Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 21, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:02:42

The David Knight Show - 5/21/2025

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	As the clock strikes 13, it is Wednesday, the 21st of May, and today we are going to look at Trump's ego and how some members of the MAGA movement might be having a bit of buyer's remorse, thanks to Bongino selling them out on Epstein.
	And Kristi Noem utterly fails to answer the question, what is habeas corpus?
	All this and more.
	Stay with us.
	Well, good morning, good morning, folks.
	It is the middle of the week.
	It is a pleasure to have you here with us.
	And as I said, today we're going to look at Trump's ego, and that's where we're going to start.
	This is an article on Zero Hedge, Trump Demands Probe into Kamala Harris' Illegal Celebrity Endorsements.
	President Trump has called for an investigation of what he describes as an illegal scheme by Kamala Harris' presidential campaign to pay left-wing celebrities for endorsements and deceptively frame them as entertainment services.
	And while I do agree this is some form of money laundering to some extent, this is not being done because he cares about the integrity of our political system.
	This is being done because it was used against him.
	We can see it in the way he acts, the way he behaves, and the way he speaks.
	This is about the fact that they dared to oppose him.
	And while the people that he's going after are In a true social post,
	Trump slammed Harris and took potshots at her celebrity supporters, charging that her campaign illegally channeled large payments to celebrities such as Beyonce, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, and Oprah Winfrey in exchange for endorsements poorly disguised as performances.
	Trump wrote, How much did Kamala Harris pay Bruce Springsteen for his poor performance during our campaign for president?
	Why did he accept that money if he's such a fan of hers?
	Isn't that a major and illegal campaign contribution?
	Very illegal.
	Very, very illegal.
	He continued, What about Beyonce?
	And how much went to Oprah and Bono?
	Well, I mean, at this point, you can't imagine Bono's making as much as the rest of them.
	I mean, his star has somewhat fallen since the days of U2.
	Trump further urged, I'm going to call for a major investigation into this matter.
	candidates aren't allowed to pay for endorsements, which is what Kamala did under the guise of paying for entertainment.
	In addition, this was a very expensive and desperate effort to artificially build up her sparse crowds.
	Trump further declared asserting it's not legal.
	For these unpatriotic entertainers, this was just a corrupt and unlawful way to capitalize on a broken system.
	Thank you for your attention to this matter.
	Well, Again, this is about their wounding of his ego.
	This is not about the rule of law or if they did violate campaign law at all.
	It is simply that they dared to oppose him, that they dared to challenge him.
	We...
	It is truly amazing, just the things that he has tweeted over the...
	Over the last week or two about Bruce Springsteen.
	Just very, very petty things.
	I'm not sure I've ever actually heard a Bruce Springsteen song, so I can't comment on his music, but he is just attacking the man personally.
	And of course, the tweet about Taylor Swift, how he said, Has anyone noticed that Taylor Swift's not hot anymore, since I said I don't like her?
	Words to that effect.
	This is...
	I mean, it's entertaining, but it's less entertaining since he is the President of the United States and he is supposed to be our highest...
	He's holding the highest office in the land and he is acting like a petulant child.
	This is on Mediaite.
	I'll shove it up their rear end, let's say.
	Trump rails against political opponents at posh dinner.
	President Donald Trump recalled the moment he decided to shove it up their rear end on Monday during a dinner speech railing against his political opponents.
	During a board dinner at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., Trump boasted about securing both the Olympics and the FIFA World Cup in the United States for 2028 and 2026, respectively.
	We got the Olympics, and we got through Gianni.
	He's the boss.
	He's a friend of mine.
	We got the World Cup.
	He said, I got both of them.
	And I said, man, I won't be president.
	I got the Olympics and the World Cup and I won't be president and they're going to forget that I got them.
	Nobody's going to mention it.
	Who cares?
	Literally, who cares where the Olympics or the World Cup are held?
	Does this matter to anyone?
	I mean, I'm sure it does, but no one that matters in the grand scheme of things.
	No one with an opinion you should care about.
	Trump continued and then they rigged the election.
	Then I said, you know what?
	I'll do it.
	I'll run again.
	And I'll shove it up their rear end.
	He did not say the word rear end.
	The words rear end.
	It was a singular word.
	As the board members laughed and applauded trumpet on.
	And that's what I did.
	And all of a sudden, and then I realized, I said, you know what?
	I got the Olympics.
	I got the World Cup.
	So if they would have left us alone...
	I wouldn't have cheated on the election.
	I'm not going to do the Trump impersonation the entire time.
	I feel that would become grating.
	I wouldn't have rigged it.
	I would have been retired right now, he concluded.
	I would have been happily doing something else, and instead they had me for four more years.
	Can you believe that?
	That's right.
	He is here simply out of spite, it seems.
	He even implies it himself, that it was simply because they took something from him that he's back.
	He is only here to satisfy his ego and to punish people he doesn't like.
	But look at that.
	I secured the best bread and circuses.
	I have the best bread and the best circuses.
	Everyone's always telling me that.
	They say, Trump, Mr. Trump, your circuses are the best.
	I love the gold tent.
	It's so golden.
	Trump nukes House Republican worried his big, beautiful bill adds too much debt.
	He should be voted out of.
	This is about Thomas Massey.
	Thomas Massey has been very, very critical of Donald Trump, especially when it comes to the budget over the years, and Trump hates him for it because Thomas Massey is standing on principle, and this exposes the hypocritical and unprincipled nature of Donald Trump.
	However you feel about Thomas Massey, whether you think he has compromised in other ways, you have to admit he has maintained his stance on the budget.
	He has not caved on that.
	President Donald Trump pulled no punches on Tuesday when asked about Rep.
	Thomas Massey, Republican Kentucky, Massey's opposition to his sweeping tax and spending bill known as the Big Beautiful Bill.
	Trump was on Capitol Hill.
	That's where bills go, you know.
	We go to Capitol Hill.
	Trump was on Capitol Hill meeting with Republican leadership when he stopped to take some questions from reporters alongside Speaker Mike Johnson.
	What do you say to the fiscal hawks who want to delay this?
	They say it doesn't cut enough spending, asked a reporter as Trump cut in.
	I'm a fiscal hawk.
	I'm a bigger fiscal hawk.
	There's nobody like me as a fiscal hawk.
	The way he speaks, it's truly one of a kind.
	Thomas Massey says it adds more deficit than Biden did, and this bill kind of, another reporter said as Trump interjected, because we had to fix the country.
	Do you think that Thomas Massey is correct in saying that, added the reporter as Trump replied.
	No, I don't think Thomas Massey understands government.
	I think he's a grandstander.
	The irony.
	You would think this amount of irony would kill a man.
	They wouldn't be able to say this.
	It would just...
	They would choke on their words as they try to.
	Donald Trump calling someone else a grandstander.
	And this is, you know, after he says that we're having to increase spending in order to fix the country.
	Like, maybe a different strategy.
	We can spend our way out of this debt hole we're in, folks.
	That's how it works.
	We'll just come out the other side.
	I think he's a grandstander, frankly.
	He'll probably vote.
	We don't even talk to him much.
	I think you should be voted out of office.
	And I just don't.
	He understands government.
	If you ask him a couple of questions, he never gives you an answer.
	He just says, I'm a no.
	He thinks he's going to get publicity, and you have that.
	You have that.
	They've got some too.
	Well, that's a very Trump sentence right there.
	Massey, who has long been known for voting against most legislation, Made his opposition to Trump's bill clear on X. The Big Beautiful Bill will add $20 trillion of federal debt over 10 years.
	And that's according to the authors of it.
	But there's another huge problem.
	It will increase the price of the $36 trillion of debt we already have as bond buyers realize we aren't fiscally responsible.
	Massey wrote while sharing a news report about Moody's cutting the country's credit rating.
	That's right.
	We have an article about that.
	We'll talk about that in a bit.
	Massey later added, Monday on news of the BBB Big Beautiful Bill, 30-year U.S. Treasuries rose to 5% and 10-year U.S. Treasuries rose to 4.52%.
	That's the price we pay to finance national debt when old notes mature.
	We're approaching $1.5 trillion of annual interest payments over $4,000 per U.S. citizen per year.
	Well, I, for one, am so excited.
	To pay my fair share.
	To satisfy Donald Trump's ego.
	There is nothing I wouldn't pay to help Donald Trump shove it up their rear end, right?
	Because that's what we're here for.
	We're here to be good little slaves and let those in power play out their petty vendettas.
	Well, before we move on...
	I just wanted to say again, thank you for all the prayers you have been sending up for our dad.
	Of course, he is still here and he's still recovering.
	He is doing better.
	We just ask that you continue to pray for him.
	I know I say this every day, but I do want to continually remind people because I know that you all have a lot going on.
	So please continue to pray for him, pray for healing, pray for a speedy recovery.
	We know that it's all in God's hands.
	I also am going to take this moment to plug and say if you'd like to support the show, You can do so on subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight Show.
	You can sign up and they will charge your card monthly.
	There's many different tiers of support from $5 all the way up to, I don't remember the top tier off the top of my head, but it goes up quite a ways.
	So you can do that.
	You can go to the website and get the PO Box if you'd like to send a check directly.
	You can go to davidknight.gold, which Tony Arterburn has set up, and if you'd like to get outside the fiat system, that's a great way to do it.
	You can sign up for Wolfpack through davidknight.gold, and he will ship you gold or silver monthly on a subscription service, which is pretty cool.
	There's also the Trends Journal.
	If you go to trendsjournal.com, sign up and use promo code KNIGHT, you get 10% off, and we also get a small percentage of that.
	Which is a great help.
	It is very kind of Tony and Gerald to set those things up for us.
	You can also leave a tip on Kik if you want to.
	You can also leave a comment with that and that will make sure that we see it.
	We try to read as many comments as we can but the chat moves pretty fast and that is a way to ensure that we see it.
	You can also subscribe on Kik.
	So, those are the ways to support us.
	I won't belabor the point.
	I thank you for all the support that has been sent.
	It has been truly amazing to see.
	And if you have questions or comments, just direct them at the account.
	I love hearing from you guys in the chat.
	I'm trying to be more engaged with you all, so please send your questions and comments in.
	I want to hear them.
	And in fact, we have one from Knights of the Storm, Jason Barker.
	How can Trump complain about campaign contributions when he received hundreds of millions from Elon through a private single-member super PAC?
	That's right.
	Elon is his sugar daddy.
	Another follow-up from Jason in Knights of the Storm.
	Elon circumvented the law in open sight.
	That's right.
	The law is only there.
	It is really only there for show.
	They will circumvent it however they want.
	It will be applied to whoever they want, whenever they want, however they want.
	It is simply there in case they feel like applying it.
	This whole thing of Trump coming after the people that were endorsing Kamala Harris smussed him going after his political opponents.
	Sure, there is often lots of corruption in the political system, but it's on both sides.
	He's just going after his opponents.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Guilty of much the same things himself.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Very much reminiscent of Nixon's enemies list.
	I am not a crook.
	Well, when the president does it, it's not illegal.
	And this is on Defense News.
	It's by Courtney Alban and Jen Judson.
	Trump estimates Golden Dome will cost $175 billion over three years.
	This is part of Trump's plan to modernize the U.S.'s defense system against missiles and other such threats of that nature.
	And of course, there is nothing but an expansion of the military-industrial complex and the Pentagon's war state.
	In an Oval Office reveal Tuesday, flanked by U.S. military generals and Republican senators, President Donald Trump offered new details about his ambitious Golden Dome missile shield project, which he expects to have a price tag of around $175 billion and be completed before the end of his term.
	I'm pleased to announce that we have officially selected an architecture for the state-of-the-art system that will deploy next-generation technologies across the land, sea, and space, including space-based sensors and interceptors, Trump said.
	Once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles, even if they are launched from the other side of the world, even if they're launched from space, and we will have the best system ever built.
	It is...
	It's very corny to me that he just looked at Israel and went, oh, they've got the Iron Dome?
	Well...
	We're going to have a golden dome.
	It's going to be made of gold, folks, because my dome is better.
	It's bigger and better and shinier and fancier than any dome ever built.
	It's the best dome.
	Everyone says, I've got the best dome on the planet.
	Trump also announced he has appointed General Michael Guttlein the Space Force's second-in-command to oversee the effort, which has become one of the president's signature defense projects just months into his second term.
	Gutlein, currently Vice Chief of Space Operations, previously led the Space Force's primary acquisition organizations, Space Systems Command.
	There he oversaw major development efforts and helped streamline the space enterprise's notoriously fragmented acquisition system.
	Earlier in his career, he served as Deputy Commander of the National Reconnaissance Office and Program Executive Officer for Programs and Integration at the Missile Defense Agency, two of them organizations that will play a significant role in building out the Golden Dome architecture.
	Well, hopefully they do something in Art Deco, because I'm tired of the modern architecture we see around us.
	I greatly appreciate your trust in me and your trust in the team to deliver this, Gutlein told Trump.
	It's a great day for America.
	That's right.
	Any day you get to expand the military-industrial complex and grow the defense budget is a great day for America.
	So, we can all look forward to that.
	We can look forward to the Golden Dome encapsulating us all.
	And the military-industrial complex getting more money and more power.
	I'm sure that they will not use this for nefarious purposes.
	We have a comment from Zen Women.
	He hasn't even finished the border wall.
	That's right.
	The border is still wide open, folks.
	So...
	That's why he's got to build the dome.
	He's got to encapsulate us.
	He's got to put a dome over the United States.
	And, of course, I don't really believe he's going to put an actual dome.
	That is simply the terminology that they use.
	Francine, improvised army got through the Iron Dome.
	So, yeah, the Iron Dome has a...
	It might be more like a sieve, you know?
	There's some holes in it you can get through.
	Got in with paragliders.
	Yeah, that was a...
	That was truly something.
	Those videos were something else to see.
	And, of course, we don't want to make too light of that, because many people did die, and there were many tragedies that happened that day.
	The Israel-Gaza conflict is a horror on both sides.
	There are no good people, well, very few good people in that conflict, and there are a lot of innocent people caught in the middle.
	It is a tragedy.
	It is important to remember that.
	And this article is actually on Time.
	Not on Time, but on Time.com.
	Trump pushes divided Republicans to get behind his big, beautiful bill.
	That's right.
	Trump likes to bully people into doing what he wants.
	He doesn't like to lay out the logical reasons why it's a good idea.
	He doesn't want to sit there and rationally articulate to the other Republicans in government why they should follow him.
	He simply likes to say you better get in line What is he going to say to them to get them to support this huge spending bill that adds $20 trillion to the deficit?
	I mean, considering how government operates, he could probably just say that and they'd be like, oh great, yeah, no, hold on.
	Yeah, I'm all for that.
	But, of course, he has not made many friends in office.
	They do not like him, but that's not because he's our friend.
	It's simply because he is mean to them.
	President Donald Trump arrived on Capitol Hill on Tuesday with a warning to House Republicans.
	Vote against his massive tax and spending bill and you might get primary.
	That's right.
	That's his continual threat.
	I'll campaign against you and get you voted out.
	But we've seen time and time again that that doesn't always happen.
	He likes to think he has the power to get anyone out of office whenever he wants, but...
	Quite a few times he has campaigned against people, and they've won anyway, simply because the people in their state support them.
	It was a characteristic bit of strong arming from Trump as negotiations over his sprawling legislative package or on thin ice, the legislation which Trump dubbed A big, beautiful bill seeks to extend its 2017 tax cuts and reshape federal spending priorities.
	Critics say it would deepen the deficit and tear holes in the safety net, though the White House insists it would save the government $1.6 trillion.
	Possibly, Trump said when asked if lawmakers who oppose the bill should face primary challengers, they wouldn't be a Republican much longer.
	They'd be knocked out so fast.
	Trump spoke with House Republicans for more than an hour in what appeared to be part pep rally, part pressure campaign.
	He cheered on House Speaker Mike Johnson and declared the Republican Party tremendously unified.
	But he also showed little tolerance for intra-party resistance.
	Among those in his crosshairs was, again, Rep.
	Thomas Massey of Kentucky, a libertarian-leaning Republican.
	And between the two of them, if one of them is going to understand what the bill is going to do...
	To the economy, Thomas Massey is definitely who I would trust in that instance.
	Donald Trump does not think these things through, or if he does, he does not actually care.
	We've seen time and time again, he is simply out for himself or the people of his ilk.
