Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 1, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:05:17

The David Knight Show - 07/1/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You
	As the clock strikes 13 it's Monday, the 1st of July, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today, we're going to take a look at the debate.
	You know, the debate was on Thursday evening, and yet, since that time, everybody's been debating...
	We're going to take a look at that.
	We're also going to take a look at the fact that there was no debate over any issue of importance, none whatsoever.
	We're going to go back and take a look.
	Everybody's all excited about Biden and it shows us that this myth of the super state run by a Superman is designed to fail.
	Not what the founders had in mind.
	So we're going to take a look at that.
	We're also going to have Dr. Shiva Iyadurai joining us in the third hour.
	I want to get his take.
	This should be interesting.
	Yeah, we're going to follow the money.
	We're also going to take a look at some Supreme Court decisions about the bureaucracy, the Chevron rule, as well as some other issues.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, as I just said, this debate of all things should have destroyed the idea that we're going to get anything fixed in Washington.
	There's no savior.
	There's no messiah. There's no benevolent dictator coming to save you folks.
	Neither of these two guys.
	And, of course, the Democrats were scrambling around trying to figure out what they're going to do next.
	And we're going to talk about why they did this.
	I actually mentioned it on Friday, the fact that they put this debate so early.
	They knew what was going on.
	They pretended that they didn't.
	And now you see the mainstream media all over the place.
	I mean, the media establishment lays on the horn.
	That's the headline from Politico.
	And we saw Anderson Cooper talking to Lala Harris.
	I played this clip last Friday.
	But look at this. I got the point that you're making about a one and a half hour debate tonight.
	I'm talking about three and a half years of performance in work that has been historic.
	But is that the man who we saw on the stage tonight?
	Is that the person you see in meetings every day?
	The person that you saw on the debate stage that has, for the last three and a half years, up until today, performed in a way that has been about whether it be in the Oval Office.
	Yeah, okay.
	So Anderson Cooper didn't know.
	You know, come on, Lala, you work with him all day.
	Come on, Anderson, you report on him every day.
	You've had these people talk about his condition, and they all knew.
	They all knew. They knew that he was going to be a big problem in this election, so now they're moving to get him taken out.
	Just take a look at what Jon Stewart is doing with his audience.
	I don't know if this is canned laughter or if this is the real thing.
	How close the police are there.
	Almost every police group in the nation from every state.
	He said let's take a look at when he's not talking.
	and China nothing and Russia nothing and India nothing.
	The blank stares.
	I had to get that reporter out.
	He should have had him out a long time ago.
	Because I didn't have legislation.
	I said close the border.
	We had the safest border in history.
	He's kind of like MAGA now, isn't he?
	Thank you.
	Got to make an excuse for him.
	Not great. But, uh...
	4D chess. Resting 25th Amendment face.
	Yeah. 25th Amendment face.
	It's just 4D chess. Come on, John.
	You can do what Alex did.
	When you're caught with these embarrassing situations about the guy that you become a shill for, well, you just say, well, it's just 40 chests.
	He's still a genius. And he's a stable genius.
	He's not the only one talking about the 25th Amendment.
	We've actually got the guy who's running Pennsylvania, McCormick, who's running for Senate again.
	And he mentioned it.
	I don't think the Republicans want to put Lala Harris in there, do you?
	I mean, maybe they think they could beat her.
	That's a pretty risky gamble to have that as the person.
	But, you know, they're going to set some general policy tones.
	But look, it's not going to change regardless of who they put in.
	The people who are running our government are the CIA in Washington.
	We're going to take a look at the Supreme Court case that pushes back some on the bureaucratic state, the regulation without representation, taxation without representation.
	That was something that was put in way back in the Reagan administration.
	And it was put in because Reagan's EPA wanted to ease up some regulations.
	And so we had some environmental groups sue the EPA. And the Supreme Court said, no, the EPA can do whatever it wants.
	And boy, that really opened up the precedent for a lot of things.
	That was 1986, you know.
	1984 is 1986 that we had the Fauci precedent of immunity.
	It doesn't necessarily help to have a conservative president there.
	We have to stop this stuff at the state and local level.
	Washington is done. It's been done all my life.
	We've had presidents who were, and of course Reagan wasn't all that sharp in his second term, but he was prior to that.
	And still he was run by the CIA, Bill Casey and other people.
	They helped to put him in with the Iran-Contra issue.
	The government is being run by the CIA. It's just that simple.
	There was a coup when they shot Kennedy.
	It's been that way ever since.
	And if you don't understand that, take a look at Gina Haspel and all the rest of the people.
	Look at how Trump is afraid to criticize them, afraid to criticize or fire Fauci.
	Biden has now been given one week to stand down by Democrats, and you've got Barack Obama defending the president.
	You know, the people who want to get back in, and of course, not Barack, but Michelle, the people who want to get back in, like Michelle Obama or like Gavin Newsom.
	They're portraying themselves right now as such loyal allies of Biden.
	They want to push him out.
	And again, it's a situation where the knives are out.
	These people do anything and everything to each other to get that position because there's a lot of money and power and all of that.
	But for you and I, their Game of Thrones is about them.
	It's about their little fiefdom.
	Who gets to rule over the pot of gold in Washington?
	This massive black hole that they bribed the world with.
	I don't think when you look at replacing him, now even Trump is pulling back.
	Trump would like to run against Biden because he'd like to get back in there and start, you know, collecting money and favors and things like that.
	But those are playing nice now.
	We're really setting up things for the future.
	Newsom, Michelle, and others.
	Barack Obama. Bad debate nights happen.
	Trust me, I know. But this election is still a choice between someone who's fought for ordinary folks his entire life.
	Yeah, somebody who wants to take away your car, your range, your air conditioning, your heater.
	You name it. Biden's like this grumpy old man, get off my lawn.
	You can't have that.
	But he's bought and paid for.
	David Plouffe, who managed Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign, told CNN, it's kind of a DEFCON 1 moment.
	They're three years apart, but they seemed about 30 years apart tonight.
	So again, he can say that.
	Obama's not going to say it.
	And then David Axelrod, another Obama advisor.
	Very harsh criticism of Biden, but Obama's not going to say that.
	Axelrod said there are going to be discussions about whether or not he should continue.
	Well, it's interesting to go back and look at the condition that he's in.
	And again... It is the type of thing where, for the longest time, it was even going back to Rush, Trump put out a clip of the 2020 debate, and it might have been in 2019, where Biden seemed to be coherent there.
	He was far more mentally awake and aware.
	So there's been a lot of degradation in the last five or six years.
	That happens to all of us.
	Like I said, we're either going to die or that's going to happen to us one way or the other.
	The question, though, is can he see that?
	Will he pull back? Or is he and Jill, who's a good bit younger than him, are they so fascinated with power that they won't pull back?
	You know, Biden spent seven days preparing for this.
	Nobody saw him for seven days.
	There was actually an article on Thursday, Daily Mail.
	Biden seen for the first time in seven days.
	So who was running the country?
	Right? You want to go back to this idea that Biden or Trump are running the country?
	That they're vital? That their input is necessary?
	They're not. They're figureheads.
	They're just puppets that are out there.
	And you know, sometimes you can see who's pulling the strings.
	Sometimes it's like the beginning of 2001.
	Remember that? Where they had the guys in the monkey suits and it kind of spoiled the whole thing where you could see the zippers in the back of their suit.
	Well, I think we saw the zippers.
	And we saw the zippers for both of them.
	Trump did not have a good debate either.
	He was evasive. He was meandering and non-responsive on key issues.
	And of course, CNN isn't going to ask any key questions either.
	But nobody paid any attention to what Trump said.
	We're going to take a look at some of the things that were said, some of the things that were not even asked, of course.
	But you know, when you're voting for a president, you're voting for a group of people around him that you don't even see.
	And Colonel Douglas McGregor has said that.
	He said you can now see that the government is being run by some people in the background, but you don't vote for.
	Yeah, Biden finally broke cover on Thursday afternoon after spending seven days holed up at Camp David, preparing for the debate that night.
	And so the question is, when you even talk about mental competence, Is that going to be a deal killer for the American public?
	Take a look at Fetterman going back to the last election cycle when he became senator.
	No. Here's what I think we have to fight about inflation here right now.
	That's what we need to fight about inflation.
	We all have to make sure that everyone that works is able to...
	That's the most American bargain.
	That if you work full-time, you should be able to live in dignity.
	It's well true. But going to those kind of vocational schools, able to create a career to wage a lot of high salary and supporting, reduce those costs are critical too.
	Yeah, well, you know, and of course, who is he debating?
	Oz. That was Trump's pick.
	A guy who's not even fully an American citizen.
	Divided loyalties.
	Still a citizen of Turkey.
	I will renounce my Turkish citizenship if I'm elected, he said.
	So that I can get access to classified documents.
	That was who Trump supported.
	And then on the other side, you had Fetterman.
	Just like we see in the presidential race, there's nothing here to choose.
	So Joe Biden taking flack for urging Joe to carry on.
	As a matter of fact, I thought, what...
	Bablin B had was perfect.
	This is Joe Biden yelling and screaming.
	Joe Biden refuses to drop out of presidential race.
	He's just kind of staring off into space.
	I think this was the rally that they had after the debate.
	They had a rally in North Carolina.
	But that says it all, doesn't it?
	It's Joe Biden. Because, you know, we go back and we look at the very beginning of the Biden administration.
	She was accompanying Bill to G7 at the time, and she put this out on social media.
	Here I am. I'm on Air Force One, and I'm prepping for the G7. What does she have to do?
	What's she got all this paperwork there for?
	You know, who is president?
	I don't think it's her, but she thinks it's her.
	Quite frankly, I think it's the CIA that's there.
	But there is a cabal of people around him.
	Colonel McGregor, Biden's cognitive decline makes it obvious that the U.S. government is in, quote, unelected hands.
	Makes it clear. We've known that, but it makes it clear.
	So, as Reason Magazine had said, what if they have a really, really bad debate, as they did?
	They said, this could be a good thing to try to get people away from the idea that Washington is going to fix our problem.
	That these guys know what they're doing, that they can make a difference to rein in this massive bureaucracy.
	President Biden is not fit to discharge the immense duties of the presidency, wrote Colonel McGregor.
	Yet his enablers and his political allies continue to exploit the president to substitute their destructive agenda for the interests of the American people.
	It's all about money.
	It's all about who they pay off.
	As Grammy for God says, they already know who will replace Biden.
	It's all about the timing. Exactly.
	They wanted to replace him.
	And... That's why they've never had the presidential debates until well after the nominating conventions.
	Do you realize that neither Trump nor Biden are nominated?
	Neither of them. They are the presumptive nominees because we didn't have a primary.
	Because they didn't debate anybody along the way.
	First debate for both of them.
	What are they afraid of? We saw.
	What a train wreck they are.
	They don't want to debate anybody.
	They don't want to have any primaries.
	The Democrat Party even shut down challengers in Florida.
	So, they wanted to get rid of him.
	The people around him have got a lock on that party.
	And I don't think they are going to get rid of him.
	That's my guess. And I'll tell you why.
	Again, it's going back to money.
	It doesn't matter who this guy is.
	As long as he is alive, they'll prop him up like we can at Bernie's.
	They did that by the way, with Brezhnev.
	I'll tell you about that in just a moment.
	Uh, but, uh, this is not a theory.
	This is something that happens when you have a highly centralized authoritarian government, like we have, like they had at the Soviet Union.
	Then we have that same kind of government today in Washington.
	Uh, so this is something that's been there for a long time.
	They wanted to set this up again.
	You would usually have the nominating conventions in August, and then you'd have the first presidential debate at the end of September, as I mentioned on Friday.
	And then usually there was three of them.
	So it'd be one at the very end of September, one in the middle of October, one at the end of October, just before the election this time, they have one debate a couple of months before they're going to have all six weeks, four, maybe about six weeks before they have the nominating convention, they have the They're not even the nominees.
	Then they're going to have the second debate right at the beginning of September, and that's it.
	Very different. Well, we could say the same thing about Trump.
	And we could say, unable to discharge the immense duties of These immense duties were usurped.
	It was never the design of the founders to have these kind of immense duties and immense powers focused in Washington, let alone in one man.
	And this is what even conservatives don't understand anymore.
	It's how we have created a Caesar.
	We crossed the Rubicon a long time ago in the Potomac, and we now have a Caesar there.
	And guess what? These Caesars and this declining empire are kind of along the line of Caligula and some of these other idiots that occupied the office.
	And it was an intense competition there.
	They were stabbing each other in the back, literally.
	Here, it's not come exactly to that yet.
	So, Biden's manipulators fueled a proxy war in Ukraine, says McGregor.
	That risks drawing us into a catastrophic confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia.
	Their unqualified support for Israel's disproportionate actions in Gaza erodes our moral authority and credibility as a champion of peace and stability.
	Well, I generally agree with General McGregor, but I gotta say, not in my lifetime.
	He's about a decade older than me, but...
	I've never seen Washington as a paragon of moral authority, credibility, and a champion of peace and stability.
	My entire life, Washington has been initiating wars without even having a real declaration.
	I haven't seen it as a champion of peace and stability.
	It would be nice for a change, but I haven't seen that.
	He says it's time to ask, who governs this country?
	Have we surrendered control to unelected bureaucrats?
	Yes. Sprawling federal agencies?
	Yes. Affluent donors who do not have the best interests of Americans at heart?
	These are obviously rhetorical questions.
	We know the answer to all of those.
	And as I said before, Brezhnev.
	Brezhnev, historian says, actually died in 76, but he continued on for another six or so years.
	He suffered clinical death in January 1976, but was revived and ruled in a virtual daze for six more years.
	After Brezhnev's 1976 stroke, he gradually found it more and more difficult to carry out the most simple protocol functions and could no longer understand what was going on around him.
	He was largely kept in power by corrupt officials in his entourage.
	Who knew they were safe while he remained president and Communist Party general secretary.
	Because, you know, in the Soviet Union, when you are out of power, the other guys might come for you.
	Kind of what we've been seeing from the Soviet collective known as the Biden administration.
	They come after those people who they defeated in the last election.
	Kind of like what we see with Zelensky, isn't it?
	Arresting the people that he defeated in the last election.
	Brezhnev, who became party leader in 1964 after the removal of Khrushchev, died in November 1982.
	The period of his rule is now officially condemned as one of social and economic stagnation.
	Well, all communist rule is really that way.
	And the problem is, and what I'd like to try to get across to people, is that when you look at this debate, you understand the futility of central control of a strong leader.
	That is a Soviet system.
	It always results in social and economic stagnation.
	That's a hallmark of that.
	And when we look at the Biden administration, oh, it's run by a bunch of people who are around him.
	We don't know who all of them are.
	But again, that is, they're ultimately controlled by the CIA. But when we look at it, it's a Soviet system, a committee.
	And the bureaucracies are like that as well.
	I'll just throw this in as a side thing here.
	Brezhnev, before he had the stroke, was a big fan of American Westerns.
	Nobody seems to be a big fan of American Westerns.
	Horizon didn't do too well at the box office anymore.
	But he was a big fan of American Westerns, and his favorite was The Rifleman.
	And he was able to come to the U.S. in 1973.
	And he met Chuck Connors.
	Now Chuck Connors looks like he's standing a little bit closer to the camera, but he is a gigantic guy.
	He was really big. He played baseball and basketball.
	And a really tall guy.
	So when he came... He wanted to meet Chuck Connors, the rifleman.
	And Chuck Connors gave him, he said, here's some pistols that I used on the TV show.
	I guess the joke was on Brezhnev because the rifleman didn't have pistols.
	He had rifles.
	These are the pistols that I never needed to use as a character on the rifleman.
	So yeah, that was the guy that they had ruling them.
	And I can imagine... Joe Biden being really excited to get the pistols of the riflemen as well.
	Anyway, Simon Foster, thank you so much for the tip and the progress retort.
	Thank you. He says, David, I'm leery of the Chevron defense ruling.
	While we're celebrating, they're again loading the deck with rationale, disband, SCOTUS. Let's give you a bump out of the gate this month.
	Thank you very much. And I want to say thank you to everybody.
	The end of the month, we continue to get things over the weekend.
	And... We're up to seven-eighths, so that's where we finished the month.
	We moved it up there.
	We'll leave it there, even though today's the first.
	We'll leave it there so people who follow it can see.
	But thank you all for doing that for us and helping the program.
	Assyrian Girl, what's the alternative at the moment?
