Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 17, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:48

The David Knight Show - 09/17/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds lines.
	you You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday the 17th of September.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at a very, very dangerous precedent that came out of Austria.
	A woman found guilty of infecting her neighbor.
	And we're going to talk about the details of this case.
	It's even more unbelievable when you look at the details of the case.
	But they're moving forward on all these MacGuffins.
	While everybody is chasing theories about shooters and all the rest of this stuff, we're not going to go there today.
	I don't really care.
	about the presidential election.
	The only reason I talk about it is to get you to understand that you're not going to have any effect on it.
	They're not going to do anything to save us.
	We've got to stop this stuff in its tracks.
	We've got to expose the frauds of the pandemics and all the rest of this stuff.
	And we've got to take action from the grassroots up, from our families up.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	An Austrian woman has been found guilty of fatally infecting her neighbor with COVID-19.
	Bye.
	Yeah, this is Austria.
	The Gesundheitfuhrers.
	One of the worst places during all this stuff, of course, you know, going back to their Germanic instinct for authoritarian purposes.
	I mean, when you go back and you look at the Gesundheitfuhrers, the kindergarten, all the other things, jailing people for homeschooling, separating their families.
	That's why I say we've got a Christian homeschooling family that had to flee to America because the German government wanted to get them.
	A woman in Austria found guilty of fatally infecting her neighbor with COVID-19 in 2021.
	None of this is true.
	Take a look at the details here.
	Her neighbor died with a PCR test.
	She had cancer.
	She had pneumonia from the cancer.
	Oh, but it was pneumonia.
	Anyway, her second pandemic-related conviction in a year.
	They're basically trying to make this woman into a typhoid Mary.
	Which in itself was a lie.
	That was a lie to start with in the first place.
	A judge sentenced the 54 year old on Thursday to four months suspended imprisonment and an 800 euro fine.
	That's about $886 for grossly negligent homicide.
	Even though this is utter nonsense, it's a harbinger of what's going to come and they're going to use this in the coming germ games when they do another germ game on us.
	Well, we have put people in jail for killing.
	It's not just, you know, remember that was a key part of it.
	That was a key part of what the professing Christian leaders, I don't know if they're Christian or not, they profess to be Christians, but they were saying, gotta love your neighbor, gotta get that shot.
	No, I love my neighbor by telling them the truth.
	I love my neighbor by telling them to not inject themselves with poison.
	Or to take it orally by mouth with an antibiotic.
	The victim was a cancer patient, but she died of coronavirus, they said.
	Died with a PCR test.
	A virological report showed, and listen to this, this is the basis of this.
	A virological report showed that the virus DNA, the virus DNA, matched both the deceased and the 54-year-old woman.
	Who are you kidding here?
	They haven't isolated this thing, but they say that, oh, we got the same.
	Well, didn't everybody who supposedly had COVID have the same DNA virus, same virus DNA.
	You mean it was a different virus or different people?
	We are so far away from reality, folks.
	I don't even know how to relate to these people anymore.
	You've got the unicorn fart people out there saying, the oceans are rising over here, it's this high, over there on the other side of the world it's this high, and the western side of the Pacific Ocean is higher than the eastern side.
	It's like, really?
	Really?
	I'd like to see that myself.
	I'd like to have an explanation for that.
	Are you kidding me?
	It couldn't be that something that you're measuring somewhere else is sinking No, no, the ocean is much deeper on the one side than it is on the other side.
	It's higher.
	These people are crazy.
	We've got, we isolated the virus DNA.
	You haven't even isolated the virus, as we've pointed out over and over again.
	It's caused many people, including me, to change their minds about the fact that there is even such a thing as viruses and virology.
	When they said, over 200 places, as, do you have an isolation of the COVID-19?
	No, we don't have.
	Finally, some of them started explaining, we never do that.
	We never do that.
	We have a computer model.
	And then we send that sequence around.
	We have them test it with a PCR test, and they blow it up by a factor of 1.1 trillion, and you can find anything you want to anywhere in the world, but not in sufficient quantity to ensure that the person is sick.
	Of course, you can tell by looking at them if they're sick.
	Put your PCR meter down.
	The guy who invented it says you can't use it to diagnose for diseases because you can ramp it up as they're doing.
	So the virus DNA matched both the deceased and the 54-year-old woman, proving the defendant almost 100%, they said, transmitted it, said, an expert to the court.
	An expert.
	The judge said, I feel sorry for you personally.
	I think that something like this has probably happened hundreds of times.
	But you have to be made an example of.
	He didn't say that.
	But you are unlucky that an expert has determined with almost absolute certainty that it was an infection that came from you.
	Sieg Heil!
	Right?
	It's Nazis.
	Never changes what the German people does it.
	Unbelievable.
	What is that's the DNA of these people.
	It's just it's the culture of these people.
	The woman was convicted of a COVID related offense last summer.
	The agency said she was sentenced to three months suspended imprisonment for intentionally endangering people through communicable diseases.
	Again, this is the precedent that they're going to use against people, that they're going to threaten people with in the next germ gang.
	She was acquitted on the grossly negligent homicide charge at that time, but this time they've added the grossly negligent homicide charge.
	This week, the judge heard statements from the deceased family, the deceased family members, who said, they said, there had been contact in the stairwell between the neighbors on December the 21st, 2001.
	That was it.
	That was it.
	When the defendant would have already known that she had COVID-19, but the defendant denied that they came in contact in the stairwell.
	She said, I was too sick to get out of bed that day.
	She also said that she believed that she had bronchitis, which she typically gets every year.
	And typically every year we had this same scam run on the flu shots.
	Oh, we got cases here.
	This one's going to be really deadly.
	You don't need to get just shots.
	It could, uh, it's, it's not just for you.
	It's for everybody else, right?
	You got it.
	Your vaccine doesn't protect you.
	It protects other people.
	So yeah, we've seen that same thing over and over and over again, every year, just like this lady got bronchitis every year, but this year they weaponize it with a PCR test.
	The PCR test is the linchpin.
	of this fraudulent science.
	It gives the veneer of being able to make measurements, which you have to have if you're going to do real science.
	And if we understand that the measurements are total BS, then we understand there is absolutely no science with it.
	They haven't isolated anything.
	They're not testing for anything.
	None of this is real.
	It's just amazing to me that we live in this fantasy world.
	Everybody is so detached from reality.
	They can't or won't think for themselves.
	They go with experts.
	Well, the expert says that you did it.
	She's made of wood.
	Burn her, right?
	This is what's going on.
	You who are so wise in the ways of science.
	But the woman's doctor told police that the defendant had tested positive with a rapid test, a PCR test.
	And told him that she certainly won't let herself be locked... She said, I certainly won't let myself be locked up after the result.
	Yeah.
	How dare you?
	How dare you not let yourself be locked up after a PCR test?
	When you know that you've got bronchitis because you get it every year, but your doctor, your doctor, part of the germ game, tells a judge.
	Oh, well, I gave her a PCR test.
	And her PCR test said that she's an enemy to society.
	Well, the world economic forum says that COVID was a test.
	It absolutely was a test.
	This is a test of the emergency broadcasting system.
	The broadcasters of your area in voluntary cooperation with federal state and local authorities.
	Yeah, they're all cooperating.
	Develop this system to keep you informed in the event of an emergency.
	If this had been an actual emergency, Yeah, they would have locked you in your room now at this point in time.
	If it had been an actual emergency, you would have been locked down, masked up, and injected.
	Well, the World Economic Forum says COVID was a test of public compliance to the globalist agenda.
	Yeah, it's a partnership with the broadcasters and government and, you know, science.
	All of them together.
	For greater societal control.
	The World Economic Forum has acknowledged that the pandemic was a test orchestrated by globalists to assess public obedience to their agenda.
	This is from yournews.com.
	It's their comment, but I absolutely agree with it.
	On the World Economic Forum's My Carbon page, My Carbon, that's where they're pushing the other MacGuffin, right?
	They said the organization hinted at using the pandemic as a trial run for the new global order.
	Quote, this is from the World Economic Forum now.
	Quote, COVID-19 was a test of social responsibility.
	A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world.
	You're right.
	It was a test.
	And we have our own litmus test that we can apply for this.
	We have our own litmus test to see what our politicians did.
	What did your politician do in the US, in Canada, in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Austria, right?
	What did your politicians do?
	Exactly what the World Economic Forum and the UN and all these other globalist organizations, Bilderberg, you name it, what they wanted them to do.
	That's what they did.
	The COVID-19 germ game scam that was run on us by all of our politicians, whether it was Trump or Biden or any of them, that was a test of compliance of our politicians with the globalists.
	And, uh, they tested, unfortunately, a hundred percent positive, a hundred percent compliant.
	With a globalist agenda.
	Why do we care which one of these puppets is going to be used?
	They're going to select the puppet that will create the most chaos.
	They're going to select the person that can do the most damage to us.
	Whether it's going to be Trump, and he'll tell the conservatives, lay down and take it, and Alex Jones will tell everybody, it's 4D chess, don't worry, he's got it covered.
	The conservative people, all the conservative press, will make apologies and explanations.
	You'll be the big pacifier in everybody's mouth, no matter what the government does, just like what happened in 2020.
	Or you can go the other way, and you can have Lala installed, and she can ramp up all of this stuff by fiat.
	And the people are already angry because they believe that the election was stolen from them.
	And of course, you know, both sides are going to believe the election was stolen, regardless of what happens.
	Both sides are going to believe the election was stolen because nobody and the media is completely polarized.
	They have different polls.
	They have different spins.
	They have different perspectives.
	They don't address the other person's perspective and say, well, they say this is happening, but this is why that's not going to happen.
	No, no.
	It's just a fact.
	It's just a given that their person is going to win.
	And so they could ramp it up a la la.
	They could, you know, have her come on and she tries to do everything all at once with executive orders and all the rest of the stuff.
	And everybody is already setting their thing.
	This whole thing is garbage.
	The election was stolen.
	That could kick it off.
	Whatever.
	Who are, do they think, say, I don't know who they think is going to be the best person for chaos and control.
	But, um, that's what this is all about.
	Our politicians have been tested.
	They've been found to be fully compliant and the handwriting is on the wall.
	Many, many tickled parts of what you have been tested and you've been found wanting in the balance here.
	It is a litmus test to see what they can normalize.
	You know, Trump normalized so many things, you know, the stimulus check was a normalization of universal basic income.
	The lockdown was a normalization of the 15 minute city and on and on.
	The My Carbon page on the World Economic Forum also references the promotion of a 15-minute smart city as a solution to climate change.
	Of course, that was what the lockdown was for.
	Social distancing.
	Mask mandates, mass vaccinations, contact tracing, again, contact tracing, CBDC, ID, you know, measuring everything that you do, total surveillance, got to do it, got to do it.
	Vivek Ramaswamy jumped in to make money off of that side of it with this trader, Mike DeWine, the Republican governor in Ohio.
	Ramaswamy wanted to get on the contact tracing stuff.
	Make money off of that.
	That's why he joined the COVID team for Mike DeWine.
	Leo Homan on Substack said, uh, why was it okay to shop at big stores, but unsafe to support small businesses or to attend religious services?
	Well, we know why they chose the big box retailers over the small businesses, because Trump told us the small businesses were not essential.
	It was only the big wall street black, you know, big box stores that had the trade on wall street.
	They were essential, but you're not essential.
	He could have used more obvious language.
	I thought that was pretty obvious.
	That, that really triggered me, but the, you know, the, he could have just said, they're not stakeholders.
	Okay.
	They're not stakeholders.
	You're a small business.
	You mom and pop you main street businesses.
	You're not stakeholders.
	You're, you're not going to own anything.
	It's only the big multinational corporations and the politicians like Trump who are going to own things.
	So yeah, you're not essential.
	Then, of course, religious services.
	We know this is like everything.
	Fundamentally, a spiritual war.
	So, of course, it's going to come after that.
	Uneven restrictions led to confusion and widespread compliance.
	The World Economic Forum wanted to see how easily individuals would relinquish personal freedoms under the guise of public safety, and to make sure that they know these politicians are on their side, and if they're not, they can get rid of them.
	So yeah, go ahead, follow Trump when these conservatives like Alex Jones tell you that it's 4D chess.
	And of course these people will be conning the conservatives.
	It wouldn't have worked if Hillary had been there.
	They couldn't have conned the conservatives with Hillary.
	They would have pushed back.
	The liberals want all this stuff.
	The liberals wet their pants when anybody tells them that the world is going to end or there's a virus out there.
	They didn't need somebody.
	They didn't need a president that they could trust.
	They'd do it anyway.
	They did it even though Trump was telling them to do it.
	But the conservatives needed to have their devotion to Trump.
	They needed to be told that I know it looks like he's a part of the globalist.
	I know it looks like a betrayal.
	I know what he's doing is not constitutional, but trust me and trust him.
	It's 4D chess, said Alex Jones.
	They wanted to find out how many of us would prove our servitude to the lawless, fascistic beast system.
	That's what it is, the beast system.
	The Antichrist system.
	And now they're wrapping themselves in all this religious rhetoric as they go around with their reawakened doors and all the rest of this stuff.
	Okay.
	By their fruit, you'll know them.
	Complying with unimaginable restrictions.
	They wanted to see who was on which side.
	Well, they know which side I'm on!
	I didn't make any secret out of it.
	I can't even post Christmas songs on YouTube.
	Shadowband on Twitter, while some of the big cons of conservatism are now celebrated and promoted and all the rest of that stuff.
	It truly is amazing how this whole thing has shaken out.
	Now we've got the CDC.
	Issuing fresh bird flu warnings after a Missouri man supposedly contracted the first case of bird flu without being exposed to an animal.
	No, he wasn't exposed to an animal.
	Um, he was exposed to a bogus PCR test.
	This is a test of the emergency broadcasting system.
	That's what's going on here with this thing.
	Okay, so they'll tell you what to do.
	Just stay tuned to the media.
	The media will tell you what to fear.
	The media will tell you what to do, and they'll tell you when to do it.
	Now go to your shelter, lock the door, put your mask on.
	Over the course of roughly several years at this point, well over 100 million poultry birds have been killed.
	They want to starve us to death with Gates Lab meat.
	And they're doing it to all kinds.
	I covered the story in New Zealand where they went in and there weren't any sick bees and none of it, but they found some spores somewhere.
	And then they killed millions of dollars worth of bees from this guy in New Zealand.
	He said the bees weren't even exposed to this.
	They found some spores on some of the hive boxes out there.
	Instead of destroying the hive boxes, they destroyed his farm.
	Or a large part of it.
	He was a very big producer.
	Because they make a lot of money creating Manuka honey as medicinal value out of New Zealand.
	That's what you need to take instead of these antibiotics.
	You get sick.
	The latest reported case of bird flu has once again prompted fears that bird flu could very soon evolve into a full-blown Germ game.
	That's what it is.
	It's not a pandemic.
	It's a germ game.
	Uh, although this is mainstream media here, they go to a professor of infectious diseases at Georgetown university.
	Of course, although human cases have so far been relatively mild, the threat of a germ game is real.
	And he's calling for vaccine development, stockpiling and deployment, because that's the only solution to anything.
	Vaccines.
	The only solution allowed.
	Now, you know, he says human cases so far have been relatively mild.
	Yeah, they had no fever.
	They had no respiratory issues, but they had bird flu.
	No, they had pinkeye.
	They had pinkeye.
	This one is pinkeye.
	One of the most common things out there.
	You get something in your eye.
	When has that been diagnosed as flu?
	These people are laughably dangerous.
	Laughably dangerous.
	We can laugh at them, but they're very dangerous.
	Former Trump CDC director, Robert Redfield has publicly warned a number of times.
	He keeps shouting it from the roof that bird flu is going to kill 25 to 50% of the people.
	Well, these people haven't even, these bird flu people haven't been sick at all.
	This guy is an absolute liar.
	He's every bit as bad as Fauci.
	Of course, you know, he also got a medal just like Fauci from Trump on Trump's last day.
	Trump didn't pardon the J six people.
	He gave Fauci and Redfield and Burke's medals.
	Can't figure that out.
