All Episodes
March 14, 2025 - The David Knight Show
03:02:08
Fri Episode #1968: State Shuts Down CO2 Pipeline Land Grab; NATO Owns Syria’s Bloodbath
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The End
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 14th of March, year of our Lord 2025.
Well, today we're going to go around the world.
We're going to go from the Arctic to the Amazon to debunk...
The climate MacGuffin is being used to take everything from us.
We're going to take a look at Greenland.
They've had their election.
What does that mean?
Trump says he's going to get it.
It seemed to move that direction a little bit.
And of course, more tariffs.
More tariffs on French wine and drinks.
I guess perhaps they could play a drinking game.
Every time Trump says tariff, they could have a swig, right?
But anyway, we're going to take a look at record gold.
And we're going to take a look at...
Anti-Netanyahuism.
Being sold as anti-Semitism.
A massive threat to both America and to Israel.
What is happening there.
We're going to take also a little bit more of a look at the removal by the White House of Weldon from consideration for the CDC. And Euro war.
They're back at it again.
They are arming up.
And they're inviting this guy that is massacring Christians and Alawites.
At the moment he's doing it, they're inviting him to state dinners.
Isn't that amazing?
We'll be right back.
Well, let's begin with the Arctic.
Actually, the Antarctic.
We'll get to Greenland later.
2,000 kilometers of Antarctic ice.
Covered coastline has grown slightly over the past 85 years.
Now, this is a real find.
You know, a lot of the stuff that they do, they pull it up and they interpret it, right?
You do an ice core, or whatever you do, you have a lot of interpretation in it.
But we've got a lot of different ways to measure what has been happening with the climate.
Pretty much everything except for their narrow little time frame of supposedly climate measures, man-made climate measures.
You know, going back to maybe the late 1800s in a few places, with old thermometers that were mercury thermometers that had a lot of parallax issues with them, comparing them now to digital thermometers that read out to a fraction of a degree that they have now put into urban spaces, heat islands, even on airport tarmacs.
That gives you a very different answer than if you look at all of these other...
Temperature measurements.
And now what they had was a real find.
They found forgotten aerial photos from 1937. These were things that were done by the University of Copenhagen.
And then they combined that with some other stuff that was taken by some other countries.
They started putting this stuff together and comparing it to current satellite stuff.
And guess what?
The ice caps are not disappearing.
They're actually growing a little bit.
They're basically stable, but actually a bit of growth.
Forgotten aerial photos from 1937 have given researchers at the University of Copenhagen the most detailed picture of the ice evolution in East Arctica to date.
As a result of a comprehensive analysis, the ice has remained stable and even grown slightly over almost a century.
The century!
They're supposed to have been devastating to our world.
And of course, if you look at a longer timeline, you see that we are in a very, very cold time relative to their other measurements.
So many measurements, and yet they always go by the one that gives them the results that they want.
They go by the time frame that produces the results that they want.
It's cherry-picked lies from people like Michael Manure.
Who just had to eat it really bad.
$500,000 for a frivolous lawsuit.
A slap in the face from the judge.
The S-L-A-P-P. Slap in the face.
Frivolous lawsuits.
The study reveals that ICE has not only remained stable, but grown slightly over the last 85 years.
Partly due to increasing snowfall.
Remember RFK Jr.?
What was it, about 2008 or something?
Saying, our kids will never know snowfall.
Yeah.
One of 2,200 images photographed from the seaplanes in 1937. I'm sorry, out of them.
Okay, 130 were selected for the analysis.
They combined the historical photos with modern satellite data to create 3D reconstruction of the glaciers.
They were supplemented by 165 aerial images of the same glaciers from Australian surveys conducted between 1950 and 1974. This allowed them to see pictures from the 30s to the 50s to the 70s to today.
While some of the glaciers have thinned over shorter intermediate periods of 10 to 20 years, they have remained stable or grown slightly in the long term, indicating a system imbalance.
Folks, all this stuff has been a lie.
One of the most amazing lies, excuse me, I had this a couple of days ago.
They're coming up to their COP30 climate summit.
They're going to do it in the Amazon.
They're virtue signaling about that.
And there's article after article about how these people are going through and just clear-cutting it for a road right smack dab through the precious rainforest that they say is a carbon sink.
Look, the rainforest is great.
It's got, you know, it is very important.
But these people don't care anything about that.
This is not about environmentalism.
This all grew out.
They hijacked the environmental movement, Rockefeller Foundation did.
And they made it about individual responsibility.
And a lot of people were concerned about what was happening with the environment, what the major corporations were doing, and then the major corporations in Rockefeller came in and said, well, no, it's your fault.
It's each and every one of you individually, and we're going to have to take everything away from you individually.
That was the thing that they hijacked it with in the 1970s, with Earth Day.
They made it about, they just flipped the tables.
So it's not our fault.
It's not the big corporations' fault.
It's not the government's fault.
It's your fault.
You know, give up your car, that type of thing.
So the people that want you to give up your car are the ones that are making this massive four-lane highway cut through the Amazon just for this conference.
I mean, they can't do a two-lane road or even a one-lane road, right?
They've got to have a four-lane road cut right through there.
So these people who tell you you can't fly, they have their private jets.
The people who tell you you can't have a car, they have a four-lane road cut right smack dab through the middle of the Amazon forest.
And they're going to have this ready by the conference that's coming up in November.
So you're going to be hearing a lot about this.
There's already a lot of articles about it.
It was green-lit, as they say.
Of course, all of this stuff is gas-lit, isn't it?
In order to alleviate traffic to the city, which is set to host an excess of 50,000 people at the summit.
So, they're worried about their congestion stuff.
What do they do?
Well, when they're worried about congestion in New York City or other places, they don't build any additional roads.
What they do is they charge us more money.
Will there be tolls on this road for these guys?
No, no, no.
They're the ones who collect the tolls.
They don't pay the tolls.
Logs are piled high in the cleared land, which stretches for more than eight miles through the rainforest.
As one person said, Steve Gass, it's totally insane.
Elites are destroying the environment so they can hold a conference about climate change.
Well, there's a whole...
These are not the same thing.
Climate change is not about saving the environment at all.
Not at all.
They try to imply that.
But as I said, climate change...
It is a means for the technocracy to take everything from you.
It's a MacGuffin to do that.
It's not about saving the environment at all.
Three separate private jets were used two years ago.
I'm sorry, three years ago.
For COP26. And that was for the King.
For Cameron and for Sunak to travel to COP25. A thousand private jets when they did it in 2023, and so forth.
So we talk about all that all the time.
As one article talking about this Amazon highway puts it, they say, the Amazon Earth's Mightiest Carbon Sink.
I'm sick and tired of that language.
And this is actually from What's Up With That, which is a...
This is an anti-climate change site, and they've adopted this language.
It's a carbon sink.
First of all, it's not carbon.
It's carbon dioxide that they're talking about, and that's a real distinction with that.
Secondly, let's not talk about carbon sinks when they've got us and our society circling the drain and ready to pull the plug out and flush us and all of our civilization right down the drain.
Using this kind of nonsense.
Look, folks.
CIA was pushing this peak oil stuff.
That was a lie.
I've talked about that so many times.
That was what they were pushing in the late 1970s.
You know, Earth Day.
Prior to that, population bomb and all the rest of the stuff.
Rockefeller is pushing all this stuff into individual culpability.
And then 1970, they have Earth Day for about eight years.
It's all about a global ice age that we're going into.
Then they flipped the switch immediately, and now it's about global warming.
And at the same time, we had the shock to the system of OPEC removing oil.
And so the CIA wanted us to think that there was peak oil.
That's a lie as well.
So they've hit us with one lie after the other to manipulate and to destroy our civilization.
So they can enslave us.
That's what this is ultimately about.
So, they're calling this highway sustainable.
For locals like Claudio Veriquette, who lives 200 meters from the carnage of going through this forest, it is a personal betrayal.
He was a farmer who harvested acai berries.
That was his family's livelihood.
The BBC is reporting that they have reduced everything that he was doing there, his farm and everything.
It's just been reduced to rubble.
Everything was destroyed.
He said we no longer have that income to support our family.
There's been no compensation, no benefits, just a walled-off highway built for trucks and for Summit VIPs, and not for the people that it displaces.
Because, you know, you will own nothing.
I guess he's much happier now.
As What's Up With That says, this is a master class in greenwashing.
Grandly declared COP30 to be a cop in the Amazon, not a cop about the Amazon, as if hosting it in the rainforest's backyard absolves the sin of slashing it all down.
They've turned against trees, you know.
Bill Gates doesn't like trees.
He wants them cut down and buried.
And by the way, we talk about burying trees.
The way they want to bury CO2. That gigantic grift, I want to come up to that next, that gigantic grift is being put together by the Republican governors of North and South Dakota in conjunction with the CEO running the giant pipeline from Summit.
That has just been, had a wrinkle put in it by the legislature in South Dakota.
So we're going to talk about that.
But before we leave this, Yeah, a cop.
That's the way that they want to do this.
They want to police everything you do.
No wonder they call it cop.
29, cop 30, and so forth.
So they're going to jet in thousands of delegates.
They're going to build hotels, expand airports.
They're allowed to do this.
You and I are not.
I mean, they've complained about everything, haven't they?
Including construction.
Well, construction's bad.
You're going to have to do it with all new materials, and we'll let you know when we've got them ready so that you can buy them all from us.
It's a way to monopolize, to transfer wealth, you know, monopolize all industry, all selling, transfer all wealth to them, all the rest of this.
When are people going to wake up and even stop using this language that they've thrown out there?
If you use their language, and even if you say, well, you know, this is kind of hypocritical, we're supposed to be saving CO2. No, we don't care about that.
It's not an issue.
CO2 and methane are not an issue.
Don't use that.
It's like they play these games, and as soon as you're onto them in one area, like the pandemic, the fake pandemic, then they say, well, now after they're punishing people for saying it came from the lab, now they say, no, it came from the lab, and everybody's unified in that.
Why?
To give them an alibi and to lay the foundation for what they want to do.
They're constantly doing this.
It's a mind war.
That they do through the media, through their surrogates, through their bots, through their influencers.
So they'll jet in thousands of delegates, they'll build hotels, expand airports.
They've got $81 million of federal funding from that Brazilian government that doesn't have all that much money.
Redevelop ports for cruise ships as well.
And then position themselves as saviors of the planet.
Well, again, the South Dakota land grab that is there.
This was the plan by Summit Carbon Solutions, a $9 billion, 2,500-mile-long pipeline project.
And the guy who was the CEO of that goes to Trump and Mar-a-Lago, and they bring in the governors of South Dakota and North Dakota, Kristi Noem, who's now in the Trump administration.
The Department of Homeland Security, and then Doug Burgum, who has stayed on these land issues, because he's going to be a participant in this as well.
You know, he's a multi-billionaire.
He was the governor of North Dakota.
So the two governors, Republicans, go to Trump, along with this summit CEO of this massive pipeline.
The idea is that they're going to capture CO2 and power generation and other places like that, ship it across the country, pump it into the ground.
And, of course, there's other issues about that.
You know, why are they pumping it into the ground?
What is going to happen with that?
But this particular aspect, I mean, it's just rotten in every aspect.
It's blatant crony corruption with Trump and these Republican governors who are now in his administration.
But part of what was going to make this pipeline work, which makes all the pipelines work, you know, we had the Keystone pipeline shut down, the second one shut down as soon as Biden became president on day one, he shut it down.
I think that pipeline is a good thing.
However, I didn't like the fact that eminent domain was given to a corporation to condemn property.
And not only that, but it was even a foreign corporation.
It was a Canadian corporation that had the ability to go in and condemn property, eminent domain.
So I opposed that aspect of it.
I was in favor of the pipeline in general to come from Canada, but not for them to be able to take people's land.
Same situation here.
And so the Republican South Dakota Governor Larry Rodin signed a bill yesterday banning the use of eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines.
The bill prohibits a government seizure of land for CO2 pipelines.
This leaves the fate of the Summit Carbon Solutions' $9 billion, 2,500-mile pipeline project hanging in the air like it was methane gas or something.
Because it certainly did stink.
Anyway, as South Dakota was a key player in the plan, Summit's pipeline was to transport captured CO2 from five Midwest states to an underground storage spot in South Dakota.
which has been referred to as the world's largest carbon capture project.
No, it's a crony corruption project, is what it is.
South Dakota landowners feel strongly that the threat of involuntary easements for the proposed carbon dioxide pipeline infringes on their freedoms and their property rights, said the South Carolina governor.
So, in a sense, Trump did them a favor by getting Kristi Noem out of there.
And putting in somebody else who has not bought into that crony corruption.
At least not yet.
He says, here's my open message to Summit Carbon or anyone else who wants to try to come to abuse our fellow South Dakotans, said the South Dakota House Speaker.
He said, your Green New Deal boondoggle, your lawsuits, your threats, your intimidation against our people, against our counties, against our grassroots commissioners, are not welcome here, he says, in all uppercase.
Yeah, go to Mar-a-Lago's.
Welcome there.
This guy better watch out, because when the CEO of Summit gets on the phone and calls up his employee, Trump, things could change pretty quickly.
A Summit spokesperson said, It's very unfortunate that despite our approvals in Iowa, North Dakota, Minnesota, South Dakota changed the rules in the middle of the game.
You know what?
It's not a game.
And the rules ought to be that you respect private property.
That's always been the rules that we have hopefully cherished.
That's a rule you need to abide by.
And people need to fight back against the idea that these private corporations can use eminent domain.
It was bad enough when you had the, was it Kelso thing up in Connecticut, where you had a local government condemned some property.
So it could be used by a corporation.
You know, not so that they could build a road or something like that that's supposedly for the use of the community.
No, for the benefit of a corporation.
And Kelo, I think it was, maybe.
I knew a Kelso.
I think it's Kelo.
Anyway, unfortunately, the Supreme Court.
Agreed that that was okay.
So what do they do?
They take it to the next step.
It's not just that they're going to have the city do the condemnation.
Now they're going to let these massive pipeline places just go through and willy-nilly destroy farms that have been in a family for 150 years in many cases.
Whether it's an oil pipeline or whether it's a CO2 pipeline.
Same thing.
So...
Steve Malloy, who I've interviewed multiple times, Steve Malloy was the one who discovered all that scam of hooking people up and exposing them to fine particulate matter that was 72 times what the EPA said was safe, so they could make a case to ban anything that burned anything.
Fireplaces, barbecue grills, you name it.
That was at the EPA in Research Triangle Park in North Carolina.
Steve Malloy is now a senior fellow at E&E Legal.
Energy and Environment Legal said this is definitely a win for the little guy.
Carbon capture is economically, politically, and physically impossible.
He said it is totally bogus.
It is the only reason it's happening is because oil companies can get taxpayer subsidies for it.
He pointed out how carbon capture's expensive price tag, the unpopularity of eminent domain and underground storage issues, makes it an extraordinarily difficult practice.
He also noted that the government can only seize land for public use.
And that there is no legitimate public use for CO2 pipelines.
He also referenced both the Mississippi CO2 pipeline rupture as well as the Lake Nyos disaster in Cameroon in 1986 that both destroyed land and livestock.
The Cameroon pipeline explosions even left 1,700 people dead.
But, of course, they just look at us as their livestock, don't they?
Yeah, killed 10 million chickens, 1,700 people.
I don't care.
So he says, so this is good for South Dakota.
