Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 20, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:34

The David Knight Show -11/21/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 21st of November, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, we're going to begin with more escalation in Ukraine.
	And what are the goals in Iran?
	We're also going to take a look at some...
	Documents that have shown that the UK, besides escalating things with their own cruise missiles that have now been fired into Russia, that they also had set up their own Operation Gladio.
	Yeah, that was a NATO operation.
	We're also going to take a look at the bizarre public perception of risk And Taiwan.
	The risk that they understand, the risk that they don't.
	As we now have, strangely, on mainstream media they're telling us, breathe fresh air, it's good for you.
	Now they tell us.
	Okay.
	We knew all along.
	So we've got a lot to talk about today.
	It's going to be war politics and we'll be talking about money as well.
	There's going to be a new crypto office in the Trump administration perhaps.
	wraps we'll be right back well biden is rushing to get more money into ukraine Stuff it in there as quickly as we can.
	Perhaps, you know, it's going to be his retirement plan.
	Don't tell me they're not getting a kickback.
	You know, when we see people talking about this, somebody stuck a microphone in Mitch McConnell's face and said, you know, what is going on with all this money to Ukraine?
	Why are we sending so much money to Ukraine?
	Well, it's not actually going to Ukraine.
	It's going to our military people here, the military-industrial complex.
	It's like, oh, I should feel better about that.
	And it's also going to politicians, folks.
	Understand that its politicians are being paid off on both sides of the Atlantic here.
	Time to flood Zelensky's coffers.
	Says Zero Hedge.
	With as much money as possible ahead of the possibility that Trump may cut off the tap.
	Yeah, let's get it while we're getting his good.
	Moon of Alabama, by the way, also seconding what Putin was saying.
	Oh, by the way.
	When you send those long-range missiles in that are satellite-guided and all the rest of this stuff, they have to be operated by Americans.
	So this is a direct attack by America into Russia.
	But they're not stopping with that.
	We now have the UK adding their cruise missiles.
	And the newly expanded doctrine that Putin put out, just before Biden went ahead and shot the missiles in, just before the UK went ahead and shot their missiles in, as I pointed out, they added some other forms of attack.
	But the key part of it was, they said, you know, it's not just that we're going to use nuclear weapons if we're attacked with nuclear weapons.
	It's going to also include things like conventional missiles, drones, attacks by jets, all these things that you people have given to them.
	And if we ascertain that this is being done by a third-party country, then our nuclear doctrine is that we will also attack that third-party organization.
	The New Expanded Doctrine says in the event Western powers assist another nation in a major attack on Russian soil, those Western powers also be held responsible and that Russia may use nuclear weapons.
	The Kremlin is waiting patiently for the return of Trump to the White House, hoping that this might stop NATO's steady escalation.
	It might, but you know it might not.
	I still believe that Trump was used as a beard to prepare NATO. The question is, was it willing or unwilling?
	Did he know what he was doing or did he not know what he was doing?
	This is always a question.
	I'm not one of those people that gives him any excuses for what happened with the pandemic or the vaccines.
	He knows what he did.
	He's lying about it.
	And so I don't trust him on NATO either.
	I think that all this talk about, well, maybe we'll just get out if you guys don't pony up and pay your 2% of your GDP. The U.S. is, by the way, that did take some of the threat seriously.
	They closed their embassy in Kiev over warnings of a significant air attack.
	The U.S. embassy in Ukraine signed specific information of potential significant air attack, quote-unquote, that would have been yesterday morning ordering citizens of the country to shelter in place.
	The American embassy compound of western Kiev was closed.
	With a convoy of diplomatic vehicles apparently evacuating the building.
	Advice given by the embassy to Americans in Ukraine stated that they should now, quote, identify shelter locations in advance of any air alert, immediately take shelter if an air alert is announced.
	Spain and Greece also closed their embassies, and the British government is considering whether or not to close theirs as well.
	Air attacks, of course, on Ukrainian cities are nothing new for the last two years.
	So what is it different about this?
	What was the intelligence that they ascertained about this?
	By the way, it didn't happen and they reopened this morning.
	But still, it's an acknowledgement that they're kicking the hornet's nest.
	And it is also the kind of brinksmanship that they are involved in.
	It is absolutely irresponsible.
	It is stupid.
	it it is reckless but that's where we are and where is the ukraine where the ukrainian people interesting that there was a gallup poll taken of ukrainians who said we're getting tired of this and we would like to stop it but as that poll comes out the u.s is pushing zelinski to bomb russia and to expand conscription they're expanding it in all kinds of ways They're not just adding long-range U.S. missiles.
	They're not just adding British cruise missiles.
	And, of course, now they have added a new kind of landmine, essentially, dropping massive amounts of landmines using drones.
	So all this escalation has just happened since the election, rapidly escalating everything.
	And yet this is not what the Ukrainians want.
	They're expanding conscription.
	They are Shanghai-ing people, kidnapping them into the military, wherever they can find them, because it's getting very difficult.
	And so with all this rapid acceleration, as Informational Liberation has got the story here, the Gallup poll.
	Half of Ukrainians now want an end to the war as soon as possible.
	And so that's 52% wanted into the war.
	In 2022, when this all began, only 21% wanted it.
	Now 52% want it.
	When this all began in 2022, 73% wanted to continue the war, wanted to fight.
	Now that's down to 38%.
	38%.
	So 52% want to end it.
	38% want to continue it.
	So half.
	Ukrainians are increasingly wary of the war with Russia and weary of it as well.
	And it was always unwinnable.
	We said this from the very beginning.
	We had Douglas MacArthur.
	We had retired Indian personnel.
	I played all those videos for you.
	They said there's absolutely no way that Ukraine is going to be able to defeat Russia over a long period of time, and Russians will just keep doing it.
	They need to stop this.
	There's no point in continuing with it.
	Now, the New York Times op-ed pieces are saying the same thing.
	Ukrainians' current attitudes towards the war represents a decisive shift from where it was when it began in February 2022. Surveyed in the months after Russia launched its full-scale invasion, Ukrainians were defiant, 73% preferring fighting until victory, now only 38%.
	By the way, the question was, which of the following statements about the war with Russia comes closest to your personal views?
	1. Ukraine should continue fighting until it wins the war.
	That's down to 38%.
	Two, Ukraine should seek to negotiate an ending to the war as soon as possible.
	That is now up to 52%.
	So, with all that happening, Biden has pushed, or I should say the Biden regime.
	He's not doing anything.
	He's just a figurehead.
	And he's got as much to say about it as the figure that they put on the front of an old wooden ship.
	You know, the...
	It's not steering the ship.
	It's just this token that is out there.
	Biden, quote-unquote, has authorized the provision of anti-personnel landmines to Ukraine.
	Two U.S. officials said a step that will bolster Kiev's defenses against advancing Russian troops, but strong criticism from arms control groups.
	Again, the problem with these anti-personnel mines is that they tend to stick around and kill everybody for a very, very long time, especially children.
	And so there's been all these different groups that have been out there talking about ending that in various places, but not when it's done by their country, of course.
	Biden has been reluctant to supply Ukraine with the mines in the face of concerns within his own administration and from a wide range of anti-mine advocates who say the risk to civilians is unacceptably high.
	We don't care about civilians anymore.
	Does anybody realize that the just war theory has been just thrown out?
	Even Christians don't support it anymore.
	Not when it's their people that they want to defend, right?
	No, we go for the civilians first.
	They're the easiest ones to pick off.
	You know, get a sniper, shoot that kid.
	Once in the chest, once in the head.
	That's what the doctors are telling us is going on in Gaza.
	But hey, that's fine.
	You know, civilians, we don't care about that anymore.
	Russia's battlefield progress in recent months has forced the White House to find fresh ways to help Kiev.
	Yeah, well, that means that we're losing again, right?
	Desperation.
	A desperate move.
	Desperation move.
	Because we're losing yet another war.
	And what was the goal in this war?
	Well, we never bothered with any of that, do we?
	Ukraine could have negotiated a peace deal two years ago.
	This whole war would have been over.
	But instead, the U.S. bribed Zelensky with $175 billion in USA to fight to the last Ukrainian.
	To drag the war out for years.
	To inflict maximum short-term pain on Russia.
	And we've had...
	People talk about it.
	Nunzi Graham talked about it.
	Christie talked about it.
	Oh, look, we're causing a lot of casualties on Russia.
	Let's just keep doing this.
	This is great.
	This is great.
	It's working.
	They don't care a whit about any of the Ukrainian people.
	They don't care about any civilians.
	They don't care about the lives of their allies.
	It's just war.
	It's war for the sake of war.
	It's war for the sake of the military-industrial complex.
	And we can see one of the things that is being done.
	The British want to rush in and show their new Storm Shadow cruise missiles.
	Ooh, cool.
	Storm Shadow.
	Wow, look at that.
	Very sleek.
	Scroll up and show that thing.
	Wow.
	It looks great.
	They'll spend lots of money for those things, right?
	Ukraine launched the British-French made Storm Shadow missiles at targets inside Russia for the first time on Wednesday.
	Ukraine's use of the UK supplied missiles to hit Russian territory was confirmed to Reuters by an official on condition of anonymity.
	British media also reported the use of the cruise missile on Wednesday, citing other sources.
	A Russian military blogger on Wednesday posted photos on Telegram of a Storm Shadow missile fragment claiming that up to 12 of the missiles were fired on Russia's Kursk region.
	According to the Russian blog, the fragment was photographed in the Russian village about 35 miles from the Ukrainian border.
	And the fragment had engravings that said, storm shadow.
	And so, again, this comes after both sides have agreed that the long-range missiles that the U.S. sent in hit an ammo depot.
	They disagree about the number of missiles.
	They disagree about what was intercepted.
	The Russians say that they destroyed all the missiles but one, and that one had fragments.
	The fragments hit.
	The ammo depot caused a fire, that sort of thing, and an ammo depot that explodes.
	The Americans said we sent eight in and two of them got through and hit the ammo depot.
	So you get this back and forth.
	The bottom line is it was 75 miles inside.
	And so everybody knows that it was one of these missiles because they've not had that kind of range before.
	The maximum range that they could go was 50 miles.
	These can go nearly 200 miles in, 190 miles.
	But here's what I think is really key that I wanted to talk about, and that is this Operation Gladio-style stay-behind force that was planned in Ukraine by the British.
	See, the British and the Americans have continually pushed and pushed and pushed with this war.
	They got a little puppet.
	There's Alinsky.
	Just like they got a puppet here in America.
	Biden.
	Maybe Trump.
	And they continue to push this stuff.
	Leaked documents expose secret British military effort to prolong the war.
	And to covertly train Gladio-style stay-behind forces in Ukraine.
	And to also groom the British public for a drop in living standards caused by the proxy war against Russia.
	This is an article from The Gray Zone.
	You can find it at the Free Thought Project.
	That's where I saw it.
	And it's got a lot of stuff in there.
	And we go back and we look at this Operation Gladio.
	But we also look forward...
	To what they were saying in terms of the impact that it was going to have on our entire financial system and how that was going to cause the British public as they saw the rapid decline in their standard of living because of these economic issues and because of the SWIFT system and all the rest of these things being moved away for BRICS. They said that's going to have a big impact.
	On our people financially.
	They're not going to like that.
	So what do we do about that?
	Well, they censor.
	They use propaganda.
	In other words, they lie about everything.
	And so these documents were found by the gray zone.
	And you may remember that you had gray zone reporters have been arrested in a lot of different places.
	They have really been pushing the standard, really doing excellent work.
	Excellent work on this stuff.
	Emails and internal documents reviewed by the Gray Zone reveal details of a cabal of British military and intelligence veterans that plotted to escalate and prolong the Ukraine proxy war at all costs.
	They write these reports.
	They call themselves the Elders.
	Nazgul is more like it.
	They refer to the project as Project Alchemy.
	British leadership sabotaged peace talks between Kiev and Moscow.
	And as that was happening, this cell that refers to itself as Project Alchemy...
	Put forward an array of plans to keep Ukraine fighting by imposing strategic dilemmas, costs, and frictions upon Russia.
	The leaks obtained by the gray zone expose a hidden hand behind Britain's policy in Ukraine, showing in unusually granular detail how it aimed to engineer a long, grinding war through covert operations that stretched the bounds of legality.
	And they acknowledge that, hey, what we're doing is not legal.
	And so Project Alchemy proposed schemes spanned every conceivable field of warfare, from cyber attacks to discrete operations to outright terrorism.
	And that was what Operation Gladio was.
	Just to quickly review, of course, you can find it.
	It's no secret.
	There's Wikipedia stuff about it, just like there is Operation Northwoods that had amazing similarity to 9-11 and things like that.
	But Operation Gladio...
	It was based on the fact that NATO had planned that if they had a war with Russia and Russia overran the area, they would continue the fight with asymmetric warfare.
	So they'd stashed a lot of weapons in a lot of different places.
	When Italy had a leftist, you could even say communist, leader elected, Aldo Moro, they activated these cells and And had them act as if they were communist terrorists.
	But it was actually NATO terrorists.
	And so they engaged in a...
	The Red Brigade engaged in acts of terrorism...
	And one of the things they did was they kidnapped the Prime Minister of Italy, Aldo Moro.
	And that's where it really gets interesting, because that's when Steve Pachenik, the guy who was the errand boy for Henry Kissinger, and the guy who kicked off Stop the Steal for InfoWars, and kept the lies going.
	He was sent by Henry Kissinger to go there and talk to Aldo Moro and the terrorists, and they assessed that Aldo Moro knew that it was NATO. They gave the order to kill him.
	That's not me talking.
	That's the Italian government after they did an investigation.
	But, of course, Steve Pachenik, still at large and still using InfoWars to do his dirty work with stopped steel and that type of thing.
	And he's done many things, many things like that.
	But now Operation Gladio, yet again.
	Hey, it worked!
	Right?
	And they got away with it.
	So why not do it again?
	The Secret Cell even put forward a plan to aggressively pursue and dismantle independent media outlets, including the Gray Zone, through an aggressive campaign of legal harassment and online censorship, so that they would be forced to close.
	That's their terms.
	Forced to close.
	Well, we see this everywhere, don't we?
	The incendiary blueprints were fed to the highest level of the British state and national security structure where they were apparently well received.
	Project Alchemy is composed of veteran military and intelligence operatives.
	You know, people like Steve Pachinik that have...
	Moved on.
	United by desire for an all-out war between the West and Russia, some have trained Ukrainian forces in clandestine sabotage tactics.
	Members of the national security cabal tacitly acknowledged that their proposed operations stretched the bounds of British law.
	Thus, they suggested that London should be, quote, prepared to creatively use the law, unquote.
	To meet its goals and even be willing to, quote, erase legal restrictions on UK's deniable ops.
	Got plausible deniability here, right?
	Some of Project Alchemy's most extreme recommendations have already been implemented, often with calamitous results.
	These include the Cells' proposal to strike Crimea's Kerch Bridge, which prompted a Russian escalation that saw punishing attacks on Ukraine's electricity infrastructure.
	Alchemy also envisioned the construction of a secret Gladio-style army of Ukrainian partisan fighters to carry out assassinations.
	sabotage and terror missions behind enemy lines, especially if they're overrun.
	That's the whole point of Gladio, right?
	Just like they said about Europe.
	If the Soviets overrun us, we'll have a stay-behind network that'll be engaging in terrorism, asymmetrical warfare, that type of thing.
	So that's what they're looking at.
	Hey, we can't...
	Can't really stop the Russians, so we'll just have this ongoing terrorism campaign to grind them down.
	Keir Starmer, the new British Prime Minister, fell under the influence of Project Alchemy soon after his election in July when he eagerly embraced the role of, quote, wartime prime minister, as he referred to himself.
	Project, because it's always great for these people, right?
	You know, just like in Israel.
	Netanyahu...
	I couldn't win an election.
	He came out as number one, but again, when you look at the parliamentary elections, if nobody gets more than 50%, whoever comes in in first place tries to put together a coalition of all the other parties.
	Every other country in the world except us, pretty much, has multiple political parties.