	Can you guys on the MAGA cult?
	Can you, you can't figure that out.
	You're so stupid, stupid.
	Uh, at this point, you're not ignorant.
	You're stupid.
	You can't connect the dots.
	You won't connect the dots.
	You are such a cult.
	I can't stand it.
	I look at Laura Loomer and the rest of this.
	She is the perfect combination of MAGA and Donald Trump in one person.
	And literally certifiably insane.
	I've called her Laura Looney for a long time.
	She is certified.
	Her family, she's got like a brothers committed for life.
	Um, it's just absolutely amazing.
	I'm not going to go into it, but if you want to know a deep dive, take a look at what Milo put up about her.
	I always have known that.
	And of course, she's got connections with people who want to keep... they don't care about you and I. They don't care about issues.
	They don't care about getting things done.
	We've seen this with congressional races.
	The guy that Trump came after, Forget his name, but he was head of the Freedom Caucus, I think, and he was in the Freedom Caucus.
	I think he was the head of the Freedom Caucus.
	But because he endorsed DeSantis, Trump's going to get even with him.
	Threw him out, so now we don't have somebody who's committed conservative on the issues there.
	He later endorsed Trump.
	When DeSantis dropped out, he endorsed Trump, but that's not allowed.
	No, no, no.
	We're going to have a civil war within the GOP and everywhere else with Trump because you either bow the knee to that narcissist or he's going to come after you and get even.
	And then, uh, it wasn't that nicely was, um, uh, opposed to Trump.
	That's the one thing we disagreed on.
	But, uh, they used Laura Loomer to come after nicely in the early days.
	Say, look at this.
	He's anti-Trump.
	And that was the beginning of that.
	Now, the guy they put in, a nominal Republican, is somebody who got all this money from hardcore, radical left billionaires out of Aspen Institute and other places like that.
	Unbelievable amount of money in this small, local, state race.
	And guess who kicked it all off?
	Laura Loomer.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Pretty amazing.
	Back to bird flu.
	The headlines that you see now being put out just constantly.
	This is from Winepress News.
	He put all these headlines together.
	And it is truly amazing to see how they're pumping this stuff.
	Bird flu is quietly getting scarier.
	Perhaps it's time to talk about a bird flu pandemic, says The Atlantic.
	Then Wired Magazine says the bird flu outbreak takes a mysterious turn.
	It's like, yeah, you can't see it.
	It's everywhere.
	We can't see it.
	We can't test it.
	But it's everywhere.
	We know it's going to kill 25% to 50% of us.
	Will bird flu be the next pandemic?
	Vaccines are prepped, just in case, says USA Today.
	Axios, the Cuyahoga County Fair vet is monitoring the bird flu situation.
	Well, there you go.
	Boy, they're going to go everywhere to find the news of this.
	Reminds me of the 70s when, uh, uh, you know, local news, I never really paid much attention to local news because there's all sports and weather and crime fear.
	And they would go everywhere.
	They would, you know, whenever there was, if it bleeds, it leads.
	If there was some violent crime anywhere in the United States where they'd talk about it.
	And it got my sister who had watched that.
	She was like 10 years older than me.
	She'd watch the news.
	It got her so afraid.
	You know, constant murders and rapes and all this other kind of stuff all over the country.
	And it would be reported to the local news as if it had happened locally.
	And they internalized it.
	Axios is going to go to the Cuyahoga County Fair to tell you, not that there's bird flu there, but they're looking for it.
	Be careful.
	We don't look out.
	Or a bird flu telegraph in the UK and threat of a bird flu pandemic is rising.
	But experts say the risk remains low.
	Are they right?
	You know, the experts, this is one thing the experts could be wrong about.
	Maybe they're not getting you afraid enough.
	So that's our role.
	Yeah, it's absolutely their role.
	Uh, when they look at all this stuff, yeah, that's the media.
	Yeah, bird flu cases are going undetected, new study suggests.
	And it's a problem for all of us, says CNN.
	It's everywhere.
	You can't see it.
	You don't know if experts are telling us not to worry about it.
	They're not right.
	The media is hyping, hyping, hyping.
	And then finally, Cats in the U.S.
	are contracting bird flu.
	What pet parents need to know, says Pet Helpful.
	And then they telegraph, indoor house cats have died of bird flu.
	How did they get it?
	You know, we need to be pushing back harder on this than the mainstream media is pushing back on the barbecued Haitian, the Haitian barbecues of cats in Ohio.
	We need to be pushing back against this kind of stuff.
	It is absolutely insane to see that they're doing this and that they're getting away with it.
	So if you get bird flu, can you get cat scratch fever to counteract it?
	Will that take out the bird flu?
	I don't know.
	You have to ask Ted Nugent.
	I don't know.
	He wrote songs about that.
	Now you can scare people with that.
	Yeah, you need Ted to get rid of the feral hogs in Texas.
	That's what he's all about.
	Just how deadly is bird flu to humans, says Slate.
	And the interesting thing about this is that They're kind of looking at this with a skeptical eye.
	This is a left-wing mainstream media publication.
	Now, they do say, well, you know, we still have to be very watchful.
	And making unknowns about the illness more urgent, they said, because of this case in Missouri.
	But just how deadly is it?
	They said the virus, which is currently sweeping through U.S.
	dairy herds.
	No, it's not.
	No, it's not sweeping through the news.
	Rarely jumps to human beings, but when it does, the consequences can be great.
	But I think, you know, if it's all over the dairy herds, we need to call it the milk flu or the meat flu or the cow flu.
	Or we could call it Buffalo wings or something.
	You know, I don't, what?
	This is absolute nonsense.
	And it's just, they're going to use it for whatever their agenda is.
	They want to attack the food supply chickens first, then meat and dairy.
	So we've had quite a few supposed cases, so how many of these people have died?
	Well, none of them.
	None of them.
	But the WHO reports that 52% of the people known to be infected have died from the disease.
	Folks, this is an absolute lie.
	An absolute lie.
	Coming from the World Health Organization.
	That does it all the time.
	Gets away with it all the time.
	Has the media on their side, typically.
	But in this particular case, Slate says, they look at this skeptically.
	They say, well, this figure has been widely cited in academic papers.
	It's been repeated over and over again by Robert Redfield, hasn't it?
	25 to 50 percent of the people are going to die.
	It's been widely circulated in academic papers.
	It's an echo chamber, folks.
	With public health communications, with media reports, where it can provoke apocalyptic visions.
	Quote, bird flu pandemic could be 100 times worse than COVID.
	Claimed one New York Post headline.
	New York Post.
	This is New York Post, not the New York Times.
	This is the New York Post Republican, um, you know, Murdoch family.
	Okay.
	It doesn't matter if you listen to Fox news or CNN with all this stuff.
	It doesn't matter if you read the New York Times, the New York Post.
	It is, both of them have sold, both of them are the globalist uni-party.
	They will have fights over issues like abortion, things like that, to, so they can continue through their agenda to establish the kind of global slavery that they want to do.
	And these other issues matter.
	You know, issues like abortion and gun control, they do matter.
	Absolutely do matter.
	But they'll betray us on those as well.
	As we saw with Trump.
	Once they get in.
	They'll use them as campaign issues.
	They'll use them as wedge issues to get elected.
	And then they'll betray us on those once they get in.
	Bird flu could be 100 times worse than COVID, said the New York Post.
	An article in the Guardian leads with the WHO's enormous concern about the spread of bird flu, which according to one lead scientist, quoted, has, quote, an extraordinarily high human mortality rate.
	Not a single person dead.
	They've stretched and inflated this to imagine that they've got cases and not a single person is even sick, let alone dead.
	So Slate says the actual picture is more complicated, although it's still alarming.
	It's still alarming.
	They got to kowtow to the emperor without clothes.
	Nice suit you're wearing there.
	Um, but you know, there's other things that are happening here.
	The WHO's mortality figure says Slate an average of wildly different death rates from past outbreaks doesn't factor in mild cases that went undetected.
	Detected how?
	By PCR.
	Detected, even the ones that are detected are mild.
	Nobody's sick.
	It's not happening.
	So when and where researchers look for cases can heavily bias the case fatality rate.
	A virus, and I'll say, I'll put air quotes around a virus, because I don't believe in this stuff anymore.
	Sorry.
	After people have asked them for their science and they can't produce it, Won't produce it.
	Tell us how they quote unquote do the science to identify the viruses.
	They can go pound sand as far as I'm concerned.
	That produces mild undetected infections.
	If you had a virus that produced mild undetected infections in 998 people and sends two people to the hospital and then kills one of those hospitalized patients.
	Well, as far as the public health system is concerned, You had a case fatality rate of 50%.
	But if they had detected all the people that had a quote-unquote virus and didn't even do anything to them, the true fatality rate would have been one person out of a thousand, or 0.1%.
	But they put it in as 50%.
	You don't have to think too much.
	To see the flaws even if you stay within their paradigm of viruses.
	Even if you stay within their paradigm of cases.
	Even if you believe that the PCR test worked.
	You don't have to, you know, going even with those assumptions.
	The fraud, the lies were obvious from the very beginning.
	You don't even have to push back.
	And that's one of the reasons why I really didn't look at it much because of it.
	Well, we don't need to challenge the paradigm.
	Let's just challenge their illogical conclusions, unsubstantiated conclusions, unproven conclusions within the paradigm of viruses and pandemics.
	And that was easily done.
	And now it's time for us to go after the very foundation of this stuff.
	Because, unfortunately, people are still being gaslit by this whole thing.
	So, there's also a misguided buzz about mosquitoes.
	Why would that be the case?
	Do you remember when Fauci was saying that AIDS was caused by a virus, HIV?
	And you remember, he was using the PCR test.
	And you remember, Carey Mullis, who invented the PCR test, said, you can't prove that.
	With my test.
	If AIDS is caused by a virus, HIV, and he says, I'm not saying it's not.
	I'm just saying that there's no way that you can prove it using the PCR test.
	And yet that was the foundation of what Fauci was using.
	So there were a lot of people out there who said it's not being caused by a virus.
	It's not something that is being spread.
	Everybody believed at the time, well, if it's a virus, then it would be logical.
	If you think within that paradigm, Of viruses, and pandemics, and HIV, a virus causing AIDS, well within that paradigm, it was perfectly logical to think that mosquitoes were going to transfer AIDS.
	Perfectly logical.
	Why wouldn't they?
	Right?
	And yet it didn't.
	And when we see, as the Bailey's point out in their book, the last pandemic, We see that the UK had a common cold center that they operated for 45 years, trying to figure out how the common cold was transmitted, trying to identify different strains of the common cold and all the rest of the stuff.
	They would bring people in to a well and they would have them hang around with people.
	And it was more than just passing somebody in the stairwell as they just, you know, trying to hang this woman in Austria for.
	No, they would have people hanging out all the time with each other.
	Have the people who are sick coughing and all the rest of the stuff.
	They would even take mucus from the sick person and put it in the mouth of these other people.
	Sorry about that, but yeah, they did that.
	And other things like that.
	They tried everything they could to pass the cold, and it didn't.
	And so after 45 years, they shut it down.
	Does that cast some doubt in your mind about what we've been told about contagion?
	When they can't even pass along the common cold that way?
	Sure does in my mind.
	And yet, as they're pushing the vaccine, as they're pushing bird flu, they're also pushing antibiotics.
	A super bug crisis that's going to kill nearly 40 million people by 2050.
	We're all going to die.
	We're going to die from, you know, and of course the people on the southwestern side of the Pacific are going to die before the people on the northeastern side of the Pacific.
	Because, um, you know, uh, ocean level is rising on that side of the Pacific, but not on the other side of the Pacific yet.
	But we're all going to die eventually with this stuff.
	Um, so a super bug crisis is coming on because of.
	Immunity to antibiotics.
	Now, why are they doing this?
	It's to get people very afraid, to get people to turn to vaccines.
	But it's the vaccines and it's the antibiotics that are killing people.
	They kill your body, the antibiotics, like these chloroquine family, the floxin family.
	Uh, they come after the antibiotic by attacking its DNA.
	But guess what?
	They attack your DNA as well.
	Uh, so, um, stay away from that garbage.
	Stay away from the media and stay away from these hair on fire, fear porn, news media, the mainstream media funded by government, just like these scientists, just like the scientists that tell everybody the world is melting and so forth.
	So, the World Health Organization says that driven by misuse and overuse of antimicrobial medications in humans, animals, and plants, pathogens could develop that are resistant to them.
	Look, that's one thing we can agree on, is the overuse of antibiotics.
	And they're putting them in the food supply, of course, by injecting the animals.
	And they put these floxins in the animals as well.
	This fluoride-based poison.
	Well, they're just coming back to Florida.
	If they can't get it to you in the water, they'll give it to you with the antibiotics or the meat that you eat and all that.
	So we've got to have new antibiotics and antibiotic stewardship.
	Stay away from them.
	Stay away from them.
	Criminal negligence of big pharma.
	This is an article from Brownstone Institute.
	Yeah, it's kind of interesting.
	You look at the FDA.
	I see the FDA like a Soros prosecutor in California.
	Letting murderers out, you know, you commit a murder.
	Okay.
	That's all right.
	We, we logged it.
	We captured you.
	Now you can go.
	They just keep letting them go.
	The FDA says, just like the source prosecutor, your FDA, you're free to do anything.
	They just keep letting this killers loose again.
	Brownstone Institute said is one of those conversations that you never forget.
	We were discussing of all things, the COVID injections.
	And I was questioning the early safe and effective claims.
	before by the pharmaceutical industry, I felt suspicious of how quickly we had arrived at that point of seeming consensus, despite a lack of long-term safety data.
	I do not trust the pharmaceutical industry, but my colleague did not agree, and I felt my eyes widened as he said, well, I don't think they'd do anything dodgy.
	What?
	Clearly, my colleague had not read the medical history books.
	This conversation slapped me out of my own ignorance that Big Pharma's rap sheet was well known.
	Even in the profession, the medical profession, it isn't.
	With this in mind, let's take a look at the history of the illegal, fraudulent dealings by players in the pharmaceutical industry who are overseen by the FDA.
	You're free to do anything.
	An industry that has way more power and influence than we give them credit for.
	How do they do it?
	TV ads.
	TV ads.
	All the major networks are bought and sold by these people.
	They own them.
	They are not going to criticize them.
	That's where the bulk of their revenue comes from.
	You know, last week or so, there was a thing where Glenn Beck goes on with Tucker Carlson.
	And this was after Russell Brand went on with Tucker Carlson.
	Now, I'm not their judge.
	I don't know what their heart is.
	There's no way for me to know what their heart is.
	But, you know, they are now all talking about God.
	They've all found God, they say.
	And so, Russell Brand was sitting cross-legged with his shoes off like a guru, like a yoga guru.
	And, you know, the reason I started watching it was because And somebody said, look at this, an hour and a half program, and they spent an hour, the two of them, talking about God.
	And it's like, well, I just couldn't get past the fluff of about 10 minutes of it, so I turned it off.
	But then he has on Glenn Beck.
	And guess what Glenn Beck does?
	Glenn Beck is this copycat chameleon.
	You know, first he used to copy anybody.
	He'll copy Alex Jones, he'll copy Russell Brand.
	So Glenn Beck takes his shoes off and sets yoga style on the same chair.
	And then Glenn Beck and Tucker Carlson.
	Again, I didn't watch it, I just read some comments to summarize it.
	Glenn Beck was talking about how evil Fox News was.
	And yet, the two of them worked there for the longest time, wouldn't tell people about pharmaceuticals, not at all.
	Tucker wouldn't do it even during the pandemic.
	Now maybe he's changed.
	I hope he has changed.
	I hope he has changed.
	I hope he has repented of his sins and confessed them to God, but he certainly hasn't confessed them to the public.
	Neither of them would.
	So, you know, do they confront the evil and get fired?
	You know, the interesting thing is, is that Matt Drudge, who is, you know, not trying to wrap himself in God talk, Uh, he actually confronted him that he knew that they would fire him back in the nineties because he showed that picture of baby Samuel, the baby that was being operated on before he was born.
