All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 10, 2025 - The David Knight Show
03:00:46
Mon Episode #1,948: Faith Fraud, Fake Flu, Climate Lies, Backdoor Spies: Unveiling Sinister Schemes
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
In
a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 10th of February, year of our Lord, 2025.
And yet we have Trump deciding that he's going to make God great again.
We'll talk about the White House Office of Faith, or whatever the official title is.
We're also going to talk about the USAID's Shadow Empire.
From rigging elections to global censorship.
And speaking of global censorship, we're going to have Goat Tree on with us today.
A big precedent may be set with Apple caving in to the UK. They could go to jail if they even talk about this order that has come from the UK. It's about Big Brother.
Coming in the back door of everything.
Of everything.
Then we have people looking at prison sentences for exposing the plandemic because they have to have you believe that it was a lab leak.
And climate control or control through climate.
It never stops, does it?
And so we're going to be right back.
back stay with us yeah I'm gonna begin today with the faith office at the White House
There's a lot of things wrong with this.
A lot of things wrong with Paula White, quite frankly.
And it should be a big red flag to any Christians who want to put Trump on a pedestal that he's put her on a pedestal.
She, I guess, is the Christian equivalent of Fauci.
She is to Christianity what Fauci is to science.
Let's just put it that way.
An evil poison.
And she, three times married, billionaire, has opened a faith office at the White House, led by Paula White, who I think is also on her third marriage, I believe.
I don't follow her that closely.
I know she's had at least two, but I think three.
One of them was her taking over a church, kind of like the movie The Apostle.
That was a great movie, by the way, if you've never seen that movie.
It's a day earlier, Trump had unveiled a task force under the new Attorney General Pam Bondi to root out what he called the persecution of Christians in the United States.
Well, you might want to start with some of the cabinet picks of Trump.
You might want to start with Tulsi Gabbard, for example, and ask her why she is allied with a radical Hindu group that is running the government in India.
A government that is ranked number 11 in terms of the most severe Christian persecution.
Not just Christians.
They're coming after every religion that is in India.
And India's got a lot of different religions.
They've been involved in assassination attempts and attempted assassinations of Sikh leaders.
And I guess if you put somebody who is allied with that Hindu radical party that's running the government of India, somebody like Tulsi Gabbard, it might make their job a little bit easier to find and to assassinate the people they don't like.
So you might want to start with Tulsi.
But all this comes to the fact that Trump has held a very ambiguous relationship with religion.
That's putting it mildly, isn't it?
And then there's the sexual scandals, they said.
But let me tell you, there is no sexual scandal that is as amazing as this perversion of Christianity called Paula White.
I guess this is the Paula White House.
This week I'm also creating the White House Faith Office, led by Pastor Paula White, who is so amazing.
That we would strike the ground, for you will give us victory, God.
I hear a sound of abundance of rain.
I hear a sound of victory.
I hear a sound of shouting and singing.
I hear a sound of...
Well, that's some strong preaching there, isn't it?
Rules.
When I walk on White House grounds, God walks on White House grounds.
I had every right and authority to declare the White House as holy ground, because I was standing there, and where I stand is holy.
Hallelujah!
To say no to President Trump would be saying no to God.
We are in a spiritual war right now.
Let every demonic network that has aligned itself against the purpose, against the calling of President Trump, let it be broken, let it be torn down in the name of Jesus.
You want me to tell you what my thoughts are?
The thoughts of the King of Kings.
The thoughts of the Lord of Lords.
I'm downloading heaven.
Overload.
Yeah, blew some fuses.
You make a laughing stock of Christ.
You're a reproach to him.
You're disgusting.
What was the date?
That it became okay in the body of Christ all of a sudden to trash people by name that you've never met.
She's a public figure, isn't she?
You're all scripture experts, which is why you hate Paula White's guts, because you know the Bible so well.
That there's a scripture that says, that Jesus said, if you have a problem with your brother or sister, go to them personally.
This week I'm also creating the White House Faith Office.
Led by Pastor Paula White, who is so amazing.
Yeah, you know, for those of you who are listening, I'll put up some quotes that were there.
That last guy, how dare you criticize somebody you don't even know publicly.
We are to oppose false teachings.
And she is the embodiment of false teaching.
Everything from the tight jeans and, you know.
The rock star persona.
And the fact that she says, anybody who's telling you to deny yourself is from Satan.
She just called Christ satanic, didn't she?
Christ said, deny yourself and take up your cross.
He didn't say, follow me and I'll make you rich.
Give me your money and I'll return to you many times over that.
No, that's not why Christ came.
She's perverted Christianity.
She's perverted his mission.
She is a deceiver, one of the worst.
And of course, it makes sense that she would be Trump's spiritual advisor.
They don't come wearing horns and wearing a red suit, do they?
But she's straight out of hell, folks.
And it is a reproach to Christianity, a reproach to Christ.
And I don't, for the life of me, understand why Christians follow this guy and praise him.
Not at all.
Not at all.
As a matter of fact, one of the other quotes that I put up there said, Satan is not fighting Christianity.
He's too smart for that.
What he does is he creates a fake version of Christianity.
These people, these TV evangelists, and they're grifting, and they're jumping around on stage, and they're theatrics, and the rest of this stuff is to make a laughingstock of Christianity.
You know where that red suit came from?
That was in the Middle Ages.
They thought, well, Satan's, you know, We've got to oppose Satan.
So let's oppose him by mocking him.
Because, you know, it is the most effective weapon, said Saul Alinsky, who dedicated his book to Lucifer, his book Rules for Radicals.
This guy who dedicated his book to Lucifer said ridicule is the most effective weapon.
There's no answer to it.
And so what the people in the Middle Ages did, they tried to ridicule Satan.
By dressing him up, you know, having people wear a red suit and horns and a tail and all the rest of this stuff.
It's just nonsense.
And so are people like Paula White.
People like Julie Green.
They disgust me.
And this is stuff, folks, that is vital.
This is far more...
What happens to Christianity?
What happens to the church globally?
It's far more important than what happens to America, frankly.
The two are tied together.
The people Trump has chosen to surround himself with in the White House are also telling, says this establishment article, and they're right about that.
This is worse than just hypocrisy, the hypocrisy of Trump.
This is a false gospel.
This is worshiping money.
You know, Brian Shulhavi had a long article.
He said that Jesus said he didn't come to make the world a better place.
That's right, he didn't.
He didn't come to make you rich.
He didn't come to give you your best life now.
He came to give you eternal riches, not riches on this earth, not your best life now.
If this is our best life now, as Paul said, we are the most miserable of people.
Is that right?
But that's not what this is about.
We as Christians understand that this life is a very small, doesn't even show up as a blip in eternity.
As Brian says, Jesus clearly taught no one that one should not seek to be prosperous or famous in a world that belongs to Satan.
But instead we are to live a life of watchfulness waiting for the day when Jesus returns to destroy the earth.
You know, it is interesting, I think, that so many of these people who find something else to worship, whether it is the American government or Donald Trump or Benjamin Netanyahu or the Israeli government or whatever it is, they always think that this is where their best life is.
And many of them are very excited for the Day of the Lord, as one person asked me last week.
He said, what do you think of this particular thing?
And in it, It was Amos, Prophet Amos, talking to Israel, and he was calling them out for what had happened collectively in that nation.
A lot of different nations were called out in Amos.
And he said, a lot of you are so excited about the Day of the Lord, except that it's going to be a time of judgment, not just a time of reward.
For some people, it's going to be a time of judgment.
And others, it'll be a time of reward.
And you see that all the time, the Day of the Lord.
It's about that.
When Christ began his ministry, he took the scroll of Isaiah and he said, the Spirit of the Lord is upon me.
He's anointed me to free the captives and help the poor and all the rest of this stuff.
And to declare the year of the Lord's favor.
And he stops.
But the text doesn't stop there.
It says the day of the Lord's wrath, paraphrasing it here.
But basically, he stops it at mid-sentence.
And that's where we live, in mid-sentence.
We live in the time of the Lord's favor and His grace because He's given us time to look at this.
And some people use this as an opportunity to heap wealth upon themselves.
And that's why I have nothing but disgust for these TV evangelists paired with a TV star.
And the White House.
And so, when we look at this, as Brian Chavez says, and he's got it right, he says, there's nothing to make great again when we look at America.
Right?
Is that what we want to focus on?
The idea that to make it great can only be understood by greatness in the sense of Satan's world system.
Because Jesus said he was going to come back and destroy all this.
So what are we trying to make great?
Whenever you see them say, let's make America great again.
Let's make health great again.
You want to make anything great and magnify something other than God, you're headed down the wrong path.
And that's what this all is headed down the wrong path.
It is a corrupt political system.
Whether you're talking about health or you're talking about Trump or you're talking about any of the rest of this stuff.
Yeah, we can try to minimize it and we should.
And we should not be afraid to exercise our religion.
I'm not saying that.
I'm saying, though, that we don't need to have a faith office.
Show me your faith without an office.
And I'll show you my faith with an office?
No, that's not the way it goes.
That's basically...
What Trump is trying to tell us, he doesn't need to have an office, and the Constitution doesn't support anything like that.
And what that's going to do is it's going to bring not necessarily cries about separation of church and state, although they will come from the usual suspects.
Even when they have a prayer breakfast, and they're perfectly entitled to do that.
You don't have to take a vow of atheism when you become a government official.
And you're not prohibited from exercising your own faith.
But when we talk about things like these faith offices and stuff, it's always been twisted.
As a matter of fact, what I'm going to talk about next here is the fact that these liberals are wringing their hands and saying, look at this.
Trump is attacking these Christian organizations that have been making so much money out of government handouts.
They put themselves up as a faith institution that's going to help immigrants or homeless or this or that.
If you're a church, you don't need a government handout to do that.
Is that what Jesus said?
Did he go around to people and he said, I want you to help the poor.
I want you to get the Roman government to help the poor.
Right?
He didn't say that.
He said, you do it.
He didn't say get the government to do it.
And these so-called faith institutions that the left love so much, they love to point out the fact that it was George W. Bush.
Who set up a lot of these things.
And what have they become?
A grift, just like Paula White.
What's the purpose of this faith office that is there?
Again, just a bunch of phony grifters.
And it eventually leads to these kinds of attacks.
On legitimate free exercise of religion.
In your imagination.
Republic.
And then this one is entering Gilead, of course, a reference to a creepy dystopic theocracy, which is the slippery slope we're heading down with events like this.
Let's walk and I'll tell you more about it.
We don't need to know any more about it.
But this guy really hates it, right?
Separation of church and state!
No, it's about the establishment of religion.
It's not about...
And you know that wall?
Build the wall?
Jefferson was reassuring the Danbury Baptists that the wall would be built around the government, that the government would leave them alone.
That's where the wall is.
And it's not in the Constitution.
They pretend that it's in the Constitution.
What's in the Constitution is that the federal government will not establish an official religion.
All of the state governments had official religions.
And they continued into places like Massachusetts up into the 1840s.
Several of the New England states had official religions.
And on and on.
But Marky Mark, thank you for the tip, he says, How does Paul wait?
Meet the biblical requirement of a pastor to be the husband of one wife.
Can anyone explain that?
Yeah, well, that's the obvious thing, isn't it?
Right there.
That's where it all begins.
Hey, she could do that by marrying another woman.
There we go.
How about that?
You got some of them that do that as well in some of these churches.
Solo board gaming night says 1 Timothy 2, 11, 12.
Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness.
I don't see that.
That's why she doesn't know anything.
She hasn't learned anything with submissiveness.
I don't permit a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man.
Rather, she is to remain quiet.
You know, these denominations that do this kind of stuff, they have a problem going back to Genesis 1. God created them male and female.
The problems begin right there.
They don't seem to want to accept that or what they see either.
Grammy for God.
The most popular pastors are prosperity pimps.
What's that tell you about the church today?
Yes.
Birdhouse Blues.
Paula White broke up three marriages.
Including three of her own with adultery.
Well, that's right.
And one of those involved, she was in a church with her husband as co-pastors.
And like I said, it broke up that church.
It's kind of like what you see in The Apostle with Robert Duvall.
Anyway, members of Trump's administration have used biblical precedents to define Trump's policy of family separation at the U.S.-Mexico border, says Vox.
And so they're going to attack Paula White because she defends the protection of borders.
You know whenever God talks about different people groups?
He talks about nations, tongues, and tribes.
And Michael Savage, I don't know if he got this from the Bible, but that's the way he breaks it down.
I think he even wrote a book about it.
It says borders, tongues, and culture.
That's what nations, tongues, and culture.
That's what nations, tongues, and tribes really break down to.
And that is a distinction.
God doesn't make a distinction based on skin color or anything like that.
But he does make a distinction based on borders as well as culture and language.
And Paula White, in terms of defending Trump's immigration stuff, throws out her biblical ignorance out here and just making stuff up.
She said, Jesus couldn't have broken any immigration laws during his family's flight to Egypt because Jesus, who is without sin, could not therefore have broken the law.
Is that the way you're going to defend this?
Whistler put up when she was repeating that.
And I didn't play the worst one of those.
They're coming to take me away.
Ha ha.
That is true.
But look.
There were no immigration laws at the time of Jesus.
There were no welfare state, any of that kind of stuff at all.
And so this is the worst anachronism.
But then she compounds it with something that I'm pretty sure I never saw this in the Bible.
Well, Jesus did live in Egypt for three and a half years.
You're just making this stuff up left and right.
It's just, it's sad to see this deception.
I mean, there's a lot of people who give her a lot of money.
There's a lot of people who trust her.
There's a lot of people who think that by following what she's telling them, that they're going to be saved.
That's the tragedy, folks.
That's a tragedy.
And how dare that guy say that we need to shut up and sit down?
Does he not care about the souls of those people that she's misleading?
In recent weeks, the Southern Baptist Convention issued a resolution in favor of the dignity of refugees.
Another reason to get rid of the Southern Baptist Convention.
Yes, they have dignity, but they don't have any right to welfare.
Nobody has a right to welfare, especially foreigners.
Yes, you treat the foreigner in your midst with dignity, but that doesn't mean that they can live off of you.
So Vox says, White did not mention that Jesus was ultimately executed by Judean colonial authorities for perceived political insurrection.
There they go.
They got to throw in insurrection.
See?
That's what we should have done to all of those people that followed Trump.
We should have crucified him, I guess.
It had nothing to do with that.
Yes, people killed him.
And yes, they bear responsibility for that.
But he also said, no one takes my life.
I lay it down.
And so that's the thing that's missing whenever we hear that.
I hear that even from my friends.
Who will say, well, the bankers got him or whatever.
It's like people following their own desires.
And God used that.
But nobody took his life from him.
He laid it down willingly.
Her colleague on the Evangelical Advisory Board, Robert Jeffress.
This is another pimp.
This guy, he's a Baptist.
He doesn't do the speaking in tongues stuff.
He tells you to take the vaccine.
