Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 18, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:30

The David Knight Show - 04/18/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 18th of April, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to talk about the reauthorization of Pfizer, but of course it is more than a reauthorization.
	It is a massive expansion.
	They're pushing for it to take place by tomorrow, and then they're going to ship this.
	That's in the Senate, of course.
	The House has already approved it.
	So we're going to take a look at that.
	We're also going to take a look at the back-and-forth About what was really happening in 2020.
	Was it really just about the lab?
	Is that what it truly is?
	Because that's what I keep seeing featured from Rand Paul.
	And I gotta say, if he's not going to talk about the hospital death protocols, if he's not going to talk about the jab, then talking about the Wuhan lab is merely a distraction.
	Folks, we know that the excess deaths and cancers and everything began not in 2020, but in 2021 and escalating thereafter.
	We'll be right back. As a matter of fact, yesterday I was going through the news.
	I always look at Breitbart and the thing that was getting the most number of comments, and it was a lot of comments.
	It's been a long time since I've seen this many comments on Breitbart.
	14,000 comments in defense of Trump because this silly trial that is going on.
	And again, he deserves to be in jail for the rest of his life.
	I made that clear because he's a mass murderer.
	And this is what we're talking about here.
	The mother of the COVID hospital protocol victim, he drove there and left in a body bag.
	What people are concerned about is that Trump can't go to his son's high school graduation.
	Aww. Aww.
	What a shame. Well, my daughter had her high school graduation canceled because of his lockdown.
	But we've got a lot of people, as I said when I covered this initially, and it made me angry because I just see this traction getting more, this story getting more and more traction, more and more sympathy for him.
	But no sympathy for the people whose children died suddenly from a heart attack, from his shot that he pushed.
	You know, there's only two people that I know of that call it the Trump shot.
	Me and Donald Trump.
	Isn't that interesting? The left doesn't want to call it the Trump shot because they like it and they don't want to give him credit for anything that they like.
	The right knows that it is poison and they don't want to associate it with the guy who actually did it.
	He's right about that.
	He's responsible for it.
	He's the one who ran the whole thing.
	He's the one who funded it.
	Give him the credit that he demands, that he gives himself all the time.
	They keep saying, stop talking about it.
	People are going to, you're identifying yourself with mass murder.
	And he is, and he doesn't care.
	So there are two people that call it the Trump shot, or Donald Trump and me.
	We agree on something, don't we?
	How about that? Yeah, I agree on a key issue with him.
	Who's responsible for this mass murder?
	The mother of a COVID hospital protocol victim says he drove there and then left in a body bag.
	Yeah, the real pandemic, folks, was the hospital protocol for murder that he paid for, that he rewarded.
	And just conservatives ought to just freak out about how much money he gave to the hospitals, first of all.
	How in the world do you embrace that as a conservative?
	They point the finger at somebody and say they got COVID. They may not be sick.
	They don't have a PCR test, they said.
	But you point a finger at him, $13,000.
	You put him on one of his ventilators, $39,000.
	And then they give, once you point the finger at them, so they got COVID, you get $13,000 plus a 20% bonus on all the charges that you have there.
	So you can get the $39,000 for putting them on a ventilator until you kill them in a few days, which is what they did with this guy.
	This guy and remdesivir, of course, as well.
	After you kill them, or before you kill them, You can get a 20% bonus on everything.
	Why are conservatives okay with that?
	Why are conservatives okay with him handing tens of billions of dollars worth of subsidies over to these big pharmaceutical companies that have no liability?
	Why is that okay? Well, here's the sad story of one man.
	Because tens of millions of people dying is a statistic.
	One person is a tragedy.
	And this is a bigger tragedy than missing a high school graduation.
	For all the people on Breitbart.
	For all the MAGA club out there.
	In December 2020, life was going well for 40-year-old William Judah.
	He was vice president of a family-owned janitorial company.
	Father of a 5-year-old, stepfather of two other children, and a softball coach.
	His mother said she was supposed to see him right after Christmas 2020.
	But the plans were canceled when he tested positive for COVID-19.
	And then he began experiencing symptoms such as loss of smell and taste.
	She said, I would have dropped everything and run up there.
	But he said, no, there's nothing you can do.
	In the coming days, his symptoms worsened.
	So he told her he was going to drive himself to the Prattville, Alabama Baptist Hospital.
	He was going to the hospital to get some antibiotics.
	By January the 8th, he was dead.
	So from the 20th to the 8th.
	Maybe about two and a half weeks.
	His mother said the COVID hospital protocols.
	Which included the administration of remdesivir over five days.
	HCQ and zinc? No.
	Ivermectin? No. As a matter of fact, she got sick.
	She and her husband. Her husband's 77 years old.
	They took ivermectin and they got fined.
	One of my best friends got a very severe flu.
	Nobody else in his family got it, but he got it very, very severe.
	He's going into pneumonia. He took ivermectin and stopped it.
	But what they did was they took people, you know, flu kills a lot of people every year.
	I'm not saying this wasn't a different flu.
	I'm just saying it was a hospital protocol.
	And it was things like remdesivir and the ventilators.
	And the denial of care, of appropriate care.
	And the denial of something that we discovered that works very well against these respiratory diseases.
	You had pneumatologists, I think it is, respiratory doctors.
	I've said, I looked and said, putting people who have pneumonia, put them on a ventilator?
	We've never done that before. What's that about?
	Intubate them, that type of thing?
	Of course, that's going to kill them. Anyway, she told him that in her region of Florida, monoclonal antibodies were being administered for patients.
	He told her that nurses at his hospital told him they were administering, quote, what they gave President Trump.
	There you go. Did they really give that to Trump?
	Did he really take it? Or was he pushing remdesivir for Fauci?
	The hospital isolated him, prohibited his family from visiting.
	We see this over and over again. Those are the key things.
	You're not allowed to know what they're doing.
	This was deliberate murder, paid for by the Trump administration.
	You'd be furious if this was done by Hillary Clinton.
	You'd be furious if it was done by Biden or by Obama.
	But it's okay when it's done by Trump, isn't it?
	I'd spoken to him, and they were also giving him Toradol for pain.
	He was in a lot of pain. They said that he kept pulling the mask off so they had the oxygen on too hard.
	Now, think about this.
	They put this guy in there. They're denying him any effective treatment.
	They're giving him remdesivir, which kills your liver.
	And I'd done this over and over again.
	They knew this very well.
	Fauci had tried to push this for his pals at Gilead Pharmaceutical.
	This was his third time, and they were about to run out of their copyright, their patent that they had on it.
	He had offered it up for AIDS. Everybody said, no, it doesn't do anything, but it does destroy the liver, so we're not going to approve it.
	No effectiveness, and certainly not safe.
	Then he tried it again with Ebola.
	Same story. Doesn't do anything.
	Then he tried again for this.
	And there was a WHO study that was done in China that went up saying it doesn't do anything, but it does kill the liver.
	And that got taken down that same day.
	And within a week, Fauci put up his non-peer-reviewed study and pronounced it the standard of care.
	And he changed the standard of approval.
	Because always in the past with a therapeutic, which is what remdesivir is, you have to show that it is effective.
	And his stuff showed the same thing that China did.
	It didn't make any difference whether you took remdesivir or not.
	But he said the people recovered got better 30% faster.
	So that's the standard of care, right?
	And they went with it.
	Now, isn't it interesting that Rand Paul, who has hung out on the Wuhan lab, doesn't want to talk about the jabs.
	As a matter of fact, one of his criticisms of Dr.
	Fauci, you're going to make people vaccine hesitant.
	Don't do that, right?
	Rand Paul is a doctor.
	He should be, he should understand what's going on.
	He should be honest with people.
	He should understand what's going on with these flu shots and the rest of the stuff and the COVID, but he never criticized the jab.
	He's a better friend to the pharmaceutical companies in that regard than even Fauci, because Fauci is pushing a dangerous untested jab.
	Then even Paul Offit, one of the biggest cheerleaders for vaccines, always said, well, if we push this thing out too fast, this may cause vaccine hesitancy.
	So Paul Offit and Rand Paul on the same side, worrying about creating vaccine hesitancy, which they have created vaccine hesitancy, and are trying to defend the vaccine industry.
	But both Rand Paul and Fauci, on the side of Gilead Pharmaceutical and Remdesivir, Rand Paul had his wife buy shares of Remdesivir.
	Before Fauci approved it.
	So, you know, there you go. He doesn't want to talk about Remdesivir.
	He doesn't want to talk about the jab.
	He doesn't want to talk about, you know, President Trump's lockdowns.
	None of that. Let's go to the lab.
	I want to attack Fauci because conservatives don't like Fauci.
	That's why Rand Paul is doing this.
	He doesn't have any principles anymore, folks.
	He's sold out.
	Just like Mike Johnson.
	These guys have sold out.
	They've sold us out.
	He's got no principles.
	So he's going to talk about the Wuhan lab.
	Seriously. And he gets featured everywhere, right?
	Everybody's featuring him.
	Pinned all day yesterday at the top of Zero Edge.
	This is what got me upset.
	So let's talk about this tragedy here.
	Hospital isolated him, prohibited his family from visiting him.
	He's trying to get the mask off so he can breathe.
	So they ramp up the oxygen, keep putting the mask back on him.
	Now, what's the difference between what was done to this 40-year-old man And George Washington, for example.
	We talk about George Washington's death.
	He was quite a bit older than 40, but he wasn't all that old, and he's out riding his horse around his plantation, and he gets a cold.
	And it starts to get worse, and they have the doctor come in.
	What's the doctor do? He gives him mercury.
	He puts leeches on him and removes most of the blood in his body.
	And we look at this and he goes, well, you know, he died with a cold, but he died from the leeches and the mercury.
	This guy died from the masks, the remdesivir, the ventilators, all that stuff that they did to him.
	Not from any COVID or anything.
	The hospital protocols.
	And we're going to look back at this stuff, folks, because it's not going away.
	It's not going away, and...
	The people who have pushed back against it, like me, from the very beginning, will be vindicated.
	The truth will be vindicated.
	People will regard Fauci and Rand Paul and Donald Trump and the rest of these murderers for their political expediency, they will be regarded even worse than this doctor who killed George Washington.
	He did it out of ignorance.
	They did it out of calculated Machiavellian politics.
	And the love of money.
	According to his mother, a nurse told her son the oxygen was on too hard because he was trying to pull the mask off of his face.
	She was literally blaming him, said the mother.
	By January the 6th, he indicated that he wasn't getting any better and he might need to be moved.
	He's communicating with his family by text.
	Again, because the family is prohibited from actually seeing him.
	Or having anything. It's medical kidnapping.
	We've seen over and over again. It's one of the reasons why I talked to Marty Gottesville so much.
	You know, this pattern of medical kidnapping that you saw with a children's hospital associated with Harvard University.
	This type of kidnapping by the hospital, that's been done over and over again.
	And that's what was done on a massive scale.
	So we have the medical kidnapping.
	We have the hospital protocol of murder.
	By this point, he was diagnosed with pneumonia, but she learned that her son was not receiving appropriate treatment for pneumonia.
	Instead, they were giving him remdesivir.
	I said, are they giving you an antibiotic?
	He said, no, they're watching me for blood clots.
	Are they giving you a blood thinner?
	He said, no. They said there's something that might be wrong with my liver.
	Well, that something would have been remdesivir and they knew it as well. A lot of nurses were calling it run death is near You know the stuff that Rand Paul profited off of The next day they put him on a ventilator and he passed But when she tried to find out more information from the hospital Staff initially told her that they had taken him off fluids is all they said and I'll see you next time.
	And then she said that he coated twice, and they were able to bring him back.
	In other words, flat-lined or whatever.
	But the third time, they were busy with other patients and just couldn't bring him back.
	His mother said, they were just too busy.
	I guess I got some other people that can make money from him, right?
	When finally released, the death certificate said he died from COVID-19 and pneumonia and from renal failure.
	No, he died from remdesivir and he died from the ventilator and he died from their death protocols that the Trump administration paid them obscene amounts of money to administer.
	William was unvaccinated because in January 2021, COVID vaccines were not even being administered for his age group.
	She said, I'd had COVID twice.
	My husband's 70-70 had it twice.
	If anything, we'd be the ones to die, but we didn't go to the hospital, and we didn't take remdesivir.
	We took ivermectin, and we're fine.
	Now, again, all the people out there, I hear the Trump people, well, he talked about ivermectin.
	Yeah, he made a laughingstock out of it.
	What Trump did with ivermectin and HCQ? It was as damaging in many ways as the FDA tweeting out.
	It's horse medicine, y'all.
	Stop taking it. If Trump really wanted to do anything, he could at the very least have said, we're not going to allow people to be punished.
	You're not state governors.
	Here's what he would have done. He doesn't have any ability to directly order them.
	So what would he have done?
	He could have said, well, you know, we're giving you all this money for this emergency.
	I'm going to take that away if you prohibit ivermectin or HCQ. Because Trump has already admitted that he knows that strategy.
	Everybody knows that. Anybody that's been watching politics for more than a day knows what's going on with that.
	That's how the federal government gets around all the 10th Amendment prohibitions for direct orders.
	They bribe and they blackmail.
	Do this and I'll give you money.
	Here's money. Get you hooked on it.
	Keep doing what I want you to do or I'll take it away.
	You put the boys in the girls' bathroom, I'll take your money away.
	That type of thing. The governors know they can do that as well.
	DeSantis did that in Florida.
	If you force masks and vaccines on people, I'm going to take away your state funds.
	Trump said, I'm going to, if you mandate these colleges that mandate vaccines, he just said it, these colleges that mandate vaccines, I'm going to take away their money.
	Well, he didn't take away the money from the hospitals that were doing this kind of stuff, and he didn't take away money from the states that were punishing doctors and pharmacists for giving people ivermectin.
	As a matter of fact, he could have gone the other direction.
	He could have mass-produced ivermectin and HCQ, but he didn't do that either, did he?
	Yeah, he was getting the remdesivir and the ventilators and the things that would kill people out to them.
	And the tests, the COVID tests, many of them coming already preloaded as positive as we've already shown.
	So, it was a standard of care.
	Poor Trump. He can't go to his son's graduation.
	Yeah. Well, this father can't go to his children's graduation either.
	Because Trump killed him.
	Yeah. Yeah. He's going to get away with the murder, isn't he?
	And people are going to vote for him again, aren't they?
	The mother said the pain of losing her son drove her into action, so she joined online support groups that became activists for other victims of the hospital death protocols and the vaccines.
	She said with the COVID grief groups who were communicating, it was like they knew what I was talking about.
	They didn't argue with me and say, oh, it's just part of it.
	They would say, yeah, that happened to my husband too, or to my daughter too, or to my son too.
	That's how we came up with those 25 commonalities, she said.
	They've got a list of those. It was developed by the former Feds Group, Freedom Foundation.
	I've interviewed a person from that group several times.
	And they have produced a list of 25 commonalities.
	This isn't going away.
	People understand what's happened.
	And this massive censorship and disinformation campaign run by the government, run under the Trump administration, continuing under the Biden administration, that will be defeated with the truth.
	The 25 commonalities are just an eye-opener and have encouraged me to go out and educate other people, she said.
	I can't tell you how many local mothers who have lost sons have contacted me.
	Or even when their son was in the hospital, they would contact me and say, what was that drug that they gave your son?
	Yeah, that's the one they gave my son, too.
	Former Feds is also involved in a class action lawsuit against Gilead.
	You see, that's the real stuff.
	That's the real stuff.
	These people are former Feds.
	Rand Paul is now a current Fed.
	And I'm fed up with him.
	He's out there focusing on Wuhan.
	These people are focusing on Gilead that he invested in.
	What a traitor.
	FDA says no safety signals that link the white blood clots that you've seen in the autopsies where they pull these long, stringy, rubbery white things and the embalmers say, we've never seen anything like this.
	I've got to pull this stuff out so I can do the embalming.
	More than 70% of 269 embalmers surveyed found these fibrous white blood clots that didn't appear ever before.
	Didn't appear during COVID. They appeared after the Trump genetic code injection.
	Air Force Major Thomas Haviland conducted a 2023 survey of 269 embalmers across four major countries and three different continents.
	He also conducted a similar survey in late 2022 that revealed 66% of embalmers began finding the unusual clots in mid-2021.
	When they really put the pressure on everybody.
	You know, just like we saw from One America, the insurance company, saying, yeah, we had like a, this is like a once in 200 year event, you know, the number of excess deaths that we had in third and fourth quarter.
