Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 3, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:29

The David Knight Show - 07/03/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 3rd of July, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take one more look here.
	There's been so much talk in the last week about what's going to happen with Biden.
	Will they go through with a great replacement?
	Well, I think I've worked out what's going to happen.
	I've got an idea. I'm going to tell you about it.
	I'll call it Wag the Biden.
	And I think it's very plausible.
	So we'll talk about that.
	We're also going to talk about the technocracy.
	Davos and Klaus are having their summer Davos in China, of course.
	Because China is exactly what the technocrats want to create globally.
	And he's talking about how the stakeholders are going to force you and I, and of course they're moving towards that with a bird flu summit coming up very soon, and a new vaccine for humans that's going to, the contract has already been given, the money has been given by BARDA, not DARPA, but BARDA, to Moderna.
	We'll be right back.
	Well as we were talking just before we came on air, and I know people are going to notice this, the background here, even though that's a patriot, they're standing on the side, the flag, as Travis pointed out, it's a modern flag.
	It's not what they fought with.
	Yeah, I think we've got maybe a Revolutionary War, maybe a Civil War or whatever coming up anyway.
	So maybe that's what it'll look like.
	Get your Revolutionary cap and your long coat and you can do some role-playing there.
	Anyway, let's begin with Biden.
	And with the wag to Biden.
	Stephanopoulos is going to have his first interview.
	It's going to be the first interview with Biden after the debate.
	And it's not going to be done live.
	I wonder why. You know, George Stephanopoulos was a Clinton senior advisor, White House communications director.
	He is somebody that's going to be there to try to help Biden.
	And... Yet at the same time, we see this back and forth for a week now.
	We've had essentially this civil war within the Democrat Party.
	A lot of people began with a lot of anonymous talk.
	Now, a few people have come out, some smaller donors, some minor politicians have put their name to it.
	But for the most part, most of this stuff was done anonymously.
	You hear things like this.
	Sources say, 15 occasions in the last year and a half that Biden appeared just as he did during the debate.
	Well, that's not surprising. We all understood that.
	Why is this? Are they acting as if this is some kind of surprise?
	Well, these people, several of them, who were very close to President Biden, who love him.
	They love him. And have supported him.
	And have been among them arson people, they said.
	That's the way it was put in Breitbart.
	I think they meant to put in there, are some people.
	But they put arson people.
	Somebody was dictating this into speech transcription.
	They didn't catch it. But they are arson people.
	They're secretly lighting fires while they're praising him.
	They're burning his house down trying to...
	Anyway, among them, arson people who have raised a lot of money for him said this...
	This guy Bernstein, Carl Bernstein, of course, you know, the Watergate people.
	But, you know, he's got anonymous sources.
	They're telling him that.
	Must still be getting information from Deep Throat.
	Why Kamala Harris would be Biden's likeliest replacement, of course.
	Well, the Wall Street Journal says that.
	They said, despite her own political weaknesses...
	I don't think they're political weaknesses.
	I think they're mental weaknesses.
	And I don't think it's despite her mental weaknesses, but because of her mental weaknesses that she's in this position.
	Look, they want puppets.
	They don't want somebody who's got a mind of their own.
	If they do, they're going to have to get rid of them.
	And so, you know, you can have somebody like a George H.W. Bush, who's part of the CIA. You know, I can leave him there.
	But for the most part, they want people who are amiable, likable.
	And of course, that is a bit of a problem for her, even though she tries to be likable.
	Like, they cannot remove her.
	It's unavoidable if they try to remove her.
	They're going to be accused of being sexist, racist, and all the rest of this stuff.
	That will be death for any Democrat who tries to do something like that.
	That's what they're all about. That would be seen as a sign of hypocrisy to ignore why she was put there in the first place.
	DEI. Major U.S. Democrat donors are threatening the party over Biden.
	See a pattern? It's all this anonymous stuff.
	Now, they do name one person who has given, they said, several hundred thousand dollars to the Democrat Party.
	Whitney Tilson, never heard of him, former hedge fund manager.
	He went on record, but for the most part, it's still anonymous sources that are in the background.
	Daily Mail claimed the discontent appears to be turning into a full-blown party revolt.
	Democrat donors are threatening to pull the plug unless Biden drops out.
	Meanwhile, several Democrats interviewed by the tabloid invented their frustration at what they called attempts by Biden's team to gaslight them into believing there was nothing to worry about.
	Again, anonymous people. The people who do speak out, for the most part, are people who say kind things about Biden.
	They stand behind him.
	They're in line for the presidency for that. People like Whitmer, people like Gavin, nuisance.
	They're getting in line for the presidency.
	They know that it's inevitable that even if he were to get reelected, that he's not going to serve out his term. They want to play nice. They want to be seen by the public as playing nice.
	Be seen as a team player.
	Former Hillary aide claims that the debate was set up as a quote soft coup by Democrats to replace Biden and This is what I said from the very beginning Going back to the date that they put the first debate in.
	Never had a debate before the convention.
	Never had a debate between the two nominees until they were officially nominees.
	Now, there were never any debates during the primaries.
	There were never by these guys.
	They shut them all down. And, of course, there was never any real primaries by either one of them.
	This has been a selection, not an election.
	And it continues along that strange path that we've not ever seen before.
	Always in the past, there would be a convention sometime around August.
	At this time, as I said before, you would usually have at least a challenging party.
	You would have a strong frontrunner, and everybody else would be eliminated except a number two person who's kind of far back.
	And it's usually talked about what could happen at the convention and things like that.
	And then the debates, that would happen in August, the conventions.
	First debate would be the end of September, then the second one, the middle of October.
	Third one, last week of October, before the election, the first week of November.
	That's typically the way it's always been done for decades.
	Not this time. A former Hillary Clinton aide, still anonymous, told the Daily Mail that they wanted Biden to be exposed so that he could be replaced by a more capable candidate. There has never been a debate this early before, said the source.
	What I'm saying, there's growing belief that this was a soft coup because they know he isn't fit to govern and have known it for some time.
	While there was still time to replace him, they wanted to have him fail to rise to the occasion, and he did that spectacularly. The anonymous source said there were whispers for weeks that Joe's going down at the debate.
	Daily Mail also claimed that Gretchen Whitmer secretly sent out an advanced team to Washington, D.C. weeks ago to prepare a snap presidential campaign.
	And, of course, Gavin Newsom has been hovering like a vulture around all these presidential proceedings.
	Look, even a Biden...
	When, as I said before, he will not complete his term.
	So they're getting themselves in place.
	Meanwhile, despite public support for Biden, Obama's privately lobbying to get rid of him, is what some other anonymous sources.
	It's all gossip.
	It's all like high school elections, isn't it?
	Because there's no issues.
	You notice how in the Democrat Party, not only is there now a division, civil war, but it's all about personalities.
	It's not about any policies.
	Just like in the Republican side.
	It's all about Trump.
	It's not about... It's Trump versus DeSantis or Trump versus Nikki Haley or whatever.
	It's not about any policies.
	Michelle Obama's chances of becoming president surged with the bookmakers.
	They said the odds on Michelle Obama winning the 2024 election surged.
	And so now they've got people who are placing bets on this.
	Look, these people are gamblers.
	They're not political operatives.
	Political operatives are not guessing what's going to happen.
	They're going to make things happen.
	That's Newsweek talking about that.
	And then you have Jill Biden.
	She goes on the cover of Vogue.
	And they do everything they can to make her look good.
	And New York Post, as is so frequently the case, they are great at satire.
	Right up there with a babbling bee.
	They come out, they put Joe on the cover of Vague.
	As Jill Swans for Vogue, here's the cover that Biden should have done.
	Vague. And it says, Jill Biden answers questions for her husband.
	Five ways to explain away a bad night.
	Hotel fashion for fall rubber sole shoes.
	How to beat Medicare.
	And the best activities between 10 a.m.
	and 4 p.m. And there's Biden with a blank stare on his face.
	Well, Jill Biden is portrayed in vogue as, quote, a simple school principal.
	They don't say simple.
	They just put her in there. Oh, she's just a school principal.
	And now she seems to be playing president.
	Really, in so many different areas, I tell him what I'm seeing and what I'm hearing, and he gets it.
	And this is where the magic happens.
	That's a quote from the story.
	Yeah, I'm president. That was pulled out by Julie Kelly in a tweet.
	I had talked about how she's been doing this for quite some time.
	When they went to the first G7, she put this up, prepping for the G7, just so that you know that she's really the power behind the throne.
	As Vogue is doing that, they're telling us, okay, you know, Jill's there.
	That's good. The New York Post said, prepping for the G7, she wrote on her official Twitter account, Flotus, the first lady of the U.S., U.S. government official account, she said, another photo, scholarly Dr.
	Jill wearing reading glasses, pen in hand, and studying a thick binder of notes.
	There's that picture right there.
	Okay? Look at all that paperwork.
	Oh, she's so busy. A flight jacket with a presidential seal is draped over the back of a chair.
	That's not accidental, is it?
	All of this stuff is scripted.
	Very careful to do that.
	So you have no doubt about the power behind the throne.
	So the presidential jacket is there, emblematic of Biden.
	The empty suit.
	And... But there's Jill, the empty suit behind her with the presidential seal, and she's busy working all of this stuff through.
	She's about a decade younger than Biden.
	I see her as a first lady in the Eleanor Roosevelt mold, getting out into the community, making sure those voices are getting heard in Washington.
	Said the wife of Bernie Sanders, just praising her.
	Even when Bernie was running against Biden.
	Oh man, if Bernie Sanders' wife is for her, I mean, what an endorsement.
	Yeah, especially because...
	Why do they dig up Bernie Sanders' wife?
	Well, she's digging up Eleanor Roosevelt, who is not...
	Jill may be in the mold of Eleanor Roosevelt, but Eleanor Roosevelt truly is in mold right now, I think.
	I just can't comprehend why these people care what any of these people have to say.
	Who cares what Bernie Sanders' wife thinks of anyone?
	Yeah. Well, that's what they're trying to do, trying to pull this up.
	And look, it's a real warning sign.
	The wife of our most communist candidate that we've had also loves Eleanor Roosevelt.
	It was a full-on communist herself.
	It's crazy.
	And I'm going to tell you why this, and again, it's important for us to look at these people, to understand how rigged this whole process is.
	It is a selection, folks.
	It's a selection on both sides.
	Now, Tucker Carlson is out there saying, Biden is done.
	Bet on it, he said.
	Well, there's a lot of people who are already betting on it.
	They're betting on Michelle Obama.
	Saw some people had rented one of these airplanes that pulls a sign behind it and flew it when Biden was having that rally.
	And it said, by done.
	B-I dash done.
	Actually, they should have made it B-Y-E. By done.
	You know, it's like so long.
	Of course, that would have been an extra letter.
	Maybe it would have been more on the expense of the sign.
	I don't know. But that's the way they should have done it.
	Like, I disagree. I disagree that Biden is done, and I'll take that bet.
	I don't have the money that Tucker Carlson does to place the bet, but I'll take a small bet with him on that.
	He said, too many prominent Democrats have suggested that he's brain damaged, and they can't walk that back.
	They have to remove him, and they will, said Tucker.
	The only question is when.
	If they're smart, they'll do it immediately.
	He said, if Kamala's going to be the nominee, she might as well be president first.
	That leaves the question of Trump and his sentencing on July 11th.
	Well, they've now said they're not going to do that because of the immunity claim.
	They're going to move that further out.
	Politico has said essentially the same thing.
	Dems freak out over Biden's debate performance.
	Biden is toast.
	One prominent operative, anonymous, It says, time for an open convention.
	That was from Politico.
	Well, on Rumble, DGA says, David, maybe you should have Julie Green on so she can tell you who will be the Democratic nominee.
	Yeah, we're going to thus sayeth the Lord from this false prophet.
	I'm sure that would settle it all.
	See, what we should do is have her on and get her opinion on who she thinks won't be the nominee, and then bet on that one.
	That's right. Yeah, you go just like you want to invest with Nancy Pelosi, but you want to go the opposite of Jim Cramer, and you want to go the opposite of Julie Green.
	This is what I think is going to happen.
	54-45. What does that mean?
	It's a slogan. It's from the...
	Remember the main. Yeah, that's from the...
	That's gotta be... Tip a canoe entitled to it.
	No, that's not the...
	They're war slogans, Mr.
	Morse. We remember the slogans, we can't even remember the f***ing wars.
	You know why? Why? It's show business.
	That's why we're here. I see.
	Naked girl, covered in napalm.
	V for victory. Five marines raising the flag.
	Mount Suribachi. Mm-hmm.
	You remember the picture 50 years from now, you'll have forgotten the war.
	What? To go for it. Smart bomb falling down the chimney.
	2,500 missions a day.
	100 days. One video of one bomb, Mr.
	Moss. The American people bought that war.
	War is show business.
	That's why we're here. And what do you do for the president?
	Why Obanian? Why not?
	They gotta know at some point.
	Who? Who?
	The, uh, you know, the...
	The, the, the public.
	They gotta know? Yes.
	Stan, get with us. Who killed Kennedy?
	I read the first draft of the Warren Report.
	Says he was killed by a drunk driver.
	You what's to go for? What do you see day after day?
	The one smart bomb falling down the chimney.
	The truth? I was in the building when we shot that shot.
	We shot it in a studio, Falls Church, Virginia, one-tenth scale model of a building.
	Is that true? How the do we know?
	You take my son? And you want me to do what?
	We want you to produce.
	You want me to produce your war?
	Not a war. It's a pageant.
	We need a theme, a song, some visuals.
	We need, you know, it's a pageant.
	It's like the Oscars. That's why we came to you.
	I never won an Oscar.
	Maybe they should get David Mamet, who has won several of them, who wrote the script for that.
	Of course, David Mamet is now a libertarian.
	He's not a Democrat anymore.
	Maybe they should listen to him.
	Somebody knows how this stuff is working.
	Okay, let's run through this, and let's make a distinction between Biden, the puppet, And I'll call it Biden-C. Biden-C. Biden Collective.
	This faceless group of people behind him.
	We don't know who it is. People like the Robert De Niro character there.
	These people who are behind Biden.
	The Biden-C. So, are they going to replace him?
	Well, if you get rid of Biden, you're stuck with Lala, right?
	As bad or worse.
	If you get rid of both of them...
	Well, you take out the president, the vice president, who's next in line, that's the Speaker of the House.
	You can't do that either, right?
	And what would be the basis for removing her anyway?
	And if they did that, imagine, as I said before, the pushback within the Democrat Party.
	Racist, sexist, all the rest of this stuff, because she was picked simply because of her race and her sex.
	So she cannot be removed because of her race and her sex.
	So you get Machiavelli and Mike.
	You wouldn't get Big Mike, you'd get Little Mike that's there.
	They want to find some way they could get Big Mike or Gavin Nuisance or something like that.
	And then here's another problem.
	As I pointed out yesterday in SurveyUSA, a third of the Democrats that they polled wanted Biden gone, but that means that two-thirds don't.
	Two-thirds don't.
	See, Biden could be replaced at the convention, but what happens if they replace him at the convention?
	And so could Lala.
	They could replace both of them at the convention if they wanted to.
	Again, a lot of problems if they replace Lala.
