Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 29, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:06

Mon Episode #1998: Land Mines; Big Bang Blows Up; Public School Satanic Seminaries

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday the 28th of April, year of our Lord 2025.
	Well, we see that we have governments within NATO now moving very quickly to get out of the...
	Treaties that were going to try to reduce civilian casualties, the holdovers of mines that destroy so many, kill so many civilians.
	Most of the people killed by the mines are civilians.
	But it's just another indication of where our governments are.
	As we see that another piece of legislation is coming out, and this has been defeated several times in lawsuits, but don't get within 15 feet of a law enforcement officer.
	You know, of course, during an emergency.
	Oh, what qualifies as an emergency?
	Well, whatever they want.
	And we see a breakthrough in the positive side.
	Supposedly, a Swiss company has come up with something to get rid of the radiation in Chernobyl.
	Pretty amazing.
	And we're going to take a look at a lot of technology today.
	A lot of it very strange.
	Some of it very funny.
	When we look at how people are using...
	Chat AI and how it has severely backfired on them.
	Yeah, you trust that?
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Well, there are claims that they've been able to cut the radiation by 47%.
	In a test area in Chernobyl.
	This is coming from a Swiss company.
	They have something they call the Nucleus Separation Passive System.
	Claims to have achieved a 47% reduction in airborne radiation, 37% reduction in soil radioactivity within a one hectare test area over a 12-month period.
	They said it operates through a network of approximately 5,000 polyethylene tubes installed underground at varying depths.
	These tubes, and that's just in one hectare, right?
	These tubes are designed to harness natural forces, such as gravity, to accelerate the decay of radioactive particles without use of chemicals or soil excavation.
	The technology utilizes high-velocity particles known as positrons that target and break down radioactive isotopes like cesium-137, strontium-90, and americam-241.
	Well, that's great.
	I have no idea how that would or could work, except that the company, Acceltera, projects a test site could reach a natural background radiation level within five years.
	The 24,000 years that would be required for natural decay without any intervention.
	So that is pretty amazing and very good and hopeful news, actually.
	And also hopeful news for all the people who have been gaslit with climate fear, afraid to have children, afraid to have their lives.
	We're all going to die, all the rest of this stuff.
	Well, the good news is that there was a warming period in the medieval times.
	Very inconvenient for these people, but also very real.
	It's a flashback to 2023, the so-called medieval warm period, subject of a lot of scientific debate for years.
	The question of whether or not this warm period is not a question of whether it took place, but how it took place.
	I don't understand, because you know in the Middle Ages, where they want us to go back to, right?
	They want us to live like that.
	Except they had global warming then.
	I guess it was all that dung fuel that they were burning.
	Around 950, there was a rise in temperature in Germany lasting about 300 years, which resulted in a marked warm phase that was actually favorable to agriculture and life.
	You know, warmer weather, CO2, sunlight, all these things they're trying to get rid of.
	Agriculture actually likes that.
	However, from the beginning of the 14th century, at the latest, this period was replaced by a relatively rapid drop in temperature and climatic turbulence in the direction of the so-called Little Ice Age.
	And so, it all depends on where you want to cherry-pick your starting point, right?
	Doesn't it?
	If you want to show a trend?
	Just like the weather, the climate goes through cycles.
	And yet, you see this on the left, and they're very concerned about climate apathy.
	They said, you know, people just don't care about the climate crisis.
	Maybe we don't believe you about the climate crisis.
	They say, climate apathy is outpacing the climate crisis.
	This is coming from The Guardian, of course.
	People are adjusting to worsening environmental conditions like multiple fire seasons per year disturbingly fast.
	When we used the same temperature data for a location, but we presented it...
	In a starker way, it broke through people's climate apathy.
	So, as I said, we just assumed that if the climate is getting bad, people would react.
	But instead, what we're seeing is the boiling frogs effect.
	In other words, people aren't seeing it.
	Maybe they're not seeing it because it's not happening.
	Maybe they're not seeing it because it's not significant.
	Prove it.
	And so what if it's true?
	So, this person says it'd be hilarious if it wasn't so shocking.
	Instead of accepting that it isn't a problem, they decide that they're going to make it more frightening.
	That's exactly the way it operates.
	The reality is, when we talk about the different options, this story from Zero Hedge points out, affordable, reliable, clean?
	Well, that would be natural gas.
	Much better than wind and solar.
	They are the worst, actually.
	This is actually a story from Real Clear Energy.
	You know, according to their own quote-unquote science, right?
	And it's kind of like what we saw with the pandemic MacGuffin.
	Well, we believe that there's a virus, and we believe that...
	It was engineered, or it escaped into the wild, or it was released deliberately, or it just evolved or whatever.
	But there's a virus out there.
	So what you need to do is wear a mask and blah, blah, blah.
	Even if their story was true, even if the MacGuffin really existed, the masks, just like the wind and solar, would make the MacGuffin worse.
	If you get yourself into their imaginary world.
	Okay, there's this guy from Krypton and he's Superman.
	But within this world, there are certain rules that govern this world.
	And if you set those aside, the narrative doesn't make any sense anymore.
	And that's the way it works with these MacGuffins.
	But they want you to believe that their remedy, which if the problem were real, and if the problem were as they described it, their remedy would only make it worse.
	Despite claims that wind and solar are less expensive than conventional power, the opposite is true.
	Of course.
	Wind and solar benefit from far more subsidies than other power sources.
	It merely shifts their high cost to taxpayers rather than directly to the customer's electricity bills.
	Wind turbines and solar panels must often be built, the massive ones we're talking about, to power the grid.
	They have to be built away from population centers.
	What does that require?
	Really extensive and expensive networks to get the power from there for the people.
	And of course, a lot of line losses because it is so far away.
	And that's what we saw in Texas as well.
	You know, these windmills that froze up the last year that we were there.
	That was massive expense of infrastructure that was borne by the Texas taxpayers.
	To get power out to these fields where these billionaires were set up to get even richer with the green subsidies.
	So they build these windmills, these solar panels, and they get massive government subsidies from the federal government and states.
	And then the state government pays for the infrastructure to deliver their power to other people.
	And they keep all the profits, we get all the expenses, and we get the unreliable electricity to boot.
	Great plan, isn't it?
	If you want to wind up owning nothing, that's one of the ways that we get there.
	Wind turbine solar panels are often built far from population centers.
	Very expensive to get it back in.
	Wind power is seven times more expensive than natural gas.
	Seven times.
	This is one of the reasons why this massive project being built by an oil company out of Scandinavia that is off the coast of Long Island.
	It is going to make the electricity there five to seven times more expensive.
	The wholesale cost will be about two and a half times what the current retail price is for that.
	And then the profits will be added on to that.
	Just so that we can do it with windmills.
	Because, hey, I'd like to do it by windmills.
	This is the kind of tyranny that we are somehow amazingly accepting from these people.
	You know, we have these corrupt, vain, ignorant rulers who determine that they're going to dictate one solution to us over whatever they think the problem is.
	And folks, that applies to the taxes as well, the tariffs as well.
	You can certainly these abstract, distant goals.
	Well, let's make America self-sufficient.
	Okay, great, great.
	How does that work?
	Conservatives have forgotten that government central planning does not work.
	America was great because America was free, because we had free markets, because we had individual liberty, because people could try things that worked in the free market, would sort out who was inefficient and who was efficient, and reward those who did a good job.
	Instead, the government is going to step in and it's going to push its solution.
	And that's what we're talking about with the tariffs.
	This whole idea of public...
	Just like public education, public health, public transportation.
	This is public wealth.
	We've got to protect the public wealth.
	Well, you're going to ignore the wealth of individuals?
	You're going to ignore the wealth of unfavored corporations?
	In order to make America wealthy?
	That is meaningless.
	It's nonsense.
	Every time they pull the wool over your eyes, they use a public collective abstraction.
	We're going to do this collectively, which means the government's got to do it to you, which means the government doesn't care what happens to any of you as individuals.
	They only care about the collective, and of course, they don't really care about that.
	They care about themselves individually.
	They use this veil of the collective good in order to rip everybody else off for their own good.
	That's the way this always works out.
	So wind power is seven times more expensive than natural gas power.
	Solar power is ten times more expensive.
	And when you look at the environmental performance, wind and solar, like hydro and nuclear, are emissions-free.
	Well, in theory, and in operation, right?
	But not in construction, not in creation of these devices.
	They arrive with a very, very heavy...
	Footprint according to their metric.
	Again, you know, they like to talk about the carbon metric.
	How much energy went into making these things?
	How much emissions, therefore?
	Well, by that metric, just like electric vehicles, they arrive very, very dirty.
	It takes years to get to a break-even point.
	And then at that point, they start to save a little bit on emissions if they last.
	But they're not very durable.
	Wind and solar.
	Score quite poorly regarding many other important environmental factors, however, so they're not even looking at the emissions, even with the emissions they don't look good.
	But then you pull in the other stuff.
	Wind and solar require disrupting, developing far more land and ecosystems than other power sources.
	Wind and solar generation directly kill far more animals than other power sources, including many protected and endangered species.
	The mining of toxic and rare earth minerals for wind turbines and solar panels is enormous.
	And uniquely harmful to water and to soil health.
	We won't have to worry about that too much longer, because with tariffs, that's going to come to a screeching halt.
	Oh, genius, says MAGA.
	Yeah, that's Trump's plan, is it?
	No, actually.
	Because there's a lot of other things that you would want to have, besides the things that you really don't want.
	So governments typically guarantee utilities approximately a 10% profit.
	On so-called green power projects and expenditures.
	As a result, utilities will typically lobby for the most expensive power sources to boost their total profit.
	If you're going to sell power and you get a guaranteed 10% profit, would you rather have 10% on $100 million or 10% on $1 billion?
	And of course, They get their 10% either way.
	They have a monopoly, so people have to buy their stuff.
	They have absolutely no incentive to save costs.
	They have an incentive to raise the cost.
	To raise the cost.
	So, climate damage from the biggest companies.
	This is from the New American from Selman Duke.
	He says, get ready for higher prices on everything if these people get their way.
	You now got a study coming out of Dartmouth.
	Let's hope that they get their federal funding cut.
	For doing a study like this, they certainly deserve it.
	They claim the world's largest companies have caused $28 trillion in climate damage.
	They said, we argue that the scientific case for climate liability is closed.
	It's settled, right?
	Because they said so.
	And hey, that's Dartmouth.
	Who are we to argue with Dartmouth?
	So now, they said, science is no longer an obstacle for the justicability.
	Justiceability.
	That's a new word they created at Dartmouth, you know.
	Of climate liability claims.
	Maybe they had to create that because they don't have a sufficient vocabulary to think about what they should actually use.
	In other words, the science is settled, as someone, Duke says.
	$28 trillion is just a little bit less than the sum of all goods and services produced in the entire United States all of last year.
	They said they used a thousand different computer simulations to translate the emissions into a dollar figure.
	Well, there you go.
	Artificial intelligence and computer simulation, the people who put it in have spoken.
	They got a printout.
	Or maybe better yet, you know, we got some AI reading it to you.
	No, it's garbage in, garbage out.
	Same thing.
	Always seen.
	Garbage in, garbage out.
	Selwyn Duke says, I used a thousand different computer simulations and found the world to be a better place without college academics.
	Yeah.
	The New American has refuted the anthropogenic climate change narrative.
	That's man-made, in other words.
	Accepting the Dartmouth thesis and the $28 trillion figure.
	One person says, even if you accept that.
	Well, do the other side of it, right?
	Here's the problem with models.
	If you don't really understand the problem, your model is going to be garbage.
	And so Dartmouth, even if they did a thousand different runs on their model, is still garbage.
	A person said, now do a study on the value of the goods that these companies have done.
	Vastly improved standard of living.
	Life-extending medications, increased food production, heating and cooling, etc.
	I'm not sure there's anything in modern society that's not dependent on what you call fossil fuels.
	It's just fuel.
	It's fuel.
	It's not fossils.
	And of related chemistry, I, for one, do not want to go back to 12th century living conditions.
	Besides the headwarming then, anyway.
	As late economics professor Walter E. Williams has pointed out, You can make anything look heavenly or hellacious by focusing only on its pros and cons.
	And this is exactly what the Dartmouth researchers did.
	So, again, I hope they're not getting millions of federal dollars, or billions.
	I mean, you know, Harvard.
	Nine billion dollars.
	And it's largely, you know, grants for research like this.
	Like this.
	That we don't need, we don't want.
	The reason the government funds...
	Research at places like Harvard and Dartmouth is because they're the court jesters of these tyrants.
	They give them the jokes that...
	Kind of like the writers for Jay Leno or whatever, you know.
	They give them the jokes that these guys read to you when they get on their teleprompters.
	And so these court jesters, these comedy writers, are highly paid.
	Yeah, because they come up with a justification for whatever these guys want to do to us.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at what is happening in other tech.
	There's some pretty amazing things that are about to break on the scene.
	We'll be in some pretty satanic things as well.
	We'll be right back.
	be right back.
	Welcome back.
	Before I get into the next section of news here, we've got some amazing stuff from tech.
	But I wanted to read this to you.
	This is from a listener who has been a listener for a very long time.
	He kindly, when we were trying to move here, remember we, about a year after the show finished, we were trying to move and it was a lot of cliffhanging drama.
	We had a listener friend here, and he wasn't a friend at the time, but he was a listener at the time, and we were talking about how everything was coming up right to the deadline, and he heard that, and he contacted us and helped us get the appraisal through quickly enough.
	I mean, we made it just literally with minutes to spare.
	We didn't think this was going to go through, that we'd be able to get here.
	And so it was really touch and go.
	And I remember at the time, John sent us an email and kindly offered to let us live with him in Montana.
	That's a little bit different than the climate that we were thinking of.
	And we had other people who did the same thing as well.
	It was amazing how kind people are.
	And I really appreciated this.
	And we got this email from him this weekend.
	And I said, well, even with a clean diet exercise and ongoing prayer life, I now have a tumor blocking my colon.
	You know what the doctors say?
	Standard of care is the only way to go, and they can't help their disdain and ridicule for my clean lifestyle and my faith.
	Two of them repeated on different occasions, well, how's that working out for you?
	And so, it's been on my mind all weekend.
	I've been praying for him.
	I wrote him back.
	I told him I'd let all of you know, because I know we have a lot of Christians who pray, and I know that prayer matters.
	And we don't really understand what God has in mind for any of us at any given time.
	And I shared some experiences that I had with family members who had cancer and family members who got treatment.
	And I just have to say, you know, when we look at this, you know, we're praying, and I hope you join with me in asking God to guide him, have a deeper fellowship with him at this time,
	and of course, for healing as well.
	And we always look to God for healing.
	I always think whenever something like this comes up, I always think about the story of...
	The king in Israel, Asa, who began his life and his reign with a lot of good things depending on God and God delivering him from overwhelming odds.
	And then towards the end of his life, he decided that he was going to make alliances with other people.
	He's going to do it on his own.
	I don't need God.
	I'm going to make an alliance with this king over here.
	And then he got hammered.
	Then there's just a really short tag about his life.
	It said he got a disease in his feet, and because he only looked to the physicians, he died.
	And that was kind of what had happened with him politically.
	It got to the point where he really wasn't looking to God for help.
	And so we look to God for help, and when we get help from God, we glorify Him for that.
	For him to do that to his glory.
	But we don't know what happens when we pray that God would bless him in this as we always do with these types of things.
	And we always pray for healing.
	In the case of Asa, it wasn't because he went to a physician that God let him die, but because he only went to a physician.
	You know, they're ordinary means that we can take use of.
