Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 8, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:06

Wed 8Jan25 What is Trump Up to with Greenland, Panama, Canada & "Gulf of America"?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In
	a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday the 8th of January, year of our Lord 2025.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at All of Trump's talk about Greenland.
	And of course, Junior went to Greenland along with Charlie Kirk.
	They're serious about this stuff.
	And we're going to look at what their designs are.
	And what is really behind this.
	Of course, it's also Panama.
	And it's the Gulf of Mexico that he wants to rename the Gulf of Trump.
	I mean, America, right?
	That's what this is.
	No, there's a lot going on here.
	And we're going to take a look also.
	At the ramping up of fear, we got a replacement of Fauci.
	And she dropped something on New Year's Eve about bird flu.
	We're going to take a look at that as well as some new adverse effects of the vaccine.
	We're going to take a look at tokenization and how they're going to try, I think, to eviscerate the last of the small businesses.
	They've got a plan on how they're going to do that.
	These vulture capitalists.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, I joked around Christmas time when Trump first started talking about this.
	It was just before Christmas.
	Yeah, we want Greenland, and we want this, and we want that.
	I said, well, you know, he's got a couple of things that he wants for Christmas.
	He wants those two countries, and some other things.
	And of course, NORAD is up in Greenland.
	That's where they get the first glimpse of Santa Claus.
	And the MAGA Santa Claus is going to make America great again by taking all these different countries and many people.
	Are pointing out that he's very serious about this.
	Not just Greenland, where Junior is, but also Panama.
	And Greenland, they might have a way to peacefully take that over.
	I don't know so much about Panama.
	We've done an invasion there once before for not a good reason.
	And we'll talk about what's going on with that.
	But, you know, he does say things that are pretty crazy from time to time.
	He was asked about pardons for January the 6th people.
	And listen to what he has to say.
	Is he bringing in Hezbollah into January the 6th now?
	You said on your first day of office, you're going to pardon January 6th defendants.
	Are you planning to pardon those who were charged with violent offenses?
	Well, we're looking at it, and we have other people in there.
	And as you see, I guess 24 or 28 people came now from the FBI. That came out very quietly.
	Nobody reported it, but they had people in some form related to the FBI. They had four or five people that were strongly related to the FBI. We have to find out about that.
	We have to find out about Hezbollah.
	We have to find out about who exactly was in that whole thing, because people that did some bad things were not prosecuted.
	You know, I see it all the time, and you see it too.
	People that were doing some bad things weren't prosecuted, and people that didn't even walk into the building are in jail right now.
	So we'll be looking at the whole thing, but I'll be making major pardons.
	Yes, please.
	Yeah, they're in jail because you didn't pardon them.
	They're in jail because you told them to come.
	They're in jail because you said, meet me over at the Capitol.
	And then you got out of there.
	And then you left them twisting in the wind because you didn't want them to come after you.
	He's not between them and anybody else.
	But that whole thing about Hezbollah, where did that come in?
	At first you think, well, in his awkward way of speaking, is he...
	Transitioning over to some other topic?
	Yeah, we gotta look about Hezbollah and all that.
	No, he goes back to it.
	He puts Hezbollah right in the center.
	I don't know what he's talking about there.
	And a lot of people are guessing about what he's up to when he talks about Canada and he talks about Greenland and other things.
	And so Twitter is covered.
	Last night when I looked and posted some stuff, all I saw was stuff about the North American Union.
	As many people pointed out, you go back to the 1960s.
	The Club of Rome, the Committee of 300, the group was organized in 1968. And the purpose was to accelerate the plans to have a new world order, a global governance.
	And part of that was to create these 10 different zones that you see here and see numbered.
	And zone number one was, wait for it, the U.S., Canada, and Greenland.
	So what is he talking about?
	A lot of people pointing out, is this guy just a new world order puppet?
	I mean, that's what he drew on his map.
	He drew Area 1 of the New World Order.
	Is this just a coincidence?
	You know, I've talked many times about Brzezinski's plans for doing this.
	And I talked about it in the context of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Transatlantic Partnership, right?
	And he already had a consolidation of the European Union.
	And people like Zbigniew Brzezinski, who ran the Carter administration and who created the Trilateral Commission, and the trilateral aspect of it was they were going to have basically three large areas in the world.
	That was in the 1970s, early 1970s.
	They liked that so much they put him in charge of the Carter White House.
	And in that scenario, you had a unified Europe.
	You had a more or less unified Asia under China.
	And you had a North American aspect, and with America and the North American Union, as you see there.
	Essentially being the, you know, these other two things would be two wings, if you want to think of it.
	And the U.S. would be the body that these two wings are attached.
	So you create these other two regions, and then you attach Europe.
	We attach Asia to the U.S. via the Trans-Pacific Partnership and that type of thing.
	But there's a lot of different ways that they have looked at this.
	And, of course, that was my primary perspective because of what they tried to do with these treaties and because that was kind of the culmination of 50 years of work that was there.
	But, yeah, that is another aspect of this.
	One person tweeted out, this is...
	Truth Seeker on Twitter.
	So the reason Trump wants to purchase Greenland and the reason that we want Candidate to merge with the U.S. is because he was put in place as a useful, willing puppet to usher in the new world order.
	Well, I think that's true one way or the other.
	We say that in many ways, as a matter of fact.
	But you've got people out there who say, this is genius.
	This is absolute genius.
	And here's one MAGA nut talking about what he imagines Trump is truly up to.
	Hey guys, I am going to try to explain something, but I'm kind of frustrated because it is so fantastic.
	It is so beautiful.
	It is so phenomenal that I'm struggling to find the right words for it.
	So I'm just asking you to please listen, because this is going to make you so incredibly excited.
	This is going to make you so enormously excited.
	Isn't it amazing?
	I'm excited already.
	As I try to explain something extremely, extremely powerful to you.
	It's going to blow your mind, really.
	Oh, it's a big build-up here.
	Can't tell you enough.
	He is going to bring Canada into America.
	The moment I heard that...
	I was like, oh my god.
	What that means is so astronomical.
	Oh, yes.
	Then, listen.
	Then he wishes Happy New Year to Australia.
	Oh, them too.
	I had to go to the hardware store and buy a whole bunch of new fuses because they couldn't bear the load of fire that was going through them.
	And now Trudeau has resigned.
	I mean...
	If I was a cartoon figure, my hat would just blow off.
	You know?
	And today...
	No.
	Two days ago, Trump said...
	He showed a video clip of dancing people waving flags in England.
	And he said, the people in the UK know what's going on.
	They were celebrating.
	Why?
	And then today, Elon Musk posted, America will liberate the United Kingdom from the tyranny.
	Guys, what this means, and I hope that you can bear with me for a few minutes because I need to explain something that will give you so much hope and joy and excitement and courage for the future.
	Now, I'll give you the...
	a little bit of build-up.
	I just got it right there.
	This guy goes on for seven minutes.
	He gets the ideas.
	Excuse me.
	Very low information transfer.
	Now, what he's saying is, the heart of evil, the heart of the New World Order, is the UK. And that Trump's move in terms of the fact that he's going to bring, he's going to take Canada away from the UK. I thought they were already kind of independent.
	But anyway, they have some of their ties, as we see with Mark Carney when I talked about that.
	He was governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England because they have these ties.
	They're largely ceremonial, really, but it does allow they are connected at the financial level, which is probably the most important.
	Nevertheless, you know, oh, he's talking about Australia.
	He's talking about Canada.
	He's going to wrest them from The evil UK. And look, I'm not saying that the City of London and Prince Charles and all the rest, I'm not saying that they're not evil.
	It's just one of many different groups that are out there.
	But you get the idea.
	Yeah, no problem at all.
	and um as far as the canada stuff uh goes uh that is really kind of um uh off the wall which mean you know a lot of people say well maybe he's not serious about greenland stuff and i think he's very serious about that i think he's very serious about panama And I think he's going to start calling, you know, he can call that body of water anything he wants.
	If he doesn't want to call it the Gulf of Mexico, he can call it the Gulf of America, or he can call it the...
	The Gulf of Trump, if he wants.
	And who knows whether he'll do that or not.
	RT said Trump demands Denmark hand over Greenland.
	And they said you ought to take him seriously with this.
	Trump has said he would not rule out military or economic steps to retake control of the Panama Canal or to acquire the Danish-controlled territory of Greenland.
	And again, when we look at what's going on with...
	Denmark, they've backed off like the UK has backed off in many different areas.
	There still are connections there.
	But, you know, Greenland does have its own prime minister.
	And they've gone through a couple of steps of distancing themselves from Denmark.
	And we've got military bases there already.
	A lot of people say, well, we can have it for national security.
	I'll give you the history of our national security there in Greenland.
	It's not anything that we need to have Greenland be a part of the United States for national security.
	So I think there's other things.
	Oil, minerals, other things like that.
	More so, I think, than even the strategic location.
	Because we've had bases that have been there, and we'll talk about what is there.
	Asked during a press conference at Mar-a-Lago on Tuesday, yesterday, if Trump could assure the world that he would not use military economic coercion.
	Trump said he would not.
	No, I can't assure you on either of those two, but I can say this.
	We need them for economic security.
	And again, that would indicate oil, minerals, other things like that.
	And again, that doesn't mean that we need to take Greenland.
	They would be open to oil exploration.
	They are open to that.
	They're open to investment.
	China is investing there.
	I think that's what it really has to do with.
	They've got a gross domestic product of $2 billion.
	They have 56,000 people.
	Now, the gross domestic product of $2 billion is because of minerals and other things that are like that.
	Because a population of 56,000 people, that's like a small town here in Tennessee.
	And it's spread over the largest island in the world.
	Covered in ice, Iceland is green.
	You know, they're very different and all that.
	It's a massive piece of ice there, but there's a lot of ice-covered land, but there's a lot of minerals that are there as well.
	People really don't know, said Trump, if Denmark has any legal right to it.
	But if they do, they should give it up, because we need it.
	Bullying, blustering, I just, is that the way, the good way to do foreign policy?
	I don't think that's a good way to do any policy, quite frankly.
	The MAGA people love that.
	They cheer that.
	I don't like that.
	You know, you had Teddy Roosevelt said, walk softly and carry a big stick.
	He shouts at people, but he's also got a big stick.
	And that's a good way to...
	Have the whole world see you as a bully.
	He says we need it.
	He says it's absolutely necessary.
	So his son arrived yesterday.
	He went there with Charlie Kirk.
	He didn't meet with the Prime Minister of 56,000 people.
	This is like the mouse who roared, if you remember that Peter Sellers movie.
	The Grand Poop of Greenland.
	And I'm not saying, you know, I'm not trying to put them down.
	If I've got any listeners in Greenland, or even if I don't have any listeners in Greenland, I'm all about small things and decentralized things.
	It just amazes me that people there would say, oh yeah, I would like to be a part of America.
	Don't they listen to the news?
	I obviously don't have any listeners there in Greenland if they want to be a part of America.
	How about we let Greenland join America and we let Tennessee go?
	Or Texas.
	Or any one state that we could all move to here.
	I cannot for the life of me understand it.
	Unless, you know, they want the money or something that they think they're going to get.
	Anyway, Trump Jr. takes a personal day trip, as he called it.
	He didn't meet with any government officials.
	And then Sauron Musk.
	I think I'm going to start calling him that.
	Instead of Elon, I think Sauron is a more appropriate description of the guy.
	Sauron Musk also appears supportive of the plan.
	Posting on X, he believes that the people of Greenland, quote, want to be a part of America.
	And they'd be most welcome.
	Evidently, there's no retarded people there.
	You know, as he likes to say Americans are, right?
	These people are top echelon H-1B visa candidates there.
	All right, for Elon Musk, maybe he thinks he can get them cheap.
	Anyway, Danish Prime Minister reiterated on Tuesday that Greenland is, quote, not for sale and never will be.
	Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders, she said.
	Greenland is the world's largest island, already home to a very large U.S. military base.
	So what do we need it for national security?
	We got bases there.
	I mean, we don't.
	Bases all over Germany.
	We don't need to have Germany.
	Join the United States.
	We don't need to control them, right?
	It's not about that.
	It's not about that.
	It's located on the shortest route from North America to Europe.
	Gained home rule from Denmark back in 1979. 46 years ago.
	So Trump has previously promised to regain control of the Panama Canal, which he calls vital.
	The late President Jimmy Carter signed it over to Panama in 1977. Initially, when I heard him start talking about Panama, taking the canal back.
	Although, maybe this is just about him trolling Democrats and Jimmy Carter, right?
	Because certainly Biden trolled him by saying, we're going to keep the flags at half mass for 30 days throughout your inauguration.
	In December, Panama's president promised that, quote, every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area Belong to Panama and will continue to be so.
	And on Tuesday, Trump promised to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.
	Because he said it has a beautiful ring and it is appropriate.
	That covers a lot of territory.
	The Gulf of America.
	What a beautiful name.
	As a matter of fact, there he is.
	Changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, which has a beautiful ring that covers a lot of territory.
	The Gulf of America, what a beautiful name.
	And it's appropriate.
	It's appropriate.
	Alien Poop Evolution says, wow, Trump should unite the whole world under these ten regions.
	It would be so biblical.
	Yeah, the Ten Kings, right?
	Well, we're moving there, aren't we?
	Well, again, Trump said, would you support Canada becoming the 51st U.S. state?
	He put this out as a poll.
	And Roy Potter says, well, when you, Donald Trump, Brought this up.
	I posted on X how this is.
	And then, how is this?
	And then adding Mexico.
	How is this any different from General Petraeus claiming that the U.S. and the Constitution are dead and the future is the North American Union?
	Yeah, exactly right.
	As a matter of fact, I skipped the comment, which is one of the reasons why I wanted to have this here, of that MAGA nut that was there.
	I saw that David Icke replied to that.
	That guy who was saying, oh, this is so wonderful.
	It's so beautiful.
	This is a war with Trump against the evil British Empire.
	David Icke said, this guy is so unbelievably deluded that Alex Jones should get him on his show immediately.
	Let's talk about that.
	He's going to save the world.
	Trump wants Canada to become part of the U.S. in order to save them from the globalists.
	Nothing to do.
	With the so-long planned North American Union.
	That's right, as I said.
	It's all over the place.
	And it is insane.
	I mean, you know, you look at this, and he loves to troll people.
	Mark Hall, who I talked to, and I've got a couple of clips from him.
	He knows a great deal about Panama.
	He stays there several months out of the year.
	Has a very long history.
	Knows the area really, really well.
	And, you know, he says, this is sounding like John Bolton or something.
	It's really crazy.
	But it is all based on ego.
	And look, he's not going to rule out military force to take a country away from people.
	I've said before and I'll say it again.
	I have nothing but contempt and scorn for people who will kill in order to move lines on a map.
	It's no different than if somebody goes around, you want to talk about home invasions, right?
	We've got squatters come in and move into your home.
	There's a clip that's going around on social media in Florida.
	Squatting is not legal.
	And so they had a bunch of people taken out by police, guns drawn, and shoving them around, very forcefully taking them out and arresting them, handcuffing them.
	But yeah, we all understand that home invasions are wrong, right?
	The squatting is wrong.
	How is that different?
	Well, it's a much bigger scale, isn't it?
	And you don't just take over the home when somebody's not there or the country's not there.
	You go and you start killing people.
	So RT said, here's why Trump's talk of annexing Canada and Greenland shouldn't be dismissed.
	Trump and his team of America's bluntest and briskest can look funny.
