Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 10, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:29

The David Knight Show - 07/10/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Night Show.
	At the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday the 10th of July, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at the strange things that happened in foreign elections because they kind of look similar to what might be about to happen here as well.
	We're also going to take a look at the continued push for a new pandemic.
	And folks, it's not just the left.
	We've got the Heritage Foundation out there.
	Remember these Project 2025 people?
	Well, maybe their project for 2025 or beyond is to have another pandemic.
	They're pushing it, and they're pushing Redfield very, very hard.
	And then we're going to take a look at new WarTech, autonomous killing machines, using kind of off-the-shelf, cheap technology.
	Very concerning what is coming our way.
	And there's not any stopping it, quite frankly.
	We'll be right back.
	I said when I talked about the results of the French election over the weekend, I said, isn't it interesting that Le Pen's party just trounced Macron's party for the European Parliament elections?
	And then in the first round, they did it again.
	Well, the reports that we got were not about vote totals.
	They were about seats that were won.
	And that's the key.
	You see, Le Pen's party won the most votes, but they came in third in terms of seats.
	And it's not something, you know, we have this discussion in the United States about the Electoral College versus the popular vote.
	And I'm on the side of the Electoral College versus the popular vote.
	Because the purpose of the Electoral College is to make sure that you don't have a couple of high-density population centers decide the election.
	I've talked about this many times.
	Just to quickly summarize, if you substitute for the Electoral College a popular election, you'll have New York, Chicago, and LA picking the president.
	That's the only place that they'll campaign, the only thing they'll pay any attention to.
	Especially because the vote totals there are not going to be very honest, but they didn't even bother to rig the vote totals in France despite receiving 1.7 million fewer votes than the Nationalist Party The conservatives if you will the Le Pen party the new popular front the far left was awarded the most seats of any party and
	Then Macron coming in second place This all came as a result of a backroom deal You see what they decided that they would do Macron made an alliance with the left And they said, we'll strategically drop out our candidates in certain areas to make sure that, you know, you win seats or that I win seats and that type of thing.
	And so they were able to, by manipulating and not dividing the vote amongst the leftists, they were able to get more of their people effectively elected.
	And so that's the way this thing rolled out.
	But it's not being reported that way.
	That's one of the key things that's very interesting.
	You know, the Daily Skeptic in the UK said what the BBC won't tell you is that Le Pen's national rally was the only party to actually increase its vote share in the second round.
	So, it's even worse.
	Like I said before, they trounced Macron's party in the European Parliament elections.
	They came in first place in the first round, and then in the final round, they actually went up, even though they dropped to third place, based on that alliance between Macron and the leftists.
	And of course, the leftist party...
	The New Popular Front is itself an alliance with the Socialist Communist Party, the Green Party, and all these other radical leftists.
	So they had every radical aligned against the National Rally Party.
	The National Rally Party, said the Telegraph, has been beaten by a ragtag alliance called the New Popular Front, comprising Jean-Luc Melanchthon's hard-left France unbowed, the Communists, the Greens, and the Socialists.
	But even more humiliatingly, Le Pen's party appeared to have been beaten by Macron's Centrist Together alliance, which polls had predicted would flounder in third place.
	Well, that's not what happened.
	That's what the mainstream media in the UK tells people.
	It's what the BBC told people.
	But as the Daily Skeptic said, for anyone with even a passing familiarity with French politics, this was exactly the outcome we'd expected, and it wasn't a shock.
	The leftist alliance didn't stage any unexpected comeback, and Le Pen's party wasn't beaten into third place by Macron's alliance.
	To understand the consequences of the terms of parliamentary seats, They wrote an article to talk about how that happened, but he said, in this particular Daily Skeptic article, he said, This is misreported by the mainstream media.
	And so again, to recap, Melanchthon's left alliance, this is the communists, the socialists, the greens, lost 2.4% between the first and second round, between the first round and the final round, put it that way.
	While the national rally's share increased by 3.8%.
	So even though the ones who came in first, their vote total dropped 2.5%, and the people who came in third, their vote total went up by about 4%.
	Not the outcome that you would guess from reading a BBC headline where they rejoice over that.
	He said, one of the things that we have learned from the COVID pantomime, and that's really what it was, not a pandemic, it was a pantomime, it was a pageant, is to never accept any news story at face value.
	It's often very easy to find the data that you allow, the data that allow you to answer the nagging question that comes to mind, am I being taken for a fool?
	And it's not just the ascendancy of the Socialists and the Communists and the Greens.
	Again, they're all the same thing.
	As I've said many times, if you look at the Green Party, and remember that red has always been the color of Communists.
	Always. That's why the American mainstream media assigned it to Republicans and went with blue for the Communist Party.
	And I mean that.
	I've said many times that the Republican Party is the Democratic Party of my youth.
	The Democrat Party is the Communist Party of my youth.
	No doubt about it.
	They should be using red.
	And the Greens are the Watermelon Party.
	They've got a thin veneer green, but on the inside they're all red, just like a watermelon.
	Well, Antifa...
	Won seats in European elections.
	Won seats in the French elections as well as in the European Parliament.
	You know, we've been told over and over again, it's just an idea.
	It's not an organized thing.
	And we've been told this by the Marxist Democrats.
	Jonathan Turley says, some Democrat leaders have embraced this violent movement, which continues to gain strength on campuses and its cities across the nation.
	It is also a global movement, and I've shown that to you as well, by the way.
	It's Mark Hall, documentarian, who showed me a picture from the 1930s.
	They haven't even changed their flag since the 1930s in Germany.
	And by the way, please pray for him.
	He's had some real health issues and had a very serious operation in his recouping.
	So, Mark Hall, if you would.
	And also for Karen, she had to have a hand operation earlier this week.
	It seems that things are getting better with it, but she's in a great deal of pain.
	So we'd appreciate your prayers for her as well.
	I meant to mention that yesterday.
	But... Back to Antifa.
	It's been around for a long time.
	It is an organized party.
	And it's got a flag that it hasn't changed for nearly a century.
	Isn't that interesting? The Anti-Fascist Action League goes back to the 1930s in Germany.
	Antifa originated with the European anarchist and Marxist groups from the 1920s.
	And despite the denial of existence, as Jonathan Turley said, by people like Jerry Nadler and others, Turley said, I've long written and spoken about the threat of Antifa to free speech on our campuses and in our communities.
	This includes testimony before Congress on Antifa's central role in the anti-free speech movement nationally.
	Yeah, they'll beat up people if they don't like your speech.
	But look, the real threat to free speech is coming from our institutions.
	It's coming from the colleges themselves.
	It's coming from the college administration.
	Whether they do it to support Palestine or whether they do it to protect Jews on campus, either way, they're shutting down speech.
	And they've been doing it over whatever their political preferences are for a long time.
	Free speech is not allowed anymore.
	Not allowed by the media, not allowed by the colleges, not allowed by the Congress, by the federal government.
	They do nothing to protect any of this stuff.
	We have continued to follow the attacks and the arrests of Antifa followers across the country, including attacks on journalists.
	And, of course, they really got after Andy Ngo and Pacific Northwest.
	Was it Seattle? Portland? I can't remember.
	Former DNC Deputy Chair Keith Ellison, who is now the Minnesota Attorney General, and I will add, even though Jonathan Turley didn't put it there, he's now the Minnesota Attorney General because of Soros' money.
	We put him there. He once said that Antifa would, quote, strike fear in the heart of Trump, unquote.
	This was after Antifa had been involved in numerous acts of violence and its website was banned in Germany.
	Ellison's son, who is now a Minneapolis City Council member, Jeremiah Ellison, declared his allegiance to Antifa in the heat of the protests in the summer.
	During a prior hearing, Democrat senators refused to clearly denounce Antifa, falsely suggested the right was the primary cause of recent violence.
	Biden has also dismissed objections to Antifa.
	He says it's just an idea.
	An Antifa leader who was on France's national security watch list has now been elected to their national assembly after winning 55% of the vote.
	And then in Italy, you have a schoolteacher by trade from Milan elected to the European Parliament despite being arrested for taking part in organized attacks in 2023 in Budapest.
	So as that is happening, so you've got rigging the elections, essentially, and then the ascendancy of the radical, radical Marxist left.
	You have the Marxist jurisdiction of Paris.
	Remember, I've talked about the mayor and how Marxist she is.
	She is the one who began the 15-minute city.
	Right there in Paris. And of course we have the Paris climate accord and all the rest of this stuff.
	But this radical Marxist pushing this radical green agenda.
	And now, just like in New York, you've got prosecutors coming out of Paris that are now targeting Le Pen.
	Lawfare. You know, just like they did with Trump.
	I don't support Trump, but I don't support that kind of political persecution either.
	But that's what we're starting to see here.
	When you look at the UK... Keir Starmer won with only 20% of the possible vote.
	By Dr.
	Vernon Coleman, he says, statistically speaking, labor is surely already the least popular government in British history.
	Starmer and company received only 20% of the nation's votes.
	That means that 80% of the population did not vote for them.
	And he said, we now have a real bright red commie government.
	And so what's one of the first things that the commie government wants to do?
	Well, they want to release the prisoners, right?
	And create chaos.
	And that's what he's talking about doing.
	He might let out 40,000 prisoners because he says there's overcrowding.
	This is exactly what Soros wants to do here and has been doing with his district attorneys and his state attorneys general that he gets elected letting out the criminals on the street.
	Biden letting the criminals into the country.
	And, of course, that's what these open border situations are about throughout America, throughout Europe.
	It's to allow chaos to come in, criminals and chaos to come in, unabated.
	And so, it's to ease overcrowding.
	Wait a minute, we're overcrowded, why do we have open borders here?
	Well, that's their prisons, they say.
	And then when you look at Russia, so many conservatives love to cheer Putin.
	It's just amazing to me.
	I mean, you look at how Tucker Carlson is just fawning over Russia.
	It's disgusting.
	We've now had Putin arrest the widow of Alexei Navalny, the guy that died in prison.
	Her name is Yulia, like Julia, right?
	And she's been arrested on the same charges that they threw her husband into prison for.
	Extremism. He was serving a 19-year prison sentence on the charge of extremism.
	How's that? You want to support somebody like that?
	You want to support somebody like Putin?
	Just unbelievable.
	Unbelievable. Yeah, this spy who imprisons people for essentially life.
	Because they're his political opponent.
	A court in Moscow has issued an arrest warrant for the widow of opposition leader Alexei Navalny on charges of extremism.
	The charges brought against Yulia, who lives outside of Russia, charges are brought in absentia.
	They're to do with her alleged participation in an extremist society.
	Navalny was Russia's most significant opposition leader of the past decade.
	He died in February in the Arctic Circle Jail.
	Russian authorities said he died of natural causes, but his widow said that he had been tortured, starved, cut off, and killed by Putin.
	And so now, she has been charged with extremism.
	Extremism. And that is something that is waved around as they want to Take things from any of us.
	Our ability to speak, our ability to interact with people, to ban us from banks, although they don't bring these charges, they just do.
	Here's a new style, okay?
	You don't bother to charge anybody with anything.
	You don't bother to convict them with anything.
	You just go ahead and take whatever you want from them.
	This is the precedent that was set up with civil asset forfeitures, one of the reasons I've talked about that so much.
	It's absolutely outrageous that a government would be able to steal stuff from you.
	It's not forfeiture. It's theft.
	It's theft. It's government theft.
	It's outrageous that they'd be able to steal things from you without finding you guilty, without even charging you with a crime.
	And yet, what are they doing when they de-platform us?
	There's no... I've been kicked off multiple times on multiple platforms.
	Never given an answer.
	Never given a charge. Never an ability to answer to any of this stuff.
	I played for you the other day. This guy who's getting censored on YouTube.
	And he said, wait a minute. They've now, you know, they make it available so you can see the parts that they object to so you can cut them out.
	He goes, they want me to censor myself.
	All I'm doing is showing some guitar licks here.
	I'm doing hammers and hammer-ons and pull-offs and slides and things like that.
	So that's not anything that is, you can't copyright that.
	He said, even if he were to play some of these guitars that he's talking about, even if he were to play their music and comment on it, that's protected under fair use.
	But I've been getting that treatment since 2013.
	And I've been kicked off of these platforms, financial, social media, you know, video platforms, you name it.
	Never given an answer.
	This is the kind of stuff that is happening.
	So we see that in Germany, the AFD party, Members are banned from owning guns and a new court ruling.
	And they just removed the party's bank account.
	Just debanked that.
	It's happening everywhere.
	It's absolutely insane that we allow this type of thing to happen.
	And all anybody can talk about...
	Are the personalities and the health issues of these puppets that we call President.
	It's absolutely amazing to me.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	I'm back.
	you They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidNightShow.com Well, thank you for listening.
	We'll see you next time.
	Bye.
	seven-time Wimbledon champion Novak Djokovic, and of course he could have won the Grand Slam, except he was prevented from being able to participate because he refused to get a vaccine to be allowed to participate.
	He is still being booed, interestingly enough.
	And yet, who are we cheering?
	We're cheering Trump, we're cheering Biden, the people who locked us down.
	You've got a lot of people who are still cheering Fauci, as I pointed out yesterday.
	Jim Quinn was saying, I got into a conversation with somebody who said, hey, I'm fine.
	I made a lot of money off of that lockdown that Trump did and the PPP. And I got the jabs and I haven't died yet.
	So everything's fine. Look at my stock portfolio.
	And Fauci is a hero.
	That's when he lost it.
	I would have lost it too.
	But yeah, we take heroes like Djokovic, who stood up to this stuff.
	He gets booed, still, to this day.
	And so, after he won, he's there at center court after he won.
	BBC reports it.
	He says, well, have a good night.
	You guys can't touch me.
	He addressed them directly.
	He didn't just kind of sheepishly walk off.
	He took them on.
	That's what we need to do.
	He said, no, I'm not.
	The BBC interviewer said, well, I think they're saying Rune, Rune.
	They're not booing you. And he goes, no, no, they were.
	They were. I'm not accepting that.
	He said, no, I know they were cheering for Rune, but that's an excuse to also boo.
	He said, listen. I've been on the tour for more than 20 years.
	I know all the tricks. I focus on the respectful people that pay for the ticket and who love tennis and who appreciate the players.
	I played in much more hostile environments.
	Trust me, you guys can't touch me.
	That's what he said to them. He said, all the true tennis fans respect the players.
	Of course, you will support one player over another, and they have the freedom to choose who they back.
	If someone steps over the line, I react after the match.
	I said what I said.
	He said after a post-match press conference.
	But the other part where he took them on and said, you guys can't touch me.
	He did that right there in the stadium as they were booing him.
	Booing him why? Well, because he stood up for my body, my choice.
	See, this is the thing that bothers me so much, one of the many things that bothers me so much about the GOP candidates.
	Why don't they throw that back at these Democrats to a person?
	These people who are out there demanding abortion and saying, it's my body, it's my choice.
	There were also the people who said, you didn't have a choice about this stuff.
	You've got to take the vaccine to protect me and all the rest of this.
	They're not about freedom.
	They're not about my body, my choice.
	These are people of a death cult.
	They want depopulation.
	They want children killed.
	They want the elderly killed.
	They want them ripped apart or jabbed and poisoned.
	It doesn't really matter.