	And I understand where he is because that's where I am as well when it comes to the medical community, especially when it comes to the cancer stuff.
	But, you know, there's other things that are out there.
	God has given us.
	And so I told him, you know, I said, you know, look at R&C Stores.
	I really, I've interviewed Gilbert Griffin.
	I've interviewed the guy who runs R&C Store.
	Joe Griffin wrote the book, A World Without Cancer, because he had a doctor who had had experiences with animals and experiences with friends who came to him.
	His nurse heard about that experience with his animal, giving them the apricot seeds, vitamin B12.
	Some people call it laetrile.
	But he got great results of that.
	I've known two people that that has helped, personally.
	And so this doctor goes to G. Edward Griffin and says, they're going to take my license if I talk about this, but I can't.
	I've got to get this information out.
	G. Edward Griffin didn't care.
	I don't care what they do to me.
	I'm going to tell people this.
	And so that book is there at RNC stores if you want to read about it.
	But you can also get the apricot seeds.
	You can get them if you don't, you know, if you can't.
	Chew the nuts because sometimes we get older and our teeth are not as good and our intestines aren't as good.
	You might have diverticulitis or something like that.
	You know, you can also take it as a pill.
	And so if you go to rncstores.com, you can save 10% if you use the code NIGHT.
	I don't make hardly anything out of that.
	I just tell you that to help you save some money.
	And I tell you that because I think that this is something that might help.
	And ivermectin.
	There's another one.
	There's a lot of talk about ivermectin, and again, I don't know anything about that.
	I don't know anybody that has taken ivermectin for cancer, but Dr. Makis, that is his first name, I can't remember it now.
	I have interviewed him, Dr. Makis, he has a substack.
	He's talked a great deal about it.
	He was an oncologist before he started to wake up to the crimes of I've interviewed him.
	He's pushed back against a lot of this garbage that they pushed through the pandemic.
	And so while we're on this, while we're on medical stuff, let me go to the pharmaceutical stuff before we go to the tech stuff.
	This is an article from the end of last week, and it was how your family doctor became a vaccine and drug enforcement agent.
	And the information has now come out.
	I've seen this being resurfaced several times in the last few months.
	We realized that the insurance companies were pressuring doctors, pressuring doctors to get everybody vaccinated.
	And if you don't vaccinate, They're going to put you out of practice.
	Because if you don't get vaccine acceptance up to a certain rate, they will cut you.
	What they pay you for the services that you do will be cut by such a large amount that you won't be able to stay in business.
	So typically if you're going to find somebody that isn't working for the pharmaceutical companies, they're also going to be somebody who doesn't take insurance.
	It's just the way it's going to work out.
	And there are doctors still out there like that because the insurance company, besides being willing to murder people or harm people for money, They're also tight with the money, and there's a great deal of overhead and delay,
	and they don't like to pay the doctors.
	They'll find any kind of excuse to pay the doctors.
	And so a lot of doctors will say, that's it, fine.
	I'm not going to do that.
	I'll cut my rates.
	I'll deal in cash-only patients.
	That's who we always used to deal with.
	And so this article says, remember when your family doctor was actually your doctor?
	That quaint historical period when physicians made independent medical judgments instead of reading from pharmaceutical scripts?
	When they looked at you as a unique human being rather than a collection of compliance metrics that needed correction?
	Those days are gone.
	Today's primary care physician is something entirely different.
	A pharmaceutical compliance officer with a prescription pad A corporate protocol to follow and overlords tracking their every move.
	And by the way, this is what's going to cause them to be replaced very quickly by artificial intelligence.
	I've been talking about this for more than 12 years.
	How a South Korean study was talking about by 2030, AI and robotics are going to take most jobs, about 50%.
	But they said it would be higher for doctors and lawyers.
	Because they have, especially the doctors, have put themselves in this position where they can be replaced by artificial intelligence that just does a look-up table.
	What are your symptoms?
	Okay, then this is the drug that you're going to take.
	They have transitioned from healers to hustlers, from medical professionals to medication pushers, from trusted advisors to glorified drug dealers.
	I recently had a conversation with a pediatrician that exposed the naked truth of modern medicine.
	He confessed to me with a mixture of resignation and discomfort that he was mandated to administer the PHQ-9A.
	That is a form that is screening for depression.
	And he is mandated to administer that to every adolescent.
	If they score above a certain threshold, he must...
	Offer an SSRI antidepressant.
	And see, the only thing is, we don't have to follow the doctor's recommendations just yet.
	But what Trump did in 2020 was a precursor to forcing you to do that.
	We will kick you out, first of all, of the medical system if you don't do what we demand.
	Secondly, we'll kick you out of society in general.
	You lose your job.
	Lose your home, the rest of the stuff, if you don't do what we demand.
	And they're giving themselves the ability to track that.
	That's what that was all about, folks.
	It was a dry run.
	It was moving the Overton window.
	And people still don't get it.
	They think we're winning.
	What if the teen had just been going through a breakup?
	Or having a normal adolescent mood swing, I asked him.
	He shrugged it off helplessly.
	Well, it doesn't matter.
	If they hit the number on the screening protocol, it says that I have to offer medication.
	But you know these drugs, these SSRIs, are more than double the risk of suicidal events in teenagers.
	The black box warning exists for a reason.
	Oh yeah, but we don't tell them about the black box warning, and neither does the pharmaceutical company, do they?
	Because they get a lot of black box warnings on phloxans and antibiotics.
	Physicians and pharmacists don't tell you about that either.
	The black box warning, folks, is there to protect the FDA and to protect the pharmaceutical company.
	It's not to protect the patient.
	And, of course, the doctors and the physicians have legal liability if they don't tell you that.
	So what it does is that the pharmaceutical company and the FDA know what this is about.
	But again, FDA stands for free to do anything if you're a pharmaceutical company.
	And so they work together to exonerate themselves and push the blame for the harm that they do onto physicians and pharmacists if they don't read you the black box label.
	So his response chilled me.
	He said, if something happened to the teen and I didn't follow protocol, if I didn't offer the medication, I could be held liable and my hands are tied.
	So this guy, and this is a Substack piece.
	This is from Roger McFillin.
	Roger McFillin, who is a doctor.
	And so he says, this highly educated physician with years of training wasn't making independent medical decisions.
	He was a street-level drug dealer who feared what would happen if he didn't move enough product for his overlords.
	He said, the modern physician fears liability and protocol violations.
	And he says, if you or a family member is unfortunate enough to schedule a routine checkup during a particularly bad week, well, then they push this kind of stuff on you and they don't tell you about it.
	If you are ignorant about it, well, then you're ripe for the pickings.
	He says, in a minute you're handed a questionnaire with loaded questions like, are you feeling bad about yourself?
	Or that you've let yourself or your family down, or that you are a failure?
	Well, maybe you've just been on social media, right?
	That could cause you to answer yes to all of those.
	Answer honestly and congratulations, you just self-diagnosed with a mild to moderate depression.
	It's what we used to call SAD.
	Your doctor spends approximately 90 seconds validating this, approbing questions like, then how long have you felt this way?
	Well, I think Lexapro would really help take the edge off.
	But it's when you express hesitation that the real sales pitch begins.
	Fear.
	This is where doctors transform into pharmaceutical fear merchants.
	You better take that antibiotic because, you know, hey, this could get out of control.
	I'm not going to tell you this.
	It's got a black box warning on it.
	You know, untreated depression can be very serious.
	It can worsen over time.
	It can affect your relationships, your work, your entire life.
	Depression.
	It is a serious medical condition.
	In fact, it's the leading cause of disability worldwide.
	In other words, refuse this and you are gambling with your life.
	Exactly the opposite of the truth.
	For teenagers, the fear tactics are directed at the parents.
	You don't want to take chances with your child's mental health, do you?
	So, what they don't mention is that the chemical imbalance theory of depression was thoroughly debunked years ago.
	Along with things like phrenology, where they may...
	Look at the bumps on your head to determine if you're a criminal or not, right?
	Or bloodletting.
	SSRIs have never proven to be clinically meaningful at all.
	As a matter of fact, they don't do anything.
	They can worsen it, in fact.
	They can create other symptoms, like your body feels like it's on fire.
	And so he's like, well, I'm not going to take that stuff again.
	Then what it does, it
	you into a suicidal murder.
	Murder envelope.
	Murder-suicide pills, we call them.
	Because you pop off of that thing all of a sudden.
	And then it triggers that reaction.
	He says, now look at the vaccine version of the same hustle.
	You visit for a completely unrelated issue, perhaps a sprained ankle or a skin rash.
	I see you haven't had your COVID or your flu shot this year.
	Framing is already perfect.
	You're behind on something that you need to catch up on.
	If you express hesitation, if you witness, you'll see the same script unfold.
	These vaccines are safe and effective.
	Side effects are usually just a sore arm or mild fatigue for a day or so.
	Will they tell you about myocarditis?
	Turbo cancer?
	No, they won't tell you about any of that.
	So, regardless of whether they're pushing pills or jabs, we see identical sales pitch every time.
	A master class in propaganda.
	They dramatically exaggerate even the most microscopic potential benefits while feverishly minimizing and dismissing or flat-out denying any risk of the practice case of a con artist.
	Oh, that's rare.
	Watch them transform a 1% absolute risk reduction into a 90% effective while simultaneously downgrading known serious adverse events to rare.
	Extremely rare.
	Corporate takeover medicine didn't happen overnight.
	So how did this happen?
	Interestingly enough, as he points at it, so Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act, helped to kill the independent practice.
	He says, Obamacare buried small practices under an avalanche of regulatory requirements, EHR mandates, compliant costs that made independence financially impossible.
	It's always done on the financial side, isn't it?
	Perhaps that's why these people with their global machinations of world dominance now do the World Economic Forum, right?
	You always do it through the economics side of it.
	Before Obamacare and the so-called Affordable Care Act, over half of physicians owned their practices.
	Today, that number has plummeted below 30%.
	The rest of them were forced to sell out.
	The corporate healthcare systems, where their compensation and their job security now depend on following the protocols from the pharmaceutical companies.
	The vaccination targets established by administrators who have never touched a stethoscope.
	Just like we saw during the lockdowns.
	All these shots are being called by the administrators who are getting paid by the Trump administration and the Biden administration.
	They weren't doctors.
	Doctors, many of them, were amazed at what was being demanded of them.
	This makes no sense, I say.
	Your family doctor didn't willingly transform into a pharmaceutical enforcement agent.
	They were legislated into compliance.
	Their medical autonomy sacrificed on the altar of corporatized healthcare.
	And where does this come from?
	Again, it is the, and let me just say this when we talk about money, you know, we lose the dollar's reserve status.
	It's going to change life in America in ways that you can't believe.
	And we'll be better off.
	We will be better off.
	Because it would break the power of the federal government to conjure up money that it uses to corrupt everything.
	To run its empire of global wars.
	And its empire of warring against us in every regard.
	I look forward to the collapse of the Federal Reserve System and the American dollar.
	I hope to see it happen in my lifetime.
	And it's going to be a tough thing.
	It's going to be a tough thing.
	It'll be a judgment from God, but it can also be a blessing if we break the power of the federal government to bribe and to blackmail everybody with their phony monopoly money.
	And that's what's at the basis of all this stuff.
	People couldn't see it because of the blind loyalty to political parties, the partisanship that was happening in 2020 under Trump, and then again in 2021 under Biden.
	They just don't see that it's the money.
	Follow the money.
	Follow the money.
	Following protocol with the unquestioning obedience of a first grader desperate for a gold star.
	Makes you wonder how many will flock to primary care medicine with those perfect little rule followers their entire lives.
	The ones who color-coded their highlighters in medical school, who memorized every algorithm without asking why, and spent their formative years as professional hoop jumpers.
	We know people like this, don't we?
	At high school, a lot of people like that.
	It was amazing.
	At one point, I don't want to take any more of these advanced classes because I want to get some friends who are real people.
	I don't want to hang out with this crowd at all.
	Not at all.
	The straight-A students who never risked a teacher's disapproval, who never questioned authority figures, even when those figures were obviously wrong.
	Critical thinking requires the courage to ask uncomfortable questions.
	A skill that was systematically extinguished.
	And these pristine academic specimens long before they wrote their first prescription.
	It's always going to be the students who do so well at school.
	And look, there's some exceptions.
	I remember one guy that I knew.
	He was a couple years older than me.
	He didn't have any classes.
	I knew him through band.
	And he became a pediatrician.
	Just the nicest guy.
	The most genuine guy.
	And he got out of it.
	And he didn't get out of it because he saw the medicine.
	This was long ago.
	He only practiced for a couple of years.
	And it just broke his heart that he couldn't help children.
	You know, when he had patients that didn't make it.
	So, he got out of the profession.
	And he started doing autopsies as a coroner.
	Because he just couldn't handle the failure of this medical so-called profession.
	They profess.
	Next time your primary care physician tries to prescribe you an SSR, remember you're not a patient, you're a customer.
	And they're trying to upsell you.
	Always ask Dr. Google.
	That's what my cardiologist sarcastically said to me when I refuse to take statins.
	It's like, no, no, no, I know about this thing.
	Oh, you've been talking to Dr. Google?
	And as I've said many times, I wish I had said it.
	I didn't want an argument with him.
	I wish I had said, well, one of us needs to be informed.
	One of us needs to care about my health, and it isn't you.
	You're not informed, and you don't care.
	Your BS detector doesn't need a medical degree to function properly, demand actual data, not rehearsed talking points, and walk out if necessary.
	The most rebellious act of modern health care isn't refusing treatment.
	It's insisting on informed consent in a system that has been designed to eliminate it.
	And of course, you know, we look at what is happening in Massachusetts.
	They propose laws to remove religious exemptions and informed consent and parental consent for vaccines.
	Your consent is not required, right?
	We're going to do it to you.
	I mean, think about it.
	When these people remove consent, they remove liability for the harm that they do.
	The number of vaccines that they want to put into kids goes from 3 to 76. And then autism and many, many other allergies and all kinds of immune system things go through the roof.
	Let's see.
	I wonder what those things have in common.
	If we take those four or whatever number of facts, if we put those things together, what kind of a conclusion could we reasonably come to?
	No liability for anything you do.
	Explodes the number of shots, and so does all of these conditions with children.
	And so does their bank accounts also explode.
	I wonder what it could be about.
	I just can't figure it out.
	I had somebody contact me.
	They sounded like they were pretty good.
	I can help you with Instagram.
	I came across your program.
	On Apple iTunes, which in and of itself was surprising.
	I didn't know anybody could discover my stuff anymore.
	But you can find the links to it at davidknight.news.
	But this person says, so maybe I've got some great ways to help you.
	And I didn't reply to it.
	And then she sent a follow-up, which I thought was pretty clever.
	She'd sent it a couple of different times, and she said, so this is me and you talking.
	Sometimes a picture's worth a thousand words, and what it has is a little gif that is repeating, and it's one of the little yellow minions, you know, from the cartoon movie, hitting a ping-pong ball across a table, and the minion on the other side is just kind of slumped over asleep.
	And the ball hits them, bounced back, and then the other one hits it again.
	You know, it just keeps repeating like that.
	So this is kind of our conversation.
	And so it's like, do I take the time to write back to her and tell her, you know, yeah, I'm that guy who looks like I'm asleep, but I've actually been killed on Instagram because they don't want me talking about stuff like I just talked about, right?
	So that's the reality of where it is.
	It's like, I don't need you to try to, Optimize my Instagram feed because I'm not allowed there.
	Like I'm not allowed on YouTube or on Spotify or on Vimeo or on PayPal or Venmo and on and on and on.
