Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 12, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:31

Tue 12Nov24 David Knight UNABRIDGED Trump Technocrats' Public/Private Partnership for DeFacto CBDC, Blockchain Carbon Taxes

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 12th of November, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well today, well actually as yesterday, we had COP29 begin.
	It's the 29th time that the UN has brought people together to steal our lives, our money, our liberty, our constitutions, our governments, our culture, everything.
	And we can now see, if we look at the appointment of Lee Zeldin, And if we look at Elon Musk and we look at Lutnik as a transition guy, we can now see the contours of the carbon tax gang around Donald Trump that is going to usher in a stealth CBDC using blockchain carbon taxes.
	Yeah, see, it's very much like what Biden wanted to do, except this is a little bit more devious and subtle.
	It is a public-private partnership to outsource the tyranny.
	This is what we always get.
	They come at you straight ahead with stupid people like Lala and Biden, or they come at you with very subtle, smart people in a devious way.
	We'll talk about that to start with.
	with we'll be right back well we have at cop 29 we have 50 000 plus climate doomers i I like that a lot better than alarmists.
	Or chicken littles, even.
	I like doomer.
	Because when these people start hectoring us, you know, Greta starts hectoring us, how dare you?
	We can just reply, okay, doomer.
	And just let it go at that.
	I don't really care what they say.
	The doomers.
	The doomers are going to Azerbaijan.
	Oil-rich Azerbaijan.
	And, of course, what is on the menu right now is a massive transfer of wealth.
	Now, we're told that, just as we see domestically, you know, we have to help the poor, so we're going to steal money from the rich, and we're going to give it to the poor.
	Well, they always take it from the middle class, don't they?
	And now we're told that the rich countries have got to pay taxes and reparations to the poor countries.
	Except where it's going to be coming from is the middle class, as always.
	Just like when you have internal taxation, it always comes from middle class.
	That's the headline on the agenda.
	This reparations stuff.
	But we're going to talk about the contours of what is happening with the Trump personnel.
	And again, personnel is policy.
	You think it doesn't matter what these people, where they come from, what they've been doing?
	You know, yesterday we talked about Susie Wiles being a lobbyist for Bill Gates and a lot of the pharmaceutical companies.
	Let me tell you, the connections to these greenwash grifters in the Trump administration, the people who are running the transition team, The people who bought Trump, like Elon Musk, these green grifters, they've got a massive scheme that is very subtle, very dangerous, very complex.
	And, of course, it all revolves around blockchain and crypto as well.
	It is a backdoor into central bank digital currency, but, of course, they're going to be able to make profit by running this as well.
	And the MAGA people never see it.
	Trump will be a pacifier for them.
	Oh yeah, it's Trump.
	Everything is fixed.
	I mean, I continually see everywhere, even people who do good research, and we'll talk about that coming up, are saying, well, you know, Trump did get us out of the Paris Climate Accord in the first term.
	No, he didn't!
	He never got us out of the Paris Climate Accord.
	He said in 2017, after much internal debate within his administration, you had Rex Tillerson and you had Ivanka Trump arguing that we had to stay in it.
	You had some of the more subtle people say, well, you know, we're never really officially in it, so you don't have to get out.
	And then we had other people like Scott Pruitt and some of the good people that he began his administration with.
	He had some good people at the EPA. And I said, no, you have to say that we're out of it.
	But the reality is, and Steve Malloy talked about this as well, I had him on, I talked about it at the beginning when all this stuff was happening.
	Look at the dictionary.
	The definition of in and out, right?
	Don't you have to be in something before you can get out of something?
	Yeah.
	We were never in it.
	We never had that treaty confirmed by the Senate.
	Never.
	There was never a vote.
	And we talked about that.
	We talked about how phony it was.
	How you had John Kerry, who was Secretary of the State at the time.
	He said, Obama and I have self-ratified this.
	You can't self-ratify a treaty.
	That's nowhere in the Constitution.
	People should have called BS with that.
	And the people who should have called BS on it were the Republican senators.
	Where was Mitch McConnell?
	Where was Mike Lee?
	Where was Rand Paul?
	These guys that talk about the Constitution all the time.
	They never said a thing about it.
	They just let it go.
	And so, after the election, I had Steve Malloy on.
	Who does JunkScience.com.
	He's very good.
	Very good researcher.
	He knows what's going on.
	As a matter of fact, he was a guy who was kind of working with the same group that I was with at the time that I went to Infowars in 2012.
	He discovered the fact that EPA was hooking people up to diesel tailpipes.
	Yeah, they filtered out the stuff that would immediately kill people.
	The carbon monoxide.
	But they were hooking people up, looking for people who had heart and respiratory issues, and hooking them up right there in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, where I lived.
	And trying to ramp up the regulations, trying to come up with a justification to ramp up the regulations to not only shut down diesel, but to shut down fireplaces and barbecues, burning of anything.
	Burning of anything was going to create fine particulate matter 2.5, right?
	2.5 nanometers.
	And I did a report on it.
	It's the first report I did at Infowars.
	I said, look at their website on the EPA. I said, they show the Smoky Mountains and talk about fine particulate matter 2.5 and how we've got to shut down all manufacturing, all burning of anything.
	I said, that's not why the Smoky Mountains are called the Smoky Mountains.
	And then they took it down.
	But I saved it in my report.
	I took a screenshot of it in my report.
	So this stuff has been going around for a long time.
	And as they were exposing people to over 72 times what the limit they said was.
	And while all this was happening, you had then-EPA Director Lisa Jackson going on Capitol Hill with a hearing with then-Congressman Markey, who is now Senator Markey, And they had worked out a little script between the two of them, a dialogue, saying, well, Senator, I'm not talking about people getting sick.
	I'm talking about people dying.
	And there's more people dying of fine particulate matter than there are of cancer and heart disease.
	A kind of narrative that we would see again with COVID. And, of course, it was all a lie.
	And while they were doing that, she was head of the agency that was hooking people up to diesel exhaust.
	and looking for sick people I mean this is this is disgusting but I had Steve Malloy I took that Steve Malloy discovered all that and I had Steve Malloy on after the election in 2020 and we talked about it he issued a plea he was writing about it at junk science he said please you know we need to call the bluff on this treaty Because Trump said, I'm going to get out of it in 2017.
	But according to the treaty, they put a clause in there, and I believe it's just for the United States, saying that if you decide that you're going to exit this treaty, you've got to give us four years' advance notice.
	Which means that it isn't going to happen in any single presidential administration.
	So it didn't happen in Trump's administration, and it won't happen this time if they pretend that we are in that treaty.
	And so Steve Malloy was saying, all we have to do is have one senator stand up and say, I want to vote on this treaty, and it won't pass.
	But of course, nobody would ever do that.
	And they wouldn't even do it then, and we were talking about that.
	He said, okay, everybody is rejoicing.
	Because in 2017, he said, hey, I'm going to get out of it, but it'll be right after the election of 2020.
	And so right after the election of 2020, they got out of it.
	And then within, what, 60 days?
	Biden puts us back in.
	That's what he did on his first day.
	He puts us back in.
	If we're going to pretend that presidents can put us into treaties, or if we're going to pretend that presidents can take us out of treaties like that, we're just going to keep in and out, in and out, in and out, right?
	And yet we were never in it in the first place.
	And so, 50,000 people have flown to oil-rich Baku, Azerbaijan.
	For the 29th Annual UN Climate Conference, where an aggressive push to limit carbon emissions is expected to dominate proceedings along with demands, and this is what they're, they use that language, demands for compensation to be paid by wealthy industrial nations to the world's poorest.
	Yeah, these are all government agendas to redistribute wealth.
	That's what this is really about.
	The doomers are out there.
	They've got two issues.
	Number one, they want to kill us all.
	Depopulation is the number one thing.
	But don't forget that even though we got people like Elon Musk pushing back against that aspect of it, at least publicly, the other part of this is a massive transfer of wealth from people in the U.S. and Europe to individuals like Elon Musk.
	That's how he got to be the world's richest man.
	By green rifting.
	One noted absentee will be climate activist Greta Thunberg, who says she'll not be attending COP29 because the event is greenwashing.
	It's all greenwashing, folks.
	All this Doomer nonsense is greenwashing.
	They have an ambitious desire not just to limit global emissions of pollutants, but also to arrange wealth transfers from rich industrialized countries to poor third world entities that it is claimed suffer.
	Due to their lack of development.
	I've always said that the environmentalist movement, from an economic standpoint, is a watermelon movement.
	It's got a thin veneer green, and on the inside it's all red.
	And I know red is now the color of the Republican Party and Trump, but no, red has always been the color of communism.
	It's Marxism.
	It's another way that they gaslight these people who don't know their left hand from their right hand.
	They don't know anything about history.
	They don't know anything about politics.
	That's why they followed Trump like a pied piper.
	I'm a red state.
	Look, we're red state this and red state that.
	A trillion dollars in annual climate finance for developing countries, replacing a target of $100 billion, though they just upped it by a factor of 10.
	From $100 billion to a trillion.
	No problem.
	Tasneem Esop, Executive Director of Climate Action Network, said climate reparations, he's demanding them, he said, we know the debt is much larger, but five trillion is what we come here to demand, he said.
	Oh, you owe us a lot more than that, but you know what, we're really nice guys.
	We'll settle for five trillion dollars.
	The argument is that rich nations have allegedly prospered by burning fossil fuels while the poor nations sit around contemplating their navels.
	I remember this conversation.
	I've had this conversation since I was in high school because all of this Earth Day garbage began when I was in high school and my first year of high school.
	And it was bunk then.
	And when I would push back against it, this is absolute nonsense.
	And really the key thing, you know, then they were saying we're going to have a, it wasn't going to be global warming, it was going to be a global ice age.
	And I said, all right, I could use some cooler weather here in Florida.
	That's fine.
	I'm fine with that.
	And then they flipped the script after about eight years or whatever.
	But they would also say, look at this.
	We're using most of the world's energy because those days what they were talking about was not CO2 and not global warming again, right?
	It was energy usage.
	And that all intensified towards the end of the 70s when the OPEC oil embargo was there.
	They said, look at this, we're using most of the world's energy.
	And I said, yeah, and we're making most of the world's goods.
	And so now what they've done is they're transferring the energy consumption from the U.S. to China.
	And if you go back and you look at energy consumption for the last 200 years, you can see that most of it was in Britain during the early days of the Industrial Revolution because they were making most of the stuff.
	And then as power transferred, economic and military power transferred from Britain to the United States, you could see that the United States became the major consumer of energy.
	And now that they have prohibited us doing it and allowed China, in the name of global warming, China can build as many and as dirty a power plant as they wish, and it's not a problem.
	Same thing with India.
	And so now they're transferring the manufacturing to them.
	And, of course, they are now the big emitters, but nobody cares about China or about India.
	It's just that we have to pay.
	And we're going to pay in a lot of different ways.
	You see, this group, this mob, wants us to just hand them a check for like $5 trillion.
	But then you've got the corporate grifters who want to have this as an excuse.
	To profit off of every single transaction and have us pay to them carbon taxes.
	Look, Elon Musk in this regard is not really any different from Bill Gates or from Al Gore.
	They all wanted us to pay them an indulgence in order to use energy.
	And it's like, why should I have to pay you every time I do something?
	But that's what they focused on.
	And it looks like it's starting to come together in the Trump administration.
	We'll talk about that.
	But again, in this article, Trump has pledged to once again withdraw the U.N. from the landmark Paris Climate Agreement.
	As I said, it was a head fake.
	We were never in it.
	He said in 2017, we'll get out of it, but we gotta wait until 2020 to get out of it.
	And then after the election, he gets out of it.
	60 days, Biden puts us back in.
	Were we out of it at all?
	No.
	It was just a head fake.
	And yet, I see this everywhere.
	Everywhere.
	I had three articles talking about Trump and climate today.
	Every one of them said that Trump got us out of the climate accord.
	No, he didn't.
	I've said it over and over again.
	I even played, you know, when this was all happening in 2017, the big debate.
	And then when he said, all right, we'll get out of it in 2020, I played the clip from Casablanca, you know, the White House.
	Humphrey Bogart saying, we'll always have Paris, sweetie.
	You know, right?
	So, yeah, sweetheart, we've always got Paris.
	We'll always have it.
	We'll never get out of it.
	They kept us in it.
	And yet you've got people who are looking at this even with a critical eye.
	And otherwise good researchers who just go for it.
	Yeah, Trump got us out.
	So, we look at Zeldin, who is coming in.
	Lee Zeldin, who has been put in as EPA head.
	And it's like, who is this guy?
	And as I started to look him up, I saw some very, very troubling stuff.
	This guy, back in 2019, was part of a congressional group to push subsidies for carbon capture.
	Yes, that's right.
	Even before Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, there was showering green subsidies on everybody for all of the imagined stuff.
	You know, whether it's the charging stations, you know, $8 billion charging stations.
	And they made seven of them in several years.
	You know, or the windmills or whatever.
	But the carbon capture is one of the worst ones.
	And we talked about this in the run-up to it.
	We had Doug Burgum, who was being entertained at Mar-a-Lago.
	Doug Burgum, who is governor of North Dakota, And the South Dakota governor, Kristi Noem, also a Republican.
	They both went to Mar-a-Lago.
	And then there was the CEO of a company that's running a major pipeline.
	I can't remember the name of it.
	But we talked about it at the time.
	And said, look at these three, what they're doing.
	He's running this big pipeline.
	Supposedly, people are going to capture carbon at power plants or wherever, manufacturing processes.
	They're going to capture the CO2. Which we need.
	CO2 is good.
	We want more of it.
	But they're going to grab it and they're going to put it in a pipeline and they're going to send it across the North American continent to South Dakota and North Dakota.
	At great expense, by the way.
	And at great ecological damage.
	And at great destruction to private property.
	They're going to pump this CO2 across the country And then pump it into the ground in North Dakota and South Dakota.
	And so you've got the guy who's running the pipeline, the company, is there at Mar-a-Lago, along with Doug Burgum and Kristi Noem, two Republicans who are part of this scam.
	And they were there at Mar-a-Lago.
	So we said, well, we know what's going to happen with it.
	Now, another piece of the puzzle has come in.
	We have Lee Zeldin, who had introduced carbon capture legislation as a congressman.
	He was a co-sponsor of the legislation to shower cash on people for this carbon capture insanity.
	And if this isn't idiocracy, folks, this is the most insane thing I have seen yet.
	The idea that we are going to, at great expense and great inefficiency, To the coal and the gas plants that are operating.
	We're going to capture that carbon, pump it across the continent, and pump it into the ground.
	What an absurd, idiotic idea.
	People will buy anything, evidently.
	And you've got people like Lee Zeldin, again, the co-sponsor, a Republican, who co-sponsored this carbon capture stuff.
	The carbon capture stuff, Republican Governor, Republican Governor, Republican Congressman, and now Lee Zeldin is the Republican EPA head.
	And guess what's going to happen?
	Pretty darn predictable, isn't it?
	That's his only experience that I could see that he has with anything environmental.
	Now, Trump's first EPA director in 2017 was Scott Pruitt.
	As Attorney General in Oklahoma, he had fought in opposition to the EPA. Lee Zeldin is not that way.
	Lee Zeldin has pushed this grift, this greenwashing grift of absurdity, this carbon capture scheme.
	He's a lawyer.
	Do you think he could figure out that we never were in the Paris Treaty?
	Paris Climate Treaty?
	I don't know, but he is going to push for this stuff, I think.
	Now, one of the aspects of this is the windmill stuff.
	Now, Trump has come out against windmills.
	Okay, fine.
	That's one aspect that's there.
	It's good to get rid of that, and it'll be a visible thing.
	And you've got a lot of Republican lawmakers, a lot of people who live against especially the offshore windmills.
	I mean, they're even worse when you put them on shore.
	But Trump had talked about that.
	He joked about it on Rogan.
	He said, I'm going to become a whale psychologist.
	These windmills actually drive them nuts.
	Yeah, you know, it's a very low-frequency thing that they can sense.
	It also drives the fishermen nuts because it is messing with what they're doing.
	So it's going to end on day one.
	GOP lawmakers and fishermen urge Trump to keep promises to axe the offshore wind.
