Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 22, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:40

The David Knight Show - 08/22/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Bye.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday the 22nd of August, year of our Lord, two thousand twenty-one.
	Well, today we're going to begin with Trump and RFK Jr., because I think it's not so much interesting as far as the selection goes, because it is a selection.
	Everybody is so vicariously focused on what's going to happen in one office, the most distant Office, the one that more money is poured into than anything else.
	But I think it shows us the political map that we have now.
	You can choose between Marxists and Democrats.
	We're also going to go back and take a look at more information about nanotech and the vaccines.
	And it's very interesting to go back to a paper that is almost a decade old, where the IEEE was talking about that very thing.
	So we'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	As I said, we have now a landscape that is looking more and more like which Democrat Or do you want to vote for a Marxist?
	RFK Jr.
	can save liberalism by endorsing Trump.
	Says QTR's Fringe Finance.
	RFK Jr.
	said on Twitter, he said the Democrat Party positions itself as a party of liberty.
	That's a joke.
	Lala Harris says that Americans should make personal decisions without the government telling them what to do.
	Where was she in the last four years?
	Tim Walz's golden rule is mind your own damn business, he says.
	What if they were to do that?
	In view of the censorship, the surveillance, the vaccine mandates, the Confederacy of Fixers openly working to prevent me from getting on the ballots, this is like the arsonist telling us that he's a firefighter.
	I'm running to make America once again the land of liberty, said RFK Jr.
	And then on Tuesday, We had the headlines hit that he could wind up dropping out of the race.
	So he will, he will.
	It's now being widely reported.
	And, um, as NBC pointed out, he will be in Phoenix tomorrow as Trump is holding a rally in Phoenix tomorrow.
	Uh, he's going to make his announcement, his big announcement, whatever that is in the morning, Trump is going to have an event in the evening.
	And I imagine that event will include him.
	But of course, when we look at Nicole Shanahan talking about how the DNC sabotaged their campaign, as I pointed out yesterday, she said there's two options.
	One is to stay in and form a new party, but then we run the risk, she said, of having Kamilala and the Waltz presidency because we draw more votes from Trump.
	Or we walk away right now, we join forces with Trump, and we explain to our base why we're making this decision.
	That was what she was doing.
	She was doing option number two, of course.
	She was explaining to her base why she's making the decision.
	Explaining to the base why they're going to be walking away.
	Preparing that, essentially.
	So, the person is writing this QDR fringe.
	It says, When I saw the headlines last week from the Washington Post that Kennedy was trying to meet with Harris to discuss a cabinet job, he said he didn't believe it.
	He has sources who were reporting that Kennedy wanted Harris' help was a load of crap, he said.
	Instead, they informed me that a family member of RFK Jr.
	had tried to convince him at a wedding to talk to Harris on the phone.
	A source said, we were at a wedding, and one of RFK Jr.' 's cousins was like, let me please put you on the phone with Lala just to talk, and then they didn't want to have a phone call.
	And so he said, it's RFK Jr.' 's deal, he said, the source said, is to talk to anyone, anytime, so it's not out of character.
	Is that what he does?
	Does he talk to anyone at any time?
	Doesn't talk to me!
	You know, it's interesting because you remember I had said when he came out with the Fauci book, I had told everybody he was going to be on tomorrow and everything.
	I announced it that morning.
	The very last minute they canceled.
	I had had the interview set up because I had previously interviewed The head of the California Children's Health Defense.
	And I forget what her first name was now because it's been a couple of years ago.
	But she was with the Oscar Mayer.
	She was an heiress of the Oscar Mayer fortune.
	And she was working with Children's Health Defense out in California.
	And we talked about, I guess it was probably Maybe it's 2021 or something.
	Because we talked about what was breaking then was the difference.
	Why they were authorizing Cora Minotti and how it was legally distinct and the games that they were playing so they could get legal immunity and still say, well, we can now force you to take this because it's been approved, quote unquote, approved.
	We couldn't force people to take it when it was an emergency use authorization, but they didn't want to technically have the thing that was here be formally approved because then that would completely, they played these semantic games, these legal games, making it legally distinct.
	So they wouldn't lose the emergency use authorization liability protection.
	Anyway, we talked about that.
	It was good.
	We had a good rapport.
	And I said, can you get me an interview with him?
	When the book came out she said sure and so we had the interview was scheduled for a while and then the morning of it was cancelled and they did not want to reschedule.
	I was like okay I get it I've had that done to me many times you know people who Andrew Yang who was running to talk about universal basic income and Uh, he, uh, he canceled on me at the last minute, um, because he didn't want to talk to me about universal basic income.
	Um, so it's a pretty common thing to have happen with me.
	Uh, so I didn't really think much about it, but you know, whenever I see this, that he's going to talk to anyone at any time, that's a lie as well.
	Uh, he needs to come clean still about what he said about locking up his opponents.
	Like he ought to come out and say, I used to believe that, uh, we ought to, you know, purge people.
	If we disagreed with them to some degree, I was very passionate about this, but now that it's happened to me, I've changed my mind.
	You just do a mea culpa.
	Be honest with people instead, rather than admit that he lied about what he was saying at the time.
	He said, well, I was saying that we needed to put the corporations in jail.
	No, no, he did not say that.
	He was talking about the Koch brothers.
	So, you know, that's fine to change your mind.
	Just be honest about it.
	But the reality is, is that he's still a green radical.
	He's still a Democrat.
	He's still funny when it comes to being anti-war, as Gerald Cilenti found out.
	I didn't trust him.
	But he was saying all the stuff that Cilenti had said.
	And look, you know, if somebody's not run for office before and they're saying all the right things, I understand supporting them.
	But he's not anti-war, not about Israel, not really about Ukraine.
	His son was overfighting in Ukraine.
	So I really don't see those positions as being honest when it comes to vaccines.
	He's not anti-vaccine either.
	He's a limited hangout when it comes to that.
	He is not taking a principled stand.
	He's leaving a lot of room for compromise and wiggle, leaving the door open for all of those things.
	As I've said many times before, the GOP has become the Democrat party of my youth, and the Democrat party has become the Marxist party.
	As QDR writes, many former Democrats and liberals have switched over to the conservative party in the last decade, including Trump, right?
	Or so, as the calibration of the parties has shifted significantly, left-wing causes have become extraordinarily far left.
	And so you have the Democrats versus the Marxists.
	I mean, which Democrat would you like to vote for?
	Would you like to vote for Trump or for RFK Jr.?
	You know, Democrats all.
	This guy says, well, even former Democrat President Bill Clinton even went out of his way to balance the budget.
	Look, he got the credit for balancing the budget.
	Gingrich got all the blame, and I'm not a fan of Newt Gingrich either.
	I've got a lot of differences with Newt Gingrich over a lot of different issues.
	Matter of fact, he was a smart strategist, though, and he would say, well, if you've got 80% of the people who want this and only 20% of the people who want that, I think you want to be with this rather than that.
	And so if you look at his contract with America that got the big majority In the house, I ran the following time against Virginia Fox, who had come in with that group that came in with the Contract of America in 1994.
	She's still there 30 years later.
	And she didn't want to debate.
	She you know I was on a TV debate with a Democrat who I think that's such a heavily Republican district that Democrat only got like 20% even yeah, it was it was crazy So they were trying to do everything PBS was trying to do everything they could to help the Democrat and that included getting third-party candidates on and But You know when you look at what Gingrich was doing one of the things he wanted to do was to balance the budget Good, and he did it
	And he did it with cuts, and he was ripped up one side and down the other by the Democrats and the mainstream media at the time.
	I think it was Time Magazine, when people still paid attention to it, they had a cover of The Gingrich Who Stole Christmas.
	That was pretty funny.
	It stuck with me.
	But they blamed him for all of the cuts, and then when it got balanced, they gave all the credit to Bill Clinton.
	So he says, hey, you know, Bill Clinton even balanced the budget.
	Not exactly.
	An idea that's unconscionable for Democrats given today's spending addiction and policy stances on the fiscal state of the country.
	By the way, one of the other things in there was to have a line item veto for the president.
	And of course, Bill Clinton liked that.
	Being president, they want to have more power to strike out things that are there.
	And guess how that got struck down?
	I got struck down in the courts when Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York, pushed back against that.
	Yeah, Donald Trump's friend.
	Yeah, Rudy, 9-11 Rudy, you know, shortly after that, he was exposing people to dust that would kill them, many of them. So I could do a quick cover-up of what was left behind in terms of evidence at 9-11. That Rudy Giuliani, the same one who said we don't want to have a balanced budget, we don't want to have a line-item veto.
	That's where Trump's coming from.
	So he said, well we simply don't have a democratic process unfolding when it comes to selecting our next president.
	Of course we don't.
	It's always been an illusion.
	It's always been a distraction from the things that could really make a difference in your life.
	That's what I want people to understand.
	You can vote for whoever you want to.
	I'm not telling you who to vote for.
	I'm telling you the problems that I have with all these people.
	And if I agree with him, I'll tell you as well.
	You know, like I said, I've got a lot of problems with Newt Gingrich for things he did, but when I agree with him on some of these issues, I'll be happy to give him credit for those.
	But it really is an illusion, a distraction from what could be, where you could make a difference locally when you focus on these presidential races.
	And as a good example, of what has happened to the Democrat Party.
	I talked earlier this week when Phil Donahue died.
	I said, you know, here's an old-school liberal.
	They would support free speech, they would be anti-war, things like that.
	Not like these tyrants today.
	These people in the Democrat Party today are full-on Marxist.
	And I'm not using hyperbole here.
	That's exactly what they are.
	Don't call them woke.
	Now, Xi Van Fleet, who wrote Mao's America, A Survivor's Warning, said, she said, people have got to stop calling this stuff woke.
	She said, this is exactly what they're doing, this anti-racism, all the rest of the stuff.
	She said, these are the struggle sessions that they required us to have.
	Communist China. There wasn't any race issue involved there, but you had to denounce your privilege, you had to denounce yourself, and all the rest of the stuff. Humiliate yourself to the communist and the so-called common good.
	But the liberals used to be a lot different.
	As a matter of fact, there was a guy that I met back in 2016 when I was covering the DNC convention.
	He was also covering it for a media organization.
	And he was a listener.
	And so we kind of hung out together.
	We're taking breaks at the convention, and we've stayed in contact now since that time.
	And after I talked about Phil Donahue, he sent me a short clip of promoting a film that he was doing that Phil Donahue was executive producer.
	And I want you to see this, because it was really a good example of the anti-war aspect of what used to be the position of the left.
	As Thomas explains, the film's objective is to raise awareness on the conditions he and many others bear as to the personal cost of war.
	The more we show, the more people will know about what's going on and what can happen to somebody after they come back.
	Because the evening news doesn't really take the time to try to show the human cost of war.
	TV talk show legend Phil Donahue, executive producer of Body of War, elaborates on how he met Thomas.
	Well, I met Thomas Young at Walter Reed.
	And I just stared down at this bed.
	He was very whacked out, morphine, heavily medicated.
	And his mother, as I stood there, told me about his injury.
	He's a T4.
	So the bullet came, severed his spine, Between the shoulder blades.
	So Thomas is paralyzed from the nipples down.
	He's got his arms.
	He can't walk.
	He can't cough.
	He has bowel and bladder.
	28 years old today, prime of life.
	He has erectile dysfunction.
	He throws up every morning.
	His pills have pills to correct the side effects of the other pill.
	The director of the film is the award-winning Ellen Spiro.
	She explained how she developed her connection with Thomas over the course of the film.
	told stupid jokes and just talked and became friends.
	I don't believe in this idea of journalistic objectivity where you're separate from your subject.
	If you're a human being and you develop a human connection, then you feel for that person.
	And it's not like there's another side to that story.
	Thomas' story is Thomas' story.
	There is no other side.
	The Army's chief goal is to get you in, but once it comes time for you to get out, They don't really care if they take care of you or not.
	People do not see what we show in our film.
	There's no emotional connection here.
	I'm not saying Americans don't care, they do.
	Americans don't want anybody to die.
	But, you know, it's abstract.
	Oh dear, 4,000.
	See one of them.
	Just see one of them.
	Just go visit one family.
	And then tell me how you feel about this war.
	I speak for a man who gave for this land Took a bullet in the back for his pain Spilled his blood in the dirt and the dust And he's come back to say He's coming up from the ashes and he's becoming a voice, an anti-war voice in the culture and he's finding out who he is as a new person.
	I heard somebody once say that the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
	So just everybody keep together and stay strong and one day we'll get what we need to get done.
	As the troops return with the end of the Iraq war, Thomas and all who share his opinion continue to question his legitimacy and fight for the rights of veterans.
	Kvortashian, VOA News, Washington.
	Yeah, that's Kvortashian.
	And, you know, as you heard him interviewing them, first of all, a couple of observations.
	Phil Donahue was at Walter Reed Hospital.
	What was he doing there?
	Well, he was visiting the people that had been injured, unlike the politicians who love to send them there.
	Do they go hang out and see what happens after these wars to see if they think that it's even worth it?
	No, they don't care.
	And, you know, he did that just like Salenti, as I pointed out the other day.
	You know, Salenti was on all the big shows, big network shows and everything, talking about economics because he'd been very successful predicting trends.
	And when he opposed the war, that's it.
	They're not going to have him on anymore.
	And Phil Donahue opposed the war, lost his position there because he opposed the war.
	Memo was released, I talked about that the other day.
	And so what does he do?
	Well, he goes to visit people who are injured at Walter Reed and he's concerned about it, so he does this film, Body of War.
	Also, the director who was talking about it, Said, well this idea we got to separate ourselves from the subject that we got to be objective and all the rest of the stuff.
	I don't believe in objective media.
	I think people who say that are fooling themselves.
	And if they're not fooling themselves, they're fooling you.
	So let's forget about this stuff that's objective.
	I said this over and over again.
	Just take a look.
	A good example is Matt Drudge.
	He doesn't write anything.
	What he does is he chooses which stories he wants to put out there.
	He's like an editor, right?
	And you can have an incredible bias just as an editor without writing anything.
	What you choose to report on reflects your bias.
	And everybody's got a bias.
	You should be aware of that.
	As I've said many times when I was in college, I used to like to read across the political spectrum.
	I really didn't like the lukewarm mainstream publications like Newsweek and Time that pretended that they were objective.
	They were not objective.
	They were, you know, Operation Mockingbird, I was later to learn.
	But I like to the people who are, you know, on extreme conservative or extreme liberal or radical or whatever, who would look at the events and tell you what they thought and why they thought it.
	That's what I've always tried to do.
	There is no such thing as objective news.
	Tell people what you think and why you think it.
	But the idea that you're objective about that.
	So again, that's an example of the way the left was.
	You could disagree with them on economics and other things like that, but then you could find some areas of agreement.
	That's not the left today.
	The left today are totalitarian, censoring Marxists.
	The current Democrat Party says QDR is everything that former classic liberals used to fight against.
	And again, I think that he's thinking not of the classic liberals of the 1800s.
	They stole the name liberal during the Woodrow Wilson administration when The liberty movement essentially fractured over World War I. You had the anti-war people who were out there, and you had the people who were for World War I, but were also for economic freedom.
	And so you had this divide that for the longest time was roughly people who were about civil liberties, free speech, anti-war, things like that on one side, but they drifted over economically to socialism, economically.
	And then on the other side, you had the conservatives who were for free markets and things like that, but they drifted towards a kind of nationalistic pro-war fascism because of business interest.
	That was kind of the dichotomy that we had through most of the 20th century, but now it has completely changed in the political spectrum.
	And so he says the current Democrat Party is everything that the old liberals used to fight against.
