Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 23, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:58

The David Knight Show - 08/23/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	to free minds.
	you You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 23rd of August, year of our Lord, 2020.
	Well, we're going to take a look at some late-breaking news about RFK Jr.
	and Trump, but we're also going to take a look at the connection to Bilderberg for all of these candidates, and there's quite a few connections to that.
	We're going to take a look at what some of the people have been saying at the DNC.
	Dilation and Courtage Convention.
	We will look at a very troubling report about a journalist who was arrested under terrorism charges for speaking out against the terrorism, new terrorism law affecting free speech and the free press in the UK.
	And we're also going to take a look at fluoride.
	The government has finally admitted that it's bad.
	But the press has a very interesting way of covering up for it.
	And regardless of whether it's bad, or regardless of whether or not you believe the cover-up, the CDC wants to continue it.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, it's not much of a secret anymore.
	Everybody's been talking about it for a couple of days here.
	The fact that RFK Jr.
	is going to suspend his campaign.
	As a matter of fact, he's in Arizona.
	He's on the ballot in Arizona.
	But then this paperwork was just put out a few hours ago saying that this is done on the 22nd of August.
	statement of withdrawal voluntarily from the ballot so the announcement that's going to happen is at 11 a.m.
	their time it's gonna be 2 p.m.
	Eastern time so to be after this show and then the question is not only is he said no question that he's suspending his campaign again his vice presidential candidate Nicole Shanahan had said well you know we can continue on with this and hope that we get 5% or whatever they're right at 5% now And I guarantee you they're not going to get 5% if they continue on with it.
	This is a phenomenon that we see all the time.
	So I said, this is going to be a really tough year for me because as you get closer and closer to the election, everybody starts buying into this lesser of two evils thing.
	Everybody pretty much leaves these candidates.
	They're not happy with either of the candidates.
	And so for a long time, they'll say, well, I'm not going to, I'm going to go with a third party candidate, but they cave at the last minute.
	And so you typically see the candidates bringing in maybe a third of what they had initially polled at the high point at that.
	And so he's going to finish with a 1 or 2% if he stays in.
	So he wants to cut a deal with Trump.
	And of course, during the Trump convention, and I call it the Trump convention because there's not much left of the Republican Party except for Trump.
	During the Trump convention, he was calling RFK Jr.
	Indication that Trump is like, you know, come join me, it'll be good for you, all that kind of stuff.
	And his son was very upset about that, which would indicate to me that he had signaled to his son that he was going to join Trump at the time.
	I think that's why his son leaked it.
	And then his vice presidential campaign running mate, his vice presidential running mate for his campaign, came out and pretty much said that was what was going to happen.
	But it will not happen until, if it does, after the, well he's going to drop out.
	But what he's going to do, in terms of joining with Trump will not be known precisely until 2 p.m.
	but I think what will happen is at 11 a.m.
	their time he's going to drop out perhaps endorse Trump and then get to speak at the evening convention as I said yesterday but the evening rally but there is a hitch in this that is now emerged We'll take a look at that.
	A source told CNN people close to Kennedy are in talks with Trump's team to endorse him tonight at the rally there in Phoenix.
	Why else would both of them be in Phoenix?
	But a spokesperson for the Kennedys declined to say whether or not he planned to drop out or why he chose Arizona for his speech.
	We've already got the paperwork that's been turned in.
	And I don't know why he would be in Phoenix.
	I mean, it's a big secret, right?
	LOL.
	They think that we don't know with all these things.
	It's just amazing.
	And then, of course, Trump.
	The flattery from Trump.
	It's very telling.
	He's a brilliant guy.
	He's a very smart guy.
	I've known him a very long time.
	I didn't know he was thinking about getting out, but if he is thinking about getting out, certainly I would be open to him getting out.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Just wait until he's been there a short time and Trump can make a better deal with somebody else to replace him, and it'll be a different story then, won't it?
	Last month, during the RNC convention, he called.
	That was the phone call I was talking about.
	And so, it looks increasingly unlikely that he'll be able to make the debate stage when Trump and Harris face off next month, said the local Arizona paper.
	You think so?
	That's what it was designed for.
	Look, as I said from the beginning, all these people were concerned about the election.
	I said we've always had problems with vote counts being dishonest, but I said the biggest problem is ballot access and debate access.
	If you rig the ballots by who gets to run, if you rig the debates, then the election is rigged even before you start counting the votes.
	And then, of course, Trump added a whole new wrinkle of corruption with a vote by mail because of the fake pandemic and lockdown.
	But RFK Jr.
	had this to say yesterday about ballot access.
	I thought it went really well.
	I mean, I shouldn't be here right now.
	This is a court case.
	In Chicago, talking about their commitment to voting rights.
	And, well, they're spending, you know, tens, maybe hundreds of millions of dollars.
	to keep me off the ballot.
	You know, I was raised in the Democratic Party.
	My father, Robert Kennedy, my uncle John Kennedy, at a time when the primary thrust of the Democratic Party in that era was to make sure that every American could vote.
	There were people in our country who were being denied the right to vote, that every American could vote for the person they wanted.
	There's a million people in this country who've signed petitions trying to get me on the ballot.
	145,000, at least, people here in New York say they want to see me on the ballot.
	Why is the Democratic Party trying to disenfranchise those people?
	What's happened to the party?
	I don't think my father would recognize this party, and I don't think my uncle would recognize this party.
	Sorry about that noise on there.
	New York Post, you need to up your game.
	Maybe they got that from somebody else.
	I think they were hitting their mic or something.
	But yeah, he's exactly right.
	It's not just his father and his uncle, RFK and JFK.
	Founders wouldn't recognize this country.
	They allowed multiple parties there.
	We didn't get to a two-party system.
	Until after the Civil War, where we consolidated power into one party, into the Republican Party at that point in time.
	But, yeah, it was... If you're going to control the ballot, if you're not going to let people have access to any of these candidates...
	You know, Dr. Shiva, the Libertarian Party candidate, the Green Party candidate.
	You don't have to support a particular candidate to just say, well, we ought to have, if we're going to have elections, let's have open elections.
	Let's have honest elections instead of curated and controlled elections, curated and controlled by the Republicans and Democrats.
	They've maintained this duopoly with their lawsuits and their laws that they put on.
	I mean, they have kept everybody else off the ballot.
	It is disgusting.
	That's where my contempt for this electoral system operates.
	If you look at it, you cannot help but have contempt.
	And so now he's participated in it.
	Now he's got his object lesson.
	His idealism and his rose-colored glasses have been removed, slapped off of his face as he's been slapped with lawsuit after lawsuit to keep him off the ballot.
	Same with Dr. Shiva that I was talking to the other day.
	And as he pointed out, you know, all of the ballots ought to be open.
	If you got an issue, even with Dr. Shiva, a citizenship issue that some people have an issue with, and that is something, you know, what is the meaning of the 14th Amendment and so forth.
	And so, if you want to have a debate about that, fine.
	But allow people to run for office, and then if you decide, well, they're not qualified, and we need to have a clarification for that.
	I think we need to clarify all that stuff about natural-born citizens and what rights they have and everything with these open borders.
	That all needs to be a discussion and there needs to be, you know, votes for Dr. Shiva would bring that into where we could have a discussion of that important issue.
	So he said at least 145,000 people in New York have signed something.
	They'd like to see me on the ballot.
	He's saying that outside the courtroom there in New York.
	Why is the Democrat Party trying to disenfranchise those people?
	And he says, my father and uncle would not recognize this party.
	They wouldn't recognize this country either.
	Commenters said things like, the party of democracy, quote unquote, removed their candidate via a coup, installed a nominee without a single vote, is trying to imprison their main political opponent and keep any other potentially viable alternatives off the ballot.
	And of course, that last thing is something they've been doing for a very long time.
	The Democrat Party in Florida shut down the primaries there.
	They only wanted to have Biden on the ballot.
	And then they decided, nah, I think we'll have Lala on the ballots, kick Biden out of there.
	Trump will be attending the rally late tonight in Glendale, Arizona.
	But there is a hitch.
	It's not a foregone conclusion that he will endorse Trump.
	Jack Posobiec, Sources close to the RFK campaign say he has not yet decided on dropping out and endorsing Trump.
	There is an internal war that is happening within the camp with Nicole, his vice presidential candidate, urging him to join forces with Trump, but his wife, Cheryl Hines, urging him to just drop off the ballot in swing states and not endorse.
	So he's got a problem.
	You know, RFK Jr.
	has got to choose between his running mate and his mate.
	What are we going to do?
	She loves me, she loves me not.
	This is really like high school student council elections, isn't it?
	The melodrama.
	But I think that his wife has shown that she kind of rules the roost.
	Do you remember 2021?
	Do you remember December 2021, the Christmas party, December 2021?
	As RFK Jr.
	had spent the year warning people about these shots and these Trump shots, his wife, as part of their Christmas party, sent out invitations telling any potential guests that they had to get COVID shots and prove it.
	And they also had to take a COVID test before they came to the party at RFK Jr.' 's house.
	That was widely reported.
	This is a People magazine thing here.
	Politico also talked, many, many outlets talked about it.
	We talked about it.
	I talked about it.
	Kennedy had said, or they say in People, he left guests surprised when his party invitation asked them to be vaccinated and take COVID tests before coming to his home.
	He's kind of like Joe Rogan.
	Joe Rogan was doing the same thing.
	You couldn't come into his studio unless you had COVID tests and things like that.
	I don't know if he required vaccines or not, but Joe Rogan was totally on board with this, the cooties superstition that they called a pandemic.
	Uh, I guess I'm not always the boss in my own house, said RFK Jr.
	Politico also reported that the event was for Chrissy Heinz friends within the entertainment industry.
	Uh, and, uh, Kennedy was not in the loop about what the invitations had listed.
	So can you imagine the discussion that they're having at home?
	Um, no, you can't hang out with Donald.
	You, you, you can't endorse him.
	Just imagine what Larry David would say.
	I'd never work in that town again.
	She probably won't anyway.
	But RFK Jr., this is the way Revolver puts it, RFK Jr.
	on the verge of earth-shattering political move, making it nearly impossible for Democrats to steal the election.
	Do you believe that?
	I don't believe that for a minute.
	He's got that totally wrong, I think.
	Look, this is all going back to the stolen voter ID.
	They always pull this up and they say, well, you know, you're stealing voters from the Republicans, or you're stealing voters from the Democrats, or whatever.
	There are some people who may do that.
	I don't think that's going to be the case.
	Not much at all.
	As I said before, most people Unless they are hardcore supporters of the independent or third-party candidate, most people at the very end will go, well, I really hate this guy, but I just, the other guy is so bad.
	I just got to vote for this guy.
	I know he's not perfect, but I got to vote.
	You know the drill, right?
	Everybody, you hear that from everybody.
	So I don't think that's going to be the case.
	The reason that it falls away in the polls, to being only about a third or so in the number of people who said they're going to vote for the independent or third-party candidate, is because those people don't have any real commitment.
	And the people who have a real commitment are, if that candidate drops out, they're not going to vote.
	As Kim Block said when I had him on, he had been hired by the Trump administration, or the Trump team I should say, campaign.
	To go back and audit the stuff.
	He said they had a lot of ballots where there was no vote for president.
	They would vote down-ballot.
	Republican ballots who are voting down-ballot but not voting for president.
	That's the kind of thing you'll have if somebody is really repulsed and there's not another choice out there.
	So I don't think these voters belong to Republicans or Democrats if they're really going to vote for Kennedy.
	And the people who are really going to vote for Kennedy is a small fraction of the 5% that you see there right now.
	It's the stolen vote fantasy.
	So I think that's really what's going to happen.
	And I don't think it's going to have that much Uh, of an issue.
	If you had people who are totally committed to RFK Jr, they were committed to him because they believe that he was, uh, committed to certain policies and that neither Trump nor Biden nor Lala were committed to those policies.
	And they're just going to see him as somebody who sold out.
	And what did he sell out for?
	Well, NBC is saying, is RFK Jr.
	trying to angle to be Trump's health secretary?
	First of all, I don't think that'll ever happen.
	That's too valuable a position.
	Trump held out and used RFK Jr.
	to get millions of dollars from big pharmaceutical companies.
	Maybe if There was this implication that RFK Jr.
	is going to endorse, if he endorses Trump, then there's this fear from big pharmaceutical companies that he would actually be running all of HHS.
	Can you imagine the tens of millions of dollars that Trump could squeeze out of them?
	And then put somebody else in there?
	Because I think that's what this is truly about.
	He has advocated for dismantling core functions of HHS.
	Just get rid of all of it.
	For weeks, Kennedy's campaign has floated his interest in a cabinet position in a future Trump White House, while publicly denying that he would accept it.
	J.D.
	Vance said on Wednesday that there was no quid pro quo deal to offer Kennedy a cabinet post in exchange for the endorsement and that any conversations, that's in spite of the leaked video, that any conversations about a future role would be separate.
	And of course if they put him in as HHS secretary Remember Alex Azar, the CEO of Eli Lilly, got that position after Pfizer and Eli Lilly and a lot of other pharmaceutical companies kicked up millions each and did it because Kennedy was called to Trump Tower and said, yeah, we need to have a commission where we're going to look at the safety of vaccines.
	Can you imagine if it was put out that they were going to put Kennedy in charge of HHS, how freaked out Big Pharma would be?
	They would cough up a lot of money.
	HHS Secretary Alex Azar, that Trump put in after the donations from big pharmaceutical companies, left there for four years, all four years.
	The guy who, at the end of January 2020, declared that there was a pandemic emergency.
	He's the one that declared there was an emergency.
	Trump, on Friday the 13th, March the 13th, released the money for the emergency.
	But it was Alex Azar, HHS secretary, who said this is an emergency, the end of January.
	Again, it was the money that was Trump's involvement, the money, the cheerleading, the people that he put in charge of this, like Fauci and Birx and Redfield and all the rest of them.
	But the actual declaration of it was by Alex Azar.
	And Alex Azar described being HHS Secretary.
	He says, it's like having, you're having a shocking amount of power by the stroke of a pen, quote unquote.
	And what did he do with that stroke of the pen?
	Kicked off the emergency when there was no emergency.
	Nobody was dying, not in the US, not in Italy, not in China, not in January of 2020.
	No, nothing.
	It's a full on lie, but he's head of a department that has more than a one and a half trillion with a T budget.
	So do you think that if you can get control of a department that has a budget of trillions would be worth dropping a few million so that you can get back tens of billions?
	That was the calculation for Trump.
	During the transition period, that's exactly the way they worked.
	They gave millions, and they got back tens of billions during warp speed.
	And nobody bothers them.
	Not going to be harassed by the FDA, not by anybody.
	The current secretary, Javier Becerra, was an attorney general of California.
	He doesn't have any connection to anything that's remotely like health, right?
	What was his connection?
	His only connection to health was the fact that he sued the Center for Medical Progress and David Daleiden.
	He continued the suit that Lala had started.
	Kami Lala.
	After the Planned Parenthood whistleblowers on the whistle saying they're killing babies for their body parts.
	And then we find out that they're killing babies for the body parts and the customer, one of the big customers, is the NIH, right there, under the HHS people.
	HHS oversees 13 agencies, including the FDA, the CDC, and the NIH.
	Fauci's, you know, was the N-I-A-I-D, under the NIH.
	On the campaign trail and podcasts and in news interviews, Kennedy has described wanting to dismantle those offices and rebuild them with like-minded fringe figures.
	No, just dismantle them.
	You don't need them.
	You can't find it in the Constitution.
	The founders wouldn't recognize HHS, RFK, all these three letters.
	I remember when they were doing that.
	Oh, we got JFK, now we got RFK, now we got LBJ, and all the rest of this kind of stuff.
