Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 5, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:05:41

The David Knight Show - 09/05/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds minds.
	you You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday the 5th of September.
	Well, today we're going to begin with the shooting, because we know this is going to be used politically, it's a horrific thing, but even more importantly, what's the problem with our society?
	We're going to go back and listen to a survivor from Columbine because that was really a turning point and we really had not had, even though there had been an occasional school shooting, there really wasn't this type of school shooting until a couple of smaller ones two years preceding that.
	So we're going to talk about that.
	We're also going to talk about what is happening With the vaccines and politics, and we have an inquiry in Australia about excess deaths.
	And it is the most rigged, absurd thing you've ever seen.
	While we have embalmers showing these fibrous clots that are building in people's bodies after they take them out.
	These clots continue to grow post-mortem.
	How is that happening?
	We'll be right back.
	We had a shooting yesterday.
	You had another one in Georgia.
	Four dead, nine hospitalized, two teachers, two students killed.
	A 14-year-old is in custody and will be charged with murder and handled as an adult, say the authorities.
	He surrendered when he was confronted by the responding law enforcement officers, so we don't have a situation where there was a dead shooter.
	There'll be an opportunity for them to talk to him, of course, and find out what is going on.
	As a matter of fact, they talked to him a year ago.
	Supposedly, he was reported by the FBI to the local sheriff's department because he was making threats online about shooting up the school.
	And so they went in and talked to him.
	He denied that those were his posts.
	And his father said, yes, we have hunting rifles, but they are under control.
	And so the sheriff said, OK, never mind.
	And the school did nothing about it.
	He used what they say is an AR platform style gun.
	Now, when we look at the Supreme Court decisions that said that the you have to look at the original intention and of course, intention.
	That they came up with, the standard that they came up with, which I don't agree with.
	I don't think that really is what the founders had in mind for the Second Amendment.
	The Second Amendment was about creating a counter-threat to the government.
	To make sure, just like you have mutually assured destruction for nuclear weapons, you don't want to use the nuclear weapons, but you create them as a threat to the other side using them.
	It's like, well, if you do this, It's going to kill us both.
	And that's not guaranteed that you're not going to have a madman on the other side still pull the trigger, but that was the basis of the nuclear deterrent.
	And what the Second Amendment is, is a deterrent.
	A deterrent to a government that would try to take over everything, as we see it happening slowly.
	With our government, and yet what the Supreme Court said was that you are allowed to have anything that is in common use.
	Well, that's fine.
	Under that, it's not fine, but under that standard, you've just recently had a judge say, well, okay, machine guns qualify for that.
	Because they've been around, and they were commonly used, and so forth.
	In the past, they've had standards.
	When you had the sawed-off shotgun in the Miller case in the 1930s, as they were making their first probes into gun control, they said, well, the sawed-off shotgun is not a military weapon, and only military weapons are covered by the Second Amendment.
	Well, that's not true either.
	And neither was it true that it was, you know, it's not just military weapons, of course.
	That is a primary purpose.
	The Supreme Court understood that.
	Now, if you say we should be able to have something if it's a military weapon, they freak out.
	You've had McChrystal and other military retired people say, well, do you realize how fast a bullet goes?
	If it's coming out of a military weapon?
	You know, that kind of nonsense.
	You know, oh, you shouldn't have, civilians shouldn't have military weapons.
	We need to have a standing army and they need to have monopoly on force, that type of thing.
	Well, that is antithetical to the intention of the founders.
	It's antithetical to good sense, but that is not the standard either.
	So it's not whether it's in common use.
	Standard is not whether it's a military weapon or not.
	None of that stuff matters.
	We're given God-given rights to protect ourselves, and that includes even knives.
	And so now people are starting to, some people in some court cases have started to challenge some state prohibitions on knives, depending on how they're, you know, switch blades, or if the blade is a certain length, or this or that.
	People have said, well, that still is a weapon of self-defense, and so that should be covered in the Second Amendment as well.
	But again, that is not the standard.
	It is not self-defense.
	The standard is to be able to protect yourself against government, primarily, I think, but it's a God-given right to be able to defend ourselves as well.
	That's just common sense applied to it.
	So if you look at it as the AR platform, the reason I get into all of this is because they want to focus on it.
	They want to say, no, that's a military weapon needs to be taken away.
	But the AR platform, as I said, it's got that because that is perhaps one of, if not the most common guns out there.
	And so of course they're going to be used over and over again.
	It doesn't mean that they are, as the left likes to portray it, some kind of a super weapon that makes the holder invincible.
	That's the way they like to portray it.
	I mean, we look at these shooting at the Texas church.
	I can't remember what it was.
	Spring was in the name.
	But anyway, that guy who was shooting up the church from the outside with an AR, he was taken down and killed by another guy with an AR.
	Or you have the situation in a mall, where a guy came in, he had the AR.
	Sutherland Springs.
	Sutherland Springs.
	Thank you very much.
	Yes.
	Mark Collins, who has played George Washington many, many times, and I've interviewed him several times, and he actually, he's now, he's a pastor of a church in Yorktown, Texas, and he's got a picture of him where they had like a very detailed, realistic sculpture
	of George Washington, and on one side of the picture is that sculpture of George Washington, and on the other side is Mark Collins, and they are spitting images of each other.
	It's amazing.
	But he goes around, he dresses up as George Washington, and he tells kids in classrooms about Washington, about the founding of this country, and he's got it right.
	He's also played George Washington in a number of movies and things like that.
	I mean, it's pretty amazing how he looks.
	Anyway, he used to be the pastor at Sutherland Springs, and he contacted me.
	And the day after, that happened on a Sunday, and I had him that Monday morning, and he said, you know, I used to be the pastor of that church.
	I know the guy who is the pastor whose daughter was killed.
	And he said, it's being reported by the media that this guy was stopped With a defender who heard the shooting and came running, stopped to the guy who had a shotgun.
	He said, no, that's not right.
	He had an AR and he was actually an NRA instructor as well.
	So they will always try to make the AR into some kind of a super weapon that's got to be banned.
	But you also had the situation in a mall where a guy comes in, he's got a, an AR pistols and magazines.
	I forget all the stuff they came in.
	We had several different things.
	He just started shooting at random at people.
	And there was a guy who was carrying concealed and defiance of the store prohibitions.
	And he pulled out his gun and he ran over and leaned against a post there in the shopping center.
	And he took him out with a pistol.
	I mean, this is the reality.
	But that's not what is going to be sold to you by Lala and the Democrats and the gun controllers.
	So they're going to focus on the AR platform.
	We've got to do something about that.
	But here's the other thing.
	No teachers were armed.
	Where was school security?
	And as I said before, he was a known threat.
	And they just went with it.
	They said, well, you know, keep an eye on him.
	I guess the school security was not doing it.
	There was actually three officers whose job it was to protect the school.
	No word about what they did.
	We really don't know.
	The nine people in the hospital are expected to survive, but four people died.
	So this is going to be used for political capital.
	Lala here said, as she was giving a speech yesterday, I'm going to go off script here.
	She's also going to go off the constitutional oath that she took as well.
	It's senseless.
	We've got to stop it.
	We have to end this epidemic of gun violence in our country once and for all.
	Okay, well, you know, tell us what the problem is.
	Do you know what the problem is?
	No, she just wants to use that to come after the Second Amendment and our God-given rights.
	I say that we keep the Second Amendment, and maybe what we do is to get rid of the government schools.
	Or at the very least, we tell teachers, you need to be able to defend yourself.
	Lala's not going to come defend you.
	Neither is Biden or Trump.
	None of them are going to defend you.
	That's something we're going to talk about later today.
	I'm seeing this over and over again.
	The country is lost if we don't have Trump.
	Or on the left, La La, right?
	And this is escalating every election now.
	I'm going to leave the country if this doesn't go the way that I want.
	Or I'm going to have a revolution or whatever.
	Look, we need to take personal responsibility for our lives.
	And we need to take responsibility for our children.
	Keep them at home and teach them because there's far more dangerous things than being shot at or even killed that are going on in the schools all the time.
	You've got dangerous people up in front of the classroom in many, many cases, teaching your kids, and destroying, at war against their soul, their very soul, their eternal soul.
	That's what they're doing in the schools.
	Don't fear the people who can destroy the body.
	Fear those who can destroy the soul.
	And that's the school institution.
	Yeah, we need to tell the teachers if they're going to do this, that they need to take some personal responsibility for their lives.
	That's not something we talk about in America anymore.
	Personal responsibility, is it?
	We're not talking about being a hero, right?
	Heroes run into burning buildings.
	But people who are defending themselves and taking responsibility to defend their own lives, that's a very different situation.
	And a very different dynamic.
	And people will do that.
	If you have the means of defense, you will.
	But sometimes, in many of these cases, we have a brave teacher who charges the shooter and gets killed.
	That might buy some time for somebody else to escape.
	But why just use your body as a shield?
	Why not train yourself to be able to fight back?
	Why not even the odds?
	And that's what guns do.
	Guns even the odds based on how much you train with it.
	Of course, anybody can be shot from behind and that type of thing, but still, if you have a situation that evens the odds, especially for women, for elderly people, it gives them a chance which they otherwise would not have.
	You know, it doesn't have to be this way, she said.
	It doesn't have to be this way.
	I traveled our country meeting with our young leaders, said Lala.
	So it was college-aged young leaders, trade schools, colleges, universities, she said.
	And I'll tell you one of the things I asked them every time I went into the auditorium, it would be filled with these young leaders, students.
	And I would ask them, raise your hand if at any point between kindergarten and 12th grade, you had to endure an active shooter drill.
	And she said, nearly every hand went up.
	Well, see, it's because she's asking young people.
	And because this is something that happened in the late 90s.
	Why did this start in the late 90s?
	Because if you ask somebody who's older, they don't even have to be as old as I am.
	I'm getting pretty old.
	But they don't even have to be as old as me to remember when they would go to school and there was no concern about a shooting event.
	There was no fear at all of that.
	It was unknown.
	And yet what was known was people, and RFK Jr.
	has talked about this as well, even up in the Northeast.
	I grew up in the South.
	He grew up in the Northeast.
	And I thought it was just a Southern thing that people would drive around with rifle racks and actual rifles in their rifle racks and the pickup trucks.
	But he said that happened up there where he was as well.
	People would bring their guns to school to train for ROTC or the Rifle Club or whatever.
	There were no mass shootings.
	So what's changed?
	Guns were actually far more common than they are today.
	And there were no shootings.
	So it's not the guns.
	And if you're going to do something about it, that isn't going to solve the problem.
	So when did all this stuff start?
	Well, Columbine was 1999.
	And prior to that, we'd really, you know, occasionally there'd be some kind of a fight or something.
	Somebody, you know, would happen to be at school.
	Um, you know, they might've had a shot or something like that, but it was extreme.
	It was really, you know, I hate to use the term rare.
	It's been so overused by Fauci in the false way.
	It was rare, you know, while this early was rare.
	Uh, in 1997, there were two shootings like this.
	In 1998, there were two shootings.
	And then in 1999, you had Columbine that captured the imagination of the country.
	It was highly publicized.
	Why did that happen?
	Was it the SSRIs?
	Was it society in general?
	Video games?
	What was it?
	What caused this type of thing?
	Well, certainly SSRIs had just recently come on the scene, as had the Ask Your Doctor commercials pushing all of this stuff.
	And they started questioning the effects of SSRIs on young people in the very early 2000s, right after this Columbine thing.
	There absolutely is a connection with that.
	And when we talk about SSRI stories, I can never remember if it's .net, .com, .org, but SSRI stories has over 7,000 stories like this.
	Stories like a young person who had adjusted their dosage and it made him go crazy because they're having other issues with the SSRIs.
	He's having other physical issues with him.
	Pain.
	They're burning or something.
	So I was like, I'm not going to take that stuff.
	And you just stop at cold turkey after you've been taking it.
	And then all of a sudden you don't know what you're doing.
	You have this psychotic event.
	Like a young guy who goes to his school with a rifle and he goes into the classroom and everybody backs off and he Stands in front of the classroom.
	He points the rifle at the class.
	Then he points it at himself.
	Then he points it at the class.
	Then he points it at him.
	And they were able to get that away from him before he shot himself in the class.
	And after he recovered in the hospital from SSRIs, he didn't remember any of that.
	And so, it absolutely is a factor.
	And they will absolutely never talk about that.
	But there's other issues as well.
	And so, you know, when you look at what SSRIs are now, you know, they're just coming on the scene at that point in time.
	Now, it is the 22nd most common prescription drug, SSRIs, given for all kinds of things.
	You having trouble sleeping?
	Here, have some murder-suicide pills.
	But then we see things like this.
	Food dyes linked to neurobehavioral problems may be banned from California schools.
	They would like for you to follow that red herring, but don't follow that.
	Yeah, they are absolutely unhealthy, no doubt about it.
	But we're not talking about something that's at the level of the SSRIs at all.
	You know, definitely get unhealthy stuff out.
	And then we just had the Tennessee Star.
	They'll show you one poison, but not the other poison.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Yeah, look at this over here.
	Pay attention to this.
	And so California is focusing on that.
	And the Tennessee Star.
	Has been focused on getting this killer, this trainee killer, Audrey Hale, who shot up the school, killed a couple of nine-year-olds and some teachers there and left a manifesto.
	And the question has always been, so why is the FBI so intent and, you know, the liberal government there in Nashville, why are they so intent in keeping this secret?
	And, you know, it is all of this stuff.
	about people being bullied and all the rest of it.
	This all goes back to Columbine as well.
	This is the excuse that they came up with.
	In that particular situation, you had a couple guys who were dressing up as goths, but now people are dressing up as the opposite sex and saying, you bully me!
	This is what's going to happen.
	But let's take a look at the true horror of Columbine.
	This is a young man who was one of the students there.
	His sister was killed.
	He survived.
	And he has been going around, he's a Christian, he's been going around talking to people about this event for a very long time.
	And also talking to them about forgiveness.
	How do you get over something like that?
	And so he's being interviewed by Billy Hallwell.
	Yeah, I mean, you mentioned your friend who died next to you.
	You were in the library.
	You saw and experienced some of the most horrific things imaginable, particularly for a teenager, a kid at the time.
	It was horrific for the entire country.
	You went through it.
	Coming out of that, When it comes to forgiveness, right, we talk a lot about forgiveness in our culture, maybe not enough, but the word gets thrown around a lot.
	But you really have had to deal with that.
	How did you get to a place of forgiveness?
	What was that journey like for you coming out of a situation where 12 kids, a teacher killed by their peers?
	It's just horrific.
	Yeah, a lot of times, you know, just a recap a little bit about what I went through.
	I was in the library, which was the scene of the most intense shooting.
	I watched as the shooters went around the room taunting students and treated it like it was a game.
	They came over to where I was.
	I saw my friend Isaiah.
	They called him racial slurs.
	They tried to pull him out from underneath the table.
	They killed him.
	Then they killed my friend Matt.
	And they left me underneath that table.
	I thought I was gonna die.
	And I felt that I heard God speak to me.
	And I am careful even with that phrase.
	God told me to do something because I know that my own thinking can get in the way of that still small voice that's within.
	But I felt very strongly and impressed that a voice that was all-knowing, wise, and told me to get out of there.
	I was the first student to stand up, looked around the room.
	I saw the shooters were gone.
	And I yelled at everyone, let's get out of here.
	A group of us ran out.
	There's a police car outside.
	We all got behind the police car and shortly after the shooters came back into the library and began to exchange gunfire with the police.
	Behind the police car, I was holding a girl who had been shot.
	Her name was Val Schnur and she had a conversation with the shooters just minutes earlier where they were One of them walked by her and she said, Oh, God, and it caught his attention.
	He said, God, you believe in God?
	And had this conversation between the two of them where she was begging for her life.
	And and finally, she said she did.
	She said yes.
	And then I heard a shotgun and but she survived.
	And I'm and I'm holding her behind this police car, trying not to let her go to sleep.
	It's amazing what kicks in.
	You know, you think We're more resilient than we realize sometimes.
	Things automatically kick in that you don't even know.
	I mean, I'm 16 years old, just turned 16, and all I knew all of a sudden, it just came to me, you don't let someone who's losing blood go to sleep.
	Also, I'm in total shock, which is your brain's way of kind of protecting you from the gravity of what you're dealing with.
	So you're in total shock.
