Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 28, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:33

The David Knight Show - 08/28/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds It's really cool.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 28th of August, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at the amazing lies about climate.
	And we have some people who are working very hard.
	Washington Post put out like a 25-page article about how they're working on re-engineering the cow's stomach.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	Maybe it's really about killing our cattle supply, isn't it?
	Maybe what we should do is get rid of the people who are trying to destroy our lives.
	We're gonna take a look at all the climate stuff, chemtrails included.
	Why did they just have snow in California if we got global warming?
	Why is just the southwest Pacific Ocean rising, but it's not rising in other parts of the Pacific Ocean.
	I mean, it's unbelievable.
	We'll take a look at the Lala flip-flops, and we'll take a look at the free speech billionaires.
	Isn't it amazing?
	All these billionaires who run our free speech.
	From Musk, to Durov, to Zuckerberg, and on and on.
	Yeah, it's all about freedom, isn't it?
	We'll be right back.
	I want to talk a little bit about climate, and then I want to talk about the dollars and nonsense that is following up on this, because the electric, electricity rates are exploding across the country.
	From Tennessee to New York and beyond, right?
	To infinity and beyond is where the, where the electric rates are going.
	But, you know, one interesting thing I found out I did not know was just how secretive And closed about raising the rates the TVA is, Tennessee Valley Authority.
	It's federal and that explains everything.
	Federal government keeps everything secret.
	Even when you've got a so-called public utility.
	California is seeing a winter wonderland in summer for the first time in 20 years.
	Unusually strong and rare snow storms dusted the Sierra Nevada mountain range early on Saturday.
	From blistering heat waves and raging wildfires to snow.
	That's how the song White Christmas begins.
	It's how the movie begins as well, right?
	He's in sunny LA.
	Never been such a day.
	Yosemite has not seen August snow for at least 20 years, said the National Weather Service.
	Did you notice that?
	20 years.
	Oh, well, it's unprecedented.
	No, it's not unprecedented.
	They had it 20 years ago.
	It's rare, you know.
	It's a fact, you would say.
	They want you to believe that the weather that's happening now has never happened before anywhere else, but it has happened.
	Snow fell at Mammoth Mountain at Palisades Tahoe Ski Resorts.
	The rare summer snowstorm nonetheless caused a record amount in rainfall in other places, in Stockton, Redding, Red Bluff, and so forth.
	And then of course they have the usual California wildfires that are out there.
	And so the Atlantic Ocean is suddenly cooling, and the so-called scientists of climate, the prophets of doom, it's called that P-R-O-F-I-T-S, they are baffled.
	And this is an excellent graphic.
	Pull this down, show this, the headlines here.
	This is from Zero Hedge.
	We've reached the boiling of seas.
	Boiling the ocean, says the Atlantic, and we've reached the boiling seas part of climate crisis, says MSNBC.
	USA Today says hot Atlantic Ocean temperatures fuel hurricane season.
	The Vox says this chart of ocean temperatures should really scare you.
	And then, shortly after that, the Atlantic is cooling mysteriously fast rate after a record warmth.
	Oh, no one can figure out why the Atlantic Ocean is cooling at a record speed.
	What happened to this existential threat of boiling oceans?
	I am so sick and tired.
	How do people take these liars seriously?
	These false prophets of doom.
	I've been watching these chicken littles of the environmental thing since the 1970s.
	And I know what their agenda was.
	The same people leading them were the ones who were pushing depopulation in the 1960s and continue to push depopulation because that's the point of all of this stuff.
	That's the point of the MacGuffin.
	The point of the MacGuffin is to put you into neo-feudalism if you survive.
	They want to reduce the number of people because they want those who remain to be slaves in a feudal system.
	And it's pretty hard to control 8 billion people when you try to enslave them.
	Somehow they're not going to be able to tamp that down.
	So they need to kill a lot of people.
	So, you can look at it and say, well, is the end goal slavery or mass murder?
	Yes, both, actually.
	So, what is happening to the ocean?
	This is very much like what we had with the floods of Venice.
	They really played that up.
	Oh, look at this.
	You know, Venice is just... And then, shortly after that, they had pictures of the canals.
	They were completely dry.
	The boats sitting on a dry canal bed.
	So what's going on with that?
	Oh, well, now it's a drought.
	First it was high water, now it's a drought, and so forth.
	I mean, they can't keep their narrative straight.
	But whatever happens, they will try to claim it for their agenda.
	Al Gore goes on an unhinged rant about rain bombs, boiled oceans, and other climate threats at Davos.
	And that just happened.
	And so, actually that was 2022, but he does it all the time.
	How do you keep track of it, you know?
	Let's bring it out and vamp it again.
	If these cold conditions persist to the end of August, a phenomenon known as Atlantic Niña may be declared, wrote Noah, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
	Over the past seven days we have seen cooling of water in the Gulf as well as a large portion of the Atlantic.
	Imagine that.
	Weather changes.
	Yeah.
	And so we have an AI model that is now going to explore the effects of chemtrails.
	And Exposé News in the UK says, well, that's embarrassing because the Guardian was just pushing really hard to attack Reform Party members.
	They're a bunch of unhinged conspiracy theorists.
	Before the UK general election, The Guardian published an article accusing members of Reform UK of promoting conspiracy theories, like chemtrails.
	And Expose News says, embarrassingly for The Guardian, just a couple months later, a global leader in artificial intelligence released a chemtrail emulator, an online tool that anyone can use to see the effects of chemtrails.
	I remember that was the thing that really would set off Paul Joseph Watson in for wars.
	He really didn't want to talk about chemtrails.
	It's like, well, there's a lot of pictures of what's going on with chemtrails, for example, like this.
	So explain that as a natural cloud formation that keeps happening.
	Or take a look at this.
	There's another one.
	You call it persistent contrails, whatever you want to call it.
	But there was an app that some people put together along with a documentary film about 2013.
	It was called Skyder Alert.
	And they had done a documentary about chemtrails, and then they had this free app, and with it what you could do is you could take a picture of the sky when that type of thing was happening, and you could send it to your congressional representative, or your state representative, and of course a copy would go to them.
	And as they started looking at it, they noticed that whenever this was happening, the temperature would go up in certain areas.
	Now, some people believe that what they're doing, I guess it depends on The type of stuff that they're spraying.
	Sometimes they're spraying things, and this is what was in the AI model, modeling the idea that they would put reflective substances there to reflect the light.
	Or you could have something else, and it could get trapped there.
	And of course, here's some more pictures.
	I'll play you one more of these before we jump into what is happening and what the Guardian is actually doing.
	I would not intentionally spray my children or family with toxic aerosols, but as you must know, 80% or better do not have any family or children.
	Indigo pilots are chosen from the top ranks within the Air Force, Navy, and Coast Guard.
	Most of the pilots are, quote, hardened to humanity.
	That is not a contrail.
	And could care less about killing off unwanted or leeching aspects of America and the world.
	I swear to you, the majority of the pilots who like machines, I call them tanker terminators.
	We are paid more than any other pilot for our service, other than Air Force One pilots, who make as much or more, and are kept in a dark secret world for their own protection.
	Turned up the 92-3-0?
	Down to 60-92, officer.
	Can you say speed?
	Is that the time?
	Down to 60-92.
	Yeah, well, you know, maybe the Guardian can explain that, but in the meantime, you've got a guy who is one of the recognized leaders in artificial intelligence, Andy Ng, I guess is the way you pronounce his name, N-G.
	It depends on which Asian nation you're from, but if you're not from an Asian nation, it stops you in your tracks when you try to pronounce the name.
	We'll go with the Ng pronunciation.
	He is creating an online tool That allows anyone to tinker with the dials of a solar geoengineering model exploring what might happen if nations attempt to counteract climate change by spraying reflective particles in the atmosphere.
	And again, you know, what you spray in the atmosphere is going to make it cool or make it get hotter.
	And a good example of that is a volcano.
	If a volcano is over land, as we've seen over and over again, Krakatoa east of Java, when it shoots up from land, that kind of material, okay, dust, what it does is it leads to cooling.
	When Krakatoa happened in the mid-1800s, it caused a little, a mini ice age for two or three years of cooling.
	Even in England it was recorded.
	But then if you have something like we just did in Hunga, Recently, you had a massive underwater volcano, and what that did was that increased the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere by 10%.
	Water vapor in the atmosphere is almost all of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
	There's only a trace amount of CO2.
	Again, 0.04%.
	0.04% 0.04% 4 1 hundredths of 1% and the man-made part of that is only 3% of that And And so when you look at, you know, now they're saying, well, methane.
	0.04%.
	So we've got to get rid of the cows and so forth.
	Well, the vast majority of it is water vapor.
	And they say, well, there's nothing we can do about that because we live on a water planet.
	And so you're not talking about a 10% increase in CO2, which is still being negligible.
	But you're talking about a 10% increase in the major gas that's in the atmosphere, which is water.
	So, volcano, depending on whether it is dust that is putting up, or whether it's water vapor that is putting up, can either lead to cooling or to heating.
	And so, with these chemtrails, same thing is true.
	Andrew Ng is a recognized leader in AI, founder of deeplearning.ai, founder and CEO of Landing AI, general partner at the AI Fund, chairman and co-founder of Coursera, and an adjunct professor at Stanford University.
	He thinks it's interesting to model geoengineering, and of course they've been talking about this for some time.
	Over a decade ago, back in 2013, I covered the geoengineering conference that was happening that year.
	It happens every year.
	And as an example, I talked about one particular paper that was presented.
	And the paper was, who gets to set the thermostat?
	They weren't talking about whether they could do it or how to do it.
	They knew they could do it.
	They knew how to do it.
	They said they hadn't done it yet.
	But then the point was, but who gets to set the thermostat?
	Maybe the Russians want it warmer.
	And maybe some people in southern climates want it cooler.
	How do we set the thermostat?
	That was their only concern.
	Who gets to make that decision?
	So the concept of solar geoengineering was born from the realization that the planet has cooled after massive volcanic eruptions, says the MIT Technology Review.
	That's right.
	Or if it's a water volcano, it heats up.
	The goal of Ing's emulator, called Planet Parasol, is to invite more people to think about solar engineering.
	This is predictive programming.
	They want to tell you they're not doing it now, of course, and they've never done it in the past.
	But here, get used to the idea.
	You want to play with this little simulator?
	You too!
	can be the global emperor.
	You can be the one who sets the thermostat on the planet.
	How about that?
	You can play with your little simulator here.
	One person responded to that.
	Thomas Van Eden says, the arrogance is astounding.
	And he gets four points.
	The first one he says, those who believe that humans are anyway part of the global earth climate, cause and effect cycle, live in their office-based tiny world, and they've never witnessed the vastness of reality.
	That nails it right there.
	You know, talk about people who are, you know, they say, well, humanity is just too geocentric.
	We think the entire universe revolves around the Earth.
	Well, maybe.
	How do you know it doesn't?
	I mean, you're a physicist.
	Physicists thrive on uncertainty.
	That's how they get their grants.
	So who knows what the universe revolves around, or if it revolves at all.
	But they're always talking about geocentric ideas, and anthrocentric ideas, man-centered ideas, and yet that's what they are.
	But they don't even get out to see the vastness of the Earth, the Geo.
	They're centered in their little office, and it truly is ignorance as well as arrogance.
	Number two, if our Earth requires human intervention to save itself, then we're doomed.
	We probably deserve it.
	Number three, given that the sun, the largest energy source in our climate system, has cyclic output and variations, it would have the most significant impact and there's nothing we can do to alter that.
	I have been called over and over again an idiot and a lunatic for making that argument.
	You know, just look at how minor variations in the Sun, just look, the very thing that they're trying to do with geoengineering is what?
	Is try to interfere with the Sun's setting of our climate.
	They know the Sun is setting our climate, that's why they're putting up the geoengineering.
	And minor variations in the tilt of the earth is what gives us our seasons.
	I mean, they have absolutely no control over the solar cycles.
	They don't even know when they're coming.
	But whenever something like that that's natural happens, they always blame it on us, because they've got an agenda to take things away from us, including our lives.
	And fourth, the real scientists out there should feel ashamed for allowing a small, diluted group... No, they're not diluted, they're bought.
	Bought.
	A bought group of researchers seeking grants to make you all appear like amateurs.
	What happened to testing and hypothesizing?
	They used to be the way that science explored how the world works.
	Seems now you can hire a scientist to prove a preconceived idea and nobody speaks out.
	Exactly.
	Just take a look at virology.
	Just take a look at the pandemic.
	They don't have to test anything.
	They don't even, you know, they're at the level of a hypothesis.
	They don't even get to the level of a theory, let alone a proven fact.
	And so it really is at a hypothesis.
	They don't have to show you their data.
	They don't have to test anything.
	And we're talking about the climate people as well as the pandemic people.
	That's the essence of the MacGuffin.
	Don't look too carefully at this.
	Focus, you know, they want to focus On something else.
	It's just the Maltese Falcon they want you chasing at the moment.
	Two months before the UK general election, the Guardian published an article.
	COVID chemtrails and climate.
	The wild ideas spread by reform UK candidates.
	They sound pretty grounded actually to me.
	It's kind of like what we just saw that NBC reporter say to JD Vance.
	Well, you know, RFK says that we've got an autism epidemic.
	Yeah, we do.
	Uh, that school shootings are really happening because of SSRI, pretty much every single one.
	Uh, and that, uh, 9-11 was, uh, not what the government says it was.
	And J.D.
	Vance says, well, I don't agree with any of that.
	Yeah.
	Let me, let me tick off all the boxes for the Peter Thiel's of the world and the Donald Trump's of the world.
	I want to serve those billionaires so I can be one of them someday.
	So they've said, reform party have been found to post conspiracy theories and other fringe ideas online.
	Imagine that.
	And expose news says, well, if you read the list that they put together, you'd be hard pressed to find one that isn't true.
	That's right.
	But you can.
	You can easily find a politician who will agree that everything that's true is a lie.
	So why did the Guardian lie so blatantly?
	Well, the Guardian Media Group, which owns the Guardian and the Observer in the UK, is owned by a British company, the Scott Trust Limited.
	It's claimed that the Trust's ownership structure ensures that any financial gains go into journalism rather than into the shareholders' pockets.
	However, As Wikispooks notes, Scott Trust Limited is controlled by people predominantly from banking and venture capital and marketing, which perhaps explains why the Guardian's well-documented expertise in offshore tax avoidance schemes.
	In 2015, award-winning British journalist Jonathan Cook published an article titled, HSBC and the Sham of the Guardian's Scott Trust
	And he also referenced an article by Nafeez Ahmad, and his article says his latest lengthy, wide-ranging, and crowdfunded investigation into how HSBC Bank and the City of London are deeply implicated in money laundering, the proceeds of globalized crime, and how that same financial sector has captured not only Britain's political elites, but the entire British media.
	Yes, the entire media, including the Guardian, said Cook.
	We've seen this for quite some time.
	As a matter of fact, HSBC, Hong Kong Shanghai Bank, right?
	They've been around since the opium wars.
	And, you know, the British colonizers I saw were Gladstone, who was British Prime Minister in Victorian times for quite some time.
	He's persona non grata because of slavery.
	And yet his position, his dad owned slavery when he was newly elected to Parliament.
	He was dragging his feet on some of the reform measures that were being pushed by William Wilberforce, but he eventually came around to that.
	And he eventually enacted, after slavery was ended by the efforts of William Wilberforce, and the slaves were paid for and freed in Jamaica and the Caribbean, he introduced bills that would penalize
	Company or countries that used slave labor to process and create sugar and That led to Spain and other countries stopping slavery themselves for economic purposes So they they used economic pressure on them.
	However at that same time and and Gladstone fought against it the British companies then turned from slavery to the opium wars in China and And using drugs to control the Chinese people, to control the trade that was there, and making a tremendous profit, drug dealing.