	They have become the party of reckless spending, the party of encouraging war, the party of censoring speech and media that they don't like, and the party of authoritarian oversight.
	It's the power that has corrupted them.
	The power that they have to watch everything that we do with a surveillance state has turned the totalitarian left And to Orwellian dictators.
	On the economic side, the Democrat Party has simply become the party of socialism.
	And this always, of course, ends in communism.
	And again, this is something that the last couple of days, people have discovered that Kamilah Harris, her father is an economics professor.
	And her father, just like Booty Gay's father, both of them professors, both of them communists.
	Here's what her economics professor was writing about.
	Donald Harris, Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution.
	What he means is redistribution.
	And of course she supports reparations, but of course she supports all kinds, all forms of income redistribution.
	Communism.
	And when you look at Buttigieg, his father's life's work was about the founder of the Italian Communist Party, Antonio Gramsci.
	And you say, well, what difference does that make to us in America, the Italian communists or whatever?
	No.
	Gramsci was the person who said, we're not going to have a violent revolution like the French Revolution or the Russian Revolution.
	What we're going to do in America is we're going to have a communist revolution by marching through the institutions.
	And so we're going to take over big corporations.
	And make them oriented towards Marxism, which we see.
	Educational institutions, the government, etc.
	Hollywood.
	Let's march through all these different institutions.
	That tactic, that strategy, is what has worked.
	Everybody looks around and says, well, why is it that all the companies and all these institutions have been taken over?
	Well, that was a deliberate strategy.
	And it was a strategy that was celebrated and pushed forward By Boudiguet's father.
	And then Lala Harris's economics professor dad was a Marxist professor.
	So we have full-on Marxists and then for Republicans we've got a Kennedy and a New York Democrat friend of Jeffrey Epstein.
	Trump.
	It's unfathomable to me, says QDR, that a presidential candidate wants to make raising taxes further and price controls part of their fiscal policy.
	Well, what do you think this bipartisan agreement to make the IRS seven times bigger is for?
	If it's not to raise taxes and to squeeze us for every last penny.
	That's precisely why they did that.
	And it was bipartisan!
	That actually even got worse.
	Kevin McCarthy pulled back a little bit, said, well, let's not make it seven times bigger.
	Let's make it only five times bigger.
	I said, what?
	This is what we get.
	The difference between the Democrats and Republicans is a seven times bigger IRS versus a five times bigger IRS.
	And then when they pushed out Kevin McCarthy and they put in this Bible thumping conservative, Mike Johnson, he goes back to the seven times bigger.
	What about thou shalt not steal, Mike?
	Do you ever read that?
	Uh, that's, that's what we, there's not any difference, not any difference between them.
	What we found four years ago was that Trump is a globalist wolf and populist sheep clothing.
	I hope you saw the zipper.
	I've been trying to show everybody the zipper on Trump for the wolf's clothing for a long time.
	It was pretty obvious, actually.
	Even more obvious than the zippers on the costumes of the monkeys in 2001 at the beginning of that movie.
	By withdrawing from the race and putting his support behind President Trump, RFK Jr.
	could easily help sway crucial votes that could help the nation return power to the people and away from the political elites who wield it.
	Yeah, you believe that?
	Or, the other thing that could happen is that the 5% of the people, if the polls are correct, Roughly 5% of the people that are now behind RFK Jr.
	just may walk away and not vote at all.
	Why do you think they were supporting RFK Jr.?
	Had they seen the zippers on Trump?
	Well, maybe they'll see the zippers on RFK.
	Again, you know, we need to start building things from the ground up.
	And that's why I think, you know what, What Dr. Shiva is doing in terms of trying to get people to focus on that, you know, I think that's an important thing.
	And I think it's an important thing if you look at, you want another protest vote or whatever, look at the Constitution Party if they're there.
	That's a protest vote against this cult of death that the Democrat Party has become.
	RFK Jr.
	It's going to endorse Trump on Friday morning, everyone is saying, and of course we know that.
	You know, even a billionaire as his running mate, Nicole Shanahan, doesn't really matter when so much money is being used to buy favors in Washington.
	This is just a pageant, but it's really more than that.
	It's how these people get rich.
	How do you have somebody like Obama who's a communist organizer?
	Oh, community organizer, right?
	No, he's a communist organizer.
	How do you get somebody who's never had a job that really paid anything until he got into a political office?
	And those jobs didn't pay that much.
	But now he's like a billionaire.
	How did he get all that stuff?
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, you know, it is an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	And when you look at what Lala Harris got just this first month, a half a billion dollars.
	That's more than he can get, I think, from Shanahan.
	RFK Jr.
	can get from Shanahan.
	I mean, she's she got a billion dollars when she divorced the co-founder of Google, Sergey Brin.
	But that'd be half of her fortune.
	I don't think she's going to pour half of her fortune into it.
	And quite frankly, I don't think this is anything new.
	I think this is something when we saw that phone call and it seems like RFK Jr's son released that and it made RFK Jr upset.
	He apologized.
	He, you know, criticized his son for doing that.
	His son probably realized at that point when Trump is talking to him and Trump says, this is be really good for you if you join with me, you know, that type of thing.
	And he could hear that on the phone.
	And so he recorded it with his phone and then put it out.
	And it was probably at that point that the deal was made.
	And I suspect that's why his son put it out because he felt that his dad had caved.
	His son, like probably most of the RFK Jr.
	supporters I would think, is so disgusted with Trump that they would not vote for him, even if RFK Jr.
	endorses him.
	J.D.
	Vance said, look at our argument to RFK Jr., and I'll make it right now, because of course he hasn't dropped out yet.
	My argument is, look, if you want a Democrat party that has protected American workers and stood for strong borders, maybe disagreed with Republicans on things like tax policy, he said, that party doesn't exist anymore.
	Well, you know what?
	Neither does the low tax, America first, pro-life, pro-liberty, pro-constitution GOP.
	That party doesn't exist anymore either, except in your imagination.
	They want you to imagine that.
	They want you to imagine that all of your angst and your money and your efforts for the presidency are going to matter one way or the other, and they're not.
	They just want to distract you from what's real.
	RFK Jr.
	again is going to drop out tomorrow, I believe.
	The Kennedy campaign announced they'll hold an event in Phoenix on Friday morning.
	Trump, meanwhile, is also set to host an event on Friday night in Glendale, which is a suburb of Phoenix.
	So that's what you can expect to see.
	He'll say, I'm out, I'm endorsing Trump, and then he'll get to share the stage with him on Friday night, tomorrow night.
	So again, it is all.
	A reality TV show.
	Why did they wait?
	Why did they wait?
	Why didn't he just do it when the phone call was made?
	They're gonna wait till Friday.
	Friday's not even a good news day to release stuff.
	Because people start to fall off on Fridays.
	And so a lot of times you'll see, especially in the afternoon and evening of Friday, they'll release news that they really don't want to have a lot of attention for.
	The government will.
	They know how to control that.
	But they're going to do this on Friday because they're going to wait until the last hurrah at the Democrat convention.
	The Democrat Convention is soaking up all the media.
	I mean, Trump hasn't just been setting it out.
	He's been going around making trips and holding rallies and everything, but getting virtually no coverage except in the Trump media.
	All the coverage has been focused on DNC, and it's all been fawning coverage.
	If you want to throw up, just take a look at the Drudge Report.
	It makes me sick to see it.
	But you have to look at it.
	I mean, it's just as part of the job.
	Um, this, uh, you know, all the hagiography stuff about coach and all the rest of the stuff is like, Oh, give me a break.
	But, um, uh, they are sucking up all of the, uh, of the press cycles and everything.
	So they're going to wait till all this stuff is done.
	And then they just put their campaign essentially on pause knowing that they're not going to get any coverage.
	And so they're going to try to revive it and hit it big, uh, for the weekend after this stops.
	And so that's why they're going to do this.
	I mean, it's all, it's all pretty obvious if you stop and think about it.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We're going to be right back.
	I'm going to be right back.
	I'm going to be right back.
	Move.
	you you And now, The David Nutt Show.
	Let's talk a little bit about pharma.
	Big pharma.
	You know, these people.
	Trump wants to get rid of the pharmaceutical lobbyist or something.
	They've got this revolving door.
	It's like, yeah, you mean like everybody in your administration?
	From the head of HHS on down to your two FDA chiefs who both went to, one of them went back to Pfizer, the other one goes to Moderna.
	Give me a break.
	But let's talk about ivermectin, for example, because I had not seen this, even though this has been floating around for a while.
	I can look at it.
	People have been talking about ivermectin.
	Maybe there's a side effect of ivermectin.
	And especially because Dr. Michael Yadin, who I really have a lot of respect for, I respect his medical judgment, but especially his integrity, he could be wrong about this.
	And that's what this article is about, Expose News.
	As I said, Dr. Mike Yadin has vehemently stated publicly that ivermectin is one of the most violent fertility toxins he has ever come across.
	Well, that's pretty important, if that's the case.
	In response, Dr. Tess Laurie reviewed the first study included in the article that Dr. Yadin shared with her to see if it showed proof that ivermectin caused infertility.
	She says, it's now clear to many, including me, that the globalist agenda is one of eugenics, of course.
	It's eugenics, but it's also depopulation.
	She said, greatly reducing the world's population.
	That's what the climate MacGuffin's about, the pandemic MacGuffin, all of that.
	And then also about changing the genetics of those who remain.
	The possibility that Iver, and we're going to talk about the nanotech and the longer term plan of this, going back to 2015, the IEEE, the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
	The possibility that Ivermectin Through a potential effect on fertility may be part of the globalist dastardly genocidal plan is a fairly novel one that I'll explore here today.
	She said the notion that ivermectin may cause infertility has been floating around since 2021 based on decade old, mainly animal studies.
	After scanning such studies in 2021, I did not find the claim to be credible based on the supporting evidence.
	The animal studies being shared as proof, I found to involve very high doses of ivermectin, given for long periods, with a very short-term follow-up.
	Anything given in high doses, including overdosing on water, can cause harm.
	And I've made that point repeatedly when talking about fluoridation of water.
	A good example of this, one of the most famous examples was a gag on a radio program where they had some contestants and they were having them constantly drink water and they were doing other things, but they wouldn't let them go to the bathroom.
	And there was a woman who died from that, just having too much water.
	She was smaller than the other contestants.
	They were all drinking the same amount of water.
	Then she died from that.
	And so yeah, even water can kill you if you overdose on it.
	And so I would always say that about fluoride.
	There's a lot of studies that show that it is correlated, highly correlated, to a decrease in IQ.
	Harvard has done studies about that and others.
	But I said, how do you justify, regardless of, you want to defend fluoride?
	Well, how can you defend medicating people through the water supply?
	Because you can't control the dosage.
	And why would you give the same dosage to a baby that you give to an adult man?
	And yet we had with the vaccines, when you look at the different lots of the mRNA crump shots, they were all over the place in terms of dosage.
	From the lowest to the highest dose was a difference of 33 times.
	And the people who got that highest dose, those are the ones in those lot numbers, again, You're just, you're playing by lot.
	You're drawing lots, if you will, or playing Russian roulette.
	And the people who got the most concentrated lots, that's where you had the concentration of all the immediate deaths and immediately had issues with that.
	But she said back in 2021, which I didn't see this assertion about ivermectin back in 2021.
	If I had, I would have reported it.
	I never reported about concerns about ivermectin and fertility.
	I had not seen those studies.
	Back in 2021, when this assertion was doing the rounds on social media, it felt, to me, to be more like a distraction, as it does now, she said.
	However, due to repeated public engagement on this topic by Dr. Mike Yadin, I have decided to revisit it.
	Yadin, an ex-drug company executive turned truther, has vehemently stated one of the most violent fertility toxins he has ever come across.
	She says, I'm a little surprised by Yadin's certainty on this matter.
	However, since his area of interest in drug development was primarily in respiratory anti-allergy and inflammation drugs, I expect he knows a lot about Ivermectin, which is known to be an excellent, low-cost, anti-inflammatory, and immune-modulating old medicine.
	If the globalists are secretly pro-Ivermectin, and if they are delighted that this widespread use for worms and other infections, inflammation, and for cancer will continue to genocide, then why are all the doctors who use Ivermectin being censored and losing their licenses, she says?
	Why aren't we being embraced into the globalist fold and showered with money from Gates and with media coverage?
	So she said, I've just taken a look at the first study on the list that was shared with me by Dr. Yadin.
	She said it's a 2015 Iranian study that was conducted on rabbits.
	She said if the equivalent amount of dosage that was given to the rabbits were to be conducted in human subjects, She said it would be equivalent to a daily dose of 240 milligrams per day for 56 days, which would be 20 of the 12 milligram tablets a day.
	She said, you know, they sell these things and got a picture of it in the article.
	Um, see if you can pull that up.
	Um, yeah, right there.
	Um, they sell these things in strips of 10.
	So it'd be like taking two of those strips for essentially two months is what you're talking about.
	So she said, you know, they looked at the rabbits, the first batch, they killed them, looked at their various organs, liver, kidneys, and lungs.
	The second batch, they treated the same way.
	And then they mated them with fertile male rabbits over a period of two months.
	Most of the rabbits receiving the ivermectin did not have offspring during those two months.
	So, she said, the question is then, what can we deduce from this?
	Well, did these female rabbits remain infertile once the ivermectin cleared their system?
	We don't know.
	On the second mating, There were more offspring than the first, so at time, it is quite likely that fertility might have returned to normal over time, but they didn't run the test for very long.
	She said, would giving a human female 20 of these tablets a day for 56 days, would it similarly impact fertility?
	Quite possibly.
	Would it be reversible?
	She says, quite possibly.
	We just don't know.
	Because no scientist is likely to do such a study on human beings, because it would be pointless and dangerous.
	She said, can we deduce from the study that ivermectin is an effective eugenics tool for the global steep population agenda?
	No, I don't think so, she said.
	In addition, the fact that such a high total dose did not kill the little rabbits seems to prove what the databases testify to, which is that it is safe.
	Do I think the globalists might try to use ivermectin as part of their depopulation agenda?
	Yes, I do.
	It's clear that the globalists want to get access to our bodies to inject stuff.
	It occurred to me as far back as 2021, they might well be planning an ivermectin injection to be rolled out in due course, and we'll see these being developed by the usual suspects.
	The ivermectin injection deployed by these sociopaths would most likely contain the same kind of harmful nanotech and mRNA biology with liquid nanoparticles and assorted other toxic ingredients.
	But again, that's her conclusion.
	So this is something that's going back and forth.
	I thought it was important to talk about it, just as we mentioned people saying that they've had success in terms of treating cancer with ivermectin.
	So we'll pass that on.
	You make your own determination about that.
	But I just want to visit again what we are seeing more and more of, various studies showing nanotech in the mRNA vaccines.
	And so in this particular one, and this is, I talked about this the other day, this is, this most recent article is from Wine Press News, a new detailed study from Japan.
	Showing certain batches of mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna.
	I already covered this, but I wanted to cover it a little bit more in detail and show you some of the pictures that were there.
	And again, I always, you know, people were talking about nanotech stuff and interaction with magnets and stuff very, very early on.
	I didn't feel like there was enough evidence to make that credible.
	However, after people had been talking about that, if you remember, we had in Japan, and that may be one of the reasons why they're doing this study in Japan, the Japanese government got rid of 1.2 million doses because they said they started having black particulates.
	So they had these things sitting there.
	Maybe they didn't have them properly refrigerated.
	And they started noticing black precipitates coming out of it, and they said that they interacted with magnets.
	It's like, whoa, and they threw those away.
	Now that's hard data right there.
	Our data.
	And then I believe they did it a second time with about a million batches.
	It happened, I think, twice.
	I don't think it was the same report put out twice.