	Ending federal support for offshore wind on its first day in office.
	Republican lawmakers opposed to heavily subsidized green energy and commercial fishermen who view the industry as an existential threat to their livelihoods are calling on President-elect Trump to follow through on his campaign's promises, which would imply ending federal subsidies and lease sales for the industry.
	Again, why doesn't the impotent Congress do something about this?
	Where do the subsidies come from?
	All spending begins with Congress.
	But as I pointed out, Mike Johnson is no different than Mike Boehner or Nancy Pelosi.
	He's the omnibus bill king.
	We're going to put everything in one bill and we're going to wait until after the deadline and then tell you that you've got like two days to look at this.
	Thousands of pages of stuff and it's all or nothing.
	And that's how they ram this stuff through.
	And Kevin McCarthy wasn't much better, but they pushed some restrictions on him to take some of this out of the hands of just the Speaker.
	You know, Pelosi and Boehner and Mike Johnson running this like a, it's just a tightly held scam.
	And McCarthy didn't want to change that, but he had to change that.
	We're going to make sure that the offshore wind ends on day one.
	And I'm going to write it out in an executive order.
	In an executive order?
	I mean, the way this ought to stop is with Congress stopping the money.
	Is this the new line item veto?
	An executive order?
	Can he do that?
	Well, we'll see exactly what he has in mind.
	I'm not really sure what he's talking about.
	Of course, you know, we did have a line item veto.
	That was part of Newt Gingrich and the Republicans' contract with America in 1994.
	And of course, they didn't talk about term limits or anything with that.
	They forgot about that plank.
	But they had 10 items, their contract with America.
	When I ran in 1996, I said, here's my contract with America, the 10 Bill of Rights.
	But theirs was all over the place.
	One of them was a line item veto.
	And that was good.
	And Newt Gingrich got that passed.
	Bill Clinton was all for it, got it signed and everything.
	You know who stopped it?
	Trump's pal, Rudy Giuliani, who was mayor of New York.
	No, no, no, no.
	I want all of that money sent here.
	I don't want that being cut out.
	So, I don't know, is the executive order a line item veto?
	Since January 2021, the Biden-Harris administration has approved 10 offshore wind projects at commercial scale.
	And conducted six offshore wind leases, including one held just last week in the Gulf of Maine that was criticized by the commercial fishing industry as part of Biden's wider climate agenda.
	Republican Representative Jeff Van Drew said, I have no doubt that a second Trump administration will do the right thing for Americans by scrapping the Biden-Harris offshore wind agenda.
	These projects are a burden on our economy.
	They harm local communities and are nothing but a political payoff to special interests.
	Trump understands that true energy independence and prosperity comes from American oil, gas, solar, and especially nuclear.
	I guess we've got to get solar in there for Elon Musk because he's going to make a lot of money off of these battery energy storage sites that are the biggest fire hazard anyone has ever created.
	There's massive battery storage sites that are supposed to back up the solar panel and the wind energy, you know, the renewable stuff.
	And if you've got a battery that's big enough to back up your grid, think about how big that fire's going to be.
	And he's already had some fires at some of them.
	So, Republican Maryland Representative Andy Harris, who was chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, said, We are wasting money.
	And the worst part is that all that money is going to foreign wind companies, because there are no American wind companies.
	They're all foreign companies.
	And they're making billions of dollars off the American energy rate payer.
	These are the people who are not taxpayers, rate payers.
	They're also making money off of the taxpayer, of course, because they're getting subsidies.
	They're getting taxpayer subsidies.
	But the people who have to pay for the energy, that never ends.
	And I talked about the two big projects off the coast of Long Island.
	Both of those are owned by European oil companies.
	And as I pointed out, the entire cost, wholesale cost, was something, 30-something dollars per megawatt hour, wholesale.
	But their profits alone are going to be 50-something dollars, megawatt hours, like $54 per megawatt hour.
	How do you go from a total cost of $30 to a profit of over $50?
	What about some of the most monumental corruption?
	I just can't wrap my head around it.
	So imagine what the entire cost is going to be to people if their profit is going to be nearly twice what the entire cost is right now to the ratepayers.
	It's going to go up five or six times.
	And just think about that.
	If you've got a $150 a month electric bill, Do you want to pay $750 a month for electricity?
	$1,000 a month for electricity?
	Why?
	So these doomers can joust with windmills like Don Coyote?
	It's incredibly stupid!
	How stupid are we that we go for this kind of stuff?
	Well, at least this incendi looks like it's going to be shut down.
	The Republicans are not invested in the wind stuff.
	That's coming from foreign countries, so it's safe to get rid of that.
	Not so with the other stuff.
	Not so much so with the things that Elon Musk and Lutnik are involved in.
	A Spanish utility earned Republican lawmakers ire in July when debris from one of the project's turbine blades, which is longer than the Statue of Liberty is tall, washed up on Massachusetts beaches after breaking apart and falling into the ocean.
	Harris Wrote on X, we should never allow foreign-owned companies to control our energy supply, much less harm our environment while doing it.
	That is not Lala Harris.
	That is Andy Harris, the Republican congressman.
	The New England Fishermen's Stewardship Association organized a flotilla protest at the site of the broken wind turbine in August.
	And they are calling on the Trump administration to walk back Biden's goal of deploying 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030.
	The group is also advocating for the incoming Trump administration to, quote, delist, unleashed wind energy areas off the coast of New England and the Mid-Atlantic.
	The incoming administration has a historic opportunity to save American workers from foreign developers, to reinvigorate iconic coastal towns, and to improve America's food security.
	To allow us to fish, you know.
	I would expect the prospect of offshore wind to dim once the subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act are repealed.
	Again, repealed?
	Is that going to be an executive order veto?
	Is that going to be a vote in Congress by Mike Johnson?
	How did that get through, Mike?
	How did all this stuff get through?
	And how come you keep funding all this stuff?
	The left, right, bipartisan, professional wrestling stuff is just, I can't stand it anymore.
	I have no patience for this stuff.
	I am sick and tired of being lied to by the Republican Trump-sucking media that is out there telling me that he's going to fix everything.
	When in reality, they're not doing anything.
	It's all a sham.
	It's all a sham.
	They never stop giving them the money.
	They never stop the money for the IRS and its 80,000 agents.
	State and federal subsidies can mask the cost by shifting it to the tax base.
	But ultimately, either ratepayers or taxpayers will bear the significantly above market cost of offshore wind.
	And, of course, both of them will.
	Now, we're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, we're going to talk about some excellent research that was done by Whitney Webb at Unlimited Hangout.
	She ties together all of these people that are part of this transition team, Musk and Lutnik and Zeldin, tying them all together.
	And the carbon market stuff.
	She doesn't mention the big project that is in North and South Dakota and the connections with that company and these Republican governors.
	But it's really good.
	We're going to talk about that when we come back.
	We can take a break.
	Dialectic is, Hegelian says, if Trump pushes too hard, the people will wake up.
	And after that trust is broken, we will be in a place to expand liberty.
	Yeah, that's why I say that the Democrats, I think, are a slightly less dangerous evil, because Trump puts people to sleep.
	In the same way when you look at the Second Amendment, right?
	You get a Republican president, people stop buying guns.
	Oh, we're good.
	Second Amendment is now safe.
	And then you've got Trump who says, well, we'll take the gun and do the due process later.
	I can ban whatever I want.
	Fortunately, I've got the power to do that.
	And he sets a precedent for gun control by executive order.
	But you can see that when a Democrat comes in, Boom!
	You know, gun orders go way up.
	And as Lala Harris was being touted by the mainstream media as being ahead in the polls, gun sales went way up.
	And then when the Republican gets in, they go way down.
	He puts people to sleep.
	The Republicans always, not just him, but all Republicans will do that.
	12 June 1776.
	No evidence of the people waking up.
	We already had Trump murder Americans with Operation Warp Speed.
	Exactly right.
	All homicidal grifting traitors.
	That's what's been known for over 75 years.
	I agree.
	Octo Spook.
	Massive transfer of wealth is nothing more than the theft of money, wealth, property, morals, ethics, time-honored values from the middle class and the poor.
	I absolutely agree.
	Droff.
	So the climate on this planet is controlled by the sun.
	Yes, I talked.
	I'll never forget when I talked about that.
	I had all these people attacking me.
	You're an idiot to say that the climate is affected driven by the sun.
	It's like, I'm the idiot?
	Why do we even have seasons?
	It's because of this relatively minor change and distance that we have to the sun or whatever.
	And of course, the sun is changing its activity all the time.
	Anyway, back to a drop.
	The climate on this planet is controlled by the sun.
	And the cycle we're in is the 45 to 50 year one.
	The solar maximum being next year.
	No, it's your SUV. That's what it is.
	It's your SUV. That's what the Doomers will tell you.
	And when they tell you that, just say, okay, Doomer.
	Atomic Dog.
	My friend's dad worked for a solar panel manufacturer.
	They started when Obama did his Green Deal and they went out of business once the free government money dried up.
	All of this stuff.
	Just exactly like that.
	And again, it's made Elon Musk the richest man in the world.
	Made him the richest man in the world.
	And he's obviously not worried about climate when he's lighting up these massive rockets all the time, is he?
	Lieutenant Oracle of Truth, USA never had a problem breaking treaties.
	Just ask the American Indians and Russians.
	That's exactly what I mentioned yesterday.
	We break treaties all the time.
	We broke the SALT treaty, but we broke it.
	Russell Means wrote a book, and he almost got the nomination of the Libertarian Party to run for president.
	That was the year that Ron Paul ran, and it was a close race between the two of them.
	And he wrote a book.
	He was a leader in the American Indian movement, and he said, no, we're not going to call ourselves Native Americans.
	We're Indians.
	And he said the same thing I've always said.
	He said, you've got Europeans whose families have been here now for four centuries.
	They're Native Americans.
	We're Indians.
	But he wrote this book.
	It's called, Where White Men Fear to Tread.
	And you open it up, it's the Constitution and everything.
	He says, white man, the Constitution is your government's treaty with you.
	As Indians, we have seen them make and break every treaty that they've made with us.
	And they are breaking the Constitution treaty that they have with you.
	What are you going to do about it?
	That's always a question, isn't it?
	What are we going to do about it?
	Johnny Freedom says, the offshore windmills make noise like a jackhammer.
	The whales and the porpoises can't take it.
	And they beached themselves.
	Nothing in the media.
	I can imagine.
	I've fortunately never been close to any of them.
	I know the people, when they put them onshore, even though they put them at a distance, People get nauseous from the pressure.
	It's not even just the sound.
	They feel the pressure of this stuff.
	And of course, you know, murders bats especially, but birds as well.
	And with the bats, the bats are not colliding with these propellers.
	What kills the bats is the difference in air pressure.
	And so, you know, they're breathing deeply and breathing rapidly.
	And so they go into an area where the pressure is low, and they exit on the other side of the blade where the pressure is high.
	And it's the same air embolism that happens to a scuba diver.
	The first thing you learn when you take scuba diving lessons that I took was, you know, you go down.
	You'll never hold your breath while you're going up.
	If you take a breath down there with a tank that's pressurized and you've got a full lung and you're not exhaling as you ascend, your lungs will explode.
	And they've got nowhere else to go.
	The pressure is going to decrease.
	You have about every, was it every 30, 32 feet or something, you get another atmosphere of pressure.
	12 June, 1776.
	Carbon capture is big oil.
	80% of captured carbon is going to be used to frack oil.
	Well, the whole thing is just an amazing grift.
	The carbon capture, the carbon taxes is what we're going to talk about when we come back.
	And the Trump administration is knee-deep in this already.
	The people that are all lined up.
	And personnel is policy, folks.
	It really is.
	And so you should look at the backgrounds of these people.
	What have they done?
	What are their connections?
	Where are they making their money?
	And they know where the policy is going to be.
	Will Tubax says big windmills are crappy.
	30-inch Dubai fans on swivels on treetops.
	Cheap, effective power.
	H. Bergeron, 1984.
	Harrison Bergeron.
	There we go.
	Whales are the highest consumers of plankton that produce most of the oxygen in the world.
	So to save the planet, we must nuke the whales.
	And Max, RFK Jr., the anti-vax queen, suddenly only cares about Froot Loops.
	And there's a big discussion Karen said about that yesterday.
	Spelled F-R-O-O-T. I thought that was funny.
	I'd never noticed that because we have never bought them.
	I've never eaten them.
	I've seen them.
	I've seen how iridescent the colors are.
	I don't know what kind of insects are crushing up to get those kind of iridescent colors.
	But they then slather it, I guess, with...
	Tons and tons of sugar.
	And they can't call it F-R-U-I-T because there isn't any fruit in it, I guess.
	The anti-vax queen now suddenly only cares about Froot Loops.
	Vaxes.
	What are those?
	Yeah, what is that?
	Do you remember what that is now?
	Pretty soon you're going to have Trump saying, what is an RFK Jr.?
	I don't know.
	Who is this guy?
	I think he's going to ghost him.
	I think he's going to do the same thing he did to WikiLeaks.
	He loved WikiLeaks when WikiLeaks was helping him to win, and then after he got elected, it's like, who are they?
	I don't know who they are.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, Trump is coming back, and the crypto market is just ecstatic.
	I mean, we got Bitcoin hitting multiple all-time highs throughout the day.
	I got an alert from Cash App.
	Every time it changes by 5% going up or down, it sends me a thing.
	It was at $89,000 at one point.
	Because, you know, Trump is anti-CBDC. Did you know that?
	And Trump is pro-crypto.
	And Trump wants to do things like put Bitcoin into our reserve accounts and have the government buy it.
	Trump is going to save us from the green doomers.
	He's going to fix all that stuff.
	Well, the interesting thing is, is that, not really.
	Because all these things are coming together into a picture where we can see that all this talk about the crypto bros coming in here, they're going to make a lot of money off of the blockchain.
	They're going to make a lot of money off of tokenizing things.
	And they will use that to establish a CBDC by de facto.
	They'll have to surveil us.
	They will have, that'll be done at the local areas.
	They're already rolling out the model in Latin America.
	They're implementing it at the municipal level where they just have to buy some local officials and now they're going to start tracking your carbon stuff and you can pay somebody.
	I don't know who gets, who do we pay the indulgence to?
	Who do we pay for the sin of using energy?
	Who do we pay for the sin of eating something or traveling or buying clothing?
	These guys who are part of the Trump transition team.
	You see, everybody goes to sleep, just like with the gun stuff.
	We're good to go now because you're going to protect us against all these attacks on crypto and things.
	You can protect us from CBDC, and yet they're going to fold all this stuff together to do a de facto crypto.
	And they'll do it very subtly, as I've said so many times.
	Before somebody can stab you in the back, they have to get behind you.
	So Trump is behind us on all of these issues.
	And then we've got Lee Zeldin, Trump's new EPA head.
	All in on carbon capture.
	He sponsored in 2019 the Carbon Capture Improvement Act.
	And just like Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, it sent out massive subsidies for this doomer insanity.
	Except that Zeldin's was targeted toward one thing.
	And that's the carbon capture area.
	And all these people like Larry Fink and Lutnik that have made so much money in these markets of tokens and other things like that, that's what they want.
	We don't care what you do as long as you pay us a tax.
	You're free to choose.
	You want to have oil and gas?
	Because now everybody understands that solar and wind can't deliver, right?
	So you want oil and gas?
	That's fine.
	You can do that.
	You just pay us a carbon tax.
	You want meat and dairy?
	That's fine.
	Just pay us a carbon tax.
	That type of thing.
	We're all about choice.
	If the first week of the Trump administration is any guide, technocracy is set to gain more ground during the next four years than it did since the turn of the century, writes Technocracy News editor.
	The key players in this transition team are technocrats, and they will pick other technocrats to run the country.
	Shadow government technocrats already include Elon Musk and Peter Thiel.
	Indeed, this is the dawning of the age of, not Aquarius, but of techno-populism.
	And so, on Technocracy News, He's got an excellent article from Whitney Webb from Unlimited Hangout.
	And this is what Whitney says.
	He says, As I mentioned before, Doug Burgum, Kristi Noem, North Dakota, South Dakota, the CEO of a big pipeline, all of them meeting in Mar-a-Lago, talking about how they can make everything, all the gas and...