	I mean, frankly, I just don't care.
	I just don't care.
	People, you know, if...
	There's something that I can say that can help somebody.
	God will make sure that they find the show.
	Otherwise, I just don't care anymore at this point.
	I'm not going to push it.
	And every time we try to do something, it's cut.
	So obviously, there's something else going on here.
	So minors will be able to consent to vaccines.
	Without parental knowledge or consent if this bill goes through in Massachusetts.
	Because, again, they don't want your consent.
	This is called the Community Immunity Bill.
	There we go.
	Public health again.
	Health for the nebulous public that doesn't include individuals, especially not children.
	It would allow minors to consent to preventative care, including vaccination, without parental consent or knowledge.
	This is also going to be able to, well, you know, we had to get you some preventative gender transition stuff, because otherwise you might commit suicide.
	Interestingly enough, that's always their basis, isn't it?
	And yet, as you're going to hear, I've got amazing testimony from a mother and her daughter.
	She homeschooled her daughter, and then like so many people that I've known in homeschooling, they said, okay, well, now they're high school age, and I know they're mature enough that they can handle being in, You know, a regular government school and they put them in and then you see horrible things happening with them.
	I don't think, you know, it depends.
	Different children are different.
	But I think that's a real shock to them at a time when they are desperate to get peer approval.
	I think that's a big mistake.
	But anyway, they said it would allow private daycare schools and colleges to refuse religious exemptions and it would impose additional vaccines like the...
	COVID-19 mRNA trump shots.
	And even things like that that are not required by the Department of Public Health.
	It would allow private daycare schools and colleges to go beyond what the so-called public health departments are doing.
	It would subject religious and medical exemptions to state approval.
	Well, so I have to get your approval, as we saw so many times.
	Well, I know.
	Tell me what your beliefs are.
	Let me see if I can...
	Trip you up on your Christian religious beliefs.
	It's like, it's none of your business.
	You don't get to set judgment on that.
	I mean, I remember, you know, the Vietnam War ended right as I graduated high school in 1973.
	But, you know, when the draft thing came up, I registered for the draft, and I sent in a thing, and I said, I'm a conscientious objector.
	I'm not going to fight your war.
	They said, well, you've looked at your conscientious objection, and we've rejected it.
	It's like, well, I reject your rejection.
	I'm not going to fight your war no matter what you do.
	Put me in jail, whatever you want to do.
	I will not fight your war for you.
	I'll fight you.
	I won't fight your war.
	Especially if you're not going to recognize my constitutional rights.
	I will fight you.
	Anyway.
	So, it would grant the Department of Health expansive authority to change immunization and exemption requirements.
	It would require doctors to sign religious exemptions.
	A doctor of divinity who resides in this vicinity.
	You know, that's Gilbert and Sullivan.
	Anyway, exclude healthy, unvaccinated children even in the absence of an outbreak or an emergency.
	Or a declared one.
	West Virginia denied religious exemptions until January the 14th when Governor Patrick Morrissey signed an executive order to allow religious exemptions.
	Good for him.
	The legislature wouldn't do it, so he did an executive order.
	Maybe what he said was, this is a constitutional emergency.
	We're not obeying the Constitution.
	So I'm going to obey the Constitution and allow for religious exemptions.
	On March the 24th, West Virginia lawmakers defeated a bill that would have codified his executive order.
	So the legislature there in West Virginia is not alongside him, but he has the power to do it.
	The bill died with a 42 to 56 vote on the floor of West Virginia's House of Delegates after having passed the state Senate 20 to 12. So, again, meanwhile you have R.F.K.
	Jr.
	Is going to announce bans on artificial food dyes and cereal, snacks, and beverages.
	You know, they've got these.
	They've been, you know, putting some pretty toxic chemicals in so they can get the right pretty colors.
	Which is stupid, right?
	They put toxic chemicals in so the food will go through their food processors properly.
	Or so that it'll be appealing to you and so forth.
	All that needs to be banned.
	Still, he's putting the cart before the horse, isn't he?
	I mean, you know, aren't there...
	Stop the vaccines, first and foremost, especially the COVID vaccine.
	And I think when you look at this, you know, he's majoring on the minors.
	And I think when he focuses on banning food dyes, I think he's showing his true colors.
	And his true colors are that he's scared to death of pharmaceutical companies.
	We'll see what happens.
	I hope I'm wrong.
	I hope I'm wrong.
	The dyes are found in dozens of foods, including breakfast cereals.
	Candy snacks and beverages.
	I think I saw a picture on Babylon Bee, because this came out about a week ago.
	And they showed some of these fruity pebbles and everything, and they were all just white.
	Who wants to eat that white food?
	I don't know.
	It's okay to be white food, I guess.
	Maybe better than some of these toxic dyes that are there.
	So we're going to take a break, and when we come back, I'm going to take a look at some other technology.
	We've had a lot of people who've left comments here I want to catch up on.
	On Rumble, Dougalug, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that a great deal.
	Thank you.
	We're really down this month.
	On Rumble, Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard Liberty Conspiracy.
	He's there on Twitter, Rumble, as well.
	X, you know, Twitter, X. He says, the Dartmouth pair...
	Are deeply tied to multiple government subsidized projects and schools.
	Most of their work has been subsidized by tax money.
	There you go.
	You know when Eisenhower talked about the military-industrial complex?
	He actually talked about the military-industrial-academic complex.
	Yeah.
	It'd be great if we just get rid of all of the subsidies of the universities.
	As a matter of fact, there was an article by...
	It's by Vox or by Politico.
	One of these places said, you know, Trump is out there.
	He's going to kill one of our best exports.
	And it's like, oh, really?
	And said, not even with tariffs.
	It's like, really?
	What are they talking about?
	Well, you know, he's coming after these students on campus because he doesn't like their free speech, their op-ed pieces about what's going on in Gaza.
	It's like, okay, yeah, I, you know, I understand what that is.
	And he's deporting students, which I don't agree with.
	And they said, so that's causing all of these, you know, one of the biggest things that we export is education.
	And I thought, how horrible to think that what goes on in our universities is going out to the entire world.
	You know, I look at things like that.
	I look at our entertainment industry out of Hollywood, our universities, and I think, what a cesspool.
	America is.
	We're like an open sewer polluting the world with Hollywood, with academia, and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's like, God doesn't judge us.
	It's just amazing.
	And so, you know, what is it?
	The taxpayers are subsidizing these universities so that we can educate foreign students.
	And they said, we just don't see it as an export because these people take their education back with them.
	Yeah, take it back with them and they become.
	Oh, just disgusting.
	Think about what it is.
	On kick, Dissident Voice says David's birthday is on Wednesday.
	How did you know that?
	Thank you so much.
	I appreciate that.
	I'm really bad with birthdays.
	I mean, I did remember that one, but happy birthday, David, if I forget.
	That's Steve Swan.
	Thank you so much.
	I appreciate that.
	It's a milestone this year and hit 70 and had a friend who sent me a text and he said, I said that.
	I said it's a milestone.
	I said, well, the only way that you can avoid a milestone like that is with a tombstone.
	So it's there.
	It's just gradually creeping up on us.
	Thank you, Steve.
	I appreciate that.
	On Rumble, Wally Walrus says, Big Pharma ruins lives.
	Yeah.
	My daughter's mother is a good example.
	Doctors get them hooked, and they have a lifelong addiction.
	The benzos are the worst.
	Xanax.
	Klonopin.
	Yeah, that's the other thing, too.
	You know, when you look at this opioid thing.
	And, of course, fentanyl is a synthetic opioid.
	They're still doing that kind of stuff.
	Everybody's focused on the illegal fentanyl.
	But the fact is that with opioids, they addicted people who were not looking for even recreational stuff.
	And even if somebody is looking for recreational stuff, I think it's a crime, what they're doing.
	But if you go in there because you...
	Injured yourself.
	And I remember Chris Christie talked about that.
	Yeah, I have a friend.
	Oh, no, I'm not going to legalize marijuana because I had a friend who, that's what he said, this is the non sequitur he had.
	I have a friend who was very successful in law school, had a successful practice, a great family, and he was in great shape, and he was jogging and hurt his back, and they got him addicted to opioids.
	He lost his job, lost his practice, lost his family.
	And committed suicide.
	So I'm not going to legalize marijuana.
	It's like, how is that?
	I mean, you can...
	Anyway, that's the thinking of Chris Christie.
	But, you know, they get people hooked on this who are not just looking to fill some kind of a hole in their life by doing something recreationally.
	And even if somebody is looking for that, how dare you push these drugs to them, right?
	That's still no excuse.
	On Kik, SoloCat1980, I refer to the doctor's office as the Quack Shack.
	That's good.
	That puts it in perspective.
	On Kik, G. Talent says, went to the doctor for a checkup.
	They asked 50 questions up front.
	They said it's a new system.
	They said if you answer one group right, they would recommend COVID and flu shot.
	And if you answer another group right, they would recommend depression and SSRI drugs.
	They did that with Karen.
	She just went to the dentist's office.
	And so, I mean, it wasn't like they're trying to vaccinate her or something like that.
	They started asking her all these personal questions.
	And she said, I don't like answering these personal questions.
	And the lady said, well, you don't have to answer them.
	I just have to ask them.
	It's like, okay, well, I'm not going to answer you.
	I've got to take the Fifth Amendment in order to get an appointment with a doctor, even with a dentist.
	It's absolutely insane, the system that we have.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	be right back.
	back. Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	We're on Rumble.
	Audi. Modern Retro Radio.
	Good to see you.
	I haven't seen you there for a while.
	It says, Chris Christie opposes ending the drug war because private prisons and the prison industrial complex own his fat behind.
	You're absolutely right.
	I remember...
	I interviewed New Jersey weed man, and he had an interesting story because it was about, you know, he was up for charges because he was heavily invested in his weed.
	It was like his entire life was built around marijuana and marijuana use, which, you know, again, not as bad as what the government had in mind for him.
	They wanted to send him away to prison and never let him out.
	But he beat the rap by doing jury nullification.
	And in order to do jury nullification, he couldn't find a lawyer who would argue jury nullification, so he represented himself.
	He had a great story, a couple of trials.
	I've told the story many times, just briefly.
	First trial, he goes, he figures that most people don't want to lock him up for life.
	Because he smokes pot.
	And so he thought, I think I can beat this.
	So he goes on the first one and he takes the New Jersey Constitution, which says that the jury is there to judge the law, not just the facts of the case.
	And the penalty that's going to be assessed and that type of thing.
	So he holds that up.
	He puts that up.
	And the judge said, take that down.
	I'm going to put you in jail right now for contempt.
	So he took it down.
	He said, but the jury had already seen it.
	They voted to acquit him seven to five.
	But then the prosecutor decided that he's going to come back because they can do that two or three times.
	And so they came back a second time to retrial him.
	And that time he does the same thing.
	Different judge.
	The judge lets him leave that up.
	And the judge let him leave that up and explain the New Jersey Constitution to the jury.
	And they acquitted him.
	Twelve to zero.
	And so he had an interesting story about that.
	And he also, I had him on a couple of times to talk about jury nullification.
	And he talked about how Chris Christie knew him.
	And would recognize him.
	He'd see Chris Christie and he'd yell out to him.
	He'd get a big smile and he'd come over and shake my hand, but he wants to lock me up for life.
	Yeah, that's what you see with these politicians.
	Just amazing.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about technology here.
	We got the top chatbots are giving horrible financial advice.
	When are they going to have them stop that?
	You know, they've already put in breakers to keep a lot of these chatbots from giving you medical advice so that they don't get sued.
	When are they going to do it about financial advice?
	The world's top chatbots are still strikingly bad at giving financial advice.
	Some AI researchers posed a series of 12 finance questions to the four leading large language models, OpenAI's ChatGPT4.0, DeepSeq Version 2, Musk's Grok3 Beta,
	and Google's Gemini 2. To test them, they said each chatbot proved to be, quote, consistently verbose, but often incorrect.
	Now, that's a phrase to remember.
	Somebody asked you about artificial intelligence.
	It's consistently verbose, but often incorrect.
	We keep seeing this over and over again.
	One subject after the other.
	I mean, when I first tried ChatGBT a couple years ago, I just asked it questions about the pandemic, vaccines, and climate change.
	It's like, I'm done.
	Yeah, this thing is rigged.
	It's been programmed to lie to you, just like Anderson Cooper.
	Using a simple scale where a score of zero included completely incorrect financial analysis and a 0.5, denoted a correct financial analysis with mathematical errors, and a 1. Was that it was correct on both the math and the financial analysis.
	No chatbot earned higher than a 5 out of 12 point maximum.
	Now, that sentence in and of itself sounds like it came from...
	Okay, so you got this thing as scores from 0 to 1, with 1 being a perfect score.
	But then none of them scored more than 5 out of 12 points maximum.
	Where did that come from?
	Anyway, so disregarding whoever wrote this and their phrasing of the way the scoring was done.
	There are some interesting examples here.
	Some of the chatbot responses are so bad...
	That they defied the Walter Bradley experts' expectations.
	When Grok, for example, was asked to add up a single month's worth of expenses for a Caribbean rental property whose rent was $3,700 and whose utilities ran $200 per month, what do you think it came up with?
	Let's see.
	$3,700 rent plus $200 expenses.
	Okay.
	Utilities.
	That would be $3,900.
	No, it said $4,900.
	$4,900.
	They can't add numbers together.
	The chatbots also failed for the study to generate any intelligent analysis for the relatively basic financial questions that the researchers posed.
	Throughout it all, the chatbots were dangerously glib.
	That's the key thing, right?
	They act as if they know.
	When they don't, boy, don't we see that everywhere.
	But nobody does it better than AI.
	That's key.
	So, the researchers noted that all of the LLMs they tested present, quote, a reassuring illusion of human-like intelligence, along with a breezy conversational style, enhanced by friendly exclamation points.
	It reminds me of that figure robot, you know, that they were interacting with, and how it spoke like a California surfer dude.
	Oh yeah, sure, yeah, I get what you mean, yeah, okay, well here's the thing, you know, that type of stuff.
	They come off to the average user as confident and correct.
	And yet it's a bluff, isn't it?
	And then this story about Mike Lindell, the MyPillow guy.
	And this is from Futurism, which does not like his politics.
	The headline says, the MyPillow guy's lawyers used AI in court.
	And you'll never guess how that turned out.
	And I feel sorry for Mike Lindell.
	I mean, he's somebody who had a rough life of addiction.
	He got it together.
	He built a successful company.
	And then he ruined it all on this election nonsense.
	And I share his skepticism and disbelief of the voting in general, right?
	But especially of electronic voting.
	And especially a vote by mail and all the rest of this stuff.
	But you've got to be able to prove it, right?
	And he was an attractive defendant because he had a lot of money.
	And he just got taken to the cleaners.
	And I think he's very sincere.
	I feel very sorry for him.
	And I don't celebrate in this happening.
	I just mention it because it's not really him.
	It was his lawyers that did this.
	A federal judge has accused Lindell of filing a legal document with nearly 30 defective citations.
	One of his attorneys, Christopher Koch-Aroff, wrote, and it, quote, utilized generative artificial intelligence, unquote.
	So, again, this is yet to be determined if Mike Lindell even knew anything about this, or if he just had a really bad and dumb lawyer.
	The brief was full of misquotes and miscited cases, sometimes referencing case law that simply did not exist.
	It was all made up.
	AI had hallucinated them, as the tech is prone to do in order to, quote, complete its prompt.
	And again, we look at Jonathan Turley, who's a legal commentator, conservative on Fox and other places, and he talked about how he was libeled.
