Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 10, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:03:10

The David Knight Show - 09/10/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 10th of September.
	Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, tonight is the big event!
	And so it is a pageant, and it's a lot of theater.
	We're going to start with that.
	We're going to show you the other theater.
	We're going to show you the polls back and forth, as I said yesterday.
	It truly is a horse race now, and you can bet on it.
	Not just in Vegas, but you can bet on it with the futures markets.
	And so you'll want to watch it tonight so that you can get those bets placed.
	Maybe you can win some money.
	We're going to start with that.
	We also have some very strange... We now have the Neo Robot is now spending some time in people's homes.
	Yeah, we are starting to live in some really strange times.
	We'll talk about the implications of it even from their own PR video.
	There's some huge implications about this.
	Of course, and we'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Yes, tonight's big event is the news.
	I'm here with my wife, Mary.
	We're going to talk about the news.
	Yes, tonight's big event is...
	It's like the Super Bowl, the Grand Slam, WrestleMania all rolled into one.
	As a matter of fact, we got a solicitation for an interview from a book company and they're selling this book.
	Trump's sandbox.
	This is for kids.
	I like this.
	It's like, uh, no, no, we're not going to do that.
	But you know, you can fit so many different people into that sandbox.
	It truly is amazing.
	It kind of reminds me, and this was sent to me by a listener, Dr. Fauci, how a boy from Brooklyn became America's favorite doctor.
	And if you look at this, there's a Fauci, and I guess he's thinking back That time in Bedford Falls where he was working at the pharmacy place.
	Fauci's pharmacy, as a matter of fact.
	It shows on here.
	And as a delivery boy, I guess.
	And in his version of the story, he's the one who actually puts the poison in consciously and takes it to the people.
	It isn't that he stops the pharmacist who's grieving over his lost son.
	No, Dr. Fauci actually puts the poison in and delivers it.
	Science here.
	I got some science for you right here.
	Just what you wanted.
	Well, anyway, we got the Trump sandbox.
	And of course, as you watch the debate, if you do, because you know, you want to get your bets in on the futures market.
	If you watch it, just keep this in mind.
	Pageant.
	We need a theme, a song, some visuals.
	We need, you know, it's a pageant.
	It's a, it's, it's a pageant.
	It's a pageant.
	That's what it is.
	It's Mr. Merrick in your bird park.
	Yeah, it's Miss America near Burke Park or it's Miss America near Donald Trump.
	And I don't know if he's going to be checking out Lala Harris in the dressing room beforehand like he used to do at the other parties, but she's got her own thing going.
	She's got a guy dressed up in a wig and high heels and a podium and lights and all this other kind of stuff, you know, just to help Lala to get into the bed.
	They've got to go all kinds of extra preparation.
	It's what happens when you pick people like Lala and Biden who can't tie their shoes to be your spokesperson that's there.
	But I think it's not just wag the dog.
	But it is also what Thomas Massey had to say about the whole budget process.
	This is political theater.
	I'm going to call out both sides right here.
	It's all posturing.
	It's fake fighting.
	We all know where it ends up.
	This is Groundhog Day.
	I don't care if the Democrat is the speaker or Republican is the speaker.
	We always get a CR in September, and then we get an omnibus.
	Sometimes there's a twist on that.
	We might get the omnibus before Christmas.
	But if we're not good, it comes after Christmas.
	But that's what's going to happen.
	And in the meantime, it's political theater.
	It's good theater.
	We've got great writers.
	I wish they'd just come up with a new plot.
	It's the same plot every fiscal year.
	What should we be doing?
	It's already been discussed.
	We should have done 12 separate bills.
	We should have done 12 separate bills.
	But again, whether Democrats are in control or Republicans are in control, we never do the 12 separate bills.
	Why do we always spend at least as much as we did last year, and why do we never cut spending?
	It's because Democrats want to grow the welfare state, and Republicans want to grow the military-industrial complex.
	And we're eventually going to get together, and they're both going to go up.
	I guarantee it.
	And both parties are just fine letting the bureaucrats do their thing, which should be our thing, according to Article 1.
	Well, he nailed it, didn't he?
	The bureaucracies do their thing, which is really supposed to be our thing.
	As I've said for the longest time, they've abdicated everything they do.
	We don't have taxation without representation.
	We have regulation without representation.
	So he says, yeah, this bill, this omnibus bill, it should have been 12 separate bills.
	I guess I could say that about the presidential election.
	I should have started with 12 separate candidates.
	But they had already predetermined what they were going to do.
	We wound up with an omnibus election.
	They just put these two in the pot and you're going to choose from them.
	End of story.
	Yeah, we should have had separate elections.
	We should have had debates.
	We should have had open ballots.
	We should, uh, when we're looking at these, well, they're not even talking about issues.
	It's all about their personalities.
	That's the other thing about it.
	It's become such a high school student council melodrama.
	Disgust me.
	And I'm just as tired of this process as Thomas Massey is.
	You can call me black pill, but it's, it's, um, it's experience.
	I've seen this before over and over again.
	It's a bad rerun.
	It's a bad remake.
	Straight out of Hollywood.
	Wag the dog number 21 or whatever, you know?
	I mean, it's ridiculous what is happening with this.
	We have this, we should have, as he said, you know, we should have had 12 separate bills, he said.
	See, part of the problem is, as they talk about the omnibus bill, they put everything in there, and it's like, well, you take everything or you leave everything.
	And that's the way it is with the presidential candidates.
	And that's the way it is with everything in Washington, quite frankly.
	Even if we had 12 separate bills, Washington isn't the place.
	This is where I would have a slight disagreement with Thomas Massey.
	Washington's not the place to get most things done.
	And I think he would say that as well.
	I mean, he understands what's going on in the bureaucracy.
	He understands that Washington is involved in things that they should not be involved in.
	So, I think he understands that.
	See, we should have 50 different Governments that are making different decisions about stuff, where we actually have something of a say.
	And then subdivide that into a lot of more local governments where we have more of a say.
	And until you start working towards that, all the rest of this stuff, this pageant, this Wrestlemania, this Grand Slam, this Super Bowl, this is all just a distraction.
	In the same way that these debates over the amount of money that they're going to put us into debt, They're just going to conjure up the bills, right?
	We're not even going to run a printing press.
	We just reimagine the numbers.
	Just poof.
	I just put it on the computer.
	As I said the other day, you're printing a lot of money.
	The Fed chair at the time said, well, we're not actually printing the money.
	We couldn't do that.
	I said, yeah.
	Think about how much paper that would take.
	You can't even imagine it.
	So now it has to be paperless.
	The paperless fiat currency.
	It's got nothing.
	Not even the paper is tangible.
	It's all just conjured up.
	It's magic money.
	That's the MMT, the magic money theory.
	I know they say it's modern monetary theory, but it's magic money theory.
	They just conjure it up.
	And it's like Mickey Mouse and the Sorcerer's Apprentice, you know?
	It's out of control, and the bureaucracy just keeps bringing in more water, and we're underwater already.
	But that doesn't stop them.
	And of course, that won't be the discussion tonight.
	It'll be back and forth.
	It'll be personal.
	It'll be vindictive.
	So for six weeks, Lala's campaign has been running circles around Donald Trump's efforts, says RealClearPolitics.
	They've raised tons of money, energized their base.
	Five hundred million dollars the first couple of weeks?
	So far then in August, another three hundred and fifty?
	Folks, that's obscene.
	It's criminal.
	It truly is, as H.L.
	Mencken said, an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	And people are just buying influence with her.
	And when you stop and think about it, if they're going to spend billions of dollars to buy these presidential candidates and the group that's around them, then what does that tell you about what they're going to spend?
	Because they don't spend just 10 times.
	They spend 20, 30 times what they actually take in.
	That's why so much money is flowing into Washington.
	The best investment you can make is in a politician, in terms of return on investment.
	So that's going to turn out two or three trillion dollars being passed around, as we have seen.
	That was what the whole Inflation Reduction Act was about.
	Biden just recently said, well, okay, that was the Inflation Reduction Act.
	We worked on the Green New Deal, the Inflation Reduction Act.
	We should have called it what it really was, and he abruptly stops.
	I told him not to talk about it being the Green New Deal.
	Well, it's not even the Green New Deal.
	It's the Green New Steel.
	Massive transfer of wealth.
	Trillions of dollars to people like Elon Musk, your hero, if you're conservative, I guess, and I'm not the listeners who listen to this program, but if you, if Elon Musk is your hero, you would have turned this program off a long time ago, just like he did on Twitter.
	But yeah, it's these people who, he's going to become the world's first trillionaire.
	He's on the path to do that in just a couple of years, especially because of these battery energy storage sites that are going to be used to back up the unreliable, unstable solar and wind power, these battery energy storage sites.
	And it still won't be reliable, but it will be very, very, very expensive, as I pointed out yesterday.
	If you look at the cost of these things, you're looking at paying probably 28 times what you're paying right now.
	That's how you're going to own nothing.
	You'll own nothing.
	You won't even be able to get electricity.
	The irony of all this stuff is that right now, you know, they're selling the solar panels and stuff at below cost, what it costs them.
	Below cost for the price, below cost for the energy that goes into it.
	It doesn't make any sense, but hey, you know, you can get some of your own power off the grid.
	So that's not a bad idea.
	It's just the grid is being destroyed.
	Make sure you're not dependent on the grid.
	That's all I can say.
	Whatever you do, don't depend on the grid because they're destroying that.
	You know, these sources of power are more expensive for sure, but you can get independent of the grid and that's a benefit for you one way or the other.
	The time has come for Trump to make the sale, says Real Clear Politics.
	Despite his lack of focus and Harris's early momentum, polls continue to show a close race.
	Why is that?
	Because she is so radically left.
	That's the real aspect of it.
	By the way, I got a kick out of the way he said theater.
	That's the way I used to.
	Karen was from New York, and it was a source of endless amusement for me to listen to her, her heavy New York accent.
	It was very endearing.
	I got a kick out of it.
	And she got a kick out of the way that I talked as well.
	She thought it was funny that I said theater.
	And she said, well, yeah.
	And I said, well, how do y'all say it?
	Theater.
	Theater.
	That's how she says it.
	So yeah, he's not from New York either.
	He's from Kentucky.
	But anyway, we had, I guess opposites attract to some degree, but we definitely were soulmates and virtually everything else except the way we talked.
	Debates are more often lost than won, he says.
	And it really is.
	This has been Trump's election to lose from the very beginning.
	And he's working really hard and very diligently to lose it because he just keeps coming out with vicious personal attacks.
	Which, if he wants to make that kind of stuff and make those points, it ought to be done by surrogates.
	But no, he's got to do it himself.
	Why?
	Because he's a deeply wounded narcissist.
	Incapable of acting, except out of his own perceived self-interest.
	And that's the problem.
	He perceives it as his self-interest.
	I don't think he's going to listen to any advisors.
	So for Trump, this person said it real clear politics, what he needs is a chance to unveil a strong, disciplined message.
	Well, he doesn't have a strong, he doesn't have a message and it's not strong and it's not disciplined.
	You know, his message depends on Yeah, he's over here focusing on minutiae.
	He doesn't have what George H.W.
	Bush said, that vision thing.
	He doesn't have that vision thing.
	For instance, right, instead of a broad economic policy, where we need to go, what he does is he focuses so much on the minutiae of no tax on tips.
	Oh, okay, well, that's an economic policy?
	No, I mean it is some detail that would be there, detail that Of course, he's not going to necessarily deliver on, but she jumps on it as well.
	And as I said, if both of them agree on it, and the Democrats and Republicans agree, let's just do it.
	And in California, you had Republicans call the Democrats bluff.
	They said, let's do the no tax on tips.
	And the Democrats shut that down.
	And so that's really what Mike Johnson should do.
	As a matter of fact, though, the bigger issue, see, it's not no tax on tips.
	The bigger issue is why are you growing the IRS, giving it $80 billion when its budget is $13 billion?
	Why are you giving it seven times its current budget?
	What's that about?
	How are you weaponizing both parties?
	Weaponizing the IRS against us while they say, oh well, we won't do any tax on tips.
	All you waiters and waitresses and all the working people out there, shouldn't you be happy about this?
	And it only affects a small portion of them, of course.
	A small portion of those of us who work on this.
	But what's the economic policy?
	Is the economic policy to say that we're going to have massive tariffs of 60%?
	That's not an economic policy.
	That's chaos and destruction.
	First of all, he could never do something.
	It's absurd.
	He could never do something that large.
	And if he did some kind of a shock to the system, and you know, he needs to talk about why we need to gradually transition to no internal taxes and only taxes at the border, but it's got to be a gradual transition.
	And if he jumps into this all at once, of course, the big issue is adding those taxes and not taking off what we currently have.
	Which, if you're going to do taxes at the border, tariffs, why do you need to grow the internal revenue service?
	Why do you need to grow that by a factor of seven?
	See, he doesn't address that.
	None of this stuff is real.
	The message is phony.
	It simply is.
	This is phony from both of them.
	They don't have any policies.
	They're not strong.
	They're not disciplined.
	They're not principled.
	They don't have a plan.
	There is no plan.
	The plan is I need to be in the White House.
	That's it.
	This is like some childish two year old.
	Well, the plan is I just need to be in the White House because I can save you and she'll kill you or vice versa.
	So debate messaging should reflect the campaign's central theme.
	He says, assuming a campaign has one, he says.
	That's right.
	Does it?
	Yeah.
	I don't know what Trump's theme is.
	Now I do know what Lala's theme is.
	Kill the babies.
	Kill the babies, women, and free yourselves from children.
	And it doesn't matter what you have to do with the babies to kill them.
	Just don't pay any attention.
	Don't look at it.
	Don't look at it.
	And of course, the Republicans' plan is to just passively step by and say, we're not for as much of whatever the Democrats are for as they are.
	We're for less of whatever they want.
	That's their plan.
	A little bit less.
	A little bit less.
	So he says, the first words out of Trump's mouth should frame the election as a choice between his record and the Biden-Harris record.
	This could be Trump's version of Ronald Reagan's famous debate line, are you better off than you were four years ago?
	But that's not, if he's got a theme, his theme is revenge, right?
	That's perhaps his theme.
	So she's about killing babies.
	He's about getting personal revenge.
	It's great.
	And quite frankly, that didn't work out that well with Hillary.
	Her theme was, I'm with her.
	It's my turn.
	And basically that's what Trump is doing this time around.
	It's my turn to come back.
	You're with me.
	It's all about me, right?
	Me, me, me.
	Trump also needs to make the case that Harris is too far left.
	That should be pretty easy.
	But again, is he going to want to talk about any policy?
	He should cite specific policies that she has supported.
	Biden went along with the progressive left, but Harris will be their champion.
	You could say something like that.
	It's what RealClearPolitics says.
	So Biden just went along with them, but she's a true believer.
	She was out there in front.
	She was the most liberal senator at the time, ranking.
	She wants to ban cars.
	She wants to do HillaryClear.
	She wants to do all of the radical, radical Marxist leftist things that are out there.
	And I would just say, if I was advising him, I'd just tell everybody that la la is Biden's leftover.
	She's left and she wants to be over you.
	She's the leftover from the Biden administration.
	Or you could say she's Willie Brown, pass me around.
	Anyway, you could just attack her basis of getting into politics and what her success has already been about.
	Willie Brown, pass me around.
	The most important thing that Trump should do is to shut up, says RealClearPolitics.
	The limits, and this is why this fight was so important, it's why she fought but then gave up.
	She wanted those mics open so she could hector him and so get him flustered and so that he could basically hang himself by what he says.
	By shutting the mic off to try to protect Biden from getting flustered, it actually worked greatly to Trump's advantage in the first debate.
	And so they decide, well, we'll take the opposite approach because she can heckle him and she can laugh at him and all the rest of the stuff.
	And they didn't.
	So now there's going to be time limits and there's going to be microphones off when it's, when you're finished speaking, your time is up and that should help him.
	That should give him a little bit of discipline perhaps, or at least make it seem like he's got a more disciplined message.
	There is no reason for him to bring up his criminal cases.
	These are potential traps that Harris will have ready-made retorts for all of them.
	She's already telegraphed that.
	I'm a prosecutor.
	I'll lock up people like you, you felon.
	Right?
	She'll goad him on all this.
	And, um, you know, you and I know what these trials are about.
	Um, and so, uh, what do you got to do if she takes that line?