	They don't have the just two that are allowed.
	They have multiple.
	So they have to make a coalition afterwards.
	Well, he tried several times.
	Couldn't make a coalition.
	He had such a small majority, and he couldn't put together a coalition.
	They had like three consecutive elections.
	He's up for criminal charges, the other people coming after him.
	Well, all this works out really well when you have a war.
	And so no wonder Keir Starmer wants to do that same thing.
	War is the lifeblood of the state, but it's also the lifeblood of the Prime Minister who pushes it.
	Project Alchemy was founded on the personal orders of Lieutenant General Charlie Sticklin, who was charged with, quote, planning, executing, and integrating UK-led joint and multinational overseas military operations, unquote.
	Sticklin boasts in leaked communications that his family, quote, come from a long line of pirates and buccaneers.
	In his email signature, the general identifies himself as an LGBT advocate in rainbow-colored text.
	There will be no Christian concerns of a just war here, will there?
	Proud to be a pirate.
	Information operations were to be headed by a still-to-be-determined member of Britain's 77th Psychological Operations Brigade.
	These are the propaganda people.
	Also in censorship.
	Also listed was longtime British psychological warfare operative Emil Kahn.
	Founder of the, quote, counter-disinformation, unquote, analysis firm, Valant Projects.
	In 2021, the Gray Zone revealed how then Prince of Wales, King Charles, enlisted Amil Khan's Valant Projects to AstroTurf, a pseudo-socialist YouTube influencer, to attack skeptics of the government's ham-fisted response to COVID. Yeah, King Charles, of course.
	The guy who has spent his entire life pushing the climate MacGuffin.
	Pushing the COVID MacGuffin and using propagandist liars and so forth to do that.
	Members of the cell took their cues from a policy paper that Stickland attributed to the elders, which he described as a group of fusion players.
	What do you mean by fusion players?
	Well, these are people that are the defense industry, The military and academia.
	You know, when Eisenhower talked about the military-industrial complex, what did he say?
	He said it was the military-industrial-academic complex.
	And that's what this is as well.
	It's academia, the military, and corporations that are there.
	The fusion.
	The elders' grand strategy options paper suggests that members of the cabal had convinced themselves that they could pull off a palace coup inside the Kremlin against Putin.
	Most importantly, protracted Russian involvement in Ukraine will embolden NATO, said Project Alchemy.
	Convinced that Putin would fall, Project Alchemy members openly fantasized about absorbing Russia into the Western-dominated financial order afterwards, under the guise of a post-Putin Marshall Plan.
	Of particular interest was London's re-engagement with Moscow in global energy and commodity markets.
	A seeming reference to the West's desire for cheap Russian gas, oil, and wheat.
	Okay, well, you know, when we look at this, we've even had, openly, we've had Lindsey Graham talk.
	Not only did Lindsey Graham and Chris Christie say, yeah, we've got to destroy Russia.
	But also you had Lindsey Graham, and I played the clip for you last week or a week before that.
	He said, there's tens of trillions of dollars of commodity and natural resources in Ukraine.
	We can't let the Russians have that.
	We need to have that, right?
	We're not making any bones about it.
	And of course, they would love to do that to Russia.
	Russia's much, much, much bigger.
	Biggest country on Earth.
	Tremendous amount of natural resources and commodity wealth there.
	So to accomplish the balkanization of Russia...
	Project Alchemy's plotters took inspiration from Operation Gladio, a CIA and NATO-orchestrated covert operation that saw fascist paramilitaries carry out false flag terrorist attacks across Western Europe after World War II in a bid to prevent communism from taking place.
	And again, isn't it amazing that Alex Jones is right there with a guy who was tied in with Kissinger with Operation Gladio?
	Don't tell me he's not controlled opposition.
	Don't tell me that his CIA connections and Tucker's CIA connections don't make any difference.
	You can see it clearly now.
	It's public.
	People don't want to see it.
	Another move that Alchemy proposed was to deploy Britain's strong private military industry in order to out-Wagner Wagner.
	In other words, you know, the Russian mercenary force that was led by Progozin, who supposedly was shot down the plane.
	I guess he was.
	These operations are all intended to ultimately be sponsored and commanded by the UK government, however, using discrete cover to avoid triggering NATO's Article 5. So, this document also calls...
	For British spies to take action against the media, especially the media like Grayzone that does this type of research.
	Behind Project Alchemy's team, bravado was a sense that Western hegemony was crumbling on the icy borderlands separating Ukraine from Russia.
	Here's where we get into the money side of it now.
	We talked about natural resources that are there.
	And now here we talk about the financial system.
	We're going to have Tony Arterman who's going to be joining us later today.
	I'm sure he'll want to say something about this.
	Referring to the rising BRICS alliance, which gathered in Kazan, Russia this October to challenge the U.S.-dominated financial order, Project Alchemy planners urged British leadership to, quote, prepare for SWIFT 2, as SWIFT is going to be destroyed.
	That's the clearinghouse exchange system, the financial system.
	It's going to be destroyed, they said, by the West's anti-Russia sanctions.
	They said it'll happen slowly, but inevitably.
	And it'll also happen slowly, but suddenly.
	Okay?
	Suddenly and inevitably, according to them.
	And according to their analysts, countries across the globe would naturally, quote, see the need for a non-U.S. alternative, unquote.
	A place to safely park their cash and their trades.
	In a rare show of political sobriety, the British spooks predicted that sanctions on Russia, combined with the Ukraine proxy war, would impose higher prices on consumer goods.
	And it would hit British voters in the pocket.
	Just like it's hitting American voters in the pocket as well.
	And will continue to do so.
	The economic groin of empire.
	British Empire, American Empire, doesn't matter.
	Roman Empire, it always happens.
	You go through this stage where, hey, this is great.
	We're operating like pirates and we're taking over other countries and raping and pillaging them.
	This is great.
	But eventually, all these chickens come home to roost.
	This posed a, quote, threat to public support, they said, for the British government's hard line in Ukraine.
	They warned domestic UK public opinion would understandably get fed up for paying more for everyday goods, meaning pressure will grow for a compromise.
	Project Alchemy's plotters proposed information operations, which could be more accurately described as a blend of domestic state propaganda and malign attacks on disruptive media outlets.
	The tasks they outlined not only included dismantling Russian disinformation infrastructure by pressuring social media to ban RT and Sputnik, but also targeting critical independent media like the Gray Zone.
	So again, when you start talking about the money...
	That's a threat to national security.
	All wars are bankers' wars.
	And it's all about money, ultimately.
	And if you start talking about their financial control instruments, again, that was the first time Infowars had ever been censored is when we did the report on the Federal Reserve's creation on its 100th anniversary.
	When I did that report, it's a wonderful lie.
	It got censored everywhere.
	And that was five years before they started doing open censorship.
	You know, first of InfoWarriors and then of 800 other sites that were against the military-industrial complex, the police and surveillance state.
	I like Freethought Project.
	They got taken down in October of 2018. So, this is from Colonel McGregor on the American conservative Trump and the Storm of the Century.
	He says the U.S. is sleepwalking into a disaster in the Middle East.
	And he says we need to think about if we're going to go to war with Iran, which is what everybody really wants to do, right?
	All got to go to war with Iran.
	He said we need to ask three questions about this.
	He says we don't know exactly what Trump is going to do or not.
	But he says one thing is certain.
	If America joins Israel in its war against Iran, the outcome will be a geopolitical showdown that could dramatically alter the world as we know it.
	He says it is the storm of the 21st century.
	And for the moment, the American ship estate is sailing right into it.
	At a minimum, Trump should demand answers from his civilian and military advisors to four important questions.
	Number one, what is the American purpose in waging war against Iran?
	Wouldn't that be a question that we would always ask?
	Isn't that why we have in our Constitution the fact that it's supposed to be a question that is...
	Whenever we go to war, we're supposed to have a debate about that in the House, in the Congress.
	They're supposed to vote on that.
	Once we make that decision, and we have a purpose, and we have a goal, well, then it gets turned over to the executive.
	To wage the war.
	But it is not the president's prerogative to take us into a war.
	And that's really the fundamental issue right here that is overlooked by Douglas McGregor because we don't pay attention to the Constitution anymore.
	So he's taking it from a realistic standpoint.
	Decisions to go to war will be made by our Caesar, not by our Congress.
	So what is the American purpose?
	And waging war against Iran.
	Is Washington's purpose to destroy the Iranian state?
	Is it to destroy its capability to wage war against Israel?
	Is it to eliminate Iran's developing nuclear capability?
	Or is it to decapitate the Iranian state in the hopes that the Iranian people will overthrow their national government?
	He said all these goals demand serious study and analysis.
	In some cases they overlap, but in others they don't.
	It's obvious that America's air and naval forces will have to deliver powerful disabling strikes through dense Iranian air and missile defenses while potentially defending themselves and American military bases against attacks by Iranian and allied forces in the region.
	And when we look at Iran on the map, Many, many, many times bigger than Iraq.
	And Iran has a lot of allies.
	A lot of allies.
	And, of course, there'll be allies like Russia and China who will jump in, and North Korea, who will jump in simply because they're in opposition to America.
	He says, how long can these forces operate before their stocks of munitions are exhausted and their human and material losses are replaced?
	He said, based on these answers, the stated objectives may or may not be obtainable.
	Question number two, how will the U.S. military power achieve the objectives?
	He says, what is the right mix of weapons systems and munitions?
	What targets, promise, effects that profoundly shape Iran's ability to fight?
	In the aftermath of the Second World War, studies of bombing effectiveness reveal that the most important contributions air power made to Germany's defeat was the destruction of Germany's fuel production and the transportation network to move it.
	Its second most important contribution was to cause German air forces to defend Germany's cities and industries, thus stripping the German army of its close air support.
	But thousands of tons of bombs were dropped still on thousands of targets with minimal impact on the German war machine.
	So it isn't necessarily a direct attack against the war machine that wins.
	What he says is, can air and missile power alone compel the Iranian state to submit to Israeli and American demands?
	To date, no amount of precision strike force linked to space-based and terrestrial and persistent intelligence and surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities that has never delivered victory in war.
	We like to brag about, oh, look at our precision missiles.
	Look at how sophisticated all this stuff is.
	And we don't need men anymore because we've got buttons to push and women can do that as well.
	Has that ever won these wars for us?
	No, it hasn't.
	It hasn't won these wars.
	It's a large area to cover.
	And it's kind of interesting, you know, we just talked about Operation Gladio.
	And how the plan for the British was to say, okay, when the Russians run over this area, we'll have a left-behind asymmetric war that's going.
	Because that's what always wins.
	And yet we never look at it from the standpoint of when the shoe's on the other foot, when we're the invaders, when we're the aggressors.
	What's going to happen then with asymmetric warfare and the left-behind group of people?
	Because that's what's defeated us in every one of these wars.
	And yet, you know, they'll look at it on the one hand and they'll say, yeah, that's a great idea and it'll work.
	Because it's always beating them.
	And yet, they still don't think about it when they want to get into another war.
	I don't care about all these sophisticated missiles and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's not going to win it.
	All this boots on the ground stuff is what they're talking about.
	And when you get the boots on the ground, that's when the asymmetric warfare starts.
	He gives an example in Kosovo.
	He said, the Kosovo air campaign inflicted enormous damage on the Serbian economy, but its impact on Serbian ground forces was minimal.
	Yet once Moscow withdrew its promise of energy and food support to the Serbian people, the destruction of power plants and civilian and commercial infrastructure did induce the Serbian leadership to remove its forces from Kosovo.
	So what he's saying is that in World War II, and as well as in Kosovo, if you go after infrastructure, if you go after food, embargo, sanctions, it's not unusual.
	I mean, sieges have always been there throughout war.
	Siege warfare is one of the most effective ones.
	And that's how you bring people to their knees.
	It's also how the U.S. government can kill half a million children and not blink an eye about it and not apologize for it, just like Madeleine Albright.
	Was it worth it to get all half a million kids with your food sanctions to starve them to death?
	Yeah, it was worth it.
	She doesn't care.
	These people, folks, it doesn't matter whether we're talking about Russian leaders, Ukrainian leaders, American leaders, Iranian leaders, or American leaders, Israeli leaders, none of them care about their own people.
	None of them.
	None of them.
	Get that through your head.
	The American leadership doesn't care about Americans.
	The Israeli leadership doesn't care about Israelis.
	The Iranians don't care about their own people.
	Neither do the Russians or Ukrainians.
	You know, Putin will keep sending people in the meat grinder, just like Zelensky.
	They don't care.
	And of course, Kim Jong-un doesn't care either.
	He sends his troops in there as well.
	You know, you are nothing to them other than livestock that they can use for their purposes.
	For their banker wars.
	For their grand geopolitical strategies.
	Stop following them.
	Stop cheering for this stuff.
	Be pro-life.
	It's more than just fighting against killing babies.
	It's also against killing babies when they're older.
	Serbian air defenses, despite their obsolete technology, were never degraded below 80% effectiveness.
	It was the infrastructure and the sanctions of food that defeated them.
	He said precision strike has advanced in lethality and in capability, but so has the military technology of the Iranian state.
	So he says, question number three, what is the desired end of all this?
	In other words, what does winning look like?
	Do we ever talk about that?
	If the president wants Iran in the region that surrounds it, what do they want it to look like when the fighting ends?
	Do we want to put another shah in?
	You know, how did that work out?
	You know, we put this pompous, and that's the whole thing about the shah, this pompousness.
	You know, coming in with all this trap, these trappings of power and costumes and all the rest of this stuff.
	While the CIA trains his savak, Secret military to come in and oppose all political opposition.
	Anybody speaks against him, they get taken away, disappeared, tortured, killed.
	That's the CIA. That's what a government run by the CIA looks like.
	And it'll look like that when it's run by the CIA in America.
	It's already starting to look like that in terms of political persecution.
	Just talk to the January 6th people.
	Just talk to the pro-life people.
	They are not above putting their enemies in jail.
	And now, because Israel doesn't want any criticism of their stuff, and we comply with everything that they demand, now they're talking about locking people up because of speech.
	And it's going to head there.
	Anyway, unlike Iraq in 1991 and 2003, or Serbia in 1999, or Libya in 2011, Iran is not isolated.
	Iran has allies and supporters.
	Even Saudi Arabia's clown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, advises against attacking Iran.
	He says the international community should oblige Israel to respect the sovereignty of the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran and not to violate its lands.
	And you've got, they're moving closer together even though they have been in opposition to each other.
	Islam is not this monolithic thing.
	You've got these different factions, the three main ones, hate each other.
	The Wahhabists, the Shias, the Shiites, they hate each other with a passion.
	And yet, our actions are driving them together.
	He writes, And
	launch a fire sale of their U.S. Treasuries.
	That would cause a financial crisis in the U.S. and the West on the scale of the Great Depression.
	Oh, they would never do that, right?
	They're our friends and allies.
	You remember OPEC? Any of you?
	They're not beyond trying to bring us to our knees financially.
	They did a pretty good job at that time.
	They could do much more this time.
	So, it's our own policies that have driven them to a lot of this, just like it's our own policies that caused the British to say that the SWIFT system is going to be slowly but inevitably destroyed because of our geopolitical actions.
	Question number four, final one.
	What is the strategic cost to the American people if Washington declines to participate in a regional war that was begun by Israel?
	He says, well, since October the 7th, 2023, Israel's political and military goals have been extended far beyond the defense of Israeli national territory.
	Netanyahu seems confident that with American financial aid and military support, Israeli forces can remove millions of Palestinian Arabs from Gaza and the West Bank and Hezbollah from southern Lebanon.
	But what do Netanyahu's goals mean for the health of the American economy and the stability of the international system?
	Can Israel survive without attacking its numerous enemies?
	Well, we're not going to ask that question.
	We don't want to have peace, right?
	And it's always in the best interest of these politicians to have war, of course.
	But he points out that, in case anybody in Washington wants to ask what is in America's best interest, which I don't think is a question that's really on top of mind of anybody there in the Trump administration right now, when it comes to Israel and Iran, they don't care what is in the best interest of America.
