All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 14, 2025 - The David Knight Show
03:00:43
Tue Episode # 1,931: Tulsi PsyOp, JD vs J6ers, Cancer Cure, Toothpaste Lawsuits, and AI DeFi & Tokenization
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
In
a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's the David Knight Show.
It's Tuesday, the 14th of January, year of our Lord 2025.
Today we're going to take a look because we're less than one week away from Trump's day one What is he going to do on day one?
Well, this week we've got 13 cabinet confirmations coming up.
Tulsi Gabbard has already done a la-la hilarious flip-flop.
A complete betrayal of what she has said she stood for for the last several years.
But it's not just a betrayal by her.
It's also a betrayal by Donald Trump, who will not replace her because, you know, this is about winning.
And then we'll take a look at the J6ers.
Will they be pardoned?
We have one person who has spoken out about what J.D. Vance had to say, very angry about hints that they might walk away again.
Will there be peace in Ukraine, or will there be an escalation of war, will there be peace at home?
Or do we have these CIA shows like Sarah Adams preparing us for terrorism at home, as well as war abroad with Iran?
And then of course what is going to happen with the economy, we'll take a look at that.
Terrace cracks the economy?
Will he burst the crypto bubble?
And they're also going to take a look at cancer that's gotten a lot of attention after Mel Gibson went on with Joe Rogan, but there's better remedies than what they're talking about.
We'll be right back.
Let's begin with politics.
We've got House Republicans say that they are weighing $5.7 trillion in spending cuts to fund Trump's domestic agenda.
Wait a minute.
We're just going to move this around, or are we actually going to save $6 trillion?
I mean, he could add that in one year, but they're not even talking about getting rid of this at all.
They're talking about switching it from one agenda to another.
They talk a little bit about what they want to cut.
They don't want to say that much about what they're going to spend it on, except increased border security.
They're going to turn America into an open-air prison, folks.
But more importantly, this reduction that we talk about so much.
Doge says, oh, we're going to get rid of $2 trillion.
Well, this $5.7 trillion in spending cuts, that would be over 10 years.
Do you take any of this stuff seriously?
When you hear Congress talking about a 10-year cut, that's even more ludicrous than a communist five-year plan.
Communists are always making their five-year plans.
And Congress is always making its 10-year cuts.
They will not be there, probably, in 10 years, but who knows?
They do have tenure.
Over the next decade, $5.7 trillion, they say, Trump's ambitious priorities, including tax cuts and increased border security.
You know, we talk about tax cuts.
Oh, this is, notice the way this is couched, even by Zero Hedge.
His domestic agenda, okay.
It's going to be spending cuts and things like that.
Tax cuts, all these people become budget hawks when they start talking about tax cuts.
Money for Ukraine?
I don't care.
Money for the people in Western North Carolina?
Well, I don't know.
We'll see.
We can't do anything about that right now, says Mike Johnson, GOP Speaker of the House.
We can't do anything about that right now.
It'll be a couple of months before we can get around to that.
They still haven't done anything to fix...
Interstate 40 got wiped out.
And they're talking about it.
Maybe someday doing something about it.
How long does it take to do that?
They don't care.
And when it comes to tax cuts, these people really dig in their heels.
And why is that?
Why is that?
You know, Trump just said he wanted to get rid of the debt ceiling for two years.
The Democrats have been saying all along, when they did the Inflation Reduction Act, Right?
That was a massive spending bill.
They're not going to reduce inflation.
They're not going to reduce spending.
The Democrats believe in MMT, modern monetary theory.
I call it the magic money tree.
The deficits don't matter.
We can just spend as much as we wish.
Doesn't matter at all.
And of course, Trump agrees with him.
Let's just raise the deficit.
He spent his businesses into oblivion.
He bankrupted six casinos.
Give me a break.
What do you expect this guy to do?
And yet, with all of that disregard for the debt, all that disregard for the deficits, they've got to have their income tax.
Why is that?
The income tax isn't even what pays for the government.
It's less than half of the government's revenue.
And yet they've got to have it.
Because it's about taking from us.
It's about keeping us powerless.
And that's what the green agenda is really about.
Now, in this, they float the idea that they're going to take some money from the green boondoggles that are out there, but then they immediately pour cold water on that, saying, no, there's like, you know, nearly 20 Republicans who aren't going to go along with that.
Because this money is coming into their district.
And they don't really care about what happens to the deficit.
It's just, how much money can I get?
They're all there at the feeding trough.
Republicans as well as Democrats.
The menu includes slashing welfare programs, revising the Affordable Care Act subsidies, and rolling back green energy tax credits.
And then the rest of the article is how this isn't really going to happen.
They could end welfare for foreigners.
Before we give them the vote, they wouldn't be offending any constituents, would they?
But they're not going to do that.
Welfare magnet?
Nobody's talking about doing anything about the welfare magnet.
The overall savings add up to as much as $5.7 trillion over 10 years.
Highly ambitious and as close to the truth as a jobs report from the Biden administration.
All this stuff is cooked.
The information they give you about inflation rate?
That's a lie.
The jobs numbers, that's a lie.
Cutting $5.7 trillion in 10 years, that's a big lie.
That's a really big lie.
They say it's unlikely to become law, says Politico.
Yeah, that's right.
One GOP lawmaker, a senior GOP lawmaker, said, well, all these supposed cuts feel pretty controversial.
I'm telling you, there's not going to be any cuts.
They'll cut some things like subsidies to Musk's competitors.
Now that he has maxed out his EV credits, he doesn't want his competitors to have them.
That kind of stuff will go through.
They can do that in the name, they can do that crony capitalism in the name of fiscal conservatism.
So it'll go through.
One of the most contentious components of the plan, however, is targeting Medicaid.
The list suggests imposing work requirements for Medicaid recipients.
A move that was projected to save $690 billion.
We don't want anybody working that's on welfare, do we?
I mean, you know, to give them more welfare.
Anyway, the Affordable Care Act, another significant topic.
Republicans are eyeing $46 billion in savings.
How much was it that we sent to Ukraine again?
Uh-huh.
Perhaps the most politically delicate area involves green energy and climate initiatives.
The proposal identifies up to 468 billion.
Nearly half a trillion right there.
And green garbage.
And watermelon projects.
Thin veneer green on the outside and completely red Marxist on the inside.
$468 billion in savings by repealing provisions from Biden's climate policies.
The very first one they mention is that subsidy for Elon Musk's competitors now that he has maxed out his available subsidy.
Yet not all Republicans are aligned on this front.
18 House Republicans, many of them representing districts that are benefiting from clean energy projects.
No, clean energy projects can be anything.
It needs to work.
You can clean up a coal plant.
Coal is not dirty.
They just want to make it seem like that.
So, 18 House Republicans have warned Speaker Johnson against prematurely dismantling green energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act.
They like that.
What does it mean prematurely?
How long are these things supposed to go?
Well, you know, if we leave them there.
Then what happens is it sets a precedent.
You know, they kind of harden in place.
Think of these projects as cement that is drying around your feet.
Even proposed cuts to green energy tax credits worth as much as $500 billion could be tricky.
They depend on political viability, and the 18 House Republicans are warning about prematurely repealing these things.
Let's not do that.
That'd be premature.
This is why we have the Paris Climate Accord.
This is why these people pretend that we're in a treaty that we're not in.
It's just a grift, folks.
What a crew of liars and conmen and con artists.
It's amazing.
And speaking of that, at the top of the list is Tulsi Gabbard, who now supports warrantless search of people.
The FISA 702. She has opposed this.
All of her term as a congresswoman.
She offered a bill to stop it.
Folks, if we go back to the 1970s, I'll just remind you again.
The CIA hearings were not fundamentally about heart attack guns and CIA assassinations and coups.
The reason that came about was because by the 1970s, they realized that after their creation, The CIA, let's say 25, 30 years earlier, the CIA had immediately, and NSA as soon as they were created, they had immediately started surveilling American citizens.
And that's why what came out of the church committee hearings, and in the House of Representatives, the Pike committee hearings, both of them were having hearings at the same time.
What came out of that wasn't any prohibition against Coups and assassinations, unfortunately.
What came out of that was a prohibition against them snooping and spying on us without a search warrant.
And that was what FISA was about.
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
You can surveil foreigners in foreign countries without a search warrant.
But you can't legally surveil Americans in a foreign country without a search warrant.
And you can't legally surveil foreigners in America without a search warrant.
But they got ways to get around it.
The first thing they did was they put in this FISA-702 to start to give them legal cover.
But for anything that seems to be a gray area, they have their five I's collaboration.
We have the five English-speaking countries and their intelligence agencies.
You know, they spell the five I's as E-Y-E-S. Maybe it should be the five capital letter I. The five intelligence agencies of the U.S., U.K., Canada, New Zealand, Australia.
And what they do is, if they're not allowed to spy on somebody legally in their own country, they ask one of their buddies, hey, would you do that for us?
And then they give them the information.
Or they ask a large corporation, like AT&T, or like Facebook, or like Twitter, would you spy on them for us, please?
And, you know, if you get that information, you know, you don't have any prohibitions against looking at people.
And if you get that information because they're your customer, you can voluntarily turn that over to us and everything's good.
So they can partner with corporations.
They can partner with foreign intelligence agencies to get this stuff.
But they like the Pfizer-702.
And now Telsie Gover does because she likes the idea that she's going to get power.
And just remember where she came from.
And I've talked about this many times.
I've shown you all of these things about Tulsi Gabbard in the past.
She has made a point of being in the Illuminati.
There she is, doing her little Illuminati thing.
She has, during COVID, put on a face shield and a paper mask.
I am sadly getting a lot of compliments on my face shield.
Thanks, Corona.
Yeah, see?
It was all Corona that did it to everybody.
It wasn't Trump.
And why would she do something like that?
Well, because her military service in the Army, and she's a lieutenant colonel, is in PSYOPs.
She works in PSYOPs campaign.
What'd you think?
What'd you think she was?
She works in PSYOPs.
And then, of course, you know, we also know that she works...
With the World Economic Forum people.
There she is.
Her picture there.
The young global leader.
Right between Alex Soros.
George Soros' son.
And Dan Crenshaw.
And right above Mark Zuckerberg.
Megan Rapinoe.
The rabble-rousing lesbian soccer player.
And it's just...
It's really pretty amazing.
The people are surprised that she would betray them.
I said that when she was picked.
I said, let's take a look at her standing in front of Congress and doing the Illuminati triangle thing with her hands.
What was that about?
Is that for your masters?
What were you doing?
Trump doesn't know that, though, right?
No, he doesn't know.
Is he going to get rid of her now?
Now that she says that she likes FISA 702?
Apparently, the FISA process and the 702 aspect Which is specific to American citizens, you can spy on them without a search warrant.
It's the line in the sand that the Senate Select Intelligence Committee has drawn.
So think about that.
That's even worse.
This is a committee of Republican senators, and they made that the condition.
You know when they would bring in Supreme Court justices, and remember the litmus test of Roe v.
Wade?
Well, this is their litmus test.
We spy on American citizens.
Think about that.
For years, we had confirmation hearings of our Supreme Court justices.
For over half a century.
And the litmus test was, will you support the killing of innocent babies?
Now the litmus test is, will you spy on American citizens and kill the Bill of Rights?
That's what we have in Washington.
It's a bipartisan thing.
And power, she wants it.
She wants that power.
Give me that ring of power.
I'll do anything you say.
Just like Trump.
She's reportedly reversed her position, and now she supports it.
It should be remembered, in the latest reauthorization of FISA-702, Congress exempted themselves from warrantless search and surveillance systems, but not you.
And that's what really changed about it.
Now, her story is that now that they've had the reforms, she can support it.
Now that they don't spy on Congress, she can support it.
What?
That's even worse.
That's even worse, that they would exempt themselves.
So, Congress forbids the FBI, CIA, any U.S. intelligence apparatus, or any entity with access to the NSA database.
Congress prohibits them being allowed to use...
To search them, or their staff, or their staff.
This is like the insider trading thing, right?
When I get into Congress, you know, I can do insider trading, and so can my staff.
I know, Pelosi, they took, CBS made an issue of it, especially pointing to Pelosi.
They called it the Pelosi Act as a nickname, but she put out what was called the Stock Act.
It was an acronym.
I don't remember what it was.
But that lasted all of about four or five months before they amended it so much that they eviscerated it.
That was going to prohibit members of Congress or their staff from doing insider trading, and it just lasted as long as the media attention was on them.
And then when the media attention went somewhere else, they completely eviscerated that.
And so what they have done is they have completely exempted themselves.
From insider trading, they've exempted themselves from being looked at by the FBI or the NSA or any of these intelligence agencies.
Let me tell you something.
The people who need to be looked at the most closely are these people because they have the most power and because we've seen over and over again how corrupt they are and how corrupted they are by that power and that money.
They are the ones who should be scrutinized the most and yet they have exempted themselves proving that they are a threat, proving that they are criminals.
What have you got to hide?
Remember that?
When the CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt, said, well, you shouldn't be worried about people smiling.
You know, she's got something to hide.
So what's Congress got to hide?
A lot more than you or I. After spending years asking every representative of consequence why they support the FISA 702 process, this article is by Sundance, the conservative treehouse.
He says, I can tell you every one of them.
Says that they believe it is needed because the intelligence community tells them that there are just too many domestic terror threats that need to be monitored.
Well, I think the Congress is the biggest terrorist threat to Americans, and I mean that.
Quite literally.
Look at the definition of terrorism.
It is the use of force or the threat of violence to achieve political goals.
Doesn't that define everything that our government does?
Everything is done under threat of violence to achieve their political goals.
It is impossible to find a person, he says, in D.C. who will forcefully try to stop FISA-702 reauthorization.
If you ask me why, in hindsight, I now take the position that FISA-702 is the gateway.
The gateway.
To the massive surveillance system currently being put into place using Real ID, AI facial recognition software provided by Palantir.
This is the money that they scrape, if they do scrape any money from any of the programs, is going to be put into domestic surveillance.
That's what's going to happen in the Trump administration.
In essence, the gateway that allows full-scale surveillance state that will be ushered in by Donald Trump.
And we'll all just trust him, right?
Because he's all about America first.
What are you, crazy?
Donald Trump, an enemy of the people?
It's opened by the prior authorization of FISA-702 that negates any Fourth Amendment protections whatsoever.
Because, you know, fortunately, Trump can do whatever he wishes.
Second Amendment, that's not a prohibition.
And, of course, Biden can do whatever he wishes as well.
They all believe that.
These congressional and executive office terrorists.
James Lankford, a Republican senator from Oklahoma, member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, suggested on a Wall Street Journal podcast Wednesday, last Wednesday, that Gabbard should disavow her previous opposition to the 702 program.
Then the Senate Intelligence Committee chair.
So he's just a member.
Lankford is a member.