	Just stop it.
	Now we've got a plethora of three-letter Agencies as part of their legacy.
	No, the Constitution doesn't recognize any of these agencies.
	There is no authority for the federal government to be involved in food or drugs.
	Or to be involved in your health.
	None whatsoever.
	That should all be a state function.
	It's not in the Constitution.
	It's not in the Constitution for a reason.
	So you don't want to make it serve you.
	See, that's the problem.
	And that's where we are with all of these people.
	Everybody wants a law to control everything.
	To micromanage them, to control their enemies, and to help them.
	And they want these laws to be, everything to be solved in Washington.
	They want to make a federal case out of everything.
	And this is everybody across the political spectrum now, pretty much.
	Even including, in many cases, libertarians now.
	It's amazing to me.
	So we're going to get a lot of government hard because of this.
	The agencies have become sock puppets for the industries that they regulate, says NBC.
	Says NBC.
	Everybody knows it, so why are we continuing on with this charade?
	And so Kennedy said, I'm going to say to the NIH scientists, God bless you all, thank you for your public service, we're going to give infectious disease a break for about eight years.
	So then NBC goes to Dr. Paul Offit, the guy who has been one of the biggest vaccine pushers.
	I guess you could call him a prick.
	But he says, Paul Offit says he will no doubt try to perform studies that prove his views.
	You mean like you do now?
	And to further weaken America's trust in vaccines.
	That's what you're doing, Paul Offit.
	You cherry-pick the studies, you cherry-pick what they're gonna do, you throw away the stuff you don't like, and you've undermined America's trust in vaccines.
	Thank you for doing that.
	Thank you for your service.
	No doubt he'll try to eliminate all mandates.
	Can you imagine?
	Why would we want to eliminate all mandates, Paul Offit?
	Yeah, what mandates?
	Who's your authority for that in the Constitution?
	Do we want to live in a society like that regardless of whether it's in the Constitution or not?
	Is that what we want?
	No.
	That's what Paul Offit wants.
	That's what the pharmaceutical people want.
	They want to force you to buy what they sell.
	And this is what they're doing with everything.
	They want to force you to buy a battery electric vehicle.
	They want to force you to have all electric appliances, whether or not that's what you want.
	It doesn't matter whether the data shows that he's wrong, he's still going to be convinced that he's right.
	Talk about projection.
	This is Offit.
	That's exactly what he does.
	So last year, Kennedy told a group of anti-vaccine doctors and influencers assembled for a health policy roundtable that he would surround himself with dissidents, he said.
	Well look, let's understand that real science is only moved forward by skepticism.
	Prove it.
	Prove it!
	It's not moved forward.
	Science goes backwards.
	It atrophies and dies when you just accept as truth unproven assertions by people in positions of power and influence, people who are at the sacred institutions that you're not allowed to ever question.
	You know what they are.
	We've seen this over and over again.
	No, real science only advances when somebody questions the assumptions.
	And many times there are assumptions that have been there for decades or centuries or even longer.
	When somebody comes along and questions that assumption and then you have real science and you have scientific advancement.
	If the thing is real, it can withstand the questioning.
	So Jeffrey Tucker asks, what's really going on at the federal agencies?
	Years ago as an intern in D.C.
	and long before the agencies all locked their doors to visitors.
	Yeah, that's what we have seen now.
	It is amazing how they have circled the wagon and they have assumed this cloak of secrecy like they were the CIA.
	You look at some of these seminal issues that emerged about the middle of the 20th century.
	One of them is this cloak of secrecy.
	Well, I'm sorry, that's classified type of thing.
	Now everybody is using that, even when they don't do classified work, to not talk to you.
	As a reporter, I would see it all the time when I go around and talk to these people.
	And the other part of it is that they don't want to talk to you because it may reflect on them poorly.
	But there's this cloak of secrecy that is everywhere in Washington, D.C.
	Don't question what I do.
	Years ago, as an intern in DC, and long before the agencies all locked their doors, I had the occasion to putter around the Department of Transportation and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said Jeffrey Tucker.
	These were obviously not normal workplaces.
	To my amazement, they were mostly dark, empty, and quiet, and the employees did not seem in the slightest bit busy doing anything at all.
	It was kind of spooky.
	It then occurred to me that these many hundreds of agencies and millions of employees are not really covered well by the media much at all.
	And certainly not in any detail.
	They mostly operate without any oversight for the periodic reporting done for Congress and the sporadic accounting reports from the Government Accounting Office that are mostly ignored.
	So that's one side of it.
	The other side of it, you know, the secrecy that came from the military-industrial complex and newly created intelligence community after World War II, the other side of all this came from the IRS.
	The IRS, for the longest time, people write books like a law unto itself.
	The fact that they would have, they would write the rules, that they would have their own court where they would determine whether or not you had violated those rules, that type of thing.
	And where you had no presumption of innocence.
	They didn't have to prove that you owe the tax, you had to prove that you didn't owe the tax.
	So when you create, and that's a process that they have now applied.
	To all of these alphabet agencies.
	The idea that if the bureaucracy creates a rule, and you violate that rule, there's no presumption of innocence, there's no due process, there's no protection against excessive fines, the Bill of Rights doesn't apply to you whatsoever.
	Because this is some new construct that has been created outside of the government and your elected people.
	And so when Nancy Pelosi says, we've just got to pass Obamacare to find out what it's in it, we're going to kick it over to the alphabet agencies and they're going to decide what's in it.
	They will regulate it.
	It's a horrific system that's there.
	Now he doesn't talk about that aspect of it, but that's the two systems.
	It's the secrecy and it's the pretense that, you know, playing the semantics, saying a rule is not a law.
	If it were a law created by your elected representatives, then you would, we would have to follow the constitution.
	But we are not under the Constitution.
	We are a bureaucracy.
	So, he said, going back to what he said, there's one organization that looks at this stuff, open the books.
	They started with an idealistic idea of telling people what the operations of these agencies are really like.
	They focus on the mundane accounting and the goings-on at normal civilian agencies.
	In other words, they're not getting into areas where there really is anything that is secure, but they guard it as if it were secure.
	For example, In a report to Congress, the Biden administration redacted, in other words hid, 350,000 names and 280,000 work locations from the payrolls.
	Imagine that!
	280,000 work locations they have for this massive bureaucracy and this is just the civilian side of it.
	Non-classified stuff.
	And when you look at that, you know, I mean that's only You got 350,000 names.
	You got 280,000 work locations.
	I mean, do they have like each of these people have their own private work location or something?
	Uh, these employees are not spies or intelligence officers.
	They are rank and file workers within the alphabet soup of traditional federal agencies like education, health and health services, where the EPA or the IRS, as a result, the organization couldn't tell who was working, where they were located and what they were doing.
	It's a secret.
	I would have to kill you if you found out.
	That's why I said it's this cloak of secrecy that they brought in for the spy agencies that's now metastasized everywhere.
	It's a lack of due process and the tyranny and dictatorship that was brought in to collect taxes and that's now metastasized to all these different agencies.
	The average pay in 109 of 125 federal agencies was more than $100,000 per employee.
	And after just three years, federal employees received 44 days off.
	more than $100,000 per employee.
	And after just three years, federal employees received 44 days off, 8.8 full work weeks off of paid time.
	That was, um, and a friend who has worked for the EPA and research triangle park.
	We went to church together.
	He was a conservative libertarian guy.
	He and his wife had started their own business.
	He did not want to leave his... He hated the government, but he wasn't about to leave that cushy position at the EPA.
	Because of this kind of stuff!
	I mean, the pay, the vacations, all the rest of the stuff.
	And even as the EPA, the reason all this stuff came up was because the business that he and his wife were running was periodically like a couple of times a year.
	They would have this big sale where everybody, they would administer it and everybody would sell their used clothes and used toys and all kinds of stuff like that.
	So it was a big fair where people could buy and sell stuff at a cheap rate.
	And the EPA was looking at the time about even banning the sale of anything that might possibly have any lead in it.
	So if you got some jeans, they might have lead in the zipper.
	So you can't sell that again.
	And he was like, can you believe this?
	It's like you work for these people.
	Employees took nearly a year in some instances to update their duty station, which meant that the department couldn't verify whether or not they were showing up to work because they didn't know where they were supposed to be.
	So, I mean, this is what you find with the government.
	I wonder, everybody talks about a Byzantine bureaucracy and just how it got out of control.
	And the Byzantine Empire.
	I wonder.
	I bet it pales in comparison to what we have.
	And that is our hope.
	This big, wasteful, stupid thing is just this rotten tree stump waiting for the right wind to blow it over.
	Anyway, thanks to nearly a century and a half of gradual accumulation, these agencies have a permanent life.
	The employees cannot be fired except for egregious actions, and the elected president has no control over them.
	Let me repeat that.
	And the elected president has no control over them.
	Drain the swamp?
	Well, the swamp is theoretically under the president, but the president has no control over them.
	He can only appoint agency heads, but then the battle becomes hundreds of people versus millions of people.
	And hundreds of appointees are new at their job.
	And they're easily driven out by hints of financial impropriety that are real or made up.
	Just take a look at what happened to Scott Pruitt.
	He started doing some things at the APA.
	They got rid of him.
	Made up stuff.
	The permanent class of middle state bureaucrats with all the institutional knowledge know precisely where the power resides.
	It is with them.
	There's an excellent British series that we used to watch as a family.
	A lot of fun.
	Yes, Minister.
	Remember that, Travis?
	That was really good.
	This guy gets elected, and the guy who is the bureaucrat just completely controls him.
	It's very much like Jeeves and Wooster.
	You know, where you have this rich kid and the wise butler who's doing everything for him.
	This system of administrative hegemony has not been seriously tested in court, and it's contrary to everything the Constitution ever imagined.
	Says Jeffrey Tucker.
	It is, folks, taxation without representation.
	And worse than that, or as bad as that, it is regulation without any representation.
	The real solution is a complete rethinking of government itself, says Jeffrey Tucker.
	Every single candidate should be asked to explain their answer to a basic question.
	And I absolutely agree with him.
	And you'll never hear this asked by ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, MSNBC, CNN, any of these people.
	Here's a question they should all be asked.
	What, in your view, is the role of government?
	Wouldn't you think that'd be a reasonable question to ask them each and every time?
	No, no.
	They would ask them, what do you think of Roe v. Wade?
	But they won't say, what do you think the role of government should be?
	He says, whatever the answer is, all the existing practices of government need to be assessed in light of that.
	And voters should evaluate their answers with an even more fundamental question.
	When we look at that, we want to say, what kind of society do we want to live in?
	Do we want to live in a free society?
	Or one that is centrally managed and controlled?
	And you see, the reality is, is that both Trump and Lala, uh, and you know, RFK Jr.
	Oh yeah, I want to, I want to control, I'll get rid of some of these and put my people in all this.
	They all want to micromanage your life.
	And, um, and that's what the voters demand.
	See, the voters have really thought this through, I think, for most part.
	And I think if you really push them.
	They would say, well, we value safety and comfort and convenience, and we don't value liberty.
	And we want the government to provide safety and comfort.
	Now, the paths to safety and comfort and all the rest of it, we can't agree on how to get there, you see.
	But Trump and Harris and all, they all have the same idea that the government, the federal government especially, should fix everything for us.
	That these politicians, are the saviors that are going to do everything for us and keep us safe.
	So here's an example.
	Mises.org.
	The problem with Trump's Agenda 47 for homeschoolers.
	So his program that he's putting out there is Agenda 47.
	Homeschooling, says Mises, has never been an experiment.
	Parents teaching their children the individual and unique things which they believe they should know has not only been the way of life before public school experiment, government school, but it is the most libertarian way to address the total government failure and the inefficient model of so-called education.
	It's also the Christian way to raise your kids, to take ultimate responsibility.
	You know, God did not say it takes a village to raise a child.
	That was Hillary Clinton.
	She thinks she's God.
	So beware of the fifth column candidates who tell you that they're on your side.
	They said, though Trump's Agenda 47 makes him seem like a champion of homeschoolers, it's another bait-and-switch.
	Laying the groundwork for total government oversight has the potential for demanding arcane metrics from the same establishment from which the homeschoolers are escaping.
	One of the upsides to homeschooling, among many, is that it allows parents to take charge of their children's education.
	Free from government intervention.
	Free from bureaucratic red tape.
	And Trump knows that money controls people.
	And this is why I haven't cut him any slack on anything that he did in 2020 to us as part of the so-called pandemic.
	Because he knows that the money is the controlling strings for everything.
	And he cut the money.
	He cut the checks.
	You know, he even said it recently.
	Well, you know, I don't like what's going on in the schools with the transgender stuff.
	When I become president, we're going to cut the funding for that.
	And of course, I use that example all the time to try to explain to the MAGA people.
	When Obama said, well, if you don't put boys in the girls' showers, I'm going to cut your funding.
	Trump says, if you do put boys in the girls' showers, I'm going to cut your funding.
	But here's the bottom line.
	They both know.
	That the funding is the way the federal government controls things, without having anybody challenge you over the Tenth Amendment.
	It's the way that you control things over which you have no legitimate authority.
	You bribe people, or you blackmail them, saying, I'm going to remove the money that you've become addicted to.
	And we don't want that to happen with homeschooling.
	Don't ever take their money.
	Trump pledged to allow homeschool parents to use 529 education savings accounts to contribute up to $10,000 a year per child, completely tax-free, in order to spend on costs associated with homeschool education.
	What are the stipulations behind taking this money from the government?
	Ask Mises.
	Uh, well, there'll be none at first, right?
	That's the way this stuff rolls out.
	There won't be any at first.
	What did they do with the title nine funding that they want to play back and forth with over the boys and the girls showers?
	There was no strings attached to that at first.
	They put it out there.
	They get you addicted to it.
	And then the strings come.
	So he says, well, of course he doesn't say, am I wrong to be wary?
	Of course not.
	It wasn't that long ago that we had the simple 15 days to slow the spread.
	Where'd that come from?
	That came from the Trump administration, right?
	And then that turned into the largest government overreach in a set of tyrannical orders that the U.S.
	has ever seen.
	No matter how tasty the dangling carrot, it always comes at a price.
	And he doesn't even mention the fact that, of course, the 15 days to slow the spread and flatten the cove, all the rest of this stuff.
	And then it was the money from Trump.
	That was the carrot for everybody.
	That was the carrot for the governors.
	Do it.
	As soon as the bait has been taken, the switch begins.
	What will that switch entail?
	That's anybody's guess.
	But the looming consideration that the requirements of standardized testing, curriculum mandates, and other forms of government oversight are around the corner isn't too far-fetched.
	That's right.
	They're trying to, many jurisdictions, trying to force Christian schools, private schools, to teach LGBT curriculum and things like that.
	You know, my proposal and the LP of North Carolina went with it for this kind of stuff was to say, let's set up private scholarships.
	They want to say that money is running through the government, and so the government has rifle control of it.
	Of course, the teachers unions wanted to stop it at the very beginning.
	They said, well, you can't do that.
	You can't, the government can't give anybody, any private schools or charter schools or home schools, can't give them any money because now you're supporting, you know, if they're teaching religion, we can't have anybody teaching religion anymore.
	Just, you know, they got to teach their religion.
	Anyway, I said, well, the way we get around this, perhaps, is maybe we could offer private scholarships.
	And so what we would do is say, you can get X amount of dollars and credit on your taxes.
	If you give that money to some kid who is going to use it for their education, give them a scholarship, right?
	Why should it be limited to billionaires?
	Why can't your next-door neighbor, who likes your kids, donate money to you to help you school your kids and get a tax deduction for it?
	And I said, we'd have to be careful.