	But I think they got rid of about two million all told in two different batches that had that.
	And I had said from the very beginning, why is it that they're keeping these vaccines at such a very, very, very low temperature?
	And I thought that was suspicious.
	And so perhaps maybe that was what happened with it.
	Maybe it was not refrigerated properly.
	Maybe these things started to activate.
	I mean, you keep this stuff super, super cold.
	I mean, it was, you know, they were packing this with like dry ice or something.
	And the I would imagine that as they thaw this stuff out, That, and I talked about that in August of 2020.
	They're already talking about what they were going to do to put it out.
	They were giving instructions to people about how to track who had it, how to track the lot numbers and all the rest of this stuff.
	And they were talking about the fact that they had six doses of this per vial and you had to thaw it out and you had to use it within a certain period of time.
	What's going on with that?
	What happens if it goes beyond that?
	There was no word.
	I thought, that's kind of interesting.
	They don't say what happens if this is left at room temperature for too long.
	And maybe it was to keep people from seeing what happens when you warm it up, when you inject it into a body.
	Observable real-time injuries at the cellular level and recipients of the injectables are documented here for the first time with a presentation of a comprehensive description and an analysis of observed phenomena.
	They said, as I reported before, visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100 micrometers or greater of many different shapes.
	There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth.
	Here's some pictures of some of those.
	And as time progressed during incubation, simple one- and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size, developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three dimensions.
	They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent thin flat membranes and others as three-dimensional spirals and beaded chains.
	And so when you look at these, there's another picture of the different things that they saw under a microscope.
	And then in one of these experiments, and again this is something I had not talked about previously, They under 200 times magnification, they had semen with normal saline as a control added after two hours.
	And then they also put in a flu vaccine added as control after one and a half hours.
	It showed the sperm cells with intact morphology and with typical progressive natural reduction in sperm motility.
	But then they did it with the Pfizer injectables.
	And after one hour, all sperm motility ceased.
	They're dead.
	Moderna, same thing.
	After one hour of adding the Moderna to the sperm cells, they were all completely immotile.
	And then they did it with Novavax, because these are the three vaccines that are approved in the U.S.
	And one hour after Novavax, all motility ceased.
	That's the one that Dr. Peter McCullough thinks is great.
	Yeah, Novavax, try that.
	And so, again, they found various coils, ribbons, spirals in the Pfizer, distilled water, same thing with the Moderna, beaded chains, assorted structures, and distilled water as these things start to come together.
	And then they exposed them to magnetic fields that were not all that strong from things like a hard disk drive or a power brick that you would use for your cell phone or something like that.
	And I started reorganizing them into different geometries.
	As a matter of fact, here's another picture of the spirals and the other things that they were not injected, but they started assembling and appearing sometime after they had them at room temperature.
	Again, this is done in Japan.
	Where they had to throw away millions of these vials because they saw dark particulates there that interacted with magnets.
	I'm sure the same thing happened elsewhere, but the governments didn't want to talk about it.
	And so Wine Press News says you had hundreds of millions ran off to get these shots and now their DNA and cells have been hacked.
	Every organ and blood polluted with self-assembling nanotech.
	And I've yet to see any real ways to get rid of this stuff out of your body.
	That's why hopefully you didn't take them to begin with.
	And why I was emphatically warning others not to do so right from the get-go, he said.
	Me too.
	Me too.
	We could all smell a rat if you knew anything about how these pharmaceutical companies work, how the media works, how the government works, if you knew the background of DARPA and BARDA and all the rest of these.
	None more so than the, he said, you've got a lot of people who are pushing this, none more so than losers and liars and a lot of religious organizations.
	And that's very true.
	It was sad to see people like Franklin Graham.
	I think Franklin Graham just didn't have any discernment.
	He got pericarditis.
	He got one of the real vaccines, and it did the heart disease to him.
	And then you got people like Al Mohler, who was president of one of the biggest Southern Baptist theological seminaries.
	Southern Baptist Theological Seminary was the title of it.
	And he just Parroted verbatim.
	This is a guy who's not only is he the president of a seminary, college, or whatever, but he's also got a podcast where he talks about current events and news and he's absolutely clueless.
	Or he just decided that he was going to push this stuff along because what he did was he quoted verbatim from all of the calculated deceiving lies that had been even tested by Yale.
	And in July of 2020, I remember, you know, I talked about this in depth.
	There's about a dozen different lies that they were going to try to manipulate people with, and Yale had actually even done like a controlled experiment.
	You know, they had one group that was not told a lie, and then another group that was told one of these dozen lies, and they evaluated each one of the lies in terms of its efficacy.
	And I said, you know, there is no science in this except for behavioral science, and nothing has been tested except for their lies.
	And they went to a great deal of trouble to see, well, is it telling people that they're going to feel really bad if they don't get the shot and one of their family members gets it because maybe they gave it to them and maybe they wouldn't have transmitted it to them if they'd had the vaccine?
	All of those lies stacked one on top of the other.
	The lie that, you know, you're not going to transmit it if you get the vaccine.
	Oh, that, you know, that's been proven to be a lie, but we knew it was a lie anyway.
	And, you know, it was the kind of thing, well, you know, you should thank God for science.
	Because this is a moonshot.
	I mean, that was verbatim what they had in the Yale study, and it was verbatim what Al Mohler told people.
	It's like a moonshot.
	And on and on.
	You should do this to love your neighbor.
	That was the favorite lie of these people that are looked up to within the church.
	And there's others, like Robert Jeffries, the first Baptist Dallas.
	This guy is always at the side of Trump, just like Paula White.
	And Robert Jeffries joined with Curtis Chang.
	That guy was...
	He graduated from Yale, not Yale, Duke rather, and with a theology degree.
	I don't know if he's ever pastored a church, but he got lots of money from the Ad Council.
	You know, Trump gave the Ad Council 250 million dollars, more than they've ever had for any campaign, more than they ever had for only you can prevent forest fires, or this is your brain on drugs, or just say no, or any of this stuff, right?
	We've been hectored with all this garbage.
	At our expense from the Ad Council for years, and yet Trump gave this money to people like Curtis Chang.
	He set up websites, he had people come on with him, and he did a lot of work with Robert Jeffries.
	And they targeted church leaders and pastors to tell them, this is what you tell your people.
	It was insidious.
	It was disgusting.
	Still makes me really angry.
	Makes me really angry just like this.
	I'd rather admitting that the new forced inoculations coming next year will actually maim and kill a lot of people because Bill Gates knows he can't hide it.
	That's why Trump is taking control of the process saying he's going to have an early vaccine from a company that doesn't make one that is so dangerous or that doesn't change our DNA.
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing, but I understand what he's doing.
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
	Gates goes, trust my vaccine, but don't trust the CDC's vaccine.
	And then I went and looked up the ones that Trump's looking at.
	They're very weak, attenuated, classic viruses with a very low amount of adjuvant in it.
	And what is adjuvant?
	It makes your body have an autoimmune response.
	The squalene or the mercury or the aluminum to trigger that.
	And so, yeah, Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks.
	Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, you know, microwaved or radiated COVID deal?
	Absolutely.
	Yeah.
	He saw that, uh, that article he pulled up was from September of 2020.
	So, um, it was the September, October when he's telling people that.
	So yeah, the people who are telling us to trust Trump, trust the science, and trust Alex, all the rest of this stuff.
	Rumble, North American house hippo, thank you very much for the tip, I appreciate that.
	Trump's true believers constantly celebrate how he's anti-war.
	Didn't start any new wars, won't start any more wars, if that's the case, how are we supposed to get there war with Iran?
	Yeah.
	Well, the other thing is he didn't stop any wars either.
	He criticizes, and rightfully so, Biden for the way they, you know, the fire drill of getting out of Afghanistan.
	Maybe if Trump had gotten us out of there within the four years that he was there, but they weren't about to do that.
	They didn't voluntarily leave.
	They were thrown out.
	It wasn't a fire drill exit.
	They were thrown out.
	They didn't have any intention of ever leaving.
	They were there to grow, to supply opioids.
	out of Afghanistan.
	That and having access to the lithium that was there.
	That's why they were there.
	They had no intention of ever leaving.
	Well, back to the nanotech.
	This is an article from Technocracy News and actually it references a An article from 2015 from the IEEE, which is the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
	That's kind of the trade publication of W's Electrical Engineers.
	I haven't looked at it for 40 years, I guess.
	I used to read it all the time.
	Anyway, he points out, you know, they've talked for the longest time about the Internet of Things.
	And again, this IEEE article is 2015.
	articles 2015 and 2011-2012 I think it was 2012 you had David Petraeus who was then the director of the CIA and he made the statement that we're going to be listening to you with your smart refrigerator.
	We're going to have the ability to hear what you're doing.
	And we reported that, and everybody said, you're a bunch of conspiracy theorists.
	It's like, no, that's his conspiracy.
	And it's not a theory.
	He's talking about how they're going to do that.
	Well, they call that the Internet of Things, and that is very concerning as well.
	It's one of the reasons why they need to have 5G, is to connect all of these things that are out there, and the things include not just your appliances, your smart home, your smart car, your smartphone, and use that to really kind of keep track of you.
	They actually even talk about the Internet of Bodies and the Internet of Everything.
	But Big Pharma, the military, are talking about the internet of bio-nano things.
	Bio-nano things.
	And as Technocracy News says, you're actually getting the internet of Universal Skynet.
	So this paper goes back to March of 2015.
	The Internet of Bio-Nano-Things is the final building block of the surveillance network, bridging all living things from the biochemical domain into the electrical domain of the Internet.
	So, the abstract from the IEEE paper 2015 says, the Internet of Things has become an important research topic in the last decade, where things refers to interconnected machines and objects with embedded computing capabilities employed to extend the Internet to many application domains.
	While research and development continue for general IoT devices, and again, we call these things smart, you know, smart devices for stupid people.
	But actually, it's an acronym that's been used many times.
	Self-monitoring and reporting technology.
	There are many application domains where very tiny, concealable, non-intrusive things are needed.
	And they capitalize the things.
	You know, the thing, as Biden would say.
	Well, you better know the thing.
	Think about that.
	This is the IEEE.
	I mean, this is a this is a tech publication.
	Where they, when I read it 40-50 years ago, they used to, as always, about, you know, electronics and stuff like that.
	Now they're talking about how they can wield this technology to spy on people.
	They say, concealable and non-intrusive, things with a capital T.
	Oh, we got trouble right here in River City, right?
	The, with a capital T, the properties of recently studied nanomaterials, such as graphene, have inspired the concept of Internet of Nano Things.
	Notice the graphene?
	The graphene.
	Despite being an enabler for many applications, the artificial nature of the Internet of Nano Things devices can be detrimental If the deployment of the nano-things could result in unwanted effects of health or pollution, the novel paradigm of the internet of bio-nano-things is introduced in this paper by stemming from synthetic biology and nanotechnology tools that allow the engineering of biological embedded computing devices.
	I think that's what we're looking at with this mRNA stuff.
	The Internet of Biological Nano-Things stands as a paradigm-shifting concept for communication and network engineering.
	The Internet of Things defines a cyber-physical paradigm where all types of real-world physical elements, sensors, actuators, personal electronic devices, or home appliances, among others, are connected.
	So now they want to connect you in with that.
	A novel research direction in the engineering of nanoscale devices and systems is being pursued in the field of biology by combining nanotechnology with tools from synthetic biology.
	To control, reuse, modify, and re-engineer biological cells.
	Yeah, we're gonna hijack your body.
	That was what they were talking about from the very beginning, Moderna.
	You know, Pfizer jumped in with this technology, but Moderna had been working with it for 10 years.
	And they'd been making money on the stock market by giving people happy stories about some miracle cure that they had for this or that.
	But nothing had ever panned out until Trump and Fauci.
	And then they bring Pfizer in.
	By the way, they talked about it from the very beginning.
	I said, well, this should be a dead stop for you.
	When they come around and remember the meeting that Trump set up and everybody, how long is it going to take you?
	Well, we can do it in a year or two.
	That's too long.
	How about you?
	Well, yeah, maybe we can do it in a little bit less time.
	They give a time and he goes around the table and he's already got everybody there in decreasing order for your benefit.
	You know, again, it was a pageant.
	It was a show just like the entire political process.
	And the last ones he gets to are Moderna and they said, well, we can do it right now.
	And what we're going to do is we're not going to manufacture the vaccine.
	Your body is going to manufacture the vaccine.
	We're going to reprogram your body to manufacture the vaccine.
	It's like, okay, I'm out of this.
	Uh, stop right there.
	That's a non-starter should be a non-starter.
	That should have been your clue right there.
	They're going to reprogram your body to produce this stuff.
	I said, and how are they going to turn it off?
	And of course that is also a question.
	What is, um, what is this thing doing?
	A novel research direction in the engineering of nanoscale devices and systems is being pursued in the field of biology.
	Combining nanotech with tools from synthetic biology to control, reuse, modify, and re-engineer biological cells.
	That's what they're doing.
	Re-engineering the biological cells.
	A cell can be effectively utilized as a substrate to realize a so-called bio nano thing.
	The execution of DNA-based instructions, the biochemical processing of data, the transformation of chemical energy, and the exchange of information through the transmission and reception of molecules, termed molecular communication, are at the basis of a plethora of applications that will be enabled by the Internet of Bio-Nanotech.
	You know, when we look at this, when you look at DNA and they're talking about DNA based instructions, DNA is a very, very complicated code.
	It's got error correction, all the rest of this stuff.
	It is a sign of intelligent design.
	As a matter of fact, Dr. Werner von... I can't remember the guy's name.
	Werner Witt, I think is his name.
	And he did a book that was called, in the beginning there was information.
	And what he's saying is that the DNA, of course, is one of the best examples we've got of intelligent design.
	And the discoverers of it, Crick and Watson, said, well, yes, of course, it shows that we are designed.
	But it can't be the God.
	It can't be God.
	It can't be the God of the Bible.
	So we're going to pretend that it's some, we'll call it panspermia.
	Some intelligent aliens came here and engineered us and then flew away again.
	But it was always a computer code.
	And so you hear the people here, you've got people at the IEEE looking at this and saying, how can we reprogram this computer code, right?
	When you look at the GRAIN acronym, genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, and nanotech, as I said before, we can see the danger and we can see what is happening with robotics and artificial intelligence.
	But in terms of genetics and nanotech, it's very difficult to observe what they're doing.
	And it's almost impossible to imagine what they are doing.
	I mean, it truly is beyond the public's imagination to imagine what is happening with nanotech.
	Biological cells as the substrates of bio-nano things.
	And then they break it down in the IEEE.
	Again, this sounds very much like a computer device, right?
	They're going to hack your body, the DNA computer code that is there, and all the rest of the stuff to do these types of things.
	And so they said, well, we have some examples of how we're going to have complex biochemical reactions.
	We can have a control unit that contains embedded software of the device.
	This will correspond to the genetic instructions densely packed into the cell's DNA.
	So that's a control unit.
	We'll have a memory unit.
	That'll kind of be the interior of the cell comprised of molecules synthesized by the cells result of DNA instructions.
	A processing unit, that'll correspond to the molecular machinery that from the DNA molecules through the so-called transcription and translation, that's what the mRNA is doing, right?
	The processing unit generates protein molecules with instruction dependent types and concentrations.
	The processing unit, the mRNA.
	The power unit That'll be synthesized by the cell from energy supplied from the external environment in various forms and provides the energy necessary for the cell's biochemical reactions to take place.
	The transceivers, which will allow these systems to exchange information.
	That'll be the information-bearing molecules.
	Then finally, sensing and actuation.
	For example, light or mechanical stress.
	Or changing the chemical characteristics of the environment, mechanically interacting with it.
