Mon 11Nov24 David Knight UNABRIDGED Personnel IS Policy...Susie Wiles, Tom Homan, Rick Scott, Brian Hook & more
|
Time
Text
Music. Music.
Using free speech to free minds.
Music.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The Clock Strikes 13 The Clock Strikes 13 It's Monday, the 11th of November, year of our Lord 2024.
Well, today is Veterans Day.
We're not going to be talking about war.
Primarily, we'll be talking, though, about the political war.
Of course, there's a spiritual war involved in it as well.
You know, personnel is policy, isn't it?
That's the axiom.
And boy, is that true.
And we're already starting to see that in major ways with Trump's chief of staff pick.
We're going to take a look at her background.
What has been scrubbed about her background recently?
And how does it explain some of these other picks?
And of course, we have a pick for ice.
An ice pick, I guess.
This guy is very scary.
Don't give him an ice pick.
And we'll talk about what is perhaps coming up.
How is this going to operate?
And then we'll take a look at Elon Musk and what his money has bought him.
The most powerful unelected person politically in U.S. history.
We'll be right back.
Well, there's been a back and forth there's been a back and forth about what is going to happen with RFK Jr.
I said from the very beginning, I didn't think he'd last very long.
I thought he'd last longer than two days.
I thought Trump would milk it a little bit longer than that.
But it appears that there's some other things that are happening in the background.
And I don't think it's unrelated to the person who is now Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles.
I mentioned it in passing.
I said, yeah, there's a lot of bad blood.
Between her and DeSantis, she's been a campaign consultant for a lot of different campaigns.
That one, however, did not turn out well in terms of the aftermath.
DeSantis did get elected, but there were some repercussions after that.
We'll talk about the timeline here.
But I said, because of that bad blood, You had some people who were pushing for Trump to put in Latipo, who is the Surgeon General in Florida that DeSantis has worked with, to push back against the vaccines, to at least say, well, we don't recommend them anymore.
But again, if you want to get these things banned, you know what?
That's going to have to happen, I think, at the local level.
I don't think you're going to get any of these people at the state level.
I know you're not going to get anybody at the federal level.
This is a vain hope.
That some people are still pushing out there.
We've got Peter McCullough saying, can we get Trump to ban these vaccines?
Good luck with that.
How naive is he?
Like I said, the people who are medical professionals, very slow to catch on to what's going on here because this pandemic, quote-unquote pandemic, was always political from the very beginning.
A lot of them still don't understand the politics of all this stuff.
Trump will never, never admit that the vaccines are ineffective or dangerous.
He'll never admit that.
That would be a major black eye for him, and he is not going to do that.
But I also don't think that you're going to see Latipo put in, and now there's a pushback against RFK Jr.
Now, there was just one report that I've seen, and that came out of the UK, Telegraph, saying Trump campaign is quietly distancing itself from RFK Jr.
after new vaccine safety comments.
I don't think it's about that at all.
I think it's not after new comments.
He hasn't said anything different about the vaccines than he's been saying all along.
I think it's the new chief of staff, Susie Wiles.
And we'll talk about her background here, but this is what the UK Telegraph says.
It's very interesting.
But it has all the fingerprints of a hit piece that came from somebody inside the Trump transition team.
Trump's team appeared to be quietly distancing itself from RFK Jr.
in the immediate aftermath of the election amid speculation that the former presidential candidate could be handed control of U.S. health audiences.
That's really what it's about.
He's going after the U.S. health audiences.
Nevertheless, advisors To the president-elect questioned whether Mr.
Kennedy a vaccine skeptic who has also been the subject of a series of bizarre stories involving animals.
You see this?
First of all, it's advisors.
Anonymous advisors.
We don't know who they are.
How many advisors has he got in his campaign?
Not that many.
And then they immediately transition into this smear.
What a ridiculous thing.
We've seen him criticized because of his anti-vaccine status.
And again, he says, I'm not anti-vaccine.
I've taken all the vaccines, given them all to my kids, and all that kind of stuff, right?
I just want to have safe vaccines.
Well, whatever.
They've usually smeared him as an anti-vaccine person, which I take as a credit, by the way.
Thank you very much for calling me anti-vaccine.
I wear that proudly, along with the conspiracy theorist label.
Proud of both of those things.
So you're not going to intimidate me with either of those things.
You're so gullible you don't ever think that anybody is colluding.
Do you realize that virtually every criminal case in the United States has got conspiracies attached to everything?
Anyway, so they usually come after him for a lot of other things.
Then I come after him for his personal life.
A lot of things there.
But instead, they came after him Yeah, first of all, this is another indication of where it's coming from in the Trump campaign.
If you start talking about his connections, you know, his sexual liaisons and his promiscuity and all the rest of the stuff, you don't want to throw that kind of stone in the Trump glass White House, right?
But instead, they go to this crazy stuff about animals.
You know, he had the story where he saw a bear that was dead on the side of the road and he picked it up and he left it in the park as a practical joke or something like that.
And they got a picture of him holding up a carcass and say, look, he was in South Korea eating dogs.
This is the level of smear.
This is absurd personal attacks.
So this is somebody who's really got a vendetta against him.
Mr.
Kennedy had previously said Trump had promised him control of the Department of HHS, and which, this is a UK paper, they say, and public agencies like the FDA, which is, of course, under the HHS. There is disquiet in the Trump team about media attention on the former independent candidate after he was pressed in a post-election interview with NBC about his vaccine skepticism.
I think there's a couple of things going on here.
First of all, the person, I think, you know, we'll talk about the Big Pharma connections of Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles.
She was a lobbyist for Big Pharma, big-time lobbyist for them.
I think there's also an element of, from her perspective, you don't want to have somebody drawing attention away from Trump, right?
And RFK Jr.
was there to assuage MAGA that Trump really wasn't a bad guy on the vaccines, even though he is.
He's the father of the vaccine.
He's very proud of it.
He's continued to lie for the last several years about it.
I saved millions of people.
It was going to be like the 1918 flu and all the rest of this stuff.
And so it was very important for him to throw something out there that the MAGA people could look at and lie to themselves and believe the lie that Trump is going to do something about vaccines.
But now that he's won, RFK Jr.
is a liability.
He's far more detailed and correct on most of these issues than Trump is.
And by comparison, when you look at the stuff that RFK Jr.
is saying, and I've got a great clip on We talked about how China took over the pork industry here in America.
And so he's speaking some very powerful truths and that removes attention away from Donald Trump.
It's the same kind of thing that happened in the first Trump administration.
If you remember, Steve Bannon was the glory hound and all that stuff, right?
Steve Bannon was making everything about him.
They don't want that to happen again.
Even to the extent that everybody was making fun of it, even Saturday Night Live was doing skits about Bannon being in charge and Bannon being the guy that's all about that.
And you also see in this time around how incredibly naive Trump was in terms of having two chief of staffs.
That was what he did in 2017, if you remember that.
There were co-chiefs of staff, Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus.
It was a political hack.
So he brings in Steve Bannon to assuage his base, and he brings in Priebus to assuage the political side of the GOP, the more establishment people.
And, of course, you can't have two heads of anything.
This whole thing, he did it again with the RNC with his daughter-in-law and the guy that was there.
But you can't effectively have two heads of anything.
God didn't make any two-headed creatures for good reason.
And so he was doomed to failure, and he got rid of Bannon because Bannon was attracting too much attention.
And I think that's one aspect of this as well as the pharmaceutical connections.
Nevertheless, we can try to read the tea leaves that are there.
The reality is that Kennedy said he would seek to fix the huge deficits in vaccine safety, but clarified, we're not going to take vaccines away from anybody.
You see, he's not anti-vaccine.
He opposes some of the additives and some other things and perhaps the number of them and the frequency of which they're being done.
All those would be good things to stop, by the way.
But it's far worse than that.
Far worse than that.
It's a step, you know, we could take a baby step in the right direction.
But that isn't going to happen, I think.
Kennedy's also said he plans to remove fluoride from drinking water.
Again, that's a local issue.
It's a local issue.
We have the EPA and the CDC pressuring people to do it, but nobody has to do it.
If you pressure your local people, they don't have to put that in the water, as I said before.
37 states leave that decision.
To your local county commissioner, city council, whatever.
They don't even take that responsibility at state level.
Now, 13 of them do, and the District of Columbia.
But just because the EPA and the CDC and the dentist are lying to you about fluoride doesn't mean that you have to drink it, right?
You don't have to believe their lies, you don't have to drink their lies either.
Trump's campaign is now questioning whether Kennedy could get confirmed for a cabinet level position by the Senate, whether he could obtain security clearance, or even if he wanted to go through these processes.
In August, Kennedy admitted that he'd found a dead bear cub and dumped it in Central Park in 2014, leaving a bicycle at the scene to make it look like an accident.
And then they go into more stuff.
He was also accused of sawing the head off a dead whale to strap it to the roof of his car.
So what if he dead?
It's a dead whale.
People do stuff like that all the time.
Have you ever seen something?
They have these places called taxidermy places.
People saw off the heads of animals and put them on their walls.
What difference would that make, even if it was true?
You see, somebody here is beating a dead horse.
All of these so-called, look at this, the animal, because we know that if you want to, one of the few taboos left in our society is harming animals.
Isn't that right?
That's one of the reasons why peanut got so big, right?
You can do anything you want to to a human baby.
You can kill tens of millions of people with your vaccines, but don't you abuse an animal.
And look, I'm not saying that animal abuse doesn't matter.
It does.
It's just that we have more of an attachment for animals than we do our own kind, than we do our own children.
And so this is why you can pull that on somebody.
He told MSNBC, he says, in some categories, entire departments, like the nutrition department and the FDA, have to go.
So, are we going to have the Constitution?
Are we going to have some kind of weak pragmatism?
You talk about rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
I think the nutrition department from the FDA has got to go.
The FDA's gotta go.
The CDC's gotta go.
The NIH has gotta go.
And the entire organization, HHS, has gotta go.
They're all folded under.
They all gotta go.
But he says, why do we have Froot Loops in the country, in this country, that have 18 or 19 ingredients, and then you go to Canada, and it's got two or three ingredients?
And by the way, I don't know who does their spell-checking at The Telegraph.
They spelled fruit, F-R-O-O-T, We are in an idiocracy, if ever there was one.
He added that he could not eliminate public health agencies altogether, he said, without congressional approval.
There you go.
Oh, well, that would be like Mike Johnson.
I really hope that the GOP does get the House, and everything has changed.
I said the day after the election, I said, well, you know, the GOP's got a big lead, but if you look at all these different places where they're fighting, I said, I really think that's, if they can manipulate the election, they'll do it with that.
And I said, there's a lot of areas that are very, very blue, and they're fighting really hard to keep those votes from being totaled up and everything.
So, and they still had it as, like I said, before the election, just before the election, the pollsters were We're saying that there was like a 66 to 70% chance the Senate would go GOP and about the same 66 to 70% chance that the House would go Democrat.
So I said, well, I haven't seen anything to change that.
It looks like it's changed now.
And now they have said, well, now it looks like there's a 90% chance that the GOP is going to get the House.
So, and they're really, they're getting very close.
Who knows?
We won't know till the very, very end of it.
But isn't it interesting that here we are, nearly a week after the election, and they can't count those votes.
And some of them that I've looked at, when you look at the, and I know that they're calculating, well, you know, we haven't gotten the votes from the Democrat areas yet.
Why not?
You just call them up and say, you know, it's been a week.
Can you give us that TPS report, please?
Yeah.
Yeah, could you do that anytime soon?
Where'd you do that?
Okay.
Why are they holding the results for a week in these Democrat areas?
But I mean, you look at some of these races, and you can go on some of the websites, you can see the areas that haven't been called, and you can mouse over them.
And it'll tell you what percentage of votes have been tallied and reported, and it'll tell you where the two candidates are, you know, percentage-wise.
And some of them, they're up like 80%, and you've got a big lead for the Republican, they still won't call it.
I guess they're waiting to see how many ballots the Democrats can stuff in there.
Who knows?
It's kind of like a game of poker.
Show me your hand first.
Oh, I need another ace.
I got it up my sleeve here.
So...
So there's a big scramble going on for cabinet places, and again, personnel is policy.
And so it is interesting to look at this.
It's not just a Game of Thrones.
It's not just people jogging for position in Washington.
It really is going to be policy that is there.
Tom Cotton, the Arkansas senator, reportedly ruled himself out of contention as CIA director or defense secretary.
Well, that's good.
He's absolutely awful on every issue.
And this is, again, to show you how up-to-date the UK Telegraph is and all this stuff.
They said Mike Pompeo could return in his old role.
That's gone down in flames since then.
They don't have any insider knowledge with any of this stuff.
But they do have somebody that is leaking to them in the campaign about RFK Jr.
Sources close to Trump have said that he wants to staff his national security team with businessmen and chief executives rather than generals and bankers like the first time.
Except a lot of these businessmen will be bankers as well.
You know they will be.
They'll be technocrats this time around.
A lot of Silicon Valley guys instead of Goldman Sachs bankers and five-star generals.
Mr.
Trump also clashed with his first Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, former Chief Executive of Exxon, who privately referred to Trump as an effing moron.
By the way...
I gotta say, I drew the ire of Alex Jones for tweeting at him and Trump in the transition period of 2017 when I still had reach on Twitter.
And I said, this Rex Tillerson guy Is awful.
So there's been rumors that he's going to be Secretary of State.
Shut this thing down.
Do some investigation of this guy's background.
Do you realize that when he was at Exxon, he was all about the green agenda and had all these people saying, you're an idiot.
You don't know.
You don't know that he's on board with the green agenda.
He was a CEO at Exxon Mobile.
It's like, yeah, well, look at what they did.
And look at what he did after he got in.
He was the one, along with Ivanka, pushing to keep us into the Paris Climate Accord, which we never got into legally.
And so there was a fight then between Scott Pruitt and the EPA and Rex Tillerson to try to keep us into the Paris Climate Accord.
He also had this little thing going about turning the Boy Scouts homosexuals.
You know, and not just the Boy Scouts, but also the Scout leaders taking the little boys out into the woods.
I had a big problem with that as well.
But, you know, hey, we don't have to worry about that as long as it's Republicans.
Republicans can do whatever they want.
And we don't ever call them out on it, do we?
Elon Musk has been praised as a new star and amazing guy by Trump on Tuesday, expected to be handed a key administration role.
They said, again, Telegraph is out of touch.
He's not going to get an administration role.
He's not going to get a cabinet position.
He's been saying that for quite some time.
But he, nevertheless, is going to have tremendous influence, and we'll talk about what we're already seeing with it.
Republicans currently have 52 seats in the Senate.
We've got two, let's see, a majority of two, which could rise to four when races in Pennsylvania and Nevada are called.
As a matter of fact, the one in Pennsylvania has already been called for McCormick, although the Democrat Casey says he's going to contest it.
McCormick is ahead by, you know, like 30,000 or something like that.
The guy who did not get Trump's pick, instead Trump picked Dr.
Oz.
So they wound up getting Fetterman.
And I've seen people in Pennsylvania who go, can you believe this?
We've got a choice between Fetterman and Dr.
Oz.
But not to say that McCormick's good.
McCormick is a typical establishment guy.
