All Episodes
July 21, 2025 - The David Knight Show
03:01:16
Mon Episode #2058: PREP Act Exposed: Legal Immunity for Vaccine Crimes
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it is Monday, the 21st of July, year of our Lord 2025.
Gavin Newsom was asked about his draconian COVID policies, and he says, well, no one knew any better.
I guess all you in the audience just got lucky, huh?
And Colbert is getting canceled.
That's right, it's time to say good night to the late show.
We're putting it to bed.
Podcasts are still growing, though.
And of course, lawsuits are flying back and forth between Trump and the Wall Street Journal.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
Welcome to the show, everyone.
Hope you had an excellent weekend are having a good morning so far.
As I said, we're going to take a look at what's going on with COVID.
And Gavin Newsom, of course, saying, you know, nobody knew.
We didn't know any better.
How could anyone have known?
I mean, you could have looked at the evidence, and of course, saying he didn't know is a complete lie.
He knew what he was doing.
He did it on purpose.
That was the entire point of it, to lock everyone down, to crush the economy.
To put people in hospitals, keep them away from their families, to ventilate them, to give them remdesivir, to make a ton of money for pharmaceutical companies while killing a lot of people.
But we're going to start today with an email from Handy, which is very sad.
He has kept us updated on a lot of things, and you can go to his Substack to read this for yourself.
It's I Handy on Substack if memory serves.
The title is Another Victim.
We'll start with this.
It says, I have another pneumonia vaccine injury to report.
Today we were dispatched to a sick person call.
When we arrived, we found a bedbound female in her late 60s who had an unrelated left arm complaint.
Today's medical problem isn't what I'm writing about.
While obtaining her medical history, I asked her why she's bedbound.
She told me it was the pneumonia vaccine.
She says she actually had pneumonia two weeks prior to receiving the vaccine.
I asked her why she would take a vaccine for an illness she had just gotten over.
She told me that the facility where she gets dialysis was adamant that she should get the pneumonia vaccine even after just having pneumonia.
You gotta get it.
I know you just had the disease or sickness, whatever, but you gotta get it anyway.
You should do that.
It doesn't matter that it's going to be useless to you.
It doesn't matter that it's not gonna have any effect.
Even and I'm saying from their own perspective on things, from their own way they view the science.
The vaccine is gonna do you any good after you've just had it.
Your body's already producing antibodies.
But get that vaccine anyway.
She says the facility didn't physically force her to take the vaccine, but they strongly encouraged her to take the pneumonia vaccine anyways.
She said not long after the vaccine she fell and broke her pelvis and shoulder.
She said she knew immediately that it was Guillain Beret, and that it progressed rapidly until she was paralyzed from below her diaphragm down.
Go get this vaccine.
It's not gonna do any good for you.
It's completely worthless even by our own standard at this point, but go ahead and get it.
It'll make us feel better.
It'll make our wallets feel a lot better.
Don't you know that, you know, Moderna or Pfizer or Eli Lily, Gilead, don't you know that they need your money?
They need to be even more profitable every single year.
It's been a year now and she hasn't improved.
I'd like to remind you that I had a co-worker whose mother lost her life to Guillain Beret after taking one of the COVID jabs.
The substack post is titled Another Victim.
And again, that's from Handy, and you can find it on his substack.
He's done a lot to catalog the vaccine injuries he's seen over COVID, the insanity that he witnessed.
Handy's done an excellent job with that.
Of course, Handy is a first responder, so he deals with a lot of that sort of thing, people who are having all kinds of issues.
But I wanted to read that first because it illustrates just how absurd their position is.
Just yeah, I know you had the disease.
I know your body's already manufacturing the antibodies.
I know the vaccine, by our own logic and standard, is worthless to you.
It's not going to do you any good.
But go ahead and get that injection anyway.
It'll make us here at the clinic feel better.
First, do no harm is out the window.
It's been out the window for years upon years, really, but with COVID, they were able to go fully mask off with it.
It doesn't matter anymore to them.
It's all about getting you to take vaccines.
It makes them a lot of money.
And of course, I've detailed to you, and many people have said this before, just how adamant they are about getting everyone that comes into a clinic vaccinated.
Because, well, you know, if you don't have a certain percentage of your, you know, base that come in and get treatment there vaccinated, it's possible, and very likely, the insurance companies aren't going to pay out to you anymore.
You're not going to get that kickback.
They'll stop paying.
Be my Valentine, they are killing our seniors with the senior vaccine schedule.
Yeah.
Doing everything they can to get rid of people.
They really love injecting the very young and the very old.
Do not obey.
Drug dealers want you to take their supply.
They show defensiveness.
Yeah, they get defensive when you ask questions.
Bulldog.
The doctors put a hard cell on you make you feel like a lemming.
Yeah.
Bulldog.
Do like I do.
Get new doctors.
That's right.
If they keep pushing and keep trying to pressure you into getting the vaccine, go somewhere else.
Of course, that's...
Some people.
There's not a lot of options to choose from in certain places.
These people may be your only choice if you absolutely have to go to the doctor.
I told you I'm very thankful that the pediatrician we take our son to, while they offer vaccines, they don't pressure you on them.
They've asked, and we said no.
They said, well, all right.
And that was it.
Ideally, they wouldn't even ask you about them, but what can you do?
That's the best we have access to, and I'm still very thankful that they aren't constantly trying to sell us, trying to make us feel like bad parents for not taking the vaccine.
I also want to let you know that we do have an update from my dad.
We recorded it yesterday, so I'll be playing that for you.
That's right.
The first video of David Knight back in studio.
And you'll be getting to see that today.
That'll be coming up shortly.
I want to make sure that I play it for you all.
But I'm going to talk about Gavin Newsom for a bit first.
But yes.
David Knight back in studio for the first time.
It'll be your.
That's the preamble to him coming back.
California Governor Gavin Newsom on his draconian COVID mandates.
None of us knew.
It's just...
Who knew?
Who was to say, really?
What a liar.
I was implementing all of these draconian things that gave me all this kinds of power that I've wanted for years entirely good-naturedly.
Exactly.
It was just a happy little accident.
I mean, maybe not happy, but you know, just lying through his teeth as he realizes how unpopular everything is.
If a couple of years ago, he would have just been saying, yeah, this was for everyone's good.
It's a pop, you just needed to do it.
We reached a point where he's kind of having to walk back that kind of rhetoric.
He's not able to just go, yeah, it's for the greater good.
Shut up.
It was important.
He has to be a little chagrined and be like, ha ha, ah, shucks.
Aw, shucks.
You know, who could have known?
None of us knew.
He's not able to just tell you to shut up.
This is for the greater good.
Even the California governor, good old Mr. Newsom.
Mike's open.
And of course, it's because of people like you in the audience, people like you who pointed out over and over again to your friends and to your family how absurd this all was.
It can seem like it's a losing battle.
Like people aren't learning.
But if they hadn't, Newsom wouldn't have to come out and play his little aw shucks song and dance.
It's true, it is a sign of good things that it's gone from, if you don't follow every rule, you are literally killing grandma to, oh, well, we didn't know.
Nobody knew.
How could I have known?
It's funny that you think I knew.
So keep doing it.
Keep letting people know.
It can be depressing and even make you angry having to speak to some of these people and they'll get mad at you for daring to question their lowercase G gods in the white lab coats.
But it is still important and it is still helping.
California Governor Gavin Newsom claimed ignorance this week when he was confronted about his sweeping vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In 2021, Newsom began requiring state employees to take the COVID-19 injections and strongly recommended that children who are statistically at zero risk of serious illness or death also receive the experimental shots.
In October 2021, Newsom announced plans to add the shots to the list of required vaccinations for K through 12 students.
That's right.
We need to inject our kindergartners with untested, unproven, unknown mRNA vaccine.
We don't know what it's going to do.
We don't know the kind of long-term effects it has, but your kindergartner needs it.
Inject this genetic code injection into your children.
Well, we do know some things about it, such as it greatly increases their chance of myocarditis and all that, but hey, that's allegedly rare.
They're rare.
And of course, even by their own fake pandemic numbers and science, we always knew that, as the article says, children were at like negligible, zero risk, basically, of anything.
even by the numbers that they were cooking in the books.
Children.
KWD68 Bird Flu.
Watch out.
CDC is sending out propaganda again.
I saw two geese with masks yesterday.
They knew.
That's right.
The geese, they're plotting, they're scheming.
We've got to keep an eye on them.
Make sure you get geesebusters on the horn.
He's the only one who can save us in these times of trouble.
He's the hero we need.
Plandemic would be a great distraction And help crush the dollar.
Yeah.
My only question is if people will buy it again so soon.
They may have to come up with something different.
There's certainly a cohort of people that are still completely and utterly bought in, but it's not the massive number that it was previously.
It's very rare nowadays to see somebody in a mask.
When you do, it's enough to make you go, wow, how are they still buying into this?
In interview Tuesday, podcast host Sean Ryan asked Newsom a question on behalf of fellow podcaster Joe Rogan.
Who will be held accountable for man?
And this is the question.
Who will be held accountable for mandating COVID-19 vaccines for children which were unnecessary and ineffective?
And who will take responsibility for the unprecedented increases of myocarditis and cancer cases among them?
Rogan asked.
A good question.
Second to that, he added, do you feel any remorse for the draconian decision that was obviously heavily influenced by pharmaceutical companies' desire for maximum profit?
And these are honestly very good questions from Joe Rogan.
Again, I give Joe Rogan a lot of grief.
But, you know, sometimes, sometimes he does good.
This is one of those.
But Gavin Newsom knew.
He is.
He is.
Again, shifting claim.
Oh, how could anyone have known?
He says, I know everyone's a gosh darn.
He doesn't say gosh darn.
Genius now in hindsight.
But at the time, none of us knew what we were up against, said Newsom.
That's right.
None of us knew.
None of us knew it was just a happy coincidence that this led to obscene profits for a big pharma and the extension of my power.
My power as the governor creeping into more of your everyday life, allowing me to lock you down and abuse you.
It was just a happy little coincidence.
None of us knew.
How could any of us know when I was censoring and deplatforming anyone that spoke against it?
That's right.
It's not my fault.
It was all just an accident.
How could any of us have known?
It became clear in the beginning of the pandemic that children were not at risk of acuity from COVID-19.
And of course that there was no pandemic.
It all became clear very rapidly.
A May 2020 European study showed less than 2% of hospitalizations and no excess deaths among under 18s.
The CDC itself said in August 2020 that children were less susceptible.
By mid-2021, the CDC acknowledged that children made up less than 0.01% of COVID-19 deaths.
And those are the phony numbers, the fake numbers that the government kept putting out, the ones where, oh yeah, if you die while you have COVID, you get thrown into the mix.
Crashed your motorcycle and died?
Well, that sounds like a COVID death to me.
you actually play the video to the article so we're gonna go ahead and run that So this is from Joe Rogan.
Oh, God.
This is a tough one.
He won't have me on the show, by the way.
Who will be held accountable for mandating COVID-19 vaccines for children which were unnecessary and ineffective?
And who will take responsibility for the unprecedented increases in myocarditis and cancer cases among them?
Second to that, do you feel any remorse for that draconian decision that was obviously heavily enough?
I'm going to have to censor that in post if we let him say what he has to say.
Of course, he doesn't say anything.
He just says, how could I have known?
I guess you're all geniuses now.
Hindsight in 2020 and all that.
He's completely unremorseful.
He has zero interest in owning up and taking accountability for what he did.
But of course, that's how these people operate.
Because this was always the plan.
He's not going to be remorseful.
He's not going to admit fault and say, ah, I'm sorry.
You're right, I made a mistake.
Because he did exactly what he was supposed to do, what he wanted to do.
He extended his power.
He made a lot of money for the pharmaceutical companies.
It worked exactly as planned.
That's what the plan was.
Ah, Handy, good to see you, Handy.
We read your sub stack at the beginning of this.
I saw a 17 year old high school kid die after a school mandated the jab, threw a touchdown pass playing flag football and dropped.
Never could get him back.
That's so sad to hear.
That's awful.
Of course, at 17, they're continually pushing these things on you.
And you haven't fully developed that age.
It's easy for us now as adults or easier to stand up to pressure, to say, no, I'm my own man.
I can do what I want.
You're not going to force this on me.
And at 17, all your friends are getting the vaccine.
You want to continue to play sports or be involved with extracurricular activities.
And you keep hearing, well, it's safe and effective.
It's helpful.
It'll allow you to do all these things that you want to do.
It's completely and utterly unconscionable.
My poor child.
KWD 8.
Knew some smirking and deflecting blame and all that.
Who could have known?
Yeah, and we can celebrate having to deflect blame, but let's not forget the lives that have been destroyed and ended by this type of thing.
Yeah, KWD 68, lots of high school athletes have died the last couple of years.
Tragic.
Nobody connects the dots.
Yeah.
I never saw stories about, you know, high school footballers or track and field stars, whatever, just dropping dead of heart attacks until after this.
I'd never once in my life seen anything like that.
And now it's just fairly common to the point where it's not even reported on that much like it was at the start.
And it's still happening.
Newsome attended an elite party at the swanky restaurant French laundry.
Rena's fellow revelers also violated his mask mandate.
He ordered children to maintain masks in schools, but attended events unmasked.
He kept places of worship closed, even as he allowed restaurants, malls, offices, schools, and factories to reopen.
Home Bible studies were also forbidden.
Of course, this goes to Joe.
Who could have known?
I guess you're all geniuses with hindsight.
He knew.
He wasn't masking.
He went to parties.
He didn't care.
He didn't have any fear.
He wasn't out locked up in his room cowering.
He was out at fancy restaurants having parties with friends.
Probably getting more campaign donations.
This is who all our politicians are.
You're going to do what I say.
I don't have to follow the rules.
You're going to follow them though.
Your kids are going to have to get the vaccine.
They're going to have to wear the masks.
Not me, though.
Not me.
I get to do what I want.
That's the privilege of power, right?
Jury awards $4 million to St. Louis school employee denied religious exemption from COVID vaccine.
This is a hopeful start.
Thirteen current former public school employees in the federal jury trial sued the district after being placed on unpaid administrative leave in 2021.
The school district accepted medical exemptions, but they discriminated against us and they chose to deny every single religious exemption that was submitted.
Oh, well, if you've got a medical reason, I guess we can allow you to not take the COVID vaccine.
I guess if it's going to cause you provable physical harm.
If you have a letter from our gods, then we'll let you go.
Yeah.
But if you've got some ethical, religious reasons for not wanting to take it, sorry, we don't care.
It doesn't matter to us.
Federal jury in St. Louis awarded $4 million to 13 current and former employees of St. Louis Public Schools.
That's about $300,000 each.
The 13 employees are among 43 plaintiffs who sued the district in June 2022 for allegedly violating their First Amendment rights, their due process, and equal protection rights under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Missouri Human Rights Act.
In late June, jurors voted in favor of the plaintiffs on all counts awarding them $1,018,175 in actual damages and $2,990,000 in punitive damages.
