Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 20, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:40

The David Knight Show - 08/20/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 20th of August, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, we're going to take a look at the beginning of the DNC. Biden had a very strange farewell, and there are many strange things going on at the DNC. But there's also, when we look across the pond at England, the woman who was arrested multiple times for silent prayer has now gotten a big call.
	Compensation from the police, but the new government has decided they're going to fix that.
	And they're talking about outlawing silent prayer.
	Are they afraid of its efficacy?
	No, actually, they think they are God.
	It is a power play.
	Because the Church of England is dropping the word church.
	At least they're getting honest about it.
	And in Cuba, where they have all of the classic cars.
	Well, we have the classic plan is playing out there.
	They can't get fuel, so they're pushing them to EV motorbikes.
	Just wait until the fires start.
	We'll be right back, stay with us.
	Well, I'm going to begin, actually, not with the Democrat convention, but with a person who was always heavily involved with the Democrat convention.
	That is Phil Donahue, who I'm sure you've noticed now, died yesterday, at the age of 88.
	I always thought it was kind of interesting.
	I used to watch Phil Donahue when I was in high school.
	I used to like to watch the talk shows and I would sit there.
	Karen can tell you. I would sit there and say, well, that's not the way I would have answered that.
	I would have said this. I like to kind of debate them in my mind and sometimes out loud.
	But Phil Donahue was one of the old school leftists.
	He was a radical leftist at the time.
	But he was also one of the old school, which meant that he was anti-war, which meant that he was a bleeding-heart liberal.
	Yeah, it was misplaced compassion, but at least there was compassion there.
	Not like the full-speed-ahead, let's-have-wars-everywhere, dictatorial, totalitarian left that we see now, the Marxist left.
	As I said, the Democrats have become Marxists.
	And the Republicans have become Democrats.
	But it was kind of interesting to watch him.
	He was married to Marlo Thomas, got married the same year as Karen and I, 1980.
	But he had a show for 29 years.
	And he did about 7,000 one-hour shows.
	So I'm about to catch him.
	Well, we got our anniversary is coming up tomorrow of the show.
	And so I do three hours a day.
	So I'm getting close to catching up with him.
	But the thing that I thought was most interesting was the fact that, like Gerald Cilenti, Phil Donahue basically had his career ended on TV. Gerald is still there.
	Of course, he's got Trends Journal, and you can still get that.
	You can even get 10% off using the code NIGHT. There we go.
	Got a plug in. But Gerald was on all the shows until he opposed the Iraq War.
	And so Phil Donnie, who of course had been very successful, you know, 29 years.
	I think he had nine Emmys or something like that that he got.
	He retired and then he came back after seven years of retirement.
	He came back to MSNBC. And he came back in 2002.
	And then as Wikipedia says, on February 25, 2003, MSNBC canceled the show.
	Soon after the show's cancellation, an internal MSNBC memo was leaked to the press, stating that Donahue should be fired because he opposed the imminent U.S. invasion of Iraq.
	And that would be, quote, a difficult public face for NBC in a time of war.
	His program, they said, could be, quote, a home for the liberal anti-war agenda, unquote.
	Donohue come in 2007 with the management of MSNBC, owned by the time by General Electric, and I have a clip of him talking to Democracy Now!
	Again, a leftist organization, and that was where he was.
	But he was at least, unlike Lala Harris and Biden and Obama, at least the left in those days was anti-war.
	And for the longest time, we've had the media...
	As exercised censorship control to purge anybody that they disagree with.
	Anybody that opposes the main thrust of their agendas.
	And that's true whether or not you're talking about the war in Iraq or Afghanistan.
	Or whether you're talking about the war, the global war of all governments against their own people.
	In 2020. But here's Phil Donahue, as he talked about when he was fired.
	Well, I think what happened to me, the biggest lesson, I think, is how corporate media shapes our opinions and our coverage.
	This was a decision, my decision, the decision to release me came from far above.
	This was not an assistant program director who decided to Separate me from MSNBC. They were terrified of the anti-war voice, and that is not an overstatement.
	Anti-war voices were not popular.
	And if you're General Electric, you certainly don't want an anti-war voice on a cable channel that you own.
	Donald Rumsfeld is your biggest customer.
	So, by the way, I had to have two conservatives on for every liberal.
	I could have Richard Pearl on a loan, but I couldn't have Dennis Kucinich on a loan.
	I was considered two liberals.
	It really is funny almost when you look back on how the management was just frozen by the anti-war voice.
	We were scolds. We weren't patriotic.
	American people disagreed with us.
	And we weren't good for business.
	He was disinfo, misinfo, malinfo, a traitor.
	He worked for Russia, of course, right?
	That's the stuff we hear today.
	Just let it roll off your back, folks.
	You know what is true. Say what's true.
	Don't care what they say about you.
	But, you know, here's the blind spot that he has.
	Corporate media. No, it wasn't just corporate media.
	It was fascism.
	An overused word today, and one that they misuse significantly.
	Fascism is the merger of corporations and government, and that's really what was at work there.
	The merger of corporations and government.
	Operation Mockingbird.
	As a matter of fact, if you go back and you look at it, it's an excellent video.
	I actually saw it when I got onto Twitter yesterday to post yesterday's show.
	Somebody had reposted McDonald, who was with the John Burr Society, who was a Democrat congressman who was killed shortly after that.
	He was on a show with Pat Buchanan, and this guy, who was not just any CIA guy, It was the guy who ran Operation Mockingbird, and it was shortly after that, he handled that guy really well.
	All the guy did was just call him a conspiracy theorist, you're crazy, you know, the corporations would never do this, and the politicians would never do that, and so forth.
	And it wasn't long after that, McDonald went down on that plane.
	But it's not just corporate media.
	The left, like Phil Donahue, a classic left, always sees corporations as a source of all evil.
	And the right always sees government as a source of all evil.
	And they're both right and they're both wrong.
	Because both of these evil institutions, when taken to extremes, merge.
	And so what we have today is a merger of the very worst aspects of business and the very worst aspects of government.
	We don't have a free market.
	We don't have a competitive market.
	They work together to make sure they've got a monopoly.
	They work together to make sure that they shut down our speech.
	Interesting that, you know, he was quite feeble and old.
	He really didn't get involved in all the social media takedown.
	But he did have a lot of interesting guests.
	And like I said, even though he had a very clear personal bias, he would talk to people who were different than him.
	He had on Milton Friedman, for example.
	He had on Ayn Rand.
	And I wanted to play for you just a little bit of the back and forth between Phil Donahue and Ayn Rand.
	You don't go for altruism and charity and do good and liberal and...
	No. And conservative.
	You might as well add it all.
	You don't like the conservatives either?
	No. Lots of days conservatives.
	I want to help people.
	I want to do good for other people.
	What's so bad about that? Nothing.
	If you do it by your own choice, and if it's not your primary aim in life, and if you don't regard it as a moral virtue.
	In those conditions, it's fine to help people if you want to.
	Why can't I think of it as a moral virtue?
	I mean, can't I take some vows for myself for doing all these good things?
	Because that would be cannibalism.
	Because that would mean that you preach.
	Altruism, which means not merely kindness, but self-sacrifice.
	It means that you place the welfare of others above your own.
	That you live for others, for the sake of helping them, and that justifies your life.
	That's immoral, according to my morality.
	I don't understand why you have to be so harsh in your evaluation of those people.
	Why call it immoral?
	Why don't you just say, Why did you say it's a waste of time?
	Why pass judgment on me?
	Because look at the state of the world today.
	Yeah. And you cannot be harsh enough on those who created it.
	And those who created it are the philosophers of altruism.
	It's those who preach self-sacrifice, selflessness, self-abnegation, all the anti-self Yeah, so I don't know that we have a world that is focused on putting the good of other people ahead of yourself.
	Do you think we have that problem? In the last days, people will be lovers of self.
	And as a matter of fact, you know, this whole idea, greed is good, that you saw in the movie Wall Street and that type of thing, and greed is not good.
	And it is a good thing to put the needs of other people ahead of yourself.
	To love your neighbor as you love yourself.
	And so, as far as she's concerned, Christ is immoral.
	Because it was a life of self-sacrifice and serving others.
	And... That's what he tells us to do.
	Look, if you even have a free market system, and of course we don't have a free market system.
	We have a crony capitalist system.
	But if you have a free market system, and at the purest level of free market, it would be the mom and pop stores in a situation where, you know, you've got something that is kind of new, hasn't been around for a while.
	We kind of found ourselves in that situation with the video stores.
	This is something new, and the big Wall Street companies did not come in yet.
	Eventually they did with Blockbuster and other things like that.
	But at the beginning, it was a pure competition between a lot of different mom and pops.
	How do you succeed in that?
	Well, you put your customer first.
	That means you put their interest ahead of yours.
	And then you find that when you are focused on serving other people, Then things come back.
	But now people are focused not on serving other customers.
	I mean, look at the contempt that corporations have for their own customers.
	Look at Bud Light or look at NASCAR, whatever.
	They absolutely hate their customers.
	They know what their demographics are.
	And they shove it in their face.
	Things that their demographic is going to find extremely offensive.
	And so, the reality is that they have always, you know, if we look at greed and selfishness, they're not virtues.
	And yet, she wrote a book called The Virtue of Selfishness.
	It was actually a collection of essays from her and her philosophy.
	This is why, you know, I call myself libertarian.
	I like a lot of things from the libertarian philosophy that are about liberty.
	But the libertarians themselves, the small L libertarians, many of them are caught up in objectivism, which is a philosophy that I absolutely reject.
	It is not objective.
	It is subjective.
	It celebrates greed.
	It celebrates selfishness.
	It puts ego as the code of ethics, according to her.
	And she sought to destroy all altruism.
	You know, Jesus said to his disciples, when he said to him, who will be the greatest?
	And he said, well, that's not the way, that's the way the Gentile nations organize themselves.
	That's not the way it is to be to you.
	The greater view should serve the lesser.
	That's what I said. That was the ethics of our Christian government.
	At least, you know, when we talk about government servants, that was the idea.
	That they would see themselves as servants, not as somebody that is there to fulfill their own personal ambition and their own greed and their own ego, which is what we've got.
	How do you like politicians like that?
	Because that's all we've got left now, right?
	Pretty much to the top. We take a look at Biden or Lala or Trump.
	That's what we've got, isn't it?
	And so part of her cult there of objectivism was Alan Greenspan.
	And when we look at what has happened with selfishness, just look at how this has been embraced, even to the extent that we don't pay any attention to even the self-sacrifice of family.
	As a matter of fact, it's gotten to such ridiculous extremes, and it's especially true with women who are leaving the church in record numbers, they say.
	It used to be that Men, when they would get into youth, they would walk away from the church, but the women would stay.
	It's just the opposite now. It's just collapsing.
	And they don't want kids.
	They don't want to get married. They don't want to have kids.
	It's all about me, me, me.
	Even to the extent that those who do have kids in the UK, 25% of them, Are sending their kids to start school.
	Now, this is kindergarten. I don't know how early they started, but they're sending their kids, 25% of them are sending their kids, and they're not even potty trained.
	They don't even bother to train them to use the toilet.
	Which makes your job a little bit easier, doesn't it?
	I mean, why would you do that?
	Why would you just say, well, it's all about your own personal ambitions or whatever.
	And, you know, people feel that they need to have everybody working so they can pay the taxes for the government.
	That's the big lie that the government sells you.
	The ideas of career and independence and it's all about me.
	They don't even want to train their kids.
	And of course it may be that they're sending them off at an extremely early age.
	That's a problem in itself, isn't it?
	I don't want to deal with them.
	I've got my own things that I've got to do.
	And many of them feel hard-pressed to do it.
	Because they feel like they've got to do it to make ends meet.
	Because they've been sold a bill of goods.
	Well, when we look at selfishness and greed, I think we do have a society that is built around that.
	And around sexual gratification.
	I think that pretty much sums it up, doesn't it?
	You know, I've played this before.
	This is a video that's really aged pretty well.
	I did this back in 2008 or 2009.
	You know, 15, 16 years ago.
	And there was the Ayn Rand Institute had a competition about Atlas Shrugged to celebrate it with some anniversary that it had.
	And So they had a competition.
	And so I did this video as part of the competition.
	Because I thought, yeah, I understand.
	I don't like Atlas Shrugged, and I don't like objectivism.
	I don't like selfishness and greed.
	They're not virtues. But I understand the free market aspects of it.
	So I thought, well, I can...
	I can do that part of it.
	I understood the idea that government is going to take over and direct industry, which I certainly disagree with.
	So I thought, well, I can do something on those things.
	And as I said, it's aged pretty well.
	I said 2030 was when everything was going to come apart.
	And we kind of look at it backwards from the economic standpoint.
	Because yes, you should not take out of the mouth of labor the bread that it has earned.
	And that's what these Marxists and socialists did.
	So here's the little thing that I did about Ayn Rand and Atlas Shrugged about 15, 16 years ago.
	I remember America.
	Sure, you can still find it on a map, but nobody older than 20 thinks this is America.
	Even if coordinates are the same, we've lost our compass.
	You don't have a direction without reference, the true north.
	For America, it was liberty.
	When we lost the love of liberty, our understanding of liberty.
	It was just a matter of time before the rest of it was lost.
	Some think it started when the auto companies were nationalized, or the police state to control the internet, or when certain companies couldn't fail because their relationship with politicians made them too big to fail, and the rest of us, without political influence, were too small to succeed.
	Sure, that all happened pretty quickly, over just a couple of years, but liberty had been gradually devolving for decades.
	Some of them were astute, like Ayn Rand, and saw it about 50 years before others.
	She warned us, but people didn't believe it could happen here until it did.
	Laws had been used to loot productive individuals and businesses, but in the new millennium, under Bush, then Obama, wrath, corruption, and crony capitalism were no longer hidden behind closed doors.
	The looters and their laws came out of hiding like rabid animals that were no longer afraid of humans.
	It was brought into the spotlight, and it was celebrated as enlightened economic policy.
	Ayn Rand asked a question in Atlas Shrugged that the rest of us were asking 60 years later.
	Which failing financial institution will the administration pluck from the flames of crisis, and which will it let roast?
	Which market or investment technique will the regulators bless, and which, in a capricious change of rules, will it condemn or outlaw?
	As John Galt said in his radio address, You decided you had a right to your wages, but we had no right to our profits.
	You called it selfish Fiction can be a powerful influence for good or bad.
	It's too bad more people didn't read Atlas Shrugged.
	They might have realized where this was heading.
	Well, and of course, the politics is downstream from the spiritual.
	And if you focus your world on selfishness and greed, it's going to be those kind of people who are going to take over the government and use it as a weapon.
	As I was just saying, the intervention to help parents with toilet training in the UK, one in four kids starting school in September without being toilet trained.
	Because it's all about me.
	I can't even bother to do that.
	Pupils on average are losing a third of their learning time each day due to teachers diverting away from teaching and towards supporting children who are not school ready.
	Yeah, maybe they are a little bit too early.
	We do know that there are some children who can't be toilet trained for medical reasons.
	I think that was the case when I was in third grade.
	We had the Cuban Missile Crisis.
	A little bump in the road.
	Very memorable when you're that age.