	And yet, you know, just as we see Djokovic being booed at Wimbledon, why is that happening?
	Well, because these people can't get past their paranoia.
	If you look at what is happening in the UK, they've now got several hospitals that are part of their national health system, the NHS, that are now reinstituting mask mandates because they can't get over this idea that the virus will find you.
	If you are unvaccinated and the virus comes into your community, the virus will hunt you out.
	The virus hunts down the unvaccinated.
	The virus will find the unvaccinated.
	That's what they all say. And it's a virus that will find you if you're not vaccinated.
	If you're unvaccinated, it will find you.
	The virus is literally finding unvaccinated people.
	It will find the unvaccinated.
	We're seeing COVID-19 tracking down unvaccinated people.
	Sounds like trials. You're unvaccinated and you're in circulation.
	You're going to get it. The Delta variant of COVID-19 has the potential to spread through an unvaccinated community like Wildfire.
	The Delta variant is so aggressive.
	If you are unvaccinated, it's going to find you.
	Delta is finding the unvaccinated.
	The Delta variant will find you.
	If you're not vaccinated, it will find you.
	The virus tends to find places that are under-vaccinated.
	It does not just move to city centers.
	It finds the unvaccinated wherever they are.
	So you might live in the middle of the desert, but it can still find you.
	But if you're unvaccinated, this virus is looking for you.
	You know, this virus, this infection will seek out the people who are either unvaccinated or have only had one jab and are not fully protected.
	The virus does seem to be finding older people who have not received that third dose.
	We'll ultimately find just about everybody.
	But these three people, two of them weren't vaccinated.
	One had just had the first dose.
	The virus has found them The good clip HA HA!
	It's so funny. You know, we played in the past, we played those stations that are part of the Sinclair Group, all these conservative stations, and they were all saying the same talking points.
	Look, the government is the virus, right?
	The government is the disease.
	The government is the pandemic, and the government will find you, is what they're trying to tell you.
	Pushing that fear.
	Well, the pro-mask cultists are at it again.
	In the height of summer, no less, three healthcare providers are trying to reimpose their own mask requirements to the obvious glee of the BBC, says the Daily Skeptic.
	Masks reintroduced at hospitals over a rise in COVID, says the BBC. That's their headline.
	Well, we've also been told in the United States that Lala Harris' husband Who's been supposedly jabbed multiple times and boosted multiple times, that he now has COVID again.
	So be very afraid. They're pushing this everywhere.
	And it's not just COVID. We have all kinds of pathogens that you have to be jabbed for now.
	Missouri State is going to require all the dairy cows in the state fair to be tested for bird flu.
	Maybe their slogan will be, the virus will find moo.
	Because it hasn't found any cows yet in Missouri.
	Not a single cow has tested positive, even with their rigged PCR tests.
	I am so sick of this PCR test.
	I wish I'd never heard the phrase, I've talked about this forever, I'm disgusted.
	With this PCR thing.
	How many times are they going to pull this scam on people and they still can't understand what's going on with the PCR test?
	They magnified it with Trump 1.1 trillion times.
	40 cycles. 40 cycles.
	Each time through, they double it.
	Right? To the 40th power.
	1.1 trillion times.
	You can find anything.
	They can find the virus with the PCR. Right?
	What they should have said is the PCR will find whatever we want it to find.
	The state of Missouri is now requiring all state fair dairy cows to be tested with the polymerase chain reaction, the PCR. If only they hadn't killed Kerry Mullis.
	And I believe they did.
	It was just too coincidental, the timing of his death, right before, just right before they pulled this thing off.
	He was adamant to oppose Fauci when Fauci first used this stuff to claim that AIDS was caused by a virus.
	He said, no, you can't prove that.
	He said, you can find anything.
	You can't prove that just because this is there, you can't prove that.
	You test with the PCR test.
	You can find whatever you want, especially if you magnify it enough.
	From the Missouri State Veterinarian, Steve Struberg.
	They have a Missouri State Veterinarian.
	That's part of the problem. We don't need Surgeon Generals.
	We don't need State Veterinarians.
	Absolutely do. Nothing but problems are going to come from that.
	He said this. He said these health requirements are in place for the 2024 Missouri State Fair in an effort to protect the dairy industry and all agriculture.
	That's to protect it, not to kill it off, right?
	Well, maybe it is there to protect the dairy industry, but not the dairy farmers.
	Not the local guys.
	Not the small farmers, but the big guys.
	That's what all regulations are ultimately about, you know.
	It's to protect the big guys.
	But here's the kicker.
	He also admitted, there have been no cases of bird flu detected in Missouri dairy cattle.
	Still, he said, we want to operate in a manner of caution while allowing dairy exhibitors the opportunity to show their animals.
	How many cows have you tested?
	How much have you magnified this with?
	And of course, we had a whistleblower from Europe that called in to Adam Curry's show.
	Somebody forwarded that to me.
	And the guy said, look, I work for a company that sells these new digital PCRs.
	And they're actually magnifying stuff more than the 40-cycle PCR that we used back in 2024.
	So they're magnifying it even more than 1.1 trillion times.
	It's ridiculous. And even with that, they haven't found a single cow with bird flu, but they're going to say that you can't take your cattle to the state fair.
	And quite frankly, folks, since they're recklessly magnifying everything with this, and who knows if they're even testing for the right thing.
	But have they isolated the bird flu?
	Did they isolate COVID? I don't believe any of this stuff.
	None of it. This is as ridiculous as the CO2 is going to destroy the world story.
	All of this stuff is absurd.
	They take the most common things and they magnify them in people's imaginations to scare you to death and as an excuse for the most authoritarian things.
	Look, if you were foolish enough to take your dairy cattle to the state fair, all these people, all these individual farmers ought to just boycott the Missouri state fair.
	Because if you take it in with this phony test, this phony test, and you get a phony false positive, they'll kill your cow, probably.
	And maybe your entire herd.
	I wouldn't play that game if I was there.
	I wouldn't take it.
	What's the point of taking the cow?
	I'm sure that you've got an award-winning cow.
	Maybe that helps you.
	Maybe you can breed that cow out.
	Maybe there's some financial benefit that can be derived from that, but you're putting your entire herd at risk.
	And folks, if we play this game, whether you're a farmer or a consumer, if we play this pandemic game, everything we have is at risk.
	Everything. People should also avoid unprotected exposures to animal poop bedding unpasteurized raw milk or materials that have been touched by or close to birds.
	The bird is like an Alfred Hitchcock farce.
	Yeah, if you touch the poop, you may face the consequences.
	You may wind up with pink eye.
	Oh, the horror of it.
	Pink eye. Yeah.
	That's what's happened to these people.
	They came back and they said, whoa, you got a fourth person and he's got pink eye.
	And they all got pink eye.
	None of them have any respiratory issue.
	But now, even pink eye is bird flu.
	If it's somebody working at a dairy...
	Now, they haven't found any people working at a chicken farm that have pink eye that they could say is bird flu.
	I mean, it's just ridiculous.
	Isn't it so obvious to everybody that their target is meat and dairy?
	Their target is our food?
	Once bird flu enters a mass testing phase...
	We know that cases are going to spring up everywhere, writes shftplan.com.
	And of course, if you go to a dairy farm, you're quite likely to have a SHFT to meet.
	It's not going to hit the fan.
	It's going to hit the PCR test.
	And the PCR will find the virus.
	We will find you.
	They're going to make that line from Last Awakens.
	They're going to make that line despicable.
	Anyway, why the next pandemic will be worse than COVID. Who's this coming from?
	Is this coming from the BBC? Is it coming from CNN, New York Times, Washington Post?
	No, it's actually coming from the largest conservative think tank in America.
	Their publication, The Daily Signal.
	Heritage Foundation is pushing this.
	The same people, they were talking about Project 2025.
	And look, you know, this whole thing about, we want a bloodless revolution.
	You know, now Trump is running scared from that.
	Heritage Foundation, again, I'll never forget the fact that they invited it to the Trump Rose Garden.
	When Infowars got purged in 2018, all the accounts taken down within about a 12-hour period.
	No reasons given.
	And so, to celebrate free speech, what Trump did is he had a rose garden party, and he brought in all these people who had not been censored.
	And he brought in the Heritage Foundation, Cato Institute, the two biggest conservative and libertarian think tanks.
	And they said, yeah, corporations can do whatever they want.
	No problem. And so now they've got Robert Redfield and an interview with him at the Heritage Foundation's Daily Signal.
	And they're pushing all the lies that he's been telling people everywhere.
	They're pushing it without any question whatsoever.
	They've become a propaganda arm for all this stuff.
	This is why I say the GOP is worse than Democrats.
	Worse than the Democrats.
	Why? Because they gain your confidence.
	I've said it many times. They'll stab you in the back or in the arm.
	Because, hey, it's Trump.
	Trust Trump. He's got the good vaccine.
	It's just sugar, water, plus aluminum, plus mercury, plus all the things that I've been telling you for decades, said Alex.
	You know, all the things I've told you are going to give your kids autism and all the rest of this stuff, causing all these problems with other vaccines.
	It's just going to be sugar, water, plus those adjuvants.
	Aluminum, mercury. You can take a little bit of aluminum or mercury in your veins, right?
	Do it for Trump. Take it not because of science, that Fauci says, but because Alex Jones says it's because Trump.
	And other people like him.
	The Heritage Foundation.
	Wayne Allyn Root.
	You got Mark Levin.
	You got Ben Shapiro. Take it.
	It's Trump. Take it because Trump.
	We're going to have another pandemic, says Trump's CDC director, Redfield, telling the Heritage Foundation.
	Well, another pandemic?
	I don't think we've had the first one.
	We had a pandemic of lies about the virus finding you, and we're about to have another pandemic of lies being brought to you by conservatives.
	He says, and this is going to be much more catastrophic.
	COVID's mortality was about 0.6%, he said.
	No, he's overstating that.
	And it wasn't COVID that was killing people.
	It was the rules that Redfield and Trump and his ilk put out there.
	Denying people treatment.
	Then giving them things that would exacerbate their condition, like an invasive ventilator that would kill most of them.
	Giving them something that didn't work.
	That had very serious side effects.
	Remdesivir. So that Fauci and Rand Paul could make money off of this stuff.
	He said bird flu's mortality is going to be north of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%.
	It's going to be catastrophic.
	Well, you know, before he was saying 25% to 50%.
	Now he's saying 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%.
	They're making this stuff up.
	It's just like the efficacy numbers for the vaccine.
	The casualty numbers.
	The efficacy numbers. There's no science to any of this stuff.
	And what's really reprehensible...
	Is it the Heritage Foundation?
	Won't question him about this.
	Director Redfield, how do you know?
	How do you know any of this stuff?
	It hasn't jumped to humans.
	We haven't had one human get sick, even though you guys are killing chickens left and right and freaking out everybody for the last couple of years.
	Nobody is sick with this stuff.
	Nobody has died with this stuff.
	Where are you getting these ideas that, well, eventually it's going to become human, and then we're going to have, it's going to jump to humans, and then it's going to be 25 to 50 percent fatality rate.
	Ask him where he comes up with this stuff.
	Instead, Heritage Foundation, who supported censorship.
	Remember that. Never forget that.
	Never forget that the Cato Institute, Reason Magazine, Heritage Foundation, all these people.
	Oh, I'm a proud conservative.
	I'm a proud libertarian.
	I support liberty. Not free speech.
	Not if we don't like what you're saying.
	Not if a corporation wants to shut you down.
	They support corporations doing whatever corporations want.
	The Democrats support government doing whatever government wants.
	And guess what? The governments and corporations are working together.
	And we knew that from the beginning.
	And we still know it, even though the Supreme Court wants to pretend that they don't see anything.
	Redfield said, this is why I've called for a moratorium on gain-of-function research.
	Well, he's called for it, but nobody's stopping it, right?
	They like the gain-of-function research being there because it gives them plausible deniability.
	He said that he blamed the communist government in Beijing for the epidemic.
	You see, that's why they like gain-of-function.
	You can blame somebody else for this.
	It was a gain of lies.
	It was just nothing there.
	Nothing there. But don't blame Trump for the lockdown.
	It was the Chinese government that locked us down.
	Well, here's the thing.
	The problem for these people is that if it really was the Chinese government, then they completely owned Trump and Redfield.
	Why are we pretending otherwise?
	On Rockfin...
	Wild Niagara says, tip for David, check out Chris Sky on YouTube.
	He ran for mayor against the communist candidate in Toronto and lost.
	He now has left Canada for Turkey, hoping for a better future.
	Well, yeah, a lot of times you're jumping out of the frying pan into the fire.
	My idea is to stay and fight.
	Rumble. Travagline says the monsters want to kill the cows so the monsters can make us eat fake cancer-causing meat.
	That's right. Yeah, it's a tumor burger.
	It's a tumor burger.
	To quote Schwarzenegger.
	Of course, I imagine when Gates starts selling his tumor meat, you know, it's set up to constantly reproduce.
	It's a tumor. It's a tumor.
	But I'm sure that they'll get him to do his line from, what was it?
	I forget what it was.
	Kindergarten cop or something.
	He was feeling sick and some kid says, maybe it's a tumor.
	It's not a tumor!
	So I'm sure they could get him to do a public service announcement for Bill Gates' imaginary meat.
	And, you know, try it.
	It's not a tumor. You'll like it.
	Rumble. AP Rumble Seat says, I guess malnutrition is on the wish list also for these maniacs.
	They're blocking real food and access to a balanced diet.
	Starvation 101. That's it.
	You know, when you look at both the green agenda and their attacks on farms.
	Oh, well, you know, CO2, methane, nitrogen, gas.
	We've got to shut the farms down, right?
	Seen that all over Europe. Saw that in the Netherlands.
	Now in Denmark, they're taxing cow farts and stuff.
	You know, just nonsense.
	Absolute nonsense. Why are people putting up with this stuff?
	I just don't have any patience for this anymore.
	I sound like a cranky old guy.
	I want the government off my lawn.
	Get off my lawn.
	Get off my farms.
	Get off. Go away.
	Go away. And then you've got Netherlands.
	You've got Denmark. They're coming after it.
	But now, you know, then they have another reason to come after the cows.
	Oh, well, it's bird flu.
	If it's not some of the most common things in the world, like nitrogen gas...
	Or if it's methane or CO2, which is actually not all that common.
	It's only 0.04% of the Earth's atmosphere.
	And the man-made CO2 is only 3% of that.
	But if it's not those common gases that are out there, well, then let's come after the cows for some kind of a pandemic idea.
	You see, both the pandemic MacGuffin and the...
	The climate MacGuffin.
	They're both converging on cows now.
	They're both converging on our food supply, especially.
	DGA says, David, the right goes to sleep when Republicans are in charge, making tyranny much easier because they trust them.
	Exactly. Trust the plan.
	Trust the plan. It's 4-D chess.
	As a matter of fact, I've got a...
	Don't have it with me today.
	I was going to do another...
	Trust the plan thing.
	That was so obvious what QAnon was doing, wasn't it?
	Especially when you go back and you look at what the Bolsheviks did.
	They actually called the group that was going to rope people in.
	They called it the trust.
	Because they were getting people's trust.
	They presented it as being like a financial trust or cooperative group, but actually it was just there to gain people's trust.
