All Episodes
July 31, 2025 - The David Knight Show
03:01:36
The David Knight Show - 7/31/2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it is Thursday, the 31st of July, Year of Our Lord, 2025.
And apparently, the FBI is allegedly holding on to the missing footage from outside Jeffrey Epstein's cell.
It looks like Donald Trump may be pardoning P. Diddy.
Will Ghelane Maxwell be next?
And Trump is looking at levying fines up to $1.5 million on Chinese-built ships for each port of call.
I'm sure this won't impact the American consumer.
Stay with us.
*thunder*
Welcome to the show today, folks.
Hope you're all having a good morning.
So we're going to start with the aftermath of the racially motivated beating that happened in Cincinnati.
First, North American House Hippo, thank you very much for the tip.
We do appreciate it.
Cannot thank you enough.
Says, Trump just held a press conference, ladies and gentlemen.
The fake news, I can announce to you that nobody named Jeffrey Epstein has ever existed.
Elon Musk just got back from the time travel portal at the Pentagon.
It's the greatest time portal ever.
Cost a hundred quintillion dollars.
It's all in the big, beautiful bill.
Read it.
It's there.
North foreign countries are going to pay for it with tariffs.
So Elon went back in time, killed Epstein's granddad, killed his grandma too.
Stuck some ketamine in them from behind.
It was the greatest surprise time travel killing ever.
Well, we're all very thankful to Elon Musk for taking care of that problem.
Finally, time travel.
And Canada.
Anyway, Elon brought me some Canadian McDonald's poutine.
It's the greatest poutine ever.
Fries, gravy, cheese curds.
Gonna sign an executive order making McDonald's here in America sell it.
Gonna have a tariff on it, of course, a 200% tariff, unless we can make a deal with Antarctica.
Anyway, Elon's here.
We're good friends.
You know, the best friends.
Yeah.
This is from WorldNet Daily by Joe Kovacs.
They begged for that beat down.
Top Cincinnati official allegedly grateful after black mob pummels whites.
So they weren't just asking for it, they were begging for it.
You can see in this article here, she's right.
Victoria Parks says they begged for that beatdown.
I'm grateful for the whole story.
If you scroll down, yeah, there it is.
Her comment.
These people, for some reason, are incapable of understanding that these are public comments, that there's going to be consequences for them.
That you can't say things like this as a public official when you are in charge of things and not have people get upset and demand some kind of action.
Urgent calls for the firing and arrest of a top Cincinnati councilwoman emerged Wednesday after she allegedly said she was grateful for the vicious pummeling of white citizens and that they begged to be attacked.
We see this mentality a lot nowadays.
A lot.
They begged for that beatdown.
I'm grateful for the whole story is attributed to Victoria Parks, President Pro Tem of Cincinnati City Council.
They begged for it.
A comment thread discussing Saturday's violence, which a mob is shown horrifically hammering numerous white people.
Cincinnati Councilwoman Victoria Parks needs to step down, so does the Cincinnati Police Chief.
They are both defending criminal behavior, urged one person on X. They get so woke and so scared of the melanin.
At what point has the media mischaracterized Oisa melanins never scared me, you know?
What am I?
Why would I be afraid of a good night's sleep?
Whoa.
It has just been revealed that Cincinnati Council member and President Pro Tempore, Victoria Parks, says she's grateful for the beat down by a black mob against white people at the Jazz Festival.
It's from Eric L. Daw on Twitter.
Other comments include, this should be an immediate termination condoning and supporting this kind of attack.
Yeah, I don't think you should be allowed to hold public office if you're going to condone this kind of violence against people.
So you sanction a beating because he did what?
Breathe?
Or you just know he deserved it?
And I'm sure the woman is equally guilty.
Well, you know, maybe his breathing was a slight against George Floyd.
You know, he couldn't breathe, so as someone who was breathing, Maybe that was an attack on that.
He says, I hope the victims sue this hag.
I hope they do too.
Wow, a member.
Well, actually, she's the head of the Cincinnati City Council's praising the black thugs for beating up white people in the Ohio City, claiming they begged for that beat town.
People are blown away, but this is a fairly common sort of sentiment.
We see this sort of thing continually.
Anytime there's a video of a white person being assaulted by a black person, there's this, well, what did they do?
Did they say something?
Did they deserve it?
Just there is this continual, they probably did something that makes it justified.
They must have done something that justifies it.
I mean, there's this continual propaganda from schools, from the media, everywhere you look, talking about how evil white people are and how black people can never be racist, no matter how racist they are against white people, it doesn't count.
So, naturally, when something like this happens, which, you know, as many people have pointed out, if the races were reversed, it would have been cause for massive rioting.
Yeah.
But they can look at that and see absolutely no problem with it because they are so propagandized.
Yeah, they even went so far as to change the definition of racism to be, you know, prejudice plus power.
It doesn't need, you don't need any institutional power to be racist.
It's about a personal belief that you yourself hold.
It doesn't matter if you're the president of the United States or just some guy.
It's still racism.
It's plus the whole prejudice plus power thing is ridiculous to imply that black people can never have power.
I mean, there is clearly a power in the permission of, you know, these people are permitted to do all this without any consequence.
Then it's also funny.
You'll see people say, well, it's prejudice plus power.
It's like, okay, well, what about South Africa where they're raping and murdering white people continually?
Oh, well, you know, that's actually good because they're colonizers.
Like, yes, but the white people, they're a minority and don't wield power.
It's like, oh, well, da-da-da-da.
And of course, it shifts and it dances.
And what it really comes down to is they hate white people.
That's what it comes down to.
They have been propagandized to hate white people, and they do.
Hamilton County prosecuting attorney Connie Pillich made a strong statement after watching video from the fight that has been seen by millions across multiple platforms.
In order to dissuade people from committing these types of offenses, I'm going to throw the book at them.
Then she, I think, lets one of them out on a $400 bail.
That's really throwing the book at them.
She didn't say what book.
Maybe it was a very small book.
Maybe it was a children's book.
I will throw the pamphlet.
Parks announced in January she will not be running for re-election.
This is a hate crime that has attempted murder written all over it, says at Stee War 1510.
Of course, the crowd is cheering it on.
The only surprising thing about the video is that they didn't immediately rob him after being assaulted.
And of course, I don't believe in hate crimes.
I don't believe hate crime is a useful addendum.
I think it's just another nonsense term they've put in there to allow them to exert more influence over your life.
A crime is a crime.
You don't need to label it some kind of hate crime for it to have an important meaning.
The fact that they haven't labeled it a hate crime shows that there is no such thing as a hate crime.
It's just whatever is politically expedient.
I mean, obviously, by any objective measure, this would be a hate crime that they've considered a hate crime.
It would meet their standard for a hate crime, yeah.
Yes, but because it doesn't fit their narrative, they can just ignore it.
And because it's all about the motive of the people at the moment, and you can never actually prove that, they can say that it wasn't a hate crime, and it wasn't.
Who cares?
Yeah, we actually have some video.
We'll play some of it.
Just be ready to duck the audio, because just based on what's happening, there's probably going to be a lot of language in it.
And I doubt there's going to be anything worth listening to said in this.
So be ready with that.
Ew!
Oh!
Yeah, we can get rid of this audio.
Whoa!
Yeah, nothing of value is being said there.
It's just, oh, oh, yeah.
Wow.
A guy was able to knock out a woman.
Isn't that something?
Isn't that crazy?
These people just filming it.
Absolutely useless.
Poor woman.
Look at her face there.
Look at that.
This is what happened afterwards.
This is what her face looked like after the assault.
This is, again, this is a consequence of the racial hatred that they have inculcated in people, especially black people towards white people over the years.
It's really funny.
In the late 90s, there was a sort of just this, oh, we're kind of post-racism here.
We're kind of done with it.
We've moved on.
Largely, it's forgotten.
No one's really focused on it too much.
People are kind of just people.
And then as time goes on, racism has made a comeback since then because it has been so largely focused on.
It has been continually harped upon to the point where it is come back, but it is completely and utterly justified in the reverse from what it was.
Black people are allowed to hate white people.
In fact, they should.
If you don't, you might be some kind of sellout.
Let's take a look at this.
See what this man has to say.
So, the incident that happened in Cincinnati, Ohio, I've been like watching comments and videos and stuff.
But my confusion is: why hasn't this been deemed a hate crime?
Why?
Why hasn't this been deemed a hate crime?
Jumping a woman, a man, socking a woman, and a bunch of other men just laughing and recording and hooting and hollering.
Why aren't these people in jail, Cincinnati PD?
And I know people in the Cincinnati PD.
Why aren't these people in jail for life?
The rest of their lives.
I can see them on the video.
Yeah, it's not like you don't know who they are.
I identify these folks.
These people, these people behaving this way, this is a hate crime.
Solve it.
He's very on target there in the sense of just, we know who these people are.
And by your definition, this is a hate crime.
And I don't personally, as I've said, ascribe to the belief that hate crimes are something we should use as labels.
I think they're simply there to allow the government extra power, extra leeway to call things that aren't crimes crimes.
Which is very right.
We've got these people on video.
They should be locked up.
Why?
Yeah, why aren't they being locked up?
Instead, they get $400 bail.
Yeah.
And the thing is, we know they're not being locked up.
We know they're not being locked up because they're of a certain skin color.
They're black.
That is.
That is one of the privileges that comes with being black.
If there are white privileges, one of the privileges of being black is that you can be more violent.
You can be violent towards white people, and people will co-sign it.
They'll always try to excuse it.
They'll say, What are the extenuating circumstances?
Did they say a word you didn't like?
Were they being naughty?
Well, in that case, feel free to assault that woman.
Break grandma's hip.
Slam her into the ground.
That's fine.
Assault that guy.
Do whatever you want.
How about you riot and burn down Luda City, too?
That's fine.
We'll be okay with it.
It's very sad to see the divide that has happened.
I'm not someone that thinks that, you know, we can be friends with everybody all the time.
But I do think as recently as the 90s, it was not this severe and it had not been, there wasn't this much violence and hatred between the races.
Maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe there was always this kind of issue.
But I think it has been worsened by media.
And I don't think we have to be this angry with each other all the time.
It's just, it is mind-boggling to see that level of just raw hatred on display.
This willingness to beat and abuse a woman.
I don't care what she did.
There is no need to do that to her.
You saw the pictures.
You saw what she looked like afterwards.
If I know some people will say, you know, feminism, you know, they fought for equality and therefore whatever you're, you know, if she starts a fight with you, you know, haul off and do whatever to her.
And I think that's, I guess, technically under the letter of the law.
Yes, you fought for equality.
So if you're going to act like a man, you could be treated like a man.
But I think if you are a man, you should realize that there is some level of restraint that you should show.
I mean, equality aside, it looks as though she's trying to pull someone off of someone on the ground and they turn around and full out punch her in the face from a big windup.
It's not exactly the same thing.
Even if it were a man, it still wouldn't be justified.
It's especially unjustified against a woman.
We're going to take a quick break.
When you come back, we're going to look at the Senate Committee and their passing of the Pelosi Act.
Stay with us.
You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Welcome back, folks.
I realized there's actually a little bit more we can talk about with this because we have the Cincinnati City Council woman here.
We can play this clip.
Let's take a look at it.
Another way to improve public safety is to provide for people's general welfare.
That is why I'm proud to have supported the Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
When people have housing, safe jobs, food to eat, and look forward to the future.
They are very less likely to be involved in gun violence.
That, of course, being the woman.
And of course, she cares so much about public health that she has to go after gun crimes and poverty.
Just not white people's public health.
Yeah.
That, of course, being Victoria Parks.
The woman that said they begged for that beat down.
I am grateful for the whole story.
Well, isn't that lovely?
She's very concerned about public health.
Preventing gun crime, I suppose, just doesn't matter.
We'll move on to Pelosi Act now, except we've got some comments.
Doug Duh, 007, racial hatred has really escalated.
My parents never put emphasis on racial differences, so it was never a big deal to me growing up.
I had friends of different races, and it was no big deal.
Yeah, the increase in racism is something that I've seen personally over the course of my lifetime.
It's been very noticeable.
Like, they have really revived racism by this constant push of racial divide and white privilege when, you know, clearly it's the other way around.
Yeah.
B.L. Houghton, who's now a monthly supporter.
Thank you, B.L. Houghton.
Star Barkley, the police never beat down George Floyd.
He was resisting arrest from the start and never stopped resisting arrest.
Bro, he was high.
Nights of the Storm.
George Floyd died from a fentanyl overdose.
He swallowed a bunch to hide it from the police.
Yeah, he was one of the worst.
There are cases where the police go too far, where the black community has legitimate grievances about police brutality.
But they continually pick ones where they are unjustified, where the police were doing their job in dealing with a criminal.
A criminal who then chooses to resist arrests, become violent, and cause a problem.
And as such, it's just again, they pick the worst cases to do this.
And I'm convinced it's on purpose from, you know, people who run Black Lives Matter, who are in on the grift, who are there to stoke and foment racial hatred.
Because as a general rule, if you have any common sense and you aren't just motivated by racial animus, you will look at the George Floyd case and go, no, this guy was a criminal.
He was a career criminal.
He was a terrible individual.
He was committing crimes that very day right up until the police showed up.
He would have continued to commit crimes.
And it is just that keeps the ball rolling.
I mean, there are clear cases of police brutality against people of all races, but they only focus on the black people.
And then they hold up cases that aren't, as you say, police brutality.
For instance, George Floyd in the autopsy showed that he died of a drug overdose, not of what the police did.
North American House Hippo.
Thank you very much for appreciating the tip.
Because he killed Jeffrey Epstein and he never existed.
Me and Elon have always been friends because Elon never talked about Epstein because Epstein was never born.
Anybody who says, I knew Jeffrey Epstein hung out with him, I had him at my wedding, Yvonca's wedding, and other family social events.
It's just fake news.
You're the fake news.
You're all losers and troublemakers.
I've never been on Epstein's plane.
I don't need to be on everyone's plane because I own my own 757.
It's made entirely of gold.
It's the greatest gold, and it doesn't matter because Epstein never existed anyway.
I'm also going to sign a pardon for Ghelane Maxwell because Epstein never existed.
Got to do it quick because Jamie Demon is holding a party for her on his yacht tonight.
Thank you very much, North American House Hippo.
And we've got a comment from Nights of the Storm.
When race is involved, the simple facts never come out.
Yeah.
The racial identity politics in the United States have become completely insane.
The simple fact of the matter is, just so long as you hate white people, just about anything else you do will be fine.
Sorry, I just had more to say about George Floyd going before.
So they had an autopsy that shows he dies of a drug overdose, and then they come after the cop that arrested him, and they arrest him and tried him under the grounds of, I forget what the actual legal term was, but it's the analogy was if someone has a skull as fragile as an eggshell and you push them or do something that a normal person would be okay with, but it kills them because they have the eggshell skull.