	And it was in that environment that HSBC was born.
	Now Gladstone fought that, opposed it, and eventually got that shut down.
	But again, it was massive corporate interests.
	You know, slavery, and slavery to drugs as well.
	Perhaps as bad a slavery as the other kind was.
	It was a few years ago when Eric Holder, the Attorney General for Obama, decided that he was not going to come after HSBC and some other big banks.
	JPMorgan has been found guilty, fined billions of dollars, and it was just a tiny slap on the wrist for the crimes that they had done.
	But they've been found guilty multiple times, and so has HSBC.
	HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels.
	Who would have thought?
	For drug cartels as well as for terrorist organizations, they got caught and they got a small fine.
	And then they were told to set up a new program and hire a bunch of people to inspect this.
	And Whistleblower, I interviewed him a couple of times.
	He actually ran for Congress later, but you know, honest people don't stand a chance.
	He was brought on, he said, they hired all of us to look at the transactions, kind of oversee them and investigate.
	So none of us had an investigatory background.
	And none of them really took it seriously, but he did.
	And so he started educating himself about it.
	He started looking at it.
	And what he found was that in their database where they're searching for terms, they had terms of individuals and organizations and places and stuff like that, that would be flagged.
	And then these guys would investigate it.
	He said he found that in the database they had done things like they'd put a space in front of the name or after the name or they'd put a period there.
	Something that was very subtle that you had to look closely to see it.
	But of course it would be a no match for the way the computer program was.
	And I think his name was Everett Stern if I remember correctly.
	He blew the whistle on it and they got convicted again.
	And so, uh, and then got another slap on the wrist.
	Eric Holder justified that by saying they're too big to, to jail, essentially, you know, they had been too big to fail during the 2008, 2009 crisis.
	Now they're too big to jail for repeated money laundering.
	And so it was Matt Taibbi who reported that on Rolling Stone, excellent article, pointed out that HSBC, it wasn't just that, they had set up their own window for the Sinaloa drug cartel where they could bring in massive stacks of cash and they could process the cash for them.
	It was just getting to where it tied up the bank for everybody else.
	They were bringing in so much cash that they gave them their own window to help expedite it.
	See, they're good at what they do.
	So yeah, so the Guardian wants you to believe that, yeah, there is no chemtrails happening.
	And then here's this article I was talking about, about re-engineering the cow's stomach.
	And it's from, where else?
	The Washington Post.
	And it is utter nonsense, folks.
	And I say that with two Ds, not two Ts.
	So it's a very, very long article, how they're going to re-engineer cow stomachs, because they know better than God.
	They began by talking about the experiences of Sushi, a four-year-old calf, at the start of a genetic engineering experiment in California.
	Scientists here are hunting for a way to transform Sushi's gut.
	So that he no longer releases planet warming methane.
	Um, this is a fart farce.
	Okay.
	That's what I'm saying.
	Unicorn farts, cow farts.
	This is not what we don't have to worry about this stuff.
	We should laugh at them.
	We should ridicule them.
	As a matter of fact, you know, as Saul Alinsky said, Ridicule is the most effective weapon.
	So let's ridicule these people about their fart farces and about their unicorn farts and about this narrative that anything that they want to control, anything they want to use to kill us or to impoverish or to enslave us, well, that's affecting the climate.
	Or it's something that is part of the virus pandemic.
	Let's expose these lies.
	Let's laugh them, these naked tyrants need to be laughed out of the public square.
	Cattle, one of the most consumed creatures on the planet, produce enormous amounts of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas responsible for 30% of global warming.
	Where were they when the buffalo were roaming North America and so on?
	Come on.
	So they claim, forget about the sun, forget about the sun variants, forget about volcanoes, forget about anything that's natural.
	Oh, it's the cows now.
	And you notice that this is a new thing.
	Did they just now realize that it's the cows?
	Or are they focusing on the cows because their agenda is to get rid of meat and dairy?
	See, this is something new, right?
	We've had these idiots out there who told us for a decade, first decade of climate change, They were going into an ice age.
	Then abruptly they did a full 180 like Lala Harris has done on so many different issues.
	And now we're not going to have an ice age.
	No, now we're going to have global warming.
	And the oceans are going to boil, except when they don't.
	And so these people have never changed what they want to do in terms of humans.
	But now they're coming after food.
	And now they're coming after cows.
	That's a new thing.
	It was always, before, it was about cars and things like that, but now they want cows.
	I guess they'll come after horses, too, because they don't want us to move.
	So, if they succeed, these people who are re-engineering the cow because they know better than God, if they succeed, they could wipe out the world's largest human-made source of methane and help to change the trajectory of planetary warming.
	Yeah, they're going to kill the cows.
	When they kill the cows, not the methane.
	It is completely out of the box.
	Said a professor of animal science at UC Davis.
	Nobody has done it before.
	Isn't this wonderful?
	This is great.
	These people are as deranged as Elon Musk and his... We're creating new horrors all the time.
	I know.
	I don't like horror films or sci-fi films anymore.
	I'm living on many.
	Anyway, there are approximately 1.5 billion cattle on the planet.
	Their digestive system is nothing short of miraculous, says the Washington Post.
	Well, because it was designed by God, not some genetic scientist at UC Davis.
	Their digestive system is miraculous.
	Would you expect anything other than a miraculous digestive system when God designs it?
	Would you expect anything other than some kind of a Boeing airplane digestive system if it's designed by UC Davis?
	Nothing short of right.
	They can survive on grass, corn, alfalfa.
	But also on the battered byproducts of human crops around hulls, corn husks, even sawdust!
	And we want to make sure that doesn't happen anymore.
	This miraculous design by God lets them survive even on sawdust.
	No, we don't want to have that.
	Because they want to starve us.
	We're the target.
	The cows just between us and them.
	Currently responsible for about 4% of global warming according to Food and Agriculture Organization.
	That's utter nonsense.
	Keep the cows, kill the NGOs.
	25 page article.
	I'm not going to cover any more of this in detail because it is farcical.
	Just quote, we should have the Chick-fil-A cow standing up holding a sign and quoting Benjamin Franklin, fart proudly.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Music playing.
	Thelma Heng If You Water the Plants Ph хочу confessar que
	Felicidad Mallart
	You're listening to The David Knight Show!
	I'm fine.
	you They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	Thank you for listening.
	what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidNightShow.com Alright, now I just want to thank everybody who has supported us this month.
	We're still a bit low.
	We haven't updated the gas gauge.
	We're not quite at three quarters yet.
	We're probably about around 70%, and we've got, I think, today and tomorrow left.
	So we're quite a ways behind, but I want to thank those of you who have supported the program.
	We have quite a few people who have supported us for the first time.
	But it's always in a state of flux, and I understand it's a difficult time.
	We've tried to make the program free for people in case they are in a difficult financial system.
	We're in a difficult system, that's for sure.
	Situation, I should say.
	But we understand if that is the case.
	Uh, if you're able to support the program and you do watch it, uh, we would appreciate your support and could certainly use it.
	And I want to thank on rumble Jim Z seven.
	Thank you very much.
	So it was a good morning nights of the round table.
	Thank you very much.
	Um, yeah, we got a place at that table, don't we?
	Um, but, uh, if you'd like to support us, you can go to the day of a night show.com.
	First of all, it shows where you can get the, um, uh, the, um, The program, all the different places that we've got it, both video and audio, as well as audio only podcasts.
	And it has links to the video sites we have at BitChute and Rumble and Odyssey and YouTube.
	Travis posts those up each day.
	Also, where you can find us on social media, where you can join us live as you're maybe listening at this point in time.
	Maybe you're listening to the recording.
	Also links to where you can find the podcasts, because sometimes it can be difficult to find us.
	And then there are links to how you can support us.
	If you'd like to sign up on a regular basis on Subscribestar, or if you want to just make individual contributions, we have people do that on a regular basis on Zelle.
	Zelle is good because there's no fees on Zelle.
	Cash app or a PO box.
	If you would like to send us something by mail.
	We appreciate all of your support.
	Let's talk a little bit about how this climate thing is rolling out in terms of the dollars and nonsense that is out here.
	What it's going to cost us.
	In the UK The organization formerly known as a church, the Church of England, they're dropping church now.
	I guess they're just going to be of England.
	They may not have any aspirations to be a church, but they have aspirations to get to net zero by 2030.
	And so the vicars are being told that they should give the congregation blankets instead of heating the churches.
	Wait a minute, I thought we were going into global warming.
	I can't make up their mind.
	Is it going to get cold or is it going to get hot?
	Well, they're going to, you know, I guess maybe they don't believe it.
	Let them eat cake, you know, and then let them shiver in the place formerly known as a church.
	Because now that church has a 2030 net zero gold.
	They said the mantra is now, they got a mantra too, I guess.
	The mantra is now heat the people.
	Not the space.
	I think they've got an extra letter.
	I think it's eat the people.
	Eat the people, mother.
	It's soylent grain.
	Well, you know, that shouldn't be too difficult if you want to heat the people, because the so-called or formerly known as Church of England is getting fewer and fewer people.
	I think by 2030, they're going to have net zero people, I think is what that is going to be at that institution.
	But this is a plan for when hell freezes over.
	That's what you're going to find at the C of E. New York is going to be paying $155 per megawatt hour.
	So how does that compare?
	Well, it's about five times the current rate.
	Right now they're paying $36 per megawatt hour.
	They'll be paying $155 per megawatt.
	What's changed?
	Oh, well, we're going with the green energy sources.
	This is another part of the MacGuffin.
	We're going to ban internal combustion engine cars.
	And you're going to buy the electric cars from us that are going to be way more expensive.
	We're going to ban the meat and dairy, and you're going to eat bugs, and you're going to pay as much for the bugs or more than you paid for meat and dairy in the past.
	And we're going to ban fuel.
	And you're going to be paying way more, five times more, for wind and for solar.
	And isn't that poetic?
	Because we're told that we have Global warming because of cow farts.
	Now they go to wind power.
	Somehow they should be able to close the loop on that, you know, like recycle the cow farts into wind power.
	Two large wind farms around New York, one of them called Empire Wind.
	Isn't that convenient?
	Because they're building a financial empire.
	This is a massive transfer of wealth from us to a few people, just as the so-called pandemic was globally.
	It's all about a massive transfer of wealth, and that's, you know, what the climate MacGuffin is about, it's what the pandemic MacGuffin is about, it's about a wealth transfer.
	So Empire Wind and Sunrise Wind, it's off the coast of Long Island.
	The projects are expected to begin in 2026 and 2027.
	Forget about your view anymore.
	Just hope that they're far enough away That the pressure variations aren't going to cause any ill effects for you.
	The power will be delivered to Brooklyn and to Long Island.
	The state will pay between $146 and $155 per megawatt hour, at least four times the average grid cost over the last year.
	States agree to pay wind power operators based on the project's break-even cost.
	You see, they're guaranteed.
	Just like the pharmaceutical companies.
	They're guaranteed.
	Right?
	We're going to hold you harmless for any harm that you do.
	And we're going to make sure that you make a profit.
	And they're going to do the same thing with their partners in this as well.
	Such corrupt fascism and fraud, isn't it?
	The offshore wind business off the East Coast is in turmoil, however.
	Operators have canceled projects from Massachusetts to Maryland that were due to be constructed in the next four years.
	Some of them have been delayed, while others have renegotiated their contracts at prices that are 30 to 50 percent higher than originally promised.
	Every offshore wind farm expects to take advantage of investment or production tax credits Under the inflation reduction act.
	Yeah.
	How do you reduce inflation when you're printing money and spending money that you don't have?
	Yeah.
	Biden and Harris.
	And so this is massive subsidies that they put into the inflation reduction act, because again, they don't believe that deficits matter.
	That's the whole thesis of modern monetary theory.
	Uh, we just spend all the money that we want and, and then if inflation takes off, We raise taxes on our enemies.
	You know, we give money to our friends, and then if inflation starts, then we raise taxes on our enemies.
	That's it in a nutshell.
	So the deal, thanks to Biden and the Democrats in New York State, will pay $155 to $146 per megawatt hour from these two companies.
	And the owner-operators of these two farms, Equinor for Empire and Ørsted for Sunrise are two of the top five global wind farm investors and operators.
	Equinor is Norway's state oil company, while Ørsted previously was Denmark's oil company.
	Notice this?
	It's the oil companies getting into the so-called renewables and the foreign oil companies.
	I mean, we're not even going to give that money to Exxon or Mobil, right?
	Because that would be too obvious.
	So let's give it to the oil companies of Norway and Denmark, and nobody will know what's going on.
	So I remember when we were in the transition period for Trump.
	And it was rumored that he was going to put Rex Tillerson, formerly of Exxon, CEO in.
	And I said, this guy is one of the biggest green grifters out there.
	And I was just attacked all over social media.
	I said, not only that, but he's a, uh, he's a leader of the pedophile movement.
	He was there at the boy Scouts leading, leading the boy Scouts as they moved into, uh, pedophilia.
	And so, you know, pushing, well, let's put homosexuals into scouting, you know, first as leaders, then as other scouts.
	And the reason you don't do that, and the reason you had Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, is because you never know what's going to happen.
	You're doing the best that you can to try to minimize the risks.
	And so, since same-sex was a minority to heterosexual activity, then that makes sense.
	You're going to try to minimize the risk of sexual abuse.
	By putting people that statistically are not going to be attracted to the kids.
	That's why you would have women running Girl Scouts and on and on.
	It's just common sense.
	But anyway, I talked about this.
	I said he's a pedophile and he's a green grifter.
	And boy, was I attacked.
	Because, you know, hey, he's fine.
	This is somebody that Donald Trump has picked.
	What's the matter with you?
	Don't you realize this is Donald Trump's pick?
	This is a guy who is running an oil company.
	You're an idiot.
	You don't know anything about him.
	Yeah.
	You don't know that it's the oil companies that have invested in the ground floor, just like Gates has invested in the ground floor of bugs.
	And then he pushes to eliminate meat and dairy.
	The oil companies invested in the ground floor in order to get into the so-called renewables.
	You know, I, I don't really care about renewables because quite frankly, why did they pick that word?
	It's because it was a CIA that came up with the idea of peak oil.
	Oh, there's no more oil.
	Remember that?
	We heard that infinitely in the 1970s, especially when Saudi, Saudis and OPEC came in and created the oil embargo.
	Everybody was lining up and rationing gas.
	Well, this is it.
	I mean, even a tower power group that we used to do covers of their, of their stuff.
	Cause we had a, There's only so much wool in the ground.
	Sooner or later, there won't be none around.
	Alternate sources of power must be found, because there's only so much wool in the ground.
	Can't cut loose without that juice.
	But, you know, here we are, 50 years later, and still plenty of that juice around.
	Show the magazines over and over again.
	Yeah, we're gonna be out of oil and gas and everything in the mid-1980s.
	We're not gonna have any more of that.
	That was all coming from the CIA.
	That was a CIA narrative.
	And that's why they call it fossil fuels.
	They want you to think that they're expiring.
	There's only so much of it and it's going fast.
	So, I don't like that term fossil fuels.
	And I don't like the term renewable because it's attached to that, right?
	I think it's better to talk about reliables.
	And oil, gas, and coal are reliables.
	I'm for reliable energy, not the so-called renewable energy.
	With a break-even cost of $101 per megawatt hours, thanks to the subsidies, Equinor will make $54 per megawatt hour and Orsted will make only 45 per megawatt hour on something whose total cost should be $36 per megawatt hour.
	Think about that.
	Their profit, their profit is, um, you know, about 150, uh, Equinor, you know, 36, 54.
	I don't know.
	What is it?
	I don't know, what is it?
	Oh, 150% of what the entire cost should be?
	And that's their profit.
	I mean, that's not what they're selling it for.
	That's their profit.
