Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 8, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:43

The David Knight Show - 07/08/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds Sorry.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 8th of July, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at what happened in France.
	Very curious results.
	A tremendous swing at the last minute.
	It should be an indication for many people as to what might happen here.
	And as they're preparing everybody for one result, they might just push in another one.
	Because it is, after all, a selection.
	And we'll talk about some of that as well.
	We'll talk about the Parkinson's likely diagnosis.
	But again, this is from the distance.
	But it does seem to fit for Biden.
	We'll also talk about the new document dump from Epstein.
	Talking about Trump's pedo involvement there.
	But we're going to begin by talking about...
	When we talk about France, we're going to talk about what we have seen over the last few days, on the 4th of July.
	Whatever happened to this country?
	Is it a free country?
	Was it ever a free country?
	How do we find real freedom?
	We're going to talk about all that when we come back.
	Also, people who are keeping cars going forever.
	It's a very hopeful sign, quite frankly.
	We'll be right back. Yeah, I'm very excited to see people who are, instead of taking cash for clunkers, are giving clunkers new life.
	This is something that is going to be very important for all of us.
	We may wind up living in a society that looks very much like a cross between the Amish and Mad Max, if you can imagine such a thing.
	We're going to have to learn how to do some things ourselves.
	We've become too dependent.
	By the way, interesting article, too, about what is happening with hydrogen fuel.
	A big contract with Walmart for their semis.
	We've got a lot to talk about today.
	Let's begin with France. A kind of civil war, said some of the people that were there.
	And, of course, this is a headline from CNBC. It's going to be the end of the world if the far right won.
	Now, I don't follow the French politics.
	I don't know what these people are about.
	All I know is that anybody who is not a communist is far right, according to the press here.
	And this is from CNBC. Characterize the election as a nationalist, anti-immigration, national rally party bills on its initial win in the first round of voting.
	You know, they had just had a big win in the European Union Parliament elections.
	That's what caused Macron to hold the election.
	And then, lo and behold, you know, they come in and they come in first place.
	So they win, surprise everybody in the European Union Parliament election.
	Macron decides to call election.
	The first round of the election, one week before this election that happened over the weekend, one week before that, they again came in in a very strong first place.
	And then suddenly, within a week, they fell to third place.
	Who would imagine that? The leftists and the communists took first place.
	Macron came from third and moved up to second.
	And the people who had had two elections in a row, Featuring very strongly.
	Came in third.
	I wonder what happened.
	You know, I've talked about this a long time before people started talking about the 2020 election.
	I pointed out how Smartmatic, one of the first electronic voting machine companies, began in Venezuela by a couple of cronies of Hugo Chavez.
	And he never lost another election after they started using Smartmatic machines.
	Now, Smartmatic, they're no longer owned by these guys.
	They're probably owned by people who are even worse.
	Some globalists are even worse than Hugo Chavez.
	But they've been bought and sold multiple times.
	And it's not just a Smartmatic issue.
	Any of these machines can be done.
	So they can be rigged by the people who make them.
	They can be hacked by anybody.
	Anybody. Not just the people there at that physical site.
	They can be hacked anywhere from anywhere in the world, including hostile nations can hack these.
	This is why we should never use electronic voting machines.
	It has nothing to do with any particular brand, but it has to do with the entire concept.
	Look, there is nothing that is secure.
	Nothing is secure from somebody who wants to hack.
	Do you think somebody would be interested in hacking an election campaign?
	That has the biggest pot of gold the world has ever seen.
	That's what Washington D.C. is to criminals.
	The biggest pot of gold the world has ever seen.
	Tens of trillions of dollars there just for the asking.
	You can give a politician a few thousand dollars, you can get back millions or billions.
	And so do you think people would be interested in hacking that election?
	It's just ridiculous to put that.
	We've had the NSA hacked.
	The CIA has been hacked.
	The Defense Department's been hacked.
	The Justice Department has been hacked.
	All of these government agencies have been hacked.
	Big private corporations have been hacked.
	Everybody has been hacked.
	Why wouldn't you think that an election could be and would be hacked?
	And so, when you look at Hugo Chavez and his record, they had a long documented record of accusations of rigged elections in several Mexican provinces, in Philippines.
	They had a big scandal in the Philippines where they believed that the elections had been hacked, and in Brazil.
	And I bring this up because when I look at this French election, In Brazil, when Lula was...
	Lula, I think, was the guy.
	And there was a woman who replaced him.
	He was a full-on Marxist.
	No question about it.
	Replaced by another one.
	And she was lagging behind in all the polls.
	And the day before the election, she went to a big soccer match.
	They call it a football match.
	They don't know any better. A big football game, which is what the rest of the world calls soccer.
	And she goes to a big football game, and she's booed off the stage.
	When they introduce her, the place just erupts into all boos.
	60,000 people. The next day...
	She's losing significantly.
	And then all of a sudden, all of the reporting equipment and everything goes down.
	It all goes down.
	The whole network goes down.
	It goes black. And when it comes back up, lo and behold, she is now winning.
	They just switched roles, switched places.
	So now instead of her losing 60-40, she's winning 60-40.
	Nothing to see there. I'm sure that it was completely honest.
	Aren't you? Okay, so first round of voting.
	They win. The conservative French win way out ahead.
	They were way out ahead with the European Union Parliament.
	But then one week later, after they won the first round, they fall to third place.
	How did that happen?
	So... People were talking about it.
	They said, well, it's a very, very tense time.
	It's the first time that the far right is winning at the first turn, first round of the ballot.
	It's a very big deal. We are looking at kind of having a civil war here, and the left was already starting to riot in anticipation.
	And notice how they always, again, this is CNBC, they always refer, there is no such thing as conservatives or right wing.
	It's far right.
	Far right. France's far right RN rejects the extremist label, saying it stands up for French values, culture, and citizens at a time when many are fed up with the political establishment that's been led by Macron since 2017.
	But their opponents and critics warn that France is on the brink of a political catastrophe, if an overtly anti-immigration.
	How could we ever have a country that is anti-immigration?
	I mean, we need to just bring in all the people that we can that aren't French, right?
	Nationalist and Euroskeptic Party.
	Yeah, you know, they could possibly get out of the European Union like the UK did.
	Can't have that happen, can we?
	So, interestingly enough, they managed to head that off.
	The first round of the election resulted in the far right RN winning 33% of the vote.
	The left wing, actually they were far left, far left, socialists and communists.
	They put together a coalition of socialists, communists and greens, which are distinctions without a difference.
	So the left-wing new popular front garnered 28% in the first round.
	It was the conservatives, 33%.
	The communists, 28%.
	And Macron, 20%.
	Then what happened over the weekend when they had the second round?
	Well, the nationalists went from 33% down to 25% in third place.
	The far left went from 28% up to 33%.
	They switched places.
	You know, just like that Brazilian election, they switched places.
	Except it was even worse, because Macron, that was at 20%, Managed to go to 28 and come in in second place.
	Oh, you know, there you go.
	Just one week. The Rothschild banker and the EU bureaucrats managed to pull this thing off.
	Somehow. Somehow.
	So what kind of a coalition is this going to be?
	Well, the... They're not sure who's going to manage this, because as soon as Macron said he's going to hold an election, all the radical left said, we've got to stop the Nationalist Party from getting power.
	So they put together this coalition that went from second place to first place, from the first round to the second round.
	They call themselves the New Popular Front.
	There had been a group called the Popular Front to block fascists from taking power in 1936.
	So they were essentially calling the conservatives fascists.
	And what does it consist of?
	Well, they have the French Socialist Party, the Green Ecologist Party, the French Communist Party, And the center-left, Place Public, Public Place, and other smaller parties.
	And of course, that center-left label, you can discount that, that's coming from CNBC. So, it's going to be far-left and Marxists that they handed the election to.
	So, who's going to run this thing?
	Well, they've got so many different parties there, they don't really know who's in charge of it.
	Is it going to be a Rothschild banker?
	Is it going to be the UN? Is it going to be NATO? Who's going to run this thing?
	Well, there remains to be seen.
	They said it's hard to say what's going to happen.
	And what are their policies? Well, the only thing that we know of this new coalition, the new, the National Front, or whatever, the NFP, forget what the acronym was, they have pledged to immediately recognize the Palestinian state.
	They want to raise the minimum monthly wage, because, you know, they're communists, and they want to raise pensions, because they're communists.
	Everybody was upset at Macron because he had raised the French retirement age from 62 to 64.
	They thought that could not last.
	And then we have in the UK. This is not a surprise.
	We look at the UK elections.
	This graphic, I think, says it's best from Sky News.
	You can see the different parties there with their vote totals.
	Labor running away with it all at 410.
	Conservatives falling back to 131.
	What a pathetic... display of quote unquote conservative policies Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak have been.
	So you've got Labour at 410, the Liberal Democrats at 61, the Scottish National Party, might as well be the Socialist National Party.
	So together with those, there are almost 500 seats, whereas on the Conservative reform side, you've got 131 Conservative, only 13 reform seats.
	However, it should be interesting, because Nigel Farage will be in the House of Commons.
	Ha ha ha! I would love to see that.
	And I'm sure that we will see many clips that are very interesting.
	He was amazing when he was in the European Union as a member of that legislature.
	I remember the first time I saw him.
	He came after the Greek government because they had thrown out an elected official and put in a Goldman Sachs banker.
	Trying to remember which one it was.
	Doesn't matter, does it?
	How dare you in the nation that was the cradle of democracy and voting and all this kind of stuff to throw out the elected representative and put in a technocrat.
	That was the first time they started using these terms like technocrat.
	And they were not directly referring back to the technocracy of the 1930s, people like Elon Musk and others.
	But it was very interesting.
	And so it should be very interesting there in the House of Commons.
	They have very, very lively debates.
	When Karen and I got married and we went to England, I had three months between the time I graduated in December when my job started in March in Texas.
	And so we just, you know, had no money, but we just hung out and did everything we could for free.
	Went to one museum after the other.
	We went to the Old Bailey criminal trial and watched that.
	And for a while.
	And then we also went into the House of Commons on a day that they questioned the Prime Minister, which is like on Thursdays.
	I had Margaret Thatcher was the Prime Minister, and so it was always a very interesting back and forth that was happening there.
	And I'm sure that when it comes time for Nigel Farage to speak, he'll be every bit as entertaining as Thatcher was going against...
	The left in the UK at the time.
	So that's going to be an interesting thing, and I think that you're going to see the Reform Party grow significantly, and I think you're going to see the thoroughly discredited conservatives drop.
	But the reason I cover this first is because all the news that I see over the weekend was all about Biden's mental capacity, as if he was ever in charge.
	Come on, folks, let's not pretend that these guys are actually running the government.
	Let's get serious about this.
	It's a lot of fun to pretend about that, and we're going to probably have some kind of a reality TV melodrama for the next few months, and maybe even at the Democrat convention, the Republican convention is not going to be much of a melodrama.
	They're going to do all of it behind closed doors.
	Trump has got that completely locked down with his daughter-in-law in charge, so they're not even going to have a platform discussion.
	You know, for things like abortion and things like that.
	They'll do all of that behind closed doors.
	They're not going to have the Republican delegates even have a say.
	It's all going to be dictated from the top down, from the top down by Trump.
	So the Democrat side may be kind of interesting and everybody wants to talk about that.
	And we will get around to that. There's some things that I think are far more relevant and more interesting that we're going to talk about first. But I wanted to talk about this and what happened in France. Because the problem is when you talk about it, it could be a civil war.
	And everybody was saying that in the lead-up to it.
	If the left doesn't get their way, it's going to be a civil war.
	You notice that there hasn't been a civil war.
	There hasn't been rioting in the streets after those horrible far-right extremists of the National Party.
	After they lost, they didn't burn everything down.
	Everybody was expecting the left to do that.
	And it was going to be mostly peaceful as they burned down the country.
	And so when we look at this election...
	And we look at what is happening with Biden, and we look at the polls and the rest of this stuff.
	Are they setting up the American people for a rope-a-dope?
	Everybody, oh yes, absolutely certain, Trump is going to win.
	Well, what happens if he doesn't?
	You've got people like Steve Bannon, Jack Posobiec, Donald Trump himself, Alex Jones, people like that.
	This is it.
	We've got to have a revolution.
	We're going to have to have a civil war.
	People we know.
	Karen said, look at this on Facebook.
	Somebody we know. Somebody who's a Christian.
	Said, well, you know, if this election, Trump doesn't win this election, it's over.
	We're going to have to fight. You know, all this rest of the stuff.
	It's like, wow, really? You're really ready to go into a civil war?
	Over this Democrat, narcissist, billionaire, pedophile?
	You have a civil war over him?
	It's all about him.
	As a matter of fact, we had a listener send me this.
	Said, look at this. This is Blake Master's sign in Arizona.
	Blake Master's, who was a friend of Peter Thiel.
	Peter Thiel put him forward.
	And so, of course, you know, Peter Thiel's money and his endorsement of Trump, Trump-endorsed Blake Master's.
	And Blake Masters ran for Senate and lost because he's not a real conservative.
	When Dobbs came out, he quickly scrambled.
	Remember I talked about that? He scrambled and changed his website, completely erased all the stuff, you know, about how pro-life he was and backtracked.
	And he lost. Well, now he's back and he's running for Congress.
	And of course, he's got Trump's endorsement again.
	And he endorses Trump.
	Look at this sign. Pro-Trump, pro-Trump, pro-Trump.
	Blake Masters for Congress.
	Wow, I guess we can just forget about any issues.
	The only issue is Trump.
	You're either for him or against him, right?
	He's pro-Trump.
	That's all you need to know. You don't need to know what Blake Masters is on any of the issues because just like his master Trump that he claims to love, he's malleable on the issues.
	He'll tell you whatever you want to hear.
	And then he'll do whatever people pay him to do.
	When he gets into office.
	Well, when we come back, we're going to take a look at some 4th of July news.
	I want to thank Guard Goldsmith for standing in on 4th of July, doing an excellent job as he always does.
	It's always great to have Guard come in and do the show.
	And I appreciate him doing it on the 4th of July, of all things.
	I really did need a rest.
	And I took the time off, and I had another AFib thing yesterday, or yeah, it was actually Saturday night and Sunday.
	But, you know, so I need to have a rest every once in a while, and it's great to know that the guard can always take this over.
	I really do appreciate that.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Fourth of July, 1872.
	Mark Twain happened to be in London.
	And there was a meeting of Americans and British in London, and he was there to speak.
	A Gathering of Americans in London, July 4th, 1872.
	And I thought his speech was kind of interesting.
	I made a couple of updates.
	He referred to people as, he said, you know, we're a nation that's developed.
	Washington, Franklin, a William Tweed.
	Remember Boss Tweed and the corruption in New York that was famous at that time.
	A Longfellow, a Motley, a Jay Gould, a Samuel Pomeroy, so forth.
	So, you know, we can update this with some contemporary figures.
	We are a country that has developed a Washington, a Franklin, a Bill Gates, a Larry Fink, an occasional Cortex, a Taylor Swift, a Trump, and a Biden.
	Now, what's not to love about America?
	I mean, are we the greatest country ever?
	USA! USA! Who else is going to come up with a Taylor Swift, a Trump, and a Biden to be the icons of this country?
	And of course, occasional cortex.
	He says we also have a Congress, which has never had its equal in some respects.
	You know, that brings higher prices than any other in the world.
	That's still true today, isn't it?
	We've still got a Congress that is the most expensive to buy anywhere in the world.
	And he says, we have a criminal jury system, which is superior to any other in the world.
	Its efficiency is only marred by the difficulty of finding 12 men every day who don't know anything and can't read.
	That's kind of like the Trump juries, right?