	Lala and the White House are better off with an unconscious president than out and out fool.
	Well, again, the...
	The alternative is that we start to do things at the local and state level.
	That's where we've got to focus our effort.
	And we've got to stop letting them redirect us to Washington.
	That's why I'm covering this, to see the futility of this.
	But we can get things done at the local level.
	You know, when Biden did the pistol brace, and of course Trump did it as well.
	He put it on, then took it off.
	Because of the election thing.
	But he put it on in 2019.
	Take it off in 2020. But when they did their gun control by executive order, or pistol brace for example, they fixed it here in Tennessee.
	They said, you're not going to ban anything that we've explicitly made legal.
	And they did it. And they said, furthermore, we're not going to let you enforce this law.
	You can't commandeer us.
	You can't force us to do this.
	The way the government operates...
	It's by bribery and blackmail.
	Financial bribery, financial blackmail.
	If you get people at the state level who don't want to take that, you know, they love to get that money because then they can hand it out as bribery and as blackmail.
	They can go to people and say, look at what we just gave you the money to build or what we built for you and that type of thing.
	If we can get past that with people at the state and local level, then we don't have to sell bribery Our heritage of freedom for a bowl of soup, which is what these people are offering us.
	Dougalug, Biden walking away from the debate stage was riveting.
	Will he negotiate the steps or will he fall?
	And you had President Jill come to get him down and rescue him.
	Psalm 144, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that. I'd like to say, when I drove a truck on train bridges, there were thousands of corn pops all over the country in democracy.
	Oh, and you know the thing.
	Thanks, David. Starting my new job on Wednesday.
	God bless you and everyone out there.
	Well, that's great to hear.
	Congratulations. I'm glad that you were able to find a new job soon. I know you would probably like to have had it even sooner than it was.
	M Sellers, my MAGA aunt was so happy that prayers have been answered because Trump did great and held it together without being rude and blew Biden away in the debate. Her perspective wasn't even reality. Yeah, we're gonna talk about what he had to say and the questions that were there.
	Again, what happened was nobody saw how bad he was.
	And if they replace somebody else, then it's going to make him look bad.
	But look, the elections are so corrupt.
	I mean, here's MAGA who's been telling us for the last four years that the elections were stolen.
	They think they've got a handle on it this time.
	It isn't going to happen. I've watched elections be stolen my entire life.
	And it was Trump who let them or pushed them, either way, whatever your perspective is, to do this vote-by-mail stuff in the first place.
	They did that with him as president.
	You think that they can do anything to clean up the elections when he's not president?
	I mean, he was either a fool or a tool to allow that kind of stuff to happen in 2020.
	You think it's going to be any better?
	So, again, the election at this level...
	Doesn't really matter. They've already made their selection.
	These people are just, the whole thing is a pageant.
	Go back to Wag the Dog.
	Remember that? He said, think of it as a pageant.
	That's the way I think of it.
	Yeah, we're not going to prosecute him for the obvious corruption.
	We're going to talk more about the corruption.
	Even more stuff has come out.
	Atomic Dog. David, can you tell us what your schedule will be this week?
	Yes. We're going to take Wednesday and Thursday off.
	We'll have rebroadcast. Probably have a live show.
	But either a live show or rebroadcast on Thursday and Friday.
	I want to, before they take it out of the theaters, I want to see Horizon.
	So... I'm going to celebrate 4th of July doing something traditional like that.
	I hope it's a good film, but I think that whenever I see that critics hate something and hate it because it is so traditional, it's like, I think I better see that.
	So anyway, no other plans besides that, but just to the rest of it.
	M. Sellers, I think people have given up and think this is the best we have to choose from, and there's no one else to vote for.
	Then there's the MAGA crazies.
	Very few actually know what's going on.
	Well, that's just it.
	You know, again, if we could, the positives that could come out of this is for us to realize that we're not going to fix these problems in Washington.
	Certainly, at least not this time.
	But the whole idea of an all-powerful, benevolent dictator in Washington that the left and the right have now bought into 100%, that must be destroyed.
	And maybe that won't even happen with this.
	But it should happen as we look at this.
	People should get an idea as to what is really going on.
	And we need to... Not put all of our effort into Washington.
	Again, Musk said, look at what Soros is doing.
	He's focusing on local elections, local district attorneys.
	Sometimes he gives money to state district attorneys.
	Why is he doing that? Because he wants to change society.
	How do you change society? All politics is local.
	Soros knows that.
	Musk knows that. Maybe they know something we don't.
	You know, these guys are a couple of the richest people in the world.
	And they got rich.
	By analyzing and manipulating government.
	Elon Musk did it with all the different government contracts that he got.
	Soros did it the same way. He busted the Bank of England, because he knew what the central bankers and the politicians were going to do, and he outmaneuvered them.
	These guys know how to do this.
	We need to wise up and stop being suckers.
	Stop focusing on the presidential race.
	That's why I want to get Shivaya Duray on, because he talks about ground-up decision, bottom-up changes, and that's really what we need to focus on.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	All right.
	All right.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Alacto Spook says, Trump did great.
	It wasn't even debate.
	You can't debate, at least meaningfully, with a simpleton like Biden.
	CNN worked hard to block RFK Jr.
	It would have been a debate then, excepting Biden.
	Yeah, it would have.
	Like I said from the very beginning, there's a lot of things that I disagree with RFK Jr.
	on. I would not vote for him.
	But at least he would bring up these topics and then have discussion on a lot of things that were not brought up.
	For example... I got the transcript from the debate.
	I looked to see when they discussed certain keywords.
	For example, they never mentioned Pfizer.
	Zero mentions of that. Moderna?
	No. mRNA? No.
	Mask? No.
	Ventilator? No. Fauci?
	No. CDC? No.
	Guns? No. Many, many things like that.
	They basically talked about themselves, if they could talk at all.
	Biden couldn't. They did mention vaccine, but not much.
	Listen to the context of what was said about vaccines.
	And this is all that was said about vaccines, folks.
	Trump said, well, we got hit with COVID. We did a lot to fix it.
	I gave him an unbelievable situation with all the therapeutics and all the things that we came up with.
	You know, things like masks and ventilators.
	And a program being run out of CMS to bribe hospitals to say that people had COVID, put them on ventilators and kill them, give them remdesivir, other things like that.
	We gave him something great.
	Remember, more people died under his administration.
	You know why? Because he was giving people your shot, Trump.
	Even though we had largely fixed it.
	Yeah? He did?
	More people died under his administration than our administration.
	We were right in the middle of it.
	Something which a lot of people didn't like to talk about, but he had far more people dying in his administration.
	He did the mandate, which is a disaster, mandating it.
	The vaccine went out. He did a mandate on the vaccine, which is the thing that people most objected to about the vaccine.
	I think the thing they most objected to was death, disability, and the ongoing health issues of these things.
	I think they objected not just to having their decisions about the vaccine taken away.
	I think people objected to being called non-essential.
	I think they objected to having their job or their business taken away.
	I think they objected to being treated like Prisoners.
	When there wasn't even any pretense of quarantining sick people.
	What they did with lockdown was not quarantine.
	You quarantine people if they are identified as being sick.
	This is pre-crime.
	Pre-crime.
	Crime of being sick, supposedly.
	He did a very poor job.
	Just a very poor job.
	That's it. That's what was said about the vaccines.
	Now, Biden doesn't mention it at all.
	At all. But Trump pretends that the people dying, and we know when they died, they died in third quarter, fourth quarter of 2021.
	That's when it spiked, because that's when his shot went out.
	And then when it comes to climate, Dana Bash says, well, another persistent challenge is the crisis, climate crisis.
	2023 was the hottest year in recorded history.
	False. Communities across the country are confronting the devastating effects of extreme heat, intensifying wildfires, stronger hurricanes, and rising sea levels.
	Every bit of that's a lie.
	Every bit of that is a lie.
	I've covered this repeatedly.
	But anyway, she goes to Trump.
	He doesn't correct any of this stuff.
	President Trump, you vowed to end your opponent's climate initiatives, but will you take any action as president to slow the climate crisis?
	And Trump says, there is no climate crisis.
	This is all just an invention to steal your money and to lock you down and to starve you.
	No, he doesn't say that.
	Trump says, well, let me get back to what he said about the police.
	How close the police are to him.
	Almost every police group in the nation, from every state, is supporting Donald J. Trump.
	He doesn't use that moment to defend us from the climate, MacGuffin.
	The thing that is key now.
	The thing that is preeminent.
	Even more so than the pandemic.
	Although they may switch it back and forth.
	They can go back and forth between these two things.
	He does nothing to defend us.
	And he's got a...
	When you look at the people that he's lined up here...
	To be vice president, one of them, Doug Burgum, one of the others from way back when, until she bragged about shooting her dog, was Kristi Noem.
	The governors of North and South Dakota, both of them, heavily involved in this summit pipeline.
	This unbelievably idiotic scheme to pump CO2 across the nation, To mess up people's lives, to mess up their homes, their farms with eminent domain so they can pump CO2 into the ground in North and South Dakota.
	And both these governors are in on it.
	And, of course, the guy who is the CEO of that pipeline has been to events at Mar-a-Lago.
	This is more climate nonsense.
	This is as bad, as corrupt, as anything that Bill Gates does.
	And Trump and Burgum and Noam are in on it.
	It's disgusting to see this stuff.
	And when he gets asked a question about climate, what's he doing?
	He dodges it. Well, let's talk about me.
	Let's talk about people who endorse me.
	You know, what are you going to do about crime?
	As if that was a presidential responsibility.
	Got to solve all crimes everywhere, right?
	Get out your deerstalking hat and your cape and your magnifying glass.
	You know, solve all the crimes everywhere as president.
	Because that's what they, you know, any problem in America needs to be solved by Washington or specifically by the president.
	This is the mindset that CNN wants to sell you.
	This is the mindset that everybody's bought into.
	So what are you going to do about that? Well, what are you going to do about crime?
	Assuming that it was something that the President has in his job description of the Constitution anyway.
	Well, his response would be, well, the police unions love me.
	And he talked to Biden. What are you going to do about the border?
	Well, the Border Patrol loves me.
	And then Trump says, no, they love me.
	Neither one of them have done anything about the border.
	What are you going to do about abortion?
	Well, you know, those evangelicals, they really love me.
	Do you see a pattern here? Is every issue about them and how they can attach it to some group and say, hey, I've got the right position on this because I'm loved by the police union or the border patrol or the evangelicals or whatever.
	That's what they do with every one of these issues.
	So she comes back and she presses them on this.
	She says, 38 seconds left.
	President Trump, will you take any action as president to slow the climate crisis?
	The climate crisis, which is believed by slow people.
	Trump, well, I want absolutely immaculate clean water.
	Oh, there we go.
	He wants clean water. That's great.
	Biden evidently doesn't want clean water.
	And I want absolutely clean air.
	And we had it.
	We had H2O, he says.
	Wow, they had H2O. Did you realize that it was Trump who gave us water?
	No wonder they call him the Messiah, the chosen one.
	He gave us H2O. This is what I'm saying.
	If it had been anybody other than Biden who's just staring out into space, everybody would be talking about what Trump said.
	We had immaculate clean water, absolutely clean air.
	We had H2O. We had the best numbers ever.
	We were using all formats of energy.
	All forms. Everything.
	All forms of energy. He said, I had the best environmental numbers ever, and my top environmental people gave me that statistic just before I walked out the stage, actually.
	Of course, he doesn't cite any statistics.
	Maybe he can't remember those numbers.
	I don't know. Total incoherent rambling Bolshevik.
	He avoids the climate gaslighting issue altogether.
	Offer clean air and clean water.
	We had H2O when I was president.
	Biden responds, I don't know where the hell he's been.
	The idea that Dana, he said, is true.
	I've passed the most extensive, it was the most extensive climate change legislation in history, in history.
	And by the way, black colleges, I came up with $50 billion for historic black universities and colleges.
	Here we go. All right. Just pivot off to something else.
	And by the way, while we're talking about climate change, let's change the subject to black colleges.
	Why? In a sense, there's a certain kind of logic there.
	Why? Well, because both DEI and ESG are something that his administration has been primarily focused on to virtue signal to its supporters.
	So yeah, I can see where those two would be linked in his mind.
	And then he says, and he had not done a damn thing with the environment.
	He said, out of the Paris Peace Accord, I mean Climate Accord, I immediately joined it.
	Because if we reach for one and a half degrees Celsius at any one point, again, I'm reading it verbatim, if we reach for this, he says, well, there is no way back.
	No way back. He said, the only existential threat to humanity is climate change.
	Wow. So the pandemic is no more, is never existential threat.
	I mean, we still got the WHO and Robert Redfield and all these people telling us it's another existential threat to us.
	A nuclear war that you're pushing?
	That's not an existential threat to us?
	You want to talk about global warming?
	Talk about your jets and your bombs and your nuclear war?
	No, he doesn't talk about any of that.
	But he's going to genuflex to these signals of virtue that are there.
	And again, the Paris Peace Accord, Trump comes back to that.
	The Paris Accord, he said, this is Trump, was going to cost us a trillion dollars and China nothing.
	It was a ripoff for the United States, and I ended it.
	No, you didn't.
	You kept it going for the entire four years that you were there.
	Again, he got out of it, quote-unquote, got out of it.
	We were never in it, folks.
	That was gaslighting, too.
	You don't get into an accord, into a treaty, if it hasn't been ratified.
	It was all pretense.
	Nobody ratified it.
	John Kerry said, Barack and I have self-ratified this back in 2015.
	We did it. We ratified it.
	Fortunately, I don't need the...
	I don't need the Congress to do gun control.
	I don't need the Congress to do a treaty ratification.
	Same kind of stuff that Trump said with gun control, they said with a treaty ratification.
	So it wasn't a legitimate treaty, but he pretended that he'd gotten into it, and then he had to go through a proscribed series of steps to get out of it, And we were out of the Paris Climate Accord, if you want to call it that, for less than two months.
	Because Trump never got out of it.
	And they continued to use that.
	So then Biden.
	We were the only ones of consequence who were not members of the Paris Accord.
	For two whole months?
	All of this stuff is nonsense.
	And then they get to a little bit about prescription drugs.
	Biden said, no, by the way, with regard to prescription drugs, one company agreed that they would reduce the price to $35, which I was calling for.
	One, voluntarily.
	I made sure every company in the world, every pharmaceutical company, cannot have to pay.
	What does that mean?
	He made sure that every pharmaceutical company in the world cannot have to pay.
	And there was some drug somewhere that he negotiated down to $35, he said.
	Well, even if that's true, he doesn't know what it was.
	And yet, both he and Trump gave Pfizer, Moderna, other companies, tens of billions of dollars.
	Gave them, gave Johnson& Johnson manufacturing facility.
	That's what Trump did. Gave these guys all kinds of money.
	Gave them the formula that had been worked out by DARPA years ago.
	Said, we'll deliver it for you with the military.
	No legal liability.
	I mean, you think about that.
	Why are the leftist socialists not outraged at this?
	That's one of the worst pieces of crony capitalism I've ever seen in my life.
	Tens of billions of dollars to poison people.
	Then when it comes to the war, Putin, Ukraine, Trump, as you heard, when Putin saw that, talking about Afghanistan pull out, when Putin saw that, He said, you know what?
	I think we're going to go in and maybe take my, this was his dream.
	Now, that was not Biden.
	That was Trump. The way that both of them talk.
	Yeah, Trump is not going to address this.
	He's not going to take issue with his masters, with the CIA. He's not going to talk about the coup in Ukraine.
	None of that. And so, Dana Bash says, well, I'm going to come back to you for one minute.
	I just want to go back to my original question, which is, are Putin's terms acceptable to you, keeping the territory in Ukraine?
	She says that to Trump.
	It says, no, they're not acceptable.
	No, they're not acceptable.
	So how's he going to achieve peace in one day if he doesn't accept Putin's terms?
	Do you really believe any of the promises that he's made?
	He's given 200...
	Now he starts talking about the money that Biden has given to Ukraine.
	He's given $200 billion now, or more, to Ukraine.
	He's given $200 billion.
	That's a lot of money.
	Well, Trump, why don't you talk to Mike Johnson?
	He seems to be hanging on to your coattails.
	He seems to be hanging on every word.
	You didn't use any of your influence to stop this latest massive spending bill giving money to Ukraine.
	You used none of your influence at all for that.