The chair of the committee is Tom Cotton, Republican, Arkansas, also sent out a statement the next night, Thursday night.
He supported her 702 stance, but he said, Tulsi Gabbard has assured me in our conversations that she supports 702, as recently amended, you know, to exclude Congress, and that she will follow the law and will support its reauthorization.
As DNI. No, follow the law means you follow the Constitution.
It means you follow the Fourth Amendment.
This is also a big part of the reason why the D.C. deep state, he says, will easily confirm Kash Patel to be Trump's FBI director.
Kash Patel is a big believer in the value of FISA-702 as well.
These heroes.
How do they get to be heroes?
Well, that's people like Alex Jones and Breitbart and other people talking about what heroes they are.
They're the ones who sold you these backstabbing traitors who want to betray you and the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
So, you now support Section 702 that gives the U.S. government the power to surveil Americans warrantlessly.
She says, if confirmed as DNI, I'll uphold Americans' Fourth Amendment rights while maintaining vital national security tools like Section 702. Okay, liar.
This is like somebody getting up who, let's say you've got somebody who has spent, I don't know, last five or six years working for a pro-life organization and opposing abortion.
And then, when offered a high-paying job as CEO of Planned Parenthood, They tell you, well, I'm going to be pro-life even though I'm going to be the CEO of Planned Parenthood.
You buy that?
She made that Faustian bargain a while ago, quite frankly, even about abortion.
She was pro-life.
And then in order to get elected in Democrat Hawaii, she threw the babies under the bus.
Now she's throwing the Constitution and you under the bus.
And so is Trump who picked her, who stands by her, who will push for her confirmation.
During her time as a member of the House of Representatives, she branded herself as a stalwart opponent of mass surveillance, writes the Libertarian Institute.
In 2020, she introduced a bill that would have repealed 702. Well, just four years ago, five years ago now.
Gabbard says she is now convinced.
The reforms to the FISA Act implemented by Congress have alleviated her concern over civil liberties because now we protect the privacy of members of Congress.
Isn't that nice?
But only them.
Only them.
You know, so this is perfectly plausible, right?
Isn't it?
Because, you know, we know that Donald Trump was anti-globalist.
And they continue to tell you that he was anti-globalist even as he took the lead in the global lockdown.
Took the lead in all of it.
And took the lead in the global vaccine to depopulate people.
But he's still, he's anti-globalist.
He's anti-world economic form.
He's all this other stuff.
No.
No.
Judge them by what they say.
By what they do, not by what they say.
Anybody can say anything.
Take a look at what they do.
Gabbard thinks that now it's all been fixed, right?
Nothing has been changed.
Except for Congress.
It's unclear what reforms Gabbard is referring to in FISA, says the Libertarian Institute, since it was previously used to target the 2016 Trump campaign.
At one point, Trump was a staunch opponent of repealing Section 702, and he posted on social media, kill FISA. Well, no, actually what they need to do is enforce FISA. See, Section 702. Killed FISA already.
He doesn't even know how to communicate it.
FISA was there to stop them from doing this.
The 702 amendment was to let them get around FISA. What he meant was kill 702. Anyway.
But that was before.
That was before he got the ring of power.
Now Boromir is going to take office in six days.
So, Republican Senator James Lankford questioned Gabby's reversal.
After meeting with her, he said she voted against what's called 702 Authority every time that she was in Congress and voted against it.
Well, now she's going to be a spokesman for 702 Authority.
That's a legitimate question to ask.
How are you going to handle this?
And what does that mean?
Yeah, what does it mean?
See, he doesn't trust that she's going to be on her side.
I don't trust that this Lieutenant Colonel of PSYOPs...
Is going to do anything except betray us in the Constitution.
But now she's going to be, notice, she's going to be a spokesman for it.
After opposing it for years, she's now going to be a surveillance evangelist.
She's going to be telling everybody what we've got to have.
And then we move to J.D. Vance.
And he had the, I didn't talk about it yesterday except briefly, I mentioned it, referenced it.
I want to play you the clip.
He went on Sunday, and he said, well, obviously, any pardons for J6ers, it should obviously not be anybody who was engaged in violence.
And I said that, too.
But do you think that they really had a fair trial?
Number one.
Number two, what about excessive punishment, right?
If somebody got violent there, is it like life in prison?
Is that reasonable?
Isn't excessive punishment and a prejudice system of justice there in Washington, D.C.? Isn't that enough for you?
And then, of course, that all ignores the issue of agent provocateurs and who got violent first.
I just asked J.D. Vance.
People who come up with shields and armor, and they start shooting you, and they start beating you, are you supposed to just lay down at their feet?
Is that what you're supposed to do?
You're not supposed to defend yourself or other people.
Is that right?
Is that right?
I don't like war, folks, and you know that.
But I'm not a pacifist when it comes to self-defense and defense of others.
In an aggressive situation.
When you look at the pardons that Biden has done and is talking about doing, did anybody there on January 6th, and I mean anybody, anybody, I haven't seen anybody, any pictures of anybody, even the people who are violent, that did anything worse than Joe Biden and especially his son Hunter, right?
And yet, Joe Biden pardoned them.
Joe Biden pardoned 1,500 people.
Joe Biden pardoned people who have been convicted of murder and other capital crimes and were on death row.
But J.D. Vance is going to throw under the bus people who were there on January the 6th to support Trump because they naively believed that was the thing that they could do.
And then get caught in a melee?
Again, Biden has gotten rid of all the people on death row, federal death row, except for two or three.
And yet, J.D. Vance just can't bring himself to have the guts to pardon people.
people that's why i said when people got very upset about hunter when people got upset about these other pardons i said don't scream about it too much because it puts pressure on trump to do what trump is not inclined to do which is the right thing - So, yeah, those who protested peacefully on January 6th should receive a pardon.
If you peacefully protest, that's specifically protected on the First Amendment, but we're post-constitutional America.
Fourth Amendment doesn't apply.
First Amendment doesn't apply.
If you've got somebody...
Joe Biden really should do some preemptive pardons if he wants to protect his friends, because his friends were the ones who broke the law when they violated the First Amendment and locked people up for exercising their First Amendment rights.
People who were there, and I'll just, if you're even at the Capitol, and you are protesting peacefully at the Capitol, let's just leave it the peaceful stuff right now.
If you're peacefully protesting and redressing your grievances, as the First Amendment says.
And somebody locks you up?
They're the criminal.
That would be like them going to somebody who is engaging in their religious freedom and locking them up.
Oh, that's right.
I guess the difference between lock up and lock down, I get confused between Trump and Biden, right?
Yeah.
After everything that Trump did, I'll just say this again.
I still don't understand.
The mindset of people on January the 6th.
There was nothing that could be done.
And there was nothing, in my opinion, that should be done.
Trump deserved to be thrown out.
Not to Biden.
I wouldn't see Biden in there either.
But Trump, after the betrayal of what he had done starting in March, the lockdowns, the vaccines, the rest of the stuff, the face masks, the medals for Fauci and all the rest of this.
And you're going to not protest any of that in Washington?
But you're going to protest when he gets thrown out?
Why'd he get thrown out?
Well, because he played the game.
Of lockdown because he played the game of, well, it's all vote by mail.
And we knew what that was going to be.
And quite frankly, I believe the whole thing was a plan.
I think the real plan, the real sting, was to make sure that they handed it over to Biden and then handed it back to Trump.
I think the whole thing was planned from the beginning.
He said, if you protest the peaceful on January 6th and you've got Merrick Garland's Department of Justice treating you like a gang member, you should be pardoned.
If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn't be pardoned.
And then he later came back after he got a lot of pushback about that.
And he said, well, President saying that he'll look at each and every one of these cases and me saying the same is not some walk back.
I assure you, we care about the people who have been unjustly locked up.
Do you really?
Do you really?
Yes, that includes people provoked.
And it includes people who got a garbage trial.
Well, I hope that's true.
It's hard to tell.
You know, again, we'll have to wait and see six days from now.
They're very concerned about Hamas hostages.
And I'm not saying that we shouldn't be concerned about that.
But it's not about America first.
We don't come first in this.
Not even his supporters.
So, again, continuing violence by Netanyahu will not disqualify him from getting tens of billions of dollars, right?
But if you get into a melee with the police, depending on who started it, now you go to jail for life.
But Netanyahu will keep giving him tens of billions of dollars as he continues to kill scores of children every day in Gaza.
That comment came in response to a prominent conservative social media accounts statement.
By the way, this is the Hodge twins.
I don't know who they are.
But they put this up, and let's see, where is it?
This is the J6 thing.
I wonder if we would not have that in there.
We don't have that in there.
Let's see.
I'm going to just wait here a second, because I wanted you to see this.
Here it is.
Here it is.
The J6, the cops, shoot first.
People not violent, but up down the top, you see some cops, and you'll see them start to shoot into the crowd, and you'll hear them shooting.
The criminals are!
They're inside the house!
It is your due!
Well, I certainly agree with that.
That's what the criminals are.
They're inside the house.
And this is what one J6er said.
This is Luke Lentz, I think.
He served four months in jail.
He got 32 months of probation after that, but it has turned his life upside down.
His bank accounts, his job aspects, all the rest of this stuff.
And he had this to say.
I don't know about you, but...
The last four years have been absolute hell for me.
I've been hunted down.
I've dealt with PTSD from January 6th.
I was where the worst of the violence was that day.
I saved people's lives while I was there from the Capitol Police.
I grabbed a riot shield and then used it to defend other people's lives.
And then you get people grifting on the movement.
Okay, alright, you know.
Everybody's got to make their buck, I guess, off me.
And then you get people like J.D. Vance.
He wasn't there.
He doesn't know what happened.
President Trump telling people to be non-violent.
I'm going to say this once, okay?
You expect us to believe that they stole the election, okay?
Which is against the law.
And then you...
Want us to peacefully and patriotically go there.
Okay, so we did.
and then we get attacked by these stupid motherfuckers and now you're not willing to stand with us Thanks.
After we went through four years of hell?
Hell!
We were locked up.
Our f***ing bank accounts were drained.
Life ended.
The world stood still for us.
I want to make sure the innocent men and women who were locked up for doing nothing wrong get a pardon.
That's what I want.
Now I might look like a fool right now, but I have dealt with four years of being called a fucking insurrectionist.
Four years.
Thank you.
I want my freedom back.
I don't want people to look at me like this anymore.
And I want the good men to be free.
I don't want the good men to be free.
And the good women.
I don't deserve this.
We should be a hundred percent assured.
Instead, you mother are still playing politics.
Yeah, well, they were playing politics with people's lives all along.
January the 6th was the very worst cause you could have.
The very worst place you could fight for that cause.
And they were led there by Trump and by Alex Jones.
He said, yeah, everybody's got to make their buck grifting off me.
I get it.
He says.
Finally, he gets it.
And that's what it was.
And I wasn't going to be quiet about this stuff.
I opposed it from the very beginning.
When I called it a grift, I got fired.
When I called it a grift on air.
But I opposed it.
I told Alex Jones, do not come on my show pushing this stuff.
I'm not going to be a part of this lie.
And then it got really bad.
And I told people up to that very day, do not go.
It is a trap.
It was a trap laid for them by Trump, by Stop the Steal and Alex Jones and the rest of this stuff.
And then Trump had two weeks.
Two weeks to pardon these people.
And he didn't do it.
Why?
Because he was worried about himself.
As I've said before, we've had people who have been pardoned preemptively.
The insurrection law itself, Andrew Johnson, pardoned everybody preemptively.
Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon preemptively.
Now we've got Joe Biden doing it preemptively for a lot of people.
But not that traitor Trump, that backstabbing traitor Donald Trump, will not do that for his own people.
He uses them.
He plays politics with their lives.
Some people will never learn.
I'm just hoping this isn't the kind of regret that each and every American is going to have in this coming Trump administration that starts in six days.
You know, when you look at this, like I said, Biden has pardoned 1,500 people.
He's pardoned people who committed crimes worthy of death.
Got them off of death row.
And they're going to play this number?
Well, maybe it's just that J.D. Vance, as articulate as he sounds, doesn't really know what he believes.
And so, he was also on one of these talk shows.
Well, they talked to him about the economy.
And he wasn't sure what to believe there, either.
Talk about what he's left on the border.
He wants to talk about what he's left to do on the economy.
There was a robust report out of December on jobs.
Unemployment down to 4.1%.
President Biden says his policy decisions are finally paying off.
Here's a bit more he said on Friday.
Sure.
After decades of trickle-down economics...
Don't pee on me and tell me it's raining.
It's growing the economy from the middle and the bottom up that benefits everyone.
The new playbook is working.
Okay, so the December numbers were good.
What kind of credit do you give him?
Well, look, first of all, I wish Joe Biden all the best, but the fact is he has left us a dumpster fire, not just at the border, but also with the economy.
First of all, we know that prices are way too high for many Americans.
We have to work every single day to stabilize prices for American families.
But Shannon, everything that he's bragging about ignores the fact that he has added trillions and trillions of dollars to the federal debt during a time of peace.
He has left us with bond yields, meaning how are we going to finance that debt?
We have to sell Treasury bonds.
And the Treasury bonds have gotten more expensive because of Joe Biden's policies.
So you go issue after issue.
Oil prices are now shooting through the roof in the final two months of Joe Biden's administration, in part because of decisions that Joe Biden has made over the last few weeks.
He actually hasn't left the American people in good economic condition.
That's why they made Donald J. Trump the president-elect of the United States.
So we've got a lot of work to do.
I remain fundamentally, and you know this, Shannon, I'll always be an optimist about our country.
But I think that that optimism has to start with a bit of realism.
And the real truth is that Joe Biden has left us a dumpster fire.
Donald Trump is going to have to put it out, but he's good at doing that.
Okay, we're going to...
Okay, let me help you, Joe.
J.D. That's a pretty long answer.
You're all over the place.
You could have answered it with six or seven words.
Do you believe the government?
Or do you believe the people, Shannon?
Shannon Breen at Fox News.
People don't see the economy getting better.
The people are looking at their food supply being destroyed with this nonsense about bird flu.
And so, you know, the bureaucrats, we found them lying up.
Oh, look, got this great jobs number.
Where have you been, Shannon?
Do you believe those?
After we had...
Nearly a million jobs that were faked.
And then when you dig down into when they pull back the fake job stuff, you see that almost all the jobs that were supposedly created were people getting jobs with the federal government.
I don't know, but I think the American people saw something different.
And I think the American people don't believe the bureaucrats.
The question is, why would you believe them, Shannon?
Are you going to believe the bureaucrats?
Who lie to you on a regular basis?
Or are you going to believe the American people who said this economy has got to go in a different direction?
That's a simple answer.
We've got Mike Waltz, who is now talking about what's coming up.
You know, we had Trump as a peace president, right?
Just like Woodrow Wilson, who got us into World War I, was a peace president in FDR. Who got us into World War II, was the peace president.