	Their profit is one and a half times what the entire cost has been now.
	You want to talk about how we're being ripped off by this stuff?
	Isn't that amazing?
	I think it is amazing.
	They're going to charge you one and a half times.
	Their profit is going to be one and a half times what your total cost is now.
	And a lot of that is coming from taxpayers.
	Each of these foreign corporations, these foreign oil companies, you know, the green people, aren't they supposed to hate oil companies?
	Aren't they supposed to recoil on that?
	These foreign oil companies will each get a total subsidy of more than three billion dollars each.
	Stolen from U.S.
	taxpayers by the Biden administration and given to these foreign oil companies to produce wind power.
	And that's just for starters.
	We know that it's going to be far more expensive than that.
	Tennessee Valley Authority, as I mentioned before, is now going to raise rates again.
	Five and a quarter percent increase coming October the 1st.
	And of course, they're looking to put these battery energy storage sites, which are ridiculously expensive.
	This is something that Musk is pushing and selling.
	Remember, he offered to do it for free for Australia if he couldn't get it done within a short time window that he gave them.
	And he put it together, then it had a massive fire that was there.
	Now, they want to put these battery energy storage sites, not out in the middle of the desert, but they want to put them in residential areas with lots of trees around here.
	Massive cost, massive fire hazard, but it's going to make the world's richest man even richer.
	The Tennessee Valley Authority, the TVA, is a federally owned company.
	And it is the largest public power corporation in the country.
	It generates 90% of Tennessee's electric generating capacity and three-fifths of its power plants here in Tennessee.
	And so they just raised rates a year ago, 4.5%.
	Now they're going to raise them 5.25%.
	Let's just call it 10%.
	Now they're going to raise them 5.25%.
	Let's just call it 10%.
	9.75% in two years.
	In two years.
	I said, well, don't worry about it.
	It's not all that much.
	You can afford that per month.
	You know, we got starving billionaires out there that we need to feed.
	We got graft and corruption we need to feed.
	So you can kick in, you know, $10, $20, $30 more a month.
	No problem for you, right?
	This is like the argument they used to make about sales tax.
	I remember that they kept raising sales tax in North Carolina when I was there.
	And, uh, you know, it's like, okay, sales tax is 4%.
	We're going to go up to 5%.
	He's like, wait.
	What are you talking about?
	You know, that's all it's only a penny.
	It's only a penny.
	We're going to have a penny increase.
	It's like, no, you're going to have a 25% increase.
	That's 4% of everything.
	And you're going to go from 4% to 5%.
	That's a 25%.
	No, it's just a penny that we're going to.
	And then when they would go from five to 6%, it's just a penny or it's just a hay penny.
	You know, certainly you can spare a hay penny.
	The four and a half percent increase in 2023 was a completion of the Paradise fossil fuel plant shutdown.
	See, you're paying extra money because you're shutting down power plants and then building expensive alternative power plants.
	Taking something that's already been paid for where the incremental cost is just the fuel, shutting that down so they can do something that they call clean.
	So they said TBAs unilaterally hiked its rates by about 10% in just two years.
	Not even private utilities can do this without having a review from the public and from independent utilities commissions.
	You give them a monopoly and so you have an independent utilities commission that's going to have to look at the books and And make sure that they're not making excessive profits or whatever.
	Make sure they're operating efficiently.
	It's also open to the public to look at it, but not in the case of the TVA because it's federal.
	Everything's a secret.
	Federal government doesn't tell anybody anything it does because it wouldn't all figure out that they're crooks, right?
	The district of criminals.
	and Crooks, Washington, D.C.
	These new gas plants and pipelines will continue to make it harder for folks to pay their bills.
	Only in an Orwellian world of misinformation do we see our nation's largest public power utility pass a massive rate increase while providing the public the least amount of information compared to private utilities, which are publicly controlled.
	So, the energy ideology on which the U.S.
	has wasted one and a half trillion dollars already.
	That's the headline from WND, and I think that actually the headline should be the energy, not the ideology.
	It's not an energy ideology.
	It's an energy religion.
	It's being sold as a religion.
	I mean, they call you, if you don't believe this, they call you a denier.
	I'm holding out for the term climate infidel.
	Because this is a jihad against us, folks.
	I am a climate infidel.
	Always have been.
	It's absolutely insane what they're doing.
	So America's power grid is adding a lot of generating capacity.
	And it's because of AI.
	I mean, it was only a couple of years ago that they were saying, oh, we're going to have to stop cryptocurrency.
	Remember?
	That was part of the argument for CBDC.
	We've got to stop cryptocurrency.
	And we need to have CBDC because CBDC doesn't require proof of work.
	So it doesn't require as much calculation, so it doesn't require as much energy.
	And so we need to get rid of Bitcoin, all these other cryptocurrencies, and then we can just have the central bank digital currencies.
	Because those things will exchange not based on actual work that was done, to keep it honest.
	It'll just be proof of stake, is what they say.
	In other words, it's worth what I say it's worth.
	So it's because I say so.
	It's a fiat.
	currency again but now the thing that has thrown a monkey wrench into some of their plans is the fact they desperately want AI and they I think maybe you know I've had a lot of people say I don't think they're geniuses I think they're stupid and so there's a debate out as to what's what's happening with this this would be another Thing that we drop on the side of the scale that says stupid, I think.
	I think that they really didn't think about the fact that AI, they liked AI, but they didn't think about how much power it was going to use and how that was going to explode.
	AI is perfect for the police state, perfect for the surveillance state.
	That is the killer application.
	So America's power grid has added the most generating capacity in 21 years because of AI data center demand surges.
	Solar power was most of it, contributing 59% of all new additions.
	And of course that's going to be unreliable power.
	By the way, you know, when you look at the appetite of the artificial intelligence, it is much bigger than the cow's stomach.
	They need to be looking at the AI stomach.
	It's like Java, the hut.
	Uh, yeah, you need to kill the data centers.
	They kill these AI data centers, not the cows.
	Leave the cows, kill the NGOs, kill these globalist government schemes and the governments in Washington and other countries that are creating these schemes.
	Get rid of them.
	Get rid of their AI surveillance data centers.
	And keep the cows.
	But solar power is 59% of all the new additions, which means that they're adding very unreliable power.
	And then the next thing they're going to do is they're going to want us to buy these expensive battery energy storage sites out there.
	Battery storage capacity also saw significant growth, with about 21% capacity gains.
	Wind power added about 12%.
	So we need to start demanding reliable, not renewable.
	And it is all about the data centers.
	And if you look at where it's being added in Virginia, of course, the nation's data center capital, the state's largest utility, expects power demand to jump 85% in the next 15 years with power demand from data centers quadrupling.
	This is different from the Bluffdale, Utah thing out in the middle of the desert.
	The NSA, I guess about a decade ago, put this massive data center to store things.
	But they don't want the latency that comes with putting something out in a remote area.
	So because of AI, they're putting AI close to Washington.
	Because again, this is about the police and surveillance state.
	And so it needs to be close to the District of Criminals, who are going to be spying on us.
	Because they don't want that latency.
	But you know, it was ridiculous when they built this thing out in the middle of the desert in Utah, using more water than a city would and using more electricity than a city would.
	But that's nothing compared to the power and water demands of the AI.
	For example, the newest and largest class of data centers are so large that their power demand is equal to that of a city, the size of Seattle, Seattle, Seattle, where Amazon was headquartered.
	Dozens of these facilities are now in development.
	We're adding dozens of Seattles.
	So, let me just ask you this.
	You know, when you have... We look at the total heat of a system, right?
	And I think it kind of reflects back to the greenhouse effect as well.
	You know, you've got a greenhouse.
	What happens to... Yeah, it can get warmer inside the greenhouse, but if you've got a greenhouse and the temperature drops down into the 30s, Is it warm in your greenhouse or not?
	Or if somehow the outside temperature is up around 100 degrees or something, how hot is it going to be in your greenhouse?
	But the bigger story than the greenhouse.
	The greenhouse isn't making things hot.
	The greenhouse has a lag, but when we talk about our values on resistance in your home, it's the same type of thing.
	There's going to be It's still dependent on an external heat source or lack of it.
	So you can have all the insulation that you want in your home, but eventually it's going to assume, let's say room temperature, but it's going to be solar temperature, the amount of solar energy that's dumping in on the earth.
	And so when we talk about these AI data centers, how is it that we're so concerned about cow farts, but we're not concerned about the literal heat That is being generated by these data centers that are using as much power as a city the size of Seattle, and dozens of them added.
	That's a tremendous amount of heat.
	It's one of the reasons why they use so much water.
	But that's a tremendous amount of heat that's being generated directly into the environment.
	Now, you know, why wouldn't they be concerned about that kind of man-made heating?
	That is an actual source of heat.
	So, AEP, a utility with service territory in 11 central states serving 5.6 million customers, has reported that companies representing 15 gigawatts, gigawatts, Marty, of new power demand, mainly from data centers, are seeking connection by 2030.
	That's a power demand equivalent to what's needed for 10 million homes.
	10 million homes.
	So I guess we won't be able to have power for our homes.
	We probably won't be able to have power to have homes either.
	I mean, it's only the illegal aliens who are getting, um, in California, they just passed a law.
	What was that?
	150,000 each.
	They can get a subsidy to have a home because you know, they're dreamers.
	We don't have a dream anymore as an American, American dream is dead, but we got foreign citizens dreams and we have to subsidize those foreign citizens dreams.
	We got hallucinating artificial intelligence.
	So we've got to feed electricity too.
	So we can't have it ourselves.
	With the emergence of data centers and rising industrial activity, Georgia's main utility, Georgia Power, has boosted its demand projections 16-fold from a year ago!
	From a year ago!
	That's what I say.
	This is, I think, something that they'd not thought about.
	I mean, they'd been carefully crafting this climate MacGuffin and global warming and all this other kind of stuff, and we need to call them out on the absurdity Of being so concerned about emissions coming from our cars and things like that.
	Of course, they're not concerned about emissions coming from Musk's satellites.
	You know, he wants to send up 20,000 or so satellites.
	We don't need to worry about that.
	You know, the energy and the heat released into the environment.
	We don't have to worry about the wars.
	We don't have to worry about the bombs.
	We don't have to worry about the data centers.
	No, we have to worry about your SUV.
	You don't have to worry about the meat and dairy that you're consuming.
	That's all they're worried about.
	Isn't it transparent what they're doing?
	The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, ERCOT, that everybody was cursing a couple of years ago, the grid operator for most of Texas announced that this summer it expects power demand to nearly double in the state from six years ago.
	So I guess here's the bottom line.
	You need to start buying your blanket now.
	It's going to be shortage of blankets, I guess.
	The nation's grid operators are now adamant we face an alarming mismatch between the power we need and what we're going to have available.
	In fact, the nation's grid reliability watchdog is already warning of blackouts for much of the country by the close of the decade.
	Just right on time for 2030.
	You'll own nothing, you'll eat the bugs and you'll be freezing in your blanket.
	But even if the worst grid emergencies can be avoided, our self-imposed power shortages threaten immense economic damage.
	We're on a trajectory to short circuit our own economic potential.
	Bingo.
	That's the plan.
	That's been, that's the whole point.
	Wait a minute.
	You can't do that.
	It's going to, it's going to short circuit our economic potential.
	It's going to make sure that we don't own anything, that we're slaves." And it's like, yeah, yeah.
	I can just see Jeb Sinda Arden, a little tyrant from New Zealand, when they said that.
	Looks to me like you're setting up a two-tier society here.
	She goes, yep, yep, that's what I'm doing.
	Yep, yep.
	Smiles.
	And so you tell them we're on a trajectory to short circuit our own economic potential.
	Yep, yep, that's what we're doing.
	Yep, yep.
	Meeting the enormous electricity demand now on our doorstep requires using every tool at our disposal, including the very plants that the EPA is determined to close.
	No, we need, look, we need to use every tool at our disposal to close the EPA.
	And do you see anybody talking about doing that in the Republican Party?
	It was Richard Nixon who created the EPA.
	They're not talking about getting rid of it.
	But it's the EPA that is trying to shut... they're using emissions now to shut down power plants, just like they used emissions to shut down cars in the past.
	Now they've turned their attention to power plants.
	They're out of control.
	So finally, you have a lot of people who are complaining.
	Gavin McGuire, for example, at Reuters, he is just livid That Florida is using more fossil fuel.
	They're having a fossil fuel renaissance.
	And again, cross out the word fossil.
	They're having a fuel renaissance.
	And stubbornly refusing to give up on natural gas and other, let's just call it fuels.
	Because fuels are the workhorse of their energy grid.
	Over 80% of Florida's electricity has come from fuel since the beginning of June.
	This is compared to the national average of 62%, 62.4% in Texas.
	Is that 62%?
	Because Texas has gone full on into all of this so-called renewable garbage.
	That's why they have the problems with no reliability with their power grid.
	As if this somehow proves that Florida is an outlier in the worst way.
	No, these numbers should make Floridians proud.
	And that is absolutely true.
	On Rockfin, Crude Sausage, thank you very much for the tip, writes David.
	You're the only talking head I wholeheartedly trust.
	Here's a chunk of my pay raise.
	Well, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	Don't trust anything, though.
	Don't trust me.
	Look at what I say.
	I can make a mistake.
	I'm not going to deliberately lie to you, but don't trust anybody.
	Rock Finn.
	Spencer DeLong.
	Thank you very much.
	David here in Ohio.
	We have a website called Apples to Apples to compare energy prices from many suppliers for electric and natural gas.
	We just locked in a fixed rate of six cents per kilowatt hour for a two-year contract.
	If listeners in other states have this option, they could save a lot of money with the upcoming uncertainty.
	We cut our electric rate almost in half.
	Well, that's good to know.
	That's the thing.
	It's why it's important for us to look at why federalism is important.
	We have a laboratory here of a lot of different approaches.
	And so there in Ohio, one of the key things that you can do for people is you can give them information.
	Because, you know, you can't even get started on fixing anything if you can't audit it.
	That's one of the reasons why you had Ron Paul say, we've got to audit the Fed.
	If you audit the Fed, the problems and the solutions should be pretty obvious.
	And so you have to have information.
	It's one of the reasons why you can't have really a market in healthcare.
	If people can't get any information, we need to know at least not necessarily the accusations made against doctors and hospitals, but if they lose a malpractice thing, we should know that we should know their record of successful surgeries for different types of surgeries that should be available to people.
	When you hide that, you're doing the same thing for them that you do for the pharmaceutical companies, where you protect them from anything that they do wrong.
	And that only encourages wrongdoing.
	So yeah, having the information is very important.
	I really liked the interview that I had yesterday with Donald Rainwater, running for governor in Indiana as a third party, as a libertarian candidate.
	And, um, you know, he was not, um, you know, he's kind of old school libertarian candidate.
	He's, he's, he's not one of these guys that's into all the crazy, um, you know, DEI stuff.
	Cause that, that there's a, that's really where the libertarian party itself is going as well.
	But no, he's kind of an old school guy.
	He's focused on, um, cutting taxes, uh, preserving the second amendment and things like that.
	But I thought he had an excellent idea and that idea needs to be put out there in all the different states.
	And see if we can't, you know, give this idea to different state representatives and see if they won't run with it and try to get this thing passed.
	The idea being that we should be able to someday own a home.
	Isn't that the American dream?
	Except, of course, for property taxes, as we all know.
	You can never own your home.
	You're just renting it from the government.
	And I love the way that he described what the fundamental problem is.
	He said, everybody is so concerned about what Lala Harris is doing.
	She wants to tax you on, um, stock that, uh, based on the paper value of a stock or an investment.
	Um, sometimes they call that unrealized gain.
	We can argue about, uh, whether that's the correct term or not, but the, um, to have, um, To say that your stock has gone up in value, so send me some money.