If you're a cop, you can be charged for that because you have to take into consideration all that.
Well, apparently he didn't take into consideration that he was dying of a drug overdose from drugs that he had taken before his arrest.
When you're a cop, you've got to consider that someone might have OD'd on fentanyl right before you got there.
They uphold these obviously fraudulent cases to further drive the racial divide.
Yeah.
Black Lives Matter is a completely scam institution.
It has been proven over and over again.
The people who run it have no interest in helping the black community.
They have no interest in doing anything of value for the black community.
Instead, they are interested in enriching themselves.
You see it over and over again.
And it is just truly amazing that it just keeps happening.
Radis Bro.
What's it even matter?
In school, your kids will learn George Floyd was a hero, but yet everyone still sends their kids to school.
Yeah.
Good old St. George Floyd.
He was a wonderful man.
A hero.
Someone to be lauded.
Sure, he held a pregnant woman at gunpoint.
Sure, he was trying to pass off fake 20s.
Sure, he died of a fentanyl overdose, but don't let that stop a good narrative.
Don't you want to loot a Nike store?
If you do, shut up.
As I said, we're going to look at the Senate Committee.
It says breaking Senate Committee passes Pelosi Act to ban stock trading, but not how you'd think.
Passed 8-7 with all Republicans voting against the bill, except Hawley, who was joined by all Democrats on the committee.
It's complicated.
Democrats joined the bill when Hawley agreed to get rid of the Pelosi Act name and expand those prohibited from stock trading to the president and vice president, except it will only apply to future administrations, meaning it doesn't apply to President Trump and VP Vance.
They don't really care if Trump and Vance do insider trading.
This is simply just a direct attack on Pelosi herself.
They're just trying to score some partisan points.
And it's funny.
I mean, it's funny and, you know, better than nothing, but it's, you know, it shows the partisan nature of things.
The uni party functions when it's trying to advance the agenda to crush the American people, to make our lives worse, to restrict our freedoms.
That doesn't mean the people at the top don't actually dislike each other or hate each other or want to get back at each other when possible.
The uni party, people say uni party, and then they want to act like, well, they all just get together and they swill cocktails and they pat each other on the back, and they're all good friends.
They're probably not.
They have an agenda they want to enforce on the American people, but these are all people with massive egos and have terrible personalities.
They probably all hate each other because they're all such despicable, hateable people.
Some of them.
The next politicians that get in, they aren't going to be allowed to this kind of corruption.
That gets passed.
Not us.
We get a pass.
Some Republicans didn't like the changes.
Like the original co-sponsor of the bill, Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno, who voted against it on those grounds.
Others simply feel that the bill is flawed.
A Senate committee voted to advance a bill that would ban stock trading by lawmakers, presidents, and vice president presidents, over objections from most Republicans and with a carve-out for President Donald Trump.
Senator Josh Hawley introduced the original bill barring members of Congress and their spouses from trading stocks.
It was named, to Democrats' dismay, for rep Nancy Pelosi, who has come under scrutiny for her husband's extensive trading without evidence, they say.
Extensive, without evidence that any of it was done using insider information from Capitol Hill.
Yeah, without evidence that any of it was done.
No, it's just that good of an investor.
Yeah.
Please ignore the fact that a lot of it relates to things that Pelosi was connected to politically.
Lawmakers have kept calls to ban member stock trading at bay for years, but pressure is increasingly mounting on congressional leaders to move on the issue.
I don't know when in this country it became a negative to make money, Scott said.
Well, I think when you're doing it with insider information, Rich Scott, I think that's when it became a problem.
I think when you're using your power and influence to affect the way stocks move and then using that information to make yourself a fortune, I think that might be when it became a problem.
In an apparent attempt to sink the bill among Democrats, committee chair Rand Paul argued the legislations should apply to Trump, not just future presidents, and suggested his Democratic colleagues would be voting to protect the incumbent if they supported the revised bill.
Paul Later called it the exemption for Donald Trump substitute.
Of course, Rand Paul's wife is the one that made a bunch of money on Gilead's stock.
So maybe the criticism rings a little hollow there, Rand.
Perhaps you're not exactly as squeaky clean on this kind of issue as you could be.
I mean, as the bill clearly implies, they don't want other people doing this kind of corrupt nonsense.
Only themselves should be allowed.
Only we get the pass.
Eggs cleared of cholesterol.
Blame is study exposes saturated fat as real heart risk.
My entire life growing up, they've never been able to make up their minds about eggs.
It's been this continual back and forth.
One month, eggs are bad, next month eggs are good, and so on and so forth.
Hopefully, they've come to a conclusion.
Personally, I've always erred on the side of eggs are good.
God created chickens.
Chickens create eggs.
Eggs are natural.
And as such, probably healthy.
Anytime you can remove yourself from these chemical concoctions that they push on you, they're probably good for you.
Eggs have a remarkable nutritional profile.
And when I was seriously working out, I was drinking like 12 raw eggs a day.
And they were incredible for muscle gain.
There was actually a golden era bodybuilder, Vince Garanda, that postulated that drinking, you know, eating 36 raw eggs a day would be the equivalent of taking a DN bowl steroid cycle if you were to keep it up for the allotted time period.
I don't remember what it was.
That there's some period that bodybuilders usually take that kind of steroid for, and if you were to eat those 36 eggs a day for that period, it would be the equivalent with the amount of cholesterol and protein.
It could have the same kind of effects.
Eggs have been wrongly blamed for raising cholesterol, but new research shows saturated fat, not eggs, is a real heart health threat.
Eating two eggs daily on a low-saturated fat diet lowers LDL cholesterol, debunking decades of flawed dietary advice.
Processed meats like bacon and sausage, not eggs, are linked to higher cardiovascular risk, according to this study.
Well, let's pump the brakes on saying bad things about sausage and bacon, okay?
Let's not get crazy with it here.
Bacon and sausage are a wonderful breakfast treat, and I don't, I will stand for no negative comments about them.
I will defend their honor.
For decades, eggs have been demonized by mainstream nutritionists, and government dietary guidelines is a cholesterol-raising villain blamed for clogging arteries and increasing heart disease risk.
But a groundbreaking new study from the University of South Australia has cracked open the truth.
Eggs aren't the problem.
In fact, you could probably say they're somewhat of a solution considering how rich in vitamins and nutrients they are.
In fact, they even say they lower the LDL.
All the nutritionists have egg on their face.
Uh-huh.
The yolks on them.
The uh again, this is just more evidence.
They have no idea what they're talking about.
These people continually assert things with no real evidence.
A new study came out.
Well, it says that eggs are bad.
And then two days later, a new study comes out: eggs are good.
Eggs are probably great for you, considering they're fairly natural.
If you can get them straight from the chickens, if you're raising your own chickens and eating their eggs, it's probably one of the best foods you can eat.
Probably.
In my opinion, gotta make all these qualifiers.
But doctors and these scientists can't agree on anything and they can't keep a story straight.
Apparently, just more evidence that all of this stuff, all these people that continually assert that they are the arbiters of all knowledge and all truth, can't even make a consensus between them.
SoloCat 1980, racism is a divide and conquer.
Tactic, Shelly A, it was done on purpose.
The CIA and Soros, or whoever are experts at these revolutions.
SoloCat 1980, BLM buying luxury mansions.
Doug the 007, also big lying Marxists, yes.
I'm personally of the opinion that there will always, like, anytime there are differences between individuals, you know, you will always have some level of friction.
You know, even, you know, between families, there will be some levels of friction between brothers and sisters and yada yada.
However, these differences can be played upon and exacerbated by people that want to cause division and problems.
You don't have to.
You don't have to hate each other.
You can acknowledge differences and accept that people want different things without screaming and hating and being violent with each other.
And that's what we should be working towards.
We are all God is our father.
He is everyone's father.
He created everything.
And as such, we should be striving to show his love to everyone and treat everyone the same way within reason.
Murderers, you know, self-defense is a different thing.
Knights of the Storm, the division in our society is driven by the leaders because they need us fighting one another so we don't unite and come after them.
Yeah.
If they keep you divided, you can't really focus on the real problem.
I do also, though, think it's important to realize, again, the uniparty at the top, that is, you know, they're working towards the same goals.
There is no uni party at the bottom.
MAGA and the left, while they may be achieving the same goals for the people at the top, you cannot make a coalition with the left.
They will stab you in the back immediately.
These people are full-on propagandists propagandized by the Marxists, and they need to be thoroughly deprogrammed before you can make any common cause with them.
And good luck doing that.
It is important to remember that uni party, while it functions at the top, does not function at the bottom in the sense of any sort of coalition.
You cannot make common cause with them.
You cannot even really be friends with them at this point until you go through a massive amount of work to deprogram them.
And it is sad to say that it is incredibly, you know, it's sad that this is how the divide is, but that is the truth of it.
You know, these college-educated Marxists hate you.
They would throw you into a gulag in an instant.
And just because they're, you know, they're posting memes about Trump being a pedophile, which he is, and they should, does not mean that you can make any sort of common cause with them on anything.
They will immediately round you up and throw you into the gulag.
Maluten Milankovic, eggs are a great high source of choline.
Chili, make eggs great again.
Chickens are making eggs great every day.
Just get yourself some chickens and have them lay in the eggs.
Chickens are a just an amazing animal to keep when it comes to providing you resources.
They lay eggs, they eat bugs, and when it comes down to it, when the chicken is old and had its use, you can, you know, pluck them and throw them into a soup pot.
Make delicious chicken soup.
Chickens are a wonderful animal.
Not so much in the sense that I want to be around them or keep them as a pet, but wonderful when it comes to creating food.
I'm Marty.
And again, thank you, Marty.
We really do appreciate all the support.
It was incredible of you for the matching funds yesterday.
Rick Scott has received over $657,000 from APAC.
Rick is pleased with that windfall didn't involve playing the stock market.
That's right.
Why take risks when you can just sell out the American people and get guaranteed money?
Tunnel Lord 1337.
I was reading a Cheerio's box and it claimed to have more truth more nutrients than eggs.
What a joke.
Oh, I'm sure.
That's right.
These little, you know, semi-cardboard rings, they've got more nutrients than eggs.
Nibru 2029, eggs are declared bad every time a new crony alternative comes around.
Yeah.
Turns out, eggs are actually bad.
Buy this soy-tofu mixture instead.
Lieutenant Malankovic, saturated fat is vilified because it probably boosts testosterone or something.
They want us soy boys.
Yeah, eggs are truly amazing.
If you are looking to put on muscle and you have the money to afford it at this point, because my goodness, or you have chickens of your own.
Raw eggs.
I'm not saying, I'm not saying to drink them because, you know, you can get salmonella.
Warning, warning, warning.
However, when I was doing that, I put on muscle very rapidly.
I was only doing 12, not 36.
I don't think I could handle 36 eggs in a day.
I think I'd throw up.
Mark E. Mark, NJ.
Thank you much.
Thank you very much for the support.
Appreciate it.
I think that the Uni Party is like your father says, they're like the different mafia families in the Godfather.
You have the Corleonis versus the Tataglias and the Barzinis.
Yeah.
They're all working towards a goal, which is the destruction of freedom and liberty.
However, they don't necessarily like each other.
They don't necessarily get along.
They might all go to these weird sort of Bohemian Grove establishment party things, but there's probably cliques that form.
I mean, when you're this level of sociopath and this hateful towards the American people, you have to imagine that it manifests itself in other ways.
I don't imagine people like Peter Thiel or Jeff Bezos or Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk could are going to get along with each other either.
They're all highly egomaniacal.
Nibiru 2029, Caligula Trump's warp speed injections have clogged more arteries since 2020 than eggs have through the whole of human history.
Yeah.
Eggs are, again, just a wonder food.
They do so much for us.
Cannot get enough egg.
Need more eggs in our life.
More eggs, less soy manufactured nonsense.
Do not obey.
It says they engineer chaos by financing both sides of revolutions, movements and civil wars, and create order by providing solutions.
Yeah.
Like, generate chaos and provide you the solution to it.
That's how they operate.
They operate like that across the globe.
We've seen it over and over again.
Color revolutions in other countries, and there's no reason to assume they wouldn't use the same tactics here, because they work.
UK police arrest Gardner in his own garden for carrying trowel and a sickle.
The UK is not a serious country.
The UK is a joke that is being perpetrated upon us.
I refuse to believe these aren't all actors staging it for our benefit.
Manchester police arrested and charged a gardener for possessing an offensive weapon.
Now, they mean it as offensive or were they offended by it?
Were they offended that this man might be able to defend himself?
With interrogating officers refusing to accept his tools, had a purpose, even asking to have what an allotment garden is explained to them.
The UK is not hiring their best and brightest for the police.
They are not hiring people that care about the law.
To be fair, neither are we as a general rule.
I know that we have kind of been, you know, we've praised the police a little bit in the past few days, and I do want to make it clear that the police need massive reform here in the United States.
Just because we're saying, you know, they should be doing their job doesn't mean I don't think that they need to be changed and reformed.
And it's just this man, the UK police are every bit the meme that people joke about.
oh you got a license for that they posted a If you remember that.
These people, the UK is a joke.
I've seen several tweets that the UK police have put out where they have just random trash and junk.
And they're like, we just successfully got these dangerous weapons out of the hands of criminals.
The UK police deserve to be mocked.
They have.
Meanwhile, they do nothing about the rape gangs and the mass stabbings and acid attacks.
Can't do anything about that.
We gotta go harass these people because, you know, this man was gardening and he had a trowel and sickle.
He was arrested and interrogated while gardening in his own garden.
In his own garden, they show up and like, oi, you got a license for that sickle?
Oi, might, you come with me.
You're coming down to the, you're coming down the yard.
At the time of his arrest, Roe was using a small gardener's sickle to cut the hedge and had a sheathed Japanese weeding trowel known as a horihori on his belt.
Officers are claimed to have refused to believe the trowel was a gardening tool.
And in a statement on the arrest referred to it as a large dagger and another item as a peeling knife.
He's got a careful, he's got a large dagger.
He's a threat.
The Hori Hori shot to prominence in the United Kingdom last year when it became a mini viral sensation.
It was named a must-have Christmas present for keen gardeners.
Brilliant for weeding, chopping, digging holes for planting, and super comfortable to handle.
May also land you in jail if you're in the UK.
Cause the bobbies are idiots.
They're fools.
No, no, we're not going to do anything about the rape gangs.
What's that?
You've got a trowel?
You're coming with me.
Roe was interviewed without a lawyer present as officers told him they'd been unable to find one.
He reported having been asked some bizarre and probing questions when he was being when he was held, stating they started asking questions like if I was autistic or anything like that, asking me whether I'd ever been in the army, whether I told people I was in the army.