	We have an insanity plea that would have saved Cain, he said.
	And then he began talking about the railway system, which he had a particular disdain for.
	The fact that the railway system at the time was known for running over people.
	You know, most of the things were not moving that fast in those days.
	Some people kind of, I guess, underestimated the danger of the railroad and maybe did not get out of the way quickly enough.
	But today, the real killer in our society, of course, is not the railway, but the public health system.
	I think Mark Twain would have appreciated the irony, don't you?
	So, let me just replace railway system with public health.
	I refer with effusion to our public health system, which consents to let us live, though it might do the opposite, being our owners.
	He says the public health system seriously regretted the killing of some, on our particular case, 30 million people worldwide.
	For him, with the railroad, it's only 30,000 people.
	And it went so far as to pay some of them, voluntarily, of course, for the meanest of us would not claim that we possess a court treacherous enough to enforce a law against a railway company.
	Well, if they give anybody compensation, they have to do it.
	Well, we haven't seen that.
	As a matter of fact, even the people who have tried to go before court, very few of them have gotten any compensation.
	We had a couple of people who have recovered compensation from a treacherous employer who tried to force an injection on them.
	But he said, but thank heaven, the pharma companies are generally disposed to do the right and kindly thing without compulsion.
	Public health system as well, right?
	I know of an instance which greatly touched me at the time.
	He said after an accident, and he's talking about the railroad companies, but we could kind of apply that, they sent home the remains of a dear distant old relative of mine in a basket with a remark, please state what figure you hold him at and return the basket.
	He says now there couldn't be anything friendlier than that.
	Well, it certainly is friendlier than our pharmaceutical and public health masters.
	The military-industrial complex that ran this mass murder, they didn't voluntarily help anybody.
	They didn't tell us the name or price, did they?
	They named the price. Oh, by the way, we'll name the price, said Trump.
	You point the finger at somebody and say they got COVID, $13,000.
	You put them on a ventilator, I'll give you $39,000.
	And then after they die, we'll bribe the family to go with your diagnosis that they died from COVID. Not from remdesivir.
	Not from the ventilator.
	Not from neglect and malpractice and do not resuscitate orders.
	And if they go along with that, we'll give them $6,000 for the funeral.
	How about that? Oh, and we'll give you 20% for everything that you do while they're in the hospital.
	While you're killing them.
	How about that? You know, over the weekend, we were invited to a local picnic, and I wanted to meet some local people, and there has a local paper.
	And I said, oh, what kind of news do you cover?
	And he said, well, you know, we really had to reinvent things in 2020.
	He said, in 2020? They shut down all the sports, and we're like, what are we going to report on?
	I was like, what?
	What are you going to report on?
	I mean, it was a five-alarm fire.
	We had everything locked down.
	I sat there quietly because I was invited as a guest.
	Didn't say anything. It was very nice.
	I got home. We're laughing about it.
	My son said, yeah, nothing of any interest happened in 2020 that a paper would be interested in reporting.
	It's unbelievable. Anyway, of course, they've won several awards because of that kind of reporting.
	That's exactly the kind of reporting that gets rewarded.
	If you start talking about what's really going on, you'd get drummed out of business.
	Anyway, so that was an example of what Mark Twain was going to talk about on the 4th of July in London in 1872.
	But then he put a footnote, and he says, well, the problem is...
	At least the above speech which I was going to make, but which our U.S. government minister, General Schnecht, presided.
	And after a blessing, he got up and made a great, long, inconceivably dull harangue and wound up saying that inasmuch as speechmaking did not seem to exhilarate the guests much, all further oratory would be dispensed with during the evening.
	And we could just sit and talk privately to our elbow neighbors and have a good sociable time.
	It is known that the consequence of that remark, 44 perfected speeches died in the womb.
	All these people are so excited to get up and make a speech.
	He says, the depression, the gloom, the solemnity that reigned over the banquet from that time forth will be a lasting memory with the many that were there.
	By that one thoughtless remark, the general lost 44 of the best friends he had in England.
	They owe him to get up and make a speech.
	It's a different time, I guess, on Rockfin.
	Thank you very much, Dustin.
	I appreciate that. Dustin Helm.
	Well, when we look at the state of our nation, going back to April, there was a bipartisan Senate resolution, 569, and it's been languishing without anything happening to it since it was introduced at the beginning of April.
	It was a resolution that Where more than 100 advocates urged the Senate to designate religious freedom as a fundamental right.
	Have they not read the Constitution?
	Perhaps not. Because, you know, we are supposed to have free speech, but even...
	The Supreme Court agrees.
	The Supreme Court, both Trump and Biden administration, the Congress, both Republican and Democrat, they all agree that it's just fine for corporations to censor people if the government tells them to.
	That it's not the digital public square, even though it is.
	So you can forget about the free speech of the people.
	You know, it's kind of interesting.
	Americans never had as much free speech as they were given with social media.
	Only to have it yanked away from them by the government.
	What's that about? You want to get some people angry?
	Well, give them something that they've never had before.
	Let them enjoy it for a little bit and then yank it away from them.
	So if we get about free speech, what about the free press?
	Well, that's banned. You know, we've got NewsGuard.
	We've got social media censorship as well.
	All these other things. So forget about the free press.
	What about peaceful assembly?
	You know, like January the 6th?
	No. Can't have that.
	What about being able to redress your grievances?
	Well, you might get on a list.
	You might also get banned.
	You also might get a knock on the door from the FBI. You want to redress your grievances?
	Well, don't think about running for office, because we're not going to let you on the ballot, and we're not going to let you into the debates.
	So forget about redressing your grievances as well.
	So that leaves religious freedom.
	And we need to have the Senate say that religious freedom is a fundamental right?
	That's why it's in the Bill of Rights.
	But I guess none of these guys actually read the Constitution, and they really don't care about this resolution because they didn't pass it either.
	Over 100 religious freedom advocates and groups from various religious backgrounds called on Congress back in April to affirm religious freedom as a fundamental right by passing a resolution to recognize the global threats to religious liberty.
	Yeah, when we look at this, it was really about global threats.
	They were pretending, of course, that You know, we're secure because we've got that piece of paper called the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, so we don't have to worry about that here at home, I guess, maybe.
	It was focused on places like Nigeria and India, Iran, where they imprison and kill Christians.
	But then when you look at what happened on the 4th of July, we had a prohibition against people carrying crosses.
	And the Christians actually double-crossed the people who were trying to prohibit it.
	Here they are in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, where the council said, we don't want any religious symbols on the Fourth of July parade.
	See everybody carrying crosses?
	Putting crosses on their shirts?
	Carrying wooden crosses? Here's what we think of your prohibition.
	Yeah, they just shoved it right down their throats.
	So, the Bill of Rights doesn't protect us.
	It outlines some very important principles, which our politicians and bureaucrats could not care less about.
	We have to care about it.
	We have to pick up your cross and carry it.
	If you want to have freedom, that's the lesson of this Fourth of July.
	And then we have Anthony Blinken.
	Giving an address with the State Department where they were bragging about the fact that they now have a new AI plan to be able to do censorship better.
	AI's potential to analyze vast amounts of data in real time, identify trends, and provide insights is transforming the way we approach global challenges.
	Now, that's the underling who was there to introduce Anthony Blinken, as Technocracy News says.
	Blinken, member of the Trilateral Commission, is gleeful for the gift of AI so that he can crush free speech once and for all.
	Their quest started in 1981, says the Technocracy News, when they crushed Anthony Sutton's academic career in our scholarly books, Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes 1 and 2.
	Trilateral David Rockefeller later bragged about how they had deceived the world.
	Well, we all know what they're doing.
	The question is, when are we going to do something about it?
	And how do we do something about it?
	Well, we do it at the most local level, just like those people in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.
	Google has an app called Jigsaw.
	And I guess they want to cut us up, literally, into different people.
	But they present it differently.
	I don't know how they argue the etymology of that word, Jigsaw.
	Since 2017, Jigsaw has used machine learning to enable more voices to participate in online conversation.
	Have you noticed that? Have you noticed how Google has been enabling more voices to participate in conversation?
	You notice how they've been expanding our free speech everywhere?
	No, I didn't notice that either.
	By identifying and mitigating toxicity that frequently reduces participation in online debates.
	Well, the most toxic thing I've ever seen is what YouTube does to ban people.
	And here's a good example of this.
	I saw this over the weekend, and it had a very interesting title.
	It said, YouTube is asking me to edit me out of my videos.
	And this is a guy who, he's got a channel.
	I've seen some of his videos before.
	It's kind of interesting. He does great titles.
	And so he caught me once before with a video.
	He said, nobody will ever hear a singer like this again.
	And what it was, was a clip of Judy Garland singing Somewhere Over the Rainbow as a young girl.
	And he showed, because the tools now can analyze the waveforms and put them on a grid of the 12-note system that we have here.
	And so he said, look at this, you know, she's singing and it just kind of swoops down flat and it goes up a little bit sharp and then comes back down even before the vibrato starts, I think.
	And he goes, and it sounds natural to your ear, but she's off pitch and then finally comes back into pitch.
	She knows where it is, but she's playing around with it.
	He said, that'll never be allowed today.
	They rigidly push everything onto a grid.
	And the more rigid they get about it, the more it sounds like auto-tuning because the more it is like auto-tuning.
	And so I said, you'll never hear a singer like that again.
	Now, he says, so YouTube is asking me to edit me out of my video.
	And so he is somebody who...
	There he is right there.
	He also talks about guitar.
	And so I'm going to play for you a little bit of what he said YouTube was doing.
	And actually, unlike when they called a copyright strike on me, they just took down my video.
	When I did the video about the creation of the Federal Reserve on its 100th anniversary.
	It's a wonderful lie.
	And I used clips, a few little clips, from It's a Wonderful Life, along with my commentary about the creation of the Federal Reserve and the skullduggery and things like that that were done as part of that.
	And the predictions about how it would do precisely what it's been doing for the last, now, 111 years.
	It's 111 this year.
	It will be 111. What was it?
	December 23rd, I think. Anyway, it'll be 11-1, just like Frodo.
	Not Frodo. Bilbo.
	Anyway. But, you know, they took it down, and it was fair use.
	And as I pointed out...
	The entire movie, where I took the clips from, the entire movie of This Wonderful Life was up at the time.
	Had been up for a decade.
	Had a million views.
	And they came after me for something that was fair use.
	A couple of clips I put here and there.
	Comparing the bank runs that were engineered by the guy that was similar to J.P. Morgan and that type of thing.
	Drawing those parallels to it.
	So they took it down for that.
	Now here's what they're doing now.
	They show you The area of the video that they say has a copyright claim.
	And listen to what they did to this guy.
	So recently on the channel, I did a video about copyright and explained what happens when you upload a video to YouTube.
	And if you look at anything that is somebody else's copyright material, then it's going to get copyright claimed and you won't get the ad revenue for that particular video.
	But there are other arrangements and I do describe all of those in that video.
	The reason for this one is because when I was making that video I had a look through my channel to see which videos had been blocked and I thought well I will re-edit them so that people can watch my previous analysis videos that have been blocked and just get rid of the parts that are claimed.
	I was breaking down the guitar techniques and you can see on the screen here we've got these blue rectangles where it says Where the copyright material starts and where the content is and kind of when it ends.
	You can see these little blocks of when I'm playing part of the song and then analyzing it and demonstrating techniques.
	But I did have a little look through and we'll just have a look.
	This is the beginning of this rectangle here and see what it is.
	So there we have it again.
	And just as a guide, when we're playing along to this, you want to be in your mind on the pentatonic shape 1 here, 12th fret, as you probably noticed earlier on when I was playing through.
	We've got these unison bends as well.
	Now, I don't know if it's just me, but that doesn't sound like David Bowie singing or any of the performance.
	So this is the reason that it's a bit frustrating.
	It's because this is clearly me playing the guitar, but the start of this section is claiming this as copyright content, that this is somebody's song, that this is somebody's performance.
	I let it play on. Kind of like that.
	And it's all within our shape.
	That's pretty much what you want to be playing through.
	Just throughout this whole performance, we've got lots of little techniques going on like that.
	So this is now quite a long segment, and you can see clearly the rectangle starts here, and this is well into this segment that this is claimed, and none of this is copyright using these techniques on the guitar.
	I'm not playing anything from the song here.
	I'm demonstrating unison bends, which is a guitar technique, and you know bends, hammer-ons and pull-offs, so things that every guitarist uses.
	And you can't copyright bends or hammer-ons and pull-offs or slides on a guitar.
	Or when you're singing, you can't copyright that and say I own that technique, nobody else is now allowed to do it.
	So I was amazed that they are claiming this part of the video.
	I mean I get it for maybe sections where we're listening to it and then I'm demonstrating it, and even still, when you're talking about using it in that way, it's still what I would consider fair use of listening to somebody play a guitar solo and then me explaining exactly what's going on in the solo, what techniques they're using and how they're achieving their sound.
	I see that as fair use.
	I would consider that fair use, that I'm not just playing a song and uploading it.
	Okay, so you get the idea.
	And think about the hypocrisy that's here.
	And it all focuses now on AI. He's not talking about anything that's political.
	There's nothing controversial about these musicians that they want to try to disappear or anything like that.
	No, what this is now about with this censorship is AI. Consider the hypocrisy of the fact that AI is out there, whether it's YouTube or, I mean, whether it's Google or whether it's one of these other tech companies, they're out there stealing everything from everybody.
	It's built on theft.
	Built on theft about watching you, about watching everyone's content, including musical content.
	It's all about theft.
	And then consider the fact that it is the AI itself that is flagging him talking about basic guitar techniques like slides, hammer-ons and pull-offs and things like that.
	It's just, and this is our future, folks.
	Got to get away from YouTube.
	Got to get away from these people.
	They are going to steal everything for themselves.
	And they will leave you absolutely nothing that you can talk about.
	Because they want to own everything.
	And that includes information.
	You will own nothing.
	None of that information.
	They will tell you to take yourself out of your own video.
	Or else. Don't do business with people like that.
	I mean, I don't even have to make that decision.
	They took down my Christmas music that I had performed.
	Canceled my entire channel.
	Not the first time I've been cancelled on YouTube without any explanation.
	So, now expanding our work, says YouTube, to enable every voice to be meaningfully heard.
	What cynical liars they are.
	I despise Google.
	You know, Steve Jobs knew where they were before he died.
	He says, their mottos don't be evil.
	He goes, yeah, right, right.
	He knew how evil they were before most people did.
	A set of tools, in the words of Lisa Skirch, allows a large-scale exchange of views and an iterative discussion, allowing participants to evolve in their understanding.
	Is that what you see happening on anything that's controlled by Google?
	By any of these social media companies?
	By the way, the guy who did that, the name of his channel is Wings of Pegasus.
	It's very good. We believe that when high-quality moderation, bridging techniques, and effective sense-making...
	Effective sense-making?
	What a load of Bolshevik.
	These people are full of Bolshevik, aren't they?
	When they work together, more individuals will participate.
	And they will participate more deeply, allowing a more complete picture of the community to evolve.
	These are the same anti-white racists who talk about diversity all the time.
	You know what we need to do?
	We need to paraphrase Carl Hesse's slogan that he wrote for Goldwater.
	Extremism in defense of free speech is no vice.
	Moderation of content to be kind, quote-unquote, is no virtue.
	Folks, we've got to get over this idea that everybody's snowflake feelings have to be protected, and in order to do that, that we have to destroy free speech.
	No. No.
	Extremism in the protection of free speech is no vice.
	But it is interesting how everybody's spun this over the weekend.
	Heritage Foundation, and I'm no...
	I'm a fan of the Heritage Foundation, the largest conservative think tank that is out there.
	Why am I no fan of them?