	And you haven't sold that stock, so you don't know if you're gonna make any money or if you're gonna lose money off of that thing.
	Well, that's what's happening with the houses.
	Every year they reevaluate it.
	And they said, so what they're doing is they're essentially taxing you on unrealized gain because you haven't sold a house and your house really isn't worth anymore.
	It's only got a higher dollar value because of inflation.
	So they're taxing you on the inflation.
	But I think the way to explain it to people is to explain it in terms of unrealized gain and there's the Travis pull this up this is the thumbnail that he used for the report there the house there nice looking picture the but but bottom line is that you know you should be able to not be taxed for this unrealized gain so he said so fix the tax At the price of the house when you got it.
	And he said, uh, you know, make it a 7% tax, for example, or whatever the number is in this particular case, he said, we'll do 7%.
	And you can either pay that in a lump sum at the beginning and fold it into your mortgage, or you can pay 1% a year for seven years.
	And then you're done and you don't ever pay any more taxes.
	And you won't be driven out of your home when you get older and your income drops.
	Because if you're on a fixed income, that's not going up, but the inflation is going to go up really high.
	This is an idea that could really be very, very powerful for the politician that wants to pick this up and run with that ball.
	Because we're going to be seeing super big inflation coming up.
	And tell people that they're going to lose their homes if we don't do something about this property tax situation.
	This is going to be how they kick people out of their homes.
	They say, well, you know, homes are not accessible to the younger people because they've gotten so expensive.
	Well, how do they, how do they get the people who have their mortgage from years ago and can afford their mortgage while they can drive them out of their home with unaffordable property taxes?
	That's the reality.
	This really does need to change.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, let's go.
	So, we're going to take a quick break.
	So, let's go.
	So, we're going to take a quick break.
	So, let's go.
	So, we're going to take a quick break.
	So, we're going to take a quick break.
	So, let's go.
	So, we're going to take a quick break.
	So, let's go.
	So, let's go.
	So, we're going to take a quick break.
	So, let's go.
	So, we're going to take a quick break.
	So, let's go.
	the
	Making Sense. Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	We're going to talk a little bit about Lala and her flip-flops, and I'm not talking about her footwear.
	On Rumble, Audi, Modern Retro Radio, good to see you here.
	And he says, that property tax idea is great, but it will never become a campaign issue for Team D and Team R, Republicans and Democrats.
	They are leeches.
	Well, I agree, but it's the only third parties are important.
	Yeah.
	Rainwater had that there because he's a third party.
	And when we were running similar campaigns back in the late 80s and early 90s, very early 90s, we had a good gubernatorial candidate.
	He was very articulate, looked good, was a businessman, family man, that type of thing.
	And I was his campaign manager.
	And what we did was we set up, said, let's talk about a pocketbook issue here.
	And so we focused on the sales tax on food.
	And we set up a commercial and played some colonial music in it.
	We filmed the commercial in our kitchen.
	And Scott had a bag of groceries.
	And so we're playing, you know, colonial music.
	And so the Revolutionary War was fought over a 3% tax on tea.
	But today in North Carolina, we have a 6% tax on everything that you eat or drink.
	We need to stop that.
	Time has come to stop that.
	Vote for me in Bollywood, right?
	And we just played on some cable channels that were left over, unsold spots.
	And so we're kind of in the corners of the cable networks.
	And yet we had the Speaker of the House, Who's a Democrat.
	Dan Blue saw it.
	And after we ran that for a couple weeks, he comes out and says, on the clear blue sky, Dan Blue says, vote for us and we'll take a look at getting rid of the sales tax on food.
	And then we didn't get any support.
	And it was in the noise.
	And so then the issue just went away.
	This is why it's not a wasted vote, folks, to vote for independent third party candidates.
	If they got a message, if they've got some ideas, if you want the Republicans and Democrats, they won't do a thing unless they feel threatened.
	Let them feel threatened.
	Make them feel very threatened.
	Let them be afraid for change.
	Vote your conscience.
	Vote for issues.
	Don't vote for these grifting personalities that are out there.
	It makes me sick.
	And that's all that Lala's campaign and Trump's campaign is about, isn't it?
	Everybody in the ride is laughing about the fact that she won't do any interviews and it's all about joy.
	This enjoy that and how pathetic that whole, uh, tact is.
	And it is.
	And even when she has issues, the only issues that she's talked about are things that she has changed to say, yeah, I'm going to be, I'm going to do that issue.
	Like Donald Trump's doing it.
	How is that inspiring anybody?
	There's only one issue on which they disagreed and that was abortion.
	And so now Trump's adopted her position on abortion.
	They're just copying each other.
	Uh, you know, and of course the, the Republicans are saying, look at how she's copying everybody, but he's copying her on abortion.
	She copies him on the tax, uh, getting rid of tax taxes on tips and things.
	He copies her on abortion.
	She's now gonna copy him on the border wall claiming that she never That she always was for a border wall.
	She she was always opposed to it and everything they will also Copy third parties but You know again, they may say that they're going to do it, but they get reelected.
	They're not gonna do it and I mean, you have to vote these guys out at some point in time, but at least give support to the idea.
	If there's enough support...
	On the ideas that these third-party candidates are running on, they may, the smart ones, may say, well, you know, maybe that's what we should do to get or to retain power.
	But more likely, you're going to have to vote some people in that are independents or third parties to get what you want.
	And a good example of the arrogance and the attitudes, you want to see this whole campaign, this whole neo-feudal system in a nutshell, Well, take a look at what happened with these Secret Service thugs as Jill and Hunter Biden are out shopping on yet another vacation on our dime.
	And they've got their Praetorian Guard out there yelling and screaming and shoving people.
	Look at this.
	The First Lady and her family made a surprise visit to Los Olivos today.
	Out of the runway!
	Move!
	Now!
	Pushing and shoving people.
	We're trying!
	We love the Bidens!
	community of Los Olivos Friday afternoon as the Bidens hit the town. We're trying.
	Jill Biden visited. We love the Bidens. Shopping accompanied by her son Hunter Biden and family along with more than 10 Secret Service agents and local law enforcement. Get out of the way slaves. Drew a small crowd.
	Cynthia Sixto tells me Hunter Biden stopped in with his kids.
	Did he leave behind any white powder or anything?
	to matcha and ice vanilla latte and he came in to Lesby.
	Yeah.
	During the family visit.
	Did he leave behind any white powder or anything?
	Thou shalt not approach the royal crackhead.
	Thou shalt stay far away from him.
	I wonder what he was shopping for.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	Isn't that the perfect, arrogant metaphor of our new feudal overlords?
	Get out of the way!
	Get out of the way, slave!
	Secret Service, roughly clearing people so that she, Ashley, and Hunter could shop while on vacation yet again in California with local police protection as well.
	And look, this happens all the time with these people.
	Whenever they come to town, what do they do?
	Oh, well, close down all the roads and interstates.
	Got a traffic jam now.
	Why?
	Well, because the president, whether it's a Republican or Democrat, is driving through town.
	So get out of the way.
	Your master is here.
	Bow down.
	Get out of the way.
	Get off the road.
	Get off.
	That's it.
	Everywhere you look.
	Violently pushing people so they can go shopping.
	Yet another taxpayer-funded vacation.
	One security detail member screaming, out of the roadway, move now, go!
	You know, while violently pushing the woman, as you saw.
	Just out for a little bit of shopping.
	Jill Biden and the rest of the Biden parasites, said one report.
	Spent just 30 minutes in Los Olivos.
	They disrupted the small town and spent taxpayer money on nearly a dozen Secret Service agents and local law enforcement officers so that Queen Jill could go on a shopping spree.
	Now for another nine-day vacation in Delaware, says Miranda Devine.
	Taxpayers are spending millions of dollars on planes and helicopters and motorcades and Secret Service to ferry the President and his family all over the country on this endless vacation.
	Do none of them have a job?
	Well, no.
	Actually, they don't.
	Especially now.
	It's made pretty obvious that he doesn't have anything to do.
	It's AI versus human leadership.
	The debate over a plan to govern Cheyenne, Wyoming, using artificial intelligence.
	Well, you know, I can kind of see the case for that.
	It probably is more intelligent than Lala.
	Or Biden.
	We're going to put people like that in place.
	I mean, why not have a machine or something?
	Because Lala's intelligence is equally artificial.
	Victor Miller recently threw his hat in the ring for Mayor of Cheyenne, Wyoming, pledging to manage the 65,000-person city exclusively with a generative AI bot that he built himself.
	He calls it VIC, or the Virtual Integrated Citizen.
	He argued that it could quickly scan heaps of municipal documents, summarize events, render error-free judgments in near real time, and that its rulings would also be objective, without fear of favor or influence.
	Look, somebody tells you that it's error-free, that it's completely objective, that it has no influence, no bias.
	That person is lying to themselves and to you.
	That's all lies.
	But that's how artificial intelligence is going to be sold to us.
	Completely objective and fair.
	We need to use it to govern us.
	We need to use it to prosecute us.
	Got to use it in the courts.
	Got to use it in the mayor's office.
	All the rest of this stuff.
	Tech-savvy Wyoming is arguably the most crypto-friendly state in the U.S., so maybe it's fitting that its capital city also has the first AI political candidate, says this article from Zero Hedge.
	Well, I don't know.
	I mean, maybe it's crypto-friendly because they see all the A-holes coming to J-hole all the time.
	Jackson Hole, where the Fed goes.
	AI should be considered a tool that we can use to help government services run more efficiently.
	Not take over entirely, said a professor in the Department of Neurobiology at the University of California, San Diego.
	Well, the question is, right, do you want a government to run efficiently if it's not doing the right thing?
	Shouldn't we have that discussion?
	Again, the question that needs to be asked of all these people is, what is your vision of government?
	What is the legitimate role of government?
	And how do you keep it to that?
	It would be nice if somebody were to ask that question.
	The problem is, is that the government and the media that are colluding together and all these corporations don't believe that there should be any limit whatsoever on government.
	So that's why they don't ask that question.
	You know, we would like to know if they do think that there should be a limit, and if so, what is that?
	But if there's no limit on what the government can do, do you want it to be efficient?
	Quite frankly, as I said before, if somebody has no character or morality, an individual with no character or morality, do you really want to make them very intelligent?
	No.
	And so it would be highly irresponsible at this point in time to use generative artificial intelligence for any moderate to high-risk decision-making in government.
	Well, I don't know.
	That's a CEO of a government technology firm.
	The one thing about artificial intelligence, it would probably hallucinate less than Hunter.
	But we have to wait and see.
	AI eliminates errors and makes faster decisions, they say.
	No, the slogan of Silicon Valley is to go fast and break things.
	And that's what it's going to do.
	And it's going to be used to surveil us.
	Do we really want a more efficient government?
	If we haven't properly defined what it's supposed to do, I think we should be very bold about the potential to create a hyper-efficient digital government model that drastically reduces inequalities and radically improves access to services.
	Says one of the people who is selling this stuff to government.
	I think that is one of the scariest, dumbest things that I've ever heard to say that we need to use it to drastically reduce inequalities and all the rest of the stuff.
	So let's take a look quickly at the flip flops because we've got Tony is going to be joining us at the bottom of the hour.
	Harris called Trump's border wall medieval.
	And now she says she backs the funding of it.
	So we've seen her do the flip-flops on the border.
	I want to talk about how she's flip-flopping on EVs.
	She said, me too, when it came to getting rid of taxes on tips, I certainly don't believe her.
	I don't believe Trump either.
	Because this is something that they could all do right now.
	Instead, what they're doing is they're making the IRS seven times bigger than it is right now.
	They want to... Oh, that's right.
	Tony is not today.
	That's right.
	He's not today.
	He's coming up.
	I keep thinking this is Thursday for some reason.
	Yeah, okay.
	Travis is relieved.
	He goes, wait a minute.
	He's coming in on Thursday.
	Well, we got time here to talk about this.
	So I'd have to rush this up, but I'll have time to go into all of her flip-flops.
	She has also flip-flopped on fracking.
	She has also flip-flopped on Medicare for All.
	Medicare for All is basically government-run health care.
	It's like the British NHS.
	It's where they have every other Canadian health care, that type of thing.
	So now she says, I don't support that, even though she always says, I don't support banning fracking.
	Now I support the border.
	Now I want tax on tips to end and all the rest of this stuff.
	She said in her convention speech that she supported the bipartisan border security deal negotiated between Democrats and Republicans earlier this year.
	But then the bill was killed by Trump.
	Wait a minute.
	How is this working out?
	Yeah.
	And this is one thing, you know, Biden doesn't tell you the truth too often.
	But occasionally, like a broken clock, he gets it.
	Biden accused Trump of stopping the biggest legislative crackdown on illegal immigration for years because he thinks it's a bad thing for him politically.
	He wants that issue.
	Folks, I've seen this over and over again, and that's really what happened with this stuff.
	And so he tells Mike Johnson, don't, don't do that.
	And Mike Johnson.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	We'll just give money to the IRS and Ukraine war.
	How about that?
	And Israel.
	Okay.
	Money for Israel, money for the IRS and money for the Ukraine war.
	So we can start world war three.
	But we're not going to do anything about our border.
	We've got all the foreign wars.
	We're very worried about all their borders, but not about our border.
	And it's because Biden told them, Hey, we got to shut this thing down.
	We want to have that issue.
	They've done this over and over again.
	on a lot of these core wedge issues.
	They literally don't want to do anything about them.
	So Trump flip-flopped on that as well.
	Trump flip-flopped on locking up Hillary.
	Trump flip-flopped on the border.
	Trump flip-flopped on the Second Amendment.
	Big time, he set a precedent for a gun control by executive order.
	Caroline Leavitt, the Trump campaign press secretary, said Lala's record proves that she's open border.
	She called the wall un-American.
	She called it a waste of taxpayer money.
	She called it medieval.
	And she said it wasn't going to stop illegal immigration.
	You know, she's kind of right because the wall is not the thing that we need.
	What we need to do is stop offering money to people like California, for example, like I said before, give people from who come here illegally from other countries, give them $150,000 to get a house, which you don't give to Americans.
	Oh, let's give them tuition benefits.
	So we don't give to American citizens and all the rest of the stuff.
	You're not only giving them massive subsidies.
	But you're giving them more than you even give American citizens.
	And so of course they're going to come in.
	They'll go around the wall.
	They'll go over the wall.
	They'll go under the wall.
	They will fly into the country if they have to.
	They'll come by boat.
	If you give them a big enough incentives, they will find a way to come in.
	They're not stupid.
	We're stupid.
	We're allowing our government to do this.
	They're selling us out.
	This is a Cloward and Piven strategy.
	This is about bankrupting the United States by creating a massive welfare state and opening it up to the world.
	And it's unsustainable.
	And it's unsustainable by design.
	And so the wall is not the solution, folks.
	They're going to fight over this.
	Republicans are going to say, well, you copied me.
	Well, you didn't do it.
	And all the rest of the stuff.
	But the wall is not the solution.
	Reducing the welfare state, or at least cutting the welfare state off for foreign citizens coming here illegally.
	And I would say for legal immigration as well.
	You want to come here?
	You get the full Ellis Island experience, where you come here for the freedom and the opportunity, not for welfare, ever.
	Not even if you become an American citizen.
	And then maybe we can talk about cutting off the welfare for American citizens, too.
	But definitely for foreign citizens, we cannot afford to do that.
	As a senator, says Caroline Leavitt, Trump's press secretary, Lala tried to block Trump's construction of the border wall.
	And as borders are, she halted construction of the border wall.
	And neither the Democrats or Republicans will talk about what the real problem or the real solution is.
	And now the New York Times has turned on Lala.
	They're slamming Lala as weak, as a phony, as ignorant.
	Even the New York Times can tell the truth sometimes.
	You know, Biden told the truth about Trump and now the New York Times is telling you the truth about Lala Harris.