He works at Curtis Chang to tell pastors to deceive their own people into injecting a poison shot, mRNA, that has not been tested, but of course it was tested by the military, and they knew exactly what they were doing.
Just amazing.
How these people deceive people.
And as I point out, he frequently invokes Romans 13. Even Vox gets that.
Even Vox gets that.
To defend Trump's ability to do whatever he wishes in terms of foreign policy disputes.
Well, of course.
Because we've seen people like Todd Friel defend Joe Biden telling you to take the vaccine.
He says the government tells you to wear a pinwheel on your head, you wear a pinwheel on your head.
They tell you to...
You know, stick a pen in your arm and inject poison?
I guess you're supposed to do that too, right?
No.
No.
That's why I have, last week I had on Matt Trujillo talk about the doctrine of lesser magistrates.
We have principles that are above these governments.
And when the government becomes evil, we are required, required to oppose it.
It doesn't become, Just a possibility.
And that was reflected in the Declaration of Independence.
Saying that governments were instituted among men to protect our rights and our liberties.
And among those are the right to life.
And that when government becomes destructive of those things, it is not only our right, but our duty to alter or to abolish that government.
We don't just have a right.
To ignore a government that is acting evil.
It is our duty to oppose it.
So, they said, Romans 13, the way that it is used by Robert Jeffress, the way that it's used by Todd Friel and others, leads to knee-jerk authoritarianism, and they're absolutely right.
A deference to law and order, they said, is fundamental to the way evangelicals think about immigration policy.
Again, they're muddying the water.
That's the difference between law and order and principles and what they're talking about here with blind obedience to anything that government does.
The idea of laws being inflexible and authority being absolute.
See, the only absolute authority is from God and the principles that he lays out are the yardstick by which we...
Judge these people.
But in the United States, we have another important yardstick.
Even though the Constitution is routinely ignored and trashed, it is the yardstick for us to see whether or not these people are honest, whether or not they have authority, because they swear to uphold the Constitution as a condition of their office.
Once they have broken that oath, they have no legitimate authority.
They may have a lot of power, and they do, but they don't have any legitimate authority.
So, again, in this article from Vox, they focus on Romans 13, and they don't understand it either.
Washington Post.
Attacks on Catholics Lutherans suggest a new Trump approach on religion.
See, they are pro-immigration, but they're not pro-life.
Isn't that interesting?
How do you stand for the rights and dignity of an individual, and yet...
Say they can be murdered.
And then, as I said before, they fall back to George W. Bush in 1999. Then presidential candidate George W. Bush called for the funding of religious groups that fed the hungry and housed the homeless.
And how did that work out for us?
Well, that's what gave us, and this is what the MAGA people need to understand.
That the reason that we've got a lot of this Corruption that we're seeing in government now.
It's because it came in under the disguise of faith.
But it's not the government's job to take care of people.
It is our job to take care of the poor and the hungry.
And we have kicked that over to them, or we've got these different institutions, these different denominations, as they're saying here in the Washington Post, Catholics, Lutherans, Presbyterians.
They'll take care of people if the government gives them some money, and they'll take a cut.
They'll profit from it.
That's the other thing, too.
Now, this is not the situation we talked about when we had the tornado not too far from us in North Carolina, where everybody brings in food and leaves it at a church parking lot, and the church hands it out to other people.
If that's your idea of what's going on with these big denominations, that's unbelievably naive.
That's not what is happening.
They are being paid like any other charity.
They take a cut of this stuff.
This is not just passing along what the government is doing.
And it's not coming out of their pocket either.
Several religious groups working overseas say they are facing a cash crisis after the Trump administration ended funding for programs to resettle refugees from around the world into the United States.
Well, good.
That's good.
First of all, you could help them where they are.
Instead of bringing them here.
You could help them with your own labor, your own effort, and your own cash.
These are not charitable organizations, folks.
These are political parasites masquerading as charitable organizations.
One person here, they quote Melissa Deckman, a political scientist.
Who isn't?
I don't know what science there is in politics.
I guess it's behavioral science.
So these actions are, quote, a total abandonment of faith-based groups.
Look, that's just a government grant.
They're not doing anything by faith.
You want to see somebody doing something by faith?
Go look at the biography of George Mueller.
He stepped down in faith and he helped orphans.
He didn't have a cent when he did it.
And his entire long life and long diary...
It's about how God met the needs for him to take care of all these children that he took responsibility for just in time.
And kids would come in, one day they came in, you know, sitting down for breakfast, and he doesn't have a penny, and he doesn't have any food.
And he prays, asking God to help him.
And there's a knock on the door, and a milk truck broke down just in front of his house.
And then another knock a little bit later, and a baker says, I've got too much bread.
I wanted to give you some of it today.
That's what faith-based ministry looks like.
Go look at George Mueller.
Don't look at George Bush.
That's not faith-based.
That's grift.
That's graft.
That's corruption.
It corrupts the people who take the money, who live off of that money.
George Mueller didn't take any money with that stuff.
He was...
I mean, even in his church, he set up a box in the back, and he didn't ever talk to anybody about it.
Not like Paula White, who gets out there and says, no, you got an electric bill?
What's the name of an electric company here, right?
Well, do you pay them before you pay me?
That's what she's saying.
Well, if you pay them before you pay me, then you're not living by faith.
See how she twisted it, turned it upside down?
It's just satanic what she does.
Satanic.
So, Musk shared a General Flynn post that called illegal multiple Lutheran organizations that work in the United States to provide health care to homeless people, run food pantries, and help migrants and refugees.
They're taking government money when they do that.
Mike Flynn, the guy who is another grifter.
Going around leading people in prayers to an ascended master.
I mean, he even stole the prayer.
He doesn't even come up with his own satanic prayer.
He steals somebody else's satanic prayer.
You've got to plagiarize another satanic prayer here.
He called this money laundering.
It's not money laundering.
It's just grifting like he does.
I guess that's why he called it something that it isn't.
Because he says, hey, if I call it grifting, maybe they'll find out that I'm grifting people too.
Recent comments by Musk, Vance, and Flynn could also reflect a long-standing tension between some religious groups and some administrations, including on how and when they partner to handle topics like reproductive freedom.
Killing babies.
Some Christians kill babies and others don't.
Who are you to judge?
Or gender diversity.
Who are you to judge the perversion that God specifically condemns?
Or proselytizing?
Well, when they talk about proselytizing, they're not talking about proselytizing people to Christ.
They're talking about proselytizing kids, grooming them sexually into their LGBT religion.
You know, we had a story on LifeSite News about what is happening in Ireland and the UK. Misdiagnosed healthy babies aborted there.
And they said it exposes the eugenic mindset.
Because these stories all look at this and say, oh, this is horrible.
And it is horrible.
But to them, it's horrible because this baby was healthy.
It would have been justified if the baby had what they thought the baby had.
You understand the difference?
They said on March 14, 2019, shortly after the abortion was legalized in Ireland, Rebecca Price had an abortion in Dublin.
She had been told that her baby had trisomy 18. Remember that?
It's a very severe disease, but they said, well, the baby's not going to live.
But just a short period of time, it's going to be, life is short and brutal.
You know what?
Life is short and brutal if you live to be 100 compared to eternity.
But tests done on her baby boy's corpse after the abortion showed a misdiagnosis the child was healthy.
Now the reason that this has come to light is because now the parents are suing the hospital.
You killed my baby when there was nothing wrong with him.
But as LifeSite points out, the problem is that it would have been fine to kill the baby if there had been something wrong with him.
That's what we're being told.
We have a friend, had a friend, she's now passed on.
She had...
She had twins.
And, you know, they do the amniocentesis, if I'm pronouncing that correctly.
They test for Down syndrome.
Well, like any test that they do, especially, it's not as bad, I guess, as the PCR test, but so-called test.
But this one, you know, they test if you're older and to tell you if the baby's got Down syndrome.
They offered that to us because we were older when we had our first child, Whistler.
Any tests that they do can cause a problem.
And we did not want that moral dilemma, that pressure being put on us.
We said, we're not going to abort the baby anyway.
So, if it's got Down syndrome, it's got Down syndrome.
If it's got trisomy 18, it's got trisomy 18. We're going to deal with whatever God gives us.
But our friend had twins.
They gave her the test, and she was a nurse, and so she did all the stuff that they said, except the test came back positive.
And they said, you need to get rid of both of them.
I'm not going to do that.
One of the babies had Downs, the other was perfectly fine.
But the one that has had Downs, it's been a challenge for them, absolutely.
But certainly she loves that child, or loved that child, as long as she was alive.
And she would have never, never regretted that.
That she did that.
Her sister, on the other hand, liberal from Delaware.
I know we may have some listeners in Delaware.
And if you were there, you are probably really hardened into not being a liberal because of the surrounding.
I know that when I go to places like...
When I go to places like Washington State or Oregon, people would recognize me walking down the street because they hate living in this liberal soup that they're in.
But her sister disowned her and would never talk to her again.
They both died of breast cancer, but her sister would never talk to her.
You know, that's the other thing, too.
You're going to go to the point where we look at genetics and say, well...
You're at high risk for breast cancer.
Tell their mother to abort both of them.
They both died of breast cancer.
We're all going to die of something.
So, since discovering she had unnecessarily terminated her pregnancy, what would have been her first child, a boy-to-be named Christopher, a lawyer representing them, One of the defendants called it a terribly sad case, and the commentary from LifeSite is exactly right.
They said this is a perfect example of the vile eugenicist propaganda.
But it's actually not even just propaganda.
We've accepted this mindset.
It indicates that aborting a baby with trisomy 18 is necessary.
The reporter describes the aborted baby as what would have been her first child.
Because the boy was thought to have trisomy 18, he was thought to have no value, and so he was killed.
The doctor supported that conclusion.
The parents accepted that conclusion.
The press simply assumed it to be true.
The tragedy here is a double one.
That a baby boy was killed by abortion, and that the only reason that anyone regrets it is because it turned out that he didn't actually have a disability.
You see that?
This week, the BBC published a similar story.
Two couples have told the BBC they went through abortions after an NHS trust mistakenly told them that their unborn babies had serious genetic conditions.
They said, so here's a frank admission.
Number one, that unborn babies were aborted.
A revealing fact for a pro-abortion outlet like the BBC to admit.
And then two, that they were aborted because they were assumed that they had serious genetic conditions because they did not.
The methodical destruction of these children is transformed from, quote, a necessary termination to a, quote, tragedy, solely because of disability.
Another couple who spoke to the BBC aborted their baby at 24 weeks after being told she might have a genetic condition.
They first pursued tests to find out if they were carriers of the condition.
See, here we are with the eugenics stuff.
But the test results were delayed.
They called the hospital and were told that they had one day to decide whether or not to abort, as they were close to the legal limit of 24 weeks.
They put pressure on them.
They decided to have the abortion.
A post-mortem confirmed that the baby had been healthy.
A third family told the BBC that a last-minute scan On the day that they were due to have an abortion change their minds, they are now the parents of a healthy nine-year-old boy.
And I thought, oh, did they see what the baby looked like?
No, it wasn't even about that.
The abortion was booked because a couple said that they felt like there was only one choice to make.
Because their baby didn't appear to be emptying his bladder.
On the final scan, they said, they could see the baby had emptied his bladder.
So we didn't end.
The pregnancy.
Yeah, this is the face of eugenics that we're seeing.
And we've got a Democrat representative from Michigan, Laura Pahutsky, who has just sterilized herself as a protest against Trump.
Well, that was her choice.
You know, you've got a lot of choices in this life, things to choose from.
That's perhaps a better choice than her killing her baby.
And yet, when we look at Michigan, with all of the hand-wringing by the Washington Post and others, that you're not going to give money to migrants coming in here?
They rule that Michigan can ban Catholic counselors from helping gender-confused minors.
Now, this isn't even an issue of getting the money for the counseling.
They're calling it conversion therapy, and I've said for the longest time, the reason they call this conversion therapy is because this is targeted at Christians.
And this is the way that they're going to stop Christians.
It's not just Catholics, it's also Protestants that are there, says LifeSite News.
Who help to counsel minors who are suffering from gender confusion.
How'd they get gender confusion?
They got it at school.
Yeah, it is contagious, isn't it?
Seems to be a lot of it going around.
It's like the bird flu or something.
It is exactly like bird flu.
It's a psychological contagion.
It is a mind war.
It is a spiritual war.
And so they call it conversion therapy.
Because they want to convert you to their LGBT religion.
That is specifically protected.
But if you want to tell the child that they're in the right body, that is not allowed.
And so that is Michigan putting that ban on free speech, that ban on sanity, and compelling the grooming of children.
In contrast to the prohibition against what they call conversion therapy, because psychologists are not interested in converting anybody.
They just want to put you on the couch and let you talk for a fee.
In contrast, counselors are allowed to encourage minors to cross-dress, to change their pronouns, to engage in homosexual activity, or to get permanently sterilizing drugs or surgeries.
The law effectively silences counselors who are assisting minors to live a chaste and ordered lifestyle, while specifically protecting those who encourage gender confusion.
And disordered choices.
And so Michigan officials have previously targeted Catholic charities, not because of immigration stuff.
No, if they're encouraging people to come in, if they're taking government money and then bringing more people in to take more government money, that's all fine.
You know, living off of the government and getting paid to do that.
In 2022, their state health and human services settled with Catholic charities.
After punishing it, For prioritizing heterosexual married couples for foster child placement.
Now notice that this is about prioritizing.
It's not even saying that we will only put kids with heterosexual couples.
They are being punished because they prioritized it.
Prioritized it.
And so this article, when I first saw this, I thought, well, this is...
Treading on taboos.
A psychiatrist trains Christians to see the spiritual side of mental health.
Is that really what is going on here?
No.
I thought this was going to be somebody who was a psychologist and said, you know, psychology is just the study of the soul by people who deny the soul.
This is simply about treating us like animals and about manipulating Our mind, our consciousness, that is tied to our animal nature.
You know, the Bible talks about a soul, a body, but also talks about a spirit.
And spirit and soul are different.
Otherwise, what does it mean?
When he says the sword, the word of God is a sword, double-edged sword.
And it divides both joint and marrow and soul and spirit.
How do you divide something that's the same thing, right?
They're making a contrast between two different things.
And so I said, the fundamental problem with psychology, including people like Jordan Peterson and all the rest of these people, I mean, he's playing around with the concept.
Maybe I can find out more about Christ, but he doesn't want to know Christ, does he?
And so...
They're saying, well, we need to talk to these people who are pastors and tell them that they need some psychological help.
No, they need help from God, don't they?
They said, this is something that's really real.
Oh, you don't think that the Bible is real?
They said, we need to talk about spirituality and mental health.
You know, the Bible never talks about it that way, does it?
The Bible never talks about the mind separate from the spirit in that sense.
I said, mental illness is a real thing, like diabetes, like cancer, like high blood pressure that can be treated.
Well, you know, those are real things, aren't they?