	And he reached up with his tiny hand and wrapped it around the pinky of the surgeon.
	And he showed that on Fox news and they fired him.
	I thought, wow, that's pretty evil and good for Matt for having this conviction.
	And when I was able to talk to Matt face to face once, uh, I said, thank you for doing that.
	That made such a big difference to a lot of people.
	And I know somebody who wound up having that surgery for their baby.
	The baby had spina bifida, and they had that surgery before the baby was born because of that case and everything.
	He stopped me and goes, oh, I did that because I wanted to get out of my contract.
	He knew that Fox News would fire him.
	Guess what?
	Tucker knew they'd fire him if he opposed them on the vaccines.
	He knew that they would fire him if he opposed them on 9-11.
	Uh, Beck, the same, right?
	They'll go so far, but no further.
	Just like the people who will tow the line to stay on YouTube or whatever else.
	Same thing.
	I don't want to get demonetized.
	Yeah.
	There are many people working in this industry who have good intentions, says the author.
	Towards improving health care for patients, and of course that is true as well.
	We went into a local drugstore because we're trying to get some vitamins and minerals for my son.
	Trying to help him detox, trying to help him block the poison that was given to him cavalierly by a know-nothing doctor who gave him no warning, the pharmacist who gave him no warning.
	So we went to a different pharmacy, local pharmacy, and we walk in and it's two young women.
	About the age of my son, who was injured by these drugs, and troublingly, one of them had a mask on.
	But that's okay, I'm not asking for their medical advice, if they don't know anything.
	But she was like the pharmacist there.
	We were just asking them, you know, where can I find this thing, and I knew what I wanted, I wanted to buy it off the shelf.
	And they were really nice.
	And we told them what happened.
	She'd never heard of Floxans.
	She's not gonna warn anybody about the black box label.
	And while we're talking and looking around, she pulls up on the computer and she goes, oh my, oh no, you know, looking at what it does to people.
	And as we're checking out, the other girl says, These drugs are just so bad, I don't even want to look at the warnings anymore.
	You know, we can be that way.
	We can be that way about politics, we can be that way about the drugs, the poisons that they put out.
	I just don't want to know what could possibly go wrong.
	Well, you better pay attention.
	Better pay attention.
	It wasn't that we didn't want to know, that we got, you know, gaslighted, but, you know, should have done it, should have done it, should have known.
	But she doesn't want to know.
	But still, very nice girls, and the one who said she didn't want to know, so we'll pray for your son.
	So we look at this, and it's not enough to say that many people working in the industry have good intentions and want to help people.
	Because the industry is being run by demons.
	Literal demons are running the Pharmakeia.
	These are people who will commit mass murder across the planet, as we saw them do with the vaccines, as they've been doing for decades with the Floxans.
	They will commit mass murder and they will continue to do it because they want money.
	The love of money is the root of all evil.
	And these people will not repent of their murders.
	They just want to be the great men of the planet.
	The Pharmakia.
	A 2020 peer-reviewed article published by the Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA, outlines the extent of the problem.
	The group studied both the type of illegal activity and the financial penalties imposed on pharmaceutical companies between the years 2003 and 2016.
	This is the AMA's journal looking at the crimes of Big Pharma.
	What did it cost?
	Well, they're too big to fail, too big to jail.
	They own the politicians, they own the media.
	Of the companies included, 85% of them had received financial penalties for illegal activities with a total combined dollar value of $33 billion.
	And folks, that is a slap on the wrist.
	That's like giving a $2 billion penalty to HSBC because they laundered money for the Sinaloa cartel and other drug and terrorists.
	And did it knowingly.
	And did it over and over again.
	Not just one time.
	They got caught.
	They did some things to make the government think that they had changed, and then they did it again.
	And then Eric Holder of the Obama administration, the attorney general, said, oh, they're too big to jail.
	We'll give them another $2 billion fine.
	Well, they keep doing that all the time.
	You know, what if you go in and you rob a bank and you get a million dollars and they fine you $100,000?
	OK.
	Well, I guess I learned my lesson.
	No, you didn't.
	You learned you can get away with it.
	You learned that crime pays.
	And if you are a pharmaceutical company, crime and murder and permanently disabling people pays.
	Big money, big money.
	And you can pay off the politicians like Trump so that you can put your big pharmaceutical CEO in as head of the HHS.
	And you can put your pharmaceutical puppets in as head of the FDA.
	Two of them.
	Gottlieb and Hahn.
	So they can go back to Moderna and Pfizer.
	That's what Trump did.
	At Benedict Donald.
	The illegal activities included manufacturing, distributing adulterated drugs.
	Misleading marketing, failure to disclose negative information about a product, significant side effects, including death, bribing foreign officials, fraudulently delaying market entry of competitors, pricing and financial violations and kickbacks.
	And of course you can bribe president, Republican, Democrat, doesn't matter.
	Bribe Biden, bribe Trump.
	They're the same.
	Trump wants a death sentence for drug dealers.
	We should start with your pals that paid you off, Trump.
	Start with them.
	They kill more people than these drug cartels do.
	And when they're caught, like the opioid crisis, it was amazing to see the cases against the Sackler family and against Johnson & Johnson.
	Johnson & Johnson had played these marketing games just like the Sackler family had done.
	Uh, but they did it.
	The Sackler family did it far more extensively, but it was Johnson and Johnson who did the manufacturing of the opioids.
	And you had doctors getting people addicted to this stuff because they didn't know what they weren't out there looking for a thrill.
	They weren't out there sniffing glue or snorting cocaine because they wanted to get high.
	These are people who had pain issues and they're take this pill and they didn't know better and they got them addicted.
	Kill people.
	And so, what did the government do about that?
	To me, that is even more insidious.
	Somebody's out there looking for a high, it's like, okay, well, you know, they probably know what they're doing, or they should know what they're doing, but these people in hospitals, yeah, you should, now we know, you should be skeptical of anything and everything that the pharmaceutical companies give you, and you should look everything up.
	I did that with my cardiologist, and he said, oh, you been talking to Dr. Google?
	And I didn't say it to him, but I thought, one of us needs to.
	If you're not concerned about my health, I need to take charge of it.
	Last time I ever saw him.
	What a pathetic person he was.
	Yeah, again, you're doing the stint.
	I wish I had not done that either.
	Uh, you tell, Oh yeah, well, you know, you get this irritation in your, in your arteries and they start creating a blockage and everything.
	And so, um, what we do is we run this because it gets, uh, damaged, you know, gets, it gets damaged from cholesterol or something hitting the walls.
	And so what we're going to do is we're going to ram this thing up all your arteries, you know, from your leg up to your heart, we're going to ram this thing up there, but, and then put a stent in, we're going to fix it at that one spot.
	And then we're going to create thousands of other spots where the same thing can happen again.
	Well, I'm not going to be a repeat customer of these people.
	It's just so typical.
	So typical.
	Fix one problem and create a thousand more.
	The biggest overall fines have been paid by GlaxoSmithKline.
	Almost $10 billion.
	Pfizer was second at $3 billion.
	Johnson & Johnson at $2.5 billion.
	Other familiar names include AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck, Eli Lilly, where Trump goes to get his head of HHS.
	Sharing Plow, Sanofi, Aventis, Wyeth.
	It's a list.
	The big pharma players are all there.
	All repeat offenders.
	And you know, when we talk about the drugs, the plant is going to make them out the opioids.
	So they come after the Sackler family and Johnson & Johnson.
	And you've got state attorneys general all over the country.
	As part of this thing and they didn't come in and confiscate their wealth.
	They didn't do civil asset forfeiture like they did with El Chapo or like they do with a drug dealer.
	No, they were very deferential.
	They gave them due process and they even went to the negotiating table and said, well, how much can you afford to pay?
	And they got a, an amount from them and the Sackler family made out like bandits.
	They kept most of the money.
	They gave a pittance and penalties to these people.
	They wouldn't do that with a drug dealer.
	That's why I say the pharmaceutical companies are worse than the drug dealers who are allied with the CIA.
	Pharmaceutical companies allied with the FDA are worse than the drug dealers, international drug dealers, who are allied with the CIA running those drugs.
	Our government is so evil, unbelievably evil.
	Cases often drag on for years, making the avenue of justice and resolution inaccessible to all but the well-funded, the persistent, and the steadfast.
	If a case is won, pharma's usual response is to appeal to a higher court and to start the process all over again.
	One thing is clear, taking these giants to court requires nerves of steel, a willingness to surrender years of your life to the task, and very deep pockets.
	For every conviction, there are countless settlements.
	The company agreeing to pay out but making no admission of guilt.
	A notable example is a $35 million settlement made after 15 years of legal maneuvering by Pfizer in a Nigerian case that alleged the company had experimented on 200 children without their parents' knowledge or consent.
	Wow, they're racist.
	Did it to Nigerian kids?
	No, they're equal opportunity.
	They did it to everybody.
	They experimented on everybody during the warp speed Trump shots.
	Everybody was experimented on.
	Children, adults, elderly, everybody was experimented on.
	Everybody.
	So, um, yeah, it's the same type of thing when you would try to go after the mafia.
	One of the reasons that they started to go down this civil asset forfeiture thing.
	Was because the mafia was so well-funded they couldn't get any convictions.
	And so they said, well, let's confiscate their money first.
	So they came up with this nonsense of the RICO statute.
	Rudy Giuliani used that to make himself famous.
	Now it's been used against him.
	Funny how those things work out.
	Once you set up these precedents and these structures, they can turn around and be used against you.
	And so, you know, that eventually Morphed into the civil asset forfeiture.
	The trove of internal emails presented an evidence and a case about Vioxx, which was giving people, uh, heart issues goes back to the nineties.
	The trove of internal emails presented in that case, he says, revealed a more sinister level of operation.
	One of the emails circulated the pharma giants, us headquarters contained a list of problem physicians.
	That the company sought to neutralize or discredit.
	And we saw all of this played out in the warp speed stuff as well, didn't we?
	People who oppose, well, we're going to take your license.
	We're going to discredit you.
	You can't tell people that there's anything that's going to help them with a respiratory illness other than waiting for the shot or put them on a ventilator, kill them.
	If you do that, we'll take your medical license.
	We'll neutralize you.
	We'll discredit you.
	But this is back in the 90s.
	The recommendations to achieve these ends included payments for presentations, research and education, financial support of private practice, and strong recommendations to discredit.
	So what they would do is they would try to bribe these people, or they would bribe people who would discredit them.
	Same thing we see now.
	A lot of intimidation.
	This is Merck at this particular time, and the product was Vioxx that was killing people by heart disease.
	This alleged systematic intimidation was as extensive as it was effective.
	The result?
	Merck made over $2 billion per year in sales before Vioxx was finally pulled from the pharmacy shelves in 2004.
	In his testimony, Dr. Graham estimated that between 88,000 and 139,000 excess cases of heart attack or sudden cardiac death were caused by Vioxx in the U.S.
	alone before it was withdrawn.
	So they get to operate this thing for over a decade, making $2 billion a year.
	And they get a small slap on the wrist.
	They don't get the death penalty.
	Not these drug dealers.
	Because these drug dealers own presidents.
	They own Congress.
	They own the courts.
	They own the TV systems.
	These systems of influence, manipulation, and tactics were largely operative when COVID arrived.
	And when they bought Trump.
	Same thing they did to come after these other doctors.
	They just, you know, bribe somebody, pay them off.
	Add to that the warp speed development of more vaccines, government green lights, pharmaceutical indemnity, confidential contracts.
	And you have the markings of a pharmaceutical payday the likes of which we've never seen.
	Nobody else could have done that but me.
	I told them you gotta do it now.
	Oh, the FDA wasn't happy with me.
	Said do it right now, do it at warp speed.
	Just leave behind a trail of dead bodies and no accountability for any of this.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Oh
	You're listening to the David night show I
	Yeah, I'd like to see that clip that Handy sent.
	Can you pull up the comment there so I can see it?
	I'm a rock fan.
	Handy said, I'm a little behind.
	Here is Pfizer's Albert Bourla declaring that they didn't use the virus, quote unquote, to develop the jabs.
	They used a pseudovirus.
	That's the only kind there is, folks.
	A computer model.
	I have the clip pulled, Travis says, so let's go ahead and play that.
	Omicron-specific vaccine, which we understand you started working on already and could have by March.
	Yes.
	The data that we received are data that we got from what we call Are working on this.
	How will you make about whether those three doses are enough?
	Or if you do need to switch to that Omicron specific vaccine, which we understand you started working on already and could have by March.
	Yes, the data that we received are data that we got from what we call pseudovirus.
	So it's not the real virus, it is a virus that we have constructed in our labs and it is identical with the Omicron virus.
	This is a very well-known study and the first data that are coming out of this.
	We are working to produce and also reproduce the same results with the real virus.
	And that will come in maybe a week or two.
	And those typically are more accurate because those studies are... Yeah, we didn't actually isolate anything here.
	We just kind of got computer models of it.
	That's what they do with everything.
	It's not just them.
	All of the different places had nothing but pseudoviruses, computer models.
	Um, that's what we think it would be.
	You know, if I was going to, this is, this is like, uh, asking AI, uh, to, uh, give you the virus.
	It's like, yeah, it'll make it up.
	That's exactly what it is.
	I mean, just like, uh, AI has made up all these different things on rock fan, Fran Edwards.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate the tip.
	And on rock fan, solo cat, 1980 CDC communist dictating consensus.
	That's exactly what it is.
	Centrally controlled disease, isn't it?
	And the disease is of the mind.
	Let's take a look at the other MacGuffin here.
	The UK High Court has revoked the permit for the first coal mine in 30 years.
	They have started to move along the path to do this.
	And this is a particular type of coal that is used.
	They call it metallurgical coal used to make steel.
	And so the conservative government had reluctantly said, yeah, let's do it.
	But as soon as the labor government comes in, they said, no, we will not defend it.
	And of course, if you don't defend the case in court, it's guaranteed to be lost.
	So London's high court on Friday.
	Quashed the planning permission for the first new coal mine in the UK in three decades, ruling that the permit was unlawful as it hadn't considered the emissions from burning fuel.
	Again, we're going to have to oppose these UN unicorn fart things.
	That is fundamental.
	That is the fundamental lie.
	The idea that missions, no matter how small, no matter how tiny, we already have a situation again.
	Just to repeat, CO2, only 0.04% of the atmosphere, only 3% of that from all mankind's activities, including Bill Gates' private jets.
	And yet, you know, if we can reduce that 3% by 50%, still not good enough.
	By 90%, still not good enough.
	It's got to be zero.
	Got to zero out that 3% or we're all going to die.
	That 3% of 0.4%.
	Yeah, do the math.
	Multiply those together.
	See what you get.
	It's like 1 ten thousandth of a percentage.
	It's just ridiculous what we're talking about.
	So, the project to mine metallurgical coal So they can make steel is going to be shut down.
	But what do they need that for this year?
	They shut down the last steel plant in the UK.
	So, you know, what do we need metallurgical call for so they can sell it to China?
	That's what they should have said.
	They should have said, no, no, no.
	We don't have any steel plants anymore because our energy costs are too expensive.
	They had to shut down.
	So we're just mining the metallurgical coal so we can send it to China where they can put it in the dirtiest coal plants.
	And we don't have to worry about it because it's emissions coming from China, according to the Paris Climate Accord.
	You know, the Paris Climate Accord, we've had China's advantage, they call it the China price, always in the past was based on things like currency manipulation, slave labor, pirated intellectual property, stolen ideas, right?
	But now you can add to that the Paris Climate Accord, because the Paris Climate Accord says they're the only ones who can have cheap electricity.
	Everybody else has got to pay 10, 20, 40 times as much as the Chinese do.
	So how are you ever going to have any manufacturing?
	The globalists have transferred it all to China.
	Thank you, Henry Kissinger.
	President Kissinger and his puppet Nixon.
	Thank you so much for doing that.
	And now that that authoritarian, totalitarian place is now going to be given a monopoly on manufacturing, that'll be another lever for the globalists to impose their tyranny on us.
	After they've made us all dependent on China, they've shut down all of our manufacturing and live off of what we can import from China.