	Very impressionable. And we all had to take, even though I could walk home in about five minutes, we all had to take a change of clothes with us in case there was a nuclear war.
	And they weren't hazmat suits either.
	It was just like a second set of pants.
	And I remember this one kid wetting his pants and was like, what?
	You know? He had to use his Cuban Missile Crisis pants to...
	I think he had a problem.
	Of course, kids did not realize that at the time.
	So they've actually got a charity to help people, and again, not to help people, but to train the kids for the parents, because the parents can't do anything for themselves.
	So a charity has launched a summer campaign all aboard the toilet train.
	Thomas the Toilet Tank, I guess, is going to be featured on there.
	Because marriage won't do it for their kids.
	They won't train their kids. They've got to have somebody else do it for them.
	We're becoming completely helpless, aren't we?
	As more and more we focus on ourselves, the more and more helpless we become.
	It's really important that children and families are given support to make this happen a little bit earlier.
	So when they start school, they're ready for their learning.
	So they can make friends and they can engage and they can develop to the next stages.
	You know, when we went to China, we were warned by our friends who had adopted twice from there.
	And things are starting to rapidly change.
	So we really didn't see that too much.
	But I said, you're going to see... They don't put pants or diapers or anything on their kids.
	They just let them walk around and drop their load along the road and go away contented.
	But that was starting to end when we went there.
	But as I thought about that, and I thought about this, it's kind of, you know, if you don't have any freedom in your life, And if you don't take responsibility for others, then you kind of just become passive.
	And that's what all this universal basic income and artificial intelligence is really about.
	It's really about pacifying us.
	We're not given any work or responsibility.
	We don't even take responsibility for our kids.
	We don't even want to bother changing their diapers.
	Just don't put pants on them.
	Just let them walk down the street bottomless or whatever.
	But... When you look at how passive we've become, an article from, this is from Yahoo, fragile GPS is a massive vulnerability for the West, and Putin knows it. Oh, let's put it in a Russian context here.
	And they said, what would happen if we lost control of time?
	It's like, what? Yeah, time and position is a GPS stuff.
	But think about that. Think about how dependent we've become on it.
	How we don't really, we just pull out the map app and it takes us to where we want to go.
	We don't try to figure it out ourselves or refer to a map or anything like that.
	And so it is a kind of dependency that they put us on.
	You go back years ago and they would talk about taxi drivers in London.
	London is this hodgepodge of short little streets that all have different names.
	It's just evolved over the centuries.
	And so you don't have, you know, numbered streets that are like, they've all got individual names.
	And sometimes it's a very short street and now it connects up to another street and it immediately changes names.
	It gets very complicated. So these taxi drivers would have to do what they called the knowledge.
	And they would ride around for a very long time.
	On bicycles and memorize all these, this complicated map of London.
	And they would have to have somebody in the car with them in order to get their taxi license.
	Somebody would say, take me to such and such a place.
	And they'd have to be able to do that from memory without consulting anything.
	And so they said that when they looked, everybody was impressed with their detailed ability to do that before GPS. And they would look at their...
	Actually, some people looked at their brains and found that one part of their brain, I forget which part it was, was much larger than it was in other people.
	They were able to train that.
	But like a muscle.
	And if we don't use it, it atrophies.
	And that's what this is about. The fragile GPS. How we become so totally dependent on this complicated infrastructure.
	We've become, like H.G. Wells' time machine, we have become the Eloy of the future.
	These helpless little things that are out there.
	Built by the U.S. military to guide missiles precisely, but opened up for civilian use two decades ago.
	And they said, without this accurate timing, the energy grid would falter and collapse.
	How did we do that before?
	How did we have a power grid that was more reliable and wasn't concerned about shortages?
	Yeah, we didn't have GPS. We had a power grid that you could trust.
	As a system needs to balance volatile renewables, this says.
	Yeah, they're constantly changing.
	Constantly varying.
	And it needs to maintain a constant frequency.
	So again, we have the ones that have become fragile.
	It's not GPS. This is coming out of the UK as Admiral West.
	Lord West of Spithead.
	That's not a joke. I mean, that is...
	When the spit hits the fan, I guess.
	That's what we're talking about if the GPS goes down.
	Lord Spithead.
	Explained to Westminster two years ago.
	The impact of the loss of PNT is almost existential.
	Banking, trade, transactions, all areas of transport and food supply would all be affected in incomplete chaos.
	These are the people who had set up Greenwich Mean Time.
	If you've ever been to Greenwich, the museum that is there, it's very interesting.
	They have the Zero Meridian line.
	You can straddle that.
	It's all about clocks.
	And when the British were ruling the waves and had the big maritime power, Greenwich, the exhibit that was there at least when we went there 44 years ago, I don't know what's there now, It was probably, they've dumbed it down. Nobody knows.
	What's that? Oh, that's an analog clock.
	Have you ever seen one of those before? But they had this big competition about how they were going to tell time on a ship.
	Because, you know, the ship is rolling and pitching and all this other kind of stuff.
	And most of their clocks use pendulums.
	It became a big issue and a big competition.
	They wound up stealing it from the person who won the design.
	But that's another story.
	And so, you know, it was not only the pitch and everything, you know, the movement of the ship, but it was also the harsh environment.
	A lot of humidity and all the rest of this stuff, you know, the sea is out there on the sea.
	These are wooden ships.
	It's always, people have been able to overcome these types of difficulties, and yet we have become Eloy, haven't we?
	They said the strength of those signals...
	It's less than some of the cosmic signals coming from the stars.
	They can therefore be intercepted and adjusted very easily.
	The Chinese and the Russians have already done this.
	So just intercept those things and broadcast something a little bit stronger.
	Imitation of that. Get people confused.
	So they said Russia is probing the spectrum.
	Well, this article itself may be probing the public.
	It may be predictive programming.
	There could be outside threats, and there are outside threats, and of course, The Russians and the Chinese, if we're going to provoke a war, yeah, they would be involved in that as well.
	But of course, our own government is not above provoking a war with us, so it could be predictive programming about that.
	It's just another one of these threats, like EMP, or like a cyber attack, or even our own government shutting down the power on the grid.
	It could be a cyber attack or it could be direct sabotage of people coming through the open borders.
	Very simple, very easy.
	By the way, it's another reason to look at CivilDefenseManual.com.
	I had Jack Lawson on on Friday.
	You can go to that website, CivilDefenseManual.com.
	You can see some of the things that he has there.
	He's got some chapters there for free.
	One on water. Very critical.
	And that is the sort of thing that...
	Really, you need to think about these things.
	Because the government's not going to protect you against any of this stuff.
	They're not going to do anything about EMP. They're not going to do anything about an attack on GPS or the fragile supply chain that we have.
	They're not going to do anything to protect us against direct sabotage or cyber attack or any of this stuff.
	So, again, you need to be aware of these threats and to take some preparatory action on it.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to continue with the news, and I want to get into the DNC, DNC, I guess, their celebration of, you know, who would have thought?
	It was an interesting comment from LifeSite News.
	Who would have thought, just a few years ago, that the Democrats would have made as their central issue the murder of children?
	You know, even Bill Clinton.
	Had enough decency, tried to run from it, you know, but not anymore.
	That's now the thing that they celebrate.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Music You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, we find out that at the Trump rally, the shooting that happened there, one man killed two people.
	I haven't heard any follow-up on the two people that were shot.
	The initial word was that they were critically injured.
	But, of course, they don't matter.
	This is only Trump.
	The speculation about what happened, did it come from, the Republicans say, well, this was set up By the Biden administration, they allowed it to happen or they attempted this.
	The Democrats will say Trump set this up himself.
	You know, again, everything is going to be focused on these two types of things.
	Ready to go to war with each other.
	Well, it was a local cop, not a Secret Service agent, who shot the person on the roof first.
	Wounded him, and they said that the kill shot was given to the Secret Service sniper, counter-sniper, but that the initial shot that stopped him was done by a local SWAT operator, they call him. They call him an operator.
	And that he also hit his gun, you know, like in the westerns where they hit the gun.
	Knock it out of the guy's hand.
	Maybe that's true. I don't know.
	I'm not really buying any of this stuff one way or the other.
	I don't know what happened.
	I'm just looking to see how they're going to use it.
	Perhaps the Secret Service agent that was supposed to be doing this was actually somewhere chest-feeding a baby.
	They had a Secret Service agent who was nursing a baby at the Trump campaign event.
	North Carolina? Because, you know, that's...
	Moms...
	You've got moms now protecting politicians.
	Isn't this kind of upside down and backwards?
	I thought we were supposed to have politicians kissing babies, not having their nursing moms out there using their bodies as shields for a president.
	What? I mean, this is...
	You know, part of this is like, you look at it and it's like, yeah, okay, this is...
	This is in confidence.
	They've also had agents caught sleeping on the job at Mar-a-Lago.
	And Director Kim Cheadle, former director, wanted to have 30% of the Secret Service be women by 2030.
	And yet, you know, when you look at this, it's kind of like the boxing thing, as I said.
	It's repulsive.
	To see a man who is, you know, chemically, genetically a man, see a person like that beating up a woman as part of sports.
	And yet, the other question is, why do they have women beating up women?
	It's just, I don't know, I'm kind of old school.
	Why do we have women, especially a woman who's got a young baby and needs to be nursing it, why is she being used as a bodyguard for a man?
	Well, let's take a look at what is going on with the DNC. We had Biden on the first night, and a lot of people were saying, well, that was a sign of disrespect.
	The Republican press is doing everything it can to...
	Show that it is a failure.
	And it's pretty easy, actually.
	It's a low bar to be able to show that it's a failure.
	But the Democrat press is talking about how wonderful a love fest it is and everything.
	The Republicans point out that they had him on the very first night, which is a very low position, and that they didn't even have anybody go over his biography.
	He had to do it himself.
	And it was a pretty difficult thing for him, actually.
	He struggled. Here is Biden talking about women and power.
	And he gets the whole power thing mixed up as to which power he's talking about.
	Quote, women are not without electoral or political power.
	Please clap.
	No kidding.
	No kidding. Yeah, women don't have any power.
	Let's fix that. Let's elect her.
	It's so important. All these people from Hollywood, it's so important that we get a woman in.
	Why? Why does that make any difference?
	I mean, you know. Anyway, yeah, electrical power.
	He's so focused on taking electrical power away from people.
	Is that what it was? Is that kind of like a Freudian slip?
	He did that at one point, and he started talking about, it's going to be a dark winter!
	And is that a Freudian slip?
	Is he referring back to the first germ game?
	When he was talking about locking everybody down?
	Well, you just can't criticize the didn't earn it, DEI stuff.
	Because people are weaponizing racist, sexist, and all the rest of the stuff to such a degree.
	You have a Vanderbilt...
	Professor. A professor of black studies.
	Is that racist? Who calls a GOP congresswoman racist because of the way that she pronounces Lala's name.
	You know, there's a lot of different pronunciations.
	You can call her Commie Law or just Lala.
	But, you know, they demand that you call her Comma Law.
	Commie Law. And...
	They don't like it.
	If you call her Kamala, well, how is that racist?
	Vanderbilt African American Studies professor Michael Dyson said that Nancy Grace was being disrespectful and racist by mispronouncing her name.
	She is a congresswoman from South Carolina.
	He said, you are part of the, quote, legacy of white disregard for the humanity of black people.
	For saying Kamala instead of Kamala.
	Kamilala. Kamilala.
	So Kamila.
	Kamilala. Or just simply Lala.
	Oh well.
	La-dee-da. La-dee-da.
	Space cadet. Lala.
	So May subsequently was called disrespectful with Dyson adding, we don't call you Nancy Machi.
	Her name is Mace.
	But isn't Camila, isn't that a made-up name?
	I don't know. I've never heard of anybody else with that name.
	He says, I know you don't intend it to be that way.
	That's the history and the legacy of white disregard for the humanity of black people, he said.
	And she said, oh, so now you're calling me a racist.
	That's BS. That's complete BS. And he responded, you don't have to intend racism to To accomplish it.
	To be guilty of it.
	Your disrespect of Kami Lala is part of a tradition of disrespect.
	You see, what he's talking about here is the idea of unconscious bias.
	By your very white skin, you are unconsciously biased.
	You're evil because of your skin color, you see.
	And this is this unconscious bias that It's a way that they can attack you.
	It's kind of a passive-aggressive way of attacking people.
	Well, I know you don't intend it, and I know that you don't even think that, but you're that, nevertheless.
	You're racist. Even though you harbor no ill will or prejudice against people, you're still racist because you're white.
	That's what they've been selling with the unconscious bias.
	Later in the clip, Dyson insists that Mace pronounce Kami Lala's name And when she doesn't, the panel in unison shouts, communist lala, communist lala.
	No, actually, it's something similar to that.
	Said, you're doing this on purpose, aren't you, Congresswoman?
	Well, she may or may not have been doing it on purpose.
	I do it on purpose. You go back and you look at George H.W. Bush, right?
	He's coming after Saddam Hussein.
	He called him Saddam instead of Saddam, right?
	And he did that as an intentional dig, many people said.
	And I believe that he did.
	He didn't call him Saddam.
	He called him Sodom.
	The professor then challenged Mace to pronounce her name correctly after she did not.
	He said, you're a white woman disrespecting a black woman.
	You're a bad person.
	I'm going to wish you into the cornfield.
	We live in that twilight zone, don't we?
	Well, here's the deal.
	As Shakespeare said, a communist by any other name is still red.
	292-page report shows that Biden has committed impeachable offenses.
	Maybe they could have shortened it a little bit and gotten it out on time.
	It's like years late, okay?
	We knew this before the 2020 election.
	And I said, they've waited too long.
	They would think that they're going to throw this thing out.
	There's an October surprise.
	People aren't going to, with the media pushed against them, they dropped all the stuff about the Hunter Biden laptop and all the rest of the stuff.
	They thought they had the Democrats.
	I said, you waited too long.
	And they underestimated, as George W. Bush would say, they The loyalty and the power of the mainstream media to bury it, to push back against it.
	We knew about that long, long before.
	And in the summer, I was still saying, when are they going to release this stuff about the Biden corruption?
	And they didn't.
	They didn't do that until October.
	Well, this is a 292-page report about all the impeachable offenses of Biden.
	Biden. So what are they going to do about it?
	Are the Republicans going to impeach Biden and remove him so they can make Lala president?
	I don't know that they want to do that.
	And, you know, because it's all about the election at this point.
	Were the impeachable offenses that everybody knew about, was this the leverage that the Democrats were using against him?
	They might have done it with a hard leverage.
	They might have said, you step down and we're going to expose everything that we know about you.
	He's blackmailable, right?
	That's one of the things that they're always looking for with politicians.
	You know, people like Dennis Hastert, who was a known pedophile, wrestling coach in high school.
	They put him in Congress because he's blackmailable.
	They put him as Speaker of the House because he's blackmailable.
	They kept him as the longest Speaker of the House for the Republicans because he was blackmailable.
	Well, Biden was blackmailable and controlled.
	And so they could tell him, all right, now it's time for you to step down.
	He has to do it. But it could have been a soft.
	They could have presented to him in a soft way.
	If you don't step down, we're going to lose our majority in Congress.
	And Trump will get elected.
	Look at where you are in the polls.
