Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 8, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:00

The David Knight Show - 04/08/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday the 8th of April, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, we have a lot of news.
	We have a lot of war news.
	Israel has moved the IDF out of Gaza, but of course we also have Ukraine happening.
	We're going to take a look at that.
	However, we're going to begin with news, and we're going to begin also with what is happening with automobiles.
	Now you might think this is a distraction.
	This is not about next year's model.
	This is about whether or not they're going to block you from moving at all.
	As a matter of fact, cars have now become the home for many homeless people.
	Maybe that's what they'll all become if Biden gets his way.
	They're calling, some of the people calling them massive amounts of cars parked in places of people living in them, Bidenvilles.
	That may be a good description for them.
	We'll be right back. You know, also take a look at a really strange article that was sent to me by a listener.
	An experiment where they hit people with electromagnetic radiation to destroy their belief in God.
	Well, that brings up all kinds of questions.
	You know, what's going on with 5G? But it's also, who is it that is paying these people to do this kind of research?
	It's like, do we have an evil government or what?
	But again, nothing for you to be afraid of in terms of your connection with God, and I'll explain why.
	But let's talk about what's going on with the bridge that was knocked down in Maryland.
	The Maryland governor says that this aggressive timeline that he's been talking about is actually going to happen.
	I was surprised to see them saying that they're going to have it fully functioning by the end of May.
	We'll see about that. As I said from the very beginning, the Sunshine Skyway Bridge was knocked down that connected Tampa to St.
	Petersburg, and that was a commuting bridge.
	It was not something that was vital to a city and to a state's economy.
	But it'll be interesting to see if we can summon the will, get past the corruption and the red tape, and actually get something done in America.
	I'm rooting that I hope that they can.
	I still am skeptical.
	Who knows? Maybe they'll just get rid of all the red tape.
	Like I said, it took them three years for planning and approval permits.
	And that was back in 1980.
	It took them another four years to build another bridge alongside of it.
	So it'll be interesting to see how they're going to have a bridge built in such a short time.
	He says they've already done a great deal in terms of removal of...
	Of debris from the former bridge.
	But that's a whole other thing to build it back that quickly.
	But we'll see what happens. Also in a follow-up to the bridge story, I thought it was kind of interesting that yet another ship lost power.
	This one in New York City. You probably saw this over the weekend.
	Close to the Verrazano Bridge.
	And it had tugboats around it at the time.
	It was not just by itself.
	They had three tugboats, they said, but they needed another three tugboats to get it under control because of so much mass, a lot of inertia on these gigantic ships, container ships.
	But the question is losing power again.
	Isn't that odd? You know, they tried very hard to sell the narrative, which I'm not really necessarily buying it, that it was bad fuel.
	Could be bad maintenance.
	Maybe all these things are really sloppy.
	I mean, look at what is happening to planes.
	They've got pieces falling off of them left and right.
	We just had another plane with an engine cover flew off of it.
	But, you know, when you look at what is happening to our economy and the slipshod way that everything is running, as a matter of fact, Maybe it's because they're not hiring the best people.
	You know, Rob Schneider's got a routine about that, DEI. CEO of United Airlines last month, the CEO, he announced of all the hiring for all the new pilots that are coming up this year, all the hiring for the new pilots, the main focus is going to be diversity.
	What? Diversity?
	Not the best pilots you can find?
	The most hours of experience?
	Nope diversity. I don't know about you, but I'm sick and tired of flying all the time with these white pilots landing safely and on time.
	Boring! Yeah, it does make more interesting news when all these other things are happening.
	Planes are falling apart mid-air and ships, one after the other, losing power and crashing into bridges.
	We really have a society and Gates spending unbelievable amounts of money to propagandize kids and say, don't worry about math.
	There's no right answer to anything.
	Not even to math.
	Let's remove all objective truth and the idea that it even exists.
	You'll do what Gates wants you to do, right?
	And that's what he wants. He doesn't want critical thinking people.
	I've seen this for the longest time.
	They don't want educated people.
	They want to deliberately dumb you down.
	You know, from Charlotte Iserby to George Carlin.
	I had listeners send me George Carlin's thing that, you know, it's a club and you ain't in it.
	A long clip of that.
	And he's absolutely right. It's the type of thing.
	They don't want to educate people.
	They want you uneducated.
	They don't want you to believe that anybody's got the right answer to anything.
	Whether it's building a bridge or maintaining a plane or anything else.
	But again, it comes back to this loss of power.
	As I said, it's kind of convenient for them to hang out on the fuel thing.
	But how does that work in New York City?
	They do the same thing.
	They sell people junk fuel.
	Why didn't it happen to other ships there with this thing?
	But as I said, that just doesn't seem right.
	If it was maintenance, well, somebody would be in a lot of trouble.
	If it was cyber attacks, then people would start to freak out about that.
	I have no idea what's going on inside the ships.
	I have no idea how connected they are.
	I know things are being more and more connected all the time.
	It's not beyond reason that there is some vulnerable part of the system that they could attack.
	Which would cause other things to shut off.
	We're seeing this everywhere. We've seen this.
	A goat tree talked about it.
	Every year, many years ago, we were talking about this, how they were hacking cars, how they were hacking medical devices, and how a guy who was going to demonstrate how to hack these medical devices died suddenly from an overdose there in Vegas just before the convention where he's going to expose it.
	And goat tree said, I know him.
	He doesn't use, he says, he's no more likely to use drugs than you are, talking to me.
	And he goes, you know, anyway, when we look at all of this stuff, again, I don't understand how these ships are connected, but it does seem suspicious to me.
	And when we talk about the fragility of our infrastructure, I thought this was fascinating.
	It's from techspot.com.
	Two mines in North Carolina are the world's only producer of the quartz that is necessary for semiconductor manufacturing.
	Well, why aren't we using that like the Chinese are using their rare earth advantage and lithium advantage and everything?
	Of course, their biggest advantage is the one that we gave them in terms of CO2. They can emit all the CO2 and methane they want.
	No restrictions on that whatsoever.
	India as well, the two largest population because of the Paris Climate Treaty.
	But we have to reduce and cap ours.
	And we now got the EPA. On our power stations, just like they've been on our cars.
	Try to destroy them and shut them down.
	Make everything more expensive. Break everything.
	But we have two minds in North Carolina.
	The entire semiconductor industry is dependent on it.
	Quartz you can get in a lot of different places.
	But this is a particular pure type of quartz that they need as they start to get more and more advanced semiconductors.
	As you get more and more advanced semiconductors, I remember, you know, they were trying to get to, I don't even, I don't remember, I don't remember what the dimensions were.
	But it was orders of magnitude bigger, the geometries that they were working with, when I was doing it 40 years ago, 44 now, than it is today.
	And so they just keep getting things smaller and smaller, which means that you have to have more and more refinement, less tolerance for error.
	We start getting down into what is essentially nanotechnology almost now.
	You have to, they're very susceptible to any kind of impurity.
	Ultra-high purity quartz central component for semiconductor chips.
	The only places in the world that can meet the need are two mines in small North Carolina town.
	And so the owner of the mines, a company you've probably never heard of, Sabelco, is investing $700 million to expand capacity.
	But is that going to be enough to keep up with the expanding demand, especially because of artificial intelligence?
	Because I guess that's it.
	I guess that's where the state of the art is now, where they have to have the purest quartz.
	It's in a town called Spruce Pine, which I've never heard of.
	About a two-hour drive northwest of Charlotte.
	It's probably not too far from here.
	Very tiny town, two mines.
	And what's fascinating about this is when you stop and think about these obscure little things like this, what does it take to bust our infrastructure?
	Not much. There's so many things like this that we don't know anything about.
	As I've said before, the first time I talked to Jack Lawson about a civil defense manual that he put together, twin volume.
	You can find it at civildefensemanual.com.
	But the first time we talked about it, that's what he talked about.
	He said, look at how fragile our infrastructure is.
	Not only do we have these weird things like this, But we also have, and a lot of times, some critical component that's not even in our country.
	It's somewhere else.
	Usually that is the case.
	Just take a look at, you know, we have the purity of quartz that is unique here in our country.
	And yet most of the advanced semiconductors are being made in Taiwan.
	So what happens if there's some kind of a conflict between Taiwan and China?
	Well, that all comes to an end.
	And so, but he was talking about just in terms of the different transportation links between everything with the just-in-time delivery of inventory or distributed infrastructure.
	So it's, again, if you want to know what you can do to prepare yourself to get outside of that incredibly complicated, layered, and fragile infrastructure system that we have now.
	Yes, it's delivered amazing things to us.
	And we're starting to see it get very shaky, aren't we?
	In a lot of different ways. And there are vulnerabilities that we never knew about.
	And so you need to start taking a look at how you can prepare to survive outside of that infrastructure, which could easily go down or be taken down by enemies, foreign or domestic.
	Very easy for that to go down.
	On Rockfan, Handy says, my work partner's mom was just diagnosed with lymphoma.
	Oh, I'm sorry. She had been telling him.
	She didn't take any shots.
	Turns out she took three and didn't tell him.
	I'm sorry to hear that.
	On Rockfin. Thank you, James.
	I appreciate the tip. Well, as they point out, it's integral not only to the global semiconductor industry, but also to the solar photovoltaic market.
	The solar panels. Got to have that quartz.
	I hope they've got a lot of it.
	It does boggle the mind a bit to consider that inside nearly every cell phone and computer chip, you'll find quartz.
	From Spruce Pine, a town you've never heard of before.
	Right here in North Carolina.
	Probably not too far from us if they're two hours northwest to Charlotte.
	Because it was about four or five hours from Raleigh to here.
	Anyway, and then we take a look at how they're constantly spying on everything and on you.
	Wall Street Journal has a story about insurers looking at yet another reason to go up on your rates or to cancel you altogether.
	And so in this particular case, what they're doing is going around and doing aerial inspections of homes.
	Getting a drone and taking aerial pictures of, let's say, your roof.
	Well, I'm sorry, your roof has got problems with it.
	And they gave the example of one woman who, the insurance company, flew a drone over her house, took pictures of the roof, said, your roof is crummy, we're going to cancel your insurance.
	And she called out a roofer, independent contractor.
	He said, no, you got another, what was it, five or ten years on it?
	So it's in fine shape.
	They wouldn't listen to it. They canceled it anyway.
	They're just looking for an excuse.
	Also going around looking, do you have like a trampoline on your property that you didn't tell us about?
	Because now there's additional liability for us.
	But what this reminds me of more than anything, I've seen this game before in Tampa.
	And I've talked about it on the show as well.
	Sandy Friedman, who they called Sandlot Friedman, because she was trying to get rid of homes.
	She would go into very low-income homes, and a lot of these were old houses that had been built 40, 50 years earlier, lived in by poor people, but they were, for the most part, paid off.
	They'd had them for a very long time.
	Elderly people, and...
	They didn't have the income to do a lot of home maintenance, and so they would send building inspectors around.
	They were not flying overhead.
	They didn't have drones.
	They'd just send the building inspectors around.
	Your lawn needs to be mowed, and so we're going to start hitting you with $50 a day fines for that.
	You've got to paint your home.
	That's going to be $75 a day for that.
	This really happened, and this happened back in the 1980s.
	And the purpose of it was to accumulate enough fees that the city could come in and just steal the home from these people.
	And then Sandlot Friedman, the mayor, would knock the houses down.
	Wouldn't resell them. Just knock them down.