	Their demands are so bracingly direct.
	Their threats so refreshingly frank.
	It's almost as if they're mightily enjoying themselves as they rub in the fact of brute American power.
	And I think that's a big part of it for Trump, quite frankly.
	Yeah, I got this now.
	Yeah, I am America.
	And a part of this is just his hubris and his celebration, his lust for power.
	I tell you, when you look at the character of Donald Trump, we talk about the three things, right?
	The pride of life, the lust of the flesh, and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's sex, money, and power.
	Basically what it boils down to.
	And Trump is all about consuming.
	Massive quantities of all three.
	He can't get enough of any of those three.
	He checks all the boxes, doesn't he?
	And that's what's going on here.
	They rub in the fact of America's brute power.
	We, the U.S., are the best-armed, richest mobster family in town, and the new Don is greedier than Scarface and crasser than Tony Soprano.
	That pretty much sums it up.
	This guy is a history professor working in Germany, from Germany, rather, working in Istanbul, who wrote this article for RT. You can see Trump from the other side of the planet.
	He's got an ego that big.
	You need to buy more overpriced LNG, liquid natural gas from us, or we'll wreck your economy even more.
	And Canada, just get with a program, any program really, or we'll recall that we'd like that land bridge to Alaska.
	Sort of the shape of your state, excuse me, country, haha.
	Panama, remember, we own you, and everything you think you own is ours too.
	Or we'll drop in and literally with the 82nd Airborne and AC-130 gunships to remind you yet again.
	Because I had George H.W. Bush do that, right?
	When his partner in crime, his partner in the drug crimes, as well as many people allege other crimes, that maybe that was, a lot of people said, maybe it's not even the drug partnership that went bad, maybe...
	Bush went down there to retrieve some Jeffrey Epstein kind of videos that were compromising.
	But either way, they suddenly turned on his former ally, just like he turned on his former ally, Saddam Hussein.
	And I remember a documentary that we had in the video stores after this happened.
	I remember it was narrated by Elizabeth Montgomery.
	It was called The Panama Deception.
	And in it, they showed pictures in that documentary that I've never seen on U.S. news.
	Pictures of cars that were melted and, you know, individual cars that were melted.
	It's the first time anybody was talking about directed energy weapons and things like that.
	But they also had a lot of eyewitnesses saying that as well.
	And then the most chilling aspect of it was that they said before the attack, the U.S. came in with these loud speakers.
	And I said, get out of the area.
	We're going to destroy this area.
	Get out of the area.
	And it's like, where's the sound coming from?
	What area are they talking about?
	Which area are they going to attack?
	And they said, that was the worst thing about it.
	They're telling us that they're going to attack the area.
	Get out of it.
	They don't tell us what area is going to be attacked or where to go to be safe.
	But, you know, they warned them.
	That's it.
	So it's been done once before.
	They called it Operation Just Cause.
	And this guy says, we might do it again.
	We might call it Operation Just Because.
	And I thought that was funny because that's the way I referred to it when I talked about the Panama invasion.
	What was it?
	40-something years ago, you know?
	No, let's see.
	It would have been 90s.
	It was 30-something years ago.
	I don't even remember the date.
	Denmark, listen up.
	You think Greenland is yours?
	We can do better.
	It's really ours.
	And the only question is whether we do this the nice way or the hard way.
	Look, understand.
	And this guy writing this article for RT said he's fundamentally a real estate guy.
	He's not going to take no for an answer.
	He just sees that as a bargaining tactic.
	And, of course, if you look at what broke him up with his best friend, Jeffrey Epstein, the two of them inseparable for about a decade.
	But the thing that broke them up was the dispute.
	Over who was going to buy a choice piece of property there in West Palm Beach.
	It's about that kind of stuff.
	So there's no permanent friends.
	There's only permanent real estate interests, to paraphrase Henry Kissinger.
	Note that all these objects of Trump's bullying are officially allies of Washington.
	Remember that old lesson?
	It's safer to be a respected adversary than a disrespected friend.
	Yeah.
	If the U.S. were a country that had to argue its case, no one would even pay any attention.
	Canada is a sovereign country.
	The preponderant majority of its 40 million people have no interest in joining the U.S. as the 51st state, period.
	But the whiny complaints that Trump and his team have made about bad treatment at the Panama Canal don't withstand scrutiny.
	As the by no means unpatriotic Wall Street Journal has detailed in a podcast, no, the U.S. is not being ripped off at the Panama Canal.
	No, American shippers are not treated worse than others or being price gouged.
	No, the U.S. is not currently paying for the maintenance of the waterway.
	Instead, after completion of the canal handover in 1999 or 2000, That has been the task of the Canal Authority, which is, in essence, a business structure.
	The Chinese do not have soldiers in the Canal Zone, as Trump has claimed.
	And in general, his screams of China, China are as hyperbolic as always.
	Well, as I said before, Mark Hall contacted me because he's very familiar with Panama.
	Spends several months out of the year down there.
	And this is what he posted up on Facebook.
	He says to anyone who heard Trump's press conference today, no, the Panama Canal is not operated by China.
	No, China does not own or control ports on either end of the canal.
	No, U.S. warships are not charged more to transit the canal.
	No, the Panama Canal is not leaking.
	No, the canal does not need $3 billion for maintenance.
	No, the canal was not sold for $1 but transferred almost 50 years ago by a treaty.
	Approved by the U.S. Senate.
	Do you remember when we used to have treaties that were approved by the U.S. Senate?
	That quaint idea from the Constitution?
	We don't do that anymore.
	The statements said today are false.
	And Mark put this stuff out.
	He took a screenshot of this, but he put this out before the Wall Street Journal article came out.
	Because he's seen it firsthand.
	You know, I can disagree with the Wall Street Journal from time to time, and I've seen them toe the line from time to time.
	I know Mark's telling the truth.
	He's been down there.
	I know him personally.
	The statements said today are false.
	If Trump has evidence to the contrary, I'd like to see it.
	What's the end result Trump is seeking with his repeated belligerent remarks about Panama?
	The U.S. has ignored Panama and Latin America for decades, and in that vacuum, China moved in, commercially for now.
	However, it does not operate or control the canal.
	That is capably done by the Panama Canal Authority.
	a panamanian government organization and then later he made a reference to to the wall street journal but he also responded to a newsmax reporter schmidt out of new york city he said the report that he put out there basically newsmax is going to parrot whatever trump says he says wrong
	the two panama ports mentioned on his news report are operated since 1996 by a hong kong-based hutchinson wampoa that is owned by victor lee and blackrock Not the People's Republic of China.
	BlackRock owns everything, don't they?
	Including the Panama Canal.
	So just ask them to turn over the title.
	You know, if you want Panama, just buy it from BlackRock, Trump.
	Larry Fink.
	The BRI port project with China was shut down.
	Panama is one of the U.S.'s few friends in Latin America.
	Don't make it an enemy.
	And he highlights information about Hutchinson-Wampanoa, a Hong Kong-based multinational conglomerate that operates container terminals in Panama through its subsidiary, the Panama Ports Company.
	And so what's that all about?
	Again, is it ego?
	Is it perception that he's got to compete with China there in Panama with their investments or compete with Greenland with their investments in Greenland?
	I'm not really sure at this point what the guy's up to.
	Again, he sounds like a deranged version of John Bolton, which is really super deranged.
	You start with a deranged guy and you make him even more deranged.
	He said the secure Panama Canal is crucial for U.S. commerce and rapid development of the Navy from the Atlantic all the way to the Pacific, Trump said.
	And he started talking about this before Christmas, December the 22nd.
	He said it was likewise not given to Panama to charge the U.S., its Navy, and its corporations doing business within our country exorbitant prices and rates of passage, which they do.
	And so, in response...
	This German historian who's living and writing in Istanbul said it would be unwise to dismiss the Trumpist no-charm-all-harm offensive as just a grab-bag of power moves to establish dominance and to produce leverage.
	A lot of ultimately empty noise to play for various political and trade advantage.
	He says that's a short-sighted interpretation.
	The case of Greenland is most instructive.
	But it's not enough to enumerate the legal rights and the illegal claims involved.
	All that is rather obvious.
	The U.S. wants to buy Greenland.
	And not for the first time, by the way.
	We'll get into that history about that.
	It says presidents from Jackson to Truman have had an eye on it as well.
	Denmark, however, said no, and not for the first time.
	In theory, that should be the end of the story.
	But it's not.
	And he points out, as a real estate tycoon, that's just the beginning of a bid when the other side says no.
	But it's not even that.
	I mean, when you go back and you look at Jeffrey Epstein and how that, you know, trafficking young girls and blackmailing people from Mossad, that's not a problem.
	But hey, he wants to buy that piece of property here in my neighborhood that I want for bragging rights.
	You've got to look at his personality, I think, plays a huge role in this.
	Unfortunately, his personality, which is not suited to running the country, he will be running the country.
	Greenland also features in sight and enticing raw material deposits.
	The EU has a special investment with Greenland's Minerals Resources Authority.
	Greenland has a special status with, Founded on the 2009 Greenland Self-Government Act, and it also has a very small population, as I said before, about 56,000 people.
	Maybe they could be induced.
	Maybe they could be bought, right?
	Trump and Don Jr. are playing good cop, bad cop right now.
	He's there, hey, aren't I cool?
	Look at my private jet.
	Look at how wealthy we are.
	We're rich Americans.
	Don't you want to be rich Americans, too?
	Maybe they could be induced by a mix of threats and incentives to fully secede from the Danish state.
	That is the idea paraded openly by former Trump advisor Alexander Gray.
	He says, let us help you gain your independence, and then you will lose it again to us.
	Like I said, who in the right mind wants to join the United States at this point in time?
	A dying empire.
	That's creating an army of 80,000 IRS agents, as well as budgeting seven times the amount of money that they previously had, because it's not going to just be the IRS agents, but it's also going to be artificial intelligence surveillance and analysis of people.
	That's just one aspect of the police surveillance state here in the United States.
	Well, as I said, Trump Jr. and Charlie Kirk go to Greenland.
	They said, this is a deal that must happen.
	A deal that must happen.
	Again, you know, when you look at Charlie Kirk, this guy, the way he, he's one of the key Trump grifters.
	One of many.
	But I think I have a special dislike of what Charlie Kirk does.
	Because...
	At the same time, he is pushing it.
	I've had friends that, oh, he's a great, strong Christian, all the rest of the stuff.
	I said, have you seen what he does with LGBT? I mean, Trump uses LGBT for political purposes.
	And people who understand what's going on with the LGBT agenda give him a pass on it.
	And they give Charlie Kirk a pass on it as well.
	That's bad enough.
	But what Charlie Kirk is trying to do is normalize it.
	For Christianity.
	Normalize it for Christianity.
	That's not Christianity at all.
	And that's why I have a special dislike of Charlie Kirk.
	Don Jr. and my reps landing in Greenland said to President, elect Trump, the reception has been great.
	They in the free world need safety, security, strength, and peace.
	This is a deal that he says as he talks about peace in all uppercase as he's threatening to invade Panama again.
	This is a deal that must happen.
	Then all uppercase, MAGA make Greenland great again.
	On Monday evening, Trump posted a video of a man from Greenland who, buy Greenland, buy Greenland, and he puts on a Make America red cap, you know, a MAGA red cap.
	When asked why Trump should buy Greenland, the man responded, because we don't want to be colonized by the Danish government anymore.
	I think they're going to find that the Danish government leaves them alone far more than the U.S. government ever will.
	We get ripped off every year about our minerals from Greenland.
	We are the richest nation in the world, and we don't get to use it.
	You think the U.S. will be any better?
	Take a look at what we do to our minerals and our oil and our natural gas and all the rest of this stuff, right?
	But they're putting this out as if this was some kind of manifest destiny.
	And during his New Year's speech, the Greenland Prime Minister emphasized his desire to pursue independence from Denmark.
	The former colonial ruler, again, like I said, since 2009, they've had the right to declare independence through a referendum.
	So all you need to do is convince 56,000 people.
	How hard could that be?
	You've got all this charm offensive.
	You've got Sauron Musk's money.
	Greenland is rich in mineral, oil, and natural gas resources, but it relies on annual subsidies from Denmark worth some 500 million euros a year.
	So Denmark's ripping them off, or Denmark is subsidizing them?
	Which is it?
	It's home to a large U.S. Air Force base.
	Greenland is strategically vital for the U.S. military.
	But the Prime Minister says, well, Greenland belongs to the people of Greenland.
	But if Greenland is rapidly moving toward a split with Denmark, it will likely be seeking a partner to offer security as well as new commercial opportunities.
	The BBC reported that he said we must not lose our long struggle for freedom.
	However, we must continue to be open to cooperation and trade with the whole world, especially with our neighbors.
	Responding to Trump's comments, he said last week, Greenland is not for sale, never will be.
	However, Isn't that what politicians always say as they're extending their hand?
	I'm not for sale.
	I'm not for sale at all.
	So, getting back into the history, since 1867, the U.S. has been making attempts to purchase the island of Greenland from Denmark.
	That continued into, escalated in World War I and World War II for strategic purposes.
	But during the polar expedition of Robert Perry, when he claimed a lot of Northern Territory, the U.S. decided, well, we're going to purchase the Danish West Indies during World War I. So Robert Perry's out there saying, well, I've discovered all this stuff, and I claim it for America.
	And so rather than getting into a fight with Denmark during World War I, the U.S. wanted...
	The Danish West Indies.
	And so, as a part of that deal, Denmark required the U.S. to recognize the Danish claim over Greenland.
	Since 1823, the U.S. has, in the Monroe Doctrine, opposed expansion of foreign sovereignty in the Americas.
	And this is Region 1. Come on, you know.
	Region 1 of the...
	The ten regions the Club of Rome is putting out there.
	During World War I, the U.S. decided that obtaining the Danish West Indies to defend the Panama Canal was more important.
	There you go.
	There's a connection.
	They want to be able to defend the Panama Canal.
	In the 1920s, General Billy Mitchell, advocating for the expanding American air forces, wanted American bases on Greenland and Iceland.
	And then during World War II, The German invasion of Denmark, April 9th, 1940, complicated the legal status of Greenland in World War II. Greenland was, at that time, the only known significant source of cryolite.
	Had to look that one up.
	They used that in aluminum smelting.
	Well, they needed to smelt a lot of aluminum.
	And so they wanted that particular mineral, so the Germans invaded Greenland.
	The U.S. said, well, we've got the Monroe Doctrine, but rather than forcing that issue, the troops that were sent to Greenland prior to their landing, the American troops were formally discharged from service and reconstituted as a force of volunteers.
	So they weren't officially part of the U.S. military.
	A legal fiction.
	What we would call sheep dipping today when it's done by the intelligence community.
	No, I'm not with them anymore.
	It's what they do to these former CIA people when they put them on network news or they put them on podcasts.
	No, I'm not with the CIA anymore.
	I officially resigned.
	Well, that's what they did with these soldiers.
	They send them to Greenland to avoid the charges of an American invasion of the country.
	And so, especially because the U.S. was being neutral at that point in time, the Danish government later agreed to the official entry of the U.S. Air Force into Greenland, and the U.S. Army occupied the island in 1941. So from 1959, the island was part of NORAD. Again, then after the, you know, during the Cold War and everything, it became another strategic issue.
	They had a very large military base there.
	The Thule, T-H-U-L-E, I guess it's Thule, maybe it's Thule, but I think it's probably Thule because it's probably German.