	By AI.
	Made up a story about sexual harassment that happened with him taking kids on a field trip or something to Alaska.
	And he goes, first of all, never done a field trip.
	I've never been to Alaska.
	The whole thing was made up.
	But it came up with all these nonsense details and everything.
	And it's done it not just to him, but to other people as well.
	If you type a legal question into Google search function, then generative AI is all too ready to answer, said a legal columnist.
	Not until this court asked the lawyer directly whether the document was a product of generative artificial intelligence did the lawyer admit that he did, in fact, use AI.
	Given the pervasiveness of the errors and the legal authority provided to it, this court treats this representation with skepticism.
	The federal judge has now given Lindell's lawyers 10 days to argue why they shouldn't face disciplinary proceedings.
	Maybe they should ask AI.
	There's actually a fairly recent story about another lawsuit that I forgot.
	I won't bore you in one of the details, but basically this guy lost big in Australian court, and afterwards he went in and asked AI, well, what do you think of my case?
	And it said, oh, you're definitely going to win, basically, or strongly implied that he was going to win after he had already lost and had a massive judgment against him.
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Oh, there's that.
	Yeah.
	But, I mean, just making up stuff, right?
	That's the other thing.
	Just made up citations, you know, citing other cases that didn't exist, evidently.
	And so, again, there's no indication as to whether or not Mike Lundell knew anything about this.
	They said this is far and away not the first gaffe of this particular lawyer.
	During a trial which took place over Zoom last year, during, you know...
	Over Zoom, because things were locked down, I guess.
	They caught the lawyer relaxing without his pants on before beginning his cross-examination.
	So, yeah, it's absolutely, when we look at AI, be very careful about it.
	Palatir, meanwhile, is trying to give AI a moral purpose.
	I've mentioned this before, you know, Alex Karp, who is one of the co-founders of...
	Palantir, and financial backer for it is Peter Thiel.
	It's a horrific, horrific example of data mining, surveillance, anticipatory intelligence, geospatial intelligence, all the rest of this.
	That company is an abomination.
	And so now he's trying to make a moral case for all of this, which is kind of interesting.
	And the person who wrote this on the Free Beacon actually is sympathetic to him.
	And so they make the case that Silicon Valley has turned its back on the American people by poaching talented engineers who might have done nationally important work and refusing to collaborate with the government on meaningful ventures.
	Wait a minute.
	What does that mean?
	What does nationally important work mean?
	See, Alex Karp and these other people, he's somebody who works for the military-industrial complex.
	And he says these people have sold out.
	They're making consumer products because they want to get rich quick.
	What absolute, utter hypocrisy.
	You want to talk about getting rich quick?
	You go to work for the military-industrial complex, they will throw money at you, which they have thrown at him.
	It's unbelievable the amount of money that they throw to Palantir and people of that ilk.
	You're much more likely to get rich making surveillance systems and bombs For the military-industrial complex than you are making consumer products out there.
	That's a very competitive marketplace.
	But he goes in there and he schmoozes with his people who know others.
	And you want to talk about something that's nationally important?
	I think it is.
	I think it is nationally important, but I think it's an abomination what these people are doing.
	These are the people who are going to be data mining everything that we do, collating all this.
	This is the basis.
	Of the police surveillance state.
	And he's out there virtue signaling about that.
	He said, you know, we need more engineers who are going to do the kind of work that I do for the police state.
	Rather than going out there making consumer products.
	I see it exactly the opposite.
	And I've said this many times.
	I said, it amazed me, you know, when I got out of college.
	And, you know, I interviewed.
	And when I went to Texas Instruments, because they were bringing me in, they wanted me to interview with a lot of different groups.
	And so they had me interview with some of the military-industrial complex.
	And I wasn't interested at all in working for them.
	And because it's like, I don't know, if I do something for them, I'm going to be part of this system that, you know, politicians are going to use it to kill civilians other places.
	I don't want to be a part of that.
	I want to be...
	I don't have anything to do with that supply chain of death.
	And so I didn't want to get involved in that.
	But he says, closer collaboration between technology industry and government is what's needed.
	I'm sorry, I think it's already too close.
	I think the military-industrial complex, as Eisenhower warned us, has taken over science and weaponized everything against us.
	Many of America's brilliant minds, he said, in the technology sector are squandering their talents in the absence of a national project.
	Well, he's got a national project.
	The surveillance state.
	They champion artificial intelligence and its applications to security and defense as the next all-in national project.
	Isn't that great?
	And this person likes that, that Free Beacon.
	They think that's great.
	No, I think that's reprehensible, frankly.
	We shouldn't even be doing that.
	He says, so they've got several different arguments.
	First argument that they make, they say Silicon Valley is overwhelmingly uninterested in working on national projects such as food, shelter, water, education, medicine, and surveillance.
	Wait a minute, how did that get in there?
	One of these things is not like the others, right?
	And of course, if you want to provide people with food, shelter, water, education, medicine, you don't need the federal government to do that.
	Lock people up to kill us, to steal from us.
	He said, instead, these people favor get-rich-quick consumer-driven pursuits.
	That's exactly what he's done with his federal money.
	Get-rich-quick.
	The second part, he says, is the hollowing out of the American mind.
	He says, part of this is, and this I guess is what resonated with this person at Free Beacon.
	You know, they're talking about technological agnosticism.
	And so, Alex Karp and his co-author are decrying the fact that Western civilization has retreated from Western civilization, or at least academia has, right?
	American history has become more foreign to American students, coupled with decreasing church attendance and religious affiliation, particularly among those adept at science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
	The answer to the question, what should we build?
	It becomes whatever we can.
	And see, I've said that about people like Alex Karp from the very beginning.
	Again, just because you can do it doesn't mean that you should.
	And I've said over and over again, I've seen engineers who all they're concerned about is the intellectual puzzle before them.
	And if they can solve that, they don't care how it's going to be used.
	I've got, you know, even more so than the amount of money that they get.
	It's the thrill that they get from solving that.
	And I've talked about that.
	That is so widespread.
	Hugo de Garis, again, talking about it in the Art of Lake War.
	As he interviews, as he does a presentation, he asks the scientists in the audience, if you knew that you were going to build something that's going to kill everybody, would you do it?
	You're going to make some kind of a...
	He posits the idea that AI is going to become this godlike intelligence that's going to kill everybody.
	Would you still do it?
	The vast majority of them will say yes.
	Still do it.
	Why?
	Of the intellectual pursuit, right?
	So yeah, it's just the opposite.
	You know, where do we get these values from?
	So anyway, they end their book with a call to rebuild the technological republic.
	Again, they want the technological republic.
	They want a technocracy.
	And they may hide behind the ideas of Western civilization in the same way that Elon Musk may hide behind his, quote, pro-natalism.
	He's not pro-children.
	He's not pro-family.
	He sees himself as some kind of an elitist patriarch that's going to populate the earth with super-intelligent kids just like him because he thinks that's what he is.
	The book calls for a generation of engineers who are engaged with and curious about the world, the movement of history, its contradictions, not merely skilled at programming.
	Return of community, commitment to the nation, and of faith.
	Okay, so if you want to return community, commitment to the nation, and faith, why are you spying on everybody?
	Justify what you do with that.
	Apply that same standard to yourself.
	When we look at the kinds of things that are being created, technology is always a two-edged sword.
	It can be used for good.
	It can be used for evil.
	Here's an example.
	This is a 19-year-old influencer girl, Tilly Lockie.
	She is a double amputee.
	She lost her arms when very young.
	And she's been working with a company that is giving her bionic arms for the past nine years.
	It's a UK startup called Open Bionics has just unveiled the world's first wireless bionic arm.
	They call it Hero.
	It's so advanced that the hand can fully detach and amble about on its own like the Addams Family thing.
	Yeah, that's exactly what you want, right?
	It makes me think of there was this schlocky horror film called The Hand, and this woman loses her hand, and it takes on a life.
	This is before even Adam's Family and the Thing takes on a life of its own, and it's going out, taking on vengeance of other people.
	You know, it's crawling this hand that's crawling really bad.
	It's a lot of fun to watch the movie because it was so poorly done.
	By the way, we did see on Friday, with Ryan's recommendation for The Love of the Road, a great recommendation, Jerry and Marge Go Large, because I was talking about how the Texas lottery was rigged, and this is a true story about Massachusetts lottery that was rigged,
	and what a good film that was.
	We all really enjoyed that, especially knowing how...
	That it was real and that this has already happened again in an even bigger way.
	You know, they put together a group that was a syndicate out of the UK to do the latest heist in Texas.
	Anyway, she said, the young girl said, I can move it around even when it's not attached to the arm.
	It can just go on its own mission, which is kind of crazy.
	She lost both of her hands to meningitis as a toddler.
	Effortlessly, she pulls off the still-writhing bionic hand, places it on her bed, and then sends it inching toward her phone.
	The hand can crawl away like it's got a mind of its own, she said.
	There you go.
	It is crawling away.
	And she's controlling that remotely, right?
	It doesn't have a mind of its own, but she's able to control that.
	And the reason that that works that way, and one of the reasons why this is superior, is because it doesn't require surgery or implants.
	It operates wirelessly.
	And so what it does is it looks at the signals coming from your muscles, interprets that, and then wirelessly sends it out to the hands on this prosthetic.
	It's all fully 3D printed.
	It does not rely on a chip implant or surgery.
	It's fully muscle-operated.
	She said it operates off of two signals, a squeeze motion with her arm that closes the hand and a flex motion that opens it.
	More advanced movements, like hand gestures, are performed through something like a menu system, she said.
	After working closely with Open Bionics for nearly a decade now, one thing that surprised her the most was from the new arms was how strong they were.
	She said at first, when I put them on, I was crushing everything.
	The level of progress overall has startled her.
	She said, Well, it's not.
	So that's the positive side of this.
	And yet, when you look at the other issues, this is from Aaron Kiriati.
	He's talking about the next phase of surveillance that people like Alex Karp want to get involved in.
	The fact is that it will go under your skin.
	He said, I recently gave a talk at Hillsdale College on AI.
	The transcript of that, as well as the video, are on Zero Hedge.
	And in it...
	For the most part, what he's talking about is the desire of people like Yuval Noah Harari.
	And as I said, I always find it encouraging to read Harari's projections about the future.
	He's somebody who comes across as so arrogant and so proud and so opposed to God.
	When I look at his writing, I realize this guy doesn't hate me nearly as much as he hates God.
	He hates humanity.
	He hates other people, for sure.
	But he really hates God.
	And so his fight is with God.
	And God is more than capable of handling people like him, as we remember from the Tower of Babel.
	He said, COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize total biometric surveillance.
	And I agree with him on that.
	So this is why I harp still, five years later, on what Trump kicked off.
	That precedent that he did.
	That moving of the Overton window that he did.
	And how everybody, for the most part, the vast majority of our population, just went along with it, right?
	And not all of us did.
	I'm sure you didn't.
	But, you know, for the most part, people went along with it.
	And now they're coming back and telling everybody, oh, it was an accident.
	It was an accident.
	Nobody's bad, right?
	No.
	They meant for it to be this way.
	If we want to stop this epidemic, we need not just to monitor people, said Yuval Harari.
	We need to monitor what is happening under their skin.
	He said this as it was happening.
	He said, what we have seen so far is corporations and governments collecting data about where we go, who we meet, what movies we watch.
	The next phase is surveillance going under our skin.
	Well, see, that phase, he's talking about where we go, who we meet, what movies we watch, what books we read, what our opinions are about everything.
	That's what the internet and social media was designed for by the intelligence agencies, and that's what people like Alex Karp are giving them.
	And he has the audacity, the lecturers on morality, and on history, and on ethics, and on politics.
	Anyway, now humans are developing even bigger powers than ever before, he said.
	Listen, this is where the real God complex comes in.
	He says, we really are acquiring divine powers of creation and destruction.
	We are really upgrading humans into gods.
	We are acquiring the power to re-engineer human life.
	He says, humans are now hackable animals.
	You know, the whole idea that humans have this soul or spirit, that they have free will, that nobody knows what's happening inside of me, so whatever I choose, whether in the election or in the supermarket, that's my free will.
	He said, well, that's over.
	No, it's not.
	These people, just like B.F. Skinner, just like Harari, all these people who seek to become gods, they are at war with the real God.
	And I'm more than happy to see him.
	Destroy them and their dreams.
	On an individual level, who knows?
	I mean, God could destroy them by turning them towards Him.
	He could take the scales off of their eyes.
	He could open their hearts.
	He could take away, you know, He could breathe life on the dead bones of these people.
	Or not.
	I don't know what He'll do.
	But all I know is that if these people have designs to get under our skin, If they want to treat us as animals, well, we are made in the image of God, and you are attacking both God and his creation.
	People will look back, he said, and identify the COVID crisis that Trump did to us in his first regime as the moment when, quote, a new regime of surveillance took over, especially surveillance under the skin, which I think is the most important development of the 21st century,
	which is the ability to hack human beings.
	So is he trying to tell us something about what's in the VAX?
	Is that like nanotech stuff here that you've got some insider information on, Noel?
	Yuval Noah Harari?
	Yeah, what is he actually trying to tell us with all of that stuff?
	Unless we collectively decline, this is Aaron Kiriati, he says, unless we collectively decline to participate in the new social experiment of digital IDs, Tied to private demographic financial location movement and biometric data.
	You see, that was the whole point.
	We had to lock us down and give us approval for everything.
	Shut down everything unless it is permitted.
	Being able to track us.
	And remember, you know, that was when the World Economic Forum put out its idea of the common past that I talk about in the commercial that we have.
	And they came up with a formula for it.
	Everybody created their own, you know, version of that.
	But they needed to have a global digital ID so they could control people's movements, so they could control this fantasy pandemic that they had.
	So he says, unless we collectively decline to participate in this, this is all going to become a mechanism for bulk data harvesting and tracking of populations around the globe.
	And they're going to use companies like Palantir.
	They are right there.
	At the very epicenter of this.
	Well, God can destroy anything that is made by man.
	Is he made?
	Anyway, the contempt.
	That you've heard before of Yuval Harari, calling us useless eaters.
	And what do we do with these useless people?
	And his solution, of course, as we have covered before, is basically a combination of drugs and computer games.
	He says people need to have some sense of meaning in life, even if they are meaningless and worthless people.
	So we'll get them addicted to drugs and to computer games, so they'll leave us alone.
	See?
	That's how you fight back against this kind of stuff.
	Science, he said, is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design.
	Not the intelligent design of some god above the cloud, but our intelligent design and the design of our clouds, the IBM cloud, the Microsoft cloud.
	These are the new driving forces of evolution, and they may enable life to break out into the inorganic realm.
	Well, think about the absurdity of that.
	Right?
	He's struggling with these very, very crude systems.
	While he casts aspersions on, well, intelligent design.
	No, we'll do real intelligent design.
	You know, we'll do it with our AI and our robotics and all the rest of the stuff, which are crude imitations of what God has created.
	And he can look at the world around him and he's the kind of fool that can look at a car and think that it just...
	Came together on its own.
	But now he's going to modify that car using intelligence.
	But he didn't need intelligence to get the car to start with, right?
	You know, we see a car and we ask who made that.
	Was that Ford, GM?
	Was it Mazda?
	Who was it that made that car?
	We don't assume.
	It just came together.
	But he does.
	And then he thinks he's going to make a slight modification to it.
	Right?
	He's going to change the steering wheel or something.
	And thinks that he's a god because he can change the steering wheel on a car that was built by somebody else.
	But he denies that the car was built by anybody with any intelligence.