	And Trump's going to put you in jail.
	So you better step down and let us pick who we think is going to win.
	I think that really was the situation.
	And so the question is, are they going to have him step down?
	I don't think that they will do the 25th Amendment.
	Some people are talking about that.
	You've already got the New York Times talking about how this was a coup.
	If the Democrats were to come out and force him out of the Oval Office for Lala, I think that would be a step too far even for the Democrats, because already, like I said, the New York Times is saying it was a coup.
	So will the Republicans do that?
	I think it would be to their disadvantage.
	So, when you...
	This article from Breitbart...
	House Speaker Mike Johnson must now determine if he should take action on the report's findings.
	If Johnson launches House impeachment proceedings, it would throw a new wrinkle into the presidential election cycle by forcing Democrats and Vice President Lala to spend time and energy defending an outgoing president.
	They wouldn't do that.
	As President Biden and the Biden-Harris administration obstructed the House's impeachment inquiry and the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, according to the report.
	Well, look, attacking Biden isn't going to harm Lala at all.
	And I think it'll backfire on the Republicans if they were to do something like that.
	I think it'll backfire on public opinion, and I think putting her in the presidency would backfire on them as well.
	And everybody knows all this stuff.
	It isn't like this is going to be some new revelation.
	I mean, the bottom line is, most of us knew who follow politics.
	Most of us knew about the Hunter-Biden corruption and the Biden corruption.
	I mean, it was an open story about Biden saying, yeah, you know, I told them to get rid of that prosecutor and that type of thing.
	So we knew about all that stuff and have been talking about the connections of Biden and Obama and the DNC. To the corrupt people in Ukraine, as well as to China and all the rest of the stuff.
	So that isn't going to buy them anything.
	The key thing, I think, and it truly is amazing to find ourselves there, is the fact that this has all been about the celebration of abortion.
	To the extent that Babylon Bee actually did this picture here.
	The DNC dies the Chicago River Red in order to celebrate abortion.
	Well, that's pretty true.
	They would if they could, wouldn't they?
	I mean, they have died, I think, on St.
	Patrick's Day. They have a lot of Irish people, used to anyway, in Chicago.
	And so they had big St. Patrick's Day and they would dump green dye.
	But it was never as thorough as this photoshopped picture here.
	The decision was made to turn the river blood-colored for the party's convention as a striking visual to emphasize the Democrats' unending commitment to slaughtering defenseless babies in as large quantities as possible, writes the Babylon Bee.
	Quote, turning the Chicago River blood-red is the perfect way to celebrate our party's national convention and remind everyone just how excited we get about killing babies, said the DNC chair.
	We're just bummed that we couldn't use actual baby blood.
	So keep killing those babies, folks.
	Officials say the Red Chicago River would not only show the party's enthusiasm for baby murder, but also serve as a visual preview of the tidal wave of communism the party would seek to usher in if Kami Lala is elected.
	We're all about the red, said Kami.
	The blood of innocent children and unbridled communism.
	Bring on the red.
	That's a A pet peeve of mine.
	All these people who wear red caps and wear red states and wear red this and wear red that.
	To me, that just underscores how absolutely clueless the MAGA and Republican base is about history, about communism, about the power of the media.
	They accept any label that is put on them, and they have absolutely no historical context.
	For any of the issues or the political parties or any of this stuff.
	They don't understand how they're being played.
	Totally clueless. Walking around in their communist caps.
	Democrats still might invoke the 25th Amendment to make Harris president says the Hill.
	I don't think that's going to happen.
	I really don't. I think that is way too far.
	Many now view President Biden as a broken man.
	Walking alone in a deep valley of depression, confusion, and anger, says the Hill.
	It's been that way for a long time.
	Because, you see, the one legacy that is important of the Biden administration is to start explaining to people, even Joe Rogan can see that the idea of a president who is quote-unquote running the country is pure myth.
	He's not running anything.
	There are people who are running him.
	He's just a marketing puppet.
	A guy up front. And so we had Harris' campaign.
	It's now requiring everybody who works for her to get a COVID shot.
	Even though we know they don't work.
	We know we don't have COVID. We know how dangerous they are.
	She's still demanding this.
	That is, assuming that you can get a job with her if you can work out what your pronouns are.
	Remember, she's got nine different pronoun groups that you can choose, and if that's not enough, you can write in your own made-up pronouns.
	And then, if you're that stupid to work for her, she's going to inject you as well.
	Harris for President requires all employees to be up to date on COVID-19 vaccination status as prescribed by the CDC as a condition of employment unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law, says her campaign website.
	Well, you know, we do have the Bill of Rights and other things like that that should apply.
	But, of course, it never really applied with her.
	Remember when you had mainstream media reporters begging her for her and Biden to put in a vaccine passport?
	Well, they got it in France!
	Speaking of global health, we're all wearing masks in this room, except for you.
	The French, which is fine, the French essentially have a vaccine passport that has allowed public life here to return to some semblance of normalcy.
	What's normal about France?
	Should the United States have such a requirement?
	We have, as you know, been very careful to guide public policy where it is our role to guide it based on what the scientists and medical professionals tell us.
	And we are also leaving it, as you know, to local communities in large part to make those decisions.
	I think the most important thing at this moment for us in the United States to focus on is that we now have the ability for children to get The vaccination, the shot.
	We have at our disposal the ability to actually engage in smart public health conduct and protocols.
	And we have free, safe vaccines available for everyone.
	And our biggest challenge right now is to urge everyone to engage in saving their life and the life of Yeah, well, you know, we can't be as good as the French, of course.
	Everybody looks to the French for freedom and sanity, right?
	But you notice what she had to say there.
	Well, it is our role to guide public policy.
	No, it isn't.
	It's not your role to guide public policy about health at all.
	Based on science?
	No. Based on these institutions that say that they represent science.
	And the other thing I want to point out to you, leaving it in large part to local people, right?
	That was a plan. That was a plan from day one.
	That was a plan when they practiced all this stuff two months before 9-11.
	One week after 9-11.
	The anthrax attack, and then two months later, they put out the model legislation to all the states.
	Why? Because they don't have the authority to dictate this to people.
	They can pay state and local government to do whatever they want.
	And we've seen this when you look at putting the boys in the girls' bathrooms or any other policy that they want to dictate.
	They do it by funding it.
	They do it by enticement and by bribery.
	And that was what Trump was doing as well.
	That's the way this thing rolls out.
	And so, yeah, all about the vaccine passports.
	Well, we will do it in the American way.
	What we do is we don't mandate that.
	We pay local places to engage the tyranny on you.
	We pay them to punish you.
	That's why I say, if you think that your vote, get all tied up about what's going on with the presidential race.
	This is a myth, folks.
	And you can focus all of your energy on Trump versus Lala.
	And you're going to be in a bad way when whatever is being bribed out of Washington comes to the local level.
	You better have some officials at the local level who are not going to take the bribe.
	Who understand that they don't want a society like that.
	Who are going to stand in the gap.
	And we saw that happening in 2020.
	Standing against the bribery of the Trump administration.
	Standing against the guidance of science from the Trump administration.
	Yes, get involved in politics to protect yourself and your family.
	But do it at the local level.
	You're not going to have... You think that your money that you're sending to help...
	If you're going to send money in, you think that's going to have an effect?
	With all these billionaires lined up and buying their place at the table?
	You now got Trump saying, well, maybe I'll put Musk in and give him a cabinet position.
	And he says, oh, I'd love to do that.
	We set it up as the Department of Government Efficiency.
	As a joke, and he puts it as D-O-G-E, Doge, like the Doge coin, right?
	Which he's joked about.
	But look, if he got in to politics anymore, I think that is ultimately his ambition to get in in some way or form.
	He doesn't want to waste his time being a congressman or a senator or anything like that.
	But, you know, He can pull the strings on these politicians.
	As H.L. Mencken said, every election is an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	Who's stealing the stuff?
	It's the billionaires. They buy a place at the table.
	They get their tax breaks.
	They get their subsidies.
	They get their government contracts.
	They get the government to leave them alone to do what they want.
	All these different things that are happening.
	And of course, Musk is the king of crony capitalism.
	He became the world's richest man by operating that system.
	And so, folks, you're not going to have any effect whatsoever on the race.
	And Musk even had the candor to tell people Soros is getting focused on local elections because even Soros doesn't have that much leverage at the federal level.
	So if he really wants to have societal change, Soros is going to do it by putting in district attorneys who are going to Facilitate lawless chaos by letting criminals out and not prosecuting them.
	That's the plan. And so how do you stop this?
	The place, interestingly enough, and he even said it, he said, you know, at the local level, your vote represents a bigger proportion of things than any other place.
	You know, the closer and more local it gets to you, the Bigger percentage your vote is.
	You still might be one of 20,000 people or something in an area, but that's better than one in 300 million.
	And so you can have an effect there.
	And that's where this is all going to roll out.
	That's where Biden and Trump did it, was at the local level.
	And so this article from LifeSite News talking about, you know, recanting everybody, explaining that, yeah, they're still pushing, still pushing COVID, still pushing the vaccines, pushing it on their employees.
	And they said the CDC is currently recommending for the 2023 to 2024 updated COVID vaccines, they're recommending Pfizer, Moderna, and Novavax.
	And I was reminded yesterday, after I talked about Dr.
	Peter McCullough, and how he was shamelessly pushing the hype and the fear about gain-of-function.
	I see the ads all the time on these conservative sites like Zero Hedge and stuff.
	Pushing fear, and you can stock up your ivermectin now.
	It's like, fine, get ivermectin.
	Sell ivermectin. Like I said yesterday, sell ivermectin.
	Sell people storable food.
	But don't push fear in order to do it.
	Don't tell them, no, there's a real thing to be afraid of.
	You should be afraid of what the government might do.
	But don't be afraid of the vaccines.
	Don't be afraid of the virus.
	Don't be afraid of some weaponized virus.
	Be afraid of the vaccine.
	That is the bioweapon, and that's not what he's done.
	I was reminded yesterday that he pushed Novavax.
	Here's a tweet from October of 2021.
	And this is the C-19 expert group.
	They put this out. Please see these results with Novavax.
	90% efficacy and less than 1% develop a fever after the injection.
	Safety profile looks better than the current vaccines.
	Let me know your thoughts. Well, I think you're a vaccine shill.
	How about that, McCullough? You kind of put that stuff up.
	You haven't done any tests on this stuff.
	You know better than that.
	You know that they didn't really test vaccines ever for sufficiently, even though they used to run the test for years.
	It still wasn't sufficient.
	So they put this thing out. It's like, oh, yeah, look at this.
	You know, we shot a bunch of people and they didn't die immediately.
	So I guess it's safe, right?
	He's pushing that kind of garbage to people.
	And then this, also pushing Molnupirvir.
	These names that the pharmaceutical companies come up with.
	As absurd as their science.
	This is as late as December 24th.
	2022. Christmas Eve.
	Christmas Eve, Peter McCullough is pushing this Molnupirvir.
	And this is something that, of course, has not been tested.
	It's still under emergency use authorization.
	Where is the emergency, Dr.
	McCullough? Come on.
	2022? There never was an emergency.
	And so, he's referring, he says, they deleted Molnupirvir, Minor prednisolone dosing change.
	The WHO and the NIH, after three years, have no multi-drug ambulatory protocol.
	The most critical element of pandemic response.
	He's pushing pandemic fear all the time.
	All the time. Regardless of what he is selling, that is reprehensible.
	To push the lies and the fears about the pandemic.
	There was no pandemic, Dr.
	McCullough. Start telling the truth.
	The CDC's continued warnings against serious COVID infection, along with the controlled opposition and the mainstream alternative media.
	That's the phrase that David Icke used, and he's absolutely right.
	These people have taken, they are absolutely controlled.
	The mainstream alternative media.
	CDC's continued warning against the quote-unquote serious COVID infection contrasts with the description of the virus by on-the-ground doctors as exceedingly mild.
	Dr. Eric Eiding told NBC last fall regarding his urgent care patients.
	He said, quote, just about everyone who I've seen has had really mild symptoms.
	The only way that we knew there was COVID was because we happened to be testing them.
	Yes, an intelligence test.
	If you're going to fall for the PCR, if you're going to fall for the mainstream media, as the meme goes, the Amish don't suffer from the pandemic because they don't have television.
	So the Democrats began the night by celebrating Tim Walz's stolen valor at the DNC. It's absolutely amazing.
	They actually doubled down.
	On his claiming that he retired with a higher rank.
	And he didn't. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	♪♪
	Making sense.
	comment again you're listening to the David night show well we're going to talk a bit more about the DNC and about Tim Walzer's more has come to light about his love of the Chai Kams, the Chinese communists.
	More of that has resurfaced, some amazing things about him and about his stolen valor.
	But before we get into that, I just want to thank real quickly some of the people who sent us checks on the second week of August. I'll just read the first name and last initial.
	Aaron W., David and Debbie W., Mark C., Karen C., Jeremy W., Margaret, Mary T., Martin K., Lloyd P., Patricia W., Joan and David F., Sue K. Thank you all so much.
	I really appreciate it.
	We could not do this without your support.
	That is a key thing for us.
	We don't have sponsors.
	I mean, you know, I think there was a situation where we had a sponsor and I had to disavow them or whatever, you know, like McCullough or something.
	But so it really is your donation that keeps this program going.
	So the Democrats, as I said before we went to the break, are celebrating his stolen valor.
	And I mean, they celebrate it.
	They doubled down. He was introduced...
	At the DNC AAPI caucus meeting as Command Sergeant Major.
	That is a rank above what he retired with.
	The person who announced it even took a minute to make sure when she said it.
	She said, quote, a title that is very important to me, Command Sergeant Major.
	But he never completed the requirements for the rank, and so they dropped him before he retired, a day before he retired.
	But much worse than that is his justification of China's one-child policy.
	Don't tell me that you're all about power for women and you want to stand for women and for women's freedom and all the rest of the stuff when you defend the forced abortions of China.
	When you defend a policy that resulted in what many people termed gender side, the murder of baby girls, or the abandonment of baby girls.
	There was so much adoption of children in China because of the one-child policy.
	And they said, well, we want to have a boy if it's going to be one child.
	And so they abandoned the girls to the orphanages.
	That was a result of this Chinese policy.
	And of course, where did that Chinese policy come from?
	This fear about too many people.
	The depopulation agenda that drives everything.
	The depopulation agenda that drives all of these MacGuffins.
	Whether it's the pandemic MacGuffin or the climate MacGuffin.
	It all ultimately comes back to they want to kill you.
	They want to reduce the population.
	Because it's too hard for them to control us if we outnumber them to such a degree.
	Yeah, they may have a tremendous advantage in terms of weaponry and technology.
	And Hugo de Garris, when he said, well, you know, people figure out what the elites are doing to them.
	They're going to come after them. And the elites are going to use their superior technology.
	He goes, it'll be horrific. You'll have giga death.
	Billions of people killed by the elites.
	But guess what? It's almost, what is it, eight or nine billion people?
	They can't get us all.
	And they know that. So they want to reduce the population down to a size where they could kill us all if we revolted against them.
	That's the simple basis of everything that they're doing.
	And, oh, today is Deb McCartney's birthday.
	Well, happy birthday to you.
	Brian and Deb.
