Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 22, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:00:58

Fri 22Nov24 UNABRIDGED — Russia's Undetectable Missile Demonstrated, Biden & UK Escalate Nevertheless

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	using free speech to free minds you're listening to the David Knight Show
	David Knight Show
	it's Friday, the 22nd of November, year of our Lord 2024. Well, we're going to begin with war, because there is a lot of escalation and interesting things that are happening.
	It's not just the missiles, it's not just the cruise missiles, not even just the landmines.
	We also have a new military base, which is now being threatened by Russia, a military base in Poland.
	So it is escalating very, very rapidly.
	And Biden, in 2007, laid out the impeachment case for Biden in 2024. He also talked about what World War III looks like, and it looks exactly like what he's doing right now.
	So we're going to begin with that.
	We've also got a lot to talk about in terms of Trump's cabinet picks as Gates drops out.
	It begs the question, what was the plan in the first place?
	And there are rumors, very disturbing rumors, about Mike Rogers as the FBI director.
	We'll be talking about all that.
	that we'll be right back yeah as we look at where are we at this point Thomas Massey, a couple of days ago, put out, well, we should impeach Biden.
	He's trying to drag us into a war with Russia, unilaterally.
	We've been drug in one war after the other, unilaterally, by our presidents.
	Will they care if it's Russia?
	I don't think anybody there cares except for Massey.
	Nobody else has talked about it, so I guess he got some pushback.
	So he put up this video from Biden in 2007. But I want to ask you about something you've been involved with.
	You said that if the President of the United States had launched an attack on Iran without congressional approval, that would have been an impeachable offense.
	Do you want to review that comment you made?
	Well, how do you stand on that now?
	Yes, I do.
	I want to stand by that comment I made.
	The reason I made the comment was as a warning.
	The reason I made...
	I don't say those things lightly, Chris.
	You've known me for a long time.
	I was chairman of the Judiciary Committee for 17 years or its ranking member.
	I teach separation of powers and constitutional law.
	This is something I know.
	So I got together and brought a group of constitutional scholars together to write a piece that I'm going to deliver to the whole United States Senate, pointing out the president has no...
	Constitutional authority to take this national war against a country of 70 million people unless we're attacked or unless there is proof that we are about to be attacked.
	And if he does, if he does, I would move to impeach him.
	The House obviously has to do that, but I would lead an effort to impeach him.
	The reason for my doing that, I don't say it lightly.
	I don't say it lightly.
	I say it because they should understand that what they were threatening, what they were saying, what was adding up to be, what looked like to the rest of the world we're about to do, would be the most disastrous thing that could be done at this moment in our history that I can think of.
	Yeah, well, interesting, isn't it?
	Interesting, the cognitive decline, first of all, of Biden.
	That was 2007. And at the time, we were talking about going to war with Iran or whatever, you know, the usual stuff.
	This has been bouncing around for quite some time.
	And that's a very different standard, doesn't he, now?
	Oh, well, let's not go to war with Iran.
	It's a pretty big country.
	Let's do Russia instead.
	Of course, we'll do Iran as well, okay?
	Both of them, right?
	No problem now.
	And China.
	Throw in China as well.
	We are so powerful.
	We're the most powerful nation on Earth.
	We can do whatever we want.
	And we win all of our wars, don't we?
	Well, he talks about what World War III looks like as well.
	And it looks very much like what he's doing right now.
	Ugh!
	The idea, the idea that we're going to send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks and trains going in with American pilots and American crews, just understand, and don't kid yourself, no matter what you all say, that's called World War III. Yeah, that's what he's doing right now.
	He's going to go on planes and tanks and many other weapons that he didn't mention there.
	It's called World War III. Well, violating his own policy, Biden okays anti-personnel mines for Ukraine.
	Determined to, this is Zero Hedge saying, determined to have an even bloodier legacy, Biden has violated his own policy and approved the shipment of anti-personnel mines to Ukraine, said two U.S. officials to the Washington Post.
	Again, Biden showing himself to be what he is always, what I have always seen from him.
	One of the most hateful anti-life people I've ever seen in politics.
	He despises the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
	That's what he fought with Clarence Thomas over with Clarence Thomas' confirmation hearings.
	He didn't care about the Anita Hill thing and the he said, she said stuff that all the rest of the Democrats want him to focus on.
	Because, just looking at that, it's like, I've done a lot worse than that.
	I've slept, not slept, but showered with my daughter and all this other kind of stuff.
	I mean, the accusations, which I don't think were true, about clarence thomas were nothing compared to what biden so he didn't think that's any big deal but he did think it was a big deal that somebody would support the idea of natural rights and that had to be especially in a supreme court judge you're gonna have a supreme court judge that supports natural rights we can't have that so um these uh these mimes We're all about causing civilian injuries and deaths,
	even after the war ends.
	And that's why they are so routinely opposed.
	Yeah, this is a guy who wants abortions for people of every age.
	Every age.
	Just kill them all.
	That's what I say.
	You know, there's a situational ethics.
	That we get to when it is one person or another person, when it is war with somebody we like or for somebody that we like or somebody that we despise.
	We have these situational ethics.
	Zero Hedge says Biden's second intensification of U.S. military support in just the last few days, acting very much like a man whose life in politics and life on Earth are both rapidly nearing their end.
	Hateful, resentful, spiteful, as his life ends.
	In 2022, Biden restored an Obama-era policy that bars America's provision of anti-personnel mines anywhere other than the Korean penicill.
	But we do it there.
	Biden had condemned then-President Trump as being, quote, reckless, unquote, because he got rid of Obama's policy.
	Biden at the time said it will put more civilians at risk of being injured by unexploded mines and it's unnecessary from a military perspective.
	Isn't it interesting how we have these politicians who will tell you the truth and they go out and do the exact opposite of what should be done or they just told you was bad.
	Well, you know, we don't want to take on Iran.
	But we're going to take on Iran and Russia at the same time.
	We don't want to put in all these offensive weapons.
	That would be World War III. Then he does it.
	We don't want to put more civilians at risk with unexploded mines, and it's unnecessary from a military perspective.
	So then he does it.
	Then he does it.
	Now, notice there that we had a policy prohibiting it from Obama that Trump then put in that policy.
	And then Biden criticized him for having that policy.
	And now Biden has put in Trump's policy.
	Now, this is a good example, I think, of blinders that are on people.
	This Zero Hedge article never criticizes Trump for putting that in.
	And they only point out that Trump did it And that Biden criticized him so that they can point to Biden as being a hypocrite.
	Well, he's a hypocrite and he's doing the wrong thing and Trump did the wrong thing as well.
	But they will never say that.
	You see, we have situational ethics.
	You must not criticize Trump.
	You can criticize other people for doing what he did.
	But you can't criticize Trump for doing what you criticize other people for doing.
	And when Trump creates the vaccine, you can criticize the vaccine all you want.
	But you can't connect Trump to it.
	And you can't connect Trump to these landmine policies either.
	We have to have this situational ethics here, right?
	If it's Trump, don't criticize it.
	Well, it is what it is.
	And so we have not only the uni party, but we have the uni evil, don't we?
	They do the same evil stuff, but we've got the press out there, and now Zero Hedge has bought into this as well.
	I've seen one after one, these media organizations lose their credibility as they become Trump cheerleaders.
	Criticize it because it's wrong.
	And they spend this whole article talking about how wrong these landmines are and how they kill civilians.
	But they won't criticize Trump for that.
	It's only when Biden does it.
	Only when Biden restores the Trump policy.
	Then they criticize Biden for that policy.
	They say, now Biden has thrown that sentiment to the wind.
	The idea that it would put more civilians at risk.
	And so has Zero Hedge.
	Because they won't criticize.
	The policy is the thing.
	Stop cheering for one side or the other of this uni-party.
	Stop cheering for one evil or the other.
	If it's evil, and these things are evil, and they spend their whole article talking about how evil it is, but then they won't attach it to Trump.
	Why?
	Money.
	Money.
	Viewers, you criticize Trump, you're done.
	It's the same way that we saw Rosie O'Donnell.
	It says, as Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough.
	She used to like them.
	That's the funny thing.
	She used to watch them.
	I don't really like them until they met with Trump.
	And they said, well, you know, we said, we would like to ask Trump some questions.
	Come on, I'll talk to you.
	And so they go.
	And they come back and they talk about what they said to Trump.
	And one of the things they said was, when we asked him about Matt Gaetz and he went quiet.
	And they said that a couple of days before this happened.
	But when they came back and said they went to see Trump, you had not just Rosie O'Donnell, a lot of people, but she was one of the most vocal.
	I will never watch them again.
	I've heard that over and over again.
	Because I said something about...
	I mean, they didn't support Trump.
	They just talked to him and gave their impressions about it.
	They're reporters.
	That's what they're supposed to do.
	That's how polarized our society is.
	People want confirmation, and they want polarization.
	Don't you even talk to the other side.
	But when the other side's doing evil, they'll point it out, but not when their guy's doing it.
	The Biden-Harris administration had for years refused Zelensky's pleas for anti-personnel mines.
	You talk about somebody who is disgusting.
	That's Zelensky.
	I've never seen this little horn...
	If we're in revelation in time, he's my candidate for the little horn.
	Ukrainians are obviously taking losses and more towns and cities are falling.
	These mines are made specifically for this kind of desperation.
	That's what they said.
	No, they said for this kind of, to combat this.
	It's an act of desperation.
	It's an act of desperation, and it is they're desperate to push us into nuclear war with Russia.
	Ukraine is already among the most mined countries, says Zero Hedge.
	According to Human Rights Watch, and this is what I'm talking about, they spent the rest of this article criticizing, rightfully so, these landmines, but they won't criticize Trump.
	Human Rights Watch says that landmines cover about 30% of Ukraine now.
	It used to be the breadbasket folks of the world.
	Not of the world, but of Europe, certainly.
	Certainly of Russia, okay?
	We've had these situations like the Halamador where Stalin tried to starve them and did starve them.
	But, you know, massive amounts of food grown in that area.
	Now it's growing landmines.
	Growing landmines.
	How many farmers will get killed with that when this all is over?
	An expanse that is about the size of Florida.
	Imagine, Florida covered with landmines.
	As of last February, 1,000 civilian deaths were attributed to landmines.
	By the way, before I move on, think about that.
	Ukraine is three times the size of Florida.
	Pretty large area.
	It's one of the reasons why Russia is having problems with it.
	It's smaller than Iran, though.
	Right?
	Anyway, most of these deadly incidents involved anti-vehicle mines.
	Both Russia and Ukraine have liberally deployed anti-personnel mines.
	And Human Rights Watch condemned Ukraine for using rocket-deployed anti-personnel mines, which litter a territory with small explosive devices, which often come in colors that could invite the curiosity of children.
	And we have seen this over and over again.
	For the longest time.
	Small minds and the kids, oh, that looks kind of like a toy.
	Anti-personnel minds are reviled because of their inability to distinguish between combatants and innocents.
	Hmm.
	Well, that's interesting.
	You know, we all know that aspect of the just war, don't we?
	Everybody knows that.
	You don't have to be a Christian to understand that.
	Everybody understands that if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself.
	And that the attacker is wrong.
	We also have the understanding, because it's even coded in our law, somebody breaks into your house, even if they punch you in the face and attack you and then grab your TV set and start running out with it, you can't shoot them in the back for that now because the threat is over, right?
	And so you can shoot them if they're coming at you to punch you in the face.
	But you can't shoot them when they're running away, even if they've got your TV set under their arm, right?
	Same thing when we talk about it.
	This is just basic morality that all of us are given from God.
	Now, we can ignore that.
	If we ignore it enough, we sear our conscience with a hot iron.
	And we can get to the point where it doesn't bother us anymore.
	We don't think about the fact that we're targeting civilians or starting wars preemptively or any of that other kind of stuff.
	We can sear our consciences individually or collectively as a country.
	And we've done that.
	But still, when you don't try to distinguish between combatants and innocents, that's why we always would have soldiers in uniform.
	It wasn't just so good in a parade, right?
	So that you would understand who the combatants were and you would not harm innocent people.
	But that's all gone by the wayside since World War II. But it is still immoral, right?
	Just because we have become comfortable with it doesn't mean that it isn't wrong.
	Let your conscience be your guide.
	What if you've destroyed your conscience?
	Follow your heart?
	That's so deceptively evil?
	Anyway, Human Rights Watch says it's shocking and devastating development.
	Seeking to allay concerns, one of the U.S. officials described these minds in question of being non-persistent.
	In other words, they said they're going to self-destruct.
	They're going to run out of battery power in a way that will render them harmless.
	Zero Hedge says, civilians better cross their fingers and hope that they're not around when these mines randomly blow up or are made to explode in some other unintended fashion, perhaps as an ex-President Biden is simultaneously sunning on a Delaware beach.
	Biden deserves criticism.
	But what if Trump is sunning on the beach and the minds that he okays out there?
	That was his policy too.
	See, they use it simply for partisan politics.
	And if everything boils down to partisan politics and it isn't about the issue anymore, it isn't about the issue anymore then.
	And the issue will never change.
	Well, we don't know what's going to happen with these things if they run out of battery power.
	Does it need the battery power to detonate?
	Perhaps.
	Could it be detonated some other way?
	We don't know.
	Just trust them.
	Oh, yeah, I trust them.
	Do you?
	You trust these people?
	Do they tell you the truth about anything?
	Europe braces for war as Biden shovels more fuel on the fire.
	Europeans are focused on the very real possibility that the Biden-Harris administration is going to start World War III. On the way out the door, all over the continent, military and civilian authorities are working hard on civil defense preparations and planning for armed conflict with Russia.
	I talked about this the other day.
	I said Sweden, Finland, they're sending out, they set up a website.
	Sweden actually sent out pamphlets.
	That's a little bit smarter.
	Finland put up a website.
	Well, it's not going to be around.
	As a matter of fact, that's one of the reasons why Jack Lawson did the Civil Defense Manual as a double volume.
	And he has sold out right now of the copies of this thing.
	So, keep it in mind.
	It's a great resource.
	But I will say this.
	If you go to his website, CivilDefenseManual.com, you'll be able to see when it's available again.
	But you can also see, for free, two very important chapters on water.
	And also on what happens if you survive a nuclear war, what you need to do to prepare for the radiation and other things like that.
	That's all there.
	And that's there for free.
	And that's what they're handing out in Sweden.
	So you can get that for free at CivilDefensiveManual.com and you can get it in English instead of Swedish or Finnish or something.
	That's a little bit more useful.
	Finland, again, put out a new website.
	Norwegians recently mailed out their own booklet giving people tips on how to prepare for the end of the world.
	So Sweden, Norway, Finland.
	A list of long-life items to keep, such as cans of beans, energy bars, pastas.
	As a matter of fact, what I've had on Jack many times, he said, yeah, look, you don't have to go out and buy storable food.
	It can be very expensive.
	It's nice, but it can be very expensive.
	He said you can just go out and get cans of stuff when it's on sale.
	Start accumulating canned goods.
	And if you don't have any place to put it, put it under your bed.
	Start accumulating that stuff gradually.
	Do a little bit of preparation.
	So you don't have to do everything all at once.
	You can do it gradually.
	The Finnish website says the warning signal is a regularly rising and falling sound that lasts for one minute, used to warn people of an immediate outdoor hazard.
	In the event of a war, the signal is used to alert people about incidents as well as airstrikes.
	Well, I don't know how much time they're going to have.
	Because this new weapon that Russia demonstrated...
	It's hypersonic.
	I don't know.
	They may or may not see it even coming in.
	And we'll talk about that in a moment.
	Why it is not only really fast, but invisible to radar.
	The website also provides detailed guidance on how to try to continue to live in an area that's been irradiated.
	Again, Jack Lawson's CivilDefenseManual.com has it in English.
	And it's for free.
	That particular chapter is up there as an example of the detail that he has in his book.
	A very popular book is why he's sold out.
	That tells you something, doesn't it, about the times that we're in, that the Civil Defense Manual is sold out.
	The Germans are making their own preparations for the coming apocalypse as well.
	The German military is now advising companies on something they call Operations Plan Germany.
	It's a thousand pages long.
	It's classified, but details have begun to leak publicly.
	For example, it lists all buildings and infrastructure facilities to be protected for national security reasons.