	Now, the comment from Knights of the Storm, Jason Barker.
	And again, good to see you, Jason.
	Glad you're here.
	DC already has a hybrid system based off the Iron Dome but modified with our tech.
	I was supposed to go train on it when I was in but lost the opportunity because I was unjabbed and not allowed to travel.
	I think this is another money pit to create something we already have.
	Well, even better, folks.
	We've already got it and they're just going to spend more.
	Gotta love it.
	Though, to be fair, actually, maybe...
	I would actually probably support more of that thing.
	If instead of adding new technological horrors to what we already have, they just spend money on what's already there.
	Maybe that's a better use of our time.
	Wally Walrus, Thomas Massey won't get beaten up.
	They realize that Thomas Massey supports them more than Donald Trump does.
	More closely reflects their values than Donald Trump does.
	and Trump is a fool to think that he can just say these things and make them so.
	And he may not actually believe it.
	It may just be bravado and braggadocio.
	Attention comes as Republican leaders race to build consensus around the legislation ahead of a planned floor vote as early as Wednesday.
	And again, A lot of those are good things.
	The no tax on tips, the Medicaid benefits revocation for undocumented immigrants, all for that.
	But you can only imagine what's in 1,116 pages.
	It is filled with other garbage.
	That's what they always do.
	They put some things that you're going to like and make you out to be the enemy because you're voting against this.
	This is what the people wanted.
	And never talk about the other probably 900 and...
	90 pages.
	And remember when the Trump fanatics were all assuming that he was going to end internal taxation because he's adding all of these tariffs?
	Well, so much for that.
	Yeah.
	I don't know how they managed to convince themselves of that.
	Bit foolhardy.
	Bit foolhardy.
	But that's the MAGA base.
	Vaccine impact.
	Trump continues to attack U.S. businesses like Walmart for being honest about his tariffs, forcing price increases.
	Meanwhile, children are massacred in Gaza genocide.
	This is by Brian Chilhavi.
	Of course, he is the editor of Health Impact News.
	As I predicted, President Trump attacks Walmart today for telling the truth that they are going to be forced to raise their prices because of Trump's tariffs.
	Of course, they're going to raise their prices.
	This is something that is obvious on the face of it.
	A company is not just going to eat the cost.
	They are going to pass it along to the consumer.
	This has always been the case.
	It will always be the case.
	The company wants to maximize profits, and the best way they can do that is to pass this along.
	To think otherwise is to be an utter fool.
	Walmart should stop trying to blame.
	Tariffs is the reason for raising prices throughout the chain, Trump wrote on True Social.
	Between Walmart and China, they should, as is said, Eat the tariffs and not charge valued customers anything.
	I'll be watching and so will your customers.
	As I have reported many times, China does not pay the tariffs.
	That's right, folks.
	He goes on to outline that again.
	The tariffs are paid by the company.
	They are being charged.
	The tariffs.
	They say they put tariffs on China, but it is on American companies who do business with these places.
	China is not losing money.
	If they are buying these things from China, chances are they have to continue buying them from China.
	We don't really have the manufacturing base here in the United States.
	China, nor any other countries, products sold in the U.S. pay these tariffs.
	The U.S. business always pays them.
	And while China tariffs stood at 145% for over a month, nobody was importing anything from China, and the effects of that are now being seen at the ports and throughout the U.S. logistics system as tens of thousands of people are being laid off now.
	That's right.
	This is hammering the U.S. economy.
	It is crushing jobs, and not just crushing jobs and getting them removed, but people are unable to hire at the moment because the economy is so uncertain.
	They can't tell what's going to happen day to day, what their costs are going to look like, and what their profits are going to look like.
	It's impossible to make an intelligent and well-reasoned judgment when you're dealing with a madman.
	For those like Walmart that are now resuming shipments with the current 30% tariff in place, for the next couple of months they will have no choice but to raise prices to offset at least some of that 30% increase in their prices.
	And at least in MAGA land, people continue to believe Trump instead, as some conservatives are now calling for boycotts on Walmart.
	And again, we are not fans of China here.
	We are not just trying to maintain our importation of random junk from China.
	It is simply the fact that we do not have the manufacturing base here.
	And to pretend otherwise is foolish.
	There are certain things that we are dependent on other countries for at this time.
	And until we are able to ramp up production here, it is foolish to cut it off.
	And ramping up production is not something you can do overnight.
	We don't have the factories built.
	We either have to build them completely fresh or potentially refit and refurbish old factories that have fallen into disrepair.
	SoloCat, 1980.
	Each company should itemize the tariffs on their products so the customers can see it.
	Yes, they should, but we've seen how Trump reacted when, well, was it Amazon threatened to do that, I believe.
	And he threw a fit.
	He was fit to be tied.
	He was not happy with them.
	The kind of cost increase that it is going to cause them.
	And if memory serves, it wasn't even Amazon.
	It was a subsidiary of them or something along those lines.
	And yet, at least in Magellan, people continue to believe Trump instead of, as some conservatives are now calling for, boycotts on Walmart.
	In my 25 years of experience as a business owner importing goods in the U.S., I have never seen anything like this, where an American president is demonizing American businesses for his own economic policies and lying to do so.
	That's right.
	If you have to raise your prices to remain in business because Trump has charged you a tariff for purchasing something out of country that we don't make in-country, well then, you're evil, and he is going to excoriate you.
	He will make sure that the American people know you're a bad, bad boy.
	And at least so far, there is this huge subset of the country who are choosing to believe the lies out of Trump's mouth instead of the truth.
	And like I mentioned before,
	when we talked about this last time, There are so many regulations strangling these manufacturing here in America that reopening these factories or creating new ones just isn't practical in many cases.
	It's cheaper for them to just eat the tariffs and continue manufacturing it in China where they have cheaper energy and, you know, cheaper whatever.
	Yeah, slave labor is an intrinsic part of the China price.
	That's how they are able to manufacture things so cheaply.
	We will really never be able to compete with them on price.
	We could compete with them on quality, because that's what we used to do.
	And that would be a trade-off that the American purchaser could decide on.
	Do we want a cheaper, mass-produced product, or do we want a more high-quality, more boutique product, let's say?
	But this is a very good article.
	It outlines the tariff problems that we are having.
	Again, it is on Vaccine Impact.
	It is by Brian Chalhave.
	Trump continues, and this is the headline again in case you want to find it, Trump continues to attack U.S. businesses like Walmart for being honest about his tariffs, forcing price increases.
	Meanwhile, children are massacred in Gaza genocide.
	Well, I think that's enough today about Trump.
	I, for one, don't like talking about him.
	There's never any good news.
	It is always simply him blustering and bluffing his way through things.
	So I think we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, maybe we'll have a little bit of a fun segment.
	What do you guys say?
	MUSIC PLAYS
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show
	I just need to remind y 'all again, everyone who is ginger, who has red hair, those are black people.
	All gingers are black people.
	If they have red hair, they are black.
	You see a white man with red hair, that's a black man.
	You see a white woman with red hair, that's a black woman.
	Gingers are black.
	That's right.
	You heard it here, folks.
	I am a strong, proud black man, and to deny it is to deny reality.
	And I would just like to be the first to say that I will accept my reparations graciously.
	So please direct them at me however you see fit.
	I demand my 30 acres and a mule.
	So, this was a sad but somewhat entertaining article on Zero Hedge.
	British school kids are being taught black people built Stonehenge.
	Well, it is nice to know that my people built Stonehenge.
	We truly are an industrious race.
	We get up to so many creative endeavors.
	British school children are being taught that Stonehenge was built by black people.
	My people.
	That's right.
	That is right.
	Yes, really.
	Research by the Think Tank Policy Exchange uncovered one book that makes this claim.
	Brilliant black British history is being used widely in schools.
	This is another one of those things where, because there was potentially a small minority, a minuscule minority of black people that may have existed at one point or been to another continent at some point, they continually like to point out, like, well, we found a skeleton that may have been from Africa or was from Africa, and as such, we think that the original residents of this land were black.
	And it's like, well, have you found any others?
	Well, we found one, so that implies that there could be more.
	It's like, oh good, of course, yes, that tracks.
	And Madeline Emerald on Twitter, they've got the tweet here, and you can find her at Emerald Thiele.
	The drive to decolonize history curriculums has gone too far, warns report.
	Well, yes.
	And as at Tony Dowson rightly points out, the report shows that the Stone Edge Point is still being taught.
	This insanity just keeps spiraling.
	The book written by Nigerian-born author Atenuke.
	Atenuke?
	Has sparked outrage among historians, parents, and anyone with a passing interest, and you know, facts.
	That's right, but I mean, facts are such pesky things.
	Why would you want to care about facts when you can just make things up and have so much fun along the way?
	New Children's Book claims Stone Age British people were black and pagan monument Stonehenge was built by black people.
	And again, those are my people, and I am horrified that you would try to steal our history from us.
	What kind of person steals another's history?
	Shameful.
	The new book titled Brilliant Black History claims Britain was a black country 7,000 years before white people settled in Britain.
	And you can see in this tweet the type of book we're dealing with.
	The art on the cover is high quality.
	Truly amazing to look at and see.
	And then...
	From Ancient Europeans at Ancient Europa One, if you thought Horrible Histories was amplifying the propaganda, well, here's a new book aimed at children that also inserts Sub-Saharan Africans into British history.
	Brilliant black history.
	Things that never happened.
	Again, I just found this moderately entertaining, especially considering the fact we've all discovered today that gingers are black.
	It is nice to see that my people are being recognized for their achievements.
	I'd also like to point out that they show the Roman soldier as being black in the photo here as well.
	That's right.
	We have been all over the place.
	The most humorous thing to me is if those black Hebrew Israelites in Memphis that called me a white devil had only known the truth, they would have embraced me as one of their brothers.
	They would have given me one of their outfits and realized that I am not the enemy.
	I am one of them.
	Truly.
	We are in this fight together, me and the black Hebrew Israelites.
	We are in it together, and we are going to win it together.
	You know, just a little bit of lighthearted fun here.
	And we've got a comment from TheRealOctoSpook.
	Uh, you don't think those tariffs taxes are paying for the Golden Dome and government waste and corruption, do you?
	No, that is...
	It's going to go to who knows what.
	It is not funding anything of substance.
	They never are.
	It all ends up in the pockets of those in power.
	And the debt continues to increase year over year.
	And it has accelerated so much under Trump and Biden.
	Trump really kicked it into high gear.
	And now I want to look at some COVID and COVID vaccine and just vaccine-related news.
	There's never really any happy news stories when you talk about vaccines, but this one is particularly sad.
	It's very close to home for me now, after we had our son.
	The Defender.
	This is by Suzanne Burdick, PhD.
	Six-month-old dies after receiving six routine vaccines at a wellness visit.
	You can see the picture of this six-month-old here.
	Blessings Miracle, Jean Simmons received six vaccines at roughly 3 p.m. on January 13th at a six-month wellness visit.
	The next morning, her parents found the baby dead in her bassinet.
	The autopsy listed sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, as the infant's cause of death.
	And we see this very frequently, where the child goes in and gets their vaccinations, especially when they get multiple at a time, and that has become the norm.
	We see that they will very frequently afterwards be found, and it will be listed as a SIDS casualty.
	They'll pretend they know nothing about what causes it.
	But you can see the baby there.
	She was a very cute, very sweet baby.
	Less than 14 hours after six-month-old Blessings Miracle Jean Simmons was given six vaccines during a six-month wellness visit, she died.
	The baby received the vaccines at roughly 3 p.m. on January 13th at a clinic in Louisiana, according to the baby's mother, Brishay McKinley.
	At roughly 8.30 a.m. the next morning, the parents found Blessing's dead in her bassinet.
	We miss her so much, McKinley told the defender.
	Our son just turned six months at the beginning of this month, and I can't even imagine the level of pain and anguish they are going through.
	So, keep this family in your prayers.
	They are going through probably one of the worst things a family could ever experience.
	When asked what she most wanted to tell the public, McKinley said, Don't let you, your loved ones, or your children become a statistic of pharma.
	McKinley and her partner, Elijah Simmons, shared the story of their daughter, Blessings, death, in an interview with chd.tv program director, Polly Tommy.
	McKinley told Tommy, we just want justice for her, and we want to bring awareness.
	Blessings was in perfect health when she went in for a routine visit.
	The day Blessings went to the pediatrician's office for her six-month visit, she was in perfect health.
	It was five days before she turned six months old.
	She was cooing, babbling.
	She was her normal self, McKinley said.
	According to Blessing's vaccination record shared with CHD.tv, she was given six vaccines recommended for six-month-olds on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's immunization schedule.
	They included a second dose of DTaP and Hib, H-I-B, hemophilus, influenza type B, rotavirus, Pneumococcal and a third dose of hepatitis B vaccine.
	She received two shots in each leg.
	The other two vaccines were given orally.
	So two in each leg, two orally.
	I thought they were doing what was needed to do to keep her healthy and safe.
	That's how they get you.
	They prey on your fear.
	They tell you there are so many diseases out there that are going to kill your baby.
	And so you need to get these vaccines.
	If you don't, you are leaving them unprotected and you are a bad parent.
	What they do.
	They sit there and they hammer home this idea that your child is completely and utterly unprotected from these things.
	That there is no hope if you don't get the vaccine.
	Whereas we've seen that your immune system does a pretty good job of fighting off most of these things.
	And the other way you can prevent them getting sick is just mitigating exposure.
	It is not like you can't control the environment.
	It is a lot harder when you send your kids to public school.
	Especially when we've seen over and over again that these vaccines shed.
	We continually trace back measles outbreaks to people that got vaccinated and then spread it around in their community.
	Her parents gave her Tylenol.
	As the pediatrician had recommended, we just tried to soothe her, McKinley said.
	It was because she was cranky after the injections.
	She did not feel well.
	They assumed it was just pain from the injection sites.
	Her dad rocked her to sleep.
	Roughly an hour later, the parents went to bed.
	When we woke up that next morning, that's when we found her, lifeless.
	When we touched her body, it was cold.
	Words can't even describe the grief.
	Blessings was born roughly five weeks early, on July 8th, 2024, but was a generally healthy baby, McKinley said.
	She was thriving.
	She was healthy.
	She was given a dose of the Hep B vaccine at birth due to being born prematurely.
	She stayed briefly in the neonatal intensive care unit, but was soon released.
	In September 2024, she received a second dose of Hep B and her first dose of the DTaP, polio, HIV, rotavirus, pneumococcal, and RSV vaccines.
	McKinley told the defender they named her blessings because she was going to be a divine gift.
	And the light we needed after going through recent trials and tribulations.
	Again, pray for this family.
	They are experiencing such a horrific tragedy.
	Make sure that you pray that they are given peace and comfort during this.
	Simmons told Tommy that losing blessings has been very hard.
	Shocking, he paused.
	It's...
	His voice trailed off.
	Words can't even describe, McKinley said.
	Simmons and McKinley have a four-year-old son who now misses his baby sister.
	The boy was diagnosed with autism at age two.
	McKinley told Tommy she's unsure what caused his autism but suspects the vaccines he received may have played a role.
	I'm about 90% sure that was the case.
	It seems...
	We see this over and over again.
	Whether it's SIDS or autism, the vaccines are hurting people.
	Or the sudden uptake in SADS, sudden adult death syndrome.
	Yes, it is not just children now.
	It is everyone that is being affected by these poisons.
	Audi MMR.
	Come on, folks.
	That baby's death is rare.
	Take the vax.
	That's right.
	It is simply a rare thing that happens, and you should risk your child's life and health just because pharma needs a few more billion dollars.
	You don't want pharma to go broke, do you?
	Wally Walrus, my daughter, had an adverse reaction to one of the early shots.
	My ex went and listened to my rhetoric about vaccines being harmful.
	My daughter went and listened to my rhetoric about vaccines being harmful.
	I can't even imagine how terrifying and enraging that must have been for you.
	That must have been just a nightmare.
	And I'm glad to hear that it was only a temporary adverse reaction.
	I'm very thankful that that was the case, Wally.
	And I hope your daughter is doing well to this day.
	It's really amazing how propagandized people are by Big Pharma with the constant pushing.
	If they watch any kind of mainstream TV, it's just one ad after another.
	And of course, that's going to affect the media that is sponsored by them.
	They aren't going to talk bad about the people that are their main source of income.
	Yes.
	Even when you have a child go limp for a day, Yeah, that's right.