	Happy birthday, Deb. A few years ago, it says LifeSite News, it would have been unthinkable to have abortion be the centerpiece of a presidential campaign, as I said earlier.
	But that's exactly what is happening.
	Just think back. You know, during the Clinton administration, even Bill Clinton was saying, well, we need to refer to abortion.
	We want to make it legal but rare.
	But now they've embraced the right to kill unborn babies.
	And, you know, as this stuff is happening, as they make abortion the centerpiece of the campaign, what are the Republicans saying about it?
	You see much from the Republican press?
	I mean, LifeSite News will talk about it.
	It's a Catholic publication.
	But pretty much, the Republicans don't want to talk about abortion.
	They see it as a losing issue.
	Why? Well, because you can't fight something if you're running away from it.
	You get shot in the back.
	And deservedly so.
	Now, the Republicans, they can talk about Tim Walz running away from his responsibility to go to Iraq.
	But the Republicans are running away from protecting innocent life.
	They don't want to do it.
	Trump and the GOP in general.
	So, Harris and Walls have gone even further.
	They've elevated this so-called right above all others, including the ones that are listed in the Bill of Rights.
	They don't support any freedom.
	Reason got that right, finally.
	I've been saying it for years.
	Democrats don't support any so-called right, except the right to kill your child.
	And they see it now as a religious ceremony.
	R-I-T-E. A woman's most fundamental right, says Lala.
	It trumps freedom of speech, freedom of religion, even freedom of conscience, says LifeSite News.
	And it really does. On Rumble, Michelle Obama, thank you very much.
	She says, a thousand people watching now.
	Awesome. Well, that's great.
	Thank you all. And I appreciate people sharing...
	And liking and sharing the broadcast.
	That's what makes that possible.
	It's really you doing that.
	And it is vital for people to do that.
	So I really do appreciate that.
	So they want to overturn pro-life laws in dozens of states.
	They want to impose their radical views on the entire nation.
	They want to increase funding for Planned Parenthood and, at the same time, shut down crisis pregnancy centers, jail people who are peaceful protesters, grandmothers in wheelchairs, and the rest of the stuff.
	Arrest women in the UK? A woman who was silently praying at one of their sacred child sacrifice sites?
	You want to know what their religion is?
	Pretty easy to tell, isn't it?
	At a time when American birth rates are at historic lows, Lala is still concerned about what she calls population growth.
	It's not growing.
	And thanks to their vaccination...
	Thanks to their mind games and propaganda that they have put on people, the population is shrinking at a time when even China has decided that it wants more, not fewer babies.
	Lala thinks it makes sense for young people to avoid having children because of climate change.
	Well, again, climate change was always about depopulation.
	Always about depopulation.
	Um... One, Tim Waltz, has deep connections to the Chinese Communist Party, writes LifeSite News, and we know that.
	He's an admirer of the Communist regime.
	He's traveled to China 30 times.
	I talked about that the other day.
	But they say that China paid for it.
	He did it on China's dime, says LifeSite News.
	I didn't know that. And the person who was talking about it, you know, again, he made sure that he got local press coverage.
	That he was taking a group of kids to China and that type of thing.
	But he dearly loved China.
	He got married on the anniversary of Tiananmen Square.
	He honeymooned in China, just like I said.
	What is it about all these Democrat Marxists?
	De Blasio honeymoons in Cuba, Bernie Sanders honeymoons in the Soviet Union before communism fell.
	They love it so much.
	Yeah, okay, I love this one, but I'm really married to communism.
	That's why I want to spend my honeymoon in a communist state.
	Cuba, China, Russia.
	So, they actually paid for it.
	China actually paid for its trips.
	This is the very definition of a fellow traveler.
	Well, you know, I can see this happening because...
	The Islamic cultist, Fatala Gulen, from Turkey.
	And he was at one time an ally of Erdogan, and then they became political opponents.
	Fatala Gulen had to leave the country.
	The CIA, well, the State Department was going to block Fatala Gulen from coming to the United States.
	And the CIA wrote letters and got him in.
	And now he's got a compound up in Pennsylvania.
	But he has a series of schools.
	He's got over a thousand schools, well over a thousand schools worldwide.
	Everywhere except in the United States, they are run as religious schools, as madrasas.
	Because he is this, you know, he's an imam, he's a Muslim imam.
	And in the U.S., they call them schools of science and math.
	And there have been a lot of allegations about criminal corruption and other things.
	In terms of the people that they bring in as teachers and what are they really teaching the kids in the schools, part of that is that they give free trips to politicians and free trips to the best and the brightest in their schools to indoctrinate them to love Turkey.
	That's what Tim Walz was doing with China.
	And so, of course, you know, China pays for that.
	The Galenists pay for it.
	And Mark Hall did an excellent documentary.
	Killing Ed. Talking about how the Fatala Gulen cult has been able to use public money, government money, in Texas especially.
	Texas more than anywhere else.
	They have exploited school choice laws there.
	And this organization is getting massive amounts of money Last I saw it years ago, last time I covered it, it was up to about $750 million.
	They're probably over a billion dollars now from Texas so that this Islamic cult can educate kids and call it science and math.
	So unlike Biden, Walls' connections with the communist Chinese is more ideological than financial.
	He truly loves it as a person who went with him as a high school student.
	He said he was, you know, just giddy collecting all the Mao's little red books and all the rest of the other stuff.
	Even more troubling, he was in China during the heyday of China's now-defunct one-child policy, which involved forced and late-term abortions, even infanticide.
	But instead of condemning it, he did everything in his power to justify it.
	The one-child policy was necessary, Walls said, because, quote, the Chinese population was so large.
	So what are they going to do to us?
	You know, they've got their ways.
	They've got their ways to kill us with the injections and other things.
	He also falsely claimed that the only consequence of having more than one child was that, quote, the family pays a tax, unquote.
	It was a ruinous tax, by the way.
	It was more than the annual wage of most of the people in China if you were caught with a child.
	But he just calls it a tax.
	So that tells you something about his tax policy as well, doesn't it?
	If you tax people more than their annual wage as a fine for having too many kids, well, it's just a tax.
	Nothing to worry about. Throughout the time that Walls was making repeated visits to China, women were being hunted down for the crime of being pregnant without permission.
	And they were being taken by force to abortion centers.
	I know, says the writer, because I was there.
	Taking a leaf out of China's book as governor, Walls overturned a Minnesota law that made it a crime to force a woman to get an abortion.
	As governor, he not only endorsed abortion up to birth, he gave free reign to men to coerce women into unwanted abortions when they are most vulnerable emotionally and financially.
	Echoing Pete Buttigieg, Tim Walls thinks that the abortion has been a good thing for men.
	It certainly has enabled some of them to avoid taking responsibility for getting a young woman pregnant.
	Lala and Waltz are, in short, death peddlers, writes Stephen Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, author of The Devil and Communist China.
	Boy, that's a target-rich environment, isn't it, right there?
	He was...
	An American scientist who was allowed to do field work in China, 1979 to 1980.
	He says he witnessed women being forcibly aborted and sterilized under the new one-child policy.
	His groundbreaking reports on these barbaric practices led to his being fired from Stanford University.
	Interesting. You know, we began the program with Phil Donahue being fired for opposing the war.
	Here's the guy who's Fired for exposing the war on children, the war on humanity, the depopulation war, the globalist war on humanity that is now everywhere in all of our countries.
	Folks, that was what 2020 was all about.
	And that's what climate change has been about.
	Even before it rolled out, Paul Ehrlich, one of the founders of this Earth Day garbage, he'd written the population bomb.
	And that's what he was fundamentally about.
	All of them. Whether you're talking about the Bushes and Prescott Bush working with Margaret Singer, they always justified the abortions.
	They justified everything that they do.
	They justify it on the fact that we've got too many people.
	Too many people for them to control.
	This guy, by the way, Stephen Mosher, said when he posed this stuff, he was, before he went to China and saw this, He was a pro-choice atheist.
	But no longer. So, Trump responds to Lala Harris and her economic plan.
	He says, she can't answer how she'd pay for it.
	Well, wait a minute.
	Did he ever answer about how he was going to pay for his $3.5 trillion CARES Act and PPP and all the rest of the stuff during the lockdown?
	No. No, he ramped up the spending and Biden kept it.
	And, yeah, fiscal responsibility.
	It's always a refuge of a political scoundrel, isn't it?
	All these people, as soon as you start talking about a tax cut, oh, we can't afford that.
	And, of course, she doesn't have any way that she's going to pay for her economic plan.
	Of course she doesn't. But did Trump have any way to pay for what he was doing?
	Did he even care to try?
	No, of course he didn't.
	But Breitbart's not going to tell you that.
	Not going to tell you that Trump didn't bother to pay.
	A better way to approach this, better than what Trump did, is what the Washington Post did.
	They called her economic plan a gimmick.
	Trump says, well, she doesn't have any way to pay for it.
	Except he's got a way to pay for his stuff.
	But the Washington Post just calls it a gimmick.
	It is a gimmick. It is a gimmick which will be forgotten by whoever wins the presidency.
	Whichever group. When's the presidency?
	Because, again, these people are puppets out front.
	But a better critique from the Washington Post than from Donald Trump.
	That's how bad this election is going.
	Washington Post characterized it as populist gimmicks.
	And they said it was to blame corporate price gouging rather than addressing the underlying economic challenges.
	You know, the underlying economic challenges like quantitative easing.
	Printing of money, spending, 35 trillion reasons that you could talk about, but they choose not to talk about any of those.
	While the Washington Post is calling out Harris over populist gimmicks, the New York Times, Maureen Dowd, slammed Democrats for executing a coup to remove Biden from the ticket.
	The party's power players have orchestrated a behind-the-scenes coup to push President Biden out of the 2024 race.
	Wow, even the New York Times is finally saying that.
	Maureen Dowd just figured this out?
	Here's the real 40 chess folks.
	The power players who are the real president.
	This collective group of so-called power players.
	And all they're doing is just changing the spokesperson that's out front for the real people who are really running the power.
	The bureaucrats, the intelligence community, the other people there.
	And some of these political operatives.
	But They did a masterful job of orchestrating this.
	I mean, they came up with all this political, ridiculous charges against Trump so that he didn't have to engage in any primaries or any debates.
	He was just anointed. They chose Trump as their opponent.
	And then they chose to move the debate up way before the convention, which has never been done before.
	So they could get rid of Biden.
	They picked Trump and they picked Lala to run against Trump.
	And the people out there who are dressing up in communist colors, the red state people, the red cap MAGA people, are absolutely clueless as to what's going on.
	It truly... You just kind of laugh at how stupid this all is.
	Unrumble. Mad Mim.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	And writes, God bless you and family.
	My normal question is, when will you be interviewing Dr.
	Shiva again? Well, in about 35 minutes.
	He will be our guest.
	We have him scheduled for today, as a matter of fact.
	And so, it was one up on you.
	I didn't announce it at the top of the show, but he will be joining us at the top of the hour.
	Dr. Shiva will. The root cause of inflation.
	What are we going to do about this, right?
	Well, we talked about it the other day.
	The root cause is money creation.
	Always is. So, Meharry, Michael Meharry, talking about it, cited the July budget deficit data showing the Biden administration, whoever they are, we don't know who they are.
	I mean, it's not Joe Biden doing anything.
	Spent another $574 billion in just one month Running a $243 billion deficit.
	In other words, 42% of the money that they spent, they didn't have any way.
	It was borrowed, right?
	They just put it on a credit card.
	That's why I say it's so ridiculous for Trump after what he did.
	And after what they all do.
	Say, well, you didn't got any way to pay for it.
	That's the best you can do?
	He's absolutely clueless.
	Well, here's her personal solution.
	What do we do about the economy?
	People struggling with inflation?
	Do we have price controls on groceries?
	Well, Babylon Bee said, Lala Harris suggests that Americans struggling to make ends meet, just try sleeping with their boss.
	Because it works so well for her.
	So if we examine the passage of time in making ends meet, we can see that the easiest solution is just to try sleeping around with your boss.
	As she cackled.
	It works every time, and there's great significance to the passage of every time.
	Sleeping with your boss is very simple.
	You just sleep with him in order to make ends meet.
	That way your ends will meet.
	There is great significance to making ends meet.
	But the reality is that she really did sleep her way to the top.
	Her sugar daddy...
	That put her in place there.
	Willie Brown. Isn't that interesting that, you know, for all the baseless smears that Trump will throw at people that he doesn't like, that he won't go there with this.
	I guess he figures complaining about somebody sleeping around indiscriminately is kind of like throwing stones in a glass Trump Tower or something.
	You know, you wouldn't He's not going to do that.
	But again, Willie Brown, kingmaker in California.
	He gave her a BMW when she was already in a $100,000 a year job that he had arranged for her, as well as getting her connected into a massive network of rich and powerful people.
	This is all in Peter Schweitzer's book, Profiles in Corruption, Abuse and Power by America's Progressive Elite.
	Her entree into the corridors of political power largely began with a date.
	In 1994, she met Willie Brown, who at the time was the second most powerful man in California politics.
	He was Speaker of the State Assembly.
	And very well connected in Sacramento.
	When he became mayor, well, that's when they met.
	And he elevated her.
	You talk about the people who become super wealthy.
	He retired from political office in 2004.
	Bought a $1.8 million condo in St.
	Regis in San Francisco two years later.
	He was renowned for his penchant for expensive Brioni suits.
	Borsalino hats, Ferraris, and Porsches.
	I don't even know what the suits and the hats are all about.
	I do know the cars.
	He once declared that his body would reject a Plymouth.
	Well, we should try it and see.
	There'd be something to see.
	Maybe we'd have a...
	It'd be like running one of the old Hertz ads where they put you in the driver's seat, running it in reverse.
	We'll take a quick break. We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	https://www.paradisensbrech.edu.au
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	I mentioned earlier in the program a pro-life activist who's been arrested multiple times for silently praying near an abortion clinic.
	It's now been awarded 13,000 pounds.
	I'm guessing $15,000, $16,000 from the police that the police have to pay.
	But isn't it interesting what we see happening here with these globalist elites and their religion?
	Their religion of worshipping depravity and debauchery, LGBT. They want to murder babies.
	They want to mutilate minors.
	It's all about their religion.
	And they treat it like a religion.
	You are in our sacred space.
	We have a right of abortion.
	R-I-T-E. And you're there praying.
	Are they afraid of the prayers? I don't know.
	Prayers are effective, quite frankly.
	But perhaps they just see this as a way for them to exercise power.
	In the same way the Biden administration...
	It's arresting peaceful protesters and sending them to jail for lengthy terms.
	What amounts to a life sentence for some elderly and firm people who were there in wheelchairs.
	So, she was first arrested in November of 2022 for silently praying in a so-called buffer zone, the sacred space for child sacrifice and liberal rights, R-I-T-E-S. Her last name is Vaughn Spruce.
	She was supported by the Christian defense organization Alliance Defending Freedom UK. There's an Alliance Defending Freedom in the United States as well.
	She was acquitted of all charges in February 2023.
	She was arrested again weeks later for the same offense.
	Footage of the arrest went viral.
	I've played that in the past as the officers heard saying, you said that you're engaging in prayer.
	That's the offense. I'm not doing anything.