	He does contact the people in Congress and lobby them for this or that, but he didn't do anything to stop the funding of Ukraine.
	He didn't do anything to make sure that they were going to put money at the border.
	Could it be that Trump would like for there to be chaos and disorder to help him get in as president?
	Because that's what Reagan and his CIA handler, Bill Casey, did with the hostage situation in Iran.
	We actually had Casey go to Iran, work out the details in advance of what was going to happen with the Iran-Contra situation, and tell them, don't release these hostages until after Reagan takes office.
	And then we'll work with you on the spare parts for the jets that we gave the show of Iran.
	Things like that. Yeah, they are not working in the best interest of our country.
	They're working in their best interests.
	And so, again, Mike Johnson, Trump doesn't put any pressure to stop any of this stuff.
	But he says, this is Trump again, every time that Zelensky comes to this country, he walks away with $60 billion.
	He's the greatest salesman ever.
	Lynn, listen to this. And I'm not knocking him.
	I'm not knocking anything.
	Why? He doesn't want to go head-to-head with the CIA, who's really the ones pushing this.
	You know, Biden is doing it, but he doesn't want to, he'll criticize some of the way that's being run, but he's not going to go to the root of the issue, because then he'll be going head-to-head with his CIA masters.
	So I'm not knocking Zelensky, I'm not knocking him, I'm only saying, only just saying, just asking for a friend, I don't know.
	So he says, and I will have that war settled between Putin and Zelensky as president-elect before I take office.
	I'll have that war settled.
	Wow. So he's not even going to do it in one day when he becomes president.
	He's going to do it before he becomes president.
	Well, what are you waiting for?
	If you can do it before you become president, why don't you do it now so we don't have to worry about this kicking into a nuclear war?
	Well, because he's just blowing hot air.
	And because even if he could do something, just like Reagan, he would wait and use it for his own personal advantage.
	Do you think he'll stop when he takes Ukraine, says Biden?
	What do you think happens to Poland?
	What do you think happens to Belarus?
	What do you think happens to those NATO countries?
	Here's the domino theory for dummies again, in case you never figured that out in the 1960s.
	This domino theory stuff, okay?
	And again, talking about NATO. Trump wants to get us out of NATO. Our NATO allies have produced as much funding for Ukraine as we have.
	And of course, that's what Trump was doing when he talked about, well, we need to get out of NATO. He was just telling them, you've got to get your spending up or we're going to get out.
	What Trump was doing during his term was he was getting the European countries to ramp up their military budget to prepare for this conflict, which was planned.
	Which was planned?
	The rest of it. She said, yeah, it's got three years before it happened.
	In 2022, we're going to have a bigger war with Russia.
	You think maybe they're planning it on both sides?
	Was there a conspiracy on both sides to do this?
	So, it was never about getting out of NATO. Trump is only about ramping up NATO's spending.
	I'm Marty. Hey, Marty, thank you for the tip, and thank you for helping.
	He says, here's movie, snack bar, popcorn.
	Thank you. And Dustin Helm, thank you very much for the tip.
	My son says, Trump says, Zelensky steals billions of taxpayer dollars every time he visits.
	Not that that's a bad thing.
	I just think it's very impressive.
	It's an example for all of us politicians.
	Exactly right. Exactly right, yeah.
	Not a bad thing. I'm not knocking it.
	I think it's good if you can rip off the American taxpayer for $60 billion.
	Israel does it all the time.
	Why can't Zelensky do it as well, right?
	Yeah. DG8. David, they'll install whomever they can get their agenda through.
	No way the COVID nonsense gets legs under Biden.
	People are too busy making excuses.
	Trust the plan. Keep your enemies closer.
	3D chess. That's right.
	It's going to be easier for them now to switch it back out again.
	And so, here's what I would say.
	Look at this stuff he said.
	And we'll talk to Shiva Adore today.
	He did the same thing that RFK Jr.
	did, which was to, in live format, give his answers to the questions, so forth.
	But if I was on the stage with him, I would look at those two old men, and I'd say, you both killed children with your shots.
	Now, you may not answer for this in this lifetime, but you're going to stand before God, and you will answer for that.
	I'm confident of that.
	Top scientists confirm COVID shots cause heart attacks in children.
	Heart attacks in children.
	And these people have the audacity to talk about, yeah, that was a mandate, that was a bad...
	No, the bad thing, Benedict Donald, was the fact that you gave heart attacks to children.
	Never happened before you.
	Never happened before you.
	Maybe we should call it trumpitis.
	Trumpiditis instead of pericarditis or myocarditis.
	It's trumpiditis. A comprehensive study by leading pediatric scientists has confirmed the devastating surge in heart failure among children is caused...
	A peer-reviewed study published in the prestigious journal MED conducted by scientists at the University of Hong Kong.
	They uncovered evidence to confirm that natural killer cell activation by mRNA injections causes the pathogenesis of acute myocarditis.
	Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle that restricts the body's ability to pump blood.
	This inflammation can cause strokes, cardiac arrest, and can ultimately cause sudden death.
	Before Trump, and before the Trump shot, before his killer shot, we never had a prerequisite in any school's Of requiring kids to get an EKG, electrocardiogram, before they could play sports.
	Now you've got a lot of school districts that are doing it.
	A lot of others don't care. They just drop dead.
	It just happens. It's normal now.
	Just like autism is normal after Reagan and Fauci.
	Now after Trump and Fauci, heart attacks in kids are normal.
	That's why these people have given us autism, given our kids autism, heart attacks.
	Have you had enough of these people?
	I am so disgusted with this idea that we're going to fix Washington with either Democrats or Republicans or with any politician of any party.
	Washington has to be reduced in size.
	It is a tumor.
	It is a metastasizing cancer itself.
	The study concludes that mRNA shots massively increase the risk of myocarditis among children and young people, especially males.
	And you know why they focus on that?
	Children, young people.
	Why? Well, because whenever you have somebody who's older that drops dead suddenly, it was their age.
	It was their age. But when all this fantasy was being pushed by Trump and his administration, people who were at or beyond life expectancy who had multiple comorbidities on average two and a half, and this is the same data that we had for two weeks out of Italy before Trump locked us down, and then we found that it was exactly the same everywhere else.
	These are people who died Again, past life expectancy, also had two and a half comorbidities, but it was always COVID that killed them.
	Always COVID. And so when you have somebody who dies of a heart attack, well, even though they got a comorbidity of having the vaccine, that doesn't count.
	It had to be something other than the vaccine.
	They can't deny it with children and with young people.
	That's something we've never, ever seen before.
	And so that is the big issue.
	That's why they're focusing on this.
	But it's not just killing children and young people.
	It's killing people of all ages.
	Trump is. Trump is still killing people.
	And he is celebrated by the MAGA crowd.
	It just blows my mind.
	Never will I celebrate this man.
	Never. He needs to be in jail for the rest of his life.
	He and the people around him.
	The study's co-lead scientist, a specialist pediatrician at the University of Hong Kong, collected and analyzed samples from 60 adolescents with vaccine-related myocarditis.
	You know, they had this big debate and the Trump people got so angry because Biden said, I never, no soldiers died in my administration, so we forgot the 13 that got killed in Afghanistan.
	This is just in Hong Kong.
	60 adolescents.
	Who died from heart attacks with mRNA just in Hong Kong.
	Just in Hong Kong. How many tens of millions of people have Biden and Trump killed?
	Poisoned. These backstabbing poisoners.
	Trump and Biden.
	Disgust me. Yeah, he doesn't remember the 13 soldiers that died because of his incompetence and getting out of Afghanistan when they lost.
	But he doesn't even care and will not admit to the tens of millions of people that he's killed, including children with heart attacks.
	Neither of them. The findings were compared with samples from 10 vaccinated individuals without myocarditis and 10 healthy controls.
	The study team investigated the previously rare but now very common vaccine-related myocarditis.
	So, again, he brought that to the world.
	Another thing they were totally silent about was gun control.
	Gun control. Nothing talked about the pandemic.
	Nothing of any substance, just some boasting about vaccines from Trump and attacking Biden on the mandates.
	You know, Trump has finally picked up on the talking points that the MAGA crowd was using to give cover to this murder.
	And it wasn't just the MAGA crowd.
	They were getting it from people like Alex Jones and Wayne Allen Root and all these, you know, prostitutes and parasites that have attached themselves to this MAGA cult and Donald Trump.
	And so he regurgitated some of that stuff, but they had no discussion of it.
	They had no discussion of what's going to happen to our ability to own cars or to eat meat.
	Nothing about any of that stuff.
	Why were guns absent during the presidential debate?
	Well, again, that's a rhetorical question because both of these guys, these two guys, the only two presidents who've tried to do gun control by executive order, and even Trump's Supreme Court slapped him down on it.
	When Surgeon General Vivek Murthy declared so-called gun violence a public health emergency so close to the debate, Tom Knighton at Baring Arms said, I figured he was trying to set the stage for President Biden to swoop in and make a stand on an issue that Democrats really seem to think they can win on.
	But then it didn't happen.
	Yeah, then it didn't happen.
	Well, Dougalock, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, thank you, David and crew. Let's all hit the like buttons and help spread the word.
	Yes, thank you for helping us.
	Thank you for reminding me to remind people.
	You know, it was interesting.
	People were talking about the censorship.
	I had a couple of articles about censorship.
	I thought, well, let me just go back and look in the search engine and see what happens.
	I type in David Knight, journalist.
	And I did it in Brave.
	Brave has got now an AI connection where it puts stuff together.
	It gets interesting results.
	And Google. And so I looked at him, and the first hit was a guy who is a David Knight, who was a journalist professor, I think, somewhere in the Pacific Northwest.
	And my Twitter did not show up, but his did.
	I looked at him. How many followers has he got?
	900. 900. You know, on Twitter, I've had now since they shadow banned me six years ago, 2018.
	I've been stuck at 136,000.
	But I had 136,000 and I had interaction with people before they banned me.
	Nothing has changed since then.
	Even to the extent that somebody with my name, who has 900 followers, Karen said, I've even got more followers than that.
	Somebody who has 900 followers turns up in the search engines before I do.
	So we're heavily banned, and again, we really do need your help to try to spread the word.
	Liking the program, some of that stuff does help.
	It helps on the podcast things.
	And it's difficult to stand out in the podcast when there are so many people.
	And there's some that are being promoted heavily by the platforms.
	You know, Spotify pushes Joe Rogan significantly, of course.
	They pay him $25 million a year, something like that.
	And they won't even let me on Spotify, the biggest podcast platform I can't even get the program on.
	So it does help more on these other ones.
	You know, the one that comes up first is Deezer.
	Deezer comes up first.
	Very interesting. But, yeah, the other thing that I thought was really strange was the only thing that it said about me, first of all, it kind of conflated me with this journalism professor.
	But then when it started talking about me and how I had been at Infowars, it said that I had interviewed Alexander Dugan, and I had written an article, and it gave the name of an article, and wherever his publication was, all of that was fictitious.
	That's what artificial intelligence is good for.
	You can make up all that stuff.
	But I think it also kind of highlights who I believe is behind all this censorship.
	Especially mine. I think that it is the intelligence community that is behind all the censorship.
	They designed the internet for this stuff.
	JCR Licklider and others designed it as a psychological manipulation tool.
	They were running and had their own venture capital firm, made it public.
	The CIA did.
	They had people, the CIA, NSA, other intelligence agencies had people all over these venture capital boards to determine Who the competitors are going to be and then let them fight it out amongst themselves.
	May the best person win, but they're going to give them the money for that.
	They have been behind all of this stuff from the very beginning.
	And when you look at the 2018 censorship when they took us off at InfoWars and when they then two months later, before the midterm elections of Trump, they took off 800 sites.
	And they were not, for the most part, the majority of them were not Trump supporters.
	But they were against the police state and the surveillance state.
	So you want to know who's censoring people?
	It's the police state and the surveillance state.
	It's the people that they censor.
	You can pretty much tell, going back and looking at that.
	Carlos Rex, thank you very much for the tip.
	And Brian Taylor, thank you.
	And he writes, I was listening to a guy yesterday...
	Talking about the media going after Alex Jones and basically said anyone who called out Alex for being controlled opposition was a basement dweller.
	No, actually, I dwelt with him, actually.
	I was a roommate, if you want to talk about it, so I think I know what I'm talking about.
	I just love it when people tell me, you don't know anything about it.
	It's like, I worked closely with him for about a decade, okay?
	I don't get how people don't see he is controlled opposition, as you pointed out.
	It says a vax is sugar water.
	Yeah. Yeah, you might look at the fact that he brags about how many people in his family are in the CIA as well.
	To me, that's the big tell.
	Handy. Yeah, we had a 17-year-old high school kid drop dead playing flag football.
	Yeah. Thanks, Trump.
	Biden, that's up to you guys.
	That's on your punch ticket, you know?
	It's interesting, you know, when you look at the Bible, both Old and New Testament, it always talks about God and having a set of books over and over again.
	It talks about that. And I think it's interesting, and of course, you can interpret these near-death experiences any way that you want to interpret them.
	There was one guy who was a Christian pastor, and he said, if you go back, and some of these were really pretty amazing people from a different culture, and they saw these things that were not at all like their culture.
	It wasn't something that they were imagining, because it was totally alien to them.
	And certain things would be said.
	And they were like, what was that about?
	And then they just might by accident be invited into some kind of a church service or something.
	And then when they come in, it's what was said at that point in time.
	Now, you know, we base what we're looking at and what our hope and confidence is in something solid.
	And that's the Bible is the Word of God.
	And I have a lot of confidence in that for a lot of different reasons.
	There's internal things that you can have confidence in that that is God who's speaking to us.
	Prophecies are fulfilled. Archaeological things are fulfilled.
	This one guy said, you know, I think some of this NDE stuff, near-death experiences, might be a kind of new...
	Apologetic for us.
	In other words, just as we used to not have archaeology as an apologetic, we used to not have DNA as an apologetic.
	And what made me think about that when I see that is people would always say they met this guy with a book in his hand.
	And over and over again, both the Old Testament and New Testament, it's always there, God recording both the good and the bad.
	We were just reading last night in Habakkuk, and this is really rough criticism of the people that were there, Israel at that point in time.
	And then it says at the very end of it that some of the people took note of what was said.
	They were going to change what they were doing.
	And I said, a book was written.
	And the book was written in those people's names.
	You know, God pays attention to what we do.
	You're going to answer to God one day.
	Now, we've all already blown that.
	And unless you've got something to forgive your sins through Christ, you've already blown that opportunity.
	But if you are there, and if you have taken care of sins, you can't do good to erase that.
	There's not anything that's going to erase that except for the blood of Christ.
	And if you, once we die, we're all going to stand in front of God.
	And the good and bad is going to be there.
	And guess what? The good isn't going to outweigh the bad.
	But you can know that the good is going to outweigh the bad if it's Christ's works on your behalf.
	That's the difference.
	If you're going to stand there on your own good works, as Donald Trump has said, that's just a pathetic future awaiting you.
	But you can know that the good outweighs the bad if the good is Christ's good that is on your side, only if you're a follower of Christ.
	But everybody's going to have those books open, good and bad.
	So, Tom McDog.
	In my whole only knew of one person with myocarditis, now I hear about it all the time.
	Not a coincidence. That's right.
	It's become a household word, just like autism.
	Myocarditis, pericarditis even as well.
	Biaslov says, and they want to increase uses of mRNA in children's scheduled vaccines.
	So many people do not see it.
	As a matter of fact, so many people do see it, in a sense, that the CDC has now added the COVID vaccines to the childhood vaccine schedule, and they approved it and pushing it for everybody, everybody, before we get to fall.
	This is CDC pushing this stuff now.
	Remember the CDC, this woman who's in charge of it, she was the North Carolina Department of Health Person, she said, I get on the phone and I call up my friends in other states.
	Are you going to let them do this? Oh, well then neither am I. What about that?
	Okay, well, I guess we'll let them do that.
	Yeah, science, right?
	Science. Johnny Freedom.
	I'm seeing people in their 50s dropping like flies.
	Otherwise healthy, yeah. Handy.
	I saw more young people die suddenly in one week during the jab rollout than I had ever seen.
	18 years in EMS had only two die like that.
	I had three in one week at one point.
	That's what I mean. And these guys just, you know, nobody asked them that question, but they will be asked that question.
	Cervantes Galan, I was on Twitter for about four years and never grew my subs more than 1,800 followers before they nuked me January 8, 2021.