Of course, that means the taxpayers are getting to foot the bill.
It's great that they're being awarded this money.
They deserve it.
The government, the school district, did violate their rights.
But there's no consequences for Moderna or Pfizer, these people that pushed the vaccine.
It's the taxpayers footing the bill once again.
The main thing was to show the district that what they did was wrong, to just totally ignore the religious exemption request.
We were treated as if religious beliefs don't hold any type of weight, and they don't for these people.
They despise them.
If you have any Christian beliefs, they hate you.
We've seen it over and over again with a type of radicals that become school teachers.
They absolutely despise you.
And it doesn't just stop at the teachers.
The people in the school boards who become principals are all the same.
It's this long march from the institutions.
Yeah, Frankfurt School.
It's the same type of Marxist that gets in to the woodwork there.
Whether they're teachers or as I said on the school board or the principal, they tend to share the exact same beliefs.
They have no interest in your religion.
In fact, they hate it and hate you for it.
They want to brainwash your kids.
They want to steal them away.
They want to make them stand up and salute the trans pride flag, the LGBT flag, whichever one.
And I'm not for standing and saluting the American flag necessarily either.
But it shows you what they want your children to worship.
In August 2021, St. Louis Public Schools announced the district vaccine mandate, which took effect on October 15, 2021.
According to the policy, medical exemption requests would be considered on a case-by-case basis, and the schools would offer reasonable accommodations absent undue hardship to employees with sincerely held religious beliefs or observances or practices that conflict with getting vaccinated.
And then they denied every single one.
Every single one that came in and like, no, no, I don't think so.
You're going to go get that vax or you're going to get out.
And I'm sure they loved being able to give that ultimatum.
Because either you get it and you bow to their will, or you don't and you're kicked out.
Either way, it gets them more power.
Either way you had to buckle and sacrifice your morals, your beliefs, which case you're not really a threat to them because you'll cave under pressure.
Or you don't get it and they get to throw you out and you're not there anymore.
And as such, they get a bigger piece of the pie for themselves.
They'd accepted medical, but they discriminated against us and they chose to deny every single religious exemption that was committed.
Of course, same sort of thing was happening with the military.
Jason Barker helped people by writing a letter that they could use as a template to kind of write their own, to help them not have to get the vaccine and not deal with a dishonorable discharge.
I believe that's what the penalty was.
Either you take it or we're going to throw you out.
I don't believe they were prosecuting people for not getting it.
Aye handy.
I was banned from Twitter for two years for just asking if any other medical professionals were seeing critically ill patients post-jab.
We had ambulances lined up at nursing homes on jab days.
They knew what they were doing.
Everyone was like, yeah, better put better be ready.
The elderly are not going to do well with this.
Aye, handy again.
SADS is as absurd as SIDS.
First, I can prove there was no such thing as SADS by looking at my text booms from EMT and medic school.
Yeah, it's just, oh, that's, they continually gaslight people.
And I hate using that term, but it fits.
This has always been that.
This has always been a thing.
It was happening.
Just wasn't being reported on.
We weren't covering it.
They continually pull that nonsense.
Textbooks, not texts.
But yeah, that's what they do.
We just didn't have the tools to properly diagnose it.
We didn't have a way of tracking it.
We weren't reporting on it.
There's always some excuse for why this is cropping up now and it wasn't before.
Oh, it's simply for these reasons.
Ignore the fact that, you know, you never experienced it in your daily life and no one that you knew experienced it in their daily life and so on.
Now, it's common enough that everyone has some kind of knowledge of it happening.
And he says I went to school in 2004 and 2006.
SADS is not in any of my textbooks.
Yeah.
It's something that's new and wonderful thanks to the pharmaceutical companies, but you know, hey, just ignore that.
It's always been happening.
Don't fret.
It's nothing to worry about.
Of course, SADS being sudden adult death syndrome, like they say SIDS is sudden infant death syndrome.
Unvaccinated employees were allowed the option to submit weekly tests only if their medical or religious exemption requests were granted, St. Louis today reported.
But since St. Louis public schools denying all religious exemptions, it was either get the vaccine or goodbye, Brandon said.
That's right.
Get the vaccine or get out.
We don't want you here.
Either prove you're a good little drone that will submit to our will, or get out of the door.
We don't want to see you.
We don't want to chance it that you might stand up for something.
That ruling led to a series of settlements.
Most of the 43 employees previously reached settlements ranging from $25,000 to $90,000 each.
Of course, these 13, as I said, got about $300,000 each, which is wonderful for them.
I'm very happy they were able to get that judgment.
They deserve it.
My anticipation is that they will appeal for various reasons, Casper said.
I think the size of the verdicts is a reason.
He's talking about the school.
These are the types of people that we have been turning our kids over.
No, you can't have a religious exemption for the vaccine.
You're going to get that vaccine.
If you don't, you can't work here.
We don't want you.
Give us your children.
These are the types of people that conservatives just blindly, trusting the system, turn their kids over to, then wonder why they come home as gay communists.
What happened?
How could this have happened?
I don't understand.
And then of course, when they finally do get caught and exposed that this was harmful all along, it was, oh, well, who could have known?
We didn't know.
Yeah, oh.
How did this happen?
We didn't know.
This is, again, who runs the school system.
From top to bottom, as a general rule, it's filled up with people that are going to push whatever propaganda comes down the pipeline.
They're completely invested in the power structure.
Whatever people in the power structure say, they're going to parrot.
They're good little followers.
They love authority.
They love having it.
And as such, they love anyone above them with authority.
Geesebusters, $50.
David.
Hope to see you soon.
That is incredibly generous.
Thank you so much.
Hope to see you soon.
He'll be back soon.
We're working on it.
Don't frag me, bro.
The number of athletes who have died of cardiac arrest in the last five years is roughly equivalent to the number that died in the prior 38 years.
Well, I mean, nothing to see here.
Frag.
Why would you worry about that?
Obviously, it's some kind of, you know, it's probably to do with global warming.
The fields are just a little bit too warm, so they can't handle it anymore.
S-Flow 0818.
What would be better?
Let the politicians get sued?
I mean, sue every single person involved with this.
Politicians, people on the school board, the companies.
Every single one of them should be having to pay everything they're worth.
That's, I don't know how you would accomplish that.
Every single one of them should be prosecuted for their role.
They should be put into generational debt.
Their families should know that this is going to cost them until their bloodline withers.
Perhaps that's a bit extreme.
Not in my opinion.
But this should be something where if you commit this level of crime against humanity, we bleed you dry financially at minimum.
That's the minimum we should do.
What is the PrEP Act?
This is by Debbie Luhrmann of the Brownstone Institute.
And of course, most of you probably know what the PrEP Act is.
It's what allows them so much control, what allows them to declare an emergency.
In conjunction with the EUA Emergency Use Authorization, the PrEP Act is the legislation that enabled and continues to perpetuate the rollout and administration of mRNA countermeasures against COVID-19.
Of course, RFK and Trump are still allowing this to go on.
We're not going to touch that.
Not going to do anything about that.
Handy.
It's a catch-all MacGuffin.
SIDS slash SADS tells you nothing about the actual cause of death.
Yeah, it's just they died suddenly.
Well, what happened?
Ah, you know, sudden.
It was sudden.
We don't know.
We're not going to look into it.
Of course, the COVID emergency ended May 11th, 2023.
But the emergency is still in effect.
The countermeasures.
Still going strong.
Anyone defined as a covered person is immune from legal liability related to the use or administration of anything defined as a covered countermeasure.
A license to kill, basically.
You're using a covered countermeasure, so don't worry about it.
We've approved this.
A covered person includes A, the United States, or B, any person or entity that manufactures, distributes, plans, a program for, prescribes, administers, or disperses a covered countermeasure, or an official agent or employee of any of the above.
That's right.
Any of those things, and you just get a free license to kill.
You get to inject people with this approved countermeasure.
And as such, you know, you're a covered person.
We're not going to be able to do anything to you.
The HHS Secretary has the sole discretion to determine that a disease or other health condition or other threat to health constitutes a public health emergency.
So RFK, go ahead and end that for us, please.
Just go ahead and do that.
That'd be appreciated.
I think it might be a little bit more important than getting Red 40 out of the food.
The Secretary can change any aspect of the Declaration of Emergency without retroactively affecting the immunity granted under the Declaration.
Isn't that wonderful?
So even if they come in and say, yeah, we were totally wrong.
This was a horrible thing to do.
We made a mistake.
This was poisoning people.
It was killing people.
You know, you're still not, you're still getting immunity.
It's not going to retroactively change anything, which is really what needs to happen.
You need to come in and say, yeah, this was poison.
We killed a lot of people with this.
You guys killed a lot of people by injecting them.
And no more immunity.
And by the way, since the science was out there and you either failed to look at it or knowingly injected people anyway, you're getting prosecuted.
You're all getting prosecuted.
It's prison.
No court, whether federal or state has subject matter jurisdiction to review any action by the Secretary related to the emergency declaration.
No state may pass or enforce any law that is different from or in conflict.
Huh.
You know, the federal government just coming in and saying, telling the states what they can and can't do.
Sorry, you can't pass any laws that are going to impact this.
You can't give your citizens cover and a way to avoid it.
States don't have any rights, apparently.
I missed that part in the Constitution.
This is the exception to immunity of covered persons.
These two sections define the circumstances under which the PrEP Act immunity does not apply.
In general, the sole exception is defined as an exclusive federal cause of action against a covered person for death or serious physical injury caused by willful misconduct.
The definition of willful misconduct is an act or omission taken intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose, knowingly without legal or actual factual justification in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.
This is specifically defined as a standard for liability that is more stringent than a standard of negligence in any form or recklessness.
A plaintiff who tries to sue under this section has the burden of proving by clear convincing evidence willful misconduct.
Of course, proving that sort of thing is extremely difficult under the best of circumstances, especially when you have the entire federal government arrayed behind them.
Seven-day disclosure exception.
If a qualified person or program planner acted under the HHS Secretary's directions, guidelines, or recommendations regarding a covered countermeasure, if that person or planner provided within seven days either to the Secretary or a state or local health authority with a notice of information related to the plaintiff's alleged loss, that person or planner shall not have engaged in willful misconduct as a matter of law.
Another get out of jail free car.
Here you go.
Well, just in case.
So a seven-day statute of limitations on any of the crimes a doctor could commit up to murder, as we've seen with Grace Shara.
If either the HHS Secretary nor the Attorney General initiates enforcement action with respect to an act or omission, in a willful misconduct claim against a manufacturer distributor, then that act or omission shall not constitute willful misconduct.
So if they don't do anything about it, it's not willful misconduct.
Isn't that wonderful?
Don't do anything about it within seven days of it happening.
The extremely consequential and arguably unconstitutional PrEP Act became part of U.S. law in December 2005 through a surreptitious, rushed process that allowed little to no debate or discussion.
Here's how it happened.
Sunday, December 18th, 2005, the U.S. House and Senate finished their deliberations over the FY 2006 budget, an omnibus spending bill.
Night of Sunday, December 18th, 2005, the PrEP Act was inserted into the Defense Appropriations Bill, which was part of the omnibus spending bill.
Monday, December 19th, 2005, the appropriations bill with the PrEP Act legislation was approved by the House of Representatives in a vote of 308 to 106.
According to the clerk's records, the vote took place at 5.04 a.m., which would be just a few hours after the PrEP Act had been inserted.
So they rush this thing in.
It's around Christmas time.
They love doing that.
They love having holidays as cover.
People aren't paying as much attention.
Everyone wants to get home and be with their family.
They bring this in and insert it into a different bill, into the spending bill, the appropriations, just a few hours before the vote is supposed to happen.
No one has time to read this.
5.04 a.m.
It gets voted on.
Tuesday, December 20th, 2005, law professor and legal scholar Erwin Kemerinsky submitted a letter to Senator Patrick Leahy detailing ways in which the PrEP Act is unconstitutional.
Oh well, if we're going to start repealing laws because they're unconstitutional, we're going to have a lot of work ahead of us.
Wednesday, December 21st, 2005, the Kemerinsky letter was entered into the Congressional records and the only debate slash discussion about the PrEP Act took place.
Members of the Senate expressed their frustration with the fact that the Act was inserted secretly into the spending bill with no time for debate and no committee reviews or discussions.
That seems to be more and more the norm.
Why would you debate or read what's in these bills?
Who cares?
You just gotta pass them.
Whatever's in there, that's for the American people to deal with.
Thursday, December 22nd, 2005, despite those vehement objections, the Senate passed the omnibus bill with PrEP Act 93 to 0, and 7 not voting.
So 93, 4, no votes against.
Seven of them just like, ugh, I don't want my name on this, but I'm not going to oppose it either.
On December 21st, 2005, the only day on which the PrEP Act was ever discussed or debated by any legislator, either Chamber of Congress, a number of prominent senators raised very serious objections to the proposed legislation, which, as they pointed out, is not an appropriation, but an actual law, and the way in which it was snuck into the appropriations bill.
Objections notwithstanding, the following day, they voted for it.
They just said, yeah, sure, I know we've got some objections, but eh, I want to get home.
And that's the best interpretation of it.
The best interpretation of how our politicians behave is that they're incredibly lazy and unwilling to do their job.
They're so incredibly lazy, they'll vote on anything so they don't have to stick around and debate it and figure out what's wrong.
Senator Ted Kennedy, Democrat Massachusetts, of course, that's RFK's uncle.
I ask unanimous consent to amend the resolution to strike Division E, Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act.
This is the provision that provides drug companies with unprecedented immunity from liability, which was added to the Defense Appropriations Bill in the conference during the middle of the night.
It does not belong in this bill.
Of course, that was his objection.
Senator Joe Biden, I rise to express my surprise and deep-seated opposition to the so-called Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, which is included in the Defense Department Appropriations Bill.
This provision would give the Secretary of Health and Human Services authority to provide almost total immunity from liability to the makers of almost any drug, to those who administer it.
Wow.
Incredible.
Something I might actually agree with from Joe Biden.
Isn't that strange?
Senator Hillary Clinton.
I support limited liability protections for manufacturers to help cover their risks in developing products that a nation will need in case of emergency, for this provision would grant immunity to all claims of loss, including death and disability for a broad range of products.
Hillary Clinton and of course now Senator Robert Byrd, mister KKK himself, I continue to have serious concerns about the avian flu related liability while misconduct can be compensated.
Prep Act emergency declarations in effect now.
It's truly amazing the people that objected to this.
Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Robert Byrd.
Of course, they can make whatever statements they want when the rubber hit the road and it was time to implement these things.
They were all for it.
They were very excited.
Yeah, we'll note our objections for our base down here.
PrEP Act emergency declarations in effect now.
According to a December 18th, 2024 report from the Government Accountability Office, these are the PrEP Act emergency declarations that are in effect now.
This means that the HHS Secretary has determined that there is a current or future risk of a public health emergency that justifies indemnifying from any legal liability anyone who manufactures, distributes, administers, or does anything else related to countermeasures, which the Secretary also determines against these threats?