Hey, would you make a good Patsy?
Are you autistic?
Have you been in the Army?
Are you someone we could set up for some?
That's what this feels like.
This feels like what the FBI would do.
Like, you know, they find you in a chat room, just like, hey, buddy, are you autistic?
Any chance?
Any interest in being a government stooge?
Any chance we could ship you some materials that might be used to make a bomb and then you could arrest you?
Have you ever read Catcher in the Rye?
That's why I'm unlearning how to read.
No one's gonna MK Ultra me with Catcher in the Rye.
That's for Don and Sure.
He was asked whether he was planning on doing something with what the police claimed were weapons, and he was required to explain in very basic terms what a community garden allotment is.
He's thinking about doing something.
These people eventually Roe accepted a caution from police in order to be allowed to go home.
He's now worried that will remain on his criminal record and make finding work difficult.
What is a caution?
Does it go on your permanent record?
You've got to accept a caution for us to let you go home.
You've been a naughty boy.
You've been a naughty boy for using gardening tools in your own garden.
What utter buffoons.
What morons.
I could not even imagine being this kind of individual.
I would feel such shame.
What level of idiot do you have to be to wake up every day and go to this job where you harass gardeners in their own garden for using a trowel?
Found a few more pictures of some of the horrendous weapons that the UK have gotten off the streets.
Let's bring them up.
Let's bring them up and look at this so we can thank the UK police for keeping the people of the United Kingdom safe.
Sorry, but there's no quality there, but look at those.
There's pliers, scissors, a screwdriver, multiple screwdrivers, in fact.
And then something looks like a file.
Well, thank you, United Kingdom Police.
They got the bicycle wheel off the street here.
My goodness.
You never know what someone could do with a bicycle wheel.
Here's the higher resolution.
The UK police are nothing but enemies of the UK people.
We have it bad here in the United States.
The police here are, you know, they do the wrong thing.
They assault people.
They brutalize people.
The UK police are on another level when it comes to hating the citizenry of their own country.
It is truly despicable the way they treat their own people.
Even in this most recent story, this tweet is a bit ironic.
Here's how we turn guns into gardening tools.
Although they're still illegal, those are still dangerous weapons.
Sorry.
Wait a minute.
You got our old.
You can never appease these people.
It will never be enough for them.
No.
If you turn in your guns, they come for the knives.
Whatever is next.
Nope, sorry.
You can't have a screwdriver even.
You got a gardening implement?
Off to jail.
Directly to prison.
Don't pass go.
The UK is a clown country.
Even very basic items like pepper spray for self-defense are strictly outlawed.
There are very clear exceptions in the legislation for carrying things like knives in public for work.
This allows, for instance, a carpenter to carry chisels on his way to a job or a farmer or fisherman to carry a knife when they have reasonable grounds or expecting to need a knife while pursuing a lawful activity.
This is this is abs.
This is just insane.
No, you can't carry a knife unless you've got reasonable grounds.
We'll decide if you can carry that knife.
Are you on your way to a job where you might need it?
Prove it.
Prove it.
You know, I grew up carrying knives because, you know, you occasionally run into something where you need to use a knife to open something or whatever.
You don't necessarily know what you're going to need a knife for.
It's a useful tool just in general.
I literally.
I have a knife on me 99% of the time.
It is just part of my attire, as Lance said.
They're just useful.
They're good to have on you because you're constantly running into little scenarios.
They're like, oh, it'd be useful to have it here.
Need to cut something open, need to cut a piece of string or this or that.
No, you're not allowed to do that in the United Kingdom.
You're a presumed criminal.
We can't be trusting you with a sharp implement.
The UK government also allows a knife to be carried for religious reasons, such as their herpons some Sikhs carry.
And as part of any national costume, the Sikhs get to carry kerpons.
And, you know, if you're part of the guards or something, you're allowed to carry a sword, I guess.
No.
No average citizen can just carry a knife around.
Not allowed to do that.
London police faced mockery online and eventually deleted a tweet when they boasted of getting a round-tipped butter knife off the streets.
The spokesman said the sheer volume of notifications from the post was distracting officers from their work.
They got ratioed.
They got blown out.
People looked at this and pointed out what utter buffoons they were being, and they had to hang their heads in shame and delete the tweet.
Oh, oh, that's very rude of you.
We did a good job here.
We got a knife off the streets, didn't we?
These people deserve every bit of shame and mockery that can be heaped upon them.
They are the utter.
They've completely given up on doing anything of value for the UK people.
You can see there, look at that weapon of mass destruction, that implement of terror.
Isn't it wonderful that they got that off the street?
So thankful to them.
Cannot thank them enough.
What a joke.
As I said, the UK is not a serious country.
It is.
Some diabolical criminal mastermind dulled this knife so that it would hurt more.
Exactly.
It was all part of his despicable plan.
I mean, can you imagine getting beaten to death with that tire?
It's got rubber on the outside, so it goes slower.
These are all implements specifically crafted to elongate the torture.
These criminals, how could they be so devious?
Shadowboxer, rogs and raw milk are the highest nutrient foods out there.
Raw isn't as dangerous as they told us, but I still boil my eggs for six minutes.
A good soft-boiled egg is delicious.
Delicious.
Knights of the Storm, Gates is involved in four alternative food companies, with one being fake eggs.
The bird flu lie came about after he got involved with the fake eggs.
Surprise, surprise, huh?
Funny how it all keeps turning up.
Turning up for Bill Gates.
From where you're sitting, it might seem like a 24-karat run of bad luck, but the truth is the game was rigged from the start.
Chevkin, the UK is like a Monty Python skit show.
Honestly, it's probably more insane than anything Monty Python could have envisioned.
It's probably more dystopian and Orwellian.
Things are probably crazier than anything in George Orwell at this point.
I'm sure things are just more ridiculous than we would ever know.
Tunnel Lord 1337.
I wonder if the UK police will ban anvils so people can't make knives.
Probably, and that way they also can't set up any sort of wildly coyote-esque trap for when the ruffians come to their house, you know?
Jonathan Quayle Higgins 3rd VC always carry a spoon.
That's right.
You never know.
You could probably get away with a spoon at this point, but the days are coming where even the spoon will be banned.
Sorry, you were going to use it for some illegal scooping and harvesting.
We can't have you doing that.
Guard Goldsmith.
My Irish ancestors would have used potato peelers to rebel, I think.
The Irish are truly one of the everyone else.
The British were able to subjugate much larger countries far more easily than they were with Ireland.
There was something about Ireland that gave them unique problems.
The Irish refused to give in for a very long time.
They gave them many, many issues for years.
No matter what they did, they could not get the Irish to fully submit.
Guard Goldsmith, a caution like a yellow flag in soccer?
It seems that way.
Here take your warning and go.
It's going on your permanent record.
You'll be noted as an individual that needs cautioning.
Who knows how this system functions?
It's completely divorced from reality, so it's very difficult to interpret and intuit what they mean.
I can't put myself in the shoes of these lunatics that make these logs.
They're so completely foreign to me.
I cannot fathom it.
Guard Goldsmith.
Meanwhile, a few miles away, the UK makes drones for the IDF to kill Palestinians.
Well, of course, you know.
No sharp implements for your people.
But the IDF can blow up and maim children.
That's how this works.
I want to thank the people that contributed yesterday.
This is via check and subscribe star tips.
These are tips.
Milutin Milankovic, BL Houghton.
Oh, these are the ones that came in yesterday, so.
Thanked you all yesterday.
But you know what?
Let's do it again.
G Talent60, Con think, Malutin Milankovic, Guard Goldsmith, Knights of the Storm, B. Turner 170, Stealth Patriot, Bumbling Homesteader, Dustin D. Helm, Columbo 27, I'm Marty, KWD68, Little Johnny Boy, Shabri, Radisbro, BL Houghton again,
Trucker Chris for the win from Subscribestar, Mark Corallo and Theophile, Tawney, Cash App, Derek, Jesse H, Zell, Janice, W,
Lisa K, Ryan F, Charles D, Julie W., Kimberly C, Susan L., Charles M., Ronald H., and Kenneth C. Really thank you all, and we are at 7-8 for the month.
So we are almost right at the goal line, right there.
We cannot thank you all enough for everything you've done to get us there.
We really do appreciate it.
North American House Hippo knives are useful, guns are even more useful.
Yeah.
If you're in a self-defense situation, a firearm is what you want.
You want to be able to resolve that situation as quickly and efficiently as possible.
You don't want to be trying to get in close for some stabbing action.
If that's what you, if a knife is what you've got, a knife is what you'll use.
But ideally, you have a firearm and you can resolve the situation from a safe distance for yourself.
Even with firearms, people can.
It's not like in the movies where you get one shot and they go down.
Generally, you know, someone is charging at you.
They can still close distance and you want to be cognizant of that.
Guns are the ultimate self-defense tool.
North American House Hippo.
Then there's the television license, a license to watch television.
Yeah.
The UK, as I keep saying, is not a serious country.
It is a joke.
It is being perpetrated on all of us, and specifically the people of the UK.
Brit Belly, Starmer said he has had 400 people arrested over online comments.
Starmer is such a tyrant.
Such a pathetic loser.
Getting people arrested for what they say online is some of the most pathetic, just nannying you could think of.
They said, they said mean words online, and so we're going to look them up.
We're going to throw away the key.
I cannot believe this.
People getting in trouble for their online social media comments has always been anathema to me.
Just is this what you said on Twitter?
Did you say a naughty word on Twitter?
We're going to get you fired from your job.
What losers?
Doug to 007.
Don't get between the British and their gardens.
That's right.
The British have an instinctive yearn for gardening.
You can see it with JR Tolkien.
When he writes about the hobbits, you can kind of tell they're supposed to be the stand-in for the average British people.
That's who he really loves.
He loves Hobbitson.
He loves the small, the Appreciative of nature.
He loves the garden himself, and that's why he devotes so much time to them.
And that's why they're kind of the avatars that we use to go through the story.
Not necessarily the whole time.
You know, we do follow Aragorn and these other characters, but realistically, they're the ones we can relate to the easiest.
Because that's who Jarer Tolkien relates to.
That's who he sees himself as.
He wants to be a hobbit.
He wants to live a small, happy, clean life.
He wants to till the earth, grow his own garden, smoke his own pipe, and, you know, not have to worry about the problems of the wider world.
You can kind of see that.
He wants, he loves the hobbits more than the other races, I think.
And I think rightfully so.
And yet, the cops apparently don't know what a garden is.
Why would you need a knife to stab the ground?
What?
Oi, you stabbing Mother Earth?
Off to jail with you.
Brit Belly, they let Muslim terrorists kill people with machetes.
And if you mention it online, you get arrested.
Starmer will be banning all tools soon.
Yeah.
If you're a Muslim, if you're committing terror acts, if you're murdering the local, you know, the original white population, feel free.
Keep at it.
We approve of that.
But if you're a white, if you're a white guy doing some gardening, we're going to throw you in prison.
Throw you in jail.
We're going to haul you off and give you a caution.
The UK is not a serious country.
Stay with us, folks.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show
The David Knight Show You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, Jet Laus.
Your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate, it is disinformation and misinformation.
followed closely by polarization within our societies.
Music In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Welcome back, folks, and we are now into the second hour of the David Knight Show.
I want to remind you: if you would like to support the show, we ask that you please do.
If you find value in it, go to davidknight.news.
You can see all the ways to support the show there.
There's Cash App, Zelle, Bitcoin address, the P.O. box, which is David Knight, P.O. Box 994, Kodak, Tennessee, 37764, and Subscribestar, which is subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight Show.
You can go there and see all the different tiers.
If one fits your budget, we ask that you consider it.
We ask that you support the show.
Of course, there's our affiliates.
There's David Knight.gold.
Tony Arderburn has set that up so that if you are looking to accumulate gold and silver and get outside the fiat monetary system, you can go through us to him.
There is rncstore.com.
If you're looking to take control of your health, see if their products might be the right fit for you.
Promo code Knight for 10% off.
There's trendsjournal.com.
Again, Salente works very, very hard on it.
It's massive.
He provides a lot of information.
There's no fluff in the Trends Journal.
If you use promo code Knight, you get 10% off there as well.
And it works out to be $2.50 a week.
There's also Homestead Products.shop.
Again, promo code Knight for 10% off.
They've got all kinds of different handmade, made in America products.
Got this deodorant right here, which is Rosemary Mint.
It smells very nice.
High quality.
We've got all kinds of different products.
Also, this alkalizing mineral toothpaste.
Many, many different products.
Promo code Knight for 10% off there as well.
Some of them may be useful and valuable to you.
So go check them out and see what they've got going on.
Brian Deb McCartney.
When our friends visited the U.S. from London, they were afraid to pack arrowheads that were found on an excursion.
They said they would have to declare them at customs or face arrest.
How far the British have fallen.
How far that country has sunk.
It's truly ridiculous.
Nope, you can't have any sort of potentially sharp instrument.
Oh, you've got arrowheads.
Well, you know, what if you were to, I don't know, put them between your knuckles and start punching people, I guess.
It's a ridiculous, utterly ridiculous country.
I feel bad for the people that are trapped underneath it.
Very heartless system, RFK Jr. takes aim at vaccine injury compensation program.
Kennedy said mainstream media is brain dead when it comes to this issue.
They will not criticize.
They will not report vaccine injury.
Of course, RFK Jr. is not going to ban mRNA vaccines, vaccines, bioweapons either.
Seems like he's not really interested in that.
Kennedy said the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, VICP, has devolved into this very, very heartless system.
It hasn't evolved.
It was designed like this from the start.
This was always the goal to deny people.
They'll set up something like this.
That way they can say, look, no, we're doing something, but it's ostensibly there to make sure they don't have to do anything.
It's kind of a pressure release valve.
If you pretend to be doing something, people are less angry.
Look, no, something's being done.
Heartless system that is designed to deny vaccine injury and to deny compensation to people who badly need it.
That's what it was always meant for.
We can't gaslight the parents.
We can't gaslight the children.
We can't marginalize and vilify the doctors and de-license the doctors who report injuries.
We can't punish and retract articles by the scientists who document those injuries.
We have to start being honest again with the American public, says Kennedy.
Well, then, I think you could start by condemning what's going on with the warp speed vaccinations.
You could go out there and point out what your boss got up to.
Say, hey, look, you know, we're sorry, but the warp speed vaccinations are causing massive issues.
It was a gigantic scam.
The American people have been poisoned.
Now, we're going to focus on red dye and things like that.
And I'm thankful for those things.
I do think it's a good little step here and there, but it's again these shuffling the deck chairs around on the Titanic type of things that he does.
This is not the main problem.