	Or electromagnetics, right?
	And so you look at the different elements here.
	I mean, they've got this thing broken down like some device that they would create.
	A control unit, a memory unit, a processing unit, a power unit, transceivers, sensing and actuation.
	This is ten years ago.
	And they said, although this is all still in its infancy, this technology has been successfully applied in 2015 for drug delivery, gene therapy, artificial blood cell production, and it is expected to deliver ideal substrates for synthetic biology with more predictable behavior.
	And so we will be able to, they said, randomly change parts of genetic programs And have these things selectively evolve?
	Well, they concluded, they said, that bio-nano things could be used to access the human body, either to steal personal health-related information, or even to create new diseases.
	Isn't it amazing how evil science has become?
	The Internet of Nano-Things proposes to push the limits of this concept to nanotechnology-enabled nanoscale devices, which can easily be concealed, implanted, and scattered in the environment.
	I mean, they're not just talking necessarily about injectables, putting it in the environment in general.
	We believe that the Internet of Bio-Nanotechnology research field, while still in its infancy in 2015, Will result in a game-changer technology for the society of tomorrow.
	There you go.
	Technocrats in charge of the IEEE, I guess.
	Vernor Gitt, thank you very much for looking that up.
	Yeah, Vernor Gitt, if you want to look it up.
	And that's W-E-R-M-E-R-G-I-T-T.
	A great book.
	He talks about how people who want to believe in evolution, it's like, no, what you have to have in the beginning is you have to have something that's going to organize and design everything.
	Organize and design everything.
	Otherwise, a tornado in a junkyard isn't going to build a building.
	It takes a designer.
	You look at something that is as complex as the body or any of the systems within the body.
	We have systems within systems within systems.
	Every single one of them has information in it.
	Now, 2,000 years ago, John and the other Christians described Christ as Logos, which is exactly what that means.
	It means information, purpose, design.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	I want to take a moment to thank our producers, I guess we should call them.
	I think it's a better description than donors, because it's really you who make this program possible.
	I'd already counted what we had pretty much in Zelle from the beginning of the month, but I had not recognized the people who had made the donations, and so I want to take a moment to read their first name and last initial.
	To thank them, because without them this program would not be here.
	Kevin M, Gregory I, Michael L, William D, Rogelio J, Manny D, Austin M, and Austin is one of several new people this month that we have not had as donators before on Zelle.
	So many of these people, you'll hear these names over and over again.
	They are very faithful supporters.
	Producers and many of them will donate multiple times a month and Austin sent a small donation and said testing Zelle and so We I think we got back to them or they saw that it was successful and then sent another one later in the month Gretchen see Maurice, that's one of our long-term supporters.
	Maurice W., Robert A., Terry M., Lois I., William R., Steven S., Jennifer J., Linda M., Kevin R., William R., Jeffrey C., Mary M., many of these long-term supporters and frequent supporters, Michael P., Jay H., yes, Chris T., Benjamin R., Yes, see?
	Benjamin there every month, a significant contributor.
	Gretchen C. again, Brian P., William R., Michael M., William R. again, Manny D., Mary M. again, Jeffrey C. again, Kenneth C., and David R. And we had, of those people, we had 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 that were new.
	So we do appreciate that.
	Actually, David R. sent a contribution and told me to cut the God grift.
	Well, it's not a grift, it's a gift.
	And I can't do that.
	I've already been paid and something higher than money to do what I do.
	But let's talk a little bit about that then.
	Let's talk about the censoring and firing of a National Guard officer because he voiced his Christian beliefs.
	You know, we look at the National Guard and we got Tim Walz who skips out before a rock.
	They drop his rink because he didn't complete what he needed to do in order to keep that rink.
	I guess he had to get out quickly.
	No time to finish that coursework or whatever.
	But he continues to inflate his rink.
	And he is honored by these people.
	This is in Idaho.
	The Idaho Army National Guard.
	Liberty Council has announced it's bringing a free speech fight demanding that the Idaho National Guard restore the career of an infantry officer who was removed from command and illegally pressured to resign because of a soldier's complaints.
	One soldier's complaints.
	Ended this guy's career.
	What did he complain about?
	He complained about this guy saying on social media what his personal Christian beliefs were.
	The statements were made, as the officer explained on his social media, his perspectives on gender ideology and on the sexualization of children.
	The officer argued against graphic and obscene children's books in a library.
	Are you for that?
	Oh, okay.
	Drag events in libraries and schools and said no child is born in the wrong body.
	He also objected to quote the medical mutilation of gender confused children.
	Me too.
	But the subordinate senior enlisted man complained about it.
	He said he felt threatened.
	He said these comments cause a hostile work environment.
	So I guess a friendly work environment would be supporting the medical mutilation.
	I mean, you don't want the army to have to deal with any hostile environments.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	What's he going to do when he gets into a war?
	Uh, when people are shooting at him, how's that going to make him feel?
	Or if they just use Tokyo Rose type of stuff, you American troops, why are you here?
	You know, that type of thing.
	I don't know.
	Uh, it can't handle it.
	Uh, I feel discriminated against.
	Oh, well, you know what?
	Moderation of content is no virtue.
	Sorry if your feelings are hurt, but that's what happens in a free society with free speech.
	People are going to have their feelings hurt.
	They're going to get angry.
	They're going to be offended.
	And, um, these people also don't care about whether or not this, uh, officer who was kicked out, how does he feel about that?
	Well, we really don't care about his feelings, right?
	It always just goes in one direction.
	He said, the purpose of this complaint is to bring to your attention several instances of which I believe I have faced discriminatory treatment based on my sexual orientation, based on defining himself by his sex, his sexual activity, his sexual desires.
	That's that defines this guy.
	This sum total of what he is.
	I am deeply concerned about the hostile prejudice behavior I've experienced, which is adversely affected my well-being.
	My work performance, my overall sense of belonging.
	Liberty Council's first intervention in the case has been to notify the governor of Idaho, Brad Little, of the free speech violations.
	Because again, the National Guard is technically under the governor until it is scarfed up by the Federal government in certain cases.
	In this instance, the Idaho Army National Guard, they said, has violated the First Amendment, violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, violated the Idaho Constitution, violated the free exercise of the Religious Protection Act.
	In addition, it has become evident this military branch seeks to implement a policy of discrimination against religious beliefs of enlisted personnel, says the legal team.
	They explained, as a Christian, the officer believes all people are made in God's image, have inherent dignity, and are worthy of respect.
	He is committed to serving those under his command, regardless of political or religious disagreements, and would give his life in defense of his state and nation.
	You see, even if this person's sexual content was his religion, and it is, they are discriminating on the basis of one religion versus another.
	The National Guard removed him from command because of the feelings of being offended expressed by the subordinate.
	Then officials pressured him to quit, and shortly after launched a formal investigation, quote, based on the unconstitutional complaint, said the lawyers defending him.
	It took a year, but that resulted in a recommendation that he be permanently barred from command.
	Further, the investigating officer revealed his perspective of enlisted personnel, quote, who hold traditional moral values, said they are extremists.
	So they had, it's not just this person who's making the complaint.
	They put an officer in charge of investigating it.
	And he said, people who hold traditional moral values, such as blah, blah, blah, blah, are extremists.
	Well, people who hold to the idea of free speech are also called extremists as well, aren't we?
	Liberty Council founder and chairman Matt Stavers said, Governor Brad Little must ensure that the Idaho Army National Guard uphold federal and state law and protect free speech of enlisted personnel.
	Well, good luck with that.
	I mean, Brad Little is a Republican.
	But he was one of the worst governors during the lockdown.
	I should call him Lockdown Little.
	Because, and he didn't lock down a little, he locked down a lot.
	Locked down everything.
	And he was one of the worst ones.
	And he had, again, Idaho, Republican governor, and Republican legislature majority.
	And when Brad little got all the Trump money and locked everybody down and closed all the businesses, the Republican legislature was not meeting that year.
	Kind of like what Texas that would meet every other year.
	And so they were going to call a special session.
	And, uh, as I started to call the special session.
	And Brad Little, the governor, came in and shut it down, as I said at the time, like some kind of colonial governor dismissing the legislature.
	What arrogance!
	He said, no, you're not going to meet.
	And then what he did was he came up with a series of measures that he wanted them to do, and it was essentially one of the most insidious coercive measures I saw any of the governors do.
	What he said, and after he wrote this, then he called the legislature into session and had them rubber stamp what he did.
	And here's what he did.
	He said, we're going to give immunity, legal immunity, to any business that follows all of our Simon Says superstitions.
	Gotta wear a mask, gotta stay six feet apart, gotta do this, can't have more than this many people in the building, and all the rest.
	All of that nonsense that we all know about, right?
	If you, as a business, follow all of that stuff, if somebody gets sick with the COVID cooties, then we will not let them sue you.
	However, if you don't follow each and every one of our little Simon Says superstitions, anybody can sue you, and you will be fully liable for everything.
	It was an open invitation for cranks like this guy who got his superior officer fired because of his Christian beliefs.
	It was an open invitation.
	For any of these COVID cranks to shut a business down forever, bankrupt them.
	That was what Republican Governor Brad Little did.
	So good luck with this thing.
	This guy doesn't support freedom of any way, shape, or form.
	On Rockfin, Andromeda One, David, you're a voice of reason.
	Well, thank you.
	I appreciate that.
	Thank you very much.
	And I thought this was very interesting.
	I saw this.
	This is something just came out.
	Tim Allen, you know, he is the guy who was for years before Disney went completely off the rails.
	They had home improvement.
	He was Tim, the tool man.
	They would never allow a show like that anymore.
	You know, it was too much making fun of masculinity, but not in a hateful way, right?
	So here's Tim, the tool man.
	Of course, he was also Buzz Lightyear with Toy Story.
	He was the voice of that.
	And he has now said he started reading the Bible.
	He had identified as publicly as a Christian, but he said, I just started reading the Bible.
	And he said, it is amazing.
	Yeah, you know, Tim, it is, it'll take you to infinity and beyond.
	That's all.
	On Tuesday, he used social media to profess his love of reading the Bible.
	Alan, who calls God the Builder, posted on X that he's taking time to read the Bible, amazed by what he finds there.
	As a matter of fact, in interviews, he has referred to God as the Builder.
	You know, like the builder of DNA, builder of everything, you know, intelligent design.
	Here's an interview from about seven years ago.
	But don't let the antics fool you.
	Alan is a thinking man's clown.
	He'd rather discuss quantum physics than box office numbers.
	Whether you're a true believer or a pagan.
	And he spends a lot of time working on that curious relationship with God.
	Or, as he says, the builder.
	Honey, don't say God in church.
	I always do ask, whoever put me here, the builder, what did you want me to do?
	Do you think people would be surprised to know how deeply religious or spiritual you are?
	Well, if you know me, you know it.
	I don't push it.
	I just want a relationship with whoever built me.
	This is too much, too weird that it happened by accident.
	It didn't happen by accident.
	I don't feel that it did.
	No, no, of course not.
	Again, do you look at a car and say, wow, that accidentally happened.
	I wonder if I can get one of those things to accidentally happen in my driveway.
	No, you ask who built it.
	What's the make of that, right?
	He said, never took the time in all my years to ever read and really read the Bible currently almost through the Jerusalem Bible Old Testament and almost done with the prophets.
	Next up to the New Testament so far, amazing and not at all what I was expecting.
	Doesn't it say something that, you know, people can identify as Christians and go to church for such a long time?
	Never read the Bible.
	It's amazing.
	He's previously addressed faith, most recently in 2022, when he said he fought to put Christ back into Christmas for the Disney Plus limited series, The Santa Clauses, where he reprised his role of Santa Claus from the original trilogy of movies.
	He said it originally had a lot of other worldly characters and ghosts and goblins.
	And I said, no, this is Christmas.
	It's about Christ.
	It's literally a religious holiday, he said.
	And you know, I understand some people look at Christmas, and I've had a lot of Christians who write me and say, you know, we don't celebrate Christmas and things like that.
	And I understand that.
	That's where my family was.
	But I looked at it and I thought, you know, it's a perfect opportunity to talk about Christ, to talk about the Incarnation.
	And so, in our family, we celebrated it, and we didn't shy away from that.
	As a matter of fact, we didn't just accept it as it was presented to us in this kind of syncretism of pagan culture and secular culture.
	myths and everything, but I would say to them, I'd say, well, you know, it probably wasn't this time of year.
	There's a lot of stuff about wise men and things like that, that are, that are added to it in terms of saying there's three of them and here's their names and things like there's a lot of elaboration.
	I think it's very important not to mix in, uh, false aspects or mythological aspects like Santa Claus.
	And so I would take the opportunity to talk to kids about what I believe was real, what the Bible said about it, and what I believe was pure fabrication that was added.
	Rudolph the reindeer and all the rest of this stuff.
	And just so that they know, you know, what we are celebrating in Whistler one year.
	Because I do it every year, you know, one year.
	Whistler says to me, he says, Dad, I know there's no Santa Claus.
	If there was a Santa Claus, it'd be in the Bible.
	So I thought that was an interesting take on it from Whistler.
	But as he's talking about this, he said, you know, I just, in the interview, he said he nearly lost his faith.
	He said he began to question God and faith after his father was fatally struck by a drunk driver when he was 11 years old.
	He said, for years, as a regular churchgoer, he admitted that he didn't like the idea of God, and he was constantly a cynic on matters of faith.
	But he ultimately came around, and eventually he began to see God as what he called the Builder.
	Again, he became, you know, started looking at intelligent design.
	As we know, you know, creation testifies to the fact that there is an intelligent designer.
	Day after day, night after night, It speaks without words.
	All of creation does.
	The question is, has God spoken to us through the Bible?
	And so he said, I always ask the builder, what do you want me to do, he said.
	And he said, and I do ask it, but you've got to be prepared for the answer.
	Well, you might want to, instead of just asking, you might want to read the long letters that he's written to us, which is what Tim Allen is doing right now.
	You know, for many people, religion is about doing, but Christians always called it the faith.
	Because it's not about your doing, it's about trusting what God has said that He has done.
	And while we're talking about this, I just wanted to play you what John Lennox, who is a mathematician in the UK, Irish mathematician, and he's been well known for his debates with a lot of atheists.
	He's debated Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins and many of them.
	And this is what John Lennox said about reading the Bible.
	Not only to my children, but to anybody.
	Our lives rush past.
	We've become fixated on digital equipment that's robbing us of time.
	People say to me they've no time.
	They've loads of time.
	If you want to know how much time you've got, just ask yourself a simple question.
	How much time have I spent in the last week fiddling with a piece of digital equipment and doing things that have no relevance whatsoever to my profession or my life?
	And then say, have I got any time?
	We're robbing ourselves of the most important thing in life if we're Christians, and that is seeking fellowship with God through His Word.
	You will never make any impact on this world by reading the Bible for five minutes before you jump into bed.
	And I'm brutally practical.
	You husbands will never make any impact on the world if you're not praying with your wives and leading your families spiritually.
	You just won't.
	It's not possible to develop a deep relationship within a family that is not triangular.
	That is, it doesn't include Jesus Christ at one corner.
	And we can seek to repent of these things and really begin to make time so that, in that sense, we get to know God.
	I used to think that science and all of these arguments were much more interesting than the Bible.
	And I discussed it with my mentor, David Gooding, and he said, would you like to do a Bible study?
	And he invited me to do one.
	One night transformed my life, completely, in Cambridge.
	Where I, for the very first time, I met a person that took Scripture seriously.
	And he entered a dialogue with Matthew.
	And it was just mind-blowing how he began to open the treasures of Scripture.
	But it takes input and work.
	Many of you people are professional.