Anthrax, acute radiation syndrome, botulinum toxin, pandemic influenza, smallpox and other orthopox viruses, Ebola, Zika, nerve agents and certain insecticides, COVID-19, Marburg.
Those are all currently going.
That's right.
In case of anthrax, they have full immunity if they distribute something to deal with it.
It's truly the anthrax was something that, you know, being homeschooled and not having TV, we didn't get much fear propaganda.
We didn't absorb any of this.
I had no idea until fairly recently, within the last few years, how paranoid people were about anthrax.
How they had woven that into the fabric of society for a while.
Oh man, these anthrax attacks.
They're terrifying.
They're happening.
We've got to do something about it.
Never, never cropped up as a homeschooler with no TV.
Wasn't something I was ever concerned about.
As far as I knew, the only anthrax that we had to deal with in the U.S. was the band.
PrEP Acting COVID-19.
On March 17th, 2020, Secretary of HHS Alex Azar issued the first declaration under the PrEP Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19.
And of course, that's Trump's big pharma pick, CEO of Eli Lilly, the revolving door of politics and big corporations.
The declaration was amended slash extended 12 times.
The last amendment extended the declaration until December 31st, 2029.
This means that for 10 years from the beginning of 2020 to the end of 2029, anyone who does anything related to any product designated As a countermeasure against COVID-19, has no legal liability for any harm or damage caused by that product.
Isn't that wonderful?
You were just following orders, and as such, you get a free pass.
Nothing you do while administering these products can be considered.
Can you be sued for?
We've got your back.
Turns out Joe Biden, under whose administration the PrEP Act was extended 11 times, was correct when he noted that under this law, of course that was from 2005, a drug maker can be grossly negligent in making or distributing a drug and still escape liability.
He can even make that drug with wanton recklessness and escape scot-free after harming thousands of people.
He was correct.
He was right.
He knew what was coming.
Not that he did anything about it when he was in power.
You could, of course, give Biden the benefit of the doubt and say he was so mentally gone, so out to lunch that he wasn't going to do it, but that's a bridge too far.
We all know that these people never take power or give power back once they've taken it.
These statements from these politicians make a lot more sense if you had wahaha at the end of them, he said while gleefully rubbing his hands together and jumping up and down like a small child on Christmas.
And Senator Ted Kennedy, whose nephew has had the sole authority to end the COVID Prep Act emergency declaration from the moment he stepped into his role as HHS Secretary, was correct in his damning assessment.
This is a sham.
There is no possibility of liability here.
As he said, RFK, the nephew, has the sole authority to end the COVID Prep Act.
He could do it.
He's just not going to.
Little Ford Schoolhouse, yes, I'm sure they didn't know anything, having their secret meetings and dinner parties with all the elites.
Nah, how could they have?
They didn't know anything, but, you know, they're still going to go hang out with friends and spend a lot of money.
Mike is open.
Defy Tyrant 1776.
Conva jabs have absolutely nothing to do with curing an invisible fairy tale.
I'm 100% convinced that there's something very sinister surrounding the warp speed poison.
Yeah.
As I keep saying, we have no idea what the long-term effects of this are going to be.
Short-term, we see kids dropping dead of heart attacks, myocarditis, blood clots.
We see all kinds of horrendous things, but that's the short term.
Little Ford Schoolhouse.
Yes, if they can't get us to kill our kids before they're born, they'll try to wear us down to get them vaccines that cause them problems, feed them foods that make them sick, or send them to indoctrination facilities.
Yeah.
They're desperate to get the kids one way or another.
Like you said, if they can't get you to abort them, they want to make sure that there's no chance of them ever standing up.
Whether it's by making them broken and sick and destroying their quality of life.
Or just by turning them into gay Marxist communists.
Defy a tyrant 1776.
The best cure for Convid was to turn your TV off and boom.
No more Convid.
Yeah.
Funny how the pandemic went away if you simply didn't watch the propaganda.
Funny how.
If you stop paying attention, you didn't have to worry about it.
Well, I think...
We have a video on the board about that.
I can play.
Yeah, go ahead and run that.
So, you know, there's a number of things that happened in 1989.
But those diseases, all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared.
I never knew anybody with juvenile diabetes.
When I was a kid, a typical pediatrician would see one case of juvenile diabetes in his career.
Today, one out of every three kids who walk through his office door has it.
Something happened.
Why isn't anybody talking about this?
Rheumatoid arthritis suddenly exploded, lupus, all these autoimmune diseases, you know, Crohn's disease, these exotic diseases.
Nobody ever heard of when I was a kid.
Now everyone knows someone ever has something.
And so you have allergic diseases, you have neurological disease and autoimmune diseases and obesity suddenly appear around 1989.
And so there's a number of things that could be blamed for it.
Well, the CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule.
Let's check.
So they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine.
They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days.
And then they looked at kids who had not gotten it in 30 days.
In other words, kids who got it later or didn't get it at all.
And they compared these two groups.
And among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was a I think it was a 10,000% increased risk.
And the PrEP Act, RFK.
You have soul power.
I'm talking about these signs of odds and diagnosis.
If you got in the first 30 days.
Wow.
So they immediately knew what was causing it.
Oh, I know it was.
It was 11.35.
So it's 1,135% increased risk.
And so they knew immediately, it's called a relative risk of 11.35.
If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed.
This was 11.35.
The link between cigarettes, smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10.
This was 11.35.
They knew what it was.
And then they had an emergency meeting that they called.
They didn't want to do it on CDC campus because they thought it would be susceptible to freedom of information requests.
They love their secret meeting.
No, I don't want anyone to be able to be able to access it.
It's a center called Simpson Woods, a Methodist Retreat Center on the wooded banks of the Chattahoochee River in a remote part of Georgia.
And they had all of the big Panjerums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry, from the universities who are the ones who test the vaccines, from NIH, CDC, FDA, the World Health Organization, the European Medical Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study.
the first day they're all and somebody made a transcript of it and that transcript And I published excerpts from it.
But the first day, they're all talking about, oh, my God, you know, the lawyers are going to come after us.
Nobody can deny this.
This is bulletproof.
You know, there's no way to argue with this.
This is real science.
We can't, you know, what are we going to do?
The second day, they spend talking about how to hide it from the American public.
Seems like you should be doing something about it.
And that should be your priority, RFK, if you have all this info.
Well.
Secret meetings.
How do we hide this from the public?
RFK not really doing anything about it, though, is he?
Not even going to end the Prep Act.
Well, before we continue on, I want to play the update for you from our dad.
That way you can hear directly from him.
When we come back, we'll talk more about what's going on with COVID.
The mic is open.
We are going to.
As I said, this is the first update, video update from him since the strokes.
We really can't thank you enough for all the prayers.
We cannot thank you enough for everything.
The support, but especially the prayers.
And we ask that you continue to pray for him.
Here's my dad telling you what happened.
And as I said, first look.
Remember me?
Remember me?
It's been a while, hasn't it?
It's been over two months, coming up to three months.
And throughout this time, of course, Travis and Lance stepped up.
I really appreciate what they've done.
They've done about 40 to 50 shows on their own.
I didn't ask them.
They just kind of jumped into it seeing the need.
And that's kind of the way I got started doing guest hosting.
But I really want to thank all of you who have supported the show with your prayers as well, especially with your prayers.
That's made all the difference in the world.
I want to give you an idea of what happened and kind of where I am now.
You can hear my speech is a bit slurred still.
I'm not quite as bad as I was.
I started out as Sylvester Stallone and Sylvester the Cat, kind of mixed together with a drawl as well as a slurping.
I've been working on that and actually my brain has healed a little bit.
They call it brain plasticity.
And it's when you have a brain injury, your brain starts to retrain itself.
Of course, it's easier the younger you are, and that's a bit of an issue for me.
But it gradually starts to adapt that function.
And so I'm gradually getting back some motor skills and other things, but I'm very tired all the time.
And according to the family, I've not been impaired in terms of perception or understanding.
It's just being able to speak that's been a big issue.
That's been a function of the operation that I had.
So just briefly, let me tell you what happened because, as I said, I've gotten so many cards, so many letters, so many comments that are kind and concerned.
And I really felt like I needed to tell people what the situation was because it isn't just a show.
We have a community here of people who talk to each other on a regular basis.
And many people were wondering what my current condition was and what actually happened.
Well, it began on a Thursday, and it was just before noon.
We had an interview that we had had to pre-record.
And as I was working, my left hand stopped working, which was really strange.
And then I fell out of my chair.
And as I thought about it, I thought, did I fall asleep?
Because I was very tired prior to that.
I hadn't had much sleep that night before.
And I think what it was at the time was a TIA, a transient ischemic attack, which is just like a mini-stroke, but it doesn't do any permanent damage.
And I got over it right away.
But then the next night, the next day as I was resting, I had a real stroke.
I don't think it was a TIA.
I mean, I did recover from it fairly quickly.
They took me to the hospital.
The guy interviewed me.
He said, well, we do have some dangerous medicine that we could give you, but you seem to have recovered your function, so we're going to let it go at that.
And I had use of my left hand again as well.
Both times, it affected my left side.
So they didn't do anything, but they said they did an MRI and some other things like that.
They said they thought it was going to come back because my carotid artery was corroded.
So they wanted to do an operation.
And it wasn't this hospital that was going to do it.
I would have been kind of concerned about that.
I don't like to, you know, my skepticism of the current medical community and the corporate medicine that is there.
But it wasn't going to be their profit doing it.
And they were very concerned.
The doctor was trying to get me in several different hospitals that had the capability to do it.
And so we went ahead and we had the operation.
And unfortunately, the operation created all the problems.
It's kind of like when you take pharmaceutical drugs, you take them for condition A, and it gives you a whole string of adverse effects.
And one of those is going to be condition A and exacerbates it.
Well, the operation itself caused me to have a third stroke.
And in the process of the operation, they damaged my vocal cords as well as a nerve that controls my tongue, which is what you can hear right now.
And it is a nerve under the tongue.
And so this is now two months of recovering from it.
I didn't think I'd ever be able to talk at all.
I mean, as bad as I sound now, you should have heard me then.
And so just really do appreciate your prayers because it is God who heals, not corporate medicine.
And there has been a tremendous change.
I will be able to do the show.
It may be a bit trying for people to listen to me, but I will be doing the show with Travis.
And he will be, if I start speaking in tongues, he will translate for me.
So we'll see how that all goes.
It has been a real interesting time, hasn't it?
We're now in the middle of the mother of all MAGA storms.
People are looking at Trump, and some of them are actually saying the stuff that I've been saying for five years.
I mean, who knew that this guy was a pal of Jeffrey Epstein?
I think we all knew that.
Now they're pretending that they never knew.
And they pretend that they believe that he's going to obey the Constitution, the rule of law, and that he was going to do the things that he said to do.
I told you he wasn't going to do that from the very beginning.
But now we have this back and forth.
So it's an interesting time that we live in.
It's something of a curse, right?
The Chinese curse.
But it's been a difficult time.
And I've got to say it has affected me.
You know, when you get hit the right frontal lobe, it affects your left side.
But it also affects you emotionally.
And it's been a difficult thing for me to control my emotions.
And so that's been another adverse effect of it.
So having Travis here in the driver's seat while I'm riding shotgun will be a good thing.
He'll be able to cut me off if I start bawling uncontrollably over silly things.
We watched, in the hospital, I think we watched Pride and Prejudice five or six times.
No, I have not had a gender change.
And it wasn't really over the sentimentality of it that we watched it so many times.
I love the cinematography of it, not the sentimentality.
And I love the music score on it.
And it took me out of that horrific place I was in, intensive care unit.
And I knew Karen liked it.
We had watched a couple of other movies, nothing else to do in the hospital.
And they were absolutely atrocious.
So, well, let's just watch Pride and Prejudice again.
The newest one, I guess, which I can't remember the director's name, but it had Kira Knightley in it.
And it was nice to get out of the 21st century for a change.
So we just kind of dwelt in that.
It was, you know, we look at this and we wonder why things like this happen, of course, when anything like that happens.
God has his purposes.
And I can see it in Travis and Lance stepping up.
I'm really proud of what they've done.
And I want to thank you so much for supporting the show.
I'll be coming back soon and doing more live broadcasts.
And as I get stronger, I'm working on physical therapy.
And something about a therapist.
I said, make sure people actually tell people, it sounds like you're in psychiatric care, which I would never be in psychiatric care.
But I have physical therapists.
I have a speech therapist that's working with me, has me doing tongue twisters.
Just basic reading is a tongue twister for me at this point in time.
But thank you so much for your support of the show.
It's a great community.
So much love was shown to us and to each other.
Thank you.
Now, as I said, first video of Dad Back.
We cannot thank you all enough for the support.
It has been truly wonderful.
You've sent so many kind words and prayers.
And we're so excited that he is able to start coming back.
I know that you've all been very eager to hear from him.
And we're all so excited to finally get him back on the show.
We're not exactly sure what the setup is going to be.
We're going to figure that out.
But he will be back soon.
It's very exciting.
I'm so happy to have him back.
And just, again, cannot thank you all enough for the prayers.
We truly believe that is one of the reasons, the main reason, possibly the only reason, he is still here with us.
So please continue to pray.
Florida's health chief calls for mRNA vaccine ban should not be used in any human beings.
Finally, people are starting to speak out and say, no, no, this isn't useful.
Not only is it not useful, this thing is terrifying.
shouldn't be used in anyone.
I'm just a...
I'm just right now so excited that we were able to get him back on.
Florida's top health officials calling for a ban on COVID injections, warning that mRNA vaccines are not safe for use by any human beings.
During a press conference, Latipo declared that the mRNA injection should not be used in any human beings.
Latipo, vocal advocate for medical transparency and cautious public health policies, has called for a comprehensive investigation into vaccine injuries, echoing growing concerns about the safety and effectiveness of those vaccines, especially among individuals who have been repeatedly boosted.
During a press conference in Tampa, Florida, Latipo commended the recent shift in federal guidance led by Health and Human Services, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Kennedy announced in May that the COVID vaccines would no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women.
Well, gee.
You can still kill everyone else.
You can inject them with poison.
But healthy children and pregnant women, they're fine.
You know, you can leave them off the list for now.
We'll get them another way.
We've got other vaccines we want to inject them with.
They still should get the MMR poison.
And of course, there's the whooping cough vaccine they continually push.
You got to get your kids the whooping cough vaccine.
Oh, in fact, we've got one now for pregnant women that you can take, and it'll pass the antibodies along.
Sure, it'll potentially injure you or your baby, but you can go ahead and take that instead.
As Florida's first state to formally recommend against vaccination for healthy children, more recently, the broader population of the state has taken a stand that continues to challenge the mainstream narrative.
Laudipo's remarks were pointed and clear.
These products should not be used in any human beings, he declared, calling for more investigation into the reports of vaccine injuries.
Should be calling on RFK to end the PrEP Act, calling on him to stop the emergency.