	And then do that to another one, another one, another one.
	And they got enough of them down.
	Then they would use eminent domain on the few remaining.
	And then turn that Sandlot over to her friend's.
	We're real estate developers.
	Because at the local level, most of the corruption is with real estate stuff and zoning stuff.
	When you get to the state level, that's when they switch over to lawyers and they start doing things.
	But at the local level, a lot of it was about real estate.
	And so she was doing these condemnations in order to help her friends build out skyscrapers and that type of thing in Tampa in the early 80s.
	My sister was contacted by some people that my dad had He had a mortgage.
	He would go in and he'd buy homes and fix them up and do it himself.
	And then he...
	There were some of these that were still mortgages that were being paid.
	And these people ran into this type of thing and contacted my sister who was managing it at the time.
	And she went down to Tampa to see what was going on.
	And in the courtroom, they had the one...
	She's watching the cases come up there.
	We had a little old lady who somebody had dropped a railroad tie in the back of her house.
	It was an alley that ran down the back of the house and they dropped this railroad tie there.
	She called the city of Tampa and said, can you move this for me?
	Somebody just dropped this on my property.
	Well, they sent a guy out and he gave her a ticket and said, you have to remove it.
	And until you do, we're going to start accumulating this fine.
	And so the judge playing hardball with her.
	Because that's what this court was set up to do, to steal people's property.
	You know, it's like a tax court or something like that.
	And so he says, no, was that on your property or not?
	She says, well, it was on my property.
	And the guy stands up who was there to advocate for these people.
	He said, don't answer that question.
	Don't say anything else to him.
	I mean, it was amazing, amazing what they were doing to people.
	I think that's what this insurance scam is about, frankly.
	I think you got, you know, the big businesses, the big companies, they're moving at the point where they want to take homes from people.
	They're using any kind of excuse to make them more expensive, to confiscate them.
	And I think that is part of this.
	Certainly, they're always looking for ways to rip people off, but it may be that aspect of it.
	It may go that far. That is an organized process to do that.
	While we're talking about destroying the middle class, we all knew that the massive army of IRS agents that Biden was putting out there, that was its purpose, right?
	We said that from the very beginning.
	So anytime you look at Well, what are we going to have to do to pay for the government?
	Well, there's absolutely no way that you can pay for the government when it's adding another trillion dollars every hundred days.
	There's no way that they could ever tax us to do that.
	We are so far beyond anything that could ever be fiscally responsible or even paid off.
	As I've said many times, if they're going to go with their...
	Magic money tree theory, they call it MMT, modern monetary theory, which says that deficits don't matter.
	Well, if the deficits don't matter, and you're going into debt more than a trillion dollars every 100 days, then why does it matter to have an income tax, right?
	Well, because that's targeting us.
	That's making sure that we stay poor or that we get poorer.
	That's to make sure that they've sawn off the rungs on the ladder so that we can't climb onto it, because they're already up there.
	That's why you have the income tax.
	That and so that you can weaponize it against your political enemies.
	But of course, they have so many other weapons for their political enemies today, don't they?
	This is really about breaking the middle class.
	And now documents have come out from the IRS that show, in fact, that the new IRS agents that they have hired are, in fact, doing exactly that.
	That they're targeting the middle class for audits because the middle class doesn't have the money or the ability to really defend themselves in these audits.
	And when the law is sufficiently complex as the IRS code is, it's the same as having no law at all.
	And depending on who is your auditor, what they think about you, and who has stuck them on you, makes all the difference in the world.
	Back in August of 2022, says Liz Wolf, when some of us were fresh-faced and naive, the Internal Revenue Service assured us that their $80 billion infusion of cash...
	So they could hire 87,000 new workers, including but not limited to men with guns, would actually be a means of targeting millionaires and billionaire scofflaws, but not ordinary middle class wage earners.
	She says, at the time I voiced skepticism, correspondence in audits and other audits of low and middle income earners are simply the easiest to conduct.
	I mean, if we go and look at civil asset forfeiture, right?
	You look at the big cities where they have come after people, they would steal from the poorest people.
	They'd like to go in and get cars that were valued about $1,000 because they would charge you $900 to contest that.
	That's one of the reasons I say it's a civil forfeiture.
	Well, we're not saying that you did any crime.
	We're just saying that the car did a crime.
	I'm not charging you with anything.
	I'm not going to get a conviction against you, but that car did something, had something in its possession.
	This kind of bizarre anthropomorphism, projecting human qualities onto inanimate objects.
	They always charged a stack of cash, or a Learjet, or a car, or something, or a home.
	But they were going after targeting, after they started that, well, it was going to be to shut down organized crime, of course.
	But it very quickly went to coming after people who are pro-life protesters.
	And then it went after the poor people.
	Again, cities like Chicago and other places like that, where they said, well, if you want to contest this, you've got to put up $900 so you can argue that your property is innocent.
	And so they would steal cars that were about $900.
	So even if the people wanted to push back against it, it was not anything that made any sense for them.
	Well, the IRS got an audit of its own, and two irregularities jumped out, reported the Wall Street Journal.
	President Biden's plan to hire a new army of tax collectors is falling flat, and the agents are already at work.
	Are targeting the middle class, says the Wall Street Journal.
	As of last summer, 63% of new audits targeted taxpayers with income of less than $200,000.
	63% targeting people of less than $200,000.
	Remember, they were going to go after the billionaires.
	Only a small overall share reached the very highest earners, while 80% of audits covered filers earning less than a million.
	These resources are absolutely not about increasing audit scrutiny on small businesses or middle-income Americans, they said.
	We've been planning our investment of these enforcement resources.
	It's designed around the Department of Treasury's directive that audit rates will not rise relative to recent years for households making under $400,000, he wrote.
	Well, all of that was a lie.
	And we now see it.
	Janet Yellen, former Fed, Federal Reserve Chairman and Treasury Secretary now, said well contrary to misinformation from opponents to this legislation, small business or households earning $400,000 per year or less will not see an increase in the chances that they are audited and yet now that we audit the auditors, who watches the watchers?
	Who audits the auditors?
	Well, when we audit them, we find out that, guess what, they're lying.
	63% of audits targeted taxpayers with income less than $200,000.
	And that would include businesses as well.
	Now, here's what the IRS is about.
	And they don't even get to it in this article.
	This increase in the IRS. I've said from the very beginning, yes, it is going to not be directed at the richest people, but that was a whole bluff about the income tax in the first place.
	It was only going to be a 1% tax on the 1%, the upper 1%.
	And then very quickly it metastasized into not being a tax on income.
	Which was defined at that time as investment income.
	Money that you'd make on the stock market and that type of thing.
	Then it changed to wages during World War II. It had never been a tax on wages before.
	And then they kept it.
	Statutorily it was limited. But after World War II ended, you would get in your, when they'd mail out the forms every time, they'd say, thank you for participating in our voluntary tax system.
	Well, if you don't participate, you find out real quickly just how voluntary it is.
	It's all a very cynical lie from the very beginning.
	But this lie was really about taking everything from us as part of the Great Reset, as part of CBDC. Because around the same time, that was Biden releases the stuff about, well, let's everybody report back to me, all of you, all the deep state, which is underneath the presidency, all of the deep state, the deep state is the bureaucracy, is all under the executive branch.
	Trump was the king of the swamp.
	He did nothing to clean any of it or drain any of it.
	It got swampier while he was there, as a matter of fact.
	But he told all the swamp to report back to him in four different areas.
	One of those areas was enforcement.
	And that's what he was talking to the Department of Justice and the IRS about how they were going to enforce CBDC. We've yet to see the full impact of these 87,000 new IRS agents and their new budget for artificial intelligence and computers to analyze everything that we do.
	It must be a real dream for these people because that was the purpose of the IRS from the very beginning, really.
	When I first started paying taxes when I was working in college, Talking to my dad about it, it's like, so what's the point of this?
	This is like a signed confession.
	It's like, yep, yep, that's what it is.
	Attesting to all the fact that this is all correct, so they can come after you.
	If they have a different interpretation of this, of course.
	And so it is always, it was an intelligence gathering thing.
	It was an incrimination thing.
	Of course, now they've got social media and a lot of other things like that that we incriminate ourselves with.
	In Switzerland, You have farmers dumping sheep that have been killed by the wolves in front of a Swiss government building.
	Well, I think that is a very fitting metaphor, isn't it?
	You know, the government as wolves preying on the sheep, and the sheep have now dumped the dead sheep that have been killed by the government wolf in front of the building.
	I've said for the longest time, when we talk about the federal government, We just need to drop that extra E and the D, and we have feral government.
	A government that used to be tame, under our control, like George Washington said, like fire.
	You know, government is like fire.
	It is a fearful servant.
	You've got to be very careful with it.
	And a dreadful master if it gets out of control.
	And our federal government has gone feral.
	Here in Switzerland, they have the wolf metaphor.
	Of course, our government here in the United States has released a lot of wolves into areas where they had been eradicated.
	They are pests.
	Around a dozen breeders came from one area in the western Swiss canton to lay out the carcasses of 12 sheep.
	In front of the regional government headquarters in Lausanne.
	These sheep were killed last night, said the member of the association, demanding that the government do something about it.
	It's really time to act.
	The problem is that they don't realize that's what the government wanted them to do.
	We're sick of this.
	We're sick of the wolf kill.
	Cohabitation is not possible.
	Our territory is too small.
	And then, of course, the reality is the government will probably agree with them and say, yeah, you're the ones who have to go.
	We're going to turn it over to the wolves and the predators we identify with them.
	After being wiped out more than a century ago, wolves have, in recent decades, begun returning to Switzerland and to several other European countries introduced by their respective governments.
	And same thing with tyrants.
	A couple hundred years ago, it seems like we got rid of the tyrants.
	And now the tyrants are back, and now they're unleashing wolves on us of one form or the other.
	It can come in the form of surveillance cameras, uniformed officers, IRS agents who don't wear a uniform.
	It can come in so many different forms, can't it?
	But it's still wolves among the sheep.
	And then we have the wolves among the sheep and the political parties and the politicians and so forth, deceiving people.
	Nature conservation groups have hailed the return as a sign of a healthier and more diverse ecosystem.
	Oh, there you go. It's about diversity.
	It's good then, right?
	Always the useful idiots.
	The eco-groups.
	Right there at the center of it.
	So, are your eyes open?
	Says Expose News.
	Global governments are in a silent war against humanity.
	And we're in a prelude to World War III and a march towards a digital dystopia.
	I think a better way to put it is slavery, enslavement.
	They seek to impoverish us so they can enslave us.
	And that is really what is happening.
	They have an introduction here where they say, well, our own intelligence agencies used to be James Bond, but now they've become Blofeld.
	They were never James Bond.
	That was a lie that was sold to you.
	The FBI was never this straight-up organization like J. Edgar Hoover was telling people, doing programs to show people how righteous they were.
	Yeah, he had some good people in the FBI who were focused on law enforcement, but that wasn't the mission of J. Edgar Hoover, you understand.
	You know, he had his own little game that was running in the background there.
	It's a power play in Washington, blackmailing everybody.
	He had multiple presidents saying that.
	And how long does it take before they...
	Stop coming after their political opponents in Washington and start coming after the individual sheep throughout the country.
	Well, that time has already come.
	And we see what the FBI has turned into with that.
	Our educational system, alphabet grooming, robbing its victims of the very freedom of thought and expression.