	Coal and oil plants a lot more inefficient and a lot more expensive by putting this carbon capture nonsense on it, putting it in a pipeline, shipping it across the continent, storing it in North and South Dakota.
	And these Republicans all make out like bandits, just like the green grifters and the greenwashing CEOs who put all this stuff through, who come up with this idiotic idea.
	But we're the idiots if we let them do this.
	While many Republicans for years have railed against the official narrative around climate change and many of the solutions promoted to mitigate it, climate finance, climate finance, It's poised to make a comeback over the next four years.
	Because many of the most influential names in the incoming Trump administration, as well as the previous one, have become intimately involved in creating carbon markets in recent years.
	While others have long-standing track record of pushing carbon taxes and other forms of carbon pricing.
	Chief among these is Howard Lutnik.
	The co-chair of Trump's transition team, who is tasked with finding the quote-unquote talent for the incoming administration.
	And by the way, let me just play for you again.
	This is, as we look at Trump turning around, well, I'm going to continue with this and I'll play it later.
	Just to remind you, I'm going to play it, there's a clip somebody put together.
	Of RFK Jr.
	talking about how he's going to get in to HHS. And then Lutnik, when he's pushed on it by Caitlin at MSNBC, he says, no, no, no, he's not going to be head of HHS. And that was Lutnik.
	That was the first time I saw him.
	And so they were talking about vaccines, and she got very, very upset when he just started talking about vaccine safety.
	No, no, no.
	We have science.
	We have science and we have sponsors.
	You know, she didn't say that.
	But anyway, who is Lutnik?
	Lutnik is a longtime and current head of a company called Cantor Fitzgerald, which was one of the earliest players in emission trading and has since become a global leader in ESG investing.
	Oh, you thought you were done with ESG? It's back.
	They're back.
	Sustainable infrastructure financing and green bonds.
	That's what this Lutnik guy, who is a co-chair of Trump's transition team, that's where he's coming from.
	He's the ESG king.
	And then you've got Elon Musk, who's the king of crony capitalism around green stuff.
	What do you think is going to happen in the Trump administration?
	Well, let's just take a look at the Contours of his background here.
	Cantor's Sustainable Infrastructure Fund is expressly committed to, quote, digital transformation, decarbonization, and the improvement and modernization of aging infrastructure, unquote.
	It says, another quote, a primary focus for the fund will be to invest in issuers that are helping to address certain UN sustainable development goals.
	This is the 2030 stuff, folks.
	It's all there.
	And everybody is rejoicing and popping champagne corks.
	It's great.
	We're away from all this green nonsense, the Biden administration.
	And he takes one of the people who makes his living from this stuff.
	He makes his living from pushing ESG. He makes his living from pushing the UN Sustainable Development Goals and 2030 stuff.
	And he puts him in as a co-chair of his transition team.
	So, another top constituent of Cantor Infrastructure Fund is something called InvenEnergy.
	It's like inventing energy, okay?
	A renewable energy company that has received a significant amount of subsidies from Biden's Controversial Inflation Reduction Act and is run by the country's first wind billionaire, Michael Polsky.
	So, again, the wind stuff is back there.
	You know, we've got a lot of windy politicians, don't we?
	A lot of windbags, a lot of blowhard politicians.
	Ha!
	Just put them on these windmills and we'll be fine.
	Okay, Doomer, this is the greenwashing of the Trump transition team.
	It's just kind of an example, as I've talked about so many times.
	The evil that is brought to us by the Democrats is ham-fisted.
	It's straight ahead.
	We know who these evil people are, but with the GOP, like Satan, they are the most cunning beasts of the field.
	Very subtle.
	Very sneaky.
	Very backstabbing.
	The GOP devises these kinds of hidden schemes while pretending that they're on your side.
	So you want Bitcoin and blockchain?
	We got it.
	You want to stop the windmills?
	You got it.
	And you can do anything that you want.
	And we're going to have a free market and all of this stuff.
	And then you'll pay us and our friends.
	And we will use the blockchain To track everything that you do.
	And then guess what?
	When the Democrats get in, the Democrats will say, okay, well, we got all this information about what you're doing and what you're eating and all the rest of what you're driving if you still have a car.
	And now we're going to prohibit it.
	You see how it works?
	Trump creates the vaccine and Biden weaponizes it against us.
	They're creating the carbon capture market and infrastructure and carbon taxes.
	And then the next Democrat will weaponize them against us.
	And MAGA will never catch on.
	You can beat them right in the face and they'll never figure it out.
	Lutnick also serves on the board of a satellite surveillance company called Satellogic.
	In addition to Lutnick, this is Whitney Webb's research.
	In addition to Lutnick, former Trump Secretary Steve Mnuchin The Treasury Secretary chairs its board.
	And also on the board is Joe Dunford, the former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Trump.
	So SaddleLogic is an integral part of the consortium that is attempting to use opaque contractual agreements at the municipal level to impose a massive blockchain-based carbon market on Latin America.
	You see that?
	So, surveillance with the satellites.
	Set up contracts that the public doesn't see that are with the people who are running the cities, the municipal government.
	And let's try it in Latin America, where it would be a lot easier to pull it off.
	That's what these people are doing already.
	They're their beta test site for this stuff.
	The carbon market operating under the name Green Plus.
	Yeah, it's like Disney Plus.
	You know, all these bad plus on it.
	Double plus good, isn't it?
	You know, Cornette Orwellian.
	It operates under the name Green Plus.
	This is a carbon market.
	It's poised to be built on top of a Bitcoin side chain.
	There you go.
	Bitcoin, blockchain.
	We've got all this stuff there, and everybody's rejoicing and buying into it.
	And they're going to use that for their carbon market.
	And they're going to use it as a de facto CBDC. But rather than being imposed, I just talked about a couple weeks ago how they said, well, you know, the 5I countries, that's the 5Is of the intelligence agencies of...
	The U.S., U.K., Canada, New Zealand, Australia.
	Five English-speaking people, right?
	Former British colonies.
	And the spies and all these different groups cooperate with each other.
	It's one big club, and you ain't in it.
	They're watching you.
	This is the club that watches you.
	And they watched you, and they understand that you understand about CBDC. And so it's not going to be a frontal attack.
	And I said that.
	I said, don't think that CBDC is going away.
	Biden was out there flying his flag in March of 2022.
	He said, in six months, I want to report from every part of the swamp, and everybody's going to come in and give me a report about CBDC and how we can implement it.
	And here's the four different areas.
	How are we going to completely redesign the financial system?
	How are we going to write the code?
	How is law enforcement going to force people to do it?
	And then how are we going to come up with a justification for it?
	Ah, we'll say that it saves energy compared to crypto.
	And we're going to go to war with crypto because it just uses too much energy.
	Then, boom, AI happens.
	And now it's like, oh, well, we want AI because that's going to help us to surveil people and to propagandize people and to censor people.
	So we've got to have AI, and it requires a lot of power.
	Okay, and so now we've got Trump in there, and these people are going to say, look, we're just going to have a free market and energy, and you can use whatever you want as long as you pay us and pay our corporate sponsors.
	It's a public-private partnership.
	They're outsourcing the tyranny again.
	The only money communities could make from this scheme would only be available for Green Plus approved sustainable projects, while Green Plus members would reap the bulk of the profits.
	The program would also subject communities to Satellogic's satellite surveillance apparatus, which is also tied to the US government and Israeli intelligence, and it would do so without their consent.
	Because that's always a key part of CBDC. So if you're going to outsource the CBDC tyranny, you've got to have some surveillance aspect to it as well.
	Green Plus is notably tied to figures who are close to Trump's allies in the region.
	And she gets into those connections as well, including people like Javier Malay in Argentina.
	A major investor in Satellogic.
	The dollar stablecoin issuer Tether is also closely connected to Howard Lutnik, the co-chair of the Trump transition team.
	Lutnik is a long-time major advocate of Tether, and his company, Cantor Fitzgerald, custodies the bulk of Tether's U.S. treasuries that back up their stablecoin, and it's peg to the U.S. dollar.
	You see...
	Musk, as I said before, he's not altruistic.
	He had very big political goals in terms of buying Twitter.
	And he wants to turn Twitter into a kind of global bank, a kind of payment exchange thing, like a global version of PayPal.
	Essentially, if done right, the X would serve people's financial needs to such a degree that over time it would Become, I don't know, maybe half of the global financial system.
	Wow.
	Or some big number.
	I'm not sure what the number is, but pretty big.
	So it would be by far the biggest sort of financial institution.
	But like I said, not really in the way that people are used to thinking about banks.
	Just the most efficient Database for the thing that is money.
	I said, like, least amount of fraud.
	Everything's real time.
	And if it involves money in any way, it can be dealt with seamlessly on one location.
	One location.
	We can do it seamlessly.
	We can do it quick.
	We can do it electronically, right?
	That's what he's looking for.
	He's looking for that.
	He's got a lot of different uses.
	Twitter, it's like a Swiss Army knife for this guy.
	First of all, it gets them a lot of clout in Washington, especially with the Republican side.
	He is now the biggest winner out of this election.
	Tremendous amount of clout.
	He's worshipped by the base for quote-unquote saving free speech.
	But it also allows him to have access to what everybody is thinking.
	To have his finger on the pulse of public opinion like nobody else in the world really.
	And so he knows exactly what MAGA is thinking as well as the general public.
	And he can control debate as well.
	And then he can use this to feed into this discussion, and things that are on there can be used to feed artificial intelligence.
	And then finally, he can use it as a global financial system, which is ultimately where he wants to go.
	You know, this poor guy, I mean, look at all the money that he invested just to save our free speech and just to help the people at Babylon be.
	What naive people out there.
	In addition to Lutnik, prominent Trump backer and donor Elon Musk, this is Whitney Webb writing, who has pledged to work with Lutnik to usher in an unprecedented age of government efficiency.
	He has invested heavily in carbon removal technology, even created a $100 million prize to spur new carbon removal methods.
	Elon Musk, right there on the carbon sequestration stuff.
	Removal and sequester this.
	Even put out a prize, $100 million.
	So how is he going to get that back?
	Oh, he's going to get it back in multiples.
	Musk also previously broke ties with Trump during his previous administration after Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Agreement in 2017.
	Again, he didn't pull out.
	And it's amazing.
	As good as Whitney Webb is, and I love her stuff.
	She does great work.
	This is an excellent piece.
	Deep relationships in it.
	That's a fundamental mistake that's being made by everybody, as I said.
	Just putting together this stuff here and these articles, three articles, every single one of them says that Trump got us out of the Paris Climate Accord.
	He never did!
	I won't go into all that again, but it is a key issue because it is deceptive.
	And if you don't see that deception that is at the core, if you don't understand that we have to be put into a treaty by Senate ratification, Anyway, that's so fundamental.
	Anyway, she says, Musk previously lobbied the Biden administration on implementing a carbon tax, a policy supported by Janet Yellen, Federal Reserve, Biden's Treasury Secretary.
	So we've got Biden's Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, is on board with all this stuff.
	Steve Mnuchin, Trump's Treasury Secretary.
	Wait a minute.
	It's almost like there's a revolving door between the Democrats and Republicans.
	It's just a distinction without a difference, folks.
	Come on.
	They're outsourcing the tyranny.
	They're going to run through CBDC as a public-private partnership carbon tax.
	And it's all going to be a sidechain on Bitcoin.
	It's going to be a blockchain thing.
	It's going to be tokenized.
	But it'll still be a de facto CBDC. Surreptitiously put in, and surreptitiously put in, folks, at the local level.
	They think globally, they have global schemes, but they have to implement it at the local level.
	And you can pretty much forget about anything at the state and federal level now.
	Now, those people have completely sold their soul to these Satanist globalists, but at the local level, It's a hitter, you know, some good stuff and some bad stuff.
	I've got a report about another local level pushing back against the vaccines, this one in Australia.
	We can push back against some of this stuff, but it's going to have to be local.
	And this stuff is ultimately going to be implemented locally.
	If we get together, we can stop it.
	We can nullify it at the local level.
	We can even nullify it at the state level.
	That's why I talk about what's going on with the marijuana issues, medical marijuana, even recreational marijuana.
	That shows that we can nullify anything that we don't like, just as we've seen things like that done with the gun control stuff.
	We've seen nullification of federal unconstitutional laws.
	You don't have to sue and appeal to the Supreme Court.
	You can nullify that.
	At the state level, you can say, we're not going to, that's not going to happen here.
	But you've got to have the people who understand what is happening.
	So Whitney Webb says, under the Trump administration, the push for a carbon tax was led by Republicans.
	The Trump-era proposal was known as the Baker-Schultz plan.
	To repeal emissions regulations from the EPA and a rollback of some Obama-era climate policies in exchange for replacing them with a carbon tax.
	The plan was framed as a way to, quote, let the market decide, unquote.
	How to price carbon as opposed to governmental prohibitions.
	See, that's the difference.
	The Democrats will come in with a ham-fisted prohibition, or they'll come in with a ham-fisted vaccine mandate.
	The Republicans will say, well, let the people decide.
	This is the best vaccine.
	It's going to save everybody's lives.
	It's a moonshot, and we'll get the Christian pastors out there to sell it to you.
	You know, we'll have DeWine, the Republican governor, first one to offer a vaccine lottery.
	You could win a million dollars, or you could die, you know.
	Or you could be crippled for the rest of your life.
	But hey, you could win a million dollars.
	That's why I say, the Republicans...
	Same agenda.
	It's just sold to us.
	Either it's the punch in the face, or they sneak around and they lift your wallet and stab you in the back.
	That's a Republican approach.
	The Baker-Schultz plan, named for James Baker and George Schultz, two Republicans who served in the Reagan and Bush senior administrations, notable as it was during Bush senior administration that emissions trading was first created with government support.
	The father of emissions trading, first for sulfur dioxide and then again for carbon, is Richard Sander, a former executive at the scandal-ridden, corrupt Drexel Burnham Lambert.
	Drexel's most notorious criminal, Michael Milken, was pardoned by Trump during his previous term.
	Oh, it is a club, isn't it?
	I mean, it's just like a little...
	It's like all the Charles Dickens novels, where you find out that everybody's related to everybody else.
	We've got this secret connection to somebody else that's eventually revealed in the novel.
	So, there were also, Drexel was also a key figure in the scandals of 1980s, the savings and loan crisis, and all the rest of this stuff.
	That also had ties to Jim Baker and the Bush family, as well as the CIA, as well as organized crime.
	Well, you know, CIA and organized crime is redundant, isn't it?
	While Trump did pull the U.S. out of the Paris Agreement.
	She says it a second time.
	Stop it with that.
	We never got out of the Paris Agreement.
	We're out for 60 days.
	It was a head fake.
	And it kept this whole thing going.
	Look, focus on this carbon stuff.
	That's the key thing.
	You know, Trump says, I'm going to get out of the Paris Agreement.
	He's not going to get us out.
	If he's pretending that we ever got in it, he's going to say, I can't do it for years.
	But that's my intention.
	Someday I'm going to get out of there.
	The outsized role of Lutnik and Musk, who cut ties with Trump last time over climate policy, is shaping his next administration policies and cabinet picks, suggesting that Trump has now softened his stance on market-based climate solutions.
	Trump is usually willing to give Wall Street whatever it wants.
	He gave Larry Fink, the veritable king of ESG, gave him nearly complete control of the U.S. fiscal policy during COVID, resulting in a massive wealth transfer.
	That's right!
	Big transfer.
	Not only did the PPP stuff, you know, the payroll protection plan, not the public-private partnership, but every time you see PPP, you know that somebody's going to be PPPing down your back and telling you that it's raining, to quote Josie Wales.
	But, yeah, that was a massive transfer of wealth.
	It was a massive transfer of wealth in many different ways.
	With PPP, it turns out that was supposed to be for small businesses, remember?
	Because small businesses were the ones that were told that they were not essential.
	Wall Street was essential.
	All the Wall Street corporations like Walmart, they were essential.
	They could stay open.
	But the mom and pops on Main Street, you were not essential.
	You had to close.
	But don't worry, we're going to give you some cash.
