Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 9, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:24

The David Knight Show - 05/09/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 9th of May, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin by going back and looking at how we got here.
	There's been some interesting connections to some of our tech oligarchs and to the foundation of the internet and these families.
	People talk about the bloodlines of the Illuminati.
	How about the bloodlines of the technocracy?
	We're going to take a look at that today to begin with.
	And we're going to take a deeper look at this amazing power grab going on in Canada.
	Put forward by Justin Castro.
	Yeah, the spawn of Fidel.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	We have retroactivity there.
	We have pre-crime.
	We have life sentences for speech.
	Folks, we're losing Western civilization very rapidly.
	We'll be right back. I guess we could call this the bloodlines of the technocracy.
	FBI file on Jeff Bezos' grandfather showing that he was a DARPA co-founder that's now evidently been destroyed.
	It no longer exists.
	There are newspaper clippings that talk about it, but of course, if you file a Freedom of Information request as the individual who runs the Black Vault run by John Greenwald, Jr., He runs that, and so he looks into the history of this dark government that we have here.
	Folks, the pageant that you see out there, the trials and tribulations of Trump, I mean, literally, as well as, you know, the CIA moves to take him out and everything.
	That's all just for show.
	There's real competition in this Game of Thrones, and there's real competition within the intelligence community.
	But the elections at the federal level don't make a dime's worth of difference.
	And we'll talk about that as well today when we take a look at the efforts to get rid of Machiavelli and Mike.
	It's interesting to see how all of the conservative press, Breitbart, WND, all of them, how they come after Machiavelli and Mike and say, hey, this guy, the Democrats love him.
	Nancy Pelosi supported him, endorsed him for this.
	You know, keep him in there. Keep him in there.
	He works with him multiple times.
	And with a minority of Republicans and all of the Democrats, he gets these things through.
	And so people are rightfully upset with him.
	And talk about the Uni Party.
	You know what they don't talk about?
	The fact that Trump supported him.
	He wouldn't have lasted a minute.
	If Trump had opposed him.
	Because we have a party that's been reduced to a cult of personality.
	And it is a sham.
	It is shadowboxing, what has happened in Washington.
	But let's focus on the bloodlines of technocracy here.
	What's not widely known is that Amazon founder Jeff Bezos' grandfather, Lawrence Preston Guise, helped form the Pentagon's super-secret advanced research projects agency, ARPA, that's renamed DARPA, later on.
	And that goes back to 1958.
	There's an interesting book by Annie Jacobson about DARPA. She really starts to focus not so much on the...
	She focuses on it after this similar time.
	She starts to focus on the Jason scientists who the Defense Department came to during Vietnam.
	And so they wanted to use Vietnam as a test bed for their wars and their equipment.
	And that's one of the reasons why we have a major reason why we have these unending wars when we are not attacked.
	They are test beds for their equipment.
	And so years later, of course, he describes it this way, DARPA developed the internet, internet search, voice recognition, high-speed networking, that type of thing.
	Interesting that they leave out social media.
	That is the most important thing.
	Because if you look at the beginning of the internet, as I've said many times, anybody that listens to this program knows how often I talk about J.C.R. Licklider and DARPA, and he was there at this time.
	As a matter of fact, he overlapped with the time that Bezos' grandfather was there.
	J.C.R. Licklider was a psychologist, and he proposed what he called the Intergalactic Computer Network.
	And it was the internet.
	Now, they didn't have the technology at the time to do it.
	They didn't have the hardware to do it.
	But he designed it.
	It was designed by a psychologist at DARPA. It was designed as a psychological weapon, as a weapon of psych warfare.
	And as soon as the equipment started to catch up in the 90s, You had all these organizations jump in big time into these venture capital firms.
	It's a matter of record. You can go look at how many of the intelligence community executives were on the boards of these venture capital firms, and the CIA even went public with their own, In-Q-Tel.
	They do talk about In-Q-Tel in here.
	But it was social media more than anything.
	Social media and the Internet.
	That was the key part of it.
	Those are the two components that had to be there for psychological warfare and control.
	And, of course, they throw it out there for free because they're funding it, because you're the product, because it was always about geospatial intelligence, all these things that they don't want.
	And they also don't mention geospatial intelligence in here either.
	One year before his grandfather died, Bezos' grandfather died in 1995, Bezos founded Amazon in the garage of his Bellevue, Washington home, and they say on Zero Hedge, or so we're told.
	And they show the picture of a young Jeff Bezos.
	Setting at a very simple desk.
	Pull that up, Travis. And on the wall is something that looks almost handwritten.
	Amazon.com.
	Yeah, that's the legend that's there.
	Now, I've talked many times about how Bezos is so obsessed with space.
	And he talks about the fact that he read Gerard K. O'Neill's book, High Frontiers.
	And how that was, you know, the idea that he wanted to put these rotating colonies in space.
	You saw it if you saw Elysium.
	You saw Gerard K. O'Neill's ideas of rotating toroids.
	There it is. There's a picture of Bezos sitting in his, the legend.
	There we go. In his garage with the Amazon sign there.
	Uh, but anyway, um, he was also extremely wealthy.
	He had all these connections with us, but hey, that was all just a coincidence.
	And he also wanted to, um, he also wanted to set up these space stations.
	And so that's why he's got his, uh, What was it called?
	Blue Origin. Yeah, Blue Origin is the name of his company there.
	But that's what his grandfather was into as well.
	Space technology, ballistic missile defense, 1958 to 1961.
	Again, it was about early 60s.
	I think it was publicly released by J.C.R. Licklider, I believe, in 62.
	But he was working on it while his father was there.
	Grandfather was there. And so again, the information has been scrubbed, but there are snapshots of these documents, as well as a snapshot of the FOIA request, where they said, I can't find it or it's been destroyed.
	And so, as many people point out, well, we know that Facebook is also based on a canceled DOD program, you know, the canceled LifeLog program.
	Part of the total awareness, well, we're going to keep a log of everybody's entire life, everything they got there.
	Well, it's even better, after people reacted to it, they said that they shut that down, the very next day you have Facebook.
	But of course, Facebook, the advantage of that is that they don't have to hire an army of people to do data entry.
	You enter your own information in there for them, so they can see all that stuff.
	One person commented on this.
	There's long time been speculation that DARPA has been involved in the creation of many popular big tech companies using front men for the illusion of a startup led by outsiders.
	Well, first of all, that's not speculation.
	It's fact. As I've said over and over again.
	And, yeah, it is an illusion.
	And it is bigger than just the internet.
	It's social media. It's geospatial intelligence, especially.
	And so, another person said, we know Facebook is a canceled program of the DoD.
	If you look at the Bill Gates family, you find similar stuff, and you find connections to Planned Parenthood as well with the Gates family.
	He's always been about killing people.
	Now, we got these three factors up here.
	We got to get one of them down to zero, right?
	Let's get the people down to zero.
	Always been about that.
	Bill Gates is as much of a humanity hater as Paul Ehrlich.
	Can we do it with disease?
	Can we do it with war? Can we do it with vaccines?
	Always about that stuff.
	And so, there's also an article that I saw yesterday about Gina Haspel.
	And Greg Rubini did this on his Substack.
	Now, it's interesting to me that everything that he talks about with Gina Haspel, who, again, you know, if you watch this program, I've talked about her frequently.
	But everything that he does, that he talks about, is to defend Trump.
	And yet he scratches his head.
	He goes, does Trump not know this?
	That's a rhetorical question, isn't it?
	I mean, the question is, is Trump a fool or a tool?
	Everything you want to know about Gina Haspel.
	He begins by talking about James O'Keefe's sting, ambushing a CIA officer, Amjad Versaillesi, if I pronounced his name correctly.
	He titled it, CIA Project Manager Says Execs and Directors of CIA Withheld Information from Trump.
	See? We don't care.
	We don't care if there's a secret government.
	We don't care if there's a secret government that starts wars that gets us involved, gets our soldiers killed.
	We don't care about that.
	We don't care if they do a coup of our own government.
	We don't care if they assassinate our own people.
	We don't care if they're blackmailing politicians.
	We don't care if they're involved in the demonic occult stuff that we know they're involved in.
	We don't care about any of that stuff.
	What they do to Trump.
	That's what I want to know. That's all I care about is Trump.
	This cult of personality.
	Drives me nuts.
	As a matter of fact, it just took down FreedomWorks.
	They admitted it. They said, well, you know, it was Dick Armey, who was a, he was the majority leader.
	Excuse me. The number two position when English was speaker.
	He had Dick Armey.
	Was a leader. And he was a, sorry, coughing here.
	He was an economics professor of the Austrian school, Ludwig von Mises, and a solid guy.
	Anyway, that was the basis of FreedomWorks.
	And then Trump came.
	And we don't care about principles anymore.
	We don't care about economic principles.
	We don't care about principles of liberty or any of that stuff.
	All we care about. As Donald Trump.
	So how did Gina Haspel affect Donald Trump?
	Why did he put her in the position that he did?
	As I've said many times.
	So Greg Rubini says, we learned some interesting stuff from this O'Keefe expose.
	Especially regarding Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo, he says.
	Well, I don't know.
	Because I think he admitted from this thing some of the most interesting stuff that we always knew about Gina Haspel.
	How she illegally tortured people.
	How she covered that up.
	How she used the lies to lie us, the lies from torture, used that to lie us into the Iraq War.
	Or the knowing politicians used what she presented themselves.
	I didn't know she was lying to me.
	They used that to give themselves plausible deniability to get us involved in the Iraq War.
	Now, Donald Trump says...
	We got into the Iraq war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction.
	He said that as a candidate. And yet, as president, he takes the woman who did that.
	And first, he put her into the number two slot, right underneath Pompeo.
	Then he moved Pompeo to Secretary of State.
	And he moved Gina Haspel to CIA Director, from Deputy Director to Full Director.
	And so, this guy's looking at it and says, what do these people do?
	They were involved in all this skullduggery and framing of Trump.
	Gina Haspel withheld information from Trump.
	Really? Wow. You think?
	It's on a need-to-know basis, and he doesn't need to know everything.
	He's just the president. She's running the government if she's in the CIA, right?
	James O'Keefe adds that Gina Haspel blocked the release of a binder that was exposing herself and the CIA and the fabricated Russian collusion hoax.
	You see, the Russian collusion hoax and her role in that is more important to these Trump suckers than it is to the fact that she lied us into the Iraq War and then covered up the torture and the rest of the stuff.
	Where was Gina Haspel in 2016 when all the spy operations on Trump took place?
	Well, she was in London.
	And she was the CIA station chief in London.
	And we know that it was the London Langley axis, as I've said many times.
	She was the London side of the Langley axis.
	And on the Langley side was John Brennan.
	He was CIA director in 2016.
	And he says, this is really important, he connects these dots.
	This means that Gina Haspel was reporting directly to John Brennan, who directed all the spy operations against Trump.
	All we care about is Trump.
	These people can start World War III, a nuclear war.
	They can have a revolution here in America.
	They can destroy our country, assassinate our presidents, blackmail every one of these politicians.
	But what do they do to Trump?
	These people...
	These people. It's just amazing.
	The countries which helped John Brennan, Obama, and Hillary Clinton in the spy operations on Trump are England, Austria, Italy.
	Gina Haspel was a liaison to John Brennan and Obama for all of these spy operations.
	So why then would Trump hire Gina Haspel as CIA director?
	He didn't know?
	Three question marks.
	He didn't know that the British were spying on him?
	He didn't know that Gina Haspel was CIA station chief in London in 2016?
	Did he not watch my show?
	Because I talked about it all that time.
	This is public knowledge.
	He knew. He knew.
	Do you know who endorsed Gina Haspel when Trump nominated her as CIA director?
	John Brennan and James Clapper.
	We all know we're after Trump, right?
	Yes, the Obama guys, Brennan and Clapper endorsed Gina Haspel.
	And some more deep state actors endorsed Gina Haspel too.
	So again, the question is, and he doesn't really get close.
	Trump didn't know?
	That's as close as he comes.
	No, the question is this.
	We know that Trump knew.
	The question is, was he blackmailed?
	What did they have on him?
	Was it Epstein? Other things that he did, he knew.
	He absolutely knew.
	And so, was Gina Haspel involved in the planning of the January the 6th operation?
	Was she involved in the lockdown?
	Was she involved in Dark Winter 2?
	When they finally activated what they'd been practicing since two months before 9-11?
	The other shoe to drop from 9-11?
	See, all this stuff was an inside job.
	January the 6th was an inside job.
	It was an inside job, not just from Gina Haspel.
	It was an inside job from Donald Trump making $250 million on his Save America.
	It was an inside job from Alex Jones, another CIA guy.
	Again, how many people...
	Just ask yourself...
	You probably know a lot of people who have been injured with a vaccine, but do you know anybody who is in the CIA? Do you know anybody who has several family members in the CIA? How many people that you know are involved in the CIA who have multiple family members in the CIA? Who talks about the fact that he has multiple family members in the CIA? Alex does.
	Who uses CIA sources or intelligence community sources like Pachenik and others.
	And uses it, and Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Schaefer and others like that at that time to lie to people about the sting and to set this up.
	And to make unbelievable amounts of money as well.
	And then, still using the Sandy Hook stuff.
	$1.4 billion, billion dollar judgment, and he hasn't paid a penny.
	How many people do you know like that?
	That don't have to pay when they get a massive judgment against them.
	How many people do you know that are protected by the deep state and the intelligence community?
	Well, I know one, personally.
	Anyway, when you look at all this, was she involved in the planning of January 6th?
	Now, ask yourself if Trump and Alex and Pchenik and Roger Stone and Jack Posobiec and all these other, you know, intelligence, military intelligence, typically, these guys.
	It's not monolithic.
	But they do work together.
	You know, we're supposed to believe that Gina Haspel is on one side and John Brenner and Clapper were on the other side.
	Trump supported Gina Haspel.
	Did she support Trump? Did she betray Trump?
	Did she direct Trump and tell him what to do?
	That's really the question.
	Strange that this author doesn't mention anything about Iraq or torture or any of that stuff.
	Strange that he won't offer an opinion as to whether or not he thinks Trump is a fool or a tool.
	So, that's where we are.
	People won't go there.
	And for obvious reasons, isn't it?
	When Trump hired Mike Pompeo as CIA director in January of 2017, he appointed Gina Haspel as CIA deputy director.
	This means that Gina Haspel was the true boss of the CIA for the entire four years of the Trump presidency.
	Because he later then moved her up to that.
	He sees Pompeo as just a place-holding idiot.
	But he doesn't see Trump as a place-holding idiot.
	Isn't that interesting?
	Yeah. People like this, all they see is Trump, Trump, Trump.
	And they can't see or they won't talk about the bigger picture.
	The bigger picture of Iraq, the bigger picture of 9-11, the bigger picture of the pandemic and global governance and moving the Overton window.
	On global Mark of the Beast ID. Moving the Overton window on universal basic income.
	Moving the Overton window on everybody not having a job and all the rest of this stuff.
	So, getting back to Jeff Bezos, you know, he moved to Florida.
	And he did a $60 million initial investment in lab meat.
	And now it's interesting that Ron DeSantis has just welcomed this new immigrant to Florida by shutting down his lab meat and stuff effectively.
	Say, you are not going to sell this stuff here.
	I didn't know if he...
	Blocked the manufacturing of any of that stuff in the Sunshine State, but you're not going to sell it there.
	He signed the legislation into effect on May 1st, casting it as a bid to stop the World Economic Forum's goal of forcing the world to eat lab-grown meat and insects.
	And I think it's good as far as it goes, but I think that he misses the key issue here.
	There's a lot of good stuff that DeSantis has done.
	A lot of stuff that nobody else has bothered to do.