And now we've got Mike Waltz saying the Trump administration is going to ask, ask, Ukraine to lower its conscription age.
Right now, they can draft you at the age of 25. And they want it lowered to 18, like they do to their own slaves.
Trump's incoming national security advisor, Mike Waltz, said the Trump administration will ask Ukraine to lower the age of conscription.
So more troops can be sent to the front lines.
The Biden administration has also been doing that.
And let's take a look at them, just so that you see that there's no difference in this area, yet again, between Trump...
And Biden?
You know, the other thing that we're going to need to see is really stabilizing things on the battlefield.
And one of the things that we'll be asking of the Ukrainians is they have real manpower issues.
You know, their draft age right now is 26 years old, not 18. I don't think a lot of people realize that they could generate hundreds of thousands of new soldiers.
So when we hear about morale problems, when we hear about issues on the front, Look, if the Ukrainians have asked the entire world to be all in for democracy, we need them to be all in for democracy.
And they certainly have fought bravely.
They certainly have taken a very noble and tough stand.
But we need to see those manpower shortages addressed.
This isn't just about munitions, ammunition, or writing more checks.
It's about seeing the front lines stabilized so that we can enter into some type of deal.
Yeah, we need, it's not just about money and weapons.
We need blood, right?
He says, think about, they could generate hundreds of thousands of new soldiers and feed them into the meat grinder for NATO's geopolitical aspirations.
Not another person needs to die for that.
Not another person.
How despicable this guy is.
This Republican congressman from Florida, Mike Waltz, who is going to be the national security advisor, is saying that the war in Ukraine is about democracy?
It's not about democracy at all, you idiot!
This is like what the people, the Vietnamese, said to McNamara when he came back.
They said, don't you remember, domino theory?
Don't you realize we've been fighting the Chinese for a thousand years?
And they're still fighting.
They're still fighting over territory and water now.
The Chinese and the Vietnamese.
But it wasn't a domino theory.
And this is not about democracy, folks.
Russia has had control of the Ukraine.
And I say it as the Ukraine.
It's a region of Russia.
From 400 years ago until about 30 years ago.
And then the U.S. and the CIA and these people split it off and then used it as a leverage to attack Russia.
Why is it that so many people in Crimea, you had the U.K. defense minister, said, well, we beat the Russians in Crimea once before, we'll beat them again there now.
That's right.
That was the Crimean War back in the late 1800s.
And you were fighting Russia, and you were fighting them in Crimea, because Crimea was Russia.
Until you decided that you wanted to use it for your geopolitical ambitions, and now you want more people to go on the meat grinder.
Whether it's Republican or Democrat, there's no difference.
This is Jake Sullivan.
Their conscription age, as of a year ago, was 27. It's kind of remarkable, compared to how we do things, that from 18 to 27, you're exempt from the draft.
They lowered it to 25. They've made a series of other changes to their law to facilitate people under the age of 25 entering.
But you have to recognize that the manpower issue in Ukraine is an issue that has evolved over time.
It has become more acute over the course of the past year.
And the need for Ukraine to be able to fully populate its brigades and battalions as we have flowed in a massive quantity of the munitions and military equipment they need, it has grown.
And we've made no bones about that, and we have briefed the new team on that.
So, let's see what happens now on a going-forward basis.
That's ultimately a sovereign decision.
Anyway, whatever.
You know, I can't listen to these people anymore.
When this whole thing kicked off, you had military analysts in India that were not allied with either side.
And you had many others who were saying it.
People like McGregor, Douglas McGregor, were saying, they're going to fight them to the last Ukrainian.
All right, so we've exhausted those above 25, so let's get down to the ones that are 18 now, right?
It's despicable.
By the way, Mike Waltz doesn't even know what the age is.
He said it was 26, it's 25. Jake Sullivan said, well, it was 27, and then we lowered it to 25. And then Mike Waltz says, 26 years old.
They corrected that in the transcript, and they said, well, it's actually 26. 25. So, yeah, when we look at this, we've got, you know, when we talk about Crimea, just take a look at what Trump is talking about with his grandiose, imperialistic vision of Greenland and Panama.
Greenland and Panama were never a part of America, but Ukraine and Crimea, all that area, a part of Russia for as long as America has existed.
And yet Panama and Greenland and Canada, you want to throw them into it?
They were never a part of America.
Where's the justification for that?
There isn't at all.
Waltz also said in the interview that a ceasefire would be a positive first step.
He hoped it would happen soon, that it would allow us to enter into the framework of some type of negotiated solution there.
We'll see how that works.
You know, Trump is worse, even, than the imperialists.
You know, Teddy Roosevelt said we're going to walk softly and carry a big stick.
Well, what Trump does is he shouts loudly, and he hopes that they don't call us bluff.
And I hope that they don't, too.
We'll see what happens with it.
Before we get to the comments here, I'm going to take a quick break, and we will be right back, folks.
����
���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. Yeah, best of Whistler right there.
We were just talking, Karen and I were talking.
He said, yeah, it's got his facial expressions because that's what he did.
He recorded his facial expressions, reading it, and then transferred it into Zelensky's voice.
Yeah, let's talk a little bit about that.
NATO boss warns members to start learning Russian.
Maybe you could sing the song I just played there.
That's where you start.
Sing a song.
Yeah, this globalist trader, by the way, the NATO boss, this globalist trader that was thrown out by his own country, the Netherlands, Mark Ruta, because he tried to destroy their food supply and make everybody dependent on synthetic food that was grown and then delivered, grown by Bill Gates, and then delivered by Picnic, which was...
This organization funded by Gates, but also with ties to his family as well.
So they voted him out.
And then he became head of NATO. And this is what he's saying.
He says European members of NATO need to drastically increase their military spending or they need to start studying Russian.
The old domino conspiracy theory again here, isn't it?
Yeah.
Globalist trader.
Traitor to his own people.
Depopulationist.
Mark Ruta.
His remarks came during a question-and-answer period at the end of a joint meeting of the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs.
While two-thirds of NATO members are now meeting the bloc's 2014 target of spending 2% of their gross domestic product on the military, that's not enough.
Not enough to protect them from Moscow, said Ruta.
Again, send me your money while I shut down farms.
As part of my globalist depopulation agenda.
And look, remember that the MAGA crowd and the MAGA media were telling you Trump is talking about getting out of NATO. No, he wasn't.
No, he wasn't.
He was talking about, you know, he mentioned that a couple of times.
He wasn't serious about it.
What he wanted was for them, he says, if you guys don't pony up and pay your 2% of your GDP into war, I'm going to get out of NATO. And so they did.
And what was the purpose of that?
That was to arm up for this war with Russia.
Trump was preparing them for that.
It's a tag team match, folks.
Just like professional wrestling.
Goes over to the ropes, slaps out with Biden, and Biden comes in and takes over.
You know, I mean, it's just professional wrestling.
Left, right, left, right.
The march of tyranny.
I just want you to spend more money.
That's a quote.
You know, if you can't shut down the farms in your country, you can at least bankrupt the people there with war.
And who knows?
Maybe we'll get a war.
That'd be another depopulation.
That'd be even faster than starving people by shutting down the food supply.
He says, I've not committed to a new number.
I'm just saying 2% is not nearly enough.
So, Trump has flowed the idea of boosting the spending to 5% now.
So, he was selling 2% when he was president the first time.
Now he wants it to go up to 5%.
He's selling war, folks.
That's what he's selling.
But no NATO member, Washington included, is anywhere near that number at present.
So, you know, Trump was never forgetting out of NATO. He was never forgetting out of any war or war organization.
He didn't.
Obama.
Under Obama, we had seven wars going.
Seven wars.
Trump didn't stop a single one.
He kept them all going.
And he didn't get out of NATO. He kept it going.
As a matter of fact, he built it up.
The mission was to push the EU to arm so they could have NATO aggression, which is what this is.
The U.S. currently accounts.
For 60% of NATO's military spending at the moment, without Washington, the European NATO members would need to boost their expenditures up to 10% of their GDP. Now, Ruta is saying that Putin is spending, or Russia is spending 9% of its GDP on the military.
And he says it's easier for them because they don't have our bureaucracy.
Isn't it nice, you know, when, don't you like it when Ruta and Trudeau And these other World Economic Forum globalists like to say, well, you know, if only I could be like Communist China or our enemy, Putin, you know, who can do anything that they want because they're not constrained by a democracy or a rule of law or a constitution or a bureaucracy even.
They can do whatever they want.
Isn't that nice?
Trudeau said that about China and Ruta is saying that about Russia.
Putin has put that number at 6.3% instead of 9%.
But just think about this.
If the EU believes that Putin is really a threat, well, why wouldn't they spend that kind of money, right?
And what they're looking at is trying to push this up to levels that Putin is doing, but they don't believe that Putin is the aggressor, so they're not matching even those funds.
The EU, folks, is more dangerous to Europeans than Putin is.
Just like our government is more dangerous to us than any other foreign government.
Any other foreign government.
German Chancellor Schultz has blocked a 3 billion euro arms package to Ukraine because he's got an election coming up.
And just like Trump, after the election, he'll betray these people if he wins, right?
Just wait until after the election and see what this guy does.
Their election is coming up February the 23rd.
Chancellor Schultz has opposed the proposal over fears of further alienating disillusioned voters ahead of the vote.
Got to deceive them.
They're starting to figure out what's going on.
So let's pretend that we're something that we're not.
Schultz's Social Democrat Party.
Has plummeted in the polls and is currently in a course to attain 14% in the election next month, down from 26% in the last vote.
And again, they always, since they have multi-party elections, instead of the duopoly that we have here, it's very rare for anybody to get 50% of the vote.
So they usually form a coalition with another party.
The SPD has formed a...
Coalition with the Greens.
That's the governing people.
Socialists and Greens.
And so, we'll see what happens to this.
It's down to 14%.
And their response to that kind of failure, their response to that kind of arrogant detachment from what the people really want, is to ban their political opposition that is soaring.
The alternative for Deutschland.
They want to ban them and to punish their members everywhere.
It confirms what they are.
Tyrants.
Tyrants.
59% of Germans support resuming direct communication between Schultz and Putin, hoping to advance peace negotiation.
Sounds like 60% of the Germans don't want war.
Imagine that.
But they're outvoted by a couple of politicians, aren't they?
A couple of political parties.
The German view is reflected across much of Europe, even amongst citizens in Ukraine's most fervent allies.
Last month, a new survey in Poland showed 55% of the Polish population now supports ending the war in Ukraine, even if it means that Ukraine loses territory to Moscow.
So even in Poland.
Where there is a residual hatred of Russia from the years of oppression.
People don't want war, but the politicians do.
And that's what we have in America as well.
People don't want war, but the politicians do.
China and Russia trade, by the way, when we talk about the economic warfare, we're losing that big time.
That's pretty easy to see, as I pointed out when Biden put in the sanctions.
A couple things happened.
First of all, they couldn't really enforce the sanctions, and Putin started paying in gold.
Since they seized and stole a lot of their assets in the financial system, they weaponized that financial system.
But they could grab their money that was in the banks and in the financial system, but they still had gold and they still had real assets to trade.
That's a lesson for each and every one of us, isn't it?
And so what Putin did was he gave a tremendous discount to people who would pay gold for oil.
And he wound up making $300 billion more than he did under the previous system because the price of oil skyrocketed after Biden started throwing economic weight around.
So we lost that in that regard.
We also lose it in the sense that China and Russia are much closer together.
Their trade together hit a record high last year.
It only slightly went up from the previous year, but in 2023, year over year, from 2022 to 2023, there was a 26% surge in trade between China and Russia.
Trade between China and the U.S. grew by 3.7% in 2024. But it is like a fire hose, what is going on between China and Russia.
Spencer DeLong says, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that.
Thank you.
He said, good morning all, David.
I missed the show live yesterday, but I wanted to wish you and Karen a happy belated anniversary.
God bless.
Thank you very much.
And God has blessed us.
You know, look, we don't take for granted or take it lightly that we've had 45 years together.
So many different things can happen.
And in this society, nobody really honors marriage, so we're both blessed to come from families that did.
And we've both been blessed to be able to survive this long.
Anything can happen.
And so we really are thankful to God for that.
And it's really been a blessing, and even more so than the 45 years we spent together.
It's the fact that all but seven years after we first got married and then the time that I spent at Infowars, the rest of the time, the two of us have worked together with each other all day, working on our own businesses and that type of thing.
So that's really been a blessing.
And we really want to thank...
All of you who support the program and support our family here working on this program.
It's not just me that's doing this.
I get a lot of support from the entire family.
Karen, Travis, Whistler, all of them are helping with that.
So thank you very much for that.
Psalm 144, thank you for the tip.
That's very kind.
At works, I can't listen live.
But I was listening to yesterday's show and heard it was y'all's anniversary.
So congrats and I think it's cool that you guys get to do this together.
May the Lord bless you with many more years.
Thank you.
Treat yourself to a nice meal of the bugs.
By the way, we didn't do anything at all for our anniversary.
We tried to stay warm by the fire because we had a problem with our heating system.
And it was back in December.
We got it fixed and it's not even 30 days and it's out again.
So we got a fire and that's it for heat.
And we got it upstairs and the heat works up there too.
There's no heat on the main floor.
There is some heat here in the studio.
The studio's got a different system, and so we do have some heat in here, so we kind of hang in here to work.
But hopefully they're going to be out pretty soon to fix that, because it's been really cold here.
But we couldn't get down the hill to go anywhere, and pretty much everything was closed anyway.
We went down the hill to make sure...
To make sure that the chickens were okay.
And yeah, their water was frozen and everything.
So we fixed them up and got back in the car and we couldn't make it back up the hill again.
So we had to walk up the hill the other day in the snow, which was a bit dodgy.
But we made it.
Nothing happened.
So we're grateful for that.
Atomic Dog.
David, you might like this fun fact.
In January 2024, Elon Musk's net worth was $250 billion.
Today, he's worth $424 billion.
I know.
I've talked about that.
I mentioned the fact.
He gives $250 million to Trump, and he gets a couple hundred billion more.
And that's on par.
Typically, people who buy favors from politicians have a tremendous return on investment.
It's not uncommon to see people who give money to politicians get a thousand times their money back.
And that's what he got.
They are a great investment.
If only I could afford one.
I'm not investing in Trump, though.
Sprumford, they're trapped.
They have to keep spending, which is why the system will fail.
And it's designed to fail.
And it's a mathematical certainty.
That's right.
And in Sprumford, it's not just America, either, as we've talked about it.
The debt, leveraged debt, is global.
And so what is coming is the great taking.
And we're in the final stages of that, where they want to get control of your stuff with tokenization and securitization.
They don't want to stop at real estate.
That's how this fourth turning kicked off, with an economic crisis that tokenized and securitized in a scam.
Mortgages created a crisis.
Now they want to extend that to everything.
Everything.
And that's how they make sure that we own nothing.