	They ran all of the opposition groups outside of Russia, the Bolsheviks did.
	And they even lured in the guy that was Ian Fleming's model for James Bond and killed him.
	And it's the same game that they played with the trust the plan the same game that Alex was doing with 40 chess and That's not the only time that's been done. There's actually a case that goes back to the early 19th century in the UK That was the same kind of rope-a-dope deal where the government creates the organization That and lays it out. That's what the FBI does all the time, right?
	They create this organization. They run it and then they arrest all the people that they that they entrap But can you continue on DG 8 so coming says Trump has killed the Tea Party movement People used to be united to stand against tyranny now trust Trump regardless of what he does trust the plan keep your enemies closer 3d chess, yeah Or, you know, like Blake Masters.
	It's now become a party that has just coalesced around a personality.
	And, you know, Blake Masters.
	He puts his sign up. I showed it the other day.
	Blake Masters. Pro-Trump, pro-Trump, pro-Trump.
	That's it. That's all that you need to know.
	He's pro-Trump. Well, the Colorado public health officials have now confirmed, wait for it, human plague.
	Human plague. The plague MacGuffin is back.
	They've confirmed a plague case in the state.
	Oh, no. We got plague now.
	We got trouble with a capital T. And that rhymes with P. And that stands for plague.
	Or pandemic or whatever.
	Plague is very rare, says ABC. With an average of seven human plague cases reported annually in the U.S. While the disease killed millions of people in Europe during the Middle Ages, nowadays it's a rare cause of illness.
	In rural areas in southwestern U.S., particularly New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, said the agency.
	Now, it's interesting.
	How did it go from killing millions of people to just being a rare thing?
	How do they stop it without vaccines?
	Who knows? I mean, it's just, it's crazy how this stuff works, isn't it?
	Boy, you'd almost imagine they don't know what they're talking about.
	So, we're going to take a quick break.
	I just want to remind you, if you're watching, whether you're watching live or you're watching recorded, please like the stream wherever you're getting the program.
	Please also go to thedavidknightshow.com if you want to There's a lot of different places that you can watch the program if you're having problems wherever you're watching it.
	That's always a place to go if we get shut down.
	You can go back to that.
	And there's also listed there places where you can support the program.
	And we really would like your support, really do need your support.
	Yet again, we're getting off to a very slow start this month.
	And some people have had some issues with Substack.
	And so Substack is really...
	This month it just isn't moving.
	So we haven't really moved the needle much, and we really could appreciate and use the support.
	So you can see the different places, links to the different places where you can go to support us.
	You can contribute if you've got a bank account that works with Zell.
	We've got the link there, CashApp.com.
	The subscribe star link is there.
	A lot of different places. We even have a P.O. box if you would like to send things by mail.
	By the way, a key point to let people know, just a little tip here.
	The U.S. Postal Service is going to go up this weekend on stamps.
	A 7% jump.
	Yeah, we don't have any inflation, do we?
	7% jump. So, if you frequently mail things, or think you might in the future, go get some forever stamps right now before they raise them about a nickel, which is where they're going to go with this stuff.
	It's going to be 73 cents per envelope.
	It's ridiculous. We need to bring back Lysander Spooner.
	Where is Lysander Spooner when we need him?
	They did it.
	They got very expensive back in the mid-1800s, and he got upset about it.
	So he went into competition with the post office, and one guy, one guy, was killing him.
	And so they went before Congress and got Congress to give them a monopoly because they couldn't, wouldn't compete.
	And so that's where we are today.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Making sense.
	It's common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alright, let's take a look at what's going on with Big Pharma.
	With the jabs, over 1,600 doctors and scientists are calling for an immediate suspension of COVID shots.
	We're the politicians on all this stuff.
	And the most that we've had is DeSantis in Florida and his Surgeon General, Latipo, who have said, no, we're not recommending it.
	But we need to stop it.
	It's not enough just to not recommend it.
	To me, that goes back to the kind of cynical attitude of Laura Loomer, who said, well, if you took that Trump shot, and if your family member died or you got hurt from it, that's on you.
	I didn't take it. I knew better.
	She's sitting there cheering on Trump.
	Like I said, you just put the stuff out there, and it's like, okay, well, let me just lay some food out here for you.
	Oh, you ate the poison stuff?
	Well, that's too bad, isn't it?
	I knew not to eat that stuff.
	I wasn't going to tell you that it was poison.
	No, no. I know it's poison, but I'm not going to tell you.
	Or I know it's poison, but I'm going to tell you it's sugar water.
	Yeah. Disgust me.
	Well, we now got 1,600 medical doctors, scientists, academics...
	I've signed a statement calling for the immediate suspension of this.
	This is what they say. A growing body of evidence suggests the widespread rollout of the Trump shot, the novel COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.
	No, it's a Trump shot. It's a Trump shot.
	He's proud of it. Let him have his credit.
	I'm the father of the vaccine.
	I pushed him so hard.
	They say it's contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths.
	But nevertheless, we should vote for the two tyrants that bribed and blackmailed people into getting it.
	Not only did they give you no word of caution, they gave you every assurance, and you've got all these people now supporting Trump.
	You've got people like Al Mohler.
	He's president of the Southern Baptist's biggest theological seminary.
	And he does a regular podcast on politics.
	He's writing about politics and Europe and all the rest of the stuff.
	He has no discernment at all about any of this stuff.
	That's the most charitable way to look at what he did.
	Because just like you saw these people saying, the virus will find you, the virus will find you, the virus will find you.
	Al Mohler was one of these voices out there, Franklin Graham as well, echoing what Yale had put together with the NIH on how to sell this to people.
	They actually had people, Trump supporters like Robert Jeffress, who worked with Curtis Chang.
	Who was getting a lot of money from the Ad Council.
	Trump gave them $250 million to tell people, when it comes up, it's the loving thing to do.
	You want to love your neighbor.
	Science is a miracle.
	This is like a moonshot.
	It's like, yeah, it is like a moonshot, if you know what I mean.
	Right? For those of us who don't believe in the moonshot, it is just like the moonshot.
	But it was a very cynical lie.
	You're going to set up...
	I mean, look, if he wants to go out there and talk about religion...
	Fine. If he wants to talk about what he believes about Christ, go for it.
	I'm all for that. But if he's going to get in politics, he better get some discernment about that.
	Or shut up.
	People died because of the stuff that you sold them.
	You should be ashamed of yourself.
	And you should be ashamed of yourself for supporting these two tyrants that worked together like Tweedledee and Tweedledum.
	Which one do you like? Do you like President Tweedledee or do you like President Tweedledum?
	They were both out there hawking this stuff.
	The difference was one of them was bribing people.
	The other one was blackmailing people over this pandemic, then over the vaccine.
	And they were doing it for who?
	They were doing it for the globalists.
	And who did the globalists work for?
	Satan himself. Folks, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that when you look at the people that are running these globalist organizations, when you look at the people who are running our government, the CIA and that ilk, they are occultist groups.
	They are Satanists.
	Forget about Lucian Greaves.
	He's a clown, okay?
	He's out there. He's trying to...
	They don't believe any of that stuff, but tell you what, these people in the upper levels, they do.
	They've sold their soul for this stuff.
	You can do all the videos you want about all the entertainers who said they sold their soul to Satan.
	Probably did. Probably consciously did it.
	Probably did it in some kind of a ritual.
	You don't think these people who are running these organizations, these political organizations, have done it in a far more serious way?
	This new technology was granted emergency use authorization, says the letter, to address a situation that no longer exists.
	The burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren't resulting in net harm.
	Have you seen anybody ask Trump or Biden about this?
	Do you still advocate for these vaccines, President Trump?
	How about you, President Biden?
	You still want to mandate them for people?
	Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution, says the statement.
	Scientists also say fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded.
	What principles?
	Well, things like first, do no harm.
	Things like informed consent.
	Things like bodily autonomy.
	You know, my body, my choice.
	Throw that back at these abortionists.
	And the notion that adults protect children, not the other way around.
	Well, these are adults who rip babies apart.
	What do you expect? What do you expect?
	Oh, seriously. You know, we look at this.
	This is more than a political football when you talk about abortion.
	It's more than a political football.
	How do I navigate this?
	Well, I'm for the exceptions, as Trump says, or whatever.
	How do I win an election?
	How do I please these people over here without alienating these people over there?
	Where can I sit on the fence?
	You got a place where I can sit on the fence?
	This is a litmus test for what they will do to you.
	If these people will rip a baby apart, you don't think that they'll inject you with a poisonous jab when it's in their political interests?
	You don't think they'll mask you up, tell you to stay six feet apart, lock down, all the rest of the stuff?
	It is a litmus test of where these people are coming from.
	They have absolutely no regard for human life.
	They have no regard for the most innocent among us.
	They will have no regard for you whatsoever.
	That's one of the reasons why I talk so much about abortion.
	It's not just a side issue.
	It's not something that stands by itself.
	It is fundamental to their attitude towards other human beings.
	Towards you.
	Because you don't mean anything to them.
	You are...
	How is it that Trump put it?
	You're non-essential. Hillary said you're deplorable.
	Trump said you're non-essential.
	We ultimately seek a renewed commitment, says the statement, to the core principles of ethical medicine, returning to an era in which we strive for transparency, accountability, and responsible decision-making throughout the spheres of medicine and public health.
	There is no such thing, folks, as public health.
	There's individual health.
	Individual health.
	And if you don't care about the health of the individual, don't talk to me about public health.
	That's an excuse to say that the individual doesn't matter, that the human being doesn't matter, that some agenda that is bigger than them, some group, some imaginary group that is bigger than them, The public is nothing but a collection of individuals, and if the individuals don't matter to you, the public health doesn't matter to you either.
	So, yeah, so let's go vote for the guys who did this to us, right?
	Everybody's going to fight. We're going to have a civil war over the people.
	Two guys who did the same thing to us about this stuff.
	Really? Well, I won't be marching in that parade.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene got a viral post.
	She put up on July 3rd a post that said the COVID vaccines are killing people.
	That was July 3rd, 2024, by the way.
	Not 2021. 2024.
	Better late than never, but yet the same person says Trump is our only hope, right?
	Marjorie Teller Green, who says the COVID vaccines are killing people, wants you to vote for Trump.
	Well, you talk about double speak, double think.
	This post has gotten four and a half million views, over 40,000 likes.
	And so, yeah, that's where we are now.
	It truly is Orwellian.
	Republicans confirmed their plan to let Social Security go insolvent, says Reason.
	Why am I talking about that here?
	Well, it's because Reason doesn't realize that this was about depopulation.
	The Republicans and Democrats have got a plan to save Social Security.
	You kill off the elderly people.
	You shorten people's life.
	You know, we've got to go back to foundational things, right?
	We've got to go back to when the age of Social Security was beyond life expectancy.
	That's the way that it began.
	That was Otto von Bismarck.
	You know, Social Security began in Germany.
	It was always a lie. They picked the age of 65 because that was beyond life expectancy.
	And so, let's get life expectancy down.
	Let's get the total number of people down.
	And we can keep Social Security solvent.
	They don't even care about that.
	These are people who are adding...
	I don't even know why reason is talking about this.
	We're adding a trillion dollars in debt every hundred days.
	Talk to me about Social Security.
	It's not that big compared to all the rest of this.
	I mean, we're going to add $4 trillion a year.
	That's not Social Security.
	But they've got that problem handled.
	They're going to reduce the number of people.
	No problem at all. But they will still have to tax us for income tax.
	Even though they can add, you know, $4 trillion a year to the debt, we've still got to pretend that the income tax is necessary so they can punish and control us with that.
	Meanwhile, in Australia, we see no justice for the unvaccinated cops there losing their jobs.
	This is in one jurisdiction in West Australia.
	The two years after the mandate ended, You have some cops who had said, well, I'm not going to get the vaccine.
	They said you're going to be fired. They appealed it.
	That thing got put on hold.
	Now, after two years, their Supreme Court has ruled that the West Australian police could be fired.
	Twelve police officers, five staff members have now been fired two years after the vaccine mandate ended.
	This one individual refused jabs due to his concerns over the safety, the efficacy, and the way in which the mandates violated the bodily integrity of officers and staff.
	You know, several years ago, all this stuff I was rolling through, I interviewed.
	I'm going to try to find these guys and see what happened with them.
	There was three cops I interviewed.
	I think one of them, at least one of them, maybe two of them were detectives.
	And one guy was seriously injured.
	As a result of the vaccine, he did get one vaccine, but he didn't get all of them, so he got fired.
	And they were in the middle of taking legal action against him.
	I need to go back and see what happened to those guys.
	It made me think about it when I saw these Australian cops lose their jobs.
	They were very smart, very articulate.
	But, you know, we're firing people left and right for not following Biden's mandates.
	Nobody wants to ask him about that in any debates.
	The military is ignoring members who are seeking justice after the unlawful vaccine mandate.
	Hundreds of families lost their careers, treated horribly.
	Nothing's being done there either.
	So, I mean, it's not just, you know, 20 cops in Western Australia.
	It's a tremendous number of people in the military.
	I have no idea how many.
	Of course, they don't tell you the truth about that either, how extensive it was.
	COVID shots are 200 times more likely to cause blood clots in the brain compared to all other vaccines.
	It's 1,000 times more likely to cause a blood clot than the flu vaccine, according to the CDC's own data, but they will not stop it.
	They won't stop it.
	You know, nobody's going to stop it.
	Just like they're not going to stop gain-of-function.
	They like to use gain-of-function to scare people.
	And then, just as we see this kind of stuff, people are able to analyze these public databases to some extent.
	The VAERS database and things like that.
	We knew this from the very beginning.
	I'll never forget, you know, when we got to, these jabs started in December of 2020.
	And by the beginning of January, you already saw, look at this, we've got more people reported on the VAERS system injured with this stuff than we have with all the other vaccines for a couple of years, you know, and just kept going up and going up and going up.
	And that wasn't enough to stop it.
	And Trump didn't care. I mean, Trump was doing his January the 6th thing.
	It was all about Trump.
	Trump, Trump, Trump. All the time.
	And yet, nothing being done about the people as you see people dropping dead, getting lifetime injuries, being put on the VAERS thing.
	Nobody cared. And so, the WHO also keeps records.
	And so, you had some investigators out of South Korea.
	And they now publish this in the Journal of Medical Virology.
	Peer-reviewed journal.
	What they did was they mined the publicly available data out of the WHO. They looked at 130 million reports.
	130 million reports.
	And their conclusion, peer-reviewed conclusion, is that the Trump shots triggered global heart deaths.
	It was a sage, as Fauci would say.
	And it's not like we didn't know this, right?
	But we just keep getting the receipts, keep coming in over and over again.
	We're three years into this.
	Pericarditis, myocarditis, both forms of inflammation of the heart.
	They restrict the body's ability to pump blood.
	Both conditions can cause cardiac arrest, strokes, blood clots, sudden death.
	The surge in cases of pericarditis and myocarditis were revealed in data from the World Health Organization.
	Researchers were able to unseal information from the database as part of their extensive investigations.
	They were able to analyze vaccine-associated pericarditis and myocarditis ranging from 1969 to 2023, looking at 130 million reports over that period of time.
	And what did they see?
	A massive surge, as Fauci would say.
	You know, we've known from the start of this, Trump didn't care.