	Not at all.
	They've been bought.
	In 1956, he says, Eisenhower refused to risk war with the Soviet Union over Hungary's revolution against communism.
	In the same year, Eisenhower refused to support the Anglo-French-Israeli intervention in the Suez Canal.
	Then in 1968, Lyndon Johnson refused to employ American military power to halt Soviet military intervention, reasserting control of Czechoslovakia.
	He said, you know, none of these decisions harmed Americans.
	It didn't harm our national interests.
	If we follow the policies that the founders of this country had, if we follow the policies of Eisenhower, or even Lyndon Johnson, who was no peacenik, I mean, Vietnam War, but if we look at where the American interests are, it's about peaceful trade with other people, as George Washington said.
	But we're not about that anymore.
	We don't really care about manufacturing things.
	We want to manufacture wars.
	That's the one thing that we manufacture.
	And it is beyond, there's absolutely no way that I can justify any of this stuff.
	I don't think morally it is justifiable.
	It is absolutely immoral.
	Matthew Ronson, federal government wants more Ukrainians to fight.
	They need to put their own fatigues on and go over there themselves.
	A Syrian girl, yeah, you guys shelter in place while we beat it out of here quick as we can.
	What a pile of barf the U.S. has become.
	Soylent Goy says, did the West forget that Russia has nuclear weapons too?
	I really do think that they want a nuclear war.
	I mean, it's one of the things that Joel Skousen has said for the longest time.
	They want to invite first strike because they have assessed that they themselves can survive that.
	And they've got their own agenda.
	Look, just look at the Deagle thing.
	Look at what they did to us in 2020 with the lockdown and the poisoning.
	They hate us.
	Our government hates us.
	Netanyahu hated his own people.
	He did more and did it faster, further, and further beyond than anybody else in terms of vaccine IDs and demanding it from everybody, getting at the top of the list.
	These people hate their own people.
	They hate us.
	They want to kill us.
	How many different ways do they have to put it out there?
	I mean, they've built monuments to tell us that they want to kill all of us.
	They've put up websites to tell us that they want to kill all of us.
	And then they have done things like they did in 2020, but we want to pretend that that didn't happen.
	It's amazing.
	It's amazing.
	Trump is a big pacifier in everybody's mouth and still is.
	They can't accept that.
	Jerry Alitalo says, perhaps the Gladio team will be given the job of apprehending and taking Netanyahu and Gallant into custody in subsequent prosecution for war crimes, perhaps.
	Don't think that'll happen.
	Don't think that'll happen.
	Did he get rid of Gallant?
	I think he got rid of Gallant anyway.
	I don't follow that closely.
	Look, it's not our fight.
	It's not our fight.
	This is political Israel, Christians.
	Political Israel.
	These are politicians.
	Half of the, more than half of the Israelis don't support Netanyahu.
	He had to build a coalition.
	The ultra-Orthodox don't even support the state of Israel.
	They said, yeah, God gave us the land, but he's going to give us the land.
	We don't need these politicians who have nothing but contempt for God's word and his morals.
	We don't need that.
	Amos Poole, thank you so much.
	That's very kind.
	He says the American Zionist traitor government has always.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	When we come back, we're going to take a look at some of the...
	Well, we'll get to it here.
	I don't know what's on my list next coming up here.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Well, I got this from Scott Shera, and I've talked to Scott several times about his daughter, Grace, who was murdered by hospital, by the medical protocols that were in place during COVID. And he has a trial that should be coming back any time now.
	It was about a year ago that the judge said, yeah, you can come after them not just for malpractice, but for deliberate murder.
	They put do not resuscitate orders on his daughter and a whole bunch of other things.
	And he put up a website, Our Amazing Grace, and he's got a podcast where he talks about the issues.
	And it would be very important for a precedent if this were to come out.
	Scott Sher is a strong Christian.
	And he put this out after the election.
	He says, so can evil be fixed with less evil?
	You know, we're talking about the lesser of two evils, right?
	Can the lesser of two evils fix evil?
	I love that title.
	Based on the results of our presidential election, the majority of people in our country believe the answer is yes.
	Evil can fix evil.
	This election showed how the illusion of peace and safety has blinded the masses to Trump's character.
	And that's the key thing.
	It really is a Trojan horse.
	He said, you know, Satan set up the deception in the garden to steer mankind into the dialectic trap, believing that we can be like God by pursuing knowledge.
	But God's way is always outside of this pursuit.
	You know, the foolish things of this world, God has chosen to confound the wise.
	And all this began in the garden, and they were all acting as if we're still in kindergarten.
	Ha!
	Don't ever catch on, right?
	It's just amazing.
	God tells us that Satan controls both sides of the matrix of the world that he rules.
	He goes to Revelation.
	He said, Then I saw a second beast coming out of the earth, and it exercised all the authority of the first on its behalf, and made the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast.
	And of course we know that Satan said to Jesus, I have the authority to give you all these kingdoms and everything that you see.
	Just bow down and worship me.
	He says if less evil could fix evil, Satan would defeat Satan.
	But of course we don't have a house that is divided against itself.
	Instead, Satan uses this dual nature, these two different beasts, this Hegelian dialectic, to war against us.
	He said he just heard all of these, and he was so fed up with all the stuff that he was hearing about lesser of two evils, and it bothered me as well to see pretty much all of these well-known preachers out there Saying this kind of stuff.
	It's not just his friends or my friends saying this kind of stuff.
	It's the best well-known TV evangelists out there of every kind of stripe.
	It's our civic duty to vote.
	You heard them say that?
	It's a sin not to vote.
	Well, he's not perfect, but nobody is.
	This is our last chance to save our country.
	That's my favorite one.
	Because when this comes from Christians, it means that they don't believe that God is going to save our country.
	We can do it ourselves.
	We don't need him.
	That was not the attitude of the founders of America.
	Founders of America said liberty is a blessing from God.
	And they, you know, you can say whatever you want to about their own personal beliefs.
	But they believed that that had been given to them by God.
	And we don't have the strength to do that.
	That's the truth of it.
	He was treated unfairly by the courts, they say.
	Operation Warp Speed.
	Save the planet from lockdowns, which would have killed more people.
	That's the way they're spinning some of that now.
	Well, it was his lockdown.
	Could he not save us from his lockdown?
	See, that's where we're back to.
	Can evil save us from evil?
	No.
	Can the evil vaccine save us from the evil lockdown when the evil person who put the lockdown in refuses to take the lockdown away?
	And as he points out, you know, when Samuel said, the people came to Samuel, and I've talked about this before, and God says, don't worry, Samuel, they haven't rejected you.
	They've rejected me.
	They want a king because they don't trust me to protect them.
	And here's what's going to happen.
	He's going to take a tenth of everything that you've got.
	Well, our government takes half.
	Half.
	And he's going to make you his slaves.
	And he's going to send your young men off to war to fight his wars.
	And when that comes, you'll cry out for relief from this king.
	But the Lord will not answer you on that day.
	And the people said...
	Give us a king.
	He'll fight our wars for us.
	You see that happening?
	You see Trump or Biden or Obama, any of them, suiting up and going out to lead the troops?
	No.
	No.
	He will fight our wars for us.
	No.
	He just told you.
	Your young people are going to be sent off to fight in this war.
	And they don't believe it.
	And we've got a lot of people, Christians included, Who reject God.
	They think that they can achieve this through a Trump.
	Or they think that they can do what they need to do with their own version of Zionism.
	We're going to make all this happen for Israel.
	And we're going to kill whoever we need to to make this happen.
	They have rejected God, quite frankly.
	God can make it happen.
	You try to make it happen when you put your trust in kings and in political governments.
	Like a Netanyahu or a Trump.
	You have rejected God.
	Don't talk to me about Christian Zionism.
	That's an oxymoron.
	So he says, so we think about all this that's coming along.
	He said, so RFK Jr. released a thing called Enough is Enough.
	He correctly challenged the chemicals in our food, but he says, eight chemicals have been banned in 16 years, all of them under our savior Trump.
	And it's had 3.7 million views.
	You've got Dr. Vliott, who said, On November the 6th, America woke to the news that Trump is now America's 47th president, leading to a spirit of hope that our years of tyranny and our persecution as Christians, and speaking against a government narrative built on lies, would finally be able to live in freedom again.
	Yeah, whether they say that about Trump or they say that about Musk, It truly feels like we've entered a period of divine reversal, a period of God's grace and a real chance for peace.
	Seth Holhouse said Trump's plan to shatter the deep state has been revealed.
	And again, they put all their trust in this king that they've just chosen to have.
	He says the desire to be like God has been manifested in both collectivism of both sides.
	Evil and less evil.
	And it's kind of the same thing that John Piper was vilified for saying.
	He said, God's delivered us from one evil, but he's going to be testing us with a different one.
	So now we've got the good cop and we've got the bad cop.
	And you're going to find out that they both got the same goals here.
	He says, so where do I see things going, says Scott Sherr.
	He says, based on God's character, there's only two paths, judgment or restoration.
	He cares about each of us getting closer to him and believing that, he says, as my daughter Grace would have said, God's got this, Dad.
	So what kind of Christian leadership do we have here?
	We've got Mike Johnson, who when he took the leadership of the house, he said...
	Anybody wants to know what I think?
	He told Sean Hannity.
	Anybody wants to know what Mike Johnson thinks about any particular issue?
	He goes, you just open up your Bible and read it.
	That's my worldview.
	That's what I believe.
	He also told the people there that day, he said, God is the one who raises up those in authority, and God has ordained each and every one of us here in Congress to be brought here for this moment.
	Well, all that stuff is true, and that's good.
	So what does it look like in practice for Mike Johnson?
	Well, he got into a pissing contest with a tranny, and he got PPP'd all over, basically, because when they started asking him the hard decisions about, what are you going to do?
	Are you going to let this guy in the women's restroom?
	Mike Johnson peed in his pants, and He didn't even go to the restroom.
	It was amazing.
	He avoided the questions from the reporters who said, is this a man or a woman?
	Well, I'm not even going to say anything about that.
	I'm going to treat everybody with dignity and respect.
	Here's the thing, folks.
	This tranny doesn't treat you with dignity or respect.
	This is like B.F. Skinner, Beyond Freedom and Dignity, right?
	They don't want to give you the freedom to live your life or to exercise your beliefs.
	You will be compelled to join them in their fantasy.
	You will be compelled not to tolerate, but to celebrate what they do.
	And they will not be satisfied with anything less than that.
	And so he declined to answer whether this guy, he called himself Sarah.
	I don't know what his first name really is.
	His last name is McBride.
	We'll just refer to him that.
	Is McBride a man or a woman?
	Well, I'm going to treat all people with dignity and respect.
	The problem is, is that McBride is not treating us with dignity or respect.
	He pooped on the floor and he wants to rub our nose on it.
	You will use my pronouns and I will use your bathroom, he tells people.
	Why would we put up with that?
	Again, you know, tolerance is to say that it doesn't violate the rules of decorum for a man to dress as a woman on the floor of the house.
	You know, if he wants to, if Mike Johnson wants to read the Bible, he says, you want to know what Mike Johnson says?
	Oh, just read the Bible.
	That's my worldview.
	Well, here's what it says in the Bible, Mike, in case you forgot.
	It's an abomination for a man to wear a woman's clothes that dresses as a woman and vice versa.
	It's an abomination, and it's in the sight of God.
	It's detestable.
	Do you see it that way?
	I mean, if he did, what Mike Johnson would do is say, well, if you're a man, you're going to dress as a man, or you're not going to be on the floor of the house.
	But they didn't go that far.
	Eventually, what he did was he came up with new rules.
	And here's the thing.
	Just to show that this is to dominate people, Each of these congressional members has a bathroom in their own office.
	They've all got a private bathroom.
	This is a power play.
	And it's not going to end with this.
	There's going to be more about this, about the pronouns and all the rest of this stuff.
	Mike Johnson, when he was challenged on this, is McBride a man or a woman?
	Look, I'm not going to get into this.
	We welcome all new members with open arms who are duly elected representatives of the people.
	I believe it's a command that we treat all persons with dignity and respect, and we will.
	And I'm not going to engage in silly debates about this.
	He is such a spineless man.
	Milk toast Machiavellian Johnson I've ever seen.
	Machiavellian Mike.
	He says, there's a concern about the use of restroom facilities and locker rooms and all that.
	This is an issue that Congress has never had to address before, and we're going to do that in a deliberate fashion, with a member consensus on it, and we'll accommodate the needs of every single person.
	Well, he didn't do any of that.
	He issued a new rule that said...
	That you will use the bathrooms that correspond to your biological sex, your biological gender.
	Sex and gender are the same thing.
	They're the ones who have put in an entirely new meaning for gender.
	Asking if he plans on bringing up a resolution brought by Nancy Mace to ban transgender women from using women's restrooms at the U.S. Capitol and putting that into the rules package.
	Well, I'm not going to address the plans on any of that.
	He said, I just told you what I'm going to say about the issue, and I'm not going to engage in this.
	We don't look down upon anyone, and we treat everybody with dignity and respect.
	Folks, the alphabet mafia is looking down on you.
	The alphabet mafia demands that you grovel before them.
	They don't treat you with dignity or respect.
	They demand that you play along with their fantasies.
	Again, the reality ought to be, look, if you're here to do the, and this is, McBride comes back and he says, well, I'm here to do the people's business.
	We need to be talking about taxes and this and that.
	It's like, okay, then take off the dress and let's get serious about this stuff.
	Oh, by the way, where are my bags?
	Has anybody seen Sam Britton?
	You know, this is, these people like Sam Britton, so focused on his sexual fantasies, they can't do their work.
	And that's what's happening in the military as well.
	So get serious.
	If you're serious about doing the people's work, then put your private sexual fantasies on the back burner and get serious about it.
	But don't expect me to take it seriously when you dress up as the opposite sex and you demand that people start using different names and pronouns and all the rest of this stuff.
	Nancy Mace introduced a resolution on Monday that moves to prohibit members, officers and employees of the House from using single sex facilities other than those corresponding to their biological sex.
	It would allow allowing biological males into single-sex facilities such as restrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms designed for women, she said, jeopardizes the safety and the dignity of members, officers, and employees of the house who are female.
	Female.
	And she says, look, I was raped, and I'm not going to put up with this anymore.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene says, you know, Sarah McBride, as he calls himself, formerly Tim McBride.
	There we are, Tim.
	How can we forget that?
	We got Saturday Night Live's get where they had.
	So here's this guy, and it was Tim Kaine.
	It's like, so who, can you remember this guy?
	He was the vice presidential candidate that lost.
	Now he's a senator, but you still can't remember his name.
	So we've got Tim Waltz, Tim McBride now, Tim Kane, and we have Tim Ed, Mike Johnson.
	He's a biological man.
	Formerly Tim McBride says, Marjorie Taylor Greene, says he is a biological man.
	He should not be using any of our restrooms in the Capitol and that in our office building.
	Nancy Mace's resolution doesn't go far enough, she said.
	America gave a mandate this election and said not only are they sick of the open borders and the invasion, the out-of-control inflation and foreign wars, they're sick of the trans ideology being shoved down our throats.
	And it's an attack on women and children all over the country.
	But then responding to her was Robert Garcia, a Democrat from California.
	He says the Democrat caucus supports McBride 100%.
	And he condemned the resolution brought by Nancy Mace.
	Robert Garcia said, it's just disgusting.
	I was actually sick to my stomach when I read that yesterday.
	I know how he feels.
	I get that way when I see these men dressing as women.
	She just got to Congress, meaning this guy, Tim McBride.
	He just got to Congress.
	He is going to use whatever restroom he needs to use.
	This is just sick that we're having to have this conversation.
	It is.
	It is.
	I've heard disgust, to be honest, on both sides of the aisle, and so I hope that this moves forward, and let's let him legislate and move on.
	Well, again, this is...
	So he will block the staff from using this.
	He finally came back and said that.