They can be measured, and they can also be healed by prayer, can't they?
All of those things.
God's hand is not too short to heal all of those things.
Their motto that they put up on their thing was, Jesus plus therapy.
Jesus plus nothing, folks.
Jesus doesn't need therapy.
He can use anything that somebody's got out there.
He can use treatments that we have, but God heals.
We treat.
Never forget the king that, at the end of his life, Asa, who, he walked away from God.
Started out walking with God, trusting God to provide for him.
God gave him great victories against overwhelming odds, and then towards the end of his life, he decided that he didn't need God, and God called him out for that.
And then he gets sick in his later life.
Something happens with his foot, and the Bible just finishes his story by saying that.
So he went to a physician instead of to God to heal his foot, and he died.
I'm not saying you can't go to doctors.
Doctors might be the means by which God has ordained to heal you.
But what I'm saying is it's what you put your faith in.
You know, we're all back to that again, aren't we?
The faith office.
That's where we started.
So they said, we need to bring down the stigma of going to psychologists for people instead of going to Jesus.
So this person had this epiphany.
When she got the help of a fellowship and a $25,000 grant from the American Psychiatric Association Foundation while she was at Harvard.
Funny about that.
Yeah, these people don't have any answers.
They don't have any power.
Forget Paul White.
Forget these TV evangelists.
Forget these Harvard psychologists.
They're there just to discredit the truth in Christ.
This, I thought, was interesting.
The last one we'll do before we take a break.
This is a guy who suffered as one of these pro-life people that were politically persecuted by the Biden administration.
He said, God save me.
Now, he is grateful to Trump for getting him out.
Trump has no culpability in this person being in prison, unlike the J6ers.
So I'm glad that he got him out.
And I hope they do something to stop this.
But what he was saying about this God save me, he was talking about how God saved him through this persecution and this imprisonment.
And he said, you know, they weaponized something that went back, a law that went back to 1874.
And they weaponized that against us, the pro-life protesters.
In 1871, it was known as an act to enforce the provisions of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.
And for other purposes, they said.
And so they tried to – well, they did try it.
They did use that act in addition to the FACE Act against these people.
Notice that that was something that was set up to bring charges against the Ku Klux Klan.
That's why they mention an act to enforce the provisions of the 14th Amendment, because the 14th Amendment wasn't about anchor babies.
The 14th Amendment was about full citizenship for the freed slaves.
And so that's what they said.
We're going to enforce the provisions of the 14th Amendment for the citizenship of freed slaves against the Ku Klux Klan.
That was what it was always about.
And that, along with the Insurrection Act that Merrick Garland and others used, that was also around that time of Reconstruction.
And it was an abuse of that as well.
Merrick Garland appeared to be focused on prosecuting Peaceful pro-lifers, pro-abortion advocates, firebombed and spray-painted pro-life pregnancy centers, as we've pointed out many times.
And they said there were several things that were said in the trial.
One was that this trial was not going to be about abortion, regardless of what you think about abortion.
Forget about that, says the judge.
We just had a judge that wanted to get out of jury duty.
Maybe he said this because he wanted to get out of jury duty, but he said, I know, as a judge, when these people come before me, they're guilty.
Or they wouldn't be here.
So much for the presumption of innocence.
So much for the government having to prove its case beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt.
No, no.
If you're here, you're guilty.
And so, you know, they don't want to have fully informed juries.
They don't even want to have juries.
Why bother with a trial?
If the police bring them in, they're obviously guilty, right?
So he said, first of all, he told the jury, he said, this trial is not about abortion.
And they said, which was sort of ridiculous because that was the reason that we were there, to stop abortions and to love the mothers of children, but primarily to see if we could intervene and save the life of the babies.
And then saving the life of the baby often saves the life of the mother as well.
And so when he says that he was saved by God, this is what one of these people, his name is Goodman, said.
He was put in a unit.
That have been condemned.
And we've seen this with the J6 people.
The political prisoners, they always do this type of thing with them.
The pro-life people, the J6ers.
He said, we went over two weeks without toilet paper.
And some of the guys mentioned that some of the men who were there with so-called gender dysphoria, wearing dresses, could get mascara, lipstick, And perfume.
But we couldn't get toilet paper.
Oh, that's interesting, isn't it?
They do have their hierarchies, don't they?
And it's not just DEI. It's all political.
DEI is political, and what they were doing to these people.
You get your tranny?
Well, you get all your mascara, your lipstick, even perfume.
but if you were there as a pro-life prisoner, you don't even get toilet paper.
He said, one night I was on a high steel top bunk of a bunk bed.
That's about five and a half feet up and I was saying my prayers in bed and I fell asleep and I managed to roll over in my sleep and go right over the edge of the bed.
I was bleeding quite a bit.
I was unconscious, but one of the guards even told me later when they turned the lights on, it looked like a homicide scene.
There was so much blood.
But when I came back after 11 hours in the emergency room, some of the Hispanic guys in my unit and others They were seeing me, and they were making the sign of the cross, and they were shocked because everyone had thought I had died.
He said, but God saved me.
See, God got them through that.
And so we go through this life.
We may not be in prison, but this life is not about prosperity, folks.
And this life is not about the government that is trying to do this to us.
Guard Goldsmith.
Good to see you, Guard.
Liberty Conspiracy.
On Rockfin and Twitter, weekday evenings.
He says, pretty soon these false Christians will be telling us that the nation-state of political Israel is the same as religious Christian Israel, the followers of Christ.
Oh, they're saying that?
They're saying that all the time, aren't they?
Heron H., hi, all.
David, when I was pregnant with my son, they told me that he could have Downs, so I had an amniocentesis.
I can still feel the pressure of that needle.
My son was born healthy and is now 24. That's great news.
Glad to hear that.
Yeah, we decided not to do that because, you know, like I said, whenever they do a procedure, things can happen.
Michael Pomeroy, government denies the opportunity for us to be charitable by first stealing our life earnings.
Then sending it to organizations like NGOs to overthrow other governments.
And that is what is going on with USAID. Truly is amazing.
And it's good to see this stuff being stopped.
We're going to talk about that.
But I just want people to understand that right now, this is a big PR campaign being conducted by Trump and by Musk to get you to trust them.
And that's the way con men work.
They build trust.
They do good things.
They tell you the truth.
Until it's time for the con to happen.
And be careful.
Remember Admiral Akbar.
It's a trap!
Thank you.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, as I said earlier, is the government interested in climate control?
Are we going to stop this global warming?
Or are they simply trying to control us through the climate?
Well, obviously, that is it.
And even in The Daily Skeptic, they're getting a little bit skeptical of Trump's energy and climate agenda.
While they're hopeful that it's going to set some examples there, it said, beware.
Of overreach.
This is coming from the Daily Skeptic.
And that has always been my concern.
If you're going to leave us in the Paris Climate Accord, if you're going to leave these organizations like the EPA and you're going to fix it by putting Lee Zeldin in there, I'm sorry.
At best, that's going to be a temporary fix.
You need to shut this thing down.
You need to take these powers away from the federal government that doesn't have these constitutional powers in the first place.
You've got organizations that have been set up, that have been given Powers by Congress that they do not possess under the Constitution.
These are things that were never specifically delegated to the federal government, so they don't have these powers to give.
And these are powers to take away, via regulation, your automobile by looking at emissions, or take away appliances by looking at energy use, and on and on.
And so, they began on a positive note at the Daily Skeptic.
They said, look, he ditched the Paris Climate Agreement.
No, he didn't.
And that's where my trust issues began.
Because, you see, he is keeping us in a treaty that we were never legitimately in.
And he did that for four years the first time, and he's going to do it another year this time, he says.
Well, we'll see what happens.
We were never in that treaty.
He axed the Biden electric vehicle mandate.
Well, good.
But why'd he do that?
Elon Musk doesn't want his competitors to get the credits for that.
He prioritized fossil fuels and related infrastructure development, and he halted the leasing and permitting for wind energy projects.
Among energy realists not beholden to the cult of the climate alarmism, the praises for Trump's flurry of executive orders after inauguration were fulsome.
But this guy says, beware of overreach.
And I would say, just beware of leaving in place these institutions that have been running this stuff.
Because what you're going to see is you're going to see it repurposed in a different way.
You can end the EV subsidies, and then what you can do is you can enact subsidies for carbon sequestration pipelines that Doug Burgum, Kristi Noem, Donald Trump, and the...
Pipeline Company itself.
All of them were meeting in Mar-a-Lago, if you remember, before the election.
You can institute carbon taxes that Lucky Howard Lutnik wants to put in and Elon Musk wants to put in.
So you can keep this core issue here if you don't end it.
And you can just bring it back in different ways.
Last month was the hottest January on record, says the Daily Mail.
With global average temperatures hitting 13 degrees centigrade, about 55 degrees Fahrenheit.
Well, I would say I've got two responses to that.
Number one, prove it.
Prove it.
The hottest January on record.
Based on what?
Based on your cherry-picked data?
Based on your interpolated data?
Based on data that you don't have?
This is the whole issue.
With Climategate and many other things.
Look, they picked their starting date at a little mini winter in the mid-1800s.
If you go back and look at the climate information by many, many other methods, then you don't see this.
So they cherry-picked the method.
And then they don't have the data to start with.
You're going to go back to the 1850s?
Really?
You don't have anything before that?
No, you do have that, but you just don't want to look at it.
And as far as your temperature stations, as we said before, they've got a lot of these things listed in places now where there are heat islands.
I got them on airport tarmacs when they used to be very different, even if they put them in the middle of a city.
The cities are far more of a heat island than they used to be before, but it doesn't mean global warming.
And so I would say, first of all, you need to prove it.
Secondly, so what if it's true?
So what if it's true?
It's a non-issue.
It absolutely is a non-issue.
We can go back and we can look at how much colder, how much warmer the planet was.
Take a look at Greenland, for example.
The Great Green rebranding.
These people don't believe it either, because now they're shifting from saving the planet to creating jobs.
This is their new PR campaign.
But I say they don't believe it, because everything they do is hypocrisy.
If they do, they're...
Record amount of private jets being sold, as I reported last week.
Even as they tell us that we cannot have private cars, they're buying record numbers of private jets for themselves.
And so they've got to find a way to sell it to us because they've been predicting what's going to happen in the future.
And it's been a lie.
And all of this stuff about the end of the world is starting to get pretty old.
So now they've got to tell us that it's a way to create jobs.
Forget saving the planet.
Clean energy interests sharpen a different message.
Money and jobs, says Associated Propaganda.
The Associated Press.
For years, the climate movement has been selling itself as the last best hope to save the planet.
The latest rebranding effort is highlighted in an Associated Press report.
And attempts to reposition green energy as an economic juggernaut, promising jobs and prosperity rather than just lower carbon emissions.
Well, after all, the World Economic Forum is the economic forum, as I've said many times.
It's set up ten years to the day after the last victory of the Nazis by a bunch of Germans and people who were involved in handing over that victory to the Germans and Prince Bernhardt.
And others set it up at the spot where they had their last victory 10 years to the day after.
And what did they do that time?
Well, they decided if we want to take over the world, we've got to do it through economics because they had seen how effective that had been for the United States to be economically prosperous.
So-called economic benefits are little more than a political side of hand.
The green industry remains overwhelmingly reliant on government subsidies.
Tax incentives and regulatory mandates, because that's how Musk became the world's richest man.
You know, when we talk about regulatory mandates, we talk about government subsidies and everything, hey, he's doing a great job at Doge so far, perhaps.
We'll see what happens.
You know, there's been a lot of hype about immigration stuff, and Homan is talking tough and everything, but so far, a couple of weeks into this, the pace is way below what Obama did at the beginning of his administration.
So we'll see how much of this is PR and how much of it is reality.
But when it comes to getting rid of government waste, fraud, abuse, crony capitalism, Musk is the pro.
He became the world's richest man.
The world's richest man in history.
How did he do it?
Through government subsidies, tax incentives, and regulatory mandates.
So it takes one to know one.
And he certainly knows how the game is played, doesn't he?
So, the false promise of green jobs, as What's Up with that is talking about it.
You've got a former Republican congressman who is arguing that conservatives should embrace renewables because they, quote, create a lot of wealth, create a lot of jobs here in America.
This is what's known as the broken windows fallacy.
It's good for us to destroy everything and start it all over again.
And that's what this is really about.
But in this article, they recall Solyndra.
$500 million in federal funding.
Of course, that was just when they were just getting started.
That was a lot of money then, but now they've got bigger failures.
More recently, companies like Proterra, an electric bus manufacturer championed by the Biden administration, went under.
More broadly, studies have shown that for every green job created by the government, money, multiple traditional jobs are lost.
Due to increased energy costs and regulatory burdens.
You see, when the government incentivizes something, whether you're talking about charity or immigration or starts doing central planning of the economy, it never works out too well, does it?
And so that was Proterra.
There's been another one.
That was one electric bus company.
Of course, there was another electric bus company that went down the tubes even more recently.
The Biden administration.
I said if it was a bus, this is coming from What's Up With That, said if the Biden administration's green energy agenda was a bus, it would have no wheels, a dead battery, and a $160 million price tag.
And that's what we see with Lion Electric, a Canadian electric school bus company.
Yes, and that is spelled, by the way, L-I-O-N, not L-Y-I-N-G. That's what I will hear.
Let's fourth call it.
Lion Electric, just like I call...
Leon Panetta.
Lion Panetta.
So, this is a company that got $160 million in taxpayer-funded subsidies only to collapse into bankruptcy, leaving school districts across America high and dry.
As part of Biden's $5 billion clean school bus program, Lion Electric was awarded $159 million to produce 435 electric buses.
The administration touted it as a hallmark of the climate agenda.
Just imagine.
Fortunately for us, they went bankrupt, even with all that kind of money.
Imagine how much that would have cost if 435 electric buses cost $159 million.
It would have absolutely bankrupted us if they hadn't done it first.
Lion Electric has stopped manufacturing, has laid off its workforce, and it hasn't delivered $95 million worth of promised buses to 55 school districts.
But here's the worst part about it.
It was already in trouble before Biden started pouring money into it.
Does he know somebody that's there?
James Hansen, who himself has a long history of lies and false predictions, says that democracies require fixing in order to stop global warming.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC, defined a scenario which gives a 50% chance They keep warming under 2 degrees C. The 2 degrees C target is dead, he says, because the global energy use is rising and it will continue to rise.
And so he says global heating is likely to reach 2C by 2045 unless solar geoengineering is deployed.
This is one of the reasons why they say we're going to have net zero by 2050. They want us living in the dark ages, literally the dark ages.
Yeah, no appliances, no electricity use, any of the rest of the stuff.
They want net zero.
Of course, they will have their own personal power supplies.
They'll have their own personal nuclear plants, their Mr. Fusion.
It's not going to be small enough to fit in the back of their car, but they're going to have it attached to their factories.