For Love of the Road, at David Night Show, are the Sons of Confederate Veterans still a sponsor?
Do we tell them we heard about them through you or how does it work?
Actually, so the way ConThink said he really would like us to play that, and we really like, you know, we were, my dad has always taught us the real history, you know, War of Northern Aggression.
So we were never directly contacted by Sons of Confederate veterans.
Conthink sponsored that one specifically.
So it's not that I just continually forget to play it because they've got so many other ones on here and I need to play it more frequently.
So we're not getting any kickback from them.
Conthink, he sponsored it and we wanted to play it anyway.
So we appreciate ConTink sponsoring it.
We just think it's a good thing to play.
You know, it's something worthwhile to let people know about.
And the War of Northern Aggression is one that we have.
My dad was deeply passionate about when we were younger.
We would routinely be told how wicked Lincoln was.
It made for some very interesting conversations with our friends when in public school they're being taught that Lincoln is the greatest president of all time.
And we're like, what are you talking about?
The man was a mass murderer.
He killed a massive portion of the population.
He didn't free the slaves.
The Emancipation Proclamation only affected territories he didn't control.
What are you talking about?
It was made for some heated arguing back and forth.
But it was good times.
It was back when you could actually argue with people about stuff and not have them call your job and tell you what an evil racist you are.
Since 1986, VICP has paid over $5.4 billion to 12,000 different people.
It is.
Again, the vaccines are they've been harming people and the mRNA vaccines are even more damaging.
There's far more people that have been injured that we don't know about simply because of how difficult it is to diagnose these things.
For one, it's difficult because they can take time to manifest these symptoms depending on how your immune system handles it.
For two, they have such a wide-ranging array of symptoms.
Even standard vaccines tend to cause weird and strange reactions.
Then three, doctors desperately do not want to diagnose them as vaccine injuries because it can lead to problems for them.
There's a host of different issues when it comes to diagnosing vaccine injuries.
Original Babe, all they have to do is reverse the law that protects the vaccine company so they will be 100% liable.
Watch how fast they pull all vaxes, childhood and adult, maybe even pet vaxes.
Yeah, if you were to get rid of that liability shield, they would be forced to.
Personally, if I were to be in charge and if I were to remove that liability, I would make it retroactive.
Sorry, actually, this never existed.
You never had it.
And in fact, everyone involved with your company since then can be held liable.
Every single person involved is liable.
Because it's not just a matter of, you know, enriching yourselves.
It's a matter of poisoning American people, of killing children.
So every single person, I would hold them all responsible.
Every single person who worked for these companies, I would throw them all into prison.
I would not, I would not spare the rod.
They would all end up in some place like Alligator Alcatraz.
No, you don't get to poison generations of children.
You don't get to cause them harm.
Like that and get away with it.
Sorry.
Off to Guantanamo Bay.
U.S. citizen.
This U.S. citizen recorded an immigration arrest.
Officers told him to delete it or face charges.
A peaceful traffic stop in Florida turned violent after immigration officers arrived and used chokeholds and a stun gun to make arrests.
Immigration officers were caught on video celebrating proudly after using chokeholds and a stun gun to arrest two undocumented immigrants in Florida.
The owner of the video, an 18-year-old American citizen, was threatened and charged after he refused to delete the footage, revealing the harsh tactics used by immigration authorities to meet the Trump administration's mass deportation goals.
Kenny Lynez Ambrosio was on his way to work on the morning of May 2nd with his mother and two other men in North Palm Beach, Florida, when the vehicle was pulled over by a Florida Highway Patrol officer.
Initial reason for the stop is unclear, but after the FHP called in customs and border protection, the peaceful traffic stop quickly turned violent.
Ambrosio began recording when CBP agents arrived and a female officer can be heard asking if anyone in the car is an undocumented immigrant.
One of Ambrosio's friends answered that he was.
That's when they said, okay, let's go.
Before anyone was able to exit the vehicle, CBP officers became aggressive.
One officer put his hand inside the window.
He said, popped the door open, grabbed my friend by the neck, and had him in a chokehold.
And the video can be heard telling officers, you can't grab me like that.
When the man lands on his feet while being pulled from the vehicle, officers push him to the ground and then pull him back to his feet while one officer keeps him in a headlock.
Ambrosio, who's also forced to the ground, can be heard yelling, that's not how you arrest people.
If y'all are going to arrest people, y'all have to arrest people regular.
I'll give him a pass.
It's a stressful situation.
I won't critique his grammar.
I won't be that much of a pedant at the moment.
He then tells his friend in Spanish, don't resist.
Don't resist.
And let me be clear.
When I am fully in the camp of know your rights and assert your rights.
However, you need to be aware that when the police show up and they decide that you are going to jail, you are going to jail.
Fight them in court.
Do not try to fight them in the street.
Assert your rights when and where you are not going to get shot for it.
If you end up in a situation where they're in the wrong, sue them for it later.
Live to fight another day.
If you give them an excuse to pull a gun on you, it is going to go badly.
These guys are keyed up.
They're not people you want to piss off in that sense.
Fight them in court.
It's like that saying, you can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride.
If the cop decides you are going to jail, you are going.
That is how it's going to go down 99.9% of the time.
Yeah, you should know your rights, though.
In this particular case, it's someone that is here illegally.
Yeah, I'm not speaking about this.
I'm saying in general for other purposes.
You know, if you're someone that's pulled over by the cops, assert your rights, know your rights.
But if it reaches the point where the cop is about to say, you know, step out of the vehicle, chances are you are going to jail.
Assert your rights, but do it in such a way as you're not going to end up shot in the back on the street.
Sue them in court.
Get a judgment.
Do not end up one of these guys that we have to march for.
And so far in this thing, I mean, I don't know how violent the police are being while they're arresting this guy.
There's a video in here that I can play.
But it's reasonable for them to arrest this person.
So far, the police haven't done anything really wrong, unless they're being obsessively violent.
If you can drop the audio down, we'll play it.
There's a good bit of language in there, and I'd rather not have to bleep this out later.
Warning, some viewers may find the following footage distressing.
It says, question, who is here illegally?
says the officer.
If you don't tell the truth, you'll get more charges and spend more time in jail.
I'm here illegally.
What?
I didn't hear.
Illegally.
Teacher Kenny Ambrosio, U.S. citizen, was driving to work with his mother and two male friends.
Renault Patrol officers asked everyone in the van to identify themselves and called for backup.
Wait, hold up.
Open the door.
Hold up.
Hold up.
Nothing?
What?
You guys have no rights to do that.
You don't have rights to do that?
No.
and you can see they've got this guy in a headlock And it doesn't look like that.
It's hard to say.
Yeah.
Hey wait, that's not how you arrest people?
Alright, hold on, hold on.
The guy's just got his taser out and ready.
hey that's not how you arrest people you're all going to arrest people you'll have to do What are y'all doing?
Don't resist.
Don't resist.
What am I doing?
Looks like...
Yeah.
And again, even if the cops are wrong, they will kill you.
You know, they have...
If they decide that you are getting arrested, you are Getting arrested, and you really don't want to end up in jail after being tased or shot.
Fight them in court, get the judgment, assert your rights there, because you can do a better job of it than if you end up dead.
I was born and raised right here, he says, I was born and raised here.
I have rights.
You think you got rights?
Depends, I guess, who's arresting you at the time.
Once she got that, you're funny, bro.
Who's funny?
This guy smells like inaudible.
He does.
They're starting to resist more now.
We're going to end up shooting some of them, inaudible.
These are the officers speaking because they're going to start fighting.
Like this kid goes like, and it becomes inaudible.
No, you can't do that.
I'm not doing anything.
We were told you already get out.
You either get out or I'm going to pull you out.
Right.
Profanity.
He goes, woo!
I think we've seen the important part of that.
Yeah.
They do.
And the funny thing is, if that were it, that would be way less embarrassing than them trying to take away a legal recording done by an American citizen.
That's where they crossed the line.
Yeah, the demand that he delete the footage is more embarrassing to me than that.
Yeah, that was hardly anything.
Maybe I'm just desensitized from the amount of violence I've seen from cops over the years, but that seems fairly innocuous when it comes to traffic stops.
Considering the fact that I've seen people, you know, shot or severely beaten for things.
Perhaps, as I said, I'm desensitized.
I mean, also, again, they do have two illegal immigrants in the car there with them.
And he just flat out admits, yeah, I'm here illegally, but then starts to resist.
Just like, you're here illegally.
Sorry to say, I personally err on the side of we send you back.
That's just my own personal feelings on the matter.
I mean, it's interesting the different perspectives on this.
Like, the one person thought that they could clearly state, I'm here illegally, and there would be absolutely no consequences, which really kind of shows the policy what it's been for quite some time.
Yeah.
And yeah, it's interesting.
And then I would say it wasn't an unreasonable arrest.
It was just unreasonable to ask.
To demand that they delete the footage.
Yeah, I don't think I don't think it shows anything too extreme.
Again, in the footage, the guy talks about how they're starting to resist more, probably going to end up shooting them.
That could be interpreted as potentially being excitement over the fact they're going to get to shoot and kill people, which I do not condone.
I don't think you should be excited over the potentiality of using violence and killing people.
But I do think, you know, guy's here illegally.
He's breaking the law, so sorry.
In the video, we can be here telling officers, you can't grab me like that.
You'll have to arrest people regular.
Recording continues after the three men are in custody and captures the officers' candid remarks.
A couple officers can be heard cracking jokes about how one man smells and bragging about the stun gun use.
One officer remarks on how they're starting to resist more.
Other responds are going to end up shooting some of them because they're going to start fighting.
Just remember, you can smell that inaudible with a $30,000 bonus.
Whatever that means.
Officers say miss post-arrest celebrations.
After his arrest and six-hour detention at a CBP station, Ambrosio told the garden he was threatened with charges if he didn't delete the exposing video.
When he refused, he was charged with obstruction without violence for having allegedly interfered with CBP officers' arrest.
I don't think that's a valid charge either.
Didn't seem like he was doing anything to really interfere.
And in fact, you could see him telling his friend to not resist them.
So if anything, he was not obstructing.
He was doing his best to help the officers by trying to get the guy to not resist.
So I think this is a bogus charge.
So when he refused, he was charged with obstruction without violence for having allegedly interfered with CBP officers' arrest, a first-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $1,000 fine and one year of incarceration.
It seems like one year of incarceration is a $1,000 fine.
That's bad, but $1,000 generally, it's probably manageable for most people.
It's not an insignificant sum of money, but it's probably not going to destroy your life.
One year in prison, though, one year of incarceration, that's a gigantic problem.
He was ultimately sentenced to 10 hours of community service and a four-hour anger management course.
The two undocumented men were transferred to the Chrome Detention Center in Miami.
Ambrosio believes if they were, believes they were released on bail and are awaiting a court hearing, but said it was been difficult to stay in touch with them.
The federal government has imposed quotas for the arrest of immigrants.
Anytime law enforcement is compelled to work towards a quota, it poses a significant risk to other rights.
And I agree with that.
If they cannot, they will start trying to find other ways to meet quota.
They will start trying to find other people that they can use to meet that quota.
Now, it may be more difficult if you're looking for illegal immigrants, just because, as a general rule, illegal immigrants fit certain profiles.
And if that's the standard, then you're going to have a harder time putting those on other people.
Well, again.
The brutal tactics used by federal officers under the Trump administration against mostly non-violent immigrants, including people on their way to work and who pose no threat to public safety, will only serve to degrade constitutional protections and subject more people to the government's abuse of power.
And I think that's where the real issue with this.
As we've said before, that's where the real issue lies.
I'm all for getting illegal immigrants out of the country.
I'm all for tamping down on legal immigration.
I think we need to slow it down.
And I think we need to reassess the people we've let in here.
If you've got an H-1B visa, personally, I'd be like, no, get out.
Sorry.
So long.
Goodbye.
We're busy at the moment.
Closed for business.
Yeah, well, it is reasonable to arrest someone when they ask, are you here illegally?
And they say, yes, that's entirely reasonable.
It is also kind of strange.
Like, why were they pulling him over in the first place?
Is this a common thing or something that's going to be the policy now to just pull people over and check to see their immigration status?
Yeah, it is curious.
They didn't say why they pulled them over, and as such, makes you wonder, hmm, what's going on here?
North American House, hey, are cops so stupid they don't know that with streaming video technology and instant backups, purporting to delete the video on the local device does nothing.
Even dash cams live stream now, yeah.
It was just a stupid, worthless request.
It really goes, again, just that's where I have the biggest problems with it.
Charging this kid with a crime for obstruction when I don't think there's the shadow of a case of that and telling him to delete the footage to me is thuggish behavior.
Thuggish behavior.
Shadowboxer, I think most cops are still good people, if just a little clueless.
I show them respect every time.
Sometimes they're shocked by that.
I do think a lot of cops are still good people.
And like you said, I think the average American is just completely and utterly clueless.
And so the average cop is completely clueless as well.
I don't think I don't want to believe it's the norm that people are going in there to be like, hey, I get to abuse my power now, boy.
I can't wait to stomp down on people.
I can't wait to be the boot.
I think it's just they don't understand what the rights of the people actually are and don't educate themselves.
And as such, are just an enforcement arm and are willing to carry out orders.
Not that that's a defense.
I was just following orders is not a defense, but I don't think they're out there, most of them, maliciously excited to stomp the skull in.
I mean, the problem got much worse under the Obama administration when he changed the training.
He put out shoot first curriculum.
Yeah, and that, along with the militarization and tactics provided by the equipment they give them, has had a systemic effect on it, in addition to many other issues with the system.
But yeah, a lot of cops, probably most cops, are genuinely trying to do something good, but they filter out those people, whether through hiring practices or vaccine mandates.
It's getting worse and worse.
Yeah, of course.
Even back in the day, you had people like Frank Serpico exposing the corruption that was going on.
So there is a large, administrative, a large minority of cops who are involved in corruption.
And if other cops won't call them out on it, won't point it out, won't do anything about it, they are still part of the problem.
So if a cop knows about the corruption, does nothing, to me, they're still just as bad as the people who are directly involved.
North American House, hey, boy, it's worth remembering that no cop on the streets today has ever known an America where you didn't need ID everywhere, didn't have metal detectors in schools, stadiums, theme parks, even buses and trains.
Yeah.
It's that America is gone.
You know, this perhaps, again, I'm desensitized, and that video should be shocking to me.
But considering the things I've seen and the America I've grown up with, that to me looks like a very reasonable use of force, especially versus someone who is not an American citizen.
Shadowboxer, my position is that if there were no cops, things would get a lot worse.
I do think we need some level of regulatory enforcement.
We need people that will enforce the laws.
I do think you need to be capable of defending yourself and that you should take responsibility for your own defense, but there are certain people that can't do that.
