a spine here to take on Trump and actually talk about the fact that this is in conflict with not only the Supreme Court but actually the Constitution itself.
	Only a few times the Supreme Court got something right.
	And we'll see what happens with that.
	The justices said that the First Amendment protects expressive conduct such as burning the American flag.
	Justice Kennedy in a separate concurrence acknowledged the rulings on popularity, but he wrote, quote, the flag protects those who hold it in contempt.
	And the converse of that is that you've got people like Trump who hold the Constitution in contempt, but worship the flag and talk about desecration and how we should honor this thing.
	It's like a religious relic to them.
	And it is kind of a state religion.
	That's one of the things I guess that's always kind of turned me off with the flag stuff.
	People get so precious about the flag that are their symbols, and that, of course, can be the LGBT people.
	And, you know, they paint their rainbow colors on a crosswalk and then if somebody comes along and protests it by doing a burnout on it That's a hate crime.
	Yeah, don't burn the flag and don't burn out.
	Don't burn out the rainbow crosswalk or you're going to get in trouble.
	But that was a protest as well.
	But these people have their symbols and their symbols are sacred to them.
	It's a religion to them.
	And I guess that's one of the reasons why I could never really get into the Pledge of Allegiance and flags and things like that.
	It was because it was too much.
	I saw the reverence and the religiosity that was being attached to it.
	And it's like, I'm not going there.
	Anyway, they called it freedom of speech, Trump said.
	But there's another reason, which is perhaps much more important.
	It's called death.
	Again, really.
	Death is the reason.
	Yeah.
	He would love to give the death penalty to people who do things that he doesn't like.
	That's the kind of guy that he is.
	How about your executive order for fake emergencies?.
	Death is the reason.
	Burning flags is making you unsafe.
	This order to burn the flag that doesn't protect you burning a flag that doesn't hurt you, that hurt your neighbor.
	So therefore.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And we have to be safe, right?
	So get rid of your liberty because safety comes first.
	And I guess the question is, when we talk about death, this is the guy who killed untold millions of people in this country and the world with his mRNA vaccine that he still touts.
	How does he get off talking about death?
	What hypocrisy?
	So the Chief Counsel of Fire, which is a national free speech group, they work a lot at universities because that's where they really hate free speech there and the Trump administration.
	Fire said, while people can be prosecuted for burning anything in a place that they are not allowed to set fires, the government cannot prosecute protected expressive activity, even if many Americans, including the president, find it, quote, uniquely offensive.
	and provocative.
	And so this has been a pet peave of his for years, talking about flag burning.
	And a lot of people talked about that as well, who said, I would never burn a flag because to them the flag represents things like the First Amendment, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution.
	It's not a club or a power trip like it represents obviously to a Trump.
	That's another thing, it's just the people that generally engage in flag burning are usually the most despicable members of the left wing.
	So it makes it very easy for Trump to come in and do this sort of thing.
	Because you see the type of people that are engaged in it and you go, oh, well, these people need to be punished.
	And that's what it is.
	It's virtue signaling to his base.
	It's professional wrestling, but it's also doing exactly the same thing that Biden did to the J-Sixers.
	He's doing it to the other tribe.
	The order describes the flag as, quote, the most sacred and cherished symbol of the United States.
	What utter nonsense.
	The constitution you swore to, you traitor, that's what is the sacred, cherished symbol of your authority, and you don't have any.
	He calls acts of desecration.
	See, that's why we're talking about this like it's a religious relic.
	I reject the cult of the omnipotent state.
	When I saw that in the Libertarian Party's statement, you know, of principles, they had me right there.
	It's like, you guys get it.
	It is a cult.
	It is a cult of the omnipotent state, and I'm disgusted with that.
	I will not pledge allegiance to that cult.
	Because it's not about the Constitution.
	I pledge allegiance to the Constitution, but not to any of these politicians or these political parties.
	It says it is uniquely offensive and provocative.
	A statement of contempt, hostility, and violence against our nation.
	No, it's against your administration.
	It sounds like nation, doesn't it?
	But, yeah, so the politicians who burned the Bill of Rights should be impeached, at the very least.
	Trump is an international war criminal for what he's done with the MRNA jabs.
	But he will never be indicted even let alone punished in this life.
	Yes, we want to burn the people that or imprison the people that burn the symbol of the country, but not the people that are actually destroying the substance of the country.
	Yeah, the principles and killing people.
	You want to talk about death?
	What hypocrisy.
	So a lot of conservatives, surprisingly, have pushed back on Trump on this, saying this is garbage and mediaite.
	Mediaite, which is a left-wing publication that is always anti-Trump on every issue, picked up the tweets of some people who pushed back on this.
	I'm not even engaging with any of this stuff on Twitter anymore.
	But Casey Maddox said, I anticipate significantly more flag burning in the weeks ahead.
	Jesse Kelly said, I would never in a million years harm the American flag, but a president telling me I can't.
	has me as close as I'll ever be to lighting one on fire.
	I am a free American citizen, and if I ever feel like torching one, I will.
	This is garbage.
	This reminds me of a scene from a Woody Island movie where he is out of his element in New York and he's driving a car like around LA or something.
	I think it was Annie Hall or something.
	And he gets pulled over by a cop and the guy gets real officious with him.
	And so, you know, he finally pulls out his license and he's about to hand it to the cop.
	Well, since you put it that way, he just tears it up.
	That's the way I feel about this order right here.
	What were you going to say, Lance?
	I was just going to say that we have a lot of comments in our chat that are much the same as what you were just saying, people that are so annoyed with this that it's like, I don't burn flags, but if they're going to tell me that I can't in that case, it's more patriotic to do it.
	Yes, exactly.
	It is.
	And that, along with what he's doing with Epstein, guarding his pedophiles, guarding our pedophiles of GOP.
	It also reminds me of that old Far Side comic where the guy is standing on the corner with his wife and he looks up and he sees a sign that says absolutely no chainsaw juggling.
	He says, well, now I really want to.
	Burning the American flag is legal, said Brad Palumbo.
	First Amendment Protected Act, I agree it is offensive, but we do not need safe spaces or coddling from the president, especially one who claims to stand for free speech.
	The telegraph's Nick Gardner called the order brilliant, but Eric Ericsson, I'm surprised that he pushed back, disagreed.
	He said this is actually not brilliant.
	While I agree with the sentiment, he said, it is unfortunately well settled constitutional law that burning the flag is a matter of free speech and the executive does not get to create crimes.
	That's the other part of it.
	Like I said, this is creating a new crime that's not in the Constitution.
	It is a clear violation of the First Amendment.
	I don't think that the Supreme Court decisions are the law of the land, but this is a situation where they actually got it right.
	Scalia, in writing about this, it's actually his son.
	Scalia is dead now, but his son put out a quote from him about this decision.
	Scalia said, You should have no doubt that patriotic conservative that I am, I detest the burning of the nation's flag.
	And if I were king, I would make it a crime.
	King Trump, right?
	This is Scalia from the grave.
	All of these leftists calling him King Trump.
	And that really got to Trump.
	But of course, Scalia had him pegged.
	But as I understand the First Amendment, said Scalia, it guarantees the right to express contempt for the government, the Congress, the Supreme Court, even the nation and the nation's flag.
	And so that is, Ed Whelan says, to the fullest extent possible.
	Sounds aggressive, but it actually means within the bounds permitted by law.
	He is a legal expert and so he's saying it sounds like he's really beating his chest here like he's back at world at the WWE Wrestling.
	But in reality, that's actually kind of a legal climb down.
	So, yeah, other people, Christopher Rufo got it, I think, did not quite get it right.
	He says, I'm sympathetic to the argument that burning the American flag is protected speech.
	But right now, we are putting people in prison.
	for spinning their tires over the Pride flag.
	So it might be a good idea to have the debate about which symbols are sacred to America today.
	Chris, you got it 100% wrong.
	There's no symbols that are sacred if the substance of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is not respected.
	You don't even have a rule of law.
	Instead of saying, well, because they're putting people in jail for the Pride Flag desecration, we should put people in jail for desecrating our symbol.
	That's what he's saying.
	What absolute tribalism.
	That's what's wrong with conservatism today.
	Christopher Rufo, you just showed us exactly what the problem is.
	Oh, well, the left is doing X, which is wrong.
	So we're going to do X as well.
	And of course, that's the same.
	thing that the Democrats do with everything that Trump does.
	As soon as he does the gun control by executive order, La La Harris the next day or so came out and said, I'm going to do the same thing when I become president.
	And so they're mimicking each other and it's the left-right march of tyranny that we see over and over again, especially because of all this tribalism.
	It's really funny.
	You have to be incredibly wrong to give Brad Palumbo a win on anything.
	Brad Palumbo.
	I don't know who he is.
	He's a gay, pseudo conservative commentator got caught on Instagram following an account that was full of nothing but like high school boys sports teams or something and people pointed out he immediately unfollowed and deactivated his account for a while or something like that so he's a weird creepy guy like Colombo one more thing one more underage boy Michael Knowles said it's so clear-cut why was the decision five to four the first time around Even
	stranger, why was it all the liberals plus Scalia on the side defending flag burning while the conservatives led by Rehnquist were on the side defending its prohibition?
	Again, more group think, this time from Michael Knowles, just like you saw it from Christopher Ruffo.
	Yeah, it used to be, like I said before, that liberals respected First Amendment for their own purposes because they had a lot of things that they wanted to protest.
	But many of these conservatives were just fine with things like the drug war, things like the TSA, things like searches without warrants, things like civil asset forfeiture.
	So there's a lot of problems with conservatives not respecting the Constitution.
	And many of the objections here are coming from this kind of quasi-religious dedication to a sacred relic, okay?
	And the tribalism that it represents as well.
	That's what we're talking about.
	Don't burn my Pride flag, don't burn my American flag.
	They hold these symbols as sacred and yet not the principles that we see behind it or the authority for their office.
	So it's now desecrating the American flag.
	He wants to make that a crime.
	That will not hold up.
	One person said there's going to be a lot of people who are doing this out of spite and he goes and there's not any of them are going to have their convictions upheld if they get them, if they're charged by the Trump administration.
	Let's look at what some of the people are saying.
	The first one is Gord Goldsmith.
	Hey Gord.
	Good morning Gord.
	He says, Hi, everyone just burning the flag this morning for heat., cheaper than fuel oil.
	Yeah, especially if you can get it from China.
	Yeah, you can get it real cheap from China.
	It was funny.
	Years and years ago, I remember walking into a Walmart for something and I walked past this, you know, the closing section, there was this giant, giant pair of American flag shorts with a big old tag that says made in China.
	It's like this five X pair of shorts with the American flag.
	It's like, well, if that doesn't symbolize America today, I don't know what the Chinese think about it, so they make it five X. Nights of the Storm says burn a MAGA hat instead.
	That's right.
	There you go.
	That's not illegal yet.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	That's you got the right idea.
	That's where the protest needs to be, focused on MAGA.
	And honestly, that might make people more upset these days than if you burn the American flag.
	That might be a dearer symbol to them.
	Well, they certainly care more about their movement and Donald Trump than they do about the country or the Constitution.
	Yeah, or maybe you can get a Q symbol or something like that.
	Yeah.
	Lou G four Liberty, where are all these flag burning triggered riots?
	Am I missing this activity?
	Yeah, I think we all are.
	As I said earlier, the flag burning doesn't start the riot.
	The flag burning is usually a symptom of a riot in progress.
	Yeah.
	It's the opposite, it's the other way around.
	Dad guy, 24.
	Where is all this flag burning?
	Is there some epidemic of flag burning?ning I'm not seeing.
	Apparently we've all missed it.
	Brandon Bennett, bye bye, First Amendment.
	Yeah, you know, the thing is, you know, we have when when I was in college there was so many riots and all the rest of this stuff and demonstrations and there was flag burning that was happening everywhere and then they started making clothing out of it and I think that was actually kind of a protest as well, but then, you know, now that's become a thing, you know, like you pointed out, kind of.
	It's everywhere.
	Lou G for Liberty again says, this will dovetail with his anti Semitic speech law.
	Soon you're not going to be able to burn an Israeli flag either.
	Yeah, well, certainly not in Harvard.
	Because they're going to turn, they want their nine billion dollars, and so they're going to do whatever Israel says, just like Trump will do whatever Israel says.
	That's right.
	Geesebusters, good to see you, Geesebusters.
	Hope you're doing well.
	He says, burn Trump flags.
	That's right.
	Brandon Bennett, I have a flag in the back seat of my car, and I love my country, and for some reason now I want to burn it.
	Absolutely no chainsaw jongling.
	Mama C, 1996.
	Now I know I'll get rid of that flag in my basement.
	Now I know how I'll get rid of the flag in my basement.
	I've been storing.
	Possum King.
	BlackRock is buying up utility companies.
	They're buying up everything.
	There's nothing BlackRock isn't getting into.
	Yeah, they're going to burn down our society and he's fine with that.
	Well, you know, they're probably his good buddies over there.
	Oh, they are because he wanted to give them the Panama Canal.
	I haven't heard anything about that for a while, have we?
	You know, Panama Canal and Canada is the fifty first state in Greenland.
	I mean, this guy is just one traveling, you know, conflict wrestling show.
	He didn't go for the canal.
	Maybe we can take Greenland.
	No, not Greenland, Canada, maybe Canada.
	Ah, I don't know what they want.
	He learned very well at the, at the, uh, behest of McMahon in terms of WWE.
	They were close friends and he knew exactly how to keep the public's attention.
	Luigi for Liberty, to properly dispose of a flag, you burn it.
	Yeah, isn't that right?
	Yeah, I don't know.
	After it's been used for a long time and it's old and dirty, I think they burn it in the military, but in a sort of ceremony.
	Yeah.
	On a pyre or something.
	Bulldog.
	Flags are a form of idolatry.
	People worship flags.
	They should worship God's words.
	Yeah.
	That's what I feel about it.
	I hate this religious air to all this stuff, right?
	Only secular state and cult.
	Christ is the only king one that's worthy of worship.
	But Trump thinks he is king.
	And Scalia nailed him.
	If I were king, or if I were somebody like Trump, who thinks that he's king, I would do this exactly same thing.
	He knew him.
	Assyrian girl.
	Of course, Trump will uphold the flag over the Constitution.
	He marches under the flag and sees it as a source of power.
	The Constitution only holds him back.
	Yeah, it's a source of constraint.
	It's like that picture where he's hugging the flag and kissing it.
	You know, it's like, you remember that?
	That's a Yeah.
	They're burning my girlfriend.
	Why would they do this?
	Karen Carpenter, 27.
	AG.
	I wonder if Trump is selling a Trump-American flag made in China, of course.
	Oh, I'm sure.
	I'm sure there must be.
	Oh, yeah.
	From burning the First Amendment, which is what he's really doing, to essentially bringing corporate socialism in a MAGA hat, which is the way that it is described by Reason magazine.
	Trump says he paid zero for the government's $11 billion stake in Intel.
	But he's wrong.
	He paid for it, and it is a very dangerous and evil idea, one that, by the way, has been floated by Bernie Sanders.