You know, multi-millionaire, billionaire businessman who is not going to be on our side at all.
But he's got an R behind his name, so we should feel good about that, right?
Well, let's talk a little bit about Susie Wiles.
There's an excellent three articles on Health Impact News from Brian Shulhavi, and he contacted a really good friend of this broadcast who has contacted him in the past about this program and things, so um uh and he passed it on to me and um trump announces a former big pharma lobbyist to run the white house and look at that org chart there
scroll that up a little bit karen um there she is in the upper right hand corner and we got trump on the right and biden on the left and in the middle is mercury public affairs and mercury public affairs has got a lot of connections to look at that gilead uh gabby gates's um organization monsanto pfizer novavax johnson and johnson the un foundation all the usual suspects
Yes.
She's done work for all of them.
Isn't that nice?
And what's also interesting is, if you look down there in the lower right-hand corner, it says the Kennedy Beacon.
This graphic was put together by a substack that was a heavy supporter of RFK Jr.
And back in April, the Kennedy Beacon put this up and told the truth about Susie Wiles.
They have now removed that page.
The Kennedy Beacon has.
And if you go to the Kennedy Beacon and you look, it's all Trump news, Trump news, Trump news all the time everywhere.
They now become Trump cheerleaders.
They've been absorbed into the Borg.
They've become one of the body, Landrieu.
Anyway, they've now removed that page.
It's no longer there.
But Brian Shulhavi was able to find it in archives.
And that's another story.
You know, the attacks that have happened running up to the election on the Internet Archive.
And we will cover a little bit of that later as well.
But the Chief of Staff is a position that does not have to be approved by the Senate.
And so this is somebody that is completely Trump's pick.
And so let's give a little bit of a background to Susie Wiles.
As I pointed out, and the only thing I said about her when she came up before, I said, well, I thought it was kind of interesting.
She was Pat Summerhall's daughter, the football player and longtime sports commentator.
And I knew that there was bad blood between her and DeSantis.
But let's take a quick look at the timeline here.
2016, she ran Trump's campaign in Florida.
And then in 2018, as Ron DeSantis was running for governor, Trump was supportive, and he encouraged DeSantis to bring on Susie Wiles to run his campaign.
And she did.
It was credited for turning around his campaign, her work that she did.
She seems to be very good at what she does.
But then something happened, and there was bad blood, and they split.
I don't know exactly the details of that.
Of course, you probably won't be able to get the truth about that one way or the other.
But so after that campaign, they were at odds with each other.
Then in 2020...
DeSantis convinced Trump to fire her when he was running in his failed re-election campaign in 2020.
Now it gets really bad.
And so then in 2021, after January the 6th and that debacle, you know, the 2020 campaign and all the rest of the stuff, and then January 6th, Trump brought her back.
Knew she was confident.
And so she's been his campaign advisor, key personnel.
She stays in the background, unlike Steve Bannon, who always puts himself up front, grandizing himself, glory hound.
But she stays in the background, very professional in terms of organizing things, smart about that.
So he's brought her back.
She's been there now for three years with him.
But while she was also running his campaign, in December of 2022, she joined that group we just showed you the org chart of, Mercury Public Affairs, this lobbying group.
And that was pretty recent.
That was December of 2022 she joined with him.
And as a matter of fact, she's still there.
And what is interesting, what I really do find interesting is that as people started talking about her over the weekend, as people started talking about her connections to big pharmaceutical companies, especially to Gates and Gavi, This page disappeared.
So if you go to Mercury Public Affairs and you look for Suzy Wiles, or if you Google it, if you go to Google and you type in Suzy Wiles Mercury Public Affairs, it pulls up a page.
You click on that link and you get a 404 page not found.
It's like, oh, well, that's interesting.
So I took that and I put it into one of the Internet Archive programs.
And this was last backed up on Friday, November the 8th.
And so sometime between Friday and today, Mercury has deleted that page about Susie Wiles.
And as of Friday, that page says that Susie Wiles is with them.
She's co-chair.
She's on the board.
And she's co-chair on the board.
So she is still with a pharmaceutical, a company that lobbies for pharmaceutical companies and Bill Gates and all the rest of the stuff, while she's going to be the chief of staff of Donald Trump.
Do you find that interesting?
I do.
One of the other things that is interesting is that as we move ahead and we talk about personnel, of course, in anticipation of control of the Senate, which they know they've already got, there is discussion about who's going to replace Mitch McConnell.
Now, Mitch McConnell is going to hang around for another couple of years.
He's frozen in place.
Literally, I guess.
He's had some real health issues, and he's old, but he's not, these people, not ready to step down.
He did say he would step down from being the leader of the Republicans, and now that would be a majority leader.
And so you've got a battle going on between three people, John Cornyn, Thune in South Dakota, who I don't know anything about.
I think he's pretty much a typical establishment Republican.
And then you've got Rick Scott out of Florida.
Well, I do know Cornyn.
That guy is awful.
As a matter of fact, whenever I think of Cornyn anymore, I think of that photo op where Trump has brought in a bunch of people from the Senate, and they're talking about how they can screw us over on the Second Amendment.
The famous thing, well, just take the gun and do the due process later.
Fortunately, I don't have to bother you with getting rid of the bump stocks.
I can do that myself, fortunately.
It's like, when he did the executive order for gun control.
But at that disgusting display of ignorance and tyranny that Trump was putting on there, You had, sitting on his, I think it was on his left, was Dianne Feinstein.
She's like, all giggly.
She's so excited in anticipation of what they're going to do.
And on his right is John Cornyn, who's nodding his head in approval.
The Texas senator.
Yeah, yeah, we can get rid of this.
We can get rid of that.
We can eviscerate the Second Amendment.
That kind of gets you an idea of where John Cornyn is.
Now, Rick Scott, again, I don't know much about Rick Scott or Thune.
I do know about Cornyn, and I'm sure there's nothing that we're going to be happy with any of these people.
However, Rick Scott was somebody that Susie Wiles was a campaign advisor for.
In Florida.
So I would say that he's got the inside on this.
Now, that is a position that, you know, they're going to have to get the approval of the other Republicans in the Senate to do that.
And that lobbying has already started.
I think it's pretty clear that Susie Wiles would prefer Rick Scott that she used to work for as well.
And so we'll see what happens with it.
Again, as Brian Shalabi points out, she worked as a lobbyist for some of the largest manufacturers of vaccines, including Pfizer.
She has been called by Politico and many others the most powerful and feared woman and least known political operative in America.
That was a profile that was run earlier this year from Politico on her.
They say she speaks on the record hardly ever.
And she speaks about herself even less.
She's not just one of Trump's senior advisors.
She's the most important advisor.
She's been, in essence, his chief of staff for the last more than three years.
Again, going back to 2021, after January 6th.
She's one of the reasons that Trump is the GOP's presumptive nominee and Ron DeSantis is not.
And she's also one of the reasons for the virulent attacks on Ron DeSantis.
It wasn't just that he was ahead in the polls after the 2022 election, but it was also because she had a personal vendetta with him.
She's the leading reason that Trump has every chance to get elected again.
There is nobody, I think, that has a wealth of information that she does.
Nobody in our orbit.
Nobody.
It's a top Trump pollster.
She touches everything.
Yeah, it seems like she does.
Yeah, she seems like she does touch everything, doesn't she?
Especially the pharmaceutical stuff.
And so again, going back to the Kennedy Beacon, which has now removed that page that I showed you there and archived it.
He said at the time, before he removed that page, that had the graphic on it.
And again, Brian Shulhavi was able to go back and get the archive there.
It's funny how all this information about Susie Wilds is just disappearing everywhere, all over the internet.
It's funny how there's this concerted effort from, I think, both Republicans and Democrats to memory hole the internet.
You always say, well, you know, the internet is going to remember what people said, even though they think you don't.
They don't like that.
They want to get rid of that.
Anyway, the time Kennedy Beacon, when they were, and again, all this stuff goes back to April.
Kennedy Beacon, at that time, said Susie Wiles is a lobbyist for Big Pharma.
She's also a key advisor to Trump.
That's a problem, they said.
But not anymore.
Now it's a problem that Kennedy Beacon has purged all this stuff.
On April 26th, former President Trump revisited one of his most controversial pet projects, Operation Warp Speed.
This time, he dragged his political opponent, RFK Jr., into the fray.
His views on vaccines are fake, all uppercase, as is everything else about his candidacy.
He posted that up on Truth Social.
His views on vaccines are fake.
And yet it is those views on vaccines that Trump used RFK Jr.
for to assuage the fears of the MAGA people who really do know what Trump is doing, what he's about in terms of vaccines.
They just won't admit it to themselves or to you.
Going back to the Kennedy Beacon, this ignited significant backlash from Trump's base Highlighting the extent to which they disagree with him on COVID-19 vaccines.
So he learned his lesson.
Maybe she learned his lesson.
We'll make an alliance with him.
And then we will bide our time!
Wicked Witch of South Florida, I guess we could say.
And so, Kennedy Beacon had a hat up, making fun of MAGA. Said, make Big Pharma rich again.
That's now been removed.
Because now they're wearing the original red hat.
Make America great again.
They continued.
Wiles is also a seasoned lobbyist.
Her LinkedIn profile summarizes her leadership roles at multiple corporate and political lobbying firms since the mid-1980s, allowing her to sway Trump's psyche with her conflicts of interest.
She became co-chair of lobbying firm Mercury Public Affairs in February of 2022.
Well, that's a little bit earlier than what I saw.
I saw December of 2022.
Maybe that was a different post that she got elevated to in December.
Mercury's clientele, but still, she was still working for Trump and had been working for him for over a year.
Mercury's clientele includes Pfizer, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance of Bill Gates.
The UN Foundation is another Mercury client.
And Gilead Sciences.
They created remdesivir.
Boy, they seem to be really politically connected, you know, to Rand Paul, to Fauci, to all these different people.
Gilead Pharmaceutical.
Going back to Brian Shalhavi, he says, so what does it say about RFK Jr.'s chances of having any kind of real authority to do what he's claiming he's going to do?
When Trump himself called his views on vaccines as fake just a few months ago, right?
Yeah, we're talking seven months ago.
And then within a couple of months, he's using RFK Jr.
to get himself elected.
The Substack page called Holistic News also did a piece on Suzy Wiles.
They said Trump's Save America PAC chair is Suzy Wiles, who has significant ties to Big Pharma and to Gabby, the Vaccine Alliance.
In a recent statement on True Social, Trump expressed a preference for Biden over even RFK Jr., When he criticized RFK Jr.
on his fake vaccine.
Trump had previously tweeted about a link between vaccines and autism back in 2014.
And again, that's why I say, you know, it's the same game that we saw going around the first time.
You know, he uses Alex Jones and he uses some tweets about autism to magnify the fact that he is a vaccine skeptic, and he used RFK Jr.
at the same time as a vaccine skeptic.
Then in 2017, in the transition period, he brings RFK Jr.
to Trump Tower.
He does a media interview that's live, and then lo and behold, within a short period of time, a couple of days or a week or whatever, RFK Jr.
never hears from him again.
But Trump gets massive donations from these pharmaceutical companies.
Pfizer alone gave him a million dollars.
And then the rest is history.
He put a big pharma CEO from Eli Lilly, Alex Azar, in as head of HHS. He was bidding his price up.
First of all, he was pulling the leg of his voters.
And then he used RFK Jr.
to bid his price up to big pharmaceutical companies, and he sold out.
Trump had previously tweeted about a link between vaccines and autism back in 2014.
Many were wondering what had changed his mind about vaccine safety.
Now he says that RFK Jr.'s views on vaccines are fake.
No, Trump is fake.
Trump is fake and his lies about vaccines are fake.
His pandemic was fake.
His vaccine was poison.
He's killed tens of millions of people worldwide.
Tom Ritz, a Trump supporter, has raised concern about the influence.
The campaign leader, Susie Wiles, a key figure behind the scenes in Trump's campaign.
Again, this is back in April.
Mercury, the company representing major pharmaceutical companies, Pfizer, Gilead, Gavi, the UN, all this stuff, right?
And so Brian Shalhavi says, so sorry to disappoint all you Trump believers who foolishly thought Trump would correct all the wrongs he made in his first administration when he killed millions of people as he pressured the FDA to approve his experimental quote-unquote vaccines.
Kennedy will never have any meaningful position in his administration that can affect any change, but Trump has to pay him back for his support.
So expect the Wall Street billionaires and the Silicon Valley billionaires to keep funding Kennedy's Children's Health Defense Organization, where I'm sure it will now become the largest alternative health website in the world.
And I think we've got a bit of a harbinger with that.
I played, because I thought it was interesting, there was a guy, Lutnik, who was running, I think it was his name, I'd never seen him before, but he was on with Caitlin.
I can't remember her name either.
But anyway, I played that clip last week, and I thought it was interesting because as soon as he starts throwing some shade at the official vaccine narrative, she hops on him, and she doesn't have anything.
She has nothing to put out there.
But, you know, she did not want to let him talk.
And what he was saying was that RFK Jr.
told him, and he's part of the transition team, he said, just give me a half hour, let me talk to you about vaccines.
He said he made some very convincing arguments about safety issues with vaccines and things like that.
But she kept pressing him.
Is he going to be head of HHS? Is he going to be head of HHS? And finally he says, no, he's not.
We'll give him some data.
That's what he said.
And so, by giving him data, that is the way they can make children's health defense even bigger.
Now look, children's health defense does some good work.
And I think I talk about their articles frequently.
He has also made a tremendous amount of money there, as Michael Harvey points out.
He said the revenue coming into children's health defenses more than doubled each year of their existence.
In 2018, they brought in a million.
2019, it was three million.
In 2020, It was $6.7 million.
And then, let's see, I'm sorry, 2019 it was $6.7 million.
2020, it went up to $16 million.
And it's continuing to climb.
Now, if he becomes the, you know, having this data given to him would be very, very lucrative.
As he points out, you know, even if he were to be put into government, he already makes half a million dollars.
And that's way more than Fauci, who somehow made more than he was allowed under law.
More than twice what he was allowed under law.
You know, Fauci's, the salary of all of the people in the swamp, okay, all of the executive branch people, that means that, you know, whether you're head of HHS or the lower levels underneath it, head of NIH or whatever, or NIAID, where Fauci was.
So you have HHS, you have NIH, and then under that, you have Fauci's organization, NIAID. He made more than his boss at NIH, Francis Collins.
He made more than his boss at HHS, Alex Azar.
And he made more than the president, which is not allowed under law.
The salary of all those people, It's supposed to be capped at the salary of the vice president, which is just over $200,000.
But Fauci somehow made more than all of them.
It's like double dipping, and I've said in the past.
So is he also a CIA employee?
Is he drawing a CIA salary as well as his own NIAID? Because he's worked hand in glove.
With the CIA in terms of running these germ games and stuff like that.
But, you know, just his salary was in total open defiance of the law.
And they paid it to him.
No explanation ever given.
And that doesn't count all the royalties that he got for intellectual property that was being kicked back to them.
You know, we know there's millions that were being kicked back to NIH people.
But they didn't tell us who.
They redacted who was actually getting the money.
So, anyway, it would be a cut in salary for RFK Jr.
to take a position in government.