	I wonder why that happened.
	It suggests a temporal link to the rollout of the Trump shots.
	The white, stringy, rubbery clots.
	Also, a Thai neurologist discovered the same thing.
	He worked for the Red Cross and their science center there.
	He is a proponent of the vaccines.
	But he suggested that these clots might be connected to sudden death.
	And then he got fact-checked along with the Air Force major.
	AFP fact-checked him.
	He got intimidated by the media.
	And so the Thai Red Cross doctor caved on it.
	But the other guy didn't, you see.
	So the Thai doctor said he would avoid publicly discussing the white clots.
	He said, I've already shared all the information publicly that I found useful, and I still support the Trump shots.
	And I'm not part of any anti-vaccine group.
	Don't hit me with that label.
	I don't want to be called anti-vaxxer.
	Well, I do. I'm proud of it.
	I'm proud of it. I was anti-vaxxer before the Trump shots.
	And I'm really anti-vaxx now.
	Significantly increase, significant increases in cancer mortality, say the Japanese researchers, I mentioned this yesterday, I didn't give you the actual numbers of it, and the fact that they correlated it, especially with the third jab, the third jab of the Trump shot.
	And so they said increases in mortality from all causes in Japan indicated a 2.1% mortality increase in 2021.
	Not in 2020! And a 9.6% increase in 2022.
	Researchers found no significant excess mortality in 2020.
	How about that? But then they see mortality for some cancers increasing as much as 9.7%.
	A British doctor, Dal Gleish, renowned oncologist and professor at St.
	George's University of London, has warned about the potential risks of RNA-based vaccines since early in the pandemic.
	In 2022, he sent an urgent letter to the British Medical Journal.
	They're... The equivalent of the Journal of AMA here, JAMA, about leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and other cancers that he said were associated with the mRNA shot.
	He said there were melanoma patients that he had who were stable for years and then suddenly going into rapid relapse, typically within 3 to 12 months after vaccination.
	I shouted, I screamed, the canary in the coal mine!
	But I was told it was pure anecdotal.
	Nothing to see. Shut up.
	And by the way, you'll upset cancer patients.
	Well, Dalgleish said it's an adage now.
	The subsequent booster doses would become increasingly less effective until they disturb the immune system so much...
	That the disease you're trying to prevent was actually fueled by it.
	And so this was early research on mRNA.
	As a matter of fact, I remember reporting in the spring of 2021 what Dr.
	Ryan Cole, a pathologist, was saying in terms of, I'm looking at these people who have been vaccinated and have a significant reduction in killer T cells, which is your body's main defense against cancer, which is present in all of us to some degree or the other.
	He said, at that time, it's going to result in a lot more cancer and a lot more rapidly advancing cancer because these jabs are killing the killer T cells.
	So you can imagine after you get three of them, it's really taking down the number of your killer T cells.
	Dalgleish said he's been contacted by doctors from all over the place telling him we're seeing the same thing.
	But see, they come back and they say, well, there's no studies proving that, so it's simply anecdotal.
	Well, if you don't run a study, you're not going to find out, right?
	That's what the government will have done that for the longest time.
	For anything that's a natural ingredient or something, oh, we're not going to run any studies.
	And so, since we don't have any studies that prove this, it's only anecdotal what you're saying.
	And so, no studies?
	Well, no changes. These spike proteins and nanoparticles induce microclots, he said.
	And from my training, I remember specifically that prostate and pancreatic cancers are really associated with increased clotting.
	One of the major causes of mortality in patients with cancer It's cancer-associated thrombosis, blood clots.
	By the way, I'll talk about this just as we end here, but a lot of people have indicated to me some things that I could take because I said I was only prescribed a Pfizer drug which has a horrific safety profile.
	Not officially, just from the people who use it.
	And of course, they charge way more than anybody else charges.
	It's a relatively new drug, so the medical community pretends they don't know of any issues yet.
	But I've found an alternative, and I'll tell you about it coming up here.
	Because I have AFib, I'm also at risk for increased clotting.
	So it's something natural.
	I'll mention it here in a moment.
	But why cancer screening doesn't save lives?
	As a matter of fact, we're seeing several of these articles, and they're talking about specifically cancer screening for prostate cancer and other things like that.
	They said they did a very large study, and they found that there was no difference.
	The people that they caught it early and the people that they didn't, and the reason for that was basically what their protocol is for treating it.
	If they discover it early, their protocol might kill you.
	They found no difference between people who didn't do any PSA screening versus people who did it and then went to them for treatment.
	Probably the sweet spot would be to get the test.
	And if you find out that you've got to stay away from the medical community and do something on your own, they didn't evaluate anybody along those lines.
	But they did say that they found no improvement in the survival rate of people who didn't have advance notice and people who did.
	Because the people who had advance notice got all kinds of invasive treatment.
	Now, I mentioned earlier that the big increase in cancer came after three shots.
	Well, Alberta, Canada is now recommending boosters every three months.
	Every three months.
	That's four a year.
	I want to get rid of some people, I guess.
	And this is a place where Danielle Smith, who came out and pushed back against a lot of this so-called public health stuff, that's where she's premiered.
	Now, you know, there is this disconnect to some degree between the politicians and the public health things, but she could pull this in.
	And if your public health people are doing something that you don't want, you can do something about it.
	You know, they're putting out these recommendations.
	They're not mandating it, but this is what they're recommending.
	An mRNA booster every quarter, every three months, every year for the rest of your life.
	One person says, well, beginning with six-month-old babies, they're going to be pushing it on kids.
	One person said, well, that works out to about 320 doses of this for the average lifespan.
	Well, if you're constantly getting this stuff, you're not going to have an average lifespan.
	You'll have the lifespan, I guess, of the new normal.
	Just trust the experts.
	That's right. And, you know, when you look at this, is she excused by saying that she didn't mandate this?
	Is that an excuse? Well, I'm not mandating it.
	I'm just recommending it. Because that's the excuse always here for Donald Trump.
	Well, he didn't mandate it.
	He just recommended it.
	Told everybody how wonderful it was.
	Well, in Africa, they have been the brunt of a lot of these experiments from the drug companies.
	And now, a lot of African nations are recalling a Johnson& Johnson children's drug, a cough syrup that is there, a Benilin Pediatric, a children's cough syrup that's made by Johnson& Johnson.
	And, of course, it is not so...
	You know, Johnson& Johnson has, you know, their talcum baby powder.
	You know, it became known that this was causing respiratory disease in mothers and children.
	They kept doing it.
	Didn't care. Opioids, same thing.
	Jabs, same thing.
	You know, Trump got them, set them up in the business to do, to rush up and to do a vaccine vaccine.
	Of course, they had one of the worst vaccines.
	I can just imagine behind the scenes, look, I know you've got all these problems with baby powder and opioids and things.
	Let's get you into something for which you have no liability.
	So, three African nations have followed Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa in withdrawing the batch of the cough syrups.
	That's now six of them.
	Unacceptable high levels of diethylene glycol, they said, which is found to cause acute oral toxicity in lab animals.
	Well, it's not the same thing as the polyethylene glycol, which is the PEG, the encapsulated stuff, but still, you know, that causes a lot of people to have anaphylactic shock.
	Diethylene glycol has been reported to cause abdominal pain, an inability to pass urine, and acute kidney injury, which can be fatal.
	Yeah, we keep seeing all that stuff, don't we?
	All the time. And so I said I would mention the medication that is good for clots, as well as some other things.
	It turns out that it goes back to some Chinese medicine.
	And they noticed that they were grinding up these particular earthworms and it was having a beneficial effect.
	And so some Western scientists went there and tried to isolate what it was that was different about these earthworms.
	And they came up with an extract that they call natokinase.
	Now, I don't know. If I drop dead of a blood clot or something, you'll know it doesn't work.
	Not to the extent that it's supposed to.
	But anyway, I was told by a friend and by several listeners.
	Here's one listener. Appreciate it, Colleen.
	Says, I know you've been trying to find natural remedies for your blood pressure.
	Natokinase would be something you may be interested in looking into.
	I think it'd be great for you. So that's N-A-T-T-O-K-I-N-E-S-E. And in comments on Rockfin, Heron H says, Thank you for being brave to speak the truth to women I know aged 50 and 60 approximately in my area are fighting sudden onset breast cancer.
	One is taking chemo, the other is taking radiation.
	I'm so sorry to see that.
	There's so many things, but...
	You know, that are causing cancer, and we've seen an increase in cancer, but it is really shot through the roof and progressing much more rapidly due to this.
	Whatever the bad situation was in our food environment, they can still make it worse.
	Nancy Chambers on Rockfin.
	Today would have been my husband's 82nd birthday, but thanks to Trump's vax protocol, he is dead.
	I'm so sorry. Died alone seven days later.
	Vaxxed without consent.
	I am so sorry.
	Well, to bridge, the next thing we're going to talk about is politics.
	And I wanted to bridge into that.
	I wanted to show you a Saturday Night Live clip from back in the mid-80s.
	This is Phil Hartman.
	Saturday Night Live playing Ronald Reagan and he does an amazing job and I'll tell you why I'm playing this clip later.
	And finally Mr. President.
	President, about the Iran-Nicaraguan connection, some may wonder which was worse, your knowing or your not knowing.
	Well, all I can say is I didn't know.
	And well, we're trying to find out what happened because none of us know.
	Well, thank you, Mr.
	President. Well, I hope I've answered your questions as best I could, given the very little that I know.
	Goodbye, and God bless you.
	Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you very much.
	Okay, get back in here.
	All right, let's get down to business.
	When I saw this, I thought, fear reminds me more of Mike Johnson than he does of Ronald Reagan.
	You'll spearhead our new operation to fund the Contras.
	The C-5As with the tow missiles and grenade launchers will leave for South Africa at 0800 hours.
	I want you to supervise the loading.
	To Reagan! Yes, sir.
	Well, I'm afraid you're going to have to resign.
	But first you'll make a public statement supporting me, which I wrote myself.
	It's over there on the word processor.
	Just key in and press file.
	The code name is...
	Oh, all right, I'll do it for you.
	Now, any questions? Casper.
	Mr. President, you're going so fast.
	There's still a lot about the Iran-Nicaragua operation.
	I just don't understand. And you don't need to understand.
	I'm the president. Only I need to understand.
	Is that clear? Yes. All right.
	Carlucci, you're new. Here's how we do things.
	The red countries are the countries we sell arms to.
	The green countries are the countries where we wash our money.
	Nothing much has changed, has it?
	Your 11.30 photo opportunity, the little girl who sold the most Girl Scout cookies?
	Damn! Okay, let's get it over with.
	Everybody out! Come on! Move!
	Move! Move!
	This is the part of the job I hate.
	Well, hello little girl.
	What's yours? Well, Lisa, you're that good a sales lady.
	Maybe I could use you up on Capitol Hill.
	Well, it was nice meeting you.
	Come on, Lisa. Come on.
	Bye-bye. Bye.
	All the people coming in and taking pictures.
	Back to work! Yeah.
	It is a masterful performance by Phil Hartman.
	And I thought... Like I said, first of all, he looks...
	He does a great job of Ronald Reagan, but his physical appearance, he looks more like Mike Johnson and perhaps acts like Mike Johnson as well.
	And... But just did an amazing job.
	And I cut it short. It's very long.
	There's another spot in there where Dana Carvey comes in.
	If you want to see the rest of it, comes in and does Jimmy Stewart.
	Just an amazing impersonation of Jimmy Stewart by Dana Carvey with that as well.
	But I looked at that and I thought, you know, why haven't I seen Phil Hartman after that?
	I just didn't really see too much of him.
	And so I looked it up.
	They died at a fairly young age.
	I think it was 49 or something.
	And it was about 10 years after that skit.
	And it was his wife.
	They'd been married for 11 years.
	They seemed to have a very good relationship, according to everybody that knew them.
	They'd had dinner earlier that night.
	It didn't seem to be a problem.
	And he falls asleep, and his wife gets a gun and shoots him right between the eyes while he's asleep.
	Shot him in the chest, shot him in, I think, the stomach or something like that.
	Killed him. And then she gets in the car and she drives to a friend's house and she said, I just killed Phil.
	Come on, you're kidding. You know, he's very calm about it.
	Really strange. And I'm reading that and I'm like, this is SSRIs.
	I know. And sure enough, Zoloft.
	Zoloft. But he takes her back to the house and, you know, she insisted that she killed him and something's wrong.
	Goes back and he sees, yeah, he's been shot.
	He calls the police. She goes into the bathroom, walks herself in and shoots herself.
	Murder, suicide pills.
	SSRIs. But we're supposed to blame the gun, right?
	The gun's the problem.
	Gotta get rid of the guns. Keep the drugs, get rid of the guns, right?
	Everything for the pharmaceutical companies.
	I mean, you look at the fact that you've got the Democrats coming after gun companies, suing them directly for even manufacturing guns.
	Even though there's a law that says they can't do it, even though there's a constitutional amendment that says they can't do that kind of stuff, they're still doing it.
	But they don't touch the pharmaceutical companies.
	I mean, the SSRI stuff is not even a vaccine where they were given specific immunity by Fauci.
	They come straight for it.
	And so when you look at that, later on, her brother sued Pfizer to clear her name.
	And of course, that type of thing could have happened just because she was having, maybe she stopped taking it, right?
	That's the key thing about the SSRI stuff.
	If you're on it, And it's starting to cause other problems because it does have other problems.
	So sometimes, you know, people will be having physical symptoms like their body is on fire or something like that.
	They'll stop taking it. And that's when you have these kinds of incidents, when they stop taking it.
	We don't know. We've just seen SSRIstories.net and they've got, what was it, 9,000 different anecdotes like that?
	Like Phil Hartman's wife who killed him.
	Yeah, the vaccine companies just keep going on and on.
	And so do the calculating Machiavellian politicians.
	And that's what we're going to talk about when we come back.
	What is being pushed by the real-life version of that character that Phil Hartman was playing there.
	We've got him now as Speaker of the House.
	Third in line to the presidency.
	We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	This is a test.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Thank you.
	Well, on Rumble, Junk Silver, thank you very much for the tip.
	It says, taking a long walk every day is good for clots.
	Pfizer will never tell you that.
	Thank you. I appreciate that tip as well.
	That is something that I definitely need to do.
	I'm walking less and less.
	It's getting arthritis in one knee.
	So between that and the workload, I'm not doing nearly enough walking.
	I know what I need to do.
	It's a question of doing it, but I appreciate the advice and the concern.
	Let's talk about politics here.
	The founder of Tea Party Nation, several different groups, but this is Tea Party Nation, Judson Phillips, says 15 years later the Tea Party movement was an abject failure.
	That's his term, abject failure.
	And I said this at the time about the Tea Party movement.
	I said, here's the problem with the Tea Party movement.
	Yeah, taxed enough already.
	I get it. Taxes are way too high.
	What do we do about it? Do we just cut taxes and keep spending and let the deficit grow?
	Or do we cut programs?
	If we cut programs, which programs do we cut?
	What does a Tea Party stand for?
	Well, nothing really. They didn't really have a program.
	And everybody goes, oh, I'm all about Tea Party, you know?
	Glenn Beck really rode that horse a lot.
	Oh, Tea Party this and Tea Party that.
	It's like, what's the purpose?
	Where is it going? It doesn't have any goal.
	You know, if you're not aiming for something, you're never going to hit it.
	If you're not aiming for what you want to do to reduce taxes, either cut taxes or cut spending on other things or something like that, or both, if you don't aim for that, you're never going to hit it, of course.
	But he said that there's been an abject failure.
	He said when the Tea Party movement started, it was triggered by Obama's $787 billion stimulus package.
	$787 billion.
	Those are the good old days, were they?
	Yeah. That's called a stimulus package.
	Today, that is a rounding error, he says.
	The deficit was $10 billion when Trump took over in January of 2009.
	Today, it is $34 trillion.
	Wow. So, let's just knock off some zeros there, from $10 billion to $34 trillion.
	That's the same as going from $10 to $34,000.
	We can understand that, right?
	You know, the Ilians, when you get into the Ilians, I can't get my head around that.
	But it's just the same as going from $10 deficit on your personal account.
	Let's say you got a credit card, right?
	Well, I got a $10 balance on my credit card when I first got this thing.
	But here we are after...
	After I let Obama use a credit card and Trump use a credit card and Biden use a credit card, they run up a bill of $34,000 on my card.