	He ought to say, yeah, we know what it's about.
	We know that it's about political persecution.
	And you've had a lot of experience with this, haven't you?
	Look at what you did to David Daleiden when he exposed Planned Parenthood and its murder for hire.
	That would be a knock it out of the park approach.
	He could slam this political persecution thing down her throat and the abortion issue at the same time, showing it for what it is.
	Trafficking and murder and baby parts.
	But he won't do that, of course.
	Well, um, anyway, Harris expects him to be a rambling, disruptive character, but if instead he's rational and concise and his attacks are coherent and focused, dream on.
	Uh, it says not his usual word salad of overstatements and distractions.
	He could force Harris off of her game.
	Uh, so Harris should employ two techniques that could throw Trump off the stride.
	One of them is humor.
	Make a joke and just laugh incessantly.
	And they don't have to answer any questions, right?
	Just laugh it all off.
	That's not a bad strategy for her.
	It's reprehensible, but it's not a bad strategy.
	Neither Hillary Clinton nor Joe Biden effectively used wit against Trump in previous debates.
	See, they should have read Hillary Clinton, you know, even Loved the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky, and that's one of his key rules.
	Ridicule is the most effective weapon, he said.
	He said there is no defense against it.
	That would be perfect for her, to ridicule Trump over whatever.
	She'd make it up, even.
	But she ridicules him and laughs at him.
	That would be very effective.
	The second is for Harris to make her points in the form of questions.
	As a lawyer and a senator, she knows how to do this.
	Nothing prohibits candidates from posing questions to the audience in the form of statements.
	Like Ronald Reagan.
	Are you better off than you were four years ago?
	That's essentially what they're talking about.
	So the other thing that I find interesting, of course, is the calendar of all this.
	And of course that was a big part of the deliberate orchestrated thing to put Trump in, get Biden out, put Lala Harris against him.
	That was all orchestrated for a very long time.
	They planned all this stuff.
	And so when we look at these late starting dates, we have in about a week, early voting begins in about seven states in about a week to 10 days.
	North Carolina would have started already, except for the RFK lawsuit, which by the way, in an update, as I said on Friday, Associated Press said that RFK Jr.
	got kicked off.
	Well, that was the first judge said that.
	Then later in the day, you had an appeals court judge who said, no, he's on.
	And they never updated their article.
	They just left it as, uh, he's, uh, he's, he's still, he was still on the ballot.
	The judge said you can get off of the ballot.
	Okay.
	So it was an RFKJ one, uh, when, and also in Michigan, he won.
	So that was a story late on Friday, but the mainstream media associated propaganda, AP, drudge, they didn't want to report that.
	Yesterday.
	The Supreme Court in Michigan had a ruling and they said you got to stay on the ballot.
	And as I said, I think a lot of this stuff, they're overestimating how the influence of RFK Jr.
	I don't think it's going to have that much influence.
	As I said, as people get close to the election, they revert back to their political tribalism.
	It always happens every time around.
	It doesn't matter how much they dislike the Republicans or the Democrat, they will always go back if they Identified with Republicans or Democrats always go back more than half of the support that you see on independence and third party candidates will evaporate At the very end and they start to once they make that decision They're going to support the person that party that they've always been affiliated with then they start to become rabidly
	Pro-Trump or pro-LaLa.
	I've seen it, seen it personally with friends and things like that.
	People going from, you know, Trump's a murderer.
	Trump needs to be in jail.
	I'll never vote for that guy.
	Trump 2024!
	On Facebook, right?
	You see this kind of stuff all the time.
	It's like, wow, I need to get some spine and a backbone to go along with some critical thinking here.
	But when we look at the vice presidential debate, that's going to start October 1st.
	And there'll be already, you know, half dozen states that where the vote will voting will already have started.
	Pennsylvania, as a matter of fact, starts, uh, September the 16th.
	So, um, it's next Monday, not even a week from now, they will start voting in Pennsylvania.
	So, uh, we're getting quite close thankfully.
	And, um, we don't have to put up with this maybe too much longer.
	Of course it'll never stop.
	The politics will never stop.
	Lala Harris is now secluded in a hotel with a Trump impersonator.
	Strange bedfellows, isn't it?
	Harris's campaign, and she's made her career at Strange Bedfellows, Harris's campaign has got her in a hotel and put her on a fake stage with a Trump impersonator.
	Now that's something that I would pay to see.
	I would like to see her debating somebody from Saturday Night Live, for example.
	At least have some humor in it.
	They've got the lights, they've got it set up like it's a studio, they got the stage, they even brought in somebody who's dressed and acting like the former president.
	Except they said he had an orange wig, and it's like, no, his wig is not orange, his skin is orange.
	So, and they're drilling Harris.
	So that she can function without cheating notes.
	And she's not going to have her security animal with her, Tim Walz.
	She's got to do this solo.
	I mean, this is, you know, this is really going to be difficult for her.
	Something she hasn't done since becoming the nominee.
	She hasn't done a single interview, not a press conference.
	Well, she did have one interview, but she took along her comfort animal with her, Tim Walz.
	And, uh, without being able to go Trump into soundbite traps because the muted microphones rule that Harris campaign failed to get changed.
	The polls are once again, showing Trump leading Harris in the crucial States.
	That's right.
	Where is the thing?
	What?
	Uh, yeah, that's it.
	Let's talk about the horse race.
	Nate silver.
	He's switching.
	Awesome.
	Yeah, so Nate Silver at 538 has now changed horses again in midstream.
	You know, just a couple of weeks ago they were saying, and this is absolutely Lala Harris all the way, and now he's switched.
	And it's kind of interesting when you look at, this is the data here, I can see why he switched.
	This is Well, they're talking about in terms of his probability and what Nate Silver does is he doesn't look at the opinion polls and that kind of gives you an insight into maybe the popular vote.
	That's not the way we elect presidents.
	It's a state by state.
	And so he looks at it state by state.
	And so there's a lot of states that are just, you know, in the tank for one candidate or the other.
	And then there's the so-called battleground states that.
	Possibly could move from one to the other.
	And so when you look at this, the blue line of course is Harris and the red line is Trump.
	They have switched the colors so that we embrace communism.
	Wouldn't want to have the Marxist commie Democrats as red.
	That would be a little bit too, wait a minute.
	I think I know what's going on here.
	And so we become the red team.
	And so when you look at this, you know, there's, um, A bell-shaped curve for Harris.
	And Trump has flattened her curve at this point in time.
	And then he is an inverted bell-shaped curve.
	So he was quite a bit above her.
	Then she got above him, and now she's quite a bit below him.
	And so when you look at it, he breaks it down.
	He says, here's the electoral college probability, 64% to 35%.
	And he actually goes higher in some of the simulations that he does.
	The popular vote shows it going to Lala Harris 55, actually 56 to 44.
	But it shows the Electoral College at 64 to 35 percent probability.
	And saying that Trump could get 281 electoral college votes to her 256.
	Was it something like 270 you need?
	Something like that.
	Anyway.
	And the popular vote share shows her as 49.7 and him at 49.1.
	So again, you know, you have to take into consideration state by state thing.
	And so he does that.
	He looks at the state by state, the swing States, the magnificent seven, I guess we could call them.
	Pennsylvania, Trump ahead 64-36. Michigan, Trump ahead 54-46.
	Wisconsin, Trump ahead 53-47. Arizona, Trump 77-23. North Carolina, Trump 75-25.
	Do we have a winner yet?
	Of course, we're weeks away and anything can happen, like tonight.
	Who knows what'll happen?
	And they're not done.
	They've got some tricks up their sleeve.
	So, as I said before, as people pointed out before, at this point against Trump, Clinton was doing much better than Lala Harris, and Biden was doing much, much better than Lala Harris is doing.
	So the trend is even to go down for her.
	And then we come into the issues.
	What issues is she going to talk about?
	Will Trump really talk about the issues, or will he talk about the fact that she used to be Indian, but now she's black?
	Yeah.
	Um, Harris's campaign dodges Axios.
	Axios is a very friendly mainstream left stream publication, but she doesn't want to do any interviews with anybody.
	Part of it is because she's flip-flopping back and forth on really key issues.
	They wanted to ask her questions about the EV mandate.
	She says, I don't support mandating EVs anymore.
	And so then they followed up and they said, well, you know, can we even get a comment from the people who are really running the campaign?
	I know she doesn't know anything.
	I know she's not going to do an interview with us, but can we get a statement from the campaign itself?
	No, no, they never responded.
	And so when we look at, um, the cars, The cars are part of the other big problem that they've got, which is the economy and inflation.
	This was sent to me by a listener.
	He said, here's an example of Bidenomics $11,664 increase in five years.
	He said that he got a 2019 Honda Odyssey and he shows the price there and said, I just priced it out for a 2024 Honda Odyssey.
	And $11,000 more, it went from 35, uh, 30, 30, yeah, 35, 36, uh, to 47 and change change being $694 and 43 cents.
	Uh, that's the big issue, right?
	And that's the big issue with the EVs as well.
	And he's not even looking at an EV.
	I mean, if he had priced in an EV, here's a, here's a Honda and here's a Honda EV, you know?
	That's much, much worse than that.
	Harris's campaign won't say whether she supports requiring automakers to build only electric or hydrogen vehicles by 2035, a position she took during her campaign when she was running for president four years ago.
	Um, but of course she does.
	It's all about the green deal.
	The green steel on August the 28th Axios asked the Harris campaign, not her, but just the campaign people who are actually running stuff.
	To clarify her position, whether she would sign or veto a bill she co-sponsored in 2019.
	On Tuesday afternoon, Harris' campaign ultimately declined to comment.
	No interviews, no press conference, no comments, no policy statements.
	They are running frayed.
	Because they are such radical leftists.
	Will Trump expose that, or will he start getting petty and personal?
	Four issues Lala has made and changed her position on.
	The New York Times pointed out that in their poll over the weekend showing that Trump was ahead, 47% of respondents viewed Harris as, quote, too liberal or progressive.
	47% said she's too liberal or progressive.
	Only 32% viewed Trump as too conservative.
	How could anybody view him as conservative?
	What is he trying to conserve?
	I don't know.
	Anyway, you know, when you look at what Dana Bash did with her, the only interview that she sat down to do, pre-recorded, not live.
	She's got her comfort animal with her, Tim Waltz there.
	And since that's not enough, CNN's Dana Bash says, well, you know, you've been all over the map with these things.
	You've reversed yourself on a lot of key issues.
	What are some of the reasons, you know, why, why did you do this?
	Was it because of this?
	Was it because of that?
	Was it because of this other thing?
	Actually gave her a multiple choice.
	Here, here's some excuses that you can give me.
	I'll take any of these excuses.
	Lala wasn't smart enough to do that.
	How should voters look at some of the changes that you've made, that you've explained some of here, in your policy?
	Is it because you have more experience now and you've learned more about the information?
	Is it because you were running for president in a Democratic primary?
	And should they feel comfortable and confident that what you're saying now is going to be your policy moving forward?
	Dana, I think the most important and most significant aspect of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have not changed.
	You mentioned the Green New Deal.
	I have always believed, and I have worked on it, that the climate crisis is real, that it is an urgent matter, to which we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves to deadlines around time.
	We did that with the Employment Reduction Act.
	We have set goals for the United States of America, and by extension, the globe, around when we should meet certain standards for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, as an example.
	Isn't that great?
	See, she's in sync around the globe.
	As a matter of fact, you know, part of the problem in Italy and Germany and other places are complaining.
	I said, you know, we got this 2035 deadline.
	Where'd that come from?
	Uh, it's a global conspiracy that she's a part of.
	She's parroting that global conspiracy, just like Trump did with the warp speed and lockdown, all the rest of this stuff.
	These people walk, both of them walk in lockstep.
	With the globalists.
	Both of them are on board with the global agenda.
	It's just one of them you can see it, one of them you can't.
	As a matter of fact, as she's doing it, she says, well, you know, I've always been about the Green New Deal.
	And so we did the Inflation Reduction Act, just like I said earlier.
	Biden said, well, we did the Inflation Reduction Act.
	We should have called it what it was.
	And he was talking about the Green New Deal.
	So both of them talk about the Green New Deal, the Green New Steel, And both of them equate it to the so-called Inflation Reduction Act, which is exactly right.
	But in all of this, what she's saying essentially is, well, I'm on board with the global agenda.
	I'm on board with the green steel.
	And I'll say and do anything I need to.
	My values haven't changed.
	I'm just telling people different stories right now because she is a fracking liar.
	Fracking is one of the issues that she's changed on.
	That's what he should call her.
	You are a fracking liar.
	We must guard against what is a clear crisis in terms of the climate, she said.
	And to do that, what we've accomplished thus far, the Inflation Reduction Act, it's going to be, she says, what we've done To invest, by my calculation, probably a trillion dollars over the next few years.
	That's why I call it the green steel.
	It's a grift.
	It's a transfer of wealth.
	We've already done trillions of dollars to them.
	We're going to do even more trillions of dollars.
	The guy that they now love to hate, Elon Musk, is going to be one of the biggest benefactors of all this stuff, because he's selling these battery energy storage sites.
	He got on the ground floor with that, pushing that out.
	But, you know, it's a big transfer to their friends.
	Trillions of dollars.
	And even to the people that they claim to hate.
	And then we have the border crossings.
	You know, it was interesting in the 2020 presidential run, I remember calling it, when they had the big crew of Democrat candidates.
	And they asked them at one point in time, do you think we ought to decriminalize the border crossings?
	And they all raised their hand yes.
	I said, well, they just admitted that it's a crime to cross the border illegally.
	They don't want us to call the people who are committing crimes crossing the border illegally.
	They don't want us to call them illegal.
	But they just called him illegal.
	So during a primary debate, she also raised her hand to say that health care plans should include coverage for undocumented migrants.
	See, when she says health care for all and welfare for all, what she and the Democrats mean is for all of the world.
	Because we are the only country that can just conjure money out of nowhere and never have to pay it back.
	But the world is waking up to that scam.
	And it's going to come crashing down.
	She says, well, we have laws, and they have to be followed, and they have to be enforced, and they address and deal with people who cross our borders illegally.
	And there should be consequences, she said.
	So were there consequences for the Haitians, for example?
	That is why, also, starting with our administration, we gave TPS, Temporary Protected Status, to Haitian migrants, 55,000.
	And then more recently, we extended Temporary Protected Status to over 100,000 Haitian migrants for that very reason, that they need support, they need protection.
	I always wondered what TPS stood for.
	Yeah, you apparently didn't put one of the new cover sheets on your TPS reports.
	Oh, yeah.
	I'm sorry about that.
	I forgot.
	Yeah.
	You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out.
	Did you see the memo about this?
	Yeah.
	That's from Lala?
	I have the memo right here.
	I just forgot.
	But it's not shipping out till tomorrow, so there's no problem.
	If you could just go ahead and make sure you do that from now on, that would be great.
	And, uh, I'll go ahead and make sure you get another copy of that memo.
	Okay?
	Yeah, no, I have the memo.
	I've got it.
	It's right there, Phil.
	If you don't fill out that TPS report, how are we going to get these Haitians in?
	I mean, we got 20,000 of them in Smithfield, Ohio, but they're living with the Simpsons cheek to jowl, I guess, in Smithfield.
	But how are we going to get more of them in if you don't fill out your TPS report?
	I always wondered what that was.
	Anyway, the electric vehicle mandate.
	When Harris was a senator, she co-sponsored a bill that would require automakers to build strictly electric or hydrogen vehicles by 2035.
	That's exactly the magic number that all of the globalist leaders are doing.
	Wow, it's like they got together at some meeting or something and set up a plan that they didn't tell us about.
	Wow, it's going to require, oh, you mean mandate.
	Mandate.
	You mean central planning of the economy.
	You mean car prohibition.
	Yeah.
	You see, it isn't that she just doesn't like ICE, I-C-E at the border.
	She doesn't like ice in your car, either.
	The internal combustion engine.
	No ice!
	I should have gone to the DNC and sold no ice shirts.
	Now, most of them would have thought that it was the border, but there would have been a few that were a little bit more savvy.
	Yeah, no internal combustion engine.
	I want that as well.
	And no fuel.
	No fuel for the ice cars.
	Because of global warming, you don't want to give any money to ice.
	An archived version of her campaign, she pledged 100% carbon neutral electricity on all new buses, heavy duty vehicles, vehicle fleets.