	They'll consider that roll of the dice worth it because they have been told things like measles are...
	Very, very deadly.
	Whereas, again, my dad has talked about it again.
	They had measles parties when they were kids.
	Oh, the neighbors got measles?
	Well, you're going to go get it so we can get this out of the way.
	It wasn't seen as this nightmare scenario.
	It was just a fact of life.
	It was something, it was a childhood disease.
	You would get and get over it.
	But they have propagandized everyone into this continual fear state where, oh, it's highly contagious.
	Yeah, but is it dangerous?
	It doesn't matter how contagious something is if it's not going to do anything to you.
	You might be itchy for a bit, but you'll most likely get over it.
	It was not a big deal back in the 60s when my parents were kids.
	It shouldn't be a big deal now.
	This is another article.
	This is on The Daily Skeptic.
	It's by Rebecca Barnett.
	35 people died the same day as their COVID shot, but authorities did not investigate.
	That's right.
	They never investigate this stuff.
	They simply write it off.
	This investigation was first published on dystopian down under Rebecca Barnett's sub stack newsletter, sub stack newsletter in partnership with Canberra, Yeah, the rest of them are all just sad.
	It's just sudden and spontaneous.
	Yeah.
	They will do anything they can to obfuscate the real cause of deaths in these scenarios.
	They will make sure that it is incredibly hard to report deaths and then they will do everything they can to remove culpability even though they aren't on the hook for it anyway.
	They just want to make sure that they continue to rope more people into their pharma game and get to poison more people.
	Travis, may I ask how you and your wife are navigating the whole healthcare system to protect your son?
	Well, we thankfully have a very good doctor down in Texas.
	We talked to some friends who have kids down there, and they recommended her.
	They, of course, ask if you would like to vaccinate, but we've said no.
	We've said no and they've never asked again.
	They have been very, very respectful of our wishes and, of course, we never leave the room just in case.
	We are always there with him.
	We just...
	You've got to be extremely careful.
	You've got to find a doctor that you can trust as much as you can and then also stay with them.
	If you leave the room, there is no telling.
	What some of these nurses may do.
	Some of them feel they have the right to do whatever they want because they know better.
	So just find the best doctor you can.
	Find someone that isn't going to push them on you or call CPS on you if you refuse to vaccinate.
	And still don't wholly trust, but maintain line of sight on the kid at all times.
	Nights of the storm, oral vaccines are an important topic.
	Why do you think the lab-grown meat and vaccinated natural meat can get you through your food?
	I don't think they are quite there yet with vaccinating you through your food, but they are sure trying.
	There are tons of articles and peer-reviewed studies on it.
	That's right, they are injecting mRNA into our food supply.
	They are doing all kinds of weird experiments with the food chain.
	They want to make sure that no matter how you try to opt out, they have ways of getting you anyway.
	You say yes to the jab or not, they want to make sure that they can get you.
	Australians are routinely assured deaths arising from COVID vaccinations are vanishingly rare, based on the drug safety regulator's claim that it has identified only 14 deaths linked to vaccinations out of more than 70 million doses given.
	The other 1,000-plus deaths reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration's, TGA Safety Surveillance Database, the DAEN, are widely assumed to be merely coincidental, and the TGA has encouraged this perception, frequently asserting that most deaths that occur after vaccination are not caused by the vaccine.
	People continually repeat the phrase, correlation does not equal causation, but they do so as a way of thought termination.
	They use it as a way to shut down arguments that they do not like.
	Correlation does not equal argumentation is not supposed to work that way.
	It is meant as an exhortation to verify what you see.
	Not to just blindly trust, but to look at the data and see if there is a correlation.
	But the people who say it have all but given up on actually doing any of their own research.
	They sit there and they use it as a way to shut you down.
	As I said, it is a thought-terminating cliché.
	It has no real meaning.
	People who say it are some of the least thoughtful, least intelligent, least well-researched people on the planet.
	It's just a phrase that smart-sounding people say, or dumb people say to sound smart.
	Correlation doesn't equal causation, but it is a major indicator of it.
	And when you see a strong correlation, you should look into that to determine if there is another factor or if, as is most likely, it is actually a causation.
	Yes.
	It is very frequently.
	Very frequently means there is, in fact, a link.
	But people act as though you're an idiot for looking at something and going, well, this...
	Very obviously looks related.
	Correlation doesn't equal causation, my dear child.
	Oh, you simpleton, you fool.
	You see that 1 plus 1 equals 2 and think that 1 plus 3 must equal 4. You idiot.
	You buffoon.
	Moreover, the TGA gives the impression that all reported deaths are thoroughly investigated, stating that the TGA closed reviews all deaths reported in the days and weeks after the COVID-19 vaccination.
	A renewed document released under Freedom of Information FOI laws and obtained by Canberra daily suggests the public has been misled.
	The government lied?
	Oh, man.
	The government lies to people?
	When did this start happening?
	When did they start lying?
	I'm scared.
	I don't like this.
	The government lies.
	I thought they were trustworthy, guys.
	Gosh darn.
	Contrary to widespread belief, the documents show that the TGA does not thoroughly investigate every death reported to the DAEN.
	This is even the case where people died on the same day that they received their COVID shots.
	Again, I can't believe the government would lie to us.
	The Australian government lies.
	That's sad.
	Canberra Daily can reveal that out of 35 reports of Australians whose deaths occurred on the same day as their COVID vaccination, the TGA completed a causality assessment for only 24. The remaining 11 deaths had no causality assessment report available.
	Trump Burger.
	Every time you hear SIDS, it most likely means a vax or medical injury.
	SIDS is a catch-all term for what they can't or won't verify.
	That's right.
	It is simply, as you said, a catch-all term.
	Something they slap on as an explanation that explains nothing.
	It's just, oh.
	The child died suddenly.
	Well, why did the child die suddenly?
	We don't know.
	Could be anything.
	Could it be the poison that you pumped into them the day before or the week before that was still in their system?
	Oh, we don't know.
	Hard to say.
	Yona Annie Wode.
	Good to see you, Yona.
	Hope you're doing well.
	My son is autistic.
	Kia soda was normal until the measles mumps rubella injection.
	No children have been jabbed since.
	Well, I'm so sorry for what happened to your son.
	I know you...
	I know it must be a lot of work, but I'm sure he is still a wonderful, beautiful child.
	And he has a great family to surround himself and support him.
	So I'm sure that you are doing a wonderful job taking care of him, Yona.
	And it is good to see you.
	I hope you're doing well.
	Paleo Armory.
	My wife resisted the jabs, and the one time I didn't accompany her to the doctor, the pediatrician guilt tripped her into jabs.
	Same night.
	High fever.
	Then she was totally different.
	Barely toxic.
	I'm so sorry to hear that, Paleo.
	I'm very, very sorry to hear that.
	That is a story I have heard where the wife will be guilt-tripped into it and they will play on their fear.
	I imagine when you give birth to a child, you have a special connection.
	You are deeply Not that I don't want to protect our son, but my wife is obsessed with him.
	She loves him so deeply.
	She worries about all kinds of things simply because she wants to make sure that he isn't harmed in any way.
	So I can imagine that sitting there and hammering her on the fear would be more effective than it is on me.
	Audi MRR.
	The polio epidemic was deadly.
	Yes, we've talked about this before, but sanitation is the main reason why disease has gone away in the West.
	We have gotten much, much better about keeping ourselves clean and keeping our environment clean of things that would do us harm.
	We can see the correlation in when sanitation was on the rise, the disease was on the fall.
	Bill Barr, responding to Yona, Best friend died from two Modernas.
	His wife needed him to get them so they could travel.
	What a nightmare.
	We need vengeance.
	Well, whether there is justice in this life, there will be justice in the next.
	These people will eventually pay for their crimes.
	That is certain.
	It is only a matter of whether they will pay here on Earth as well.
	And again, we are not advocating violence here on the David Knight Show.
	We would like justice.
	We would like to see them.
	Brought up in court on charges and then let the people decide what to do with them.
	In correspondence with the TGA, Canberra Daily was additionally able to confirm that the Drug Safety Watchdog has never ruled out a causal link between the vast majority of deaths reported and COVID vaccination.
	In fact, all reported deaths are considered by the regulator to be possibly linked to vaccination, despite regular public statements implying the opposite.
	That's right.
	They will, to your face, say there's absolutely no correlation.
	We are sure of it.
	We are 100% sure, or at least imply, that they are.
	And behind the scenes, if you really press them, you can get them to admit, well, there might be.
	There might be, but you know, it's worth the risk because it was so deadly.
	It was so scary.
	We needed it.
	We needed to inject you with this experimental gene therapy that may kill you or do horrific things to you.
	And it's worth it.
	It's worth it because it enriches pharma even more.
	As well as the 35 deaths that occurred on the same day as COVID vaccination, Dr. Niblett found that for reports where time of death information was available, one in four occurred within three days of a COVID shot being administered.
	39% of deaths occurred within a week of vaccination and 86% within six weeks.
	This is what's known as a temporal relationship with Dr. Niblett, which Dr. Niblett stressed cannot be brushed aside.
	Temporality is an integral component of assessing whether a causal link exists between a medicine and an adverse event.
	You want to look at when they were vaccinated or when they took the medicine and see how long after they had an adverse reaction.
	Who's working to publish her findings producing collaboration with a working group of scientists and healthcare professionals affiliated with the Australian Medical Professional Society.
	The World Health Organization, WHO, stipulates in its guidelines that the temporal relationship between the AEFI and the administration of a drug is one of the criteria that should be considered by regulators when assessing causality.
	Well, we can see that Australia has been lying to its people and that they are covering up a massive number of deaths.
	They have been hiding it since COVID happened and they will continue to hide it.
	They never admit fault.
	They only ever double down.
	That's how they operate.
	And this is another story about the COVID vaccines.
	This is on Zero Hedge.
	It's authored by Zachary Stieber of the Epoch Times, for the Epoch Times.
	The top FDA official discloses she never received COVID-19 vaccine.
	That's right.
	They want rules for thee, but not for me.
	I'm not taking that.
	That's scary.
	I don't know what's in that.
	That's dangerous.
	A top Food and Drug Administration FDA official said on May 15 that she never took a COVID-19 vaccine due to concerns about biodistribution.
	Dr. Sarah Brenner, the FDA's principal deputy commissioner, said during an event in Washington that she did not receive any of the COVID-19 vaccines.
	What?
	You couldn't put that poison to me?
	That's for suckers.
	That's for the little people.
	That's for people like you and me.
	That's what they want.
	Brenner said that she was pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic.
	It was unknown at the time what the biodistribution patterns of those products were, and in my case, in particular, what the excretion would be in breast milk, Brenner said.
	That was my primary concern, and that exposure I was very concerned about.
	When asked whether the information that has emerged since then validates her choice, Brenner, who said she was not speaking on behalf of the FDA, said she thinks it does.
	Researchers reported in a 2022 paper that messenger ribonucleic acid, which is in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots, was detected in human breast milk.
	That's right, passing the shot right on to your baby, or at least parts of the shot.
	Another paper in 2023 detailed similar findings.
	Pfizer and Moderna did not return requests for comment.
	Why would they?
	Oh yeah, we're uh...
	It's going to alter your breast milk.
	It's going to alter your body.
	It is going to be passed directly onto your baby.
	You're never going to get these people to make a comment on anything that negatively impacts their business, and they don't have to.
	That's the craziest part of this.
	They are completely and utterly protected.
	They get to poison us and enrich themselves while doing it, and they will never, under the current laws, see justice for it.
	Dr. Marty McCary.
	The FDA's commissioner has been critical of COVID-19 vaccine boosters.
	He has indicated that he's received a primary series of one of the vaccines.
	Well, he seems like an intelligent individual if he really received it.
	But lots of places have been caught giving fake vaccinations.
	If you remember, I want to say it was in New Zealand.
	Maybe it was even Australia where we just talked about.
	But I remember they were caught injecting people with saline.
	We're going to move on from that because that is the essence of it.
	FDA official says, I didn't take it, and I don't regret not taking it.
	My fears were borne out.
	This is on The Defender, Children's Health Defense News and Views.
	This is by Michael Nevradakis, PhD.
	Another study shows higher miscarriage rate among women who received COVID vaccines.
	That's right.
	It has a long litany of potential side effects.
	Some of which are probably still not even understanding to this day.
	It is, again, hard to establish causality between these, especially when the side effects are so strange and varied.
	The author of the peer-reviewed study said their findings reinforce the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination.
	However, scientists said the study adds to mounting evidence that the vaccines haven't been proven safe for pregnant women.
	That's right.
	In this article, they explain that the people who did the study downplay what it does to pregnant women.
	They say it's still mostly safe.
	They focus on other aspects of it because that's what they do.
	Even if you get a negative outcome in your study, you can still focus on other parts of it and try to bury the negative side effects or the negative aspects of it under a mountain of other data.
	Among a group of pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19, the women who received a COVID-19 vaccine were significantly more likely to miscarry compared to women who didn't get a COVID-19 vaccine, according to a new peer-reviewed study.
	However, the authors said their findings reinforce the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women.
	That's right.
	It's still so important to get the vaccine.
	It might kill your baby, but you don't want to get COVID.
	The study by six Spanish researchers was published last week in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, a Springer journal.
	The researchers retrospectively examined a sample of 156 pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19 during pregnancy between 2020 and 2022.
	Of these, 45 women had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose.
	Among the vaccinated group, six women, 13.3%, had miscarriages, with five of the miscarriages occurring in women who were vaccinated in the first or second trimester of pregnancy.
	Five miscarriages were recorded among the larger group, 111 of unvaccinated women resulting in a miscarriage rate of 4.5%.
	That's right, so instead of 4.5%, It was up to 13.3%, nearly a 10% increase.
	That is a very, very significant statistical jump.
	According to trial site news, the higher miscarriage rate among vaccinated women in the first two trimesters is a concerning anomaly.
	That's right.
	It's just a concerning anomaly.
	It's just random.
	We don't know why it happened.
	It's strange.
	That raises the need for more robust trimester stratified safety analyses.
	This is...
	These people are utterly despicable.
	They can see that the miscarriage rate jumps by 10% that it is harming children.
	And all they can say is, oh, well, that's concerning.
	We need to look at this.
	We need to study this more.
	It should be an immediate panic button.
	Stop.
	And remember that the latest version of what the vaccine does is that it reduces the symptoms that you have when you get COVID, allegedly.
	So, it doesn't reduce your chance of getting it, but, you know, if you get it, it'll be not as bad as if you hadn't had the vaccine.
	So, therefore, it's still safe and effective even if it kills your child.
	You won't have as bad a cold, probably.
	Yeah.
	You wouldn't want the cold to be a little bit worse, so take this poison that may kill your child.
	It will increase your risk by nearly 10%.
	That is, again, that is terrifying.
	That is a...
	That is a large statistical jump.
	Like I said, they focus on what they want to and are very, very glib and short about the negatives.
	It is another way they lie.
	They simply ignore it or downplay it.
	If the authors are willing to stand by their work, then they should have stated that a COVID-19 infection in the two trimesters is 15 times more likely to result in a miscarriage if the mother was vaccinated.
	The strongest statistical significance in the entire study.
	That's right, 15 times more likely.
	I've got a comment here from B. My Valentine.
	Doctors and nurses are actually trained how to talk to parents with vaccine hesitancy.
	They make parents feel like the worst parent in the world if they do not comply.
	Yes, they badger, they bully, they belittle.
	Another B, B, B. Instead of build back better, badger, bully, belittle.
	And again, I'm very thankful the doctor we were going to did none of that.
	They simply asked and we said no.
	They're like, okay.
	And they moved on.
	They haven't asked since.
	I imagine they may at some point, but they haven't in the multiple times we've been back.
	And I'm very thankful for that.
	Not that I let my guard down.
	It is important that just because they seem to respect your choices, You know, go all happy-go-lucky and assume that they are going to respect it in perpetuity and that every nurse or doctor at the clinic is on the same page.
	But I'm very thankful for our doctor.
	A good friend recommended them, so very thankful for that.
	And we are still looking for a doctor in the Tennessee area that will see him unvaccinated.
	That is what has been worrying us about this.
	The doctor we see is down in Texas.
	I have a comment from Dad about the FDA official who admitted that she didn't get the vaccine because she was pregnant, even though they were recommending it to pregnant women.