	Because in 2018, they took the side of corporate censorship, just like the largest libertarian think tank, the Cato Institute, did.
	These tech companies can censor whoever they wish.
	We knew who they were censoring and why.
	We knew very clearly that it was all about politics.
	We knew that they were taking orders from the government.
	And they were reluctant to pull back from the stuff even after the documents were produced that showed that they were acting on orders of the government to censor people.
	And then even after we had the documents, and even after states started to take action against it, you have sellouts to the First Amendment like Amy Coney Barrett, who doesn't know what the First Amendment is.
	She couldn't answer that in her confirmation hearings.
	And she doesn't care to know.
	And she doesn't care to support free speech for the American public.
	They shut down these things on some technicalities.
	They basically punted and evaded their responsibility.
	Because, you see, they have a duty to protect the Constitution.
	That's what they said with Marbury v.
	Madison, except that when it's not politically expedient to do so, they do not protect the Constitution.
	So, Heritage Foundation went on in an interview with And it was on Steve Bannon's podcast.
	Steve Bannon is in jail.
	He's got somebody doing a guest hosting for him.
	And the head of the Heritage Foundation, President Kevin Roberts, is facing blowback because he said, we want to have a bloodless revolution.
	Well, I didn't see anything wrong with that.
	A bloodless revolution?
	We can't even talk about having a bloodless revolution now?
	And that was walking it back significantly from the kind of rhetoric that we see Bannon using all the time.
	Bannon and Jack Basovic and Trump himself, Alex Jones, these people out there calling for blood in the streets.
	Many times. And then they'll walk it back, you know.
	No, I didn't mean it.
	I said this. No, I'm saying something else now.
	See, I never said that before.
	Well, you did say it.
	You did say it. But Biden's campaign jumped on this comment, said Trump's allies are dreaming of a violent revolution to destroy every idea of America.
	I agree with that.
	I think that is exactly what they're being groomed for, and I've said it many times myself.
	Because they're not talking about reforming this corrupt system that we see operating on Trump, being used by the Department of Justice.
	It needs to be reformed, but they don't want reform, they want revenge.
	And they don't necessarily say they want it bloodless, either.
	That's why I say, when I look at this, I thought the Heritage Foundation was being quite a bit more responsible than Steve Bannon himself on Steve Bannon's podcast.
	As a matter of fact, if he had not been in jail, Steve Bannon would have probably said, well, I don't know about bloodless, let's make it bloody.
	I don't know. Trump distanced himself from the Heritage Foundation.
	They had something they called Project 2025.
	An initiative led by the Heritage Foundation Think Tank to come up with policy blueprints.
	Now, when Trump ran in 2016, I've said this many times, he had a wonderful policy blueprint To replace Obamacare.
	And it was a very conservative blueprint.
	I read it a couple of times on air.
	I said, this is perfect. I said, I don't know if he's going to do this.
	We see politicians making promises like this all the time.
	And I said at the time, I haven't heard Trump say a word about it, but it was not coming from some disconnected think tank like the Heritage Foundation.
	He has distanced himself from the Heritage Foundation like he did Julian Assange and WikiLeaks now.
	I don't know who the Heritage Foundation is.
	You know, that type of thing.
	But at the time, and it was about 7 to 10 points.
	I forget how many points there were.
	Different types of reforms that could be done to the health system to improve some of the problems that we have.
	First of all, allow competition across state lines.
	Allow people to own medical savings accounts and other things like that.
	And give them the, so that you have a marketplace, give them the information about the doctors and about the hospitals and what their record is.
	Make that available to the public so they can look it up.
	And compare doctors and see, you know, compare prices.
	Compare how good they are.
	What kind of a record do they have in terms of problems and things like that?
	So it had a lot of very good things in it.
	And as soon as the election was over, he never heard anything else about it.
	And I went back to look at it and they had taken the page down.
	You see, issues don't matter to Trump.
	They really don't.
	Whether it's coming from the Heritage Foundation or whether it's coming from his own campaign, he doesn't care about any of this stuff.
	This is just a fidget spinner for people who like to play with this stuff, to keep them busy, to entertain their imagination during the election process.
	He's got no commitments to any policy, especially conservative policies.
	So Heritage and Kevin Roberts are standing by the comment, even though Biden went out there and said, look, they want a violent revolution.
	No, he said bloodless. He said bloodless.
	And people are always doing this. They've done this type of thing with Biden as well.
	The conservatives did.
	I saw the comment over the weekend.
	Look, he called himself a black woman.
	No, he didn't. He was saying he served under Barack Obama.
	He was virtue signaling. Yeah, I know a lot of black people.
	And some of them are clean, like Barack Obama, right?
	Remember when he made that remark?
	He was saying, oh, I know Obama.
	I served with Obama. And then I had the first black female vice president.
	If you listen to the comment, you know what's going on with that.
	But everybody portrayed it as, oh, look, he thinks he's a black woman now.
	This kind of rhetoric on both sides is part of the absurdity of this election.
	One of the most absurd things I've ever seen in my life.
	Anyway, what he said was, Americans in 2024 are in the process of carrying out the second American revolution to take power back from the elites and despotic bureaucrats.
	These patriots are committed to peaceful revolution at the ballot box, he said.
	He warned the left may not allow a peaceful transfer of power.
	That's not nearly as bad as the stuff that Bannon himself has said, or Jack Basobie, or Trump.
	Heritage repeated the bloodless comment in a separate post on X alongside a compilation video of Democrats, commentators, and public figures making controversial comments about unrest and protests.
	You see, both the left and the right won a bloody revolution.
	This is one of the reasons why I cover politics, not because I care who is the occupant of the White House.
	That's just a puppet for you to get all excited about.
	I care because the people who really think it's going to make a difference Are so excited that they're willing to have a bloody revolution to support this New York Democrat pedophile Jeffrey Epstein guy who has promoted the transgender stuff before anybody else did.
	And every issue, every issue.
	He is not conservative. The guy who did gun control by executive order.
	The guy who enacted the medical martial law that we'd always said was coming through a declaration of emergency.
	Guess who did it? It was their conservative guy.
	And he had people like Alex Jones say, oh, it's fine.
	It's fine. Trust it.
	It's Trump. Roberts made his original comment Tuesday on Dannon's War Room podcast.
	He said the left has taken over our institutions.
	The reason that they are apoplectic right now, the reason so many anchors on MSNBC, for example, are losing their minds daily is because our side is winning.
	Oh, there you go. Are we?
	Are we really? What does it mean to win?
	You're a think tank, you're a policy organization.
	Tell us, please, what were these policies that Trump put in place that are winning for conservatives?
	How about adding, you know, $6 trillion to the deficit in one year?
	Is that a conservative policy?
	I had David Stockman on to talk about how Trump was killing the economy.
	And he was killing the economy even before he did that.
	But he set that up as a new precedent that was eagerly followed by Biden, just as Biden followed his precedent to do gun control by executive order, to do the COVID lockdowns and medical martial law by executive order.
	He followed all that stuff. Trump broke all of that.
	He set the precedent.
	He said, so we're in the process of the second American revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.
	And so now Trump has gone full disavow, just like he did with WikiLeaks.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti-social media?
	It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great escape to TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links.
	Live stream the show at DLive and every Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.
	Eastern. Videos at Bitchute and Ugetube.
	New audio podcast, The Real David Knight Show, at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart, and more.
	But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel, without your support, the show will run out of gas.
	The links to support this show are at TheDavidKnightShow.com to donate via Subscribestar, donate via *, or donate via *, Cash App, Bitcoin, or P.O. Box.
	Our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with us to get this fall.
	Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family.
	All right, and we've got to get a new version of that.
	We've got so many different beeps. Those beeps are places where they have shut us down.
	We can no longer support the program or hear the program.
	But, by the way, that reminded me.
	I've not responded yet to the individual who sent this, I don't think.
	But I just wanted to mention I had a listener who has supported us for a long time from Australia on Subscribestar.
	And he said, I hear you saying that you can listen to the program if you're a Subscribestar supporter without any commercials.
	How do I do that?
	And I apologize.
	We need to tell everybody.
	If you are a subscriber on Subscribestar, what we do is every day we post the video as well.
	We post links to the video as well as to the audio without any commercials.
	And so...
	The podcast is without commercials.
	I think Rumble puts commercials in, don't they, Travis?
	And I think they add some commercials.
	We don't have any control over that.
	I don't think there's commercials on BitChute.
	And then we give you a podcast version that does not have commercials.
	That's available for subscribers.
	You have to go to the channel where you subscribed.
	And I looked at it and I thought, yeah, I guess a lot of people don't do that because I have people occasionally tell me, you know, my credit card hasn't been operating.
	I thought I was supporting you on Subscribestar, but it hasn't been operating for a year now, you know, something like that.
	And so just go to Subscribestar, go to my page, and if you're a subscriber, there'll be a link along with the description.
	The show that is there for Subscribestar people to listen without commercials.
	So thank you for your support.
	I appreciate that. Let's talk a little bit about the vaccines.
	And this was something that just made my jaw drop.
	On the Hill, they had an article that said, Wow.
	Wow. Last month, this is just the most amazing article I think I've read anywhere.
	Where is this person?
	Who does this person work for, by the way?
	Let's go to the end of the article here and see.
	This is Glenn Altshuler.
	An emeritus professor of American Studies at Cornell University.
	Oh, wow. An award-winning producer.
	She sees nothing at all wrong with what she did.
	Well, it takes a lot of education to become this stupid.
	Exactly. Exactly.
	Now you're starting to sound like Mark Twain.
	So, this is what he has to say.
	Last month, Republican members of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic blasted Dr.
	Anthony Fauci, I guess we should call him F-U-Auchy, that would probably be a better name for him, for his support of mask and vaccine mandates, for his support of lockdowns, and for his support of school closures.
	Yeah, all these things that tanked the economy, hurt people, and didn't work.
	Crazy. That's right.
	But not for this person.
	Not for this emeritus professor at Cornell.
	He said they alleged, they alleged that Fauci had covered up government funding of research lab in Wuhan, China.
	Look, there's no allegation about any of that stuff.
	Use the right words.
	He hasn't been convicted in a court of this, but everybody besides this professor knows what the truth is.
	I just found it absolutely stunning that somebody would have the audacity to put this kind of a lie, an absurd lie, into print.
	And that the hell would publish it.
	And he quotes Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	He said, Mr. Fauci belongs in prison.
	He should be tried for mass murder and crimes against humanity.
	I absolutely agree. I've said that many times.
	Unfortunately, she also then followed that up, calling him an a-hole and a liar, which undermines her initial criticism, I believe, in most people's minds.
	Peter Navarro.
	Said Fauci, quote, has been wrong about everything.
	So was Peter Navarro.
	Peter Navarro was the one who was bragging about getting ventilators out, and it killed about 90% of the people they put them on.
	He said Fauci's been wrong about everything, especially the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in treating COVID. Then, this guy says, USA Today soon acknowledged Navarro's claims did not meet its fact-checking standards.
	USA Today does not meet my fact-checking standards.
	I've looked at that, and it's not as effective as ivermectin, but it is effective.
	Hydroxychloroquine and zinc are very effective.
	And we had a study that came out of France at that time in 2020.
	Showing how nation after nation, they went through Europe, they went through Asia, they went through Africa, they went through North America, Europe, all these different regions, country after country after country.
	And they said, okay, nobody was dying, and then they bring in the, and then, you know, at some point, they start getting some cases, and then they bring in ivermectin, and it goes down to zero.
	Then they bring in the vaccine, and it goes way up above where it ever was before.
	In November 2020, this person writing on the Hill says, Steve Bannon proposed that Fauci and FBI Director Christopher Wray should be beheaded.
	I'd put their heads on pikes as a warning to federal bureaucrats.
	See, that's the Steve Bannon I know.
	The reckless, loose cannon throwing stuff out there that discredits him and anybody who follows him.
	But again, Project 2025, oh, I don't want to have anything to do with them, because they're talking about a bloodless revolution.
	Evidently, Trump wants a bloody revolution like Bannon and Posobiec and Jones are putting out there.
	In 2021, a Maryland man named Thomas Patrick Connolly, using an anonymous encrypted account, sent emails vowing to make Fauci, quote, pay with your children's blood for your crimes, unquote.
	Notice that it was encrypted and anonymous, and they still caught him.
	This will let you know that nothing is secure on the Internet.
	Not your cryptocurrency, not your anonymous encrypted emails, nothing.
	And it's going to become even less secure as they roll out quantum computing.
	And guess what? When they roll out quantum computing, the U.S. government isn't going to tell you for quite some time that they've got it.
	Anyway, and to drag Fauci into the street to break every bone in his body with crowbars and sledgehammers and set him on fire.
	Now, we can all appreciate the sentiment, but he got a three-year sentence for that.
	The demonization of Fauci strongly suggests that partisan polarization, contempt for expertise, contempt for expertise?
	Are you kidding me?
	What expertise has he shown?
	And his highly effective mask, or his highly effective vaccines, or his highly effective six-foot distance in lockdown?
	None of it was effective.
	None of it was science.
	It was all tyranny.
	The coarseness, the cruelty, and the cultish propensity for conspiracy theories, says this guy.
	Well, they never addressed the tyranny.
	They never addressed the deaths that his policies caused.
	You know, I was talking earlier about, well, how do we fix Obamacare?
	Well, one of the things is to publish the results and the records of individual doctors and hospitals to let you know who is a Fauci and who's a real doctor.
	But we don't have any of that.
	Can't have that data.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	Gotta hide that. Judged by any reasonable criteria, says this person, Fauci was an exemplary public servant.
	Yes, so good, as a matter of fact, that we paid him more than twice the legal limit.
	And then gave him royalties, an undetermined amount, since they won't release that.
	They are not following those rules that require them to release the royalties that they got.
	You know, Fauci's salary, and everyone in the bureaucracy is supposed to have their salaries capped at the salary of the vice president.
	And Fauci's boss and his boss's boss, their salaries were capped at just over $200,000.
	Fauci, however, was making more than the President of the United States, more than $400,000.
	Exemplary indeed.
	He was the chief explainer to the American people about the preventative measures, vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics.
	He gave immunity to the pharmaceutical companies.
	He gave them a license to kill.
	A license to steal.
	A license to lie.
	Interestingly enough, the same description that Jesus gives of Satan himself.
	Come to steal, to kill, and to destroy.
	Voter registration records confirm.
	Fauci's not affiliated with either Democrat or Republican Party.
	Why would he? He's equally comfortable with both a Trump and a Biden, with both Republicans in control of Congress and Democrats.
	Republicans may occasionally give him a tongue lashing, but they keep shoveling the money for years to him.
	It was Republicans. It was Ronald Reagan who gave the pharmaceutical companies legal immunity.
	And it was Trump who pushed that in.
	So yeah, he's an example of the bipartisan bureaucracy that stays there forever.
	Fauci should be lionized, he says.
	Lionized. Throw him to the lions, I say.
	For his outstanding contributions to public health.
	Not demonized.
	And yet, interestingly, as this guy says he should be lionized...
	We have an actor, Mike Heslin, who dies.
	He's an actor in some kind of a play or a movie.
	I don't know which one it is. It was called Lioness.
	So you want Lion Eyes Fauci?
	How about the actor who was in this?
	At 30 years old, he died of an unexpected cardiac event.
	Cardiac event. Yeah.
	Prince's wrong thing.
	Says the greatest cause of human suffering and death is the government.
	Organized crime. I'm done with BS. Either the people wake up or we sink with a ship of fools.
	Yeah. How do I get off of this ship?
	It's kind of crazy. And so, with all that said...
	I got an email today from someone who said, look at what Michael Yan just posted.
	Evidently, he had made some statements about the sugar water vaccine thing that I've played for you many times from Alex Jones.