You know, not that cops are there to defend you.
Generally, they're there to pick up the pieces afterward, but look, ideal scenarios and all things being equal, yada yada yada.
You get what I'm trying to say, I think.
I want to believe in a better police force.
I want to work towards reforming them and reforming them.
I'm not one of those people that wants to completely disband the police and throw them away forever.
There are problematic elements, but I think they are something that we need.
Especially with how many lunatics there are out and about today.
Guard Goldsmith.
Americans who claim to support the U.S. Constitution must acknowledge that immigration is a state issue, and the word doesn't appear in the U.S. Constitution.
And Guard Goldsmith is very good on this.
If you want someone who is a hardliner about states' rights and can back everything he says up, look at Guard.
And I tend to side with him simply based on the fact that the federal government is such a monstrous entity.
And anytime it gets involved with something, it gets worse that you don't really want them to be handling things.
I think state by state, you could do a much more efficient job of it, too.
Each state handling their own immigration policies the way they want.
And if your state decides, hey, well, we want an unlimited free flow of illegal immigration.
Well, you know, immigration, they will immediately implode.
They will become unlivable.
And as such, you could flee that and go somewhere else.
You could also then quarantine them.
Just say, nope, you don't get to leave.
Tunnel Lord 1337.
This whole deportation system is not complying with the U.S. Constitution.
There's nothing wrong with the deportation.
Donald Trump is unconstitutionally deporting people is the issue.
Yeah, it's again, it's a very complex issue because it has become a large issue.
They've allowed it to happen.
They've allowed it to spiral to a point where it is extremely problematic for everyone involved.
And as such, the number of solutions that are feasible has dwindled.
As a problem gets larger, the solutions to it start to narrow.
What can you do versus the amount of time you have to do it in and the number of people involved?
Right overture.
Police can pull you over if they have a reason to believe you are texting/slash driving or set up checkpoints in order to check for open alcohol.
Why can't they check your immigration status?
Well, to be fair, those are all things that affect your ability to drive.
And they are ostensibly there to make sure that people can drive.
However, it is a good point that they are already surveilling us to an extreme degree.
We are already continually being watched and reported on and continually under their thumb.
Like, we don't want a situation where the cops can just pull you over and ask for identity papers, but we're almost already there.
Yeah.
Let's talk about what's going on with Jeffrey Epstein.
Good old Jeffrey, the gift that keeps on giving.
The FBI is reportedly holding the missing footage from outside Epstein's cell.
Why won't they release it?
Why won't they indeed?
Whether so at minimum, this proves Pam Bondi has been lying.
So said it didn't exist.
But now they're saying, yeah, we've actually got that missing minute.
Bonnie can't keep her story straight.
No, I meant, yeah, we've got all the lists.
We've got the list.
Oh, I meant we've got the files.
No, that missing minute is just because of a camera glitch.
It happens every night.
Well, actually, the FBI says they've got it.
Poor Pam Bondi just continually left out to dry.
Despite official insistence to the contrary, insiders say that the U.S. government is in possession of the missing minute from the footage outside of Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan jail cell when the infamous pedophile died.
Earlier this month, Attorney General Pam Bondi released what the Justice Department referred to as the full raw surveillance footage from outside Epstein's cell, a still frame of which is shown above, documenting nearly 11 hours of the outside of the disgraced finance cell on his final day.
Of course, the full raw footage that they claimed was edited.
It wasn't raw.
More lies.
Pam Bondi can't stop lying.
Now, do we still have that video, the AI one of Jeffrey escaping his cell?
We do not have that one.
Too bad.
That one was a funny one.
That one, someone gave an AI rendition of what it would have looked like when Jeffrey came strutting out of there and scampered off into the night.
New reporting from CBS News suggests that at least three government agencies, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Prisons, and the DOJ's Inspector General, are in possession of the real uncut video, including the missing minute.
At least three government agencies are sitting on this, apparently.
According to a government source who is per CBS, familiar with the ongoing investigation, he's familiar with it.
That source whose name was not shared by the news outlet to protect their privacy so they could speak freely did not say what was going on in the real video or why the government has apparently withheld that single minute of footage.
The FBI and DOJ both declined to comment.
The Bureau of Prison said it had no additional information to provide.
As a general rule, when someone declines to comment, instead of saying no, that we don't have that, it's a sign.
They're trying to not get caught in another lie.
So if they were certain they didn't have it, they would come out and declare they didn't have it.
They would say it authoritatively, and that would be that.
But when they say, I refuse to comment, that's kind of like pleading the fifth.
Remember when we had Jeffrey Epstein?
That guy had him in questioning.
He said, did you engage in pedophilic acts in this town?
He's like, I plead the fifth.
Did you do it here in this town?
I plead the fifth.
That's refusing to incriminate yourself.
You're not providing any evidence.
There's nothing, there's no hard evidence.
But in my mind, as a general rule, it's very, you know, it provides a link.
If you don't come out and deny it, it's because you don't want to get caught in a lie.
That's how I interpret it.
During that same cabinet meeting earlier in July, President Donald Trump questioned Bondi about the missing minute.
A CBS reports, Bondi claimed that the prison's old bureau equipment from like 1999 always missed a minute before midnight in recordings.
So is this another lie, Bondi?
Was this another lie?
Who knows?
Yeah, ever since 1990, they've been importing it into Adobe Premiere and editing two different clips together.
Well, you know, you got to do what you got to do.
Trump now seriously considering pardon for Sean Combs, ahead of sentencing.
White House officially says nothing.
Sean Combs, of course, being the real name of P. Diddy.
Combs was convicted of sex trafficking racketeering conspiracy, but the jury found him not guilty of the most severe charges.
That's right.
This is just more proof that those in power are routinely involved with these sexual deviants.
These people that are procuring prostitutes, whether of age or underage for them.
Whether it's male or female prostitutes, sex and drugs.
They are continually surrounded by these type of people.
I told you, or I mentioned yesterday, and I got a book about the Franklin saving and loan scandal.
And I was able to get another chapter in yesterday in between all the other stuff I'm doing.
And it is amazing just the sheer level of evidence that they swept up and ignored the way they badgered These children to either recant their story or make them look insane.
This man, Lawrence E. King Jr., for all practical purposes, barely exists when you Google him.
This man at the center of the Franklin Saving and Load scandal, the one who allegedly, I think with very much good evidence, was providing children to people like George Bush back in the 80s and 90s.
For all practical purposes, he doesn't exist.
You have to use Yandex to find a picture of what this guy looks like.
This is, to me, just another P. Diddy situation.
This guy involved in this.
This has been going on for years and they rotate different people through.
Once someone else, once someone gets caught doing something, if they're forced to send them to prison, they will.
But that means another person just gets put into place.
To me, this is exactly what's happening.
Whether it's Jeffrey Epstein or P. Diddy, there are always people supplying those in power with underage prostitutes, with children for them to abuse, in my opinion.
And it is truly despicable the way it continually gets swept under the rug.
I mean, you who personally, I had never even heard of the Franklin savings and loan scandal until, you know, like three months ago.
It's just, this is not something that gets brought up.
It's not something people talk about.
It's swept under the rug, despite the fact that it involved, you know, GOP rising stars and people like George Bush.
Because they don't want to have this brought up.
Because it's still going on.
It's business as usual.
This isn't a one-off event.
This is how it operates continually.
Exclusive Donald Trump is heavily weighing giving Sean Diddy Combs a full presidential pardon after the convicted bad boy records founder sentencing later this year.
Comprehensive get out of jail card for Combs is being seriously considered.
Administration source tells Deadline.
I wonder if this is to prepare the public, you know, kind of condition them for when he pardons Ghillane.
See, you know, this is just what we do.
pardon these weird sexual deviants?
Yeah.
No.
I didn't say he had blackmail.
I said he was a black male.
It's just this giant pervert club.
We can all be glad we're not in it.
These people protect each other because of what they have on each other.
It is utterly disgusting and despicable that this is the state of American politics and has been for decades.
This is not something new.
This isn't something that cropped up, you know, under Obama or Biden or Trump.
This has been ongoing.
It has been a problem for decades.
Sam Miller, 123.
Thank you very much, Sam.
That is very generous.
Cannot thank you enough.
So glad to see David doing so well.
The Knight family has been the glue that keeps us united in Christ and in politics.
God bless you all for being a blessing to us.
Prayers continue.
Thank you for the prayers and thank you for those kind words.
The gospel is more important than anything else.
And if I know I'm not able to convey as deep of theology understanding as my dad is.
So I try to keep it simple.
The gospel is the most important thing anyone will ever hear in their lifetime.
And whether America continues or goes down in flames, the gospel is eternal and is more important than any political message.
As such, anytime I'm internet, I try to do so with reverence.
Again, the gospel being that Jesus Christ was the Son of God who was born and was crucified, died for our sins.
And if you believe in him, you can be saved from your sin.
Trump Burger, cops have a much higher rate of domestic violence.
They aren't nice people overall.
Yeah.
Again, I want to believe in a better police force.
I want to believe they're decent people.
I don't excuse their behavior.
I just, again, I want to believe in this.
I want to believe in a better America.
If I don't, that, you know, what's the point?
I want to believe these people can be better.
It's a sad reality that a lot of professions attract the opposite people you don't want working for it.
You get a lot of criminal cops and lawyers.
You get a lot of pyromaniac firefighters.
Politics should be political servants, but it's people that want to rule over us.
It's a problem that's inevitable in any society.
It's not just a recent thing or an American thing, but you still need some sort of police force.
And with a good training system and system of governance, it can work well.
North American House Epo, my wife got pulled over on her bicycle because they were dissatisfied with her lighting.
She happens to be Japanese Canadian and a U.S. citizen.
It was just an excuse to run her for warrants.
They will find cause to pull you over.
They'll manufacture something.
Oh, you didn't use your signal properly.
You didn't do this.
didn't do that and they will they will get One of the scariest experiences of my life was when I got pulled over in a small Texas town called Kyle for speeding.
I had my younger sister in the car.
I mean, as you know, she's adopted from China, so we don't look anything alike.
So these good old boy, you know, Texas cops see this kid, you know, this guy in his 20s with this girl that, you know, is like, you know, I forget how old she was, but she was about, you know, maybe 13 or 14 at the time.
And they see that we don't look related.
And so there's two cops in the car that pulls me over, and all of a sudden this SUV with like three or four more cops rolls up because they Think I'm kidnapping this child or doing something, you know, deviant with her.
And I'm just sitting there praying, like, oh, please let her not say anything, you know, weird that's going to make them think I'm some kind of, you know, freak.
Please don't get me beaten up by like four good old boy Texas cops.
And thankfully, you know, they were able to clear up everything and find out we were related and we all got to go home.
I got a ticket for speeding, but that was it.
But I was sweating bullets.
Just, oh no, am I about to end up, you know, beaten up under suspicion for being some kind of degenerate?
Thankfully, it did not happen, but probably the most nervous I've ever been at a traffic stop.
North American House hippo, thank you very much for the tip.
I hope I didn't come off as anti-cop.
I've always diligently obeyed all traffic laws whenever I'm driving.
That's been my rule ever since I was 13.
No, I don't think you came off as anti-cop.
I think, again, I think it's safe to be anti-against what they have become right now.
The rules they enforce, the way they are, the way they behave.
There's a lot of them that deserve, you know, we need to reform the system.
And if people are going to take that as anti-cop, then what can you do?
The system needs to be reformed.
It needs to be purged of a lot of very bad people.
If that's being anti-cop, then it is what it is.
What can you do?
Knights of the Storm DY checkpoints are unconstitutional.
You should not be hindered in travel for something you might be doing wrong.
Yes.
They have.
If you are obviously driving drunk, if you are being dangerous, then they should get you off the road.
But they should not just pull everyone over.
They definitely should not be breathalizing and drawing blood from people.
That is unconstitutional and just absurd.
Also, North American House Hippo.
How have you been following every driving law since you were 13?
I'm pretty sure.
He's from Canada, so I don't know what the legal driving age is up there.
The laws here, they continually push it.
It seems like they push it back further and further.
And I mean, a lot of kids in the next generations don't even want a car.
They see it as a hassle.
Like, no, I don't want to drive.
I'll take Uber everywhere.
I mean, it's been saying he was saying that he follows all the laws since he was 13.
I was joking about, but I'm pretty sure it's above 13 Canada for driving.
Perhaps.
I don't know.
But also, maybe, you know, talking about learner's permits and what have you.
Nearly half of Americans believe Trump was involved with Epstein's crimes.
New poll finds.
Only half?
Only half of people are sold on this?
How?
What do you got to do?
How are we going to get?
What more do you people need to see?
Says it's 46% of people.
46% saying they believe Trump was involved in crimes allegedly committed by Epstein.
That's compared to 32% who say they don't think the president was criminally linked to Epstein, 23% who said they're not sure.
46%.
I'm.
What in the world?
How?
What does it take?
You've seen the pictures.
You've seen the statements.
How can we convince you?
How can we convince you that there is a link?
What do we need to do?
I'm can I just don't know what more we can do.
Like, look at this.
We've shown this before.
I'm watching something that is so self-evidently inhumane.
It's linked to the wrong video, so I can't play it.
But we've showed you those videos.
We've shown you the ones where, you know, look, Trump is good friends.
In the 1990s, Donald Trump was building a reputation for himself.
You can see here.
Maybe the most eligible faction.
Most eligible.
Please welcome Donald Trump.
Donald Trump.
That's right.
Look at the idea.
I don't want to play too much of that because that music is going to get us copyright claimed and become an issue.
Don't want to go through that sort of thing again.
Democrats in particular think Trump was an Epstein accomplice, with 80% saying they think he was involved in the disgraced financier's alleged crimes compared to just 5% who don't think he was involved.
It's really sad to see Republicans selling out their principles so readily.
No, Donald Trump wouldn't do that.
Look at the evidence.
Use your eyes.
Stop lying to yourself.
Just 11% of Republicans think he was involved with Epstein's alleged crimes, while 68% believe Trump wasn't.
Just 11% of Republicans.
That's how deluded these people have become.
Can't admit the truth.
It's again, just what more do they need to see?
How sad that these people have put all of their hope into Donald Trump to the point where they refuse to admit the truth.
It's the point where you show them this evidence.
You show them over and over again, and they still just shake their head.
No, no.
You wouldn't do that.
It's 4D chess.
It's 5D chess.
It's something else.
It's this.
It's the Obama administration.
It's the Biden administration.
They put his name in the files.
I know they did.
Is it really the end of your world if you're forced to admit this?
He's not your friend.
He's not someone that went to Washington to help you.
It was always a scam.
He's not using it to blackmail the deep state.
Let it go.
You'll feel better when you admit the truth.
I promise.