	I only had $10 on there before these guys got started.
	That's the way you ought to think about it.
	It's going up by a trillion dollars every hundred days and that rate is accelerating, he said.
	And he said Republican lawmakers didn't do anything.
	They didn't do anything when they were granted the opportunity to hold the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and in the U.S. Senate.
	And at the beginning of the Trump administration, we had Republican control of both houses and the presidency, and they did nothing about the budget.
	They did nothing about the border.
	Any of these existential issues.
	Nothing. He said, we brought the Republican Party back to life.
	They had nothing after John McCain was wiped out in 2008.
	We got them a majority in the House in 2010, and they did nothing with it.
	As a matter of fact, you go back and you look, I've mentioned it many times.
	North Carolina had got a Republican legislature for the first time since Reconstruction in 2010.
	Obama had carried North Carolina in 2008.
	And then every statewide office, as well as both houses, went Republican two years later.
	People did not like what he was doing.
	For many of the same, and what he was doing then is tiny compared to what is going on under Trump and Biden.
	All the crises that we have, whether it's a fiscal crisis of deficits and taxes, or whether it's the open border, or whether it's medical stuff.
	I mean, you look at everybody was concerned about death panels with Obamacare.
	Yeah, you should have been concerned about it.
	If the government controls your health care, they're going to tell you if or when or what kind of health care you can have.
	Well, what do we get under Trump?
	You see, if it had been done under Hillary Clinton, everybody would have said, we told you this is what was going to happen, and when you went to Obamacare, that was just the gradual steps.
	You know, like Fauci said, we do it from the inside, we do it with disruption, and we do it iteratively, and everybody would have understood, this is the next iteration of Obamacare.
	Except it was done by Trump, and we didn't see that, right?
	Well, I saw it, and you guys saw it as well, but the general public did not see it, right?
	And so, 2010, people are already pushing back against it, but going back to what he said.
	But again, you know, gave them a majority in the House in 2010, they did nothing.
	We got the most liberal Republican nominee in the history of the party in 2012, Mitt Romney, who could have just as easily fit in as a Democrat, because he had already, in 2012, they decided they were going to push through Obamacare.
	And he had already done Obamacare with Ted Kennedy as governor of Massachusetts.
	So he really did fit in as a Democrat.
	Either way, you're going to get it.
	Just like in the 1992 election, you were going to get NAFTA if you got George H.W. Bush or Bill Clinton.
	Both of them were for NAFTA. You had Ross Perot, who was against it, but they took care of him.
	But, you know, they do that. When they've got an agenda, they get somebody in there who's going to push it, you know, regardless of whether the Republican or Democrat wins.
	That central thing, they need to move along.
	Whether it's NAFTA or whether it's Obamacare, they're going to make sure that the two puppets both agree on that.
	Then in 2014, we got Republicans control of the Senate.
	What did they do?
	They made sure their lobbyists got their projects funded, and they funded a few other things, but they didn't cut spending.
	Absolutely not. In regards to the 2024 election, he says the U.S. has passed the point of no return.
	Adding that the former President Trump wins the election, his presidency would simply be buying more time before there is a complete economic meltdown.
	Well, I didn't even know that he's going to buy any more time.
	He may actually accelerate it, as he did in his first term.
	Because, see, you've got to have principles.
	That's the, you know, it's not enough.
	I keep thinking back to the musical Gypsy, because I did a lot of stuff, and Karen did a lot of stuff with musicals.
	The strippers are teaching her, you've got to have a gimmick.
	Well, they've got gimmicks.
	They've got gimmicks all over the place to win applause, right?
	But you've got to have principles.
	If you're going to change anything.
	And so you've got to have a goal.
	You've got to have principles. You know, the globalists have all these goals, sustainable development goals and all these other things.
	Not only that, not only do they have things that they want to accomplish, but they've got a specific date by which they want this stuff accomplished.
	If you don't have a date on your goal, you've got a wish, not a goal.
	And they're very specific about that.
	We're still struggling around to try to find a goal.
	And so you've got to have principles.
	And then you've got to have principles even when you're not running for office, right?
	After you win, you can't just throw those things away, which is what they always do.
	And you've got to hold these people to these principles.
	This is what makes it so amazing to me to see what Mike Johnson is doing in an election year.
	In an election year.
	It is a race to the bottom.
	You know, people are looking at Biden and they can't stand what he's doing and his people don't like what he's doing.
	And Republicans are, you got Republicans in terms of we're going to do nothing about the border and I'm going to increase surveillance of Americans to levels that we've never seen before.
	I'm going to package all these bills together and send them over at the last minute and tell everybody, now you got to pass it because we're at the deadline.
	You got all this stuff that's happening in an election year.
	They usually wait.
	Until the year after the election did all this really bad stuff to us.
	You know, try to drag us into wars and bankruptcy and all the rest of the stuff.
	They're doing it now. Can you imagine what it's going to be like next year?
	Anyway, if you look at the history of the Republicans, he said...
	When did they ever cut spending?
	The answer is they didn't.
	If you look at Trump, his attitude towards debt is that of a businessman, not of someone who is looking at the government.
	He thinks that debt is good because if he gets overwhelmed with debt, he can just declare bankruptcy, which he's done over and over again.
	Six casinos, just declare bankruptcy, and I'm out of it.
	Wash my hands. He says, but guess what?
	We can't bankrupt the national debt of the United States.
	We can't declare bankruptcy. The Constitution prohibits that.
	Trump didn't veto any spending bills because they spent too much in his first term.
	And past performance is the best basis of future work.
	I'm sorry, he said.
	I'm just not optimistic here.
	He doesn't even talk about the fact that Trump set us on the path to a $6 trillion a year spending.
	The fact that, you know, it went vertical under him with all this stuff.
	Universal basic income and lockdown and stimulus checks and all the rest of this.
	You know, it's interesting.
	The Simpsons talked about this in season 11.
	Back in 1999.
	It was an episode, Bart to the Future.
	And so you've got an adult Bart Simpson, but Lisa has become president of the United States.
	As you know, we've inherited quite a budget crunch from President Trump.
	How bad is it, Secretary Van Houten?
	We're broke!
	Yeah, we're broke.
	So there's that.
	And then there's the spy state.
	A massive betrayal in election year.
	And besides the fact that we're broke and adding another trillion dollars every 90 to 100 days, you have massive new spending for wars abroad offered by Speaker Johnson, as well as this major betrayal of surveillance.
	The House reauthorizing the Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
	They have completely subverted...
	And turned upside down, inside out, 180 degrees, whatever you want to say, the FISA Act, which is supposed to stop the spying, this has now become a vehicle to give them legal cover to spy.
	The only person who's really been consistent on this, amazingly, is a Democrat, Ron Wyden, who I disagree with him on everything, but he's always been there in terms of domestic surveillance for some reason.
	You know, he was the one who asked the question of James Clapper.
	Are you spying on the American people?
	Well, Senator, not intentionally.
	Yeah, right. This is pretty intentional, and it's pretty hidden.
	And when people are questioning these congressmen on this committee, they just come back and say, well, this is classified.
	I can't tell you anything, and you're not entitled to know anything about that anyway.
	It's no wonder that these people have kicked their responsibility over to the bureaucracy.
	Where we have taxation without representation, we have regulation without representation, and all the rest of this stuff.
	Because they don't want to represent us anyway.
	And so, Ron Wyden said in the post, he said, this bill represents one of the most dramatic and terrifying expansions of government surveillance authority in history.
	Other people are saying it's like another Patriot Act in terms of its extent.
	Again, he's good on this, but only on this.
	But, you know, we just take these things issue by issue.
	Really do. It's all you can do.
	So Elizabeth Goyden, co-director of Liberty and National Security Programs, had a very long list of, a very long Twitter thread.
	And as part of that, she said, buried in this Section 702 reauthorization bill, Passed by the House last Friday is the biggest expansion of domestic surveillance since the Patriot Act.
	Wyden calls his power terrifying, and he's right.
	She says under current law, the government can compel electronic communication service providers that have direct access to communications to assist the NSA in conducting Section 702 surveillance.
	In the past, that would mean things like Verizon and Google.
	We'd have to turn over the communications of any Section 702 surveillance targets.
	And the targets have to be foreigners who are overseas.
	See, that's the key thing. They thought they had this sewed up, right, with the FISA. You can't spy on Americans without a search warrant.
	And you can't even spy on foreigners who are in America without a search warrant.
	And you can't spy on Americans abroad without a search warrant.
	You can only spy on foreigners abroad under this FISA Act.
	And they start saying, yeah, but what about if you've got that foreigner abroad and he has communications with an American?
	Or he's got communications with another foreigner who has communications with another foreigner who eventually has communications with an American, you see?
	This is like the six degrees of separation of Kevin Bacon.
	And they can go two or three different hops.
	When I talked to William Benny, he was talking about how, you know, you just go like three hops and you pretty much get everybody.
	So, the targets have to be foreigners overseas, but the communications can and do include communications with Americans.
	The House has now vastly expanded the universe of entities that can be compelled to assist the NSA. So, it's no longer just the phone company, Verizon, or Google that have to turn this information over.
	Any company, this is what's been changed with Speaker Johnson that he's pushing so hard.
	And of course, bipartisan.
	You had 86 Republicans join in on this.
	The committee that is, like I said before when I talked about this, there was a split in the Republican Party between people who were on the House Judiciary Committee who were concerned about search warrants.
	And abuses about that.
	Or the Republicans who are on the committee that was tied to the Intelligence Committee.
	Let's just say the CIA. There's people like that.
	They want it. The people who are about the rule of law don't want it, right?
	Because we have this organization that has taken over, and the real government in America is really this coalition between the Intelligence Committee and the military-industrial complex.
	We call it the Ick, Mick, or the Mickick, or something like that.
	It's really the spies.
	The spies in the Pentagon, or the pentagram, I guess we should call it the spy pentagram axis that's controlling our government.
	That's probably a better way to do it, because they love to do the eyeball things.
	We call it the eye pentagram.
	How about that? The eye pentagram.
	It even ties into the back of the dollar bill.
	They always love to put this single eye there, don't they?
	They call their coalition...
	Of spy agencies, English-speaking spy agencies, they call it the Five Eyes.
	Five countries. U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
	Five eyes. Their eyes.
	The Eye of Horus or something, right?
	That's what these guys always go back to.
	Creepy. Occultic.
	That's what they are. So, I guess we call it the...
	I spy pentagram. Any company or individual that provides any service whatsoever may be forced to assist in NSA surveillance as long as they have access to equipment on which communications are transmitted or stored.
	So that means any router, any server, any cell tower, etc.
	So that sweeps in an enormous range of U.S. businesses that provide Wi-Fi to their customers.
	Barbershops, laundromats, fitness centers, hardware stores, dentist offices, fast food places.
	One of my longest friends, this is 20 years ago when Wi-Fi was a fairly new thing.
	And so he goes to the fast food place and got a sign up that says free Wi-Fi.
	And the person in front of him places his order how many hamburgers and Prize he wants and all this other kind of stuff.
	And he goes, oh, and I'd like some of that free Wi-Fi.
	And the clerk who's there doesn't know what he's talking about.
	I'd like some of that free Wi-Fi.
	But my friend is looking at the sign.
	He knows what he's talking about, free Wi-Fi.
	And they go back and forth for a while.
	He's dying, trying to keep from laughing out loud.
	But yeah, if you provide free Wi-Fi, They want a sniffy of whatever you're getting from anybody out there.
	It also includes commercial landlords or offices of journalists and lawyers and non-profits and financial advisors and health care providers and on and on and on.
	In other words, everybody.
	Everybody. It's just like East Germany, except it's a lot worse.
	As a matter of fact, one person contacted the ranking Democrat member.
	And said, this is looking like the Stasi.
	He got really offended about that.
	He said, well, I've seen all this stuff, and I've seen stuff that is classified, and you can't see it.
	And there's nothing like the Stasi in here.
	Yeah, it's a lot worse.
	A lot worse than the Stasi.
	Because it's algorithmic.
	And because it is automated and they have the power of computers and they have the ability to data mine, it's going to get more and more automated and more and more data mining as they bring in artificial intelligence to help them.
	It's much, much worse than the Stasi where you had half of the people spying on the other half of the people all the time.
	The amendment even extends to service providers who come into our homes.
	House cleaners, plumbers, people performing repairs, IT service providers, anybody who has access to laptops and routers inside of our homes could be forced to serve as surrogate spies.
	Or you could be forced to serve as a spy on them, you see.
	None of these people or businesses would be allowed to tell anybody about the assistance that they were compelled to provide.
	They, like you, would be put under a gag order.
	And you would face heavy penalties if you failed to comply with it.
	And that's not even the worst part.
	Unlike Google and Verizon, most of these businesses and individuals like the ability to isolate and to turn over a target's communication.
	So you'll have to give everything, perhaps even the equipment itself.
	So they can just narrow it down to one, but you just can turn over everything.
	NSA has a carte blanche to look at everything.
	This is why, you know, when Speaker Johnson said he's a war speaker, people just need to shut up because it's a really difficult job.
	Look, we are in unprecedented times, okay?
	We're in dangerous times.
	This has been articulated here, around the world, and here at home.
	We need steady leadership.
	We need steady hands at the wheel.
	Look, I regard myself as a wartime speaker.
	I mean, in a literal sense, we are.
	I knew that when I took the gavel.
	I didn't anticipate that this would be an easy path.
	Former Speaker Newt Gingrich posted a couple days ago on his social media that this is the hardest challenge that's faced a speaker probably in the history of the country, in the moment we're in right now.
	He said, arguably, maybe comparable to the Civil War, but maybe worse.
	Well, you know, Newt's a bit of a globalist as well himself, but he did say something I thought was very wise.
	He said, you look at what's happening.
	You got 80% of the people who want this and 20% of the people who want that.
	Where do you want to be? Where do you want to be, Mike Johnson?
	We're in an election year here.
	Where do you want to be? You want to be with the 80% of the 20%?
	Well, he got $20 billion in one quarter, so I guess we know where he wants to be.
	He wants to be with the money side.
	And he was told coming in, you're going to be a wartime speaker.
	I said, when I played that clip yesterday, I said, so when did we have that vote about war?
	You know, that's your responsibility, speaker.
	You should know that we don't go to war without a declaration, and you were the guys who were supposed to do that.
	When did we have that?
	I missed it. And I said, well, maybe he's talking about war with us.
	A literal war with us, he said.
	Literally at war.
	The NSA having wholesale access to domestic communications on an unprecedented scale would then be on the honor system.
	You know, they're going to get your entire device and all your records and anything because you can't separate the stuff out.
	And they'll be able to pull out and retain whatever they want.
	House leaders deny the administration has any intent to use this provision so broadly.
	Listen to their excuse. Supposedly, there is a single type of service provider that the government wants to rope in, but they didn't want anybody to know what that type of service provider was, so they hid the real goal by writing in the amendment as broadly and as vaguely as possible.
	So we want this particular type of service provider, but let's just put everything in there.
	So they don't know what we really want.
	Well, we know what you really want.
	You really want everything.
	Oh, don't worry. That's the only one that we're going to do.
	We're on an honor system, of course.
	These people don't even know the meaning of honor.
	So, the administration's not actually going to use all that power.
	It just persuaded the House to give it.
	And, of course, it is being pushed by Biden.
	Speaker Johnson is rubber stamping everything the Biden administration wants.
	Tell me again, because I was just talking about that, and Brendan Smith was saying, you know, I used to think that there was no difference between Republicans and Democrats, but now with Trump, I know there's a big difference.
	Tell me again about that difference there.
	And when you've got Trump doing everything that all the other globalist presidents are doing at exactly the same time, what is the difference?
	You know, we didn't see a difference politically from one country to the other.
	I don't see a difference within our own country.
	You know, we got this supposedly hard-right Christian conservative congressman who was that way before he evidently had discussions with people saying, hey, we're going to have wars.
	Let's let you be the wartime speaker.
	We'll get lots of money to you.
	And he immediately comes out and says, yeah, I oppose all that money for Ukraine, but now I'm all for it.
	How much do you want to increase the IRS? I'm all for that too.
	He's not even going to go with the McCarthy reductions.
	We're back to growing it, make it seven times bigger than it was going to be, instead of just five times bigger.
	We're going back to what Pelosi wanted, what Biden wants.
	Give them everything they want.
	Because you want to go to war with the American people?