	And so he put something of a retraction up, saying, well, you know, Alex Jones, call me in person.
	And explain to me that this was taken out of context.
	So let me play it for you, because I'll play you a longer clip than I usually play.
	Now, this one does not have the additional commercial that Alex had done about Bill Gates and about the wonderful Trump vaccine.
	So he did a commercial, and then this is a longer clip of what he had to say about the sugar water so that you can see it in context.
	And then, of course...
	None of these clips are what he said right next to me as we had less than 30 seconds and the music was playing to go out and Alex kind of sandbagged me as the program was ending.
	And he said, yeah, there's nothing.
	We've got to get the good vaccine from Trump.
	I was like, what is he talking about?
	But I'd had somebody who had already told me that he was pushing the idea that Trump had a different vaccine, that it was a good vaccine.
	But here is a longer clip.
	So that you can get some context.
	Trump takes control from Gates of the vaccine process.
	He's then able to get cleaner, weaker vaccines for those that want it.
	He's then able to keep the economy going and try to break COVID hysteria.
	A stronger, weaker MRNA. And the frauds back before the election, which he's now doing through the CDC. He's taking control of.
	So thank God he's contradicting Redfield.
	Thank God he's contradicting Fauci.
	He didn't fire him. He didn't fire him.
	So Trump's doing everything real behind the scenes and out in the open, but by taking the wind out of the face, we've got Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, saying, I would not trust anything he says.
	Do not take a vaccine from Trump.
	And now because Trump's in control of the CDC, he's getting control.
	Gates goes, trust my vaccine, but don't trust the CDC's vaccine.
	Did he say that?
	Are you making that up, Alex?
	Attenuated classic viruses.
	That's not a classic virus.
	There's a very low amount of adjuvant in it.
	You lying piece of filth.
	And what is adjuvant? It makes your body have an autoimmune response.
	Because a lot of times if a vaccine's weak, which again doesn't hurt you as bad, you're not going to have the autoimmune response.
	You're not going to form antibodies. So they've got to give you The squalene or the mercury or the aluminum to trigger that.
	And so, yeah, Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks.
	Can we take a little bit of an attenuated microwave or radiated COVID deal?
	Absolutely. You know, you're lying.
	It's already everywhere anyways.
	You know, you're lying. Look, first of all, Alex pretended.
	That the vaccine, that the virus had been isolated.
	It was never isolated.
	Alex and everybody knew.
	Because Trump had had a little program.
	We went around the table and they said, no, we'll do it with mRNA.
	We've been talking about that for months.
	And so, it's not a classic virus, dead or weakened pathogen.
	Not at all. And even if it were sugar water, Alex had spent decades talking about how mercury and aluminum and things like that that they put in, how that was giving people autism and many immune system things.
	He talked about that for years.
	For years, he had talked about the annual flu scam and how they tried to scare people into getting a flu exam.
	Every bit of that was a lie.
	I'm surprised that Michael Jan fell for it.
	I commented to him and I said to Michael Jan, I put this up on my Twitter channel.
	I said, so, what is more?
	And he came back and said, well, I wasn't really coming after Alex.
	I was coming after Ben Shapiro and other people for telling people, you know, go ahead and take the vaccine.
	I said, so, what is more pathetic?
	Ben Shapiro and other people telling you to get an untested vaccine because science?
	Or is it more pathetic that Alex Jones tells you to get the untested vaccine because Trump?
	Which one of those is more pathetic?
	Seriously. As a matter of fact, a comedian, I think, laid it out.
	Sorry, wrong one.
	He's been able to get cleaner, weaker vaccines.
	Hang on, I got that clip in there twice.
	Can you play the Trump juice clip?
	Do you have that? The one that you were getting rid of?
	The curse word that was in it, you beeped out?
	That's in there twice. Anyway, Trump, give him the credit that he wants, Alex.
	Oh, that's not playing either.
	Okay, we got some problems.
	So he said, well, the problem is the context.
	And I said, well, here's the context, Michael.
	I worked for Alex. I didn't believe it at first when people contacted me and told me that he was telling people that Trump had a safe vaccine.
	And then he did it with me sitting right next to him.
	And then I told people that and they called me a liar for years.
	Called me a liar for years.
	And so somebody sent me this.
	And so what he's saying is, well, I got a disgruntled employee.
	I said, well, it's not me. Somebody sent me that sugar water clip.
	I was glad to have it. But, you know, even though you put that up, you still get people who follow Trump, people who love Alex.
	They don't want to believe their eyes. They don't want to believe their ears.
	They hate me for telling them the truth.
	And I'm going to keep telling you the truth, so keep hating me.
	I'm not going to let this stuff go.
	I said Alex knew it was mRNA, and he knew that it was unlike any other jab.
	It was not a weakened pathogen.
	He pretended that COVID had been isolated, that it had been ramped up with gain-of-function so he could sell prepper items.
	Alex also knew that the adjuvant said, we're saying, that's not a problem, it's just got some mercury stuff in there.
	He said, that's not a problem.
	Well, he knew that was a problem.
	And he also knew that there was no secret alternative vaccine being developed.
	Nobody said that. He made that garbage up, just like he and Steve Pachenik sold everybody the fact that there was some secret sting, you know, a few months later, around the election, two days after the election.
	He makes up the idea that there's some secret sting and there's some undercover global war that's going on with white hats and black hats, that they had 20,000 National Guard out there arresting people.
	He made all of that stuff up so he could start his next grift, Stop the Steal.
	Two of Alex's biggest grifts in one year.
	Disgusting. People's lives were destroyed.
	Many of them have died.
	Suicide. Because of this January the 6th stuff.
	Alex knew there was no secret alternative.
	He knew that there was no secret stuff anywhere with that.
	And as a matter of fact, a comedian, we've got this fixed.
	Thanks, Travis.
	Trump made the vaccine. If you loved Trump, you would have got the **** thing.
	That was his baby, right?
	Warp speed. Excuse me, warp speed.
	No. You all have warp speed in you right now.
	You have Trump juice inside your body.
	Warp speed so quick, it was supposed to take five years, but I made it in two days.
	Warp speed. You have experimental Trump juice in your body, floating around.
	Warp speed. Nobody makes you country.
	Nobody feels tiny when they go.
	Big. Very big.
	If I like Trump, I'd be like, give me that Patriot pinch.
	Give it to me. Come on. I've got my NRA tattoo and my mRNA tattoo.
	Come on. I can act to him straight again.
	There's an RA tattoo and there's mRNA tattoo.
	Does Alex have an mRNA tattoo on the other side as well?
	And look, I guess in a certain way I'm the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it.
	I pushed the FDA like they have never been pushed before.
	I wouldn't exactly say they're in love with me.
	The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind.
	All of the countries of the world who are now getting the vaccine or soon will be getting it.
	Yeah, yeah. Yeah, father of the vaccine?
	Or the father of lies?
	Who's come to steal?
	Who's come to lie?
	Who's come to destroy? Which is it?
	Which one is he?
	And who are we talking about, these people who are covering for them, right?
	What team are they playing on?
	Well, we've got the so-called second gentleman, Doug Emhoff.
	I guess they're married to Lala Harris.
	He tested positive for COVID. Imagine that.
	I wonder how many boosters he has had.
	And maybe it's the boosters that they're testing.
	I don't know how many he's had.
	But let's end this segment with some positive news.
	And there is, we keep seeing news about things like natokinase and other things that help with the blood clots that are a big issue.
	This is a new one that I had not seen before.
	Ginkgo biloba, if I'm pronouncing that correctly.
	I know I have a hard time saying that.
	But anyway, it's also known as maidenhair tree, native to China, Japan, Korea.
	Now grown into Europe and the United States, the leaves and the seeds from the tree have been used for thousands of years in traditional Chinese medicine and are still used today in supplements and herbal remedies.
	And primarily they've used it in the past to help people improve their memory and their cognitive function.
	I might send some of these things to Biden, as well as to alleviate symptoms of anxiety, glaucoma, and dementia.
	It's believed to improve blood flow to the brain and may help ease circulation problems.
	Some studies have suggested that it may also help with memory problems caused by dementia or Alzheimer's disease.
	However, another possible benefit of ginkgo biloba is the fibrinolytic effects.
	In other words, it prevents blood clots from growing.
	And it may ameliorate the microclots and subsequent fibrosis caused by the COVID spike protein, which COVID vaccines induce in the body, induce the body to manufacture after injection.
	So I don't sell this stuff.
	I'm not giving you medical advice.
	I know that some things like nanokinase, and there's another one that was from China.
	It was an active ingredient they extracted from ground-up, a particular earthworm they had in China that they use as an anticoagulant.
	And so there's some of these things that are out there, and people have been taking some of these for years.
	In theory, to say, well, maybe this will help because blood clots are such an issue with these Trump shots.
	I think time will have to tell whether or not that's effective, but at least this is something that you can try.
	If you listen to some loudmouth grifter tell you that it was sugar water, you might want to try some of these other things in your desperation.
	We're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back
	Music playing
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back, and we've got some good news about cars.
	Yes, the people who are trying to take everything from us, including our transportation, are continuing along with their plan.
	But other people have other plans as well.
	Even though they have laid these things out for a long period of time, even though they have practiced them, the ability of people to improvise and to overcome is something to be seen.
	And of course, God has the final say in what these people are doing.
	I'm always encouraged to see Yuval Harari speak.
	As he shakes his fist against God, I can almost hear God laughing.
	I can hear him laughing in his word at people who are like that.
	On Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip, writes, I'm not sure exactly what this Project 2025 is.
	What we want is reform and justice, not vengeance.
	We all know how the Patriot Act came about and who it was used against.
	Yeah, it was used against the Patriots.
	That's right. We want to know more of these calls, these irresponsible, useless, unproductive calls for vengeance, for revenge.
	And that's coming from Trump.
	Again, a guy who is incapable of acting, as his former lawyer said, except out of his own perceived self-interest.
	We're out of revenge.
	And so yeah, we don't want that.
	But let's talk a little bit about how some people are acting to actually outmaneuver These people who are trying to take away our transportation.
	Across Europe, automatic speed limiters are coming this week.
	They start putting them in cars, and this is coming from North American House Hippo.
	Thank you for sending this to me.
	New cars are going to be fitted with automatic speed limiters across Europe beginning this week.
	Can they be turned off?
	And this is coming from a UK paper, which points out that...
	The law will not apply in the UK. Why?
	Well, because they had Brexit.
	And the establishment and the left is still so upset about Brexit.
	This is a wine press story, actually.
	But he got the information out of the UK. But, yeah, Brexit.
	They already took that exit before they got to this point.
	They took the Brexit right off of the EU Express headed towards tyranny.
	So the question is, can they be turned off?
	Or will the new labor government weaponize that?
	Because the Brits are going to be getting their cars from Europe.
	They'll come with this equipment on there.
	Well, the UK, under the Labour government, which these leftists and the Greens and the Communists, the Green Communists, the Watermelon Party, that's what they should call it.
	They have a thin veneer of green.
	On the inside, they're completely red.
	And that's what communist is, red.
	It's not MAGA. Those people just, they don't know anything.
	They don't know that throughout history the communists have used red.
	They call themselves red state this and red state that.
	It's crazy how naive they are.
	How ignorant they are of history.
	Anyway, even though the rule to install the technologies does not apply in the UK... Many of the cars will have been made in Europe and so will feature what they call the Intelligent Speed Assistance.
	Anyway, the technology allows a car to automatically restrict its speed based on GPS location, speed sign recognition, and cameras within the vehicle.
	So, again, you've seen, we've all got different apps that are maps, and it doesn't matter whether it's Waze or it's Google, and there's some other ones that I've used.
	They all know what the speed limit, they know your location, and they know what the speed limit is there.
	And so they can either throttle your car, or they can send off a message to the police and tell them to send you a ticket.
	It's just a question of when they want to try to roll out this technology and where and what people will do.
	Will people accept this or not?
	Well, we have an innovation coming from one company.
	This is actually on Breitbart.
	A new kind of, a different kind of EV. Instead of a battery EV, This is a hydrogen fuel cell, EV Semi.
	And Walmart in Canada is going to start testing these.
	And I think that's a very positive development.
	All of these new technologies, as far as I'm concerned, they've got, all of them have major technological issues that have been solved a long time ago with internal combustion engines, both gasoline and diesel.
	And there is no reason to have any of these.
	I don't believe any of this CO2 stuff.
	It's all nonsense.
	0.04% of the atmosphere, and only 3% of that 0.04% is man-made, according to these idiots.
	They've got all these false prophecies that I've seen for more than 50 years in my life.
	It's now 54 years.
	Yeah. And I've watched ClimateGate and all the rest of the stuff.
	These people run like a vampire from a crucifix whenever you ask them for their data.
	Because that's what they are.
	They're blood-sucking parasites.
	Telling us lies.
	And so I don't have any interest in any of this Climate MacGuffin.
	However... One way to defeat these people, if you can't do it in the legislature because they're all on the take, one way that you can do it is you can have some engineers out there say, okay, you want an electric vehicle?
	I can do that. And I can do it without you having range issues and without you having to sit there for hours to charge up your massive semi-trailer.
	And so Walmart has reportedly deployed its first hydrogen fuel cell-powered Nikola Trey semi-truck.
	I guess everybody is trying to steal Tesla's name.
	So they call theirs Nikola.
	Hydrogen technology stands as a potential competitor to EV trucks.
	Actually, it's not.
	It is an EV truck itself.
	It stands as a competitor to the battery model.
	And so I kind of like this because they're beating them at their own zero emissions game.
	Oh, you say you're not going to let us have anything unless it's zero emissions?
	Well, here's something that you don't control through the centralized grid.
	That's the whole purpose of the battery EV is to control it through the grid.
	And they jealously attack any other technology.
	Because they want you to have to go through.
	It's just like what they did with the vaccine.
	Oh, I'm sorry. You can't have HCQ. You can't have ivermectin.
	You can't have anything. You got to wait.
	Got to get the vaccine. Well, you got to have the battery car.
	Only the battery car will do.
	Electric reports that Walmart Canada has introduced the first hydrogen fuel cell electric semi-truck to its fleet.
	The move makes Walmart Canada the first major retail chain in North America to adopt this cutting-edge technology.
	Now, the good news is that if it's Walmart, they may start, if they're going to use this, they're going to have to roll out an infrastructure of places where you can charge it up with hydrogen.
	And if they roll that out, they might sell it to other people.
	That's the big chicken and egg thing, right?
	Which comes first? And so they're pushing out these EVs because you could charge them at home.
	You don't have any way to charge something that's a hydrogen vehicle at home.
	So you do have to have that.
	But they should be able to do that fairly easily.
	Again, it's all money and technology versus government mandates is what we're talking about.
	And... The government has put out billions of dollars and has only produced seven or eight charging stations for electric vehicles.
	Unbelievable the amount of incompetence and waste that these people can't even put something together to make their own system operate.
	The deployment of the Nikola Trey hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle is part of Walmart Canada's ambitious plans to transition to 100% alternative fuel fleet.
	It's expensive. It's unnecessary.
	But it's one way to get around their controls.
	It boasts a range of approximately 400 miles per tank.
	And the time to refuel.
	So that's about the same or maybe a little bit more from what I could tell of what semi-trucks range are.
	I don't know. I'm not a truck driver.
	I'm sure we have people who are truck drivers for the love of the road is.
	I'm sure he'll correct me with this and he'll have some more up-to-date information.
	But from what I could tell...
	It seemed to be about the same range and about the same amount of time to fill it up as it would be for a diesel truck or a gasoline truck, although they don't use gasoline.
	To pump it with literal gas instead of gasoline.
	To pump it with hydrogen gas.