	Trump's supporters didn't care.
	It just goes on and on, doesn't it?
	It absolutely is amazing. And they still don't care.
	That's what's... Still, the media doesn't care.
	Many of the voters don't care about it either.
	And so... They're also linked to an increase in all-cause mortality, and yet another study, this one coming out of Italy.
	The real impact of the vaccine campaign is the risk of all-cause death.
	This is out of data from the Italian national health care system.
	Interestingly enough, we knew from Italy, we knew that from the very beginning as well.
	We had two weeks worth of information out of Italy, where they were claiming, remember, they said it was a pandemic and it was in China, and then they said, and it's now gone from China to Italy.
	And we had two weeks worth of that data before Trump issued his executive order on Friday the 13th, March the 13th, 2020.
	And in that data, we saw that the handful of people that they claimed, first of all, the number of people, too small to call it an epidemic, certainly not a pandemic.
	But the handful of people that had died, that they claimed died with COVID, were past life expectancy, a couple of years past on average.
	And on average, they had two and a half other conditions that would normally kill them.
	And so we had two weeks worth of that information, and I reported it before it happened.
	I remember it was John Rapoport.
	Who broke that information.
	I had him on the show.
	We talked about it. And then, lo and behold, Trump locks everything down and calls it a pandemic because Fauci and Redfield and Birx told him had a simulation coming from the UK. A Philadelphia court is going to hear oral arguments in a vaccine fraud case.
	And this is not COVID. This is going back to MMR. Measles, mumps, rubella.
	You know, that... These childhood shots that started it.
	1986, Fauci got a Republican president, Ronald Reagan, to give the pharmaceutical companies immunity.
	He loves to work with...
	Fauci loves Republicans.
	They're like putty in his hands.
	Nobody suspects that they're on his side, right?
	And so he gave them legal immunity and...
	Now, Children's Health Defense has now brought a case.
	They said since the late 1990s, Merck has known that its MMR shot is significantly less effective than they say on their licensing and their product inserts.
	Just like we saw everybody lying about the efficacy of the COVID vaccine.
	Just like we see them lying about everything.
	And it's that fraud they are liable for.
	They're not liable for the childhood vaccines.
	But if they lie about the childhood vaccines, you've got them.
	You should be able to take these people out.
	Merck's own tests show that their MMR vaccine fell outside the specifications established by the FDA. And so the production of these vaccines should have stopped.
	And Merck should have suspended sales.
	And the defective vaccine should have been withdrawn.
	But none of that happens because the FDA is owned by the companies that they're supposed to regulate.
	The CDC and other purchasers of the defective vaccine.
	Remember, the CDC is one of the biggest marketers and retailers of vaccines.
	They've got a hand in all this as well.
	The whole medical industry is so unbelievably corrupt.
	The hospitals took all that payola from Trump being paid by Medicare, Medicaid, CMS. And the insurance companies are putting pressures, we've talked about multiple times, for the pediatricians to inject kids now.
	It's up to, I think, 90, 92 shots that you get first few years of life.
	Getting shot over and over and over again for things like MMR. That's how they get it up to 90 shots.
	Just keep giving it to them. Give it to them again.
	I don't care. Give it to them again. And if...
	The insurance companies see that a pediatrician is not getting a certain percentage of his patients vaccinated.
	He doesn't just lose the money that he would get for vaccinating them.
	What they do is they cut down all the money across the board on his practice.
	I mean, basically, the insurance companies are blackmailing the pediatricians.
	Say, I'm going to put you out of work.
	I'm going to not pay you a vast, forget what the percentage was.
	I reported this a couple of weeks ago.
	And I'm not going to, we're going to cut your payments by a large percentage enough to put them out of business.
	And so, you know, you're not just, when they look at you and see dollar signs, they don't just see the dollar signs for the five or six or ten jabs they're going to give you that day.
	They see their entire practice on the line.
	Because you've got the insurance companies, you've got the government, you've got the CDC, you've got all these people who are partners in this crime.
	None of this appears to have happened.
	They didn't withdraw it. They didn't stop the production.
	Nothing. In April 2012, a couple of virologists who were working for Merck in Pennsylvania became whistleblowers and they filed two separate lawsuits against Merck, alleging that it had falsified research data This is a lawsuit from whistleblowers on the inside.
	They said it enabled them to develop a monopoly on the MMR vaccine and to block any competition.
	So they come out and they play the same game that we saw earlier.
	As I pointed out, less than a week after the election.
	You have the election on Tuesday.
	You know, stop the sting stuff with Steve Pachenik began on Thursday.
	But then by Saturday, the media coronates Biden, says he's won the election.
	Then 60 Minutes rolls out a report they got in the can about how the military is going to get the vaccines out to everybody as soon as they say go.
	The very next day...
	Which is the Monday after the preceding Tuesday's election, Pfizer says, yeah, we're 90% effective.
	Russia the next day says, we're 92% effective.
	The next Monday, a week later, you have Moderna say, ours is 94% effective.
	The very next day, Pfizer says 94.5%.
	This whole thing was rigged from such obvious fraud.
	And so, evidently, what happened with the MMR vaccine is that Merck pushed up its efficacy numbers to push the other guys out of business and to get a monopoly.
	And as they point out, Children's Health Defense says an ineffective vaccine is dangerous because although these childhood diseases like measles and mumps are not any big deal if you get them when you're a kid, If you get them when you're older, they can be very serious.
	This is the big problem with the childhood vaccines.
	Well, it's a big problem, the fact that you're giving 90 of them to kids and we have an epidemic of autism and all the rest of the stuff.
	But it is also a huge issue when they don't convey any immunity that you would have normally had if you had gotten the disease as a child.
	Well, we've got a couple of comments and we've got a couple of tips.
	Thank you very much on Rockfin, Dustin Helm.
	Thank you. And on Rumble, Radisbro.
	Thank you. That's very generous.
	I appreciate that. He says, Post Office has been out of contract for more than a year.
	Can't even give us a decent wage increase while they charge Amazon $2 for any size or weight.
	And I'm delivering 90% Amazon working for USPS. Wow, that's amazing.
	Are you talking about crony capitalism?
	That's it. You know, Amazon, just like Merck, just like Pfizer, they know somebody on the inside, don't they?
	That's amazing. Going up and it's just become a delivery service for Amazon.
	It's crazy.
	Absolutely crazy. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Music In a world of deceit,
	Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, let's take a look at what is happening in finance.
	And you know, when we look at, I like this title that was on Zero Hedge's headline, As Political Parties Fall, Gold and Silver Will Rise.
	Why is he saying that? He's talking about the collapse of the Western financial system.
	And you know, we have, at this juncture, at this fourth turning, We have not just inflation, we've got a potential collapse of the financial and political systems as well.
	And of course, they want to engineer that to bring in CBDC, which is the other issue with that.
	When you look at Biden's executive orders about CBDC, what was it?
	To completely redesign the financial system.
	They want a great reset of the financial system.
	Destroy what is currently there.
	Bring in another one. So when you look at what has happened, they've laid the foundation for a complete collapse of the financial and political systems.
	They've laid a foundation for inflation.
	They've laid a foundation for CBDC. We're at a very dangerous juncture here.
	And so that's why, you know, when we talk about gold and silver, I think you need to think about what you're going to do to have a little bit of wealth protection in these very difficult times.
	It says it's a consequence of deficit spending, major debt expansion, currency debasement, and inflation that is leading to political and economic turmoil and misery.
	The deficit spending will accelerate.
	We said, take a look at what's going on in the UK. Again, you know, they're going to spend money like a drunken sailor.
	As Reagan said, that's an insult to drunken sailors.
	The new labor government, no limits to what they're going to do.
	In France, you've got hardcore leftists.
	What do you think they're going to do with spending?
	What do you think is going to happen in the United States, regardless of whether Trump or Biden wins?
	These are two guys that kicked up the deficit spending and kept it there.
	To adding another three to four trillion dollars a year.
	Both of these candidates, both Trump and Biden, exploded our deficit.
	So the U.S. debt, as he points out, is up by 59 times higher since the gold window was closed.
	Because there's nothing to keep them honest.
	When you're going to ignore the Constitution, when you're going to ignore honest money, that's what happens.
	And so he's got a graph showing that it went from $1.7 billion in 1971 to $100 trillion today, total debt.
	This is how U.S. successive governments buy votes.
	A simple measure of massive wealth destruction and transformation that the West will experience in the coming years is the ratio of the Dow Industrial Average to gold.
	Back in early 1980, this ratio reached one for one.
	Gold was 850, and the Dow Index was 850.
	The long-term trend line now targets a ratio of 0.5 for one.
	As the graph shows, this could be gold at $10,000, a Dow at $5,000, or it could be gold at $20,000 and Dow at $10,000.
	But it also could be that maybe gold doesn't go up.
	Maybe the stock market crashes.
	Maybe the AI bubble bursts.
	Brian Shalhavi has been saying this for quite some time, and it's my opinion as well that we're in a similar situation to what we saw with the dot-com situation, the dot-com bust.
	It was clear in the late 1990s, so clear that, as I pointed out many times, the CIA set up its own venture capital firm.
	DARPA psychologists had proposed the Internet, but once the switching circuitry got to be practical, they really started picking the people who were going to control the Internet.
	But, you know, it was clear that the Internet was going to be a big thing, a big part of our infrastructure, and yet it got ahead of itself.
	And you had the dot-com bust.
	And I think the same thing is true of AI. I don't see AI as being much of a benefit for us.
	It's going to be a benefit for governments in terms of surveillance, and it's going to be a benefit for the military in terms of killing people.
	Those are the killer apps, if you will.
	Mass murder and surveillance of AI.
	That's why I despise it.
	But it's also a big economic bubble.
	Almost all of the increase in the stock market has been about AI.
	And the question is, have they gotten ahead?
	Have expectations gotten ahead of reality enough that you might have another one of these tech bubbles?
	I think so.
	And so does Brian Shalhavi of Health Impact News.
	He's been saying it for a while.
	He says, while I've been reporting on the big tech crash that started accelerating in 2022 for over a year now, others in the financial sector are finally beginning to see where the current AI hype is leading in the US.
	They're using such words as apocalypse in terms of what's going to happen when this AI bubble, which almost all economists now admit is a real thing, bursts.
	Zero Hedge reported this week that Goldman's head of research has apparently seen the light when it comes to the AI bubble and is, quote, downright apocalyptic on what the current AI bubble will lead to.
	So think dot-com bubble on steroids.
	Think the biggest bubble in history.
	That's Goldman's head of research.
	He says this because he says not one transformative application has been found.
	Well, I would disagree with that.
	I'm going to talk about the killer drones and what's going on in Ukraine.
	I'm going to talk about surveillance and that kind of pattern matching.
	Those are the killer apps.
	Rallying markets, he said, like to shoot, or in this case, buy, and ask questions much later or never.
	Certainly not until it's far too late, everything has crashed, and the finger-pointing and the crying are all that's left.
	At which point, the only question on the market's mind is why did nobody ask these questions earlier?
	He said the latest example of this, of course, is 3D TV. No, sorry, fake meat.
	No, sorry, virtual reality.
	No, the metaverse.
	No, blockchain. No, chatbot bubble.
	Where a handful of supergiant firms are adding hundreds of billions in market cap every single day because some algorithmic glitch where the market believes their revenue growth is virtually unlimited.
	Because somehow or other, companies have trillions and trillions in capital spending power, which they will give to the five biggest companies in the world, making them even bigger in the process.
	That's what we've been seeing. But more importantly, it does not assert that there is virtually nothing to show in terms of actual tangible results on the trillion dollars that tech giants are set to spend on AI in the coming years.
	Worse, Goldman's head of equity research is downright apocalyptic on what the current AI bubble will lead to.
	The dot com on steroid.
	Even the stock of the company reaping the most benefits to date, NVIDIA, has sharply corrected.
	We ask industry and economy specialists whether this large spend will ever pay off in terms of AI benefits and returns, and we explore the implications for economies and companies and markets if it does, or if it doesn't.
	Among the many pundits, the most notable was the institute professor at MIT, who is very skeptical.
	He says only a quarter of AI exposed tasks will be cost effective to automate within the next 10 years.
	Implying that the AI will impact less than 5% of all tasks.
	And he doesn't take much comfort from history that shows technology is improving and becoming less costly over time.
	He argues that the AI model advances won't likely occur nearly as quickly or be as impressive as many believe.
	That's what could birth the bubble.
	When somebody looks at this and finally says, you know, We were promised a lot of things and we haven't seen any of this stuff happen.
	That's starting to happen right now.
	And so, it says in short, not only will the hundreds of dollars spent on CapEx end up being a huge waste of capital, but the trillions in market cap gained by the big seven will be the biggest bubble in history.
	That's the professor at MIT. Going back to Health Impact News.
	He says, Indeed, when the history books are written for the future about the collapse of the great American empire, chief among its causes will be our over-reliance on technology and the false Darwinian belief system that whatever humans can do, machines and technology can do better as they evolve.
	This reliance on technology started in the 1800s when America abandoned using natural plants, herbs, and things in creation for healing, and when traditional methods of healing, such as homeopathy, were banned in favor of lab-produced pharmaceutical poison.
	Starting with vaccines, the false belief that man's technology could eliminate human disease.
	Today, the field of biotech still earns trillions while Americans get sicker and sicker, creating a highly medicated society addicted to their products, which is now the number one cause of death in the U.S.
	Another great failure in American biotech technology is the destruction of the family farms in favor of mega food companies and the proliferation of genetically modified foods, along with the chemicals needed in pesticides, herbicides, to even grow crops in a highly industrialized monocropping system.
	This wonderful technology that allows multinational corporations to produce so much food in scale to keep prices low has led to an increase in cancer, autism, obesity, diabetes, etc.
	But hey, it allowed companies to scale and earn huge profits while keeping prices low.
	So, meanwhile, the non-Western countries of the world are finally teaming up together to form a new economic system that does not allow the warmongering U.S. to impose economic sanctions against them.
	Yeah, exactly right.
	So, it's...
	When we look at this, again, davidknight.gold, that'll take you to Tony Arterman, and you can get gold, silver, small or large amounts there.
	And he's got a great way for you to save on a monthly basis as well as to get quantity discounts as part of a buying group.
	It's called Wolfpack.
	So go to davidknight.gold.
	I'll take you to Wise Wolf Gold that Tony Ardeman has, and you need to do something in order to prepare for what is on its way.
	Well, we'll take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	show.
	Marky Mark, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, we're not quite halfway through the show yet.
	We have over 100 likes.
	Thank you, folks. Appreciate that.
	Thank you very much. And again, if you're not watching the show live, if you haven't liked it, you've still got a chance.
	But if you're not watching it live, please like the show wherever you're watching it.
	That always helps. He says, the powers that be won't let the grid go down.
	They'll lose their mind controlling the internet.
	They'll lose the narrative feedback mechanism JCR Licklider designed.
	No juice, no mind control or feedback.
	And that's what it's been from the very beginning.
	It's always about that.
	Well, let's take a look at what the killer app for artificial intelligence is.
	I just talked about how I'm skeptical of this AI stock bubble.
	The New York National Guard soldiers are training with pocket-sized drones that will eventually be given to the Army.
	And this is from Wine Press News.