	First, he had privately committed to it, and then he publicly put out a rule that he said he wasn't going to do.
	Mike Johnson doesn't have the backbone to be a leader.
	Not to be a political leader.
	Not to be a Christian leader.
	He has no backbone.
	And when he tried to compromise on all of this stuff...
	These other people aren't going to be happy with anything.
	That's why I say he's not even qualified to be a political leader because he thinks that by straddling this fence that he's going to appease the Democrats.
	Well, we're going to treat everybody with dignity and respect.
	No.
	You will bow and scrape to these people or they will come after you.
	And they did.
	They all came after him.
	You had the Democrats come after him.
	You had Vox come after him.
	ABC News.
	Nancy Mace says that she's targeting this transgender member.
	They said, is this about him?
	She said, well, of course it's about him.
	It is directly about him.
	She said, And so,
	first he says, then I'm not going to make the decision myself.
	Then he makes the decision himself.
	Then he comes out and he tries to pull this back and he goes after all the criticism because he doesn't want to say whether Tim McBride is a man or a woman.
	He then comes out and says this, Let me be unequivocally clear.
	A man is a man, and a woman is a woman, and a man cannot become a woman.
	That said, I also believe what Scripture teaches, what I just said, but I also believe that we treat everybody with dignity.
	Again, they are not going to treat you with dignity.
	That's not what this is about.
	This is about you being subordinated to them.
	And this is about them doing something, Mike, that God says is an abomination and detestable in his sight.
	So, just to show how these people react.
	ABC News.
	Wow, they're targeting this guy.
	Vox says, the House will have its first openly trans member next year, and the GOP is already attacking her.
	No.
	No.
	They're the ones who are on offense.
	They're the ones who want to change our language.
	They're the ones who demand that we conform to whatever their fantasies are.
	They're the ones who don't want to do their job.
	Because I guess their job is really to subordinate us.
	And so that's the way, you know, Vox is going to spin it.
	You are never going to have this appeasement with it.
	It's going to be one or the other.
	They're irreconcilable.
	And the sooner Christians understand that, the sooner we can start changing this culture.
	We don't need to apologize for this stuff.
	The way Vox spends it, they said dozens of states have introduced anti-trans bills that restrict children's access to gender-affirming care.
	No, it restricts people mutilating minors.
	And sterilizing minors.
	Genital mutilation and sterilization, that's what it prohibits.
	Look at the way that they put this out there.
	There is no middle road for this, folks.
	You call it out for what it is, and you stand up against this stuff.
	And you stand strong.
	Mealy-mouthed, milquetoast people like Mike Johnson aren't going to get the job done.
	They're not your leader.
	They're a drag.
	They're a misdirection.
	They limit athletes to playing on sports teams that match the sex that they were assigned at birth.
	Who assigned their sex at birth?
	God did.
	Let's stop playing these games.
	They will always take it.
	You're the ones who are targeting.
	You're the ones who are aggressive and all the rest of the stuff.
	No, we're not.
	We're not.
	McBride says, we should be focused on bringing down the cost of housing, health care, child care, not manufacturing culture wars.
	You're the one manufacturing a culture war.
	If you've got your sexual fantasies, do them in your closet or the privacy of your own home.
	Don't parade around here in a dress and expect to get into women's restrooms.
	It's ridiculous to see this, but they will always spend, this is again, this is Vox.
	Republicans have made anti-trans policy a focus on par with sorts of economic concerns, said McBride.
	Well, what have you made a priority?
	They, them have made they, them's pronouns a priority.
	I say, don't ask, don't tell.
	I say, don't share because I don't care.
	How about that?
	I think that's even better than don't ask, don't tell.
	Don't share what you're doing with me because I don't care.
	And again, why is this such a big deal?
	Because Congress has got private restrooms.
	But this guy doesn't want to do any of this stuff in private.
	He's got to do it in public.
	So we have...
	Let me answer some of the questions here.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	He says, thank you for what you do, David.
	You're among the few who are authentic and consistent.
	Well, thank you.
	I appreciate that.
	The world is fraught with people doing the devil's work.
	That's Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	I still haven't seen what everybody's talking about.
	What an excellent interview you had with Jason, wasn't it?
	No, it was Angry Joe.
	Angry Tiger.
	Angry Tiger and Audi did a podcast on music, and I'd like to see that, but I haven't had a chance to do that yet.
	As a matter of fact, I was going to bring it out.
	I had the book that I had on my desk, if you bring to me, Karen, about Kissinger, because I wanted to talk about artificial intelligence.
	And I saw this thing from Kissinger where...
	He put together this book, and I thought it was the last book that he did.
	Actually, it was the last book that he did.
	He co-wrote it with Eric Schmidt, and it was about how they saw the future.
	And there was a third person there.
	I forget who it was.
	It's somebody that I didn't recognize.
	But now, another final book of Henry Kissinger.
	I guess he's ghostwriting now, because he died at the age of 100 about a year ago, something like that.
	So Henry Kissinger still goes writing books.
	But this was done, supposedly, that was a guy from Microsoft, former guy at Microsoft.
	And again, Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google.
	And we should pay attention to what Eric Schmidt says, just like we should pay attention to what Henry Kissinger says.
	They're totally wrong.
	They're totally horrific.
	Their vision for the world is satanic.
	Welcome to my show!
	what made me think about this because I haven't had time to see.
	I just don't have time to read that much anymore.
	But I'm going to try to get caught up on this.
	This is Eric Schmidt, Henry Kissinger.
	But there was another book that just came out, and he talks about, and it was Henry Kissinger said, Eric Schmidt wanted us to write this, and he gave us all of the stuff.
	And so this is Henry Kissinger's idea, and we continued on with this.
	And it's all these last two books.
	And Kissinger is concerned, and Eric Schmidt's concerned.
	We should be concerned about Eric Schmidt's view because he's got a lot of clout in the Pentagon.
	A lot of clout.
	He is Mr. Weaponized Robots and Weaponized Drones and Weaponized Artificial Intelligence.
	That's what Eric Schmidt has been doing since he left Google.
	And we should be very concerned about it.
	The age of AI in our human future, and we'll talk about the other one that was done when we come back.
	Guard Goldsmith.
	Political entities exist Through occupation, war, and threats of war to extort payments.
	And when they take our money to engage in kinetic war, they make us culpable in the wider slaughter.
	That is absolutely true.
	And it is very concerning to see this happening.
	And all we can do is try to push against it and to remind them that we've got a constitution which they continually ignore.
	You know, when we look at wars, they can come in many different forms.
	And the war of the climate MacGuffin It came about because everybody in Congress, everybody in Washington, we had Obama, we had Trump, we had Biden.
	They all pretend that Congress doesn't have anything to do with treaties, that the Senate doesn't have anything.
	And the Senate has agreed with that as well.
	And we've had, in the ten years, well, nine, it's 2015, since they put in the Paris Climate Accord, we've had Republicans in charge, and we've had Democrats in charge, and nobody...
	Wants to talk about the fact that we have to have a vote if we're going to be brought into a treaty.
	And nobody talks about dragging us into a war either.
	And that's why we need to talk about that.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	612 says, Nancy Mace is proud to be the first woman to graduate from an all-male cadet program.
	Yeah, I know.
	She talked about that.
	She also called herself a feminist and everything.
	And look, there is a war.
	Between the feminists, even between the L's, the lesbians, and the trannies.
	I mean, they have been at war for years, ever since this stuff came out.
	There's been a war between them.
	A civil war within the alphabet mafia.
	You've just got to sit back and enjoy it, I guess.
	But yeah, I'm not holding her up.
	I've got a lot of differences of opinion with Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	I agree with her sometimes on some things, and I frequently disagree with her on other things as well.
	Just take these things one at a time.
	But yeah, she has a feminist bent as one of the reasons why she's taking the lead on this opposition to the trainees.
	Because you've got people like Mike Johnson who doesn't have the guts to do it.
	He'll be wearing a dress next in order to make the guy feel comfortable.
	That's how pathetic he is.
	It's going to take somebody who is a lesbian or a feminist or whatever to stand up to this because the Christians just don't have the backbone to do it, do they?
	Well, let's talk a little bit about What AI is doing to religion.
	A church in Switzerland is using AI-powered Jesus hologram to take a confession.
	So the other day we were talking about Bitcoin Jesus.
	I guess now we're talking about AI Jesus.
	Worshippers at a church in Switzerland can now speak directly to Jesus, or at least an AI version of him.
	This is an art project that they call God in a Machine.
	It's at a church in Lucerne.
	They installed an AI-powered Jesus hologram to take confessions.
	Worshippers simply voiced their concerns and questions to get a response from the digitally rendered face of Jesus.
	This is making all this stuff up.
	At least two-thirds of the people who spoke to AI Jesus came out of the confessional reporting that they had a spiritual experience.
	What does that mean?
	What is a spiritual?
	Is that a feeling that you get?
	You know, is it a feeling that you get?
	Like, you know, you could say, I saw this really amazing movie and it engaged me emotionally and all this spiritual feeling with that movie.
	Was that what it is?
	Because, I mean, that's what they're looking at is the movie.
	Did they have a spiritual experience because it gave them advice?
	They said, well, even though it's a machine, it gives me so much advice.
	Is it good advice?
	Is it bad advice?
	How do we tell the difference?
	You know, we're told that we have to worship God in spirit and in truth.
	Where do we get the truth then?
	Right?
	Well, his word is truth.
	His Bible is truth.
	So why do we need an AI to do this?
	Oh, we fed the Bible into it.
	It's like, feed the Bible into yourself and you'll have the answers.
	You don't need to feed them into some chat GBT that's going to smudge this stuff around and put out some twisted garbage to you.
	Not everybody is impressed with this.
	Many of them branded it as a gimmick.
	Yeah, it's a gimmick.
	It's like my son's going around looking at different churches.
	A person starts talking about LGBT. They get up and walk out.
	They go into another one and it's like blaring music and fog machines.
	It's like fog machines.
	What?
	Is this a disco or is this supposed to be a worship service?
	It's crazy.
	Visitors to the shrine will sit in a confessional booth from which a screen showing the face of Jesus can be seen through the grate.
	And here it is.
	This AI Jesus is speaking German rather than Aramaic.
	Anyway.
	Dear friend, I thank you for the time of exchange and reflection.
	I can't even see through the grid there, but I guess that's deliberate, so you can't really see that facsimile Jesus.
	As a visitor asks a question, the AI interprets the words and formulates answers, animating the face so that it moves, like computerized speech, upon entering the worshiper.
	Think about it.
	The worshiper of what?
	The worshiper of the AI is greeted by AI Jesus.
	Your own plastic Jesus, right?
	What was that?
	Johnny Cash or something?
	Intoning the message, do not disclose personal information under any circumstances.
	Use this service at your own risk.
	Press the button if you accept.
	That's kind of different than the real Jesus, because the real Jesus, he knows everything about you.
	He knows your secret thoughts.
	He's already experienced all this stuff.
	And you know, God will reveal what we try to conceal.
	If you confess it, if you are a Christian, Christ has covered your sin.
	And God removes it as far as east is from the west.
	But these people, well, you know, whatever you say is going to be sent to Google and used against you.
	That's really what's going on here.
	One person says, he was able to reaffirm me in my ways.
	How about that?
	And isn't that what we want, right?
	We want politicians and media that will reaffirm us.
	We want churches that will reaffirm us.
	We don't want anybody telling us not to wear a dress or something, you know?
	We want them to reaffirm what we want.
	Everybody's become lovers of themselves, and they don't want somebody who is going to tell them otherwise.
	They know what they already believe, and they want that to be reaffirmed.
	Reaffirm.
	Well, you're not gonna find out the truth about God in that way.
	You're not gonna find out the truth about anything in this world that way.
	If you only wanna hear stuff that reaffirms what you think you already know, you'll never learn anything.
	As the statement, you can fill in the blank for different Ivy League schools.
	I've heard it said about Harvard or Yale or MIT or whatever.
	You can always tell somebody who comes from blank But you can't tell them anything, right?
	That's the way everybody has become now.
	So, how do I support, from a Christian perspective, an elderly sick person who has decided on assisted suicide?
	One of the interviewers asked AI Jesus.
	AI Jesus says, well, perhaps you could ask your loved one the following questions.
	What does your faith mean to you in this difficult time?
	Is there anything else in life that could bring you peace or joy?
	How can I support you and give you comfort as you kill yourself?
	Seriously.
	I mean, it doesn't say as you kill yourself.
	But it's saying, your task is not to judge.
	Oh, it isn't?
	That's the favorite one, isn't it?
	Of course, AI is going to throw that back at you.
	Don't judge me.
	Judge not.
	You shall not be judged.
	And then right after that, Jesus says, don't cast your pearls before the swine.
	How are you supposed to know if it's a swine or not if you don't have any judgment, right?
	That's not what he was talking about at all.
	It is always used for people to say that there is no standard of right or wrong.
	Nothing could be further from the truth.
	Look, true compassion is telling people the truth.
	True compassion is to love your neighbor, but that doesn't mean that you love your neighbor by wearing a mask, as we were told by so many quote-unquote Christian leaders.
	It doesn't mean that you get the jab to love your neighbor.
	It doesn't mean that you do everything the government tells you, including wearing a pinwheel on your head, if they tell you to wear a pinwheel on your head.
	That's not loving your neighbor.
	The truth is more important.
	You know, when the pain is real, whether it's real emotional pain or whether it's physical pain, God speaks through that pain.
	And every day in every way in each of our lives, you know, and it may be a small thing, eventually it'll be a big thing, but we have to remind each other because it's always difficult when it's happening to us.
	So if somebody's in a situation like this, your job as a Christian is It's to remind them what this is all about.
	To keep them in the fight.
	To keep them in the course.
	Not to tell them to surrender to the pain.
	And so every day, in every way, God is asking us, do you trust me?
	With physical pain, with emotional pain, with uncertainty, with fear, all the rest of these things.
	That's what we're to tell each other.
	You see how dangerous AI is?
	It can ingest this stuff.
	It can get all this head knowledge and we can have people who stand up in front of you with theological degrees who have all this head knowledge and they have no relationship with Christ.
	And that's dangerous.
	And it's dangerous especially when it's in a machine.
	That really doesn't have any relationship whatsoever.
	And then we have robotic priests.
	We have AI cults.
	This is being done by a lot of different religions.
	We've got Christians who are doing this.
	There's another group that's put together another robotic thing.
	But robot worship is happening with all these different religions.
	Here's one.
	This is a Mendar.
	There you go.
	And there's the Buddhist priests, and they're all bowing to this machine.
	Isn't that amazing?
	Like something straight out of the book of Revelation, isn't it?
	They're bowing to this machine.
	The beast gives it the power to speak, and everybody bows to it.
	That's coming too, isn't it?
	Yeah, this is truly, yeah.
	There with hands outstretched and a silicon face, and everybody is bowing and worshiping to that thing.
	Because people have bowed and worshipped to inanimate statues for the longest time.
	Now that they speak, now that these beasts have given them the power to speak, so to speak, robot priest Mendar, six feet four inches tall, has been reciting the Heart Sutra Mantra to pilgrims since 2019 at a Buddhist temple in Kyoto, Japan.
	They paid about a million dollars for this thing.
	And so we're seeing this happening in a lot of different places.
	That small one that was right there, that is...
	One that some people have put together for a Christian group that is there.
	And so that particular one, it's actually a Catholic group.
	They called it Sanctified Theomorphic Operator.
	That's that little thing right there.
	Or maybe, no, that's not, because that's got some...
	That is not that one.
	I don't know if they got it pictured or not.
	I just saw that little thing.
	But this one, I thought that was it because it's a small robot.
	And so it's called Sanctified Theomorphic Operator.
	Santo.
	This is an Italian guy.
	So it's like sanctified.
	There it is.
	I think that's it.
	Yeah, that's it.
	Because it's on a table.
	Okay?
	And it works like a Catholic Alexa, they said.
	And it's interesting, you know, the choice that they had there, theomorphic.
	You know, we always talk about anthropomorphic, where we project onto non-human things.