	It also is your Walmarts, the main street businesses.
	They're not essential.
	Don't worry about them.
	And seriously, I mean, you know, they'll protect the Walmarts.
	They probably got their FEMA bunkers in there ready to go anyway.
	Provides significant detail on how Germany will transport hundreds of thousands of soldiers east to engage with Russian forces.
	In Prague, a network of Cold War-era bunkers is now seeing renewed interest and so forth.
	However, in the UK, they're rushing headlong into this, trying to get out ahead of Biden even.
	And so they just joined Biden, as I pointed out yesterday, in the escalation, sending in their cruise missiles.
	And that also seemed to be a trigger.
	Seemed to be a trigger.
	By the way, when you wonder if the Senate or Congress is in opposition to any of this stuff.
	The Senate just killed Bernie Sanders' effort to block weapons, more weapons for Israel, because we're going to have escalation everywhere.
	79 senators voted to continue sending weapons to Israel, including, says anti-war Rand Paul.
	Who has opposed U.S. military aid to Ukraine?
	Who has previously joined efforts against weapons transfers to Saudi Arabia that supported its brutal war in Yemen?
	You know the Houthis?
	Houthis?
	I like to call them Houthis.
	They're going to blow up fish with this stuff as well.
	Bernie Sanders said U.S. military aid to Israel was illegal due to U.S. foreign assistance laws that prohibit providing weapons to countries that intentionally block aid.
	Or commit human rights violations.
	And, of course, there's no question that they're blocking the food aid to people there.
	And everybody except the U.S. agrees that there are human rights violations there.
	So, you know, the landmines targeting civilians in Ukraine...
	Israel is clearly in violation of these laws, says Sanders, and under these circumstances it's illegal for the U.S. government to provide them with offensive weapons.
	But, you know, 79% of senators...
	Want to do it anyway.
	Because they don't care about the law.
	They don't care about their own law.
	They don't care about the Constitution they swore to uphold either.
	We're getting back to Russia and this missile thing.
	Russia did not fire an ICBM today, in spite of the fact that Zelensky, as the conservative treehouse was saying, was jumping up and down and shouting about Russia firing an intercontinental ballistic missile.
	Yeah, we got him.
	We got him.
	Now they've stepped over this other line that we had.
	So now we're authorized to escalate again.
	But they didn't.
	Putin decided that his response to the U.S.-led NATO group firing missiles into Russia would be to send a message with a multi-warhead, intermediate-range, hypersonic missile.
	Putin said, quote, one of the newest Russian medium-range missile systems was tested in combat conditions, in this case with a ballistic missile and non-nuclear hypersonic addition.
	The missile has a range of approximately 3,500 kilometers.
	It's about 2,100 miles.
	That is below the threshold for the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty.
	But it still has enough reach to go throughout Western Europe.
	Putin said, you have no Iron Dome system that can prevent this.
	And so, as they've decided that they're going to, first of all, Fire long-range missiles, fire cruise missiles, and then he responds with a hypersonic missile.
	Increasingly, it looks like Great Britain will lead the provocation effort with full support of the U.S. war machine, says a conservative treehouse.
	We previously said to watch Moldova closely, because that strategic position would be the most likely place of Western political influence to provoke Russia.
	Indeed, as things are starting to unfold with increased urgency, stimulated by the U.S. election outcome, now we see the U.K. entering a new agreement for military defense of Moldova being pre-positioned just today.
	There we go.
	The Archduke Ferdinand of Serbia gets hit.
	Let's go, let's start off, that's an excuse for World War I. And now, Moldova.
	Can you find Moldova on the map?
	I can't.
	And I don't want to know where it is.
	And I won't have to know where it is, unless it becomes the trigger point of World War III. This is what our politicians do.
	We have no business in Moldova, and neither do the British.
	A new UK-Moldova defense and security partnership was launched yesterday.
	Building on extensive cooperation between the two countries and strengthening Moldovan resilience against external threats.
	Foreign Secretary David Lammy said...
	That's the U.S. Foreign Secretary.
	Moldova is a vital security partner for the U.K. Sorry, the U.K. Foreign Secretary, which is why to reinforce their resilience against Russian aggression and to keep British streets safe.
	You're not doing anything to help British streets.
	National security is not about keeping British streets safe.
	It's not about keeping American streets safe either.
	That is their label to give them carte blanche to do whatever they wish.
	National security, national security.
	I can't tell you about all the things that I did because that's national security, right?
	All the things that would put me in jail, all the things that would get me in trouble, at least get me fired.
	I can't tell you it's national security.
	So, keeping British streets safe.
	As the design of the strategy appears to be unfolding, Great Britain...
	With U.S. covert operational support will position themselves inside Moldova.
	NATO troops are already on the ground there, much to the anxiety of the average Moldovan.
	The intellectually honest people of Moldova, using the reference point of prior activity by the U.S. and Ukraine, clearly see themselves being set up as cannon fodder for Western military usefulness.
	Going back to 2016, Lindsey Graham in Ukraine.
	Maybe the people of Moldova saw this video.
	I admire the fact that you will fight for your homeland.
	2016 Ukraine.
	Your fight is our fight.
	2017 will be the year of offense.
	2017 will be the year of offense.
	All of us will go back to Washington and we will push the case against Russia.
	Enough of a Russian aggression.
	It is time for them to pay a heavier price.
	Look at how he's rubbing his hands together.
	These guys are not impressed.
	Oh, John McCain.
	That's how old this is.
	Yeah.
	Well, that was 2016. 2017 is going to be the year we go on offense against two.
	Putin against Russia.
	Wait a minute.
	I thought they were the aggressors in 2022. No, five years before that.
	Six years before that.
	Next year.
	We're going against Putin.
	Says Lindsey Graham.
	Says John McCain, who has now gone before God to answer for this stuff.
	He died in 2018. But yeah, people in Moldova, if they look at that, they understand that they're being set up for cannon fodder by the people like Lindsey Graham and John McCain, and there's plenty to take John McCain's place.
	If they can be useful to the West, these people be used that way.
	Great Britain, CIA, NATO appear likely to use the geography of Moldova to provoke Russia into some form of response.
	The UK can then declare their troops under attack, and NATO can respond with a mutual defense of the UK PAC via Moldova.
	BlackRock, by the way, and J.P. Morgan, you know, all wars are banker's wars, right?
	Or hedge fund or trust funds or whatever, you know.
	BlackRock and J.P. Morgan have exclusive rights to the rebuilding of Ukraine with access to all the resources therein.
	Think about that.
	One of the richest areas on earth in terms of minerals and other things like that.
	It's all going to be turned over to BlackRock and J.P. Morgan.
	And all of the money that we're spending to destroy Ukraine, then we'll spend more money for them to rebuild it.
	And they'll have the exclusive monetary rights.
	That's something else that Lindsey Graham just recently talked about.
	They're sitting on 10 to 12 trillion dollars of critical minerals in Ukraine.
	They could be the richest country in all of Europe.
	I don't want to give that money and those assets to Putin to share with China.
	If we help Ukraine now, They can become the best business partner we ever dreamed of.
	That 10 to 12 trillion dollars of critical mineral assets could be used by Ukraine and the West, not given to Putin and China.
	This is a very big deal, how Ukraine ends.
	Let's help them win a war we can't afford to lose.
	Let's find a solution to this war.
	But they're sitting on a gold mine to give Putin 10 or 12 trillion dollars of critical minerals that he will share with China is ridiculous.
	Yeah, we need to share that with BlackRock and JPMorgan.
	They're good guys.
	They're good guys.
	And you should die for BlackRock and JPMorgan.
	You should die for Lindsey Graham.
	You should die for these politicians.
	Trump, Biden, Netanyahu.
	You should die for all of them, right?
	Your life means nothing.
	You're just cannon fodder for these people.
	All these wars are for their agenda, their money.
	Their geopolitical lines, their power, their greed.
	Russia has fired its own hypersonic missile, its new missile.
	They call it the hazelnut tree or something, a Reshnik.
	Putin said it was a combat test of the hypersonic missile.
	They fired it at the Ukrainian city of Dnipropetrovsk, also known as Dnipro or whatever in Ukraine.
	So we've got two different names here that I can't pronounce either one of.
	Because this isn't any of our business, right?
	Americans don't know anything about Ukraine and Russia.
	And we shouldn't be partners there and take one side to the other.
	But it is a regional conflict.
	That's my point.
	We've got two different names for this city.
	Why are there two different names for this city?
	Well, because Russia and Ukraine have been joined together for so long.
	If you go back to the 1300s, that area was called Kiev Rus.
	Then eventually you've got Russia that's created and the Ukraine area that's there.
	But then in the 1760s to 1780s, Catherine the Great in Russia essentially took over Ukraine and became a part of Russia.
	It became a part of Russia as long as America has been around, 1760s to 1780s.
	Ukraine has been a part of Russia.
	Now, it was not a happy thing with the Alamador under Stalin, under the Communists.
	It got really bad.
	But, you know, they had these cultural, linguistic, religious ties, as a matter of fact.
	The Russian Orthodox Church...
	It began in Kiev, and then with the merger of them, and as it grew, they moved the Orthodox Church, moved into Moscow, and now Zelensky has split that off.
	He's not even Christian, he's Jewish, but it's a political move.
	It's simply a political move.
	But these two, this church that had been there, part of their culture, that had been united for many centuries, he split that apart.
	When did Ukraine become independent?
	In 1991. So, you know, going back to 1300, or maybe you want to bring it forward to the 1700s, Ukraine has been a part of Russia until 1991, after the fall of the Soviet Union.
	It got its independence.
	It's been independent since 1991. And so I look at this, and then, of course, we had the CIA coup in 2014, and then civil war because these other people wanted to stay with Russia.
	And so there was a civil war within Ukraine from 2014 on, and it was directed at Russia.
	They were the cannon fodders, the surrogate for all of that.
	See, the problem is, as they talk about this being a domino for Europe, it was never a domino for Europe.
	This is a regional conflict between the Ukrainians and the Russians.
	We have no business there.
	We have no business picking sides in that.
	Just like we have no business picking sides between conflicts of one Arab country versus another Arab country, or the Arabs versus Israel.
	We don't have any business in any of these conflicts.
	None.
	Zero.
	These are regional conflicts.
	We can make them bigger, and that's what they've done.
	So now, instead of this being a conflict between Ukraine and Russia that goes back for, you know, 700 years, This type of, you know, are they in, are they out, that type of...
	It's gone back for 700 years, but now they're going to expand this.
	Because we go over there and we want to go after Putin, like Lindsey Graham said.
	And because we want what is in Ukraine.
	The $10 to $12 trillion of minerals that J.P. Morgan and BlackRock and Lindsey have identified.
	They want that.
	And other resources that are there.
	So they want that.
	They've got their goals monetarily.
	They've got their goals politically.
	And so they're making this a much bigger fight and dragging Europe into it.
	So Putin touted this missile.
	He said, modern air defense systems that exist in the world and anti-missile defenses created by the Americans in Europe cannot intercept such missiles.
	And so, that's what he was demonstrating when he fired that missile.
	Here's the thing, talking about hypersonic missiles, and I think the most interesting part of this is how they are not detectable.
	This is Russia's insane new hypersonic stealth missile.
	The 3M22 Zircon.
	The Zircon is a scramjet-powered maneuvering anti-ship hypersonic cruise missile.
	A distinguishing features of the missile is its ability to maneuver during hypersonic speeds in the sky, and its high speed that also gives it better target penetration characteristics than lighter subsonic cruise missiles.
	The aircraft is powered by a solid-fuel rocket engines that accelerates it to supersonic speeds and a scrimjet motor with liquid fuel in the second stage that accelerates it to a top speed of 11,000 km per hour and an altitude of 92,000 feet with a range of up to 1,500 km.
	As the Zircon flies at hypersonic speeds within the atmosphere, the air pressure in front of it forms a plasma cloud, this in turn absorbs radio wave, to make it a stealth missile.
	Being twice as heavy and almost 11 times as fast as Tomahawk missiles, the Zircon has 9 gigajoules of kinetic energy, or the equivalent of 2150 kilograms of TNT. Yeah, so it's going so fast it has a plasma envelope there at the front of it, which means that it absorbs the radar, which gives it stealth qualities as well as speed.
	And they didn't see it coming.
	Still not sure what hit them.
	And Putin says, you don't have any defenses against this.
	And then they continue to threaten.
	They're not taken back.
	They still don't want to back down.
	Remember, the countdown is gone.
	I mean, Biden wants to get this done on his watch.
	And we've got about 60 days or so.
	Just 62, 63 more days.
	So, Moscow then threatened Poland.
	Oh, so they are!
	Well, no, actually, what happened?
	The reason they're doing that is because there was a new U.S. ballistic missile defense base That was opened up November the 13th, just a little over a week ago.
	They opened up a new U.S. base for defensive ballistic missiles in Poland.
	And that's why the Russian defense spokesperson mentioned that Maria Zakharova said, this is another frankly provocative step in a series of deeply destabilizing actions by the Americans and their allies.
	The foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said.
	She said, this base has been added to the list of priority targets for potential destruction, which if necessary can be executed with a wide range of advanced weapons.
	And so this base was set up to intercept short and intermediate range ballistic weapons.
	It was already there.
	Now, I don't know if it was in the range of where this hypersonic missile went.
	But he's saying, your defenses aren't going to work against this stuff.
	It remains to be seen if these things are going to work with hypersonic.
	If it was within the range of this stuff, then he has shown that these defensive missiles cannot stop the hypersonic missile that he just had.
	And it can contain a nuclear warhead.
	As well as a conventional warhead.
	Moscow said the opening of the new U.S. ballistic missile defense base near the Baltic coast will increase the overall level of nuclear danger.
	And I don't know where that other missile went.
	I don't know what location of it was.
	Could have been far away.
	But anyway.
	Her statement came minutes after Ukraine's Air Force reported that there had been a missile fired.
	And so we have Biden who escalates and sets the rules up so they can fire these long-range missiles into Russia.
	Um And then Putin says, well, we're going to consider that if another country fires, uses, this is a proxy war, even if that proxy country doesn't have nuclear weapons, then we are going to say that we can use nuclear weapons against them.
	And we can use nuclear weapons against the country that is using them as proxy war.
	In other words, we can use nuclear weapons against Ukraine even though they don't have them, and we can use nuclear weapons against America even though they're pretending that this is all being done by the Ukrainians.
	And so after Putin says that...
	The Americans, because it's the Americans who are firing these things, the Americans fire a weapon into Russia.
	Then the British fire their cruise missiles into Russia.
	And then you have a Putin spokesperson say, we have put your defensive missile base on our list to be taken out, and you have no defense against this missile.
	And then they send in their hypersonic missile and everybody's trying to figure, what was that that hit us?
	Don't know what that was.
	This is how it's escalating.
	It's insane.
	I wish they would impeach Biden and shut him down.
	But of course, as Thomas Massey said when he did that, he said, just replace him with somebody.
	He's not the guy in charge anyway.
	I mean, you can see that.
	You can see how...
	Senile he's become.
	Then we have this aspect of it.
	Murky security camera footage out of the central eastern city of Dnipro.
	And again, I don't know where Dnipro is versus where it is relative to Poland.
	I'm ignorant of that, and I don't want to have to learn any of this stuff.
	I don't want to know all about the Mekong Delta either at one point, right?
	Anyway, it showed the moment warheads rained down on a prominent Ukrainian state-owned aerospace and defense manufacturer.
	Experts said the use of an ICBM or a similarly advanced long-range weapon to deliver conventional explosives was very costly, but that it served to illustrate how Moscow could dramatically escalate the conflict.
	And so, the question is, this murky security camera footage that they talk about, I think is this.
	I've seen this, a lot of this on the internet.
	Now again, you know, people put up stuff on the internet and say, well, look at this.
	This is the Russian planes coming in when all this stuff started in 2020. And some of it was really old footage and it was from other places.
	So I don't know if that's what this is or not.
	I don't know what this is.
	But people are putting this up, saying that this is footage of what happened there with that missile.
	I don't know.
	I mean, it's got multiple warheads.
	But again, some people said, well, I think that's being played backwards.
	And so some people put it up backwards.
	And it still was bizarre.
	I don't know what that is.