	Well, you go to war with them by using the NSA. You go to war with them by using the IRS. You go to war with them by using the FBI, as we talked about in that interview yesterday.
	They're going to get a new headquarters center.
	It's going to be twice the size of the Jagger Hoover building that they've got now, but of course they'll keep the Jagger Hoover building as well.
	So in other words, they're going to be three times bigger.
	And that's not just, you know, that's just their headquarters.
	How many other people are they going to be adding in all these other different places?
	So we explode the size of the surveillance police state.
	We explode the size of the people around there constantly entrapping Americans based on their political positions.
	We explode the size of the tax collectors.
	And our Republican conservative leader, speaker, is all for it.
	He's right there. No difference between him and Biden at all.
	So, he says, I can't overstate how mind-blowingly irresponsible this is.
	I don't think any administration should be trusted with an Orwellian power like this one.
	Even if this administration doesn't plan to make full use of it, go ahead and fill in the rest of this.
	Right? We all know. And she said, there's certain powers a government should never have in a democracy.
	And these are the powers these people are, you know, breaking legs to get.
	You come with us on this or you're out.
	Again, the guy, Jim Hines, the ranking Democrat.
	She said, here's the thoughtful and conscientious reply he made to somebody who was concerned about this.
	You know, yes, I know exactly what's in there.
	Some of it is classified. None of it is Stasi-like.
	You can sell your nonsense somewhere else, he said.
	This is the arrogance of politicians in an election year.
	We're well into the election year.
	This is their arrogance in an election year.
	They know that they're not accountable.
	They know that these federal elections mean absolutely nothing.
	Folks, the federal level is gone.
	It's been gone for a long time.
	It is bankrupt. It is non-responsive.
	It is arrogant. It is at war with us.
	And both the Democrats and Republicans fit that bill at the federal level.
	They both do.
	There's a handful that are good on one issue or the other.
	About the only guy that I agree with on everything, and he always sticks out by himself, is Thomas Massey.
	I've got to say that so far, he's been 100% in my book.
	Everything that I've seen him do, I agree with.
	And everything that he does usually is a courageous stand-by-himself move.
	I think he's better than Ron Paul, frankly.
	The White House will tell senators they have no choice other than pass the House bill because this is going to expire tomorrow, April the 19th.
	What a famous day, April the 19th.
	Yeah, the day the British came for the guns at Concord and Lexington.
	The day the Nazis burned down the resistance at the Warsaw Ghetto because these people took the guns from the Nazis and held down some Panzer Division for quite a while.
	They just burned them down in Warsaw.
	And the day that the ATF and FBI Burned down all those men, women, and children at the Branch Davidian compound.
	Over guns, again.
	Just burned them alive.
	This April 19th deadline only exists on paper.
	A notational deadline is no reason to create a surveillance state.
	The Senate must take the time to get this right.
	It's not just our civil liberties that are at stake.
	It is our democracy.
	Well, it is our republic.
	It is our constitution. That's Elizabeth Goyton.
	And she's absolutely right about that.
	But it tells you who the real government is, doesn't it?
	Can't we not see that the real government is the I pentagram?
	And can we not see who serves the I pentagram?
	The single I pentagram.
	We need a logo for that, I guess.
	Can't sell it as a t-shirt.
	Nobody would want to have this kind of a cultic thing wearing it around.
	It's like, so what cult are you in?
	But, you know, just take the Pentagon from an aerial viewpoint and you stick that single eye in it and you got it right there.
	But nobody's going to want to wear that t-shirt.
	Maybe we could give one to Speaker Johnson.
	He would probably wear it.
	The removal of Speaker Johnson heats up.
	Yeah, we know what his war is now.
	It's the war against the Constitution.
	It's the war against Americans.
	Thomas Massey, as I pointed out yesterday, joining Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	But so far, it's just the two of them opposed to that.
	Well, a couple others have said something about it, but they're not signing on to this thing to remove him.
	As a matter of fact, you've got one Republican from North Dakota, Kelly Armstrong, who told the hell that...
	In terms of talking about these efforts to throw Johnson out, he says, I don't know who at this point would want the job.
	Well, you better find out because that's the person that you really want in the job.
	The person you want in the Speaker of the House is not the person who is seeking it.
	Not the person who wants $20 billion a quarter like Speaker Johnson.
	It's the person who doesn't want it.
	That's the way it used to be done.
	That's why you would have nominating committees, because it was considered to be a very, very bad form for somebody to put themselves forward.
	Look at the self-serving politicians we have now, and look at the kind of government we have now.
	And so, I had Joel Skousen on the other day.
	I thought it was funny. He's going to run for the Constitution Party.
	So he's talking to some other people there, and it's like, would you want, well, I don't know.
	Okay, I'll do it. And it reminds me of when we were in the Libertarian Party.
	It's like, so who's going to run for the different offices here?
	And it's like, I don't want to do it.
	Well, I did it last time, and so-and-so did it last time.
	It's your turn to run.
	Come on. You've got to do it this time.
	We've done it before. You've got to do it.
	That's the kind of people you really want to have in office.
	So I don't know who out of the Republican Party would want this.
	Well, you know, if you can find somebody who really doesn't want it, who really, really, really doesn't want it, not just because they don't want the brickbats and the, you know, the criticism and everything, but they really don't want to be empowered.
	That's the person you really want to have.
	And he says, and now we're walking into an election cycle.
	Yeah, we're in an election cycle, and they don't care at all what people want.
	You know, Johnson is tripling down on mortgaging America's future to pay off the Ukrainian leader, Zelensky.
	As Breitbart puts it, the House will vote on Saturday night on a yet-to-be-released foreign aid package.
	So they're sending all this stuff over to the Senate.
	And what he's doing is he's packaging these four bills along with FISA and TikTok and stuff.
	He's got all these other things.
	He's sending all that over to get them to pass this stuff on, sending the FISA thing over for them to pass this bill.
	On tomorrow.
	And then he's going to put the four bills together.
	He's going to have the House pass the military spending bills on Saturday and then send all four of them over to the Senate to be approved as a giant package.
	This was always reprehensible when Pelosi did it.
	And it still is reprehensible, even though it's now become standard operating procedure.
	Yeah, so just tell me that this guy is not owned by the I and Pentagram.
	Johnson texted House Republicans late Wednesday morning that he would soon release the text of three bills to fund America's national security interests and allies, as he put it.
	Those three bills to fund Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan will be packaged together with a fourth bill that combines the REPO Act, the TikTok ban, and sanctions and other measures into a single rule.
	There you go. That's exactly what the establishment wants, is what he's doing.
	Now, J.D. Vance, new senator out of Ohio, says the rumored course of action in the House, combine Ukraine and Israel aid with other Biden boondoggles, send it all to the Senate as a combined package, then let the House vote on a fake border security package that has no chance?
	He says this is not only betrayal, but it's stupid politics to boot.
	It's almost like they want the Democrats to take control of the Senate this next time, isn't it?
	Newsflash for Speaker Johnson said Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	We've already passed.
	The Senate has it and refuses to secure our border.
	They want 5,000 illegals per day to come in.
	The House passed $14 billion for Israel aid in November and the Senate refuses to pass it.
	You, Speaker Johnson, voted against $300 million for Ukraine before we gave you the gavel.
	You're with a majority of Republicans at that time.
	And of course, with all this happening, just remember, at the border, we really do have a literal invasion.
	And this is a literal invasion of cartels who have the money to just drive this expensive boat just at full speed right up onto the beach.
	And you've got about 20 guys running.
	It's like a military assault, jumping out of this thing and just abandoning that expensive boat.
	Now, who can do that? Well, the same kind of cartels that are in a literal war.
	With Mexico and other Central American countries.
	And the drug war that has run for so long has created so much wealth and power in these criminal operations that they're now challenging nation states throughout Central and South America and they will challenge this nation state as well.
	And there's the invasion happening right there.
	You've got a massive sea of people coming across thousands at a time in caravans, and then you've got cartels that are doing this repeatedly.
	That's not the only one.
	That one was caught on, but people are saying that's happening all the time.
	They buy these expensive boats, use them once, and just abandon them because they've got so much money and power.
	And we're being abandoned.
	You know, they're abandoning their boats, but we have been abandoned by our politicians.
	Totally neglecting the southern border.
	Scott Perry, Jim Banks, Republicans, said, this is insanity.
	And in this foreign aid framework, there is nothing for the U.S., nothing for us.
	It is all for other countries.
	You know, they're coming in, they're upset about the fact that we're giving three times as much to Ukraine as we are to Israel.
	Where do we get the money to give to any of them?
	We're busted. We have trillions of dollars in debt.
	And they are going to ground this economy and just abandon it.
	Why? Well, because just like that boat that you saw, these people, these parasites, don't care about the host.
	You know, they're like, they are, these politicians are like parasites.
	They will destroy the country that they're feeding on, America, and then they'll just move on to something else.
	Or they'll come in and they'll pick the bones.
	So what does Trump say about all this stuff?
	He says, well, we'll see what happens.
	He doesn't want to take a position on any of this.
	Because he's a pure opportunist.
	He's a fence-sitter.
	He doesn't have any principles.
	He's going to show no leadership, and that includes on the border or foreign wars.
	He's just going to sit on the sidelines and watch what happens.
	He doesn't want to get involved in any of this because he has no principles.
	He will make no difference or he will be used.
	The difference that he'll make is he'll be there as a pacifier in the mouth of conservatives.
	As a matter of fact, just to show you what he really cares about, he is now saying that if any candidates use his likeness in their campaign, he wants a cut.
	He wants a cut of the money they bring in.
	It's always been about the money.
	And it's always been about the celebrity.
	He is a celebrity candidate looking to make himself wealthier.
	It's always been about money and celebrity for him.
	And it still is. It's not about principles whatsoever.
	Even before he ran, he trademarked MAGA. He trademarked that in 2012.
	And then it became effective in 2015.
	I remember when that happened.
	I actually talked about it on there.
	I said, so how in the world is Make America Great Again?
	How is that something that is so brilliant that it could be trademarked, first of all?
	But I've never seen a political candidate trademark their campaign slogan like that before.
	I said, it shows that it's just all about money with him.
	He wants to trademark it so he can merchandise it.
	And he did take legal action to support that trademark.
	He got it in 2012, and then as his campaign kicked off, he made it effective.
	Because he's all about the money.
	And so Forbes points out that if he's telling people that using his likeness in their campaign stuff, candidates who use his name, his image, his likeness, have been asked, asked.
	It's just a request. But there's some things in here if you don't go along with the request.
	If they use his name, his image, his likeness, they've been asked to split a minimum 5% of all fundraising solicitations to Trump and to the Republican National Committee, which is now co-chaired by his daughter-in-law.
	Any split that is higher than 5% quote will be seen favorably by the RNC and President Trump's campaign.
	Throw in some bonus points with us.
	Give me more than 5%.
	But you better give me at least 5% or you're going to be, you know, the RNC is going to come after you.
	Trump's going to come after you.
	Everybody is scared to death of Trump.
	I look at politicians even at the state level that I have had a lot of respect for what they do at the state level who become sycophants, who are tweeting stuff about Trump, who are groveling to Trump.
	They're scared to death.
	Of him and of his MAGA mob.
	People like Laura Looney.
	People like that. Hey, Laura, you're pathetic.
	I don't care what you do.
	I'm just amazing.
	She is a caricature.
	A caricature.
	Plastic surgery and plastic policies.
	It's just amazing. Plastic politicians.
	Trump's campaign also asked candidates and committees to avoid speaking on behalf of Trump and their messaging, mentioning his family, or questioning readers' support of Trump and more.
	Business relationships between vendors and Trump's fundraising committee will be suspended if the guidelines are violated.
	Well, there you go. RNC will cut you off in every way possible if you don't follow him.
	Finally, when we look at Germany, we can see a reflection of what is happening here under our Speaker Johnson and the extension of FISA, the biggest extension that we've seen.
	The head of Germany's spy agency...
	He's advocating for spying on people's speech as well as their thoughts.
	You see, Heinz, the Democrat, who got so upset because a constituent said, you guys are acting like Stasi.
	Well, you know, the Germans know all about the Stasi.
	And he's right.
	This isn't the Stasi.
	What Germany and the U.S. and all these people are doing right now is far, far worse than what the Stasi did.
	Because Astazi was getting everybody snitching on everybody else and they didn't have the manpower to go through and collate all this stuff.
	We do have the manpower to do all that stuff.
	And that makes it a lot worse.
	A lot worse. Because of the technology that's been added to this.
	A German paper gave their commentary on some of the salient parts of this guy who is, his name is Haldenwang.
	He is head of the German spy agency.
	As they point out, he likes to write in the pluralist majestis, majestis, right?
	In other words, the royal we. He says, yes, we are often in the media for specific occasions in order to enable an informed political debate even below the bands.
	This is part of our legal mandate as an early warning system.
	As the German newspaper says, well, in plain language, what he wants to do is to spread suspicion.
	One waits in vain for a word of self-criticism here.
	For example, in today's journal on June 20th, 2023, he saw it as his task to lower the political party AFD. He wanted to lower their poll ratings.
	That's what he puts on today's journal.
	So he's specifically coming after a political party to take down their poll ratings.
	Clearly taking the side of the last generation as well.
	These are the eco-terrorists who call themselves the last generation.
	They've been involved in acts of violence and arson and all kinds of things, blocking traffic, that type of thing.
	That's the last generation people.
	He said, the last generation is not extremist.
	Although they commit crimes, they do not engage in extremism.
	And he doesn't care if they commit crimes.
	Alden Bang therefore sees no reason at present.
	To monitor the last generation.
	But the people who don't commit any crimes, AFD, who are merely political opposition, he does monitor.
	He also writes, freedom of opinion also has limits.
	The most extreme limits are set by criminal law, for example, with regard to punishable propaganda offenses or incitement to hatred.
	Oh, yeah, we got hate laws.
	But listen to this.
	He says, however, even below the criminal law limits and without prejudice to their legality, Expressions of opinion can be relevant in terms of constitutional protection law.
	If the Office for the Protection of the Constitution becomes active below the criminality limit, The newspaper said this means nothing less than that all legal recourse and all review of state actions are excluded.
	Anyone accused of crimes can defend themselves in court, and judicial decisions are bound by law.
	But if this is something below the level of criminality, then we've got something altogether different.
	And this has been the case in America for a very long time.
	When you look at civil asset forfeiture, well, this is not a crime.
	This is a civil action.
	If this was a violation of a law put in by your elected representatives, then you would have due process and you would have protection against excessive punishment and things like that.
	But this is not that. You have no presumption of innocence.
	You have no due process or protection against the fines because this is just a civil rule created by the bureaucracy.
	This is below the level of criminality.
	This is a kind of legal fiction.
	That they've been running against us for a long time.
	And of course, the drug war was justification for this.
	So you can get no due process and even more severe penalties than you could if it was something that was legal.
	So, as I point out in this newspaper, the government itself in Germany said that for the year 2022...
	The number of crimes that they had from left-wing extremists was 13,542.
	For right-wing extremism, 10,788.
	So in other words, 55% of violent crimes were left-wing, 45% right-wing.
	This guy doesn't care about left-wing.
	He doesn't care about the 55%.
	He's only concerned about 45%.
	And he's concerned about right-wing political beliefs and political parties.
	And he doesn't care about crimes.
	He cares about what he thinks is extremism.
	He doesn't care at all about crimes or violence.
	So, they invent a new kind of criminal offense.
	The alleged disparaging of the state.
	This is beyond hate crime stuff.
	You disparaged the state.
	What does that mean? Well, what that means is actually you're criticizing the state's measures against things like COVID or things like climate.
	If you criticize those measures, you are disparaging the state.
	And we will come after you.
	That is exactly what these people have done.
	And just one last thing.
	Do you think there's a difference between left and right?
	Donald Trump's billionaire donor gave Letitia James $36,000.
	This is from Newsweek, but the headline is not accurate.
	As a matter of fact, it's a billionaire couple, the Katzmatidis, I don't have their last name, but they gave $515,000 to Trump for his presidential campaign in 2020.
	$515,000.
	However, this time around, they gave $36,000 to Letitia James and $33,000 to Trump.
	They're giving them exactly the same thing this time around.
	They're supposedly on opposite ends, right?
	They are diametrically opposed to each other.
	And yet, these billionaires who know how things work, who buy influence, and they don't care about principles, they don't care about policies, as I am.
	I'm buying my way.