	I tried to appeal it on Elon's new free speech platform and was denied.
	I haven't even tried to appeal it because I just don't have any confidence in that.
	The only thing we're thinking about was maybe we might try some kind of a new Twitter account just for the David Knight Show.
	Right now I'm on Twitter as Libertarian.
	We put up a David Knight Show Twitter account or something like that.
	Maybe we'd be operating under the new rules.
	I've got a black mark on me.
	I've been identified by AI as somebody who's a Russian agent, obviously.
	When you look at that.
	I was getting that stuff.
	I interviewed...
	I didn't write any articles for Alexander Dugan, and I interviewed him once.
	It was a very interesting interview, and I played it once on this show after the war started because I thought it really surprised me what his perspective was.
	I was expecting him...
	To be very anti-communist because he was very much about traditional Russia and he was very much about the Russian Orthodox Church and recouping all of that.
	And so I thought he was going to be very critical of Lenin and of the communists.
	And he wasn't. And it's like, how does he hold these two things together?
	It's mutually exclusive ideas.
	You know, how does he do this double-think?
	I thought that was really fascinating, this blindness, this double-think blindness, which we see in people all the time, especially when it comes to politics.
	No, no, no.
	Lenin made a lot of mistakes, but he was part of our history and our culture, and I embraced that and all this kind of stuff.
	I was like, well, okay, whatever.
	But I interviewed him once. But that's the crowning achievement of what I've done according to artificial intelligence.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	The Common Man Common Man.
	you They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Well, I want to thank the people who This is last week of June.
	The people who sent contributions by mail.
	Christopher S., Matthew H., Jack H., Paul D., Mark C., James F., and Edward C. Thank you very much.
	Appreciate that. Well, let's talk a little bit about climate.
	I was going to talk a little bit about follow the money.
	And, of course, there's many ways that we can look at the financial corruption, how these people have bought out Trump and Biden.
	Interesting article that I saw on Winepress.
	You want to know the difference?
	You want to know the difference between Biden and Trump?
	Well, Biden has close ties.
	And it's run by BlackRock.
	Trump is close ties and it's run by Blackstone.
	There you go. The difference between the two of them is the difference between a rock and a stone.
	A rock and a hard place.
	That's the difference between Trump and Biden.
	And, of course, there's a lot more about Biden that is not being talked about.
	It's not just the $10 million and all the stuff that they found in Hunter's laptop and the 10% for the big guy and all the rest of that stuff.
	Now, John Solomon mentioned it last week.
	I haven't seen much more about this, but John Solomon is not somebody to make Wild allegations to be sensational.
	He does thorough work, and he says he found another $120 million, $120 million in the Biden crime family there.
	So I think we're going to hear more about that.
	And in addition to that, just to summarize some of the follow-the-money stuff, The Bidens bought a house, and they got it in the 70s, about $185,000 in the 70s.
	And of course, we're talking about inflation.
	And they sold it in the 90s for $1.2 million.
	And I looked at the dates and said, well, how much of that is inflation?
	Well, the $185,000 would have been worth about $500,000 in the 90s due to inflation and devaluing the currency.
	And yet they sold it for two and a half times that.
	Raised a lot of eyebrows.
	But even more interesting...
	It's the fact that they, the house that they're in right now, they refinanced, I believe it was 20 times they refinanced it.
	Like, why would they do that?
	Here they are, multi-millionaires, and of course you always ask yourself, how did somebody like Barack Obama, who never had a job except as a community organizer and as a politician, we know what the salaries are of the politicians, how did he become a multi-multi-millionaire?
	How did Biden become that?
	I mean, his wife is a schoolteacher, he's a politician, he came from a poor family, just like Barack Obama.
	Now these guys have got tens or hundreds of millions of dollars?
	Huh. Okay.
	That's a rhetorical question.
	How did they get that? But then the weird thing about Biden and refinancing his house is, why does he refinance it 20 times?
	And somebody asked ChatGPT that.
	And ChatGPT said, this is a strategy for laundering money.
	You can refinance the house and keep going further and further into debt with it.
	And if you've got some hidden or illegal stream of money, you can pay the mortgage off with that illegal stream of money.
	And so, you know, more may come to light about that.
	But yeah, it is about the money.
	Just take a look at how much money is being sent to politicians.
	And that's all of them.
	We just had the most expensive congressional race ever.
	Jamal Bowman versus another Democrat.
	And it was $23 million total.
	I think 14 of it was the guy who beat Jamal Bowman.
	Because Bowman had sided with Hamas and the other guy had sided with Israel.
	And so huge amount of money that flowed in there.
	That seemed to be the key issue there in that district.
	And $23 million for a congressional race.
	You look at Mike Johnson, $80 million in his first full quarter as Speaker of the House.
	And again, going back 24 years, the entire campaign of Al Gore running for president was $70 million.
	And in one quarter, Mike Johnson gets $80 million.
	George W. Bush spent $100 million for the entire thing.
	Al Gore was complaining about that.
	Look, he's buying the election.
	The reason all this money is being spent is because H.L. Mencken said an election is an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	And that's your goods that they've stolen that are there in Washington.
	And they're handing that stuff out.
	And everybody knows that, you know, Washington is not only, the Federal Reserve is not only the reserve currency of the world, but it is the criminal horde of where you can go.
	And you can buy a politician, and you can get several thousand percent return on your investment.
	And so, of course, people are throwing money at them left and right.
	Throwing money at both sides left and right.
	Whoever wins, they win.
	Whoever wins, they get paid back 2,000, 10,000% return on investment by giving the money to these politicians.
	That's the corruption that is there.
	That's why you're not going to fix anything in these federal elections.
	Federal elections are useless.
	I wouldn't even bother to vote if it wasn't for local elections.
	Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	Governor Bill Lee has signed a bill calling for 30 days of prayer.
	Tennessee House Joint Resolution 1803 asking Stealth Patriot for prayer and fasting.
	What do you think? I think that's always a good idea.
	And this is something that's been done in the past, you know, and we can look at politicians' motivations.
	Maybe... Maybe what we could do is we could pray and fast that God will take these toll roads away that Bill Lee wants to put in.
	But seriously, as Paul said, he said some people preach Christ out of greed and avarice.
	Some people preach Him out of honest motivations.
	He says, I'm just glad that Christ is preached.
	So I'm just glad that people are praying and fasting.
	I don't know.
	There's no way for me to tell what the politicians' motives are.
	I have my suspicions, but it could be sincere.
	But I think there'll be a lot of people, regardless of the leaders and what they call things, there'll be a lot of people who are sincere in their prayer and fasting.
	And I think that'll make a difference.
	You know, God deals primarily with us as individuals.
	And we all stand before Him as individuals.
	But he also deals with nations, and you can see this over and over again in the Bible.
	You can see how he dealt with the nation of Israel, for example, or you can see how he dealt with Nineveh and sent Jonah there, and they repented.
	Or how he deals with Babylon or whatever.
	You know, he deals with nations collectively as well as with individuals.
	And so we should pray for the peace of the city that we're in.
	You know, we're here as sojourners and travelers.
	This world is not our home.
	We're not trying to set up a kingdom of God here on this earth.
	But at the same time, what God told the Jews who are in captivity, Babylonian captivity, He said, you know, build your farms and build your families and have kids and all the rest of the stuff and pray for the peace of the country that you're in.
	Even when you're in captivity, we should think about this situation that we're in now as a kind of captivity, I think.
	It really is.
	DGA, David, I asked my Trump supporter friends about justice for COVID tyranny.
	And none of them approve of Trump being held accountable for any of it.
	They say he was duped and they blame Fauci.
	I know, I've heard it over and over again.
	And who kept Fauci in?
	Who gave Fauci the podium?
	Who gave Fauci the medal on his last day in office?
	Who was afraid of Fauci and why?
	And of course, they'll also blame the mandate.
	I heard Laura Loomer say, well, these people took it.
	I knew better. I didn't take it.
	If you took it, it's on you.
	It's your problem. You know, Trump had the poison, and I've played that clip, and I'll never forget that from that one movie.
	It really stunned me.
	The movie is called, I won't even say the name of it, because you go back and look at movies that I watched 40 years ago, and it's like, oh.
	I don't want to recommend this.
	I don't remember anything about this movie.
	Except it was this crazy woman.
	And she's trying to find her way.
	She's having like some midlife crisis or something like that.
	She's cheating on her husband and doing all this other kind of stuff.
	But she goes in the kitchen and she's got this basset hound.
	And she pours milk in the bowl and then pours poison in the bowl and says to the basset hound, there's poison in that milk.
	I wouldn't drink that if I were you.
	And sits there and watches the dog.
	The dog sniffs it and walks away.
	Now, to me, that's what Laura Loomer is doing.
	Well, you know, there's poison in that vaccine.
	If I were you, I wouldn't take it.
	But, hey, if you're going to take it, it's on you.
	It's your fault, right? Why would you take it?
	Would it be because people are putting pressure on you?
	You can't work. You can't travel.
	You can't go to school. Can't do this.
	Can't do that. If you don't take it.
	You're going to be a second-class citizen.
	You're going to be locked down forever, maybe, they think.
	You had all these people hectoring everyone.
	Trump saying it's great, it's wonderful, take it.
	And these people will take the poison and look at what's happened to so many of them.
	I think that is one of the most reprehensible things I've ever heard.
	That kind of callous disregard for people tells you everything you need to know about these political whores like Laura Loomer and the rest of them, Tim Pool, grifting off of Trump.
	It disgusts me. It disgusts me.
	I worked with people like that.
	I know exactly what they're about.
	I want to have nothing to do with anybody like that.
	Nothing to do with any of them.
	Gem Z7. Obama has three mansions.
	One of them right on me.
	Doesn't seem to be a great thing for the climate.
	And one of them is in an area that they all say is going to be flooded.
	He doesn't believe it.
	He doesn't believe it. Oh, and he's not the only one that does that.
	But you can go to a website, and they'll tell you, yeah, the seas are going to rise, and here's the places.
	Look at how the coastline is going to be flooded in these people, meanwhile.
	Are spending exorbitant sums of money to build their mansions where if they believed any of this climate stuff, they'd be underwater.
	Well, let's take a look at the damage that's being done to the environment by these people who are so keen on saving the environment.
	Thousands of Joshua trees are set to fall victim to the green energy transition in California.
	Now, the Joshua trees are very rare, very special.
	I mean, I... They hardly classify as trees, in my opinion.
	When you look at them, they don't provide any shade in the hot desert.
	But, you know, hey, it's a unique thing, and they want to preserve it because of its uniqueness.
	I get that. But even as they have passed laws in California, it's there and protected under the Endangered Species Act.
	And yet, to build a solar farm...
	They're going to cut down 3,500 of them and then put up solar panels.
	How could that happen in California where it's protected?
	Well, they approved the project before they decided that they would protect the trees.
	Now, does that make any sense?
	I mean, we've seen dams that have been held up and everything because they came in and protected the snail darter or whatever.
	I don't buy that excuse for a moment.
	This is what they're going to do.
	The trees are estimated to be between 100 and 200 years old.
	Government approval of the solar project in 2021 predated a state decision to protect the Joshua Tree under the California Endangered Species Act.
	And last year, they had an enactment by the legislature of the Joshua Tree Conservation Act.
	So they've had two different laws, one of them specific to this very tree.
	It bans unpermitted killing of the trees.
	So, these trees are protected, supposedly, by laws.
	And yet, ah, we just can't do anything about it.
	We got this solar project that's going up.
	You know, when we were competing against Blockbuster, they came in to a town where we were working, and they had very restrictive signage things.
	They had restrictions about building codes, and...
	Lo and behold, they came in and they spent more than anybody had ever spent for a tract of land to do an out-parcel building.
	And they violated every one of these building codes.
	And the local paper talked about it.
	In Cary, North Carolina.
	And the response by the city was, well, we made a mistake.
	Yeah, it is a violation of all the building code here, but we had somebody in the planning department approved it now, and we can't do anything about it.
	It's like, oh, really? How much money did they pay you?
	Come on, give me a break.
	And that's what we're looking at here.
	You really think they can't or won't protect the Joshua Tree?
	How much money are they paying Newsom or these other people to get their project in?
	The developer is at pains to justify this solar project, citing his role in man-made climate change.
	He's all about the environment. Advantis is working to preserve native Mojave plants like the Joshua Tree, while also preserving California's ability to achieve its clean energy goals.
	So they're going to cut down 3,500 of them.
	3,500. Now, it's not just the Joshua tree, but it's other things that people get all upset about.
	The desert tortoises, that was a big deal at the Bundy Ranch.
	Or you have eagles.
	Eagles, right? Oh, don't you...
	You know, you get an eagle feather.
	Boy, that's big crime.
	Big felony. Oh, well, not for the people who are making the...
	Wind power, right?
	So the solar panel can kill the desert tortoises, they can chop down the Joshua trees, and they can put up these taxpayer-subsidized wind turbines.
	And they don't really care how many bald and golden eagles they kill.
	There is a Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, just like there is a Joshua Tree Protection Act.
	This one is federal.
	But in February, the Interior Department's Fish and Wildlife Service updated its rule for the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act under the category of incidental taking.
	That's like an accidental killing.
	Okay? Permits for certain activities under prescribed conditions, including qualifying wind energy projects, activities that may disturb breeding bald eagles and bald eagle nests.
	Well, okay, if your wind farm is going to chop up bald eagles, if it's going to create weird pressure things and stop them from being able to breed, that's fine.
	That's fine. By issuing permits for the incidental take of a bird, they acknowledge that some of the eagles will be slaughtered by the wind turbines.
	But that's fine. It's to be expected.
	And you know, we need to have a clean environment.
	You know, I mean, just look at how clean everything was under Trump, as I pointed out before, as he said.
	We had H2O. Well, you know, H2O, you're going to need a lot of H2O if you're going to mine lithium.
	Lithium has a dirty little secret here.
	Even though that's the key ingredient in these batteries that the entire world is going to have to run off of lithium batteries, When you mine this, it takes an unbelievable amount of water.
	And typically you find lithium in places where there isn't any water.
	Ironically, lithium extraction is associated with sharply negative environmental externalities, as it is with clean and green energy initiatives.
	An electrified economy by 2030, because again, that remains their goal, and they're saying we've got to speed things up to get there in 2030.
	An electrified economy in 2030 will likely need anywhere from 250,000 to 450,000 tons of lithium.
	By comparison, in 2021...
	The world produced only 105 tons.
	So we're going to need to have about maybe, you know, 4,000 times more lithium than we currently have, and we've got to ramp that up in six years.
	So we're going to need to cut some corners here when we mine this stuff.
	We're going to need to cut some corners when we do the heap leaching and all the rest of this stuff.
	We might wind up with fires everywhere, but of course that'll be the CO2's fault.
	It won't be the lithium battery's fault when that happens.
	Lithium extraction is typically extremely water-intensive, and it's often found in extremely water-stressed areas, such as South America's so-called lithium triangle.
	The chemicals involved in lithium extraction are extremely toxic.
	The release of such chemicals through leaching spills or airs emissions that can harm communities, ecosystems, and food production.
	Finally, the lithium industry presents key geopolitical issues in its current form.
	While most lithium is extracted in Australia and South America, almost all lithium processing takes place in China, creating a politically dangerous concentration of vital supply chains.
	So we're going to put everybody on lithium batteries.
	But all the lithium batteries are coming from China.
	Now, one of the things that they don't point out in this Zero Hedge article is why, if we are extracting the lithium in Australia and South America primarily, why is it going to China to be manufactured?
	Well, of course, it would be because it's cheaper in China.
	Why is it cheaper in China to manufacture?
	Because of the Paris Climate Accord.
	Because of the Paris Climate Accord, they can have as many power plants, and they're building them up really rapidly, as many power plants, as many coal power plants, cheap coal power plants that don't have any scrubbing, any cleaning at all on their emissions.
	They can build as many of those as they wish, and nothing done to clean or filter the output of that.
	Guess what? That means that their power rates are a tiny fraction of where they are everywhere else in the world.
	You see, this globalist agreement, the Paris Climate Accord, which was self-ratified by Kerry and Obama and Biden, and which Trump went along with and said, well, they ratified it, there's nothing I can do about it, and got out of it for two months after Biden was elected, and Biden immediately got back into it.
	So he didn't do anything to get out of it.
	That agreement there is set up by the globalists to transfer wealth and manufacturing to China.
	It's not about global warming, because if it's about global warming, then you don't want to have the offending power plants anywhere, right?