	Standing here silently. However, charges were dropped again following an intervention from the then Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, who wrote to the police force to say that silent prayer is, quote, not unlawful, unquote.
	Commenting on her 13,000 pound payout, she said, silent prayer is not a crime.
	Nobody should be arrested merely for the thoughts they have in their heads.
	Yet this is what happened to me twice at the hands of the West Midlands police, who explicitly told me that, quote, prayer is an offense, unquote.
	There is no place for Orwell's thought police in 21st century Britain, and thanks to legal support I receive from the ADF of UK, I'm delighted that the settlement I've received today acknowledges that.
	While the payout represents a victory for the cause of religious liberty and freedom of speech in Britain, it comes as the new left-wing Labor Party government is reportedly considering measures to formally criminalize silent prayer outside abortion clinics on a national level.
	That's exactly right.
	Again, well, it's not a crime to silently pray.
	Well, their response, the new labor government's response is, well, let's make it a crime to pray silently.
	The MPs voted for legislation last year that would ban silent prayer within buffer zones of 150 meters around the location of a clinic or hospital providing abortion services.
	That's pretty amazing to think about.
	That's one and a half football fields.
	A radius of one and a half football fields.
	You can't pray or say anything about abortion.
	Can't even do it silently, right?
	This is about arbitrary government power.
	So, they said, when pushing back against it, the guidance from Parliament had said, quote, silent prayer, being the engagement of the mind and thought and prayer toward God is protected as an absolute right under the Human Rights Act of 1998 and should not on its own be considered to be an offense under any circumstances.
	You see how the UK left themselves open for attack.
	Because, you see, if you say that your rights come from something, some document somewhere, like the Human Rights Act of 1998, if that's what gives you your rights, then the government can take it away.
	They're not rights, then.
	They are government-granted privileges, of course.
	And so the American position, as defined in the Declaration of Independence, And whether or not it is defined in the Declaration of Independence, the truth is, and the American perspective is, and what the hill for us to die on is to say that our rights come from God.
	We are endowed by our Creator with inalienable rights, and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
	That's not the extended, that's not the complete list, but it certainly does include the right to life.
	And that comes from government.
	It does not come... It comes from God.
	It does not come from government.
	And the minute that we say that we get our rights from the Bill of Rights or from some Human Rights Act of 1998, we've lost.
	Home office is considering banning silent prayer outside abortion clinics.
	Free speech is under threat in Labor Britain.
	And so, too, it seems, is free non-speech.
	Why do you think that they included...
	Political and religious freedoms in the First Amendment together because they always go together.
	You can't have one without the other.
	We specifically voted against proposals to allow silent prayer and consensual communication safe access zones, said the new policing minister.
	I noticed that the Home Office has produced guidance which includes those measures being allowed.
	I just wondered why you would do that when Parliament has been very clear.
	That that was not the will of Parliament.
	In other words, we've already spoken clearly on this, that we don't want this punished.
	And yet you ignore that.
	And you're going to do it anyway.
	Well, that's where we are, isn't it?
	Nobody is paying any attention, even pretending to pay any attention to the superior laws, just as Biden and Trump didn't care to pay any attention to the Constitution.
	We haven't had anybody in office for the longest time that's in Congress or the presidency, anybody in the federal government.
	None of them care about it.
	Why? Because the federal government is a foreign-occupied government.
	It embraces all of the globalist agenda.
	Because the globalist agenda comes from them.
	They're the ones who are formulating this stuff.
	We're the major...
	We're the major influence in terms of funding and everything else for the UN and for NATO and for all of these organizations.
	So as I said earlier, the Church of England is going to drop the word church from the names of its congregations.
	As this article in the center says, they're coming clean finally.
	So what are they going to call it?
	We're of England. Of England.
	Is it going to be the club?
	Is it going to be the community? What is it going to be?
	We don't know. It hasn't been a church for a long, long time, if ever.
	Church of England established by Henry VIII's ego-driven break from Rome so that he could divorce his wife.
	This institution has now traded the gospel for the latest social fad.
	And it's like, I love the way the center put this, it's like an aging actor who is desperately chasing after the next big role, oblivious to how ridiculous they've become.
	They've dropped the word church from their new congregations because apparently even acknowledging their identity is too much of a burden.
	It's like a chef refusing to call their restaurant a restaurant in hopes that people will finally appreciate their microwaved meals.
	I guess that's the way you're going to get fed at the C of E.
	The church, quote unquote, in its pursuit of relevance has become irrelevant.
	Just another hollow institution echoing the world's empty slogans.
	The Church of England is not evolving, it's dissolving.
	Ah, that's it right there.
	It's not evolving, it's dissolving.
	Apparently, even using the word church is too burdensome for an organization that has eagerly embraced every passing cultural fad like a chameleon changing colors to blend in with its surroundings.
	And of course, they are so focused on On being relevant to the culture.
	Matching the culture and everything.
	Do you even know what the word church came from?
	Ekklesia means the called out.
	You're called out of that stuff.
	You're not to be trying to join with that.
	We see that in the big mega churches here that are setting up movie themes in their lobbies and everything.
	It's like a party stuff.
	Church of England increasingly avoiding the word church In favor of more, quote, relevant and modern-sounding, unquote, descriptors.
	That's the way they refer to it.
	Things like community. When they name new worship groups.
	A worship group? I guess the question I have is, what are they worshiping?
	Are they worshiping Hollywood?
	Are they worshiping LGBT? Are they worshiping themselves?
	Who are they worshiping, right?
	Who needs Jesus when you've got social justice, homosexuality, abortion rights to preach?
	This guy says, so kudos to the Church of England for finally admitting what we have all known for years.
	No longer a church in any meaningful way.
	No longer called out.
	We'll have to call them out about that, I guess.
	And, of course, America is becoming less religious, but no one more so than this group.
	And what group is that?
	As I said at the top of the program, it's women.
	And this...
	Mainstream media article from AOL starts out, As a Nicaraguan-born girl growing up in Miami, Prisca Dorcas Majoyca Rodriguez remembers going to church five times a week.
	Her father was a pastor. Their fundamentalist evangelical faith taught that a woman's role was to serve her husband.
	Well, she didn't like that.
	Ultimately dismayed by the subservient role of women and the church's harsh restrictions on girls, she would leave her faith and her husband in her late 20s after she got a master's degree in divinity.
	In divinity. Here.
	You are now a god.
	That's what she thinks, I guess, with her divinity degree.
	It's like... The Wizard of Oz.
	Women are less inclined to be involved with churches that don't want us speaking up.
	We're like the mules of church.
	That's what it feels like.
	That's what I said at the beginning of the program when I was talking about Ayn Rand.
	This whole idea that I'm not going to serve other people.
	I'm not going to get involved in altruism.
	Who is going to be the greater one of us?
	So the apostles to Christ, and he says, well, you will serve, the greatest of you will serve the lesser.
	That's the model. That's the kicking back against these fundamental attitudes that Christ has given us.
	The way that we are to regard each other, the way we are to regard our spouse, our family, society, the other members of the church, they've pushed back against all of these things.
	I will be Lord.
	Right? The pride of Satan.
	And so, you know, when we look at this, yeah, she said, you know, this is a curse.
	It feels like a curse. It feels like a curse because it is a curse.
	We're all subordinate in one way or the other, aren't we?
	I mean, you know, when you look at, again, do you believe the Bible?
	If you don't believe the Bible, why are you bothering to go to church?
	Where did you get these ideas from?
	Why do you take some of it, you pick and choose, and you edit it out?
	People criticize Thomas Jefferson, and rightfully so, for cutting out the things that he didn't like out of the Bible.
	These people do it, they just don't do it literally.
	Well, you know, as part of the fall, the man was cursed.
	There's no intermediate area.
	God is either blessing us, or He's cursing us.
	And so, if your work feels like drudgery, If it feels like futility and frustration, yeah, join the club.
	That's part of the curse.
	That's the curse, the curse of that.
	And then, of course, the woman who was first to rebel against God in cosmic rebellion got a double curse.
	Subordination was part of it, but then also health issues and things like that.
	And everybody's cursed with death, right?
	So all those things are there.
	The question is, how do we get God's blessing?
	But nobody really wants that.
	They want to do it on their own, right?
	They want to do whatever serves them, whatever serves their life.
	That's why I said, you know, Ayn Rand should be proud.
	Her philosophy has been completely enacted along with a sexual debauchery to make the worship of self Even stronger.
	63% of Americans are Christian, according to the Pew Research Center.
	That's down from 90% in the early 90s.
	So in 30 years, it's dropped 30 points.
	It's in free fall.
	And you know what else is in free fall?
	Morals, free speech, everything in our society is in free fall.
	You're either blessed or you're cursed.
	There's no intermediate stage there.
	Young women are moving further left politically.
	Yeah, so we notice.
	Interesting to me that talking about how clueless Trump is.
	Somebody did an AI thing of a bunch of young women Swifties with, you know, Swifties for Trump shirt.
	It was an AI thing. And Trump fell for it.
	He thought it was real. He reposted that.
	Now he's really got them motivated.
	They're really angry at him. But we've got even GOP congressmen from New York has cut a 30-second ad to say that he supports abortion up to birth.
	Mark Molinaro for Congress, a Republican, a New York Republican congressman, trying to run for re-election.
	And so he has to bow the knee to the new religion.
	Most of the Republicans are just trying to ignore it and hope that it goes away.
	But they won't fight for babies.
	They won't even kiss babies anymore.
	I believe health decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor, not Washington.
	I was the first Republican to back federal protection for IVF and to support federal access to birth control, he said.
	Okay, were you there?
	When health decisions, people want to make their health decisions in 2020 about vaccines and about masks and about social distancing and about whether or not they live their life.
	Oh, that's right. You weren't. So shut up.
	You're not about freedom.
	You're not about health freedom, about any of that stuff.
	You just want to kill babies.
	Be honest about it.
	You and the rest of these Republicans, at least this guy comes out and says, yeah, I want to kill babies.
	The rest of them are just silent.
	They're silent and When it was done to us in 2020.
	They're silent when it's done to babies.
	All the time. Silence.
	Well, they're not going to be the silent majority for long, are they?
	30-second spot is no frills, said Politico.
	Said it features a GOP first-term lawmaker looking into the camera to voice what he has witnessed, expressed rather, in written response to the Democrats' recent attacks on him as anti-abortion.
	So that's one way to handle it.
	Instead of just running away.
	And when you look at Austin. Austin, Texas.
	I'm so glad I don't live there anymore.
	Never liked it. And we didn't live in Austin.
	Had to go in every day.
	Austin is going to take a half a million dollars in taxpayer money to pay for abortion travel.
	$500,000 for, quote, reproductive health logistical support.
	In other words, abortion travel expenses.
	The fund will not only help women travel, but also pay for a companion to accompany them.
	As Texas Right for Life reports, it is unclear exactly how the city plans to allocate the funds as, quote, it is a crime in Texas to donate money to organizations that procure out-of-state abortions.
	Any individual or government entity that gives to these groups becomes complicit in their criminal acts, unquote.
	Well, this is Marxist Austin, and they are begging the Republicans to do something about it.
	Will they? See, if they go in and they do criminal prosecution, they're hoping that they can become martyrs.
	That's a very powerful thing, to become martyrs for that.
	And they will look like, they can make themselves look like martyrs, because the Republicans refuse to show what an abortion is.
	They refuse to show what life is.
	They refuse to value life, to value family.
	I just showed yesterday a clip of a father in Brazil at 32 weeks of age, ultrasound, a 4D ultrasound, or you can see movement of the baby.
	And the baby recognized his voice already.
	And he starts talking baby talk to the baby as they're doing the ultrasound.
	The baby starts smiling. Just show that kind of stuff.
	If you don't have the stomach to show the reality of abortion.
	At least show the reality of life.
	And elevate that.
	But they won't do that.
	Austin is also, Marxist Austin is also a sanctuary city for child mutilation.
	And then finally this.
	Computer tablet use is linked to angry outbursts amongst toddlers.
	Now they don't say it in this article here.
	This is from CBS News.
	But Steve Jobs did not allow his kids to get on computers until they were in their teens.
	Or later, I think.
	Late teens, I think it was.
	I forget the exact age.
	But the guy who created the iPhone, the guy who created the iPad and all the rest of the stuff, he...
	No, I'm not going to let my kids on that.
	He knows. He knows.
	While allowing little kids to stare at a computer screen often gives parents a much-needed respite, new research suggests cutting back on the practice with early tablet use linked to increased outbursts later on.
	It's not good for the kids when that becomes their main...
	Instruction device at school either.
	You know, this drill and practice stuff.
	That's not a positive influence for them.
	Children who log 75 minutes or more a day screen time at three and a half years old were more apt to outbursts of anger and frustration a year later.
	Further, the findings suggest a vicious cycle at play.
	With little kids who were more apt toward expressions of anger and frustration at four and a half years old, likely to spend even more time on an iPad a year later.
	So they said, repeated use, you can use it to pacify them if they throw a temper tantrum.
	But repeated use of this kind of strategy does not allow children to develop strong internal emotional regulation skills, they said.
	Duh. Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
	I've told this story before.
	Travis is doing the board here.
	When he was very young, he's younger than three and a half, and we were eating at a restaurant, and he started throwing a temper tantrum, and I could not discipline him in the restaurant, probably get CPS on me, so I just picked him up and took him out to the car and put him in the car seat and strapped him in and let him just flail away.
	I shut the door, and I stepped back so he couldn't see me.
	He thought he was stuck in the car until he was all cried out.
	I just sat there watching him.
	He couldn't see me. And then I took him out.
	I said, you're going to be good now?
	We never had that problem again.
	I didn't give him a computer tablet.
	I wouldn't have done that, even if we had had one.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you Well, we've all seen the pictures of Cuban cars.
	As a matter of fact, Travis, pull this up.
	This is under tech.
	We've all seen the pictures of the Cuban cars.
	You know, it's kind of frozen in time in the 1950s when the communists took over.
	No new cars coming in.
	There's a picture of them. All these old cars in the 1950s.
	And now what is happening is they're making it impossible for them to drive these cars.
	Think about that. These are cars that they have been able to keep running for 60 years.
	They treat them with great care.
	They keep fixing them and so forth.
	But how are they stopping it?
	And how are they getting them to move away from these classic cars?
	We should let Eric Peters know about this.
	Maybe... We could arrange some deals with them to get some of these things.
	We could make a lot of money in the United States, especially around this area.
	People love classic cars.
	And they've been really well maintained.
	The problem is they're just starving them for fuel.
	They said that the Communist Party there is keeping gasoline and diesel fuel very difficult to obtain.
	And that's the same approach that is being run by our communists here in America as well.
	And so what they're trying to do is move them away from these cars, the same cars that they've been able to maintain for 60 years, and move them away from that to electric scooters.
	And China has a hand in this because, again, all manufacturing is going to be coming from China because we are giving them the advantage of In terms of cheap energy.
	After 65 years of communist rule, repressing natural economic activity, blocking access to the U.S. market, replacing the nation's educated class of poorly prepared regime elites, Cuba's power grid is potentially more unreliable than its old cars.
	That's right. They're deliberately destroying it.
	The communists in Cuba are destroying their power grid just like the communists in America.