	Think of the work you had to do to get to where you are.
	Now if God has given you that kind of mind, how much of it are you using on Him?
	And what worries me silly is people who rise in their professional career like that, but their knowledge of Scripture remains on a basic baby Sunday school level.
	So the moment their peers raise any questions, they instantly detect they've not thought it through.
	And that silences them, often forever sadly.
	So it's a clarion call, and I think it is a way of pushing against this tide of mediocrity where we don't take God's Word seriously.
	So what that tells me, when I find it in my own heart, is I don't really love God.
	All this talk about going to heaven and going to meet with Christ, if that happened to you now, what would you say to Him?
	What would you talk about?
	It is very serious stuff.
	C.S.
	Lewis says all the leaves of the New Testament rustle with an expectation of eternity.
	And have we never sensed that?
	The Word of God is given to us to make eternal things real.
	And we need to spend time immersed in it, perfectly reading it, with other people and alone.
	I had a very close friend at Cambridge.
	Years ago we agreed that whoever died first, the other remaining person would preach at the funeral.
	He thought I would die first because I was quite a bit older.
	But I'll never forget the day when he called me and with tears in his eyes he said, I've got a tumour as big as a grapefruit in here and that's going to be it.
	You have to take my funeral.
	I said to him, what shall I say?
	Without hesitation he said this.
	He said, tell them to do what we did as students in Cambridge.
	To pour over the Word of God prayerfully and wait on God until his face appears.
	And then they will have something to say.
	Do you want something to say?
	You're a pastor, teacher, Sunday school.
	If you want something to say, there is no shortcut.
	And I'll never forget those essentially last words to the world, and I've repeated them many times.
	That was what transformed me.
	It wasn't reading all the philosophy in the world, although I love it and find it interesting.
	And it's a way of building bridges and dealing with difficulties.
	But in the end, unless God is real through his word, we're missing the central fellowship that he offers us.
	Let's listen to it.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right.
	Welcome back.
	And joining us now is Tony Artiman of Wise Wolf Gold.
	And Tony has kindly set up davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you directly to him and let him know that you're coming through us.
	And of course you can buy gold and silver from Tony and you can small or large amounts.
	You can also set up a regular savings program to start buying gold and silver, or you can become part of the Wolf Pack.
	Pick an amount that you want to, he's got different levels there, you pick one of those levels and you save that much each month and he sends that directly to you and you get the advantage of a buying group.
	So he'll send that directly to you.
	I've got a lot of experience with Tony over the years, a great guy to deal with, I highly recommend him.
	And we're going to talk a little bit about economics and things that are happening from the government.
	And the outsized footprint of the government on us.
	Thanks for joining us, Tony.
	It's always great to be here, David.
	Thanks for having me.
	Yeah, economics or lack thereof.
	That's right.
	Call it economics, right?
	But well, of course, they pretend that modern monetary theory is economics, but it's not at all.
	And, you know, this is one of these things.
	It's kind of interesting to see.
	How much they lied to us last quarter about the jobs that were the new jobs that were created and zero hedge is really excited because they called the lie when it was first put out by the government back in March.
	They called it almost to the dot.
	They said they've over inflated this.
	By 800,000 jobs.
	And now here we are, a couple months later, as they're getting ready to release the new figures, they revise the previous quarter's figures, and they say, we over-reported that by 818,000.
	Zero H said, see, we told you, 800,000.
	We almost got it precisely, the amount.
	But they do this every quarter, don't they, Tony?
	They will always put out labor numbers that look better than they really are.
	In this particular case, this is the second Biggest revision in U.S.
	history.
	The other one happened in the midst of the Great Recession in 2009.
	So that tells us something as well.
	But they always put out these numbers that make everything look really good, and then the next quarter they revise those down to make this quarter's numbers look even better, as they're lying to us about this quarter's numbers as well.
	Well, that's right.
	They always do that.
	The Mockingbird Press is the same thing with headlines and then they get it wrong and then they'll bury it with a retraction.
	But these numbers support the fake markets.
	That's why they're used and abused like this and they throw these things out there.
	They'll use that to borrow against or put futures on something or short something else.
	So it's really, it's not even about the truth.
	Matter of fact, it always reminded me when I saw that report come out, Do you remember during the height of the Biden mandates for Operation Warp Speed when all these corporations were laying people off for not getting the jab?
	And they came out I think about two months later and said, look, millions of jobs have been created.
	And almost no one got the correlation.
	I thought, well, you're watching, you know, the same people that told these corporations, you got to lay these people off.
	This is mandatory.
	So they were laying people off and there was millions of job openings.
	They said, look at all the jobs we created.
	You fired people.
	And they used that, those statistics to show that they had a strong economy.
	That's how fake it is.
	Oh, it just, it never ends.
	As a matter of fact, it said, you know, back in 2009, it was just barely bigger than this line.
	Uh, there they said it was, um, 824,000 jobs that didn't exist and they had to walk it back.
	And they said this time it's 818,000.
	So it was almost exactly the same.
	And of course that was with Obama.
	And, um, you know, it was Obama who famously said, you know, we had this many jobs created or saved and everybody said, or saved.
	What does that mean?
	Can you measure the jobs that you saved?
	They're just making everything up, aren't they?
	It's all made up.
	All the numbers are made up.
	I mean, we're waiting for... I mean, it's really bizarre, David.
	If you boil it down, you know, the Fed, the Federal Reserve has such influence on our economy.
	We're all waiting to see what's going to happen with Jerome Powell at Jackson Hole.
	But if you really stop and think about it, take all the hype out of it.
	You're just waiting for a bankster to tell you when they're going to have more inflation.
	That's what the markets are cheering for.
	These three rate cuts that are supposed to be announced here at Jackson Hole and supposed to be, I think, October, November, December.
	rate cuts of 25 basis points but that what that is ladies and gentlemen that's inflation they're gonna create currency they're going to devalue your currency in the markets and the establishment are cheering that on.
	You're talking about how they manipulate the economy.
	That was one of the points of the Zero Hedge article.
	They said, well, how would the stock market be different today?
	If back in March, five months ago, they would have told you the truth about the jobs actually, a million less jobs created, the stock market would have been much different than it is right now.
	So that's one way they can manipulate it.
	I remember a friend of mine who, we had a party.
	at our house and he came over and his brother was visiting him and came and he introduced me to his brother and and who was a vice president at a bank which is typically the title that you've got if you're a branch manager they call you a vice president and he says so my brother is in banking he says you got it all wrong about the the Federal Reserve he says tell him because yeah the Federal Reserve doesn't do anything except clear checks I said, seriously?
	It doesn't manipulate the economy with the information that it puts out, or with the interest rates, or with quantitative easing?
	He didn't know any of that stuff.
	I mean, I didn't argue with him.
	It's just, oh, OK.
	Well, I guess I was wrong.
	It's so easy for them to manipulate the economy one way or the other.
	And that was some of the things that were being said by the senators who opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve back in 1913.
	Saying that it's going to be able to manipulate and create boom and bust cycles.
	It can put out false information.
	They can trade on that and make money.
	I mean, I wonder if Nancy Pelosi made some stock moves when the Federal Reserve was lying.
	But I'm sure that the people inside the Federal Reserve who knew better and the people inside the Department of Labor who knew better putting out these false job reports.
	I'm sure they all knew that.
	It's amazing how many people in the banking industry don't know about the origins of the Federal Reserve, what the Federal Reserve actually does and controls the money supply.
	I've had bank presidents do business with me, and usually they're just selling to me.
	They're not buying from me.
	That's another interesting thing.
	People in the establishment banking order, they're just getting rid of stuff.
	Like, oh, I got these silver dollars.
	This is something the bank's had for a while, or I got this gold that I inherited.
	They're getting rid of it.
	And then I'll say, what do you do?
	And this has happened to me more than once.
	And I'll start talking about this, about CBDC.
	They don't know about that.
	They don't know.
	They don't know about that.
	Well, they might know now it's, it's become more headline, but this has been over the last few years.
	I run into those people all the time.
	You were mentioning the nineties and Newt Gingrich earlier in the show.
	And it reminded me of conversations I had with, with my dad at the time, we were talking about the stock market right before the dot-com bust.
	And he started talking to me about how the stock market actually works and how his business would be compared to the stock market because he had convenience stores and real estate and did some banking.
	And he said, if my business was valued at a thousand times earnings, it'd be in the billions.
	So look, and he was telling me, he's like, look, this is how these businesses are measured on Wall Street.
	He's, I don't have nothing in stocks.
	So I've always learned from my dad, I don't, I don't get into the stock market.
	I don't buy paper.
	I invest in things that I can control and I can see.
	So I learned that lesson early on in these, you know, these statistics and all this stuff that comes out from labor.
	It's really irrelevant because so much of the business that goes on in Wall Street, it's hard to determine what is actually real.
	You're talking about, again, thousand times earnings for valuations.
	This is nuts.
	And they've been doing this for, and it's worse now.
	I think a lot of the companies in the 90s were a lot stronger, especially after the 08 debacle.
	you still have hundreds of zombie corporations, literal zombies that they should have died in 08, 09, but they're propped up because of all the financial infrastructure that flows through them for the banks that they chose to keep around, you know, the ones that were too big to fail.
	Not like Lehman, right?
	Lehman and some of the others who were on the chopping block and I think there was something I laughed about years ago, there was a people say, well, the banking industry is too big to fail.
	I go, well, some of them failed.
	I remember there was an old Washington Mutual that got turned into a chicken joint there in North Texas where I used to live.
	You know, it was Dodd-Frank, I think, or Barney Frank, the Dodd-Frank bill, but it was also Elizabeth Warren who got involved, and they created the Consumer Financial Protection Board.
	And after that, that made it even more difficult for the small and medium-sized banks.
	And I remember Drudge, before he went to the dark side, he was talking about Every year, you know, several hundred banks.
	He would, at the end of the year, he'd talk about how many banks and he'd link to an article about how many banks had gone out of business that year.
	Of course, not the big banks.
	It was all small and medium sized banks.
	And for the most part, they were regulated out of a lot of these businesses and then pushed into commercial real estate where they could make a loan.
	And now they're going to be slammed with that.
	It truly is amazing to see how this whole thing has rolled out.
	I thought it was also interesting.
	That Nicole Shanahan, you know, the running mate of RFK Jr., was talking about that this week, talking about how they fake every quarter, how they fake the labor statistics.
	But of course, everything is fake.
	I used to always use the labor jobs reports as another example of how the government lies to us when I was talking about all the COVID cases.
	I said, everything they tell you is a lie.
	You can't depend on any of it.
	And yet the stock market It's such a bubble, and so much of the bubble has been poured into these AI companies, the Magnificent Seven or whatever, especially around AI.
	You talk about something that is trading at unbelievable multiples of what it's actually worth.
	That is the big bubble right now.
	It's going to be the AI bubble.
	It's going to burst.
	Absolutely.
	It's all a bubble.
	What's so interesting is these headlines coming out about Jackson Hole, the rate cuts, what's happening with the markets.
	That's a distraction.
	The actual news is what's happening between countries like Saudi Arabia, China, Russia, Iran, what's happening in energy, Venezuela looking to join the BRICS or their financial networks.
	If you're paying attention, you see what happened to the petrodollar, which was not on the mainstream radar.
	It's approaching fast the downfall and decline, de-dollarization of the world's reserve currency, also known as the dollar.
	We're losing the petrodollar system.
	We lost the agreement and 80% of all the energy transactions that go on around the world when involved in crude oil are done in dollars.
	These countries are brokering deals right now for cross-border payments.
	Countries like China.
	Countries like Saudi Arabia.
	They're doing it now.
	Of course, Saudi Arabia joined BRICS.
	So, it's not going to be tomorrow.
	But that's the headline and what you should be paying attention to is not the rate cuts.
	And it's not it's definitely not the stock market in here in the U.S.
	It's not Wall Street.
	It's what's happening with our currency because all of that will get all those dollars will be repatriated.
	You know, the Chinese are selling off U.S.
	debt.
	They're buying gold.
	It's debatable how much gold the Chinese actually have.
	As a matter of fact, they're Their former province and maybe future province Taiwan, they just announced they're going to be doing a gold-backed currency with their gold reserve.
	They got about 400 tons of gold.
	They started buying gold in the 1970s and they're resetting their own currency and getting away from the dollar, even Taiwan.
	Yeah.
	And so this is happening around the world.
	That's the news.
	That's what to watch.
	Everything else is a distraction and the clock's running out.
	And of course, it's how incredibly suicidal and stupid our government is, because you talked about how, look, you know, Moving oil and moving energy around and how we're losing the ability to do that with a petrodollar.
	We've got a government that doesn't care about the dollar and it doesn't care about petro and it doesn't care about energy.
	It doesn't care about manufacturing therefore and it doesn't care about us even being able to afford to heat and cool our homes because it's just the utter contempt For energy that is shown by this government and it's just part of that is reflected in their contempt and disregard for the petrodollar.
	Who needs it, right?
	We're just going to manufacture what we need out of thin air.
	I think it is deliberate.
	I don't think it is stupidity.
	I think they're absolutely trying to sabotage this country in every way they can.
	Especially when you look at the energy stuff.
	Now they're all jumping on the bandwagon of nuclear energy, but that's just going to make things more expensive.
	They want to ban what we have, shut down the plants that we've got, build something completely different, and it's going to mean that even if we get these things built and we don't have a shortfall, which I think we will, but even if we didn't, it's still going to put us at a disadvantage to China, who's going to be able to use cheap coal.
	And other things like that.
	And they're building more and more coal plants.
	They can do as much as they want.
	That's what the Paris Climate Accord is about.
	It's about transferring the manufacturing there.
	So we're looking at some really hard economic times, as they're throwing away both petro and the dollar at the same time with both fists, as much as they can shovel it out.
	Yeah.
	Well, as Klaus Schwab said, they penetrated the cabinets of World Economic Forum members all over the world.
	They penetrated the cabinet.
	They certainly have.
	And, of course, before you got there, Klaus, we had the Council on Foreign Relations and, of course, the Trilateral Commission, all of these internationalists have infiltrated the United States government and yeah that's what they're bringing it down from the inside. They did nothing to stop the petrodollar agreement that lapsed, nothing.
	Just stood by and watched it happen and you're exactly right about, I think this is a head fake, oh we'll build the new cleaner nuclear power plant. No you won't. What you'll do is you'll just disable the grid in anticipation of just not having as much power or having rolling blackouts or having to ration power. It's the same thing for the electric grid with the electric cars as Buttigieg was called out on by Thomas Massey. So you add
	the cars, it's 25 refrigerators right to every household and they don't have the grid to support it.
	But by all means, go get your electric car.
	It's about you not going anywhere.
	It's about you not having upward mobility, not being able to live in comfort, you know, taking down your quality of life.
	That's what this is.
	And again, it's happening from the inside.
	You know, we do it iteratively, right?
	That's right.
	And already you see in Texas, as hot as it is right now, people run their air conditioning.
	We used to never have all of this nail-biting and pearl-clutching about, are we going to have enough electricity to get through the summer?
	Are we going to have enough electricity to get through the winter?
	That type of thing.
	But they, you know, when I went to Texas back in 2012, they were Uh, dismantling coal power plants at that time.
	It's like, this is crazy.
	They're not building anything new.
	They're just taking down what's already paid for what already works and what has the cheaper fuel.
	And as you point out, when they put in these nuclear power plants, it's just going to be for their AI.
	They're not going to have any capacity that they're going to put back into the grid.
	I don't think.
	And if they do, they're going to charge us.
	An amazing amount of money.
	Same thing you see them doing with food and everything else.
	You're going to have to stop what you're doing and we're going to ban that and then you're going to buy the new, brand new, shiny, expensive thing from us.