	They are handing these things out.
	They're working at Fort Drum, New York.
	They're referred to as a soldier-borne sensor, an SBS. It allows for deployed soldiers to perform their own reconnaissance in the field.
	Assuming that there's no jamming.
	I mean, that's become a very big thing in Ukraine.
	And we're going to talk about how they get around the jamming of these drones.
	You know, you've got kind of off-the-shelf drones being brought to use in terms of the military.
	It reminds me very much of the early days in World War I, where they had the very first flying machines, these biplanes.
	And they used them primarily for reconnaissance.
	And after a while, they put some little small bombs and they'd drop the bombs.
	They would shoot each other, you know, had the dogfights that were there.
	But it was in it was early days.
	They didn't really have much in terms of guns that came into play in terms of the trench warfare that had worked itself out into a kind of a stalemate.
	But they could still use these things for reconnaissance and they could still drop a few small bombs.
	That's kind of where we are with this drone stuff right now.
	They're using it for reconnaissance.
	They're using it for small bombs.
	And they're using it...
	And I've seen...
	I haven't played it on here because it's really just a horrifying video.
	And you can find these on the internet pretty frequently.
	It was a drone that was coming after a soldier who was wounded on the ground.
	So he can't get up and run.
	And... There was a second drone that was watching and filming this whole thing.
	So he got one watcher and filmer and another killer drone.
	And the guy's on the ground, and he sees this thing coming at him, and you see him put his hands up like, please no, please no.
	And they just come right at him and blows up and kills him.
	You know, we were told a few years ago, only about four years ago, about the Slaughterbots.
	Remember that film that was done?
	Tell us straight down. We'll play a little bit of that coming up here for you.
	But I remember probably about a decade ago, I was talking to Noel Sharkey, who at the time was pushing this campaign to try to stop killer robots.
	It's not going to happen.
	Because there's this arm race.
	I've also had a guy who wrote a book about it, and he called it The Four Battlegrounds.
	The purpose of his book, he's with the military-industrial complex, and I had him on even though he's with the military-industrial complex, because I want to talk about artificial intelligence with military weapons.
	His book, if you look at it, The Four Battlegrounds, the four battlegrounds that they see developing with China.
	And so they were very focused on China, China, China.
	But he had some interesting asides there about technology, about robotics, about AI controlling planes and doing other things like that.
	And that's really what I had him on to talk about.
	But this particular thing is, again, reconnaissance.
	They call it a black hornet. It's designed to mitigate the risk to soldiers by having the miniature drone complete dangerous work soldiers would typically perform on their own.
	It's got a small size, measures only a few inches, has very low noise.
	It's being created by a Norwegian company, only 33 grams, nearly silent.
	It has a flight time of 25 minutes.
	And it transmits live video and HD still images back to the operator.
	Now, again, always the question is jamming.
	And that's what the Russians have done.
	They've had so many drone attacks on tanks.
	And you see them driving around. It looks like they put a homemade chicken coop on top of their tank and stuff.
	The netting and things like that that are up there.
	We call them turtles in some cases.
	But they have started heavy jamming and kind of creating...
	An interference dome as they move their tanks ahead.
	That's what they mean by contested environment.
	The Black Hornet drones are currently being used by Ukrainian forces.
	Norway's Ministry of Defense ordered 1,000 more of these things.
	It's big business. And you have to understand, this is one of the key things about this war, why it's going on.
	Certainly, there's a lot of money laundering that is happening.
	And Julian Assange pointed that out about Afghanistan.
	Same thing is going on with Ukraine.
	Well, everybody says the most corrupt government on earth.
	So, you know, there's a lot of money laundering.
	There's been a lot of money laundering exposed with the Biden family.
	And so that's one aspect of the war.
	But another part of the war is that it allows them to use it as a real live fire test case for their weapons.
	And so a lot of these wars, like the one in Ukraine, are being fueled by the desire of the military-industrial complex to have a test field.
	So they said they can fly these things at a high elevation.
	You can't see it.
	You can't hear it because it's so quiet.
	Winepress says, well, being a pessimist that I am, I saw this and thought, great, another tool for the military to spy and to use against its own people.
	That's exactly right. New York Times did a very lengthy article about how this drone technology and killer robots is really escalating in Ukraine it's been picked up by a lot of different sources because it's a very thorough article and a very concerning article Ukraine currently testing autonomous drones killer robots that type of thing Ukrainian drone company
	Recently at work on a weapon of the future as they've talked about it. They had an example for the person who Was doing this report They have the CEO get on a motorcycle and starts driving down a road trying to evade this drone that he doesn't see, doesn't hear.
	Certainly can't hear it over the sound of the motorcycle.
	And you've got another guy who's controlling it to show that there's nothing that he can do to get away from it.
	And they said, well, if this had some explosives on it, he'd be dead, just like that soldier that I talked about earlier.
	So these companies are rapidly escalating, and it's really become a very entrepreneurial enterprise in Ukraine.
	Got a lot of young guys in their early to mid 20s Who have been playing around a lot with drones with video games and other things like that just taking off-the-shelf technology and You know putting it together and selling massive amounts of it to the Ukrainian government which has apparently unlimited resources to buy this stuff based on What Congress and Mike Johnson and the Democrats have done and many of the Republicans and tort in order to give them?
	access to all this.
	Many of these weapons were built with code that was found online, with components that you would have in hobbyist computers.
	Things like the Raspberry Pi system.
	You can buy that from Best Buy.
	You can get it from a hardware store.
	This is off-the-shelf consumer equipment that they're putting together for these improvised explosive devices, right?
	It's no longer roadside bombs like you saw throughout the Middle Eastern wars.
	It's now these improvised explosives have now taken to the skies.
	The systems raise stakes in the international debate about the ethical and legal ramifications of AI on the battlefield.
	And then, of course, as they move to an automated system, what is putting pressure on them to use autonomous killer robots is the very thing I was talking about in terms of jamming.
	If they're going to have a targeted explosive drone that's going to be flown by an operator, if the Russians can jam that, then it doesn't work.
	So their solution to that is to create these, you know, add another layer to this that, again, is kind of off-the-shelf stuff, but some kind of autonomous capability provided by some limited AI to identify a human and kill them.
	And that's the real issue with all this stuff.
	Where does that stop? How do you regain control of that?
	How do you know that it's going to kill the right person?
	It can identify a person and kill them.
	But with the kind of crude stuff that they have at this moment in Ukraine, with off-the-shelf components, how do they know that doing anything other than killing a person?
	On Rockfan, Amos Poole, thank you very much.
	That's very generous. Thank you.
	And he thanks me. Well, thank you, Amos.
	I appreciate that. So, major questions are looming about what level of automation is acceptable.
	And I can't remember the guy's name.
	I remember the book was The Four Battlegrounds.
	But again, he's, you know, been involved with these organizations like Project for a New American Century and all these military-industrial complex things.
	But even he was saying, yeah, it's very concerning.
	When we look at this, when we turn over fire control to the robots, how do you get it back?
	And he said the same thing that is causing the arms race.
	Well, we've got to keep up with it. We don't want to have a killer drone gap.
	So we know that they're going to do it.
	We know that we're looking at this and wanting to do it.
	So it's going to be an arms race.
	We have to have autonomous killer robots.
	We have to have autonomous killer drones.
	We have to have autonomous killer drone swarms.
	And on and on. And then once you realize that's going to happen, you've got to, at some point, you realize that if you keep human control over when it's going to fire, when it's going to kill, you're going to be at a disadvantage to the people who just turn that over to the computer because it's going to be faster.
	So he goes, that part of it is also an arms race, also inevitable that it's going to escalate into that.
	So to try to keep a human in the loop, that's going to be pushed out as well.
	But this very lengthy New York Times article talks about, here's an example, I said, of young people in their mid-20s, early 20s, some of them.
	In a ramshackle workshop in an apartment building in eastern Ukraine, a 28-year-old soldier helped to push innovations that turned cheap drones into weapons.
	First, he strapped bombs to racing drones.
	Then he added larger batteries to help them fly farther.
	Then recently incorporated night vision so the machines can hunt in the dark.
	And by the way, if you haven't seen these racing drones, they truly are amazing.
	Look up some of these things on YouTube.
	These people are flying these things very fast through all kinds of obstacles.
	Sometimes they'll follow race cars around a track, and it makes it look really strange.
	It almost looks like you're watching somebody playing a video game, but they're actual cars that it's got an aerial view of.
	So they're very capable, very agile, very fast.
	And he gave it additional range, gave it some weapons.
	The machines have been especially helpful against jamming that can break communication links between drone and pilot.
	With the drone flying itself, however, a pilot can simply lock onto a target and let the device do the rest.
	One Ukrainian soldier, one Ukrainian drone maker, built an autonomous targeting system with AI processes originally designed for sorting and classifying fruit.
	During the winter, the company began sending its technology to the front lines, testing different systems with drone pilots.
	And demand soared.
	So again, it can recognize fruit, it can recognize humans, and kill them.
	But you've got a lot of Ukrainian soldiers saying, wait a minute...
	Is this going to be friendly fire as well?
	How do you distinguish between the different troops?
	Or do you even care?
	He now makes 1,000 of these circuit boards a month.
	He plans to expand to 9,000 a month by the end of the summer.
	You see what we've created? We've opened up Pandora's box.
	And the Congress just keeps pouring more and more money into this Pandora box.
	In one clip he shared on social media, a drone flies over a field scarred by shelling.
	A box at the center of the pilot's viewfinder suddenly zooms in on a tank, indicating a lock.
	The drone attacks on its own, exploding into the side of the armor.
	He's gone even further in recent weeks, successfully using a reconnaissance drone that identified targets with AI, then dispatched autonomous kamikaze drones for the kill.
	In one case, the system struck a target 25 miles away.
	And he said, once we reach the point where we don't have enough people, the only solution is to substitute them with robots.
	Because the war must go on.
	Does this sound like something out of the twilight zone?
	We ran out of soldiers a long time ago, so now we're still fighting, but we're doing it with robots and drones and things like that.
	Because, you know, politicians are going to have their wars whether they've got people to fight them or not, I guess.
	A 23-year-old reservist trained four soldiers on how to use a futuristic weapon, a gun turret with an autonomous targeting that works with a PlayStation controller and a tablet.
	They explain how the gun, he calls it Wall-E, after the Pixar robot Wall-E, so it kind of looks like that.
	It can auto-lock on a target that's up to 1,000 meters away, and it can jump between pre-programmed positions to quickly cover a broad area.
	He said, when I first saw this gun, I was fascinated, and I understood this was the only way, if not to win this war, than to at least hold our positions.
	Then we move from these 20-something-year-old kids who are putting this stuff together using off-the-shelf components to Eric Schmidt.
	The guy who, and again, this is the individual that I talked to about that, everybody understands that Eric Schmidt has made himself one of the key players now in the military-industrial complex, this former CEO of Google.
	Other investors like him set up a firm called D3 to invest in emerging battlefield technologies in Ukraine.
	It's all about the profit, isn't it?
	I keep thinking of the Chicago.
	We used to do a lot of Chicago and the covers in the band that I was in when I was in college.
	And, you know, one of the songs, While the City Sleeps, Men Are Scheming, New Ways to Kill Us and to Tell Us Dirty Lies.
	Boy, if that doesn't describe Google to a T. Eric Schmidt designing new ways to kill us after he told us dirty lies all this time with Google.
	A search engine designed now to hide things, not to help you find them.
	One of these groups, a battalion known for its innovation and weaponry, was called the Da Vinci Wolves.
	I guess because, like Leonardo...
	They may improvise and invent things.
	They recall the need to defend what they call the road of life, a route that was used to supply troops fighting the Russians along the eastern front line in Bakhmut.
	They said it spurred invention.
	They said, imagining a solution, he posted an open request on Facebook for a computerized, remote-controlled machine gun.
	In several months, he had a working prototype from a firm called Roboneers.
	The gun was almost instantly helpful for his unit.
	He said we could sit in the trenches, drinking coffee, smoking cigarettes, and still shoot at the Russians.
	His input later helped the Roboneers to develop a new sort of weapon.
	They mounted the machine gun turret atop a rolling ground drone to help troops make assaults or to quickly change positions.
	This led to a bigger need for AI-powered auto-aim, said the chief executive of Roboneers.
	So, another local company is called Swarmer.
	And again, this is about drone swarms.
	As my son has said, nothing good ever comes in a swarm.
	That's especially true when you're talking about the drones.
	And it's especially true, you go back to the novel, Daniel, the reason we're talking about that, the novel that Daniel Suarez did called Kill Decision, I think, was it?
	Was that it? Look it up and see.
	Yeah, Travis is nodding his head.
	Yes, he's heard it too. And it was all about swarming killer drones.
	And essentially how it made the entire military industrial complex obsolete.
	And they were fine with that because, hey, we can get to tool up for something completely new.
	In the same way that the oil companies are completely fine with...
	There it is, right there. Kill Decision.
	Yeah, Daniel Suarez. Very interesting book.
	Highly recommend that if you haven't read it.
	I don't understand why they haven't made it into a movie yet, because it really is perfect for the kind of predictive programming that they like to do.
	It's just that the military-industrial complex doesn't come off that well in it.
	It comes off very realistic.
	Also, I'm sure the main character isn't a black female lesbian or something.
	Well, they could always change that, you know.
	So, Swarmer is the name of the company.
	And they built a model that was trained on large amounts of data on frontline drone missions.
	It enables a single technician to operate up to seven drones on bombing and reconnaissance missions.
	They added abilities to guide kamikaze attack drones up to 35 miles.
	So, Instead of just one drone now, they can control a cluster of drones.
	And of course, it's just an extension of technology to go from seven to who knows how many.
	Back in 2017, Mr.
	Russell, a Berkeley AI researcher, released an online film, Slaughterbots.
	Do you remember that? I'm going to show you just a little bit of it here.
	Customer pilots directed almost 3,000 precision strikes last year.
	We're super proud of it.
	It allows you to separate the bad guys from the good.
	It's a big deal.
	But we have something much bigger.
	It's circling him.
	Your kids probably have one of these, right? Not quite.
	Hell of a pilot?
	No. That skill is all AI. It's flying itself.
	Its processor can react a hundred times faster than a human.
	The stochastic motion is an anti-sniper feature.
	Just like any mobile device these days, it has cameras and sensors, and just like your phones and social media apps, it does facial recognition.
	Inside here, Is three grams of shaped explosive.
	This is how it works.
	He throws it out in the audience.
	Comes back and attacks the dummy on the other side.
	That little bang is enough to penetrate the skull and destroy the contents.
	They used to say guns don't kill people.
	People do. Well, people don't.
	They get emotional, disobey orders, aim high.
	Let's watch the weapons make the decisions.
	Now, trust me, these were all bad guys.
	Trust me. Assassinating people in a parking garage.
	That is an airstrike of surgical precision.
	It's one of a range of products.
	Trained as a team, they can penetrate buildings, cars, trains, evade people, bullets, pretty much any countermeasure.
	They cannot be stopped.
	Now, I said this was big.
	Why? Because we are thinking big.
	Watch. 25 million dollar order now buys this.
	Enough to kill half a city.
	The bad half.
	Nuclear is obsolete.
	Take out your entire enemy, virtually risk-free.