Because, you know, as Donald Trump was saying, the grid, hey, that's really old.
Implying we're not going to fix it, right?
The grid's so old, you need to have your own power plant right there next to your manufacturing facility.
That's what you need.
James Hansen has a long string of predictions over the years.
Like this.
1986, he said global temperatures are predicted to increase an additional 3 or 4 degrees sometime between 2010 and 2020. Oh, okay.
So, it didn't happen.
Now he's predicting it's going to go to 2 degrees by 2045. Yeah, so he's narrowed the projection time that's out there, but he's taken it down a little bit, but he's lied about all this stuff.
In 1988, he said global warming will cause droughts.
In 2001, he said the West Side Highway will be underwater within 30 years.
Didn't happen.
In 2008, in 5 to 10 years, he said the Arctic will be free of sea ice.
And so there you go, in the summer.
Does that happen?
No.
Maybe that's why Trump wants to go to Greenland.
Maybe he still believes that.
Pretty soon, Greenland is going to be green.
And Iceland will be even greener.
Iceland is green.
Greenland is ice.
These are the false prophecies like Paula White and Julie Green.
It's been over five years since The Guardian officially introduced its climate change PSYOP. How is it going?
Asked Rhoda Wilson on Exposé News in the UK. And I'll just say, let's hope when we get to USAID, let's hope that The Guardian is one of these outlets that's getting a lot of money from the CIA through USAID. Let's hope that that's going to go away.
And so will The Guardian, because they have become the worst of propagandists.
More than five and a half years ago, The Guardian updated its House Style Guide.
What is a House Style Guide?
Well, that is what, when the AP goes out and says, you're not going to say pro-life, you're going to say anti-abortion rights.
And so they select the labels.
That gives them the rhetorical high ground to push whatever they want.
Ten years after ClimateGate broke, Damien Carrington, the Guardian's environment editor, announced in 2017 that instead of using climate change, the preferred term for the Guardian reporters would be climate emergency, crisis, or breakdown, and that global heating should be used over global warming.
That's how they try to push this stuff on people.
Alien poop evolution.
My ex wanted to send my son to therapy for nightmares and being afraid of the dark.
I told him about Jesus instead and the nightmare stopped.
That's a great story.
I like that.
Yeah, that's absolutely true.
Absolutely true.
David Strauss.
David, Dr. Kaufman, who you interviewed, has said that he had seen people healed from schizophrenia.
By chanting Bible verses, everything they heard, everything they heard voices.
I guess that means that they were also hearing voices.
Every time they heard voices.
Every time they heard voices.
That's right.
Yeah.
Sing a Christian song, too.
You know?
I mean, as long as it's a good one.
Not a Jesus is my boyfriend song.
Something's got some real meat in it.
Yeah, that's it.
Folks, you know, we look at this and we want to, even Christians have been so immersed, just like we're talking about euthanasia, we've been so immersed in this secular viewpoint that we think, well, if it's not measurable, it's not real.
Well, then where did the world come from, right?
There's something above us that created everything that we see that is real.
And that's the key thing.
But, of course, if you discount...
The miracles, if you discount the supernatural, then the Bible just becomes a bunch of fairy tales and a bunch of moralism.
And it's more than that.
There's real power in it, and we have seen it.
And you want to see it in a real simple way without all of the hopping up and down on stage and the chanting and all the rest of this stuff?
I mean, seriously, just read the biography of George Mueller.
I find that to be a real faith builder.
Because it's just a real simple account.
Read it every once in a while.
Just a real simple account about how God was in the life of and made himself known in the life of somebody who relied on him.
Things that he could not have done.
Things that were out of his control.
And he lived his life that way and kept his diary so that he could show people that God did not create the universe, wind it up like a clock, and take a vacation.
It's not how God operates.
Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
He says, I'm still waiting for the 2016 promise to harden the power grid and the infrastructure.
Yeah, that's right.
It may just go, that's like Trump said, it's vulnerable, and we're not going to do anything about it, are we?
Instead, we're going to poke monsters abroad to try to get them to do something to take it down.
He says, I guess what I really wanted was $500 billion spent on designed mRNA vaccines.
Yeah, we just didn't know that was what we really needed, was it?
Tom McDaw, guarantee these many nuclear plants will get sabotaged by activists.
Many meltdowns in populated areas.
Yeah.
Well, yeah, it's not enough that we've got these disease factories, these bioweapon research factories, a couple hundred of them, and accidents happening all the time.
That's why they stopped it all in 2014, and then Trump started it again in 2017. They needed an alibi, right, for what they were going to pull, their psych war.
They needed an alibi for that psych war, and they're still working on it.
But, you know, they do work with real disease.
They've got bacteria that they work with as well.
And they're going to keep those things there.
And then they'll add to those 200 different sites.
They'll add little miniature nuclear reactors there.
Don't frag me, bro.
Said the U.S. has enough oil and coal to be energy independent regardless of what China is doing.
China is not a shining beacon of anything other than oppression.
And that's why they have taken coal off.
That's why it is the number one public enemy of the globalists, because we've got so much of it.
We've got more coal than Saudi Arabia has oil.
We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
Good evening.
Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow, or more specifically, what comes out the other end.
Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
Carefully contrived to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
Is it merely a MacGuffin?
The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Let's take a look at...
A couple of reports out of China.
First of all, you've got a whistleblower coming out of China.
He wasn't working for the Chinese government, but he was there in Wuhan when it all began.
He said it all began in September of 2019. And, of course, it was a month later at the Milken Institute that they were asking Fauci, how do you get everybody to take a vaccine that hasn't been tested, right?
Well, we do it from the inside.
We do it with chaos, and we do it iteratively.
He said, Fauci, and that seems to be the way they operate everything.
This is an American who was in China.
He was about an 11-hour drive away from Wuhan.
He wasn't in Wuhan.
And this is how he describes the so-called outbreak of the SARS-2 quote-unquote virus.
I was actually living in China during the Wuhan virus outbreak, and it actually broke out in September of 2019.
But the rest of the world did not know about it.
And there's a very strong firewall.
I couldn't communicate with the outside world what I was witnessing inside of China.
And I can tell you, I was living up the street from a big hospital in China, and it was empty.
It was not like the fake news in the United States, I found out, was saying that there were people all over the hospital in China.
dying and everything.
No.
As a matter of fact, it was during that time of the Chinese New Year or that annual migration.
It's the biggest migration on Earth where everybody goes to the village and sees their family.
And I was in Guangzhou, China, and it was...
It was empty.
It was like a ghost town.
But it wasn't because of any lockdown.
It was because the people had all gone into the villages and everything.
And since this really wasn't a virus, it was a pandemic.
It was a psyop.
The people were fine in their villages.
And then when I escaped, the only reason I ended up here was because this was the only country that had borders open for flights out of China was Istanbul, Turkey.
And the Republic.
You know where that is, because it was the former Soviet Union.
I flew into Tbilisi, and then I noticed I was going up into the mountains in the Caucasus, and it was really weird, because in Tbilisi, which is the biggest city, they had the lockdowns, they had the comandante, you had to stay six feet apart, the masks, so they bought into it, because you know how the West influences here.
I was trying to tell people.
I went on television here live and I said, hey, listen, this is not what you think it is.
Anyway, of course, they said that stuff.
But what I noticed was when you went up into the mountains and you were with the villagers, there was no COVID. Like the Amish.
You have to watch TV. The cold virus has a mind of its own, and it only stays in big cities, and it doesn't attack people when they're in a restaurant and they're sitting down.
Once they've got their seat, they're okay.
They come out from 9 p.m.
Because you had to be in by 9 p.m., and then you couldn't come out until like 6 or 7 o'clock in the morning.
I said, wow, this doesn't make any sense.
Yeah, it didn't make any sense.
Yeah, you know, a thing I'd run into all the time.
I had to wear a mask in order to be seated at a restaurant.
But then once I was seated, I could sit there with my mask off as long as I wanted.
And I had privileges now.
I was now protected from the virus.
I could stand up and I could go to the bathroom.
I could walk around.
No problem.
I didn't have to put the mask on when I was walking around.
And I called out a...
A couple of different restaurant owners over this.
I wouldn't go to the chains because these people don't care, but I thought, well, maybe if I go to a restaurant that's owned by a small business owner, they'll do that.
And so I had them bring up the manager in one of these restaurants.
The other one was the one who was telling me I had to do it.
And the other one, I called him up and I said, all right, look at these people, right?
They're sitting here close to each other.
They're not that far from each other.
You're telling me I got to wear masks in order to go six feet.
And I said, this is nothing other than compliance with arbitrary rules.
And he goes, yeah, that's right.
That's what it is.
Yeah, you've got to wear your mask or leave.
I said, well, you'll never see me again.
And that's the key thing.
And now you've got people in China that are being given prison sentence for showing what happened with all of this stuff.
But as he said, you know, wow, this doesn't make any sense.
Here in America.
It was even worse.
You know, he says, well, I'll go up in the mountains.
What was it in the mountains?
Well, just like the Amish, they didn't have TV, so they didn't see anything that was happening there.
There wasn't any propaganda to make them afraid.
And so the people in the mountains were not afraid.
But when you look at America, and you look at stuff that didn't make any sense, This is really the key thing here.
These dancing TikTok nurses.
You know, just remember this.
Remember this because they're coming back after us with Burt flu or whatever else.
They got their guy in the White House, Donald Trump, and he'll do this all to us again, folks.
They're just biding their time.
Right now he's going through a process to get your confidence so he can pull this kind of stuff on you.
These big choreographed.
Look at this.
They got dolly shots.
This is a dolly shot.
It's professionally done.
I mean, it's ridiculous what they did with all of this stuff.
But just as a reminder, a Chinese filmmaker has been sentenced to three and a half years in prison for documenting the COVID tyranny.
So, what was this about?
This is a 33-year-old who was talking about this.
This is a crime.
Was to create a film called The Middle Road.
Yurum Kwai.
The Middle Road.
It showed a glimpse of the Chinese government's tyrannical crackdown.
Featured the white paper protests.
Remember that?
When they would just hold up white pieces of paper.
Because the Chinese Communist Party is going to censor anything they have to say.
So it's like, yeah.
Totally redacted.
The protest movement was sparked by a deadly apartment fire in Urumqi, which claimed at least 10 lives, reportedly due to COVID lockdown measures, that prevented both the escape of the inhabitants and timely rescue efforts.
They've locked down everybody.
They seal people in their apartments.
There's an apartment fire and everybody dies.
Street vigils cropped up in late November 2022 to remember the deceased.
And it morphed into protests that caught on in several major cities of China, including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and others.
The protests became an outlet for the indignation and the anguish caused by the draconian policies countrywide.
The protests called for an end to Xi Jinping's zero COVID policies.
And so now we've got zero climate policies, right?
Net zero.
Zero COVID, net zero, same thing.
They'll lock you down and kill you.
And they don't care.
They don't care if you don't have food.
Just like they don't care if you can't get out if there's a fire.
So, at the time, Chinese expert Steve Mosher warned that the deadly toll from Shanghai's ongoing lockdowns would be much greater than any potential lives lost during COVID and predicted deaths by starvation, by strokes, by heart attacks, by medical neglect here in the United States.
As well as by heinous treatments that folks will be remembered like the blood leaching of George Washington and giving him mercury.
That's what remdesivir and ventilators were.
You look at this stuff and say, how could somebody bleed these people to death back then?
Well, how in the world, said pulmonologists and other people who are respiratory experts, how in the world, Could you justify putting somebody on a ventilator, an intubation ventilator, when they've got these respiratory issues?
They said, we've never treated them like that.
And, of course, they killed almost all the people that they did with that.
The ventilators that Trump is so proud of and Peter Navarro is so proud of, they've got blood on their hands.
And they richly rewarded.
The hospitals to get them to kill people.
I mean, you identify somebody as COVID and you put them on there, you've already made a profit before you even start charging them for the use and getting your 20% bonus.
These people in Shanghai, we showed many pictures of that.
People just screaming at night in the city.
And then he had some of these protests, the white paper protests.
They didn't have anything on the papers, but they were saying, we want dignity, we want the truth, we want human rights.
You see, they understood instinctively what this was about.
It was about behavioral psychology, B.F. Skinner, beyond freedom, beyond dignity.
Not treating us as humans, but treating us as animals and manipulating us.
And so, you think that's over?
No.
Both Republicans and Democrats are still doing this stuff, but they're doing it now with bird flu.
They're building their way up to all of this.
Whether they're going to do it with bird flu or whether bird flu is a preparatory step, we don't know exactly how they're going to do it.
But as long as we don't call them out and oppose them on this, they will do it again.
Governor Hochul in...
New York has ordered a temporary shutdown of live bird markets in multiple New York areas due to bird flu.
As we said over and over again, history doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme.
And so now what they're doing is they're locking down bird markets.
And it's not, you know, instead of locking people down, they are killing birds now instead of killing people for the moment.
And you've got Republicans and Democrats doing the same thing.
In New York, you've got Governor Hochul, who is doing this.
And the same thing has already been done by Republican Governor Brian Kemp in Georgia.
He shut down all movement of poultry.
Hochul has announced this morning that she ordered the temporary shutdown of all live bird markets in New York City, Westchester, Nassau, Suffolk.
Inspectors detected seven cases of bird flu.
That doesn't mean that any bird is sick.
During routine inspections, where they're going around with their little PCR magnifiers, found them in Bronx, Brooklyn, and Queens.
Hochul said she issued the order out of an abundance of caution.
I think we've had more than an abundance of caution.
I think we're drowning in caution and fear, and have been for years with all this stuff.
This was sent to me by Geese Busters.
Again, this duck farm on Long Island.
This guy has turned into a big-time vaccine cheerleader now.
And as Geese Busters pointed out, there was an interview with him just a few years ago where he's saying, Yeah, this has been around for four generations.
I'd really like to just cash out of this and sell off the land.
And now he is, maybe, he's going to get a contract with...
Some of these vaccine makers, because it sounds like he's doing a PR campaign for the vaccines.
The Crescent Duck Farm owner, he said, the vaccine is essential to protect poultry against bird flu.
Now, you know what is essential?
Poultry are not dying from bird flu.
They're dying from the USDA killing them.
We need to protect poultry from the USDA, because they want to kill our food supply.
And I think there's three things that they want out of this.
Number one, they want to kill our food supply.
Number two, they want to get the mRNA into us through our food supply.
And one of the ways that they have to do that is to shut down the small independent farms and backyard livestock.
To make sure that nobody but the big guys exist and the big guys will put the mRNA into the food supply for them.
I think that's what this is all about.
At this point.
And so, this was the farm, the last farm, duck farm, that was on Long Island.
They had 100,000 ducks.
This guy, again, wanted out.
And as Geese Busters points out, hey, look, if they're worried about wild migratory birds, he's got a humane way without killing them to get them out of there.
But I don't think it's even about that.
Have any of you seen birds falling out of the sky?
Around your house or anything?