	I mean, he tried to focus people on big brother digital money, but the press shut him down.
	All they wanted to do was talk about Trump and what's going on with Alvin Bragg and this trial that's happening, you know, the hush money to hookers.
	That's all they wanted to talk about.
	He does 20 minutes breaking down the problems of CBDC, and then all they want to do is talk about Trump and his hookers.
	And so with this, and then also with the vaccine, he's got his surgeon general talking about those DNA fragments, you know, the DNA fragments that are giving people cancer.
	And it's not even that it's just sloppy manufacturing and cutting corners on manufacturing.
	They've got the part of the SV40 virus that gives you cancer.
	They left that in. Left all that stuff in.
	And by the FDA's own definition, it's unfit to be sold.
	But they look the other way.
	Canada looks the other way.
	But at least Ron DeSantis and his attorney general said, we don't recommend it.
	They didn't ban it. That's what I'm saying.
	They speak out against it.
	They go a certain way, but they won't go all the way.
	It's kind of like what I talked about yesterday with Senator Ron Johnson and this pandemic treaty.
	He got all 49 Republican senators to say we don't support this, and they wrote a letter to Biden saying we don't support this.
	But in that letter, they asked Biden to please submit this as a treaty so we can have a vote on it.
	Well, it won't pass.
	They need to have 60 votes.
	They would only have 51 votes at most.
	Even if, you know, you might have more than that against it because some of the Democrats might push back against it.
	I don't know. But it is an election year.
	But they won't take the initiative to shut it down themselves.
	They don't need to ask Biden to submit it as a treaty.
	They can say, this is a treaty, and you don't get to self-rightify treaties, just like you should not have been given.
	But they took a pass on it with Mitch McConnell.
	They didn't do anything with the Paris Climate Accord, and so it looks like they're going to do that same type of thing again.
	Again, they will go only so far.
	In Florida, they will say, I recommend that you don't take this vaccine because of the contamination from DNA stuff.
	But they won't say it's banned.
	Why not? We had nine states ban a vaccine after a couple people died a few decades ago.
	States can do that kind of thing.
	States must do that kind of thing.
	But all they'll do is say, well, I don't recommend...
	I recommend that you don't take it, but they won't ban the sale of something that can harm people.
	Why not? They do that all the time with other stuff.
	And the Senate will not ban...
	The presumption of this pandemic treaty.
	They'll speak out. They'll write a letter about how bad it is, but they won't do anything.
	You see this all the time.
	Jim Jordan always holding a hearing about this.
	Holding a hearing about that.
	Never doing anything that he actually has the power to do.
	Do these people even know what their job description is?
	Have they ever read it? You know, what is the purpose of Congress?
	Well, it's to...
	The House allocates funding.
	And that's their major power.
	A really strong power, said Scalia, rightfully so, because everything that is done by the government is done with blackmail, just like this Anti-Semitism Awareness Act.
	Well, we're not going to give you money.
	We'll give you money if you do what we like.
	We won't give you money if you do what we don't want you to do.
	So everything is about the money, and Congress has those purse strings, but they won't use them.
	The Senate has the power to approve or disapprove treaties, but they won't pull a vote.
	The state governor has the ability and the duty, quite frankly, to stop this poison, but he won't do it.
	Well, I wouldn't take that if I were you.
	I don't recommend you take that.
	Anyway, so what are they doing with the meat?
	DeSantis says, Florida is increasing meat production and encouraging residents to continue to consume and enjoy 100% real Florida beef.
	He previously blasted, quote, the global elite's plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a Petri dish or bugs to achieve their authoritarian goal.
	And so, I think the way to do this that would be better...
	What is the goal?
	The goal, as we can see with this bird flu stuff, is to shut down local production.
	It is to gain control of beef and chicken and all that kind of stuff.
	It is to vaccinate all of our food.
	Those are their goals in all this bird flu nonsense.
	So what do we do to stop that?
	They want to track and vaccinate Every cow, every chicken, everywhere.
	Lots of money for big pharmaceutical companies.
	It pollutes the food supply, kills the population, makes us sick.
	That's their goal. Depopulation for us, power and money for them.
	Attack our food supply, starve us, make it expensive.
	And that's the other part of this.
	They want to...
	By culling herds, by culling chickens and things like that.
	We've got one PCR test here.
	Kill all the cows on this ranch.
	Kill all the chickens.
	And we've got one PCR test.
	Well, what's that going to do? That's going to raise the price of beef and chicken.
	And if they keep raising the price of beef and chicken, guess what?
	They can't lower, right now, the price of this lab meat.
	It's still extremely expensive, besides being disgusting.
	You want a, instead of a tube steak, you want a tumor steak?
	It's disgusting and quite frankly has a lot of questions about whether or not it's helpful and healthy.
	But when you look at the economics, you can either lower your costs or you can force the government, you can use the government to force other people's costs up.
	Or you can use the government eventually to ban the other people.
	That's what they want to do. They want to make beef and chicken more expensive, more expensive, more expensive, until a lot of people are not even getting it.
	And then they can ban it, and people say, yeah, I haven't been able to afford beef or chicken for a long time.
	It's just those rich people that do it.
	So let's get rid of it.
	So what should he do?
	Well, I think what you want to do is instead of even better than banning the lab meat, sure, fine, ban the sale of it.
	I'd like to see him ban the sale of these vaccines, but he doesn't do that.
	And I think it's important to do it at this point in time, because if they wait until they are selling this stuff, then it's going to be harder to do it.
	It's just like a nuclear warhead.
	You want to get it in the launch phase.
	So you want to get this in the launch phase.
	I'm glad that he's banning it.
	But I think it's even better to allow alternatives that they want to shut down.
	And the alternative that they want to shut down is local processing of beef by the people who own it.
	Shutting down this attempt, because this is another one of the goals of their bird flu stuff, and that is to centralize meat processing even more so.
	It's already highly centralized and under the thumb of the USDA. They want to make it even more so that way.
	And so what you do is you go the other way.
	Everything that we do needs to be focused on decentralization and local.
	And so what do you do for the food supply?
	Well, you want to make it decentralized and local.
	You want to allow people to have farms and to grow whatever they wish.
	Leave them alone. If they want to drink raw milk, leave them alone.
	If they want to grow cows and slaughter the cattle on their own farm, leave them alone.
	That would be the best thing that he could do.
	But I'm glad that he's calling attention to this.
	And so Bezos moved to Florida.
	The Bezos Earth Fund, chaired by his girlfriend, Sanchez, announced a hefty investment into sustainable protein, including plant-based fermented and cultivated meats, part of the organization's larger $1 billion commitment to expanding food production.
	Isn't it interesting how these megalomaniacal billionaires all want to kill us?
	We need to feed 10 billion people with healthy, sustainable food throughout this century while protecting our planet.
	We can do it, and it will require a ton of innovation.
	Actually, require a ton of cash.
	Sanchez wrote in a statement.
	She didn't even give the speech.
	She had somebody else write it and put her name on it.
	So, yeah, even Bill Gates has said, is it going to take a lot of innovation?
	No. Even Bill Gates has said, Cattle are the most efficient way.
	Yeah, but we just can't have that because of their farts.
	So we're going to have to genetically modify them so they don't fart.
	Coal is the most efficient way, but we can't have that either because, you know, we got to pretend that we can't clean it up.
	They know, we know, and we know that they know that we know.
	But they always come up with, oh, methane, CO2. Lab-grown meat differs from its slaughter-free counterparts, like Impossible Foods, and that lab meat is grown from real animal cells replicated scientifically.
	You notice how the New York Post slips that in there?
	Slaughter-free.
	Slaughter-free. Cruelty-free.
	You know, cosmetics. This is slaughter-free.
	I prefer my meat slaughtered.
	I don't want it moving around when I'm trying to eat it.
	So, yeah, slaughter-free counterparts.
	We need to not be intimidated by their, you know, what they say with this stuff.
	But let's understand what they're talking about here is eternal cell lines.
	You know, kind of like tumors.
	And we need to talk about this.
	Would you prefer to have ground beef or ground tumors?
	Let's play their game back at them.
	Slaughter-free. I like my meat to be tumor-free.
	I don't like to eat tumors.
	What we are protecting here, says DeSantis, is the industry against acts of man, against an ideological agenda that wants to finger agriculture as the problem, that views things like raising cattle as destroying our climate.
	All this fear about man-made climate change.
	We should be afraid of man-made austerity and depopulation.
	Because that's what they're really about.
	We should be afraid of man-made slavery.
	These will be people who will lecture the rest of us about things like global warming.
	They'll say that, you know, you can't drive an internal combustion engine vehicle.
	They'll say that agriculture is bad.
	Meanwhile, they're flying to Davos in their private jets.
	So he says all this stuff.
	We all know this.
	So this is really a vision of imposing restrictions on freedoms of everyday people.
	While these elites are effectively pulling the strings, calling the shots, doing whatever the hell they want to do in their own lives.
	And we've said in Florida, these folks like the World Economic Forum in Davos, that they meet, they scheme.
	Those policies are dead on arrival in the state of Florida.
	They want to basically eliminate meat.
	They want to eliminate cattle. They want to eliminate chickens, all this stuff.
	They want to create protein in laboratories.
	So it's essentially lab-created meat.
	And their goal is to get to a point where you will not be raising cattle.
	You'll not be developing meat like we're doing for hundreds and hundreds of years in the state of Florida.
	The elites know that if it was put out there to compete with normal beef, they would lose.
	And that's why they're trying to, you know, increase the cost by claiming that there's bird flu out there now.
	You see, they've got multiple MacGuffins they can use.
	They can use the pandemic, not just the climate MacGuffin, to destroy our meat and dairy.
	You know, they're already associated meat and dairy with the climate MacGuffin.
	But hey, if they take meat and dairy away because it's the pandemic MacGuffin, oh well, it's not a plot at all, is it?
	He says, I think part of being a good steward of these industries, of the state of the public well-being...
	It's to think forward and to head off the threats before they even come.
	Again, what he needs to do is focus on local.
	He needs to focus on freedom.
	He needs to shut down and interpose against these captive agencies.
	The USDA is captive to these interests of this stuff, just like the FDA and CDC are captive to the Pharmaceutical industry.
	He says some people think that Florida is a theme park, South Beach, and maybe some oranges, but they don't really understand that, you know, we have one of the top cattle industries in the country.
	As a matter of fact, my dad's cousins had a big cattle ranch in Central Florida before Disney.
	I don't know what happened after Disney went in and maybe they sold it.
	I lost contact with them, but when I was a kid, I remember going out there to the cattle ranch.
	But, you know, Disney is there now.
	But they still have a lot of cattle.
	That's down there. Florida bill is similar to other legislation making its way through state legislatures in Arizona, Tennessee, and West Virginia.
	All of it concerns an industry that at least to this point is commercially non-existent, with the exception of sales at a couple of high-end restaurants, because it's so incredibly expensive, so they've got to make our meat and dairy more expensive.
	A CEO of a company that produces lab-grown seafood So I've got more than enough challenges.
	I don't also need Florida to ban it to make the market smaller.
	And so I'm glad that DeSantis did it, especially because there's plenty of seafood in Florida without having to go through the lab.
	Meanwhile, going back to Zuckerberg and his fascist book, it comes out, and of course this is all in the context of trying to rig the election against Trump because that's all we care about, right?
	DARPA Zuckerberg considered buying the Associated Press.
	Why should that be surprising?
	Because everything that AP, Associated Press, is about and everything that Facebook is about is about peddling propaganda.
	So they would be a natural match for each other, frankly.
	We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and cover some other news on Rockfan.
	Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. He says, finally got to see the movie Brazil.
	Great movie. Yeah, and I got to thank Gard again.
	He found a book about it and sent it to me.
	He said, thank you very much, Gard.
	I haven't had time to read it yet, unfortunately.
	On Rockfin, Michelle Obama, thank you also.
	He says, Brazil was okay.
	Yeah, it had, you know, I mean, it's like everything else that Monty Python does.
	It has brilliant moments, and then it has, okay, this is kind of plotting here, but...
	Every time I go back and see it, unfortunately, it looks more and more like reality today, doesn't it, Travis?
	My kids don't like it.
	I remember watching it when we were fairly young and just being incredibly depressed when the movie ended.
	Same thing with Dark Star.
	It cured me of any interest in space travel or any of this stuff.
	No, I don't care about NASA. I watch Dark Star.
	But, you gotta admit, you know, this talking bomb, their smart bomb, he was way ahead of his time with Darkstar.
	Yeah, they got that one right.
	Yeah, and you gotta look at Brazil.
	All the stuff, the SWAT raids and all the rest, I mean, predated all that stuff, unfortunately.
	Very predictive, just like Orwell and H.G. Wells.
	Oh, man. When we look at whether we live in 1984 or whether we live in a brave new world, Huxley's stuff.
	Huxley's brother, the transhumanism.
	I mean, it's all there. On Rockfin, EcoTaxi.
	Thank you very much for the tip. I believe, he said, that everyone should listen to and preferably simultaneously watch some superset of this about 22 and a half minute AV in which Dinesh D'Souza schools Michael Shermer about what a supreme force for good, including but not obviously far from limited to scientific technological good, That Christianity generally has always been worldwide.
	And so, well, I haven't seen that.
	Travis says he's provided a link to the video.
	On Rockfin, Michelle Obama, thank you very much again for another tip, and writes, correction, Al Gore invented the internet.
	That's right. Yeah. Yeah, not JCR Licklider or DARPA. It was Al Gore who did it.
	You're absolutely right.
	He took credit for it anyway, whether or not he invented it.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	So, let's get started. All right.
	Oh, Oh Oh So
	You're listening to the david knight show you
	All right.
	Boy Scouts of America.
	No longer boys.
	Not men either. Look at this.
	I mean, how could we have had for more than 100 years some organization that had the toxic masculinity to talk about boys?
	Because, you know, boys are so toxic and masculine.
	And this was the thing that was holding them back as an organization.
	So let's jettison. All this male masculinity and toxicity and all the rest of the stuff.
	And I think it's very interesting.
	I've seen everyone of the conservative press rightfully complaining about this.
	But again, I've not seen anybody talk about the Trump connection with all this stuff.
	Rex Tillerson. Rex Tillerson, you know, besides being head of Exxon, Rex Tillerson was head of the Boy Scouts there for a while, and he ushered in a lot of this LGBT stuff while he was there.
	You know, they were letting openly homosexual scoutmasters go camp with the boys in the woods.
	They were letting openly homosexual boys join.
	Various other things like that for quite some time.
	And he was involved in that. I remember when the transition was happening for Trump, it was after the election.
	It was in December 2016.
	I took some time off after the election.
	I took it in December as people were starting to take vacation breaks.
	And Alex was talking about how he would text and talk to Trump all the time.
	And so I saw the rumors, which turned out to be true, that Rex Tillerson was going to be tapped for Secretary of State.
	And so I started tweeting to Alex.
	And at that point in time, I had not been shadow banned on Twitter.
	So I had far less people than I've got now, but I would get far more impressions than I do now.
	And so I was tweeting at Alex and I was tweeting at Trump about Rex Tillerson.
	Do you realize this guy is a radical greenie?
	And then I got all these people saying, you're nuts.
	He was head of Exxon. It's like, you don't understand that Exxon is into the radical green agenda every bit as much as RFK Jr., for example?
	You know, you better wake up, folks.
	That's how they pull it off.
	But then I started talking about what he did with the Boy Scouts.
	Nobody pushed back on that, except for Alex.
	And he told me to stop it.
	Why are you texting this stuff at me?
	I was like, well, because I'm not there.
	And I thought you would want to know how naive I was at that time.
	Anyway, but it was a learning experience, just like what had happened just before the election.