	Just characterize him Release the swarm and rest easy.
	If we don't do anything about it, autonomous weapons and AI could become a radically new and dangerous form of killing people.
	Because you no longer need a nation of people and a bunch of followers to raise an army.
	If you can just manufacture an army, and this gets into kind of the Star Wars Clone Wars, you just clone an army or build a robot army.
	That could kind of fundamentally change, you know, the course of history.
	Yeah, well, that was about, that first clip that was there was about four or five years ago.
	Mr. Russell, a Berkeley artificial intelligence researcher, slaughter at bots.
	It's 2017.
	Okay, so seven years ago.
	Seven years ago. But now he's commenting on what is happening in Ukraine, because this is now rapidly becoming reality.
	He said it moves us towards that dystopian future.
	He's already haunted, he said, by Ukrainian videos of soldiers who are being pursued by weaponized drones piloted by humans.
	There's often a point where the soldiers stop trying to escape or they hide because they realize they can't get away from the drone, like the one that I described earlier.
	He said there's nowhere for them to go, so they just wait to die.
	And he said he's not alone, of course, in this.
	And Vienna, members of a panel of UN experts have also said they're worried about ramifications of what is being developed in Ukraine.
	Officials have spent more than a decade debating rules about the use of autonomous weapons, but few expect any international deal to set new regulations, especially as the U.S., China, Israel, Russia, and others race to develop these weapons.
	Of course, there's not going to be. How would they possibly enforce that against the U.S., Russia, China, Israel?
	They don't have the means to do that.
	So they can talk all they want, and we can talk about the problems, but it's like everything else.
	The government is not going to do anything about the problem, because the government is the problem.
	Yeah, remember, it's not just the virus that's going to find you.
	The government is. Geopolitics makes this impossible, said Austria's top negotiator on the autonomous weapons at the UN. These weapons will be used, and they'll be used by the military arsenal of pretty much everybody.
	And so the article from the New York Times ends with one guy who is a minister of digital transformation in Ukraine.
	He said, this is all academic.
	We're outgunned, we're outmanned, and we need to win.
	And in order to do that, we'll do everything that we can to introduce automation to its maximum to save the lives of our soldiers.
	Well, of course, there's something else you could do.
	You could have peace talks. You could have negotiations.
	You could have a long time ago decided that you weren't going to go to war if some people in your country wanted to be associated with Russia rather than Ukraine after the U.S. coup.
	And that's not a theory.
	Every time somebody decides they want to have autonomous self-government or every time some group wants to secede from a government, it should not be inevitable that you have to have a war.
	It usually is, because the personality of the power-hungry people who run our world But we've had situations throughout Scandinavia.
	You've had the various countries that are there.
	Norway, Finland, Sweden, even Denmark.
	They have been independent.
	They have joined together in groups and then split apart.
	They've done it in various combinations.
	And they've done it many, many times without having a war.
	And so you don't have to have a war when something like that happens.
	But, again, the...
	Commentary from Wine Press, or one of the places that's covered this New York Times article, said, as soon as I started reading this, I thought about slaughterbots.
	And of course, I actually referred to this.
	And he said, and if you understand how the propaganda machine works, it's basically the media telegraphing to us eventually what we will be forced to reconcile and deal with.
	It's predictive programming and that's what These people are all about They're not going to stop me. That's just like they're not going to stop the war. They're not going to stop the killer robots When technocracy covered this same story from the New York Times his comment was he said one of the most corrupt nations on earth The pressure to out think the enemy along with huge flows of investment Donations government contracts has turned Ukraine into a
	Silicon Valley for autonomous drones and other weaponry That's actually a quote from the New York Times article.
	He said, electronic jamming will be a thing of the past because the drones will use preloaded AI to seek and destroy their targets.
	See, that's the other perverse thing about this.
	As they began the use of drones, remote control, kill bots, and things like that.
	The jamming is another impetus for them to go with automatic targeting.
	Because then you don't have to worry about the jamming.
	In the EU, Commissioner calls for digital ID, e-health records, and increased anti-disinformation efforts.
	And what they call their digital decade report.
	We are now, I don't know if the digital decade, if we're in the middle of it, or if, you know, that's their goal, but they always point to 2030.
	So I don't know if the digital decade begins in 2030 or the digital decade is now as we're preparing for 2030.
	Even though the EU claims are falling behind in their set of initiatives, the authors of the report still say that 2023 and 2024 have been watershed years for the EU's leadership in the digital age.
	What do they mean by that? Well, it's actually the Orwellian technologies that we see all the time.
	They said 46% in this report, 46% of European citizens think that misuse of personal data is one of the online issues that have major personal impact on them.
	45% think the same thing about fake news and disinformation, while non-justified removal of content and non-transparent content moderation, censorship.
	Those are the two least mentioned issues.
	So they're more concerned because they're listening to the tyrants who are running this thing.
	They're more concerned about fake news than they are about real censorship.
	They've been trained to think this way.
	You can say, is it a...
	You know, is this propaganda?
	Yeah, it is. That's all they talk about, is how they must stop that.
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, dear Klaus, your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, The top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate.
	It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our society.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You are listening to The David Knight Show.
	Because that's what they run on.
	That's mother's milk to election.
	And I think it's very interesting what is happening in North Carolina.
	Because I worked with a third party trying to get on the ballot in North Carolina.
	I know they had some of the most stringent and ridiculous rules in terms of getting on the ballot of any state.
	And they're at it again.
	And it's the Democrats in North Carolina who have a majority on the Board of Elections, the State Board of Elections.
	Three Democrats, two Republicans.
	And they're using their majority to keep Democrats off the ballot.
	Cornel West, RFK Jr., and they're Democrats.
	They're running as independents.
	They're trying to get on as independents.
	Because when you look at what has happened to our election...
	The political parties have become so centralized, so corrupt, so controlling that you can't have a primary.
	And so the Democrats have shut down primaries, they shut down other candidates, they shut down debates and all the rest of the stuff just as Trump has.
	And now when these people try to go outside of the party...
	Well, it's the same Democrats or Republicans who are running the ballot access.
	That's why I said in 2020, all these people were complaining about it.
	I said, how naive can you be?
	It was Trump who added the vote-by-mail stuff.
	But apart from a vote-by-mail, the electronic voting machines, it's always been an issue.
	Always been an issue of corruption.
	And the big issue of corruption begins with ballot access.
	That's the biggest one.
	And of course, nobody wants to have free and open elections.
	They don't want to do anything about that.
	Election integrity advocates are targeting North Carolina Democrats who are trying to block ballot access for third-party candidates.
	These are third-party Democrats, essentially.
	But it's a fair election fund.
	That's what they call it.
	And they have launched a media blitz $175,000 they're spending on ads, and here's what the ad is.
	Democrats know Joe Biden's not up for another four years.
	But rather than tell the truth, they're tipping the scales in his favor.
	Three liberals on the North Carolina State Board of Elections are leading the charge, trying to control who's on the ballot.
	They sheltered Biden from primary competition.
	And these two tried to stop no labels.
	Another one even supported the case to stop Trump's candidacy.
	Their next targets?
	RFK Jr. and Cornel West.
	And a major decision from the State Board of Elections that will keep RFK and Cornel West off the November presidential ballot.
	And the highest-ranking Democrats are behind it.
	The vote comes after weeks of pressure from Democrats and a group tying to President Biden trying to keep independent challengers off the ballot.
	By blocking competition, they're blocking your voting rights.
	If you know anything about the North Carolina State Board of Elections' shady backroom deal, call us.
	You could receive compensation.
	I wonder if they'll pay me. I could tell the decades of experience that I've had with them.
	Write that phone number down.
	I have to give them a call. Three Democrats voted not to certify Cornel West, who, surprisingly, is right up there, if not slightly ahead, of RFK Jr.
	in many of these polls.
	A few weeks earlier, under immense pressure from National Democrats and Biden's allies in Washington, These three Democrats overruled the two Republicans on the board, made their ruling despite both Kennedy and West amassing enough petition signatures to qualify for the ballot.
	So first they make you go out and get signatures, which the Republicans and Democrats never have to do.
	And then they will come back and if you win and they really don't want you on They will challenge those Signatures and they will use any kind of game to do it and this has been going on for a very long time And it goes on by both Republicans as well as Democrats. It just depends on Who is in charge and who feels most threatened by this?
	The Democrats know that Biden is not up for another four years as you heard it say But again to summarize this two of these people delayed certification of even no labels as a party in North Carolina that that was more accurately Described as not as no labels, but no candidates They couldn't get anybody to run on that.
	It was like, yeah, let's put together a third party thing here and we'll call it no labels.
	It's kind of, they sit around like, who wants to do this?
	I don't want to do it. You don't want to do it?
	Kind of like the discussions we used to have with the Libertarian Party.
	All right, let's get on the ballot. Okay, who's going to run for office?
	I don't want to do that. I did it last time.
	You guys do it this time.
	That type of deal. I guess that was what was happening with no labels.
	They could never get any candidates.
	No candidates. But all three of these Democrats on the Board of Elections voted to make sure that Biden didn't have any challengers in his primary in North Carolina.
	I also did the same thing.
	The DNC did that in Florida.
	One of them voted to advance the challenge, even seeking to remove Trump from the ballot in North Carolina.
	And... Then what they're doing now in terms of focusing on the signatures that are there.
	Sometimes they'll say, well, I couldn't read that signature.
	So you always, if you go around and you have to get these signatures, you have to get way more than the level that's there, knowing that they're going to throw out many of these because they say, well, I can't read the handwriting.
	And so CNN is reporting that the North Carolina Elections Board finds that some voters didn't know the purpose of Those who signed petitions to help the independent presidential hopefuls did not understand the purpose of those petitions.
	You see, this is another way that they rig the system.
	It's rigged in so many different ways.
	They make you put together a...
	They tell you the wording that has to be on the petition.
	They dictate that. And when we were doing it, the wording would say that I agree that I want to help to form a new third party of such and such a name.
	And that I want to join that party.
	And so if they wanted to get the signature petitions off, they'd just go around and find a few people and say, did you know that you signed a petition to join a party?
	No, I just wanted to see choices on the ballot.
	Oh, well, no, but the petition says that you wanted to actually join and help to form that party.
	So that was given to you then, I guess, under false pretenses?
	That's the game they're playing here.
	And they've always played that game.
	They were playing that game back in the early 90s when I was involved in this stuff.
	And so they've changed the wording a little bit today.
	They said this violated a state law that requires newly formed political parties to inform signers of, quote, the general purpose and intent, unquote, of the party.
	These people just wanted to see RFK Jr.
	and Cornell Weston.
	When I take the signature petitions and stuff, it's like, oh yeah, let's have an open ballot.
	A lot of people just sign it.
	They don't care. They don't necessarily intend to vote for that person.
	They certainly don't intend to be part of a party that's being formed or something like that, but they would just like to have an open ballot.
	That's why they put this language on there.
	These people... We're such snakes.
	These politicians. It's such a disgusting thing.
	I know I get really negative about this.
	I really do hate politics.
	I hate the people who do this stuff.
	I've hated politics since we had the kind of popularity contest that you have for student government.
	It's like, why do we need to have a student body president?
	What do they do? It's just a popularity contest.
	They can put on their resume, I guess.
	I don't know what it is. But it gets even worse as time goes on.
	And these people are so devious.
	And what they do.
	And so even when they set up these hoops, and even when you jump through those hoops, they still have a way to claw it back.
	On Rumble, Laura Marie says, the U.S. Navy recently demonstrated its low-cost UAV swarming technology LOCUS. It reminds me of Revelation 9.
	Yeah, that's how you call it that.
	Yeah, exactly. It's got this metallic armor on it and all the rest of this stuff.
	Maybe they'll make it look like it.
	Who knows? On Rumble, Jeb Stewart.
	I would like to see David Knight and Mark Dice argue over the carcass of Alex Jones.
	Well, that's not going to happen.
	He's not finished.
	He's going to keep going. He'll keep going one way or the other.
	Rumble. Don't frag me, bro.
	LOL, Mark Dice. I think he's a government shill and the silence about Trump is deafening.
	He's a variant of Crowder or vice versa.
	Yeah, I haven't followed Mark Dice.
	I just...
	It's kind of...
	It is just very much like Stephen Crowder.
	You know, these are guys that are out there just to mix things up, stir things up.
	And, of course, that helps them get past the censors.
	You know, they're just...
	Paul Watson is in the same category.
	He doesn't care about...
	You know, reporting on Julian Assange or anything that's going to poke the bear.
	If he can get different groups angry at each other, look at this, isn't this ridiculous?
	You know, you get different people fighting.
	They love that. They'll leave you alone.
	They'll let you get a big audience on their platforms and all the rest of this stuff.
	But getting back to this, at the same time, they're so particular about these people signing petitions.
	Did you really know what you were doing?
	And at the same time that they open up the border, the Biden administration is now slamming a bill that would require citizens to show ID in order to vote.
	And this has always been there.
	We've always had them lying to us.
	Oh, that's not happening. I know personally, like I've said many times, Karen's brother, Keith, had a friend who went to and was in 2012.
	He went to vote, and North Carolina has the longest voting period of any state, and they had no ID. I don't know if they have it now or not, but they had no ID requirements.
	So he goes to vote on Election Day, and all he had to do was give him a name and an address.
	So he could go in and vote the phone book.
	You know, every day you go to a different jurisdiction and you give them a name and an address.
	Oh, okay, they mark it down that you vote.
	And so Keith's friend goes in to vote and they said, no, you've already voted.
	And so is this other person at your address?
	And so that's my mother.
	She's been dead for several years.
	Oh, but it's not a problem.
	You don't have to show any ID, right?
	The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act.
	Save. Introduced by Chip Roy out of Texas.
	Could come up for a House vote this week.
	The Biden administration argued that the bill is redundant because they said it's already illegal for non-citizens to vote.
	Come on! Well, how did these non-citizens, how are they living here in this country?
	Illegally. If they came here illegally, you don't think they might want to vote illegally?
	Do we think that maybe that's not why they're being brought in here, one of the many reasons that they want to bring them in?
	So, when you look at how they have rigged the process, first of all, to make sure there's not going to be any primaries, not going to be any debates, not going to be any third parties, any kind of challenges like that, or independents, we now have some inkling of what the people who don't like Biden want to do.
	We're just going to make this stuff up as we go along.
	We don't care what the Constitution says.
	We don't care what...
	Even the party rules say.
	Or what the board of election rules say.
	We're just going to make this stuff up as we go along.
	You know, it wasn't that long ago that they were saying, because the Democrats picked such a late convention date, that it was past the time that the political parties have to turn in their official nominee in Ohio.
	So in Ohio, they said, well, wait a minute, you know, our deadline is such and such, and you're not going to have your convention finish for like another week or two after that.
	And so they just waived that.
	You know, they waive the requirement for them.
	We don't care what the rules are.
	Now you've got a lot of donors as well as People in the Democrat Party who don't like Biden are now pushing for this thing they're calling the Blitz primary.
	I mentioned this the other day.
	So skip the ordinary primaries.
	Skip the debates and all the rest of this stuff.
	And now, because we don't like the guy that we've got here, let's just throw the whole process out and let's just reimagine this.
	And so you've got people like James Carville talking about how it would operate.