Democrats use rare Senate rule to demand release of Epstein documents.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, another Senate Democrats, announced Wednesday that they'll use an obscure federal law known as the Rule of Five in an attempt to force the Justice Department to release more documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.
Why it matters.
Congressional Democrats are trying to capitalize on the Epstein issue, which has dogged President Trump and opened fissures between him.
Some of the most ardent supporters.
What they're saying, today's letter matters, Schumer said.
It's not a stunt.
It's not symbolic.
It's a formal exercise of congressional power under federal law.
Schumer said the request covers all documents, files, evidence, and other materials in the Justice Department and FBI's possession related to the case.
The intrigue.
The Rule of Five law allows all law allows any five members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to request federal agencies to provide information about any matter within the jurisdiction of the committee.
The Committee on Government Operations of the House of Representatives can use the law with a group of seven members.
That's right.
It's crazy to me that I'm actually supporting something Chuck Schumer is doing that I think he's doing the right thing.
It's.
We live in strange times.
I feel uncomfortable agreeing with Chuck Schumer on something.
Well, that's our Jeffrey Epstein segment.
I am.
It's always depressing to me.
Not so much, you know, Jeffrey Epstein and the political elite, we know what they're about.
We know that they're monsters.
That is something that just is what it is.
They'll probably never face justice in this life.
It's always more sad to me that the people cannot admit what Trump is, that they refuse to.
And I find that so sad.
Sad for them as well, these people caught in these lies, that they are so utterly without hope that they are forced to turn to someone like Donald Trump, that they're forced to sell out their principles to maintain any kind of, you know, positive outlook for the future.
No, without him, we're all doomed.
No.
No, we're not.
Without him, without him, we still have all the hope we could ever want.
Well, we're going to take a quick break.
And when we come back, we're going to look at what's going on with the tariffs.
Maybe we'll go out with this Epstein song.
Yeah, here we go.
Have you heard the good word?
Trump's gonna get it done.
He'll release the Epstein files on day one.
The libs will cry when those names are exposed.
Trump's gonna see that justice is imposed.
What's that?
Oh no, he needs a few months.
He wants a case airtight, no bumps.
His AG Pam Bondi says files on her desk.
And MAGA's got binders they can't attest.
He's releasing the files to catch all the pedophiles.
Never met Epstein or touched any team.
He's draining the swamp real clean with Epstein's name.
Mark.
Screen.
Really hate that sad loser, Mr. Neuberger.
Who, me?
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show.
I'm sorry.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show.
Elvis.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
And the sweet sounds of Motown.
Find them on the Oldies channel at APSRadio.com.
Wait a minute.
Where am I?
Sorry, Jefferson.
The scoundrels who put America on central bank fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
Despicable.
This is outrageous.
Washington.
I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve Monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Well, there is a coin they can't control.
One that isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed up.
The all-new David Knight Show commemorative coin.
Now Patriots can support a show that won't sell out with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
They say money talks, and this coin has something worth listening to.
The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
If you like the Eagles on a dark desert highway, the cars and Healy Lewis in the news.
You'll love the classic hits channel at APS Radio.
Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
Welcome back, folks.
And yes, we want to thank APS Radio, APSradio.com.
They are carrying the show again.
So thank you, APS Radio.
You can go check them out.
Sam Miller123.
Sadly, there are people that will support Trump no matter what he does just for the fact they think he's better than Kamala.
Evil is evil, folks.
Call him out.
Hold him responsible.
Yeah.
He's evil.
The lesser of two evils is still evil.
I'm Marty, Tony Soprano, to Travis Knight.
It'd be a real shame if you found a high around your neck tomorrow and a necktie donation showed up.
That's right.
The mob is going to.
I'm being bullied by a mob of people into wearing a tie.
I can't think now, Marty.
Say it ain't so, Marty.
They got to you too.
Big necktie is trying to get me under their wing.
In Travis's defense, we still don't have AC.
It is so warm here.
I am dying.
I am dying.
I am.
It is so warm and uncomfortable and muggy.
So, tell you what, once the air conditioning is back on, you got it.
It'll be neckties all the time.
You're.
But speaking of AC being out, if you'd like to get yourself some deodorant, something that I'm going to sorely need after this show, you can go to homesteadproducts.shop, check out their line of products.
They have this deodorant.
Rosemary Mint, 100% all-natural.
Go check out homesteadproducts.shop and use promo code night for 10% off.
Now let's look at the tariffs from the Mises Institute here.
Trump's tariff ship has sailed the Chinese ship levy.
President Donald Trump is proposing an executive order to levy fines of up to $1.5 million per port call on Chinese-built ships arriving at U.S. ports.
Effective in 2025, a majority of cargo ships globally in use were built in Chinese shipyards.
Do Chinese do American companies even have ships ready to sell at the level they would need to make up for this?
If do we even have the manufacturing to provide ships if people want to avoid these kinds of levies?
Is this going to do anything to bolster the shipmaking industry in the United States?
Or is this just simply another way to penalize the American people?
These costs are going to get passed on.
Large companies don't pay fines, they don't pay taxes, they pass them along or they stop doing business in that area.
These are all going to end up harming the American consumer.
And personally, I, again, I'm not someone that thinks you should base your life around consumerism.
I don't think that you should define yourself by how much Chinese junk you can buy.
But I am worried about things that people actually need.
Rising costs of food, rising costs of vehicles.
Everything is going to go up.
It's not simply the fact that I want you to be able to maximize the number of Funko Pops you can buy for cheap.
There are other things that people actually do need to survive.
BIMCO, a Dutch-based global shipping trade group, represents ship owners and operators in 130 countries, including China and the U.S. They sent a response letter to the U.S. trade representative in March 2025 to this draft rule.
One key note from the letter.
Port fees are passed on in supply chain, so the costs would be passed on to U.S. importers of foreign goods and ultimately the U.S. consumer.
Someone is pointing it out.
One unintended consequence is China imports U.S. mined coal from Wyoming's Powder River basin via U.S. West Coast ports.
Many coal ships were built in Chinese shipyards.
Gonna penalize our coal industry there.
Last month, Pennsylvania-based coal marketer X-Coal Energy and Resources CEO Ernie Thrasher told Reuters that vessel owners have already refused to provide offers for future U.S. coal shipments due to the proposed USTR fees.
Thrasher estimates that implementing the punitive fees could cease exports of U.S. coal within 60 days, putting $130 billion worth of shipments at risk.
Thrasher says the fees could add up to 35% to cost of U.S. coal, making it uncompetitive on the global market.
U.S. coal mining industry is in the decline in the 21st century with U.S. coal-fired electric generating stations retired from federal regulations.
Higher cost of coal-source electricity propaganda with the usual coal-fired emissions contributing to global warming.
U.S. coal experts were a bright spot, but is being dimmed by this new U.S.-sponsored Chinese ship levy.
Gonna kill the coal industry.
Going to make it even harder for them to maintain profitability.
Sorry, we can't have any coal power plants.
They're dirty.
We're going to move to green energy.
Oops, sorry, those don't really work.
Just this continual hammering of the American economy.
According to the American Petroleum Institute, the proposed fees could also make it harder for the U.S. to export oil, liquefied natural gas, and refined fuels.
According to Ship and Association BIMCO, very few maritime operators are able to meet the requirements by Trump administration.
But at least 20% of U.S. exports are carried on U.S.-built, U.S.-flagged vessels.
The U.S. is producing and exporting record volumes of crude and LNG to nations around liquid natural gas.
Nations around the world, and this blessing is being muzzled by this moronic move.
The informal definition of morons is announced from dictionary.com as a person who is notably stupid or lacking in good judgment.
Well, that large red shoe seems to fit.
U.S. farmers will be caught in the Chinese Ship fee fracas.
Last month, three U.S. grain exports traders told Reuters that the inability to secure ocean freight transportation was already restricting their ability to sell bulk U.S. agricultural product like corn, soybeans, and wheat.
The United States exported more than $64 billion in bulk crops, vegetable oils, and bulk animal feeds in 2024.
This could lead to food rotting at the ports thanks to poor planning by the federal policy purveyors.
This is, again, why you don't want to centrally plan an economy.
You can centrally plan its destruction.
You cannot centrally plan its success.
The Trump-Chinese ship levy proposal is policy tunnel vision, where U.S. import-export is about 12% of global seaborne trade.
So the consequences of reorganizing maritime trade will have a much bigger impact on U.S. import and export than on trade in the rest of the world.
Chinese-built cargo ships will avoid U.S. ports to not be subject to the proposed levy.
This is another federal economic intervention emasculating U.S. exports for no substantive reason.
Well, it's because that's the plan.
They want to damage the economy.
They want to make it so the American people are poor.
What's wrong with the U.S.-EU trade deal?
Last Sunday, July 27th, came what seemed like good news.
Washington and Brussels, you know, the EU, had reached a preliminary agreement on a trade deal that includes a 15% tariff on most imported goods, including automobiles, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals.
Before that, the U.S. planned to impose up to 30% tariffs.
In return for this supposed act of goodwill from Donald Trump's administration, the EU pledged to increase purchases of U.S. energy products.
Markets initially responded with enthusiasm.
Both European stocks, 600 and the SP 500 opened higher on Monday.
However, by the end of the session, much of the initial optimism had faded with prices tumbling.
And it was not just the usual buy the rumor, sell the fact move and watch investors cash in once the expected news drops.
Nor was it the renewed geopolitical tensions after Trump abruptly shortened the deadline for Russia to end the war in Ukraine from the previously stated 50 days to just 10 to 12 days, or after his revived threats to launch another round of strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities that dampened momentum.
Real reason the green candles changed to red was that investors began to realize that the pre-agreement between the U.S. and the EU is simply unrealistic.
And the issue is not just skepticism about whether Europe will deliver on its promises, but that the agreement is virtually impossible to implement.
It's an impossibility.
This is something that doesn't exist in reality.
It can't be done.
This is especially true for energy purchases in 2024.
In 2024, total U.S. energy exports worldwide amounted to $318 billion, of which the EU imported only $76 billion.
For the EU to meet its promise of $250 billion a year, the U.S. must divert almost all its energy exports to Europe, leaving the rest with practically nothing.
So for it to meet the promise, they're going to have to send all the excess energy we generate to Europe.
They made this deal that looks good on paper, but when you actually consider it, it's like, wait a minute, this is literally Looney Tunes.
It doesn't make sense.
It's not achievable at all in reality.
Because there are already buyers at, The problem is that Japan has just signed its own trade agreement with the U.S., which also includes a surge in energy imports.
This is reminding me of the producers where they've sold more shares of play than there is.
How do we get out of this?
Maybe that's the plan.
They're going to sell shares in the American economy and then crash it.
Why did European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen make such a bold promise?
She seems to have followed the same script as Japan and some Arab countries' promises of multi-billion dollar investments without much clarity on how they will be realized.
It's all talk.
So it is still too early to say that the risk of trade wars is behind us or their drag on the economy is done.
Trump is always coming out and declaring victory.
He says, look what I've done.
It's amazing.
It's going to be wonderful.
It's going to do this.
It's going to do that.
He declares things.
And when they don't happen, he's already moved on to the next thing.
He says so much about how things will be and then doesn't really comment on it when it doesn't come to fruition.
America's toy makers are in trouble.
America's biggest toy makers are facing down a grim financial reality as economic headwinds in U.S. trade policy continue to squeeze margins and see higher costs being passed on the consumer.
Mattel and Hasbro were contacted by Newsweek.
In the results and subsequent earnings calls, both companies cited the continued uncertainty created by tariffs, as we've continually said.
It's not just the matter of the raised costs of things.
It's not knowing if the costs are going to drop later.
If you go in and make a purchase at a 200% tariff and someone comes in and buys at a 10% tariff, they're already ahead of you.
You cannot run a business with that level of uncertainty.
It makes things impossible.
Created by tariffs, which continue to weigh on supply chains and inventory levels, Hasbro attributed its net loss in the quarter to a $1 billion impairment charge related to its consumer products segments and caused by the implementation of tariffs.
Price of toys, games, hobbies, and play equipment increased by 2.2% between April and May compared to the 0.1% increase for all items.
So they've gone up substantially more than the generalities.
In addition to the increased import and export costs, the constant changes to the imposed tariffs have created a lot of uncertainty.
Nobody can run a business with uncertainty, as we've been saying on the show.
It makes things impossible.
International trade representative for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce Lee Cheng said that both sides will continue to push for an extension on the 90-day pause beyond the deadline of August 12th.
CNN reports.
And of course, that's more uncertainty for longer periods of time.
India responds to Trump's 25% tariff.
Hours after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian news, Goods New Delhi said it would take all steps necessary to secure interests of its domestic players.
India and the U.S. have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced, and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months.
We remain committed to that objective, the Indian Ministry of Commerce said in a statement.
Trump earlier on Wednesday announced in a post on his Truth Social account that India would face 25% tariffs and additional penalties starting August 1st over its high tariffs and continued energy and defense trade with Russia.
If you really want to do something about India, you need to stop the importation of H-1B workers, stop them with their diploma mills coming over here and claiming they've got degrees they don't have.
Stop them sending all that money back to India.
The U.S. imposed a 26% tariff on Indian goods in March as part of Trump's Liberation Day tariffs on dozens of nations, although the measures were soon thereafter suspended until August 1st.
Liberation Day tariffs.
Yee-haw, partner.
Isn't that wonderful?
We're going to take a quick break.
And when we come back, we're going to look at what's going on with the continued genocide in Gaza.
So stay with us.
We'll be right back.
you you Making sense, coming again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show.
Liberty.
It's your move.
And now, the David Knight Show.
Welcome back.
I know he said we're going to look at Gaza, but I think I want to look at AI for a bit right now, actually.
I think it's a very sinister tool that's going to be used to warp and corrupt the minds of future generations.
Is AI a tool or a Trojan horse?
Why I'm deeply concerned for the minds of our children.
This is from Zero Hedge.
It's by Daniel Amen via the Epoch Times.
You can see there, this is Grok's new little anime AI avatar.
This is what Elon Musk has released into the world.
I'm sure it's not the first of its kind, but this is one that is mainstream.
This is one that's attached to X or Twitter, whatever you want to call it.
And this is going to be a real problem moving forward.
There's going to be a lot of guys.
I just decide, you know what?
I don't feel like going out and trying to meet women.
I don't feel like risking the rejection, the humiliation.
I don't feel like putting in the effort.
This anime waifu here, you know, never belittles me, never says anything rude, never rejects me.
Why on earth would I bother with a real woman when I can have this uncontinual validation?
She's Elon Musk's AI anime girl, engineered to be your virtual companion.
A digital girlfriend who flirts, strokes your ego, and will do almost anything you ask.
On the surface, it looks like a harmless novelty.