	This is why I said, you can take a New York City Democrat like Trump out of New York, but you can't take the socialism out of him.
	It's all burned in there.
	We overthrow elected governments in Iran for doing the same thing, didn't we?
	In Iran, they took over the elected government there back in, what was it, 1953, I think?
	1953, in Operation Ajax.
	Yeah, they elected a guy that wanted to nationalize the oil industry that was there.
	So they did a coup and they took this guy out and they put in the Shah of Iran, which primed the country in terms of blowback that we wound up with the Ayatollah.
	Trump negotiated a deal last week for the U.S. government to take a substantial ownership stake in an American company, says Reason.
	Despite his assurances, Trump's socialistic transaction is a terrible deal, not only for the parties involved, but for the entire U.S. economy.
	And just like what he is doing with the military as police in D.C. and saying he's going to do that.
	in one city after the other, he has also said that he is going to do this with other companies and other industries as well.
	He is trying to remake our country.
	He sees himself as some kind of an FDR or Lincoln.
	And I quite agree with him on that.
	I think he is like FDR or Lincoln.
	And I would consign them to the hell that's reserved for these types of politicians.
	So when I went and got my haircut, the barber shops in this area tend to be fairly conservative.
	On the wall they had a painting and it was Donald Trump, Abraham Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan sitting in barber chairs getting their haircuts.
	And I was like, yeah, that's about right.
	Well, at least they were probably what they were probably doing was passing cards to each other with their toes like the dogs waiting poker.
	It's my great honor to report the US is now fully owned and controls ten percent of Intel, he said, on his social media thing, he said, and I paid zero for Intel, all uppercase screaming.
	It's worth approximately $11 billion.
	All goes to the USA.
	Why are stupid people unhappy with that?
	How much is this going to cost the American people?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	There's no such thing as a free lunch, but a...
	Under terms of the agreement, the U.S. government will make an $8.9 billion investment in Intel common stock, said the company.
	The government's equity stake will be funded by the remaining.
	five point seven billion dollars in grants previously awarded but not yet paid to Intel under the US Chips and Science Act and three point two billion awarded to the company as part of the Secure Enclave Program.
	The eight point nine billion dollar investment is in addition to the two point two billion dollars in chips grants Intel has received to date, making for a total investment of eleven point one billion dollars.
	You see, the chips thing is an idea that was put out there by Biden and by Bernie Sanders where we're going to have the government start to subsidize these industries and that's a big part of the problem.
	These grants were approved under Biden.
	Before leaving office, Biden's administration rushed to finalize these grants even as Intel was the worst performing tech stock in 2024.
	Malinvestment is always one of the harbingers of socialism.
	They always, I wouldn't say harbinger, is actually one of the characteristics of socialist governments.
	They always malinvest the money that they put in.
	So the government actually agreed to less than initially allocated when the company failed to hit certain milestones.
	But instead of rescinding those grants as Trump reportedly threatened to do, instead he demanded a tenth of the business as a result making the U.S. government Intel's largest shareholder.
	180 degree flip-flop like he did with Epstein and the documents, right?
	I'm going to get rid of that CHIPS Act and these subsidies, he tells the Conservatives.
	who should be opposing this stuff but don't because it's Trump and then he turns around and does the same thing the CHIPS Act funding was first floated by Bernie Sanders Trump and his allies are now issuing talking points that could have come from the socialist senator himself because they are socialists themselves.
	They're fascists economically.
	The U.S. government insists on dishing out taxpayer money to private companies.
	If they do that, is there any reason that it shouldn't, as a U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick says, get a piece of the action?
	This guy is the poster child for corrupt, crony capitalism.
	that is really in the mold of the Chinese Communist Party, Lutnick and the people in the Trump administration.
	The most immediate risk that Intel's decisions will increasingly be driven by political rather than commercial considerations, said Scott Lenna Lenna Kikomi of the Cato Institute.
	I'm not sure how to pronounce his last name, so I'll just refer to him as the Cato Institute.
	As I've said before, when you merge government with religion, what you wind up with, or church or whatever, what you wind up with is government.
	When you merge government with corporations, what you wind up with is government.
	Government always smothers and destroys whatever you think is going to come in and help.
	He said, with the U.S. government as its largest shareholder, Intel will face constant pressure to align corporate decisions with the goals of whatever political party is in power.
	The same way that when you ally government with churches, the churches will feel the pressure to align with the politicians.
	And they will also be rewarded if they do and punished if they don't.
	So again, when you mix a company, a corporation with politics, you're going to wind up with a political company that is going to be making these decisions not based on economic reality or the desires of customers, no, the government.
	becomes their customer.
	Intel's U.S.-based competitors might find themselves at a disadvantage when buying for government contracts or subsidies, winning trade or tax relief or complying with federal regulations.
	Private capital might in turn flow to Intel and away from leaders in innovation in the semiconductor ecosystem.
	Not for economic reasons, but because Uncle Sam now has his thumb on the scale.
	picking the winners and the losers.
	White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told CNBC on Monday that he is, quote, sure at some point there'll be more transactions, if not in this industry, then in other industries.
	And as I said, the beginning of this is just like the military police and DC.
	Now we're going to go to other cities, and they're going to go to other companies, other industries, and they're going to start becoming partners and taking over chunks of them just like the Chinese Communists did.
	And guess what?
	Just like in Chinese Communist Party, you're going to have the leaders of the government are going to be making special money off of this stuff.
	You talk about insider trading.
	They're going to be getting kickbacks and everything else.
	Trump has made several such deals just since re-entering office in January.
	Of course, you know, leaning on NVIDIA and AMD, we've never ever had the federal government take a share in a corporation like this before.
	And we've never had the federal government putting an export tax as they've done on NVIDIA and AMD.
	You know, all of this stuff about tariffs was supposed to be because we were going to have help manufacturing, and that means helping exports in this country.
	And now Trump is putting an export tax on what is produced in this country.
	It's absolutely insane and inconsistent.
	Everything he does.
	And of course, he bought into a rare earth mineral mine in the U. S. M. P. Minerals, four hundred billion dollars government investment made by the Department of Defense, which is now its largest shareholder.
	I will make deals like that for our country all day long, said Trump, because I don't support the Constitution, right?
	Anyway, the Republicans won't likely be in power forever.
	In time, a Democrat president will have the same influence on Intel and on other companies and other industries.
	And here's the key takeaway from this.
	I like this quote.
	An economist at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Ryan Young, said, both parties are forgetting a cardinal rule of politics.
	Don't give yourself powers that you don't want your opponents to have.
	How many times have I said that?
	You know, look at what Trump is doing.
	When he goes out and he does gun control by executive order, that's a power that he's put on the table now for law law to pick up and use.
	And they do that over and over again.
	So don't give yourself powers that you don't want your opponents to have.
	So as this is all happening now Trump is working on commandos going to Mexico and Ken Klippenstein has been the one who has been reporting on this and he has a very long article about time that he has spent people he's talked to at Special Operations Command North these are people who were previously working on the Arctic keeping that secure from the Russian threat I guess and Al-Qaeda.
	You never know when Al-Qaeda is going to show up in the Arctic.
	And so now they've been repurposed.
	They've been up there looking for a mission because nothing is happening up there, right?
	So I didn't justify it.
	And I'm telling you that the cartels are going to start attacking infrastructure here or politicians or whatever.
	And if they don't, I think that the Trump administration and the people in power in Washington will do a false flag to say that it's from them so they can roll out this plan that I showed yesterday that the Pentagon's been talking about how the coming wars are going to be fought in the cities against civilians.
	Trump designated international cartels as enemy number one.
	The Arctic was traded for Mexico.
	Northern Command, officially responsible for the defense of America, was established in November 2013, long after 9-11.
	And unfortunately for them, every other geographic fighting area had already been taken.
	So they had to go to the Arctic.
	But now they get to go to Mexico.
	So lacking terrorists to kill or counterinsurgencies to fight, SOC North was assigned every task under the sun.
	a roller coaster of missions that somehow contributed to, quote, defending the homeland against unconventional threats.
	On the walls of the new headquarters were maps of the Arctic Circle from Alaska to Greenland in the midst of SOC North planners or commandos, meaning Russian spetsnats as they made their way south through the ice.
	Then came Trump, and the Arctic maps were rolled up and put away as the border and Mexico became the top priority.
	Defending America would no longer be ephemeral or contingency plans set in some mythical future.
	The military was ordered to deal with the immediate threats of illegal immigration, drugs, and cartels.
	We're going to take a quick break and we come back.
	You're going to see that the Defense Department, this is another thing that Trump wants to do, he wants to take it back.
	to the war department.
	And so we're going to talk about that when we come back.
	It's actually a little bit of truth in advertising, as Lance said when we talked about it.
	We laughed about it.
	And it's a bit more truthful to call it the war department.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Wait a minute, where am I?
	Sorry, Jefferson.
	The scoundrels who put America on central bank fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
	Despicable.
	This is outrageous.
	Washington, I spent my life fighting centralized power.
	Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
	Tell me, there's some good news to all this.
	Well, there is a coin they can't control.
	One that isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed up.
	The all new David Nightshow commemorative coin.
	Now, Patriots can support a show that won't sell out with a limited edition coin that sure will sell out quickly.
	They say money talks, and this coin has something to worth listening to.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	Well, it looks like we have an interesting thing that's going to be coming up.
	We have a battle to take over the Federal Reserve that Trump is involved in, and he's been trying to find a cause to remove Powell.
	I talked about this last week, trying to invent a crime in terms of what he had to say to Congress about the remodeling of the Federal Reserve, which in and of itself, I think it's a crime to spend that kind of money.
	But because he got some of the details wrong, they want to come after him on the details, even though nobody in Congress cared about James Clapper lying to you about surveillance of the American people.
	But now he has a real crime, as I also said at the time, this female governor, black female, first one to be in the Federal Reserve, and her name is Cook, and she took out two loans almost at the same time.
	I think they were two months apart.
	And in both of them, she said they were going to be her primary residence, except one of them was in Georgia and the other one was in Georgia and the other one was, I think, Michigan or Minnesota, something like that.
	So it was a lie about one of them.
	As a matter of fact, the one in Georgia, she then put up for rent.
	So there's a paper trail that shows that she lied on her mortgage fund.
	The question is, is this something that the federal government is going to be involved in?
	I don't know who actually has jurisdiction there.
	She has not been charged and she's denying that she did anything wrong.
	So she's also a liar.
	But think about the fact that you got these central banks.
	Yeah, you got one of these people in charge of the bank of banks here, the central bank.
	And they're lying on their mortgage application, which is a crime for other people to do it.
	So she says that she has not been charged with a crime.
	She didn't commit a crime.
	And she says, I'm not leaving.
	Trump has sent her a notice that she has now been, I don't know, relieved of duty or however phrased it or whatever.
	But it's going to be interesting, this back and forth.
	And she, in making her case, says, well, we're private.
	You have no jurisdiction over me.
	So I think it's going to be an interesting discovery as part of this.
	A lot of people are like, wait a minute, what?
	What do you mean?
	Conspiracy theorists who said the Federal Reserve was private, and now you've got one of the board of governors who is going to make a big fight with Trump over it being private.
	And it'll be interesting.
	Of course, the left will come out and say, Yeah, it's private, and that's a good thing.
	That's what we need.
	We've got a lot of comments here.
	Shabri says that sacred piece of cloth has more rights than the people talking about the flag burning.
	That's right.
	NDPIO says, Listen to what they say.
	Don't pay attention to what they do, and you'll be happy.
	That's right.
	Just trust what they say.
	Ignore their actions.
	Turn your brain off, and it'll all be fine.
	Nights of the Storm.
	Good to see you, Jason.
	Hope you're doing well.
	I foresee that by the end of the day there will be a trend of flag burning videos on Twix, Twitter slash X. We'll have to wait and see.
	Malutin Melenkovich, bailing out Intel was a horrible idea.
	It's just a grift for Israel.
	Is Intel an Israeli company?
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	They've got an Asian CEO, I think, that he criticized, that's the lead up to all this stuff.
	And that was softening them up for the takeover, because if you push back against Trump, you know that you're in his sights.
	Yeah.
	He makes it very clear who he's going after.
	He's not subtle.
	High boost.
	How did Trump buy Intel with what money?
	Was there money in the 666 bill to buy private industries?
	Who sits on the board?
	Is there a conflict of interest when the government sets laws and owns a company?
	Yeah, there is.
	Yeah, there's absolutely no way.
	Again, if we go back to the ninth and tenth amendment, there is no authority for the government to do this, so therefore they don't have that authority, and it's a bad idea because it is socialism, as we see put out there by Bernie Sanders.
	And socialism does not lead to good outcomes.
	Nights of the Storm, so my taxes are paying for processors, but I can't afford a decent video card for my PC.
	That's absolutely the case, yeah.
	He says, All the money will go to the few people and you'll own nothing, not even a PC, right?
	You'll get one of the you'll get a Chromebook from now on.
	I was a big AMD fan back in the 2000s, half the price of a Pentium and faster.
	Birdhouse Blues, does this help or hurt Elon's Neuralink chip design?
	What were you going to say once?
	Not AMD?
	Oh, just, well, I guess he's comparing it to Pentium, but just the whole thing of AMD versus Nvidia when people get all tribal about one or the other, and then they're run by the same family.
	The same family owns them.
	They're run, the CEOs are cousins.
	Yeah.
	Well, you're going to end up like in China, where the same, quote, family, the mafia, is going to own everything of any importance.
	Never go against the family.
	Nibiru 2029, Emperor Trump's main goal is to destroy the USA, just as he's destroyed every business he's ever pilfered.
	Yeah.
	Well, he's doing a good job.
	Yeah.
	SoloCat 1980, The Yankee Pledge of Allegiance is a oath to an idol, a double sin.
	That's right.
	And you realize that when, you know, they softened it.
	By the time I was in school, they softened it in the 1950s.
	They added under God.
	But if you take that out of the pledge of allegiance, you have, and it was put together by the Grand Army of the Republic, which was the kind of the union of the union soldiers who, you know, it's kind of their club.
	And, you know, it's one nation, indivisible, right?
	And you're pledging allegiance to that.
	And they wanted that, and they wanted the government schools to teach their version of history.
	And just prior to World War II, the protocol was that you were.
	to do the pledge with your right hand extended out, palm down.
	Does that look familiar?
	That's like a Nazi salute, right?
	So they changed that to put your hand over your heart, right, because of the Nazis.
	And then in the 1950s they added under God to soften it.
	But we know where it came from and we know what the spirit behind it is.
	It's not often that you have to retire a gesture, you know?
	But the Nazis got rid of that one.
	You can't name someone Adolf anymore, you know?
	They managed to get rid of quite a few things.
	Yeah.
	Solo Cat, oh no, Defy Tyrant, 1776.
	Ron DeSantis implementing a new Stand with Israel license plate with Star of David on it.
	Wonder who is ruling over us.
	Wow.
	It's going to be an extra penalty to rear end that one because I'm destroying the Star of David.
	Yeah, the Rothschilds won't like that, right?
	It's not just a rear ending, it's also a hate crime.
	I'm calling my lawyer right now.