	And that makes even the electric scooters a gamble.
	Just like it makes it a gamble for you to spend the extra money to get an electric car.
	Are you going to be able to charge it? No.
	California has already restricted that type of thing.
	And you're going to wind up paying a lot of money for a battery electric vehicle that they will demand you use to back up their grid.
	Oh yeah, let's put the juice in and then we'll suck it back out.
	But you can't drive it. And of course, every time you cycle the charges, they've only got a certain number of cycles that they're good for.
	It destroys the life of the battery to some degree.
	So the Chinese press has depicted the rise of electric vehicles as a viable solution to the fuel shortages and the communist economic crises that the Cubans are experiencing.
	Tens of thousands of EVs, though, relying on the power grid to function, We'll likely impose significant strain on their already fragile power grid.
	And it's convenient that the electric motorbike factory that is there in Cuba is owned by a Chinese company.
	Now, what have they done to make it impossible to use these cars that they've been using for 60 years, even under previous communism?
	Now, you've got communism...
	Mixed with the global green agenda, and that's proven fatal.
	Even worse than 60 years of communism is the kind of green agenda that is being imposed upon all of us, communists or not.
	As of July, Reuters reported that refueling a car in Cuba could take hours or days on some occasions.
	So they've made fueling a car, which should only take a minute at the most, right?
	They're talking about 10 gallons.
	I've timed it. How long does it take me to pump 10 gallons into my car?
	It takes me about 45 seconds on most pumps.
	The rest of the stuff, in terms of the financial transaction and opening up your...
	You know, your gas cap and all the rest of the stuff.
	That's the kind of thing you'd have to do with an electric vehicle as well.
	You've still got to go through the transaction stuff.
	You've still got to open up the port and get the thing and plug it in.
	But the actual transference of energy, if you will, if you're using fuel for a 10-gallon tank, should take you about 40 to 45 seconds.
	But it takes hours or days now in Cuba.
	And there was a five-fold price hike earlier this year.
	This is what they're going to do.
	What they're doing in Cuba is what the communists and the greens, again, the whole green agenda, they're watermelon Marxist.
	Thin veneer green, all communism.
	But this is what they're going to do worldwide.
	So they're going to jack up the price of fuel.
	And make it unavailable.
	A five-fold price increase earlier this year.
	So a 10-gallon tank of gas costs more than the average state worker's monthly wage.
	Think about that.
	Just one tank of gas, 10 gallons, is going to cost more than the average state worker's wage.
	This has led to the adoption of EVs.
	They're forcing them into this.
	With no apparent plan for dramatically expanding the electricity supply either, because they don't want you moving.
	And this is where we're getting this everywhere.
	I mean, this is Cuba, but this is happening everywhere.
	Here's Cuba. They're good buddies with Venezuela.
	Venezuela's got more oil than Saudi Arabia, but guess what?
	The Venezuelans are communists, and they can't figure out how to do anything.
	They can't get the oil out.
	They can't refine it. So, you know, nothing there for Cuba.
	But they don't want anybody moving.
	That's the whole point of what's happening now.
	And you think that Trump is going to help with this stuff?
	Trump is a thousand percent clueless about it.
	Just the comment that he made about artificial intelligence.
	He knows that he's been told that he's got to suck up the AI and the companies that are pushing this stuff out there.
	He's got to suck up to big tech.
	He's got to suck up to the AI. Technocratic overlords.
	So he's got to suck up to the people who are doing AI. He's got to suck up to the cyber currencies and stuff, right?
	Cryptocurrency. So, yeah, I'm all for that stuff.
	I love it. And yet, he made the comment, he says, well, yeah, we need to have more workers from abroad.
	We need to open up for more immigration because AI is going to need workers.
	He's looking at this, and he, okay, so artificial intelligence, that's the up-and-coming thing, and it's really exploding in growth.
	We're going to need more workers. He doesn't have a clue what AI is about.
	How is he going to defend against what the globalists are doing, even if he were in, even if he wanted to?
	He's absolutely clueless.
	He doesn't know anything about 2030.
	He doesn't know about the fourth turning.
	He doesn't know about the entire AI agenda, which is to take your jobs.
	And then to pacify you by giving you universal basic income.
	He doesn't know anything about that.
	He just sees, oh, well, everybody's talking about this new thing called AI. Well, the companies that are making the AI are going to need more workers to make the AI. No, they're not.
	You have Cisco posted $10.3 billion in profits last year.
	That's in profits, not sales.
	Profits. But they're still laying off 5,500 workers.
	Why? Because they want to invest more in AI. And because AI is not about hiring people.
	It's not about workers at all.
	Is Trump the last person on earth to not figure this out?
	And so when you look at Google, or as I should say, Giggle, the search engine that is a joke, the former CEO, Eric Schmidt, did a conference And he had a couple of things that he had to say that really have created a buzz.
	He blamed working from home for the problems that Giggle is having with AI, being behind their competitors.
	Ex-Giggle CEO... Eric Schmidt is walking back his questionable claims that remote work is to blame for giggles slipping behind open AI. And, of course, what is working from home really doing?
	Gerald Salenti has talked about this for the longest time.
	The commercial real estate bust.
	Productivity bust.
	It's going to bring down the banks and all the rest of this stuff.
	Gerald got it right, but Eric Schmidt...
	Looking at this and thinking that it's to blame for their lack of productivity.
	Look, if you look at the way that Giggle treats their workers, I've got to say that working in that environment is probably a lot more distracting than working from home.
	The way they pamper them and the things that they do.
	But he was giving a speech at Stanford University, and the speech got put on YouTube.
	And during the talk, asked why Giggle was falling behind other AI firms.
	He said, it's because we decided to let our staffers enjoy remote work, and with it, a bit of work-life balance.
	Giggle decided that work-life balance is going home early and working from home, and that was more important than winning, he said.
	And the reason that startups work is because people work like hell, he said.
	Again, that's not been what Giggle was about for the longest time.
	They've been about pampering everybody.
	But he had something else to say in the Stanford speech that got people also upset.
	As part of this, he said, well, it's fine if AI companies steal all the content.
	He says, if it takes off, then you just hire a bunch of lawyers to go clean up the mess, right?
	This is the ethics, quote-unquote, ethics, right?
	Of Silicon Valley.
	Sure, steal all the stuff.
	You know, it used to be that their motto was move fast and break things.
	Now I guess with AI it's move fast and steal things.
	And when we make a lot of money, we'll hire a bunch of lawyers and they'll get us off the hook.
	They'll make it all right.
	Are you worried that your AI startup might be illegally swallowing up boatloads of copyright protected content?
	Well, according to the former Giggle CEO, Eric Schmidt, you can worry about that later.
	Once you have oodles of cash and a platoon of lawyers.
	So, The Verge reported that during a recent talk at Stanford's School of Engineering, Schmidt displayed what can only be described as the Silicon Valley CEO's final boss energy, as he laid out a theoretical scenario in which the students in the room might use a large language model to build a TikTok competitor in the case that the platform was to be banned.
	He says, here's what I propose each and every one of you do.
	Say to your large language model the following.
	Make me a copy of TikTok.
	Steal all the users.
	Steal all the music.
	Put my preferences in it.
	Produce this program in the next 30 seconds.
	Release it, and in one hour, if it's not viral, do something different along the same lines, he told everybody.
	He said, that's the command that I would give.
	And he says what you would do if you're a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, he said, is if it took off, then you'd hire a whole bunch of lawyers to go clean up the mess, right?
	And then he added that if nobody uses your product, it doesn't matter that you stole all the content anyway.
	And he says, don't quote me.
	Except they did quote him.
	This is the ethics of Silicon Valley.
	And... Do we have Dr.
	Shiva? What's that?
	Almost. Okay.
	We're still trying to make a connection.
	He did at one point try to point out that he was not arguing that you should illegally steal everybody's music.
	But he had just told everybody to do that.
	He kind of had this, as they say, was his final boss moment, right?
	Now, I think what happened was he just started speaking candidly.
	And I think we got a glimpse.
	Out of the heart, out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks.
	And out of the abundance of the heart of this guy, who, by the way, he may be the former CEO of Giggle, but he is currently kind of the CEO of the military-industrial complex.
	He had a tremendous amount of influence and impact in the Obama administration, and that has only grown...
	With artificial intelligence that he's bringing in to the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex.
	He is one of the chief people that this kind of person, this kind of ethics, this is the kind of person that is creating autonomous killer robots.
	You see, we talk about ethics because it really matters.
	It really matters.
	And what you believe in your heart is going to affect your life and the life of other people.
	And this is why we have a society that is the way that it is.
	We are reaping what we have sown.
	And in addition to that, I think God is directly cursing us with people like Eric Schmidt and Trump and Lala and Biden.
	He apparently sees the alleged intellectual property theft as just a mess for lawyers to clean up later.
	Schmidt told the Stanford students, he said, Silicon Valley will run these tests, and then they will clean up the mess.
	He said, typically, that's the way things are done.
	Yeah, you move fast and you steal things.
	That really describes it better than moving fast and breaking things.
	And so... That's one of the guys behind the big AI revolution.
	But then, of course, the one who has been up front has been Sam Altman and his OpenAI.
	And he is also running the WorldCoin scam.
	He not only wants to run artificial intelligence, and he's given multiple presentations to Congress talking about how only people like him And, you know, presumably whoever's running Giggle, just like somebody, just like Eric Schmidt, only people who are like those guys should be entrusted with AI. The government should step in and stop other people from competing with them.
	That's why I say, you know, I don't think anything is going to happen with this anti-trust stuff against Giggle.
	Because these people are too firmly entrenched.
	And as he was saying this and scaring everybody about how AI could be weaponized, they were all saying, oh yeah, yeah, we need to let responsible people like Sam Altman, somebody who is going around the world and scanning people's eyes to create a global biometric database, and then giving them a little bit of cryptocurrency for their trouble.
	And a worthless cryptocurrency that he has created.
	And so now, the Wall Street Journal reports jurisdictions around the world are starting to look with a critical eye at his eye scan.
	They said, the nominally altruistic project.
	There's nothing altruistic about this at all.
	He's got designs of things that he wants to do.
	Iron Man would be proud of him.
	He's going to control everybody.
	And so multiple countries are pushing back against this.
	You get 25 of his cryptocurrency coins in exchange.
	Oh, great.
	Great. And so there's a lot of companies, but the countries that are talking about stopping this thus far, only Kenya...
	Which is one of the first countries where the project was piloted.
	Only Kenya has closed its probe after a year-long suspension.
	But several others are talking about hopefully they will stop it.
	But these are the people who seek to run the world.
	And so we're going to take a quick break.
	We now have Dr. Shiva on, and we're going to catch up with him and find out what is on his radar and how the campaign is going.
	We'll be right back with Dr.
	Shiva, who is running a grassroots campaign for president.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	♪♪♪
	the
	defending the American dream You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alright, welcome back, and joining us now is Dr.
	Shiva Ayyadurai, who has run for, I think it was Senate in Massachusetts.
	He's been very politically active, but he's also trying to help people to get control of their lives.
	You can find, he's got several different websites, shiva4president.com, shiva4president.com is one place where you can find him.
	So joining us now is Dr.
	Shiva. I wanted to get him on to have some counter-programming to the We're good to go.
	Pre-eminently, what we are leading with is people need to learn how to save themselves.
	Save yourself. There's no one coming to save us.
	And I don't mean that against any religious or spiritual modes, but I mean that in a very, very...
	Well, you know, we just had Joe Rogan and was it Dennis Quaid or Randy Quaid?
	I can't remember. I get them mixed up.
	Who had just got a movie about Reagan and they were saying, so who's running the country?
	And it's like, why do you want anybody to run the country in the first place?
	Exactly. Secondly, we can see that nobody visible is running the country.
	The people who are running the country are not the people that you're voting for.
	So what can we do to make our lives better?
	Yeah, the swarm is running the country.
	It's a decentralized group of people who have built a maximized power, profit, and control.
	But what I wanted to share with you, David, is that we have a massive movement, a global movement, Truth, Freedom, and Health.
	In the United States, that movement is manifesting itself to, again, mobilize people bottoms up, to build a serious movement that educates people that it is only us, we the people, that can have ever changed anything significantly.
	It never has come from top down.
	If anything has come from top down, it's hijacking of bottoms up movements to divert them.
	That's right.
	But one of the important things is that in the United States, when you run for election, particularly in the general election on November 5, which is coming up 2024, people forget that we're a republic.
	We have states, and the states elect their representatives to this organization called the United States government.
	They elect House of Representatives, they elect senators, but they also elect electors.
	This is very hard for people to understand the 12th Amendment.
	They do not elect me for president.
	They do not elect Trump.
	They do not elect Kamala Harris on November 5th.
	And the way this has manifested itself in a very real way, and I would probably say only about 100 people really understand this from a legal and even judges.
	And let me explain what I'm talking about.
	So we have been getting on the ballots in many states, close to 15 states, and other states will be...
	We still are getting on the ballot as a write-in.
	You have to still... So when you get on the ballot...
	In a state, everyone should listen to this carefully, it's not I am getting on the ballot for November 5th.
	It is a set of electors.
	So, for example, in the state of New Jersey, people come together and some people say, oh, we like this guy Trump.
	Other people say, we like this woman Kamala.
	Other people say, we like Dr.
	Shiva. Those people can be electors of me.
	And And so, in New Jersey, you need 14 electors.
	And the 14 electors, that number reflects the number of House of Representatives plus two senators, typically.
	Okay? So those electors, those slate of electors, the slate of electors for Trump, the slate of electors for Kamala Harris, the slate of electors for Dr.
	Sheba, are the ones who are running for office on November 5th.
	I'm not the one who's running.
	Why? Because we're a Republican.
	I'm a resident of Massachusetts.
	I can't run for office...
	Of electors, which is the Office of Electors in New Jersey.
	I would say most people don't even know this, David.
	I'd say 99.9% of people.
	So, in New Jersey, we have thousands of volunteers.
	Out of them arose 14 electors.
	Those electors then have to go get papers from the Secretary of State to nominate...
	So people are nominating them, those slates.
	Okay? So our slate of electors who...
	People want me, who say that if they are elected electors on December 17th, which is the first Monday after the second Wednesday, that's when those electors, if they win, will vote for me.
	It's a little bit complicated, but this is how the actual general election works in a presidential election.
	So New Jersey, our slate of electors...
	Fulfilled all their rules to get themselves on the ballot, which means they got the signatures, they got thousands of signatures, everything.
	So we get on the ballot.
	Then we get a challenge, a lawsuit by Kamala Harris against me running for office.
	Not me, but to be specific, the electors that want me to be president.
	Okay? Okay.
	And the challenge was not directed to me.
	I am not the party.
	I mean, it was directed to me.
	It wasn't directed to our electors.
	And the challenge said, oh, Dr.
	Shiva writing a letter to me, a lawsuit against me, saying you can't be president because you're not natural born.
	Okay? So let's unpack that.
	A, they have no jurisdiction over me.
	B, the qualifications for president are not decided until December 17th and thereafter by Congress.
	Only Congress can decide.
	C, a slate of electors can pledge their votes to anyone.
	Mickey Mouse, Fidel Castro, someone who's 10 years old, someone who's 100 years old.