	How in the world is this happening?
	This is an article from Daily Mail.
	By the way, it is interesting and it is, you know, I don't put much faith in polls, especially when we're months out.
	Anything can happen.
	Look at what's happened already this year.
	All of these back and forth.
	I mean, you know, um, Democrats kicking Biden out?
	The fact that both Biden and Trump were able to run without doing any debates that, you know, all the lawfare that was done on Trump, turning him into a martyr so he didn't have to debate anybody or go through a primary system.
	And then they throw the guy on, the Democrats throw out all the people who are challenging Biden.
	And then Biden gets close to the thing and they throw him out.
	I mean, and then RFK Jr joins with Trump.
	Anything can happen.
	You know, the shooting stuff.
	So, polls don't really mean anything at this point.
	But I thought it was interesting, though, to see Karl Rove, who absolutely despises Trump, the self-proclaimed turd blossom from the Bush camp.
	Karl Rove said, if you go back and you look at the 2016 and 2020 elections, He said, um, Lala is doing a lot worse than Hillary or, um, Biden did.
	And, uh, they were like six and 7% above Trump at this point, uh, 2016 or 2020.
	And she's only one and a half percent in terms of an average of the polls.
	So, who knows what is going on.
	But again, you know, the polls, I think it's too soon to say that about polls.
	But it is interesting to see that after the DNC convention, they immediately turned on Lala.
	And it was the New York Times.
	And it's one op-ed piece after the other coming after her.
	A brutal headline that read, Joy is not a strategy.
	Well, it's not.
	It's not a policy, either.
	New York Times Deputy Opinion Editor Patrick Healy said he'd cringed when former President Bill Clinton took the convention stage on Tuesday to claim that Harris would be the, quote, President of Joy, unquote.
	How naive and childish.
	How is that going to help millions of Americans whose livelihoods are now at stake, Healy asked.
	He's with the New York Times.
	And why has Harris failed to conduct a single interview or serious press conference since Biden stepped aside last month?
	They're starting to get angry about it.
	It's about time, right?
	How, how dare them be silent while she is silent?
	Harris, he said, cannot coast on joy.
	But it was even worse to come from The Times.
	On Monday, the newspaper published a guest essay titled, Trump Can Win on Character.
	by conservative commentator Rich Lowry, who wrote, Harris is weak and a phony and doesn't truly care about the country or the middle class. She doesn't care if her tax policies will destroy jobs.
	She has been part of an administration that has seen real wages stagnate while minimizing the problem because the party line matters to her more than the economic reality for working Americans.
	Well, that's true.
	All that is true.
	It's not to say that Trump's any better.
	I mean, look at what he did to Main Street small businesses.
	They were not essential.
	He destroyed them by the millions.
	But for such harsh words to appear in the New York Times will no doubt be seen as a warning shot by Harris's team.
	And then another Times guest essay written by financial journalist Roger Loewenstein and published on Tuesday took further aim at Harris's economic policy.
	Also criticized Trump's position on import tariffs as nonsensical.
	Loewenstein slammed Harris as censorious and vague in her plan to unveil communist-style price controls on supermarkets.
	Yeah, it is beyond stupid.
	It is totally la-la.
	And I'm not talking about any joy at all.
	Her staffers are now claiming that she doesn't support electric vehicle mandates, as a matter of fact.
	But the Biden EPA last March implemented new regulations to convert half of all new car sales to electric by 2030.
	Remember, that's been their stated goal for a very, very long time.
	That we're going to get rid of internal combustion engines.
	And we're going to go all electric and we're going to go to 50%.
	And you know, here is, um, uh, this is from Fox news, Biden administration reportedly doubling down on gas car crackdown.
	Tinkering with the near term speed of implementation doesn't change the end game, which is to ban new gas powered cars.
	So they're playing semantics with all of this stuff.
	And it's the Biden EPA, but it's not just the EPA.
	It's also the department of transportation is now getting in on this as well.
	Uh, what they did was they moved the data a little bit further out, but they still want to gradually get rid of, ban, kill internal combustion engines.
	Uh, and so, uh, if you, uh, if you do it gradually, if you do it by, uh, say you can't make any more of these, right, that's a ban.
	They want to say it's not a ban.
	They played that same kind of semantic game when they talked about, well, the mandates that we have for the vaccines, that's not really a mandate.
	I mean, we're just coercing people.
	We're just telling them, no jab, no job.
	But we're not sending the police around to pull you out of your house and stick a needle in your arm.
	Now, Alan Dershowitz, Trump's friend, loudly proclaimed that he would do that, that he would argue that before the Supreme Court.
	He said he would win.
	And that's what they mean when they fall back and say, see, I'm not mandating the vaccine.
	I'm just coursing you in every way possible and not calling the coercion a mandate.
	And that's what they're doing with the vehicles.
	Well, we are going to coerce you by making things ridiculously expensive.
	We're going to tell the manufacturers that they can't make any more of these, but you know, you'll still have them around.
	And then at some point they will tell the refineries that they can't make any more oil.
	Or that they can't sell it to you.
	But they're not going to take away your car.
	They're not going to send Alan Dershowitz around to tow your car away.
	No, you can still keep it.
	Maybe you can set it up as a lawn ornament or something like that.
	But we're not going to ban the cars.
	We're going to grandfather that car in.
	You can do with it whatever you want.
	You just can't drive it, right?
	And we'll have Alan Dershowitz who will defend that, and he'll take it to the Supreme Court, and he'll probably win.
	Because he's a very cunning liar and lawyer.
	And then, you know, she takes the idea that this is not a mandate, and this is put out by the Harris and Waltz campaign.
	What a pathetic looking logo that is.
	With all that money.
	I mean, she got $500 million in one month, and she didn't spend a penny of it on a logo.
	She's got this claim coming from J.D.
	Vance that Vice President Harris wants to force every American to own an electric vehicle.
	No, she's not going to force you.
	She's going to incentivize it for you.
	You know, like they did with the jab stuff and everything.
	Look, the Republicans deserve this kind of You know, sophistry.
	Because that's the same kind of sophistry they used on us.
	I'm not forcing you.
	I'm just going to provide this to you for free.
	Guess what?
	We got DeWine, a Republican governor.
	Get your jab and maybe I'll put your name in the lottery and maybe you'll win a million dollars.
	Or maybe you'll die.
	Or maybe you'll be crippled for life.
	Who knows?
	You want to play the game?
	Anyway, she denies the coercion and she talks about the EV incentives.
	It's just like the GOP when I talked about the VAX.
	When she was a senator, Harris co-sponsored the Zero Emissions Vehicle Act of 2019.
	One of the things that helped her become the most liberal senator in the short time that she was there.
	It contained a requirement for car manufacturers to sell only zero emission vehicles by 2040.
	So again, um, maybe, you know, first they make it expensive and they subsidize the other stuff.
	And then they say, we're not going to make any more of these that are new.
	Then maybe we're going to shut down the fuel for you and all the rest of the stuff.
	So she has, she has flip-flopped or copied Trump on the border, on the taxes, on tips, on fracking, on cars, on Medicare for all.
	And then of course he's done the same thing, right?
	He's moved to her side on the only issue that she's got, which is to murder children.
	And Trump wants to jump in on that as well.
	And we'll talk about that when we come back, but first we're going to talk a little bit about the economy.
	And I want to talk about gold.
	I was waiting because I was thinking this is Thursday and that, uh, that Tony was going to be on with us.
	Uh, but I've got a lot of want to talk about with that on a rumble stuff.
	Patriot.
	Thank you for the tip.
	And he writes, the typical government, they force us to pay for our own abuse.
	That is what they do, isn't it?
	We'll be right back.
	Welcome to the World of Music.
	Welcome to the World of Music.
	So
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you Let's talk a little bit about what's happening with money and with gold and with currency.
	Many countries are turning to a quote stateless currency unquote gold.
	Now, Tony has talked many times about the difference between currency and money, right?
	And, of course, Mike Meharry also knows better.
	That's why he puts it in quotes.
	Michael Meharry, I've interviewed him many times in his capacity working for the Tenth Amendment Center.
	He knows economics, he knows gold, and he knows the Constitution as well.
	He's a good guy.
	But yeah, so what is the difference between currency and money?
	Well, currency doesn't have any intrinsic value.
	Money does.
	That's why gold is money, and fiat currency is what we talk about.
	Currency doesn't have it.
	That's why you put it in the quotes.
	Currency is a medium of exchange, and so can money be a medium of exchange.
	But money also is a store of value, unlike fiat currency.
	And so a recent article published by Nikkei Asia called gold a stateless currency.
	That's why he puts it in the headlines, noting that central banks are diversifying away from the dollar and from the yuan.
	Central banks globally added in the first six months of this year, 5% more than they did the first six months of last year.
	And that was a record.
	What they added last year.
	And so they're radically increasing their holdings, these different banks.
	And for them, they don't really need a currency.
	What they need is a store of value.
	Actually, so do we, don't we?
	We need a store of value.
	We need some wealth insurance.
	So why are so many countries turning to gold?
	Because it is a currency that doesn't require a state behind it.
	In other words, it's a medium of exchange.
	But it is also a store of value.
	Gold is not controlled by any government.
	That means a country is holding gold.
	Maintain a higher level of independence than those holding dollars or other government fiat currencies, writes Mahari.
	It says, US policy persuaded emerging economies to accumulate gold and to shift away from the currency holdings that reflect global fragmentation.
	We can thank Biden for accelerating all of that.
	Of course, it's something that the Federal Reserve has been doing for quite some time.
	The quantitative easing that they've been doing since 2008 and so forth.
	Just one bad economic policy after the other.
	But then Biden brought in his unique aspect of it to use the dollar as a weapon.
	A classic example of people responding to incentives.
	He said, think about it.
	If you recognize something makes you vulnerable because Biden used it as a weapon, what do you do about it?
	Well, you take steps to eliminate that or at least minimize that vulnerability.
	And you know, this applies to individuals.
	It applies to us as individuals, not just to us as countries.
	You take steps to minimize that vulnerability.
	So if you're worried that the U.S.
	and its allies might cut off your access to dollars, what would you do?
	You'd minimize your dependence on dollars.
	In other words, if you're concerned the U.S.
	could pull the dollar rug out from under you, why not pull out from the dollar system first?
	And that's what they're trying to do.
	You know, the big central banks are accumulating gold as quickly as they can.
	They economically can't just get rid of everything because then, you know, even the central banks can't just dump gold.
	They've got to dump the dollar because they've got a lot of it.
	They can't just dump it and get gold.
	Because that would send the price of gold sky high and it would send the value of the dollar straight down and they would be there with nothing at all.
	They have to play along with this confidence game to an extent in order to gradually offload it.
	You and I have a different kind of constraint because we have limited financial resources, but we can start to accumulate this in a gradual way as well.
	That's why I really like what Tony has done.
	It's pretty unique.
	Setting up Wolfpack, where you can gradually accumulate on a monthly basis.
	You sign up for a dollar amount that you want to buy into.
	And then each month he sends you, you sign up for $50, he sends you $50 worth of metal.
	and gold and silver, that type of thing.
	You can find that at davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Aardman's Wise Wolf.
	And of course, you don't have to, you know, if you've got the resources and the ability to do things all at once, if you've got an IRA that you want to roll over into gold or silver, it can help you to do that as well.
	If you want to directly purchase gold or silver.
	You can do that with him as well.
	Large or small transactions.
	Or you can just say, I want to accumulate gold and silver, and he'll pick the, you know, depending on what level you're in, you'll get a different mix of gold and silver each month.
	Gold exposes the owner to very little counterparty risk.
	That's another thing that Tony has always talked about.
	He said, you know, gold is the only thing that doesn't have a counterparty risk.
	And so what does he mean by that?
	Well, if you loan somebody some money, Uh, they may not pay you back.
	Right.
	And so that's the counterparty risk.
	Counterparty risks that we have with the federal government is, you know, maybe, uh, bond owners are starting to look at this now.
	You know, it's, it's not a, not the safe, uh, investment that people have always thought that it might be.
	And so, uh, what is that based on?
	It's based on the government's ability to pay back, or if they're going to pay you back with some dollars that aren't worth nearly as much as they are today.
	Because they want to monetize the debt.
	When you own physical gold and you store it safely at home, there isn't another party involved.
	Nobody can default on the gold.
	Its value will never go to zero.
	It remains liquid under virtually any market conditions and gold will likely increase in value if there is a significant economic collapse because it is real money.
	That's why the central banks are bringing gold home.
	Maybe they know something that you need to pay attention to.
	And of course, you don't need to store it in your home or wherever you store it.
	Someplace where it's available to you.
	The bottom line is it's a store of value.
	It is wealth insurance.
	Again, davidknight.gold will take you to Tony.
	Let him know that you're coming through us and we really appreciate his support of the program.
	Democrats are excluding Bitcoin and crypto from their 2024 platform.
	I didn't talk about this when it happened.
	They released that just before their, just before their pageant began.
	I guess that's what we could call it.
	The dilation and curatage patent or pageant where they focus all on abortion.
	And so, for the longest time, they wanted to get rid of Bitcoin and of cryptocurrency in general.
	And, of course, that's one of the tells, I think, about this situation with the Telegram CEO, Pavel Dorov, because they're making the same arguments against him that they make against cryptocurrency.
	Which tells you that they've got a different agenda, and we're going to talk about that coming up.
	You know, what is really going on with it?
	Is it really about free speech?
	What is free speech?
	What part of free speech do we need to protect?
	But there's a lot of people who are saying, this guy is just another grifting billionaire.
	True.
	True.
	But I don't have to support the person or what the person says or believes.
	I support the idea of a digital public square that the government is hands-off of.
	And we know what the government is trying to do with this, I think.
	Because it's what they tried to do with crypto.
	Oh, well, you know, cryptocurrency is used for child trafficking, is used for pedophiles, is used for drug trade, is used to buy organized crime, to murder people, all this stuff.
	And it's like, well, yeah, that's true of your currency as well.
	And maybe even to a greater degree of your currency.
	And so now they're making these same arguments about a social media site.
	I think that's the big tell.
	But again, um, the Democrats have, uh, many reasons that they don't want to have cryptocurrency primarily because they're trying to push CBDC through.
	So there was no mention whatsoever of Bitcoin or of any cryptocurrency in their platform.
	This aligns with the past four years of the Biden and Harris administration's hostility towards crypto.
	And, um, I guess it's because their plans for all crypto is so bad.
	They don't even want to mention it.
	Don't talk about that issue.
	Let's move them to abortion again.
	Well, they want to abort crypto.
	That's what they want to do.
	Despite the growing significance of Bitcoin and digital assets, neither Harris nor Walz have prioritized the inclusion of Bitcoin and crypto in the party's agenda.
	Trump, on the other hand, has jumped into it with both hands and both feet.
	And he's been supported by a lot of people in the crypto industry.
	A couple of weeks ago, Tony went to the Bitcoin convention that was in Nashville, where Trump was speaking, and RFK Jr.
	was speaking, and he had the Winklevoss twins, gave lots of money to him, and many others in the crypto business gave a lot of money to Trump.
	The Republican Party has embraced it.
	They pledged to end what they describe as the Democrats' unlawful, un-American crypto crackdown, and to oppose the creation of a central bank digital currency.
	Hopefully they're serious about it.
	You never can tell.
	Wouldn't it be nice if they would do the same thing for free speech?
	This is the platform that was written by Trump's surrogates.
	People like Marsha Blackburn wrote that and we'll have more to say about that when we get to the abortion thing.
	Wyoming, as we mentioned before, Wyoming is very much into the crypto sphere and everything.
	They want to launch their own stable coin in 2025.
	In response to the Fed's policy of supporting these too-big-to-fail, too-big-to-jail banks.
	And this is kind of the same type of thing that Nicely was trying to do with gold.