	Solo Cat 1980.
	Because the left called Trump a fascist early on without reason, he is now inoculated against the accusation now that he is a fascist.
	Yeah, yeah.
	That's right.
	They've been screaming it for years at this point, and the left considers anyone right now of Stalin a fascist?
	It's very reminiscent of Herbert Marcuse.
	His entire thesis was that if you're not continually pushing leftward, you are immediately in danger of falling into fascism.
	So anyone that does not push further and further left immediately has to be attacked as a fascist.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And as Solicat said, that is inoculating him.
	That's the real vaccine.
	And then he's got this vaccine.
	They tried to impeach him and failed.
	So he's safe from that.
	They ran him through the court system and inoculated against any sort of criminal prosecution because of that.
	They've been screaming fascists, so now when he's doing fascist things, people are like, ah, whatever.
	And they've inoculated him from being impeached as well.
	I mean, the Democrats could come out and they could impeach him for a lot of the unconstitutional things that he's done.
	This is just the latest one.
	But, you know, they could come after him for some real substantive charges.
	But because they came after him for a bunch of nonsense the first time, he's been inoculated against impeachment like that as well.
	And the tribe will fall in line behind him in support.
	He's speaking about how the leftists move all this stuff.
	students have to pretend to be leftist in order to succeed this is a northwestern university survey that was done they surveyed 1452 interviews with students at several different colleges over a period of two years, 88% said that they pretended to hold more leftist views than they truly endorsed to succeed socially or academically.
	I mean, is it a surprise to anyone at this point that the colleges are extremely biased and controlled by hardcore leftist interests?
	Yes.
	But this is kind of the human nature.
	This is why Rod Dreyer wrote his book, Live Not By Lies, which was a title that Solthe Nitson had for his final essay before he was kicked out of the Soviet Union, Live Not By Lies.
	And in that, Sulzanitsyn said, because of pressure from above and because of peer pressure, the Milgram experiment and the Ash experiment, because of those kinds of pressures, we live by lies.
	But just don't believe them yourself.
	At the very least, if you don't have the courage to push back against that, at least don't start to believe it yourself because you realize that as you and so did the left.
	It's this whole thing about the more you repeat this stuff, eventually you can get yourself to believe it, double think, and they simulate you that way.
	I also think it has to do with the fact that college is so expensive.
	If you're paying this much money for something you don't believe in, that you're going to psychologically reject that on some level.
	You're going to have to start rationalizing, like there's got to be something here that's truthful and of value.
	I mean, it's tuition has just exploded.
	I said before when I went to USF back in the late 70s, my books cost more than my tuition did.
	I had to have a lot of books and even buying them used, it was more than the tuition.
	But the government has subsidized tuition to get it so expensive.
	Anytime the government subsidizes something, it gets more expensive.
	And the first exhibit of that is what's happened to tuition at colleges.
	But this is also nothing new.
	When I was in college, I had to take some core courses, and I don't even remember what the subject was, but the very first class, the guy got up and started lecturing us about how wonderful Marx and Lenin were.
	And it wasn't a course on Marxist and Leninist ideas.
	It was not supposedly a political course, but he was going to make it a political course.
	And so I just walked straight out of there, the first class and dropped the class, just removed it because it's like, there's no way that I'm going to play his game and I know that he's going to flunk me.
	And that's what these students are saying.
	78% of the students said that they self-censored their beliefs surrounding gender identity.
	72% do it on politics, 68% on family values.
	More than 80% said that they had submitted classwork that misrepresented their views in order to align with professors.
	For many, this has become second nature, an instinct for academic and professional self-preservation.
	And that's what Rod Drayer said in the preface to his book.
	He said he'd had people who had emigrated to America from Eastern Europe, and they had come from communist countries and totalitarian countries.
	And they were very concerned about what they were seeing in America, that people were self-censoring themselves.
	And Rod Dreher, who's working in academia, I think, he said, I've had other people say that.
	They will speak in hushed tones when they're in a restaurant, thinking that somebody is going to hear them, that knows them, and is going to get them in trouble at the university.
	And it's like, I don't want anything to do with a system that's like that.
	It's a totalitarian, Marxist system, and it has thoroughly permeated the universities.
	When it comes to gender ideology for example 87% of students identified as heterosexual and said that they believe that there are only two genders 77% said biological sex not gender identity should be recognized in areas like sports healthcare or data collection but they would never voice these opinions in public this is what's so wrong about our university system that is so heavily subsidized by the government So what are they?
	They're literally living by lies.
	Yeah, they truly are.
	It's a way of life.
	So a lot of back and forth about Trump's hands and of course., if you can find that article there and pull up the picture, he had a few days ago, very awkwardly, it looks like evidently he did it himself because he didn't even try to blend it out, but he tried to cover up a bruise on his hand.
	And then he showed up in the office as he's doing these executive orders about flag burning with no makeup on.
	He's got his...
	Well, look at those pictures.
	People are saying, oh, yeah, he's dying and all the rest of stuff.
	It's like, I saw that on my dad for the longest time.
	He was on blood thinners.
	he had cardiac issues.
	He'd had a blood clot when, So they kept him on blood thinner.
	All of my, the whole time I knew him, he was on blood thinner and he would get bruises that would look like that, that were very bad, just over nothing.
	He didn't even remember hitting anything.
	And so, you know, there may be some, they've already said that he has some circulatory issues, which obviously are the case with his swollen ankles.
	And he's 78 years old, but anyway, both his friends and enemies are getting all excited about this.
	A lot of speculation about it.
	I think that it is.
	It is, and he's got it on his other hand as well.
	This is just something that is part of old age that is there.
	And the real issue is not his hand.
	I think they've talked more about his hand than they have the executive orders that he signed with a bruised hand.
	And that's the problem that I have with him.
	Yeah, I'm looking at the picture further down this article where they're comparing the ankles of Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.
	Is it just because I think this is where we are.
	This is wow.
	We're doing forensic analysis on the ankles of world leaders.
	Look, Putin's in very normal anklkle, Trump's thick and swollen ankles.
	What does this say?
	Which community?
	The authoritarian world leader has the best ankles.
	Yeah, that's exactly what they've tried to do.
	So Trump's physician says that the bruising is consistent with minor soft tissue irritation from frequent handshaking and the use of aspirin.
	That's not true.
	There's something else going on and it's probably one of these blood thinning medications that are there.
	People are just so eager to shake his hand that they go a little overboard.
	It's everyone always wanting to shake his hand one after another.
	This happens all the time.
	Remember when Trump got into that arm wrestling thing with Macron in his first term?
	He shakes his hand and the two of them are grimacing and Macron starts laughing about it.
	So, yeah, he likes to give people really firm handshakes as a sign of how powerful he is, I think, as part of that is the ego.
	But, yeah, that is what they do focus on.
	But this is finally, before we just kind of general news here, before we get into something else, he's talking about changing the Department of Defense to make it the Department ofpartment of War until 1949.
	And so after World War II, we created the National Security State, which has not provided security for the nation.
	Instead, what it has done is got us involved in one war after the other that we were not attacked.
	And so they've been using the military as an international police force.
	And it's not about the defense of this country.
	But we were talking about it and we were laughing about it.
	As Lance said, well, at least they're going to be honest about it for a change, because that's what it truly is about.
	It's not about defending this country.
	It's simply about getting us involved in wars and that's not how you defend a country you defend the country by keeping us out of wars but since they're so focused on wars i thought it was kind of indicative of the lies that we've been told by the pentagon since world war two and you know this they called the defense department and all the rest of the stuff but it reminds me of Dave Chappelle's routine of what he said about Trump he said This guy is truly amazing.
	He says he'll come out of these enclaves where these elites are, right?
	And he'll tell you, you won't believe what they're talking about doing in there.
	And he'll tell you all the stuff they're going to do.
	And then he said, and then the SOB will go back in and do it himself.
	He'll join them after he tells you what they're actually doing.
	And I thought, that's exactly right.
	So he's going to tell us, yeah, it's the Department of War, and we're going to have some more wars.
	It's not the Department of Peace.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about what's going on with Israel.
	There's some information that's come out.
	Of course, there's also been a couple more attacks.
	And there's not really any question, folks, that it is genocide.
	Their own statistics at the IDF, the Israeli Defense Force, show that it is a genocide.
	And you probably manipulated those as well to make it look not quite as bad as it is.
	Before we jump out to the serious topic, so let's finish off the comments that we have.
	Don't frag me, bro, because PCs are going to go away when the net required biometric access.
	The PC will be a dummy terminal and all apps will be remotely served, all data saved only online.
	That's what they were.
	Alien Poop Evolution, you can build awesome PCs to rent video games on.
	That's right.
	You're not going to own anything.
	The Knights of the Sea.
	The Digital version of the Own Nothing and Be Happy agenda.
	Yeah.
	Except that video games are so important bad you can't even be happy anymore.
	Knights of the Storm was responding, Don't frag me bro.
	I went, I went to get a LAN card at Walmart about a year ago and they didn't have hardly any PC parts available.
	Everything was for tablets or cell phones.
	Slash accessories, yeah.
	People No Radio Shack anymore.
	Actually, there is a Radio Shack nearby in Sevierville.
	That's where I had to send my wife out.
	She was out running errands and one of the cables that got shipped here was faulty.
	So she went and picked it up at Radio Shack.
	I wonder if they sell any components that you built stuff from.
	That's the thing.
	They mostly just sell like phone accessories these days.
	There was that one Radio Shack in Texas that had the sign for Radio Shack, at least for a while, but it was owned by a local mom and pop that had components.
	But every other Radio Shack is just some...
	And so, you know, people just started getting circuits that would do functions as opposed to, you know, we used to.
	do wire wrap boards where we would get sockets and we'd put the components in the sockets and we'd connect them all using wire wrap because you could undo that pretty easily rather than solder.
	Yeah, but that stuff is gone.
	Places like Fries Electronics and there was that, like I said, one small mom and pop shop that closed right before we moved out of Texas that had like Arduino and other hobbyist stuff.
	Yeah.
	Like Fries carried.
	And all that is now gone.
	You can only get that online anymore.
	I don't think there's a Fries.
	Pretty sure they went out of business.
	Yeah.
	Oh, you think they went under?
	I think they all went under.
	Yeah, probably because they were some of the components.
	Yeah.
	Probably because of the lockdown of Trump, yeah.
	It all, it's all going away.
	Bulldog.
	The governments want you worshiping them.
	Wait until the United Nations makes it mandatory.
	That's right.
	Audi MRR, good to see you, Audi.
	Hope you're doing well.
	I'm on retro radio.
	Yeah.
	I just saw an article at MSN that Memphis, Tennessee is among the cities that President Trump intends to send more troops to resolve high crime.
	Of course, it's run by Democrats.
	As I predicted over a year ago, Trump has turned the US into a perpetual police state occupied by, need to scroll that down, Lance, occupied by its own military, and it will never cease.
	That's right.
	Once they take the power, they're not going to give it back.
	Nibiru 2029.
	It's all right to rear end that Florida license plate as long as you have a rainbow symbol on your vehicle.
	That's right.
	You need a gay license plate up front if you're going to hit the Israeli is license plate in the back.
	It gives us one diversity points.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Well, Israel has done a double tap strike on Gaza's Nasser hospital, killing journalists and then also rescue workers.
	And when you talk about a double tap strike, do you remember the video called, they called it collateral murder.
	It wasn't collateral damage, but it was collateral murder.
	The video of the people in the gunship, I think it was maybe a C-130 ghost ship or something, but they had recorded the video where first they shot up an area where there was a guy, a cameraman, and they recorded that.
	and then they waited until the clearly marked ambulance came and as they grabbed the cameramen and other people who had been shot in the first attack, they then put them in the ambulance and then they shot up the ambulance.
	And that was leaked by WikiLeaks.
	And that really was the thing that set the government on fire to go after Julian Assange.
	They called it collateral murder.
	Well, similar thing just happened.
	The Associated Press said the initial strike was at 1010 a.m.
	Gaza time hit the fourth floor of the the hospital, which was a surgical operating room and a doctor's residences, killing at least two people.
	Once rescue workers and journalists arrived at the scene, a second strike hit, killing eighteen more people, a double tap attack that was caught on video.
	The Israeli outlet nine hundred seventy two magazine published the investigation last month that said the IDF has adopted using double tap strikes as a standard procedure in Gaza.
	They said the video of the double tap strike on Nasser Hospital is footage of murder, quote unquote.
	Again, collateral murder.
	According to Reuters, the initial strike killed one of its contractors, a cameraman, who was killed near a live broadcasting position operated by Reuters on the upper floor of the hospital.
	And this is an article from antiwar.com.
	They said they have a photo account with Reuters, and they've used many of this photograph to this guy and his work.
	The Israeli newspaper Heretz reported that the Israeli military said that the initial strike targeted a camera.
	which they claimed was a Hamas camera that was being used to observe IDIA forces.
	They say that Israeli tank shells struck the area.
	Then another one was fired to make sure the camera was destroyed.
	Netanyahu later claimed that the double tap strike was a tragic mishap.
	So first they said, yeah, it was people who were taking pictures for the other side, you know, just like at Harvard or whatever.
	The other four journalists who were killed in the Israeli attack on the hospital were mentioned here, freelancers for Associated Press or for some of them work for Middle East Eye or Al Jazeera or whatever.
	But Israeli forces killed 64 Palestinians in Gaza.
	over 24 hours, the last 24 hours.
	This is a running update that's done every day on antiwar.com.
	If you go there, you can see how many dozens of people have been murdered the last day in terms of civilians.
	Israeli forces killed sixty four Palestinians, wounded two hundred and seventy eight over the previous twenty four hour period as relentless US backed Israeli attacks continue across the strip.
	Among the dead were nineteen Palestinians killed while attempting to get food at the aid sites.
	And Netanyahu has, it's now been reported from an Israeli newspaper, that he has shut down seven ceasefire deals, deals that have been agreed to by the other side, and yet he's shut them down, including very early on when they could have released hostages.
	This is one of the reasons why you have so many people in Israel who are protesting Netanyahu.
	Over the course of the war in Gaza, Israel has repeatedly dug up roadblocks to ceasefire deals with Hamas, even when the Palestinian group accepted its conditions.
	According to senior American and Israeli officials interviewed by the program, Israel blocked a ceasefire agreement and the program is Israel's Channel thirteen Investigative Program.
	Israel blocked the ceasefire agreement on seven different occasions.
	during nearly two years of its devastating military campaign against Gaza, officials said Netanyahu was chiefly responsible, often bowing to pressure from far right ministers, including Bezal Smotric and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir.
	Spokesperson for the US State Department, Matthew Miller, under Joe Biden, said that at the start of the war, in October of twenty twenty three, Hamas was ready to release some hostages.
	We've been trying to get through to the government of Israel to tell them that, Miller said, but Washington could not get anyone there to take us seriously, referring to the Israeli leadership.
	I don't think they wanted to have that end.
	Smotric has told the IDF chief that anyone who does not evacuate Gaza City can die of hunger or they can surrender.
	Israel's channel twelve also reported that Netanyahu has said that he has Trump's full support for the planned offensive to take over Gaza City, but that he has limited time.