	That is, again, what it was designed to do.
	You have to understand that our education system was designed as an indoctrination system.
	It was designed as an indoctrination system to say, well, we're going to make our society better.
	We're going to indoctrinate them with our good Christian values.
	Then what happened? The institutions got taken over by the Marxists, as always.
	There's people like Antonio Gramercy that said, well, we're going to take over these institutions.
	We're not going to have a revolution where we overthrow the government like they did in Russia, China, that type of thing.
	No, we're going to do it from the inside.
	We're going to have a long march like Mao did, but it's not going to be a military thing.
	It's going to be a long march through the institutions and a bureaucratic thing.
	It's a very calculated, designed thing.
	And this long march has been going on my entire life.
	We now see the product of this.
	World War III has not yet begun, but our government's already at war with the entire human race around the world.
	It's not just the American government.
	The American government's perhaps the worst of all of them, but they're all at war with their own people.
	That is the scale of the assault that we're facing.
	Indeed, they go so far as to engineer World War III if they can.
	I mean, what control freak does not want martial law?
	Well, that's a rhetorical question.
	We already know the control freaks Trump and the control freak Biden loved it, didn't they?
	And so I thought this was good from the article.
	History has taught us that the public in the West has to be programmed to accept concentration camps and stages.
	Or, you know, the open-air prisons of the 15-minute cities.
	Number one, it starts with an artificial classification.
	You know, for example, vaxxed versus unvaxxed.
	High credit score versus low social credit score, something like that.
	High carbon or low carbon lifestyle.
	Then one demonizes particular classes of people.
	The unvaxxed people are bad.
	The good people are the ones who are vaxxed, that type of thing.
	Then one discriminates against the demonized groups.
	Things become more and more difficult if you don't have that digital ID or that vaccine or whatever.
	Then you start removing rights from the demonized groups.
	Then one blames a demonized group for a manufactured atrocity which has nothing to do with the group.
	Next step, the media incites national hatred against the demonized groups.
	Then the government makes digital IDs mandatory as a result of some other manufactured atrocity because it's always been where the MacGuffin is headed.
	The number of the beast.
	The number of the government.
	Then those without digital IDs can be sent to prison.
	And much of the population will go along with it.
	As we've already seen.
	Or in 2020. Remember?
	Some of these people that are still champions to conservatives...
	Well, it's getting, like Scott Adams, it's getting harder and harder to tell these freedom lovers from sociopaths, do what you need to do to take these people out.
	That's what he said. Two weeks into the two weeks to flatten the curve.
	Yeah. So, those of that digital ID can be sent to prison.
	Much of the population will go along with it, believing that these unregistered people Or enemies of the state, potential terrorists, and a danger to the war effort.
	Or, you know, maybe even as conservatives in Florida are setting up, maybe they're a threat to your employment.
	Maybe you've got these illegal aliens who come in, and everybody needs to have an ID, mandatory E-Verify.
	It's been there for a long time, the E-Verify has, but to make it mandatory, which they just did in Florida.
	Make it mandatory so that you've got to get approval from the federal government to have a job.
	You know that they're going to make an exception for the squatters, don't you?
	Or, you have to, this is the other one that's coming from the conservatives who ought to know better.
	We're worried about these illegal aliens coming in here and voting.
	So we need to have more and more, we've got to have IDs for this, IDs for that.
	I do think that you ought to have IDs for voting.
	I've talked about that for a long time.
	But you understand it's going to be the fear Of these people.
	And it comes from both the left and the right.
	The left just wants to control everything.
	The right's got certain things that they want to control.
	But they're getting there.
	They're getting to the same position that the left has been for a long time.
	Big daddy government is your friend.
	We just got to make sure that it's our big daddy who's there.
	And not that bad big daddy from the other people.
	We want the red Big Daddy or the orange Big Daddy.
	We don't want the blue Big Daddy.
	That's the power that they have.
	And we know how this all turns out, too, don't we?
	This is a good post on X from Andrew Cote.
	And he said he's talking about the Chinese Cultural Revolution.
	And how they came after people.
	It's always good to remind ourselves of this because this is what we are living through right now.
	You know, just as Xi Van Fleet said, Mao's America, a survivor's warning.
	She understands that's exactly what this is.
	And we better understand what it is, too.
	It's not woke. It's Marx.
	And these people are completely asleep.
	We were falling for this.
	And the Guangxi Cultural Revolution official records show between 100,000 and 150,000 people were killed by methods like being buried alive, drowning, boiling alive, and disemboweling.
	Local offices of the Communist Party sponsored cannibalism.
	Public records show at least 137 people were eaten by Communist Party members, though some scholars claim there are at least 421 named people who were eaten.
	Let's put this in context, too.
	Part of what happened with Mao's Cultural Revolution And sending people out away from the cities to grow stuff.
	Part of what happened when that was massive starvation.
	That's why you heard in the 1950s, well, you know, eat your, finish your spinach or whatever it is that you don't like on your plate because the kids in China are starving.
	What our parents didn't tell us was the kids in China are starving because of their communist government.
	But anyway, the scene that I showed you a couple weeks ago, the scene from the three-body problem, that film, reenacting a struggle session.
	It could have been based off a story of Wu Fusheng.
	In 1968, a geography instructor named Wu Shufeng was beaten to death by students at the Wuxian Middle School.
	Her body was carried to the flat stones of the river, where another teacher was forced at gunpoint to rip out her heart and liver.
	Back at the school, the pupils barbecued and consumed the organs.
	Because, again, Mao had turned them into the Donner Party.
	Independent researchers in Guangxi counted a total of 421 people who were eaten.
	There are other reports of cannibalism across 27 counties in Guangxi.
	That's two-thirds of all the counties in Guangxi.
	There was one man who was said to have been the so-called fifth category who was beaten to death where he stood.
	He had two kids, one 11, the other 14.
	Local officials in our militia said it was important to eradicate such people.
	So they not only killed those two children, they ate them too.
	This took place in Pubai County, Guangxi, where 35 people were killed and eaten in total.
	Most of them were rich landowners and their families.
	I guess this is where the Marxist revolutionaries of the 1960s said, eat the rich.
	They had some inside knowledge about what was going on and had happened in China, I guess.
	There was one landowner whose entire family was wiped out.
	He had a 17-year-old daughter who was gang-raped by nine people and then ripped open her belly and ate her liver and other organs.
	Frank DeCotter, professor and chairman of humanities at the University of Hong Kong, says, It's not enough to eliminate your class enemy.
	You have to eat his heart.
	So there are very well documented cases of ritual cannibalism.
	There was a hierarchy in the consumption of class enemies.
	Leaders feasted on the heart and liver, mixed with pork, while ordinary villagers were allowed to only peck at the victims' arms and thighs.
	The Cultural Revolution in total killed between 1 and 2 million people lasted for 10 years.
	No, it killed way more than 1 to 2 million people.
	It's more like 80 to 100 million.
	It was initiated by Mao to purge the country of political dissidence, but it was also to come after people who were educated.
	If you were educated, in some cases that was just somebody who wore glasses.
	They say, well, you probably wear glasses because you read a lot.
	Or you have to have them because you want to read.
	That could be your death sentence there.
	And when we go back and we look at these horrendous atrocities in history, whether you're talking about Mao, whether you're talking about Stalin's purges, go to the French Revolution, look at all these different communist revolutions and how vicious it always became.
	It doesn't have to be communism.
	It can be any kind of authoritarianism.
	Look at Hitler. Look at Nazi Germany.
	So, after...
	After this happened, and people went back and looked at it, they did hand out some penalties to some of these officials.
	Some of the participants were prosecuted.
	Some of them got up to 14 years in prison.
	Now, that's less than they give to the January the 6th people.
	While 91 members of the Chinese Communist Party were expelled from the party.
	That is very serious for them because now they are outside of the law.
	They're outlaws, essentially, on their own in a situation where you don't really have anything except to try to scrounge in the black market.
	39 non-party officials were demoted or had their salary cut.
	There you go. That's what this person said.
	And this is what communism is.
	Millions of people died to purge political dissidents.
	They boiled people alive, had cannibalism, and the punishment?
	A salary cut.
	A salary cut. Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	And we're going to talk about where the Western governments are in terms of disinformation.
	Whether you are talking about Pennsylvania or Europe or Germany, they're all saying, well, don't think for yourself.
	Don't do your own research.
	Do and say what we say.
	Elvis. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the oldies channel at a PS radio.com on the oldies channel at a PS radio.com.
	Find them on the oldies channel at a PS radio.com.
	That's right. No matter what happens, they can't take that away from us.
	Disinfo guru in Pennsylvania.
	This is the Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth, as well as an executive director of something called the Pitt Disinformation Lab.
	That's straight from the pit of hell, but it's got two Ts.
	The Disinformation Lab.
	And what they don't tell you is that they're the source of the disinformation.
	They're not studying it.
	They are creating it.
	They're promulgating it.
	So Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth and Pitt Disinformation Lab Executive Director were in a forum last Tuesday, and they were asked how to combat so-called misinformation and disinformation.
	How do we combat that?
	How did we always do that?
	Well, we used to do it with debate, but we don't even have debates for the presidential candidates anymore.
	Nobody wants to talk about issues when they have debates, so why bother to have them?
	They're all just, well, you did this, and you did that, and it's all this ad hominem stuff, and quite frankly, I'm convinced, they convinced me.
	I'm convinced that both of them are bad guys, and that's not just the president.
	That's these other people who are running for Senate or whatever, governor.
	You know, they've got more than enough ammunition to throw at the other guy.
	And they're right about that.
	They don't want to talk about the issues.
	And if they talk about the issues, it's going to be two or three wedge issues that they've had around for decades.
	Even if they've lost one of them, like abortion, they want to bring it back.
	So he says, when you see misinformation, this is what one of the two said.
	This is... Schwanky, who is the Disinformation Lab Executive Director.
	So here's the guy who is putting the disinformation out there.
	He says, when you see misinformation, it's best not to engage with it online because you're helping to amplify it.
	No, just the opposite.
	You engage it and you fight against it.
	You debate it.
	Use critical thinking.
	You cast down their strongholds and their arguments.
	You hold up truth. That's what you're supposed to do.
	That was always the ethic of Christian societies.
	But not anymore. That's one of the reasons why you need to have free speech.
	One thing everyone can do to make sure they're seeing accurate information is to use trusted sources like me.
	He didn't say like me.
	That's what I said. So in elections, that means using the Department of State.
	See, he was saying like me.
	He just didn't put it, he just didn't say it as concisely.
	That means using your county elections office.
	It means using media organizations that adhere to professional journalism standards.
	You know, like your local NPR affiliate.
	He said that with a straight face, I'm sure.
	The NPR affiliate, the standard, the gold standard of truth.
	And it doesn't mean, you know, doing your own research, he said.
	Yeah, don't do your own research.
	Just asking questions and sharing posts from, I don't know, in my case, Uncle Joe, right?
	It means being thoughtful about where your sources are coming from.
	Well, yeah, you should consider your sources, but you should also consider what they're saying.
	You know, even NPR can say something true once in a while, by mistake, I guess, but like a broken clock, except they're not right twice a day.
	They're maybe twice a decade or something.
	The Department of State Election Task Force will partner with CISA. Now, these are the people who are supposed to protect us from cybersecurity attacks, right?
	Instead, it's become like it's going to be a propaganda organization.
	That's what it really has become.