	The page also indicated support for requiring 100% of new vehicles to be zero emission by 2035.
	When they talk about zero this and zero that, zero population growth, zero emissions, zero carbon, this is the totalitarian intolerance of the central planners.
	you.
	You should give zero attention, zero support, to anybody who says zero anything.
	That's what these people are all about.
	They're about zero population.
	That's the fundamental issue.
	And of course, there'll be zero fuel for the existing cars as well.
	And then this other article also recounts that, you know, Axios tried in early September, a week ago, they tried to get her to clarify this, but they won't even talk about it.
	And then that brings us to another one of our flip-flops.
	Medicare for all.
	Medicare for all people of Earth.
	People of Earth, I come to serve mankind.
	The old Twilight Zone thing, right?
	They found out it was a cookbook.
	Yeah, well, they got a cookbook approach.
	It's called Cloward and Piven.
	It's a cookbook approach to destroy us, to destroy our economy.
	Everybody gets Medicare.
	All people get Medicare.
	It's all going to be paid for by Uncle Sugar.
	And Uncle Sugar is just going to conjure up the credits on his computers, and everything will just be fine.
	This is also something that has been around for a very long time.
	Thirty-one years ago.
	So here we are in 1993.
	Fifty years after the chairman introduced, the chairman's father introduced the first legislation.
	We are still wrestling with many of the same issues and the same problems that previous generations have worked on.
	The difference is that today, our system has many problems that have gotten increasingly expensive, and the difficulties of delivering health care in a cost-effective way is making a challenge to the fiscal integrity of the federal and state governments, to businesses, to individuals across the country.
	Now is our chance to beat the historical odds and give the American people the health security they need She tried to run this, not even so much as compassion, but as fiscal imperative.
	I'm going to be fiscally responsible.
	Well, it's Medicare for all people of Earth will be the thing that will fiscally take us down the fiscal drain.
	And this whole single payer thing, that means there's nobody pays.
	Single payer means that the government will run all your health care.
	Had that work out for you under Trump in 2020.
	And of course, notice what happened.
	Trump was the one who was there, not just locking us down and putting out ventilators to kill people and vaccines to kill people, but he was also laying down the foundation, you know, laying down the initial universal basic income stuff to get people accustomed to that.
	And then setting up all of the incentives for the hospitals to kill people based on bribing them.
	They just point at somebody and I'll give you $13,000.
	I'll give you a 20% bonus on everything that you do.
	Yeah.
	What kind of a single payer is that?
	Pay everybody everywhere for everything.
	No problem at all.
	So, um, again, Nate Silver, who has just reversed this.
	He runs the 538 thing and it's tied, I think, to the New York Times.
	Maybe it's independent.
	He's got his Silver Bulletin newsletter that he puts out there.
	Nate Silver does.
	And like I said before, he goes anywhere from his simulations, the one I showed you earlier, the snapshot that was there in terms of the poles.
	That's a 6535.
	But he runs it through various scenarios in a simulation, again, doing a state-by-state thing.
	And this is the most positive one for Lala Harris.
	It goes as much as 78-22 in favor of Trump in his terms of his simulations.
	So he said she missed the big opportunity.
	One campaign decision, he said, cost her all of this stuff.
	What would that be?
	He says one big mistake could cost her the election.
	Well, it's putting Tim Walz in, because it showed that she was part of the radical, radical, radical left.
	FiveThirtyEight founder said that she blew, quote, blew one big opportunity to track to the center with her selection of Tim Walz.
	rather than Josh Shapiro out of Pennsylvania, showed nearly half of 47, nearly half of the people in the New York Times poll that I mentioned before, nearly half, 47%, think that she's too liberal.
	A reflection of her abortive 2020 presidential campaign.
	Interesting choice of words from the New York Post.
	Her abortive campaign.
	She aborted her campaign once before.
	I guess that was her choice to make.
	A woman's choice to abort her campaign.
	You know, back in the early days of Rush Limbaugh, he used to do collar abortions.
	I don't like what you're saying, you know, make this noise and hang up on people.
	People thought that was too edgy.
	And Rush pulled it back.
	He became a lapdog of the Republican Party after he went to, you know, he was pretty critical of George H.W.
	Bush.
	And when he reversed himself and read my lips, no new taxes, and he did the biggest tax increase we'd ever had at that point in time, he had an audio commercial where George H.W.
	Bush is heard running up to the top of the White House and looking at the weather vane to see which way the wind is blowing and then raising taxes.
	So it was very damaging, and George H.W.
	Bush invited him to the White House.
	Met him and carried his bags so he could sleep in the Lincoln bedroom.
	And you know, they just did like some kind of a brain transfer or something with him at that point in time.
	He was owned by them.
	And I've seen it happen to the guy that I used to work for as well.
	So, um, it's, um, would it be too harsh for us to talk about campaign abortions?
	Should we do a campaign abortion?
	These two people.
	Should we say that her campaign should just be torn apart limb by limb?
	No, you can't say that.
	I mean, that's the reality for what they do to babies.
	But you can't talk about that in a metaphorical sense, even.
	No, it's just too harsh.
	Too harsh.
	Well, Trump said saving babies at six weeks is too harsh.
	Her campaign that year was run by, in 2019, by people who seemingly thought that Elizabeth Warren was a right-winger, wrote Nate Silver.
	I think Waltz was a decent enough pick on his own merits because Nate is a lefty Democrat.
	So yeah, I don't know, he doesn't have any problem with her, but it's just, hey, you just flew your flag.
	Everybody sees where you're coming from now.
	They see that you're waltzing with the radical left.
	So, but he does make a good support dog.
	You saw that when he's doing interviews.
	He's sitting there and he's nodding his head.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	I agree with her.
	Whatever she says.
	Whenever she is forced to do an interview and her one and only interview, he's there as a very good little support animal.
	So I guess, you know, she got what she wanted from him.
	So what is her next move?
	You know, the polls have gone, she's gone down like this, and Trump has gone down and then back up again.
	So now what do they do?
	Well, I think the obvious next move is for her to become president before the election, right?
	That's going to be about the only thing she can do in this game to keep the momentum.
	And look, understand, they picked these people knowing that whoever of these two wins, they'll be their lapdogs.
	And they just have them, they have them compete against each other.
	It's the same thing that DARPA and the intelligence community did with the internet companies and social media companies that they funded in the late nineties when the switching circuitry started, you know, giving people the bandwidth that they needed.
	They poured a lot of money into several different companies and then they let them compete.
	And that's what they're doing with the politicians because either one of these People will do whatever the globalists want, whatever the so-called deep state, the intelligence community, the military-industrial complex, big business, big pharma.
	They're lapdogs for all of those interests.
	But what does she do in terms of competition?
	Well, the thing that she can do to take the narrative back is become president.
	I think that will be the October surprise.
	They'll wait closer to the end of the election, because as you saw with this, You know, you do something, you do the, well, okay, now we're going to anoint her as the presidential candidate and everybody gets to celebrate that and everything.
	So she gets a big bump.
	She'll get a big bump when they make her president and she'll, they'll do that just before the election.
	Kash Patel, who, uh, former department of defense, chief of staff and deputy director of national intelligence under Trump.
	Kash Patel thinks that as well.
	He shared his belief that Biden might step down and hand the reins of the presidency to his vice president in a carefully orchestrated political move designed to shield his embattled family.
	And this was very clear as well.
	Last week, very strange turn of events, I guess.
	And if you didn't pay any attention, it's like, well, look at this.
	We had Hunter Biden went to skip the trial and he just admits guilt.
	Just going to throw himself on the mercy of the court.
	Or maybe he knows that there's already a deal in place where Biden can step down and he can get a pardon from Lala Harris, he and all of his family.
	Just look at the people that Trump pardoned.
	Did he pardon Julian Assange?
	No.
	Snowden?
	No.
	Ross Ulbrich?
	No.
	And he's saying he's going to pardon Ross Ulbrich?
	No.
	Well, why didn't you do it then?
	You had so many people writing you, asking you to do it.
	Ross's mom, very involved in all of that.
	Didn't do any of that stuff.
	Marty Gottesfeld?
	No.
	No.
	All these people who were political prisoners, who were unjustly convicted, given extreme things.
	And of course, the biggest of all, refused to pardon the January the Sixers.
	Who he had misled, used, fleeced.
	And he and Alex, you know, I mean, it's just amazing to me.
	So anyway, I think no member of the Biden family will ever go to prison, said Cash Patel.
	The tax trial that Hunter Biden is now undergoing is total sham and a fraud.
	And of course he admitted that he's guilty.
	Just let's not air that dirty laundry.
	Let's just go ahead and do that and we'll take care of it with a pardon.
	He should have been charged with multiple serious felonies years ago, but not going to mention the fact he's already a convicted felon, but daddy's going to save him.
	He's never going to go to jail.
	There'll be a horse trade.
	Biden will leave or retire.
	Uh, and then you Lala are going to take the reins.
	And once the election is over, you're going to pardon my son, my entire family and myself, because remember here's the king.
	Okay.
	This is Kash Patel.
	And he was Trump's Department of Defense Chief of Staff.
	And he was Deputy Director of the National Intelligence under Trump.
	He's part of the inner circle.
	He knows it.
	They all know it.
	Just like Trump knew that he lost.
	He just finally admitted that he lost by a whisker.
	But, you know, I talked to Ken Block, who was hired to do the election stuff.
	He says, yeah, they all knew that they lost.
	They just kept it going.
	Lured the January the 6th people in, and then left them twisting in the wind.
	I've said that all along, and I've given historical precedence about that.
	Gerald Ford pardoning Nixon before he was charged with anything.
	Said, well, I pardoned him for doing this, this, and this, and so if you charge him, you can't do any, you know, you can't charge him.
	He's already been pardoned.
	And prior to that, the original Insurrection Act.
	Andrew Johnson, who took over from Abraham Lincoln when Lincoln was shot.
	And they put the Insurrection Act together to come after Confederates.
	And he pardoned them all.
	And so you don't have to wait until somebody is charged.
	And that's what Kash Patel says.
	People inside the Trump administration knew this as well.
	They weren't ignorant of history or the law.
	He says, because remember, presidential pardons aren't just retroactive.
	Their perspective.
	So if you pardon someone, you pardon them for the entirety of the conduct that you include in the pardon paperwork.
	From here to infinity and beyond.
	So Trump's guy knew this.
	Everybody knew it.
	They knew this about the January the 6th people.
	So why didn't Trump pardon them?
	Because he's not standing between you and the evil Democrats.
	You're standing between him and the evil Democrats.
	He will throw his supporters under the bus.
	This whole thing was orchestrated from the beginning with people like Roger Stone and Alex Jones.
	And I called it from the very beginning.
	And I'm proud to say that I stood up to him at his network and that's why he fired me.
	He didn't fire me because he's out of money.
	No, no, no.
	He hasn't sent me this stuff.
	He wasn't paying me that much to bankrupt him.
	But yeah, he fired me because I opposed him on this stuff.
	I'd do it again.
	And I continue to do it.
	And whenever I do it, I'm called a disgruntled former employee.
	I was disgruntled when I was there as an employee.
	I opposed him when I was there.
	He threw these people to the Democrat wolves, he and Trump.
	Trump could have, and of course nothing ever happened.
	To the two of them, really.
	So, RFK Jr.
	So, the Republicans have become the party of the common man.
	Well, have they?
	Have they really?
	Or, have the Republicans become the Democrats, so much so that RFK Jr.
	is comfortable with them?
	The Democrats have become the Marxists.
	That's my perspective.
	It's always been my perspective on it.
	And as I said before, he is now going to remain on the ballot in Michigan, but I don't think that's going to make any difference, frankly.
	Like I said before, people are going to fall back into this tribalism.
	We have a reporter calling Lala Harris out for her fake supporters at a rally.
	CBS reporter.
	rally. CBS reporter. Look at that. All of these buses, you know they could at least have hired them from different companies so it's so obvious that they're all part of this thing.
	She had a dozen buses there in New Hampshire.
	She did this, I think this was in Savannah.
	She had to bus people from up to four hours away to get them to a rally in Savannah, Georgia.
	One man said he was bussed in from Atlanta, about a three and a half to four hour drive away from Savannah, Georgia.
	Everything about the Harris campaign is staged, managed, and fake.
	But she does love buses, doesn't she?
	Especially those yellow buses.
	And I imagine that fixation could be her downfall.
	Just how fake this whole thing is.
	If people pay any attention to it, they realize the whole thing is fake.
	Well, we're going to take a break.
	I've been going on for about an hour.
	So I'm going to take a break here and we'll do a short commercial.
	We'll actually talk about the common man.
	I'll give you my idea about what I think the common man is about.
	It's about, and you know, if you are familiar with the music, this is kind of a throwback to Fanfare for the Common Man by Aaron Copland, done about the middle of the 20th century.
	And, of course, Emerson, Lake, and Palmer did a version of it.
	I started out, and I was going to do a cover of Emerson, Lake, and Palmer's adaptation of Common Man.
	I wound up doing something else, and I thought, well, let me make that into a commercial.
	So, yeah, this is my opinion.
	of what's going on with the common man.
	It's not, publicans and democrats are nothing, have nothing to do with the interests of the common man.
	They are weaponized against the common man.
	I'm sorry.
	you They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidNightShow.com And we really do thank you for your support Thank you, Eric, for the tip on Rockfan.
	I really do appreciate that.
	That's what it is, your voluntary contributions that fund this program.
	We have some people who support it, some things that we recommend, but it is really your voluntary contributions that are the bulk of our support here.
	And so please like the stream.
	Please help people to find this.
	It is difficult, forbidden information for you to have.
	Not part of the club.
	Not part of the tribes.
	I don't belong to either one of the tribes.
	As Gerald Salenti used to say, he's a political atheist.
	Well, I guess I am a political atheist.
	When it comes to politics, I don't worship either of these parties.
	And I try to call them out for the idolatry that is there and to tell you that your life is really determined by your relationship with God.
	And then after that, your relationship with your family, with your neighbor.
	Love God with all your heart, and your neighbor as yourself.
	Start to fix your society from the ground up.
	It's the only thing that's going to work.
	And all this stuff from a top-down solution, it's just the biggest distraction, the biggest misdirection, the biggest red herring of all, are these presidential elections.
	So you can find us on Roku, on Rockfin as well.
	We're also on Roku.
	If you want to watch the program on TV, you can also search for it on Roku.
	You can find it on Roku with a search engine still.
	So if you find it there, please rate that five stars.
	Give us a little bit more visibility there.
	Please, wherever you're watching the show, whether it's live or recorded, whether it's video or audio, please like the show.
	That really does help us.
	And it's something that only takes a second to do.
	Very important.
	So, you'll find all the links to the show at TheDavidNyeShow.com as well as places where you can go to support us if you'd like to.
	We have Cash App.
	We have Subscribestar, very important, Subscribestar.
	And a lot of different tiers that people can get into there at Subscribestar.
	That gives us a regular base of support.
	Zelle, if your bank supports it, that is something that happens right away and there's absolutely, for now, there's no fee at all on Zelle.
	We have a P.O.
	Box if you would like to send a contribution that way.
	There's no fee on that either.
	But we do have several different places where you can support us.
	Cash App is another one of those.
	And we've gotten the problems ironed out now with Cash App.
	So it seems to be working fine now.
	I don't know what happened.
	Maybe they updated it or something, but it was really kind of weird and funky for a couple of weeks.
	It's doing strange stuff.
	And it still occasionally is kind of strange for me to try to like when somebody sends a cash.
	I think about the only thing I can do is to hit a heart thing to acknowledge it.
	I try to do that, but it still gives me some issues with that sometimes.
	But it is working as far as the money goes.
	And so we really do appreciate your support.
	Let's talk a little bit about electric vehicles because Lala is talking about that.
	We now have an environmental, the chairman of the Environment Agency.
	That is something in the UK.
	Is it government?
	Is it NGO?
	Does it really matter?
	Because they're all merged together on these things.
	His idea that electric vehicles are going to be bad for rivers is not based on the fact that they're going to crash through bridges like that Ford Lightning that weighed 9,000 pounds, empty, just went through a historical bridge that's been around for over a century.
	It went through the bridge, vertically, not horizontally, and wound up in the river, fortunately.