	It says, isn't it amazing that the FDA official has no shame and faces no consequences for not getting the experimental shot that they lied to people about, but they demanded that medical professionals get it or they lose their career.
	There will be no consequences for her or the cheerleading media like Breitbart or Infowars.
	For this obvious crime.
	That is right.
	They are able to freely come out and admit these things and nothing happens while they pushed it and forced it on the people beneath them in the power structure.
	They told nurses that they had to get it or they would lose their jobs or those in the military.
	Jason Barker, of course, he had to opt out of it.
	People will continue to cheer Trump, even though his second administration is pushing AI-created mRNA.
	That's right.
	Trump is the father of the vaccine, folks.
	It is laid right at his feet.
	The unknown number of deaths, but it is a large, large number.
	We may never know the full extent, but it is an astronomical number of people that have died or been harmed by them.
	And they are all at the feet of Trump.
	He abdicated his rule to Anthony Fauci and said, I trust you, at minimum, and then claimed, And gave Fauci a medal for it.
	That's right.
	Audi MRR, a concerning anomaly.
	Such BS.
	How do these people sleep?
	I imagine they sleep on a giant pile of money.
	Much like a dragon would.
	They have seared their conscience.
	They do not care about the damage it does.
	They are simply looking to enrich themselves.
	Or they have a clockwork mind that does not care about the suffering of people and simply wish to find out fun little factoids about these things.
	Isn't that interesting?
	We'll need to do more studies.
	I'll have to do more studies on why it aborts children.
	Isn't that interesting?
	I'll have to inject more pregnant women.
	That is how some of these people think.
	It is simply a curiosity to them.
	Your life means nothing, and if they have to sacrifice you on the altar of science for them to find out some meaningless little factoid, they would do it in a heartbeat.
	Well, we have been talking about vaccines and COVID for a while now.
	And it is starting to get me a little depressed.
	So perhaps we will take a quick break.
	And when we come back, I think, you know, we're going to talk about Christy, Noem, and Habeas Corpus.
	I'd like to say, Habeas Corpus?
	I hardly know him.
	you you You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	While I cut that one off a little bit short, my finger accidentally hit the button.
	That's why I shouldn't hover over it.
	But welcome back, folks.
	Hope you're still enjoying the show.
	And as I said, we're going to talk about Christy Noem and Habeas Corpus.
	Habeas Corpus, as I'm sure all of you are aware, is about preventing the government from unlawfully detaining you indefinitely.
	It's about making sure that they have a reason to, not just because they don't like you.
	It's show me the body, or you shall see the body, as in show me what law I violated and why I'm being held.
	But Christy Noem couldn't answer that.
	She went on a little bit of a rant.
	Well, not necessarily a rant, but she stumbled over her words.
	This is on Axios.
	Noem botches habeas corpus questions at Senate hearing.
	Oh, she didn't have a great answer for why, you know, they can just arrest people without any charges.
	Who would have thought that these people don't understand the rule of law?
	It's a shocker to me.
	They are so good about it, usually.
	Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem botched questions about habeas corpus at a Senate hearing Tuesday.
	Falsely asserting the check on the government's power to detain people actually gives President Trump a constitutional right to conduct deportations.
	Why it matters.
	Top Trump advisor Stephen Miller recently floated the idea of suspending habeas corpus if courts impede the administration's efforts to deport immigrants.
	Driving the news, Noam was asked about habeas corpus during a Senate hearing Tuesday.
	Habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from his country, Noam said.
	It is amazing that she got this so, so wrong.
	How does she not understand this in even the slightest?
	And both of these people are twisting it.
	It's not about deportations.
	It's about, you know, putting these people in prison for very long sentences and really horrific prisons without any trial.
	Yes, that's right.
	It is about making sure that the government does not unlawfully detain or incarcerate you.
	Because you don't need to suspend habeas corpus for deportations if someone's here illegally.
	The body of law that they have violated is obvious.
	They came here illegally.
	If they are illegal, then there is a clear law that they have violated.
	That does not need habeas corpus suspended.
	Only if you're giving these people over to, forget the name of the prison, as MS-13 members when you don't know whether or not they actually are MS-13 members, or if they've committed any crimes.
	Yeah, it's in the name, folks.
	If they're here illegally, they can just be removed.
	You don't need to send them to the deepest, darkest dungeon you can find.
	Just send them back wherever they came from.
	If they won't tell you, pick a random spot.
	See, my entire...
	I think this would make a...
	And it'd be a lot more compelling if instead Trump just had a big old cannon on the border with a string that he could pull and just launch them back over.
	Each time he pulls the string, he would just say, you're fired.
	good.
	That's my pitch for the immigration problem.
	Just fire them out of a cannon, back over the border.
	You're fired.
	Habeas corpus is the legal principle that requires that the government provide a public reason for detaining and imprisoning people.
	If not for that protection, the government could simply arrest people, including American citizens, and hold them indefinitely for no reason.
	That is the essence of it.
	Comment from Dad.
	You would have expected Christy Noem to have thought that habeas corpus was a line of clothing.
	That is right.
	Good old Christy Noem, former governor of South Dakota.
	And this is on Mediaite by Alex Griffin.
	DHS Secretary Christy Noem confidently bombs question about habeas corpus in shocking hearing exchange.
	Senator Maggie Hassan.
	Grilled Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a Tuesday Senate hearing over the possibility of President Donald Trump suspending habeas corpus to continue mass deportations without due process, something his top aide Stephen Miller has suggested doing.
	Again, he doesn't need to suspend habeas corpus to deport people.
	He needs to suspend habeas corpus to imprison them indefinitely in these hellish conditions that he has been sending them to.
	And even if you don't care about the immigrants being sent there, This is an extremely dangerous precedent.
	If you suspend habeas corpus, that means they can just detain anyone.
	Well, again...
	This is a violation of human rights.
	It's not something anyone should be supporting.
	Yes, it violates human rights.
	And again, they do not...
	No matter what they say, they do not have the right to do that, but they do have the power.
	And...
	Once you have the power, you can effectively do whatever you want unless people say no.
	You have to stand up and say no, or the government just does whatever they see fit.
	So, Secretary Noem, what is habeas corpus?
	Hassan began her line of questioning.
	Well, habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country and suspend their right to, Noem replied, as Hassan jumped in to clarify.
	Let me stop you, ma 'am, Hassan said as Noem continued.
	Habeas corpus, excuse me, that...
	That's incorrect, Hassan declared, as no man insisted that President Lincoln used it.
	Good old President Lincoln.
	We're big fans of President Lincoln here on the David Knight Show.
	We love us some good old Abe Lincoln.
	He wasn't a tyrant at all.
	He didn't sacrifice so many American men simply to maintain and consolidate his power base.
	It wasn't an assault on the Constitution at all.
	He was a good boy who didn't do anything wrong.
	Habeas corpus, excuse me, that's incorrect, Hassan declared.
	Excuse me, habeas corpus is the legal principle that requires that the government provide a public reason for detaining and imprisoning people, Hassan explained, adding.
	If not for that protection, the government could simply arrest people, including American citizens, and hold them indefinitely for no reason.
	And once again, they do not have the right to do this.
	No matter if they suspend habeas corpus or not, they should not have it, but they would have.
	Habeas corpus is the foundational right that separates free societies like America from police states like North Korea As a senator from the live free or die state, this matters a lot to me and my constituents and to all Americans.
	So, Secretary Noem, do you support the core protection that habeas corpus provides and the government must provide a public reason in order to detain and imprison someone?
	That's right.
	Show me the body.
	Show me the law I have violated and explain why you are detaining and imprisoning me.
	Yeah, I support habeas corpus.
	I also recognize that the President of the United States has the authority under the Constitution to decide if it should be suspended or not.
	Let us be clear, though, that this President, Noam continued as the son jumped to add, "...it has never been done without approval of Congress.
	Even Abraham Lincoln got retroactive approval." Yes, well, I mean, retroactive approval is worthless in my opinion.
	That's kind of like being like, oh, yeah, we approve.
	That's us.
	He wouldn't have done it without us.
	That's just kind of a...
	C-Y-A moment.
	Got another article about this from Reason.
	It's by Billy Binion.
	What Christy Noem gets wrong about habeas corpus, and I think it's safe to say she gets everything wrong about habeas corpus.
	Like Dad said, she probably thought it was a clothing line.
	The legal principle safeguards civil liberties, protecting even unpopular people from the government.
	That's right, if they can.
	Get rid of you simply because they don't like you.
	Well, they don't like any of us.
	They want us all gone.
	They would round us all up and throw us into the El Salvadoran prison if they could.
	And if we let them do it to these people, they will very, very rapidly expand it to others as well.
	You make a tweet critical of Israel.
	Well, into the gulag, friend.
	Into the gulag you go.
	Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a congressional hearing on Tuesday had a contentious exchange about habeas corpus, constitutional right that allows people to challenge their imprisonment in court.
	He goes on to recap what we just read, so I'm going to move down further.
	Habeas corpus is fundamental civil liberty.
	It effectively forces the state to justify why it is detaining someone.
	It is by definition a check on the government, not a right it possesses.
	The government doesn't possess rights.
	The government doesn't have rights.
	It has powers.
	That's a key difference.
	No one is likely aware of this.
	The Homeland Security and Secretary told lawmakers at a congressional hearing last week that immigration levels may justify suspending the protection, giving her the benefit of the doubt.
	That it's possible she meant to imply today that President Donald Trump needs to subvert that right in order to deport.
	Well, a lot of things Abraham Lincoln did were unconstitutional.
	Viewing the exchange in a light most favorable to Noem, it generally comports with the administration's position.
	Stephen Miller, the White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, said earlier this month that Trump is actively looking at suspending habeas corpus for migrants.
	The President of the United States, Noem said later in the hearing today, has the authority under the Constitution to decide if it should be suspended or not.
	And again, that is not true either.
	If it is to be suspended, Congress has to be involved.
	It is not something you can unilaterally decide.
	But again, we have seen Congress continually abdicate its power to the executive branch and even the judicial branch.
	Congress loves to just collect a check.
	Love to take your rights, but they also don't like being held accountable or seen as being the ones behind it.
	But that is highly constitutionally dubious, as reasons Jacob Solem wrote last week, for a few reasons.
	The first, the clause that allows for its suspension, the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, shall not be suspended unless, when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it, is found in Article I of the Constitution, which governs Congress.
	The executive powers are outlined in Article II, again, as he points out.
	The Constitution implies that this is...
	A power of Congress.
	Not just implies, but puts it in the section outlining Congress's powers.
	Guard Goldsmith.
	Good to see you, Guard.
	I hope you're doing well.
	And again, Liberty Conspiracy and Guard Goldsmith on Substack.
	Check him out.
	You can also find him on MRC TV.
	Miss Noem seems oblivious to the principle of habeas, but others around her know better and are incredibly devious, destroying the right.
	Yes, Christy Noem may be an idiot that just doesn't know anything, but the people around her, not all of them, Then there is the justification the Trump administration would have to invoke that the
	U.S. is experiencing an invasion.
	That public safety is endangered so severely that it requires suspending a core constitutional protection.
	Whatever your views on immigration, the reference to invasion, as Selim notes, has historically been understood, including in the court's reference literal warfare and military attack, for example.
	That is right.
	The public safety invocation would likewise be extremely tenuous, particularly when considering, for example, the Supreme Court's ruling That's right, you have human rights.
	If we have rights at all, they come from God.
	They are not granted to us from daddy government.
	They come from God and cannot be taken from you by any man.
	If terrorism suspects are entitled to these petitions, then it stands to reason.
	So should people like Rumesa Ozturk, the Tufts student, who was recently released from detention after a federal judge ruled the government, had provided no evidence for her imprisonment other than she co-authored a pro-Palestinian op-ed.
	That's right.
	Again, you make a tweet critical of Israel, or you make a post saying good things about Palestine, then they are going to throw you into prison.
	That's how they like to operate.
	Well, I think we'll take another quick break.
	I love hearing the music, and I know you all do too.
	So, we'll take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to look at perhaps some buyer's remorse on the MAGA side, at least when it comes to Dan Bongino.
	Oh, we have a comment from Audi MRR before we go.
	Can't believe that MAGA tards can't see that both parties manufactured this crisis to give government a constitutional loophole.
	That's right.
	Basically...
	Anything we're dealing with today has been manufactured by those in power.
	At minimum, they have let it progress to a crisis point so that they can use it.
	We see that over and over again.
	Whether they directly cause it or just let it happen, they then utilize it for their own agenda.
	But we are going to take a quick break.
	If you want a drastic measure to stop the immigration invasion, how about stopping the welfare checks to illegals?
	You know, that would...
	Do a lot more than stopping the human rights to illegals.
	Yeah, they could just cut off their privileges, which they are not entitled to.
	Now, of course, you wouldn't get rid of all of them, but it would drastically reduce the number of people coming, and it would be more easy to address.
	Poor here might be better than being poor where they are, so you're not going to stop everyone with that method, but it would be an amazing first step, and they would have all the rights in the world to do that.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	When we come back, we're going to look at people upset with Dan Bongino and his take on Jeffrey Epstein.
	So, stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	PIANO PLAYS
	PIANO PLAYS You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back, folks.
	I really like that bumper as well.
	It's very, very peaceful.
	And that is very fitting because it is labeled here as Grace Peace.
	And my dad has made some truly beautiful pieces of music over the years.
	His covers of things are so well put together, so well orchestrated.
	And again, I want to ask that you continue to pray for healing for him.
	Pray for a...
	Full recovery and a quick recovery.
	We are so glad to have him home.
	We are so thankful that the Lord answered our prayers in that regard.
	So we just ask you continue to pray because we know he answers prayers.
	He already has.
	I consider it a miracle.
	And we have seen so many examples of that in our life.
	It has been truly amazing how God has protected our family over the years.
	So just keep praying.
	We will keep praying as well.
	And we are so thankful for all of you.
	We thank you so much for that.
	Got more comments from Audi.
	First will be the Mexicans, then the anti-vaxxers, then the anti-trans.
	Yes, they will come for anyone that opposes their agenda in due time.
	And more from Audi.
	Public welfare has always been the alibi of tyrants.
	Albert Camas.
	Yes.
	They will always say it's for the greater good, for the public good, and then they will stick the knife in your back.
	Dougalug.
	Good to see you, Doug.
	Hope you're doing well.
	I'm surprised that we expect the Trump government to uphold the Constitution.
	Well, I, for one, don't.
	But, you know, some people fool me once, shame on you.
	Fool me twice.
	Fool me ten times.
	Fool me a thousand times.
	Who knows how many times.
	Fool me once, can't get fooled again as a...
	As a, uh, I suppose, I don't know what you would call George W. Bush a sage.
	Anyway, Guard Goldsmith, the 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments require due process to prohibit punishment without it.
	Yes, Guard Goldsmith is very...
	Guard and my dad are two of the most knowledgeable, probably the most knowledgeable people I've ever met when it comes to constitutionality and the rule of law.
	So, again, go check out Guard.
	Great, great guy.
	Lots of very interesting knowledge.
	Paleo Armory.
	He was the Patriot Act under that they can black bag and detain anyone indefinitely for any reason and don't have to explain.
	I actually have a story here.
	I believe it was a female congressman who was looking to repeal the Patriot Act or was introducing legislation to repeal it.
	So maybe we'll cover that here in a minute.
	More from Paleo.
	Habeas corpus is from the Magna Carta.
	Magna Carta gave us many, many of the fundamental principles we have taken for granted over the years.
	And of course, that was established after they beat the king at Hastings in 1066, if memory serves.
	I believe that's when it happened, but I could be wrong.
	And as I said, we're going to look at some of these comments that people have left under Dan Bongino just towing the party line when it comes to the death of Jeffrey Epstein, or the alleged death.
	We don't know what happened.
	We have, we saw We're not even sure he's dead.
	He could very well be on an island somewhere, still doing terrible, terrible things.
	And of course, we're going to just look at these comments.
	Wemmy.
	This is from two days ago.
	I don't believe them, Epstein.
	This was regarding Kash Patel and Dan Bongino saying, again, that Epstein, the story, the official story is true.
	The Epstein thing seems like it's at the center of everything, and no one on either side wants the truth to be known.
	That's right.
	They both play the same game on the same side, and they want to make sure they don't get caught, so they will tow the party line.
	For us, B, every day that passes, I realize I fell from Bongino's shtick.