But if they give him the data and he goes back to children's health defense, it'll get even bigger than it ever was.
So it's a win for him personally, although we don't really expect to see anything being done in government.
Now, there was also another article from Health Impact News.
Where he talks about an interview that Alex did at Infowars, Alex Jones at Infowars, did with Tom Rents at about the same time.
So you see there's at least two substacks that were there.
The Kennedy substack that was promoting him has scrubbed it.
There was another one, Holistic.
And then Tom Rents was exposing Susie Wiles, the chief of staff.
And that video, that interview that Alex Jones did, that's now been, as Brian Shalhavi points out, that's now been banned from Banned.Video, which is Alex Jones' video platform that he keeps.
So he says, after publishing yesterday's article showing how MAGA Trump supporters who previously exposed Susie Wiles as a Big Pharma pro-vaccine lobbyist while she was his campaign manager, and now they are deleting some of their previous exposure of Susie Wiles.
Ties to the Deep State, because she's now Trump's chief of staff.
One of our readers alerted me to a much longer video of Tom Rents being interviewed by Alex Jones about how Susie Wiles was corrupt.
However, that video was apparently filmed in April this year.
Again, all this stuff was happening in April.
And it's now disappeared from Infowars' website.
You can't find it.
And so he takes screenshots of where he was searching for it, and he couldn't find it.
He continued to search for it.
He found it on Odyssey because they put their stuff up on all these different websites.
So he found a copy of it on Odyssey, and Brian Shulhavi has now put that on his website so that you can see what was said.
But it's essentially the same stuff.
And Tom Rents at the time said, well, if you're looking for my interview about Trump's campaign manager and PAC leader, Susie Wiles, it's being pulled down everywhere.
He said this in April.
I'm not sure what's happening, but apparently the WEF is pretty upset about this, about finding out that someone that might be compromised is so close to Trump.
At this point, it had been for over three years.
And as a matter of fact, even going back to 2016, she was connected with the Trump campaign.
Had a big presence in 2016.
Trump is recommending her to DeSantis, gets her in there in 2018, hires her again in 2020, fires her because of DeSantis' pressure, then brings her back in 2021, makes her head of the campaign and all the rest of this stuff.
He knew about all that.
And so, interesting that Tom Rents would say that the World Economic Forum is upset about this.
You know, Kissinger's errand boy, Steve Pachenik, was getting everybody upset about January the 6th and Stop the Steal stuff four years ago.
But again, this was all back in April, April 25th, 2024.
Now InfoWars has deleted this, and Tom Rents is quiet about that.
He would not respond to Brian Shalhavi when he asked him.
So is Tom Rents also trying to push away that he said anything bad about Susie Wiles?
Just like the people who were doing the RFK Jr.
thing?
Is that what we can expect?
So...
Brian Chalhavi says, well, he exposed her back in April, and others, like Dr.
Peter McCullough, could not get a meeting with Trump because of Susie Wiles, he said in the interview.
He said she's blocking Peter McCullough from talking to Donald Trump, doesn't want to be seen with Peter McCullough on the advice of Susie Wiles, the pharmaceutical lobbyist.
And he said that's why you can't tell the difference between Mike Johnson and Adam Schiff.
Yeah, you see, if you want to get rid of the FDA, or if you want to get rid of even any departments within the FDA, the person you need to call is Mike Johnson, not RFK Jr.
You see how this misdirection works?
Congress funds this garbage.
And the way this garbage gets funded is because people like Mike Johnson have followed along with a path that was blazed by Nancy Pelosi where you bring in these omnibus bills and you put them in at the last minute.
And you put everything in the world.
That's why they call it omnibus.
Everything in the world is in there.
So it's like, take everything or leave everything.
You can't go in and say you're not allowed to have rules to have an objection to a particular thing.
That's one of the things that those few people in the House GOP fought with Kevin McCarthy for.
Because everything was all tied up and delivered in a sealed box, essentially.
As leadership worked on these things in the back rooms and the people on the floor had no ability to push back against any of this stuff when it was presented.
It was a take it or leave it.
Take all of it or leave all of it type of thing.
And so if that's the situation, and it is, with Mike Johnson, you will never have any change as long as Mike Johnson is there.
From a practical standpoint, it doesn't matter whether Mike Johnson is there or Hakeem Jeffries is there.
It really doesn't, folks.
And you're fooling yourself if you think there's a difference between these two guys.
And so, the difference is that people think that Mike Johnson is on their side, which makes it even worse.
He's not going to do anything to change these rules.
He's not going to do anything to cut any of these things.
He's not even going to get rid of a department at FDA. He's not going to defund anything.
Rince also said at the time in the interview, you're not going to buy Trump off because he's not for sale, but you can buy his advisors.
Well, I would heartily agree with that.
I disagree with that, I should say.
Trump is for sale.
He is absolutely for sale.
They bought him in the transition period, and we saw that.
And then he said, I doubt that Trump even knew what was going on.
And then Alex Jones jumps in and says, of course he didn't.
I am so sick and tired of the guy who is the mastermind playing 4D chess.
And at the same time, they want you to hold this doublethink, this Orwellian doublethink, and believe that although he's the 4D chess master, he doesn't know who he's appointed.
And these people are just pulling the wool over his eyes.
He was just completely bamboozled by the deep state.
And I want to thank Brian for linking some of the stuff that I said about what was going on with the vaccines and January the 6th entrapment.
He links that in the article as well.
He was trying to warn people about this stuff, and he had a video going back to December.
So Brian Shalhavi says, who are all the MAGA people now who warned everyone about Susie Wiles earlier this year, right after Trump attacked RFK Jr.?
That's what predicated all this stuff in April, right?
So there's the attack, and then the people respond to that.
The Kennedy Beacon and Holistic and Tom Rents, they all respond to that attack.
And so then they changed tactics, and what they do is they bring RFK Jr.
on board.
Such cynical Machiavellian manipulation.
It's Machiavellian America again.
If he's truly as ignorant as you MAGA people claim he is, says Brangel Javi, then why did you put him back in the White House?
And he says, I checked Tom Ritz's Substack page, but he has not addressed this issue yet.
I've reached out to him before publishing this article and asked him to comment, but he didn't respond, so is he running from it now?
I don't know.
And Brian has in there, yeah, right there, that picture there.
Show that.
You know, who will dare to defy King Trump?
He's got a picture there of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refusing to worship the idol of Nebuchadnezzar.
You know, it's funny, too, because I referred to Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego When I was talking about the Trump lockdowns in 2020, spring.
So what's the matter with these people?
You know, they shut everything down.
They let the federal government define what religious expressions are going to be.
So what's the matter with that?
Are they that afraid of the consequences?
They need to do what's right and leave the consequences to God.
That's the lesson of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.
And so, he says, Trump supporters are in panic mode.
This is the third article.
He did three articles about this, and it is key.
He said, let the censorship and revision of history begin.
And that's exactly what we've seen with all these pages.
Being taken away.
And even to the extent that Mercury has now taken down the page about Susie Wiles.
He found one, the Kennedy beacon.
He said he traced it back to a guy who actually is doing work there, Louis Conte.
He describes himself, he says, I am a polygraph examiner.
Lie detector.
Physician, heal thyself.
What happens if a polygraph examiner examines himself?
Well, same thing happens when he examines other people.
Nothing.
Karen used to work for a convenience store chain.
She was district personnel manager.
So there's a lot of stores underneath her.
And whenever they would have theft...
Or a lot of money that was missing out of the register.
They would pull everybody in and they'd polygraph them.
And they all knew that it didn't do any good.
It was simply intimidation.
And they could get people to confess because, oh, you're going to know that I told a lot.
It's just a bluff.
But it worked.
It's a bluff.
But here's this guy who is a polygraph guy, and he has decided he's going to lie to you about Trump and about all the rest of this stuff.
He says, Brian Shalabi says, That would potentially pale in comparison to the censorship we saw under Trump's first presidency when all dangers and reports of how bad Trump's vaccines, quote unquote, were being reported, all that quickly disappeared on social media sites and were heavily censored.
But now we have people are so, have attached themselves to Trump's coattails so much that they will engage in self-censorship.
And this is always the goal of totalitarianism, right?
To get you to live by lies.
To get you to censor yourself.
Out of fear.
Out of fear that your audience is going to desert you.
And so that's the question.
Where are we right now?
We know where Alex is.
Alex is, you know, he loves Trump, he loves Trump not.
He loves Trump, he loves Trump not.
We've seen it go back and forth.
He'll rail against Trump, and then he'll rail for Trump and against Trump's enemies.
He's been on board with RFK Jr.
He's been on board with DeSantis.
And you've seen the foul-mouthed rants that have been leaked to people publicly.
I've seen them privately.
He hates Trump.
He absolutely, positively despises Trump.
And yet he's one of Trump's biggest cheerleaders.
It's that kind of hypocrisy that really disgusts me about this business.
I really hate the news business.
And I hate politics.
So, Brian Shihavi ends up by saying, we will not forget what Trump and his cronies did four years ago.
I never will.
And it wasn't just Trump and his cronies.
And if you want to include the cronies, that also includes the Democrats.
Democrats, of course, are in on all of this stuff.
Just like the Republicans.
Just that everybody knows what the Democrats are up to and nobody seems to want to remember or look at what the Republicans are up to.
It kind of reminds me of the times we used to see, you know, the enemies, you know, the Bushes and the Clintons and everything.
And then you see, you know, George W. palling around with Bill Clinton.
Best buddies all over the place.
And it's just disgusting.
It's such phony garbage.
Well, I've gone for quite some time here, so I'm going to take a break.
I'm not finished with this because I want to talk about some of the other things, some of the other personnel that show us the policy that is coming from the soon-to-be Trump administration.
Comments, Brian and Deb McCartney, RFK never said he would abolish anything.
Just reorganize.
That's right.
And, you know, it is rearranging the chairs on the Titanic as far as I'm concerned.
But really, the abolishing needs to come.
RFK Jr.
couldn't do that.
And if he was appointed head of an organization, he could shut it down.
you actually had howard phillips who had had uh he was affiliated with the constitution party created the taxpayer party he ran for president as a third party independent and everything but he was actually appointed by reagan uh over some department i forget what it is and he was and remains the only person to shut down his own department so whatever else he did you got to
You know, I mean, again, I'm not signing on to anybody.
I'm just saying, take one issue at a time.
That was wonderful.
It was heroic.
But this type of stuff really does need to come from Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House.
And yet he has adopted the Pelosi tactic that was, remember, we saw that, I think the first time we saw it in a big, big way, was with Obamacare.
Well, we just got to pass it so we can find out what's in it, she said.
And what she meant by that was we're going to create this agenda.
We're going to kick it over to the bureaucracy, and then they're going to tell us what's in it.
They're going to put all the devilish details into it.
And so she was actually telling the truth.
Everybody said, she's crazy.
No, if you don't understand how Washington, and now that whole thing works, you're the crazy one.
She was telling people the truth.
That was some major veritas she dropped on people.
We just pass it, and then we'll find out what's in it when the bureaucracy writes all the rules.
But they ran Obamacare through.
You drop this big thing in, you know, thousands of pages, and you've got, you know...
48 hours, 72 hours, take a look at it, and it's like, take it all or leave it all.
And that's now what they do with every one of the spending bills.
They wait and wait and wait.
They make speeches, they run their little investigations until the last minute, and it's like, well, we're going to run out of time, and the government's going to shut down.
We're going to have to pass this thing right away.
Oh, and here's this massive omnibus bill.
Everything in the world is in there.
And if you vote against it, oh, you're the bad person.
And Even though some of that stuff got chipped away in the fight against Kevin McCarthy, it all came back with Mike Johnson.
He's bad.
He's worse.
He's worse than Kevin McCarthy was.
Not that Kevin McCarthy didn't want to do that.
It's just that he had his hand forced.
No, we're back to John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi and everything.
That's what Mike Johnson is.
That's why I say, you know, what's going to happen with the House?
The only good thing about the House being all Republican is it removes that alibi saying, well, we can't get anything done because of Nancy Pelosi and the House.
Well, if they've got all three, it's like you own it now.
And everybody can see the hypocrisy, but of course they won't.
They won't pay any attention to it at all.
From Friday, conservative thinking.
We didn't get to these.
They came up at the last minute when I was talking to Eric.
From Friday, conservative thinking.
Thank you for the tip.
He says, when are you going to have someone from the Tenth Amendment Center back on the show?
Yeah, I need to get them back on.
It's been a while since we've talked.
Progress Retort.
Thank you for the tip.
On Friday, he says, simultaneously, they're making a mockery of DC, so we turn our backs while coming after a most efficient hyper-local government.
Yeah.
Corrupt regional government will be their solution to rule us locally.
I agree.
And that's why I've said for the longest time, I said all this stuff about getting everybody focused on Washington is a red herring to get you to not look at the local and regional stuff.
And that's where it all has to be implemented.
And we can see that if you've got some good people in at the local level, and even at the regional level, that they can block and nullify some of this stuff.
You know, we have...
Gavin Newsom is out there saying, well, I'm going to Trump-proof California.
And the conservative news organizations are, can you believe that?
I'm like, yeah, I can believe it.
That's a smart thing to do, actually.
And it's a constitutional thing to do.
We hopefully would be doing the same thing if Lala had been elected.
In Tennessee, we Biden-proofed the Second Amendment.
When he said, I'm going to ban pistol braces, you had...
Frank Nicely and others passed laws that said that we're not going to cooperate with anything from the federal government if it violates the Constitution and if it violates Tennessee law.
And, oh, by the way, we just passed a law saying that pistol braces are legal in Tennessee.
So, you know, they Biden-proofed Tennessee.
Well, I would expect some of these other places to Trump-proof their states politically.
That's the way it works.
That's a constitutional thing.
And nullification, and that's why I always talk about over and above the issues, whatever you think about the issues, whatever you think about guns or whatever you think about marijuana or whatever, the issue is, and we have shown it and the left always wants to freak out about it.
But now Gavin Newsom is doing it.
We've had people who wanted to secede from, wanted California to secede in 2017.
So I said, look, you know, let's talk about this.
That's not even, secession is not even what you have to do.
Do nullification.
Do not comply.
And we're going to nullify this.
That's the key thing.
The reason that doesn't happen is because Washington ties money to everything.
That's why they don't nullify it.
And that's what MAGA and so many conservatives don't understand, the power of the purse to bribe and to blackmail.
That's how Washington operates, and that's how Washington gets around the Tenth Amendment.
Karen Carpenter says, Good morning.
There will be many, many smears.
Don Jr.
said, RFK Jr.
can have any role he pleases in the administration.
Yeah, we'll see what happens.
We'll see what happens.
Tornator.
Let me just say this.
I don't put any credibility in what Don Jr.
says.
I don't put any credibility in what Don Sr.
says, let alone Don Jr.
So, whatever these politicians want to promise you, you better take a look at the past.
They say one thing and they do another, and of course they've always done that.
We've just never seen the level of betrayal That we saw in 2020, with the lockdowns, with the ventilator murder, with the remdesivir murders and all the rest of the stuff, paying hospitals to kill people, and then paying governments to lock us down.
I am disgusted with all that stuff.
That's even before you get to the vaccines.
Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
It says, Thune has an appalling JBS Freedom Index score of only 56, the John Burt Society.