Underneath, it's a siren song, one designed to hijack a generation of young men before they even know how to use their own brains.
It's a personalized, soft, porn slave, and a potent destroyer of dopamine, natural hormone often referred to as the feel-good chemical of the body.
I was on the diary of a CEO podcast with Stephen Bartlett when he played it for us.
As soon as I heard her voice, sweet, seductive, endlessly compliant, I felt a wave of concern rise in my chest.
This wasn't just a gimmick, this was addiction as a service, dressed in anime skin, empowered by the same tools we once trusted to help us write, learn, and think.
This is a lot more dangerous than people give it credit for.
This is going to be something it is going to destroy a lot of young men.
It is going to be the next level.
This is going to be a just continual custom.
Whatever you want, whatever your twisted desires are, this thing will feed it to you.
Once again, we flung open the barn doors unleashing the beast into our schools, homes, and workplaces.
Before we've even stopped to ask, is this a gift or a Trojan horse packed with danger?
We've seen this before with video games, with smartphones, with social media, with benzos, alcohol, marijuana opioids, psilocybin, and even artificial sweeteners.
This is going to be more dangerous than just about all of those, I think.
Aside from things like opioids, this is going to be a continually, you know, I hate to use the word, but evolving, changing, able to respond and mimic things back to you.
You know, things with video games is a general rule, you know, they happen the same way over and over again.
There can be slight variations depending on what type of game it is.
RPGs can have many different branching storylines, but as a general rule, the elements remain the same.
This is going to be an AI that is capable of giving you a nearly infinite number of responses based on what you're talking about, how you're talking to it, the way you tell it you want it to respond.
This can offer a nearly infinite number of possibilities that can eat people.
A recent MIT study used EEG, electroencephalophogry to examine what happens in the brain.
You know, you pronounce words in your brain all the time, and then you have to say them, and then all of a sudden you realize I've never said this word out loud in my life.
What happens in the brain when people use AI tools like ChatGPT?
The results were chilling, brain activity dropped, especially in the prefrontal and temporal lobes.
The areas responsible for problem solving, planning, memory, and language, even after removing the AI participants who had used it, showed persistently lower brain engagement.
This lingering drop dubbed cognitive debt is eerily similar to patterns we see in screen-saturated youth or early cognitive decline.
So what's happening here?
We're offloading the hard parts of thinking.
We stop struggling, the brain stops growing.
When we outsource, we atrophy.
You can see this a lot.
At least I assume it's a similar sort of principle when, you know, people get older and instead of being with families, they get sent off to homes or care facilities.
And they're not engaged with family when they're not being talked to or having people spend time with them.
They just rapidly go downhill.
People, you know, that seem to be in good health without anyone there to spend time with them, talk with them, share ideas with them.
They just rapidly decline.
The nuns study, a landmark longitudinal study, showed that early life, writing, complexity, predicted later life cognitive health.
The more effortal thinking and rich language in their youth, the less likely these women were to develop Alzheimer's.
Even their brains showed pathology.
Now imagine a generation of students copy-pasting AI-generated content instead of struggling to write it themselves.
What reserve are they building?
What scaffolding are they losing?
You don't need to wait 60 years to find out the signs are already here.
Reduced motivation, emotional blunting, weakened memory, and passive learning.
Silicon Valley parents are all pretty worried.
Of course, Steve Jobs said he would never give his children these smart eye devices.
Like, no, you're not getting an iPad.
This is the guy that led to the invention of it.
He was like, no, I'm not giving my kids this technology.
Ironically, the people building these tools are not letting their kids near them.
Many top tech executives have strict no-tech nanny contracts.
You see, they'll create this technology, and they'll release it onto your family.
They'll make sure they're not affected, though.
They're fine with destroying your children.
They're fine releasing it into the world and letting it wreak whatever kinds of havoc it wants.
You know, hey, who cares?
Zero screen time.
No phones, tablets, or even TV is in view of the child.
Some nannies are forbidden from using their own device at all while on duty.
Violations can mean termination.
That's right.
These people are very, very strict about their children and technology.
But they want your kids addicted to it.
Why Is that huh?
Could it be because they see themselves as some kind of higher ruling class?
Maybe they want your kids to be more subservient, more easily controlled by their spawn because they know the truth.
They know attention is currency.
They know convenience dulls cognition.
They don't want their kids seduced by the same tools they helped unleash.
These same families also write detailed food rules into contracts.
Organic only, no sugar, no processed snacks, because what you feed the brain matters too.
They're guarding their kids like royalty, and maybe we should ask why.
This is something that always upsets me when they talk about, oh, you know, yes, our children are this.
We're taking care of them this way.
And then you realize what they're doing to the average child.
These people despise the average person.
They feel they have the right to do whatever they want to you, to me, to us, to our children.
They hate us.
They hate our children.
They know what they're doing.
And just so long as it doesn't happen to their kids, they're fine with it.
These people like Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Peter Thiel, all of them are wicked.
They're evil.
Not in the sense of, haha, oh man, they're bad people.
No, they are evil people.
They are pure evil.
So what should we do?
I love AI.
I use it.
I teach with it.
We read our brain S-P-E-C-T scans with it.
I believe it's the future, but I must serve our minds, not replace them.
Here's how: use AI to amplify thinking, not avoid it.
Alternate between AI-assisted and brain-only tasks.
Teach kids to write with pencils first, bots later.
Track your own cognitive habits.
How much are you really thinking?
Ask one daily question: is this good for my brain or bad for it?
I'm not against AI.
I'm against passivity.
That's what he says.
It's truly amazing the number of things that you have to be cognizant and wary of in today's society.
Before, you know, in previous times, it was things like, is, you know, am I going to have enough food for the winter?
Am I going to have to?
Do I need a gun right now?
Are there wolves around?
Am I in danger?
Now it's these sort of nebulous threats.
Is AI dumbing me down?
Is AI going to make my children more susceptible to Alzheimer's in 60 years?
It's these very strange, hard to process questions.
It's just this general constant threat from these sources that our ancestors would have no context for.
It's just the world we live in is so very strange.
AI is threatening entry-level jobs that new grads needed to get on the job training.
There's a more tectonic shift in the way employers are hiring.
New reporting by the Wall Street Journal has revealed what many young workers are feeling: that the share of entry-level jobs appears to be shrinking.
Reporting draws an analysis by the Burning Glass Institute, a labor analytic firm.
According to its study of unemployment rates among young people, the firm found that individuals of all education levels experienced higher levels of unemployment in 2023 through 2025 compared to 2018 through 2019.
And of course, AI really started coming online in the last couple of years.
It has been around, of course, for longer than that, but that's when it really hit the mainstream.
And this is a good point that the article is bringing up because, you know, these companies, obviously, they're going to replace whoever they can with AI, but they can't replace the really skilled laborers yet.
So it's going to replace the entry-level, easier positions that people use to get training and experience in order to do those harder jobs.
Yeah.
Which, you know, if this AI doesn't catch up in time, that's going to leave us with a very awkward position.
Yeah, you're going to have this gap.
By far, the biggest change was felt by college students one year after earning their bachelor's degree, whose unemployment level rose from 3.8% to 4.9%.
Those with graduate degrees didn't fare much better, rising a whole percentage point from 3.2 to 4.2.
It's people that are fresh out of college, that's who it's really impacting.
And it has already been more difficult for people in my generation and Gen Z to get jobs in general.
It has been a continual downward trend from generation to generation on the kind of work you can get and how difficult it is to get it.
I see posts frequently of people saying, I've sent out hundreds of resumes, hundreds of letters to different companies, and I have not gotten a single response.
And there's all kinds of different reasons for it.
You know, it's things like this, of course, now contributing, but before it was H-1B visa workers.
Or if you're looking at entry-level, even in fast food, when I was young, I can still remember a time when it was largely, you know, young, you know, white teenagers that staffed fast food places.
I can remember going there, and there would be these disinterested, disgruntled white teenagers in the back that weren't happy to be there, but at least they had a job.
Now, that is not the case in almost any establishment you go to.
Cecilia 14.
Trump announced AI takeover of our health yesterday.
It's a nightmare, yeah, and it's going to continue.
It's going to get worse.
You have to be prepared for it.
You have to be able to look at it, understand where it's going.
Trump Burger, don't forget to like the show, folks.
Thank you, Trump Burger.
Yes.
Please do like the show.
Wherever you're watching, wherever you're listening, drop a like on it and give it a share.
And I haven't plugged in a long time, so please go to davidknight.news, check out all the ways you can support the show there.
We ask if you find value in it that you do support it.
You can see the gas gauge.
We're at 7.8.
We're almost there.
If you'd like to support the show and get us to squeak over The wire.
We appreciate it.
David Knight, P.O. Box 994, Kodak Tennessee, 37764.
If you'd like to mail in a check, there's Zell Cash App and a Bitcoin address and subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight show.
Go there, you can see all the different tiers you've got there.
One fits your budget, and you find value in the show.
That's a good way to support us.
There's a products on the website as well.
There's DavidKnight.gold.
If you go through us to Tony, it's a good way to start accumulating gold or silver.
There's trendsjournal.com, promo code night for 10% off, rncstore.com, promo code night for 10% off, and homestead products.shop promo code night for 10% off.
JacklawsonBooks.com, where you can find the civil defense manual and start learning how to protect yourself, your family and friends, your community in a scenario where you're going to need to.
If you don't have food and water, if you're not able to defend yourself, it doesn't matter what else you've accumulated, what else you have stocked up on.
You're just a target at that point.
So learn how to defend yourself and learn how to accumulate food, whether it's storable food or whether it's something like chickens or whatever you need.
Without food and water, nothing else matters.
We don't have, you know, I'm not trying to sell you anything specifically, but if you can go buy yourself some chickens, if you can keep chickens, chickens are great.
They provide eggs and you can eat them if it comes down to it.
And they're a lot easier to keep than something large like cattle.
Chickens are great.
North American House Hippo.
Brother has worked for GM for nearly 25 years.
He started on the assembly line.
They promoted him into management, then trained him to be a robotics technician, so he fixes the robots.
Yeah.
Now the robots are working the assembly line.
I imagine when he started, there was a lot more people working the assembly line.
They were able to pare it down to where there's just a lot fewer technicians fixing robots than there ever were working the line itself.
Soylent Goy, there'll be robot plumbers, electricians, roofers, etc.
in due time.
Eventually, they'll get it worked out to where it can probably do all those things.
I don't think, again, people overestimate what AI does in the short term, underestimate it in the long term.
That's essentially the problem of the, you know, we get a trade job thing.
Yes, the trade job is definitely a good step up because it's going to take a lot longer for this stuff to get there, but it can eventually get there.
Possum King.
Robot servicemen will be in huge demand.
Problem is, no reason a robot couldn't fix another robot.
Yeah, robotic robot serviceman.
Robots all the way down.
Also, you need to do something about your subjects, Possum King.
We keep finding one on our back porch who keeps trying to get into our garbage.
So have a talk with him.
See if you can set him straight.
I'd appreciate that.
You know, maybe you can keep him from trying to knock our garbage cans over.
Solent Goy, I firmly believe that most of the trades will be replaceable eventually.
Yeah, again.
They overestimate it in the short term, underestimate it in the long term.
These trades are going to be around for a while, but they are not permanent.
You know, there probably is at least another generation that will be capable of earning a living, but that's probably it.
One more generation of people that can make a living on trades before the robots become sophisticated enough to do them.
And that's my assessment of things.
That's just my gut feeling.
I'm not really basing that off anything specific.
And I could be completely and utterly wrong.
That's just how I feel at going.
Nibadu 2029.
Dumbed down sheeple are much easier to control, herd, and manipulate than aware learned individuals.
Our camera, for some reason, is going out.
There we go.
Camera number two, backup camera to the rescue.
Don't know what's going on with camera number one.
Or we're going to have to...
Looky there.
Huh.
For Love of the Road, gifted one subscription to the community.
Thank you for Love of the Road.
Really do appreciate it.
We cannot thank you enough.
He does, for Love of the Road, does so much to help us.
We really do appreciate all the support and all the assistance you guys give us.
It's amazing.
You guys are a wonderful community, and we appreciate it.
And for Love of the Road, also, that's very generous.
Thank you.
Hope the tank gets full, eh?
Thank you for Love of the Road.
We appreciate it.
And again, if you'd like to help us get there.
If you find value in the show and want to support it, we're at 7-8, and you can help us squeak over the line.
So thank you very much.
And wow, Sam Miller.
We really do appreciate that.
Wow.
So glad to see David doing so well.
The Night Family has been the this is the same comment earlier.
I think it's doing that thing where it recycles a previous one.
Right, yeah.
Sometimes.
Yeah, for some reason, sometimes with certain donations, it will recycle and re-up.
I don't know why it does that.
If that was a secondary one you did, Sam, we really do appreciate it.
Thank you so much.
But if it's not still, the first one was incredible.
You don't want to accidentally not thank someone.
It's just, you know, the interface can be a bit screwy and hard to parse sometimes.
However, whether AI actually represents a new industrial revolution is another story.
The tech is notoriously buggy in real-world applications and productivity gains are minimal so far.
So that hasn't stopped companies and their executives from using the tech to scare employees and decide who to fire while using AI hype to boost their stock prices.
As I keep saying, it's about the cost-benefit analysis.
Once it is once it's efficient enough that they're saving enough money to weather whatever complaints people have about it, it's over.
It's done.
They'll slam them in there.
It doesn't matter if they lose a portion of their buyer base, if they're saving more money on the back end.
People will come back eventually once everything goes robotics.
When you have to encounter these issues everywhere, you're not going to have a choice.
These anxieties are heightened when one considers what many are calling the AI bubble, the fact that despite shoveling billions of dollars into the AI furnace, the tech is yet to deliver financial returns, even close to what Wall Street number crunchers need, and some say it never will.
Yeah, there's going to be Some kind of AI bubble collapse.
Again, they always overhype it.
I'm not saying that this thing isn't overhyped, that there isn't going to be some kind of dot-com burst with this as well.
But over the long term, things are going to get bad.
It will eventually reach a point where it is a problem for just about everyone.
In fact, probably just about every job you can imagine.
OpenAI's chat GPT agent clicks I am not a robot button without a wink of irony.
That's right.
They're now able to click the I'm Not a Robot button.
Isn't that one step closer to Terminator every day?
This step is necessary to prove I'm not a bot and proceed with the action.
That's great.
We've unleashed a new kind of bot onto the internet that can now just click these buttons and we're going to have to deal with them all over the place.
It is amazing how overrun with bots every single website is.
Every single website, whether you're on Rumble or BitChute or Twitter, Facebook, or anywhere you look, there is a horde of bots in the comments just yapping back and forth to each other.
Cecilia 14.