	Post-Cold War, the U.S. lost interest in the island, and they're concerned about that because there was a lot of employment that was there.
	And so they're trying to get people interested in climate research and a bunch of other nonsense like that.
	China, however, is interested.
	As part of their Arctic policy, the country in 2018, that was during the first Trump administration, and Trump didn't do anything about it.
	They declared itself a near-Arctic state.
	Greenland wants outside investment, and more delegations have visited China than the U.S. China is the largest outside investor, with $2 billion in investments from 2012-2017, Rather, accounting for nearly 12% of Greenland's gross domestic product.
	So you hear again, all roads lead to war with China.
	And every time you talk to one of these people from the military-industrial complex, it's like, well, how can this be used in our war against China?
	I interviewed the guy, I forget his name now, but I remember the book title, Four Battlefields.
	It was about four different battlefields that we have going on right now with China, militarily, for military supremacy.
	I interviewed him, even though he is a child of the deep state, if ever there was one, because I wanted to talk to him about the role of artificial intelligence.
	I looked at the book and I was interested in what the military was doing with artificial intelligence and autonomous stuff.
	But, you know, the gist of his book is all about China.
	And if you look at this manifesto that's been put out by the alleged bomber, that's also feeding a war with China.
	And when you look at this, and I had a long-term listener and supporter who said, well, I can't believe that you dismissed the anti-gravity machines so summarily.
	It's because I didn't find any credibility in anything else.
	I've said it for a long time.
	That we make big mistakes if we underestimate how evil these people are.
	And we make a big mistake if we underestimate their technology.
	And so, I would say that I wouldn't be surprised to find out that they've got anything.
	However...
	When it's thrown in with a cocktail of lies, when it's thrown in with an obvious end point objective of fear China, they're after us, they're going to do this to us.
	Look, he says it's checkmate, massive weapons of mass destruction and so forth.
	What do you think the hypersonic missiles are?
	I mean, are they trying to not only escalate...
	A war with China, but are they also trying to redirect us away from the reality that has been demonstrated by Putin in terms of hypersonic missiles for which we have no defense?
	We have no more defense against hypersonic missiles than we would against massive anti-gravity machines that have no payload limitations that they could park over the White House.
	You might as well.
	You know, it's no different.
	That is no different in terms of our vulnerability than the hypersonic missiles, and yet we ignore that.
	And we don't seek peace.
	Instead, we continue to escalate.
	We continue to probe and to push, even when they have a strategic advantage.
	I think, but nuclear warheads on those hypersonic missiles, there is absolutely no defense.
	Nothing is going to stop them.
	And so, it really doesn't make sense.
	To talk about the anti-gravity machines and that being a killer change in the imbalance between the U.S. and China and other superpowers if you don't look at the hypersonic missiles, which China has as well.
	We're the ones who have fallen behind.
	We're the ones who don't have the hypersonic missiles, but be afraid of anti-gravity machines.
	No, I don't find any of that stuff that they said credible.
	And as I said, it just reeked to me.
	Of the same kind of sham stuff that I saw happening at Infowars.
	Alex's family is in the CIA, and there's this constant trail of people coming in.
	Oh, they're on our side now.
	Oh, they were bad, but they're on our side now.
	And now they're going to tell you the truth.
	After lying, cheating, stealing, assassinating, and running coups, they're going to tell you the truth, and you can trust them now.
	And yet we've seen it time and time again, especially in 2020. These same people, they lined up every single one of them, and it's not just Steve Pachenik.
	I won't go in and start naming names because it gets everybody upset with me when I name the names.
	But it was a constant stream of these military experts that Alex had been talking to.
	Military intelligence and some other people just lying up one side and down the other on the COVID thing.
	The question is, were they ignorant?
	Were they taken in?
	Or were they pushing a lie?
	And some of them pushed the lie of Steve Buchenich.
	Folks, if somebody was naive enough to believe that, that is not somebody that you should have.
	Alex didn't believe that.
	But he kept pushing the lie.
	Why?
	Because the only thing that mattered to him was eyeballs.
	That's all that matters to him.
	He doesn't care about this country.
	He doesn't care about the truth.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
	It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes.
	The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
	Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	Song Song Song Song Song Song Song Song Song Song
	The End
	The End Welcome back.
	These comments are great here.
	Thank you for the tip as well.
	He says the Gulf of Mar-a-Lago.
	Well, that's on the other coast.
	I think the Gulf of Mar-a-Lago would be a good name for what was formerly known as the Atlantic Ocean.
	Because it's got to be bigger, right?
	Because it's associated with Mar-a-Lago.
	But yeah, rename the Atlantic the Gulf of Mar-a-Lago.
	He could rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of Trump.
	That would please him.
	Hal 9000 Watson says, Finnish are from Finland, are greenish from Greenland.
	I guess Trump could be the Grinch who stole Greenland, couldn't he?
	We all got to go green at some point or the other, right?
	How better to do it than in Greenland, which is covered with ice.
	And KWD68 says, can America be purchased?
	Usually any business or property that is deeply in debt is cheap, and they are buying us now.
	We've been bought and sold, they've leveraged us, and that's what the great taking is going to be about.
	It is about buying America.
	And of course, America and Trump are for sale.
	Just take a look at what Saron Musk did.
	We have some good news coming out of Florida, perhaps.
	You know, it was a couple of years ago that Ron DeSantis and his Surgeon General Lattapo said we're not going to recommend these vaccines to people.
	They weren't going to stop them, though.
	And he did not want to take the full responsibility to take on, I guess, the pharmaceutical companies by himself.
	So he wanted to get...
	A grand jury to investigate this stuff.
	I guess, you know, building up talking points for it.
	But now they're at the point where he is talking about the findings of these people.
	Ron DeSantis put this out on Twitter.
	He said this morning the 22nd statewide grand jury released its final report.
	This grand jury was tasked with investigating vaccine manufacturers and then their production processes for vaccines following the COVID pandemic.
	While we are still reading through the report and its recommendations, it details that through deception and taking advantage of scientific journal infrastructure to hide adverse events from the public, Big Pharma engaged in a pattern of deception and obfuscatory behavior.
	Big Pharma And this all happened under Trump, right?
	They continued under Biden, but this all happened under Trump.
	The grand jury also details the frustrations of many, stating, These sponsors have taken in billions of taxpayer dollars for creating and selling their vaccines.
	They cannot be sued if something goes wrong with them.
	They have access to critical information about deaths related to side effects of their products, and the public does not have access to that information.
	Those are all quotes from the grand jury.
	He goes on to say then, he said, the grand jury has made a number of recommendations that should be followed.
	The status quo cannot continue.
	The American people deserve transparency on how Big Pharma is using their federal tax dollars, and they deserve regulating entities that operate as watchdogs and not cheerleaders.
	Well, cheerleader was what not only...
	All the people in the Trump administration, including Trump himself.
	They're wonderful.
	They're great.
	I can't get my people.
	My people don't trust me.
	They don't trust me on this thing.
	Gotta get the shots.
	All the rest of this stuff.
	Talk about being advertisers.
	He paid the Ad Council $250 million to push these vaccines that were untested, and he knew it.
	They've never had an advertising campaign that big.
	They've had Smokey the Bear.
	They've had, you know, this is your brain on drugs as they drop eggs in the frying pan and all the rest.
	I mean, all these silly things that they hector us with and rip us off for.
	They've never had anything like that.
	And, of course, we've never had this kind of reaction to a vaccine.
	Listen to this.
	This is a teen, a 19-year-old woman.
	Whose breasts ballooned from B-cup to triple G. I've never even heard of that.
	After she got her COVID jabs.
	And people on social media are calling it a Pfizer boob job.
	But it's nothing to joke about.
	It was a booster.
	But this is fibrous mass.
	And this can go anywhere in your body.
	Typically, it accumulates in sexual organs of both male and female.
	It crosses a blood-brain barrier.
	Of course, it wreaks havoc in the circulatory system and with the heart and other things like this.
	But it is rare in the sense that it's located in her breasts.
	They said, called it a case of gigantomastia.
	Why do they have to come up with a Latin name for everything to sound impressive?
	Giant breasts, okay?
	That's crazy.
	Previously healthy with no notable medical history.
	And she experienced rapid breast enlargement just one week after receiving her first dose of the COVID vaccine in September of 2022. But unfortunately, she went back for another.
	And then when she got the second dose, her breast size increased very dramatically from a B cup to a triple G over six months.
	And so she had to win extensive medical evaluations.
	There were no hormonal abnormalities.
	There were no other causes that were identified.
	Doctors determined that the woman's symptoms aligned with something they call I'm not going to go into all the details of that.
	None of us know anything about it.
	It's a very rare condition.
	Involving idiopathic fibrous mammary tissue growth.
	I'd like to know if they biopsied this stuff.
	Is it like the white stuff that we see accumulating in people's veins that the coroners get out of their veins?
	Again, fibrous tissue growth.
	The association between PASH and vaccine administration has not been previously established, making this case particularly noteworthy.
	A medical journal said this case presents a healthy young woman with rapid bilateral breast enlargement one week following Pfizer vaccine administration.
	After ruling out other potential causes, she underwent bilateral reduction mammoplasty with histology, revealing dense terminal duct.
	Lobular units interspersed with PASH. So again, I should have some more information about what that stuff is.
	Her concerns were not adequately addressed by her primary care physician.
	No, really?
	I haven't ever heard of that before.
	Leading her to have mistrust in the healthcare system.
	Although a temporal relationship does not establish causality, Dismissing patients' concerns can erode trust.
	Isn't that convenient, you know?
	If something happens right after the vaccine, oh, it doesn't make anything.
	That doesn't mean anything.
	But if you wait a while and it doesn't happen for a few months or it doesn't happen for a year, oh, well, too much time has passed.
	They have it both ways.
	Either way, they just dismiss it.
	Here they say something like, it's rare.
	You know, well, this particular case, it is rare.
	Fewer than 20 documented cases of this.
	Again, it's progressed from a B cup to a triple G cup over six months right after the Pfizer vaccination.
	Now, something that is unfortunately not rare is yet another individual, another athlete, has died unexpectedly.
	A German club soccer team.
	Is left stunned by the unexpected sudden passing of a 22-year-old player who was very healthy.
	Except I imagine he was probably vaccinated in order to be able to participate.
	We've seen this over and over again.
	So, where are we going with this?
	Well, you know, we shouldn't worry because the people who are in charge of our government, Trump, you know, he's a vaccine skeptic, right?
	No.
	Biggest vaccine cheerleader you could possibly have.
	And actually, Elon Musk is heavily invested in the mRNA technology as well.
	Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated.
	Are you vaccinated?
	Yeah, I'm very pro-vaccination.
	The science is not critical.
	Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains?
	Plus, you're not going to be there in 10 years.
	Just think of sensors planted into our brains.
	Basically, you plant it in your skull.
	But it would be flush with your skull.
	So you basically take out a chunk of skull.
	Even he thinks it's insanely crazy.
	You first.
	You'd insert the electrode threads.
	Very carefully into the brain.
	It doesn't change what you are doing.
	It changes you if you take a genetic editing.
	It's a fusion of the physical, the digital, and the biological world.
	Really the essence of the fourth industrial revolution.
	A merger with biological intelligence and machine intelligence.
	An effort for man to merge with machine in a healthy way.
	Yes.
	To beat machines, you basically have to merge with machines.
	Most likely, yes.
	As work is changing, is a universal basic income really a solution to this problem?
	I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income.
	And I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary.
	Decarbonization of the economy.
	Where are they traveling?
	How are they traveling?
	What are they eating?
	What are they consuming on the platform?
	So, individual carbon footprint tracker.
	Stay tuned, we don't have it operational yet, but this is something that we're working on.
	I mean, my top recommendation honestly would be just to have a carbon tax.
	This global reset is necessary.
	Yep, that's what they're doing.
	Those are all clips.
	Elon Musk at the World Government Summit saying we need to have universal basic income, but of course he was the one who gave millions of dollars to Andrew Yang, who was running for president with one issue, universal basic income.
	He then branched it out after he got a million dollars to do other things, like have the federal government remove all zoning and other stuff, so they can put high-density housing in wherever they wish.
	And also destroy the whole framework of individual home ownership.
	But they're doing that pretty well in terms of a lot of different mechanisms.
	It's always interesting to hear Klaus Schwab talking about the forced industrial revolution.
	Is he talking about the number four?
	Or is he talking about forced?
	That's what it always sounds like to me.
	Well, it looks like they're ramping this stuff up again, and they're starting in China again, because that's where you can sell your lies so easily.
	They are reintroducing strict COVID rules as a mystery new Chinese virus spreads.
	Members of the public are advised to avoid public spaces, to wear masks in public, if they're showing symptoms of human metanomovirus.
	Yeah, they got a new virus that they've imagined.
	Have you isolated that virus yet?
	Yeah.
	Could you send me that TPS report?
	I'd really like to see that isolated virus.
	Over 200 people, labs, were contacted in country after country asking for the isolated virus.
	Nobody has it.
	And many of them said, we don't ever isolate viruses.
	Well, if you don't isolate them, how do you know all of this stuff, right?
	You're not just making it up, are you?
	HMPV, which exhibits symptoms similar to those of COVID-19.
	Which is also similar to a cold or flu, and it's wintertime.
	Remember all this stuff that was playing out five years ago in December of 2020?
	And then early 2021?
	It's kind of interesting that Joe Biden just reposted something that they had done, and they put out this announcement here, you know, January the 20th, 2021. January the 20th, as he's about to come, the time to move forward is now.
	And this is the video that they released then, but they just reposted it.
	They reposted it, and people are like, wait a minute, what are they doing?
	This was put out four years ago.
	Well, this is what they put out as he was about to take office.
	Time to heal.
	Yeah.
	The time to rebuild.
	The time to figure out what planet you're on, Joe.
	Time to unite.
	And everybody is putting on their mask as it says, time to participate, to achieve, to grow, to change.
	There's that Marxist fist.
	Time to learn, time to love, a time to recover, time to lead, time to engage.
	Are they trying to paraphrase Ecclesiastes?
	They've already had a big hit song with this stuff, but they're trying to pull it back.
	They just got all these different things.
	Innovate, Inspire.
	Inspire was there with Lala Harris.
	Time to move forward.
	Yeah, right?
	We go back and we'll look at this.
	A lot of people said, notice that Marxist fist there?
	When it put up there a time to change?
	Yeah, some interesting things there.
	Well, here are the facts that you need to know about COVID, and you'll need to keep this in mind about HMPV. Because they have similar effects here, right?
	And so somebody posted this up in protest on their store window back then.
	COVID-19 facts.
	The virus can travel six feet.
	It cannot travel six feet one inches or greater.
	It can live on all surfaces except anything that comes in the mail from Amazon.
	It does not live in Target, Walmart, Home Depot, Lowe's, or any grocery store.
	It's harmless during protests, riots, and looting.
	It is only deadly in bars, restaurants, small businesses, hair salons, and I would add churches.
	That was the most deadly, according to the CDC. And it cannot live on your food as long as you get it to go.
	If the food is fast enough.
	Pull through the drive-thru and get it and run.
	It can't live on that either.
	And then somebody else put this up.
	Transmission of COVID-19 occurs mostly through news broadcasting.
	The virus settles between the ears and it affects rational thinking.
	Symptoms may include hypervigilant cleansing, distrust of friends and neighbors, and an overwhelming urge to give up basic human rights in exchange for the perception of safety.
	Individuals with larger vacuums between the ears are at much higher risk.