	But, yeah, Rex Tillerson was always there.
	The Trump transition team turned out that was right.
	And, you know, at the time...
	I didn't know that Trump had been trying to sell trainees as part of his beauty contest.
	He was all about that.
	He was one of the earliest adopters, just like General Flynn.
	These guys have been on board with the trainee agenda from the very beginning.
	I saw that some conservative tweeted out and said, well, the clip that I played for you yesterday of RFK Jr., where the guy really pressured him about it.
	You're going to stop the mutilation of children if you're president?
	Well, I don't know. I can't make that decision.
	I really don't know what that's about.
	I really don't know.
	I don't know one way or the other. You know, I can't.
	It's like, seriously? I'll leave it up to the parents.
	I don't want to get the government involved.
	I think people need to be able to decide what they want to do.
	But you're saying that these are children?
	That these children are going to decide what they do with their own body?
	Seriously? You know, and I would have, I thought the guy did a great job of pressing him.
	The only thing I would have Changed if I had the time to think about it.
	I understand, you know, Monday morning quarterback this stuff.
	But I think the one thing that should have been said to RFK Jr.
	is, okay, so you say the parents can decide to mutilate the children.
	You know, I think in general we ought to defer to the institution of the family.
	We should not try to undermine it.
	We should support parental rights, but we should also understand there's some horribly wicked parents out there.
	We have parents who will abuse their kids sexually, physically, all different kinds of abuse.
	And this is a kind of sexual and physical abuse.
	We should recognize it as such.
	And so I would ask RFK Jr., so would you be okay if the parents wanted to get involved in incest with their minor children?
	Is that the parent's decision?
	Where do you draw the line and say this is not appropriate parental behavior?
	Right? And I'm not, again, CPS has been very abusive.
	However, you know, I don't think that we should be naive enough to think that there aren't parents out there that will abuse their kids for their own satisfaction.
	And a lot of this trans stuff is for their own satisfaction, for their own gratification, for their own social credit amongst their sick peers.
	Don't tell me you don't know what's going on, RFK Jr.
	And so I saw people put that up and say, well, you know, this should be the end of RFK Jr.
	Well, it wasn't the end of Michael Flynn to push that kind of stuff.
	It wasn't the end of Donald Trump to push that kind of stuff.
	And they're still, you know, Donald Trump is still pushing it at Mar-a-Lago.
	So, anyway, they have a new name.
	Not Boy Scouts of America, but Scouting.
	America, I think, is the new name.
	And I thought it was kind of, I remember when I was a kid, I never became a Boy Scout or anything.
	But it was a pretty big footprint, you know, back in the 50s and 60s.
	And their motto was, trustworthy, honest, and brave.
	Trustworthy, honest, and brave.
	Yeah, and it's kind of gone the way of duty, honor, and country, hasn't it?
	That was the America that I grew up in, where people aspired to be trustworthy, honest, and brave, where soldiers talked about duty, honor, and country.
	And now all that happens is people are, you know, should I wear, what kind of dress, says the man, should I wear with these red high heels, and what kind of makeup should I wear?
	We have become so debauched.
	It's disgusting.
	And we've lost... Any aspiration to these ideals?
	Oh yeah, that stuff's corny, isn't it?
	Is it? Is it corny?
	You're going to find out what kind of country we have when you remove these corny aspirations, like being trustworthy, honest, and brave, duty, honor, and country.
	You remove that stuff, you find out what kind of country you're going to live in.
	And you're going to wish that we went back to the corny stuff.
	So, again, you know, why even bother to segregate our Scouts by age?
	Why have Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts?
	You know, why segregate people by age when you're going out and camping in the woods?
	I mean, we're putting boys and girls together in the showers and in the dressing rooms and all the rest of the stuff, so why bother to do that?
	The New York Times noted that the club dropped the word boy in 2018 from its namesake program to allow girls to join.
	Moreover, in 2020, the organization announced a diversity and inclusion merit badge, and they made earning it a requirement for becoming an Eagle Scout.
	Isn't that amazing? In 2013, it ended its longstanding policy of barring openly gay youth from activity.
	This is probably all around the Tillerson regime here.
	The Boy Scouts became synonymous with Well, the infamous for habitual cases of grooming and pedophilia, lots of lawsuits, lots of cover-up.
	And I believe that also went back to the Tillerson regime.
	And so as Winepress comments on it, they said, you shouldn't have been sending your boy there anyway.
	As they continue to cover it up for years.
	Yeah, it's been an open secret about what's been happening with that for quite some time.
	But there now, you have to do the diversity, inclusion stuff and everything in order to get your merit badges and become an Eagle Scout.
	They are trans-friendly.
	They want to push people into looking at their authentic self.
	Meanwhile, the country that our politicians want to have a war with, China, Is training their young people militarily from elementary school on up while our boys are preening around in their red high heels wondering what kind of makeup they should apply.
	You know, how do we do a better job dressing in drag?
	These guys are militarized training for their kids.
	And especially when you consider the fact this huge imbalance of male to female that they created with their one-child policy.
	That in of itself would be something that would goad the Chinese into military action, even if we didn't have the murder-suicide pill called the CIA that we have to swallow here in the United States.
	The Chinese Communist regime has drafted a law that would require military training for children all the way down to elementary school level.
	They noted on Tuesday, Nikai Asia, that publication said some high schools in China and universities also already require students to participate in basic military drills, some of which involve tanks.
	That's where they have protesters standing in front of the tanks and they run them over, as in Tiananmen Square.
	Armored personnel carriers, hand grenades, rocket launchers.
	Also, China's conscription laws were amended in May of last year.
	To make all university students eligible for the draft.
	It would be interesting to see some of these protesters drafted.
	It would almost be worth bringing it back, wouldn't it?
	And so, before we take a break, restoring history.
	Movement to return Confederate-linked names to schools garners traction.
	And, of course, this is in the Shenandoah area, where you had Jackson and Lee.
	But during COVID, you had the local school board just decide to do it without any input from the public because, you know, Trump had locked everything down.
	This is our opportunity.
	And I think it may be our opportunity to take a look at what these people are doing.
	We don't have to live by their rules, and we don't have to live by what they have done.
	That does not need to become the new normal.
	It does not need to become a precedent.
	And this applies to so many different things.
	We need to take back our history.
	We need to take back our culture.
	And so Stonewall Jackson High School was renamed Mountain View High School.
	Ashby Lee Elementary School was renamed Honey Run Elementary School.
	And the Shenandoah County School Board passed this resolution in July of 2020.
	They said this is about racism.
	No, it's not. This is about Marxism.
	This is about erasing a country, erasing our history.
	And, you know, I'm not going to defend everything that was done by any historical figure.
	Nobody is perfect. Everybody had their bad edges, so you take the good and leave the bad.
	And, you know, speak out against the bad.
	That's fine. But we also, there's a reason that these people were honored.
	Quite frankly, Stonewall Jackson is one of the worst examples if you want to try to hold forth Southerners as racist.
	This is a guy who, when it was illegal to train to school blacks in how to read at the time, he did it anyway.
	And when the churches would not allow the black people to attend, he set up his own Sunday school and church for black people there.
	And so, is he perfect?
	Of course not. But he had monuments set up to him.
	Not about that even.
	But because he was a military genius.
	I had a friend from high school who went to West Point.
	He said, you know, they still are teaching us Snowball Jackson's Shenandoah Valley campaign.
	It was absolutely amazing.
	The guy was disciplined, focused, a genius.
	He had an iron will, and yet he was compassionate.
	But see, we have to not allow that.
	We've got to create animosity.
	We've got to have these simplistic characterizations of everybody.
	You can't have somebody who resisted the invasion from Lincoln have any edges of compassion to him.
	You've got to reinvent him into a one-dimensional figure.
	Yeah, real history is a lot more interesting and a lot more complex than their lives, isn't it?
	So anyway, this decision was made during the COVID pandemic.
	There was no public input into it.
	But they have put out a survey.
	And that had some very interesting results.
	They surveyed more than 8,500 residents in this district.
	And of those who responded, those 8,500, they had 91% of the people voted to go back to the names that were there.
	Now, you might say, well, this is 91% white.
	No, it is 85% white.
	And so, there were non-white people who wanted to go back to those names as well.
	And so, on the other side, They put out a census and they only had, or they put out a signature thing on change.org.
	They only got 680 signatures.
	So instead of 8,500 people, 680 people signed a signature that said the heart of the issue is what history do we remember and preserve?
	And I think that is exactly right.
	But they characterized it as a history of massive resistance to integration.
	That was not what the history was about.
	As a matter of fact, Stonewall Jackson said, this is our second war of independence.
	That's what he called the Civil War.
	They were not trying to take over and rule the northern states.
	They wanted their independence.
	They saw themselves as fighting a defensive war after aggressive invasion of By Lincoln.
	Lincoln, who had instituted for the first time a draft, an income tax, who had shut down habeas corpus, who had arrested politicians who disagreed with him.
	Our reasoning is sound.
	Military leaders of the Confederate States of America took up arms against the United States of America and fought to preserve and expand this peculiar institution of slavery.
	Well, I guess it depends on what history you remember.
	And what history you preserve.
	And so I think there's a different history that they don't want to acknowledge.
	The Council on American-Islamic Relations, CARE, is on the side of, surprise, surprise, the radicals pushing DEI and all the rest of this stuff.
	And finally, FreedomWorks, as I mentioned earlier, FreedomWorks is closing.
	This is a think tank that was there.
	I had experience with them back in 2009.
	They had a contest that they put out, and I was doing a lot of video contests in 2009.
	I won the contest. It was about, they needed like a two or three minute video talking about entrepreneurship.
	So I talked about my family and history, my father, both my grandfathers.
	And then we talked about what Karen and I had done with the video stores.
	Put it in a video and we won.
	So we got to go up to Chicago.
	We had a great time.
	Got to meet the people that were running FreedomWorks at the same time.
	The thing that we remember the most, though, was that it was just a vacation with the two of us.
	And we got to...
	We wanted, I wanted to ride on a Segway and we had a great time because it turns out that when we bought the tickets, the guy did not have a typical Segway tour.
	Instead, he was showing somebody who was going to be a tour director, kind of showing her the ropes.
	And so he was talking to her and taking her all the different places and taking extra time.
	Our tour was about three times as long as it would have normally been if we'd been with a regular tour.
	And it was just the two of them and the two of us.
	And while he was talking to her about other things, Karen and I were like doing loops around different things and stuff.
	We went all over the place in Chicago.
	We had a blast. Looked really, really, you know, get on one of those things.
	Don't ever look at a picture of yourself on one of them.
	But... It looked really stupid, but it was a lot of fun.
	I still remember that. That's what I think about when I think about FreedomWorks.
	I think about the Segway tours.
	But it was nice, and like I said, they paid for the trip, and we won some money off of it.
	Dick Armey was running it at the time.
	He was the number two guy under Newt Gingrich, and as I said earlier, he was an economist, Austrian school, Mises.
	Politico is covering the demise of FreedomWorks.
	I said, FreedomWorks, the once-swaggering conservative organization that helped to turn Tea Party protesters into national political force, is shutting down, according to its president, a casualty of the ideological split in the Republican Party dominated by Trump.
	We're dissolved, said the group's president, Adam Brandon.
	It's effective immediately.
	Why? Well, because principles don't matter.
	Because the GOP has become a cult of personality.
	And if you think principles matter, you're not paying attention to what Speaker Johnson is doing either.
	FreedomWorks laid off about 40% of its staff last year.
	After Trump took control of the conservative movement, Brandon said, the CEO, president, after Trump took control of the conservative movement, a huge gap opened up between the libertarian principles of FreedomWorks leadership and the MAGA-style populism of its members.
	Yeah, I noticed. Yeah, me too.
	Our staff became divided into MAGA and into Never Trump factions.
	Well, there you go. Mission accomplished by the Democrat, Donald Trump, the New York liberal ally of the Clintons, of Epstein, of The tranny-pushing, tyranny-pushing, gun-grabbing, J6-baiting, lockdown-loving, gene-injecting, Benedict Donald.
	And he has divided up the Republican Party between people who don't care about principle anymore.
	All that matters is winning.
	Winning. 4-D chess.
	Donors, he said, are saying, what are you doing for Trump today?
	And that's exactly what happens.
	I mean, I've had so many people contact me with hate about this stuff.
	I've had friends who said, yeah, you know, my mom really liked it.
	I recommended your show to my mom who's older, who's my age.
	She really liked what you're doing, but she hated it when she started attacking Trump and doesn't listen to it anymore.
	Yeah, I know. I know.
	So... We're not for or against Trump, he said.
	We're for Trump if he's doing what we agree with, and we're against him if he's not.
	Huh. That's funny.
	You've heard me say it.
	That's exactly what I told Alex in October of 2016, just before that first election.
	He said, what do we do if Trump wins?
	I said, well, it's easy. We support him when he does the right thing.
	We oppose him when he does the wrong thing.
	Alex looks at me for a second or two, and he goes, hmm, and he walks out.
	Yeah, that wasn't what Alex was going to do.
	Alex was going to support him regardless of what he did.
	He could lock us down.
	He could roll out the FEMA camps.
	He could inject us to depopulate the country and the world, and he'd still support it.
	Why? Well, because he doesn't want to go the way of FreedomWorks.
	He knows what people want.
	He's going to give them what they want.
	He knows what his handlers want him to push.
	And he'll do that as well.
	And so I think I've seen the erosion of conservative donors, said the person there at FreedomWorks on the board.
	Others called to complain that we weren't doing enough to help Trump.
	He said he resolved to keep a working relationship safe.
	Why? Because the MAGA people don't care about issues.
	They're never going to make any changes.
	They don't have any principles.
	What changes things?
	You know, the liberal anthropologist got it right.
	Things are changed by a small group of determined people who focus around principles.
	It's not changed by a mob that just floats around with whatever this grifting, opportunistic politician without any principles has to say at any given moment.
	FreedomWorks employee claimed the organization under this leadership had turned its back on its values while Trump was in office.
	You know, we talk about FreedomWorks.
	Sometimes, maybe what we should say is freedom matters.
	Here's a clip from a few years ago when the Canadian truckers were protesting what Trudeau was doing.
	And you could look at this and say, well, you know, they're doing this because they want to keep their trucks and things like that and be able to go back and forth across the border and they're making it impossible to do that.
	But they understood that they could lose everything.
	They weren't doing this to protect their jobs.
	They were doing it because freedom mattered.
	Not because freedom works, but because freedom matters.
	Here's what this trucker said.
	Are you prepared to lose your truck?
	Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	Come take my truck, do whatever you got to do.
	It's fine.
	Well, because it's just a material possession, right?
	Freedom is something much more than that.
	So take my possessions, put me in jail, sue me, do whatever you gotta do.
	♪♪
	Liberty. It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Because that is the essence of our freedom and our liberty.
	It is the first thing that they come after.
	They don't shut down our stores first.
	They don't come up with their injections first.
	No, the first thing they do is to take our free speech.
	And we look at what is happening in Canada right now.
	It is absolutely astounding.
	Never seen anything like this.
	Certainly not in modern times.
	We've seen some of these types of things that were done centuries ago in Western civilization.
	We had wars.
	A lot of people died.
	To make sure we didn't have the kind of society that's going to be imposed if this thing passes, this pet project of Justin Castro, the commie censor.
	If he gets this stuff passed, we're going to see things that Western civilization has not seen for half a millennium or more.
	The Star Chamber things, retroactive prosecutions, pre-crime even.
	Just raw tyranny, folks.
	You can look at this. You arrest somebody before they do a crime.
	You arrest somebody for something that wasn't illegal when they did it.
	You shut down people's speech.