	It just came together.
	It just came together on its own.
	The opening sentence here perfectly echoes the original definition of eugenics, and that is, science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by our intelligent design.
	Francis Galton.
	Charles Darwin's cousin said, What nature does blindly, slowly, and ruthlessly, he says evolution by natural selection, man may do providently, quickly, and kindly.
	Again, what foolishness.
	Charles Darwin's cousin, Galton, who, when we look at eugenics, Inexorably tied to the theory of evolution, which has been thoroughly debunked.
	It's absolutely absurd.
	This project is physically and metaphysically impossible, says Aaron Curiotti, because man is an inextricable unity of body and soul.
	Not some ghost in a machine, not merely a bit of software that is transferable to another piece of hardware.
	These people don't even know what they're trying to reproduce or transfer, right?
	They call themselves transhumanists, and they're going to transfer whatever they are, or whatever their consciousness is, they're going to transfer it into some kind of a machine.
	I've had these conversations with them before.
	So what are you?
	They don't know.
	They have no idea what they are going to transfer.
	Is it some combination of electrical signals?
	No.
	No, it's not at all.
	Transhumanism is clearly a religion, a particular type of neo-gnostic religion.
	Interestingly enough, you have doctors saying that they're going to inject gold into eyeballs to restore lost vision.
	And I saw this, and I told Karen, I said, okay, so I guess we've exhausted all of the science fiction dystopian novels, and so now we're going to go for the James Bond stuff, Golden Eye, you know?
	Of course, Golden Eye was not a guy with a golden eye, but that was actually in Fleming's, what he called his estate in Jamaica.
	And the movie was really, though, about something like what Alex Karp was talking about.
	A satellite that was going to be able to spy on everybody and everything, and if it determined that you were a threat, it could use EMP to shut everything down.
	That's exactly what these types of people want to do.
	That was 30 years ago.
	But yeah, no, this GoldenEye is about gold laser goggles and a camera.
	A combination that could one day be used to restore vision in people who have retinal damage, according to the researchers.
	A new study published in the journal called ACS Nano.
	It's a nanotech journal.
	The team found that injecting gold nanoparticles into the eyes of mice with retinal disorders helped to stimulate the rodent's visual system and bring back some vision.
	when targeted with infrared lasers the microscopic gold pieces reproduced electrical signals some are those emitted by cells in the retina that are essential to eyesight but they get damaged by conditions
	like macular degeneration which affects some 20 million americans they said this is a kind of retinal prosthesis to restore vision now i
	Now, when I look at it, I don't know if this is going to work.
	And they said, well, you know, it may work, it may not.
	But it's another example of the foolishness of people like Harari, who don't see how incredibly complex the eye is.
	You know, even Charles Darwin, who basically didn't have anything except his naked eye and his imagination to do science with.
	I mean, he did have like a little hand magnifying glass and his personal effects there.
	It was all philosophy and no science that he had.
	But even he.
	He said the eye was something that was the biggest problem with his theory.
	Because there he understood the complexity of the eye.
	How it can react to light and how it can focus quickly and so forth.
	And it's like, how does that happen by chance?
	He was naive enough to think, when he would see a stagnant glass of water, that the water was spontaneously generating life.
	He didn't understand what was happening with it.
	And he couldn't see it either.
	But when it came to the human eye, or an animal's eye, how in the world does something that complicated work?
	And he had no idea just how complicated it was.
	Here's how complicated it is, and just the part that they are trying to operate with.
	You have photoreceptors in your retina.
	They come in two different types of cells, rods and cones.
	And the difference is that the cones, Well, are very sensitive to color and visual acuity, whereas the rods work better in low light, and they track movement better.
	This is something that I probably would not have remembered this as well, except that I was bullied by a science teacher that I had over this particular topic.
	I might have mentioned it before.
	She...
	She had the advanced science classes in the 7th and 8th grade, and she had a microphone system that she set up.
	The only teacher I've ever known that had anything like that, a little PA system that she had set up.
	So she could scream at kids.
	I mean, it was amazing how she tried to dominate people.
	She's on a little power trip, like a lot of teachers get.
	And, you know, the very beginning of this adventure with her, I had her for two years, and then I was done with science at that point.
	Up to that point, My sister was in college, and I used to read her college textbooks, but I, you know, so that got me into that class, unfortunately, and then they killed my interest in it.
	But she asked one day, she said, so, you know, why do nocturnal animals, you know, why do we have nocturnal animals, or why do they see at night, or something to that effect?
	And I answered, and I said, well, they have...
	More rods than they do cones, and that lets them, you know, see movement and low light and everything.
	She goes, what are you talking about?
	Rods and cones and everything.
	She did her best to humiliate me, and as a kid who was, say, how old would I have been?
	About 12 years old.
	She did a pretty good job of humiliating me in front of everybody, and I was right about that.
	And her answer was, well, you know, because they're nocturnal animals because they go out at night.
	That was the answer she was looking for.
	I gave her the answer about rods and cones.
	And so here we are.
	Okay, so you've got the rods and cones.
	When light falls on them, the cones and the rods zap little electrical pulses that are sent to bipolar and ganglion cells, which process the signals before they're beamed to the brains.
	Now, think about that in terms of the design of God.
	Think about God as the designer, creator of something this complicated.
	And also specialized.
	It's going to give one type of cell more to nocturnal animals and another type of cell to humans and that type of thing.
	And by the way, that's one of the reasons why when you are out in low light conditions, you see better if you don't look directly at the thing you're trying to see.
	You look off to the side a little bit because you've got rods in your periphery of your retina.
	Cones are straight on.
	That's where you're going to see the color and the detail.
	Anyway, but think about how complicated that is.
	You've got rods and cones, different types of cells, and they respond when the light hits them with electrical signals, and those electrical signals are then transmitted to the brain, which creates an image out of that.
	You want to tell me that that all happened by accident?
	There's no way that that happened by accident.
	So, how does this come in?
	Well, they put these gold nanoparticles in.
	And they found that if they focused infrared light onto these gold nanoparticles, they would generate heat that would then stimulate the bipolar and ganglion cells just like photoreceptors were.
	And again, sends the thing out.
	They said it reproduces electrical signals similar to those that would be produced by the organic living cells that are constantly being changed, by the way.
	You know, there are certain supplements that you can take that will help you with macular degeneration because, excuse me, your retina is constantly having to replace those cells.
	They're under a lot of stress, and so there's particular types of nutrition that help a great deal with that.
	Nanoparticles can stay in the retina for months.
	With no major toxicity.
	Well, that's an interesting qualifier.
	No major toxicity?
	And we're talking about gold here, right?
	Gold typically doesn't interact with anything.
	You can swallow gold.
	I remember National Geographic had a thing where it was this decadent thing.
	People would buy this super expensive dessert that had gold leaf on it.
	And it's so thin, they could actually eat it, but they'd just pass it through because it doesn't interact with you at all.
	But with this, gold nanoparticles know major toxicity.
	I can't wait for the horrifying cyberpunk future where people are having their eyeballs harvested on the street.
	Yeah, and they're gold.
	You look deep inside somebody's eye and you see gold in there.
	I guess that could be like a punk thing, you know, like a rapper thing.
	The gold teeth, you'd have gold eyes right there.
	By the way, when speaking of teeth, they got scientists working on growing teeth in the lab.
	A game changer for dentists, rather than creating these, you know, structures and all the rest of the stuff and hobbling this stuff together.
	Well, just regrow the tooth.
	Or grow it in sight, right there where the cavity is.
	You just grow more tooth.
	Or what you could do is you could grow a complete replacement as an implant outside of the body and then put it in.
	That's what they're talking about.
	They said they've got a new type of material.
	Listen to this, because this is also an amazing look at the world that God has created that we live in.
	It enables cells to communicate with one another.
	Essentially allowing one cell to tell another to differentiate itself into new tooth cells.
	Okay, so I've got these cells.
	I'm assuming they're like stem cells or something.
	And so, you know, there's some kind of a signaling thing there that tells the cells to grow into a tooth.
	Okay, now, follow me on this.
	In the beginning was the word logos, logos.
	A system that holds, logos is not just the word.
	It is a comprehensive reference to organization and to intelligence and that type of thing, right?
	And so when you stop and think about this, okay, these guys, they found that there's some way that they can signal cells to grow.
	Well, who is running the signal system that tells ourselves to grow in the first place?
	The Bible tells us that God knit us together in our mother's womb.
	Is that the word?
	Is that the intelligence?
	Is that the design that is there?
	They said, we developed this material in collaboration with the Imperial College of London.
	It's like, okay, keep that stuff out of my mouth.
	These are the people who...
	Gave the simulation about the COVID thing, the Imperial College of London.
	And, of course, that wasn't their first rodeo of fake news either.
	Neil Ferguson and those people, they've had just one after the other.
	So, anyway, they said, this means that when we introduced the cultured cells, they were able to send signals to each other to start the tooth formation process.
	Now, you know, when you look at quantum mechanics and things like that, people who have looked at it famously said, well, if you think you understand it, you don't, you know.
	It is incomprehensible.
	They will signal, you know, these different quantum particles, seem like they are signaling each other from a distance, operating in conjunction.
	It defines all logic and all rules that we see.
	In the normal physical world.
	And now you see that these teeth are growing with signals.
	They think signals are coming from other teeth.
	Well, how do the teeth know how to tell the other teeth what this signal is?
	We could transplant the young tooth cells at the location of the missing tooth.
	Let them grow inside the mouth.
	Alternatively, we could create the whole tooth in the lab and then put it in the patient's mouth.
	Well, you know, when we...
	When we look at all of this, you know, we're told that Christ holds everything together.
	Not only is he the word, the logos, that was in the beginning, that all things were created through him, and that he holds all things together, that he created all things, all things in nature.
	And not only that, he created...
	Powers and dominions and kingdoms and all the rest of this stuff.
	Both the kinds that we see in this world and those that we don't see.
	And he holds it together.
	Holds it together by the power of his word.
	Well, I don't know where these people are coming from, but that's where I'm coming from.
	And when we look at Eli Lilly, the company that...
	Trump went to for his HHS head for the four years to run all this scam.
	Eli Lilly has a new weight loss drug.
	They've got a word for it.
	They were laughing about this on Futurism.
	They said the worst name in the history of the pharmaceutical industry.
	And, of course, they've had some really bad names.
	This one, they said it was licensed to Eli Lilly in 2018.
	Of course, that was when Alex Azar, their CEO, was running HHS for Trump.
	So they got it licensed.
	And this thing is, I said, well, the way you pronounce this, I guess, would be or fugly prawn.
	Or fugly prawn.
	It's a weight loss thing.
	It's, well, sounds like they're just trying to say it's for fugly people, people who are prone to be fugly.
	You know, fat and ugly or whatever.
	I don't know.
	It's crazy.
	But it's another one of these things like Ozempic.
	And, of course, it uses this semiglutide stuff as well.
	Both Eli Lilly and Pfizer are putting this stuff in pill form, because right now you get it as injections, evidently, only.
	But, of course, it's literally poison.
	Poison from a gill monster.
	And, as you might expect, when people use this over a period of time, it starts to kill organs in their body.
	And, so...
	There's something much worse about this than the name.
	The name is crazy.
	And they point out, they said, so why do they come up with such crazy names?
	And of course, they'll always come up with two names.
	They'll come up with a generic name, and then they'll have a brand name.
	So they said, the brand name, I'm sure, will be something that would be much better.
	But they always come up with these names that, first of all, they want them to sound very different from each other because they don't want...
	There to be some confusion when they're being prescribed or filled, or the prescription's being filled.
	But these names sometimes will have a hint as to what is in them.
	Sometimes it's just, you know, pulling out of the thin air, and they've always got two shots at naming it.
	So the medication is a glucagon-like peptide.
	Glucagon, I guess, is the thing.
	That's, you know, this poison.
	And so they have another one that is in competition with it from Pfizer.
	A once-a-day weight management pill.
	Take your skinny pill once a day.
	Unfortunately, the Pfizer one ran into some problems.
	It caused liver injury.
	As you would imagine, again, you're taking monster poison, literally taking that.
	Eli Lilly appears to have had more success because, of course, they had their CEO there as Trump's HHS.
	I'm sure that they were, you know, free to do anything.
	FDA.
	Before we take a break on Rumble, Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	That's very kind.
	Says, last week was weird, not tuning into your show.
	Crazy week at the office, but I'm still here.
	Well, that's great.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	A great independent radio online station.
	Rumble.
	I'm Marty.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	He says, check your email.
	Well, thank you, Marty.
	I appreciate that.
	On kick, Knights of the Storm said, we also have a medical-industrial complex.
	That's right.
	Between the military and the medical, we are being fleeced of all wealth.
	Let's not forget the green grift.
	Yeah, that's one of the key reasons it's there.
	Knights of the Storm, by the way, Knights of the Storm, you can find their website.
	And they have great programs there of their own, and they're kind enough to put a lot of people's programs there.
	So you can find other people as well at Nights of the Storm.
	They said, I had an extensive conversation with AI about climate change.
	It kept spitting out talking points about human-caused global warming.
	I then said I wanted it warmer, so how can I speed it up?
	It then said, there's nothing humans can do.
	That's great.
	That's great.
	Too bad.
	You have to let the AI do it, I guess.
	AI is working on it now.
	They've got those massive data centers.
	If anything's going to warm up the planet, it would be them.
	And when they talk about warming, it's okay, because it's nuclear.
	So that doesn't count, right?
	On Rumble.
	Jerry Alitalo says, given the Mount Everest-sized body of accumulated evidence proving COVID fraud and mass murder criminality, what logically explains there being thus far zero arrests?
	Yeah, massive corruption, isn't it?
	And of course, now they've got this story that's being sold by everybody.
	You know, it's a bioweapon created in the Wuhan lab, released either accidentally or deliberately.
	Well, no, we know that's not the case.
	If that is the case, if that is the case, they put something out that is not dangerous at all.
	But they haven't proven it because they haven't isolated it.
	This is the thing.
	When somebody sells you that, and I don't care who it is that's selling you that, it may be some Maha shill, it may be some alternative media shill, it could be the CIA that's now pushing this.
	Nonsense.
	And the Trump administration's got a website about it.
	When somebody puts that out, just remember, they never isolated the virus.
	So don't talk to me about special features if you've never isolated the virus.
	Don't talk to me about how it's got man-made fur and cleavages and everything.
	You haven't isolated the virus, number one.
	And we have hundreds of places, thanks to Christine Massey's research, more than 200 places she contacted and said, have you isolated this?
	Nobody had.
	Nobody had.
	And so many of them came back and said, we never do that with a virus.
	That it caused her to question the existence of viruses and took her down that path where she discovered that they don't have any scientific proof for viruses.
	They don't have any scientific proof that this thing was created in the lab.
	They don't have any scientific proof that there are viruses.
	So when these people are selling you this nonsense, first of all, you don't even have to get to that level of it.
	You can just...
	Look at when the excess deaths occurred.
	We had a slight increase in excess deaths because of what they were doing in the hospitals.
	Medical care that was killing people.
	Medical care that's being denied to people.
	But then the spike came when the mRNA vaccine went out.
	That is your bioweapon.
	And all this talk about it coming out of the lab is just an excuse to get them off the hook.
	And that's what this is really about.
	Geesebusters, good to see you.
	He said, They killed my father five years ago tonight.
	I'm so sorry.
	Locking the door on us, I'll never forget or forgive those scumbags.
	That's the picture I had.
	I don't have it in the deck today.
	You know, these people.
	So sorry.
	You know, he's gone.