	Even that, they could come back with some backdoor regulation, maybe.
	But if the government never gets the money to start with, how do they say that you're giving out money for religious purposes or whatever, and we're going to attach our strings to it?
	It's not coming from them at all.
	You're simply saying, well, I'm going to give money to kids.
	It could be for education.
	It could be for anything, right?
	Just make it broad so that we don't even bring in education into it.
	And then you'd be able to get a tax deduction, or better yet, a tax credit.
	And, um, you know, determine that people can, you know, a couple of thousand dollars a year, maybe max it out.
	And then you have, um, an industrious young kid or mom who would go around like we used to do when I was in band, we'd go door to door in our band uniform, selling candy to get extra money so that we could take trips or buy more, you know, instruments or whatever.
	Uh, uh, the unusual instruments that, uh, kids are not going to go out and buy for themselves, but you still need them in the band.
	Anyway, we would, uh, go door to door and we'd sell candy.
	And, uh, so I think the industrious kids would go door to door selling themselves as, Hey, you know, I'd like to see if you're interested in sponsoring my education.
	Yeah.
	Maybe you get a hundred dollars from that person or something and just keep going around and doing it.
	But you might be able to get enough that you could, um, have a lot of money for your education, for virtual, a lot of different things.
	And it would be up to the industrious kids to go around and do it.
	Maybe let's set up some kind of a lemonade stand.
	Help me get educated.
	Make a donation here, that type of thing.
	So that was our plan, but we couldn't get any attention for it because we couldn't get any attention.
	There was no social media even in those days and it was really difficult to get The newspapers to cover anything, because first thing they'd ask is, how much money have you got?
	In other words, how much, how many ads are you going to be running on our newspaper?
	And they quickly lost interest in this with that.
	Homeschooling offers self-reliance, allowing parents and children to tailor their education individually rather than being limited to a one-size-fits-all.
	I would say one-size-fits-none.
	One-size-fits-none.
	Trump is largely a media machine, says Mises.org.
	He's saying the right words, he's dangling the right carrot, and he's playing a character who checks all the right boxes for a certain base of his.
	However, Bumpstock Trump is what they call him.
	Donald Bump.
	Or we could say Benedict Donald, I don't know, or the red flags of the red state.
	Bumpstock Trump is either fully aware of the way he sets the stage for the intrusion of big government, or he is completely inept regarding the spaces that he leaves open, exploiting the vulnerable in the process.
	I think he's Benedict Donald.
	While for many, offering government funds would allow for families who struggle, as it is, to continue to teach their children.
	Again, if you want to do it, even without help from the government.
	If this is something you want to do, you'll find a way.
	We just need to make people aware of the fact that we need to get Admiral Akbar as our spokesperson.
	It's a trap!
	The money is a trap, it always is.
	If your intention of educating your kids is to honor God, God will honor you.
	To teach your kids, right?
	God tells us to teach our children many things.
	Most important things are character.
	So you should beg God for the ability to teach your kids.
	Not Trump.
	And certainly not anybody else in the Democrat Party is not going to give you anything that's a non-starter with them to start with.
	But don't beg government for this.
	Beg God.
	Tell him to give you the ability to do what he commands.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Oh, I'm missing you.
	Oh, I'm missing you.
	You're the doctor of my dreams.
	With your crinkly purse and your classy stuff And your pack of eggs and your schemes Alright, so people say that you don't care But you've got nicer legs than Hitler And bigger than Cher And I'm listening just for when we're safe, yo I'm wishing you were here
	Yeah, let's talk about Build-A-Burger.
	Henry Kissinger, the patron saint of Bilderberg, the elder statesman, no longer with us.
	We're missing Henry Kissinger.
	But don't worry, we have people like Peter Thiel and Eric Schmidt to take the place of Kissinger at Bilderberg.
	As I've said before, When I went to Virginia, we were so far away from where they were, we couldn't see anything at all.
	Just, you know, massive forest between us and the hotel.
	So about all I could do was to get a bullhorn and play that song.
	We knew Kissinger was there because he's always there.
	This is from The Last American Vagabond.
	Americans are increasingly becoming aware of the fact that the secretive Bilderberg group is funding both sides of the 2024 presidential election.
	Maybe that's why Alex doesn't cover Bilderberg anymore.
	I find out that Trump is there, right?
	The Eric Schmidt and Peter Thiel and J.D.
	Vance.
	I guess you could call J.D.
	Vance, instead of being a young Davos leader, he's a young Bilderberg leader, right?
	Out of category for that?
	No, they don't do that.
	They don't want you to see what they're doing.
	They want you to see the curated Bond villain Klaus Schwab.
	They have him on display all the time and yet they don't want you to see what's going on at Bilderberg at all.
	Uh, former Google CEO, Eric Schmidt, it's going all in on the Democrat party and on Lala Harris.
	Peter Thiel is investing in Trump and both of them are on the steering committee for the Bilderberg group.
	Yeah.
	Isn't that interesting?
	You know, you got, uh, you got Kissinger over the years there at Bilderberg and it's only like a couple of degrees separation.
	Between these politicians and the big media people.
	You know, whether you're talking about Joe Biden, or Trump, or Pchenik, or Alex Jones.
	There's just a couple of degrees of separation between Kissinger and the mainstream media, as well as the mainstream alternative media.
	While knowledge of this illusion of choice is spreading, the connections between Thiel and Schmidt, as well as other members of the Bilderberg group, run deeper.
	than the surface level relationships, rather than the intersection between the hidden ruling class represented at the Bilderberg meetings and the big tech technocrats has immense influence on the U.S.
	government, U.S.
	military intelligence at the highest levels and the world in general.
	And so in this article, The Last American Vagabond talks about a recently created fund, the America's Frontier Fund.
	But this has been the case for quite some time with a lot of different funds.
	I remember when Petraeus went there, and of course Petraeus had, you know, this military career, he goes to the CIA and so forth, and then he gets out and he goes to work for KKR.
	And the guy who founded KKR was a regular at Bilderberg, and then Petraeus became a regular at Bilderberg.
	And then Alex Karp, who runs Palantir.
	Now, Palantir was created by Peter Thiel, gave them money to it, but the person who runs it, Alex Karp, is a Democrat supporter, but he runs Palantir, and he's always at the Bilderberg group as well, just like Petraeus.
	So, whether you're talking about KKR or you're talking about this newer fund, same situation, always.
	But this new fund is America's frontier fund.
	That's what Last American Vagabond is focused on.
	Describes itself as the, quote, first investment platform committed to ensuring the U.S.
	remains the best place in the world for frontier technology.
	We're not talking wagon wheels here.
	Innovation and, of course, investment returns.
	AFF was first announced in May of 2021 and has been described as a for-profit investment fund housed within a non-profit organization.
	This allows AFF to quote leverage the assets of a for-profit business while also obscuring its investors because they're in a not-for-profit business you can't see who's investing in it.
	AFF is stacked with individuals with ties to the U.S.
	military, including Michelle Flournoy, former Undersecretary of Defense under Obama, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, and H.R.
	McMaster that were under Trump.
	In May of 2022, a leaked draft of the announcement of the creation of AFF was obtained by a project called Tech Transparency.
	This draft shows that AFF originally described itself as the first public-private deep tech fund.
	Well, whenever you see public-private, just understand crony capitalism and corruption.
	That's what that means.
	And it's a deep tech fund.
	Deep State Tech?
	I don't know.
	The implication was that AFF would receive taxpayer funds from the U.S.
	government as well as private money from investors.
	In response to the leaked document, AFF said it was not approved and we do not describe ourselves that way.
	We are a non-profit deep tech fund.
	Not a public-private deep tech fund, right?
	Deep tech fund.
	I don't know deep tech is, but it doesn't sound good to me.
	It also noted that it had responded to requests for information from the Department of Commerce about a semiconductor fund.
	You've seen a lot of talk about this, right?
	Both Biden and Trump.
	Oh, we got to pour lots of money into the semiconductor fund.
	The New York Times previously reported on their effort to ramp up U.S.
	manufacturing of semiconductors by having the U.S.
	taxpayer pay for the increased production.
	Semiconductors are the basis of our tech superiority, they say.
	Because everything has to go back to silicon.
	Both Peter Thiel and Eric Schmidt have donated to the non-profit side of the organization.
	And so the board of directors says they will have no involvement in investment decisions.
	Isn't that convenient?
	Now they do that.
	Uh, it's not a far-fetched idea to imagine Eric Schmidt or Peter Thiel using their influence over AFF to direct taxpayer funds towards startup companies in which they're invested.
	I mean, that's the way Bilderberg operates, right?
	We're just having, I don't know.
	It's just like a party.
	I don't, nothing serious is going on here.
	Like I said, you know, the guy's coming down the side.
	He's fumbling for his ID and he opens up his bag and it pours out as nothing but paperwork.
	That was Ed Balls, by the way, from the UK.
	For example, the New York Times has previously reported that Schmidt invested millions of dollars into more than half a dozen defense startups.
	So he is the big guy now in the military-industrial complex.
	And then, Freethought Project talks about the In-Q-Tel connection.
	I've talked about that a great deal.
	That's the venture capital firm for the CIA.
	Perhaps the most interesting connection between Schmidt, AFF, and U.S.
	intelligence is the appointment of Gilman Louie as the fund's CEO.
	Louie is infamous for his role as the first CEO of In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital firm.
	He has previously told the New York Times that any concern about Eric Schmidt's influence on US politics is misplaced.
	He says, if anything, we need more Eric Schmidts to get involved and not to stand on the sidelines.
	We need more technologists to have influence.
	I don't need the government to give us permission to go save the country, he said.
	It'd be nice if they would help us.
	Yeah.
	Throw some money their way, right?
	Well, the purpose of In-Q-Tel, as I've said many times, was to pick the contestants, the candidates for the contest, the apprentices, if you will,
	We're going to be given a lot of seed money from In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital firm, and a lot of other venture capital firms that were formed that had, uh, all of these people from the intelligence community, whether it was the CIA or the NSA, they had put tons of people on these venture capital boards and they picked the people and gave them the money and told them to go, you know, compete against each other.
	May the best person win.
	And that's how you got Google and how you got these dominant social media companies to start with.
	The relationship is not surprising given the close ties between Google's Eric Schmidt's former company and In-Q-Tel.
	In 2004, Google acquired Keyhole Incorporated for an undisclosed sum and used their technology to create Google Earth.
	Keyhole's software was originally developed with funding from In-Q-Tel.
	So they, In-Q-Tel funds it, and then they're giving money to Facebook and to Google and everything, and Google buys Keyhole Software.
	And you know, the people who are on these boards and associated with these companies are making lots of money as well.
	You know, it used to be that the CIA would reward, financially reward its people with connections in the oil industry like they did George HW Bush or somebody like David Dewhurst, the long-term lieutenant governor in Texas who bought his way into office.
	He retired from the CIA and all of a sudden next thing you know he's an oil magnate in Texas.
	And so that used to be what they would do.
	Now it's the tech companies, right?
	The CIA people, they can make more money in tech than they can in oil.
	Schmidt is an investor and a chairman of Sandbox AQ, an AI company which has also received banking from In-Q-Tel in 2022.
	Peter Thiel's own company, Palantir, got two rounds of investment from In-Q-Tel that totaled more than $2 million.
	In-Q-Tel is not without its own conflicts of interest.
	According to a 2016 report in the Wall Street Journal, numerous individuals working for In-Q-Tel had financial connections with companies that were backed by the CIA.
	No, really?
	The CIA used to always call itself The Company.
	A 2019 ProPublica report detailed how the Department of Defense had become unusually deferential to Schmidt under former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis's leadership.
	Everybody focused on his demeanor, the idea he wanted to kill everybody in the room, that type of thing.
	Mad dog Mattis.
	When I reported on Mattis, what I thought was most interesting, and again, he was Trump's first Secretary of Defense, what I thought was most interesting was there was a big contract, really big contract, for kind of a unified database for the Pentagon.
	They called it Jedi something, something like Jedi.
	And Mattis and his female assistant Made several trips to Seattle to meet with Amazon.
	And everybody was saying that it was a contract that was set up, looked like they had written it for Amazon.
	And like I said, both of them made several trips, but Mattis's female assistant made tons of trips to Amazon and Seattle.
	And Microsoft edged its way in because Microsoft has really good connections in Washington.
	I mean, you know, Jeff Bezos is kind of a latecomer, and he's trying to get his foot in the door there in Washington.
	But every time he does, the door gets slammed in his face by Microsoft, because they've been there for a long time.
	And Microsoft actually beat them out on this Jedi contract.
	And then Amazon sued.
	And Jim Mattis was working with Amazon and all this stuff while he was Secretary of Defense for Trump.
	That's the way this stuff works.
	You know, the Amazon-Pentagon cloud, and they operate under a cloud, really.
	So, whoever is elected as the next president, Jeffrey Epstein is going to be the real winner, says Brian Shalhavi of Health Impact News.
	The legacy of Jeffrey Epstein.
	It's important to remember that national politics in the United States is a closely scripted arm of the entertainment industry.
	It has almost no bearing on real life or the issues facing Americans every day, says Bryant.
	The fact that more Americans don't recognize this yet, especially after the great coup of 2020 and the COVID scam, shows how powerful a demonic enchantment still holds the minds and emotions of most Americans today, who foolishly believe that they can somehow change the fate of our nation by simply voting their favorite candidate into office.
	Never ceases to amaze me the people who want to argue with me that I must support Trump.
	And it's like, well, first of all, I live in Tennessee.
	There's probably no state in the union that's got more solid Trump support.
	My vote isn't going to make any difference one way or the other.
	Whether it's there or whoever I vote for.
	Right or wrong, Trump is going to win Tennessee.
	That's a foregone conclusion.
	But they really get angry.
	Because you see, what I say to them is exactly what Brian said.
	You're foolishly believing that you're going to somehow change things with your single vote, or even with the money that you give to this billionaire.
	And they don't like that challenge, because that's what they place their hope in.
	Isn't that sad?
	Place your hope in that con game, in that entertainment business.
	This is what I say to people.
	Vote or don't vote.
	Vote for whoever you want.
	I don't care.
	But don't make it an existential thing on your bucket list.
	Don't tie your future mentally, emotionally, spiritually into this thing.
	Keep your arm's length away from this thing.
	Just look at it as some task that you may or may not do.
	You know, again, vote for whoever you wish, but don't become a groupie.
	Don't join the cult.
	Please don't try to push a civil war on us and be a useful idiot for that nonsense.
	So they said they do this even while they admit that they're voting for the lesser of two evils and acknowledging that the elections are rigged, but they still want to place their hope in government and to federal government of all things.
	And to one office of all things.
	The real winner will undoubtedly be Jeffrey Epstein, writes Brian, the man who built today's political system by using blackmail primarily through child sex trafficking to control the richest people in the world who really run America.
	The last hope that Epstein's clients would finally be published and that many of them would be brought to justice died last year, 2023, when the Virgin Islands v. J.P.
	Morgan lawsuit against the billionaire bankers and the Silicon Valley technocrats who were all brought to power through the Epstein financial system was settled without a single person facing judgment.
	And I mean, look at the people that are involved in this.
	You had Trump, you had Epstein, you had Alex Acosta, Trump's Labor Secretary, who before he was Labor Secretary, was the prosecutor of Jeffrey Epstein in Florida, who let him off the hook, essentially.
	And then Trump, and then the lawyers who were defending Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr.
	Look at Ken Starr.
	He was supposedly the guy who was going to come after Bill Clinton, another Epstein pal.
	Ken Starr let Bill Clinton skate.
	He let Jeffrey Epstein skate.
	He finally got thrown out by Baylor when he tried to excuse the sexual assaults of the football team.