	But according to Semaphore, the plan would be something like this.
	You'd have Biden stepping down in mid-July, announcing a new system with support from Lala Harris.
	Potential candidates would have a few days to throw their hat in the ring.
	The Democrat Party would begin a primary sprint.
	We have to do this at warp speed.
	It's got to be done very quickly, right?
	And I tell you, you know, every time you see somebody doing something like this, you know, limited time only.
	You've got to make this decision within the next five hours.
	And if you don't, we don't give you the discount.
	That's always a hustle.
	Always a hustle. We were born yesterday.
	A Democrat party beginning a primary sprint in which the six candidates with the most votes from delegates pledge to run positive only campaigns in the month leading up to the convention.
	Weekly forums with each candidate moderated by cultural icons such as Michelle Obama or Oprah or Taylor Swift in order to engage voters.
	The nominee being chosen by delegates before the start of the Chicago convention on August 19th and being announced with plenty of fanfare on the third day of the gathering.
	The nominee then being unveiled on stage with Biden, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton and Biden being celebrated as a modern day George Washington.
	Oh, modern day George Washington.
	Well, I don't know.
	I mean, you know, when you look at George Washington...
	They're doing what? In the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense common again.
	This is the David Knight Show.
	We have to hear from George here.
	They're doing what? They're throwing out all the rules and laws and just going to do this real quick?
	Within a month or so, we're going to roll this thing out?
	I mean, this is July the 10th.
	So we're talking about all this stuff is going to happen in just a month.
	You know this isn't going to happen.
	I'm still standing by what I said the other day.
	This is a wag the Biden thing.
	This is a, you know, it's not going to happen.
	I think they're going to keep Biden in.
	But let's talk a little bit about what they're saying.
	This was this memo that was given to Semaphore.
	I wonder who intentionally leaked that to them.
	Anyway, they said in the memo, well, we can limp to shameful, avoidable, democracy-ending defeat, or Democrats can make this our finest hour.
	While we hope for help from the Lord Almighty, the Lord helps those who help themselves.
	Yeah, where exactly is that in the Bible?
	It's nowhere in the Bible.
	And who are these Democrats?
	Why are they appealing to God?
	They've never done that before.
	This truly is strange.
	Now, James Carville...
	Wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times.
	So they leak this memo out.
	James Carvel is putting...
	Carvel. He's selling ice cream here.
	James Carvel is writing op-ed pieces on New York Times.
	He says, Biden won't win.
	Democrats need a plan.
	Here's my plan. And what he wants to do is he wants to let Obama and Clinton run this warp speed primary.
	And what could possibly go wrong with that?
	James Carville says, I want to see the Democrat Party hold four historic town halls between now and the Democrat National Convention in August.
	One each in the South, the Northeast, the Midwest, and the West.
	We can recruit the two most obvious, qualified people in the world to facilitate substantive discussion.
	The two most obvious and qualified people in the world, who would that be?
	Barack Obama and Bill Clinton?
	This is James Carville talking, of course.
	They may not represent every faction of our party under this big tent, but they care as much about our democracy as our nation's first president.
	And back to Washington again.
	They're doing what?
	They understand what it takes to be president.
	They know how to win. Yeah, that's what it takes to be president.
	You gotta win. Other than that, there's no job requirements.
	No documents you have to obey.
	Nothing about that. He said, town halls, high-stakes job interviews for the toughest job in the world will surely attract TV and cable partners.
	It'll generate record numbers of viewers.
	He said, think Super Bowl with Taylor Swift in the stands.
	This is what they want.
	They want one of these talent show things.
	They want The Apprentice.
	What are those things?
	Well, they have the singers come out.
	I don't watch any of this stuff.
	I've just seen some clips. That's what they want.
	Have some celebrity judges there.
	And then maybe they could have them sing.
	Who knows? We could turn it into the world's worst talent show.
	Yeah. America's Got Talent.
	America's Got Politicians.
	Because we don't have talent anymore.
	We've got DEI. America's Got Politicians.
	That's what he should call. I need to send him a message and say, here's what you call your little pageant, Carville.
	You call it America's Got Politicians.
	Think Super Bowl with Taylor Swift in the stands.
	The young, the old, everybody in between will tune in to see history being made in real time.
	It's a pageant.
	That's why I called it that from the very beginning.
	It said it's wag the Biden.
	So I would advise Presidents 42 and 44 to select eight leading contenders out of the pool of those who choose to run with Ms.
	Harris most definitely getting a well-earned invite.
	Yeah, well-earned.
	He said, maybe Presidents 42 and 44, that's Clinton and Obama.
	Can make the candidate selection even more democratic by consulting with a nation's 23 Democratic governors in the town hall selection process.
	Governors deal in the practical, not the theoretical.
	But I'm not a details guy.
	I say we leave it up to 42 and 44.
	Well, there you go.
	You gotta...
	See, Garvin may be off of his rocker, but he is at least entertaining, isn't he?
	And so at the same time this is happening, you've actually got, as he's putting this out on the New York Times, as they leak a memo to other publications about what they want to do, you've now got some of these billionaires, because we know they're the ones who actually make the selection, we've got billionaires who We're saying they're going to cut off Biden, they're going to cut off the Democrat Party, but they want to fund this, now they call it the mini-primary.
	So they've all got different names for this pageant, right?
	It could be the Blitz primary, the mini-primary, it could be America's Got Politicians, who knows?
	One of the deeply disenchanted donors is Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings, who gave more than $20 million to boost Democrat candidates in recent years.
	Well, that's nothing. I mean, you know, Sheldon Adelson's widow gave $100 million to Trump just this one, you know, just a couple weeks ago.
	Then there's Case Capital's management portfolio manager Whitney Tilson.
	All of us are standing by to see what happens here.
	Some mega donors are engaging in creative political financing engineering, such as Intuit and PayPal CEO Bill Harris, who donated $620,000 to Biden in 2020.
	So this PayPal CEO wants to pay his pals.
	Doesn't want to pay me. I mean, you know, kick me off of the platform, but this guy is going to, you know, pay big bucks to get whatever he wants out of these politicians and, you know, vice versa.
	On Friday, Harris, this former PayPal CEO, announced that his Democrats for the Next Generation PAC, he's already set up a political action committee, Was committed to spending $2 million to fund a series of debates among prominent candidates to become the Democratic nominee for president if Biden steps aside.
	Some are referring to this as a mini-primary.
	Some see it as a mechanism for ensuring that Lala Harris isn't tapped merely by virtue of her title.
	But he waved off Democrats' unease about a potentially messy and divisive process for picking a new candidate.
	He says, it's not what we have to protect ourselves from chaos and drama.
	He said, we need drama, and we need a little chaos.
	You see? That's what this is about.
	They need to have drama. They need to have chaos.
	The big problem with Biden is not the fact that he doesn't know where he is or what his name is.
	His big problem is he's boring.
	He's boring. You know, Trump is throwing bombshells all the time.
	So they've got to have some chaos.
	They've got to have some drama.
	Harris says we need it.
	We need drama. We need chaos.
	I think it is refreshing and energizing to have drama and chaos.
	Another billionaire, Mike Novogratz, and a Hollywood movie filmmaker, Andrew Jarecki, launching a nearly identically named Next Generation PAC.
	Multiple billionaires launching multiple PACs, multiple leaks to people about the primary Oh, they want the chaos and the drama.
	It is the Wag the Biden pageant, if ever there was one.
	Damon Lindelof, who created the Lost TV series, posted an opinion piece in Deadline, calling for a donor, Dembargo.
	Dembargo. Embargo the Democrats.
	Targeting not only Biden, but other candidates to bring them along, right?
	Many are angry with Hollywood tycoon and top Biden fundraiser, Jeffrey Katzenberg, who is seen as having perpetrated a sort of fraud.
	Katzenberg would say, Biden is fine.
	I was just with him.
	They said he had this famous quote for everybody, which was, I'm happy to put you in a room with him, and you can see for yourself.
	But he never put anybody in a room with him.
	You didn't want anybody to see for themselves.
	The entire Biden is sharp as a tax scam has the makings of a great Hollywood movie.
	That is, if Hollywood would allow some introspection.
	Yeah, they're going to take this guy, Biden, they're going to take old shoe.
	Like I said, they're going to create a lot of drama.
	They're going to create a lot of chaos.
	They're going to fall back to this boring guy who's foggy, doesn't know what's happening.
	And it's like, yeah, he's kind of hung through all this stuff.
	Good old shoe. They're going to wag the Biden, and that's exactly where this whole thing is going to end up.
	There's going to be a lot of drama by the people who write these types of scripts, many of them Hollywood people, and that's really all that's going to come out of it.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	♪♪
	the
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you Well, on Rumble, DG8 says, David, we could call it by your favorite presidential candidate.
	Yeah, yeah. Or instead of, who wants to marry a millionaire?
	We could say, who wants to marry a billionaire?
	Or which billionaire wants to marry one of these political candidates?
	On AP Rumble, seat says, bought, sold, and blackmailed.
	Yeah, absolutely. Well, let's take a look at what's coming up.
	Actually, next week, we have the Republican National Convention.
	Actually, I think they should call it the Trump National Convention.
	So the RNC, call it the TNC. He's bought it, right?
	He owns it. He put his daughter-in-law in charge of it.
	They've already written the platform.
	And so what's left?
	Well, we've got spectacle that's left.
	And I think that is a key part of what is going on right now in the Democrat Party.
	This is a competition for the limelight.
	And Trump's got his own reality TV series designs on all this.
	We have a model, Amber Rose.
	I had to look this up.
	I didn't know anything about it.
	It turns out she's Kanye West's ex-girlfriend.
	She's a model, a rapper babe.
	She was a judge on RuPaul's Drag Race competition thing.
	So maybe what they could do is at the Republican convention, maybe they could get Rudy Giuliani to dress up in drag again like he did with Donald Trump, and maybe she could judge how good a drag Rudy is.
	Yeah, so since she endorsed Donald Trump, and that's her only qualification.
	Is she a political activist?
	No. Does she know anything at all about politics?
	Does she care about the Constitution?
	Who knows? But she's going to be speaking.
	At the Trump National Convention.
	Because, hey, she's a model.
	She's a model. She's a rapper girl, right?
	The only thing that matters. She's officially endorsed Trump.
	You see, somebody like Bob Good, who's a congressman, a conservative congressman, somebody who was so conservative that he was head of the Freedom Caucus.
	No, his mistake was he didn't endorse Trump.
	He endorsed DeSantis, because DeSantis was, you know, actually had enacted conservative policies.
	And so for that disloyalty, Trump got this conservative pushed out.
	But because Amber Rose, a rapper booty girl, she endorsed him, so now she gets to speak at the convention.
	Because, again, it is all just a pageant, isn't it?
	Melania Trump hosted the Log Cabin Republicans for a fundraiser at the Trump Tower Penthouse.
	Just a year ago that she was playing the LGBT DEI card at Mar-a-Lago and they honored her with all kinds of honors and stuff and always at the center of all this is the as they describe him in LifeSite News Trump loyalists Rick Grinnell I think a better way to describe him is Trump's DEI pick Rick
	Grinnell Grinnell a homosexual has been one of the former president's closest supporters you know the thing about Rick Grinnell is he's he's not as loony as Sam Brinton or as Richard Devine or Levine or whatever The guy that is the deputy HHS secretary and dresses up as a woman.
	So he's not as crazy as him.
	Rick Grinnell looks normal.
	But again, he's somebody who is all about his sexuality as opposed to his sexuality.
	Qualifications for office.
	You know, he was picked and he talks about, oh yeah, yeah, I was picked because of my sexuality.
	And so in a sense, if his sexuality is his most important attribute, and it is, well he's not really any different, is he, than Amber Rose, the booty model.
	This election season has seen the Trump campaign make an even more blatant effort to court the pro-LGBT voters than in 2016 and 2020.
	And remember, back in 2020, Trump had all the rainbow merchandise, all the pro-Trump t-shirts and everything else with the rainbow stuff on it for LGBT people.
	We've seen the pictures of him with the LGBT rainbow flags and all the rest of the stuff.
	He plays the DEI game just like the Democrats do.
	Except that he does it in a more conservative manner.
	He doesn't get as radically crazy-looking people.
	In 2016, before assuming office, LifeSite says Trump told 60 Minutes that he was fine with homosexual marriage.
	He says, it's irrelevant because it was already settled.
	It's law.
	It was settled in the Supreme Court.
	I mean, it's done, he told Leslie Stahl at the time.
	Well, see, the reality is that it's not law because the Supreme Court says it.
	It's not settled because the Supreme Court has an opinion.
	And just like Roe v.
	Wade, and this is something that everybody said, you know, because both the Dobbs decision, which overturned that, but you look at what the Supreme Court has done in terms of saying, well, we're going to decide when life begins.
	And we're going to decide what marriage is.
	And many other things that the Supreme Court has jumped into that the federal government itself does not have any authority or jurisdiction on.
	I mean, they've usurped authority over marriage, over determining when life begins.
	They don't have that authority.
	Not at all. And so, it wasn't settled by the Supreme Court.
	It was usurped by the Supreme Court.
	And the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v.
	Wade... It also has implications for these other areas that the Supreme Court has imposed its opinion on the rest of us and all the governors have gone along with it.
	So it's not settled at all.
	But, you know, Trump, as everybody is so concerned about, and he's making promises, one of his 20 points was we're not going to have boys and girls sports.
	Well, Trump was trying to put boys in his women's beauty pageants before he ran for president.
	And when you look at he and Melania...
	And who they used to hang out with.
	You've seen... Actually, now let's take this picture here.
	Yeah, this one right here.
	Down there you see Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell.
	And you see Melania seems to be very familiar with Jeffrey Epstein.
	Of course, there's... A lot of people have said that Epstein introduced Melania to Trump.
	And they were very close friends until they got into a spat over one house that they both wanted down in West Palm Beach.
	But look at these other people here.
	This is something somebody put up.
	Why is he friends with five pedophiles?
	And the people I've got up there, George Nader, well, he was convicted of child pornography.
	This other guy, Tevfik Arif, he's a Turk who, back in Turkey, was arrested for running an army of trafficked women in prostitution.
	Then you've got Ray Cohen, who speaks for himself.
	John Casablancus, He was somebody who helped to set up the Trump Modeling Agency.
	And there have been several women who have come forward to say that they were groomed by pedophiles and attacked by pedophiles as part of what was happening with the Trump Modeling Agency and this John Casablancus that was running there.
	But then, when you look at it, this is not simply guilt by association.
	It's not simply the fact that he hangs out with Jeffrey Epstein and a lot of other sexual predators, human traffickers, pimps, and pedophiles.
	But he also had his picture taken with very young girls on the couch.
	Look at this.
	These girls are probably about 13 years old.
	And they're hanging all over Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.
	Absolutely disgusting.
	Mike Lindell, meanwhile, went on Steve Bannon's podcast, which is now being hosted by Jack Posobiec, while...
	While Bannon is in prison.
	And he had this to say about elections.
	He's got an idea about how he could fit in a Trump administration in order to fit elections.
	This is Mike Lindell. If he asks me to do anything, I'm hoping it's when we get this...
	When he gets in and he puts me in charge of the elections and where we can get our election platforms completely fixed.