	China is the control point, the choke point, and they kept that going and propagated that, made it even more intense with the Paris Climate Accord.
	A treaty that was never ratified.
	An unratified treaty that the Republicans, Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, none of these people ever called BS on it and never said, hey, wait a minute, that's a treaty we didn't ratify.
	No, they never said anything about that.
	So the new labor government pulled its support for the lawsuit.
	It wasn't contested.
	Friends of the Earth... No, they're actually enemies of mankind.
	Friends of the Earth brought the lawsuit and they said, we have to leave fossil fuels in the ground and build the cleaner, brighter, unaffordable future.
	That will slash emissions, cut bills, and create the well-paid jobs of tomorrow that areas like West Cumbria so urgently need.
	That was the West Cumbria people who are now not going to have any jobs.
	But when I said the unaffordable, I threw that in there.
	They didn't put that in, of course.
	And then thanks, Sam, for sending this to me.
	The Dutch city, The Hague, is the world's first to ban oil and air travel ads.
	Why is that important?
	Well, because I was just talking about how the pharmaceutical companies own the media.
	The media is not going to oppose the vaccines or anything else that the pharmaceutical companies do.
	The antibiotics are not going to do any exposés like you used to see from 60 Minutes or things like that when they exposed the fraud of swine flu back in the 70s, 50 years ago.
	They're not going to do any of those types of things.
	They're not going to show people being injured by Vioxx or things like that.
	Why?
	Because of the Ask Your Doctor commercials.
	The purpose of those commercials is so that they are contributing, you know, a quarter or a third of the advertising revenue, sometimes more of the independent of the individual networks.
	And the networks are going to shut down any stories that would be critical of their sponsors.
	Brought to you by Pfizer, right?
	And so if you're going to take away the ads for anything that has to do with burning fuel.
	Any air travel, any recreational cruises, anything like that, then guess what?
	There's going to be a lot of stories done criticizing all of those activities, which they wouldn't have done if those people would have been able to advertise with them.
	But now it's just going to be the government telling them that, you know, yeah, you run this kind of stuff, you run that, the government's going to be happy with your news outlet.
	And there's no disincentive.
	To attack these fundamental things.
	So that's why it's important that they're pulling off, that they're banning the ads.
	Because they have to ban the ads so they can run negative propaganda against the people that are engaged in those activities.
	So they can build public support to have the government shut it down.
	The Hague has just become the first city in the world to ban oil ads and ads for large energy consuming industries including air travel and cruise ships.
	The city is the world's first to adopt such a ban after the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres earlier this year called on governments to do this.
	So they've jumped in and done it.
	This is coming from the UN.
	Who funds the UN?
	We do.
	We have met the enemy and he is us.
	Look folks, you know, they create these structures, but you've got to pay attention to who pays it.
	It's just like the lockdown stuff.
	Oh, it was those bad Democrat governors.
	That's that bad UN.
	Who's paying them?
	Trump, Biden, federal government, Republicans and Democrats in Congress, both houses, the house and Senate, all of them, all of them are funding this stuff.
	That's us.
	That's us.
	That's where the money to make this happen is coming from us, so they are for it.
	Never let them tell you otherwise.
	So, climate change is the mother of, this is what Guterres is telling everybody, it's total projection.
	Total projection of what he is, this petty tyrant who's never produced anything but misery.
	And scarcity for people.
	Antonio Guterres.
	Where did he come from?
	How did he get this job?
	What did he ever do to get in this position?
	Climate change is the mother of all stealth taxes paid by everyday people in vulnerable countries and communities.
	That's what the UN is.
	The UN is a stealth tax.
	Most Americans don't even think about the fact that we're the major contributor to the U.N.
	Oh, we hate the U.N.
	We've got to get out of the U.N.
	Well, just stop sending them money about that.
	Oh no, we've got to send money to everybody and everything.
	And then he says, meanwhile, the godfathers of climate chaos, that would be the UN, right?
	They're the organized crime of the climate chaos.
	But no, he says, it's the fossil fuel industry that's the godfather of climate chaos.
	They are taking in record profits.
	They're feasting off of trillions in taxpayer-funded subsidies.
	At the same time, the UN is saying, we're going to dictate this, and it's going to be trillions of dollars.
	It's going to be transferred from everyday people To people like Bill Gates and Elon Musk and others like that.
	The world's richest men are going to get even richer off of this green new steel.
	I mean, everything that he is, he projects onto others.
	And then he goes down to Tonga, the Pacific island, and he tells them, this is a crazy situation.
	Rising seas are a crisis entirely of humanity's making.
	Yeah, I'd like to see that.
	I'd like to go down to Tonga.
	I really would.
	I'd like to see how the sea is higher there.
	Who is this guy?
	Is he like Moses or something?
	You got a wall of water over here on the southwestern side of the Pacific and it's dry on the other side?
	How's that work?
	Absolutely no evidence for this.
	No evidence at all.
	But he blames humanity.
	It's entirely humanity's making.
	Let's hate humanity.
	Five minutes of hate for humanity.
	We're well in.
	Absolutely no evidence at all.
	And by the way, these billionaires who we keep paying for the green new steel, they take all of these rapacious profits and they pour them into mansions that are built on the seashore.
	And if you go to these green websites where they tell you, oh, this is where, this is all going to be underwater in no time at all.
	If these guys are right, these billionaires, Obama's stuff, all of it, that's all going to be underwater.
	Boy, we should tell them.
	I really don't want them to, you know, be owning swampland in Kennebunkport.
	The battle over net zero has only just begun.
	So this is what's happening.
	Just take a look at Scotland, for example.
	I talked about the fact that they shut down The last steel plant in the UK.
	Now they've shut down the actions to, you know, the intention to mine metallurgical coal.
	And so this net zero battle, we will stop it or it will enslave and kill us, folks.
	It's just that simple.
	It's just like the other MacGuffin.
	The purpose of the viral BS, the germ game that was run on us, is the same as the purpose of this climate change.
	Both of them are about depopulation, global governance, slavery, police state, surveillance state.
	That's what it's always been about from the very beginning, even before the very first Earth Day.
	It was all about depopulation, the population bomb, and all the rest of this stuff.
	So Scotland's last remaining oil refinery Grangemouth is to shut, we learned last week, with a loss of 400 jobs.
	The plant co-owned by Sir Jim Ratcliffe's INEOS is closing due to the UK's incoming ban on new petrol and diesel cars to hit net zero targets.
	Grangemouth produces most of the petrol, diesel and heating oil and aviation fuel used in Scotland, Northern England and Northern Ireland.
	The closure, said Enios, reflected lower fuel demand given the ban on petrol and diesel.
	It's about to come into force.
	So this is the de-industrialization of the West.
	To enslave us.
	To kill us.
	Because folks, cheap available energy is not just about quality of life.
	It's about life expectancy as well.
	And it's been shown.
	I mean you can statistically look at places where energy is very expensive or non-existent and you can see the difference in lifespan from place to place.
	It's not just about convenience and quality of life.
	So they're going to shut down the last remaining oil refinery in Scotland.
	So they're shutting down.
	The last steel plant has been shut down.
	The last oil refinery shut down.
	Not going to pull out any more metallurgical coal even to sell it to China.
	This is the deindustrialization and slavery of the West, and England is leading the way, but we are close behind.
	Sharon Graham, who is the General Secretary of the second biggest union, in the UK, accused Grangemouth's billionaire owners of industrial vandalism, she said.
	But, after the usual scapegoating of that, she said the road to net zero cannot be paid for with workers' jobs.
	You see, the unions in the UK are starting to realize that the Labour Party is going to destroy their jobs.
	You can have all the hate that you want directed at the billionaires, and they certainly deserve it.
	But it's the government, the labor government, that is behind this.
	The billionaires are reacting to the labor government's mandates and bans.
	It wasn't.
	They were making money.
	They didn't want to shut this thing down.
	You can get angry with them and say, well, they're exploiting this or that.
	I don't know if that's true or not.
	It's not always true.
	They're producing a product.
	The government doesn't produce anything.
	The government produces bans.
	The government produces scarcity, austerity.
	And it's the industrialized companies that these people hate so much that they work for that produced their jobs and produced their prosperity.
	And so after kowtowing, and you know she's probably coming from a Marxist position, so you've got to attack the dirty capitalists.
	But then she does say the true part out loud.
	That net zero is going to be paid for with workers jobs.
	Says don't do that to labor.
	But it is going to happen.
	Along with Grangemouth, the government recently confirmed the closure of the last two blast furnaces.
	of steelworks, resulting in the loss of 2,500 more jobs.
	Labour's green policies are, quote, hollowing out the working-class communities, said the leader of Great Britain's third biggest union.
	So you've got the second and the third largest unions are coming together and saying, wait a minute, the Labour Party is going to destroy all of our jobs, especially all the good-paying jobs.
	The good-paying jobs are in manufacturing.
	They're not in service sectors.
	The government has said we must stop decarbonization through deindustrialization.
	See, that's the whole point.
	They told you the quiet part.
	They told you the straight shot right up front.
	You didn't believe them?
	You voted for them because they're labor?
	You voted for them because you're socialists and communists and so are they, but they're going to destroy your jobs.
	Decarbonization through deindustrialization, because deindustrialization is the goal.
	Not saving the world from emissions.
	The goal is deindustrialization.
	They're just going to have a different MacGuffin to do it in different places.
	That's the whole point.
	The deindustrialization is the penultimate thing, right?
	But the ultimate goal is depopulation.
	Deindustrialization is just before the final goal of depopulation.
	At last week's Trade Union Congress conference, the second and third largest labor unions highlighted union concerns about the route to net zero.
	A journey that Labour is determined to pursue more doggedly than the Tories, who also, by the way, pushed it.
	The Tories were headed for that as well.
	The difference between the Tories and the Labour Party in the UK.
	It's like the difference between the Republicans and Democrats here.
	They're both Thelma and Louise, you know, and they're headed to the cliff, and we're sitting in the back seat, and And the question is, how fast are they driving?
	Which one is going to drive faster to get us over the cliff?
	But they're both going to drive us over the cliff.
	And we're the Brad Pitt in the back seat here.
	The two unions push through a joint motion opposing Labor's incoming ban on North Sea drilling licenses championed by the Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband.
	So we have an Energy Secretary who doesn't want any energy.
	That's the government now.
	Net zero energy.
	But who needs it?
	What do you need to have oil for if there's going to be no refineries?
	What do you need to have coal for if there's not going to be any steel?
	And all this is to get rid of cars and everything else.
	They want cast iron guarantees, they said, for the workers affected.
	Some 30,000 offshore North Sea oil and gas jobs, plus another 200,000 or so along the UK's oil and gas supply chain.
	Well, here's a cast iron guarantee.
	That's why they were testing us with stimulus checks, testing us with a lockdown.
	Because as Michael Bloomberg said when he was running for president in 2020, and he said it before the lockdowns, of course, He dropped out before that point.
	But when he was running, he said, yeah, we had an agrarian society.
	Those people didn't know anything.
	We took their jobs.
	We set up the industrialized society, and we're going to shut down those people as well.
	And we're going to make all the money.
	The only way that we have to figure out what to do is how to keep these people from coming after us with guillotine.
	They've got to figure out how to keep the Labor Party.
	It's got to figure out how to keep the head of the trade unions from coming after them.
	And I'm sure what they'll do is they'll probably buy off the leaders, or they'll replace them.
	They won't do anything to help rank and file.
	There's a growing awareness among voters that net zero is aggravating the cost of living crisis.
	No, really?
	Yeah.
	Subsidies added to bills mean despite the growing use of renewables or even because of it.
	Well, there they go.
	They finally figured because of the renewables.
	UK firms and households are paying the highest electricity prices in Europe.
	In Europe.
	It's the worst anywhere in Europe in the UK.
	The first big test is the incoming ban, beginning in 2035 across Britain and the European Union on new petrol and diesel cars.
	But second-hand sales will remain legal.
	For now, of course.
	But how are you going to fuel them, right?
	When there's no refineries, when you're not allowed to drill the oil, you're not allowed to refine the oil, where are you going to get your fuel?
	Your cars, your legacy cars, they won't come around and confiscate them.
	They'll let you park them in your front yard as As memorials of a time when we were free and mobile.
	Like the wagon wheels that people put in their yards, you know?
	UK car sales, up around 3% over last year, remained 15% lower than before the lockdown.
	Within that, EV sales have slumped even further, with their market share stuck at about 18% for the last three years.
	See, the intention is not to have any cars.
	That includes EVs.
	They don't want you to have EVs either.
	They know how inefficient the EVs are.
	They know how heavy they are, how resource intensive they are, how they're going to be a burden on the strained power grid.
	You will not be allowed to have any cars.
	They never, when they were talking about this stuff back in the 60s, the early 70s, the first Earth days, it was like, ban all the cars.
	They weren't saying, ban all the cars except the electric ones.
	No, ban all the cars, all the cars.
	Manufacturers since January face fines if 22% of the cars they sell in Britain aren't fully electric.
	They have to pay 15,000 pounds for every vehicle with which they fall short.
	Well, what does that do to the price of the other cars?
	The target ratchets is up to 28% next year and is expected to hit 80% by 2030, even if the complete ban remains at 2035.
	So they're phasing this in.
	How do you do it?
	You do it from the inside.
	You do it with disruption and you do it iteratively, right?
	Just listen to Fauci.
	All the MacGuffins work the same way.
	So 22%, 28% and by 2030 be 80%.
	Uh, and at the 22% thing, $15,000 fine for every vehicle with which they fall short.
	So they're not going to make or sell the other ones, because if nobody's buying the electric cars, they're going to have to pay a big, big fee for the other ones.
	So, uh, they're saying this is going to lead to rationing of petrol and diesel cars.
	It's also going to make their price sore.
	You think electric cars are expensive?
	Oh, just wait to see how expensive these penalties that are going to be ushered in on gas and diesel cars will become.
	Manufacturers can only avoid ruinous fines by dramatically curtailing petrol and diesel car production.
	Governments in the UK and across Europe face a mighty industrial battle over the coming years to push through net zero policies and the teeth of trade union and popular resistance, which is going to grow.
	With each of these high-profile plant closings, the intensity of that file ratchets it up.
	But is it going to ratchet up quickly enough?
	Are people going to do anything about it?
	I'm not convinced that they are when I look at the responses to what happened with this pandemic, MacGuffin.
	On Rumble, APXCOG, thank you very much for the tip.
	Evil creates nothing.
	It only perverts something that has already been created.
	And it prevails when good people stand by and do nothing.
	Absolutely right.
	On Rumble, Dana in Alaska, David, there was a suggestion yesterday that boron is an effective antidote to fluoroquinolones.
	If you decide to pursue taking boron, please know that regular pure borax, the powdered laundry boar team, works perfectly and is far less expensive than boron supplements.
	I myself have been taking it in water for a couple of years for arthritis.
	Walter Last's paper, The Borax Conspiracy, is very good to read.
	Also, lots of info can be found, and he gives us a link.
	Give me that link, I want to read that.
	It's a great detox in the bath as well.
	Thank you so much, and I've got some other comments here from listeners that I want to get to, and I appreciate each and every one of these things.
	We look to God for healing.
	But God can use and does use ordinary means, and sometimes the biggest miracles can be miracles of providence.
	And so we are open to any and every help that we can get, especially prayer.
	We really would like to have your prayers on this.
	But thank you for that.
	We will look that up.
	It is.
	Um, the problem is nobody knows for sure exactly, you know, how this, this mechanism operates.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	All right, let's take a look at I've got some other stuff that's coming up here on the climate.
	And Bill Gates has a Netflix documentary.
	It's going to land tomorrow.
	Uh, well, we don't get Netflix, but, um, I'll, I'll play you a trailer so that you don't waste your time on it.
	Uh, I'm sure there's going to be some interesting stuff coming out of it.
	Uh, I'm not gonna, I'm not going to do that kind of hard research to watch this thing and actually pull clips out of it.
	Uh, if somebody else pulls clips, I'll let you, I'll pass it on to you, but, um, Just wanted to remind you, please like the stream wherever you're watching it.