	Regardless of whether or not that was the test missile that was fired, I have no idea what that is.
	And that underscores the risks that we have with all of this stuff.
	These people are playing with your death and playing with your life and your country.
	And so, you know, I talk a lot about politics.
	I talk a lot about religion.
	It's inevitable that we're going to have honest disagreements with people.
	And, you know, we don't talk about anything controversial, right?
	Just religion and politics.
	So, I had somebody who wrote me a very detailed letter, somebody that has been a long-time listener, very upset with what I had to say about the Israeli war and war with Iran and about the U.S. going to war with Iran.
	Well, let me just make it clear that, you know, because when people talk about Israel, they talk about a lot of different things, right?
	Some people, Israel means like all ethnic Jews.
	That's not how I mean it.
	Some people, it has religious connotations to them.
	For some people, it means, you know, ethnic aspects.
	It means a religious aspect.
	For some people, it's simply just politics.
	You know, you have the ultra-Orthodox Jews, right?
	They are very religious, but they separate political Israel from their religion of Judaism.
	And so, you know, when I say that I hate the American government, it doesn't mean that I hate America or the American people.
	I hate that government in Washington.
	And when I say that I hate the Zionist government, that doesn't mean that I hate the Jewish people ethnically.
	So, you know, there's a distinction between the American government, America, and Americans that are here.
	It has absolutely nothing to do We're the people who founded this country.
	And you know, when we talk about Israel there, and we talk about people look at it in terms of the Old Testament or whatever, that government there has nothing to do with the Old Testament.
	It is, you know, that's Netanyahu.
	I don't like Biden, Trump, Lala, Netanyahu.
	I don't like any of them.
	I don't like the Mossad.
	I don't like CIA. And I will continue to criticize them.
	And so this is not about criticizing everybody of a particular ethnic group.
	I don't have any axe to grind with them any more than I do with Americans when I criticize the American government.
	But he says, as much as I sympathize with your frustration regarding your government's unconstitutional quest to find monsters abroad to slay, and so do the bidding of the billionaires who hold it captive, I find myself unable to comprehend the vehemence you sometimes direct at the state of Israel.
	Well, it's also because the state of Israel, the political state of Israel, is also messing with us.
	They're not just here to get handouts.
	They're here to shut down our First Amendment.
	I hate that.
	Anybody that wants to come after the First Amendment, I'm going to fight them over that.
	Anyway, he says, you also have fairly guarded criticism for Arab Muslim enemies.
	And, you know, we have no business there.
	And I'm not taking sides on that.
	But the Arabs are not telling us that we're going to shut down our First Amendment.
	They've bought a lot of politicians, certainly not as many as Israel has, but they're not telling us that we've got to shut down our First Amendment.
	And so, yeah, that is different.
	But the key thing is that we've got no business there.
	We've got no business taking one side or the other there.
	It's not our fight.
	He said, I get the impression that you're superimposing a woke narrative, which you don't even share, curiously enough, when it is aimed at your own country, a woke narrative of foreign invaders colonizing America's and oppressing the poor Indians along the lines of the 1619 Project.
	Well, yeah, when it comes to the colonizers thing, let me just say this.
	This is the kind of...
	Accusation that you, whenever you criticize Trump, for example, right?
	I've always said, well, you love Biden, don't you?
	You love Kamala.
	Let's see how Kamala does all this stuff.
	It's like, I didn't say I support Kamala.
	I don't say I support Biden.
	I think they're both evil.
	I think the American government is evil, and I think the Israeli government is evil, and I think the Iranian government is evil as well.
	And Hamas.
	There's not any good guys here, folks.
	Why are we picking sides?
	There's no good guys in this fight.
	We ought to be trying to tamp this down.
	Because all the people on all the sides here are evil and they want to kill their own people as well as everybody else.
	That's why we need to speak out.
	There aren't any good guys here.
	And so I'm not on the side of these protesters.
	I don't believe that we need to kill the First Amendment, though, because we have protesters on the side of Palestinians or of Hamas.
	And I think that's a reprehensible response to that.
	And I don't think it should be done, not for a foreign government.
	If somebody wants to protest the actions of a foreign government here, we have a First Amendment, and I will support their right to say that, even as I disagree with what they have to say about it.
	And when it comes to this country, you know, Thanksgiving is coming up next week.
	And, you know, this 1619 project, it's just fan fiction from the left for what they want for their agenda.
	They made this stuff up.
	Look, if you look at what happened with the pilgrims who landed at the Mayflower, they were at peace with the Indians for a couple of generations.
	Then a war began, King Philip's War.
	You can go back and you can, there's different accounts as to how that happened.
	As there always will be, we don't know exactly who started that.
	What we do know is that as you look at our history with the Indians going out west, and I've said this many times when I talk about Russell Means and his book, Where White Men Fear to Tread, and he begins it by saying, the U.S. government has broken every treaty with the American Indians that they've ever made.
	The Constitution is your treaty with the American government, white men, and they're breaking all aspects of it.
	What are you going to do about it?
	And I agree with that.
	I don't support our government's actions of what they did to Indians out west.
	I also understand that there were a lot of incidents where the Indians were the aggressors.
	So it went both ways.
	And, you know, the Indians themselves, some of them were peaceful.
	Some of the tribes were peaceful.
	Some of them were very horrible.
	They engaged in warfare before we ever got here.
	They engaged in slavery before we ever got here.
	Some tribes were good, some were awful.
	I don't support and I've said this many times what Andrew Jackson did to the Cherokee.
	I used it as an example, because I said, even though he was doing the wrong thing, and the Supreme Court said, well, you can do this.
	You can remove them from the land.
	And then when they saw what was happening, and this is a lesson for us to think about as we look at this deportation stuff coming up with Trump.
	In theory, yeah.
	Get rid of them, whatever.
	But then when they saw it in practice, the Supreme Court reversed itself in a year.
	And Andrew Jackson said, well, they've issued their opinion.
	Let's see them enforce it.
	He was right in terms of the authority that he had.
	But his actions were wrong.
	And so, I don't support that either.
	And I don't support reparations.
	And here's the thing.
	We have...
	Here's the deal.
	As Biden would say.
	Here's the deal.
	We got...
	There was a lot of unrest in Oklahoma because somebody said, well, we're going to redraw the boundaries and everything.
	Look...
	The boundaries that we have here in America and other places, we can go back and we look at how they happened.
	They many times were done with violence and war.
	But they're there.
	And if they've been there for a long time, they've been there for decades even, but certainly if they've been there for centuries.
	Let's not start ripping everything up.
	And let's not start penalizing people who came to this country, even after all this stuff happened, or who were born centuries after all this stuff happened.
	That's what reparations is trying to do.
	And I would say the same thing about Israel and Palestine.
	Just leave the boundaries where they are right now.
	Okay, we've had this back-and-forth war, and it hasn't been that long, really.
	But let's just stop the killing.
	How about that?
	Let's stop trying to redraw the lines for the politicians.
	Let's stop trying to do wish fulfillment for these people who do nothing but use us as cannon fodder, their own people as cannon fodder.
	Let's just leave it where it is and let people start to try to get on with their life and let's focus on individual liberty issues.
	And how do we set up a fair system of rule?
	Let's fight about that instead of over the boundaries.
	Let's fight about that instead of reparations.
	And so the first thing he talks about, he's got like three points here.
	He says the treatment of civilians in areas of conflict.
	He said Israel takes abundant precautions prior to bombing an enemy's military position to pinpoint enemy combatants.
	Well, we always hear about surgical strikes, don't we?
	War is not surgery.
	Bombs are not surgery.
	And I don't care how accurate they are.
	They're not surgery.
	And that's why we need to stop it.
	And they'll talk about, we've heard this, oh, we got a surgical strike going in Iraq and whatever.
	No.
	No.
	It's blunt force.
	And then they come back and they say, well, something went wrong, you know.
	And when they blow up a civilian area or hospital, oh, we didn't mean to do that.
	They just got off.
	Of course.
	Well, Which is it?
	If it's a surgical strike, and you've got pinpoint accuracy, the targets that you're blowing up only condemns you when you're coming after refugee camps and other things like that with bombs at a long distance.
	You're not interested in trying to sort out the good guys and bad guys.
	You just want to kill them all.
	And so, I don't buy any of this surgical strike pinpoint stuff.
	These are lies from national security people.
	And we've heard it with every war that happens.
	Every war.
	This is not just Israel and Hamas.
	It's the same lies we hear from our own government whenever they put this stuff out.
	And then he says, and then what about, he says, you know, in terms of civilians, He says, look at the example of the Anglo-American carpet bombing of Dresden, of Hamden, of Hiroshima, and other German and Japanese cities.
	And I have given my position on that, and I have not supported that.
	I have not excused that.
	I have said, and you know, the argument always for the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was, do you realize how many millions of lives we saved of American soldiers and since they were the ones who started it in Pearl Harbor?
	And I know FDR stood down.
	He knew it was coming.
	He wanted to take that first hit as an excuse to come in.
	But they didn't need to do it, right?
	And you can say the same thing.
	You can say, well, yeah, Lindsey Graham and all these people were provoking Russia, but Russia invaded.
	Yeah, they invaded.
	And so they bear responsibility for that.
	And the Japanese bear responsibility for invading, even if FDR took down our defenses.
	They still did it.
	And even if Netanyahu took down the defenses for Hamas on October the 7th, it was still Hamas that invaded.
	And so that is always wrong.
	And it always invites a justified response for that.
	But when we made it a policy, long before we got to the end of this, Dresden and Hamburg and everything, the Germans were bombing London, and they were responding with German cities and that type of thing.
	But...
	And I think as it escalated through World War II, that was a product of superior firepower, as the firepower continued to escalate.
	And so when they dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it was excused by apologists who said, well, it saved the lives of all these American soldiers, Marines, who would have fought island by island to take it back.
	And we were able to end the war.
	And we actually saved lives of Japanese soldiers by doing that, perhaps, as well.
	Well, in a war, you should have dropped the nuclear bomb on the island that you were fighting at that point in time, right?
	Because those are combatants.
	And these are people who had started the war.
	So that would have been justified.
	Instead, they targeted civilian areas.
	See, that's the problem I have with that policy.
	They could have nuked that island, and then if the Japanese did surrender, they nuked the next island.
	And at some point, they realize they're going to keep coming until they get to the Japanese homeland.
	That's the way it should have been done.
	It should have been used as a weapon of war instead of on a civilian population.
	I have a problem with that.
	I also have a problem with the bombing of Dresden, as I've pointed out many times as well.
	And the fact that McNamara, Robert McNamara, when he was talking about trying to make an excuse to excuse his actions in Vietnam for dragging us into that war with a lie, he said in the film The Fog of War, Errol Morris interviewed him shortly before he died, he said if we had lost World War II, we would have been brought up for war crimes for what we did to Dresden.
	And he was saying that, and it was true.
	There are more people who died with the firebombing of Dresden, I believe, than Nagasaki or Hiroshima, but it was of that level.
	Just because it was conventional weapons didn't mean that they didn't kill a lot of civilians.
	But he was saying that because he wanted to redirect attention away from his actions in Vietnam and try to excuse it.
	Secondly, he says, you talk of Palestinians as it being their country.
	He's like, no, I don't.
	I've never said that it is their country or Israel.
	I don't take a position on that.
	These people can fight about it just like the Ukrainians and the Russians can fight about it.
	It's not our business.
	We don't know what is happening there.
	We don't see what is happening there.
	And I only want peace for the people on both sides.
	And that's not what the politicians want on both sides.
	Hamas doesn't want peace.
	Netanyahu doesn't want peace.
	The people there in Gaza want it.
	And I think Israelis want it.
	Jewish people want it.
	I'm not willing to sacrifice anybody's life for the financial aspirations of bankers like BlackRock and J.P. Morgan.
	I'm not willing to sacrifice anybody's life for that.
	And I'm not willing to do it for lines on a map either.
	I don't care about that stuff.
	Third, he says, you regularly cite and endorse Augustine's just war theory, and reluctantly, it seems to me, concede that Israel has a right to defend itself, but then decry the scale of the counterattack on October the 7th.
	No, I don't decry the scale of the counterattack.
	I decry the continuous aspect of it.
	And there's a lot of different components to the just war, as I just said.
	If you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself.
	I'm not a pacifist.
	But you want to try to spare civilian life, which they're not trying to do.
	They're blocking food aid even.
	And then when there's an opportunity for peace, you take that opportunity.
	When you can stop the war, when the hostilities have stopped, then you take that opportunity for peace.
	Just like you don't shoot the guy in the back who came into your house, stole your TV set, maybe punched you.
	You don't shoot him in the back.
	And so the problem I have with what Israel is doing is the fact that it is continuous, that it is targeted to civilians, that's a process of not only continuous bombing, but of starvation.
	And it's about getting the land.
	Everybody sees it.
	Everybody sees it.
	It is just continuous civilian attacks.
	And we understand what their goal is as well.
	Then he says, other double standards could be highlighted in your defense of Hamas and Hezbollah.
	I have never, never Defend it.
	Hamas and Hezbollah.
	I've never defended them.
	I don't take a position on that.
	Now, Gerald Slenty talks about Hezbollah being a militia that fought to get Israel out when they occupied Lebanon.
	I don't know and I don't care.
	I really don't care.
	Stop the war.
	Stop the killing.
	And I think that Hamas and Hezbollah are just as evil as Mossad and Netanyahu.
	By their fruit you will know them, and their fruit is nothing but death.
	He says, from a biblical standpoint, you glibly blush aside evangelical support for the state of Israel as being the fruit of an erroneous eschatology.
	Well, that's been my personal experience with most people that I talk to about this.
	It's because they're Christian Zionists because of their eschatology.
	And we can disagree with that.
	You may have a different opinion as to what that is.
	But again, when we look at this, it's not a double standard on the side of Hamas and Hezbollah versus Israel.
	Not at all.
	I condemn both of their actions as evil.
	And just as we were talking about before, you know, we have people who will criticize landmines and say, look at this, Biden is putting in landmines.
	Isn't he awful?
	He reversed the policy and he criticized Trump for doing that.
	And now he's reversed policies.
	He's a hypocrite and this is an evil policy.
	Well, it was an evil policy when Trump did it.
	And they won't talk about that.
	He goes on to say, my support for the state of Israel is not based on my eschatology, but on the Lord's command to bless Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and the wrath that he has promised to those who curse them.
	And, you know, so I, we have a difference of opinion on this.
	And I have seen a lot of people refer to this, God's promise to Abraham.
	I'll bless those who bless you, and I'll curse those who curse you.
	And through your seed, all nations will be blessed.
	So let me just say briefly, The way I understand that is the way that Paul explained it in Galatians.
	He said he didn't say seeds, but he said seed.
	He didn't necessarily say all your descendants, because if it was all your descendants, we'd be talking about the Arabs blessing us as well, or us blessing them, right?
	So he said, no, the promise was not to Ishmael, it was to Isaac.
	And he said, and furthermore, the promise is to the children of the promise, those who follow God by faith.
	And that's who, he says, all of Israel is not Israel, but those who followed God by faith.
	And he says always there was a national Israel, even in the time when there was, you know, Israel was in the land, they had a king, David, king, Saul, and all the rest of the stuff.
	There was, or even before that, during the Judges.
	It was never all of Israel that was justified.
	It was those who followed the promise.
	And it is those who follow the promise, the children of the promise, the children who follow God.
	That is what I see as Israel.
	And I believe that a lot of people are replacing Jesus Christ.
	And that promise, the seed, that is through Jesus that all nations will be blessed.
	People are replacing Jesus with Israel.
	And I think there's too much of that going on.
	I see that in churches like Hagee's Church in San Antonio.
	I mean, they worship a political entity as much or more than they do the Lord Jesus Christ.
	You know, many Christians need to understand What Christ said when he said, my kingdom is not of this world.
	If it was, then my servants would fight.
	And yet they're fighting over the things of this world.
	They're fighting over the land.
	They're fighting over political divisions and lines.
	And that's not what we are called to do as children of faith.
	And so that's my position on all of this.
	And if God wants to give them the land, He can give them the land.
	He's capable of doing it.
	We don't need to start carpet bombing civilians and starving people in order to get what we think is the promise.
	That's how Abraham wound up with Ishmael, trying to make the promise come true, not understanding how God was going to accomplish that.