	We've set up a special program here, PPP, and that's just for the little guys.
	And the problem is that 5% of the recipients got over 50% of the money.
	And those 5% of the recipients were very big corporations.
	The big corporations got more than half of the money.
	And again, the little guys got nothing over and over again.
	By the time you look at the 50% that went to the big guys that weren't supposed to get it, And you look at the money that was channeled over to Planned Parenthood that wasn't supposed to get it.
	And then if you look at all of the scam and corruption of the people who obviously were not supposed to get it, well, that doesn't really leave too much for the little guys.
	That's why you had so many mom-and-pop businesses on Main Street go out of business under Donald Trump.
	Trump has surrounded himself with climate finance advocates.
	And the fact that Wall Street needs climate finance to unlock an entire new asset class is the sort of carbon pricing that we see in the works.
	Prominent figures in the Maha, Maha, Maha unity movement, right?
	Make America healthy again, RFK Jr., Nicole Shanahan.
	They have advocated for using tokenized carbon credits.
	Folks, that is outsourcing the CBDC tyranny.
	That is CBDC by any other name.
	It's a back door to CBDC. And again, they're going to set this thing up.
	They're going to set it up to rip us off, to surveil us after people get accustomed to it.
	Then the Democrats will come in and say, now you're going to be forced to use it.
	Right?
	Republicans will set up the whole structure and say, it's all voluntary.
	We're not forcing anybody to use anything.
	It's all voluntary.
	And we're making lots of money off of this stuff, but it's all voluntary.
	And then the Democrats come in and say, now you will use it.
	That's the tag team.
	It's the left, right, left, right march of tyranny.
	We've seen it before.
	And so we're pulling again with this carbon financial stuff.
	With the U.S. debt crisis in the cards, and with Howard Lutnick, one of the biggest traitors, they...
	Spell it T-R-A-D-E-R-S, but of course the other spelling applies as well.
	One of the biggest traitors of U.S. government debt in terms of choosing, he's now in charge of choosing Trump's next cabinet.
	The likelihood of carbon market has never been higher.
	Despite the recent Republican victory, the backdoor to CBDC. It's all this stuff.
	All these things I thought were good.
	I support Bitcoin.
	I support blockchain.
	I support cryptocurrencies.
	It's going to be used to enslave you.
	That's where the block and chain comes in, right?
	Block and tackle, block and chain.
	It's a form of slavery here, just like the net, the web that you've been caught in, right?
	It's a web, it's a net, it's a chain.
	All these different digital tyrannies that are coming there.
	And just to wrap it up here, the difference between the Republicans and Democrats.
	Lala Harris, hometown of Berkeley, California.
	And voters smacked it down.
	68% of voters smacked down a new tax.
	A new tax.
	They're going to put a tax on any commercial buildings.
	So this would be commercial buildings, restaurants, apartment complexes.
	If they used natural gas, they're going to put a new tax on them.
	And so this came up for a vote.
	Somebody pushed back against it.
	And they shut it down by nearly 70% in Lala Harris' town.
	And this is big, because they were the first ones to ban adding gas connections to new construction.
	And other cities in California thought that was such a great idea, they started copying it.
	But it was Berkeley that was first.
	And it was Lala Harris' hometown.
	And even there, when the Democrats come in in a ham-fisted way and say, we're going to charge you a tax for this, and it's going to save the planet, people don't want that.
	That's why you get the Republicans to come in and do it, get behind you, lift your wallet, and stab you in the back.
	A new and costly tax that would have chased away restaurants and small businesses, they said.
	Berkeley banned natural gas hookups in new construction back in 2019.
	A policy that liberal cities like LA and New York subsequently mimicked.
	The California Restaurant Association challenged this Berkeley ban in court.
	And a federal appellate court overturned the policy in April 2023.
	So they challenged it in court.
	The restaurants challenged it in court.
	You have all these restaurants saying, look, I have to cook with gas.
	The electric stuff just doesn't work right for what we're doing.
	And they had a big investment in it.
	And so they were able to stop that ham-fisted dictate saying you're not going to have any new construction that's going to have any gas connections.
	So then the ham-fisted Democrats come back and say, well, now we're going to impose a tax on you if you use it.
	And so that got put up for the voters.
	And the voters shut it down by 70%.
	But everybody is cheering, thinking we've got this thing solved with Trump, because they don't see it there.
	The natural climate variability is really what caused the so-called spike in temperatures in 2023.
	Supposedly 0.29 degrees C, a quarter of a degree centigrade.
	Folks, this is stupid.
	This is not science.
	When I began in engineering, they had just, before I got there, just made the switch from slide rules to calculators.
	And we had programmable calculators and things that you could use.
	So we no longer had to use the slide rules and interpolate from tables and all that kind of drudgery.
	But they still had the giant slide rules up on the wall.
	And I remember early on, I had a professor, he said, you know, we always had, when we did slide rules and interpolation out of tables, we would have three significant digits.
	You know, so you'd have a three-digit number, and then you would multiply it by some factor of 10, you know, to show what it was.
	And he says...
	Don't give me an answer that you write down 5 or 6 or 10 decimal points after it.
	He goes, that's utter stupidity.
	If you're that stupid, I'm going to give you an F. There's no way that you can measure anything that accurately.
	So even three digits that we use for the slide rule stuff, even that is a stretch, right?
	When you're starting to measure something, you don't have that kind of accuracy.
	And yeah, you can plug in a couple of numbers, and you can multiply it by cosine, or you're going to get some, you know, long digital number.
	That isn't...
	That isn't significant, you know?
	And if you think it is, you deserve to fail.
	You shouldn't be in engineering.
	Well, these people should not be in science of any sort.
	If they really think, and listen to this, this was, according to this study, and it was funded by NOAA, not of the ARC, but the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, that NOAA. And they funded this research.
	And so they looked at this and said, well, it's La Nina that occurs every few years, typically in a three to seven year period, and it messes with temperatures.
	And so we have that kind of temperature.
	And of course, that kind of stuff is also fueled by the sun.
	But according to the study...
	It is not external factors such as emissions from human activity that caused a 0.29 centigrade spike.
	Give or take 0.04 degrees centigrade.
	The guy who founded the Weather Channel, I can't remember his name, he was a big doomer skeptic.
	And he said, we were taking these, he says, compared to what?
	Again, you know, we go back and we talk about the three ways that you shut down any of these leftist agendas.
	You know, compared to what?
	And how do you prove that?
	You got any proof of that?
	And he said, we used to take these temperatures off of mercury glass thermometers.
	There's no way you're going to read something that is 0.29 degrees different, plus or minus 0.04 degrees.
	That's ridiculous.
	It's down in the round-off here.
	And it even got even worse than that, because not only is this a product...
	Of going from the analog mercury thermometers or the parallax view issues and all the rest of this stuff, but it's also where you put the thermometer.
	And even if you leave the thermometer in the same place, is the area that used to be in a rural area under shade, is it now on an airport tarmac, even if it's in the same GPS coordinates?
	Most of these things are now in urban heat islands, and that's the biggest distortion of the climate record that they have.
	These are the people who believe that the earth is billions of years old.
	I don't.
	They believe the earth is billions of years old, and they've got less than 100 years worth of data, and that's not even accurately determined anyway, or extensive in terms of the places where they were recording it.
	We just need to say to these people, okay, Doomer.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we'll take a look at some of your comments.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, NMAX says they want us all broke, and they want to be rich owning everything.
	Such are their slave, and Trump will pull it off of them.
	Scam 2.0.
	Think a likely appointee said the climate crisis will be his focus.
	Mm-hmm.
	It gives them everything they want.
	Their money, plus the depopulation agenda, plus the ability and the requirement to surveil everything that we do.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio, good to see you there.
	It says, RFK and Tulsi use their influence on their base to help to sell Trump.
	Neither one of them will be in the Trump administration.
	People really need to stop trusting all of these politicians.
	Oh, absolutely, I agree.
	As a matter of fact, This clip that I mentioned before about RFK Jr.
	and the broken promise, it switches back and forth between RFK Jr.
	talking about what he's been promised, and then this Lutnik guy who's co-chair of the transition team talking about how he ain't going to get what he was promised.
	The key that I think that President Trump has promised me is control of the public health agencies, which are HHS and its sub-agencies, CDC, FDA, NIH, and a few others, and then also the USDA, which is, which, you know, is key to making America healthy.
	My inside source tonight is the current...
	Now, two days later... ...vance transition team and the CEO of the investment firm, Kenner Fitzgerald, Howard Lutnick, RFK Jr.
	He said that Trump has promised him control of the public health agencies, HHS, which would be also, you know, CDC, FDA, USDA, all of these agencies.
	Is that true?
	Has Trump promised him basically the HHS job?
	So I spent two and a half hours this week with Bobby Kennedy Jr.
	And it was the most extraordinary thing.
	And I said, so tell me, how's it going to go?
	And he said, why don't you just listen to me explain things?
	And what he explained was when he was born, we had three vaccines and autism was one in 10,000.
	Now a baby's born with 76 vaccines.
	So what happened now?
	Autism is one in 34.
	Vaccines don't cause autism, which is what RFK pushes, which is why people are concerned that he could get a job like HHS. He's not getting a job.
	People are concerned that he could get a job like HHS. The key that I think that President Trump has promised me is control of the public health agencies, which are HHS and its sub-agencies.
	He's not getting a job for HHS. What he's trying to do, here's what he wants to do.
	He said, I want data.
	I just want data.
	He wants the data so he can say, these things are unsafe.
	All I want is the data, and I'll take on the data and show that it's not safe, and that if you pull the product liability, the companies will yank these vaccines right off You're saying he would not be in charge of HHS? No, of course not.
	The key that I think that President Trump promised me is control of the public health agencies, which are HHS and its sub-agencies.
	You're saying he would not be in charge of HHS? No, of course not.
	Okay, so he's not going to be an acting...
	He's not going to be the secretary, no!
	That's not what he was promised.
	Yeah, you get the idea, right?
	No, no, no, no.
	Well, what can I say?
	I told everybody it's going to use, it's just using RFK Jr.
	And maybe they're using each other.
	Like I said, if RFK Jr.
	just gets the data, He can bring that into Children's Health Defense.
	It has doubled pretty much every year of its existence, and they've done some good work.
	They're not where I want them to be.
	I want them to go a lot further.
	They have a limited reach in terms of where they want to go, even, in terms of their goals.
	But they have done a good job.
	Of exposing a lot of things, even in spite of that.
	And if he gets data, maybe something good will come of it.
	But if he gets the data, it's going to make Children's Health Defense much, much bigger.
	Because they're going to be at the core of, they're going to be breaking a lot of news.
	And that's fine.
	I don't mind if they get bigger if they expose some of this stuff.
	And we'll look at it, and if we think that it's a limited hangout, we'll tell you that we think it's a limited hangout.
	Duke Newcomb.
	Thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	He said, we'd love it if you wrote a book about your experience with InfoWars and Alex.
	Though money's not an end in itself, the catharsis this might offer would be worth the trouble.
	We all enjoy your take on that narcissistic.
	That case is now no longer alternative, but has become a champ for Trump, or chump for Trump, I guess.
	Sickens me.
	His uncle and CIA handlers have him leading us off a cliff.
	That's right.
	And his...
	It's taking orders from Steve Pertinick, who was the errand boy for Henry Kissinger all the years that we went to Bilderberg to troll Kissinger.
	And here he's got that.
	Anyway.
	Actually, the book I want to write is about my experiences with God, not with the devil.
	So that's the one I want to focus on and move on.
	That's the key thing.
	And I only talk about it because I just want to warn people.
	Don't follow people who have tricked you.
	Don't follow people who have conned you.
	Don't follow people who led you like a Judas goat to January the 6th.
	That's what I would not budge on, and that's what I got fired on.
	So I wouldn't budge on the lockdown and vaccine opposition stuff either, but I didn't get fired for that.
	I got fired because Alex was making so much money off of the Stop the Steal stuff, and I told people it was a grift.
	But let's talk about the vaccines.
	Dr.
	Mike Yadin says the COVID vaccines were intentionally designed to injure, to kill, and to cause infertility.
	He's a former vice president of Pfizer.
	He is a professional research scientist with over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and biotech.
	And so he gave a speech in Austria.
	And this was a conference that was held in Vienna.
	The 9th of November, after the election.
	Hasn't gotten much attention.
	This is an article from Exposé News out of the UK. They noticed it.
	The group that he spoke to was called Imprüfer Resistance Conference.
	I don't know, but that word that I can't pronounce is a German word that means vaccine victim.
	So this conference in Vienna...
	Was the Vaccine Victim Resistance Conference.
	And what he did was he said, look, you know, he's had all this experience.
	He knows how these drugs are put together.
	He knows what's in the drugs.
	And he knows that they know.
	And that was the problem that I had with Alex and with Mike Adams.
	I knew that they knew about this flu scam that was run every year.
	We talked about it every year.
	The flu vaccine scam.
	I had to tell people, oh, look, this year is going to be really bad.
	How do you know?
	How do you know what's coming up?
	You don't know.
	There's no way that you could know.
	According to your paradigm, if there is such a thing as a virus, which I now have my doubts, I think that a virus is essentially an intellectual construct to try to explain a phenomenon that they don't fully understand, just like black holes are.
	And so, it's an intellectual construct that And again, we look at the work of the Baileys, Samantha and her husband, I forget what her husband's name is, and they wrote a book about that, but exposed what happened in the UK, the cold house, where they tried to figure out how the common cold was being transmitted, and they did it for 45 years.
	And they would do disgusting things, like have people sneeze on each other.
	They would do even more disgusting things, like take mucus from the sick person, put it in the other person's mouth or nose.
	Still couldn't transfer it.
	And so they finally just shut the thing down after 45 years.
	So I think the virus thing is an intellectual construct, like I said, to try to explain a phenomenon that they don't fully understand.
	Nevertheless, within that paradigm, if you have it...
	We have seen this game run over and over again with the annual flu shot.
	And they would start manufacturing this thing months and months in advance and say, well, we think this year it's going to be like this.
	And if that isn't the height of absurdity, what is?
	There's absolutely no way that you know it's going to be.
	It's kind of like what Robert Redfield, Trump's CDC director, is saying.
	Well, we know that bird flu is going to jump to humans.
	And when it does, we know that it's going to kill 25 to 50% of the people who get it.
	It's like, that's total fantasy.
	And so we talked about that type of thing every year we talked about it.
	And for 20 years, Alex had been talking about vaccine adjuvants like mercury and all the rest of the stuff.
	And then what happened?
	When Trump came around, he said, don't worry.
	You know, it's not the bad vaccine that Bill Gates wants us to have.
	No, Trump's going to give us one that's basically just sugar water with some mercury added and some aluminum, you know.
	But yeah, you can take it.
	It's just sugar water.
	Take it for Trump.
	It's 4D chest stuff.
	Well, Michael Yadin explained to the conference, he says, it is impossible, absolutely impossible, to invent, research, test, evaluate, manufacture, gain authorization for, and launch a complex new biological product in under a year, regardless of the amount of money and the people involved.
	See, Trump was just a salesman for that lie.
	It had already been developed quite some time before it.
	So that's the first thing.
	This had been developed for a long time before that.
	They knew.
	They knew what was going on.
	And then he said, these so-called vaccines have numerous features that would give rise to toxicities which professionals in the industry would have known about.
	Just like professionals in the information industry knew about the annual CDC scam about flu shots.
	They knew about the adjuvants and the harm that they did with autism and all the rest of this stuff.
	How dare them tell us to shut up and take the Trump shot?
	It's just sugar water.
	They knew.
	And Michael Yadin is saying the people he worked with at Pfizer knew about all of this stuff.
	He said the COVID vaccines are gene-based products containing a string of genetic information, which is brand new technology.
	And there were no products like that in use, routine use, anywhere else in the world.
	Moderna had existed for 10 years.
	And for 10 years, they had made a lot of money putting out fictional stories on Wall Street.
	And when they pumped the stock up, they'd sell it and make money.
	But the products never came to fruition.
	They were harmful.
	They didn't work.
	The effect of the injections is that the body is forced to manufacture A foreign protein, the spike protein, which is known to be acutely toxic to blood cells.