	If you're watching it live or you're watching it recorded, whether you're watching it on video or on audio, please like the stream.
	And you can find, you know, you're obviously watching it somewhere now if you see this, but if you want to know other places where you can watch it, Other modes that you can watch it.
	You can find the links to everything, all of the video channels that we have, and the podcasts that we have.
	Those links are on TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	That'll give you links to the various places, but we're on a lot of different podcasts.
	Well, all the podcasts, essentially, except for Spotify, you can find us.
	They're the only ones to ban us.
	In terms of video, you're not going to find us on YouTube.
	You're not going to find us on Facebook.
	But you'll find us on Twitter and Gab.
	You'll find us on Rumble, on BitChute, on Odyssey, and even on YouTube.
	So we have the links to those various places.
	And so please like the stream.
	Let's take a look at Bill Gates's new documentary series on Netflix.
	He wants us to give up hydrocarbons almost entirely.
	Well, how about if we give up on the UN?
	How about if we give up on the World Health Organization?
	How about if we stop giving them money?
	How about if we stop giving money to Netflix, who gives money to Bill Gates to lecture us about what we should do?
	It's just disgusting.
	Who does this guy think he is?
	He's not a scientist.
	He's not a doctor.
	He's a tyrant.
	He's a spoiled brat.
	His family is all about depopulation.
	That's how he got there.
	Always big and Planned Parenthood.
	It's going to be lecturing viewers at one point, we have to give up hydrocarbons almost entirely.
	Never mind, says Breitbart, that Bill Gates' carbon footprint is many times the size of the average American, that Netflix itself has maintained its own private jet.
	That's not even the big deal.
	I mean, the big deal is what they're doing with artificial intelligence.
	We can hector these guys with the hypocrisy of flying all over the world in a private jet just like Taylor Swift and all the rest of the stuff.
	That is small potatoes compared to the AI data centers.
	Those AI data centers that are going to be using more energy and water than most cities do.
	That's really where the hypocrisy is.
	So what's next, he says?
	Well, he's going to start streaming it tomorrow.
	It's got a lot of causes that he's going to lecture us about one after the other.
	Misinformation.
	We've got to get rid of free speech.
	We've got to get rid of mobility.
	We've got to get rid of meat and food and all the rest of the stuff.
	Why?
	Because Bill Gates says so.
	And then, of course, artificial intelligence.
	He likes that.
	But he's also going to be talking about income inequality.
	Boy, talk about hypocrisy.
	One of the two or three richest people on earth.
	Talking about income inequality?
	Hey pal, do something about it yourself if you want.
	Start, you know, go down the road and start throwing out $100 bills to people.
	You could do that for a thousand years and still not run out of money.
	Income inequality.
	Anthony Fauci is going to make an appearance on it.
	And we've got a, here's the trailer for this piece of filth.
	This is a show about... Ooh, there's something wrong with his forehead.
	You see that?
	Got a big lump there.
	A lot of big challenges right now.
	Climate change.
	Creating responsible AI.
	Misinformation.
	Income inequality.
	Dealing with infectious diseases.
	But I believe we can solve them.
	How will artificial intelligence impact society?
	Crafted text to my son using Gen Z slang.
	Yo fam, what's good?
	How you vibin'?
	At a certain point, A.I.
	will be good enough to build a better A.I.
	So, A.I.
	builds a better A.I., which builds a better, which builds a better, which builds a better, which builds a better, which builds a better, which builds a better.
	It's getting hard to write science fiction.
	Bill Gates is part of a reptilian race that includes Tom Hanks and Lady Gaga.
	I don't have the solution.
	Come on, Bill!
	Bill Gates is part of a reptilian race that includes Tom Hanks and Lady Gaga.
	Oh, confession.
	...and information are a lot closer together than they ever have been before.
	There's no way to stop it.
	I don't have the solution.
	Come on, Bill.
	No, one thing he doesn't know, how to censor us, huh?
	Almost entirely.
	Climate change benefits by having lots of young activists.
	I operate from love of my home and the people.
	I learned... I'm gonna cry!
	...like I do from the scientists coming up with the breakthroughs.
	We have the obscene situation where there are three people, you being one of them, who own more wealth than the bottom half of America.
	Is the system working?
	In your judgment, is it working?
	What do you think?
	We've got a lot of work to do.
	The sooner the better.
	My hope is to eradicate malaria in my lifetime.
	I want to eradicate it in my lifetime.
	People.
	I want to eradicate people.
	Oh, Bono's there, yeah.
	Do you think we can do it?
	We have to make him up if we did no one believes the character. Oh bonoes there. Yeah, I'm patient. I gotta have any challenges Do you do it?
	Absolutely What a piece of garbage Yeah, it's kind of interesting.
	I don't know what's going on with that big lump on his forehead or not.
	You know, maybe there is a reminder from God of his mortality.
	But I don't know.
	It might not be anything serious.
	It could be like, what was it?
	Uh, the guy Van Damme, can't remember his first name now.
	Uh, he had that kind of thing on his, on his head back in the eighties.
	He's still around.
	Jean-Claude.
	Jean-Claude.
	Yes.
	Jean-Claude Van Damme.
	And he had that, uh, he had a lump like Bill Gates there.
	I wonder if Bill Gates is doing martial law.
	He get popped in the head or something with it.
	Jean-Claude Van Damme seems a lot cooler than Bill Gates.
	Oh, he is.
	He's definitely way cooler.
	I don't see, unless we've got AI doing it, I don't think Bill Gates is going to be able to do this split thing that he did.
	He puts a foot on two separate things and keeps it parallel.
	Gates has been called out numerous times for flying around the world on his multiple private aircraft.
	Again, Breitbart wants to focus on this.
	Focus on the AI data centers and the massive consumption and how ridiculous that is.
	That is something that just kind of came out of nowhere.
	I don't really think they thought about that.
	We need to hold the spotlight on that hypocrisy because remember, it was in the spring, it was in March of 2022 that the Biden administration, when they want to push through CBDC, they had four different areas.
	One of them is how are we going to completely restructure the entire financial system?
	Second one was, um, How are we going to write the code?
	Third one was, how are we going to enforce it with the thugs at the Department of Justice, the FBI and the IRS?
	And then the fourth one was to talk about how energy friendly CBDs were compared to cryptocurrency.
	Got to get rid of all the cryptocurrency that's in other people's hands.
	And everybody's got to go to our fiat cryptocurrency, the CBDC.
	Well, that's small potatoes.
	All that cryptocurrency mining and everything, that's nothing compared to the AI stuff.
	People really need to hit that.
	I mean, that, that was going to be their big selling point.
	It should be our big selling point in terms of hypocrisy, but not so much.
	Then they talked about AI and he has AI write a letter to his son using millennial speak.
	Did that sound like the way that you talk all the time, Travis?
	It's like, yo man, I speak jive, you know?
	It's like airplane or something.
	He's got AI that speaks jive.
	I absolutely cannot stand the way people talk anymore.
	Just because you're not allowed to say certain words like suicide or death or harm on these social media platforms, it has dumbed down our vocabulary to an even greater extent than it already was.
	Oh, yeah.
	People are forced to say things like, oh, they unalived themselves to avoid being demonetized.
	What?
	Yeah, I don't play that game.
	That's why I can't even put Christmas carols up.
	I imagine they don't like Christmas carols either, though.
	I didn't have any words with them, but the words were implied.
	I don't know.
	Anyway, he had some very nice things to say about La La Harris.
	He said, Gates says, I think it's great to have somebody who's younger who can think about things like AI.
	Yeah.
	She's thought about AI.
	I remember that when she thought about AI, she had very profound thoughts about AI.
	And I think the first part of this issue that should be articulated is AI is kind of a fancy thing.
	It's first of all, it's two letters.
	It means artificial intelligence, but ultimately what it is, is it's about machine learning.
	And so the machine.
	is taught. And part of the issue here is what information is going into the machine that will then determine, and we can predict then if we think about what information is going on, what then will be produced in terms of decisions and opinions that may be made through that process.
	She is a walking example of artificial intelligence.
	I think she's actually a shining beacon of genuine stupidity.
	Yeah, I mean, that's dumb, isn't it?
	It's two letters, A and I. Well, just as stupid as all that, the ocean is overflowing again.
	I mentioned this earlier.
	This is really being passed around by Antonio Guterres, the UN chief.
	He puts out a climate SOS.
	Save our seas, he said.
	The southwestern Pacific is hurt by rising oceans.
	Only the southwestern Pacific.
	Isn't that interesting?
	How does that work?
	Again, the parting of the seas.
	This guy is like, he's like Moses.
	He's parting the seas, a worsening sea level rise.
	He says, Hey, look, we saw this before Venice had floods and everybody, Oh, look, you know, Venice is disappearing is going into the water.
	Of course it has been sinking.
	The city has been sinking for quite some time, but everybody's like, Oh, Venice is going to go away because of global warming and flooding.
	And it wasn't, but just a couple of months later, I remember it vividly.
	They had droughts and it's like, how do you have a drought in Venice?
	You know, I mean, it's, and they had some empty canals that they had pictures of, but it was absolute crickets, not a word for mainstream media when the drought hit because they wanted to use it to talk about rising seas.
	And so now Antonio Guterres is a Southwestern Pacific.
	is being hurt by rising oceans.
	Just that one area.
	And he's saying that, and he goes to Samoa and Tonga, trying to say that the reason, and again, his office commissioned a report.
	They paid somebody lots of money to come up with this data for them that they could then use to sell panic.
	What they found was that water rose around Tonga At 8.3 inches between 1990 and 2020.
	3.3 inches between 1990 and 2020.
	They said that was twice the global average of 3.9 inches.
	While other places in Fiji had 11.4 inches.
	Wait a minute.
	Have you ever had a glass?
	This is worse than the optimist and the pessimist saying the glass is half full.
	This is the climate people telling you that the glass is higher on one side of water than it is on the other side of the water.
	And within the South Pacific, The variation is from 8 inches to 11 1⁄2 inches.
	How does that happen?
	Are they using PCR tests?
	How are they measuring this?
	I don't understand.
	Somebody get a real scientist in here, please.
	They tried to explain it by saying sea levels are rising faster in the western tropical Pacific because of where the melting ice from western Antarctica heads.
	Warmer waters and ocean currents, say U.S.
	U.N.
	officials.
	We're talking about a 30-year increase.
	You mean to tell me that over 30 years this thing has not leveled out somehow?
	And how do you explain this kind of difference between Fiji and Tonga?
	8.3 versus 11.4.
	None of this is real folks.
	This is, this is beyond stupid.
	This is Lala Harris level science.
	I mean, this is EV semi prices, you know, the big rigs need to fall another 30 to 50% in order to be able to compete with diesel.
	Look, That's only if you're assuming that there's real competition out there.
	They're just going to mandate this stuff and they don't care if it's higher prices for everybody.
	They don't care if you can afford to upgrade your semi-trailer.
	They don't care if the companies that can afford to update it pass along the costs to you and everything gets 50% more or doubles in price or what.
	They don't care about any of that stuff.
	They're just going to mandate it because the whole purpose is de-industrialization.
	The whole purpose is to make everything more expensive, to enslave us.
	Companies like Pepsi have done token purchases of a couple of EV semis, but they're still using internal combustion engines, diesel 18 wheelers to actually get product to the shelf.
	They buy a couple of them to virtue signal and they get some news articles written about how green they are.
	But if they actually want to get something to the market, they use a traditional diesel truck because we've got all kinds of problems.
	Recharging time, a lack of even having chargers, you're charging infrastructure, all the rest of the stuff.
	But we are so far away from reality.
	It's insane.
	They just had a Tesla semi catch fire.
	It took 50,000 gallons of water.
	Doesn't matter.
	I mean, just look at how much energy they use at their data centers.
	Look at how much water they use at their data centers.
	Look at how much water they use in one vehicle fire.
	Who cares?
	It's only important if you have a little bit of energy.
	But for them, they get a pass.
	Doesn't matter.
	In addition to the huge amount of water, 50,000 gallons, firefighters used an aircraft to drop fire retardant on the immediate area of the electric truck as a precautionary measure, because these things are like the joke birthday candles.
	They keep relighting themselves.
	Firefighters had said previously that the battery fire of this diesel Tesla, not diesel, this Tesla Semi, had reached temperatures of a thousand degrees Fahrenheit while it was burning.
	The other thing that they don't talk about are the gases.
	Do these EV battery fires, do they create any kind of gases that could cause global warming?
	Nah, that doesn't matter.
	The bombs that they drop around the world in all their wars, they don't matter.
	The rocket fuel that they use to send up all of the, you know, 20,000 satellites that Tesla is going to blanket the atmosphere with, that doesn't matter either.
	The rocket fuel and the jet fuel that they use in their wars, the bombs, none of that matters.
	None of it matters.
	It's only, wait a minute, what kind of car are you driving?
	That's what they care about.
	And they don't care if it's toxic either.
	Because the whole point is to kill us, right?
	You know, CO2 is not toxic.
	You see people writing about this stuff in the press all the time.
	They don't know the difference between carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.
	All the time talking about, oh, we gotta stop the carbon monoxide.
	Yeah, let's definitely stop the carbon monoxide.
	Carbon dioxide, though, is what plants need.
	But they don't care about that.
	They don't care that the battery fires are toxic.
	The agency also found the truck was not operating in the automated driving system.
	Oh, that's convenient, isn't it?
	The crash happened about 3.13 in the morning.
	As a tractor trailer was being driven by a Tesla employee.
	Uh, the semi left the road while going around a curve to the right and hit a tree.
	The report said it went down a slope and came to rest against several trees.
	The driver was not hurt.
	You must've been booking it around that corner.
	Yeah.
	Oh, look at this.
	I, I got these, uh, got lots of torque with this EV.
	I can really stomp on it after the crash.
	The semi's lithium-ion battery ignited.
	Well, he got out, but we just had another crash.
	Tesla, people were trapped inside, couldn't get out.
	Both of them burned alive beyond recognition.
	It's a horrible way to die.
	The freeway was closed for about 15 hours.
	I wonder how much wasted time and fuel and emissions all these cars and trucks had when they closed the freeway.
	What do you think about that?
	I wonder, that doesn't matter either.
	Just like the AI data centers don't matter.
	But we're going to steal the future.
	And we're going to steal it with green steel.
	It's another one of their, the green new steel.
	Well, they've actually got new green steel and it's made out of hydrogen, not out of coal.
	But it's incredibly expensive and the technology is not there yet.
	And they have been working and made great advances just like they have in coal burning plants and gas plants and everything.
	They've had incredible advances in efficiency and emission reduction.
	But we're going to throw out all that out the window.
	And we're going to start over from scratch.
	So that people like Bill Gates can get in at the ground floor and make all the money.
	Steel is essential in modern society.
	It gives us homes, factories, bridges, vehicles, all manners of other machines and infrastructure.
	Since 2001, global steel production has doubled.
	With seemingly little thought, however, being applied, policymakers, environmentalists, and some industry leaders are promoting hydrogen-fueled manufacturing with an enthusiasm that was once reserved for solar panels.
	And we know how that turned out.
	A lot of federal money into companies that have gone bankrupt.
	But look, steel and manufacturing, those are really core to the wealth of a country.
	All that's gone to China.
	Andrew Carnegie, who was a steel magnate, not a magnet, but a magnate, and J.P.
	Morgan said, you're the world's richest man because of the steel.
	But now we are sending all of that to China.
	We don't want to do that anymore because they want to keep the formerly free countries under their thumb.
	They want to censor us, propagandize us.
	Enslave us.
	A shift toward hydrogen steelmaking risks undoing a century of progress in efficient production.
	The high costs, the technological challenges, the limited scalability of hydrogen-based processes are guaranteed to render it less viable than steelmaking relying on coal.
	Well, that's why they want to do it!
	They don't want us to be able to make it.
	China will still be making steel with coal.
	They'll still be making steel with energy from the dirtiest of coal plants.
	And it'll be super cheap.
	And this is just another venue to make sure that we cannot compete with them, that all of our production manufacturing is sent to them and we have nothing left.