	Yeah, Whitney Webb's got a book that she's put out, One Nation Under Blackmail.
	And there's a very interesting article from her, an excerpt from it, about Les Wexner.
	Uh, the demonic Lex Westner, who, um, uh, is, uh, the mentor was the mentor of Jeffrey Epstein.
	Yeah.
	Trump was his best friend.
	They hung out together.
	They partied together and all this kind of stuff, but it was less Wexner.
	He really kicked in the money for Jeffrey Epstein.
	Uh, this article from Whitney webs titled, uh, Leslie Wexner's inner demon.
	Taken out of the book, which I think has not been published yet, it says upcoming book, One Nation Under Blackmail.
	Jeffrey Epstein's mentor from the 1980s, a lot of disconcerting revelations.
	She begins by saying 1985 was the year that Leslie Wexner became a billionaire.
	It was also that year that the chairman of the limited began to build up his public persona, the clothing thing.
	Corsi also then later became the guy behind Victoria's Secret.
	You know, in a soft porn TV show that they would use to build that brand.
	New York Magazine profile from August of 1985 titled, The Bachelor Billionaire on Pins and Needles with Leslie Wexner.
	It was filled with photos of middle-aged Wexner grinning and embracing friends, as well as lavish praise for his business dealings.
	The New York Magazine article opens as follows.
	On the morning Leslie Wexner became a billionaire, he woke up worried.
	But this is not unusual.
	He always wakes up worried because of his dibbuck.
	If I'm pronouncing that correctly, it's a Hebrew word.
	A dibbuck, we'll just say, which pokes and prods and gives him the itchiness of his soul that he calls pins in Yiddish.
	Sometimes he runs away from it on the roads of Columbus, or he drives away from it in one of his Porsches, or he flies from it in one of his planes.
	But then it is back with his first coffee, his first meeting, nudging at him.
	Well, that's the excerpt from the New York Magazine, and there's the cover of it right there.
	I'll pull that up so people can see that.
	On Pins and Needles with Leslie Wexner, talking about his, you know, it's Yiddish for a demon.
	She said that his decision to use that word, dybbuk, Which he does, throughout the article, is quite significant, says Whitney Webb, as defined by the Encyclopædia Britannica, a dybbuk is a Jewish folklore term for, quote, a disembodied human spirit that because of former sins wanders restlessly until it finds a haven in the body of a living person, unquote.
	Unlike spirits that have yet to move on but possess positive qualities, such as the Maggid or the Ibber, the Dibbuk is almost always considered to be malicious, which leads it to be translated in English as a demon.
	So again, if he's saying, well, I'm imagining the spirit or something is edging me on, pushing me on, there were some terms that he could use that would not have been always evil.
	But he chose to use one that was always evil.
	So this was also the case in the New York Magazine profile on him.
	The author of that article, Julie Baumgold, describes Les Wexner's Dibbuck as, quote, the demon that always wakes him up in the morning, and Wexner, with Wexner, and tweets and tweaks and pulls at him.
	Wexner could have easily chosen to frame the entity as a righteous spirit, a maggot, or his righteous ancestors, an eber, that were guiding his life and his business decisions, especially for the purpose of an interview that would be read widely throughout the country.
	But instead, he chose this particular term, which says a lot for a man who has since used his billions to shape both mainstream Jewish identity and leadership in both the U.S.
	and Israel for decades.
	Per Wexner, the Dybbuk causes him to feel, quote, molten, unquote, and constantly pricked him by, quote, spiritual pins and needles, unquote.
	Apparently left him at some point as a young man, only to return in 1977 when he was 40 and half frozen during an ill-fated trip up a mountain near his vacation home in Vail, Colorado.
	This specific trip is when Wexner says he both rejoined with his childhood dybbuk and decided to, quote, change his life.
	He told the New York Magazine that his dybbuk makes him wander from house to house, wanting more and more, and, quote, swallowing companies larger than his own, unquote.
	In other words, it compels him to accumulate more money and more power with no end in sight.
	Wexner later describes the Dybbuk as, quote, an integral part of his genius, unquote.
	Wexner further describes his Dybbuk as keeping, quote, him out of balance, emotionally stunted, a part of him, the precious, treasured boy-son part, lagging behind the Dybbuk.
	This is consistent with other definitions of the term in Jewish media, including a feature piece published in the Jewish Chronicle.
	That article first defines the term as, quote, a demon that clings to a person's soul, then states that, quote, the Hebrew verb from which the word dibuch is derived is also used to describe the cleaving of a pious soul to God.
	The two states are mere images of each other, unquote.
	Per Wexner's word choice and his characterization of what he perceives as an entity dwelling within him, the entity, the dybbuk, is dominant, while his actual self and his soul, quote, lags behind and is stunted, causing him to identify more and more with the entity rather than with himself.
	For a man of such influence in the Jewish community, why has there been essentially no questions raised as to his role in directing the affairs of that community, given that he openly claimed to be guided by a dybbuk?
	This is particularly odd when one considers that Wexner has come under increased scrutiny in recent years after his protégé and closest associate for decades, Jeffrey Epstein, was outed as both a pedophile and a serial sex offender and sex trafficker.
	It is interesting, isn't it?
	You know, these people, it is demonic.
	And I think that it's, you know, the intelligence agencies, which are right there at the center, right?
	That's the other thing that's not talked about.
	Perhaps Whitney Webb talks about that.
	But when we talk about their connections to these different companies and so forth, understand that the connection is also heavy, very, very heavy, to the intelligence agencies, to the CIA, to the Mossad, and all the rest of them.
	They're ultimately, of course, the ones that were running that.
	And One Nation Under Blackmail talks about the union between the intelligence communities and organized crime.
	And there is a unity between the intelligence communities, organized crime, and, quite frankly, the demons as well.
	It's a very clear connection.
	That's who we are governed by.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk a little bit about Oprah at the DNC.
	She tied abortion.
	To the American dream.
	Have we ever seen anything like the dilation and curatage party and their convention of death?
	It's absolutely amazing.
	And of course, you know, the DNC, just like any, any opera, it's not over till the fat lady sings.
	And so they had to bring on Oprah, I guess.
	So they can close it out.
	In a performance worthy of her self-anointed status as America's spiritual guide, Oprah Winfrey took the stage at the DNC to deliver what can only be described as a sermon on the sanctity of abortion.
	With a gravitas of a high priestess delivering her divine revelation, she said, Because if you do not have autonomy over this, pointing to herself, over this, If you cannot control when and how you choose to bring your children into this world and how they adjust to herself, there is no American dream.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	There's no American dream.
	If you can't control your body and your family, um, do they want us to control our body and our family?
	I thought they were dead set against that for decades.
	They fought parents.
	Put a mask on your kid, jab your kid.
	We're not gonna let you even choose how to educate your kid.
	Yeah, okay, you chose not to kill him, so now I'm not gonna let you educate him.
	We'll educate them.
	We'll give them the gender gaslighting.
	We'll give them the pedophile grooming.
	One might wonder if before her sermon, Oprah took a moment to meditate in the DNC's gender-neutral prayer room, perhaps channeling her inner Moloch, that ancient symbol of child sacrifice.
	Or maybe she considers herself a deity in need of worship with all those sacred gender-neutral whales.
	This is from a site called Dissenter.
	Yesterday on this site, they said, we informed you that the DNC had set up gender-neutral prayer rooms.
	Scattered throughout the Convention Center, space is ostensibly created to reflect their inner commitment to inclusivity.
	Of course, the rooms are equipped with Islamic prayer rugs, but conspicuously absent is anything remotely resembling Christianity.
	But you know, when it comes to money and success, Which I think is really what she's dreaming of.
	You know, to get money and to get success, you've got to kill the kids first, right?
	That was the whole thing with Moloch.
	You know, child sacrifice for prosperity.
	And so, if you want prosperity, it's there, but you're going to have to fight racism and sexism.
	People just can't get ahead, says the black female billionaire.
	It's the horror of sexism and racism here in America.
	I've seen racism and sexism and income inequality and division.
	I've not only seen it, at times I've been on the receiving end of it.
	Yeah, yeah, good for her.
	Yeah, the poor oppressed billionaire.
	Oprah, the queen of New Age mysticism, has long peddled the idea that the universe revolves around the individual's whims and desires.
	She now extends this philosophy to argue that the American dream hinges not on hard work, freedom, or opportunity, but on the right to kill inconvenient unborn children.
	It puts a quote there which really describes, I think, it ought to be the subtitle.
	For the DNC, all who hate me love death.
	Signed, God.
	That's really what it is.
	From Proverbs, right?
	Whoever finds me finds life and obtains favor from Jehovah, but he who fails to find me injures himself.
	All who hate me love death.
	Boy, that is the epithet for the DNC, isn't it?
	They love death.
	It's a cult of death.
	They do love it.
	You could hear them screaming and cheering after she said that.
	They absolutely love it.
	They worship it.
	Yeah, they do.
	Have an abortion ban there.
	Have an abortion.
	And, man, you can sterilize yourself, too.
	The DNC has become a vehicle for nihilism, says Dissenter.
	Their platform is a twisted celebration of autonomy that elevates the right to destroy life, other people's life, above all else.
	Yet these people are lovers of self, as we've been told.
	People who have become, in the last days, lovers of self.
	And you see that even on the right, as I pointed out about Ayn Rand.
	You know, it's just there's not that much difference between Ayn Rand and Oprah Winfrey.
	They're all just about me, me, me.
	And what can I get?
	How can I love myself?
	You know, it's a self-help through a New Age religion.
	And it isn't just Oprah on the left.
	You know, she sold, in 2007, remember when she was selling The Secret?
	This is New Age occultism.
	She's sold over a million copies of it.
	The idea that you've got some positive vibrations that are going to cause good thoughts and things to happen is going to attract more positive vibrations.
	Maybe she's never done any physics.
	You know, positive and negative attract each other.
	Likes repel each other.
	But, you know, that was her idea.
	And she had this to say.
	Just as Ayn Rand said that altruism is evil.
	Altruism is evil.
	And you should, of course, you know, we're not going to compel anybody to do charity, but no, no, no.
	If you even think that that's a good thing, you should be serving yourself.
	And somebody like Jesus is evil, according to Ayn Rand.
	And so this is what Oprah says.
	God is a feeling experience and not a believing experience.
	If your religion is a believing experience, Then that's not truly God.
	Should we believe her?
	This is like these people who say, there is no absolute truth!
	Ah, so that's your absolute truth.
	She says, if your experience of God is a believing experience, well, then that's not truly God.
	So I guess we should believe her or not?
	Is she God?
	Crazy.
	But you know, like I said, it's not just her.
	We've got mainstream alternative media figures.
	Here's one of them describing his $150 course.
	Sounds very much like Oprah is a secret.
	But the interesting thing is, is that even though hers is so focused on the individual, this guy, who is very famous in mainstream alternative media, is really kind of focused on the collective.
	And he's selling this kind of New Age mysticism as a means to fight back against the globalists.
	Listen to what he has to say.
	I'm going to give you the hidden knowledge I've spent 28 years uncovering.
	All the secret teachings, all the hidden knowledge, all the information the elite ruling class has never intended for you to have.
	I mean, can't you imagine Oprah saying that?
	The conscious force which holds the atom together is what myself and many others believe to be God, lowercase g.
	All the religions in one way or the other said we're all connected.
	All of us are connected through this source of energy.
	Our true power comes from coming together and raising our energy.
	You are a spiritual being connected to this conscious force of energy.
	The purpose of God intended for us here on earth was for us to create heaven on earth.
	Yeah.
	To create heaven on earth.
	That's our purpose in life.
	Since we're all connected through consciousness, the only way to do that is to collectively raise the group consciousness.
	Their goal, the people we're fighting, is to make sure that we never realize that we're all connected together through our collective consciousness, so we can overcome the globalists.
	Where'd that come from?
	It came from Reset Wars, and for $150 you can get the secrets from Alex Jones that I just read to you.
	That's his piece there.
	Yeah, our purpose in life It is not to overcome the globalists, even.
	It is not to have heaven on earth.
	Our purpose is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever.
	Is the Biden administration's Department of Justice targeting pro-life activists?
	Well, experts say yes.
	The experts who are defending the people who have been targeted.
	You know, when Obama used the Espionage Act, to come after whistleblowers from the NSA and other people.
	Many people point out that that was done in 1917 and Obama, eight years, completed 100 years of the 1917 Espionage Act.
	And Obama came after more people using the Espionage Act than all the other presidents in the century that it, you know, combined.
	So from 1917 to 2017, Obama came after more people with the Espionage Act than all the other presidents combined.
	And now we have Biden and how he is using the FACE Act.
	Alliance Defending Freedom says, after the fall of Roe, there's no question the FACE Act prosecutions and investigations have ramped up exponentially.
	In 2022 alone, there were over 20 prosecutions of pro-life individuals.
	We see very few prosecutions of those sorts of individuals who are targeting pro-life facilities.
	In other words, the arson and the graffiti of the crisis pregnancy centers by the pro-murder abortion left.
	Those are ignored by the FBI.
	Those are ignored by the Biden administration.
	Rather, the vast majority of them is Biden-targeting pro-life individuals who are protesting or praying at abortion centers, who are not engaged in graffiti, who are not engaged in arson.
	They're engaged in free speech and protests.
	Van Netta said the Department of Justice's data on the FACE Act's violations between 1994 and 2024 is jarring.
	and 2024 is jarring. There are approximately 211 cases and around 97% of those cases are targeted at pro-life activists.
	Biden's Department of Justice is responsible for over one quarter of those.
	So in just four years, he did 25% of all of the 30 years of prosecutions.
	To think about just one individual, Lauren Handy, I believe her sentence was 57 months.
	Said the individual with the legal group.
	That's four years plus three years of supervised release.
	That's an awful long time for a nonviolent sort of protest.
	It's actually closer to five years.
	Kennan represents Handy and argues that she didn't even violate the FACE Act.
	He says, she went into the clinic with her nine cohorts.
	Two, maybe three of them blocked doors, very peacefully, but they blocked doors.
	The other seven or eight simply sat in chairs, singing, praying, handing out some pamphlets and things.
	There is no decent argument to be made that this was a face violation.
	But again, they twist this to criminalize speech and protest.
	And these have become the hallmarks of new Western civilization.
	I think we need to coin a term here.
	You know, we talk about neoconservatives.
	Call them neocons.
	Well, I think we've got people who have decided that they don't like Western civilization and they want a neo-civilization.
	They want a new civilization.
	Maybe we should start calling them neo-civs.
	Shivs, maybe.
	Shills.
	Neo-Shills.
	Trump announces that he will criminalize gender transitions without parental consent if elected.
	Well, before you agree with him on this, notice what he says.
	That without parental consent.
	And there's a couple of problems with this.
	He's, first of all, saying that only parents should be able to have sex with kids.
	Is that okay?
	I mean, this is not sex with kids, but I mean, would it be okay if we did something and we said, okay, well, you know, it is rape.
	A child cannot consent, a minor cannot consent to sex, so it is at least statutory rape to have sex with a minor.
	But we'll make an exception for parents.
	Would you agree with that?
	Would you agree that it is brutal to allow minors to be sexually mutilated?
	But we'll let parents do that?
	Is that right?
	Why should only parents be allowed to mutilate minors?
	Should they be allowed to mutilate minors at all?
	the problem is we got a lot of these parents who are have the Munchausen syndrome where they are doing this to attract attention to themselves. Just take a look at what Tim Walz did, right? And think about the fact that what Trump is announcing would not really criminalize what Walz was doing with this Look at these children here.
	We've been welcoming our neighbors back into their communities by making sure we're restoring voting rights to folks.