	And it prompts blood clots.
	And to nerve cells, it causes them to malfunction.
	The body recognizes the spike protein as foreign and launches an autoimmune reaction to attack the cells that produce it, which can lead to various health issues depending on where the reaction occurs in the body.
	The autoimmune reaction can occur in any cell, in any tissue, in any organ.
	Where the injected dose lands.
	And that's why you have things like myocarditis, heart attack, stroke, neurological conditions, or sterility, depending on where it accumulates.
	And that was another thing that I said at the very beginning.
	I said, if you look at Moderna, what they're saying is that, and they set it in that table.
	And Trump set that whole thing up.
	Again, just like he did with gun control, he brings all these executives in from pharmaceutical companies and he says, how long is it going to take you to get a vaccine?
	Well, it's going to take us a couple of years or what.
	Then the next person, well, we can do it a little bit less time and so forth.
	He had them even arranged in the table as to how long it was going to take him.
	It was all a show.
	It was a reality TV show.
	Well, actually, it wasn't any reality to it at all.
	But it's the kind of stuff that he had done all of his life.
	So he has all these people.
	Finally, they get to Moderna.
	And he says, well, we can do it today.
	Because we'll have you, your body will manufacture the vaccine.
	It's like, oh, time out.
	What are we talking about here?
	You go to their website.
	And it says, yeah, we're going to reprogram your body to manufacture this.
	And I said, don't you people have a problem with that?
	I've got a problem with that.
	That's insane!
	And of course, once you start the manufacturing process, where's the off switch, I said from the very beginning?
	Well, it turns out there's not really an off switch.
	It just keeps going.
	He goes back and he says that the instructions for the spike protein were included in the so-called vaccines.
	It's not a mistake.
	The person who chose the spike protein sequence knew of its toxic properties.
	It is not an accident.
	It is a deliberate choice, said Dr.
	Yadin.
	So this is premeditated over a number of years.
	They knew what they were doing because they put this sequence together and they had tested it and so forth.
	And they knew what they were putting in.
	They knew that it was toxic.
	He said the spike protein is not the only egregious ingredient in the COVID injections.
	The lipid nanoparticles, the LMP. The LMPs are tiny particles of fat that allow the payload to disproportionately deposit in the ovaries.
	And he said, we knew going back to 2012 that LNPs, the lipid nanoparticles, lead to disproportionate deposition of the payload into the ovaries when injected into animals and people.
	Now, he said this.
	He called this very early on.
	He said, this is going to sterilize people.
	It's going to harm people.
	A reproduction.
	And he knew that because going back to 2012, they knew that if you encapsulate these genetic instructions to reprogram your body, if you encapsulate them in the LMP, that the LMP is going to accumulate in ovaries and reproductive organs.
	And wherever it goes, if it accumulates in a heart, it destroys the heart.
	If it accumulates in the reproductive organs, it destroys reproductive organs.
	I remember the day I read that paper, he said, I really couldn't sleep.
	The person who chose to use lipid nanoparticles to formulate the Moderna and the Pfizer products knew perfectly well that what they would do is allow them to drift all through the body through membranes as if they weren't there and to disproportionately deposit in your ovaries.
	And when we look at the biodistribution studies that have come out subsequently, we see that that was where they concentrated.
	He said, given that I've told you the first two things, which is that this will induce your body to attack every cell in the body that follows the genetic instructions of the so-called vaccine, and that instruction, by the way, is to make a poison.
	Your body is manufacturing a poison.
	He said, you should no longer be surprised if people have been injured or killed and have had their fertility reduced.
	Yeah.
	To summarize what he says, the COVID vaccines were intentionally designed to injure, to kill, and to cause infertility.
	The depopulation shot.
	And of course, Trump and Trudeau and Boris Johnson and fill in the blank, wherever you live, right?
	All the politicians, regardless of what their political party or supposed political philosophy is, they all marched in lockstep in this global depopulation pandemic.
	All this stuff, unprecedented, but it was a design, a program, and they all betrayed us.
	They're all traitors, and I will never, never support Trump.
	If you understand what happened in 2020, And then you look at how he betrayed his own people at the end of the year.
	How can anybody trust that guy?
	Yes.
	Two evils.
	You had a choice.
	God has delivered us from one of those types of evils, and he is challenging and testing us with the other evil.
	You better understand that.
	So, another local government has called for immediate suspension of the vaccines.
	Not a regional government.
	Not a national government.
	A local government.
	I'm telling you, we've got to stop this at the local level.
	That's our only hope.
	It's not easy.
	Not easy.
	And there may not be any good local people in your area.
	And if there are good local people, they might get them out like they did here.
	You know, getting Frank Church out, putting in this guy who...
	I've never seen a shill like that guy before.
	Anyway, local government of West Australian mining town Port Hedland is calling for immediate suspension of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, quote-unquote, pending an investigation into evidence of excessive levels of synthetic DNA in the shots.
	Now...
	We had seen, you know, six counties in Idaho's regional, kind of a regional government there, but it's local government in Idaho, banning it.
	That's not the same thing as happening in Australia, but it's getting pretty close to it.
	What they did was, if you remember, Ron DeSantis and his Surgeon General, Latipo, I forget its first name.
	They said, well, there's a lot of contamination, DNA contamination in these vaccines.
	And so we're recommending that you not get it.
	But they didn't ban it.
	And Latipo then sent a letter to the FDA asking them to do something, which, of course, is a vain hope if ever there was one.
	Uh, and, uh, some people said, well, maybe, you know, we'll have Latipo as, um, the head of HHS. And it's like, no way, no way.
	And I said that because of the bad blood between DeSantis and Susie Wiles, even before I realized that she was a big pharma lobbyist and still is connected to that marketing, uh, That does big pharma lobbying.
	But no, she doesn't like DeSantis.
	DeSantis got her fired.
	They parted ways, and he got Trump to fire her, and then Trump brought her back in.
	So there's no way that somebody that's associated with DeSantis, I think, there's no way that they're going to get a position there because of her.
	But going back to Australia, they said, Including the dangers of genomic integration, cancer, hereditary defects, and immune system disruption.
	And so this is a special meeting on the 11th of October.
	Port Hedland counselors voted 5-2 in favor of notifying all of Australia's 537 local councils of the evidence of DNA contamination in the vaccines and the associated risks.
	Now, the FDA in America knows it.
	They have been sent notification by the Florida Surgeon General, at the very least.
	And the Australian equivalent of that knows it as well.
	And they're both ignoring it and even lying about it.
	Independent studies in Canada, the U.S., and Germany have previously tested the RNA jabs and found excessive levels of DNA, which is a byproduct of the production process, and it is allowed in amounts of up to 10 nanograms per dose under international regulations.
	However, they found it many, many, many times higher than what is allowed.
	And so they say that they have one of the things found in it is an SV40 Enhancer Promoter.
	They say in this article from Brownstone that that is not the same as the SV40 virus, Simeon virus number 40, that was put into polio vaccines and stuff in the mid-20th century.
	I don't know what the difference is between an SV40 enhancer and an SB40 virus.
	I don't know what the difference is on those two things.
	But anyway, the...
	The FDA and the TGA out of Australia deny that the vaccines contain high levels of DNA or that synthetic DNA poses any safety risks, including this SV40 enhancer promoter.
	Why?
	Well, because they lie constantly.
	They don't have any data about it.
	As a matter of fact, the Australian version of the FDA, the TGA, did not provide any evidence to support the claims.
	They did not refute the work of independent scientists who detected the contamination.
	They mischaracterized the scientists' work.
	They omitted key but inconvenient facts from the statement.
	They claim they've independently tested 27 batches of RNA vaccines for residual DNA levels and found them to be compliant.
	However, nobody can verify this because the TGA fully redacted the results when somebody filed a Freedom of Information request.
	So they give you the paper, but they black everything out.
	How is that allowed, right?
	Is that giving you the information that you requested if you black it out?
	So that's the kind of nonsense that we get from these bureaucracies, and they all do it.
	You know, they do it in America, they do it in Australia, because our governments are run by the intelligence agencies, and these intelligence agencies are all linked in these former British colonies.
	So, of the five I's.
	So how is that complying with a freedom of information request and law if you black everything out?
	And, of course, that also happened in Europe.
	Remember the European Parliament members who said, well, we filed a request about the business dealings between Ursula Fond of lying and Pfizer, and they sent us back these papers.
	But take a look at this.
	And he told them, look, and it's all blacked out.
	Here's another one.
	It's all blacked out.
	Here's the next one.
	It's all blacked out.
	He didn't comply with any of that stuff.
	That's like saying that, you know, because this is a rule instead of a law, You don't have any constitutional protections.
	You don't have any presumption of innocence.
	You don't get any due process.
	You don't get protection from excessive fines because this is a rule.
	It's not a law.
	It's that same kind of stuff.
	And everybody is doing that.
	They come, oh yeah, we could do that too.
	And so it's this epidemic of tyranny that's going around the world.
	But the reality is that just like you have seen with everything else that they push back against, No, no, no.
	That's not allowed.
	And we're not going to take a look at your data.
	We're not going to critique your study.
	We're just going to say, that's fake news.
	We're not going to allow that at all.
	We're not going to look at it.
	We've done our own studies.
	Okay, let me see the data.
	Well, it's all redacted.
	You know they're lying.
	They failed to address the implications of the residual DNA being encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles.
	Which go to every major organ system in the body.
	Western Australian Premier Roger Cook slammed the Port Hedland Council, the local council for passing the motion to alert Australians to the DNA contamination issue.
	But Port Hedland residents who attended the special meeting implored the council to take action.
	As did internationally lauded professor of oncology, a cancer, in other words, Angus Dalgleish.
	He recorded his address in support of the motion.
	Now, listen to this, because there's another Musk connection.
	Professor Dal Glish, who previously sat on the scientific board of mRNA technology company CureVac, Oh, who was it that did that?
	CureVac.
	That was the Musk thing to create mRNA.
	And they got this guy, Angus Dalgleish, a professor.
	He sat on the board, says previously he sat on the board.
	Maybe he resigned when he figured out what this is, and he's now speaking out against the mRNA stuff.
	But I don't see Elon Musk speaking out against it.
	I don't see him divesting himself of his interest in the mRNA manufacturing or CureVac or any of the rest of this stuff, you see?
	Anyway, Dalgleish said that he'd seen an upsurge in aggressive, fast-progressing cancers in his oncology practice amongst patients who had received COVID vaccine boosters, particularly colorectal cancer and blood cancer.
	But Musk evidently doesn't see it or care.
	So he's no longer with CureVac.
	He got off of it.
	He says, we need our health authorities to begin monitoring these trends.
	We need them to develop testing protocols for those exposed to the synthetic DNA contamination.
	And we need to prepare treatment pathways for the inevitable rise in vaccine-induced conditions.
	And cancers.
	Well, one of the people who was on that local council in Australia put that out and said, we have been contacted by so many councils.
	They are ready for this.
	They can't just ignore this.
	We want genuine answers.
	And so a website has been assembled by a group of volunteers.
	All of them with the Port Headland Council motion information and resources to equip Australians to take the matter up with their local governments.
	If it's going to happen, folks, it's going to happen from the bottom up.
	And so, you know, don't look for a savior in RFK Jr.
	Don't look for a savior, of course, in Trump or Musk or any of these people.
	Save yourself.
	That was the message of Shiva.
	And even though he was not on the ballot, I don't even think, in my understanding of a natural-born citizen, he's not qualified to be president.
	But he was qualified to tell people to start from the grassroots up.
	Do something yourself.
	Don't wait for somebody in Washington to do something.
	Don't put your hope in the GOP. Don't go back to sleep now that the GOP has been elected.
	They're not going to do anything at all to help you.
	And so it's really up to you.
	Now, one last thing here.
	We have a new cancer treatment protocol.
	Featuring a horse dewormer and a dog dewormer.
	Horse dewormer being ivermectin, of course.
	The dog dewormer being thin mendazoli, if I'm pronouncing that correctly.
	And then a third thing.
	And I would just say, you know, be careful about these things.
	You know, ivermectin, there's been a lot of talk about how ivermectin has created fertility issues for people.
	But look, if you've got cancer...
	If you're past childbearing ages or something like that.
	We know other things about ivermectin in terms of efficacy.
	I mean, it is way, way, way, way safer than the expensive and cheaper than the expensive chemo stuff.
	But I would still suggest that you take a look at B17. That's one of the reasons why I was so keen to have G. Edward Griffin on.
	Because of the book that he wrote, A World Without Cancer.
	And he took that on early on.
	You know, he and the father of...
	I'm the guy who runs rncstores.com.
	You know, B17, you can get in a tablet form.
	You can get it with the seeds, the natural seeds.
	It's a natural ingredient.
	Why don't you try that first, even before you try ivermectin?
	Or at least try it in addition to the ivermectin.
	But when I had Jedward Griffin on, he said that, you know, it's a guy that he knew socially.
	Who was a doctor, and they had had good luck with this, cured cancer with his dog, and then his nursing staff found out about it, and they had a nurse whose husband had inoperable cancer, and she heard about him saying that he had had success with that with the dog.
	So they did it with her husband, and then all of a sudden, just word of mouth starts doing it.
	Next thing, they're coming after him to take his license, and he asked G. Edward Griffin to write the book.
	A world without cancer.
	By the way, you can get that book, worldwithoutcancer, at rncstore.com.
	But use the code NIGHT. Karen is telling me.
	Use the code NIGHT. Save 10%.
	That's great.
	I mean, it's a little bit there, but the key thing is I want you to get that information.
	Get that information.
	Get the natural ingredients that are going to fight this, and maybe some other things, too.
	The apricot seeds.
	We're told that God has...
	Perhaps that's coming up, but I think it's also something that's currently present.
	Created these plants for healing.
	Healing of the nations.
	So investigate it.
	Find out about it.
	And again, be aware, if you're younger, of issues with ivermectin and some of these others.
	But it's a very well-known protocol.
	It's been around for a very, very long time.
	Max Alva says, we should create a legislative credit score system attached to digital IDs required for members of Congress to vote.
	They can be shut off if a legislator's constitutional credit score gets too low.
	I like that idea.
	Yeah, a social constitutional score instead of a social credit score.
	I like that.
	Great idea.
	Dougalug, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	Birdhouse Blues.
	CBDC is here.
	It's in the shadows if you look at your banking settings and your security measures.
	Drip, drop, drip, drop.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, we do it from the inside and we do it iteratively, right?
	And, of course, the disruption is coming.
	That'll be coming.
	12 June 1776.
	Thank you very much.
	He says, nothing like MAGA blocking chains of freedom...
	And the Freedom Cities.
	You can live in the Freedom Cities with your blockchain, Bitcoin, freedom and everything tracking you all the way.
	Jason Barker.
	Thank you for the tip, Jason.
	I appreciate that.
	Thank you very much.
	So congrats on the new addition to the Knight family, Pappy.
	Thank you.
	By the way, I got your email, and did you be able to get back to him today, Jason, about the PayPal thing?
	I'll just tell you real quickly, the PayPal thing, that's not the way that it began with me.
	So he's having some issues with PayPal.
	They just cut me off without any notification and without any explanation.
	It was both PayPal and Venmo.
	I got banned.
	Still can't use them even for personal stuff.
	And I spent two hours with a guy on the phone.
	And he says, I can't find anything here.
	What's going on with any of that stuff?
	You know, there's not some suspicious transaction or anything like that that's fine.
	He says, just a statement saying, shut this account down now.
	Like, okay, I understand what that's about.
	Three years ago.
	So if you're having problems with them, I don't know.
	Maybe they've changed the way that they've done it.
	That was three and a half years, almost four years ago.
	They did it.
	So maybe they've changed their stuff now, but I don't know.
	And Jason, I don't have it here, but Jason had some wonderful things to talk about with answered prayer, and I really appreciate that.
	You know, we need to all tell each other when God answers our prayers, and we need to give God the glory for ending abortion, not Trump, not the Republican Party.
	I ran like mad whenever it happened.
	I mean, it's like the building was on fire, the way they ran away from it.
	Somebody set the Supreme Court on fire, run!
	But, yeah, give God the glory, and thank Him for answered prayers with that.