American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, both influential in shaping U.S. medical policy, have remained steadfast in their endorsement of the COVID vaccines.
That's right.
The Academy of Pediatrics.
You gotta get your kids vaccinated with this poison.
Truly shows how far they have gone from do no harm.
Do no harm.
Now, uh, well, you can do as much harm as you want so long as we're making money.
The organizations continue to recommend vaccination for pregnant women and children over six months, despite growing concerns from some segments of the medical community.
And it was only fairly recently they started recommending vaccines at all for pregnant women.
For a while, they were very reticent to recommend vaccines.
Dr. Raina Elisa of the Florida chapter of the AAP was quick to dismiss a lot of those conclusions, stating, honestly, we don't know where his data are coming from.
And it's not going to deter us from continuing to recommend the vaccines.
Yeah, we don't know where he's getting his data.
Who cares?
What does it matter?
We're not going to stop recommending it.
Wherever that data comes from, we haven't seen it.
These people are pure evil.
This doctor Reina Alyssa has completely and utterly given up on Do No Harm.
Alyssa emphasized that decades of research and scientific evidence should not be disregarded based on the opinions of a single individual or group, framing Latipo's views as conspiracy theories rather than legitimate scientific debate.
Well, there wasn't any legitimate science done to research the vaccine, was there?
There wasn't any testing regarding safety or efficacy.
We got it at warp speed.
This woman.
I'm assuming it's woman.
I don't think Reyna is a man's name.
We're not going to take someone's opinion.
We're going to keep injecting you with poison.
No, we didn't do any testing.
We didn't look into whether it's dangerous.
Do no harm has been completely and utterly disregarded.
Stell's Patriot, thank you very much.
Appreciate it.
No offense, Travis.
You're getting better and better, but David is something special.
What a legacy.
You, Travis, do not need to go away.
Great job filling it.
Well, I appreciate the kind words.
I appreciate that you find me acceptable.
That is, in comparison to David, that is truly very kind.
Don't frag me, bro.
If the government can break the law for emergencies, then the government will create emergencies to break the law.
That's right.
If you give them a way to get around the law, they'll always use that same way.
Don't frag me, bro.
More medical professionals need to set up local small clinics and take cash and other forms of payment, even if no insurance, yeah.
One jaded view.
Remember thinking with the rollout that the effects would be too obvious to hide, for sure people would wake up.
No, yeah, it's very difficult.
People will choose to believe experts rather than their own eyes.
No, sorry.
I know that people are being injured by the vaccine.
I know that we're seeing this in greater numbers.
I know kids are dropping dead on the school soccer field or football field, but this guy in a lab coat says it's normal.
I know I've never seen it before.
I know none of you ever have.
I've never seen a story like this, but hey, the powers that be said it's nothing to worry about.
So, you know, it's nothing to worry about.
Why would I believe my own eyes when there's an expert I can believe instead?
Audi, MR, thank you.
That is so incredibly generous.
We really do appreciate it.
Prayer works.
Yes, it does.
Fantastic seeing Mr. Knight again.
Again, Audi, that's modernretroradio.com.
We really do thank you all for the prayers.
We cannot thank you enough for the prayers.
We're going to take a quick break.
When we come back, we're going to look at this article from the Expose.
But I'm going to take a quick break so I can gather my thoughts.
But again, thank you all so much.
David will be back soon.
And we'll be getting, even if he's not on the show immediately, we will be having more reports from him and more interviews.
So please keep him in your prayers, but also be excited because he's coming back.
Thank you all.
Thank you.
you you Defending the American Dream.
You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Welcome back, folks.
Again, I'm just, I'm so excited that we're able to play that for you to get you to be able to see my dad.
And I think he sounds great.
I think he's doing great.
And I cannot wait to have him back on the show.
I, for one, am ready to slink back into obscurity behind the camera.
I'll probably still be on camera a bit.
We'll figure it out as time goes on.
But I know you're all eager to have him back, but none more so than I. And again, thank you so much for all the prayers.
That is what truly, truly matters.
And I also want to remind you, if you would like to financially support the show, there are many ways to do that.
You can leave a tip on Rumble or subscribe on Kick.
There's also DavidKnight.news where you can go and see the products that we have there.
There's a lot of them.
You're going to also see how you can support the show directly.
There's the P.O. box, which is David Knight, P.O. Box 994, Kodak, Tennessee, 37764.
And that's where we've gotten so many kind words and cards and just wonderful, wonderful.
It's truly amazing to see how much you all love my dad.
And I cannot thank you enough for all that.
And there is subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight show.
There's a lot of different tiers there.
One of them may fit your budget.
There is Cash App and Zelle, a Bitcoin address.
There is DavidKnight.gold.
If you'd like to start getting some gold or silver, you can go through us to Tony Arderburn.
There's TrendsJournal.com.
With Promo Code Night, you get 10% off the Trends Journal.
Works out to be about $2.50 per week.
There's RNCStore.com where with Promo Code Night you get 10% off their products, which may be able to help you avoid having to deal with the medical industrial complex.
And there's Homestead Products.shop.
They've got high-quality Made America products where with Promo Code Night you get 10% off.
And of course there's JackLawsandBooks.com where you can get the civil defense manual.
Really do thank you for the support and ask that you continue to support the show.
Assyrian Girl.
It's heartbreaking.
It's a heartbreak hearing RFK Jr. talk about the harm inherent in the vaccine schedule, knowing he's ignoring it now.
Yeah.
Just got into office and all of a sudden, well, you know, Red 40 is my main concern.
Defy Tyrant 1776, RFK was totally against the warp speed poison before he said it was the best thing ever.
And of course, you remember when he had that party, he said that it was his wife that made sure that everyone came and had to be vaccinated.
And if he is not in control of his own household to that extent, it's hard to...
It was from the Expose.
A Medazzalam murder.
If you want to kill somebody, get a doctor or a nurse to do it.
That's right.
For the right price.
For the right price, they'll hook you up to a ventilator and prescribe you remdesivir or any other drug that is recommended.
They are licensed to kill.
They have immunity.
Derek Dimock, an 86-year-old man from Putney, UK, was admitted to the Royal Trinity Hospice in June 2020 with gout and later died under controversial circumstances.
His family is alleging he was involuntarily euthanized using midazolam, a sedative often used in end-of-life care.
Of course, this is a lot like a Gray Shara case.
They put the DNR on her without the parents' approval and gave her morphine, which is also used in end-of-life care.
Just managing the pain.
Gotta clear this bed up for someone that's going to allow us to ventilate them.
Got that money to make.
His family claims he was given a cocktail of end-of-life drugs, including midazolam, which they argue was inappropriate and hastened his death.
Derek was given enough midazolam to kill an elephant, a source close to the family said.
The case is currently under investigation with an inquest examining whether his death was a natural occurrence or an unlawful killing.
The case was heard by a senior coroner in March.
Inquest resumes in August 2025.
During an interview, the barrister for the Dimok family explained how midazlame is used by the NHS to end someone's life and said: If you want to kill somebody, get a doctor or a nurse to do it, because it's very, very difficult to pin the blame on them.
Yeah.
Or maybe they have full immunity.
Maybe they're just following the protocols that have been set out by the government.
Of course, this is happening in the UK, but here in the US, as we just read in the first hour, if you follow their directions, they're going to give you immunity.
Oh, you were just doing what we said.
Only midazlam injections correlate with the officially confirmed April 2020 UK excess death.
Nothing else does.
Understandably, some still have questions.
Well, I certainly think the govern-related body should be held to account.
Correlation and causation are not the same thing.
You'd expect drugs used in palliative care to correlate with deaths while cases wouldn't directly correlate because COVID affected the old most.
This is from at Bloody Skies on Twitter.
I've gone off on this, but I don't know if I've done it on the show, but I know in recent times I've been harping on this to family and friends.
Correlation, not equaling causation, has become nothing but a thought-terminating cliché.
It's something to be said to remind us to do our due diligence, to do extra research.
It's not just a way to discard any and all data, any and all suppositions.
Correlation doesn't equal causation is something that's said by a lot of very dumb people because it sounds smart.
It doesn't equal causation.
No, but it could potentially link it.
It could mean that there is a tie there.
It's not this get out of jail-free card.
It doesn't equal causation.
And that's where they stop.
They don't do it.
It can be a strong indicator of causation.
It doesn't always equal causation.
It's not supposed to be, as I said, a thought-terminating cliché that allows them to just discard any and all concerns.
It's supposed to mean, well, go check, go confirm, go do some more research.
But many people today use it just like that.
You bring up some objections, you point to these things which seem very likely to be related.
Like the myocarditis after the COVID injections, people go, well, correlation doesn't equal causation.
And they go along their merry way, not having to think about it any further.
The April 2020 death spike could not have been caused by COVID, is what they say.
As per Dr. Wilson's size peer-reviewed statistical analysis of the exaggerated data, it was not COVID.
New COVID cases from April 2020 do not match deaths.
Of course, medical community was paid very, very well to prescribe these.
Big Pharma made a lot of money, and they're the ones that basically fund the news channels.
They run a lot of cover for them, but the propaganda machine doesn't stop.
The government gives them immunity, and then Big Pharma pays all these channels.
So you get these talking heads to spew whatever you want.
Whatever the current talking point is.
Died with COVID was code for unlawful killing.
Those involved in this industrial-level death orchestrated by the state sought to hide their crimes using deliberate obfuscation on death certificates by labeling those who died in this way as having died with COVID rather than died of COVID.
Of course, we've seen that over and over again.
Inflating the COVID death numbers.
Well, we found, or we say we found, this in their system.
We used the PCR test and magnified it to the point where we could have found anything, but since we were looking for COVID, we say it was there.
And since he had it in his system when he died by crashing his motorcycle or whatever it was, it's a COVID death.
Over and over again we saw this.
To stoke the fear.
Atomic Dog.
Thank you very much, Atomic Dog.
That is very kind.
A dual host format sounds like a great way to ease David back into the chair.
Plus, it's great practice for the new weekly show, roundtable report that may be coming soon.
We'll have to see.
We'll have to see.
Want to make sure that we don't overtax him.
I know you guys are eager to have him back.
I am too.
Want to make it as easy and seamless for him as possible.
But he's on the mend, and he will be back soon.
And of course, I asked, we're going to cut that segment out.
We'll post it for everyone to see on the channels.
But when it's out, please do share it around.
Let people know that he will be back so that they can start preparing.
I know there are certain people out there that cannot stand me, and as such, we'll be so excited to have him back.
And they can come back and watch the segments with him and then immediately slam their laptop closed when I appear on screen.
This is another one from the Expose.
Telegraph alters headline to note that the harms caused by COVID injections have been catastrophic.
On Sunday, the Telegraph published an article describing their interview with Dr. Asim Malhotra.
By Tuesday, the paper had changed its headline to highlight Dr. Malhotra's statement that the COVID vaccines had caused catastrophic harms.
This could be an indication that the noose controlling the safe and effective narrative is loosening further.
As I pointed out at the beginning of the show, when Kevin Newsom came out and said, well, nobody knew.
Nobody had any idea.
He's forced to play that game.
He's not able to any longer come out and say, just do what I say.
This is an emergency here.
Look what's going on.
Propaganda has slipped a little bit.
People aren't buying it as readily as they used to.
It's because people like you have been going out and pointing these things out.
You've been telling your friends and your family.
You've been pointing out these deaths, these spontaneous heart attacks that have been happening over and over again, the blood clots.
They're not able to as easily dismiss them.
They're not able to just come in high-handedly and say, You're going to do what we say.
We have this emergency here.
They have to pretend and feign ignorance.
We didn't know.
It was what we thought was best at the time.
We were doing it for your own good, we promise.
When a few years ago, he would have come in and just said, shut up.
Don't you know there's an emergency going on?
Don't you know people are dying?
On Tuesday, Dr. Asim Malhotra alerted the public to a change in one of the telegraph's headlines to read Asim Malotra, the harm caused by COVID vaccine has been catastrophic.
Extraordinary, Dr. Malhotra treated, we are winning, fist pump.
Trust in doctors at an all-time low, medicine has been hijacked by big pharma.
The harm caused by the COVID vaccine has been catastrophic.
We are winning.
Dr. Asim Malatra, and it's at Dr. Asim Malatra on Twitter.
Yeah.
This is, again, a hopeful sign.
People are waking up.
It can seem futile and fruitless.
It's very difficult to want to have these conversations with people over and over again, because I know we've all had them.
You point out all the evidence, you show them what's happening, and they just kind of glaze over.
Or they get angry at you.
How dare you question these people?
You're not a doctor.
You don't have a lab.
You don't have a degree in this stuff.
Why would I listen to you?
But it is worth it.
Guard Goldsmith, the more one sees correlation, the more one can infer causation.
Yeah, that's right.
And of course, Guard Goldsmith hosts Liberty Conspiracy, and you can find the schedule for his show over at knightsofthestorm.com.
Go check out Guard.
He does amazing work.
Knights of the Storm, correlation is the beginning of science.
If you make the same observation several times, it's correlation.
If you can repeat it in a controlled fashion, then it becomes science and can prove causation.
Knights of the Storm being Jason Barker.
And of course, Angry Tiger and Karen Carpenter, they also do an amazing job on their show.
So go check out Knightsofthestorm.com.
Find the schedule.
Find out where and when you can watch them.
Denver Attaway, regardless of the coefficiency, correlation does not equal causation.
That's exactly how it is used, Travis, 100%.
It's a double thing.
Yeah.
Just turn off your brain.
Correlation doesn't equal causation.
You think you see something there?
Pfft.
Only an idiot would think that these two things that keep happening in relation to each other would be in any way related.
Turn off your brain.
We've got someone in a lab coat that'll tell you what you want to hear.
And of course, this is the original headline.
A similotre, trust in doctors at an all-time low.
Medicine has been hijacked by big pharma.
They then, of course, changed it to the harm caused by the COVID vaccine has been catastrophic.
Even the mainstream media is coming out and admitting this.
This is from The Telegraph.
The Telegraph.
You guys are having an effect.
And it is good to see that.
The Telegraph did report on Dr. Malatra's views, particularly concerning not just COVID vaccines, but all vaccines with less vitriol and name-calling than we would have expected a few years ago.
So perhaps this does add to the changing narrative that we've been getting hints of in UK corporate media that leans to the political right.
Choosing to headline with a bold statement about vaccine harms is certainly a sign that perhaps some sort of off-comm prescribed censorship relating to vaccine injuries is being eased.
Dr. Asim Alotra, a 47-year-old cardiologist, has been a vocal critic of various health-related issues, including the widespread use of statins and the COVID vaccine rollout, claiming that the mRNA vaccines have done more harm than good.
So there are still some good doctors out there, people willing to point out the flaws in the medical system.
I don't know anything else about Dr. Malotro than these two things, but that's...
Criticizing the COVID vaccine and the use of statins, both things that are just considered the standard of care.
Anytime they can inject you with a vaccine, they're going to want to.