	Ooh, I like that. I think the election bureau should be, which I have already set up, should be part of Homeland Security, Jack, so that we, because remember our government deemed our elections critical infrastructure.
	Yeah, okay.
	So Jack likes that idea.
	How do you like that idea?
	Do you think either one of these guys knows or cares what the Constitution says about any of this stuff?
	He's going to set up an election bureau.
	Where's that the Constitution?
	He wants to control elections centrally.
	Do you see a problem with that?
	I see a big problem with that.
	He said, yeah, I think we should have an election bureau.
	I think it should be under Homeland Security.
	Guess what, Lundell?
	I don't think there should be any Homeland Security.
	Remember when we got Homeland Security?
	Remember as part of the Patriot Act and all the rest of the stuff?
	After the false flag of 9-11?
	And now you want to put the election bureau under these people that were set up to spy and to attack us?
	You see, they don't want to have a constitutional America.
	They don't want to have a government that respects the Bill of Rights, that respects the Constitution.
	No, they just want to run it for themselves.
	They don't want to reform anything.
	They just want revenge, and they want the power of themselves.
	One of the worst ideas I've heard, and of course, Jack would say, oh, yeah, that's a great idea.
	Oh, I love that, yeah. Why?
	Well, because Homeland Security said that elections are critical infrastructure.
	You know what's critical infrastructure, Mike and Jack?
	Constitution. Constitution is critical infrastructure.
	If you're going to ignore the Constitution, do whatever you feel like, that's a big problem.
	And if you centralize this...
	The beauty is that the founders understood human nature.
	And they understood the dangers of centralization, which Mike Lindell and Jack Posobiec are clueless about, among many other things.
	The problem is that you want to have these elections decentralized.
	You want to decentralize everything as much as possible.
	And that especially means the elections.
	If you centralize control of the elections, what's going to happen, Mike, when you're out of there...
	And somebody else takes over.
	You know, one of these other Democrats take over.
	And they're going to run all the elections out of Washington?
	You see, our only hope, folks, is at the local level.
	I hammer this every day.
	Show you these idiots.
	There's not a choice out there for you to vote for.
	But we don't want to have everything centrally corrupted.
	And if you put this election bureau or something like that, or you exercise, I mean, it's not going to happen.
	That's just his fantasy. But it just shows how out of touch people like Bannon and Posobiec and Lindell, all these people are, how out of touch and how much they despise the Constitution.
	Because if you centrally control this, Then that's going to destroy the local elections.
	And the local elections are the only place where we've really got an important choice.
	The only place. And so, I saw this post yesterday.
	I liked it and retweeted it.
	I don't know who this person is.
	Georgia girl, 1967.
	My choices are three Democrats, she said.
	Choosing from any one of them just makes me a Democrat.
	I am not a Democrat.
	I am a conservative.
	Give me an actual conservative and I'll vote.
	If that's how these cults of personalities work, then okay.
	Somebody was saying, you're a cult of personality.
	Accusing, again, if you don't support Trump, you must be supporting one of these other Democrats.
	Because they're all Democrats.
	And then we had a woman in Tennessee who just won a court case.
	She put up on her lawn, front lawn, she put up a sign that said, F them both, and she spelled it out.
	That's her sign, her political sign.
	F them both. She put it out there on the yard, and she actually put a spotlight on it so people could see it.
	And people did not like the profanity, so they got the city of Lakeland, Tennessee to come after her for putting profanity on her, an obscene sign on her lawn.
	And they started fining her $50 a day.
	And then fines got up to just under $700.
	She hired an attorney and she won in court.
	And so now they've got to pay the attorney's fees of $31,000.
	She initially paid the fines and she covered up the letter U with tape.
	But then she took them to court and the attorney is going to get $31,000.
	And she evidently maybe gets back her 700.
	I don't know. In her lawsuit, she said she made the sign because she was disillusioned with having to choose between Trump and Biden again in November's election.
	But because she put the profanity there, the neighbors didn't like it.
	They came after her, but she started selling the signs the morning after the debate.
	She said...
	Her response was, she'd already started this lawsuit.
	But she said, listen, I think I'm on to something here, she put on Facebook.
	And she had a link to where you could purchase the signs for $20 on Amazon.
	She said, get your very own right here before they sell out.
	I think the politicians have already sold out.
	So she's going to run in court, and she is going to actually sell these things.
	Person after my own heart, although I wouldn't exactly use those same words.
	And so then you have J.D. Vance and these other people in the Veep Stakes.
	And Trump has said that he's going to announce who his vice presidential pick is before the convention.
	I don't know. Maybe he'll save it for the convention.
	Have more spectacle, more chaos, more all the rest of the stuff.
	But it's really kind of down to J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio and Doug Burgum in North Dakota.
	A billionaire who is very connected with the Green Movement and this massive CO2 pipeline, which also South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem was.
	She's out of the running. I haven't seen a lot of people talking about Doug Burgum.
	Doesn't necessarily mean that he's not one of the final three, but they focus more lately on the two senators, J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio.
	And so J.D. Vance is now saying that he supports access to the abortion pills, as I pointed out.
	LifeSite News took him to task for that.
	They said he is a professed Catholic, and now he's supporting abortion drugs being legal throughout the country.
	Well, see, I don't think that's something that the federal government should have any say about.
	Why didn't he just leave it at that?
	He says, Donald Trump has supported that opinion, and I support that opinion, he said.
	Okay. He said the Supreme Court's made a decision that the American people should have access to that medication.
	Trump supports that opinion.
	I support that opinion.
	Because, you know, he is pro-Trump, pro-Trump, pro-Trump.
	That was what was on Blake Master's sign.
	I like the F them both better than that.
	Vance appeared to not understand the Supreme Court's decision.
	The court did not rule that the American people should have access to that medication.
	It's not medication, first of all.
	But they didn't make a ruling at all.
	Instead, they ran away from it.
	Hot potato. They said, you don't have standing.
	And so they didn't say that it was okay.
	They just said that the people who were challenging it didn't have standing.
	And it's not medication.
	It's poison. Designed to kill a baby.
	And sometimes to kill a woman.
	Because what we're talking about here is not just an abortion pill, but we're talking about somebody having an over-counter access to an abortion pill that used to only be given after an examination.
	To make sure the baby wasn't at a size that it would harm the woman.
	Who cares about women's health?
	That's supposed to be all about women's health, isn't it?
	Well, not if you're going to have them take this abortion pill without even having an exam.
	You're not concerned about women's health at all.
	He said, Donald Trump is a pragmatic leader here.
	He's saying most abortion policy is going to be decided by the state's advance.
	We want to make it easier and more affordable for young women and parents to have families to begin with.
	Well, you know, you might want to get rid of that army of IRS agents that are marching towards us.
	No, they don't want to do that.
	They don't want to stop the IRS from getting seven times bigger.
	They don't make that a part of their of their platform. So they're not really interested in helping people afford to have a family They don't care about the deficit But they also don't care about the army that is marching towards us like a sword of Damocles hanging over our heads And they don't care about women's health either And since when do we need to be bribed to have a baby?
	What's the matter with this country? This this is the problem that you see even in some of these countries Like Poland or Hungary or whatever where they're they're concerned that nobody's having kids and so they Will give you money if you have kids and that type of thing Look, if you've got to be bribed to have a baby, maybe it's not for you.
	You know, maybe you need to have a different reason.
	Maybe you need to understand what a wonderful thing it is and how it's going to be a blessing to your life not to be bribed in order to do it.
	But, of course, that's what these people are always about.
	Everything is about bribery or blackmail with money.
	And so, when he says that Trump is a pragmatic leader here, look, that's what the Constitution says.
	You know, the Dobbs decision simply followed the Tenth Amendment.
	And so I would say to the pro-life leaders who think that the appropriate strategy is to ban abortions by a law from Congress, I would say to them, well, then change the Constitution.
	Because Congress has no more authority to ban abortion than the Supreme Court did.
	And I don't like abortion.
	You know that from listening to me.
	I just think we need to follow the Constitution instead of having a lawless Congress like we had a lawless Supreme Court that resulted in the death of nearly 70 million babies over 50 years.
	But the pragmatic aspect of it, he's right about.
	I think that if you look at it from a practical standpoint, I say this every time it comes up, if you ban abortion from Washington with a Republican majority, the Democrat governors and the Democrat states will ignore that.
	Why? Because you don't have any authority to do that.
	Just like we've had medical marijuana ignoring their war on drugs because they don't have any constitutional authority for that.
	They never pass a constitutional amendment like they did with alcohol prohibition.
	And so the Democrats will ignore it.
	They'll continue to kill babies. However, when the Democrats get in and say everybody can kill babies at any age that they want, we know from experience that all the Republican states will fall in line.
	And so from a pragmatic standpoint, you're not saving any babies' lives.
	I really believe that. I really believe that, or I would not support that, but I think you also have to follow the law as well.
	Bulldog says, Trump's an equal opportunity grifter.
	Brian Deb McCartney, what absolute drivel from the pillow man.
	Yeah. It is.
	It is. Absolutely. DGA, Lindell on a right-side broadcast was calling the jab the mark of the beast.
	30 minutes later, Trump was pushing it and bragging about it.
	These guys are all frauds.
	Yeah, I agree. You know, it's just like Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	Yes, it's killing people.
	Stop it. But she supports Trump.
	And Trump, up until just a couple of months ago, All of his supporters in the media couldn't get him to stop talking about it.
	Wayne Allyn Root. So many of them.
	Alex Jones, stop talking about this.
	He wouldn't listen to them.
	He's finally listening and taking direction.
	He is taking direction.
	He's smart enough right now, after this debate, and after what happened with Biden, that he's finally shut up and let these Democrats just stew in their own publicity.
	And I think that's a smart thing to do.
	And he's taking their political advice, and he's shutting up about the vaccine, but he's still proud of it.
	And if you were to ask him, I guarantee you that if you were to ask him this question at a debate, I would love to be the one to ask him.
	If you ask him this question about the vaccine, he would absolutely be compelled to boast about it to this day.
	They've got him not talking about it, but if you push that button, he would brag about it.
	On Rumble, Deb G. Kinney says it's a kill pill.
	Must promote death at all costs.
	I've never seen so many people want to kill babies.
	It's so sad. It absolutely is.
	It absolutely is. If you can't kill them with an abortion, you can't rip them apart, kill them with a pill.
	If you can't do either one of those, then maybe we can mutilate them.
	At least sterilize them, if we don't kill them and drive them insane.
	Well, we're going to take a real quick break, and we're going to come back with a little bit more about the Biden pageant.
	We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, I thought it was interesting to see what Jon Stewart said about this.
	He's getting attacked by a lot of people.
	He's being told, get on board or shut the F up.
	Welcome to the club.
	So he's with the Democrats and they're telling him, you get on board and you back Biden or you shut up.
	And I've had the same thing told to me since 2020.
	You know, get on board or you're fired type of thing.
	And it's like, no, I'm not getting on board that Trump train.
	Not getting on board.
	And so it is kind of interesting to see this groupthink mentality.
	And to see it mirrored now in the Democrats.
	And Biden is becoming just like Trump, and the Republicans are becoming just like the GOP. I mean, the Democrats are becoming.
	I can't even tell them apart, see?
	But in the aftermath of this debate, when he went on with George Stephanopoulos, I think the most disqualifying thing I've seen from Biden, more so than his Parkinson's, is when he said, yeah, I'm out here, I'm running this campaign, I'm running the world.
	It's like, oh, oh, stop right there.
	Stop right there. Nobody has a problem with that.
	As a matter of fact, the Republicans think that it's the job of the president to run the world.
	They think it's the job of the president, of course, to run everything in America, but even the world.
	You know, the American empire needs to be running the world.
	No? And if we're going to have the world run by one of these two people, I mean, can we find anybody out there who would be morally, ethically, or pragmatically fit for the job to run the world?
	These guys are unqualified in every regard.
	But Jon Stewart said, well, for a campaign that is based on honesty and decency, what's all this blatant BS about his health?
	Exactly. He loves to talk about how honest he is.
	Well, you know, I may be an elderly old man, but hey, I'm telling you the truth.
	You didn't tell us the truth even about your health, and we can all see that you're lying.
	He said there was no real primary.
	Biden ran against Dean Phillips, and let me say this, authoritarianism and Trump aren't the only threats our democracy faces.
	An arthritic status quo is Unable or unwilling to respond to the concerns of voters who just received new and urgent information.
	Is this new information?
	Come on, Jon Stewart.
	This is not new.
	We've been talking about this for years.
	You can see it yourself. And you're even saying that now.
	Look, you can see how obviously infirm he is when he's saying that he's just doing fine.
	They say, get on board or shut the F up.
	It's not a particularly compelling pro-democracy bumper sticker, is it?
	But what are you going to do?
	Well, that's what we're hearing from everybody.
	Now, Fetterman, Senator Fetterman, says, hey, it's okay if he needs to go to bed at 8 o'clock.
	If he's got a bedtime, it's okay.
	At least he's not a liar.
	He's lying about his health.
	He's lying about everything.
	But he said, CNN has also been reporting that, CNN host asked him, so they've always been reporting that Biden told Democrat governors last week that part of his plan going forward is to stop scheduling events after 8 p.m.
	so he can get some more sleep. And of course, that's perfectly fine because we all know that this guy who's running the world, nothing happens in the world after 8 p.m.
	Eastern time, right? So it also comes out that Biden skipped his meeting in 2022 with German Chancellor, so he could go to sleep. And he sent Anthony Blinken in his place. And of course Chris O'Donnell would be fine with that, because Chris O'Donnell wants Anthony Blinken and the rest of the staff that you may or may not know their names, even some other people behind the scenes, maybe some intelligence agencies that are running the show, have them on stage with the presidential
	candidate so they can answer the questions. That's what Chris O'Donnell thinks.
	Well Biden took naps during each of the six days that he was preparing for this Now, he took a whole week off to prepare for the debate.
	He never began before 11 a.m., but he says that he's trying not to work past 8 p.m.
	Even in the call to some governors, he said that his workday was from 10 to 4.
	So Babylon Bee has gotten his work schedule, and it goes something like this.
	10 a.m., wake-up call.
	10.15 p.m. We're good to go.
	11.45 a second morning briefing to again remind him that he's the president.
	Then lunch. Then 12.30 ice cream treat if he finishes all of his vegetables.
	1.00 p.m. after lunch briefing to again remind him he's president.
	1.15 a power nap.
	1.45 change his diaper and take pills.
	2 p.m., destroy America.
	2.30, tennis with the boys.
	3 p.m., afternoon briefing to remind him what was discussed in the previous three briefings.
	3.15, take a daily regimen of intravenous drugs to stay lucid.
	3.30, arrive late to deliver a teleprompter address to a soundstage.
	4 p.m., quitting time.
	I said, well, you know, not even George Washington had a schedule that was this jam-packed.
	Yeah, yeah, well, they're doing what in my name?
	But see, even the Babylon Bee conservatives said, only six hours?
	How can he possibly run the country?
	See, even the conservatives think that Biden should run the country.
	And that's the most disqualifying thing of all for American politics.
	He shouldn't run the country, and he shouldn't try to run the world.
	But that's where we are in America.
	Thank you for listening. Have a good day.
	Let me tell you.
	The David Knight Show.
	You can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?

▲