So they look at his voting record, he only gets a 56%.
That's a pretty...
Pretty damning.
That's about what I expected.
I'd be interested to know what Rick Scott is, and I can imagine that John Cornyn is at that number or lower.
Tornator, thank you for the tip.
Good morning, David.
Never really noticed it before, but it looks like Froot Loops actually spells it as F-R-O-O-T on the box.
Well, there you go.
Okay, that's one for the UK Telegraph and one against me.
Who would have thought?
We never bought it.
We never bought it.
Karen says we never bought it for the kids.
I never saw one of the boxes.
You know, we walked past it in the grocery aisle or whatever.
So that's the way that they spell it.
Fruit Loop.
I guess they do that because there's probably not any FRUIT in it.
So they could run into it.
They could run into problems if they spelt it like real food.
It says, I had to Google it since that sounded like a crazy typo.
Yeah, well, thank you for correcting that.
I stand by our comment that we still have an idiocracy because people buy that stuff.
Marky Mark in New Jersey, thank you for the tip, says, Senator Thune is Mitch McConnell's pick.
For a majority leader.
McConnell's been grooming him for decades, becomes Senate GOP leader.
Another rhino.
Oh, I'm sure.
Yeah, filled with him.
Atomic Dog, thank you for the tip.
Help David Knight spread the truth across the fruited plains, spelled correctly, by liking the video, sharing on social media, and subscribing.
It helps.
Yes.
Thank you so much for reminding me, and I don't remind people enough, so thank you, Atomic Dog.
You're always good about doing that, and you even pay to do it.
Thank you so much for that.
Shield Your Eyes writes, sticking Biden in between Trump administrations was strategic.
I believe so.
I really do.
I said it was tag team stuff.
You know, Trump does a vaccine and then Biden rolls it out and everybody buys into it.
It's amazing.
Now you get 12 years of Trump instead of only 8.
That's great.
We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
The common man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
desires the david knight show.com well let's take a look at some of the other picks you
You know, it's kind of interesting when you, and I spent so much time on Susie Wiles, because the Chief of Staff is somebody that's going to influence all the other picks.
You know, we go back and we look at Trump's first term.
We got Steve Bannon, used to work for Goldman Sachs.
Funny how many Goldman Sachs people got in there.
You got Reince Priebus.
Funny how many rhinos got brought in with that.
And then, of course, all of these politicized generals.
The generals are just politicians.
They really are.
And we have...
I forgot what the multiple is, but it's something like 10 or 20 times the number of generals we have now than we did during World War II, the height of World War II. It's all political.
Well, we did get something to cheer about because Trump posted out on social media that he will not be having Mike Pompeo or Nikki Haley anywhere around his cabinet.
Well, we can all cheer that.
Very good to see that.
But the question is, is it because they were such a threat to the public as they were?
Or because they were disloyal to him?
I think that's the message that's coming out.
It's not that these people are bad.
It's not that I've got new policy now.
Because we're going to take a look at some of the people that he's talking about putting in.
No, the message was that you will kiss the ring.
Or you'll get kicked in the butt and kicked out of there.
He's going to find some more neocons and some other spies that you don't know about and hope that they will kiss the ring.
And no, I think this is just vengeance.
For the negative things that they've said.
Pompeo criticized him.
Nikki Haley really got him angry for running against him.
Trump's post came a half hour after Politico asked the transition team to comment on a story being prepared about Pompeo's bid being blocked by Trump Jr.
and Tucker Carlson.
Oh, there you go.
See, it's Don Trump Jr., Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk.
These are the people who are Joe Rogan.
These are the people who are going to pick personnel for you.
Be afraid.
Be very afraid.
Mike Rogers, who chairs the House Armed Services Committee.
Is a dark horse candidate to be Trump's defense chief.
So just in case you think that he wants somebody who's not a warmonger, neocon, sellout to the military-industrial complex.
No, it was simply about the fact that, because that's what Mike Rogers is.
It was simply about the fact that Pompeo wasn't loyal enough to him.
And, you know, here's another good example.
Trump's Iran hawk returns.
Brian Hook.
And this is an article that was put up by a Dutch paper.
And when I printed it out, the headline came out in Dutch.
Here you can see it in English.
He's set to restart maximum pressure against Tehran.
As they said, he served as U.S. Special Representative for Iran and advisor to Pompeo during the last two years of Trump's presidency.
So, we don't want to have a neocon warmonger puppet of the military-industrial complex.
Okay, so we won't have Pompeo, but we'll bring in Mike Rogers.
Same thing.
And we don't want to have Mike Pompeo, but we'll have the guy who is advising him on Iran to come in.
Same thing.
And so it was Pompeo and his advisors that were behind the killing of Iranian General Soleimani.
But of course, Trump is the person who is responsible, ultimately.
Still, personnel is policy.
And that will make a difference.
So they were the ones who pushed for the assassination of Soleimani, which It was essentially the vice president for practical purposes in Iran.
That approach ultimately failed to collapse the Iranian government.
Instead, it wound up escalating the hostility between Iran and the U.S. while Iran ramped up its nuclear enrichment following Trump's withdrawal from the Obama-era nuclear deal.
As the Dutch paper points out.
You see, with Trump, it's personal.
It's not policy.
It's not personnel, even.
The personnel is all about personal.
And everything that he does is about personal issues with him.
And so, to give you an example of Brian Hook...
Here he is and Iran put this video together.
They begin it with a statement by Brian Hook saying, they're just faking it.
You know, they don't have real rockets and all the rest of this stuff.
And then Iran puts together shots of them firing off rockets.
Iran has photoshopped images of missile launches to try and show an increased missile capability.
They've also photoshopped antiquated aircraft and tried to pass them off as new stealth fighter jets.
He says, our battle exercises only differ in the point that means that in the way they're directing.
He says, our exercises, real battles, and so forth.
So this is a spokesperson saying that it's just the difference in the angle of missiles that they shoot.
In a few minutes, we'll have eight medium-range missiles that we're going to shoot off.
Four long-range missiles will launch on the other side.
And so they're doing this as a photo opportunity to say, no, we've got real missiles here.
So, we've got some missile porn, I guess we could call this.
We're going to show all of our missiles, and we're going to show you these missiles as we shoot them off, because Brian Hook said we're just photoshopping this stuff.
Isn't it interesting?
You know, we got lied into the Iraq War.
We were told that Iraq had weapons that it didn't have.
And I guess, you know, history doesn't repeat itself.
It just kind of rhymes.
So now we can go to war with Iran, being told by Brian Hook that they don't actually have weapons.
So we get lied to going to war with Iraq, saying that they've got weapons that they don't have.
Now Brian Hook is telling us that weapons that Iran does have, they don't have.
And then, just announced by Trump, we have Tom Homan, that he's announced is going to be the head of ICE, Immigration Control.
And he was asked in an interview about deportation.
And again, I think that when I talked to Eric Peters on Friday, he had an article up on ericpetersautos.com saying, don't deport, defund, and these people will go home, right?
And the ones that don't go home will be working jobs, and I'm okay with that.
He's okay with that.
As long as they're not voting, they can be guest workers or something like that.
And I understand that's got a downside for people who are competing against them.
But again, there's other ways that you can respond to that kind of...
It's not an ideal situation.
There's no perfect solution to anything.
But this whole deportation thing...
Do you realize just how crazy that's going to get?
Rounding people up by force, putting them in concentration camps as a staging position, how that's going to be used by people?
How it's going to be seen by people?
The big issue, again, defund rather than deporting.
I've always said it's about the welfare magnet.
Stop giving them, paying them money to live here, to come here.
Stop giving them benefits that are superior.
To the benefits that you're even giving American citizens in the welfare state.
Stop the welfare magnet.
That's really what needs to be done.
But instead, they keep bringing them in, and Trump did not build the wall at all.
He didn't build it.
He built like a few dozen miles of it.
He repaired some of the wall.
But if he'd built a wall, it wouldn't have been this immediate...
You can just critically understand that for the people who want to define that.
You wouldn't have had Steve Bannon out there defrauding Trump supporters and telling them, all right, Trump's not going to build the wall.
Give us money.
We'll build the wall.
And of course, he lied, too.
And he got convicted.
And he was going to go to jail.
And Trump pardoned Bannon for that lie, for ripping off people, for promising them that he was going to do what Trump would not do because Trump broke that promise.
And the whole thing was just a grift.
And so rather than stopping the welfare magnet, they want a crisis because they can use a And it's not just the Democrats that use crises.
The Republicans will use it.
They'll use it to set up some kind of a biometric surveillance thing.
I've played the clip where Trump is going full fascist, and I mean it.
Full totalitarian fascist.
We'll stop them by land, by air, by sea.
How are they going to do that?
This is going to be Republicans begging for a surveillance state, begging for government IDs.
And all you need to do is stop giving them money to come in.
And so when we look at Tom Homan, and he was asked, so what are you going to do?
Are you really going to just physically throw people out?
We have seen one estimate that says it would cost $88 billion to deport a million people a year.
I don't know if that's accurate or not.
Is that what American taxpayers should expect?
What price do you put on national security?
Is that worth it?
Is there a way to carry out mass deportation without separating families?
Of course there is.
Families can be deported together.
Yeah.
Well, I tell you, this guy has got a demeanor of a real thug.
Yeah.
Is there any limit as to what you would not do with biometric surveillance and IDs and all the rest of this?
No.
Is it worth the national security?
What price are you going to put on national security, right?
It doesn't matter what it costs us in dollars.
It doesn't matter what it costs us in liberties, folks.
They have pushed on this thing.
And again, it's a tag team thing.
You know, Biden continuing to do this, and now Trump's going to come in with a solution.
Problem solution.
And what's that solution going to be?
It's going to be people like that guy, that fascist.
And in case you don't think that Trump is fully on board with that kind of stuff, just look at when we have videos like this and you got a cop who is having, you know, he's pulled over an elderly Asian guy who doesn't speak really good English.
You can hear him on the body cam after you see what he did.
First it's silent and you see what he did.
And the guy's arguing with him, and he points his finger in his face.
He's a 70-year-old man.
He's not physically threatening the cop.
The cop grabs him and throws him on the ground, smashing his head into the concrete.
And it's just amazing.
But, you know, the reason I mention this is because we've heard stuff from Trump saying, well, it's a shame that cops can't go up to cars that they pull over with their guns drawn.
Trump wants to extend the immunity that cops have, that anybody has, working for the government, when they abuse their power, when they harm other people.
They should not be immune for things like this.
Watch this.
70-year-old man.
They're talking.
And look at that.
He just grabs him.
They're talking.
And slams him into the ground.
Slams his head into the ground.
Now you're going to hear the body cam and see it up close.
And the woman who's with him is trying to help him.
Yeah.
That's what you're supposed to do.
The way where your vehicle was located, your vehicle is not like that.
No.
Look at that.
Look at that.
Yeah.
Real threat to him, isn't he?
Well, this cop needs to be put in jail.
But Trump doesn't want him put in jail.
This whole thing could have been solved if he just could have come up to the car with his gun drawn.
He could have shot the old man first and wouldn't have gone through all this.
Yeah, I'm going to call an ambulance.
Yeah, I'm going to call.
First, I'm going to handcuff this.
Yeah, I'll call an ambulance.
Yeah, Trump supports that kind of stuff.
Trump supports people like Tom Homan.
Yeah, we'll just deport everybody.
Yeah, I don't care how much it costs, liberty or money.
I don't care what it takes.
By the way, Nikki Haley responded to Trump's announcement.
She's not welcome back in the second administration.
She de-escalated it.
She said, I was proud to work with Trump defending America at the UN. And I asked that question from the very beginning.
Why was she ever put at the UN? Just like I asked, why Rex Tillerson?
Why this person?
Why that person?
Why do we have a Goldman Sachs banker?
Everybody that he picked was awful.
And I remember talking to Roger Stone.
I've mentioned this.
I said, you know, why would he even put Nikki Haley in at the UN? Well, he had to give her something, you know, to appease her, put her at the UN, thought that she'd be out of the way.
I said, no, come on.
You can't be that.
You know, you really think that she's out of the way at the UN? It's one of the biggest bully pulpits that you can get anywhere.
Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the Musk presidency.
and the influence that Elon Musk is going to have on this administration.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
The most powerful unelected man ever.
Yeah, we know we have these nine Supreme Court justices and they exercise a great deal of power.
They are unelected, unaccountable.
We have the bureaucracy that is unelected and unaccountable.
And the things that they do to us, even though they have the effect of law, they pretend that it's not law.
Oh, these are rules.
They're not laws.
Now, if they were laws, you would have the protection of the Bill of Rights.
But since they're rules, you don't have the presumption of innocence.
You don't have to be found guilty before we punish you.
And the punishment that we come up with can be excessive.
That's the kind of games that they play in Washington.
But I hope when we talk about this, you'll see the purpose of Elon Musk's Twitter purchase.
And I've always said he is not an altruistic billionaire.
He didn't buy Twitter to help the Babylon Bee guys.
They wanted you to think that, right?
They think that, I think.
They honestly think that, you know?
We had Elon Musk here, and we're talking about how we just got censored.
He says, you know, I should buy it.
It's like, wow, this guy's amazing.
We get censored on Twitter, and Elon Musk goes out and buys it?
That was the Babylon Bee people.
And, of course, now all conservatives.
He saved free speech.
Well, no, what he did was he gave himself a very powerful platform, very powerful politically.
Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post a few years ago for $250 million.
Why?
Well, you know, he didn't buy the Tampa Tribune.
He bought the Washington Post because he wanted political influence.
Elon Musk bought Twitter for the same reason.
And he spent a lot more than that, but he spent a quarter of a billion.
He spent 40-some-odd billion to buy it, but it was still cheap for the influence that he got.
Elon Musk now sits at the pinnacle of power in business and government influence, as well as in global information.
And so, he said, as the election showed, politics and influence, and of course, Axios says, and misinformation.
No, no.
He sits at the center of that, and he is worshiped for that.
Look, and you can see that he didn't stand up for free speech in Brazil.
When they said, well, we're going to shut you down, first they shut everything down, and then he wound up crawling back to them on his hands and knees in Brazil.
And we saw a theory, Britain, After Musk bought Twitter, Theory of Britain went to Austin and said, we've got the DSA that's going to be taking effect next year.
You're going to censor who we tell you to do.
He's like bowing and scraping.
Yes, yes, I will.
Yes, yes, I will.
That was all on video.
I've played that many times.
Theory of Britain is no longer there.
I like to call him conspiracy theory.
Conspiracy theory jumped the shark and was eaten by sharks.
Because he jumped in, he got so heady with all the power that he had, that he wanted to censor, he wanted to punish Twitter for some things regarding the U.S. election.
And Europe did not want to be seen as trying to tell the U.S. what to do with their elections.
So he had to go.
But it wasn't Elon Musk standing up to him.
As the election showed, politics and influence flow downstream from information control.
I always do.
Musk, once seen by many as a fool for buying Twitter?
No.
Now controls the most powerful information platform on America's ruling party.
X makes Fox News seem like a quaint little pamphlet in size, scope, and right-wing tilt.
Again, he's far more powerful than Washington Post, far more powerful than Fox News.
And he has now completely reinvented himself.