	There was nobody canoeing or rafting underneath it at the time, because it is a very popular area for that, and fortunately the driver was able to get out.
	I don't know how he was able to get out, since, you know, that's one of the key things.
	It used to be an obsession with people in Europe that they would get trapped into their cars.
	And that's especially an issue with the electric cars, I would think, because all the windows now are power windows.
	And you get in the water, and you lose your power like that.
	You can't get out of the car.
	It's hard to get out.
	So a lot of times, people in Europe will have a device that they can smack the window with.
	It's a pointed device to shatter it.
	So they can kick their way out, not be trapped in the car and drown.
	So that guy, somehow he got out.
	Uh, I don't know, but glad that he got out.
	But what they're saying is not that we're going to have massively heavy trucks and things like that crashing through bridges into the water.
	It's not going to pollute it that way.
	They're saying that the electric vehicles use because they're so heavy.
	They use up their tires much faster.
	They use up their brakes much faster.
	And so we're going to have all this tire dust and brake dust that's out there.
	I guess they're not too worried about all the electric car smoke when they catch fire, but yeah, we're going to have all this dust and it's going to wash off the roads and to the rivers.
	And there's going to be even more pollution because they use these expendables up at a much faster rate.
	But look, if you start talking about this kind of stuff, just understand that they don't want everybody to have an electric car or electric truck.
	They don't want anybody to have a car or truck of any kind.
	All of this has been designed from the very beginning to have zero private transportation.
	That's what they want to zero out.
	They don't want anybody to have a car or truck of any kind.
	They want to completely control transportation.
	And this has been very obvious to anybody who follows this going back for decades.
	I remember in Raleigh, going to a student council, that's what it's like, a town council meeting, city council meeting.
	And they had some Marxist Democrat who had just come back from Russia.
	This was before Russia fell in 1989.
	So she's bragging about how she just came back from the Soviet Union.
	She was able to go anywhere she wanted to in Moscow and it only cost her a nickel.
	To ride in the subway.
	And I said, well, it costs you everything.
	That costs the Russian people everything.
	Not just a nickel.
	It costs them their freedom to move and go where they want to go.
	That's the true cost of that kind of public transportation.
	Well, what she was trying to do was to build up a consensus for one of these monorail boondoggles and little Raleigh.
	Just ridiculous what these people are about.
	But it was always about making, you know, I'm going to offer you free stuff.
	In a way that makes you dependent on the government.
	And the Democrats and Republicans, many of them, at every level, everything they do, whether it's a local government or whether it's a federal government, everything is designed to make you dependent on the government.
	And they do it with free stuff.
	That's why the stimulus checks were so reprehensible.
	Because that was a precursor.
	It was conditioning.
	For universal basic income.
	Oh yeah, don't you want some free cash?
	Here's some free cash from the government.
	Well, from the government, I'm here to help you.
	Italy has called on the EU to pause the gas, gasoline car ban, the internal combustion engine ban, or to risk the collapse of the automobile industry in Italy.
	Well, they know that.
	Collapse is their desired outcome.
	They want to take us back into a feudal society for those of us that survive.
	For the most part, they want to go to zero population.
	European Union's 2035 petrol car ban... Wait a minute!
	What an amazing coincidence!
	That just happens to be the date that Lala has chosen!
	That's a presidential candidate!
	Back in 2019!
	Let's get rid of all the internal combustion engines by 2035.
	The European Union wants to do that as well.
	The UN wants to do it as well.
	The Bilderberg Group wants to do it.
	The Davos World Economic Forum.
	All the same agenda.
	How could that be?
	It's not a conspiracy.
	We can rule that out right from the beginning.
	Nobody is engaged.
	None of our leaders are engaged in a conspiracy.
	Only you, the little people.
	Do conspiracies.
	You're a conspiracy theorist, and if you commit a crime, we're going to charge you with the crime and with a conspiracy to commit that crime.
	You're the conspiracy theorist, not our leaders.
	Our leaders would never conspire with each other to come up with exactly the same date and to do exactly the same thing at the same time as Trump and Biden did throughout this whole charade of the pandemic.
	No, they would never do that.
	So there's been a growing unease across the continent about a slowdown in demand for electric vehicles.
	There's also, how are they going to get us to buy these things?
	At really inflated prices, by the way.
	There are also concerns that the Europe's car industry is falling increasingly behind manufacturers in China and even the US.
	Why?
	It's the energy, stupid.
	It's the price of energy, stupid.
	They can't compete with China because China has been given an advantage with the Paris Climate Accord that they will always have far, far cheaper energy.
	They can't manufacture cars.
	They can't manufacture steel.
	They're closing all those factories down.
	Last week, car giant Volkswagen warned that it might close factories in Germany for the first time ever, owing to issues such as high energy prices.
	Well, that's no longer a theory.
	It is now a definite announcement.
	Yesterday, one person says Europe needs a pragmatic vision.
	It says its ideological vision has failed.
	You know, that vision thing that George H.W.
	Bush always talked about.
	No, they don't need a pragmatic vision.
	They don't need an ideological vision.
	They need a theological vision.
	You know, quite frankly, when I talk about the great replacement that's happening, the deliberate chaos and takedown of our societies that's happening everywhere, whether you're talking about France or Germany or Italy or the UK or the United States, these are really the leaders that God has put in place.
	At one point, you have, just reading the other day, When Solomon reached out to Hiram to get supplies and workers and designers and artists and everything to build the temple and his palace and everything, he responded and said, God must really love your people to give them a leader like you.
	Can you say that about Trump or Lala or fill in the blank, any of them?
	Can you say that about any of the foreign leaders out there?
	Can you say that about Macron or Trudeau?
	God must really love Canada to give them a leader like Trudeau.
	That's just dripping with sarcasm, isn't it?
	No.
	People like Trudeau, Trump, Lala Harris, Macron, all of these.
	Maloney, Baloney, Keir Starmer, all of them.
	Dictator Dan, Gladys Berejiklian, God doesn't love the West.
	These people are a judgment of us.
	We're not looking at the Great Replacement.
	We're looking at a great judgment of Western civilization that's going on here.
	God does judge nations and countries, as well as the individuals in them.
	That's why we are to pray for the peace of the country that we live in and work for that to happen.
	Especially to pray for it, because we're going to go through this bad time as well.
	We have our relationship with God, but it could be difficult for us.
	Perhaps we could be better in terms of salt and light, to make sure that doesn't happen.
	Maybe we could start having some of the people who are professing Christians actually pick up the Bible and read it, instead of having H.P.
	Lufgraf, sci-fi horror conventions and ancient church buildings as they are doing up in the Northeast.
	Anyway, back to Volkswagen.
	The people's car.
	Volkswagen announced plans to shut down factories.
	It is a bellwether for the economy, says Deutschwelt.
	And a letter to employees on Monday?
	VW's brand chief described the situation as quote intense, extremely tense and beyond the scope of simple cost cutting measures.
	So Germany has fallen behind in terms of competitiveness.
	The 10 car brands that are part of the VW group and understand that it is a big conglomeration company, just like General Motors.
	Over the years, they've gone out and bought all these different car brands, even things like, uh, uh, I think it was Bugatti and, uh, you know, a lot of, a lot of extreme, uh, brands like that, you know, not just Audi and the German brands and stuff, but it's really big.
	And so they've got 10 different car brands that they brought in.
	You're probably going to see a lot of those disappear.
	They must be comprehensively restructured.
	Plant closures are no longer excluded, he said.
	VW feels compelled to terminate the Employment Protection Agreement that's been in place since 1994.
	30 years.
	There's the news there, winepressnews.com.
	To make matters worse, for the 680,000 VW employees worldwide, management also feels forced to end its job security program, which has been in place since 1994, and prevents job cuts until 2029.
	So it's going to be a big fight between the unions and the management, probably.
	Because they had a deal.
	They weren't gonna fire anybody till 2029.
	Five years early, they gotta do it.
	If such an industrial heavyweight has to close factories, it may be long overdue wake-up call that Germany's economic policy measures need to be stepped up considerably, said one person, another at a metal company.
	In Germany, IG Metal said the decision, quote, shakes the foundation of Volkswagen, which is Germany's largest industrial employer and Europe's top car maker.
	Isn't it interesting that they said 2029 back in 1994?
	Could just be a coincidence.
	Or it could be that, you know, the big corporations are in on this war against all of us.
	Well, we'll have to negotiate it in 2030.
	Because by that time, we'll have robots and we'll have all the rest of this stuff that's going to be there.
	So, how is this going to be stopped?
	Well, you never know.
	You never know.
	God could stop any of this stuff at any point that he wants to.
	It really kind of depends on each and every one of us and our relationship to God.
	And if there's enough of us here, there'll be something that changes, I think.
	But you know that it's not going to be coming from the Uni Party.
	The Uni Party is part of the United Nations, because they do everything that all these people want to do.
	We have a single Texas billionaire, though, is about to force Greenpeace into bankruptcy.
	With a lawsuit.
	Like, you come after me, try to put me out of business?
	Well, I'm going to come back at you.
	We have to have that spirit to oppose these injustices and to come back at them with the same thing they're throwing at us.
	And so I applaud him for doing that.
	I hope he wins.
	But it could potentially bankrupt Greenpeace.
	But guess what?
	You're not going to bankrupt the U.S.
	government.
	But they may do it to themselves.
	We're going down that path very, very quickly.
	And by the way, you want to get outside of that system as much as possible.
	Go to davidknight.gold.
	I'll take you to Tony Aardman's Wise Wolf Gold.
	You can start to gradually accumulate gold or silver as part of Wolfpack.
	You get the discounts of being part of a big buying group that Tony's put together.
	He's now got well over 1,000 people.
	And I don't know if he's 1,100, 1,200, something like that.
	It continues to grow.
	And you just determine how much you want to spend each month, and he puts that together.
	He gets a quantity discount.
	Or you can go buy gold and silver directly from him.
	He can help you to set up a gold or silver IRA.
	All of that at Wise Wolf Gold.
	I've known Tony for a very long time.
	He's been a supporter of this program.
	Really do appreciate what he has done for us at davidknight.gold.
	Let him know that you're coming from here.
	And on Rumble, 12 June 1776, thank you for the tip.
	And he says, ground up in Christ.
	Absolutely.
	We're going to fix this, not from Washington down.
	We're going to fix it from the ground up.
	And we're going to fix it because we're grounded in Christ.
	We'll be right back.
	Welcome to the World of Music.
	.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you Well, nothing says, uh, cult of death.
	Like a film festival that worships cannibalism, worships sexual debauchery, worships euthanasia and abortion.
	And I'm talking about the Venice Film Festival.
	Of course, they all do that as well.
	The Cannes Film Festival, same type of stuff.
	These quote-unquote big film festivals always pick the most disgusting stuff.
	They've been on a cannibalism, you know, debauchery type of thing for a couple of years.
	Now, this year, the top prize goes to a pro-euthanasia film called The Room Next Door.
	It's portraying euthanasia in a positive light because these people are a cult of death.
	Hollywood is wholly weird.
	Everything about it is weird, isn't it?
	Interesting you would take that and project that onto other people.
	When you talk about weird, they've got a monopoly on weird, don't they?
	And it is a death cult.
	Every kind of death in every way, and even cannibalism.
	You know, when I think of Venice, the thing that left an indelible mark on me when I went with a group of kids between high school and college, band and chorus group, we went to Venice.
	And the thing that I've always thought about is the Bridge of Sighs.
	So named because it was an open, covered bridge.
	No, you can't drive an EV across it.
	Or even an electric boat, but it definitely would collapse if you could fit it in there.
	But the Bridge of Sighs, there's so many things that come from Venice that are so dark.
	The corrupt family that ruled it, the Star Chamber.
	You know, everybody talks about the Star Chamber.
	You don't want to have a Star Chamber process, that's why we got due process and everything.
	Well, that's where that came from.
	Where you could be accused, tried, and convicted, and they'd come pick you up, or if you were even in the Star Chamber court after they pronounced the sentence on you, they would take people out of there and walk them across the Bridge of Sighs, and people could hear the moaning and the screaming and the crying of the damned as they took them away.
	I tell you, these people in Venice, putting these films out, They're the damned.
	They just haven't faced judgment yet.
	They don't know it.
	So this film got an 18 minute standing ovation.
	One of the longest and recent memories about euthanasia put together by a Spanish director who said, I believe that saving saying goodbye to this world cleanly and with dignity as a fundamental right of every human being.
	No, no, it isn't.
	God gives life and God takes it away.
	It is a gift from God.
	God gives and God takes away.
	So, it has the actresses that are in it, Tilda Swinton, Julianne Moore.
	Swinton plays a war correspondent suffering from terminal cancer.
	She asks her old friend, played by Moore, to be at her side as she takes her own life.
	Yeah, well, I've got cancer.
	Might as well just give up on it.
	Well, no, there's actually things you can do even about cancer.
	And I'm not talking about chemotherapy, necessarily.
	Chemotherapy was a kill to my father.
	It wasn't cancer.
	Chemotherapy.
	Doctors.
	Hospitals.
	John Richardson is going to be joining us at the top of the hour.
	We're going to talk about things that you can do.
	Even with cancer—things that are natural, things that God has provided for us.
	But of course, God is the one who heals.
	We do what we can.
	And by the way, I just want to ask for your prayers.
	We have a lot of things happening in our family right now.
	Travis's son is a couple of months away from being born, and so we'd ask for your prayers for that, your blessings for that.
	We'd ask for your prayers for his struggles with rheumatoid arthritis.
	And then my other son has been severely injured with just the last couple of weeks.
	with a so-called antibiotic.
	They've known about this for 16 years.
	They've put black labels on it three different times, and nobody mentioned any of that.
	It was not given to him, the black label warning.
	Didn't have any warning about it.
	He was concerned more about the infection that they had found.
	And was looking up information about that rather than about the drug.
	I mean, it's just an antibiotic, right?
	Well, an antibiotic gave my mother a stroke that debilitated her through the rest of her life.
	And the people who get these so-called floxins, it is something that What I read, it continues to build and that has been his experience so far.
	So we're asking for your prayers to please and thank you so much for the people who have sent us things about detox, vitamin C, we're using those.
	We treat, God heals.
	And so we ask for your prayers with that.
	Getting back to Venice and the holy weird people that are there.
	The film director said he made the film to communicate his belief that euthanasia should be available around the world.
	He's an activist director.
	His intention is not to entertain people, not to keep them interested.
	It's to push an agenda, of course.
	An agenda of death.
	And the question is, why do you need permission to commit suicide?
	Right?
	Do we need to even have government permission to commit suicide?
	Of course we don't.
	But when you look at their social agenda, you see it all the time with the LGBT stuff.
	It's not enough to tolerate what somebody does.
	You must celebrate it.
	You see?
	It's not enough that they could go out and commit suicide, but we have to have a society and a government that celebrates people committing suicide.
	That's what the Hollywood film is about.
	That's what this director is about.
	That's what the euthanasia agenda is about.
	It's about celebrating the cult of death, not just having a cult of death.
	It's about celebrating it.
	It's important that we have to worship these degeneracies that are out there.
	We've got to celebrate cannibalism and abortion and euthanasia and all the rest of the stuff.
	Can't just do it.
	It's got to be celebrated.
	It's got to be the thing, abortion is the thing, that makes your life, if you're a woman.
	So, the reason is that society has to applaud all this.
	We have to embrace, this is a spiritual war.
	And you have to do worship to these spirits.
	Of cannibalism, euthanasia, abortion, death, degeneracy, debauchery.
	That's what this is about.
	That's what Hollywood is about.
	Some of the other movies that won.
	You have Nicole Kidman won Best Actress Award.
	A movie called Baby Girl.
	In which she plays a high-powered CEO putting her career and her family on the line in order to begin an affair with a much younger intern.
	Yeah, let's honor adultery, even to call it an affair.
	Why do we call it adultery?
	Why do we call it adult entertainment?
	Is it because it's for adults?
	No, it's because you are adulterating your marriage.
	You're bringing, uh, desecrating impure things into it.
	Just like we're talking about adulterated food or adulterated drugs, um, adultery and adult entertainment or adulterated versions of marriage and sex celebrated by Hollywood.
	Of course, that's what they're all about.
	Uh, so career family.
	Now that's not, not even your career is as important as following your heart.
	Well, the heart is desperately wicked.
	Who can know it?
	That's a very different view from the Bible than we get from Hollywood, isn't it?