	I think at least the ultra-Orthodox understand at least that much of what is happening with all this.
	this.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	A searing girl.
	Zelensky isn't intelligent enough to be the little horn.
	He may end up as one of the horns killed off by the real little horn, just a stooge who's willing to be bought off.
	Yeah.
	He does have a lot of shell corporations set up like Modrioski dolls with his wife in possession of these villas that he's got scattered all over the place and many other assets like that.
	Brian and Deb McCartney say, our youngest son worked with a few Moldovan refugees.
	They're shell-shocked already.
	Young adults in their 20s.
	Wow.
	That's the thing.
	It's just horrible.
	And I hate what we're doing to these people.
	I hate what is happening to the Ukrainians.
	If they're so into this, why is Zelensky having to kidnap people into the military, right, if they really want this fight?
	I didn't see a gung-ho, eager expression on the faces of the people there that Lindsey Graham was talking to in 2016 when he said, we're going to go on the offense in 2017. I think that's maybe one of the reasons why he's rubbing his hands together like a praying mantis.
	Preying on those people.
	APXCOG, thank you so much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	Matthew Lohmeyer talked about this issue with Americans' inability to defend against hypersonic missiles.
	They simply cannot be targeted traveling at speeds over Mach 10. Yeah.
	They can see them, even, right?
	They're coming in super fast, and you can't see them, evidently, because of the plasma stuff that's there.
	McGowan fan.
	David, my brother-in-law, married a Russian woman and he came back from a visit with her family in Kazan, a city that is east of Moscow.
	They were happy with a Trump win, for what it's worth.
	I know that after Trump won in 2017, they renamed a city after him and other things like that.
	They thought, finally, we're going to get a break.
	They took that down.
	A couple of years into it, right?
	But, you know, it was during that time that there was this kind of rapproachment, and we got the interview with Alexander Dugan that I was able to do.
	And I was kind of surprised.
	I mean, you know, his geopolitics, and it's not necessarily, you know, Putin may be more of a pragmatist.
	Alexander Dugan is a real ideologue.
	And I guess I am too.
	We have different ideas as ideologues.
	And I thought it was fascinating how he saw America.
	And it really kind of took me by surprise.
	And it really underscored my belief that, you know, we need to be very careful about these wars because we really don't understand, in many cases, How other people are seeing us, right?
	These cultures are so far apart with languages and all the rest of this stuff.
	And if we understand that there's a lot of things that we don't understand about them and vice versa, they don't understand about us, the opportunity for miscommunication.
	And if we understand with clarity that What the politicians who are running our countries are doing, whether it's Putin or Biden or Trump or Netanyahu or the Ayatollah or whatever, we understand how bad these people are.
	Why would anybody ever fight a war for any of them on either side?
	I don't understand.
	DGA, thank you very much for the tip, says, David, they have the American public so brainwashed into the left-right paradigm that there is no chance for the independent or third party to have a chance.
	The union party will make sure that, well, they also rig the elections as well.
	I mean, they rig the ballot access, right?
	The elections are rigged from the point of ballot access.
	And they can talk all they want to about all the rest of the things that happened downstream.
	But if they're going to pick who's on the ballot, if they're going to pick who's in the debates, even if you get on the ballot, you're not going to be in the debate.
	If they can rig it to that extent, you know, it's rigged that way.
	Sprumford says Dresden was a real holocaust.
	Yeah, it really was.
	It really was.
	12 June 1776. When political Israel comes to your home and kicks you out and takes your house, kills your children, what are you going to do, David?
	Well, that's a rhetorical question, isn't it?
	I think we all know what we would all do.
	And that is also a factor in what is happening there.
	And that's the same type of thing.
	You go back to the American and the Indian conflicts that were happening.
	Sometimes the aggression was on the part of the American government.
	Sometimes the aggression was on the part of an Indian tribe.
	Sometimes it was on the part of a settler or something like that.
	So, you know, it's always difficult to understand where these things are.
	Let's talk a little bit about some of these picks.
	And, of course, Gates is out.
	But I wanted to talk about this yesterday, and I never got around to it.
	Just how incredibly awful Oz is.
	Dr. Oz.
	This guy who was made famous by Oprah Winfrey.
	This guy that Trump dearly loves because Trump supported him.
	And Gard Goldsmith always remembers her name.
	I can never remember her name.
	So you had in the in the 2022 election where Fetterman, the Democrat one.
	On the Republican side, you had Oz.
	You had this guy who has now beaten Casey.
	I forget what his name is.
	He's a Republican millionaire or billionaire.
	But he's a statist.
	And so you had Oz.
	You had this Republican rich guy.
	And then you had a black woman who called him out for both of them going to...
	The World Economic Forum and all the rest of this stuff.
	She was the real conservative.
	She was not the person that Trump picked.
	McCormick, I think, was the guy's name in Pennsylvania that was running for Senate.
	So Trump endorsed Oz.
	And Fetterman even beat him when Fetterman was under a mental fog.
	I mean, he was like Biden when he got elected.
	He's gotten better now.
	I don't really listen to what he has to say, but he can speak coherently now, and I'm glad that he's better.
	His politics haven't improved, really.
	It was amazing that you had somebody who was mentally impaired beat Dr. Oz.
	That's how bad Oz was.
	And everybody knew it.
	But Trump supported him.
	And then when you look at some of the things that Oz has supported...
	High Impact Flicks put this out.
	He said, you know, Trump's new pick, they've had the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS. Dr. Oz has promoted transgender ideology for toddlers, endorsing what he called cutting-edge gender surgeries for kids.
	Oh yeah, state-of-the-art stuff, right?
	Oz gave a platform to transgender children, their parents actually, who changed their gender identities, parents who groomed their children, pediatricians who pushed child transitions, and at least one surgeon who performed transgender surgery even before Bruce Gender broke onto the scene in 2015. Yeah, and you know who else pushed all that stuff before Bruce Gender came along?
	It's Donald Trump.
	He pushed the training stuff in his beauty contest.
	He won it and was open to it, but he wanted somebody like Bruce Jinder to come along and compete.
	But here's Dr. Oz pushing this.
	This is one of the most cringy, disgusting things I've ever seen.
	And he's doing this very, very early on.
	Let's meet a family living with that very question every day.
	Vanessa is here with her daughter Josie.
	Welcome to the show.
	Vanessa, your husband, Joseph, is in the military.
	He's not able to join us today.
	Correct.
	You know, early on, you probably had a sense that Josie was different.
	And when did you recognize that Josie was transgender?
	It was during a regular well-baby exam.
	As a baby.
	As a baby.
	He got really quiet and just sort of watched her for a while.
	And he brought up a term, gender identity disorder.
	Mm-hmm.
	Excuse me, what's that?
	He said, you know, like, transgender.
	I was like, could you spell that for me?
	I had no idea what he was saying.
	Oh, wow, okay.
	That is.
	Whatever you say?
	Good.
	She has a lot of spark to her, I gotta say.
	She does indeed.
	It's a boy.
	Do you remember when your parents thought you were a boy?
	A little bit.
	Talk to me about that a little bit.
	What do you remember?
	Like, how did it make you feel when I used to take you and get your hair cut off at the barber shop on base?
	It made me very angry.
	You did not like your haircut.
	Why not?
	Because I'm a girl, not a boy.
	Yeah.
	Who told her that?
	Yeah, I guess we missed it with Travis.
	He didn't like haircuts either.
	Travis had this huge amount of hair.
	It was unbelievable.
	And of course, you know, Karen didn't want to give him his first haircut.
	And then we had not pediatricians.
	We weren't taking him to a pediatrician, but we had other people.
	Oh, what a pretty little girl.
	It's like time to get his haircut.
	And he was not happy getting his haircut.
	He must have been trans.
	We just didn't know it.
	How about that?
	Isn't that amazing that as a baby, a physician and a mother would say, oh, wow, yeah.
	He's a different sex, different gender.
	Give me a break.
	And he's platforming and pushing that, Dr. Oz.
	And he's going to be at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid stuff.
	What does that say?
	They're the people who decide what's going to be funded, right?
	Do you think that Dr. Oz might fund that kind of stuff for Trump?
	Mm-hmm.
	Dr. Oz also hosted two fathers who had become moms, quote-unquote, discussed a couple's sex life and said it was, quote, wonderful that a child now called her dad to mom, mom squared, pushing every kind of abomination, this guy.
	And then Trump pushing him, of course.
	Shannon Joy says, here is Trump's pick, Dr. Oz, pimping implanted ID chips for humans.
	Because, you know, this is what the globalist establishment wants.
	And just stop and think about the fact that, you know, Trump goes to speak to World Economic Forum just like Dr. Oz.
	And they're all on board with the agenda that the UN and all the rest of these organizations want when it comes to lockdown, the vaccines, digital IDs, all the rest of this stuff.
	The latest breakthroughs.
	Turns out one of the biggest discoveries is actually this tiny.
	See how small that is?
	This little chip may be the next big thing.
	And it sounds like it's right from a sci-fi movie, but people all over the world are implanting these.
	That sounds like Revelation is where it's from.
	So ask my producer Dean to find out more about this cutting edge technology and what it could mean for your health.
	Whether it's our smartphones, our watches, our fitness trackers, or our Bluetooth headphones, it's clear that technology is not just part of our lives, it's running them.
	It's how we buy things, watch things, how we date, stay safe, even how we travel.
	Paul?
	Cool.
	We're so attracted to our devices that they're basically becoming a part of our bodies.
	But what if they really could become a part of our bodies?
	So it's just a natural transition.
	It's natural.
	And it's wonderful.
	Meet the RFID microchips.
	All right.
	Get it right now.
	Available at a store near you.
	...into your wrist.
	Yes, I did say wrist.
	Uses short-range radio frequency identification, similar to the tech used to track your pets or your phone.
	Once implanted in your body, it could identify you as you pass through the airport, open the door to your home.
	It could even be used to buy groceries at the supermarket.
	Now, your driver's license, passport, keys, and wallet are all inside your body, contained in something the size of a grain of rice.
	I know it might sound like sci-fi.
	But it's not.
	10,000 people have already been chipped and the number is growing.
	The possibilities are limitless, especially when it comes to your health.
	Imagine you're rushed to the hospital without any identification.
	You have to have an ID. Doctors know your name, date of birth, medical history, insurance, blood type, allergies.
	And of course, that Center for Medicare and Medicaid, they're going to want that as well.
	For their books.
	And that's why this little RFID microchip is the next big thing.
	All right, yeah.
	And so now he's going to go to Medicare, Medicaid, and we need to have this stuff for our records, right?
	You want to get health care?
	Get the chip.
	That just goes in the wrist.
	Isn't it interesting?
	Just like in Revelation, right?
	Because it says hand, but, you know, when it talks about crucifixion, you know, a lot of people have said, well, they didn't crucify people in their hands because it wouldn't take the stress.
	It would do it in their wrists where the bigger bones are.
	Wrist, hand, you know, interchangeable in the way that they would use it.
	Isaac's army says, yeah, he's made famous by Oprah.
	Hanging out with Marina Abramovic, and of course we saw all this stuff, you know, spirit cooking and all that perverted stuff.
	All the people these guys hang around with, and again, it's Trump as well.
	Hanging around with Jeffrey Epstein, is that any better than hanging around with Maria Abramovic?
	You hang around with him for 10 years.
	Anyway, he says, and I like what he had to say here.
	He says, if pointing this out offends you, you need help.
	That's right.
	If you don't want to hear this, and here's what a lot of people don't want to hear, how he pimped for Operation Warp Speed.
	Jane Ruby put this out, said, yeah, he's a murderer and a prostitute as well.
	As a doctor, even I'm in awe of the incredible advances made in search of a COVID-19 vaccine.
	Never in the history of mankind has a vaccine been developed at this speed.
	But just because we're moving fast doesn't mean we're moving unsafely.
	We're cutting red tape, not cutting corners.
	I trust...
	What a liar.
	As well as a prostitute and a murderer.
	...and you should too.
	That's why I'll be in line when it's my turn to get a vaccine.
	As we speak, cargo planes are carrying doses of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines.
	They're landing all around the country, like near where you live.
	I know what you're thinking.
	Why are they delivering vaccines if they haven't been approved yet, right?
	Well, it's all part of the plan to have everything in place.
	Trust the plan.
	Once the FDA signs up, we are ready to rock.
	It's just sugar water, man.
	Trust the plan.
	I know a lot of you are worried about getting the vaccine.
	I get it.
	I understand.
	Because you think the science is faster than ever, right?
	I want to assure you, the FDA may be cutting out the red tape.
	They are not cutting any corners.
	He's going to be head of CMS under Trump.
	No long-term side effects reported.
	Okay, so I've been vaccinated, right?
	There's a low likelihood...
	They haven't been reported.
	So I'd say there aren't any.
	Yeah.
	The problem, see?
	It just sort of bounces off me.
	Oh, well that proves it.
	Look at all the things you're going to be able to do.
	What a disgusting person.
	Friend of Oprah and Donald Trump.
	Yeah, that's Dr. Jane Ruby put that out.
	Good job with that.
	Yeah, look, it just doesn't go in.
	I've got this liquid that I poured on top of another liquid and it doesn't dissolve into it.
	That's the way it is with COVID and your body after you get vaccinated.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	That's his proof.
	This is unbelievably stupid.
	But these guys are birds of a feather.
	As a club, you ain't in it.
	And we know what club they're in.
	It's the World Economic Forum and all the rest of this stuff.
	Pro-transgender, WEF-tied, Dr. Oz to lead Medicare and Medicaid Services says LifeSite.
	They're on top of this.
	I looked to see, well, you know, what are all the Trump pushers saying about this?
	Well...
	You've got Breitbart who pulls this up, and Breitbart doesn't have anything negative about it.
	Oh, you know, he went to Harvard, and he was a heart surgeon or something or the other, and he won some Emmys and things like that.
	They don't get into the details, but LifeSite does.
	LifeSite does.
	So, they said he's got a history of promoting transgenderism and abortion, and though he's professed to have changed those views in the last years, well, Yeah, they're not tightly held.
	He can do whatever is necessary to get in there.
	You know, he's a Turkish citizen.
	But, you know, if you elected him for Senate, he promised that he would get rid of his Turkish citizenship so he could get access to top-secret documents.
	Which I guess he could then turn over to the Turks as well.
	The position is directly related to important social policy on abortion and transgenderism.
	For example, this government entity formulates the rules relating to insurance plans and what they must cover.
	And under Biden, regulations were issued that forced health care providers to cover transgender drugs and surgeries.
	See, that's how you get this stuff pushed in.
	It's with the money.
	And so, in terms of healthcare, in terms of abortion, transgender, and many other things like that, he's sitting there at the juncture of all the money.
	You see, it was CMS, and I don't know who Trump had in his CMS. I never paid attention to who it was that he had appointed, but I paid attention to what CMS was doing.
	CMS was the one that said, point at somebody and say they've got COVID and we'll give you $13,000, you don't need a test.
	They said, put them on a ventilator, we'll give you $39,000.
	Bingo!
	You've already made $52,000, and the machine only costs $50,000.
	But you get to charge people for the use of it every day until you kill them, which they did to nearly 90% of the people.
	In addition to that, because you're now talking about somebody with COVID, you get a 20% bonus.
	All that stuff, the bribery program of Trump that was the essence of the so-called pandemic, Labeling these people as having COVID, killing them, and then saying they died from COVID because they died with a PCR test that was magnified or with a clinical diagnosis.
	So it was the money that provided the basis for the lie that there was a pandemic.
	And the money came from CMS under Trump.
	That's where he's putting this reprehensible character, Dr. Oz.
	It truly is amazing.
	Oz is a member of the World Economic Forum.
	They named him a Global Leader of Tomorrow.
	At the World Economic Forum in 2002, Oz presented what he called a, quote, health manual for society that he said would touch millions, that's his term, of people who he said had, quote, abdicated responsibility for their own well-being and the overarching needs of society.
	Ooh, wait a minute.
	You're talking about my personal health?
	My personal health doesn't have anything to do with the overarching needs of society.
	But if he's going to hand you Medicare and Medicaid, then he's going to be a nanny over what you do with your life.
	All right?
	That's where the controls come in.
	I gave you money.
	Now here's the strings that I'm going to attach to it.