	It would take about the same amount of time as to fill it with diesel.
	It takes about five minutes, they said.
	But they said, well, you know, real world, they may be skeptical a little bit about these numbers.
	From what I could tell, it seems to take about five to 15 minutes for them to fill up a large semi-trailer because I think they'd give them faster pumps.
	That they give us at the car stations.
	But again, you know, 5 to 15 minutes.
	10 minutes would be right in the center of that.
	And so it's in the same ballpark, in other words, of filling up your car with a liquid petroleum product or, you know, in the same range that you would have.
	So problem solved.
	And it would be zero emissions.
	So what are they going to complain about next?
	They will. I mean, it's just like the pronoun stuff.
	You use their pronouns, they'll find something else to jerk you around with.
	And then this story.
	This is my favorite one.
	In Philadelphia, you have a car shelter, they call it.
	They're treating the cars as if they are abused and discarded animals.
	They call it a no-kill car shelter in Philadelphia.
	Taking in broken down vehicles that were bound for the trash heap and then transforming them into ferocious road demons reminiscent of Mad Max.
	The No-Kill Shelter has recently gained a rabid following on Instagram.
	Pull it up and show people some of the pictures of some of these hybrid things that they put together.
	It kind of reminds me of Sid's toys at Toy Story, some of these things.
	Yeah, scroll down there a little bit.
	Now, that one doesn't look too bad.
	It's elevated. That one's pretty rusty.
	And, you know, I've seen a lot of rust buckets.
	At the car shows, they were having awesome.
	They had a huge one. They had a lot of what they called rat rods.
	They'd be all rusty and people didn't sand them down or paint them.
	They would just, you know, make hot rods into that type of thing.
	The No Kill Shelter has recently gained a rabid following on Instagram.
	With the revamped speed demons conquering the roads of Port Richmond and eye-catching videos that garner millions of views, the founder of Brian Smith, 42, is pleased with his shop's newfound fame.
	Thanks largely to his business partner and social media manager, but Smith said that he'd like to keep pursuing his passion even if the limelight disappears.
	It's about keeping as many of these cars going as possible.
	Out of the shop's many mean machines, the two that have garnered the most attention are what he deems to be the Nomad Max.
	It was originally a 55 Chevy Nomad.
	We saw that one. And the Seneca, a 1960 Dodge Dart, on top of a 1984 Chevy C30 Dually Dump Truck chassis.
	So, kind of interesting.
	Both these cars were destined for the scrapyard, but their motto is, keep old iron alive.
	And there was no way they could let him die.
	The crew also works on vintage cars, like a 1959 Cadillac sedan DeVille, which Smith is happy to sell for $10,000 to anybody who is interested.
	The two were inspired to start what they called a, as a car club, they called it the Deadbeaters Car Club.
	Several of their friends, they jokingly called it a drinking club with a car problem.
	The deadbeaters were bound together by the love of old beat-up cars that didn't have shiny paint jobs.
	It's exactly the opposite of what Obama started with his cash for clunkers.
	And I said when he did it, I was not on the air at the time, but I said to everybody, I said, this is They want to get rid of transportation.
	They made it clear at that point.
	I mean, they've been talking about getting rid of cars going back to before the first Earth Day in 1970.
	We got to get rid of cars.
	Cars are the worst thing that ever happened.
	You know, they got the guy who is the CEO for Lyft.
	He was an urban planner.
	He said the best invention of mankind was the city and the worst invention was the automobile.
	I was like, no. The automobile allowed people to escape the city, which was the worst invention.
	What this guy loves is an urban planner.
	And they took that ticket right away.
	That's why we had the suburbs.
	Everybody voted in opposition to this guy is what the best and worst inventions were.
	But they've always wanted to stop that.
	These urban planners have always talked about urban sprawl as if we're supposed to all be in cities.
	And if we're in the suburbs or in the rural areas, oh, that's just sprawl.
	We've got to stop that sprawl.
	Got to concentrate everybody.
	Control everybody's lives.
	That has always been there.
	Getting rid of cars has always been there.
	So when Obama put through the cash for clunkers, I said, watch out.
	He's just trying to get rid of spare parts.
	He's trying to get rid of the automobiles that could be easily fixed.
	But this is the future.
	We're going to have to learn how to fix these cars and keep them going, and who cares what they look like, quite frankly.
	Rockfin, thank you very much, Eric.
	I appreciate the tip. And on Rumble, NeuroDivergent1 says, David, could you and Travis put links for these clips in the rebroadcast or in the comments, please?
	Links for the clips.
	Does he mean the video clips, I guess?
	Yeah. Okay. All right.
	Yeah, I'll take a look at it.
	I run through this stuff pretty quickly.
	Most of these things I pulled off of Twitter.
	So, you know, you can look on Twitter and you can, or they're in the articles.
	So they're either in the articles or on Twitter or both.
	And so if you look up some of this stuff, you can find it.
	I don't know. I've had that clip about the comedian and the Trump juice for so long.
	I don't know where I got that from.
	I played that first time years ago.
	But the other ones are all recent clips that are everywhere.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, we're going to talk about the Second Amendment, which is now under attack.
	And it's very interesting because the Mises Institute, which is not a radical organization, just like Heritage Foundation is not a radical organization.
	But the headline from the Mises Institute says, the ATF is out there killing people again.
	And they're absolutely right.
	It's not sensationalism.
	I'll be right back.
	I'm sorry, I can't do it.
	I'm sorry.
	that's that's me on what way me the
	[(Menacing, Slender Forms)]
	MUSIC
	MUSIC Making Sense.
	It's common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	You know, while we're at the break, I saw that, and I thought, well, here's one way that you can do it.
	I see this a lot of times.
	There'll be a large video speech somebody's giving that's an hour long or something like that.
	And they'll give people a time code as to where the clip starts.
	So you could do that. You could give them the clip and tell them about where it starts.
	And I do, on a regular basis, we put up...
	First we put up the show before we've got the full description.
	And then I do a description and it says, you know, about how many minutes in we start talking about this other topic.
	That type of thing. So that kind of gets you in the ballpark, since it's such a long program.
	And so people can see what is being discussed at different parts of the program.
	And they can jump to that content if they're not interested in something that I'm talking to.
	They can go to the next thing. And so if you look at that, that'll kind of give you an idea of roughly where it is.
	And, you know, you can find it within there.
	But I apologize. It takes us a while to do that.
	So what I've been doing is I've been putting it up With no description saying the description's coming.
	And then we get the description done, the transcription done, and we go through and find the time codes two or three hours later.
	I put up that.
	And I don't know if that gets pumped out then again with the different podcasts, if the podcasts, if they get the update to that or not.
	If you don't get the update to that.
	Then you can go directly to where it is hosted and you can find it there at that point in time when you listen to it.
	Usually it takes us about three or four hours to get those up.
	Let's talk about the Second Amendment.
	And we have the public health official that Biden has put in, Vivek Murthy, who said that gun owners are a disease.
	Well, that's funny because I think that government, especially the unconstitutional public health bureaucrats like Murthy, I think their disease has killed far more people in 2020 than all of the gunshots over the entire history of America.
	And I would include the wars as well.
	The outright wars, the civil war, foreign wars, everything else.
	You people, Murthy, you and the Trump administration, you and the Biden administration and the Trump administration have killed more people with your drugs.
	How dare you try to take away our God-given right to defend ourselves?
	Until 1996, this is from American Thinker, One of the primary tactics of anti-liberty gun activists was to treat criminal misuse of guns as well as accidents and suicides as a public health matter.
	And so they're going to come after it.
	As a public health emergency.
	And you've heard this rhetoric over and over again.
	He said, Fortunately, in 1996, this language was inserted into a budget bill.
	Quote, Well, there you go.
	So this guy is a Surgeon General under Biden.
	You know, Congress can restrict money if they want to.
	They could restrict money for a lot of this transgender grooming stuff.
	They could have restricted money for what Trump was incentivizing, even, in 2020.
	The lockdowns, the masks, the social distancing, the vaccines.
	They always have the power of the purse, but they refuse to use it.
	Which is a form of consent for what is being done.
	It is certainly consent when Trump provides the funds, just as it is consent when Congress refuses to stop the funding of these activities.
	I'm sick and tired of Jim Jordan and his dog and pony shows, and he never does anything, and nobody ever does anything.
	Mike Johnson, fully on board with these people.
	As a matter of fact, they could replace...
	Lala Harris and Biden with a number three in line, Mike Johnson, and nobody would ever notice.
	Be the same policies, folks.
	Same policies.
	So that simple sentence, and none of these funds are going to be used to promote gun control by the CDC. Drove supposed medical scientists obsessed with gun control, drove them underground.
	They still did anti-gun advocacy and quote-unquote research using public funds.
	They were just quiet about it.
	They funneled money and research through NGOs and other anti-gun groups.
	An NPR article talked about how for more than a quarter of a century, they've done all they can to circumvent the law.
	and now this Surgeon General so-called issues an advisory on the public health crisis of firearm violence in the United States. Today US Surgeon General Dr.
	Vivek Murthy released a landmark Surgeon General's advisory on firearm violence declaring firearm violence in America to be a public health crisis. You are a public health crisis Murthy.
	Why do we have these people?
	And again, the guy that Trump had as his Surgeon General, he was an underling of Mike Pence, and he was one of the most rabid liars in Operation Warp Speed and the rest of the stuff.
	Just disgusting what he was pushing.
	Firearm violence is pervasive, he said.
	More than half, 54%, of U.S. adults or their family members having experienced a firearm-related incident in their lives.
	Do you believe that?
	There's absolutely no way that that's true.
	Absolutely no way that is true.
	These people always do this kind of stuff.
	I saw them doing it at the EPA in Research Triangle Park in North Carolina, where I lived and had worked.
	I saw them telling people, we got more people dying of fine particulate matter than we do of cancer and heart disease.
	And I'm not talking, Congressman, about people getting sick.
	I'm saying they're dying.
	And more people are dying from this stuff that we want to ban now.
	So they could ban diesel fuel.
	And so they could ban fireplaces.
	So they could ban barbecue grills.
	So they could ban restaurants cooking in a grill type of situation.
	There's more people dying from this stuff than from heart disease and cancer.
	And it was a total lie.
	It was an absurd lie.
	This is an absurd lie. Do you think, I mean, if it's 54%, that means that you probably know several families, several families, where people have been killed with firearms.
	That's just nonsense.
	Absolute nonsense. It's not like cancer and heart attack at all.
	That 54% figure was derived from a telephone poll of 1,271 English speakers and 73 Spanish speakers.
	Those doing the polling claim that it is a nationally representative sample, but they published nothing on the geographical distribution of the poll.
	Was this in like a bad neighborhood in Chicago, for example?
	Could be. Could be.
	Look, and to quote Mark Twain, there's lies, there's damn lies, and then there's polls.
	That's not what he said, but that is essentially what we're looking at here.
	You can get a poll to say anything that you want.
	And it's absolute nonsense.
	But this is the article I was talking about earlier from the Mises Institute.
	The ATF has resumed openly murdering Americans.
	And this is not a clickbait headline.
	This is real. And they talk about the fact that we had Ruby Ridge in 92, then we had Waco in 1993.
	You know, it's kind of interesting we talk about those.
	Conservatives will get really upset, and rightfully so, about the Clinton administration, about Janet Reno, and about Waco.
	And there were more people that were killed at Waco than at Ruby Ridge.
	But it was the same bureaucracy.
	They were operating under two different presidents.
	At Ruby Ridge, the ATF was operating under George H.W. Bush, George I., And then the same people pulled off this thing at Waco under Clinton and Janet Reno.
	And the conservatives, most conservatives, didn't really talk about Ruby Ridge much.
	They basically just talked about Waco and Janet Reno and all the rest of this stuff.
	Again, this kind of blindness, partisan blindness, has been around for a very long time.
	The Mises Institute says, later as they cooled their trigger fingers, the ATF's side gig of deliberately allowing guns to flow into Mexico for quote-unquote tracking purposes was exposed in the Fast and Furious scandal after two of these guns turned up near the scene of the killing of Brian Terry, a Border Patrol officer, in 2010.
	I put in parentheses, a whole lot of good this tracking did, huh?
	That's right. By the way, it was called Fast and Furious under Obama.
	Under George II, under George W. Bush, it was called the Gunwalker Program.
	Again, you know, just like George H.W. Bush has Ruby Ridge and the same people under Clinton run Waco.
	Under George W. Bush, they had the Gun Walker program, and then it became the Fast and Furious program.
	You know, that happened in 2010, and I recall, I think it was either 2011 or 2012.
	It was right after it was...
	This is all set up as the reason they did this.
	And the New York Times even said it was a false flag attack to try to push through the UN arms trade treaty.
	The UN said, we got all these small arms that are going across the borders and we got to stop it.
	You know, we're not too worried about...
	Hundreds of billions of dollars in big bombs and other things like that going to Ukraine and to Israel.
	No, we've got to worry about the firearms going across the U.S. and Mexico border.
	And in order to control those, we've got to mark and identify every single gun and every bit of ammunition.
	That's what they were trying to make the case for.
	So they did a false flag attack.
	That was the purpose of it, except it blew up and they got a federal agent killed.
	So then at that point, they cared about it.
	And because that blew up in their face, and they were going to have a vote on the UN Arms Trade Treaty, I think it was in 2012.
	I think it was in spring of 2012.
	My family and I were up there doing video for the National Association of Gun Rights as they were doing interviews with gun manufacturers and stuff to try to stop this UN Arms Trade Treaty thing.
	And the week before, exactly one week before they were to have the vote, you had that very, very, very, very suspicious Aurora Colorado shooting where the guy is like in a trance.
	You know, he's a psychology student.
	And he was, you know, he'd gotten the money for his grant at a national competition.
	He was a pretty sharp guy at one point in time.
	But then when they got to him, he was like this zoned out weirdo.
	And he's warning them that his apartment is booby-trapped and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's like, how did he turn into that?
	But one week before the U.N. arms trade treaty, in order to try to get people to forget about the fast and furious death of the Border Patrol agent, they ran this shooting through.
	I'm absolutely convinced of that.
	The timing of it was just amazing.
	But they still lost.
	They still lost. And so they keep coming in different ways.
	Going back to the Mises Institute article, in more recent years, ATS' favorite pastime has been to send several carloads worth of thugs LARPing with full tactical gear to raid and intimidate American licensed gun dealers for supposed infractions of federal firearms.
	and to confiscate their property.
	Jim Skelton had his business raided in 2021 after a federal entrapping weasel lied on the federal background check forms and successfully purchased several firearms.
	A whole lot of good this background check did, right?
	So, you know, they run the background check, they get an okay, but because the guy lied on his form, they come after the guy who had him fill out the form, the guy who ran the background check.
	They still come after him, he's still responsible.
	Sounds like we're playing by IRS rules here, doesn't it?
	Russell Fincher was raided at his home in 2023.
	One of the reasons being that he sold firearms without a federal firearms license, even though he had one.
	He was yelled at, he was threatened, and he was ultimately intimidated into giving up his license.
	However, lately the ATF has been reminiscing about the good old days.
	Just a couple of months ago, they raided the home of Brian Malinowski, shot and killed him.
	Malinowski, executive director of the Clinton National Airport in Little Rock, was an avid gun collector and would frequent gun shows to buy and sell firearms with other private individuals.
	Now, the Mises Institute is maybe too polite to say it.
	And maybe he doesn't want to get labeled a conspiracy theorist.
	I don't care. What I'll say is if somebody is an executive director at the Clinton National Airport in Little Rock, maybe the reason he got shot was not because of some firearm violation, because there was no firearm violation here.
	They might have been trying to hide something else.
	Running drugs through that area.