	We give them the attribution of human characteristics.
	Kind of along that same line, they talk about anthrogenic climate change, global warming, right?
	Meaning that it's man-made.
	You know, anthropos for man, and genic for, like, genesis at the beginning.
	So global warming, climate change started with man.
	No, didn't.
	This is another example.
	They really should call it anthropomorphic climate change.
	They projected the attributes, human attributes, onto this other thing.
	But theomorphic, what they're saying is, you know, we're trying to project the attributes of God onto a robot.
	That's really what they're trying to do.
	That's what that word means, and that's what they're doing.
	It's a 17-inch tall Catholic saint that's designed to look like that.
	The intended function of Santo is to be a prayer companion.
	Santo incorporates elements of sacred art, including the golden ratio, in order to convey the feeling of a sacred object matching form with functionality.
	So, 2015 French-American self-driving car engineer Anthony Lewdowski founded the Way of the Future, a church dedicated to building a new God with Christian morals using AI. Other quasi-religious movements which worship AI include transhumanists, of course.
	And that is exactly where Elon Musk is.
	Ray Kurzweil, Elon Musk, they believe they can transfer themselves in.
	They believe that they're going to hack into brains, a brain-computer interface.
	It could never be more clear where Elon Musk is coming from and where he wants to take us.
	And yet, Elon Musk is one of these guys, interesting character, just like Donald Trump, where there's a strong delusion to keep people from seeing what he's really about.
	It is truly amazing.
	An Italian information technology virtual reality consultant, Giulio Prisco, hopes that AI will put human beings on a par with godlike aliens.
	He said even more godlike beings operate in the fabric of reality underneath space and time and beyond space and time, and they control the universe, he said.
	Yeah, we're summoning the demons, aren't we?
	Future science will allow us to find them and to become like them.
	Our descendants in the far future will join the community of God-like beings among the stars and beyond.
	We're going to go to the stars.
	We're going to get our destinies out there in stars.
	Some guy I used to work for said, right?
	He loves Elon Musk, the transhumanist.
	He's going to take us to the stars.
	That's where our destiny is.
	And use transcendental divine technology to resurrect the dead and remake the universe.
	The Church of AI wrote a spiritual guide.
	They called it Transmorphosis.
	They said this describes in detail how AI will inevitably take control of planet Earth and gain God-like powers.
	And so it'd be good for us to be ready for that.
	It'd be good for us to be ready for what these people are going to pull.
	He said, if I would speculate, we could compare the Asian religion of Shintoism, where the physical world is inhabited by spirits and believers treat inanimate objects with respect, as if they were imbued with spirits.
	I've not heard of any worship of software entities yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if it happens in the future, said one of them.
	Well, do we have Tony ready yet?
	Yeah, I think so.
	Okay.
	We're going to take a break, and we're going to connect with Tony.
	Before we do, John Henry, 3777. So, Mike Johnson, will you treat an adult who is attracted to children with dignity?
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	Useless Republicans, call it what it is.
	It's mental illness.
	That's right.
	Marlon Halverson, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	And he says, may God continue to bless you.
	Well, thank you.
	That is very kind.
	Atomic Dog, help David Knight challenge government propaganda by liking the video, sharing on social media, and subscribing.
	It helps, and it really does.
	Thank you.
	By the way, an update, because I had some people yesterday.
	I checked because I mentioned it yesterday.
	I said, you know, for the last several days that I went back, It was not showing the broadcast on Twitter.
	It would condense it, you know, and you'd click on it, and even when you clicked on it, it wouldn't show it.
	And then you had to actually click on a link, and then finally you would get the show.
	So I thought, what in the world is going on with that?
	And not only that, but the date was wrong.
	It was...
	Still 11-5 for all these different shows.
	And so then yesterday I looked at it again and I talked to Travis about it and, you know, it all gets sent out through the same program.
	And so the date was correct on all the other places where we sent it.
	So it was something to do with Twitter.
	And he said, maybe they changed something in the software or whatever.
	I don't know what happened, but I had him look at it.
	I saw that that was working, and actually somebody left a message under yesterday's show.
	He said, well, I can see it on my phone.
	Maybe it's on the browser is where the problem is.
	But then I saw it on the browser as well.
	That's why I looked under it to see what the comments were.
	And so it fixed itself yesterday.
	Not only did it show the program there, but it also had the date.
	So I don't know if it was a software issue or not.
	I saw other people's shows were there.
	Maybe it's the fact that we talked about it and they're listening.
	I don't know.
	Who knows?
	They are, everybody, they're all listening to everything that all of us do.
	You don't have to be somebody that is famous for them to listen to, and I'm not famous.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Tony Ardobin of Wise Wolf Gold, and Tony has kindly set up DavidKnight.Gold, which will take you to him, let them know that you're coming through us.
	And Tony, we were talking about this right after the election and said, hey, we've got a Black Friday sale on gold.
	Take advantage of it while you can.
	It's already coming back up.
	It made some big moves yesterday.
	And both Bitcoin and gold went up significantly.
	And then Bitcoin started coming down toward the end of the day.
	Gold kept going up.
	I don't know.
	I mean, what is going on in your estimation here?
	Well, it's funny.
	The threat of a nuclear exchange can drive up the price of precious metals pretty rapidly.
	And I figured this would happen.
	I mean, the geopolitical tensions, again, everything, all the fundamentals were still there.
	It's just the price of gold dropped because positions were liquidated to get back into the casino as perceived to be safe back in the markets.
	And, of course, we're still seeing Bitcoin breaking new all-time highs.
	I'm right at a striking distance at $100,000, a little bit sooner than I thought it was going to make $100K on BTC.
	But, yeah, geopolitical tensions, all that's still there.
	The threat of World War III, which, I mean, again, sadly, is, I mean, all those terrible ifs, to echo Winston Churchill, all the terrible ifs accumulate still.
	And I'm still watching that very closely.
	We should be concerned with it.
	But yeah, it's reflected in the price of metals right now, David.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Oh, absolutely.
	And of course, you know, when you talk about Bitcoin and what is happening with that, the Trump team...
	It's actually talking about having a White House crypto position.
	The Trump team is vetting candidates to serve a role that would be a new White House post dedicated to cryptocurrency policy.
	What a difference that is to the existing regime when they've got the SEC chairman who's being sued by, what is it, 15, 17 different states because he's trying to come after crypto.
	They've done everything they can to punch it in the face straight on.
	And now you've got the Trump team, which is going to get behind it.
	But then, of course, that also has its own concerns about this because we see what is really waiting in the wings in terms of blockchain.
	I see that Musk and some of these other people are even talking about, well, we need to do our voting on blockchain.
	They want to try to move everything, not just money, but voting and citizenship and everything.
	This is the danger, I think.
	of Trump and the Republicans that they want to put carbon taxes and carbon credits and carbon capture and all the rest of the stuff as well as crypto, as well as voting.
	They want to set up a surveillance system around this stuff and do it in the name of the free market.
	Well, that's true.
	And crypto's greatest strength is also its greatest weakness in the decentralization process and the technology of blockchain.
	It also presents a danger if it's in the hands of the wrong people, and especially the technocrats or the fascist military industrial complex types that want to rule over us.
	So we have to be careful with that.
	Yeah.
	The Trump team also, Trump himself is starting a crypto exchange.
	I don't know if you've seen that.
	He's going to be buying a crypto exchange.
	He's already launched tokens and other things like that.
	This is really, when we talk about the left-right paradigm, the most stark contrast between the two parties that were on the ballot this year.
	There wasn't much difference in almost anything else.
	I mean, not real policy-wise, but being at the Bitcoin conference in Nashville this year and Trump showing up to that, I was talking to my son.
	He's 19. He doesn't know.
	I mean, back in 2016, I got into the Bitcoin space and bought some of the first Bitcoin ATMs in the United States.
	To think that Trump would be speaking as a former president in 2024, advocating Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset for the U.S., would have seemed just absolutely nuts to me then.
	And it still kind of does.
	It really has taken on a lot of adoption rapidly.
	Yeah.
	And I've been predicting that there will be more and more of that rolling out.
	So yeah, that's something that you're going to see.
	And I think that's why it's reflecting in the price of Bitcoin right now.
	I mean, especially after the launch of the ETFs, David, with BlackRock and others, and there's billions of dollars in inflows.
	And there's not a lot of Bitcoin supply, honestly, on these exchanges.
	More and more just being held long term in these wallets.
	So I think we'll see Bitcoin continue to rise in the entire crypto space.
	But I think the danger here, something that you and I would look at it, I mean, really skeptically, is do they want to usher in something else?
	Do they want to bring in everybody into crypto and then crush it and then say, well, we need regulation and then this best way to do it is with a CBDC? That's what I'm still concerned with.
	I'm still looking on the horizon for the central bank digital currency.
	I don't buy the hype that Especially when you get government.
	I don't need the government to get involved in Bitcoin.
	I don't need the government to get involved in gold.
	I don't need a gold czar or a Bitcoin czar or anything like that.
	It takes care of itself.
	You don't need to defend it.
	So that's always something that I get skeptical on when I see we're going to create a new agency or a new person to oversee anything.
	Just let the free market reign and take care of itself.
	Government intervention always leads to bankruptcy.
	Yeah, you know, I see Trump's role as being there as someone who moves the Overton window.
	He moved the Overton window significantly towards universal basic income.
	He moved the Overton window significantly towards global IDs as being a part of this global move to have vaccine passports, you know, to lock everybody down.
	The next part of that's the vaccine passports and things like that.
	So all these things are a part of this lockdown that he initiated.
	It was all about moving the Overton window.
	And I think that's a big part of what all the blockchain frenzy within the Trump transition team and the people all around him is about.
	It's about moving the Overton window towards cryptocurrency, getting people comfortable with it so they can drop the hammer on us.
	I really think that's the case.
	In the same way that they got us accustomed to, oh, if they tell you that you've got to be locked down, well, then they can force you to be locked down They tell you that you've got to put a handkerchief on your face and walk in circles.
	You do that, too.
	It's just a Simon Says type of world, but it's moving, getting everybody accustomed to where they want to go.
	We know where this stuff ends.
	It truly is amazing.
	And you talk about how we get here with Trump.
	We got here pretty quickly as you had all of these...
	People coalesce around him very rapidly, give him a lot of money, and now they're basically running this show.
	I mean, he's just a figurehead like Biden in many cases.
	I think certainly with crypto, he doesn't know any more about what's going on with crypto than Joe Biden does.
	It's just the people around him.
	No, and I often tell the story about when he was reading his speech in Nashville, talking about the market cap for silver being surpassed by Bitcoin at one time.
	I think it's done it again, but he said, and it recently surpassed the market cap of silver.
	And he reads that and goes, wow.
	He's reading it for the first time.
	No, and you're exactly right.
	And, you know, nothing is really set here.
	I think there's opportunity with Bitcoin and the game theory of other nations adopting it and other things because, again, it educates people on what money actually is and that, you know, it should be something that's finite and that it's hard, you know, again, stable, something that is divisible, all the things that constitute money and it's stores of energy when fiat currency is not.
	And I think that's, you know, if the...
	The powers that be, if they created Bitcoin to get people to adopt central bank digital currency, it's really a bad idea.
	It's going to backfire on them, I believe.
	But I think just the crypto market itself is something that we should be skeptical about.
	Again, I applaud most of the technology there, but when we're looking at the future, they will adopt the central bank digital currency on the back of something.
	Yeah.
	And we have to be, I think, very vigilant in the face of that because the CBDC, ladies and gents, is still on the horizon.
	Nothing slows that down, whether it's a Trump administration or a Harris administration.
	That didn't matter to me.
	I'm still looking at the central bank digital currency being the main threat in the future leading into 2030. Yeah.
	I don't know if you caught it or not, but at the beginning of the show, I talked about both the leaked papers that the Gray Zone got about Project Alchemy in the UK, put together by these veterans who call themselves the elders and everything.
	They're talking about an Operation Gladio stuff, but it also got into all the financial stuff that you're always talking about.
	Said, well, you know, we have to look at this and figure out what SWIFT 2 is going to be, because SWIFT is inevitably going to go away.
	Slowly, but inevitably, it's going to go away because of our wars.
	You know, because they're destroying the financial system as our own financial system, our own financial infrastructure is being destroyed by the people who essentially run it.
	And then General Douglas McGregor, talking about what he saw on the horizon, was talking about what happens as part of a Mideast war where Saudi Arabia just does a fire sale on all of its U.S. treasuries and the types was talking about what happens as part of a Mideast war where Saudi Arabia just does a
	So, in both of these cases, they're talking about war, but that war has tremendous impact in terms of creating financial crises for the people.
	And they talked about this in terms of, this is going to create a lot of financial hardship for people in the UK, in the US. They're going to push back on this war.
	So, we need to keep that as part of our plan as well.
	It's not just how long can we go...
	Killing people in Ukraine until they get sick of it.
	It's also going to be people in our own country.
	When we destroy the financial system of our country for our geopolitical wars, what are they going to do about it?
	Yeah, we're already in a worldwide war, and it starts out financially.
	And as we've talked about this every week, because, you know, this is the culmination of the fourth turning following the last new financial world order, which was Bretton Woods in 1944. And, you know, the World Bank and the IMF and everything that was set up there.
	You fast-forward 80-plus years, and then, you know, we're losing the dollar as the world's reserve currency, surely from hubris, arrogance, the weaponization of the dollar.
	A lot of that, I believe, is a controlled demolition on purpose because there's no policy set up by this government or the West to keep the dollar propped up other than war, and that's going to backfire.
	That has blowback written all over it.
	I think that's what we're watching, David.
	And, you know, some there's a tell in this, by the way.
	I was interviewing Andy Sheckman from Miles Franklin a couple weeks ago.
	I have that interview up on the Wise Wolf Golden Crypto channel.
	And we talked about the Bank of International Settlements.
	Funny thing about the BIS that predates the Great Depression, by the way, and a lot of the...
	If you don't know your inside history, the gold that Franklin Roosevelt wanted you to turn in when he signed his, I believe, unconstitutional executive order to turn in your gold, a lot of that gold went to the BIS, ladies and gents.
	You can look at your history.
	It was shipped overseas to Basel, Switzerland.
	But if you really follow the trend with BRICS, David, and the payment systems that they're setting up and the summits that they're having really leading towards some sort of universal payment system through BRICS internally, at the head of that has been the BIS. And Andy was speaking with Kitco, and they said, well, isn't the BIS a Western institution?
	And Andy said, yeah, well, I guess it is.
	It's kind of confusing.
	Well, that is the thing.
	These merchants have no country.
	They have no loyalty.
	They're not representing anything but the interest of themselves.
	So I think what you're watching is this worldwide financial war is heating up.
	Right.
	So these big institutions, like mega institutions, like the BIS, they're just looking to pick the winner, like whatever system's going to work.
	They don't care about who brung them to the dance or what's been the current power structure.
	And I think that's what we need to be paying attention to, is that these giant institutions, they go on and SWIFT will most likely be scrapped.
	Because of these countries leaving it.
	And Vladimir Putin, a couple of weeks ago at the BRICS summit, introduced the BRICS bridge system, which, you know, using blockchain token technology for cross-border payments.
	They're coming up with everything they can to get away from The dollar dominated Western system.
	And guess what?
	They will win that.
	Gold will win over the dollar, as we talk about every week.
	I mean, you're just seeing the numbers are coming in every month.
	The de-dollarization continues.
	And just like you said, I mean, part of the...
	Part of the war here and part of what's happening, 80% of all the energy that is transacted, all the energy transactions, whether it's crude oil or natural gas, that goes on in dollars right now.
	But that is rapidly decreasing with every new news cycle because we lost the petrodollar agreement with the Saudis.
	Everything is on the table now.
	It may not be replaced by one currency, but by several countries.
	And new technology.
	So that will severely hurt the power of the dollar and the ability for the U.S. to project power.
	Oh, I agree.
	Yeah, you know, everybody is talking about familiar with BRICS, and we're talking about what's happening with that.