	And it dovetails really well with what RFK Jr. wants to do.
	Right?
	We're going to make people healthy.
	Okay, well, we're going to require that you do this and that.
	No.
	Public health and the money that is tied to the public health is the issue.
	Dr. Oz, says Billboard Chris, Dr. Oz has been appointed to head Medicare and Medicaid.
	He needs to come out and publicly disavow the abhorrent garbage that he pushed on his show about transgender children.
	Do you remember when your parents thought that you were a boy?
	Has it just played for you?
	He also said, Dr. Oz has said more recently on the Charlie Kirk show.
	Oh, Charlie Kirk.
	This is another one of these guys.
	He wraps himself in Christianity, and then he platforms LGBT people, as a matter of fact, when he's talking about culture wars.
	He puts them out in virtue signals.
	Oh, I'm all about LGBT. And he's all about Christ as well now.
	Isn't that interesting?
	Charlie Kirk.
	Dr. Oz said on Charlie Kirk's show that he's now against the mutilation of minors.
	I want to know exactly where he stands on puberty blockers and on cross-sex hormones.
	I want to know if he still thinks that a boy is a girl.
	I want to know if he will allow insurance to pay for young adults to get cross-sex hormones.
	Thousands upon thousands of 18- and 19-year-old girls are getting testosterone in one 20-minute appointment.
	Who's got that as a new profit center?
	That would be Planned Parenthood.
	Commenting on state abortion bans, Dr. Oz said, And the other thing is this whole thing about heartbeats.
	I mean, there are electrical charges at six weeks, but the heart's not beating.
	If you were to say, starting from when we can hear the heart, like when the heart's really doing something, that would be different.
	But that's not at six weeks, though.
	Well, then in 2019, that's when he said that, in 2019. But here we are five years later, and now he says he's 100% pro-life.
	What does he mean by that?
	It means he's a liar.
	It means that he's a prostitute and a murderer.
	So Trump selects him to head Medicare and Medicaid.
	And as I said before, this is the article now from Breitbart.
	Dr. Oz has been selected by Trump.
	Here's his bio.
	Nothing about the transgender stuff, the abortion stuff.
	The COVID lies.
	The vaccine lies.
	Nothing at all about that from Breitbart.
	No, it's about the Emmys that he won.
	You see?
	It's disgusting to see how these people are such partisan liars.
	I just can't stand it.
	And then, when you look at Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire, or the Daily Caller, Nothing at all about this stuff.
	As a matter of fact, WorldNet Daily InfoWars don't even cover it.
	They didn't mention Oz.
	Because they figure that their people will know about him.
	Let's not talk about Dr. Oz.
	You go to their website, do a search.
	You know?
	The alternative mainstream media will lie to you just like the mainstream media.
	They're no better than CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News.
	They've all lined up into a political party that they've aligned themselves to.
	And they will skew and twist the truth.
	Look, the truth is...
	Nothing but the truth.
	And the whole truth, right?
	They don't tell you the whole truth about these people.
	Yeah, okay, it is true.
	He did win an Emmy or two, right?
	Who cares?
	Is that relevant?
	Is that more relevant for Breitbart than what he wants to do with transgender stuff?
	Because that really is relevant.
	That's really where the money's going to come.
	And that's where they're going to say, well, you know, we want insurance companies to do this.
	We've talked about how the insurance companies are used to get physicians to push these 70-some-odd vaccines on kids.
	Childhood kids.
	Childhood vaccines.
	Childhood kids.
	Anyway, the childhood vaccines.
	They got 70-whatever of these things.
	The way they do that is they say, if you get a certain percentage vaccinated, well, you know, we will give you this amount of money.
	It's the same thing that we saw with the schedule that was released for COVID. You get this many people with the first shot, and we'll give you this much of a bonus per patient.
	If you get a second shot for them, wow, it really goes up per patient.
	You get hundreds of dollars per patient.
	You get the second shot, and you get a high percentage of them.
	And they do the same thing, and it's not just a carrot.
	It's also a stick.
	If the percentage of your...
	Childhood patients, as a pediatrician, if the percentage is too low, they cut you across the board for everything that you do.
	Everything.
	So the insurance and the money stuff, folks, is how they control everything and everybody.
	And it's a very, very important thing.
	What CMS was doing were the $13,000 and the $39,000 and the 20% bonus.
	And it even extended to, if they tell you that your relative died with COVID, And it died from COVID. And you go along with it, they'd give people like $7,000 or something for burial expenses.
	I mean, they bribed everybody to go along with the narrative.
	And that all flowed out of CMS. The money is a thing.
	And that's why this position there with Oz in that money position is so important.
	So Forbes is how Oz could lead Medicare and Medicaid.
	Here's how Trump may change programs.
	And so they talk about the fact that he's right there at the center of the money.
	They said Medicare and Medicaid.
	So Trump and the Republican National Committee vowed in their party platform not to cut Medicare.
	But Oz and Republicans have advocated for Medicare Advantage.
	This is a paid alternative to traditional Medicare coverage that is managed through private insurers.
	It's always, for the Republicans, it's going to be PPP, Public-Private Partnership.
	It's always going to be something.
	That's what Oz has pushed, they said, Medicare Advantage on his show.
	In a 2020 Forbes op-ed piece that he wrote, he wrote this op-ed piece pushing Medicare Advantage coverage to be extended to all Americans not already enrolled in Medicaid, which would be paid for by a 20% increase in Americans' payroll taxes.
	Yeah.
	It's the money, folks.
	It's the carrots and it's the sticks that are out there.
	Well, briefly, you know, with Matt Gaetz, I didn't play this yesterday either.
	I was going to play this.
	I thought it was kind of interesting.
	The left was, especially on The View, we got Sonny Hostin, who was so angry about Matt Gaetz.
	And here's a clip of what she has to say.
	And then less than three minutes later, they come back and she's got this stern look on her face and she's got a letter from ABC's lawyers and they said, you will read this right now.
	Could you nominate someone with allegations of child trafficking across state lines and having sex with a 17-year-old?
	My understanding, further on in the interview, they discussed the fact that once he finds out that she's 17, he stops having sex with her.
	Sonny, you have a legal note.
	I do have a legal note.
	Thank you, Whoopi.
	Matt Gaetz has long denied all allegations, calling the claims, quote, invented, and saying in a statement to ABC News that this false smear following a three-year criminal investigation should be viewed with great skepticism that DOJ investigation was closed with no charges being brought.
	We'll be right back.
	We would not be coming right back if she didn't read this note.
	That only took three minutes for the lawyers to get that out.
	Yeah, as I said before, you know, he was not convicted.
	He was not even indicted.
	And yet, does that mean that he's innocent?
	It means that he's not guilty, but does that mean that he's innocent?
	And so that begs a question, which she began with, actually.
	Why would you nominate somebody like this with a clout on it?
	And that's the question now to me, now that he's dropped out.
	I understood that Matt Gaetz had a lot of enemies, and sometimes he made enemies for the right reasons.
	Coming against this centralized control of Congress that had been established by Nancy Pelosi, furthered on by John Boehner, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And so it was good for them to push back against that with Kevin McCarthy.
	That was a much-needed reform, and he's done some other things that are good.
	Again, we talked about how he was pushing against the establishment for Getting a pardon for Assange, for Snowden, and other people like that.
	So he had some good instincts there.
	But he made a lot of enemies.
	And then there was also the questions about this.
	And I said, regardless of what they do, you know that this stuff is going to be leaked.
	No matter how they tamp this stuff down, it's going to be leaked.
	And so it is going to be this big tabloid back and forth stuff.
	But we've seen that before.
	Like I said before, we had the Clarence Thomas hearings with Anita Hill and everything.
	Now it's going to be we had Kavanaugh.
	And we're going to have that type of thing now with some of these other people.
	We're going to have it with Pete Hegseth.
	We're going to have it with RFK Jr. It's already beginning.
	And, you know, it's not to say that they're innocent, but all this stuff was there, and we knew it.
	We knew all this stuff about them beforehand.
	And so the question is, did Trump not know?
	When I looked at all this stuff, my take on it, it did take me by surprise.
	It took a lot of people by surprise that he abruptly pulled out yesterday.
	Matt Gaetz did.
	Because you would have to expect that Trump knew all these things about Gates and about RFK Jr. and about Hegseth and so forth as part of the vetting process.
	They knew that this would be brought up.
	And that's why I thought that he was so adamant about recess appointments.
	And as I pointed out, the Vacancy Act from, what was it, 1998 or something?
	I talked about that.
	I said, I think, you know, it looked like Trump had, you know, because everybody knew these backgrounds, you've got to assume that Trump knew it, or the transition team knew it.
	And they decided that they were going to move fast and move early in this transition, and they were going to pick people that, and they picked people that MAGA got very excited about.
	Maybe that was the whole purpose of it.
	Maybe that was the only purpose of it, was just to, you know, feed his base, get them enthusiastic about it.
	But when you look at this, he had already used the Vacancies Act.
	It wasn't just an abstraction that somebody was talking about, but he used it a couple of times, and he used it to a large extent.
	He did not use it to put in any cabinet position things, but he got pretty close to it.
	And there was legal challenges and pushback.
	And so you look at this and say, well, I think he's willing to fight.
	And, you know, maybe he's got a plan.
	Maybe he's willing to fight.
	And maybe the way he's going to fight is through this recess appointments and or the Vacancies Act.
	That was my take on it.
	So I was really surprised when he pulled this thing back.
	Because he had to have known about Matt Gaetz.
	But Matt Gaetz had already gone against Israel, political Israel.
	That may be a part of it.
	Some people suggested that as well.
	But this was on Breitbart just two days ago.
	All Trump nominees are on solid political ground for confirmation.
	Not so much, necessarily.
	The chances that President-elect Donald Trump's nominees are confirmed by the Senate are quite good, according to Jeff Greenfield, a contributing writer at Politico Magazine.
	I'm surprised that Jeff Greenfield is so.
	He must be very, very old.
	He's been around for a long time.
	Greenfield's opinion contradicts the mainstream media's narrative on the confirmation chances of Pete Hegseth and Matt Gaetz and RFK Jr. Big media outlets have been claiming for days, says Breitbart.
	That the three of them have almost zero chance of confirmation.
	Punchbowl News told readers last week, Gates can't get confirmed.
	And that was what Mitch McConnell was saying.
	And in the Senate, you had, you know, you didn't get the MAGA candidate in.
	You got one of the establishment guys, Thune.
	Two of them that were running, they went with Thune.
	Greenfield, he says, a former speechwriter for JFK. That's how old he is.
	Like I said, I'm surprised that he's still alive, let alone writing.
	Politico magazine, he wrote that history supports the confirmation of Trump's nominees, who he characterized as the most unqualified individuals ever to be nominated.
	So he didn't like them, but he thought they were going to win.
	And he gives three reasons.
	He said, well, the last time a nominee was rejected on the floor of the Senate was in 1989. Number two, Trump has consistently demonstrated his capacity to intimidate Republican legislators into doing his bidding.
	Number three, the Republican majority in the next Senate is wholly different from the majority that Trump faced in his first term.
	Well, it looks like he did not have any success at intimidating the Republican legislators this time.
	Even had J.D. Vance shuffling Matt Gaetz from person to person.
	And when they got finished, he says, okay, I'm going to pull out.
	Looks like I don't have a chance.
	The Senate last bucked a cabinet nominee back in 1989 when it voted against Senator John Tower, George H.W. Bush's pick to become defense secretary.
	Tower was staring down accusations of substance abuse and sexual assault.
	Does that sound familiar, they say?
	But again, I thought he would use the recess appointments, the vacancy, things like that.
	Instead, it looks like maybe he just put in some friends and he didn't vet any of this stuff and he's just kind of winging it.
	He did the last time.
	Who knows what's going on with this stuff.
	But really, really some bad picks that we have here.
	It doesn't look like he was wargaming this to any extent whatsoever.
	Matthew Ronson said that chip that Oz was pushing can monitor everything you do and everywhere you go.
	That's right.
	It's like your phone, but let's put it in your body, okay?
	SaviorLife77, thank you for the tip.
	He says, thank you, Mr. Knight, for helping me wake up to the left-wing, right-wing deception.
	Christ is king.
	Yes, that is right.
	That is right.
	Remember that.
	Don't get pulled into their wars, their agenda, their fear.
	We don't have anything to fear.
	That's the good thing.
	And that's why we don't have to.
	Christ is king and his kingdom is not of this world.
	It is within you.
	And they can't do anything about that.
	That's why we don't have to fear about this stuff.
	And Max, Trump said he'd pick Oprah.
	We got the next best thing.
	We got our co-host or her.
	Back in the early 90s, that's right, I remember that.
	That was when he was talking about running for reform, to be the reform candidate.
	He was talking about that.
	It's always about TV and reality stuff, right?
	Oprah asked him on his show if he had run for president right after his trip to Red Square in Moscow, back in the 90s, yeah.
	Yonah Anawodi says, Dr. Oz is the best man to help deliver the new Trump Vax2.
	Boogaloo goo.
	Vax2 boogaloo goo.
	That's right.
	Time for the boogaloo to break out if they do that again.
	Octo spook.
	The number of the chip is 666. You know, it's an interesting thing, too.
	I had a friend who I was talking to the other day.
	He said, you notice how everybody is all fixated on carbon.
	Carbon, carbon, carbon, right?
	And they'll talk about it because they want you to think of it as being dirty, right?
	And I've seen idiots in the press talk about how we've got to eliminate the carbon monoxide that is being given off by humans and everything.
	They don't make a distinction between monoxide and dioxide.
	And usually they will just drop it and just say carbon, because dirty stuff is like coal.
	And he said, you know, if you stop and think about it, we always talk about carbon-14.
	That's a radioactive isotope in it.
	And he said, and I'd never thought of this.
	You know, we have carbon-based life forms.
	And carbon has six electrons, six protons, six neutrons.
	Six, six, six.
	And that is what they want to attribute to humans.
	Everything, oh, well, we've got to eliminate all of that, right?
	I guess 666, the carbon, is the mark of the human.
	I don't know if there's anything to that.
	It's a coincidence, isn't it?
	But I thought it was an interesting coincidence, because everything's got to be attributed, all the carbon stuff has got to be attributed to mankind, and we've got to mark mankind in order to track that 666. So maybe that's it.
	I don't know.
	Syrian girl, I was recently treated at a medical facility by a tech woman with a full Charlie Chan mustache.
	Ha ha ha.
	Wow.
	It broke my heart.
	When she spoke, she had the low, gravelly voice that they get from repeated testosterone.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	Kolimos, will Oz drop his turkey citizenship now?
	I don't think he has to.
	I think, you know, he's in the Turkish military and all the rest of his stuff, but I think, you know, he's not going to be handling top secret documents there, so he doesn't have to, I guess.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, let's continue on with some of the other aspects of what is happening with personnel, because, again, personnel is policy.
	And this one comment came out.
	This is a Christian site.
	It said, Southern Baptist Matt Gaetz withdraws from the Attorney General nomination after teen sex allegations, quote, became a distraction.
	Ha!
	Yeah, we've seen that kind of stuff.
	It's like, okay, well, you know, the pastor gets up and he says, this adulterous affair that I've had, I'm going to resign because it's become a distraction, I guess.
	Matt Gaetz, a former Florida congressman, member of the Southern Baptist Convention, First Baptist Church of Fort Walton Beach, Florida, which drew his name because of this distraction of teen sex.
	They said he was scrutinized by many Christians and non-Christians alike due to allegations stemming from a Department of Justice investigation into whether he had sex with and trafficked a 17-year-old.
	A lot of people are saying, well, he resigned immediately.
	Because he didn't want that ethics thing to continue.
	But of course it is going to continue.
	And it will be released and they're going to continue to come after him.
	But I guess, you know, really for Christians and non-Christians alike, a lot of people had questions about it, even though he was not indicted.
	Certainly not even found guilty.
	But, and again, I think that he...
	My concern was that he was going to be so combative that it would just be seen as a revenge tour.
	But he had some very good instincts in terms of pushing back against the government stepping over the line in terms of prosecutions.
	But this is a big character issue.
	For everybody except for Trump, who hung around with Jeffrey Epstein for a decade.
	I mean, it's like, what?
	Trump's like, what's the big deal?