That's what's coming.
Don't frag me, bro.
Their game plan is old and predictable.
Crash the economy, implement austerity and rationing, and offer war as the solution.
Yep, they've done it all.
And that's what generally happens in these fourth turnings.
As Strauss and Howe said, they saw this pattern of about every 80 years, about every four generations.
You'd have major economic disruption, usually accompanied by war.
And the institutions would get reset and everything.
Then you go through, you know, another four generations and everybody's reaction just keeps repeating.
They went back through 500 years of history.
And so that is exactly what they want to do with this.
Matthew Ronson, Tulsi, lifelong ardent Marxist jumps on the Trump train.
Yeah, I don't know what her background was.
I didn't know that she was a Marxist.
I'll have to look into that.
I know Booty Gay, big time.
Big time Marxist and his father was as well.
Guard Goldsmith.
Good to see you, Guard.
Liberty Conspiracy.
The weeknights on Twitter as well as on Rockfin.
He says the Fourth Amendment does not distinguish between searches that the government wants to do so on people in the U.S. versus foreigners.
The system requires warrants, real warrants for all searches.
Good point.
Good point.
And so, right there, it is...
I remember reading a quote from a guy.
Now, this is back at the beginning of the 20th century, when spying stuff was just getting started, right?
If you go back and you look at Sidney Riley, the guy that was...
Ian Fleming's model for James Bond, because Ian Fleming was in the intelligence agencies.
And at the very beginning, and I forget now whether it was a U.S. or a U.K. guy who was in the intelligence agency.
And so they're talking about spying on people.
And he stepped back and he said, Gentlemen, do not read other gentlemen's mail.
Well, we're not talking about gentlemen here.
And we're talking about oath breakers and law breakers and criminals and people who not only lie, cheat, steal, kill, commit assassinations and coups, but we're talking about people who have classes on all of those things, as we were told.
So, DGA, thank you for the tip, says David.
The Trump cult says they love the Constitution and they have so much trust in Trump.
Even if it looks like a violation, they believe that he would never violate it.
They forget COVID, the red flag laws.
The Democrats are so organized during BLM and the anti-file riots that they made sure those lawbreakers never spent a day in jail.
Yeah, what's up with that?
Republicans are leaving the J6ers to rot in prison cells.
See, that's the other thing about it, you know?
The Democrats, as much as I despise what they want to do, and full-on Marxists and lawbreakers and all the rest of this stuff, they do have, they do do what they...
Republicans say that they're going to do.
They tell you what they're going to do, and then they try to do it.
The Republicans will lie to you about what they want to do.
They'll tell you one thing, and they'll do something else.
And the Democrats will stick with their people and protect them.
And the Republicans will stab them in the back.
And I've said that all along.
I said the difference between the Democrats, you think of them as an enemy army that is carrying a flag and wearing a uniform and coming at you, but the Republicans are the fifth column.
They're the ones that are inside the city that are going to stab you in the back.
That's why I don't like either party.
Somebody said something.
It was a couple of months ago or something.
Some new person got on and said, well, David really doesn't like this person or something.
Somebody else said, he doesn't like anybody.
Not in politics, I don't.
I don't trust any of them.
Sorry.
Harps.
Good to see you, Harps, now in Australia.
Amendment 8. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
That's right.
And that's what's happening with all this stuff.
There's not anything in there, I guess you could say, cruel and unusual punishments.
That would cover the torture that was done to these people in the jails.
We also have provisions for speedy trials.
They kept people there waiting for quite some time while they were abusing them in jail.
Punishing them in jail.
And you know that this thing is a kangaroo court when there's not a single person.
And we've got video.
People who just walked in.
Like I've talked about the two elderly men and one of them had a son.
You know, they were like in their 70s or whatever.
They needed to go to the bathroom.
They asked the police who were standing by the open door either side.
Yeah, sure.
The bathroom's right in here.
They got charged.
When they got out...
There was a female officer who tried to direct them onto the floor of the Congress and said, no, I don't want to go in.
I just wanted to come in and use the bathroom.
They left.
They're looking at years in prison.
Years in prison.
Abandoned by Trump.
Abandoned by J.D. Vance, apparently.
We'll see what happens.
Again, we'll know.
We'll know in six days.
We're going to finally find out here.
I hope I'm wrong.
I don't want to see...
These people suffer anymore, just to prove my point about Trump.
My point about Trump has been proven because these people suffered for four years.
I just hope that now he has been shamed into action by what Biden has done.
Established presence.
Says, I went to keep others safe in case the Antifa types showed up.
I didn't even step on the grass, and I got arrested.
Wow.
Yeah.
And how did that happen?
A lot of these people got intercepted because Bank of America profiled what they were doing.
You want to tell me we don't have CBDC now?
That was the indication of what's going on with that stuff.
They kept records.
They even said, oh, let's do something else.
Let's look at all the people that were in Washington on January the 6th.
We're going to track them.
We'll use the phone companies.
We'll also use the...
Transactions that they've done.
That's what Bank of America did.
And the Bank of America goes back and said, and let's see if any of these people ever bought guns.
Oh, yeah.
Let's turn all that information voluntarily over to the FBI. DG8 says, David, Trump supports immunity for all law enforcement.
He loves civil asset forfeiture.
Do these cops during J6 deserve immunity?
Cops arresting moms, taking their kids to the park during COVID? Yeah.
He despises Bill of Rights.
You know, I always said that about Biden.
Biden made it very clear, all the way back to the confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas.
But Trump made it pretty clear, didn't he, in his first term, even before 2020, how he despised the Constitution, the Second Amendment.
Travel on.
Smash that like button.
Give DK the credit he deserves.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
DG8 also.
Thank you again.
He says, David, does J.D. Vance not know that Trump added $8 trillion to the national debt?
The repo market failure of 2019. Do they forget that Trump was already president?
How convenient.
Yeah.
Major case of amnesia.
And, you know, look, there's two kinds of never-Trumpers, and they're just two faces of the Trump coin.
On the one side, you've got the people who are absolutely deranged about Trump's personality, and they can never stand him.
That's the never-Trumpers that they always talk about.
But on the other side, on the flip side of that Trump coin, are the conservatives who love him so dearly that they'll make an excuse for anything that he does.
They are never-Trumpers who are not deranged, but they are deluded.
So you have the derangement on the one side, the Democrats.
And then on the other side, you've got the MAGA people who are deluded, delusional, delusional, never-Trumpers.
So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Making sense.
Common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Alright, welcome back.
Let's take a look at some of the Just Stop Oil radicals.
They defaced Charles Darwin's grave in Westminster Abbey.
Here's a video of what they were doing.
And of course, it's a shrine.
It's kind of interesting, you know, they've got...
We've already passed through the 1.5 degree that was supposed to keep us safe.
Millions are being displaced.
California is on fire.
And three-quarters of all wildlife has disappeared since the 1970s.
This is Darwin's grave.
He would be turning in his grave.
We're in the midst of the sixth grave extinction.
Our government...
So, they're destroying what they love.
Charles Darwin Oil, gas, and coal By 2030 Delusional Useful idiots, aren't they?
Absolutely amazing.
You know, Darwin is really on their side.
You know, these people are descendants of Darwin.
Not of apes.
But of Darwin, these earth worshippers really came from him, this whole idea.
By the way, 1.5 is dead.
Okay, then why aren't we?
That was the doomsday point, they said.
And by their own metrics, we have passed the doomsday point of no return already.
But of course, that hasn't set California on fire.
As a matter of fact, there's some real interesting things that have surfaced about California being on fire.
Here's a picture of simultaneous California fires starting.
Look at this.
Popping up all at once, three of them.
Starting all at once.
Now this is time-lapsed, but they start about the same time, all three of them.
Oh, isn't that interesting?
Isn't it interesting how selective climate change is?
It can focus on three spots and start fires simultaneously in those three spots.
It's not about that at all.
It's not about that oil either.
It's not about that at oil.
So the Just Stop Oil activist defaced Charles Darwin's grave.
See, if they believed God's word, then they would understand that he'd created a symbiotic...
Relationship with CO2 and animals and plants and all the rest of this stuff.
But they don't understand symbiotic relationships because they are idiotic.
They're just useful idiots.
And, you know, they would not be panicked.
Look, stewardship is a thing.
You know, we need to exercise good stewardship and care of the land.
But it's not going to be the end of the world.
It's not going to be the end of humanity.
These people will be the end of humanity if they were to get their way.
Not all of humanity, but they would end most of our lives because they're the ones who are the depopulationists.
So again, 1.5 is dead, they said.
Well, then your argument is dead.
And just like Charles Darwin, the false prophets of their religion are essentially dead as well.
The radical group, which often uses paintings to paint to vandalize great works of art.
By the way, they just cut up a picture of Lord Balfour.
I mean, they just cut it to pieces.
The guy who kicked off this whole Zionism thing.
At least they're picking the right targets here.
Darwin, Balfour, all these different people.
World leaders must stop burning oil, gas, and coal by 2030, they said.
Really?
Or else what?
Or as...
Thomas Sowell said, so what?
And he also said, prove it.
We've already passed one and a half degrees centigrade.
Just take the Jimmy Carter approach to adultery.
Well, hey, we might as well just go for three degrees then, right?
If you think that that is doing it, that didn't do it, and it wasn't man-made.
But if you think that's the case, we're already done.
So let's just go for the full thing.
Let's go full three degrees of whatever it is.
Just Stop Oil is not the only leftist group to target the 19th century English naturalist in recent years, Charles Darwin.
In 2020, for example, Britain's National History Museum got pressure from Black Lives Matter.
Well, now, they were right about that, because Darwin was a racist eugenicist.
Just look at what he says.
I mean, it's absolutely amazing.
And all these people were.
You know, the people who followed him, the people who, you know, that ex-club, which I really do think that might explain Elon Musk's ex-fascination.
There was the ex-club, and it was Thomas Huxley and, you know, following him, his grandkids.
Aldous Huxley and Julian Huxley.
Aldous gave us the dystopian vision of Brave New World, and Julian gave us the idea of transhumanism and all the rest of this stuff, but they were very associated with H.G. Wells, was a student of Thomas Huxley, and the X Club that was there.
All these people were eugenicists, they were transhumanists, they were technocrats, they and their followers.
And racist as well.
Real racist, I mean.
Not the phony liberal stuff where everybody, racist, racist.
No, I mean, these people are genuinely racist.
But that's where we are.
So, if you look at this story, though, this is a Canadian boy that doctors in Canada nearly killed him.
They wanted to harvest his organs.
Because he drowned, and he was unconscious for quite some time, and there was severe injury to him.
His parents fought for him, but why would you, if you believe in Darwin, and if you believe in survival of the fittest, you just throw people like this Canadian boy under the bus, right?
As a matter of fact, Nishi despised pity.
That was his big gripe with Christianity, that Christians had pity.
Now, shouldn't have any pity on anybody, right?
This is a Quebec boy who suffered a drowning incident, was given up on by the Montreal Children's Hospital.
He's now been given another chance at life by a children's hospital in Louisiana.
The two-and-a-half-year-old son of a New Orleans native drowned on October 8th.
He subsequently was revived with CPR, resuscitated.
He was then moved to Montreal Children's Hospital.
Where he received, quote, good service, unquote, for about five to six weeks, after which doctors decided that he had no chance of survival or would remain in a vegetative state for years.
The doctors said that they were going to remove him from life support November the 29th, stating that his organs were good for donation.
These ghouls.
This is, you know, again, Canada has jumped into euthanasia.
And organ donation, unless you're talking about something like a kidney, organ donation is keeping the patient alive and then killing them by extracting the organs.
They don't want to extract organs from a person who's just died or a person that they've just killed.
They want them fresh.
So Nicholas claimed that his son was over-drugged, and he was told by the hospital that his son was, quote, good for garbage, unquote.
But he did his own research.
See, folks, you know, when you hear these ask-your-doctor commercials, don't ask your doctor.
Don't ask your doctor.
Don't ask your doctor for permission.
Be your doctor.
Don't ask your doctor.
Be your doctor.
You need to start taking control over our own research and over our own lives.
I'm going to be talking about that coming up as well.
So, Nicholas the father, Did his own research and he contacted top doctors who then called Montreal Children's Hospital recommending that they increase Arthur's oxygen to 30% for about 45 minutes to an hour each day and do that twice a day.
This treatment has shown positive results, but the hospital refused.
Oh, of course.
Also recommended was hyperbaric oxygen, oxygen under pressure.
The Quebec doctor said they had no proof that it would work, and they weren't going to try it.
Among the doctors contacted were Dr. Paul Hark, a Louisiana specialist on hyperbaric oxygen treatment, and a child rehabilitation specialist, Dr. Pierre Meroy, who had spoken together at a conference about hyperbaric oxygen treatment.
Marcoy visited Arthur at Montreal Children's and was surprised that they were considering removing him from life support at that point.
Dr. Hart was not surprised at the hospital's reaction, however, stating that it is pretty typical for doctors to write off children with injuries as serious as Arthur's, and that parents suggesting an unconventional treatment like hyperbaric oxygen can result in a confrontational situation.
You know, how much does that cost them, right?
That's not going to be nearly as expensive as pharmaceuticals and other things like that.
So, the father and mother cleared out their retirement account, took all the money out, and they flew their son by air ambulance to New Orleans.
Now, here is where Canada is not as bad as the UK. We've had multiple stories of a child or adults.
In the UK, under the Bureaucratic Government National Health Service, that refused to allow people, you know, they found a specialist somewhere that offered them some hope, had a treatment that had had some success for the particular condition.
And we've had multiple stories that I reported on through the years where the UK government health care system refused to allow them to leave and killed them.
At least in Canada, they allowed the family to take their child out.
So, the father is very angry about it.
He said he promised that he would conduct an investigation of what happened.
He said, we have all the names and everything.
Just watch out the next month and the weeks to come and what's going to come.
Just mark my words, we have all the names of the people.
We have everything telling you some heads are going to fall when I'm finished doing my investigation.
Well, I hope so.
But I seriously doubt it.
They will cover for each other.
Ben Mulroney, the son of the former Canadian Premier, Brian Mulroney, said the father went against the wishes of his son's Canadian doctors, sending him to the United States for treatment.
Had he stayed in Canada, he would have died.
But now, after 30 days in the U.S., he is out of the intensive care unit and he is recovering well.
You see, it's parents and not bureaucrats that love their children.
You need to be skeptical of these doctors.
You need to stay away from public health, and you need to stay away from public education as well.
They will come after your kids.
This is a story about a new school that has an out-of-the-box approach.
They say it could transform education in the United States.
This is not actually a new idea.
Maybe the first time it's been tried by a school.
But this is something that was done by John Taylor Gatto.
Gatto, I think is his name.
Gatto.
It's been a while.
He won the Teacher of the Year Award at least once.
I think it was twice.
In New York.
He taught in New York City.