	Unless they found another black woman, like Michelle Obama, to be at the top.
	But it would still be perceived by the public as nasty.
	It would seem like a betrayal.
	Like a backstabbing.
	And whatever Brutus emerged from that, it would be a pyrrhic victory.
	For stabbing Caesar.
	Okay? So I don't think that that's going to work for them, really, to replace them at convention.
	And so Biden C, the Biden Collective, has got a lot of power as well to punish anybody who would forcefully push him out if he doesn't want to go.
	Do you think they would use that against Democrats?
	Well, you better believe they would. He's all about using his political power to prosecute people.
	And I think a lot of these people know what each other's skeletons in the closets are.
	They can find a number of ways to do it, and he would have still another six months to go, pretty much.
	That'd be August, five months, whatever.
	So, the debate debacle.
	What was up with that?
	Did they purposely withhold his meds, as Dr.
	Shee was saying? You know, look at that.
	He said he's completely out of it.
	Then they do a schedule an event.
	And maybe there they gave him the actual meds.
	And I agree with that.
	That could be a possibility.
	And yet, if one thing that the Biden family knows, and that's drugs...
	And do you think that Jill Biden would, why would she go along with that?
	Well, there may be a reason why she would go along with it, but I don't think that if his meds were withheld, it would be with her knowledge and consent.
	So think about that. It's not something that she would be aware that he was not acting right.
	She'd get him some more meds or whatever.
	So again, that Biden family, Hunter, they could have talked to him, gotten him something.
	But nevertheless, so what is the master plan?
	I just don't believe any of these evil people care about anyone at all besides themselves.
	I don't think Jill cares about Joe.
	I think every single one of them is wishing they could be Henry VIII and just off with their head at any given moment.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. Absolutely.
	It's a vicious circle.
	All these people in Washington, pretty much.
	Both parties. You know, it's a vicious, backstabbing circle of people that are there.
	So, what might be the master plan for Biden-C? Well, here's my little wag the dog idea.
	Let's imagine that Biden-C wanted to run against Trump.
	And folks, they did.
	They pulled all the strings.
	All this lawfare against Trump?
	Don't tell me that these political operatives don't know that was going to be down to his being seen as a victim.
	And if they didn't know that from the very beginning, they knew it right away at the beginning.
	All of Trump's opponents in the Republican Party saw it.
	Anybody who knows anything about politics saw it.
	You had some Democrats like James Carville Who is old and retired and kind of this get-off-my-lawn curmudgeon.
	Well, he always was a get-off-my-lawn curmudgeon, but especially now with his age and the fact that he's not officially going to run any campaigns in the future.
	He doesn't have to worry about who he offends.
	He said this from the beginning. He goes, stop doing this.
	You're making a hero out of him.
	Every time you do this, his donations go up and his poll numbers go up.
	And, of course, it was the indictments that completely shut down the Republican primaries.
	Nobody could compete against him.
	Even if you've got DeSantis who wants to talk policy, and when they start taking questions, it's like, well, what are you going to do about Trump?
	What do you mean, what am I going to do?
	That's in New York. I mean, are you going to extradite him to New York?
	Of course not. But it all became about the Trump lawfare and where that come from.
	The Biden Sea, the Biden Collective.
	They knew that.
	They knew that probably before they began it, but they certainly knew it from the very beginning, and they went along with that.
	They wanted to run against Trump.
	Not any other Republican.
	Can you imagine how bad it would have been, how much even worse it would have been if Biden had run against DeSantis?
	Or even Nikki Haley, who I don't support in any way, shape, or form.
	But they would have been younger, they would have been sharper.
	Biden C, the collective, ran all this lawfare against Trump.
	They knew it. And then when you look at RFK Jr., what'd they do?
	Well, they made sure that he wasn't going to get on anywhere.
	They even shut down, completely shut down the primary in Florida, the DNC did.
	And so, any competition from RFK, he got pushed out even of the Democrat Party, but any competition from him can easily be shut down.
	I know, I've worked with this stuff, and of course now, in North Carolina, they're working to take him off the ballot, and I think they will succeed.
	Ballot access is where election corruption begins.
	And, of course, the debate access is the next thing there.
	But here's the problem for the Democrats.
	It's not enough for the Democrats to hate Trump.
	You've got to have a base that's got some love for Biden.
	You really do need to have that.
	It's not enough for him just to be the anti-Trump.
	They've got to like him, and they don't.
	And so the Biden see, I believe, deliberately ran this martyr card with a debate.
	And I think what they want to get is sympathy for him.
	And I think it worked hugely.
	And I think after they ran the martyr card for Trump with a lawfare, they're running the martyr card for Biden with the debate flop.
	So, if there's going to be a convention fight...
	I think that a Biden is going to, that will be the dark night of the soul, if you go back and you look at Save the Cat.
	What was the guy's name?
	Blake something, he wrote that.
	And it basically is a pattern that Hollywood uses all the time.
	You know, like, wag the dog. You have an opening, and he's even got a beat.
	He even talks about the pacing of the typical Hollywood film.
	And you go for a certain number of beats, a certain number of minutes.
	You're introducing the characters and the world that they live in.
	Call that fun and games.
	Then you've got some kind of a conflict or whatever.
	At one point, you're going to have what he calls the dark night of the soul.
	Where it looks like the protagonist of the movie is going to lose everything.
	There's no way that he can get this back.
	And then what happens is things turn around.
	And, you know, he winds up winning.
	And so the dark night of the soul is going to be the convention that is coming up.
	You're going to have this noise that's going to continue until the convention.
	And then what doesn't kill him is going to make him a lot stronger.
	And so, if and when...
	Biden emerges from this convention with all the stuff that's thrown against him.
	Again, remember, there's a lot, even though they can do whatever they want to in the Democrat Party, and the Democrats have been very totalitarian, authoritarian in the way they run things.
	They had the superdelegates, remember that, with Hillary Clinton?
	And it was going to swamp what the delegates were.
	Bernie would win in certain places, and she would wind up getting more delegates than he did.
	Because the superdelegates were picked by the party.
	And so they have always been more along those lines.
	But even though they have that ability to be able to remove a sitting president against his will, and then to replace him with what?
	A very, very weak vice presidential candidate.
	You know the people around him it's not so much Biden, but it's the Biden see They are capable of taking action against their enemies make no doubt about it And I think the Democrats understand that and you already had a lot of people who are Democrats who go on record Not anonymously criticizing Biden, but people who go on record to support him people like Federman and others and so I think that when he gets there, and if he was able to beat back all these people criticizing him
	And if he's able to they give him the real meds and he makes some kind of a speech or something you know he comes out with his dark Brandon chemicals and He comes back after this dark night of the soul, and he gets the nomination now He's ready to take on the real bully Donald Trump And they can all coalesce around him.
	That's how he can get those third of the people who want to remove him.
	That's how he can get his base to really like him.
	He could then, at that point, be the sentimental favorite with the Democrats.
	Oh, this poor old guy.
	And he's played that sentimental card in the past.
	Talking about his son who died and so forth.
	They will actually use that.
	And if he pulls this thing out, they'll go full-on establishment press and the Democrat Party to then change gears and to push him out as somebody who can do the job.
	And the debate, the final debate, is just three weeks after the DNC. Biden gets the drugs that he needs.
	He does great at the debate, or at least he can communicate.
	And he's the comeback kid.
	And then after the election, we have a January the 6th Part 2, don't we?
	And then we have a replacement after the election.
	And they can get rid of one or both of them.
	And then they can put in somebody who is more photogenic.
	Or maybe they just leave him there and have the usual Biden-C people running, someone like Lala.
	Of course, he's not going to be able to finish the second term.
	So they're already looking at that.
	And that's one of the reasons why Nuisance and Whitmer and others are hovering around like vultures over a corpse.
	Because they know that even if he makes it to the election, and even if he wins, he's not going to make it through four years.
	So of course I could be wrong.
	You know, Spielberg might not be directing this.
	Spielberg has been directing so much of all the stuff that he did.
	Spielberg, most recently, the D-Day appearance.
	It really is.
	Very much like Wag the Dog.
	I could be wrong.
	They could all just be greedy, power-mad idiots fighting amongst themselves.
	And we might just be in for total chaos in a clown show.
	But I kind of think there's a purpose behind it, because there are trillions of dollars in Washington.
	And even though Biden and the people around him at the White House, even though they may be just greedy clowns, there are people who are still greedy, but they're not clowns.
	We're looking at those trillions of dollars and figuring out how they can gain control of it so it can be sent to them.
	Those people are very smart, very cunning, very calculating.
	And those are the people who are ultimately the Biden see.
	And those people have a plan.
	And so I think it's going to be something like, who knows?
	You know, it could be some of these billionaires who want to become trillionaires.
	It could even be Lucifer himself.
	Who knows what they're going to do with all this stuff.
	Well, you know, and it's not just the DNC. It is also the RNC as well.
	Take a look at what's going to happen at the Republican convention.
	The next Republican Party platform will be written behind closed doors.
	They're not going to have an open floor debate about different policies, about things like abortion or whatever.
	They're just going to dictate it.
	This is an article from Semaphore.
	They're going to dictate it to people.
	You see, there's no pretense anymore of an election.
	There's no pretense of voting.
	There's no pretense of democracy.
	Not even for the delegates who go to the convention.
	Now, I've been to several political conventions with the Libertarian Party.
	You know, when I was going, I probably still is.
	It's carried by C-SPAN and things like that.
	It gets some mainstream media coverage.
	And there would always be an open floor debate about all kinds of things, including abortion.
	There was always a pro-life contingent within the Libertarian Party when I was there.
	And so there's always this platform.
	And people work really hard on the platform.
	And it's really kind of the purpose of people going as delegates.
	Because in many cases, certainly with the Republicans and Democrats, the nominee is usually a foregone conclusion.
	Now, at the Libertarian Convention, it wasn't.
	I mean, you had really no idea.
	There had been no primaries.
	And so the candidates who really were selected at the convention, the one just before the first one that I went to, they had Ron Paul and they had Russell Means.
	Who was head of the American Indian Movement.
	You saw Russell Means in Last of the Mohicans.
	And so they had two pretty strong candidates that were there.
	And so, you know, it was a bit of a fight between those two.
	And so, but typically, for the Republicans and the Democrats, the only thing that they really get a chance to really get engaged in is the platform.
	But of course, to Trump, issues don't matter.
	It's simply about him.
	Look at what they just did with Bob Good in Virginia.
	Bob Good was not a strong Trump critic, but he endorsed DeSantis.
	And for that treason...
	Because, you know, it's Trump. It's not the Constitution, but it's Trump you must be loyal to, or it's treason.
	For that treason, Trump came against him.
	You also had McCarthy come against him because, again, Bob Good, as head of the Freedom Caucus, Freedom Coalition, whatever they call it, they wanted to get McCarthy out.
	And so, both of them came against him.
	He narrowly lost by 300, but they're going to do a recount.
	Nevertheless, it's not about principles.
	It's not about conservatism versus populism or anything like that.
	It's simply about Trump.
	And so he's got his daughter-in-law there that's now in charge of the RNC, and they are going to decide what the platform is going to be behind closed doors.
	There will be no press coverage, and there will be no participation from the delegates that are there.
	The Democrat Party, on the other hand, is going to stream its platform negotiations.
	It's going to allow reporters to cover them, same way they did at the Libertarian Party.
	The RNC platform meetings used to have shows of committee members making arguments for amendments and language change in front of a large public audience.
	Oscar Brock, an RNC committee man from Tennessee, said the lack of transparency that they're planning, Is unwelcome.
	When people operate behind closed doors, you always have to wonder what the outcome is going to be.
	And you always have to wonder why.
	And so when you look at how heavily the RNC is controlled and the DNC is controlled, you look at these elections where there's no debates, there's no real primaries, this, folks, the lesson to take away from all this stuff Is that this is truly about, it's just a massive power play.
	And you don't have any role in it.
	Not even the people who go to the convention have a role in it.
	And who goes to the convention?
	It's the people who are party activists at the state level.
	This is about their small little clique.
	So you have the Biden Collective, and you've got the Trump Collective.
	We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back
	Music playing
	so
	liberty it's your move and now the david knight show all right and uh guard by the way is going to do tomorrow's fourth of july show We'll see about Friday whether that'll be a rebroadcast or whether Guard would like to do it.
	And we're going to have Tony on today, since we're not doing the Thursday show.
	So, looking forward to seeing what Guard is going to do with the 4th of July.
	And with American Independence, he's got that covered for sure.
	He could do that with his...
	Blindfolded and with his hands behind his back.
	So it'll be a good program, I know.
	And on RockFan, Brian and Deb McCartney, could you pray for Brian's family?
	His brother Doug passed away yesterday.
	He had dementia for almost 10 years and was only 63.
	I am so sorry.
	That is such a tragedy.
	I'm so sorry for your family.
	Well, we just pray that God would bless them, give them a...
	A confidence in the future, a confidence in God's kindness and mercy, and a confidence that this is not the end, but a separation, and that they'll see Him better than they've ever seen Him.
	So, I need to straighten my tie.
	Let's see. Is that the right way?
	We got a... Okay.
	All right. Well, it's pulled over to the side here.
	How's that?
	Okay, we're good.
	We got a straight tie.
	Yeah, I get these interesting notes from that.
	But yes, we do pray for them.
	And that is a very young age to have that happen.
	You know, we look at, again, the martyrs, the victims that they try to portray with their political persecution, and it has been a political persecution, against Trump, against Bannon.
	And, of course, I don't really see them as somebody who is fighting for a cause.
	Biden, not Biden, Bannon says that he's fighting for a cause.
	I think what he's trying to do is cause a civil war.
	I don't think he's got a cause.
	Tell me what the policies are that he wants.
	What are the reforms that he wants?
	What is his vision of a just society?
	Sorry I haven't seen it. It's simply about him and about Trump and about their personal vendettas.
	Don't get drawn up in another one of these January the 6th scams that Steve Bannon and Trump and all the rest of the people around them are trying to push out there.
	Don't follow those idiots.
	And they are idiots.
	They are idiots. But there are some real martyrs that you should be paying attention to.
	And that's the people who are going to jail because they tried to stop mothers from killing their babies.
	Think about the fact.
	This occurred to me this morning.
	I've not said this before, but it occurred to me.
	You've got people in Tennessee.
	We just had a sentencing for one of the group in Tennessee.
	They've been found guilty.
	Facing long terms in prison.
	We'll tell you what the first sentence was when we come up to it.
	But think about this. Some of these are in D.C. and some of them were in Tennessee.
	Now, in Tennessee, they are facing federal prison terms because they stood outside an abortuary.
	I think that's the best way to describe this.
	It's one of the people that is in prison.
	public and he used that term I think that's really the way we ought to talk about it's a killing center an abortuary but these people who were there at the abortuary whatever they did whatever they did where they quietly talked to mothers or whether they blockaded this clinic that so-called clinic that abortuary is now illegal in Tennessee and yet the federal government is going
	to send these people to prison for blocking something that is illegal something that has been shut down by the state government How do you justify that?
	They don't have any authority.
	The federal government doesn't have any authority to protect an illegal clinic in Tennessee.
	That's absolutely outrageous that they would do that.
	And I had not thought about that before this morning, but it occurred to me this morning.