	They'll partner with CISA, the nerve center of the government's censorship branch, to provide voters with accurate, trusted election information.
	And to mitigate threats to elections, such as any speech that they determine to be misinformation.
	Anything that disagrees with them is a threat and must be shut down.
	Well, as all this is happening in Pennsylvania, in Germany, the chief of intelligence there is doing the same thing.
	Isn't this interesting? I mean, it's just like we saw with the lockdowns and everything else.
	It's like it is with the pandemic MacGuffin.
	It's like it is with the climate MacGuffin.
	They've all got the same end goal, and they're all marching in lockstep, doing the same things at the same time.
	The German Interior Ministry continues to defend its controversial and widely criticized plans to restrict the speech, the travel, and the economic activity of political dissidents, writes Eugypius on Substack.
	The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, that's what they call this, I always like to call it, it's like calling the Patriot Act patriotic, okay?
	This is the Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
	Every country on earth, including communist China, has a great constitution that says all kinds of wonderful things about our rights as human beings, but they don't mean it, and they don't enforce it, and they don't obey it themselves.
	Our domestic intelligence service and our political police have sacrificed Substantial popular regard in the face of this campaign, he said.
	According to a poll published last month, a plurality of Germans believe that this BFV, that's their German version of it, but it's the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
	Most Germans believe that it's being used for political purposes.
	And that is every single party except for the Greens.
	They have been the most totalitarian of anyone everywhere.
	I mean, it was the Greens in Switzerland who said, no, we like the wolves killing the sheep.
	There's always the Greens, and I've said they're watermelon Greens.
	They've got a thin veneer of green environmentalism on the outside, but inside, they're all red.
	Not conservative Republican MAGA supporters.
	No, red as in communist red.
	If you look at these people who start talking, who parent all this stuff about red states, and even refer to themselves as red state this and red state that, we got a lot of different media people out there who call themselves red state.
	I look at that, and it's like, if this person is that shallow, that devoid of any historical context, I'm not interested in what they have to say, quite frankly.
	Especially if they're doing news analysis.
	If you're doing news analysis and you don't understand that red has always been the color of anarchy and that this is a game to get you to identify it, and you're a sucker that's going to identify with that, I'm not interested in your analysis whatsoever.
	Red state this and it's just amazing.
	The thing about freedom of expression, he said, the guy who runs it, Thomas Haldenwang, He says, the thing, and he wrote an op-ed piece on one of the German papers.
	Frankfurter Allgemein.
	So, yeah, this guy's hot-dogging it in the local paper.
	Frankfurter. So, he says, the thing about freedom of expression is that it is not carte blanche for enemies of the Constitution.
	Oh, yes, it is.
	Yes, it is. I mean, even somebody like this guy, who is an enemy of the Constitution, gets to speak freely.
	But everybody is supposed to have that right.
	He says there's talk about opinion police and language police, even government security service.
	They say that the BFV discredits political opinions on command as extremists as soon as they depart from the social and political mainstream, or when they embark upon criticism of the government action or the work of the Democratic parties.
	But he says, and so he states the truth there.
	That's exactly what we're doing, right?
	He has to confess it. And then he follows it up with this.
	One thing should be unmistakably clear.
	Freedom of opinion prevails in Germany, and that is a good thing.
	Freedom of opinion is a fundamental element.
	However, what distinguishes a democracy from an autocracy or dictatorship is that, you know, we have to shut this stuff down.
	Look, this is like the people, I love the Second Amendment, but turn in your gun.
	Oh, I don't want to see any abortions happen, but let's make it possible to kill your kid at any stage of life, right?
	They always preface this stuff.
	There's always a big but that gets inserted into all of this.
	We know exactly what these people are doing, and we know that there are organizations that have been pushing this behind the scenes, NGO organizations, and billionaires like Bill Gates.
	He had his ID 2020.
	He wanted everybody to have an ID in 2020.
	Well, that was when they kicked this stuff off, right?
	He was right on schedule, really.
	Started creating the demand, the need, the excuse to make everybody get an ID. He has his immunization agenda, IA 2030.
	He wants everybody, every age, everywhere.
	That's a slogan. And what he means by that when he says everyone, everywhere, every age vaccinated with everything they can think of, everything they can make an excuse for.
	The digital public infrastructure that they're creating, that Gates has funded, is really part of the technocracy plan.
	And Technocracy News has done a good job.
	There is a... Technocracy study course from 1934.
	Because it was in the early 1930s that this really took off.
	That was the time at which H.G. Wells did The Shape of Things to Come.
	Then they turned it into a movie, Things to Come.
	Had Raymond Massey in it and some other famous actors.
	And it was about a constant state of war.
	Between humans. And so this group of people who were technocrats, they understood how things worked, and they were going to use their superior knowledge of technology to impose a rule by them.
	They were the airmen, and they were going to come in and impose a piece on everybody, like a Pax Romagna or something, but it's going to be Pax Technocracy.
	And that was what the book and the movie were about.
	There was also a technocracy study course in 1935.
	You also had the maternal grandfather of Elon Musk, Joshua Haldane, who tried to overthrow the government of Canada and install a technocracy in the 1930s.
	And then when he beat the rap, he beat it out of Canada and went to South Africa.
	So this is something that was all the rage in the 1930s, along with eugenics as well.
	There's a lot of very nasty, elitist stuff that was happening there.
	We're better than you, we'll kill you.
	We're better than you, we will enslave you.
	That type of thing. Eugenics is about killing you.
	The technocracy is about enslaving you.
	These elitists, you're superiors.
	Superior because of their knowledge of technocracy.
	But technocracy news has, from time to time, shown, you can probably look through their archives and find the technocracy study course from 1934.
	They quote it from time to time.
	Said there was seven requirements for technocracy.
	He goes, and here's three of them that relate to the global ID. We're good to go.
	And so there was a technocrat magazine that operated in the 1930s to push that idea.
	There were study courses about it.
	You had people who tried to impose it.
	And then you can fast forward another 40 years in the 1970s.
	You have Zbigniew Brzezinski, who kicked off the Trilateral Commission, was the person they put in charge of the Carter White House.
	The people who really run the government put him in charge.
	It's like people who really run the government put Kissinger in charge during the Nixon administration.
	He had talked about the technocratic age, his book Between Two Ages.
	Where they would be able to anticipate everything that you're going to do because they're tracking everything that you do.
	And Technocrat Magazine, Technocracy, 1937, this quote, Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.
	For the first time in human history, it will be done as a scientific, technical, and engineering problem.
	Technocracy will distribute by means of a certificate of distribution available to every citizen from birth to death.
	And so as a result of that, that's where you get the things like the desire, the love of universal basic income.
	People like Bloomberg.
	You know, we've gone from an agrarian society to an industrial society, and now those of us who are smart are figuring out how to take everybody's jobs because we don't need them.
	What we have to do, though, is figure out how to keep them from coming after us with guillotines.
	This is what he said when he was running for president in 2020.
	Michael Bloomberg. And everybody, everybody, even the places that published his entire quote, Focus on the fact, look at that, he just insulted farmers.
	Remember that? Michael Bloomberg, this city boy, just insulted farmers.
	They've got a complicated task to do, and they've got to figure out how to make ends meet and how to pull all this stuff together on their own, and that's all true.
	But they completely missed what he was saying.
	The fact that we've got to figure out how to pacify people so they don't come after us with guillotines.
	That's what universal basic income is about.
	And he was saying that.
	Andrew Yang was running and that was his key thing.
	And Elon Musk gave him millions of dollars because that's a key thing for the technocrats like Elon Musk.
	To push out universal basic income.
	To pacify people.
	And that's what Trump did in 2020.
	With PPP and the CARES Act and your stimulus check and things like that.
	That's to give people a taste of you stay home and I'll give you a check.
	No strings attached. Well, yeah, there's strings.
	We'll talk about that later. Yeah, that's what it's about.
	Universal basic income.
	So, digital public infrastructure is what they call it, DPI. We used to talk about printers and talk about DPI, dots per inch.
	But no, this is about digital public infrastructure.
	The new scheme unveiled late last year, moving ahead rapidly, is known as 50 in 5.
	50 governments expect to have Orwellian digital infrastructure of tyranny in place within five years.
	Almost a dozen governments, including numerous corrupt kleptocracies and socialist regimes, have volunteered their populations to serve as, quote, first mover, unquote, countries so far.
	The UN's assumption is that every government will eventually impose this on every person on Earth.
	They say in their announcements, quote, all countries, regardless of income level, geography, or where they are in their digital transformation journey, can benefit from being a part of 50 in 5, unquote.
	Joining the campaign helps to ensure countries don't have to tackle the DPI implementation alone or start from scratch, because they've already got a template.
	And they're going to help you do this.
	And the question is, why are we paying for the UN? Why did Trump continue to pay the UN? It's a good place for Nikki Haley to hang out.
	She's very comfortable amongst other people of her ilk.
	But why do we have a UN? Why are we giving them a single cent?
	You can say that about most of what the federal government does.
	But this is a program to undermine.
	And as I said before, when you think about these different global organizations, there's a whole lot of these public-private partnership type things like the World Economic Forum or the Bilderberg Group or whatever.
	They meet sometimes.
	They talk about the World Economic Forum.
	They make a point of talking about that.
	All the rest of them, they make a point about keeping them secret and quiet.
	But there are always, you know, it's like every month, there is just like an LGBT holiday or something.
	one or two of them every month.
	And there's one or two of these things every month somewhere.
	And these people are always going to them and meeting in private and exchanging notes where there's no record of anything, where they're not using the surveillance system that they're setting up for everybody else.
	They just meet in public. Meet in private, I should say.
	Meet in private and talk to each other and exchange what they're going to do.
	And so they come up with these things with the UN and it's very useful for these quasi-corporate bodies like the World Economic Forum or Bilderberg.
	They can, especially the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab can get out there and he can get fundraising and do this publicly.
	These people can, you know, fund this because they don't have global taxes yet.
	That's about to change with carbon taxes.
	But, of course, the carbon taxes will wind up going to these people, just like the taxes that you pay right now to the IRS typically go to the military-industrial complex or somebody else that's part of the crony capitalism that's coming out of Washington, feathering the nest of the greenwashed investments and all the rest of this stuff.
	So, again, the UN will develop the program, then they give it to these other organizations to kind of shepherd it through.
	So it's like the UN is the legislative body, whereas the other ones are going to bring the executive aspect of it and the funding aspect of it.
	And so, as we're looking at this, and you remember when Ramaswamy was running, he and Musk had a real heart-to-heart conversation.
	They're talking about how it's just hard to find good help in America.
	We've got to bring people in from other countries because they're so much cheaper.
	And the two of them were in total agreement about that, Ramaswamy and Elon Musk.
	We just, you know, these two people came here to enjoy the benefits of a system that their ancestors did not build, a system that they seek to destroy.
	And how we got to get more people who aren't Americans and don't buy into this system any year?
	Because it'll work cheaply or whatever.
	And so they wanted a lot of foreign immigration.
	Governor Abbott, just beginning of this year, Led an economic development mission to India.
	What did he do? Did he come back and report to anybody about it?
	You know, it's kind of interesting when you see these governors like Brian Kemp in Georgia or this guy in Virginia.
	What is his name? Yunkin.
	Glenn Yunkin. He goes there and they go to World Economic Forum.
	And immediately the conservatives, especially the MAGA conservatives, selling us out, selling us out to those people, the World Economic Forum.