It's good for all of us.
And again, what happened with this?
This is where our hope lies at the local level.
We can get things done at the local level.
We had a real setback here in Tennessee.
I'm going to get to that later.
But still, it's always a fight.
You're not guaranteed to always win.
And any of these things.
But you're guaranteed to always lose when it comes to Washington.
Yes, you are.
I mean, you know, people like Trump are going to, they're going to grift.
They're going to be bought.
And they're going to sell you out.
Your only chance of stopping this is going to be at the local and state level.
The closer you get to you, the more of a chance you've got to do something about that.
That's one of the things that, you know, Elon Musk said that about George Soros, and he's right.
But of course, he can get really, really, you know, for the rest of us, that matters.
But he understands that he can get what he wants by buying the president.
Amazon, Google, and Meta are planning to triple nuclear energy capacity by 2050. You know, these Malthusians who were pushing all this stuff in the middle of the 20th century.
Who initiated all this stuff.
So we just can't keep doubling everything.
We're doubling our energy use and we're doubling the number of people.
We can't keep doing that.
Well, yeah.
Tell that to these people.
I mean, they're going to triple the amount of nuclear energy in 25 years.
And, of course, it is more expensive, more dangerous than coal, oil, gas, far more.
And the other question is, where are you going to get this uranium?
You know, we have virtually unlimited amounts of coal in the United States.
Got a lot of oil, got a lot of gas.
We don't have the uranium.
Got to go to Kazakhstan, got to go to Russia.
There's some uranium in Canada and Australia, but for the most part, they keep pushing us towards these things that we don't have, right?
You know, you've got to have electric vehicles.
Well, who's got the materials that they need for electric vehicles?
Well, China.
Who's got the uranium that they need for nuclear reactors?
Russia?
Kazakhstan?
Do you see the plan here?
The plan is to destroy the West.
These people are traitors.
And, of course, beyond that, we're talking about Amazon, Google, Meta, which is Facebook.
Private power provisions here.
That's another kind of PPP, I guess.
Private power provisions.
Private power plants.
They are not going to do it for us.
And remember when Trump, right as soon as he became president, he holds that conference about Stargate.
We're going to use AI to analyze your cancer and custom make an mRNA jab for you.
Yeah, you better come armed.
That's a hill to die on.
Anyway, these private power plants were part of it.
Trump said, you don't want to use the grid.
The grid is old, it's vulnerable to attack.
Build your power plant right next to your power plant, or right next to your manufacturing plant, is what he was telling them all.
Yeah, we're not going to do anything for the American people.
That one little quote from Trump, Summed up his entire second-term administration.
Let's do this on our own and leave the rest of them to die.
This is the, you know, what we're seeing with this technocracy is really kind of a logical consequence of the kind of thinking that we've had in America and in the West since the end of World War II. You go back to Raven Rock, the Cold War.
The plan to save themselves and let the rest of us die.
Well, that's been going on for a very long time now.
It's been going on for 80 years.
And after 80 years of that kind of thinking, well, it's not just a nuclear war, but it's in everything.
The plan to save themselves and to provide for themselves and let the rest of us die.
They will have the private jets, the private cars, the custom roads cut through the Amazon.
You will die.
They will have the power plants.
Your power grid is old.
Vulnerable is going to go away.
And it's going to be Trump and his buddies.
These elitist technocrats.
The billionaire class that owns him.
That's what this is all about.
So, uranium dioxide prices hit a 16-year high early 2024 due to supply concerns and to rising demand.
And again, we don't have that much...
Uranium that we know of in America.
So let's move to a power source that is more expensive, more dangerous, and we don't have the fuel.
Makes a lot of sense, doesn't it?
And how do they sell that?
They get everybody concerned about CO2, which every living thing puts out and the plants need.
Speaking of the battery issues, the so-called Democratic Republic of Congo It's really the Democratic Republic of Cobalt.
They have, I think it's 73%, 76% of the world's cobalt supplies are in the Democratic Republic of Cobalt.
And you've got to have it for the electric vehicle batteries.
And they've got to have child slave labor to dig it out by hand.
And so they are flexing their muscle here, because all the money goes to a couple of dictators who are running that country.
It's very heavily used in lithium-ion batteries, backbone of the renewable energy industry.
Isn't that wonderful?
The price of cobalt has soared by 43%, because 76% of it is coming from them.
This is the infrastructure that they want.
The infrastructure that they want to build.
It's doomed to fail in multiple ways.
It's designed to fail in multiple ways because it's about the industrialization of the West and them taking everything.
Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about what happened at the CDC hearing.
I mean, he was on his way to the hearing.
It was just as it was about to happen, and they did a rug pull on Weldon.
But as I look at his background, even though he's had a pretty good background, he looks like another one of these people who has now turned.
I really think that if it had gone through, that he would have kowtowed to Senator Cassidy, the representative of Big Pharma and the Devil.
He gets all these people to kowtow to him.
Evidently, Cassidy didn't think that he would, though.
And so he killed the nomination.
So we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
Stay with us.
A penny saved is a penny earned.
Though, that's gotten tougher since they've stopped making them.
Maybe it's time to start saving a different type of coin.
Such as the new David Knight Show supporter, Commemorative Coin.
Saving these coins earns support for independent media.
Featuring striking bas-relief with bold raised details and premium painted accents.
It's not just a trinket, but a statement, a declaration.
A way to show you refuse to be controlled by the establishment.
It's a limited run of just 100 coins.
So, much like the penny, when they're gone, they're gone.
They silence independent voices.
They censor the truth.
But you can stand with real journalism and own a piece of the resistance.
These coins saved is The David Knight Show sustained.
Available now at TheDavidKnightShow.com You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Andy there.
Thank you for this comment, Andy.
He says, back in the saddle again, nothing gives me the get up and go like my limited edition David Knight coin conveniently displayed next to my coffee maker.
Well, thank you very much.
And this is the coin, so you can see.
It's very large.
And it is really nice.
I want to thank for the love of the road, Ryan, for putting that together.
And I think this is about half of them are gone.
So when they're gone, they're gone.
You know, about half of the 100 are gone.
Brian Taylor.
An interesting thing about the Amazon is that some people think it's man-made forest.
There's interesting soil found in Amazon, and a lot of the plants are crop plants, like nut trees.
Oh, that is interesting.
Who knows?
Yeah.
We're all dead.
It says, Tesla is now writing letters to the White House urging them to reconsider the downstream impacts and the retaliatory trade practices that could hurt Tesla.
Yeah.
You know, the initial ones were going to benefit Tesla.
But, you know, that's what happens when you start a war.
You never know the direction that it's going to go, and you never know all the collateral damage that's going to happen.
And that includes trade wars, just like it does the hot wars.
T. Norman Artis says, how will they enslave us without electricity?
Got to have it.
They've got to have it.
They've got to have it.
And they'll dole out a little bit of it to us.
They'll ration it out.
I mean, look at a lot of the third world countries, right?
They turn on the lights at a certain amount of times.
So you have a little bit of time so that you can charge up your tracking device, your phone, things like that, right?
But they'll have the power to run their cameras everywhere.
All the rest of the stuff, I mean, you don't need.
And they'll give you some power so that you can be brainwashed by their programming and their entertainment and things like that.
But they will keep you on a very, very tight leash.
As a matter of fact, you look at a lot of these countries.
Cuba, I saw an interesting article.
It said, if you're going to Cuba, you've got to bring your electricity with you.
That should make for some interesting travel arrangements.
Get into electro from Spider-Man getting on.
Take this plane to Cuba.
Don't frag me, bro.
If you're not prepared and willing to live outside their new grid...
When they destroy the old one, then you'll be living in their smart shitties, he says.
That's right.
Yeah.
As a matter of fact, excuse me.
I have a letter that I want to get to shortly here from a listener comparing what a lot of people are doing to prepare.
Taking a look at American society right now versus what is happening in Russia in terms of family gardens and things like that.
You know, there are things that you can do, and you need to start working on that.
I mean, we started doing that this last year.
Karen is the one that's really been doing it.
She's been the one preparing all the stuff, doing the chickens.
And growing food for the first time.
We had great crops last year.
She did an excellent job.
She's going to branch out on some other stuff this year.
Let's talk a little bit about this CDC nomination.
Oh, Sub-Zero.
Thank you very much.
That is very generous.
I appreciate that.
It says, keep up the great work, DK and family.
It says, let's fill up the tip jar.
I appreciate that.
By the way, that reminds me.
Whistler was telling me about this because I let him and Travis work with the crypto stuff because we get pulled into this crypto thing by Rockfin.
And what happens is when you donate on Rockfin, they transfer it over to their own crypto.
They've got their own crypto coin called Ray.
And lately, it's been a big problem trying to get tips out of there because there's just not a lot of liquidity for that cryptocurrency.
So we have to transfer it from that cryptocurrency.
You give them a contribution in dollars and they convert it to this crypto.
Don't ask me why.
I got an idea.
But anyway, they convert to a crypto.
Then we got to convert it from that to Ethereum and then from Ethereum to dollars.
And so it's an expensive route.
We had some problems with Rumble, but now they've gotten on a regular paying basis.
So I just want to let people know if you want to donate to the program.
And of course, if your bank supports it, Zelle has no fees.
And then there's checks, and I've got a list of people's names who are checks.
And we're going to update the gas gauge here and let you know where we stand with that.
But just as a word, made me think about that.
Just to let you know, we've been able to get it out, but it's getting increasingly difficult to get it out with ROGFAN. I don't know what's going to happen with that crypto.
Just a heads up, I don't want to see you waste money with that.
Let's talk about what happened with the CDC nomination for CDC Director Dave Weldon, a guy who was a former Florida congressman for 14 years, also a physician, an internist.
Somebody who knew what he was doing, and because he had the temerity to question what they were doing with the vaccines.
Oh, they are after him.
And he did a lot of really good stuff with vaccines.
As I looked at his reaction, though, I thought, well, you know, I guess nobody's going to get through unless they kowtow to this stuff.
And it looked like he thought that he'd kowtowed enough to them, but evidently it wasn't even enough.
He said to Cassidy, I thought we were friends.
Say that to the devil.
But Lucifer, I thought we were friends.
We had a deal, didn't we?
That's what always happens with all the Faustian stories.
Anyway, Weldon is an internal medicine doctor who served in the House of Representatives from 1995 to 2009. While in Congress, he was one of the sponsors of a bill that would have banned mercury from vaccines.
And so when the mainstream press, Axios, talks about this, they said in a 2007 statement on a different bill he sponsored, Weldon wrote, quote, And the childhood epidemic of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism.
Thimerosal has been used as a preservative in vaccines, although it was taken out of childhood vaccines in 2001, says the CDC. Axios will tell you, the studies have found no evidence of any connection between vaccines and autism, and thimerosal is just great.
We didn't even need to take it out, but we did it just to please these prickly skeptics like...
This physician, Weldon.
So here's the thing.
You know, since when is it good to inject mercury into your body, and why would you put mercury in there?
This is the whole thing about the adjuvants, right?
They say, well, we've got to agitate your immune system.
We've got to really hit it with something that it's going to react to.
And so we put these adjuvants in.
Those adjuvants are the things that are causing a lot of this stuff, especially when you're doing multiple vaccines.
You're getting a lot of adjuvants put in.
You're getting a lot of things like mercury and aluminum and other stuff like that to trigger your body.
Just yesterday, I was talking about the fact that proteins of things that are not harmful.
I mean, mercury is harmful.
It's a poison.
It's a heavy metal poison.
Nobody takes mercury supplements.
Nobody takes aluminum supplements.
Not intentionally.
They put it in our food in a lot of different ways, but we do everything we can to try to keep those things out.
I remember in the 90s, I used contact lenses a little bit when I was in college, but not much.
They really burned my eyes, blood red and everything.
And so we were at an optometrist getting some glasses, and the optometrist asked about contact lenses, and I said, no, I can't wear them.
They make my eyes go, you know.
And I said, it's a preservative that was in there.
And he goes, well, that's thimerosal.
He said, that's mercury.
I was like, what?
He says, yeah, we don't use that anymore.
But they kept doing, they kept after that.
They went for like another, you know, five to seven years still putting it in vaccines to inject it in people's bodies.
When, if I just got it in my eye, my eyes would turn blood red and burn.
So, you know, that is, they say, well, there's nothing wrong with that.
But because he pushed back on that a long time ago, well, now he was on Big Pharma's list.
You know, just like me and YouTube, right?
They're not going to let him get past the gatekeepers.
So, Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington, evidently owned by Big Pharma.
So, you know, and of course Axios says there are obligatory vows to Big Pharma.
Studies have found no evidence of a connection between vaccines and autism.
Okay, tell us this, Axios.
Tell us this, Cassidy, who likes it.
You don't do any more studies.
We've done some studies.
We didn't find anything.
So stop doing those studies.
Well, do you want to do some studies, Cassidy, on what is causing this epidemic of autism?
We really do have an epidemic of that, don't we?
It's an explosion.
A real epidemic.
A real health issue.
And you don't care what the cause is?
You don't want any study?
He does that because he knows.
He knows that this is causing it.
And he knows that if they do a study, they'll find it.
So, they want to shut it down because they would rather get their paycheck from Big Pharma and let children and their families be destroyed with autism.
That's the kind of people they are.
So, Patty Murray said Walden had repeated debunked claims about vaccines in a meeting that they had just last month.
So, again, Patty Murray knows better than this internist.
Are you going to trust a politician?
They like to argue from authority, right?
Well, you've got a physician over here, and they are not uniform in their understandings of things.
But if you want to pull that credentials card, what credentials does she have?
She doesn't know anything about these studies.
She hasn't read them.
She wouldn't understand them if she did.
All she understands is a paycheck that she gets.
Here's a bit of Weldon.
It's a long clip.
We're not going to play all of it.
But here he is talking about some of the data.
There's some, I think, some very, very troubling issues that have not been resolved.
And the thing that I continue to find extremely disturbing is the fact that the CDC still does not allow researchers access to the vaccine safety data.
If everything was so objective and any scientist at all can look at this stuff, it would be one thing, but they continue to deny people access to this information, and until we get a free and open dialogue within the scientific community, I don't think, for one, I will ever be satisfied that there isn't some data suggesting that some children may have serious side effects from...
Some of these vaccines that is really going undetected, unnoticed, and yes, it may actually cause autism.
Well, there you go.
He says, what I don't understand is the CDC's got all this data.
Why are they keeping it away from people?
And he got in trouble because he gave some of the data to some researchers.
Now, let me ask you this.
All these MAGA cult people, and I put out a tweet.
I didn't look to see if anybody responded to it.
I said, all of you who say, well, RFK Jr., yes, his mission is to expose the data.
And so he's going to go along with them and he's going to pay lip service and promote the vaccines and promote the measles, supposed epidemic and all the rest of this stuff.
Play along with them.
He's just playing 4D chess because he's got to get the data.
Well, here's the guy who wanted the CDC to get the data.
He was there at the CDC. Now, I wonder why Trump didn't say to Cassidy or these other Republicans who voted against him, I'm going to primary you out, like he did to Massey.
Remember?
Massey said, I'm not voting for the continuing resolution.
And so he said, I'm going to primary you out.
Made a big issue out of that.
I said at the time it wasn't about the continuing resolution.
It was about Massey and AIPAC and Israel.
And that's really what it was.