And what he would do with kids in high school was he would arrange field trips.
And he was constantly taking them out of the class.
He hated the classroom.
He talked many times about how bad.
This whole idea of education by classroom is.
He said, what is it that we're doing?
You know, you tell these kids, you come in here and for 50 minutes we're going to talk to you about something.
Then we're going to ring the bell and you're going to go do something completely different.
And you're always sitting there passively listening, never doing anything.
He wanted to get the kids out, get them exposed to the real world, constantly taking them on field trips and everything.
And the kids loved it.
And they thrived under that.
And then, after a couple of these awards were given to him, he was a big critic, and he resigned.
And he became a big advocate for homeschooling.
Because, you see, this is not something that is new.
That's what homeschooling is.
And the idea, and this is being tried in Texas, just outside of Dallas, students not only learn in the classroom, but also learn on the job.
Abbott is talking about it.
Some others are saying, this is a testament to our mission of inspiring future generations through practical experiences that go beyond the traditional school setting.
By working alongside professionals, students develop critical thinking, communication, and problem-solving skills that prepare them for both higher education and for the workforce.
And again, that's good.
I think it's a very good thing.
And if you think that schooling, It's about preparing people for college or the workforce.
You're still missing the point.
It's great to have a vocation.
It's great to have a career.
Those are not to be despised.
Those are really good things to have.
However, the purpose of moral education is moral.
And that should come first.
That's what real education is about.
It's not about training somebody for a vocation or for a job.
But those are good things, and that is a nice move, but you don't have to necessarily go that way.
And we have seen the same thing being done all the time by homeschooling parents.
well we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back the common man .
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
TheDavidKnightShow.com
listening to The David Knight Show.
Yeah, and I thought I would just play that.
It's not two Christmas scenes.
A lot of snow scenes and things like that from the Christmas album.
Octospook says, J6ers need to be released and replaced with those who committed the crimes against them and against the Constitution and the American people, quite frankly.
I agree.
Risha M. says, the eugenicists never want to start with themselves for some reason.
There's always somebody else.
There's always the poor and the helpless that they have absolutely no pity on.
Let's talk a little bit about Emperor Trump, and that's going to be coming up.
You know, when I gave the history yesterday of this Martyrs Day in Panama and how that whole thing started, oh, well, we're going to fly both flags and everything, and then some kids at a high school.
American high school that were there.
No, we're only going to put up the American flag.
We're not going to put up the Panama flag.
And so that became a bone of contention.
It resulted in riots.
You had people dying on both sides and all the rest of the stuff, all over a flag.
Well, now we've got, with Trump and Biden, we have fights over the flag again.
Will you put up the American flag at full mast, or will you do it at half mast, right?
Because, and again, it was Biden trolling Trump and saying, we're going to fly the flag at half-mast for Jimmy Carter for 30 days, and that includes the inauguration.
Well, Trump is flying the U.S. flag at full height before the end of the 30-day mourning period following Carter's death.
And then you also have, to virtue signal about this, you have Governor Abbott in Texas is also ordering flags raised for Trump's inauguration.
There you go.
Virtue signaling for the MAGA people.
It never ends, does it?
And then in Canada, we have Pierre Palliev, a conservative leader, I guess, claims the U.S. benefits.
For a massive price discount on Canadian energy as tariffs are looming.
He's got a difficult row to hoe here because he doesn't want to offend conservatives.
Many of them in Canada are as enamored of Trump as the MAGA people are.
I say this worldwide.
I'm a man without a country here.
Uh, and so he can't really come out and criticize Trump for his threats about tariffs.
Instead, he has to say, well, you know, we've got a common cause here and we're actually your friends when it comes to Canadian energy.
Um, Trump has proposed a 25% tariff on all Canadian goods.
And so Pierre Polyev says that Trump should remember that the U.S. benefits from cheap Canadian oil, which they've been selling at a, quote, massive price discount.
Well, there's a reason for that, and I'll get into that.
According to Polyev, this has allowed American refineries to have profited at Canada's expense, adding that tariffs on Canadian energy would mean many Americans would lose their job and that both countries are better off without them so that the U.S. can continue to get, quote, low-cost, totally reliable, 100% ally energy.
That's the best kind of energy, isn't it?
Ally energy.
Well, the best kind is actually coal, but we can't talk about coal.
I would remind our American friends that they benefit from our affordable, reliable energy, and the alternative is Venezuela, Iran, and other foreign dictatorships.
Why would we not want to have a North American energy market that enriches us both?
The U.S.'s largest consumer of Canadian oil and gas, receiving 97%.
The majority, 87%, is coming from Alberta, the country's largest oil-producing region.
And it was Danielle Smith, the premier of Alberta, that was just recently in Mar-a-Lago, to presumably kiss the ring.
Adding that he would consider using economic force to merge the two countries, said Trump.
I mean, this is the point.
Let's split everybody up.
Let's get everybody fighting.
We're not going to work together cooperatively.
So, according to Trump, America, instead, is subsidizing Canada, he said.
And the U.S. doesn't actually need the northern neighbor for things like lumber, dairy, or automobiles.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the U.S. trade deficit with Canada amounted to 68 billion U.S. dollars.
Canada estimates that the surplus with the United States was $80 billion.
Officials in Alberta say the federal government's cancellation of pipeline projects to deliver Canadian oil and gas to other markets has meant that Canada has to sell its energy at a deeper discount to the United States.
They're not doing it because they like us.
But, you know, Trump says, well, I might use economic force.
To merge the two countries.
I don't think he's going to do that.
I know a lot of people are looking at, certainly, what he's talking about.
Looks like the North American Union, or looks like the Region 1 of the New World Order.
I don't think he's going to get that with Canada.
But it is going to be disruptive.
And we're going to have to see what he does.
And I'm really concerned about how disruptive Trump is going to be.
But when it comes to Greenland, it's a different story.
Oh, to look around at the patch of ground Known as Mother Nature's sieve Though it's horrible to visit It's a miserable place to live That's right.
That's Greenland.
That's the Greenland anthem right there.
Or it will be, if I have any say so.
More than half of Greenlanders want to join the United States.
This is a question of, do you want to be a millionaire?
I'm serious.
I mean, that's what they're talking about doing.
Buying the people off.
Who knows how much money they're going to throw at them.
And of course, the area, Mother Nature's sieve, is filled with all kinds of great stuff.
Oil and all other things.
You know, I showed you the video that Goat Tree sent to me.
Some guy's walking around.
They're finding rubies on the ground there.
I mean, it's amazing.
It's a vast area to look around.
It may be a horrible place to visit, but there's all kinds of natural resources there.
And so you could look at this and say, well, that's a deal.
Let's pay him a few billion dollars and look at all the wealth that we could get with that.
But that wealth is not going to be going to you and I. It's going to be going to Trump's pals.
That's what this is about.
It'll be private profits and it'll be a public expenditure for that.
57% of Greenland's population supports Trump's proposal.
Of course they have.
They've got dollar signs in their eyes.
Who would blame them?
Those rejecting Trump's proposal stands at only 37%, with 5% of the people undecided.
And, of course, the president of Greenland has been saying that, prime minister, not a president, he stressed on Friday, We do not want to be Danish, and we don't want to be American.
We want to be Greenlandic.
And you have the Trump people are saying, we need Greenland for national security purposes.
No, that's an absolute lie.
And their actions show that it's a lie.
Before there were satellites, before there were long-range weapons, as I pointed out yesterday, they had a massive military base that is still there.
It's not a big security issue.
Not with the technology that is there now.
That's a dodge.
There's something else.
I think that it is the resources grab for Trump's friends, but whatever it is, it's not about national security.
These people, unfortunately, are stationed there in this airbase getting DEI lessons when there's nobody around.
They seriously are.
Here's how you interact with the natives.
And it's like, where are the natives?
I don't know where they are.
But the prime minister said, well, we want it not to be American or Danish, but we want to be Greenlandic.
But he said, I'm ready to talk.
So he's open to making a deal, right?
The island is rich in gold and silver and copper and uranium and deposits, believed to have vast oil reserves as well and territorial waters, and so that's, you know, one of the reasons why Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk are walking around and singing the praises of Greenland.
In Canada, meanwhile, you have radical leftist Jagmeet Singh calls for aggressive response to Trump's proposed tariffs.
But we'll have to see what happens.
It's going to be an aggressive response in the economy, I think, that'll happen there.
Crypto deregulation under Trump.
The promises versus the reality.
The incoming U.S. president will have the authority to enact many policies favorable to crypto users after taking office next week.
With seven days, now six.
Until Trump takes office, many of the crypto industry have been monitoring his prospective staff picks and his policy announcements since shifting from calling Bitcoin a scam in 2021 to claiming to embrace the technology during his 2024 presidential campaign.
I think that's true.
When you look at all the money that he grifted off of people with the NFTs, I'll take a piece of artwork and I'll put it on the blockchain and I'll charge you confiscatory amounts.
You know, he didn't shut down the scam.
He joined it.
He's a scam artist.
Trump made many promises to the digital asset industry that could affect regulation and enforcement.
So it's going to be whipsawing everybody from the Biden administration was trying to use every trick in the book to ban crypto by default, you know, through regulations and other things.
And now he's going to deregulate.
Trump promised to fire U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissioner Chair Gary Gensler on his first day in office.
The first day in office.
That's what we're talking about right here.
Other than making general promises to change the SEC's position on slandering, as he put it, the crypto industry and, quote, blocking ordinary Americans from all of this, we don't really know what he's going to do.
We'll have to wait and see.
Meanwhile, when we look at what's going to be happening next year with this administration, it's not just the fight over the flags being at full mast or half mast, but it's about the false flags.
And I've talked about this before.
When I first read that Sarah Adams, a former CIA targeting officer who now supposedly has left, she's been sheep-dipped.
And as she's going around all these different podcasts, the first one that she went on, which she broke all that information on, was Sean Ryan's podcast, a guy who was a Navy SEAL, but then he became CIA, and now he's supposedly gone as well.
But he has her on, and she's saying, well, this terrorist attack that happened in New Orleans is just the beginning.
Al-Qaeda has come across the border, and there's thousands of them, and they're going to be attacking us.
And that was pushed out there.
I immediately called that out for what it was.
Just propaganda laying the groundwork for them to do a false flag.
And then when all this stuff with the manifesto gets sent to Sean Ryan as well.
And then I went back and I looked at her interview.
And it was even worse than what is said in the transcript.
And she's doing it again, this CIA shill.
And this is what she's still selling the idea that we're going to have massive terrorist events coming up this next year.
And they can make that happen.
What do you anticipate?
What are these attacks looking like?
Are we going to see these quote-unquote one-offs like in New Orleans just randomly and with more frequency?
Do they have an October 7th style assault plan?
What are you expecting?
So we have both.
So we're first going to see the one-offs, and then we're probably going to see at least one U.S. embassy overseas targeted.
And then there is a large 9-11-style attack, but it's more like the Hamas attacks or like the Mumbai plot, you know, from 15 years ago.
And how the terrorists were trained, at least, is they went through urban warfare training and they went through suicide bomber training.
We believe about 10% of the attackers will be suicide bombers, but we also believe the suicide bombings aren't just going to occur on land, they're also going to occur in the air, on airplanes.
Gosh, that is so freaky.
Yeah, just like Operation Northwoods.
Amazing, yeah.
And she's got a very specific thing.
Remember, we've had people come out and say, 52% of the people who get bird flu are going to die.
Where did that come from?
You're just making that up.
Oh, no, they said 52%, so they must have some data somewhere.
No, they don't.
Nobody's ever died from this.
And you've got somebody who died with a PCR test, only one person, after they claim that, what is it, five or six dozen have got bird flu, which they identify as pink eye.
Pink eye is now bird flu.
Bird eye, we should call it.
Bird's eye.
Frozen food.
But she says, well, it's going to be 10% of these attacks are going to be suicide bombers.
And we know they're going to use airplanes.
Because the CIA has been talking about doing this kind of stuff since the 1960s.
That's what Operation Northwoods was.
And we look at 9-11.
She's out there pushing all this stuff.
Notice how she ties it in to October the 7th style attacks.
And because what they want to use this for...
Is to maneuver us into a war with Iran.
Don't be fooled again.
Come on.
We've been lied into one war after the other by the CIA. Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Remember that?
Gina Haspel, who, coincidentally, Trump made his CIA director for all four years, effectively.
The first two years, she was supposedly under Pompeo.
I think she was running the whole show.
Then he moves on to his next plum job at the State Department, and she continues to run it.
The CIA has lied us into one war after the other as they commit false flag attacks against us.
So understand what's going to happen with this.
The LifeSite News talks about why the radical Zionism of Trump and Musk should concern us all.
Trump has been nominating.
And surrounding himself with people who are almost all pro-Zionist, some of them extremely so, the most notable of whom have been pointed out by LifeSite News many times.
I've got links to it.
The drawing development appears to be the litmus test for anyone who wants a top cabinet position or any other influential position in his administration.
Yeah, we've got a couple of litmus tests.
First of all, you need to jump on and be 100%.
For surveillance of the American people, in violation of the Constitution, in violation even of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
And then, of course, you need to be fully on board with anything that the political leadership of Israel wants to do.
No questions asked.
This should deeply concern the American people, says LifeSite News, especially after the horrors that have occurred in Gaza and elsewhere following the Hamas invasion last year.
It gives the impression that Israel first has become Trump's main focus.
Yeah, and you know, when somebody is attacked, even if it is something of a false flag, even if you, like with Pearl Harbor, even if you know that it's coming and you don't do anything to defend against it, it's still on those people, and you're justified in terms of defending yourself against that.
But the other part of a just war...
Is that you stop when the threat stops.
In the same way that if somebody invades your house, you are entitled to stand your ground and defend yourself by any means of violence possible, even including taking their life.
But if they're not coming after you, if they're running away, if they've got your prized possession under their arm, you're not allowed to shoot them in the back.
These are the same moral principles that should guide nations, not just individuals.
And so the dozens of people that are being killed each day still in Gaza when there is no threat coming from there.
It's about something else.
And many of those people, children.
We won't know the answer about what is going to happen there until Trump is sworn in.
But there's signals that he is going to give them carte blanche to do whatever they want and that we will go to war for them in Iran.
And I think that's what this CI stuff is leading up to.
Israel is consumed with efforts to lure the U.S. into joining it in a dangerous war against Iran that would be a lot more dangerous for American troops than the Netanyahu-provoked war against Iraq.
It will almost certainly lead to a much wider war, possibly, as many of us have been quoting and warning, an Armageddon nuclear war between the great powers if this gets out of control.
The more extreme messianic religious Zionists and their settlers whom Netanyahu has allied with and given much more influence to keep himself out of jail and has welcomed such a war as a necessary path to accelerate the coming of their earthly Messiah after they have built the third temple.
And that would include many Christians as well, unfortunately, who have replaced Jesus with Israel in their worship.