	And then, The Quiet Son, about a family that best actor was given in the film The Quiet Son.
	A family that was torn apart by what?
	By adultery?
	No.
	You celebrate the adultery.
	That's good.
	Even if it tears the family apart, that's good.
	But if you have somebody in your family that is an extreme right-wing radical that tears the family apart, that's bad.
	That's bad.
	The adultery is good.
	The right-wing politics is bad.
	Best Director Award goes to The Brutalist.
	This is the obligatory annual movie about the Holocaust that is always done by Hollywood.
	They never stop with that.
	And then we have Daniel Queer.
	Daniel Craig as the queer.
	That's the name of the film.
	Daniel Craig playing a gay drug addict.
	Well, that's what I want to see.
	I mean, when you look at the pictures of him as a character.
	Yeah, I can't wait to pay $25 for a ticket to see that.
	Yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Drudge is all about how, oh, yeah, I really loved all the homosexual scenes and everything.
	And he's a gay drug addict.
	It looks like he hasn't washed his hair in a decade or so.
	I mean, it's just, yeah, he really loved that role.
	Really got into character.
	Now, what did not get an award?
	Well, people thought that Angelina Jolie playing Maria Callas in a biopic talking about the life of this famous opera singer.
	Um, they thought that might do pretty well, but even with a big name star, it's just too wholesome.
	You know, we, we, I don't know what's in it.
	They probably adulterated that story as well, but that did not win anything.
	I mean, they're focused on music and opera.
	They can't do that.
	So meanwhile, plastic surgeons are now the only medical group that is kind of pushed back a little bit from harming minors.
	Minors.
	That's what we're talking about, minors.
	Gaslighting minors, mutilating minors, sterilizing minors, failed surgeries that cause many of these minors to commit suicide because of the so-called bottom surgery.
	A medical society says that a dearth of evidence gives them pause about treating children.
	They're not saying, we're not going to do it.
	Just like, well, you know, maybe we ought to think about this.
	The tide might be turning.
	It is not just medical abuse, this is kind of medieval-level abuse.
	And it is pure evil, what is being done to kids.
	Plastic surgeon Dr. Joss Ting and gynecologist surgeon Marcy Bowers performed a transgender procedure that took twice as long as it typically does.
	Their patient, a 17-year-old male, who had identified as female since age five.
	He was being pushed by his parents.
	No kid at the age of five says, I'm in the wrong body.
	Give me a break.
	Can we just call that what it is?
	A bull faced lie.
	Parents ought to be locked up for this.
	This is worse.
	than the Munchausen by proxy parents.
	My kid's got cancer or whatever, some fatal disease, don't you feel sorry for me?
	This is even worse than that.
	And so, this is a male who said he wanted a vagina.
	Normally, fully developed male sexual organs provide enough skin for a plastic surgeon to create this artificial vagina.
	But, because the boy had been using puberty suppression medication since the age of 11, his sexual organs were very small.
	They were the size and sexual maturity of an 11-year-old.
	Nevertheless, these practitioners performed this mutilation.
	The next day, the patient felt pain and was rushed back to the hospital.
	As I was getting her on the bed, I heard something go pop.
	That was the patient's newly created vagina tearing apart.
	This is disgusting.
	Absolutely disgusting what they do to people who wind up with colostomy bags and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's just mutilation.
	It is barbaric what is happening.
	It is perverted that you would do something like this.
	We've always said, you've got to have your parents' permission, if you're a minor, to get a tattoo.
	Well, you know, tattoos can be removed, but not this kind of stuff.
	You can't drink, you can't drive, you can't have a gun, you can't... Because we understand that they don't have the judgment necessary for all of this stuff.
	To be clear, the group has not rejected gender surgeries on adolescents and its statement only applies to plastic surgery procedures, not other transgender treatments like the hormone treatments.
	But what they're saying is that they want to step back and be cautious about this.
	Calls for hesitation, calls for skepticism.
	It is in stark contrast to numerous professional medical associations that have endorsed, and in some cases championed, medical attempts to change sex characteristics of minors.
	The American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Endocrine Society, the American Psychological Association, they've all embraced this.
	And they've called for unobstructed access to the interventions for children and adolescents.
	Why?
	Because they're profiteering murderers who are out there trying to create lifetime customers, even if they only have a brief life before they commit suicide.
	Ah, but then we've got films showing how tragically wonderful that is, don't we?
	Euthanasia is great, especially if you do it because you got mutilated as a child because of this gender gaslighting.
	And when you look at the psychologists, the AMA, the corrupt AMA, the American Academy of Pediatricians, the Endocrine Society, all these people, from the psychologists down to the pediatricians, they're all preying on children.
	Physically, psychologically, pharmacologically, it's all predatory.
	And they focus primarily on children.
	More plastic surgery is often touted as the last stop on a person's gender transition journey.
	It will be difficult to justify denying it to someone who has already spent years altering their bodies using puberty bloggers and cross-sex hormones.
	Yeah, and we don't have any politicians who are going to stand up to any of this stuff.
	We don't have any politicians who will stand in the gap and defend children.
	A series of attacks on Christians at an apartment complex where they are banning the use of the word Bible.
	This is in a senior apartment complex.
	They decided to ban the word Bible in their community room announcements.
	What they do is they have different special interest groups there.
	These are, it's a senior's apartment complex, so these are people who are just kind of in managed living, but they don't necessarily have debilitating medical conditions.
	They're still able to do many things.
	And so, you know, they want to pursue their interests.
	They put the announcements up there.
	The American Center for Law and Justice has announced it just sent a demand letter to the complex in North Carolina over a decision by managers to violate the religious liberties of residents.
	This is yet another in a series of attacks on Christian residents of senior apartment complexes.
	We continue to defend the right of Christian residents to live out their faith free from censorship.
	In this case, officials banned our client from advertising his Bible study because the advertisement contained the word Bible in it.
	Our client leads a weekly Bible study with fellow residents in one of the complex's small conference rooms.
	Before June, our client was able to advertise his Bible study with no restrictions at all, without notice or any indication that the advertisement violated any sort of policy.
	The complex removed his advertisement and replaced it with spiritual services instead of Bible study.
	Spiritual services is okay.
	Bible study is not.
	When our client approached an employee of the complex, our client was told the managing company does not allow Bible to be included in the activities that appear on the calendar.
	The legal team's announcement said many senior living facilities mistakenly think that they must refrain from association with or mention of faith.
	They said, however, contrary to this belief is the law.
	The FHA, the Fair Housing Act, Prevents these facilities from treating religious activities differently from secular activities.
	Specifically, the Fair Housing Act requires that residents be treated equally without regard to their particular religion, even if the apartment complex was applying a neutral policy.
	If it had a discriminatory effect on a protected class such as religion, federal courts have recognized that a Fair Housing Act violation could still be established.
	So, as that is happening at a local apartment complex in North Carolina, what do you think the UN is doing?
	Well, there's a UN agency that has now put out some speech rules for people.
	Don't say Englishman.
	Englishman.
	Don't say it, because it's got man in the title.
	We gotta ban men.
	We hate men.
	Right?
	They also vetoed terms like forefathers.
	Brotherhood of man.
	Even man's best friend has been blacklisted, and they suggest that instead of talking about man's best friend, you talk about a faithful dog.
	Birth attendant is to be used instead of midwife.
	It's not just, it's everything about men and women and their roles with each other, their complementary roles and things like that.
	So I played that clip the other day from that woman who had a complementarian viewpoint.
	You know, she says, you know, my husband provides things for the family, but he provides for the family.
	I make the family, that type of thing.
	Realize that they have complementary roles.
	They work together as a team for the same purpose.
	But no, we have to pit each other against each other.
	That's what the government always does.
	Got to pit the conservatives against the liberals or Republicans or the Democrats and men from the women and all.
	War, constant war.
	And of course, they've got their own agenda.
	It isn't like they want an egalitarian society.
	They don't like a patriarchy.
	They want to establish a matriarchy, or better yet, where they rule.
	And so, you know, and you can see this type of stuff coming.
	We're talking about Bible study.
	I remember when the NIV was the first one.
	Now a lot of them do it, a lot of the modern Bible translations.
	Uh, well, instead of, uh, brothers do this, I'll say brothers and sisters do this or whatever, you know, so they got to make it inclusive.
	It's like timeout.
	I know where this is headed.
	Yeah.
	That was headed 40 years ago.
	Uh, and that's where the, the, uh, has headed.
	So they're clamping down also in phrases like ladies and gentlemen.
	And maiden name.
	These are basically struggle sessions, right?
	You have to be anti... You have to denounce yourself and all the rest of the stuff.
	This is struggle speech, if you will.
	Englishman, you change that to English person or English national were the alternatives that they supplied.
	They demand to control everything about our speech.
	We are not to question our masters.
	We're not to do anything like that.
	They will tell us what we can say about whatever it is, and they will even dictate to us the words that we can use.
	They will change our vocabulary.
	They will change the language.
	Man in the street should be replaced by ordinary citizen.
	Typical person also be useful.
	Sportsman-like Has to be avoided in favor of fair or sporting or whatever.
	And they've got a whole list of caveman, you got to say cave dweller.
	Midwife, as I said, birth attendant.
	Fisherman.
	No, that's fishers.
	Lumberjack.
	Why lumberjack?
	Oh, well, that implies a guy.
	A guy who's going to climb up a tree and wield, you know, do a physical task like that.
	No, that's got to be woodchopper.
	Woodchopper.
	Postman.
	Hostel carrier.
	Waiter.
	Waitress.
	That's got to be restaurant server.
	Man-made.
	Hand-built.
	Well, not a lot of things that are man-made are not hand-built.
	Anyway, this was from the Daily Skeptic, and they said, you know, Orwell warned us about this.
	He said, banning certain words and phrases to advance a dogmatic political ideology is a hallmark of totalitarianism.
	I guess you can't say dogmatic.
	It's man's best friend, political ideology.
	It's insane.
	In a private school in London, They are debuting the UK's first teacherless classroom using artificial intelligence.
	Teaching with AI-powered adaptive learning, providing each student with a completely personalized learning experience.
	Are we going to have robot tutors next?
	As a matter of fact, several different robot companies have made a lot of advances.
	And of course, they have given a body to the artificial intelligence.
	One of those companies is Neo, and it has a household robot.
	And they're going, they've given this thing extensive testing.
	Two days, two days of living with people in a house.
	That's the kind of testing that we're going to get with a warp speed vaccines and all the rest of this stuff.
	Because, you know, the motto of Silicon Valley is go fast and break things.
	And here's their little propaganda speech.
	See how many issues you can find.
	In a first ever experiment, 1X's Neo Humanoid spent two days living with a human, revealing a series of unexpected results.
	This is partly because Neo demonstrated several intelligent abilities that shocked observers, but just how smart is it already?
	To start, Neo demonstrates a wide array of capabilities while doing chores around the house.
	From making a cup of coffee to assisting with cooking, Neo executed various real-world tasks that require both dexterity and planning.
	On top of this, Neo can also fetch ingredients, hand over utensils, and even engage in simple conversations, including telling jokes.
	But Neo's accelerating ability to learn and adapt to its environment on the fly is what really raises eyebrows.
	This is because by living among humans, NEO constantly gathers data from anyone and anything around it to grow its hive mind intelligence.
	These are the minds of robots around the world.
	It just dropped an egg.
	Gather via a distributed swarm brain.
	This will allow them to manufacture themselves and spawn into self-organizing groups of robots.
	Oh, that's nice.
	And respond to the needs of humans more effectively on a person by person basis.
	And as for autonomy, NEO uses a combination of AI models to learn and gradually increase its autonomous functionality over time.
	On top of this, NEO can also be teleoperated to help expedite its learning process by imitation.
	Importantly, this approach allows for continuous improvement and over the air updates to the robot, so that the same hardware can become increasingly useful over time.
	And concerning safety, firstly, the robot uses only low kinetic energy by design in order to minimize the risk of it accidentally injuring humans.
	Moreover, NEO is programmed to recognize and avoid dangerous situations, respect physical boundaries, and self-recover from potential failures.
	Furthermore, NEO prevents bad actors from gaining control of it and going rogue inside of your home.
	Weren't we told all this about the government?
	Haha!
	This is a video about the new NEO robot.
	This focus on cyber security is intended to prevent swarms of robots from suddenly being hijacked and going rogue en masse.
	Furthermore, One X is offering 24-hour support for its robots for the quickest resolution of any control issues that may arise around the robot and its operations or access.
	And when it comes to NEO's expected price per unit, One X will likely institute some kind of leasing strategy.
	This would involve users first paying a few thousand dollars up front as a kind of safety deposit to take delivery of the robot.
	Then they'd continue to pay monthly subscription fees for the robot's ongoing intelligence.
	You'll own nothing.
	Yeah, would you like to have that extra modulo over there so the robot doesn't drop eggs on the floor and the counter?
	You know, that's going to cost you a little bit more.
	You know, just like the heated seats that you can rent from BMW and that type of thing.
	Yeah, you'll own nothing.
	You just give them several thousand dollars as your entry fee in it, and then you can pay them every month forever.
	And it's great because these things are always learning, and they're always sharing what they learn.
	Where did we hear that before?
	We heard that about the self-driving cars.
	They're going to be so much better drivers than humans because, you know, they're all learning from each other's experience.
	It's a hive mind.
	They're all connected.
	And so when one of them encounters difficulty at an intersection and doesn't know how to get across that four-way stop or whatever, it figures it out.
	It passes it on to all the rest of them.
	No, that isn't the way it worked.
	They all collected at one intersection, just stopped.
	Clogged everything, many other failure modes that they've done.
	Uh, so, uh, again, um, you know, when you start hearing.
	Terms like spawn and swarm and it's going to be sharing information and I was going to sharing information about his experience of sharing information about the family.
	It reminds me very much.
	I can see a point at which, um, not too far in the future.
	Where you've got another LaLa-type candidate.
	You know what?
	Everybody needs to have their own personal robot.
	You know, we just need to have that.
	Their own personal minder.
	Their own personal snitch.
	Who's going to be watching everything that you do.
	And of course, as I've said for the longest time, the Third Amendment was to prevent that from happening.
	You know, the British had put soldiers in homes and said, well, you know, we need to have a place to house them, so you do it.
	We've got a mandate that you do it.
	And those soldiers weren't just sitting there on the couch asking for chips and salsa.
	They were spying on the people that were there.
	I remember it was only about a decade ago that we had David Petraeus, when he was director of the CIA, said, we're going to have smart refrigerators.
	And they're going to be able to listen to your conversation.
	They're going to be able to report stuff to it.
	He said it.
	And when we reported it, we were called the conspiracy theorists.
	It was him who was saying it.
	And of course that is true.
	All of these so-called smart devices, self-monitoring and reporting technology are all there to spy on you all the time.
	The robots are really smart.
	They're super smart.
	They're constantly monitoring you.
	Constantly reporting it.
	And we talk about bad actors hacking into a system like this, where everything is all connected.
	You got one central hive mind that they could tap into and reprogram.
	And isn't it interesting that about the only film, about the only book that hasn't been turned into a film, the only book by Michael Crichton that hasn't been turned into a film, is Robopocalypse, where people did exactly that.
	They took over the self-driving cars, took over the robots, started using that to create absolute total chaos.
	It has, again, a hive mind, an internet of bots, surveillance, profiling, security, a swarm, a hive mind, all of this stuff.
	Very concerning.
	I can just imagine that that'll be the next teachers that they have, right?
	Because if they want to have a teacherless school in London, and this is being touted as some great thing, not having a person that you can talk to, perhaps, I don't know, is the robot going to be able to do the same kind of gender gaslighting?
	Will they give it like purple hair or something?
	You know, I can change my body at any time I want to.
	You should be able to as well, as a human.
	What are they going to use these robots for?
	What are the values that it's going to be transmitting?
	This novel approach of having artificial intelligence, no teachers, encapsulates the very essence of student-centered education.
	No, the education is not centered on the student.
	It's centralized control of the education of all the students.
	It is a kind of hive mind already.
	Adaptive learning systems also highlight when students begin to struggle and can direct students to additional materials and also act as a virtual tutor.
	Again, they're talking about just using AI in the classroom.
	But when you look at what is really on board, where they want to put robots in the factories, robots in the homes, as butlers, as maids, as waiters and waitresses, When you look at that, how far away are we from having a C-3PO?