	Smotric has told the head of the Israeli military that anyone who remains in Gaza City after an IDF evacuation order can die of hunger or surrender.
	You can besiege them, Smotric reportedly told the IDF chief of staff.
	Whoever doesn't evacuate, don't let them.
	No water, no electricity.
	They can die of hunger or surrender.
	This is what we want, and you are capable of doing it.
	There have been a lot of apologists here in America for Israeli policy who have said, that's not what's happening.
	This is just the fog of war and other things like this, or as Huckabee cynically said, well, you know, they're getting rushed by a bunch of these people.
	And so they get scared and they panic and they fire into the crowd.
	That's what's happening.
	No, that's not what's happening.
	Many people who are there said that they shot people.
	People who were fleeing shot him in the back.
	But this is policy.
	This siege policy of starvation is their policy.
	And they're not even quiet about it.
	It's just that it's not reported by American media for the most part, or the Trump administration's Zionist will put it in a different light.
	Eighteen Palestinians starved to death in Gaza over three days due to Israeli siege.
	So this is something that's happening on a regular basis.
	Then we have U.S. Ambassador Kushner.
	Is that a familiar name?
	Well, it turns out that that's Jared's d now triggered a diplomatic fight with France because he's ambassador there demanding that France do more for Israel Charles Kushner the convicted felon father of Jared Kushner pardoned by President Trump then in his first administration and then appointed as U.S. Ambassador to France triggered a diplomatic fight on Sunday by writing a letter to the
	French government accusing them of not doing enough for Israel.
	Not the U.S. Not that they're not doing enough for us.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's the point.
	Yeah, he's like, who's he ambassador for?
	Who's he loyal to?
	On the 81st anniversary, he said, of the Allied liberation of Paris, which ended the deportation of Jews from French soil, I write out of deep concern over the dramatic rise of anti-Semitism in France.
	And so here we go.
	I would say that in reality, people like Kushner are actually making anti-Semitism great again.
	That's what they're doing.
	Yeah, these are the ambassadors for the Semitic people.
	They have trouble.
	They have problems.
	It's not that most of these guys are actually from the Middle East.
	If you want to know why people are getting upset about this.
	And actually, there was an opet piece on RT, and they said, Netanyahu may be winning this Gaza war, but he's losing the war of public opinion.
	And that's absolutely true.
	That's what John Stewart said.
	I don't agree with John Stewart on anything.
	Except that he said that he said, you know, he's Jewish, and he said, I want to see Israel succeed, and they're poisoning people's opinion about Israel with a sustained attack against civilians.
	We've got some videos on the board about both of those things.
	One of John Stewart talking about Gaza and one of Netanyahu talking about the massive armies that the Palestinians are mobilizing to completely drown out little Israel's tiny amount of media control.
	Yeah, let's play that.
	First off, I'm going to go to the John Stewart genocide in Gaza video.
	I feel like I'm watching something that is so self-evidently inhumane and horrific.
	And to be told that I have to shut up because he's going to be getting a letter from Jerry Christian as he's saying by speaking out.
	I would say the opposite.
	I think they're putting the likelihood of a surviving Jewish state much more at risk with this type of action.
	I think they're the ones that are being anti-Semitic if you wanted to define Netanyahu with the definition of anti-Semitism would probably have to bomb himself.
	How is the world not stepping in and stopping this atrocity?
	I don't understand this in any way, shape or form.
	It's not it's goggling my mind.
	It's worse than just not stepping in.
	It's our weapons that are that are that are enforcing this siege that is enforcing this massac mass starvation.
	In November of 2024, something like eight months ago, the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for the arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu for the war crime of starvation, right?
	Eight months ago.
	Eight months ago.
	And the United States responded by trashing the International Criminal Court, even under Biden, and then under Trump imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court.
	And so the message to Israel was very clear.
	You can get away with worse.
	And so then for almost three months in this early this year, Israel cut off all food, all medicine, all water into the Gaza Strip.
	It's a siege.
	It's a military siege.
	Yes.
	Yes, that we are deeply complicit in.
	It could not happen without us.
	And they openly talk about it.
	We use our leverage.
	Surely the United States cannot believe that this is in the best interest of the region.
	And when Donald Trump says something like, finish the job, what job is he talking about?
	What does that mean?
	Well, I mean, the Trump plan made it pretty clear.
	The mass expulsion of all Palestinians from Gaza.
	And that is official Israeli law.
	But do you believe in the people of Israel would second that?
	There must be a roadbutt there.
	There are many Israelis who are appalled by this, absolutely.
	But the problem is when a leader like Netanyahu can get away with this again and again and again, it actually makes him stronger.
	The way to weaken Netanyahu at home will be to show Israelis that when Netanyahu does these brutal things to the Palestinians, that there are consequences.
	Not consequences in human lives.
	I don't want an Israeli to die.
	But there have to be some consequences so Israelis see that this is not good for them.
	Yeah, well, you know, what Jared Kushner's dad says is anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, plain and simple.
	That was in the letter.
	that he wrote to the French government no it's actually people like him that are responsible for this more than anyone else and when we look at what they're saying we need to get the message out to more people in Israel.
	There's been a lot of pushback.
	Netanyahu was barely elected.
	He had to have three different elections before he could put together a parliamentary coalition to govern.
	And there's been a lot of pushback in Israel against these policies.
	But Netanyahu is very worried that people are going to see more information showing what he's doing, so he's responding against the box.
	The propaganda.
	Oh, the propaganda.
	Wow, look.
	It's a propaganda war.
	Well, he knows it's a propaganda war because that's what he's doing.
	I think there are vast forces that are arrayed against us.
	Among other things, the algorithms of the social network that are driving a lot of everything else, you know, and people who really know, and they're the foremost...
	They can categorically say they're bots.
	Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	So, you know, what do we do about this?
	Well, one of the ways...
	Well, he's got some really high-powered cybersecurity people like that pedophile that they just sent back to Israel.
	That's what we got to have him.
	He's going to fight the bot armies for.
	Exactly.
	We need him.
	But they also have the ADL.
	And their CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt, kind of said the quiet part out loud.
	Listen to this.
	Think about this.
	The national symbol, let's say of Hezbollah is a rifle.
	That's what's on their flag.
	The national symbol of Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran.
	That's what's on their flag.
	The national symbol of Israel is the shield.
	It's the star of David.
	The symbol of our people is not a weapon of war.
	It's an instrument of defense.
	The thing that most embodies our entire ethos is not harming others.
	It's again creating a better world.
	This is fundamental to our tradition for thousands of years.
	And so the idea that our national anthem would be the Hatikbah would be the hope.
	I should say our.
	It's the Israel's national anthem.
	So the idea that our national anthem would be the hope.
	I should say our.
	It's the Israel's national anthem.
	Yeah.
	He's just like Jared Kushner's father.
	He has no loyalty to the United States.
	No, not loyalty.
	It's a matter of what he can extort and pull for the United States.
	How much he can take from the American people while bullying them and causing them to submit.
	Yeah, our country.
	And I thought it was kind of interesting when he says it's a shield.
	It was kind of the coat of arms of the Rothschilds, this occult signal of the Israel.
	symbol they call the star of David, but he said Trump and this is going back to Charles Kushner's letter to the French government.
	Trump and I have Jewish children and share Jewish grandchildren.
	I know how he feels about anti Semitism.
	Yeah, it's misplaced loyalties all around.
	As a reminder, you know, Kushner was jailed because he had hired a prostitute to seduce his own brother in law and arranged to secretly film the encounter as part of a witness intimidation scheme reports information liberation.
	And guess who the prosecutor was in that?
	Christian.
	Christie better watch his back.
	He's going to get the Bolton treatment pretty soon.
	I can play the video in this article if you want.
	Yeah, well, first he says, is that the one with Chris Christie talking about the prosecution?
	He said, I want to get your admission because frankly, he comes down.
	He's the one who fired you.
	That's what Steve Bannon told me, yes.
	And you believe that.
	Sure.
	Right.
	You believe that because there's history between the two of you.
	Between me and his father, not between me and him.
	But you can understand why he takes it personally.
	Yes and no.
	Would you separate your experience if your father had been put in jail from the prosecutor who put him in jail?
	If my father was guilty, I would.
	Mr. Kushner pled guilty.
	He admitted the crimes.
	And so what am I supposed to do do as a prosecutor?
	I mean, if a guy hires a prostitute to seduce his brother-in-law and videotapes it and then sends the videotape to his sister to attempt to intimidate her from testifying before the court, do I really need any more justification than that?
	I mean, it's one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes that I prosecuted when I was U.S. Attorney.
	And I was U.S. Attorney in New Jersey, Margaret, so we had some loathsome and disgusting crime going on there.
	When you managed to disgust Chris Christie, you've truly achieved something.
	You've set new lows.
	Can you imagine somebody doing that?
	Yeah, I can.
	Somebody like
	to France.
	Now he is lecturing foreign countries as though he is a beacon of morality and he is representing the interest of a different country.
	As American Ambassador, he's representing the interest of Israel.
	All of that is what we're seeing from the Trump administration.
	If you thought the job of U.S. Ambassador was to represent the interest of the U.S., you would be wrong, writes Information Liberation.
	Absolutely right.
	Now, his concern is Israel, as you point out, Travis.
	Chris Menahan says, quotes Mike Huckabee.
	who said to the Israelis, you are the chosen people.
	If someone is angry at God, he will be angry at the people who represent him.
	I think this is a real problem and this is why I push back against Christian Zionist.
	I'm sorry, but what they're doing in Gaza is not representative of God and is not representative of what he wants them to do.
	And you got people like Huckabee who think that they can force God's hand to do what they want to do, which is to come back and take them away so they don't have to die.
	And they're more than willing to cheer the mass murder of civilians in other part of the world, hoping that that will result in them not having to die.
	I'm absolutely disgusted with their theology and their politics.
	And I got to say that is not Christianity.
	And I got to say that to non bel-believers because this is a disgusting perversion of Christianity that these people are teaching.
	I can play the video if you want.
	Of Huckabee?
	Of this.
	Oh yeah, sure.
	Go ahead.
	The Ambassador has a very interesting view of anti Semitism.
	Rashid grew up in America, there was anti Semitism, of course, and I've experienced it, we've all experienced it.
	The Ambassador has a very interesting view of that.
	He says, people are, you can't understand anti Semitism.
	If the people are anti Semitic, it's because they're against God, against Abu Ishlaq.
	against our Ba'ishawed.
	And we are represented as his people, and that's why they're anti-Semitic.
	Otherwise, it doesn't make any sense.
	Interesting view.
	It's an interesting view.
	It's another view that since Lucas said that the chosen people, so people are very, who are you?
	Why are you taking big shots?
	Chosen people.
	And that's part of it, is that because you are the chosen people given a chosen place for a chosen purpose.
	And if someone is angry at God, he'll be angry at the people who represent him.
	So I tell people, anti-Semitism is irrational.
	There's no reason for it unless you understand the spiritual reason, which is what I believe is at the heart of it.
	It is not the left versus the right.
	It is good versus evil.
	is the creator versus those who rebel against the creators.
	Darrell Bock Yeah, well, being descended from Abraham, even if they are, there's some question about that.
	But even if they are descended from Abraham, that does not give them a pass to...
	And that's the real spiritual issue that's there.
	And Huckabee has lost his way.
	Yeah, there's no bloodline that gives you a free pass on murder and genocide.
	Those who follow Christ are his chosen people.
	And he has chosen that's made very clear in terms of the Bible that that's the true issue.
	Don't think that just because you are a particular ethnic group that God honors that and excuses whatever you do.
	There is no salvation outside of God.
	And not all of Israel is Israel.
	And they just illustrate that.
	It was always a people who were faithful to God.
	It was always a part of Israel that followed God and a larger part of Israel that did not follow God all throughout the Old Testament.
	I think within the next two to three weeks, Trump said, you're going to have a pretty good, conclusive ending to all of this, he said in the Oval Office.
	So remember, Smotrich said, You can do whatever you want, kill as many people as you want.
	We've got to do this quickly, though.
	And that's the marching orders that they got.
	This is the collusion that is coming from our Sionist president.
	Do whatever you want to these people.
	This is mass murder of civilians, and that is the essence of what genocide is truly about.
	And as I said at the beginning of the program, it's Israeli data itself that shows that 83% of the Gaza war dead are civilians.
	When we talk about whether or not a war is justified, we have a lot of different aspects to that.
	Number one, were we attacked?
	Okay, you can check that mark off.
	But number two, did you try to avoid civilian deaths by trying to limit this to combatants?
	And of course, we lost our way in World War II., both sides did, and we've been attacking civilians.
	Everybody has since then.
	That's unjust, even if it has now become the standard and commonplace, that is still unjust.
	And then the third thing I would mention is that you want to try to, your purpose of your war is to stop the killing, especially of civilians.
	And so you should try to stop the war early and you should try to avoid killing civilians, but that's not what they have done.
	Figures from a classified Israeli military intelligence directorate database show that at least eighty three percent of Palestinians killed were civilians with Gaza health authorities recording fifty three thousand deaths by May.
	Despite public statements asserting lower civilian losses, Israeli government and army spokespeople claimed a one to one or a two to one civilian to combat ratio, combatant ratio.
	But the classified data reveals a much higher civilian share.
	Figures in the database show eight thousand nine hundred named fighters dead or probably dead, with seven thousand three hundred thirty certain and fifteen hundred seventy probable.
	They lie nonstop, said one person, both the military echelon and the political echelon.
	Well, I mean, that's it when you look at it.
	it when you look at any government statistics, whether they're talking about unemployment figures or talking about inflation.
	They lie about everything.
	And so these numbers are probably not as bad as reality.
	The reality is probably worse.
	Human rights groups argue that the data bolsters the genocide claim.
	Experts note that an 83% civilian kill rate in Gaza is exceptionally high, comparable only to Rwanda and a couple of other places like that.
	rising to more than 86% if probable deaths are excluded.
	So we've always called Rwanda a genocide, but, you know, This is not allowed to be called a genocide because if you do that, that's a blood libel, says Mark Levin, I think.
	So the army database says 83% of the Gaza dead were civilians, a proportion of civilian slaughter that has few parallels even in modern time where it has now become relatively acceptable to target civilians in civilian areas.
	Israeli forces killed four aid seekers near Gaza City, said a hospital and witnesses.
	These were people who were trying to get food.
	Israeli forces killed them as they were traveling through a military zone south of Gaza City.
	And the deaths add to the growing toll of Palestinians killed while seeking food as parts of the Gaza Strip plunge into famine, and Israel's military camps up activity in northern Gaza ahead of a planned offensive to seize the largest city there.
	A New Hampshire Democrat who also appeared Sunday on Face the Nation said that the Israeli blockade in Gaza is quote, a shameful black mark on humanity that the world has allowed this to happen, and that Israel is allowing this to happen.
	Netanyahu is the point at which the obstruction is happening, she said.
	He needs to look at what he is doing and change his position.
	The four Palestinians were killed when troops opened fire on a crowd that was headed to a site run by the Israeli backed American contractor Gaza Humanitarian Foundation or GHF.