	They say, well, we're just getting jobs.
	You know, we just want these businesses to come here and open up factories and give you jobs.
	That's why we're there. That's the same thing that Trump said.
	But, of course, they don't say that Trump is there selling us out to Klaus Schwab, do they?
	I think all of them are doing it.
	And I think Abbott was doing the same thing.
	He's going to India. And visiting there to try to, he said, get investment in America.
	It's kind of interesting.
	About a week, week and a half ago, we had the fact that Amazon's Just Walkout store is not doing too well.
	They're shutting them down. And it turns out that, you know, they're not using artificial intelligence to figure out what you're buying.
	They've got a thousand people in India.
	With video cameras watching people and writing down what they're buying.
	That's their artificial intelligence.
	What a scam these people are.
	They will use anything that they can to lie to us and to enslave us.
	We'll be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the jazz channel at APS radio.com and the APS radio app and leave the stress behind
	I
	How lovely you are!
	I love you!
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	And now, The David Nutt Show.
	you Well, before we leave the technocracy plans and get into war, this is the next place I want to take us.
	Let's take a look at what's going on with cars.
	Because you should understand that cars are really kind of a metaphor for you with the government.
	Cars represent one of the last things that we have that has private ownership and freedom.
	And so what do you want to do about that?
	Well, you want to tax it out of existence.
	You want to ban it, ultimately.
	You want to surveil it.
	You want to tie it down because it represents freedom.
	And they really understand that after what happened in 2020, don't they?
	The car was the one thing that let us escape the regulations.
	Boy, they had everybody tied down and locked up, whether you wanted to use a bus or a subway or a plane or a train.
	Oh, put your mask on. Do you have this?
	Do you have that? But with a car, they couldn't do it.
	It's a big, big loophole for their lockdown plans.
	So they've got to get the car.
	So California Governor Newsom has announced a plan to install hundreds of AI surveillance cameras in Oakland, California.
	He said, well, the crime in Oakland is really bad.
	So this is going to help us to keep you safe.
	What good is it going to do?
	And they're going to put in about 500 high-tech cameras.
	These are, who knows, they just identified as high-tech.
	Who knows, is it biometric?
	Real-time, what is it?
	No details about that.
	But in his press release statement, he calls it an investment.
	He says it is a step forward.
	It's for public safety, he says.
	And in one city, 480 high-tech cameras, nearly 500 in one city.
	It's going to build safer, stronger communities for all Californians.
	Do you believe that?
	Of course you don't. It's going to be used just as we see happening in the UK. It's going to be used against drivers.
	It'll be used against internal combustion engines.
	It'll be used for things like, well, you can't enter the city at certain times.
	Because there's just too much of this CO2 going out all the time, right?
	We've got to control that.
	So we're going to shut down certain areas to private cars, and we're going to tax you.
	Maybe we're going to ban you driving an internal combustion engine and get a big fine like they do in London with their ultra-low emission zones.
	But it'll be used to follow you and then eventually to ban this.
	But it's not going to make them any safer.
	Why did this all of a sudden happen?
	Did Oakland somehow change?
	Why, yes! And there's an interesting thing that happened as all this was happening in Oakland and other places.
	They got these Soros district attorneys that when people would commit crimes, they would turn them back out on the streets.
	It didn't matter how many times the police arrested them for these crimes.
	So you think having a surveillance camera that's going to identify somebody who committed a robbery or raped someone or shot someone or, you know, just general theft going in, shoplifting or something, a shoplifting gang, you think knowing who these people are is going to help?
	The guy that killed that cop up in New York had 21 priors.
	They just kept letting him out again.
	So it's the point of having a surveillance camera.
	Certainly not to make people safe.
	It's not to do anything to the criminals because they've already taken care of that at the district attorney's office.
	Now, it's going to be used against the people.
	That's how they're going to use this.
	So, as I said at the top of the program, People are starting to call these encampments, and they're starting to get big encampments, and it's not just in California.
	It's in other states as well.
	Sedona, Arizona. That's on Route 66.
	That's even in the song.
	Matt King Cole.
	Sedona, Arizona, I think.
	But anyway, we're starting to go back to the Dust Bowl, I guess, is where we're headed with all this stuff.
	Headed back to Hoovervilles.
	That's what they reference in this Epoch Times headline.
	Automobile Bidenvilles.
	The new shanty towns amid U.S. housing affordability crisis.
	When people couldn't afford housing during the Great Depression, they built shanty towns from scrap construction supplies, and they named them Hoovervilles after then-President Herbert Hoover.
	Today, Americans increasingly live out of their cars because they can't afford housing.
	If history is any guide, will the parking lots full of Americans soon be known as Bidenvilles?
	But while this is happening, California can afford to put 500 spy cameras, high-tech cameras, not going to be cheap, in one city.
	But, you know, we've got to have some more taxes from you so we can have these, so you can live out of your car.
	The problem has gotten so bad that Sedona, Arizona, recently set aside a parking lot exclusively for these homeless workers.
	The city is even installing toilets and showers.
	For the new occupants. Isn't that kind of them?
	Yeah, the government is always there to help us, you know?
	Sorry, you know, we have messed up everything by design to the extent that you can't afford a home.
	But don't worry, we're there for you.
	Because it's one thing we know about, and that's toilets.
	Because we're always slinging that stuff ourself.
	The average home in the city sells for $930,000.
	That's the average home. While most of the housing available for rent is not apartments, but luxury homes targeted at wealthy people on vacation.
	I don't know what the thing is about that area.
	I don't know anything about Arizona.
	I guess Route 66 is not the attraction anymore.
	They've shut that down. With such a shortage of middle-class housing and with starter homes essentially non-existent, low- and even middle-income blue-collar workers have nowhere to go at night but their back seat.
	Very much like America's Great Depression in the 1930s, this marks a serious regression of our national standard of living.
	Shanty towns were not prevalent in the 1920s.
	But, or in the 1910s, nor were they around in the panic of 1907, which set off one of the worst recessions in American history.
	But Americans in the Great Depression faced such a cost-of-living crisis by the time they got to the 1930s that many were forced to accept a standard of living below what their parents and even their grandparents had.
	What they don't talk about is the fact that this was the last fourth turning, the Great Depression.
	People living in shady towns and people living in their cars.
	And we didn't see that happening in the 1920s, the 1910s, the 19 aughts.
	We saw it happen in the 1930s when the Great Depression was happening, when you had the fourth turning that was going on there.
	And so fast forward 80 to 90 years and here we are.
	Countless families are in the same boat.
	Many young people today don't think they'll ever be able to achieve the American dream of homeownership their parents and grandparents achieved.
	We have the worst inflation of 40 years, rising interest rates, a collapse of real earnings, a real step backwards financially.
	Because every fourth turning is accompanied, always accompanied, by massive economic unrest.
	Good news is this too will pass.
	It is a cycle. The question is what are they going to put in place afterwards?
	That's for you and I to have something to say about it right now because they're in the midst of it and we can still affect this.
	The housing problem is not limited to wealthy towns in Arizona, however.
	It is systemic. The monthly mortgage payments on a median price home have doubled since January of 2021.
	Rents are at record highs.
	Like the Great Depression, this disaster stems from bad public policy.
	I remember when everything got locked down, and you remember it created all this, you know, log jams and broken supply chains, and people were destroying milk and vegetables and potatoes on their farms because they couldn't get them to market.
	You had everybody running out of toilet paper because all the institutions that people worked at or restaurants that they ate at were closed and they only had toilet paper in certain formats so they could get to those places.
	It put such a shock through the system.
	And it happened overnight.
	And all of a sudden, you know, when we had these two weeks to flatten the curve, in those two weeks, I remember talking about what happened to the unemployment numbers and comparing them to what happened with the Great Depression.
	I said, you had the stock market crash in 1929, but it took a while until the early 1930s before the unemployment rate really shot sky high.
	At first, the shock was to people on Wall Street, and they're jumping out of the windows and things like that.
	But then it took a while for it to percolate through with everything.
	But I said, because Trump shut this down by fiat, by dictate, We immediately achieved numbers that were greater than they were in the 1930s, at the peak of the Great Depression.
	We got an instantaneous unemployment rate that exceeded the Great Depression.
	Of course, the good news about it was that they started pulling back with that.
	But that was the net result of that.
	And it just underscores how devastating it can be To have a dictatorship like the Trump administration and followed up by the Biden administration.
	The presidency, folks, is the problem.
	It is not the solution.
	Our vision of the presidency, of being all-powerful and being able to do anything with an executive order, that is the problem.
	And it isn't going to be solved by either of these two clowns who have used that.
	It's not going to be solved by RFK Jr.
	either. Not anybody who's running for president.
	And it's not going to be solved by the partisan hacks that populate the rank and file of the Democrat and the Republican Party.
	Because they have completely bought into this myth of the omnipotent president.
	This godlike dictator that's going to turn into, that has already turned into, both of these guys have had their Boromir moments.
	Since rent and virtually all other prices have risen so much faster than incomes over the past three years, even renting is unaffordable today.
	They make it three years because they don't want to include 2020, because that was Trump, you see.
	And they all do this.
	This is Zero Hedge that's doing it.
	They've turned into, unfortunately, Trump cheerleaders as well.
	Even renting is unaffordable today, so many people have to go into debt to keep a roof over their head, and for some, that's a car roof.
	Hoover certainly deserved some blame for the Great Depression.
	By the way, this is on Zero Hedge, but it's the epic times.
	They've always been Trump cheerleaders.
	So they said that Hoover deserved blame for it.
	That's right. Isn't it funny?
	You know, he wasn't the only one. They point out that it was progressives of both parties in Congress that said, oh, the government can fix this.
	We'll do this. We'll do that.
	Let's have more government. That's the solution.
	Have even more government. So yeah, the blame was for all of Congress as well as for the President, but who do they attribute it to?
	Hoover. Why? Because he's the President.
	He's got the most, he is supposed to be leading.
	And if he's not leading, if he's letting other people lead, if he is doing the wrong thing or just being passive, you know, like we keep saying, well, you know, poor Trump, he just deceived all these people that he hired.
	All these people were just really bad and they used him.
	Poor thing. No, it's his fault if he was passive, ineffective, or if it was his policy.
	We always attribute it to them.
	We attribute it to Hoover. We attribute it to Obama.
	We attribute it to Biden.
	We don't attribute it to Trump, though, do we?
	Not if you're conservative, you don't.
	So similarly, President Joe Biden deserves blame for constantly advocating runaway government spending.
	Today's multi-trillion dollar deficits are also made possible by the big spenders in Congress who come from both parties.
	If this bipartisan prodigality of Washington continues, Bidenvilles will only become more widespread as the housing affordability crisis worsens.
	So, again, well, this was originally from the Washington Times, picked up by the Epoch Times, then picked up by Zero Hedge.
	And they will not attribute any...
	Congress, both parties of Congress are to blame.
	Biden is to blame, but not Trump.
	Yeah, the immaculate perception is what they're selling you.
	Behind the EV push, a wealth transfer from red to blue regions.
	Now, we already know this person is deeply missing any contacts because they're already couching things in terms of red and blue.
	Another article from the Epoch Times, another article that is on Zero Hedge.
	President Biden's new EV mandates will likely prove to be a sizable wealth transfer from rural regions of America to urban sections.
	I'm going to skip the color designation.