But just, you know, for these people who think that's what it was about, if Trump really wanted somebody in the CDC and the NIH and HHS and all the rest of it, if he wanted people in these different agencies to expose the truth and to get to the bottom of what's causing autism, why wouldn't he pressure?
Cassidy.
Instead, all the pressure was going the other way.
Cassidy was telling Trump what Trump could not do.
And Trump just passively went along with it.
Oh yeah?
You don't like the guy?
Okay.
He's on his way, walking to the confirmation hearing.
And they say, forget about it.
We're pulling you.
So the White House withdrew its nomination of Dave Weldon.
The White House official...
Who was not authorized to speak publicly, told NPR that Walden didn't have the votes needed for confirmation by the Senate.
Trump announced Walden as his pick to lead the CDC back in November, praising his experience as a medical doctor, Army veteran, politician, family man, and Senator Patty Murray, who was a Democrat, but it was also Cassidy, and Susan Collins of Maine, another Republican.
It was Murray who said, it's dangerous to put someone in charge at the CDC who believes the lie that our rigorously tested childhood vaccine schedule, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Well, you know, it's never been tested, quite frankly.
They've never done a controlled experiment to see.
Well, we do have it.
We could epidemiologically look at the experiment.
We have the data.
You know, you got the typical American child who gets 72 vaccines.
At an early age.
And then you've got the Amish.
They could look at them and say, why is it that we don't have any autism in the Amish and things like that?
But they don't want to do that.
They've never gone through and actually done a test where they give a child in a couple of years 72 vaccines, and then they've got another cohort of children where they don't give them the vaccine and then look at what happens with the autism rates.
They don't do that.
You know, there's drug interactions with things, right?
And if you do this over and over again, you're going to get a different interaction.
They've never tested that.
Never tested.
They don't typically test the vaccines anyway.
Be My Valentine says, aluminum is very difficult to chillate out of the body.
Yeah.
There's that as well.
Amos Poole, thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
That's very kind.
He says, Weldon is an insider.
That has seen the papers the CDC, Dr. William Thompson revealed, where he admitted to cooking the books and hiding autism dangers.
Yeah, and when you look at the comments that are here, you can see that Weldon was, he was like what we're seeing with RFK Jr., you know, who kept saying, well, I'm pro-vax, and he really is.
I got all the vaccines.
I got my kids all the vaccines.
I think they're great.
Blah, blah, blah.
And now we're seeing everybody said, no, no, he's still concerned about it.
No, he's pro-vax.
You got Jay Bhattacharya, who has become a big cheerleader for MMR and for the idea that there is a measles epidemic.
What a laughable joke.
What a laughable joke.
And it's something that we need to be concerned about.
Basically, I'm a big cheerleader for that.
These people are showing what they are and have been for a long time.
So anyway, I'm just saying that under the assumption, the superficial assumption, Dave Weldon looks at this and he wants to get in and he knows it and he's going to expose it, right?
These guys have seen it.
They know it.
They're going to expose it.
No, they've seen it.
They know it.
And they're going to keep it quiet, I think, is what would have happened if they'd gotten in.
There'd be controlled opposition.
I think their function is not to expose the data.
Their function is, as they have said over and over again, their function is to restore trust in these institutions.
They're not there to reform the institutions.
They're not there to produce safe drugs.
They're there to restore your trust.
But going on with the story, because I think it is interesting.
Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski.
Said she raised her concerns about his views on vaccines with the White House.
Susan Collins of Maine, also Bill Cassidy of Louisiana.
Three Republicans.
And I don't know what Bill Cassidy is about on other issues.
Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski are not really with, they're not conservative, not really with the Republicans on most issues, but I don't know about Cassidy.
He may be a conservative who's been bought by pharmaceutical companies or whatever.
Dr. George Benjamin, who's head of the American Public Health Association.
Think about this.
They have an association of people who do public health.
As I've said before, we're talking about public health, public education, public transportation.
Just understand what the public means.
It means that they are anti-health, they're anti-education.
They're anti-transportation when it comes to individual.
They're anti-individual transportation, anti-individual health, and all the rest of this stuff.
Why don't you just call it, instead of the Public Health Association, just call it the COVID Commies Association?
Because these are the people that were out there running all this stuff.
So he cited Weldon's anti-vaccine history amid the developing measles issues.
After his congressional career, Weldon returned to practice as an internal medicine doctor in Florida.
And here's the other thing.
He was also board chairman for the Pro-Israel Advocacy Group, Israel Allies Foundation.
Even that couldn't save him from the pharmaceutical people.
He thought he was a made man.
I'm a Zionist.
I'm friends with Senator Cassidy.
I've recanted this stuff.
But once he exposed them on a small issue, they don't forget.
So he's speaking out and saying that it was torpedoed by the usual suspects, as we know.
He said they changed their mind.
They had told him that they were going to vote for him.
So what do you think?
changed their minds.
Did they have a phone call made to them by their pharmaceutical masters?
Weldon said, many people feel Big Pharma actually feared me more than they feared Bobby because of my credibility and my knowledge of science and medicine.
In other words, he's an internist.
Internal medicine, I guess, is the right way to say that.
He said, so if they had to live with Bobby for four years, they were definitely not going to have both him and me put serious pressure on Collins and Cassidy.
He said there was some kind of an alliance between Pharma and Senator Cassidy.
Yeah, no kidding.
That was Children's Health Defense making that comment.
He was too outspoken on vaccines, is what it really looks like to me, said Mary Holland, the non-profit executive of Children's Health Defense.
She said, vaccines are the magic sauce that keeps the chronic disease epidemic going.
And I think Dave Walden understood that.
My guess is that there was some kind of alliance between Pharma and Senator Cassidy and some of his compatriots in the Senate, you think?
We saw that over and over again.
It was too outspoken on vaccines is what it really looks like to me, which is, you know, vaccines are the magic sauce that keeps the chronic disease epidemic going.
And I think Dave Weldon understood that perfectly.
And my guess is there was some kind of an alliance between Pharma and Senator Cassidy and some of his compatriots in the Senate to kill the nomination.
No real explanation at all why the Weldon nomination was...
But Senator Cassidy at the very beginning sort of talked about distrust in health agencies and the context of measles, which would seem to be a lot of what was going on.
You know, that they didn't have the votes for Weldon on the health committee.
And I can tell you that I and many people who were there and on text threads that were on are just tremendously disappointed.
Weldon was perfectly credentialed, having been a member of Congress and a physician and a Republican, to take that job.
And he was outspoken about vaccines.
He understands vaccines candidly better than any of the other key appointments that Bobby was proposing.
So there you go.
Do you trust these people?
Do you trust the Trump administration?
He didn't want to fight for him.
By the way, this part of it I thought was interesting.
The Wall Street Journal, in terms of process of how he found out about this.
Wall Street Journal reported that the change of heart came nearly at the last minute, with Weldon finding out the news from one of the journal's reporters just after 9 a.m.
as he was on his way to the hearing.
At about 9.15 a.m., a Senate staffer reportedly told those gathered outside the hearing room that the hearing was canceled.
So, and again, I was talking about it, I said, so this is going to be interesting to see.
Is he going to kowtow and kiss the feet of Pharma's Senator Cassidy?
He belongs to the Pharma Party as far as I'm concerned, not the Republican Party or Democrat Party.
This is one uni party.
And so I said, it'll be interesting to see what he does today.
Well, then we had a listener say, they just pulled him.
It's like, whoa.
That was a surprise.
And so Daily Beast said, he's touted a false link between vaccines and autism.
Okay, so do you, Daily Beast?
Of course they don't.
Do you care?
What is the link about autism?
Why is it exploded?
Do you care to look?
No, they don't care to look.
They care to protect pharma.
The CDC, Argues that there's only been evidence of minor reactions due to doses of thimerosal in vaccines.
There you go.
It's rare.
Doesn't matter, right?
Whatever happens to you or your family, folks, if you take their poison, their response is always going to be, it's rare.
It hardly ever happens.
It's just minor.
We're not really worried about it, right?
We've got a black box label.
Oh, nobody told you about it?
Well, it's not our fault.
You know, go sue the physician or the pharmacist.
But you can't sue the pharmaceutical company.
And you can't sue FDA because they put that black box label out there.
These other people were supposed to tell you about it.
So they indemnify themselves.
They hold themselves harmless for selling antibiotics and the rest of these pharmaceutical poisons.
They actually put in the 1986 law specifically for vaccines to shut you down from getting any compensation, to protect the government, to protect the pharmaceutical companies, and to keep this epidemic and this depopulation going.
And then, you know, when it comes to the other stuff, well, okay, we did our due diligence and we put a black box label on it, but we still let people sell it.
So, is that even still?
The public health service agencies, The American Academy of Pediatrics and the vaccine makers agreed, even though the CDC had said, well, there's nothing wrong with putting mercury in a vaccine and injecting it into your body.
Even so, out of an abundance of caution and out of goodwill, these people with kindness in their hearts said that they agreed that they would reduce, maybe even eliminate, thimerosal in vaccines as a precautionary measure.
So there you go.
Isn't that nice?
These people, they really are worthy of your trust, aren't they?
Yeah.
So, again, when you look at his statements, he said, Unfortunately, I took on the CDC and pharma regarding another childhood vaccine safety issue, the safety of measles and a vaccine called MMR. More than 25 years ago, there were a series of articles published by a British pediatric gastroenterologist named Andrew Wakefield.
He had seen many parents who claimed that after the MMR, their child not only deteriorated developmentally, but also had become fussy eaters, developed diarrhea.
He did colonoscopies of the children and discovered that they had a new form of inflammatory bowel disease, as research was later duplicated.
And to this day, he has been credited for defining this form of childhood inflammatory bowel disease.
He published 15 papers in all.
Only one was withdrawn.
The one that created the big controversy was published in a journal called Lancet, and one of the co-authors on the paper was a highly respected Irish virologist by the name of O'Leary.
The CDC was charged with the responsibility of repeating to Wakefield's research and showing that the measles vaccine was safe, but they never did it the right way.
They never did a clinical study.
They looked at an epidemiological study, he said.
Again, as in the Mercury study, there were claims made that the indicators that there was a problem with MMR was there.
CDC was accused again of changing the protocol and the data analysis until the association went away.
Ironically, he said, I talked to Wakefield after this was over and he agreed with me that we have to vaccinate our kids for measles.
You see, what would have been done would have been limited.
But they can't take even that limited chance.
You know, for all they know, some of these people might have grown a conscience and a spine.
Some of these people might have started looking at the data and said, we can't do this anymore.
And so, if anybody is even questionable and not 100% on board with them, they will shut them down.
Folks, Trump's not going to save you.
None of these appointments are going to save you.
The CDC and the FDA aren't going to warn you.
The FDA tells the drug companies they're free to do anything.
You're going to have to do it for yourself, for your children, for your grandchildren.
Educate yourself.
Try to educate other people.
Try to explain to them.
Do the best that you can.
You're never going to be able to convince everybody.
But the government is not ever.
And so, as I kept reading about his history here, he kept protesting more and more about how he wasn't anti-vax.
You know what?
I am proud to be anti-vax.
I'm proud to be anti-vax.
And I'm not just anti-vax.
I'm anti-pharma.
And, you know, I would never, ever suggest to anybody to take anything produced by these criminals.
They have been given billions of dollars in fines.
And for the kind of money that these murdering poisoners have made, it is nothing but a slap on the wrist.
That's the kind of damage that they have done.
Why would anybody ever take anything from a pharmaceutical company?
I'm anti-pharma, not just anti-vax.
And when you look at it now, McCary, Bhattacharya, they're sailing through.
Cheerleading for the MMR, cheerleading for the fake measles epidemic that is all going on.
This is all just to have fake folks, to build trust.
And I think probably Weldon would have bowed and scraped to Cassidy.
And the pharmaceutical companies, I think he would have sold himself to the devils.
Only time would have...
Told, but, you know, they aren't going to take any chances.
None whatsoever.
I said, Weldon's nomination was pulled amidst the Texas measles outbreak.
What an interesting coincidence that that happened right at this time.
To pull these guys in line.
Yeah, really interesting coincidence, isn't it?
Vaccine skeptic Dave Weldon is up.
To lead the CDC as measles and flu raged.
Did you notice that measles and flu were raging?
Did you notice all the bird flu, wild birds falling out of the sky and everything?
Yeah, the sky is falling.
The earth is melting.
All the polar ice caps are melting.
They got one lie after the other.
It's a big propaganda fear machine to lie to us and to keep us in line.
Dozens march for vaccine victims in London.
Dozens.
Only dozens.
To support those injured by the COVID vaccine.
They said the UK declared Sunday to be a COVID day of reflection.
You know, yesterday's guard reminded me was the fifth anniversary of Trump's executive order of emergency and everything.
And just fought this stuff for so long.
It is, you know, even that date, you know.
But let's get together.
Let's remember the people who died because of COVID. Well, they had just a few dozen people who said, let's remember how our own government killed people.
It wasn't something that came out of the lab.
Well, it was.
It was their vaccine that came out of the lab.
But it wasn't some kind of gain-of-function lab leak.
It wasn't a bioweapon outside of the vaccine that killed people.
It was what they were doing in the hospitals and paying people.
Brits injured by the COVID vaccine don't have much of a recourse, but they got more of a recourse even than people here in the United States.
I mean, when you look at how they gave the vaccine companies immunity for the childhood poisoning in 1986, the mass poisoning, and then...
To make sure, because they knew they were going to be pulling this off, you know, they did the Dark Winter simulation in 2001, two weeks before 9-11, put out the rules two months after.
So two months before 9-11, they do the dark winter thing.
Two months after 9-11 and the anthrax attack that happened a week later, they put out model legislation to get the states to do what they need to do because they couldn't direct it under the 10th Amendment from the federal government.
So they're going to do it with state legislation and money from a patsy, puppet-like Trump.
And so they planned all this stuff out.
And then in 2005, George W. Bush...
And again, he was there with 9-11.
He was there with Dark Winter and all the rest of this stuff.
I mean, everybody understands George W. Bush and 9-11 and the inside job.
But look, this was the other shoe to drop.
And it both dropped before and after 9-11.
You know, this bioweapon against us.
And he was involved in that.
So in 2005, he puts together the PREP Act, which means that you don't get anything.
You don't get anything if you're hurt by these experimental vaccines.
And it's not all that experimental.
They knew exactly what they were doing.
But in the UK, claimants who are approved receive a one-time payment of £120,000, which is about $158,000.
That's it.
Claims have to include a medical assessment affirming that the vaccine caused the injury.
Given that all official health bodies insist that COVID-19 vaccine is safe, however, Such validation is difficult to obtain.
So thousands of alleged vaccine victims have been denied compensation because medical assessors have determined that there's not enough evidence to prove that the injuries were caused by the shots.
Only 500 were turned away before even receiving a medical assessment and give them an exam.
No, no, we already know.
No, no.
I gotta look.
The approved claims were from injuries caused by Britain's own AstraZeneca vaccine, of which 50 million doses were administered in the UK. So it's a very small percentage of people who are getting it.
The one person who got it said, well, you might think that £120,000 is massive, about $158,000.
Said Claire Brown, who was one of the few vaccine victims to be awarded compensation.
She became paralyzed after taking the AstraZeneca shot, April 2021. She said, I've been in civil service all my life.
I was used to getting that money, but the bottom line is it doesn't clear your mortgage and modify your house.