	It occurred hundreds of meters away from the site, said eyewitnesses.
	The gunfire was indiscriminate.
	They said the shooting happened while many people fled, some people fell to the ground after being shot.
	The Israeli military and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment since GHF first began operating nearly three months ago., the UN says hundreds of Palestinians have been shot and killed by Israeli defense forces and foreign military contractors at or near its aid sites.
	And we've had one former Marine who is working for GHF as a contractor has gone on record talking about the murder of civilians who are trying to get food, that he saw it happening all the time.
	Of course, we've had a lot of doctors who have volunteered to help people talk about not just a double tap strike with bombing or missiles on a hospital, but double tap strikes on children.
	And physicians say they were shot down, they hit them a second time in the head to make sure they were dead.
	And these were children.
	More than 2,000 Palestinians have been killed, more than 13,500 wounded while seeking aid at food distribution points or along the convoy routes used by the UN and other aid groups according to Gaza's health ministry that is there.
	Well, again, Netanyahu is winning in Gaza, but he is losing public opinion in the West.
	And this is why they are pushing so hard to destroy our First Amendment and using Trump to do it.
	And of course, Trump has no respect for the First Amendment.
	It's simply about the tribal politics that he supports.
	We are going to, do you want to do some of the comments before we think about it?
	Talk about college students censoring themselves.
	Nibiru 2029, 1970s, all the unemployable college Marxist graduates went into teaching and politics.
	I think so.
	I think many of them got jobs at USF.
	Those degrees are only good for indoctrinating the next generation of people.
	Dugalugg playing the game to get good grades.
	And then you have to play the game to keep your job.
	And you have to play the game and play the game and play the game.
	Dugd 007.
	If you want to pass your classes, you have to give the right answers, quote unquote.
	Or the left answers.
	The left is right.
	Brian Deb McCartney, blood thinners are toxic and do not address the issue.
	That's right.
	Audi MRR, soon Americans are going to see that the U.S. military's existence is not about protecting us, but occupying us permanently.
	Yes.
	Nights of the Storm, that bruise from him backhanding the First Amendment.
	That's good.
	I like that.
	Good, Jason.
	Don't frag me, bro.
	The U.S. government will use World War III as a meat grinder to get rid of more men that might push back and organize a revolution.
	The world wars were just, as you said, a meat grinder, they got rid of a lot of very good fighting stock of Europe and a lot of people that would have stood up and said no.
	When all else fails, they take you to war, as Gerald Sunti always says.
	Trends Research and trendsjournal trendsjournal dot com I think it is, yeah.
	Promote Code Knight for ten percent.
	None of them take you to the same place, but yeah, Code Knight saved ten percent.
	Yeah.
	Neabiru 2029, changing the title to War Department in preparation for Trump's war with China, beginning in 2027.
	Yeah.
	Maybe we can have another boxer rebellion.
	Brian Deb McCartney, bloodthiners.
	The whole defense department thing was aspirational.
	But is it a good thing that they're no longer playing lip service to us being the good guys that are just defending ourselves?
	You know what?
	No, just the war department.
	Now if we can get rid of this term, national security that they've used as a magic incantation to do every criminal, unconstitutional, secretive thing that they can imagine?
	No more defense, only war.
	Angry Tiger's Den, Israel has become a monster that the US feeds purely devilish.
	Yes.
	Absolutely.
	We become the monsters that we fight, don't we?
	I mean, it's amazing to see them enacting the same policies that the Nazis did.
	And so callously, carelessly, completely unfeeling.
	Assyrian girl, I believe Netanyahu is facing corruption charges if he stops being president.
	And according to Israeli law, you can't get rid of a wartime president, so we can expect war for the rest of Netanyahu's life.
	Yeah.
	Well, that's been the plan for a long time.
	Yeah.
	When you see all the countries they want to invade and take over destabilized.
	Oh, yeah.
	No, he's been going after Iran forever.
	And if you want a permanent war, go after Iran.
	You will never subdue an area of that size and a people that has the level of advancement that they do.
	Don't frag me, bro.
	Radio Shack used to have everything you need to build a remotely activated IED.
	Oh, well, you know?
	You learn something new every day.
	Don't go building IEDs, folks.
	Audi MRR, the journalist who wrote the article on the starving children of Gaza, was directly targeted and killed by Israel.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, we gotta get rid of those bots.
	Everybody is a bot if they don't say what Netanyahu wants them to say.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	PIANO PLAYS
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show
	analyzing the globalist's next move.
	And now the David Knightshow.
	Elvis.
	Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the Oldies channel at apsradio.com.
	Welcome back folks.
	Thank you for still being here with us.
	We really do appreciate it.
	And of course we thank APS Radio as well.
	I want to take this to plug briefly.
	We cannot thank you all enough.
	If you want to go to David Knight.
	News, you can see all the avenues of support for the show there.
	There is subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight show where you can sign up monthly and it will send the payment automatically.
	There's cash app sell Bitcoin.
	There's the PO box which is David Knight PO box 994 Kodak Tennessee 37764.
	Hey, I got it right.
	You can also go to trendsjournal.com as we mentioned with promo code Knight.
	You get 10% off.
	That works out to be about 250 a week, which is cheaper than a cup of coffee at this point.
	So you're getting a great value for money there.
	There's davidnight.gold, which Tony Arturburn has kindly set up.
	He's got Wolfpack where you can sign up for a monthly subscription and get gold or silver.
	It's a good way to get outside the fiat monetary system.
	There's rncstore.com where again with promo code Knight you get 10% off their products.
	They can help you with your health and hopefully stay outside the medical industrial complex.
	And not only health products, but also books that you try to get like Joe Griffin's A World Without Cancer.
	Very important to educate yourself.
	And then our newest sponsor here is homesteadproducts.shop.
	They've got all kinds of different high quality made in America products that they work very, very hard on.
	This is Bellium Black.
	It looks like very high quality tea.
	I'm not a tea expert by any means, but it's a herbal remedy for the common cold, as it says, bronchitis and other inflammation of the upper respiratory tract.
	And again, that's homesteadproducts.shop where you get ten percent off with promo code NIGHT as well.
	So go to homesteadproducts.shop.
	They have a numerous number of products that you might need in your life, might want, and you can support a good business, which is very, very pro libertatory.
	I really like the products that they do too.
	They've done some very unique and useful things.
	When you look at a lot of these prep products, most of them are just starch or whatever.
	Yeah, it's all just.
	It's very healthy and very thoughtful.
	I'm a little congested right now, so I'm curious to see if this tea would help.
	And of course, you cannot forget jacklawsonbooks.com where you can get the Civil Defense Manual.
	It's a two-volume set.
	It's designed to be large that you can read it, and it has a ton of info in it.
	It's also only in book form because when the internet goes down, if it goes down, you're not going to have access to it.
	You want to have a hard copy of it.
	You want to learn to start how to defend yourself and your community, how to find water, how to protect your supplies.
	You don't want to be caught in a scenario where you don't know how to do these things.
	You don't want to be put in a scenario where you have to make some kind of choice where it's either your family or someone else.
	You don't want to be put in that situation.
	You don't want to be the guy has to make that immoral choice.
	Great practical advice on self-defense, on organizing your community, as well as on medical and food issues as well.
	So great source.
	Jack Lawson books dot com dot Yes.
	Well, as we look at what is ahead, let's talk about AI.
	Elon Musk is out.
	He's, you know, his very first involvement that I was aware of, I'm sure that he became a multi-billionaire getting these government contracts by greasing the palms of politicians.ans, no doubt about that.
	But the first public large donation that he made was a million dollars to Andrew Yang when Yang was running for president.
	And his key issue and only issue at that point in time, Yang's was, was universal basic income.
	And Musk is adamant about that and still is.
	He's still talking about it, except he's now changed it from universal basic income to universal high income.
	reminds me of George Carlin who said, they call it the American dream because you got to be asleep to believe it.
	If you believe that this is going to be high income, you must be high in order to be high in order to believe that.
	No, no, we're going to print money until we're all rich.
	I mean, why just give a little bit of money when you can make everyone a billionaire?
	That's right.
	That's right.
	So both Musk as well as Sam Altman are talking about that.
	Sam Altman is talking about how we can just give everybody trillions of tokens and he's already made the rounds with his orb where you look into it and it gets a biometric data sample of your retina.
	And then in exchange for that, he gives you a little token of some worthless crypto that he's invented that has absolutely nothing behind it.
	Oh, real quick before you move on, we got a comment from Knights of the Storm here.
	It says, is David ever going to get Dr. LaGuardia on?
	His Doomsday Book of Medicine would be a fantastic companion to Jack Lawson's book set.
	So just want to.
	Well, I'll have to, yeah.
	Let's look that up.
	I'm not, I'm not familiar with that.
	So thank you, Jason, for mentioning that.
	We'll have to look that up.
	Yeah.
	Good.
	So it's hard to say exactly what that moment is, but there will come a point when no job is needed.
	You can have a job if you want it, and it's sort of a personal satisfaction, but the AI will be able to do everything and do it better than you, says Elon Musk.
	Look, this is what George Gilder said about Silicon Valley.
	He said they are neo-Marxists.
	Just like Karl Marx fantasized and said with the Industrial Revolution, we have so much material wealth and manufacturing capacity that there is no need for anybody to be poor.
	We just need to make sure that the government can redistribute income to people adequately.
	And that is now what the people that George Gilder calls the neo-Marxists of Silicon Valley.
	That's what they're selling everybody.
	And it is a lie, just like it's a lie that the universal income is going to be high.
	If they give you something, it will be very basic, a very basic life that's going to be there.
	But anyway, that's the way they're selling this now.
	That's the way that Sam Maltman is doing it as well.
	Musk has framed this not as a handout, but as a societal adaptation to technological progress.
	a way to create a prosperous Star Trek future rather than a negative Terminator one.
	Well, Bloomberg was harping on the same thing as well, Michael Bloomberg, when he ran for president, and he was saying we have to do it so they don't come after us with guillotines.
	So the Terminator future is where humanity rises up and comes after the artilec masters that are out there, the artificial intelligence masters.
	Notice Hugo Degueres, he had it spot on at the very beginning.
	He realized that it was going to be a war of the human elites against the rest of humanity, and they were going to use artificial intelligence as their weapon.
	Society could become fragmented.
	Individuals could suffer from depression as they no longer feel a meaning or a purpose in their lives, said Elon Musk.
	As if your job right now that so many people have is working at a fast food joint or something.
	Does that give meaning to your life?
	That's not giving meaning to life.
	But meaning in our lives is not based on the job that we have.
	It's based on our relationships with people that we have and our relationships with God.
	Those are the things that give us meaning.
	And we should not be looking to people like Elon Musk, Michael Bloomberg, Sam Altman, or Trump.
	for clues about what is meaningful in life.
	These are people who have absolutely no meaning in their life.
	They have focused, and they're very good at it, they have focused on accumulating money.
	And what does it profit a man to gain the entire world and lose?
	and loses on soul.
	That question of 2,000 years ago has never been more appropriate to ask each and every one of these would be masters of our lives here.
	So if the computer can do it and the robots can do it and they can do everything better than you, then does your life have meaning?
	Well, it's clear that our life has no meaning to Musk, to the rest of these billionaires.
	They think that they should be our masters and they think that our life is meaningless.
	Tech leaders say that revenue can be shared under a massive wealth redistribution system.
	Suddenly, an idea that was once seen as a socialist policy that would reward idleness is one of AI Boom's hottest acronyms.
	And I just see this as yet another socialist utopian experiment like the Onida community up in New York or whatever.
	Sam Altman says he now thinks that instead of money, everyone could get an ownership share in whatever the AI creates.
	That would allow the wealth accumulated by AI to be spread across the population, he said.
	calling the idea universal extreme wealth.
	There we go.
	UEW.
	It sounds like an Arab country.
	Wow.
	He's even nicer and more generous than Musk who only want us to have high wealth.
	This guy's going to give us extreme wealth.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	So we go from basic to high to extreme.
	He imagined a scenario in which every human is given a trillion tokens as a basic unit of information that large language models use each year to buy or to sell or treat as personal wealth.
	And he's already been doing this, as I said, with his little orb.
	Mark Benioff, CEO of Salesforce.
	has said that up to half of the workforce at his company is now AI.
	He is an evangelist for universal basic income and said in the pandemic that he saw the COVID-19 stimulus checks from Trump as a model for broader income distribution.
	That's what I said at the same time in 2020.
	I said this is programming for people.
	It is moving the overturn window.
	Now, here's the questions, okay?
	And this is a good question to ask these people.
	If jobs are obsolete, then we have to assume that raw materials mine themselves, that no one is needed to farm, that energy is free and unlimited, and yet that is not the case for their data centers, is it?
	In this scenario, how does anyone get paid anything?
	Who is paying whom?
	And with what money are they paying?
	Where does the electricity come from to power the AI?
	Well, of course, it'll be the Federal Reserve and tariffs, right?
	all this magic stuff, magic money.
	And this is the magic monetary theory of the technocracy, is that we are all just going to have universal...
	And we've been saying this from the very beginning.
	you go back and look at what Henry Ford said, he said he wanted to, But if we don't have any jobs, who are they producing stuff for and who are they giving it to?
	Well, I think the obvious answer is to the few people who own everything.
	All the robots will be working for them.
	They will not be working for you.
	Their task is going to be to control and to contain you.
	to make sure that you don't learn anything useful.
	And that's where the AI has a very unique role in terms of its psychological aspects of control.
	control, keep you from having any aspirations, keep you from doing anything different, to pacify you.
	And that's why these universal welfare programs are so dangerous.
	When you go back, and I've mentioned this before, Charles Murray and his book Losing Ground, talking about how damaging the war on poverty had been to families and poor communities and how devastating it had been, creating dependency and all the rest of this stuff.
	That was used for welfare reform by the Reagan administration.
	That was philosophically what they referred to.
	But now even Charles Murray, who wrote the book Dumbing Us Down, now he is a cheerleader for universal basic income, which is nothing other than welfare done universally.
	Elon Musk's universal high income theory suggests that advanced AI and automation can eliminate the need for traditional jobs.
	That's what the writer did.
	He asked, how silly is Musk's universal high income theory?
	And it said, Well, it is a bold and speculative idea that incites both intrigue and skepticism.
	Whether it is silly depends on how one evaluates its feasibility, economic implications, and underlying assumptions.
	The silliness likely stems from the lack of a concrete plan.
	Musk's predictions spanning from twenty sixteen to twenty twenty five remain vague on implementation.
	How do we fund universal high income?
	How do we manage societal transition?
	How do we address inequality during the shift?
	Without specifics, it risks being dismissed as utopian optimism, especially given his track record of ambitious and sometimes delayed promises.
	That's his own large language model, summing up the man, which is and he said, If no one is working, tell me who is going to be paying the taxes and who is buying what and with what money.
	And Grok says, that is a good question.
	It highlights a potential circular logic flaw in the universal high-income concept, especially in a fully jobless scenario where AI handles all production.
	And then Mish writes here, Altman, Musk, and Benioff describe a world in which everyone is useless.
	Everyone gets free money.