	It feels surreal.
	When I was in the library, I was completely paralyzed with fear.
	It was less than ten minutes, but it felt like hours that I was in there.
	Because those seconds just are so long and you're totally aware of every, you're just in this very crazy, crazy place.
	What I've learned about, you know, these ask about forgiveness is, you know, a lot of times we don't realize we need forgiveness.
	Like we're angry about something.
	We don't know sometimes what it is we're carrying around.
	Some, some stuff from our past and our anger for, and I didn't realize it, but for years I was, I was for years I was angry and I hated the shooters.
	I mean, I would – the reason I hated them is because the news got the overall reason wrong why the shooting happened, not because they were intentionally trying to, but everybody wanted to know why.
	The story came out that's just not true.
	The story is these guys were pushed to the edge with being bullied at school so bad that they got revenge.
	And that was the overall story that came out from Columbine.
	Even the psychologists and everybody in the community, everyone that's learned about Columbine realizes that's not what happened.
	That had to be frustrating, you know, to continue to hear that even now that still comes up, right?
	You know, as the primary reason a lot of people go back to that media narrative and that's all they really know of the reasons.
	Yeah, so that's a false narrative, and it's not the reason why Columbine happened.
	It's a minor, smaller factor.
	It's a factor, but it's a smaller factor.
	And in fact, that caused, in the mind of the American psyche, a bad formula that's existed for 25 years.
	And we, as a country, need to get rid of that formula.
	And the formula is, oh, you've been bullied at school?
	Look out.
	You could do a school shooting.
	Well, that is so wrong because that's that's the equivalent of you stepped on my toe.
	I'm going to cut off your limbs.
	Yeah, and that is something that we've seen from this tranny shooter in Nashville.
	This is again comes up.
	Well, you know, she was bullied, I'm sure, because all trannies are bullied, that type of thing.
	And by the way, I correct I need to correct what I said before.
	It was three nine year olds that were killed by her at point blank.
	And three adult staff members before she was shot by the police department who got there very quickly.
	Uh, good for them.
	And, um, but, um, that was a narrative surfaced.
	And I think that that is the reason I bring all this stuff up.
	And because I go back to this is because we really do need to look at the reasons why this is happening.
	It's not because of AR 15 or whatever it is that they want to focus on.
	And certainly, you know, as he said, bullying can be a factor.
	I think a big factor is the SSRIs, but none of this explains it a hundred percent.
	Some of these things are used to excuse it.
	Some of these things are co-opted for their own agendas.
	But I think that this played a big part in why the FBI and the liberal government there in Nashville, there were people in the police department who were leaking this to the Tennessee Star, a conservative paper.
	Uh, that was putting some of that stuff out.
	And so there was a fight between the local liberal government there of Nashville, a liberal judge and the FBI wanting to keep this quiet because I think they wanted to put this out and have people, uh, feed this killer into this narrative that she was a victim, you know, like the, the two guys at Columbine were victims of being bullied between June the 5th and September the 3rd, the Tennessee star published approximately 50 articles based on the covenant killers, 2023 journal.
	But do not contain the actual pages from that journal.
	Tuesday's publication of the Covenant Killers 2023 journal provides further evidence supporting those 50 articles.
	It also reveals some new information, including the octagonal symbol that Hale drew when writing about her planned attack at the Covenant School, or her gender identity.
	Scroll down, you can see that.
	She draws that everywhere, but I don't know the significance.
	of that.
	She was 28 years old, a biological female who claimed that she was male.
	And she had some very strange and interesting perspective on this.
	Very weird.
	But it does give us an insight.
	She expressed sexual fantasies with stuffed animals.
	She said, I'm such a pervert.
	I waste too much time in my fantasies.
	Though the journal offers scant evidence of a political ideology or motive, she wrote a political rant in an entry dated one month prior.
	She complained about the U.S.
	failing to respect the rights of disabled people, gun owners, and transgender people.
	She said, so now because of you I wish death on myself because of the pure hatred of my female gender.
	With no rights, anyone's country is a dictatorship, she wrote in her diary.
	She also My parents, my effing parents, think of themselves first and their preference of conservative religion make them believe that the child they are given should stay that way.
	Make them go to youth group and force Christian friends in their life because the old ones were a bad influence.
	Parents actually believe religion can change nature.
	That could explain why I don't practice religion anymore.
	Let kids think for themselves, she wrote.
	And yet, as the Tennessee Star points out, her suicidal tendencies rested on the belief that she would go to heaven and get a male body and maybe 72 virgins.
	I don't know.
	She's coming up with this theology.
	You know, quite frankly, she just invented her own religion.
	I don't want a free golden start to an opportuned new life.
	That's the way she wrote it.
	I just want another life beyond this realm.
	She hoped that after she died, her male spirit would escape her female body as a butterfly leaves its cocoon.
	Which she referred to as a cacoon, the way she wrote it.
	Again, the grammar, the spelling is... Somehow she missed a lot of things.
	At school, at Sunday school, a lot of other things.
	The cocoon of my own self will die when I leave my body behind and the boy in me will be free in my butterfly transformation.
	You see, the problem with her is she has an obsession with sexual fantasies.
	In her diary, she says it's all she thinks about.
	She's completely enslaved to it.
	She is a lover of self, and she hates everybody else.
	But it is this obsession that enslaved her.
	So, she goes on to say, if God won't give me a boy body in heaven, then Jesus is a faggot, she said.
	And she goes on to say, my faith is weak.
	What does she have faith in?
	What does she have faith in?
	While expressing hope that she'll be in a better place after her rampage, she said, God, forgive me.
	Based on what?
	Now this commentary, this commentary from the Daily Signal says our faith appears to be based on a form of Gnosticism, an ancient Christian heresy.
	No it's not.
	It was not something dreamed up by Christians.
	It was something that was embraced by some Christians, but it was a pagan Greek idea, from a Greek philosopher, that everything in the world is contaminated, and so you need to be pure, you need to reject everything that is physical in the world, and that's not Christianity.
	Some Christians were fooled into that early on, but it was based on a Greek philosophy.
	A Greek philosopher who came up with that.
	But nevertheless, it is built on the idea that the physical world is bad, and the spiritual world is good, and you need to eradicate everything that's physical.
	No, no.
	God is going to redeem the physical.
	A good example of it is, you go back and look at Randy Alcorn's book about heaven, and he talks about that.
	He says, yeah, God is going to fix what we broke.
	And part of it is restoring our relationship with Christ.
	But he's also going to fix the world.
	Physical world is not bad.
	It's the cursed physical world as a result of our rebellion.
	But no, she was a lover of herself.
	She was a slave to her lust.
	She was obsessed.
	She was possessed.
	And so then, what is the reason for this kind of stuff?
	Is it because these poor people are victims?
	Victims of their environment?
	Victims of society?
	Victims of the heterosexual norm?
	Is that why this kind of stuff is happening?
	Well, this is much shorter.
	He talked about the reason why.
	And again, here is a young man who survived Columbine about 25 years ago.
	And so you ask, well, why did Columbine happen?
	I don't have all the reasons.
	I can't tell you everything, but I have learned a lot.
	And I can tell you that after everything I've learned, as far as people are concerned, the biggest people responsible are the two shooters.
	It's not the school.
	It's not people that maybe treated them bad.
	It's not their parents.
	It's not the medication they were on.
	It's not the guns that they got.
	It's the choices that they made in their heart.
	To just to get into a dark place, to choose to kill and choices that they made to lie, to not do the things that they are going to say they're going to do, to all kinds of things.
	So, you know, even as a teenager, when I watched them on the news, I remember, and they were older than me, they were a couple years older than me, and I thought, They knew what they were doing.
	They were planning on it.
	They planned it.
	Eric specifically planned it for over a year.
	So, very sick and twisted, dwelling on the darkest thoughts that you could have, having these dark fantasies of being in power and showing the world your anger and your rage and just this very egotistical, very arrogant fantasy.
	And that Eric had, and then there were two different kids and I've learned a lot about, and I say kids, one was 17, one was 18.
	Um, but they just like other shooters of shootings, they, they knew what they were doing was, was, was, was so wrong.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Just like the Nashville shooter.
	They'd planned it for a very long time.
	Had dark fantasies.
	You know, the difference is, as I said, many times before, you know, we have, um, We have lust, greed, the pride of life.
	You know, the pride of life, that's the power, that's what they were into.
	Yeah, everybody's gonna fear us.
	Politicians get into that.
	The money, so many people are drawn into it based on money, or in the case of this shooter in Nashville, it was sex.
	Sex, money, power.
	And these are the dark fantasies that drive us to this kind of stuff.
	More often, for most people, than actually is money.
	The love of money, the root of all evil, said Jesus.
	Well, so how do you get forgiveness, right?
	He narrows it down.
	He says, no, it's not their parents.
	It's not society.
	It's not drugs.
	It's none of this stuff.
	They are the ones to blame for this.
	You know, we can look at other things as contributing factors and things that have harmed other people.
	But in this particular case, you know, they were not under some SSRI fog.
	He said it was them.
	And so what do you do with that?
	Here's a short clip where he talks about forgiveness.
	So, but back to the issue of forgiveness.
	Forgiveness is like setting a prisoner free and finding out that prisoner is you.
	So you have all this anger and you realize forgiveness is what sets you free from that.
	Forgiveness is a spiritual issue and people a lot of times misunderstand it.
	They think that forgiveness is saying, oh, it's okay what you did.
	Now sometimes that it is when you're meant to be in relation and connection with somebody, you forgive them and you forget what they did and you say it's okay and you give them grace, you give them mercy.
	But sometimes something happens from someone and it's not okay.
	It's completely wrong and evil or whatever you want to call it.
	And at that point, it's not about saying it's okay.
	It's saying, I'm going to choose to let go, and it's for your sake.
	Forgiveness, most of the time, is for you.
	It's for you.
	That's the essence of it.
	Forgiveness is a freeing thing, and people don't realize.
	What happens is you go, well, I have a right to be angry.
	Yes, you do.
	It's for some things that have happened.
	You can either hold on to that right and it let it eat you inside and it then comes out in different ways usually on people that you don't intend it to go out onto or onto yourself or you are living in torment in your mental health.
	Or you have an attitude of forgiveness and choose to let go.
	So I forgave the shooters at Columbine, but I would not pardon them.
	Pardon is a different, is an issue of the law.
	If they had not killed themselves that day, I would have, I would, I believe that they belonged in prison so that they couldn't do that again until Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	And so, you know, when we look at this, this is something that really affects all of us.
	Pretty much all of us were affected negatively in 2020, one way or the other, by Trump, by Biden, by public health officials, by Fauci, by many others.
	What is the appropriate response?
	Is it just say, okay, never mind, I don't care.
	I'm going to vote for this guy again.
	As a matter of fact, he's going to save the world if he gets To be president a second time, or whatever.
	Do we just give them a pass and say it doesn't matter?
	No, it does matter.
	We don't pardon them and we don't put them in a position of power after they have done this type of thing, but we don't hold any personal animosity against them.
	They're not living in our head, which is what I'm always accused of when I criticized.
	Oh, is Trump still living in your head?
	Is he?
	I said, no, he's going to run again.
	I said that in 2020.
	I said, I'm talking about Trump because he's not done.
	Don't you realize he's not done?
	He's going to come back and he's going to, you know, he's a very dangerous person because he's not coming at you straight on.
	You know, there's two kinds of dangers.
	You know, one of them is somebody comes straight on at you.
	They're flying their flag.
	You know that they've got intent to harm.
	And you're warned about that.
	And then there's another one where the person sneaks up on you from behind and sucker punches you or shoots you in the back or stabs you in the back or stabs you in the arm or whatever.
	That is much more dangerous.
	And I've used the analogy many times.
	The difference between a soldier flying their flag and a spy.
	The spies are treated more harshly for that reason.
	But, so why do authorities, getting back to Audrey, why do authorities seem so intent on hiding the journals nearly 18 months after the shooting?
	Do they fear that Hale's religious approach to gender identity might undermine the appeal of gender ideology in American society?
	Well, of course, and they want to keep this narrative going, which goes all the way back to Columbine.
	These poor people are victims.
	They are bullied and so forth.
	Audrey is not a victim.
	She's not a victim.
	She made those decisions.
	She decided to turn herself over fully to her lust for sex, just as these shooters at Columbine turn themselves over fully for the lust of power.
	And so we have to see this clearly.
	And we're not going to be able to do that unless we look at it spiritually.
	And so Free Thought Project has an article that was written by John Whitehead at the Rutherford Institute.
	What does it mean to go back to school in the American police state?
	Again, I grew up at a time where the schools were very, very different than they are now.
	I hated them for different reasons.
	I hated them because it was a confining, mind-numbing, time-wasting experience.
	But now, there's shootings in spite of the metal detectors and the prison environment that's there.
	There's sexual perversion, there's gender gaslighting, there's all this kind of stuff that's happening.
	And Don Whitehead says every day, well actually quotes investigative journalist Annette Fuentes, who says, every day in communities across the U.S.
	children and adolescents spend the majority of their waking hours in schools that have increasingly come to resemble places of detention more than places of learning.
	And it is by design.
	I said this when they first started it back in the 90s.
	I said they're conditioning kids to live in a police state with lockdowns.
	We never had lockdowns.
	We never had metal detectors.
	We never had police in the schools.
	And we never had shootings either.
	But they're conditioning people for fear, uncertainty, doubt.
	They're conditioning people to passively trust the government for protection.
	And the government doesn't do that.
	Training them to be locked down.
	As a matter of fact, I was just talking to Pastor Jeff Weiss, who I talked to on a podcast.
	I've been a guest on a podcast that he does with Trent Luce, and he said, you know, our parents' generation abdicated so much stuff.
	So much stuff that they were responsible for, they abdicated to other people.
	I thought that was a great description.
	of what happened in our parents' generation.
	And a lot of that was based on a misplaced trust in government, I believe, because of World War II.
	Everybody rallied around the government and government became this larger-than-life thing.
	And they trusted it, they abdicated, they, you know, turned over a lot of their parental responsibilities to the government and things like that.
	John Whitehead goes on to say, out on the streets, you've got the menace posed by police officers who shoot first and ask questions later.
	In your neighborhoods, you've got to worry about the nanny state and its network of busybodies turning parents in for allowing their kids to walk to school alone, or walk to the park alone, or play at the beach alone, or even play in their own yard alone, and every one of those He's got a link to a case where they came after the parents for doing that.
	Kids are walking to school, walking to the park, playing at the beach, playing in their own yard.
	They come after the parents.
	The tentacles of the police state even intrude into the sanctity of one's home with the government believing it knows better than you, the parent, what is best for your child.
	In recent years, from parents being arrested for attempting to walk their kids home from school, to parents being fined and threatened with jail time for their kids' bad behavior, links for all of that, or for tardiness at school.
	You know, when you look at the oppressive nature of this, the comprehensive nature of the oppression, do you see God's hand in allowing homeschool?
	Well, I saw it in the early nineties.
	I looked at it, and as a libertarian I had been seeing how encroaching government in every aspect of our life was just growing like a cancer.
	And then I saw homeschooling and I thought, wow, how is that?
	How is it in this one area, the government's grip is loosening up?
	Why are we having freedom in this one area?
	Even when, in North Carolina, the ruling Democrats and the teachers union wanted to strangle it in its infancy, and they failed.
	How's that happening?
	Well, I think it is a clearer sign of God's involvement than Trump's earshot, which I'm still not too sure about, quite frankly.
	But I am sure about what's going on with homeschooling.
	God has given you an opportunity.
	If you're a parent.
	He's given you an opening.
	He's given you the freedom to train your kids and the way they should go.
	Will you take it?
	Will you take that gift from him?
	He says, public schools where parents have little or no control over whether kids are taught, how they're taught, how they are disciplined, the extent to which they're being indoctrinated, and they're all marching in lockstep with the government's authoritarian playbook, the message is chillingly clear.
	Your children are not your own, but are in fact wards of the state who have just been temporarily entrusted to your care.
	It was 11 years ago There was a public service announcement on MSNBC by Melissa Harris Perry saying precisely that, eleven years ago, saying that.
	And they're now been implementing it quite a bit.
	We have never invested as much in public education as we should have because we've always had kind of a private notion of children.
	Your kid is yours and totally your responsibility.
	We haven't had a very collective notion of these are our children.