	We're making sure that our neighbors can drive to their kids' soccer games.
	So today, I am directing my state agencies to take action to protect and support the rights of Minnesota's LGBTQIA plus community.
	Their child is six years old and she was as excited to be It's a boy not a she.
	on spring break as any six-year-old kid could be.
	Squirming and fidgeting her way through speech is hardly aware her existence as why her parents drove five hours today to speak publicly It's it's a hundred percent personal. I mean the the safety the the happiness They want you to believe that this child thinks they're a different gender this child that can't communicate really.
	Asher why are we here today?
	For trans rights.
	For her rights to be her.
	As you can see from this interview, I can't force my kids to do anything here.
	Asher has trusted us enough. She believes in our love enough that she has invited us in to see her whole self.
	And if we don't love her that much the opposite would happen where we wouldn't get to know everything about her.
	See, Trump's proposal would let unfit parents like that.
	Mutilate their children.
	That reporter that's there doesn't have any problem with the fact that Asher... I don't know what's going on.
	These parents are dressing this six-year-old up as a girl.
	And who knows what they're going to do to his body.
	And Trump doesn't address that.
	Criminalize gender transitions without parental consent.
	That's the first problem.
	His goal is insufficient.
	It's deficient, insufficient.
	But the other part of it is, is to try to make a federal case out of everything.
	This is not anything that ought to be done by the federal government.
	Federal government always gets everything wrong.
	This needs to be done at different state levels.
	And of course, Tim Walz is going in the other direction at the state level.
	So on Tuesday, the Trump campaign released prepared remarks that Trump was set to deliver.
	And yet, he did not refer to that.
	So he said, here's his prepared speech, and he's going to talk about making it a felony for any medical professional to perform surgery on a minor without parental consent.
	The New York Post later reported that the speech came and went without Trump mentioning that.
	So these people wrote this up, gave it to him, and he didn't want to read it.
	And why would he disagree?
	He's always, folks, been pro-trans.
	As a matter of fact, Melania was paid $250,000 to appear at the Log Cabin fundraiser.
	The LGBTs had multiple fundraisers at Mar-a-Lago.
	In 2020, they bragged that he was the first president to come in supporting homosexual marriage.
	And on and on.
	There's virtue signal for all the stuff sold, rainbow merchandise in 2020, all the rest of this stuff.
	He pushed men in his beauty contest.
	I think it'd be great.
	Yeah, we should have some men competing with the women in the beauty contest.
	So as LifeSite News says, many people would prefer to see the extra step of banning such procedures entirely, regardless of whether the parents approve.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Why would you allow parents, like I just showed you, to do that kind of stuff to their kids?
	They just want attention.
	Studies find that more than 80% of children suffering gender dysphoria outgrow it on their own by late adolescence, and that transition procedures, so-called, including full reassignment surgery, fail to resolve gender-confused individuals' heightened tendency to engage in self-harm and suicide, and even exacerbate it.
	Very much so.
	They outgrow it on their own by late adolescence.
	Maybe.
	Maybe when they leave government school they outgrow it.
	Because maybe it's like the pandemic.
	You know, the Amish didn't suffer from the pandemic because they didn't watch TV.
	Maybe it's some of these people don't suffer from it because they don't abandon their kid to the state to be gaslit.
	Now here's one person that was driven to suicide.
	She was targeted and identified and groomed by the schools when she was 13 years old.
	And then when she turned 21, she engaged in what they call phalloplasty, a female trying to surgically add a male member.
	And it created so much problems for her.
	Her body was falling apart from it.
	She refused to blame Boston Children's Hospital, which is where they did it.
	And of course, Boston Children's Hospital is affiliated with Harvard University.
	That's the same hospital that medically kidnapped Justina Peltier.
	And then was able to get Marty Gottesfeld in this massive sentence.
	Even had him in a communications management unit because he spoke out against Boston Children's Hospital's medical kidnapping.
	She said, It took me a long time to come to terms with everything that happened to me in recovery.
	Acknowledging my medical trauma, I was, and still am, hesitant to completely blacklist a surgeon.
	That got me and others closer to comfort with our body, but nobody should ever have to go through things like this again.
	This is my experience and can only speak for myself, but I know there are several others of us who have been hurt and traumatized by this team.
	I was told that urological complications happen in 40 to 50 percent of patients.
	I'm not aware of any patient of theirs that did not experience urological issues.
	or that didn't take multiple surgeries to fix.
	She said she had limb swelling and chest pain ignored and misdiagnosed as being normal or constipation for weeks until I had DVT in both legs, blood clots in my pelvis, and bilateral pulmonary embolism.
	I still have joint pain and swelling issues and my legs from DVT damage.
	Urology staff ignored my breathing concerns and listed my lung functions as normal in my ER report the night before my ICU admission for clots despite struggling to breathe and my chest audibly gurgling.
	They discharged me without any medications after saying I wasted my time driving down there.
	There was a chance that the clots could have killed me soon after if I hadn't gotten a second opinion.
	And so she went on social media and was talking about her experiences with it.
	Talking about her experiences with her catheter.
	She even called it Kathy the catheter.
	Embarrasses me a lot carrying her around, but I'm still working on it.
	Three days post-op from my fifth phalloplasty related surgery.
	This time being urethral repair and on and on.
	So this original operation was done in 2021 when she was the age of 21.
	She died by suicide after three years of this compassionate medical treatment at the age of 24.
	Literally driving people to suicide.
	It is absolutely insane what is being done.
	And again, the best that we can do is to say that we'll only allow this to happen to minors.
	To minors?
	She was 21 years old and she'd been living like this for eight years.
	We're only going to allow that to happen to minors if the parents consent.
	That's not sufficient, and it's wrong to try to solve everything at the federal level.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	Making Sense.
	Common Again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's take a look at fluoride.
	We now have the federal government admitting what we've all known for decades about fluoride.
	And they admit that it lowers IQ in kids.
	And we've had multiple studies, some of them done by Harvard University, significantly lowering IQ, 20 points in many of these cases.
	And so after decades of lying about it, after decades of disinformation and name-calling of conspiracy theorists, we even had, if you remember, Dr. Strangelove, the general who kicked the whole thing off, General Jack D. Ripper, remember that?
	They're trying to corrupt our bodily fluids and put fluoride in the water and all the rest of the stuff.
	It was a hallmark of their stereotype of conspiracy theorists.
	Well, it turns out there was a conspiracy.
	A conspiracy to cover up harm that they were doing to people.
	A landmark National Toxicology Program report says that fluoride is comparable to lead in its ability to lower IQ in children.
	What is the reaction from the media?
	We've got AP, Associated Propaganda, says that, well, it's only bad at levels that are twice the recommended limit, says the Associated Propaganda.
	But Information Liberation points out that the limit was very recently cut in half.
	I guess in anticipation of this.
	Isn't it interesting the way that they spend this?
	Hey guys, there's nothing we can do about this.
	It's going to come out.
	Okay, let's cut the recommended level in half.
	And so, you know, they were recommending it at a level that would damage children's IQ.
	So you solve that by cutting the level before the report comes out.
	That's it.
	That's how you control it.
	But of course, The whole thing from the very beginning.
	They were dumping this particular type of fluoride, which is a rat poison in China.
	They were dumping it into the water supply because it was a byproduct of both the nuclear industry and the aluminum industry.
	And it would have cost them a great deal of money to dispose of this.
	Or they could tell everybody that it was good for them and have the taxpayers pay them to dump their waste into our drinking water.
	And that's exactly what they've done.
	That's how outrageous this all is.
	And so now after this has been put out there, after eight decades of this, after everybody from Kubrick to, you know, everyone else mocking it and rolling their eyes, they now admit that it's harmful.
	And yet, the CDC still stands by it.
	They still stand by this recommendation.
	Isn't that amazing?
	I guess it's not, because their response, no matter how many times you show something that they support, is harmful.
	Their response to all that is always, so what?
	So what?
	Keep doing it.
	Federal agencies have revived the COVID vaccine push, for example.
	And here's Associated Press, again, selling it for them.
	Associated propaganda.
	Associated with the government.
	That's what the AP is.
	U.S.
	regulators approved updated COVID vaccines on Thursday.
	They're updated.
	Well, you want to make sure that you've got the latest vaccine, don't you?
	Um, designed to more closely target recent virus strains and whatever variants cause trouble this winter too.
	Well, this winter hasn't happened.
	So how do you know that?
	I get these people travel in time or are they clairvoyant or something?
	This is the same game folks.
	I played with the flu shots for the longest time.
	Well, you got to get your flu shot because we're going to have new variants this year.
	How do you know that?
	And how do you know which ones are going to be?
	How do you know any of this stuff?
	Isn't it?
	Don't we know that they're lying to us?
	Well, the good news is that 82 unvaccinated health care workers have now won an arbitration case against the hospitals that fired them for not getting the mandated jabs.
	This is coming out of Toronto.
	But if you only want to know just how bad the hospitals have become, here's an example.
	And this is coming out of People magazine.
	This is like an entertainment story.
	The body of a California woman is found in coal storage a year after the hospital said she checked out.
	Is that the new euphemism for dying?
	They had her under care and they told the family she checked out and she had actually died and they put her body in coal storage.
	The family is suing a California hospital for negligence, claiming they failed to inform them of their loved one's death for close to a year.
	The woman was 31 years old.
	She had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes since the age of 10 and was admitted to the hospital where she had previously gone to seek diabetic treatment.
	They put her in the hospital April of 2023 due to a diabetic episode.
	Two days later, the 31-year-old woman called her mother and asked to be picked up from the hospital per the complaint.
	Around two hours later, she died of cardiac arrest while suffering from diabetic ketoacidosis, a lack of insulin to process blood sugar into energy, according to a death certificate that was obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle.
	So, her mother, the mother of this 31-year-old, alleged in the complaint that when she called the hospital again on April 11th, she had been told that her daughter had left the center against medical advice and that there is no one here by that name.
	Now, isn't that interesting?
	Against, that they would say against medical device.
	Was there some kind of, was she unhappy with what was being done to her?
	She tried to get out of there?
	Maybe she died?
	She was trying to get out because they didn't treat her properly in the first point, but that's not what they're alleging, and that's not what they're suing the hospital for.
	The mother said, I spelled her name for them, and the man on the phone said, well, we don't have anybody here by that name.
	She said she and her two daughters, other daughters, filed a missing persons report with the police, searched for her until she got a call from a Sacramento County Sheriff's Detective in April of 2024.
	A year later, April the 12th, it was April the 11th, 2023, she disappeared.
	So, a year and a day later, they confirmed her daughter's death.
	The family later found out that her remains were transferred from one medical center to another medical center's off-site cold storage facilities after she died.
	So, is it bad care?
	Is it negligent care?
	Is it just bad record-keeping?
	Her death certificate was issued 361 days after she died.
	Well, if we look at what is happening with the UK, the tyranny that immediately has been rolled out by this new Labour government is just unbelievable.
	The story at Freethought Project, several people have covered this story from a journalist, Richard Medhurst.
	He is a Syrian-British independent journalist who defends Palestinians' rights to resist Israeli apartheid occupation.
	He talks about his family on his father's side, goes back many generations, law enforcement involvement and the other things, in terms of being with the police department, that type of thing.
	But he is a journalist and I think his mother is Syrian, so as I say, Syrian-British journalist.
	He said this week that he was recently arrested at London's Heathrow Airport and held for nearly 24 hours for allegedly running afoul of a highly controversial anti-terrorism law.
	Critics say he's being used to silence legitimate dissent.
	He's known for his work opposing US-British and Israeli war crimes in the Middle East, and for his advocacy for formerly-imprisoned WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
	He said on social media, I criticized the Terrorism Act before getting on the plane, and then I got arrested under the Terrorism Act when I landed, when the plane landed.
	He says, you can't make this up.
	But the government can.
	The video is nearly nine minutes long, but I cut this down and I wanted you to hear the description of how he was treated.
	It truly is astounding.
	And folks, if we don't stop this attack on free speech, they, well, disinformation, misinformation, hate speech, all the rest of these things, this is where it ultimately leads for everyone.
	As we look at these neo-civs who want to rewrite our civilization.
	My name is Richard Thomas Medhurst.
	I'm an internationally accredited journalist from the United Kingdom.
	On Thursday, as I landed in London Heathrow Airport, I was immediately escorted off the plane by six police officers who were waiting for me at the entrance of the aircraft.
	They arrested me, not detained, they arrested me under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act of 2000 and accused me of allegedly, quote, expressing an opinion or belief that is supportive of a prescribed organization, unquote, but wouldn't explain what this meant.
	One officer took my bags and when I asked why he was still back in the aircraft, I was told, look mate, you can get nixed right here in front of everyone or in there, your choice.
	So I was taken to an adjacent room, patted down, my phone confiscated, I was not allowed to inform my family.
	Despite being calm and cooperative, I was handcuffed with something that placed my shoulders in an awkward position and my wrists on top of, rather than next to each other.
	The handcuffs were extremely tight.
	Despite the police loosening them, they left marks on me for two days.
	The police took me down onto the runway.
	Put me in a police van, essentially a mobile cage, and informed me that everything was being recorded.
	The van was cramped.
	I had to struggle the entire time to keep my balance and try not to fall over as we drove to the police station.
	Now, once inside the station, they searched me again for the second time within 10 minutes.
	I was told to sit on a bench.
	Remove my shoes.
	Remove my socks.
	I was told to turn my socks inside out and hold them up for the officers to inspect.
	They also made me hold up my feet so they could check them as well.
	The officers took me to a room with UV lights, which they told me is used to catch burglars who are sprayed with something.
	I have no idea why they did this, since they just removed me off of a plane.
	My suitcase was then opened in the lobby and ransacked.
	All of my journalistic equipment and devices were seized, including phones, SIM cards, wireless microphones, microphones, headphones, even my shoelaces!
	They later took my DNA as well, my fingerprints, palm prints, and photographed me.
	I was placed in solitary confinement in a cold cell that smelt like urine.
	There was barely any light, and the bed, if you can even call it a bed, was simply a small concrete ledge with a paper-thin mattress.
	The cell had no windows, no heating, no toilet paper.
	I was recorded 24-7 with audio and video, even when going to the toilet.
	I had to eat food with a piece of cardboard that you're supposed to fold into in order to scoop up the meal.
	The police said that I have the right to inform someone that I'm locked up.
	So I said, okay, I want to call my family.
	And then they'd go, well, your calls are withheld because of the nature of the alleged offense.
	I tried to ask, well, what's the point of a right if you can just randomly withdraw it?
	Why tell me that I have this right at all?
	And one of them said something along the lines of, well, it's not an absolute right.
	It can be waived.
	Similarly, they said I had the right to know why I was being detained, so I asked again, and the police would say something like, well, we're just the arresting officers, we don't really know, or this will be explained to you during the interview, or some other generic response.
	Now, despite the police officer's civility and cheerfulness, I felt that the whole process was designed to humiliate, intimidate, and dehumanize me, and treat me like a criminal, even though they must have been aware of my background and that I'm a journalist.
	I was under surveillance almost the entire time from the moment I was arrested until I was released, be it in the police van, in the station, the cell, all of it.
	No privacy whatsoever.
	Many of my requests were also delayed or outright ignored.
	When I was detained, I asked for water several times.
	The police would always say sure, but then I ended up waiting hours for a tiny cup of water.
	I asked if I could have my own clothes because I was in a t-shirt.
	It was cold and I couldn't sleep.
	They said they'd give me a pullover, but never did.
	Although one guard did give me a second blanket.
	So you have to nag and nag for the most basic things, and this is why I was afraid that they weren't even going to call a solicitor for me.
	I was able to see the nurse on one occasion, but on three other occasions when I asked to see the nurse, they'd say yes and then nothing.