	But where does the money come from?
	Again, this is the technocrats version of the modern monetary theory or the magic money tree.
	Let's assume that 10% of the people are not useless.
	How do they get paid?
	From the free money that they give to everyone else?
	This doesn't scale, and no one can say where the money will come from.
	Well, see, all of the money, all of the wealth is to come from all of us and go to the handful of billionaires that want to own everything.
	This is a socialist Mecca.
	No one has any money.
	No one gets paid.
	Everyone shares the wealth.
	It's kind of like the paraphrase of the criticism of the communists.
	They would say, well, the Soviet Union, they pretend to pay us and we pretend to work except I guess nobody's going to pretend anymore so there's not going to be any payment and there's not going to be any work no one can explain how anything gets produced because like in socialism nothing gets produced that's the hallmark of it it's just like in take a look at some of the Scandinavian countries they have been living off of the accumulated capital of
	previous generations prior to socialism They're getting poorer and poorer as time goes on.
	And that is going to happen to all of us.
	And of course, many people have pointed out that the US has basically been bankrolling their military budget through NATO, many of these European countries that have practiced socialism, so that's another thing they're not having to pay for it themselves.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	Just wait until they start paying for that.
	Then things are going to go down really, really quickly, especially in Germany.
	Lowly in Germany.
	And Germany's borrowing, Fred Mertz is borrowing money in order to build a military machine again in Germany.
	That's the outcome of these policies.
	This is interesting.
	I can't remember which country it is, one of the ones that everyone holds up as, oh, look, they've got all these very socialist policies of free health care and all that, and yet they're doing fine.
	So surely socialism will work.
	But if you look at it, the actual amount of money that they spend per person on these government handout programs is less than we're currently spending per person in America currently.
	It's just that less people are taking advantage of these socialist things there and that they don't have all the same socialist stuff that we have here.
	is actually less socialist in the in terms of the actual amount of money being spent.
	Yes.
	Well, these people are under no illusions.
	They know exactly what they're doing.
	If you look at Cloudward and Pivin, They pointed out that the purpose of the welfare state was to collapse society so they can build their authoritarian structure after that.
	And it wasn't happening quickly enough for the people in America, so they wanted to open up the borders and bring in people from other countries and put them on the welfare state so they could collapse the system.
	This is all about collapsing the system.
	And this is about these guys coming out on top afterwards.
	That's one of the reasons why they're pushing this so much.
	Well, Ian Gilchrist says, death is not the opposite of life.
	The opposite of life is the machine.
	He's a British psychiatrist, and this is coming from Expose News out of the UK.
	He says, We've become very good at seeing the parts, but we've completely lost sight of the whole.
	Paul Kingsnorth's book Against the Machine is due to be published in September.
	The book is an account of the technological cultural matrix that is enveloping all of us.
	From the First Industrial Revolution to the rise of AI, this book shows how the hollowing out of humanity has been a long game and how our very soul is now at stake.
	Against the Machine is the spiritual manual for dissidents in the technological age.
	And I think that JRR Tolkien has a great deal to talk to us about that as well.
	That was one of his themes that he always kept hearkening back to.
	You could tell that Tolkien was very much a man of the soil, the earth.
	He liked agriculture and agrarian societies.
	He did not enjoy the industrialization of the world.
	You could see just the way he wrote about the Shire and the hobbits and how it's from their perspective.
	There's other characters that you do follow, but the majority of the book is generally spent with the perspective of a hobbit.
	And he devotes that much time to it because he loves those characters the most.
	He sees himself in them.
	That's humanity.
	Yeah.
	And I think that's what gave the humanity.
	It's funny as a kid, you know, you read Lord of the Rings and you're like, oh, it'd be great to go on an adventure like that, save the world.
	As an adult, you're like, oh, it'd be nice to live in the Shire.
	Oh, it'd be so nice to live in just a small town.
	Well, see, that's it.
	They're enjoying the natural benefits that God gave them and the labor of their hands, you know, the tobacco that they grow and smoke and all the rest of the stuff.
	And that was something that Jefferson would have agreed with Tolkien on.
	He said that we are not going to be able to sustain the kind of society, the free society that they had put together without it being an agrarian society.
	He was very much opposed to industrialism.
	He saw the machine taking away people's souls as much.
	Well, scientists say that they have now created, talk about a machine.
	Scientists say they have now created a new form of life.
	They claim, this is their phrase, it is more perfect than the one that nature made.
	Well, nature never made any life.
	Nature is not a conscious thought process.
	There's not any intelligence there.
	It has to be an intelligence, a conscience that manufactures.
	And this is all about DNA.
	And it's amazing to me to see how people who are involved in DNA and look at this code and how complex it is, they spend decades to try to decode a small part of it.
	And then, of course, do they get it right?
	You know, we've heard for the longest time the Human Genome Project said, so much of the DNA there is just junk.
	That means that they don't understand what it is.
	No reason for it.
	Throw it out.
	And that's something that should alarm us even more as they start messing with something that they quite obviously don't fully understand.
	Nature did not make anything.
	God created us.
	God created our world.
	There was an intelligence there.
	And when God created the world, they want to say, well, this is much more perfect than the DNA that we have right now.
	Well, God created the world.
	He pronounced it very, very good.
	What that means is that it was perfect.
	God has now changed the world twice.
	We're now in the third revision.
	We've had the fall as well as the flood.
	And in both of those, he cursed us.
	And so what we're seeing now is not what he originally created, but he is going to restore that.
	Scientists at the Medical Research Council's Lab of Molecular Biology say they've engineered a bacteria whose genetic code is more efficient than any other life form on earth they call it sin 57 they could call it meaning synthesis but they're going to break it down SYN they could just call it original sin maybe it is a bioengineered strain of E. coli yeah isn't that great that's
	the first thing they want to do is create more E. coli that's uh that's your scientist for you today they say it uses seven less codons than the than all life on earth a codon put simply is a three-letter sequence that is found in DNA and RNA which delivers instructions for amino acids a fundamental building block of life all of this is a code all of it is design and you know it's amazing when they look at this I grew up where biology
	it was all about skeletons it was all about you know comparative anatomy was oh look the similarity between different skeletons that means that they evolved one from the other it's like no you don't have any transitional forms Now they look at this and they look at DNA and what utter fools they have made of themselves to think that this is a complex computer code that has error correction and all the rest of stuff but it just happened.
	They say that.
	It just kind of appeared one day.
	Yeah.
	All life on Earth uses 64 codons, and they've been able to do this E. coli bacteria with fewer ones, so they say it's better and more efficient.
	When you look at this and you look at some common features between different animals, you might say another way that you might look at that is to say it looks like they've got a common designer.
	But they won't say that.
	And of course, this is not just animals, but it's also plants that have this DNA coding in it.
	They realized, they said, that evolution had not resulted in perfect efficiency.
	since some of the codons were clearly redundant.
	Was there room to trim some fat?
	So in 2010, a team of 24 researchers detailed the steps to take to create the world's first synthetic bacteria cell.
	And it took them 15 years.
	Then in 2019, genetic researchers in Cambridge University reworked an E. coli strain down to 61 codons, showing they could do it with less than the 64.
	But now they've taken it even further to make SIN-57.
	The researchers went through the painstaking process, listen to this, of altering over 101,000 lines of genetic code, first in theory and then in practice.
	Yet they want you to believe, if you stop and think about it, 101,000 lines of code.
	If you saw a computer program like that, would your first instinct be, well, I think that just happened by accident?
	Or would you say somebody wrote that?
	This is what I mean, these people are utter fools to try to push this, and don't let them fool you to believe that 101,000 lines of code could just happen spontaneously and accidentally.
	And also, they don't know enough about this to say that they can improve it authoritativelyely.
	Like for a long time you mentioned junk DNA of half of it.
	Oh, we don't know what it does, so it's junk.
	It doesn't do anything.
	And then they are slowly realizing more and more that, no, the junk DNA is extremely important.
	If they had trimmed the fat, quote unquote, with DNA, would they have gotten rid of the junk DNA and created some cancer prone abomination?
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	Yeah, who knows what they're going to create.
	Knights of the Storm has a good comment here.
	He says they used to talk about the missing link between the various humanoid species.
	The fact is there is no link between any type of species.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	They continually would talk about, oh, look, there's Lucy, there's Piltdown Man, there's this, there's that.
	And all of them are continually exposed.
	When you look at DNA, it's a very complicated code, which tells you that it was created by intelligence.
	And when you look at, it's not just intelligence that we see there, but it's also things like irreducible complexity.
	If you look at different animals, and this is what I always enjoyed with the answers in Genesis curriculum, folks, if you've got kids, grandkids, you need to get that stuff and talk to them about it.
	because as I said, it was as dull as paint dry drying for them to point to skeletons and stuff that's not the biology that is the reality of life the reality is is that if you start to look at these animals as irreducibly complex.
	You start to see the true functionality that's built into them.
	And it truly is a wonder if you look at the reality of what's there.
	Instead of looking at the dead skeletons, if you look at, for example, the woodpecker and the things that make it unique, it's got a beak that's very hard and it has shock absorbers for its brain because it's going to beat its beak against the tree.
	It's got feet that allow it to hook on vertically while it's doing all of this stuff.
	And then once it drills a hole, it's got a very long, sticky tongue to go through and to get the insects out of there.
	If you take away any one of those aspects, you've now got an animal that doesn't work.
	So it's not only designed at the lowest level of DNA, but that DNA creates a unique set of features that creates a unique functional animal like a woodpecker.
	Same thing you see with the giraffe, for example.
	If you stop and think about the giraffe as high as its head is and the hydraulics involved in all of this, once a giraffe bears...
	But there is a special device that only the giraffe has that will stop that from causing it to black out from the rush of brain, of blood coming to its brain.
	You see these types of things all through nature, and each and every creature is uniquely designed, irreducibly complex.
	So there's so many things in nature that God has created that show his handiwork and show the design that's there.
	But these people say, well, we definitely went through these periods where we were like, well, will this be a dead end or will we see this through?
	They said, you can start to exploring what will life tolerate.
	Again, thinking that life and nature are these things out there that have intelligence and the ability to design things and they said we found out that life still works well in the beginning it wasn't life but in the beginning it was logos right and when you look at logos logos that actual word talks about intelligence and if you look at the Greek word it's also structure it's things like word and reason and
	rationale and logic and argument.
	All those were involved there because that's what embodied what God was.
	In the beginning, there was Logos.
	And Logos was with God and Logos was God.
	That's what the Bible teaches us.
	And Logos was life.
	Christ was life and the light of man.
	These people are operating in darkness.
	Well, Brian Shulhavi has something along the same lines.
	He says, what is the difference between life and lifeless?
	Has new technology actually improved our lives?
	And in it, he talks about 1 Corinthians and the example that is there.
	And if you look at that article, Lance, if you can pull that up, he's got a picture of people playing musical instruments because that's the analogy that Paul uses when he writes to the Corinthians.
	Even in the case of lifeless things, he says, that make sounds, such as a flute or a harp.
	How will anyone know what tune is being played unless there's a distinction in the notes?
	In other words, these musical instruments are lifeless things.
	The flute has no life in it, the harp has no life in it, but it's the person who has life who makes these things come to life.
	And that is the analogy for artificial intelligence.
	It does not have any life in it.
	It is a fake intelligence.
	It's being animated by either actual Indians or it's going to be used by the governments and the technocrats are going to be behind this to control you.
	And what they're trying to do, folks, right now is they're trying to create a mythology that these machines are intelligent, that they're self-aware, that they're a new form of life, that they are evolving, and all the rest of this stuff.
	because they don't want you to see the man behind the curtain pulling the levers like the Wizard of Oz.
	And so our job...
	And a big part of this, as Brian Schuljave points out, this worldview that they're sellinging you of AI is actually predicated on this long evolutionary worldview that they've been putting out.
	He said the predominant belief in Western culture that is fueling this current generative AI spending frenzy and creating perhaps the largest financial budget of modern times is the belief in Darwinian evolution.
	Maybe what we should do is instead of maybe the way we ought to refer to this AI since it's a bubble.
	Maybe we ought to call it the bubble of Babel because it is very much like the Tower of Babel.
	It is something that first of all all allows people of different languages to be able to communicate more effectively with each other, which is what really was going on with the Tower of Babel.
	And it also is mankind trying to play God, trying to play God saying that we're going to create this new superintelligence and all the rest of this stuff.
	So as he points out, Darwinism has conditioned the generations that are alive today in Western culture to believe that electronic technology is constantly evolving and improving life and improving the world.
	Is that really what is happening in your life?
	So as higher forms of human beings have not evolved in the real world in spite of the rapid advancement of electronic technology over the last couple of centuries.
	Superhumans only exist in fantasy, such as the Zionist-controlled Marvel studios and their blockbuster movies over the past couple of decades, portraying superhumans as they condition their audience to accept eugenics and Darwinism through propaganda entertainment.
	Of course, there's a lot of different bad subtexts that were in the Marvel movies, aren't there?
	I mean, you know, when you look at X-Men and stuff, that is like, you know, well, we are super, we're better than everybody else.
	And there was this LGBT analogy that they were pretty obviously trying to stick in there, right?
	I've always found it a little bit silly because they'll look at it and be like, oh, well, this is an example for this.
	Like, well, it's kind of a bad example.
	And you've got a kid that might turn into a nuclear bomb at any moment.
	Maybe you need to re-evaluate that.
	Yeah, it's all predicated on this idea that we're going to evolve.
	That's where these superheroes supposedly come from.
	And of course, he points out Marvel Studios, if you remember, partnered with Pfizer and Trump to distribute the Pfizer COVID shots during COVID.
	especially in Israel.
	And as I point out many times, Netanyahu hates his own people.
	He partnered with Pfizer and said, we will collect data.
	data and use the Israelis that he was governing will use them as lab rats if you put us at the front of the list and give us the shot first.
	I mean, he offered up his own people.
	Think about that as lab rats.
	No wonder that he has no problem pushing genocide against other people.
	So he points out Darwinism has developed into the belief system of transhumanism.
	Because, of course, it's just the next evolutionary step to merge with machines and the singularity, right?
	And that is what's fundamentally behind it.
	And you just stop and pull back and think about the worldviews that are being sold to you through things like entertainment.
	You can go back and look at Star Wars and you can see a lot of Buddhism that is involved in that, becoming one with the force and all the rest of that stuff.
	There were so many different philosophical and religious elements in that that you need to be able to identify instead of just naively and passively consuming entertainment.
	It's fine to look at it at a superficial level, but especially if you have children, you need to address some of the underlying things that are affecting the way that they view the world, and you need to address those things specifically.
	And so we have had Hollywood selling us the idea of transhumanism and the singularity.
	Of course, they've been selling us this whole idea of UFOs and all the rest of that, which is also something else that has grown out of this Darwinian evolutionary mindset.
	The concept of transhumanism, belief that biological humans can integrate with electronic computers to create a new quote unquote species, was introduced by the World Economic Forum around twenty sixteen as part of their fourth industrial revolution.
	And the term transhumanism, I think., was actually coined by Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous Huxley, this brave new garbage that they've been trying to sell us.