	Frank Nicely.
	And again, it just bothers me so much to see the big-moneyed interest, the outside interest, interest outside of Tennessee come in.
	The money that they spent to get him out of office.
	I was talking to a friend this weekend.
	Who said, I know you don't watch TV, but he said, uh, I watched TV.
	I watched Fox news.
	And he said, it was just nonstop TV commercials against Frank nicely.
	And it was nonsense.
	It wasn't a vote for me.
	Here's my resume.
	You know, look at all the wonderful things that this guy doesn't talk about himself at all.
	Yeah.
	He's this mystery figure who suddenly emerged on the scene.
	And he doesn't have any policies that he wants.
	Instead, he photoshops pictures of Nicely with Biden.
	Biden and Nicely have never been together.
	Oh, he loves Biden.
	No, he doesn't, actually.
	What nonsense.
	But I love Trump, okay?
	All about that kind of stuff.
	Just lies.
	And the amount of money that he was given from outside the state.
	Again, Frank nicely went up against outside money, trying to get the bill passed in Tennessee.
	His fellow Republicans didn't want to do it.
	And so then the outside money came for him.
	He wanted to set up a, you know, an alternate system that was going to be a backup system because the Fed's policies are driving us into bankruptcy and a depression.
	And so they got to get him out.
	A so-called Republican.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Well, Wyoming is going to launch a stable coin next year because again, different states Are going to take different approaches to the irresponsible federal government and Federal Reserve policies that are out there and the insider trading that is going on as well.
	You know, we talked a lot last week.
	About how the federal government lies about economic information, just like they lie about pandemics, just like they lie about climate, and everything that they do is a lie.
	You know, how many lies do they have to tell you before they realize the government and the media are liars?
	They lie about everything, and they lie every quarter about the jobs report.
	Every quarter they will say, here's how many jobs we just recently created, and then they will revise the quarter before that And they will revise those jobs down so it always looks like we're always going up and always getting better.
	Except this time they did it at a near record amount.
	The only time they've had just a smidgen more jobs that they lied about was back in, I think it was 2009, in the midst of the Great Recession.
	And so they did it again.
	And even more interesting than their usual lies, and the magnitude of the lie, It's the fact that the Department of Labor gave this job data to three different organizations before they gave it to everybody else.
	A half hour before they gave it to everybody else.
	Yeah.
	So you can do insider trading on government lies and make a lot of money on the stock market.
	How about that?
	At least three banks managed to obtain key payroll numbers Wednesday, while the rest of Wall Street kept waiting for a half hour by government delay that whipsawed markets and sowed confusion on trading deaths.
	That was a week ago.
	So that's about 10 o'clock.
	You had three of these banks were wondering about it, and it was supposed to be released at 10 o'clock in the morning, Eastern Time.
	And it wasn't released, so these banks contacted the Department of Labor.
	And they gave him the information and then posted it half an hour later to everybody else.
	And the other people who, you know, they just, they trade on insider information and rumors and all the rest of the stuff.
	They're furious because these guys got an advantage on it.
	Anger quickly mounted as word spread across wall street.
	The Bureau of Labor Statistics had begun giving out the numbers over the phone.
	What a joke Wall Street is.
	I mean, it is a casino or worse.
	Meanwhile, as we look at what's going on, understand it's not just CBDC.
	That's a part of it.
	That's the labeling and the identification part of it and the prohibition part of it, but the enslavement part of it.
	It's really what they're doing with universal welfare, which they call universal basic income.
	And we have in all of these blue states, if you will, if you want to go with those colors, up in Washington state, they have started 25 low-income families receiving $500 per month for the next 12 months, no strings attached.
	And they want to say, well, this is an experiment on universal basic income.
	Which is just generalized welfare.
	This is meaning that we're going to take your job and to pacify you, to keep you from coming after us with the guillotines, as Bloomberg said, then we'll give you some cash.
	But isn't that what Trump did in 2020?
	We're going to take your job, take your food, take your travel, take your kids out of school.
	And here's a little bit of a stimulus check.
	And it's just a little bit.
	It's universal, but it's very, very basic.
	And UBI and artificial intelligence, UBI and AI go together.
	They are two sides of the same coin.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
	Well, I just want to mention while we're talking about preparing for the future, Trends Journal, Gerald Salenti's publication, you can go to trendsjournal.com, you can see examples of the work that's there, as well as if you use the code KNIGHT, You can save 10% off the prices.
	Gerald has pointed out when he comes on the show every other week, that takes it to like two and a half dollars a week.
	And he does about 300 pages of information about geopolitics, but about economics and what is coming down the road, the trends that are moving us down the road.
	Whereas the Wall Street Journal, Which is focused on pop culture as much as anything else, and pushing a government agenda.
	That costs $5 a day.
	With Code Night, it's $2.50 a week to get that information.
	He works really hard on that, and he knows what he's doing.
	He's got a lot of experience on that.
	Again, that is Trends Journal.
	The Code Night, K-N-I-G-H-T, will save you 10% off of that.
	Let's take a look at the billionaires who control free speech.
	Is Pavel Durov the next Julian Assange, asks Reason Magazine.
	No, I don't think so.
	I think he's the next Ross Ulbrich.
	Yeah, he will be famous and there will be a lot of people who will talk about it like they did with Julian Assange.
	I think Assange got more attention than Ross Ulbrich.
	I guess you could make a parallel to the Julian Assange is more about exposing what the U.S.
	is doing criminally, and when you look at Telegram, as I said before, Telegram is used heavily by Russia, Signal is used by Ukraine, and so there's that geopolitical aspect of it, like there was with Julian Assange.
	But when you look at the fact that they're coming after Durov, I think To intimidate and to terrorize people over privacy and over crypto.
	Because again, it's all the same stuff that they did about crypto.
	Well, your crypto is used for all these crimes used for drugs and trafficking and all the rest of the stuff.
	They have ramped up and they are ramping up in Europe.
	With the DSA, and we also see it happening with the Labour government in UK.
	I don't think it's a coincidence that these things are happening at the same time.
	They are doing censorship like we have never seen before, ramping it up amazingly.
	And I think that that's why I spent so much time on it on Monday.
	I thought it was the key story.
	And I still do.
	Because if we lose free speech, I'm one of the people who thinks that the First Amendment is actually more important than the Second Amendment, because I believe that the pen is mightier than the sword.
	And I think the founders of this country understood that as well, because they made it the number one amendment, not the other way around.
	So I think that having the information, if you can have a control on the information, you can keep people from even fighting.
	If, you know, you can pacify them without having a war.
	That's why I think the pen is mightier than the sword.
	You have to understand that it is, you know, we look at major weapon systems and think, wow, that's, but it's really, it's not the size of the weapons, it's the size of the fight and the man.
	And we have to understand that.
	That's the way they want to pacify the fight and the man.
	It's through their lies, their propaganda, and their censorship.
	And so the question has come out, did Macron invite him to come to France and die?
	Because everybody said, why would he go there?
	Why would he go there?
	Well, I can't see any evidence of that.
	I see a meme of that.
	My son showed that to me, but I can't, not Travis, my other son.
	And I don't see any evidence of that other than that meme, so that may not be true, but we do know that Macron invited Telegram to move their headquarters to Paris in 2018.
	But again, 2018 was an eternity ago.
	That was before any of this stuff started.
	It was in 2018 that we got deplatformed all at once by these tech companies in August 6th, 2018.
	And then two months later, 800 other sites got taken down.
	But yeah, that's when everything changed.
	But it was just before that, that Macron invited Telegram to move their headquarters to Paris.
	So we still don't know exactly why he went, because he's being held incommunicado.
	Both the UAE, United Arab Emirates, where he is a citizen, uh, and Russia where he was born.
	And I guess it's still also a citizen.
	Both of them have demanded that the French allow them to speak to him.
	But of course the French are being French, uh, and not allowing any of that poorly specified charges relating to failures of content moderation.
	And quite frankly, I think content moderation is a failure of government.
	Because it is censorious.
	I do not support censorship of any kind for any reason.
	If it's not clear that the collusion and the coercion exposed in the Twitter and Facebook files, it's net neutrality, it's age verification to keep kids safe, or attacking anonymous speech or false speech or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act for letting too many people talk about too much stuff, Yeah, that's what this is all really about.
	Now, that's reason talking, or minimizing the reach of wholly invented categories of speech that they will label as misinformation and disinformation.
	We understand all of that.
	Now, they will also include, and they did in their list, back page online advertising.
	And I think we do need to distinguish between some things that are in and of themselves, done directly to support criminal activity, versus something that was done to support a lot of trafficking of kids.
	That really was a trafficking aspect of it.
	And so we need to, you know, when we look at speech, what we're talking about is communication.
	And it's one thing if you've got a site or an individual who is communicating for criminal purposes, that is wrong, that should be prosecuted.
	And if the site is instrumental in doing that or organized in order to do that, that's very different in the case of Backpage, I think.
	That is very different than if you have a public square, and something happens in the public square.
	If you have, as frequently happens in this country, some kind of a drug deal in the public square, or you have a situation where, let's say, foreign espionage is happening, and you've seen it over and over again in the movies.
	Two guys sit on a park bench, and one guy leaves the newspaper there.
	Well, that's the one that's got the microfilm in it, that type of thing.
	Well, wait a minute.
	That happened in the public square.
	We got to shut down the public square.
	These types of things are going to happen in the public square.
	And so the question you have, the determination has to be, is this the public square or is this a site that is set up to do porn or to do child trafficking or something like that?
	You know, whatever the purpose of it is.
	If it is set up for a particular purpose, like Backpage was, then that's a different situation.
	We're not talking about the public square.
	So what I'm saying about free speech, what I mean is the speech that is expressly protected in the First Amendment, which is going to be political speech, religious speech.
	That's why they put those two things together there.
	That's what governments always want to censor, of course.
	And it is going to Be the thing that is directly under attack.
	That's why your ability to protest the government and to do it peacefully is protected explicitly.
	Your ability to freely exercise your religion because that is another thing that is constantly attacked.
	Or to just comment on politics.
	All of those things.
	That is always the focus of their attacks.
	And so, as I point out and reason, when he first ran for president in 2016, Trump wouldn't stop talking about how he wanted to open up our country's libel laws in order to better sue his critics.
	Tim Walz, and I've played the clip many times for you here, says, quote, there's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, and especially around our democracy.
	Well then you don't have a democracy, and you don't have rule of law.
	Because when you got your, you know, this is a guy who's been a congressman, he's been in the military, he's a governor, in all those positions he had to swear to uphold the Constitution.
	And the Constitution is about guaranteeing free speech, especially around politics.
	And we don't have a democracy.
	We supposedly have a republic.
	He's got all of it wrong.
	But he is a tyrant.
	He wants to, if he labels what you have to say as false, he wants to shut it down.
	This is the guy who lies about everything he did in the military.
	Musk asks Macron to explain why Durov was arrested.
	And I think that's worth pointing out that Musk has asked, the United Arab Emirates have asked, Russia has asked, Biden hasn't asked.
	Lala hasn't asked.
	Trump and Vance, neither of them have asked, right?
	Why are they not asking?
	Because they don't care.
	Because they would do the same thing.
	I mean, when you look at the Republican Party and many of the Democrats, we're talking about banning TikTok.
	And again, I think TikTok is disgusting.
	It's absolutely reprehensible as a site.
	And yet, if you're going to allow them to shut down websites, because you say, well, it might be, you know, I don't like the content that's there.
	We've got all these libs on TikTok.
	And they're doing crazy stuff, and they are deliberately trying to take down our society with depravity and all the rest of the stuff.
	They won't allow that in China, but they push it to us.
	Well, there's other ways that you need to attack that, in the same way that drug prohibition does not work.
	That's not to say that I agree with the use of drugs.
	It's not to say that I agree with what TikTok is about.
	But there are certain things that you have to take some responsibility for and you have to fight them yourself.
	Some of these things that are really spiritual, your character, your psychological, if you're an atheist, aspect of it.
	And drugs is one of those.
	And the kind of stuff that we see on TikTok is one of those as well.
	And we know that because all these efforts to interdict this have failed for half a century.
	So, Musk said it would be helpful for the global public to understand more details about why he was arrested.
	And really what we've seen is a laundry list of accusations without any details as to what that is.
	It's just he ran this website.
	So therefore that makes him complicit in anything that anybody did that was bad.
	I categorically reject that assumption.
	that assertion. Durov could face charges ranging from complicity in drug dealing, money laundering, to facilitating the distribution of child pornography.
	And they have made those claims against him. Again, as I said, the UAE, as well as Russia, is demanding access to him. So we're closely monitoring the situation of this guy who's arrested. But the French are stonewalling him.
	And Macron says, I don't have anything to do with it.
	It's not political.
	Do you believe that for a moment?
	I don't.
	He said, I'm completely independent of the judiciary.
	I have nothing.
	I know nothing.
	I don't do anything about it.
	We know exactly why this is happening.
	This is like, Trump and Biden claiming that they don't have anything to do with Julian Assange.
	And so Brian Shalhavi of Health Impact News has an interesting perspective on this.
	I agree with some of it, I disagree with some of it.
	He says, is this a free speech issue?
	What exactly do we mean by free speech?
	What speech should we protect?
	And then he points out, as many of the mainstream media have, that this Durov guy has said that he has more than 100 biological children.
	I haven't really talked about that because, to me, that is an obvious smear.
	The kind of smear that they did to Julian Assange, accusing him of rape, and that went away.
	We all knew what was behind that.
	And the same kind of smear that we saw with the Branch Davidians.
	Remember that?
	Oh, it's a religious cult, and they're marrying kids, and they're pedophiles, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And, you know, this weird Christian cult, and all the Baptists and other Christians are just, oh, yeah, I don't have anything to do with them, you know, total distancing from them, without really knowing what's going on, without really asking.
	And so this is what the ATF does.
	The ATF has now become a federal CPS?
	Child Protection Service?
	That's why they rated it?
	Because of child marriage?
	It was obviously a cover-up!
	Just like it was obvious that it was a smear when they were talking about Julian Assange and accusing him of raping two girls at once or something like that.
	It was obviously a lie.
	It was obviously just a smear.
	The thing about having 100 biological children, he said that he was a sperm donor.
	Because a friend asked him to.
	He said, I thought he was joking and I realized he was serious.
	So I did it for him.
	And he said, no, no.
	Then I heard that, um, they, that I've got, uh, the people that did it notified him and said, uh, there's a hundred children that are out there.
	So his response to it was, well, I'll make my DNA available if they want to try to connect with each other as kind of half siblings.
	But again, it's not to say that I agree with anything that he does.
	These billionaires, like the politicians, are not there to save us.
	But that is a completely different issue than whether or not the European Union or the Labour Party in the UK ought to be able to intimidate and censor the digital public square.
	I absolutely categorically deny that.
	There's absolutely no excuse.
	And so, when they pull in these ancillary things, they try to do that to muddy the water.
	They try to do it as character assassination.
	Because they have no character.
	Because all they want to do is censor.
	And what we're seeing now is a forging together of Orwell's ministry of truth, propaganda, and his ministry of love, the police state.
	And they do that and they say, well, we're going to tell you what you can and cannot say.
	We're going to force you to use these pronouns or do this so that you can't talk about whatever fill in the blank.
	And we do it because we want to save people from hate.
	We want to save people from bullying and we want to save the planet.
	Uh, we want to save people from the viral pandemic, all the rest of this stuff.
	Um, look, uh, speech is always.
	persecuted religiously and politically.
	That's why we have those two together in the First Amendment.
	And so when we talk about whether or not we can shout fire in a crowded theater, if these people are so concerned about misinformation, disinformation, why don't they arrest all of these climate prostitutes that have been screaming fire and global warming for 50 years?
	Proven to be liars.