	Over the decades, continuous improvements in blast furnace technology, process control, and energy recovery have led to significant gains in productivity and energy efficiency.
	China continues to dominate in production, capacity, and exports.
	Why?
	Because they've got cheaper energy.
	Other significant steel producers include Japan's Nippon Steel, Sumitomo's Metal Corporation, India's Tata Steel, South Korea's POSCO, and Europe's ArcelorMittal.
	Well, they don't say anything about the U.S., do they?
	The best-performing blast furnaces can achieve energy efficiencies of up to 70%, a figure that seemed unattainable just a few decades ago.
	The risk of abandoning this tried-and-true method for a relatively untested hydrogen-based process cannot be overstated.
	Well, there you go.
	I mean, that's not the purpose of all this stuff.
	The purpose is to make it expensive.
	Renewable energy, it can cost twice as much as coal.
	And that's for starters.
	And so you go back to the drawing board.
	Let's just change everything.
	Let's put these people back in charge so they can make all the money.
	Modern blast furnaces can produce up to 400 tons of steel per hour, operating continuously for years between major maintenance periods.
	That's kind of what they're doing with the coal plants as well.
	This scale of production is crucial for meeting global steel demand.
	So we have the functional efficient things that they've been incrementally improving for decades and they've reached amazing Productivity, efficiency, and clean operation.
	Whether you're talking about the coal plants for electricity, or you're talking about the coal-fired steel plants.
	We've got to shut them all down.
	Why?
	Well, because the government and the central planners said so.
	On the other hand, hydrogen-based steelmaking is one of the more absurd proposals of those who are fear-mongering about global warming.
	It'll have virtually no effect on the Earth's temperature, but it would slow the economic growth and the infrastructure development of our world.
	Not the Chinese!
	And of course, that is precisely the point.
	On Rakuten, George, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	It says, morning all, have a super good day, if you'd be so kind.
	Thank you so much.
	I appreciate that.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	All right.
	Thank you.
	Well, I want to cover a couple of emails from supporters on kind of a personal basis.
	This one is from a Subscribestar supporter.
	He said, Hi David, I heard you mention that there was an ad-free download available to Subscribestar subscribers.
	I couldn't find it.
	Did I hear it incorrectly?
	Thank you for the show.
	So, what we do each day is, for the people on Subscribestar, we send the description of, you know, we kind of break down what topics are talked about, roughly, at the time that they're talked about.
	And so, we send that description, we send links to the show on various video platforms.
	Now, Rumble does have ads that they put on, I think, certainly at the beginning, I believe, but the other video platforms, I think, are ad-free.
	Is that correct, Travis?
	I don't know.
	I don't have enough time to go back and watch our stuff.
	I watch it once in the morning live and then I spend all day editing it.
	Yeah, that's me too.
	But what I was talking about in terms of not having ads, the podcast is available ad-free, and we give that link to an ad-free podcast on the Subscribestar description.
	So you'll see at the top, there'll be links to the videos, to the ad-free audio broadcast that's there.
	That's what we were talking about.
	And then the description there, and also for Subscribestar people, Travis puts the articles on a weekly basis up there for people as well that we talked about during the week.
	Yes, Friday afternoon after the show, I upload the articles to Subscribestar, so you'll have access to all of that if you subscribe there.
	Yeah, because I'll have people who will ask me, you know, where was that article and that type of thing.
	So he puts that up there on Subscribestar for people as well.
	And sometimes you'll even get articles that didn't get covered.
	So you'll get bonus early content.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Because we don't even get to all the stuff that we've, you know, I don't have time to talk about it for three hours.
	But yeah, so there's a lot of stuff that goes up.
	And this is from a listener about antibiotic poisoning, and this might be of interest to other people as well, because it's something that is not rare, even though they say it is.
	So, it's upsetting to hear what happened to your son.
	Years ago, in the late 80s, I found a link between antibiotics and the wasting of B vitamins, especially B6.
	So drastic that some kids ended up with juvenile diabetes.
	I can't give you the references, it was a long time ago.
	But even some MDs provide B vitamins in IV form.
	And she says, since B vitamins are water-soluble, a good complex in IV form should not present problems, but there has been caution in the preventative field to use B complex instead of just one B vitamin alone as they work in unison.
	However, with a B complex as a base, B6 could be added.
	So, thank you, Blanca.
	I appreciate that.
	Yeah, we're going to start with some vitamins infused with that.
	Also glutathione, they have suggested, so we're about to start that with him.
	And by the way, when we talk about B vitamins, we're also giving him B17, which is apricot seeds and things like that, which I don't have any basis to know this, but our position at this point in time is that we just want to help his body to try to heal itself.
	And B-17 is something that has had a lot of very, very good effects.
	By the way, you can read all about it at RNC Store.
	They've got literature there about the history of B-17, how it's worked with a lot of different conditions, helps the body to build up its natural defenses, and you can get 10% off there.
	at the RNC store if you use the code KNIGHT.
	So take a look at that.
	Take a look at the resources that they have there.
	And they have both the natural apricot seeds as well as a supplement and a pill form.
	This is also about detox, suggesting activated charcoal or NAC, and so I appreciate that as well.
	Thank you, Susan, I appreciate that.
	And this is someone who says, I listened to your show on 16th of September, yesterday's show, and I'll be thinking about your beloved son and praying for him.
	I appreciate that.
	That is the key thing for all of this.
	Because as I said before, God heals.
	God also guides us in different ways, and so I would just ask for your prayers in this situation.
	Uh, and let me, uh, thank you, uh, at this point in time, you know, I, I got behind in terms of the Zelle contributors.
	And by the way, if you want to contribute on Zelle, it depends on who you bank with.
	Not all banks support Zelle, but a lot of them do if they do support it.
	Uh, there's no fees, um, taken out, uh, for money that you send via Zelle.
	And if your bank supports Zelle, you can send it to our email, uh, davidknightshowatprotonmail.com.
	And we have that link.
	But I want to thank some of the people.
	nightshow.com and you see that down the bottom Zell at David night show at protonmail.com but I want to thank some of the people I was a bit late but let me start with the first week of September and I think I missed some of the people reading their names according to my checkmark system here on I'll go back to get them later.
	I missed some of the people at the very tail end of August, I believe.
	But starting with the first week of September, thank you so much, Austin.
	Very generous, kind.
	Austin M. And Kevin M., also.
	Several people who support us with a very generous contribution.
	Terry M., another one.
	Ralph M., another one, many of these, Matthew S., Michael L., and Robert A., Deshaun G., William D., Maurice W., Jeffrey C., Adam D., Rogelio J., Kelly K., Susan L., thank you very much, regular, I see these names over and over again, and it's just a few people who support us and they support us very generously.
	We have also William R., and Kimberly M., and Matthew F., who is new.
	That's the first week, and I'll try to get the second week later here in the program.
	I don't want to I don't want to read out too many names all at once for you, but I just wanted to thank those people for their generosity.
	Without their support, this show would not happen.
	They are really the producers of this show.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is happening with money that I think is very interesting.
	We have some troubling times that are on the way, I believe, and many people do.
	And there's an interesting story.
	About a guy who did really well during Germany's hyperinflation.
	What was it that he did?
	And we'll talk about that in just a moment.
	But before we do, I thought this was also interesting.
	In New Jersey, where they have some of the highest taxes in the country, they have decided to eliminate the sales taxes on gold and silver.
	Wow, that's amazing.
	That brings it up to now 45 states where there's no sales tax when you buy gold and silver.
	And I'll tell you the places where that still remains, so maybe you can get involved to do something about it.
	Because it was activists who really took the forefront of this in New Jersey, the Sound Money Defense League.
	metal money metals exchange and a lot of in-state activists were able to get this passed even in New Jersey so there's hope for you if you're in some of these Democrat states or Kentucky which I guess is kind of half-and-half they got a Democrat governor but they've got a lot of Republicans in other places Kentucky was a surprise that they still have a sales tax on gold and silver at
	45 states do not a hard-fought victory as New Jersey's Senate bill 721 was signed into law removing sales taxes on purchases of gold silver and other precious metals above $1,000 effective the 1st of January Now, that's kind of interesting that they would put that limit on because, you know, we are talking about New Jersey.
	They really hate to give up.
	Any taxes on anything.
	But it's now been signed into law, even by Governor Phil Murphy.
	Really, truly surprising.
	It had 13 Democrat and Republican formal sponsors as well, so it's bipartisan.
	In 2024, New Jersey was one of seven states to pass legislation that removes taxes on precious metals, reaffirms gold and silver as constitutional money.
	Isn't that interesting?
	So we had 38 states that did not tax gold and silver beginning of this year.
	Now we're up to 45.
	So what are the five that are remaining?
	They're so greedy.
	New Mexico, Maine, Vermont, Hawaii, all Democrat states, right?
	And then Kentucky.
	Kentucky.
	They voted for Andy Beshear.
	One of the worst tyrant lockdowns.
	Democrat governor that was there.
	It's good policy, they said.
	And they gave a lot of different reasons.
	I thought that this was the most appropriate and the best reason.
	Because levying sales taxes on precious metals is inappropriate.
	Taxes are typically leveled on final consumer goods.
	We're talking about a sales tax.
	It's usually the last thing.
	We don't tax things at every stage of production.
	That's a VAT tax.
	Every time you add a value or transfer or something that gets taxed.
	That's what they do in Europe.
	And of course, you can raise a lot more money.
	You can do it kind of surreptitiously, but you know sales tax is supposed to be on the final sale and then you use it. You don't do anything else with it. Well this is currency and it's being held to exchange again in the future. Precious metals are inherently held for resale not for consumption, making the application of sales taxes totally inappropriate.
	So yeah.
	Executive Director of the Sound Money Defense League traveled to Trenton, New Jersey to testify in support of the exemption before numerous Assembly and Senate committees.
	The victory is a direct result of grassroots pressure from in-state advocates, persistent messaging and communication, and the growing awareness that taxing constitutional money is a backwards policy.
	I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if They had some people who are making a lot of money in the stock market and living in New Jersey who are kind of concerned about what's going to happen to the stock market.
	That might have helped to nudge some of these Democrats along.
	And then, you know, if they saw that stash of gold bars that their Senator Menendez had, you know, it's like, wait a minute, we can at least take the sales tax off of this stuff.
	Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia has been caught secretly buying 160 tons of gold from Switzerland.
	This is from a guy whose name I cannot pronounce.
	It's interesting.
	It's Jan Nguyen, whose, or whatever, I have no idea how to pronounce that.
	I don't know how you pronounce a U, an I, and a J all together, crammed together.
	It makes no sense.
	Anyway, what I thought was interesting in his bio was he said he began as a sound engineer.
	But now he's all about gold and tracking it like a detective.
	You know, who's buying this and who's buying that.
	So he went from being a sound engineer to looking at sound money, I guess.
	You could say if he's interested in gold.
	Evidence suggests the Saudi Central Bank has been covertly buying 160 tons of gold in Switzerland since early 2022.
	What happened in 2022?
	Oh, well, you know, that's the sanctions that Biden put on.
	And I think this is going to be Biden's most famous and lasting legacy.
	The destruction of the petrodollar and the dollar as a global standard of currency.
	I think that's going to be Biden's big legacy.
	Or I should say, not Biden, but the Biden collective.
	You know, the people around him that are actually running the show for this puppet.
	That's going to be their big legacy.
	The legacy of the Biden administration.
	The collective that's there.
	The destruction of the petrodollar.
	Saudi's played a key role in creating the petrodollar and creating the global dollar standard, but now this time around they're playing a key role in its dissolution.
	Until recently, Saudi Arabia's gold demand would decline when gold prices went up and strengthen when the price went south.
	In other words, they were buying and selling it based on opportunities, but this time They've just been steadily accumulating it, according to this detective, gold detective, I guess we could say.
	Ever since the West immobilized Russia's dollar assets in February 2022, when they weaponized the financial system that they were king of.
	That's that really is also the legacy of Biden.
	You know, when he gets in charge, this guy who is, has always been one of the most abusive, obnoxious totalitarian people out there.
	It's amazing to see that Trump has been so nasty that they can portray this guy as a nice guy, but Hey, uh, he's no longer Mr. Nice guy.
	Listen to this press conference where somebody is asking him a question.
	Yeah, you be quiet.
	I'm saying you be quiet while I speak, okay?
	That's what I said.
	Good idea?
	What do you say to Vladimir Putin's threat of war, sir?
	It's a serious threat.
	You guys be quiet and I'm going to make a statement, okay?
	Yeah, you be quiet.
	Alright, anyway.
	Yeah, you be quiet.
	Welcome back to the White House.
	You be quiet.
	Shut up.
	You can't have free speech.
	What do you think this is?
	Free press or something?
	What's the matter with you?
	But yeah, he's been far more bullying than that to people on social media.
	You could say that guy was speaking out of turn, but I don't need to get a turn.
	I don't need to have permission.
	You know, La La Harris thinks that as well.
	Yeah, Musk, he's abused that privilege that he's got.
	That's a privilege and it needs to be taken away from him.
	But then Trump has now said the same thing.
	Oh, look at what these people are saying about me.
	They need to be taken down.
	That's a privilege.
	They're all totalitarians.
	They're all opposed to the Constitution.
	They're all opposed to free speech.
	Since the West immobilized Russia's dollar assets in February 2022, those with diplomatic disagreements with the West are increasingly exchanging their dollars for physical gold.
	Saudi Arabia Is the latest country after China and Thailand, of which I have found cross border trade statistics showing that it has shifted from being price sensitive to being a price driver.
	In other words, they don't care.
	They're not shopping for bargains on gold.
	It's just, we got to get it.
	We got to get into it right now.
	And again, that's what Biden is going to be remembered for during the entire rally from late 2022 until present.
	The rally of gold.
	The Saudis have been a constant net importer, which has boosted the gold price.
	The gold coming from Switzerland actually goes through the Saudi central bank.
	And I think there's advice in that.
	Saudi Arabia has been doing this.
	China has been doing this.
	It makes sense to accumulate this stuff gradually to average out the prices and everything, but it makes sense to accumulate it.
	And not try to maximize whatever the price is at a bargain.
	Formally, any country's cross-border gold trade statistics refer to non-monetary metal, meaning privately owned.
	Monetary gold that's owned by central banks is exempt from being disclosed in trade numbers, though the non-monetary gold crossing the Chinese border is often a shipment that is really heading for the People's Bank of China.
	It's not going to the consumers.
	But they treat it that way, so they can keep it quiet.
	Among industry insiders, the Central Bank of the Saudis is known, they call it SAMA, is known for having accelerated secret gold purchases since 2022.
	By comparing the World Gold Council's estimates of total central bank buying to what central banks report have bought to the IMF, we can conclude unreported purchases.
	And so he says, this is largely due to the People's Bank of China, to a lesser extent, Saudi Bank, that is all these unreported purchases that are there.
	He says that's the first clue.
	And he says because gold ETFs, you know, things like GLD, where you buy a tenth of an ounce and it's supposedly kept These companies that are selling these ETS supposedly have gold somewhere in Shanghai.
	Saudis don't do that.
	You shouldn't do that either.
	These things are disconnected.
	I didn't, I mean, I didn't even think about how dishonest that was until gold started making moves about a decade ago or so.
	And then I noticed that, you know, I had some GLD, which is an ETF of gold.
	I noticed that it wasn't tracking with a spot price on the market.
	So it's like, what's going on with that?
	I started looking at it.
	It's like, oh, well, you know, they probably don't even have that.
	They're probably just using the ETF to manipulate the price.
	So the Saudis are just buying it directly, not getting ETFs.
	Not coincidentally, net imports began to consistently outpace consumer demand in second quarter 2022.
	And that was when the Ukraine war started.
	That was when the weaponized sanctions and blocking using the financial system as a weapon began.
	And so when we look at this, right now, we don't have, we don't set policy.
	And what difference does it make to us if the central banks are buying gold?
	Well, it makes a difference because You know, they know what they're going to do to manipulate things.
	They have a better understanding of what's happening to the marketplace and the geopolitics.
	And when they do it secretly, when they do it throughout price fluctuations, they just keep accumulating.