	You let people anonymously accuse them without penalty and don't let them confront their accusers.
	You do all these things.
	This is just a campaign of political terror.
	That's all it is.
	And that's what is happening here with Justin Castro.
	The draconian finds even worse for small startup companies than it is for established companies like Twitter and others.
	And so as people are looking at this, commenting on it on social media, one person says the investigatory powers are invasive.
	They are rife for abuse.
	The commission orders seem to carry the weight of courts without being banned by the usual process of the courts.
	In other words, there's no due process.
	As Benedict Donald said, just take the gun and do the due process later.
	Well, that's not due process.
	And they won't do it later.
	And if they take the speech, you won't get due process later either.
	Another person says, quotes, the maximum penalty for violation is not more than 6% of the gross global revenue of the person that is believed to have committed the violation, or $10 million.
	Here's the sticker. Whichever is greater.
	So that means that if 6% of your gross global revenue, Does not come out to $10 million.
	They'll still charge you with $10 million.
	So what's this about? This is about shutting down any upstarts or startups, right?
	This is about stopping any small companies.
	If somebody thinks that they're going to go into competition with the big guys, a $10 million fine about that.
	You got something like Gab started by one individual?
	No, no. We'll hit you with a $10 million fine.
	And because it's whichever is greater, not smaller.
	So it's capped at $10 million unless your revenue is greater.
	Then they'll go with a 6% figure.
	And I think another aspect of that It's perhaps maybe even to take away some of the opposition from the big guys, because for two reasons.
	Number one, it would shut down their competitors.
	They're always worried about shutting down their competitors.
	If they only said the cap was 6% without the $10 million part, then a small startup could probably survive that.
	But by making it the greater of 6% or $10 million, That'd kill a small startup.
	But it would remain capped in order to protect large companies.
	So these companies look at this and they say, well, first of all, it's going to cut down on my competition.
	We're not going to have to worry about somebody new coming in.
	That's what they're always worried about.
	That's why you have so many of the regulations, even at the local level, against starting up a restaurant or something like that, because the established restaurants will use the local government to keep competition out.
	It's the genesis for many of the regulations about safety and emissions and all the rest of this stuff and a fuel economy that the big Detroit companies would whine about, but they could comply with it, and they would work with the Congress to make sure that there was a time frame there that they could comply with it, and it would keep out other competition.
	And so the same type of thing that we see here.
	An absolute legal abomination, said another, even before considering the insane punishments, it is at odds with liberal democratic foundational principle that you cannot legislate things retroactively.
	Another says, Canada might as well change its name to the People's Republic of Trudonia.
	The way they're going down, you know, some Marx Brothers.
	Farce is what it is.
	They're going down the path of adopting People's Republic of China-inspired policies.
	Trudeau is known for admiring the power of Chinese-style dictatorship.
	And they quote it. He says, this is Trudeau.
	There is a level of admiration I actually have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime.
	Having a dictatorship where you can do whatever you wanted.
	I find that to be quite interesting, he said.
	More than once he said that.
	Which country...
	Do you admire? I know, other than Canada, which I know you're going to say, but other than Canada, which country do you most admire?
	Well, China, because they can do whatever they want to save the environment, and they don't have to get tied up in all kinds of legal hassles and everything.
	So now he wants to shut down people's speech, and he has this bill that'll let him do that without getting tied up in all these kind of legal issues.
	Details and things like that.
	If you look at another aspect of this, house arrest for people who are deemed to be likely to commit hate crimes in the future.
	So they can get you for what you've done in the past before the law was written.
	They can arrest you for not even having violated their law because they think that you might do it in the future.
	In other words, you're a political enemy.
	Yeah, the people who are most likely to offend.
	I guess you get voted. Who's most likely to succeed?
	Who is most likely to offend?
	Well, maybe we should need to start saying who's most likely to secede.
	Is it Alberta? Is it some other province that's out there?
	It used to have a t-shirt that said, if at first you don't secede, try, try again.
	Hate speech. The end of Western civilization.
	A blank check for tyranny.
	And so they want to crack down on cyberbullying.
	They're talking about trans agenda there.
	And they're talking about religion with that as well.
	And again, we should remember that speech is never a crime if you have free speech.
	Speech is never a crime.
	But censorship is always a crime.
	The legislation goes on to define harmful content as content that, quote, So you better just shut up.
	If they don't like your politics...
	They're going to put you in jail or put you under house arrest because you might say something about that.
	So I guess, yeah, have house churches because everybody, all the Christians will be under house arrest, won't they?
	For greater certainty and for the purposes of defining, quote, content that foments hatred, unquote, the bill says content does not express detestation or vilification solely because it expresses disdain or dislike or discredits, humiliates, hurts, or offends. So it's even broader than that, right?
	And so this snowflake tyranny, if you hurt or offend somebody with what you have to say, well, now you go to jail.
	Now you get a massive fine.
	It's like what Alan Dershowitz, this tyrannical Harvard lawyer, hurt a Jew, we sue, right?
	You hurt my feelings.
	I'm going to sue you in court.
	I'm going to, you know, bankrupt you with legal fees and all this other kind of stuff because I don't like you.
	And this is what I say.
	You're either going to have free speech, and if you have free speech, some people are going to be offended.
	Too bad. Too bad.
	I really don't care, frankly.
	We've got to get over this.
	They have intimidated us, and a lot of the worst of it is with Christians.
	Oh, let's not offend anybody.
	Let's be winsome so that we can win some to Christ.
	I've heard all that stuff.
	It's like, no. You need to focus on the truth.
	You need to focus on the free exercise of religion.
	You need to focus on, you know, do it as lovingly as you can, but never run away from the truth.
	Never. So, the legislation doesn't explain how the words like offend or hurt or humiliate or discredit or dislike or disdain or detest or vilify, how are those to be interpreted?
	And are they embedded in some kind of a hierarchy of seriousness?
	In other words, is it more serious to discredit somebody than it is to disdain somebody?
	Or to detest or vilify them?
	Which of those are more serious?
	Well, we'll just decide when we get to it.
	Creating a new standalone hate crime offense and granting judges the power to put someone under house arrest if they feel that they are likely to engage in hateful conduct.
	Now we've gone beyond Brazil and 1984 and Brave New World.
	In a novel take on dystopian science fiction concept of pre-crime, if a judge believes that there's reasonable grounds to fear a future hate crime may be committed, a judge, not a jury, by the way, The guilty until proven innocent party would be brought before a provincial court to determine whether they were a probable offender,
	likely at some point in the unspecified future, whether they were likely to generate hate propaganda.
	That's what they talk about, hate propaganda.
	An offending thought criminal would then have to wear an electronic monitoring device, return to and remain at their place of residence at specified times, and would have to abstain from the consumption of drugs or alcohol or any other intoxicating substance.
	The free speech union says, presumably, this is in case these substances might loosen their hateful mouths.
	Failure to comply with these restrictions would result in a prison sentence of up to a year.
	In a title, the Attorney General, Arif Virani of Canada, has now also been given an Orwellian title that George Orwell would be proud of.
	Justice Minister. Justice Minister.
	And in his capacity, they describe this measure of putting people under house arrest because they might commit a hate crime in the future.
	He calls this a peace bond.
	Yeah. Total Orwellianism.
	He said it could prove to be very, very important to restrain the behavior of somebody with a track record of hateful behavior.
	He said, if there's a genuine fear of escalation, then an individual or a group could come forward and seek a peace bond against them and prevent them from doing certain things, he said.
	What is really critical here is that it gives the judge, not a jury, the judge, a wonderful range of sentences.
	This is the complete totalitarian mindset of these people.
	How can we give freedom to our prosecutors?
	Not how can we protect them.
	People from an activist, tyrannical government, you see, everything has flipped, the mindset has flipped upside down, just as it has in the trade-off between security and liberty.
	There is no trade-off between security and safety on the one hand and liberty on the other.
	There isn't. There isn't.
	They can keep you safe in a jail cell, but you don't have any liberty, and that's where you ultimately go.
	Every time you slice off some of your liberty for the promise of safety and security, to that extent you become more and more of a slave, of a prisoner to these people.
	And so they want to have a wonderful range of things that a judge can do to people without a jury of their peers present.
	And you can have any individual come forward and essentially initiate an indictment, a prosecution against somebody.
	And there is no penalty for that if it is frivolous or false.
	They don't have to pay for the defendant's legal fees.
	I think they can even do it anonymously.
	In addition to creating this new criminal category of pre-hate crime, Bill C-63 establishes the offense of communicating hate speech.
	It amends the Canadian Human Rights Act, because, you know, we can't have any human rights in Canada, if Trudeau gets his way.
	Making online hate speech a discriminatory practice and establishing a tribunal.
	To be known as the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, which will address complaints of online hate speech, as well as hate speech perpetrated by other means of telecommunication.
	This part of the legislation appears to apply retroactively, meaning a person can be brought before the tribunal for any material posted online, regardless of its publication date.
	Anonymous accusations, secret testimony are also permitted at the tribunal's discretion.
	That's why, look, none of this stuff is new, folks.
	We're just being brought back to the days of the Star Chambers and the Bridge of Sighs and all these tyrannies that we have seen.
	We have the things that are in the Bill of Rights for a reason, that you should be able to address the charges against you, confront your accusers, have a jury made up of your peers.
	Not face excessive fines or punishment and all the rest of this stuff.
	And these people have been slicing this stuff away and it's all gone now.
	It's all gone.
	And even worse than that, the mindset of most people is such that they don't even understand why we had those guardrails there and the importance of them.
	But let me tell you, these people who are writing these laws, these judges, these ministers, this Justin Castro, they understand exactly what they're doing.
	So, anonymous accusations, secret testimony, all the rest of this stuff, permitted.
	At the discretion of the tribunal.
	And that's not their only discretion.
	You know, they have maximum fines, but then, of course, you know, the tribunal can go beyond that if they wish.
	The National Post points out this is a process that, quote, financially incentivizes complaints at essentially zero cost to the other people.
	Complaints are free to file.
	And at the conclusion of an inquisition, that's what it is, The panel, if they find you in relation to a discriminatory practice, you can be ordered to pay compensation to the person who filed this accusation against you for free.
	You can have to pay them $20,000.
	Up to $20,000 to any victim identified in the communication that constituted the discriminatory practice, if that person created or developed in whole or in part the hate speech to which the complaint relates.
	If the panel considers it appropriate, they can increase that $20,000 fine to $50,000.
	Because there is no limit to the number of complaints that can be made against you, there is no cap Small wonder, then, says...
	Free Speech Union in the UK. Small wonder then that Jordan Peterson, who is in Canada, psychologist and author, recently sanctioned by his professional regulator, the College of Psychologists of Ontario, for what it described as degrading online posts about Justin Castro.
	About climate change hysteria.
	About trans ideology.
	Says that under Bill C-63, his criminalization and presumably bankruptcy would be a certainty.
	They could take all of his money, throw him in jail for life.
	Jordan Peterson. They don't like him.
	This is full-on tyranny.
	This is medieval tyranny.
	Secret, anonymous accusers, incentivized with cash to come after people.
	And, you know, this Star Chamber process.
	The Canadian journalist and gender-critical feminist Megan Murphy has also expressed concern about how the new tribunal system will affect somebody like her, whose criticisms of gender identity and ideology already are considered to be transphobic hate speech by the government-funded Canadian Anti-Hate Network.
	Last year, for instance, she had an event that she was booked to speak at, and it was canceled by the venue.
	They cited concerns that the purpose of this event is to promote or would have the effect of promoting discrimination or hatred for any group or person on the basis of sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, or any other similar factor.
	She said there had been no indication or evidence that there would be any discrimination or hatred expressed at the event.
	It was entitled Inclusivity, Gender Identity, and Women's Rights, yet I had essentially been accused of pre-crime because she was a feminist who was pushing back against the transgender agenda.
	But it would be especially effective at coming after Bible-believing churches.
	House arrest. For even being a Christian.
	Preemptive gagging of a Christian pastor who is likely to offend somebody.
	Yes, Christ is an offense.
	We know that. Always has been.
	Imprisoned Christians for their hate speech.
	That will be one of the outcomes for certain of this.
	Expressions that vilify an individual or a group based on prohibited grounds of discrimination.
	Or likely to foment detestation or vilification.
	This is not just an infringement of free speech.
	This is an assault on Christ and the church.
	Because they are not going to distinguish between the sinner and sin.
	They identify themselves by their sins.
	That's one of the reasons why we say, look, we don't hate the sinner.
	We're trying to tell the sinner how they can find Christ.
	Grace is free. And we just tell people, don't turn your back on God.
	He's got a way here for you to remove this.
	God will remove this as far as the east is from the west.
	He'll never hold this against you.
	You can have a new life beginning now.
	You can have eternal life, but you have to turn from your sin.
	You have to reject.
	You have to hate your sin and turn from it.
	So we're trying to save the sinner, but we're not going to embrace the sin.
	The problem is, is that the government and a lot of these people identify themselves by their sin.
	And that is their addiction.
	It is their idol.
	It is their God.
	They spend all their waking moments thinking about their drugs or their porn or their cross-dressing or whatever it is.
	That is their identity. That is who they see themselves as being.
	So these people are going to take this as an attack upon them.
	This is about policing morality.
	According to a secular progressive standard, while silencing any objection to sexual immorality, So that perverts can deaden their consciences against the pervasive call of repentance.
	And it threatens the very heart of religious expression and dialogue.
	It threatens the very heart of Christianity.
	As I said, I felt sorry for Trump because looking at these old clips when he was asked multiple times in multiple interviews, the people he would always avoid it, they would come back and press him on the issue.
	Have you asked God for forgiveness?
	He doesn't think he needs it.
	That is the heart.
	Of the good news. You have to understand that you're a sinner in need of forgiveness, but also the good news is that there is complete forgiveness available to us for what Christ has done.
	But they're going to shut that down completely with these laws.
	This bill does nothing to protect people.
	It only harms people physically and spiritually.
	And it challenges people.
	All the principles of the free exercise of religion.
	All the principles of free speech.
	And, of course, it challenges all the principles of due process, a fair trial, resumption of innocence.
	All of this stuff is thrown out the door.
	And why is this important?
	Well, because when you look at Europe and you look at Canada, you see that, first of all, they're coming after Elon Musk at this point is not on board with this.
	And so, you know, they're trying to shut him down.
	Anybody that doesn't do this, this is a global governance move because the Internet is global.
	So you've got Canada, you've got EU, presumably after the election, the United States will be coming after anybody who supports free speech on the Internet.
	They'll use it as a weapon.
	And when you see this happening, as bad as it is, this is not limited to Canada.
	Remember, Trudeau is one of their stars.
	Justin Trudeau is one of the people that they've chosen to carry the torch for them.
	He is the, you know, the shock troop going out there, taking this stuff out.
	And they will, whatever he gets through, that's going to find its way to other places as well.
	So that will eventually come to the United States as well, because it is a global agenda.
	And they're just using Trudeau and Canada as a test case.
	They're using him to move the Overton window.
	They're moving him to shut down Western civilization.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come back with Tony Arterman, and we're going to talk a little bit about what's happening with gold.
	We have some interesting things, interesting phenomenon that are happening in China at the retail level.
	We'll tell you about it when we come back.
	I'm sorry.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for watching.
	you you Alright, welcome back. And joining us now is Tony Arterman of Wise Wolf Gold.
	And Tony has set up David Knight Gold that will take you to his company and let him know that you came through me.
	When you get there, you can buy gold or silver.
	Large or small transactions, Tony can handle it.
	He also has a way for people to gradually save on a regular basis.
	It's a group buying program.