	Why don't they arrest the people that did all this stuff to us with a so-called pandemic?
	Because they actually caused death.
	You know, you don't want to have somebody pulling the false alarm in a crowded theater.
	Well, these people have been pulling the false alarm with a pandemic and they killed tens of millions of people worldwide.
	Who knows how many total and how many people have been injured with this stuff?
	You're going to let them skate?
	We know what this is about.
	Come on, let's not even talk about that aspect of free speech.
	We know these people.
	We know what their agenda is.
	But I agree with Brian when he says that, sadly, the predominant view of free speech in most conservative right-wing communities is that free speech is defined by allowing those who think and believe like they do to have unrestricted access to the public to publish their views, while they have no problem if those who don't agree with them, such as liberal commies, are restricted in their speech.
	It's absolutely right.
	But it also goes the other way.
	The liberals don't have any problem with constricting other people's speech at all.
	They demand it, as a matter of fact.
	They don't like being censored by Elon Musk.
	And here's the point.
	Elon Musk is not running a free speech platform.
	And Brian Shelby points that out.
	I absolutely agree with him on that.
	He says, uh, billionaire technocrats have figured this out and they increasingly learn how to manipulate the right in order to make money off of them.
	Elon Musk is a perfect example of this, especially after he purchased Twitter and made it private because he reinstated Twitter accounts from those who were on the right and had previously had their accounts shut down before he bought Twitter.
	All these people on the conservative right now believe that he's a champion of free speech.
	And he did it with the most visible ones.
	And I'll make an example of what the ACLU used to do.
	When we were working in third party politics and we were fighting against, you know, trying to get included into debates and get on the ballot, you know, the unjust extra hoops that we had to jump through, it was unequal to what the Republicans and Democrats had to do.
	And then there were, you know, different standards to get on debate for us than it was for the Republicans and Democrats.
	The ACLU wouldn't do a thing, but the ACLU would make a big deal out of protecting neo-Nazis marching in Skokie, Illinois, a predominantly Jewish community outside of Chicago.
	They would make a big deal out of that to show Oh, well look at how open-minded, because the ACLU is mostly Jewish, look at how open-minded we are.
	We're all Jews, but we support the right of Nazis to march in Skokie, Illinois.
	But they wouldn't do a thing to protect the Second Amendment.
	They wouldn't do a thing to protect the First Amendment for people who are just trying to engage in a political process.
	They wouldn't do a thing to protect the First Amendment for people who want to have the free exercise of religion.
	And so that's what we're seeing.
	The same type of thing.
	Musk is doing the same type of thing.
	He puts Nick Fuentes on or whatever, right?
	It makes a big deal out of that.
	I, on the other hand, am still shadowbanned.
	Never was kicked off.
	I was just, you know, stuck over in the corner.
	Put under a can or something, whatever they do to make sure that nobody sees you or hears you.
	Oh, you have free speech.
	You can talk all day if you want to, but you don't have any reach, right?
	And it's what they do at everyone, both Republicans and the Democrats at every one of these big presidential conventions.
	If you go there and you want to do protesting, that's not allowed.
	You'll get arrested.
	They will allow you to exercise your free speech in a cage.
	You can go several blocks away from the convention center.
	This is done every one of these conventions for as long as I've been covering these things.
	You can go to another area that is far, far away where nobody will see or hear you.
	And you can get into a cage and they'll even provide you with a microphone.
	And you can just talk to your heart's delight.
	That's what's going on with Twitter.
	That's what's going on with so-called free speech.
	Put you in a cage, you can talk as much as you want, in an area where nobody can hear you.
	If a tree falls in the forest, right?
	But I have consistently proven, says Brian, that free speech is not the case of all on X. Musk's X frequently takes down posts and squelches free speech according to whatever standards they now have as to what is considered to be free speech and what is not.
	And again, I've talked about that, and Knights of the Storm have talked about it.
	It happens all the time.
	It has also been reported that Musk has complied with more foreign government demands for information on Twitter than his predecessors did.
	He puts out the Twitter files to show what Jack Dorsey was doing under his regime, but he's doing the same thing.
	Or more.
	It doesn't matter, however, to the conservative right who only view free speech from the perspective that they can say whatever they want on Twitter now, whereas they couldn't before.
	I've always said that free speech is bigger than just one public square, even if Musk had set up free speech.
	That's not the whole enchilada that's there.
	And even the cases where one of them is censored.
	They will still give Musk a free pass, and they will say that it must have happened, listen to this, without his knowledge.
	Does that sound familiar?
	Does that sound like somebody you know?
	As a matter of fact, it was Alex Jones who said that, and he points it out.
	He says, this was the case recently where Naomi Wolf was on the Alex Jones show, and one of her comments on X about that was set on that show was deleted.
	I have no idea what that was.
	And this was Alex Jones' response, and he snapshots it.
	See if you can pull that up, Travis.
	Editor's note.
	From Alex Jones' experience, Dr. Naomi Wolf's removal from X is not Elon Musk.
	But instead, it's moles that are still in his organization that have yet to be purged.
	Is that right?
	Or is he just making this stuff up?
	You know, we have seen this over and over again.
	It's not Trump who's pushing the vaccine.
	It's Gates.
	The Trump vaccine is good, right?
	That's why they're admitting the new forced inoculations coming next year will actually maim and kill a lot of people because Bill Gates knows he can't hide it.
	That's why Trump is taking control of the process saying he's going to have an early vaccine from a company that doesn't make one that is so dangerous or that doesn't change our DNA.
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing, but I understand what he's doing.
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
	Gates goes, trust my vaccine but don't trust the CDC's vaccine.
	And then I went and looked up the ones that Trump's looking at.
	They're very weak, attenuated, classic viruses.
	Total lie.
	With a very low amount of adjuvant in it.
	Total lie.
	And what is adjuvant?
	It makes your body have an autoimmune response.
	The squalene or the mercury or the aluminum to trigger that.
	And so yeah, Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks.
	Can we take a little bit of a attenuated, you know, microwaved or radiated, uh, COVID deal?
	Absolutely.
	He's just making it up, choking on his own words.
	Like, For decades, he warned people about the health effects, autism, and other things like that, these adjuvants.
	And now he says, you can take it for Trump.
	He's telling people, it's going to be this attenuated or microwaved or whatever pathogen or whatever virus.
	You're going to do that with a virus that hasn't even been isolated, Alex?
	You knew that it was mRNA.
	You knew that it wasn't even some pathogen that was attenuated or killed.
	It was mRNA.
	No, it's just sycophancy.
	It's pure sycophancy.
	And that's what he's doing with this.
	So he gets censored because of something that Naomi Wolf says.
	And he says, it's not Trump.
	It's moles that have been left behind in his organization that have yet to be purged.
	But don't worry, he's going to fix all of that stuff.
	This is just Lies and sycophancy.
	This is the way that it always was when I was there.
	He would say anything to suck up to billionaires like Trump and Musk.
	And to appease the crowd that loves them, that sees them as saviors.
	This is why I say, isn't it amazing that, you know, we're going to talk about Durov and Musk and Zuckerberg and Trump, you know, are these billionaires with their social media companies, these or their political connections, are they going to save us?
	Well, yes, let's imagine that they will.
	Because we've seen how this plays out in the movies.
	The CIA writes the scripts for Hollywood.
	Here's the scenario, and it's a scenario like they're planning to pull on us.
	But then we see in the movie that there is one man, a hero, who comes out and saves us all.
	And we want to believe that life is like that CIA story.
	And we have CIA people, like Alex, pushing that stuff to us.
	So again, is he an elitist?
	Is he a technocrat like Musk?
	You know, 100 biological kids and all the rest of the stuff?
	Perhaps.
	But you understand that there's another aspect of this which is this full-on arresting people, sending them to jail for three years because you posted something on Facebook?
	And this is to intimidate these billionaires to make sure that they're going to toe the line, that they're going to partner with the government.
	This is sending a big message to Musk and to Zuckerberg and to anybody that owns anything like Rumble.
	It's to send a message to them.
	This is seen as a political move by France to squelch the speech of all those who've been kicked off of social media platforms such as YouTube and who had found refuge on Telegram.
	Again, a move to shut down dissent.
	Anybody who dissents from their agenda.
	Brian Shalhavi says, I for one am highly skeptical about the motives and the actions of big tech billionaires.
	Well, good.
	We should always be skeptical of their motives.
	And we should know that they're not good guys.
	But that doesn't matter with this issue, just like it doesn't matter if I agree with what they're saying in terms of speech.
	I have to support the principle of free speech when it comes to things that are political or scientific or religious or any of these other things.
	You don't have to agree.
	You just have to only want to keep the public square open.
	Which, by the way, is not happening on Twitter, as you saw with Alex.
	Even though Alex wants to make excuses for this, that is not what is happening on Twitter.
	Again, I've always opposed Musk, even when I was working there, and Alex was licking his boots as much as he could.
	It was disgusting, the sycophancy.
	But I always saw him as a technocrat.
	I always saw him as a transhumanist, and that is what he is!
	Look at his picture!
	He's even got a picture of himself with a Baphomet on his chest and a Halloween costume and an upside-down satanic cross.
	Yeah, don't believe me?
	Look at him.
	This is what he wants to show himself as.
	So, Durov, as Brian Shalhavi points out, was also a member of the Young Global Leaders for the World Economic Forum.
	He says there's no doubt that Telegram was a powerful resource during the COVID scam.
	He said, it was my primary go-to source to find videos of people who were killed and crippled by Trump's COVID-19 quote-unquote vaccines.
	And videos banned on platforms like Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and other places most frequently ended up on Telegram.
	And that's the whole point.
	Why did they go after him first?
	Because he has the most free speech platform.
	Not Musk.
	Telegram.
	That's why he had to be made an example of.
	And that tells us what this is truly about.
	It's not about how many kids, you know, have been fathered through his sperm donations.
	It's not about his being honored by the World Economic Forum and maybe being a part of that.
	It's about the fact that, for whatever reason, it was the freest of the social media platforms and they can't have that.
	Brian says, I continue to use it today as one of the few social media platforms that allow me to publish my work.
	And to turn off comments, thereby silencing my enemies.
	So, he says, if it's true that Telegram has become a hiding place for pedophiles and child sex traffickers, and that Telegram is unwilling to spend the money it needs to spend to moderate and to clean up this garbage, then it's high time for Dorov to get his act together and stop illegal content from being posted on his platform.
	Let me just ask you, if you think that's really the case, don't you think they would formally file criminal charges?
	Don't you think they would attack him in the press?
	Don't you think they would say, here's what he's doing, here's a proof of this, we want you to fix it, or we're going to enact our 6% fine on you, on your global revenue, or all this?
	There's a lot of different things that they could have done.
	Instead what they did was they kidnapped him, and they're using him as a hostage.
	They're using him in a terroristic way.
	Because terror is using a violence or the threat of violence in order to achieve your political goals.
	To strike fear in the heart of other people to achieve your political goals.
	That's what France is doing.
	That's what Europe is doing.
	That's what the U.S.
	is doing.
	This is nothing other than terrorism.
	It's not even censorship.
	It's terrorism.
	So, again, The purpose of this is to intimidate all of the platforms so they can ramp up, even faster, the kind of draconian censorship that we've seen with Keir Starmer in the UK.
	The kind of stuff that Conspiracy Theory Breton has been doing.
	Theory Breton going around boasting to everybody, we're going to arrest you for this.
	And the same thing they're doing in the UK.
	They want to arrest everybody.
	Now we're at the stage where they're not just doing censorship And de-platforming.
	They're throwing people in jail.
	From the person who puts one post up on Facebook in the UK, to the CEO of one of the biggest social media companies.
	We should be focusing not on Durov.
	We should not be focusing on whether or not Telegram is a good thing, or even what free speech is.
	We know what tyranny is.
	And tyranny, the face of tyranny, is what we see in the UK, in France, in the EU.
	We know what tyranny is.
	And we need to start opposing that and calling it out for what it is.
	Because if we don't call it out, they're going to apply this censorship and propaganda and they're going to do it just like they did in 2020.
	Zuckerberg claims he now regrets censoring Americans.
	Said he was pressured to shut down people who were talking about COVID-19.
	Pressured by Biden and Harris.
	To stop talk about quote-unquote science.
	Zuckerberg just admitted three things, said the House Judiciary Committee on Twitter.
	Said number one, Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook to censor Americans.
	Number two, Facebook censored Americans.
	And number three, Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story that was coming out of the New York Post.
	The House Judiciary GOP says big win for free speech.
	No it isn't!
	Nothing has changed.
	You haven't done anything, House GOP.
	What this is, is owning the other side.
	We're owning the libs.
	We're owning Facebook.
	We're owning Biden and Harris.
	But you're not defending our freedoms.
	You're not putting any kind of wall against this kind of tyranny.
	You're doing nothing.
	It disgusts me to see what the Republicans are doing.
	So now global governance of speech is being run by the intimidation game and the EU.
	But they think that's a big win to have Zuckerberg say that stuff.
	And it wasn't a big win for Musk to show the Twitter files either.
	We knew all that stuff was happening.
	We didn't see the We didn't need to see the documents.
	We'd already seen the effects.
	We could discern where that was coming from before we ever saw those documents.
	And the point is, is that nothing was ever done.
	So when you put the documents out there, and nothing is ever done to constrain the government, nothing is ever done by the Republicans in government to restrain the government from being
	Censorious tyrants when they never do anything about it when they just all they want is to score political points That's why I am NOT interested in these politicians whatsoever They're not our saviors and neither are these billionaires who own the social media companies Elon Musk says free thought project monetizes free speech in order to control it Yep
	After buying Twitter and forcing users to pay for free speech or to be buried by the algorithm, he's now cracking down on criticism of Israel and any other quote-unquote free speech that he disagrees with.
	So they say users of X, and be conservative users of X really, seem deeply misguided.
	They imagine that Musk is the savior of free speech.
	He is not.
	He's simply the latest pioneer in monetizing speech.
	That's right.
	He's talked about, you know, for the AI models, which he's very involved in, they need big compute.
	They need to have access to the data that is going to be the interactions and the comments and the things that people are doing.
	They need that.
	They need to feed off of people.
	These AI technocrats, you think of them as parasites.
	They have to feed off of humans.
	If they feed off of other AI, then they get the mad cow disease type of thing, right?
	It gets stupid really fast.
	So they need to keep feeding on humans.
	So, you know, he's talked about how he wants to turn Twitter into a hive mind.
	That's his term.
	And then of course he has political aspirations.
	He became the world's richest man by crony capitalism and politics.
	So all of these things are in view with Elon Musk.
	In addition to his technocracy and his transhumanism perspectives.
	If you don't pay Musk, the algorithms make sure that you get minimal reach.
	And even if you do pay him.
	If he doesn't like what you're doing, then he makes sure that you don't get much of a reach.
	Speech on X is still a privilege.
	It's just one that you can now pay for.
	And like all privileges, says Free Thought Project, it is on license from the owner.
	Musk can withdraw that privilege and withdraw it selectively whenever he thinks someone or something is harming his interests, whether it's direct or indirect.
	And again, like I said, I've always criticized Musk.
	His technocracy, his transhumanism.
	Even at Infowars, I'm sure that, you know, he knows that.
	And he's threatened users with suspension.
	And they focus on his focus on Israel.
	If you use the phrase, from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
	Well, we're going to stop that.
	Stop you from saying that on Twitter.
	If you talk about decolonization in reference to Israel, that'll get you banned or shadow banned.
	The Israel lobby is also pushing hard for a ban on the words Zionism and Zionist.
	And it won't be long before X like Meta cracks down on these terms as well, he says.
	And so, as he points out, you're not going to be allowed to discuss these things even in a positive way, right?
	And so it's very much like what you see people doing on YouTube.
	Well, I want to talk about the thing, you know, but I can't really mention the vaccine per se.