	So part of it is we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families and recognize that kids belong to whole communities.
	Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the households, then we start making better investments.
	Yeah, when it's everybody's responsibility, it's nobody's responsibility.
	When everything belongs to everybody, guess what?
	It doesn't belong to anybody.
	Just take a look at what happens to the common areas.
	Take a look at what happens to communism.
	Now, that was 11 years ago.
	15 years ago, I answered this before she ever did a public service announcement.
	Certain truths are self-evident.
	We're endowed by our Creator with rights.
	Certain relationships are also inalienable.
	Family was the first institution created by our Creator and the family is the fundamental building block of every healthy society and every just government.
	But government and family are two different authorities or spheres with different roles and different responsibilities.
	Each authority is uniquely suited for a particular task and doesn't do the task of the other well.
	Families have traditionally been assumed to be acting out of love and the best interest of its members, and have been left alone unless proven to be abusive.
	But a new attitude has been cultivated by those that believe children should be raised by the village, and not by their family.
	This approach to children and their families has been spelled out in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
	The UN Convention assumes government responsibility for all the needs of children and transfers responsibilities and rights from parents to government.
	Government is seen as capable of providing every want of the child and as responsible for instilling correct values, their values, into children.
	Parents are mentioned in the UN Convention only as problems for children to be protected from, or as mere advisors to their children, so long as their advice is not too strong or coercive.
	Children are encouraged to form their values independent of their parents.
	But nowhere is there a sense that they would ever need protection from a government.
	This troubling document has been ratified as a treaty throughout the world, with the U.S.
	as virtually the only lone holdout.
	The U.N.
	Convention on the Rights of the Child is about 16 pages.
	On the other hand, the Parental Rights Amendment is only three short paragraphs.
	is a simple restatement of what has until recently been what every culture, every government except authoritarian governments, saw as the rights of parents.
	The Parental Rights Amendment would strengthen the Constitution to protect the family by explicitly stating self-evident truths about an inalienable relationship.
	Find out what you can do at parentalrights.org.
	Yeah, I did that 15 years ago. Instead of being taught the three R's of education, reading, writing, arithmetic, young people are being drilled in the three L's of life, or three I's rather, indoctrination, intimidation, and intolerance.
	And so, John Whitehead says, in the moment a child enters one of the nation's 98,000 public schools, the amount of money that we're spending on this is astronomical.
	Until the moment he or she graduates, they'll be exposed to a steady diet of draconian, zero-tolerance policies that criminalize childish behavior, overreaching anti-bullying statutes that criminalize speech, again, thanks to the narrative created about Columbine, school resource officers The police tasked with disciplining and or arresting disorderly students.
	Standardized testing that emphasizes rote answers over critical thinking.
	Politically correct mindsets that teach young people to censor themselves and those around them.
	By the way, I don't call that politically correct anymore.
	It is Marxist struggle sessions.
	That's what that is about.
	And extensive biometric and surveillance systems, coupled with rest, acclimate young people to a world in which they have no freedom of thought, no freedom of speech, and no freedom of movement.
	This is how you groom young people to march in lockstep with the police state.
	So you want to stop the police state?
	End the government indoctrination.
	You want to own your home?
	Ever?
	Well, then you end the wasteful spending of these 98,000 indoctrination camps that are a threat to the freedom and dignity.
	I'll never forget.
	My introduction to B.F.
	Skinner was when Karen was getting her master's degree in education.
	And I saw that.
	Beyond freedom and dignity.
	I said, well, it's about time somebody complained about the schools.
	This is humiliating, confining nonsense.
	And she said, no, no, no, that's not the thesis of this at all.
	It's exactly the opposite.
	He is saying that we need to take away freedom and dignity, that freedom and dignity is not inherent to human beings.
	Because he's a hardcore atheist, rejected the idea that we're created in the image of God.
	And when you do that, That leads you to doing the kinds of things that are being done today.
	We'll take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidNightShow.com And again you can find the links on where you can find the program as well as how you can support us if you go to TheDavidNightShow.com
	I really do appreciate your support.
	It is very necessary.
	We are supported by voluntary contributions from you.
	As a matter of fact, we're going to talk today.
	I have more important things to say.
	First, I want to talk about the school thing.
	I want to talk about coming up now.
	I want to talk about some pharmaceutical news, but I'm going to get into what I call griftergate.
	Um, just my term, but we have this, uh, all these conservative influencers like Tim pool and Dave Rubin and everything, the contracts that they negotiated with this organization.
	And they didn't know that they were doing it with an organization that was using Russian money.
	And, uh, and we'll, we'll talk about what was happening with it, but the amounts of money, that's the real scandal, I think.
	Because, again, there wasn't really, you know, they were not listed as co-conspirators or Russian agents.
	That's kind of a smear that's been put out there by some in the mainstream media.
	Of course, the conservative alternative media, mainstream alternative media, as David Icke calls it, the MAMs, instead of the mainstream media, but the mainstream alternative media It's completely ignoring this!
	Just like the mainstream media is completely ignoring the Chinese agent that was trying to influence, and did influence, the New York governors.
	But as I point out, what was there was really not of any substance.
	And this really had not happened, nothing of any substance had happened with this either.
	But the amount of money was scandalous.
	And of course, if you get somebody accustomed, you don't ever, at the beginning of something like that, you don't have a quid pro quo.
	Just like the government doesn't come out and say, well, I'm going to give you this massive amount of millions or tens of millions or hundreds of millions of dollars for your school systems.
	And then they don't come in with the strings.
	Instead, what they do is they give you that money for a few years.
	And after that has become a part of something that you depend on, right?
	Yeah, because the money coming in is always just, it's like your garage.
	No matter how big your garage is, the junk will always expand to fill the available space, right?
	And so no matter how big your budget is, the junk will always come in to fill it up, right?
	That's just the way it is.
	And so once the junk has come in and you are completely using all that income, it's not something that's new and it's not considered to be excess anymore, that's now your new normal.
	If it's a big chunk of income at that point, at some point in the future, they could have come in and used that to get these guys to do what they want.
	Now, none of that had happened yet.
	Would it have happened?
	We just have to speculate about that one way or the other.
	We don't know.
	But to me, that was a scandal, was the amount of money.
	We're not getting, when we do the podcast, $100,000 an episode like Tim Pool, or $400,000 an episode like Benny Johnson was offered by just this one company.
	Of course, they had other income streams as well out there.
	Just mind-boggling to see that.
	But we don't need that.
	Uh, we need a lot less and, uh, you know, it's, uh, of course I think Travis could do better if he did a podcast on his own talking about video games and, uh, what I can do helping him here.
	I'm too unhinged.
	I'd go off the rails.
	You get canceled even, even at a video game thing on YouTube.
	Yeah.
	That's the other thing.
	These guys are, you know, they have no problem with YouTube.
	Does that seem suspicious?
	What are they talking about then?
	YouTube wants to censor everything of any value that's talked about.
	Even if you say 2020 was the year the world became China, that's it, you're gone.
	So, anyway, we'll talk about that coming up, but we do appreciate your support.
	We don't need $100,000 per episode.
	To survive.
	The wisdom is, as it says in the Bible, don't make me poor, don't make me rich.
	God, keep me somewhere in the middle.
	Don't lose my mind.
	Either one of those extremes can be a severe test for us.
	I don't think I could handle being rich.
	I'd do something insane.
	I'd diamond-encrust a peacock or something like that.
	See, that's the thing.
	You know, when you look at people who have a lot of money, well, they do.
	They go out and spend it on Rolexes and, you know, just what they have on... I'll just say this briefly.
	Go back and look at how much Alex Jones needs to live every month.
	I mean, it's a public record now in the court filings.
	It's like, what?
	But of course, you know, he's making that kind of money as well.
	So yeah, don't get yourself in that kind of trap, and God has protected us from that.
	He's protected us from getting rich.
	But we really do appreciate your support, and so if you'd like to support us, SubscribeStar is one of the great ways to do that.
	And we really do appreciate that, even though we don't mention the people by name, because there's over 300 that support us on Subscribestar, so we don't read out the names on a regular basis, but we really do appreciate that.
	Even at the lowest level, that's more than we would make on our ads.
	If you watched every one of the ads and every episode for a month, it wouldn't be close to a dollar that we'd make.
	So, you know, five dollars, that's great.
	We really do appreciate that.
	A Florida doctor removed the wrong organ from a patient, resulting in immediate catastrophic death.
	See, this is the state of medicine right now.
	Ignorant, mercenary, greedy.
	And William Bryan of Alabama was visiting the Florida Panhandle last month when he suddenly began experiencing lower left abdominal pain.
	He and his wife Beverly went to the Ascension Sacred Heart Emerald Coast Hospital.
	Between Pensacola and Panama City, doctors were concerned about an abnormality in his spleen.
	They admitted him for further testing, said the family's lawyer.
	They told him that if he left the hospital, he could face serious complications.
	If he stayed in the hospital, he could get even more serious complications.
	But that's the way they always work, right?
	You've got this pain or this, uh, whatever it is situation.
	That's the bad cop.
	And they use the fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
	And then they bring in the guys with the white coats and the expensive equipment.
	And they're the good cop.
	They're going to fix everything for you.
	Well, in this particular case, uh, there was a hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy.
	And yet, what happened was the doctor, Choknovsky, removed his liver instead of his spleen.
	I don't know if they even have a name for that, because nobody would do that.
	You can remove the spleen, but if you remove the liver and the liver-ectomy instead of a spleen-ectomy, that's just murder.
	The surgical snafu resulted in immediate and catastrophic blood loss resulting in death, say the lawyers.
	After erroneously removing his liver, the surgeon labeled the organ as a spleen.
	That's it.
	He pronounced it a spleen.
	It was only identified as a liver after the man's death.
	And of course, I have mentioned before, my parents had a friend who underwent abdominal surgery.
	And a few days later, he's in a lot of pain, he looks down, he sees like this, you know, object pointing there.
	He's like, well, I'm not pregnant.
	Maybe something was left inside of me.
	He goes back to the doctor and says, doctor, I think you left something inside of me.
	The doctor looks at it and he goes, no, no, no, that's not what it is.
	And he walks out, just walks out of the room.
	His entire career flashed before his eyes.
	That's what this guy's doing.
	That is a spleen.
	I'm sticking to that story.
	And it was, by the way, it was a tool, and he did survive, and I don't know that he sued the doctor.
	Back in the day, that's not really what people did all that time.
	Sounds like that doctor has some spleenin' to do.
	Lucy, you got some spleenin' to do.
	Allegedly told Beverly Bryant that her husband's spleen was so diseased that it was four times bigger than usual and had migrated to the other side of his body.
	This guy must have failed basic anatomy.
	I mean, this is a tragedy.
	I don't want to make fun of the loss, but what I'm talking about here is the medical community.
	As many people say, what do you call the guy who finishes last in his Medical class, doctor.
	I think that would be this guy.
	It was so big, it even moved to the other side of his body, where the liver would normally be.
	I just don't understand what's going on.
	In a typical human body, the liver is located on the upper right side of the abdominal cavity, above the stomach, right of the kidneys, intestines, the spleen is located on the upper left of the abdomen.
	Next to the stomach.
	Well, he just gets his left and right mixed up, I guess.
	Completely understandable.
	And it's significantly smaller than the liver, between two and a half to three pounds lighter, and roughly the size of a fist.
	So the law firm alleged that the doctor also performed a previous, quote, wrong sight surgery, unquote, last year.
	In which he was accused of removing a portion of a patient's pancreas instead of performing an adrenal gland reaction, a resection rather, as intended.
	That case was settled.
	So they don't know the terms were not disclosed, but this guy had previously cut out the wrong thing before.
	Just last year.
	And he stayed in the hospital.
	This is the state of medicine.
	And this is the state of these public health doctors that did the lockdown, isn't it?
	Right?
	They removed the wrong things from us.
	They removed everything from us, quite frankly.
	They gave us the wrong medicines.
	But not by mistake.
	It was intentional.
	The problem is, is that we've not done a bureaucracy-ectomy, you know?
	A bureau-ectomy.
	We haven't removed the... We've got to cut out the bureaucracy.
	We've got to remove it like a diseased organ, because that's what it is.
	It's like a tumor.
	It's like a cancer.
	And we haven't removed the bureaucracy.
	As a matter of fact, by leaving it there, It has grown and multiplied, and it's going to be coming back in a vicious way.
	You want to talk about turbo cancer?
	That's what the bureaucracy is.
	We're going to have turbo bureaucracy.
	And it's going to be happening in the federal government, regardless of whether it's Trump or LaLa.
	Because it happened under Trump.
	And it happened under LaLa.
	And nobody has been held to account.
	So of course it's going to continue to grow by leaps and bounds.
	And the difference between the two candidates is which cancers they want to accelerate.
	Which areas of our life do they want to invade and destroy with their bureaucratic tumors?
	Government is a turbo-cancer.
	There's a good analogy years ago in North Carolina.
	We're running, if you know anything about kudzu, It's an invasive plant species that was brought in during FDR's New Deal.
	They wanted to give people something to do.
	So I said, hey, plant kudzu.
	Hyacinths are another thing that they brought in in Florida.
	Clogged up waterways and they can't get rid of them.
	But it's an invasive species now because it's not native.
	And it grows incredibly fast.
	It can grow two or three feet a day.
	Well, I think a better analogy today is turbo-cancer.
	those with me in the Libertarian Party when he was running for office, he made the analogy. He said, government is like kudzu, you know, it's really, really, really hard to get rid of, and it grows so fast. Well, I think a better analogy today is turbo cancer. That's very much like kudzu. And so, as I said earlier, you have now, talk about things growing,
	these long, fibrous clots that are filling up arteries that embalmers are finding in dead people.
	They're also finding that these things continue to grow after the person is dead.
	Here's an embalmer talking about the fibrous growth post-mortem.
	That we're taking from the arteries of a deceased today for us, simply for us to be able to embalm them.
	We are going to dispose of them, but it's just to illustrate what we are finding inside the arteries of the vaccinated deceased in our care.
	This isn't normal.
	This doesn't grow post-mortem.
	It's time somebody got a backbone and some moral compass and actually spoke out and was honest.
	This has got to stop.
	Yeah, it does.
	It does.
	But we don't stop it, do we?
	Just like that doctor, right?
	He got his anatomy confused and cut out the wrong thing a year ago and leaves me there.
	Now he's just killed somebody because they left him there.
	And the idea these things would continue to grow post-mortem.
	What is it?
	What is it that is there?
	As he said, it's time for somebody with a backbone to speak out.
	We all need to speak out.
	And I know that many of you have a backbone as well.
	Many of you did not take the jab.
	And we all have to speak out about this.
	But it's absolutely insane that this continues to go.
	And why does it continue to go?
	Well, a good example of this is in Australia.
	Australia has put together an inquiry.
	A commission, if you will.
	You know, they always do these inquiries.
	The UK has done an inquiry about it.
	Of course, in the US, nobody's even asking enough questions for them to bother to do an inquiry.
	Typically, we call them a commission.
	We had the Kennedy assassination commission, we had the 9-11 commission, and they're there to cover up and to assuage people to lie to us.
	Cause there's nothing to worry about.
	Yeah.
	It's a, we have a, we found a magic bullet, you know, it, it hit this person, then it changed and it goes over, hits that person, another person, another person, you know, all these different things with the Kennedy assassination or, Oh, look, we've got a NIST simulation that says that steel buildings can just collapse on their own without even being hit with a plane.
	Yeah, you believe that stuff?
	This is the kind of stuff that's coming up with these inquiries.
	And so we had a ridiculous inquiry in the UK, and now in Australia they have an inquiry into the excess deaths.
	And what they did there to rig that process was to suppress the majority of the submissions.
	Two-thirds of the submissions made to the Australian government's excess mortality inquiry have been suppressed and key evidence has been omitted.
	In the U.S.
	we just call them commissions because these people that make up the commission, you know, the Warren Commission or whatever, they're involved in the commission of a crime.
	So just call it a commission.
	The world's first inquiry set out to investigate why record high numbers of Australians have died in recent years, including non-COVID deaths, at levels not seen since World War II.
	On Friday, the Excess Mortality Inquiry Committee handed down its report concluding that COVID was the key driver of Australian excess mortality, both directly and indirectly.
	And not the bioweapon shots, of course.
	Now the problem with that is that we had a lot of people who had no flu symptoms who died.