Bernie Sanders went on with Jon Stewart talking about how AIPAC controls Congress and not the voters.
But, you know, we have had Trump talk about this many times.
I mean, this is not something that's just Bernie Sanders and Jon Stewart, both of whom are Jewish, by the way, obviously, right?
But Trump has said this as well.
Well, you know, the biggest change I've seen in Congress is Israel literally owned Congress.
You understand that 10 years ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful.
It was so powerful.
And today it's almost the opposite.
You have between AOC and Omar and these people that hate Israel.
They hate it with a passion.
They're controlling Congress.
And Israel is not a force in Congress anymore.
I mean, it's amazing.
I've never seen such a change.
And we're not talking about over a very long period of time.
But I think you know exactly what I'm saying.
They had such power, Israel had such power, and rightfully, over Congress, and now it doesn't.
It's incredible, actually.
Yeah, they control Congress, and rightfully so, he said.
I remember when he said that, I remember playing that over and over again.
It's like, so when is it right for a foreign country to control Congress?
Never.
Unless you're Israel first.
Which is what Trump—he's not America first.
He's not a populist.
He's a globalist.
This guy is completely different than what he pretends to be.
So Bernie Sanders and John Stewart Senators, who privately oppose Israel's brutal war in Gaza, will vote to advance Israel's interest over the will of their constituents because they know that AIPAC will destroy their political careers if they do otherwise, according to Bernie Sanders.
In an interview last month that is only just now going viral, Sanders told Jon Stewart that fear of having one's political career destroyed by the Israeli lobby is, quote, the root of everything, unquote, when it comes to the will of the public not being reflected by our representatives, only to catch himself and to walk it back a little.
He said, I introduced legislation that would stop arms sales to Netanyahu.
We got 19 votes, which observers thought was very significant.
So the American people do not believe that we should be supporting a government that is starving children right now as we speak.
But if you stand up, you're going to find that AIPAC and other billionaire-funded super PACs are going to go to war against you, putting huge amounts of money in a primary in your general election.
So it's not a question of not understanding, he said.
There are many members of the Senate who will come to you privately and say, what Netanyahu is doing is outrageous.
I can't vote because money is going to come and destroy my political career.
So you've got to get to the root of everything.
He says, well, not of everything, but a key part of this whole discussion.
That's where he walked it back.
It really is the root of everything.
Thomas Massey, who has been the target of this, told Tucker Carlson that every member of Congress, Senate and House member, has got an AIPAC babysitter.
To ensure that you vote in the interests of Israel at all times.
And he says this is the only country that does this.
He says they ought to have to register as foreign agents under the Farah Act.
And he's the only one that's got the guts to say that.
And that's why they spent $300,000 in his race to try to shut him down.
But fortunately he won by a large margin.
Because the people there understand what's going on.
But they continue to dump money in to smear him.
Meanwhile, we have Steve Bannon taking on Elon Musk, calling him an evil guy.
I thought, well, finally, Bannon and I agree on something here.
Except not for the same reasons.
So he vows to stop Elon Musk's influence over Trump.
Hey, Steve, Trump's for sale.
Have you noticed that?
Have you noticed that's simply about money and power?
You didn't notice that?
Really?
Bannon said that Elon Musk is a, quote, truly evil guy, and he vowed to, quote, take this guy down, he said in an interview.
Look, he's just a rabble rouser who's trying to get attention.
He's no different from Alex.
It's just, he's a truly, so what is it that he thinks is evil?
About Elon Musk.
Is it the brain-computer interface that he's pushing?
Is it the crony corruption and the crony capitalism of how he became the king of crony capitalism?
That was what the LA Times talked about.
First time I interviewed Eric Peters, it was about that.
We were talking about Elon Musk.
That was about a decade ago.
As a matter of fact, he's going to be our guest tomorrow, right, is he?
Yeah, I think we've got him scheduled.
Not Elon Musk, but Eric Peters, yeah.
That would be an interesting one if I had Elon Musk on.
But we could talk about video games.
As a matter of fact, Whistler told me, you know, this whole thing about the video games.
First it was Brian Shulhavi says, okay, something's going on.
This guy's not really playing the video games or he's not really running the companies because you can't do both.
So he's basically a fraud.
The Wall Street Journal is saying the same thing and they've got some investors who are worried that maybe he's just kicking back and smoking dope and taking ketamine for his depression.
The world's richest man is so depressed he's got to take drugs.
And so they looked at him and said, was he doing these games and everything?
Whistler said, Well, they actually found that it's another guy.
He's paying some guy to log in under his name so that he can look like he's a champion gamer as well.
Which, fine.
The guy's making a good living playing games, I guess.
So, whatever.
Just for bragging rights for Elon Musk.
But, you know, what is it that makes him evil to Steve Bannon?
Is it because he's playing this video game?
No, no.
Is it because of the brain-computer interface?
Well, no.
Steve Bannon doesn't seem to have a problem with that.
Doesn't have a problem with the crony capitalism and the crony corruption.
Steve Bannon doesn't seem to have a problem with Elon Musk's transhumanism.
He and Peter Thiel have pushed the singularity.
As a matter of fact, Peter Thiel has given, I think he was one of the founders of the singularity event.
I forget what it's called.
They have an annual event.
I was going to see if Alex would fund me going to see it, but he didn't want to do that kind of stuff.
I wanted to set in on the Singularity Conference one year, but he didn't want to do that.
Anyway, is it Elon Musk's global governance and the fact that he's cozy with the Chinese communists?
Not about that either.
What about the universal basic income that was so important?
No, that doesn't make him evil in the sight of Steve Bannon either.
What about, again, that vision, the singularity?
He says, we're going to have to merge with computers, or they'll kill us all.
So we've all got to become cyborgs.
We've got to merge with a machine.
Is that the evil?
No.
No, that's not it.
None of that.
No, the thing that makes him this evil guy that has to be taken down.
It's the H-1B visas.
That's what does it for Steve Bannon.
The H-1B visa.
But Bannon and MAGA and all the rest of it, they don't have a problem with all this transhumanist, satanic stuff.
They don't have a problem with that at all.
They don't have a problem with Elon Musk dressing up in his Baphomet costume and his upside-down cross, his anti-Christ cross.
That's not a problem with these people.
Bannon made the comments in an ongoing dispute over the H-1B visas.
He said he should go back to South Africa.
Well, I would tell Elon Musk you need to go back to your master, Lucifer.
You know, the one that you signed your soul over to.
That Faustian bargain.
I always want to call it now a Faucian bargain because I've been calling it that for so long.
You've got to be wary of people like Bannon.
Just like you've got to be wary of Elon Musk, and for many of the same reasons, because for both of them, everything is about money, and it's about power.
And that's all they care about.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Says, has anybody checked the price of natural gas lately?
All energy prices are on the rise right now, including crude oil.
I don't know.
Yeah, maybe that is an anticipation of this war in the Middle East.
Yeah, we look at it.
Interesting that even as they sell us net zero and say, you're not going to be allowed to burn any of that stuff.
Everybody is in a mad rush to acquire it.
And we have wars over the gas pipelines.
You know, we've got to blow up the Nord Stream pipeline from Russia into Europe, and we've got to blow up the other pipeline that's going across Syria.
I mean, that's what these wars are ultimately about.
It's about energy.
Still about energy, isn't it?
And they're going to war with us over the energy that we use, aren't they?
He kill us, is the username, saying to timed non-tides, no one would have locked down for Hillary.
Nobody would have taken the shots for Hillary.
Nobody would have closed their businesses for Hillary.
But they'll do it for MAGA. That's right.
That's absolutely right.
That's why you've got to do it left, right, left, right.
Milton Milankovic says, Quebec health care is so bad that they go to Ontario for anything even remotely complicated.
Wow.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's amazing.
And see, that's the problem.
You know, government health care is the big version of public health.
And we've seen how bad public health is, like public schools.
Wright Overture says, finding a good doctor is a bit like finding a good politician.
Arito says they are hiring psychopaths for leadership positions in government, police, and military.
That's the only people that will carry out those evil orders.
Yeah, that's absolutely right.
As a matter of fact, even, you know, when I interviewed...
John Kiriakou, who was the whistleblower about the CIA torture, and they sent him to prison.
That's what he said.
He said, well, they're looking for sociopaths in the CIA, people who get right up to the line of psychopaths, but hopefully they don't go over.
But he said, yeah, a lot of them do.
It's like, yeah, we noticed, I think.
Karen B. says, for any society to function and to prosper, it's absolutely fundamental to the means of exchange.
Be issued free of debt and interest by the legal authority of the state as representatives of the people.
And that's why they put that in the Constitution about coining gold and silver.
Angry Tiger says the Constitution is a dilapidated document that has been ignored.
It's also been cut up into pieces and burned.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work anymore.
Our country has been compromised for quite some time, and it's not just the Israel lobby.
When you're hyper-focused on one group, you're missing the whole picture.
I agree.
I agree.
There's a lot of different groups and a lot of different interests, and we're not in that club.
They have completely destroyed all of that.
2025, let's take a look at some of the money stuff.
2025 will be the year of AI, DeFi, stablecoins, and regulatory progress in crypto.
And Bitcoin could break $200,000 by August.
There's an article from Ernest Hoffman at Kitco.
Well, what is he talking about with AI and DeFi?
DeFi is decentralized finance.
Just think of it, and I do, as the PPP version of CBDC, public-private partnership.
And we see this is already functioning in many ways, just like we were talking about January 6th earlier.
You know, you've got a lot of different companies that are profiling you and reporting, but it's going to be more proactive about that.
DeFi is kind of like a de facto CBDC. And when they realized that everybody was on to them about CBDC, when it got associated with the Chinese social credit scores and got a really bad rap, they said, well, we're not going to call it that.
We're not going to do that.
We're going to do it in a different way.
And this is what we're talking about here, I think.
The decentralized finance and what you're going to see with the Bitcoin and big tech people that are around Trump, they will come in.
With a version of this that'll make them very rich, and it won't have the in-your-face label that the Democrats would do it with.
That's why I say the Republicans are a lot more dangerous, really, than the Democrats.
The Democrats would just come in with a big sign and scream at you, call you racist and tell you you gotta lock everything down.
You know, we're gonna ban this, we're gonna ban that, we're gonna do that.
The Trump administration, what I expect they'll do is they'll say, look it, we're all for choice.
And you can do anything that you want to with energy.
It's just that you're going to pay my pals here some carbon taxes.
And you're going to pay my pals to do carbon capture and carbon sequestration.
But, you know, you'll be free to do whatever you want.
It's just an economic tax that we will apply to you.
So what is the crypto outlook?
Well, you should look at the functionality and not at the label.
CBDC, by any other name.
It's still going to have the same issues.
So you have to look at the functionality of what they're doing.
Does it destroy our privacy?
Is it a way of tracking and surveilling everything that we do?
That should be the metric that you should be worried about.
But of course, there's also the irresponsible indebtedness that's there.
Bitcoin in January in a slump?
Well, this person here at Cointelegraph says that's nothing new.
Following years where Bitcoin does a halving, they said, you know, and of course it might be worse with the Trump euphoria over Bitcoin and crypto and all the rest of this stuff.
But he says a major Bitcoin correction in the first month of a year after the blockchain sees a halving is historically not unusual, according to analysts who have compared previous cycles.
Bitcoin dumping in January has historically been a common occurrence in these years.
And this is a person, crypto analyst, that goes by the name Axel Bitblaze.
Have you ever noticed how these people have got aliases?
All of these people.
He's got 123,000 followers on X, they said, in this article.
So you must know what he's talking about.
I can talk about whatever I want to talk about.
Nobody will see it on X. I've got 138,000 followers, and I've been stuck there for the last eight years.
Anyway, followers have pretty much been frozen.
But his followers actually see what he posts, even though he's got 123,000.
He said, we all know what happened after the 2017 and the 2021 dumps.
So far, Bitcoin has lost 10% this month, and a fall from its high of 102,000 on January 7th to just below 92,000 before recovering slightly to now hover around 94,000.
In January of 2021, the next most recent post-halving year, Bitcoin fell more than 25% from over $40,000 to just above $30,000 by the end of the month.
And then it skyrocketed 130% to a new all-time high of $69,000 by November of that year.
In January 2017, The year after the halving in 2016, Bitcoin slumped 30%, falling from $1,100 to $784.
That was in 2017. Then it surged 2,400% that year, culminating in what was then an all-time high of $20,000 by December.
Meanwhile, YouTuber and analyst CryptoRover, again, another guy like Axel Bitblaze, You want to put your life savings bet on advice from people who don't want to use their real name?
So CryptoRover observed that Bitcoin has consistently dropped in the first half of the month for the past year.
So, you know, again, we don't know who these people are, but it says Bitcoin has not reached the ultimate hype and pump phase.
And that was another analyst.
This one going by the name of Stock Money Lizards.
There you go.
I have this on good authority.
QAnon is going to be, the next one is going to be predicting what's going to happen with Bitcoin, isn't it?
It says, with mass adoption and pro-crypto governments worldwide and ETFs, etc., I think it underlines our hypothesis.
They see things like ETFs as a good thing.
None of these things, I think, personally, are good.
A 130% move similar to that in the peak year of the previous cycle could send Bitcoin prices from current levels to over $200,000 before the end of 2025. On the flip side, a pullback of the magnitude seen in January of the last two cycles could send prices below $70,000.
So look, who knows, right?
Who knows?
The other thing that's...
Involved here is not just what usually happens at the beginning of the year, or not what usually happens in January after Bitcoin has gone through its halving.
I guess that's what you say, halving.
Anyway, it's not about any of that kind of stuff, even, necessarily.
It's also about the expectations of what Trump's going to do, regardless of what he does or doesn't do.
Markets get themselves worked up into expectations.
Just go back and take a look at the dot-com bust that happened.
Now, there was a lot of speculation that was into things like Pet.com and things like that.
You know, some people put money on Amazon.
But even the companies that made the picks and the axes of the Internet gold rush, okay, the people like, you know, Cisco or even Intel and others, you know, who were making real stuff that was going to be used and the Internet was a real thing and it was going to be big and everything, even they took a bath in all this stuff.
You know, when the market goes down and you get caught because you've got to take some money out, it's just like what happened in real estate.
You've got to get your money out, you've got to move, you've got to do this, you take a bath and all that kind of stuff.
You get upside down, you're underwater with these things.
And so the concern about all this stuff is that nobody really knows what's going to happen.
Not even these anonymous people like stock money lizards.
Anything could happen.
And this whole thing of Trump is another wild card that's going in.
But Tony's going to be on tomorrow, and he's going to talk about a way that you can go from gold to gambling.
If you want to do that, you can do it without fees.
But he's got something that's unique that's going to let people, if they want to invest some money into Bitcoin, let them do that, or go vice versa.
Go from Bitcoin into gold one way or the other.