	In reality, it's looking like he's a hopium salesman like Hannity, but he swears and wears tight t-shirts.
	Yes, again, some buyer's remorse we're seeing.
	We're just going to keep going through these comments, and I'll call it the ones I think interesting.
	I really like Dan Bongino as a podcaster and political commentator.
	I'm having a difficult time staying behind him as a deputy director of the FBI.
	He's obviously no Tom Horman.
	We were promised.
	That cutesy time was over.
	We were told that the corrupt leadership of the FBI had to be dismantled.
	We were led to believe that the mission of the FBI was to be redirected.
	We've seen nothing but grandstanding and heard a lot of rhetoric coupled with some bad decisions.
	Not the least of which is that Patel and Bongino promoted Steven Jensen to ADIC over the Washington field office.
	You know, the guy who oversaw...
	The weaponization of the FBI against January Sixers and led the charge against traditional Catholics and parents who spoke out at school board meetings.
	That guy!
	Why did that guy get promoted to one of the most powerful positions in the FBI?
	Well, we know why they did that.
	Because they play for the same team, folks.
	They're on the same side.
	They are all part of the same administration.
	Got a comment here.
	Franson, Travis, have you heard about the vax politic in Singapore?
	They'll fine you and throw you in jail if you don't take it.
	No, I can't say I have.
	I haven't seen them talking about that.
	To be fair, I've been focused mainly on American news.
	I haven't looked too closely at what's going on around the world recently.
	I'll have to look into that, though.
	Thank you for bringing that to my attention, Francine.
	But yes, Singapore, it's a very, very strict country.
	Very, very authoritarian.
	Very totalitarian.
	Treat their citizens like cattle there.
	They have very, very strict rules regarding just about everything.
	And like we saw back in 2020, it starts with the most authoritarian countries, but this is a global plan.
	They are all reading from the same playbook.
	Yes.
	It starts with places like Singapore and moves out from there.
	But yes, I believe it is Singapore where they have a very, very bustling tech sector, one of the richest cities in the world.
	I want to say, I don't remember the name of it, but it's got rooftop gardens and all kinds of things.
	But it is incredibly authoritarian.
	They, again, treat their citizens like cattle, and citizens enjoy very few rights.
	I remain hopeful that Patel and Bongino get things back on track.
	Why would you remain hopeful?
	Why?
	That is my question for ID Sergeant 56. What have they done besides Releasing documents pertaining to things that happened decades ago is interesting.
	There may be some relevance to today, but holding people who are still around and active in what's happening today accountable for crimes they have committed is far more important.
	But most...
	Important is what will be done to safeguard American citizens in the future.
	It is time for an overhaul of the FBI.
	It's time for Patel and Bongino to get moving in that direction.
	Well, yes.
	Get on with fulfilling the promises that were made, but we just...
	We know that they aren't going to.
	It has all been a show and a...
	Way for them to gin up support and grift.
	But we see people in the comments are slowly beginning to realize they've been had.
	They...
	I don't...
	The fact is, though, that they are seeing it with Dan Bongino and they're seeing it with Kash Patel, but none of them that I saw, none of the comments that...
	I looked at and I scrolled through quite a few of them last night and both now as well.
	None of them lay the blame where it truly belongs at Donald Trump's feet.
	He is the one who said, you know, he's...
	We're going to put good people, people you can trust into them, people who are going to do what the American people want, and they never do.
	So either Trump is incompetent or Trump is incompetent.
	He's lying, and he's a part of the same system these other people are.
	And in fact, he could very well be both.
	But people don't like to take it that far.
	They like to pretend that Donald Trump is a hero, that he is going to save them, and that it's simply, he got fooled, folks.
	He got fooled.
	He didn't realize that the people he put into these positions were bad.
	Truly.
	He has bragged over and over again about how good he is at hiring people, but we've seen none of that.
	This is a story on Mediaite.
	It's by Joe DiPaolo.
	Elon Musk says he wouldn't let Bill Gates babysit his kids because of Epstein ties and scorched earth attack.
	Billionaire fight.
	Billionaire fight.
	You guys excited?
	saying mean words at each other.
	Elon Musk went scorched earth on his burgeoning rival Bill Gates on Tuesday, even going so far as to call out Microsoft's co-founder ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
	Has he ever said anything about those pictures of Trump with Jeffrey Epstein?
	Has he ever said a single thing about that?
	Yeah, I really have to wonder how much of this is, you know, him concerned about children and how much of it is him concerned about Bill Gates shorting his Tesla stock.
	Bill Gates owns a huge short position on Tesla.
	Yeah, again, this is a billionaire fight.
	They're saying mean words at each other because they are both deeply invested in anti-human technology, but perhaps they have different ideas on ways to go about it.
	They are just quibbling over the methods with which to enslave and destroy us.
	that's as deep as it goes with these folks speaking via satellite with the bbc's michael hussein at the cutter economic forum the tesla boss teed off on gates who in a cnn interview on may 9th blasted doge's gutting of usaid saying it results in millions of deaths he's a huge liar must said in response that's terrible must then followed it by taking a huge personal shot at the microsoft co-founder who does bill gates think he is to make comments about the welfare of children given
	And again, these are valid...
	Valid criticisms.
	These are valid things to question and say about Bill Gates.
	However, Musk is not the man to do it.
	He freely associates with Donald Trump and many others who were probably a member of Jeffrey Epstein's cabal.
	The government is loaded with people that were friends with him.
	But he won't say anything about him.
	Won't say anything about those people.
	Won't comment on Trump being photographed with Epstein, spending time with Epstein.
	Who does Bill Gates think he is to make comments about the welfare of children, given that he was close friends with Jeffrey Epstein?
	Musk added, I wouldn't want that guy to babysit my kid, I can tell you that.
	The remarks Tuesday are just the latest salvo.
	What has become a nasty feud between the two moguls in a May 8th interview with the Financial Times, Gates said of Musk, the picture of the world's richest man killing the world's poorest children is not a pretty one.
	He also called Musk's support of far-right world leaders insane excrement.
	Last July, Musk called for more scrutiny of the Gates Foundation, a philanthropic organization founded by Gates and his wife, Melinda French Gates.
	That's right, the billionaires are feuding.
	They're trying to decide who will get to enslave, control, and eventually kill you.
	They want to be the one that pulls the trigger.
	That is what this is about.
	So, you know, I think now we might take a look at what's going on with gold and stablecoins, because this is another aspect of control.
	The government is pushing for crypto not because they like it or because they want to give you freedom, but because the crypto they are pushing is going to give them a way to track and trace you continually.
	This is an article on Zero Hedge, authored by Brayden Landrea of Cointelegraph.
	U.S. Senate moves forward with a genius stablecoin bill.
	The U.S. Senate has voted to advance a key stablecoin-regulating bill after Democratic senators blocked an earlier attempt to move the bill forward over concerns about President Donald Trump's sprawling crypto empire.
	And again, this is because they want a central bank digital currency that they can track, control, and trace at all times so that they can shut off your ability to make purchases with the push of a button.
	If you actually have even the fiat cash in your hand, you can potentially make purchases without them being involved.
	But if you have to use their central bank digital currency, their trackable, traceable currency, Several Democrats, including Mark Warner, Adam Schiff, and Ruben Gallego, changed their votes to pass the motion to invoke cloture, which will now set the bill up for debate on the Senate floor.
	Republican Senator Cynthia Loomis, one of the bill's key, Backers said on May 15th that she thinks it's a fair target to have the Genius Act passed by May 26, Memorial Day in the U.S. They are moving fast on this, folks.
	They want it bad.
	The U.S. Senate voted 66-32 to advance the debate on the Genius Stablecoin bill.
	Several Democratic senators withdrew support for the bill on May, blocking a motion to move it forward, citing concerns over potential conflicts of interest involving Trump's crypto ventures and the bill's anti-money laundering.
	That's right.
	Trump's family has been pulling some crypto shenanigans.
	They've been starting their own cryptos, which has enriched them quite a bit.
	They have made a lot of money hyping up their own cryptocurrencies and getting people to buy in.
	Warner expressed concerns about...
	Trump's crypto ventures in a statement before the vote, but said the U.S. couldn't afford to keep standing on the sidelines while the crypto industry evolves.
	That's right.
	We've got to get in there, and we've got to make sure we are in control of it.
	We have to make sure that we own it, that we are the ones who are able to track, trace, and control every purchase you make.
	We cannot allow that corruption to blind us to the broader reality.
	Blockchain technology is here to stay.
	If American lawmakers don't shape it, others will, and not in ways that serve our interests or democratic values.
	Well, I don't think that they're going to serve our democratic values by any law they pass, but I do think they will serve their own interests.
	They will make sure that they are able to utilize whatever crypto they bring in, as I said, a CBDC.
	It will be a fully Orwellian nightmare where they are able to monitor every purchase you make.
	And again, this next article is also on Zero Hedge.
	Future slide yields and gold jump as market reacts to Moody's downgrade.
	Of course, Moody does credit rankings of countries and all kinds of things, so they have downgraded.
	The U.S. U.S. equity futures and bond yields are sharply higher across the curve as market reacts to Moody's greatly delayed downgrade to U.S. credit on Friday.
	It follows 14 years after S&P did the same in August 2011, with USD trading broadly lower, gold higher, and macro credit trading notably wider.
	As of 8 a.m. Eastern Time, S&P 500 contracts fell 1%, and NASDAQ 100 futures down 1.4%.
	With investors cooling on equities after a five-day winning streak and up seven of the past eight days.
	Pre-market mega cap tech names are down two to four percent with semis slash cyclicals under pressure.
	Again, the U.S. economy is a house of cards.
	Everyone knows it.
	They are simply waiting to see what happens.
	They have been more than willing to make money or make hay while the sun shines and while it is being propped up.
	But they're looking at it and they're thinking, I don't think it can stand much longer.
	Something has got to give somewhere.
	So people are beginning to worry.
	They know that it is going to fall eventually.
	And they're looking at it and thinking, the fall might be coming sooner rather than later.
	The yield curve is bear steepening with the 30-year yield surpassing 5% and hitting its highest level since November 2023.
	USD selling off.
	The euro rose as base as much as 1.1% as all major currencies advanced against the greenback.
	We are seeing again the edge of the United States hegemony that was established post-World War II with Bretton Woods in 1944.
	It has been a long time coming, but it might finally be here.
	The United States enjoyed an enormous amount of prosperity post-World War II.
	World War II forced us to spool up our infrastructure and our manufacturing base, and because we were not attached to Europe, it was very, very hard for anyone to bomb us and destroy that infrastructure.
	So while Europe had to focus on rebuilding, we didn't have to worry about any of that.
	We had basically free reign.
	We had a booming economy and were able to do whatever we wanted.
	But that time, it seems, has passed.
	The post-war era is finally ending and new powers are rising.
	It is an interesting time.
	And this, speaking of interesting, is a very interesting article.
	It's about Missouri.
	And it is on Yahoo from the Kansas City Star.
	Missourians could soon pay with gold and silver after lawmakers approve odd.
	Yes, it's an odd bill.
	Very odd.
	This is written by Kacen Bayless.
	Shoppers in Kansas City and across Missouri could soon be able to pay for their groceries and pay taxes with gold and silver.
	It never ceases to amaze me that Kansas City is in Missouri.
	It continually throws me off.
	Missouri lawmakers this week in a move that surprised some approved a controversial bill that would make gold and silver legal tender in the state.
	The legislation which passed both chambers of the General Assembly as an amendment to a sweeping finance-related bill is headed to Republican Governor Mike Kehoe's desk.
	The Republican-led legislation would require state government entities to accept electronic versions of gold and silver, called ESC, electronic specie currency, as forms of payment for taxes and public debts, while the measures would not require businesses to accept gold and silver as payment for private uses, such as groceries, it would allow them to do so.
	That's right, it could force the government to accept gold and silver, or at least electronic gold and silver.
	Green T369 got a comment from, unless there is a completely non-digital, physically tradable currency, it's a setup for tracking.
	That's right.
	They can track any electronic purchase you make.
	If you use your credit card, they can track you.
	And if you use a central bank crypto, they can track you.
	And realistically, they can probably track a lot of other cryptos as well.
	Anything that's on the internet will eventually be cracked and figured out and hacked.
	If it's attached to the internet, it is not safe.
	It is not secure.
	It might be secure for a time, but it will eventually be broken into.
	Paleo Armory.
	Those gold-backed bills would come in very handy.
	I love them.
	That's right, and you can get your gold-backed bills, your other gold and silver needs, from Tony Arterburn by going through davidknight.gold.
	If you go to davidknight.gold, you can sign up for wolfpack.gold, and it lets Tony know you came through us.
	And for those unaware, gold-backed bills are bills that are the size and shape of paper bills, but they've just got a very thin foil of gold with a few dollars worth of gold for each of them.
	That's right.
	I believe they have strands of gold interwoven through the bill itself.
	So they're very interesting, and they actually have some gold.
	In them, which is to say they are real money.
	They are backed by something.
	So, goldbacks are goldbacked.
	Isn't that cool?
	But yes, if you live in Missouri, you may soon be able to pay for things using gold and silver, and the government would be forced to accept gold and silver if this passes, and businesses could opt into it, which, that's actually very, very cool.
	I like to see that.
	I like to see these things happening.
	On more financial News.
	This is from Bloomberg.
	Pulled it up on the archive.
	But DC's Smithsonian loses AAA rating after U.S. credit downgrade.
	That's right.
	Even the Smithsonian is getting hit.
	Their credit's not what it used to be.
	They're going to repossess all the dinosaur bones.
	They're taking back the airplanes, folks.
	They're going back to wherever they came from.
	No, I'm kidding.
	But the Smithsonian Institution, the world's largest museum complex, boasting 21 museums in the National Zoo, has lost its top-tier credit rank for Moody's rating just days after the firm stripped the U.S. government of its last AAA rating.
	The organization's downgrade to AA-1 from AAA reflects the material funding and government linkages being between the Smithsonian and the United States government.
	Analysts led by Dennis...
	Gephardt said the relationship with the federal government leaves the Smithsonian vulnerable to federal government budget shutdowns or delays and links the credit quality to that of the U.S. government.
	That's right.
	Anything the federal government funds, when the federal government loses its money, all of these places lose it as well.
	So even the Smithsonian is not safe from the reckless spending and the comeuppance we are seeing.
	I think we will take another quick break, and when we come back, I want to talk a little bit about the faith.
	Oh, wait, we have a comment from Paleo Armory again.
	In the future, all black market deals, especially drugs, guns, etc., will be transacted in gold.
	And of course, black market deals in the future might also include things like eggs.
	Yes, they may include things like eggs.
	But if you're paying for your drugs and guns with gold...
	That almost makes you a pirate, so maybe invest in a sailing ship now.
	Just don't ram it into the Brooklyn Bridge, folks.
	We'll be right back.
	PIANO PLAYS
	PIANO PLAYS Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, folks.
	So glad you are still here with us.
	And as I said, we're going to take a bit of a look at what's going on with the church in this last segment.
	And this will be our last segment because, again, in the third hour we are going to play some clips from previous shows of my dad.
	This is The David Knight Show.
	And we are going to make sure that you still get David Knight in The David Knight Show.
	So, in the third hour, we've got quite a host of excellent, excellent material from previous shows, whether it's judicial overreach or how Christian ethics are fundamental to the liberties we now enjoy or the CIA running the government.
	Bill Gates or Trump.
	We've got it covered, and we will be playing that for you.
	So you can look forward to that.
	And before we get to faith, I want to do a little shameless grifting here.
	So if you would like to support us, you can go to davidknightshow.com forward slash subscribestar, and you can subscribe monthly.
	We have many different tiers.
	You can pick one that fits your budget if it fits your budget.
	And as before, you can go to davidknight.gold, subscribe through us to Wolfpack or just one-time purchases.
	This lets Tony know you came through us.
	And you can start getting outside of the fiat system.
	Trendsjournal.com.
	You can use promo code KNIGHT.
	That means it brings it down to about $250 a week.
	Trends Journal is an incredible publication.
	Gerald Salente works very, very hard on that.
	And again, if you use promo code Knight when you sign up, you get 10% off.
	You can also contribute through Zelle if you search the David Knight Show or davidknightshow.com, ProtonMail.
	Anyway, through Zelle, davidknightshow at protonmail.com.
	That is how you find us there.