	This is why we have so much money.
	When you look at the amount of money that's being spent on these federal campaigns, That is basically a metric of growing corruption.
	Because people like this are just buying personal access, and they're going to buy it from both sides.
	And whoever wins, they're going to get an amazing return on their investment.
	Give them tens of thousands of dollars, and you get back tens of millions of dollars in some special project that they'll help you with.
	That's what is going on.
	That's why we see these campaigns skyrocketing.
	That's one of the reasons why Speaker Johnson got $20 billion in one quarter.
	One quarter. At that rate, he's going to get $80 billion in a year.
	As I said, that's more than...
	Al Gore had in the presidential race altogether in 2000.
	He had $70 billion.
	George W. Bush had $100 billion.
	But you've got Speaker Johnson collecting it at the rate of $80 billion in just one year.
	On Rockfin, we're going to take a break here and join with Tony before we do.
	On Rockfin, thank you very much, James, for the tip.
	I appreciate that. And Heron H. to Karen says, Karen Knight, your Thai background pics are so lovely.
	Did you get my email regarding history books?
	Well, I'll have to ask her. I think, I'm not sure if she got that or not, but she appreciates the comment because she does work very hard on getting the backgrounds and the ties to match.
	And she will really appreciate that you noticed and liked it.
	And I appreciate what she does as well.
	And she does many other things behind the scenes that nobody sees.
	We'll be right back. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com www.TheDavidKnightShow.com Okay, and joining us now is Tony Arterman, and he has Wise Wolf Gold.
	He set up davidknight.gold to take you there and let him know that you've come through us.
	And right now, gold is at the center of everything, isn't it, Tony?
	It's amazing to see everybody turning to gold.
	We've even got the president of El Salvador, who has been very heavily into Bitcoin and pushing that.
	Now he's even actually embracing gold.
	What's going on? Absolutely amazing times, David.
	I just read one of the funniest headlines was Zimbabwe has a new gold-backed currency, and they're saying implicitly, we're not going to create more currency units than the gold reserves that we have.
	Now, if anybody knows anything about Zimbabwe, it was the international joke because they had the trillion-dollar notes of fiat.
	So this is a complete 180 and a departure from really where the world's been since 1971.
	they took us off the gold standard.
	Now we have a lot of reporting coming out, this major buyers that really, you peel down the layers, it becomes China.
	And a lot of these gold distributors that were making like one ounce gold bars for people around the world are actually turning into kilo bars This is happening all over Europe.
	I'm noticing this in my business.
	It's weird. The price of gold continuing to go up, continuing to break all-time highs, but the buyers for large amounts of gold in the public sphere are actually decreasing.
	But the buyers in the larger central bank buyers, those are increasing.
	So it's a strange time.
	You're seeing a lot of dealers like me taking in a lot of buys, and those bars and all those ounces, I believe, probably flowing up somewhere to central banks and larger buyers and institutions.
	And it's really interesting, David.
	It's across the board, and it's driving the gold price.
	And I know the financial analysts are all very confused by it because it has nothing to do...
	Really with the markets, the Federal Reserve and Jerome Powell's language about raising rates or lowering rates, it isn't really moving gold.
	I think that's confusing people because it's really about global demand and it's unprecedented global demand by central banks and especially players like China.
	I kind of referenced it quickly yesterday.
	read all the different quotes, but there were about 10 different people that are involved with the Federal Reserve talking about how, well, you know, I don't think we're going to move as quickly to reduce interest rates and all of them talking about how we're going to hold them there and kind of hinting that it's going to stay at these rates or maybe go up.
	They're putting all this stuff out, as you've talked about many, many times.
	The interest rates are their way of attacking gold.
	They're trying.
	So now they're talking about, well, we're going to keep interest rates up and not lower them and that type of thing.
	But that's not causing gold to go down.
	And you've talked about this in the past as well.
	Isn't it interesting that, you know, they keep raising interest rates and things like that and it really hasn't tanked gold?
	And it has and all these comments from the Federal Reserve about how we're going to keep interest rates strong, in other words, to keep the dollar strong.
	All of these comments have not affected gold whatsoever.
	And the price of gold, as we point out, even though it's up hitting new records all the time, we've got all the central banks continue to accumulate it, even though it is hitting these record levels.
	The Federal Reserve Bank had a net loss on its balance sheets of $948 billion.
	The people that make the money actually lost money.
	And I know that escapes the irony.
	I need to talk to Nancy Pelosi.
	Figure out how she does it. And one of the reasons why they're net losers, and they have to go against gold, didn't they?
	And the horse is out of the barn.
	You can't put this back. And this is why we talked about last week, we hit a trillion dollars in debt in this country every 90 to 100 days now.
	The wheels are off.
	You talk about Mike Johnson or whatever his budget is.
	Pray tell, Mike, what war are you, a wartime speaker of?
	Has this been announced? I know it's not been voted on by Congress, but this is how these people think.
	It's unlimited. There's a printing press.
	We have it. We're the world's reserve currency.
	You have Janet Yellen saying that there's $300 billion.
	That we've seized of Russian assets around the world through the SWIFT system and other financial networks that we're holding.
	We've frozen. And that's part of the weaponization of the dollar.
	No wonder the world's moving away from the dollar.
	The rules are rigged against other countries.
	If you mess with the hegemonic dominance of the United States and our power, we're going to punish you.
	Well, I think BRICS is the answer to that.
	BRICS wants to move away.
	They are moving away.
	It's insane to watch David in real time, and I don't think that the financial networks certainly don't get it.
	The majority of Americans don't get it because we've always been, our lifetime, we've been the world's reserve currency.
	We've had the semblance of stability in that currency unit, but I think that is rapidly disappearing.
	You can see how just, look, gold was $1,800 an ounce.
	quarter of last year.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, it's 24.
	It's close to $2,400 an ounce and the price for premiums on physical gold or even higher.
	So I want to caution your audiences to pay attention to this.
	I don't think this is this has very little to do with the actual markets like it's a hot market and there's things going to stocks are up or down.
	This is really outside of that, in my opinion.
	I think that was the interesting thing we saw last week.
	You know, we saw the stock market get affected by this.
	We saw Bitcoin get affected by it.
	But we didn't see gold get affected by it.
	That's the tell. The Bitcoin ETFs, and of course there's a halving coming up.
	Here in a few days, basically every four years, the price cuts in half of what is rewarded for miners.
	That's called a Bitcoin halving.
	So there's a little price pullback before then.
	But Bitcoin ETFs, there's a lot of the outflows into those ETFs have slowed.
	Everything's slowed down. The market slowed down across the board, but gold kept climbing.
	It kept going and staying steady.
	Right now, I'm looking at green across the board of gold and silver.
	Silver's finally starting to have It's day, I think.
	And I know people have been following silver for years.
	It's just so boring. It doesn't move.
	I think that's a good thing.
	Honestly, it's kind of an inversion of actual value.
	But I think there's going to be a deficit this year.
	David, talking about silver, there's going to be a deficit of close to 200 million ounces.
	They've been running deficits for years now of the actual above ground stock versus what gets put into the actual circulation and what is the demand for physical silver.
	We're seeing a disparity there.
	A lot of things happening.
	And again, it's not going to end well for those who control the dollar system.
	And I think that's going to affect us.
	And one of the ways that I'm preparing for it is to stay outside of that system, stay out as best as possible, have things that are without counterparty risk like gold and Yeah, absolutely. No matter what they do with interest rates, what I was saying earlier in the program, one of the guys with one of the big Tea Party organizations was saying, look, when Obama came in in 2009, we had a $10 billion deficit.
	Now it's $34 trillion.
	So just think of it as these guys stealing your credit card, you know, and you had $10 on your credit card, and now you get it back after Obama, Trump, and Biden stole your credit card and used it for several years.
	Now they run up a $34,000 bill on the credit card that you only had $10 on when they stole it.
	And that's what's going on, and that's the thing that swamps any of these...
	You know, manipulations that they're doing in terms of interest rates because there's so many other things that they're doing as well, like the sanctions, that also mitigate against the dollar as well.
	It truly is amazing. And then when you look at inflation, Biden is out there saying, you know, they're handing subsidies to companies to try to get manufacturing here.
	He wants to go up significantly on tariffs for steel coming from China.
	He wants to triple them.
	Trump wants to do the same type of thing, but that's not really, they're not getting to the root cause of it.
	Why is our steel more expensive than It's not just labor costs.
	Even more important than the labor costs are the energy costs.
	And they've shut down the last steel plant in the UK a couple of months ago because they can't compete with China.
	China gets cheap, dirty energy.
	We get virtually no energy.
	They call it clean. And we get incredibly expensive bills.
	And so we can't compete with them.
	And it's really amazing to see somebody like Biden who has absolutely no respect for individual liberty, has no understanding or comprehension of free markets.
	He thinks that he can fix all this stuff, that he can make our electricity, our energy incredibly rare and expensive, and then solve it by putting tariffs on China.
	It's just crazy.
	And I'm thinking about the Chinese steel markets, which was fledgling in the 1990s.
	It was December 11, 2001, when George W. Bush gave China the most favored trading status and entered him into the WTO. And after that, we lost 55,000 factories and one in three manufacturing jobs.
	And of course, it didn't help. They got a lot of free steel from Rudolph Giuliani giving all the World Trade Center steel to China, getting there as fast as possible after 9-11.
	So I'm sure that helped a lot.
	Get some steel back into their coffers.
	That is a part of the program to de-industrialize the United States, and there'll be some political back and forth, and we can put a tariff up, which I think tariffs work.
	I mean, all four presidents on Mount Rushmore agreed on tariffs.
	the figures on our paper currency from the $1 bill to the $100 bill all agreed on tariffs.
	Free trade really is mostly a fantasy because if every nation on earth had economic parity then free trade would work, but unfortunately what you do is you incentivize companies, multinationals to leave their country of origin, go somewhere else and export it and push it into that market because they don't want to have to deal with regulations and taxes and any sort of environmental concerns.
	And it's like a Darwinian contest you throw these workers into and our leaders, again so-called leaders, I don't think they even understand what I just said.
	I mean, you talk about NAFTA, Ross Perot said it was going to be a giant sucking sound.
	Yeah, pretty much, and that's what it did.
	Millions and millions of jobs.
	You look at the profits of multinational corporations after NAFTA, it's up and to the right, and wages for average Americans is stagnant or down.
	And, of course, when you add inflation to that, David, and the loss of purchasing power of your dollar, We really are becoming a nation where it's a ruling class of have and have-nots.
	And the middle class is dissipating.
	All that by design, though.
	There's always going to be countries that compete with us, but why don't we compete here?
	The answer is not necessarily going after one nation at all.
	Like, and that's the thing is I thought that targeted tariffs really are kind of a more of an act of war than they are any sort of economic strategy.
	I mean, if you're just singling out one particular nation, you know, Pat Buchanan, just if we're on the subject of tariffs and you know, if you want to look at something that actually would work, if you put a 25% tariff across the board on all incoming manufacturing, just across the board, anything manufacturing 25% tariff across the board and eliminated the corporate income tax, the internal and corporate income tax, you would incentivize companies to move here, put their factories here, employ, employ Americans, and that would be revenue
	Not that anybody cares about revenue anymore.
	I don't even think that's studied.
	That's right. But that's one way you could do it.
	I don't think that targeting a certain country is the way to go, and of course, I don't think they think that's the way to go either.
	This is a lot of posturing.
	Okay. Welcome to my show!
	And that's going to be as big as these other things, perhaps as big as them combined, the fact that they have this big advantage in energy.
	And so he's not going to do anything to address that.
	Instead, what he's going to do by tripling tariffs on a particular product from a particular country, what he's going to do is this kind of a virtue signaling process Like Newsom, increasing the minimum wage for people who work at certain types of fast food restaurants, right? That's what they do.
	And we know that that doesn't help anybody.
	It's followed by layoffs, reduced hours, a lot of other things like that, and inflation.
	And so all this stuff is going to be followed by that as well.
	And so all these traditional things are back and they're back and you know, they're coming back at us big time you know the the Embargoes on oil and the higher energy and all the rest of the stuff and all these other aspects of inflation that they've built in With the low interest rates and quantitative easing and printing of money and all that kind of stuff But now there's other things that are out there and that's you know, that's also what bothers me
	I'm looking at biometric terminals that are coming out with EU regulations.
	They call it pay-by-face.
	And they want to get rid of cash.
	They also want to get rid of credit cards, everything.
	It's about you. You will be the thing that they track.
	You will be part of the Internet of Things.
	And so I'm looking and I've been looking at gold for a long time.
	It's just this thing that is outside of their system.
	Something that is physical, something that is decentralized, that's not under their direct control.
	And to me, that is as important as all these other economic issues that are starting to come home to roost as well.
	I agree with that 100%.
	For some reason, that made me laugh at the biometrics and using your face.
	There's a funny show called Eastbound and Down.
	He said, this face used to cash checks.
	He was like a disgraced former baseball player.
	He used to cash checks. And I think that that's going to be part of our future.
	And again, it could be just all the controlled demolition to bring in the central bank digital currency.
	It's It really is an open question.
	Are these people that stupid?
	They have to have more sophisticated simulations that they're running, doing the math, trying to add up.
	Like, when do we reach, like, a point of no return?
	They have to have that somewhere in some underground think tank saying, well, when you hit this number, there has to be a number in which everything falls apart and they have to do some sort of reset.
	And, of course, they use that language.
	It's a great reset. And I think more and more of the financial networks, you're starting to see chatter all over the place talking about a monetary reset.
	And when you're talking, you mentioned getting outside of the system.
	David, this has nothing to do with investment anymore.
	Yeah. And I've talked to people all day long, and I said, look, you know, there's people like Robert Kiyosaki, who I've followed since my early 20s.
	He's calling for, he'll sometimes say it's $300,000 of Bitcoin, but he's also saying, look, gold could crash to $1,200 an ounce.
	It could crash because so much of this is fake.
	How much of the paper, how much of it's tied to nothing?
	And we don't know.
	And so I think you're going to have to see a lot of this just come out into the wash.
	And look back at the first quarter of 2020.
	Gold went to like $1,100 an ounce, $1,200 an ounce.
	Silver was like $1,200, $1,300.
	You couldn't get it for that, but I am cautioning people.
	I don't think this is some kind of like investment rally.
	I think what you're watching is something a lot more sinister.
	It's something very deep.
	It's much more deep than that.
	It's not about markets.
	It's about a complete change of the global order.
	That's right. That's what you're looking at.
	And so when people call me and say, you know, what's going to go up?
	I don't know. I really don't know.
	I don't know what's going to go up.
	I do know where the dollar's going.
	It's going to digital, and it's going to lose whatever current status it has right now.
	Every day that passes, there's more news that comes out that countries are moving away, dumping the dollar.
	Again, let's go back to this.
	The Federal Reserve lost money.
	The people that make the money lost almost a trillion dollars.
	I mean, this is insane.
	So you can't trust that system.
	The mere fact that they can't...
	I go over this again and again.
	The mere fact that they can't do anything to affect the price of gold...
	Raising, lowering, hinting, it doesn't matter.
	It's on its own now.
	It's become organic.
	It's outside of their control.
	And you have to remember the dollar inherently since 1971 is at war with gold.
	They've done, they did a pretty good job by the way of covering that up for a long time.
	They went after, in my opinion, it's my opinion, they went after the Hunt family in the early 1980s to make sure that nobody cornered the silver market again.
	That exposes them because it's not that hard to corner the physical silver market.
	I mean, you could, you have a little, if you're, if you're an Elon Musk type or somebody, even, you know, a billionaire, you could corner the silver market.
	It's not that hard.
	They exposed that, and so they shut that down because it made the price of silver start really going up at $52.50 an ounce in 1980.
	So nobody did that, and then gold cratered in the 1980s because it was morning in America, and you had Art Laffer and the Laffer curve, and they're going to stimulate the economy through deficit spending and all this other stuff.
	And so it looked like that era was over.
	Well, until it's not.
	And then you've spent too much.
	Again, it's a trillion dollars every 100 days.
	So, in my opinion, I think that entire system is coming apart.
	They're going to have to reset somehow.
	Their war with gold, it's continuing.
	I don't know what they're going to do about it, but every time the gold goes up, you see this crate.
	I wouldn't have predicted these prices six months ago.
	I didn't say that. I mean, I thought we'd be in the $2,000, maybe $2,100 range.