	This is just too much like professional wrestling and collegiate or professional sports.
	I'm just sick of red and blue.
	I really am. March 20th, the EPA finalizes tailpipe emission rules for the auto industry to begin in just three years, 2027.
	We're only three years away from the fact that they are going to demand that one-third of new car sales be plug-in electric vehicles in three years.
	And that two-thirds of them will be by 2032.
	This is a dramatic increase from current EV sales.
	I guess we've got our 50 in 5.
	This would be one-third in 3.
	Why don't they come up with that?
	Do they need my help?
	Very catchy slogan.
	Maybe they don't want you to think of it that way.
	One-third of the cars in three years.
	Gone. This isn't industrial policy, said an energy analyst, Robert Bryce.
	In reality, it's a type of class warfare that will prevent low- and middle-income consumers from being able to afford new cars.
	Yes, yes. And what is the basis for this?
	Well, it was this climate treaty that we had that was never ratified by Senate.
	John Kerry self-ratified it.
	He said, Obama and I are going to ratify this, and Trump left it in his entire four years.
	Biden, right after the election, oh yeah, okay, I'll get rid of it, and then it's brought right back in.
	So, it's a kind of class warfare to keep you from being able to afford a new car.
	But I guess you'll still be able to use it for a while as a broken-down, non-running shelter.
	You just have to find somebody's lawn to park it on, I guess.
	The report states that the average model year 2021 EV would cost $48,698 more to own, almost $50,000 more to own over a 10-year period, If you didn't have $22 billion in government subsidies and favors given to the people who buy it and the people who make it, that's $50,000 extra for the car.
	I mean, you look at how expensive they are.
	$10,000, $20,000 more expensive than internal combustion engines, even with all the needless complications put on these internal combustion engines by the EPA. They're still $10,000 to $20,000 more expensive.
	And the manufacturers are still losing money.
	So they've got to have massive subsidies, another $50,000 per car.
	This is what happens when the government does central planning.
	And you've got to ask yourself, what is the objective here?
	Because it is not the MacGuffin.
	That is not the objective.
	The MacGuffin is just the thing that motivates people.
	Oh, CO2. Oh, we've got to get rid of it.
	No, that's not what it is.
	It's about getting rid of the car.
	It's about getting rid of you.
	It's about getting rid of your liberty.
	These dollars do not take into account the additional dollars that gas car owners will likely pay for their vehicles as manufacturers are forced to make fewer of them.
	And of course, some of this will be offset with some taxes on people who buy an internal combustion engine that runs off of fuel.
	The new EPA mandate is aimed, quote, at accommodating a very narrow segment of the auto-buying public.
	Welp the white Democrats who live in a handful of liberal communities, said Bryce, who is the analyst they're quoting here.
	EV ownership is largely defined by class, by ideology, and by geography.
	And I think this is what is interesting about this article, is how the profile breaks down demographically and geographically, Of the EV buyer.
	In a February analysis of EV buyers, he said 57% of them earn more than $100,000 annually.
	75% are male.
	87% are white.
	Additionally, EV buyers are overwhelmingly Democrats, with 71% of Republicans saying in a Gallup poll that they would not consider owning an electric vehicle.
	Maybe that's one of the reasons why Musk is reaching out to conservatives, right?
	He's always been the central P.T. Barnum of the EV industry.
	And he became the world's richest man doing that.
	Is he there to get your trusts so you'll trust him?
	You know? Is he playing 40 chess like Trump did?
	One-third of EV buyers live in California.
	If you count all the EVs in North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Mississippi, West Virginia, Alabama, Montana, Idaho, they account for less than 1% of the total U.S. sales.
	Ironically, Biden is the worst thing that ever happened in this industry, said one of them.
	EVs have become Biden cars.
	So, a number of Democrat-controlled states, California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, are on track to ban the sale of gas-powered cars and trucks, new ones, by 2035.
	Of course, that's the California regulation that they have signed on to copy and to mimic.
	And so, with all this happening, Musk has announced, first of all, Reuters came out with a statement.
	Saying that Tesla sales are way down and Musk has decided not to release a very cheap EV that had been planned.
	And he pushed back against that and said, Reuters is lying.
	And then he said, but we do have on the way Tesla robo taxis that we're going to unveil on 8-8, August the 8th.
	There you go. And their shares of stocks jumped on that news.
	So he's going to have robo taxis that are there.
	And even as there are trials underway, talking about how bad his autopilot is, the people that have been killed, a lot of...
	Lawsuits about that.
	One of them, as a matter of fact, that is rolling out as we speak.
	And information has come out about how they navigate.
	Of course, we've always known they use cameras rather than LIDAR, a form of kind of radar.
	They use visual cameras.
	And they look at the lines on the road.
	Not a very sophisticated way of doing it, frankly, and it's one of the reasons why they have repeatedly crashed into barriers.
	If they're relying on those lines, all of a sudden the lines disappear or get ambiguous, and you've had this situation happen many times where there is a fork on the interstate, And kind of makes a V, gets to that V there, and it doesn't know which way to go, and it goes straight ahead.
	And since it doesn't have any kind of LIDAR that's looking at the obstacles ahead of it, it doesn't recognize a concrete barrier or a semi-trailer or police or fire truck.
	It doesn't recognize that.
	So it's just looking at lanes.
	And it goes full speed into the concrete barrier that's there at the end of that, you know, Lane divergence, that V that's there.
	That's what happened to this guy.
	He hit it full speed, 70 plus miles an hour.
	Extinction Rebellion attacks an electric vehicle at the New York Auto Show.
	Oh, they didn't know that it was an electric automobile?
	Were they angry, thinking that it might have autopile on it?
	No, it wasn't that.
	They don't want cars of any type.
	Of any type.
	And neither do the politicians that are pushing you into an EV. The key with all of that was it has to be a plugin.
	That means that they want you on their control grid, the power grid.
	And they're doing that even as they are deconstructing the power grid.
	So we know what the outcome is going to be.
	As a matter of fact, the crash I was talking about happened back in 2018.
	And as part of this discovery and part of the testimony here, they've got a Tesla engineer on there, and he's talking about how the system works.
	And it is kind of interesting to see the Washington Post focus on this, because they used to make all kinds of excuses for Elon Musk, and now they have all kinds of attacks on him.
	Uh, because that's just the way everything is politicized.
	Now, uh, it was always a bad idea.
	He, even before he bought Twitter and started doing conservative things, it was a bad idea, but now you see the mainstream media taking every opportunity to attack Elon Musk and his marketing materials, the company's autopilot driver assist system is cast as a technological Marvel that uses quote advanced cameras, sensors, and computing power on quote to steer, accelerate, and break automatically.
	And even changes lanes so you don't get stuck behind slow cars or trucks, it said.
	However, under oath, a Tesla engineer last year described its software as fairly basic in one respect, the way that it steers on its own.
	He said if there are clearly marked lane lines, the system will follow the lane lines.
	The question is, what does it do when those get intermittent or when they're not there at all?
	So this trial, it goes back to the death in March 2018.
	This was a driver, 38 years old, killed.
	The Tesla he was in was on autopilot and went straight into a highway barrier in California after getting confused by what the company's lawyers described in the court documents as a, quote, faded and nearly obliterated lane, a lane line.
	Again, one of those V-shaped things.
	And it's not the only thing that keys off of these different lane lines.
	A lot of cheaper cars do that as well, but it costs a great deal to have that upgrade for autopilot on your car.
	His car hit the barrier at 71 miles an hour, pulverizing the front end, twisting it into an unrecognizable heap.
	He was pronounced dead hours later.
	In the months preceding the crash, his vehicle had swerved in a similar location 11 times.
	According to internal Tesla data discussed by his lawyers during a court hearing last month.
	According to the data, the car corrected itself seven times, four other times it required his intervention.
	It was allegedly playing a game on his phone when the crash occurred.
	Was that not a metaphor for our entire society?
	We're kind of all on autopilot, right?
	Yeah, this whole system is very complicated, but it seems to work.
	Let's just break out some video games and not think about it anymore.
	Musk said his cars operating in autopilot are safer than those controlled by humans.
	Which humans? His friends who are high on drugs like him?
	I don't know about that.
	I've been driving for quite some time, as a matter of fact, and I have yet to drive my car straight into a barrier without even putting the brakes on.
	Steve Wozniak, early adopter of the Tesla stuff, said, I love my Tesla, but he goes, don't use autopilot.
	He said, that thing is trying to kill you.
	He said, get one, I love it, but don't put it on autopilot.
	Well, that was before this crash.
	That guy evidently didn't listen to him.
	And then we have another EV startup.
	A company called Canoo.
	C-A-N-O-O. And what they wanted to do was exactly what Tesla is talking about doing.
	Having electric vehicles that are taxis.
	Except the Canoo thing is like a van type of deal.
	Driverless van.
	So you get into this thing and it supposedly is going to drive you around.
	However, and it's had a lot of press.
	I've seen articles about Canoe for quite some time.
	But as I point out, the private jet expenses of the CEO were twice the company's entire revenue for 2023.
	Something is really wrong about our system, isn't it?
	And you see it in this story about Canoe, and you see it in the story about Trump's truth social.
	I've said for the longest time that the distortion is introduced into our economy by Wall Street.
	You know, when we talk about capitalism and Wall Street, that is not a free market.
	In a free market, we have mom and pops, you know, got stores on Main Street, and they're trying to compete against the other guys, better service, better products, better prices, whatever.
	That's a very different situation than Wall Street.
	If you get a company that's publicly trading on Wall Street, you can lose money forever.
	I first saw this when we were competing against Blockbuster.
	Blockbuster was a very effective company put together by Wayne Huizenga, who got wealthy.
	I guess his first few billion dollars came from garbage collection, waste management industries or something like that.
	And some people came up with the idea of Blockbuster, which is a really, at the time, really big video store, about 6,000 square feet and lots of videos.
	And he liked that concept.
	And so he bought it from those guys.
	You know, they were kind of like the Ray Kroc of the McDonald's franchise.
	So he was the guy who bought it and then took it to the next, put it everywhere and started replicating it because he had Wall Street.
	Well, I don't know if he had Wall Street capital with it, but then it was bought by By Sumner Redstone, who owned Viacom.
	Viacom was the parent company of CBS and Paramount Studios and a whole bunch of other entertainment and media companies.
	And he bought Blockbuster, and they never made a profit.
	They were very profitable under Wayne Huizenga, but they never made a profit under Sumner Redstone and Viacom.
	But they never shut down for more than 20 years.
	They used them, even though they were losing money, they used them because, again, remember that Paramount, owned by Viacom, was one of the seven big studios that were out there.
	But they used them to establish a different kind of payment paradigm that was profitable for the studios, but not for the small mom-and-pop video stores.
	It's called Pay-Per-View, where they would still rent the videos out, but...
	The video stores didn't own them.
	You know, they just rented them from the studios.
	And so they used that and they started changing the windows of, you know, when they had access to it.
	But the bottom line is that they were able to operate for a couple of decades without making any money and just keep going.
	And even after they broke out Blockbuster's stock separate from Viacom, they were still able to keep it going because of the stock market.
	And so we're seeing that type of thing with Canoe.
	We're seeing that type of thing with Trump's Truth Social.
	They don't have to have much revenue.
	As a matter of fact, Trump For the entire year, you know, first everybody starts to, you know, they offer the stock out there and the price is really high, and then their financial statement comes out.