	And whenever we have answered prayers, as Jason did in his family, with the little boy who still has some issues, and we have seen prayer answered with Whistler, but we still need more prayer.
	He's not there 100%.
	And he can't do much without it coming back.
	So we're just praying that he'll be fully healed.
	It's been a long, long recovery so far.
	But not as bad as it's been for some people.
	Some people have done this for years and have never recovered.
	And just in case you want to know what we did, you know, we did.
	We started with magnesium, which there have been some statements from people who suffered for years with it, and they said that magnesium helped to alleviate that.
	So we started giving them big doses of that.
	Vitamin C. Vitamin C in a lipid format to help the absorption.
	We also did vitamin C injections, you know, drip injections along with glutathione.
	And we did a lot of detox stuff.
	I mean, we had Zeolite.
	We also had a listener generously sent us some detox foot pads, did that.
	I mean, we did everything that was sent to us.
	I could just go on and on.
	We did so many things.
	We don't really know what worked, but we give God the glory and the credit because we know that he's the one who works.
	We'll be right back.
	The Common Man.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Wright Overture says, my sister was diagnosed with an extreme form of brain cancer and given months to live.
	That was 17 years ago.
	God healed her.
	Yes.
	You know, I thank you for sharing that.
	Lee Strobel wrote a book, The Case for Christ.
	He was a journalist, investigative journalist, and he was not a believer.
	His wife became a believer, so he's going to debunk it, and he wound up becoming a believer.
	I've seen that story so many times.
	As a matter of fact, it was E. Wallace Warner, same thing.
	He was a cold case detective, and he got into it the same way.
	He now does cold case Christianity.
	I've interviewed him a couple of times with his books.
	And so, anyway, Lee Strobel wrote The Case for Christ, but he also wrote a book I think you'd enjoy called The Case for Miracles, and he points out that, you know, the Bible itself...
	It's a very important miracle.
	But when he talks about miracles, he said, doctors believe in miracles more than any other demographic when they ask them.
	And 60-some-odd percent of them believe in miracles.
	They've seen miraculous healing over and over again.
	And so he talked to people, skeptics as well as believers, and I thought it was a pretty balanced description of it.
	And so the case for miracles, I would suggest that to people.
	But especially the book from George Mueller.
	That's one miraculous answer to prayer after the other his entire life.
	And, you know, it was pretty amazing.
	And everybody in Bristol, England, knew of him and knew about him, including people like Charles Dickens, who were there.
	Interesting life that he had.
	And he kept a diary, something we should all do.
	Shield your eyes.
	Was replying to Trump Burger Forever, said the Trump tards could quite literally be shipped off to the gulags on cattle cars and still be optimistic.
	That's right.
	It's a 4D cattle car.
	Don't worry, Trump's on our side.
	He's right there.
	We have Alex up there with a bullhorn telling everybody, it's okay, he's good, he's got it under control.
	And Max, MMR and TPAT are the most dangerous ones.
	And RFK Jr.
	said the hep B given in the first month to babies makes them 1100% more likely to go autistic.
	But they jab away.
	And they often secretly give it.
	Yeah, that's the thing that's concerning when you look at this.
	They will do that and not tell anybody.
	Do not obey.
	I told Travis when he was there with the baby, I said, you know, don't let him out of your sight.
	And I don't think he did.
	I mean, Travis has been injured with vaccines.
	He saw what happened to the whistler.
	I mean, he, you know, it's been a difficult lesson for our family to learn, but, you know, it's been there.
	Do not obey.
	He says, if you value your self-preservation, you will not leave your health to strangers who don't care about you except to get your payment.
	For less than service.
	If that isn't true at all.
	First, do no harm.
	They don't care about that.
	It's not even last on their list.
	It's not even on their list.
	They don't care if they harm you at all.
	They don't care.
	And it's very much like education.
	If you care about your kids, don't ship them off to be educated by strangers that you don't know anything about.
	And that includes private schools.
	That includes charter schools.
	It's not just the public schools, right?
	Let's talk a little bit about the war and what might likely happen with Trump.
	Wars, plural.
	Ukraine launched major drone strikes on Moscow, halting air traffic, and of course, Russia, same thing over the weekend.
	The drone wars, kind of like Star Wars, I guess, except not clone wars, they're drone wars.
	Massive drone strike rattled Moscow and its suburbs overnight into Sunday, injuring a woman temporarily halting traffic at some of Russia's busiest airports, while a huge nighttime wave of Russian drones targeted Ukraine.
	This came after Putin signed into law a pact with North Korea Saturday night, obliging the two companies to provide immediate military aid using all means, if either of them is attacked.
	And so there's a lot of North Korean troops.
	I've seen anywhere.
	This article says 3,000.
	I've seen other articles that say 10,000.
	Who knows, right?
	When you're talking about a war, the fog of war, which is a fog of lies and propaganda, and the difficulty of being able to see anything that is there and having to rely on Government statements of governments and participants who are certainly going to lie to you.
	They're killing each other.
	That's why I don't talk about the details of these wars.
	That's why I don't talk about the details in Gaza.
	When we look at what's going on in Gaza, you don't have to know the details to be able to see the asymmetry that is there.
	And the fact that this has continued, relentlessly continuing, the fact that those two things there, the sustained war that is there and the targeting of civilian populations, that tells you everything that you need to know about how unjust that war is.
	But when we look at Ukraine, why is this happening after the election?
	Well, they're jockeying for position.
	Both Moscow and Ukraine are lying to everybody, says they're keeping a tight lid on casualty figures, and they don't want to talk about it since the start of the war, and they certainly don't want to talk about what is happening with this.
	You can't trust anything that any of them say about any of this stuff anyway.
	On Sunday, the Kremlin's official spokesperson voiced cautious optimism about Trump's upcoming presidency, saying, quote, at least he talks about peace, and he doesn't just talk about confrontation.
	And see, that's the key thing that we can see that is happening in Israel.
	The Israelis are not talking about peace.
	They're talking about more and more confrontation, more and more escalation.
	Let's take it to Iran or whatever.
	And that's what you see from the Trump administration as well.
	The Biden administration as well.
	The signals are positive.
	Trump during his election campaign, said the Russians, said that he perceives everything through deals, that he can make deals that will lead everyone toward peace, said Dmitry Peskov.
	He does not talk about a desire to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia.
	And this favorably distinguishes him from the current U.S. administration.
	That's right.
	The current Biden administration only wants war.
	And it's not going to be satisfied with anything except total defeat of Russia.
	Same thing with Israel.
	Netanyahu's not going to be satisfied with anything less.
	Then a complete eradication of all the people that are there.
	And that's why he just fired Gallant, his defense minister, because his defense minister was saying, we don't need to do that.
	So he got rid of him.
	So again, when you see that, you know who is pushing the war.
	Well, here's what a Trump peace plan might look like and why Russia might agree to it.
	This is coming from Andrew Koribko on Substack.
	As a matter of fact, there's a couple of different ideas that people have about what a Trump peace plan would look like.
	Here's one that was put up.
	This, I think, was put up by Michael Tracy.
	This was an interview...
	Mike Waltz has now been announced as Trump's national security advisor.
	Waltz said, well, he's very focused on ending the war rather than perpetuating it.
	And, you know, really crafting a strategy to get both sides of the table.
	I think it's perfectly reasonable this is going to come to some type of diplomatic resolution.
	And he said, And so he says, so I think that that will get Putin to the table.
	We have leverage, like taking the handcuffs off of the long-range weapons that we provided Ukraine as well.
	So even though they're talking about a deal, there's some very dangerous brinksmanship as part of that.
	But Biden is not even talking about any kind of a deal.
	He just wants to overthrow Russia.
	And that's really the NATO agenda.
	It's not just Biden.
	That is all of NATO. Trump's pledge to resolve the Ukrainian conflict in 24 hours is unrealistic.
	He will inevitably propose a peace plan at some point in time, thus raising questions about what it would look like and whether Russia would agree to it, writes Andrew Koribko.
	He'll seek to freeze the conflict along the line of contact.
	And this is why you're seeing this escalation over the weekend.
	They're all jockeying for position.
	They're all trying to move the line of conflict.
	Because what will likely happen, as he points out, is that Trump's not going to come in and say, well, you've got to pull out of this area and give that back.
	He's just going to say, okay, we're going to stop it right now.
	Everybody stop the shooting.
	Hatfield and McCoys, we're going to stop it right now.
	And what you've got, you keep that.
	And so that's why the sudden escalation that you see happening here.
	So it's not expected to coerce Ukraine into withdrawing from regions that it's gotten into, nor is Russia expected to obtain control over them by the time that Trump's proposal is made.
	The U.S. might dangerously escalate in order to de-escalate, to stop a run on the river if Ukraine is then routed.
	This could take the form of threatening a conventional NATO intervention if the political will exists to spark a Cuban-like brinksmanship crisis.
	Now, this could even happen in the transition period by the Biden people.
	I kind of don't think it will.
	I think, you know, when you look at what is happening, it's just they're all kind of licking their wounds and, you know...
	Staring at his face saying, what happened?
	We had a billion dollars.
	How do you lose with a billion dollars?
	Saturday Night Live said, yeah, I scream that into my pillow every morning.
	I bet she really is screaming now into the pillow every morning.
	Russia will almost certainly be asked to freeze the conflict along the line of conflict.
	line of contact, I should say, without rescinding its territorial claims, just like Ukraine won't either.
	And they'll do so under the threat of Trump ramping up military support to Ukraine if the Kremlin refuses to cease hostilities.
	Trump's advisor suggested that he do precisely that as punishment for Russia, rubbing whatever peace plan that he might ultimate, if they rubbish, whatever peace plan he ultimately In other words, if they trash it.
	Given Putin's consummate pragmatism, he might very well comply, but he could also request that Trump coerce Zelensky into making some concessions to facilitate this.
	This might include things like rescinding the 2018 constitutional amendment, making NATO membership a strategic objective.
	Or they could freeze further weapon shipments to Ukraine.
	They could carve out a buffer zone within part of the Ukrainian territory.
	These are the types of things that were suggested at the very beginning.
	Why don't we just keep a buffer zone there between the two and stop the hostilities?
	But Biden did not want to do that.
	The reason for this cautious optimism is because it would provide a face-saving means for Russia to freeze the conflict despite not achieving its maximum objectives instead of risking a Cuban-like brinksmanship crisis by rejecting Trump's expected proposals.
	So, as he points out, Trump's focus, and really the focus of the deep state, and we've seen this for a very long time.
	When I had the guy in, I forget what his name was, he wrote the book called Four Battlefields.
	And I had him on because I wanted to talk to him about what was going on with AI and autonomous killing machines and about Eric Schmidt's involvement in all of that in the Pentagon.
	And his book was very good.
	But when he wrote the book, those were things that I was interested in and were really kind of side issues.
	The four battlefields were the four areas of conflict with China.
	Because he's part of the, I think it's a project for New American Century, I think he was part of.
	And all of these neocons and warmongers that are there in the Pentagon, they all want war with China.
	And as this guy says, Trump's people are focused on a Chinese-centric new Cold War.
	And that's really what most of the deep state wants to see.
	And so all those four battlefields were the four areas of conflict that they perceived with China.
	And most of those revolved around artificial intelligence and getting the high ground of the next generation of autonomous killing machines and that type of deal.
	But there are, of course, other considerations.
	And I thought it was kind of interesting to see the old warhorse, warmonger, Lindsey Graham, Putting this in real crass economic and land issues, resource issues.
	In the same way that the Israelis do when they talk about what they want to do.
	Here's Lindsey Graham talking about the assets of Ukraine that can't be allowed to fall into the hands of the Russians.
	They're sitting on 10 to 12 trillion dollars of critical minerals in Ukraine.
	They could be the richest country in all of Europe.
	I don't want to give that money and those assets to Putin to share with China.
	If we help Ukraine now...
	They can become the best business partner we ever dreamed of.
	That 10 to 12 trillion dollars of critical mineral assets could be used by Ukraine and the West, not given to Putin and China.
	This is a very big deal, how Ukraine ends.
	Let's help them win a war we can't afford to lose.
	Let's find a solution to this war.
	But they're sitting on a gold mine to give Putin 10 or 12 trillion dollars of critical minerals that he will share.
	We need to have that.
	China is ridiculous.
	All wars are banker's wars.
	Or Lindsay's wars, right?
	Lindsay's wars are banker's wars.
	Lindsay's sounds just like somebody on the British Empire, you know?
	We've got to invade Africa because they've got all these resources there.
	We can't let the French have them, or whatever.
	We've got to get all those natural resources.
	We'll loot them.
	It's kind of like The Man Who Would Be King.
	One of my favorite movies.
	I know it's got some Masonic stuff in it, but, you know, Sean Connery.
	And Michael Caine.
	And they come in and they make a pact in front of supposedly Rudyard Kipling.
	And he says, yeah, we're going to Afghanistan.
	We're going to loot the country seven ways a Sunday and we're going to make ourselves kings of Afghanistan.
	And nothing really changes.
	Lindsey Graham could be in that movie.
	It wouldn't be such a good movie anymore.
	They'd be talking about Putin.
	They'd be talking...
	We can't let him have...
	We've got to go into the Ukraine.
	The Ukraine is where we go.
	Yee-haw!
	Just put Lindsey on...
	Have him straddle a bomb on a B-52 thing and just open up the bomb doors and let him go out like Slim Pickens, you know?
	Ukraine!
	Here we come.
	Right now.
	Nuclear bomb.
	And so, when we come back, we're going to take a look at...
	Some of the other issues here.
	And we're going to take a look at education.
	Because Trump is now talking about education.
	And I've got something that I want to say about that.
	DGA, thank you for the tip.
	It says, David, every single appointment from Trump is bought and paid for by AIPAC. That's right.
	I went to open secrets to confirm.
	Will Alex call out Trump for adding bubble boy Rubio?
	No.
	I forgot about that bubble boy thing.
	Little Marco.
	He's being trumped out there as Secretary of State and is like, I'm sorry, what are his qualifications for that?
	I don't know.
	As a matter of fact, most of these things, there aren't any qualifications to be head of a corrupt empire.
	Are there?
	What qualifies should it be that?
	No, he'll call it 3D chess.
	That's right.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about education.
	And I've got some things to say about some of the other Trump appointees, but I want to get to this education thing first.
	So we'll take a break, and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back.
	Nathan Bedford Forrest, 1865.
	He gets there firstest with the mostest.
	I really don't know if the Biden administration is licking their wounds.
	I think they all work together in this charade.
	I agree.
	Biden's last speech made it look like he was faking his dementia all along.
	Who knows?
	I mean, I saw the pictures of him stumbling on the beach and Jill kind of ignoring him.
	That was pretty sad and pathetic.
	I'd almost feel sorry for him if he wasn't one of the most evil people I've ever seen in politics.
	And I've watched this guy since the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings back in the 1980s.
	He's one of the most evil totalitarian people.
	And of course, Trump.
	When you look at Trump and his flaunting of his sexual debauchery and everything, all these years being a best friend of Jeffrey Epstein, but even before that, as I said, divorcing his wives and then trashing them in public like he did when he fired people out of his cabinet, it's just absolutely astounding to me to see all of these so-called Christian leaders Wrapping themselves around him.
	Jeff Weiss, who...
	Trent Luce has got a program.
	He's out in the Midwest.
	It's a very good program.
	Farmers and Liberty and things like that.
	I forget what the name of it is, but I did an interview with him, and he also does once a week.
	He's got a Christian program.
	Jeff Weiss was on it, and I was just talking to him the other day about What he saw with all this.
	He said, did you see them gathering around singing How Great Thou Art after Trump won?
	He said, do you think they'd be doing that if Trump lost?
	And I said, are you sure they were saying How Great Thou Art or were they saying How Great Trump Art?
	Look at these people publicly praying for Trump and taking selfies of themselves and putting it out there.
	They realize that They've just updated the fair season of the 21st century.
	It's amazing to me.
	But let's talk a little bit about the education stuff.
	Indoctrination.
	You know, that was actually a documentary a few years ago.
	And when we talk about education, Trump has got an idea as to what he would do.
	And he put out a little thing yesterday about his ideas about fixing education.