	They can pledge their vote to anyone.
	So again, everyone needs to understand this very simple concept, but it's not because people don't teach history anymore.
	Those collective electors, when they put the name, when you go to vote, it says Dr.
	Shiva. That's a brand.
	That means they're saying we're under this brand called Dr.
	Schieber, Trump or Harris. Now, prior to the 1900s, when you went to vote, let's say there's three people running for office and there's 14 electors, you could have 42 names on a ballot.
	My math is right, 3 times 14.
	And it became onerous for the states to do this.
	So they said, oh, we're going to collapse these electors under a label, Trump.
	Kamala Harris, Dr.
	Sheba. Okay? So it's very important to understand people are not voting for me or Trump or Harris on November 5th.
	They're voting for the slate of electors.
	Since you're running as an independent, I've been involved in this in third-party politics with the Libertarian Party back in the late 80s and early 90s.
	And that, what we were doing was we were getting a party on the ballot and And they would have, as part of your petitions that you'd sign, you'd have to have the wording that we, the undersigned, want to form a political party.
	It's not just that I would like to see a choice on the ballot.
	No, you're forming a political party or whatever.
	And so what they would do is they would allocate to the parties who were free to choose their candidates any way they chose. They could have a state-financed primary, or they could just meet in convention and choose their candidates. And then also in meeting in convention, they would choose their delegates. So that if that party, for president, they would have a nominee that they put there, that would be that whole slate of delegates whose names were submitted to the
	So with you, and is it just in New Jersey?
	Is it the wording there or is it something that.
	Everywhere.
	You're voting for the office of electors, every state.
	This is a 12th amendment, but you're not voting for the president.
	You're not voting for the name, Donald Trump.
	You're voting for that slate of electors.
	This is why they could swap out Biden for Harris, because those slate of electors were pledged to Biden, which is a name.
	It's a brand. And you can just flip it to Harris tomorrow.
	So in every state, you're not voting on November 5th for a president.
	You're voting for a slate of electors.
	In fact, if you read every state election code, it says in there, please be mindful, even though the name of your candidate is showing up there, you're not voting for them.
	You're voting for the electors. Anyway, so Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party sue me.
	Now, they have never sued anyone in New Jersey before.
	In 1972, Linda Jenis ran under the Socialist Workers' Party.
	Okay? Meaning she didn't run her slate of electors ran.
	She was only 31 years old.
	Roger Calero ran in 2004 and 2008.
	He was not a naturalized citizen.
	He wasn't natural born.
	He was a Nicaraguan citizen.
	But he was...
	a different party's candidate, okay?
	Those set of electors.
	No one challenged him.
	In fact, he got on the ballot and got about a couple hundred votes.
	But that's the way it runs.
	This is why in Colorado, when Colorado tried to take Trump off the ballot, the Supreme Court swooped in and said, no, you don't have any right to qualify, because they said he's unqualified to run for president because he committed insurrection.
	Committing insurrection is one of the qualifications, or not committing insurrection.
	Everyone needs to understand that the qualifications for becoming president are decided by David, can you take one second?
	Sure, sure. Yeah, it's very interesting because this is the party that is always talking about it.
	It's the end of democracy!
	This is the party that has shut down all of the primaries.
	This is the party, by the way, that wanted to shut down the primaries in Florida.
	The DNC shut it down.
	They had, at the time, I don't know if Cornel West was still there, but You know, Cornel West was running essentially as a Democrat, RFK Jr.
	running as a Democrat. You had this other guy, what was his name, Philip Dean or something.
	But, you know, they had three or four people who wanted to run against Biden, and they said, no, we're just going to shut down the primary.
	Sorry about that, David. Sure, no problem.
	So anyway, the key thing I want to let everyone know is, and by the way, most lawyers don't know this.
	Most judges don't know this.
	Yeah. They don't. Well, there's a height of, I was just telling the audience where you were going, I said, it's the height of hypocrisy.
	These people were saying, well, it's going to be the end of democracy.
	You know, you've got to vote for the Democrats because we're all about democracy.
	You know, you can vote. Yeah.
	You're voting for a slate of electors.
	Right, right. The reality is anyone can run for office.
	A five-year-old can run.
	Fidel Castro, Vladimir Putin can run for office in the United States if he gets a bunch of electors saying they're going to pledge.
	What will happen is, let's say that happens.
	Let's say a bunch of electors get together in New Jersey and they say, we want...
	By the way, any state. Our pledge candidate is Putin.
	Let's say he gets all the electoral votes on December 17th.
	What would then happen, David, is we'd go to Congress.
	Congress would then say, no, no, no, he can't be on, he can't be our president because he's not born here, he wants to overthrow the United States, etc.
	The point is, many people, anyone can run for office.
	So why is Kamala Harris' campaign, they came after me, it went to one of the lower courts by an administrative judge.
	The guy didn't even...
	Listen to any of the arguments.
	Then I had to appeal it to the appellate court.
	They didn't want to hear it. And now it got appealed to the New York Supreme Court.
	New Jersey Supreme Court.
	And they didn't want to hear it.
	Really? What's interesting is the main newspaper in New Jersey said, oh, they didn't want to hear it, dot, dot, dot, because he's anti-Israel and he's anti-vaccine mandates.
	Okay? He justified it.
	The bottom line is the following.
	They sued the wrong person because the electors are the ones they should have gone after.
	My electors. Bottom line is they did everything perfectly.
	So we have a major lawsuit that's brewing right now.
	Number one, natural born equals naturalized citizen.
	That's the 14th Amendment, which has been adjudicated with Schneider versus Rusk and Bowling versus Sharp.
	So I told everyone when we ran, this would come up.
	But the bottom line is, we are a republic.
	Every state elects its electors.
	Those electors can pledge their vote to anyone.
	It is Congress who decides who's qualified or not.
	So if I were to get elected, Or all the electors, to be specific, get elected who pledged their vote to me.
	On December 17th thereafter, Congress would have to have a meeting.
	Wait a minute. He's a naturalized citizen.
	Is that qualified or not?
	That would go into a massive debate.
	Yeah. That's when qualification occurs.
	So they are conflating, running for president with becoming president.
	Yes. Running for president is different than becoming president.
	Anyone can run for president.
	Everyone should repeat that a hundred times.
	Anyone can run for president.
	And when you run for president on election day, you are not voting for the president of the United States.
	When it comes to the presidential election, you're voting for the office of electors.
	Right. And if those, based on those slates of office of electors getting selected...
	Then, that candidate, then they pledge that candidate.
	This is really like prior restraint.
	That's right. And so, you know, when you look at this, what does it tell us?
	It tells us, A, the Democrats are hypocrites.
	B, they don't want to have elections.
	They're scared to death of people having a choice.
	And, of course, they're also afraid of you because they didn't do this with other candidates.
	Exactly, because I will probably take half a million votes or something, or a couple hundred thousand votes in New Jersey.
	I'm very well known. That's where email was created.
	I'm well known all over New Jersey.
	Yeah. So Kamala Harris is afraid that I will disturb that.
	They didn't do this to Roger Calero, who ran for president.
	Nicaraguan citizen. So this is the big news.
	And Wisconsin is doing the same thing.
	Because they know, I'm the candidate, David, that they must make invisible.
	It's only a few guys like you who walk the walk.
	All these other influencers and podcasters who talk about against Zionism, who talk about anti-establishment, they're scared...
	You can fill in the blanks to put me on their shows.
	Right. That's right.
	That's what's really going on.
	I'm the big elephant in the room people want to make invisible.
	But the fact that Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party...
	And by the way, it's interesting. Kamala Harris is supposedly Indian, whatever she is.
	The lawyer that they elected is an Indian guy.
	And the Secretary of State is a black woman.
	These people are violating the 14th Amendment.
	Separate of that. The 14th Amendment is what let Kamala Harris run, Obama run...
	And it allows me to run.
	So they always get, you know, color on color crime.
	This is what the elites did all over, British did all over Africa, right?
	You get the black people to oppress black people.
	The British did this in India.
	You get Gandhi to screw over the brown people.
	So this is quite fascinating to watch in Jersey, which is one of the highest populations of immigrants, legal immigrants, highest population of naturalized citizens, That Kamala, who, by the way, is a Tamil Brahmin, is going after a non-Brahmin.
	It's so wild.
	So where is it now? You said that you appealed...
	So now I can appeal it all the way to the Supreme Court, so that's what we're strategizing.
	This is going to be in days.
	This is hot news that everyone should be covering.
	The New Jersey Globe was forced to cover it.
	But they rationalized it saying, oh yeah, they don't need to hear his case.
	By the way, he's anti-vaccine mandates.
	He's against Israel.
	And as you know...
	That justifies it. That justifies keeping you out of politics.
	That's amazing. That is breaking news and that's very important.
	So I was not aware of that.
	It's very important. David, I have a slight thing.
	I can come back if you want a couple minutes, or we can do a follow-up, but I just have something that just popped up, because we have to submit a couple papers in both states.
	Sure, I understand. Yeah, you're on a deadline here.
	So, yeah, if you want to come back, you can do that, and we'll keep it open for you to do that if you want to get back on, Travis.
	What's that? I'll be right back, Trey.
	Keep it going. It is the hypocrisy, and I've got a comment here on Rumble, a question for Dr.
	Shiva about the Adelson's benefit and the money for Trump and things like that.
	I'm sure he's going to want to talk about that as well.
	But it is, you know, like I said, when everybody was arguing about the 2020 election, I said, the election corruption begins with ballot access.
	What do we see here? It begins with ballot access.
	If you can't even have a choice of who you want to vote for, if they shut people out of the debate, and that, of course, is what the newspaper is doing, justifying this.
	Well, you know, he's anti-vaccine, and he doesn't support Israel, so therefore he shouldn't be allowed on the ballot.
	Really? Again, this is not just prior restraint.
	But this is about weaponizing political positions against people.
	So that's really what we're looking at here with this.
	So he's going to be back with us in about five minutes.
	I'm going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Stay with us.
	This is a test.
	and
	you you Liberty. It's your move.
	And now, the David Knight Show.
	Well, while we're waiting for Dr. Shiva to come back, I thought it was interesting to see the reactions in the markets to LaLa's economic plan.
	Of course, the Washington Post dismissed it as a populist garbage and, you know, empty promises blaming corporations and others for profiteering off of the inflation that's been created by successive administrations.
	of course, and especially by the Biden administration.
	Gold soared to a record high as the dollar was dumped.
	When Kamala unveiled her, quote, populist, unquote, economic plan, Zero Hedge says, we're sure it's just a coincidence that the dollar plunged to five months lows on the day that she unveiled her plan.
	And we see gold going up and setting all new record highs, actually.
	Part of the response to all this, one analyst says, how crazy is $3,000 gold from here?
	Because it broke $2,500 for the first time earlier this week, and it is hanging above $2,500 for the last time I looked at it.
	It's going to, you know, nothing goes, as we always say, up and to the right always, but it is going to, I think, continue to trend higher.
	There will be fluctuations in it at all these different times, but again, it is the thing that everybody falls back on.
	When things look like they're going to go crazy, going to come apart, it is wealth insurance.
	And again, if you want to prepare for this type of stuff, especially for a Kamilala administration, if that is the case, or who knows what Trump will do.
	I mean, he's also talking about a lot of crazy nonsense as well.
	Whatever these two people are going to do this next four years Things are going to move very quickly and very strangely and very seriously because we're at the tail end of this fourth turning So if you want to keep your wealth protected and have Some leg outside of this system where they're going to try to control everything if you want to go to Tony Arteran wisewolf gold He's set up davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony's website.
	You can buy gold and silver, small or large transactions.
	Tony will work with you.
	And he'll even help you to gradually accumulate at whatever level you're comfortable with.
	He's got a lot of different tiers that you can make a monthly purchase of gold and silver Calls it wise wolf and you can get the group buying discounts as part of wise wolf every month You can set aside a little bit of money. It's a great savings program because It's really about saving your wealth. It's not just about saving some money people don't typically save anymore But if we're gonna save don't save it into dollars save it into something that's going to retain its value And that's what you can do with wise wolf. So
	It's interesting that the Democrats as part of their official platform Have decided not to talk at all about Bitcoin or crypto They said a lot of stuff about Bitcoin and crypto as part of their official policy for the last four years.
	Dead set against it.
	And so this is a dividing line between the Republicans and Democrats.
	I don't really know how serious the Republicans are in terms of protecting against CBDC. And I know that they do want to focus on crypto donors.
	And Trump Jr.
	has said that he wants to start his own crypto as a check against the Federal Reserve.
	And I said, well, you know, there's a way that you could have done that.
	Dr. Shiva is back now.
	Okay, good. Alright, Dr.
	Shiva has come back. Welcome back.
	And again, we've got a question for you, Dr.
	Shiva. Can you ask Dr.
	Shiva about Trump taking money from the Adelsons to benefit another country?
	Yeah, I mean, the big thing with Trump, and this comes back to this, I think, general question, David, about loyalty to the United States.
	Yeah. And the whole, I think it's very related to what the founders, I think, were really looking for when they wanted loyalty to the Constitution.
	It's very deeply related, in my view, to Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.
	When we talk about natural-born citizens, Yeah, absolutely.
	And this reality.
	That's about loyalty, as you said.
	It's about divided loyalty. Right.
	Who is more loyal, the person who takes $100 million from another country and says, I'm going to make sure you're going to own the presidency, and I'm going to make sure that you also own Congress again?
	I mean, who's got the loyalty there?
	Well, so if we go back...
	To the 1700s, Hamilton and Madison had many, many deep conversations about this, which John Yinger, a scholar at SUNY, has talked about.
	And he's documented. The bottom line is that when you really unravel all of this, and I don't have time to do a historic analysis here, but bottom line, the founders felt that That their theory was those people who were natural born just solely on the soil would be loyal.
	Those people who fought for this country, the Marquis de Lafayette, was made a natural born citizen, quote unquote natural born.
	It's never defined by the way.
	Quite interesting. He was born in France, but they made him a natural born citizen in all of his heirs.
	And then they carved out for naturalized citizens, about 10,000 or more of them, that they too could be president in 1787.
	Okay? There were seven signers of the Constitution, including William Patterson, who were born in England or other parts of They too could become president.
	So it's not like the founders had this very clear view, oh, anyone who was born outside of the United States is going to be disloyal.
	The general notion was that a naturalized citizen who became part of this country and natural born, and including someone like the Marquis de Lafayette, they gave him the nom de plume of natural born.
	Quite interesting. Now, you forward it to today to answer your question.
	We have 99.99% of people in Congress are natural-born citizens.
	Yet, they have to give their oath to AIPAC. Trump just got $100 million because he basically says, I mean, if you look at his speech he just gave that, you know, Israel should be expanded.
	He will do whatever it takes to support his, he'll put Israel first.
	And that's what's occurred in the United States.
	Now, you take someone like me, when I became a naturalized citizen, I had to give up my Indian citizenship.
	Which allowed me to be Prime Minister or President there.
	I had to take an oath of allegiance, which natural-born citizens do not need to take, saying that I will take arms up for the United States, that I will not follow any foreign powers, and I will not have dual citizenship.
	Okay? I had to do that as a naturalized citizen.
	Who the hell are these people who say that I cannot run for president?