	For many hours, no one in the- And again, it goes on.
	It's unbelievable.
	What he said is when they finally got, after 24 hours of this, when they finally got somebody to come in.
	It only took an hour for them to interrogate him.
	Why'd I have to stay there for 24 hours, he says.
	That was to intimidate me.
	We've already seen this, though, with the January 6th people.
	We've seen people now given decades of jail time, life sentences for some of the elderly people who simply showed up to exercise their First Amendment protected rights, their God-given rights protected by the First Amendment.
	of free speech, of a right to assemble and peacefully redress their grievances.
	Most of the people, nearly all of the people, are there for peaceful protest.
	It is something that is coming everywhere.
	All of Western civilization, that's why I call these people neo-civs.
	They want to reset civilization.
	Tech giants and AI researchers are proposing digital ID requirements to use the internet.
	And so you see, what they want to do is, and this is coming from MIT and Oxford and Microsoft, of course, and OpenAI, Sam Altman, you know, the guy who's obsessed with going around and scanning people's eyeballs and giving them a little bit of crypto trash for their trouble.
	They say they want to stop fraud.
	That's what they're going to, how they're going to sell this stuff.
	Look, Microsoft, as I said many times before, for creators, they want CCPA.
	It's not the Chinese Communist Party of America.
	It could be, though.
	But it is the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authentication.
	They want to combine With the media giants and the hardware manufacturers, the CPU manufacturers, as well as the software manufacturers to identify each and every one of us if we create any content, whether it is text or a meme, or whether it is audio, or whether it is audio and video, they want to mark that from the creators and stop it.
	And then they want an ID for all the people who even read.
	So if they don't like what you're reading, they can come after you.
	And we've seen people say, yeah, I don't like anonymity on the internet.
	Jordan Peterson, for example, who ought to know better.
	He got very upset because he had a lot of anonymous trolls.
	Nobody likes trolls, especially anonymous trolls.
	But you need to focus on what this is really, what's really behind all this.
	So IDs for users to use the internet.
	CCPA to track the creators and to block them.
	What is the purpose of it?
	To do that kind of thing.
	And it's not just going to be silencing you, putting a gag in your mouth.
	They are actually going to arrest people.
	We see the beginnings of this in Florida, for example.
	That heinous act by DeSantis and other Republicans.
	Shameful that they would go to Israel, to a foreign country, In order to beg for money, is why they would go there to sign it, but to sign a bill that would make hate speech a crime.
	Any kind of speech that you hate, if you make it a crime, you have just destroyed the First Amendment for everyone.
	For everyone.
	And so, it's a very dangerous situation.
	Before we have Gerald Cilenti joining us, I just want to remind everybody, if you want to start trying to get out of this trap, this system that they've got us in, again, you can start to accumulate gold and silver.
	We're going to talk to Gerald Cilenti about gold.
	He said at the beginning of the year, he said, This is going to be the year of gold, and certainly it is, because it is the year of exponentially absurd fiscal activities by both Democrats and Republicans.
	If you want to start to get out of this system that is going to be designed to track and to control you, this system that is going to be based on the declining value of the dollar because they are going to eviscerate it with their spending and their debt and their other policies.
	You can start to do that gradually.
	You can do it from $50 a month up with Wolfpack or you can buy gold and silver, whatever amount you want to with a one-time purchase.
	Tony will let you do that.
	He doesn't have a minimum purchase that people can make, and so he will get the gold and silver for you, or you can start to gradually accumulate it as part of the Wolfpack and get a group buy discount with that.
	All of that is at davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Aardman.
	And I just want to say before we have Gerald joining us, That it is very important for us to also understand how do we maintain our independence in terms of our food supply, our natural food chain.
	And of course it is highly dependent on the bee.
	Patriotbeebest.com.
	It is one of the best places where you can go to find information about bees.
	It is a digital bee sanctuary for education, engagement, and real change.
	These people know bees and Patriot Bee Best is laser focused on restoration and preservation of the American bee population.
	You can learn about how the honeybee benefits all of us, discover bee-friendly initiatives and other helpful resources at the Worker Bee Subscription level of the Buzz.
	You get advocacy opportunities, educational information, bee-friendly products, bee rescue activities, and more.
	If you step up to the Queen Bee subscription level for Buzz, you get bonus content on patriotic topics related to restoring and reinforcing American values.
	Check them all out at PatriotBeeBest.com.
	See all the cool related bee products that they have there.
	And look at the links.
	They have one in particular, a video link.
	Why is our American bee population under attack?
	All of that is at PatriotBeBest.com.
	Do we have Gerald yet?
	Okay, let's take a quick break and we're going to be right back with Gerald Cilenti.
	Stay with us.
	♪♪
	You're listening to the David Knight show.
	All right.
	Welcome back.
	And joining us now is Gerald Salenti.
	I just want to let everybody know we'd had a problem and Marky Mark had sent this to us, said Rumble isn't allowing me to leave likes for the show.
	Travis said it was not working for a while.
	It looked like it was a Rumble thing, but now it is working.
	So if you would like the stream.
	That really does help us, and that is now working at Rumble.
	But again, it's not just Rumble.
	Wherever you catch the show, if you're getting it as recorded video, or if you're getting it as a podcast, audio podcast that you're downloading later, please like the show wherever you find it.
	We are heavily censored and shadow banned, and that's one of the few ways that we can get past it.
	Also remember that you can find us on Roku, just look for The David Knight Show there at Roku, and you can watch it on your TV set as well.
	Go to TheDavidKnightShow.com to find all the different places that you can find the program.
	And then joining us now is Gerald Salenti from TrendsResearch.com, TrendsJournal.com also.
	Both of those take you to the same place.
	You can see the Trends Journal samples there at TrendsJournal.com.
	Three hundred pages or so each week, and it is like an online magazine.
	Beautiful way that the information is there, but it's really the quality of information that is key.
	And the detail of it, and we're going to talk about a lot of things that That Gerald has been talking about this whole year.
	This year, he said, was going to be the year of gold, and it certainly has turned out that way.
	So we want to get his take on what's going on with the economy, what's going on with politics, and all the rest.
	Again, if you want to subscribe to the journal, Trends Journal, you can save 10% with the code KNIGHT, K-N-I-T-H-T.
	Thank you for joining us, Gerald.
	Good to have you on.
	Thank you for having me.
	And again, it's only $2.50 a week when you go to nighting.
	The Wall Street Journal's $5 a day.
	We hardly get anything from it.
	Oh, the big news.
	You know what the big news is?
	Some very big picture.
	Some very rich guy, a tycoon, his yacht sank.
	Oh, my God.
	A rich guy's yacht sank.
	Oh, my God.
	Oh, my God.
	I haven't even covered that this week.
	Yeah, I know.
	Day after day.
	What the hell do I care?
	Does anybody care that my sister just died?
	Or your mother, your father, your sister, your brother, your aunts, your uncles died?
	To hell with them.
	They're only regular people.
	That's right.
	A rich guy died.
	That's the crap they're shoving down the people's throat and that's why the people don't have a clue what's going on in the world.
	That's right.
	All they're doing is selling this clickbait crap because they're prostitutes, they're media whores that get paid to put out by their corporate pimps and their government whoremasters.
	This has been going on for a week.
	A week!
	I know.
	Oh, and then some other clown guy died of some... Harry, what the hell his name was?
	Some guy that was a comedian or something, and he OD'd on 2023, and this is what happened.
	What do I gotta know this stuff for?
	I know.
	Oh, they don't care about the tens of millions of people who died from the shots, do they?
	Not a word about that.
	But it's a tragedy when it happens to Matthew Perry or when it happens to this tycoon and his yacht sinks.
	And it is a tragedy for them, but again, as you point out, we don't need to know that.
	What the hell do I care?
	I don't care.
	That's not news.
	That's right.
	That's not news.
	What they're doing, these people are better than us.
	We are only plantation workers of slavelandia.
	Get that in your head, everybody.
	You're a nobody.
	That's right.
	There are the elites, the celebrities.
	What's celebrities?
	What's a little clown that knows how to play somebody else because they can't be themselves?
	Yeah.
	Celebrities.
	Yeah, they don't want you to know what they're injecting into your veins.
	They don't want you to know what they're dumping into your water with the fluoride stuff, the way they cover this.
	You know, because that's, uh, you know, you might catch on to something about that.
	So keep you distracted with all the stuff about the celebrities and the billionaires and things that are happening to them.
	That's, that's the Wall Street Journal business.
	Yeah.
	When you get to Trends Journal, you're getting, you're getting real news and we tell you what in the world is going on, what it means and what's next.
	We're political atheists.
	We don't take a side on anything, on anything.
	We call it the way it is.
	It's not what you like, what you want, what you wish for.
	It's what is.
	Yeah.
	And you said one of our top trends this year was a golden year for gold.
	Gold prices have gone up since we've said that.
	$470 an ounce.
	$470 an ounce.
	Wow.
	Wow. Wow. Yeah. That's a big.
	That was one of our top trends.
	And now as we're going up on the air, gold is now $2,507 an ounce.
	$1,507 an ounce.
	And you talked about the Jackson Hole, a hole, the hole in the wall.
	Yeah, it, they're gonna lower interest rates.
	interest rates.
	The lower interest rates go down, the deeper the dollar falls.
	The deeper the dollar falls, the higher gold prices go up.
	This isn't rocket science.
	We could see gold hitting this year easily $3,000 an ounce.
	Because then you have to, one of my, again, you know, I'm not BSing that bestselling book, International Trends 2000.
	Trend tracking.
	Far better than megatrends.
	Time magazine.
	I've been at this a lot of years.
	One of the things we say as trend forecasters, opportunity misses those who view the world through the eyes of their profession.
	So when you go like to CNBC, Bloomberg, all of these, all they talk about is economics.
	They rarely talk about the geopolitical elements going on that are very important with what's going to happen to the economy.
	And what's going to happen to the economy is the Israel war ramping up.
	They are egging Iran to get into it so the United States gets involved in it.
	And you heard that Camilla Hilarious last night saying how we have to fight against Iran.
	It's right there.
	She went on to say that, um, when we go with the love of a bar, um, let me see.
	Here we go.
	Yep.
	And know this.
	I will never hesitate to take whatever action is necessary to defend our forces and our interests against Iran.
	Our interests against Iran?
	Defend our forces?
	What the hell are we doing over there?
	Oh, you're illegally in Syria?
	Oh, we're over there stealing oil in eastern Syria.
	What the hell's the matter with you, Salenti?
	You think we would have invaded Iraq if their major export was broccoli?
	They're gonna ramp up this war, going back to gold.
	Oil prices at around $77 a barrel for Brent crude.
	They're going to double, nearly double if they go to war with Iran.
	And now they're ramping up the war against Russia.
	If they start attacking Russian oil pipelines and oil facilities and on and on, you're going to see oil prices go to about $130 a barrel.
	That will crash the global economy and crash the fake equity markets.
	Gold is the number one safe haven asset.
	We do not have any ads in the Trends Journal.
	We don't tell people what to do.
	We do not give financial advice.
	We're trend forecasters.
	And we're saying gold is the number one safe haven asset in the world and the prices are going to keep going up as the economy keeps going down and interest rates keep going down.
	And this is going to be the beginning of the death of the dollar when interest rates start going down.
	Yeah, yeah, and it's when you talk about what is happening with the oil and with with petrol, what they call it fossil fuels, we just call it petrochemicals and that type of thing.
	We had the Wall Street Journal that you were just talking about, you know, they want you focused on the billionaire who died and it shot, but they were putting out the disinformation There was some rogue group of people for Ukraine that blew up the pipeline, and they were doing that as a distraction earlier this week, and then we see the incursion into Russia that happened last week, into Kursk.
	They are ramping up the war, they're ramping up the lies and the propaganda and of course we saw from the very beginning of this how it affected Germany and others as they blew up that gas pipeline and now they want to have the war in the Middle East that's also going to hit oil.
	It's going to be some rough times because that's going to send a shock through the system.
	Inflation is really coming Ultimately from money creation, but they can send the shock through the system with energy shocks, just as we saw with the OPEC embargo we all lived through.
	You and I are old enough to remember that.
	You're 100% correct.
	Yeah.
	100% correct.
	So it's very serious what's going on.
	And again, if we don't have peace, it's going to be, it's going to be the end of life on earth.
	It's going to be the end of life on earth.
	Look, you go to your trends journal, go back a year and a half ago.
	We said that Ukraine is going to target Russian-occupied, in Ukraine and in Russia, nuclear power plants.
	We said they were going to do this.
	And they're doing.
	Then you go to this week's Trends Journal and read the article about how Putin has said They have advanced their nuclear weaponry attacks, putting them in place in the event war happens and they have the targets in Europe.
	They've already said that.
	We've got the targets already lined up.
	If this thing keeps going up, it's going nuclear.
	We are on the cusp of the end of life on Earth.
	You better get this in your head, everybody.
	People say, oh, you're angry.
	Yeah, I'm angry.
	And St.
	Thomas Aquinas said those who are not angry when it's justifiably moral to be angry are immoral.
	I'm angry.
	I don't like my money going to kill other people, and I don't like my government killing other people.
	I'm a man of peace.
	I'm a warrior for the Prince of Peace.
	And as I said, you know, it was the cover of the magazine, the Trends Journal, back in 2011.
	You see that cover?
	Yeah.
	The Prince of Peace became violent, making a whip to drive the Goldman Sachs, the Merrill Lynch mob, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, Wells Fargo, out of the temple.
	It's the same criminal group.
	It's the same criminal group.
	Nothing has changed.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And they put him up on a cross.
	Look what they're doing to Scott Ritter.
	Yeah, yeah.
	A man that's anti-war.
	FBI raiding his house.
	Yeah, I talked about that on here when it happened a couple weeks ago.
	And you know, earlier this week we had Phil Donahue die, and I played a clip where he was talking about the fact that he got the same treatment you did, and I mentioned the fact that, you know, what they did to you when you opposed the Iraq War, they did the same thing to him.
	Took him off the air because, and that was it, you know, he was done because he opposed the war.
	That's the way these guys roll.
	And I mean, and now we've seen that for, you know, you oppose the COVID lockdowns and the jabs and all this other kind of stuff.
	They've got a long list of things now that they will ban us for.
	But as we look at it, let's go back to the Ukraine thing.
	She had another red line as they went into Kursk, and they keep saying, well, you know, that'd be a red line, and then they cross that red line and wait to see if Putin's gonna do anything.
	He doesn't do anything.
	They go to the next line.
	They're incrementally trying to move us towards a nuclear war by crossing one red line after the other and daring him to do something about it.
	But let me ask you this.
	There was, this week, I reported How in Germany they said, all right, we're not going to give any more money to Ukraine.
	I don't know if that's real or not, but there's a big fight within the country because of what happened with the gas pipelines, because of what is happening with energy, and because they had to put together a ruling coalition.
	What is your read on that?
	Do you think that Germany is going to, in fact, Pull back from this?
	Is it going to be an issue?
	Because they've given a lot of money to Ukraine.
	Probably not as much as we have, but they gave of all the European countries, Germany has given the most.
	What do you think is going to happen with that?
	Well, it is true that the left-wing, they passed the resolution, that passed that they want to hold back the money, but they're going to do everything they can to turn it around.
	Yeah, yeah.
	You know, that's the way it is.
	That's a big part of why they did this Kursk invasion, to show, well, we got a chance of winning this thing, and oh, what they got is a chance of starting off, kicking off a nuclear war, is what they've got a chance of.
	You know, I am so sick and tired of this This is spewing out of the mouth of Camilla Hilarious last night.
	One of the BS lines is, if only women were in charge, it'd be people on earth.