	Master Luke, I can't believe that you did that.
	It's not that far away.
	And that's not really the future that we want.
	Teachers and tutors are some of the next groups of white-collar workers that are on the chopping block to be replaced with AI and robots, writes Wine Press News.
	And he's absolutely right.
	And guess what?
	When we see teachers and tutors, what I think of is parents.
	Because parents are what are really on the chopping block.
	Anyway, look at this horrible family that this kid who shot up and murdered people in Georgia came from.
	The mother's got a mugshot because she's been involved in meth and all the rest of the stuff.
	Now, she's the good guy out of the two parents.
	She's the one who gave them a half-hour warning.
	But even with three cops permanently assigned as their primary job to this school, nothing really was done about it.
	They've now arrested the father, who also had a very dodgy background.
	This is about sending a message about how parents are evil.
	About how parents are going to be held responsible for what their children do, even though they keep taking the children away.
	So you have no input on this.
	We're going to tell the children, and if you disagree with what we're telling the children, then you're cut off.
	And yet, if they do gender gaslighting and the kind of things that we saw with the tranny killer in Nashville, they take a child who may have some issues already and really hop on that child and turn them into a monster.
	No, we'll come after the parents as well.
	Because, you know, the government never does anything wrong.
	It's always the parents.
	It's always the family.
	That's why the government needs to train our children.
	Well, Republican voters got a lot more socially liberal under Trump, says Reason.
	And again, Reason is not there because they're interested in trying to move the society in one direction or the other.
	Why did that happen?
	Is it because we have spent so much time excusing his behavior?
	If we excuse Trump's behavior, then why not have our behavior excused as well?
	I mean, you know, hey, if he can be a hero and a savior to the world, divorcing his wives and then publicly humiliating them, it's not just a divorce.
	I mean, that's become so commonplace in society, but nobody humiliates their exes like Trump does.
	So in the usual liberal account, Trump reawakened America's atavistic, bigoted side, driving both the Republican Party and the U.S.
	to the right, says Reason.
	In the usual conservative retort, it's the left that became more extreme in the 2010s, adopting radical views on race and gender that meant a moderate could seem to be moving rightward when in fact he was standing still.
	But there's a third possibility, says Reason.
	That liberals spent the decade moving leftward on questions of race and sexual orientation, and so did conservatives.
	Because, see, Trump is really kind of a controlled opposition.
	Controlled opposition for control.
	It wasn't 4-D chess.
	It was 2-D chess.
	2-D chess that you play on a two-dimensional thing like a television.
	And here's what the two Ds are.
	Derangement and delusion.
	Derangement for the left, delusion for the right.
	That's your 2D chest.
	Things to go moderate on abortion.
	You know, you normalize this, you do that.
	It's just the kind of things that we have seen from our leaders.
	We're going to take a quick break and we're going to have our guest join us.
	Before I take a break, I've got a couple of comments here I want to read as well.
	On Rumble, Bill Jones, 1213.
	Thank you.
	And he says, thank you for all you do, David.
	Well, I appreciate that.
	On Rumble, Wild Niagara says, Ciprofloxacin.
	Almost caused me to commit suicide.
	That's what's the derivative of that.
	They got my son.
	They keep changing the name.
	They don't call it Cipro anymore.
	People caught on to Cipro.
	So, you understand what we're going through.
	I hope you're better.
	If you found something that helped you, please let us know.
	Rockfan, Scott Helmer.
	Thank you very much, Scott.
	Good to see you there.
	So, sending prayers and healing to your family, David.
	Never give up.
	Thank you so much, Scott.
	I appreciate that.
	A great singer-songwriter, go to, look him up on the streaming services.
	He's got some great songs, really does, about a lot of different topics.
	Even does some about the pandemic and things like that.
	On Rockfin, Marlon Halvorsen, thank you for the tip.
	On rumble, Radisbro, thank you, says a million machine March.
	That's from animatrix soon.
	Yeah, that's what I'm worried about.
	The swarm, the robo apocalypse.
	That's really what we got to worry about.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, and now joining us is John Richardson.
	He is the founder and CEO of Richardson Nutrition Center.
	You can kind of remember that as RNC.
	It's the good RNC.
	And so, Richardson Nutrition Center, they promote wellness, healthy living through the use of safe and effective dietary supplements to help the body's natural healing processes.
	I wanted to get him back on.
	We had a very interesting talk last time.
	We talked about B-17 and other things.
	I've had a chance to sample some of his products as well.
	Thank you for joining us, John.
	My pleasure, David.
	As I said, you're one of my heroes and so I've followed you for a long time and so it's actually a pleasure to get on with people that are like-minded so that we can let your audience know about these truths and bring it into what's going on right now, right as we speak.
	Oh yeah, and as we speak in just the last couple of days, I mean, we had, yesterday I think it was, Kate Middleton, you know, the future queen, I guess, who's been struggling with cancer, but they've been very closed-lipped about it.
	They do not want her to even mention what kind of cancer she has.
	At first it was just, oh, she's got some kind of a stomach issue, whatever.
	Then they admitted that it was cancer.
	But they won't say what kind of cancer it is.
	Of course, they do that with Charles as well.
	And she just finished a course of chemo.
	But I thought it was also interesting that at the same time we had Elle Macpherson, model and actress, people will remember.
	She also had cancer, but she treated it without chemo and said she beat it without chemo.
	And she talked in an article about all the struggles that she'd had with her family because It's the way the medical community puts pressure on you and makes you afraid to try anything other than what they are offering.
	And that's really the big obstacle that she had to overcome, was to try to think outside the medical box that they put everybody into.
	It's very interesting.
	Yeah, it's fascinating because I have like three degrees of separation from her and I usually when I commit to that I'm going to get to talk to somebody.
	She came out here to Arizona and lived here eight months, you know, right in this neighborhood basically because, you know, Arizona, as people that don't know, is one of the Free estates for nutritional therapy for all diseases.
	They have schools, they have educational institutes, they have Dr. Henry Ely's out here.
	We just had a doctor come by, Dr. Martin, that came by the office and he used to use B-17 regularly in the 70s and 80s and then he told me it disappeared right about the time my dad disappeared.
	Whatever happened to my dad.
	I can't, you know, I don't have any factual information about that.
	They took him out, but it sure is strange that three of the most prominent doctors using B-17 and a laetrile and the treatment of the C word were all, all died within six months of each other back in the late eighties.
	Wow.
	Yeah, last time we talked I said, you know, see the same thing with Carey Mullis and the PCR test, you know, just before this whole thing rolled out, that PCR test that was used by Fauci to give the impression that they were measuring things legitimately, that they were doing real science and measurement and everything.
	He called Fauci a fraud in the way that he said, you're abusing that, you're trying, you can't prove that there's an HIV virus that's causing AIDS by using my PCR thing.
	He says, whatever is causing it.
	He said, what you're doing is not science and you can't be, so he disappeared at that point in time as well.
	I mean, when you look at what the pharmaceutical companies are doing, when they know what they're doing, and this is now coming out over and over again, when you look at the vaccines and everything, they knew with tests
	The adverse effects that were happening significantly and in the past when there was an oppositional FDA they would stop when there was far less risk and far less harm they would stop these drugs but now they know they can do anything that they wish and so if they Have that kind of a calculation where they really don't care how many people they hurt or kill.
	There's not really anything's going to stop them from whatever they want to do if they're strictly focused on the money.
	It's truly amazing.
	Let's say the whole system is made that way.
	No drug gets approved unless it's profitable.
	No FDA approvals on vitamins.
	There's no FDA approval on zinc or vitamin C. You can't, as a physician, legally tell your patient you're treating their cancer with vitamin C, even though Linus Pauling won awards back in the 70s and 80s.
	So it's really A situation where people are waking up from it because of this COVID.
	Unfortunately, we had to go through this, this medical tyranny.
	But people are truly waking up to the fact that we've been lied to about so many things.
	And the good thing for me is that God has given me all of this material to where I feel stronger than ever.
	I've known all this for 30 years, David.
	But when I would go out to try to tell people, I'd only have my dad's story and G. Edward Griffin's story.
	We've talked about G. Edward Griffin in A World Without Cancer.
	Ed, who's 93, says he doesn't know anybody that's ever died of cancer that regularly eats amygdalin, apricot seeds, nitrilocytes, whatever the name is that you want to call it.
	But they have, they systematically, just like this situation with Kate Middleton, just like the King, they've systematically covered up the fact that he, the King that got cancer said, told the world he's not going to use chemotherapy, radiation surgery, but you don't hear that anywhere.
	You don't hear that except in quiet circles.
	He's using natural remedies and it wouldn't surprise me if Kate Middleton also did that.
	Like you said.
	No, they wouldn't.
	They don't tell us what it is.
	We've got fake pictures.
	yourself, uh, you know, if she's successfully helping herself with natural remedies, they're not going to tell us that.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	They're not going to tell us the cancer.
	They wouldn't tell us what the, the, what she's using for treatment either, would they?
	No, we wouldn't.
	Yeah.
	They don't tell us what it is.
	And we, we got fake pictures.
	It's all, it's all a psyop and the battles are raging on, as you know, and you and I are not on opposite sides about much, and I'm sure if we were, we could convince each other, but we do know this, that they lie to us constantly.
	And that we have a, we have to have a skeptical mind anytime something's presented to us as fact, because the truth is there's, there's.
	They've covered things up so many times and lied about so many things that even people that we otherwise might trust might have bad information, but we have to go dig deeper.
	And that's what I do at RNC.
	It's Richardson Nutritional Center for anybody who thinks that I'm part of the RNC.
	It is funny that I've had people contact me and said, you got to get rid of that Rona Daniels or I'm not going to support you anymore.
	And I said, well, I'm right there with you.
	I support you on that.
	But my dad came up with Richardson Nutritional Center back in the 70s because his patients would come to see him and then they would go home and not be able to get it because they were making a vitamin illegal that was being proven without a shadow of a doubt to help prevent the C-word and help people use their immune system to fight it off.
	Yeah, I remember when that was in the early 90s.
	The FDA was trying to outlaw vitamin C especially, right?
	And even that, but they were going to regulate the amount that you could have of all these different vitamins that you could sell over the counter.
	I remember the Libertarian Party was, that year I went to it, it was in Salt Lake City.
	And Orrin Hatch spoke there, about the only thing we'd agree with him on.
	And it was because, kind of like with Tom Emmer, you know, he opposes CBDC because he's connected to people who are selling crypto stuff.
	Well, Orrin Hatch was connected with people who were selling supplements in the supplement industry.
	And so he was opposing it.
	You know, I don't know that he would oppose it.
	We were opposing it on principle.
	He was opposing it on the principle in terms of cash, right?
	Right, right.
	How much money hit his bank account.
	Two different types of principle.
	So, but, you know, for whatever reason, you know, we would join forces.
	And so it's kind of interesting to see Orrin Hatch addressing the Libertarian Party, trying to stop the FDA from stopping people being able to have even vitamins.
	I mean, that's where these people have been for the longest time.
	It's all about serving the interests of the pharmaceutical people.
	It's kind of interesting, too, when we look at Al McPherson.
	She said that she had breast cancer.
	She got it seven years ago.
	And she said when it first showed up, she said she had a lumpectomy in 2017, seven years ago.
	The doctors wanted her to do mastectomy, radiation, hormonal therapy, breast reconstruction, chemotherapy.
	She said, I chose a holistic approach.
	She said saying no to standard medical solutions was the hardest thing I've ever done in my life.
	But saying no to my own inner sense would have been even harder.
	And she talks about how her family, one of her sons was with her on that decision, and the other one was like, this is absolutely not going to work.
	And so it was a struggle within her family, it was a struggle with herself, the fear of trying something that the establishment is telling you that you can't do.
	But I think what we've seen in the last couple of years, we've seen the establishment so thoroughly discredit itself.
	I think that really does help people a lot.
	But she did it before that happened.
	Kind of interesting.
	Yeah, it's a fascinating story.
	Like I said, she used to date Andy Wakefield, who I know intimately from the whole battle on autism and how the general public still thinks that they've never proven a link between vaccines and autism.
	But that could not be further from the truth, David, but you could go out and do a poll Outside of any hotel in downtown, a city in any blue city in the country.
	And it'd probably be the majority of people think, Oh, that's, that's been disproven.
	That's not the case.
	And so we have been so inundated with medical misinformation because of the profit motive.
	And, and also the fact that like, they like to keep population control and they like to keep us controlled because there's no better way to control us as a, as a people than by our health.
	If you can control our health, David, you can control everything.
	It doesn't matter how much money you have, you'll trade it all for your health.
	And the situations are obvious.
	But when we get something like when we come out with a lump or bump, we believe that is the disease.
	And this is what I'm here to tell your audience.
	I'm not here to tell you to go to the doctor.
	The lump or the bump, even the lump she cut out of her breast is not the disease.
	Let me repeat, that is not the disease.
	No different than if you get chicken pox, you wouldn't cut the little pimples off of your arm to try to cure chicken pox.
	That is what they've done for 50 or 60 years.
	Failing dreadfully, miserably, so much so that the recent woman who was on, Tucker Carlson, gave up her surgery career.
	She was at Stanford Hospital.
	She was a top of her class.
	I can't, Carrie, I think, Carrie Means, I can't, Callie Means, I think is her name.
	If your producer can help us find that name.
	She gave up her career, she was just on Tom Carlson, and she broke this news, and her brother was a, he would raise funds to try to battle, he was one of the people that She convinced the politicians to go with more pharmaceutical drugs.
	I don't know, my brain's not working to find these words this morning, but she quit her career because all she said she was ever taught to do, she put in her resignation, all she was ever taught to do is cut things out of people's body and then bill them for it.
	She never learned the entire system of how it worked.
	That's right.
	Cancer is an entire body system failure.
	It means that you have a deficiency disease that cannot fight back the cancer.
	So if you start by cutting out a lump or bump, all you're doing is releasing it.
	It's almost guaranteed to come back.
	Chemotherapy is just a drug, a deadly poisonous drug that does kill a cancer, but it also kills all your healthy cells.
	So people's hair falls out, their nails fall out, their teeth get loose, they lose their appetite, they lose weight.
	Radiation is simply an x-ray pointed at the tumor trying to reduce it.
	Again, killing the symptom.
	The reason why we have that tumor is because it's surrounding the cancer.
	It's killing the symptom, and it may shrink, but it's not going to go away.
	These people end up dying anyway, and we've watched the statistics.
	Over 90% of the people that go into that system with chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, over 90% of them die within seven years.
	It's a death It's a death cult.
	Cancer is the same death cult that we had with COVID, except we did it over 50 years and 60 years.
	And people like Hans Nieper, Dr. Hans Nieper, who treated President Ronald Reagan for cancer with Laetrile and metabolic therapy in 1985.
	He had stage four colon cancer.
	He treated it and he couldn't even tell people about it until later in life.
	And he wrote, he wrote books and information, but president Ronald Reagan, who, you know, signed the law that said that you couldn't sue a pharmaceutical company.
	He was, he was convinced he was a good man, I believe, but he was convinced by these pharmaceutical companies that they needed to have this protection.
	Otherwise we weren't going to be able to help children in the future.
	Now we have 72 vaccines.
	We have, you know, kids in California get 72 shots by the time they're five years old.
	and our health is deteriorating because the more medicine they stick into us that's supposed to help our immune system, the more we deny God's medicine, which is what, Lantrel, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, all these vitamins we need, they have us go away from those instead of going to them when we get disease.
	That's pretty amazing.
	You're talking about Ronald Reagan and the doctor who secretly treated him.
	You know, they really try to keep that a secret, whatever anybody is suffering from, the presence.
	We've got to have this image that they're invincible, but also they don't want people to know that.
	It's truly amazing because Reagan that would have been and he was maybe in his early to mid 70s at that point in time and I think he'd lived to his early 90s didn't he?
	Yeah he lived 19 years past stage 4 cancer.
	He was extremely petrified.
	I've interviewed A man who was on his staff literally from Connecticut who knew Dr. Hans Nieper and helped work with this and he knew that he was shipped off to a Navy vessel off the coast of West Germany because Dr. Hans Nieper was from West Germany.
	He was also connected With Sloan-Kettering, Dr. Hans Lieber was, when they were doing this study.
	So he knew that Laetrile worked in the mid-70s, but they lied about it.