	You're talking about planned obsolescence.
	This is much worse than refrigerators and automobiles.
	This is about everything systemically, you know, across the board.
	That's right.
	And that's why I think they've opposed things like Bitcoin so much, because Bitcoin relies on a cheap energy grid, a sufficient cheap energy grid.
	It will move to where it can be cheap and where they can get that power easily.
	And it also helps innovate.
	A lot of these Bitcoin miners are taking old power plants and turn them around like old hydroelectric plants and turn them around and refitted them to do Bitcoin mining.
	Those are innovations that, you know, that's why I support things like Bitcoin, especially because of that.
	Because energy, if you look at the worldwide map of the most prosperous countries, they use the most energy.
	There's a correlation between energy usage and, of course, energy supply and a sufficient grid and prosperity.
	And when you start taking that away, you become a third world country.
	Well, that's exactly That's being done to us, and these things aren't even on the ballot, you know, for whatever this election is now, you know.
	Yeah, the vital issues like that are not even being really discussed.
	They're not being discussed at all.
	You know, Trump will give a head fake nod to, well, we need to have more energy and all this other kind of stuff.
	He left the Paris Climate Accord in the entire time.
	and the, you know, pretending that it had been legitimately put in.
	And it never was legitimately put in.
	But it's the Paris Climate Accord that says that China can build as many and as dirty power plants as they want.
	India as well.
	And that's what is causing the fundamental inability of Western countries to be able to compete with Chinese goods now.
	That's one of the biggest new parts of the China price.
	You've got factories in the UK being shut down because they can't compete, they can't make metal, they can't make anything to compete with the Chinese because everything is, energy-wise, is so expensive for manufacturing because it's all energy-intensive.
	They've been given that as a monopoly, if you will.
	And that is fundamental to making us poor and taking everything that we've got.
	It's not just even the standard of living, having energy.
	It's also about life expectancy.
	We used to always make that point with a group that I was in about 15 years ago.
	We tell people, you know, this is, everybody knows, can tell pretty easily that having cheap available energy is going to have a positive effect on your quality of life, but it's also going to have a big effect on how long you live.
	And you can show that from statistics around the world.
	Thank you.
	That's right.
	And I was on a podcast yesterday, and they asked me about Kamala Harris's financial plan, or economic plan, or whatever, lack thereof, whatever it is.
	Communism, yeah.
	It's straight up communism.
	I said, what you're watching is the Hegelian dialectic.
	Because they'll say, this is what we want, and it'll be outrageous, and then the Republicans will somewhat run against it, but their job is to Get about halfway there and then preserve it.
	So the conservatives actually concern, like we've talked about this before, but that's really what, that's the sad part about whatever this election is.
	Uh, none of those, it, the Democrats, you know, into Kamala Harris is putting forward and it's just outright, you know, uh, tax on unrealized gains, you know, like just tax, taxing, just your assets before you even move them before there's an off ramp into anything.
	That's right.
	Putting a tax on, that's just insanity.
	That's a wealth tax and that's about redistribution and that's what her dad wrote a book on as an economics professor.
	Redistribution.
	Well, how do you do that?
	You come after wealth.
	And it's the Biden administration, which is just going to carry over into la la, wants to raise an additional $4.3 trillion over 10 years.
	And as Zero Hedge said, in the worst possible way.
	Opposing, imposing minimum taxes of 25% and then starting to tax stuff that people have not sold.
	You don't know if it's a gain, you don't know if it's a loss.
	And so they're going to start taxing that.
	And of course, it'll only be for the super rich, Tony, because they'll never bother the middle class, except that's the way it always works, right?
	Just like the income tax.
	Yeah, just like the income tax.
	It was only going to be for the super-rich, and so they should be taxed, because, you know, that's part of the basis of socialism and communism is envy.
	You don't look at this and say, you know, one day, I remember reading my dad's business week when I was in high school, and there was a guy who was talking about, he was in Europe, and they were talking about what they called Eurosclerosis, the fact that the European economy could not grow.
	And the guy says, well, you know, it's because of this ingrained socialism and envy that's there.
	He said, if you have a nice car in France, for example, you have to worry about somebody just coming along and keying it because they don't like it.
	They resent it.
	They hate it.
	But he says, if you have a nice car in America, people will look at it, might take pictures of it or whatever.
	Is it something really extravagant?
	And they might kind of think, well, maybe someday I can have something like that, you know?
	He says that's the difference between America and Europe.
	Well, that's the difference really between a free market and this envy of socialism and communism.
	It's about taking everybody down to the least common denominator based on envy and hatred.
	Not on aspiration.
	Yeah.
	Well, the first they use, you know, through cultural Marxism, they went after us on race lines to try to break up our our culture.
	And now that they've taken away the free market for so long and their wealth disparity is so vast, you're going to start seeing that class envy again.
	You're going to start seeing it's so hard to talk to these young entrepreneurs that even start a business today with all the regulations, especially crossing state lines.
	If you've got something that you're shipping out, it can get really Really complicated and costly and stressful and it makes you not even want to attempt anything but these large corporations and I wish I could talk to I don't know if you can even get through to the left or whatever operating system they're on in their mind but I'd like to say you know all of the things that you're supporting you think you're taxing the rich eat the rich all this The rich are supporting those candidates.
	The richest people.
	If they were worried about themselves getting taxed or losing their wealth, they're not.
	They've already offshored everything.
	They have loopholes and foundations and trust that you'll never be able to penetrate.
	But they don't care.
	They want to make sure that you don't compete with them.
	They're using envy against you.
	Yes.
	I wish I could talk to them.
	Instead of us having an open playing field and allowing the best in a meritocracy to work again here in this country, which would be wonderful because America has such a great spirit.
	There's lots of young entrepreneurs out there.
	I see them all the time on social media.
	They want to make it.
	They want to build something.
	And my heart's with them.
	And this is hard work, whether you're doing your own show, whether you're having your own business, or you've got a couple of shops, it doesn't matter.
	It's all hard work.
	It can be worth it.
	I guess at the end of the day, we like to do what we do, but they're making it harder on us for sure.
	And they want to create that UBI, that whole, I think, culture of the universal basic income, of just giving up, which is really satanic.
	Yes.
	And I think it needs to be above.
	And it's just like the interview I had yesterday with the lady who had, she and her husband had a business for 30 years.
	And then the lockdown came along and Tim Walz came along, right?
	And after they'd been locked down for quite some time, they said, well, it's it, we're going to lose everything if we don't open up again.
	And, you know, so there was about, There was only about 200 businesses in the state that were going to open up in defiance of it, and 95% of them caved with the first letter from the state.
	So they didn't stand together, they hung separately, and they actually sent her to jail over this stuff.
	And that's what they wanted to do, they wanted to take the hardest working people, Who had set up a business typically in the service economy and destroy their life.
	And then offer people universal basic income.
	Oh, here's a little small little handout.
	And do we talk about basic?
	That's what these stimulus checks were.
	But we're going to put everybody on unemployment.
	We'll give you some stimulus checks and some other things, but we're not going to allow you to work.
	Not at all.
	And we'll punish you.
	We'll even put you in jail if you open up and work.
	That's the thing that is so disgusting about it.
	And that was bipartisan.
	Oh, absolutely.
	Yeah, and it's really sad to watch the cult around our politics now.
	I just tuned out because people can't even hear.
	I remember being at the Bitcoin conference and one of the speakers brought up things that Trump had said in the past about Bitcoin.
	And I was with my son, my son Houston, and the crowd started booing.
	And then we realized, Houston turned to me and said, I think that they're booing not because of what Trump said, but because the guy brought it up.
	Yes, that's right.
	That's when I knew I'm like, wow, I am in the thick of things.
	Even at the Bitcoin conference, you could hear that's that's where we are in our politics.
	Partisanship is where logic goes to die.
	That's right.
	And that's where we're as broadcasters.
	You and I are both in this thing.
	And I'm just looking around going, wow, this is insane.
	And we're not.
	When you look at what they did and you tell people this and you hear it over and over again, well, it wasn't Trump.
	It was the bad Democrat governors.
	They won't even give credit to the bad Republican governors like DeWine and Brad Little and on and on.
	You know, it's just, it drives me crazy.
	I've heard that so many times.
	It just, I'm starting to have a really quick reflex reaction to that, which is not good.
	When I hear that excuse.
	It wasn't Trump, and it wasn't the Republican governors.
	It was only the Democrat governors.
	It's like, man, I don't know.
	We have very un-serious people for serious times.
	Very un-serious leaders, and then really a lot of un-serious people involved in the political process, because you won't really take a look into The behaviors and the decisions made by these politicians over the last four years, where they stood, did they lock you down?
	Did they mask you up?
	You know, you look at Texas busing those illegal aliens up to Martha's Vineyard, those kind of political stunts, but not closing the border.
	That's what I pay attention to.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Yeah, that doesn't help anything at all.
	I mean, those people, you're going to spend the money to send them somewhere else.
	The United States are going to come back if they want.
	It's absolutely insane.
	You're not going to protect the borders, but you're going to do a stunt like that.
	You're absolutely right.
	On Rumble, Atomic Dog says, Hi, Tony.
	Precious metals are way down today.
	Have you heard about the increased demand on silver with Samsung's new silver battery for EVs?
	I hear demand will be more than current world production.
	I'd not heard of that.
	Have you heard of that?
	I've heard of that.
	And I'll also add that, I mean, silver is so cheap compared to reality, regardless of the EV batteries or solar or what the demand is.
	There was a 200 million ounce deficit last year.
	The year before that, it was 180 million.
	So they have to take from the above ground already produced supply of silver just to meet the needs.
	So 200 million ounces and it's growing.
	There's not enough mining going on.
	Matter of fact, most, I think it's like 70% of all the new silver added to the inventories comes from mining of other metals, whether it's copper or gold or zinc or something else.
	So they're pulling that out as just like an ancillary side show.
	They're not even going and directly looking for silver.
	So, no, the silver markets are completely skewed.
	We learned that in the 1970s with the Hunt family and their empire being taken out by the deep state, in my opinion, because of their exposing the weakness of the dollar in the late 70s, going into 1980 with silver at $52.50 an ounce.
	I was listening to a podcast yesterday.
	They talked about gold at the end of the 70s.
	You know, $35 an ounce in 1971.
	In 1980, $850 an ounce of gold.
	Now, it sounds like, wow, gold's gone up.
	one, it's 1980, $850 an ounce of gold.
	Now it sounds like, wow, gold's gone up $850 in 1980, David.
	Yeah. I mean, that's way more than 2,500 today.
	Yeah.
	By, by a long shot.
	And so, we're not even at the beginning of the revaluation of these commodities, folks, because I dig into this every single day.
	I go into different pay sites of Intel and what's happening in commodities around the world and looking at graphs.
	We're not even close.
	If you look at the total financial market around the world, it's about $450 trillion.
	Gold has a $16 trillion market cap.
	has a $16 trillion market cap, okay? I mean, silver's got a $1.4 trillion market cap. Bitcoin, $1.1 trillion.
	Again, it's 450 trillion in so-called assets around the world.
	Most of that's in fake fiat.
	A big portion of that's in sovereign wealth funds and paper.
	So where does all that, where do all those funds go?
	I'm not saying gold's going to go to $10,000 an ounce, but we're not even close.
	You look at the damage done to the dollar over the last four plus years, which is, that's when it really accelerated.
	80% of all the dollars ever created in the last 48 to 50 months or so.
	So, no, I mean, we're not even close.
	Silver, who knows what it's actually worth?
	Yeah.
	I don't know.
	I just know it's cheap right now.
	I was at the gold and silver trading floor on Friday, turning in some stuff in Dallas, and I walked out and got in my car.
	I saw gold hit $2,500 an ounce.
	And I thought, wow, what a time to be alive.
	And it really doesn't make the headlines that it should.
	And the big story is not gold going up.
	The big story is these fiat currencies denominated against gold are going down.
	That's the story.
	Here's a good example of that.
	This is off of Kitco.
	This is three days ago, the 19th.
	Gold prices supported at $2,500 an ounce as the U.S.
	Two days, three days ago, the 19th.
	Gold prices supported at $2,500 an ounce as the U.S. dollar drops 2% this month.
	And that was on the 19th of August.
	So, already, you know, you're like three weeks through and it's down by 2% the dollar is.
	So, as you're pointing out, it's the dollar that's dropping in value.
	Yeah, it's happening rapidly.
	I think it's happening faster.
	Well, let's just do a thought experiment with some of these elites.
	Okay, say that we never put sanctions on Russia.
	Say we didn't go Russia into invading Ukraine, but just take that off the table.
	Say there's no sanctions.
	Is gold at $2,500 an ounce?
	Say we didn't do the massive trillions and trillions of money printing through COVID 1984 or the lockdowns.
	Is gold at $2,500 an ounce?
	You could start going through, say about the rate cuts, you know, all the rate did, if we, if we didn't do all the rate cuts that we did, would gold be at $2,500 an ounce?
	Again, gold at $2,500 because of the damage done to the dollar.
	Yeah.
	Not because gold somehow people just, you know, finally realized that gold's a great asset.
	That's not how any of this works.
	Matter of fact, the West and our markets aren't even what's driving gold.
	It's foreign nations and people in places like India and China and around the world.
	But it's not us.
	Even Western retail gold demand is not up.
	So, yeah, you're seeing people buy gold at Costco and stuff, you hear those headlines every once in a while, but really, overall, it's not up.
	That's right.
	Yeah, America's not really doing the saving.
	They're going further into debt.
	As a matter of fact, it's a point made by Radice Bro on Rumble.
	Thank you for the tip, by the way.
	He says, Americans with credit cards and their personal wealth creation are also contributing to inflation, which is never talked about.
	Yeah, Americans just want to keep putting it on the credit card.
	I mean, that's the...
	You know, whether it's the government or whether it's individual consumers, it's just like, charge it, you know, and kick it down the road.
	Well, it's become very systemic inside our society, unfortunately.
	We've borrowed from our children and our children's children for this particular present, and it's not good.
	I mean, look at our foreign policy and what with the foreign aid and stuff that we've done, the damage we've done to Our economy by just not taking care of our infrastructure and giving all of our funds away to places like Ukraine.
	I mean, it's unforgivable at some level.
	And I mean, that's why you've got to become your own bank, folks.
	The government's not coming to save you.
	Financial institutions, bailouts, whatever that means to you, start investing in yourself, protecting yourself, be your own bank.
	I agree.
	Yeah, and when you look at all this stuff about, you know, taxing capital gains, you haven't sold anything.
	As this one person points out, said, yeah, if you really wanted to address the problem of inequality and, you know, and fairness and all the rest of the stuff, you would have focused On what happened during COVID, where they hand out to the public $600.
	But he says, when I did the math during COVID, the total amount spent to bail the country out when we decided to shut down the economy.
	Well, it's just really shutting down Main Street.
	That's what they shut.
	They didn't shut down the Wall Street.
	To shut down the economy and have the Federal Reserve replace it with a fiat house of cards.
	That amounted to something like $17,500 for every citizen in the United States.
	But we got those $600 stimulus checks.
	That's great.
	So they rob us for $17,500 and they give us a small check.
	And that's what people don't even realize.
	And they're still cheering these people who did this to us.
	That's what's amazing to me.
	Yeah, we haven't quite felt the repercussions.
	Did the damage done, and I don't want them to happen.
	I love this country and the people in it, but there's going to be some hard times ahead, and I think it'll make 1929 look like a picnic, in my opinion, just given the sheer number of it.
	I saw a tweet from Robert Kiyosaki earlier today, and he said, Does anybody know how long ago a trillion seconds was?