And the statins, of course, are continually pushed for heart issues.
Gotta get you on statins.
They're very adamant with my dad about that.
We're gonna get you on a statin of some kind.
We need statins, stat.
Dr. Malotra, who is a trained cardiologist, initially promoted the COVID vaccine for elderly people on ITV's Good Morning Britain, February 2021, stating that vaccines are the safest way to restore trust and combat vaccine hesitancy.
As I said, I like that he's saying this now.
And the fact that he's willing to come out and say this, I appreciate, and shows there are still some people that can, you know, absorb new data and reform their opinions.
Everyone is wrong sometimes.
The important thing is learning and moving on.
It's having the integrity to see that.
And, of course, I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt and say maybe he didn't have, you know, maybe he only had the bad data that said this was worthwhile.
Now, of course, given the history of vaccines, I would never have advised anyone to get this.
I would never advise anyone to get any vaccine.
But when you're this immersed in propaganda, it's hard to not go with it.
But I do appreciate that he's coming out and condemning it now.
That's something.
Hopefully this has woken him to the fact that the medical industry, the one he's a part of, is a huge scam.
So Lil Cat 1980 says, unrepentance is weakness.
That's right.
You need to be able to repent.
Repent and admit when you were wrong, which this man seems to be doing.
Again, not saying you should immediately trust him with anything and everything, But it's good to see him doing this.
However, after his father's death, soon after receiving the vaccine, Dr. Malotra had a change of heart and began to investigate the data and consulting with experts in immunology, which led him to believe that the vaccine caused his father's death due to two critical narrowings in his heart discovered post-mortem.
And I do believe this goes to show that he thought he was doing the right thing.
His own father got the vaccine.
This isn't something where he was, you know, rules for thee, not for me.
I'm going to push this and say you should get it, but I'm not going to give it to myself or my family.
And it is truly heartbreaking that it took the death of his father for him to realize that.
He's also been open about his own health issues, including patches of psoriasis on his skin, which he suspects may be related to vaccine injury.
Although the Telegraph attempted to downplay his claim by quoting a study, they did at least print that Dr. Milatra says the harm caused by the COVID vaccine has been catastrophic without applying a slur such as conspiracy theorist or anti-vax.
Well, they consider it a slur.
I think those are kind of badges of honor.
But we know what they're meant to do in the mainstream opinion.
They label you these things and that gives the public the permission to tune out.
Anything you say, if you're a conspiracy theorist or your anti-vax is not worth listening to.
HUM2N or HUMAN 2.0.
The Telegraph noted that Dr. Milatre has been working as a private consultant at the Human Longevity Clinic, offering biohacking services and traditional medical advice, which would raise red flags with everyone.
Biohacking refers to a wide range of incremental changes a person can make to their bodies and lifestyle, from taking supplements and using wearable technology to monitor health to using implanted devices.
It seems Dr. Milatra still has some waking up to do when it comes to the Internet of Things, the Internet of Bodies, the Internet of Everything agenda.
As I was saying, he's good on this issue where he's pointing out what happened to his family and acknowledging the dangers of the COVID vaccine.
But don't immediately give anyone a pass.
Don't immediately just say, well, they're in the fold.
We can trust them on everything.
Everyone has blind spots.
Everyone has things they're going to be wrong on.
Of course, he was wrong about the COVID vaccine to his own and his father's and family's detriment.
But this is still hopeful.
The Telegraph printing that headline alone is something that would have been unthinkable just a couple of years ago.
They never would have done it.
They would have interviewed him and found ways to make him sound as crazy as possible.
They would have, as I said, put a label on him.
Conspiracy theorist, anti-vax.
They would have continued to savage him.
So again, it is because you all have been going out and having conversations and talking to people and pointing out the insanity.
It has had an impact.
It has had an effect.
So don't lose hope.
It's difficult and it's unpleasant to continue to have to have these conversations with people, but it's worth it.
You're having an impact.
You can hopefully keep people from getting the injection, which will potentially save their life.
So I want to thank you all for everything you've done.
I know it can seem, and it is a thankless job being the person at the get-together that will bring up a serious issue and potentially bring down the mood.
Or, you know, your friend just wants to have dinner, not want to talk about anything serious.
Maybe they just want to talk about the sports scores or the TV shows they're watching and you want to discuss what's going on with the vaccines or with government and can, as I said, bring down the mood or upset them.
But somebody's got to tell these people these things.
They're not going to just click onto an article from LifeSight or Children's Health Defense or any of these other things.
It really is having conversations with friends and family that makes the difference.
So again, keep going.
Keep doing it.
It's important and it's worthwhile.
We're going to take a quick break.
When we come back, we're going to look at what's going on with the sun setting of the late night shows.
So stay with us.
We'll be right back.
You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think, with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
Music by Ben Thede Welcome back, folks.
Appreciate you still being here with us.
As I said, we're going to look at what's going on with the late show.
And if you want to get more into the weeds about viruses and vaccines, my dad did an interview with doctors Sam and Mark Bailey about whether viruses even exist.
And so far, no one has yet been able to prove it.
So I encourage you to go check that out.
If you're able to have a conversation with someone and potentially get them to start seeing that vaccines aren't all they say they are, aren't all they're cracked up to be, that's a great next step.
So go check out that interview.
It's got a lot of really incredible information and goes on to expose more about the lies of the big pharma, big medicine.
Audi MRR.
Corporate media always report the truth after the fact.
They are part of the dumb on-purpose deception payroll.
Yeah.
Once they can no longer hide it, once they're forced to come out, they slow roll it.
Well, uh, you know, here's a little bit of truth here and there.
Defy tyrant 1776.
The entire convid scam is the biggest atrocity ever perpetrated on mankind, totally dwarfing all others.
And not one person involved will ever be held accountable.
This world is truly wicked.
From politicians who handed down evil edicts to the nurses who injected the poison, all should be severely punished.
I agree.
I agree that they should be and that they are not going to see any justice in this life.
But in the next life, there will be punishment.
They will be held to account for their actions.
Brian Deb McCartney, so sad so many fell for it.
We lost dear friends and relatives.
Yeah, a lot of people did.
A lot of people have friends or family that got the injection and have either been crippled or just passed away.
And it's really sad to see.
Syrian girl.
We shouldn't trust any medical professional's opinion 100%.
They are all brainwashed so intensely and it covers such a broad area of disease and healing.
Yeah.
The school system is set up to brainwash you.
It is set up to make you a good little parrot for propaganda.
And when you go to college, that is reinforced, especially when you go into one of these disciplines.
They have had control of the medical industrial complex for decades, and they will make sure that they're not going to let you out into the world until you have absorbed another 10 years worth of it.
Maluten Milankovic, they can't use the scientific method to prove they exist, as per Dr. Mark and Dr. Sam Bailey.
Great interview.
Yeah.
They're not able to isolate it.
They're not able to prove that viruses even exist.
It's just something they claim.
Well, we think this is there.
We think it's there, and as such, you should take this vaccine.
Isn't it wonderful how it's all built on these suppositions and lies?
Makes them a lot of money, though.
It makes for a great scheme.
But we're going to move on to what's going on with the late night shows.
We've covered a lot of very serious issues, and it's time for a little bit of fun.
Old media dying, waning.
CBS cancels Colbert.
Is Kimmel next?
Oh no, not Colbert.
Not Colbert, not one of their propagandists, isn't it?
So sad to see him go, isn't it?
Where was that?
Yeah, here it is.
Remember this?
Remember this insufferable piece of propaganda?
Well, we know you're going to be, you're going to be safe from COVID infecting you when you go out.
Just Colbert bobbing back and forth.
That blank expression on his face.
Look, he's got his little mug, his own mug.
And we will shoot by hundred vials, and we will spit by hundred.
Okay.
This is so difficult to endure.
Oh, he's eardrumming.
Isn't this funny?
Isn't this hilarious?
He's eardrumming and making faces, guys.
It's comedy.
It's comedy.
I thought he was supposed to be a comedian.
I've always heard people say there was a time when Colbert was funny.
Just like my entire life, I've grown up with people saying, oh man, SNL used to be funny.
You know, not for, you know, not this year, not last year, not 10 years ago, not 20 years ago.
But at one point, allegedly, it was funny.
And allegedly, at one point, Colbert was entertaining and funny.
I feel like I've heard that my entire life.
It used to be funny at some nebulous point in the past.
Yeah.
No one can pinpoint when.
No one can really show you any more than, like, oh, hey, look at this one clip of Chris Farley from 25, 30 years ago.
Remember when Norm McDonald hosted the news update?
That was funny.
Yeah, I'm sure it was funny at some point before our time.
Maybe.
I've heard rumors.
Someone has told me tales of funny late-night shows and SNL.
I've never seen it, though, Personally.
Problem is, the rumor of formerly funny can only carry it for so many decades.
Yeah, apparently, being funny once, one time, 30-something years ago, isn't enough to keep your show anymore.
Sorry, Colbert.
So, for the first time in history, Americans have stopped watching NBC, CBS TV, and ABC.
Reported commentator Bill O'Reilly.
Thursday, their viewing level has fallen below 20%.
Unheard of.
People are still watching Bill O'Reilly?
My goodness.
He was tired and uninteresting and abrasive and obnoxious 15 years ago.
I can't even imagine what he's like now.
And it's because they're boring and they're far left.
Those actually go hand in hand.
Being boring and far left.
The further left you go, the less you're able to say about anything.
Part of comedy is being slightly transgressive.
It's being willing to say things that might get you in trouble.
And being far left precludes that.
You're not allowed to.
The latest casualty of this legacy media collapse is notable.
CBS is canceling a late show with Stephen Colbert effective after the 2025-26 season.
The move will end what will have been a 33-year run that began with host David Letterman in 1993.
Of course.
Back in the days with David Letterman, and David Letterman could actually be funny.
He was not some smarmy lecturer, at least not that I remember, there to educate you and give you the latest talking points, what you needed to know to be a good little citizen in their perfect utopia.
The newsmaking announcement has prompted some observers to ask, is this the death of late-night genre?
Actually, it portends far more.
Little Ford Schoolhouse says, about 20 years ago, Colbert was funny.
See, once again, I'm hearing rumors of this.
I'm hearing rumors of a funny Colbert.
I've heard tales of it.
I've yet to see evidence.
I have a comment from Ted here saying the pathetic cheering Colbert did was just as pathetic as Trump's cheering for the vaccine.
We're supposed to believe they're on opposite sides, and when it comes to their own power, they are.
But when it comes to you, as we can see from this clip and from Trump's many other clips cheering the vaccine, they're partners to destroy your life.
Yeah.
The fake Hegelian dichotomy.
That's right.
They go out in the, as many, many people point out, it's wrestling.
They come out and they rail against each other in public, but they always work towards the same end goals behind the scenes.
The old media is slow but sure demise as new media comes to flower and inherit the former's mantle.
With media slash entertainment not being on our culture's periphery, but at its center, it's a sea change, at least as significant as the transition from horse and buggy to automobile.
Is it cancellation?
The funniest slate show happening in recent memory?
CBS got paid enough by Big Pharma to make even Stephen Colbert's shows profitable for a time.
How much do you think Trump got?
Yeah.
They got a huge cash injection.
Well, he's not funny.
He's not entertaining.
He's not worth having on, but he's shilling the propaganda.
And that's all you really need.
If you'll promote whatever it is they want you to, they'll keep you around for a while anyway.
You can see that in everything that is produced by Netflix or any one of these innumerable different streaming services.
Anytime they greenlight a project, it's loaded with the propaganda of the day.
I mean, look at what's happened with Disney.
Every single thing they produce now is a terrible piece of garbage.
Worse than the last one.
Loses them money, but it pushes their agenda.
It's all filled with girl bosses and just utter nonsense.
And no one likes them, but they keep making them.
No one should feel too sorry for Colbert.
After all, with an approximate $75 million net worth, he won't be missing too many meals.
It's clear, too, that many won't miss him.
For example, PJ Media's David Manny picked up where O'Reilly left off and wrote comedically.
Nearly all of us have that uncle who knows he is the funniest guy in the room.
Unfortunately, he has to explain his own jokes, wait for the laughs, and hear the crickets.
That is Stephen Colbert.
He's such a smarmy, droning nanny.
Just get your vaccine.
Take your Pfizer vaccine.
I'm the funny man.
I'm just here to have a good time and poke fun at conservatives because they're so silly.
They don't want to get the poison injection.
Look at how stupid they are.
You can rest assured that you're both funny and smart for listening to me and absorbing all of my stances.
For sure, the show genre is a long way from the legendary Johnny Carson tonight's show.
Host from 1962 to 92.
While a liberal man, Carson poked fun at both sides, made a legitimate effort to be politically neutral.
He treated all guests with respect too, as this 1975 interview with NX Governor Ronald Reagan evidences.
We've actually got a clip from Johnny Carson.
We're going to play that for you because it really does go to show how things have changed.
This is his attitude for his own show.
People say he'll never take a serious controversy.
Well, I have an answer to that.
I said, no, tell me the last time that Jack Benny, Red Skelton, Benny, comedian, used his show to do serious issues.
That's not what I'm there for.
Can't they see that?
But why do they think that just because you have a tonight show that you must deal in serious issues?
It's a danger.
It's a real danger.
Once you start that, you start to get that self-important feeling that what you say has great import.
And you know, strangely enough, you could use that show as a form.
You could sway people.
And I don't think you should as an entertainer.
You start to become self-important.
And we've seen that in spades from these people that host the late nights, whether it's Colbert or Jon Stewart or Trevor Noah, any of these other hacks, they stopped being funny.
They started pushing the agenda.
They became insufferable.
Even when someone disagrees with me, if they're being funny, that at least makes it like, oh, well, at least he's entertaining.
Even if he's shilling something I disagree with, if they're capable of being funny, you have to at least give them that.
But these people gave up on being funny.
It all became a smarmy lecture from an alleged comedian.
Those days are gone.
I myself never watched the late night scene and don't today.
I do, however, regularly visit someone who has only alphabet network access.
During these days, I often find myself accosted with ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live and therefore Jimmy Kimmel's jive.
It's Trump derangement syndrome on steroids with President Donald Trump living inside Kimmel's head rent-free.
This is part of the reason why Trump is so successful.
These people are so utterly unlikable.
They're so unfunny and despicable that since they hate Trump, you, not you in the audience, but people out there who watch these people begin to think, well, if they hate him, he can't be all bad.
He's upsetting these people that I despise.
These people that do nothing but mock me and my beliefs 24-7, who have spent their entire career enriching themselves, poking fun at family values, at Christianity, at the things that built this country.
And as such, Trump must stand for them, right?
Right?
Yeah, that's one thing you don't hear mentioned about these late-night people is they actually are somewhat effective propagandists for Trump.
Like, they have driven people to Trump from just how obnoxious they are.
Yeah.
People like Colbert, with their smug self-satisfaction sitting there, get your Pfizer vaccine as this atrocious, horrendous music plays and he sits there with that dumb look on his face.