	That's what a lot of the environmentalists said.
	They said, well, that's crazy. Why would we give India and China a free pass on this if we're going to shut it down everywhere else?
	If global warming is an issue, if CO2 is an issue, It's an issue everywhere.
	They shouldn't be given a pass.
	They don't believe any of this stuff.
	This is simply an excuse.
	It's simply a MacGuffin for them to get rich, for them to starve us, for them to kill us.
	Scientists want to pour 60,000 gallons of sodium hydroxide into the ocean off Cape Cod to test carbon dioxide removal.
	That's lye. They want to put 60,000 gallons of lye into the ocean.
	And the EPA wants that.
	Let's talk about clean water.
	Let's talk about clean water when you've got people like the EPA and others pushing in fluoride.
	And of course, one of the things that they're worried about is our enemies, they say, might use cybersecurity attacks to mess with our water supply.
	I mean, what are they going to do?
	Dump fluoride into it?
	Are they going to dump lye into our ocean or something?
	We're already doing that.
	We're already doing that.
	So one critic said it'd do nothing to solve the root causes of the climate crisis.
	Instead, it puts at risk the ocean's natural capacity to absorb carbon.
	And the reason that they're doing this, and listen to the name of the project.
	They call it Locked Nests by the Woods Hole.
	Woods Hole is an oceanographic institution, but they call their project Loch Ness.
	And so they're doing this as kind of a proof of concept.
	These people are opposing it, not 60,000 gallons of anything in the ocean.
	It's really a drop in the bucket.
	I mean, it'd kill the fish in the immediate area and that type of thing.
	But it's really a drop in the bucket of the Atlantic Ocean.
	However, this is an experiment for them to do geoengineering on a large scale.
	And so they're going to put fluorescent dye into this stuff and the lye.
	And they're hoping that the lye will help them to absorb...
	CO2, the gas that they gaslight us with.
	And everything is about that.
	We've got to stop CO2 everywhere.
	Well, you know, 60,000 gallons of poisonous lye is not a big deal to dump into the ocean.
	0.04% of CO2 is not a really big deal to have that in the atmosphere.
	And only 3% of that comes from humans.
	All of this is nonsense, and yet the politicians, Trump included, will all play along with this.
	Researchers, they said, have no direct way of measuring how much carbon dioxide will be removed by the experiment.
	Measurements? Data? Do we do that anymore?
	We don't do that anymore.
	No, no, no. We are scientists, which means that they are bureaucrats who are looking for grants.
	They're not scientists. They're not doing science.
	They're not doing data. They're not doing measurements.
	We don't do any of that stuff anymore.
	The production of alkaline materials is extremely energy-intensive, releasing similar or even higher levels of greenhouse gases than they remove upon being dumped into the ocean, said the group.
	Oh, well, we're doing a little bit of thinking, anyway.
	It's kind of like that thing. Well, if we're going to let China and India have as many power plants as they're one of the two most populous countries on Earth, how is this helping anything if you're talking about it being man-made?
	And these people are saying, well, to create this lie...
	That's very energy intensive.
	And so you're going to be doing things that are going to increase the CO2 at the same time you're dumping.
	It's almost like the manufacturing process for the electric cars or something.
	How much energy and how many emissions have you put into the manufacturing of this car?
	Well, even more than you have with a normal internal combustion engine.
	So they said this is a dangerous distraction from the real solutions for the climate crisis.
	What's the real solution for the climate crisis?
	I point out that the emperors have no clothes.
	The scientists have no data.
	They won't show you the data.
	They're trying to hide the decline, all the rest of the stuff.
	This has been known for a very long time, going back to ClimateGate, which quote-unquote scientists around the world agree requires a rapid reduction in planet-heating fossil fuel emissions.
	Now, these quote-unquote scientists, and I'm going to say any scientists who want to push this stuff, they deserve air quotes around there.
	Title of scientist. They want to zero everything out, especially people.
	Especially people.
	Octo spook. Money allows you to break all environmental laws and all the other laws as well.
	We have certainly seen enough to know that.
	Dougalug says, I once knew an old black man that had gotten lie in his eye.
	Kind of spooky looking, all white eye.
	It was very, very corrosive.
	Very, very dangerous. People would use that to make soap.
	You've got to be very careful with that.
	The DOD, the Department of Defense, is turning plastic waste into food.
	This is a DARPA project.
	So you thought it was bad when they told you to eat ze bugs?
	Well, now they're going to tell you to eat ze plastic.
	DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, who are they at war with that they need to have plastic food?
	Well, you and I, right?
	The Pentagon is at war with us.
	DARPA has granted millions of dollars to researchers to turn military plastic waste into a bacterial protein powder that can be fed to humans.
	Now, here we are, soil and green.
	And, of course, you know, everything else, this is just the latest thing besides the GMO and the bugs, the GMO salmon and all the rest of this stuff.
	It never ends with these people.
	And I pointed out last week, they have Anika Biosciences.
	It's almost like Anakin Skywalker.
	They have genetically engineered bacterial spores to put in something to identify produce specifically by DNA analysis.
	You can't wash it off.
	You can't boil it or fry it or microwave it or steam it.
	And even your digestion doesn't get rid of this.
	So then they can look in the sewers to see what you're eating because they are so obsessed about everything.
	Just like the USDA now wanting to tag and track all the dairy cattle.
	Can't take them across state lines unless they've got a tag and a track and all the rest of the stuff.
	Well, they want to tag and track what you eat and they will look in the sewers to determine what you're eating.
	These people are obsessive beyond imagination.
	And I'll just end this section here with New York City Mayor Eric Adams.
	Shortly after he became mayor, I think it was about two years ago, New York is part of the C40s initiative.
	No meat, no dairy, no travel, except for, you know, no private cars, no plane flights, except one under 900 miles every three years.
	Three items of clothing per year.
	That agenda is And so, Eric Adams, who is the coming mayor, he said, all food is not created equal.
	We now have to talk about beef.
	And I don't know if people are ready for this conversation.
	Well, we're not. We're not.
	We're not going to let you steal our beef.
	End of story.
	You're not going to starve us.
	You're not going to kill us. We understand.
	We see what you are doing.
	And we're going to stop it at the local level.
	Here's the way. Here's one of them.
	End state involvement in federal climate change scheme.
	This is from the John Birch Society, JBS.org.
	They can help you with links to what is happening in your state.
	Regarding Agenda 2030 and how the EPA is bribing states to do what they want for climate change.
	They've got a chest of $5 billion, a bribe, to bribe the states and the local governments and tribes and territories to buy into this UN agenda.
	And only five states so far have not agreed to take the money and do what they want for the UN 2030 agenda. Climate.
	Those five states who have declined to participate are Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
	If your state is not one of those, Tennessee is not one of those, that means that they're being bribed by the EPA.
	This is how politics works, folks.
	In every issue, it works this way.
	If they don't have constitutional authority, rather than trying to fight this in the courts or fight other, they just give you money.
	Yeah, I'll give you this. It's just outright corruption.
	So again, JBS, John Burr Society says, rather than blindly going along with unconstitutional federal program that threatens state sovereignty and American values, state governments must withdraw from the CPRG program and all other federal programs.
	Furthermore, they must take solid action to protect property rights and prevent implementation of Agenda 2030.
	And so they have information at JBS.org to help you to find those bills, how to contact your state legislators, and now is a good time to do it because we've got elections coming up.
	And most of the states.
	Radice Bro, thank you very much for the tip.
	New czar for grooming the stool in the U.S. government.
	That's right. They're going to be grooming everybody's stool.
	Remember how they had to do that for George W. Bush when he was traveling?
	Get his poop. We can't let those riskies analyze his poop.
	They'll know something about him.
	Be able to figure out something about his health or something like that.
	It's like, oh, I don't... I don't think he had any health issues.
	I mean, he's still kicking around.
	But, you know, that's how obsessive they are about everything.
	And they want to know. They project this stuff on other people.
	Because they want to go around and analyze everybody's feces.
	They think that our enemies want to do the same thing to us.
	Maybe they don't.
	Johnny 17. I think they want Trump again to install CBDC. The second term of every president is always far, far worse.
	Far more statist. And yes, it'll put the people who would oppose.
	You go down the list.
	Of all the things that are part of the globalist checklist, because look, this next term goes from 2025 to 2029.
	They want to have their new society in place by 2030.
	So it's going to be in this next term.
	They're really going to put a push on.
	And when you look at whether it's the pandemic MacGuffin or the climate MacGuffin or whether it's a global digital ID, Trump can shut down the opposition to it.
	Just by his mere presence.
	That's the way it works with those people.
	Idiots. Idiots.
	Absolute idiots. CBDC is coming no matter who.
	The petrodollar is toast, says Apostle King.
	Well, I agree. By the way, let me tell everybody about DavidKnight.gold.
	I'll take you to Tony Ardobin.
	And to me, you look at how we have been preloaded by both of these presidents.
	For excessive spending, quantitative easing, there is an inflation bomb that is going to hit.
	But even more important than that is the CBDC stuff.
	I want to get out of their monitoring system.
	That's what is so important about gold and silver.
	To have something like that as a medium of exchange that is intrinsic wealth, that is completely hidden from them.
	They've just put in all new reporting rules for the different crypto exchanges and all the rest of this stuff.
	Crypto is so public in terms of all the stuff that you're spending.
	And so I want something that's going to be completely private.
	That's why I favor gold and silver.
	But if you want to do that, Tony Arterburn is a great guy to deal with.
	I've dealt with him for years. I've known him for years.
	Wise Wolf Gold. You can be part of the Wolf Pack.
	You can join a purchasing group.
	Get a quantity discount by being in there, and you can get in for as little as $50.
	You can go down to the $35 level.
	It's for kids, but, you know, you could do that, I guess.
	But, you know, from $50, and I don't know what the highest amount is, but he goes up pretty high.
	It's just setting aside each month purchasing of gold and silver in preparation.
	And so you can do that.
	You can buy large or small amounts of gold or silver, and he can help you with a metals IRA. And you can get to Tony at Wise Wolf Gold by going through davidknight.gold, and that'll let him know that you're coming through me.
	We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back
	Music playing
	you you Making sense.
	It's common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	And, of course, some of the charges against Trump.
	Isn't that interesting that we've got people that, you know, he's raised how many millions of dollars, I have no idea, off of his mugshot.
	Talked about how he was tortured as he got that mugshot, that little bit of time that he was posing for his picture.
	And yet we've had people who have been in jail now for years.
	Some of them still awaiting trial.
	Some of them picked up this year.
	And some of them sentenced to decades in prison.
	Well, there was a case about this.
	And, of course, Amy Coney Barrett.
	On the wrong side of the First Amendment again, she wrote the dissenting opinion, and Brown Jackson joined with the people that you would expect to vote conservatively, and she went with a squad.
	So it was six to three.
	And Brown Jackson, who would usually vote with the liberal Obama appointees, went with the five nominal conservatives, I guess we could say.
	And Amy Coney Barrett went with Sonia Sotomayor and Alina Kagan.
	And I played that clip of Barrett when she had the confirmation hearing.
	She was asked by Republican Senator Ben Sasse about the First Amendment.
	Can you enumerate the different aspects of it?
	She couldn't. And they asked her, can you tell me why would there be this stuff in there about free exercise of religion and free speech and protests?
	Why would they put all that stuff together?
	I really don't have any idea, she said.
	And now she's proven over and over again in her wrong opinions that she has written in many cases.
	Whether it's about social media censorship, now about this, that she neither knows nor cares to know what the First Amendment is about.
	She has no idea.
	You see, all this January the 6th stuff, this particular charge, the disruption of an official proceeding, that is a charge they're bringing against people that didn't do any violence.
	And that is a protest.
	You are allowed in the First Amendment to do a peaceful protest.
	Now, in her opinion, she said, well, it was an official proceeding, and they did disrupt it, so I guess it's an open-and-shut case.
	No, not unless your mind is closed to the First Amendment.
	It's not open and shut.
	One of the reasons Jacob Sullivan says the Supreme Court's decision centered around Joseph Fisher, a former Pennsylvania police officer who was charged with several offenses relating to the January 6th Capitol riot.
	And they said that he forcibly assaulted a federal officer, entered and remained in a restricted building, engaged in disorderly and disruptive conduct in the Capitol.
	However, they tacked on another charge.
	Using the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which criminalizes altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing a record, document, or other object, or attempting to do so with the intent to impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding.
	So, it wasn't that they were disrupting the official proceeding if Amy Coney Barrett, again, this is Trump's pick.
	One of the worst, if not the worst, pick for the Supreme Court I've seen in my lifetime.
	This woman, when she came on, she immediately attacked the free exercise of religion as Trump had locked people down, paid states to lock and governors to lock people down.
	She went along with that.
	She's been wrong on every aspect, pretty much now, of the First Amendment.
	Whether it's free press, free speech of the people, whether it is free exercise religion, whether it's the right to peacefully assemble, and also the right to redress your grievances.
	On all of these things, she has been on the wrong side.
	One of, if not the worst, pick in my lifetime from a Republican.
	I mean, the Democrats, they always get that.
	But, you know, when you get somebody that's supposedly a conservative...
	Well, anyway, obviously there were no documents that were destroyed.
	This guy was not doing any of that stuff.
	And so this obstruction of an official proceeding was not saying, we wanted to have this meeting, but you're getting in our way and you're disrupting the meeting.
	No, it was that you're altering or modifying or stealing or destroying documents.
	And that's what they applied to these people.
	That's how they're stretching this stuff.
	So he challenged that charge.
	He argued that the statute is written, requires the alleged obstruction in question be tied to the impairment of records, documents, or objects.
	Justice Jackson, Brown Jackson, sided with Fisher, and as Reason says, this shouldn't, in theory, come as a surprise.
	She is the only former public defender on the current court.
	In the judiciary, broadly, you're far more likely to find former prosecutors as judges.
	So it stands to reason that she understands firsthand the downsides of the government getting creative with criminal statutes as prosecutors are prone to do.
	Well, hopefully she will be on that side.
	We'll see what happens. Certainly, Barrett is not.
	And, you know, we look at somebody, we looked at the charges against this particular guy who took the Supreme Court case.
	If we look at Joe Biggs, for example, who I know and worked with, the charges against him, again, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of official proceeding, so those two should go away.
	Problem is that they put a bunch of other stuff in there, too.
	A conspiracy to use force.
	Seditious conspiracy.
	You see all this stuff? Interference with law enforcement during civil disorder.
	I never saw any pictures of Joe Biggs doing any violence.
	All the pictures I saw of him, he's walking through the place with a smile on his face.
	Just like Sam, who worked as a cameraman at InfoWars and they came after him.
	He's walking around with a camera doing reporting work, walking between the velvet ropes.
	And when you look at Big Charge of seditious conspiracy...
	These people should have all been pardoned by Donald Trump.
	They all went to follow Trump.
	They all went to support Trump.
	What did he do? He threw them under the bus.
	He let them be thrown into the jail to rot for life.
	That's his gratitude.
	He demands absolute, unwavering loyalty from everybody, and he shows no loyalty to anyone.
	Anyone. Not as subordinates, not as supporters, not as wives, to no one.
	No one. And so when you look at this, he could have, should have, pardoned them.
	If you look at the charge of seditious conspiracy, that goes back to the Civil War.
	That was put in there by some legislators who wanted to get vengeance against the Confederate soldiers that had surrendered.
	Andrew Jackson, as president, who had replaced Lincoln after Lincoln was assassinated.
	Did not want that to happen, and so what he did was he gave a pardon to all of the Confederate soldiers, ending it.
	Now, Trump could have done the same thing, couldn't he?
	Yeah. We also, they weren't charged yet with anything.
	We also saw Gerald Ford more recently do that with Richard Nixon.
	He pardoned Richard Nixon for any and all crimes that he might be charged with later on.
	Trump did nothing. Nothing.
	Nothing for his people.
	He ripped them off, stole $250 million from his supporters, gave them false hope, sent them to January the 6th.
	He and Alex Jones and the rest of those people who grifted off of them, who abandoned them, who ran to the other side of town when it all happened.
	Not me, not me. It's them alone.
	I just cannot.
	So much disgust for those people.
	Psalm 144. Thank you for the tip.
	Thank you very much. Hey, David, I almost forgot.
	I saw a short TikTok story.
	Don't remember the guy's name.
	About cobalt mining in Idaho.
	Didn't know if he knew anything about it or not.