	But to break into the $2,400, that's something.
	$2,400 is something that I don't think even some of the most bullish analysts were saying that we were going to be in here at this stage in 2024, David.
	So something else is afoot.
	I agree. Yeah, I also talked about the Tea Party organization guy earlier.
	We were talking about how it's out of control.
	And he's saying, you know, when you look at Trump, he looks at it like from the standpoint of a businessman.
	He says, well, if you go bankrupt, you just declare bankruptcy and you start all over again.
	Well, you can't do that with the country.
	But he didn't address, so what happens when the country is bankrupt?
	What happens when we can't service the debt, for example?
	And what happens is they completely reset the financial system.
	That's where he stopped. He didn't talk about that.
	And how do they do that? Well, they just completely wiped that out.
	Here's the next new thing.
	How do they force people in it?
	I've got an article I haven't covered here where somebody was talking about, well, maybe it's going to be through the food supply.
	Maybe it'll be through some kind of bird flu pandemic.
	Because they're going to start registering all the backyard chickens and anything else like that that people have in the UK beginning in September.
	They're telling everybody, we've got this bird flu pandemic that's going on right now.
	It's really serious. But, you know, in three months, or six months, I should say.
	Six months was when they said it.
	In six months, we're going to start registering all this stuff.
	It's like, well, if it's serious, why don't you do it now?
	Same type of iterative, gradual control that we saw throughout the COVID pandemic.
	They're going to start doing that as well.
	And so I said, well, so what happens when they go in and they say, well, we've got to kill all the chickens and everything.
	Now everybody's starving.
	That's going to be a very effective weapon to try to force people into their currency, right?
	I'll trade all this for food.
	And so when I look at gold, or when I look at backyard chickens, or when I look at solar that is off of their grid, You know, I don't like solar being used as an input into the grid, but I like it as a system that's off to the side that gives you independence from the grid.
	You know, you look at all those things, and they can be very expensive, and it's like, well, why would I bother to have chickens when I just go buy chickens?
	Go buy eggs at the grocery store.
	The same thing with the power.
	Why would I spend more money for a solar system than this other stuff?
	Because you're preparing for what you think is going to come along.
	And that's the real issue.
	As we're saying here, that's above and beyond all of these financial problems that are coming home to roost.
	And that is, you know, what this control mechanism that I think they're going to try to get this done by 2029.
	I think it's all going to happen in the next presidential term, regardless of which one of these clowns gets a second term.
	Absolutely. Wasn't it like 180 different fires or planes flying into food distribution points?
	Two different planes, maybe three.
	Certainly there's a lot of coincidences.
	So many coincidences.
	So many coincidences.
	You have Kilgates buying up all the farmland.
	Yeah. I saw a meme the other day and I thought it was great.
	I think it was depicting the Revolutionary War.
	Maybe it was Boston era, 1770s.
	It had somebody getting tarred and feathered.
	And it said, we need to make tax collectors birds again.
	It reminded me of that, thinking about the backyard chickens.
	You know, they will do that.
	I mean, and I think all the test models from COVID-1984 were, what will people comply?
	And we found that out.
	All you have to do is give them a Trump figure and say, he's on your side, he's playing 4D chess.
	That'll neutralize the people that generally would stand up to it.
	And you were so right this morning.
	You'd be so angry if this was Hillary Clinton.
	You'd be so angry if this was Barack Obama, but you're not.
	And that's the mind control here.
	And that's why... We live in a world where what you just said could become a reality, where they start going after anybody who's producing on their own, trying to get you under the guise of, we have a bird flu outbreak for our own food supply, and we're in this together. They're going after any semblance of independence, and people would roll over.
	I think a large portion of them would.
	And again, not everyone, and there's a lot of people that are more awake, but we're We're caught in an election year and it means nothing.
	It means nothing.
	In my opinion, I pay attention to it in politics anymore for Sun Tzu's maximum of know your enemy.
	This is mind control.
	It's psychological warfare.
	That's why I pay attention to it.
	But no, you're right, David.
	Well, we know our enemy has made their plans clear.
	They've even given us a rough time frame in which they want to do it.
	Time frame where they want to ban cars and ban other things and all the rest of this stuff.
	But you know, when you look at a situation like Amos Miller, for example, right, a local or state government can make it worse or they can make it better.
	So what we can do is, and I think it is something people really need to think about, and that is to make sure that you've got things that are outside of their system, food, energy, wealth, and things like that, like gold or silver that is outside of their system.
	And then of course, make sure at the local level that you've got people who are not going to be worse than the criminals at the top.
	These people have taken over our government.
	But you've got people who are going to somewhat stand against that, even if they just passively don't comply.
	You know if you got people like that and you've made some preparations that that's kind of the best that you can do on a material secular basis, you know certainly You know having a connection with God is going to give you a foundation there That's going to take you through whatever comes but from a secular material Perspective I think the best you can do is prepare individually and then from the election standpoint If you can find any good candidates that are that you can support
	That's good, and if you can't get out of that state Tell people I do think that there will be better and better candidates on local level ballots as we move forward.
	It'll be a natural progression because it takes a while.
	I mean, the things that we're talking about are years out from being in the consciousness of Of the average, even conservative person that listens to talk radio.
	We're way ahead of that.
	And again, they might catch up.
	They might not. But I think a good portion of them will.
	I mean, places like Texas will have.
	Just because of the sheer fact that everything's being exposed.
	You have people like Greg Abbott bussing up illegal aliens to Martha's Vineyard for political stunts or taking them to sanctuary cities and ignoring his duty.
	which is to secure the border in which the state he governs.
	And he has the duty, he has the ability, he has the power to do that.
	And he's tasked to do that. He does not do it. And that's the Republican party in a nutshell.
	He'll do anything but. He'll run any stunt. He'll try to score any points that he can.
	But I think that runs out. And again, when it becomes so bad, people just have to figure out another way. There has to be some sort of valve for that.
	And there will be. There'll be better and better candidates. But it's going to take, unfortunately, the way things work. It has to get worse before it gets better. And so I think just right now is a good time to prepare for change. And one of the best ways you can do that is having backyard chickens. I love that idea.
	I've got backyard chickens, love chickens. They produce eggs. They have something, you know, looking at having precious metals, crypto currencies, anything that's outside of the system. Cash, you know, having a little bit of cash on hand is always good. I mean, I know I'm in the precious metals business, but I think there's a multi pronged way.
	To just be in a better position for when things get a little bit more weird, I believe.
	Yeah, and you know, it can be a little bit difficult to find good people, but a lot of times, if it's somebody that's really good, the Eye of Sauron will find them and identify them for you as well.
	You've got somebody who just speaks up at a school board meeting.
	You know, the ISR focuses on them.
	That tells you right there, you know, we know that politics is local.
	And they know it as well.
	And so, you know, they're going to focus.
	If you see somebody who really gets the eyeball of Sauron on them, pay attention to that person.
	And a lot of times those people will move on to run for office.
	We got the guy who's running for governor now in North Carolina.
	He was, he got elected as lieutenant governor last time.
	He's got no background in politics.
	He's got nothing at all in his resume that would get him to be lieutenant governor, governor, except that he stood up and took these people on in a public forum over guns and over some other issues like that.
	And that made him a folk hero.
	And he's got just general good common sense, I think.
	So now he's running for governor.
	So sometimes, you know, they focus on somebody like that and all the next you know they're lieutenant governor and next thing you know they're running for governor.
	That type of thing can happen.
	And so, you know, people can focus on that.
	But tell us a little bit about what's going on with this crazy gold market.
	What's going on with Wise Wolf?
	A lot of exciting things going on.
	Well, I tell you what, if things get worse, I might just run again just for the fun of it, to follow one of these establishment guys around and make their brain melt, you know, just like having to face these issues.
	Politicians don't like it when you actually know more than they do, and they don't like having to answer questions.
	You know, what we're doing here, and just coming off of, I flew back from California, I was out on Tinfoil Hat, which was a lot of fun, and we promoted Wolfpack there, and Sam Tripoli is somebody we love to sponsor, and they're spreading this around, so we're helping more people.
	We've grown the pack significantly.
	We passed over 1,000 members this last week, which that has been my goal for so long.
	I could get so close, but we wouldn't hit it.
	We finally hit 1,000.
	So we have 1,000 members across the country.
	As you mentioned, most of the country now, the states have no sales tax on gold and silver bullion.
	And so that's great for us.
	Yeah, I talked about that yesterday. 45 states now have, the latest one was Kentucky, overrode the veto from Andy Beshear, this horrible Democrat governor, one of the worst.
	He's almost up to the level of Whitmer during the pandemic.
	So he fought that.
	But they overrode that.
	And there's only five left, and one of them is New Jersey.
	I think they'll probably do something to help Bob Menendez with his gold bars there.
	So... That might be a shoo-in there as well.
	I've got a question for you from a listener.
	Michelle Obama asks you if you can explain the Nevada Goldbacks.
	Who makes them and how do they work?
	Well, there's Nevada, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Utah.
	These states, respectively, have a gold back made by a mint there that the state approves of, and these are 24-karat gold notes.
	As a matter of fact, I was looking at Gold Telegraph's Twitter today, and Dubai has a new note from the government.
	It's a 24-karat note.
	There's going to be other countries that do this.
	It's approximately like.01 gram or something in each note.
	So if you take that note and you melt it, you're going to get that amount of gold.
	So you're walking around with not just a gold bar, but it's 24 karat gold spread over this gold.
	I wish I should have had one on hand.
	I'd go get one. And they don't have a dollar denomination on them because it's always changing, right?
	It'll be measured in...
	Yeah, they have denominations, but it's basically measured in how much gold is in there.
	So they go from like one to five to tens.
	And so you'll have a little bit thicker note.
	As it goes up what wolfpack does what I did David is I just bought the one Denominations the singles and and I just spread it over the different states So I get all the different states with the one denominations and we put those in every single Wolfpack so if it even one denomination is that is it marked as $1 is it marked as one, you know some It's marked as like a dollar, but that's not what it means.
	It's kind of like how the American Silver Eagles marked as a dollar.
	Yeah, exactly. Yeah, yeah.
	Or dimes or things like that.
	You know, they have a nominal value.
	It's not translatable.
	Again, you're going to be looking at what the conversion rate of that is.
	And you can look at some of the online retailers.
	Like JM Bullion and others, they list them for like, I think they're in the mid $6.50 range if you buy them with a credit card or something like that.
	And we're under the five range for them when we put them in Wolfpack.
	And they're not cheap.
	Right. They're not cheap, and there's only a few places that you can get them.
	But I think there's going to be more and more of a future for them.
	It's not the best way to invest in gold, but it's a great way to have something outside of the system for trading, for bartering, for smaller items.
	As a matter of fact, I was going to tell you, one of the things that I've been telling people right now is if you're able to get gold and hold it for the long term, one of the best things you can do is buy fractional gold, in my opinion, because Again, we're looking at the gold price.
	If you're able to get 10-ounce gold coins, that's about the size of a dime.
	You can get 10-ounce gold coins right now and hold them.
	You've got a divisible...
	There's a trading piece that you can use that actually could be like, this is a week's worth of groceries, and it's in a dime size, instead of being in a one-ounce coin.
	So if you can hold it for the long term, and that's one of the great things about Wolfpack, is we save you a significant amount on items like that, whether it's a tenth ounce, and I say one-tenth, one-tenth of an ounce bar or coin.
	We usually start putting those in the Wise Wolves, which is the 500 and up.
	You start getting gold in the Alpha, which is the 250.
	That's the gram bars.
	But some of the best ways to get fractional gold is through Wolfpack right now, and I'm doing an infomercial, but that's one of the best ways because we buy them in bulk and then beat the other online retailers significantly.
	Yeah, so I think, you know, when we're talking about these goldbacks and stuff, you just kind of think of them like you would a Kennedy half dollar.
	That's not worth 50 cents anymore.
	That's right. I used to have a lot of those.
	And if we go back to having something that's like gold that's the size of a dime and buy a week's worth of groceries, you go back to where it was when my parents were kids, where they could actually get a week's worth of groceries for a dime.
	Somebody put up a meme the other day.
	I wanted to correct them, but I didn't have the heart.
	But they just got it wrong on what the bar was.
	It should have been like 10 ounce bars of gold.
	It says like 10 of these...
	Would have bought you a median-priced home in the 1920s.
	And then it shows in today's world, it says, 10 of these will buy you a median-priced home in the 2000s and 24s.
	Yes, because gold just held its value.
	It's the currency that was separated from that value and then used, you know, over and over again and printed into oblivion that's debased itself.
	And so, yeah, if you just, as a store of value, gold's just a good thing to have.
	Silver's a good thing to have. I think silver is so undervalued, and we hit a little bit on that today, but it's It's going to be like 200 million ounces deficit this year on above-ground supplies versus demand.
	I think there's a lot of reckoning happening in the commodities markets, and we're trying to prepare for that.
	The prices are moving all over the place, but we're definitely meeting the challenge, I think, Dave.
	Well, that's great. And, of course, you can get to Tony.
	Go to davidknight.gold, and I'll take you to Wise Wolf Gold.
	He's now got over 1,000 people with Wolfpack, so you get in with that buying group, and that helps you to buy smaller quantities and get a better price on smaller quantities because you're part of the bigger group there.
	But he can handle gold or silver orders at any size.
	So I've known Tony for a long time.
	I've seen articles this last week, Tony, where they say, well, the key thing is now everybody's jumping into gold thing, and everybody's paying attention to it.
	So there's going to be some scammers out there.
	Make sure you're dealing with somebody that has been around for a while that you know.
	That's the key thing. So thank you so much for what you do for us.
	Thank you for your support. And you've got a program that's coming up after this program, don't you?
	Yes, sir. I'll be at 11 a.m.
	Central Time, Arterburn Radio Transmission, Rockfin.
	I'll be live on FreeWorld.fm and my Twitter.
	Come join me over there. All right.
	Sounds great. Thanks again, Tony.
	and folks will be right back. Stay with us.
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at All right, welcome back.
	As I was talking before about the pandemic, and I do want to get back to this, because this is an article I see happening everywhere.
	Rand Paul has made the rounds with Tucker Carlson.
	He's being focused on by pretty much every conservative media.
	This was penned all day yesterday at Zero Hedge.
	Headline, we have 15,000 samples in Wuhan.
	Could do full genomes of 700 COVIDs.
	Rand Paul drops a COVID bombshell.
	Now, all of that is fine, and I have opposed since 2014, and what woke me up to what was happening with this stuff was Allison Young's series of articles on USA Today about accidents down at the Tulane National Primate Center, but then she saw this is happening all over the place.
	We've got 200 or so of these labs that are affiliated with universities, biosafety level 3 and biosafety level 4, 4 being the highest.
	You know, the most dangerous stuff that they're working with.
	And all these different accidents where they've got infected animals with very serious diseases escaping from the lab, where you've got the disease being found outside of the lab, which is what happened in Tulane, the primate center.
	People who go down there from the CDC to investigate it, one of them got sick, and they say, oh, it wasn't from this.
	It must have been a prior exposure.
	Things like that. People who are working in the labs, having faulty equipment and getting exposed to it, and then they could pass this on to other people.
	So these things are not only a waste of money, but they're very dangerous, and following those stories, it got a lot of attention, and it was picked up by Congress, and they told Fauci, stop it.
	They told Francis Collins, stop it.
	And so then they started continuing to do that in China.
	Continued to do it even at the University of North Carolina, one of the domestic labs that they continued to do it in defiance of Congress.
	Ukraine, other places like that where they're running this stuff.
	I do not support gain-of-function research, but folks, this is a red herring.
	And I say that because Rand never talks about the jab.
	He never talks about the ventilators.
	He never talks about remdesivir.
	He invests in remdesivir.
	He said these officials knew the Chinese lab was proposing to create a COVID-19-like virus, and not one of these officials revealed this scheme to the public.
	In fact, 15 agencies with knowledge of this project have continuously refused to release any information concerning this alarming and dangerous research.
	Well, I'm glad that they failed.
	And they did fail. Because as I pointed out before, the excess deaths began with the vaccine.
	The vaccine is the bioweapon.
	And to continue to talk about this lab in Wuhan is a deliberate political ploy.
	It is a deliberate red herring.
	And it really gets me out.
	He won't talk about the jab.
	He won't talk about Trump.
	And he wants to give cover to all the people who participated in this.
	That's what's really going on.