This is a guy who was a green, grifting lefty.
And he was worshipped by the leftists.
And the leftists, at least, understand that he's changed.
The conservatives don't understand that.
The conservatives' understanding of Musk begins with his purchase of Twitter.
The lefties who are all on board with Tesla and all the rest of this stuff, they are now furious with Elon Musk.
But he is an idol of the MAGA cult.
And now he controls MAGA media as well.
If it's dangerous to criticize Trump, if it's going to cost you audience and fame and fortune, what do you think doing the same thing on Twitter is going to do?
Or even criticizing Elon Musk on Twitter, right?
Oh, you're going to get punished even worse.
He can make or break people in media, and he's already using that power to make certain people, to bring them up to the top.
Virtually every powerful voice in the Trump media ecosystem congregates on X. Where their reality, whether tethered to facts or fictions, are set.
Imagine you wanted to help mold America.
You would instantly realize that you need information dominance and vast political influence.
Now with X, Trump and Musk have both of these things.
He was at Mar-a-Lago on election night.
He pushed J.D. Vance for the presidential ticket.
Then he helped get Trump and Vance onto Joe Rogan's top podcast.
You see, he controls Tucker, Rogan, you name it, okay?
Alex Jones, any of these people.
Ben Shapiro, any of the people who are on conservative media, they want to flatter and suck up to Musk just like they need to flatter and suck up to Trump.
Well, after the election, he tweeted out the picture of Trump.
He tweeted out, Novus Ordo Secularum, New World Order.
Wine Press News has this title here.
And nothing to see there.
Nothing to worry about, right?
I mean, it's just, you know, like his profile that he had for over a year of him in a Baphomet costume with a satanic upside-down cross on it and everything.
He was really proud of that.
And of course, New World Order.
Wine Press News says, I've said now for the umpteenth time that Trump and Musk are not your friends.
They're controlled opposition liars and cronies.
And if you read my recent report on tokenization, which I covered on Friday, excellent report, you can read all of it at winepressnews.com.
Then you saw the evidence for yourself in that long article that I wrote, in part.
And in that article, again, I'll remind you, he began with a lengthy discussion on tokenization that began with an analysis from Trends Journal, Gerald Slinty's publication.
And it was an excellent article.
And I only covered just the beginning of that article.
I mean, it was very, very long.
And if you want to know about tokenization, we cut out that video from Friday.
So we've got that up as a separate video.
I had somebody ask, can you cut that out so we can pass that around?
Can you talk about it and can you cut it out?
And I already had it set up to talk about it on Friday, so we did cut it out.
So I have a distillation of that.
But if you want to see the full thing, You can go to winepressnews.com and I suggest that you do.
It's an excellent article.
And again, Trends Journal was there about a year or so ago.
If you want to subscribe to Trends Journal, do it.
Tell them that I sent you by using the code NIGHT. You'll save 10% off.
And as Gerald Salenti always points out, look at the price of Wall Street Journal.
It's twice as much per day for the Wall Street Journal as Gerald's publication is per week.
Twice as much per day.
As his is per week.
And it's not filled with fluff about entertainment or culture or any of that kind of stuff.
It's trends about economics and politics.
So you can save 10% off at TrendsJournal.com.
Getting back to this, though, he said, we're clearly getting lied to at every single aspect in our media and by our politicians, none more so than if you are an American.
And if it is not abundantly clear at this point that you and I are getting played And these politicians and pundits are just liars and actors being told to follow the script they've been given, then I don't know what else there is to say or to do for you.
He says, Trump, Musk, and then he starts talking about Javier Malay.
Again, this is Wine Press News.
He says, in the case of Malay, alt- and right-leaning media propped him up as a libertarian, as some sort of hero, especially when he rebuked the World Economic Forum for its terrible ideals.
And, you know, I talked about that and I said, well, it'd be really interesting because the things that he said about economics, he did come at it from a libertarian perspective.
Things were so bad in Argentina that there's only one way to go and that's up.
You know, so anything would have been an improvement.
But I also said when he was doing this stuff, I said, be careful of somebody who's engaging in the kind of theatrics that he does.
You know, the wild hair, the screaming stuff, and the invectives against everybody and everything.
I said, when somebody starts acting like they are part of professional wrestling and Wrestlemania, They may actually be part of professional wrestling and WrestleMania if they act that role.
Same type of stuff we saw with Trump.
You know, creating this persona, this theatrical persona.
And so, he says, as we've pointed out, it wasn't long after Malai gave a firebrand speech at the World Economic Forum at Davos, where he met with BlackRock's Larry Fink, To discuss investment opportunities and infrastructure.
It didn't take long at all, but Malai walked back most of his campaign promises.
See?
Again, when we see people go to Davos, we saw Glenn Youngkin go to Davos, and everybody, all the conservatives said, see, see, he's a sellout.
We saw Brian Kemp, the governor of Georgia, go, yeah, he's a sellout.
But Donald Trump goes and is like, look, he's putting them in their place.
He's not selling out.
Even though...
Within a couple of weeks of coming back, he locks us down with that globalist thing.
No, no, Trump was putting them in their place.
Oh, he wasn't selling out to the World Economic Forum.
He basically offered the same excuse that the governors, Youngkin and Kemp, offered.
Well, I'm just there.
Business opportunities for America.
I'm not selling you guys out.
Anyway, when Malai was speaking at Davos, the crowd of globalists actually enjoyed what he said.
That's what the Financial Times wrote.
They said the global business elite is infatuated with Javier Malai.
The Davos elite had been lectured about losing its way, and they loved it.
Yeah.
They are kind of into this sadomasochism stuff.
I mean, they...
They love it when Malai shows up and wags his finger at him.
And same thing with both Trump and Malai.
Maybe they could get Sam Britton to come and do something with him.
Anyway, Whitney Webb made some great points that he's got in his article here at Wine Press News.
She said, Malai places an ex-GP Morgan and Deutsche Bank executives in charge of his central bank...
Reaches out to outside financiers to further dollarize Argentina.
They cheer down with socialism as private sector companies spread the Treasury Ponzi scheme across the Global South with stablecoins while tokenizing their land and natural resources because that's what it's going to be.
They're going to leverage this thing up, then they're going to cash in this astronomical debt to take our land and natural resources.
So you'll allow BlackRock to build the panopticon of tokenized Earth.
Tokenized Earth.
J-R-R token.
I guess this is what we could call Larry Fink.
He wants to tokenize everything.
Yeah, we're the middle way earth.
You know, we don't have, it's not socialism, it's not capitalism, it's the middle way.
Middle way earth, J.R.R. Tolkien.
Under the dialectic pretext of owning the liberals.
Yeah, that's exactly what Mike Adams was saying.
Yeah, he says, oh, I don't like Trump because of, and I forget what it was, you know, it wasn't really anything that had to do with health, from the health ranger.
But he said, I'll vote for him just because I want to own the libs.
Yeah, great.
Forget about all the people he killed.
Forget about the destruction of all these small businesses and people's lives.
Forget about burning and shredding the Constitution.
Ah, let's own the libs.
Yeah, that's what we should do.
So, they want to own the libs.
Unknowingly connecting all aspects of ownership to centralized databases, walled identity gardens, fractionalized reserve assets, transmitted and issued on the private blockchains of Wall Street banks.
That's what we're looking at.
And Trump's their guy for this stuff.
Remember, he moved the Overton window towards universal basic income.
He moved the Overton window towards smart cities.
He's got his own freedom cities.
And now he's made...
Alliance with all of these Silicon Valley guys.
And he's ready to move us into token world.
Fulfilling Agenda 2030 requires complicit cooperation as much as compromised corporations.
Do not confuse free market capitalism with cronyism or with cartelism, which is the capitalist model embodied by Larry Fink and his fellow Wall Street Elk.
As Wine Press News says, Trump was always part of the same elite class that runs him through the ringer nowadays, and the same for Trump.
Again, you know, the two of them can reinvent themselves and nobody ever asks what changed or why.
Trump was Jeffrey Epstein's best friend forever.
Now he's the hero of big Christianity.
Which isn't Christian at all, quite frankly.
And the same way with Elon Musk.
He was the hero of the left, and now the partying on the left is now partying on the right at Mar-a-Lago.
Don't get fooled again.
The Hegelian dialectic is not just that.
What we're witnessing is a rebrandishing of the old Soviet tactics that were deployed when communism was taking over Russia.
And he talks about Operation Trust, The Trust.
By the way, I've mentioned this before.
It's a very interesting series.
It was about, what, six or seven series.
Riley, Ace of Spies, and I'm sure you can find it on the Internet.
We had Sam Neill, you know, pretty famous for being in Jurassic Park, but he's been in a lot of different things.
But he played Sigmund Riley, who was in Fleming's real-life model for James Bond.
It's a fascinating series because it's back the early part of the 20th century.
And it's not just about what happened as the communists were taking over in Russia.
Yeah, there's a lot of that.
And he was very much involved in that.
He was involved in a counter move to try to dethrone the communists called the Lockhart Plot.
Involving the British Ambassador Lockhart.
It's very famous in Russia, but not much talked about in the West.
But the most interesting aspect of...
Well, and then there's other aspects as well.
You see how he was involved in working with the British government to set up British petroleum and other things like that because they realized that the energy for the war machine was going to be moving to oil instead of coal.
They needed oil for their ships and for their other machines that they were going to have.
So they were trying to get a foothold in Saudi Arabia and other places like that.
So he had interesting involvement.
The first episode I thought was the weakest.
But if you get past that first episode, it really is gripping.
And it's a great series.
And one of the things that comes out of it is that as they were trying to get rid of the communists, the Bolsheviks, the Bolsheviks came up with a very effective strategy, the trust.
Felix Derzhinsky was the head of the predecessor to the KGB, the Cheka.
And it was a masterstroke.
What they did was they funded...
All of the anti-Bolshevik groups all over the world.
And they did that.
There was a Russian government that was funding their opposition.
They did it so that they would know who their opposition was.
And so they could control the opposition.
And it is something that everybody learned from.
And everybody does that.
And it's being done in America to this day.
So I would highly recommend you watch Riley Ace of Spies.
Very entertaining series.
Author Leo Homan says, Wine Press News says, I think says it best as well.
In some ways, the deception is even stronger under a Republican regime.
This is what I've always said.
At least we know what to expect from Democrats who show outright contempt for Christianity.
They hate us and they hate our values.
And for the Constitution and for America in general, we know who they are.
Instead, we've got these people who pretend that they're with us to gain our trust.
The trust.
Trump presents us with problems that, while different from the Biden-Harris-Marxist wing of the unit party, every bit is worrisome and much more deceptive.
That's the key thing.
Trump's transition team lead says that RFK Jr.
will not actually have a role in HHS and only have access to vaccine data, contrary to what has been promoted publicly.
And that's just one of the early incidents.
As he points out, J.D. Vance, Vivek the Snake, Rama Smarmy, and Elon Musk are deeply invested in biotech and in all these mRNA vaccines.
I mean, Elon Musk even had CureVac.
Back in 2020, he's setting up MRNA manufacturing.
Trump campaigned in 2016 on regulating Wall Street and bringing back Glass-Steagall.
But when elected, he further deregulated Wall Street instead.
Trump campaigned as loving WikiLeaks.
But then he let Mike Pompeo plot to imprison and murder Julian Assange.
And he even said, after holding rallies, one after the other, WikiLeaks!
I love WikiLeaks!
The great WikiLeaks!
And Julian Assange says, I don't know who they are.
Remember that?
But we want to talk about somebody who is a bull-faced liar.
You know, just look at those videos back-to-back.
I've played them back-to-back in the past.
Oh, WikiLeaks.
Wonderful WikiLeaks.
I don't know who WikiLeaks is.
He refused to pardon Assange, and you have Mike Pompeo and other people in the intelligence community plotting to assassinate him.
Instead, Trump pardoned financial criminals like Michael Milken, Like Jared Kushner's criminal friends, some of the biggest white-collar criminals ever.
Pardon them.
And he says, and then this, and so much more, is why BlackRock's Larry Fink recently came out and said, as I pointed out last week, I'm tired of hearing that this is the biggest election in your lifetime.
The reality is that over time, it doesn't matter.
Trump and the MAGA movement of deceived and gullible Americans and professing Christians and so-called Christian nationalists are being goaded like cattle and sheep straight to the slaughterhouse.
Same way he did it on January the 6th.
And then he says, and I thought this interesting for what it's worth.
This is in Wine Press News.
He says, and after all this, he says, did you notice...
That when Trump announced that he was running for re-election in 2022, it was exactly 666 days, 666, since he left office the first time.
That the Church of Satan's website, MAGA, is the highest rank one can achieve, which is granted by being a, quote, mover and a shaker, unquote, one of the great successes in the world.
And that, Wine Press News says, the Black Swan assassination attempt earlier this year It was probably an occultic ritual showing who he truly serves.
And, of course, we've had Alex Jones even talking about how he thinks Trump is a great candidate for Antichrist.
But now he's transcended just being about positivity into something messianic, which, I mean, if you get a snapshot of Trump, he's a dark person, but also, I mean, look, look.
Look, if anybody can be the Antichrist, and I don't think he's the Antichrist, but he's the type of person, also Elon Musk.
I mean, there's some definite dark energy around Trump, and I know if I was ever controlled opposition, it was unwittingly being sucked into it.
He was controlled, but unwittingly.
Yeah.
If I was ever controlled opposition, you know, if I ever took orders from Steve Pachenik, who was a little errand boy for Henry Kissinger, all these years, we go to Bilderberg, and I get fired by the guy who was Henry Kissinger's errand boy for telling the truth about January the 6th.
Interesting world, isn't it?
Utterly unacceptable.
Musk makes a crucial endorsement for Senate Majority Leader.
And he uses his clout there at Twitter.
And of course this is WND, another Trump MAGA site.
Who will be the chamber's new leader, with some saying outgoing majority leader Mitch McConnell is trying to thwart the plans of the president-elect?
Two of the three candidates hate Trump, and what he ran on?
One of them, John Cornyn, is an angry liberal whose politics are indistinguishable from Liz Cheney.
So this is what he put out on X. Call your senator.
Demand a public endorsement of Rick Scott.
Again.
Susie Wiles worked for Rick Scott as a campaign director.
I don't have a dog in this fight.
A pox upon all three of them.
As a matter of fact, I would say when you look at the senators, you get 53 Republicans and 47.
It might be like 54, 46.
It might wind up being that way.
But there's not any of the 100 Republicans That I would walk across the street to vote for.
Musk made his pick known.
He said, Rick Scott for Senate Majority Leader.
He put up polls on Twitter.
And of course, you know, Musk would never interfere with a poll on his own platform, would he?
I'm sure that it is scientific and honest, all the ones that he puts up.
And when he put up that poll, who should be Senate Majority Leader?
Surprise, surprise, the person that he likes.
Got 66%.
It's amazing how much he can affect things.
And he might not even have to go in and physically manipulate the poll.
I mean, he could do that if he wanted to, but he can manipulate the people on Twitter easily enough.
And so I guess MAGA is now, instead of Make America Great Again, it's now Musk America Grift Again.
Because that's what it's going to be.
It's going to be a Musk grift again.