	Anyway, an op-ed piece on LifeSite News, an article from one of the jailed rescuers, John Henshaw.
	You know, the left-wing media wants America to think that the elderly, pro-life grandmothers are violent criminals.
	They're not violent criminals, but they shut down, they were there to shut down what is now a criminal organization.
	A criminal activity.
	So, he's one of the DC-9.
	And this is what he said in his article.
	Believe it or not, it's possible to enjoy hearty laughs while one is locked up unjustly in federal custody.
	Especially when we have some limited access to news from the outside.
	As usual, the hypocrisy and the foibles of politicians, as well as the corrupt media's attempts at cover-up, provide the hilarity.
	I've had people criticize me in the past, right?
	How dare you laugh about this stuff, as dark as it is?
	Well, I think that's the appropriate way to laugh at this darkness.
	I think we should laugh at the darkness.
	Especially for Christians.
	God looks at these people.
	He laughs in derision.
	Shouldn't we? And that's what he's doing in prison.
	He said, what helps the humor is the palpable frustration of the fake news media demonstrates when they have to lie some more and try to ride to the rescue of our new pro-abortion police state.
	And again, think about this.
	The federal government locking people up Because they protested at what is now a criminal offense, a murder location.
	He says, when they do, the laughs are constant.
	So he said, what happened recently was the sentencing of our four pro-life grandmothers to prison sentences of two to three years, which, considering their age and their health condition, could easily be life in prison.
	They may die in prison in two or three years.
	They're elderly, they're in poor health.
	Here's an example. Heather Adani has diabetes.
	Thanks to the negligence of our federal custody and our judge, Colleen Collar Cotley, she was not given treatment.
	This caused her to have a stroke resulting in vascular surgery around her heart all the time while she was in jail and custody.
	Then there's Jean Marshall, who suffers from acute pain in her hip and had a hip replacement surgery scheduled for after our trial last year.
	Everyone assured us that she would have time after our trial before we had to report to prison.
	Standard operating procedure in federal cases.
	But our fanatical judge, while admitting that she lacks discretion, saw the opportunity to attack her.
	Protectors of children.
	And ordered immediate incarceration.
	Not giving her time between the sentencing and its beginning.
	Remember, you know, we had Bannon who was sentenced.
	And it went for quite some time before we had to report to jail.
	But no, we've got to put that grandmother in right now.
	I can't let her have any hip surgery.
	And as anybody who has had that situation or knows somebody who has, that is incredibly painful.
	This immediate incarceration was unexpected because it's never been done, and so Jean was unable to get the necessary surgery, nor was any accommodation offered at sentencing.
	Joan Bell has not communicated any current health concerns, but it's known that she's been hospitalized at least once in the last three years.
	This brings us to the last, most outrageous sentencing act, which people have still not stopped talking about, and that is Paulette Harlow, who suffers from diabetes, from spinal three years. This brings us to the last most outrageous sentencing act which people have still not stopped talking about and that is Paulette Harlow who suffers from diabetes, from spinal stenosis, from bronchial asthma, from fatty liver disease, from arthritic neck and hip, from short-term memory loss and other ailments. Her husband pleaded on behalf on her behalf in court saying
	that he feared for her life. Paulette's sentence of two years in prison not home confinement demonstrates cruelty on top of injustice. Cruelty being a category of acting hatred.
	What can be said for this judge?
	When the judge then capped Paulette's sentencing with a snide, mocking comment about her Catholicism, what she said was, well, you're all about saving life, so maybe you need to try to save your own, something to that effect. He said, we all saw the aging, fanatical baby boomers' selfish commitment to abortion.
	But Judge Collar Cotley deserves her own article, which I'll give her next week.
	So I'll leave her alone at this point.
	But he says, now I apologize for all this detail.
	He said, the recitation of ailments afflicting us elderly.
	He said, did I mention my trick knee?
	Just kidding. He says, it's dreadfully boring.
	But he said, don't worry because another news article has come along to liven up this narrative.
	Paulette's sentencing has enraged fair-minded people and has not stopped resounding online on Fox News and on conservative talk radio now for several weeks, which gets us closer to our enjoyment.
	Now here in jail, we suffer from fake news associated press as our only news source.
	Can you imagine? If the associated propaganda, propaganda associated with the government, Can you imagine if the AP was your only news source?
	Anyway, but knowing the media so well, I'm able to detect their lies and bias rather easily.
	Knowing that people are still talking about a 75-year-old woman sent to jail with serious health issues, I saw a headline on AP about fake news stories last week.
	And the laughter began.
	Fake news AP telling me about fake news?
	Funny. But after initially ignoring it, I began to suspect that there was treasure there.
	Sure enough, the second fake news story from an upset reporter, Melissa Golden, was that people think the 75-year-old woman was outside the abortuary.
	And he said, that's not her word, that's his word.
	Golden wants us to know that the grandmother invaded the abortuary and committed violence.
	To use those two terms, invaded and violence.
	These ailing grandmothers are anything but what they seem.
	Golden is seen as leaping tall buildings in a single bound, wrestling police to the ground, apparently.
	She supposedly invaded the partial birth abortuary of Cesar Santangelo.
	Once inside, I can only assume that their musculature must have frightened the abortuary staff into assaulting them with a weapon.
	And this assault, which did happen by the staff, was admitted in court, and it was justified by the judge and by this AP reporter.
	So again, you heard the condition.
	Of these women. Especially Paulette's condition.
	And we're supposed to believe that they invaded and got violent?
	No, the violence was on the side of the staff.
	This July, he says, we will see our brothers and sisters in Tennessee sentenced.
	Ms. Golden should get great enjoyment in the sentencing of an elderly concentration camp survivor to prison in her last days.
	I can already see the headline.
	America completes the Nazi design.
	And so again, when we look at this in Tennessee, these clinics that they were at are now shut down.
	And so we've got the very first verdict from one of these Tennessee people.
	Paul Vaughn, the guy who homeschooled his kids, whose house was raided in the early morning by the FBI, What the FBI has become.
	Again, we've known this for a long time.
	Now, the FBI began with the Palmer raids, made J. Edgar Hoover famous.
	They're supposed to make Palmer president, but instead, J. Edgar Hoover got his little fiefdom and empire, and he ran it in an absolute criminal way his entire life.
	But now, they don't bother to do the kinds of PR that he did.
	He always made people think that they were the saviors.
	They were out there fighting organized crime and Russian spies and all the rest of this stuff.
	But no, they've dropped that pretense now.
	A Tennessee husband and pro-life father of 11 was sentenced to three years of supervised release.
	And everybody is very relieved about that.
	Yesterday, In connection with a 2021 demonstration at the abortion facility in Tennessee, and so we can all be thankful that he's not going to jail.
	I'm sure he is as well.
	He had faced more than a decade behind bars.
	A father of 11.
	Homeschooling father of 11.
	Vaughn said that he rejoiced in God's plan for the sentence he received from the court.
	He still looks forward to appealing the verdict.
	He said, laws have to be grounded in truth.
	They have to align with the ultimate lawgiver who is Christ our Lord, he said.
	He's absolutely right. And we'll talk a little bit more about that.
	Vaughn's sentence comes five months after a federal jury in January convicted him and five other activists, each of a misdemeanor charge of violating the FACE Act, as well as a felony charge of conspiracy against rights.
	You see, the FACE Act was there, and it was a misdemeanor.
	But this criminal Biden-C, the Biden Collective...
	Has enforced this now and added a felony charge of conspiracy against rights.
	What's the Republican Party doing about this?
	Absolutely nothing.
	Nothing at all.
	Machiavelli and Mike, you know, this Christian Speaker of the House, not doing anything about this.
	Nothing at all. A total of six other demonstrators who showed up to the so-called clinic in Nashville, Tennessee, which is now shut down as a criminal operation, were indicted and eventually convicted of similar charges.
	They have not been sentenced yet.
	A few things make Vaughn stand out from the other demonstrators.
	He was the only Tennessee resident.
	The others were from out of state.
	Secondly, Vaughn has insisted that his activism consisted solely of prayer, singing, and sidewalk counseling, trying to convince pregnant mothers walking into an abortion facility to choose life, as well as advising police on the intentions of the demonstrators who planned to be peacefully arrested.
	But the Department of Justice, so-called, out of Washington, run by the Biden Collective, Has maintained that the group conspired together to block women's access to the abortion facility.
	Gallagher and Edom used social media to organize the demonstration at the Tennessee facility.
	Their plan was to arrive at the abortion center before it opened and begin live streaming their activities, which included blocking the entrance, according to the Department of Justice.
	The abortuary was located inside a medical building containing several other tenants.
	Vaughn said he and members of his counseling team gathered in the hallway outside the abortuary to sing hymns and to talk to women before they went in.
	He admits that he was there, but he had no intention of blocking the door to the clinic or of getting arrested.
	However, Gallagher announced on a video livestream that he intended to lead what the group characterized as a rescue, and that anyone who didn't plan on being arrested should not in any way block the entrance to the clinic.
	Vaughn said at this point he decided to act as a go-between for the demonstrators and the police.
	While he had no plans to block the clinic himself, he tried to explain the demonstrators' plans to the police and to ensure that the arrests were peaceful.
	So they're going to block this, and they're not going to do anything.
	Just please arrest them peacefully.
	He told the press in February that he almost did not attend the pro-life demonstration.
	His wife was soon due to have their 11th child, but he ultimately chose to show up at the abortion facility.
	I don't see how people who do this job, who cover the news, who know...
	What the plans have been for a long time with the germ games.
	You know about FEMA and the plans for using an emergency to set up medical martial law and all the rest of the stuff.
	How in the world could they tell people this is 4D chess?
	How could they cover for Trump in doing this stuff?
	I just don't understand that.
	I still don't understand it.
	If you see something happen and you know it and these people knew it and you lie to somebody because you want audience, you want fame and you want following and all the rest of the stuff and you want fortune, You do that, that's a real problem with you and God.
	He said, I didn't get arrested that day at all.
	He said, I was never charged in local court for any crime.
	Like I said, I had a great relationship with the police.
	But then, a year and a half later, just after 7 a.m.
	in the morning on a Friday, in October 2022, he was arrested.
	He said he was preparing to take four of his children to a homeschool co-op, When he heard banging on the door of his farmhouse, he saw flashing lights outside and heard, FBI, open up!
	So, that's when the ordeal began.
	And we've all talked about that in the past.
	You know, an FBI SWAT team raid on a homeschooling Christian father who had not done anything to block the clinic and putting his children at risk as well.
	The Face Act.
	Signed into law in 1994 by Bill Clinton.
	An election year, of course.
	Doing this to...
	As an offering to his pro-child murdering Democrat Party.
	The FACE Act prohibits anyone from intentionally injuring, intimidating, or interfering with a person who is attempting to obtain or provide, quote, reproductive health services.
	It's not about reproducing, is it?
	By using force, threat of force, or physical obstruction.
	Now, you know, 1994, that was the year that Newt Gingrich did his contract with America.
	Had a big win.
	You know, that was a midterm, the first midterm for Bill Clinton.
	And usually, after the president gets in, usually the opposing party wins big in the midterm.
	And boy, they won really big in 1994.
	They had a contract with America.
	It didn't have anything to do about protecting babies or stopping abortion.
	You know, I ran against, and she's still in Congress, Virginia Fox in North Carolina.
	Ran against her in 1996.
	My contract with America was the Bill of Rights.
	But, you know, it was interesting for me as I ran for Congress and actually was in a televised debate, not with Virginia Fox.
	As soon as she got in, she didn't want to have any more debates.
	Sound familiar? But I was there with another third-party candidate who didn't know anything.
	She was from this group of cultists in the North Carolina mountains, transcendental meditation people.
	They call them the flying swamis.
	They get in a trance and they would hop around with their legs crossed and say they were flying, you know, that type of thing.
	Anyway, she had no idea about what any of the issues were.
	We got on NPR, and there was a Democrat who wound up getting, I think, 20% of the vote.
	And so it was heavily Republican district.
	But when I ran, and it wasn't just in that debate, but I did a lot of radio interviews and things like that, and abortion came up.
	And at first I was taking the libertarian line.
	It's something that I'd never had to think about from a personal standpoint.
	It's something that the church that I'd always been in never really talked about any political aspects of anything.
	And so I just looked at it like, you know, well, it's for people to decide what they want to do.
	And then I had an epiphany because that was right about that time that they did the FACE Act was when they began with a partial birth abortion.
	At that point in time, this, you know, distant issue that I'd only tangentially thought about was, Told, well, you know, we don't know exactly when life begins, so we'll leave that up to the mothers to decide that.
	I realized with partial birth abortion, that that was a lie.
	That they were willing to take full-term babies and murder them.
	And that was the beginning of the change.
	So, anyway, the...
	Signed into law in 1994, and Gingrich and his mob didn't do anything to stop it.
	But of course, it was a misdemeanor.
	It's the Biden administration that has turned this into a felony by adding in conspiracy charges.
	Conspiracy charges. So, earlier this year, Vaughn told the press, this is the world that is interviewing him, that any prison sentence, particularly the maximum sentence of more than 10 years, would have had a devastating impact on his wife and his 11 children.
	But he said, after this sentencing, he said, but the grace of God is greater.
	And if he wants me to have a jail ministry, and I get to share with people that are incarcerated, that have no hope, then I will be his obedient servant.
	But fortunately, that's not going to happen.
	But we look at, this is from Breitbart, they have Marvel's She-Hulk star.
	Put the star in air quotes there.
	And who is this person?
	I'll do a Jiminy Glick.
	This is by...
	Who is this? Tatiana Maslany, I guess.
	It's this person, the She-Hulk.
	I have to check my notes, just like Jiminy Glick.
	I'm supposed to care what she thinks about mother and father relationships with their children, that parents should not be allowed to control how a child identifies their gender?
	What a joke.
	She-Hulk is streaming.
	Yeah, we could say that it is a streaming pile of excrement.
	Just like all the rest of the Disney Plus stuff.
	I'm sure it's on Disney Plus because it's Marvel and they bought that franchise.
	She's attacking parents who refuse to accept their children's pronouns.
	After they've been gaslit in the schools that the parents were foolish enough to send their kids to.
	She said parents should not be allowed to, quote, control how a child identifies.
	No, that's the work of Disney Plus and this She-Hulk actress.
	They should help the kids identify as to what they want to do.
	She was getting an award in Canada, and so she thought that entitled her to pontificate.
	About what she thinks how parents no longer apply.
	She went on to insist that children have rights and that parents do not have any rights over their children.
	This has been around for the longest time.
	I've played you the videos that I did back with the parental rights movement about 15 years ago, I guess.
	And it was the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was never signed in the United States, but of course, you know, just like the Paris Climate Accord or any of these other things, they enact it by judges and by schools and by their actions.
	They act as if it has been ratified when it hasn't been.
	The United States is the only country that has not ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
	They will do it subversively.
	And this is exactly what it's all about.
	And this is what she says.
	Children have rights.
	Children are human beings who have knowledge and who know themselves.
	They know about all of this stuff.
	These young kids, they should be able to mutilate themselves.
	They're minors.
	They may know about alcohol and things, but we don't let them have alcohol, do we?
	The only thing my six-year-old nephew knows is that he'd like to be Godzilla or King Kong.