	This is spewing out of the mouth of Camilla Hilarious last night.
	This is her quote.
	As commander in chief, stop right there.
	Commander in chief, a little clown, and they're all clowns.
	You look at the cover of this week's Trends Journal, Disney World, Disney World White House, Minnie Mouse versus Donald Duck.
	Anyway, as Commander-in-Chief, you ready?
	I will ensure America America always has the strongest, you ready?
	Most lethal fighting force in the world.
	Isn't that nice?
	Lethal.
	Yeah.
	Lethal.
	Deadly.
	Oh, if only women were in charge and then she goes on.
	Five days before Russia attacked Ukraine, I met with President Zelensky to warn him about Russia's plan to invade.
	I helped mobilize a global response over 15 countries to defend against Putin's aggression.
	As president, I will stand strongly with Ukraine and our NATO allies.
	If only women were in charge.
	Oh yeah.
	Oh, you will stand strongly?
	What are you gonna go?
	You gonna go over there and fight?
	You're not going to stand strongly, you're just going to spew out more crap, steal our money, to give it to them, to the military industrial complex, to keep blooding the killing fields, as our country is rotting in front of our eyes.
	Aren't the roads lovely?
	The roads up here in Kingston are crap.
	From here to New York City, from here up to Canada, they're crap.
	The bridges are rotting.
	Yeah, this is an article yesterday in the Toilet Paper Record, the New York Times.
	Where is it over here?
	Yeah.
	Right?
	Yeah, look at this.
	Service, series of service delays exposes Amtrak's ancient equipment.
	Yeah.
	You got a third world rail system.
	Take a trip in New York on the subway.
	It's a night in Calcutta.
	Yeah.
	High speed rail all over the world and we got crap.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	That's because the military-industrial complex and the people like Peter Thiel and Eric Schmidt are making so much money with their wars and their surveillance and their police state and all the rest of the stuff.
	You know, they were talking about the fact just this morning I saw that they've got 17 naval ships that they have to keep at port because they have insufficient manpower.
	Manpower.
	Manpower, not woman power.
	Insufficient manpower.
	Because they've driven everybody out of the military with their DEI and their VAX mandates and all the rest of this stuff.
	Nobody wants to be a part of that.
	So even their military, they can't keep it going.
	That's only part of it.
	The other thing is they're too fat to fight.
	We're going to squish the enemy, right?
	I'm not making that up.
	The data's there.
	Yeah, I'm out.
	The dad is there.
	They're military.
	These guys come in.
	They're, you know, again, once upon a time when we were young guys, there was the Ringling Brothers and Barnum Bailey Circus.
	It went out of business.
	You know why?
	You don't have to step right up, step right up, see the fat man, see the tattooed lady, see the lady with the beard.
	They're out in the street everywhere now.
	You don't have to pay to see them.
	I've made that comment before.
	When I was in college, I played in bands and stuff.
	And one year we were in Tampa, one year we had a New Year's Eve gig in Sarasota with the retired circus freaks.
	And I said, it's way freakier now than anything we saw there.
	It was, that was kind of unusual, but it's not, like you said, just walk down the street today and it's a lot freakier than that party was.
	Yeah.
	I mean, all the, I mean, tattooed to death.
	Yeah.
	It's very healthy to put all that stuff into your bloodstream.
	It's great for you.
	Yeah.
	You were saying about here.
	You're talking about the military industrial... First of all, this is a quote, by the way.
	He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral.
	Why?
	Because anger looks to the good of justice.
	And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.
	Yeah.
	St.
	Thomas Aquinas.
	He's right about that.
	That's well said.
	And then you talked about the military-industrial complex.
	Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed.
	Those who are cold and not clothed.
	The world in arms is not spending money alone.
	It's spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of the scientists, the hopes of the children.
	This is not a way of life at all in any true sense.
	Under the clouds of war, It is humanity hanging on a cross of iron.
	Dwight D. Eisenhower, two-term president, Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces before that, and five-star general.
	He hated war because he saw it.
	Yes, yes.
	But you know, Tim Walz didn't see it.
	He ran away.
	And all these other people.
	Lindsey Graham never bothered to go.
	Lala Harris didn't sign up.
	So, yeah, I mean, they're the armchair quarterbacks who can look at it as, you know, pens on a map, and they don't see the blood.
	Again, I am sick and tired of this crap that if only women were in charge, that is sexist!
	Yeah.
	That there would be no war.
	How about Hillary Clinton?
	When asked on the show by the CBS, how did you feel when you found out that Muammar Gaddafi was killed?
	We came, we saw, he died.
	Right?
	How about Madeleine not all that bright?
	You went U.S.
	Ambassador to the United Nations on Leslie Stahl.
	Leslie Stahl asked, is the price of 500,000 Iraqi children under the age of five that have died because of what Bill Clinton has put on sanctions and what he's done to Iraq worth the price?
	She said, yes, it is.
	I am tired of this.
	And by the way, it's also sexist to keep calling these drinks cocktails.
	We've got to use the other word to get the women into it.
	I can't say that.
	I can't say that word.
	I won't say it.
	How stupid is this crap?
	Yeah, we could have had a cocktail every time they said joy or freedom or whatever.
	These people don't support any freedom.
	And the only joy they get is in starting wars and telling us what we can't do and locking us down and all the rest of the stuff.
	They find a great deal of joy in that.
	They can hardly conceal.
	You talk about women.
	Leaders, look at Jabsin Arden, you know, and how cocky she was during the lockdown.
	When people said, so you're setting up a two-tier system here, she goes, yep, yep, that's what it is, and she laughs.
	I mean, it's just disgusting.
	And then where does she go?
	She gets a job at Harvard, right?
	Oh yeah, that's right.
	As George Carlin says, one big club and you ain't in it.
	Yeah, that's right.
	One big club and you ain't in it.
	Yes.
	Yeah, she goes on.
	I will make sure that we lead the world into the future on space and artificial intelligence, that America, not China, wins the competition for the 21st century, and that we strengthen, not abdicate, our global leadership.
	What global leadership you talking about?
	How about just worrying about America and let the rest of the world solve their own problems?
	It's not my concern.
	I am an American who believes in the founding fathers like George Washington that said not to get involved in any foreign entanglements.
	Basically, this crap has been going on for thousands of years.
	That's right.
	And we're not going to fix it.
	She goes on.
	Trump, on the other hand, threatened to abandon NATO.
	He encouraged Putin to invade our allies and said Russia could do whatever the hell they want.
	And I agree because it's none of my business.
	I write a magazine.
	I only put facts in it.
	And here's the magazine.
	You see how happy that guy is?
	This is 2014.
	It's the United States overthrow of the democratically elected government of Viktor Yanukovych by the United States, written by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.
	Yeah, the good PCR.
	He presented the perfect opportunity for Washington to advance its hegemonic agenda in a speech at the National Press Club last December, which means 2013.
	Everybody can look this up.
	Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland boasted that Washington had invested $5 billion in non-governmental organizations, NGOs in Ukraine, for the purpose to teach democracy.
	Washington is driving the world to the final war.
	World hegemony is not a right America has earned.
	But people have no idea about this, don't have a clue.
	All they do is swallow the crap of the mainstream media.
	And we keep hearing all this stuff about democracy as they shut down our speech, as they look at how they manipulated this election.
	It's the most ridiculous thing.
	This is the party of democracy, right?
	And they're going to just pick one candidate.
	It's never been more obvious that they are selecting these people, that they don't have any elections.
	They don't even pretend to have any elections anymore, just like they don't pretend to follow the Constitution or the rest of the stuff.
	The pretense has come off and they're doing it openly now.
	That's the scary thing, I think.
	Yep.
	Oh, about BS, all this freedom stuff, freedom, freedom, freedom, while your political gang is robbing it from us?
	Mm-hmm.
	I mean, you know, you can't, again, this is, this is perfect Orwellian, draconian, right in front of everybody's eyes.
	That's right.
	Freedom, freedom, freedom.
	Oh, you're going to appoint a misinformation czar?
	And you're talking about freedom?
	Yeah.
	No jab, no job?
	Freedom?
	That's right.
	What are you talking about?
	Yeah, my body, my choice, right?
	They didn't say that when it came to the jab, which really was people's bodies.
	No question about that, right?
	But they don't care about that.
	The absolute hypocrisy.
	And of course, Republicans won't call them out on that because Republicans were in on that tyranny as well.
	And so they can't do that.
	They can't obviously call them out and say, you're talking about people making their own medical decisions.
	Well, what happened in 2020 and 2021 and 2022 and so forth?
	They won't say that because they were a part of that as well.
	You're 100% right.
	Going back to what you said about the, you know, not calling them out.
	We called Kamala Harris out in the Trends Journal in May of 2022, midterm elections.
	We sent out a special trend alert to all our subscribers a month ago.
	A month ago in July.
	You ready?
	Mm-hmm.
	Kamala Harris 2024.
	The Trends Journal's May 2022 forecast.
	The Trends Journal had forecast that Joe Biden would step down and Kamala Harris would run for president in 2024.
	And now we forecast, minus the wild card such as stock market crash, Harris will beat Donald Trump in the race for the White House.
	Yeah.
	We go on to say that She knows that her boss is an unpopular president who is 79 years old at the time and she wants to be the party standard-bearer and needs to start making a name for herself.
	Being that the Biden administration is viewed as ineffective in bringing down inflation and strongly boosting the economy, you ready?
	Harris will seize upon abortion rights because there seems to be only two things she can unite her front.
	The Ukraine war and Support and pro-abortion.
	Yep, that's right.
	And that's exactly what she did last night.
	Her talk about pro-abortion was the longest of anything she talked about.
	We go on to say that the Republicans will not do well in the midterm elections because of their anti-abortion stance.
	And that's exactly what happened.
	You certainly called it.
	Absolutely true.
	Absolutely true.
	Yeah.
	Now, if, you know, if there's a stock market crash, I guess it'd be interesting to see if there's a stock market crash, if it would help her for them.
	No, I'm saying for to help mitigate it, to pull out Biden and to put her in as president, you know, that might be something that they could pull that, that might help to distract people, you know, because people, They can't focus.
	They've got an attention span of about 20 seconds.
	I think there's going to be a lot of things that are going to happen in the next couple of months between now and the election, frankly.
	Oh, anything.
	Again, if the economy crashes, again, going back to Jackson Hole, they're going to lower interest rates.
	They're going to do everything they can to pump up the economy.
	Before we went on the air, we were talking about the phony job numbers, right?
	Yeah, yeah.
	Look how they promoted.
	Almost a million jobs were lost that they lied about.
	Yeah, that's right.
	But as they're lying and saying a great jobs report, the markets kept going up.
	A great jobs report, the markets kept going up.
	Great jobs report, the markets kept going up.
	They're doing this for a year.
	This is the worst downturn, not a downturn, a readmission of how bad the numbers are that since 2009.
	And they lied about it back then because the Great Recession was going on.
	Right, exactly.
	And they lied about it then.
	Which is kind of an admission, isn't it, about the recession that we're in right now?
	And, you know, that's the sort of thing, and I've talked about that, the fact that they will always give you inflated numbers for right now, and then they will revise the previous quarters to make it look even better.
	Oh, look at the trend.
	It's always getting better, right?
	But this is, you pointed out, the worst lie that they have told, except in the middle of the Great Recession.
	Yeah.
	Only one.
	And that was only slightly bigger.
	Yeah.
	Amazing.
	So what's going on?
	We are in the worst geopolitical and socioeconomic crisis.
	Again, I'm at this for 44 years.
	And I'll put my track record up against anybody.
	Show me a book, show me a magazine, and then we can start talking.
	We are in the worst crisis in We are going to have the worst financial crisis in the history of the world, part one and part two.
	And again, if we don't stop these wars from going on, it's going to be the end of life on earth.
	World War II is not ancient history.
	Yeah.
	That's right.
	Absolutely right.
	So what is the best As we look at these trends, what is the best we can do?
	Assuming that there's not a war.
	Assuming that it's just going to go down these economic scenarios.
	Gold is something that is the best safe haven.
	Is there anything else that you would recommend?
	Yeah, if you want to gamble, it's a gamble.
	I gamble on the Bitcoin thing.
	I started buying it at $17,000.
	It's a gamble.
	And if there wasn't a Bitcoin, you'd see gold probably double the price it is now.
	And they're going to keep that going until they go digital currencies, which is going to happen.
	Because then they know every penny you spent, where you spent it, what you spent it on, so the scum politicians could get their money for tax purposes.
	Because they never work a day in their life.
	Look at Biden, how many years he's sucking off the public tit.
	What, 60 years?
	Yeah.
	And again, this is important too, David.
	Trump, Trump, Trump, Biden, Greenberg, Iceberg, what's the difference?
	Anyway, Trump, Biden, Biden may, he might wake up one day and said, and here we have very bad news.
	President Joe Biden has come down with a series of very illnesses or something like that.
	Got monkey pox.
	The monkey pox, the monkey brain.
	And he is turning over, he's resigning as president and Kamala Harris will become president of the United States.
	Now that even brings her up to hire.
	She's going to get, again, you go by the numbers, that's all we do.
	We go by the numbers.
	She's going to get the woman vote.
	She's going to get the black vote.
	She's going to get most of the Hispanic vote and the Asian vote.
	The numbers are there.
	Again, it's not what you want, what you like, what you wish for, it's what is.
	Again, the data.
	This is from, this was 2023.
	NBC News noted that the Public Policy Research Institute ran a national poll in February that found 64% of Americans think abortion should be legal.
	Mm-hmm.
	Mm-hmm.
	The poll was broken down by political affiliation.
	87% of Democrats, 65% of Independents.
	Mm-hmm.
	It's, this is not, this is no-brainer.
	And again, what's very important, it's a reality show.
	We own the trademark, Presidential Reality Show.
	If you watch that clown show, To put on that convention costs tens of millions of dollars.
	100,000 balloons falling or something.
	It's a show.
	The kids come out dancing.
	It's a show.
	It's a show.
	It's a scripted reality show.
	That's all you're watching.
	It's another chapter, another day, another week.
	This thing is all scripted out, and you saw Oprah Winfrey.
	Mm-hmm.
	You go back to the Trends Journal, what was it, 2008, when Obama ran.
	I think it was 2008, 2010, I forget.
	Anyway, we said that when, that was the first time, and I was on Oprah twice.
	I have the mugs, the proof.
	You can look it up.
	And I, and nobody, and I used to be on everybody, as you know, as CNN, USA Today, Today Show, Good Morning America, everybody, everybody, everybody, everybody.
	Fox, nobody put on a show like Oprah.
	She was the top of the top.
	What a, what a, what a crew she had, what a, sensational.
	We wrote that when she took Obama under her wing, he became a different person, a whole different actor.
	She's an act.
	This is an act.
	Yeah.
	Camilla Harris has been groomed by the Disney gang, by her husband, was an entertainment lawyer, and she's... Oprah is teaching her how to play the game.
	She's an actress.
	That's all this is.
	It's an act.
	Yeah.
	And they're at the top.
	And she's very controlled.
	I mean, she's not going to go out and do some interview or press conference with somebody because she'd have to ad-lib, but it's very controlled.
	Yep.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, it's not over till the fat lady sings.
	and so I guess you know when Oprah Oprah saying it was that was it you know yes that's it She's gonna, she's gonna blow him out.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And again, the other vote are the people, if Biden ran, the I hate Trump-ers would not have gone out.
	They're gonna go out too.
	They'll go out to vote.
	She's gonna get the woman vote, the young vote, the black vote, the Hispanic vote, and the Asian vote.
	Now, what's your take on RFK Jr.?
	Because, you know, a lot of people say, oh, that's it.