	Maybe we should learn something from that.
	Maybe we should learn that they want the actual physical gold rather than the ETF.
	So we can watch their behavior and we can learn something from their behavior, even though we have no influence over these banks.
	Saudi Arabia owns way more gold than it wants you to know, just like China.
	Last time the Saudi Central Bank updated its official gold reserves was in February 2008, when it said that it had 332 tons, which was 180 tons more than they'd said in the previous month of January 2008.
	Obviously, they didn't buy 180 tons in one month.
	than they'd said in the previous month of January 2008.
	Obviously, they didn't buy 180 tons in one month.
	It just changed their story.
	And so, why are they hiding it?
	Well, a lot of it is political.
	But Saudi Arabia, you know, Saudi Arabia is part of the petrodollar.
	They didn't want the U.S.
	to get upset by seeing them buy this stuff, but now they're not really paying that close of attention.
	Now they're making it pretty clear they want to get involved in BRICS and other things like that.
	They're making it pretty clear that, yeah, the petrodollar is dead.
	If they're going to accept payment and other currencies, and they have begun doing that with multiple other currencies, once they do that, by definition, the petrodollar is dead.
	So he says, I calculate that the Chinese central bank bought 1600 tons Since the war in Ukraine, both of these central banks, the Saudi, which is the most influential country in the oil market, and the Chinese, the second largest economy globally, seem to be confident in what direction the gold market is headed.
	So that is the bottom line.
	We should pay attention to what they're doing, just like we should pay attention to what some of the big investors are doing, like Berkshire Hathaway.
	Warren Buffett is selling off his stock, massive amounts of sell-off of stock and going to cash.
	And then the number two guy there.
	Is he even selling the Berkshire Hathaway stock?
	He doesn't even want to have Berkshire Hathaway stock.
	These people want to get out of the market.
	And so this is the article from Zero Hedge.
	What would Hugo do?
	Hugo.
	This is a guy who made a fortune out of the hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic of Germany.
	And he begins with a quote in this article.
	This is from Economic Prism.
	Begins with a quote from Ludwig von Mises.
	He says, the wave-like movement affecting the economic system, the recurrence of periods of boom which are followed by periods of depression, is the unavoidable outcome of the attempts repeated again and again to lower the gross market rate of interest by means of credit expansion.
	There is no means of avoiding the financial collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion.
	The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as a result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, Or whether it'll come later, as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.
	You know, when they were creating the Federal Reserve System, J.P.
	Morgan was pushing the idea to senators before they did the The manipulated secretive vote on December the 23rd, just before the Christmas break, or during the Christmas break after a lot of people left town.
	One of the things he was saying was that we don't want to have these boom and bust cycles.
	So that's why we need to have a central bank.
	The critics of it were saying, and correctly so, that the central bank will only exacerbate the boom and bust cycles.
	And they'll do that because they're trying to manipulate the credit expansion.
	That's what Mises understood.
	Fed rate cuts are coming.
	If you believe this will levitate your stock portfolio, you are in for a big disappointment.
	The forthcoming collapse on Wall Street can be seen a country mile away, but only by those with their eyes open.
	Extreme stock market valuations, sky-high prices, an AI bubble that is running out of greater fools.
	Maybe Lala will buy some AI stock.
	All the while, the economy is slipping.
	She's got a lot of money.
	She made like $500 million in one month.
	She ought to put some of that stuff into the AI stock market.
	That's the hottest thing.
	Lala, you should get into that right now.
	All the while, the economy is slipping into recession.
	These factors, coupled with a behemoth government debt problem, are aligning for something much more than a run-of-the-mill bear market.
	By our estimation, a 50% top-to-bottom decline in the S&P 500 will be the minimum.
	Practically speaking, if the stock market goes down by 50% and then up by 50%, you haven't broken even.
	Yeah, by the way, you're still down by 25%.
	The Fed is already oiling the gears in preparation for a 25 basis point rate cut later this month.
	Yet, dollar debasement can only go so far.
	According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' own inflation calculator, $1 today has the purchasing power that 3 cents had in 1913.
	In other words, we've lost 97% of the dollar's value since they created the Federal Reserve.
	The dollar value has almost been completely destroyed over the last 111 years.
	Yeah, it's 11-D-1.
	And it's feeling like it is stretched thin over toast like Bilbo Baggins said he felt when he was 11-D-1.
	The looming recession and the stock market decline could be followed by a debt crisis, by a dollar crisis.
	At that point, inflation will run amonk, decreasing both the dollar and society as a whole.
	And this is a tale that we've seen repeated from time to time.
	Revolutionary France.
	We've seen it in Weimar Germany.
	21st century Zimbabwe.
	And everything in between, he says.
	For Americans trying to work, save, invest, and improve the lives and the security of their families, we have entered a dangerous territory.
	The head off, the fate of inflationary madness, Congress needs to just do one thing.
	They've got one job.
	Spending.
	And in order to stop this, they've got to do less spending.
	Think they're going to do it?
	No.
	Of course not.
	Hyperinflation, in the simplest sense, causes the currency to become effectively worthless.
	But not everybody was destroyed by hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic.
	Some people prospered and prospered in the extreme.
	Scroll down a little bit there and you'll see the picture of Time magazine.
	And that's the guy they had as man of the year in 1923.
	Hugo Stenez.
	I think is the way you pronounce his name.
	I guess it could be Steins, but I think it's Stinez.
	It'd be Frankenstein, Frankenstein.
	What's interesting about Hugo Stinez is that while most people were wiped out by hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic, his wealth grew and grew, and it grew so much that he became the richest man in Germany, and he earned the moniker the Inflation King.
	That will go to whoever is the next president.
	in the United States and they'll be in the negative title.
	They're going to hang that around whoever it is. It was also called Germany's evil genius. Our presidents will just be called evil not genius.
	The important thing to understand about Stennis' enormous wealth is that it wasn't so much the result of what he did during hyperinflation, but what he did just prior.
	He was born in Germany in 1870.
	He was already rich long before 1920.
	His family owned a coal mine and other industrial interests.
	See, that's the way you create wealth.
	Of course, you can't do that today.
	Even if you've got money, you can't own a coal mine.
	Courts will make it illegal.
	And industrial production, that's illegal as well, too.
	So that part of it is shut off to you.
	So you've only got, I don't know, you can cut hair and do nails in the service economy that we've got left here in the United States.
	And I'm not saying that's nothing.
	That's great to do it, but they're making it harder for us to make money still.
	As the paper mark ...was gradually losing its value following World War I. It didn't really start to lose its value until 1921.
	And after that, its loss of value got exponentially worse.
	Stennis used the gradual period in order to prepare.
	His hyperinflation playbook was generally straightforward.
	He used debt to load up on hard assets prior to hyperinflation.
	Then after hyperinflation, his hard assets retained their value in real terms while the price shot through the roof in nominal terms relative to the currency.
	The debts that he owed in terms of the paper mark that he borrowed dropped to the point of being insignificant.
	He was able to pay off all of his debts.
	The important lesson is that hard assets don't lose their value during hyperinflation the same way that the currency does.
	By 1924, just three years, he was able to pay off his debt with worthless paper marks.
	And at the same time, his assets had ballooned in value relative to the paper mark, making him the richest man in Germany.
	And then he abruptly died as a result of gallbladder operation at the age of 54.
	What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul?
	Or as Jesus said, you know, the rich man who says, look at this, I've got all this stuff, and I've got it all stored up in my barns, and I'm the richest man in Babylon or wherever, or the Weimar Republic, and God says, you fool, tonight your soul will be required of you.
	That's basically what happened to him.
	So you need to keep that in perspective.
	But we also need to provide, during these times of trouble, And as he's pointing out here, the lesson is not to go into debt trying to get stocks because he said the Fed has learned from what was done with the Weimar Republic.
	He said while the rate cuts are going to come later this month, there will again be a lag before their inflationary effects show themselves.
	This lag will be in the form of a recession and a declining stock market.
	And so Uh, if Hugo was alive today, what would you do?
	I said, well, we supposedly do what Warren Buffett is doing.
	What I mentioned before, you know, Warren Buffett's got hard assets, railroads, other businesses like that tangible capital.
	Uh, he's gone to cash.
	He's gotten out of all the stocks like Apple and other things like that.
	Um, and you know, all moving out of this AI bubble.
	And like I said, even the number two, doesn't he want to own Berkshire stock?
	Uh, so, um, he's setting a, Buffett is setting on $277 billion pile of cash for the Berkshire stock, but the other guy doesn't even want to have the Berkshire stock.
	This contrast illustrates the difference between the Fed chair, Jerome Powell today and the president of the German central bank back in 1921.
	Powell understands the need for the economy to stall out completely before resuming the next great wave of money printing.
	Whereas the Rudolf von Habenstein, 1921's central bank president of Germany, didn't understand that.
	Extreme inflation may be coming to the U.S., but investors and speculators who wish to game it like Stennis did over a hundred years ago by borrowing money to buy assets are asking for trouble.
	Like Buffett, we anticipate there'll first be a shakeout.
	Now is not the time to buy stocks on margin.
	You will get wiped out.
	You want to own hard assets and shares of good businesses with high return on tangible capital.
	How do you do that?
	Well, you want to hold cash, but more than cash, you want to hold money.
	You want to hold gold.
	Again, Tony Aardman at Wise Wolf Gold.
	He set up David Knight Gold.
	I'll take you to Tony.
	You can buy gold, silver, small or large amounts.
	You can also gradually save.
	Just like, um, the, uh, Saudi central bank, except in much smaller increments, I'm sure, uh, you can start with 50 bucks a month if you want.
	Right.
	Uh, but, uh, still essentially doing the same thing they're doing, accumulating it, gradually averaging the price out over time as it is expected by most people to, uh, go up.
	And so you can get into the buying group and you can get a group discount by being part of Wolfpack, or you can buy gold and silver straight out.
	You can also put your IRA into metals and he can help you to get that set up.
	David Knight Gold will take you to Tony Ardovan at Wise Wolf.
	And we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, I mentioned briefly, I didn't really comment on it, the fact that they've arrested the parent of this student who shot up a school in Georgia, killed several people.
	They've arrested him as well.
	And I think this is a very dangerous precedent.
	When I spoke about it before, I just briefly mentioned, I said, so what about the culpability of the police?
	What about the culpability of the school administrators?
	They were warned long in advance about this kid, like a year before, but they were also warned that day, a half hour before anything happened.
	The mother had called, nothing was done.
	Nothing was done by the school administrators.
	They know what class that kid is in.
	Nothing was done by the three cops that were there, but they're going to come after the parent.
	And why are they doing this?
	I think they're trying to set up a precedent, again, to make people not want to have a family, and I think to also come after the family, to attack the family.
	This is a war on the family in so many different ways.
	And so, when you look at the trial of this parent, the decision by Georgia prosecutors to criminally charge the father of a 14-year-old school shooter signals an emerging trend for addressing school shootings and prosecute the parents, not just the child.
	Authorities said that the gun that he used was a Christmas gift from his father.
	A senior lecturer at Regent University School of Law says that cases charging others with negligence for providing or allowing firearms are likely to continue.
	Still, it may be difficult to prove that a parent knew a child was likely to pose a danger to others.
	There is no question that That the school administrators knew, the police knew, they had been notified.
	Why, again, do they have no culpability, but only the parent?
	Well, because we don't want to punish the police and we don't want to punish the government schools, but we do want to punish parents, right?
	It's difficult to prove what's in the mind of a person.
	That's not a problem, though.
	I mean, we're embracing hate speech and hate crimes and all that.
	That's all about assuming that you know what's in the mind of the person.
	Things like that used to be just, you know, side issues that helped to provide motive, that helped the detectives to see who the suspects might be.
	But now they're crimes in and of themselves.
	Even though we can't tell what's in a person's mind, they're going to claim that they can.
	They're going to claim that the parents can.
	But again, even when they're warned a half hour ahead of time, they can't do anything.
	But there will be no culpability for our institutions, except for the institution of the family.
	And the LA Times is now saying it is almost shameful to want to have children.
	Do you see a pattern evolving here?
	I do.
	Now, this is coming from climate fear, that it is shameful to want to have children.
	And so the LA Times and others are talking about, you know, why would you want to do it?
	We're going to kill the planet.
	You know, humans, as the Gaia theory goes, humans are a virus and Gaia is Mother Earth.
	Mother Earth that is somehow sentient, right?
	And we're a human virus that's going to kill Mother Earth.
	But this is an excerpt from a person, Jade Sasser, an associate professor of the Department of Gender and Sexuality Studies at University of California, Riverside.
	When I was in college, they didn't have studies in that.
	They actually had real studies.
	You know, we had the electrical engineering department, we had the computer science, and we didn't have gender and sexuality studies.
	What a joke!
	She researches the relationships between reproductive justice, women's health, and climate change.
	In other words, she's a parasite on the taxpayer's purse.
	But she also has a podcast, Climate, Anxiety, and the Kid Question.
	And she has a podcast and a book.
	This is the title of her book, Climate, Anxiety, and the Kid Question, Deciding Whether to Have Children in an Uncertain Future.
	Well, as Christians, we don't live like that.
	You know, it was Martin Luther who said, if I knew that the world was going to end tomorrow, I would still plant a tree today.
	We are not privy to what is in the minds of other people.
	We are not privy to what the future holds.
	We know what we are called to do.
	We know what the right thing to do is.
	And I think many people are grateful for the shade that is provided by that tree, even though somebody was telling them that the world was going to end tomorrow.
	Like these chicken little Cassandras of the climate change movement.
	And then in this article, The LA Times talks to a 26-year-old Native American woman named Melanie.
	Of course, she's in California.
	But she says she idealizes having a big and happy family, but she's been scared to death by this climate change nonsense.
	But there are aspects of the world that give her pause, so she struggles with whether it is morally okay to have children.
	Isn't that sad?
	This is how they've gaslit people.
	They make you hate yourself.
	You have to deny your skin color and all the rest of the stuff.
	You have to hate your children.
	You have to deny bringing children into this world.
	It is such a death cult.
	It is so satanic, isn't it?
	I think I may not have children, although I do want them, she said, just because with all the things we see going on in the world, it just seems unfair.
	To bring someone into this against their will.
	This is the mindset of the atheist, right?
	I don't really have any purpose for life.
	What is the purpose of life anyway?
	It's brutal, it's disgusting, and then you die.
	Why would I bring anybody into that?
	Why would I create life?
	Well, we don't live that way because we know the truth.
	Unfortunately, they don't hurt feelings about climate change.
	include a general sense of powerlessness, and listen to this, a lack of control over other people's actions.
	Do you notice that?
	Does that give you a clue as to the motives of the people who are lying to you and propagandizing you?
	It gives you personal power to create a government that can control other people, right?
	Guess what?
	That government's about controlling you.
	The government is already controlling you if they've got you fearing that, if they got you demanding that.
	She has a sense of powerlessness because she can't control other people's actions.
	But hey, the government could.
	Let's get the government involved in all this stuff.
	And quite frankly, this is what has happened to both the left and to the right.
	To the Lala Harris supporters and to the Trump supporters, they both want to use government to control other people to their ends.
	They're not interested in persuading anybody.
	They're not interested in free speech.
	They want coercion.
	They want control of speech, control of other people's lives.
	It's just different things that they want controlled.
	And so both the left and the right want a dictator that is going to make everything right.
	That's what she's looking at.
	She's like, I don't want to have kids because I can't control other people's actions.
	And so that translates into her fear about parenthood.
	But see, that's the whole presidential scam of the Democrats and Republicans.
	You're going to be able to control other people's lives to put out the problems that you think exist, whether or not those problems are real or not.
	Now, you don't even want to hear it if somebody disagrees with you.
	Well, this was a story on live action.
	I just want my baby back, says one Reddit poster, as she talks about the traumatic experience of using the abortion pill.
	Yesterday, I talked about, that's a blurry picture of the baby, the baby that she aborted.
	I talked yesterday about the emergency room visits.
	And how they had four cohorts of people in this study.
	And when they looked at serious emergency room visits and how they had increased over 11 years, it increased.