	He calls it Wolfpack. And so you can get into that, have the, you know, just set aside a certain amount that you're going to accumulate each month, a great savings program to do that, as well as get the advantages of a group buy.
	So thank you for joining us, Tony.
	Good to see you again.
	Good to see you, David. Thanks for having me back.
	You know, we were talking in the break about these gold beans in China.
	You've heard about that as well.
	And it's become, you know, part of that is the retail trade that they're talking about.
	But they've actually created a little instrument there.
	And, you know, people are getting, I think, a 13th of an ounce in the form of a gold bean.
	Very popular. Well, it's popular, it's convenient, it's affordable, and the people of China, they're crazy about gold.
	There's 60,000 gold mines in China.
	China is breaking all kinds of records importing gold, manufacturing, and that's been the trend since the beginning of this century.
	China's been buying... You know, it's interesting.
	China's been buying gold off the books, which is an open question.
	Why? Why aren't they buying gold off?
	Wouldn't they want the world to know what their gold reserves are?
	And Kitco's talked about this before.
	There's some journalism and some studies into China's gold reserves and China.
	No one really knows how much they have.
	It's an open question.
	And they could actually have more gold than the United States, who hasn't been a buyer since the 1950s.
	We supposedly have something around 8,000 and a half tons or so.
	It's estimated that China may, the government may have somewhere around 16,000.
	We don't know. This is, again, it's speculation why they would be buying off the books at the beginning of the century.
	But you go back to the people and using the small fractional gold.
	That's the only way you can use gold almost anymore.
	If you're a regular person, at close to $2,400 an ounce, David, it makes sense to have fractionalized tradable pieces that you can use.
	We do that with Wolfpack.
	I buy the large sheets of 100-gram bars and we break them apart so you have a gram bar of gold.
	That's an easily weighable, tradable...
	A fractionalized piece of gold, but I think you're going to see more and more of this.
	And you even do that with silver.
	I've gotten some of the silver breakable, you know, things that you can break them down into smaller quantities as well.
	Absolutely. And then, you know, we also have the gold backs and things like that.
	It's important because, you know, one of the things about these little gold beans that they wrote the article about, it's about a thirteenth of an ounce, so right now it's about 80 bucks that these people are doing.
	So it's small incremental things, and sometimes you need to go even smaller than that.
	That's why you got the kind of little chiclet break-off things that are there.
	That's one of the reasons why you would have silver, because one of the key things that we're looking at is the fact that we want to be able to survive when they crash this financial system.
	That's what the local Tennessee legislators like Frank Nicely are looking at when they say, well, if they really screw this thing up, if they have an accident and they blow the system up, or if they do it deliberately, we need to have some way that we can continue the business of the state.
	Well, we need to have that at an individual level as well.
	We need to be able to... To continue, we have to have some medium of exchange.
	We have to have some wealth that has been retained and some liquidity.
	And so that's what all this stuff is about.
	So I think we're going to see more and more of these small things showing up, I think.
	Well, I think that's the key, is being able to have the actual physical gold in your hand when the system resets.
	Because that's what they're doing.
	It's a great reset.
	They're telling you what they're doing. And countries around the world, the trend right now It's absolutely amazing.
	If you look at the charts going back to 2009, David, there was almost no central bank buying, almost zero central bank buying of gold.
	Now it's off the charts. The IMF is warning that countries are getting off of the dollar for national security reasons.
	This is the IMF, the International Monetary Fund, is talking about countries abandoning the dollar system for national security reasons.
	Saudi Arabia We're good to go.
	Ten years ago, five years ago, the Chinese people weren't buying massive amounts of fractionalized gold and trading in it.
	India always has been a gold buyer, but not like it is now.
	It's really a phenomenon.
	It's accelerating. I think what's happening is gold...
	It's retaining its natural place, supplanting the dollar as the world's reserve currency.
	And I think countries are figuring out how to do cross-border payments, and that's part of the new BRICS system.
	Zimbabwe is doing that.
	It's using a digitized, fractionalized gold system.
	They've also gone on the record, now this is government saying this, I don't believe them, but they're saying they're not going to create more digitized units than they have reserves in gold, because Zimbabwe It was always the joke, you know, they have the trillion dollar notes.
	But I think the lesson learned since 1971, Nixon took us off the gold standard, all these, you know, most other countries followed suit and went to a fiat currency.
	The last holdout was Switzerland in 2002 had a silverback currency.
	And then after that, it's a free fall.
	We've had 52 times more currency printed since 1980 that exists today.
	52 times more currency on Earth since 1980.
	So you have this fiat debt bomb that's going off, and there's going to be a revaluation of everything, especially since the dollar is losing so much ground.
	It's kind of interesting to hear that from Zimbabwe.
	Yeah, we're not going to print more of these things than we got gold back in.
	That was the lie from Bretton Woods 1, wasn't it?
	They're recycling that thing.
	And then everybody realizes they're bluffing.
	They do have gold in Fort Knox.
	We don't even know if there's any gold in Fort Knox anymore.
	We certainly don't know how much is there.
	Just like you were talking about China.
	Nobody knows. These countries keep everything secret.
	That's their secret hand in this game of poker.
	How much gold do they really have?
	We're not allowed to see the chips that they've got on the table because they're not on the table.
	They're under the table somewhere.
	That's true. And then we've talked about this before, the secrecy of where their gold is held.
	And they don't make a big deal about it.
	And of course, governments, you know, we always have these national ad campaigns.
	The government never tells you, like, make sure you have a little bit of gold and silver on hand in case inflation really kicks in.
	What do they tell you? They tell you to feed the pig.
	They have feedthepig.org.
	They tell you to feed your piggy bank with fiat currency.
	They don't tell you to go get gold.
	And of course, the Federal Reserve and the central bank here, we don't buy gold.
	We don't do that here in the United States because, again, if gold demand drives the price of gold up, the dollar is at war with gold.
	It's its natural enemy since becoming a fiat currency.
	And I think that's what's happening around the world, David.
	The countries are moving away from the dollar.
	They're getting into gold reserves.
	They're looking at cross-border payment systems backed by something else.
	So the dollar's in real trouble.
	We're watching this in real time, and it is truly amazing.
	Yeah, you know, this article where they're talking about the little golden beans that are there, it's actually from the New York Times.
	That's how mainstream this has all become.
	And we're not even talking about, this is not a buy gold publication type of thing.
	This is not even a financial publication.
	This is the New York Times talking about this.
	And one of the things that they said was, they said, you know, in the New York Times they said there's been a 50% increase in the global price of gold since late 2022.
	And they said gold prices went even higher last month because people were concerned about what the Fed was doing, but they said now what's driving it is what's happening in China.
	What is happening with the central bank in China and what is happening with the people who are out there buying the gold beans or whatever, they said the flow of gold into China has gone from solid to an absolute torrent.
	And that was the whole point of this article, to talk about that, and then to talk about, well, this is this person, this is what they do for a living, you know, they've got kind of a middle-class job or whatever, and they're going down and have been accumulating these little gold beans and all this kind of stuff.
	I guess, you know, we're laughing about this during the break.
	I said, yeah, kind of, they're bean counters now.
	They've got their own... Their own personal accounting system.
	They're counting the little gold beans that they've been saving up.
	But it's literally bean counters that they've got now.
	Everything comes back around, doesn't it?
	It truly does.
	And if you watch the headlines, it's funny.
	We used to watch the Federal Reserve, you look at the Central Bank of the United States, look to see what they're doing with interest rates, what's going to happen to the market, are they going to lower, are they going to stay the same, are they hawkish, are they going to raise interest rates?
	And then you look at the Bank of England, the Bank of Europe, Central Banks, they've kept rates the same, so is the United States, but gold moves on.
	Isn't that interesting?
	They've kept rates the same, and it doesn't follow what they do anymore like it did.
	That was the big push to see what was going to happen with metals, and David, because of Central Bank gold demand, and I think maybe finally the mainstream networks are catching onto this.
	There's something happening outside of our own markets, and it's macro, it's huge.
	The macro consequences, and you mentioned, why did they all start buying gold at the end of 2022?
	Well, it's because of the invasion of Ukraine by Russia and then the massive sanctions by the United States and the SWIFT system and all the punitive measures taken by our government and the West in general.
	And I think a lot of these countries took notice.
	They started abandoning the dollar.
	They wanted to get off. They saw the vulnerability that they have if they have to deal with the dollar.
	And so you see the amount of crude oil that Russia's just going direct to China, going direct to India, moving around the sanctions.
	This is massive shifts geopolitically, David.
	And I think we're only going to see more and more of it as the dollar declines.
	I agree. Yeah, this New York Times article, they mention both those things.
	They say, well, you know, the thing that really kind of kicked this off was when the United States had these sanctions.
	they don't say Biden. They're partisan, so they're not going to name him just like the conservatives won't name Trump with any of this stuff.
	But you know, they won't name Biden about that.
	But they say, yeah, that was kind of changed everybody's mind and started kicking this off. And then in another place, they'll say, and since 2022, it's gone up by 50% the price of gold. You know, you get right to the point.
	He said that's because those two things related. They don't make that kind of connection there.
	But then elsewhere in the article, they talk about the fact that China is divesting itself of American dollars. They said what they're using, what they're doing now, they are buying their gold with American dollars to get out of it gradually.
	And the fact that China has reduced its Treasury holdings for more than a decade, they said as of March, China had about 775 billion dollars worth of US debt down from 1.1 trillion in 2021. So in three years, they've dropped it 30%.
	So they're gradually...
	They can't sell everything off all at once because they'll crash their own investment in it.
	But they're getting rid of it at a pace of about 10% a year.
	That's what they're trying to mark it down with.
	At one time, the Chinese held about $3 trillion in treasuries.
	And now they hold about $700 billion and are declining.
	So... If nobody's taking part in this, it's like Tinkerbell, right?
	If you don't clap, she dies.
	This is the dollar. If you don't use it, if there's not money velocity, it dies.
	It goes away. And I think that's what people don't understand here in this country, is there's a reason why you haven't had hyperinflation.
	Even with all the stupidity and on-purpose controlled demolition in Washington, D.C., it still survives.
	It still continues because people around the world still have a demand for it, even though it's fake. It's psychological. They use it It's in circulation. It's something called money velocity.
	I don't understand it completely. I don't pretend to I just know that History teaches me that all paper currencies backed by nothing go to zero without an exception So if I know this going into what the everything else is window dressing, it's just like, you know, speculative what's gonna happen in the interim, but we know that fiat currencies go to zero and Especially since the dollar has been so abused. We probably this going into what the everything else is window dressing it's just like you know speculative what's gonna happen in the interim but we know that fiat currencies go to zero and especially since the dollar has been so abused we probably could have lasted a lot longer given the strength of our economy and
	our position in the world but we just on purpose tanked everything you know geopolitically economically internally the corruption levels off the charts and even Biden's own economic advisors David one of them who wrote an article for the New York Times said that we should lose the world's reserve currency status to be better off for our economy who are these people how would you get away with How would you have a massive loss of purchasing power and retain a strong economy?
	It's impossible. So I don't know how this ends, especially for our country, but I do know that people that are reliant on the system and saving fiat currency, I think it was Michael Saylor recently, the Bitcoin advocate, he said, what do you call people who save fiat currency?
	We call them poor. Yeah.
	Yeah, that's right. That's right.
	When you look at the statement that you just had there from the guy in the Biden administration, it'd be better if we don't have the world's reserve currency status.
	It's like, how in the world could they even say that?
	Because that's really their superpower, right?
	That's the way they control everything, even internally, domestically.
	Joe, we'll just print some more money, and we'll give it to you if you do what we say.
	We'll take it away from you if you don't do what we say.
	But that has been their superpower to do whatever they wish as a government.
	So you have to look at this and say, are they really that stupid?
	Or are they really that suicidal?
	And both of those things are really frightening.
	And it is something that is not limited just to the Biden administration.
	He got it a lot, made it a lot worse, and of course all the stuff about the sanctions that it kicked off on Russia, that's 100% on him.
	But the foundation of this, whether we're talking about the commercial real estate stuff, or whether we're talking about bank collapses and stuff, and of course the bank collapses are happening now because of the Federal Reserve rapidly raising the interest rate.
	Never seen it go that fast, that high, that fast in history.
	So these banks could not respond to it.
	So now we're looking at a lot of banks that are perhaps going to be failing very soon.
	I got a management consulting firm warning that a half dozen banks would fail in just a few weeks.
	And he said that back on April the 30th.
	So We'll see if that happens, but he's got a proprietary way of looking at a lot of different metrics and balance sheets of these banks, and that's really what they do, and he made that statement at the Bank Holding Company Association Spring Seminar.
	So we're in a really shaky position, and the question is, is it because they're so stupid or because they are really trying to To execute their great reset on us, and they don't care if it hurts their power as long as they can destroy the American middle class and America as a financial and military stronghold.
	I think that's the proper question, because the people that run this country hate this country.
	I think that's pretty apparent, or that we'd be a lot better off.
	What was it? Strow Talbot, back in the 90s, Secretary of State for Bill Clinton, said the nation-state was irrelevant.
	Now, this is the Secretary of State.
	The nation-state is becoming irrelevant.
	They're one-world government devotees for Davos.
	These are people that are working for the World Economic Forum.
	This is the elite.
	And, of course, they all run in the same circles, and Gore Vidal said it's not a conspiracy if they all think alike, but it certainly is a conspiracy.
	The commercial that the World Economic Forum had in 2016, what was the first opening phrase of that commercial?
	Imagine a world where the United States isn't the lone superpower anymore.
	They had this planned, and the calls are coming from inside the house.
	It's not that hard to figure out.
	So you can't be that monumental of an idiot and rise to that high of advising the president on economics and thinking that you can take away trillions in circulation and usability of a currency and dump it back into the United States, devalue it and still have a strong economy.
	I think they've already built their lifeboats.
	They have their golden parachutes.
	They know exactly where they're going.
	This is to take out and neutralize what was left of the strength, the heart and soul of the United States of America.
	And it started with de-industrializing the heartland, making it the Rust Belt, taking away our pride and making the ability to have living wage jobs and have families and all these things and stability, being able to be self-sufficient.
	It started with that.
	And again, you look at the last year we ran a trade surplus was 1973.
	It was the year that they created the Trilateral Commission.
	We've not run a trade surplus since.
	And, of course, that was on the heels of not only taking us off the gold standard in 1971, but the birth of the World Economic Forum, opening China.
	These things all go together.
	You fast forward to 2001, David, 90 days after 9-11, on the anniversary of the day that Hitler declared war on the United States, George W. Bush gave China most favored trading status of any nation for the WTO. Declaring war on the United States.
	That was 60 years to the day that Hitler declared war on the United States.
	That was December 11th. I don't know.
	That's where my mind goes.
	I key in on dates and things.
	I know they traffic in that.
	I kind of follow the elites.
	Well, I think there's a lot to that.
	You know, you go back and you look at the first Bilderberg meeting.
	It was 10 years to the day of the last victory of the Nazis at the place where they had their last victory.
	Right there, you know, the Bilderberg Hotel was right there where that bridge too far was.
	And it was, you know, headed by the prince and also by Lord Carrington, who had been instrumental in causing that defeat of Allied forces and that victory for the Nazis.
	Yeah, just all a coincidence, I'm sure.
	They've spent decades, since the end of World War I, with the Council on Foreign Relations and the Cecil Rhodes Roundtable intervention into our system.
	They've slowly just whittled away at the power structure of the United States, which was supposed to be free markets, sound money, economic nationalism, nationalism in general, borders, things like that.
	And look at what we've become, which is this flailing empire that's schizophrenic.
	We want to support and prop up Taiwan after we've cut diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979.
	It doesn't even make any sense.
	We don't have a border, but we're going to guard the borders in Ukraine.