	So he continued to use this in his practice, helping people with nutritional therapy for cancer, but he was also sworn to secrecy.
	So actually, his speechwriter didn't even put that Reagan had cancer until after he passed away, and then he just mentioned that he had colon cancer, but he cured it naturally.
	It's documented that he cut a little piece of his colon out, but avoided chemotherapy and radiation altogether, and that would have changed the world, David, in 1985, three years before my dad died.
	It would have changed the world, but they kept it quiet and he lived 19 years and died of senility basically 19 years later after he had stage four terminal cancer in his first presidency.
	And no one knows this story.
	We have all the documentation.
	We are putting it out there and look at the similarities between Trump and Reagan when they both were pro vaccines and pro big pharma because they had so much pressure.
	They were both shot at, both had attempted assassinations and they both on the face value both believe in freedom of choice and natural answers to disease.
	So you know, of course, when you look at the gag order that they put on Hans Nieper about that, it's very much like when I started out of the program with I started talking about the debate and I said, yes, a big pageant and everything.
	I played a clip from Wag the Dog and when they get the Hollywood director there, they said, you're going to, you're going to create a war for us.
	It's going to be a pageant, but you can't tell anybody about it.
	You can never tell anybody about it because we're going to kill you if you tell anybody about it.
	You know that type of thing.
	And the fact that they would do that to cover up a cancer treatment that would be an opposition to what the big pharmaceutical companies want to do.
	That truly is amazing with Ronald Reagan.
	Now, of course, that book.
	You've held up a couple of books there, Hans Nieper and another one that was the study that they did.
	Those books are available at RNC as well, right?
	Yeah, we have rncstore.com.
	You can use the discount code that people know about that should be in the description that they can get discount on all the documents that we have.
	We've put together the most extensive list of proving documents that we can and we have thousands more documents to go.
	I mean, this is just the strangest things we find from this vault and it says How to legally avoid unwanted immunizations of all kinds.
	This was a document produced back in the 1980s when people knew about natural answers, but they were trying to get this out there.
	Now with the internet, at least on shows like yours, we can get this truth out there, but we have so much documentation they've covered up.
	And how do we get it, David?
	It was hidden away to keep it from the raids of the three-letter agencies.
	The president of an organization called the Cancer Control Society.
	Hit it away to keep it from the three letter agencies that were raiding his home in Northern California.
	And so he put it in containers and we've brought it to Arizona to a location to be named later.
	We're scanning it.
	We're going through it.
	We're finding, I mean, literally newspaper clippings that were getting reproduced.
	Yeah.
	about Laetrelle on FDA's safe list, and then a poster that they put out, the FDA put out, saying how it's unsafe and unnatural.
	We've got patriots marshalling forces to fight medocrats.
	Does that sound like something that could come out of a newspaper article from today?
	It's like history repeats itself.
	And then here's an author that wrote a book in the 60s who predicted his own arrest just from telling people about Laetrelle and B17 therapy, basically as a natural answer to the C word.
	Now, doctors have always gotten in trouble.
	From saying that it treats cancer and that's what we want to avoid in this day and age so we can let doctors know just use it for their patients, use it for their people just as a support for the immune system just like vitamin C, vitamin D or anything else.
	So that's one of our messages we have at RNC store as well.
	Not only do we have the products available, the information available, we also counsel doctors who are across the country are waking up in droves, not woke, But waking up and grow that natural answers, not only does it help the patients get out of the system, but they can also have a wonderful career helping people naturally, even as an MD.
	You can use a mixture of some orthodox medicine, especially with surgeries and accidents and things like that.
	But if you can be proactive on getting people the right nutrition that they need, doctors, MDs are learning right now that that's the path to the future.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I'm surprised with all those documents that you had there.
	We didn't see anything from the FDA saying this is for horses, y'all.
	You know, it's that kind of stuff.
	They have completely destroyed their credibility.
	That's the only good thing that's come out of the last four years is that people have finally seen how they operate.
	And I had seen how they operated before this because they pulled the same stuff with COVID That they had done for their annual flu shot stuff and everything.
	It's like, well, we've seen this before.
	We know exactly where they're going.
	We know exactly the kind of manipulation and propaganda that they used to people.
	But they went even farther this time and really destroyed their credibility.
	You know, we talk about Ronald Reagan in 1985.
	Having natural therapy and other things like that, and surviving and not having chemotherapy.
	That was not too long after that.
	It was in about a two-year period, not even, about a year and a half.
	My father had cancer, and he got chemotherapy, and his first time they gave him chemotherapy, he went into a coma, and he died a few days later from the chemotherapy.
	He didn't die from cancer, he died from their chemotherapy.
	Same thing could have happened to Ronald Reagan.
	And if he hadn't gone with a natural thing instead, he wound up living for another 19 years.
	A tale of two different things.
	Yeah, it's amazing.
	Yeah, a friend of mine, Dr. Rashid Batar, who was most likely murdered, you know, I just try to tell the truth even though people go, oh, he was most likely murdered.
	I was texting him back and forth.
	when he said he was poisoned, he was definitely poisoned, and whether he was eventually murdered by that or it was the effect of that poisoning, anyway, he was taken out, but he made it well known as an MD that 90% of the people that got cancer died of the treatment from the cancer.
	90% of the people.
	And so you might be better off, and this is blasphemy, you might be better off just going home and enjoying the rest of your life instead of getting these poisons, Like you said, your dad was given a treatment.
	You know how many times I hear that people are given their first dose of chemotherapy, and they're so sick afterwards, they're like, I didn't feel this sick ever during this whole bout with cancer.
	So, even that, and the FDA had to admit, David, as you joked about colite horse paste, They had to admit that amygdala without a doubt caused people to get off painkillers.
	Our whole medical system David has become where painkillers, pain is the symptom that everyone wants to fix.
	If you've got something wrong with you, you've got to get a painkiller to get that pain away.
	It doesn't have anything to do with taking care of the disease.
	So we're taking pharmaceutical drugs for painkillers or antivirals or antibacterial and anti this and that to get rid of pain when that's a symptom of what's wrong.
	That's tells your body telling you, God telling you, you're doing something wrong.
	Yeah.
	Stop eating that thing.
	Stop doing that thing.
	Stop drinking that alcohol or doing whatever you're doing that's unhealthy.
	Learn, fix the problem.
	And that's what we've gotten away from and that's what we're getting back to is resolving the underlying problem so that we don't die soon.
	We don't die of the treatments instead of dying from quote-unquote the deficiency disease which we don't have to die.
	Ed Griffin, 93, the Hunzas who he documented lived in the turn of the century lived to be 120, 130 years old and they ate up to 200 apricot seeds a day.
	I'm not saying here that apricot seeds are the all-encompassing answer to every disease on the planet, but I have studies that I found in this vault where famous, world-famous dentists proved that cavities were actually a deficiency of vitamin B17.
	Believe it or not, David, we found that information.
	This has been covered up.
	Of course it's much more profitable to drill holes and fill with things and do all sorts of treatments.
	I'm not saying dentists are all bad, but there's natural answers to the things that go on in our mouth, just as proven over history as there are all these medical answers.
	Yeah, you stop and think about, you know, vitamin C and rickets.
	I mean, that's just a deficiency in vitamin C. There's all different types of things.
	I know what you meant.
	Rickets is vitamin D.
	2.4 million people died a year, David, back 300 years ago.
	Yeah, 2.4 million people died a year, David, back 300 years ago.
	And that's a natural, easy answer.
	We don't know about scurvy.
	The same thing is going on with B17.
	It's just so hard for us to believe it.
	They want to keep us in fear, just like they did with COVID, so that we try this vaccine, which is not a vaccine at all.
	It's been well proven.
	It's a gene therapy.
	No question about it.
	No question that more people have died from the results of that vaccine than ever died of COVID.
	The treatments for COVID is what killed people.
	And this is information that You know, three years ago probably would have got me put in jail, but people were saying back three years ago, and now it's coming out in the general public.
	So people are more skeptical of the medical establishment than they've ever been.
	And time to wake up!
	Yeah, oh yeah, it is.
	And I wish, you know, and they pull this stuff on us all the time.
	I'm just at the point now where I'm absolutely done with the medical community.
	After what happened, you know, first I told you what happened to my father, then my son gets ciprofloxacin, well it's not actually that, it was of that family, of the floxacin family.
	Same thing as chemotherapy and the people are talking about says it's the same exact thing.
	It continues to attack your body, continues to attack your mitochondria after you take it, even just a small amount of it.
	And when I start looking online to see if I can find some natural remedies or things like that, what I see are, you know, from WebMD and these other places, Well, you should have some SSRIs if you're having trouble sleeping.
	It's like, are you kidding me?
	SSRIs?
	Or they say gabapentin.
	Gabapentin was something they gave my wife after she had a hip replacement and it caused her to have all kinds of issues, just the initial dosage of that.
	It took us quite a while to get her detoxed from that.
	Made her pass out, all the rest of the stuff.
	It was just amazing.
	To see these things that they just prescribe them like candy.
	They'll go down and these doctors, you talked about the doctor who said, well, my only job was to cut things out of people, you know.
	Well, the other doctors, their prescription is to look at a table of symptoms and then tell you what the pharmaceutical industry wants you to take at the moment.
	And without any regard to any kind of safety concerns and they don't tell you what the safety concerns are.
	It's just amazing.
	They don't have any tests that test them all together.
	No matter what they say about a drug test, it's always tested by itself.
	They do that so that there's, you know, they call these double blind studies.
	They test that one drug by itself.
	It's never tested with two, three, four, five vaccines, 72 vaccines.
	That never happens.
	Even when they try to say they've done safety tests, most of them, a couple of people died or a couple of people had heart failure, a couple of people had liver.
	And now, They allow hundreds of people to die before they take a drug off the market.
	And this whole thing, one of the things we talked about was Zuckerberg coming out and now saying that he was convinced not to let people know about natural answers to COVID.
	He was convinced, he was strong-armed.
	It's amazing, David, to hear that, to hear that information coming out.
	But I think Zuckerberg is like the rat leaving the sinking vessel.
	He literally has seen that things he's done has killed people.
	People have had heart attacks because of him.
	People have lost their children because of him.
	And so it's all well and good that at this 11th hour, when it's all coming out everywhere, that he's going to jump ship and kind of try to throw the administration under the bus.
	But the truth is he knew.
	He knew very well.
	He lied over and over again.
	And so I'm one of those people, yes, I believe God can forgive people, you know, whatever they've done in their lives.
	But I'm one of the people that still thinks that we need to pursue him paying for this.
	He needs to pay for this, this evil lying.
	Yeah, you can, you can say it.
	I admit it.
	And I give him credit for that instead of waiting for him to be completely taken out later.
	But I don't forgive him and I don't forget it.
	And I'm not the one to judge him.
	God will be the one to judge him, but our criminal justice system needs to deal with him whatever happens.
	I'm not saying it's going to, David, but that's what I'm putting out there.
	And I'm not afraid of Facebook and Zuckerberg, just like what happened with the CEO of YouTube.
	The powers that be, the evil ones that want us dead don't care who they kill.
	They're a death cult.
	And this woman who supported the vaccine and pushed the vaccine and told everybody to get it, died of turbo cancer at 54, can't even pronounce her name, but she was the CEO of YouTube that probably kicked you off, kicked me off.
	I had a channel with subscribers and got kicked off because I was just telling people about natural answers and she lost her life.
	And they don't care.
	Yeah.
	They kick me off for telling people about the Federal Reserve.
	They'll kick you off for anything.
	Well, like Ed Griffin.
	They call Ed Griffin a right-wing extremist because he told people the truth about the Federal Reserve and Creature from Jekyll Island and told people the truth about cancer.
	Fifty years ago, David, and even patriots or people that are right-minded People still think cancer is the lump of the bump or they think it's something we catch or it's something, some chemical they give us.
	No!
	It's our immune system not having the proper nutrition, the enzymes and I think I've mentioned this to you about the professor at Loyola University who came out in 1978 and said that this may be the end to breast cancer.
	His name is Dr. Harold Manor.
	He was the head of biology at Loyola University for 30 years and he studied amygdala with mice that were bred to grow breast cancers and wiped out 89% of the cancers and said this may mean the end of mastectomies and he was fired in the 1970s, left penniless and had to move to Mexico and actually died 90 days before my father in 1988.
	Wow!
	Wow!
	That's amazing!
	Yeah, and I really want to thank you for persisting on this.
	Because, you know, as these people are so persistent, we have to be equally persistent to tell people the truth, as persistent as they are to try to cover it up.
	I think many times my wife was protesting an abortion clinic in Austin.
	They had a sign that said, Stop Black Genocide, you know.
	And they had the lefties show up.
	It was the first time we'd seen Antifa people.
	And they showed up with a black sign.
	They didn't have anything to say.
	They just want to stop you from saying what you're saying.
	And so, he'd try to hold in front of her sign.
	She'd go down below him, and he'd go down, and she'd go up behind.
	They're going up and down, up and down to show this thing.
	It's just amazing that they just want to silence people.
	And we know what it is that they want to do.
	Now, you were talking about Zuckerberg.
	You've got an article, extensive article, talking about this.
	Tell people where they can find that.
	Well, it's on our website at rncstore.com.
	If you use the forward slash newsletter, you just sign up for it.
	You just put your name and your email.
	I know people are cautious about that.
	We don't use it for, you know, spamming people, but this is where we can send out this information.
	We have all the research about what Zuckerberg said and what he did and, you know, just explaining to people that it's not time to go, Oh, let's go jump back on Facebook.
	And now they're telling the truth because Zuckerberg's seen the light.
	Just know he's covering his butt.
	He's just covering his rear.
	And they brainwashed the entire world by censoring and deplatforming.
	And it's not something you can just Ask forgiveness to get away from.
	They need to, if he really means it.
	We'll see if that's just a news cycle and it came out and said that Trump was a bad, you know, ASS for, for standing up.
	And it's all like you said, David, just like my good friend, Geo Griffin, it's all this play we're watching and we don't know where it's all going to come down, but we have to fight our own battle.
	We have to, That's why we can't just leave our health up to the powers that be.
	We can't leave our information up to the powers that be at Google and Facebook.
	We have to hold them to account and continue telling the truth.
	And like your wife, if you get censored here, you move it over here.
	If you get censored there, you move it over here.
	We're on, I think you're on the Rumble Channel and I think maybe we're on live right now on Rumble Channel, which I think is a great platform.
	It seems like they're not censoring information and things are starting to go viral.
	People are starting to realize that they want the truth about health freedom or political freedom or even financial freedom, that they gotta go to a platform that doesn't censor the truth, no matter what the truth is.
	And I'm a person that believes, Freedom of speech is the most important freedom we have because if you and I can't disagree about something without being shut off or one of the other of us being told to go away, then we're not really a free people.
	We're not free and we're never going to battle against this tyranny without freedom of speech and freedom of opportunity to get our message out there.
	Oh, absolutely.
	And it's ridiculous what they're doing now.
	I just saw there was an article in Germany.
	The German government is coming after some guy because on social media he called a German minister fat.
	Well, she actually is fat, you know, but it was what they're really after is they're saying you don't have the freedom to insult.
	And that's especially true of our masters, our political masters.
	But this is a few years ago, you had Rowan Atkinson, the comedian in the UK, said, please feel free to insult me.
	You know, we must be able to keep this freedom of speech, you know, without it.
	He was saying we don't have any comedy but we also don't have any freedom to say anything if you can shut somebody down because you hurt their feelings about it because you said something that was mean-spirited.
	The reality is is that if they shut down our speech, that is the key thing.
	That is why it was number one on the list of Bill of Rights that Madison and other people added to the Constitution, because it is so foundational.
	I've said before, I think it is even more foundational than the Second Amendment.
	You're not even going to know who to shoot at if you don't know it.
	You don't have free speech, right?
	I mean, you will not even rise up against tyranny, let alone resist it in any way, shape, or form if you don't know that the tyranny is happening.
	And that's why the tyrants come after free speech.
	And it is a program that is designed to enslave us, designed to kill us.
	And that's what the medical side is all about.
	And so it continues to escalate.
	We've got several people who have left messages here.
	We're on live on Rockfin.
	Scott Helmer, thank you for the tip.
	He says, please post this full interview to David's X account so it can be shared with friends and family.
	And we do.
	We do that every day.