	Yeah, let me ask you about that, because, you know, Trump endorsed Dr.
	Oz, who said, well, I'm not going to give up.
	He was in the Turkish army.
	Yeah, he was fought in the Turkish army and he said and I'm not gonna give up my Turkish citizenship Unless I'm elected and then that case I will give it up so that I can get in on the classified information Everything's like what you know, it's like where is this guy?
	But how how was he able to you said you had to give up your foreign citizenship and I think about my passport I think about my foreign citizenship and oath the leech. I mean if you look at the naturalized citizens oath of allegiance, yeah It's quite remarkable that everyone doesn't have to take that oath, David.
	I wonder, yeah, I wonder why Dr.
	Oz still had his citizenship in Turkey.
	And, you know, he still has it because he lost.
	But he was a guy that was endorsed by Trump.
	Exactly. So the reality is, we have to look at what these people say and what they do.
	Trump is a complete BS-er, okay?
	He says anything that needs to be said at the time to get whatever he wants, okay?
	Yep. And the oath of allegiance says, I hereby declare an oath, right, that I absolutely entirely renounce and adjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentiate state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have therefore been a subject or citizen, that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.
	I mean, there's other provisions here.
	But you're supposed to give a full oath to this country, right?
	Against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.
	That I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law.
	That I will perform non-combatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by law.
	That I will perform work of national importance under civil direction and required by the law.
	And that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion.
	So, natural born citizens do not have to take that oath.
	Yeah, that's right.
	I can get deported if I don't fight for the United States.
	Think about that.
	Yeah. So, we need to understand, in many ways, a naturalized, you took natural and you eyes them.
	You naturalize them.
	Okay? It's equal, I would argue, even higher than natural born.
	Natural born citizens do not need to take this over.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah, it is so interesting, you know, back in, it's something that's talked about in terms of my Christian religion.
	We talk about the fact that God has adopted us.
	They point out that in Roman society, you could disown your natural born child.
	But if you had adopted somebody, you couldn't get rid of them.
	You couldn't disown and adopt a child, you know?
	So it's kind of the same argument that you're making there.
	So it's in Wisconsin and New Jersey right now where Lala is trying to rig the election.
	No, no. In New Jersey, it's Lala.
	In Wisconsin, it's Trump.
	Oh, really? Okay.
	Yeah, because... Whoever thinks they're going to have a chance at winning that state, right?
	Right. The point is that our candidacy, my candidacy, is the elephant in the room.
	We're not just some frivolous candidate.
	We have a movement. People know about me.
	People know I was the one who fought for people against, you know, the election fraud.
	People know that it was I who exposed the backdoor portal to Twitter.
	People know I was the one who fought against the lockdowns.
	Gooby Kennedy supported lockdowns.
	Trump supported lockdowns.
	Biden supported lockdowns.
	They know I'm the real fighter, David.
	Yeah. And they know that we're not going to just get five or ten votes like Roger Calero, that we're going to get hundreds of thousands of votes, which can, you know, disrupt this election.
	So both parties are violating the law and do not recognize the 12th Amendment or the 20th Amendment.
	That only Congress can qualify a candidate.
	And this is what's known in legal terms as a non-justiciable issue.
	That even the courts can't rule on it.
	It's a part of the political process.
	If you want Mickey Mouse on the ballot, and a bunch of electors want him on the ballot, and electors vote for that person, then Congress will have to say, well, Mickey Mouse, you know, he's a cartoon character, he can't be.
	Congress is what decides that.
	The states have no jurisdiction to They do not have any jurisdiction to qualify the potentially pledged candidate of the Office of Electors.
	It's like fundamental constitution.
	And it's amazing how many judges don't know this.
	How many lawyers don't know this.
	I was speaking to Ralph Nader's lawyer for 30 years.
	He goes, oh my God, Shiva, you're absolutely right.
	He goes, this makes no sense.
	They have no right to take you off the ballot.
	They can go after the electors.
	If the electors weren't residents, if they weren't citizens, I don't know.
	But you're, it's presumptive.
	They're putting the cart before the horse.
	Yeah, that's right.
	And what we have, the fake electors, the issues with that, of course, is the electors have to be declared by some legal authority.
	Typically the board of elections.
	As I said, when they were contesting this, if the, you know, there were four states, Republican legislatures, two of them had Republican governors.
	I said they wanted to contest that.
	They could have, since they weren't having any luck in the courts, they could have gone to the legislature.
	If the legislature would have said, we recognize that slate of electors, then you would have had a determination would have to have been made in Congress on January the 6th as to which slate of electors were they going to recognize?
	Yeah. Exactly. The ones that came from the legislature or the ones that came from the governorship.
	And I've got all these people that I've talked to, Republicans, don't get that either.
	They don't understand that, you know, it has to be a recognized slate of electors and it's the slate of electors that is sent to Washington.
	I told people in 2020, I said, you know, when you look at election corruption, long before you have all the issues about counting votes and custody of the voters...
	That's way at the end of the process. Yeah, the beginning, it all begins, election corruption begins with ballot access, and that's exactly what you're fighting.
	Yeah, I agree. Exactly.
	So we, to let everyone know...
	Be defiant.
	We will be, except for four states, write us in.
	Write in Dr. Shiva.
	Dr. Shiva, write us in.
	And about 15 states will be listed on the ballot session now, David, unless Kamala Harris and Trump...
	Go do this. You know, when I decided to run, Reince Priebus told a friend of mine who he's on the board of, he said, oh my God, Dr.
	Shiva's running. This is going to be disrupted.
	That's from Reince Priebus.
	Yeah. Right? And it's quite telling that none of these podcasters, in fact, none of the so-called anti-Zionist podcasters dare put me on their show.
	And if you look at my followers on Twitter, 366...
	On Facebook, whatever, 520, 540.
	On YouTube, 250.
	Has stayed the same for two years, David.
	Oh, yeah. Tell me about it.
	I've stayed the same for eight years.
	There you go. They capped me, and I look at people.
	I see videos that come up, and it's like, why am I seeing this?
	I look at the fact that they've got like 4,000 people have seen whatever it is that they've got there.
	And yet they've only got 900 followers.
	It's like, how in the world do I have only a couple hundred people have seen this when I'm supposedly got 136,000 followers?
	They're obviously curating the content.
	And that really is the issue.
	And so, yeah, I'm glad to have you on.
	People need to understand what this is.
	And let's understand what the time frame is on this as well.
	So where are you right now in New Jersey?
	The time frame is... Ballots get printed.
	Remember, military around mid-September, which means they're designing the ballots, which means all of this is right now.
	So anyone listening... Number one, you know, hit up everyone you know.
	Tell them to go to shivaforpresident.com.
	Download our cards, shivaforpresident.com slash cards.
	Start handing out our write-in and our vote cards everywhere.
	We have to disrupt these guys.
	They need to know that we, the people, are a disruptive force.
	That's what our campaign represents.
	All of these elections or selections right now...
	The Zionist swarm is deciding who will give them the better benefits.
	Will it be Kamala Harris or will it be Trump?
	So Trump is, you know, bending over to them in any way possible.
	He took $100 million from Sheldon Adelson's wife, right?
	He'll probably go bomb the entire Middle East.
	Or he'll say he'll do that.
	Anything. And Kamala Harris and that plan, it's basically two wings of the swarm deciding how much they're going to serve an entity which has nothing to do with the United States, except to get us into war.
	War leads into printmaking.
	Printing money leads to inflation, which increases cost of living.
	So you have cost of living going up, you have lifespan going down.
	That's what the swarm has gotten you.
	The only force against that is Sheba for President and the movement for Truth, Freedom, Health and all of you.
	We need to build a bottoms up movement.
	That's the only way forward.
	And the thing I want to say, David, is you're one of the few people who puts us on.
	Podcasters. You know, I have an interview with Mike Adams coming up.
	You know, Mike will put us on to the extent where people say, hey, you better put Dr.
	Shiva on, okay, because Mike needs to maintain his credibility.
	I said before you came on, I had somebody put a comment on there and said, when are you going to have Dr.
	Shiva on? I said, funny you'd mention that.
	We got him coming up in the third hour or so.
	Yeah, but you will notice these so-called anti-Zionist pro-Palestinian guys are talking big game.
	Well, why aren't you supporting me?
	I'm the only anti-Zionist candidate.
	Because they're using anti-Zionism, many of these so-called anti-Zionists and pro-Palestinians, and they're making money off the deal.
	The anti-Zionist pro-Palestinian movement has been taken over by liberal Zionists who push, quote-unquote, ceasefire for 40 years.
	They don't want to talk about the real solution, which is end the occupation of America.
	That's what we should talk about.
	End the occupation of America by foreign influence and foreign governments.
	And Trump serves Israel.
	Kamala Harris serves Israel.
	Boobie Kennedy serves Israel.
	They do not serve the American working people.
	He says the quiet part right out loud.
	And of course you are the only real anti-vax candidate that is out there.
	Anti-lockdown as you point out as well.
	Not that. I'm the one who ran the biggest protest in New Jersey against Phil Murphy.
	And we stopped the anti-vax mandate bill.
	Boobie Kennedy was trying to negotiate with the Democrats.
	We did a massive militant protest and scared the hell out of them.
	So this is why they do not want one of us, David, coming up from below, fighting for us.
	So they have to anoint. That's what you're witnessing right now.
	Kamala Harris has to go after me in New Jersey.
	Trump has to go after me in Wisconsin.
	Because they do not want any independent movements.
	They don't want someone like me who came from nothing coming up, David, or us.
	That's what I represent.
	And that's what this is about.
	So this is a huge opportunity for people to get involved.
	You can write us in.
	Yeah, that's the key. It's got to come from the bottom up.
	And it's not just this.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	They had the mainstream media was begging her to do vaccine passports like France, and she said, well, you know, we put out the guidance and everything, but, you know, we turn it over to the local people.
	They bribed the local officials, and if you don't have good local officials who are principled and who are going to stand against this stuff, that's why I keep telling everybody, I cover national politics because I want people to focus from the bottom up, and that's what you're doing as well.
	You're getting what we've done is at every level.
	The reason we you know, one of our biggest reasons and the success of running for president. Now we have leaders in all communities all over the United States who've emerged bottoms up. And by the way, everyone who collects signatures for us, they all have full time jobs or they're retired people.
	You know, we didn't go and raise 20 million like Booby Kennedy did to go pay people to collect signatures for us.
	Everything we've done is bottoms up.
	Everything.
	So I really want to let everyone know that if you truly want to save yourself, no one's coming to save you.
	There's a movement that exists and we're the only game in town.
	Truthfreedomhealth.com because we will teach you, we'll give you the tools.
	It's not about me, it's not about anyone else, it's about you learning how to fight.
	And in order to learn how to fight, you have to understand the science of systems, these interconnections, who the swarm is, how the enemy operates.
	But without that knowledge, you're always going to be 10 steps backward, because I'll give you the next Trump, the next Booby Kennedy, the next Obama, the next fool, We'll talk a good game the next Bernie Sanders.
	And their job is to distract you and make you fat, dumb, and lazy so you don't build a bottoms-up movement.
	They want you thinking that there's an easy way out.
	There's no easy way out. You've got to do your homework.
	You've got to get on the ground.
	You have to do the work. And that's how we win.
	There's no other way to win.
	We have to save ourselves. Very important.
	They're so clueless in terms of they don't understand.
	They use the labels, whatever they come up with.
	It's like, okay, well, we'll call this woke.
	And so, yeah, we'll call the Marxist approach as used by Mao.
	We'll call that woke. We'll wear the red hats and all the rest of the stuff.
	And it's like they don't understand history.
	They don't understand what's happened in other countries.
	They don't understand the global agenda.
	They don't understand who the players are and what they stand for in America.
	And most importantly, They don't understand that it's all about local and going from the bottom up.
	Let me ask you, since I'm in Tennessee, are you going to be on the ballot in Tennessee?
	Yep, it looks like we're already on there, David.
	They told us we are.
	Good. Okay, well, good.
	I will show up then on election day.
	Give me a reason to go to the polls now.
	Yeah, look, when you vote for, when you vote for Shiva for president, you're what you're really saying is that I want to save myself and I want to build a bottoms up movement. And when you write us in, you're saying I don't believe in any of these guys and every vote we take away from them is a vote for you working people, realizing that your consciousness has been raised. That's a good thing.
	I agree.
	Every person who raises their consciousness understands this concept and votes she or her president. That's what they're really doing.
	They're saying, you know, I don't, the elections and here's a guy who's coming bottoms up.
	That's someone like me, my family, where I came up, and that's the kind of people we want to.
	You're actually voting for a bottoms up movement when you vote for a shooting president.
	Yes.
	Well, that's a great point.
	And you're getting off the plantation.
	Yeah, it's very important.
	And people can go to your website and sign up and get on the mailing list and find out what is going on with these ballot access cases.
	This is breaking news, and it is very important that we keep our ballots open.
	It's been one of my pet peeves, and again, I've seen the games that they play and how they keep people off the ballot.
	When we were in North Carolina, they would collude with, believe it or not, the media organizations in North Carolina.
	They would actually have the debates run by them.
	And even though there was only going to be three candidates on the ballot, they would exclude the third candidate.
	You know, that was the media.
	You would think that they would want to have something that would be open and lively, but no, it's all controlled.
	And so it begins with the ballot access.
	Very interested to see what happens with us.
	We'll be following this. Thank you so much for what you're doing.
	Thank you for coming on.
	Thanks, David. Thanks for having us on.
	Thank you. Thank you.
	Be well, David. Best of you and Travis.
	Thank you. Thank you very much.
	Shivo4PresidentFolks.com.
	You can go there and keep up with what is happening.
	Things are breaking very fast for him.
	But it's good to know that somebody has at least take a look at the organization that he's got and try to get things done from the bottom up.
	And so when we look at what is happening across the country, I'll just mention this real quickly.
	I won't have time to get into it today.
	But I thought it was interesting.
	People don't know what is happening.
	One example of this is civil asset forfeiture.
	I said years ago when Megyn Kelly, who was a bigwig at Fox at the time before she was, I don't know, she quit or she was fired, I don't remember.
	But she came to interview Alex and she interviewed all of us.
	And in our discussion, I mentioned civil asset forfeiture.
	She did not know what that was.
	She supposedly is a lawyer by background.
	But she really doesn't care.
	So here's an example. The cops pulled over a FedEx Express truck.
	They opened up the package.
	It had $42,000 inside and they just decided they would keep it.
	They said, the FedEx driver said, basically it's a court fight in Indiana.
	They were inspecting a package that was routed by FedEx through its hub there.
	They opened it up and found $42,000 in cash and just kept it.
	This is called civil asset forfeiture.
	They claim that they can keep the property without charging you with a crime, without finding you guilty, because they're going to do this as a civil process.
	Something that is a rule that was passed by the bureaucracy, not a law that was passed by your elected representatives.
	Again, do elections mean anything if we are ruled by the bureaucrats?
	Do elections mean anything if they can keep us off the ballot?
	Do elections mean anything if any of these bureaucrats can steal whatever they wish from you and say that you have to sue them in order to get it back?
	We have taxation with our representation, we have regulation, and we have confiscation with our representation.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, That means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com.

▲