	The problem with it is that, you know, for a year and a half to two years, they didn't have the excess death until the vaccines were brought out.
	And so you have people who are not dying of COVID.
	And it's happening not at the front end of the cleave.
	Remember the cleave?
	Something comes in and now everybody's dying from it.
	And then it does a bell-shaped curve and it tapers off and goes away, right?
	Except that, you know, this didn't happen that way.
	It didn't happen when they discovered it.
	It didn't happen in 2020.
	Didn't happen most of 2021.
	Happened at the tail end of 2021 and the beginning of 2022 is when these deaths were happening.
	And they weren't dying of COVID.
	So the commission says they died of COVID, not of the vaccine.
	It's come to light that the committee buried the majority of submissions made to the inquiry, acknowledging only 31% of the submissions received on the public page.
	Key evidence raised in the process has been entirely omitted from their report.
	Australia saw incredibly high excess mortality that could not be entirely explained by COVID.
	Couldn't be explained at all by COVID.
	Again, should have happened at the beginning of the cleave.
	Leading to calls for further government investigation.
	Excess deaths peaked in 2022 at 12% excess deaths.
	An extra 20,200 deaths above the expected baseline.
	Excess mortality remained high throughout 2023 at 5%.
	That's an excess of 8,400 deaths.
	Former Actuaries Institute spokesperson said mortality doesn't normally vary by more than one to two percent.
	So the excess mortality seen by Australia during the pandemic years is way higher, way higher.
	And of course, we've already had that mentioned in the United States.
	Insurance companies said the deaths that happened in the third and fourth quarter of 2021, they said this beginning of 2022, so it doesn't mean that they didn't continue to grow.
	But the one American insurance company, a big insurance company out of Indiana, CEO said this is, he had to explain because it's a publicly held company, he had to explain why the profits were down.
	Maybe you need to explain why the profits are up, but the morticians, funeral homes, and things like that.
	Anyway, he said this is more than three standard deviations away from the mean, and this is an event that we would not expect to have happen.
	More than once every 200 years.
	And when something like that does happen, it's usually a war.
	In this case, it was a war.
	It was a war by the governments against their own people.
	The Australian government against its people, the New Zealand government against its people, the Canadian government, the UK government, all the European governments, and especially the American government against the world.
	Against the world.
	So, COVID did it.
	The devil made me do it.
	Did COVID do lockdowns?
	Did COVID do the debt?
	The massive debt?
	Yeah, COVID did everything.
	Trump didn't have anything to do with it.
	Biden didn't have anything to do with it.
	It was the COVID.
	COVID.
	Ironically, the actuaries note that the majority of these deaths occurred after the vast majority of the population was vaccinated.
	So, usually it's only going to, mortality is only going to vary by one or two percent, up or down.
	And so, if you look at what happened in 2020, when the pandemic hit, mortality was down by three percent.
	Down three percent.
	Usually it varies one or two percent.
	It was down three percent.
	The worst pandemic the world has ever seen.
	That required the heaviest hand the world has ever seen.
	And every single government, and yet, excess deaths went down.
	The number of deaths went down.
	So you had excess deaths of minus 3%.
	5,241 fewer deaths in the pandemic year of 2020, when it was the worst, when we were the most defenseless.
	We had no vaccine to save us whatsoever.
	We were at the mercy of the COVID virus.
	And yet you had 3% fewer people die that year.
	In 2021, you had 1.5% higher.
	2021, you had 1.5% higher.
	Then the vaccines hit, and it went up to 11.7% and continued to be at 5.1%.
	But yeah, it wasn't the politicians.
	It wasn't their bioweapon.
	It was the COVID thing.
	It must have been those Chinese.
	That's who we'll blame it on, right?
	The lab leak and the Chinese.
	So it was definitely not the vaccines.
	Despite receiving large amounts of correspondence in relation to vaccine injuries, the committee dedicated only a single page of this report to discussion of the potential impact of the vaccines and killing people.
	The committee rejected concerns raised about the impact of the vaccines on excess mortality because of two reasons.
	Number one, official data shows that the vaccines have only killed 16 Australians.
	Well, there you go.
	That's your first reason, because we say so.
	Official data says it only killed 16 Australians.
	Number two, the Actuaries Institute said that in fact, COVID-19 vaccines have significantly reduced excess mortality.
	Oh, yeah.
	The problem is, you know, we save tens of millions of lives all over the world, but I can't talk about it because our base, our beautiful base of which some of you are there, you get angry when we mention the word vaccine.
	Don't get angry.
	You did everything you could to get this vaccine out.
	I know it was one of the greatest achievements we did in less than nine months to be able to do that.
	But now it's taken a twist, right?
	And look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it.
	Yeah, that's right, Candace.
	Don't challenge him.
	Don't challenge him.
	Let him get away with that lie.
	She makes a big bucks too, I tell ya.
	Yeah, we all know what has to be done, don't we?
	And we know what they're doing, don't we?
	Yeah, so it significantly reduced excess mortality, but all of that happened, the excess mortality happened after the deployment of the bioweapon.
	So it got worse.
	Hey, please explain that.
	They cited a single modeling study from New South Wales data.
	One computer model.
	Well, we had one computer model to lock down the world.
	Now we can have one model to rule us all with lies.
	The actuaries extrapolated to estimate that the vaccines saved more than 50,000 lives naturally.
	Millions of people's lives saved worldwide by the Trump shot, as the father of the vaccine just explained to you.
	The study contains too many flaws to list in full.
	The main ones, however, are the miscategorization of anyone within 21 days of their first dose of vaccine to die, right?
	And we've seen this everywhere as well.
	You are not counted in the United States, you're not counted as vaccinated until two, I think it was two weeks.
	It might've been three.
	I think it was two weeks after your second shot.
	So, if you get the vaccine and you drop dead immediately, which a lot of people did, that doesn't count.
	You died of COVID.
	I'm sure you died of COVID.
	Didn't die of the vaccine, though, even though you get shot and drop dead.
	No, you got to wait two weeks before you drop dead or, you know, you're not vaccinated.
	The FDA, meanwhile, has authorized yet another COVID shot that yet again has had no clinical data, no testing whatsoever on humans.
	The FDA has approved a new injection for COVID from Novavax.
	This is the one that Peter McCullough is so excited about, too, by the way.
	Novavax, that's good.
	Moderna, Pfizer, they're not good, but Novavax, that's great.
	That's really great.
	Yeah, take the untested Novavax vaccine because McCullough likes it.
	The Novavax injection was authorized for public use without any clinical trial data being provided whatsoever.
	Well, they do a computer model.
	They even call that, you know, they have a in vitro and vivo and silico.
	Yeah.
	It's silly.
	All right.
	Isn't it?
	Did you do this based on some silly con?
	It is a silly con to believe these computer models, uh, COVID-19 not being treated as a threat to public health.
	And yet the FDA went ahead and rushed this through.
	Dr. Peter Marks, who directs the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation Research.
	Well, that sounds very impressive, doesn't it?
	Said, today's authorization provides an additional COVID vaccine option that meets the FDA standards.
	Zero standards.
	If you show up and pay the right people, you meet their standards.
	How much is that?
	Meets the FDA standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality.
	Needed to support emergency use authorization.
	What emergency?
	There is no COVID and yet they're still doing this.
	Still giving emergency use authorization for this stuff.
	The Fraud and Drug Administration.
	That's what they are.
	The FDA.
	Shut that cesspool down.
	Lock those people up as an example to make sure that this doesn't happen again.
	That's one of the most fraudulent things.
	Given an emergency use authorization, there is no emergency at all with this.
	Just last month, the fraudulent drug administration, FDA, cleared new COVID mRNA shots from Moderna and Pfizer.
	So now it's Novavax's turn to feed at the trough.
	That's what it's about.
	Barbara Lowe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, said the assertion rings hollow when the FDA, the Fraud and Drug Administration, has not required manufacturers of mRNA biological products to provide scientific evidence to the public that safety and effectiveness has been demonstrated.
	So it's not science, if you haven't done that.
	If you've got somebody, a doctor, Peter Marks, The Center for Biologics Evaluation Research.
	Very impressive title.
	And if he says it, then it's like a pronouncement from the Astronomer Royal.
	And we all just do what he says.
	Because it's an argument from authority.
	Not from data.
	Not from evaluation.
	And that's why Francis Bacon, when he gave us the scientific method, He criticized this whole idea of arguments from authority, because you wind up with fraudulent drug administration.
	Novavax president said in a statement, and also the CEO, that the company's vaccine showed, quote, robust cross-reactivity against JN.1 lineage viruses in animals, because it's untested in humans.
	You are the guinea pig if you take this stuff.
	Um, but the reality is that even by their own standards, they say that this strain, this JN 0.1 is no longer irrelevant.
	So they're inconsistent with their own contrived, arbitrary lying standards.
	They can't even be consistent with that.
	They're making this stuff up.
	They're making up the lies.
	And even in this kingdom of lies, this is pure fiction.
	According to the sequence performed by the CDC, JN.1 was displaced in the spring by KP.3 and other variants.
	So it's all BS.1.
	That's what it is.
	Point 10.
	It's our 11.
	It's off the scale.
	It's BS 11.
	Total extreme BS.
	So in Rotterdam.
	A Dutch daily newspaper, as they're getting ready to put out the new Corona vaccines, they ask their readers, are you going to get another Corona prick?
	That's what they call it instead of a vaccine.
	I think over here in the US, that refers to the person giving the vaccine.
	People like Fauci, they are the Corona pricks.
	Just say no to those pricks in the white coat.
	And people are saying no to the Corona pricks in the vial as well.
	V-I-A-L.
	V-I-L-E.
	What's notable is that so far, the outlet has not censored the comments.
	And there are a lot of negative comments.
	You'll find this on exposenews.com.
	Listen to what people had to say.
	Almost 700 people answered it.
	Are you going to get the new vaccine?
	Well, here's what they had to say.
	No, never again.
	That only makes me sick.
	Another.
	No, definitely not.
	I belong to the risk group.
	I had my fourth stroke two weeks after the booster shot.
	Hadn't had a stroke in 10 years.
	Another one.
	No, certainly not.
	I used to get Pfizer because I used to go abroad during the corona period.
	That caused me an autoimmune disease.
	My endocrinologist confirmed to me that it was Pfizer.
	So you will never convince me again.
	Another one.
	I plan not to be vaccinated anymore.
	I wonder if that means all vaccines.
	I had four, but after the Pfizer vaccination, I had a CVA a few weeks later.
	This was later mentioned as a possible side effect.
	Of course, you cannot prove that it was this vaccine, but is it pure coincidence?
	Another one.
	Pedro.
	No, I had brain attacks shortly after the vaccination.
	I'm not saying that was the cause, but you shouldn't take the risk, Fred.
	In my network, there are all symptoms of long COVID, heart attacks, some of them fatal, autoimmune diseases, all have received the corona vaccination.
	So what do you think, he says.
	Are you going to take it?
	What do you think?
	Gerard, there will be no Corona vaccine here.
	Many young people around me have died of bleeding from the brain and other unpleasant diseases associated with these vaccinations.
	Willem, I was just a healthy boy.
	I had a brain attack.
	One of the most, one of the more honest doctors said it could have been due to the vaccines I did, including the many older customers.
	So no more Corona vaccinations for me.
	Martine, after a friend had a cerebral hemorrhage the day after the vaccination, I no longer need it.
	No longer need it.
	B Schumacher, after my wife suffered cerebral damage after the last booster shot, Became very sick and I cared for her at home for a year.
	She decided to help her die at the age of 65.
	Again, these are translations from the Dutch, so they're a bit crude.
	You really don't know what you're vaccinated with.
	No more boosters for me.
	So his wife became crippled and had assisted suicide.
	Eve.
	Absolutely no longer.
	I have been disabled since my first syringe.
	Now I probably have to take medication for the rest of my life.
	Hans.
	No, I can't get a syringe anymore.
	I had a heart attack a year and a half ago.
	The doctor said the three coronavaccinations were a possible cause.
	Louisette.
	No, I already have three vaccines and the last booster shot behind me.
	I had a heart attack last year and now I'm a cardiac patient.
	I wouldn't associate it directly with a vaccine, but I'm taking so many medications now that I think it's enough.
	Andre.
	After the first vaccination with AstraZeneca, I had many complaints, pulmonary embolism.
	A doctor said if we hadn't done that, there could have been more fatal accidents.
	You see?
	Fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
	Do what I say.
	Yeah.
	In other words, you were just unlucky.
	Mirjam.
	No, because since the last vaccine, I have chronic inflammation of mucous membrane in my throat, and I have to cough constantly.
	I spoke to a doctor and he said this is one of the side effects that people don't talk about.
	Chris, last one.
	Never, never again.
	With this Moderna crap, I narrowly escaped the disaster.
	Syringe was, a syringe was enough to cause me terrible pain.
	For 14 days, I couldn't go anywhere.
	Well, in the U.S., Tim Walz offered parents cash to do this to their children as young as five years old.
	He once pushed the Corona vaccines so hard that he offered cash to parents who gave their children as young as five the shot, says Breitbart.
	Breitbart is talking about this.
	Did Breitbart ever do an article on DeWine in Ohio?
	Hey, you've got a lottery now.
	You got a chance to win a million dollars or you might die or be disabled for the rest of your life.
	You want to step right up and roll the dice, right?
	Spin the wheel.
	Big Pfizer wheel up there.
	No, they never talked about DeWine.
	Uh, you know, I'm glad they're talking about Tim Wallace, but let me say this.
	The only motivation that Breitbart has Breitbart, you got people like John Nolte, who was a vaccine cheerleader.
	I'll never forget.
	This is a guy who's his, his beat, his expertise is, is, um, culture of movies.
	And he's out there lecturing everybody with all of the latest stuff from Trump and Fauci.
	I'll never forget how people were getting really hostile to him on Breitbart in the comments.
	Boy, they were really coming after him.
	Rightfully so!
	Breitbart has been a big cheerleader of this, unless it's the Democrats.
	On January 22, Waltz proudly announced a vaccine incentive program.
	Kids deserve to be shot.
	No, kids deserve a shot.
	So, uh, yeah, he said, uh, he offered $200 to families who brought their kids, uh, ages five to 11 to get vaccinated.
	Big news starting this month, families who get their five to 11 year olds vaccinated can get $200.
	I don't know how that that's, that's less than five pieces of silver or 30 pieces of silver, even in today's, uh, devalued dollar.
	That's cash in your pocket for starting the year off right by protecting your child from COVID, said Tim Walls.
	The administration offered a $200 visa card to gift card to Minnesota families who got their children in that age group fully vaccinated.
	In order to be eligible, parents or guardians were required to ensure that the children had both the first and the second shots, two of them, between January the 1st and February 28th.
	At the time, the justification was the Omicron surge.
	Remember that?
	Remember when they did that?
	I'll never forget it.
	That was the first time I had taken a break from the program, and it was a week after Thanksgiving.
	Tony Aardman filled in for me, and the information broke about this new Omicron variant.
	And I said, oh, give me a break.
	And even though Tony was doing the program, I cut a short video and sent it to him.
	I said, put this up.
	You know, people don't be fooled by this Omicron stuff.
	Well, that was what Tim Walz was justifying all this on.
	That was the reason to push vaccinations onto children.
	As Omicron surges across our nation, we're continuing to use every resource we have to keep our families safe and healthy.
	Yeah, he's a cynical liar, just like Trump.
	And just like Lala.
	Kids deserve a shot, he said.
	Well, you know, Breitbart gives Trump a pass when he pushes it on people.
	Tells him, you know, gives him incentives.
	And see, this is exactly what, Waltz was not saying, the only thing that the Republicans will criticize, well, Trump didn't make people do it.
	Well, he gave them incentives and he gave incentives to people to gaslight them and to nudge them to do it and to tell them that it was their Christian duty to their neighbor, to love their neighbor and go get a shot and all the rest of the stuff.
	Trump was paying at a $200 million ad council campaign to do that.
	And so, um, you're going to criticize waltz.
	Waltz did not force anybody to get this.
	He didn't say, uh, get it, or we're going to kick your kid out of school.
	Even.
	I mean, he didn't use coercion.
	And of course, the Democrats like to say, well, we didn't mandate it.
	If we had mandated it, we would have done what Trump supporter Alan Dershowitz said.