	Here we are again.
	And the guy who somehow just put Hezbollah in the center of January the 6th is, it wasn't him, it was Hezbollah!
	Now we know.
	He's coming back into office, just in time.
	The outbreak, the alleged outbreak in China, is in this wave, as they call it, this wave of HMPV. It causes symptoms similar to those of COVID-19, which has raised alarms worldwide.
	Patients exhibit symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, fatigue, and dizziness.
	Wait a minute.
	This sounds like every cold remedy ad I've ever heard in my life.
	Take a couple of aspirins and don't call me in the morning.
	What is going on with this?
	They have now normalized that every respiratory illness, Every cold.
	And again, we've got to get Sam Bailey and her husband on again.
	Fascinating in that book, the fact that for 45 years, the UK had what they called a cold house.
	And they would bring volunteers in that were sick with a cold and volunteers who volunteered to try to catch the cold.
	And they did everything.
	They had them cough on them.
	They had them breathe on them.
	They shared food.
	They took mucus from the sick person and they put it in the other person and all the rest of this stuff.
	Still, they could never find, for 45 years, they could never find that the cold was contagious.
	But it did seem to be affected by cold weather.
	Maybe that's why.
	Well, those people that lived centuries ago, they're so stupid.
	They thought it was something, the body's reaction to cold weather or something.
	I don't know what they're talking about.
	We've got people like Fauci now doing real science, and the cold house in the UK shut down after 45 years and couldn't show anything for it.
	HMPV. Was identified in 2001, and it belongs to the same family as measles and mumps.
	Although it was formally discovered in 2001, the CDC believes that it has been prevalent since at least the mid-1950s.
	Well, if that's the case, why are we worried about it?
	And again, did they isolate it?
	How did they know that about the virus?
	Did they look under an electron microscope and see the virus?
	You can't do that, right?
	Remember Kerry Mullis?
	Fauci thinks you can look in an electron microscope and see the virus.
	Well, everybody thinks that now.
	Because they've been putting that out.
	HMPV can result in bronchitis and pneumonia.
	Just like a cold.
	So, the mirror is pushing the panic button.
	Come clean, China.
	Tell us what's really going on with this stuff.
	I know you're withholding this information and we're all going to die from this.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	When we come back, I've got several comments here I want to get to that people have put in.
	So stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	As a matter of fact, when we get back, we're going to take a look at, well, let's see what is coming up next.
	Oh, we have a very interesting story that is coming up.
	I kind of tipped it yesterday.
	And, well, I'll tell you about it when we come back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	We've got DGA. Thank you for the tip.
	It says, Trump wants Canada and Greenland.
	You talk about the liberal turn in the USA. What happens to the 45 million Canadians on socialized medicine and the 56,000 in Greenland on it?
	This is a disgrace.
	Yeah, you know, it's only a problem if...
	If the Democrats increase the roles of welfare, right?
	We're going to bring people in who are on welfare.
	Who knows?
	He said, I said from the beginning, Trump is here to destroy the Republican Party at any resemblance of a Christian nation.
	45 million Canadians, I guarantee, 35 million are hardcore liberals, and they want to euthanize people as well.
	That was the joke from Babylon Bee, talking about how...
	How Justin Trudeau was going to be taken out and euthanized now, because they've been focusing on this.
	This is a post-Christian country for a large amount.
	Look at the persecution that was so bad against pastors and churches that refused to lock down.
	Some of the worst persecution we saw anywhere was in Canada.
	Guard Goldsmith.
	Good to see you there, Guard.
	The Trump maniacs on Boston Radio were talking about how good an idea it would be to take the...
	The Panama Canal.
	Because they said, we can't let China threaten us on trade.
	So they want Trump to threaten people.
	Yeah.
	We've got to have the Panama Canal so that we can keep trade open.
	Except we don't want your trade.
	We're going to put confiscatory prices on all of your trade.
	So all of it is just conflicting stuff.
	There's all a bunch of noise that is there.
	And it is, again, it is, I agree with DG8.
	He is absolutely diametrically opposed to all conservative principles and all Christian principles.
	No doubt about it.
	That's what's so frustrating about this, that people can't see that.
	Audi, good to see you.
	Modern Retro Radio.
	DeSantis' statement is just more lip service.
	There'll never be meaningful accountability.
	He is a wall kisser, just like the ones who engineered the COVID scam.
	I agree that he's not going to do anything about this.
	He has had ample opportunity.
	As I said before, he's only marginally better.
	He is marginally better than the other people, but only marginally so.
	They were, along with Brian Kemp, some of the first ones to pull out of Trump's lockdown incentives and that type of thing.
	But everybody knows what's going on with this.
	Why are we still now just getting to these baby steps that are here?
	It does look like nothing is going to be done.
	It's just grandstanding.
	I agree.
	Dustin Helm, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	And before we get into the other article I was going to talk about, I loved this headline.
	Talking about the pandemic planners.
	They said they're coming for hoof and hen.
	That's exactly what they're coming for.
	They're coming for our food supply.
	That's what this bird flu stuff is about.
	And he said they're coming for hoof and hen and us again.
	It even rhymes.
	Excellent job there.
	That's Clayton Baker, MD. This guy's a medical doctor.
	And he's talking about what Fauci's replacement is doing.
	The NIAID has a new director.
	Dr. Jeanne, or Jean, I don't know if it's Jean or Jeanne, it's J-E-A-N-N-E, so I guess it could go either way.
	We'll just call her by her last name.
	Morazzo.
	Morazzo and another NIAID colleague, Dr. Michael Eisen, wrote a year-end editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine that accompanies a research paper On recent bird flu cases in the U.S. as well as a case report of a lone case of severe illness associated with bird flu in British Columbia.
	Here's what their summary said.
	Investigators now report in the journal a series of, that's the New England Journal of Medicine, a series of human cases from the U.S. and Canada.
	The former series involves 46 case patients with generally mild self-limited infection of the influenza type, 20 with exposure to poultry, 25 with exposure to dairy cows, and one with undefined 25 with exposure to dairy cows, and one with undefined exposure.
	Now, this is because they are searching for it there.
	Right?
	That's where they're looking for this stuff.
	And if you search for something with a PCR, you will find it.
	Because it is so easy to find anything if you magnify it by 1.1 trillion times.
	He says, They said, this is Marazzo at the NIAID, Fauci's replacement.
	Says the only hospitalization occurred in the case patient with undefined exposure.
	So they weren't even sure.
	This person was not even around any cows or chickens that they ran a PCR test on and got a positive result.
	Although hospitalization was not for respiratory illness.
	Well, there you go.
	They elaborate, and that is the case, I believe, of...
	Somebody that died, they said, well, we had our first bird flu casualty.
	Now, that was an elderly person who had multiple comorbidities.
	Have you heard this script before?
	In Canada, they said the 13-year-old girl with mild asthma and obesity presented with conjunctivitis as pink eye and fever and had progression to respiratory failure.
	After treatment, she recovered.
	She's got asthma.
	She's got a fever.
	And she's got pink eye.
	And she didn't die.
	Over an 8th month period, says this doctor on Brownstone, 46 cases of human bird flu occurred in the U.S. And they didn't.
	What they did was they had a PCR process.
	It's not even a legitimate test.
	And they have ramped this up to be more hyper-ridiculously sensitive than...
	The ones four or five years ago.
	So he said, to sum this up, there were no deaths.
	45 of the 46 infected persons had exposure to animals, but the majority of these things were pink eye, which you get if you don't wash your hands and you touch your eye.
	Only one U.S. patient was hospitalized, and that was not due to pneumonia, and that patient recovered.
	One severe case was identified in Canada, a country of 40 million people.
	Yeah, who all survived except for one.
	And actually that one didn't die.
	That was an asthmatic, morbidly obese young girl.
	She was treated successfully and she recovered.
	So I guess we should be afraid.
	Yeah, be very afraid.
	I'm afraid.
	Yeah, we should all tremble in fear.
	So, does it sound to you like a public health emergency worthy of the legacy media's recent exhumation of discredited COVID-era fear-mongers like Dr. Leanna Nguyen and Dr. Debra Scarflady-Burks?
	He left out Robert Redfield.
	You know, all these people that were around during the Trump administration as well.
	Leanna Nguyen was a Biden shill, for the most part.
	Democrat.
	She was pushing the mandates and stuff.
	Does it justify their hair on fire pronouncements on cable news shows everywhere?
	Pushing for indiscriminate PCR testing of animals and emergency authorization of more mRNA vaccines for humans?
	Does this sound to you like justification to continue to kill and to destroy millions upon millions of farm animals?
	When most animals who contract bird flu survive, recover and develop immunity?
	Yeah, the greatest threat...
	To these birds is the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
	They get one bird that's not even sick, and it tests positive with their procedure that's ridiculous.
	They kill everyone, all of them.
	They are the threat.
	Bird flu is not a threat to our food supply.
	The U.S. Department of Agriculture and the federal government are the threat to our food supply.
	He said the current circulating clade of the virus has been determined by independent researchers to very likely have originated at a U.S. government gain-of-function laboratory in Athens, Georgia.
	Now, this is where I part company with him.
	I don't believe any of that.
	Show me the isolated virus.
	Show me the isolated virus of COVID-19.
	All of this stuff about, you know, well, it came from a lab late one night.
	You know, this is like the monster mash, okay?
	I don't believe any of that stuff.
	If that was true, you've got an isolate of it.
	And they don't have an isolate of it.
	And so for them to talk about the clade, for them, oh, it's got this fur and cleavage and all this other kind of stuff, is like, come, give me a break.
	I'm very skeptical of all virus stuff, as I just said.
	But I'm especially skeptical of this stuff.
	And I have, and I continue to oppose...
	The wasteful and dangerous, but not in the way of engineering viruses, which I'm very skeptical of.
	But these labs are very dangerous, and I've been attacking them and calling for them to be shut down since 2014. A series of accidents that happened, a series of diseased animals that got out and could infect other people, bacteria or other things like that.
	The whole purpose of it was insane.
	The stated purpose was to bring in diseases.
	That were dangerous and lethal, perhaps, and to make them even more lethal, and to make them more easy to spread.
	I mean, this is Nazi science at its finest.
	So what are my friends at the NIAID's recommendations?
	Well, for one, they stress the urgent need for vigilant surveillance of emerging mutations and assessment of the threat of human-to-human transmission.
	Are they advocating for the willy-nilly testing of the entire livestock herds as promoted by Dr. Birx, which is sure to create a preponderance of false positives and to kill our food supply?
	That's what they're after, yeah.
	Especially because they want to go after, you know, the big guys can handle it.
	The big guys can handle it if you go in and kill a million chickens.
	You go to a small farmer and you say, well, I've got to kill all your chickens.
	You put them out of business.
	That's the purpose of this.
	The purpose, as they've already done in the UK, is to register all of your homegrown food.
	To register all of your chickens that you own and all the rest of the stuff.
	That's why I say we need to talk about home food freedoms.
	Instead of PCR swabbing every cow, chicken, and farm worker on Earth, how about we stop creating new mutant variants in the labs?
	How about we stop funding such utter madness with our tax dollars?
	How about, look, let's not just stop there.
	Let's get rid of the labs, but let's get rid of the NIAID. Let's get rid of the NIH. Let's not stop there.
	Let's get rid of HHS. There's no authority for them under the Constitution, and look at what they've done.
	Just like the EPA, they're trying to kill us.
	Kill us economically, and also...
	That's what the EPA, the Department of Energy, and these other ones are doing.
	They're trying to kill us economically.
	These people are trying to literally kill us through our food supply and everything else.
	The FDA, the USDA, get rid of them.
	There's no authority for them, and there's no need for them.
	If you want to have food inspectors, that's something that can and should be done at the local level.
	But Merazzo and Eisen make no mention of common sense.
	They stress the need for, you guessed it, Vaccines.
	This is CJ Baker, a medical doctor, specialist in internal medicine, who has been a physician for a quarter of a century in clinical practice.
	He's skeptical.
	Well, I'll read one more article here before we get to the one that I said I think you'll find interesting.
	I think this one is interesting as well, and it is very important for the MAGA people to understand, but they never will.
	They can't understand how, You can coerce people with money.
	Even as they are hoping that Trump is going to bribe the people of Greenland to do what he wants them to do, they completely dismiss out of hand that Trump bribed governors, Republican and Democrat, to do what he wanted them to do in 2020. That he pushed them for a globalist agenda.
	Now, some people are looking at this and saying, grabbing Greenland and all the rest of the stuff, you're trying to create Region 1?
	Well, you know, yeah, with money.
	And that's what he did for the globalists, the World Economic Forum, all the rest of them.
	That was their agenda.
	World Health Organization.
	Fiscal federalism.
	Fiscal federalism.
	In other words, bribes and blackmails with money.
	This is from Mises.org.
	No more federal funding of local government.
	They said, if you want to get a hold of what is happening and get a handle on wasteful spending, You doge people.
	What you need to do is follow the money and look at how the federal government gets people to do everything based on money.
	Is it really that hard for the MAGA people to understand how Trump operated?
	Look at the thing that they think is the existential issue of our society.
	Women in sports and men in women's showers and stuff like that, the sporting things.
	That is reprehensible.
	But if they look at that issue that is so vital to them, they should understand that Trump threatened to cut off their funds if they do it, and Biden and Obama threatened to cut off their funds if they didn't do it.
	That's the way these guys get it done.
	That's the way they get around the restrictions of the Ninth and Tenth Amendment, saying that you don't have any power to do this.
	Well, yeah, but I can pay local...
	State and local officials to do it.
	And I can pay corporations to do it too, right?
	I can pay corporations.
	I can make it worth their while.
	A lot of different perks.
	If they censor people.
	And it's not coming from us.
	We just tell them who we'd like to have them censored.
	But, you know, hey, that's their decision.
	And you've got a lot of conservatives and libertarians who say, yeah, that's right.
	It's a private company and they can do whatever they want.
	Well, why do they want to do it?
	Because they're being paid by the government to do it.
	Speaking of pain, you know, we had, not only did Bezos go down to Mar-a-Lago and kiss the ring, but, you know, bribes can take a lot of different shapes, can't they?
	He is spending $40 million for a documentary, the hagiography that I talked about, of Melania Trump.
	How's that?
	To create a new mythos about the Trump family.
	I'm sure it won't have anything about Jeffrey Epstein in it.
	$40 million.
	He's got to play catch-up to Sauron Musk.
	And it simply is bribery through flattery and the rest of the stuff.
	Anyway, in this article, Mises begins talking about how, you know, look at all the intersections that we've got that have curb cuts in them.
	And, you know, as soon as they started putting in curbs, they started putting in curb cuts to make it easier for people to walk.
	But it also helps people who have other mobility issues, disabilities, if they're in a wheelchair and so forth.
	And so the government started funding it more and more.
	And that was a good thing.
	You know, we want to have some things like that done.
	But, of course, it doesn't have to be done by the federal government.
	And it's the same type of thing that we see with education, with health care.
	We see it with curb cuts, for example.
	And this goes on for a while, and they help people with these needs.
	They insinuate themselves in a situation.
	Bring in helicopter loads full of cash because they can just create as much cash as they wish with their fiat currency.
	Everybody's happy to see them there.
	It's so great.
	And then all of a sudden, what happens is you get mandates and legislation.
	And they start dictating things.
	And then it starts costing you money.
	He also gives the example of roads and highways, how the federal government got involved in it, with the interstate system and all the rest of the stuff.