	This is all just to confuse us because it looks like It just doesn't make any sense anywhere on paper.
	It does, though, if you're trying to bring us down from the inside.
	And I think the lifeblood of our country, unfortunately, is fiat currency, and it is our dollar.
	And a lot of people are going to get hurt when...
	I think they're just going to pull the rug out from it.
	That's right. It may be, David, I don't want to be an alarmist, but it may be...
	What we're watching might be a gradually, then suddenly...
	It might just be that fast.
	I don't know. I'm hoping we just kind of get some more time and people can get acclimated because I think more people are starting to understand what fake money is because of inflation.
	They're just starting to ask questions they never asked before because they went too fast.
	You know, people would gradually go, well, I remember when you could do such and such for $5 and you can't do that.
	Wasn't it like a $5 sub at Subway is like $13 down or something crazy?
	Oh, yeah. Yeah, you had, as a matter of fact, there's a viral clip of somebody reacting to Jamie Demon of J.P. Morgan saying, oh, yeah, middle class is fine.
	They're still flush with all that COVID cash.
	And he's like, really? $1,200.
	Yeah. We're still living off that $1,200 that we got several years ago, four years ago.
	And I remember when Steve Mnuchin, the Goldman Sachs banker that Trump had there as a treasury head, he said, well, I don't think people need another $1,200 check.
	One's enough, I think.
	That's We don't want to spoil them, you know?
	Something like that. But I think last week, when you were doing the show last Friday, and thank you for doing that.
	Thank you for giving me some time off.
	But I heard you say, you quoted somebody, I think, if this was stupid, if it was a mistake...
	Eventually, they'd make a mistake in our favor, but they never do.
	And I think that's the real point. It was the first Secretary of Defense who was pushed out of a window at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
	He told that to Joe McCarthy, by the way.
	And then I think it was picked up later by Gary Allen, who wrote, None Dare Call It a Conspiracy.
	Yeah, yeah. So I think that's a good metric.
	I think that's a good description of both the Trump and the Biden administration.
	I think it's a good description of Congress under both Pelosi and Johnson.
	I think, you know, hey, if this was not a plot against us, eventually they would do something in our favor just by accident, but they never do.
	They just never do. Yeah. Yeah. Statistically, it would happen.
	We really lucked out on that one, high-fiving each other.
	Now we're doing much better.
	That never happens. It's just this gradual decline, watching the republic pass away, all our freedoms, the freedom of speech, the Bill of Rights, and then, of course, our economic power.
	I was talking to Travis.
	I can't even follow politics anymore.
	I don't even know. What are they doing?
	Is it just the trial of Trump and then Biden is incontinent?
	I don't know. Yeah, the big news this week that everybody's focused on is Stormy Daniels describing their encounter.
	But I was talking about that eventually to do something in your favor.
	You're talking about eventually flip heads or something like that.
	And Travis was laughing.
	He said, yeah, the play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, the guy's flipping a coin.
	It just keeps coming up.
	Was it heads or something, you know, over, Oh, heads again, heads again.
	I guess that's a Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead.
	And so is the United States government because they just keep flipping this coin that keeps coming up heads.
	So, uh, yeah, it's a, they've suspended reality, but we should believe it because it's the way it actually is.
	Right.
	Oh man.
	It's the way it actually is, and I think the more that you can internalize that and come to peace with it and then start figuring out, what do you do next?
	I mean, we're at the next level very soon, and the world is changing rapidly.
	I don't think... You're definitely not going to hear this kind of discussion on MSNBC or Fox or any kind of...
	They're going to run that play all the way to the end, and it's going to be about the election.
	I don't even know what the election's about anymore.
	Well, we haven't had the debates.
	I mean, yeah, the issues don't matter because we don't have any debates.
	So if the issues don't matter, you don't need to have debates.
	But, you know, when we look at this, yeah, we've seen this kind of inflation before.
	We've seen the inflation kicked off by attacking our energy supply and things like that.
	And we know that results in kind of a stagflation, or maybe this time, as Salenti has said, a dragflation.
	But, you know, when – so we've seen that type of stuff before.
	We've seen our government destroy the currency.
	What we haven't seen before is them destroying the reserve currency status of the dollar.
	We've had that through the lifetime of pretty much everybody, because even before the end of World War II, the United States was still kind of a de facto standard, because its economy was so strong, compared to everybody else, even during the Depression.
	But then there's another factor that we haven't seen before, and that's the move to the Digital Cashless Society.
	And one of the biggest banks in Australia is going to go 100% cashless this month.
	And the country of Australia is set to be functionally cashless by next year, which is just a few months away.
	And what I thought was interesting about this, Tony, was the fact that in this article, they had a reprint of the different stages because the bank was going to do it gradually.
	And so they said, well, here's what's going to happen, you know, beginning at the end of May, May 20th, this month, you won't be able to access over-the-counter services at the banks.
	You won't be able to deposit.
	This is one bank. It's called Macri, if I'm pronouncing that correctly.
	You won't be able to deposit or collect checks.
	You can't order new checkbooks.
	And then by November the 1st, you won't be able to write or deposit any personal checks, deposit or request bank checks.
	You won't be able to deposit cash.
	Or checks over the counter.
	And you won't be able to make a contribution or payment via check.
	And so gradually, they're going to pull this out.
	Now, they left one little caveat there to say, but we'll still let you get cash at the ATMs.
	We're going to stop all these services.
	We won't cash checks. We won't accept checks.
	We won't deposit checks. But we'll still let you take out cash.
	But then what is happening is throughout the country, you have all these retailers saying, we're not going to take cash anymore.
	And so this is the kind of gradual, progressive, iterative process that I think we're going to see in every country, but running out in Australia.
	They're a little bit ahead of this, just like candidates taking the lead on shutting down all free speech.
	Australia seems to be taking the lead on this cashless society aspect.
	Well, it's interesting, David.
	I bought the other day some collections in a state sale.
	This is a $1 note from 1917.
	They're a lot larger than the modern-day bills.
	And I think this would, I mean, the purchasing power of this to be about $200 today at least.
	Given our gold price and what gold was in 1917, which is kind of interesting, the evolution of cash.
	You know, first you get, these are notes that are backed by gold.
	You can turn them in at the gold window, and then it becomes a Federal Reserve note, right?
	And all that language goes away.
	I had a $20 bill in here recently that said, this is redeemable in lawful money.
	Not that the note itself was lawful money, but you can redeem it in lawful money with 1950s.
	And all that language goes away.
	So it's like a magic trick.
	They just start slowly taking away the props and slowly taking away everything until you're left holding nothing.
	And that's what the central bank digital currency is all about.
	You'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
	You'll be happy with our control and we'll monitor everything that you do and we'll be able to contract and expand the money supply in real time.
	But you talked about the bank failures and what that stems from, and of course they're predicting that.
	And we talk about how these economic advisors, how could they even think about us losing the world's reserve currency status?
	Well, let's think about what the endgame here is.
	I think they want to neutralize the United States.
	They want to put it into a second-rate, third-rate power so it gets it off the world stage the way that we've been, at least in the last hundred years.
	But the other aspect of that, in my opinion, is the ushering in of the central bank digital currency.
	So the crisis... It precipitates and brings in the...
	You have to ask for it.
	You have to let the vampire into the house.
	You have to let evil in.
	And that's some kind of karmic rule.
	And so we have to let evil in.
	And so we're going to ask for the central bank digital currency.
	And it's going to save us, David.
	It's going to save us all.
	And we just have to download this wallet.
	But that is the trend.
	The World Economic Forum put out a headline about a week ago saying they were celebrating and clapping for 98% of countries around the world adopting a central bank digital currency blueprint and having a plan in place.
	That's what Davos celebrates.
	That's That's their endgame is to control everything you do through the money supply.
	And fortunately for us, and what I'm watching, and I think you're watching too, is that this isn't the same country and this isn't the same world that it was 10 years ago.
	I think there's so many more people conscious of what This is what this plan is, and maybe they don't have all the information and all the pieces, and they're not tuned into the David Knight Show, but there's people that are absolutely aware that their money's fake, and they're getting outside of the system,
	and I think that's why crypto is popular, decentralized crypto, not FedCoin, not FedNow, but the real free market stuff, and of course, gold and silver, precious metals, the demand around the world is up, so they've got...
	I don't think it's going to be an easy transition for them, and they just may implement it, and it might not be as effective as they thought it was going to be.
	It's coming. All these countries are going to implement the central bank digital currency.
	It's just what they do. I mean, this is what the bankster class does.
	So we're going to have to put up with this, and we're going to have to fight it.
	The battle's far from over.
	Even if it's implemented, it's far from over because we're building a different system.
	We're building a parallel system, and we're outside of it.
	So I think... Regardless of these kind of headlines, and I know it's depressing.
	Here's another headline for you.
	The debt of the United States.
	We pay $1 million, or $2 million a minute.
	$2 million a minute on the debt.
	$2 million a minute. So that's the kind of headlines you see before they say, well, folks, we had a really good run.
	It's time for you to download and get your biometrics into the Fed coin, and, you know...
	Send your regards to Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell because they're going to control everything you do with your money at that point.
	And so I think people, though, are starting to understand that.
	And that's the key thing. And that's why they're so focused on speech.
	because they don't want people to be aware as you point out a lot of people are becoming aware of it I began the program yesterday talking about a lot of these grandiose plans like the Saudi Prince's you know 105 mile long city in the desert, that kind of stuff. But you know they got these grandiose plans Everybody's got a plan, as they all say, until you get punched in the face.
	And sometimes we don't even have to punch them in the face.
	Sometimes their own plans punch them in the face.
	And so, you know, they're not the wisest people.
	They're not all-powerful.
	God has a say for sure in all of this stuff.
	But I think one of the things that's so key for them is that they can keep people in the dark.
	And so if we can keep free speech alive, if we can get the messages out and get people to understand what their plans are, we have a very good chance of defeating them.
	I think we can even defeat them if people are slow to wake up because there are so many of us.
	And so I think that, you know, the longer we wait to react, the longer we wait to...
	Wake up to what their plan is and start to do something on our own, then the tougher it gets for us.
	But I'm optimistic because I'm a Christian and I know that God is in control with all this stuff.
	But I think it's very important.
	I really do appreciate what you do.
	You've got a show that comes on and follows this show immediately, right?
	Today? Yes, sir.
	Just right after your show on Rockfin and FreeWorld.fm, I have the Arterburn Radio Transmission, which is once a week.
	I still go out on some radio stations once a week.
	And it's a hodgepodge, precious metals, prepping, all that good stuff, parapolitics.
	Good. It's just a stream of consciousness.
	We'll see what I'm going to talk. I don't usually know until about five minutes prior.
	We'll just go through some headlines, but it's a lot of fun.
	That's great. I've got a comment here for you as well.
	This is on Rock Van from Michelle Obama.
	Thank you for the tip. It says, I love the silver coins you send me, Tony.
	They make me feel like a dwarf king lording over his treasure and Lord of the Rings.
	I love it. Yeah.
	You get more silver coins.
	That's the funny thing. That's what we used to do with the kids when they were little.
	It was like, well, would you rather have one of these $5 bills or would you rather have four of these ones?
	So that's the kind of thing.
	We're pretty meticulous on the invoices and I should probably publish it sometime.
	I work with Yeka.
	Yeka helps me, and she's got her own show, and she does...
	shows on carnivore diet and other things, but she works for wise wolf and else we put the invoices together and we were just really meticulous. Like what do we have and what would look, you know, what would, what would I want? And, and in that particular tier package, and, uh, we always do comparisons. We go to the other, like the big websites and we check out their prices. And I'm like my goal is always to beat them. So if you're part of Wolfpack, it's a, it takes about an hour or so, maybe a little bit longer to go through all the invoices to see every tier for every week.
	So we pay attention to it.
	And when you're getting those coins, like I thought about what coin you're going to get.
	I thought about how many goldbacks to put in.
	I thought about that. I thought about what products.
	And of course, a lot of products come through.
	Like yesterday, I bought another close to 500 ounces of silver.
	At the shop in Branson, that immediately goes into Wolfpack.
	And it was some really nice one-ounce silver rounds from a private mint.
	And they are replicas of what a mercury dime would look like if it was that big.
	Like it took the mercury dime, Lady Liberty or the Goddess Mercury, and they put it on a silver round.
	And that's just some of the neat stuff that comes out of Wolfpack.
	Yeah. I mean, that's a mind-boggling amount of work to have to decide.
	How many different tiers have you got with Wolfpack?
	That's a great question. I'd have to name them because it starts out with the kids, the wolf cub at 35, lone wolf, warrior wolf, alpha, wise wolf, and then the sage at 1,000, and then we have different tiers of zen.
	I'm not doing it anymore.
	The next thing that we're going to do, we're going to do an ACH where you can put in an electronic check to save on fees, and we're also going to accept Bitcoin.
	I'm working on that. I should have that done.
	Hopefully by next week, and I'll announce that.
	Maybe next week when I come on, we'll talk about that.
	But we're also going to add a few key things, and I don't want to spoil it, but we're going to add some things where you can just buy direct at a certain type of product, and I'll try to do the lowest price that I can.
	We're going to change the price daily, like go in in the morning, look at how the trades are going.
	We talked about the beans this morning.
	We're going to do something very similar to that with gram bars.
	So, like, you can buy them one at a time instead of having to get, you know, a whole wolf pack or something.
	But I'm trying to make it more and more convenient, and I'm learning as I go.
	That's good. That's good.
	Well, yeah, and we're going to need something like that if we're going to be able to use the gold and the silver for, as Catherine Austin Fitz says, financial transaction privacy, to be able to do that.
	And that is a key thing about gold and silver as well.
	As the fact that it's been around, there's a store of value...
	You know, it was interesting, the back and forth, the debate that was set up on Zero Hedge between Peter Schiff and Rubini on one side for gold, and then on the other side you had Scaramucci and somebody else.
	And so they're talking about, you know, debating gold versus Bitcoin.
	I think it's great that we've got multiple things that are out there.
	And, you know, the more things we've got that go against the fiat currencies and central banks, I think the better, quite frankly, because there's more targets for them to go after.
	There's only one thing. It's pretty easy for them to try to shoot that thing down.
	But the more things that there are out there, then the better for us to counteract them.
	So it's an interesting back and forth with that.
	But anything else you want to tell us about what's going on at Wise Wolf this week?
	Well, it's just a busy time, and we crossed over.
	I think we have close to 1,100 members of Wolfpack, and we're just really thankful for that.
	I'm looking to put different types of products in, so it's always staying on top of the invoices.
	It gets harder.
	The more people that join, I have to move faster on stuff, and I'm really watching the supply chain.
	I do think that it's weak.
	I do think that...
	It could crack at any time, and I watch how overloaded the exchanges are.
	This is just some inside information.
	If you watch the exchanges, how the lag time in them paying me for products or them processing products, it's astounding.
	A lot of people, and I think a lot of that gold's flowing out, like some of the people are cashing in because of record prices of gold, but the demand is still up.
	The demand is coming from somewhere.
	It's coming from, internationally, it's coming from central banks.
	So we're really watching everything close, David.
	But yeah, you can go to davidknight.gold.
	You can look at Wolfpack, any transaction, no matter how big or how small.
	And remember, the IRAs, 401Ks, all that, we can roll that over into...
	Physical precious metals.
	So go to davidknight.gold and if you want to call and talk to me, you absolutely can.
	I answer the phone all the time.
	People are surprised I answer my phone.
	I'm like, well, why wouldn't I? That's my business.
	That's great. I know you're really busy, and I know it's going to be more and more challenging as our financial system gets more and more challenging.
	It's always great to talk to you, Tony.