	And they only had gross revenues of $4 million.
	That's like a McDonald's franchise, you know, single location, $4 million.
	That's the gross revenue.
	That's not their profit.
	The gross revenue of $4 million.
	And then off of that, you know, like I said, it's not their profit.
	They lost everything.
	56, 58 million, we'll get to it, for the year.
	Gross revenues of 4 million, you lose 58.
	Now, nobody else would be able to survive that if it wasn't some kind of a stock market scam.
	And I say scam, because that's not capitalism.
	That is the same type of system that the federal government uses with the Federal Reserve.
	You just operate at a loss, and you continue to do so infinitely.
	And you just, you know, it's like being able to print money out of thin air.
	You know, Blockbuster can run for 20 years without ever losing money big time every year.
	Truth Social can have sales of only $4 million and lose $58 million, and then they value the company at $9 billion with a B? This is a messed up system.
	And here's another one, Canoe.
	Canoe's CEO. The CEO spent $1.7 million on jets, private jets.
	But their gross revenue, all of their gross revenue, was $886,000.
	And he spends $1.7 on planes.
	And this is because it's an electric vehicle, because it's self-driving, supposedly.
	There's articles, happy articles about the future and all the rest of this stuff all over the place about Canoe for years.
	And still, they've only got growth revenue of less than a million dollars, $886,000.
	He spends twice that on jet stuff.
	And then they had a loss of $302 million last year.
	This is even more extreme than Trump's.
	They have revenue of less than a million, but they have losses of 300 million.
	And you go back and you look at the social media companies and internet companies that were begun by the CIA's InCutel and these other venture capital firms that were populated with executives from the intelligence community.
	They allowed Google and many of these others to operate for years, for years, losing massive amounts of money And offering their products for free.
	And that is what's happening with the electric vehicle stuff.
	Canoe just received a boost with a contract from the U.S. Postal System for six delivery vans.
	Wow. Wow.
	Big sale there.
	Six. Not 6,000.
	Not 60. Six.
	This is all such a scam, but we'll be right back.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Thank you.
	Well, welcome back, and let me catch up with some of the comments here on Rockfin.
	Doug Alug, thank you very much for the tip.
	Thank you. On Rumble, Delta Mike, 83-84, most Americans are in denial, thinking it can never happen here.
	That's true. That's true about the poverty.
	It's true about the control, the tyranny, about war, even.
	On Rumble, Atomic Dog says, this is true.
	I live in southern Arizona, and I have started seeing people living in vans at the park I frequent.
	It's sad that people can't afford even an apartment.
	Rumble Jr. Barner said, I worked storm trouble in West Virginia about 10 years ago.
	I've never seen poverty like these people.
	Still living in shacks in the woods with dirt floors.
	Unbelievable. Well, that's true, and certainly we don't want to have that kind of poverty, but we also need to understand that whatever is coming, there are still ways that people can be happy.
	I've looked many times at the writings of people who lived in what we would consider to be unbelievable poverty.
	Only just a few generations ago, that kind of thing that he's talking about there in West Virginia was very common.
	And those people had something that was very valuable.
	A couple of things. They had freedom.
	And they had a faith in God and a relationship with Those are the types of things that money cannot buy.
	And as much as we love our modern comforts, and I'm certainly not interested in giving them up or discounting them, but there are greater things.
	And that's what we need to understand, I think, as we look at this ahead.
	And not worry about this, but to focus on what is important.
	We need to focus on Christ as King, not Trump as President, or Biden as President, or having a presidential political fix to these problems that we have in life.
	On Rumble, KWD64, as long as people get a new iPhone every year and can post on social media, things are getting better.
	Yeah, and to that, they will probably add a robot to follow you around.
	I think that's really going to be a key part of it.
	On Rockfin, Guard Goldsmith.
	Good to see you, Guard. He says, I was disappointed again in RFK Jr.
	saying he would work. To have a constitutional amendment to back abortion.
	Yep, I've got that here as well.
	Also, his retraction on the J6 people as being political prisoners.
	There have been as much political prisoners as Ed Snowden and Julian Assange, who he said he would pardon, but he would look at the J6ers on a case-by-case basis.
	Look, even if...
	Somebody got violent.
	It doesn't justify decades in prison.
	They don't give people decades in prison and these jurisdictions for murder or rape.
	So, yeah, it was a political thing.
	And on RockFan, Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. As a matter of fact, let me talk a little bit about some of the emails that I got from some of you.
	I just talked about the Tesla robo-taxi coming on August the 8th.
	Alfred commented on that. He said it's going to stretch the definition of the English language by quite some considerable degree by laying on a human clad and spandex suit reporting to be a humanoid robot driving a Tesla taxi.
	We've all seen the carnage unleashed on the roads by Tesla autonomous vehicles.
	Musk will be doomed to fail quite spectacularly should he foolishly supply a totally driverless Tesla in August. But it's one of the things he says but Musk is the world's appointed showman so the show must go on.
	Yes, and he is the appointed showman for the Green Agenda, for the CIA and the military-industrial complex.
	He's their guy putting the satellites up.
	They're going to make sure that he weathers whatever this is going to be.
	They can turn the electric vehicles into a loss leader, and they don't care.
	They've got unlimited amounts of money they can channel to him through hopium on the stock market, through subsidies from the Federal Reserve.
	They don't care about any of that stuff.
	He says, apparently the Tesla robo-taxi software will allow Tesla owners to allow their Tesla cars to be used as robo-taxis.
	Who in their right mind would allow their private vehicle to be used to transport complete strangers from A to B? Well, there are some services out there where people do rent their cars to do that.
	But, you know, especially when you start talking about a taxi, that's a different thing than even renting it to somebody to drive it as a rental car.
	You know, you're talking about with a taxi, you're talking about picking up drunk people and vomit on the floor.
	That's what I'm thinking. You know, you start talking about a taxi.
	The only people who do that are the taxi companies and the car rental companies.
	Just imagine the legal ramifications involved when private individuals allow their Teslas to be used as robo-taxis.
	Who's responsible when the Tesla plunges off a cliff and sends all occupants to an untimely demise?
	Will it be Tesla? Will it be the car rental?
	Well, it's not going to be Tesla. We've seen that from the many trials already.
	They always seem to find a way to wiggle out of that.
	The insurance companies will read the riot act to all Tesla owners and warn them if they allow their Tesla to be used as a robo-taxi, they ain't insured.
	And, you know, they may have the capability to track it and make some kind of inferences about it.
	Who knows? The cars have become not only smartphones, but surveillance devices, which are where the smartphones are.
	As I pointed out last week, China's got a very large smartphone company that's now just introduced their first car.
	Eric Peters and I have always said, they're turning the cars into appliances, specifically into a smartphone, which has become an appliance.
	Water fluoridation.
	I've talked about this trial that is ongoing, finally coming to trial, and it's been a long time getting to court.
	And the cover-up actually goes back to the Trump administration.
	It goes back to 2020.
	Yes, there was a lot of blockage that was put in there, obstruction that was done by the guy that calls himself Rachel Levine.
	I call him Dick Devine.
	His role name's Richard. But it goes back to Trump's U.S. Surgeon General.
	Who was covering this stuff up before the tranny got put in place by Joe Biden.
	This guy, if you remember him, he was one of the key despots in this whole racket, the Surgeon General that was there at the time.
	His name was Jerome Adams.
	Do you remember him? I remember how despicable he was as one of the key spokespersons out there, because they had a lot of them.
	You know, you had Fauci, you had Birx, you had Adams, you had Fauci, you had Francis Collins, and you had the FDA guys and everything.
	But Jerome Adams was one of those guys.
	And in his capacity as Surgeon General, He was blocking the scientists who worked, other government scientists who worked with the EPA and everything, talking about the issues with water fluoridation.
	He was blocking them from getting anything done about it.
	And this article from Brenda Belletti, Ph.D., she said...
	The CDC has called water fluoridation one of the ten great public health scams.
	I'm sorry, achievements of the 20th century.
	Yeah, I guess it really kind of set the template for them, didn't it?
	We've got a pattern here.
	You have large corporations paid inordinate amounts of money to dump poison onto our water supply or inject it into our bloodstreams.
	That's really kind of the CDC's business model, isn't it?
	That's their brief, I guess, from the government.
	And so going back to 2020, this guy, Jerome Adams, who at the same time was pushing masks, six-foot distance and lockdown and all the rest of the stuff.
	Stay locked down until we get this experimental jab ready for you.
	He was also blocking any discovery about...
	Fluoride. And of course, they know that at certain concentrations, it lowers IQ. And the question is, when you dump any medication into the water supply, how do you control the dosage?
	And are you going to give the same dosage to a baby that you give to an adult male?
	If you just dump it in the water supply, how in the world can you, and again, these people are focusing on whether or not this type of fluoride, and again, there's different types of fluoride, this is an industrial waste fluoride, a product of the nuclear and aluminum industry.
	That they came up with this scam.
	Instead of having to pay to dispose of this, or instead of having to pay to repurpose it as rat poison or something like that, let's dump it into the water supply and have the cities pay us for the privilege.
	But over and above, whether it is harmful in and of itself, even something that is good becomes harmful in a high dosage.
	And I've mentioned people dying from stunts where they drink a lot of water.
	Water, in and of itself, is necessary for human life.
	However, you've had situations where for stunts, they would have the most recent one that happened.
	This happened several times.
	The most recent one was a radio station, and they had a bunch of contestants there.
	And they, I don't know, were playing a game, something about the game.
	They had to keep drinking water, and they couldn't go to the bathroom.
	And they had a woman who died.
	Just because she drank so much water that it diluted her blood or something like that, and she died from too much water.
	So, how much fluoride is too much?
	And how do you control the dosage if you dump it into the water?
	That ought to be the talking point, and yet I don't see anybody talking about that aspect of it.
	That ought to stop the mass fluoridation of the water supply right there.
	Why would we ever want to mass medicate through the water supply?
	And that's why this bill...
	Out of Tennessee to say, well, you're not going to, we've got scientists saying we want to put mRNA in lettuce.
	Well, why would you do that?
	You can't control the dosage.
	And that's the very point of that.
	They said, well, you've got multiple scientists who are working on this, so let's be proactive and not wait for people to get hurt.
	Let's talk about how you're not going to do that here.
	And we're going to treat it like a pharmaceutical.
	If you're going to put drugs in it, we're going to treat it like a pharmaceutical.
	Well, the water ought to be treated like a pharmaceutical.
	In the water, you also don't know what the dosage is.
	Same argument. And it is not paranoid conspiracy theories.
	It's rational thought.
	Dosage makes a difference.
	So Jerome Adams, Trump's Surgeon General, stopped the...
	The scientists who were putting this out and blocked information from it.
	One of the scientists, one of the people there working on this was Ricks.
	He stopped him from co-signing with eight previous chief dental officers and releasing a letter supporting the community water fluoridation and celebrating its anniversary.
	So not only did he shut scientists who were making these statements down, but he also celebrated it.
	And that was under Trump.
	And then this article from Paul, he said, I thought you'd be interested in this, and yes, I am very interested in it.
	Religious faith can be turned off by magnetic transcranial stimulation, scientists find.
	This is a substack from Igor Chuddov.
	He says, your tin foil hats will not help you this time.
	He says, many of us hold strong religious beliefs.
	Religions are foundational not only for individuals, but to support entire societies.
	And so, who is it that would like to shut this down?