	Either one is fine. Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	And of course, I've had sons who identified as...
	Travis used to identify as Michael Jordan.
	My other son used to identify as Batman, just like me.
	I just, you know... Again, the video that I played for you a couple of weeks ago.
	Here's a stack of cash, and here is an Oreo cookie.
	Which one do you want? I'll take the question.
	Are you sure you want the Oreo cookie?
	Yeah, okay, well, that's their decision, you know.
	They have their rights. I should not interfere with those choices.
	So, yeah, she says, children have rights.
	Children are human beings who have knowledge and who know themselves.
	Do they? And we should be taking cues from them.
	Let me tell you something. These adult actresses don't know themselves.
	The adult Navy SEAL who didn't know himself.
	I mean, to be fair, when you look at how awful they are, would you want to know them either?
	No. Don't want to look in the mirror there either, do they?
	So she said, listening to them, listening to the children, empowering them to know who they are and to name that, she said.
	That is their right, and it's not a parent's right.
	Well again, if you're going to say that children have rights and they don't, then you have to take those rights away from them.
	The parents. And then who is going to be their advocate?
	It'll be the government. It'll be the institution.
	Same things that they did with animal rights.
	Animals didn't have rights. But you've got the people who say that they do, and they become the advocates for the animals, and they make themselves as self-appointed guardians of them and tell you what to do.
	Well, in the UK, same thing is happening.
	They have a different acronym for a lot of this.
	They call it EDI. But this article in the Daily Skeptic, schoolchildren are being indoctrinated with hard-left ideology under the guise of teaching them to be inclusive.
	And of course, that has been going on for quite some time.
	We know that it is indoctrination.
	It is not education.
	They don't want people who are going to be able to think critically at all.
	But I wanted to leave you with this story, a hopeful story.
	And of course we are glad that the homeschooling father of 11, Vaughn, is not going to jail.
	We can all thank God for that mercy, that protection.
	But this is another story.
	From a country star, T. Graham Brown, who I have no idea who this guy is.
	I'll take the word for it, that he's a country star.
	It's not my genre of music.
	But anyway, he talked about something he said was a miracle to help him get away from addiction.
	What was a miracle? He said, well, I asked God to help me, and he did.
	Country star T. Graham Brown was always a believer in Jesus, he said, but over time he got sort of drifted away until a conversation with himself and God ushered in a real-life miracle.
	He's now 69.
	He says, as time went on, he found himself on the wrong path, struggling with addiction and with mental health issues.
	He said, but the chaos kept progressing.
	At one point, he was pouring vodka into his coffee in the morning.
	Just one of the signs that he was no longer in control.
	And eventually, it all came to a head.
	He said one morning, he said, and this is a cliche of a story.
	But I'd been trying to get sober.
	I'd get on the horse, and I'd ride for a while, then I'd fall off.
	I'd get on the horse, ride for a while, and fall off.
	I went to rehab, and that didn't help.
	It wasn't until Brown had an honest conversation with himself and the Lord one morning, around 14 years ago, that everything came together.
	He said, I think I was ready, and I can remember it like it was yesterday, he said.
	I looked in the mirror, and I actually talked to myself.
	And I said, man, what are you doing?
	You're about to blow everything.
	You need to straighten up and do something about this, man.
	You're smarter than this. But that wasn't all, he said.
	He also made a request of God.
	He said, and I asked God to help me.
	He said, you know, from that instant, I've not had one craving.
	Not one craving for alcohol.
	Bad enough that he was pouring it into his coffee in the morning.
	But he hasn't had any craving for it at all.
	Underscoring how incredible this development truly was, he said that he went from looking for a buzz around the clock to never even thinking about it.
	And he says, I've got to call that a miracle.
	In 1998, over a decade into his career, he made his first connection with a Christian audience when he released a song called Wine Into Water.
	And it detailed his struggles with alcohol.
	Now that song has been recorded by more than 100 artists, according to his biography.
	I should have got that and listened to.
	It's one I don't know.
	Again, I don't follow country music in general.
	And when Naomi Judd committed suicide, he went into an interview and he talked about that.
	He said, you know, she's a close friend of mine.
	And he remembered her.
	He said she was open about her mental health struggles.
	He said, I've been there. You go into this severe depression where, and I've sat there and I've looked at a pistol.
	And I've had those suicidal thoughts too, he said.
	But it all changed.
	You know, we try to make things really complicated sometimes with theology.
	It's really about a simple relationship.
	It's about getting honest with yourself, about getting honest with God.
	God sees your heart.
	And God can absolutely change you.
	Not leaving you as you are.
	Not addicted to alcohol or to sex or to money or to gambling or whatever it is.
	He sees that and he can change that.
	It's a very powerful thing.
	Oh, there we go. Got the song there.
	You've heard a multitude of prayers on my behalf And I pray one more is not too much text I've ratified this battle by myself.
	But it's a war that I can't win without your head.
	Tonight I'm as low as any man can go.
	I'm down and I can't fall much farther And once upon a time you turned the water into wine Now on my knees I'm turning to you father Could you help me turn the wine back into water?
	Nah, that's really good. That's really good.
	and from the heart.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Um...
	Let's take a look at what Klaus Schwab is doing.
	I was looking for that Davos clip, and I couldn't find it.
	I thought it was in the deck here.
	That's why we had a little bit of pause there.
	See if you can find it while I read this comment there.
	It's the Bond villain one that we did on Rumble.
	Paleo Armory says, been there?
	Doctors got me hooked on pain pills.
	Took me seven years to beat it.
	I lost everything twice.
	Being on probation and my first kid's birth saved my life.
	It was God's plan. Well, praise God.
	Praise God. Thank you for letting us know that.
	Well, we'll just move on with Klaus Schwab here.
	I thought that we had the Bond thing in the deck, but I guess we don't.
	I couldn't find it, and I don't think Travis can find it either.
	But they're having a summer Davos in China, of course, because China is the model.
	China has been the beta test for this technocracy for a very long time.
	It's one of the reasons why they're transferring everything to China as well.
	You know, China is not even bothering to do any reports about renewable energy.
	They could not care less about renewable energy.
	Why would they care about that?
	I mean, they're making most of the solar panels, and you would think, well, they've got a pretty good opportunity there to use these things profitably because they can get them at cost, right?
	But they're making the solar panels for the idiots in America and Europe who want to use this stuff on the grid.
	And I'm not saying that solar panels are for idiots.
	We've got solar panels. It's good to have it as a backup.
	It's good to get away from the grid, and we want to do more of it individually.
	solar panels and renewables and windmills Those are great to get off the grid, but it's absolute lunacy to do them on the grid Then you have to have these big battery energy storage sites and all the things that come with that and so The Chinese aren't foolishly doing that They need to have a lot of energy so they can be the manufacturing center of the world And so they're building coal power plants because that's cheap and they're not even doing anything to clean the air
	And they're not even reporting other renewable stuff.
	All of the Paris Climate Accord is about transferring industry and manufacturing away from America and Europe to China.
	And so that's where Klaus Schwab is.
	And so he was there, and he kind of opened this up talking about how They must, those people there, those globalists, those technocrats, must force humanity into the collaboration,
	right? At the same time, we are witnessing rapid technological advances with many opportunities and with artificial intelligence rapidly transforming our productions and our lives.
	It's going to be a shame to see this guy go.
	The forces of the revolution provide new opportunities for global prosperity and growth.
	All those factors will have a profound impact on the future of humanity, provided we are able to work together.
	To drive future economic growth, we must embrace innovation, And foster collaboration across sectors, regions, nations and cultures to create a more peaceful, inclusive, sustainable and resilient future.
	At this critical juncture, the active participation of all stakeholders is essential to ensure a sustainable development path.
	I'm delighted that close to 2,000 leaders from multiple sectors representing some 80 countries and regions have come to Dalyan for this year's meeting.
	Combined with a spirit of bold curiosity for the adventure ahead.
	Once a Nazi, always a Nazi, right?
	Yeah, they want to force humanity.
	You saw in that clip.
	Somebody put down there that little extract, how they're going to force humanity into doing what they want.
	We face major issues such as environmental challenges, right?
	Energy transformations and rising geopolitical tensions.
	Why? And social challenges.
	Why are those rising?
	Because of what they're doing to us.
	Because they're transforming our energy to nothing, to a net zero.
	He says things such as, excuse me, pandemics.
	Aging and widening income disparities as they take all the money for themselves, right?
	At the same time, we're witnessing the rapid technological advances with many opportunities for our lives and breakthroughs from the fourth industrial revolution.
	It's difficult to understand the difference between him when he talks about the fourth and the forced revolution.
	And of course, his fourth industrial revolution is a forced revolution, if there ever was one.
	And so then he went on to talk about new frontiers for growth.
	And that was their theme of this annual meeting.
	But actually, we've seen the things that he referenced there.
	We've seen these in depopulation articles in the past as well, as Wine Press points out.
	But let me play for you what he had to say about the new frontiers.
	The theme of this annual meeting is next frontiers for growth.
	But actually, what we have seen in the presentations, there are now limits to growth.
	Provided we use technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in a wise manner, as the Prime Minister of Vietnam said, in a human-centered way.
	Provided we take care of nature and see the green economy as a great opportunity for humankind and also for stimulating the economy.
	Provided also we fully exploit the innovational and entrepreneurial capability of the people sitting here in the room by forming the means of cooperation between governments and business.
	And finally, and most importantly, by working together on a global level, always being Aware that we are humanity with a shared destiny.
	In this respect, I invite you to join me in extending again our warm applause to Premier Li, President Duda and Prime Minister Fang Ming-Cheng.
	Yeah, there we go.
	Okay, so let's welcome these guys.
	I'm Mr. Duda, all the Duda day.
	Anyway, the wine press points out that the phrase that he used there, the limits to grog, it comes out of a...
	Club of Rome book that was published in 1972.
	The person who wrote that, Henry Meadows, is still around, and he's still pushing these depopulation ideas, just like Paul Ehrlich is still around.
	Paul Ehrlich wrote, He did.
	He's got a German name, but he's not German.
	He's American. But yeah, the population bomb.
	The idea that we've got to bomb the population.
	Really, that's what he was talking about.
	When he gave his speeches, and this is just before they began the environmental movement in 1970, the tail end of the 60s.
	And he said, we've got to reduce the population, drastically reduce the population.
	Now, he said, you know, different things can happen with it.
	And he goes, you could have a mass pandemic or something like that.
	But he says, even better is war.
	War is how you really reduce the population.
	So, his population bomb was really about bombing the population.
	And as this guy, Klaus Schwab, is talking about the next frontiers for growth.
	He also says that we've got limits to growth.
	And the limits to growth...
	The people around them, they've got to zero them out.
	So, again, in 2017, Meadows, who's still around, called for an 86% reduction in the world's population.
	He said that's for the greater good.
	He said that we could have a benevolent dictatorship that could accomplish this peacefully.
	To quote him, he said, we could have 8 or 9 billion people, probably.
	If we have a strong dictatorship, which is smart, People have a low standard of living now, but we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high standard of living, so we're going to have a billion people, not eight, not nine, and we're now at seven, so we've got to get back down.
	I hope this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience of being depopulated.
	But who knows?
	They may have to get tough with us.
	The dictator may not have to be so benevolent.
	So again, as Klaus Schwab is saying, we've got to force humanity into collaboration.
	Technocracy News...
	So this is classic technocracy, as defined in the Technocrat magazine in 1937.
	Technocracy News has put up, many times he's put up the 1930s kind of a cartoon description of what the technocracy was.
	And a really interesting publication that they ran for a period of time there.
	Again, it was Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldane, who tried to get rid of democracy openly in Canada and install a technocracy.
	They brought him up on charges.
	He didn't get convicted, but he got out of Canada and went to South Africa.
	That's why Musk is coming from there.
	But, you know, he's part of the technocracy world.
	The people who really bought into the ideas of Huxley and others.
	But according to what they said in the Technocrat magazine 1937, this is a quote from their magazine 1937, they really haven't changed.
	They said there will be no place for politics, for politicians, for finance or financiers, for rackets or racketeers.
	Technocracy will distribute by means of a certificate of distribution available to every citizen from birth to death.
	They will distribute assets to us.
	And, of course, The Shape of Things to Come, written by Huxley.
	And then... No, it was H.G. Wells who did it.
	They were all part of this thing.
	I get them confused. But I'm pretty sure it was H.G. Wells who did The Shape of Things to Come, and then they did the movie Things to Come.
	But of course, it was also, the Huxleys were very involved in it.
	Julian Huxley coined the term transhumanism.
	Technocracy was and is the only alternative economic system ever created from scratch.
	An indisputable fact.
	They mandated the removal of all politicians, substituting an org chart of appointed technocrats to run everything in society by fiat.
	And in that article, he shows the org chart there.
	A technate org chart, the technocracy study course, 1934.
	In one full sweep, technocracy intends to replace all politics, all economics, all religion with a scientific dictatorship.
	Historically, everybody saw through technocracy and they showered it with hate.
	Even the communists, the Marxists, and the fascists hated them.
	But of course, you know, you won't have the politicians or if they exist, they'll just be figureheads like Fauci.
	Figureheads like Trump and Biden who, you know, let Fauci and the so-called science run everything.
	Schwab's blunt language shows globalists are no longer hiding their agenda if only people would listen and take them seriously.
	Schwab made the declaration during his opening remarks at the Summer Davos.
	The annual meeting of new champions is what they officially call it.
	But it's taking place in China.
	He praised China for its economic policies.
	Seen by the globalists as the model of top-down, centralized planning in a high-tech surveillance state, run through smart cities, smart EVs, electrical vehicles, smart homes, smart appliances, smart meters, all that for stupid slaves.
	AI, digital IDs, CBDCs have one thing in common.
	They come with on-off switches not under the control of the end user, we the people.
	In their ideal world, we live as slaves.
	At the privilege of our masters, if we get down the line, they can cut off our electric power, electric car, electronic digital money, everything.
	Schwab told the elitist participants gathered in China that they must force humanity into a collaboration.
	Is it a collaboration if they force you?
	Isn't that contradictory?
	This is why he told his globalist comrades at a previous meeting over two years ago to expect an angrier world.
	Well, that's exactly right.
	It's collaboration in the same way you collaborate with a mugger when he pulls a gun on you.
	I think what he means more is cooperation with the force used.
	Yeah, yeah. Or to co-opt.
	Co-opt your liberties.
	And we've seen this all through the medical martial law.
	That globalist agenda.
	That's a globalist agenda. This idea, well, we're not forcing you.
	We're just coercing you.
	Meadows says he'd like to see a smart dictatorship run on the earth.
	This is the global technocracy that he's talking about.
	In which people's lives are ruled by scientists, engineers, and other experts, like Fauci, Rule, Trump, and Biden.
	Biden, anybody who believes that Biden is making his own decisions, as this one says, he is a Manchurian candidate.
	It's the Biden Collective that is running all of that, the Biden Sea.
	He is a Manchurian candidate, has been from day one, and because he's become senile to the point where his globalist handlers are no longer able to hide it, They're ready to replace him with a new puppet, and I think that's going to be after the re-selection that they have.
	The new puppet will be prettier, speak smoother.