	We also have Cash App, we have a P.O. Box, and we have a crypto wallet or a crypto address on the website.
	If you would like to subscribe on Subscribestar, that'd be great.
	If you'd like to tip on Rumble, that would be fantastic.
	Or subscribe on Kick.
	We really do appreciate all the support, and that's enough about that.
	We have another comment from Paleo Armory.
	It's about the gold backs I was just talking about.
	It's gold impregnated with clear plastic.
	They look like laminated gold leaf, but like a printed paper bill, but shiny gold, slightly shorter than a dollar bill.
	They are.
	I've never actually gotten to hold one personally, but I've seen pictures of them.
	They look very, very nifty.
	So, goldbacks are cool and interesting.
	I've always personally been a fan of coins myself.
	I've always liked to collect them.
	But we're going to real quickly hit a couple of faith headlines that I thought were interesting and worth looking at before we have to jump out right around 11. So we've got about 6 minutes.
	This is on WorldNetDaily.
	No idea what we're doing.
	New worship song makes waves with bold embrace of theological confusion.
	From the early church hymns sung a cappella or perhaps accompanied by cymbals and flutes past Gregorian chants through the thundering pipe organ chords of J.S. Bach to the 1960s guitar and electric pianos than the current orchestrations backing up Christian church worship leaders, there have been a lot of changes musically.
	Not so much in the lyrics as the message from How Great Thou Art through Were You There When They Crucified My Lord to Bless the Lord, O My Soul, O My Soul, Worship His Holy Name.
	All have revolved around worship until now.
	Now, one church has unleashed a new inspirational course with the words, God bless the Christian, God bless the atheist, God bless the Muslim, God bless the rest of us.
	We have no idea what we're doing.
	The report at End Times headlines explains it reveals a dangerous drift into progressive praise.
	The tune apparently comes out of the Well Church in Gilbert, Arizona, the report said.
	Song's catchphrase is, we've got no idea what we're doing, and while the theme itself may be unintentionally honest, what follows is a troubling snapshot of what happens when worship untethers itself from biblical truth, the report said.
	Again, lyrics are, God bless the Christian, the atheist, the Muslim.
	God bless the rest of us.
	We've got no idea what we're doing.
	Let all our friends in and all our enemies, all of our children, all of our families, we've got no idea what we're doing.
	We've tried to find you throughout the centuries, different religions in different countries.
	We've got no idea what we're doing.
	And this also speaks not just to theological, well, definitely theological, but also this sort of universalism and the fact that, well, we're all trying to find God in our own way, and there's no one way to him.
	It's simply how best, whichever one works best for you to see him.
	This is literally a hymn of agnosticism.
	Yes.
	It is very sad to see this coming out of the church today.
	But there is only one way.
	It is Jesus Christ, the way, the truth, the life.
	And you need to give your life to him.
	You need to ask for forgiveness.
	And that is the truth of it.
	And this next article is on dissenter.
	And this is something...
	That I feel fairly passionate about is something I have noticed and been annoyed by.
	Dear effeminate pastor, here's why you're bleeding, men.
	And you can see the outfits that some of these pastors are wearing at the top.
	But, uh, Dear effeminate pastor, you stand on a stage, not a pulpit.
	Beneath theatrical lights, not the burning fire of truth, draped in pastel rebellion and accessorized like a department store mannequin on discount.
	You glide across the platform like a self-help seminar host with a theology degree from Instagram, and you wonder out loud why men won't darken your doorway.
	Yes, men are going back to church, which is lovely to see, but a lot of the reason they have hemorrhaged men over the past few years to decades is simply because it has become extremely, extremely effeminate.
	It has become incredibly, again, as he said, more like a self-help seminar.
	More about...
	Your feelings than about the truth of the gospel, the truth of the Bible.
	It has been diluted and dumbed down.
	We see a lot of that in worship as well.
	These sort of Jesus is my boyfriend lyrics, which are very, very uncomfortable at minimum to sing and possibly very theologically bad.
	There's that one song.
	I can't remember who does it.
	But we went to one church, and it's the one where they say, one of the lines is, sloppy wet kiss.
	And I viscerally cringed the first time I heard that line.
	I recoiled in horror because it was so unpleasant and theologically bad.
	But maybe we'll cover this article more tomorrow.
	But yes, the church has hemorrhaged men for years simply because it has diluted the gospel.
	It has become self-help.
	It has become extremely effeminate.
	They have continually, continually catered to the sort of book club aesthetic that appeals to a lot of women.
	But we are out of time for today for my segments.
	We, as I said, are going to play some great segments that my dad did previously for the last hour.
	I want to thank you all for joining us.
	Once again, ask you to continue praying for him.
	He's home.
	We're so happy.
	We're glad to have him back.
	Just please pray that he continues to recover and get better.
	And he's back on the air soon.
	Thank you all for joining us.
	I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You've got Musk saying, impeach that judge.
	You've got J.D. Vance saying, we've got executive authority here.
	And these judges don't have any authority in this area.
	More on that in just a moment.
	The Washington Post saying it's a constitutional crisis and saying that Trump has potentially broken law, steamrolled Congress, and has a billionaire donor trying to dismantle the U.S. government.
	as his administration taunts the authority of the courts to stop them in what appears to be a pursuit of some of the most expansive and aggressive presidential power in American history.
	Well, that brings up a question.
	All of government, the power of the purse resides with Congress, and they are the ones who initiate and approve all the spending bills.
	And so, the President isn't spending any new money, so he's not usurping that power of the Congress.
	Which is to spend the money.
	And so that brings up the question, since the executive is a manager, is he obliged to spend all of the money that has been budgeted for these things?
	I would say no.
	He's not making new money.
	I think we've had some of that with Biden and his largesse for Ukraine.
	But does he have to spend all the money that the Congress has allocated to these various bureaucracies?
	Or can he say, well, we're not going to do that.
	We're going to cut it back.
	Can he do that?
	I mean, so far he's not gotten rid of any agencies.
	He's just reducing the amount of money that they've been spending, that has been allocated to them.
	Seems to me like that's a legitimate constitutional thing to do.
	The Congress allocates the money, but...
	The executive doesn't have to spend the money that's been allocated to it.
	So the New York Times says, although there's no universally accepted definition of a constitutional crisis, Trump has created a constitutional crisis.
	Well, how do you know that if you have a definition for it?
	I don't know what a constitutional crisis is, but I'll know it when I can't define it, but I'll know it when I see it, just like pornography, right?
	The judge said about that.
	Pro publicos.
	It says, Trump's purge is a crisis that has tested the limits of the presidency.
	So, on CNN, they do have one conservative that they've got there, Scott Jennings.
	And he said, we do have a constitutional crisis.
	And the constitutional crisis is being caused by these judges.
	That's right.
	J.D. Vance is pushing back on this.
	He's talked about...
	Andrew Jackson.
	And then he said this.
	He wrote this on Sunday.
	He says, He's doing a lot of work here.
	But we do know that judges do get to say whether the executive is complying with the law or not.
	That's been the case for decades, hundreds of years.
	But still, the judiciary is micromanaging things.
	That's the point that J.D. Vance is making, and he's absolutely right about that.
	And he was very well stated, a very articulate argument here.
	He says there's a difference between saying whether you're complying with the law, And then you have these individual district court judges setting, effectively setting, broad federal policy that is specifically reserved for the President of the United States.
	I think we do have a constitutional crisis, and it's being caused by these judges.
	They're not here to tell us how to spend the money.
	They're not here to set broad federal policy, he said.
	That's Scott Jennings at CNN.
	Referring to the tweet that was put out by J.D. Vance.
	Judges don't get to tell a general how to conduct a military operation.
	They don't get to tell the attorney general how to use her powers as a prosecutor.
	And they don't have the ability to tell the executive how to be an executive.
	And I don't think that they have the ability to command that money that has been allocated by the Congress be spent.
	You don't have to spend all that money.
	I mean, every year you look at these, you know, you look at schools and stuff, and we're at the end of the year.
	You know, so we got money left over.
	Spend it all.
	Because if you don't spend it, they're going to reduce our budget next year.
	They're going to say, hey, you didn't need all that money.
	We're not going to allocate it to you.
	So spend all the money that you still got left over.
	That kind of nonsense.
	These judges are supposed to be setting discrete settling, discrete and specific matters, not setting policy, he said.
	I think Vance is right.
	And so I hope that Trump will fight it this time.
	He didn't do it last time.
	It looks like Vance is up for it.
	It looks like Musk is up for it.
	And I think that would be a very good precedent.
	He'd be setting a precedent, and it'd be a good one for a change.
	He set a lot of really bad precedents.
	And so we look at these judicial orders.
	We've got judges ordering that the CDC, the FDA, and other agencies have to restore these DEI pages.
	Now, that's the kind of micromanagement, the kind of detail management that they don't have any authority to do, but it's being done by district court judges, setting policy for the entire country.
	A federal judge on Tuesday yesterday ordered U.S. health agencies, such as the CDC and the FDA, to restore data and web pages that were taken down in recent days.
	He ordered them to comply with a Trump administration order on gender ideology and diversity rules.
	So, they said, take down your DEI pages.
	And they took them down.
	But then they went to a judge, and the judge said, no, you've got to put them back up.
	Who are you?
	Who are you?
	This is not your purview.
	U.S. District Judge John Bate.
	A lot of these pages.
	HIV, HIV, HIV.
	The CDC page that had the title, Safer Food Choices for Pregnant People, was renamed Safer Food Choices for Pregnant Women.
	Judge doesn't like that either.
	When the previous version of the CDC page is accessed, it displays a message saying that it's moved to the one referencing women, because only women can get pregnant.
	This is a judge that has inserted himself into this.
	The CDC displays a message on all of its webpages now that reads, CDC's website is being modified to comply with President Trump's executive order.
	So now I guess maybe what they'll do is modify their website to say that CDC's website is now being modified to comply with the judicial orders of a U.S. district judge.
	Because that's now what is really happening.
	He's put himself, that's why I talk about judicial supremacy.
	And it must be destroyed.
	Hopefully, this clash will destroy it.
	We'll see.
	But again, these people, the CDC, the FDA, all these other people, these health organizations, they had no problem at all with Trump's executive order of March 13, 2020.
	They were fine with that.
	They don't like his executive order taking off all the tranny stuff.
	But it's going to come down to a fight with the courts.
	Appeals court rejects Trump's administration bid to immediately reinstate a funding freeze.
	Who are they?
	GOP Representative Crane has now drafted an impeachment article on the judge who blocked Doge from accessing the Treasury information and, as I said before, even blocked the Treasury Secretary.
	That's the arrogance of these judges, and so I'm glad to see it.
	Eli Crane.
	Called Judge Engelmayer's actions judicial overreach.
	And he does need to be impeached.
	I hope they do.
	Meanwhile, we've got Elizabeth Warren.
	Lion Liz.
	Who says, only Congress can shut agencies down.
	Not Trump or Musk.
	She's worried about her Frankenstein child, the Consumer Financial Protection Board, CFPB.
	And she says, she went on with Rachel Maddow.
	And she said, Warren said.
	Only Congress, not Donald Trump, not Elon Musk, not some 22-year-old programmer.
	Eat your heart out, Liz.
	He's a lot smarter than you are.
	Only Congress can shut this agency down.
	But here's the trick on that one.
	You notice none of the Republicans are, oh yeah, they know, you know, beat on their chests and their big manly guys.
	Yeah, it's about men versus women, isn't it, Liz?
	Yeah.
	And they keep putting...
	End these bills to say, let's shut down the consumer agency, but they don't actually want a real vote on that?
	Now, let's stop and talk about this agency that was created by Elizabeth Warren, and I think Barney Frank had something to do with it, but it's her child, her baby.
	She's upset about this.
	I played the clip for you yesterday, which I said, you know, they've uncovered...
	Fraudulent claims and stuff like that.
	Well, you know, we always had courts where people could sue things, but, you know, they're for the consumer.
	Well, no, they shut down over a period of about four or five years.
	It was about 150 banks a year were going under because of the new regulations, and they were the small and medium-sized banks.
	The big banks could handle it.
	You know, it's government regulations, as one person says, kind of like a spider's web.
	It catches the small gnats and flies, but the big bumblebees go straight through it.
	Well, that's the way it was with the big banks and her Consumer Financial Protection Board.
	The regulations were just blown right through with these other guys, but it trapped and killed all of the small and medium-sized companies.
	But let's talk about this idea that only Congress can shut this stuff down.
	When Elizabeth Warren created this thing with her legislation, They specifically put the Consumer Financial Protection Board out of the reach of Congress.
	They made them funded by the Federal Reserve instead of funded by Congress because that's how Congress exercises control.
	Congress could defund, Congress could kill any of these agencies by defunding them.
	Instead what they did was they gave the IRS Seven times with the Republicans in charge.
	Mike Johnson gave them seven times what their current budget is.
	Groove them by 700% or whatever.
	That's just inexcusable.
	But the Congress could go the other way, right?
	They could cut the budget of one of these things because they are the ones who control the purse strings.
	So that's how congressional control is exercised.
	Elizabeth Warren is saying, well, Congress needs to control this.
	Well, that's through the money that is allocated.
	But she short-circuited congressional control, and she did it deliberately because she knew how this was going to be used.
	And so what she did was she funded it from the Federal Reserve, not even from the Treasury Department.
	She funded it from the Federal Reserve to get it out of the control of Congress.
	She designed this thing.
	To short-circuit the control of Congress.
	And now she's whining that Trump and Musk are shutting it down.
	That's right, boys and girls.
	There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
	Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
	It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense.
	Go to davidknight.gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself.
	Tony Arterburn.
	He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
	He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
	Cool!
	Ha ha ha!
	Back in the day, when I wasn't Shadowban, A lot of people say, how can you be a Christian and libertarian?
	And I say, well, that's why I called it libertarian.
	Because I'm about liberty.
	I'm not about the libertarian party.
	I don't think these two are opposed to each other, being libertarian or Christian.
	As a matter of fact, I don't think you can.
	You have to have both of those.
	You can't have liberty away from Christ.
	Freedom is in Christ.
	Outside of Christ, you are enslaved.
	Do whatever it is that you serve, whether it is money or power or sex or drugs or whatever.
	You've got an enslavement to that.
	But it's also the fact that the founders of this country understood and said, we have a form of government that will only be able to be sustained if the people are moral.
	And so this article from Kevin Shroom, an American reformer, says, the ancient question...
	What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?
	In other words, if Jerusalem would represent in the old days a metaphor for a spiritual center and Athens would represent the political, you know, what do the two have to do with each other?
	So we used to need God, but now that science and modern medicine, this is the argument, right?
	We used to need God, but now that we got science and modern medicine and we got AI, we don't need God anymore.
	We've been set free from the need to believe in God.
	We believe in science and self and in the state.
	And what will take Christianity's place, he says?
	Well, it's not going to have its place taken by atheism.
	No, you're going to serve someone.
	You're going to worship something.
	The heart is an idol factory.
	If you look at Bob Dylan, during his short Christian phase, he said, you're going to serve someone.
	You're going to serve something.
	We're always out there looking for something to idolize, aren't we?
	So he said, it's going to be a new paganism.
	As many people have pointed out, the return of the so-called strong gods of antiquity.
	Mysticism, the dark arts, and scientism is a part of that.
	Science as a religion, not as a thought process, not as a way of proving the physical reality of something, or of disproving something that somebody has said.
	That's equally important.
	No, no, no.
	We're not going to look at data.
	You can't see the data.
	You can't see the data from Fauci.
	You can't see the data from Pfizer.
	You can't see the data from Michael Mann.
	You can't see the data, period.
	You just do what they have to say.
	It's an argument from authority.
	These are the people who are our high priests.
	And whatever they say, we must follow.
	The ability to refashion human nature, in other words, to make a biological boy into a girl, to even turn men into gods, or basically to create life without having two parents, being able to genetically modify a baby, hatch them, and so forth.
	This is playing God.
	And when you look at this, The whole aspect of, well, we're going to join with machines, and we're going to become cyborgs, as the Baphomet billionaire Elon Musk wants us to believe.
	And we're going to become powerful, we're going to merge with AI and the robots, and we're going to live forever?
	That's what he's selling.
	That is the transhumanism.
	But of course, transgenderism is an important part of that.
	If you can become a different sex, Which you can't.
	And what they do is they mutilate people.
	They butcher people.