In other words, you're going to have to live off of that the rest of your life.
So, you think this is over?
Canada doesn't think it's over.
They've just spent $50 million to bolster parliamentary security because of what happened with the Freedom Convoy.
And, of course, it wasn't just Trudeau who was out there calling these people violent terrorists.
The Freedom Convoy did it perfectly.
They did it absolutely the way that it should have been done.
But that didn't keep Trudeau and his goons from arresting people like Artur Pawlowski and other people.
I mean, you saw they were peaceful.
They were orderly.
And yet, they still came after them.
And the guy who's taking Trudeau's place, this Mark Carney guy, he was out there calling them terrorists as well.
As a matter of fact, he was more outspoken than Trudeau.
And now the Canadian government is expanding its police force $50 million over the next five years.
And they're going to have 49 civilian and sworn employees.
It'll be patrolling Parliament Hill.
So you've got about 50 people they're going to hire.
And they're going to spend $50 million.
So it's about a million each.
But of course, that's over five years.
So $200,000 they're going to spend on that.
And so the question is, why?
What's the government planning on doing?
Are they going to do this again?
You bet they're going to do it again.
We know they're going to do it again.
They got away with it the first time.
Trudeau got re-elected.
Trump got re-elected.
It's unclear whether the government intends to impose mandates that might spark mass protests, or if three years later, Canadian bureaucrats continue to feel threatened by the movement's popularity.
Mark Carney, country's next prime minister, the former Bank of Canada governor, former Bank of England governor as well, accused the Freedom Convoy protesters of sedition.
Sedition.
He said, this is sedition.
No, you know what?
What the government of Canada did was sedition against the Constitution.
They were the ones who led an insurrection against the Constitution.
He says, That's Mark Carney,
the big central banker who is committed to all these Marxist ideologies that people wrongfully call woke.
They're not woke.
They're Marxist.
These people are not Leninist Marxists.
They are Gramsci Marxists.
They want to march through the institutions.
DG8. Thank you.
Says, David, I've been sick for over a week.
I'm sorry.
Finally, I decided to go to urgent care yesterday.
What a mistake.
They took my blood pressure and then told me they were giving me a COVID test.
I refused, and they proceeded to tell me that they couldn't help me if I wouldn't take their test.
So I walked out, and they still billed me.
Wow.
Wow.
Actually, I think there is...
I want to look at this.
I think Biden put something in saying that they can't hit you your credit score with an unpaid medical bill.
I don't know, but I would certainly protest that.
Just amazing.
Wow, that's amazing.
12 June 1776, Jefferson was mercury poisoned for his inflammatory bowels.
Oh, yeah.
The thing that causes it or exasperates it.
There you go.
Once I saw big pharma marketing departments were over twice the size of their research and development departments, I became anti-pharma.
The thing that woke me up was when I found out about the 1986 thing with Fauci.
That was what woke me up.
And then I found out about Dark Winter and the rest of this stuff.
It's just been an ongoing revelation.
That's why I say I am firmly anti-pharma.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
We're going to take a quick break.
We're going to take a quick break.
Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow, or more specifically, what comes out the other end.
Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
Carefully contrived to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
Is it merely a MacGuffin?
The David Knight Show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
As a matter of fact, Sprumford, I say, you know, when I look at this in the pharma department, it's not just the 1986 stuff, too.
It's also what came out with the opioid epidemic.
And, you know, seeing how these people...
Not only what they did, talking about marketing departments, you know, how they enticed and with vacations and bonuses and all this other kind of stuff, these doctors, to over-prescribe and to prescribe these painkillers in situations where they're not warranted and getting people addicted to that.
And then how the government handled all that stuff with kid gloves.
They didn't do civil asset forfeiture against these drug-pushing criminals who had destroyed people's lives, driven people into suicide.
Didn't do any of that stuff.
And to me, I thought that was extremely reprehensible.
I mean, it wasn't even people who, on the advice of their doctors, I mean, they were not even taking a gamble trying to get high for fun.
They were just in a great deal of pain, and their doctors, and the pharmaceutical companies especially, took advantage of them.
I want to thank the people who have sent checks.
These are the checks that we...
Got at the beginning of the week, actually, last weekend.
Real quickly.
Thank you very much.
Kimberly S. Lois L. Gray B. Timothy W. David and Debbie W.
And, of course, Anthony, who did the matching funds.
Thank you so much, all of you, for keeping this broadcast going.
I want to talk a little bit about some of the emails that I got, because I had some interesting things from many of you, and I don't always get to all of them, so I want to move them up earlier in the show today.
This was from Sam, who sends us a lot of stuff.
He says, and there it is, monetizing America's resource assets and perhaps the interim counting them on the balance sheet in hopes of borrowing more money.
Time will tell what they're going to do with all this stuff.
And he took a clip of an article abstraction that was talking about Trump's first 100 days.
The U.S. Interior Chief pitches resources on federal lands.
As assets that are worth trillions of dollars.
Of course, this is Doug Burgum, who I was talking about earlier.
The fact that, you know, and as North Dakota governor, he was all part of this pipeline, CO2 pipeline scam.
And now the state legislature in South Dakota has stopped that eminent domain scam.
But this is what Doug Burgum said.
Burgum to argue for using resources to pay for the nation's debt.
We knew this was coming, didn't we?
Boom.
He alluded to that in his confirmation hearing.
You know, I think that our government land, and he's now, Trump put him in charge as Secretary of the Interior.
So he's in a position to use all these lands if that's what they want to do with it, I guess.
He's got his guy in there.
This guy who had been at Mar-a-Lago conspiring with him to run this crony capitalist scheme of this CO2 pipeline.
What an absolute idiotic thing.
You know, pumping CO2 gas, as if it was some kind of a poison or something, across the continent and into the ground there.
So he sees oil and minerals as part of America's balance sheet.
And it's not just him.
This is what the Trump administration is all about.
Lucky Lutnik said it.
Scott Besant, who is a longtime associate of George Soros and Barack Obama.
That Scott Besant.
They're all saying the same thing.
They're all singing the same tune.
This is the plan for this Trump administration.
Not just to pump and dump the crypto stuff on us, but it's also to take the land, to take everything, and split it up amongst them.
Robber barons is what they are.
So, this article said, talking about the first 100 days, Donald Trump's Interior Secretary is making the case that oil, gas, and minerals in the vast federal lands, which they don't legitimately own, And waters that he is charged with overseeing should be viewed as part of America's balance sheet worth trillions of dollars.
By the way, sell off the water to a foreign corporation, right?
And that wouldn't be the first time they've done some of that.
Secretary Burgum plans to tell thousands of oil and gas executives gathered for an energy conference that the sale of federal timber grazing rights Mineral production, oil and gas and all the rest of the stuff.
And this is what really gets me angry.
You know, the whole Bundy thing was very important because it was not just people's lives at stake with what potentially could have turned into another one of these Waco situations or Ruby Ridge.
But it was also...
About the surface rights, the grazing rights, the water rights, and then timber rights, mining rights.
These are property rights that have already been given to people, sold, leased to them.
And the government, the Bureau of Land Management, they have been trying to manage these people off the land ever since.
Because they want to sell this, and they want to sell it to corporations who are then going to give them kickbacks.
You know, what's in it for them?
Well, a lot's in it for them.
It's a lot of corruption.
This is from Susan.
She said, actually, not from Susan.
It was her husband.
But, because he said, my wife and I watched you interview with Brian Reisinger.
And it sparked the desire to share some writings with you, hopefully as far and as wide as possibly.
He said, the first is a dissertation.
By Leonard Sharashkin, I think.
Leonard Sharashkin, a Russian-born graduate of the University of Missouri.
The following excerpt should be a sobering clue to the current circumstances.
He said, Russia has 18.8 million acres of family farms, which produce $14 billion worth of products per year.
Equivalent to over 50% of Russia's agricultural output.
And equivalent to 2.3% of the country's GDP. So think about that.
Half of their agricultural output is on family farms.
The U.S., on the other hand, has 27.5 million acres of lawns, which produce $30 billion per year for the lawn care.
I guess we'll be eating grass.
Hopefully we won't have the dangerous chemicals on that grass.
The weed suppressants and the glyphosates and stuff.
In the Vladimir region of Russia, gardeners spend on average 17 hours a week during the growing season tending their gardens.
Surveys from other regions...
Let's see.
I lost this.
I lost the rest of the email.
It was an excellent email.
And what he was talking about was what his family was involved in.
I wonder if I lost it or just moved it.
Hey, here it is.
Here it is.
I moved one of the pages in front of it.
I thought I had deleted it.
He says Americans on average now spend 32 hours a week watching TV. While the Russians are spending 17 hours a week doing their gardening.
In Russia, the National Statistics Agency collects and publishes volumes of data on family gardens.
In the U.S., the output of backyard food gardens and community gardens is not accounted for.
The USDA is not paying attention to it.
Let's hope that they never do, quite frankly.
This list of vast economic, social, and cultural differences between Russia and America could continue.
However, there is a striking similarity in how, during times of hardship, He said,
Leonid is known for his involvement in the English translation of a book series that was titled...
The Ringing Cedars of Russia.
The ideas conveyed in the series, along with the Orthodox Christian Renaissance, has created a very strong, independent community with extremely minimal contact with the government.
You hear that?
Parallel Society.
They have even been successful in having legislation passed exempting them from property tax.
A growing foundation of the U.S. is working in collaboration with the Russian communities to build their own And he said there's more about that at a website called deepsnowpress.com.
He said, and then he was talking about the nutrition and physical degeneration studies by Weston Price, which we've talked about before, the processed foods and the things that have happened in our society.
I thought that that was especially important.
Yeah, Dave and Sue.
Dave and Sue.
There we go.
It just had her name at the top of the email.
But that is very, very important.
And I think it is important for us to start getting outside of the system, and we'll talk more about that in terms of even getting outside of the financial system.
Very, very important.
Noel, another listener, a long-time correspondent and a listener going back to even when I was at Infowars.
He sent me a thing, and by the way, I can't view it.
He said, you might need a LinkedIn account to see this video.
I don't have a LinkedIn account.
I have been purged by them as well.
LinkedIn, Vimeo, YouTube, PayPal.
I mean, it's like, go on and on and on.
Spotify, you name it.
Persona non grata.
They will not restore any of this stuff.
So I can't see it.
But what he's talking about, and he's somebody who knows, he's involved in math.
That's his profession.
He's also worked with AI, as he's pointed out before.
He got a $6,000 server dedicated to examining and doing AI on an ecosystem.
And he said, excuse me, it's been very difficult for him.
He's feeling the impacts of this.
It has affected what he does directly.
He said, you know, chatbots are old news.
Now we're in the era of autonomous AI agents.
And I talked about this earlier this last week.
You know, the Pentagon working on AI agents for defense.
And so this is essentially giving them the ability to operate independently and to displace human workers.
You basically give them tasks to do right now with computers, but it's going to be expanding more and more.
And these AI agents can do a whole series of complicated tasks.
You know, think about a robot, but it could be a robot that is software, but it also is the type of thing that hardware robots will be doing.
He said, if you think that my job, whether it is a white-collar or blue-collar job, if you think that is safe, you're in for a shock.
And those people who think, my company would never do a mass layoff, or I'm very important, I'm a linchpin, or whatever, he said, just wait.
Until they're up against the moneyed Silicon Valley startups whose motto is, let's do it with as few humans as possible.
You know, we've already seen this type of displacement.
I was talking to Reisinger about the family farms and stuff.
His book, Land Rich and Cash Poor.
The fact that these organizations had not just big farms, big corporate farms to put out small farmers, but we've also seen that in all of the small businesses.
I mean, it used to be...
Go back and look at old pictures of when I grew up and everything was, you know, you had all kinds of business opportunities.
Even manufacturing opportunities were available that my dad and his family did.
But, you know, retail, it was all pretty much local and small shops.
All of them got pushed out of business, got pushed out of You know, shuttered 80s and 90s, I guess, is when Romney and his vulture capitalists started funding the big box retailers.
So he wound up with, like, you know, two office supply things and two hardware supply things, and they're all funded from...
From Wall Street.
So we're going to see that again.
We had the big box retailers that drove all of the mom and pop and independent retailers out of business on Main Street.
And Trump basically put the last nail in the coffin with his lockdowns for most people.
The few ones that could survive.
And of course, the one sector that was still vibrant was restaurants.
And so they were especially hard hit by what Trump did.
It was all a plan.
It was all a plan.
It wasn't accidental.
It wasn't coincidental.
It was a long-term plan.
And now what we're going to see after this onslaught of Wall Street big boxes, we're going to see the Silicon Valley big bots.
And so they're going to be having robots, or they're going to have physical robots, or they'll have software tasks that'll be done by these AI agents.
They will be the bots that are out there.
So it's something for you to think about.
You know, you need to think about how you're going to be independent of this system.
And it's kind of interesting, you know, if you look at what the Amish have been able to do and the Mennonites, I mean, we don't have to grow beards like them, but, you know, hey, there's nothing on beards, right?
But, you know, what they have done with their society is what we need to emulate.
And we need to look at that as a model.
And we can live perfectly fine lives apart from that.
And so we need to pay attention to that, and we need to start learning those kinds of skills that are going to give us independence to get out of their system.
If we are dependent on computers and other things like that, they're going to do a rug pull on you.
Absolutely.
And then finally, you have a comment here from Will.
He says, here we go again, another failed SpaceX launch.
This one to save the stranded astronauts, and that's really getting serious.
I mean, they're talking about how it's going to take them a very long time and a lot of therapy because they've been in this zero-gravity thing for so long.
You know, whenever they talk about putting people in space or sending somebody on a long space trip, they would always have this rotating thing to create artificial gravity because it just destroys your body.
Anyway, how can anyone of sound mind, he says, though, Believe that we went to the moon in 1969 with primitive technology.
Yet today, with all the high-tech advances that we've made, we can't even launch a basic rocket, not to mention the stranded folks in space.
I can't help but think about the 1969 moon landing with the threats of Ralph Cramden made to Alice on the Honeymooners.
To the moon, Alice!
But, you know, that's the way I feel about it.
I thought it was really strange that everything just abruptly stopped when we were watching it.
And, you know, now there's a lot of indicators that we never went.
Latest one is this company that says that they sent a probe up and landed on the movie.
It's just a very primitive probe.
And then everything went wrong and they lost it all.
It's like, yeah, how is it that we were able to send all these people up and we're able to get a vehicle up there and all the rest of the stuff?
And now here we are, you know.
60 years later, and we can't even get an unmanned probe up there to do anything.
How is that?
Yeah, none of it makes any sense, does it?
And you look at...
The other aspect of it is when he shot off that Starship, and it was much bigger engines than we had on these other ones.
So much so that it sent giant...
Chunks of concrete fly all the next community, the next town over, crashing and stuff.
Why is it that you didn't see that kind of stuff with the Saturn rockets and everything?
But I think the biggest thing was, back when I was at Infowars, there was a guy that they interviewed that came in, and he was an older guy.
He died just a few months after the interview.
But he was on the front line of mission control of Houston.
And he said, you know, they asked him, was it real?
He said, well, you know, there's a lot of times, most of the time, I didn't think it was.
But, you know, sometimes it did seem real, like with Apollo 13 and things like that.
But he goes, but then, you know, regardless of the real and unreal, the way it felt, and again, he was leaning towards it not being real, even though he was on the front lines.