	He or she will no more be in charge of his or her actions as president than either Biden or Trump were as they ran this stuff through.
	So, what do we...
	What do we look for in all this?
	And I think there's a very interesting article from the American Reformer at AmericanReformer.org.
	This is by Bill Peacock.
	He said, I think this is very useful.
	I've talked in the past about the doctrine of the lesser magistrate.
	That really is about decentralization, and Matt Tawela has put together a short, very quick read that gives a great survey of history, both secular and Christian, of how this has operated in the past.
	Very important for us to understand that.
	But in Bill Peacock's essay here, he says, think of this, he says, in all of creation, he goes back to a biblical foundation of this, he says, in all of creation, there's only one truly centralized government, that of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
	All sovereign authority rests in them and in no other.
	He has not kept the rest of us, however, from attempting to consolidate authority.
	God recognizes the wickedness of man's desire to gain power to himself and has often thwarted man's grasping for power while prescribing for us a decentralized form of civil government.
	He said the first hint of this came from Genesis 9.
	Where he said, whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed.
	Again, foreshadowing the idea of civil rulers who do not bear the sword in vain.
	And yet he points out men quickly abuse this God-given authority.
	When we look at Babel, the Tower of Babel, they said, Come, let us build a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.
	Again, disobeying God's command to be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.
	They didn't want to disperse and fill the earth.
	They wanted to centralize.
	They wanted to make this thing that was going to be competition to God.
	And so they disobeyed God's command to do that.
	and then God took action and dispersed them by dividing them against each other with language. There are several other examples in the Old Testament of God punishing those who sought to make a name for themselves through the centralization of power. Nebuchadnezzar's one, his kingdom reached to the ends of the earth. Babylonian king.
	He was made to eat grass, however, like an ox as soon as he proclaimed, Is not this great Babylon which I have built by mighty power as a royal residence and for the glory of my majesty?
	I guess just like Klaus, you know, maybe at some point in time Klaus will be forced by God to eat the bugs.
	Or maybe God will force Klaus, like Nebuchadnezzar, to eat the grass and fart like a cow.
	Who knows? Ha ha ha!
	We're going to stop it here.
	I'm going to pick up Tony's on the line here, and we're ready to have Tony.
	I don't want to keep him waiting. But I've got a lot more to say about the biblical aspects of decentralization and the importance of it.
	Before we go to break, Owen 61, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, thank you, David. Happy Fourth of July.
	It seems like yesterday that we were at the Bicentennial.
	Yeah. Time flies, and it goes faster and faster the older that we get, doesn't it?
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Okay.
	2nd of the pattern 3rd of the pattern
	4th of the pattern 5th of the pattern 6th of the pattern
	7th of the pattern 8th of the pattern 9th of the pattern
	10th of the pattern Making sense.
	Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, and joining us now is Tony Arterman of Wise Wolf Gold, and Tony has kindly set up davidknight.gold.
	He supports this program, and if you go there, that's a link to Tony, where you can get gold and silver, small or large.
	He can handle either one of those, and he's also done something not too many people have done.
	I don't know if anybody else has done it, actually.
	He's setting up a buying group, and you can, on a fixed amount each month, You can determine how many fiat dollars you want to convert into gold or silver, and he'll do that for you and get you the quantity discounts.
	He calls it Wolfpack. So joining us now is Tony Artvin.
	Coming up close to 4th of July, so I'll just wish you an early happy 4th.
	Well, happy 4th of July, my friend.
	I appreciate you having me on again.
	Well, thanks. Yeah, we can all hope that for a brighter year with perhaps more of a 4th of July environment to live in, although we might wind up getting the Revolutionary War is what we might wind up with, I think. Well, I mean, it's something, you know, I think that is underlying in the American character.
	Somewhere in there, I know very deep within us in our society is the same people that threw the tea in the harbor.
	Yeah. The same people that didn't want the, you know, the British Empire to rule over us without representation.
	Somewhere in there is the America that I love.
	Yeah. We always need to remember that.
	It's not just backyard barbecues and fireworks and things like that.
	There's a reason we celebrate this independence, and we need that spirit today.
	That's right. And that's what they want to replace.
	They want to replace the remnant of those people that still care about that, still have that spirit in them.
	And while tomorrow we'll be talking about, I guess, what happened in...
	In 1776, there was an interesting article on Zero Hedge from Michael Meharry.
	What happened in 1971?
	You talked about that many times, of course.
	What happened in 1971?
	But it's an interesting article, isn't it?
	Yeah, absolutely. There was actually two articles this last 24 hours on Zero Hedge, and I brought both of them here to bring up because they flow together.
	They're not really related, but the Epoch Times put out an article that says, In the study by YouGov, Americans said they need to make $186,000 on average to feel financially secure more than twice the $79,209 the Census Bureau reported to the average full-time worker made in 2022.
	So you can see, you know, just society-wide, people are, the dollar's losing purchasing power.
	This is because of inflation.
	And we'll talk about, you know, WTF, what happened in 1971, that website that's out there that Michael Meharry put out.
	But it says, the end of the article says, And he's talking about some bullet points of what did happen in 1971.
	What happened at that break in history?
	He said African-American incomes virtually stopped catching up to white incomes in 1971.
	Median male income has flatlined compared to real GDP per capita since 1971.
	The number of two-income families has surged since 1971.
	Price inflation has surged since 1971.
	A can of Campbell's tomato soup has undergone significant shrinkflation since 1971.
	And housing prices have skyrocketed since 1971.
	Now, two things happened.
	You were playing Klaus Schwab earlier, our modern-day, real-life Bond villain.
	The World Economic Forum...
	It was founded in 1971.
	And of course, we talk about this all the time, but it's probably the most important story, I think, of the last hundred years.
	That is going off the gold standard.
	Richard Nixon removing the gold linkage to our currency, closing the gold window on August 15, 1971.
	And everything that follows...
	And again, this is kind of the magic trick that we...
	We talk about, and just for a side note, you were talking about the Tower of Babel and nation, tongue, and tribes.
	And when I was in Iraq, in northern Iraq, there was, supposedly, they took us to the site of Nimrod's palace where there was, like, the Tower of Babel.
	That's where that's supposedly, right?
	This is what one of the scholars there was done.
	This is the site of the Tower of Babel.
	And I was reading years later, I would read Joseph P. Farrell's Babylon's Banksters, And, uh, supposedly the Rothschild family believes they stem from Nimrod, like they come from the line of Nimrod, which is kind of really weird.
	It all flows back to the same kind of mindset of creating this, you know, one world government, new world order, all that stuff, the world economic forum people.
	That's what, that's where they're That's where they're raised on debt.
	That's their whole reason, right, for everything that they do.
	Yeah, most normal people, if they thought they were descended from Nimrod, they would not want to talk about it.
	It's something of a reveal that they would say it or even want it to be true, you know?
	Well, and again, the reason I bring that up is because all these things, you know, they flow together.
	There is an underlying what they call Babylonian money magic.
	You call it the magic money tree for the modern monetary theory.
	The consequences of that is all the fake and the corruption and everything, but it starts with the economic consequences of taking out the middle class, and that's what we've seen.
	There was another report out in the last day that the trade deficit for the United States is as large as it's been since 2022, and it's growing.
	Well, again, these things are...
	Really, just the same consequence of removing all checks and balances from our currency and then the free-floating of it all, the moving of manufacturing, all that since 1971.
	It's been catastrophic.
	A lot of people are...
	I was listening to an interview with Peter Schiff, and he was talking about people are trying to set up their retirements.
	You know, he's like, if you're saving dollars, you're not going to retire.
	Your money is. Your paper currency is going to retire.
	I thought that was a good line because that's really what's happened.
	I think it's caught a lot of people by surprise.
	If you go back and look at the first article I was talking about, the three and four Americans, The older generation is the one that's actually a lot more skeptical because they've lived through, I think, different times and said, wow, this is something clearly wrong with this.
	The younger generation says, well, it's bad right now, but I think I can get out of this.
	Well, no, you can't.
	I mean, unfortunately, if you do the same things and you practice the same kind of financial, you know, if you have the same financial disciplines as your parents, you will lose.
	You know, Robert Kiyosaki says that...
	Savers are losers, and you clearly are in this paper currency downturn that we have, this fiat currency.
	Yeah, it is interesting, as Michael Meharry says, he was talking about what happened in 1971.
	The reason he mentioned it was because he said that there's a website that went up.
	The website is called WTF Happened in 1971.
	He says he's got 75 charts posted.
	One of them, Travis, see if you can pull it up.
	It's the one that's labeled, it's from Fred, and it shows the 50-year decline in wages as a share of the economy's total income.
	And it is straight down the trend line.
	It absolutely is amazing.
	And I think that pretty much says it all, that real wages have just gone straight down.
	Because, and it's really, you talk about the evisceration of the middle class, Tony, it's inflation, isn't it?
	That's the key weapon.
	Right, because it's hidden itself.
	And for a long time, I think, you know, they managed it quite well after the shock of the 1970s, inflation shock with Paul Volcker.
	And you could see, like, through the 1980s and 90s, David, you lived through this, gold was pretty flat.
	You know, it didn't move a lot.
	I think they were able to, with, you know, economists like Art Laffer and all those, they just really put a lot of emphasis on Wall Street.
	There was a growing stock market and all the rest.
	You had the 90s with the dot-coms.
	But really, that's all come crashing down, and everything that's built into the system is debt.
	You know, the debt of the U.S. in 2000, David, was $5 trillion.
	By 2010, it was $10 trillion.
	And, of course, we know the story.
	You go to 2020, you know, and it's 20-plus trillion.
	Now it's 30-plus trillion. It's $34.5 trillion.
	And we talk about this every week, but it's growing by a trillion dollars every 100 days.
	So you're this massive acceleration in debt to GDP. And all these things are unsustainable.
	And it really doesn't matter what the stock market's doing.
	If you recall, Venezuela, during the crash of their currency and the implosion of their economy, their stock market was doing great.
	And I think some people are taking away the same numbers here, looking at our stock market and what's happening on Wall Street.
	That's the only metric that Trump cares about, you know, because he wants to please Wall Street.
	So how's the stock market? See how great the stock market was?
	See how we pumped it up? But what people don't see is that debt that's there, it's covered over by the reserve status of the dollar.
	And that's now a phantom, you know, that's a dead man walking right now, the dollar's reserve status.
	And when that... It disappears completely.
	That's when we're going to see the effect of that massive debt come home to all of us.
	So it's sitting there. It's like this sort of Damocles over our head, and the Saudis have been gnawing at that rope, and it's about to drop on us, I think.
	Well, you're absolutely right. And what's funny about that is Trump used, when he ran in 2015-2016, that candidate Trump was totally opposed to the, he thought the stock market was inflated.
	You know, you talked about the Fed overreach and needing to audit the Fed and even talked about gold-backed currency, all that stuff.
	And that's completely out the window.
	And you're Sword of Damocles is absolutely right.
	And the strange thing that you and I have discussed with the loss of the petrodollar, which made almost no headlines, and it's bizarre that that wasn't earth-shattering news, because it actually is.
	Once the world figures out that they don't have to use dollars, and when there's another available system, especially with the BRICS nations, It's unlikely that BRICS really will create some sort of dominating, competing currency to oppose the United States.
	But I think what they will do is they're going to create payment systems where they can trade amongst themselves and other friendly nations that want to trade with them.
	And I think that's what's really going to bring the dollar to its knees.
	That's what's going to create the dollar collapse.
	You and I both know the mismanagement of our country.
	The only reason that we've been able to get away with it is the sheer stupidity.
	And of course, I think most of it's on purpose in this controlled demolition.
	I think one of the reasons we're able to get away with it is because the world uses dollars and there's a demand for them.
	Even with the Saudis ending the petrodollar agreement on June 9th, 80% of all the petroleum that's purchased through the energy systems and markets is done in dollars.
	Well, that's slowly going away as we've seen the usage of dollars, you know, the collapse of the usage of dollars over the last 20 years has gone from 75% Of usage in dollars around the world in financial transactions to the low 40s.
	We're going to see a continued decline in that, David.
	Those dollars will come home.
	They'll be repatriated.
	This is what the economist Robert Triffin talked about in the 1960s.
	It's known as Triffin's dilemma.
	When you lose the world's reserve currency status, the repatriated currency.
	We're inside a real lifetime experiment.
	Going back to the website that Meharry brought up, and I've heard about it before, but it's interesting.
	A lot of the economists at the time, David, they believed that the only thing propping up the price of gold was the dollar.
	They thought it was the inverse.
	They thought that if you took the dollar off the gold standard, that the price of gold would drop and nobody would want it.
	That's the kind of people that make it to the upper echelons of Washington, D.C. That's funny.
	You talk about the day, the Triffin's dilemma made me think of when I was a very young child, I think it was before I started school, they had a movie they were really hyping, a science fiction movie called Day of the Triffids.
	And they even handed out like sunflower seeds as like triffid seeds and stuff like that.
	And so I was really eager to go see that film, but it was absolutely not.
	But, you know, it makes me think the day of the Triffins, I guess, is coming.
	It's going to be like an invasion from outer space and the wreck to the economy.
	You know, we talk about Wall Street.
	And so, you know, what does Wall Street think about gold?
	Well, they had a survey.
	525 North American investors that they do on a regular basis.
	Six years ago when they surveyed them, 69% of them owned gold.
	Now, the most recent survey, that's gone up to 85%.
	So they're hedging in terms that they're only holding gold.
	I mean, they're still investing in the stock market.
	And other things, perhaps Bitcoin or whatever, but they are still, you've now got 85% of them have some gold.
	And that's the same thing the central banks are doing, of course, as we always talk about, how they're accumulating gold.
	And I think it's going to be not bricks.
	It's not going to be Russia and China.
	As you point out, it's going to be the...
	They're going to create an alternative system to SWIFT and other things like that so they can actually do trading.
	But I think everybody, including Russia and China, I think everybody's going to be trying to go to this Bank of International Settlements project, Rialto, their central bank digital currency thing that they're in the process of implementing.
	Well, I think you're right, and that's why I believe that central banks are buying so much gold.
	This is breaking the record since the 1950s.
	If you recall, at the end of 2009, the rate of central bank gold buying was near zero.
	They did not buy gold.
	Their holdings had been pretty stagnant for the previous decades, but now that's...
	Absolutely off the charts, accelerated.
	There is going to be a currency reset.
	That's why they call it that. They floated that.
	The term is the Great Reset.
	They put that out there all the time.
	There's going to be a reset of all valuation and currencies and commodities.
	And I think the loser will be the U.S. dollar for sure.
	That's that system.
	You know, it's funny. Biden's about as old as the...
	As the Bretton Woods Agreement and the end of World War II, that turning 80 years ago, and that's what we're looking at.
	It's really, I think, a great representation of the faltering of what they call the liberal New World Order that they set up, and the dollar's part of that.
	So there will be, I think, with the sanctions and everything, we've accelerated all this The power moves that happened, you know, all great powers come to an end.
	All empires decline. We know that through history.
	But all of our moves have been accelerated by either sheer stupidity or sabotage.
	You know, when we talk about weaponizing the dollar, you know, 40 different sanctions on 36 different countries.
	David, we've alienated so much of the rest of the world with our financial system.
	We've made it very complicated.