	It seemed very disturbing.
	No, I don't. But that is a very, very dirty business.
	And the way they do it, Using children in the Democratic, so-called Democratic Republic of the Congo.
	It's just horrific what they do to those kids.
	And of course, cobalt is another thing that is necessary, like lithium.
	Big problems, big problems with the supply chain on this EV stuff.
	It ain't going to work. It isn't going to work.
	It's just there to create chaos and disruption and do it iteratively, as Fauci said.
	It's not a solution.
	It is a disruption.
	LT, Oracle of Truth, SCOTUS just sent Trump immunity case back down to the lower court.
	Oh, well, it just came out there.
	It's a hot potato. We don't want to deal with this thing.
	I knew they weren't going to do anything before the debate.
	I've kind of figured that they were going to drop it on Friday, so they dropped it today on Monday.
	It would have been a little bit smarter for them to just let go of it on Friday, because, you know, Friday is a...
	Slow news day. A lot of people don't pay any attention to it.
	Do it on a Friday or a Saturday, especially when everybody's talking about the debate and Joe Biden.
	So they threw that hot potato back down.
	DGA, David, thank God we put all of our hope and trust in Jesus Christ.
	Yes. I couldn't imagine putting all their faith in this corrupt political system globally.
	I know. It's the craziest thing.
	And yet, as we see, today is the day that Steve Bannon is going to go to prison.
	And he is defiant about this.
	One of Donald Trump's favorite Goldman Sachs bankers, as a matter of fact.
	Just remember, that's where he comes from.
	Goldman Sachs.
	And, as usual, it's the hubris, the ignorance...
	The bombastic blustering of this grifter that really stands out.
	And that's what he's doing.
	I want to play this little clip.
	I think this is NBC. And they had an interview with him.
	And listen how this guy is trying to push for civil war.
	He's trying to push a civil war.
	He's trying to push this after the January 6th.
	He's still at it.
	Just before he reports to federal prison, one-time top strategist for former President Donald Trump Steve Bannon remains defiant.
	We only get stronger with this.
	We're not going to get weaker. We're a populist movement.
	After leaving his position as chief White House strategist less than seven months into the Trump administration, Bannon went back to his roots in conservative media.
	It's Saturday, 29 June, the year of our Lord 2024.
	That sounds familiar. Launching an online program he calls War Room, which has rocketed in popularity among the MAGA faithful.
	He's went ahead and ignited a bunch of fires under a lot of people, including myself.
	Mr. Bannon refused to testify.
	But his refusal to comply with the congressional investigation of the January 6th Capitol attack and alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election led to Bannon's conviction by a jury on two counts of contempt of Congress.
	The Supreme Court now refusing to delay Bannon's four-month sentence as he appeals.
	Why refuse to comply with the congressional subpoena?
	Because, first off, my lawyer told me when I got the letter of exerting executive privilege from the president, the J6 committee was not legitimately structured.
	So therefore, their subpoenas don't mean anything.
	No court has so far agreed with those objections.
	The January 6th committee's interest in Bannon stemming in part from White House records showing he talked to President Trump twice on January 6th as well as the day before, the same day Bannon said this.
	All hell is going to break loose tomorrow.
	All I can say is strap in.
	There were personal and private conversations that he's exerted executive privilege on.
	Bannon, who speaks regularly around the country.
	Are you prepared to leave it all on the battlefield?
	Well, first of all, Bannon, they shredded the Constitution.
	You didn't do anything when you were there in the White House.
	I guess that was your executive privilege that you didn't have to do anything about that.
	How dare you try to turn America into a battlefield for your own personal aggrandizement?
	And that's what's going on with this stuff, folks.
	This guy is an idiot.
	All he had to do was show up and plead the fifth.
	You want somebody like this as your general in a civil war?
	He doesn't know anything. He doesn't know anything.
	He's a fool.
	He is an arrogant, ignorant fool, full of hubris, full of himself.
	He is a Goldman Sachs banker.
	I would never trust him. His big money bags guy behind him is a former Chinese communist official that became a billionaire.
	And then because of internal politics, he's now a fugitive and a criminal.
	It's just amazing.
	This guy, Bannon, Goldman Sachs banker, he's been convicted of one crime after the other.
	His conviction with that we build the wall thing was nothing compared to the grift that he was involved with January the 6th.
	They want to talk to him because he got some phone calls from Trump?
	He said, two weeks before this thing happened.
	A recording of him talking again to a group of Chinese people associated with Guo and telling them, it doesn't matter what happens.
	Whatever happens, if we win or lose, we're going to say this is all corrupt.
	He is an agent of chaos just like Fauci is.
	And I understand that.
	The fact that Hunter Biden can blow off a subpoena from Congress, and he can hold a press conference in front of the building there where they're meeting, where they want him to testify.
	And instead of going to it, he holds a press conference, and I'm not going in there.
	And that's the same thing that Bannon did.
	And, of course, you know that Hunter is not going to have anything done to him, but Bannon will.
	Now, here's another thing. Does Bannon not know that?
	I know that. You know that.
	How could he not know that, right?
	How could he be that stupid?
	How could he be that full of hubris to know that there's a different standard that's going to be applied to him?
	And, you know, that's the only thing we can say.
	In his favor, the rest of the stuff is stupid.
	The rest of the stuff is he was scheming and plotting and bragging in public, as you heard there, and in private, as we saw with the released tapes, bragging that they were going to throw the election into disarray whatever happened.
	Before it happened, he was bragging that.
	And now he is saying, now we're going to have, this is the hill to die on, we're going to have to, it's liberty or death, we're all going to show up and fight.
	This is the kind of nonsense that he and Alex and Roger Stone and Trump were putting out there before January the 6th.
	I told everybody, you are a fool if you follow these criminals.
	And they are, they're criminals, they're grifting criminals.
	Stay away from them. The Progress Retort.
	Thank you for the tip.
	Writes, discovered regional planners, also known as MPOs nationwide, have access to $450 billion in climate action funding.
	Look up your nearest big city's climate action plan.
	I met Thomas Massey in May.
	He said, that's the fight.
	He knows. He knows.
	So sorry to see what happened with his wife.
	That was released during this program on Friday.
	No word as to what caused her death, but that's not the issue.
	The issue is such a great loss to him.
	I didn't realize that they had been high school sweethearts, that they had both gone to MIT and graduated and started a tech business Sold it.
	Became multi-millionaire.
	I did see some of the video that he put out talking about how he's completely off the grid.
	He's got like an old Tesla battery from a Tesla car that he uses.
	Solar power and things like that.
	And he's farming.
	But he certainly does understand what is happening.
	Texas Coast South.
	Banner is pushing for civil war, but he won't go out there and fire a shot.
	You better believe he won't.
	He's going to be one of these guys that runs to the other side of the country when it all happens.
	He's just there as an instigator.
	And I have nothing but contempt for these people.
	Jack Besobiet is another one.
	Another one of these guys.
	Stay away from these people.
	Michael Flynn. These people are intelligence agents.
	They've been a part of the intel community.
	They're grifting you.
	They're tricking you.
	It's always coming from those guys.
	Always. Always.
	How many times are they going to run this thing that, you know, it's just like...
	They just keep running the same play at the same idiots because they can't see it coming.
	They can't stop it. They won't stop it.
	It's just like, you know, like putting on the line, you got some guy who weighs 120 pounds.
	So they're going to run the ball at him every day.
	That's what the MAGA people are.
	They're lightweight targets.
	And they're going to run the ball at those guys every single day.
	And they got people like Bannon carrying that ball.
	And they're going to fall for it.
	I'm Marty says, Bannon can do a four-month standing on his head.
	He, like Trump, is playing the martyr card.
	Yeah, that's a big thing. He's so excited about it.
	His four-month stint will be another platform.
	Yeah. I paid the price.
	I went to jail. You people out there, you listen to me because I worked on my convictions.
	And it's like, yeah, well, this is the only conviction he apparently has.
	You know, two different types of convictions.
	You can have the kind to get in court, the kind you get out of the Bible, but they got the court kind.
	And then the Chevron issue here.
	And somebody made a comment earlier.
	Saying they thought this might come back and backfire.
	And of course, the Chevron thing actually has backfired from the very beginning.
	Chevron deference actually comes from the oil company called Chevron.
	But in a sense, it has, I think, kind of a double meaning because they use this as a way for the bureaucracies.
	That's a flag, a chevron that they would do their dirty work under.
	It gave them an excuse.
	And it began with the EPA under Reagan getting around some, interpreting some regulations and doing it in a permissive way.
	But since then, you've had all these different government bureaucracies say, well, we will go ahead and make up these rules for this.
	It's what Nancy Pelosi was talking about when she said, we've got to pass Obamacare so we can find out what's in it.
	The regulators and the bureaucracies were really going to fill in the devilish details.
	She wasn't going to do it.
	She's just going to give, that bill was just to give them all kinds of powers.
	And so that's what this address we'll get to in a second here.
	Tornator, thank you for the tip.
	I'd hate to spoil your plans.
	I went to see Horizon over the weekend.
	It was incoherent, disjointed mess.
	Oh, that's good to know.
	Okay, there was little to no character development.
	It was essentially just three hours of Indian on settler and vice versa violence with little to no context.
	Okay. If you want to see a highly entertaining action comedy, I highly recommend The Fall Guy.
	Not sure if it's still playing near you.
	We actually did go to see that.
	That's about the only movie we saw in the last...
	Four or five years, maybe.
	Last year, that's right.
	There's one other that we went to see.
	And then when Karen's brother was here, it was available online, and she said, oh, let's watch that.
	I enjoyed that, and we saw it in the movie theaters.
	She watched it, and she said, you know, it really wasn't all that good when I saw it the second time.
	But it was funny, and it had some good special effects, and it was good popcorn entertainment.
	Well, thank you. I'll take that into consideration.
	Maybe we'll change our plans.
	It's an awful lot of money to drop on something unless you're pretty sure that it's going to be good.
	So I thought they were just coming after Kevin Costner.
	I saw a review where this person came after him and said, last of the cornball directors.
	And they started talking about what they didn't like.
	And I thought, well, I like all those things.
	I like traditional stuff.
	I like the sentimentalism, the romanticism, the traditionalism, all these things that these people call cornball.
	And I thought, you know, maybe I'll go see that because it seems to me like what has happened, it came out of Hollywood.
	And now these values are kind of dispersed throughout our society.
	The idea that it's somehow cool to be cynical.
	The idea that we don't want to have good guys and bad guys.
	We want even the good guys to have a lot of bad in them.
	That's much more interesting, isn't it?
	And I really don't like that.
	I like the straight-up good guy, bad guy stuff.
	I like to have somebody to root for, and I like to hold up the ideals of what is right.
	So that's one of the reasons.
	It was actually that review that said, well, that's it.
	I'm going to go see it, but maybe I won't.
	And so, yeah, I read that comment there.
	So the Chevron difference.
	It empowered agencies to interpret ambiguous laws, as it states that courts should defer to an agency's interpretation of a law, as long as that interpretation is reasonable.
	And it goes back to 1984 ruling.
	Natural Resources Council came after Chevron.
	It represented a victory for the Reagan administration and a loss for the environmental groups.
	Now it's gone the other direction. Under Reagan, the EPA issued a rule that allowed manufacturing plants to install or modify one piece of equipment without obtaining a federal permit.
	Environmental groups challenged the rule, saying that it violated the Clean Air Act and would cause more air pollution.
	But the 1984 unanimous Supreme Court decision said that the court should defer to the EPA's reading of the Clean Air Act and other agencies' interpretations of other statutes.
	You know, it's kind of interesting. Here we are 40 years later and we didn't all die.
	Because the EPA let that one piece of equipment go through.
	All right, Shiva Ayodure is ready to come on.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to establish contact with him.
	Should be very interesting.
	We're going to talk about what didn't happen in the debate, what needs to happen, where we need to focus on fixing the problems in this country, because everybody knows we've got lots of problems.
	The only question is, what do we do to fix them?
	So Shiva's going to be our guest.
	Your guest will be right back.
	And I'm going to be right back.
	the
	you
	Thank you. Defending the American Dream.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, folks, joining us now is Dr.
	Shiva Ayyadurai. Glad to have him on.
	He's running for president. ShivaForPresident.com.
	Now, he live-streamed the debate on Twitter, like a lot of other people did, and gave his comments in real time, so we won't talk to him about the debate.
	But as I was talking to him off-air, he's very interested in talking about the Supreme Court cases and the First Amendment infringements that came from those, and I am, too.
	I've talked about them some on Friday.
	Thank you for joining us, Dr.
	Shiva. Yeah, good to be here, David.
	How are you? Doing good. Doing good.
	David, what I wanted to do was, as many people know, I was heavily involved, probably the centerpiece of the entire discovery of the fact that the government of the United States, in fact, all governments of the world, have a backdoor censorship portal into every social media company.
	Yes. In my 2020 case, David, you may remember, I uncovered...
	In courtroom testimony, the fact that the government of Massachusetts had...
	I've coerced Twitter, or Twitter would never have thrown me off had it not been for the government of Massachusetts, because I exposed the fact that the government of Massachusetts had destroyed ballot images, which is a violation of the federal law.
	When I went to do my own audit of how possibly I could have lost my election to a guy who had no lawn signs nothing in Massachusetts.
	Everyone can go to winbackfreedom.com.
	I don't want to go through that.
	I've talked about that extensively, but it was...
	My work, my representing myself in court, which exposed the fact, bare view to half a billion people all over the world, that the government of the United States, starting in 20...
	Well, it was Trump who created CISA, unanimously approved by both wings of Congress.
	Both wings of Congress, 99% are funded by AIPAC, right?
	Both wings of Congress supported the execution of a law which allowed the creation of infrastructure for government to coerce social media companies to do their bidding.
	Or more, probably better to have a collusion between social media companies and government as one entity.
	What some people call state imperialism, you know?
	So, that's what I uncovered.
	And most important was my case showed conclusively with evidence that the government coercing Twitter to do that.
	Period. And that's why I won my federal injunction in court.
	Now, except you, David, and a few other people who covered that case, none of the mainstream media grifters, including Glenn Greenwald, who I consider a grifter, and we can talk about it, or I call him Effer Carlson, right?
	I'll be kind on your show, right?
	None of these, they actually concealed it for two years.
	And they spoke about it in the so-called Twitter files, acting like they had discovered this.
	But the reality was they concealed it during the most important time when it needed to be brought out.
	That's what these guys always do.
	It's called the limited CIA hangout.
	All right. Anyway, after I exposed all of this, David, interesting enough, they found two other brown guys, people who look like me, Indian guys.
	One of them is a guy called Jay Bhattacharya.
	Mm-hmm.
	Out of Stanford.
	You know, my stuff was going viral, and this is what happens when an independent agent like me brings out the truth, or you, David.
	What they do is it's a very insidious technique.
	They don't want to give limelight to the independent people who bring out the truth.
	So what they do is they hide that truth, and then they put one of their controlled opposition people to quote-unquote hijack that finding and own it.
	And that's what happened. So these guys in Missouri versus Biden file a lawsuit.
	And I was very, very upset with Jim Hoff because Jim covered our cases from the Gateway Pundit.
	Never told me they were doing any of this.
	I saw that he was one of the plaintiffs.
	Exactly. And Jim covered our case extensively.
	Now when I read the case, because I read cases, I said this case is going to fail.
	It's set up to fail.
	Because they couldn't show directly at the government You know, at their bidding, social media companies did it.
	Now, why is this important? Because social media companies have their First Amendment right.
	Government also has First Amendment right.
	Okay? From the Constitution.
	The issue is, did Twitter do what the government wanted?
	Because Twitter would not have done it if the government didn't call them.
	You see? It's a very important thing.
	I have First Amendment rights.
	Government has First Amendment rights, and so does a company like Twitter.
	So it's a very important thing to show that if there is government forcing Twitter to do this, it's called state action by a very important ruling that you have to argue called Blum v.
	Yuretsky, which I argued successfully in federal court in Massachusetts.
	That's why I got my injunction.
	I won that. It's the centerpiece of the case.
	Now, after I won it and went on to the major trial, the judge was trying to bribe me to drop all the claims against the government.
	And he appointed me a lawyer who was colluding also with the judge and the government from all perspective.
	Okay? And I wouldn't accede, and then they tried to come after me.
	And that's why I actually filed a new case in December 2023 against the U.S. government, not just Massachusetts.