	And here it is.
	in the administration is closing up the Department of Education in Washington, D.C., and sending all education and education work and needs back to the states.
	We want them to run the education of our children because they'll do a much better job of it.
	You can't do worse.
	No, they won't.
	We spent more money for people by three times than any other nation.
	And yet we're absolutely at the bottom.
	We're one of the worst.
	So you can't do worse.
	We're going to end education coming out of Washington.
	There he is, Exhibit A. We're going to close it up.
	All those buildings all over the place.
	And you have people that in many cases hate our children.
	We're going to send it all back to the states.
	Thank you very much.
	So there you go.
	The tranny, blue-haired teachers that are sexualizing your kids, they'll get a block grant from the federal government instead of the Department of Education.
	How about that?
	You feel better about that now?
	Now that Trump is in, feel free to send your kids off to the pubic schools to be sexually abused and indoctrinated and gaslit about gender, turned into communists and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's fine.
	Now Trump is there, and he's going to change the financial structure of it.
	You know, the Department of Education was created in 1980 when, in the midst of the election, Jimmy Carter created it.
	There had been a Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
	What they did was they took health and welfare and split it off into HHS. And then they took education and made that a separate department.
	And Reagan said, I'm going to get rid of it.
	Reagan didn't.
	Every Republican candidate, pretty much, that's run for president since then said they were going to get rid of the Department of Education.
	This is unusual to hear somebody say they're going to get rid of the Department of Education after the election.
	Usually they just forget about it.
	Trump forgot about it, his first term.
	So we'll see what he does.
	Maybe he will do it.
	But if he does do it, is everything going to be fine?
	You know, I saw that.
	I retweeted it.
	I had a comment.
	I said, you know, our pubic schools are focused on perversion.
	If you think that government at any level should run education, you're just supporting a variation of Hillary's that takes a village to raise a child.
	That's all you're doing.
	I said, government should have no role in education.
	None whatsoever.
	States should not be educating our children.
	You should never abandon your child to the state.
	Never!
	Never!
	If you're going to put them in a school, you better know what's in that school.
	If it's some kind of a charter school or private school, you better be focused on that.
	But you also better understand that the curriculum...
	It's going to be pushed to them one way or the other.
	And you also better understand that even if you like the people and the goals of that school, it all comes down to the classroom teacher.
	And anything can happen in the classroom.
	You're turning your kid over to a total stranger that you don't know.
	And in their custody.
	And just hoping that there's going to be enough people around that something isn't going to happen in today's society.
	You need to look at the world in which we live.
	We live in Sodom and Gomorrah.
	And you better think about that.
	Because there's people who are banging on the door saying, bring them out and give us your children.
	Right?
	The men of Sodom are out there banging on your door.
	Are you going to turn your kids over to them?
	Government should have no role in education.
	I said it invariably leads to a violation of parental rights as well as religious liberty.
	R.L. Dabney, who was Stonewall Jackson's chaplain, went through the war with him until Jackson was killed.
	And after the war, he said, you know, I think one of the key reasons that we wound up having this was because of the government schools in Massachusetts.
	And he said they really fired people up on these issues and, you know, sent them off to war.
	But beyond that, he said, we need to think about this from a Christian perspective.
	So you need to understand that education is first and foremost about what today we would call a worldview.
	And you need to understand that that is the job of parents to give that to their children.
	And he further said that if you have government-run schools, they're always going to be in conflict with the establishment of religion.
	Because he said, make no mistake about it, you can't have an education without teaching some kind of religion.
	Now today, the religion is Marxism, we've got LGBTism, and all the rest of the stuff.
	They have their worldview, they have their gods that are fiercely worshipped, even if they are atheists.
	They worship these gods.
	And they have certain things that you must do, certain things that you may not do.
	And these are the things that are being taught to your children all the time.
	And so that's what we see that has been enacted.
	Education is inextricably attached to religion now you can teach somebody how to do a trade and in terms of a vocational school or something like that that's different if you're going to be teaching them the general education that is taught k-12 and in college that has whether you recognize it or not a deep component of education of culture of worldview And of course we've now seen that,
	in addition, weaponized against the parents.
	And so I put all that out.
	I said state education was a plank of communism.
	Now it is bipartisan conventional wisdom.
	Because we're still going to have a state educating under that program, you know.
	It wouldn't be the federal government pulling some of the strings, but it'd still be putting the money there.
	And as long as people are dependent on money from Washington, guess what?
	Somebody, somewhere, sometime, is going to start pulling the strings again.
	And I don't think they'd stop pulling the strings even if they do block grants with this stuff.
	Washington ought to get out of this completely, and that includes the money that is going there.
	So I put that up and I only had, you know, I have, it's amazing to me, I saw somebody that had, it was sent to me, it wasn't somebody that I follow, and I look at it and they have, they didn't say anything.
	They said absolutely nothing.
	And they had 8,700 views.
	I thought, well, that's interesting.
	Who is this person?
	How many followers do they have?
	And I looked at them.
	They had about 100,000 followers on Twitter.
	And they got 8,700 views.
	And I look at this and I supposedly have 137,000 followers on Twitter.
	And I retweet this thing about Trump and I get 246 views.
	246 views.
	I just don't spend any time on Twitter anymore except to post stuff up.
	Even that is a waste of my time, quite frankly.
	But I did have one person out of the 246 people who saw that.
	One person said, so is it a move in the right direction or not?
	Folks, we're not moving the ball at all.
	Government, the state educating your children, it's the state educating your children.
	I don't care who's writing the checks, it's the state educating your children.
	You're still turning your kids over.
	I said, you understand this is a distinction without a difference.
	That if you're going to have the state educate your kids, that's the problem.
	Can't you see the problem?
	Yes, it's even worse when it's the federal government.
	The federal government is, the higher up you go in education, the higher up you...
	When I was a kid, the states were, the education was local.
	It was community-based.
	And then it very rapidly, as the states started to take over more and more control, it very rapidly went from the state to the federal government.
	But I don't want this, the states shouldn't be involved.
	The region, like the state of Tennessee, why are they involved in educating kids?
	No reason at all.
	You know, it doesn't take a lot of money to educate a kid.
	It takes time.
	It takes devotion.
	It takes parents.
	It doesn't take money.
	Some of the best educated kids that I've known...
	Are homeschool kids whose parents are poor because they've chosen to spend their time with their kids rather than becoming slaves of the corporate masters, which is why I was talking about the program that is happening in Phoenix.
	Where you've got these engineers who are just expected to sacrifice their lives.
	You're going to work 12 to 16 hours a day.
	When I call you, you're going to come in.
	I don't care what your family life is.
	You're going to stay here.
	Even if you've got nothing to do, you're going to stay here.
	That's the culture in Taiwan.
	That's the culture in a lot of Asian countries.
	That's the culture that they're trying to inculcate in you through the schools, through the universities.
	And to think that your life depends on some corporate job.
	No, your life is with your family and your children.
	That's your life.
	So, one of the topics of the United Teachers of LA meeting was how to be a teacher and an organizer and not get fired.
	How to not get caught.
	You're going to be a communist organizer, but you don't want to get caught.
	So it doesn't matter what the principal wants.
	It doesn't matter what the school district wants.
	It doesn't matter what Governor DeSantis wants or whatever.
	And we've seen this in Florida.
	We've seen it in Texas when they pass measures.
	You get these teachers go on TikTok and say, well, I don't care what they say.
	When I'm in the classroom, I'm in control.
	And I'm going to do whatever I wish with these kids.
	And they do.
	A lot of us that have been to those protest actions have brought our students.
	Now, I don't take a student in my personal car.
	Now, in this particular thing, they're talking about an anti-Israel rally, but they're still talking about political activism.
	I have members of our organization who are not part of the LA United School District, and so I get them to take the kids in the cars.
	So we're sneaking around in the back.
	So what do you think they're going to do with the rest of this stuff?
	Then you've got Byron Donalds, a Florida congressman, who says that FEMA should be ripped out of DHS and should report directly to the White House.
	You see, this is what I talk about when I say rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
	FEMA shouldn't even exist.
	Byron Donalds is pretty young, so he probably doesn't remember a time When there was no FEMA? I do.
	I grew up in Florida.
	We had hurricanes all the time.
	We didn't have FEMA at all.
	Didn't need them.
	They became a big problem once we moved up to North Carolina.
	Like I said, it was a big problem.
	We had people on the Outer Banks who had some property on the Outer Banks, friends of ours.
	They talked about it.
	A lot of people were talking about how heavy-handed FEMA was.
	But it's not...
	Where in the Constitution do you find this, Byron?
	Please explain to me why the federal government should be doing this at all.
	And this is from the Daily Wire.
	It's called Trump Wins.
	You know, the headlines that you see on this stuff.
	When it comes to FEMA, he says, my recommendation for the Trump transition team is that FEMA becomes a standalone agency that directly reports to the White House.
	Would that have helped with Biden?
	Right?
	Or would it have been worse?
	Right?
	Why do we even need to have FEMA? You don't need it.
	There's no authority for it in the Constitution.
	And you need to start thinking outside the box.
	You know, you need to think about it wasn't all that long ago that government schools were not really a big part of our society.
	And once they did become a part of our society, you know, when Karen and I were growing up, the first thing you noticed once it became ubiquitous in my parents' generation, not everybody finished high school.
	You know, finishing high school is like getting a college degree today.
	It was really amazing that my uncle went to graduate school and became a college professor and everything.
	That was very unusual in those days.
	But to go ahead and finish high school, that was kind of something that people would aspire to, but not everybody did it.
	It wasn't necessary to function in society either at that time.
	But then when we went to school, it was pretty much everybody's.
	It was a bad mark if you dropped out of high school or whatever.
	But now these things get inculcated and they become what the society thinks has to be done.
	But it doesn't have to be done that way.
	And what we saw in the middle of the 20th century was how the schools were weaponized to divide.
	And it wasn't even weaponized like it is now.
	It just kind of de facto happened that if you put a bunch of kids together in this Lord of the Flies group thing, they start acting together collectively.
	And that's the generation gap they started talking about.
	It started creating a wedge between parents and their children.
	I saw that when I was a child.
	People that are our age didn't like their parents and that type of stuff.
	And that was being pushed by that.
	Now, it is really being weaponized and really targeted.
	So, Trump can close the U.S. Department of Education.
	Here's how, says the Christian Post.
	U.S. Parents Involved in Education fully supports President Trump's platform to close the U.S. Department of Education.
	Our organization, that's the name of the organization, U.S. Parents Involved in Education.
	We support it.
	Our organization believes that we must maintain a balance of power between states and the federal government.
	So there should be a balance of power as to who raises your kids, right?
	Do you want your kids raised by the state government or by the federal government?
	None.
	None.
	And if you really want parents who are involved in education, they'd be called homeschoolers.
	These parents are telling you that you're involved in education.
	And yet the reality is that here again, just like we see with the climate stuff, People are going to let their guard down.
	They're going to think everything is fine now, because Trump's in charge.
	So they said, here's what we think should be done in five steps.
	This is what our organization thinks is a blueprint that he should do.
	First of all, send all program management and funding to the states, including Pell Grants for college.
	Well, you know, we had a literacy rate that was pretty close to 100% at the time of the American Revolution.
	We didn't have money from Washington.
	It didn't exist yet.
	We didn't have money from King George to do that.
	People sought an education because they valued it.
	They learned to read because they wanted to read the Bible.
	It was a very different society.
	We don't need to be bribed to have concern for our children, do we?
	Number two, repeal all laws permitting federal intervention in K-12.
	Privatize college loan programs through savings and loan institutions.
	You see, it's all about money.
	And they recognize that money is used as a tool of control.
	Well, if money is used as a tool of control, then why don't we just stop all the money from Washington and the state?
	Because it's going to be used to control us in ways that we don't like.
	Eliminate all offices and divisions in the U.S. Department of Education and related spending.
	Reduce federal tax collection.
	Shifting education and revenue responsibilities entirely back to the states.
	And so on.
	We look at, this is Jay and Jessica, who follow us live usually.
	They replied in response to someone who put up a, and I mentioned this briefly yesterday, put up an op-ed piece.
	Trump's win suggests that we are Nineveh, not Sodom.
	Well, I'm sorry, but I don't see any repentance in this country.
	And when I look at the schools, when I look at the pubic schools, all I see is Sodom.
	That's what I see there.
	Courageous attorneys, it says in this article, many brave Americans are still languishing in prison.
	Yes, I agree.
	And why did Trump abandon them?
	He could have pardoned them before he left office.
	I won't get into that again.
	Hopefully he will pardon them, and hopefully he will also pardon the pro-lifers who have been punished.
	I don't see him talking about getting rid of the FACE Act.
	He should.
	He should also follow through on his promise to pardon Ross Ulbricht, and there's many other people.
	Who are in jail for the crime of being in opposition to the Federal Reserve with cryptocurrencies.
	He should pardon them as well.
	But then they talk about these people.
	Courageous attorneys like Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani.
	Are you kidding me?
	Courageous attorneys?
	These are people who lied and grifted their way through these liars and thieves like Sidney and Rudy.
	Rudy was selling million-dollar pardons.
	I talked to John Kiriakou.
	It was a CIA whistleblower who exposed Gina Haspel's lies to get us into the Iraq War.
	They put him in jail.
	He served his time.
	He just wanted to clear his record so that he'd get his pension.
	He had a pension that was worth like $700,000 or something.
	So he met with Rudy and says, oh, so we're here.
	I want to talk about this.
	And so Rudy says, oh, I'll be right back.
	He gets up to go to the bathroom.
	And the other two guys that are there say, we can get you a pardon, but it'll cost a million dollars.
	First of all, I'm not paying you a dime.
	I'm not paying for a pardon.
	And he said, and I wouldn't pay a million dollars to get a pension that's worth $700,000.
	But yeah, that's Rudy Giuliani.
	Poor fellow.
	Poor fellow.
	The West's greatest weapon in a war with China?
	Online porn.
	You know, it's kind of interesting.
	I mentioned the fact that you've got a lot of North Korean troops who have gone to Ukraine to fight in Ukraine.
	And again, sometimes the number 3,000, sometimes I see the number 10,000.
	10,000 is what I've seen for the most part bandied around.
	Well, they've gone there and now they have unrestricted access to the internet.
	And now there's been story after story after story about how these North Korean troops in Ukraine have reportedly become addicted to pornography.
	And this person, Michael Deacon, says, this could prove to be a vital military breakthrough.
	And you know, it is used as a weapon.
	It is used as a weapon in the same way that Yuval Harari talks about using video games to pacify people.
	We'll use universal basic income, universal welfare to keep people passive, and we'll use pornography and we'll use video games to keep them from ever doing anything in their life.
	And it truly is a weapon.
	And, you know, it's been used as a weapon against us by the intelligence agencies.
	And, you know, both U.S. and Israel have used that as a weapon against us.
	And I don't mean just as the way Epstein was using it, luring in people, and CIA does that as well, luring in people and taking pictures of them and compromising positions and blackmailing them.
	No, I mean that they use it as a weapon against our population.
	You can take a look at TikTok.
	What does TikTok do?
	China fully understands this.
	The West's greatest weapon in the world with China?
	Online porn.
	Well, China has used TikTok to push this tranny insanity.
	They don't allow that.
	They don't allow that in China at all.
	But they push it really hard in the U.S. using TikTok.
	That's why people are complaining about TikTok.
	It's that kind of weaponized thing.
	But we've seen the CIA doing that.
	They've had programs going back the middle of the 20th century, shortly after they were created, to try to debauch our culture.
	People like Gloria Steinem, part of all of that.
	But all of this stuff that is happening with Hollywood and with the porn industry and everything, that is a real weapon.
	It is a political weapon.
	It is a social weapon.
	It is used to take down and destroy our society.
	But it is ultimately a spiritual weapon.
	And you know, when people are, they don't realize where the source of these things are coming from, they can't really deal with it.
	They said it'll have a destabilizing effect on these previously disciplined, focused, and sexually innocent young men from North Korea.
	Triple X rated porn videos.
	That's what they're putting.
	But, you know, we see this in so many different ways.
	And it's not just a war on individuals, right?
	It's a war on our society.