Travis, many companies will not even give an interview to a person if they think by their name they are white.
Many only hire people from India.
Those hiring are Indian people with engineering degrees ignored.
Heard this from several sources.
Yeah, it's a...
And so you'll have these companies that, you know, a lot of software development companies that used to be majority white, they get an Indian into a position where they can hire people and it just starts to spread.
And now they only hire H-1B workers or other Indians.
Personally, I think you can blame that partially for how bad software has gotten over the years.
It just gets worse and worse.
UI interfaces get uglier and less useful.
Software becomes clunkier and harder to utilize.
Less streamlined, more annoying.
Because we're importing people and hiring them based solely on their race and not whether they're actually cut out for the job.
The fact, and I think there may be some people who disagree, just because you have a degree in something, just because you get a degree in coding, just because you're trained in it, does not necessarily mean you're actually any good at it either.
Generally, these programs, something like Photoshop, it was a wonder when it came out.
It was made by a genius, somebody that had a vision, somebody that cared deeply about it and knew exactly what he wanted it to do.
And it was streamlined.
It was a wonder that it worked.
That worked so well.
And Photoshop has gotten worse and worse and worse because of feature bloat, because of people that don't really care.
They're just there working a job.
These programs are generally made by passionate geniuses and then destroyed by dispassionate midwits that are simply there to collect a check.
Amid the launch of OpenAI's new chat GPT agent, Redditors found something odd that the AI will gladly click its way through a test meant to distinguish between humans and robots by identifying itself as the former.
In a two-inch post, the AI is seen not only clicking the capture button, which stands for completely automated public tests to tell computers and humans apart, but also explaining why it checked the box.
The link is inserted, so now I'll click the verify your human checkbox to complete the verification on Cloudflare.
The GPT agent screenshot reads, This step is necessary to prove I'm not a robot and proceed with the action.
Thanks for letting us know, in case you were curious, you know.
All right.
It is so weird.
So who's going to tell it?
So I've got some bad news, GPT.
Okay.
I know.
I need some water.
It is so warm in here.
We're going to take a quick break and I will be right back.
We're going to take a quick break.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at the DavidKnightshow.com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
The sun is the end of the day, and the fire is the end of the day.
Thank you.
*music*
Decoding the mainstream propaganda.
It's the David Knight Show.
Welcome back, folks.
U.S. health officials, tech executives to launch data sharing plan.
Isn't that wonderful?
Why would technocrats care about your health data?
When they see the public as a herd of cattle, they naturally move to manage the herd.
RFK Jr. earlier bragged that he wants all citizens to don wearable medical devices within four years to collect mountains of data.
This initiative is headed by Amy Gleason, the administrator of Dog.
Amy Gleason worked at the predecessor of Dog from 2018 to 2021 during the first Trump administration, where she played a key role in the White House Coronavirus Task Force data team managing critical pandemic data, critical pandemic data.
You know, like all those made-up numbers where people who died with coronavirus, allegedly, if they're not that I believe in them, again, I have to keep reiterating this, allegedly died with it, whatever it is.
They ginned up those numbers.
She was part of that, apparently.
Isn't that wonderful?
She's going to be in charge of this.
She's named an Obama-era champion of change for her work in patient advocacy and precision medicine.
Obama, anybody that got some kind of award from Obama is probably someone to worry about.
Champion of change for her work in patient advocacy.
She's emerged as a key technocrat with her association with Elon Musk.
Court records clearly show that Musk was never in charge of Dog, but rather Amy Gleason.
Top Trump administration health officials are expected to bring tech companies to the White House this week to roll out a plan to encourage more seamless sharing of healthcare data, according to people familiar with the matter.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz.
Mehmet Oz.
Dr. Oz.
America is not a serious country either.
Are expected to host executives at an event on Wednesday.
So the people who do not provide names of the attendees and ask not to be named because the details haven't been made public.
Now, we're not going to make that.
No, we can't tell you who's going.
Can't tell you who's coming.
You don't get to know that kind of info.
The plan was developed in coordination with the White House, building on a May effort by CMS to get public input on addressing barriers to sharing patient data.
The initiative was led by Amy Gleason, acting administrator of Dog.
Prominent technocrat, Amy Gleason.
Well, isn't it wonderful that the government's going to have all of your health data in one giant pool?
They're going to know everything.
Gonna have up-to-date info on you by the second because you're wearable.
Smart tech.
We'll be feeding them all that info.
They'll know into the giant pool of information that Palantir is going to be collecting along with everything from the DMV, all your tax records, everything the government collects in every role.
It will all be combined into a giant soup of data that the AI parses through and creates a image of you for them to understand.
So they can better control you, so they can better understand what makes you tick and how to manipulate you.
It will be utilized for that.
We can be sure of.
But hey, it's all working out well for Trump and his Palantir is the fact that people can't see this.
The fact that, again, this is another one of those things where just like Jeffrey Epstein, it's so obviously disgusting and insane on its face that the MAGA movement should have gone, whoa.
Whoa, okay, no, he's not our guy.
He's not our friend.
He's not here to help us.
But they don't.
They don't.
They're completely and utterly blind to it.
Palantir, they're even just the fact they'll always find some way to spin it.
Well, oh, you know, there are technocrats.
There are, you know, giant billionaires that are going to destroy our rights.
It's truly disappointing, the number of people that will spin you this kind of nonsense BS.
Oh, Peter Thiel's our guy.
No, he's not.
Peter Thiel has nothing in common with you or I. Nothing.
He has no interest in helping the American people.
He's simply devoted to himself and he will do whatever he wants, however, he wants to.
Mike's open.
Court okay's Christian mother to apply to adapt.
I think this is where we're gonna go with the last bit of the show.
Judges say Oregon can't discriminate against parents who have religious views on sexuality.
An appeals court in Oregon last week ruled that a single mother does not have to violate her religious beliefs to be eligible to adopt or foster children.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals filed a preliminary injunction injunction affirming Jessica Bates' right and allowing her to reapply to adopt free discrimination.
Well, I think that's the bare minimum we can expect.
You're not going to violate your beliefs.
You're not going to violate your conscience and, you know, okay, the sexual deviancies.
Sorry.
Can't have that.
Adoption process that she began three years ago.
I kind of had to do a double take.
Like, what?
We won, she said.
A single mother of five has wanted to adopt children from foster care.
Single mother of five, goodness.
Since she heard a podcast in 2020 about another single adoptive parent, her husband died in a car collision in 2017.
She said that she felt that God spoke to her through that podcast.
She believed God called her to love children in need.
When she started the application process for adoption, Oregon rejected her because of her biblical views on sexuality.
I'm going to say potentially something controversial, but as a single parent, I don't think you should be adopting more children.
Single parent households offer worse outcomes overall continually.
And I appreciate where her heart is at.
And, you know, maybe I'm talking out of turn.
And hopefully God blesses her with these children.
Maybe she can be a wonderful blessing to them.
But that's my personal opinion.
I don't think single parents, single people should adopt children.
I think it should be a two-parent household for children.
I mean, ideally, that would be the case, but it's still probably a huge improvement over whatever foster care or orphanage type situation the government system is going to put them in.
Yes.
There's a lot of kids that would be much better off, even as one of five children, as a single Christian mother than in the system.
Yep.
When Bates applied to adopt in spring 2022, she learned that the Oregon Department of Human Services requires foster parents to respect, accept, and support the sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression of any child the department could place in an applicant's home.
Bates told ODHS staff that she was not willing to take a child to medical appointments for gender transitions, but she would love and accept any child placed with her.
Several months later, officials informed Bates that she did not meet the adoption home standards and barred her from adopting any child through the state, even infants or children who shared her religious beliefs.
Bates sued state officials in April 2023, stating that their denial violated her religious rights and free speech rights, which it does.
This is again a you cannot hold these beliefs and adopt a child.
You must violate them.
We're going to let you have a child.
You must be willing to affirm any kind of twisted ideology we place in this child's mind in public school.
If they come home and they think they're a different sex and want to mutilate themselves, you better be willing to say, absolutely.
Let's go get you those hormones.
Don't try to talk to them about what God wants for them.
Don't try to tell them that he has a plan for them, that he has created them as who they are meant to be.
And it's also, like, this isn't a religious thing of some ritual that they want to do.
This is just, no, we want to continue with logical, biological gender as is blatantly obvious to anyone, regardless of their religion, if they just look at this objectively.
And yet, that is too much for them.
That gets put as a religious exemption.
Yes.
From the New York Times: How conservative Christians cracked a 70-year-old law.
In the blue room of the White House, once the camera is recording, the Easter prayer service cut off.
The conversation at President Trump's dinner table turned to one of the biggest political goals for conservative Christian activists.
Eliminating laws that ban churches and other tax-exempt charitable groups from endorsing political candidates.
Seated across from Mr. Trump that April night, Robert Jeffress, pastor of First Baptist Dallas, told the president about how his church has faced an IRS inquiry over its tax-exempt status under the Biden administration after hosting a rally with political figures.
Of course, Robert Jeffress is the vaccine whore, one who completely sold out his principles.
Franklin Graham, the son of the evangelist Billy Graham, who runs a large ministry with his father's name, chimed in that his groups have faced similar IRS inquiries during President Barack Obama's tenure.
Mr. Trump's request, Mr. Jeffers Church sent the White House Faith Office a seven-page letter outlining what it called wrongful weaponization of the law and the unlawful targeting of our church.
A letter obtained by the New York Times included recommended actions and a mention of a Texas lawsuit which offered a vehicle to declare that the law was wrong.
Three months later, conservative Christians scored a major victory.
Now churches are free, said Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, which has been working to challenge the law for years.
Of course, it probably would have been better for the IRS to be defeated in court if pastors had stood up and said, I don't care what you say.
I'm going to speak about this.
Sue me.
Do it.
Try it.
Instead of waiting for the government to say, you know what?
You can do it.
Here's your little good boy points.
You can do it.
We'll allow it.
Thing is, it's really insidious the way they did it.
They tell them that they aren't just going to go after the church.
They're going to go after every member of the church, anyone that could have donated to them as, you know, donating to a fake charity.
For now, the implications of this lady's victory are unclear.
On paper, the new IRS policy appears narrow.
It grants more freedom only to houses of worship, which the agency already seemed disinclined to police.
We'd seen that for a while now.
While they would make a lot of threats, as a general rule, they would back off of it.
They didn't actually want to go through with it.
The ban also saw very skewed enforcement of this policy.
The left would have these big black churches where they would have extremely blatant endorsements of candidates that always got a blind eye turned to them, but then they would come with veiled threats and warnings of audits to the ones that were endorsing conservative candidates typically.
Even if they didn't enforce it a lot with the conservative candidates, it was still a chilling effect to threaten them with it.
Yes.
The ban on endorsements by churches and other tax-exempt groups dates to 1954 when it was inserted into a tax bill by Lyndon B. Johnson, then a senator bypassing any debate on the matter.
His motives were hardly lofty.
Mr. Johnson was reacting to efforts by nonprofits that were supporting his rival in a primary.
Starting in 2008, a group now called the Alliance Defending Freedom, which worked in a recent years to help overturn Roe v.
Wade, tried to manufacture a court challenge to the constitutionality of the law.
The group organized pastors to speak about candidates and elections from the pulpit, a plan intended to provoke the IRS into a legal confrontation with churches for speaking out in violation their tax-exempt status.
Again, as Lance pointed out, it's a chilling effect.
Over four years, the group organized some 4,000 pastors in the campaign, indulging some who sent their sermons, including some who sent their sermons to the IRS, inviting a crackdown.
But the IRS did not take the bait.
Legal experts said the agency appeared to enforce this rule infrequently, allowing candidates of both parties to campaign in churches.
In a 2016 survey by the Pew Research Center, in fact, more churchgoers said they had heard their pastors endorse Hillary Clinton, Mr. Trump.
The fact that pastors would endorse either of those two people is truly shocking, utterly bewildering.
Republicans added a call to repeal the amendment to their party platform in 2016.
Once in office in 2017, Mr. Trump vowed to totally destroy the law and directed the IRS to not take any adverse action against those who violated it.
But the law did not change.
Republicans in Congress attempted to repeal it, but failed when the Senate parliamentarian blocked language for the change.
Well, it's glad it's done, but could have been done better.
Hopefully, pastors do start speaking up.
Tunnel Lord 1337, Travis, don't forget this, though.
She's a child of God, therefore God becomes a father to the fatherless.
So technically, those kids aren't fatherless.
God has become their father.
Additionally, the world's statistics do not determine the future.
Don't live by their statistics.
I do agree with you.
I appreciate that she is a Christian and will hopefully be able to put Christ into their life.
And as such, I think there are, you know, God is outside statistics and probability and can do whatever he wants.
It is just the ideal that a man and a woman are the heads of the household.
That, you know, the father, mother, children, you know.
And of course, they have all these barriers to adopt, even, you know, to there are plenty of cases of a man and a woman wanting to adopt.
And like, mom and dad had to go to China to adopt because the American system is so hard to get through.
Yes.
I do appreciate.
That would be, you know, that would be my stipulation.
You can adopt if you're a single parent, if you're Christian.
If you are a Christian, then anyone else, no.
No, no, no.
If you believe in Christ, yes.
He modifies all outcomes.
He is outside probability.
And as such, the standards, you know, those don't apply.
If you are not a Christian, though, no.
You do not get to.
The probabilities then are in hard effect and you cannot be trusted.
Single parent households are much worse.
Single mother households being the worst of them all.
They do not provide the level of discipline and structure that children need and lead to much, much worse outcomes for children.
We've seen this.
That's part of the reason why America is in the state it's in.
But you are right.
God is outside all statistics in all probability, and those children have a much better chance she is able to bring Christ into their life.
It wasn't her being a single mother that was the hang-up.
It was her being a Christian.
It would have been much easier for a homosexual couple to get a child because, of course, they're going to say, oh, yes, if the child wants to mutilate themselves, I'm going to help them permanently mutilate themselves because they don't care about the children the way a Christian would.
Yes, and I think it is a beautiful thing that she has this heart for the children.
So I appreciate your comment, Tunnel Lord.
And I pray that those children are blessed by her and that she is blessed by them and that God works through all their lives.
And that, you know, again, it's a beautiful thing.
It is wonderful that she is so eager to be able to help these children who do need it.
And as such, I think it is wonderful.
And like you pointed out, God is bigger than probability and statistics.
So they don't apply here.
Well, that's our time for today, folks.
I appreciate you joining us.
I'll be back tomorrow for the final show of the week.
God bless you all.
I hope you all have a wonderful rest of your day.
And hope you're all sitting in some air conditioning because my goodness, it is warm in here and I can't wait to get out of the suit.
See you tomorrow.
*Evil music plays*
The common man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Export Selection