And he said, but then the strangest thing was that when the program ended, They not only destroyed all these engines, but they made sure they destroyed all the plans.
They didn't want anybody to see the plans.
And folks, that is a dead giveaway.
Whether you're talking about Michael Mann or you're talking about the vaccine industry, you're talking about the CDC, when anybody is manic about hiding all the information, or just as last week, USAID, the head of USAID saying to everybody, get all your paperwork, burn it or destroy it.
You know, shred it.
Burn it.
And, you know.
When you look at that kind of stuff, it just tells you that they're lying to you.
It tells you that they're involved in criminal activity.
There's just no doubt about it.
That is the smoking gun.
Spumford, thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
Thank you.
And for the tip.
And DivClone.
Thank you as well.
He says, while Tesla does pay taxes in China, it is reported paying zero federal income tax in the U.S. Yes, exactly.
I got that article here.
I don't know if I'll get to it or not.
And, of course, it just dismissed.
As he went to the IRS, there was a lawyer that said, just go away.
They shoved this guy away.
It is pretty amazing, isn't it?
OctoSpoop.
It says, that is not government land.
That is we the people's land.
Government can hold no wealth nor own any property.
Everything in America is owned by Americans.
And that is one of the things that we're talking about with the Bundy Ranch.
The fact that under the Constitution, the government is not to own for its supports.
And that was what, you know, Clive and Bundy was doing a good job of educating people about that.
Except you had people like Glenn Beck spin it.
And then try to paint him as a sovereign citizen to endanger him.
It was just the most amazing thing to see that happen.
And they made it about other things, just like they made what was happening at Waco and Ruby Ridge.
They made that about other things as well.
But he was absolutely right.
The government...
These were property rights in the way the media would spend it.
They said, well, you think you own that?
You know, the Bundys think they own that.
No, they don't.
But they do have property rights.
There's surface rights, water rights and things like that, just like the miners and the lumberjacks did.
And those were property rights.
And I said at the time, I said, if you let them take those property rights from them, they will take the property rights that you have for your home.
And a couple years after that, we went up to Oregon.
And as we were driving around, there was this one neighborhood, and they had all these signs up.
And they said, stop the encroachment of the National Park.
The National Park was going to expand and go in and take the suburban homes of these people.
And I said, that's it.
They don't respect your property rights that you've had.
And that's part of what was going on with this.
This pipeline thing.
So they don't have a right to that.
And when these different territories became states, they were supposed to divvy it up in one way or the other.
They did at the beginning.
But then after Lincoln and that consolidation and corruption of power that we had, After that happened, they just kept all the land because they didn't bother with the Constitution, any of that stuff after that.
Marky Mark, thank you.
He says, the Saturn V plans are still on microfilm.
Only the paper plans are gone.
Well, it'd be interesting if somebody wants to maybe feed that into AI and say, would this work?
Would it get us there?
GDP 330 says they pump CO2 into greenhouses, yet it's toxic.
Climate change is just another lie, and it's a big one.
He said, we need to shop locally as much as possible and support local farmers.
I agree.
The cost of living is much lower, much, much lower in Russia.
Quotes of their wealth and inflated, worthless American dollars is misleading, says OctoSpook.
GDP330 says capitalism works just fine until governments get involved.
Then it turns into crony capitalism.
Trump handed trillions to Big Pharma in 2020. Syrian girl, sounds like those astronauts will be eating each other soon.
Anybody know how long their food and tech are supposed to last while they're lost in space?
I know.
When that first happened, I played the lost in space thing as a joke.
This is not going to be a joke much longer either.
I was just amazed that they would go through the mission, go through with the mission, with the Boeing ship having so many problems, leaking and everything else, and they barely made it there.
You know, they had a lot of new leaks that happened as they were doing it, but then they got concerned enough that they didn't want them to make the return trip on that, and so now they still can't get up there.
Well, we'll see what happens with it.
I hope they do get back safely.
We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at what happened with gold.
We hit a new record and a significant breakthrough at $3,000.
And yet, at the same time, you're seeing the crony capitalist technocrats around Trump continuing to push for a private...
Stablecoin.
The stablecoin thing is really taking off, and the Genius Act that I talked about yesterday has cleared another legislative hurdle on its way to becoming law.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Making sense.
Common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, Jason Barker says there's tons of small family cemeteries in the Mark Twain National Forest and on Fort Leonard Wood.
That tells me that all the federal land was once private property.
Well, yeah, and of course you look around here.
It wasn't just that they had areas that were, it was out west that I was talking about, where they had territories, and then when they made them states, they should have turned it over to private property.
But of course, when you look east, people had been living in the land for quite some time in the area that became the Smoky Mountain National Park.
Areas there like Cades Cove and things like that, the communities that you go through, it always bothers me.
They stole that land from those people and drove them off.
They were living there.
And they confiscated that land and drove them off.
I like the park, but I don't like that.
Always bothered me.
OctoSpook.
Most cattle ranchers here in New Mexico.
Small, private-owned ranches with leased BLM public lands around them.
I hope they don't make a move on them.
Wonderful beef.
It makes Walmart beef look like the poison crap it is.
And Brian and Deb McCartney.
The Donner Party Goes to Space.
Talking about the stranded astronauts.
Now, that's one thing, if you ever have to wait at a restaurant, you know, they'll say the night party, your table is ready or whatever.
I like to always give them the Donner.
Yeah, my last name is Donner.
Donner party, your table is ready.
You go, I was starving.
We were actually in Tahoe once with the boys who went out on Thanksgiving, and we had a timeshare at the time, and they had a timeshare thing.
So we went at kind of the last minute.
And we had a really good time.
Took them on snowmobiles and things like that.
There's always a lot of snow there.
And we left, and the next day they got hit with this massive storm that came in very rapidly.
And several people died that were out doing recreational things like we'd been doing.
I mean, that place is just amazing, the amount of snow that they get up there where the Donner Party was.
Let's talk a little bit about what happened with gold.
Gold futures hit $3,000.
As I looked at it last night, towards the end of the day, it just went straight up.
I didn't look to see what it was this morning.
Again, I'm not sitting there like Scrooge McDuck looking at ticker takes, you know.
Anyway, gold price at a new record high on safe haven bids.
Everybody is getting very concerned because of the volatility that Trump is creating, as well as the tariffs.
Also looking at inflation and debt and all the rest of this stuff.
All these things, all the fundamentals are there.
That's why I said, you know, when all of a sudden gold pulled back after Trump was elected and crypto surged for it, I had that Yukon Cornelius commercial.
I said, you know, this is a Trump euphoria.
And it's not going to be long-lived.
And it was a good time to buy then.
I think it went back to like $2,500 or something like that.
Gold price still will have plenty of potential after breaking through this $3,000 barrier, they said.
The commodity team at a company, I don't know if I'm pronouncing this correctly, Mockery.
Led by Marcus Garvey, updated their 2025 gold price forecast yesterday, and they now see the precious metal pushing up to a high of $3,500 by the third quarter.
Well, if that were to happen, that would be in less than a year, going up about a sixth or 17%.
So they're not thinking that anything is going to get much better with the economy or more stable either.
Yesterday, it went up like 2.5% in just one day.
That's really unusual.
I mean, we're not talking about a cryptocurrency here.
We're talking about a commodity.
So they also see gold being driven by the deteriorating outlook of the U.S. government's growing debt.
The Congressional Budget Office projections for the budget deficit will deteriorate relative to the current law with tariff revenues, savings achieved by the by Doge, supposedly, and potential cuts to Medicaid will be insufficient to fully offset the extension of Tax Cuts and potential cuts to Medicaid will be insufficient to fully offset the extension of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, potentially adding one and a Gold prices are likely to remain historically elevated.
Darby's team also expects Gold's rally to be supercharged if the Trump administration challenges the Federal Reserve's independence by pressuring it to cut rates.
He is all about cutting the rates to the extent.
That, you know, he pushed the Fed to do it the last time through, and Slenty was pretty certain he was going to be able to do it this time.
We'll see what happens with it.
He's also, Garvey's also bullish on silver.
The analysts there increased their forecast for silver to $33.50 by the third quarter, up from the previous forecast of $31 an ounce.
However, he still predicts an elevated gold to silver ratio of nearly 92 points, which is very unusual as well.
As I said yesterday, you know, these analysts are looking at it.
Said, you know, usually it's a fight between gold and the dollar, and one goes up, the other one goes down, but now they both have been going up.
But even with a strong dollar, gold was going up.
Same thing with bonds.
You know, the bond market was strong, but even with that, the dollar went up, and so everybody's scratching their heads and saying, what's going on?
Well, I think it's just this chaos, and I think the chaos is only going to get worse.
Throughout the Trump administration.
The S&P 500, meanwhile, closed in correction territory.
In other words, it was more than 10% off of a recent high.
Stocks tumbled again on Trump's tariff threats.
And as I said at the beginning of the program, he's now threatening Europe.
On alcohol, it's going to put tariffs on wine and other things like that.
So I said, yeah, they can just do a Trump drinking game.
Every time he says tariff, they take a drink and they're going to be totally drunk.
Unprecedented gold flows from London to New York.
And people are looking at this again.
And remember, several months ago that Tony first talked about that.
And it was largely ignored by people.
He said, this is really kind of strange.
Not really sure what's happening with it.
Maybe it is a tariffs now as this has continued and continued to escalate.
A lot of people believe that it is about the tariffs.
And so, these people, I don't know when that started when he was talking about it.
I think it was back in November, you know, right after the election.
These guys who were on the inside track, like Pelosi, they knew right then that Trump was going to push real hard for a lot of tariffs.
And so they wanted to get the gold in, so they didn't have to pay tariff fees on the gold that they brought in from London.
As they pointed out, the London market is predominantly a physical metal trading market.
New York is really a futures, paper, and derivative-driven market.
Nevertheless, in New York, they want to make sure they got the physical stuff there in case people demand it.
And they want to make sure they get it in so they don't have to pay tariffs on it.
So they said the amount of physical gold that's been moving from London to New York is staggering.
2,000 plus tons in December alone.
Now think about that.
We're looking at all the gold that was in Fort Knox.
You know, that was, if I recall correctly, I think that was like 4,000 tons of gold in Fort Knox.
We're talking about half the amount of gold that's in Fort Knox.
In just one month, in December.
And that's about a quarter of what the U.S. government owns.
So that they moved in.
Pretty amazing, if you stop and think about it.
And then it gets even more amazing.
He said, almost every single flight was booked across the Atlantic with all the shipping logistics providers.
So you couldn't even get metal on a flight because they were so booked up for the next two to three months.
Because they wanted to get 2,000 tons across, and they did that evidently in December.
And then it gets even stranger.
He said in London, the over-the-counter gold market typically is backed by 400-ounce gold bars, a brick, essentially, that you typically see.
He says, but the thing is that the Commodity Markets Exchange in the U.S. and New York, they work in 49 purity kilobars.
The bottom line is it's a smaller bar, so a 100-ounce bar instead of a 400-ounce bar.
And so not only were they moving the equivalent in December, the equivalent of like half of the gold in Fort Knox, but they had to send it to Switzerland, have it melted down and reformed into not 400-ounce bars, but 100-ounce bars.
I hope nobody was...
Doing some monkey business with that stuff.
Who knows?
I'm sure that they're paying attention to that.
So they had to not only ship it, but they had to reformat it, so to speak.
It's not a hard disk.
It was hard money that they had to reformat.
That's what you do.
You can reformat your hard disk, but when it's hard money, you've got to melt it.
Put it in another form.
A lot of these traders that are short futures on the commodity exchange on COMEX are trying to build up as much physical inventory as they possibly can before tariffs come in.
Just another example of all the chaos and wasted effort and work.
That Trump is causing everybody.
Going back to Ford, for example.
Let's get all the parts and the engine parts that are over there in Canada that we normally store.
We've got to find places to store them here in America.
We've got to bring them up.
This is doing this everywhere.
People are trying to do that.
And it's not to protect a pickup.
It's not a scalpel.
It's not even a chainsaw.
What are you doing?
He's just throwing in a grenade.
Into the air.
Just blowing everything up.
It truly is amazing.
And all these people working so hard and spending so much money just to avoid these punitive taxes that he's going to throw out there like a hand grenade.
Crypto traders, though, are prepping to buy as tether activity hits a six-month high.
They know what's going on with the tariffs.
They're bringing the gold back with that.
You look at the stablecoin nonsense that's out there.
Yeah, don't tell me it's a stable coin if it's tied to a fiat currency like the dollar.
But the game with all of that is this genius act and the fact that they are going to prop up their bond market using these stable coins.
That's the game these crooks are running.
Just amazing.
Activity for Tether has hit a six-month high.
A lot of that's this Genius Act stuff.
The Senate Banking Committee has also now advanced the Genius Stablecoin bill.
And this is despite the banking industry pushing back.
You know, yesterday when I read that to you, I said, look at this.
I got three different things that they're talking about here.
The very first thing that they talk about, well, we'll make sure that the banks are included.
And it's like, because the banks, if they know what's going on, They know that CBDC is going to be the end of them.
They know that the Genius Act will be the end of them.
And so the banking industry pushed back against this.
They were not fooled by that.
What they said was, well, with the proper regulation and auditing and that type of thing, we'll let Silicon Valley do this stuff, and we'll also let the banks still do it.
And they put the banks first.
They were number one, and number two was a...
It was the big tech.
And the banks said, no, no, no, no, we don't want that.
So the U.S. Senate Banking Committee still elected to advance the Genius Act in an 18-6 vote.
It wasn't even close, folks.
This was as the banking industry itself was appealing to this Senate Banking Committee.
And this is the term that they use.
They said stablecoins will disintermediate banks.
It's going to make them go away.
The analogy that I would use is that the banks are going to go the way of the video store after streaming came online.
Right?
And they understand that.
And they understand that if they put all this stuff and you're going to stream your digital coins and everything online, the banks are going to go away.
They tried to use their influence.
Obviously, they don't have any left.
Even the Senate Banking Committee, 18 to 6, voted for this genius stablecoin thing.
It is a genius idea to make these people even richer.
Maybe they'll become trillionaires.
Who knows?
According to an article from American Banker, The bill requires 60 votes to pass in the Senate, meaning that at least seven Democrats will have to vote with Republicans to push through the act.
They said this stablecoin bill breaks the status quo by green-lighting big tech companies and other commercial conglomerates to issue their own stablecoins.
But it looks like increasingly they're lining up to make that happen and to tokenize everything.
Part of what they want to do is, in terms of monetizing and quote-unquote putting to work our natural resources, that they now act as if it's their own little personal piggy bank, one of the ways that they're going to put that out there is to tokenize it, to make a digital representation of these physical assets.
Shortly after the bill was introduced in the U.S. Senate, Federal Reserve Bank Governor Christopher Waller said that non-banks should be allowed to issue stablecoins.
You see, the idea that these people had that were attacking Thomas Massey, these MAGA nuts who know nothing, they said, well, you know, his end the Fed is a bad thing because if we end the Fed, we're going to wind up with CBDC. It's like, what do you think the CB stands for in CBDC? Federal Reserve.
Do you think that the Federal Reserve has been cut out of this thing?
No, no, no.
They left themselves an N on all of this stuff as well.
No, the Federal Reserve is an evil institution.
It needs to be shut down.
Ron Paul was right about that.
Thomas Massey was right about that.
These people in the MAGA thing are absolutely clueless about everything.