	We would have sent somebody to your door, drug you out of your house, pinned you to the ground and injected you.
	Well, that's, that's a mandate.
	No, we just use coercion and arm twisting to do it.
	Well, in this particular case, he used a positive incentive, just like Trump and the Republicans.
	The people, my people, are so smart.
	And you know what else they say about my people?
	The polls.
	They say I have the most loyal people.
	Did you ever see that?
	Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters, okay?
	It's like incredible.
	Or he could shoot and kill the world and he wouldn't lose any voters.
	Not a single one.
	Not even these MAGA tarts.
	None of them.
	They will never call him out.
	Breitbart will never call him out.
	Alex won't call him out.
	WND won't call him out.
	Now the new American won't call him out.
	Zero Hedge won't call him out.
	Nobody will call him out!
	I'm just a cranky old guy.
	Because I'll call him out, I guess.
	That's what I keep getting told.
	Yeah, not going to get past this.
	Not going to give this guy a pardon.
	He doesn't want one.
	He wants credit for what he did.
	So why would you give him a pardon?
	Getting our children, says Tim Walls, getting our children 5 to 11 years old vaccinated gives them critical protection against severe illness and hospitalization and keeps them in school.
	$200 cash in your pocket right now.
	Step right up for getting the easy vaccination done at the start of the year, he said.
	And so Breitbart says, well this comes as Walz ironically touts a quote, mind your own damn business unquote slogan on the campaign trail.
	But again, Trump's okay because he didn't mandate.
	He just incentivized it.
	Right?
	So why does Breitbart criticize one and not the other for doing exactly the same thing?
	They're both despicable, but why don't they criticize that?
	And so, um, When you look at the, I found that picture I was talking about 1986, look at this for kids and the first 12 months of life, uh, 1986, you would get three DPT shots at two, four and six months.
	You'd get oral polio vaccine at two months and at four months.
	But look where we are at 2024.
	You got 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15.
	Let's just not count.
	Let's just say that you got about, uh, uh, you got about 35 shots there and the first year, uh, from birth to, uh, 12 months.
	This is what, uh, Trump was railing to RFK jr.
	About on the phone.
	Just load them up with all these shots.
	I mean, I don't know how many of them it is.
	So I need you to bring some sanity back to this stuff.
	Well, why didn't Trump stop it the first time around?
	And why didn't he keep, why didn't he put RFK Jr., he called RFK Jr.
	to the Trump Tower.
	Why didn't he put him on a team then to stop all this stuff?
	Because Trump had talked about that before he got elected president in 2016.
	It talked about all of that stuff.
	And then he brings RFK Jr.
	in to talk about that.
	Except when Pfizer gave him a million dollars and then he just said bye-bye.
	And he puts the CEO of Eli Lilly in charge.
	He was just negotiating and haggling for the price.
	But we have a moral responsibility.
	I've seen one Christian publication after the other.
	You have a moral responsibility to vote for Trump.
	Do you?
	You really want to believe that character doesn't matter?
	You really want to believe what he has to say about any policy statements?
	If character doesn't matter, how can you trust him on any policy issue?
	Because he lied about all of them the first time through.
	Well, close contacts of MPOC's cases are now being quarantined for 21 days in Singapore.
	You see, this is not going to end.
	And how do we do this?
	All politics is local.
	All quarantines are local.
	All face masks are local.
	All of these mandates, all these coercions are local.
	Therefore, vote for the federal level.
	That's where all your solutions are, in the federal level.
	Really?
	So, we're going to talk about that when we come back.
	But first, when we come back, we're going to talk about the Griftergate.
	What's going on with these people, these very well-known so-called conservatives?
	Trump sycophants.
	I'm going to call them conservative commentators.
	They're Trump sycophants to the man.
	Every last one of them just sucking on Trump in the most disgusting ways.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	♪♪
	revolutionary act.
	you You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, let me just say, I've got a very different take on this than everybody else does.
	I think this is about completely different issues than everybody else is bringing up.
	have all worked with this company, Tenet Media. Well let me just say I've got a very different take on this than everybody else does. I think this is about completely different issues than everybody else is bringing up and I have a theory about why this is showing up at this point in time.
	Because there's nothing about this in the mainstream alternative media.
	They're avoiding this.
	Just like there's nothing in the mainstream media about the CCP and their agent on the inside who was the deputy chief of staff, the number two person, and Hochul's staff, the New York governor.
	Mainstream media is ignoring that.
	Mainstream alternative media is ignoring this.
	What do they have in common?
	Well, they're alternative narratives.
	One of them, the boogeyman, is China.
	The other one, the boogeyman, is Russia.
	And they're boogeymen.
	Let's understand they are boogeymen.
	They're bad.
	Okay.
	But having said that, the FBI's purpose in doing this on both sides, in my opinion, is to Lay a foundation for future censorship.
	In the same way, when they come after TikTok, it's because they ultimately want to come after Twitter as well, right?
	And so when they come after the connections of the CCP in New York, and then the next day you see this coming out about connections to Russia, Through the media.
	They're laying the foundation for fear, uncertainty, doubt, and censorship.
	That's what they're laying the foundation for.
	Oh, we got to control this because we've got these foreign powers that are trying to manipulate our election.
	Well, you know, we could do something about it.
	We could have more free speech instead of less free speech.
	We could have an honest election.
	We could have open ballots.
	We could have open debates.
	No, we're not going to have any of that.
	They don't have the candidates debate each other.
	Now they don't want you debating each other.
	They don't want you debating the candidates.
	Gotta shut up.
	Just listen to what they have to say.
	A federal indictment unsealed yesterday alleges that a Tennessee-based media company which played home to several prominent right-leaning online commentators was secretly a Russian government-backed influence operation.
	The company was accused of receiving nearly $10 million from Russia Today, a Russian state-backed media company, as part of, quote, a scheme to create and distribute content to the U.S.
	audiences with hidden Russian government messaging, said Attorney General Merrick Garland.
	Well, let me just say this, you know, RT has been purged and banned from a lot of different places.
	I can still find it, and I still look at their articles.
	And some of them are obviously propaganda.
	I've said for the longest time, Russia will lie to you, RT will lie to you about everything that's happening in Russia.
	And they'll probably lie to you about what's going on in Ukraine as well.
	But they'll tell you the truth about the other side.
	You know, when you've got a war situation with Ukraine and Russia, everybody's lying about everything.
	It's the same thing that we're seeing with Israel and Gaza.
	Some people are telling the truth, but it's impossible to sort the truth out in the middle of a war, because both sides are using so much lies and propaganda.
	That's why I don't really talk about these two things that much, except to say, look, we've got to stop it.
	There's gonna get out of control.
	Gonna stop it in both places.
	But you can look at Russia today, and you can look at other news media.
	Look, the bias is obvious, isn't it?
	So many people pretend that, well, people are going to go to pick a site.
	They're going to go to CNN, or they're going to go to Fox News, or they're going to go to Breitbart, or they're going to go to pick another site.
	And they're going to believe everything they see there.
	Well, some people may be like that.
	Some people may depend only on one news source.
	That's one of the reasons why you don't look at one news source.
	I look at more than four dozen a day.
	And when you look at four dozen a day, you start to see a pattern evolve and you start to see biases evolve and start to see the fact that one group will talk about this and completely avoid what was the top story for the other group and vice versa.
	You know, you have a Hegelian media now.
	Both sides are trying to manipulate each other, and I've talked about this in the sense that it's gone beyond just, you know, telling people what they want to hear, and doing it for money, because that's how this started.
	It's the self-interest of these people in both these media groups, telling people what they want to hear for money.
	So I call it griftergate.
	But now it's gotten to the point where people who only look at mainstream media sources or people only look at mainstream alternative media sources Have completely different view of what's going on.
	They never hear this other side over here.
	They never see the negative news about this.
	They never see the negative polls.
	Even when you look at the polls, the expectations of who's going to win.
	Of course, both of them, both sides are telling you that the most important thing in your life right now is the presidential election.
	And it is not.
	It's not even important.
	I'm telling you, the presidential election is the least important thing in your life.
	Oh, heresy, they say.
	Yes.
	Well, as I said before, unless you live in seven states, your vote doesn't even matter.
	And it probably doesn't matter in those states.
	Because you're assuming, if it matters, you're assuming that there's only going to be a one vote margin.
	You're assuming that the votes are going to be counted, honestly?
	Are you serious?
	You seriously think your vote counts?
	Come on, talk to me about it.
	Let's have that argument.
	I'll talk to you about it.
	What absolute and utter nonsense.
	But your vote can make a difference at a local election.
	And the more local the election is, the more your vote or your contribution is going to matter.
	And that's where all politics is.
	All politics is local.
	That's why they want you focused exclusively on the presidential election and why they're feeding you two different narratives.
	Both of these sides think that their candidate is ahead.
	Both of these sides have polls or some other metric or some other election expert who says, Lala is going to win, or Benedict Donald is going to win.
	They've got their own narrative that they're building.
	Oh, look, they're ahead in the polls.
	And then one of them will say, well, OK, we're behind in the national polls, but we're ahead in enough of the battleground states that we're going to win, or whatever.
	They always have a way that, whether you're talking about CNN or you're talking about Breitbart, they will come up with statistics that will show their candidate And their bias is so obvious.
	How could anybody miss it?
	Unless they're your only news source.
	Or unless you only go to other news sources like them.
	But what they're doing is they're creating an expectation that it's a slam dunk for our guy to win.
	So when our guy does not win, and that's going to happen to one of the two sides, Then they're ready to go to war over it.
	That's what's so dangerous about this.
	It's not only stupid, it's dangerously stupid.
	And so, Benny Johnson tweeted that he and other influencers had been victims in the alleged scheme.
	And of course, the indictment says that they were.
	The indictment doesn't accuse them of any wrongdoing.
	Uh, Tim Pool echoed that line.
	He said, quote, should these allegations prove true, I, as well as other personalities and commentators were deceived and are victims.
	Dave Rubin also described himself as a victim.
	He said, I knew absolutely nothing.
	I know nothing about this fraudulent activity, period.
	Uh, so, um, it was RT and some of their employees.
	Now, again, uh, RT has got their own take on things, their own spin on things.
	And.
	Don't they all?
	I mean, is RT any more of a propaganda organization than the New York Times, or the Washington Post, or CNN, or Fox, or Breitbart, or Infowars?
	Absolutely not!
	They've got their own bias!
	And if you really want to be informed, you take a look at all this stuff.
	That's what Gerald Salendi does, right?
	It's what I've done for years.
	Gerald looks, he gets, he subscribes to all these papers and everything else out there.
	Then he looks at the data himself and he applies critical thought, discernment, things like that.
	You know, that's the way you do the news.
	You look at both sides and then you make your determination based on your experience, based on your discernment and based on what is clearly their bias.
	And there is a bias, even in what they talk about.
	And what they talk about now, it is, they are completely orthogonal to each other.
	There is no overlap.
	If you got a Venn diagram, these circles aren't even touching.
	You got two completely different universes that people are reading, and that's a very dangerous thing.
	But RT is no more, no less propaganda than all the mainstream media sites, than all the mainstream alternative media sites.
	You've just got to sort it out.
	By the way, I talked about Gerald.
	Um, if you go to, um, trends, journal.com, you can save 10% off of a subscription.
	If you use the code name night and let him know that you came through me 10% off, it means that you'll pay only, uh, just over $2 a week versus $5 a day for something like the wall street journal.
	Gerald reads the Wall Street Journal, so you don't have to!
	And that's enough right there!
	You know, he reads all these horrible publications that are, you know, a lot of propaganda on both sides of everything, and so you don't have to read them, but of course you can, and he does quote his sources and tells you why he has that, but he focuses, he doesn't focus on the fluff either. He focuses on the trends of geopolitics and economics. So again, trendsjournal.com, 10% off if you use the code KNIGHT. Well, again, it's not hard to sort through
	this stuff if you really want to, but the founders of Tenet Media are Lauren Chin and her husband.
	Chin is an influencer and a YouTuber who has hosted a show on BlazeTV.
	be.
	She's affiliated with Glenn Beck.
	She's also affiliated with Turning Point USA.
	Hmm.
	Okay.
	Well, um, there he is.
	Uh, another guy that's all about the money.
	You know, it's amazing.
	Her husband identifies himself on Twitter as a president of Tenet Media.
	On Rumble, Radisbro, thank you very much.
	Appreciate the tip.
	How do I get to be a victim who receives millions of dollars?
	See, that's what I'm trying to work out.
	It's like, it's like, make me a victim.
	Take my wife, please, as anyone would say.
	Well, make me a victim, please.
	I don't know.
	This is crazy.
	Yeah, Charlie Kirk, they were Turning Point USA.
	Millions and millions a year that he makes as well.
	So anyway, they shared a video in a company Discord channel of what the indictment calls a quote, well-known US political commentator visiting a grocery store in Russia.
	Well, we know who that is.
	Tucker Carlson, right?
	Later that day, the indictment says, Producer one, we don't know who that is because they referred to some of these people, you know, um, Dave Rubin, Tim pool, these guys that referred to as like commentator one, commentator two, commentator three, that type of stuff.
	Uh, so producer one, uh, gets a, um, a thing sent to him from the people that are going to be paying them a hundred thousand dollars per podcast or in the case of, uh, uh, Benny Johnson, uh, $400,000 per podcast, one podcast.
	One podcast instead of years of three hours a day, five days a week.
	It's like, what is going on?
	I think I'm doing this wrong here.
	I don't know what's going on.
	I gotta, I gotta pick sides and suck up to somebody.
	Come on.
	This is a, so anyway, Tucker Carlson video about him going grocery shopping in Russia.
	And, um, so the person replied and says, sharing this just feels like overt shilling.
	Yeah, because Tucker was shilling.
	That was one of the most cringy things that, well, all of that stuff that he did in Russia.
	Yeah.
	He goes into the subway.
	It's like, look at how wonderful the subway is, you know, and, uh, it's got crown molding and things like that.
	It's like, great.
	Okay.
	Uh, and then he zooms in on a mosaic of linen of linen.
	It's like, didn't your CIA dad tell you any better about that?
	Do they not like linen or do they like linen?
	I don't know the CIA.
	Maybe they do.
	They share a lot of the same attributes, don't they?
	Um, uh, that made me want to puke as well.
	Tucker, you're zooming in on linen.
	There's this wonderful place there.
	Uh, and then he goes grocery shopping.
	Isn't it wonderful?
	They got groceries in Russia.
	Wow.
	And grocery stores.
	Uh, he says it feels like overt shilling.
	Uh, but then, um, founder two replied that founder one thinks that we should put it out there.
	And so then, uh, the producer who had said, this feels like I'm shilling said, okay, I'll put it out tomorrow.
	Oh, see, that's how this works already.
	They're starting to have some influence with them.
	But, um, as they point out, Tim pool said, look, I do my own content here.
	Nobody told me anything to put in there yet.
	And I don't think that they probably did at that point.
	It's going to be a gradual process.
	They get you hooked on the money.
	Then they tell you, okay, now I want you to put this spin on it.
	So at an Aspen Institute event, an Aspen Institute event, where's that coming from?
	It's just like this guy that got all this big money to run nonstop TV ads on Fox and everything against Frank Nicely in a state Senate race.
	Where'd he get his money from?
	Well, he got his money from the Walton family.
	And this person who's very big at the Aspen Institute, you got a Republican, big out-of-state money given to a Republican to defeat a genuine conservative Republican.
	Somebody who's connected to the Aspen Institute.
	So now they're going to push forward this guy as a Republican in the final election.
	So you've got a choice between a Democrat and a guy who is a wolf in sheep's clothing.
	Running as a Republican in the general election.
	The Aspen Institute.
	One of the last things Tenet posted on their social media sites before the indictment was unsealed, concerned, ironically enough, says, and this is coming from Mother Jones, radical left publication.
	Ironically enough, they talked about a government employee accused of secretly acting as a foreign agent.
	Now listen to the way Mother Jones talks about this, dismissing it.
	Tenet posted a video of Linda Sun, a former aide to New York Governors Andrew Cuomo and Kathy Hochul, who has been charged with using her position to benefit the Chinese government.
	Tenet seemed to suggest that a few words that Sun offered on a video call endorsing diversity, equity, and inclusion measures were part of an alleged foreign-backed messaging plot.
	So what's the worry about all this stuff?