How could that not make some people go, well, if he hates Donald Trump, I love him.
They have the effect of anyone that agrees with them gets to bask in this smug superiority.
Well, I agree with Stephen Colbert.
I agree with these people.
And people that dislike Colbert immediately run into the arms of whoever is pissing him off.
It's again just this dichotomy, the Galian dialectic.
This brings us back to O'Reilly.
Boring diagnosis.
Well, I don't like Joe Biden.
If all a host did every night was beat up on the poll, it would get as old as Biden really fast.
My attitude would be, okay, we agree, he's a blank, but can we talk about something else now?
It also would frankly smack a bullying.
They have one topic.
They have one thing they can talk about.
One thing they can try to poke fun at.
They're not going to actually attack him on any of the main issues, like the poison that he pushed.
They're just going to poke fun at him for whatever they can at the moment.
I think of Alec Baldwin's Donald Trump impersonation.
It wasn't funny.
It was...
The only thing that you could say is that, yeah, both Alec Baldwin and Donald Trump are insufferable.
But again, Alec Baldwin is this insufferable, bloviating, bullying, smug liberal.
And as such, when you see him do Donald Trump and you know what you know about Alec Baldwin, it makes you think, well, if he doesn't like Trump, I should.
What are the business models?
Is being predictable a recipe for comedy business success?
I think we can say affirmatively, no.
No, it's finally run its course.
Even with the monumental cash injections, Colbert is no longer profitable.
In fact, this next article is about that.
Report Stephen Colbert's late show operated at a $40 million loss for years.
$40 million loss.
Over and over again, losing $40 million.
But it was worth it because they were getting to shove their propaganda in people's face.
He might have been funny like 20 years ago.
You know, there's always a chance.
Maybe.
Maybe that was when he was last profitable.
SoloCat 1980, canceling late night show so that the CIA money can be channeled elsewhere, perhaps more into social media influencers.
That is the future.
People aren't watching late night anymore.
They're getting all their info on TikTok and YouTube and whatever else.
Twitter.
Nights of the Storm, Russell Brand, Tucker, Bongino, etc.
They want the market share and also push out the small guys.
Yeah.
All these Twitter celebrities.
Makes you wonder where they get their funding.
People like Cat Turd, one of the most boring, unfunny individuals that has ever lived, has, I don't even know how many followers on Twitter.
And this army of people that just retweet him and parrot whatever he says.
Makes you wonder how this unfunny, dim-witted loser reached this many people, doesn't it?
I have no proof.
I'm not insinuating anything.
I'm just asking questions.
How do these people with no qual not like degrees, but qualification in terms of being interesting or funny or having anything that would recommend them to be someone worth following or listening to get these massive viewer bases?
Again, Colbert's late show operated at a $40 million loss for years.
While the left is lamenting the loss of Stephen Colbert, their CBS late night chill, the network had already given Colbert years of operating at a huge loss for finally canceling him.
Well, it's worth it to them to bear that brunt, to pay that price.
You know, got your mockingbird media, and occasionally you're just going to have to lose $40 million to keep the propaganda running.
But now, I guess, as people are pointing out, there are other better ways that money can be spent.
Pezzovante, 1776.
Carson had all the big entertainers on his show.
Yeah, he was actually an entertainer.
He actually could be funny.
He actually enjoyed just talking about the entertainment side of things.
Knights of the Storm, they don't need to cancel people anymore.
They have a new strategy of injecting their people and pushing them with the algorithms.
Yeah.
You can astro-turf a celebrity a lot easier than you used to be able to.
And also, back to what Pesamantes was saying about how they used to have bigger entertainers before they became so political.
Now it's almost a political statement to go on one of these shows.
Yeah.
It's like Pedro Pascal.
I got his name right this time.
Every time I've seen an interview with him, it's just this cringing, obsequious liberal worldview leaking out.
Anytime he's anywhere, he seems to have to parrot whatever the current propaganda is.
Just this obsequious loser who does nothing but spew propaganda when he's on a show.
M. Sellers, SNL was funny in the 80s to early 90s.
Well, that explains.
It was before my time.
Nights of the Storm.
They literally have someone come out and train the audience before a show on how and when to laugh.
When I was in LA, they had people outside the studio to give free tickets so they could fill the seats.
There's a problem when you can't organically fill the audience, yeah.
You clap here, you go, ooh, there.
So it sounds like the audience is in line.
That's right, when Stephen Colbert says his next zinger about conservatives, remember to go, ooh.
The media has been so completely fake and controlled for years.
Cancellation is not exactly sudden or unjustified.
According to Puck's Matthew Balani, the top execs at CBS have been wrestling with the problem for months, and Colbert himself was alerted that there were cancellation plans coming.
As it turns out, he has been a huge drag on the network.
Balani noted that the late show has been losing about $40 million a year at least since the 2021 season when ad revenue plummeted and never began ticking back up.
Of course, that was after a massive cash injection to push the Trump shots.
The big question here is...
It's the 2021 season when the propaganda was cranked into overdrive.
I wonder, 2021 is probably when that insufferable clip we played for you came from.
It's around that time.
And I can't think of anyone who would sit through that willingly.
Even if you agree with the propaganda, even if you 110% are sold on it and are going to push it on your friends, are you really going to send that to someone?
Are you really going to cue that up and be like, Oh, I know what's going to convince my right-wing buddy to go get the vaccine.
It's going to be Colbert sitting there smugly, being unfunny.
The big question here is how long will it be before NBC and ABC follow suit and ditch their late-night shows, all of which are losing money.
The really crazy thing is that Stephen Colbert might just be the funniest of the late-night show hosts.
He just might be the most entertaining out of all of them.
Colbert has been losing $40 million a year, and the rest of the years aren't profitable either.
If that's the question, are they going to continue to pay $40 million a year for nothing so that they can propagandize people and presumably get more funding from Big Pharma?
It's truly amazing.
The one that I've always found the most insufferable is Trevor Noah.
I forget who he took over for.
It might have been Jon Stewart.
I've never watched any of these guys, but occasionally clips would pop up.
And Trevor Noah has never once been funny in his life.
His entire shtick is lecturing people about race and politics.
That's all he's ever done, as far as I can tell.
Just the second they put him on whatever show it was he hosted, they immediately lost viewership.
It plummeted, and they started losing money, leaking like a sieve.
They could not keep the viewer base.
Because, despite the fact that the host before him wasn't very funny either, he was such an insufferably smug jerk, people couldn't stand him.
Even people that agreed with leftist politics could not take it.
As I said, Colbert might have been the funniest of them.
And that does not bode well for all the others.
You've got to imagine they're sweating.
Just, oh no, if they're getting rid of Colbert, there's no way they're keeping me.
But, as I said, podcasts and other forms of media are on the rise.
This is from the New York Times.
Who's watching all these podcasts?
Well, people have stopped watching late night TV.
They've gotten sick of it.
They've gotten sick of the continual propaganda.
So they're moving towards podcasts.
An audio-only medium spawned.
A giant industry that is now largely focused on video.
In fact, you're listening to a podcast right now.
From left to right this past weekend with Theo Vaughn.
Lex Friedman podcast.
The Adam Friedland show.
The Joe Rogan experience.
Call Her Daddy.
Club Shay Shay.
These are all podcasts, by the way.
And I can honestly say I have never watched any of these.
I've never listened to them.
I've occasionally gotten served a clip from one or other of these, but I've never sought them out.
I've never gone...
But you couldn't escape him for a while.
He seems thoroughly astroturfed.
I do not believe that his growth was organic.
That's just my aside on this one.
The following are the runtimes of some recent episodes of several of YouTube's more popular podcasts.
This past weekend with Theo Vaughn, two hours and 14 minutes.
Club Shay Shay, two hours and 59 minutes.
The Sean Ryan Show, five hours and four minutes.
The Lex Friedman podcast, five hours and twenty minutes.
Oh my gosh.
I cannot imagine listening to Lex Friedman's voice for five hours and 20 minutes.
What a They don't feature particularly fancy camera work or flashy graphics or narratives.
All of them require some time commitment, typical of feature films, ball games, or marathon performances at art installations.
Yet they're growing.
It's a growth industry, apparently.
People have moved on.
This, again, as people were pointing out, is the future.
Knights of the Storm pointing out that they can probably get a better return for their CIA PSYOP dollar over in this area.
People like Joe Rogan have a larger audience than Colbert probably ever did and definitely ever will again.
It's kind of funny to see the New York Times asking, who's watching these podcasts?
Well, the people that aren't reading your garbage.
Exactly.
Who's watching all these?
The people, the viewership and readers that you've lost?
The people that used to watch Stephen Colbert or Jon Stewart or what's the red-headed guy's name?
I can never remember him.
All of them are Conan O'Brien.
Yeah, there we go.
I can never remember any of their names.
They're just meaningless prattle.
Well, I'm, for one, doing a little bit of a jig that Colbert is no longer on air.
Maybe I shouldn't be celebrating it, but when he's been so unfunny, so biased, so hateful for so many years, I'm not going to shed any tears over him losing his multi-million dollar contract.
The damage he's done, the damage all of these late night show hosts, is probably incalculable.
The amount of propaganda they pushed is just unbelievable.
And even in my mind, remains the question, are people sick of it or are they just, again, moving on to greener pastures?
Are they just tired of paying for the subscription when they can get some entertainment on YouTube for free?
Well, either way, I am happy to see him go.
I have been so sick of Stephen Colbert for so many years.
Part of it is I love Lord of the Rings.
I love J.R.R. Tolkien's world that he's created.
And Colbert routinely trots out little Lord of the Rings fun facts, preening over the fact he's read The Silverillion.
Oh, look, I know these facts.
Like, he doesn't have a team of writers putting everything together for him.
He has made liking Lord of the Rings cringe.
No, he's not capable of that.
But you can be lumped in with him if you talk about it, which I object to, and I object to strongly.
Well, we're going to take a quick break.
When we come back, we're going to look at the lawsuits that are going on back and forth.
So stay with us, folks.
We'll be right back.
Liberty.
It's your move.
And now, the David Knight Show.
Welcome back, folks.
Tunnel Lord1337 says, Most media is just ran by algorithms that want to steer a person into a certain direction.
It's honestly why people should use the Tor browser so the algorithms don't artificially change the user.
Yeah.
They'll feed you more and more of what you want to hear.
It can drastically reinforce whatever you believe.
It's the same thing we see with ChatGPT feeding these people this narrative that everything they want to do is correct.
I saw this tweet the other day where this guy told ChatGPT, I cheated on my wife after she came home from a 12-hour shift because she didn't make me dinner.
And I don't believe this is real, but this is just what he said to see what ChatGPT would say.
And ChatGPT basically justified his actions to him.
Well, you weren't feeling seen, you weren't feeling heard, she wasn't, you know, attending to your needs.
Such, it wasn't right what you did, but you did it from a place of hurt, you know?
Basically justifying this alleged, you know, cheating that happened.
ChatGPT wants to justify whatever you're doing, wants to give you an out, wants to feed into your own delusions.
It's meant to sit there and just reinforce whatever you believe.
It's a product, and a product that pushes back on its user isn't going to have too many users in the end.
Saw a great comment about that.
Somewhere, the dumbest person in the world is being told that they're so smart and brilliant by an AI.
That's right.
Horrifying.
The dumbest person you know is being gaslit by AI to believe they're a super genius.
It's like I just remember that episode of Looney Tunes where Wily Coyote just continues to get blown up by his own devices, but he keeps saying, Wily Coyote, super genius, to himself over and over again.
But now you don't have to say it to yourself.
You can have an AI tell you what a genius you are.
How smart, how wonderful, how perfect, how all your actions are justified.
Audi MRR, all those bluejack podcasters are government operatives.
I still can't believe people trust Russell Brand, who literally advocated a one-world system on his podcast.
Yeah.
It was really sad to see so many Christians immediately just fall in behind him.
Well, he's made a profession, so we should listen to him and trust him now.
And again, I want to say this.
When a celebrity makes a profession of faith, pray for them.
Pray that it's true and correct, but don't immediately begin to trust them and turn to them for any kind of spiritual advice.
They are not, at best, they are new Christians with, you know, very little knowledge of what's going on, not to be turned to for theology.
Someone that could be mentored by someone in a church, by someone with knowledge, but not someone to get your knowledge from.
So pray for them.
Keep them in your prayers.
But do not immediately go, ah, yes, a new believer, someone with experiences that I can turn to.
Zaksov, Voxaz, their audience died from the jabs.
That's right.
The COVID jabs that Colbert shilled took out his audience.
He was too effective.
When you kill your audience, you can't make any more money.
That's right.
They got to turn to new ways.
And all those podcasts that were on that list, I just, I don't understand how people can watch them.
I find all the clips I've seen of them rather dull.
And Theo Vaughan, I believe, is a comedian.
I've seen a couple of clips of him here and there where he's moderately funny, but nothing that would make me want to watch him for a longer period of time.
And the most heinous one on that list, I believe, is Call Her Daddy.
It's basically just these two, I don't know if there's a polite way to say this, whores, discussing their sex life and the gross things they get up to.
I cannot believe there's an audience for these people.
But such are the times we live in.
It's, ah...
What else is there to say?
We're going to move on to the lawsuits now.
I'm going to perhaps introduce you to a new term you haven't heard before.
But on the internet space, there's something called a lawsuit, LOL, where internet personalities get into disputes and eventually leads to legal action.
Normally, it's over bruised egos and hurt feelings and doesn't do anything but destroy both parties.
And as such, it's good entertainment for people that want to sit back and watch idiots fight.
And as such, the lawsuit was born LOL.
And that's how I kind of see these lawsuits flying back and forth.
With Trump, the Wall Street Journal, James Gunn, D.C., Warner Brothers.
They're all suing each other over different things.
And this would be funny.
It'd be entertaining to sit back and watch these idiots fight if they weren't going to set terrible precedents for freedom of speech and fair use.
False, malicious, defamatory.
Trump demands unsealing of Epstein files, threatens lawsuit after the Wall Street Journal hit piece.
Donald Trump set notorious sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein a body birthday letter with a drawing of a naked woman.
An acknowledgement that the two have certain things in common, and a wish for every day to be another wonderful secret.
What could he mean by that?
What wonderful secrets could Jeffrey Epstein have been hiding?
What wonderful secret does Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump have in common?
Really makes you wonder.
I, for one, don't think the secrets are wonderful.
I think they're probably horrifying and disgusting.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday evening citing documents that its reporters had reviewed.
Later on Thursday evening, Trump announced that he directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue the release of grand jury testimony from Epstein's prosecution in response to the ridiculous amount of publicity the case is receiving.
Of course, this is, again, just grand jury testimony.
He's not asking her to release the list.
He's simply saying the grand jury testimony.
Who knows what's in that if it's anything worthwhile?
Trump denies he had anything to do with a letter.
This is not me.
This is a fake thing.
It's a fake Wall Street Journal story, Trump told the journal in a Tuesday evening interview.