	Thank you so much. Thank you for doing the show last week.
	Always interesting when you do the show, I think.
	And again, his show is going to be immediately following this one today, his weekly radio show.
	And you have a regular Ardburn transmission that you do on a daily basis as well, but there's one that's going to follow the show immediately afterwards.
	Thank you so much for joining us, Tony.
	Thank you, David. Thank you.
	All right, folks, we'll be right back.
	All right.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.
	All right.
	you Making sense.
	Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	I want to talk a little bit about what is happening on...
	The various campuses.
	And I think it's interesting because, you know, whenever they want to run through their program of censorship, they've got the liberals all on board, don't they?
	And now how do we get the conservatives on board so that we can do censorship?
	Well, cue the pro-Palestinian...
	Marxist mob on these different campuses.
	And at George Washington University, remember last week I showed you how they had defaced and graffitied and put stickers and everything on the George Washington statue there at George Washington University.
	George Washington, the colonizer.
	And how evil he was.
	And now you've got these people out there, campus leaders, running a little show trial here.
	And it's a bunch of women wearing their little masks from the pandemic, in this particular case, as an act of rebellion and to anonymize them.
	But they're out there calling for the campus leaders to be beheaded.
	And by leaders, what we mean are the administration, the president, the provost, the board.
	They want them to be executed.
	They want them to be beheaded.
	Guillotine. You know, they're out there doing their little thing.
	Here's the charges against so-and-so and, you know, the person's name.
	What do you say? Guilty!
	Guillotine! Guillotine! Are they consciously going through the Jacobin Revolution?
	I said this at the very beginning. I said, you know, why are these people at these elite universities and other universities that are not particularly elite, why are they surprised about this?
	I mean, these people are Marxists.
	They're Jacobins.
	And I said this about the people who had been funding these universities.
	Fine with what they were doing, as long as they were coming after white people, for example.
	And that was okay.
	Until they eventually come for the people that organize them, right?
	The Jacobins. And so you've got here, you've got the People's Tribunal.
	Being live-streamed, and they're calling for the president, the provost, the school board, and all the rest of these people who have been training them.
	They call for them to go to the guillotine.
	Here's a little sample of it.
	We won't play the full thing because it really is annoying.
	Can people find you? Guillotine!
	Guillotine! Guillotine!
	Guillotine! Guillotine!
	So there's the Palestinian flag, and guillotine, guillotine.
	Bring up the next person. This is amazing how juvenile these people are, These kids.
	Youthful idiots.
	Marxist idiots.
	Jacobin idiots.
	...on the charges of having a vested interest in the genocide of Palestinian people as they profit off of Zionist weapons and purchases that he refused to divest from apartheid as they lie in their pockets.
	The people find this...
	Yeah, you get the idea.
	I won't subject you to any more of that.
	But yeah, the mob coming after the people who have organized the mob.
	If the students hurt any of these people in any way, the university will be completely at fault, said one person who saw the stream and recorded it, Stu.
	You saw his information there on that.
	But no, actually, if the students hurt any of these people, these people will be completely at fault.
	The president, the provost, the board, the ones who were doing all this DEI, CRT, weaponizing this group for hatred, and then they just came after a group that they had not thought that they would hate, right?
	You're supposed to just hate the white people.
	The crowd shouts guilty, then guillotine, guillotine, guillotine.
	By the way, when you see it's all women, All women.
	Future Congress is right there.
	Future Congress with all women.
	What was it? John Knox, who wrote a time in English history where he had a couple of bloody Queen Marys and Queen Elizabeth, and he wrote something about the monstrous regiment of women.
	Talking about how he didn't want to be ruled by these women queens because they were maybe more ruthless even than the kings were.
	No, they're just too pathetic.
	The thing is, when I saw that, I thought, well, let's see what they do with a guillotine.
	All they did was shout, guillotine, guillotine, guillotine.
	They did not actually have the ability.
	They're just too pathetic to actually build a mock guillotine and do a mock execution, aren't they?
	I mean, that would take a little bit of skills.
	They don't have any skills.
	They don't know anything. They can't even build a fake guillotine into a fake execution.
	That's how pathetic they are.
	The crowd calls out for the President, Granberg as well, on the charges of using our tuition dollars to fund genocide and sell out students to Zionist interests.
	The people find you guilty.
	Guillotine, guillotine.
	So, there you go. And what is even more pathetic than that, It's the fact that that would scare conservatives into attacking the First Amendment with the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act and with other things.
	Every day it comes out, you've got another idea from Alan Dershowitz as to how he's going to punish the speech of idiots like that that he doesn't agree with.
	Isn't that pathetic?
	That we can easily be controlled through reactionary means like that to those Marxists?
	And, of course, that's how they're really being used, still being used, by the people who have run these institutions for so long.
	The president, the provost, the board of directors, and the Department of Education that has been funding all this.
	We want to run this stuff.
	We want to have these radicals out there so we can use them to get your consent to shut this down.
	In the same way that when you have all of the open borders...
	What is the big solution that we keep seeing over and over again from so many conservatives?
	Well, we just need to have an ID for everybody so that these people who sneak into our country can't participate in the economy, so they can't participate in voting and all the rest of the stuff.
	We don't want them voting, and I don't have any problem with having an ID for voting, but they want to make this about making mandatory approval from the federal government to get a job.
	That's what mandatory e-verify is.
	Another example, you know, scaring the parents about pornography.
	And you should be scared of pornography.
	I'm not saying that the open border is not a problem.
	It is a problem. They do create problems.
	These people are a problem. But they always want you to accept their solution.
	There's only one solution. And that means that you're going to have to give up some of your freedom.
	We've got artificial intelligence out there, and it's making fake stuff.
	So you're going to have to prove that you are real.
	We don't have to have the artificial intelligence identified, so...
	No, you will have to do it.
	We've got porn sites that kids can go to.
	So now everybody needs to have an ID in order to use the internet.
	All the rest of this stuff. So, one more clip I'll show you of these people on George Washington University campus.
	Here they are doing their daily flag ceremony.
	Oh wait, that's not the American flag.
	Allahu Akbar! Yeah, that's right.
	And we've got Trader...
	Machiavelli and Mike giving $3.5 billion, not to protect our border, but to bring more people like that to the United States.
	People who hate this country.
	Well, I said we had one more, but actually there's still one more video I want to show you.
	This is at a different university.
	This is a Case Western Reserve campus in Cleveland.
	And these are some protesters who have sprayed graffiti all over a wall where they are standing still.
	Still standing, I should say.
	Well, they're standing still as well.
	They're not moving. But they are standing in front of their wall that has graffiti on it.
	And the university has called for some contractors to come and paint over it.
	And these painted protesters refused to move.
	And so the guy is doing his work.
	He says, I need to move or you're going to get sprayed.
	Well, they decide they're going to stay there.
	And so he's got a job to do.
	And he just sprays right over them.
	This person puts a shield on.
	They still got all their protective masks and face shields and everything left over from COVID. Wasn't that convenient?
	We had all that stuff with COVID. And so he's just painting over them right now.
	He's going to paint over the next person in line.
	It says, students assaulted by contractors.
	No, they're not being assaulted by contractors.
	They've made the conscious choice to get in the way.
	He says, you know, move.
	I'm going to paint this.
	If you decide that you're going to refuse to move, well, then you decide that you want to get painted.
	It's just that simple. One person said, we knew heroes didn't all wear capes.
	We weren't aware that some of them carried spray guns.
	Whoever makes this paint or this primer should add a new feature to the can.
	This covers stains, fading, water damage, and whiny dweebs in just a single coat.
	That's the cops saying, we're just here.
	We're just here. There's no assault here.
	You know, you've chosen to stand there and try to cover the wall with your body so you'll get your body covered with paint.
	And I think this is an appropriate response to these spoiled brats.
	You know, not attacks on free speech.
	Just paint them, you know.
	Paint over them, take them off or whatever.
	Because... So much of what they're doing is not speech.
	When they start blocking people from going into classes, when they vandalize property or whatever, we're not talking about free speech.
	So why would Mike Johnson and Mark Levin and people of that ilk, why would they come after our free speech?
	As a matter of fact, why would a foreign government like Israel do that to us?
	Our friend, our best friend in the world, Israel, wants to take away our First Amendment.
	What does that tell you?
	These attacks on free speech in order to pander to a foreign government.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and take a look at an update to the pandemic and pharmaceutical news as well.
	So I want all those people watching me at Vimeo to take me down.
	I've got a segment coming up just for you.
	So stay with us. We'll be right back to offend you.
	But unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression...
	In our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
	It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.
	The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
	Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	I'm going to be a hero.
	It's your move.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, we have Pfizer stock got hit after a boy dies of cardiac arrest during a gene therapy trial.
	I was really surprised by this.
	Not that Pfizer would kill somebody, but that they would actually do a test and then admit that somebody died.
	That, I guess, is the unusual thing about all this.
	Just like it was very interesting and surprising that AstraZeneca admitted that people were dying from their jab and took it off the market.
	The same people that I was talking a week ago.
	And I got my video taken off the market, so to speak, by Vimeo.
	After young men receiving experimental gene therapy for a form of muscular dystrophy died during this trial, according to Stat News.
	Stat News, by the way, is a pharmaceutical publication.
	And they seem to be pretty objective, actually.
	I've seen some interesting things come out of Stat News.
	First of all, they're talking about this trial where someone died.
	But they were also the source for that information about how Pfizer was blackmailing Brazil and Argentina and a third unnamed South American country that wanted to be anonymous because they eventually succumbed to the blackmail of Pfizer.
	The fact that this was a global agenda, that nobody's going to go in or out of your country, allowed this multinational corporation Pfizer To blackmail governments and to say, you're going to hold us harmless not only for the design of our vaccine, but even for any negligence that we have in terms of manufacturing or shipping or whatever.
	Nothing that we do will we be held responsible or liable for.
	And you'll protect us and you'll even protect us with assets outside of your country.
	And so that was picked up by Stat News.
	Again, a pharmaceutical trade publication, and it was reported in a lot of places outside of the United States.
	Where I saw it picked up was when it was echoed by some Indian press.
	But anyway, Stat News says Pfizer has confirmed the boy suffered cardiac arrest, and they are pausing, crossing over patients in its randomized phase 3 trial of the treatment.
	So I wasn't surprised that they killed somebody with their genetic treatments.
	I was just surprised that they were still doing tests because now the FDA is so totally captured it just rubber stamps everything they want to do anymore.
	I said it's notable that we had the first time A person was publicly identified as having died during a clinical trial for gene therapy was back in 1999.
	Jesse Gelsinger.
	And it caused the FDA to shutter human genetic research at Penn's Institute for Gene Therapy.
	Well, that was then.
	However, this is now.
	And they won't do anything about it, but the stock market will react to it.
	Perhaps the people in the stock market thought that the FDA might actually regulate them.
	Not going to happen. I mean, this is not like, you know, building jets that fall apart or crash and kill people.
	If you're doing that with a vaccine, that's just fine.
	We'll just move along.
	One of the things that I thought was really interesting out of Children's Health Defense was an article talking in detail about how pediatricians are paid to vaccinate children.
	And the thing that I thought was most interesting about this was, you know, you look at this and the guy said, well, we get kickbacks of up to $240 per visit.
	Well, I don't know how much the vaccines are, but the kickbacks, the incentives, as well as the disincentives, the punishments for not getting kids vaccinated, a lot of those are running through the insurance company.
	And I didn't realize that.
	He said, this is Dr.
	Paul Thomas, a Dartmouth-trained pediatrician.
	And the question is, asked by the defender of Children's Health Defense, that's what they call a publication.
	They said, can pediatricians afford to even run their medical practices without the kickbacks that they get for vaccinating every child?
	Well, Dr. Paul Thomas said you can't stay in business if you're not giving pretty close to the CDC's vaccination schedule.
	He ran a general pediatric practice.
	He had 15,000 patients, and he had 33 staff members.
	And so he knows what he's talking about.
	He actually wrote a book, The Vaccine Friendly Plan, Dr.
	Paul's Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health from Pregnancy Through Your Child's Teen Year.
	And he gave this to parents in his practice and he said he gave them a choice He said they could vaccinate their children on the CDC schedule They could vaccinate them more slowly not giving them a bunch of a cluster of vaccines all at once to challenge their immune system But you know stage it out do it when their immune system You know when their body is a little bit more mature the immune system is a little bit more mature And they started vaccinating newborn babies who don't even
	have an immune system that could respond to that if you Agree with the their theory of vaccines Which I don't But he said, so he gave them a choice.
	You can use the CDC schedule and give them all the vaccines at the time the CDC says, or you can do it more slowly, waiting for the child's immune system to develop, or you cannot vaccinate at all if you don't want to do it at my practice, he said.
	But then when he found out, Was it more and more patients decided that they didn't want the vaccines when it wasn't being pushed on them by a pediatrician?
	We had that done with us, with our kids.
	Fortunately, we didn't get our kids vaccinated until they were much older.
	We didn't take them to the doctor unless they were sick.
	And then when one of them got sick, we took both of them in, and the doctor just had a fit that we weren't on fluoridated water.
	So we're not going to do that, because I knew better than that.
	I'd grown up not being on fluoride.
	So I knew about fluoride. I didn't, at the time, know about the vaccine stuff, and they were, I guess, about four or five years old.
	You know, one of them was four, the other one was five.
	They're eight months apart.
	So the...
	Anyway, he had a fit that they weren't vaccinated, and so he did some vaccines.
	And Travis has always had reactions to the vaccines.
	It got worse.
	You know, we did them again when we traveled, and that was really bad.
	I had a really bad reaction to it then.
	And I think it's manifested itself now with some autoimmune disease that he's suffering with.
	But anyway, they gave parents the option to not do that.
	And since some of them were not doing it, he said as they started refusing vaccines, he said starting to have a big financial impact on his practice.
	He and his staff conducted a thorough analysis of their billing records to examine the income generated from vaccine administration fees, markups, and quality bonuses.
	This is from the insurance companies, the quality bonus.
	Tied to vaccination rates.
	He said we were losing over a million dollars in vaccines that were refused.
	Isn't that amazing? Again, he had 15,000 patients.
	He said it's very expensive to run a pediatric office.
	You need multiple nurses.
	He had 33 staff.
	Multiple nurses. Multiple receptionists.
	Multiple billing people, medical records.
	It's a huge operation.
	And of course, a big part of the expense is trying to keep up with the insurance companies, dragging their feet, trying to get them to pay you and all the rest of that stuff.
	That's why I've seen, we found a couple of physicians that will not handle insurance at all.
	They operate on a cash basis.
	And they don't, and when you look at what this guy says the insurance companies are doing about the vaccination stuff, you may want to look to find a physician who operates We're good to go.
	He said pediatricians receive several types of financial incentives for administering the vaccines.
	He said the first one, of course, is an administrative fee.
	He said that is a thank you for giving the shot.
	He said physicians typically receive about $40 for the first vaccine they give and then $20 for each subsequent antigen.
	He said, let's just say a two-month well-baby visit.
	There is a DPT. He says, that's three shots, three antigens.
	And then we give him some other things, Hep B, Prevnar, Polio, Rhoda.
	He says, that's about $240.
	The second way that pediatrician profits is through a small markup on the cost of the vaccines themselves.
	But he said, that's minuscule.
	Then the third and most substantial financial incentive is one that I'd never Knew about and that is what they call a quality bonus. It's tied to vaccination rates on a per physician basis the insurance companies offer pediatricians bonus payments for meeting certain benchmarks Typically about 80% of patients being fully vaccinated by age 2
	So this is a push coming from the insurance companies and so when I saw that I thought ah That makes sense. That's one of the reasons why that executive from the big insurance company won America that was in Indiana That's why he said, you know, we've believe.