	I don't know.
	So he's got young girls.
	I got my wife from Jeffrey Epstein.
	Come on.
	Come on, man.
	Here's the deal.
	Gates has been under a cloud of sex and drug allegations and as soon as he was tapped he immediately resigned from Congress.
	Gates will face tough questions during any confirmation hearing and will likely not be confirmed, said Liberty Counsel.
	His immediate resignation raises serious questions as it occurred just two days before the U.S. House Ethics Committee was scheduled to vote to release what was expected to be a damaging report.
	And so...
	When he came out, he says, well, while the momentum was strong, it was clear that my confirmation was unfairly becoming a distraction.
	A distraction.
	So we'll see if the distraction goes away.
	By the way, back to Mehmet Oz, Dr. Jane Ruby, talking about his World Economic Forum and the pandemic and all the rest of this stuff.
	And David Icke retweeted her.
	sarcastically said,
	He knows exactly how the people are going to respond.
	Well, who do you want?
	You know, that type of deal.
	Well, it's not just these three guys, either.
	It's not just Matt Gaetz and Pete Hegseth and RFK Jr. issues.
	There's another, more allegations of sexual abuse.
	And this is from a woman.
	About a woman, I should say.
	Not from a woman, but about a woman.
	Sexual abuse of children.
	This is about Linda McMahon.
	That Trump has picked for the Department of Education.
	And this goes back to when she was there at the world, at the WWE. She and her husband founded it.
	She was CEO of WWE for a while.
	And her husband, Vince McMahon.
	Again, this is something that I know about as much about as Moldova's geography.
	I've never followed wrestling, any of that stuff.
	It is an unknown country to me.
	But she stepped down in 2009 to run for Senate, but she lost in Connecticut in 2010 and 2012. McMahon, who co-chairs Trump's transition team, that's the thing.
	She's a co-chair.
	WWE. And along with Lucky Lutnik.
	Who pushes ESG. Who was so lucky to avoid going to work that day on 9-11.
	And again, you know, pushing ESG. Tether and stablecoins and ESG and all the rest of the stuff.
	That's the other thing that's coming from the Trump people.
	She stepped down in 2009, run for Senate, but she lost in 2010 and also in 2012. Co-chairs the transition team.
	He then confirmed her as education secretary.
	The suit alleges that McMahon and her husband...
	And also, the WWE and a holding company there, the parent company, knowingly allowed an employee, Melvin Phillips Jr., to use his position as ringside announcer to sexually exploit children.
	The filing alleges that Phillips would recruit children to work as ring boys.
	helping him to set up and take down wrestling rings at WWE events.
	However, the job was a guise for sexually exploiting the children, which Philip would do in front of wrestlers and executives in the locker area, the lawsuit alleges.
	He would also often film his sexual abuse, according to this filing.
	Now, this filing was not done in response to the Trump victory.
	This lawsuit was filed back in October.
	And so the question is, why did they not know that?
	And they're going to be talking about that.
	Of course, they deny it.
	But still, that's something that you would think that the transition team would be looking at.
	Oh, wait, she was the co-founder of the – she was the co-head of the transition team.
	So I guess that's why they didn't pay any attention to it.
	So Phillips lured, according to the lawsuit, the alleged abuse.
	These John Does said that they were ages 13 to 15 when he met and recruited them to work as ring boys.
	Each of them say that they suffered mental and emotional abuse as a result of the alleged abuse.
	Phillips lured and manipulated the young boys with promises of meeting famous wrestlers and attending the highly popular wrestling shows.
	Experiences that were otherwise unattainable for these kids, said the lawsuit.
	The McMahons, WWE, and the holding company allowed Phillips and others to engage in and foster...
	The WWE's rampant culture of sexual abuse.
	The lawsuit claims that they were negligent as employers.
	Okay, so you can say that they hired this guy.
	You could say in their defense they didn't know what he was doing.
	However, he worked for them in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s.
	He was a prominent ringside announcer and a crew chief.
	So he's not just somebody who's kind of in the background.
	He's got a leadership role here.
	He died, by the way, in 2012. Both Linda and Vince McMahon were aware of Phillips' abuse as a lawsuit.
	Vince McMahon admitted that he and Linda were aware as early as the early to mid-1980s, and again, he worked until the 90s, through the 90s, that Phillips had a, quote, peculiar and unnatural interest, unquote, in young boys, according to this lawsuit.
	He has a peculiar and unnatural interest in young.
	It's kind of like what Trump said about his best friend forever, Jeffrey Epstein.
	He likes them young.
	No problem.
	I'll hang around with him for 10 years.
	The attorney for Linda McMahon called the allegations false and said this civil lawsuit based upon 30-plus-year-old allegations is filled with scurrilous lies, exaggerations, and misrepresentations regarding Linda McMahon.
	Ms. McMahon will vigorously defend against this baseless lawsuit and without doubt, ultimately succeed.
	But here's the issue.
	It's not just what they said, but it's also when they knew this and when they said that.
	And then the fact that in 1988, the McMahons fired him after allegations about him sexually exploiting children continued to surface, according to the lawsuit.
	Well, if that had been all that had happened, then that would be, say, well, that could happen in any big organization.
	But then they rehired him six weeks later on the condition that he steer clear from kids.
	Ah, now that's the issue.
	However, he didn't, of course.
	Pedophiles never do.
	He continually sexually exploited young boys with their knowledge, says the lawsuit.
	Now, if they knew about this, they fired him, they'd bring him back six weeks later and say, don't do that anymore.
	Yeah, I think they probably did.
	After decades of suffering and silence from the childhood trauma, these survivors have come forward to hold the defendants accountable for their conduct and allowing the systemic and pervasive abuse by Phillips.
	I think she's perfect for the Department of Education, don't you?
	In 2023, the Maryland Child Victims Act repealed the statute of limitations in certain child sexual abuse civil lawsuits.
	It became law in 2023. See, that's the issue.
	You know, we look at the statute of limitations.
	One of the shortest statute of limitations out there for pedophilia.
	And, you know, we've had temporary restrictions for some of these cases in Maryland.
	They made it permanent.
	That's why this is coming to light now at this point.
	And again, when you look at this, and, you know, when you have the short statute of limitations, children don't typically bring these charges up.
	Children don't even want to acknowledge that it happened in most cases.
	It takes a very long time for them to come to grips with what happened and to do something about it.
	And when you're talking about getting somebody convicted for something or in a lawsuit, when something is decades old, it's really hard to do that.
	But they are not content to leave it at that.
	They want to keep a short statute of limitations, typically.
	Just like I talk about all the time, Dennis Hastert, who was a wrestling coach and a pedophile, and the Republicans picked him to run for Congress.
	And then all these allegations of things that happened, and when he was being blackmailed decades later, and they caught him taking his money out without trying to avoid questions about that, and they sent him to jail for that.
	And I said, what they need to do is they need to get rid of the statute of limitations, and then they can send him to jail for the real crime.
	They sent him to jail for something that was not a crime, and they didn't send him to jail long enough.
	But it's the statute of limitations.
	And to me, it tells you everything that you need to know about how fully on board our politicians are with this pedophile agenda.
	They're not out there fighting pedophile rings.
	If they cared about pedophilia, the first thing they would do is get rid of the statute of limitations.
	Now, in Maryland, they did.
	Linda McMahon worked in Trump's first cabinet as the administrator of the Small Business Administration before she stepped down in 2019. I said the other day, oh, so she was the one who was running this PPP thing.
	No, she got she got out of it before the covid thing happened.
	So that's not on her watch.
	Allegations of sex trafficking and abuse have followed Vince McMahon for some time.
	In 2023, Vince McMahon paid a multimillion dollar settlement to a former employee who accused him of rape.
	And he stepped down that this year as executive chairman of the holding company following allegations of sexual assault and trafficking.
	But he has denied the allegations.
	Most recently, Vince McMahon is a subject in a federal criminal investigation and a separate lawsuit in federal court in Connecticut.
	I wonder why it is that we can't find people who have character, who are honest.
	We always have to find these bottom-dwelling scumbags because they're being appointed by other bottom-dwelling scumbags like Donald Trump.
	That's why people of no moral character are going to flock together with other people like that, just like he flocked together with...
	Jeffrey Epstein.
	But now, you know, as we see this crash and burn of Matt Gaetz, who saw that coming, right?
	Everybody apparently, except for Donald Trump, who apparently had no plan.
	But now it gets worse.
	You know, not only do we have awful picks like Marco Rubio, but now there's rumors out there that Mike Rogers, Mike Rogers, will be Trump's new FBI director.
	This is a guy, and Daily Caller did a deep dive on all this stuff.
	Mike Rogers is the guy who was running all of this Russiagate stuff.
	He had connections to Hillary Clinton.
	He had connections to James Clapper and all of these people.
	It's like, what is Trump doing?
	This is like having Hillary be appointed Secretary of State again.
	It's like, what in the world is he doing?
	Does he know any of this?
	Rogers, the former chair of the House Intelligence Committee, is a leading contender to replace Christopher Wray as head of the FBI. He served as a Republican representative from Michigan until January of 2015, when he transitioned to media work and hosted a CNN program called Declassified, which focused on American intelligence issues.
	He's worked with various groups, That were friendly with the intelligence community and which perpetrated the Russiagate scandal against Trump.
	You know, it was Truman who said to the FBI, they're trending towards the Gestapo.
	I guess it's never more true than now, is it?
	If it's Mike Rogers, they're already there at the Gestapo.
	Rogers ran for Senate in 2024, and he narrowly lost.
	While he attended Trump's campaign rallies and even received Trump's endorsement, Rogers was not always a stalwart supporter.
	It was an advisor to a group that promoted the Russian election interference narrative.
	At the height of Russiagate in 2017, an organization called the German Marshall Fund, GMF, launched the Alliance for Securing Democracy.
	To tackle alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.
	That organization, the ASD, was spearheaded by Laura Rosenberger, a former foreign policy advisor to Hillary Clinton, during her 2016 presidential campaign, according to GMF, the German Marshall Fund.
	ASD established an advisory council that included neoconservative Never Trumper Bill Kristol, And Biden National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan.
	This is a guy.
	Bill Kristol, Jake Sullivan, Hillary Clinton.
	And then these people are the core of this Russiagate thing.
	And now there's, at least there's still rumors, it hasn't been announced yet, rumors of Trump appointing him as head of the FBI. So Rogers was one of the advisors who worked directly alongside these people in that organization.
	The GMF is funded by various left-wing groups, including George Soros' Open Society, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Brookings Institute, and Google.
	ASD's main donors in 2023 were the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, The Clareman Family Foundation, the Sandler Foundation, and the Bernard and Annie Spitzer Charitable Trust Influence Watch described all of these foundations as either left of center or major donors to left of center nonprofits.
	The Rogers-Advised ASD launched the Hamilton 68 dashboard to, quote, track Russian influence operations, specifically 600 Twitter accounts.
	that were linked to russian influence efforts online they said this project was the basis for many news reports of alleged russian influence including articles by the washington post which later had to issue corrections matt taibbi called the project a scam in his twitter file reporting he said hamilton 68 never released the list claiming that the russians will simply shut the accounts down he said
	all those reporters and tv personalities making claims about russian bots never really knew what they were describing me.
	But he said they were falsely accusing a bunch of legitimate right-leaning accounts of being Russian bots.
	And so, you know, when you look at all this kind of stuff, I got a call out of the blue from Matt Taibbi.
	A couple years ago, right after the show started.
	And it was after I'd been kicked off of PayPal.
	And I talked to him about that.
	And I thought, how did he find my name?
	And this is as he's going through the Twitter files.
	And I was thinking about that this morning as I looked at it.
	I thought, huh.
	Maybe I wasn't.
	I don't know if I was.
	I didn't ask.
	I should have asked him.
	Hey, Matt, did you see my name?
	Because it is really strange that PayPal would just shut me down like they did five months after the show with no reason.
	Like I said many times, I talked two hours to the guy there.
	He said, all I can find is that there's this message.
	You shut this account down now.
	I can't find any reason given for it.
	Well, maybe the reason is then maybe I was in the Twitter files or something.
	Maybe that's why Matt Tybee called me.
	Duh, I should have said something.
	I should have said something about it.
	Who knows?
	WikiLeaks says, Trump FBI head aspirant, former Congressman Mike Rogers, was co-founder of Deep State Never Trump Group, the Alliance for Securing Democracy.
	He was founded in 2017. He became a central player in efforts to tie Trump and his supporters to Russian interference.
	Rogers met with Trump's transition team about a possible position as FBI director, says Fox News.
	Fox News noted that he was interviewed in 2017 after the dismissal of James Comey from the position, so Trump has considered him in the past as well.
	The Daily Caller contacted Rogers' people and asked if he believes that former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper should still possess a security clearance because he's been very complimentary of Clapper.
	He said wonderful things about James Clapper, the liar.
	Maybe Mike Rogers didn't, I don't know, intentionally say that.
	I mean, he just slipped.
	You know, James Clapper is spying on all Americans, but he didn't do it intentionally.
	And this is happening while you've got GOP congressmen out there saying, these 51 people who lied, you know, they're intelligence veterans and stuff like that, they lied about all this stuff, and they need to have their security clearance removed, especially because they were veterans.
	I mean, they were not actually doing the work, but they retained their security clearance after they left.
	Well, they should have their security clearance removed.
	And Mike Rogers is one of these guys, and yet Trump is talking about putting him in his FBI. He's running the organization that's getting these people to push this narrative, and yet Trump, I mean, is Trump controlled or what?
	It's got him under their control.
	So Rogers worked for James Clapper at Harvard.
	Clapper signed a 2020 letter claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop story had the characteristics of, quote, Russian information operation, unquote.
	He allegedly lied about leaking the Steele dossier to CNN, according to a House Intelligence Committee.
	Clapper came in and brought a level of professionalism to the DNI, says Mike Rogers, and he brought such gravitas to the job.
	Ha!
	I don't think anybody has ever talked about James Clapper having gravitas before.
	This is the guy I've always talked about.
	He's like, this is the guy that you want to play poker with because you could win so much.
	He can't lie with a straight face.
	He brought gravitas to the job and finally ironed out the wrinkles that we thought would never go away, Roger said, during a 2017 panel at Harvard Kennedy School's Institute of Politics.
	Now, it was in 2016. This is four years.
	After Clapper lied about spying on Americans in 2013. And he still had a year to go for the statute of limitations.
	But nobody, not even Rand Paul or Mike Lee or nobody, nobody in the Senate, I mean, you know, they have sent other people to jail for lying to Congress, but they didn't even bring charges against James Clapper.
	I guess he's got too much gravitas.
	Mike Rogers wrote in 2017, November the 12th, So, right about this time, seven years ago, he said, our intelligence community concluded that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election.
	We should expect them to attempt to do so again.
	That's a clear and present danger to our democracy.
	He said that seven years ago, almost to the day.
	And so the question is, is this guy really that stupid?
	If he's really that stupid, would you want him to be a director of the FBI? I don't think he's that stupid.
	I think he's a liar.
	Like the rest of these spies.
	He also co-authored an op-ed piece with former acting CIA director Michael Morrell on Russian cyber operations.
	He posted it in the Washington Post.
	The article cited ASD's project to track Russian influence on social media.
	He said, but to get a sense of the breadth of Russian activity, consider the messaging spread by Kremlin-oriented accounts on Twitter, which cybersecurity and disinformation experts tracked as part of the German Marshall Fund's Alliance for Securing Democracy.
	So the article, again, referring back to all this stuff.
	The FBI, an agency Rogers may soon lead, played a central role in Russian interference investigation.
	The FBI relied on a dossier from Christopher Steele, as we all remember, a former member of British MI6. The Steele dossier, so-called, accused Trump campaign advisor Carter Page and others of conspiring with the Kremlin to influence the 2016 election.
	And Trump even tweeted out, in 2018 now, He tweeted out, he said, our relationship with Russia has never been worse thanks to many years of U.S. foolishness and stupidity and now the rigged witch hunt.
	Mike Rogers replied to that and said, wrong.
	Russia.
	Russia waged continuous and increasingly aggressive cyber attacks against us.
	Russia interfered with our 2016 election.
	Still doing that.
	Okay, on and on.
	Russia annexed the Crimea.
	400 years ago, Mike.