So he's going to be talking about that tomorrow when he joins us.
No, it's not tomorrow.
It's Thursday.
Yeah, I don't know what day of the week it is.
Meanwhile, the clash of the titans weighing gold and silver.
This is from Epoch Times.
Gold and silver, as investments, have both stood tall against high inflation and other periods of economic uncertainty.
Do you think we're headed for economic uncertainty?
I do.
When it comes to weathering financial storms, gold has shined in the darkest markets.
So while the other people are making a case that, you know, we've seen this cyclical thing going on with Bitcoin.
It drops down, then it explodes towards the end of the year.
He points out, during the recession of 1980-82, the S&P 500 index plunged 27%, while gold increased by 46%.
Fast forward to the dot-com crash of 2000-2002.
Gold rose 12%, while the S&P 500 dipped 49%.
And again, when we look at the dot-com crash, to me it looks very much like AI. It isn't about whether or not something is going to be real or not, right?
But it's about whether or not people's expectations get ahead of the reality.
People's expectations got ahead of the reality with the dot-com.
Even to the extent, as I pointed out, you've got companies like Cisco and Intel and others that took a bath as well as Pet.com.
So people's expectations get hyped up, and the stock market has been hyped up over the last year predominantly with AI and predominantly with NVIDIA. And so who knows what's going to happen?
Again, the stock market is very unpredictable because of the erratic behavior of humans.
And because that has been magnified by the reactions of computer trading.
You know, it magnifies and intensifies those human reactions to things.
And so, who knows what's going to happen with this stuff.
And it's a great deal of uncertainty that is coming up.
During the Great Recession of 2008-2009, the average annual percent change in the producer price index for gold rose 12.8%.
It rose 27.4% in 2010 and 32.8% in 2011. While silver has also seen monumental highs during tough times, it may not perform as consistently as gold, he says.
During the 1980 recession, The price of silver reached a record high of about $49 per ounce, but during the Great Recession, silver prices swung from a high of around $16 an ounce in 2007 to a low of $8 per ounce in 2008. The spot gold price has dropped this year to around $26.30,
they said, but now it's at $26.83 this morning, for its record high of $27.90 per troy ounce in October 2020. And so the question is, real assets versus the dollar?
This is from Kitco.
They said, And that's something that these central banks have in common with gold bugs and with Bitcoiners, right?
They all agree that fiat is perhaps the worst investment of all.
So the question is going to be, what is Trump going to do?
Is he going to have a, as I say, a reserve shift?
Is he going to shift the reserve into Bitcoin as he promised?
A lot of the expectations were based upon that.
Biden tried to do the best that he could to dump.
The money that the Department of Justice had stolen from people and make sure that could be used as the start of a reserve.
So we'll have to see what is happening with it.
But even Zero Hedge says it's still a very gold-friendly world.
Gold's remarkable few years may have more to go as government profligacy raises structural inflation risks and increases the likelihood that sovereigns are tempted to switch the proverbial printing presses back on.
Central banks have been a pivotal driver of gold's recent rally as stubborn inflation and the weaponization of the dollar against those who incur America's displeasure.
It all encourages diversification away from the dollar.
The metal is overbought, however, and could face a correction in the near term.
So again, nobody knows.
Don't know with any certainty what's going to happen with these two things.
Just look at the long-term issues and what we have seen in the past.
We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
That's right, boys and girls.
There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense.
Go to davidknight.gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn.
He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
Wahoo! Yark!
Fiat! Fiat! Fiat! Fiat! Fiat! Fiat! Fiat! Fiat!
Thank you.
A couple of comments here.
Three Little Birds says we're already seeing new methods of war, such as directed energy weapons, drones, and mostly the information wars.
I agree.
And we're talking about the information war.
That's a key part of why they're so manic about artificial intelligence.
That's going to be huge.
The ability to analyze us.
They've been collecting this data for quite some time.
It's all there.
For them to be able to analyze us individually and collectively, they can go through and they can immediately find out what the reaction of the public is to their narrative or whatever MacGuffin they're trying to scare us with.
They can immediately find that out.
They can see if people are buying into it or not.
That's one of the reasons why they moved away from CBDC so quickly.
They could look at social media and they could see how adamant people were about stopping that and see that they had been exposed.
So they pivot to something else.
They can pivot to a new narrative.
They can pivot to a new tactic.
That's the power that it has.
And, of course, they can do that with us individually as well.
John A. Gospel Seed says, People reacting in chaos are easily controlled.
Take the fires now or the bioweapon that we had before.
More is coming as the inauguration starts up.
I agree.
Yeah, that's the key thing.
Fear not.
I can look and see how many times that's mentioned in the Bible.
You know, that's a constant theme.
Fear not.
You don't need to be afraid of that stuff.
You go to Pilgrim's Progress.
The whole idea, you know, that's one spot.
He's trying to go into, in his path.
There's a couple of lions that are there.
They're going to devour me if I go that way.
And as he...
Summents up the courage to go through it.
He finds out that these lions are on a chain.
Boy, if that isn't a metaphor for what our life is like.
Constantly see these lions, but we don't realize that God's got them on a chain.
That's the way you ought to proceed with this stuff.
Johnny Gospel Seed, I just did that one.
Don't frag me, bro.
Said, the battlefield is the human mind more than anything else.
Absolutely is.
We don't wrestle with flesh and blood.
But it is with the lies that they tell us.
Wright Overture says 1865 was the end of states' rights.
I like to talk about it as states' powers.
And I say that because I think labels matter a great deal.
And when we talk about rights, that is something that is endowed.
We created, however, the states, just as the corporations have been created.
So, corporations have privileges.
States have powers.
And that's the way they talked about it in the Constitution.
They said the powers that are not delegated specifically to the federal government are retained by the individual states.
There were powers that were retained.
Sovereignty that was retained by the states and by the people.
So the people had powers, and the people had rights, but the states had powers.
But nevertheless, I agree with the fact the North punished the South for their uprising.
Now the same people are moving here, and about as welcome as fleas on your favorite hound dog.
I would take the position that it was North that did a rebellion.
It was Lincoln who rebelled against the Constitution.
It was Lincoln who called for 75,000 troops to invade the South.
And it was Lincoln who called it an insurrection when people stood for their right of self-governance.
Look, the whole Declaration of Independence was about the fact that if you've got grievances with another, you know, political bonds should not be lightly dissolved.
But there are times when it should be dissolved.
If you cannot agree on the direction that you're going to go, then people should be able to peacefully go their own way.
Or they have the right to fight their way out, if necessary.
And that was what the Revolutionary War was about.
That was what the founding of America was about.
That's what the Declaration of Independence was about.
Lincoln, on the other hand, brought us a centralized government.
It used to be the United States are, and then became the United States is.
And what he did was antithetical to the Constitution.
Three Little Birds says to He Kill Us.
Today, people aren't fully aware of the war against them and are ignorant participants in their own demise.
And Naburo 2029 says the founders of the U.S. Constitution were the aristocracy of that era.
Not much has changed in 250 years.
And as Wright Overture says, true, but it was the church that had the greatest influence on our Constitution and our rights.
I agree.
And the thing...
It was because of the influence of the church, because of the influence, I would say, not just of the church, but just of the influence of Christ, not even Christianity.
The influence of Christ on the American people meant that the American Revolution was one of the few revolutions where they didn't try to grab as much power as they could after the revolution was over.
Look at every other revolution.
What did they do?
They wanted to take everything.
They argue that they're having a revolution in order to empower the people, but then they take all the power from the people.
That was not the case then, because it was a country that was organized along the principles that Jesus gave us.
Let's talk about this Mel Gibson appearance with Joe Rogan.
And one of the things that they talked about was cancer.
I'll tell you a good story.
Okay.
I have three friends.
All three of them had stage 4 cancer.
All three of them don't have cancer right now at all.
And they had some serious stuff going on.
And what did they take?
I can't say.
They took some...
what you've heard they've taken.
Ivermectin?
Fembendazole?
Fembendazole, yeah.
Yeah, I'm hearing that a lot.
They drank hydrochloride something or other.
There's studies on that now where people have proven that they've...
People drinking methylene blue and stuff like that.
Yeah, methylene blue, which was a fabric dye.
Yeah.
Yeah, it was a textile dye.
Now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria.
Yep.
Yeah.
This stuff works, man.
There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange because, again, it's profit.
We're only supposed to buy it from big pharma.
When you hear things that are demonized and that turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here?
How has our medical institutions, how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable?
That they can't control it.
They don't have a patent on it, whether it's vitamin D, K2, and magnesium, zinc and quercetin.
I do all that stuff.
Yeah, again.
Well, you know, I'm glad they talked about it.
And to his credit, Joe Rogan was the one that dropped the things that must not be named.
Ivermectin, fenbendazole, or whatever.
I'm not familiar with fenbendazole.
A little bit with ivermectin.
A lot of people have taken it.
And as we pointed out, it's got a very long history.
People know some of the side effects.
Some stuff has surfaced that ivermectin is perhaps...
Deleterious to fertility, the ability to have children, and some other things like that.
We don't know.
Again, the problem with these is that you don't know what the side effects are, but of course you don't know what the side effects are of the pharmaceutical drugs either, do you?
Because they lie to you about it and they hide it.
Oh, it's rare, right?
It's rare.
Well, it's rare that they do anything that's in your favor, but it is sad that we live in a time where people are afraid to say, And I guess that was the thing that really struck me about that interview, really disturbed me.
The good news is I've got three friends that had stage 4 cancer, and they all got rid of it.
Oh, what did they take?
I can't tell you, you know, that type of thing.
You know, that was the key thing.
Rod Dreyer, when he wrote his book, Live Not By Lies, of course, that was based on an essay by Soli Nitsen.
You know, he says, we can't fear these people.
We can't fear telling the truth.
And even if you're afraid, don't lie to yourself about that kind of stuff.
Look, you know, that's not the way I'm going to live my life.
I don't care what happens.
I'm not going to back off, especially if it's something I think saves somebody's life.
You know, that's why I wanted to talk to G. Edward Griffin.
I didn't really want to talk to him so much about, you know, The beast from Jekyll Island or whatever, the Federal Reserve.
Yeah, that's something to talk to him about.
That's what he's famous for.
But far more important is the fact that G. Edward Griffin was not afraid to tell people when he saw something that cured people of cancer.
I mean, if we're going to be silent about something that people are dying from in such large numbers, what is the matter with our society?
What is the matter with our government?
And if the government...
And society is going to punish us for that, then that government and society needs to be confronted directly over that.
And so, you know, the story that G. Edward Griffin told when he was on with me, he wrote the book, A World Without Cancer.
Why did he write that book?
Because he had a physician who came to him and said, all right, I had this situation, and I forget how the physician got into it, but...
There's apricot seeds that he gave to somebody who—oh, no, he gave some apricot seeds.
And I don't know why he did it with his dog, but his dog had cancer.
The dog got better.
And he had somebody that worked for him in the office, and her husband got cancer.
And so she pleaded with him, you know, help me with this stuff and everything.
And so they did.
She got better.
And the word started getting around.
All these people were coming to him about these apricot seeds, about vitamin B17. And I forget why he did that in the first time, but it was an anecdotal thing.
But he said, I want people to know, but like Mel Gibson, he was afraid to say it because he was a doctor and he knew that they were going to take his license if he talked about B-17, apricot seeds, laetrile, whatever you want to call it.
And so he went to Jared Griffin because he knew Jared Griffin wasn't afraid.
And he wrote the book.
And he's not afraid to say it.
Then or now.
That has been very effective and cured a lot of cancer cases.
And it will never be investigated because of money and because they have no profit.
They can't patent apricot seeds.
And it's a food.
And so that's one of the things that makes it difficult for the FDA to come after people.
But they will come after you if you tell them that it cures cancer.
But it has.
And so that's why when you look at what RNCstores.com.
I interviewed them as well.
His father.
They came after his father for that stuff as well.
But he's doing it.
He's got books that you can read as well as you can get it in a pill form if you don't like the bitter apricot seeds.
By the way, you can get 10% off if you go to RNCstores.com and tell them night.
And so, in this article here from Exposé News, they're saying, Gibson dropped the bombshell, revealing that three of his friends had stage 4 cancer, and all three of them don't have cancer now at all.
And they go into this in some more detail.
They said, Dr. William Mankus, who treated one of Gibson's friends, came out after that and posted that on X. He said, yeah, one of those three people I treated.
He has rigorously researched the anti-cancer potential of ivermectin and fenbendazole over the past two years.
During that time, Dr. Amakis discovered, quote, there are over 100 papers on the success of ivermectin in cancer.
He says ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells, he explained.
It targets the cells that chemo can't kill, and it can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to certain types of chemotherapy.
He says it also makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well.
So he said it is a kind of radiosensitizer.
Makes it more sensitive to being destroyed by radiation.
Well, I don't know what the mechanism is for B17 or apricot seeds.
I just know that there's a lot of anecdotal evidence, as they say.
But I prefer anecdotal evidence to studies that lie, which is what we get from the pharmaceutical industry.
And, you know, when you look at it, I'm just putting this information out there for you to investigate it and look into it yourself.
You know, when I look at pharmaceutical drugs, even something like ivermectin and fenbendazole, I'm concerned because it is fundamentally a pharmaceutical.
I'm looking all the time, I'm looking more and more at natural things, like apricot seeds.
And if somebody's taking apricot seeds, the only side effect is it that tastes bad?
But as some people who take it on a regular basis say, they get used to it.
But if that's the only side effect, I can live with that.
Dr. Makis said, we must insist on having ivermectin, fenbendazole, and mebendazole made available over-the-counter to every American.
Well, I think what we have to insist on is the general principle.
That we should have the freedom to choose whatever we wish and not be punished by the FDA or be punished by some politicized idiot like the New York State Attorney General.
What is her name?
She came after Alex for the silver stuff.
Look, silver is a very effective antibiotic.
They use it in burn units, and there's nothing to be afraid of with that.
Letitia James.
What?
An abomination that woman is.
And everybody's upset with her over Trump.
I'm upset with her because she threatened people during all this COVID stuff about silver.
And silver is very effective in terms of a lot of different things.
But you should insist on your freedom to choose.
Your freedom to choose the food that you eat, the drugs that you take, and that's the problem with the FDA. The FDA is about destroying our freedom on both of those areas.
Many people have said in the past, let food be your medicine.
Well, that's what the FDA is there about.
They're there to corrupt our food and to prohibit medication.
So do your own research.
As I said before, don't ask your doctor.
Be your doctor.
I did that with the cardiologist that wanted to put me on statins.
I said, I'm not going to get on statins.
Oh, you've been looking, you've been asking Dr. Google?
And I didn't say it to him, because I knew I wasn't going to come back.
Well, I have a fight with him over this stuff.
I'm just going to walk away.