	She's being paid by the CCP to influence New York governors.
	But hey, this is what we see as inclusivity and diversity here in the United States.
	That's their excuse for it.
	You see how polarized everything is?
	Just like Breitbart will make excuses for Trump for doing, for bribing people or completely ignore the fact that he bribed governors to do this stuff or completely ignore that Republican governors bribe people.
	They'll focus on Waltz bribing people.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Focus on that.
	But here, they just completely dismiss this issue about the Chinese Communist Party infiltration of the New York State government at the highest level.
	Just push it away.
	And then they focus on this other thing.
	And folks, nothing really happened in either of these events.
	Nothing really happened with this Chinese communist agent from what they've got in the indictment so far.
	I mean, what this person was doing was making sure that the New York government and the governor's office did not say anything at all about Taiwan or acknowledge any gifts from Taiwan or any of that kind of stuff.
	It was just there to tell them to shut up about Taiwan and to make sure that nothing was said about Taiwan.
	Because Taiwan's got to not exist.
	That's what they had her there for.
	Because nobody, you know, Kathy Hochul and Cuomo, they don't know anything.
	The Chinese want to know anything about.
	And the same thing is happening on this side.
	By the way, the employees are coming from RT, one of them is called Kalashnikov.
	I'd not be suspicious at all.
	Anyway, the big story, in my opinion, is the amount of dollars that are paid to these conservative influencers to shill.
	And they're being paid those big dollars.
	Whether those big dollars are coming from RT or from some billionaire backer of Trump, I don't really care.
	When you look at the fact that Travis Kelsey and his brother I've gotten a contract that is like the size of Joe Rogan's contract to have a podcast.
	I mean, they're going to get paid tens of millions a year, just like Joe Rogan.
	And a multi-year contract, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars that they're going to get paid.
	To me, that's the big story.
	That's the grifter gate.
	That you're going to be influenced by people who are being paid tens of millions of dollars a year?
	Why do they find such favor with these organizations like Spotify who won't even carry my podcast?
	They've banned me.
	They won't allow my podcast on their platform, period.
	Not that they won't pay me.
	They won't even allow my podcast there.
	And how are these people then paying, you know, the boyfriend of Taylor Swift and a former comedian and martial arts guy who knows nothing.
	He's always a stunt, just like Tucker.
	Really?
	What's going on?
	Wow.
	Wow.
	Um, but they know, they know they're influencing people.
	Why is that happening?
	You know, we saw this with small influencers on YouTube, uh, the Trump administration.
	Uh, was paying small influencers on YouTube to push COVID fear, to push vaccine hope.
	They were paying these people to do interviews with Fauci and all the rest of this stuff.
	Uh, these are people who overall were very small in terms of their audience, but they were still getting paid to interview Fauci to push this stuff out there.
	Uh, so, you know, it's the money, the money.
	It's kind of like that old joke, you know, the guy's going, every day he's going across the border.
	And the border patrol agents think this guy's really up to something.
	He's smuggling something.
	We can't figure, I mean, we've, we've checked him out.
	We've got the dogs on him.
	They can't smell any drugs, nothing in there.
	Finally, once somebody realizes he's got a different bicycle every day, he's smuggling bicycles across the border.
	See, this isn't about Russia and China.
	This is about internal wars of the American government against you.
	Manipulate your opinion and these people are willing participants in it.
	They'll take once you start taking this kind of money.
	You'll say anything to keep that kind of money going.
	And so as a good example of it, and I've played this before, but Tim pool, for example, Tim pool and Laura Loomer.
	Look at what they did when they were challenged by Luke Grodowski.
	Why can't Trump just come out and tell people the truth?
	That the vaccines are bad.
	Tell people I made a mistake.
	Oh, that'll never happen.
	And so, and we know that's not gonna happen.
	Why?
	Because he's a narcissist.
	He's never going to admit it.
	People in power will never admit to a mistake.
	They'll make multiple mistakes rather than admit to one.
	But you have Tim Pool and Laura Loomer cover for him.
	Cover for him.
	We need an acknowledgement from Donald about what happened to Operation Warp Speed.
	There's been a lot of Americans that have been injured.
	One of them was here at the... I'm so sick of talking about this, Dave.
	I'm just getting started.
	That's Tim Pool.
	He's sick of talking about it, because it tells people the truth about Trump, and that's how he makes his money.
	You've got Trump derangement.
	He's an idiot.
	it again because there isn't a conversation about, hey, I learned my lesson, hey, there's some mistakes, I should have done something better.
	Absolutely not.
	Absolutely not.
	When still he's telling people to get boosted just a few months ago.
	You've got Trump derangement.
	He's an idiot.
	You're an idiot, Tim.
	You're an idiot.
	You've got no information.
	Journalists who don't like Donald Trump actually arguing with people over this and they're putting things like, man, I really don't like Trump.
	But Operation Warp Speed was therapeutics and vaccines by choice.
	It was never forcing people to get medical treatments.
	And when that happened, he came out and said they shouldn't be doing this.
	And now years later, I'm almost like, dude, it's It's four years later.
	Okay.
	I get it so it was the election We should never forget how bad those things were, but it's weird to me that we look at these blue state governors who literally murdered people in New York and it's like, but Donald Trump, it funded scientific research.
	Can I just say something too?
	It goes back to the concept of revolution.
	People have to provide for their families.
	And so I'm not trying to sound like a cold hearted bitch with what I'm about to say.
	But you do.
	You do.
	Everybody has choices.
	Everybody has free will.
	And I'm really sick and tired of listening to people say things like, Oh, I would have lost my job or, Oh, well, you know, I would have been fired.
	You either stand for, you either stand for something or you fall for everything.
	You either tell people that she has lied.
	She has made a profession out of deceiving people and sharing Donald Trump.
	And she has the audacity to say, well, you know, these other people that took the vaccine because they had no integrity, they caved.
	These people are disgusting.
	Absolutely, that's the griftergate, folks.
	That's the issue with Tim Pool and these other fools that are out there.
	It's not that there's some secret conspiracy with RT.
	They're lying to you, to your face!
	For the shekels.
	That's what they're getting.
	It's been pointed out that Lauren Chin has recently been trying to divide Donald Trump's base.
	See?
	There you go.
	This is what Zero Hedge is doing.
	So you're either with Trump or you're with them.
	If you criticize anything that Trump did, it's because you've got Trump Derangement Syndrome.
	They've got a delusion.
	A strong delusion.
	Uh, Tim Pool says, uh, I, as well as the other personalities and commentators were deceived and are victims and ends by telling haters to eat my, and we'll just leave that blank.
	Um, you know, it's classy as always.
	Classy as always, Tim.
	Laura Loomer says the real victims, uh, you know, the people who've been killed disabled by the shots that Trump rubber stamped.
	And said we're going to do it without testing.
	Why?
	For his political gain.
	He put out untested stuff for his political gain.
	He established that as a precedent, just like he established gun control by executive order for his political gain.
	He created it.
	He chaired it.
	But the people who took it, they deserve what they got.
	No sympathy at all from Laura Loomer.
	No justice.
	Bottom line, these people are making hundreds of thousands of dollars per episode.
	Just from this one outlet here.
	That's why they will look you in the eye and lie to you, just like Harry Mullis said about Fauci and the PCR test.
	Same thing.
	Just like the teen influencers.
	Just like Alex Jones at Influence Wars.
	That's what that place should be called.
	It's Influence Wars.
	And they're silent about all of this stuff.
	Silent about this, but they'll talk about the CCP agent that was there.
	You know, I just hope that people aren't going to follow Trump into another January the 6th thing, as I said yesterday.
	He admitted, finally, Trump admitted that he lost, and he's really kind of losing it.
	You know, he actually told the truth, and he gets It gets Megyn Kelly confused with Rosie O'Donnell.
	Karen said, I bet Megyn Kelly really hates being confused with Rosie O'Donnell.
	How do you think you'll do in the debate coming up?
	It's in a few days.
	So I've done a lot of debating, only as a politician.
	I never debated.
	My first debate was the Rosie O'Donnell debate, right?
	The famous Rosie O'Donnell debate, the answer.
	But I've done well with debates.
	I mean, I became president.
	The first debate was Megyn Kelly.
	Millions more votes than I got the first time.
	I was told if I got 63 million, which is what I got the first time, you would win.
	You can't not win.
	And I got millions of more votes than that.
	Lost by a whisker.
	But, and look what happened.
	Lost by a whisker.
	All of the wars and all of the problems.
	Yeah, well, you know, you're lost by a whisker.
	So what did you do?
	You and Alex Jones created Stop the Steal and Save America, and you made millions of dollars, tens of millions of dollars, in this case, hundreds of millions of dollars.
	I don't know how much Alex made.
	He made a lot.
	Lying to people.
	You lied to people.
	You lied them into January the 6th.
	And then you left them to twist in the wind.
	You abandoned them that day.
	And then you abandoned them to your political enemies because you knew you didn't win.
	And because you knew they were going to be coming after you.
	Lost by a whisker.
	Well, let's hope that these people don't follow him again.
	So, again, They've got two different worlds that they've created for people, and they don't engage or explain anything.
	It's kind of like what we see all the time, what I've seen all the time, when you are trying to evaluate Christian truths, and you've got different denominations that have different doctrines and understandings of things, and they'll have their proof texts, right?
	Well, this one says this, and then the other group will say, but mine says this, and it's different.
	And it's very rare that you'll find somebody that will try to reconcile these two things, and say, well, yes, it says that, but here's the context and why I think that that is actually in agreement with this over here.
	Most people don't do that.
	Most people just respond to truth text A over here out of context with truth text B over here out of context.
	And say, that's it!
	And that's what is happening to the news now.
	Why?
	Because politics has become a religion.
	And these people are strawman commentators.
	They have strawmen that are out there.
	It's all about the money.
	All about the money.
	And the money comes first, and the nudging and the manipulation will come later, after they're hooked on the money.
	On Rumble, Marky Mark, New Jersey, thank you for the tip, says the only thing you're doing wrong, Dave, is to tell the truth.
	You skewer everybody's sacred cows so you upset everybody.
	I know, I know.
	People say I'm black pilled, but you know what?
	I can't swallow this stuff anymore.
	I just can't swallow the lies of the dark.
	They make me want to puke and I can't help but talk about this.
	I've seen the lies of politics and I've seen what goes on at these media organizations.
	I know a lot of these characters personally.
	And I can't stomach it anymore.
	I am sick and tired of it.
	I couldn't do it for any amount of money.
	He says, since you don't get $400,000 per podcast.
	I know, I can't control myself.
	Dougalug, thank you for the tip very much on Rockfin and on Rumble.
	Jim Z7 says, Pfizer loves Kelsey.
	Yes.
	He reaches the dummies who worship the NFL.
	Yeah, he got a lot of money.
	For endorsing the jab, didn't he?
	Blood money as far as I'm concerned.
	And I think it's blood money for the rest of this stuff as well.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	They're doing what?
	In the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	This is the David Knight Show.
	Well, we're talking about money.
	Let's talk a little bit more about what's happening with markets and interest rates and gold and all the rest of the stuff.
	We had the Dow Jones fall yesterday by more than 600 points.
	Uh, let's say that was on actually Tuesday afternoon.
	So this is a one day after, um, fell by 626 points, one half percent.
	And of course, I've got a message yesterday.
	Since I have cash app, uh, they send me stuff about, uh, when Bitcoin, I'm not getting stuff all the time, but Bitcoin is down by 5%.
	Bitcoin is up by 5%.
	And I'm thinking about it.
	It's like, I'm sorry.
	I just can't handle it.
	Putting a lot of money into an asset that's jumping up and down by five points every other day, you know?
	Up one day by five points and down the next day by five points.
	Like I said, I can't ride that roller coaster.
	I'm too old for roller coasters, physical or financial.
	Physical or fiscal, I should say, right?
	Why is gold moving lower?
	This is asked by Kitco.
	Despite the widespread expectation of the Fed cutting interest rates this month, which will be inflationary and devaluing of the dollar, the precious metal continues to decline.
	Many traders are wondering why the sell-off is occurring.
	And again, don't worry about that.
	As Tony always says, you have to look at this in terms of long-term.
	Instead of pricing gold and dollars, You need to price the real world in terms of gold.
	And if you do that, you see that it is wealth insurance.
	You see that it is there as stable.
	And now there's a whole new reason.
	Because when we look at the global ID, we look at the mark of the beast system.
	You want to start preparing now with skills to be outside of that system, but also with some currency that's going to be outside of that system.
	And gold clicks that box.
	The entire issue originated from the Fed's statement that they don't anticipate further weakness in the labor market.
	Why, you know, why would we believe any of the stuff that's coming out of it?
	Everybody knows that they lie about every quarter about what the labor statistics are.
	It's an outright lie.
	And then they adjust it the next month.
	So they give you an optimistic picture of the employment rate, right, or unemployment.
	They make it look good, and then three months later, they're going to revise what they just told you today.
	And what they just told you today, they're going to say, well, that was optimistic.
	That was too rosy.
	We moved it down.
	They moved it down nearly a record amount.
	It was just, as Trump would say, a whisker of the biggest move, biggest lie that they've ever told before.
	Over 800,000 jobs just disappeared like that.
	Okay?
	And so people are like, oh, well, that shocked the stock market, other people, but Federal Reserve says, no, we think the labor market is still good.
	They did that so they can make the current figures look better.
	Right?
	Oh, look, our trend is now up since we lowered the numbers from three months ago by $800,000.
	This is making speculators believe that if the weakness continues, especially given the way that we have two important readings due this week with respect to the labor market, that the Fed may take some unprecedented steps and announce a higher rate cut.
	But if we look at the yearly gain for gold, it is still quite decent.
	This has led traders to believe that it's time for some of them to take some profits and sell.
	Finally, the strength of the dollar index is largely due to the traders in the forex foreign exchange market.
	Being highly concerned about the decline in the Japanese yen.
	So again, not so much the dollar versus gold, but it's also the dollar versus other currencies that are out there.
	So where do some of these people think it's going to go?
	And this doesn't mean that it's going to go there, but it's just a kind of a general consensus.
	And of course, consensus can become a self fulfilling prophecy.
	If the central banks all think that gold is the thing to have, Because it's going to be stable or because it's going to go up in value, because their fiat currencies are going to go down.
	Well, that's a self-fulfilling prophecy right there.
	If you've got other people who are doing this, you've got the World Gold Council's Joe Cavitone says he thinks it's going to be somewhere soon.
	It'll be somewhere between $2,700 and $3,000.
	You've got Goldman Sachs saying the same thing, essentially.
	They're saying it's going to hit $2,700 in early 2025.
	That's not even a big reach anymore, considering how much it has already gone up the last few years, and considering the economic uncertainty that we have here.
	But again, this was republished just yesterday.
	This is something that they initially put up in April of this year.
	There's an interview that Peter Schiff had with Patrick Bet-David, and Peter Schiff said he thinks that gold is going to go to $10,000 to $20,000 an ounce.
	Well, I think that is not realistic, frankly.
	And the reason that he's saying that, I went through this thing and said, why is he saying it?
	And the guy says, this is not the first time he's said it either in this interview.
	The reason he's saying it is not because of, well in a sense, because of financial collapse.
	He thinks that the system may be ready to go back to a gold standard.
	And if we went back to a gold standard, then he said the price could be $10,000 to $60,000 an ounce.
	But I don't think we're ever going to go back to a gold standard.
	They're always going to have some kind of a fiat currency.
	Even if they go to a central bank digital currency or something like that, it's still going to be essentially a fiat currency, but it'll have all the controls and surveillance of a CBDC.
	But it'll be based on proof of, excuse me, proof of stake.
	Proof of stake rather than proof of work.
	And proof of stake means it's this value because that's what I say it is.
	It's fiat currency.
	Yeah.
	We own this thing.
	Right.
	And I'm going to tell you, because I own it, I'm going to tell you what the value is.
	As opposed to somebody honestly doing, you know, having some constraint in terms like, like a Bitcoin where they have to mine it, you know, just like you have to physically mine gold while they have to do some work.
	To do Bitcoin and you have a limit to the number of these things and it gets more harder and harder to make it.
	So there's inherent in its structure.
	There are some controlling things, whereas these other people, they just say, well, we just want to have proof of stake.
	I'm a stakeholder.
	This is what I say it's worth.