	It's almost 32,000 years ago.
	I mean, just the number trillion, we're throwing that around every hundred days, we go a trillion dollars into debt.
	Again, it took us 200 years to get there the first time.
	That's just where we are in this country.
	These numbers are unsustainable and really, you know, it's fake and we know that like it's fake money.
	We don't owe it, I guess, because you could just, you know, again, you could just throw that out and just start over.
	But the problem is, is the financial system that we're built on, it runs against the debt to the gross domestic product as far as the strength of the currency.
	And our debt to GDP, it's like 140%.
	That's like running, you know, like we were at World War II, except it's been going on that way for, gosh, decades.
	Yeah.
	And accelerating.
	So there has to be an endgame.
	And unfortunately, I think that the elite are going to do their golden parachutes.
	They're doing this controlled demolition of the dollar.
	You can see that they're not stopping it.
	I think they know where it's headed.
	They want to make the moves on their chessboard.
	You're not supposed to know what's around the corner.
	You're supposed to pay attention to the politics and the personality and all that stuff.
	And it's to your own detriment.
	That's right.
	Yeah, if you want a golden parachute, there's not too many options available to those of us in the middle class.
	You can start to build a golden parachute by accumulating gold and silver and getting out of that system.
	And, you know, it's not even the economic stuff that we've talked about this entire time.
	It's also the surveillance and the, you know, the CVDC, as you mentioned earlier.
	You know, we've just briefly talked about that, but it's that control grid That is what I want to escape, even as much if not more so than the inflation that is there.
	But I think it is going to be really, really bad in these next four years.
	We're right at the tail end of this fourth turning.
	And as you point out, everything is really accelerating.
	Tell us, your program is coming out following this one, is that correct?
	Yes, sir.
	I try to do it every Thursday.
	Last week we couldn't do it because of the system that I had at the hotel.
	I was in Los Angeles for a podcast.
	But every Thursday, following your interview, I do the Arterburn radio transmission on Rockfin on my ex at Tony Arterburn.
	You can find me there.
	We do a live stream.
	It's an hour long, so if you're tuning in, please come find me.
	We'll have a nice time.
	Anything else you want to tell us about what's going on at Wise Wolf?
	Anything else new?
	Well, we're continuing to get supply and we're gaining new members and I appreciate everybody who's joining Wolfpack.
	If you haven't looked at Wolfpack, go to davidknight.gold and just check that out.
	It's easy to join.
	We make it real easy.
	If you want to cancel, upgrade, whatever you want to do, we don't give you a run around.
	You can just email us or text us or give us a call.
	I make it really easy for folks and you can start a stacking you know gold and silver lows $50 a month we have a kids program at 35.
	The more people that join the better off we are because I can do better buy-ins. I got some really interesting products that I'm putting in this month and next month and so we're already already planning that so just appreciate all of your listeners and of course we do anything there's no minimums at Wise Wolf. I have the inverse of most gold and silver companies.
	I'm talking to real everyday people, because when I started this business, I'm not wealthy.
	Again, I do fine, but if I called one of these 1-800 numbers, they'd be disappointed in what I had to give them.
	Anytime we can help, davidknight.gold, and just really appreciate your audience.
	Thank you so much, Tony, and we really do appreciate your help.
	And again, right after this program, you can find Tony on Rockfin and on Twitter or X. I guess I'll always call it Twitter.
	I might as well, since they've frozen me.
	I'm going to freeze their name.
	They've frozen my followers.
	I'm going to freeze their name at Twitter because.
	But thank you so much for joining us.
	Thank you for what you do to support the program, Tony.
	Folks, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show, Now.
	And I want to thank on Rumble 12, June 1776.
	Thank you for the tip.
	And he writes, moderation of content is no virtue.
	That's right.
	DK, the DK Rumble channel, one of the only free speech Rumble channels.
	Well, thank you.
	And folks, please, wherever you're watching it, and if you're watching live, please like the stream wherever you're watching it.
	If you're listening to it recorded, please like it on Rumble or BitChute or Odyssey or any of the downloadable podcast things.
	That helps us with visibility.
	Very important for us.
	And it is, you know, it's a real struggle to get past the censorship and the shadow banning.
	So that's something that really does help us a great deal.
	Let's talk a little bit about war.
	We have this attack and I haven't really talked a great deal about it and part of it is it's very difficult to understand through the fog of war what is really happening.
	Which way is momentum going?
	Is this something that is real or is it being hyped up by both sides?
	Everybody is lying about everything that's happening when it comes to war for certain and it's difficult for us to be able to tell what's going on but this attack into the Kursk region by Ukraine into Russia.
	Everybody's talking about it, and one of the things that they're talking about is even the London Times, and I know I had some British friends who said it's not the London Times, it's the Times.
	Everybody else gets a qualifier, but not the original Times, I'd say.
	But anyway, the London Times.
	I was even talking about the fact that the UK had a big role in this.
	On August the 6th, the Ukrainian forces launched their largest attack on Russian territory, and the advance into the Kursk region was swiftly halted by the Russian military, says RT.
	That's not what the other press is saying.
	They're saying that they're still there.
	They've actually made some gains.
	Of course, the Russians are saying that they halted them.
	According to the article at The Times, the members of this formation are already specialists in street fighting and some of the bloodiest battles of the conflict.
	The Times reported a month before they were dispatched into Kursk, some of the unit were sent to England where they underwent a few days of training alongside British soldiers.
	The major force of this training course was, quote, raids on high-rise buildings, it revealed.
	Western officials have celebrated and voiced support for the Ukrainian incursion into Kursk, but they denied any prior knowledge of the operation or the involvement in it.
	However, a top advisor to Zelensky claimed earlier this week there were discussions between partner forces, just not on the public level.
	The advisor to Putin told Izvestia on Friday, last Friday, that Kiev's incursion was planned with the involvement of NATO and Western special services.
	It was the U.S.
	and its allies who put the junta at the head of Ukraine, while NATO countries have supplied Kiev with weapons, military instructors, and continuous intelligence while controlling the actions of neo-Nazis.
	And so, it's not credible at all that the U.S.
	and the U.K.
	didn't know anything about it.
	It is credible, especially when the Times says it, that they were actually behind this, and to what purpose?
	Well, there is a reason.
	One author says why the US is playing dumb about this.
	They would like for this to happen.
	As they look at it, they are extremely excited when you look at Lindsey Graham.
	He can barely contain his enthusiasm.
	To deter China, I think, is to get Ukraine right.
	And I just got back from Ukraine.
	I am in awe of these people.
	We were told Kiev would fall in four days.
	Well, two and a half years later, they're taking Russian territory.
	They're in Russia.
	They've taken half of what Putin seized from the initial invasion.
	And we need to pour it on and help these people when it comes to dealing with this Russian invasion to reset the world.
	Yeah.
	And so, um, this was a move that was done to, you know, it's kind of a gamble.
	Uh, we've identified, uh, through our surveillance as soft area.
	If we can go in there and, you know, we're stymied over here, uh, can't make a move, can't make any gains.
	Uh, so maybe we can jump into this area and, uh, tell everybody, give everybody that there's some hope.
	And so let's send some more tens of billions of dollars to Ukraine.
	White House Press Secretary Jean-Pierre claimed that the U.S.
	didn't know about Ukraine's plans to invade Kursk, Russia's Kursk.
	Unbelievable, since there's no way that its intelligence services didn't catch even a hint of it, not to mention likely participation in the preparations.
	The question is, why didn't Russia catch a hint of it?
	And this is what a lot of them have said.
	They said it just shows the weakness of Russia, that it is much weaker than people had thought.
	And so they're going to keep poking the bear until they get them as a dangerous cornered animal.
	That's the thing that is concerning.
	Certainly we have seen that Russia was not very, you know, on paper it looked like they should have easily been able to crush Ukraine early on.
	They didn't.
	And now, as they have started shipping more sophisticated weapons, the American military jets and things like this, and longer-range missiles, the US and others have kind of laid back and allowed the Ukrainians to start using this and waiting to see, after they cross one red line after the other, what's going to happen.
	And what is really concerning about this is that regardless of whether or not Russia is weaker than anybody believed, what's dangerous about it is that they're going to keep going until it is a, again, they painted them into a corner, and when you do that, you've got a very dangerous situation with a country that still has a lot of nuclear weapons.
	I just don't understand the people, the Lindsey Grahams of this world, and all the rest of them, who continue to push, push, push.
	When Biden spoke, and was given his final farewell address, listen to what he had to say about the war.
	We united Europe like it hadn't been united for years.
	Finland and Sweden to NATO.
	Ten days before he died, Henry Kissinger called.
	And said, not since Napoleon, as Europe not looked over their shoulder at Russia with dread, until now.
	Until now.
	Well, guess what?
	Putin thought he'd take Kiev in three days.
	Three years later, Ukraine is still free!
	Yeah, remember what I said about the Democrat Party, how they used to be war?
	Bye.
	You know, now they're just for war, aren't they?
	You know, they got that slogan forward again.
	Remember when people blocked off the D when Obama was using that?
	They're just for war.
	Obama, who added so many wars.
	I mean, by the time Obama left, seven wars.
	And Trump kept juggling them all and kept them all up in the air.
	He didn't stop a single one of them.
	But they want to just keep going.
	And where does it all stop?
	You know, there's a Biden with his angry get-off-my-lawn attitude about how we're going to take down Russia.
	These people, it's a murder-suicide cult in Washington.
	Truly a satanic.
	So, five reasons why the US is playing dumb.
	Maintain plausible deniability.
	For escalation control.
	Avoid embarrassment and responsibility once Ukraine falls.
	This person says that it's inevitable that they will get them out of Russia.
	Well, we'll see what happens with it.
	Propagate the David versus Goliath optics to boost morale.
	They had to do something like this because everybody in the Western press was saying that this is collapsing.
	Number four, keep up the charade of a gentleman's agreement gone bad.
	And then troll Russia.
	After they previously denied supporting Donbass.
	So, is this the beginning of the end for Ukraine, says another source, because Germany has put a ban on all new Ukrainian military aid, unlike America.
	You know, is it anything that we would ever do?
	You got our wonderful, conservative, Bible-thumping Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, who said, well, all right, I don't want to have any Ukrainian more spending, you know, before he became Speaker.
	As soon as he becomes Speaker, he's like, OK, we'll do Ukrainian spending, but you're going to have to spend as much money at the border as you spend to Ukraine, that type of thing.
	And then after a couple of months, he says, forget about spending at the border.
	Let's just go to Ukraine.
	Let's just do exactly what Biden and the Democrats and military industrial complex that put him in power.
	You're talking about controlled opposition.
	Now, Mike Johnson is exhibit A.
	And same thing is going to happen with Trump.
	All of the brave talk about all this stuff.
	Same thing is going to happen.
	However, in Germany, it's a little bit different.
	And Germany has been a big part of the war effort for Ukraine.
	So, on Thursday, in the aftermath of the Wall Street Journal report, That was trying to move the narrative cover story about the Nord Stream sabotage, which nobody believes.
	We're now supposed to believe that it was some rogue group of Ukrainians who did it.
	They somehow managed to figure out how to get to the bottom of the ocean.
	Without any help from the people who could really do it.
	So they said, instead of the CIA being blamed for the explosion of the critical gas pipeline from Russia into Germany, they said supposedly unnamed intelligence sources.
	This is what the Wall Street Journal wants you to believe, by the way.
	Talk about mainstream media.
	Wall Street Journal is nothing but disinformation for the US government.
	They say instead of it being unnamed intelligence sources who went rogue, when Zelensky got cold feet, they said, they were responsible for coordinating the sabotage using a handful of rank amateurs who somehow managed to sneak to the bottom of the Baltic Sea and conduct an unprecedented military operation.
	No matter the laughable veracity of the report, relations between Germany and Ukraine are about to turn ugly.
	And we asked, why is this story just coming out now?
	Well, it looks like relations between Germany and Ukraine are about to turn ugly, said Zero Hedge on August the 15th.
	And then you get this Wall Street Journal report to come out to try to control the narrative.
	German media reports this U-turn in the narrative, which, according to some, meant that NATO should now unleash its full military power against Ukraine, which had single-handedly attacked German assets by blowing up the Nord Stream.
	It was meant to soften the blow from Germany's decision to finally cut off Ukraine and Zelensky's unprecedented grift.
	They said there's a moratorium in Germany on new assistance, and it's going to affect new requests for funding, not for previously approved aid, but that future funding would no longer come from Germany's federal budget, but from proceeds from frozen Russian assets.
	And since we already know that recent attempts to liquidate Russian assets crashed and burned over fears of escalating Russian retaliation, this effectively means no more aid for Ukraine.
	So is Biden telling you the truth?
	Is Russia no longer afraid?
	I mean, is Europe no longer afraid of Russia, as Henry Kissinger allegedly said to Biden?
	And isn't it interesting that Henry Kissinger is calling up the Democrat, you know?
	Oh, isn't he a Republican?
	Yeah, he's just a Jew political shill.
	I tell you, when you look at this, the kind of things that we've seen in terms of coups and false flags and all the rest of the stuff laid right at the feet of that war criminal, Henry Kissinger.
	Still, go back and take a look at Operation Gladio and Steve Pachinik, Alex Jones' pal, who has lied to everybody, kicked off the Stop the Steal thing for January the 6th.
	It was Steve Pachinik Who had been a part of Operation Gladio, who the Italian government said in their investigation had given the order to kill their kidnapped Italian Prime Minister.
	Steve Pucinich was sent there by Henry Kissinger.
	Always at the globalist Bilderberg confabs, every single one of them Kissinger went to.
	And so that's what this is.
	This is NATO.
	This is Bilderberg.
	These are the globalists.
	We are the globalists.
	And many in the mainstream alternative media are the controlled opposition of the globalists as well.
	Berlin, which is Europe's main supplier of military aid to Ukraine, had previously signaled a change in course last month.
	The compromise detailed plans to slash future assistance to Ukraine by half to fulfill other spending priorities, and now it appears that even this token amount is going to be cut to zero.
	The G7's decision to extend the $50 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by immobilized Russian assets, was the summit's most significant step forward.
	The loan structure reflects a typical compromise between the U.S.
	and Europe.
	The U.S.
	wanted to take all 280 billion dollars of Russia's frozen assets.
	European countries, particularly France, Germany, Belgium, aggressively shied away from this, viewing it as too aggressive and fearing Russian reciprocation.
	So, supposedly, the Germans don't think that they're cowed down that much.
	Meanwhile, the primary source of funding for Ukraine, the Biden family and various deep state operatives, is about to dry out after Biden finally leaves the White House and quits politics forever in three months.
	That's according to Zero Hedge.
	And I think they've got that exactly wrong.
	Look, Biden isn't running anything.
	Yeah, he's corrupt.
	They're connected with Ukraine and all the rest of the stuff.
	But whether or not Biden leaves, it's going to be the same people running, la la, the communists.
	Same exact people.
	Nothing is going to change.
	It's still going to be the military-industrial complex, intelligence communities, all of these people who engineered the coup and the Obama administration.
	They're all still going to be there, whether it's Obama, Biden, or Harris, if it is her.
	And they're going to be running things if it's Trump as well.
	He didn't stop any of these wars that Obama, the Obama group, let's just call it that way, the Obama group started.
	So, according to Politico, contentions over Ukraine reportedly deepened the rifts of the ruling coalition in Berlin.
	They are fighting amongst themselves.
	It's a very tenuous ruling coalition that they put together with several parties.
	And even as the pipelines were blown up, You had the alternative for Deutschland, the alternative for Germany, the rising party that actually, they call them populist parties because they actually want to do something for their own country.