	Anyway, but he was an avid gun collector.
	He would frequent gun shows to buy and sell firearms with other private individuals.
	All of that's completely legal, and it does not require a federal firearms license.
	His frequent buying and selling of guns, however, prompted the ATF to consider him as, quote, engaging in the business of selling firearms, unquote, and therefore violating a federal law by not having an FFL. Nobody knows what the actual threshold is.
	How many guns do you need to buy or sell before you need to have that FFL? Well, we don't know.
	I guess if they told you, they'd have to kill you.
	They thus obtained a search warrant and proceeded to serve it in the most dangerous way possible.
	Even though they knew his workplace, his work schedule, his phone number.
	Oh, this is very much like Waco, right?
	They knew David Koresh's...
	Work schedule. As a matter of fact, the sheriff that was there, he had been involved in other allegations and trials.
	He'd served warrants to him.
	He'd shown up. He'd gone to these trials.
	A lot of the stuff that the ATF was talking about, he'd stood trial for it.
	They found him not guilty and things like that.
	Well, they didn't accord him that.
	Instead, what they did was they came in like gangbusters, like they did with this guy, even though they knew that they could have served him these papers anywhere.
	They decided they would do it Waco style.
	They showed up at his house completely unannounced an hour before sunrise.
	They covered up the doorbell camera.
	They cut their electricity.
	Then they loudly banged on his door before breaking it down while Malinowski and his wife were asleep.
	The ATF deliberately created a situation in which any reasonable person would assume that his home was being invaded by a gang of violent thugs, which in this case was true, except these violent thugs had badges.
	Thank you.
	Badges? We ain't got no stinking badges.
	He would be legally and morally justified in taking appropriate self-defense measures by shooting the intruders, which he did.
	One ATF agent was hit, but the gang, of which there was roughly ten carloads, ten carloads of agents, They all returned fire, hitting him in the head.
	Naturally, they confiscated a bunch of his property afterward.
	Representative Dan Goldman, Democrat of New York, expressed his anger that Republicans would criticize the ATF over this because, he said, they retaliated with deadly force after someone shot an ATF agent, who, by the way, at the time was a violent intruder.
	These no-knock raids.
	Again, this is a nightmare that has been unleashed on us.
	That was anticipated only in satire by Monty Python in Brazil before they unleashed this stuff as regular standard procedure.
	Representative Debbie Schultz, a Democrat from Florida, remarked there are far too many loopholes in buying a gun.
	And then later said, isn't it true that clerical errors can often be serious problems that cause guns to fall into criminal hands?
	How do you explain the ATF having guns then?
	You don't vet these people?
	How about training them? Later, in a separate hearing with the ATF director, Stephen Dettelbach, Jim Jordan, Jim Jordan, you can always count on Jim Jordan to give him a good tongue-lashing, and nothing else, nothing else from Jim Jordan.
	He put Dettelbach's feet to the proverbial fire by questioning him about the policy of federal officers while executing search warrants to have body cameras on, which were distinctly missing.
	And the Malinowski murder.
	But of course, Jordan and Congress continue to fund the ATF. Nobody will have any consequences for this.
	Nobody will have any consequences for breaking into an American's home and murdering him.
	And they won't have their budget cut either.
	Nothing will be done.
	Thank you, Jim Jordan.
	You're such a good example of the useless GOP, if ever there was one.
	And so what are people doing in response to this?
	Well, there was an interesting article on the Daily Mail about Christian warrior training.
	That's what they call it. And a lot of churches are looking at this and saying, well, we need to do something to protect our own people.
	They call it sheepdog training in many cases.
	And there's actually a company called Sheepdog Church Security.
	And founded by Chris Maloney in 2014, is a company that trains volunteer safety and security teams to protect houses of worship while keeping faith at the center.
	That is a very important thing.
	I've talked about this for a very long time.
	And we've had a few church shootings, and some of them were worse than others.
	Even when you've got a security team, that doesn't mean the guy can't get off one sucker shot, but it means they can't kill the whole group.
	On Rumble, Marky Mark from New Jersey, thank you for the tip.
	He said, we have over 1,000 viewers in the house.
	Well, thank you very much. Thank you for letting me know that, and thank you to all of you for watching.
	And by the way, please like the stream.
	That helps us to get the numbers up even more.
	And I just want to tell you that you can find out about the Roku channel if you'd like to watch there at some point in time.
	You can look up The David Knight Show on Roku and it should take you to that if you have a Roku device.
	But there's a lot of different places where you can find the show, and we have those links and as well as places where you can support the show at thedavidknightshow.com.
	But let's talk about this Christian warrior training thing.
	When he first founded the company back in 2014, Maloney didn't have much competition.
	But now 10 years later, church attacks are at an all-time high and the protection industry is booming.
	I covered this from a guy whose name is Charles Van Vick.
	He's from South Africa, and I've talked to him a couple of times.
	He wrote a book back in the 1990s about a mass shooting that happened there when the ANC and the communists had an open revolt with guerrillas and stuff like that.
	And he was a Christian missionary operating in Independent, and he was operating there.
	And, you know, there was a very violent time during that point in time.
	They had a lot of terrorists taking pot shots at people.
	There was a racial component to it as well.
	He thought well, you know, he struggled with the idea of whether or not he should as a Christian Protect his life and other people's lives and he thought about it. Yeah, I think that's not only a reasonable thing but it's what I need to do and so he got a pistol and he trained with it and One Sunday morning. He was visiting a liberal church in South Africa later on these guys when they had when it was all over and
	They had Nelson Mandela safely ensconced as a communist leader. They had truth and reconciliation Thanks where they said we'll give you amnesty just come forward and talk and tell us what you did. Nope. No penalties for anybody And so the people who pulled this off said at their truth and reconciliation hearing, they said, we did this because we figured this was a prosperous, liberal, white church, and we figured nobody there would be harmed.
	But they said, we ran in all kinds of opposition.
	They came in the side door throwing grenades, grenades, and then spraying the people in the church building with fully automatic gunfire.
	They immediately killed 50 to 60 people.
	And Charles Van Vick was always in the back.
	He was just visiting this church.
	He wasn't a member. He was all the way in the back.
	He had a pistol with only five bullets in it.
	So when anybody tells you, oh, well, we've got to ban all these, you know, assault weapons and all the rest of the stuff, I mean, just like that situation in the mall where you had a guy stop an individual who had, I think he had two ARs with him and a pistol and things like that, and this guy took him out with a pistol himself and saved a lot of lives.
	Anyway, Charles was in the back of the church.
	I've got to do something.
	So he pulls out his pistol, he gets down on his knee, and he takes a shot.
	And I'm not going to be able to hit anybody from this distance.
	And so he goes out the back, and he comes around the side of the building, and he sees these guys standing there, and he takes a couple more shots at them.
	And they all ran away.
	The truth and reconciliation thing...
	They said, we thought there were multiple shooters defending the place.
	And that first shot that he thought was just kind of a, no chance it's going to hit anything, that hit one of the guys.
	And as they're pulling him back, they get fire from the side, and it's all Charles.
	And he's only got five bullets.
	I did a first report I did from him about a decade ago.
	I titled it, Five Bullets to Save a Thousand People.
	Because when they talked about the truth and reconciliation thing, they said their intention was to kill every last person in that church.
	And they had the weapons and the ammunition to do it.
	They were going to go pew to pew, executing people, because nobody had the means of defense.
	Now, he wrote a book about that.
	And he wrote it in the 1990s, a couple of decades after it had happened.
	And he said, this is coming to America and you need to prepare for it.
	A lot of people didn't. A lot of people did not listen to that.
	But they're listening now.
	So Maloney, who has a background in the military and law enforcement, initially ran a safety team at his own church in Minnesota.
	Since then, he has trained over 6,000 people to protect houses of worship nationwide.
	He said, you want the church services to be open and welcoming and so forth, and yet...
	You want to provide safety and security needed.
	So those of us who do carry firearms, we do so on a concealed basis.
	We have the protection we need, yet we're not ostentatious about it.
	Very low-key, you do it concealed.
	As a matter of fact, when you look at the chart of violent incidents in churches, it has surged from 50 in 2018 to 436 in 2023.
	It's going up exponentially.
	In 2022, it was 200, and it soared up more than double.
	Wow. So, it is something that people need to do.
	He says, The practical drill and scenario training manual consists of hands-on approach to managing emergency situation from de-escalating disruptive situations to managing bomb threats and active shooter incidents.
	It also includes theoretical understanding and practical application, a holistic approach to safety training.
	And I'll just throw this in here.
	You have a responsibility to protect your life and the life of your family and perhaps people in your neighborhood as well.
	It's one of the reasons why I like to recommend to people the Civil Defense Manual by Jack Lawson.
	Go to CivilDefenseManual.com, a two-volume set.
	He only sells it as a set together.
	And he covers a wealth of things, from natural emergencies to, you know...
	Even nuclear war, if you're not in the initial blast, how do you survive once the grid is down?
	How do you survive with a cloud of fallout coming towards you?
	A lot of different things. And it's not all just from him.
	He's got a lot of contributors talking about their area of expertise in those manuals as well.
	You should always prepare. Always prepare to protect yourself and your family.
	That's the same thing that Charles Van Wick did.
	And God will use people like that, just like he used Charles.
	This guy's advertisements include an image of a handgun on top of a Holy Bible as he's billed as the protector of the people and guardian of the church.
	And so when you look at how this is escalating, he said that crimes against religious institutions, he says, fall into two categories.
	Some of these are just random crimes, but some of them are targeted attacks.
	The targeted attacks, he said, are part of a changing attitude toward churches.
	A significant decline in public respect for religious authority over the years.
	He said, when I was a teenager, churches were essentially unlocked 24-7.
	Even as a kid who was not exactly a good kid, it never occurred to me to go into a church and do something stupid like that.
	But he said, now we've got public leaders and politicians never say a thing, used to never say anything about bad against church, against Christians, but now it's very common, he said.
	I think as time has gone by, the general respect for religious authority has diminished greatly.
	Well, it's the respect for God that has diminished.
	There is no religious authority outside of God.
	So attacking a church building is no longer off limits.
	That's what it's come down to, he said.
	Family Research Council found acts of hostility against churches more than doubled.
	Between 2022 and 2023, and as I just said, and it's not just Christian churches, Jewish communities already familiar with the history of security threats and attacks have seen heightened vigilance since the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting that killed 11 people.
	He says some congregations might resist the idea of security teams fearing an over-militarized presence, you know, just like Charles Van Wick.
	Had some issues at first.
	He said some religious congregants believe Christians should be pacifists and don't believe in using weapons to protect themselves.
	He says others have very anti-gun sentiments.
	Well, here's the reality.
	You know, if somebody is going to be attacked, somebody is going to be killed...
	You don't think that you could stop it?
	That you would want to stop it?
	That you would lift a finger to help them?
	How is that, Christian? It isn't.
	It isn't. And if you're going to do something to stop it, you have to have a little bit of preparation in order to be able to do that effectively.
	One person said, can you serve God and guns?
	I don't think you can, he said.
	I think you've got to make a choice.
	He's absolutely wrong.
	You know, a lot of people say, well, money is the root of all evil.
	No, Jesus said it was the love of money that's the root of all evil.
	Jesus talked a great deal about money and about how to handle it properly, not to make it something that you worship, not to make it the God of your life, but just as money is necessary for us to know how to handle it properly in order to be able to provide for our own and to be able to help other people.
	In the same way, guns in and of themselves are not evil, just like money is not evil.
	The love of guns can be evil, just like the love of money.
	But if you don't make a god out of it, if it is, in your eyes, a means of provision and protection, then it's a good thing.
	As a matter of fact, one of the things in this article, they show a picture of a woman.
	Remember the incident? At Joel Osteen's church, a woman shows up in a trench coat, and she had a kid with her.
	She started shooting at people and all that kind of stuff, and had some off-duty police officers who were working security.
	They put her down, stopped the threat to innocent people.
	I wonder how Joel Osteen explained that to his church, since he's all about prosperity and no bad things happening to Christians.
	That's the world that we live in.
	And his Pollyanna prosperity gospel doesn't apply in the real world.
	Jesus never offered that to us, and it truly is a ridiculous thing for him to put out there.
	Well, one last thing here.
	When we talk about... Protection and responsibility.
	It turns out that the assistant police chief of the Memphis Police Department lives nearly 400 miles away from the city.
	And quite frankly, I don't blame him because Memphis is so violent and thuggish that I wouldn't want to live there either.
	Police do. Talk about an utter failure.
	A recognized utter failure.
	I'm going to live 400 miles away.
	Well, I live kind of 400 miles away from Memphis, as a matter of fact.
	His house is in Atlanta.
	And so, again, you know, Travis just...
	You trade in Memphis for Atlanta?
	I don't know. I mean, that seems like a lateral move to me, honestly.
	Exactly. Not necessarily safer, is it?
	They don't even have a giant pyramid in Atlanta.
	Yeah. Or Elon Musk yet.
	Memphis has gotten so bad in terms of crime that when Travis and his wife were recently in Texas and they were on their way back Karen was really worried about them because there was a lot of stuff on Facebook.
	I don't think she told you about this, Travis.
	Well, there's a lot of stuff on Facebook.
	People are talking about the violence in Memphis, and they're saying, don't get off the interstate.
	And the people who live there said, no, it's happening on the interstate.
	We're getting drive-by shootings on the interstate.
	And while they were having this discussion on Facebook, there was a drive-by shooting on the interstate.
	Passing through Memphis. She's going to call you and tell you, don't go through Memphis.
	Take an alternative route, but stay out of the city.
	Stay out of even the interstate passing through.
	They're going next to the pyramid.
	The Bass Pro Shop is one of the coolest things built in recent memory, and of course, you can't even go see it now.
	Yeah, yeah. Of course, they didn't build that.
	Somebody else built that. I don't know what they built it for, but that pyramid thing that's there.
	This is the sort of eccentric billionaire we need.
	I want to build a pyramid.
	Why not? Yeah, they got a great picture of the eclipse.
	Somebody set that thing up perfectly right there by that Memphis pyramid.
	On Rumble, DG8, thank you very much for the tip.
	He said, David, Jim Jordan slammed the Democrats, rightfully so, when they tried to push off a $2 trillion stimulus package in 2020.
	A week later, Trump signed it.
	Jordan never said a word.
	That's right. It was Thomas Massey who really opposed that stuff.
	And he said, I want everybody to come back and go on record voting against this.
	And they were furious. You're going to kill us all!
	Nobody died. Isn't that interesting?
	All these old guys in Washington, none of them died?
	Not from COVID, anyway.
	And so in response for that, you know, Trump's thanks to Thomas Massey for trying to protect the public from trillions of dollars.
	Trump's response was to try to primary out Thomas Massey.
	So he's survived attacks from Trump as well as most recently the ADF campaign.
	ADF? ADL. ADL. The Anti-Defamation League and APAC. I guess it was APAC, not ADL, but probably.
	They all chipped in because they wanted money for Israel.
	He didn't want to give them the money.
	It's very consistent with what he does.
	It's not anti-Semitic.
	He just doesn't like robbing taxpayers to pay Peter or Paul.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at the politics.
	I know everybody's dying to talk about Biden, and so we've got a few things here to say about Biden and what's going to be coming up, perhaps.
	Today, Congress comes back.
	We're probably going to see a lot more talk about Biden as mental competence, and we'll talk about that, and we'll talk about the upcoming presidential election in a little bit, and then we'll get back into some things that really affect your life.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪ So, I'm going to go ahead and get started. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	the
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video. I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
	Well, before we get into politics, I just want to say real quickly, I don't know what's happened to gold this morning.
	I didn't look at it, but over the weekend, it was nudging right up against $2,400 an ounce again.