	We've got, as he's explaining to his publicly traded company, he's got to explain it to the investors.
	Yeah, we've had a rough time here because we've had more insurance claims in the third and fourth quarter of 2021 when the vaccines rolled out.
	We've had more insurance claims in that amount of time than we would ever expect statistically.
	This is more than three standard deviations away from the mean.
	And he said, this is not something that you expect at all.
	It's unprecedented. And he goes, and these are people that are not dying from COVID. And so he goes on to say, though, he says, however, we know they have to be dying from COVID. And we further know that anybody that's vaccinated is not going to die from COVID. Therefore, these are unvaccinated people who are dying from COVID. And we're going to charge unvaccinated people more.
	Now, somehow, the pharmaceutical industry and the government has got its hooks into these insurance companies.
	Because they are telling these pediatricians, you get 80% of your patients fully vaccinated by age 2, and we'll give you a quality bonus, and that's a big dollar contribution to them.
	So the insurance companies are in on this scam.
	They're in on a payoff to kill people.
	With his practices, vaccination rate only at 1%, not 80%.
	He was giving people a choice.
	He wasn't pushing it to them. Only had 1% of the people getting vaccinated instead of the 80%.
	He said he was at risk of losing up to 15% of his overall revenue.
	And anybody who's been in business knows that if you lose 15% of your revenue, it's going to be pretty hard to even stay in business.
	You lose 25-30%.
	That's what I was saying when they did the lockdowns.
	They said, all right, well, we'll let you open up, you know, a little bit, you know, one day a week or something like that.
	It's like, that's not going to do it for anybody.
	He said, really, it effectively means that a pediatric practice cannot survive using insurance without doing most of the vaccines, if not all of them, said the doctor.
	I think that explains the blinders.
	This is why doctors just won't go there.
	Why doctors won't look at the fact that these vaccines are causing a lot of harm.
	The money. The love of money.
	The root of all evil. Follow the money, Jerry.
	Yeah, that's what this is really about.
	And then the interviewer with Children's Health Defense asked him about sudden infant death syndrome.
	And before I play that for you, I just want to play again that clip.
	Because, you know, they started talking about sudden adult death syndrome with these vaccines.
	And this is a mother who, when they started talking about SADS, it clicked as to why her baby died with sudden infant death syndrome.
	You know, because something that's been going on for I've been saying this for over 40 years.
	I don't understand this. He was just at the doctors two weeks before.
	He got his shots. He had the perfect health.
	Everything was great.
	And then last night...
	I watched... Have you ever watched Mrs.
	G, the medical examiner?
	I can't say it now.
	Anyway, I watched her show, and she says, what's at rise right now is the sudden adult syndrome.
	Same thing as SIDS, but it's for adults.
	What happened lately that was forced upon people that they had to have...
	And all of a sudden, the rise of these adults dying for no reason is happening.
	And then it dawned on me that I poisoned my kid two weeks before with a vaccine that I was told was safe.
	What if that's the cause of death syndrome and they've been lying to us all this time and they've been experimenting on our babies since 1984 and before and it's just come to light because we get more education now.
	We can get reached education.
	We're not just told whatever they want us to tell.
	We can look research online.
	What if that's the cause of SIDS? What if Me doing what I thought was good killed my baby.
	And it's just hitting me right now because I never put two to two together until now.
	Tell me what you guys think.
	Do you think I'm kind of off my rocker?
	No, she's not off her rocker.
	Unfortunately, as this doctor pointed out, Got to get 80% of those kids 100% vaccinated, or you're going to lose about 15% of your practice's revenue.
	This is why the doctors don't want to look at it.
	But when they asked him about SIDS, he says, when you hear the word syndrome, as in sudden infant death syndrome, when you hear the word syndrome, it means we don't know what it is or what causes it.
	But we actually have a pretty good clue.
	He said six studies examined the correlation between SIDS cases and vaccines.
	And one data set 97% were in the first 10 days after the vaccine.
	Just like her son.
	Only 3% were in the subsequent 10 days.
	That is amazing.
	When you've got a 97% correlation with something, it looks like a cause to me.
	Other studies showed similar patterns, with 75 to 90% of SIDS deaths occurring within the first week after vaccination.
	He also highlighted the increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, allergies, autoimmune diseases, and vaccinated kids.
	But again, it's the insurance companies bribing the doctors to vaccinate all the kids.
	He said, we know without a doubt that things like neurodevelopmental concerns, learning disabilities, ADD, ADHD, autism, these are clearly linked to vaccines.
	He said, the more you vaccinate, the more likely you are to have these problems.
	The Amish don't vaccinate.
	The Amish don't have autism.
	Vaccinated children are more prone to infections and illness compared to their unvaccinated peers.
	It's the vaccinated who get more ear infections, more sinus infections, more lung infections.
	Any kind of infection you look at, the vaccinated get more.
	Why? Well, their immune system has been attacked.
	The risks associated with vaccines extend beyond childhood, he said.
	We have the sudden adult death syndrome now because of the COVID vaccine rollout.
	He said, we see it on the news, we see it in the ball fields, we see healthy adults, boom, dropping dead.
	And that has all happened since the Trump shots.
	He says COVID jabs.
	They're Trump shots. Trump wants the credit.
	Give him the credit. He pointed out that despite decades of research, mRNA vaccines have never been proven safe or effective.
	He cited previous attempts to develop mRNA vaccines for RSV, which consistently failed in animal trials.
	And we've talked about this before.
	When they did the animal trials for mRNA versions of an RSV, he said they would vaccinate the rats, and then when they re-exposed those rats in one study, 100% of them died.
	He also shared a personal story about his mother's experiences with pulmonary fibrosis after receiving three COVID vaccines.
	After her third COVID shot, she started really running out of energy and then getting short of breath.
	Within a month, her lungs had the appearance of ground glass.
	And so he was also asked about the risk of vaccine shedding.
	He said, And it's been documented in studies.
	He said vaccinated individuals can expose others to spike proteins through body fluids and secretions.
	He said, we can no longer go to our doctor and just say, fix me.
	You know, that was my cardiologist.
	I said, well, I need to know more about this.
	And I think this other thing over here, there's some issues with it.
	Oh, you've been talking to Dr.
	Google? And I just said, yeah, but in my mind, what I said, well, one of us needs to understand and care about what's going on.
	If you don't care to do the research, I need to do the research.
	I should have said it to his face, but I just, yeah, you know, and I never went back.
	Anyway, Pfizer alone made over $100 billion, he said, with this.
	So the power that the public health machinery...
	Got to themselves with COVID has to be intoxicating to them.
	I can no longer trust the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, he said.
	This is the doctor. Some good people work in these institutions, but these institutions themselves have been captured.
	He said when it comes to vaccines or when it comes to new pandemic illnesses, they are the last people you want to trust.
	And so when we look at cancer mortality, again, after the third vaccine doses, we said his mom had the pulmonary fibrosis.
	Her lungs looked like ground glass.
	All these health effects Go up exponentially with each successive dose.
	A new study out of Japan found a significant increase in cancer deaths after taking a third Trump shot.
	Once we got to the third Trump shot, cancers started to go up, said Dr.
	Peter McCullough. Again, nobody calls him a Trump shot except for me and Donald Trump.
	That's one thing that we have in common.
	Trump and I want you to know that these are the Trump shots.
	Nobody else wants to talk about them being Trump's shots.
	Dr. Peter McCullough said it's very disturbing and the Japanese data has shown that the mRNA vaccine could cause cancer through multiple mechanisms.
	As we sit here today, all the evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccines actually cause cancer, he said.
	Every cancer registry in the world is up right now.
	As I've said many times, Trump shots are We're the shots sent around the world.
	He is guilty of crimes against humanity for funding this, for protecting it, for propagandizing for them.
	He is just as guilty as Pfizer, Moderna, and these other companies.
	He says there's roughly 4,000 papers showing vaccine complications and deaths.
	What we're seeing is just the tip of the iceberg.
	This is a giant human experiment that Oh, I got the FDA so mad at me, I just told them, run, do this.
	We don't have time to wait for this stuff.
	Yeah. Warp speed was a giant human experiment.
	We can't possibly know what is going to happen because things were not properly researched ahead of time.
	In Japan, 86.5% of the people took a third COVID jab compared to only 15% of the people here in the United States.
	Well, I hope we've had some effect.
	Now, even though Vimeo and YouTube and people of that ilk will kick off the program, I hope that you will push this out.
	I hope that you will use this information to tell other people, tell family members.
	We need to get this information out.
	People are dying because of the lies and the disinformation.
	That's one thing they're right about.
	What they don't say.
	Is that they are the ones giving us the disinformation, the malinformation that is out there.
	The majority of people are vaccine hesitant, says Daily Skeptic.
	And this is looking at France.
	They said it's kind of interesting that 15% of the survey respondents strongly agreed with view that in the event of a new epidemic, mRNA vaccines will be useful.
	Only 15%. 31% agreed.
	35% don't know.
	10% disagreeing.
	So you've got 46% of the people agreeing with it or strongly agreeing with it.
	You've got 35% that don't know.
	And then you've got 19% who disagree or strongly disagree.
	We've got to get those numbers up.
	These people really don't understand what is happening with this and the dire consequences of it.
	On Rockfan, thank you very much.
	Fran Edwards, thank you.
	And also on Rockfan, Karen Carpenter says, My mom has never been the same since one COVID. Legs went.
	She was doing great before.
	Got one COVID shot is what she's saying there.
	I'm so sorry to hear that.
	Again, the best thing that we can do is to make sure that they don't fool us again.
	In this particular study in France, they said 62% of the people agreed with the statement, there's a lot we don't know about the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines.
	Among those respondents, the 63% of the people said, there's a lot we don't know.
	Of course, you knew nothing at all about them before, right?
	Except what we did know It was extremely frightening.
	This is going to reprogram your body and it's, you know, going to then replicate itself and on and on.
	It's like, well, when does the replication stop and when does it stop hijacking my cells and reproducing itself?
	It sounds like the way they describe cancer or a virus or something like that.
	How does that stop? Well, it turns out it doesn't seem to be stopping.
	Among these respondents that said that there's still a lot we don't know about mRNA, 15% were unvaccinated, 50% had doubts despite being vaccinated, 35% were vaccinated and comfortable with it.
	See, that's the other aspect.
	A lot of people... Really regret having had the vaccine.
	One person that we know through my brother-in-law, Keith, you know, and I've heard a lot of people say this, as soon as I got it, I could feel something happening, and, you know, she's now struggling with cancer.
	She said, I immediately regretted it.
	I wouldn't take the second one.
	We have to head this thing off.
	Before they pull any of this stuff again.
	It's one of the reasons why I really think it's important for people to think about the lies and the propaganda and the fear that is being pushed out there about this bird flu stuff.
	Because what they want to do is they want to put the, you know, they have burned themselves badly on this thing, as you can see from these surveys.
	So they're going to come at us from a different way.
	What's this way going to be?
	They're going to vaccinate our food.
	And they're going to use the threat of bird flu to kill vast amounts of cattle and chicken.
	And all of this is to attack our food, to ban indirectly meat and dairy, to push us towards our lab meat and all the rest of the stuff.
	But the other thing that we should be concerned about is them vaccinating our food.
	We've got to push back against this.
	And I think the most effective thing that could be done...
	is to try to get state legislators to push back against the USDA and even against these state departments of agriculture.
	It was a state department of agriculture up in Pennsylvania that went after Amos Miller.
	It wasn't even the USDA. It was Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.
	And so we need to get them in line And we need to get them to back off from people who are raising their own food and not require them to vaccinate, not require them to send them to a central processing factory because that central processing factory is going to require vaccinations.
	That's what the USDA is doing right now.
	We're going to track and vax all of the cattle.
	And if you don't have all your, you know, we're going to put an RFID tag on all the animals, and you're going to have to send them to our centrally controlled processing factories.
	And if they come in and there's something that we don't like about their travel history or their vaccination history, we're not going to process the animals.
	We'll just kill them and bury them or something, you know, just like we'll put the CO2 in the ground or something like that.
	And so 78% of these respondents...
	Supportive vaccination overall and trusted science and doctors similar to the general population.
	However, they've lost their confidence in government and health agencies and pharmaceutical industry.
	This group representing nearly two-thirds of the French population displayed skepticism toward political and economic influences on science during the pandemic and this is one of the reasons why we have to Get people to understand how you know, the money is being used to influence all this stuff Trump bribed the governor's the governor's then bribed the Local public health things you've got the insurance
	companies bribing pediatricians to vaccinate the kids you had Trump and Biden bribing the hospitals to put people on ventilators and remdesivir and then Threatening them blackmailing them that if you take if you don't have your nurses vaccinated and your doctors vaccinated at the hospital We're gonna take away all that money that we were giving you as bonuses Let's talk, in a little bit of time we've got here, the 11 Republican heroes who stood up against the swamp.
	This is the title from Breitbart.
	Only 11 Republicans, including Marjorie Taylor Greene, supported her in this resolution to remove Machiavellian Mike Johnson.
	And their names are Andy Biggs from Arizona, Eric Burlinson of Missouri, Eli Crane, Arizona, Warren Davidson, Ohio, Paul Gozar, Arizona, Arizona, good.
	Thomas Massey, Kentucky, Alex Mooney, West Virginia, Barry Moore, Alabama, Chip Roy, Texas, Victoria Sparks, Indiana, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, Georgia.
	These are the Republicans who voted against tabling the motion, in other words, setting aside this motion To have Machiavellian Mike vacate.
	So he had 11 of the GOP, only 32 Democrats to oust Machiavellian Mike.
	And interesting, you know, it's always about the money, isn't it?
	The guy gets $20 million in three months.
	His first full quarter as a Speaker of the House.
	He calls himself a wartime Speaker.
	He broke the Hastert rule, going against the majority of his own party, working with the opposition party to get his agenda through.
	And so then we see these kinds of headlines coming from Breitbart, for example.
	The swamp always wins.
	Mike Johnson expects to lead the House Republicans even after the election.
	And, of course, you know, they call him controlled opposition, and it's not just Breitbart.
	It's many of all the conservative publications call him controlled opposition.
	The swamp is winning.
	The Democrats are supporting him.
	He's working with the Democrats.
	He's part of the Uni Party.
	These are the headlines that I see everywhere.
	And then there's this headline.
	Trump rebukes Marjorie Taylor Greene for trying to throw him out.
	Now, wait a minute. Is Trump part of the swamp?
	Is Trump part of the Union Party?
	You better believe he is.
	You better understand that he is.
	Trump is a Democrat rhino, just like Machiavelli and Mike Johnson.
	If Trump had called for him to be removed, you better believe that all the GOP would have voted against him, and they would have removed him.
	Nobody's going to go against Trump, because the GOP is no longer about principle.
	It's a cult of personality around Donald Trump.
	The GOP has become greed outside of principle.
	That's what it stands for now.
	It's all about the money.
	It's all about following Trump and doing whatever he wants.
	And he wanted Mike Johnson there.
	Why do you think he wanted him there?
	Is it going to help him politically?
	Or is it something that the CIA masters of these two guys...
	And look, both of them.
	He's the wartime speaker...
	Donald Trump, you know, he puts in Gina Haspel, who is working hand in glove with the arch enemies of Trump, Brennan and Clapper, all these people.
	Do you understand how this is professional wrestling and how the people who are really running the speaker, the people who are running Trump and the two of them defending each other, you understand that this is a control game here?
	I hope you do. But if you don't, at least get the stuff about the vaccines out.
	Thank you for joining us. Let me tell you.
	The David Knight Show.
	You can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah. Good job.
	And you want to know something else?

▲