So finally, Reason says, How Donald Trump and Elon Musk could cut $2 trillion in government spending.
See, already he's co-president, even in the mind of Reason magazine.
Except that, you know, they're not saying, well, co-president, but they're saying, well, you know, he said he's going to put him in charge of eliminating things.
And, of course, the reason says, well, the way you get $2 trillion to be cut down is to cut out entire chunks of government.
But they're not going to do that.
And they're not going to cut $2 trillion.
But they do point out, they said, you know, it wasn't that long ago.
Five years ago...
We had a $4.4 trillion budget for the entire year.
And now it is $6.8 trillion.
So could we live without that $2 trillion?
That's the argument that Harry Brown used to always make.
When I was running for Congress in 1996, he was running, and again, he ran in the year 2000, and he said, you know, could you live with a government that was the size it was five years ago?
Do you realize all of the tax cuts that we could do?
You know, you want to cut the income tax?
We could do that if we had a government that was the size that it was five years ago, and that's what reason is saying now.
He'd also say, would it be worth it to you to get rid of your favorite government program if you could get rid of the income tax?
Yeah, would you do?
Because probably the income tax takes in a small enough percentage of the overall stuff when you look at the fact that the vast majority of what the federal government spends for, they don't even have any taxes for it.
And the income tax is just a small portion of that.
The best way to cut $2 trillion out of the budget is to axe everything that the federal government does that it shouldn't be doing in the first place, says Reason.
You don't need a genius to know that.
You don't need the world's richest man to do that.
Except the strange thing is that the world's richest man got that way by taking money from the government.
This is the ultimate double-think.
That the guy who became so rich, the king of crony capitalism, is now going to be president of efficiency at the government.
There is not anything that these MAGA people won't believe.
Time to start selling multiple copies of the Brooklyn Bridge to them because they will buy anything.
It's absolutely amazing.
Yeah, more rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Brandon Grateful Baptist said the MAGA cult will never be changed if 2020 didn't convince them.
I was fully on board 2016 to 2019 or so and woke up when he called me non-essential.
Yeah, I've said that many times.
So what's worse?
Being called deplorable, being called non-essential, being called garbage.
You know, what point do we understand?
I think I got the message.
Brandon got the message.
I got the message as well.
I think we know what they think of us.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
you Welcome back, and I want to thank people that have sent contributions and support by mail.
And let me run through the list here real quickly just to call them out because we don't have a way that we can respond to them.
Martin K., Mary N., Scott and Samantha T., Kurt and Karen O., thank you very much.
That was very generous.
Thank you.
Mark C. T. K. in Ohio.
Joel B. Lois L. Maryland B. H. D. from North Carolina.
Eric K. Patrick M. Joy E. Kimberly S. Austin M. Thank you very much.
There's a Wolfpack and Angel H. Who sent this book?
Too Many Songs by Tom Lehrer and Not Enough Drawings.
And Karen saw this and she said, who's Tom Lehrer?
And I said, oh, I know him.
I've played his song many times.
He's got a whole bunch of songs, satire songs.
I guess the most popular one he had was Poisoning Pigeons in the Park.
That's not my favorite.
My favorite was one he did about Wernher von Braun.
The rockets go up, the rockets go down.
It's not my concern, says Wernher von Braun.
He talks about how he's got to learn Chinese now.
I mean, this is a satire that Tom Lehrer was doing back in the 60s.
I think he's in his 90s now.
I think he's still alive.
But thank you so much for the music book.
And it is filled with notes and other things throughout there.
So I appreciate that.
Thank you.
And thank you all for your support.
Very kind, very generous.
And we've updated the gas gauge now.
It's one notch past 50%.
You do have it updated?
Okay.
One notch past 50%.
So we're doing good.
We're on our way to actually making the goal for the first time this year.
So, thank you.
I hope we can continue that.
But thank you all for your support.
We can't thank our friends enough.
And we do think of you as friends, even though we haven't met you.
But I appreciate that so much.
Let's talk a little bit about one more thing before we move away from politics.
And that is the tapes that came out from...
Michael Wolff, who did the critical Trump biography in 2018, and Trump threatened to sue him, but never did, interestingly enough.
Perhaps he was worried that discovery and the evidence might be actually more damning to him.
But as part of his research, and it was released just before the election, the Saturday before the election, we had a transcript that was published by Michael Wolff, Of an interview that he had at length with Jeffrey Epstein.
So he talked to Jeffrey Epstein in 2017.
Very long conversation about Donald Trump doing research for his book.
And then in 2018 he releases the book.
In 2019 I think was when Epstein died in prison.
And as part of that he said he was very afraid of Trump.
Worried that he might have him killed.
Who knows what happened to Epstein?
Who knows if he's even dead?
I don't know.
But one of the things I think when you look at this, the fact that the two of them were incredibly close friends, and I think it's important because when we look at the vaccine, the mRNA vaccine defines Trump's corruption.
His Jeffrey Epstein friendship defines his character.
And so when you look at these two things, you look at Epstein and mRNA, it's a no-sell as far as I'm concerned.
Jeffrey Epstein described himself as Trump's closest friend, unquote.
He claimed intimate knowledge of his proclivity for sex, including cuckolding his best friends.
The convicted pedophile even boasted of his closeness to Trump and his now-wife Melania by claiming that...
Trump got to know Melania, in the biblical sense, on the Lolita Express itself.
And of course, we have been told that Melania was one of his girls, one of Epstein's girls before Trump.
Epstein spoke at length about Trump with the author Michael Wolff in August 2017, two years before being found dead in his cell.
And so we're supposed to believe that Trump was actually just the opposite of this, you know.
He was actually, we were told the entire Trump presidency, we were told that Trump was secretly going around and rounding up networks of pedophiles.
Instead, he was partying with them, right?
Making common cause with them.
We were told that he was going to bring a spiritual revival.
But it's actually the opposite.
We're supposed to believe that he's going to use JFK to stop pharmaceutical corruption and murder.
It's exactly the opposite of that as well.
Epstein painted a complicated portrait of Trump.
He called him charming, said he was always fun, said he was capable of extraordinary salesmanship.
He suggested he was personally in favor of Trump's policies on the transgender stuff.
He also claimed that while Trump has friends, he was at heart a friendless man, incapable of kindness.
And he alleged that Trump had undergone scalp reduction surgery for baldness, which is one of the few things that we are not surprised by, right?
Even if you were surprised by his long-term close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.
For a decade, he said.
He says, I was Donald Trump's closest friend for 10 years.
And it's true.
I talked about that.
They were inseparable.
They were always partying together in New York or partying together in Florida.
The thing that came between them was real estate.
Both of them wanted this key piece of real estate, and that broke up their friendship and the competition for it.
And then shortly after that, somebody reported Jeffrey Epstein as a pedophile.
Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
Wolf also said that he had showed off photos of Trump with topless young women sitting in his lap.
It isn't just Jeffrey Epstein.
When Fire and Fury, the book that Michael Wolf published, came out in January 2018, Trump tried to stop it with a failed cease and desist order.
Then he threatened to sue, but nothing ever happened.
Again, like I said, I think he was probably more afraid of discovery.
Wolf says he has up to 100 hours of recordings of interviews with Epstein, including using him as a source for Fire and Fury, which, by the way, sold 5 million copies worldwide.
Wolf said he decided to release parts of the archive after a new accuser, a former Miss Switzerland, alleged that Trump had groped her.
These were all things that were happening at the last minute for the election, as if people didn't know, right?
So, they offer extraordinary insights on Epstein, who in 2017 was shuttling freely on his two private jets between his Manhattan townhouse, his Palm Beach, Florida estate, and his private island in Little St.
James, the Virgin Islands, the pedo island that was there.
Asked by Wolf, how do you know all this?
Epstein replied, I was his closest friend for ten years.
Exactly.
So, that is who the man is.
And that's his background.
And yet we're supposed to believe that he is going to be our future.
As a matter of fact, I had Jay and Jessica sent me a link to an article That someone who is a state representative here in Tennessee put up, saying that the U.S. is not Sodom and Gomorrah.
The U.S. is really Nineveh, that we've repented.
And I guess the question is, is that really true?
Is that even remotely true?
I don't think it is.
As a matter of fact, when you look at Trump and you look at Melania, you had RT, I don't know, trolling Trump, talking about Melania and showing pictures, the nude pictures that she did, and talking about how proud she is of it.
What is that really about?
You know, we have, in the words of John Piper, I mentioned this last week, he really got raked over the coals by a lot of these big evangelists.
He's got a big reputation himself.
But what he said was, the presidential, he tweeted this out, he said, presidential election results, having delivered us from one evil, God now tests us with another.
And I thought it was interesting how angry people got with him.
These big TV evangelist types, although they're now social media evangelists, I guess.
All these people were saying, yeah, you need to vote for the lesser of two evils.
Well, that means that they're both still evil.
And that's essentially what he was saying.
He said, God has delivered us from one kind of evil, now we get a different kind of evil.
And he's going to test us with that.
And instead, you get a lot of pushback.
Eric Metaxas So this is religious horse crap.
Is it?
Or is your idolatry of Trump religious horse crap?
I think it's that, Eric.
Or you got Sean, I don't know how to pronounce it, Sean Foych, F-E-U-C-H-T. He went around doing a lot of public worship services, kind of in defiance of Trump's lockdown stuff.
But now he's fully on board with Trump.
And from Mar-a-Lago, he replied to it.
He said, this is just a massive liberal take here.
He tweeted that out from Mar-a-Lago, as this guy is now partying with Trump.
Like I said before, the partying on the left...
Is now partying on the right.
And that includes these people who are, I guess you could call them Christian leaders.
Just call them spiritual leaders.
How about that?
Call them spiritual leaders, whatever spirit they are worshiping.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
And now, The David Knight Show.
Well, let's take a quick look at some news.
I thought this was interesting.
It caught my eye.
43 monkeys escaped a research lab.
This was on Friday.
They've now recovered most of them.
Well, I'd say about half of them or so have been recovered.
They're urging people, lock the windows, lock the doors, don't interact with the monkeys.
We don't know what they've been contaminated with, if anything.
Police still searching for 43 monkeys that escaped from a research facility in South Carolina on Wednesday made me think of the movie 12 Monkeys.
This is four times as bad, really.
That was a Terry Gilliam film, Predictive Programming, about pandemics, of course.
And it's been a long time since I've seen it.
The rough idea is that there's this group...
Call themselves the Army of Twelve Monkeys, and they were about going around freeing animals out of laboratories where they were being experimented on, I think, either accidentally or something like that.
Supposedly, they were blamed for setting loose a virus that killed most of humanity, you know, like seven out of the eight billion people.
Just like the Georgia Guidestones wanted.
But anyway, they have a time traveler who goes back in time to see what's going on with all of it.
And a lot of themes that you see from Terry Gilliam.
He likes time travel stuff.
He likes dystopian, totalitarian movies like that.
He also doesn't do happy endings with it.
You find out that it was an engineered virus that killed everybody coming out of the labs.
Anyway, getting back to this.
Locals were urged to lock their windows and doors, not to interact with the monkeys.
Instead, call 9-11 immediately upon spotting any of the escaped primates.
The staff at Alpha Genesis are currently attempting to entice the animals back using food in order to ensure their safe capture.
Well, hey, it works for MAGA and Democrats, so why not monkeys, right?
The company hopes that one-way traps containing apples will entice the animals.
The company told the police that the animals were too young to carry disease, although it's unclear whether this means that they're incapable of contracting disease or simply hadn't been introduced into any clinical trials.
Well, of course, if you're going to get sick, you can get sick at any age anyway.
Alpha Genesis.
What a weird name that is, too, right?
Just to emphasize, it's the beginning.
It's the start of something.
Alpha, Genesis, I don't know.
Something's starting here.
What are they going to start at?
Alpha Genesis, who knows?
They carry out medical research for a range of clients for several different conditions, including brain disorders.
There's your zombie apocalypse.
Brains.
We got brains out there.
The company secured a federal contract to run a colony of 3,500 monkeys on Morgan Island off the coast of South Carolina, also known as Monkey Island.
Well, that's appropriate.
Animal rights advocates have raised concerns over the ethics of using primates in medical research on such a scale.
Now, there's this group that wants to free them all, actually.
Well, now they've...
They've recaptured 25 of them.
That means that 18 remain on the loose as of last night.
And one of the other reasons that this caught my eye, it wasn't just because of 12 monkeys, but because of personal experience that I had with somebody that was friends with my parents.
He was a little bit older than them, but he had some grandchildren who, they...
They got a spider monkey and another group of grandchildren got some dogs.
And then they get tired of their pets.
And they just leave them with grandma and grandpa, which is the strangest thing.
I mean, you know, we don't want this German Shepherd anymore.
They wind up with a German Shepherd.
Same thing with a spider monkey.
And what they did was they had...
We went over there one day and we're looking at them and...
And it was kind of interesting.
The spider monkey was amusing, really.
And he would get on the German Shepherd and ride on his back.
I mean, you talk about the expression, I got a monkey on my back.
They must have been watching these two, because the German Shepherd did not want the monkey on his back, and he kept trying to scrape him off everywhere, just like that horse tried to scrape me off, or did scrape me off, actually.
But he was not able to get the monkey off his back.
So they had in their backyard, they had a really large tree, and they had covered this thing around the outside with wire.
So the monkey was free to climb up all through the tree and everything, but it was all sealed.
Except the monkey had escaped and disappeared for quite some time, they told us.
And then came back, you know, kind of like these monkeys are coming back in South Carolina to get the apples that, you know, hey, you know, I had it pretty good back there.
Had free food, all the rest of the stuff.
It's kind of like Pseudalus the slave.
Funny thing happened on the way of the forum.
I want to be free, free, freedom, you know.
Wait a minute.
If I was free, nothing would be free.
So he has his second thoughts about wanting his freedom.
Well, that's the way the animals are here.
You know, if you feed them, they're going to come back.
So he eventually came back.
And they needed some painting done, and they called a painting contractor, and he came to their house one day to do an estimate, and he said, you know...
This neighborhood, he said, I had the strangest thing ever.
I had a job here a few months ago or whatever, and he said, I finished the job, and then I come back the next day, and he said, there were these tiny handprints and paint all over the walls and ceiling and everything.
He said, I had to redo that whole house again.
And he said, and they were like the size of a little kid, but they were up really high.
I couldn't figure out what was going on with it.
And they said, well, thanks, but we decided that we changed our mind about the paint.
They didn't want to have this guy come in and see the spider monkey.
He's got to figure out that the spider monkey had gotten into the paint in that house and completely trashed everything.
Anyway, I always think of that whenever I see pet monkeys.
I always think of that story.
On a serious note...
We have U.S. farmers girding up for trade wars on the Trump tariff pledges.
Now, they've already done this once before.
So even though you've got a lot of these farmers who are big supporters of Trump, they realize that he nearly broke them in the past when he went to war with China.
Because they depended on exports to China.
And when he started playing the trade war with China, they cut off these agricultural exports, and they never recovered.
And if you remember at the time, you know, everybody was talking about how damaging that was going to be to the farmers.
But in the same thing that Trump did in 2020, where he locks people down, where he tells businesses you're not essential, and he gives them some chump change.
We should call it Trump change.