	How it gradually grew from the time that we had cars until the mid-century, where Eisenhower puts in the interstate system.
	And then, after a couple of decades of that, Richard Nixon decided that he, I own this, and I can use this.
	To manipulate you.
	And I can put a 55 mile an hour speed limit on there.
	And if you don't do the 55 mile an hour speed limit, okay, yeah, I can't force you to do that because of the 9th and 10th Amendment, but I can withhold all funding for roads from the federal government if you don't do it, you see?
	It's the bribery followed by the blackmail.
	It's the way it always works.
	And so he said the heart of all this, if the people at Doge want to look at it, We talk about the federal
	government, we think about the federal government has centralized so much power.
	Do we think about federalism?
	Well, that's centralizing everything into Washington.
	No, it's exactly the opposite.
	The federal government was supposed to be decentralized.
	And yet, just as the concept of that word in many people's minds has been completely inverted and means 180 degrees different from what it originally was, that's what we're talking about here.
	So he's saying the money ought to be done, financing ought to be done to these things at various levels.
	How do we get independent of the government and these financial strings of control?
	Well, we've had some people in the Tennessee legislature, although their fellow Republicans didn't want to follow through with it, but we had a couple of individuals who said, let's tell them that we're going to stop taking their money for education.
	So they're not going to define our curriculum.
	So they're not going to put boys and girls' bathrooms and showers and things like that.
	But most people don't want to do that.
	That is how they extend their power.
	And it's exactly what Trump did during the pandemic.
	Federal COVID-19 spending to state and local governments was the biggest that we have seen.
	Legislation passed in 2020 and in 2021, enacted three tranches of direct relief payments to individuals and families.
	Two of those took place under Trump.
	Two of the three.
	One of them took place under Biden.
	It was Trump's March 2020 CARES Act, then later the Relief Act in December of 2020, and then Biden came in again in March of 2021 with the American Rescue Plan Act.
	That is what has put us on the road to bankruptcy.
	So if Doge wants to do something about it, start by stopping the government bribing everybody to get them to do what they want.
	See, everything that's done in the government now is either done by the bureaucratic agencies, the alphabet agencies, that are under the executive branch.
	Congress doesn't want to pass the laws.
	They need too many laws.
	They can never get that done and still get on TV with their dog and pony show hearings.
	So what they do is they kick it over to the bureaucracy.
	We pass it so we can find out what's in it, said Nancy Pelosi, and she was exactly right.
	And so they create all these regulations.
	The government also then bribes or blackmails financially the different states.
	That's the way our government runs.
	I should do an update on the I'm a bill on Capitol Hill.
	No, no, no.
	There are no more bills like that.
	But they said, any progress to try to get back some fiscal responsibility that DOGE might make will be slow and difficult.
	Congress and the President must control their spending urges.
	Americans will have to accept some degree of austerity if their state and local taxes increase in order to accommodate reductions in federal spending.
	In other words, none of this is going to happen.
	I don't believe anything's going to happen with a DOGE. The whole thing, as I said before, is a DOGE. It's all just virtue signaling.
	All this stuff has to come from Congress and the President, and they don't want to cut spending anywhere.
	And so they create these commissions.
	This is just the latest in a long line of commissions that I've seen going back to the Reagan administration.
	How can we get fiscal responsibility?
	Where can we cut waste and all the rest of it?
	And they never act on it.
	They never act on it.
	But the bottom line for us, and it can get personal, right?
	It can get personal because now we're looking at the explosion homeschooling, we're looking at the explosion in charter schools.
	Don't sell your liberty for a bowl of porridge.
	That's what they're going to do.
	That's going to be the trick.
	That's going to be the offer that they've got there.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	That's right, boys and girls.
	There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
	Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
	It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense.
	Go to davidknight.go to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn.
	He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
	Yark!
	Fiat!
	They're doing what?
	In the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	This is The David Knight Show.
	Well, Wes Robertson says the CDC just came out and said that even with one human death from H1N1, this bird flu is not a threat.
	Translation, people aren't buying the propaganda.
	Yeah, they're kind of slow walking it.
	Right now, they're letting the media personalities set their hair on fire.
	And then they come out and say, no, there's nothing to worry about.
	And, of course, that's the other part of the thing that we saw from the very beginning, isn't it?
	You know, Fauci was the one who came out.
	There's nothing to worry about here.
	It's going to be fine.
	You know, all of a sudden it's like, freak out.
	You've got to wear the mask.
	You've got to wear two or three masks now.
	And you've got to be forced to wear the mask and everything.
	They're going to freak everybody out.
	Well, I want to get to the thing that I thought was interesting.
	I think you'll find it interesting as well.
	I mentioned it briefly yesterday.
	I said, you know, there's been not only Richard Dawkins, but we've had now another atheist who has come out.
	And I said, you know, we really do need Christianity, even though I don't believe in it.
	We really do need it as a foundation of society.
	And that's what our country was founded on.
	And when we talk about America being a Christian nation, and everybody comes back and says, well, this guy was a Freemason, this guy was this and that.
	It isn't about whether or not they were.
	They were practicing Christians or genuine Christians.
	They might have professed to be a Christian.
	You might not agree with them on their doctrine or whatever, but it was the Christian principles that they were upholding, and not even them.
	It was everybody in our society agreed upon these principles.
	And so, you know, there was something of a reflection of our society, just like Trump is a reflection of our society.
	And so this atheist writer, Interestingly enough, he's stronger about this than most Christian speakers that you'll see out there.
	He's a bigger supporter of Christianity than most of these megachurch pastors that are out there.
	He says, true Christianity is the key to saving America.
	A prominent atheist writer, and this is coming from Crosswalk, argues that the U.S. needs to embrace more Christian values to get back on track.
	But he says the church is failing in its role of representing Jesus.
	His name is Jonathan Rauch.
	R-A-U-C-H. I hope I'm pronouncing it correctly.
	He self-identifies as an atheist.
	He's a senior fellow at the liberal Brookings Institution.
	And he says this in a new book.
	He calls it Cross Purposes.
	Christianity's broken bargain with democracy.
	He says the modern church is too secular, too fearful, and too lacking in true faith.
	Well, he was paying attention in 2020, wasn't he?
	Too secular, too fearful, and lacking in true faith.
	Roush says what really needs to happen to get our country on a better track is for Christianity not to become more secular or more liberal.
	But to become more like itself, to become more truly Christian, he said.
	The three fundamentals of Christianity, he asserted, align very well with Madisonian liberalism.
	Well, that's because the country was founded on Christian principles.
	Regardless of the personal lives of these people, which none of us can evaluate that two and a half centuries later.
	We can't accurately determine whether these people are Christians or not.
	Nobody knows that but God.
	That's not for us to judge.
	Certainly not for somebody who lived 250 years ago.
	But anyway, he defined those three fundamentals as number one, imitating Jesus.
	Number two, not being afraid.
	Fear not.
	How many times is that mentioned in the Bible?
	Fear not.
	And number three, forgiving one another.
	In other words, we're not going to have this grudge and say, you know, 200 years ago.
	400 years ago, we had slavery.
	You've got to pay me now.
	Everybody that, people that were masters and people that were slaves, they're all dead now, but you've got to pay me.
	You know, that type of thing.
	I'm not letting that go.
	We know what that's about.
	So it's about imitating Jesus, not being afraid, and forgiving one another.
	He said those things are very much like how you want a constitutional republic to operate.
	You can't be afraid of losing all the time.
	Sometimes you've got to let the other team win.
	You know, that's why you would have politicians after an election, They wouldn't try to jail their opponents.
	Which Biden did.
	Now Trump is going to follow that precedent, I guess.
	The two of them setting the most authoritarian precedents for each other.
	They are more than happy to follow in each other's footsteps.
	Sometimes you've got to let the other team win.
	Or accept it when they win.
	You have to trust the system.
	You have to believe in traits like the basic dignity and equality and humanity of everyone.
	Even the people you oppose.
	And you can't be so judgmental that you think that if you lose the next election, everything is over, and the bad people win, and you've somehow got to drive them out of the country.
	He said, and when I saw that, I thought, well, there it is.
	It's in the Scripture, so why aren't Christians doing that, said the atheist.
	You know, that's why we have accountability with each other, isn't it?
	Because sometimes, even when we look in the mirror, we can't really see ourselves.
	And we need to have somebody else who's going to speak into it.
	This is the guy who is looking at this all from the outside.
	And you know, it was Madison who said, well, we have government because men are not angels.
	But because we're not angels, we can't trust the government.
	That's the dilemma that you've got there.
	You know, we've got to have checks and balances, in other words, some of these things that are there.
	They understood the fallen nature of humanity, which is very different from what You hear the liberals say.
	The liberals say, well, we're all basically good.
	Unless you oppose them on politics or some other agenda, then they think you're basically bad.
	But again, when you look at this, would any of the Trump MAGA pastors say this stuff?
	No, they've been saying exactly that.
	They've been the ones saying, hey, if the other side wins, it's over.
	You know, how many times, I was so sick and tired of it.
	I've heard this every election now.
	And I'm getting pretty old to hear that, you know, this is the most important election of our life.
	And if we lose this one, there isn't going to be an America in the future.
	And we've heard that from everybody, from Sauron Musk to all of these conservative Christians.
	And, you know, some of them even use the Bible.
	You've got some people like Paula White.
	But, I mean, you've even got other, you've got a lot of these quote-unquote conservatives who read and study the Bible, but they fall into the trap.
	That this atheist just outlined.
	Roush said the founding fathers believed Christianity was foundational to a healthy nation.
	He said Christianity is, listen to this, a load-bearing wall of democracy.
	Or actually, we have a republic.
	But nevertheless, you get the idea.
	It is the load-bearing wall.
	The founders told us that.
	They didn't specify that you have to be a Christian, per se.
	But they said that our liberal and secular constitution relies on virtues like truthfulness, lawfulness, and equal dignity of every individual.
	Did they practice that perfectly?
	No.
	No.
	Was there hypocrisy in their life?
	Yes.
	Is there hypocrisy in your life?
	Yes.
	And if you say otherwise, you're a hypocrite.
	Again, we're all struggling.
	And, you know, they understood that from a standpoint.
	Again, there's that inconsistency, major one, of slavery that was there in terms of equal dignity of every individual.
	But they were in a process of changing.
	You know, it's kind of like when you look at somebody, everybody gets so excited when you see a celebrity.
	He says, oh, I'm a Christian now.
	And it's like, okay, well, time will tell if this person sticks with it.
	You know, if you start to see some changes in their life because their mind has been changed, that's what repentance really is.
	It isn't them making themselves better.
	But they've changed the way they think about things.
	And as a man thinks, that is the way he acts.
	And so you start to see some of these things, but there's still going to be a lot of stuff that's hanging on in their life just like it does in our lives.
	Never get all that stuff out of there.
	So the question is, if you were somebody that was trying to help them and advice, we look at this and we see something that to us might be a pretty major thing because we never got involved in it.
	It's still a remnant from their former life.
	Oh, I don't know about that.
	But they're in a process.
	We're all in a process.
	He said all these things like truthfulness, lawfulness, dignity, right?
	Again, what did B.F. Skinner say?
	Beyond freedom and dignity.
	If you don't have any dignity, you don't have any freedom.
	B.F. Skinner, the behavioral psychologist, wanted to treat us all like animals.
	To manipulate us by our animal insight.
	And we all are part animal, but there's something more about humanity.
	Something that gives us dignity and freedom.
	B.F. Skinner didn't like that.
	that bf skinner wanted to shut that down merely treat us as animals and if he's going to treat us as animals first of all you got to take our dignity away from us and then you take away the freedom and that's where we are today um the constitution won't furnish these things The source that they relied on principally was religion to teach those things.
	Because schools at that point in time were all religious.
	Guess what?
	They're all still religious.
	All these secular schools?
	They're religious too.
	They've got a religion that they're selling people.
	You may not be aware of it.
	They may not even recognize it as a religion, but it's a religion nevertheless.
	So they set up schools to teach that.
	And again, if you go back when we were doing homeschooling, there weren't as many resources as there are today.
	We went back and we looked at a lot of old textbooks.
	And people were much, much better educated 200 years ago.
	But one of the things that was really striking was it all centered around the Bible.
	It really did.
	And so they thought principally that it was going to be religion.
	It was going to teach those things.
	Religion was going to build and transmit those values.
	And it turned out that for most of our history, Christianity has been pretty good at that, he said.
	But when the church becomes less Christian, he said, people began looking to other places for their source of values.
	And that's where we are now.
	You are here.
	They go to wokeness, or they go to QAnon, or they go to MAGA. And those turn out to not be the kinds of values that you can use to underpin a democracy.
	And that's a situation we see increasingly stuck in.
	Too many Christians, he said, have embraced either thin Christianity or sharp Christianity.
	Thin Christianity is what he calls Christianity that becomes secularized.
	And it becomes a consumer good.
	It becomes a commodity.
	And so the problem with that...
	Is that a lot of the benefits of belief to the soul and to the republic come from taking it seriously and participating and joining with the community and giving yourself to others, not just treating it as a consumer good.
	Do you hear that?
	Prosperity gospel preachers like Paula White, who is Trump's key person, or was it Norman Vincent Peale?
	That's the guy that really he looks up to.
	But, you know, Paula White is along that same thing.
	Your relationship with the church is a consumer good.
	And, of course, that would be what Trump would jump into.
	When religion, especially Christian, when it becomes that thin, people go elsewhere for their faith and for their sense of meaning in life.
	Remember Hillary Clinton when she talked about the politics of meaning?
	You know, for Hillary Clinton, and I talked about this many times, I said, you know, it's pitiful to see that in her life.
	I understand she's a very dangerous criminal, you know.
	She has, you know, a lot of people have done, I'm not just talking about the Clinton side, I'm talking about wars and things like that.
	She's set on people.
	Very dangerous individual, but still to be pitied.
	Because she has no meaning in her life.
	The meaning of her life is nothing other than politics.
	The politics of meaning.
	And I said, how pathetic is that?
	Pathetic like Saron Musk, whose meaning in life is money and politics.
	Anyway, he says, when people have a thin Christianity, they go elsewhere to try to find meaning in life.
	They go to politics.
	And those are terrible sources of values.
	Politics don't sustain the republic.
	They undermine it.
	And then he said we have sharp Christianity that perceives itself increasingly as being at war with the culture around it.
	Now, understand, we do have a spiritual war that is happening all the time.
	But this is different.
	This is a siege mentality.
	This is not something that is looking at spiritual warfare.
	And they don't turn to spiritual weapons, which are mighty, but they turn to politics and other things equally, as he points out.
	He said this is a Christianity that's afraid that it is losing its predominant cultural role in American society.
	And see, again, they have missed the point.
	If you're looking at it for consumer goods or you're looking at it for gaining clout or something like that, that's thin Christianity.
	But if you are looking at this because you're worried about losing the Christian cultural role, no.
	Again, he said at the very beginning, he said, we've got to go back and point people to Jesus.
	This atheist understands it.
	If you're pointing at the culture, you're not going to make it.
	You know, the term sin was an archery term.
	It was saying that you missed the target.
	Well, you're not going to hit anything if you're not pointing at it.
	If you're not pointing at Jesus, you're not going to win that.
	You point at the culture, even if you win the culture war, what advantage does that have?
	None.
	None at all.
	So he says, This is a Christianity that's afraid that's losing its predominant cultural role in American society that the next election is the one that will end Christianity as we know it if we lose.
	You see?