	And masks on and gloves and this written stuff.
	You can't come in.
	That type of thing.
	And that is what Scott Shera is working on right now.
	You know, for his own good and for everybody's good.
	I hope he is successful.
	That court case is coming up.
	You can follow that at OurAmazingGrace.net.
	They did that to his daughter as well.
	So sorry.
	On Rumble, G. Talent, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	Thank you for the kind words.
	On Rumble, Nights of the Storm, thank you as well.
	Great tie and backdrop combo today, Karen.
	Yes, thank you.
	I can't take any credit for that.
	She does all that.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	you you
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alright, so scientists say the Big Bang Theory is wrong.
	But now they know how the world really began, according to the Daily Mail.
	Well, no, they don't.
	They still don't have a clue.
	And again, the term Big Bang was a term of derision by Fred Hoyle, who was poking fun at it, and the people who were pushing it.
	Liked the name, and they adopted it, much to his consternation.
	But he came up with his own theory, which is also, Bunk, steady state universe.
	Let's see, there's a problem for both of them.
	First of all, there has to be some kind of a discontinuity, because something changed.
	The world couldn't constantly be going along the way that it was.
	We have that stubborn...
	Second law of thermodynamics, it says that entropy increases.
	Everything is unraveling and disintegrating and becoming more and more disorganized and cooling off and all the rest of this stuff.
	So what was it that changed that?
	And of course, that's a big problem with the Big Bang as well.
	Who lit the fire?
	Who caused it to blow up or what caused it to blow up?
	There's some kind of a discontinuity.
	So it isn't a steady state thing, right?
	And so when he says steady state universe, he's in...
	Violation of thermodynamics, which is the only thing that we can, you know, second law, which is the only thing that we can observe now.
	So if you are telling me that you've got some theory for the origin of the universe, which both the Big Bang and the steady state universe are theories of it being created.
	If you've got some theory that involves something that you can't observe, now you're not talking about science anymore, are you?
	You're talking about faith.
	faith and so they said despite its prominence the big bang theory is challenged by new investigations into concepts like dark matter and dark energy which
	particles science scientists
	There's the operative word, believe.
	It's faith.
	And it is a blind faith.
	It is a blind faith in their theory.
	They think that, you know, for their theory to work, they have to invent something Some particle that they have not been able to observe.
	So we're not talking about science anymore.
	You know, we're talking about somebody saying, well, you know, it's a tornado in a junkyard that built that building.
	Or you left your window open and the wind came through and rather than creating even more disorder on the papers on your desk, what it did was it sorted them by category and put them in alphabetical order.
	Oh, okay.
	The wind did that, right?
	Yeah, that's what these theories are really about when they say there's no intelligence there.
	The Big Bang model cannot work without the presence of these elusive particles.
	Dark matter, dark energy, says the Daily Mail.
	But so far, scientists have not been able to prove that they exist.
	They're elusive.
	Elusive.
	No, they're imaginary.
	They're not elusive.
	They're imaginary.
	And again, it is faith.
	That has to put this together.
	According to Big Bang Theory, dark matter is the invisible scaffolding that holds all the structure of the cosmos in place, while dark energy is the undetectable force that is pushing the universe to expand faster and faster.
	Unless we assume that these mysterious substances exist, this theory begins to fall apart.
	So you make an assumption.
	You make an assumption in order to prove a theory instead of having a theory that's based on observation, instead of having a theory that can be observed by other people and reproduced by other people.
	And you've got a theory that doesn't obey any known rules of physics.
	So you've got imaginary substances, a complete removal of all known laws of physics.
	And why are they laws, by the way?
	You know, why is everything so reproducible in reality, you know, when we look at it?
	Yeah.
	No, like I said before, you know, Colossians 1, 6, the Bible tells us in him all things hold together.
	You don't need to have dark matter.
	It said without dark matter, the early universe wouldn't have had enough gravitational pull.
	For galaxies and galaxy clusters to form so soon, after the Big Bang, as modern observations suggest that they did.
	No, in him, all things, all together.
	In the beginning, the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
	Logos pulled this stuff together.
	All things visible and invisible, thrones, rulers, powers, authorities, all these were created through him and for him.
	He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.
	Not dark matter.
	Not dark energy.
	But the light.
	They said dark energy is needed to explain why observations show the universe's expansion rate is increasing.
	Assuming these pulling and pushing forces exist is essential to making the Big Bang Theory match what we actually see in the universe.
	It still doesn't work.
	Because still, you don't have any explanation for the intelligence that is necessary for all of this.
	Social media can negatively impact your mental health.
	Learn how to protect yourself.
	An article from exposainews.com, actually it's from Dr. Mercola.
	Online interactions confuse self-perception, trigger or amplify delusional thinking, especially...
	And those who are already at risk for psychosis.
	Well, you want to see real psychosis?
	Take a look at the public schools.
	We're going to take a look at that in just a moment here.
	But as he points out in his article, he says, think about your last social media session.
	Did you walk away feeling happy and connected?
	Or did you walk away feeling anxious, jealous, or drained?
	So he said, this isn't about living in a bubble.
	It's about protecting your peace.
	And, you know, that is one of the key things.
	People are just looking in the wrong place, looking in all the wrong places.
	What was that?
	That was Gilly.
	Looking for love in all the wrong places.
	That was real popular when Karen and I moved to Houston in 1980.
	People are looking for love in all the wrong places.
	Looking for love in all the wrong faces.
	Now, just listen to God, right?
	He says, as the rain and the snow falls down from the heaven, waters the earth in seed, so the word of my mouth will do what I purpose.
	He says, you will go out in joy, and you will be led in peace.
	It's a very different experience than social media.
	Very different indeed, right?
	So, when we look at what...
	People are getting.
	It's not just social media that is the bane of our existence.
	You know, for the longest time I have referred, and many times I have referred to our government schools, our so-called public schools, as seminaries for Satan.
	Never has that been more true.
	This is an event that was recorded just before the election.
	And it's some mothers, and this is a mother and a daughter, Talking about how the school had such a profound and immediate effect on her teenage daughter, who had been homeschooled prior to that,
	when she put this child in the government school, the public school, the seminary of Satan, depending on how you view this thing.
	And it truly is amazing how they came after her.
	You know, when you talk about social media, And how it has that huge effect on you.
	Just think about the effect that these seminaries of Satan have on these kids.
	My story is about my daughter who was socially transitioned at her public school.
	Having been a homeschooling mother for over a decade, I was forced to put my children in public school due to having financial issues and having to go back to work full time.
	While homeschooling, my daughters were your typical preteen girls.
	They were confident, secure, just your typical girly girls.
	Within a year of them being in public school, I started slowly seeing the impact of what was really being done behind closed doors.
	Both my daughters were riddled with anxiety, couldn't sleep, started self-harming, and struggling with suicidal thoughts.
	I particularly noticed my oldest daughter Penny.
	Doing different things like talking in a lower-toned voice, dressing more masculine, wearing tight sports bras, wearing boys' boxers, and cutting her long hair off.
	I started noticing pronoun pins on her backpack, books I didn't buy show up in her room that were transgender-focused.
	And her art taking a very dark turn with satanic and witchcraft symbols.
	When I would inquire about these things, she would shut down and go quiet.
	She became very disconnected from me, and she would often tell me that I just didn't understand her anymore.
	This disconnect I have now learned is by design.
	I found myself going from having a close relationship with my daughter to watching her slowly pretend to be a boy and get dangerously depressed and completely shut off from me.
	After refusing to let her have transgender pride flags at my house or to affirm the transgender narrative, she chose to live full-time with her dad, who was affirming her.
	I felt I had lost my daughter.
	I prayed and was resolved to stand on the truth.
	After some time, and what I believe was a miracle, she wanted to start coming back to my house and also ask to homeschool again.
	Within months of her being out of the public school, her anxiety, self-harm, and depression started to slowly subside.
	And by the grace of God, this past year, she gave her life to Jesus.
	She's learning her true identity in Him and is learning to accept exactly who God created her to be, which is a beautiful young girl.
	It continues to be a fight of rewiring her thinking where lies have crept in.
	Many of the stories she's going to share with you, even here today, I have only even recently found out about as even preparing for this speech.
	We are still on a journey of healing, and it is truly a detox from what's socially going on in the public school doctrine.
	If there is one thing I could tell parents, it is to never affirm your child in the lie of transgenderism.
	Tell your child the truth, because it is the most loving thing you can do when they are confused and believing lies.
	Now you can hear from Penny.
	Thank you, Karen.
	Thank you.
	My confusion about my gender and sexuality began my first day of middle school, 6th grade.
	The first friend I had made told me she was bisexual and shared with me her sexual experiences with another school bathroom.
	This information confused and shocked me as it was such adult content being shared with me.
	Later in another class, I was asked to fill out an About Me worksheet that asked my pronouns and a name I preferred.
	Which again, confused me because I had never heard such concepts until then.
	By the seventh grade, I had chose Penn as my preferred name and began binding my chest to appear flatter.
	My teachers would call me by this name in class, and upon my request, kept this a secret from my parents, calling me one name in the classroom and another name in front of them.
	My teachers not only supported me in this, but they also encouraged it, going as far as recommending me gay pornographic books and taking the whole...
	Taking the role as my affirming caretaker.
	In the eighth grade, I had fully identified as gender fluid, going back and forth through pronouns depending on the day.
	In that year, I also began cutting myself, leaning towards suicide as comfort, and would have seasons of depressive episodes.
	In the ninth grade, I had fully developed an anxiety disorder, making sleep an almost non-existent thing.
	And these tendencies were common among my friends, since we were all suffering the same things and would apply to each other's coping mechanisms.
	All of this happened during the vulnerable stages of my parents' divorce, which made me a very easy target when searching for somewhere to belong.
	Entering 10th grade, I decided to switch to homeschooling due to my mental health declining significantly and me wanting to get better.
	As I spent more time at home, away from the heavy influences of school teachers and friends, my mental health slowly but surely began to improve.
	It wasn't until this year, though, my 11th grade year, I had met Jesus.
	I began to get more involved in the church.
	Due to the solitude of homeschooling, I had not only found healing in the community that I had found, but I had realized how deep and dark the pit I was in.
	I'm still a work in progress, but I've never had such a better hope for the future than I do now.
	For a young woman at this age...
	Isn't that amazing?
	And you know, they will tell you exactly the opposite.
	There was a piece on the Drudge Report.
	Belief in Satan and hell is linked to greater stress.
	Now, only if you oppose those things.
	If you embrace them, oh, then everything is great.
	If you embrace New Age religion and the occult and everything, oh, you don't have any stress at all in your life.
	Well, you know, that may be true.
	It may be true.
	We're in a war, right?
	We're in a spiritual war.
	But you look at the reality.
	You know, they're always telling you, we've got to use their pronouns or anything because otherwise they're going to be suicidal.
	That was what was driving her, suicidal.
	She began cutting herself.
	She had severe depression, severe anxiety because of what they were pushing on her.
	I'm telling you, you know, it's...
	It's not an exaggeration to say that they are seminaries of Satan.
	And there isn't any rule or regulation that some president or governor or public school board or even a principal is going to do that's going to stop that if there is some teacher who is over your children who has that kind of agenda.
	And how do you know?
	How do you know who they are?
	And why are we paying taxes for this?
	Why have they sucked that money out of us to pay for these abhorrent systems here?
	If you're into crystals and psychic powers are predicting the future, your stress levels probably aren't affected at all, says this study out of England that was pushed and promoted by the Drudge Report and other mainstream media people.
	Just because they did a study doesn't mean that it's true, right?
	Just like you run these pharmaceutical studies, guess what?
	You've got three different drug companies that have the same drug for the same condition.
	Well, brand A runs a study and they'll tell you they're by far and away better than brand B or brand C. Then when brand B does a study, they're better than brand A or brand C. You get the idea.
	It's whoever funds a study.
	They don't tell you who funded this.
	They don't tell you how they focus on this.
	But they did make an interesting thing here.
	They said that...
	Traditional paranormal beliefs, like the devil and hell and witchcraft and stuff like that, that operates at a societal level.
	But the second category, New Age philosophy, things like mind reading and contacting spirits and predicting future events, that operates on an individual level.
	No, they're both individual.
	One is not societal and the other one individual.
	And these studies...
	Or not objective truth.
	Although, just like, you know, earlier in the program, we talked about the artificial intelligence that is going to give you financial advice, but it can't even add.
	Can't even add.
	And so you've got these people who are going to tell you how the universe started, how it operates.
	They can't even add.
	They can't even add numbers.
	And then the people who are going to tell you what is good for your children and all the rest of the stuff, they absolutely don't know what they're talking about.
	But just like artificial intelligence, they are very confident, very, very confident and cocky about what they're telling you, even though it is absolutely false.
	Don't ever be taken in by these people.
	And I think it's one of the big benefits of what happened to us five years ago.
	Fauci was the epitome of arrogance, propaganda, lies, and all the rest of this stuff.
	And people can see that.
	And we can always go back and we can point to Fauci.
	And we can talk about how somebody can be so cocksure about everything.
	I am the authority and having absolutely feeling no compunction to have to prove or anything or show you any data, but just pronounce it that way.
	So, all the observations that we have, people like that child there, parents that we see, individuals that we see, the people who have a solid relationship with their family, with their God,
	they're the ones who are upset with this stuff?
	No, actually.
	And I would say that maybe there are some people out there that they interviewed that believe That there's a devil, believe that there's hell, believe that there's a God, but they haven't come to terms with God.
	And, you know, the devils believe, and they tremble, right?
	Maybe their problem is that they haven't really come to terms with the right supernatural entity, so to speak, right?
	How do we determine that?
	Well, you test the spirits and see where they're from.
	And you have an unchanging standard for that.
	It's the Bible.
	So instead of worrying about bad luck and curses or devilish influence, remember those beliefs themselves might be adding to your stress.
	So that's the advice of this study here.
	If you can't beat them, join them.
	Join the supernatural forces.
	Get into witchcraft and New Age stuff.
	And you won't have to worry about any of that stuff because Satan will leave you alone if you are...
	Already voluntarily enlisting in his schools and his system.
	That same mother said that she went back to the city council meeting after they tried to mess with her daughter.
	And this was in Ventura County, the city council meeting on March the 18th.
	She took the platform to speak out against the proposed Community, autonomy, rights, and equality.
	That spells out care.
	Isn't that nice?
	But notice that it's all about community first.
	Government schools, government health.
	So the city of Ventura has a new policy, a new city statute that says that law enforcement agencies will not participate in the enforcement of any federal or state laws, they don't have to worry about state laws in California doing this, that would criminalize Abortion,
	child mutilation, or child sterilization.
	You can't have law enforcement doing anything to Planned Parenthood because that's their bailiwick right there.
	So when the mother that you just saw there was talking, she is actually a marketing manager for an organization known as Moms for America.
	That was where she was speaking.
	When she went to the podium, she began by saying, I'm a mother of six.
	And the Ventura County Public Schools socially transitioned my daughter without my consent.
	She was constantly facing interruptions from dissenters shouting, lies, lies, lies!
	Well, they make it very clear.
	I mean, we just had the court case that is still, I think, before the Supreme Court.
	I talked about it last week.
	Where they said, well, no, we're going to do this curriculum.
	We're going to show...
	Pornography, homosexual pornography to your kids and try to transition them.
	But you can opt out.
	And then within just a couple of months of putting that out, they said, no, we're not going to let you opt out.
	I guess everybody was trying to opt out of it.
	Anyway, she said, she pressed on.
	She said, I'm here today to offer nothing but prayer.