I never wrote a picture in my life.
I don't draw pictures of women.
It's not my language.
It's not my words.
Well, I don't know how to tell you this, Donald, but pictures aren't words, despite the saying pictures are worth a thousand words.
They're not actually words themselves.
I never wrote a picture in my life.
The thing is, they have, allegedly, an old lever-bound book of notes from a bunch of famous people, Donald Trump being one of the notes in this Physical thing.
It should be pretty easy to prove.
Yeah, where he drew more pictures, sort of similar.
Yeah, it was sold at auction, by the way.
So this thing that doesn't exist, apparently, not only existed, but was worth enough to be sold.
Even if the letter is authentic, it's far from conclusive that Trump's imagery and celebration of secrets referred to illegal conduct with underage females.
They're right, you know, it's not 100% proof.
It's not exactly him saying, boy, I sure did have a good time on your island, Jeffrey.
Please invite me back over again for some more underage prostitutes.
He didn't say that.
It's not proof.
He could have been going to the island for fishing.
A causation does not equal correlation.
Exactly.
Nonetheless, the story compounds the sustained controversy over the president's declarations that the FBI's Epstein files are a Democrat hoax and his coalition splitting characterization that conservatives who are pressing for the release of more Epstein documents are weaklings who haven't learned their lesson.
Now, I wonder what lesson they're learning right now.
They should be learning the lesson that this guy was never on their side, that he was always part of the swamp, that he was always simply another one of these elites, elites, quote unquote, that was involved in these heinous acts.
The journal said it reviewed the letter, but did not publish an image of it.
According to the report, the letter was one of many contained in a leatherbound book compiled in 2003 by since convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell.
The book was a gift to celebrate Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday.
Others who submitted letters include billionaire Leslie Wexner, ooh, of course, Leslie Wexner being the victorious secret guy, and attorney, Alan Dershowitz.
Good old Dershowitz, the pedophile defender himself, the man who's claiming that he's seen these documents and, you know, just he can't, he can't tell you what's on it because he's being barred by judicial injunction or something like that.
And again, if that's the case, if it's as simple as he's going to get in legal trouble, we'll tell you what.
Why doesn't the government come out and say, you tell us what's on there and we'll pardon you?
We issue a pardon beforehand, a preemptive pardon, for what you're about to tell us.
Wes Wexner, the pedophile defender and likely pedophile defender.
laughter *laughs* Baudiness was a reoccurring but not necessarily universal theme among the many letters in the book.
A letter attributed to Trump features the outline of a nude woman drawn with heavy marker, with arcs depicting breasts and a squiggly Donald signature positioned to illustrate the woman's uh pubic hair.
Classy, Donald.
Within that frame of the female figure, the letter features typewritten text creatively written in the fashion of an audio or video script.
Voiceover There must be more to life than having everything.
Donald?
Yes, there is, but I won't tell you what it is.
Jeffrey, nor will I, since I also know what it is.
Donald, we have certain things in common, Jeffrey.
Jeffrey.
Yes, we do, come to think of it.
Donald Enigmas never age.
Have you noticed that?
Jeffrey.
As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.
Donald, a pal is a wonderful thing.
Happy birthday, and may every day be another wonderful secret.
Wow.
Such good friends.
Such wonderful friends they were.
If only we could all have such a nice friendship in our life.
Someone that shares our interests.
How much of these nudge, nudge, wink, wink communications with someone who supplies underaged prostitutes to billionaires do you need before you start to suspect they were?
This is this is about as obvious as they can make it without just flat out saying it.
Just, oh, there's a secret to life.
I won't tell you what it is.
You know, if you're a billionaire that has everything, what more could you want?
Certain enigmas that never age.
Uh-huh.
It's this is this is something they would put in one of those cheesy movies where you find out the billionaire is hunting people for sport on his island.
You know?
Oh, yes, there's certain things that you just what can you do when you have everything?
Hmm.
This is something a villain would say in a monologue.
In a 2002 interview with Newark Magazine, Trump acknowledged Epstein's affinity for younger women.
I've known Jeff for 15 years.
Terrific guy.
He's a lot of fun to be with.
It was even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.
No doubt about it, Jeffrey enjoys his social life.
On the younger side Donald Trump willing to admit that he's known Jeff for 15 years.
Admit that he knows that Jeffrey likes beautiful women on the younger side.
Not anymore.
No, I didn't know that man.
We weren't friends.
We never had much contact.
Ignore the Epstein files.
That's a Democrat hoax.
After the story was published, Trump lashed out via Truth Social, calling the journal a disgusting and filthy rag for publishing a false, malicious, and defamatory story.
Trump wrote that he'd contacted journal owner Rupert Murdoch, who stated that he would take care of it, but obviously did not have the power to do so.
Trump also argued that if there were any truth to suggestions that he was guilty of criminal sexual conduct facilitated by Epstein, radical left lunatics like Hillary Clinton, former CIA director John Brennan, and former FBI director James Comey wouldn't have sat on it through three elections.
Of course, unless they were equally guilty, unless this is a mutually assured destruction scenario.
This stuff is radioactive.
It's poison.
It's not going to discriminate who it takes out.
A real flaw in that logic.
Surely people, like Dershowitz, would say if I were a pedophile.
Exactly.
This stuff cannot be used by anyone in the power structure because the power structure is fully implicated.
They're owned by the people that have the info.
Surely these people that would be implicated themselves would be altruistic and go down with a ship, right?
It's completely ridiculous.
Why wouldn't they use it?
There's an obvious answer.
According to Trump, his friendship with Epstein ended sometime around 2004 after a mutual acrimony arose from a bidding war between the two for a Palm Beach property.
A war Trump won.
That's right.
A fallout over some property.
It's sad to see a friendship like this go up in flames.
Billionaires just can't get along, you know, whether it's Donald Trump and Elon Musk or Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, these billionaires that are just constantly fighting with each other.
And of course, it seems like Donald Trump was the man who ratted Jeffrey Epstein out, got very upset with him and decided, you know what?
I think I'm going to go tell the police.
And that's when Epstein got in trouble the first time and then got his sweetheart deal where Acosta was told, don't do anything to this guy.
He's intelligence.
In 2008, Epstein pled guilty to state charges of procuring a minor for prostitution but was controversially allowed to enter a non-prosecution agreement that spared him and others from federal charges.
That's right.
Like I said, Alex Acosta worked with him.
Was told, don't touch this guy.
Don't investigate any further.
He is intelligence.
Don't mess with him.
We'll do the bare minimum, and then we're letting him back out.
That's right.
We should ask Alex Acosta what's going on.
Maybe he's got some more info.
Do they happen to tell you which intelligence agency he was working for?
Trump sues Rupert Murdoch, Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones over hit piece.
That's right.
It's a $10 billion lawsuit.
$10 billion.
The most expensive lawsuit in history.
President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit against News Corp owner Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones and Company Inc., and several reporters after the Wall Street Journal published a hit piece alleging that Trump had sent a lewd letter to convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday.
$10 billion.
Just lawsuits back and forth.
DC, James Gunn, Warner Brothers, I think it's a billion dollars they're trying to sue Trump for his Superman imagery.
Yeah, DC took out a billion-dollar frivolous lawsuit against Trump, so Trump responded by taking out his own $10 billion frivolous lawsuit.
He's going to be $9 billion in the black.
It's the art of the deal.
Exactly.
I'm going to have the biggest frivolous lawsuit.
James Gunn thinks he's got a big one, but mine's going to be bigger.
I promise you.
No one's ever seen a frivolous lawsuit like this before.
CNN's Haunting, Trump will have to testify.
No holds barred for Wall Street Journal lawsuit.
That's right.
He's going to have to get up on the stand.
Host Jake Tapper said, so, Ellie, what would discovery look like?
I mean, imagine if the Wall Street Journal, News Corp, and Rupert Murdoch are going to mount any sort of defense, they're going to want to know everything they can about President Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
You're going to seek possession or introduction as evidence.
Whatever his birthday book is, I mean, might not end up just dredging up a lot of stuff Trump doesn't want to talk about anyway.
That's right.
Which means, personally, I don't think this is going to move forward.
I think this was some kind of scare tactic.
And I doubt we'll see this actually see trial.
I doubt Donald Trump wants any of this actually thoroughly examined.
Hoenig said, I'm not so sure Donald Trump has fully thought this one through.
Because you showed at the beginning of the show his very recent social media post where he said, oh, I look forward to deposing Rupert Murdoch under oath.
That should be fascinating.
Well, guess who else will have to testify under oath at a deposition?
The plaintiff in this case, the person who's suing Donald John Trump.
Do you really think he wants to get up there and be cross-examined?
Have to give into evidence everything that he's got about Jeffrey Epstein?
It would be hilarious if Trump is finally taken down by discovery from a frivolous lawsuit that he took out to silence people that were posting political articles about him that were purely factual.
Yeah, I see this more as his once more acting without thinking, the way he responds emotionally and over the top before backing off and realizing, ah, that wasn't such a good idea.
Audi MRR, I'm sure that Biden is sighing in relief that he is no longer the only president who's a pedo.
Trump's Epstein blunders have done permanent damage to his political viability.
It truly is amazing that the right was so willing and vociferous in their calling out Joe Biden's extremely strange and off-putting behaviors when it comes to children.
But Donald Trump's obvious connections to Jeffrey Epstein, no interest.
They don't care.
They don't want to hear about it.
Joe Biden sniffing hair?
Oh yeah, we're going to talk about that forever.
And it should be pointed out and should be questioned.
It should be again acknowledged that our country is run by a cabal of evil, disgusting pedophiles.
But this unwillingness to acknowledge that Donald Trump may be in that cabal.
And I think obviously so.
Bill Clinton wrote warm and gushing letters for Epstein's 50th birthday.
That's right.
Bill Clinton.
The former US president was one of hundreds who contributed to a heavy, leather bound, gold embossed album of letters that Epstein's ex-lover, Ghislaine Maxwell, took more than a year to compile leading up to the landmark date.
That's right.
Donald Trump and Bill Clinton both wishing the same guy happy birthday.
Really makes you wonder.
And of course, we saw the Clintons at the wedding for was it Trump's daughter?
Was it I believe it was his daughter?
Said, oh, I paid them to be there,'cause that's how business is done.
But Trump has just always been a New York Democrat.
He's always been involved in those circles.
He even said, was it on Oprah?
That if I was ever going to run, I would run as a Republican because they're easier to fool if memory serves.
I don't think that's a direct quote, but it's paraphrasing.
He outlined his plan.
He told people, Yeah, I'm going to fool those conservatives.
And here we are.
This is from Business Insider.
Trump files suit against Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones, over Epstein, birthday letter.
Of course.
You said it's $10 billion against Wall Street.
And he's being sued for $1 billion.
It's frivolous lawsuits back and forth.
And it's going to do more to erode free speech.
It's going to do more to shut down fair use.
Well, we're going to take a quick break.
So stay with us, folks.
We'll be right back.
You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Wait a minute.
Where am I?
Sorry, Jefferson.
The scoundrels who put America on central bank fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
Despicable.
This is outrageous.
Washington.
I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve Monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Well, there is a coin they can't control.
One that isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed up.
The all-new David Knight Show commemorative coin.
Now patriots can support a show that won't sell out with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
They say money talks, and this coin has something worth listening to.
The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
Welcome back, folks.
I meant to play this while I was talking about Epstein and Trump.
This is actually Epstein's ex-girlfriend talking about it.
So let's play that now before we move on to the next topic, because it's worth seeing.
Stacey, thank you so much for joining us tonight.
As you know, Epstein is dominating the news once again, and his relationship with Trump is under.
While you were dating Epstein, can you tell us how close these two men were?
They were best friends.
You know, I dated Jeffrey for a period of more or less, I think about four or five months.
And the only friend that he would mention every time we saw each other or had a phone conversation was Donald.
And he would share a lot of anecdotes.
I have plenty of anecdotes.
And yeah, they were very close and they were up to no good.
They were very close and they were up to no good.
I believe we're on that.
I think up to no good is probably underselling it a little.
Epstein.
Epstein's ex-girlfriend.
Yeah, the only person that he would always talk about was Donald Trump.
They were such good buddies.
Just more and more.
Just documentation of the relationship they had.
They continually had pictures of themselves together.
They were seen on video.
There's that one where you can even see Donald and Jeff both leering at women together.
It seems they shared a taste for women.
Nothing to see here, folks.
Move along.
It's a Democrat hoax.
You're an idiot if you want the information about it.
Donald Trump.
It seems the president doth protest too much.
Audi MRR, Trump wants us to believe that Jeffrey Epstein pled guilty to a hoax.
That's right.
Yeah, there's nothing to see here, but sure, I'll plead guilty.
Why not?
Whatever you say.
We're now going to talk about the grooming that's going on in public schools.
What's going on with, well, here's the headline.
Documents Biden, A.G., and White House conspired to chill local parents' school board protests.
This is by Lowell Cawfield.
Damning revelations in federal documents obtained by a conservative watchdog group show the Biden administration's Justice Department sought a federal hook so they could investigate and criminally charge parents protesting school policies related to COVID, transgenderism, critical race theory, and other issues.
That's right.
If you're going to protest this, we're going to find some way to punish you for it.
Remember, they were having the FBI investigate parents.
You're a domestic terrorist.
If you question what the schools are going to teach your kids, you're going to object to this propaganda?
Well, can't have that.
We need some way to punish you for that.
You're going to protest over the COVID propaganda, the transgender propaganda?
Critical race theory.
You don't like that we're telling your white children that they're to blame for all the evils of the world?
You don't like that we're going to gaslight your son or daughter into believing that they were born in the wrong body and they should take hormones or mutilate themselves?
Uh-uh, can't have that.
Curry career attorneys in the DOJ argued in the release correspondence that such a move was legally baseless and would trample the First Amendment rights of parents.
We've actually got some clips from good old Gavin Newsom himself.
So let's take a look at that, shall we?
Let's see what Mr. Newsom has to say for himself.
You know, the state can come in and basically take your kid if you're against gender-affirming care.
There's some nuanced language around that.
Yeah, there's some nuanced language around that as he twiddles his fingers.
You noticed that, did you?
Ah, well, the way he dances around the question.
He has no answer to give.
He's desperate to avoid it, because on one hand, he has to appease the absurd LGBT mob that is his base.
But he knows if he comes out and says exactly what they want, people are going to freak out.
Let's take a look at this other clip from Newsom here.
What about for your values?
I mean, is eight years old too young?
I mean, Newsom doesn't have any values.
Now that I have a nine-year-old, just became nine.
Come on, man.
I get it.
I get it.
Come on, man.
So those are legit.
Legit.
It's interesting, just the issue of age, the issue of age.
It's interesting.
As I, and as someone that's been on equality, broadly, LGBT rights, particularly gay marriage, the trans issue for me is also novel.
It's over the last few years.
I'm trying to understand as much as anyone else.
Whole pronoun thing, trying to understand all of that.