	We've made it very risky.
	uh... you look at uh... what happened to russia's assets uh... you know they were being redistributed uh... and i think gleefully by europe and uh... in the united states redistributed to ukraine so these are acts of war that are going on and we talked about you know a couple weeks ago we talked about the the uh...
	the tariffs uh... you and i are both people that agree with that and i think in theory or even in practice uh...
	but not this time I think these are weird things that are happening, these tariffs that they want to put on both Trump and Biden.
	So the system itself is being rejected.
	And that's why it's important for people to understand, you know, you're talking about holding dollars, what happened since 1971, what's it going to look like in the next five to ten years.
	You know, well we can see that the loss of purchasing power is real.
	I'm not watching gold go up, folks.
	I'm watching your dollar lose purchasing power.
	Predicting the price of gold is kind of silly.
	And I know that fortunes can be made on this.
	I don't really play the markets that way.
	I buy for the long term.
	I invest in my business.
	I don't really play the markets.
	You can do well.
	I know people that do. But I really look at this as an inverse chart of the more the government goes into debt, which they will, and they're going to increase.
	That's the only solution that they have is to print their way out of their disasters.
	And so the money supply will increase.
	The purchasing power will wane.
	And commodities like gold, like silver, things like Bitcoin, I believe, and in real estate and other things will hold value while the dollar declines.
	So this is the era of declining value for fiat currency.
	This experiment, I think, is I don't think I wouldn't say coming to an end, but we're reaching a reckoning.
	Yeah, absolutely. You were saying Biden is about as old as Bretton Woods, I guess, channeling Monty Python, this kind of voodoo witchcraft that they're doing.
	When they tested to see if this woman was a witch, they decided she was made of wood.
	Maybe that's Biden's issue.
	Maybe he's made of wood. But I don't think that this whole thing is, the currency is not going to be able to float too much longer.
	And we've got Nigeria is planning to bring their gold reserves home.
	They don't trust the U.S. dollar anymore.
	And they specifically said that to, quote, mitigate risks associated with a weakening U.S. economy.
	And they don't, you know, compared to the big countries like the U.S. and China who have thousands of tons of gold, they've got 21 tons of gold.
	But whatever they've got, they want to keep it.
	They don't want to have it in dollars.
	They don't want to lose it. So they're going to have a gold repatriation.
	And we saw some of this stuff happening recently.
	A few years ago, some of this stuff began where you started having some countries say, you know, I'd like to get my gold back that you say that you're holding for me.
	And this is trickling down even to small countries like Nigeria.
	Well, they want a place at the table, and the place at the table is going to be secured by gold in the 21st century.
	The era of fiat currency, the era of the reign of king dollar is coming to an end.
	So, yeah, you better get out.
	You better fly away from that system.
	You know, I really subscribe.
	I have no real tangible evidence to say this, but some of the journalism that's gone on at Kitco and other places that I've researched...
	I think China actually has more gold reserves than the United States.
	I really do believe that.
	We haven't displayed our gold reserves.
	We haven't had a real accounting since the 1950s.
	Supposedly, we have somewhere around upwards of 8,000 tons or so.
	There's been some great journalism that's gone on and showed the...
	By the way, this is real.
	The Chinese bought gold off the books beginning in this century.
	They started buying gold in massive quantities off the books.
	Now, why would a country secretly buy gold?
	You'll notice every once in a while, Zero Hedge and others will publish an article, somebody bought all this gold, and then it'll trace back to, it'll be a holding company that goes back to the Chinese government.
	The Chinese are buying gold at a rapid clip.
	So I think this has already begun, the scramble to get gold.
	And what has hamstrung the United States is that being the world's reserve currency, it's actually, once it went off the gold standard, it's actually at war with gold.
	If it buys gold, it decreases the supply, the price goes up, it has to readjust everything.
	And I think that's just a dangerous game.
	And again, they... This is pretty clear in evidence, you know, whether it's the bullion exchanges and the central banks working together to kind of, you know, sleight of hand, you know, as far as the price and the suppression of price.
	But I don't think there's any way now that we're going back to, you know, below $2,000 gold or anything like that.
	I think we're way past that.
	The price has been set.
	And so every time that price moves, David, the dollar hurts.
	And we can see it's bleeding.
	When the price of gold is going up, the dollar is dying.
	Yeah, absolutely. And it's not just countries that are wanting to repatriate and get out of the dollar.
	Zambia, the nation of Zambia, is actually going to criminalize the use of dollars.
	This is on RT. Of course, Russia wants to talk about this.
	But on Saturday, They had a draft document from the Central Bank of Zambia, and if they catch individuals using U.S. dollars, they could face up to 10 years in prison or substantial fines.
	So they're going to have, they want people using, this is, I've never even heard of their currency before, Tony, the Zambian Quacha and its subunit, the Ngui, I guess, N-G-W-E-E. I don't know.
	So those people are not going to be able to even use foreign currencies, especially the dollar.
	They want to criminalize it.
	You can go to jail for 10 years if you use the dollar.
	Interesting, isn't it? Well, I remember 21 years ago, I was in Iraq, and the only currency that was accepted at the time was the U.S. dollar on the ground.
	If you wanted to go out and buy something, they accepted U.S. dollars.
	And the first place they sent me to, and I've told this story before on your show, the first place they sent me to when Mosul fell was the bank.
	And the people were running out with boxes of Iraqi dinar, and it was pandemonium, but nobody wanted the Iraqi dinar anymore.
	I got to see a currency die in real time.
	What's interesting, since Ari Fleischer walked out to that podium and said that Operation Iraqi Liberation had begun, by the way, he did say that, Operation Iraqi Liberation, that spells oil.
	Somebody had to send him a note.
	Actually, the acronym is oil.
	You should probably not do that.
	But since that time, the Iraqi parliament has made it illegal for the banks to traffic in the U.S. dollar.
	They are moving away from the U.S. dollar.
	Look at that. As far as a slide in power and projection of the American empire, that is a swift decline.
	Just 21 years ago, that was the only currency that was accepted.
	And again, we ruled over Iraq.
	And now, all that Iraqi liberation, and they reject the U.S. dollar.
	And it's Zimbabwe.
	Look at that. Look at that currency, David.
	We've talked about this before. That used to be the joke.
	You know, they had the trillion-dollar notes.
	Well, you know, they've backed their current.
	They've scrapped that and gone to a gold-backed currency.
	And the IMF has actually praised them and said, well, this is really good.
	It's bringing stability to the country.
	You don't say. You know, a gold-backed currency, and then they're able to have a lot more stability.
	So I think this is really the way of the future is going to be something, a commodity-based, Currency for stability, because the entire Bretton Woods system and the dollar is absolutely collapsing before our eyes.
	And not that our leaders, or so-called leaders, are doing anything to prevent it.
	No, no, no, they don't care.
	As a matter of fact, they're doing everything they can to push it forward.
	I mean, just look at what Biden has done.
	Nobody has done more to take the dollar down faster than he did with his sanctions.
	You know, he essentially destroyed all credibility that anybody might have had in the SWIFT system or in the US dollar by his sanctions against Russia.
	No question about that.
	Doing exactly the opposite of what the central bank has done in the past with Paul Volcker, where he sacrificed the US economy and its wellbeing in order to prop up the dollar.
	What Biden did was just the Biden collective, I'll call them the Biden-C. I don't know.
	He doesn't know what he's doing, but the people who are calling the shots there, what they did was to sacrifice the dollar for their geopolitical ambitions.
	And I really do think that they want to push us into war.
	But what's going on now for people who want to exchange their fiat currency that is evaporating before our eyes into gold?
	What do you have going on there at Weiswolf?
	Well, that's always been my goal, to get you out of fake fiat currency, put you into a real asset, and we've set up davidknight.gold.
	A really easy way to do that, if you want a dollar-cost average and get a variety of medals, is to join Wolfpack.
	You can go to davidknight.gold, click the Join Wolfpack tab.
	We have memberships starting as low as $50, going all the way up to $5,000 to automatic purchases.
	We source all your metals for you.
	I go over these invoices meticulously.
	Of course, Yekka, who helps me, does a great job in sourcing metals and talking to customers.
	We're just really passionate about it.
	I think I've got close to 1,200 members now, and it's growing.
	The more people that join, the better prices I can get.
	I'm actually going to the trading floor in Dallas today to pick up Some medals.
	And I'll be taking them back to Branson soon.
	That's where we ship out as our Branson location in Missouri.
	But yeah, we've got promo code 1776.
	It's a good time to join. You can do one-time purchases too from Wolfpack.com.
	through the same site through DavidKnight.gold.
	But as I mentioned earlier, if you're saving paper assets and like they're backed by the US dollar, you may not retire.
	It's gonna be your money that retires.
	I like that line from Peter Schiff.
	So we've got 401ks, IRAs, you can roll those over into physical gold and silver as well through DavidKnight.gold.
	But yeah, this is an interesting time, David.
	I'm very thankful. I happen to have been working for years to position myself where I make sure I always get supply.
	This was my worry two years ago, as I told you on air many times.
	My worry is about when things start to really turn, am I going to be able to fill orders?
	And so far, so good.
	I've made a lot of inroads in the last two or three years on getting supply and making sure that we fill all the orders and everybody who's ordered from us gets their product.
	So I'm really, I'm really proud of the team that I have and working with shows like yours and and your listeners.
	And so if anybody has any gold or silver needs, give us a call.
	And I will say, I'll be announcing soon, we're going to have a crypto option.
	If you want to buy Bitcoin, I'm going to be setting up to where you can do that directly through me again.
	I have to build up some infrastructure for it.
	There's a lot of regulation and red tape.
	I have to do all the things. But we'll be able to do that as well.
	So just be looking forward to something dropping soon on that.
	Yeah, I'm sure you've got a lot to look at because they keep changing those rules, too.
	They just add a whole bunch of crypto stuff as well to try to make that.
	But, you know, you're growing at a great pace there.
	It wasn't that long ago that you crossed the 1,000 mark.
	Now you're up to 1,200 members of Wolfpack.
	That's great news. It's really good.
	Yeah, we're very thankful. It makes it a lot easier.
	I think there's probably a certain number.
	And this has been an interesting journey in entrepreneurism, too.
	Because I realize now why the big people don't do it.
	Because it's the moving parts and the logistics and all the rest.
	But I love it. I think it's great.
	We've got our database of people that we talk to.
	They're like family. We have close to 800 five-star reviews.
	I have almost no cancellations.
	Most people upgrade.
	So it's been really neat.
	And a lot of that's because of the We're good to go.
	Well, it's always great talking to you, Tony.
	Have a great Fourth of July, and I know you're going to be really busy stuffing those envelopes and everything, getting that stuff out there, shipping that much of all these little things.
	That's got to be a real logistical challenge to try to get all that, not only to get it now.
	In this environment to get the gold and silver, but also to get it distributed to everybody, I'm sure that's quite a task.
	So it's pretty impressive that you get that out to everybody every month.
	So we're going to take a quick look, a quick break.
	Wait a minute, I've got one question here.
	This is on Rumble, emulated voids, and I look forward to my Wolfpack coins every month.
	Well, that's great. That's great.
	That's awesome. Thank you again, Tony.
	Have a great Fourth of July weekend, and we'll talk to you next week, I guess.
	You too, David. Thank you very much.
	I'm sorry.
	Great.
	Thank you.
	And so folks, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, let's go back and pick up where we left off, at the Tower of Babel.
	And as Tony was talking about being right there.
	You know, it's interesting. Even secular archaeologists will talk about Babylon being the cradle of civilization.
	And why do they say that?
	What is that really about?
	Well, you know, we're told this all came from the plain of Shinar.
	All these different civilizations have popped up all at the same time.
	You had European civilization, Indian civilization, Chinese civilization.
	All these things popped up at the same time.
	And it's kind of interesting. You might want to look on YouTube.
	There's a couple of different videos that were put up.
	One Chinese missionary...
	It talks about how a lot of Chinese characters harken back to Genesis.
	And so you have things like a big ship is a picture of a ship with eight people inside of it, just like Noah's Ark.
	And this was there long before the Bible was brought to those places.
	And on and on, different things about the Garden of Eden and other things like that that are interesting.
	They don't construct words, of course, as you know, like we do, out of an alphabet of 26 characters.
	What they do is they construct picture words that have sub-ideas that are pictured in each of those.
	So, hence, something that is a big ship, like a Noah's Ark, would be a ship with eight people inside of it, you know, hearkening back to that.
	So, it's kind of interesting to take a look at that, but from his perspective...
	When he's talking about, as God views, the desire to have a strong, centralized government, whether it is the Tower of Babel or whether it is Nebuchadnezzar and his Babylonian Empire, the Persian Empire, the Greek Empire, the Roman Empire, all these that will be crushed.
	As the book of Daniel talks about.
	And God will crush these usurpers.
	Because this blueprint is really for decentralization.
	And we see that in numerous places.
	As a matter of fact, right after the Tower of Babel and the breaking up of people into different nations, instead they wanted to build one world government.
	Instead, God broke it into 70 nations.
	At the very beginning, instead of one global government.
	Later, God provided a decentralized government.
	He did it for Israel through 12 tribes, each of them independently ruled.
	Kind of a model for the United States system of federalism, with tribes like the states coming first, then sharing authority with a central or federal government.
	You had judges first, and then the kings.
	Also like America, central authority in Israel under God's design was decentralized with Moses' power shared throughout the tribes and with the 70 judges that he appointed.
	Later, there were cities that were ruled by elders who sat at the city gates.
	Then we look at the New Testament, the language of decentralized human government, he says, continues.
	Paul speaks of multiple governing authorities while acknowledging that the ultimate authority rests only in God.
	And we see that the curse of Babel is reversed as the people are reunited under Christ's rule, not under the rule of man.
	So America's founders went to a lot of trouble.
	Great links to establish a system of government that is based on the biblical principle of decentralization.
	In Federalist 47, James Madison writes, The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether it's one or a few or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced to be the very definition of tyranny.
	And isn't that what we have now?
	Isn't that the reality of what Washington has become?
	And, of course, the Anti-Federalists understood that.
	He writes, Despite Madison's forceful denouncement of centralization, some founders raised questions as to whether or not the Constitution had gone too far in response to the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation.
	And so, as these Anti-Federalists took names, Like Cato and others, one of them took the name of Brutus.
	Legislative, executive, and judicial, with respect to every object to which it extends.
	For by the last clause of the eighth section of the Constitution, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and by the sixth article, the Supremacy Clause, we hear about that all the time, don't we?
	Oh yeah, they've latched onto that, and he predicted that they would.
	He said, it appears that these articles, there is no need for any intervention of state government, Between the Congress and the people, to execute any one power vested in the general government, and that the Constitution and the laws of every state are nullified and declared void, so far as they shall be inconsistent with this Constitution or the laws made pursuant of it.
	So that's where we are.
	That's where we are. And see, he wrote that looking at the Constitution before it was ratified, and before there was the Bill of Rights.
	And so, Madison believed that he fixed that with the Tenth Amendment.
	But the Tenth Amendment, like the rest of the amendments, like the First Amendment that we just saw last week, multiple times, the Supreme Court ignoring it, just as the Congress does, just as the President does.
	Legislative, judicial, executive branches all ignore all of the Bill of Rights.