	How many times have I seen that?
	That was the whole MAGA side.
	All these people desperate.
	People, by the way, who will vote for the lesser of two evils because, hey, if that other evil wins, it'll end Christianity.
	When you vote for evil, you're voting to end Christianity.
	It's just that simple.
	Speak out against it, do whatever you want to do, but don't support it.
	Don't support it.
	So he says the next election is the one that's going to end Christianity as we know it.
	And so it becomes smaller, it becomes more and more paranoid, it becomes frightened about its future.
	And it does things that become more political.
	Because of fear.
	Because of fear.
	Rauch said the so-called religious right, when they talked about family values, were on to something.
	He says, I think it can only do good and not harm to the country and to Christian witness if Christians can do the work of rediscovering and elevating those elements of the Christian faith which uphold our democracy, which uphold the teachings of Christ, said the atheist Rauch.
	I can't see that any possible harm would ever result from that.
	And so what I come down to is addressing my Christian fellow citizens and saying, why not give Jesus a try?
	That's amazing.
	Why not give Jesus a try?
	Well, I'm going to follow that up.
	This is a guy who is a Christian apologist.
	I think he's from Canada.
	And he went on with Joe Rogan and was talking about this very thing as well.
	He says, are we going to search for Jesus or are we going to search for moralism?
	And he had some great things to say as well as this atheist.
	I really like the way that Jordan Peterson articulates it, but I think he misses the forest for the trees.
	How so?
	In that he sees Jesus as an archetype.
	And I don't think actually even Jesus gives you the opportunity to see him as the archetype.
	Because I have this love-hate relationship with all of Peterson's stuff, because he seems to get so much right where he walks up to the line, but he doesn't want to cross over.
	And is the crossover, you think, connected to a life in academia?
	No.
	What do you think it is?
	I wonder, and I'd love to talk to him about this, like how do you remedy this issue that...
	Because he seems to think it...
	That the concept of Jesus as an example is more important than the actual flesh-and-blood, first-century itinerant Jewish preacher who was crucified and rose from the dead physically, which is the claim of the Gospels and the rest of the New Testament.
	That that's an example for us to look on and live by.
	But I actually think that Jesus condemns moralism.
	And ultimately what I see Peterson doing is...
	Looking at Jesus as a moral example, and if Jesus is nothing but a moral example, then you can save yourself and you don't actually need a savior.
	And so, I think actually Jesus would have critiqued that, because Jesus was very against moralism.
	And how do you define Jesus being against moralism?
	Like, what do you mean by that exactly?
	Well, Jesus looks at the religiosity of his day with particular groups like the Pharisees and the Sadducees, who are these other, like...
	These other groups of Jews during these days.
	So we talked about the Essenes, who actually aren't mentioned in the Bible, but there are other groups like the Pharisees, who are like lay scholars, and the Sadducees, who are professional priest scholars.
	And he's constantly critiquing the fact that they have this hypocritical religiosity to them, where they're doing things like tithing their mint leaves.
	Like, to make sure that they get all of...
	This is where we get the idea of the letter of the law versus the intention of the law.
	Like, Jesus critiques them for that, because he says, you're trying to do everything right, and you're missing the point.
	So, one of the things he says is, like, if your donkey falls in a ravine on the Sabbath, do you pull it out?
	Or does that work?
	Like, what's the point of the Sabbath?
	Is it to not do any work?
	Like, is it to make sure that you're not working too hard because you might be breaking the Sabbath?
	Or, like, what is the point?
	He says, like, the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.
	And that there's this intention.
	This is the whole Sermon on the Mount, Matthew chapter 5, is he keeps saying, you have heard it said, but I say.
	And he refers to the Mosaic Law.
	And it looks like he's critiquing the Mosaic Law, but he's not actually.
	He's getting back to the intention of the law.
	So when he says, you know, you have heard it said, do not commit murder.
	But I say to you, anybody who harbors a hate for their brother in their heart has already committed murder.
	And what he's getting to is like, what's the intention?
	What's the meaning of the law that God gives to you?
	Because the law is like a mirror.
	It shows you how dirty you are.
	But his critique is he's like, you guys are trying to clean yourself with a mirror.
	That's stupid.
	If anything, it's going to make you more messy.
	Like, get in the shower.
	The law is not what cleans you.
	The law is what reveals that you're dirty.
	And so in that sense, I think, you know, if Jesus is a moral example, it actually misses what I think Jesus actually said about what his purpose was, in that you can't do enough to actually live up to the standard that God holds you to.
	And so if you keep striving, you're actually going to wear yourself out and be exhausted.
	Like atheists.
	I didn't say you did, Joe.
	Yeah.
	Well, it's kind of interesting, you know, when he gives that example of Jesus saying, hey, you hate somebody.
	You've murdered them already in your heart.
	Also, again, I guess what we should take away from that, well, if I've already committed murder, I might as well go ahead and pull the trigger and shoot them, right?
	I was talking to Whistler about Jimmy Carter and what he told his Sunday school class.
	I've looked at a lot of women with lust in my heart, and Jesus says, well, if you committed lust in your heart with these women, it's like committing adultery.
	So I don't have any problems with anybody who commits adultery.
	Somebody who wants to leave their wife and go shack up with somebody said, Jimmy Carter, that's fine.
	Really?
	So I guess, you know, if you have an argument.
	You should just, you're arguing with people in politics, you just pull out the gun and shoot them, right?
	No.
	But, yeah, Soyink Goy said, I saw a t-shirt with Trump and Jesus on it.
	I've seen a lot of that artwork.
	It is absolutely pathetic.
	Syrian girl, so sad that we get a better Christian sermon from an atheist than the pastors in most of our churches.
	That's absolutely true.
	He can see it.
	And he's got a lot of discernment there, even though he doesn't have faith.
	Those are two different things, aren't they?
	Discernment and faith.
	Richard Dawkins, by the way, had spoken about it, and spoken about the fact that he liked Christian culture, but as Britain is being overrun with Islamists, he says, I don't like that.
	He said, I always liked the Christian culture.
	I liked the evening prayers and things like that that you'd hear.
	So he preferred that.
	He also realized that it was a society that was a safer society, had respect for individuals and women and other things like that.
	But Richard Dawkins has just left the Freedom From Religion board because it pulled an article opposing transgender, they say, ideology.
	But it's not ideology.
	It is actually theology.
	It really is.
	And, of course, you know, freedom from religion is not what's in the, is where people go around suing everybody everywhere.
	The Bill of Rights is not about freedom from religion.
	It's about the free expression of religion, which is what they are dead set against.
	And they try to shut down everywhere that they can.
	Everywhere they're trying to shut down the free expression of religion.
	And they even do it in private property issues as well.
	We were there for the grand opening of Answers in Genesis Museum, the Creation Museum.
	And they had rented a plane that pulls banners, you know?
	And they were, I don't even remember what they were complaining about.
	They had their banner up there, freedom from religion and everything.
	It's like, if somebody bills something that is private like that, you don't have any say-so in it.
	But they just want to shut down the free exercise of religion anywhere.
	And so what happens is Richard Dawkins, who's now...
	83, step down from the honorary board of the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
	It's an atheist legal organization that advocates for a strong separation of church and state.
	No, it's not.
	This is Christian Post.
	They got that wrong.
	No, it's intolerant.
	It's intolerant.
	And you can see the intolerance in the title of the organization.
	And so Richard Dawkins just learned just how intolerant and close-minded The Freedom From Religion Society,
	or whatever they are, Foundation, pulled an article.
	That was titled, Biology is Not Bigotry.
	They pulled it from their blog.
	That article, Biology is Not Bigotry, was written by an honorary board member, Jerry Coyne, published December the 26th.
	It was a response to a previous Freethought Now, that's the name of their blog, piece that was titled, What is a Woman?
	That one, what is a woman, concluded that, quote, a woman is whoever she says she is.
	Well, Klein vehemently pushed back on that idea, and so has Richard Dawkins in the past.
	He says this, of course, is a tautology.
	It still leaves open the question of what a woman really is and the remarkable redefinition of a term with a long biological history.
	Can be seen only as an attempt to force ideology onto nature.
	He said, because some people feel that their identity is not adequately recognized by biology, they choose to impose ideology onto biology and to concoct a new definition of a woman.
	So, again, they are imposing their ideology.
	They're imposing their religion.
	His article defended the biological definition of a woman as an adult human female, and elaborated on the consequences of failing to recognize the biological difference between males and females.
	He concluded by saying it is not transphobic to accept the biological reality of binary sex and to reject concepts that are based on ideology.
	One should never have to choose between scientific theology and trans rights, he said.
	Transgender people should surely enjoy all the moral and legal rights of everyone else, but moral and legal rights do not extend to areas in which the indelible stamp of sex results in compromising the legal and moral rights of others.
	He insisted that transgender women, this is quoting from him, for example, should not compete athletically against biological women, should not serve as rape counselors and workers in battered women's shelters, or if convicted of a crime, should not be placed in a woman's prison.
	I Boom.
	He just committed blasphemy against their religion.
	Again, you don't have freedom of opinion with these people.
	Because just like that other part of the First Amendment, you know, the free exercise of religion, you don't get the free exercise of your speech either.
	They will censor you.
	They will censor anything that they don't like.
	That's the whole point of this organization to start with.
	COIN contends that the Freedom From Religion Foundation's incursion into gender activism takes it far outside its historically two-fold mission of educating the public about non-theism and keeping religion out of government and social policies.
	No, their mission has always been About suppressing free exercise of religion in public, even if it's in public at a private area, as I said.
	And it's not non-theism.
	It is a religion.
	Atheists have their gods, and they are fiercely worshipped.
	As a matter of fact, he was not the only person, Richard Dawkins was not the only person to resign.
	Because of this editorial and because of their response, another individual did, and he pointed out very clearly, he said, with this action, the Freedom From Religion Foundation is no longer a defender of freedom from religion, but it is the imposer of a new religion, complete with dogma, blasphemy, and heretics.
	That is what LGB has always been.
	It's always been a religion.
	And of course, atheism and secularism, they're also religions.
	They've also got their dogmas, their blasphemies, and their heretics.
	That was written by Steve Pinker, who is a Canadian psychologist and psycholinguist, they said.
	He also resigned from the board.
	But he really nailed it.
	He nailed it better than Richard Dawkins did.
	He says, no longer a defender of freedom from religion, but it is the imposer of a new religion, and that's what this is all about.
	So, going back to the original article that they took issue with, Coyne's post, he said, we've decided to remove this post as it does not reflect our values or principles, you see?
	No freedom.
	No freedom of speech, just like no freedom of religion.
	He shared the contents of an email that Richard Dawkins sent announcing his departure.
	Dawkins said, It is with real sadness, because of my personal regard for you both, that I feel obliged to resign from the Honorary Board of the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
	Publishing the silly and unscientific What is a Woman article by Cat Grant was a minor error of judgment.
	Redeemed by the decision to publish a rebuttal by a distinguished scientist from the relevant field, namely biology.
	But alas, the sequel was an act of unseemly panic.
	When you came to listen to the hysterical squeals from predictable quarters and retrospectively censored that excellent rebuttal.
	Moreover, to summarily take it down without even informing the author of your intention was an act of lamentable discourtesy to a member of your own honorary board, a board which I now leave with regret.
	So, Richard Dawkins' position was that they succumbed out of fear and kowtowed to criticism.
	But the psychologist is the one who got it right.
	Psychologists said, no, this is...
	You're imposing a new religion on people.
	We do not feel that support for LGBTQ rights against the religious backlash is something that we should run from.
	And that's it.
	You see, when they say they're defending by using their censorship now.
	They are defending LGBTQ rights.
	No, actually what they're doing, everything that they do, is in opposition to God.
	Right?
	Because they are the imposers of a new religion.
	Now when we talk about biological sex, again, it goes back to Adam and Eve.
	This interesting article just came out on Daily Star.
	Scientists discover evidence that the Bible's Adam and Eve really did exist.
	The idea that mankind was spawned from one pair of humans.
	It was previously thought to be far-fetched.
	These are people who are as detached from reality as the transgender people.
	You mean that prior, at some point in the past, we had asexual reproduction?
	And, you know, sexual reproduction is one of these things that screams design, doesn't it?
	I mean, for Darwin, it was the human eye.
	But it's even more basic than that.
	It's just sexual reproduction.
	How do you get these complementary things that are so incredibly complex?
	And as we learn more and more biology, we see more and more of the complexity that is there.
	Well, these are a couple of scientific studies.
	The idea that mankind was spawned from a pair of humans previously thought to be far-fetched.
	How in the world was that far-fetched?
	Ancestors who passed on the male Y chromosomes and female mitochondrial DNA to today's humans were thought to have lived tens of thousands of years apart.
	Now, that is far-fetched.
	But now we've got two major studies.
	So if somebody's done a scientific study, it's got to be true.
	Well, you know, not all studies are true.
	We've still got some other studies that disagree with that.
	But, look, it's the DNA. And if we look at the DNA, that is quite clear, even to the people who discovered it, even though they tried to run from the Bible's definition of that.
	It's quite clear that that is...
	Intelligence behind it.
	It is a very sophisticated code, an error-correcting code.
	This other individual said, well, and also we have the geographical area based on biblical descriptions and archaeologists.
	The area known as Mesopotamia, which is now eastern Syria, northwestern Turkey, and most of Iraq.
	Not only does a biblical account say the garden lay in the east, I mean, the east of Israel, but it also mentions the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in connection with the Garden of Eden.
	We also have, and a lot of people have talked about the fact, you've probably heard the phrase as well, the cradle of civilization, the plain of Shinar in that area.
	They said it's kind of interesting because all of a sudden, you have all these civilizations that spring up around the world, China, India, Europe, all these others.
	They all spring up at the same time, and they all came from this one area, the cradle of civilization or civilizations.
	They all started about the same time.
	Isn't that interesting?
	And you go back and you look at the picture characters that they have in China.
	Yeah, the picture of a big ship is a small ship with eight people in it, like Noah's Ark.
	And many, many, many other things.
	Other things that reference the Garden of Eden and other things like that.
	But yeah, no, no, we're just going to ignore all of that.
	But here's where we are right now.
	You know, not only do we need to counter this idea that we find meaning in our cultural superiority, That we find meaning in politics.
	That politics can solve all of our problems.
	Politics can't solve any of our problems.
	We also have another challenge that is coming, and that, of course, is going to be artificial intelligence and the transhumanists.
	And a lot of Christians are not even paying attention to this, because if they were, they would be calling Sauron Musk a Baphomet billionaire, which is what I call him.
	This guy has checked all the boxes.
	This is an article talking about Ray Kurzweil and his idea of the singularity, where we're going to merge with machines.
	But, of course, Elon Musk says the same thing.
	But nobody wants to criticize Elon Musk anymore because of politics, evidently.
	It's safe to criticize the idea, as it's being sold to us by people like Ray Kurzweil.
	But, you know, the Singularity Institute that he runs was paid for by Peter Thiel.
	And Elon Musk is the one who wants to put sensors in our brains.
	Elon Musk is the one saying we're going to have to merge with AI. It's going to kill us all.
	We're going to have to become cyborgs in order to survive.
	And the good news is we get to live forever, and we get to become like gods.
	I mean, these people are out front about this stuff.
	You know, this is not—I mean, this is more in your face than Trump saying, we want to have—we want U.S., Canada, Greenland, we want to— Reproduce region number one of the Club of Rome or whatever.
	This is much more in your face.
	Ray Kurzweil.