	And so, as I was talking to Tony, this article out of Exposé News, we have, will a false bird flu pandemic be the end of animal agriculture?
	And will it be used to usher in food rationing?
	And also, CBDC, right?
	Sorry, we don't have any more food.
	But we'll give you some food if you've got this code.
	You remember, anybody who's familiar at all with the Bible knows the story about the massive famine and Joseph and how he got in on the good side of Pharaoh and told him that coming up there's going to be...
	Seven years of plenty and then seven years of famine and that type of thing.
	And so Pharaoh put him in charge and he stored all this stuff up.
	And then in order to survive, people had to come and, you know, they were the only ones with any food.
	And they had to buy the food from them.
	And after a while, nobody had anything left and they sold themselves into slavery.
	This, I believe, is what they want to do.
	And the overhyped threat of a human bird flu pandemic is a hoax.
	To reset our food system, argues Alexis Baden-Mare in a substack.
	And I agree with that.
	I think it is a hoax.
	I think it is another one of these things.
	We've got all these coincidences, as Tony was talking about, of accidents at places where there's a lot of food being produced.
	We've had the biggest fire I've ever had, I think, in Texas, where most of the cattle was.
	Burning up cattle, burning up the grasslands where they feed them.
	It's just amazing to see how much of our food infrastructure is being taken out by quote-unquote accidents over and over and over again.
	And then there's the fear. Every year now, this bird flu coming out and killing millions, tens of millions of birds everywhere, shooting the price of eggs up, shooting the price of chicken up, and all the rest of this stuff.
	And you have to ask yourself, you know, what are they practicing?
	Because they do practice this stuff.
	And they do create an expectation with people.
	Oh yeah, that bird flu thing, that's been getting worse every year, isn't it?
	Now it's just taking out everything.
	Yeah. Moving the Overton window.
	You know, people's minds.
	They move the window so they can defenestrate us.
	So they can throw us out the window.
	They are going to throw us out the Overton window.
	You know, that's the plan.
	The response to bird flu outbreaks has so far been to kill healthy birds en masse.
	There will come a time when the only alternative to the mass culling of birds will be to vaccinate them.
	And we'll have to have all the, you know, all the birds have to be vaccinated.
	And we'll have to kill all the birds that aren't vaccinated, or they're going to say, right?
	Because even if they, this is the other thing that they've built the expectation for with everybody.
	Your vaccine doesn't protect you.
	It protects other people.
	See, if, that's what we always used to say about measles and stuff like that.
	It's like, okay, well, if you think it works and you think it's the right thing for you, go ahead and get it.
	I would tell you otherwise, but you don't have to listen to me.
	I'm not your doctor, and I'm not arguing that government should keep you from getting a measles vaccine or an MMR vaccine.
	I'll talk to you about autism.
	I'll talk about the harmful adjuvants that they put into it and all these other things and how you don't really need to take that risk.
	But they won't go with that.
	No, no. Everybody has to get vaccinated.
	It's like, no, if your vaccine works, you're protected.
	They have used that now for such a long time that it's very easy for them to sell the idea, well, I could get my COVID shot, but I'm still going to get sick if you don't get a COVID shot.
	I can wear my mask, but I'm still going to get sick if you don't wear a mask.
	And they're going to use the same thing.
	You know, your chickens are going to have to be, if you've got backyard chickens, you better register them with us, and you better get them vaccinated.
	Because if you don't, your backyard chickens will kill our chickens.
	I got an idea.
	We'll just outlaw all backyard chickens.
	How about that? That'd be better, right?
	So the people who run the vaccines, the big pharmaceutical companies, will be their partner in all this.
	Creating food shortages could result in food rationing, which would then be the easiest way for them to get people to adopt the digital IDs linked to the CBDCs.
	Things get bad enough, you literally sell yourself into slavery, like everybody did at the time of Joseph.
	And they've already planned this, as I said, you know, in March, they were saying, come September, in the UK, you're going to have to register your backyard chickens.
	So they sub-stack by Lexus Baden-Meyer.
	All the hype about whether the bird flu will become a human pandemic might just be a distraction.
	There are certainly pharmaceutical companies that would benefit from a human bird flu pandemic, but the industry might make even more money preventing a human pandemic by vaccinating farm animals, especially the world's 33 billion chickens.
	Yeah, they could sell more vaccines.
	If there's a vaccine, if there's a shot for every chicken, they can make, you know, sell more units of that than if there's a shot for every human being.
	We've only got about, what, 8 billion people, but we've got 33 billion chickens.
	So far, the government's response to the bird flu has been to kill millions of chickens.
	85.9 million birds killed since 2022.
	And so it's become an annual ritual, frankly.
	We've got to kill healthy birds.
	When you look at what happened in Norway with the lockdowns, Brownstone Institute has the article, A Retrospective of the Norway Lockdowns.
	History has never seen anything like the globally coordinated lockdowns.
	This is what I've always... And as a matter of fact, when I talked about this ridiculous...
	Saying Fauci didn't do it.
	Guess who did it? You know, watch my little 25-minute video, and I'll tell you that it wasn't Fauci.
	And, of course, we know it can't be Trump.
	It could never be Trump.
	That's unthinkable that it could be Trump.
	It's unthinkable that it could be the guy who was in charge, the guy who appointed these people, who left them in place, and who left not only Fauci, but left Birx in place as well.
	No, it's got to be several levels down.
	And I said, this is ridiculous.
	This is globally coordinated.
	Everybody was doing the same thing in every country, every Western country.
	So to say that it's Birx, you know, it's not.
	You know, the presidents and leaders, you know, Trudeau and Trump are responsible, but they're not the ones who are running it.
	There are people above them.
	Part of the global governance that's already in place that was running it.
	It was globally coordinated lockdowns of mid-March 2020, all at exactly the same time, doing exactly the same thing, with nearly every nation in the world simultaneously jettisoning its laws and its liberties in favor of an experiment without precedent, one without a clear goal or an exit strategy.
	Well, the only place where I disagree with that The Brownstone Institute.
	It did have precedent, and it did have a clear goal, and it did have a clear strategy to exit.
	The strategy to exit it was the jab, and they even said that.
	And, of course, that was what they had practiced from dark winter two months before 9-11.
	For 20 years, they'd practiced this.
	We're going to lock everybody down, create a fast vaccine, an emergency thing, and everybody's going to have to take that to get out of lockdown.
	So that was the precedent.
	These games that they practiced for 20 years, that was the exit strategy, and that was the goal.
	The goal was not just to vaccinate and kill people with a vaccine.
	The goal was to establish the political power to do that as well.
	But it is interesting to see what's going on with the Norwegian lockdowns.
	And I'm glad that they pointed out that it was March 2020, everywhere, every nation, that did this at the same time, simultaneously.
	So the Norwegian Commission pointed out that scenarios for serious influenza pandemics had already been drawn up in their country as well.
	Isn't that interesting? But not even for their worst case scenario, with up to 23,000 dead Norwegians, were the dramatic measures that we experienced under the so-called corona pandemic.
	They didn't even recommend that stuff for their games.
	So they were wargaming about an influenza epidemic, just like the United States was.
	But unlike the United States wargames...
	They're wargaming, even if they had 23,000 dead Norwegians, which is, you know, they have much, much, much smaller population than we do.
	I don't know what percentage that is.
	But even with that, they would not roll out these things.
	But we would. You know, we did have that in all of these germ games.
	Dark winter on. So why was Norway shut down on the 12th of March, 2020?
	I tell you, you know, you look at the time frame differentials and everything, it's almost exactly the same hour that we do our stuff.
	On the 16th of March 2020, the Imperial College of London published an article which recommended a knock-down strategy.
	Based on computer models.
	But, of course, they had already had the other computer model that was about lockdown.
	And it was a preprint of that that Trump said two very smart people, meaning Fauci and Birx, showed this to me.
	So that's why I did it on the 13th.
	On the 24th of March, the Norwegian government announced that it had switched to a knockdown strategy where the goal was that every infected person would infect fewer than one person.
	Their initial simulation was that every person would infect two or more, two to two and a half people, and it would do it forever.
	As I've said many times, the fundamental model that the Imperial College of London had was in denial of everything that epidemiologists had ever seen with any kind of a disease outbreak.
	The reason we talked about flatten the curve was because there was a curve that associated with every kind of outbreak.
	I mean, whether it is cholera, Whether it was chicken pox or whatever, they would always have this bell-shaped curve.
	And that goes back to the 1830s.
	A guy named Farr identified that.
	And so the curve was called Farr's Law.
	But their model didn't have that.
	You know, it was like, we're going to infect, every person that gets infected is going to infect another two and a half people forever.
	And so then they came up with another one a few days later.
	Well, the goal is that an infected person will infect fewer than one person.
	So if it's fewer than one, it's just like our reproduction thing.
	You know, if you have less than...
	Slightly over two children per child-bearing woman, your population is going to continue to go away very rapidly.
	So that's what they're looking at with a virus.
	That was going to be their goal.
	According to the Director of Health in Norway, the Imperial College report changed the way of thinking for the entire Western world.
	The commission that is looking at this now, in retrospect in Norway, and you do have some of these commissions, there's an inquiry going on in the UK, in Norway, some other places like this, and a lot of times these commissions or these inquiries are done like the JFK assassination thing.
	It's just there to do a cover-up.
	Many times that's the case.
	Many times even if they come up with a recommendation, that'll be ignored.
	You had a commission that was put together after they had ClimateGate, which began in the UK at the University of East Anglia.
	And there were damaging admissions as these emails were released.
	We've got to hide the decline.
	Our models are not working, on and on.
	So they put together this commission, and the public was really upset about that.
	The purpose of the commission was to tell people, oh, that's okay.
	It really is still a real problem.
	And that was, you know, what they did was a propaganda move.
	To do a cover-up of how these people are rigging the data and to assure the public that this climate alarmism was real and justified.
	So, this commission is critical of the way in which the decision was taken in the closure of the 12th of March 2020.
	It appears the Directorate of Health made this decision.
	Brownstone says the commission points out that this should have been made by the government.
	Well, not even the government should have that kind of power to do that.
	And they say the Commission believes the government should have made more thorough assessments against the Constitution and against human rights.
	In the Infection Control Act in Norway, proportionality is a central concept.
	So what they're saying is they overreacted, to put it mildly.
	And so you have to keep this in proportion.
	And as other people have said, and it needs to be repeated all the time, the Constitution doesn't go away when there's a virus out there or a disease or something like that going around.
	It doesn't go away. Except they have now essentially established that.
	The Commission criticizes the government for having exercised too strong a central control.
	And, of course, we know how they do that here in the U.S. It's done with the money.
	It's done via money. It's done via plans that were long laid in the state.
	That is exactly how they run this stuff through.
	So, they finish up the article at Brownstone saying, in my opinion, it seems obvious that the authorities' pandemic management was an ethical, social, and economic abuse of the population, albeit to a lesser extent in Norway than in many other countries.
	And it must never happen again.
	Well, except they were going to have a second term of the two guys that did it.
	Right? One of these two guys that did this to us, we're going to give them a second term.
	And everybody's whipped up in such a frenzy that we imagine it'd just be the end of the world if one of these guys doesn't get elected for us.
	I mean, you know, the people who support Biden, if Trump gets elected, that's the end of everything.
	The people who support Trump, if Biden gets elected, that's the end of everything.
	These two people were responsible for the end of everything.
	Pretty close to it. And in their second term, That'll be what they're working on.
	The end of everything.
	If the question is, not who are you going to vote for for president, but who does the eye and the pentagram want for president?
	Who do they think is going to be their most useful puppet to get this stuff run through?
	That's the real issue.
	That's what this is really about.
	There's no election except at the local level.
	You need to understand where this really is.
	Part of that, when we talk about the pandemic, part of that is universal basic income, of course.
	And there's been several articles picked up.
	Actually, I'll come back to an article from Stateline by Kevin Hardy talking about how conservative states are pushing back against UBI. And they kind of quote...
	Uh, one guy, uh, in, um, North or South Dakota, he says, you know, I don't like to introduce a lot of laws.
	He's my kind of legislator.
	I'm not one who's always introducing laws, but I try to look and see trends that are out on the horizon, what's happening in these other places that are bad and try to prevent it.
	And we got a lot of people like that here in Tennessee, frankly.
	And, um, yeah, Frank, nicely, frankly, looking at stuff like that and other people as well.
	And that's a good thing. They're proactive.
	They see the stuff coming. And sometimes they shut it down even before it hits the state.
	But when we look at universal income, this is something that was sold by Bloomberg when he was running for president.
	He said, look, and everybody got upset with him because you just dissed and disrespected farmers.
	You called them stupid. Well, he was saying, you know, we used to have everybody doing farming and we replaced that and we got everybody working in factories.
	And now the smart people like me, the smart ones of us are working to take everybody's jobs.
	And we just got to figure out how we are going to keep these people from who've lost their job and lost their income, lost their ability to feed themselves and their family.
	How are we going to keep them from grabbing guillotines and coming for us?
	He used that phrase, guillotines.
	And everybody ignored that and said, he just disrespected farmers.
	Yeah, he disrespected all of us.
	He wants to make all of us slaves to him.
	And so he was pushing that.
	Andrew Yang was pushing universal basic income.
	That was his single issue when he began.
	And Elon Musk gave him lots of money because Elon Musk is all about universal basic income as well.
	So is Sam Altman, the guy who is now running OpenAI, the guy who also has his WorldCoin thing.
	Yeah, we got this thing that looks like an eyeball, and you just stare into it, and it gets your biometric information about your retina or whatever, and we'll give you a little bit of a coin.
	Sell your freedom, your inheritance of freedom.
	Just sell it for a bowl of porridge here.
	Just look into this little orb.
	And so it's pretty widespread with a lot of the technocrats.
	But of course, it was a precedent that was also helped along by Donald Trump.
	Never before... In history, have we had people be able to stay home and collect a check for doing nothing?
	And you didn't have to qualify. It went to everybody.
	Everybody got that stimulus check.
	Everybody needed to stay home.
	And so this is another precedent that Trump did, you know, moving the universal basic income, moving the Overton window for everybody.
	As technocracy.com says, the universal basic income movement is global.
	It's being pushed straight from the top at the UN. What they don't say is that the person who pushed it and who established that precedent was Donald Trump in 2020.
	How South Dakota State Senator John Wolk likes to think of himself as a lookout.
	Keeping an eye on new laws, programs, and ideas that are brewing across the states.
	He said, I don't bring a ton of legislation.
	The main thing I like to do is to try to stay ahead of friends and try, sorry, trends, not friends.
	I like to stay ahead of trends and try and prevent bad things from coming into our state.
	This session, that means sponsoring successful legislation banning cities or counties from creating universal basic income programs.
	And let me just comment.
	This is, again, this is on Stateline publication, looking at what's happening at states.
	This is a global agenda, as technocracy.com point out.
	This is coming from the UN on down.
	We all know what this is about.
	We've all seen it. They've given us some rough time frames they would like to get this through.
	How do you stop it?
	At the state and local level.
	You have to understand what the global plans are.
	But you understand that where the rubber meets the road is at the state level.
	The globalism is only going to be blocked at the local and state level.
	You're not going to have people like Mike Johnson or Donald Trump or Joe Biden block it.
	They're going to help it. They're going to help it.
	The solution is not in the District of Columbia.
	The solution is not in the Oval Office with a president.
	The solution is going to be done at the state level and or the local level.
	While Wilk isn't aware of any local governments publicly floating the idea in South Dakota, he says such programs as bureaucrats trying to hand out checks to make sure that your party registration matches whoever signed the checks for the rest of your life.
	That's the way he phrases it. That's right.
	They want to make you dependent.
	That's always been the purpose of welfare.
	And the purpose of central bank digital currency is the same as welfare for all.
	And it truly does amaze me to see libertarian economists, people who have in the past warned us about the welfare state, Murray, who wrote books about that that were the basis of,
	used for welfare reform by conservatives in the 1980s, now becoming, Charles Murray, now becoming a supporter and a pusher We're good to go.
	And expanded many things, not just the stimulus check, but the child tax credit, all these other things.
	But it directly handed cash to people from the federal government who just puts it on their tab.
	South Dakota is among at least six states.
	Where GOP officials have looked to ban basic income programs.
	The basic income concept has been around for decades.
	In 2019, they did an experiment in Stockton, California.
	By the way, Stockton, California was the first municipality to go bankrupt.
	But they still have all these bankrupt Democrat ideas.