	It's a Frankenstein approach.
	And all of this stuff about brain-computer interfaces and the singular and all the rest of the stuff, this is heinous Frankenstein type of science.
	The kind of freedom that is often pursued these days is dangerous and elusive.
	It's dangerous because once it is obtained, it's often misused and abused.
	Freedom turns to vice if it is not disciplined.
	That's why the founders talked about happiness.
	When they talked about happiness, it wasn't just a, oh, great, I feel good today.
	No, no, no.
	They were talking about happiness in the philosophical and the rhetorical world in which they lived.
	Happiness was about achieving a state of virtue.
	It wasn't just about Satisfying whatever your animal instincts were.
	No, it was about pursuing virtue.
	True freedom begins by being set free from sin.
	Set free for a relationship with God and Christ, reminding us that He is God, not us.
	The original bondage is the bondage to sin.
	Made in God's image, we have stiff-armed God.
	We have sinned against the one who made us.
	Sin brought spiritual death, alienation, bondage, spiritual confusion.
	A disconnection from reality.
	If you disconnect from God, you have disconnected from the ultimate reality.
	In his infinite mercy, God chose not to leave us in bondage, but sent his son, the God-man, Jesus Christ, on a rescue mission.
	He died a substitutionary death, was buried, raised from the dead.
	Knowing these truths, and knowing the person of truth, sets us free from sin, from death, from future judgment.
	True freedom comes from truth, forgiveness, and spiritual liberation.
	You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
	Freedom in Christ sets us free from the main bondage we experience, and that is the bondage of thinking that we are God.
	That's exactly the opposite of what they paid big bucks to have Harrison Ford tell you.
	Life doesn't come with a manual.
	Figure that all out yourself.
	Well, no, actually, it does come with a manual.
	And if you know Christ, you also get a helper.
	Rather than the false freedom of play, God, we're set to free our true selves in Christ.
	So, he talks about this in terms of the founding of America.
	And he talks about it in terms of horizontal freedom.
	He says, true freedom doesn't terminate in personal, individual freedom.
	Personal freedom is not a spiritual cul-de-sac.
	When a person is set free in Jesus Christ, they long to be free in other ways as well.
	Politically, economically, educationally, socially.
	One freedom follows another.
	And this is why anti-Christian and anti-God cultures hate the gospel.
	Cultures like North Korea, China, India, you name it, right?
	They seek...
	Why?
	Because politicians always want to see, of all people, politicians want to see themselves as God.
	They don't want to have any competition.
	But they also don't want people becoming free.
	They want you to be controlled by them.
	For example, America can claim a Christian founding because the earliest settlers desired the freedom to worship God according to the dictates of their own conscience, without unwarranted government intervention.
	Yet this led to more than just worship.
	It led to settlement.
	It led to societal development.
	It led to the Protestant work ethic because of the belief that God has honored by the use of our freedoms an effort to build something, to create something, to fulfill the dominion mandate of Genesis.
	America was and is a unique experience in human liberty.
	Because the freedom that produces and builds rather than tyranny, authoritarianism, and all-encompassing government.
	That was the mindset of the people there.
	You know, when people argue, was America a Christian nation or whatever?
	It was, this is not to say that the politicians were Christians.
	Some were, some weren't.
	It's not to say that the people who wrote down these basic philosophies were Christians.
	Some were, some weren't.
	But Christianity pervaded.
	American society at the time, just as this kind of spectator paganism, hedonism permeates our society today.
	It's a very different society.
	America is not anything like the America that was gifted freedom by God, because that's the other part of it.
	It's not a spiritual cul-de-sac, but it is also not something that we do ourselves.
	Our spiritual freedom, as well as these other horizontal freedoms, are gifts from God.
	That was something that was acknowledged by our founders.
	So America was and is a unique experiment in human history because of that freedom that produces and builds.
	America was not a Christian nation in that it was a theocracy, like Israel was a theocracy.
	However, it was and is.
	Let's hope that I don't think that it is anymore.
	A Christian nation, and that its DNA was Christian from the outset.
	Its founding principles were Christian.
	In brief, objective, vertical freedom in Christ led many to seek freedom on horizontal levels.
	Political, economic, social, educational.
	This is why the Declaration of Independence says, we hold these truths to be self-evident.
	That all men are created equal.
	By the way, it holds that the Creator is also self-evident, doesn't it?
	And that is true.
	We understand that the things that we see were created by things that we do not see.
	We understand there had to be an intelligence behind the creation of things as complex as us, even as complex as our DNA.
	It has to be a creator.
	It is self-evident, isn't it?
	And that we're endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, and among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
	The self-evident God and the self-evident God-given truths form the basis of the pursuit of a free society that is productive.
	That is why you can't separate these things.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	And David is giving a 10% discount to listeners from now until 2025.
	At that price, you should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
	The End Well, we have Mike Johnson.
	Let's take a look at how Biden is doing here.
	We've got Mike Johnson doing a retrospective on Biden.
	He says, I'm not betraying the confidence here.
	This has now been reported.
	And he goes, yeah, just verify that he didn't remember his own executive order on natural gas just weeks after he had signed it.
	But that's not the most important thing that comes out of what Mike Johnson says.
	As he's talking about this, notice, and I want to play you the clip, but notice that Mike Johnson is saying, you know, he's trying to get a meeting with Biden and his people are protecting him.
	And that's what the New York Times and all these people are saying.
	How did they manage to pull this off?
	They were shielding Biden from everybody.
	And so he says, it was very difficult for me.
	He says, here I am, Speaker of the House, and I'm third in, you know, in line or second in line or whatever to the president.
	You know, it's just the president, the vice president, and then it's Mike Johnson.
	That should keep you up at night.
	But that's sellout.
	But anyway, but he said it was very hard for him to get a meeting.
	Finally he gets a meeting, and we have this person, this person, and the CIA is there.
	You know, he just mentions that casually.
	Why is the CIA there?
	Because they are the government.
	They're the ones who are running.
	Who's running the Biden White House?
	The CIA, the same ones that run the Trump White House and all the other White Houses that are there.
	Stan Biden, and I say this without any personal animus at all.
	I mean, you know, in some ways I actually kind of feel sorry for Joe Biden.
	I mean, he's in the twilight years of his life.
	He has not, obviously, has not been in charge for some time.
	And I know this by personal observation, and now the whole world knows it, and it's been very...
	Very concerning to me over the last, you know, year and a half since I've had this position.
	Can you tell us a story when you say personal observation?
	What kind of thing did you see?
	Well, I mean, it's public now because the Wall Street Journal got it and put it on the front page.
	But January a year ago, almost exactly a year ago.
	I became Speaker in October 2023, and there were all sorts of big national security concerns and everything going on, and I started requesting a meeting with the President, because, you know, I'm kind of old school.
	I'm a constitutional law guy.
	The Speaker of the House should be able to talk to the President, especially in times of great national interest and calamity.
	But they wouldn't let me meet with him, and his staff kept getting excuses.
	This went on for like eight or nine weeks.
	I'm sorry, Mr. Speaker, he doesn't have time.
	What are you talking about?
	I'm second in line of the presidency.
	He has time.
	I need to talk to him.
	We had...
	I can't say the classified parts, but we had some big, big national concerns at the time that I was losing sleep over.
	Finally, I just went to the Hill Press Corps and I said, the president is not being allowed to meet with the speaker.
	There's a problem.
	So they started putting pressure on him.
	Long story short, they finally relented.
	They invited me to the White House.
	I show up and I realize it's actually an ambush because it's not just me and the president.
	It's also...
	Kamala Harris, Chuck Schumer, Hakeem, you know, the whole, the CIA director, everybody.
	And then, so I walked in the Oval, and oh, I know what this is.
	This is a, they're going to hotbox the speaker on Ukraine funding.
	That's what it was.
	This is probably the third week of January.
	We sit down.
	Before he caved on Ukraine.
	And the whole conversation, and I'm going, we don't need to have this conversation.
	The president reaches over just like this.
	We're sitting right next to the fireplace in the Oval, and he grabs my arm, and he says, The Speaker and I just need a couple minutes together.
	Would you all just leave us alone?
	And I looked up on the faces of some of the staff standing around the wall, and they're like, no, he did it.
	So he called it.
	He's the Commander-in-Chief.
	So everybody leaves, and he and I are standing awkwardly in the middle of the Oval Office right over the rug by that coffee table.
	And I said, Mr. President, thanks for the moments.
	This is very important.
	I've got some big national security things I need to talk to you about that I've heard, and I think you know, and what do we do?
	But first, real quickly, Mr. President, can I ask you a question?
	I cannot answer this from my constituents in Louisiana.
	Sir, why did you pause LNG exports to Europe?
	Like, I don't understand, you know, liquefied natural gas is in great demand by our allies.
	Why would you do that?
	Because you understand, we just talked about Ukraine.
	You understand you're fueling Vladimir Putin's war machine because they've got to get their gas.
	You realize the purpose of this war is for our LNG pipelines.
	And he said, I didn't do that.
	And I said, Mr. President, Yes, you did.
	It was an executive order, like, you know, three weeks ago.
	And he goes, "No, I didn't do that." And he's arguing with me.
	I said, "Mr.
	President, respectfully, could I go out here and ask your secretary to print it out?
	We'll read it together.
	You definitely did that." And he goes, "Oh, you talk about natural gas." "Yes, sir." He said, "No, no, you misunderstand." He said, "What I did is I signed this thing to...
	We're going to conduct a study on the effects of LNG." I said, no, you're not, sir.
	You paused it.
	I know.
	I have the terminal, the export terminals in my state.
	I talked to those people this morning.
	This is doing massive damage to our economy, national security.
	It occurred to me, Barry, he was not lying to me.
	He genuinely did not know what he had signed.
	And I walked out of that meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, we're in serious trouble.
	Who is running the country?
	Like, I don't know who put the paper in front of him, but he didn't.
	Yeah, right.
	Who's running the country?
	Who put the paper in front of him?
	I mean, CIA guy was there along with all the Democrat operatives, right?
	Yeah.
	And, you know, the whole purpose of this, which didn't make any sense to Johnson, because, you know, he's being told, you know, we're running this war so that we can make sure we're supplying Europe with liquid natural gas and other things instead of the Russians, right?
	Same story that we see in Syria.
	It's got to be our, we're going to sell to them, not Russia or other people.
	And so the CIA got what it wanted out of him, didn't it?
	You know, remember he was like, no, no more money for Ukraine when he first gets in.
	And then, all right, all right.
	Money for Ukraine, but only if you do something about the border.
	And then he turned.
	And it's like, okay, forget the border.
	We'll just send money to Ukraine.
	That type of thing.
	And forget the people in Western North Carolina.
	You know, that's one of the things, is we look at this inauguration that is happening.
	Oh, we've got to move it inside.
	And so the MAGA media is like, well, is it because Trump's in danger?
	Or is it because of the weather?
	It's like, well, I don't know if Trump's in danger, but I do know who is in danger.
	I know it's really cold here.
	We're right here where these people in Western North Carolina got wiped out.
	By Hurricane Helene.
	And they get no help at all from the federal government.
	As a matter of fact, the federal government and the local government is kicking them in the teeth.
	And there's a situation right now where we've got temperatures in the teens every night this week.
	These people don't have a safe place to live.
	And nobody is talking about it.
	It's not on Trump's radar.
	Nobody cares.
	Trump will move his inauguration indoors.
	Is he going to do anything to help the people in North Carolina?
	No.
	He said that he's going to go to California and look at the aftermath of the fires.
	Fine.
	What about North Carolina?
	What about the people that actually voted for you?
	Nothing.
	But let's talk about the CIA because, as I said before, I think the CIA is a real government.
	I think the CIA is an enemy of the American people.
	And there was a very interesting back and forth between John Kiriakou and another, well, former, maybe former, who knows, with his CIA people.
	A guy by the name of Bustamante.
	And I want you to hear what this Bustamante guy is saying in terms of...
	John Kiriakou says, well, you know, the government is supposed to answer to us.
	It's supposed to serve us.
	No, it's not.
	You're here to serve the government.
	And this guy, this CIA guy, this Bustamante guy, he makes the case that Americans are not important.
	What is important...
	Is continuity of government.
	You believe that the government is there to support you?
	Is that what you said?
	No, I believe the government should be responsive to me.
	It works for me.
	It shouldn't be able to target me.
	That's where we're fundamentally opposed.
	Oh, I'm sure.
	Because the government does not work for us.
	I'm saying it should.
	It should not.
	The government is there to ensure the continuation of the American ideal.
	That's the purpose of the government.
	It is not there to serve you.
	That doesn't even mean anything to the American ideal.
	What is that?
	What is the American ideal?
	If every American is killed, with the exception of the people in government, one congressperson, one senator, and the president or the vice president, the plan to let us all die and save themselves, America is defined not by its people, by its government.
	That's what we went to war with the British about.
	We could have been colonists.
	That guy's with the CIA.
	Hear that?
	We could have been collections.
	The right to sovereign independence is a government thing.
	The government exists to survive and serve the continuation of the government of the United States, not the American people.
	That's part of the ideological hogwash that we were all taught in elementary school civics that just isn't true.
	And then they taught you the real truth at the CIA.
	You swore an oath to protect and serve the Constitution of the United States.
	That is a document defining the government.
	A government of the people, by the people, for the people.
	The people of the United States, through the eyes of the government, FBI, CIA, NSA, the White House, the people of the United States are engines of economic...
	We are there to create the GDP and the flow of power that the government can then use to enact national security policies or international policies that benefit the government.
	That's the cycle.
	What was it that Jefferson said that periodically the tree of liberty has to be watered with the blood of martyrs and patriots?
	Mmm.
	Yeah.
	I'm ready to fight.
	Yeah.
	Fight for what?
	My independence.
	Not fight for your government?
	No.
	Where do you think you get your independence from?
	It's not the government that gives you my independence.
	1,000% is the government that gives you your independence.
	It's the government that infringes on my independence.
	That's right.
	That's what he just defined.
	Oh, my God, yes.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah.
	This Bustamante guy, you know, he lays out how, you know, we can start a nuclear war, and you can all die, and it doesn't matter if Americans exist or not.
	We've got to have the government exist.
	And you're there to make sure the government continues.
	And you're there to work.
	And to provide stuff for the government.
	And then he says, and so, you know, independence from what?
	Oh, independence from the government, says John Kiriakou.
	And he goes, you know, folks, that's the mindset of these people.
	And again, you can go back and you can look at the book, Raven Rock, the subtitle of it was The Plan to Let All of Us Die and to Save Themselves.
	That's what he's talking about there.
	That was the situation at the beginning of the Cold War.
	That was the situation when they created this abstraction called national security that overrides everything, that makes slaves out of us.
	The god of national security.
	Everything will be sacrificed on the altar of national security.
	And you're nothing to these people.
	They will protect themselves and their underground bunkers while we get...
	Nuclear weapons rain down on us as a consequence of their actions and their provocations.
	That's what this is really about.
	And it's just interesting and refreshing, I guess, in a sense, to hear somebody finally say the quiet part out loud that we know.
	But you'll see books like Raven Rock, and it's presented in that book as, well, yeah, this is the Cold War mindset.
	Isn't it nice that the CIA isn't like that anymore?
	Or you'll have...
	Books about DARPA.
	And it's like, yeah, this planet was really dark, but you know, that was 60 years ago.
	Oh, it's not like that now.
	No, it's much, much worse.
	You're just cattle to them.
	You're here to serve them.
	That's what the CIA says.
	You're there to work for them.
	You don't matter.
	Only their government matters.
	Well, you know, John Kiriakou, I've interviewed him many times, and he was the only one that went to jail for the lies and the deaths of the Iraq War.
	We were lied into the Iraq War.
	Trump said we were lied into the Iraq War.
	He was right about that.
	And then what did he do when he became president?
	He turned around and he promoted the person who did the torture, who sold the lies.
	He made Gina Haspel the head of the CIA.
	And John Kiriaki, who exposed the lies, went to jail.
	And Trump would not pardon him.
	Mm-hmm.
	Yeah.
	Instead, Rudy Giuliani wants a million dollars to talk to Trump about a pardon.
	That's what the Trump government is.
	That's what our government is.
	That's what the CIA is.
	The CIA is our government.
	The End Making sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	Bill Gates.
	He is making the rounds on this stuff.
	And when I first saw this, I thought, why is he on so many shows?