	It is interesting. Why this particular change?
	Well, U.S. employment data, and again, this is...
	Curated and reported by the Department of Labor so you can take it with a grain of salt.
	They always rig these things just like they rig inflation and all these other numbers that they've got out there.
	But even with that, they couldn't put a real happy figure on it.
	So people are looking at it and saying, well, okay, that slow job growth indicates that there'll be pressure in the election year to do something to ease the economic pressure or recession or whatever.
	I don't know that's necessarily true.
	I think there will be a rate cut, but...
	It's hard to call the timing of all this stuff.
	A lot of gold investors are looking at $2,400 as the market sees fewer barriers to the Fed's easing cycle.
	Hoping that again, it's going to ease interest rates to try to stimulate the economy to try to help the incumbent.
	You think they're interested in helping the incumbent at this point in time?
	I don't know. But quite frankly, when you look at the Federal Reserve, I think they're more interested in protecting their hegemony in terms of the fiat dollar.
	They're more interested in protecting the dollars we frequently talk about with Tony than they are about protecting the economy or protecting a politician at this point.
	So who knows what's going to happen with this?
	I mean... Typically, you would think that they would do something to ease the recession, but we don't know.
	We don't know. I just look at gold as wealth insurance and also as insurance against the full-on surveillance that they're bragging about how they're going to use artificial intelligence, the CBDC, the digital ID, all the rest of this stuff.
	That's new. We've had situations in the past where things have gotten out of control with inflation.
	Gold has been a good safe haven in those types of situations. We're back into a similar looking situation at this moment. But the big issue for me is not just wealth insurance, but it's also being able to preserve privacy and financial transactions.
	Having whatever we can to try to get outside of this.
	And so, I just recommend again, davidknight.gold will take you to Tony Arterbin of Wise Wolf Gold.
	And you can buy gold or silver, small or large amounts.
	And you can also set up a regular savings program with his Wolf Pack.
	That gets you a quantity discount with a big buying group.
	He's now got, I think it was last time, I think he said, what was it, $1,200, I think?
	So it's growing pretty rapidly.
	And being part of a buying group, you get some discounts passed to you on that basis.
	But it's also a way that you can just gradually save.
	It's also a community there.
	So again, whether you're looking to get just one order, small or large, of gold or silver, or you want to try to gradually and systematically accumulate this, Or if you want to try to set up a metals IRA, Tony can help you with all that.
	Just go to davidknight.gold and let him know that you came through us.
	But I've known Tony a long time and I highly recommend him.
	That's one of the few things you need to know about gold right now is who you can trust to get it.
	Because it's not really much of a question as to the shape of the dollar and what is happening economically.
	Let's talk about politics, though.
	I thought this was interesting from Brian Shulhavi of Health Impact News.
	He said, we've got a couple of big events in July.
	We've got the Republican National Committee.
	It's coming up in July. Of course, the Democrats aren't going to have theirs until August.
	And we'll talk about the effect that that could have on any kind of efforts to change horses in midstream, or puppets, I guess, which don't change puppets in the middle of the show.
	But maybe they will. Who knows?
	But he said, in July we're going to have the RNC convention, and then there's another event that happens every year, and that's a conference in Sun Valley, Idaho.
	We have some of the wealthiest businesses come together.
	He said, so which one of these is going to have a bigger effect on the quote-unquote elections?
	And we put elections in air quotes because I really don't think, especially this year.
	It's getting, to me...
	You know, it's been pretty obvious for a long time, hasn't it?
	Even before the 2020 election.
	Has it been obvious to you that the elections are rigged, that they're corrupt in a lot of different ways?
	And now, after that, and then after what we've seen this year, you still want to believe that you're going to get a fair shake of the polls?
	You still want to believe, after what you've seen with both Trump and Biden from 2020 on, that it makes a difference?
	Which one of these puppets is in the Oval Office?
	I don't think it does at all.
	But he talks about, he says, so which is going to have more in effect, the Republican National Convention or the Sun Valley Conference?
	The Republican Convention will be mostly televised.
	Delegates are widely expected to choose Trump to lead the party in the fall elections.
	The vice presidential choice will be allegedly revealed there.
	But, of course, what he doesn't mention, and I think it is significant for the first time, For either party, the platform for the Republicans is going to be written behind closed doors, in secret, and you've even got some Republicans daring to question Donald Trump and his daughter-in-law over that.
	To me, that is one of the final straws.
	When you don't even allow the party faithful to go through the motions of having participation, And that's all it is.
	When you look at the party platform, and they will have platform fights, and that's what they're trying to prevent, is a platform fight over something like abortion or whatever.
	But they have those platform fights, and nobody really pays much attention to it.
	I think they'll draw more attention to the fact that they're doing it behind closed doors without any participation from the delegates.
	The delegates who go to these conventions are people who are party activists and Typically local office holders, they want to shut them down at the Republican convention to protect Trump.
	And then we take a look at Sun Valley, which will also be happening in July.
	The most powerful moguls in tech and media gather annually at an Idaho summit where mega-deals happen and where the future gets rewritten.
	This is the way it's described by a technology publication called The Information.
	And so they said, this year their thoughts are dwelling on the promise and the peril of both AI and Donald Trump.
	Artificial intelligence and an artificial president.
	Ha! An artificial Republican.
	You know, there's several models of artificial presidents that you can choose from this year.
	He's just one of them.
	They descend in their private jets on the Sun Valley, Idaho, for the annual confab hosted by Allen& Company.
	A boutique investment bank.
	And there'll be people there like Sam Altman and Max Levchin from Affirm and a lot of big people and venture capitalists.
	I believe the world situation in politics will dominate, said Barry Diller, who will also be there.
	So, there's likely to be a lot of buzzing about the prospect of renewed deal-making under a second Trump administration.
	Nobody wants to do any mergers or acquisitions right now because they're all afraid, said one person.
	There's no question that under a Trump administration, you're going to see a lot more vibrant activity of mergers and acquisitions.
	So, as Brian Shulhavi says, so here's the issue, right?
	What do these people care about?
	Are they concerned about the First Amendment or the Second Amendment?
	Are they concerned about our liberty to travel, to eat what we wish?
	No, no. They're wondering which one can make them more money in office.
	As H.L. Meekin said, an election is an advanced auction of stolen goods, but it's even worse now.
	Because it's now an advanced auction of your ability to do business, of what you can get out of this gigantic financial black hole we call Washington.
	Now, these people like this in Sun Valley, Idaho, these are the people, the worst people in the world coming to Washington to buy influence from these politicians.
	And they can get thousands of percentage return on investment for whatever they pay for the politicians.
	They can leverage that.
	And it just keeps getting more and more in terms of the amount of money given to politicians and the amount of favors that they hand out from the public treasury.
	This is why we see the explosion in the cost of running for office.
	That, folks, is a direct index into the amount of corruption with the federal government.
	Whether the candidate is left or right, says Brian, in their politics is of secondary importance as long as they can continue to make money and maintain their power base of control, which lies in the business world, not in Washington, D.C. It's what they can offer people.
	And so then that brings us to the question that everybody's talking about, Biden's mental conditions and his reluctance to leave.
	He's been very defiant about the fact that he's not going to leave.
	I think it's very interesting that there is a physician who is a Biden family physician who has been there from the beginning.
	The previous guy who was a physician to Trump and before him, the physician to Johnson, I mean to Obama, I think his name is Ronnie Johnson.
	He's now in Congress, this MD, but he was a physician to both Obama and to Trump.
	And he said, you know, when you look at this guy that is the physician for the Biden family, he's just like a Dr.
	Feelgood rubber stamp. You know, here's your drugs, whatever.
	But this guy has called in a Parkinson's specialist who has visited the White House at least nine times in the past year.
	That's almost every month.
	And they're not saying what this last time was in April.
	They're not saying what this doctor's name is, Canard.
	Interesting name.
	Dr. Canard. They're not saying what this Canard was doing there.
	They don't know the purpose of his visits.
	Why do we have a Parkinson's specialist coming nine times in the last year?
	However... These people looked up his CV. His physician profile page says that he is, quote, a neurologist and a movement disorders specialist at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.
	He researches treatments for, quote, early phase Parkinson's disease.
	And so Walter Reed is the go-to for the senior federal officials.
	And he is a Parkinson's specialist.
	I had my uncle, I've mentioned many times, who was a forestry professor at the University of Missouri and Columbia.
	He died with Parkinson's.
	And he was very elderly when he died.
	But, you know, as they mentioned this and they mentioned the issues of Parkinson's disease and how it affects your mental capacity, I thought back about how my uncle walked before he died and very much like what you see with Biden, the shuffling gate and the rest of the stuff.
	But also other mental issues.
	Alex Berenson said Parkinson's disease might be Biden's best diagnosis.
	all the disturbing symptoms we see called Parkinsonism.
	He said that's simply a fact.
	And he's quoting from a doctor, a physician, who is writing this.
	He said they consist of motor slowing, of festinating gait with reduced arm swing, a mask-like facial expression, reduced vocal volume.
	I saw that in my uncle.
	In fact, in medical school, we watch videos of participants with Parkinsonism, like Biden, to illustrate to the students how this manifests.
	The only question is what's causing it.
	The best case scenario for him would be that this is, in fact, Parkinson's disease.
	There's a lot of treatment, and the cognitive effects can be variable and sometimes not that significant, he says.
	But the worst case would be Lewy body dementia.
	This can be rapidly progressive, and the diagnosis is usually only made post-mortem or based on rapid decline.
	Other possibilities include Alzheimer's disease, though that is less likely to have Parkinsonism.
	And then finally, vascular dementia, which definitely can present like this, and the courses can be variable, sometimes plateauing for long periods of time.
	Well, here's the thing.
	Again, when we look at his condition in the debates, and we look at Trump, even his people, Trump's people say, he was just taken advantage of by the deep state.
	Like, really? Oh, okay. So he doesn't know what's going on either?
	Both of these guys are not in control?
	Is that what you're telling me here?
	Because that's the truth.
	And people won't believe that.
	What they're trying to sell you is the idea that we need to have some young, energetic person who's in control, but they won't be in control.
	It'll be the guys from Sun Valley, Idaho, and from Davos, Switzerland.
	And from Bilderberg, wherever they're having, those will be the people who are in control regardless of what individual they put up.
	It's just embarrassing for them to have somebody like Biden at this point because it shows that it's obviously, as Colonel McGregor said last week, we're being run by unelected people in the background.
	So who are these people?
	Well, we do know who these people are.
	It's bureaucracies like the CIA and others in the military-industrial complex.
	These are the people who have been running this government for a long time, since I was a child.
	So, Gavin Newsom, is he going to be the fresh face that they put out there?
	He was asked point-blank if he would run for president after the Biden, well, Biden had his interview and it did not go well.
	I could show you a lot of clips of it.
	But it was, again, more of these gaffes and things being said.
	Newsom brushed aside any suggestion that he'd be the one to take his place and direct questions from a reporter.
	He said, no, I mean, it's not even, he started to say, and then he stopped.
	He said, absolutely not, said the reporter.
	To me, he said, Newsom, it's a hypothetical that gets in the way of progress in terms of promoting this candidacy.
	He said, that's a legit question, but it's exactly where the other party wants us to be.
	Having this internal fight, and I think it's extraordinarily unhelpful.
	I said that literally the second after the debate, and of course, Newsom was on site at the debate.
	He knew. Everybody knew.
	Anderson Cooper pretends that he doesn't know, and he asks Lala Harris, you mean Lala, you don't know?
	It's like, you mean Anderson, you don't know?
	You mean Newsom, you didn't know?
	We all knew. And these are people who have closer access to them than we do.
	And so he was there to field questions, to be the Democrat Boy Scout.
	It was my first public comments to say that we should not be talking about this.
	So I've been consistent in this belief, not just privately, but publicly.
	But he's always on hand with all these things.
	As a matter of fact, Even though, I love this title that was put on one of the articles.
	They called him the hair apparent because of his model-like hair.
	Not hair, but hair.
	The hair apparent. The hair apparent says no.
	Newsom says that he won't run an open convention if Biden drops out.
	So, you believe that?
	Do you really believe that? If that's the case, then why is he traveling everywhere telling everybody how much he doesn't want the job?
	He was just in South Haven, Michigan, telling people how he didn't want to replace Biden.
	And who's running California in the meanwhile?
	Which pack of billionaires is running California in his absence?
	He's going around essentially like Brutus.
	You know, Biden is an honorable man.
	You should support this honorable man.
	Now, he wants the job.
	He wants it really badly.
	It's like Mark Anthony was saying about Brutus.
	Rubio. Points out an uncomfortable fact that people have been pointing out about him.
	A lot of people said, well, you know, Rubio's been one of the three people that has been flagged to be the VP for Trump.
	Supposedly, from the rumor mill, it's Rubio, J.D. Vance, or Burgum.
	I've got problems with all of them.
	Again, I'm...
	I don't see anybody that I could even halfway support at the top of the ticket or the bottom of the ticket in either party.
	But Rubio lives in Florida, and so does Trump, and so there's a problem with that.
	You're not supposed to have the president and the vice president from the same state.
	That's prohibited. Wait, do we care about the Constitution anymore?
	Do we care about citizen requirements?
	No, we don't care about that.
	Do we care about the residency things?
	No, we don't seem to care about that.
	But because people have been giving Rubio a hard time about that, And of course, they just waive it or ignore it, whatever.
	He says, well, you know, you can't have Lala Harris and Newsom on the same ticket.
	So there you go. And so with something like that, you know, they'll just waive that or overlook that.
	There's talk now from some Democrat donors and some high-ranking officials of having what they call a blitz primary.
	Blitz creed. Lightning war.
	Do it fast. Do it warp speed.
	It could open up the Democratic race if Biden drops out.
	A pair of well-connected Democrats is offering an optimistic plan that would involve the president stepping down as a nominee in the party announcing a blitz primary process ahead of the August convention.
	Now, I can see that happening.
	I still think my hunch is still that this is going to be a wag the Biden thing, as I talked about on Wednesday last week.
	You know, put out Biden as a little underdog and the sympathetic old Joe.
	I worked in Wag the Dog.
	They had the guy who was on his way back, Shue.
	Remember that? And so they created this campaign to help old Shue.
	Everybody tied their shoes together, shoelaces, and threw them up over power lines and stuff like that.
	Bring home old Shue. I could just see them doing that.
	Bring home old Joe.
	Bring him back. Sentimental favorite.
	They make him the underdog.
	If he's got one good performance, they'll harp on that somewhere.
	But this is what they're suggesting could possibly be done.
	Biden would step down as a Democrat nominee in mid-July, announce the new system, and have the backing of Lala Harris.
	Next, potential candidates would have a few days to throw their respective hats in the ring.
	The Democrat Party would then begin a primary sprint in which the six candidates who received the most votes from delegates pledged to run positive-only campaigns in the month leading up to the convention.
	You know, this could work for them.
	It's kind of like a warp speed version of a primary.
	You know, forget the testing.
	Forget the debates.
	Forget the primaries. Let's just roll it out.
	We've got to get this out. No time, right?
	The mRNA election.
	The Blitz primary would involve weekly forums with each candidate moderated by some cultural icon, Michelle Obama, Oprah, Taylor Swift, or some of the names that were floated in the memo, in order to engage voters.
	You see what we're looking at here? It's like stealing Donald Trump's Apprentice show here.
	It'd be like The Apprentice, The Democrat Apprentice.
	It's like reality TV. Oh, that's right.
	All of it is reality TV, isn't it?
	It's all just a pageant.
	Submitted for your approval, as Rod Serling would say.
	We're in the twilight zone now, folks.