	They use the Constitution as a beard for authority, but they refuse to follow it or even acknowledge it.
	And so, if we were to look a map of the Constitution, we would see a thing, you are here at the Supremacy Clause, right?
	A little red arrow there.
	You are here. Federal Supremacy.
	That's all they want you to see.
	And yet where we want to go is to the Tenth Amendment.
	And so the application of the biblical standard of decentralization, he writes, is a straightforward way to help Christians respond to this trend.
	There are two primary applications.
	The first, if the federal government is consolidating authority at the expense of the states or the people, that would be in violation of the Tenth Amendment.
	It should be opposed.
	And second, if state or local governments are consolidating authority at the expense of the people, they too should be opposed.
	These two applications can also be used to evaluate current government programs in terms of decentralization.
	As I've said many times, you know, what is legitimate authority?
	And the way you need to think of this, think of the Lord of the Rings.
	There was a legitimate king.
	Remember in Gondor, they had the steward.
	It was a line of stewards, a red-carry line of stewards over there waiting for the king to return, right?
	And yet, they saw themselves as king.
	They didn't really want the king to return.
	Who is the king in the American system?
	Well, the law is the king.
	And the Constitution is the king.
	It is the supreme law.
	And so these people who take an oath to the Constitution as their condition of office are unfaithful stewards when they violate the Constitution.
	And as unfaithful stewards, they have no authority.
	And so when people want to argue, Christians want to argue Romans 13, understand that first and foremost.
	But these people have absolutely no authority if they violate their oath to the king.
	But he writes, it's important to understand that what makes this application function most effectively as a check on injustice and a defense of liberty is a covenantal understanding of the people.
	When the people is applied to individuals, it refers to those upon whom God has bestowed the responsibility of self-government, as we see in Genesis 2.
	When applied collectively, the people refers to the family and to the church governments.
	In other words, civil government.
	And they should not cross over into those other areas unless somebody within that other sphere is doing something that is violating their authority.
	So, for example, we allow the government to interfere in the sphere of the family if the family and the parents are abusing their children in some way, physically, sexually, something like that.
	Well, that is an abuse of their authority.
	And at that point, another sphere can come in and do something about it.
	But without that happening, if there's an intrusion, then that is what is illegitimate.
	This reminds us of Benjamin Franklin when asked what kind of government the Constitutional Convention had given the people.
	He said, a republic if you can keep it.
	Franklin knew that a republic was only suitable for a self-governing people.
	A republic and its self-governing people cannot be kept if the people do not consistently oppose efforts to centralize power.
	One reason that we failed on this is that many Christians do not understand that Romans 13 not only puts restraints on subjects, but also on rulers.
	It says those rulers who are a terror to good conduct rather than to bad conduct have broken their covenantal relationship with God.
	You know, when we look at that, Romans 13 says, you know, obey the government because it's God's minister to you for good.
	So is that...
	Proscriptive? Telling you, prohibiting what you can do?
	Or is it descriptive of what government is?
	Is it descriptive of a legitimate government?
	I think it is descriptive of a legitimate government.
	I think we have not only no obligation to follow an evil government, we have a moral obligation to oppose that government.
	A legitimate government is going to be God's minister to you for good.
	And if that's not what it is, and if it violates even its own authoritative base, basis of its authority, then it's incumbent upon you to resist that.
	And so, because they have broken their relationship with God, they've broken their relationship with the Constitution that they swore to as well. Christian rulers and subjects both have responsibility to resist covenant breaking rulers within the bounds of their own covenantal authority. Using both decentralization and the covenant as our standard, we can see the injustice of federal consolidation of power.
	We can see it in the federal income tax.
	We can see it in the welfare state.
	We can see it in the Civil Rights Act, the Roe v.
	Wade, and the court's tortured readings of the Constitution's Commerce Clause.
	We can also see it in actions like pro-life activists being convicted in federal court that I was talking about earlier for protesting the murder of children at a Tennessee abortion clinic when the abortion clinic now is illegal.
	How do you put people in jail for years pushing back against a criminal organization that's now been ruled as such by state law?
	And by the coercion of Americans into consuming corporate products such as renewable energy and vaccines.
	We see these injustices at the state and local level as well.
	For instance, the role of public schools or the minimum wage laws that result in high unemployment.
	And in the murder rates among black men in Chicago, and the taking of people's homes to benefit large, politically connected businesses, and in high levels of taxes and spending to support redistribution of wealth.
	And he doesn't even mention civil asset forfeiture.
	I think one of the clearest demonstrations of how the government operates as a thief.
	He said, Nate Fisher recently posted on X, he said, we live in an administrative judicial bureaucracy with almost no relationship to the form of government established by the Constitution.
	And he's right.
	A law professor that he quotes, Jeffrey Tomala, that's T-U-O-M-A-L-A, I apologize if I don't know how to pronounce that, but we'll call it T-U-O-M-A-L-A, explains, he said, today only lip service is paid, of course, to the concepts of people as a political sovereign.
	lip service only to federalism, lip service only to enumerated powers.
	He said, the separation of powers has been undermined, and pre-existing rights and laws that are supposed to bind and limit the authority of our rulers, listen to this, have been relegated to third-class status replaced by rights related to sexual practices.
	Your First Amendment, God-given right of free speech, and your free exercise of belief, has been subverted to imagined rights of sexual practices.
	Think of it that way. That is what is really happening with this.
	He also suggests, to Amala, suggests that the state is now the major usurper, and the church and the family are the major abdicators of legal powers and responsibilities.
	You know, as we talk about the Chevron idea earlier, The previous Supreme Court decision that abdicated a lot of power to the bureaucracy.
	And of course, it's not just the judiciary abdicating power through the Chevron decision that they just overturned.
	Doing that about 40 years or so ago.
	But it's also the Congress has abdicated its power to the unelected bureaucracy.
	The President has abdicated power to them as well.
	And so, but it's interesting as he talks about the fact that the family and the church has abdicated power to the government.
	Think about that.
	He says, it's not surprising then that one of the abdicators, the American church, both mainline and evangelical, is largely blind to this collapse of America's constitutional order over the last 235 years.
	Where the Constitution is either dead or just on its last legs, the only way to resurrect a constitutional order based on the lordship of Jesus Christ is for the church to repent and to declare to the world the whole counsel of God.
	And once they do that, not to say they're going to take over the government, Now they're going to have some kind of official state church or something like that.
	But it's the wisdom that would come from the church speaking out on what they understand about the nature, about human nature, and about what is right and what is wrong.
	If we refuse to do that, we have abdicated power to these institutions, to the schools, to the politicians, and others.
	To view our relationship through covenantal eyes, to properly define the role of civil rulers, and to develop a biblical understanding of decentralization and of human nature as well.
	That's the key thing.
	That's a great essay from Bill Peacock.
	You'll find it at AmericanReformer.org.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression...
	In our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
	It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.
	The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
	Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	I love it! I love it!
	The End
	the world.
	It's your move.
	Move.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alright, good to see Handy checking in there on Rockfan.
	He said, howdy from Chattanooga.
	Just getting fuel and wanted to drop in to hit that thumbs up.
	Well, good to see you there.
	Have a good trip. I know he's not, that's not where he's from.
	He's from Atlanta. So, having a trip of some sort.
	That's very nice. Let's talk a little bit.
	Since we've got Handy there, let's talk a little bit about what's going on with the pharmaceutical stuff.
	Again, as I mentioned briefly earlier, Moderna has received a $176 million What do we call this?
	Grant? Payola?
	What is it? Corruption?
	What is it? $176 million from the U.S. government to develop an mRNA bird flu vaccine.
	Now, I talked about the other day, Brian Chalhavi at Health Impact News had looked at Redfield, who has been really the chicken little of bird flu.
	The sky is falling, the sky is falling.
	It's inevitable. It's going to come to humans.
	And when it does, 25 to 50% of us are going to die.
	You don't know any of that.
	I don't know any of that.
	Just ridiculous. But why is Redfield doing it?
	Well, first he pointed out...
	That last year he was getting a lot of money from a company that had a bird flu test.
	And not just for bird flu, it was PCR, of course.
	It's garbage. Absolute garbage.
	If only Kerry Mullis hadn't died just before they pulled this scam.
	Very important to have him out of the way, wasn't it?
	Anyway, they've got a test that will look for, supposedly can detect at any, you know, whatever they're looking for, any kind of microscopic presence of bird flu or regular flu.
	Or the COVID stuff.
	And so he's been pushing that.
	And then as soon as the records for 2023 were released, Brian Shalhavi saw that he had been working with Novavax.
	They got cut out of the Operation Warp Speed mRNA stuff.
	So now this is maybe an opportunity for them to come back in?
	Who knows? They are working on an mRNA type of bird flu thing, but it looks like, again, the government is throwing money to Moderna.
	They kind of have a partnership there with DARPA, but it's BARDA this time, kind of the biowarfare version of DARPA. The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.
	BARDA. Just like DARPA. And they're going to be the ones who award it.
	They are now under HHS. The Department of Health and Human Services.
	The usual criminals that we see in all of this stuff.
	So HHS. BARDA underneath it.
	Giving money to Moderna.
	$176 million to develop a vaccine.
	And then there's going to be a bird flu summit coming up.
	The second annual international bird flu summit taking place in a couple of months.
	A global event to bring together all kinds of grifters and murderers.
	I mean experts, innovators and stakeholders.
	Stakeholders, always stakeholders, right?
	The people who try to drive the stakes through our hearts.
	The foster collaboration and a knowledge exchange.
	Well, let's just call it what it is.
	It's a conspiracy. But of course, they're not going to be charged with conspiracy, with that felony, that...
	The Biden administration charged that homeschooling father with.
	The World Health Organization, this vision, the conference is taking a one health approach.
	Talked about this yesterday.
	One health. What are we talking about?
	We're talking about the health of the planet, not of you.
	These people are advocates for the health of Gaia, Mother Earth, the Greek goddess.
	And of course you as these people have always seen humans You are a virus You are there to kill Gaia and so for one health to work they've got to kill the virus or at least get it under control and reduce the presence of the virus the
	The first international bird flu summit, they call it avian influenza, was held last October at the University of Arkansas.
	A couple of things to see here.
	Of course, the Clintons right there at the center of it.
	And Tyson Chicken.
	Clintons did a lot for Tyson Chicken.
	They even redefined, you know, we have these redefinitions of what a vaccine is.
	What is a woman? What is a vaccine?
	What is frozen chicken?
	Well, they decided that they would not call it frozen chicken.
	As long as it hadn't been frozen, I forget the number of hours.
	But, you know, they could, Tyson, and this happened under the Clinton administration, for their pals, Tyson Chicken, there in Arkansas, that had helped them so much.
	They redefined what frozen chicken was.
	Frozen chicken was something that had been frozen for more than, let's say, eight hours or something like that.
	And if it was frozen for eight hours or less, it was still considered to be fresh chicken.
	There you go. So all this stuff is, all these words are open for redefinition at any point in time.
	Tyson wanted to sell fresh chicken all over the country, so it's like, alright, so we'll change the definition of frozen chicken.
	No problem. So this event last year at the University of Arkansas was to address the effects of, as they put it, the highly pathogenic avian influenza, which has wreaked havoc upon the poultry industry worldwide since the latest outbreak began in 2022.
	So in 2023, they have a, you know, this is so bad.
	We've had to just kill millions of chickens because of one PCR test of one chicken who was not sick, so we kill all of these millions of chickens.
	So what are we going to do about this?
	Yeah, we'll do more of it.
	Unsurprisingly, vaccination was identified as the critical component in the fight against bird flu.
	The outcome of last year's Bird Flu Summit was an article titled Vaccination Against Highly Pathogenic Aviation Influenza from Opposition to Acceptance.
	Well, of course, this is going to be a PSYOP and a massive propaganda and censorship campaign.
	The event was to address the effects of this, and so now they're at it again.
	It's coming up. Another outcome of that summit was to hold another summit, and this time, in addition to the vaccine, they're going to start focusing on One Health.
	As I pointed out yesterday, these people are already putting out the idea that your food needs to be by prescription only.
	They will prescribe what you can eat, and they will proscribe what you can't eat.
	So you eat Z-Bugs, or we'll tell you how much protein you can have in a given month.
	They're going to treat it and dole it out like medication.
	Yeah, like one flu over the cuckoo's nest.
	That's what's going to happen out of the bird flu stuff.
	Unsurprisingly, they want to incorporate the One Health ideology this time.
	So the second bird flu summit is called the International Avian Influenza and One Health Summit.
	Emerging Issues Summit.
	So we know that's going to be the focus of it because One Health is the issue that is just as important to them to establish as the bird flu.
	So it's going to be at the end of September to the beginning of October.
	And it will be at, guess where to be?
	At the Don Tyson Center.
	Tyson Chicken. Right there in Fayetteville, Arkansas.
	Right at the center of all of it.
	Of course, anything that happens, whether it is mass vaccination of chickens, they don't care.
	Whether it is whatever regulations they come up with, that'll be fine for Tyson.
	Because they will be able to comply with it when the smaller people can't.
	Same type of thing we see with the banks.
	We see banks closing everywhere because of the Consumer Financial Protection Act that Elizabeth Warren put through.
	It shut down a lot of medium-sized and small banks because they couldn't comply with the extra regulations.
	So Tyson Chicken is just fine with all of this stuff.
	The number of speakers has doubled over the last year.
	They had 21 in 2023.
	This year they're going to have 46.
	We don't know how many attendees are going to be there yet, but last time they had 1,800 attendees.
	So it's a four-day meeting.
	In their minds, one health approach is needed because avian influences a significant global health concern which requires a collaborative effort.
	Amongst human health, animal health, and environmental health sectors.
	It's one way for them to get the world government together, right?
	To force the humans to do this.
	And that's what this vaccine from Moderna is about.
	This is not a livestock vaccine.
	You know, my take on all this and why they were focusing on cattle, especially cattle, Was that they want, and you know, you got the USDA saying we're going to tag and track dairy cattle.
	Why? I mean, it's a non-sequitur.
	It doesn't make any sense based on what they say is happening.
	This time, all of the focus of bird flu has been on cows.
	And as I said before, what about pigs?
	Well, they've already got the pig farms injecting the pigs with everything that they say.
	So they're going to go for the dairy cattle and they're going to go for the beef cattle because they want to get rid of meat and dairy.
	And so I was a bit surprised to see that this Moderna vaccine...
	It's for humans.
	Come on, folks. It's for horses, y'all, right?
	Like ivermectin, we're told.
	But no, the funding is made through the Federal Rapid Response Partnership Vehicle.
	That's what the program is called.
	All this stuff has to be done rapidly, doesn't it?
	Rapidly before people catch on.
	Rapidly before we can fight the censorship and the panic and get the information out.
	You see how, you know, the lie of these pandemics goes around the world multiple times before the truth can get its pants on.
	And so they've got to do it with a rapid response.
	They've got to do it at warp speed, all the rest of this stuff.
	In 2023, though, they've been laying the foundation for this that they're going to roll out on us rapidly.
	How do they destroy us?
	They do it gradually. Then they do it rapidly.
	They do it from the inside, as Fauci said.
	They do it with disruption.
	And then they do it iteratively.