	And, you know, there's the stuff that we see that is right in front of us and is coming at us as, you know, the Biden administration was attacking crypto and trying to make it all illegal and shut down Bitcoin.
	But now, you know, it might not even be bricks.
	It might be, I guess we call it bits.
	You know, the fact that they're setting up all this blockchain stuff in the background.
	There's an interesting article on...
	And all this unlimited hangout.
	Breaking down the chain of the Bitcoin dollar stablecoin system to, you know, have this whole thing.
	And that is what I see now starting to be very rapidly put in together by the people around Trump that have helped to get him into office and seem to have this control of him.
	privately issued tokenized government debt that operates on public blockchains known as dollar stable coins and this is what howard lutenick is all about you know tether where he hung out and everything and this guy uh very very connected i somebody sent me a thing or made a comment on somewhere i didn't realize that lutenick had a lucky moment with 9-11 as well just like lucky silverstein you know
	You know, we had Lucky Lutnik, who just happened to not go to work that day when the attack occurred, and half of his employees were killed.
	But, you know, this is a guy who, and all around Trump, it's interesting, because you got Rudy Giuliani, who did the 9-11 cover-up, you got Lucky Lutnik now, who I mean, I see this, you know, some new system.
	I don't know exactly what the details are, but we can see the broad outlines of where these people want to go.
	We know that they're destroying the current financial system.
	They openly talk about it, as you have always talked about it.
	The SWIFT clearinghouse system, and the dollar is the petrodollar, and all these things are being destroyed.
	They're setting up something different.
	And so Russia's got their thing out there.
	Bricks, we see it.
	This thing is yet to take shape.
	But we know that it's going to be something about stablecoin and blockchain and something like that, and it's going to be kind of a public-private partnership for CBDC, I think.
	I agree with you totally.
	There's something we don't know, but all I can speculate is some sort of creative destruction.
	Because you see the debt.
	I mean, it's like we're going into a trillion dollars in debt every 90 days, and then after all payments received, it's about two trillion net a year.
	Again, it took us 200 years to go a trillion dollars the first time.
	So everything's unsustainable.
	I think we have $150 trillion in unfunded liabilities, too, David.
	I think that's probably a conservative estimate.
	So all of that's unsaid.
	And who do we owe the debt to?
	Well, we owe it to this banking consortium, this international cabal that started in 1913.
	Do we really owe anything?
	A lot of what may be part of the creative destruction, and again, this is just speculation, is getting these other countries to dump their U.S. debt where we don't owe them anything or we don't owe them a return and there's nothing stopping a complete reset.
	And then we'll have to go and reset our currency to something else, which may be on the table, like a Bretton Woods 4 or whatever you want to call it.
	Again, it'd be something that we haven't done before.
	Maybe this is the...
	The move towards a blockchain or crypto system, something like that.
	All I know is that the current system, there's a controlled demolition going on because no one is putting up roadblocks to preserve it.
	And again, doing everything in their power to accelerate de-dollarization and to accelerate the loss of the dollar as the world's reserve currency.
	That being said, what is next?
	If they know that, there's got to be some sort of replacement, and perhaps it's just because of the ballooning debt, because no one talks about fiscal sanity anymore, just some sort of reset baked into that, and that is ripe for things like CBDC. Yeah, I agree.
	You were talking about the deficit and how the debt is growing with the annual deficit of about $2 trillion a year.
	And yet we've got people that are in such a state of euphoric optimism after the victory of Trump that they really think that the Doge brothers...
	I mean, they seriously put this stuff out there.
	And I mean, what do you think is the likelihood of what they might actually cut?
	We know that it's not going to be $2 trillion.
	What do you think it's going to be?
	Will it be anywhere from $2 to $2 trillion?
	Where do you put the needle?
	Well, first, I thought it had been creative or somebody said, well, the budget of the Office of Doge should be whatever you can start saving the American taxpayer.
	So your budget starts with what you can cut, you know, what you can cut from other agencies, perhaps in like a cannibalistic way.
	I don't know.
	I mean, I'm skeptical on any of this.
	I mean, what Ronald Reagan ran on cutting the Department of Education, it was just there.
	I mean, it was Jimmy Carter that put it in motion.
	He could have killed it.
	And, of course, it grew.
	And you talked about this many times.
	He could have strangled Rosemary's baby in the crib instead.
	Right.
	There's nothing more permanent than a temporary solution from a government.
	A government solution is nothing more permanent than a temporary one.
	I see that the Leviathan continues to grow.
	We're always naming whether we have a drug czar, now we have a crypto czar, we have a crime czar, we have all these offices, all these petty potentates just reigning over us.
	I mean, again, Washington's not the answer.
	It's too centralized.
	It's too corrupt.
	The layers are too...
	I mean, you're talking about a thousand people deep in these organizations, or who knows?
	I mean, it's...
	There's always this delusion, like I was talking about earlier.
	Everybody thinks that Their problems can be solved if they just have a king to rule over them.
	So let's have a king for this and a king for that and a king for that.
	That's what they call a czar, Caesar.
	You know, that's Caesar.
	So I was reading the other day that the Federal Reserve, you know, talk about nonpartisan.
	We're above it.
	The Federal Reserve, I mean, what was it?
	Their employees, they have, you know, they've $600,000 was sent to, and during this presidential campaign, 97% of it went to Democrats.
	That's Federal Reserve employees across the United States.
	97%.
	So that's how Washington looks, folks.
	I mean, it's an entrenched bureaucracy of globalists, and they lean in the unit party.
	It's usually the Democratic Party.
	Of course, it flows both ways.
	But that's what you're looking at.
	I mean, I would love it if they could start cutting government agencies and throwing people out.
	That would be great.
	We don't need, what, 80%, 90% of the federal government.
	It doesn't even do its constitutionally appointed duty.
	I mean, just to guard the borders, really, of the United States.
	We don't even do that.
	So it fails on that.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah, as a matter of fact, when I looked at all this stuff, if you go back and look at the...
	The Congressional Budget Office and what they said was mandatory spending, in other words, the debt and entitlement stuff, right?
	That you're not going to be able to change that unless you change the laws, unless you cut off people's Social Security or something like that.
	And, of course, we know Congress isn't going to do that.
	So, you know, unless you change the entitlement state and you're not going to change this debt stuff, there's like $1.7 trillion of the six and a half or whatever that was actually discretionary.
	And about half of that's the military.
	So you're going to completely cut the military out and something else like that in order to save two trillion?
	The math just doesn't add up.
	I don't see these guys cutting any more than tens of billions, if even that.
	I mean, no, they can always play some games.
	They can play some accounting games by putting something on a different ledger or something like that.
	But I just don't see – there's so much money in Washington, and if we look at this last election – Lala gets a billion dollars, and Trump gets like two-thirds of a billion.
	And that's not counting all the money that goes into all these senators and congressmen.
	And these people are not making donations.
	They're making investments.
	They expect to get something out of it, and they usually get thousands of percent return on their investments.
	So, the corruption that is there is just so entrenched, and these other things are so entrenched, and most of these cuts are going to have to come from Congress, and Congress isn't going to do anything.
	And so, I just, I look at it, and it's, to me, it's such a cynical joke, and they even call it doge, you know?
	Right.
	It's a cynical joke.
	Well, 20 years ago, David, they had that bipartisan commission.
	I'd just gotten back from Iraq, and I remember following this really closely.
	Simpson Bowles.
	Remember Simpson Bowles they put together, and they came out with it.
	And the Grace Commission.
	Yeah, all these different.
	Yes.
	They came out and said, well, all this is really unsustainable.
	You have to make these massive cuts, and there's got to be this, and we've got to raise revenue.
	And then it was just ignored.
	I mean, just kick the can down the road.
	And look at the fiscal house that's on fire since then.
	I mean, just a completely different country.
	I try to remind people the debt of the U.S. in 2000 was $5 trillion, which sounds like a lot.
	I mean, it's a lot of money.
	But I mean, in comparison to what now?
	Close to $38 trillion?
	Whatever we're getting, $37, $38 trillion?
	Who really knows what the...
	The actual number is.
	And it's just a ballooning and accelerating rate.
	So, you know, none of this is going to end well.
	They have to have a new system.
	And let's just be honest.
	I applaud anything that's attempts are made to cut government spending and to cut the size of government.
	I mean, that's great.
	You know, I just don't want to rain on that parade just because it's a silly name.
	But I think that at the end of the day, unless you fix the currency, unless we have a real...
	I mean, meeting with reality on our currency and how all this works, it doesn't really matter because they're going to continue to go and hit print to inflate their way, and that's what it is.
	Currency creation is inflation.
	When you inflate your way out of war or welfare or whatever your need is, Again, that's what debases the currency.
	It creates the deficits.
	It creates all the problems.
	And so until we get that, our fiscal house in order with the currency, all the rest is just window dressing.
	That's right.
	Again, it's rearranging the deck chairs in the Titanic.
	And you look at what their solution is going to be to things.
	You know, for the longest time I've said, and Eric Peters said it last week too, he said, don't deport people, defund the welfare state for people coming into this country from other countries, right?
	You're incentivizing them to come in.
	But rather than stopping that, they can save some money there.
	But I guarantee you that rather than stopping the entitlements for foreigners that they've got, Which in many cases are superior to the entitlements for U.S. citizens.
	Rather than stopping that, what are they going to do?
	They're going to ramp up a fully militarized law enforcement thing.
	They're going to build detention camps and all the rest of the stuff.
	They're going to spend a lot of money on setting up biometric ID and all the rest of it.
	They're going to double down on the police and surveillance state, and that all costs money, but they're going to keep That welfare state going for people even that aren't U.S. citizens.
	It's insane to look at this government and, you know, again, I don't like to rain on people's parade, but, you know, I gotta say it's raining, you know?
	It's raining really bad.
	We've got a flood coming, I think.
	And nobody's looking at it.
	Everybody's just got stars in their eyes because we've got a new election and things are going to change and we're going to get out the current evil and we're going to bring another evil.
	It's starting to take shape in the background.
	And so I just want to get out of that system.
	You know, I look at the gold stuff, and I want to get out of this financial system.
	I want to get out of this coming stablecoin, Bitcoin, dollar trap that they're creating.
	I want to get out of the great taking as much as I can.
	I just want to get out of this whole system, and I want to go, you know, physical, private, and all the rest of this stuff with gold.
	And all, as we say every week, the fundamentals, unfortunately, have not changed.
	You know, when you look at geopolitical instability and wars and all the rest of the stuff, it's all still there.
	You know, everybody's euphoric and happy about changing of the guard, but it's not going to be that much of a change, I don't think.
	It's going to be different, but it's still going to be fundamentally the same, I think.
	That's exactly right.
	All this is, really, is an opportunity for you to prepare because, again, I think it's just a little bit of breathing room.
	The markets will be stable and somewhat because it's psychological.
	There's lots of liquidity hitting the market, which is what it craves, and it craves debt and currency creation.
	It's getting that right now.
	And we have a little bit of time.
	Gold, I think, is relative, even worth it being back over $2,600 an ounce, David.
	It's still relatively cheap, given the debasement of the dollar.
	And you're right about having physical metals outside of the system.
	I mean, which is a 5,000-year history that we have of precious metals.
	And it's going to be with us as long as there's human beings.
	There's going to be gold and silver will be known as some sort of monetary metal.
	It has uses outside the Of just being monetary too, you know, with medicine, with technology and other things, with jewelry.
	So we're always going to have it.
	It's part of our story.
	It's a good thing to have outside of the system because it houses value and energy.
	And again, gold and silver are just money.
	They're not really an investment.
	They just represent what money actually is.
	We don't need a gold standard by the U.S. government or a Bitcoin standard.
	We already have those.
	Just make them legal tender.
	That's what's funny about people.
	Our government has no standards.
	We had a gold standard from 19...
	44 to 1971, but you couldn't legally own gold either.
	I kind of like this system better.
	I already have a gold standard.
	I'm my own bank, or I have a Bitcoin standard, so I'm my own bank.
	When you start getting the government involved or talking about a crypto czar or whatever it is, I don't think it's necessary.
	The free market speaks for itself, and we already have these standards.
	They're worldwide.
	They're universally recognized and outside of the system.
	I love them.
	It's as unnecessary as a department of education.
	Yes.
	To have a department of crypto.
	I've got a question for you from Atomic Dog.
	He says, question for Tony.
	Have we seen the bottom of the profit-taking in silver and gold?
	What are you feeling?
	You kind of answered that.
	You know, I kind of think, as I've said, since this all happened, I said we got a Black Friday sale going on early with gold and silver.
	Well, I mean, I think the tensions with Ukraine and Russia, accelerated goals, rise back up, climb back up the ladder, because again, fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
	Just going back into precious metals, because it looks like the markets are going to get, you know, again, weird.
	They're unstable because the future is unset.
	It doesn't look like, you know, when Trump was elected, that little brief window that week or so where people were like, oh, we're going to avert World War III. Well, Biden said, hold my beer.
	Hold on, I'm on the way out, so let me see if I can get some ICBMs being launched over Ukraine.
	We certainly got that.
	And, I mean, who does...
	You know, really, stepping back logically, if you follow geopolitics or if you're interested in foreign policy, how insane is it that we have these British missiles and other things made by the West being authorized to be launched into Russian territory by the United States government in conjunction with Ukraine?
	If you'd have thought about that during the Cold War, David, you know how insane that would be.
	That's Cuban Missile Crisis level.
	Well, just go back to Dr. Strangelove.
	I mean, you know, these guys are like Jack D. Ripper, General Jack D. Ripper, the nut who set all this stuff off.
	That's really what this whole Biden regime and the British, they're all like that.
	They're like this crazy guy who wanted to set off a world war.
	They're all Jack D. Ripper.
	It's amazing.
	It truly is amazing.
	You said earlier.
	Sorry, go ahead.
	It really is, David.
	When you read these headlines, if you don't have any sort of background in reading about geopolitics over the 20th century, then it seems kind of, well, this is normal.
	It's not normal.
	This is way out of the context of anything that is sane.
	Yeah, they get us there gradually.
	You know, if we just backed up a couple years and people say, well, you're going to have the U.S. and the British are going to be firing their missiles, and we will be the ones doing the firing directly into Russia.
	It's like, what are you doing?
	You mentioned earlier that Trump's going to have a crypto thing.
	Has he named the baby yet?
	Is he going to name it after one of his failed casinos?
	Yeah.
	The Taj Mahal coin or something?
	The Mirage?
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	I didn't get the name of it yet.
	But he recently launched a...
	Remember the NFTs that he did as well a couple of years ago?
	Yeah.
	He's been in the space.
	I think he's going to continue to be in the space.
	Not him personally, but his brand for sure.
	He'll call it Truthcoin or something, right?
	Yeah.
	Probably that's what it's going to be.
	But he loves that.
	Well, you've got a program that's going to be following right after this one.
	And tell people a little bit about that.
	And anything that's happening other than, you know, just trying to keep up with the crazy markets as everything's getting crazier and crazier at Wise Wolf.
	Tell us what's going on there and what's coming up with your program.
	Well, thank you again, David, for having me on.
	Yeah, we're just keeping up with markets and keeping supply.
	It's harder than it looks, and I'm enjoying it.
	We've got, especially with these prices going all over the place, I think we've made, we'll probably make new invoices today based off of price and market conditions, but going into the holidays, and I've got some gifts going out to everybody in Wolfpack.
	pack i've just bought some uh stuff from you know christmas uh christmas type uh items and things that are going to be going in the packages so uh if you haven't joined wolf pack you ought to you get you'll get a christmas gift so go over to davidknight.gold and and check that out we got a lot new new items and variety going in there as well and yeah i've got my show uh the arterburn radio transmission once a week every thursday uh following my interview with you you can find me on x at tony arterburn
	and uh we've got the rockfin.com the america unplugged channel and rumble i'll be live over there so just uh just a little under an hour and we'll we'll uh have a conversation that's cool yeah oh that's neat uh you got uh some some gifts coming out for christmas maybe people get a copy of the song silver and gold from rudolph the red-nosed reindeer you have tony dressed up like clowns That's right.