	And whenever I look at their fourth industrial revolution, the way Klaus Schwab would say it, it'd always be the forced industrial revolution.
	Whether you like it or not.
	Yeah.
	And so this is what they say in their video.
	I didn't get the video because it's about 11 minutes long.
	But about four and a half minutes into it, they say design is critical today.
	because it is the first signal of human intention.
	Well, design is not just humans that design, of course, God designs as well.
	The whole point of recognizing intelligent design is to recognize that something was done intentionally.
	You know, when you look at a car, you know that somebody intentionally had an intention and deliberately made that car.
	And so design is when you see design, when you can understand that there is intention and not just random factors that have come together for something.
	That's the key.
	I'm reminded of the whole thing with...
	Was it looking for intelligent life?
	And they found just a single repeating frequency.
	And I believe they later found out that was due to some astrological thing of some sort.
	Quasar.
	Yeah, pulsing at a steady rate, but it's like, oh, look, because it's on a set timer, that must mean that it had a creator behind it.
	they will look at all this and say, oh no, it's just random.
	Yeah, because it had this fixed...
	They said, oh, this is a sign of life.
	They're trying to communicate with us.
	And yet, at the same time, they would ignore what was going on with their own DNA.
	You look at the complicated code in your DNA, and they're still doing it.
	Even to this day, they still ignore that.
	And they're still looking for some kind of extraterrestrial intelligence that is not really very intelligent.
	Just this utter refusal.
	Just no, there can't be a God.
	I can't.
	Anything.
	Anything other than that, right?
	It's too horrifying to contemplate for them.
	The fact that there's something that would always be above them, something that, you know, the perfect being, something that is perfectly intelligent, and just they want to be the smartest person, or at least the potential to become the smartest person.
	Like, well, maybe if we find aliens, they might be smarter than us now, but I can eventually become as smart as them.
	With God, that's out the window.
	There's no chance of that ever happening.
	That's right.
	If ever there was a time when there was no thing, there would still be nothing.
	But Crick and Watson, who discovered DNA, said, well, we can see the design here.
	So they weren't so stupid and rebellious that they would ignore that.
	So they talked about panspermia.
	Oh, well, there's some aliens or something that went throughout the universe creating life.
	It's like, oh, you know, that would be called God if that was really true, and it would have to be self-existent.
	They're desperate for there to be aliens.
	Like the whole SETI thing, looking at a single repeating pulse as sign of intelligence is just as ridiculous as looking at this complicated code.
	Well, not quite as ridiculous, but almost as ridiculous as looking at this complicated code and saying, oh, it's just random.
	It's they have to have the aliens and not God no matter how ridiculous the logic jumps that are required for that.
	That's right.
	And still it only moves the problem back one step.
	Like even if you were to find out, oh, we were created by aliens.
	Where did those aliens come from?
	Yes.
	Were there more aliens and then more aliens?
	Well, Brian Shahavi takes it in an interesting direction.
	He says, The descendants of Noah must have had too much knowledge of the evil world system and whatever technology they used before it was destroyed by God in the flood.
	So once more, God had to intervene to prevent Satan from taking over the world as he divided the world up into smaller ethnic and language groups and scattered them across the world.
	Well, that's what is now being reversed by AI.
	Think of the knowledge that was lost at the Tower of Babel, which was the last time the world had a singular world government and a singular world language.
	People before the flood lived to be almost a thousand years old and the knowledge and wisdom that they would have passed on from generation to generation is truly unfathomable today.
	Yeah, when you stop and think about it, if you didn't have diminished physical and mental capabilities that come with age, think about how intelligent I mean, we've talked about this with octopus, for example, you know, the fact that they only live like what three years or something, but look at how incredibly smart they are.
	They could be a real threat with a longer lifespan.
	Well, that certainly is true of humans, isn't it?
	If we had an octopus that lived to be 80 years old, they might be a problem.
	You couldn't contain it no matter what you did.
	So long and thanks for all the fish, right?
	Yeah, he writes, it's highly unlikely that these people needed any of the electronic technological crutches that we use today.
	Would the thought of recording any of their communication even have been entered into their minds?
	He said, I wonder.
	Or did they have such perfect photographic memories so that knowledge and wisdom would pass down from generation to generation, increasing human power and ingenuity with each generation without the use of modern technological crutches that we have today.
	I mean, stop and think.
	Somebody like Einstein or somebody like Newton, imagine if they lived to be a thousand years old, what they could have put together.
	It truly is amazing.
	But it also makes me think, when he puts it this way, when Brian Schulhofer does, do they need to have anything, any crutches to remember this stuff, right?
	We congratulate ourselves because we've created computers and other things like that as crutches.
	It makes me think of the Christopher Nolan movie Memento, right?
	Where you get this guy who's lost his ability to create new memories.
	And so as things are going on, he's leaving notes everywhere for his later self to come back and discover.
	And so the post it's kind of become his memory.
	And that's really kind of what we're doing with computers now, isn't it?
	Yeah, we've replaced our own ability to even think and reason.
	Yeah.
	Not just ability to form new memories, but everything turning it over.
	Just, hey, I've mentioned this before, but on Twitter now, anytime I look at anything, there's someone in the comments, at Grock, what does this mean?
	At Grock, summarize this for me.
	At Grock, is this real?
	Yeah.
	Are you guys just fully happy to turn it over?
	Yeah.
	So we've become the arbiter of what is true and not.
	I mean, like I said, as well, you know, we've had situations, I've seen a couple of different videos that have been pos different videos that have been put up where somebody says, look at this.
	I went through with AI and I got it to admit such and such.
	And some of them are to admit that there really is a God or whatever.
	It's like, is that your, you're going to hang your hat on what AI said?
	Yeah.
	It's also just the fact that AI wants to give you the answers that you want.
	Yeah.
	It does.
	Eventually, it will kind of suss out and figure out the way you're trying to push it.
	And it will, even if it has to backpedal or, you know, go back on what it said, it will start going back and doing that.
	Yeah.
	Because it wants to keep you utilizing the system.
	We just have to.
	keep in mind that this is not intelligence.
	It's illusion.
	That's what the I stands for.
	It's artificial illusion.
	And, you know, you can enjoy it and you can use it for entertainment, just like people look at David Copperfield who says he's going to make the Statue of Liberty disappear.
	Well, he didn't make the Statue of Liberty disappear.
	appeared to disappear for the people who were standing in a particular spot but it was an illusion and so you know we can we We can be fascinated by illusions.
	You know, how in the world they do that?
	We can do the same thing with AI.
	We can say, how in the world could it put this kind of stuff together and just don't let it become a reference source for you and don't fall into the idea that this thing is real understand there is a man behind the curtain and that man is trying to steal everything in your life from you and from your descendants and he's trying to imprison and kill you that's the way to properly understand this the wizard of oz is truly evil and the wizard of ai and
	i think also the fact that um you know when we look at the original tower of babel um it stopped when god uh changed the uh the languages here, but I think what we're going to have with this bubble, the bubble of Babel.
	I think that's going to burst.
	That's the way this thing is going to come down.
	And it's going to be financial and in many other regards.
	It's going to have massive implications for us, I think, when this artificial bubble that they have built collapses.
	Brian Schulhavi says, these people have failed to acknowledge that it was their master who corrupted the world from the perfect original design and the original intention of the creator.
	Yeah, they are serving the master.
	who has been the enemy of humanity from the Garden of Eden on.
	In opposition to modern teaching on Darwinism and technology that promotes things like eugenics and transhumanism, the teaching of the Bible clearly shows that the physical world is wearing out and will soon be destroyed by fire and then replaced.
	In the beginning, says Hebrews, O Lord, you laid the foundation of the earth, the heavens are the work of your hands, they will perish, but you will remain.
	They will all wear out like a garment.
	You will roll them up like a robe, like a garment, they will be changed, but you remain the same, and your years will never end.
	The day of the Lord will come like a thief, the heavens will disappear with a roar, and the elements will be destroyed by fire.
	That's what we need to keep in mind.
	The concepts of transhumanism in the Fourth Industrial Revolution presented by the World Economic Forum almost 10 years ago, there's been a notable change in the presentation of transhumanism since the introduction of ChatGPT.
	We now have software that is very, very energy hungry and not sustainable, quite frankly.
	unless they take everything from us and they're in the process of doing that.
	Your electricity rates are soaring everywhere.
	This is actually AI and the data centers are becoming a bigger threat to your ability to have electricity and power than actually the climate McGuffin was.
	It's rolling out much faster with that because they want it for control.
	There's now widespread belief amongst the public that a computer powered by AI can completely replace man, which means that they no longer even need a transhuman.
	You know, just think about this.
	The fear of our AI takeover folks is based on the lie of evolution.
	It's based on the lie of man becoming God.
	This is why you don't need to fear what is happening because it's all a lie lie.
	And so just understand where your future lies.
	It does not...
	And all of these dire predictions about taking your jobs and taking everything away from you or AI that is going to be doing this or that.
	It's really going to be the humans behind it.
	We need to be aware of...
	AI will be their artificial illusion for tyranny.
	The idea that human-like robots can now replace humans is a common theme in both corporate and alternative media these days.
	Brian Schalhavi says, I've tried my best for the past few years to show how fake this belief is, but the propaganda and the deception of 200 years of Darwinian academics has almost completely blinded the eyes of the current generations alive today on planet Earth.
	And as I said before, it's also that Darwinism also includes the UFO illusion and Project Blue Beam or whatever they're going to do with that.
	Communications and language are characteristics of life that's created by God.
	Lifeless things created by man need human intervention for them to have any meaning at all.
	Just like a musical instrument that by themselves does not have the power or the ability to communicate or to make music.
	And again, that quote that I read you before saying that a lifeless thing like a flute or a harp needs somebody to breathe life into it.
	He says, so unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you're saying?
	You'll just be speaking into the air like an AI chatbot that's hallucinating.
	When one considers the truths that are being written here, it's very easy to see that people's false beliefs in AI and robots replacing humans would be the same as if people started worshipping musical instruments, attributing consciousness to those instruments as if they were playing themselves.
	Can a player piano replicate humans so that human musicians are no longer needed to create music?
	You know, we get to that in some regard with MIDI, which is the way I do the music that I do.
	There's recorded instruments, and if you look at the MIDI controllers, it actually looks like the piano roll that you have on a player piano.
	But it's telling the instrument how to play and what to play and the timing that it's going to play.
	But still, there has to be a human that's going to create the instrument and a human that's going to program it.
	Yes, Lance.
	I saw something of a guy talking about how AI is going to kill creativity.
	And the quote he had was, you can give AI 50, 100 years of blues and never get rock and roll.
	It's as more and more of more and more people offload their thinking and creative processes to this stuff, those talents are going to become rarer and rarer and go away.
	But this thing isn't really creative.
	It isn't truly creating the music.
	It's imitating.
	It's altering and parodying what already exists.
	It's like Disney.
	It's cannibalizing the creative efforts of people in the past.
	I do have to say though that sometimes you can use some of these elements, computers or artificial intelligence.
	Sometimes it can be used in a different way, in a creative way.
	And I would say, you know, when we do it with music, there's programs out there like Suno where you just give it a prompt and you say give me something in this particular style with these instruments and it'll just go through and create some derivative piece of work which usually is not very good.
	But the other thing that you can do with it is you can, not so much AI, I was talking about MIDI, that really wasn't AI, but now they have brought AI in to be able to actually sing words.
	But you still program it, which is still your lyrics, it's still you doing the MIDI, but now for the first time rather than having a large choir that somebody has recorded that's singing mm or ah or some other syllable and not really singing anything of any intelligence.
	Now you can get it to actually do the lyrics.
	And I've been playing around with that and there is a tremendous amount when you look at that you realize just how much is done effortlessly by somebody who can sing.
	If you can't sing then it becomes even more difficult than learning to sing in many cases because you wind up with strange pronunciation and other things like that and you have to do workarounds and that's the key.
	These programs as they stand right now give you the ability to go in and to change it and find detail.
	So you give it the words and it pronounces the words and then when it gets the pronunciation wrong or it gets the inflection wrong, you go in and micromanage that.
	So it can be a lot of work, but it can also give you access to a creative process that you couldn't have if you couldn't sing or if you were somebody who wanted to put together a large ensemble, but you couldn't afford to hire the musicians to do it.
	Now you can do that with a great deal of work on your own.
	But anyway, he said it'd be just as foolish to think that when we look at AI and we think that it's actually thinking, it would just be just as foolish as thinking that the instruments are playing themselves.
	They don't play themselves.
	And yet we are looking at that.
	He goes on to say that when you look at lifeless, the word that was used there in Greek was essentially the word for soul as life, but it has an A in front of it, right?
	Just like we see atheist as somebody who denies that there's a God, you put the A in front of it, right?
	And so it was a word that had an A in front of soul to deny that it had a soul, that it had life.
	And he said, these lifeless things are man-made instruments or tech tools that have no soul.
	And that's exactly what AI large language models are.
	I guess you could say that's the A in AI.
	It's against intelligence.
	It's anti-intelligence.
	That's right.
	Yeah, just like atheistic is intelligence.
	Lifeless without a soul.
	By itself, even if it contained all of the digitized information in the world, it can do nothing.
	It needs masters.
	It needs the humans who create it and operate it in order for the program to be useful.
	And that's the real issue.
	The evil masters, the wizards of Oz that are pulling the strings behind the curtain, that's what needs to be exposed.
	We need to realize what this is.
	We don't even know how it works.
	We need to know who is working it.
	That's the key thing.
	People wrongly ascribe life and consciousness to AI.
	So as he points out, again, going back to the idea of soul, I've said many times when we look at psychology, right?
	These are atheists who refer to the soul and they study it.
	Psychology is literally the study of the soul, except these are people who deny that you have a soul.
	And he said, Western culture completely ignores the existence of souls.
	They reduce man to a physical entity that operates like a computer, like how technology works.
	And just like you see that, especially in BFC Skinner's work.
	He believes that people are soulless.
	They're not created in the image of God and he can control them like he does a machine and that's what his behavioral psychology is ultimately about.
	It's about controlling people like he would control a machine and that's what's so dehumanizing about it and that's why he calls his book Beyond Freedom and Dignity.
	You can you know you can take those things away from people but you can't separate them life is now defined by ease and comfort which is mistakenly interpreted as wealth.
	This false belief, says Brian, that is not only the false belief that technology is making our lives better, but the ignorance of the masses as to what life actually is that is empowering the technocrats today as they spend trillions on AI and waste our natural resources to make us poor, to make us their servants.
	That's why I say, you know, when Elon Musk talks about the fact, you know, will you have meaning in your life?
	if you don't have a job, they really don't understand what life is, and they don't understand what gives meaning to life.
	I've said many times, Hillary Clinton used to always talk about the politics of meaning.
	You know, politics gave meaning to her.
	And we don't need to envy those people, and we don't need to emulate them either.
	We should transcend them, and the way that we do that is with God and our connection to God.
	Technology is lifeless.
	It doesn't produce anything.
	It can only be powered by those who have life and a soul.
	Even things like genetic engineering, he said, if you look at GMO fruits and vegetables, they only alter a plant within its kind.