	So that case is live.
	Okay? Okay. But everyone needs to understand that I'm the one who has the actual evidence, David, that can stand courtroom testimony, which is, I have the case of the century which shows we have the courtroom testimony from the government, social media director of the government of Massachusetts, telling a federal judge, yes, I contacted Twitter.
	We didn't like his tweets.
	And when they took it down, we were relieved.
	Quote, unquote. It doesn't get any better than that.
	These clowns who filed Missouri versus Biden was flawed.
	And it's funny, they found two Indian guys who knew about our case.
	And you would think if they wanted to strengthen it, they would have referred to our case.
	Yeah. So why didn't they refer to it?
	So they set up a case where they filed it in, you know, Republican-centric federal courts.
	So they'd win those in the Fifth Circuit.
	But when it went up to the Supreme Court, Amy Coney Barrett destroyed it.
	Because she said, you don't have exact evidence of the government actually coercing social media.
	Because in the cases that they had, the social media companies already had these people on their red flag list.
	Right? But in my case, they didn't.
	I was never thrown off social media.
	You see? Yeah. So why didn't they include my case when it was so well known all over the world?
	We've seen this type of thing from the Supreme Court in the past.
	I've talked many times about, as they were putting in the National Firearms Act and other things like that, back in the 1930s, they had a guy to establish that act.
	They had a guy who was a convicted criminal, had previous convictions, Miller, and he had a sawed-off shotgun, and so they bring this action against him.
	And that was the case that they wanted to bring in.
	They argued that he couldn't have a sawed-off shotgun because it was not a military weapon.
	And he even died before the case was heard at the Supreme Court.
	They went ahead with it anyway, even though the guy was dead.
	It wasn't a moot case.
	You know, when you look at something like this and Barrett says, these people don't have standing.
	It's like, who had standing to decide a case of a guy that's already died?
	But when they want to establish a precedent, they'll do anything, no matter how ridiculous it is.
	You know, and I think that's what they're doing.
	What I'm saying here, David, is why didn't these lawyers, why didn't these people who knew about my case reach out?
	Why didn't they even reference it?
	They intentionally concealed our case in Massachusetts, knowing it was the landmark case here in Massachusetts.
	Why would you conceal it, David?
	That's the question. And the only conclusion you come in, either they're really, really dumb and incompetent, or it was done intentionally.
	That's the only two conclusions.
	Either you're dumb and you're an incompetent lawyer.
	On the most important case, knowing the history that I had revealed that, by the way, it was Trump who signed into law, SISA, which created that backdoor infrastructure, supported by both wings of Congress, you have this landmark case where we actually have The government telling a federal judge, yeah, I did it. I told Twitter to do this, and I was relieved.
	Courtroom testimony. Why would you not include that?
	When you knew this would go to the Supreme Court, you did it intentionally.
	Either you didn't want to give me credit because you're jealous, but it's quite interesting they go find two brown-skinned Indian guys to be the centerpiece of that.
	Mm-hmm. It's almost like a replacement strategy, but you don't bring out the most important findings.
	So Amy Coney Barrett, if you read her analysis, and I read it very carefully, she says, in order to show this, you need the evidentiary proof that Twitter or Facebook would not have done this without government intervention.
	You see? That's like the smoking gun.
	That's what we have. So why would you not include the most important piece of evidence?
	Yeah. You see what I'm saying?
	Oh, yeah. So they didn't include this because if you look at this, it was a 6-3 ruling by the Supreme Court, basically giving it to the government so the government now, and everyone should listen, this sets up a precedent ruling at the highest court in the land.
	So everyone else who gets thrown off social media by government intervention has to even go much harder Okay?
	Much, much harder because of what these fools did.
	I'm talking about the attorneys in Murthy v.
	Biden on the plaintiff's side.
	You can't just blame the Supreme Court.
	This was a setup. Right?
	So the Supreme Court handed it to the left, or whatever you want to call it, the swarm, as I call it, okay, by giving them saying that government can legally censor speech, and they're retroactively protected now, which is what I predicted would happen.
	This is very much similar to the telecommunications.
	They did it through Congress, where Congress gave a retroactive immunity to the when the government was using telecommunications companies in 2000, under the Bush administration, to spy on US citizens.
	They retroactively, Congress left and right got together, and they passed a rule to indemnify these companies.
	So that's what just happened here.
	The left and right, if you look at this, there's three, the far right got.
	guys on the Supreme Court, but the three, you know, Roberts, Coney Barrett, and others colluded with the left to screw over, basically they destroyed the First Amendment online.
	Destroyed.
	Now, the next day, what do they do?
	They passed a, they said, okay, but we're getting rid of the Chevron doctrine.
	Now remember, the Supreme Court ruling that they just did basically says any agency in the government, any government can silence the speech of you, American citizens, silently launder censorship through social media companies.
	It's okay. Because they've set the bar so high because of this ridiculous lawsuit that they did not include my findings.
	Purposely. Intentionally.
	That's what they did. They sabotaged the American people.
	I say it was deliberate. The next day, they then...
	The Supreme Court, again in a 6-3, the same set of people, right?
	rule to eliminate the Chevron doctrine. In 1984 in Chevron versus I think NRDC the question has been this Congress writes laws right the executive branch that's the legislative branch executive branch is supposed to enforce the laws and the judicial branch in the United States is supposed to interpret the laws okay mm-hmm so in that part sometimes Congress probably
	likely on purpose will write laws that are vague right Oh, yeah. That's been a standard thing.
	Pelosi said, well, I have to pass it to find out what's in it, right?
	Right. Let's say they pass laws that are vague.
	So, in the Chevron versus NRDC process, Historic precedent-setting case in 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in those instances, an agency which has subject matter expertise in that area, we will defer to that.
	It's called agency deference.
	It's a principle. So if the courts have to, if there's a law that comes to be interpreted in front of the Supreme Court, the courts, or any court, have to defer to the agency within the government Mm-hmm.
	Now, in the Fisherman's case, I think it was relentless, I forget the, there's two cases that came up.
	The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to strike down the Chevron Doctrine, which meant that Congress must put together clear laws, so you don't have to go through this interpretation process.
	But here's the deal, it's a shell game.
	Because you're moving away the corruption from the agencies, guess what, to the lobbyists.
	Because we know the lobbyists are the ones who are influencing Congress to write the laws.
	So, what you noticed was the right-wing libertarians or even the Republicans are like, oh my god, this is great.
	Chevron doctrine has been smashed.
	But if you go look at any of those people's Twitter feeds, they were silent.
	On what the government did 24 hours before...
	Sorry, the Supreme Court did.
	The quote-unquote, the Republican right-wing Supreme Court did to destroy free speech in the United States.
	So look at this. So in 24 hours, the Supreme Court passes...
	It takes down the Chevron Doctrine, which had flaws with it, to throw a bone to the Republican right.
	So they'd say, oh my God, great, we don't have the deep state now.
	And you can read those tweets and those Facebook posts.
	But those same grifters posting that, David, not one of them said anything against the same right-wing Republican court, which had just allowed every agency, government agency, the right to silent speech.
	Yeah.
	Destroyed the First Amendment.
	So on the one hand, they took down the First Amendment, the Supreme Court, and they threw a bone of, oh, we've taken away the Chevron doctrine.
	But we know that that corruption that ruled the agencies, all of the Chevron doctrine, is just going to get shifted and consolidated over to the lobbyists in Congress.
	Now, I can see this as bright as day because I take a systems approach, David.
	The non-systems people were out there, oh my God, we got this over here.
	What's like showing the monkey the mirror over here so you don't show the banana over here, right?
	The big elephant in the room is the Supreme Court destroyed the First Amendment.
	The right-wing Republican Supreme Court destroyed the First Amendment.
	And that same Republican right-wing Supreme Court threw a bone to the Republican right-wing saying, oh my God, this is great, you guys can gloat over the Chevron Doctrine being taken away.
	That's what happened, David.
	I agree. Well, I think that, you know, I agree that, you know, that is there as an appeasement to people.
	I think a lot of people looking at this, I've talked about the power of the bureaucracy and how it has grown over the years.
	I talk about regulation without representation as much as taxation without representation.
	I've got a couple of comments here.
	Let me pass these on to you and get your comment on them.
	AP RumbleSeat writes, maybe we need people like Dr.
	Shiva to establish Legal think tanks state to state.
	Well, that's kind of what you're doing with your educational classes, isn't it?
	Yeah, so who is that?
	Rumble? The user's name is AP Rumble Seat.
	I'm not sure. Is that on Rumble?
	Yeah, so AP Rumble.
	What we've done is we've created a very powerful...
	Movement. And the bottom line, you know, theme of our movement is save yourself.
	If you can see that, David, right?
	Save yourself on these.
	And then we tell people, David, on the back of these cards, look what's going on.
	This swarm is actually killing you.
	Lifespan is going down.
	Cost of living is going up.
	So our position, David, is that the individual in the United States, if you want to be a real citizen, must take responsibility for your life.
	Yes. Politicians are not going to do it.
	There's no savior coming to do that.
	The only person going to do that is you.
	You must save yourself. In order to save yourself, you've got to understand the way systems work.
	Now, the value that I'm bringing in my run for president and beyond that is to explain to people, look, I've discovered those tools.
	I have the tools. If you want to learn it, we're here.
	But if you want to... Outsource your future to one of these clowns, right?
	And all of these clowns, by the way, are agents of Israel.
	Every single one of them. They're all Zionists.
	And they've hijacked, by the way, Christianity, and they've duplicitly taken advantage of the American Christians to think that Zionism equals Christianity, which it isn't.
	But our movement educates people on the fundamental view that the future is up to you.
	And you have to learn how to fight.
	Now, I have created those tools.
	So that's what you're referring to, David.
	So in every state now, for that matter, all over the world now, we're in about 100 plus countries in the United States in every state.
	And our leaders who are running our movement, the first thing they're teaching people is if you want to vote for Dr.
	Shiva, you also have to be willing to stand up for yourself.
	It's not about him saving you.
	Dr. Shiva will offer you the analysis, the tools.
	I'll get on the ground and fight every day, David.
	I've been doing that all my life since I was 17 years old or 12 years old, you know, as an activist.
	But the American people need to rise up, bottoms up, and fight.
	And so if you looked at that debate that took place...
	You had one guy who's a complete liar, and another guy whose brain is mush, right?
	So one unethical individual finding a very unhealthy individual.
	And I was hoping that maybe the takeaway from that, you know, before it happened, there was one piece on reason.
	They said, well, maybe the best outcome of this would be if it was really, really bad.
	And it was really, really bad.
	And I was hoping, and I said it on Friday, I said it again today, I'm hoping that people will see that, as you point out, there is no savior coming.
	That's what I try to focus on all the time.
	Work bottom up.
	That's how we've got to do this, not top down.
	The top down is totally corrupt.
	And so I think that's a very important message that we both agree on, that we've got to work from the bottom up.
	And I do want to talk more about that.
	I've got a couple of other comments here.
	Let me throw these at you before we get into the debate.
	Texas Coast South.
	It'll never change as long as their federal fiat money system To corrupt all things like it has.
	What do you say about that? What about that?
	The dollar status is reserved and the petrodollar and all the rest of that stuff.
	Is that about to change? What do you think?
	Well, I think we don't want to put the symptom separate from the cause, okay?
	What has happened, David, for the last 50 years, and by the way, in the late 80s, there was an academic meeting of the leading scholars in the world.
	world, they got together in the East Coast. And a decision was made. And we can do a whole video on this, at this meeting, that in New York, that we must demoralize the American public, so they never build a bottoms up workers movement. Okay.
	And so starting from that day, to today, the effort of the elites has been to demoralize people to never actually get their hands go out on the streets and hand out flyers, mobilize the movement like we're doing for Truth, Freedom, Health, our campaign.
	They don't want working people out independently organizing, David.
	They don't want them doing that. So the viewers' comments there have two aspects.
	Yes, he's addressing...
	One of the many facets of corruption and ways that the swarm enslaves us through a fiat money system.
	There are many ways. They also enslave us by controlling the water supply and the food so people can't even think about the fiat money supply.
	They're losing their intelligence even to think about that.
	There's many, many ways that they shackle us.
	But regardless of that, the number one way that the establishment shackles us is to demoralize people to just pontificate all day, to talk about things, but never to get up and build movements.
	So if you think about a guy like Noam Chomsky, he writes a book called Manufacturing Consent, which is a detailed analysis of how the swarm controls us.
	But Chomsky demoralizes anyone from ever building a bottoms-up movement.
	So you'll see all these grifters on the internet talking, talking, talking, doing deep analysis.
	But they're not out there doing the hard, practical work of how you build a movement.
	Teaching people the tools and putting the onus on them.
	We're the only force right now on the planet doing that in a systematic way.
	So, I would encourage the viewer there, come to our open house.
	We'll teach you how to fight.
	What you're describing is a symptom.
	It's an obvious symptom.
	There are many things like that.
	But the root of it is that for the last 70 years, the American people have been demoralized to outsource their future to everything. To watch WWE wrestling all day, right?
	I agree.
	To vote for one of these politicians. And when someone like me comes along, bottoms up, it's so new, they're not even thinking, wait a minute, this guy's actually out there.
	We're actually collecting our signatures to get on the ballot.
	By the way, we're on the ballot in Utah.
	The first time a naturalized citizen is on the ballot in the United States for president.
	And people said we couldn't do it.
	So... And this goes to the heart of the founders of the United States, which believed in what...
	And a lot of people, a lot of...
	99% of the lawyers don't know about this principle called non-justiciable issues.
	The founders of the United States knew, the framers, that there would be issues that would come up that even their articles in their tenement, you know, the Bill of Rights, couldn't conceive of.
	So they had a room for non-justiciable issues, movements that would come bottoms up that would create new laws.
	Right? And this is why bottoms-up movements are central in the minds of the framers of the Constitution.
	They're in the subtext. So you had stupid people like Arnold Schwarzenegger, oh, you can't run for president, you're a naturalized citizen.
	Well, yeah, just pontificating you can't.
	But if you build a bottoms-up movement, and you say, wait a minute, I've got hundreds of thousands of people who want me on the ballot, that becomes a reality.
	Like anything, women didn't have the right to vote.
	Afghan women had the right to vote before American women.
	Well, there was a bottoms-up movement that was built, right?
	If you went to the late 1700s and you went to the federal Supreme Court and you said, hey, I'm a black person, I should be allowed into that white restaurant, they'd throw out the case.
	This is why we need movements.
	Movements came. We created the 14th Amendment, the 19th Amendment, and that's what we're doing, David.
	The framers knew this concept of non-justiciable issues.
	Well, I agree with you on the bottom-up solution.
	I absolutely do. I do believe, though, that there is a process for changing the Constitution that would be something other than a large movement.
	And let me... There's a couple of people have left a comment here about rights, and I'd like to get your clarification about this.
	I'll read their comments here.
	Texas Coast South says, only people have rights.
	When you work for government, you have personal rights, yes, but not rights to trample on others.
	And then, scroll down, let me get the other one that was there.
	Another one, Rational Lampooner says, We tell government what it's allowed to do.
	It has no rights of its own.
	Corporations are not people.
	I've said in the past, and this is my position on it, corporations are creatures of the state.
	They exist by government-granted privileges.
	It talks about the powers of the states and of the peoples.
	If it's not delegated, if the powers are not delegated to the federal government.
	So states have powers.
	Corporations are creatures of the state.
	They have privileges. People have rights because we're created in the image of God, as the Declaration of Independence acknowledges.
	So how do you see that fitting in?
	Well, David, it gets back to the earlier point you said as an aside.
	There are fundamental rights that exist independent of all government.
	You know, divine rights of people, and I think the founders had this in their notion, right?
	Inalienable rights. So, that's a central piece there.
	Now, in the manifestation of the United States and laws, etc., right?
	How these are translated, there's three ways these...
	We get our rights.
	And this is something everyone...
	No rights are given to us because they're just inalienable.
	We as human beings have to fight for these rights.
	Yes, they may be inalienable, just like everyone is a beautiful soul, but ultimately how you express yourself on this...
	You may be a beautiful soul. People say, oh, he's such a beautiful soul.
	Yeah, but he's a criminal. He goes and kills people, right?
	So in the same way, when organizations get together, yes, we have these inalienable rights.
	But do we, as a human organization, exhibit those rights, those inalienable rights?
	Well, that's where you get into this contradiction.
	This is why we call the fight, the struggle.