	In 2023, BARDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, requested proposals from Moderna and other companies to develop mRNA vaccines for people.
	So just like Robert Redfield, they were convinced that it was inevitable that it was going to go to people.
	And of course, they're going to tell us that it's going to kill 25 to 50% of the people, just like Redfield is doing.
	They're all on the same page.
	It is a conspiracy.
	In the U.S., there have been, says Yahoo News, four human cases of bird flu.
	No, there haven't been any, actually.
	There's been some, you know, the first three, they had no temperature.
	They had no respiratory illness.
	Are you going to call that a flu? I don't call that a flu.
	They had pinkeye. These are people who worked on the farm.
	They probably didn't clean their hands sufficiently, wipe their eyes.
	That's how you get conjunctivitis, pinkeye.
	The fourth person had a sore throat, they said.
	But still, no congestion, no fever, nothing.
	None of these people had flu of any kind.
	And yet... What Yahoo News is telling us, health officials say the risk to the general population remains low, although dairy workers and others working near infected cows face heightened risk.
	They face heightened risk of vaccine coercion.
	You get the vaccine for bird flu, or you're going to lose your job.
	We can't afford you getting bird flu, being an incubator, and then creating, you are the factory then, to create a bird flu variant, A human bird flu variant that can now be passed to other humans.
	So you get that vaccine.
	You're the threat if you're working there with these cows.
	Because we know bird flu is not bothering birds this year.
	It's only bothering cows. So if you're working with cows, you get the dairy.
	The dairy worker gets it.
	And so, yeah, that's going to be what they're going to do.
	And then when these dairy workers get sick, From the Moderna mRNA vaccine.
	That'll be proof of a pandemic, won't it?
	That's what they have done throughout all this stuff.
	Projecting the adverse effects of the vaccine.
	Saying that that was long COVID. Or that that was COVID or long COVID or whatever.
	Projecting and pretending that all this stuff was not the vaccine.
	It was anything but the vaccine.
	So Pfizer purchased companies that produce drugs to treat the same conditions that were caused by the COVID vaccines.
	Isn't that interesting? This story from Exposé News.
	In 2021, Pfizer acquired Arena Pharmaceuticals.
	This raised eyebrows because the purchase price was so disproportionate to the market size of the drug that they'd acquired.
	Why'd they overpay so much for this?
	A drug that is a potential therapy for all kinds of immunoinflammatory diseases, including heart inflammation.
	So they paid a lot of money for a company that's got heart inflammation drugs.
	So, you know, myocarditis and other things like that.
	Then in 2023, and of course in 2021, Pfizer knew about myocarditis and pericarditis and these other inflammatory things that were happening.
	In 2023, Pfizer purchased CGen Pharmaceuticals, known for its cancer drugs.
	Maybe because of the turbo cancers that were on their way.
	In 2022, Pfizer purchased Global Blood Therapeutics.
	This is a drug to, they have a drug that treats sickle cell disease.
	Again, the amount of money that they paid for this company made no sense.
	Considering the price of the drugs and size of the market, sickle cell anemia is something that only affects the black population at this point.
	However, is there something that Pfizer knows about blood disease from their vaccine that we don't yet know?
	Why would they pay so much money?
	for a blood disease thing a cancer thing and especially for a company that has inflammatory medication for heart disease well We all know exactly what's going on with Pfizer,
	and it is now, we're seeing more and more attorney generals, the Kansas City Attorney General's legal report, and we also see several states that are suing Pfizer for fraud.
	This is an article that is on DailySkeptic.com, I'll just read you some of the different categories of fraud that are alleged in this lawsuit from the Kansas City Attorney General's legal report.
	Number one, Pfizer misled the public in terms of the way they characterized it as life-saving and so forth.
	Number two, Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to conceal critical data relating to the safety and the efficacy of the vaccine.
	Three, Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements in the US government and others to conceal, to suppress, to omit material relating to their vaccine, including safety and efficacy.
	Number four, they used an extensive study timeline to conceal critical data.
	The study was repeatedly delayed.
	Number five, Pfizer said it will make data from vaccine trials approved in the US available 18 months after the primary study completion date, but they've still not done any of that.
	Six, the FDA did not make any safety and efficacy data available for the Pfizer vaccine.
	Number seven, Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group.
	We've talked about that in the past.
	Number eight, in its press release announcing the emergency use authorization, Pfizer did not disclose that it had excluded immunocompromised individuals from its trials.
	Number nine, they knew that the vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.
	And they invested accordingly, as I just reported.
	Number 10, the United States military detected a safety signal for myocarditis, ignored it, and continued to kick people out, punish people if they did not get it.
	After Pfizer obtained FDA approval through emergency use authorization, Pfizer decided to study how often its vaccine may cause myocarditis or pericarditis.
	Again, how often.
	Not whither, but how often.
	In children, by testing 5 to 16-year-olds for troponin, which is the chemical that can be detected in your blood if you've had a heart attack.
	Upon information and belief, Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to strokes.
	Number 13, Pfizer's knowledge of safety signal for increased fatalities.
	Number 14, Pfizer only tested the booster shot on 12 participants.
	We're in the age range of 65 to 85.
	Number 15, Pfizer did not test the booster on any participant older than 85.
	And it goes on and on. That's only half.
	I didn't read you the supporting information.
	That's just half of the key allegations that are there.
	And there's more information about all of these.
	It truly is amazing when you look at the fraud and the criminality.
	And of course, it includes the CDC, the FDA, HHS, the NIH, the Department of Defense.
	They all knew. The Republicans, the Democrats, they all knew.
	The presidents, both of them, Trump and Biden.
	The Democrats and Republicans, the House, the Senate, all of them knew.
	And what are they doing?
	They're distracting you with nonsense about a lab leak.
	Whether or not this was genetically engineered or even attempted to be genetically engineered.
	Whether or not this was released accidentally or deliberately from a lab.
	Again, it doesn't matter if they did something in the lab.
	It doesn't matter if they leaked it or if they weaponized it.
	That's not what was killing people, folks.
	And all this talk about lab leaks and gain-of-function stuff...
	That's all there to keep you from looking at the vaccine itself.
	The fingerprints are all over the murder weapon from both political parties, both of the so-called presidents.
	And for all of the bureaucracy, they've all got their fingerprints on the murder weapon.
	And the murder weapon is not a gain-of-function virus.
	The murder weapon is the vaccine.
	Has been for a long time.
	We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, I just want to remind people again, I mentioned at the beginning of the show, Guard Goldsmith of Liberty Conspiracy is going to be doing the show tomorrow.
	I'm looking forward to hearing Guard on the 4th of July.
	It's going to be a great show, I'm sure.
	So give us a day or so off and I'd also like to remind people about subscribe star and how you can support us again Subscribe star is is a great way if you'd like to support the show you just set it at whatever level you would like to contribute each month and That happens automatically. However, if you are a subscribe star supporter, you might want to check and make sure that you're Your credit card is still good You know, they change the credit cards every couple of
	years and if it changes and it's no longer valid Subscribe star has a habit of not notifying you I've had several people let me know that.
	So, again, it helps us to kind of get a baseline on our budget.
	But there's other ways that you can support the program as well.
	and you can go to the david night show dot com uh... there you can see where you can find the show in terms of an audio podcast or where you can find the show in terms of the video archives we put up for the live show as well so we have links to where the live show is links to where you can get the archives of video archives as well as we usually put up two or three cuts out of the show each day as well on those uh... video channels
	or you can get the audio uh... that you can uh... download as a podcast so all that is there as well as where you can support us we have a p o box where you can uh... mail contributions or uh... zell if your bank supports that uh... many different ways and we really do appreciate and depend upon your support it's voluntary also give the clips we put up a share to your friends if you like them Yes, please do. Please do.
	Pass that around because even though we post it on social media, the social media stuff is pretty much, as I pointed out, pretty much gone.
	If you look, David Knight Journalists, they'll point you to a David Knight Journalist professor who's got 950 people, but they won't point you to the David Knight Show, at least not until way down several different pages there.
	Even though we have 136,000, somehow that just doesn't make any sense to me.
	But This is the way the technocracy operates.
	And let's talk a little bit about the technocracy.
	This was sent to me by Jay and Jessica.
	Thank you for sending this to me.
	Got this last week.
	And they're talking about the fact that Elon Musk is going to set up an AI supercomputer in Memphis, Tennessee.
	And some people are really happy about it.
	They said, look at this, he's not asking for any kickbacks or anything like that.
	I think those will eventually be there.
	He is the king of crony capitalism.
	Even if he's not doing it now, we look at it and say, well, as an AI supercomputer, is that really...
	Something that is beneficial for us, anyway.
	What about the Starlink and all these other things that have become, really, you know, you look at self-driving cars, that was the very first DARPA competition.
	For people to create self-driving cars.
	They funded people competing against each other.
	And of course, he knows how to get on board with government.
	He has become the world's richest man by doing exactly that.
	And so, if you look at, and they sent a link to the BCI, the brain computer interface that he's working on, there were Neuralink, Another creepy DARPA-like thing.
	But this goes back for quite some time.
	If you go back and look to November of 2020, how DARPA drives the brain-machine interface research, which is what he's working heavily with Neuralink.
	Nobody has funded BCI research and development with as much sustained energy as DARPA the military advanced research projects Almost every advanced or major technology in the field can be traced back to DARPA funding Neuralink's sewing machine surgical robot can be traced to the five-year 70-million dollar subnet program the initial concept for the
	stint road as he calls it was funded by the re-net program and these prosthetic limbs used by early brain gate trials were funded by the revolutionizing prosthetics program
	Startups like Nia Therapeutics, Paradromics, and the recently acquired Iota Biosciences also owe DARPA, either for direct investment or for funding of the underlying technology.
	That was 2020.
	If you go back to 2013...
	I remember when Obama put out the BRAIN Initiative.
	And I forget what the acronym was called.
	But, you know, B.R. It's an acronym.
	And just like, you know, the man from UNCLE or whatever.
	But it was funded and being driven by organizations like the NIH, like the National Science Foundation, like DARPA. DARPA funded that BRAIN Initiative back in 2013 with $110 million.
	And then we have another one, $70 million.
	Tens and hundreds of millions of dollars here and there and everywhere.
	They followed up that initial funding with over $200 million.
	The satanic cabal that runs the federal government, and that's exactly what they are.
	There's no better way to describe the military-industrial complex and the intelligence community than a satanic cabal.
	They have always been focused on mind control.
	In the mid-20th century, the CIA and these so-called scientists, these mad scientists, these Nazi scientists, they were all about mind control.
	That's when they created LSD. That's when they were doing their occultic experiments with out-of-body type of stuff, whether that worked or not.
	They've always been involved in the occult.
	They've always been involved in drugs.
	They've always been involved in messing with people's minds.
	It's always been about that.
	They're just now, though, instead of going with drugs, they're going with electrical signals.
	I've said in the past, when you go back and you look, when I started doing research as to who is this guy, Monsef Slaoui, at the time I didn't know who he was.
	The Moderna guy who was put in charge of Operation Warp Speed at one level by Trump.
	Well, he has a partnership going back with Fauci for a very long time.
	They worked together on the pandemics vaccine for swine flu in 2009, I think it was.
	But, you know, they've been around for a long time, and if you go back and went back and looked to see what I could find of him in terms of conferences and things like that, and...
	You would see that Francis Collins, head of NIH, Fauci, underneath him at the NIAID. And then Monsef Slaoui, who at the time was working for, I think it was GlaxoSmithKline that he was working for.
	Maybe it was Merck.
	But the three of them were going around all these different conferences.
	And for the most part, what they were talking about was electroceuticals.
	You see, the people like Fauci and Monsef Slaoui and Francis Collins, they were making this transition from mind-altering drugs to mind-altering and snooping electronics.
	And that's why DARPA has poured so much money into this brain-computer interface and all these other products.
	The overreaching goals of DARPA research funding for BCI, for Brain-Computer Interface, are to augment the cognitive capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces and to mitigate the human consequences of armed conflict by developing solutions like prosthetic limbs or PTSD therapies.
	You see, they've been openly talking about their projects to be able to read and to rewrite the Your memories, just like Total Recall, the science fiction thing.
	But then they explain it away by saying, well, we want to do that so that we can help people with PTSD. You understand, of course, how it won't be used just for that.
	The DARPA strategies and their strategic interest in BCI started back in the 1960s when J.C.R. Licklider You've heard that name before, right?
	This is the DARPA psychologist who created the Internet.
	He called it the Intergalactic Computer Network.
	A DARPA psychologist created the concept of the Intergalactic Computer Network, the Internet, in the 1960s.
	And the same guy began with the idea of a brain-computer interface.
	Now, they didn't have the technology for the Internet.
	Not until the 1990s.
	And then they jumped into it at both feet.
	They created, openly created a CIA venture capital company.
	And these other people from the intelligence communities got on all these other venture capital firms.
	They picked the competitors and so forth.
	But folks, they've been after.
	I've said for the longest time that the Internet was a psychological tool of control.
	And so are these things like Neuralink and these other technocratic devices.
	And so he published his vision of the man-computer symbiosis, the same guy who envisioned the internet, J.C.R. Licklider.
	Remember that name? He is somebody who should go down with people like Joseph Mengele.
	DARPA funded universities for research on EEG, EMG, pupillometry, and event-related potentials.
	Studying your pupils, okay?
	Just that way.
	I'm getting hung up on this thing.
	DARPA funded both invasive and non-invasive brain-computer interface research in the 2000s.
	Under the umbrella of the AugCog and the Hand Program.
	So, you know, they're going to augment your cognitive capabilities, right?
	Super soldiers. DARPA also invested heavily in memory enhancement and recovery.
	They called it RAM, RAM, Replay, and Remind.
	This is where they're doing the total recall thing.
	Getting the memory back, reading the memory, rewriting the memory, giving people false memories.
	And of course, it's just to help little old ladies across the street or to help people with PTSD. Nothing to be concerned about at all, is there?
	No. No, nothing at all.
	But this is a kind of dark, total evil.
	That you're on the hook to pay for.
	These trillions of dollars that they are spending on a regular basis.
	Well, on Rock Vanguard, Goldsmith writes, I'll see you all tomorrow.
	Happy Independence Day early.
	Thank you, David, Travis, Karen, and family for letting me fill in.
	Well, I can't thank you enough for giving us a break.
	We really do need it. And so I'm going to take off Thursday and Friday.
	We don't know exactly what will happen on Friday, but it will either be a rebroadcast of some of the best of interviews or Guard will do it.
	I don't want to lean too heavily on Guard because he's got his own programs, Liberty Conspiracy that he does and many other things, working for The MRC-TV, doing articles and videos for them as well.
	He is a very busy guy, and rightfully so, and we really do appreciate whenever Gard steps in.
	Always fascinating. Favorite of my brother-in-law, who tells me how much he enjoys Gard's programs.
	So, I know tomorrow's going to be a great one.
	Thank you so much and we wish all of you a happy 4th of July and we hope that we can somehow regain our freedoms and our liberties and our rule of law without any real fireworks or pyrotechnics.
	Let's hope that we can do it peacefully.
	Have a good day. Have a good weekend.
	And hopefully we'll see you next Monday.
	Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah. Good job.
	And you want to know something else?

▲