And so he gives them a little bit of money as a stimulus check, a little bit of unemployment.
He did the same thing with the farmers and nearly broke them as well.
Trump's tariffs since 2018 hit some $300 billion worth of Chinese imports, sparking retaliation that targeted key farm products.
One guy that they talked to, he said there was no money to pay the bills.
There was no money to actually have a living out of the operation.
He's a Minnesota farmer.
He grows corn and soybeans.
He said, for example, between 2017 and 2018, when Trump was doing his trade war with China, his soybean income fell by over $25,000.
And then, you know, Trump comes in with a handout, you know, just like he later did in 2020.
But he said it wasn't enough.
He says it was less than half of the shortfall and nearly broken.
Just like he broke so many businesses in 2020.
Same pattern over and over again from Trump.
I'm going to shut you down.
And here's a little bit of universal basic income.
Here's a little bit of welfare handout.
I'm going to shut your business down with my tax policies.
I'm going to shut your business down with my pandemic policies.
And here's a little bit of change for you.
How about that?
Retaliatory tariffs on the U.S. caused more than $27 billion in U.S. agricultural export losses from mid-2018 to late-2019, said the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
And what happened is, after the trade war ended, the trade with China never recovered.
Because, of course, China had to find alternative sources to When Trump shut them off.
And so, you know, he shut them off, didn't buy their products, so they then voluntarily decided not to buy the American products, and they went elsewhere to get them.
And then they decided, just as we've seen with Biden and the economic sanctions that he ran on Russia and so forth, people realized, hey, you're going to use the dollar as a weapon?
You're going to use the import-export stuff as a weapon?
Well, we'll just trade with other people.
And so a lot of the trade never came back for these farmers.
And so they're looking at it, and they support Trump for other reasons, but they're very concerned that this tariff war that he is predicting he's going to do is going to be something that could finally put them out of business.
Without foreign buyers like China to absorb excess farm production, the market becomes oversaturated.
Federal payments may have been helpful to farmers during the trade war, but trade ramifications extended long beyond it.
Many tariffs China imposed on U.S. farm products have been given a waiver, but could be reinstated.
And it could trigger an average drop of 51.8% in soybean exports.
Corn exports would also slide.
And taking up the slack are places like Brazil and Argentina.
They said, hey, we're not going to play games with you.
We will sell you our stuff and you can buy from us.
Meanwhile, in the UK, we have the labor department there has betrayed the farmers after saying, you know, we want to have a better relationship with you.
But they're more concerned about their green agenda and they want to shut down the farms.
And the way that they're going to do it should be very concerning to everybody.
We've seen this type of approach from Democrats for a long period of time, and not just for farmers but also for any small business, to make it so that you cannot pass that business on to your children.
But it's especially true of farmers, because they typically are land rich, but they are cash poor.
And so if you're not going to exempt them from estate taxes and inheritance taxes and stuff like that, that will cause the farm to be liquidated.
And that's exactly what the UK Labor Party is doing.
And the farmers are trying to figure out how they're going to push back against this.
Rebel farmers are threatening to target ports and to disrupt supermarket supply chains in order to protest this labor tax.
A number are also plotting to hold produce and livestock in a bid to trigger food shortages.
You know, they shouldn't have to do that.
People ought to voluntarily make common cause with farmers if we really understood where our bread is being buttered, you know.
Ha ha ha.
Don't think about it.
It just comes from the supermarket.
We don't even think about it.
Where does that come from?
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, that's the Treasury Department equivalent in the UK, placed a 20% inheritance tax on farmers' assets.
Previously, tax breaks were designed to allow family farms to be able to pass down for generations.
And they exempted them from this, but now farmers are openly discussing plans on how to take a more radical course of action.
Again, if you hit them with a 20%, if you value the land at some imaginary price, right?
You're going to reevaluate it just like they do our property taxes here?
You're going to reevaluate it on the death of the person who had the farm and then say, okay, now you've got to pay 20% of what I've just said this farm is worth.
Well, they don't have that kind of money.
Nobody would.
And it's just that easy.
That's how they can get rid of all the small farms here in the U.S. as well.
Democrats have flirted with this stuff and proposed it many times.
And what do you think the 80,000 IRS agents are for?
How do you think they're going to get the land that they so crave here?
Some farmers are now openly discussing plans to take a more radical course of action.
And so they say, well, we could do, we could have go slow events on the road.
That's not a good idea.
I mean, that really caused everybody to hate the green people who blockaded the roads.
That is a really, really bad strategy to make yourself the bad guy.
They've also talked about blockades of ports and food distribution centers.
They'll block every port in the UK if they had to, said one of them.
The government and supermarkets need to realize the control that we have as farmers.
Again, what is not talked about is trying to join with consumers.
I think you had some of this happen in the Netherlands.
You know, they had a new party that was created, and I don't think they had enough farmers to have success with that new party.
They had to have other people who realized that that was how they were going to be able to eat real food, is to join with the farmers.
And so I think that is always the case, and yet so many times what we do is we allow the politicians to divide us, whether it's black versus white or whether it's urban versus farmer, and we don't realize our common cause.
They divide and conquer us.
We need to start joining with the farmers on these issues.
By the way, I don't think that—I'd be very surprised.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'd be very surprised to see Thomas Massey in as Department of Agriculture.
That's not something that anybody in the Trump administration put out.
And Thomas Massey, it only takes a small slight from Trump that he interprets that as disloyalty, and you're done.
And he tried to get Thomas Massey primaried out in 2020 because he didn't want to play along with the lockdown and the stimulus checks that were going to put us into $4 trillion worth of debt.
So I don't think that's going to happen.
It would be a good thing if it did, but I don't think that's going to happen.
They said this would mirror widespread protests that we saw in Europe earlier this year where farmers used their tractors to barricade a Belgian port as well as routes to several ports in Germany.
The founder of the Farming Forum, UK's biggest agricultural online forum, said some farmers were looking at other actions from not taking sewage sludge to not letting food leave the farm or sending livestock to marketplace.
He said, I can see produce being withheld.
Well, again, that's going to hurt them as well.
And we need to think about this kind of stuff because this is all coming to us as well, folks.
It's happening.
It's been happening in Europe.
It's happening in the UK. It's going to be coming to America.
They're coming after the farmers everywhere.
They're all part of this globalist conspiracy.
They're breathing together.
That's what conspiracy means.
They've got an agenda.
They've got a plot.
They've got a program.
They're going to implement it step by step.
They'll use some kind of a crisis or whatever to kick it off, but it's coming.
That's the agenda.
They're all on board with that globalist agenda to get rid of independent farms.
Some farmers were threatening to stop spreading the sewage sludge on their land in protest of plans to impose the inheritance tax.
Sewage sludge is what remains of human waste after the liquids have been removed.
So what we're talking about here is the fact that they're not really interested in taking any more excrement from the government.
In a lot of different ways.
This is kind of a sludge hits the fan scenario that is developing there.
It said every year farmers in the UK take about 3.6 million tons of sewage sludge from water treatment plants and they spread it on agricultural land and it is a win-win process.
They don't have to process it, pay to process it, and then they can use it as fertilizer.
Mr.
Bradshaw said that the farmers who expect to live longer than five years are now pinning their hopes on labor's defeat in the next election.
It's going to be five years.
They're going to have to hold out against this.
And, of course, who knows if you're going to live for five years, right?
I mean, even if you're young, nobody has promised tomorrow or even this afternoon.
Any of us could die at any point.
But it's just a horrific thing.
And it's a very calculated thing to destroy generational farms.
Before the general election, labor had promised to build, quote, a new relationship with the countryside.
Well, I guess they did keep that promise, just not in the way that people had hoped, right?
And then when you look at how much our own government hates us, we had over the weekend, it was leaked to the Daily Wire, that a FEMA official had ordered other FEMA workers to skip any houses that had Trump signs.
This was in Florida.
A FEMA official ordered workers to bypass the homes of Trump supporters as they were surveying damage caused by Hurricane Milton in Florida, according to internal correspondence that was obtained by The Daily Wire.
A FEMA supervisor told workers in the message to, quote, avoid homes advertising Trump, unquote, as they canvassed Lake Placid, Florida, to identify residents who could qualify for federal aid.
I wonder if they looked at it in Tennessee and North Carolina and said, well, they're all Trump supporters.
Let's just forget about all of them, right?
So the supervisor's name, who has now been fired, unfortunately, but the supervisor's name was Marnay Washington, relayed this message both verbally and in a group chat.
So they had the receipts.
They had the documents to show that she was doing this in her early 30s.
So, the government employees told the Daily Wire that at least 20 homes with Trump signs or flags were skipped from the end of October into November due to this guidance.
Images shared with the Daily Wire showed the houses were skipped over by the workers who wrote in the government system messaging system things such as, quote, Trump sign, no entry per leadership.
So, here's a picture of this house.
We skipped over it because it's got a Trump sign, and that's what the leadership told us.
The employees are part of a Department of Homeland Security Surge Capacity Force Team.
The surge.
We got the surge right here.
Seems like, you know, we talk about swarms.
As my son Whistler said, nothing good ever comes from a swarm.
Apparently nothing good ever comes from a surge either.
We had Fauci with his surge.
We had Petraeus with his surge.
We got the Homeland Security people with their surge of workers to help you.
We're from the government.
We're here to help you, right?
Meaning that they volunteered from other DHS agencies to help an understaffed FEMA. Yeah, right.
FEMA says it has now fired that worker, Marnay.
Well, you know, we mentioned earlier the fact that you've got all these people who, when Trump attacked RFK Jr., they went on the counterattack, and they talked about Susie Wiles and her connection with the pharmaceutical industry.
And now everybody is...
Deleting their stuff, right?
And the organization there, Mercury, that she is still a part of, scrubbed their page talking about her.
Well, it's very important for us to have the Internet Archive, isn't it?
It's very important that we not allow this stuff to be memory-holded.
And yet, the Internet Archive has been under attack for quite some time.
It's been under lawfare attack.
It's been under directed denial of service, DDoS attack.
And it has now had hackers who have exploited the fact that it's open source code to attack it.
And all of this happened, interestingly enough, primarily in the three weeks leading up to the election.
We don't want to go back and look up anything on anybody before an election, do we?
Hit with a massive hacking attack that began on the 8th of October.
And when they were able, they completely shut down the Internet Archive for a while.
When they were able to get it back, it was, for the longest time, read-only.
And now that it is back, they say that they still have a three-week black hole where nothing was recorded on the Wayback Machine.
As of the 14th of October, the Wayback Machine was back online, but in a read-only state.
And then by the 24th of October, the Internet Archive announced that most of its main sites and services are back up and running, including publicly available.
Text, TV news search, borrowing, audio files, moving images, things like that.
As of the 29th of October, they confirmed that all of their sites and services were back online.
They said there's no damage to the data, but there is a missing three weeks where people were not allowed to archive, where they could not archive content.
And so the question that everybody is asking is, who is this coming from?
And what was the purpose of it?
Was this a test?
And I think this is clearly a test, a practice run, a trial run, because it's not limited just to the Wayback Machine, the Internet Archive.
It is a test, I think, to see what they can do in the future.
They want to get rid of this problem.
Information that was there.
Other efforts to restrict access to archived records.
A lawsuit where four major publishers took the Internet Archive to court for making books available to read online in its National Emergency Library.
Once everything got locked down with the COVID pandemic, they said, well, we got a lot of e-books here.
We're going to set this up as a library thing.
They said, we, you know, We'll buy the e-books, and we will only allow people to check out one.
Well, the book, if it's checked out, would not be allowed to be checked out by somebody else.
But, of course, we all know that if they get an e-book, they can make a copy of it.
So they were sued by publishing Clearinghouse, even though a lot of these books were older books, quite a bit older.
And the Democrats, by the way, never talked about this.
They're only concerned if you take porn away from the kids in school.
Oh, then you're burning books, then you're censoring things.
But, you know, if you want to shut down the Internet Archive, if you want to set up a lawsuit against them for having some e-books during lockdown, oh, that's perfectly fine.
Just don't take away the porn from the kids, because then the Democrats are going to be upset.
So the timing was just perfect for the election.
And as Jeffrey Tucker says, is this a deep state?
He says, as with all things, there's no way to know, but the effort to blast away the ability of the Internet to have a verified history fits very neatly into the stakeholder model of information distribution that's been clearly prioritized on a global level.
The Declaration of the Future of the Internet, that's a document they put out, makes it very clear that the Internet should be, quote, governed through the multi-stakeholder approach.
Whereby governments and relevant authorities partner with academics, civil society, the private sector, and the technical community.
So in other words, government and corporations are going to decide what you can have access to and what you can see, and what will remain on the internet, and what will be erased.
Disturbingly, this erasure of internet memory is happening in more than one place for many years.
Google offered a cached version of the link that you were seeking just below the live version.
They have plenty of server space that they could do that still, but no, they have now disappeared that service.
So you can no longer see the archived versions when you do search.
You don't have that option.
In fact, the Google Cash service officially ended just a week or two before archive.org crashed at the end of September 24.
So all these things were happening all at the same time.
It certainly does look like it was a conspiracy.
In the same way that when we have all of these governments doing exactly the same nonsensical stuff with a pandemic that had never been done before, and all doing it in lockstep with each other, that kind of looked like a conspiracy too, didn't it?
Thus, the two available tools for searching cached pages on the internet disappeared within weeks of each other, and within weeks of the November election.
Google now uses very different metrics to rank search results other than popularity, including what it considers to be trusted sources and other opaque and subjective determinations.
Of course, that means that the government and the corporations trust you as a source.
The most widely used service that once ranked websites based on traffic is now gone.
That service was called Alexa.
Does that sound familiar?
But of course we have now seen the term Alexa completely redefined by Amazon.
And it was Amazon who bought Alexa.
Alexa was an independent company bought by Amazon in 1999.
And what it would do is it would rank websites and articles and things like that, right?
So you could go through that and you could see what was popular and what was not.
In 2014, 15 years after acquiring Alexa, Amazon did a strange thing.
It released its home assistant and its surveillance device called Alexa.
Hey, Alexa, everybody says now, right?
Well, it used to be something that you would look up to find out how popular articles or websites were.
Something seemed strange about Amazon naming its new product after an unrelated business that it owned that it had bought 15 years earlier.
No doubt there was some confusion caused by the remaining overlap.
And then what happened next was in 2022, Amazon actively took down the web ranking tool, Alexa.
It didn't sell it.
It didn't raise the prices.
It didn't do anything with it.
It suddenly just made it go completely dark.
No one could figure out why.
Alexa was the industry standard of ranking websites.
And suddenly it was gone.
It wasn't sold.
It just blasted away.
No longer could anyone figure out the traffic-based website rankings of anything without paying very high prices for hard-to-use proprietary products.
And it's kind of interesting, you know, in terms of talking about these e-books.
Not long after Amazon started doing this Kindle stuff, they deleted...
1984, off of people's computers that had bought Orwell's 1984, downloaded it on their computers, and then Amazon went in and erased it.
You don't think that was a message to people?
You don't think that was deliberate?
They say, oh, it was an error.
How do you have an error like that to go in and focus on that title?
I think it was an interesting test, and I think it was a signal at the same time.