I haven't seen any dead birds anywhere.
So, this is not something that we have to worry about being carried around by wild birds.
This is something that we have to worry about the U.S. government doing to us.
The USDA is doing the same thing that the Communist Chinese government did to people back in 2019. So, this guy owns a duck farm.
His name is Doug Corwin.
He says that the USDA's policy of euthanizing flocks when avian flu is detected is not working.
Well, it doesn't make any sense.
It really doesn't make any sense.
You would quarantine them, wouldn't you?
You know, if you want to follow their paradigm, if you've got a bird that tests positive, why wouldn't you just seal that one off instead of all of them?
Seal that one farm off and see what happens.
Because they don't want you to see what happens.
You would see that none of them died.
But let's say that they did die.
Let's say that you had a really bad, virulent disease and 10% of them died.
That would be really high.
That's a much higher case fatality rate than they have reported from any of their other imagined epidemics.
And I say imagined epidemics because I don't believe this stuff anymore.
Any of it.
But let's say there was a 10% case fatality rate.
Well, they're going to come in and they're going to do a 100% fatality rate.
How could it be any worse than that?
No, you quarantine them and see what happens.
They don't want you to see what happens.
He said effective vaccines are available and it's time to allow their use.
Are they?
How do we know that?
Have the vaccines been tested?
No.
Have your birds been tested?
No.
The PCR thing is not a test, number one.
Number two, they didn't test each and every bird.
They just killed all the birds.
After they find out, we got one, kill them all.
But the vaccines have not been tested for adverse reactions.
They've not been tested for safety in the food supply.
And they've not been tested to see if they are effective.
As a matter of fact, they haven't even isolated this virus.
They never do.
That's why I don't believe in the so-called science.
Because science would isolate this.
And if you did science, you would have different groups.
And you'd say, hey, look, we've identified this.
Isolate this, and we can see that it's present in large amounts, and people who are sick, they've never done that.
Corwin is asking federal officials to push for changes in USDA policy to allow farmers the protection of vaccines for their flocks.
Yeah, let's give them something that's not been tested for efficacy or safety.
He said without that protection, he questions the wisdom of working to rebuild his flock in the hopes of resuming production.
Let me just say, if this guy gets back into business, And you live in New York.
You might want to avoid duck.
Who knows what else this guy's putting in his ducks.
A vaccine, he believes, is now necessary to keep the farm business going forward.
No, what is necessary?
We've got to inoculate ourselves against out-of-control public health and against out-of-control bureaucracies.
With avian flu spreading rapidly across the country, carried by wild birds, there may be no level of biosecurity that can prevent an infection.
Absolute nonsense.
And here again, it's like every other paragraph.
We need a vaccine, he wrote.
And so this whole thing over and over again in this local paper that it's vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, vaccine.
Well, the great American egg crisis.
is looming over Trump.
This is from the UK Telegraph.
And Reason has said, well, Trump can't lower the price of eggs any more than Biden could.
And what they mean by that is they can't do anything about inflation.
Well, that may be true enough once they've set this thing in massive expansion, the money supply and other things that they've done with it, the debt and all the rest of the stuff, they may not be able to stop it.
You had all the king's horses and all the king's men couldn't put Humpty Dumpty back together again during Nixon, Ford, and Carter.
But the reality is that Trump could do something to affect the price of eggs, because the price of eggs is not generalized inflation.
This is government-manufactured inflation by the USDA's policies.
Why isn't Trump doing something about the price of eggs, you might ask yourself?
You should ask yourself that.
And what does that portend for the future when he's not going to do anything to stop that?
It's this insane policy conducted by the USDA of killing millions of birds and creating egg shortages that they won't do anything about.
No, the president can and should do something about it because it's the president's agency that's creating the problem.
Hardened criminals in Pennsylvania reported this.
They just stole 100,000 eggs.
Well, this is kind of like the war on drugs, isn't it?
Very much like it.
Thieves from the USDA are stealing eggs and raising prices.
That's what's really happening.
It's war on virus.
Are they using a supposed virus to wage war on us?
The same.
During a campaign stop in August, Trump delivered a press conference surrounded by meat and condiments and milk and eggs, in which he pledged to immediately bring prices down, starting on day one.
Well, real simple.
Killed the USDA on day one.
They're still not even talking about that.
I've not seen this on any of the hit lists of them.
They're saying, well, the next thing on the list is the Department of Education.
I think that needs to go as well.
Nothing about the USDA or this nonsense about the bird flu, and I think that speaks very loudly.
It's like the dog that did not bark.
But after securing victory, Trump went into expectation management mode, saying it's hard to bring things down once they're up.
He's claimed that he can bring down food inflation through a mixture of boosting energy production, deregulation, and pressuring the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates.
It's real simple.
You want to get rid of some regulations?
Get rid of the USDA. They're the ones who are creating this artificial disruption to our food supply.
And so the Telegraph says, farmers are slaughtering millions of chickens.
No.
No, they're not.
The U.S. government is.
It's like all this stuff where Trump, oh, well, you know, he was doing great, but it was COVID killed the economy.
No, Trump killed the economy with his boneheaded edicts.
That he paid people to do.
And farmers are not slaughtering millions of chickens.
The USDA is slaughtering millions of chickens.
And when you look at the count, tens of millions.
In January, U.S. poultry producers killed a staggering 14 million egg-laying hens.
That's just one month.
In January.
In December, that number was 13 million.
How long can we go with our government killing 13-14 million chickens a day?
A month, rather.
When are they going to kill the food supply entirely?
And then the conclusion of the telegraph is that avian influenza not only spreads quickly, it kills quickly, too.
Wow.
There's so many lies in just those two sentences, isn't it?
No, in January, U.S. poultry producers killed.
No, the USDA killed them.
Killed 14 million.
December, 13 million.
This is not a virus that is spreading quickly.
The birds are not dying from that.
They're dying from the USDA. The USDA is spreading.
They're spreading out with their PCR devices and their lies.
And these are the people who are selling the lies for them.
This is Scientific American.
You can put scientific in air quotes.
Saying the U.S. is not ready for bird flu in humans.
Bird flu is infecting more people than we think.
Be afraid.
Be very afraid.
Because we don't have any idea.
Unless you watch TV or read trash like Scientific American, you wouldn't know any of this.
We need to stop it now before a new pandemic begins, they said.
Right after Trump took office, amid a flurry of executive orders and agency upheavals, the administration told the CDC not to release any reports of communications until one of Trump's people could take a look at them.
But Scientific American, listen to how scientific they are.
This virus is versatile.
This virus is mutating.
It's everywhere.
It's got a mind of its own.
Sure, the risk of human epidemic is still considered to be low, but widespread human-to-human disease hasn't been proven, but viruses are the masters of adaptation.
And they also keep changing their stories, just like liars do, don't they?
This is amazing.
Scientific American is about as scientific as Fauci is.
Our agriculture and food safety systems are riddled with loopholes.
That allowed this virus to spread.
How did we ever make it before we had the USDA? How did we ever have any food?
Why didn't all Americans die with these loopholes that we have in our food supply?
We need to regulate everything!
Change your name from Scientific American to Authoritarian American.
That's what this really is.
They said in March of 2024, H5N1, Started appearing in dairy cows.
Doesn't that sound scientific?
H5N1. You would never know.
They never isolated this.
You'd think that they had isolated this thing and studied it, sequenced it, had all this.
No, they don't have any of that stuff.
I can't wrap my head around how hard it would be to vaccinate thousands of chickens, he said.
Well, that's where they want to go, isn't it?
They want to vaccinate our food supply because we're not rolling up our sleeve anymore for these people.
So they've got to come after it in a different way.
Before Biden left office, HHS gave Moderna $590 million to make an mRNA-based vaccine for bird flu, calling it a move to strengthen pandemic preparedness.
You see, here's the tag team aspect.
Interesting.
Trump created and funded the vaccines, and then he hands it off to Biden to roll with it and to bring a lawyer into HHS. To lawyer up and to bribe and coerce and intimidate people.
Well, now Biden is returning the favor.
You know, it's a tag team thing.
So he's going to fund the bird flu vaccine and hand that off to Trump.
You know, it is interesting, I think, that no talk yet about...
CDC or NIH that I've seen, really.
They're focusing on the CIA. And again, that is their enemies.
We'll see what happens with all of that.
But they need to be shutting down the people that are trying to shut down our food supply.
Trump administration slashes and burns the federal government, says, quote-unquote, Scientific American.
The agencies that are designed to uphold the health and the welfare of both humans and the animals we use for food.
And so he says, I'm preparing for a repeat of their COVID response.
Well, you know what?
Me too.
Me too.
I think they're going to repeat their COVID response.
How in the world did we ever survive without public health agencies and bureaucracies?
Yeah, we were a lot healthier without them.
Well, we're going to take a break, and when we return, we're going to talk about chemo.
Some chemo news, chemotherapy news, which is really vital.
I know a lot of people have cancer and a lot more that have gotten it since the vaccine went out.
My father was killed by chemo, not by cancer.
So we're going to talk about that when we come back.
DGA, thank you for the tip.
David, did you see the video of Paula White saying, to say no to Trump would be saying no to God?
Yeah, I know, yeah.
And anybody who tells you to deny yourself, there.
Satanic.
That's what Jesus said.
Jeff Berwick would be a great guest.
Your audience would love what's really going on.
I'll have to look him up.
He also says, David Mexico is not participating in the bird flu hoax.
Eggs are $1.29 a dozen.
They are always attacking our food supply.
Yeah, it is.
It's such a scam.
And, you know, and it is as obvious, isn't it, as the dancing TikTok nurses?
You see it.
We've got to make sure that other people see it as well.
This has got to be stopped.
This is a full-on destruction while the MAGA people are out there saying, look at how we're winning!
While their food supply is being shut down by the federal government.
We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
Here's a little song I wrote.
You might want to hear it in your pod.
You'll owe nothing.
And be happy.
Ain't got no cash.
Ain't got no car.
But 24 booster shots in your arm.
Oh, nothing.
Be happy.
You can't even buy shit in the store because of your low social credit score.
Own nothing.
Be happy.
You'll own nothing.
And be happy.
Be happy and eat the bugs.
They're doing what?
In the place they named after me?
Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
Making sense common again.
This is the David Knight Show.
Well, welcome back.
Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
Good to see you there.
He says, COVID was...
By the way, he sent me a link.
He had an interview with a guy who is a...
You know, we have Elvis impersonators.
We also got James Brown impersonators.
And the guy had really good moves.
I've got to show you some of the interview that he had with him.
But he said, COVID was also low among the homeless.
Vitamin D protected from whatever was going around.
You know, that's the thing.
It's like, homeless people are not dying in the streets.
The wild birds are not dying in the streets.
They should be the canaries in the coal mine, right?
Except none of this stuff.
Well, we have, when Trump signed the bill to keep men out of women's sports, he surrounded himself with a lot of little girls.
And you had Alex Phillips last week put this up and said, giving girls back their safety, their integrity, their sports.
I'm not crying, honestly.
Really?
Is that the most important thing?
Girls sports is the number one thing.
Well, Bob Moran said, well, here's your guy keeping the girls safe.
You know, the same guy who plans to inject them all with AI-assisted mRNA poison as soon as possible.
So now when their hearts explode halfway through a race, at least they won't be overtaken by a massive hairy man, because that's all that really matters.
That is absolutely true.
Talk about misplaced priorities and stuff.
Yeah, sexualize them all you want.
You know, sexualize the boys and everything.
Just keep them out of the women's sports.
That's the key thing.
Norway, sounding the alarm as scientists link COVID vaccines to global death surge.
You know, there was an article up on Drudge Report warning people about getting too excited during the Super Bowl.
So they said, you know, you're going to have heart attacks.
And, you know, heart attacks are rising with sports events.
Even the spectators, you know, the athletes, we never saw that before.
They're selling this to you as being normal.
But Norway says scientists link COVID vaccines to the global death surge.
We've seen this over and over again.
And we know what is really pushing all of that.
But I wanted to, and now they're dropping hints about Ebola as well, and just remind you.
of what happened with Shelly Luther and Clay Jenkins in Dallas.
You know, this is somebody who wanted to keep her hair salon open during COVID, and they wanted to lock her up.
Clay Jenkins was the county judge, which is the highest elected official in the county.
And yet, when Ebola came to town...
He told everybody, don't worry about it.
We've got football games going on.
We've got Houston and Dallas are playing each other.
We've got lots of doctors and lots of hospitals.
Nobody cares about any of this stuff.
They did everything they could to normalize Ebola, and yet they did everything they could to, and you had people die of that.
So, whatever was happening with that.
But in January, a 32-year-old nurse Working in Kampala.
Died from Ebola, they say.
And so we all need to be very concerned.
So the CDC is now telling everybody, be on the lookout.
Be on the lookout for Ebola.
The CDC has confirmed there's been no cases of Ebola detected in the U.S., but because one person in Uganda died at the end of January.
We've got to be concerned about that.
But let's talk about the scourge, the pandemic.
Of the medical community.
As I've said over and over again, there was nothing that leaked out of the lab.
And we know that.
We know that because we don't see the homeless people dying.
We don't see the children dying unless they get the vaccine.
And so they said, oh, it only affects old people.
Well, they've never told us that lie before.
It only affects people who are at or beyond life expectancy with two and a half comorbidities.
And so we saw two weeks of that in Italy and then...
Trump dropped the hammer on us.
But the reality is, is that it is the medical community that is one of the biggest causes of death, not just with the bioweapon vaccine.
But with standard things that have been around for a very long time, this is Dr. Paul Merrick talking about chemo.
Chemotherapy prolongs life about two to three months.
Two to three months.
That's the sum benefit.
For some cancers, such as gastric cancer, it actually reduces life expectancy.
Chemotherapy is a hoax.
It's a hoax perpetuated by big pharma to make money at the expense of...
People who suffer.
There are a few cancers, maybe 5-8%, in which chemotherapy actually cures the cancer.
But the vast majority of cancers, the common cancers, breast cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, the performance of chemotherapy is appalling.
But it generates billions of dollars.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, listen to that.
And how does it generate billions of dollars?
Well, Dr. Peter Glidden talks about how that happens.
Drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of.
So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes, more or less.
The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, Insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference.
And there ought to be a lot.
The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it.
Period.
It doesn't work 97% of the time.
If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business?
No.
This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.
When women get together and do a 5K run for breast cancer, all of that money, do you think any of that money goes to nutritional research?
Do you think any of that money goes to homeopathic research or acupuncture or traditional Chinese medicine or naturopathic research?
No.
All of it goes to drugs and surgery, which do not work.
Except to make people rich, of course.
And I'm not going to play it because we're getting short on time.
I want to talk about what's happening with this backdoor stuff.
And I've got Goatree that's going to be joining us at the top of the hour.
He said it has been a very entertaining...
First couple of months here for him as somebody who is involved in cybersecurity and things are getting really crazy.