	We have to fight for them.
	We have to fight against these people inhibiting those.
	And this is central to understand.
	So if you look at how, quote-unquote, laws come into being three ways, or amendments, right?
	Mm-hmm. We have a two-thirds majority of Congress, or you have a constitutional convention called, or the fact that rulings take place at the Supreme Court level, precedential rulings, and they are used, like in the Chevron case, for 40 years.
	Because by the Constitution, those don't really exist.
	Yeah, and I have always had a problem with Marbury v.
	Madison, because it wasn't in the Constitution, but the Supreme Court gave themselves that power.
	Jefferson said, well, that's it, it's over, when he saw that, essentially.
	So it's kind of been very clever.
	The way they asserted these powers that are there.
	Right, but you have this fact that there's these multiple interconnected things going on, which at a certain point in time, what we call the law, right?
	But key among all these things, I think people keep forgetting, and the establishment wants us to forget this, they're forgetting this other piece, which is the people, the political process of people rising up bottoms up.
	Because the original article says only she, only he can be president, for example.
	Well, how did that happen?
	If it wasn't for women rising up, right?
	They went to the Democrats to ask for the right to vote, right?
	They laughed at them. Then the 19th Amendment was created, which applied the Equal Protection Clause to women.
	From the 14th Amendment. But none of that would have occurred if there was not a bottoms-up movement.
	And this is what we need to understand.
	And I understand, and I agree with that.
	You know, I think the movements are important, but I think it's also important for them to, you know, we have to have some kind of an established thing, just like you're talking about the 19th Amendment, or we had the 18th Amendment where they prohibited alcohol, then 21 where they brought it back.
	So those types of things are driven from the ground up.
	But I think that also they need to, you know, dot the I and cross the T legally.
	Right, but I don't... But David, that always comes later.
	Politicians never do what's...
	I mean, you look at...
	In Trump versus Anderson on March 4th, 2024, this is a very important ruling.
	The Colorado courts denied Trump access to the ballot in Colorado.
	And they said that he violated Section 3 of the Insurrection Act of the 14th Amendment.
	So by... Constitutional provisions, he had violated that, they ruled on that, and they threw him off the ballot in two court rulings.
	Then the Supreme Court stepped in, swooped in, and they said, whoa, whoa, whoa, you can't do this.
	Why? Because they said we're going to have a patchwork.
	That's what was put forward.
	A patchwork of states, each with their own laws on how you run for president.
	Very, very important ruling.
	And they said even if you have a constitutional provision that's being violated at the federal level by a federal candidate, the states have no right to deny ballot access.
	That was a 9-0 ruling.
	Because they didn't want the United States as an organism to fall apart, which is what was post-Civil War.
	Again, these are some very, very fundamental rulings are taking place, and I think everyone needs to really understand what's going on.
	So that ruling is important to my running for president.
	Because when I'm trying to get on the ballot, some people are confused.
	About what took place between naturalized and quote-unquote natural-born, which has never defined the 14th Amendment, the 19th Amendment, you know, Schneider versus Rusk, Bowling versus Sharp, that there have been other rulings, including Trump versus Anderson.
	So if it wasn't for Trump v.
	Anderson, which is the Supreme Court, Trump would be thrown off the ballot in Colorado.
	So you do have, long before constitutional amendments get passed, you have these Supreme Court rulings, which are very, very powerful.
	They sustain a body of law.
	So yes, maybe one day Congress will do something.
	But what that ruling said was only Congress has a right to decide who becomes president.
	It's quite amazing, this ruling.
	So when I'm getting on the ballot...
	It's the same thing.
	No state has a right to deny me ballot access by pointing to a constitutional provision.
	If I win the presidency, only Congress has a right to say, you know what, we now have to interpret natural born versus naturalized citizen, and then they have to deny me access to the presidency, you see?
	But this is quite powerful.
	It basically goes down to the central part of I've got a person here, Mad Mem, thank you, and says, Good morning, David and Dr.
	Shiva. You're both doing God's work.
	Go to ShivaForPresent.com.
	I don't think we mentioned that earlier.
	That's your website. Is there a different website for the training classes that you've got?
	Yeah, so...
	I'm going to go.
	The elites learned this training.
	This is how the few are able to control the many.
	And if you want to know more about how the few control the many, the website that I recommend people go to is shattertheswarm.com.
	Shattertheswarm.com.
	S-H-A-T-T-E-R. Now, our campaign is fueled by this people who've gone through this training, and everyone should get one of these bumper stickers, and people can go to shiva4president.com, S-H-I-V-A numeral 4, president.com, And everyone should go there, get one of these bumper stickers, because this gives you the ability to use your own car as a very powerful vehicle to reach 100,000 people a day.
	ShivaNumero4President.com.
	But, and every Thursdays, David, at 11am and 8pm, we have a open house.
	And people can go to VHShiva.com slash orientation, or come to our town hall, Shiva4President.com slash town hall.
	But those are some of the mechanics of people getting involved.
	Okay. And so there's links to those other websites at shiva4president.com.
	President.com. Okay, good.
	I've got another question here.
	This is from DG8. It says, Dr.
	Shiva, what's your thoughts on AIPAC bragging on their own website of the 400-plus politicians they own?
	America first? Well, it's not America first.
	And by the way, the biggest person who is a beneficiary of this, who's going to be even a bigger beneficiary, is Trump.
	Trump is the biggest Zionist, and you can see what I said.
	I don't want to use those words here on the show.
	He serves Israel.
	Biden serves Israel.
	Booby Kennedy serves Israel.
	All of them do. To me, I'm the only anti-Zionist candidate.
	I've been talking about this for 40 years.
	Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism.
	It was Trump in 2016 who passed an executive order which said that we must equate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
	Now, after October 7th, everyone knows that was an engineered attack on, quote-unquote, Israel by Hamas, which is funded by Israel.
	I mean, it's obvious. It's right in front of your face, right?
	After that attack took place, I started re-educating people on the difference between Zionism and Judaism.
	One of those videos, in spite of all the shadow banning, got, I think, like 50 to 70 million views, David, globally.
	Okay? It was where I said I'm the only presidential candidate who doesn't bleep, you know, Zionist bleep.
	Okay? And people can go find that.
	But that video went viral.
	And the difference here is that on...
	So then on December 7th, Mike Johnson, a quote-unquote Christian, you know, Zionist, passed a bill in Congress equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
	And then about four weeks ago, the entire Congress passed a bill, 310, the House, to 70, saying that going into the future, they will be using...
	Bye.
	The definition of anti-Semitism pursuant to the Israel Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which is a complete Zionist nutjob organization.
	Yeah, they outsourced it, didn't even define it themselves.
	Yeah, well, if you go read it, the 7 of the 11 examples they give of what is anti-Semitism is if you say anything against the state of Israel, including if you say Israel is worse than their state.
	That's anti-Semitism. Yeah.
	Okay, which is a political ideology. So Trump is one of the biggest Zionist blah, you know, bleep bleepers, okay, you can fill that blank in Biden is so and booby Kennedy, booby Kennedy said the Palestinian people are the most pampered people on the planet. And then he compared the people in Gaza to Nazis, that we must go in there and wipe them out. And look at how great Germany became after we wiped out the Nazis. So if we
	wipe these people out, so why is this because all of these people are part of the swarm. All of them, they serve Israel, they do not serve the American working people. And if we want to those people, even the free Palestine movement has been infiltrated by quote unquote, liberal Zionists who keep talking about, you know, cease fire now they've been saying that for 40 years. cease fire now basically means Israel gets to move two steps forward, one step back. It doesn't mean and the
	occupation very different slogan, David, we must end the occupation of America.
	And this viewer is rightfully saying that.
	That AIPAC is gloating that they control Congress.
	And Congress is a representative body of the American people.
	Which means between us and Congress now is AIPAC. Which means Zionism.
	And central to the founders was that Congress ultimately is a representative body of we the people.
	So the house 90% 95% of those people are controlled by APAC Cynthia McKinney who was a congresswoman who just endorsed me she was thrown out Years ago years ago for bringing this out mm-hmm exposing the involvement of Zionism in Congress well, I think it's it's pretty clear. You know we it was also DeSantis jumped into that you know to get money and
	equating criticism of a political state Israel with anti-semitism and then making it a criminal offense the type of stuff that we're starting to see in this law.
	That everybody's being concerned about in Germany, but also in Ireland.
	You know, they're doing that as well. We're going to make hate speech an imprisonable offense and lock people up in prison.
	Well, they started doing that. The Republican Party did that in Florida with that.
	And so I think that's two very important things.
	I don't support any kind of hate speech regulation.
	I think you can't have freedom of speech if there's going to be such a thing as free speech, I think.
	But David, it just happened, when was it, a couple of months ago, when they passed that bill in Congress.
	It was, again, if you notice, all of this is being done by the Republican right.
	That's right. That's right.
	The Republican right, everyone listening, you MAGA-tards are the ones who are supporting this.
	Yep. Wearing Make America Great Again and literally supporting Israel.
	So we have now a law that's going to go to Congress, which is going to give the Department of Education infinite rights to take away money from schools that, let's say, support.
	Let's say MIT tomorrow wanted to invite me to speak on anti-Zionism.
	They would say, you can't invite that speaker, he's anti-Semitic.
	Equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism will remove your federal funds.
	Or let's say a high school wanted to invite me to come speak, David.
	And this is being done by the so-called Republican right.
	Not by the woke Democrats, but the Republican right is supporting massive fascism, pro-Israel, anti-American interests.
	And the spirit of it, this is Donald Trump.
	That's why when I looked at that debate, David, I don't know if you want to go there.
	Yeah, we're getting close to the end of the show, but we've got a few minutes and we can go over a little bit.
	Give us your take on the show.
	Now, you, just like some other people, many people...
	Live-streamed the debate, even though it was from CNN, they did it on Twitter.
	Musk said, go ahead and sue me.
	This is important.
	So you had commentators who were doing it and commenting live.
	You did it as a candidate and responding to the questions.
	Tell us a little bit about that. Of course, people can see that on Twitter as well, right?
	I bet you if we had streamed CNN, we would have been sued, but not Boobie Kennedy.
	After I decide to do it, then Boobie steals everything we do.
	Boobie Kennedy is an agent of the swarm.
	That's who he is. He's fake independent.
	He's a Zionist. Puppet.
	Okay? Completely. But anyway, if you looked at that debate, separate from the fact...
	So what I saw interesting was, we know Biden is on a set of cocktails, right?
	That keep his brain from going mush.
	And we know here Trump is just a liar.
	He'll say anything he needs to say to get as much money as he can.
	And we've had this discussion with other people, like Alex Jones does the same thing, right?
	Even though he knows things are wrong, he'll do it to raise money.
	Okay? So Trump is a master grifter.
	So here's a lying master grifter who has sex with prostitutes, you know, while his wife is pregnant.
	And over here you have a guy, Biden, whose brain has essentially become mush.
	Now what I found fascinating is, again, if you go to central principles, anything you see on mainstream media is something they want you to see.
	Yeah, that's right. Okay?
	So they wanted people to see a decrepit Biden.
	Now, how do they do that?
	Did they change his medical cocktail mix before that debate?
	Because he looked horrible. And the next day, they gave him the right cocktails where he looks really strong.
	I mean, it's amazing, right?
	You've got the puppy uppers, yeah.
	Right, so I would argue that someone...
	Remember, the swarm has its own internal conflicts.
	Someone has decided they maybe don't want Biden.
	They want somebody else because they're going to serve Zionism even better.
	So I found it quite profound that we knew how bad they made Biden look.
	And the next day is going.
	So I just want everyone to alert people that everything that you see on media is theater.
	It is brought to you by the swarm to serve the swarm.
	And, you know, looking at the fact that they, the timing that they did, we've always had the debates after the convention.
	Neither of these guys has been nominated as the official person, right?
	But they're debating each other. And it's all, usually the conventions are in late August.
	You don't have the first debate until the end of September.
	And then you have September, mid-October, latter part of October.
	I mentioned this many times to the audience.
	This time, they just leapfrogged all that stuff.
	And I think it was for the purpose of sabotaging him and getting somebody else in there.
	Do you have any predictions as to who you think it'll be?
	I've said this from day one.
	I've always said that they wanted Gavin Newsom.
	I think that's where they want someone in there.
	Maybe they'll throw a brown face like Kamala Harris in there, who's a Brahmin, who's also a Zionist.
	But I think that's their game.
	But it was obvious to everyone watching they want Biden out, within the swarm.
	They have their own internal conflicts.
	And you can see all of Silicon Valley supporting Trump.
	In fact, CNN is supporting Trump, right?
	Everybody's like, how did this happen?
	We never knew that he had any cognitive issues.
	Yeah, exactly. And the next day, everyone should go watch his rally.
	The next day, Biden's all fired up, da-da-da-da-da-da, because he got the right cocktails.
	So whoever engineered this, they make sure he got the wrong cocktails before the debate.
	And to your point, David, the timing of these debates, why would you do this debate when general election debates are not even supposed to take place after the convention?
	So everything people see, elections are selections.
	And it's all theater.
	Well, we're right at the end of the program, but let me get you.
	You talk a lot about the swarm.
	That's your term. Define that a little bit for people.
	How do you see the swarm? Is that the globalists?
	Is it the bureaucracy, the deep state?
	How do you see the swarm? Yeah, so David, I have a much more precise and tangible and accessible definition.
	So it takes away a lot of the quote-unquote, you know, what the left or other people call conspiracy, right?
	Mm-hmm. Okay.
	shatter swarm.com, you will understand it. So I really encourage everyone if you want to start your first level of learning how to fight, start with knowing who the enemy is, who's a swarm. They're not a particular geographical location, Israel, or the Pentagon, or some location, North Korea.
	First of all, it's not spatially based, nor is it not temporally based something over time, you know, at this location, the swarm exists, and now it doesn't. Okay. And it's not consolidated in a particular set of people, like the, quote unquote, the Rothschild, or not, or the quote unquote, the Jews are the quote unquote, Wall Street, it is a highly interconnected, telepathic, interconnected group of people who may have their own
	contradictions from time to time, because they it's WWE wrestling, right, right, blah, blah, blah. But overall, they move together as a blob. If you watch, you know, those star, I I think these birds that move over the ocean.
	Yeah, yeah. One group may move this way, but they ultimately move together.
	That is what the swarm is.
	It's a much more precise understanding.
	And you can learn how the few control the 8 billion of us.
	And so I've taken complex control systems, made it very accessible.
	So everyone should go to shattertheswarm.com.
	Step one, if you want to save yourself, understand who the enemy is.
	Step two, David, is everyone needs to understand this graph here.
	If you can see it, lifespan in the United States is going down, cost of living is going up.
	These people are literally killing you.
	And everyone should go to shatter the swarm, but I am here to provide people tools on how to fight.
	But you must want to take responsibility for yourself.
	You have to want to save yourself.
	If you don't want to save yourself, that's why we're in this condition.
	If you look at this graph, this has been going on since 1970, David.
	We keep thinking, oh, Bernie's going to do it.
	Oh, Trump's going to do it.
	Oh, Booby may do it now.
	Oh, Biden may do it.
	We've got to get off our butts and be real Americans.
	We have to want to fight for ourselves.
	That is the only way out of it.
	Now, my run for president gives people the opportunity to have someone like me lead people to the extent my leading is, hey, here's the water.
	This is where you go. You want to be a good horse and drink the water.
	That's what I've created. That water, that mana, which is truth, freedom, health.
	But if you don't want to do that, Well, please, I will give you a recommendation letter to go vote for Biden or Booby because you're going to be slowly cooked like the frog.
	So that's what our movement's about, David.
	It's really about personal responsibility.
	And that's what I like.
	That's what I like about it. It's, you know, I think we put way too much information, too much hope on the presidency.
	And your message that we've got to do it ourselves, we've got to do it from the bottom up, that is exactly what needs to happen.
	And I agree with you about the swarm.
	It isn't a particular place.
	Global governance is distributed, and it's a good analogy that you've got with the flocks of birds that are out there.
	Thank you so much for joining us again.
	People can go to shattertheswarm.com, or you can go to shiva4president.com.
	Thank you very much, Dr. Shiva.
	Appreciate it. Thanks, David.
	Be well. Best to you and your son and your family.
	Thank you. Thanks for having me on the show.
	Be well. Thanks, David.
	you too. Bye-bye.
	The common man.
	Bye.
	you They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

▲