But I walked out, and I said to Karen, I said, well, one of us has to be concerned about my health, and it's not going to be him.
So, yeah, I will ask Dr. Google.
And I'll ask Dr. Bing, and I'll ask Dr. Chat AI, or Chat GPT, or any source.
I'll ask any of them, and then I'll check it out.
So, after Dr. Makis, Put this out.
And if I remember correctly, I've interviewed him, I believe.
And if it's the guy I'm thinking of, he's an oncologist.
Yeah.
He's an oncologist there in Canada.
An American biologist, chemist, biochemist, neuroscientist, and medical doctor, Andrew Zywekic.
If I'm pronouncing his name correctly, I have no idea.
He responded to the tweet, and he said, I treated a patient.
With a fenbendazole and ivermectin protocol, among additional therapies, after reviewing the work of Dr. Makis and others, stage 4 prostate cancer metastasized into the lumbar spine.
And after he treated him with those things, he said it was gone in six months.
Gone in six months.
A Twitter user said he didn't believe Dr. Zweig.
And he asked for peer-reviewed studies to support his claims.
And so the doctor obliged.
And he provided some studies for the challenger to consider.
As a matter of fact, he gave him seven studies.
And he said, here is enough literature on bendazole drugs and ivermectin for you to review.
He said, don't message me for at least seven days.
Otherwise, I will know that you didn't read or review any of it.
So I gave him seven studies.
And it's kind of interesting when you look at these seven studies.
I just looked at the dates of the studies.
I didn't read them.
But these are studies that had one in 2016, one in 2017, one in 2018. There were two of them in 2021 and one in 2024. And when you look at these, and then they said to which we would add another study, an eighth one that was about breast cancer.
These other ones, just looking at them real quickly, one of them was breast cancer and melanoma.
Another one was, this is prostate cancer in another one of the studies.
Another one was about colon cancer and so forth.
Squamous cell cancer and so forth.
So there's been a lot of things like this.
They said Dr. Makis publishes articles on a Substack page.
The Substack page is called COVID Intel.
His articles are behind a paywall.
However, at the beginning of an article last year, he published a table summarizing dosages and reports of success stories using ivermectin to treat cancer.
And I reported on that as well when he did that.
Let's move to fluoride.
Six lawsuits were filed yesterday accusing toothpaste manufacturers, manufacturers of children's toothpaste, accusing them of violating federal law because of fluoride.
Now, the thing that surprised me was not that you have Procter& Gamble brands like Crest and Colgate, but that Tom's of Maine was in there.
And we used to get Tom's of Maine, it specifically said.
No fluoride.
But maybe they have some non-fluoride Tom's toothpaste, and maybe they've got a kid's toothpaste that does have fluoride, because a kid's toothpaste does have fluoride in it.
So Tom's of Maine, Firefly, and Hello, also in addition to Crest and Colgate, that they deceptively market their products which contain fluoride as, quote, extra safe for children.
According to six class action lawsuits that were filed in California and Illinois, accusing major dental products manufacturers of deceptively marketing products containing fluoride to young children.
You know, when you look at the standard toothpaste stuff that has fluoride in it, it says if you ingest any of this stuff, if you swallow any of it, call poison control.
And we've talked about that for the longest time in terms of, well, yeah, of course fluoride is not good for you.
The issue is dosage, right?
How do you control the dosage?
If you dump it into the water.
If it's something that in the small quantities that you're going to get in toothpaste, if you swallow it, you should call poison control.
And they've got that label on there.
They know it's poison.
So why are the dentists pushing it on you?
According to the complaints, the plaintiffs were misled by the product marketing, and as a result, they didn't follow public health guidelines when using the products, especially for children.
Because if you put all kinds of candy-flavored sweet stuff in it, fruit flavors and things, the kids are going to be tempted to eat it.
The CDC, the American Dental Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and others recommend that children under age three should use no more than a smear of fluoride toothpaste.
And that children between the ages of three and six...
Should use no more than a pea-sized amount.
So, wait a minute.
You mean dosage is important?
Well, of course it is with anything, right?
You've had situations, and I talk about this every time I talk about fluoride and fluoride in the water.
I said, you know, we've had situations where people have died from drinking too much water over a short period of time.
One of them, notably, was a joke contest that was being done on live radio.
They had a lot of contestants, and, you know, they would have them do something they'd have to, And so dosage is important.
Dosage is important with water, and it's important with fluoride.
And it's important with the fluoride in the water.
And it's important with the fluoride in the toothpaste.
How do you control fluoride dosage when you dump it into the water?
You don't know how much somebody's going to be getting.
And what is the dosage that you should be dumping in for a child or for a male adult?
Are you going to get too little of it?
And it won't be effective.
If you get too much of it, you get an overdose.
And that's always a bad thing.
Whatever it is.
Two of the complaints allege that Procter& Gamble, the maker of Crest Kids and Colgate Palmolive, maker of Colgate, and Toms of Maine, that they understand that encouraging caregivers to use the safe recommended amount of toothpaste, quote, is bad for their bottom line, unquote, said the lawsuit.
As a result, they use, quote, misleading and aggressive tactics, says the lawsuit, to prompt parents to use far more than is safe.
A practice that researchers have linked to toothpaste overconsumption by children.
Both companies' packaging, as well as pictures on their website, show images of a toothbrush with a full strip of toothpaste, not a pea-sized amount or a smear.
It is 8 to 10 times more if you put a full strip on your toothbrush.
That's 8 to 10 times more than the recommended amount for a child under 3. Even the organizations that recommend that they have fluoride toothpaste, like the American Dental Association or the CDC. This is 8 to 10 times more than even they recommend.
and it is three to four times the recommended amount for a child that is ages three through six.
Colgate uses pictures of fruit with matching flavors and names like watermelon burst, which sounds like a candy product or a juice drink, and it's a common signal to children that toothpaste is intended to be consumed as if it were food, they say.
Colgate Kids natural product marketed as silly strawberry by Toms of Maine also features the word natural, implying that the product is free from toxic ingredients, which it isn't, and that there is no need to limit how much sugar, Toothpaste goes on to the brush.
Maybe it's kind of like these corporations telling the kids, hey, it's just sugar water.
It's fine.
You can take it, you know, like the vaccine that Alex was telling everybody about.
Alex Jones.
It's just sugar water.
And then we've got some, you know, aluminum and mercury thrown in.
But that's not a problem.
After he told people for 20 years that that would give people autism when he was telling them the truth and getting their trust.
The CDC reports that 35% of children frequently eat toothpaste.
An additional 22% have tried eating it.
Some children under the age of 6 swallow substantial amounts of mouth rinse.
And that's one of the reasons why they say call poison control if you swallow this stuff.
Since the introduction of candy-like fluoride products in the 1980s, The rate of dental fluorosis among U.S. schoolchildren has skyrocketed.
That's when you get too much fluoride, it discolors your teeth.
It amazes me, you know, why the dentists are so, why they've dug in their heels on this issue of fluoride.
It just makes no sense to me.
I don't know where they're getting paid to do this.
Because the science doesn't make any sense.
Rates rose from 23% of children in 1986 to 87 to a staggering 68% of children with fluorosis by 2015 and 16. Ingesting too much fluoride can cause acute toxicity with flu-like symptoms such as nausea, stomach upset, and vomiting, symptoms that parents may not recognize as being related to fluoride.
They might think it's bird flu or something, right?
Put it in your eye, probably give you pink eye, I guess.
I don't know.
Probably turn your eye red, that's for sure.
They also allege that a third of a tube of kids' fluoride toothpaste contains enough fluoride to kill a toddler.
Wow.
Each year, poison control receives between 10,000 and 15,000 calls due to excess consumption of fluoride toothpaste, most of which involves young children.
Well, that brings us to RFK Jr. and how Trump is using him for political purposes.
It's going to be interesting to see what happens again this week.
We're going to have all these confirmation hearings for 13 cabinet members and things like that.
As people talk to Trump about RFK Jr. and about vaccines, you're going to hear Trump pivot away.
From vaccines, first of all, he becomes a big vaccine salesperson, as always.
But he pivots away from it to pesticides.
And then he comes back to vaccines and how wonderful they are, you know, because polio, that type of thing.
On vaccines, do you want RFK Jr. to revoke any vaccines?
No, I want him to come back with a report as to what he thinks.
We're going to find out a lot.
We're doing two things.
We're going to have tremendous cost savings that will come out of this.
That's a minimum.
And we're also going to have, and I think, very serious discussions about certain things, whether it's pesticides.
You know, Europe doesn't use pesticides.
And yet they have a better mortality rate than we do.
They don't use pesticides.
In fact, they use it as an excuse not to take our farm product.
We spend billions and billions of dollars on pesticides.
And something bad's happening.
Again, you take a look at autism today versus 20, 25 years ago, it's like not even believable.
So we're going to have reports.
No, nothing's going to happen very quickly.
I think you're going to find that Bobby is a very rational guy.
I found him to be very rational.
You're not going to lose the polio vaccine.
That's not going to happen.
I saw what happened with the polio.
I have friends that were very much affected by that.
I have friends from many years ago, and they have, obviously, they're still in not such good shape.
This is a guy who tells you you've got to get the measles vaccine, too.
And the moment they took that vaccine, it ended.
Dr. Jonas Salk did a great job.
So I don't anticipate that at all.
Yeah, you should go back and look at some of the other things that these guys talked about with the polio vaccine.
Why is the autism rate so much higher than it was 20, 25, 30 years ago?
I mean, it's like, it's a hundred times higher.
There's something wrong, and we're going to try finding that.
We're also going to find out why are we paying more than other countries?
And we were in the process of doing that through transparency and other things.
We were doing a good job in that first term, and we brought it down.
We got the $35, all of the different things.
We were the ones that got all of that done.
Every one of those things, we got them done.
I said, you know, I hope I win because...
Otherwise, somebody's going to take a lot of credit for what we did.
But now what happens is we're going to have a big conversation on price.
Why is it that Germany and UK and other countries are paying so much more for the same box of medicine made in the same plant?
Why is it that we're paying...
Many times.
Because about politicians like you.
Our government didn't do what they were supposed to do.
And what I put in place was terminated unexpectedly by the Biden administration.
And they shouldn't have terminated it.
Yeah, right.
Okay.
So you get the idea.
We've heard all this stuff before.
Why does it cost us so much?
And why did we give tens of billions of dollars to Pfizer?
Because they gave a million dollars to Trump.
That's why.
It's just that simple.
So we'll see what happens with this.
Audi.
Modern Retro Radio.
Good to see you there.
He says, many people don't realize the Bill of Rights was a result of concerns regarding government overreach.
That's right.
It is all about prohibitions on government.
You know, the Bill of Rights, as Obama correctly pointed out, he said, yeah, I used to teach constitutional law to somebody.
Somewhere, whatever.
And he said, we have positive rights, we have negative rights.
He says, I don't like the Bill of Rights because it's negative.
It prohibits the government from doing certain things.
It's like, that's right.
Because the real rights are the things that come from God, and the Bill of Rights is prohibition on government in terms of interfering with those God-given rights.
Because I like positive rights.
You know, things like the right to this and the right to that to be given to you.
That's not a right.
So they, again, they subvert the meaning of the word right.
But, yeah, James Madison looked at the Constitution and said, this is very worrying.
I can see here where people might use something like, you know, the Commerce Clause as it's being abused today or this or that.
And so that's why they had the Bill of Rights.
Except they just ignore the Bill of Rights and they go back to these initial flaws and say, well, we've got the General Welfare Clause.
That means we can do anything we want to and call it support of the welfare of the people.
We've got a Commerce Clause.
It was supposed to stop the interference of commerce by one state interfering with the commerce of another state when it's crossing state lines.
They turned around and tried to use that to justify drug prohibition when that was always there.
And they understood that they needed a separate amendment, an 18th Amendment to prohibit alcohol, and a 21st Amendment to overturn that.
It wasn't people who had respect for the Constitution at that point in time, and they don't have it now.
Reverend Bill 1960, look into the connection between vitamin D and cancer.
Yeah, I'm not sure.
I'll look into it.
High Boost, dentists push fluoride just like in your human conditioning video that you showed yesterday, David.
That could be the case.
Yeah, where they hear everybody else doing it.
And they go along with the crowd.
The video that we showed yesterday, there's a young woman who was the test subject, and they had probably about 10 or 12 people that were in the room with her.
And when the bell rings, they all stand up.
She looks around.
The next time, after a couple of times, she's standing up every time.
And then one by one, they keep doing this.
And one by one, they're taking people out.
And then everybody's gone, and it's just her.
And she still does it.
And then they start bringing in people who don't know anything about this.
And because she's doing it, the other guy does it.
And then they bring in several people, and they all are doing it, all at the same time.
That might be why the dentists are doing it.
Zogslave says, fluoride is industrial waste, one of many of our foods and water.
Cheaper to feed us industrial waste than to dispose it.
And you're absolutely right.
When they started doing that, It's industrial waste from a byproduct from the production of aluminum as well as the nuclear industry.
And it is a type of fluoride.
That type of fluoride is actually an industrial waste.
It's actually used in China as rat poison.
And they would have to pay a lot of money to dispose of it.
Instead, what they did was they convinced local governments by doing this nonsense to the dentists and things like that.
They convinced them that it was something that was healthy and got them to pay for it rather than having to pay to dispose of this toxic waste themselves.
Shadowboxer.
People who work in hot places take in far more fluoride because they have to stay hydrated.
Again, if you're going to medicate people through the water supply, that's a non-starter right there.
That's absolute nonsense.
Soylent Goy says, a dentist told me that cooking and showering in fluoridated water eventually runs through your system and protects your teeth.
Well, speaking of showering, you know, if you've got heavily chlorinated water, you can breathe in the chlorine if you don't filter that out on your shower head.
Matthew Ronson says it's used as rat poison.
That's right.
And he says, in numerous studies, iodine supplementation has been found to significantly increase urinary detoxification of both fluoride and bromide.
That's right.
And we need to do that.
Whistler is still having issues, and we'd appreciate your prayers.
And that's a fluoride-based thing.
Fluorochloroquine, you know, Cipro and all its derivatives, that's also...
Just fluoride is not something that you need to be taking for anything.
And, of course, one of the reasons that they use it as an antibiotic is because antibiotics are to kill living things.
That's what it means, the very definition of it.
You know, bio and biotic means a living thing.
And if it's going to kill the...
If you attack the fundamental basis of life of the bacteria, guess what?
It does the same thing to you.
Be very careful of antibiotics.
We're looking more and more into things like honey and garlic and other things like that.
Grammy for God.
Please do this section as a clip, David.
A lady I know was just diagnosed with cancer at 35 years old.
I want to send it to her.
I will.
I will.
I don't care.
I said Pfizer and vaccine people were killing people and knowing it.
I got punished for that, but I don't care.
Well, thanks for listening.
Have a good day.
Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But...
He told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
▲
Export Selection