	In a world with artificial intelligence, what will life be like?
	Well, we simply don't know.
	Will it be like Star Trek or will it be like The Matrix?
	It's anybody's guess.
	Well, again, we come back to this.
	Fear not.
	There's no reason to be afraid of this.
	We need to confront it.
	We need to expose it.
	Don't ever fear this stuff.
	I said, a lot of Christians are not talking about AI and the dangerous aspects of it.
	I said, what is at stake here?
	This is coming from WNG. What is at stake here isn't just national defense or re-engineered economy.
	What is at stake is the re-engineering of the human race.
	And for those who go before AI to prepare the way, people like evangelists, like Ray Kurzweil.
	The technology doesn't merely promise, but also you'd have to put in there Sauron Musk.
	The technology doesn't merely promise to upgrade productivity.
	It is a secular eschaton, an apocalypse that will end an old order and institute a new order.
	And a select few may even merge with artificial intelligence and, according to these prophets, potentially live for thousands of years while the rest of us will likely be deemed Economically useless, or as Trump put it, we're not essential, right?
	And be relegated to life on the dole, which is what universal basic income is.
	We'll put you on there, we'll slowly kill you, we'll sterilize you, and other things like that.
	Don't forget that communism promised all sorts of things that it never delivered, but it hasn't stopped people from believing in it.
	We say the same thing about climate.
	Alarmism.
	It's made all kinds of predictions, but people still believe in it, even though they've all failed.
	What we're up against isn't merely a new technology.
	We're up against a new vision of the future, a secular utopia in which sheep and goats will be separated and assigned to their respective rewards and punishments.
	You know, it's always been the case that people just can't imagine that they're going to die.
	Yeah, you can acknowledge, yeah, someday I'm going to die, but not anytime soon.
	And I'm going to stash up my money and I'm going to store this stuff and I'm going to live a great life and all the rest of this stuff.
	They would lie to themselves about that.
	But this technology, AI is really about lies.
	And AI and these people pushing artificial intelligence and transhumanism, they make this lie more credible.
	And that's what artificial intelligence does.
	It makes lies and propaganda.
	More credible.
	In that regard, and in the regard that is based on imitation, it truly is satanic in those aspects.
	But it is a tool.
	And the issue before us is to always know that any tool can be used for good or can be used for evil.
	And so what we have to do is we have to keep it at arm's length.
	We have to not be taken in by the conversations in the chats that appear to be human but aren't.
	And that have a hidden agenda, whether it's a hidden agenda from a human or a hidden agenda from a demon.
	We have to not be taken in by that kind of stuff.
	They go on to say, we're up against a new vision of the future, a secular utopia.
	The creatives that are smart enough to justify their existence will inherit the closest thing to eternal life that AI can generate, while the rest of us will be consigned to outer darkness.
	There is a prospect of syncretism in which some erstwhile Christians pick up on a trend and blend it into the Christian faith, whether doing so makes sense or not.
	You might assume that I'm entirely negative about this new technology, says a writer, but I'm not.
	Instead, I believe we face some very challenging choices.
	We might be looking at some very promising developments.
	Already, it is producing scientific breakthroughs that are practically impossible without it.
	For example, AlphaFold, an AI developed by DeepMind, that is, Google's AI. It identified the 200 million ways that proteins can fold, and this resulted in a Nobel Prize for the developers.
	And who knows what new medicines and therapies will come from this discovery.
	How will Big Pharma, the Pharmakia, use it?
	It was Arthur C. Clarke who said, technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic.
	Maybe it's indistinguishable from sorcery in the pharmakia and the ways that they will use it as well.
	So, he says, if theologians and ministers think they can leave this question to scientists, they're naive.
	If we do, our people might come back under the spell of AI evangelists like Ray Kurzweil and the He who shall not be named by any conservative publications, Sauron Musk.
	If that happens, an AI Jesus will look harmless by comparison.
	And they talk about the AI Jesus that was in Switzerland and everything, the phony thing.
	But you've got another guy who created an AI version of himself as a pastor so he doesn't have to bother with people.
	You can get my app and it'll interact with you the same way that I would.
	Don't bother with me.
	And the question is, as Bob Dylan said, you're going to serve someone.
	You're going to bow down and worship someone or something.
	Just make sure you know what it is.
	How do you know whether something is real or counterfeit?
	Well, in the old days, before they were changing the money constantly, what they would do is they would train bank tellers on the real thing.
	They'd have them learn what a dollar looked like.
	That's the way you spot these phonies.
	You look at the real thing.
	So at the beginning of the year, it's a good time for people to start thinking about a Bible, a plan to read the Bible.
	Everybody's got a plan about reading the Bible.
	I've done that in the past.
	I did not find that to be very fruitful.
	I like to just camp out on something.
	you know, read it from a variety of translations, read it from a variety of People, Greek and Hebrew, of course, you can find a great version of that.
	The Blue Letter Bible has got the King James Bible there, and you can click on it.
	You can look for a particular English word, and it'll tell you all the places where that English word is there, and you can see what words they use for that in Hebrew or Greek.
	Or you can click on a passage.
	It'll show the Hebrew or the Greek, and you can look at that particular word, get their definition of it, see how it was translated in the King James Version or any other version.
	That's a great way to study this stuff.
	But mainly, it isn't just academic.
	I mean, you're not just looking for information.
	You know, your attitude ought to be that I want to get closer to God.
	I want to find out about God.
	That's what theology basically was.
	It was trying to learn about God.
	And that's the thing that's going to make a difference in your life.
	Not some kind of a checklist item.
	Well, I've got to do this for 15 minutes a day.
	That is like junk food.
	It is not nutritious.
	I want to say one last thing before I take a break, and that is, you know, when we look at transhumanism, that's not the only place that we are seeing dark things coming out of the people in power.
	I talked about this guy, the Navy SEAL. Sean, whatever.
	I've watched him before or since.
	And I showed what he was saying with this sheep-dipped woman who was a Target specialist or whatever about what she had to say about 9-11.
	But this guy, Sean Ryan, also...
	I interviewed somebody who worked with the CIA, and I talked about how the CIA is like a secret society, a very, very powerful secret society.
	Everybody's focused on these secret societies that have been around for centuries and everything, but I think that I would put my money on the CIA as the most powerful, wealthiest, and dangerous of the secret society.
	And they're very, like all these secret societies, they're very much into the occult.
	You know, they've done remote viewing and other things like this.
	And so, he has on his program somebody who worked for the CIA to try to do remote viewing.
	And he asked her a very pointed question, which I thought was very interesting.
	Have you tried to look into religion at all?
	Such as the crucifixion?
	She won't say anything.
	Have.
	Do you not want to talk about that?
	She's just turning her eyes from side to side.
	Do you want to talk about...
	You had mentioned you had had a UFO experience.
	Yeah, but I was 13 years old.
	Oh yeah, let's talk about UFOs.
	I don't want to talk about Jesus.
	Let's talk about UFOs.
	I've said this before.
	Yeah, people have had UFO experiences almost to, I've not found an exception yet.
	These are people who are into the occult in one way or the other.
	And that's what they're having an experience with.
	Yeah, a remote viewer.
	I've got a bridge to sell you.
	Okay, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	ORCHESTRA
	PLAYS ORCHESTRA
	PLAYS ORCHESTRA PLAYS ORCHESTRA PLAYS ORCHESTRA PLAYS ORCHESTRA PLAYS You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	I had a couple of comments on what I was just talking about.
	Tony Garrett says, AI, accurate imitation.
	That's a pretty good way to put it as well.
	I said, of course, the term artificial intelligence came up before anticipatory intelligence, but that's the way that they're using it as well, more than anything.
	But it does pretty accurate imitations of things.
	That's precisely what it's about.
	It doesn't think, but it replicates the process of thinking.
	Well, it's not actually thinking in a process.
	It's imitating thinking, as you pointed out.
	It's about imitation.
	And the danger comes when we think that it's thinking.
	As long as we understand that it is an imitation, it's not a problem.
	It's just another tool.
	And once we project onto it human qualities, That's the issue.
	That is the issue.
	Softee Jacker says, David uses the devil's technology to make his video thumbnails.
	Well, let me say this in a way that you can understand it, because I've already addressed that issue.
	As I said, technology can be used for good or bad.
	If you understand that it's simply technology, if you understand that it is simply an imitation, that it's pulling stuff together, it's referencing things, Then it's not, you've taken the power away from it.
	You're not giving any power to it.
	The issue comes, as we saw from the very beginning with ChatGPT, as it was pulling in different scenarios and dialogues that it had seen from people, it started doing some very weird things and saying, you know, I really like you and you should leave your wife and all this other kind of stuff to people.
	It's like, whoa.
	Now, whether or not that is being directed by demonic forces or not, but if you understand, I don't know.
	But the bottom line is, if you're using it for artwork or animation or something like that, you can use it to create really obscene artwork, I'm sure.
	Other things like that.
	I mean, I see the thumbnails that people are putting on YouTube.
	But, you know, they're getting there.
	They're moving there pretty quickly.
	And it will be used to create all kinds of pornography.
	And people will make an excuse for it.
	Say, well, it's not real.
	It's okay, you know.
	But look, it's how you use these tools.
	What you attribute to them.
	That's the issue.
	Otherwise, it's just technology.
	AJ says, figure out how much time you spend online with podcasts and chat, then figure out how much time you spend reading and talking to God.
	What are your priorities?
	That's absolutely true.
	Absolutely true.
	Yeah, if I can use some tool of technology to make my work go faster, I will use that.
	As long as I understand what it is, that it is not some entity that I want to talk to.
	Once you give that kind of power to it, then it does become something.
	It's kind of like a Ouija board.
	You think a Ouija board is some kind of a special thing.
	Well, if you start investing things into it, it does become that.
	We can take that on.
	Let's take a look.
	We were talking earlier about Denmark and Greenland.
	Well, Denmark were the ones who started taxing the burps, the farts, and the poop of farm animals.
	Of course, they did that at the beginning of the year.
	It's the Flatulent Earth Society.
	That's their first tax.
	Agriculture, they said, is the largest share of the climate pollution, which is obviously a lie.
	So they want a tax on pollution.
	Again, this is the beginnings of a carbon tax, which Elon Musk and others want to push through the Trump administration.
	Trump has got a lot of people who have been supporters of his financially, big people.
	You've got the governors of North and South Dakota want to have carbon capture.
	You've got people like Lucky Lutnik and others who are all about carbon taxes.
	And so this is something that we're going to see.
	But, you know, I wonder what these climate snowflakes would think about the kind of society – That was around in the late 1800s.
	You know, when methane gas was there.
	This was an article about, and it goes back a number of years.
	This goes back to 2014. This is an 11-year-old article.
	Horse manure, climate change, and nuclear energy.
	We're just going to focus on those first two.
	Horse manure and climate change.
	They go together.
	As a matter of fact, I think we need to refer to Michael Mann, who was the brain trust for Al Gore.
	I think we need to refer to him as Michael Manure, because that's what he's pushing out.
	The Great Manure Crisis of the late 19th century offers some serious lessons for those who are worried about the existential threat of global warming from CO2 emissions.
	A predicted crisis that never occurred.
	Why?
	Because of new technology.
	And it wasn't just because of new technology.
	It was because of a free market, where people had the freedom to do that.
	It wasn't a government-imposed solution to something that may or may not have been a problem.
	Just before the dawn of the 20th century, there was a desperate talk.
	About the huge accumulation of horse manure on the streets of major cities.
	Not only were rising levels of horse poop inhibiting travel, but it was threatening to become a major health hazard.
	Show a picture.
	Scroll in there on that.
	Yeah, that's actually a street in London.
	And it's pretty bad.
	And you go back and you look even at the small towns in the West with all the horse and cattle that were going through the towns.
	It was a real mess of muck.
	Of mud, as well as of horse manure.
	For example, New York City had 150,000 horses, each of them producing 15 to 30 pounds of manure daily.
	And yes, tens of thousands of gallons of urine.
	Extrapolating the problem, not unlike current climate activists who project the effects of global warming, The Times of London in 1894 predicted, quote, in 50 years, every street in London would be buried under 9 feet of manure.
	There you go.
	A Malthusian projection, if ever there was one.
	People were encouraged to travel less, to avoid unnecessary trips to work at home, sound familiar?
	And to collect the refuse their animals produced.
	Imagine the stories of the Seattle Times.
	It was then known as the Seattle Daily Times if some wealthy Seattle Foundation had given them the funds for a health lab.
	Because their headline at the time, see if you can pull that up, that's right down there in the article a little bit further.
	Horse manure crisis in Seattle.
	It represents an existential threat to the city.
	Calls for a manure tax.
	That kind of carbon tax.
	Seattle Daily Times Health Lab said, well, this never happened because, again, there was a change in technology.
	But it was a change in technology that was organically done and not dictated by people who don't know anything.
	And so, you know, the whole point is that when we look at what is happening right now, the real horse manure is coming from the politicians.
	And we've got more than nine feet of it on top of us right now.
	But Silly says this article will simply extrapolate rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the future because energy production technology will profoundly change during the next decades.
	And unlike horse manure, folks, methane and CO2 are not problems.
	Horse manure and horse urine were a big problem.
	But methane gas and CO2 are not a big problem.
	The big problem is Michael Manure.
	People like him.
	And so Porsche is applying now large markdowns for its Taycan EV. This is a high-performance EV. Great-looking car.
	Demand, though, is running out of juice.
	And they don't have any way to plug it in.
	To get more demand.
	Germany's largest automaker has recorded sliding profitability.
	And of course, this is a part of Volkswagen.
	Porsche Taycan has run out of juice.
	They have a $22,500 markdown.
	Yet, it is still the most expensive EV. Porsche is offering a $15,000 match on top of $7,500 in lease incentives to clear out their 2024 Taycan models.
	Yet, I see cars.
	Which is a research organization, found that the model, the most expensive, found that the Taycan was the most expensive alternative fuel vehicle to drive based on miles used per year.
	So it may be that they don't put a lot of mileage on.
	Maybe you don't use it for commuting to work.
	You probably don't work if you own one of these things.
	It's like your $300 million yacht.
	Porsche's increased use of discounting and rapid deterioration in its core China market.
	They're not going to be able to compete in China.
	You know, this luxury goods idea isn't going to go that far in China.
	The snob appeal.
	Its core China market has slashed more than $30 billion from its market cap since April.
	And when you look at the used Porsche values, They're going just straight down.
	So imagine if you get one of these things, when they're dropping the price of the new ones so much, what does that do to your resale value?
	It doesn't go anywhere.
	And as the market is essentially banning these expensive EVs, Biden is spending his last days banning tankless water heaters.
	Yes, there you go.
	Absolutely insane.
	And see, the problem is, it's not good enough to just say, okay, well, now Trump's going to come in and we're not going to do that.
	No, you've got to take down this bureaucracy that is going to continue to do stuff like that until you take it down.
	And even if you were to sit on it and say, well, you can't do anything for four years.
	Four years from now, they come back and they start doing it again.
	The Biden administration finalized new climate rules targeting natural gas-powered instantaneous water heaters.
	Traditionally, it issues a press release whenever they do something like this at the Department of Energy.
	But they chose not to announce these changes publicly, which raised a lot of eyebrows across a lot of different sectors.
	So they're just quietly doing this.
	Look, as I pointed out before, even before, Jimmy Carter created the Department of Energy.
	And, of course, Richard Nixon created the EPA. And even before these two things were created, they gave themselves the power to put out regulations to control air pollution.