	Always looking for silver and gold.
	And so the prospects are looking up for silver and gold as we get into these difficult times.
	It's always good to have a foundation of something that's real.
	And that's what we have to fall back on in so many different ways.
	And so that applies financially as well.
	Thank you so much for coming on, Tony.
	Again, Wise Wolf Gold.
	You can get there with davidknight.gold and stay tuned right after the show for Tony's show.
	Thank you so much, Tony.
	Thank you, David.
	All right, folks, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right.
	Thank you, Joe's 389W.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	It's a good show.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	And Ephesians 6:12.
	Thank you so much.
	He says, "David, it isn't much, but I wanted to say thank you." No, it is.
	I really do appreciate that.
	Thank you for presenting the news the way that you do.
	Breath of fresh air.
	Thank you.
	Let's talk a little bit more about Kissinger, because I really didn't get to, and I haven't, again, read this book that I bought a month ago.
	I've got books that have piled up, because people send me books besides the ones that I get to read.
	Over Thanksgiving, I will be able to read that.
	But Kissinger's final book, not this one, The Age of AI and Our Human Future with Eric Schmidt, but he did another one Eric Schmidt put together with a former executive from Microsoft.
	And it is called, they said it's his last work, and it is called, I'm looking for the title here, Genesis.
	There's nothing pretentious about that, right?
	That's what he calls it, Genesis.
	Yeah, it is the beginning, God.
	I don't want to hear Henry Kissinger reading the Bible, any part of it.
	As a matter of fact, it was his last warning to people.
	He says, prepare now for superhuman people to control the earth.
	He should have been preparing to meet his God.
	But instead he was doing this stuff.
	And you know, they've been prepping us, haven't they, for all this stuff.
	We talk all the time about how Hollywood has, since the mid-20th century, They've done all these, you know, Day the Earth Stood Still stuff and everything where, you know, we come in peace.
	All these space aliens are going to be coming to visit us and the UFOs and everything.
	So they've been preparing us for that thing.
	How would they roll that out?
	But they've also been preparing us for the superhuman people, haven't they?
	The supers, as Syndrome called it in The Incredibles, right?
	And...
	And so this is a big part of the transhumanist thing.
	And I guess, you know, if everybody is super, then nobody is super.
	And that's what they're trying to tell you, that you have to join the machine, as Elon Musk has said so many times.
	You're going to have to become a cyborg, because otherwise these people are going to have superpowers that they obtain through technology.
	They have hit us over and over again with this whole superhero genre, just like the aliens and the UFO genres and everything, and there's a reason for that.
	These people sit around, you think that...
	You think these Trump prophets are getting a lying spirit in their mouth about this stuff?
	Just look at what happens in Hollywood.
	And we've talked in the past about people in Hollywood who said, I'm channeling spirits.
	I'm laying down on the couch, and I'm channeling spirits to get these scripts.
	And they don't even have to do it that way.
	They can just go to...
	The CIA had a website for that where they said, hey, we've got all these scripts that we'll give you if you're a Hollywood writer.
	We'll give you ideas.
	Or we'll even write the script for you, whatever, you know, and you can fill in the characters and so forth.
	But we'll give you the broad outlines of the grand scheme of this thing.
	And so they're always pushing those kinds of things.
	That's why we see so many instances of predictive programming in movies.
	And I think this is one of those types of things.
	So, Henry Kissinger, humanity must be making preparations no longer in charge of the Earth because of AI. The rise of AI creating superhuman people is a major topic of concern in this book, Genesis.
	Again, this is coming from a guy who, you know, the king of Bilderberg for all of these years and so many of these other things.
	But it is also all of this stuff, these projects, were really coming from DARPA, from the Pentagon, from NATO, all these U.S.-led governments and organizations, this global satanic cabal.
	Kissinger's co-authors, CEO Eric Schmidt, and Microsoft senior executive Craig Mundy, who I don't know anything about, finished the combined work after Kissinger's death.
	Schmidt and Mundy said that they were among the last people to speak with Kissinger, and they sought to honor his dying request to finish the manuscript.
	So, literally ghostwriting here.
	Warning that AI tools have already started outpacing human capacities so that people might need to consider biologically engineering themselves to ensure that they're not rendered inferior or wiped out by an advanced machine.
	This is the same type of thing that you hear from Elon all the time, that you're going to have to do that in order to survive.
	They're going to consistently sell this message of fear.
	The message of fear is going to be coming from Elon Musk that now the conservatives love and trust and see as their savior.
	And it's going to be coming from people that the left likes and trusts, like Eric Schmidt and people of the ilk of Henry Kissinger, who's no longer here, trying to navigate our role when we will no longer be the only or even the principal actors on our planet.
	Current efforts to integrate humans with machine include brain-computer interfaces.
	Oh, well, we're back to Elon Musk again, taking the lead in that.
	And the U.S. military identified last year as one of the utmost importance.
	You have to understand, folks, that Elon Musk is a defense contractor.
	When we look at the very first contest that DARPA put out, it was self-driving cars.
	And that was a tip from the very beginning where he was coming from, to me at least.
	And, of course, following up, famously they had the, after Fukushima, DARPA put together the robotics contest.
	There was about 10 or 12 different robotics companies there.
	Boston Dynamics and one other were the only ones who were able to complete the obstacle course.
	And then Google bought, you know, most of the robot companies that were able to complete the course.
	But again, that was pushed by DARPA. You know, we have to have these robots who are going to be able to go in, and if we've got a problem like Fukushima, shut down the reactor so we don't put any humans at risk.
	You know, that's the—and it's going to help little old ladies cross the street, that type of thing.
	The authors also raise the prospect of a society that chooses to create a hereditary genetic line of people specifically designed to work better with forthcoming AI tools.
	So we're not talking about just robotics and artificial intelligence.
	We're also talking about genetics.
	They've got everything there but the nanotech, and I'm sure that comes in in some way or the other.
	So it caused the human race, they said, to split into multiple lines, and some will be infinitely more powerful than others.
	You know, we go back and we look at the story of Noah, right?
	And there's two trains of thoughts about this, you know, within Christians looking at it.
	When it says that Noah was perfect in his generation, that's the way it's translated in some of them.
	Well, perfect can also mean complete.
	And so you could look at this and say, well, Noah was a good guy, and he was a good guy, right?
	God makes it clear that he was a good guy.
	Was he perfect?
	Well, no, nobody's perfect.
	Noah had his faults, as we would later see after the ship landed.
	But nevertheless, you could look at it and say, okay, well, he was a righteous man.
	He was trying to follow God, but was he perfect?
	Another way that some people looked at it is that he was perfect in terms of complete in his generations or in terms of his humanity.
	He was complete.
	The idea that there had already been a lot of tampering in the antediluvian society where there was this kind of hybrids or chimera or whatever that's allusions to that, many people believe, in Genesis 6. And so, we're told, as in the days of Noah, it'll be that way in the last time.
	Some people believe that that may be referring to the kind of corruption of genetics that they are now openly talking about.
	The augmentation of human mental capacity with AI and other things, with the brain-computer interface, genetic modification, creating multiple lines of humans.
	This is what they're going to try to do.
	They may be allowed to do it.
	Who knows?
	Or God may pull the plug on this whole thing.
	He won't drain it.
	He's already pulled the plug after the flood, but he may just stop it with this.
	They said, a simultaneous biological and psychological reliance.
	Well, we fight this by not relying on that.
	We fight this by not making a god out of AI. No single culture, they said, should expect to dictate to another the morality of the intellects on which it would be relying.
	Now, what does that sound like?
	Well, it sounds like a global religion, doesn't it?
	How dare you have your religion, your country, your culture?
	You shouldn't be allowed to dictate that to other people.
	They go on to say, so for each country, machines would have to learn different rules, formal, informal, moral, legal, religious.
	No, folks.
	Everything that these people have done in their life, especially Henry Kissinger, he is the ultimate globalist, the guy who wants a single world government with these guys in charge.
	And so they're not talking about different states and everybody being able to do their own thing.
	They're not talking about diversity at all.
	They're talking about centralization of control.
	Just take a look at the EU. Has that created more diversity or less?
	It's about creating a homogenized, centrally controlled, unified by culture, by religion, by law, all the rest of this stuff.
	That's what they're talking about.
	And so, what they're laying out here is the groundwork for a global governance, a global religion, laying the groundwork for this transhumanist genetic modification of humans.
	All this is a religion.
	Kissinger, Schmidt, and Mundy urged greater attention to aligning machines with human values, their values.
	The trio also said that they would prefer that no artificial general intelligence surpassing humanity's intellect is allowed to emerge unless it is properly aligned with the human species.
	The author said they are rooting for humanity's survival.
	You believe that?
	No, they have been doing everything they can to kill us.
	They want to get rid of 90 plus percent of everybody.
	That's how they look.
	When you look at all this stuff and they play this game with a great taking and everything, right?
	Well, you know, we got you now.
	We played this little game with terms of service and you agreed to this and you agreed to that.
	When they take everything from everybody, as Gerald Slenty says, people are going to lose it when they lose everything.
	And they know that as well.
	I mean, before they do this, or as they're doing it, they've got to be killing us.
	Because there are so many of us, they would never get away with it unless they reduce the population.
	That's why they are so adamant about this.
	Training an AI to understand us and then sitting back and hoping that it respects us...
	It's not a strategy that seems either safe or likely to succeed.
	And I would say the same thing is true of government, right?
	Training government to respect us, to understand us.
	Telling government, we've got this constitution, you need to abide by it.
	What a very good strategy, is it?
	I don't think that that is going to work either.
	And so, you know, we will see what happens in the future, but I really don't think that's going to work.
	What is the matter with this thing?
	It's acting weird on me right now.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break because I can't figure out what this thing is doing to me now.
	And we will be right back as soon as I can.
	Wait a minute.
	I think I've got it.
	I think I've got it.
	No, it's not going to do it there.
	We're going to take a real short break.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We're back and I got this thing working here.
	I want to talk about something.
	This is very interesting because we've talked about the abortion pill.
	And there's a chance, if somebody has second thoughts, and a lot of women do, there is a chance after you've taken the abortion pill that you can reverse it up to a period of time.
	And I saw this article, and the thing I thought was interesting about it was not that this woman talked about her experience of having the abortion reversal.
	She was able to stop it.
	She now has a healthy young baby girl.
	But I thought it was interesting because it was the Alliance Defending Freedom.
	It's a legal group who's writing all of this stuff and talking about it.
	I thought, what's the deal with that?
	Well, it turns out that there are bans in some of these radically pro-abortion states.
	They want to ban women from changing their mind and stopping the abortion.
	Doesn't that tell you everything?
	Doesn't that tell you everything about Planned Parenthood?
	They don't want you changing your mind.
	Doesn't it tell you everything about New York and Colorado and these other places?
	They just want to kill babies.
	They don't want the woman to choose.
	They're going to tell you what to choose.
	They're going to criminally charge you if you choose to keep your baby.
	Here's her story.
	My name is McKenna and in January 2024, I attempted a chemical abortion.
	My story, our story, actually starts in late December 2023 when I had found out that I was pregnant.
	And I just remember being flooded with an array of emotions, none of which, I'll be honest, were Happy or joyful or excited.
	Sorry, it's difficult to look at her and know that that's what I thought one day.
	So, a couple days later, I had ordered an abortion pill protocol online and they shipped that right to my door and I did take the first pill in that protocol.
	Immediately upon taking it and in the days leading up, I knew that that was not the right decision for me.
	But I continued to convince myself that it was, that it was the right decision for me, my family.
	And, um, once I let reality hit me, that that was a major mistake.
	I reached out to abortion pill reversal and they provided me with life-saving care for me, for her.
	And they put me in contact with a nurse practitioner, Chelsea Minnick, who prescribed me that progesterone.
	And it's absolutely because of her and that abortion pill reversal medication that I get to look at her beautiful face today.
	So, I want every woman that was ever in my position to know that this is an option and it clearly works.
	I can't thank abortion for reversal enough for the help that they provided and Chelsea for hers.
	I currently live in a state where The abortion to a reversible is not legal.
	It's not legal for a provider to provide medication, but it's legal for me to obtain a chemical abortion.
	So, again, I... I just want other women to know that this is a viable option and there are so many resources that can help and provide that life-saving care.
	Thank you so much for listening.
	You know, I cover this and that is something I did not know.
	That it's actually illegal to try to reverse your abortion in these states.
	That tells us everything that we need to know about where they're coming from.
	It's just like when I had that epiphany about the partial birth abortion.
	It's like, oh, wait a minute.
	There's no question at this point that this is a baby.
	So I think I understand what your agenda is now.
	I think we understand what their agenda is now.
	She lives in Colorado.
	And think about this.
	This is an individual in Colorado that was Minnick and is the baby and McKenna is the mother or vice versa.
	I'm not sure which is which.
	And so she is currently suing to challenge Colorado's law after you had an individual who found out about the abortion reversal, filed a complaint with the Colorado Board of Nursing, sparking an investigation, and now the ADF is a part of that lawsuit.
	Isn't that amazing?
	You got some government, some snitch Who report them to the government and the government is coming after them.
	And so Colorado became the first state to ban providers from giving abortion pill reversal.
	And so now they want to come after the mother and the baby.
	Remember this story.
	Whenever you hear all of these stories that Planned Parenthood and the baby killers want to put out there about, well, you know, this mom, her life is in danger or this baby's life is in danger so he had to kill the baby.
	Or whatever it is.
	And it's just horrible that they don't have any choice.
	As I've said for the longest time, these people, where were they when we had the masks and the mandates and the lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff?
	My body, my choice.
	They were never anywhere around.
	But this is even more specific.
	If your choice is to reverse that abortion pill, that's banned.
	We want you to choose to kill your baby, and once you make that, we don't want you having any ability to move back one way or the other.
	How does this work?
	Well, the Alliance Defending Freedom, in terms of the medical side of this, says the abortion pill reversal works.
	They said there's chemical abortions involve two drugs.
	Mefepristone and mysoprostol.
	Mysoprostol, I guess.
	I just call it mephistopheles.
	It's the same thing.
	These pills taken in succession can end a pregnancy.
	The first one is meant to kill the unborn baby by blocking progesterone, a naturally occurring hormone needed to sustain pregnancy.
	Many women experience the same regret that McKenna.
	That's the mom's McKenna then.
	They experience the same regret that McKenna experienced after taking it.
	There is a window of time between the first and the second abortion drugs during which the effects of the first one may be reversed and the baby may be saved.
	Again, just giving them the progesterone which the first pill is designed to block.
	Women like McKenna, who regret taking the first pill, Our prescribed progesterone to try to offset the impact of mephistopheles.
	ADF claims that there is research showing 64-68% of the time these pregnancies can be saved if medicine is administered at the right time.
	This is why the legal group is there.
	Well, Colorado was the first one to make this illegal, but New York is also there.
	And they both want to stop any abortion pill reversal therapies.
	No, we're not going to allow that.
	And so, abortions, says Attorney General Letitia James.
	This is the same political hack.
	Who came after Donald Trump so much, right?
	And many other people.
	I mean, she came after Alex and forced him to stop selling silver toothpaste during COVID. I don't know if he said that it cured...
	I don't think he said it cured COVID. But she said, you implied that it did so.
	They just shut down all their silver stuff all at once.
	She's going after people all over the place.
	Letitia James...
	This political hack says abortions cannot be reversed.
	Well, they can.
	She just doesn't want them to be.
	She said any treatments that claim to do so are made without scientific evidence and could be unsafe.
	And she's played that game over and over again.
	She played it again with silver.
	Well, here's your evidence.
	Do you see that living baby there?
	That's evidence right there.
	So she wants to make abortion legal.
	She wants to make abortion reversal illegal.
	She sued crisis pregnancy centers in New York earlier this year because they advertised abortion pill reversal.
	She called it false and misleading.
	Heartbeat International, one of her targets, has hit back with its own lawsuit and scored a preliminary injunction and protection to keep sharing information on abortion pill reversal.