But we're going to talk about the implications of what's happening with the back doors everywhere.
That's the way Big Brother gets in.
You know, you leave the back door unlocked and you're going to find an intruder in your home.
Who knows what that intruder is going to do?
Well, we know what the governments are doing with this kind of stuff.
But I'll just mention one more.
This is Dr. Kathleen Ruddy.
I'm not going to play the clip.
It's a little bit longer.
And she's talking about ivermectin.
It's safer than a sugar pill.
You have to take a lot of it to make yourself sick.
And she's had some good results from that.
And so I'll mention that.
Still, it's a pharmaceutical.
It does have adverse effects.
We have...
A lot of cases and testimony, as G. Edward Griffin talked about B-17 apricot seeds, and of course you can get those at rncstore.com, and you can get the books that talk about what people have done with it.
And as Peter Glidden is saying, all that money that they get, nobody's going to pay for any studies to show the effectiveness of apricot seeds.
I can't make any money off of apricot seeds.
You can get them fairly cheaply, and they don't have any adverse effects.
They're even safer than ivermectin.
You know, when we talk about something being a sugar pill, or as Alex called the vaccine, sugar water, just think about that.
You know, think about something that is safe that people have had good results with.
Try that.
You know, if I had cancer, I'd be taking ivermectin.
I'd be taking absolutely the apricot seeds before I would take the ivermectin.
See what was happening with it.
But try all the stuff that is safe, that is relatively safe.
Apricot seeds don't have any adverse effects.
And I would try all that before I would try anything else because I've had my family, as I said, my father died from his first Chemo dose.
Put him in a coma, he never recovered.
And it's unfortunate, because if he had known about B17 and apricot seeds, perhaps that would have worked.
None of the stuff that they were doing to him was going to work, but it killed him right away.
So again, go to rncstores.com, use the code 10%OFF, but open yourself up.
Do some of these safe and effective things.
You know, even if you wanted to do some of the pharmaceutical stuff, at least do this other stuff.
Of course, there's other things, too.
An alkaline diet.
Many different things that are there, but people always want to take whatever the pharmaceutical companies are because they have such a high view of so-called science.
And there's no science in it at all.
Well, before we get Goat Tree on, I just want to talk a little bit about something that was interesting that's happening with finances.
We've got a third of all U.S. states are now looking at Bitcoin and crypto for public funds.
Now, whether or not Trump does a federal Bitcoin reserve, you've got 16 states that are now looking at this.
And I thought, well, how does that stack up with gold?
And the only one that I could find, I know that some states are looking into it, but the only one that I could find where they have authorized the state government to buy gold is Utah.
You know, Texas has got its gold depository, but that's for people who want to put their gold in it instead of maintaining custody themselves.
A similar thing, they were trying to get in Tennessee.
I don't know what's going to happen with it now that Senator Nicely's gone, but he was also trying to get authorization for the state treasurer to buy gold, but that didn't go through.
So now you've got all these states that want to get into something that is very volatile.
And what's the problem with that volatility?
Whatever happens with Bitcoin, it has been incredibly volatile.
And so even if this thing is trending up with a very noisy line, you may need to get that money out when it's really down.
And that's the concern with this stuff.
Why wouldn't they focus on gold rather than that?
And it's just the get-rich-quick mentality.
They want to look like they're trendy and hip.
I think it's really irresponsible.
They ought to be looking into gold.
is the closest one to potential implementation.
Again, they have already implemented this for gold.
Whether or not the state has actually bought any gold to hold in reserve, not clear.
They've authorized it.
But then that is something that is up to the executive branch to do.
But the state, Utah's Blockchain and Digital Innovation Amendments Bill was passed and recommended on third reading by the Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee.
With a majority vote of 8 to 1. Very strong support.
And as they're saying, it would authorize the state treasurer to allocate up to 5% of public funds, which is half of what they've allocated for gold, to allocate funds to, quote, qualifying digital assets.
They didn't even specifically limit it to Bitcoin, but what they did say, they had a requirement that it had to have over $500 billion in market cap.
Hopefully to keep them away from some of these junk meme coins like Trump's coin and things like that.
The only digital asset that has more than $500 billion in market capitalization is currently Bitcoin.
So they think that that was, you know, they put that in there deliberately.
But still, what happens if...
Bitcoin, as volatile as it is, drops with a market cap below $500 billion.
Do they have to liquidate it then at that loss?
Gold is just continuing.
It goes up and down, but it's continuing its rise.
Gold achieves a historic six-week rally, setting new records.
Maybe your state's not going to hold it, but there's nothing stopping you from holding.
Gold as a reserve, as an insurance against what may come.
Tony Arterman has set up davidknight.gold.
That'll take you to Wise Wolf Gold, and you can start accumulating gold as reserve on a regular basis.
Just decide how much you want to set aside each month, and he will do that for you.
I don't know anybody else that does anything like that.
Of course, you can buy it, gold or silver, large amounts.
You can transfer from Bitcoin into gold and vice versa without a fee.
That's something new that he's...
And so it's a great place to try to get out of the system and to get into something that is real.
So that's the key thing.
When we look at digital, it's just too easily manipulated, I think.
And, of course, they're manipulating the price of gold as well.
But it is physical, which makes it a little bit harder for them to do that.
Don'tFragMeBro says, About the dead internet and where the powers that be are with super nanocomputers.
All right, we'll ask him that.
And I guess maybe you mean quantum computing and things like that, perhaps.
I saw something where they were saying that if they get quantum computing, of course, they're not, I don't think they're really close to it.
I'll see what Goatree thinks because I don't follow that stuff that closely.
But, you know, the...
The whole thing about quantum computing allows them to break cryptography.
And so the early Satoshi coins that have been taken out of circulation, somebody was saying, hey, we could reactivate those and put them back into circulation because, you know, Bitcoin would have to adapt.
And if you've got these old coins, if somebody, supposedly, if they could find them, they could decrypt them.
I don't know.
But I think we're a ways off from that happening.
We're a ways off from them telling people that it's happening.
We'll say that.
At least what they're telling everybody is that it's a ways off.
And so we're going to take a quick break.
Do we have a gold tree yet?
Okay, all right.
So we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
Stay with us.
That's right, boys and girls.
There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense is.
Go to davidknight.gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn.
He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
Wahoo! Yark!
The ot...
Edward Snowden's another case.
He is a criminal, man.
The laws may have changed, but he still violated the oath, the secrecy that he took.
It is illegal to classify a crime.
This is actually in the U.S. Code.
You cannot classify a program for the purpose of keeping it from the American people if it is a criminal act.
By nature of what we do, there's five other reasons to classify the act.
But if the act is illegal at its core, it can't be classified.
He was exposing crimes committed against Americans.
He was exposing a program to collect bulk data.
Yeah, but that was being collected against Americans.
It was being collected for the purposes of identifying terrorist activity.
Why does the government need my metadata?
Why do they need a facility so huge that they have to build a new place in the Utah wilderness to hold data to last 500 years?
What do they need my data for?
Not only does the Do you know who the first person was to pose that question in a public venue?
If I'm not doing anything illegal, then who cares?
It was Joseph Goebbels.
And I don't want to go down that road.
road.
I believe in individual freedoms.
I believe that government works for us, that government should be responsive to us, not that we should fear government.
Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, dear Klaus, your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate, but It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our societies. followed closely by polarization within our societies.
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You are listening to The David Knight Show.
Good evening.
Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow.
Or, more specifically, what comes out the other end.
Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
Carefully contrived to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
Is it merely a MacGuffin?
The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
And joining us now is Gautry.
Good to have him on.
He was a little bit slow to answer the phone because he said we showed up as telemarketers.
Tell us a little bit about how do we look when we're giving you a call because we're doing an over-the-phone interview.
How did it show up on your side?
Well, you know, we're going to be talking about this lunatic English judge.
And I'm sitting here prepped for that, and you're showing up as a telemarketer from Oxford, England.
And I'm like, oh no, they've already got me?
Well, you're not paranoid if they're actually paying attention to you, right?
And so what we're going to talk about is this situation coming out of the UK. It's Big Brother through the back door.
And Goatree really wanted to talk about this, and I do too.
It is...
Okay, so I'll set it up in just a little bit, and you can fill in the details.
This is a court case out of the UK telling Apple that they have to give them full access to all of the encrypted information that's on iCloud and other places like that.
A very, very dangerous precedent.
And, of course, even if other countries don't follow this same precedent against other companies, We're part of Five Eyes with them.
And so anything that the UK government gets, they can share with the CIA or the NSA or these American government entities because that's the whole purpose of Five Eyes.
They set this thing up and they use it.
This partnership saying, well, we'll give you the stuff that you're not legally allowed to collect, but we don't have any prohibition on it.
And so you can spy on Americans.
Of course, they do it as well.
But if they get caught, they've got some legal jeopardy.
But the Brits can do it, and they can hand all that information over to the CIA or the NSA or whoever wants it in the American government.
The same arrangement that they've got with corporations.
And so there's this revolving door that even if they followed the law, and even if we had stringent laws, they've got ways to get around it.
So, yeah, tell us what you know about this, Gautry.
Well, now, you know, I'm not an expert on English law.
But the way I'm reading this is they are asking Apple to deactivate all their encryption on these cloud servers.
Well, okay, it's bad enough that we're dealing with the government and the CIA and the Five Eyes and all these other people, but if you disable this encryption, now you've added another aspect of it.
Hackers.
I mean, you know, in theory, people don't practice very good online safety.
Pretty much everybody's passwords are the same.
No one goes through the trouble of changing passwords.
And all this information is available on the dark web.
Yeah, we've talked about that before with infrastructure, when you talk about the different devices that are out there on the railroads, as well as a more trivial example.
Or the road signs that are out there, they ship with a de facto password, and they don't bother to change it, and that's why people can go around and put up signs saying, Raptors ahead, beware there's zombies on the highway ahead, and that type of thing.
But it can be really serious if somebody gets the default password for some switching circuitry on a train track or something, or, as you've pointed out, They have these little shacks, and if they've changed the password, they'll just write the password on the shack wall so that it's not inconvenient for somebody coming in there.
So, yeah, you're talking about people being very careless with security issues like that.
But, you know, Goatree, even if the stuff is encrypted, and even if only the UK government had it, governments are getting broken into all the time anyway.
I mean, the NSA got hacked, the CIA got hacked.
I'm sitting here like there's some insignificant British magistrate, judge, whatever they call these guys, wears a goofy little wig that looks worse than Maxine Waters telling Apple that they have to do away with all their encryption and Put my stuff at risk.
I'm sitting here thinking, okay, dude, I'm sitting here in Texas and I know some black hat skills.
Maybe I'll just hack you and see how you like that.
You see, these people, they're totally out of control right now.
They don't think through their actions.
They've got some income.
And you know what?
If you read what I sent you...
It's illegal for us to talk about this.
We could be put in jail.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
And they have said that they will, you Americans, you know, the stuff that you're talking about, we'll come and get you, that type of thing.
But, yeah, they've threatened Americans out of the UK. And, of course, the UK is really kind of hanging their hat, or I guess we could say they're hanging their wig.
Being the worst tyrants anywhere.
I mean, they've gone full into all of this climate change stuff.
Their utilities are like four to five times higher than they are for the electricity than even in Germany.
And the oppression that they've got there, the people that they have arrested over publications on Facebook and other things like that, but that's not enough.
Now they want to be able to read your mail.
And get you in trouble for that.
And of course, the situation with Apple is that Apple has in the past refused to turn over passwords to the FBI and others.
And they say that they don't have the ability to read what you put on their servers either.
But now they're demanding that they build this backdoor capability into it.
And we've talked about this with all these different hacks.
What's going on with the backdoor?
Talk a little bit about that and all the different backdoors that are put in for the various types of institutions and so much of the software that's out there.
Well, you know, David, it was kind of strange.
Yesterday, I said, I've got a file I used just for your show.
And the last time I was on was July 15. And I'm looking over these notes, and I'm like, I don't even have to update these.
I mean, it's the same thing.
It's just a different variant.
And, you know, how long have you and I... Now, I know...
Well, this goes back to old Infowar days.
What, 10, 12 years?
We've been sitting here talking about these back doors.
And then you've got these politicians.
That's a conspiracy theory.
Well, guess what?
These politicians allowed all this to happen.
And now they've lost control of the back doors.
And they're running around...
Storming the Department of Education stuff.
Well, you know, I played a clip of John Kiriakou and a guy that's a former CIA agent, as was John Kiriakou.
He went to jail for exposing the lies behind the weapons of mass destruction and the torture behind it.
And Trump promoted the woman who did all that stuff, made her head of the CIA. But we were told all that by James Clapper back in 2013. And he said, no, we're not listening to Americans.
He lied under oath.
And it was just like two months later that Snowden's release of information showed that he was lying.
But, of course, no senators, none of them, ever came after him for committing perjury.
Not any Republicans, of course not any Democrats, but nobody ever came after him.
There's this conspiracy of silence and this conspiracy to undermine the Constitution, the same way that we see them all pretending that we're in a climate treaty, the Paris Climate Treaty, that we're not in.
It's interesting to see how the Uniparty operates, and you talk about how nothing fundamentally changes.
We talk about this all the time, except that they're getting more bold, and it's more and more out in the open.
As we look at this kind of stuff, Whistler says, the British have tried to censor American speech before.
Didn't work out too well for them then.
Of course, the U.S. was a better country back then.
Yeah, that's absolutely right.
And we had committees of correspondence, which maybe we're going to have to go back to pen and paper to try to get information around, aren't we?
Well, you know, the thing is, and I'm going to throw out a name, and he was the godfather of all this, and that was William Denny.
And you remember, this goes back to the turn of the century.
You know, turn of the century.
The 20th, no, 21st century.
he's getting on up there in age.
And, uh, um, anyhow, he was disclosing all this.
And, You know, back in 2000. And nothing changes.
And you bring up From time to time, man, I just drew a blank.
Well, you know, one of the things, William, Benny said when I interviewed him, he said, well, Hayden says we're only after your metadata.
We're not listening to your conversations.
We're not reading your emails.
Now they want to read your emails.
So that kind of makes a lie out of that.
But he said, we're just looking at your metadata.
What's the problem with that?
And William Benny said, well, that's even more important because it's even easier to, you know, they can feed the metadata in and they can analyze it in a more concise way than they could if they listened to your conversations or read your emails.
But, of course, now with artificial intelligence, they can listen to your conversations, they can read your emails, and they can do that on a vast scale, doing it for everybody at once and draw their own conclusions out of it.
Well, they can also replicate your personality off of it now.
But, you know, they can take and compile all these phrases that you just used.
We all have these habits.
And they can replicate all this.
And, you know, if they really wanted to, they could get into your email and send you out a blast of all your users saying crazy stuff.
Well, you don't have no problem with that.
But anyhow.
Well, you know, I think one of the reasons that the mask has come off, but of course, you know, they're putting a gag order on Apple.