	We will pull out every interview that we do.
	We put it on our Rumble channel and on Rockfin and on BitChute and YouTube and we put it on our X account.
	So we do that every day as well as Gab.
	We put it on Gab as well.
	And so, you know, every interview that we do is up there.
	We'll also pull out a couple of clips from the show as well as the full show.
	I'll always be up there.
	And on Rockfin, Jessica Morrow, thank you for the tip, says, thank you, David, especially for your show today.
	I am a longtime listener, and I've been diagnosed with stage 4 melanoma.
	I'm 46 and a mother of two.
	Your topic today is so true.
	I have dealt with two different hospitals here in the Northeast, one of them being quite famous for cancer treatment, and all they want to do is a single protocol of drugs down my throat or in my arm.
	It's very sad.
	It is sad.
	I'm guessing Mayo Clinic and here's a funny, not a funny story.
	I just want to tell her to take heart because I have a friend whose name is Rick Hill who's celebrating his 50th year of being cancer free when he was sent home at the age of 24.
	By Mayo Clinic saying he had stage 4 cancer and he was gonna die.
	He is celebrating in October his 50th year being cancer-free using metabolic therapy including Laetrile.
	He actually spoke to the Congress in the 1970s to keep them from outlawing it.
	They wanted to outlaw a nutritional substance that's found in 1200 different foods that's primarily found in the apricot seed.
	That's why we talk about the apricot seed because it's the easiest way to get it.
	And I've got that right here.
	I've got apricot seeds, so tell us a little bit about that.
	When you eat this, you've got to go a little bit slow.
	I couldn't believe it when you said there's that tribe that ate 200 of them a day, because I thought, oh, it looks like almonds, and I popped several of them in my mouth, and it kind of gets, I don't know how to describe it.
	It was a very interesting sensation that you get when you eat that many of them at one time.
	But there's something there for sure.
	Yeah, it's horrible tasting.
	And the thought is that what the bad guys say, what Google says is you're getting cyanide poison when you get these reactions.
	It's absolutely nearly impossible to get cyanide poison unless you drank a bunch of beta-glucosidase at the same time.
	And it's a longer story than we have time for now.
	But I want to tell people that God created vitamins to keep us disease free.
	If we just listen to what he said, and I've repeated this, I'm going to go Genesis 129.
	Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit, you shall have them for food.
	God did not provide us these seeds to poison us.
	That's the lie they want to tell us, David.
	Yeah.
	Amygdalin is broken apart only in the presence of a abnormal cell.
	That's where beta glucosidase is.
	So if you eat a handful of them, you're probably going to give yourself an upset stomach because your body's not used to dealing with it.
	The average American diet gets about one milligram of amygdalin in a day.
	My dad said, Ed Griffin said you need a hundred to 200 milligrams a day.
	Not a whole lot.
	It's only like five or 10 apricot seeds.
	There's 20 milligrams in each apricot seed.
	And David, I eat regularly 40 a day.
	Now, the caveat, I don't recommend that to everybody because if you do that, you're going to get an upset stomach.
	You're not going to get cyanide poisoning.
	That doesn't happen.
	The body has a rhodanase called the protecting enzyme, which breaks the, any free cyanide that's developed if you come in contact with a cancer cell is broken down by rhodanase that turns it into a pain reliever.
	That's why the FDA can't deny that amygdalin causes pain relief.
	But I'm gonna be at the Healing for the Ages conference this weekend with Dr. Brian Artis, Dr. Ed Group, who many people know from Global Healing.
	You play a role.
	I just talked to Dr. Ed group yesterday.
	He used laetrile back in the 1990s and 2000s until he got demonized by the, by the FDA.
	We had to move away from it and started global healing.
	We're working together on a project that I'm not going to announce yet.
	We're working on it to bring this to more people in a way that's, that's, that's not so nasty tasting as the apricot seed because this is the best way to get it.
	It's also the hardest way for people to do because they don't like the taste of it.
	So we're trying to make it, we're gonna grind it up and put it into seed meals so people can put it in their smoothies or their oatmeal.
	But again, I must repeat, I'm not the only one that has it.
	It's not a trademark.
	God has the trademark on it.
	That's the thing that they hate.
	They hate that this little seed can wipe out a $2 trillion industry.
	And so they'll lie, cheat, and steal to stop people from knowing about this.
	And I'm not the only one who has it.
	You can grow it in your own yard, and you can eat foods that have a mignon in it.
	Yeah, and it says there on the label, California grown, tested, pesticide and herbicide free, air dried.
	It looks very much like almonds, and like I said, you know, it's kind of a strong taste.
	I just grabbed a handful of them because I was like, almonds are popping in.
	I was like, take these one or two at a time when you're first doing it.
	It's like, oh, okay, well.
	But I survived, didn't have any problems.
	I didn't even have an upset stomach with it.
	And then I've got this as well, the seed caps.
	Tell us a little bit about the seed caps.
	Seacaps is just our answer.
	It's very simple.
	We squeeze the oil out of it to keep it from going rancid and we grind it up.
	Our seed powder, it has the oil pressed out and that we put it in a capsule.
	So if you don't like the taste, you just take it.
	It gets through your upper colon and goes to work in your stomach.
	So that's just a way to get it separately.
	You can get it as pure Laetrile.
	I have the bottles back here for somebody that wants more potency.
	A hundred milligrams of pure Laetrile.
	500 milligrams, we even offer it in the liquid laetrile, which some people use to add to their IVs, just like vitamin C. Dr. Krebs, who is kind of the proponent of the 60s and 70s, who was getting the word out there, people said, how much should I do if I have some?
	He said, get as much into your system as your immune system can handle.
	So, they did many toxicology studies back then, and even more recent, that amygdalin even though they try to make you fearful of the cyanide thing, and we've talked about that, is safer than sugar.
	And my wife even goes, honey, stop saying that because sugar is poison.
	The number one thing you need to do if you're trying to be healthy is get off sugar, but lay it to a pure amygdalin is safer than sugar and has no, we have many studies and many documentation and it's all available at rncstore.com for people to look up, understand, and read that it's not just John Richardson having some patent or trademark on this item.
	It's available out there in the world and we want to teach people so they can't take that away from us.
	So they can't keep us afraid and going to do, rushing to chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery when we have an issue.
	Well, it's very important.
	It's very important for us to arm ourselves with the truth before something happens.
	You know, it's just in our particular case, you know, you got an emergency infection that is really rapidly building and you're concerned about that.
	We didn't know the history of these, you know, flocks and the family of these drugs and everything like that.
	And it didn't ring a bell.
	And I was sick at the time myself as well.
	And so, you know, they take advantage Of your ignorance is what they do.
	I got a couple of questions here, a comment, a question on Rockfin.
	NN says, my sister worked at UAB and four researchers quietly announced that they had found a possible cure for cancer.
	I don't know what type, but they were shut down.
	Heard that over and over again.
	And I've got this from Brian and Deb McCartney.
	Can you ask him about Dr. Stanislaw Brzezinski and if he knew him?
	Yeah, I do know him.
	I more know of him.
	We're not personal friends, but he's out of Houston.
	I've driven by his clinic.
	I have a good friend that does know him.
	There was actually a study David done at a hospital in Houston that proved that amygdalin helped prevent or treat seven different types of C word.
	Now I'm going to use that in that sentence.
	Because they were also shut down.
	Obama administration shut it down.
	People forget, why would they do that?
	Why would they do that for an answer?
	Because people forget that the entire medical industry is supported by the pharmaceutical industries.
	So at this hospital there was 10 or 20 million dollars worth of drugs being tested through the pipeline.
	Pfizer is buying companies that have come up with a new drug for cancer.
	This is a profit machine.
	So if I, like I said, if there was a study done at a hospital or someplace like Sloan Kettering in the 70s that proved, read the title of this and you can watch this using your night as people's affiliate code.
	You can watch this for free on our website as long as it stays on Rumble because they took it down from Facebook.
	But it showed that it stopped the spread of cancer and they lied to us about it.
	This was in the 1970s.
	If you don't think they're doing that to us now, if people don't think they're doing that to us now, this is the answer that they don't want us to know about.
	And as long as I can keep standing up in my soapbox and preaching this and getting information out there, For such a time as this, people are receptive to it, David, because they've gone through the things that you have, and many of your viewers have gone through the same thing.
	They shut down the natural answers because there's no profit in it.
	The system doesn't sustain itself that way.
	That's why we have to scrap that system, eventually, and go from the point of view of healing the person, not treating their pains or their symptoms, and just masking them, but healing the person.
	That's what we have to go back to.
	Absolutely, and it's time for a paradigm shift.
	natural answers to disease that we need to open up to the world and that should be the first route people take.
	Absolutely yeah it's time for a paradigm shift. I mean how can we look at what has happened the last four years and not understand that.
	But you know I just recently I looked up a supplement NMN and the people that I got it from and I saw that they got shut down during the COVID stuff because they said something that was really pretty innocuous saying you know well this this really does help with the COVID but you have to be very careful about About that.
	If you make a particular statement or claim, they will use that then to shut you down.
	They completely shut those people down.
	I remember when things were happening and people were concerned and said, well, we got this this thing out there.
	And I said, look, you know, SARS and things like this, you know, these are not really novel or new.
	And I read quotes from people who had been one of them was still at either the FDA or the NIH.
	And I said, here's what they're saying.
	They're saying that it builds up your body's defenses.
	It doesn't necessarily kill a particular disease, but it builds up your body's defenses so that you fight it naturally.
	And so I read the quotes from both the NIH and from the FDA for that.
	But if you go out and you say, well, it's going to cure such and such a disease, and that's not really the paradigm.
	Because as you point out, we're not focused on a disease.
	We're not focused on cutting off a bump or cutting off a lump or whatever.
	That's not really the disease.
	The disease is more systematic, and that's why you're approaching it from a nutritional standpoint.
	Absolutely, that's the safest way to approach it for doctors, for health practitioners, for people to understand that we're supporting the immune system.
	We have all over our website that this has never been approved by FDA.
	I'm not a doctor.
	I don't treat patients.
	I'm just a historian that's pushing this message out there and giving people the data they need to make their own decisions.
	And that's what we have to do.
	We can't bury our head in the sand anymore, David.
	We can't just hope someone else is going to protect us.
	There's going to be white knights coming in and rescuing us at the last possible second, even who are voting for president.
	Even though I think there's a clear difference between the two people on face value now, I don't think that's our answer to our future.
	Our answer is for us to be educated, us to learn the truth and get it and spread it amongst our tribe.
	The people that we love the most, the people that follow you, listening to your truth, they know you tell the truth regardless of whether it's best for your financial reasons or not.
	Same thing for me.
	I sell a book on my website, David, that says cancer free with food.
	It actually teaches anybody who buys it how to put me out of business.
	What a crazy thing to do.
	Because if you eat the right foods, you don't need John Richardson.
	You don't need this story.
	If you eat the right foods and take the right nutrients, you can avoid the C word in your lifetime and avoid it for any of your family members.
	It's really just an educational and making the right choices when you're eating.
	The problem is Most of our choices are limited to processed foods at the grocery store, the fast food place, and left to our own devices.
	We're going to eat things that are sugary and salty and taste delicious and have no nutritional value.
	So sometimes eating the right thing tastes horrible, but God told us that's what we need to eat for food, so I recommend people follow what God said.
	That's a really good spiritual analogy as well.
	Sometimes it's bitter taste, but it's what he's got for our best interest.
	And you know, there's been a lot of talk about hyper processed foods and all this other kind of stuff.
	And so a lot of there was an article that just was published in addition to that said, well, you know, a lot of people say, well, I don't want to have junk food or anything.
	So they're eating really good stuff or eating salad and having fat free salad dressings and things that do you realize that colon cancer is going up because this stuff is just loaded with chemicals.
	It's just an imitation of the other stuff that, you know, that that is natural and it just is permeated throughout our food supply.
	You know, the wheat is adulterated from genetic modification, and it's from selective breeding even before the genetic modification, but now they're going to be doing GMO wheat.
	Everything is adulterated like that, so it is really difficult to eat natural and eat really clean.
	Even the people who think they're eating clean are getting some kind of a fake imitation of food.
	You need a supplement, unfortunately, with what food we have available, but some of the guidelines that my beautiful wife has taught me to really follow, even though I've been a person who ate a lot of dairy, she says if you're battling a disease and you want to get healthier and feel better, stay away from dairy, stay away from gluten, and stay away from sugar.
	Those are the three hard things.
	Everybody likes the hot, fresh buns with sugar and cakes and things like that.
	If you can stay away from those three things, besides what I'm talking about, dairy, gluten and sugar, you can avoid a lot of disease.
	Those things have been kind of pushed on us over time because those industries had the most money to spend to get on that food pyramid and so it is a financial thing.
	But our food right now, Is mostly garbage, mostly garbage.
	So we do need a supplement.
	And that's unfortunate, but it's a lot cheaper than the other method to treat after you get it, you know, and try to fight it that way.
	Oh, absolutely.
	Well, I'm real interested to see what's going to come out with a collaboration between you and Dr. Group.
	Tell him I said hi.
	I will.
	Such a nice guy.
	I'll see him this weekend.
	I'll see him with Ryan Artis, Dr. Schmidt from Gold Care.
	They're doing amazing things, David.
	I don't know if you're familiar with what I don't know them, but I do know Dr. Group, and I have the most respect for him.
	He is such a nice guy, very sincere in what he does, and one of the nicest people I've ever met.
	His factory is 10-12 minutes away from me.
	I don't want to tell people exactly where I am.
	He's out in Arizona, too, somewhere.
	No, he has his main office in Houston but his factory is out here in Arizona and we're going to be doing liposomal versions of BD-17 which are absolutely amazing and we're working on it right now.
	It's not like I'm announcing something that's private.
	It's a naturally occurring substance.
	I'm never going to have a trademark to it.
	I don't want a trademark to it.
	I don't want to be the only person, David.
	It protects me with more people that know about it and more people growing in their garden and getting it.
	And when you're talking about liposomal, you're talking about having it bonded essentially to fat so that it's more absorbable into the system.
	Is that correct?
	Throughout the whole body.
	It was invented by the skincare companies spent millions of dollars on it.
	And then Dr. Group has spent the last eight years perfecting it.
	It's been treated nutritionally.
	He said they dropped it in the skincare line because they were taking all these poisons and making it to go all different parts of your body.
	So it wasn't helpful.
	It's only bi-posomal technology is only good if what you're bringing to people is actually good for them.
	So that's what he's developed at Global Healing and we're going to be doing that and I'm excited about it.
	I'm really excited about that.
	Yeah, vitamin, liposomal vitamin C, we've been taking that for a while, and that's, and our family have known about that, so that's great to see that happening with other things.
	The Richardson Nutrition Center, RNC, and it's rncstore.com, is that where people can find things?
	That's right, rncstore.com.
	Remember, don't tell me about how to run the Republican National Committee, I'm not going to help anybody with that, so.
	That's right.
	Richardson Nutritional.
	And he'll give you some special benefits and things to help you if you use the code Knight, and we're going to put up some links on our website to let you know about that.
	But yeah, I'm all about people trying to find alternatives.
	You know, we need to have alternatives to the fiat dollar.
	We need to have alternatives to this.
	Fake, dangerous medical system.
	We've got to have a parallel society.
	That's the only way that we're going to be able to survive this stuff.
	These people are out to destroy everything in our society, as well as our bodies and our souls.
	And so we've got to start educating ourselves and taking advantage of this.
	And you have a wealth of things to educate people about.
	There were publications, an excellent resource source.
	Thank you so much, John, for what you do.
	Again, it's rncstore.com.
	Thank you, John.
	Appreciate it.
	Thank you, David.
	God bless.
	Thank you.
	And thank you all for listening and for joining us today.
	That's it for today's broadcast.
	Have a good day.
	We'll talk to you tomorrow, hopefully.
	Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti-social media?
	It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great escape to TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links.
	Livestream the show at DLive and ____ every Monday through Friday, 9am Eastern.
	Videos at Bitchute and Ugetube.
	New audio podcast, The Real David Knight Show, at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart, ____, and more.
	But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel, without your support, the show will run out of gas.
	The links to support the show are at TheDavidKnightShow.com to donate via Subscribestar, donate via PayPal, or donate via PayPal, Cash App, Bitcoin, or PO Box.
	Our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with us to get this far.

▲