	I played for you a couple of clips yesterday.
	He went on NBC, the Today Show, and then he goes on to The View, and in both of these cases, the clips that I played, he was talking about Elon Musk and his love for USAID.
	And we talked about how intricately USAID was involved in depopulation.
	Today, earlier, we talked about how USAID has been funding all kinds of Sodom and Gomorrah stuff all over the world.
	And, of course, those things go hand in hand.
	But he was also talking about pandemics and vaccines and all the usual stuff.
	He went on also now with Jimmy Fallon and finally realized why he's doing this media blitz.
	He's promoting his autobiography that he just released.
	And it's called Source Code, My Beginnings.
	It should have been Lawsuit, My Beginning.
	Or intellectual property theft in my beginning.
	He won the lawsuit that was brought against him.
	He got his beginning, as I've said before.
	You look at MS-DOS, and it was a direct theft of intellectual property from a company called Digital Research.
	Source code, my beginning.
	Seems like that would be a better title for Zuckerberg's autobiography, since he's like a robot.
	Source code, my beginning.
	Bill Gates is not about writing code.
	He's about stealing stuff.
	Bill Gates goes on to Jimmy Fallon's show, and he says humans aren't going to be needed for most things.
	Everyone's talking about AI, and that's the big topic.
	Everyone's talking about how it's going to take over and all this stuff, and it's bad, or it's good, or we don't know.
	What are the pros and cons in layman's terms for someone like me?
	Yeah, so the era we've come to is...
	Sort of the vision that computing was expensive and it basically became free.
	The era that we're just starting is that intelligence is rare.
	You know, a great doctor, a great teacher.
	And with AI, over the next decade, that will become free, commonplace.
	You know, great medical advice, great tutoring.
	It's kind of profound because it solves all these specific problems.
	Like, we don't have enough doctors or, you know, mental health professionals.
	But it brings with it kind of so much change.
	You know, what will jobs be like?
	Should we, you know, just work like two or three days a week?
	So I love the innovation board.
	Maybe you should take off.
	But I think, you know, it's a little bit unknown.
	Will we be able to shape it?
	And so legitimately, People are like, wow, this is a bit scary.
	It's completely new territory.
	I mean, will we still need humans?
	Not for most things.
	You know, we'll decide.
	I mean, hosting a talk show, definitely.
	Really?
	Well, we'll decide, you know, like baseball.
	We won't want to watch...
	Do we need Jimmy Fallon for him?
	Yeah.
	And, you know, so there'll be some things...
	That we reserve for ourselves.
	But in terms of making things and moving things and growing food, over time, those will be basically solved problems.
	Yeah.
	Maybe he should rename his biography My Pact with Lucifer.
	Is AI going to be funnier than Jimmy Fallon?
	Yes.
	And all of his writers combined.
	So Gates is saying, well, you know, intelligence is rare, but we're going to make it very common.
	I wonder when I hear all these billionaires talking about how they're going to replace us and get rid of us and pacify us.
	Whistler says, a monkey on a typewriter is funnier than Jimmy Fallon and his writers.
	At least he gets a joke every once in a while.
	Will AI replace billionaires?
	No, evidently not.
	Evidently, billionaires are the un- We're a replaceable profession.
	Smart ones of us, as Bloomberg said, who are going to be controlling everybody else.
	People could end up working only two or three days a week.
	That's why we've got to have universal basic income.
	You see, when I talk about how Gates goes on these shows and positions himself as the anti-Musk and everything, these guys are both on the same side.
	They're on the same side as Bloomberg and all these billionaires.
	They want to make sure that we own nothing.
	That they pacify us so, as Bloomberg said, we don't grab guillotines and come after them.
	But he says in terms of making things and moving things and growing food.
	Did you catch that?
	Growing food.
	Over time, those will basically be solved problems.
	Putting potentially billions of people out of work who will then be completely dependent on the state is a solved problem.
	And that's what we're talking about.
	And Elon Musk is of the same ilk.
	And Elon Musk is actually...
	More threatening than Bill Gates is on AI.
	He says, you're going to have to join it or die.
	That if you don't merge with a machine, the singularity, and it's Gates, it's Peter Thiel, who are pushing this singularity.
	It's Peter Thiel who funded the Singularity Society and the meetings that they have on an annual basis.
	That Ray Kurzweil is the front guy that does all the talking.
	But the money is coming from Peter Thiel.
	General Motors, Cruz.
	And they're shutting down, and they're laying off the humans who are smarter than everybody else, and we're going to take our jobs.
	Well, not yet, suckers.
	John Henry is a steel-driving man, and he's still driving.
	He's driving those cars, not just the spikes.
	General Motors RoboTaxi Company Cruise laid off half of its workforce two months after GM pulled its funding.
	In October 2023, a pedestrian became trapped underneath a cruise robo-taxi.
	Remember that?
	Leading to California yanking its permit in the state.
	Despite lofty plans to bring its robo-taxi service to more cities, crews never recovered.
	They pulled their entire fleet from the streets in November, and they never made a return.
	Will they ever return?
	Let's hope they never return.
	The MTA and crews as well.
	Plenty of mayhem on public streets.
	And the terrifying run-ins with pedestrians, despite many years of testing and billions in investment.
	Remember that?
	We were always told.
	You know, this is one of the lines from Elon Musk about how they were going to be so much safer.
	And yet, Tesla's got the highest accident rate of any brand that is out there.
	And not everybody has self-driving option that's on the Tesla.
	It costs a lot more money.
	And even those people, many of them have learned better and don't use it.
	But we were told that because of the collective hive mind, you know, as they're going out there, driving through the streets, that they were going to get smarter and smarter, very rapidly.
	Because they were going to be sharing their experience.
	So when one robo-taxi would encounter something, it would learn from that, and then it would share that learned experience with all the other robo-taxis.
	Of course, that didn't happen.
	And we're starting to hear stuff like that about artificial intelligence.
	And when I look at artificial intelligence, I'm not worried about it becoming a godlike intelligence, which was the second part of Hugo de Garis' book.
	But I'm worried about how it will be used by the elites against us in a very satanic way.
	What it is good at doing is collecting a vast amount of information and summarizing it.
	Now, of course, it doesn't always get that right.
	And so the way these people want to use it is they want to collect a vast amount of information about each and every one of us.
	And then they want to summarize us to the people who would be our masters to enslave us.
	And what if they don't get that right?
	That's the real issue as well.
	What if they do get it right?
	If they do get it right, I guess you won't be seeing me anymore.
	But a lot of innocent people who harbor no ill will to the government, as I do, would be caught up in that as well.
	And I'm a declared enemy of the state.
	You don't need an AI robot to figure that out.
	They've already figured it out.
	That's why I'm banned on so many different places.
	��
	you You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	Instead, what they'll do is give us a new spin on it.
	And that is what Trump is pushing through.
	Together these world-leading technology giants are announcing the formation of Stargate.
	So put that name down in your books, because I think you're going to hear a lot about it.
	In the future, a new American company that will invest $500 billion, at least, in AI infrastructure in the United States and very quickly moving very rapidly, creating over 100,000 American jobs almost immediately.
	Are they going to create jobs or jabs?
	That's what I need to know, right?
	And why is he involved in this if it's a private company?
	That's what I would like to know as well.
	You know, they had announced this, that they were going to do it several months ago.
	They were talking about $100 billion, and they're talking about $500 billion.
	And so I thought, well, is he kicking in money on this stuff?
	They insist that it is going to be privately funded.
	Handy sent this to me when he says, a personalized mRNA vaccine for every individual.
	He's still the godfather of the vaccines, isn't he?
	As a matter of fact, this is the way that...
	So he has this dog and pony show.
	And he brings in Larry Ellison, and he brings in Sam Altman, all the usual suspects, plus a Japanese banker with SoftBank and some other people.
	And he holds a press conference with all this stuff.
	By the way, people, Trump, just a reminder, people in western North Carolina are still freezing in this cold.
	I tell you, it's cold here.
	It was colder here than in New York City, which is really strange.
	And it's getting down into the single digits here at night.
	And we're not too far away from where these people lost their homes and still Republicans not interested in even talking about it.
	Not even on the radar for them at all.
	No, let's talk about a half a trillion dollars that we're going to spend on AI and mRNA technology.
	This is Larry Ellison of Oracle talking about how The silicon grifters are going to take over healthcare next.
	Oh, that's really funny.
	One of the most exciting things we're working on, again, using the tools that Sam and Masa are providing, is a cancer vaccine.
	It's very interesting.
	This guy's not a doctor either.
	He's another Bill Gates.
	Cancer tumors, little fragments of those tumors float around in your blood.
	So you can do early cancer detection.
	You can do early cancer detection with a blood test.
	And using AI to look at the blood test.
	You can find the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the person.
	So we can, again, cancer diagnosis using AI has the promise of just being a simple blood test.
	Then beyond that, once we gene sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer.
	And you can make that vaccine, that mRNA vaccine, you can make that robotically again using AI in about 48 hours.
	So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for your particular cancer aimed at you, and have that vaccine available in 48 hours.
	This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future.
	Be careful about that.
	He just basically described grain, genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, probably nanotech as well, all that stuff.
	Kind of reminds me of what somebody once said about nuclear reactors.
	There's one hell of a way to boil water, isn't it?
	We could have used coal.
	Oh, no, no, we can't use coal.
	You've got to use my complicated, expensive stuff, right?
	With all kinds of adverse issues as well.
	This is an unbelievably...
	Complex and expensive way.
	Let's see how we can take these new technologies and roll them together into something that is going to be astronomically expensive and bankrupt everybody so that they can own everything.
	I won't be participating in that.
	By the way, you know, when we want to talk about cancer, there's this really old-school way where you can just eat apricot seeds.
	Have you ever heard of that?
	Vitamin B17?
	That's why I had G. Edward Griffin on to talk about that.
	He was not afraid to talk about it.
	Doctors were afraid.
	Doctors had come to him and say, you know, we saw some things here and we thought, well, maybe that should work.
	And I tried it on my dog that had cancer and got better.
	My nurse knew about it and her husband had just been diagnosed with cancer.
	She begged me to listen to it.
	So we quietly did it, and it worked.
	And I said, don't tell anybody.
	But then it gets out.
	Everybody knows about it.
	And he goes, and people are coming to me with friends and family, or themselves, who have cancer.
	And he says they're getting healed.
	But he says, I know that they're going to shut me down if I do it.
	So, Ed, can you do it?
	Sure, I'll do it.
	Writes A World Without Cancer.
	And you can find the book, by the way.
	At rncstores.com.
	You can use the code NIGHT to save 10% off.
	You can get the apricot seeds there.
	They're bitter, but, I mean, it's the natural remedy.
	If you don't like that, you can get it in a pill form as well.
	You know, I would certainly try that before I would trust Larry Ellison, Sam Altman, and Donald Trump.
	Three of the most...
	The untrustworthy grifters you could ever know beyond the fact that they're going to make a custom DNA vaccine for you, the mRNA stuff.
	I called it from the very beginning a genetic code injection.
	Remember that?
	I called it the GCI.
	From the very beginning, they're saying, well, we're going to program your body.
	To do this or to do that?
	And I said, well, what could possibly go wrong with that?
	And if they're going to program your body, they say, oh, well, no, mRNA doesn't modify DNA.
	And I said, well, if it copies it, if that's all it does is copy it, if it doesn't do it right, it's going to modify it, right?
	Just by common sense.
	But then we had some research in 2020 when all this stuff was happening very quietly.
	It was only reported in a couple of places, and nobody else wanted to talk about it.
	Certainly not at Infowars.
	Thomas Jefferson University did an experiment.
	They said, look, you can modify DNA with mRNA.
	And everybody goes, shh, don't talk about that.
	Don't talk about that.
	Yeah, what are they trying to do to modify our DNA?
	But the other part of it is, even as Moderna, which was always about mRNA, that's what they were formed for.
	They pronounced their name at the beginning.
	They called it Mode RNA.
	Then they said, no, let's call it Moderna.
	But it's always been about mRNA.
	And so that has been their focus from the very beginning.
	It was always extremely dangerous.
	Other pharmaceutical companies tried it and dropped out.
	They never had anything that worked, and they still don't.
	It's just that Trump and Fauci shilled for them.
	And told people that it worked.
	Every other product that they had done for 10 years was a pump and dump.
	They would tell rumors on Wall Street and get everybody to buy their stock.
	Hey, we got a cure for this.
	We got a cure for that.
	And it's just, you know, it's miraculous.
	But on their own side, they're saying, well, we can.
	And they said it, you know, when Trump set up that presentation.
	And remember how he set that up.
	He has all these pharmaceutical executives at the table.
	How long is it going to take you?
	Well, that's too long.
	How about you?
	Well, it's a little bit faster.
	That's not fast enough.
	So forth.
	And he's got it set up.
	So the last one he goes to is Moderna.
	And they said, we got it right now because we don't have to manufacture the vaccine.
	Your body will manufacture the vaccine.
	And that's the way they described it.
	And so you're going to hijack my genetics, right?
	With an injection.
	And when does it all stop?
	And people are asking this.
	When does it stop?
	Whatever it's doing to your body, when does that stop?
	So, in addition to the mRNA stuff, in addition to the artificial intelligence, Which, again, they're going to clear the decks for everything because artificial intelligence is their ultimate control tool.
	It's what allows them to go back and data mine all of our history, which they've been saving in their computer centers in Bluffdale, Utah.
	They built this massive center there to store everything that's happening on the web.
	Everything that you say or do on the web, they've stored it there.
	You'll probably get some of my things that were deleted by YouTube from them maybe someday, huh?
	I'm sure they will be presented at my trial.
	But they've got all this stuff there.
	Just waiting for the day where they can go back and data mine it.
	And that's coming really soon with artificial intelligence.
	In the early 1800s, philosopher Henri Saint-Simon, the ideological father of technocracy, wrote, and this is his preface to the article, Patrick Wood's preface.
	He said, A scientist, my dear friends, is a man who foresees.
	It is because science provides the means to predict that it is useful.
	And the scientists are superior to all other men.
	See, it's a religion.
	And they're prophets.
	They're false prophets.
	They've had their false prophecies about the climate and all these other things that are going to happen.
	But, you know, they're better than us.
	They're smarter than us.
	High priests.
	So they're both prophets and priests of a new religion.
	Scientism.
	And technocracy.
	And I tell you, Elon Musk is just thoroughly immersed in this.
	With his family, culturally, and all the rest of this.
	Been that way for a long time.
	The CDC's Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analysis has partnered with a CIA-linked Palantir to cement public-private model of invasion, surveillance, and public health, all while pushing the U.S. national security state and Silicon Valley even closer together.
	Again, anticipatory intelligence.
	And when we stop and think about the allopathic model of health care, we're going to identify something that's bad, and we're going to kill it, right?
	That's what they do.
	They don't try to work with your body, make you stronger and healthier.
	No, we're going to identify some pathogen.
	We're going to kill it.
	Pew, pew, pew.
	And the problem is, is that frequently your body is collateral damage.
	Isn't it?
	We've got something here that's going to kill bacteria.
	Except it also kills parts of your body as well.
	Oh, okay.
	Well, just collateral damage.
	But we've got the bacteria.
	That's the important thing.
	And so it's only natural that these things would converge, right?
	Palantir has been allied with the military and the defense to identify the enemies using artificial intelligence and predictive programming and all the rest is anticipatory intelligence.
	So we're going to predict who our enemies are, we're going to isolate and identify them, and then we're going to attack them.
	And big tech, Silicon Valley, is moving in a big way towards the defense industry.
	Elon Musk is all about that.
	Andrew Ill is all about that.
	All these Palantir and PayPal mafia companies are all about getting into weapons and other things like that.
	And so what they're going to do is they're going to weaponize medicine against us.
	Against us.
	Not against the disease.
	Against us.
	And they're going to use predictive programming.
	That's the way they're going to sell this.
	We can identify the disease now just like we would identify an enemy combatant in another country.
	And who knows, maybe they weren't enemies before we started shooting at them, but we can make them an enemy.
	Just like we can make you a lifetime patient, we can keep these wars going on forever.
	We go in and we kill a bunch of innocent people and may mutilate and kill a bunch of children, and we've got a war that's going to last for a long time.
	These people want to get even with that.
	So we'll do the same thing with our bodies.
	Make us permanent patience, just like we have permanent wars.
	Music
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