	We really are. The nominee would ultimately be chosen by the delegates using ranked choice voting before the start of the Chicago Convention on August 19th.
	And it would be announced with plenty of fanfare on the third day of the gathering.
	The memo imagines the nominee unveiled on stage with Biden, Barack Obama, and Bill Clinton.
	A reality TV show. It's a pageant.
	The country would be captivated.
	Donations would pour in.
	And we can just rewrite that just like they're going to rewrite the Constitution and everything else as soon as whoever gets in, whether it is Biden or whether it's Trump.
	These next four years, they're going to finish the Great Reset to try to usher in the 2030.
	It's going to be up to us at the local level.
	You better pay attention to the local elections.
	What's coming from either Republicans or Democrats at the national level is going to be horrific.
	And it's going to be an absolute refutation of all that we have seen.
	We're already seeing this in the election.
	I mean, we've got all these lawfare trials against Trump and everything else, and now this Democrat mutiny.
	And it's going to be that way, whether it is the Democrats and Biden or somebody else who wins or whether Trump wins.
	In response, a Biden campaign spokesperson pointed to comments made by the president last week about staying in the race.
	He said in Wisconsin, I'm not letting one 90-minute debate wipe out three and a half years of work.
	I'm staying in the race and I'll beat Donald Trump.
	Yeah, as a matter of fact, he was real adamant about that.
	Well, guess what? They're trying to push me out on the race.
	No! Well, let me say this as clear as I can.
	I'm staying in the race!
	Yeah! I'll beat Donald Trump.
	I will beat him again in 2020.
	He's going to beat him again in 2020.
	Oops, oops.
	Don't really know, yeah.
	Don't really know what date it is, do we?
	And so the question then becomes, wait a minute, there are some state laws about how long you have to have a candidate be in place.
	You can't just put somebody in at the last minute.
	And so there's a lot of different state laws.
	There was an article at the Daily Mail where they talked about the amount of time that the various states require these candidates to be identified.
	And let's just start with the very first one.
	They've got them all in alphabetical order.
	Alabama. Alabama is a good example.
	Because in Alabama, they require parties to submit the names of their certified candidates 82 days prior to the general election.
	That means they would need to have them by August the 15th.
	However, the Democratic Party's nominating convention isn't until the week following that deadline.
	So they're supposed to, in Alabama, you're required by law to submit the certified candidates.
	By August the 15th, but they're not even going to have the convention until August the 23rd.
	And so Biden is not really the certified candidate until the convention happens.
	And so they'd already planned to ignore that.
	The Alabama legislature unanimously passed a motion to allow the DNC to notify the state of the presidential nomination on August the 23rd.
	So again They're gonna waive the legal requirements. I've seen this over and over again with third-party stuff for example I've mentioned this before when I was with the Libertarian Party there was There was a couple of times that happened where you would have a situation a heavily Democrat district for example and Republicans wouldn't even run a candidate and this happens a lot. You know if because of gerrymandering and things like that you have these strong
	Jurisdictions where maybe they don't run a candidate for Congress, so they maybe don't even run a candidate for the state legislature They just assume the other party is going to win it.
	And if somebody wants to be a sacrificial goat and run into that, they can do that.
	But, you know, they don't really push it.
	And so we had situations when I was with the Libertarian Party where they would have a Libertarian who would get on the ballot and run and no Republican filed.
	And the deadline passed.
	All right. Big excitement.
	We got a two-way race.
	That's good. Instead of a three-way race.
	And so as soon as Republicans saw that, they got concerned.
	Yeah. And they went to court and they found a Republican candidate in several of these cases.
	And the judge would always say, yeah, you're right, democracy is not served if we don't have a Republican candidate, so we'll waive the deadline for you and you can get on the ballot.
	Now, they would never say that about a third-party candidate.
	They would always hold us to the letter of the law.
	You've got to dot every I and cross every T and you better make every deadline as well.
	And you're seeing that now with RFK Jr., Right?
	So, even after you do everything, they'll come back and they'll challenge signatures and do things like that, throw you off the ballot.
	RFK Jr. got on the ballot in North Carolina.
	They threw him off. Now, I don't know if he's gotten back on, but they'll do that type of thing.
	So, you've got a lot of states, and their law is going to conflict with what Democrats are doing.
	Guess what? Democrats don't care.
	And they will waive all these legal requirements, and the Republicans will be right there with them, pushing it, because it's been done for Republicans before.
	And they don't want to look like they're bad guys or something like that, so they'll do that.
	None of those things matter. Again, this so-called election, it's never been more obvious that it is a selection.
	And so the excrement is going to hit the fan today, said many people, as all these people in Congress are coming back to Washington.
	I don't think so. I think it's going to be a big pressure campaign.
	As I said before, if somebody pushes Biden out and he doesn't want to be pushed out...
	And I think that he is just like these other people like Darth Vader Ginsburg and like Diane Frankenstein.
	You know, their attitude towards their Supreme Court seat or their Senate seat or whatever is out of my cold, dead hands, over my dead body.
	And these people will stay there no matter what their physical or mental condition is.
	They refuse to leave.
	And even when there's talk and whisper from people within the party, as there was with Frankenstein, Diane Frankenstein, even Pelosi was trying to nudge her out.
	They'd just stay there. And a lot of people got upset with Ginsburg because she wouldn't voluntarily step down when, you know, Obama could replace her.
	Instead, Trump got a chance to replace her, a Republican.
	So, you know, these people, first of all, don't think they're ever going to die.
	Secondly, they are so addicted to power, you can't pry it out of their hands.
	Now, a person like that, and Biden is definitely a person like that, one of the most authoritarian people I've watched politics all my life.
	I've never seen anybody as bad as Biden.
	He absolutely hates the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the very concept of natural rights.
	He came after Clarence Thomas over that very issue.
	The Democrats wanted him to attack Clarence Thomas over the Anita Hill accusations.
	He attacked Clarence Thomas over the fact that Clarence Thomas supported the principles this country was founded on in the Declaration of Independence.
	And so I think a guy like that is not going to step down.
	I think a guy like that will do everything he can to punish people that come against him, just like Trump does.
	And so I think people, I don't think it's going to be excrement hits the fan today.
	I think they're going to fall in line.
	And there's a lot of people that are going to be beating them into line.
	It's not just Biden. A lot of people are going to be doing that.
	But there have been, as Zero Hedge points out, seven major news organizations that have staged a mockingbird-like PR coup against Biden, for whom they spent five years running cover.
	When they say mockingbird, what they're talking about is the CIA Operation Mockingbird.
	Or you had people like Walter Cronkite and others, so respected, and yet they were getting fed scripts from the CIA, talking points from the CIA. Cover these issues.
	Say this about these issues.
	That's one of the reasons why, when I was growing up, the news was always the same.
	They had three major networks that all do a half-hour news show, and they would all cover the same issues, and they all had the same opinion.
	Because it was the CIA's opinion that they were repeating.
	I used to watch it just because I liked the Beethoven's...
	Beethoven's third movement of the Ninth Symphony on the NBC News.
	Huntley Brinkley Report. Anyway, according to just the news, the Dirty Seven are the New York Times, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, we used to call it the Atlanta Urinal Constipation, the New Yorker, the Chicago Tribune, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, and the Economist, and Zero Hedge.
	Tweeted out and put it in their article.
	They said, of course, if they really want to twist the knife, dear liberal media, we know you are suddenly desperate to get rid of old Joe.
	So there is this thing called Ashley Biden's diary.
	You may finally want to look into that.
	You know, this issue right here.
	In her diary, she talked about what her dad did with her.
	Isn't it interesting how we have two bonafide pedophiles running for president?
	It's not just that they've got the usual people controlling them, but we've just had a document dump of Epstein documents naming Donald Trump.
	One person accused Donald Trump of raping her when she was a minor.
	If you are pro-Trump, And also very angry about what Jeffrey Epstein did.
	Then I'm gonna need you to pick one.
	Because listen to this.
	So what gives?
	Donald Trump is leading in the polls and Democrats are in disarray over Biden.
	So why is Donald Trump in such a foul mood?
	Several Trump associates point to this.
	Judge orders surprise release of Epstein transcripts and Donald Trump appears in Epstein document dump. Donald Trump's name appears again and again.
	And again and again in the new document dump that just took place of the grand jury documents relating to criminal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein.
	As ex-user Malay writes, prior to marrying Melania in January 2005, Trump was calling Jeffrey Epstein in 2004 on the regular.
	We see Donald's phone messages in the West Palm Beach indictment of Epstein released today.
	His messages are in between girls calling to confirm massage appointments and messages from disgraced modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel.
	What did they talk about?
	The questions are once again drawing more attention to the Trump friendship with Epstein.
	Donald Trump began palling around with Jeffrey Epstein in the 1980s.
	Video footage unearthed by NBC News in 2019 shows the two men Joking around and ogling women during a party at Trump's Mar-a-Lago in 1992 An invitation into Donald Trump's world Footage from 1992 found in the NBC archives shows the future president welcoming Jeffrey Epstein to his Mar-a-Lago estate.
	The get-together more than a decade before Epstein pleaded guilty to prostitution charges in Florida.
	Both men are seen enjoying themselves.
	Trump pointing out women dancing in front of them.
	Of course, you have seen that.
	I've shown that many times. And, you know, the pictures of Melania and that interesting expression that she has on her face as she's snuggling up to Jeffrey Epstein as they have the foursome there of Epstein and Ghislaine and Trump and Melania.
	Many people have said that it was Epstein that introduced Trump to Melania.
	But the two of them were fast friends, and they hung out both in New York and in Palm Beach until they had a dispute over a piece of property that they both wanted to buy.
	Prosecutors knew that Epstein had sex with underage girls years before the plea deal.
	Transcripts reveal that people called it outrageous that this would be allowed.
	And again...
	You know, the new document dump that is there.
	Katie Johnson is the one who says that Trump raped her at the age of 13.
	Again, that's our choice with these guys.
	And throw in RFK Jr.
	too, right, when you're looking at this kind of stuff.
	These are the only people that get advanced.
	See, it's a selection.
	Who do you think is selecting the presidency?
	Is it Satan himself?
	Is it judgment from God?
	That's what I think it is.
	The transcripts reveal the deal between Epstein and prosecutors came two years after they learned that Epstein had engaged in statutory rape of teenage girls, plural, and resulted in minimal punishment for the billionaire human trafficker.
	Florida's Southern District Attorney, Alex Acosta, remember him?
	He became Trump's labor secretary.
	It's such a small little Peyton place, such a small little Charles Dickens type of novel, isn't it?
	Where they all know each other, have these relationships.
	So, Alex Acosta was a prosecuting attorney.
	He served for a period of time as Trump's former Secretary of Labor.
	He approved a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein in 2008, despite the prosecutor's knowing of the rapes.
	Acosta eventually left the Trump administration in scandal after details emerged outlining his botched prosecution of Epstein.
	And yet, everything about it has Trump's fingerprints all over it.
	When you look at who were the two defense attorneys for Epstein, they got this sweetheart deal from Alex Acosta.
	It was Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr.
	Ken Starr, who let Clinton skate free with all the allegations of corruption, violent sexual assault, and rape against Clinton, he let him go.
	He came after him saying that he had committed perjury over a consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky.
	And then, of course, the next thing he does is he shows up as a defense attorney for Jeffrey Epstein.
	And then finally, and it was kind of the capstone of Ken Starr's career, Ken Starr was always put forward as this paragon of Christian virtue.
	And he became president of Baylor, a nominal Christian college.
	And he covered up and defended the football team when it was accused of sexual assault.
	I don't know if it was rape as part of that or if it was just sexual assault.
	But that was his three strikes and you're out type of thing.
	But then Fox News picked him up as a contributor.
	No problem with that.
	They love to find people just like they did with Dennis Hastert.
	You know, they pick people that are known pedophiles, people that they can easily blackmail, and that's true of Trump.
	It's true of Biden.
	Folks, they're the same.
	They're the same.
	And if you look at their policies, you think their policies are different?
	You know, when we look at what is happening and what they say they want to do with the...
	When it comes to abortion, one of the reasons they want to do this behind closed doors is because as you look at what these people are, here's a good example of it.
	We're about to run out of time, so I'm going to skip forward to this.
	There was a woman in Germany.
	She was an attorney for Porsche, and she has been put on trial for murder because she had an unwanted baby and she threw it over the balcony.
	And of course the baby died.
	She and her attorney considered that that was justifiable because this baby was going to be getting in the way of her career.
	We've heard this over and over again, haven't we?
	This is the way the Democrats sell this.
	Luxury car executive throws newborn baby from the window to her death, feared that motherhood would ruin her career.
	I wonder who told her that. Except the reality is that we've got Republican politicians like J.D. Vance, like Blake Masters, you know, who's now pro-Trump, pro-Trump, pro-Trump.
	That's all the sign says. But J.D. Vance, yeah, he's on board with the abortion pill.
	So is Trump. They all want to do whatever they can to just, they want to throw the baby out the window, folks, so they can get their position in politics.
	That's what this is about. They are no different than this woman, this attorney for Porsche.
	They're more than willing to throw the babies out the window.
	So they can get what they want in their career.
	Although she was tried for murder, Katarina Jovanovic, 28, in Germany, was found guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter.
	Because, hey, you know, we let people murder, you know, women can murder their kids all the time.
	It's just that you really should go through this procedure that's approved with abortion and all the rest of that stuff.
	And again, she was an attorney.
	Did she not know? A horrified passerby alerted the police after discovering the baby, whose skull had been shattered from the fall, on the tarmac beneath Jovanovic's window.
	Well, quite frankly, what she did was far more humane than the abortionist.
	She didn't rip the baby apart limb by limb, which is what they do when they do an abortion.
	The baby died instantly, on impact.
	Far more humane.
	The accused is not prepared to put her life plans on hold, especially her professional advancement for a child, the prosecutor told the court.
	That was her decision when the baby was born, and as a result, the criteria for a murder conviction is fulfilled.
	In other words, this is premeditated.
	I'm not going to let this baby get in the way of my career.
	Her attorney, however, said it was an accident.
	She dropped the baby.
	How the child ended up over the windowsill remains to be determined, said the lawyer.
	We don't know how that happened.
	You know, accidents happen.
	Well, you know, I guess we can see that same kind of explanation from the politicians who are out there.
	And it really doesn't matter what they do.
	You can throw the babies out the window.
	The only thing that matters is, are you pro-Trump?
	Pro-Trump, pro-Trump, pro-Trump, says Blake Masters.
	This is sent to me by Mark Listener.
	He said, yeah, we're witnessing a new apex in political marketing.
	No values, no principles, no positions, just shameless pandering.
	Yeah, you can throw the babies out along with any and all principles.
	That's exactly what these people are doing.
	J.D. Vance says, I support access to the abortion pill, Mephistopheles, because it is satanic.
	He has no problem with that. He said that yesterday on Meet the Press.
	And so he said the Heritage Foundation does a lot of good work and it does a lot of things that I disagree with and a lot of things I agree with.
	It works with public policy, blah, blah, blah, talking about the bloodless revolution.
	Now, if they want to have a second American revolution, a political revolution, in the ballot box that is bloodless, how is that a bad thing?
	But ripping babies apart...
	A bloody murder of a baby, that's okay.
	That's okay. A bloodless revolution?
	No. No. We don't want that.
	But if we rip babies apart, that's fine.
	That's America.
	That's God's judgment.
	That's why we have pedophiles like Donald, Benedict, Donald, Trump, and why we have old Joe.
	These pedophiles are ruling over us.
	That's why the government looks the way it does.
	That's why they're pushing this mutilation of kids in elementary school.
	Thanks for joining us.
	Let me tell you.
	The David Knight Show.
	You can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidKnightShow.com.

▲