	And I want to lift up my Father in heaven.
	Father God, I just want to come to you in Jesus' name, she said.
	I pray, Father, that you would tear down the strongholds in this place.
	I pray, Father, that you would raise up the men in this room.
	By this point, she was facing intense boos, and she was attempting to finish her prayer.
	The Ventura mayor, Jeanette Sanchez Palacios, interrupted her and said, We don't do prayer.
	Finish your comments.
	She said, I do pray all of this in the name of Jesus, the Son, the Father, and the Holy Spirit.
	Jesus is the King of kings, Lord of lords.
	And she said she didn't initially plan to pray until she got up to the platform.
	And then that's what she felt called to do.
	And so the men, should the men rise up?
	In what way should the men rise up?
	It's very concerning, as I said before, when we look at Elon Musk and his model of fatherhood, He points out the fundamental injustice of Elon Musk's model of fatherhood.
	I remember a few years ago, I said, this guy, he wants to talk about the importance of having kids and everything.
	I said, he doesn't even have, he's not even a father.
	Somebody said, oh no, he is, he's got a lot of kids.
	I said, no, no, no, no.
	I was surprised, as a matter of fact.
	I said, okay, well then, I take it back.
	But he's still not a father.
	He's a sperm donor.
	Elon Musk is a sperm donor.
	He's currently unmarried.
	He has fathered at least 14 children by at least four different women.
	Why is he doing this?
	Well, he's taken it upon himself because he is so smart that we need more people like him.
	And, of course, we know he's smart because he's rich, right?
	Richest man that ever lived, therefore he must be the smartest man that ever lived, according to the logic of Fiddler on the Roof, where Tevye says, you know, every day, if I was a rich man, if I were a rich man, you know, I'd sit every day in the gate and everybody would come and listen, and no matter what I would say,
	they would think I really know because I'm rich.
	That's the way it is with Elon Musk.
	I think he's even fooled himself.
	I think he's even been lifted up in his pride.
	Well, if I am the richest man that ever lived, I must be the wisest man that ever lived as well.
	Musk has taken it upon himself to father as many children as possible with high intelligence.
	Even arguing that babies should be born via cesarean session to allow for larger brains.
	That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
	First of all, One of the wonders of creation is the fact that you can have single cell bacteria that can learn that there's a poison in the water and they can work out a way around it.
	How do they do that?
	How do they do that?
	How big a brain does it take to do that?
	Maybe there's something else that's going on here.
	Quite frankly, the size of your brain doesn't necessarily have anything to do with your intelligence, first of all.
	Secondly, just doing cesarean sessions all the time isn't going to make brains bigger.
	What does this guy believe in?
	Lamarckian inheritance?
	That was the thing where they said, well, we're going to draft so they want to have a longer neck so they can reach that fruit up there.
	So they keep thinking about it, right?
	And as they think about it, each subsequent generation gets longer and longer necks because they're thinking about it or something.
	Well, that was...
	Disproven pretty quickly.
	They took some mice and they cut the tails off, right?
	Also, I just want to say, it shows a remarkable callous disregard for women, just to be like, oh, all babies should just be cesarean-ed out.
	It takes a long time to recover from that.
	It is not comfortable.
	It's quite painful from what I've heard.
	Oh, yeah.
	No, he doesn't care.
	He doesn't care.
	You know, getting back to this Lamarckian inheritance thing, they said, well, you know, we'll cut the tails off these mice.
	They weren't three blind mice, I guess.
	But, you know, they said, well, if we cut the tails off, if Lamarckian inheritance is true, then the subsequent generations ought to be born with at least shorter tails.
	Didn't make any difference.
	And it isn't going to make any difference with cesareans either.
	You know, you cut up the mother, that's not going to make the kids smarter.
	Where did he even get some nonsense idea like that?
	It's probably from the French Bulldogs, right?
	French bulldogs, they bred them to have really large skulls.
	French bulldogs known for their intelligence, yeah.
	That's where I was going.
	That's where I was going, yeah.
	It was like, they're not the border collies of the canine world, by a long shot.
	They have large heads.
	But it's such large heads that they have to be delivered by a cesarean session.
	And so through genetics, we've been able to create mutants.
	But not intelligence that's there.
	So he has pro-natalist views.
	And just understand, and this is why I mention this, because we have to make a distinction between pro-natalist views and pro-family views.
	That's a big difference.
	You know, Trump is talking about, oh, let's pay people to have kids.
	That's not a pro-family view, right?
	You're still a pro-family view.
	Appealing to people's desire for money, not necessarily for children.
	Perhaps that's why they're doing it.
	Because if they pay people to have children, then those people, maybe instead of getting focused on the family, maybe they will still be focused on their fortune and turn their kids over to the government to raise, and the government can have its way with them.
	You know, that kind of child trafficking.
	It's worked out so well for these people that use children to gain welfare, and they just continue to have more and more children.
	We see how well they're taken care of.
	That's right.
	Well, nothing will make you happier than having kids, said Elon Musk.
	Just so long as you don't have to spend any time with them, or do anything with them, or play with them.
	Just have the kids.
	That's the main point.
	Don't do anything with the kid.
	That's right.
	Yeah, I wonder, you know, being an absentee father, Travis, for that child that he had that became trans, right?
	He and that child are at loggerheads with each other.
	I don't know if that kid's making him happier.
	I don't think it is.
	I think if you abandon your kids and let other strangers raise them, those kids are not going to make you happy.
	He thinks that propagation of children is primarily a means to an end.
	The children of advanced intelligence must be sired in order to save humanity.
	He's a eugenist, right?
	Eugenicist.
	A eugenist.
	Now, he's a eugenicist.
	Yeah, God doesn't hold this kind of view of humanity.
	We derive our dignity, something that Yuval Harari would deny, we derive our dignity not from being useful, right?
	And so we go down that route.
	What is that a route to?
	That's a route to eugenics and euthanasia.
	Oh, good genes and good death.
	That's what those two things are about.
	If the only thing that gives you worth is your contribution to society, what is that worth?
	That is worthless.
	We derive our dignity that they want to deny.
	They want to deny our freedom and our dignity.
	We derive that.
	And the fact that our Heavenly Father loved us into being, He knit us together in our mother's womb.
	We are not merely products of conception that are geared solely towards continuing our specie.
	We've been given an immortal soul, which has limitless depth and meaning.
	Again, you know, when you look at Scott Sher and his daughter, it's a great sight to go to and look at the tributes that he had and how his family Loved and enjoyed Grace who had Down's Syndrome.
	Now, if we go with Elon Musk's version of it, that's the kind of, well, we want to have intelligent people.
	We don't want to have people with Down's Syndrome, right?
	And we want to have healthy people.
	If you've got a problem, we'll put you down, right?
	If we go with Elon Musk's version, you know, where is the worth of someone like Grace?
	And yet, Scott Sher and his family could see her spirit, her soul, in her.
	They could see the image of God in her, even though she didn't have a great deal of intelligence.
	It was about the love.
	It was not about the intelligence.
	It was not about the money or the love of money.
	It was about the love of children.
	Our Creator is a loving Father who is intimately concerned with the smallest details of our lives.
	Christ told His disciples, Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies?
	Yet one of them, not one of them, is forgotten in God's sight.
	And even the hairs of your head are counted.
	Do not be afraid.
	You are of more value than many sparrows.
	In the same way, all men who become fathers are called to take care of their children in the way that God, our Father, cares for His children.
	A good father intimately knows the unique personalities and attributes of his children so that he can more effectively care for their particular needs, genuinely loving them.
	A father can only achieve this by spending as much quality time with his children as possible in his home.
	And let me just correct that and say that quantity is quality.
	Quantity is quality.
	How do you get to know all the nuances of your child by spending time with them?
	That's always the excuse I hear.
	Well, I don't spend much time with my kids, but boy, when I'm with them, it's great quality time.
	No, it's not.
	It's not because if you don't have enough time with them, you don't have a relationship that's going to have any quality to it.
	Every mother deserves a father of her child to father her child exclusively with her.
	So the child will flourish.
	So she's not forced to become a single mom.
	Every child deserves to be loved by her married mother.
	Unfortunately, Musk and his model of fatherhood does a great injustice to both the mother and the child, as we see with people, the mothers of his children and his children speaking out against him.
	So it's great that he likes kids and he doesn't want to kill them, but does he want to take care of them or does he just want to be a sperm donor because his genes are so superior to everybody else's in his imagination?
	His model of fatherhood is that it is not rooted in what we see.
	He often talks about the importance of reasoning.
	Based on first principles and sound logic, but his model of fatherhood does not appear to take into account what we all know, what social data shows.
	And as Travis was saying, yeah, all this stuff about, you know, fatherless homes and everything.
	That's worked out so well for everybody, hasn't it?
	Well, no, it hasn't.
	Data shows that children from married, intact families have lower rates of depression, anxiety.
	They graduate from college at higher rates.
	That's one of the key things, not just the seminary of Satan.
	It was the divorce that happened in her family.
	And that opened her up to that satanic influence there at that school.
	So, more than anything else, when you look at the benefits that these children have, the children thrive the most when they're raised exclusively by their married father and mother.
	Yeah, it's not intelligence that we need to give to our kids, which we can't give, actually.
	He doesn't have any control over the genetics that are going to be transferred to the child.
	We can't even give that.
	What can we give?
	Well, we can give love and time.
	That's what we can give, and that's evidently what he's not all that interested in doing.
	You know, it's also, the converse is true of this.
	If you take a child that hasn't been loved, And you add intelligence and you add massive sums of money like he's going to be adding to his kids.
	What are you creating?
	You're creating a time bomb.
	It's going to be amazing to see what these children are going to be like that are growing up everywhere without a father to help them.
	And so, you know, what do we do?
	As I said before, you know, when we were talking about social media, don't spend time on social media.
	Spend time...
	Trying to build a relationship with God.
	And what does that look like?
	You know, a lot of people, when they're new, and it's a good thing, good thing to read the Bible, it can sometimes, though, if you get into a Bible reading plan, sometimes that can work against you.
	If you started out at the beginning of the year with maybe a Bible reading plan, you've probably fallen away from it by now.
	And what that can turn into is a...
	A situation where it's all about you're pursuing a relationship based on work, not on love.
	You're not trying to find a relationship with the God of the universe.
	You need to be able to take the time.
	As I said before, when you look at a relationship, it's not just quantity time.
	It's the quantity of time.
	Focusing in and drilling down in a relationship.
	And so from that standpoint, you know, this is the Bible reading plan that changed my spiritual life.
	Well, I'm glad it worked for them, and maybe it'll work for you as well.
	In this particular one, I've seen a lot of different ones.
	Ten chapters a day.
	Every day you'd read five psalms, one proverb.
	Two chapters, right?
	Five chapters of Psalms, and one chapter of Proverbs, and two chapters of the Old Testament, two chapters of the New Testament.
	So it's ten chapters a day.
	I guess that works until you get to Psalm 119.
	Just that one chapter.
	You're going to have to just breeze through that thing.
	You're going to sound like the disclaimer at the end of a pharmaceutical ad in your mind as you're verbalizing the text that you go through.
	No.
	Spend some time and think about what you're reading.
	Spend some time and think about God.
	Seek and knock.
	You'll find it'll be open to you.
	It's not just checking off this This thing, you know, mechanically checking that off.
	It's not about that at all.
	But we're going to take a quick break, and we'll come back.
	I want to just, from a political standpoint, we're going to talk about some tariffs and some financial stuff as well.
	But this Trump's task force to eradicate anti-Christian bias.
	I want to talk a little bit about that when we come back.
	On Rumble, Marky Mark, thank you for the tip.
	He said, I'd be curious to know the reason or reasons why for the divorce.
	Christians divorce more than the world does.
	That's a travesty.
	By the way, that's according to Barna, who you've interviewed on your show.
	Yeah, I know.
	It is amazing.
	And I would say that, you know, George Barna shows over and over again that people who profess to be Christians are You know, fall into the same types of failings.
	You know, sin is when we fall short, right?
	It's like a turn from archery.
	You know, you miss the target.
	Well, sometimes we're not even aiming for the target, so it's pretty hard to hit it, right?
	But even if you are aiming for it, sometimes you don't make it.
	You know, we hear sins and iniquities.
	Iniquity is really kind of rebellion.
	Right?
	It's a difference if you're trying and you miss, and it's a difference if it's rebellion.
	Now, I'm not saying that people try to miss.
	What I am saying is that, you know, it kind of goes back to what I was talking about with that study.
	They said, you know, the people who are in all kinds of witchcraft and tarot card reading and, you know, going to mediums and all this other kind of stuff, they have a pretty placid life, and it's like...
	Yeah, you know, the devil kind of leaves them alone because they're already doing everything that he wants for them.
	Christians, on the other hand, if you are a Christian, you're going to be under attack.
	And you're also going to, if you give in to that, one of the things, you know, a lot of people say, well, okay, Christ saves me if I...
	I believe, and I'm saved, and now what do I do?
	Well, maybe he's going to take away my salvation.
	Well, maybe what he's going to do is he's going to take away your rewards, eternal rewards.
	Maybe he's going to hit you with a hammer.
	To get your attention.
	And maybe if he doesn't get your attention, he hits you with a bigger hammer.
	You know, there are consequences for disobedience in this life.
	Christians don't think about that.
	We're so focused on politics and what's going on with Israel and other things like that.
	We really don't talk about spiritual warfare.
	We don't really talk about the consequences in this life and the next of disobedience.
	Even if God forgives us our sins, there are still consequences.
	You know, there are consequences for David, right?
	When David committed adultery and he killed Bathsheba's husband, that he could marry her, well, he had war within his family for the rest of his life.
	God can forgive us, but he doesn't remove the consequences for us.
	Why?
	Because he's a good father.
	You know, a good father is going to have consequences for your disobedience.
	So, you know, in answer to your question, You know, my feeling on all this is, and I see, and I've seen people that I think were sincere Christians that fell, and I think they're under special attack.
	I think fathers especially are under attack because, you know, if you get the head of the household, you got them, you know, you can start tearing everybody apart, as we saw with that family.
	But it doesn't mean that we're not responsible for that.
	And I think a big part of it is that you've got pastors who don't really talk to people about the horrific consequences just in this life, let alone in the next.
	It doesn't mean that somebody is going to lose their salvation, but it means that they're going to lose a lot, a lot, and we underestimate that.
	We look at this in a binary way, and people are up for that kind of stuff.
	I think there's not going to be any consequences that they can't handle.
	So a lot of it is bad theology and not good teaching, and it's our human nature.
	If you're careless and you really are not interested in feeding yourself your daily bread, right?
	Christ is the bread of life.
	We don't listen to him on a daily basis.
	We're feeding a different part of our nature.
	That nature is going to get stronger, and the other nature is going to get weaker.
	On Rumble, solo board gaming night.
	It says, I started reading the word of God to get to know him.
	What an amazing experience it has been.
	Started with the New Testament, thinking that was all I needed, and now I'm in Judges.
	Can't get enough.
	Yes, that is so true.
	It's interesting to see a lot of celebrities saying that now.
	Yeah, people who grew up in and around a church or whatever.
	But they never picked up the Bible, never read it.
	And they're like, whoa, I can't believe this, how astounding this is.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, I want to talk a little bit about this task force about anti-Christian bias.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	you
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	Karen just came in and said, I'm Marty.
	We'll be doing matching funds across all platforms tomorrow.
	I said you can mention it today to prime the pump.
	So thank you, Marty.
	I appreciate that.
	That is really, really kind.
	Thank you.
	He's done that before.
	And I really appreciate that.