	400 years ago, they annexed it.
	Okay, okay.
	He told the truth, kind of.
	Yeah, it was 400 years ago they annexed it.
	And so, it was Justin Amash.
	Who ran against him for Congress in Michigan.
	And Justin Amash said, My opponent in the Republican primary, Mike Rogers, is one of the chief adversaries of American freedom.
	No one in Congress did more to promote the surveillance state and to assault your rights than Mike Rogers.
	And he posted this video of things that Mike Rogers said.
	Mike Rogers supported the Patriot Act.
	Big supporter of that in 2001. He supported the FISA Amendment Act.
	He voted to extend it.
	Multiple times.
	And here's Mike Rogers in his own words about how much he hates the rule of law.
	And I credit George Bush and his administration for assembling this new intelligence community.
	They passed the Patriot Bill that allows and takes the handcuffs off our intelligence services.
	Policymakers back here use words like...
	Let's put them back in handcuffs.
	...the domestic surveillance program of the NSA. It could be abused.
	We're already seeing pressure on the Patriot Act that maybe we don't need it now.
	Couldn't be further from the truth.
	The bulk telephone metadata program is legal and effective.
	Provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act expire at the end of this month.
	We need to rapidly reauthorize these provisions and we need to work toward making these tools permanent as a part of our arsenal.
	Big problem in U.S. intelligence collection.
	We're the only intelligence service in the world that is forced to go to a court.
	We always joked in the intelligence space, we would love to get one-tenth of what Google has on you.
	I supported these programs when they were classified, and I support these programs today.
	Yeah, well, you know, so did Trump win an election or was he selected by these people?
	This is a guy who, if Trump was on the up and up, this would be the last person he would consider for dog catcher.
	He's talking about putting him in at the FBI. So is he selected?
	Is he in control?
	Who's running the Trump organization?
	Rogers was also involved, of course, with the Aspen Institute.
	Very radical left-wing organization that is there.
	And also a part of MITRE, a military intelligence group that has received millions in funding from the Department of Defense and Homeland Security and the IRS. The IRS. Within the past 12 months.
	MITRE was part, I mean, you know, the IRS has always been about spying on people, really, and getting intelligence on people.
	Now, you know, $80 billion, 80,000 agents, artificial intelligence, they're doing things like MITRE. MITRE is part of the vaccine, was part of the Vaccine Credential Initiative, a consortium that was aimed at creating vaccine passports.
	They called it the Smart Health Card.
	During COVID-19 pandemic.
	I'm telling you, this stuff with the blockchain stuff, these people who, like Oz, pushing the RFID chips, you got people like Lutnik pushing blockchain tracking and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's all coming together.
	It's all coming together.
	Rick Scott predicts that Laura Trump will replace Marco Rubio, that Ron DeSantis will kiss the ring and put the daughter-in-law of Trump in place, who has no qualifications to be there.
	But look, it is all coming together.
	Just take a look at the problems, the obvious problems that they have stuck in our face.
	The wide open border, inviting criminal gangs in, just no patrolling of it whatsoever.
	The in-your-face voter fraud.
	Saying we're going to have foreign citizens voting, but we're not going to have any voter ID whatsoever.
	So open borders, voter fraud, and all the rest of this stuff.
	Pedo grooming.
	They put all these things in your face for a reason.
	Because now what's the solution to all of these things?
	Well, let's take the voting thing first.
	The solution is...
	For voter ID, Trump and the upcoming Department of Government Efficiency, DOGE, are exploring a federal blockchain-based election voting and identification system.
	Oh, need voter ID? Well, let's make it part of the digital ID. Yeah, voter ID is something that we need, but we don't need digital ID. But now, that.
	According to sources familiar with the matter, the system will be built in partnership between X, Cardano, Hyperledger, and Hedra.
	All these guys coming together.
	Lutnik and all these other people.
	They're all coming together.
	Legislation will federally require all states to implement the eVote platform to ensure election integrity across all the United States.
	So, we've got problems with open borders, and we've got problems with voter ID. So, we're going to have E-Verify to make sure you're a citizen before you get a job.
	You've got to get permission from the government.
	We'll have digital ID, and we'll put it on the blockchain for people to be able to vote.
	And this is coming from the big tech people, the crypto people that are now all around Trump.
	And then we'll have, you know, for the open borders, well, we're going to have to have, as Trump has screamed, biometric ID to stop people by land, by air, by sea.
	Biometric ID. Again, digital ID format.
	So we've got to have the solution to all of these problems that the Democrats pushed into our face.
	And now here comes Trump as a savior.
	Well, we'll have a digital ID to get your job.
	Digital ID to vote.
	We'll have a digital ID to travel.
	Oh, and then we need to have, because we've got sexual grooming and things like that, of course a lot of that's happening in the schools, but because of all that happening, some of it on the internet, well, we need to have a digital ID to get on the internet as well.
	Do you see a pattern developing here?
	And then all this is coming against the backdrop of Trump's And of Homan, boasting about how they're going to use the military to deport people.
	Rand Paul had something to say about that.
	The stories all said he would declare an emergency to use the military to remove people.
	I'm not for that.
	I'm not for really most presidential emergencies because they smack of martial rule.
	They smack of no congressional approval.
	They smack of no checks and balances.
	So look, I'm supportive of President Trump.
	I'm supportive of removing...
	I don't want to oppose him.
	Don't come after me.
	...people who have committed crimes.
	But I'm not for the army marching up and down our streets.
	I think it's a terrible image to send the world.
	It's a terrible image for us as citizens.
	And so I hope he will think twice about trying to use an emergency edict to have the army patrolling our country.
	Yeah.
	I understand that.
	I also just, you know, I look logistically.
	It's like, I mean, we just let 20 million people or 50 million people into the country, which is just pure insanity.
	So I can understand why there's this, you know, why some people maybe feel that there's a need for a drastic measure like that.
	Yeah, I'm not opposed to drastic measures.
	I'm not opposed to going all in for this.
	But I would do it in stages.
	The American people will be behind.
	Why don't we stop paying people to come here?
	How about that?
	Because immediately after the people that have committed crimes, the people being released from prisons in Venezuela, the bad people that have been admitted to this country, let's go there and start there.
	There is, to my mind, some question of the housekeeper who's been here 30 years, and I don't see the military putting her in handcuffs and marching her down the street to an encampment.
	I don't really want to see that.
	I would like to see something where...
	And I don't think that person should get to vote either.
	So I think that that person, there might be an in-between solution where if they're already working productively, that we allow them to have a work permit.
	So I would expand, actually, a lot of the idea of work permits for people, but they don't get rewarded with voting.
	And I really think us as conservatives who are supportive of Trump need to caution him about sending the army into our cities.
	Okay, so, you know, again, it was coming from Doge.
	They said, well, we need to have e-vote, and we need to have a blockchain ID in order for people to vote.
	Good thing I don't care about voting anymore.
	I'm going to tell you what you can do with your elections.
	But why doesn't Doge is talking about saving money?
	So rather than creating some new kind of blockchain system and paying for that, why don't they stop paying people to come here on welfare, right?
	Rand doesn't talk about that either.
	I mean, he does have a...
	I don't know about putting the military out there.
	This is not going to be...
	This is going to blow up.
	It's going to backfire.
	Yeah, it will.
	And if somebody's been working here for a while, they can't vote, but they can work.
	Give them a work permit.
	That's a reasonable solution.
	However, isn't it also a reasonable solution to not pay people to come here?
	To say that if you're not a citizen, you don't get any welfare?
	As a matter of fact, you don't get welfare that is better than American citizens get.
	Why doesn't anybody say that?
	Well, because they want to keep this problem going, folks.
	It's not just the Democrats who are trying to create these problems.
	The Democrats will put it in your face so you get good and angry, and you want to have something done about all of this stuff.
	No, they don't want to solve any of these problems.
	None of them.
	They just want to keep these things going.
	And they want to feed that anger.
	Remember, it wasn't just a couple of months ago that Tucker goes and he speaks about how we need to fix everything.
	And we've got to have an angry big daddy who's going to come in and fix everything.
	Allow your two-year-old to smear the contents of his diapers on the living room.
	Oh, we've got trouble right here in River City.
	You're 14 year old at the breakfast table.
	Whoa If you allow your 15 year old daughter to like slam the door of her bedroom and give you the finger you're gonna get more of it Rebuckle your knickerbuckers below the meat.
	It's not good for you, and it's not good for them them.
	No.
	No.
	There has to be a point at which dad comes home.
	Daddy's coming.
	Okay.
	They're ready.
	We want martial law, good and hard.
	Come on.
	Big Daddy.
	Not Big Brother, Big Daddy.
	Yeah, like Tucker.
	Like his crowd.
	No, not vengeful at all.
	Big Daddy loves you.
	So does Big Brother.
	The Ministry of Love.
	behavior please they have to let them know he's gonna have to get to your room right now and think about what you did and when dad gets home you know what he says show me your digital ID you've been a bad little girl and you're getting a vigorous spanking right now oh And no, it's not going to hurt me more than it hurts you.
	No, it's not.
	I'm not going to lie.
	It's going to hurt you a lot more than it hurts me.
	And you earned this.
	You're getting a vigorous spanking because you've been a bad girl.
	And it has to be this way.
	Yes, it must be.
	Ha ha ha ha ha.
	These people are sick.
	They're really sick.
	Don't fall for this stuff, folks.
	Come on.
	So, here's what the mastermind is doing right now.
	Trump, pull this article up.
	Trump is selling limited edition signed MAGA guitars for $10,000 apiece.
	This is his latest thing.
	He may not know who to put up for his cabinet, but he knows what you need in your cabinet.
	You need a manga guitar, signed by Trump.
	Only 1,300 of these things, so if they all get signed by him, that's $1.3 million gross.
	These beautiful guitars feature the iconic phrase, Make America Great Again, inlaid an authentic pearl up the neck of the guitar, and the number 45 on the headstock, signifying President Trump's historic term as president, says the company.
	And they say that it will arrive in time for Christmas.
	The cheapest range of guitars, God bless the USA, will go for $1,000.
	Some that are more pricey are the American Eagle series, which will feature graphics of both American flags and eagles and will cost supporters between $1,250 and $1,500.
	But if you want the real thing, you'll spring for $10,000 and the president will sign it for you.
	So there you go.
	Take one of those $1,500 guitars, and for an additional $8,500, he'll sign it.
	And you can put that in your closet, along with your $399 sneakers, your $100,000 gold watch, your $60 King James Bible that is not...
	People will give you for free because it's not copyrighted.
	And your $100 McDonald's t-shirts.
	Oh, and then your digital NFTs.
	You can't put that into your closet.
	But you can also get the digital NFT trading cards.
	And nearly $1 million worth of Ultra MAGA experiences.
	All there.
	This pathetic, self-serving grifter and actor.
	Very much like Zelensky.
	The guy who now apparently his masters have told him that he needs to get his arch enemy, Mike Rogers, into his administration.
	And maybe he'll do it.
	Who knows?
	Remains to be seen who is really controlling him.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	break.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David.
	Okay, welcome back.
	Let's break down a little bit this Bitcoin dollar stable coin system.
	We talked about this a little bit yesterday when I was talking to Tony Ardoin.
	And we're going to have a completely restructured financial system.
	And the question is, how are they going to impose this on us?
	Will it be done by force and in our face, like Biden and Lala will do it, or will it be done quietly and subtly, behind our back, gradually, first coming in a voluntary way before they mandate it, and then when they mandate it, well, you know, we created the CBDC, but we certainly didn't want to mandate it on anybody as those dastardly Democrats who did.
	The same thing we hear with the vaccine stuff, right?
	Well, you know, Trump created the vaccine.
	It was good to have that, but we didn't want to mandate it on anybody.
	No, it was all set up to be that way as well.
	The Bitcoin dollar system.
	Two main components.
	First being Bitcoin.
	And then, of course, second, privately issued tokenized government debt that operate on blockchains.
	Known as dollar stablecoins.
	And that's where Lucky Lutnik hangs out.
	That's what he's always been working on.
	And when we look at what the plan is, it's not hard to see the contours of it now.
	And we know it's going to be done gradually and voluntarily.
	So at the same time, all this is happening.
	There's just so much that the crypto community has gone as gaga as maga.
	Over Donald Trump now.
	You got this creep that was at the SEC, and he's now resigning.
	It's just one victory after the other for crypto people, and they are so stoked.
	We've got...
	I saw this article just a couple days ago.
	Bitcoin was touching $94,000.
	This morning, when I looked at it, it closed yesterday.
	I don't know what it's doing today, but it was closed yesterday at $97,000.
	And this is all, again...
	The crypto community is so excited about Donald Trump.
	Well, what about gold?
	Well, this is an article from James Hickman.
	He said, it was early January 2020. Weird things were happening in the world.
	But he says, then that got even weirder later in the year.
	He says, I wrote at the time that gold was a very sensible asset to own in such times.
	He said, frankly, at the time, he said, frankly, I don't think anyone can credibly say that they have any idea what's going to happen in the world in 2020. And that's why I own gold.
	Well, you know, I look at this stuff and I can see some contours of some things happening, but we don't know what's going to happen.
	Nobody knows what's going to happen in the world.
	And so I look at it as a kind of wealth insurance.
	He said one of the most ridiculous hysterias in human history gripped the world.
	He said countries were locked down in 2020, shortly after he said that.
	Governments and central banks conjured up trillions of dollars out of thin air to pay people to stay home and not to work.
	How crazy is that?
	I mean, it's 2020. Hindsight is 2020, except nobody has any hindsight of 2020. They've all forgotten what happened in 2020. Put your glasses on.
	Three months later, in mid-April, he said, I wrote again that the Fed's virtually unlimited money printing was going to be very inflationary and encouraged readers to consider gold once again, along with other real assets.
	He said, so my point is to illustrate that I'm not a gold bug, and he puts that in all uppercase.
	He says, I don't hold a fanatical view about gold, that it's the only thing worth owning, and that it is only going to go up.
	But here's the thing, you know, you've probably heard the expression.
	Bears do well, and bulls do well, but pigs go broke, right?
	People who are optimistic, people who are pessimistic, they do well.
	But if you just want to accumulate as much as you can, and when you see the price of something shooting up, And you want to jump on that bandwagon?
	That's how little piggies go broke.
	This little piggy went to the stock market.
	That one went to the other madness of the crowd.
	Gold, he says, is a great insurance policy, a hedge against systemic risk.
	It's great for estate planning and asset protection.
	It holds its value over inflation over a long period of time.
	But more than anything, and he doesn't mention it, it's private.
	It's private.
	He says the real long-term driver of gold demand is still going to be central banks.
	And they're not all that impressed.
	They don't think the world has changed at this point in time.
	I think a lot of foreign central banks, he said, are sitting on the sidelines right now with gold already near its all-time high.
	They've paused their buying spree.
	They're now looking at this incoming administration to see what happens next.
	And so the questions remain.
	So we're looking at, as we look at what is coming, Can Elon trim the federal budget?
	Of course he can't.
	This is a commission that they're putting together, the Doge Commission.
	They can make recommendations, and they can point to the fact that most of the people that work for the federal government are not working full-time anymore.
	They're working from home.
	They think that they can get people to voluntarily quit now if they make them go back to work every day of the week.
	Well, that remains to be seen.
	But I don't know that, you know, how much of this stuff can be done.
	Some of this stuff can be done by the executive branch, by executive order.
	You know, Trump could issue a thing saying you must work in the office, something like that.
	That's been a pet peeve of Elon Musk, too.
	He doesn't like the work from home thing.
	I only work from home.
	Yeah.
	Whatever.
	But, yeah, the problem with working from home is it never stops.
	That can be the case.
	But, no, he wants to make sure that somebody's getting something done.
	Quite frankly, a lot of these people, I'd be willing to continue to pay them if they didn't do their job because their job is the wrong thing to be doing.
	But most of these things that are going to happen from Doge are going to be recommendations, and a lot of them are things that the executive branch can't do and that the congressional branch does not want to do.
	Will there be a U.S. energy renaissance?
	Or an AI-fueled productivity bonanza?
	Will the government become functional once again?
	Will America's unparalleled military superiority be restored?
	Will sensible monetary policy reign in inflation?
	Well, I'm skeptical about all those things.