And they don't understand how their hero, Donald Trump, is setting them up to be stabbed in the back.
How he's redesigning the financial system so that he and his crypto buddies can become trillionaires.
It's just disgusting to see this stuff rolling out.
Over-collateralized stablecoin issuers are collectively...
The 18th largest buyers of U.S. government debt in the world.
These stablecoins buy more U.S. Treasury notes than Germany, South Korea, many other countries.
The 18th largest, and it's going to become even larger.
And that's why this is happening.
The stablecoin thing, they will buy up the Treasury debt as, you know...
Ray Dalio, I quoted him as saying, he's a hedge fund billionaire.
He said, the problem is the debt.
We're getting so much debt.
How are we going to service this debt?
And when it becomes such a large percentage of our GDP, people out there are not stupid.
They don't want to buy a debt that you're not going to be able to service.
So what do they do?
These guys like Lucky Lutnik and Scott Bessent, who are very smart and clever, they say, well, let's create this thing over here.
That is like a derivative, you know, like the securitization of the mortgages or something like that.
Let's create this artificial abstraction over here.
And then we'll have it buy our treasury debt that nobody in their right mind wants to buy anyway.
Germany doesn't want it.
South Korea doesn't want it.
So we'll sell it to stablecoin and tether.
That is being run by Lucky Lutnik.
He's got a major interest in it.
He's the custodian for it.
He's got a major capital involvement in it and all the rest of the stuff.
The Genius Act.
Signals an impending merger of the traditional financial system with stablecoins.
The Federal Reserve has run this Ponzi scheme longer than they typically are able to run these things.
And so they're going to have to redesign the financial system.
They're going to have to relabel it.
They're not going to call it now CBDC, but they'll have the same functions as CBDC, and they will merge this with the stablecoin.
It'll still give them the ability...
To see and control all of the money.
And it is just a stepping stone to a global financial currency.
This is why you want to get out of this stuff as much as you can.
The U.S. government can use stablecoins as a sponge to soak up inflation and to protect the dollar's status as the global reserve currency.
You see, they've been using these ETFs and these derivatives and securitized mortgages.
They've been using that to cover up bad assets like they did during the mortgage thing until, guess what?
Eventually, though, it blew up, didn't it?
So who knows if they're going to be successful in this.
But they always create these derivatives and stuff for what purpose?
To manipulate things.
When we looked at the ETFs that were being created by BlackRock and others, the purpose of that was manipulation of Bitcoin, just like the purpose of ETFs for gold and silver, the purpose of that is to manipulate the value of the real thing.
They were manipulating the value of real estate with these derivative securitized mortgages.
So all of these tokenized scams are about them creating some new instrument to manipulate.
The real thing that is out there.
And so now these guys are going to apply that to the federal debt.
I have no idea if they're going to be successful with that or not.
I know they're going to make a lot of money.
Are they going to destroy the country for the rest of us?
Look, this stuff is a gamble.
And it could easily blow up in their face like the mortgage stuff did.
Who knows?
Go to davidknight.gold.
I'll take you to Tony.
You can buy small or large amounts of gold or silver.
You can do it on a regular basis with Wolfpack.
I don't know anybody else that does that.
I've done business with Tony for a very long time.
If you want to get into Bitcoin, he doesn't do the other crypto stuff, but if you want to get into Bitcoin, he can get you there between Bitcoin and gold without fees.
So you can go from one way to the other to get into that.
But I look at gold.
Gold is not gambling.
I look at all of the stocks.
I look at all the crypto stuff.
I look at that as a form of gambling.
Some of them are riskier than others.
When we went to Vegas for the Video Software Dealers Association, they gave us a certificate to go to the Tropicana at the time.
And so we were curious to see what it was.
And so Karen and I go there, and we walk in, and we're obviously like tourists.
We're looking around.
Oh, look at this.
And we're just kind of, and this woman who was there at the roulette wheel, not roulette wheel, it's whatever they call it.
It's like this vertical spinning wheel, you know, like Wheel of Fortune or something.
And she goes, come here, come here.
I was like, what?
You know, she says, take that.
Put it on, she said, this is, you know, I don't even know if that was her, I don't remember if that was the one that she was doing, but she said, you know, this one's got pretty good odds on it compared to the rest of them, but put it down, and she said, win or lose, leave.
You know, put this down.
Maybe you can convert it to some cash, maybe it's just going to go away.
But she said, don't play it.
Because, you know, the longer you play, the more certain it is that you're going to lose your money.
So we did that, and we lost.
But again, I don't like to gamble.
There's different, just like in that casino, there's different games have different odds.
Some of them, the odds are really long that you're going to win anything.
And so that's the way it is with some of these investments.
But I don't see gold as gambling.
I see gold as fire insurance.
Because you've got people like Trump and Lucky Lutnik and Scott Besant who are financial arsonists.
They're trying to burn our economy and our civilization down.
And so I'm looking for some fire insurance.
So again, you can go to davidknight.gold.
That'll take you to Tony Ardaman.
We're going to take a quick break.
And when we come back, let's see what is next on the list.
Oh, we're going to talk about anti-Netanyahuism.
It's a real thing.
You know, Trump has just decided that he can...
He can not only ban guns if he wants to, or by executive order, he can actually change somebody's ethnicity.
He just made Chuckie Schumer into Palestinian.
We're going to talk about that.
That was actually a very useful analogy for people to understand what real anti-Semitism and fake anti-Semitism is really about.
So we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression.
In our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.
The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
Tomorrow it will be something else.
*Sings* *Sings* *Sings* *Sings* *Sings* *Sings* *Sings* *Sings* *Sings* *Sings* *Sings*
Liberty, it's your movie.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well...
A penny saved is a penny earned.
Though, that's gotten tougher since they've stopped making them.
Maybe it's time to start saving a different type of coin.
Such as the new David Knight Show supporter commemorative coin.
Saving these coins earns support for independent media.
Featuring striking bas-relief with bold raised details and premium painted accents.
It's not just a trinket, but a statement, a declaration.
A way to show you refuse to be controlled by the establishment.
It's a limited run of just 100 coins.
So, much like the penny, when they're gone, they're gone.
They silence independent voices.
They censor the truth.
But you can stand with real journalism and own a piece of the resistance.
These coins saved is The David Knight Show sustained.
Available now at thedavidknightshow.com.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
And again, I want to thank Ryan for the love of the road.
Great job with that coin.
I really appreciate that.
And that is...
One thing that you can invest in as insurance, to keep the show going.
DGA, thank you.
He says, David, gold will preserve your wealth through a collapse.
Silver will be your bartering tool during the collapse.
Yeah, that's right.
Of course, you also get gold in some smaller forms, too.
I like some of the stuff that Tony has with the Wise Wolf thing, where you have the gold paper things that gets it down to, it's got it woven into the money like a paper dollar or something, except it has intrinsic value, unlike the paper dollar.
Note, Lucky Lutnik is behind tether.
Yeah, he is tethered to tether, that's for sure.
He's also...
Put together a lot of these pump and dump meme coin things as well, like Trump has been involved in.
Angry Tiger.
Good to see you there.
Angry Tiger report in Knights of the Storm.
The stock market has been in shambles this week.
When that happens, there's a knee-jerk reaction.
Investors tend to go into the dollar for safety.
The last two weeks, that has not been the case.
People don't want our dollar, and they don't consider it safe haven anymore.
Now, look at gold.
He said, the simple fact that the people in the stock market are no longer going to the dollar is a very tall sign for the relative strength as it is dropping.
Matt Bradford, the dollar is dying.
We are where the Brits were in the late 60s and early 70s.
The British sterling was the world reserve currency, and it was a sinking one, and worldwide everybody knew it.
Yeah, I agree.
Jason Barker, good to see you, Jason, again.
Knights of the Storm and Foxhole Report.
So the dollar is on a ventilator and remdesivir.
We're getting real close to the mark of the beast stuff.
I think consolidation of food is a part of it.
When you get hungry enough, you will take the mark.
So you can use the CBDC to buy some food.
Better start your gardens now.
That's right.
Knowledge of how to do that, the ability to do that, now is the time to learn that.
And as I was saying, The other day to Brian Reisinger, I think it was his name, the author of the book Land Rich and Cash Poor, I said one of the key resources, talking about doing innovative things to keep farmers going, I said one of the things that they really can and should do is offer their service, and some of them do, offer their services to help people get up to speed faster about how to grow things.
I've talked to numerous people who have done that.
I need to get a hold of that guy that's down, I think, in...
Arkansas, Louisiana.
I talked to him and he'd learned this way to grow food that was very, very productive.
A guy, a farmer in Zimbabwe, learned how to do it.
He was having difficulty getting good yields using the kind of Western, you know, big ag tactics that were highly mechanized and a lot of fertilizer and things like that.
And he was a Christian and he went out into...
The jungle there, and he's looking around at how vibrant everything was.
He goes, there's got to be a way that we can grow food without doing these tactics.
And he just prayed.
He said, God, show me how to do this in a way that is more natural, doesn't require all of this stuff that is sustainable.
Because he couldn't sustain it.
It was too expensive.
He's having to buy these supplies.
And he did get shown how to do it.
God helped him with that.
And then when the Marxists took over, he said the reaction of some of the farmers was to fight the Marxists.
He said most of them died.
Others said we're just going to leave.
They left.
He stayed.
And when they came in, guess what?
These people didn't know anything about farming.
They're Marxist revolutionaries, and the other people that were there that didn't own farms, they didn't know anything about it, so everybody's starving.
And he decided that what he was going to do was stay there and show them how to grow food.
And he became a missionary.
So he showed them how to grow food, and he showed them Christ.
And then he started, he was very successful doing both of those, and he then talked to this guy who lives somewhere down in the southeast, and I have to try to find him and talk to him again.
He has classes on how to do it.
He showed this guy how to do it, and this guy has classes on how to do it.
That's an important thing for us to learn at this point in time.
Mark Bender, bought a coin.
Well, thank you.
Appreciate that.
Charles Truesdell, thank you so much for the tip.
He said, Dave, we've been listening to The High Wire for years now.
The information gleaned from the show is partially responsible for my mental paradigm shift and one of the reasons I chose not to vaccinate my children.
Historically, he's had some questionable characters on from time to time, but always seemed balanced.
With McCullough last week and Dr. Richard Bartlett yesterday, I have concerns.
I do too.
And I've interviewed Del Bigtree and I had a lot of respect for him and he was very good with that.
But, you know, he does get money from, you know, the same tree that RFK Jr. is there and it's part of that.
I don't know what's going on with that.
And you would look at Peter McCullough.
I saw these kinds of changes happening there with Alex and with Mike Adams when I was there.
Same kind of stuff that's happened into Peter McCullough.
You know, just decided they're going to start selling ludicrous lies in order to panic people and to make money.
The selling of them supplies.
Peter McCullough stood up and said some really good things at the beginning of this, and I've had a lot of good things to say about Dr. Peter McCullough in the past.
But then after he created this company and started selling stuff, and he paid a big price for it, too, with his medical practice, I believe.
But after he created this company, he's...
Been off the charts in terms of crazy lies and all the stuff that he's now selling about how bird flu came from a USDA lab in Georgia.
Nonsense like that.
And it won't do any good if we do the biosecurity measures because the mallard ducks will just give them to him again.
It's like, what are you talking about?
The mallard ducks are not dying.
It's just totally illogical.
Matt Bradford, I'm sitting on $10,000 of silver I purchased in 2010. I wonder how much it's worth today.
Back in September, it was worth $16,700.
I know that's not the case now.
I don't really keep track of the price of silver.
We have a little bit of it, but not enough that I sit there and watch any of this stuff, gold, silver, anything.
I don't really keep up with it.
I mean, I do for the news.
And from that standpoint, it's really more looking at what these people are trying to pull on us in terms of resetting the financial system and pushing us into this digital slavery.
Zoxovoxas.
Gardens will be designated as climate change accelerators and banned.
PCR tests for gardens, imminent killing.
The chicken is the beginning of that.
Yep, that's...
A period of time.
I mean, they're already in the UK. They're already going in and hassling people over their small farms, over even their backyard chickens.
Let's talk about what's going on with free speech and so-called anti-Semitism, which is really anti-Netanyahu-ism.
This article, and this article is also on the Jerusalem Post, many, many outlets picked up this poll that just recently came out.
Seventy percent of Israelis want Netanyahu to resign.
So are they anti-Semitic?
If they don't support the policies of the political entity that we call Israel, that's anti-Semitism according to the Trump administration, and according to many state GOPs, that's anti-Semitism.
Israel's war policies or their political policies, or you criticize them for buying and corrupting our politicians, well then, that's anti-Semitism, and you need to be punished somehow.
They'll figure it out.
Israelis want Benjamin Netanyahu to say, sorry, go away, writes the Atlantic.
But again, Jerusalem Post had this same story, essentially, and many others did.
A survey released this week.
By the Israel Democracy Institute, found a staggering 87% of Israelis think the prime minister should take responsibility for the events of October the 7th.
By the way, so did Shin Bet, the Israeli security agency.
They did a lot of mea culpas in it, but they also pointed the finger at Netanyahu and some of his actions there.
73% want him to resign either now or after the Gaza war.
Since October 7th, the Israeli public has consistently told posters that it wants Netanyahu gone, a preference that is held through every twist and every turn of the war, and has, if anything, intensified over time.
And, of course, if you go back and you look at 2009, Ron Paul said at the time, That Hamas is being aided by Israel.
You know, Hamas, if you look at the history, you'll find out that Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel because they wanted Hamas to counteract Yasser Arafat.
And you say, well, yeah, that was better then and it served its purpose, but we didn't want Hamas to do this.
So then, we as Americans say, well...
We have such a good system.
We're going to impose this on the world.
We're going to invade Iraq and teach people how to be Democrats.
We want free elections.
So we encourage the Palestinians to have a free election.
They do, and they elect Hamas.
So we first, indirectly and directly through Israel, help establish Hamas.
Then we have election.
Then Hamas becomes dominant, so we have to kill him.
You know, it just doesn't make sense.
Well, actually, there was some more strategy to it than that.
When they made this calculation, they said, well, Hamas is even more radical, which will make them even more of an obvious target, because what we really want is the land, right?
We don't have an excuse to get the land.
Netanyahu and his allies received only 48.4% of the vote in late 2022. Still, the Israeli leader did not seek to unite a polarized population by pivoting to the center.
And by the way, when they say, and his allies.
They mean the other political parties there that he formed a coalition with.
His particular vote total was way down from that.
So he cobbled together a sectarian coalition with unpopular extremist constituencies, far-right, messianic settlers, and ultra-Orthodox.
On core issue after issue, Netanyahu has been the prime minister for the 30%.
Take the ceasefire deal that is currently in limbo in Gaza.
Polls consistently show some 70% of Israelis want the arrangement to continue until all the hostages are free.
But, in its coalition, Netanyahu is beholden to the radical minority that wants not only to restart the war, but also to ethnically cleanse Gaza in order to repopulate it with Jewish communities.
In other words, the same radical minority folks in Israel that is the radical minority that is controlling Trump in America.
You've got a small radical minority in Israel that is controlling the Israeli government and that is also controlling the American government.
Isn't that interesting?
A radical minority in Israel controlling both the Israeli and the American government.
Controlling Trump.
Because that is what he wants.
And so, you know, as we look at this, I've said all along, so what is Israel?