	Now, if he endorses Trump, it's all over.
	I don't see it that way.
	Because I think, you know, I've watched what happens because I've been involved in third party politics.
	I've watched what happens with independents and third parties.
	People go there.
	Most of them are dissatisfied with the two party system.
	But at the very end, most of them will go with a lesser of two evils type of thing.
	I think that's going to happen again this time.
	What do you think?
	What's going to happen?
	You're 100% right.
	Yeah.
	And what a term that people actually use, the lesser of two evils.
	Yeah.
	That's like saying almost pregnant.
	There's no such thing as a lesser of two evils.
	Evil is evil.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	And all these, you know, as I said, you know, it's not what you like, what you want, what you wish for, but the hypocrisy of these so-called anti-abortion evangelical Christians, like this clown boy that's the Democratic guy that runs the show in the House, Mike Johnson.
	Oh, I'm anti-abortion, but kill anybody anywhere.
	Kill all those Gazans, those Palestinians.
	More weapons to keep blooding the killing fields over there in Ukraine.
	But don't kill the unborn, only kill the living.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Hypocrisy, these people.
	It is awful.
	It is awful.
	And it is indefensible as well.
	And everybody sees it!
	You know, everybody sees it.
	They think that nobody sees that, but everybody does see it.
	You know, there's an interesting article on Reason.
	They said Trump and Harris's economic plans are depressingly similar.
	And of course, the similarity is...
	Is that they believe that government can and should solve all the problems centrally.
	And why is it this way?
	Reason doesn't answer it, but I think it is because both the people who are supporting them as hardcore, both those groups, See government as savior, government as solution, and they are demanding that they come up with solutions to these problems.
	Now, they see the problems slightly differently, and they've got slightly different solutions and so forth.
	But the fundamental thing that is the same with all of them is that they think that the federal government needs to solve every problem and that it can solve every problem if they only get the right person there.
	And that's what's really tearing our country apart.
	And it's what's making us so susceptible to this massive corruption.
	I mean, just look at the money that's there.
	She made half a billion dollars in contributions in the first month.
	That's what she got.
	I know.
	That's great.
	Again, we write about this week after week after week.
	The billionaires, it got no money, you got no chance to return for office.
	And you said it earlier.
	We've got two damn parties running the whole country.
	They call this a democracy?
	We're bringing freedom and democracy to other countries and we don't have it over here?
	Mm-hmm.
	You got the choice of these two clown shows?
	Which bunch of jerks do you like the best?
	I like Lindsey Graham.
	Oh, I like Chucky Shuma.
	You know?
	I mean, look at a little clown show!
	That's right.
	Yeah, and you got Menendez, he's out there stashing up gold bars.
	Which, by the way, you know, as gold got up to $2,500 an ounce, that means that one bar of gold like that, like Menendez had, is worth a million bucks.
	So he's got these gold bars there.
	At least he was smart about that.
	He wasn't smart about the crimes that he committed, but he was smart about how he wanted to be paid.
	But as he's had, this isn't his first rodeo.
	First one, he was able to get off because Lindsey Graham comes in as a character witness.
	That's the most laughable thing about his first trial, is that anybody would think if Lindsey Graham is your character witness that you wouldn't be de facto guilty, you know?
	The perfect name for Lindsey Graham, a character.
	Yeah, yeah, that's right.
	And they keep quoting this slob.
	They keep quoting him.
	You know, where I am, up in my office here, right?
	Back in the day, I used to be on Fox.
	And they used to send a truck up here to satellite things back in the day.
	Oh yeah, yeah.
	So they come up here, they're doing an interview.
	This is like during, you know, when the whole Panic of 08 was going on.
	I took that domain name out, Panic of 08 in 2007.
	I'm doing a live show on Fox.
	They got the truck up here and everything.
	Mr. Salenti, we have to take a break.
	Senator Graham is coming on to talk about... I swear to God.
	They keep quoting this jerk.
	He's a nobody.
	Yeah.
	He's an arrogant nobody.
	It's amazing.
	And then, you know, you talk about these chicken war hawks, right?
	Tim Walz.
	He's got another one that's just come out.
	You know, besides the fact that he took a powder when his unit was going to go to the Iraq war, right?
	And then he continues to inflate his rank.
	And now the new thing on him is that he's been claiming that he re-upped Because of 9-11.
	And it turns out that the dates don't match up for any of this stuff, right?
	But this guy is making himself into this fake war hero.
	He's probably even worse than Lindsey Graham.
	Because they all want war, but you know, Lindsey Graham has not padded his resume that much.
	He's another one of the people who's been in National Guard for a long time and he's never done anything.
	But Tim Walz is just, it's amazing to me.
	But again, I think you're right.
	I think that's not going to be the main issues.
	Nah, people don't care about that.
	So talk about this RFK Jr.
	thing.
	Give us your take on that.
	It's not going anywhere.
	Again, you know what happened.
	RFK Jr.
	had a great shot.
	Again, we're having a peace and freedom rally here on September 28th.
	And you were here at one of them.
	We're going to have Max Blumenthal.
	Anya Parampil, Scott Ritter, Judge Napolitano, and others.
	On September 28th, go to OccupyPeace, OccupyPeace.com, and please donate.
	We can't do this.
	If billionaires gave us money for peace, we'd have peace tomorrow.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, and Judge Napolitano, he wants, and we gotta get a million people.
	We gotta close down the thruway.
	We gotta make the news that we want peace.
	So anyway, going back, what was your question?
	I'm sorry, I lost the... RFK Jr.
	Oh, okay.
	So at one of the rallies, not this May, but last May, We had Dennis Kucinich, that was RFK Jr.' 's campaign manager, was one of the speakers here.
	I was on the phone with RFK Jr.
	twice.
	I donated the most amount of money that an individual could donate to RFK's campaign, $6,600.
	Kucinich quit as the campaign manager and I got my money back. When RFK Jr.
	and said to the effect that there's no more spoiled people on earth than the Palestinians and his pro-Israel genocide statements over and over again.
	That was the beginning of the end of his campaign.
	He had a great opportunity.
	He lost all the support.
	From the people that want to see a new system and believed in him because he was so anti-Ukraine war, but so pro-Israel war.
	That was the end of RFK Jr.
	Yeah.
	He's going nowhere fast.
	Supporting Trump, big deal.
	No deal.
	I agree.
	I thought that he was untrustworthy from the very beginning because of the fact that he would not come clean about what he said about locking up people who had opposed radical climate issues.
	And nobody asked him about that for the longest time.
	Finally, when somebody did, he lied about it.
	And he said, no, I wasn't talking about the Koch brothers.
	I was talking about their companies.
	No, he's talking about, you know, three hots and a cot.
	You don't do that to a corporation.
	So, you know, he didn't come clean on that.
	I had tried to contact him.
	I actually had an interview that was set up with him when he put out the Fauci book, and I thought it was a good book.
	I liked Chapter 12 especially.
	It was about the germ games and things like that, and I had interviewed The head of Children's Health Defense in California, she's an heiress of the Oscar Mayer fortune, and we had a good rapport when I did the interview with her, and I said, can you get him on?
	I'd like to talk to him.
	We had it all set up, and just before the program began, he canceled out.
	And they would not reschedule.
	And that was before he was running for office.
	I mean, it was going to be a friendly interview.
	There wasn't really anything that I was going to criticize him for.
	There wasn't any point of going back and talking about his climate radicalism until he ran for president.
	And then I didn't trust that.
	If he's going to call for locking up opponents, that's a big issue for free speech.
	And if he's going to run as a free speech candidate, he needs to address that right up front.
	I don't support that anymore because I've learned better.
	That'd be fine, but he wouldn't do that, and so I really didn't trust him.
	Yeah.
	Well, I could tell you one evening, Judge Napolitano and Scott Ritter and myself were out for dinner one night, and this is when Kennedy started becoming pro-Israeli genocide, and the judge says, let me text him.
	And he said, you know, I'm here with Gerald and Scott and, you know, we don't support your position on Israel and I'd like you to just tell us why you're doing this.
	And he wrote back, texted back something very nasty and, you know, he wouldn't talk about it or anything else and that was the end of it.
	Interesting.
	And again, I do podcasts with Judge Napolitano every Wednesday, so you can see them on the Gerald Cilenti channel or the Trends Journal channel.
	And I'm telling you that you've got to see this Judging Freedom, the judge's show.
	The people that he has on there are spectacular.
	And Phil Giraldi, Colonel McGregor, and they're really calling it out, man.
	And it's a good show for everybody to consider looking at, Judging Freedom.
	Boy, you should get Colonel McGregor on.
	I'm sure you tried to get him.
	It'd be great if you could for the Occupy Peace thing.
	Yeah.
	We know each other and we correspond back and forth and he's considering it.
	Yeah, he's spot on.
	He's been 100% right on all this stuff.
	Absolutely.
	Yeah, it's too bad we can't get people like him.
	This country doesn't deserve leaders as good as Colonel McGregor, does it?
	I look at the it's a clown show.
	Yeah.
	Again, it's a reality show.
	This whole thing is scripted out.
	Yeah, we wrote it again.
	We wrote back in 2023 that they were going to get rid of Biden.
	People knew he was out of his mind in 2022, excuse me, that he was out of his mind.
	This is all set up.
	Never, ever before did they have a debate in June.
	That's right.
	They did the debate with Biden and Trump in June to show that Biden was out of his mind so they could pull him out.
	No, I absolutely agree.
	I said that myself.
	I said, look at how ridiculous this is.
	Usually, you know, the first debate is a month or more after, sometimes two months.
	Usually they had the last conventions at the beginning of August, and they would have the first debate at the end of September, and then have another one in the middle of October, and then the end of October.
	So to put it a couple months before their convention, to move their convention later, and to move the debate that much earlier, it was obvious.
	But I think they also Had planned out that they wanted to run against Trump.
	And I think that, you know, when you look at all of the petty lawfare against Trump, which was absurd, and it made him into a martyr, and it meant that nobody had a chance to run against him.
	He didn't debate anybody.
	I mean, he skipped the whole process as well.
	And so they, with their actions, they guaranteed that he was going to get the nomination.
	And Nikki Haley, who I absolutely despise, she is She's one of the worst examples of stuff, but she's savvy when it comes to politics.
	And she said, you know, back in January, February, she said, whoever replaces, whichever party replaces Trump or Biden is going to win.
	So she said, it's going to be me or it's going to be Lala.
	And she was right about that.
	I really think she was, you know, it was, they engineered the fact that they made sure that Trump was not going to get replaced.
	And then they engineered it to replace Biden.
	I think it was the plan all along.
	By the way, I showed something earlier this week which I just thought was a hoot.
	You gotta look it up, Gerald.
	Maybe put it in Trends Journal.
	One of the reasons I think they are so fixated on nobody calling her Kamala is there was a Kamala Harris professional wrestler back in the 1980s, a big heavy black guy who wore like war paint and everything.
	I guess they don't want any association with her and professional wrestling because this whole thing is about professional wrestling, isn't it?
	It is.
	It's a show.
	Yeah.
	This is her opening statement to Joe Biden.
	Mr. President, when I think about the path we have traveled together, I am filled with gratitude.
	You ready?
	Your record is extraordinary and history will show as history will show extraordinary.
	Well, she didn't say it was extraordinarily good.
	I mean, you know, it is.
	And your character is inspiring.
	Yeah, he's a character.
	All right.
	Doug and I love you and Jill, and I am forever thankful to you both.
	I think she meant his character was expiring.
	Yeah.
	And then then you're ready for this.
	Yeah.
	Hello, Americans.
	This election is not only the most important of our lives, you ready?
	It is one of the most important in the life of our nation.
	Yeah, it's crazy.
	Well, it certainly is a reality TV show, but it is very important to understand the trends, and of course, you saw all this stuff coming.
	We just had, you know, even more talk this last week.
	I think it was, I forget which city it was in.
	Commercial real estate was auctioned off at 25% less than they'd expected, which was probably a gift.
	They could even sell it at any price, you know.
	All of that is coming, as you pointed out, the snowball for the banking system that is going to build onto the commercial real estate collapse and all the rest of this stuff.
	We're up for some difficult times.
	It's a good thing to understand and to be able to see where the trends are going.
	As you pointed out, if you use the code KNIGHT, you can get Trends Journal for just $2.50 a week and a massive amount of content.
	There's a wide variety of topics and articles in it each week.
	And again, use the code Knight, go to Trends Journal, and you need to have all the information that you can get, and there's a lot of information there.
	Thank you so much, Gerald, for coming on.
	I really do appreciate it.
	Thank you.
	Thank you for all that you do.
	I really appreciate it.
	Thank you.
	I want to remind everybody again, the Occupy Peace thing coming up September 28th, is that correct, in Kingston?
	That's right.
	Go to OccupyPeace.com.
	Occupy Peace for the information.
	Good, good.
	Yeah, people need to turn out for that if they can.
	It's very important that we show that we want peace.
	Maybe they would pay some attention to it.
	Who knows?
	It's always worth a try.
	Thank you so much, Gerald.
	I appreciate it.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	And again, not a peep about peace from either Trump or Harris.
	Not a peep about peace.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Yeah, well, you know, we know who's running the country, don't we?
	The military-industrial complex is absolutely doing it.
	Well, folks, before we end, I just want to let all of you know how much we appreciate your support, and we certainly could use your support.
	Go to TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	You can see where the gas gauge is, and you can see how much we need your support.
	So, we really would appreciate that.
	We're going to be back next week, and for Labor Day, I am going to take a day off next Friday, so we'll see what happens through the week.
	But we are right there, right about the midpoint with our gas gate, so we can certainly use your support.
	If you want to know where you can find the show, and if you'd like to know how you can support us, you can see it there at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Well, as we hold our breath and wait to see what is going to happen with RFK Jr.
	and with Jerome Powell, just understand that your life is not held hostage to these people any more than your life matters, that it matters to your life what is happening to these famous people and these tragedies that happen to them.
	Personally, they don't care about the tragedies that happen to you.
	And so focus your efforts on how you can raise your family, the things that you can do for your family that are going to take you out of this control system that they have set up for all of us.
	When we look at what is happening at the The DNC, as I said, Reason Magazine, said Trump and Harris's economic plans are depressingly similar.
	They're variations on a theme of big, fiscally irresponsible, hyper-interventionist government.
	Government as your savior, government as the solution to the problems that you have in life for the people who really don't care about the problems that you have in life, no matter how many times they try to assure you of that.
	Both candidates have a penchant for industrial policy.
	Both candidates are going to pick the winning and the losing industries.
	And so they hit Lala Harris for trying to subsidize the green agenda, for both parties wanting to subsidize the semiconductor industry.
	But look, let's understand that both of these parties, as Gerald said, neither of them talk about peaceful, neither of them talk about getting rid of the Paris Climate Accord, for example.
	That is a fundamental root problem that is dragging our society down, and neither one of them are going to call the bluff that that essentially is, to say that we've got to shut down our industry, shut down our life because of some imaginary problem.
	And it's an imaginary Both candidates spend recklessly.
	Neither of them are talking about the debt or the deficit either.
	said we're going to officially get out of it but it's going to take me four years to do it. Well why do you think they set it up that way? So that no president would have the ability to get out or they could say that they're going to get out exactly what Trump did and not get out. Both candidates spend recklessly. Neither of them are talking about the debt or the deficit either.
	These are the fundamental problems and of course none of them are talking about Reducing even the size of the IRS's...
	Instead, they're going to stand along with Mike Johnson to increase it by a factor of seven.
	Why are they doing that?
	It is to rob you blind.
	To make sure that you own nothing.
	Well, have a good weekend.
	We'll talk to you on Monday.
	The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Night Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