	I don't think they're going to go to gold as a standard there.
	He says, um, we know not that there is a plan to go to a gold standard that is in place.
	If that happens the only way that I see that happening is if we get into some kind of hyperinflation and again you know they'll be printing trillion dollar pieces of paper or trillion dollar coins or something if that were to happen and he said and if that were if you know plan to go to a gold back dollar is there and so but I would not count on that what I would count on
	Is we're going to have a lot of inflation, and we're going to have stagflation or dragflation, as Gerald Cilenti pointed out.
	And we're also going to have something that we've never seen before, and that is the push to get people involved in this surveillance, Mark of the Beast currency, the CBDC, Central Bank Digital Currency.
	And so to me, that is a big, big part of the reason that you want to have gold.
	Have something that is private, that is out of sight to them, out of their reach, perhaps, depending on how you store it.
	And so, to me, that is the biggest reason to accumulate it.
	But we're also in some very uncertain economic times, which would make a currency unstable storage of your wealth, whereas gold will be. That's the bottom line.
	David Knight. Gold will take you to Tony Aardman and you can get gold, silver, small or large amounts. Tony is not with us today. He is on the road traveling, but you can become a member of Wolfpack.
	He's set up something, different tiers, from $35, $50 on up.
	And you can, each month, you can set aside a little bit of gold or silver.
	And as part of a buying group, you can get a group discount there at davidknight.gold.
	That's Tony Aardman's Wise Wolf Gold.
	A great guy to deal with.
	I've known him for a very long time.
	And this is a great time to start making some moves outside of the system that we all know is about to collapse.
	TikTokers now left in massive debt after they tried to exploit a Chase Bank glitch that was there.
	They call it an infinite money glitch.
	And they put up TikTok videos showing themselves going to, I mean, this is how stupid people are.
	This is on winepress.news, but it's a lot of things.
	You can see this on social media, people actually doing it.
	Travis is laughing.
	My other son was laughing about it.
	It's like, watch this.
	I'm going to commit, I'm going to commit bank fraud and I'm going to film myself doing it.
	So they're taking out like a hundred million dollars and, you know, just are whatever they can get out of these machines.
	And one person took a shot of their bank account.
	So they had a negative balance of minus 99,999,999 type of thing.
	But yeah, they take pictures and put them up on social media of them committing crimes like that.
	And Whistler said, well, they've been able to walk into all these retailers in California and just take whatever they want.
	So I guess they figured crime's not got no consequences yet.
	And it's like, OK, well, we can if we can loot stores, I guess we can rob banks, too.
	Well.
	Now they're dealing with a different group of people.
	They're going to find out.
	Is this the same bank that keeps the Sinaloa Cartel's money?
	Because they're not going to be happy about that.
	That's right.
	Yeah, that was HSBC.
	But of course, Chase Bank and JP Morgan, they've always been around with the mob.
	So yeah, these people took pictures of themselves.
	You're going to do stupid stuff, and you're going to find out what's going on with this.
	The unlimited money glitch.
	Which is really nothing other than check cashing fraud.
	They wrote checks for things they didn't have, put it into the machine, and then withdrew the money.
	Well, it gave them a credit, temporarily, and they realized that with that temporary credit, they could withdraw money.
	And they did it real quickly.
	See, the only people that can do that kind of stuff is the government.
	It's called fiat currency.
	They just did that to a large extent.
	But as I said, when we look at the collapse of the dollar in the financial system, we have Turkey has now applied to join BRICS.
	A lot of moves like this, and this is about geopolitics.
	You saw, I didn't spend time on it, but you've probably seen, they had some US Marines that were on leave in Turkey, and they were attacked by a mob.
	And they said, you got blood on your hands.
	And they were angry, I think, about what's going on in Israel.
	And they see the US as allies of Israel.
	So they attacked these Marines on the street.
	And they attack one guy.
	About five guys around him put a sack over his head.
	And then just before the video ends, you see another Marine come in and punch him.
	Okay, maybe you guys bit off a little bit more than you could chew.
	They wound up having, I think, seven Marines and then 15 of these guys there.
	And then eventually they arrested a sailor as well.
	So there's a lot of anger and animosity.
	And of course, the U.S.
	was there in a joint exercise with Turkey, but these are people on the street.
	Meanwhile, the government of Turkey is upset about the fact that They're being kept out of, you know, they're in NATO, but they're being kept out of, I think, some of the European Union things, and so they're making moves towards the Kremlin.
	This is all about the sanctions.
	We're all about geopolitics as well.
	The sanctions really started to kick the dollar down the hill.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about some of these people who are looking at the considerations as to who we should vote for.
	Because we've had some interesting things.
	Some people have really nailed it.
	Other people have missed it by a mile.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	And now, The David Nutt Show.
	you With bad and worse options, how should Christians think about voting in this climate?
	You know, this is being asked by a lot of different Christian publications.
	They're all weighing in on this issue.
	And I gotta say, most of them got it wrong, in my opinion.
	And I'll tell you why I think that.
	I think they got it wrong because I think it depends on what you think about Christ.
	If you are a Christian, what do you think about Christ?
	Do you trust Him with the consequences if you do the right thing?
	Or are you kind of getting tired of, you know, this and you want to take care of it yourself?
	And you've got a better idea, you know?
	I think that I can fix it.
	So let's just forget about the principles.
	And if these people betray principles, we'll just say they're playing 4D chess or something like that.
	We can just move it along that way, right?
	You know, I think we had a lot of people, Jason Barker always comes to mind, he wrote me a long letter, I haven't passed on yet to you, but talking about the different things that happened as he was facing being kicked out of the military because he wasn't going to take the job, and how ultimately God worked this out for him.
	And I've had people tell me that over and over again, through emails, through letters.
	I've had people that I've met personally who have told me that, and none of them have any regret.
	They went through a difficult time, but they look at what has happened to some of the people who were browbeat into doing this and were injured or killed.
	And in many cases, People came out of this on the other side blessed way more than they were before that.
	An insurance agent that we have, he had a job that he was making over $300,000 a year.
	And his parents thought he was absolutely crazy to get out of it because he was not going to take the jab.
	And like, you take the jab or you leave.
	They said, I'm leaving.
	And he set up his own insurance company as an agent, right?
	He's an insurance agent.
	He's not an insurance company.
	But, you know, it was an agency that he was working for.
	It was very big, paying him a big salary.
	And he just started working for himself and he's making more money now than he did before.
	So what do we do about the election?
	And so this one person says, so do we just sit it out?
	Do we punish the GOP for its spinelessness and watch the Democrats dance on the ashes of our liberties and our country and our family?
	See, this is the false dichotomy that they always give you.
	This is Hegelian thinking.
	And they put you in this box.
	They tell you that you've only got two choices.
	And you believe them.
	These are the same people who demand to define the terms that we refer to everything as, right?
	These are the people who say, no, you're not pro-life.
	You're anti-abortion rights.
	Oh, okay.
	Uh, you're now going to be the red team when red always was a communist.
	So the communists now are in America are going to wear blue and you're going to wear red caps and call yourself red States and all the rest of this stuff.
	Oh, okay.
	Okay.
	And you've only got two choices.
	The only thing you can do to keep your, you know, you can either sit there and contemplate your navel and do absolutely nothing, or you can hold your nose and vote for Trump or else the Democrats are going to control the country.
	Well, that's a lie.
	That's a lie.
	Those are not your options.
	Don't let them put you in that box.
	The purpose of the election, and what these people don't understand, is that the election is to distract you from the things that you can do that really would make a difference.
	They don't want you doing those things.
	They want you focused on the fantasy.
	They want you focused on the pageant.
	They want you focused on the presidency.
	This is talking about Lala Harris.
	This person goes on to say, This is the same woman who with a straight face claims to stand for justice while championing policies that butcher the unborn and muzzle dissent.
	Okay, well, this is a woman who we all know that's what she is.
	She comes at you straight away.
	And flying her flag, wearing her Maoist costume, and wearing her Maoist policies all over her like a NASCAR driver and his corporate sponsors.
	Or you can have the guy who is incognito and subtle, secret, covert.
	He does things like gun control by executive order, and he does it with something that nobody cares about, bump stock.
	So he can establish a precedent to do gun control by executive order.
	Then he moves to the pistol brace.
	Then he pulls it off when somebody, when the NRA finally complains about it.
	And then Biden puts it in.
	But of course when he did it with the bump stock, Lala said, well I'll do that myself.
	But there's other ways to fight that.
	We had people who fought the pistol brace at the state level.
	We had people who removed the bump stock at the Supreme Court.
	See, I happen to think that's more dangerous to have somebody who is sneaky and subtle and covert and lying to your face.
	I think that's more dangerous.
	Quite frankly, I think it's more satanic, right?
	Satan was the most subtle of them all, right?
	I'm talking about the joy of living in a country where you can still proclaim the gospel freely, says this person.
	You know, you've got to vote for Trump so this will happen.
	Well, I don't know that Trump would defend that.
	So many things that you would think that he would have defended as a relabeled New York Democrat who now calls himself a Republican, but I don't know that he would make a difference with any of that stuff.
	But you could.
	If you paid any attention to what was happening in 2020, you know that all politics is local.
	You could make a difference with that.
	He says, here's a hard truth.
	Our vote is not just a political action.
	It's a moral one.
	Now, I agree with him.
	Now, I agree with him.
	So, it's about who you trust, isn't it?
	That's the real moral thing.
	It's not about which policies you agree with or whatever else.
	It's who do you trust.
	Are you going to trust Christ?
	Are you going to say, I know, and he does.
	He goes through all this stuff.
	He goes, yeah, I know that Trump's bad and his policies have been bad.
	But she's even worse.
	Well, you know what's right and wrong, and you can either do what's wrong or you can do what's right and leave the consequences to God.
	As I said before when I was talking about homeschooling, isn't it amazing that God has kept that door open with everything else that's going on?
	He's left that door open for you to raise your family, for you to protect your children, for you to train them up in the way they should go.
	But, you know, we've got to have Trump to do that, right?
	No.
	No, you've got to do it yourself.
	The important stuff, you have to do.
	And if you abdicate that, it's really a question of who do you trust and who you trust It's who you're looking to as your savior.
	It's just that simple.
	You have to do what is right.
	As I said before, when we talk about people who had religious objections to the vaccines, or even if they had a medical objection to the vaccine, or a constitutional objection to the vaccine, do the right thing, leave the consequences up to God.
	And yet, I'm seeing this one place after the other.
	Here is a guy, Who is talking about, this was put out by Gateway Pundit, Trump supporters, says this is a must-watch.
	A popular Christian YouTuber.
	Hmm, okay.
	I'm sure that Go back and look.
	I wonder what this guy was saying during the vaccine stuff, right?
	He's got a real large following on YouTube.
	I don't know.
	But anyway, his name is Alan Parr and he drops powerful video explaining why every believer should vote for Trump and Republican candidates.
	What does it mean to believe?
	You know, it's really about trust, right?
	Who do you trust?
	Who do you trust to take care of you?
	Well, you'll find out if you put your trust in a politician.
	Here's what he has to say, though.
	He doesn't think that character really matters.
	But before we get into such a triggering issue for some, I really, really need to lay down some ground rules and some disclaimers first for a video like this.
	First and foremost, no political party is perfect.
	Neither of them reflect a perfect biblical worldview.
	We need to make that very, very clear because some people may say, well, if you vote this way, then they're not perfect.
	And what about this?
	And what about that?
	Listen, neither party is perfect.
	Both parties are flawed.
	Nobody ever said otherwise.
	The second disclaimer is that neither person or neither candidate running for president is perfect.
	And for that reason, I know this is going to make some of you very, very angry, but I am not going to deal with the character of either candidate.
	Although that is a major issue and that is something that needs to be taken into consideration.
	And the reason why is because I personally believe that when you vote, you're not just voting for one person.
	You're voting for potentially hundreds, maybe even thousands of people.
	Yeah, right.
	Okay, so you notice the circular logic with that?
	Okay, first of all, political parties.
	No party is perfect.
	Well, nobody ever said anything about having a perfect political party.
	Nobody.
	That's never been an aspect of it.
	No party is perfect.
	And then character doesn't matter.
	Because you're not just voting for one person, you're voting for the party.
	So now we've looped back to number one.
	It's circular logic here.
	Let's come back, circle back up there.
	So you're not voting for a person, so forget about the character stuff.
	Because now I know that's important, but we're not going to talk about that here.
	And I'm not taking that into consideration when I talk about it.
	Well, if it's important, then why wouldn't you talk about it?
	You need to do something better than just point back to the party.
	Trust the party.
	It's just amazing to me.
	It's kind of what you hear from people all the time.
	Well, you know, I don't like abortion.
	Abortion needs to be stopped.
	But you know, in a perfect world, we wouldn't have any abortion.
	But since we don't live in a perfect world, people are going to have to have abortion.
	I just want to make it rare and safe.
	And now they want to worship it, right?
	Or they say the same thing.
	I really love the Second Amendment.
	The Second Amendment is great, but we've got to take your guns.
	Character is wonderful, but it doesn't matter.
	It's really important, but character doesn't matter.
	Look, perfection is not the issue.
	Here's what the issue is.
	The issue is principle.
	The issue is policy.
	The issue is prevarication.
	Let's just make three Ps out of it, right?
	Isn't that easy to remember?
	PPP.
	Payroll protection plan, or the private-public partnership.
	Well, we got another PPP.
	Principle, policy, and prevarication.
	If you don't have principles, you're not going to have the right policies.
	And if you're going to prevaricate about this stuff, we can't believe anything you say about your policy either, can we?
	Right?
	If you're going to lie to me about everything because you got no character like Trump and Lala, these people are all over the place, both of them.
	Two of the biggest chameleons and liars I've ever seen in my life.
	And I've been watching politics a long time.
	They lie about everything.
	And so what difference does it make what their policies are?
	The rest of this video is irrelevant because now he's going to fine tune.
	Well, you know, this is a little bit better than that.
	No, if you're going to discount character, Then you've got nothing to stand on.
	You have no reason to believe anything that they say about anything.
	So Gateway Pundit says, for par, supporting a pro-abortion candidate should be a moral deal-breaker for Christians.
	Well, again, we could argue about which one supports abortion more.
	And which one has a more dangerous approach.
	But still, how did we stop abortion?
	How did we stop abortion?
	We stopped it locally, didn't we?
	This is why, this is the only strategy that's ever worked.
	And this is why it was so important for Dobbs to come in and say, we're not going to determine this at the national level.
	And then immediately you've got a lot of national abortion, a lot of pro-life groups, as well as pro-abortion groups.
	that want to bring it back nationally.
	Okay, so the Supreme Court's not going to do it, so let's let Congress and the President bring it back to the federal government.
	No.
	We actually saved lives by making it at the state level.
	And again, some of the people say, well, okay, the number of abortions went from 60,000 in Tennessee and Texas to less than 50 in one year.
	And so, is that a win?
	I think so.
	Now, they will say, we are going to, we've actually, some of these places will say, well, actually, there's more total abortions that have happened this year because, you know, people are going to other places to have it done.
	Actually, more of it is being done by the abortion pill, which is being made readily available.
	there is something that the federal government could do about that.
	As long as they got the FDA around, as long as they got the post office around, there's something they could do about that.
	And that really would help women's health because letting them just be able to do this without seeing a doctor who is going to look at the size of the baby and other aspects.
	That presents a real threat to the mother's health.
	So they're not worried about women's health if they're going to let them take the abortion pill without a medical exam.
	So there are things like that that could be done.
	But look, that's primarily local.
	And that's how we've had success.
	And that was going to be the approach When Roe v. Wade came out, you had a lot of, after Roe v. Wade was done in 1973, you had a lot of conservatives say, this is a violation of the 10th Amendment, and it was.
	And that's eventually what, I said that all through this, that, you know, 10th Amendment nullifies Roe v. Wade.
	Roe v. Wade is not the law of the land, the 10th Amendment is.
	Finally, in the Dobbs decision, the Supreme Court said, the 10th Amendment doesn't allow us to do this.
	But the Constitution was on the side of stopping Roe v. Wade from the very beginning.
	And there was already a movement to do that after the Supreme Court decision in 1973.
	And they were putting that, there was building momentum.
	And then the moral majority got behind Ronald Reagan and said, we're going to do it with Ronald.