Well, as we talk about all the politics in Texas, the secessionists are encouraged after these election results because they had 10 politicians elected to the State House of Representatives in Texas All of whom signed on to the Texas First Pledge to talk about secession.
And again, as I mentioned earlier in the program, we got Gavin Newsom saying we're going to Trump-proof California.
Well, I don't know exactly what he's got planned.
We have James Roguski did a live stream about that on Friday or Saturday, and you can see that on his sub-stack, what he thinks is up with that.
But again, we've seen the liberals in California after Trump got in in 2017.
Now it looks like they're doing it again.
But I think Newsom has – they talk about secession – And other things like that.
But of course it could also be nullification.
That's a legitimate thing.
I think Newsom also wants attention because he wants to run in four years.
So he laid low, didn't want to get in the way, and I think you're going to see him as well as Michelle Obama getting a higher and higher profile.
Texas Nationalists wish to take the Lone Star State out of the Union and to create a fully independent country.
The group is now calling it Texit.
I remember, I don't know if they started it first or if I started it first.
I'd never heard anybody call it that.
But I remember when they were doing Brexit, and I did a report on Bojo, right?
Boris Johnson.
And at the time, he ran for election in support of Brexit.
And then, of course, you know, he flipped and we all found out that he was a globalist anyway.
But he had about 10 points.
And he was talking about things like, look, we give way more money to the EU than they give us back in return.
And they told us that we can't do this and we can't do that with our own natural resources.
And I went down the list and I compared it.
To what the federal government did to Texas at the time.
And I said, we got way more reason.
Orders of magnitude, more reason.
Terms of regulation, money, you name it.
We got orders of magnitude, more reasons to leave Washington than Britain had to leave the EU. I mean, they were telling Britain they couldn't fish in waters that they had fished in for millennia, you know, right off the coast.
So, anyway, I called it, the report was called Texit, but that's a good name for it, and we need to all think about whether or not we leave We can basically nullify them, and I think that's the key thing that we should all focus on.
Joshua Blank, research director for the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas, Austin, told Newsweek, he said, I think history has made it clear that there is no plausible scenario in which Texas could peacefully extract itself from the United States.
So I guess we can forget the whole idea of the Declaration of Independence, right?
I guess we could stop celebrating the Fourth of July.
I guess we should stop talking about self-government, because all of those things are part of it.
But of course, they were all denied by Abraham Lincoln.
And what he created was a centralized empire.
Lincoln crossed the Rubicon, and we went from a republic to an empire.
And we have an empire that will use tyrannical force to any opposition, and that's not just foreign.
They will do that domestically.
So I mention that because I think we need to be wise.
You know, we need to figure out how we're going to get them out of our lives, but we have to do it in a way that is going to be effective.
And in a way that does not give them an excuse to attack us.
Anonymous left a couple of tips and comments.
Thank you very much.
It says, Socialist government in British Columbia is proposing 36-hour minimum wage.
$36 per hour minimum wage.
Wait a minute.
Is that the work week?
36-hour work week?
No, this is $36 an hour minimum wage.
It'll destroy British Columbia.
A friend went to Ghana on family business thinking of moving back, and it's booming.
Russian friend wants to return home.
Yeah, it is crazy what is happening.
These policies that are being enacted against us are not just stupid.
They are intended to destroy.
He also says, I work remotely in IT. First time I've ever thought of leaving Canada.
This place is turning into Greece.
Bloated government, everyone on the take.
Government projects that drag on for years and cost a fortune.
And a third comment here.
American bullying, regime changing, invasions, sanctions, confiscations, kicked off de-dollarization in BRICS. Trump's solution is to threaten and bully countries into using the dollar.
That's it, right?
Yeah, more of the same.
Right?
Biden is a bully.
Always has been.
He's a thug.
He's a criminal.
He's part of a criminal cartel.
And Trump is the same.
You know, we've been delivered from one evil, and God is testing us with another form.
We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back when we talk a little bit about pharmaceutical stuff.
We'll be right back.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
Common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, speaking of Canada, they have supposedly detected their first presumptive case of H5 bird flu in a person, a teenager at this point in time.
And I looked at one article after another, and there was no information at all about what the symptoms were.
He said it's a teenager in a hospital, and he's contracted test positive for bird flu.
Well, did they test him after he got into the hospital?
Did they use a PCR test?
Did they amp it up to an absurd level?
We don't know exactly what happened.
Does he have pink eye?
Does he have fever?
Does he have any respiratory issues?
On what basis do they even call it flu?
Well, there is no information.
Instead, we just keep hearing it's jumped to humans now.
And again, the only thing I could find in any of these articles was the fact that they were saying, well, you know, in Canada, there haven't been any cases with dairy cattle yet at all.
And again, isn't that the biggest red flag that the first thing they would talk about with bird flu is dairy cattle?
You and I know that this is about demonizing raw milk.
And that is ultimately about something else as well.
That's about shutting down independent farms.
That's about making sure that we can't get our food locally.
That we have to have everything approved by the federal government.
Why should we have to get our food approved?
By the federal government.
We have safety inspections can be done of restaurants, even of farms at the state and local level.
And of course we've seen tyranny at the state and local level as well.
You look at the Amish farmer that's being attacked.
That's being done by the state of Pennsylvania.
So even taking it out of Washington is no guarantee that it's going to be legitimate.
But the war is on the local farm.
And the war is to make sure that you can't grow your own food, ultimately.
They want to come after...
In the UK, they're registering backyard birds.
They don't want you to have chickens to have eggs.
They don't want even that to be allowed.
It's absolutely amazing, the tyranny that is coming.
And, you know, I saw an old video, maybe about 25, 30 years old, of Thomas Sowell.
And he said, here's three questions for the left.
That will shut down most of the stuff that they want to do.
And, of course, it also applies for, you know, anybody who is in government, whichever side they are, left or right, when they want to do something.
And so the first thing when they tell you to do something or tell you that there's a problem, first thing you say is, compared to what?
Compared to what?
The number two thing is, at what cost are we going to fix this supposed problem?
And the third thing is, what's the hard evidence that you've got?
And see, that should be our response to all of this stuff.
And yet, they are laying this foundation.
And at the same time that Trump is saying, well, I'm going to have a, you know, offering hope for people that he's changed from 2020, the hope of RFK Jr., that things have changed.
At the same time, he's got Robert Redfield out there Who is, while he's telling everybody that bird flu is going to make the leap and we're going to have 25 to 50% casualties, he knows that.
He's like, oh really?
You got any hard evidence for that?
And yet, because he said nice things about RFK Jr., RFK Jr.
backed off of him.
And, you know, Trump may pull him back in.
Who knows?
Who knows what he's going to do?
And, of course, they're also pushing monkeypox.
And so the question is now, you know, I guess there's maybe some gaming markets.
You know, you can bet on politicians as to which one's going to win.
I guess you can vote on whether they're going to try to pull a fast one on us using monkeypox or bird flu.
Which one do you think they're going to do?
Meanwhile, a leaked memo in Germany from September the 28th, 2020.
This was, quote, an approval of the mRNA vaccine by the FDA before the U.S. elections.
It's not desirable, says the document.
The same holds true for European authorities.
And so they got this.
Again, this is September 28th, just before the 2020 elections.
And we knew this.
We knew they politicized this.
I've talked many times about how they waited.
You know, we had the election on Tuesday.
And then there was, oh, we got to count all the votes.
We got problems counting it and so forth.
And then finally, on Saturday, the media anointed Biden as the winner.
And the very next day, 60 Minutes, CBS's 60 Minutes, had in the can a puff piece about how the military was going to deliver the Operation Warp Speed vaccines as soon as they got approval.
And then that was Sunday night.
Monday morning, Pfizer says, we're done.
We've finished our approval process.
Well, this memo from September 28th, Says that they already had approval of the mRNA vaccine and they were waiting until after the election to put this out.
They said this citation reveals that it was all about politics and it was never about health.
But it was more important for them that Biden would win the U.S. presidential election.
Well, I don't even think that was a true objective.
I think that, just as the listener said earlier, I think it was a planned left-right, left-right type of march towards tyranny.
You have Trump, and then you have him followed by Biden.
Now you've got Trump again.
I think that's precisely what was happening.
And, of course, it's worse than this.
I mean, we could go back to October 2019, where Fauci is at the Milken Institute, and he says, how do we get everybody to take an untested flu shot that's radically different?
Well, we do it with chaos from the inside, and we do it iteratively.
And we can go back and we look at how they had set this thing up years ago.
They had it there waiting in the wings.
Everything about this was concocted.
We should never forget the people who have been injured with this.
This is an article on Children's Health Defense.
Former triathlete fighting the biggest battle in my life after COVID vaccine injuries.
In 2021, His last name is Sepp, Heiko Sepp, I think is the way you pronounce his first name.
He was a world-class extreme triathlete and a medalist in several international competitions.
He was in peak physical condition, but then all that changed after he got two COVID-19 shots in the summer and fall of 2021.
And this is the Trump shot.
Give him the credit.
He wants the credit for it.
He had no history of health problems, and certainly no history of heart problems.
But after he got the shots, he was diagnosed with pericarditis.
It was linked to vaccination.
He subsequently experienced severe and debilitating autoimmune reactions.
He said, it's been over two and a half years, and it has started to totally destroy me inside, he said.
I've been suffering a lot.
All day I'm full of pain.
In the last two and a half years, we've basically lost everything.
It is the biggest battle in my life, and I'm still fighting.
So is he getting any help in Norway where he lives?
No, they have acknowledged that he's got some vaccine injuries, and they've offered him $140.
They destroyed this man's life.
There is no permanent and significant injury, they said, even though he's got pericarditis.
There is no basis to claim that the vaccine can cause conditions such as fatigue, tiredness, or general pain lasting beyond four to six weeks.
Such conditions occur frequently in the general population.
They can be due to many factors.
Isn't that amazing?
And they offered him $140 for vaccine-induced pericarditis.
That wouldn't even pay for his sedatives for the operation.
You know, Franklin Graham was pushing the vaccine.
He had to have an operation for pericarditis that's outside the perimeter of the heart.
And once that happens, they have to remove that lining.
If they don't, it can constrict the heart and stop it from beating.
It's a very serious condition.
But, you know, even after he had pericarditis, either Franklin Graham is totally clueless as to what's going on, or he refuses to tell people.
It's just like Samaritan Ministries set up that New York City site, and then nobody showed up.
There wasn't any pandemic, and he knew it.
It just quietly packed up and went away.
And he quietly has his pericarditis operation, and then doesn't talk about it anymore.
Peter McCullough is urging Trump to pull dangerous COVID shots from the market, citing injuries and deaths.
Well, you can dream on about that.
I reported earlier that Susie Wiles won't even let him get close to Trump because she's tied in as a pharmaceutical lobbyist.
He called the shots, he called them both unnecessary and dangerous.
But that's Trump's greatest achievement, he believes.
And he's never going to admit that it is an ineffective quote-unquote vaccine and that it is full-on poison.
He will never admit that.
So we have the VAERS database system is loaded up with stuff, but they don't care about that.
You know, just like you look at this guy whose life was destroyed.
I know I've asked a lot of people to pray for Whistler and give you an update.
He's not in constant pain anymore.
He's able to stand and walk short distances, but if he tries to even walk up a single flight of steps, it still causes him a great deal of pain in his knee and other joints, and he has to get back in bed to try to get rid of that.
So it's been months.
He was in constant pain for a while, and this is just...
This is not the vaccine.
This is an antibiotic, a so-called antibiotic.
Fluorochloroquine and Cipro and all these different derivatives of it, the Phloxan family.
The government knows about it.
They won't take it off.
And we see the same type of thing with these other poisons that they put out.
Even though they will put warning labels on them, even though they will give them a red flag designation, they don't tell anybody that it's got a red flag designation.
Here's a good example of this.
a vaccine that was quietly pulled off the market in 2007 now linked to 19 diseases 35 million babies who got the shot are now at risk as adults This is a Pfizer vaccine.
Actually, it was put out by a company that was called Wyeth.
They've now been bought by Pfizer.
And they had been criticized because they had been putting out a vaccine that had thimerosal in it, which is mercury.
And I remember going to an optometrist and he said, well, you try soft contact lenses.
And I said, oh, I tried those things, you know, back in the 80s.
And You know, I would – the stuff that I would use to sterilize them would just turn my eyes blood red.
I guess people thought I had bird flu, you know.
The only symptom of bird flu that's been found in humans yet is red eyes.
But it was – and he says, oh, no.
He said, that was – The eye drops that we had at the time, they had thimerosal in them.
He goes, that's mercury.
You're putting mercury in your eyes.
I was like, well, why would they do that?
Well, because it kills living things.
I was like, yeah, well, I'm a living thing.
Same logic as this fluorochloroquine.
Let's kill the living bacteria, and let's kill your body as well.
And so I knew that I could see that, but you can't see it if you inject it, right?
And so people had figured that out about the mercury, so they came out with a thimerosal-free version of this.
They're called HIV vaccines.
Hemophilous influenza type B. And so it said this attacks a bacteria that can cause illness ranging from ear infections to pneumonia to meningitis.
The CDC recommended that for infants at the age of two months, but even after they got the mercury out, they have had horrendous results from this mercury-free version.
Wyeth is now Pfizer, and they sold this vaccine from the time it was licensed in 1990 until 2007.
In 2003, the company reformulated the vaccine to remove thimerosal, a type of mercury, after public outcry of the dangers of mercury in vaccines.
And then in 2007, Pfizer quietly pulled the reformulated vaccine off the market.
Brian Hooker at Children's Health Defense said this was concerning in light of the vaccine's relationship to many adverse events in children.
Researchers identified medical conditions for infants vaccinated with any HIV vaccine within 30 days of the shot.
Medicaid data revealed 19 different diagnoses.
None of them were serious or even life-threatening conditions identified were listed as possible adverse events on the package insert for HIV titer.
Again, even after they know, they won't tell you.
You know, it used to be, first, do no harm.
Well, now it's not even last, do no harm.
The concern about harm is not even on the list.
And then this is a bit of hopeful news.
We had a little bit.
A judge has denied AstraZeneca's motion to dismiss in a vaccine injury case.
What had happened was during the U.S. trials, and of course AstraZeneca was never given approval because it's political and it's a U.K. vaccine.
So they went with the American, they went with Johnson& Johnson, which subsequently they pulled off, Moderna and Pfizer.
But as part of the clinical trials, this woman agreed to be experimented on.
And she was severely injured.
And then AstraZeneca said, we're not going to give you any compensation for it.
The problem is, is that in the contract that she signed, she said in the contract that AstraZeneca would pay for any medical care that resulted from injury due to the vaccine trial.
So to get out of that, they said, ah, but this happened as part of the PrEP Act.
So we have no liability about anything.
And the judge said, oh yes you do.
Yes you do have it.
If you're going to lie to people about this, the PREP Act did not immunize you against deceptive contractual inducement and illusory promises.
It only immunized you against killing people with the poison.
But hey, if somebody survives and you said that you were going to give them medical care for that, then you still have to do that.
That's a step in the right direction.
The key thing is, we've got to reverse these things.
And you know, both the PrEP Act as well as the Childhood Vaccination Immunity were done under Republican presidents.
Thank you for listening.
The Common Man The Common Man They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.