Is Israel ethnic?
Is Israel religious?
Is Israel prophetic?
Is Israel political?
Well, pretty much what the Trump administration is doing with its suppression of free speech, that is on the basis of political Israel.
Netanyahu.
What they're calling anti-Semitism is anti-Netanyahuism, which 70% of Israelis are anti-Netanyahu.
And yet, if you push back against this, Trump and his people will, on behalf of the people who fund them and pay them and order them around, will take action against you.
For example, Chuckie Schumer was pushing back.
And Trump just changed his ethnicity to Palestinian.
Blame the Democrats.
And Schumer is a Palestinian as far as I'm concerned.
You know, he's become a Palestinian.
He used to be Jewish.
He's not Jewish anymore.
He's a Palestinian.
Okay.
See, if you disagree with him on politics, then, you know, if you're Jewish, that means that you're now not a Jew if you don't agree with Netanyahu on politics.
And if you're not a Jew, and you disagree with Netanyahu on politics, now you are anti-Semitic racist.
I've been called all these different names by people, and it doesn't bother me anymore when somebody calls me something that I know I'm not.
And we need to not sit back and be quiet.
Well, these people shut down, take over our government and shut down our Constitution and our free speech.
In January 2023, Netanyahu's coalition announced the first major policy initiative, a sweeping overhaul of Israel's judicial system.
That would dramatically disempower the country's Supreme Court.
This extraordinary reordering of Israeli democracy was not conceived through a public debate or a brokered consensus, but rather produced by a conservative think tank and rammed through the parliament on a narrow party-line vote.
Polls found that the plan was opposed by two-thirds of the Israeli public, in other words, about 70%.
And this is one of the reasons why, you know, he, as Gerald Slenty has said, you know, when all else fails, they take you to war.
You look at, you know, when they have economic issues, they take you to war.
When they have popularity issues, they take you to war.
The prime minister's determination to thwart the Israeli majority has also affected personnel decisions at the highest level.
November 5th, 2024, he fired his defense minister.
Gallant.
Polls previously found that Gallant was the most popular elected politician in Israel.
But the former army general had opposed the judicial overhaul, rejected Jewish settlement in Gaza.
Does that include, like, the Trump casino, even?
Called for the territory to be returned to non-Hamas Palestinian governance, pushed for an earlier ceasefire deal, and repeatedly pressed to draft the ultra-Orthodox into the Israeli Defense Forces.
So Gallant represented all of the consensus positions of Israeli society, and that's why he had to go.
These are not cherry-picked incidental issues.
They are the fundamental fault lines in Israeli politics.
And so, when you look at Trump, he's made it clear that he doesn't have any interest in the Second Amendment in principle.
He doesn't have any interest in free speech in principle either.
Because we're losing a lot of people because of the Internet.
And we have to do something.
We have to go see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what's happening.
We have to talk to them, maybe in certain areas, closing that Internet up in some way.
Somebody will say, oh, freedom of speech, freedom of speech.
These are foolish people.
We have a lot of foolish people.
And I think you should get a one-year jail sentence if you do anything to desecrate the American flag.
Now, people will say, oh, it's unconstitutional.
Those are stupid people.
Those are stupid people that say that.
Yeah, stupid to support the Constitution that he's for to uphold, isn't it?
Maybe he was saying that first part there about these are foolish people.
He's saying that as he's standing in front of his Make America Great Again.
You want to make America great again?
You start by going back to the Constitution and having the rule of law, but respecting the principles that that rule of law was based on.
Donald Trump doesn't have any connection at all to what made America great.
He despises what made America great.
So the last American vagabond tweeted that out and said this free speech back in 2025, the Trump administration is no different.
He says, why are you surprised?
Because he's been saying this for a very long time.
He said that you're stupid or you're foolish if you support free speech.
We just had Tom Homan about this protester that they wanted to deport.
And his response to that, he says, free speech is...
Has limitations.
No, it doesn't.
No, it doesn't.
If you infringe on the Second Amendment, that's prohibited.
And you want to put limitations on free speech?
You want to make it illegal?
People criticizing a foreign government?
Seriously?
No, the Bill of Rights is there, Homan, to put limitations on you.
People like you.
It's not there to limit our free speech.
Our speech is not a privilege that you grant or Trump grants.
It's there because of our humanity.
And the Constitution is there to put limits on you so that you don't infringe on these things that we possess by being human.
You're not to treat us like animals, to treat us like some B.F. Skinner experiment.
To say that we don't have dignity and freedom.
That's what these kinds of people want to do.
And of course, this is a disease, folks.
This censorship disease on the right is an epidemic portion.
It's spreading faster than any imaginary virus they can come up with.
It's infecting all of the GOP. Here's Tommy Tuberville talking about it.
Yeah, here we are.
...of education.
We have K-12, and we have higher ed.
We've got to treat both of them different.
But when it comes to protesters, we've got to make sure we treat all of them the same.
Send them to jail.
Free speech is great, but hateful, hate, free speech is not what we need in these universities, and they don't need to be doing things that they're preaching from Hamas about anti-sentimentism.
Senator...
He can't even say the word.
I like cinnamon.
Who's talking about anti-cinnamonism?
Whatever it is, okay?
No, it's anti-Netanyahuism.
He says, we don't want to have this hateful speech.
That guy...
It is the mirror image of all of these leftist radicals who have been coming after us.
I don't like your speech.
So your speech is hateful.
And taking it down.
We can't have people saying things that we don't like.
Supporting policies and governments that we don't like.
Protests are great, he says.
Well, they're not just great.
They're specifically protected in the Constitution.
These people who are all about, oh, yeah, we were protesting on January the 6th.
You know what?
They're no better than Biden.
They really aren't.
And they're going to start doing this.
They've got a different set of things that they want to punish you for.
It's disgusting what the Republicans are doing now.
Tulsi Gabbard has canceled an appointment of an Israeli critic after the Israeli lobby complains.
And so, you know, this is a small minority.
Of a foreign political entity has basically hijacked our government as well.
Director of National Intelligence Telsey Gabbard's attempt to appoint Israel critic Daniel Davis for the position of Deputy D&I was scuttled at the last minute on Wednesday in response to complaints from the Israel lobby in their mouthpieces.
This is Information Liberation.
A publication called Jewish Insider put out a hit piece lobbying for Davis to be canceled.
Then the Anti-Defamation League picked up on it, and Mark Levin, the grating one.
His speech is always very grating to listen to, to listen to what he is saying.
Daniel Davis said that U.S. support for Israel's war in Gaza was a strategic and a moral mistake.
Yeah, I think he's right.
Then Mark Levin.
Wow, so bizarre.
Fighting anti-Semitism like never before, but installing this guy.
Uh-huh.
Yeah.
Well, he had, and then ADL. He undermined U.S. support for Israel's right to defend itself and blatantly denies the grave threat the Iranian regime poses to global blah, blah, blah.
No.
He had told people the truth about the Afghan war.
He went there when McChrystal was in charge of it, and he exposed the lies and the fraud about that.
He is a senior fellow at Defense Priorities.
They were called isolationists by Jewish Insider.
I doubt that he is isolationist.
I mean, I'm isolationist.
They throw all these different invectives at people.
Well, he's anti-vaxxer.
No, he's not really anti-vaxxer.
I'm anti-vaxxer.
Isolationist.
No, he's not really isolationist.
I'm really isolationist.
America first.
But, you know, it comes right down to it.
He was actually right.
They criticized him on Jewish Insider.
They said, Davis, a retired military officer, early critic of the Afghanistan war.
He was right about that.
He called for U.S. support for the war, and Ghazi called it a mistake.
He said, on a practical level, we give away enormous leverage and credibility globally to hold anyone accountable for acts of wanton violence.
We not merely turn a blind eye to it, we cheer it on.
We supply the means to do more, he said.
On a moral level, this is a stain on our character, and as a nation, as a culture, that will not soon go away.
He's absolutely right.
It is a stain on the character and the culture of many Christians who support this kind of stuff as well, what is being done in Gaza and Palestine.
He talked about the ethnic cleansing of Gaza.
He compared Gaza to a prison.
And he said, let me say, before anyone else brings this up, to those who would scream, October the 7th, let me reply, the history of this conflict did not begin on that day.
Yeah.
Go back to 2009. Take a look at what Shin Bet just said.
So, someone who knows him wrote a response to this and said, I've had the pleasure of interviewing him countless times.
Kelly Vlahos, I guess, who writes in Responsible Statecraft.
He said, I've had the pleasure of interviewing him countless times since 2009 when on active duty...
He sent a report to Congress and published an article excoriating the Afghanistan war generals, including the much-vaunted Stanley McChrystal, for essentially lying to the American people.
In 2009, he had just returned from an inspection tour of the country and was pretty much shocked when what he saw there didn't line up with what the military was telling Congress and the media here.
He said, instead, I witnessed the absence of success on virtually every level.
He said, looking at his article, he said at the time, Davis said, when it comes to deciding what matters are worth plunging our nation into war and which are not, our senior leaders owe it to the nation and to the uniformed members to be candid, graphically if necessary, and telling them what's at stake and how expensive potential success is likely to be.
U.S. citizens and their elected representatives can decide if the risk to blood and treasure is worth it.
That is the very essence of civilian control of the military.
The American people deserve better than what they've gotten from their senior uniformed leaders over the last number of years.
Simply telling the truth would be a good start.
In this article, the guy commented, he said, well, the truth is out there.
And our military and civilian leadership tried to keep the truth from us until they couldn't anymore.
He says, this is exactly what Tulsi Gabbard said she wanted.
A refreshing, dramatic shift from the status quo, which had become sclerotic, secretive, and punishing of dissent.
But, of course, it is punishing dissent now.
And it is punishing anybody who's not a slavish...
Devotee to Netanyahu and his radical minority that only has 30% support in its own country.
But yet, that's called anti-Semitism, to shut down debate.
They're no different from the left.
The left goes around, what do they do?
Whatever the policy, they just scream at you, you're racist, racist, racist.
And that's the same policy that the Zionists are doing as well.
Even RFK Jr. Anti-Semitism is now a public health crisis and all the rest of this nonsense.
So, as that's happening, yet another person has been purged out of the Trump administration.
Adam Baylor.
He is also Jewish.
And they purged him out because he criticized Netanyahu.
So, you've got Adam Baylor.
Tapper.
You've got Max Blumenthal.
These are all Jewish people arguing about this.
And so I guess now they're Palestinians like Schumer, right?
This is all politics, and we're not allowed to have a say about what a foreign country is doing in war and in politics?
And we're just supposed to shut up and fall in line, give them money and continue the bloodshed?
Never.
Never.
This has become absurd.
So, Trump doesn't want peace.
Trump wants Gaza.
And of course, he's not the only one.
There's a lot of people like that.
Take a look at what is happening in Oklahoma, for example.
Ben Dunson, talking about the danger of unintended consequences.
He said last May...
I wrote about how the U.S. House of Representatives was considering a bill that would make legally binding the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's working definition of what anti-Semitism was.
The bill passed the House, but has not yet even been considered by the Senate.
Yet a number of states have enacted this into law.
And now Republican-controlled Oklahoma is about to do that.
He said the argument I made then is just as pressing now.
He said there's many things that people might say about Jews or other groups that are abhorrent for all sorts of reasons, but these bills are not the right way to deal with this problem.
And by the way, you know, when you look at Tommy Tuberville, well, we can't have hateful speech out there.
No, you can.
If you don't have hateful speech, then you don't have a First Amendment.
Right?
May you disagree with what you have to say, but I'll fight to the death your right to say it.
If you don't do that, you don't have free speech.
If somebody has a real deranged hatred of an ethnic group, we ought to oppose that publicly, but not censor that publicly.
Look, real anti-Semitism ought to be allowed.
Under free speech.
Even if somebody has an irrational hatred of that, that needs to be allowed.
And it needs to be pointed out.
It needs to be debated.
It needs to be exposed.
And I think people will wake up to that.
If you try to suppress things that aren't even hatred of an ethnic group, what you do is you create hatred of that ethnic group.
They're creating exactly what they're trying to...
This is the way these people fight all their wars as well.
First of all, he says, this punishes speech that is allowed under the U.S. Constitution because even anti-Semitism is allowed under the real anti-Semitism is allowed under the Constitution.
He said, the point of the First Amendment was to prevent our government from policing speech that they disfavored.
Do you want them deciding what is true and false?
What is loving and what is hateful?
How absurd.
But the right has become just a mirror image.
As I said before, it disgusted me to see people on the left essentially worshiping Obama, and then they did it even worse with Trump.
And it disgusted me to see these people screaming racist, racist, racist, and playing the race card over everything, regardless of how unrelated it was.
And now the right is doing it even worse.
He said, secondly, he said these state bills and their actual wording would prohibit the speech of the New Testament itself.
The New Testament states Jewish leaders, with the complicity of the Roman authorities, were indeed responsible for the death of Jesus Christ.
These texts do not place guilt on Jews then or now, all Jews then or now, for killing Jesus Christ, but that's beside the point.
To simply affirm the words of these passages would cause one to run afoul of anti-Semitism bills.
Folks, if you don't have free speech, it's going to bounce back on you in a wide variety of things.
And again, they're going to allow this International Holocaust Remembrance Group to define what it is.
I think the best definition of this has been done for us by Donald Trump.
If he can de-Jew a real Jew like Chuck Schumer, if he can say, you're no longer a Jew, you're now a Palestinian.
Well, now we know what they're really talking about.
It's about politics.
And it's about Netanyahu.
And as Free Thought Project, Caitlin Johnstone said, the West's support for Israel is the number one threat to free speech.
That is absolutely true.
And we're seeing it now coming.
Now the big threat to free speech is coming from Trump and his administration.
And we better oppose this.
So that even if you've never cared about Israel before, you should be opposing it.
If you care about the existence of free speech in your society.
She said you should be aggressively resisting this war on speech even if you support Israel.
This is going to blow back on Israel.
You know, just as Ron Paul would always say, we have these wars and they're ill-considered, poorly executed.
We always wind up getting blowback from them.
Well, you know, when you do a war on our free speech and our Constitution, it's going to be blowback on that.
That's going to be in a way that you don't really want to have.
And we're starting to see it now.
Wayne Wonder, thank you very much for the tip.
Zox of Oxos says, like the PCR test, everything is positive for anti-Semitism.
That's right.
Jason Barker to Whistler, I think the guy David was talking about for farming might be Richard Sachs.
From Lost Arts Radio.
I'll have to take a look at that and see.
Yeah, thank you.
Angry Tiger.
All the Republicans were crying about the hate speech laws.
Now they're implementing them in an even more draconian manner than the liberals.
You're right.
Absolutely right.
Jason Barker says, violating rights is okay when it's our guy.
That's what I'm seeing from my guy.
Absolutely.
No, they demand it.
Yeah, whatever he does, it's okay.
Yeah, he's our dictator.
He may be an SOB, but he's our SOB, right?
Soylent Goy, this is just the beginning.
First, he'll target non-white immigrants and foreigners, labeling them anti-Semitism.
The real target is white Christians.
Eventually, that's where they always go, isn't it?
Mav 2022, hate speech?
That's a moving goalpost because it is so subjectively determined.
Hate speech is just simply whatever the people in power hate you to say.
That's all it is.
It should never be a crime.
And now, they're not just making it some kind of a crime where you get deplatformed or you get a fine, but they're actually putting people in prison for this non-crime.