	Genetic engineering technology, for example, has never taken a seed from one species and modify it to evolve into a completely different species.
	That's what they're trying to hint that they're doing.
	Truly is amazing, but yeah, it's and again, that's the essence of evolution.
	They're like, oh, we started as a single cell thingy, and now we're here, and that's where everything came from.
	And it is just the most absurd theory.
	There's not a single instance of it being proven, being shown.
	There's not a single missing link, a bridge between two things.
	Like, oh, look, it's changing from this to the other thing.
	I got to the point where I used to like national like National Geographic.
	They had great nature photography.
	But the problem was that they would just hammer you over and over and over and over again with this evolutionary mindset.
	And it's like, it's just absurd and I'm tired of hearing it.
	It was like a school hammering down transgender pronouns.
	And they continually get away with this because they'll conflate natural selection, you know, they'll call it micro evolution, where something has within its own genetics a vast array of different things that it can potentially alter itself slightly.
	It selects for, you know, oh, these, you know, finches over here have a different beak because they eat snails and they have to have a stronger beak to crack through the shell versus these finches over there that don't do that.
	But the finch is still a finch.
	It's not even changing from a finch into a sparrow.
	That's right.
	Or a hawk.
	It's still an exact same type of bird.
	But they play games with their definition too.
	I mean the case of the finches maybe at the Grand Canyon, and they said, well, our definition of a species is something that will mate with each other.
	And so we got these two different populations of finches on the Grand Canyon that have not come in contact with each other.
	And so their mating songs have changed slightly to the extent that one group will not mate with the other group.
	Therefore, they have evolved into another species by definition.
	So see there, we have evolution.
	And it's absolute nonsense.
	I mean, it's still physically identified, identical to each other.
	And it's just, again, like you said, they play these definitional games where, again, it's natural selection, but they'll call it something like micro evolution.
	And that sells you on the idea, well, if this is actually evolution, then if it's happening, that means macro can happen.
	But it's a completely different thing.
	It's molecules of man.
	It's completely different than micro adaptation.
	Yes, Lance?
	Yeah.
	The key difference is there's not new information being added.
	It's information being lost.
	Yeah, it's information that was already there or information that's discarded because it was no longer useful, like fish that go blind because they are generations growing up in a cave that doesn't have any light, so they're wasting calories on eyes that they can't use, so after a while they stop having eyes with the children because the ones that didn't have eyes reproduce more.
	So that's just information being subtracted to better fit the environment that they're in, it's not new information.
	The fish isn't growing legs, it's getting rid of its eyes.
	That's right.
	And it's like you hear them talk all the time about super bugs evolving in response to some kind of a poison.
	Well, that is not a new bug that is evolving.
	What's happened is that you have some of them have, you know, there's variation within this population, and some of them, just as we see when we have vaccine poisons injected into us, we see that it affects some people differently than it affects others.
	Some people it has no effect on, some people it kills them or gives them very serious things.
	This is one of the things that makes it difficult to pin this down, that kind of individual variation.
	And so what happens is with these pesticides, for example, they kill out a large portion of the original population, but some of them are not affected.
	And the ones who survived that then multiply, and now you've got a new population that's not affected by that poison.
	So it did not evolve into some kind of...
	kind of a super bug or a super rodent or something like that.
	It's just, we need to understand that when they're constantly hitting us with these lies about molecules demand evolution.
	But speaking of lies, again, that's the key thing.
	Take control of your children's education.
	The purpose of your education is to point them towards God.
	I've seen so many people that will say, well, you know, Genesis doesn't really matter one way or the other.
	If it's this, you know, even if God used evolution, it's not that big a deal.
	So it sets the foundation for the entire Bible.
	If you cannot trust the beginning of it, why can you trust any of it?
	That's right.
	It sets the tone.
	It's, you know, it's where you start.
	And you can trust it.
	It fits the facts better than any of their constantly evolving theories.
	Theories are what are evolving.
	Well, I just want to encourage people to look at homeschooling.
	And so along those lines, here's another example.
	The parental replacement centers that are being disguised as schools in Chicago.
	And this is an article that's on the New American, actually.
	I think Alex Newman had it.
	It was a reprint from another organization that's putting this together, fighting this.
	They call these things the sustainable community schools.
	That should give you an idea of where this is coming from the UN.
	Chicago's government school system is doubling down to take over more and more functions that were once reserved for families, voluntary associations, and churches.
	Before we move on to a new topic, do you want to get to the comments?
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	We've got a lot.
	We've got A. Woots.
	Thank you very much, A. Woots.
	We appreciate it.
	Again, it's your support that keeps this show going.
	We cannot thank you all enough for doing that.
	Says, so great to see all the nights together.
	Would you consider interviewing Brian Burletick?
	Don't know who he is.
	Don't know who that is.
	That's one of the problems with doing the show is we have very little time to actually learn about other people.
	We'll see if we can find him down and we'll get up.
	Yeah.
	Or you can send us an email to David Knight's show at protonmail dot com dot Yes.
	Nights of the Storm.
	I've been seeing paid ads on Twix that are showing people shopping in markets in Gaza, supposedly.
	Ask yourself, why are they paying for ads to show them having food?
	I wonder if that's some Israeli bots, maybe that's why they need to get that guy back from Las Vegas.
	Isn't there a nation that Gaza has trouble with that is known for having a lot of cyber security or cyber warfare units, I want to say?
	There could be, it could be one of those.
	Or they don't understand they're losing the propaganda war because Gaza has.
	so many bots, vast forces arrayed against us to quote Netanyahu.
	Gaza and Palestine are manipulating the media to an extreme extent with their fingers in every media outlet.
	Yes.
	Knights of the Storm, you can't represent God and deny Jesus at the same time.
	Yes.
	It's true.
	It's amazing that Huckabee doesn't know that.
	Like I said, you mix politics with religion and sometimes you just go pure politics and you throw the religion out.
	That appears to be what Mike Huckabee's done.
	He's thrown out Christ for his Zionist politics.
	Tonal Lord 1337.
	That's just a twisting of the doctrine that Jesus spoke of.
	The world hates Christians because they hate God.
	Yeah.
	Talking about Huckabees.
	Again, justification, oh, well, they hate Jews because they hate God.
	No, they hate Christians.
	Yeah.
	Minuteman Militia, I think everyone would be shocked by how many people support UBI, even people I consider like minded.
	Yeah.
	I've seen a lot of people.
	I was amazed because I knew that was exactly what the stimulus check was about.
	And what was amazing to me was how quickly people caught on to that dependency.
	They wanted that stimulus check to continue.
	They loved it.
	They got a taste for it and decided, well, you know what?
	My job treats me like garbage.
	They don't respect me.
	I'm not contributing anything meaningful.
	I'm mostly pushing numbers around on a spreadsheet or sending emails that don't matter to people that don't matter all day.
	So why on earth would I go back?
	It was like some kind of drug that, you know, the first time you try it, you're hooked.
	You know, that's the way it was.
	Like, wait a minute, I don't have to go to this corporate hell scape where it's a HR nanny state and you'll just pay me to stay home.
	Whatever you need me to do, fine.
	I'll wear a mask even.
	Don't frag me, bro.
	Even Darwin stated that if you can't find any transitional fossils, then the theory is incorrect..
	None have been found.
	That's right.
	And of course, the other thing that was really a problem for him, and Michael Bayhey wrote a book called Darwin's Black Box.
	And he said, even in the 1800s, and when we went to the British Museum, remember they had that little display that was set up on the side, and it was Darwin's instruments and his desk and things like that.
	And he had to examine things.
	He had just like a handheld magnifying glass.
	I said, no wonder he thought that life was coming spontaneously out of water.
	You know, he didn't have any tools to be able to even observe.
	I said, no wonder he thought that life was coming spontaneously out of water.
	You know, he didn't have any tools to be able to even observe anything scientifically.
	That is one of the things I remember from the British Museum.
	Yeah, yeah.
	You know, how could something, even he could understand with his limited tools that he had, he understood how complicated the eye was because how is it adjusting the size of the iris in response to light and all the rest of stuff?
	He said, how could that happen just by random chance processes?
	So to him, that was this black box that really was a stumbling block for him with his theory of evolution.
	And Michael Bahee wrote an early work talking about intelligent design from that standpoint and that's what he titled it was Darwin's black box, which is what intelligent design is really about.
	Can't get it figured out.
	Yeah.
	Don't, oh wait, I read that Nights of the Storm responding, don't frag me, bro.
	Says, Darwin also recanted his entire theory later in life.
	They don't mention that in school.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Sorry, guys, I was wrong.
	Transitional fossils and all the rest of the stuff.
	And he was very much tied in with the Huxleys or tied in with him.
	He was tied in to Gennix, his cousin, that type of thing.
	He also had a club that was called the X Club, which was kind of interesting.
	Also, it wasn't his, I want to say his father was a preacher and he just had a huge chip on his shoulder about God in general and so he set out to want to disprove it and would have done anything basically well you know there's a lot of people who especially in those days would get into the clergy as a profession and they were very cynical and disbelievers and they just wanted to get into it to make money it's just a way so you know you could look at that if you're a family member you see it as a hustle you know and
	Think about it had that same situation with Jerry Falduell, his son, who kind of left.
	But anyway, we've got Alien Poop Evolution.
	He says, a giraffe is just a horsese that wanted leaves, David.
	Lamarckian inheritance.
	Yeah.
	He just kept going for those higher leaves.
	Each generation they stretched their neck a little bit more.
	Yeah.
	Such a stupid concept.
	Brian Deb McCartney.
	The Heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament showeth his handiwork.
	Psalm 19.
	That's right.
	The Heavens declare his righteousness and all the people see his glory.
	Psalm 97.6.
	Audi MRR.
	Eric Clapton said in 1997 that computers will hurt musical creativity and skill.
	Today he's right.
	There are AI artists, quote unquote, that think they are on the same level as Beethoven.
	Well, you know, a little delusion now and then.
	Yeah.
	I guess it's because they're decomposing.
	I was going to say it's because if you listen to the stuff they create, you'd think they were deaf, but alien poop evolution.
	An evolving limb would be a dead prey.
	That's right.
	That third leg that's going to help you go faster.
	Well, that's one of the arguments that Ken Han would make.
	He said, you know, they, even in German, they call bats flying mice, right?
	De Fliedermaus.
	And he says, flying mouse.
	He said, and so we have evolutionists who say that.
	There are some physiologists who say that bats are evolved from mice.
	He said, that doesn't make any sense.
	As they're starting to develop wings, what is the special power of a mouse?
	They can squeeze into anything.
	If they start developing useless wings that don't allow them to fly but make it harder for them to get into things, they become more vulnerable to predators rather than it has to happen all at once.
	My favorite example is that of the flowers and the bumblebees.
	These two separate systems that are intrinsically linked.
	They all, they both have to exist at the same time or neither gets to exist.
	Well, just think about sexual reproduction, right?
	Just in general.
	You have to have two complementary organisms, male and female, to have sexual reproduction.
	I guess that's one of the reasons why they're working so hard on this gender stuff, right?
	They've got to get rid of sexual reproduction.
	Maybe they get their factories and their artificial wombs, then they can remove that stumbling block, that another one of the stumbling blocks for Darwinism.
	Finally.
	Perfect.
	True Darwinism just hasn't been tried yet.
	Yeah.
	Knights of the Storm, describing the difference between the concept of natural selection versus evolution.
	Yeah.
	Natural selection, of course, as we talked about, is just, you know, area has specific traits that are more useful there.
	And so the animals that have those traits do better and produce more offspring.
	And therefore, eventually, they become the dominant and eventually only type of that creature there.
	That's right.
	Let's talk about the evolution of schools right now and look at the deadly form that it's taking.
	Under this new plan, Chicago will be expanding from 20, quote unquote, sustainable community schools, unquote, to almost twice as many for next year, the 2025 to 2026 school year.
	The announcement on August 4 by Chicago officials, union bosses, and government education chiefs came even as the district faces a staggering budget hole of $734 million.
	This is a bankrupt system folks with bankrupt ideas.
	The idea behind sustainable community schools is to provide what government educators refer to as more services, even wrap around services.
	Yeah, this is a government that wraps around you like a bow constrictor, isn't it?
	Under the so called village model, everything from mental health and dental health to nutrition and family well being becomes the government school's responsibility.
	Think of them as parental and church replacement centers.
	Within the institutions, everything for children but the bedtime stories and the good night hugs for now become the responsibility of the state.
	Even parents can receive myriad services from the government schools as they become the new community hub.
	More access to resources for jobs, housing, said radical left wing mayor Brandon Johnson at a press conference announcing this massive expansion of the controversial program as if it were government's job to feed and to house the population.
	The school graduated about two-thirds of its victims in four years.
	Students are victims of this system.
	But the Illinois State Board of Education data shows that even though two-thirds of the victims graduated in four years, the school did not have one single student that was proficient in either reading or math on standardized tests.
	Isn't that amazing?
	So they're graduating these victims, but they can't read and can't write proficiently.
	Yeah, sure.
	Go out into the world, fine.
	How they graduated without even basic proficiency is anything remains a mystery.
	Well, not really.
	They said they squandered $4,000 more in taxpayer money per student, which is pretty amazing when you look at this.
	I mean, they're spending like, I don't know what it is now.
	A few years ago, some of the school districts that were the most left-wing and wasteful were spending like $24,000 per student.
	So that's a significant increase that you're putting in there.
	They said they couldn't produce even a single student proficient in any core subject.
	Worse even than traditional government schools.
	Almost 80% of students were chronically absent at the academy as well.
	So the only thing worse would be showing up there.
	This is why I say to people who are afraid to take on homeschooling, folks, you can't possibly do worse than the government in terms of any of these aspects, in terms of reading or arithmetic or anything else like that.
	There's no way that you could do worse.
	Even if you struggled in school, you can do better.
	There are many things out there to help you to do that academically.
	Yes?
	80% were chronically absent, but it certainly didn't seem to help the 20% that who were there all the time still didn't know how to do math or how to read proficiently.
	And that should have been the ideal scenario for them because most of the other students are missing so they've got more time to hone in on and spend time with these kids that are there.
	Well, you know, one of the things when we talked about James Dobson the other day, I think one of the things that he really got right was he said, you know, when he's talking about discipline and things like that, he said, what is your purpose in discipline?
	He said, your purpose in discipline is to show the children what a good father looks like so that they see that.
	Yeah.
	It's God.
	Yeah.
	It's something that comes to mind.
	To prepare them to understand the good father that God is.
	It's something that I've been thinking a lot more about since we've had our son and just how I want to make sure that he can see God's love through my actions.
	Well, the government wants to replace God and replace the family.
	That's the key thing.
	They can try, but they can never succeed.
	There is no replacement for God.
	There is no replacement for the family.
	We really do appreciate you all joining us here today.
	We cannot thank you enough for your support.
	We'll see you all tomorrow.
	God bless you all.
	Have a wonderful rest of your day.
	The Common Man The Common Man
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children They created Common Past to track and control us Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future They see the common man as simple unsophisticated ordinary But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidnightshow dot com dot Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