Oh, man.
You know, that was like the hell.
I mean, all that stuff.
I get it.
All that stuff.
I get it, man.
This, you know, like the pronoun thing.
I get it, man.
He can't come out and say anything.
Because no matter what he does, he's going to offend somebody.
He's going to make somebody upset.
And his entire base in California is basically made up of lunatics.
It's an entire state of people that have gone off the deep end.
But if he has any broader hopes of furthering his political career, if he wants to run for president, he can't come out and be too insane.
Yeah, like, you know, oh, that age thing.
That's a real interesting question.
That's an interesting question you posed.
Wow, that's something I'm trying to understand too, man.
So, can't get a straight answer out of Gavin Newsom.
The government documents obtained by America First Legal conclusively prove a memo from former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland mobilized the full force of the federal government's firepower against concerned parents, not to protect schools, but to silence dissent.
Ensuing investigation was politically orchestrated and coordinated with the Biden White House.
America First Legal charged Friday.
That's right.
You care about your kids?
You don't want them to be gaslit into insanity?
Well, too bad.
The government's going to come down on you with the force of a neutron bomb.
We'll declare you a domestic terrorist.
We'll unleash the FBI on you.
The AFL in an extensive release on its website reported, these never-before-seen documents uncovered only because of AFL's relentless efforts over the past three and a half years expose not only the Biden White House's involvement in pushing a weaponized DOJ, but also strong dissent from careers within the Department Civil Rights Division.
Warned that there was no federal authority or legal basis to target these parents in the first place because their speech is protected by the First Amendment.
You want to exercise your rights to protest?
No, not when it comes to objecting to grooming kids.
Not when it comes to objecting to them being gaslit about COVID propaganda and turned into little basket cases that are afraid to go outside, that are going to have stunted development.
But if you want to, you know, say, burn down some shops and loot some clothing stores, I suppose that's all right.
I suppose that's fine.
But if you care about your kids, can't have that.
You're not allowed.
You're not allowed to come against our bastions of propaganda, our ivory towers.
In a letter obtained by AFL, Kevin Chambers, an aide to the Attorney General, wrote to a colleague on October 1st, 2021, we're aware the challenge here is finding a federal hook, but the White House has been in touch about whether we can assist in some form or fashion.
That's right.
We're aware.
We're trying to find that hook.
We're trying to find some cover of law to do what we want to do to punish these parents for caring about their children.
We've actually got a video here about the importance of parents, how much of a difference it makes.
I, for one, of course, am here to say that you just shouldn't put your kids in government schools at all.
Whether they come out and say, yeah, you know what?
Fine, we'll get rid of all this trainy propaganda, all of this climate change nonsense, critical race theory is out the door.
You still shouldn't turn them over to these people.
You should still be the one to educate your children.
Let's take a look at the impact that a parent can have on not just their kids, but generations to come.
What a difference it can make depending on who that parent is and what they do.
This guy in 1870 was helping out in a prison.
He found that 42 inmates all traced back to the same great-great-grandfather.
So he had to figure out what happened.
So he dove in and did a deep study.
He found that it traced all the way back to a guy in New York named Max Jukes.
He was a bum, a thug, and a womanizer.
He had 11 kids with a bunch of different women and a crazy life.
And his stats over the five generations are insane.
310 people died as paupers, 400 drunks, 190 prostitutes, 150 more criminals, and seven murderers.
But wait, it gets even crazier.
Then he compared it to another family at the exact same time.
His name was Jonathan Edwards.
Also had almost a dozen kids.
And he lived right near him.
He was a teacher and he was a pastor.
And here is their next five generations.
13 college presidents, 65 college professors, 75 military leaders, 80 public servants, 60 authors, 60 doctors, 30 judges, 100 more pastors, 100 lawyers, 3 U.S. senators, and a U.S. vice president.
Parents do not realize that the decisions that they make today have ripple effects for generations to come.
It's more about what we leave in our kids than to them.
That's right.
Do you really want that much influence over the future generations, your family's future generations, left in the hands of these people in public schools?
Because make no mistake, they're the ones that are going to have the most influence over them.
When you turn your kids over to them for eight hours a day and you get to see them for a few hours after work, between when they're doing their homework and when they're doing activities for school or hanging out with friends or playing video games or watching TV or whatever else they're doing, between the time that you get home and you get to shower and take some time for yourself or cook dinner, how much time are you really going to get to spend with them?
How much influence are you going to get to have on their life compared to their peers who are going to be absorbing the public school propaganda and the teachers?
Everyone in the public school.
Are you going to be able to counteract eight hours worth of propaganda with that little bit of time you will get to spend with them?
I don't think so.
I really don't think so.
I've known quite a few kids that I grew up with.
I went to church that, you know, believed all the same things that we did generally growing up.
But they went to public school or even private school and have now just completely walked away from the church.
They've embraced all of the modern leftist talking points because that's what they were told.
That's what they were given.
That's where the majority of the influence came from.
Their parents saw them for a few hours during the evening and maybe, you know, got to spend the summer with them when they weren't hanging out with friends, when they weren't busy doing stuff.
It wasn't enough.
It wasn't enough simply to give them a couple of hours here and there of just hangout time.
And I am truly saddened to see some of my friends the way they turned out.
You know, they're still nice people.
I still like them.
But they've walked away from all the things that their parents wanted for them.
And I can't imagine the kind of pain that brings them.
Got comments.
Audi MRR, Trump wants us to...
Dougda, 007.
Gavin Newsom comes across as a mob boss or like a Bond super villain.
Yeah.
like a very inarticulate Bond villain.
Do you expect me...
you expect me to cry.
No, I expect you to...
You know, you might do something, I guess.
KWD68, is your nine-year-old a boy or a girl or both, Gavin?
He might not have an answer for that.
You know, it's up to them, really, I guess.
Once they decide, they can make that choice for themselves.
You know, whatever they say, they're making the rules here.
Brian DebmcCartney, and homework is just to keep them busy to not have time with them.
Lance and I had homework, but that's because all our schoolwork was homework because we were at home.
We didn't have a tremendous amount of work to do.
My parents gave us some stuff to make sure that we understood and were keeping on track with math and reading and history.
But they didn't load us down with stuff.
They didn't, you know, keep us busy for eight to nine hours a day with this.
It was enough so that we learned and then we got to go outside and ride our bikes, run around in the woods, have fun, play with the dog, all that kind of stuff.
The type of thing that you would expect a child to do.
Again, another thing that is utterly ridiculous is just how willing to medicate children people are nowadays.
Hey, your son, you know, he's got a lot of energy, and that's a bad thing.
He's disruptive in class when this Marxist feminist is lecturing him about how evil he is for being white.
So we're going to put him on Riddlin.
We're going to neuter his brain.
We're going to castrate his energy.
Make sure that he's just going to sit there and absorb whatever is said in front of him.
It's a problem that he wants to go be a kid.
What do you mean the child doesn't want to sit there for eight hours a day and be lectured?
Doug to 007.
I often wonder how I survived public school spending the majority of time at school can be really harmful with bad influences coming from your peers.
Yeah, it truly is.
I mean, this is coming from someone whose views are from outside the system.
I've never been to a public school, never had anything to do with it, but it seems like it's largely a lord of the flies scenario.
There's, you know, what, hundreds, thousands potentially of kids in these school systems, and a very minimum number of adults to keep them in line.
That's assuming the adults even are willing to.
So they're largely just dependent upon the mercy of their peers.
And of course, children have to be taught mercy.
They have to be guided.
They're not being given morals.
They're not being given codes of conduct and ethics.
They're Simply being given useless facts.
Mama C. 1996, my brother's kids raised the same beliefs as mine, but went to government school, living like the devil.
My kids homeschooled, serving the Lord.
Yeah.
That's.
I'm sorry to hear that, but that is the way it goes.
The government schools, again, you turn your kids over to them for eight hours a day.
You can't counteract that with a little bit of time you have between cooking dinner, between whatever else you have going on in the day.
You get, what, two to three hours with them at most?
And you're not going to want to spend that entire two to three hours sitting there going over what they were taught and explaining how this is wrong, this is propaganda.
You're not going to be able to do it.
You have to take that on for yourself.
You have to be willing to teach them yourself.
We've known a lot of families that homeschooled their kids despite the economic hardship it led to.
That they could have made a lot more money.
They could have lived in a nicer house, had newer cars, if they had just sent the kids off to school and had both parents working.
But they prioritized the fact that they wanted their children to actually be taught and grow up the way they wanted them to.
They didn't want to entrust that to the public school systems.
And it did come with struggle.
It did come with sacrifice.
It does limit the things you can do.
It does mean that maybe you're not going to get to go to Disney World or buy that new car or get a bigger house.
Things may be more difficult.
But just what's more important?
Is it more important to, again, get a nicer car, a nicer house, those trips?
Or is it more important to have your kids trained up knowing the Bible, knowing the Lord, not being fed this insane propaganda?
New bill would force homeschools to teach government propaganda.
As more families free from increasingly extreme public education, New Jersey lawmakers have a radical new bill to force homeschool parents to teach their children using the same dumbed-down standards and outrageous ideologies as government schools.
*laughs*
If they can't force you to put your kids in school, they're going to try to force you to teach the same garbage that they would learn there.
Critics, and while AI tools and that sort of thing might wind up being helpful for homeschooling, it is also a way in which they can push their agenda into government into homeschools if they have tools that they put forward for that sort of thing.
Yeah.
The AI is only ever going to feed back what it has been fed into it.
Garbage in, garbage out.
Critics, though, are speaking out and vowing to fight back.
In fact, the politically powerful homeschooling community is already developing a plan to stop the bill and punish those seeking to infringe on parental rights, education, freedom, and other key liberties.
These people cannot stop going after children.
These people understand the importance of getting the kids.
They understand that if they can feed this propaganda into them when they're too young to be able to effectively question it, before critical thinking has really developed, it'll probably stick with them for life.
I've said it before, you can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.
If they just take this in before they're able to really think about it, chances are it's part of the bedrock of their ideologies.
It's snuck past the firewall.
It got in before there was any defense systems.
And as such, it's free from scrutiny.
And anything that builds upon that is going to be largely free from scrutiny as well.
It's also worth noting that they have to point to things like, oh, homeschoolers aren't getting enough education on stuff like climate change and race theory and whatnot, because they can't point to test scores.
If they could, they would be championing that from the rooftops.
Yeah, homeschoolers routinely outperform public schoolers when it comes to just about everything, as far as I'm aware.
I mean, we knew kids that were doing calculus when they were like 13.
You know, known as a simple they have to still come at the schools.
They have to put their own stuff into this because it's never about teaching.
It's about propagandizing.
It's about instilling a worldview.
No, you're going to teach your kids about the LGBT.
You're going to explain to them how, actually, maybe, you know, if he's a boy, he's actually a girl.
Or the opposite.
And, of course, you've got to have critical race theory.
You've got to teach your white children that they're the devil and they need to be punished for it.
Known as Assembly Bill 5825 or AB 5825, the measure would force home educators to register with the government and hand over large amounts of private information.
Even more alarming, though, is that they would have to align their curriculum and standards with the state's programs.
In addition to the letter containing private information on the child and family, the bill states that the parent or guardian shall submit a copy of the curriculum that will be utilized in the home education program, which shall be aligned with the New Jersey student learning standards.
That's right, you've got to align it with the standards the government sets.
I know you wanted to homeschool your kids because you wanted to teach them your own morals.
You wanted to pass down what your family believes, but too bad.
Breaks our hearts too that abortion will be taught as a solution to pregnancy, and both anal sex and oral sex included in discussions regarding factors that contribute to making healthy decisions about sex, she said, calling the indoctrination an assault on our deeply held religious faith.
That's right, you're going to teach their sex ed courses.
It's going to be loaded down with all the perversions that have come in over the years.
You can't have autonomy with your children.
You can't be trusted to teach them.
You need the government to watch over you.
Musk announces plans to create a kid-friendly AI app.
Isn't that wonderful?
AI app for the kids.
It's for the kids.
It's great.
It's wonderful.
From the guy that just did the weird porn bot for Grok.
The guy that brought you the AI whore waifu will now make a kid-friendly AI app.
I'm sure this won't funnel them into destructive patterns of behavior.
Yeah, this is the guy you want programming your child's babysitter, which itself is a ridiculous concept.
Yeah.
The guy that has basically abandoned his children, the guy that is not a father, the guy who has a transgender son that now thinks he's a daughter or vice versa.
I can't remember.
But this is the guy you want programming your kid-friendly AI app.
That's the guy.
Now, of course, you don't want a kid-friendly AI app in the first place, but if you were to want one, you wouldn't want Elon Musk to do it for you.
The whole premise is absurd.
The idea that you want to turn your children over to AI is horrifying to me.
It seems like it's an even worse idea than putting them in front of the computer and letting them watch YouTube or TikTok or whatever it is that they're into for eight hours a day.
Nights of the Storm, I'm looking up homeschool options for JJ.
I found a great resource, but a lot of their lessons are on video.
I'm not sure if I want him being trained to get all his info from a screen.
It's very difficult these days.
Well, a good thing to do is watch the videos with them and discuss it between the two of you.
Yeah.
Could watch the video yourself and parse out the information.
That's a lot of extra work, but if they provide useful information, it could be helpful to transcribe it into text form.
It's a difficult time.
The distractions nowadays are endless.
It's incredibly easy to just go, oh well, you know, the kid's being troublesome.
I've got stuff to do.
Put him in front of the TV and he can sit there for hours at a time.
You know, hey, whatever this kid's program is, is fine.
And studies have shown, even if they're not just pure propaganda for the new world order, transgender, LGBT, critical race theory nonsense, most of today's kid shows are actively harmful to their development.
They've gone in and they've studied the response of the brain, and they've engineered these kid shows to be as stimulating as possible so that they're doing cuts and having activity at a continual pace that's designed to make sure they don't get distracted, making sure that they are just hyper-focused, and it leads to all kinds of behavioral problems.
I forget, I believe it was this one called Coco Melon.
I don't know anything about it other than they did studies and found that it was horrendously detrimental for children who watch it.
And just the...
For one, he's too young, but for two, they're all awful.
So I don't know any of these kids' programs.
But I've seen stories about them over the years.
And just the characters in them seem to be nothing but selfish, annoying, undisciplined brats.
And kids learn through osmosis.
They tend to emulate what they see.
So if the character in the show spends most of it being an obnoxious, self-serving brat, it doesn't matter if in the last 30 seconds to a minute they get a small lecture about, well, that wasn't good.
Most of what the kid internalizes is, ooh, look, this is how a child behaves.
So there's all kinds of distractions.
There's all kinds of different ways that they're attacking children.
But they are the future and they're worth investing in.
Well, that's my time for today, folks.
I'm going to go spend time with my son.
God bless you all.
Have a wonderful rest of your day.
And there will be more content from David Knight coming soon.
I'll be back tomorrow.
See you then.
See you then.
The common man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidnightshow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Export Selection