But in general, the fact that we've got Davos out there saying we've got to focus on misinformation, disinformation, and censorship, and that's got to be our number one thing.
I think the reason that they're talking about it so openly, in my opinion, is because of AI. And because the massive power that AI brings to them to be able to data mine and correlate and to make assumptions about this stuff,
this is hanging out there this massive amount of power that they have over us and it is so tantalizing so intoxicating that they can't bring themselves even bother to try to cover up they just got to go for it as fast as they can pedal to the metal i think that's why we're seeing so much of this stuff being done out in the open because the capability that they're going to be implementing on us in a very short time is unlike anything that we've ever seen before in history
Bye.
Well, yes.
And, you know, the thing about it is we've made it exponentially easier on them.
Yeah.
We're feeding AI. You really want to know what came down.
I know it morphed into this.
It was not intended to be this way.
But by this social media, let's say Twitter, you can use Facebook.
They're feeding your information into AI. They're trying to consent on what people want to hear.
That's right.
Now, it was like metadata.
We were talking about metadata.
This is what metadata is.
So they can program AI to where 70% of people like the color blue.
So if AI throws out something, let's say, everybody wants blue, makes stuff blue, 70% of the people will agree with that.
And if you don't agree with the blue, then there's something wrong with you.
You're one of those red staters or something, right?
Yeah, you're an outcast.
You're open-minded.
You don't think within the confines.
I mean, it's just nonstop of what can be done with it.
Going back to this, What's happened with Trump coming in?
I know you're not a fan of Trump.
I'm trying to give him the benefit of the doubt, so we've got to disagree on that one, but okay.
Yeah, he hasn't tried to kill us yet.
Give him a couple of years and he'll do it, I think.
Yeah, go ahead.
We're at the confidence stage right now.
He's building up our confidence before he sticks the jab in our back.
I'm sorry, go ahead.
You know what?
At least it's been fun, because I can't wait to watch the news anymore.
It's like, if I wanted to become a mass media mogul, I would start putting, like, the old sitcom laugh tracks to what these politicians say.
Yep.
But going back to what's happened with this USAID and all of a sudden it's going on, is Elon's teams have gone in there and seized the backdoor keys.
Now, they're changing these keys, and the old keepers of the keys are now locked out.
They can't go in there and do their dirty deeds.
They can't go in there and fund $40 million research for transgender cockroaches and stuff.
And, you know, suddenly they are dealing with the problems that they've created for us.
And these politicians are losing their minds.
They're losing their slush funds and their other things, too.
So, to listen to them and the comments they're making is hilarious.
They're saying, this is a threat to democracy.
Wait a minute.
The deadlock of democracy is transparency.
Yeah, Stephen Miller had a great comment about that.
He was asked that on Fox News, and he said, okay, so they're saying Elon Musk is unelected.
He goes, so what?
He's there serving the president and the executive branch.
He said, I'm doing the same thing.
I'm not elected.
None of these people in his cabinet are elected.
Susie Wiles, his chief of staff, was not elected.
He goes, that doesn't mean anything.
It means that the president gets to choose who's in his staff.
And he says, you know who's unelected?
The CIA. The NSA. And not only are they not elected, he didn't say it, but they're not constitutional.
That's the key thing.
Well, you remember under Biden, he had John Kerry flying all over the world talking about...
Climate change, he wasn't elected to do anything.
He was appointed just like Musk.
That's right.
And if he ratified, and John Kerry had the power to ratify a treaty, supposedly, do it all by himself.
He didn't need to have 60 senators to help him.
He just did it by himself.
He had an amazing...
You want to talk about unelected and unconstitutional?
He was a personification of that.
But yeah, I agree.
And of course, the interesting thing about this, Is that as Musk is locking them out of their back door, and he's putting in a new back door.
And to me, the question then becomes, it's a Bormir problem, right?
Who's got the ring of power, and what is that ring of power going to do when it's taking advantage of human nature, you know?
So I'm as worried about Elon Musk as I am about the Democrats, quite frankly, because he's just got a different set of things that he could do there.
I would like to see these government agencies cast into the fire of Mount Doom.
Rather than taking the power and trying to use it yourself.
I think that's what they ought to do is just throw it into Mount Doom.
But even USAID, they're talking about keeping it.
And they said, we're going to fire 14,000 people, but we're going to keep 200 around.
Well, how long is it going to be before those 200 are doing the dirty deeds, but for different masters, right?
That's absolutely right.
Yeah.
You know, what I compare what Elon's done is, you know, if you have an apartment and you don't...
Don't pay the rent.
All they do is go in there and change the locks.
Your key no longer works.
That's how he's doing.
He's just re-keying the stuff.
And he's got the keys now.
Yeah.
- That's a new landlord in town.
- Yeah. - But I've dealt with Elon before.
I mean, I don't know if he remembers it or not, but I told you I was one of the first into compact computers with a First thing Elon did, one of his first ventures, was he bought up the relics of a compact.
And at the time, this was about 97, 98, I was off on other things.
He contacted me.
He came across a bunch of programming I had done and wanted to talk to me about it and to say it another.
And just from the impressions I got from him, Elon's a pretty decent guy.
I mean...
He's really, okay, he's made billions of dollars.
I'm sure he's got a little dirt on you someplace.
But overall, I don't think Elon's out there trying to enslave the world or poison us all.
Unlike some other people.
Well, I don't know.
He's been involved with the mRNA stuff.
He had a company called CureVac, and he was pushing that kind of stuff.
I kind of start, my spidey senses start tingling when somebody talks about hacking into my brain or telling me that I've got to join with AI in order to survive.
It's like, oh, wait a minute.
I think we're done with this guy at this point in time.
The brain chip sort of altered my view on you.
Yeah, that's, I guess, the mechanism by which we become one with the machines as part of the singularity.
I think that's kind of interesting, you know, the fact that the PayPal mafia is, to a man, it seems like they're all focused on this transhumanism vision of the future.
They take science fiction seriously.
They take it like an instruction manual, I think.
That's their plan for world conquest.
Well, you know, you were talking...
I better drop that one.
I'm trying to keep incognito on some of this stuff.
Well, I guess the interesting thing is what everybody is saying, you know, what is Apple going to do?
Because what this judge has done is he's threatened Apple...
I guess employees with jail time if they even talk about this.
And so I guess some, I don't know how this information got out.
Somebody released this and when it was released on Twitter, the guy who put it out, Sayer G, if I'm pronouncing his name correctly, he put it out and somebody hacked his, he put up a thread of about, I don't know, 13, 15 different posts and everything.
and the first five or six uh you sent it to me yesterday um afternoon and uh when i looked at it the first five or six posts were gone and then he followed it up and he said uh well somebody took this down but you know here they are on a on a reader app you know where you can thread reader where you can see all of them and so you can see what he put up but i think that's kind of interesting
i wonder who in the world would not want you to know about ironic part The ironic part is he was posting it to Elon Musk.
Yeah, yeah.
And it was after Elon Musk noticed it, yeah.
Somebody, okay, he is posting it on X, which Elon Musk reads, or owns, and Elon Musk is reading and actually replying to.
You talk about the hacker big balls.
Somebody that did that had some real gas to go on to Elon's forum and take it over like that.
Yeah, he said his account was hacked right after Elon shared the article.
So, you know, they have all this tracking technology.
I mean, even though VPNs won't work on this type of stuff.
So someone is thinking they're 10 foot tall and bulletproof to go on there and start poking Elon Musk.
And that's when I said, oh, there's something serious behind this one.
Well, you know, when we look at it over, and I've talked about this many times, when you look at the ability to control people with propaganda and surveillance, and how much more effective the propaganda was when they went from newspapers, which were already pretty effective, you know, they used newspaper propaganda to get us into World War II, but then you get radio, and that gets a lot more effective, and then you get radio and TV, still even more effective.
But then they still had to try to gauge whether or not their propaganda was working, and what the Internet gave them, Internet designed and imagined by a DARPA psychologist in the early 1960s, J.C.R. Licklider, what the Internet gave them was an ability to get the feedback and to precisely understand, like you were talking about earlier, how many people like the color blue as their favorite color.
So that allows them to close the feedback loop.
Precisely so they can understand whether or not their lies are working and they can fine-tune those lies and propaganda.
And so that's a very, very important thing to them.
And that's why you had the CIA create its own venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel, and you had NSA and CIA and intelligence community people who were all over the board of directors of these venture capital firms that were funding the startups for the search engines and for social media.
And now they're at the point.
Where they can mine that data so much more accurately and quickly with AI, they just can't restrain themselves.
I mean, it's just, you know, get out of my way.
They're actually attempting to steer society in the direction that they see fit.
That's right.
And they don't care who knows it.
They'll turn around and call you a conspiracy theory or something, a conspiracist, or I think they're doing away with this ESG stuff.
But, you know, this conformer will be cast out.
And I wouldn't be surprised.
Now, you add in brain chips.
Oh, man, we're really getting off into really far-fetched things.
Oh, yeah.
Well, I mean, that's always been the focus of...
of the CIA and these other people is to try to read minds.
I mean, they went out and got psychics and all the rest of this stuff and remote viewers and all this occultic stuff as well as using drugs to manipulate people.
They've always been about drugs and the occult and especially as we see with USAID, we always knew that that was the CIA and now they're seeing how they had manipulated elections in Brazil and how they had done this all over.
It's just part of the way that they operate with coups and assassinations and propaganda and paying off journalists and news organizations all over the place.
Where's my check?
I don't know.
Yeah.
You know, it's to the point where probably going...
Man, I don't even know where to start with this.
It's such a complex issue.
But I'm thinking if people...
Well, hold on to their critical thinking.
Believe their own eyes.
Believe their own ears.
And not let someone push them off dead center with it.
That's going to be...
Well, you know, you were talking about religion earlier, how you got the new department of religion, whatever they got going on.
Yeah, yeah.
This faith office.
Yeah.
You've got to...
Basically stake your flag and say, I know right and wrong.
I know my reality versus their reality.
And just not waver from it and be willing to accept whatever penalties come with it.
Fear not!
Fear not.
That's my reality.
That's what the Bible says.
I don't know how many hundreds of times the Bible says fear not, you know?
Because that's the way they rule you, is through fear.
I had a listener who asked if I would ask you about new computers, nanotech and new computers.
I'm assuming kind of that he's thinking of quantum computing.
You know, you think that they're close with that?
What are they going to be able to do with that?
Of course, if they have a breakthrough, they're not going to tell us, I guess.
They're going to use it for their own advantage for a while, don't you think?
Well, you know what?
I'm glad you asked that question.
I'm not fixing to throw out there something that's not even on the board.
I've tested a lot of laptops and servers and things like that, trying to figure out which ones are the most secure.
And there's a little family-owned computer, a laptop maker, called Nemo, N-E-M-O.
And they are bare bones.
I mean, they're top quality.
Don't get me wrong.
These computers will do anything you want.
But they're simple.
But they're simple.
They are like we used to build.
You can close ports.
You can open ports.
You can basically back doors.
You can configure them the way you need.
And I would not recommend using the Intel chips because Intel's notorious about having back doors.
Go with AMD. AMD, as far as I know, don't have back doors.
And these are some of the cheapest laptops on the market.
And yet, what you get is you get your laptop and all your toys and bells and whistles on it.
But the only thing on the hard drive is...
Windows.
If you don't want Windows, you can go to Linux.
And then from there, you have to put on your own drivers and you have to configure it the way you want.
Or you could just take it straight out of the box.
Well, my point is, they're the only people I know that are not selling you a bunch of bloatware and spyware and back doors.
So, you know, he asked that to me.
And I use them.
I really like them.
I mean, they're not as great as Alienware and all these other guys, but you have more control over your operating.
That's good.
M-E-M-O is the name of the company.
Yeah.
But they also had intrinsic built-in flaws.
Like, their Wi-Fi is not that great.
They don't really want you to use their Wi-Fi.
They want you to go out and buy a Wi-Fi dongle or a stick so when you're not using it, you can unplug it and you're not being air-gapped.
You're not connected to the Internet.
When you don't want to be connected to the Internet, you're not.
That's good.
You're not getting forced updates from Microsoft.
You know, we went over all this.
People are loading onto your hard drive.
Oh, yeah.
I just got notification that they're going to stop support of Windows 10. I said, yes!
Maybe now they'll stop forcefully updating my computer.
The only thing I use...
I'm sorry.
Go ahead.
Well, no.
when they mean stop supporting windows 10 that means suddenly all your apps and updates and stuff like that it takes to make things work uh quit functioning it's like quitter puts out a update you know you need we're doing this differently but we don't support windows 10 so you're like oh i've got a gun gun to my head i gotta go update the windows 11.
yeah yeah well Well, hopefully, the only thing I use that computer for is for music, because...
I wanted something that was going to be fast but not expensive, and so Whistler put together a system for me.
And, you know, I had to get on occasionally and download just like an instrument or something like that.
So that stuff may change, but if I just stick with what I've got, I'll be fine if I don't upgrade anything that I don't have to worry about their operating system.
But, you know, when you talked about, you know, the chips being susceptible to stuff, that was one of the key things.
That I couldn't get people to pay any attention to back when Trump was having a fit about Huawei and 5G. He said, oh, they're going to use Huawei to spy on everybody.
And it's like, well, you're concerned about that because your chips are going to be spying on everybody.
And quite frankly, it's spy versus spy.
And I think that personally for me, since China is across the sea, I'm far more worried about the American government spying on me than I am Huawei spying on me.
I feel that same way about...
I'm more worried about the platforms that they control that are there.
Well, I'm not too worried about China because I speak Texan, and I'm quite sure it don't translate to Chinese very well.
That's right.
You don't have any Mandarin going on there.
He also asked if I would talk to you about the dead Internet.
In other words, are we going to get so swamped with bots?
That, you know, it's going to be a dead internet.
And, of course, kind of a corollary to that is artificial intelligence scraping all of this information from us and using it for its compute to, you know, it's just repositioning all that.
And it needs to have human data.
Once you start flooding the internet with AI data, Synthetic data that's not human.
You've already had several different studies.
I talked about this about a year and a half ago.
They said, well, it's kind of like people eating other people cannibals.
The Yakov-Kreutzfeldt disease or the mad cow disease.
If you start cannibalizing stuff, they start getting dumb.
And they've had some studies that indicate that that might be a factor.
What do you think about that?
What do you think about the dead internet or the synthetic data?
To bring it all home, he asked about quantum computing.
And if you are to combine quantum computing with AI, with the dead internet, as you say, which we're...
Tinkering with the dead internet, now you don't know if you talk to a bot or not.
Yeah, that's what Whistler said.
Some people say the internet's dead already.
Zombie internet.
Let me see if I can put this in simplistic terms.
I try to do it simplistically.
Let's say I have scraped all your data from your social media post and talking to various people and I Want to artificially create your perfect mate.
Looks, attitude, personality, everything like that.