	He'll pack the Supreme Court and they'll undo Roe v. Wade.
	rather than having a nullification fight.
	In other words, the people who wanted marijuana, medical and recreational, put up more of a fight than the Christians who said they wanted to protect babies from abortion.
	They're willing to have that fight.
	They're willing to nullify it at the state level.
	But the conservatives weren't willing to do that for the babies.
	Let's take the easy way.
	We'll put Reagan in and he'll appoint Supreme Court justices like Sandra Day O'Connor, who Went the other way, or the others that he put in there.
	And so they thought that Reagan was God, and he's going to give them everything that they want, rather than doing the hard work themselves and protecting babies by nullifying this federal overreach at the state level.
	That's the way we protect our families.
	That's the way we protect life.
	That's what they don't want you doing.
	They want you focused on national politics.
	And so he's got a table here.
	If you can pull this up, Travis.
	This is the Gateway Pundit.
	And this is what Alan Parr put up.
	So he's got Democrat and Republican.
	National party politics.
	And he's got these things there.
	Redefining the family.
	Transitioning kids, religious freedom, abortion, school choice, judges, moral issues, and so forth, right?
	And so, look, it's really clear.
	You got to vote Republican all the way down the line.
	Well, let's make it a little bit more interesting.
	Let's put in some issues like lockdown.
	Let's put in medical murder and martial law, but murder through the ventilators and the vaccines.
	Well, I don't see a difference between the two parties on those two things.
	Do you?
	I see on those vital issues like lockdown, medical martial law, medical bioweapon murder, or murder by ventilator, I see that they're both for that.
	Wars, what about wars?
	I see they're both for wars.
	How about violating the constitution?
	How about civil asset forfeiture?
	How about, you know, these types of things that violate, surveilling us, the TSA, all the rest of these things, are both of them on that side?
	How about debt slavery?
	I think Republicans and Democrats are in the same position.
	How about Mark of the Beast, CBDC?
	Well, you got some Republicans who have taken the side of cryptocurrency, but they don't really, I don't trust them on Mark of the Beast either.
	And so when it comes to some of these other issues, so on those issues, I think those are pretty vital.
	We're talking about Mass murder and depopulation.
	We're talking about locking us down and enslaving us.
	We're talking about violating the Constitution that they swore to uphold.
	I think this is some pretty important issues.
	We talk about debt slavery by adding trillions of dollars a year.
	Conditioning people for universal basic income.
	I think those are pretty big issues and there's no difference between the Feds on that and the two different parties.
	But it all comes out to the definition of a family.
	Let me ask you this.
	Do you want the family defined by some politicians in Washington?
	No, I'm sorry, I don't think the Republican Party is up to that.
	I don't think they should be defining marriage, and I don't think they should be defining the family.
	And we don't need to have their permission to reject the pronouns.
	We don't need to have their permission to stop the mutilation of minors.
	We don't need to have their permission to stop gender gaslighting.
	It isn't going to happen, by the way, if we trust it to Washington to get done.
	If we want the National Republican Party to do that, to save the family for us, guess what?
	Family's going to be lost, like all the other things that we entrusted to the National Republican Party.
	The transitioning of children.
	The redefining of the family.
	How about religious freedom?
	What have the Republicans done for you lately when it comes to censorship and other things like that?
	Zero zip nada!
	They did nothing at all!
	When we go back to 2018 where they started mass purges on social media.
	Did they do anything?
	No!
	They didn't do anything about that.
	And then when it comes to abortion.
	I already talked about that.
	Well, we really stopped abortion.
	We stopped it in the States.
	Now, we're still doing it in New York and California and other places like that.
	You're going to stop them with a federal law?
	No, because you don't have the constitutional authority to stop them.
	It's just like drug prohibition.
	I don't like drug prohibition.
	I don't like the murder of babies, but these are state issues.
	And if you're not, if the state government Once people taking drugs and murdering babies, they will stand in the way because the purpose of the federal government is not to do law enforcement.
	And when they do that, they do it really poorly.
	When it comes to school choice, what does that mean?
	Does that mean the government subsidizing private schools?
	What about judges?
	How has that worked out for you?
	And then again, moral issues.
	Why in the world would anybody listen to some YouTuber who has a massive audience?
	Why?
	Because Google approves of what he says?
	And what he says is that Republicans are going to define moral issues for you.
	See, I don't have my moral issues defined for me by any political party or any politician.
	they're defined in the Bible. And so, if you want to do something about this, you have to fight this locally.
	All right.
	All politics is local and, and you have to fight it in your own family because the movies and the media and the schools and everything are going to be fighting against your family, trying to capture them everywhere.
	That's where your fight is folks.
	We don't wrestle against Democrats or Republicans.
	We wrestle against principalities and powers, and we have to take these thoughts captive here.
	You know, it truly is amazing.
	What about your character?
	Right?
	The character of the politicians doesn't matter, he says.
	But what about your character?
	What's your character based on?
	Michael Brown says, can a vote for Trump be morally justified?
	He says, in my 2020 book, he said evangelicals, it's called Evangelicals of the Crossroads.
	Will we pass the Trump test?
	He said, I devoted an entire chapter to the question, does character still count?
	Does morality still matter?
	Well, this guy thinks that character doesn't count and that the National Republican Party can fix our morality.
	This previous guy, I even forgot his name now.
	And he says, um, Back in 1998, in response, this is Michael Brown now, back in 1998, in response to the candidacy of Bill Clinton, the Southern Baptist Convention drafted a resolution in which it was stated clearly that, quote, moral character matters to God and should matter to all citizens, especially God's people, when choosing public leaders.
	They said that when the Democrat Bill Clinton was running, with his obvious moral failings.
	With a long list of women that Hillary Clinton called bimbos, who had alleged violent sexual misconduct and rape against Bill Clinton.
	And again, at the time, I saw liberals just say, that doesn't matter.
	It's like, really?
	You're supposed to be a defender of women?
	You say that women's rights matter and you just don't care about this kind of stuff?
	And the conservatives and the Southern Baptists were saying, tsk, tsk, look at the character that they are.
	And now it's been turned, hasn't it?
	And now we see the conservatives and many Southern Baptist leaders supporting Trump.
	A fellow party member of the Clintons and the Epstein The resolution urged, at the time, urged all Americans to embrace and act on the conviction that character does count in public office, and to elect officials and candidates who, although imperfect, demonstrate consistent honesty, moral purity, and the highest character.
	And so Michael Brown says, so how do we reconcile this with our support for Trump?
	And I write this as a two-time voter for Trump.
	He says, does he, although imperfect, demonstrate consistent honesty, moral purity, and the highest character?
	That's laughable.
	And he writes hardly.
	So how then can we justify our vote for him?
	That's why all these conservative Christians are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to explain how you can support that.
	He said, many have answered, we're electing a president, not a pastor or a priest.
	We're voting for a commander-in-chief, not a spiritual leader.
	I've heard the argument, well, we're voting for, if I got a plumber out there, I don't ask him if he's faithful to his wife or any of this other kind of stuff.
	It's like, okay, but if this guy is a, if he is a bona fide criminal, how do you know that he even fixed what you paid him to do or that he did it and he didn't do shortcuts and things that are going to blow up after he leaves or whatever?
	I mean, come on.
	Character matters for anything.
	But is this how we felt in the days before Trump?
	Did we use this same reasoning when Clinton was running for president?
	Weren't we saying that character counted, morality mattered, and haven't we been known as values voters?
	What values would those be?
	Didn't we once call ourselves the moral majority, he says.
	The Southern Baptist Convention Resolution stated, quote, tolerance of serious wrong by leaders.
	Such as depopulation shots, medical martial law, destroying businesses, destroying jobs, destroying people's lives, killing them, disabling them.
	Is that something that is wrong?
	I mean, we're not even talking about what's going on with Bill Clinton behind closed doors with women.
	We're talking about what Trump did out front to everybody.
	He put a kill shot around the world.
	How is that not character?
	Who paid him off?
	Do you care?
	No, you don't even care about the crime, let alone investigating it.
	So he says, they said at the time, that tolerance of serious wrong by leaders sears the conscience of the culture.
	It spawns unrestrained immorality and lawlessness in society, and it will surely result in God's judgment.
	Do we still believe that today?
	Or have we got our consciences, have they become totally seared by Trump?
	I think they have, quite frankly.
	That's a rhetorical question for Michael Brown.
	I'm telling you, it's true.
	The resolution also affirmed, quote, the moral character matters to God and should matter to all citizens, especially God's people when choosing public leaders, unquote.
	But today, when concerned Christians point to Trump's questionable morality, they're called legalists.
	They're called short-sighted.
	They're called religious.
	They're called, as I was called just two days ago, you're one of these purity guys.
	You're just so narrowly focused, you can't see what's important.
	That's why we have the kind of country we have today.
	No moral convictions.
	Everybody's playing this 40 chess game that Alex Jones was alluding to.
	What a deception that is.
	The book of Proverbs warns us about the deadly power of the tongue, about the damage a fool can do through his or her words.
	Fool refers to somebody who is morally bankrupt rather than somebody who is intellectually challenged.
	The last thing a nation wants is a fool for president or king.
	That would be somebody who defies God.
	Why then would we vote for Trump?
	When pressed further, On the issue, the answer would sound something like this.
	We still believe the character counts, morality matters, but things have become so extreme in America, blah, blah, blah.
	And you know what?
	This is, now he falls back, he lays out things, now he falls back into his Hegelian box.
	Well, here we are.
	We've only got two things that we can do.
	There's nothing I can do at the local level.
	There's nothing I can do as an individual or as a father or a parent.
	We're just going to have to, the only fix that we got for our society is to vote for Trump or Lala Harris.
	That's pretty clear, isn't it?
	Well, this is where you are.
	If you think like that.
	When politics becomes your religion, Robin Schumacher nailed it.
	Starts with a quote from C.S.
	Lewis.
	He says, C.S.
	Lewis in a book written over 80 years ago, The Screwtape Letters, talked about the dangers of letting politics become your religion.
	Lewis put the following words in the mouth of his professional devil uncle who was instructing a nephew on how to wreck his human target.
	He said, let your patient begin by treating patriotism or pacifism as part of his religion.
	Then let him, under the influence of partisan spirit, come to regard it as the most important part.
	"...then quietly and gradually nurse him on to the stage at which the religion becomes merely a part of the cause in which Christianity is valued chiefly because of the excellent arguments that it can produce." This is where we are with so many of the people who talk about Christian nationalism, with the Reawaken America people, with people like Michael Flynn.
	I mean, there's other people, even Richard Dawkins is there.
	Well, you know why.
	I don't like Islam in the UK, so I really like some of the fruit of Christianity, I just don't like the tree.
	So let's cut down the trees and keep the fruit.
	How long will that last?
	And our society, the moral aspects of our society have become like a cut flower, and it's been in the vase long enough that all the petals are falling off now.
	We can all pretty much see that it's dead, can't we?
	Too many professing Christians on both sides of the political aisle seem to be convinced that they're in the midst of a human life and death global existential battle.
	And if the other side, God forbid, wins, the result will be certain cataclysmic destruction on a national level.
	Sovereignty of God be darned, he says.
	Put it nicely.
	From MAGA and conservative disciples on the right to liberal social justice warriors on the left, there's no denying that shrieking quasi-religious political activism is everywhere.
	Cultural commentators debate on why it seems to be so severe and growing.
	Some say the ideological social media news echo chambers have cordoned us off into warring factions.
	That is true.
	That's what I was talking about earlier.
	Or the others point to a growing spiritual emptiness inside of people that they then try to feed with politics.
	That is also true.
	You can feed it with politics, the power side of things.
	Power can be, you can make an idol out of power even if you don't have it, just like you can make an idol out of money even if you don't have it.
	You can make an idol out of sex if you don't have it either, right?
	Or you can indulge yourself in any and all of those things and make idols out of them.
	To them, political conventions can have an identical vibe to a raucous and joyous church worship.
	A candidate's inspiring speech worms the heart just like a fiery evangelist's, and they dole out the funds to the political campaigns, like they drop the money into the bucket of the church.
	I just saw a thing from a megachurch pastor, and his whole thing was, don't criticize these churches of 40-50,000 people, you know?
	If you do, if you ever go to a concert, if you ever go to a football game or anything like that, well then you're just a hypocrite because you're going to these big things, these big events anyway.
	And it's like, well, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
	I don't go to a concert, a live concert, thinking that I'm going to have a relationship with the other people in the audience.
	I've got a one-to-one relationship with this performance.
	Are you saying that's what you're doing at the megachurch?
	Because I'm saying that's what you're doing.
	Same thing is true of the football thing.
	I don't go to a football game thinking I'm going to get on the field participating.
	And yet, it is a spectator sport when we go to these mega churches.
	To most of the churches.
	Most of them, you're not actually a participant in it.
	So, again, the best experiences I've ever had have been a local, a neighborhood Bible study that we'd meet in the house.
	That was the best that we had.
	That was not a mega church experience.
	It was not a mega concert experience.
	It was not a political event.
	It wasn't a MAGA political rally either.
	Whether religious or political, sectarianism is about two hostile identity groups who not only clash over policy and ideology, but who see the other side as alien and immoral, writes Nate Cohn of the New York Times.
	It's still the antagonistic feelings between the groups more than the differences over ideas that drive sectarian conflict.
	See, this is the path to civil war.
	We get to the point where it's more important for us to own the other people than for us to try to fix a problem.
	Even if we disagree on problems, we don't want to talk about the issues, we just want to own that other guy.
	We don't want to debate any issues, we don't want to shut down any debate, censor any debate.
	We want to own those other people.
	Two things have typically occurred inside a person when this type of thing happens.
	Number one, the primary object of deliverance from societal problems is the government, not the creator.
	People are tired of waiting on God to make things right.
	Isn't that what I said at the beginning?
	So I said, I think this guy got it exactly right.
	I agree with him, anyway.
	Number two, scripture has been discarded as absolute truth and moral authority.
	Even character doesn't count, as you heard that so-called Christian influencer.
	When cultural values clash with the Bible, the culture wins.
	When you add politics, to your relationship with God, and that's a new Christian nationalism.
	You mix these two things together, guess what you wind up with?
	Politics.
	Listen to what historian Antonia Tripolitas had to say about the Roman world.
	He said, The general populace no longer placed its hope or faith on the ancient gods, whom they believed could not alleviate their daily encounters with the vicissitudes of Hellenistic life.
	This is a period of general material and moral insecurity.
	Let's let this go.
	I'm almost finished with this.
	Okay, pause that for a second.
	The unsettling conditions of the time led people to long and to search for salvation.
	A release from the burdens of finitude, the misery and the failure of human life.
	People everywhere were keenly aware to every new message of hope and eagerly prospecting for a personal savior.
	Someone who would bring salvation, deliverance, or protection from the vicissitudes of this life.
	He says, does that sound familiar?
	And so he said, ask yourself some questions about this.
	That's why I wanted to extend this just briefly.
	Here's about five questions.
	Do I find myself witnessing more about Biden, Lala Harris, Donald Trump, etc.
	than I do about Jesus Christ?
	Do I feel the country is doomed more if the wrong people are elected versus if the nation rejects God and His truth?
	If the wrong people are elected, is that a bigger risk to your nation than if we turn our back on God?
	Do I view those opposing political side as enemies?
	Versus people to be listened to, and one for Christ.
	Do I enjoy thinking about the defeat of my political opponents?
	Oh yeah, we gotta collect the tears of those liberals, and make them wail, and we gotta own them, and all the rest of the stuff.
	I am sick of that, frankly.
	I am so sick of that.
	When I imagine how God's higher purposes can be accomplished, do my thoughts immediately turn to political parties?
	And to politicians?
	Are my political views, practically speaking, a key aspect of my identity?
	Do I think that God is on my side politically and opposed to those who disagree with me?
	If so, you may have already been captured by the enemy.
	Screwtape describes this to his disciples.
	He says, once you have made the world an end and faith as a means, you've almost won.
	And it makes very little difference what kind of worldly end your man is pursuing.
	Provided that meetings and pamphlets and policies and movements and causes and crusades matter more to him than prayers and sacraments and charity, well, then he is ours.
	Because the battle is spiritual.
	It's not political.
	You have a choice that you can make.
	And the ballot box doesn't matter.
	Not at the federal level.
	It does at the local level.
	And they don't want you to make a difference.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Goodbye.
	you They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