	Even people who talked about it and praised it got kicked off of YouTube.
	So they just have to be very careful about using those words.
	Billionaires are not there to protect free speech.
	They got to be billionaires by being very good at making money.
	They love money.
	Do you believe Jesus Christ when he said, the love of money is the root of all evil?
	He was telling you the truth.
	And these people are exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G. Me being on Musk's Twitter, or X, makes about as much sense as me being on Trump's Truth Social platform, quite frankly.
	They're both equally authoritarian.
	The two tribes are there to offer the pretense of a battle of ideas, the pretense of competition, the pretense of a choice at election time, the pretense of freedom.
	They look hostile to each other, but when push comes to shove, they are united in their support for oligarchy and They're united in their opposition to genuine free speech.
	They're united in their opposition to real democracy and liberty and to meaningful pluralism to an open society, says Free Thought Project.
	And when we look at this, I think a good example is it's not just It's not just the people running the platforms, but it's really kind of this mob effect that happens on Twitter, happens on Gab, happens on Truth Social.
	One person who is experiencing that right now in the extreme.
	We saw it happen with Kyle Rittenhouse, and now Lila Rose of Live Action is getting that same kind of treatment.
	She had a real problem with Trump talking about reproductive rights.
	And so she put this up and said, uh, there is no such thing as a reproductive rights and reproductive freedom.
	This is what we're talking about.
	Ripping babies to pieces.
	And she's actually doing what I've said the Republicans would do if they were serious about saving babies lives, they would actually show the truth about what this is.
	And so when she put this up and criticized Trump.
	The Magatards came out of the woodwork attacking her.
	Now she's on the back foot getting kind of defensive about it.
	They called her a grifter.
	They called her everything you can think of because she criticized Trump because he doesn't want to stop this.
	He doesn't care about what you see here.
	He simply wants to win.
	He wants money.
	He wants power.
	He wants sex.
	And he doesn't care about those babies.
	He doesn't care about anything.
	He certainly doesn't care about you.
	He doesn't care about the January the 6th people.
	He didn't mention them for six months.
	He could have pardoned them two weeks before he left office.
	He ripped them off, he used them for his own personal good, and he discarded them like he would one of his prostitutes or one of his wives.
	The MAGO echo chamber on Twitter has come after her now because she had the audacity to point out that Trump is using the left's code words about reproductive rights.
	She said, that's not going to buy you any votes.
	It's only going to alienate people.
	But he doesn't care.
	Because he's a deeply wounded narcissist incapable of acting except out of his own perceived self-interest or revenge.
	And he's looking at this as a calculation that, well, you know, I gotta win by hook or by crook.
	I'll make alliances with the devil if I have to.
	Because, folks, that's exactly what he has done.
	I will never vote for that man.
	Never.
	You can do what you want.
	But I'm going to tell you, don't follow him into another January the 6th.
	Don't follow him or that clown Steve Bannon or Alex Jones who pushed this January the 6th stuff with a bunch of lies from the CIA.
	Don't follow them into a civil war.
	It's just, you know, that's what they're trying to push.
	All right, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	They're doing what?
	In the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have the David Night Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	This is the David Night Show.
	Thank you on rock fan Brandon Bennett.
	Thank you very much for the tip says god bless you David.
	I will appreciate that Thank you on rumble Radis bro.
	Thank you very much says Ross and Durov are held accountable for running platforms But politicians and their goons are never held accountable for their real death destruction and chaos that they cause that's right I think that's the big tell I mean, look at what they did to Ross Ulbrich.
	When you look at what they were saying about cryptocurrency, well, you know, cryptocurrencies is about nothing but doing bad things and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's like, okay, compare it to your cash or whatever.
	You know, when they start making these types of extreme claims and doing it at the same time, we see them ramping up censorship like we've never seen before.
	It's pretty obvious, isn't it?
	What this is really about.
	Isn't that a tell?
	I mean, it's exactly like, How obvious it was with the pandemic.
	Doing something that they talked about doing, practice doing, for 20 years.
	And then telling people the same kind of lies that they did every year about the flu shot.
	Oh, look at all the flu cases we got, but don't worry, we're gonna, you know.
	And then telling people that your mask doesn't protect you, it protects other people, just like they had told people for decades, your shot doesn't, it doesn't matter what your shot is.
	We could vaccinate you for flu or measles.
	It doesn't matter.
	Your shot does not protect you.
	It protects other people and vice versa.
	So everybody's got to get it.
	And they were saying all that kind of stuff.
	We knew where they were going with all this stuff.
	And it's the same thing with this censorship.
	We know what they want.
	Let's not pretend that we don't know what they want.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	And also, Angela Oswald.
	Thank you, all of you.
	Before we get into this next thing, I just want to tell people about Patriot Bee Best, one of our sponsors.
	They have done what they can to try to educate people about the natural food chain, and they've done a great deal at Patriot Bee Best.
	Go there and check out the links.
	They've got a link there.
	Why is our American bee population under attack?
	And not only that, but you'll find all kinds of things about education, engagement, real change, things that you can do in your area.
	To facilitate the health of the bees, which is going to facilitate our food supply.
	We've really got to focus on the local food chain and local production.
	So they've got a couple of things there.
	You can subscribe to their buzz.
	And they have two levels there.
	They have a worker bee subscription level.
	You can get educational information, advocacy opportunities, bee friendly products, bee rescue activities and more.
	Or you can go up to the queen bee level.
	And you get bonus content on patriotic topics relating to restoring and reinforcing American values.
	Join to learn about restoring the health of the American bee population.
	And if you get to the queen level, you'll find out how to restore the health of America as well.
	Check them out at PatriotBeeBest.com.
	Do subscribe and see all the cool bee-related products they have to offer.
	And again, that is PatriotBeeBest.com.
	Check out the videos they've got there.
	Find out what you can do to help facilitate agriculture in your area.
	You may be needing to grow that yourself in the very near future.
	That's what we're working on here in the Knight family.
	Karen has done a great job in terms of going from never having done this before to running, growing quite a few things, getting the chickens going.
	And so far, we haven't had any predator attacks on our chickens.
	We hope that stays that way.
	We had really bad luck with that in Texas, but at least this time we have started getting some eggs from the first batch of chickens already.
	We didn't even make it that far in Texas before the predators got to our chickens.
	We did feed them into adulthood, so we spent a lot of money on food.
	But we never did get any eggs from them in Texas.
	Let's talk about what is happening with Tim Walz in terms of a ban on Christian teachers.
	This is not going to happen, however, until July of next year.
	And so this is something people are not going to see for the most part until after this election.
	But it really shows the heart and the attitude and the politics of Tim Waltz.
	It is totalitarian and unconstitutional, say some of the people there in Minnesota.
	His ban on faithful Christians from teaching in Minnesota's schools, and it's not just the public schools.
	It's private schools and colleges.
	The report of the Federalist warns that he is poised to make similar bigoted, totalitarian, unconstitutional policies for the entire nation should he be elected vice president.
	Again, these are new rules that will go into effect July 2025.
	They will, quote, ban practicing Christians, Jews, and Muslims from teaching in public schools according to the
	According to the report from The Federalist, it is because under the plans of this governor, the state will demand that teacher license applicants will have to affirm transgenderism, and they will have to affirm Marxist racism as well.
	The critical race theory stuff.
	And so if you don't do that, you're not going to get a teacher's license.
	If you don't have a teacher's license, you can't teach in public schools, you can't teach in private schools.
	And as I said before, they're going to apply this even in universities.
	The rules will demand, quote, the teacher fosters an environment that ensures student identities such as race, ethnicity, national origin, language, sex, and gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, physical, developmental, emotional ability, socioeconomic class, And that religious beliefs are historically and socially contextualized.
	Now what does that last one mean?
	When you talk about religion being socially contextualized, or anything for that matter, what they're saying is that this thing that is socially contextualized is being done as a means of controlling people.
	And so what he's saying is, your religion is nothing.
	It is just a construct to control people.
	Well, that's what his policies are.
	What he's saying is, you're going to affirm these atheistic principles.
	Because somebody following this, whether again, whether they are Christian or Jew or Muslim, they don't believe that that is a social construct.
	They believe that it's coming from God.
	That's their sincere religious belief.
	You're not going to allow that.
	You're going to make them deny that sincere religious belief.
	So this is where Tim Walz is coming from.
	Universities must now provide anti-Christian training.
	Upper Midwest Law Center said that some Christian universities will obey, others will not, but they will disobey quietly and then sue only when they are punished.
	The report from the Federalist said faithful members of the world's largest and oldest religions cannot in good conscience affirm these sexual orientations and gender identities and this Marxist racism because it is a denial of their religion.
	It's a denial of God as they see it.
	The state action actually is called compelled speech, said the report.
	It's clearly unconstitutional, but they are forcing you to essentially take a loyalty oath to Tim Walz's Marxist principles.
	Straight out of Mao.
	Again, Xi Van Fleet, her book, Mao's America, A Survivor's Warning, she said, I saw all of this stuff, all the anti-racism that is, that's nothing other than the Mao struggle sessions.
	It's exactly what that is.
	They're essentially requiring people to affirm these ideas that they don't really believe, and in many cases to do it as a condition of being a teacher, and to get a license to teach, even in a private school.
	You can't force that kind of speech.
	You can't require adherence to ideas that aren't believed.
	You can't force people to say 2 plus 2 equals 5, but tyrants will always do that.
	That's why Orwell put it in there.
	The Wall Street Journal found that ethnic studies, quote-unquote, demands in Minnesota that it mirrors the demands for affirming all kinds of LGBT deviations.
	Fourth graders must identify the processes and the impacts of colonization.
	Here's the Marxist aspects of it.
	And examine how discrimination and oppression of various racial and ethnic groups have produced resistance movements.
	That's the fourth grade.
	In high school, students are told to develop an analysis of racial capitalism and of anti-blackness, and are taught to view themselves as members of radicalized hierarchies based on dominant European beauty standards.
	Boy, this is hate, division, Marxism, being inculcated by Tim Waltz and his government, even intruding into private institutions.
	This is why you shouldn't have to have licenses to teach.
	Massachusetts town is now blocking Bible study from a library and tried to censor the pastor's newspaper ad after they blocked him.
	He tried to go to a park and they said no.
	Told the newspaper to shut him down.
	And this is interesting because, you know, look at what has happened to libraries.
	Nobody wants to go to a library and get a book because nobody reads books anymore.
	And so libraries are now something of a town square.
	for entertainment or for meetings or whatever, drag queens and that type of thing.
	And so this is what is happening in a Massachusetts town that's not being named yet, but the American Center for Law and Justice is getting ready to file a lawsuit.
	The Massachusetts town denied a pastor the use of the public library meeting space for Bible study, but they also demanded that a local newspaper pull an ad that he had paid for to have an alternate meeting in a public park.
	So, this is what we have to look forward to if we're going to allow these tyrants to shut down free speech and the free exercise of religion.
	They had initially approved the request the library did for the bi-weekly meetings.
	And then they said, well, we have been contacted by the town administration and you can't use this for your bi-weekly, bi-monthly Bible studies.
	So then he tried to organize at a local park.
	And they said, uh, you don't have the proper approval for social function in the park.
	And so we're going to stop you from even advertising about that.
	Well, the ACLJ.
	So this is very reminiscent of a court case that we challenged in one 30 years ago called Lamb's Chapel versus some school district.
	In that case, the U.S.
	Supreme Court explained that the government violates the First Amendment when it denies access to a speaker solely to suppress the point of view he espouses in an otherwise includable subject.
	The court ruled in our favor and held that a public school's decision to exclude a church from using its meeting spaces to show a Christian film violated the First Amendment.
	They said the same thing is true here of the park.
	The Supreme Court has emphasized that streets and parks which have in memorial been held in trust for the use of the public and time out of mind have been used for the purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, discussing public questions.
	In these quintessential public forums, the government may not prohibit all communicative activity.
	This is the same way as social media.
	This is very much like the case in 1946, Marsh v. Alabama, where they told a woman she, or man, I forget which it was, couldn't hand out tracts, religious tracts, in the public square.
	It was a town that was owned by corporations.
	That is privately owned.
	What are we hearing about social media?
	Same thing.
	But the Supreme Court said, even if the public square is privately owned, you can't shut down free speech.
	That's what we're talking about.
	This is the same principle that we're talking about on social media.
	The Digital Public Square is what Jack Dorsey called it over and over again.
	And yet, nobody will talk about that.
	Nobody will talk about it.
	Again, that is very distinct and different from the court cases that have shut down people getting on a soapbox in a mall and doing something.
	Because a mall is retail space.
	It is not the public square.
	Even in the common areas, they rent that out.
	And so you can no more set up something there than you could set it up in a department store inside the mall.
	So there's two very different things.
	And so when we talk about the abortion thing and reproductive rights, Texas had, two years ago, 50,783 abortions.
	And 2023, it went down to 62.
	Is that worth doing something about?
	2023 it went down to 62. Is that worth doing something about? Should we see that as a victory?
	And I think that we should and agree with the idea that we should have federalism though at the same time.
	The federal government does not have and should not have the ability to do everything.
	And crimes like murder rightfully belong in a local jurisdiction.
	But from a constitutional standpoint, but from a pragmatic standpoint, you can stop abortions in Texas.
	You can go from 51,000 to 62,000.
	But you're not going to be able to do that in California, even with a federal law.
	We've already seen how that works with medical marijuana.
	Let's get real.
	Let's understand how the real world is going to work.
	And let's understand that even if you pass a law banning it in California and New York, they're still going to do it.
	And they'll do it with the assistance of the state government.
	And if the state government is assisting people to kill babies, you're not going to stop it with the federal government.
	But, When the liberals get in, they say you can kill any baby at any time for any reason at any age, then the conservative states, the Republican states, will obey that.
	We've seen that as well.
	And they will let babies be killed.
	They will not intervene to protect babies' lives.
	The liberal states will intervene to kill babies, but the other states will not intervene to kill.
	That's the reality of what's happening.
	And it's a constitutional reality.
	Let's accept the victories.
	And let's say that we can reduce the abortions, and even if the people go to another state to do it, at least the bloodshed is not on our hands.
	We've done what we can, because that is what we can do.
	And so, again, I said Lila Rose is getting the Kyle Rittenhouse treatment.
	She says, Trump and Vance have recently said that he would veto a national ban on abortion Again, it's not constitutional.
	That's not why he's doing it though.
	And what we saw when he put out, women are going to love my stance on reproductive rights.
	He's cheering abortion.
	He's not taking a constitutional stand.
	He's not taking a pragmatic stand.
	He said they support access to abortion pills.
	60% of all abortions.
	I think the federal government could control that because the federal government does control the male.
	And most of this stuff is being done by mail.
	They think that it is California's right to permit abortion up to birth.
	But if states like Arizona ban most abortions, that they have gone too far.
	And he said that she's quoting Trump and boy, they are coming after her again.
	I just like to do it with Kyle.
	Um, and he caved.
	Due to their increasing pro-abortion position, Trump and Vance are stretching the lesser of two evils voting strategy to an untenable position.
	They're making it impossible for pro-life voters to support them.
	Being less passionate about killing babies than Harrison Waltz is not enough.
	It's not enough to be less passionate about getting people mandated to be vaxxed than Harrison and Biden or whatever.
	Look, that's the other thing too.
	We're not just talking about abortion.
	Look at the people that were aborted.
	The adults, the young adults, the children, the toddlers.
	All of them killed by Operation Warp Speed.
	There should be some accountability for that.
	Only 61% of gun owners support Trump.
	Why?
	Because they know what he did to the Second Amendment.
	And they hold him accountable.
	The Christians still haven't caught on for the most part.
	And they come after anybody who criticizes that backstabbing Benedict Donald.
	Have a good day.
	Goodbye.
	Bye!
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