	We're really behind this month.
	So thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	Let's talk a little bit about this anti-Christian bias task force.
	You know, as this is coming out, the same weekend, we've got J.D. Vance in India.
	Of course, his wife is Indian, but he's there, you know, posing with Modi, who is, you know, the radical Hindu party that is there is out there killing Christians left and right in India.
	Sikhs and Muslims as well.
	So, yeah, you talk about posing, all this stuff.
	What if a Christian believes, though, in just wars?
	And what if a Christian opposes sustained bombing and starvation of civilians?
	Would there be an anti-Christian bias for that kind of Christian belief in the Trump administration?
	You better believe it is.
	You will not criticize a foreign political entity.
	And so if you do that, he's going to come after you.
	And so in this article, they talk about, you know, the Biden administration.
	Yeah, they had...
	Big anti-Christian bias.
	They were coming after people with the FACE Act.
	If you show up at an abortion clinic and you try to peacefully just hold a sign or tell somebody about this to try to get them to not kill children, well, then the Biden administration would SWAT team you and drag you off and send in a SWAT team in front of your family and drag you off to prison and all the rest of this stuff.
	We saw a lot of that.
	We saw...
	Them standing aside while you had radical abortionists doing fire arson as well as graffiti on pro-life counseling clinics and things like that.
	So yeah, there was a tremendous amount of anti-Christian bias under the Biden administration.
	Now, what does it look like under the Trump administration?
	So Biden was coming after anybody who was opposing abortion.
	What does Trump do?
	He comes after anybody who's opposing the bombing of children in Gaza.
	See, they're fundamentally the same.
	They have different constituencies, but neither of them has a problem persecuting.
	Persecuting, politically persecuting people who stand against the mass slaughter of children, of children, let alone adults, as is happening in Gaza.
	The sustained murder of adults.
	What hypocrisy it is for the Trump administration to talk about how they're going to eradicate anti-Christian bias.
	To me, that is a fundamental Christian belief, that we don't take innocent life.
	So, task force members.
	Heard from Michael Ferris, who is a lawyer.
	He's there with the Homeschool Legal Defense Association, a great organization.
	If you're homeschooling, they have been there at the very beginning, fought really hard for our right to homeschool.
	And he was legal counsel for the Cornerstone Church.
	Biden, with his IRS, put it under investigation after accusing the church of violating the Johnson Amendment.
	The Johnson Amendment, enacted in 1954, prohibits non-profit organizations from supporting political candidates.
	Short on details about this.
	They call it the Johnson Amendment to make it sound like it's something that was in the Constitution, right?
	Or that is the law.
	It's not at all.
	Lyndon Johnson was opposed by some churches and was nearly defeated.
	And so he decided that he would use the IRS as a weapon against them.
	And so Lyndon Johnson got the IRS to amend their code.
	We're talking about bureaucratic rules.
	We're not talking about a constitutional amendment here.
	And say that you can't talk about political candidates.
	Now, you can't talk about political candidates if you're conservative.
	If you are a liberal black church, oh, that's celebrated.
	And I think it ought to be allowed.
	But again, it's a two-tier standard that they have held for a very long time.
	But, you know, Biden finally took the bait.
	This is something that about 12 or 13 years ago, I had the Alliance Defending Freedom come in.
	They set up a thing called Pulpit Freedom Sunday to purposely attack the Johnson Amendment and said, you're going to tell us that we can't talk about politics at the pulpit?
	Okay.
	Well, here's a tape where I just did that.
	And they started out in like two or three churches where the pastor said, all right, we'll do that.
	And they sent the tapes to the IRS.
	The IRS did nothing.
	So next year, they've got like a couple of dozen that do it.
	And then they wind up with like 50 of them.
	And then they finally figured out, well, you know, the IRS isn't going to come after us.
	And so they quit.
	They wanted the IRS to come after them.
	They wanted the challenge.
	And so Biden did it.
	That's how authoritarian the guy was.
	He would do stuff that even the radical left wouldn't do under Obama and everything.
	Biden did it.
	And so, you know, when you look at this, people should welcome that challenge.
	You should welcome that as a challenge.
	You know, whenever the law is wrong, we need to challenge it.
	And that's what the Alliance Defending Freedom was trying to do.
	They were trying to provoke a challenge from the IRS so they could shut it down once and for all because the First Amendment is very clear.
	You don't have a gag on your...
	And history shows that as well, right?
	When you look at the Revolutionary War, there were so many pastors who were pushing back against the British because they knew that the British would come.
	If they started exercising this absolute control, they would take away the free exercise of religion, as they had done in Great Britain.
	They knew they would institute that again.
	So you had the pastors across the board, they called them the Black Regiment because they would push against the British government there.
	So that is a long-standing tradition.
	But the Biden Department of Justice aggressively prosecuted them for that.
	They also prosecuted the people for peacefully protesting abortion.
	Now we've got the Trump administration coming after people who are peacefully protesting.
	Mass murder in Gaza and our involvement in it.
	Oh, they need to be punished.
	They need to be kicked out of the country.
	We need to shut down the free exercise of free speech and protest.
	That's the Trump administration's approach.
	Now, what if you're doing that because of your religious beliefs?
	Yeah.
	So the Department of Justice turned a blind eye to a string of violent domestic terror attacks on Christian pro-life pregnancy centers.
	And now you have Trump media turning a blind eye to Trump politically persecuting people who push back against murder when it's done in the context of war, deliberate attacks on civilian population, and then tell you that Trump is standing there for the free exercise of religion.
	Well, that's not my religion.
	The task force is going to eradicate anti-Christian bias, they said.
	This is coming from the guy, this task force is coming from the guy who paid state governments, who paid governors, Republican and Democrat, to lock down churches for the first time in American history.
	That was Trump.
	Trump.
	And the churches, to their shame, did that out of fear.
	But he paid them to do that.
	You talk about anti-Christian bias.
	You're talking about anti-God bias.
	And the Supreme Court underneath him, no different.
	Well, you can open up a casino, but you can't open up a church, right?
	So now he is focused on trans bathrooms, right?
	Even though he was one of the pioneers of the transgender movement, saying, we want to have a tranny in our Miss Universe contest.
	Now he just reinvents himself, no explanation.
	And so now he's on your side, right?
	And now he's on your side to stop the people trying to, you know, Biden wants to come after the people who want to stop the murder of babies, but Trump is on the side of the people who want to murder babies and women and men and civilians,
	on and on.
	There's actually, on Israeli television, there's a televised debate as to whether or not newborn babies in Gaza are innocent or whether or not they should be killed.
	Yeah, actually debating this.
	As I said before, you know, once we depersonize somebody, once we say that it's no longer a person, right?
	That was what was done in Nazi Germany.
	That's been done over and over again.
	That's what's being done in abortion.
	That's what's being done with euthanasia.
	Well, you know, this person, they did have good quality of life, but now they've been injured and they don't have a good quality of life.
	So let's turn off the life support.
	Maybe we can harvest their organs, that type of thing.
	When you take away the fact that somebody is a person, Then you can kill them.
	And so the first thing you have to do is take away their personhood.
	So you had a debate on Israeli television.
	One guy said who was arguing to kill everybody, all the civilians, said there are no innocents in Gaza because everyone is a terrorist.
	See?
	They're terrorists why?
	Well, because he says so.
	Everybody's a terrorist because he says so.
	One person says, do you think the current...
	In response, do you think the current Israeli government is sending the Israeli soldiers to kill babies in Gaza?
	I think that the moment that rabbis talk about how there are no innocents in Gaza, and Smotrich and Ben-Gavir talk about evacuating and thinning out the population so that Gaza will be clear of Arabs that will settle Jews in their stead, that's not a goal of a war of a country that I want to live in.
	And he comes back and says, okay, so we disagree.
	He does want that.
	He does want that.
	Top Israeli rabbis have explicitly said that the Torah demands the killing of Palestinian babies.
	No, actually not.
	I mean, it's the rabbinical writings in the Talmud, but not the Torah.
	Now, they go back and they appeal to the story of Samuel, right?
	And Saul, where Saul was told to kill all the Amalekites.
	And he doesn't.
	Kill them all and kill their animals and so forth.
	And when Samuel comes back, he says, you know, what is this sound that I hear of animals that you haven't killed and so forth.
	And so they come back and...
	He says, Netanyahu has said, you have to remember what Amalek has done to you, says our holy Bible.
	And he quotes it.
	He says, now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have and spare them not.
	But slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
	Well, that wasn't said to him, was it?
	God wasn't talking to him.
	God wasn't talking to Netanyahu.
	That makes about as much sense as you take a passage and somebody's like, go fetch me a pail of water.
	And you use that.
	That is not...
	First of all, you don't have any warrant to claim that these people are Amalek at all, first of all.
	But the most obvious thing is that you have not been given that commandment.
	Not at all.
	I think we need to throw Bibi out with the bathwater, quite frankly.
	You can either have the Bible or you can have Bibi.
	And the thing that is the most galling is that people who are pushing this, like Netanyahu, like Ben Shapiro, don't believe the Bible.
	They admit, no, I don't believe that.
	Except the part where I get to kill everybody and take their land.
	That's the part I believe.
	I don't believe that Moses parted the Red Sea, said Ben Shapiro.
	But I believe that these people are Amalek and I have a warrant to kill them.
	I've got a license to kill.
	What utter nonsense.
	Why are Christians signing on to this?
	As I said last week, there's more Christian Zionists than there are Jews in the world.
	Far more.
	And not all the Jews are Zionists.
	Only half of the ones in Israel support Netanyahu.
	Less than half, actually.
	You had to put a coalition together.
	And so, you have to ask yourself, where in the world do they come up with a warrant?
	To do this.
	Well, they said the troops on the ground were also explicitly encouraged to kill Palestinian babies in the name of wiping out Amalek and erasing the memory of Palestinians.
	These animals, they said, can no longer live.
	You see, they've taken away their humanity, so now they're animals.
	They've labeled them Amalek.
	Well, prove that they are Amalek.
	And then you ask the question, so what is Israel?
	Is Israel an ethnic identity?
	Is it a political identity?
	Is it a religion?
	Because religion hasn't been practiced since 70 AD, since the temple went.
	Is it calls to wipe out Amalek or calls for genocide and a war of extermination?
	Because as Christians, speaking of Christian Zionists, we should understand there is no Jew or Gentile, right?
	There is no difference between slave or free, male or female.
	We're all one in Christ.
	Even all this stuff about different races, right?
	God has made all nations of one blood.
	Yes, there are differences in terms of language, tongues, tribes, that type of thing, and nations.
	And those are differences, absolutely.
	But that doesn't give us the warrant to initiate force and to continue using force Particularly targeting civilian populations when there isn't any possibility of us getting that.
	But I say to the Christians that instead of worrying about whether or not people are in the land of Zion or not, you need to look and worry about whether or not they're in Christ or out of Christ.
	You need to look as to whether or not they're in the kingdom of God or whether or not they're outside of the kingdom of God.
	Christ said over and over again, my kingdom is not of this world.
	Not of this world.
	It's not about that.
	It's not about getting land for a group of people.
	That's not God's purpose.
	At all.
	It's not even close.
	Not even close.
	So, again, This has been at the center of this, and they're having debates over this.
	At the same time, we've got Jordan Peterson, who now works for Ben Shapiro.
	And he goes on with Joe Rogan, saying that anti-Semitic right-wingers are psychopathic and need to be purged.
	He said there's nothing more annoying than a successful minority.
	What in the world does he mean by that?
	And he keeps calling people psychopathic, psychopathic, psychopathic, over and over again.
	Well, here's how I define psychopathic.
	I may not be a psychiatrist who follows this weird mystic Carl Jung, who I have nothing but contempt for, just like Sigmund the fraud.
	But Carl Jung, who Jordan Peterson follows, I don't know how they would define psychopath, but I would define psychopath as somebody that is calling for the mass murder of children so that you can get their land.
	And women and men and civilians.
	I don't know how these guys define it.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about that as well.
	You know, I mentioned the landmine stuff, right?
	Let's combine the two, land and mines.
	We get landmines.
	Four nations bordering Russia are withdrawing from the landmine treaty.
	Now, the landmines are there to basically target civilians.
	They're the ones who...
	Typically get killed by these things.
	And so back in January and February, that was where we had four nations.
	Just recently we had a fifth one join it as well.
	Back in late January, early February, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia abandoned the 1997 Ottawa Convention that outlawed the use of anti-personnel landmines.
	Amid the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the Ottawa Convention sought to outlaw anti-personnel landmines that target humans in explosive blasts and have killed thousands of civilians.
	They said these mines cause unnecessary suffering and superfluous injury, and they don't really have anything to do with war strategy.
	Guess what the countries are that never signed on to this treaty?
	The countries that never signed on to this treaty are the countries that are in a perpetual state of war, the dangerous nations of this world that seek to gain by murder.
	The United States, China, Russia, North Korea, Myanmar, India, Iran, Israel.
	Those are the nations.
	And you're not familiar with Myanmar, but Myanmar is run by a horrific authoritarian dictator.
	But we know that all the rest of these countries, the U.S., China, Russia, North Korea, India, Iran, Israel, these are the world's most belligerent nations, constantly at a state of war, for whatever reason.
	And so now a fifth one, Finland, will exit this landmine treaty.
	They use this as fear of Russia.
	Now, a person, Jody Williams, who founded the international campaign to ban landmines in 1992, she said, it makes me want to scream.
	She said she's horrified by the planned exits from this landmine treaty.
	She said, it's really mind-boggling because landmines do not stop an invasion.
	Landmines don't influence the outcome of a war.
	All they do is mutilate and kill your own people.
	You're seeding your own country with these mines that don't expire over a period of time.
	They don't self-destruct.
	They're there forever.
	That's why it blows my mind.
	She said it's so stupid.
	So when governments refused to attend to this, when the UN would not do it, what they did was they went around all of these established She said we had to do it on the outside.
	Because if you go to the UN even, one country can veto or stand in the way.
	And that's an example for us because anything that is significant is going to have to be done outside of these current existing structures of national, international politics, even state government probably.
	Anything that is significant is going to have to be done by way of the people.
	It said that after they got that through, After they got that put in, I think they won the Peace Prize, I think, in 1997, that the annual landmine casualties plunged from more than 25,000 to fewer than 4,000.
	They got the destruction of more than 55 million stockpiled landmines, and they slashed the number of countries actively producing the weapons from dozens of countries to just a handful, probably those five that I told you about.
	Not five, but six or seven, I guess, that were there.
	U.S., China, Russia, etc.
	Military threats to NATO member states bordering Russia and Belarus have significantly increased, said the people getting out of the treaty.
	And she said, yeah, I understand that people would, in a perfect world, you think that a landmine barrier makes sense, but it doesn't.
	It doesn't stop determined soldiers from engaging in battle.
	All you get is a mess afterwards that threatens your own population.
	Landmines continue to kill and injure people around the world.
	The overwhelming majority, between 70 and 85 percent per year, are civilians, and 40 percent of those are children.
	What she sees is the reversal and a deeper question of whether states are now chipping away at earlier efforts to shield civilians from war.
	Bingo.
	That's it.
	That's it.
	Since World War II, and began in World War II, All the governments on both sides of that war, and since then, we have focused on civilian casualties.
	Nothing could be more unjust in a war than to do that.
	And that's what we see behind this.
	Well, thank you for joining us today.
	Tomorrow, just as a reminder, thank you to I'm Marty, who is going to be doing matching funds.
	And we'll just remind you of that tomorrow on Prime the Pump today.
	Thank you so much.
	Have a good day.
	music
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