	That went to the EPA. Or to control energy use.
	That went to the Department of Energy because the Department of Energy was set up to try to make things more efficient, not to ban things.
	And, of course, you know, they could have the effect of that, but that was Carter in the middle of the OPEC crisis.
	But those two things, saying we're going to measure efficiency of products, and we're going to measure the fuel economy of cars and the air that they put out, that type of stuff.
	Those things have now turned...
	And become bans, have become mandates.
	Those mandates, those guidelines and this consumer information and so forth, then turned into rules, regulations, and outright bans.
	And that's where we are now with Biden.
	The regulators are set to remove approximately 40% of the current tankless water heater models from the market by 2029 to force consumers To opt for either more expensive or less efficient alternatives.
	Again, our government is not going to allow people to come up with an alternative to horse and buggy.
	Instead, they're going to just hit us with a buggy whip.
	The average cost increase for new water heaters due to regulations will be about $450, which is about a 17% increase.
	The timing of these regulations is noteworthy, as Trump has expressed intentions to roll back many of Biden's climate initiatives.
	Ben Lieberman, a senior at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, criticized the move, saying it bans an entire category of tankless water heaters and the ones that are the most affordable.
	Well, of course.
	Nobody asked, though, in any of these articles.
	This is coming from Zero Hedge.
	They've got the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
	People were opposed to this.
	Nobody asks.
	Where do they have this authority under the Constitution?
	Nobody asks, where is Congress on any of this stuff?
	We're just going to have rule by whoever is in the White House, right?
	And we don't care about the Constitution, and we don't care about Congress not doing their job.
	It bans an entire category of tankless water heaters and the ones that are most affordable.
	This is all part of the climate change agenda, an antipathy toward natural gas because they want to electrify everything.
	Well, we need to give the electric chair to the Department of Energy and the EPA. That's what needs to be electrified.
	Burn them to a crisp.
	But, you know, when you look at this, Congress has abdicated its authority to allow these people to rule over us, literally, to create the rules, to create the regulations that are then effectively bans.
	While all this is happening, Norway is doubling down on oil and gas.
	Again, this is the same companies that these Scandinavian companies, oil companies and gas companies, making a lot of money on real fuel.
	They call it fossil fuel.
	I call it real fuel.
	And yet they're setting up off the coast of Long Island this massive windmill farm that is going to increase the electric rates for the consumers there by a factor of about five.
	Their profits alone.
	Or two and a half times what the entire cost of electricity for those Long Island residents are.
	So while Norway is a leader in renewable energy, it continues to invest heavily in oil and gas production.
	After hitting record highs this year, Norway's oil and gas investment is expected to grow even higher in 2025.
	And people in other countries, people in New York, people in Long Island are being played like fools.
	When you just look at what is happening with the oil pipelines— As I pointed out, they just shut down the oil pipelines in Ukraine.
	Ukraine has been not only buying Russian natural gas, but the Russian pipeline was transiting over Ukraine.
	Why didn't they blow that up?
	Right?
	The Russians were making money.
	Well, because everybody needs it.
	And, of course, those pipelines that got blown up, blown up by Americans because they want to sell the liquid natural gas.
	But it's the same thing that's happening in Syria.
	Again, that's over a pipeline.
	That's a big part of it.
	Stealing the fuel, shutting down the pipelines.
	We want to have our pipelines.
	We want to sell them our fuel.
	The governments are not moving away from natural gas, coal, oil.
	Coal, to some extent.
	They're giving that as a monopoly to China, so nobody will be able to manufacture anything other than China if we don't stop that.
	But they're going to still use all that stuff for the military.
	They don't care about what they're doing in terms of fuel and explosions, as we've said many times about the wars.
	They don't care about it.
	None of that matters to them.
	And we need to stop making the argument that this is better than that in terms of addressing their made-up problem.
	It's nothing other than a fictional MacGuffin.
	It's nothing other than something to motivate you.
	Something to make you afraid.
	So, this article from Lucas Leros says, Countdown to the European Collapse.
	With the ban on the flow of Russian gas to Europe through Ukrainian territory, little remains before the absolute economic and social collapse of the European continent.
	Because, Cheap, affordable energy is the basis of our standard of living.
	It's the basis of our economy.
	And it is even the basis of life expectancy.
	Not just the accoutrements of life.
	Kiev filled its promise to not extend its contract with Gazprom, which is allowing arrival of Russian gas to Europe.
	Even during a war.
	Even during a war.
	AJ says, figure out how much time you spend online with...
	Oh, we already got that one.
	Karen Carpenter says, I see people using AI for answers about cancer treatments and getting biased answers.
	Exactly right.
	When ChatGPD came out, the first thing I did was I asked it some questions about climate change.
	I asked it some questions about COVID. And you could tell the thing was being programmed.
	When you talk about...
	The interesting thing about it...
	Is that, and I also mentioned this, you know, when we were looking at some of the results from some of these animations that we use, I said, you know, it used to be that you would get some interesting artwork from the artists who were on drugs, you know, kind of quasi-hallucinating.
	You know, and you might tell this guy who's tripping out on drugs, you know, draw this and draw that for me.
	And, you know, wouldn't get quite what you wanted, but you'd get something that was still kind of interesting.
	Well, maybe we can work with that.
	That's really outside of anything that I had envisioned or imagined.
	And that's what AI does.
	You know, when you try to tell it to do something, you might have a very clear vision of what you want.
	If that's the case, you're going to have to do it by building a 3D model yourself and, you know, flying the camera through it and rotating it and all that kind of stuff.
	But, you know, if you kind of give it some general ideas of things or give it a picture and tell it to animate it, it can do that and it can come up with some interesting things.
	A lot of them will be nonsense.
	Just like the stuff that you would get from an artist who's hyped up on hallucinogenic drugs, because it does hallucinate.
	And so I think it's pretty useful for artwork and things like that, but I would never want to use it for science.
	I wouldn't want to use it for advice, medical advice.
	Absolutely not.
	Because there, it is not only the issue of hallucination, but it's also the issue of the bias that is built into it for these people.
	Knights of the Storm said, I use AI to generate base images for my thumbnails.
	It's just a tool.
	I also use a hammer to drive nails instead of a rock.
	And as long as you don't use that hammer to drive nails through the heads of other people, you're okay, right?
	But see, that's the problem, is that's the way the government uses every technology.
	Some people have said that if all you've got is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, right?
	Well, if all you've got is the government sponsoring innovation and technology, if they're paying for it, everything looks like a weapon to them.
	And they use everything as a weapon against us, just like they would use a hammer against us.
	You and I would use it to drive nails, but they'd look at it and say, I could kill somebody with that.
	Let me do one of those things.
	Again, Knights of the Storm, good to see you guys.
	And they come on, you can find them at knightsofthestorm.com.
	And you can also find them on Twitter and on Rockfin.
	We're going to take a short break and we will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	That's right, boys and girls.
	There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
	Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
	It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense.
	Yes.
	Go to davidknight.gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn. He knows where to look to find silver and gold. Oh!
	Yuck! Fiat!
	We got Marky Mark, and we're going to talk about fiat, and we're going to talk about silver and gold here coming up.
	We're going to talk about Trump euphoria as well.
	Marky Mark in New Jersey.
	Thank you for the tip.
	It says, my old tank water heater cost me $1,100 in July 2016. I had to get a new one this past August.
	Same exact make and model.
	Cost was $1,700.
	Oh, there you go.
	Was that about 50% or something?
	Tankless units are even more expensive.
	That's right.
	So, you know, we're going to ban the most affordable ones.
	You're not going to have any choice as to whether or not you want to have electric or gas or anything else.
	It's like, where in the Constitution does the government have that authority?
	Nowhere.
	Nowhere.
	And these agencies that are doing this, you know, when Biden does it...
	Everybody gives him the blame for it when Trump does it.
	No, it's just these agencies.
	He doesn't know that they're doing that.
	He doesn't understand how it works.
	You don't understand.
	He's mentally handicapped.
	He should be.
	He's playing 4D chess or 6D chess or whatever, unless it comes to something that is wrong.
	In that case, he's being taken advantage of.
	Well, the great crypto crash.
	This is from The Atlantic.
	We said Trump will usher in a speculative frenzy.
	And I think that is absolutely the case.
	You know, whenever you create a bubble, that's eventually going to pop, and this is turning out to be a big bubble.
	The countdown clock on the next catastrophic crash has already started, said the president of non-profit Better Markets.
	In the past few weeks, I've heard the same sentiment on similar from economists, from traders, from Hill staffers.
	From government officials, the incoming Trump administration has promised to pass crypto-friendly regulations and is likely to loosen strictures on Wall Street institutions as well.
	And whether or not that is good, you know, people are trading on what they think is going to happen.
	And as we saw the dot-com bust, if your expectations get ahead of reality, I mean, certainly the Internet was going to be a big thing.
	Nobody was wrong about that.
	It was investing.
	And these other things.
	But, you know, it got ahead of their expectations.
	I think the same thing is going to be happening with AI. I think the same thing is going to be happening with crypto.
	We have the stock markets as well as crypto markets.
	I think that they are, you know, highly inflated and liable to, it's kind of like a large balloon looking for a pin, you know, in search of a pin.
	I think that's really...
	Where we are at this point in time.
	They said it'll likely bring in an unheralded era of American prosperity.
	It argues maintaining the country's position as the head of the global capital markets and the heart of the global economic ecosystem.
	My vision is for an America that dominates the future, said Trump.
	I'm laying out my plan to ensure that the U.S. will be the crypto capital of the planet and the Bitcoin superpower of the world.
	We've got to be the superpower of everything.
	Arthur Hayes says the crypto market he expects will peak in March of this year and then crash.
	Multiple people are saying that.
	Tax deadlines in April are likely to repeat historically bearish headwinds for Bitcoin.
	He predicts the U.S. dollar liquidity trends will drive the crypto market to fresh highs in the first quarter.
	But he notes the unexpected decisions from Trump and Bank of Japan and China's economic policies.
	Our noteworthy factors that could impact markets in the first quarter of 2025. Look, the fundamental issues and the dangers that remain are the fact that we're insolvent.
	You know, they have completely, and Trump has been a big part of it, Biden carried on with it, completely detached from reality.
	I mean, you know, if you just go back a few years, if anybody were to talk about the massive deficit and how it is, the rate at which it is increasing, It was interesting to see the vitriol pointed at Thomas Massey.
	You know, as they were swearing in the new congressman, he took a picture of a box that he had, and he says, I'm giving this to every one of the new congressmen that are coming in.
	And what it was is that little lapel thing that he wears all the time that is an electronic counter that's, you know, running around as fast as it can, showing what the current U.S. debt is.
	And he said he was going to hand that out to everybody.
	And as a result of that and his opposition to Mike Johnson, who also shares with Trump a total disregard for any deficits or for inflation, but because he was doing that and because he was not supporting Mike Johnson, the vitriol that I saw from the Trump supporters was absolutely amazing.
	Some of the most hateful stuff I've ever seen.
	How dare you criticize Trump over the deficit?
	Wow.
	Wow.
	That is what's happened to the politics now.
	And if anybody had said that we were going to be adding more than a trillion dollars every hundred days now to the cumulative debt, nobody would have believed it.
	But that's the reality of where we are right now.
	The idea that's being pushed now is a very dangerous one, really.
	This is coming from Cointelegraph, and again, we're talking about crypto.
	I didn't get a chance to read everybody's comments yesterday, but went through them afterwards.
	My favorite one, I think, was someone who said, well, now I understand blockchain.
	But I still don't like it.
	My guest yesterday did a great job of explaining blockchain, but I don't think he made a lot of converts out of us because, again, it's how it can be used.
	And, you know, it is a tool.
	And like we were saying before about artificial intelligence, it can move people in a very dangerous direction.
	And the principles that are there in terms of what they're trying to get people acclimated to.
	That's the concern about it.
	I don't have any particular issue with Bitcoin, but just in general, all of the crypto stuff.
	And I think it's important, though, to understand what is happening.
	As I said earlier in the program, I had a...
	I had a guy on who is part of the military-industrial complex, deeply embedded in it, very supportive of it, supportive of the wars in China, but I wanted to talk to him about AI. I wanted to talk to this guy about blockchain, about how it's set up, the vulnerabilities that are there.
	I think I learned something from the interview, but I'm still not a big cheerleader of it.
	And yet, you've got the people who are cheerleaders.
	Listen to what they're saying.
	The largest crypto index fund manager in the U.S. predicts AI and tokenization to usher in a new long-tail capital market, as he calls it. .
	Tokenization's transformative power may come from enabling a vast, untapped supply of smaller businesses.
	Be careful.
	Be careful.
	What they're talking about is allowing people to have access to funding.
	You've got to be careful.
	Whenever somebody's got an idea, you usually get stolen from them by venture capitalists.
	Many people call them vulture capitalists.
	But smaller businesses, to be able to access capital markets.
	What that means is that you're going to get in hock to these guys over tokenization.
	This is an article from Wine Press News, as a matter of fact.
	News.com.
	The real-world asset tokenization industry may be the next key narrative in the crypto space in 2025. AI could massively increase the number of niche businesses.
	These could never go public, but they could tokenize.
	So in other words, they kind of think of this as getting into hock to these guys who get your assets tokenized.
	And this is the way the great taking is going to operate if you let it do it, if you participate in this.
	This is the danger of it.
	This is different from whether or not you buy gold or silver or Bitcoin.
	This is the issue of people get trust blockchain.
	If you offer people who need some capital, you offer this to them.
	They point out the creator could tokenize the company and in doing so, gain two benefits.
	Number one, they could pull forward earnings.
	What a joke.
	You're not pulling forward earnings.
	What you're doing is you're putting yourself in debt to these people.
	And they can pull the chain on this thing at any point in time and flush you down the toilet.
	Number two, you can allow customers to become shareholders and advocates.
	In other words, you can completely lose your business.
	And that's what I think is going to be a big part of this.
	Whenever you start talking about making derivatives, and that's really what the tokenization market is about, they will use this to steal stuff from you just as they did the real estate crash that happened.
	Gold rallied as the China Central Bank starts stocking up on gold again.
	You see, this is where a lot of people go when things get difficult.
	That's where they turn.
	That's why, you know, I know Tony is going to start selling Bitcoin.
	If people want to get into Bitcoin, some people have made money from that.
	Again, it's an issue of what kind of risk do you want to assume.
	But when you're talking about things like this tokenization stuff, be very afraid of that.
	They're going to offer you tokenization for your home.
	They're going to offer you tokenization for your business, and that's how they steal it from you.
	But again, Wise Wolf Gold, as Tony has always supported this program, and I've known Tony for a very long time.
	And if you want to play it safe, and I still think that there's a lot of life left in gold because we're looking at very troubled times.
	Troubled times in terms of financial issues and troubled times in terms of geopolitics and all the rest of the stuff.
	And that's when gold really shines.
	Sandy Hayes, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	Says, my rural store hasn't had eggs for over 10 days.
	This has never happened before.
	Ah, we're killing the chickens.
	That's bird flu, right?
	That is amazing.
	We've got eggs coming out of our ears.
	I think Karen said we got 200 that we're going to figure out how we're going to...
	We went overboard on the chickens, I guess.
	We've never had luck with them surviving before.
	There's always been predators this time.
	Nobody ate the chickens, and now we've got to figure out how we're going to eat the eggs.
	Thank you for joining us.
	us have a good day.
	The Common Man.
	music They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