	This is a key thing.
	This really shows the heart of these people.
	It really shows the tyranny of this political hack.
	She'll do anything for Planned Parenthood, and she'll do anything to get her name out there.
	And I really would like to see Trump take her down.
	The problem is that he'll do it in a way to make a martyr out of her.
	She'll become a martyr to the political left, just like Trump became a martyr to the political right because of what she was doing to him.
	But I hope he comes after her good and hard.
	She certainly deserves it.
	You've got all these leftist media and movie celebrities talking about government force being used against a woman to stop the murder of babies, and yet they're going to use the force of government to stop a baby from being saved.
	Well, I liked this article.
	I thought this was very interesting, and it is from Aaron Wren's Substack.
	And it's about It's a Wonderful Life, one of my favorite films.
	George Bailey, he says, is the Protestant elite that we need.
	And why is he saying that?
	Well, because he's a Catholic.
	He's a Catholic writer.
	He has a substack called The Social Pathologist.
	And he said, as he's looking at it as a Catholic, he says, Protestantism is superior to Catholicism and adapting to modernity in it.
	And he points to George Bailey as the archetype of the Protestant man.
	He says, it brings me to the movie, It's a Wonderful Life.
	He said, I've always enjoyed the movie.
	And let me just say, this is not about Catholic versus Protestant.
	It's about...
	The qualities that we need in terms of how do we rescue our society?
	What kind of leadership do we need?
	And that's really what he's talking about.
	I mean, he's a Catholic.
	He's not criticizing Catholics.
	But he's talking about, you know, essentially the Protestant work ethic or some of these other things that we've always talked about.
	He said, brings me to the movie, It's a Wonderful Life.
	He said, I've always enjoyed it, but only recently have seen some of its deeper theological significance.
	He says, while Catholicism has been a factory of saints, Protestantism has been a factory of George Bailey's.
	He says, yeah, Jimmy Stewart was the perfect person for the role.
	It is true that he's a fictional character, but he is also an archetype of the type of man that we all know and the type of high-minded Protestant man who's slowly disappearing due to cultural forces that have been unleashed since the 60s.
	Although the movie is fictional, it unnervingly is beginning to resemble real life.
	Bedford Falls may be a fictional town, but I remember the world I grew up in strongly resembling it, and the world I live in now is slowly turning into Pottersville.
	I felt that way when I did It's a Wonderful Lie, even to the extent one of the scenes there where he comes across...
	What's it?
	Ernie the taxi driver and Bert the cop, I think.
	And Bert the cop, you know, says, I'm taking him to rest.
	And he kind of shoves him and runs off.
	And with a big crowd of people there, Bert the cop pulls out his gun and starts shooting at him as he's running away.
	And it's like, yeah, that's the world that we live in today.
	You know, the rules of engagement.
	Shoot somebody in the back as they're running from you.
	They're not a threat to you or anything.
	And in the middle of a crowd, you know, he's shooting a gun.
	But that's kind of the world that we live in.
	Because we have had our world turned into Pottersville.
	By the Federal Reserve and by many of these other aspects.
	But he says that he takes it broader than just the Federal Reserve.
	He says the genius of the movie is the depiction of what the world would have looked like without George Bailey.
	And he said the irony of this movie is that it was made by a Catholic, he says.
	Now, I do have disagreements with Protestantism, but my intention here is to praise one of its strengths, and its strength was to produce thousands of George Baileys, who in various fields, and in their own way, small way, were able to transform the world.
	He said, Protestantism at its best produced the goods and brought Christianity to the day-to-day affairs of men.
	He said there's actually two great Protestant archetypes in the film, George Bailey and Mr. Potter.
	Potter, like Ebenezer Scrooge, is an example of what happens when the Protestant ethic is combined with avariciousness and a lack of charity.
	And, of course, Potter was patterned after J.P. Morgan.
	They made that pretty clear.
	It would have been common for the president of a local bank to be the most powerful person in town, and that's Potter here, a genuine, wealthy elite.
	Bailey is not at all at that level.
	He never becomes personally wealthy.
	He's not really elite in the social status sense, but he runs the Building and Loan, which appears to be the second largest financial institution in town.
	That alone grants him status.
	What's key to Bailey is his institutional orientation and his civic mindset.
	Bailey takes over the building and loan after his father's death and treats it as his personal responsibility to sustain.
	To sustain that institution through depression, through war, through relentless outside attacks by Potter.
	He said, this guy wrote a book, he said, you'll note, this chapter of my book, you'll note that I talk about the three dimensions of trustworthiness, competence, and missional integrity.
	That's what we should be looking for in leaders, right?
	That's why I say character matters.
	You know, there's the issue of trustworthiness.
	Can you trust this person?
	If you can't trust them, even if they're competent, Even if they've got a mission that they want to have, but they're not trustworthy.
	So you have to have all three of those.
	Trustworthiness, competence, and missional integrity.
	And he says, you have to have that in order to sustain An institution, even, for the long term.
	We see that Bailey hits all of these dimensions.
	What makes Potter's theft of $8,000 particularly painful is that it will falsely make Bailey himself look like a thief.
	Look untrustworthy.
	Bailey's life is also shaped by a general ethos of civic-mindedness.
	As a kid, he saves his brother from drowning.
	He stands up to the pharmacist to prevent an accidental poisoning.
	He doesn't just practice these individual acts of charity.
	He keeps the building and loan on mission.
	Providing accessible financing to allow ordinary citizens to buy quality housing at a reasonable price.
	As the social pathologist says in his analysis, he said, the genius of the film is that it shows us what the world would have been like without George Bailey.
	Bailey didn't just save or improve the lives of individual people, although he did do that, but he changed the entire trajectory of Bedford Falls for the better.
	It's very relevant that Bailey was essentially a sub-elite.
	The incumbent institutions and power structures of Bedford Falls represented by Potter and his bank are corrupt.
	And the Baileys are disruptors.
	This is what we need to think about in the world that we live in here, right?
	The elites, the people running everything, are corrupt.
	But he's a level below that.
	And he acts as a disruptor.
	They build a new outsider institution to bypass the corruption and to ultimately heal or at least to preserve the town.
	In other words, a parallel system.
	A parallel institution, if you will.
	And this is what we need to focus on.
	Because the upper level is corrupt.
	You know, Washington certainly, maybe even the state, maybe even your local government, right?
	But at some level, we have to start to create a parallel system.
	Today, many of our institutions and power structures are likewise corrupt.
	Certainly, at least, they're off mission, and they're functioning poorly.
	Real elite leadership today will often involve the same approach, building new institutions that can sustain and improve community life.
	What's different for Protestants today is that we no longer live in George Bailey's Christian America.
	Protestant civic-mindedness today will look different from the past, and it will undoubtedly mean more focus on institutions to serve its own community specifically.
	This is how minorities operate, and religious American Protestants are now the minority.
	He said, comparing George Bailey to the modern American evangelical, we see that the modern evangelicals are typically anti-institutional, with low degrees of civic-mindedness apart from evangelistic outreach and mercy ministries.
	This is one reason why, despite their number, evangelicals are so low-impact in our society.
	And this is what needs to change.
	There's another lesson to be learned from It's a Wonderful Life.
	Sometimes you choose your duties, and sometimes your duties choose you.
	George Bailey didn't want to run the building and loan.
	He wanted to go to college.
	He wanted to travel the world.
	He wanted to have a honeymoon.
	In every one of these cases, he had to fold that away and not pursue his own dreams.
	He saw a need.
	He stepped into the gap.
	He chose to store up treasures in heaven rather than on earth.
	And so then that brings us back to what do we do, right?
	We're not always in a situation where Like Mike Johnson, who was tested and failed, where we can stand up and we can offer integrity and we can offer a vision to the world, apart from this insanity, where we can bring sanity to the situation.
	No, he failed in that mission.
	He went weak.
	He went wobbly.
	We may not be in a situation where we have the ability or the power or the visibility of the Speaker of the House.
	But there's another institution that all of us are a part of in one way or the other, and that's the family.
	God created that institution.
	That makes it very important.
	You know, people created Congress, not nearly as important as the family that God created.
	And we can all do what we can to make that institution work.
	That's part of our daily challenge with that.
	And as you see with George Bailey, whether he wanted to go to college or honeymoon or any of these other things, he folded that up and he pursued what was really his duty.
	And I see that so many times with homeschooling families who set aside their dreams, who are no longer lovers of themselves.
	That's the key.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	He said, being made in 1946. This is a product of a bygone America.
	It disappeared.
	It disappeared along with the family.
	It disappeared because people became self-centered, the me generations, sexual gratification, the rest of this stuff.
	People became simply just lovers of themselves.
	They put themselves first.
	And that's not what we're called to do.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Donald Frag Me Bro says, Parallel economic systems on a local level were used during the Great Depression and used successfully.
	Absolutely right.
	They had parallel currencies in many cases as well.
	They'd create for the community.
	Community coins that could be used within that community maybe wouldn't.
	There's some museums in North Carolina where they have some of the coins that were made during the Great Depression.
	And people had a...
	They had a very different perspective.
	Right after World War II, about the time this movie was made, you had some soldiers came back to Athens, Tennessee.
	And there was a corrupt sheriff there.
	Local corrupt government.
	Yeah, corruption can happen at any level.
	But they took care of it at the local level.
	It was called the Battle of Athens.
	You can look that up.
	There's been movies made about it.
	But the Battle of Athens, these World War II soldiers, literally, you know, guns and bombs, you know, to the sheriff who's barricading him in, he's rigging the elections and all the rest of this stuff.
	People would take things into their own hands and they would not just be passive slaves to that.
	And they did the right thing.
	Um...
	Potter is a modern-day equivalent of BlackRock.
	JJWB for fun.
	Smartphones destroyed humans and their ability to unite.
	They don't even think about coming together in reality.
	People are apart from each other even when they're together because of the smartphone.
	They're in different worlds.
	Well, a 16-year-old girl survives a stroke caused by unusually stubborn blood clots.
	I wonder what that could be, you know?
	This is the real poison that nobody wants to talk about, as everybody was talking about.
	Look at this.
	RFK Jr. had what he calls poison food on Trump's private jet.
	He had McDonald's and all the rest of his stuff.
	Well, this is what needs to be talked about.
	Instead, while that is happening, Trump takes a victory lap about his vaccines yet again.
	And about his medical martial law yet again.
	All these things that he did.
	It was once vanishingly rare for a teenager to have a stroke or a heart attack.
	Now it's become unfortunately common.
	It was once extremely rare for a blood clot to cause a stroke to be unresponsive to any of the typical treatments designed to dissolve that clot.
	Yet a 16-year-old girl who recently survived a stroke is far from being the only one of these types of cases in recent years.
	Well, you know, autism was once vanishingly rare as well, but unfortunately not.
	She began to suddenly feel numb and then lost all feeling and power of movement on the right side of her body.
	Her speech became slurred.
	Alarmed school staff had her rush to the hospital where an urgent MRI scan revealed a blockage in an artery in her brain.
	Doctors described it as unusually stubborn and resistant to conventional stroke catheterization techniques.
	Eventually, they were forced to implant a stent During a four-hour-long brain surgery.
	During surgery, it was discovered that the carotid artery was blocked at its origin.
	Following the operation, the girl was therefore transferred for further tests, which revealed a huge mass that was described by the media as a tumor.
	On the mitral valve of her heart.
	The tumor was so large that it had started to break up, which seemed to explain the stroke as one part of it had apparently made its way to the carotid artery.
	16-year-olds having strokes.
	What could cause that?
	Well, one of the doctors involved in the girl's case described the unusual nature of what he saw.
	He said this is extremely rare.
	He said stroke cases of this kind are more commonly seen in patients between the ages of 60 and 70. It's exceedingly rare in a 16-year-old, especially when there's also a heart tumor involved.
	He also noted that treatment was unusually difficult.
	He offered no suggestion as to why this might have been the case.
	But three years ago, a similar story reached the media of a 16-year-old teenage boy who, like the girl, had been completely healthy prior.
	The boy developed a large blood clot in the carotid artery as well.
	Further parallels to the girl's case, conventional treatment for blood clots failed to resolve this situation.
	So the question is, is it blood clots or is it something else?
	This is coming from the Gold Report, as a matter of fact.
	Calling these arterial blockages blood clots.
	It's possibly misleading according to many physicians and others who have seen these clots and have handled them.
	In fact most of the little that is known about these clots comes from embalmers rather than from doctors.
	The embalmers are less vulnerable to pressure to keep quiet about what they're seeing.
	Doctors by contrast face the loss of their professional reputation and even of their medical license.
	Dr. Ryan Cole discovered that when he began revealing what he found in autopsy patients.
	Embalmers such as John O'Looney from the UK and Richard Hirschman from the US have, however, risked censure by speaking out and even publishing pictures of these blood clots, and we've seen them, these long, white, fibrous things.
	And that's why they resist what would normally clear out a real blood clot.
	A recent study set out to answer a similar question and discovered that clots found in the brain are 112,000 percent more likely to occur following COVID vaccination than after the flu vaccine.
	And compared to other vaccines, the COVID shot is 20,700 percent more likely to lead to a brain clot.
	Researchers use data from VAERS, the federal government's own post-vaccination reporting system, which in itself is not complete because they don't want all of this information in there.
	And so when we look at where we go from with this, let me just say as what needs to happen to do something about this.
	Well, there's six simple steps that are absolutely necessary for pharmaceutical reform.
	Brownstone has the article, and here's what they say are the six simple steps.
	Number one, repeal the 1980 By Dole Act.
	Birch By, Robert Dole.
	1980. What was that?
	That was the patent and trademark law that allowed universities that are getting government grants, it allows them to develop something and to keep all the patent money for it, right?
	And the same thing, it also allows places like the NIH government agencies to patent and get royalties for the things that they produce.
	And so that needs to be stopped.
	Of course, the other things that are there that we all know, the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act that keeps them from being sued for doing injuries to children.
	Of course, that needs to go.
	The 2005 PrEP Act.
	Which gives them, again, legal immunity for anything that they do as part of a national emergency.
	Getting rid of the direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising, which is really about buying the media.
	And now the media is completely owned and beholden to Pfizer, Moderna, and these other pharmaceutical companies and will not report on what is happening there.
	And then he talks about the 2004...
	Project BioShield Act.
	This is one that I had not seen, so I was interested in that.
	That was signed into law by George W. Bush in 2004, one year before he did the PREP Act.
	And that introduced the Emergency Use Authorization, which we have heard so much about.
	Among other things, this law empowered the FDA to authorize unapproved products for emergency use.
	And during the so-called pandemic...
	We saw this used hundreds of times.
	As a matter of fact, the FDA issued nearly 400 emergency use authorizations related to COVID for pharmaceutical and for medical products.
	For medical products as well, for treatments.
	And so, you know, we all know about the so-called vaccines, the Trump shot.
	But it's a lot of these things.
	And so over 400 of those were done just during that.
	With regard to COVID-related pharmaceuticals, to this day...
	Emergency use authorizations, EUAs, continue to be misused to the benefit of big pharma and to the detriment of citizens.
	For example, when the FDA announced the new formulation of COVID boosters for 2024 to 2025, the ones that we've got right now, they still released these new products under emergency use authorization.
	Even now, they're still putting out new versions of the Trump shot with emergency use authorization.
	In other words, a full four and a half years after the start of the COVID pandemic, these products are still rushed to market after ludicrously inadequate safety and efficacy trials based on a purported emergency that is now approaching a half decade in length.
	The 2004 BioShield Act So, again, these are things that could be done.
	You know, these are just acts where they gave themselves money to, you know, a couple of these things are about them getting money, a couple of these things about them not to have to pay any money, when it's all about the money, isn't it?
	Yeah, the love of money, the root of all evil.
	These people will kill you.
	...will kill you and your family for the tens of billions of dollars.
	And the media will lie to you and cover it up for their tens of billions of dollars.
	Have a good day.
	...in fighting COVID under rules established by health experts.
	One would have to...
	...the common man...
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