	Serious emergency visits increased for everybody.
	Unfortunately, you know, that's a tale about what is happening to us as a society with our food and drugs.
	That's really coming from the FDA, that war against our health, I think.
	But emergency room visits went up.
	But when you look at what happened, it went up like 20% for women who had babies.
	For women who were not even pregnant, it went up 100%.
	And it went up, I think it was 400 and something percent for women who had surgical abortions.
	So four times as much as that.
	And then it went up over 4,000% for women who had abortions with a pill.
	It's a very dangerous thing.
	They're now allowing women to take this abortion pill without seeing a physician.
	And the other side of this is that when the women have abortions, they see the baby that comes out.
	And that was the experience of this woman.
	She went to social media.
	She showed two photos of her 10-week-old deceased baby.
	20 minutes ago, she said, I had a medical abortion at home.
	by the pill.
	And it was the most painful thing I have ever gone through.
	You know, Abby Johnson, who was head of Planned Parenthood murder joint in Houston, Texas, she's now a big opponent of it.
	But she had, when she was still working there, they casually gave her an abortion pill and she took it, took it with her and went home with it.
	She said she thought she was going to die and there was nobody there to help her.
	She had not been warned about how bad it was, but she talked at length about that.
	But she said the most painful thing that she's ever gone through And I'm so sorry, little Bean," she called the baby Bean.
	Bean was moving its legs and heart, and his heart was still beating, when he came out in one push.
	She said, first my water broke, then another push later, the baby came out quite quickly, along with big clots.
	I immediately felt relief, so I grabbed a glove and finished in the toilet, and the baby was in there.
	As soon as I pulled the baby out, the legs were moving and I could feel the heartbeat in my hand.
	Pull that up a little bit so people can see that picture there.
	Yeah.
	Heartbeat slowly faded and stopped moving.
	She watched the baby die in her hand.
	So she said, the most traumatic thing I've ever experienced.
	I feel like I wasn't given all the information I needed going into it.
	I was told it would feel like a period, but my experience was much worse.
	Definitely the most pain I've ever felt in my whole life.
	And I wish that I had been prepared for it.
	See, they lie to women.
	And they don't even do an exam to tell them if the baby is too big and it's going to cause complications or whatever.
	She also said, I literally gave birth and nobody told me that it would be like that.
	The contractions were so intense it was unbearable.
	About 15 minutes before it was out, I started telling my partner to call someone because I couldn't handle it anymore.
	Again, you know, Abby Johnson was by herself.
	People she worked with, Planned Parenthood, no big deal here, take a pill.
	I was not informed that the fetus would be whole, so I was quite shocked when it came out.
	I don't think I was prepared well enough for the entire experience.
	I feel like they sugarcoated all of it to make it seem easy, but it was one of the hardest things I've ever been through." Yeah, they don't give people the truth, do they?
	Well, we have a pastor who was trying to give people the truth, and he was arrested for reading the Bible aloud in Seattle.
	They made it illegal.
	Senior counsel at First Liberty Institute said, however, he's now had a big victory.
	The situation began in June 24, 2022.
	He said, what had happened was that the city of Seattle effectively made reading the Bible aloud a crime.
	And it first occurred on June 24, 2022.
	I don't know if that date means anything to you, but that was the date that the Supreme Court rendered the Dobbs decision, which voided Roe v. Wade And I'll say it affirmed the 10th Amendment, which Roe v. Wade was a denial of the 10th Amendment.
	They correctly made that decision.
	It's all about the 10th Amendment.
	It's not about choices and exceptions, as Trump says.
	It's about the 10th Amendment, stupid!
	Read your Constitution, Trump, sometime.
	Get off of social media and pick up a pocket Constitution and just read the Bill of Rights and you can just do that part of it.
	Anyway, he said he was reportedly preaching during a huge protest against the decision, the Dobbs decision.
	So there's a protest going on in downtown Seattle.
	And he thought it'd be a good opportunity to share the gospel with the people who are hopping mad because they're not going to be allowed to kill babies.
	Well, again, I don't know if he thought that, you know, he knows he's going to get some pushback on this, and he certainly did.
	So he took his Bible and he goes out there to read the Bible.
	He has very earnest pro-life beliefs, but that was not his purpose.
	He just really wanted to share the gospel.
	So he's not out there talking about what God says about life and when life begins and his role in it.
	No, he's not taking that on at all.
	He just wants to go, hey, there's a big crowd.
	I'll go tell them the good news about the gospel.
	These people seem to be upset about something.
	Let him tell them that, you know, God has a free gift of eternal life.
	They didn't want to hear it.
	He started reading from the book of John.
	And it was not received well.
	Some protesters started to crowd in around him.
	They started saying some inflammatory, derogatory things, made him feel uncomfortable.
	He said, so he moved off a few feet away to a new spot.
	But then at that spot, some protester grabbed his Bible and started ripping pages out of it.
	And then he said the situation got physical.
	Uh, he grabbed another Bible and he started, he resumed reading.
	And that's, he said, when Antifa members got involved, they physically picked him up.
	And they carried him around a block before dropping him on the cement.
	Despite the pain and the danger, he found another spot and he started preaching once more.
	This guy is like the apostle Paul.
	That's when he was again confronted and reportedly knocked down.
	He said the police intervened at that point, but rather than helping him, they said he was the problem and they arrested him.
	Yeah, this is what I've seen.
	When Karen and I got married in 1980, I graduated in December of 79.
	We got married in the middle of January, and then I thought it'd be a great idea to go to England in the middle of January.
	And it was.
	We had a great time, and we did a lot of free stuff.
	Museums, we went to House of Commons, and one of the things that we did, we went to Hyde Park, where on Sundays, people would go up and they would bring something to stand on, you know, get their little soapbox, a proverbial soapbox, and then stand on it, and they would talk in Hyde Park, and usually it was about politics or religion, you know, the kind of stuff that gets people angry, the kind of stuff we talk about.
	So, they talk about politics or religion, and the police would stand around to protect the people who were on the soapboxes.
	Nope, you can't do anything.
	And when we were there, people would get very agitated.
	We just kind of walked around and listened to what people were talking about.
	And they had some Christian preachers who were there, and there was just a few Muslims at that time.
	That was in 1980.
	Yeah, 44 years ago.
	And there weren't that many Muslims there, but the few that were there got kind of...
	agitated and angry, but they were debating, they were yelling and shouting back, you know, and the guy up on the on the little soapbox would engage them in debate.
	That's fine.
	That's, you know, you can have passion about things as long as you keep it about a discussion.
	But there wasn't the police were there to keep it from becoming physical.
	That's what's happening here.
	And now what we see happening, we've seen it in the UK.
	Where, when somebody is now doing that in the UK, well, let me back up and say between 1980 and 2001, so 20 years, so we're now 44 years.
	At the midpoint, we took our sons to the UK and we went to Hyde Park, said, hey, you got to see this, this is great.
	And there was a Christian who was standing on a soapbox preaching.
	And all of a sudden, you know, he's getting a big crowd of Muslim men.
	And, uh, they're there and they're angry and they're yelling and shouting at him.
	It's just, that's okay.
	But it was starting to get, uh, really heated.
	Uh, and I noticed that, um, there were a lot of P police that were kind of towards the back and a lot of police were coming up and they were talking into the lapel, you know, in the microphone, other people, we may have a problem here, you know, And so I just said, let's go somewhere else.
	I don't want to be here when it hits the fan.
	But now go another 20 years, okay?
	And the police, instead of protecting the person who is speaking, they arrest the Christian pastor.
	And that's what's happening in Seattle here.
	So the police arrested this guy.
	Pastor Meineke knew he had a First Amendment right to share his views at his attorney.
	So he wasn't just willing to walk away, and he tried to reason with the police officers, but they arrested him, and they held him for several hours in a detaining cell until after the abortion rally had ended, thwarting his opportunity to share the gospel, they said.
	Kellum said the reason for the arrest was based on a policy that the police had, that if there was a hostile reaction to somebody speaking, then that speaker would be asked to leave or stop their activity.
	So if they hate your speech, then you get arrested, right?
	Not the hateful people.
	Instead of dealing with the individuals who are actually committing crimes, they're focusing on a speaker who is really doing nothing wrong, said Cullum.
	And here, Pastor Meineke doing nothing but reading the Bible.
	Two days later, he was at it again, and he was arrested at a separate event.
	This guy keeps on coming.
	You can't stop a guy who's in the right and keeps on coming.
	That was the motto of the early Texas Rangers.
	It's also the motto of Christian street preachers.
	Since these occurrences, Meineke has been challenging what unfolded and recently scored what First Liberty is calling a complete victory for the pastor.
	The judge granted him permanent injunctive relief from the unconstitutional police policy, gave him compensatory damages for the wrongful arrests, and nominal damages for the constitutional violations, along with reasonable attorney fees and expenses, said the press release.
	The police have been put on notice that if someone is peacefully speaking, you need to acknowledge those rights, said the attorney.
	You need to allow them to go forth with their First Amendment freedoms just like everybody else, because you as a police officer took an oath to the Constitution as a condition of your office, and that's what you took an oath to do because of the First Amendment.
	Meineke discussed the alleged ordeal on Twitter.
	He explained numerous police officers arrested him as he was reading the Bible in a park.
	He said the Seattle Police Department has enough resources to send 10 police officers to arrest a preacher reading his Bible in a public park.
	Because it's such a horrible crime now.
	And in the UK, they have enough officers to arrest one woman who is silently praying on sidewalk away from an abortion clinic.
	They've done it multiple times, even when they're told by the court, by the judge, not to do it.
	The man goes by the name Seattle Preacher on X. He included a video of these proclamations show the police department officer standing by as someone reads scripture aloud and then arresting him.
	So we have Pope Francis saying, I don't know if Trump or Harris is the lesser evil.
	Well, I think I know who the greater evil is.
	I think it's the Pope himself.
	This guy, I mean, LifeSite News, which is Catholic, has a big issue with him as well.
	LifeSite News is quoting Bible to refute the Pope.
	If people start fighting over whose religion is more important, he says, or start saying, mine is a true religion, yours isn't true, where does that lead?
	Where does that lead, says the Pope?
	Well, I guess that leads to you getting arrested by the police at Speaker's Corner or in Seattle, that's where it is.
	Is the truth worth the struggle?
	Where is the truth determined?
	Is it determined by the Pope?
	He said, somebody in the audience said, what leads to destruction?
	He says, exactly!
	We're talking about trouble.
	Trouble right here.
	With a capital T and that rhymes with D and that stands for destruction.
	He says, all religions are a path to reach God.
	They are, to use a comparison, like different languages, different dialects to get there.
	No.
	No, that's not the Christian view.
	Because you have just denied Christ.
	You are in opposition to Christ.
	You are anti-Christ when you say that.
	And I don't care what title you've got.
	Because Christ said, I am the way, the truth, and the life.
	No man comes to the Father but by me.
	But that's not what Francis says, or Bergoglio, or whatever his real name is.
	It's Jesuit.
	He says, we all are children of God, but my God is more important than yours, he said, dramatically.
	Is this true?
	Is there only one God and we, our religions, are like languages trying to reach God?
	Well, yeah, the Logos, Logos, is what we're trying to reach.
	He said some are Sikh, some Muslim, some Hindu, some Christian, but they're just different paths.
	Do you understand?
	And the interesting thing that Breitbart picked up was that in the English language translation of his speech, they downplayed a lot of this stuff.
	While in Italian, he said, all religions are a path to reach God.
	In the English translation, he said, religions are seen as paths trying to reach God.
	Well, in a sense, that's true, right?
	Religion is about you earning your way to God, but that's not what our relationship to God is about.
	The wages of our work, the wages of our sin are death, but eternal life is a free gift from Christ.
	Don't listen to this guy.
	Read it for yourself.
	You know, Jesus did what we're unable to do.
	That's what religions are about.
	Religions are about, well, I need to do this, and I need to do more of the good stuff, just like what Trump was saying.
	Well, you know, they said, you've done a lot of things.
	Do you think you need forgiveness from God?
	No, I don't need forgiveness.
	I've done a lot of really good things.
	Michael Bloomberg said the same thing.
	You have a lot of billionaires who, when they reach God, are going to find that all the things that they're so proud of, that they think have cancelled out all of their murders and the rest of the stuff that they did, they're going to find out that no, no, Christ cancelled it out.
	Christ did what you can't do.
	He offers that as a free gift.
	But these people don't want it.
	They want to earn it on their own.
	They want to earn it on their own.
	It's like somebody giving their kid the keys to a sports car or something and says, well, thanks, Dad, but here's 20 bucks.
	I don't want you to give that to me.
	They don't understand the value of what's being given to them.
	And they think they can do it themselves.
	No.
	Rebellious man couldn't do it.
	And that's why Christ did it.
	And you're not going to have, if other people are in rebellion to God.
	You know, Jesus brought peace on earth.
	He didn't stop all the wars.
	No, what he did was he brought peace between God and man.
	But if these people are fighting with God, and you're at peace with God, they're going to be fighting with you as well.
	I just understand that.
	They're going to be arresting you, doing other things, and it's going to only accelerate.
	And what the Pope is doing is he's trying to create a one-world religion and, you know, present us.
	He's going to be the peacemaker, he says.
	He's going to be accepting to everybody.
	And those of us who say there's one way, we are going to be the ones who are hateful.
	He said, some Sikh, some Muslim, some Hindu, some Christian, but they're different paths.
	But in the English translation, it says, some Sikh, some Muslim, some Hindu, some Christian, leaving aside any reference to a path.
	He's just a globalist solving a global religion, but it's going to be, that global religion is going to be used to punish you if you have a different opinion.
	There will be no tolerance.
	So, again, this is, you know, Breitbart, LifeSite, all talking about this, quoting, in fact, there's one mediator between God and man, the man Jesus Christ who gave himself as a ransom for all.
	You know, God uses evil for his own purposes.
	When the Pope comes out and says, yeah, anybody can get to God in any of these religions, well, that gets Breitbart quoting Scripture.
	It's good to see it.
	And you've got priests doing the same thing, quoting Scripture, because of the rank of Disbelief and rebellion of this Jesuit regoglio they call Pope Francis.
	LifeSite News said in the near future a new rite of mass is going to be introduced for Amazonia with the Pope's approval which, as is to be feared based on previous experience, will contain or at least adapt pagan elements of indigenous culture.
	Yeah, he's gonna syncretize it with whatever the culture is there.
	But what is our culture?
	You know, we can look at what is happening in the Amazon, we can look at, you know, whatever he's going to do with his religious act, but I think this is really telling.
	We have Tinder, which as LifeSiteNews points out, is a hookup app, right?
	Casual sex, people finding each other.
	And they've now donated thousands of dollars to Planned Parenthood, and they point out there's a lot of these other dating platforms that are doing the same things, pushing casual sex, and then tying it in together, the promiscuity, followed by child sacrifice.
	You know, that was part of most of the religions in early society.
	You know, they would have something like Ashtaroth, or there's Sheer Apol, or whatever.
	They would have these, you know, sexual goddesses or whatever.
	And they have free casual sex.
	And then later on in the year, they would have a Moloch.
	When you had the baby, now you can get rid of it and you sacrifice to Moloch so you can have prosperity.
	That's the same model that's going on now with Twitter and Planned Parenthood.
	The same thing that was happening with the, with Ashcroft and Moloch.
	You know, the difference is, is that they burned the babies alive.
	We rip them apart while they're alive.
	But it's the same kind of partnership that we've seen throughout all of this.
	Casual sex and debauchery combined with the murder of children that come after it.
	And now this is just happening with these apps and with Planned Parenthood.
	But it always follows the same pattern.
	Bumble, Match are also giving massive amounts of money to Planned Parenthood, thinking that they can remove the consequences of what they're doing.
	Well, the consequences are there.
	Even if we get forgiveness, God will train us with the consequences for what we do.
	But there is forgiveness.
	There is mercy.
	And some people don't want you to look for it.
	That's the important thing.
	Look for it.
	Accept that free gift.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now.
	Yeah, good job!
	And you want to know something else?

▲