	They were demanding that the pipeline be turned on, and they blew up that pipeline before it was ever even turned on, and blew up the other pipeline that had been bringing gas into Germany.
	The intention of our leaders, all of these leaders who have so much disdain for populism, they actually have disdain for our own countries.
	They're doing everything they can to sabotage our own countries, just like blowing up the pipeline.
	And there's no country that is more interested in sabotaging the West than the U.S.
	government.
	And that's the way it is.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	♪♪
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Well, folks, what is it that we can do if we don't get so focused on the federal politics?
	Well, there's a lot of things that we can do at the local level, especially preparing, and there's many different things that you can do to prepare.
	As we've talked to Tony earlier, you can start to set up some wealth protection with gold and silver.
	You can Start to educate yourself about how to maintain your water supply and many other things in an emergency situation, and do that with the CivilDefenseManual.com that Jack Lawson, who I talked to last Friday, has.
	Great information and advice on preparing for things.
	And there's another, Patriot Be Best.
	Which can help to keep the natural food chain going in your area.
	Things that you can learn and understand about how to keep a natural food chain going as they're working as hard as they can to shut down our ability to produce even our own food.
	The good people at Patriot Bee Best have done extensive research and study about this important issue.
	They've created an educational online digest to help spread the word about the challenges facing the American bee.
	And educating American Patriots to engage as advocates to inform others and to band together to help solve this problem.
	Patriot Bee Best is a digital bee sanctuary for education, engagement, and real change.
	These people know bees and Patriot Bee Best is laser focused on restoration and preservation of the American bee population.
	You can learn about how the honeybee benefits all of us, discover bee-friendly initiatives, and many other helpful resources.
	You can subscribe at a worker bee level to The Buzz, get educational information, advocacy opportunities, and bee-friendly products, bee rescue activities, many other things.
	If you go to the Queen Bee subscriber level, You'll get access to bonus content on patriotic topics related to restoring and reinforcing American values.
	Check them out at patriotbeebest.com to subscribe and to see all the cool related bee products they have to offer.
	It is the destination for all things American bee.
	And then check out the links.
	They have a link why our American bee population is under attack.
	All of that is at patriotbeebest.com.
	Let's take a look at what is not working.
	We have Nantucket residents are furious because as they put these offshore wind turbines, they don't last forever.
	And the experiment says one resident gets an F-.
	Residents are seeing broken wind turbine blade fragments all over the beach.
	What was this about biodegradable stuff and everything, right?
	Do they ever care about that?
	No.
	If you look at what has happened to the radical green agenda, It's not at all about cleaning things up.
	It's not at all about recycling.
	It's not at all about being natural.
	The great Nantucket experiment gets an F-minus, said the chairman of O'Leary Ventures to Bloomberg, talking about the offshore turbine failures that have resulted in broken fiberglass littering the pristine beaches of Nantucket last month.
	Said it's not a golden example of success in wind turbines, that's for sure.
	The federal government ordered Vineyard Winds Project south of Nantucket last month to halt construction and electricity generation following the blade malfunction.
	The company managing the project determined the turbine blade failure was due to, quote, a manufacturing deviation.
	Boeing should try that excuse.
	Yeah, we just messed it up when we built it, right?
	Manufacturing deviation.
	Nantucket is merely a casualty of the Biden-Harris administration's push to greenify, as they put it, the U.S.
	economy with unreliable wind and solar.
	The administration has pledged to develop 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030.
	30 gigawatts, Marty.
	There you go.
	So, one account on Twitter that goes by the name of Bernie, it's not Bernie Sanders, said, net zero climate zealots are very quiet over a wind turbine the size of the Eiffel Tower collapsing near Nantucket.
	Also silent about the 300-foot blade crashing to the ocean floor and sending shards of toxic fiberglass onto beaches and shorelines.
	Shh, be quiet.
	They're saving the planet, he writes.
	Yeah, that's...
	Anything for this stuff.
	No amount of money is too expensive.
	None of the problems about what do we do with these blades when they inevitably have passed their lifetime or when they have a catastrophic failure like this.
	One Nantucket resident said the green energy push offshore was jammed down our throats by the federal government.
	And we are not represented in this process.
	Always.
	This is what is always happening.
	All of this stuff is being jammed down our throats.
	And if it's offshore like that, there's not a great deal that we can do about it.
	But again, if you want to stop the federal government from jamming things down your throat, about the only option you've got is to get involved at the state and local level.
	Constitutionally, legally, there are things that we can do, but we've got to have people who've got the backbone to do it.
	Green hydrogen subsidies are now 1,900 times larger than what is given to nuclear.
	Well, again, what about fossil fuel?
	When we look at all this stuff, it's the government that is picking the winners and the losers.
	Are they going to give more to hydrogen than they do to nuclear?
	Are they going to give more to solar than they do to gas or to oil?
	Why should they subsidize it at all?
	And yet what we see from the conservatives is, wait a minute, I want my subsidy, and my subsidy is not as big as these other guys over here.
	That clip that I played for you the other day when I did the Atlas Shrugged thing, you know?
	Straight out of Ayn Rand.
	The government picks which industries are going to succeed and which ones are going to fail.
	And how do they do that?
	Well, with their subsidies.
	You see, as long as we have subsidies of any sort, we have crony capitalism.
	We are not managing anything.
	We're not investing in anything.
	It is just the picking the winners and losers and who they're going to subsidize.
	The government should not be picking winners and losers.
	But this article from Robert Bryce says hydrogen producers can get up to $25 billion per EJ in federal tax credits.
	That's nine times solar, 47 times wind, 1,800 times hydrocarbons.
	And so again, the real issue is not that they're picking the wrong winners and losers, or they're giving money to their friends.
	The real issue is that we've got the federal government picking and micromanaging our economy.
	It ought to be whoever is the most efficient.
	But of course, in order to have that kind of system, you're going to have to expose the lies that are underlying all of this green agenda, just like you've got to expose the lies underlying the pandemic agenda.
	The late Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway said, show me the incentives and I'll show you the outcome.
	And so they would invest in the companies they knew who was going to win because the government is picking it to incentivize it.
	Whenever you wonder why the U.S.
	isn't building more nuclear plants and is instead lavishing hundreds of billions of dollars on politically popular forms of alternative energy, remember Munger's line, he says.
	Well, again, you know, nuclear, every one of these has got its own issues.
	And it is the, you know, there's none of these that are foolproof.
	None of them are without their drawbacks.
	Quite frankly, you know, if we didn't have this issue of this, this fantasy chicken little alarmism about CO2, again, 0.04% of the atmosphere is CO2.
	Only 3% of that, they even claim, only 3% of it is man-made.
	So it's clearly nonsense.
	Especially when you look at people saying, well, look, things are hotter now.
	Well, if we're having a hotter summer, just understand that we had an offshore volcano That increased the amount of water vapor by 10%.
	You know, we're talking about trying to control CO2, which is 0.4% of the atmosphere, and only 3% of it man-made.
	Well, the water is the thing that dominates the atmosphere.
	It is the key greenhouse gas.
	And that dominant form, and we're not talking about something that is, you know, 0.04%.
	We're talking about something that is the vast majority of it was increased by 10% from that underwater volcano.
	And so if we don't attack the root cause of that, they're going to continue to reward their friends and to punish us with more and more expensive energy.
	The true cost of Biden's bet on battery electric vehicles two months into his presidency.
	Biden announced a $2 trillion infrastructure plan that included $174 billion in grants, subsidies and other payouts to encourage Americans to switch to battery electric vehicles.
	And since that initial quote unquote investment, billions and billions more have been poured into what is increasingly a failing effort to convince or to control auto buyers to switch.
	These huge expenditures, together with COVID and war monies, have ballooned the national debt to the point that 76% of income taxes are needed just to pay interest on the debt.
	The idea that government knows best is the fatal thing.
	And so you look at what they're doing for the climate MacGuffin, the COVID MacGuffin, the war, all the rest of this stuff, what is that all?
	You add that all up, what does it equal?
	It equals a crash.
	And people have seen now, finally, they've experienced the fatal flaws of the electric vehicles.
	And as I said, in South Korea, the fire was so devastating that the South Korean people have pulled back.
	That's just one example of it.
	It's going to get worse with these battery energy storage sites that have to be there to back up the solar and the wind.
	You want to talk about a fire hazard that's there?
	And we just had another big electric truck that caught an electric semi-truck.
	The concern is about the toxic gases that are there.
	See, that's the issue.
	You look at CO2.
	CO2 must be stopped.
	But nobody wants to talk about the gases that are released that are potentially fatal to humans from these electric fires that are so difficult to put out.
	So it is really getting the cart before the horse.
	We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back
	Music playing...
	Defending the American Dream dream.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Quick update on the DNC, the dilation and curatage that is happening in Chicago.
	Or I guess we could call it the demonic convention.
	They now have the FBI conducting an investigation to try to find out how maggots got into the DNC.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	How they got into the DNC breakfast.
	There we go.
	We know how the maggots got in.
	They all jumped into politics.
	No, we're not talking about the human maggots there.
	We're talking about maggots in their food.
	About 6.45 a.m., hotel guests discovered the nauseating protein-packed topping.
	Yeah, exactly.
	What is wrong with that?
	I thought they wanted to eat bugs.
	Well, here's an extra helping of bugs for you.
	Maggots.
	Requiring at least one person to be assessed by first responders.
	Actually ate a bug.
	We can confirm that a group of individuals caused a disruption at a DNC-related breakfast event at our hotel this morning.
	Call the FBI.
	That's the refrain of the Democrats all the time, isn't it?
	Call in the FBI and investigate this.
	They again, I guess they needed a little bit more protein because the DNC has asked for vendors to prioritize low emission meats, low emission meats.
	So I guess you could say meats back on the menu boys.
	Um, but, uh, everybody looking around as to where the beef is.
	Well, Babylon B says, um, Oh no, a man at the DNC thinking that he was in line for a food truck actually gets a vasectomy.
	Wait, I just wanted a burrito.
	Yeah, these are the people that have an abortion van as a part of the things that they're looking for.
	Meanwhile, you've got Evangelicals for Harris praising a pro-choice pastor for preaching that we're all God's children at the DNC.
	Wait a minute, if we're all God's children, why are they trying to kill God's children?
	And why is this pastor supporting all of this?
	It absolutely makes no sense.
	And yet, when you look at what is happening in our society, I said at the beginning of the program, we have the statues and the monuments to American society and American history are coming down all over the place, being defaced by these same people.
	We now have new monuments coming up.
	Everywhere, and of course one of these is a 90-foot statue being unveiled in Houston.
	And this is a statue to a 90-foot tall Henneman statue that was erected on August the 18th in Houston, Texas.
	The statue is named the Statue of Union, now the third tallest statue in the United States.
	This is what it looks like.
	The statue stands as a tribute to Lord Hanuman's role in reuniting Sri Rama and Sita.
	These are places that I don't even know about.
	Somewhere in India, something about that.
	So you now have this Indian population in Houston that is erecting a giant 90-foot statue about this, and the colossal figure is located at the Sri Ashtalakshmi Temple in Sugar Land, Texas.
	Sugar Land, Texas, that's where Karen and I lived when we went, we're there in 1980, working for Texas Instruments.
	But we're not allowed to celebrate American heroes.
	I'm not sure that that's a real person.
	I'm thinking, I didn't look this up, the Henneman statue.
	This, since this is part of a temple, it may be part of their religion, a foreign country, a foreign religion, but it's okay.
	We just can't have any American statues.
	You can't put up statues either side of the Civil War, for example.
	They emphasize the significance of the statue in symbolizing the glory of Indian heritage and spiritual unity.
	See, I think that said, I think they're supposed, I think the Sri Rama and the Sita are two spiritual constructs that he's this other fictional character.
	I mean, look at the face.
	It's like a monkey face or something, right?
	I don't know exactly what that is, but this is what's happening to our country.
	We need more immigrants, by the way.
	A controversial statue artist also in Houston.
	This is something that just happened with the As the hurricane was going through, we had something happen to this abortion statue.
	This is something that was put up at the University of Houston.
	This is a statue to celebrate abortion.
	Very weird pagan thing.
	It's a head with ram horns on it or baphomet horns or something like that.
	The arms are spindly things like branches or something.
	And then around its neck, it has a lace collar that is supposed to be reminiscent of Darth Vader Ginsburg.
	It was something that was done by an Indian sculptor who is a feminist, and they premiered this sculpture in New York to critical acclaim.
	And then they put it down at the University of Houston.
	Back in March, there was a lot of protest, as you see there.
	Stopped the university's satanic abortion statue.
	That's from Texas Right to Life.
	The artist, this 18-foot statue, they were going to have a ceremony there.
	And the ceremony was stopped, but they still put the statue there.
	The statue, called Witness, stands tall next to the Cullen Family Plaza fountain at the center of the campus.
	And it is supposed to represent the fight for abortion rights.
	It quickly drew criticism from anti-abortion organizations that collectively urged the university to remove the statue from the campus.
	The American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family, and Property, and also Students for Life of America, turned out last week to object to the statue that protesters deemed ugly and satanic.
	It is also opposed by Texas' right to life.
	Thanks to enormous pressure from pro-life organizations, the university removed the event entirely, but they kept the sculpture up.
	As the statue remained there, so did our need to speak to life.
	Again, on February 29th, a non-profit organization says that they're advocating a protection of free speech, just saying, well, we need to have this statue and this celebration up.
	But again, are these the kind of people, were they pro-choice when it came to masks, to jabs?
	That they defend free speech when people were pushing back against the lies of the pandemic?
	I don't think so.
	I don't think advocating baby murder is covered under free speech.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Well, actually, it is.
	Just not, you can talk about baby murder, and we should be able to oppose it, but since they're us, they should be stopped from murdering the babies, but I guess they can talk about it.
	I think if you advocate baby murder, we just remove you from society.
	Like, oh, you said that?
	Hmm.
	Maybe we take you out back.
	Yeah, well somebody did take the statue out back as the...
	Hurricane came through, a hurricane barrel.
	Somebody beheaded the statue, and so it now looks a lot better.
	But it's still there!
	They won't remove it, and the person who put this together, Sikandar is her last name, Shazia Sikandar, said that she does not want it repaired.
	She wants to leave it there as, you know, an example of how hateful the people who want to save babies are.
	So, it has now been beheaded, but it is still there.
	As a matter of fact, when this was being talked about back in February the 7th, the people who opposed it, the Texas Right to Life, they said, in terms of defining what this thing was, they said, written on the sculpture is the word Hava.
	Which means Eve in Arabic and in Hebrew, which Sikander celebrated.
	She said, yeah, it was to be about Eve.
	She said Eve was the first lawbreaker, right?
	Well, as Texas Right to Life said, disobedience to God should not be esteemed by society, much less lauded with a statue.
	On the contrary, art should reflect truth, goodness, and beauty, three timeless values that reveal the true nature of God.
	Art cannot have beauty without truth, and art cannot have truth without goodness.
	But, of course, if you're in the Houston area, they will have a statue honoring child sacrifice.
	And I think the appropriate thing to do for the people who, again, want to dismember babies, maybe next time there's an event that takes the power down, somebody will dismember another portion of that abortion honoring statue.
	Isn't it amazing?
	You know, we cannot honor people who, of course, nobody is perfect.
	We put these statues up of honorable people like Robert E. Lee, and they make a ritual out of decapitating that and burning the head.
	Remember when they did that?
	Yeah, melting down the head.
	Also remember, folks, I'm just being edgy.
	Don't actually commit any violence.
	That's right.
	Yeah, we're not encouraging any of that stuff, of course, right?
	Thank you for listening.
	Have a good day.
	Let me tell you, the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears!
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now.
	Yeah, good job!
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidNightShow.com.

▲