	And they selected 125 individuals to get $500 a month with no strings attached for two years.
	But, you know, they can't afford to do that.
	And once you start this stuff, then it becomes very difficult to stop it.
	They quote Ronald Reagan, who said, the closest thing to eternal life on this planet is a government program.
	He's absolutely right.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back on RockFan, Jason Barker.
	Good to see you there at Nights of the Storm and Foxhole Report.
	And, of course, he has Nights of the Storm with Angry Tiger, who has Snake and Tiger Financial Report.
	Jason says, when I lived in Japan, they had a 100% tax On all imported American cars.
	We had little to no tax on their cars coming in, and it was killing our industry.
	Yeah. Talk about asymmetry that is happening there.
	And, of course, it was the type of thing that went on for a long time and with a lot of different types of goods, not just cars.
	When you look at the European tax structure, the value-added tax that they have, Where there is a tax, like a sales tax, that is added at every stage of production or when you hand it off to somebody else and they do something else with it.
	At every stage, you have a tax.
	Whereas here, with a sales tax, you only pay the tax at the final sale.
	There, they had a tax at every level.
	And so it got to be very expensive, and they would make sure that if their goods were going to be exported, whether it was a car or a candy container, if you've ever been to Europe, you could say, well, I'm shipping this to the U.S. Oh, okay, well, you get a VAT credit, or you don't have to pay it, or something like that.
	They'd fill out a form. We're good to go.
	Having not only the American taxes, but the taxes that were imposed on them in foreign countries, and if they're very protective, like Japan with 100% tax rate, they get 100% tax, plus all the American taxes are on that car as well.
	Yeah, we've been playing stupid for a long time.
	Really long time.
	On Rockfan, Andromeda1, thank you very much for the tip.
	And Eric, thank you as well.
	And on Rumble, Milton Friedman2 is now a monthly supporter.
	Thank you so much. I appreciate that.
	Let's do an update here.
	I talked a couple of days ago about what happened, I think, when was it, over the weekend or something, where that bishop in Australia was attacked.
	Bishop Marmari Emanuel is his name.
	He was stabbed multiple times during a live stream in Sydney at the church service.
	He's been in stable condition, and when you look at that, and when you first look at that video, it is truly horrific, and you wonder if he survived that.
	Well, yeah, and he's in stable condition.
	As a matter of fact, the Guardian, instead of saying this person who allegedly stabbed, they usually put allegedly there until somebody's been convicted of something, but not there with the victim.
	And so they put that he was allegedly stabbed.
	No, he was really stabbed.
	The question is who did it, but we've got the video, so we pretty much know who did it.
	And then, of course, the Guardian and other media turn around and attack this guy because they said that he's transphobic, he's an anti-vaxxer, all the rest of this stuff.
	Allegedly stabbed. So, speaking from his hospital bed on Thursday morning, the bishop delivered a message to the attacker.
	I say to him, you're my son, I love you, and I always pray for you.
	He said an audio message.
	Whoever sent you to do this, I forgive them as well.
	In Jesus' mighty name, I have nothing in my heart but love for everyone.
	Whether that person is a Christian or not is totally beside the point.
	The Lord Jesus always taught us to love one another, and for this young man I say to you, you're my son, you always will be, my praise, in the name of the Lord Jesus, he said to him.
	Well, when you look at what happened, and of course no charges have been laid against him yet, they've got counter-terrorism, police are there, they finally came around to saying it was a terrorist attack because he's shouting Allahu Akbar, is he?
	Stabbed him. But he's had to undergo surgery.
	Because he cut off one of his fingers.
	Now, I wanted to wait a little bit to try to get some clarity on this.
	Some people were reporting that he had several fingers cut off.
	Other people reported that he had cut off one finger.
	Other people said that his switchblade had not opened up properly.
	So the first few stabs that he got in did not count.
	Here's the video of this again.
	And... He's attacked there.
	He did get the blade out.
	He did stab this bishop and other people who were trying to stop him.
	But it could have been worse because he first came after him with his face, but he did not have the blade deployed.
	So the response of the premier there in New South Wales I said that what needs to happen is we need to have social media platforms need to be held to account after this.
	And they need to be held to account because they show people what I just showed you.
	That's the problem. See, we're the problem.
	It's not the newcomer.
	They're fine. Their response to everything is going to be censorship of some way, control of some way.
	They want to control speech, not borders.
	And so that's where they are coming up.
	We've got to control that.
	Well, as people are looking at this, they point out this is something of a miracle, said one guy who was a close friend of this guy who got stabbed, this Bishop Emmanuel.
	He said...
	Save from death because the alleged attacker's knife failed to open properly during the stabbing, and the suspect cut off his own finger in the botched attack.
	Close friend Danny Abdallah spoke to the bishop as he recovered in hospital overnight on Tuesday, revealed further details that had come to light.
	The bishop was stabbed multiple times, rushed to the hospital in stable condition.
	He appeared to strike the bishop a series of blows to the head and neck repeatedly, swinging down in a stabbing motion.
	In the video clip, the alleged attacker pauses briefly to look at his hand before returning the attack, but was unable to properly open the knife.
	It's since been confirmed that the attacker cut off his own finger with the knife during the attack.
	Wasn't that interesting?
	You know? God using the weapon against him.
	It's not a weapon. Very much like the Psalms.
	So many of those.
	May he fall into the pit that he dug for others.
	He, the alleged knifeman, went for the face, and he was going for the face, but the knife didn't open, said Mr.
	Abdallah. Who has spoken to this bishop in the hospital.
	So, in California, we have now...
	California lawmakers unveil plans to try to move reparations along.
	And, of course, one of the real practical problems with these reparations is even deciding who gets them, right?
	Barack Obama...
	Is half white, half black?
	And there's even questions about who is his father on the black side.
	Is it the guy from Africa or is it somebody from Chicago that's been identified by some people?
	You've got Angela Davis who is horrified to find out that both of her grandfathers were white.
	It says a black Marxist who has lived her life pushing racism.
	And she's horrified to find out that she's half white, right?
	And then you have people like Elizabeth Warren.
	I don't know. The reparations, I don't think, are going for Indians, but, you know, she might have some genealogy office looking into her if they do something like this in her neck of the woods.
	So California lawmakers unveiled plans for a genealogy office to decide which residents are genuine descendants of slaves and could get life-changing benefit payouts.
	Well, we already know that it's not going to include Lala Harris.
	You know, she didn't come from this country.
	It was her father, I think, was it Jamaica or something?
	Bragged about the fact that their family owned slaves.
	So, you know, she's got a mother from India, a father from Jamaica, and his family owned the slaves.
	So is she going to have to pay for some of that?
	Well, that's Jamaica.
	It's not in California.
	But again, California never was a slave state either.
	And so the state's first-in-the-nation reparations task force last year decided that some residents should win $1.2 million payouts as compensation for injustice from the slavery era onward.
	The purpose of this is to divide.
	It is divisive. It is going to be unjust.
	People will be penalized because of what their ancestors did.
	That's what this is about. This genealogy office is the ultimate in this kind of Maoist civil war they want to create over race.
	It is absolutely unworkable besides being unjust.
	But what is really sad about this...
	Is that if you look at some of the churches, I think it was in Boston, where you had some of the churches demanding, some black churches demanding that white churches pay them or something like that.
	And I said, do they not understand the fundamental message of Christianity?
	Which is exactly what this bishop was saying.
	You know, we forgive people.
	Why do we forgive people?
	Well, because if you're a Christian, if you're a black Christian, and you're going to demand that white Christians pay you for something that you didn't do, that you think maybe their ancestors did, You have absolutely, you're harboring unforgiveness in your heart.
	And you are not willing to lay the things that have been done to you that you imagine.
	Actually, they were done to your ancestors many generations back.
	You're not willing to leave that at the cross.
	Well, then you're not going to be able to leave your sins at the cross either.
	The things that you have done.
	He died for what, the wrongs that we did.
	And the wrongs that were done to us.
	Churches don't understand that anymore.
	In New Jersey, you have student members of an unofficial club are under investigation for alleged racism.
	What is this unofficial club?
	It is the White Student Union.
	What a racist. It's not okay to be white.
	You know, that's one of the things I talked about.
	Seeing this happening at the University of South Florida in Tampa 50 years ago when I was a student there.
	We had the Black Student Union, which is incredibly racist.
	We had the Gay Coalition.
	These two organizations were not only, you know, the Black Student Union, Gay Coalition, exclusion.
	They excluded other people.
	They're very divisive. And they hung together, and even though it was a large student body of 25,000 students, they were able to hang together because most of the people were commuting students and didn't really have much connection to what was happening on campus at the time.
	That's changed now, I understand.
	They've got sports teams and stuff like that.
	But at that point in time, they could hang together.
	They could make sure they won the elections because nobody ever voted.
	I never voted in any of those elections.
	I never knew when they were, who was running in any of them.
	The only reason I knew about all this stuff or even knew about what happened with student government was because, you know, we had 25,000 students and everybody had to pay a student activity fee.
	And the student government got control of all those funds.
	And these guys, the Black Student Union and the Gay Coalition, gave it to themselves.
	And there were some criminal allegations, but they never convicted anybody.
	They got away with it. And I've been watching that same pattern in government for the last 50 years.
	So here's a white student union.
	Again, yeah, racist probably, but is it any different than the black student union?
	Probably not. But one form of racism is encouraged, the other is discouraged, because they want to divide the country over race.
	That's what Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dorn, the Weathermen Underground...
	They knew they couldn't get a traditional Marxist revolution between different economic classes, so they wanted to do it over racial issues.
	In North Carolina, a high school student at 16 is suspended for saying illegal alien in class.
	He got suspended, and it's on his permanent record.
	That he's a racist. And he was hoping to get a scholarship as a track student.
	He believes that this is going to keep him from being able to do that.
	He questioned the term alien in an assignment.
	He says, does this refer to space aliens or illegal aliens without green cards?
	He's joking around, and they didn't think that was funny.
	Should have used the term squatter.
	That's a better term anyway.
	I guess they wanted him to refer to them as newcomers.
	But perhaps he doesn't realize that this might be the best thing that ever happened to him if he doesn't go to college.
	If he thinks this is bad, he gets labeled a racist and suspended from school for talking about using the term illegal alien.
	Oh, what do you think is going to happen when he gets to college?
	I said earlier, you know, you had the South Dakota representatives looking at universal basic income, trying to shut it down before it gets to South Carolina.
	Well, we have people in Tennessee that are pretty proactive with things like this.
	And, of course, what we've seen happening in New York with squatters, we now have a Tennessee bill to protect property owners from squatters.
	I put this in here because, again, whatever state you're in, you need to understand that That the state can make it better or worse.
	Has anything been done in New York to stop their excessive squatter laws?
	You can go in and if you're there for 30 days, now you own the place, essentially.
	And we've seen people in New York get arrested by the police because they try to get these squatters out.
	They take the side of the squatters.
	We've seen property owners in New York get killed by the squatters.
	So, here in Tennessee, they're trying to head this off.
	Home ownership is the American dream for many.
	So, State Representative Tim Rudd from Murfreesboro.
	He says, You see, You've got laws being drawn up in Tennessee, maybe other places as well, to make sure that if somebody moves in you streamline the
	process to get them removed. Whereas New York has done nothing.
	Nothing has been done in New York.
	They've got the worst laws to start with.
	And when I looked it up, I think in Tennessee they had to live there for seven years before they could assert in any legal type of thing. But of course, evicting somebody is a different situation. That's what they're trying to address with this. And so New York has done nothing about this.
	That's what I say. You can solve some of these problems at the state level, or you can make them worse.
	The press release says the bill removes much of the burden from legitimate property owners by establishing a clear process for law enforcement to restore possession.
	It can expedite the removal of illegal occupants in as little as 72 hours.
	And the legislation also clarifies that the sheriff may arrest the trespassers.
	Dishonest trespassers have learned to exploit the law in places like New York, where a squatter who occupies a home for at least 30 days can be granted tenant rights, says the press release.
	Lawful property owners are then forced to go through a court eviction process to reclaim their homes.
	And so, still nothing is being done in New York, but in some other states they're already working on it.
	This, I thought, was kind of interesting from a personal standpoint.
	Red Lobster is considering Chapter 11 bankruptcy after they lost $11 million.
	Most of that, they said, was because of their endless shrimp promotion.
	Wow. I guess this is a jumbo shrimp problem.
	The shrimp problem got really, really big.
	So... And when I saw this article, it hit with me personally.
	The chain started as a single restaurant in Lakeland, Florida in 1968.
	It has about 650 locations in almost all the states.
	And I worked at one when I was in high school in Tampa that was near Bush Gardens on Bush Boulevard.
	And I had some friends who went there, got some jobs, and they were getting paid pretty good.
	They were working in the kitchen or as dishwashers.
	And so I went there to apply for a job.
	Unfortunately, I went in wearing a white shirt and a tie.
	And you can be a busboy.
	It's like, what? That doesn't pay as well.
	And I did that for about six weeks, I guess.
	And, you know, the thing is, I hate seafood anyway.
	I just went there because my friends were working there in the kitchen.
	I thought I'd get a job with them, but I thought, all right, I'll give it a try.
	I needed the money. So I did that for just a short period of time.
	Something about the butter sauce or something they had would get onto my shirt right above my pants when I'm carrying the busboy thing.
	And my mom couldn't get it out even with bleach.
	She said, what is this stuff?
	I said, I don't know, but they're eating it.
	It's one of these fast food things.
	The final straw was one waitress who was kind of crabby working at Red Lobster.
	And she did not get a tip.
	At one of these tables. And she accused me of stealing her tip.
	I was like, I'm not going to steal your tip.
	But, you know, the person who was the manager there, she asked me about it.
	She didn't believe that I'd stolen it.
	But I said, well, if I'm even going to be suspected of this, I'm done.
	And I walked out, you know.
	So now they...
	Did their endless shrimp promotion.
	Evidently, the shrimp was pretty good because people ate so much of it that put them out of business.
	And then we have this.
	Boston Dynamics. Look at this.
	This is their new robot.
	You've seen the robot that does tumbling, somersaults, and all the rest of this.
	Look at that. This is electric. Look at that.
	It's coming to life. It's like something straight out of Terminator.
	It's double-jointed.
	It stands up. The legs go backwards.
	Now look at this. The head looks at you, walks towards you, and now the body turns around.
	Wow. Wow.
	And as one person said, just make sure that if that light, you know, you look at the face there, Boston Dynamics.
	So it's got this big black circle as its head.
	Its head is like a cylinder.
	It's a big black circle, no eyes or anything like that, but just a white thing around it.
	And I said, if that goes red, you better start running, you know.
	I don't know what it is about Boston Dynamics.
	They seem to revel in this kind of dystopian approach to their products.
	They like to do videos about that.
	They go out of their way to look sinister.
	Unlike, you know, the one that we showed last week, you know, where it was OpenAI working with this company called Figure.
	And you were told to do something, and it's working out these puzzles.
	But it had this California dude kind of voice.
	Oh, yeah. Okay. Sure, yeah, whatever, you know, that type of thing.
	And so they went out of their way to do that, even to have it say, yeah, yeah, I could do that, you know.
	And so they're trying to create this aesthetic that is, you know, this laid-back California dude guy, which really has a cognitive dissonance with the robot thing there.
	But Boston Dynamics just owns it.
	Oh, they want to go full Terminator, and they are constantly pushing that.
	We designed the electric version of Atlas to be stronger, more dexterous, more agile.
	Atlas may resemble a human form factor, but we're equipping the robot to move in the most efficient way possible to complete a task.
	Rather than being constrained by a human range of emotion.
	Again, look at the way this thing stands up.
	Atlas will move in ways that exceed human capability.
	Oh, isn't that nice? They said they're exploring commercial uses for the new Atlas, beginning with Hyundai, which acquired the robotics firm in 2021.
	Competitor Agility Robotics has a partnership that lets Amazon use its biped robots called Digit to lift and to move items in some warehouses.
	Of course, they have a... This backwards insect kind of leg that you saw with that Charlie Sheen movie.
	I talked about that.
	It's amazing. And then the dog.
	The dog that looks like it stepped...
	Well, of course, they used that form factor for Black Mirror.
	You know, it looks more like an insect, a metal insect, than it does a dog.
	Yeah, the future is kind of interesting, isn't it?
	Thank you for joining us. Have a good day.
	Let me tell you, the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?

▲