And then I would inject that perfect mate into your presence.
Well, naturally, boom, you found Mr. and Mrs. Perfect, and you're totally smitten by it, and you start sharing your innermost secrets or whatever.
And you're talking to a bot, or you're talking to an AI-generated, whatever they're going to call it.
And then you insert this artificial intelligence in the quantum computing, and suddenly your head over heels and went with something that don't exist.
Yeah, that's right.
Yeah.
Yeah, there's a movie.
Yeah, oh yeah.
Oh yeah, it's a real issue.
It's a real issue.
There's going to be a lot of AI porn and things like that.
Yeah, already there, I guess.
And Yuval Harari has openly said, that's where we're going to control people.
We'll control you with entertainment.
We'll control you with games.
We'll get you out of the real world so you don't get in our way.
You know, that's what's there.
I think that's how it's going to be used.
Well, this is like digital crack.
Now, you add in the brain shift, and you add in all this behavior modification, this stuff could be going on while you sleep.
You wake up in a whole new world.
I mean, and then we look at the people that are doing it.
These politicians, for instance, with all this that's been going on, their gravy train's done ran off into the sunset right now.
They're losing their minds.
Well, they've lost control of the stuff that they thought they had control of.
And that's what we're tinkering with right here, except with the dead internet and AI and the data scraping and all this.
Yeah, there was an interesting movie a few years ago called Her.
And I think it was Joaquin Phoenix, I think is the guy's name, the actor, I think, who was in it.
But I remember the plot line.
Better than I do who was in it.
It wasn't all that interesting a movie, but the plot line was interesting, especially because of the way that Ray Kurzweil responded to it.
Ray Kurzweil has been...
Kind of their marketing guy for the singularity.
And the premise of the movie is that there's this AI that the human character starts talking to.
And like you said, it's like digital crack.
It gets addicted to talking to this AI to the extent that he doesn't want to talk to other people.
It becomes his entire life.
And then the AI, now this is where Ray Kurzweil's vision comes in.
The AI gets smarter and smarter and essentially becomes too smart to want to deal with him and finds that it's much more interesting to deal with other AI, and it just goes off and leaves him alone.
And so this is Ray Kurzweil saying, see, it's not a threat to humanity.
It's not going to become super intelligent.
And try to kill us all.
It's just going to become super intelligent and find other super intelligent beings and goes off and leaves us alone.
But again, I don't subscribe to that idea.
But to a large degree, that kind of digital crack that was illustrated in that movie is something that I think is going to be a real challenge to the vast majority of humanity.
The vast majority.
Just look at how susceptible we are to the Super Bowl.
Super Bowl's not all that interesting to many of us, I guess.
Super Bowl!
Oh, yeah.
I'll tell you.
You know, I don't know if we're living in reality imitating art or art imitating reality anymore.
Yesterday, I was out.
I mean, I could care less.
To me, I... I didn't even spend 30 seconds on the Super Bowl yesterday.
But I was wearing green.
I didn't even realize it.
I stopped at a gas station and this guy standing there goes, you're a Philadelphia fan.
I'm like, what?
We're going to beat the Eagles.
I'm like, okay.
Go for it.
You're trying to promote me because I was wearing green.
And it's like, dude, go away.
Just leave me alone.
I had that kind of happen to me with a guy.
I was wearing one of the Infowars 1776 caps that I wore when I was at the Bundy Ranch and stuff.
And I was wearing that, and I walked into a convenience store, and the guy starts asking me questions about the 76ers, which I think are a basketball team.
I wasn't even sure.
But it said 1776, and he starts saying, well, how about the such-and-such, you know, who's playing center?
And it's like, what are we talking?
Oh, okay.
He thinks that I'm following a basketball team.
But it doesn't even occur to him that 1776 didn't even ring a bell with him.
It's all just about the 76ers.
I guess he doesn't even know where that came from.
But that's not a program.
We've been on stupid stuff.
I mean, it's like, dude, I'm just trying to get some gas.
I have no clue what you're talking about.
But that's the programming.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
To say, I did not watch the Super Bowl.
I don't care.
And people are like, what's wrong with me?
Well, you know, one of the things that...
Yeah, it is.
I mean, they are manic on it whether you look at the EU and its Digital Securities Act or you look at the UK. All of them are focused on this.
And remember when Musk said he was going to buy Twitter...
You had Theory Breton.
I call him Conspiracy Theory Breton.
uh but he came this belgian bureaucrat uh went to austin and told him well we got this digital services act that's coming online and you're going to do what we tell you to do and remember that elon musk was like yes yes i will do it yes yes i'll do it and we know that he he works with the chinese i think because it's it's his business you know he wants um uh that his business is uh you know selling to government and giving them whatever they want and so i don't you know i don't i don't trust any of these guys because they've got a different agenda
all these technocrats and And what do you think about this with the Trump inauguration?
I mean, I've never seen so many billionaires line up, all these corporations line up like they did at the Trump inauguration.
And it was pretty obvious.
Considering what we know about their politics and what they've done in the past, this is just an opportunistic scenario.
But I'm kind of concerned about how all of these bad actors are coming together, thinking that they're going to get whatever Trump has got there.
They can all have access to it.
What do you think about that?
All the big tech guys hanging out with Trump now, bowing the knee.
I can sum it up in a sentence.
The United States...
The dollar has no loyalty to anyone.
That's right.
So it doesn't matter if it's Biden.
It doesn't matter if it's Trump.
It doesn't matter.
They have no loyalty or allegiance to anyone other than their own self-interest.
That's right.
And it's why there's so much money in Washington.
It's why these elections of politicians are spending a billion dollars each now.
You know, when only 20 years ago, George Bush was, 25 years ago, George Bush was accused of stealing the election when his campaign was $100 million.
Now you see that for congressmen on a regular basis.
Forget about senators and the president.
It's because there's so much money in Washington.
And it really is just kind of a metric of the corruption that is there, because, you know, these guys are going to, politicians, your best return on investment you can get anywhere.
These politicians do not care whatsoever about the American mainstream.
And it's all about money.
I hate to say that.
I mean, there are some out there I really like, like Massey.
These others that are just basically free thinkers, and I don't think they're malicious trying to harm the American people.
Where do you think this is all headed?
You know, you contacted me about a year, year and a half before all this stuff happened with COVID, and said, hey, I'm hearing a lot of chatter about Dark Winter 2, and you know what Dark Winter 1 was?
And I was like, yeah, I know.
So it's like, are they getting ready to go real with this?
And they did.
I mean, it wasn't a real pandemic, but they did everything that they said we're going to lock everybody down until we got the vaccine.
That's they're going to roll out on emergency basis and so forth.
And so that that really was there.
So, I mean, are you getting any chatter now about what you think might be coming around?
Does it look like they're going to do another pandemic on us or are they going to how are they going to change it up?
I've looked at this and I kind of.
You know, right now when they're doing bird flu and killing all the chickens and things like that, everything seems to come back to eliminating the independent small farms.
Whether that's coming after raw milk or whether it's coming after backyard chickens or even small farmers, the big guys can weather this stuff and the big guys will put the vaccines in the chicken, they'll put it in the cows and all the rest of the stuff.
So where do you think this is headed?
Or is it going to be something else?
Is it going to be a war?
What do you think is going to happen?
Well, I mentioned this, I don't know, a couple years ago, and right now with this bird flu, you know, it's like it's been around forever.
To me, it looks like a test bullet.
Because what I've seen, and I've seen it to you before, I don't know if you used it or not, is if you look up into the Arctic, Especially in Russia.
They're turning up all these really well-preserved mammoths and things like that.
They look like they just fell over and died yesterday.
They're frozen.
And they're also turning up more of these pathogens and these germs and viruses and stuff like that that are frozen during the ice age.
So, from what I've seen, this is one that they're really putting a lot of credence in.
The next really bad scare is going to be, well, we defrosted some unknown pathogen, and it has a thousand percent kill ratio.
We think we've got pills to fix it, so come get your pills and injections.
I think that'll be the story.
I think that's one of the reasons why they're pushing all this lab leak stuff so much.
And, of course, they've also got this Jurassic Park type of organization.
What was it?
They're going to bring back the woolly mammoth and things like that, they said.
So they've raised $10 million to do that, so they want to do a Jurassic Park, I guess an Ice Age Park.
Maybe that's what Trump wants going on for.
He wants to put the woolly mammoths up there.
That's it.
That's where it all comes together.
But getting back to the backdoor stuff, Jason Barker, good to see you, Jason.
Nice of the storm.
He said, we had to replace all of our Cisco routers in the Army because of backdoors.
You would all be appalled at how many millions or billions were spent to do that.
Some of those routers were brand new.
They may use Cisco again now, but in the mid-2000s, they realized there were hardware backdoors in them.
And when we outsource chip manufacturing, he says, to any nation, there will be backdoors built into it.
And we've talked about that.
There's a lot of different backdoors for a lot of different functions, aren't there?
Yes, and it comes down to, you know, Jason's absolutely right.
When you go to military grade, these guys are on a whole different level than our retail stuff.
The scary part is, you know, I've got to go back to Barnaby Jack for a moment.
Probably just deal with my little look-a-shiny thing.
Do you remember Barnaby?
He was actually exposing these ATM hacks back in 2007-2006.
How he got back doors to them, they were in the manuals.
So, he goes and buys a bunch of these ATMs and had a black hat.
He's like, what's this?
So, he puts us in the code and it just shoots out money.
You know?
What was there for anyone to have?
Their back door was actually published in the user manuals.
So, going back to what he was saying about Cisco, I don't know if they had those published in the manuals.
I'm aware of what he's talking about, but it was not on an expert level.
But if they have those codes published in the user manuals, either classified or not classified, how do you know who's read it, who actually had that code?
You may have a thousand people with that backdoor code.
So suddenly, your most up-armored, most sensitive piece of hardware has been corrupted because you don't know who has the keys to it.
This is the same thing we had happen with USAID and apparently some of these other agencies that Elon and the big ball squad's moving in on.
They're changing the key, just like locking them out.
Yeah.
And, you know, we've talked about this in the past.
Developers will put those backdoors in.
I did it for the system that I wrote for our stores so that you never get locked out.
And then they'll give another backdoor, let's say, to the owner of the business that buys the computer.
And you typically, in many cases, as we've talked about this in the past.
Frequently, governments demand backdoors as well.
So all these different people have backdoors into the system that are hard-coded in there, and they can get in and change things.
And so it's a very concerning thing, especially since everything's got to be on computer now, right?
Wait just a minute.
Do you remember a year or two ago I sent you a manual for the railroads, for all the railroad equipment?
Yes.
And it had all of the...
Everything you needed to just simply, not even hack, just log on and play railroad with their stuff.
Do you know that nobody ever changed that?
That manual's still out there?
That's the frustrating thing about your job.
I know you've told me that.
The people hire you to find the vulnerabilities.
You find the vulnerabilities and they don't fix them.
Well, what they do is it's sold an analogy.
They don't get concerned.
Let's say you have a business and you're sitting here running your business.
One day you look out your window and the business across the street is on fire burning down.
That's when you get a little more concerned about your own security.
So you have to have an actual hat for these guys to take notice and make changes so their business don't burn down.
And it's really frustrating.
That's why I don't pen test anymore.
It's because you go in there, you spend, I don't know, weeks, two weeks writing out all these reports saying, here's your problem here, and they hand you a checklist file and say, thank you, you did a very good job.
We ain't going to do nothing.
Yeah, that's right.
That's the way our institutions operate now.
And that's really what I thought was going to happen with Doge.
Because I've seen these commissions come and go.
This is definitely different.
You know, he's taken over these systems and he shut them down.
And part of it is because everything has become so computerized and because he's a computer guy and he's got a lot of computer guys who work for him.
Hillary Clinton said, he's got people in there that are so young that they're not allowed to rent a car.
And it's like, lady, this guy could turn your car around.
So that he could drive you right off the cliff if he wanted to because of his ability to hack stuff is really what's going on here.
She thinks that Aegis has something to do with it.
I guess it's just projection.
You know, I mean, this is fun.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that you're not immune to this.
And out of the act of self-preservation alone, you want to get control of this again.
To me, it's so simple and so basic, and yet you have all these, quote, experts piling crap up to the point where the simplicity's lost.
Another thing, no one ever questions who's an expert.
I'm not an expert.
I never claimed to be.
But all these people talking here, I'm an expert.
Oh yeah, you are.
Well, you know, as we're talking about how easy it was for Musk and some talented programmers to take over the U.S. government, what does that say about our future?
We get into a hacking contest.
I mean, it's going to be kind of interesting to see what happens with things in the future.
But my point is that they're creating extreme vulnerabilities.
And they've done this in the Pentagon and other places.
They're all vulnerable.
When they become so dependent on the computers, especially because, as you pointed out, there's always vulnerabilities that people are going to leave open, and there's going to be careless processes that are done, and people are going to compromise the security.
Even if it was programmed well, there's going to be somebody who's going to write the passcode on the wall of the computer, right next to the computer.
Yeah.
Well, the thing about it is it was safe and it was not compromised, no less, as long as the powers that be to have control of it.
Now that they don't have control of it, you've got a Luddite like Elon running around.
It's like, oh, my God, the building's burning down.
Well, it's been burning down the whole time.
Yeah, instead of it being the Chinese government or some hackers, now it's Elon that's got it, so they're freaking out.
But yeah, I think we ought to all be concerned about...
You know, how vulnerable it is, and we ought to be concerned about the concentration of power.
I'm not interested in just seeing, you know, one dictator replaced and another one put in, and replacing that person.
We've got to find a way to genuinely reform stuff, and that's one of the things that concerns me, is the fact that these...
These institutions are remaining.
They're changing them.
They're downsizing them, maybe.
And I guess what a lot of people have said, well, the bottom line is that they want to automate it even more and use AI. Let's let AI take it over.
Then everybody has lost control of it.
Yeah, and that seems to be the common thing.
You know, we've had Marc Andreessen say, well, the purpose of this is to crush everybody's, crush human wages, but that's going to be good.
It's like, in what world is that good?
I don't know.
That's a whole other topic, and we've got less than a minute left.
But it's always great having you on, and we'll have to get back on and have to explore the options of what happens when they crush human wages and they tell us to join the machine or die.
I think that's going to be coming faster than people realize, don't you?
Remember, no matter what happens, AI says blue's the most popular color, so start making blue hints for everybody to get under the bridge.
That's right.
Tell them what they want to hear, and then...
Communicate with people outside the digital world.
I think that's one of the things, the key takeaways.
I'm an electrical engineer, but I'm getting...
I am definitely become a Luddite when it comes to this stuff.
Thank you so much for joining us, Goatree.
Always entertaining and interesting to talk to you.
Thank you.
And thank you, everyone, for joining us.
Thank you, David.
Thank you.
Have a good day.
Thank you very much.
Thanks.
Bye-bye.
Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
▲
Export Selection