	I wouldn't even ask those questions.
	You know, will government become functional again?
	I hope not.
	Because it's doing all the wrong things.
	Will government become small enough to fit inside the Constitution is the question.
	Will America's unparalleled military superiority be restored?
	I don't want an American empire.
	I don't want to pay for an American empire.
	I don't want to be drug into every conflict as a policeman of the world.
	So I hope not.
	And then, will the Federal Reserve do sensible monetary policy?
	Why should the Federal Reserve be doing monetary policy?
	This is the system that I want to get out of.
	And I want to get out of that financial system.
	I want to get out of that governmental system.
	And I want to get out of the surveillance system that Elon Musk and Trump and the rest of these people are going to be setting up.
	He said, all of that said, gold is still worth owning because there's still a long-term risk to the U.S. dollar and to the United States itself.
	And so, again, that's his case for it.
	Now, when we look at it, as we said, when I talked to Tony, fundamentals have not really changed.
	There's all this euphoria after the election, especially around crypto.
	And all it takes is one thing that everybody gets really excited about.
	Just take a look at everybody being so excited about AI. And so what does everybody do to play AI? Well, they all jump in and they buy Nvidia stock.
	Now, if something happens to burst their expectations, you can watch that stock bubble that's been built around AI and Nvidia.
	You can watch that evaporate overnight.
	Well, it won't even take that long.
	They'll just instantly pop.
	And I think the same thing is true of crypto.
	If and when Trump does something that is not positive for the crypto market, You're going to see that happen.
	So again, you might be able to make, except I'm not giving you investment advice.
	I'm just telling you how I've been burned in the past.
	Live and learn from my experience.
	You know, the dot-com bust.
	But, you know, when you look at that, have the fundamentals really changed?
	When you jump into something because everybody else is jumping into it, you've got the fear of missing out.
	You know, they're always pushing fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
	And then people have a fear of missing out when there is some kind of a bubble that is happening.
	Just take a look at this.
	Goldman Sachs is saying that the gold in their Sachs is set to hit 3,000 by the year end of 2025. That's next year.
	Where is it right now?
	It's just under 2,700.
	You know, it had gone up to, what, 2,800 or something?
	I don't know, because, like I said, I don't follow the price of gold every day, anxiously looking at it like it was some kind of a stock or like it was crypto or something.
	But, you know, I think day trading like that in anything is a very dangerous thing to do.
	But again, if you look at it as something that's going to get you out of the system, you should own some of it probably because it's just as insurance.
	And you can gradually accumulate it at Tony Arderman's Wise Wolf.
	DavidKnight.Gold will take you there. And you can sign up for Wolfpack, and you can sign up for how much you want to save and set aside as insurance each month. And you can get that in gold and silver. Or you can go there, and you can get gold and silver in any amount. It's a great way to start to have a little bit of insurance for the kind of uncertain times that we are looking at. We're going to take a quick break,
	and we'll be right back. Thank and we'll be right back. Thank
	you. Thank you. Thank
	you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	GeorgiaBoy1142 says, How long before Billy Joe smashes one of those on stage?
	Maybe he'll do that.
	He'll still have the signature on the back of the neck.
	Maybe.
	I don't know.
	Wherever it is.
	Hi, Boost.
	David.
	Hello.
	Trump is playing 16D chess.
	And we have to pick bad people now to show the hands of the rhino.
	It's working so well so far.
	That's right.
	There we are.
	Margie Mark in New Jersey.
	Mike Rogers is Chris Ray 2.0.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Or James Comey 3.0.
	I don't know.
	The more they change, the more they stay the same, right?
	Don't frag me, bro.
	We got pedos protecting pedos.
	That's right.
	Well, Marjorie Taylor Greene was very excited about Matt Gaetz.
	She said that he would prosecute vaccine crimes against humanity.
	Not anymore.
	That's another reason not to have him in there, that they wouldn't vote for him.
	But I seriously doubt that that would have happened.
	Is he really going to?
	Because he would have to have prosecuted his boss.
	I mean, is he going to put Trump in handcuffs and take him out of there?
	He would if he was consistent, right?
	He's the father of the vaccine.
	Why wouldn't he go to jail, MAGA and Marjorie?
	So, yeah, he's going to prosecute vaccine-related crimes against humanity.
	They are crimes against humanity.
	And then she focuses, notice how they always do this, just like Rand Paul.
	She focuses on Fauci.
	Dr. Fauci lied to the American people.
	He abused his power, his position, and his role.
	A very powerful role.
	And paid for by the American tax people, said Marjorie.
	He lied, and many people died.
	And then Trump...
	This one not only gave him power, kept him there, but gave him a medal on his way out the door the last day that Trump was in office.
	How about that?
	Preparing for the next pandemic is actually recognizing that the last pandemic resulted in crimes against humanity, she said.
	So I guess she's not preparing for the next one.
	Because we now got people like Birx is saying wonderful things about RFK Jr. Redfield is saying wonderful things about him.
	Everybody except Fauci is saying wonderful things about RFK Jr. I guess he doesn't like that RFK Jr. wrote a book about him.
	But other than that, this unholy trio that was running all this stuff at the behest of Trump, the two of them like him now.
	And she said, people that are perpetrated and continue to perpetrate these crimes...
	Need to be prosecuted.
	And that needs to be starting in the next administration.
	I'm pretty sure our next Attorney General will do that.
	And I look forward to seeing that happen.
	Well, he's going to have a lot of people to lock up.
	Both parties in both houses of Congress.
	The President who appointed him.
	He won't be doing that.
	GOP Senator...
	Gets shut down on Meet the Press because, in the words of AP, his bonkers vaccine conspiracy.
	Meet the press moderator Kristen Welker.
	Shutdown Senator Mark Wayne Mullen has repeated attempts to peddle a debunked claim that vaccines were linked to autism as he praised RFK Jr.'s nomination.
	Well, again, they aren't going to let anybody say bad things about their corporate sponsors.
	That's why one of the key things that's going to have to be done is to stop this advertising, or that'll never change.
	You're not concerned about RFK Jr. overseeing the largest health agency in our land?
	He says, well, I think that the vaccines should be questioned.
	She said he questioned vaccines.
	He said he thought that might be autism.
	He says, well, I think they should be questioned.
	For instance, why is America the highest country in the world for autism?
	Could it be because we give kids way more vaccines than anybody else?
	He says, what's causing that?
	Is it our diet?
	Is it some of the stuff that we're putting in our children's system?
	It used to be that almost nobody heard of it.
	And then it went from 1 in 10,000, then 1 in 5,000, 1 in 2,000, some races right now, one out of every 36 kids by the age of three has developed some form of autism.
	What is causing that, he said.
	Nobody wants to study it.
	She said, well, there's no scientific evidence for any of that stuff.
	Well, tell her to prove it then.
	Prove it.
	You don't even want to do a study.
	So, obviously, you're not interested in this issue.
	So, why are you so concerned about it?
	So, yeah, this is...
	And then we look at Rand Paul.
	He vows to target the COVID cover-up.
	He wants to go look at the lab in China.
	And that, folks, is a red herring.
	It is something that when people start to get on the trail of the real crime, the vaccine, he takes out this red herring, this stinky fish, and drags it over the trail so the hounds lose the scent.
	That's the purpose of Red Herring Paul.
	That's what we should start calling him instead of Rand.
	He's Red Herring.
	He says, I chose to chair this committee, the Homeland Security Committee, He says, I think we're on the cusp of really beginning to uncover what happened with COVID, he said.
	Hey, pal, we know what happened.
	The jab is the bioweapon.
	Nothing else.
	Well, we do have a former Green Beret who refused the mandatory COVID jab.
	I guess that's why he got kicked out.
	LifeSite News has it.
	They point out he's Catholic.
	He said he's running for Matt Gaetz's house seat.
	Well, it'd be good to have somebody that is there.
	Just as a reminder, vitamin D supplements lower blood pressure in older adults with obesity, they say.
	And they said taking 600 international units of vitamin D per day.
	Just a word to the wise.
	Make sure that you also get it.
	With vitamin K. Because if you don't get vitamin D with K, K helps the absorption.
	And if you don't take it with K, it can actually start to clog your arteries.
	But there's something else to be concerned about.
	And I wanted to talk about both of these because I had a listener who sent this to me.
	Adam, thank you very much.
	He said, you've got to be careful about getting vitamin D, artificial vitamin D, that has fluoride in it.
	Fluoride?
	Because fluoride, folks, is a poison in every way.
	Whether they put it in your water, whether they put it and make antibiotics out of it, as injured my son.
	He says, according to Dr. Google, fluoridated vitamin D is a vitamin D analog with fluorine atoms that has been added to alter its chemical and physical properties.
	These changes can lead to several benefits, including improved metabolic or chemical stability, blah, blah, blah.
	One of the things they say is reduce toxicity.
	Well, if it's fluoride, it's toxic.
	According to the International Journal of Molecular Science, he says, the discovery of a large variety of functions of vitamin D and its metabolites has led to the design and synthesis of a vast amount of vitamin D3 analogs in order to increase the potency and to reduce toxicity, they say.
	Yet, the introduction of highly electronegative fluorine atoms into vitamin D skeletons alters their physical and chemical properties.
	To date, many fluorinated vitamin D3 analogs have been designed and synthesized.
	And so he says, so a vast amount of vitamin D analogs?
	Many fluorinated vitamin D3 analogs?
	If we subtract many from vast, what do we see with these synthetic analogs?
	Are they free of fluorine?
	That's the thing you have to be careful of.
	He says all supplemental forms of D2 and D3 were always synthetic analogs anyway.
	He says that's why I step outside at midday with a bowl of olive oil and I produce my own natural vitamin D. According to the Oxford language and Google, fluorinate is another term for fluoridate.
	Many people search for the term fluoridate.
	So the big pharma sneaks it into the pharmaceutical drugs by calling it fluorinate.
	Same type of thing they do.
	So be aware of that.
	You know, vitamin D is important.
	Getting it naturally in sunlight is probably the best thing that you can do.
	It's actually a hormone.
	So if they're synthesizing it with fluorine, that is something to investigate for yourself.
	And it's always important to understand if you're getting something that is organic and also the source of where that is coming from.
	So that's very important.
	I wanted to pass that along to you.
	DG8, D3, 5,000 a day.
	You must take K2 to avoid plaquing of the arteries.
	Yep.
	Nutricost or Heel Masters is your best brand, says DG8. N-Max, everything out on fluoride, but still in the water.
	They don't listen to people.
	Chemtrails, GMO, our government occupied.
	Yeah, you know, as a matter of fact, I put up on Twitter the thing saying, all right, when you're going to talk to somebody about fluoride that really doesn't get it, you know, before you argue with them about studies about whether it's harmful or helpful, I said, just ask them if it makes any sense to medicate people through the water supply.
	And it doesn't.
	It makes absolutely no sense to medicate people through the water supply.
	And somebody else said, well, I guess it depends on how much you drink.
	It's like, okay, well, fine.
	You can make the argument about that, and you can also make the argument about if it's uniformly distributed.
	But again, you know, if you're going to give the same amount of fluoride to a baby as you give to an adult man, and how do you control that?
	How do you monitor that?
	The bottom line is, regardless of whether you're talking about how much water somebody drinks out of the fluorinated water tap, or whether you're talking about is this stuff uniformly distributed, you don't know.
	Because you dumped it in the water.
	You can never know.
	What we do know is that even if something is effective, it's only effective if you get enough of it.
	And if you get too much of it, anything, even something that is good for you, is going to become toxic.
	The difference between a medication and something that is toxic is a dosage.
	You know, people can die from drinking too much water.
	Remember the case, and I've talked about this before.
	They had, for a joke, they had on a radio station a bunch of people that would be there, and they'd have to ask them questions or something.
	When they'd get the question wrong, they'd have to drink water, and they wouldn't let them go to the bathroom, right?
	And a woman died just from drinking too much water.
	It diluted her blood or something.
	I don't know what the exact mechanism was, but she died, and this happened before.
	She died before the other people because she was smaller than them.
	So they were all drinking a lot of water, but she was the first one to pass out and die.
	And so why would we put fluoride in the water?
	That was my point.
	Somebody wanted to say, well, I think a baby's not going to drink as much as a full-grown man.
	It's like, how do you know how much either one of them are drinking?
	Too much or too little?
	It's got to be, why would you medicate people through the water supply?
	It makes absolutely no sense.
	Scott Helmer.
	Thank you.
	And I'm sure that Scott plays guitar.
	He's going to want one of those $10,000 Trump guitars.
	He's got a great side.
	I love your music, Scott.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, remember if a bioweapon really came out of the Wuhan lab, they would have blown it up.
	And they would have broadcast the footage on TV 24-7.
	This is all, yeah, the Wuhan thing is about shoving responsibility aside.
	And even though Rand Paul says, well, we're going to come after Dr. Fauci, what Rand Paul is doing is he's covering.
	He's covering, actually, for Fauci.
	Oh, yeah, they did it in China.
	I mean, he can always say, well, it was in China.
	We gave them some money, but they didn't do the right thing.
	We didn't know.
	We just gave them the money, and they did.
	It allows everybody, including Fauci, to get off the hook.
	For this bioweapon shot.
	Teresa Andrea says, D3 can be toxic.
	Colocalciferol, early and late sunshine is best.
	Leaches calcium from your bones.
	Yeah, so be careful about that.
	And imagine that...
	If it's affecting your bones, it might be because it's synthetic and fluorinated.
	Handy.
	Right dose, right route, right time.
	All things we consider on the ambulance when giving meds.
	How is any of that considered when you're medicating people in the water supply?
	That's absolutely right.
	Well, just one little quick thing here.
	This was sent from Earl.
	I won't use his full name, but I'll say that he works out.
	I'll talk about the company he works at.
	He says, I've been following you since InfoWars days.
	Just signed up for davidknight.gold.
	He says, I've been buying precious metals for some time.
	He said, take a look at my company's website.
	That's Laird and Company.
	He said, we're the oldest distillery in America.
	One of the oldest companies in the country.
	He says, a good place that still has traditional values.
	So, good for them.
	And it is a company that has been there a long time.
	The Trump team...
	Oh, by the way, I think I mentioned this just in passing when I talked to Tony yesterday.
	The Trump team is going to create the first ever White House crypto world.
	We did talk about that.
	We talked about the crypto czar.
	This is the thing.
	There's just so much news from Trump that is feeding this crypto climb.
	That's one of the things that concerns me because I don't believe the good news about Trump.
	And it's all depending on people looking at Trump and how he's doing everything that he can think of to help crypto.
	Well, the...
	Yes.
	Oh, before we run out of time, Karen said to thank people.
	And I have several people here that I wanted to thank.
	First of all, let me thank the people with Zell.
	And here's the names.
	I'll read them off real quickly.
	This is going back to November 7th.
	Robert F. Terry M. Kimberly M. Gretchen C. Raymond G., Felicia H. I'm sorry, that's Raymond.
	I'm sorry, not Raymond.
	Charles D. Michael P. Sean S. Adam D. Sophia M. Brian P. Susan L. Jeffrey C. Manny D. Michael P. J. H. Benjamin R. Thank you.
	Daniel C. Susan L. Julie W. and Gretchen C. Again.
	Thank you so much, all of you.
	And these are the people that we have received contributions from in the mail.
	Patricia and Matthew D., David and Deborah W., Kelly and Philip M., William G., Aaron W., Jack H., Ronald C., Stefan K., Ben and Cindy B., Brent and Ingrid S., David and Joan F. Brent and Ingrid S., David and Joan F.
	Thank you, all of you.
	I don't have the list here for Cash App, but I want to thank everybody so much for that.
	And just to let you know, we are up at three quarters now.
	We're within striking distance of the goal for this month.
	Next week, though, we will have some reduced programming.
	I'll be here on Monday, God willing, but we'll have some rebroadcasts, and we'll have a guest host some of those days next week.
	So we will see you on Monday.
	Have a great holiday.
	We're real excited because my daughter from Texas is on her way and with her baby and her husband.
	The baby's just a little bit older than Travis's baby.
	So we're real excited about that to see them.
	And they're going to be here through Thanksgiving.
	So have a great weekend, folks.
	And thank you for joining us.
	And thank you to all of you's names I just announced.
	Thank you so much for your support.
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