We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. You're
listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, Cecilia 14. David Knight, I saw yesterday, where Jordan Peterson and a rabbi are involved in making Christ the King, that Christ is King, hate speech.
But death to America is okay.
Yeah, that goes back to, of course, Jordan Peterson works for Ben Shapiro.
Candace Owen had said that.
And, of course, it is true.
You know, we had the founders of this country said during the Revolution, no king but Jesus, right?
But when you look at Jordan Peterson, I don't take anything he says seriously anymore.
He had a moment there when everybody...
Didn't really know how to deal with people labeling them as racist and sexist and all this other kind of stuff.
So he went on an interview with one of these people, a woman, and he basically owned her.
You know, he didn't back down, and he owned her.
So a lot of people are like, oh, that's how you do it, you know, that type of thing.
So he had a moment, but the guy is absolutely clueless.
He's not a Christian.
He's playing around with all of this mysticism with his Jungian psychiatry and all the rest of the stuff.
Same thing that RFK Jr. is into as well.
And it was when RFK Jr. was talking about how he had this Jungian moment that helped him to get away from his drug addiction.
That's when I realized really where Jordan Peterson was coming from.
You know, it was another one of these stupid schools of psychology.
Like Freud, you know, well Jung.
He folds in a lot of supernatural stuff, but I don't pay any attention to Jordan Peterson.
He's been calling to end anonymity on the Internet.
He's just all over the place, just like everybody else that works for Ben Shapiro.
Now, take a look at this.
I've talked about the horrific stuff that's happening in Syria.
Thousands of people that are being massacred there.
Some tolls go up as high as 7,000.
Going door to door.
And they have some, on their ID there, they have not only religion, but what sect you're in, you know, so that the Muslims can kill each other more efficiently or whatever.
But they're going door to door.
The people that we helped to win this war, we gave them air support, the A-10 warthogs, and all the rest of this stuff.
And so, as all of this is happening, this guy, Jelani, who's running this, This abomination, this genocide that's being conducted against Christians and Alawites there.
He was invited by the EU to a donor summit as this massacre is going on.
Isn't that amazing?
See, the EU is just a bunch of bloody tyrants.
They really are.
And, of course, they've always been a state of perpetual war.
And as we see the efforts to try to stop this war in Russia that the Trump administration is doing, You see just how bloodthirsty the EU is.
But this takes it to a whole new level, I think.
A well-known Mideast regional correspondent said Tuesday at a time when many thought the killings were over, quote, I just got an urgent message from somebody in Baniyas, Syria, telling me that gunmen are right now, all uppercase, right now, spotted at a small Alawite village of Al-Sin.
And he tells where that is geographically.
Gunmen are roaming through the village.
Civilians are terrified, hiding in houses, nearby fields.
Tens of thousands of persecuted Syrian civilians currently seeking safety, both in northern Lebanon, excuse me, and in a Russian air base that is there, as it's been documented.
And yet, they invite this guy, as all this stuff is happening and continues to happen, they invite him to a donor summit.
Kind of like what we did with his predecessors.
The Mujahideen, the Al-Qaeda, the ISIS, and al-Nusra, and all the rest of these.
We did the same thing.
America did the same thing.
NATO. People like Mitch McConnell.
People like Lindsey Graham.
And folks, if these people have their way, we're going to have death and destruction like we did with World War I and World War II. As George Washington was saying when he said entangling alliances, he was talking about Europe.
That's what he was talking about.
World War I, World War II, we have seen all of this stuff.
And now these people, despite the fact that at the very moment that his forces are slaughtering innocent civilians, they said his government will be represented, and he was directly invited.
And this article says, well, this is deep irony.
No.
Hypocrisy.
Hypocrisy.
Not irony.
And an outrage.
But they knew this all along.
Even the economists recently admitted that Jelani is a great pretender.
An Al-Qaeda jihadist wearing a suit.
Now he is suddenly embraced by the West.
They want to pretend that they didn't know, but now they do know.
They do know.
They're inviting him in.
Just like all these Al-Qaeda people.
It was only a few short years ago.
Literally.
The personal emissary of ISIS Amir al-Baghdadi.
That was what he was doing a couple of years ago.
So they didn't know.
Now he'll be wined and dined with red carpet and fawning media in a European capital.
But perhaps this was the plan all along, they said.
Their concern was never about the Syrian people.
And so the question is, when is it right to stop fighting?
And this is an article from World Magazine.
Talking about what I've talked about before, you know, the idea of a just war.
You know, when we were talking about what Daniel Davis said, he said, well, you know, we should have these discussions as to what a war is going to cost us.
You might also want to take a look as to whether or not you've been attacked or whether or not this is a preemptive war that you are starting.
And you also should take a look at the cost to civilian lives, including your own civilians, that are going to happen.
And also whether or not you can win it, and that's what they're talking about here.
If it's going to be a futile effort, it's unjust to do it.
But it's only just if you are the victim of the aggression instead of the aggressor.
If you're the aggressor, it's never just.
But to continue to fight is only justified if there is a chance of you achieving your means.
That's why I say what Israel has continued to do in Gaza is unjustified.
Because, quite frankly, if their intention is really to get Hamas, it ain't working.
At this point, you're done.
You need to stop it.
And, of course, we all see what the real agenda is.
There's no question about it now.
So thank you, Trump, for making that very clear.
Thank you also for making very clear that this cover of racism and ethnic hatred is just something that you've made up and can arbitrarily change at any point you want.
And then finally, I'll say this about the EU. We now have Volkswagen welcoming the opportunity to become part of a military-industrial complex, to start making weapons again.
Think about it.
They had made civilian cars.
They got very good at making fuel-efficient, durable diesel engines, and it was our government that basically put a gun to their head and forced them to give up all that and make electric vehicles that are unsustainable, that will put them and all the other car companies that do it out of business.
But they went from having these wonderful diesel cars to being one of the biggest embracers Electric stuff.
Under billions of dollars of penalty, jail time, and all the rest of the stuff for CEOs.
Now, they've been turned around to where they make war machines.
Isn't that great?
And we have the Polish president, Duda.
All the Duda day.
His name is D-U-D-A. He's off to the Camp Town races, and he wants actually, the Camp Town races are going to be a nuclear race.
He wants nuclear weapons in Poland.
Because, folks, NATO and EU is just about senseless wars.
That's what this thing has always done.
we're going to take a really short break and we'll be right back
music plays
music plays
music plays music plays You're listening to The David Knight Show.
What is happening here in Tennessee in terms of education, this is something that I thought was a victory that had been won.
In Tennessee, we have our globalist governor, Bill Lee, had pushed for vouchers and things like that.
And a lot of people were concerned about the money that was there.
And there was kind of an agreement, okay, that's fine.
We understand how the money can be used and is used always to control people.
But we'll let you have the free act.
And you remember I talked about this, and I thought that it was a done deal, really, at the time.
It sounded like it had all the support it needed.
And here we are in Tennessee, a conservative Republican area.
Who would vote against the idea of parents owning their kids?
I mean, what is this, MSNBC?
We've got Melissa Harris-Perry.
We've got to get over this idea that you own your kids.
You don't.
They belong to the state.
Well, it turns out we've got five Republicans who think that and who shut this thing down.
And the idea behind the Free Act was that they were going to say, you don't take government money.
We're not going to require you to have any oversight from us whatsoever.
you're the parent of the children and you get to make their educational and curriculum decisions and we're not going to harass you with reports and oversight and all the rest of this stuff well that didn't go As a matter of fact, this is one Tennessee representative who is talking about it.
It was today when I heard that the bill, the Free Act for homeschoolers, had been killed in the house yesterday.
I can't repeat what I felt because it would be too obscene for you to print.
And that's somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but not really.
I was really disappointed.
I was devastated.
We had prayed over this bill.
We know that this bill is right.
We know that God gives children to parents, not to the state.
And anybody that would stand against this legislation either didn't read it or needs...
Some assistance in comprehending.
Because this was an extremely well-written, very concise bill that would have allowed parents the opportunity for the fourth class of homeschooling in Tennessee, which is true independence, true freedom.
Twelve other states have already passed this type of legislation.
Tennessee, we will be back.
because the parents of Tennessee and the students of Tennessee deserve to be able to homeschool without any problems that are associated with the state government intervening in that very sacred ability to homeschool your own children.
Yeah.
And that's, I said Representative, that's Senator Janice Bowling.
Thank you for doing that.
And that was brought to the attention of those interviews she had with Tennessee Conservative News.
By the way, you can follow them on Twitter.
You can always find out where their publication is.
The guy who runs Tennessee Conservative had this to say.
If you're a homeschool parent like I am, or you know someone who is, share this video with them, because there are five Republicans in Tennessee that think you don't have the right to homeschool your kids without the government's interference, despite their failing track record.
They are as follows.
Scott Sapicki, William Slater, Chris Hurt.
Jay Reedy and Mark White.
If these are your representatives, I would strongly urge you to get out there and field a primary candidate and get rid of them.
Let's get into it.
Yeah, and so that goes on for about five minutes, and I'm getting close to the end of the show here, so I don't have time to play any more of that for you, but that's the idea.
There are things that, you know, there's always going to be a fight, and one of the best places to fight for your freedom is at the local and state level, and so that is something those people...
We need to pay attention to, and maybe even those of us who are outside of those districts, maybe we need to pay attention to who those people are and get them out.
If ever there was a time to primary somebody out, somebody who's not going to stand for the rights of parents to raise their own children.
Jonathan Turley, talking about big education.
He said, big education is pushed too far in denying parental rights.
And I tell you that...
These people are Republicans, and I've mentioned this many times, and I'll say it one more time.
Even in North Carolina, years ago, when it was completely controlled, the government was controlled, both houses as well as the governor were Democrats, and they were completely indebted to the teachers' unions.
It was a letter-writing campaign from homeschoolers that scared them enough that they did not shut down homeschooling as the teachers' unions were demanding.
You can have an effect.
You really can't.
But in this article, Jonathan Turley, Is talking about progressives, as he calls them.
Look, let's understand what these people really are.
The accurate determination label for this is they are Gramsci Marxists.
They wanted to march through the institutions, and they have.
And we've got to march them right out of there.
But if we don't understand who they are, what their tactics and strategies are, we think this is some new thing.
They call it progressive.
It's not.
It's not.
It's not anything new.
It's been around for a very long time.
It's not about progress, either.
And it is not about woke politics.
This is Marxist politics, the brand...
The sect and the strategy of these Marxist politics is Antonio Gramsci.
And so he said, they're fighting parental rights in a multitude of ways.
One radical, now former school board member in Iowa, said, quote, the purpose of a public education is not to teach kids what the parents want.
It is to teach them what society needs them to know.
The client is not the parent, but the community.
Your children don't belong to you.
They belong to us.
And so Turley says, and again, he calls them progressives, but they are Gramsci Marxists.
A Gramsci Marxist shock over the result of the last election could prove to be a prelude to what is coming if they continue down this road.
There is no more powerful identity than that of a parent.
When you mess with our children, all other issues instantly become trivial.
It's not just passionate.
It is primal.
He said many politicians are terrified of defying the far-left teachers' unions.
They and these experts have no inkling of really what is coming.
He said school employees secretly arranged, in this particular case that he's talking about, for changes in everything from the use of mail bathrooms to the exclusive use of the child's name in class.
In a truly Orwellian line, The appeal judge declared, as per our understanding of Supreme Court precedent, our pluralistic society assigns those curricular and administrative decisions to the expertise of school officials charged with the responsibility of educating children.
Well, you know, I've talked many times about going back to the beginnings of when they started trying to sexually groom children.
First, it was sex education.
And I'm just going to tell them the facts of life.
And, you know, but they took it down to kids that were like, you know, eight years old.
And so father up in Massachusetts says, I don't want my daughter being educated about this by you.
And I don't want it done at this age.
And I want her out of the class.
And they said no.
So he went down there the day where they were going to be teaching, and he came down there and he said, I'm here to get my daughter out of class.
They had him arrested.
And the judge in the case said, when you drop your child off at the school, you have abandoned them to the state.
And that's what we need to understand.
That's the way they view this.
You are not the client.
The community is.
You are not in control.
You have abandoned your child to the state.
Turley said most of us have now missed that memo.
That's right.
They all have, pretty much.
Few would believe that sending our children to a public school means that we have transferred the most fundamental parental rights to experts, quote-unquote, on rearing children.
However, changing the gender of a child is a bit more weighty than requiring a school uniform or stipulating nutritional choices and school lunches.
He says, the due process clause of the 14th Amendment guarantees citizens no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property.
Now, you need something more direct.
You need a parental rights amendment in the Constitution.
And I'm going to play you a little clip here when the program ends of what I did back in 2009 for that purpose, for the organization that was pushing parental rights, parentalrights.org.
But he says this, and I think it's something for us all to think about.
He says, I remember when we had our first child.
We were escorted out of the hospital by a nurse, and after helping my wife into the car, I turned around and was handed a swaddled bundle with a baby inside.
The nurse then walked away as I stood there in a moment of utter panic.
We were given a small human being at the curbside with a level of preparation of a Starbucks latte.
I stood there looking at my son, Ben, with the same level of confidence that I would have had if handed a small nuclear device.
And then been tasked with defusing it.
But you soon realize that you're all in.
He said, our children had us at hello.
The moment that bundle was put into my arms, I changed.
I was a dad.
All my priorities changed.
He said, no one told me at the hospital carport that he was ours He is old enough to be turned over to the expertise of public school officials.
Oh, then he belongs to the state, right?
The fact is that by the time our kids go to school, we are the experts on that child.
We know them the best, and we know what is best for them.
Teachers, he said, clearly have important training and expertise, but they don't know that child.
Not really.
We've got to stop paying attention to experts.
We've got to stop abandoning our family to these institutions that are owned by Gram C. Marxists.
Thank you for listening.
Have a good weekend.
I'll see you on Monday.
We're going to play Self-Evident for you.
Stay tuned for just a couple minutes.
Certain truths are self-evident.
We're endowed by our Creator with rights.
Certain relationships are also inalienable.
Family was the first institution created by our Creator and the family is the fundamental building block of every healthy society and every just government.
But government and family are two different authorities or spheres with different roles and different responsibilities.
Each authority is uniquely suited for a particular task and doesn't do the task of the other well.
Families have traditionally been assumed to be acting out of love in the best interest of its members and have been left alone unless proven to be abusive.
But a new attitude has been cultivated by those that believe children should be raised by the village and not by their family.
This approach to children and their families has been spelled out in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
The UN Convention assumes government responsibility for all the needs of children and transfers responsibilities and rights from parents.
to government.
Government is seen as capable of providing every want to the child and as responsible for instilling correct values, their values, into children.
Parents are mentioned in the UN Convention only as problems for children to be protected from or as mere advisors to their children, so long as their advice is not too strong or coercive.
Children are encouraged to form their values independent of their parents.
But nowhere is there a sense that they would ever need protection from a government.
This troubling document has been ratified as a treaty throughout the world, with the U.S. as virtually the only lone holdout.
The U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child is about 16 pages.
On the other hand, the Parental Rights Amendment is only three short paragraphs.
It's a simple restatement of what has until recently been what every culture, every government, except authoritarian governments, saw as the rights of parents.
The Parental Rights Amendment would strengthen the Constitution to protect the family by explicitly stating, Self-evident truths about an inalienable relationship.
Export Selection