	It's a war on families.
	It's a war on marriage.
	It's a war on everything.
	You know, the key things always remain the same.
	The lust of the flesh.
	The lust of the eye.
	You know, greed.
	And the pride of life.
	Power and pride.
	Always still there.
	MAGA evangelical leader behind a get-out-the-vote non-profit for Trump.
	porn how many times do we see the downfall of christian pastors over sexual issues like this the former leader of a conservative christian voter outreach program favoring trump in the 2024 election has been arrested for possessing child sexual abuse materials jason yates 55 former ceo of evangelical non-profit my faith votes
	well maybe your faith needs to be focused on something besides politics.
	Faith in politicians.
	I ain't going to take you too far.
	Mattel, meanwhile, has put out movie dolls for the Wicked movie, mistakenly listing a porn site on the packaging.
	And so they've now pulled it back.
	Film's official website is wickedmovie.com, but they put something else on there with a typo.
	So they just meant to send your kids to the occult, and instead they sent your kids to a sex site.
	Oh, sorry, our bad.
	We just meant to get him hooked on magic and the occult.
	Not a problem.
	Mattel was made aware of a misprint on the packaging of the wicked collection dolls.
	Again, this is the depths to which Hollywood has sunk now.
	The fact that they all want to go back and do movies about the villains.
	About the villains.
	We've got to do the Joker.
	We've got to do the Wicked Witch.
	They were foils for the characters, but now you're supposed to identify with the villains.
	Like I said, we're not Nineveh.
	We're Sodom.
	A former OnlyFans star, Nala Ray, goes on a podcast with Lecrae and discusses the price of porn versus the freedom that Christ offers.
	OnlyFans star-turned-Christian Nala Ray opened up about how she became an adult content creator and how Jesus changed her life.
	She left a lucrative career in online porn after meeting her now-husband, a devout Christian.
	She was baptized in December 2023, so she's a pretty new Christian.
	She says she deleted five years' worth of explicit material and now is, quote, consuming Christian content, she said.
	She said growing up, there was a lot of arguing.
	There's a lot of parental infidelity, depression, and the family moved several times, which made it hard for her to find friends, other childhood friends.
	Her dad became a pastor and experienced three consecutive church splits, and he is now facing a prison sentence.
	I don't know what he did.
	She became rebellious, she said, and she acted out when she was 13.
	A teen boy who'd moved in the family's house molested her, twisting how she viewed sex.
	In her mind, sex became associated with power.
	She was a fitness buff, and so she got a message from a random guy saying, you know, you would kill it if you went on to OnlyFans.
	She had not heard about it, but she discovered that she could show more skin, and the more skin she showed, the more money she would make.
	So there you go.
	Right?
	Sex for power and money.
	That's all three of them right there.
	The lust of the eye, the lust of the flesh, the pride of life.
	And you know, so often we look at these things and we think that sex, money, and power are going to make us free, and yet they always used to enslave us.
	That was what happened in her story.
	Promising freedom, they find that they then become slaves of that sin.
	And she and many other people have found out that the real freedom Isn't exactly the opposite of what the society, what Hollywood, what the CIA, what the government, what the culture, what the teachers, what the schools, what your peers are all telling you is exactly the opposite.
	You're not going to find freedom in any of those things.
	Instead, you will find freedom in Christ.
	You'll find him in the Bible.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Hoffman58 says, if your child is in a failing school, you should have school choice.
	Your zip code shouldn't dictate where your children go to school.
	We should never have trusted our children to state-run public school.
	I agree.
	Need to get our kids out, and we need to shut these things down before they completely destroy our society.
	It's getting pretty close.
	Pretty much done.
	M Sellers, during the short time our kids went to public schools, one day I stopped by the school, and they had a practice lockdown going on.
	And they wouldn't let me in to pick up my kids.
	We pulled them to homeschool.
	I agree.
	You know, that was what we were looking at in the 1990s.
	What I was looking at was, what is going on with the schools?
	And they got police in the schools, and they got lockdowns, and they got weapon inspections, and all the rest of the stuff.
	When they were, you know, and they're giving a Ritalin to the boys, it's like, no way we're going into that world.
	They're conditioning everybody to live in a police and surveillance state.
	We're not going to condition our kids to live in that.
	DG8, thank you for the tip.
	It says, David, I'm waiting to see what cabinet position Julie Green gets.
	How great would it be to have a profit?
	Note the spelling.
	P-R-O-F-I-T. And Trump's cabinet.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	North Carolina's recent hurricane alone demonstrates that FEMA needs to be abolished.
	Oh, I agree.
	I agree.
	And then, you know, it's politicized.
	You know, if somebody's got a Trump sign in the yard, just skip it.
	Don't even tell them they can get any money from us.
	Of course, that person was fired and so forth, but, like, it's pervasive.
	Community, look, what do we see in North Carolina?
	Federal government was not there, and...
	When they came, they made things worse.
	First responders were people who had a heart to do it, and they were helping their neighbor.
	That was what America was always about.
	That's what Alexis de Tocqueville talked about when he came to America.
	He came to look at the prison system, and what he found was that, unlike France, socialism, where everybody's sitting back and Waiting for the government to do something.
	If the government doesn't do what they want, they whine about it.
	He said, no, in America, what they do, if they see a need, they start working at it at the local level, and they put together associations and cooperate on things like that.
	And, of course, that's a big part of what homeschooling is.
	People start homeschooling, they wind up just organically coming together with homeschool co-ops and things like that that'll happen.
	Let's talk a little bit more about before we run out of time on the program.
	This I thought was absolutely amazing.
	This is a doctor who surrendered his license because they were going to take his license.
	Why?
	Because he asked a patient.
	And the headline is misleading here.
	This is coming from the Independent, the UK. He says he did not ask her if she had Jesus in her life.
	He just saw that she had an abortion.
	He said, if you need any help with any of that, I know a group that does counseling.
	In other words, if you're struggling with the fact that you'd had an abortion.
	She was so offended.
	She got his license for that question.
	He said, I wasn't trying to proselytize her.
	This is a guy who has practiced for decades.
	Dr.
	Lucian Cox, no longer practicing, faced allegations of improper behavior.
	Again, this is coming out of the UK. An LA gynecologist surrendered his medical license for allegedly hectoring a patient about Jesus and prescribing Bible study after she revealed that she had had an abortion 34 years prior.
	Well, he says he denies all of this.
	Again, they say allegedly.
	The 63-year-old woman went to him for a routine exam.
	The assistant first asked a series of preliminary questions, including whether or not she'd ever terminate a pregnancy.
	She said she had back in 1987.
	And...
	She says that he asked if she had Jesus in her life.
	When the woman told Cox that she was not religious, it says Cox asked if she wanted to go to heaven and avoid the devil.
	None of this is – this is kind of – when I look at this – First of all, I don't believe it, because I think he would say it differently, right?
	This is not Christian-speak, okay?
	I know the Christian lingo.
	I know what somebody would say.
	They would not.
	Do you want to avoid the devil?
	Do you got Jesus in your life?
	A Christian's not going to say that.
	And so that rings just as phony as when Trump said, I just saw your sign out there.
	1 Corinthians is one of my favorite verses in the Bible.
	I was like, you phony.
	Again, it's a shibboleth.
	It doesn't make any difference, right?
	And I subsequently found out that in the UK they do call it 1 Corinthians and 2 Corinthians and things like that.
	You know, it's this little chivalrous, like, you didn't say it the way we all say it.
	But this is not the way we all say it.
	You got Jesus in your life, you want to avoid the devil?
	And so, what happened was, she files this complaint with him.
	He denied making any comments, quote, about the devil or about going to heaven.
	He said he is deeply religious, but he merely advised the patient who had had an abortion, merely advised her about a Bible study program that she might find helpful.
	As always, he said, a chaperone was present during the exam, and nothing happened uneventfully.
	So he's got a witness there to all of this stuff.
	If he had gone to a tribunal before the medical board, his lawyer says he would not have lost his license, and he would not have been disciplined.
	He said he's never been the subject of any prior disciplinary action during his lengthy career as a physician.
	He has been an obstetrician, folks, for 45 years.
	He began in 1979.
	He is now 75 years old.
	And he said rather than go through all of this hassle, he said, just forget it.
	I've turned in my license.
	I don't care.
	I'm ready to quit anyway.
	Rather than proceed to a costly hearing, he just decided to surrender his license as he had closed his office and he had been planning to retire anyway.
	He further denied making any attempt to examine a second patient.
	That was another complaint that was done.
	He said, provide excellent care for thousands of patients in the LA community.
	And of course, he always has a chaperone there to watch what is going on.
	And as we see that kind of pushback, take a look at this.
	In Idaho, A woman has sued the city over police harassment after she protested a drag show is being put on for kids.
	A 62-year-old Idaho grandmother, Darcy Creech, is suing the city of Sun Valley after she was harassed by law enforcement for speaking out against drag shows for kids.
	The incident occurred at a June Pride Festival, which, despite being advertised as, quote, fun for the whole family, unquote, featured a sexualized drag show where children were invited on stage.
	She reportedly fell into an argument with other attendees in which she made clear that she opposed children being involved in drag shows and simulated striptease and simulated sex and all the rest of this stuff.
	I wonder why, you know, what a strange woman she is.
	Isn't it amazing?
	According to the Kootenai Journal, which reviewed the complaint, Creech's views drew the attention of Kyle O'Brien, a police officer on duty, right?
	Except these Irish cops are not like the Irish cops we grew up with.
	Footage from his body camera reportedly recorded him referring to Creech's opinion as, quote, unacceptable.
	And he said he, quote, hated, unquote, the fact that she was protected by the First Amendment.
	He said the quiet part out loud.
	What she does, what she did does not fit the criteria for disturbing the peace.
	Freedom of speech comes into it, and I hate that, he says.
	O'Brien continued to seethe at Creech, and he said, quote, I don't like this because I'm a huge supporter of all this, the Pride Festival.
	I'm not okay with this, so we're going to go talk to her no matter what.
	And then he goes over to her and he says, I'm the city official right now, and you're not allowed to go talk to anybody.
	He also said that he would report her and tell the chief that she's, quote, a person we need to be aware of.
	Yeah.
	Sounds like Dr.
	Zhivago, when Dr.
	Zhivago goes back home.
	And they've taken over his home.
	He was a doctor.
	He's wealthy.
	He had a multiple-story house.
	And they've been relegated to a corner of the attic.
	And, you know, this communist official who's there is watching his every move, trying to get something on him.
	And he's very cordial and obsequious and everything.
	He goes up and he talks to his wife and family.
	They're glad to see him return.
	And this guy's constantly watching him.
	And then finally just says, you've been noticed, citizen, and walks off.
	That's what this guy's like.
	When she left the festival, Officer O'Brien reportedly followed her to her home outside the city limits and confronted her.
	Although he admitted that he was not investigating a crime, O'Brien appeared in his uniform while armed with his gun and flanked by another officer.
	Pacific Justice Institute, the non-profit legal defense organization that is representing Creech, said in a press release last month that she had no alternative way of expressing her opinion, making what she did protected by the First Amendment.
	They said the First Amendment to the Constitution protects individuals from blatant government hostility and also protects those wishing to express potentially unpopular views.
	The Pacific Justice Institute attorney said it is the duty of law enforcement to protect unpopular speakers.
	Peaceful speech should never be the target of those who are charged to equally protect all citizens in the community.
	You know, we used to see this demonstrate when Karen and I went several times to England, and we always used to like to go to Speaker's Corner.
	On Sunday morning, you could – Sunday morning and afternoon – People would literally take a box, like people talk about standing on a soapbox and giving your opinions.
	Well, they literally stand on a box and they would talk about things that were unpopular for the most part.
	Sometimes you'd have somebody up there that was, you know, doing a comedy shtick, but that really wasn't the case in most of these things.
	Most people were up there, they're passionate about politics or religion.
	That's what people get passionate about.
	And so they would stand on the box and they would say all this stuff and there'd be people in the audience and they would yell back in disagreement and things like that.
	And when we went in 1980 and again in 1984, the police would be standing around and they would be there to protect the speaker in case they said something that got people angry enough that they would attack them.
	Then we went back in 2001 with the kids.
	Of course, we took them to Speaker's Corner because we thought it'd be great.
	Well, this time around it was different.
	You'd have Christian speakers that were there and they'd be talking and there would be a group of Muslims.
	There'd be a group of LGBT around them and they're getting increasingly hostile.
	And so there was a crowd, one in particular, this Christian speaker, and there were a lot of Muslim men.
	And they were really getting visually agitated.
	And I saw the cops that were there, the bobbies and so on.
	And they've got, at that point in time, they weren't carrying guns.
	They've now become more like American police officers, but they had walkie-talkies and stuff, and they're starting to whisper into their walkie-talkies, their lapel, and more and more of them are starting to come up.
	So I said, let's get out of here.
	Something's about to happen.
	But they're going to protect the unpopular views of a minority person.
	That's what free speech is about in a free society.
	Now what has happened in the last 25 years, what has happened is you've seen over and over again, the cops now arrest the unpopular Christian speaker.
	And we've seen this happen many times.
	I played the clips several times on the show.
	There's no tolerance for free speech anymore.
	Everybody feels that it needs to be shut down.
	By the way, you know, when we look at...
	What is happening in Australia, talking about the labor government there in Australia is...
	I think it was in Australia.
	I had this a couple of days.
	They are...
	Talking about restricting social media to the age of 16.
	I mentioned this briefly, but I didn't go into the detail.
	And I'm pretty sure this is in Australia.
	ABC, I think, is the Australian Broadcasting Network.
	But how are you going to enforce that?
	This is, and we've seen this type of thing suggested earlier.
	And many conservative states, we don't want kids on with TikTok.
	We don't want them seeing this content and all the rest of the stuff.
	So rather than the parents taking the kids' devices away or not letting them have them at all, right?
	No, we can't do that.
	We're going to have to have law enforcement do this.
	And how's law enforcement going to do it?
	Well, they're going to do it by creating an ID for everybody to get on the Internet.
	That's the back door to this type of thing.
	It's a great idea for kids to not be on social media, but it's a great idea for the parents to do it, not for the government to do it.
	And yet, in this, they say, well, parents need to have the support of the government in order to do this.
	Why do we have to do that?
	Why are we so helpless?
	Why do we constantly try to create this omnipotent government to do everything for us?
	Because we don't have the will to do it for ourselves.
	And of course, that is what they're trying to do, is try to create a God-like government that is all-powerful, all-knowing, omnipresent in your life.
	I want to say to parents, they said, we're on your side.
	No, they're not.
	They want to replace the parents.
	And they don't support the family whatsoever.
	We don't think that TikTok can be made safe for children.
	We don't think that Snapchat can ever be made safe for children.
	And we don't think that Instagram can be made safe for children.
	Well, you know what?
	I don't think their government schools can be made safe for children.
	Let's start with that.
	The survey of more than 1,000 Australian parents found 67% want to be able to decide on social media access on their children's behalf rather than have a non-negotiable ban.
	The parents really want to be and to think that they should be the decider here.
	Parents are rightfully the gatekeepers for their children's activities and their experiences.
	And yet, that is not what is happening.
	Octo spook.
	That grandmother needs a medal and the keys to the city to peek in on the other crimes and the other debauchery that is happening there.
	I agree.
	But that's what we're going to see continually pushed to us.
	Well...
	Time doesn't permit us to get into the robo-dogs, but I'll just show you this.
	This is coming from, I think this is actually, I don't have the article in front of me, I think this is actually coming from an Eastern European country, I think it was Poland, where they've got an underwater dog.
	And just look at this, and of course the sound that you hear is the sound that this thing is making as it's going underwater.
	Kind of eerie, isn't it?
	Kind of sounds sci-fi.
	And of course as that is happening, we have Donald Trump Mar-a-Lago now has one of these robo-dogs patrolling the grounds there at Mar-a-Lago and surveilling everybody that's there.
	That's actually put there by the Secret Service, not by Donald Trump.
	And I think the Secret Service prefers that to the German Shepherds that Biden had.
	At least the robo-dog does not bite.
	Well, that's all we have time for today, so thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day, and we will see you tomorrow.
	music
	music The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