	I mean, when I first looked at this, I thought, well, regardless of whether they can do that or not, who would fund a study?
	Who out there would say, how can we turn off people's religious faith or something?
	How can we damage them?
	So they don't have religious faith.
	Because again, this is a damaging of somebody.
	This is like saying, well, guess what?
	You know, I can make people blind by doing this or that to their brain.
	I can give them a frontal lobotomy and they can't do this or that.
	And if I shoot this into there, then I can get where they don't believe in God or something like that.
	Whatever this is. Who is it that's funding this?
	Our government. Why would our government do that?
	Why would our government look at some way that they could damage people's brains to where they couldn't understand that there's a God?
	To make them, to dumb them down to that degree.
	And even more so, they didn't tell people what they were signing up for.
	This is, again, something we've seen over and over again from the government.
	It's something that the EPA was doing to people when they hooked them up In 2012, as I was leaving North Carolina, the group I was working with got involved with the fact that the EPA there at Research Triangle Park was hooking people up to diesel, exposing them to 72 times the level that EPA said was safe, and they were looking for people who had respiratory and heart issues.
	And they wanted to make a case, evidently, to raise the standard or something.
	But that was the time that EPA was doing a big push about fine particulate matter.
	Can't have fireplaces, can't have barbecues, can't have diesel, can't have all this stuff.
	We've got to shut it down. And Lisa Jackson, who was Obama's EPA person, secretary, Was in Congress saying more people are dying.
	I'm not saying getting sick. I'm saying they are dying.
	More people are dying from fine particulate matter.
	You know, stuff that you find in smokestacks, fireplaces, barbecues, and diesel engines.
	That's killing more people than heart disease and cancer.
	And she knew that was a lie.
	And they brought these people in and they didn't tell them what they were doing to them.
	And they didn't tell the people who came in for this experiment either what the purpose of the experiment was.
	And so Igor says, we can ask a question.
	Can the invisible link between the faithful and God be severed by a third party, armed with the tools provided by the latest scientific advances?
	No. No.
	What can separate us from the love of Christ?
	Can life or death?
	No. Can demons or angels?
	No. Can the present or the future?
	No. Can the powers of hell or Washington, D.C.? I know I'm being redundant here.
	But can they separate us from the love of Christ?
	No. They can damage you mentally.
	They can blind you physically.
	They can blind you mentally or spiritually, but they cannot separate you from the love of Christ.
	And so there's not anything And all of creation that can separate you if you have that relationship.
	So get that relationship now.
	They cannot take that away from you.
	That's why I say we don't want to put our hope...
	In government. It is wicked.
	It is evil. As one of the prophets said about to a Jewish king, he said, you put your trust in Egypt, you're going to find that it's a cane that you lean on that's going to pierce your hand.
	That is government. That is political parties.
	That's politicians. These people can kill us They can kill our bodies, they can destroy our minds, but they cannot separate us from the love of God in Christ.
	They cannot do that. So this is a study where they lied to the subjects, just like the EPA I mentioned before.
	Or, you know, to the people that they were given the COVID shots to.
	They lied to them. They lied to all of us about the COVID shots, didn't they?
	That was one big lab rat test, wasn't it?
	Government is constantly lying to people.
	Because they work for the father of lies.
	The study was extremely unethical when recruiting study subjects.
	The doctor running it, Holbrook, lied about the purposes of the study.
	He wanted to use electromagnetic waves to reduce belief in God.
	He offered participants $25 while promising ostensibly unrelated activities.
	He said undergraduates were recruited for a study ostensibly consisting of a series of unrelated measures in exchange for $25.
	$25. And he'll do a kind of electromagnetic lobotomy on you.
	He says, now as we know, to religious people abandoning belief in God as blasphemy puts them at risk of going to hell, shunning and so on.
	No, that's not the case for Christians.
	Whatever these people do to you, that no more would affect your salvation than if they were to kill you.
	They can destroy the body, they can destroy the mind, but they cannot destroy that security that you have in the hand of God who has given you, as Jesus said, all the Father gives me.
	I will not lose one.
	And that includes the U.S. Air Force doing this study.
	They were the ones who were behind this and continuing it.
	Isn't that amazing? It just never ceases to amaze me how evil...
	And wasteful our government is.
	This is like the CIA running its occultic experiments that they've done for years.
	Drugs and occultic things and remote viewing and things like that.
	This is the Air Force.
	How can we use electromagnetic waves to try to damage people so they have no religious beliefs?
	And it brings up the question, so what is this 5G stuff, right?
	Or something to follow on after it.
	For years after that, Holbrook continued to work on religious neuromodulation and electromagnetic waves to reduce undesirables, in his opinion, people who had religious faith and what he said was prejudice.
	Prejudice. And so, again, you know, who sponsors this work?
	Well, it's continued and ongoing from the Air Force, and they sponsor this thing in the first place.
	I tell you what, it's, you know, we've had, the people in the Air Force have really been blessed to have total air superiority for 60, 70 years, right?
	They don't understand where that blessing comes from, and they really don't care.
	Do you think Americans, they asked Americans in a poll, do they think that a president's power should be checked?
	They all say yes, unless it's their guy.
	And see, that's the problem, and that's why I speak so much against Trump, because Democrats all my life have taken the position that we need to have a stronger central government, that they need to issue orders for our own good, because we don't know what our own good is.
	But this is something that is relatively new to conservatives.
	Conservatives have always been, no, we need smaller government.
	Conservatives always repeated what Ronald Reagan said, government's not the solution, it's the problem.
	But not now.
	Not now. Because so much power has been concentrated in Washington and specifically in the presidency that everybody is fighting over that ring of power.
	And that's what has to stop.
	As a matter of fact, Jason Barker sent this.
	This is a book title that he put together as a satire.
	He says, I just got this book.
	And he said, it was totally amazing.
	It seems kind of thick, but it's really as a short read.
	First couple of chapters are dry.
	Things like the constitution of the bill of rights, boring.
	Then there's a pledge of allegiance and some lyrics to Kenny Chesney song.
	That wasn't so bad to get through.
	And after that, it's an amazing tale written in vibrant colors of crayon, complete with stick figure illustrations of how great things are.
	I particularly like the chapter and verse where the helicopters drop down free cash and we all become rich.
	The picture I like is on the back.
	He said, solar powered grill looks like they were made out of bugs.
	And I'm sure that was just the artist's creativity.
	So, there we go.
	It's $666.
	After rebate, on sale now, Trump's Art of the Steel.
	Well, we're going to talk a little bit more about Trump's Art of the Steel when we come back.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	Music playing.
	you Well, welcome back on Rumble, Stealth Patriot.
	Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that.
	He says, um... I trust God with my eternal salvation.
	But when they're importing the world and cutting all the resources, we're being put into a kill box.
	If it weren't for my faith, I'd be terrified.
	Well, that's absolutely right.
	We need to understand what that is, and we need to do what we can to prepare to warn other people.
	Perhaps we get enough of a groundswell that we can do something about it.
	We need to understand that liberty is a blessing from God.
	So fundamentally, we have to, one by one, fix our relationship with God.
	I know that that sounds impossible, but it is not.
	That's what we need to be looking to and praying for, I think.
	So with that in mind, let's take a look at the war situation.
	Because that is also very depressing, along with the rest of these things.
	And also, I'll say this.
	I wasn't planning on talking about this, but I'll just say real briefly.
	A lot of times we go through things, we don't really understand what it is.
	I've had a few little things.
	I know a lot of you have gone through a lot worse than I have, but we had a very difficult time at one point in time.
	We got rid of our business and it was just an unbelievable scam, the people that bought it.
	We fought them in court, lost even more money trying to get it back.
	And it was devastating financially.
	I stopped at the time and I thought, you know, I thought I was doing the right thing.
	I thought I was getting out of this, and I was getting out of this because I didn't want to be in that business as a Christian.
	I just couldn't understand why these bad things were happening to me.
	And as I said, a lot of people had a lot worse than that happened.
	Loss of a loved one, sickness, yourself, other things like that.
	But it was a difficult thing for us.
	God gives us things that we can handle.
	He doesn't give us more than we can handle at any given time.
	And one of the things that I realized after we got through it after a number of years, what I realized was that that hardship was really a blessing from God because it gave me a stronger relationship with Him.
	And it showed me that I could trust Him through difficult times.
	That's the key lesson.
	And there's not any dollar figure that you could put on something like that.
	And so a lot of times we go through difficult things.
	It strengthens as we see God provide just in time for certain things.
	And so many different things that happen I'm not going to go into.
	But, you know, when God provides just in time, does it over and over again.
	It was such a blessing for me and for the family to see that.
	The family saw that as well.
	And you can't...
	There's nothing that is more valuable than that.
	Going through difficult times and seeing God's provision.
	And that was really a blessing.
	Those hardships were a blessing.
	I didn't realize at the time.
	I thought, what is going on with this?
	You know, is this punishment because I took so long to get out of it?
	You know, what... What is going on with this?
	And that was actually kindness to me.
	And so, you know, that is the way that it is.
	God our Father gives us discipline, you know, for good parents who discipline our kids, and because it makes them better.
	The people who don't get the discipline are the ones that Should be afraid.
	People like Bezos or Gates or whoever, they just go through their merry way collecting all this money and never getting corrected for any of that.
	That's a very dangerous thing.
	Let's talk about the developments in the Middle East first, and we'll talk about Ukraine as well.
	The IDF ended their active ground invasion over the weekend, completely withdrawing from southern Gaza.
	For now. I wouldn't be surprised to see this happening again.
	This is happening, most likely, because of Biden pushing them.
	He was in a very difficult position with his base.
	Most of his base hated this and sided with people in Gaza, especially after the prolonged bombing of civilians.
	And even Trump said, well, I'm not going to...
	This is a very bad look for Israel.
	They need to stop this. Everybody, the vast majority of Americans...
	Both presidential candidates and everything, we're all saying the same thing.
	So it's necessary, one way or the other, for Israel to pull back.
	Breitbart couches it as a betrayal by Biden, a victory for Hamas.
	But either way, certainly I think there was U.S. pressure.
	And the question is, what does Israel get out of it?
	My concern is that, you know, Israel has said that they want to get rid of the people there and send them to Europe, send them to the U.S. Is that part of the deal?
	Is that what's going to happen?
	Look out for betrayal from Biden and watch for this to start again.
	And it may, even if they pull their defense forces out, after the attacks happen, Essentially direct attacks on Iran by bombing their embassy in Syria last week.
	What that is inviting is a direct attack from Iran, which Israel and especially the United States have been salivating for for the longest time.
	Once it is no longer a proxy war, you know, Iran has been using proxies like Hezbollah and others to attack Israel, America, and other things like that.
	But once it is a direct attack from By Iran?
	Oh, well, then everything changes at that point in time.
	And that's the concern right now.
	When you look at both Iran and Ukraine, We've had proxy wars.
	And this is something that's been going on with the Cold War and all the rest of the stuff.
	Vietnam, we had proxy fights, all these different places.
	But it's now getting to the point where Europe and even the U.S. and the Ukrainian thing, as well as Israel and then the U.S. and the Middle East, are moving from a situation where we've had proxy warfare to direct confrontation.
	And that direct confrontation is a massive escalation towards World War III, even perhaps nuclear war with the Russians.
	The Israeli Defense Forces announced Sunday that they'd withdrawn their forces from southern Gaza following a demand from Biden last week for an immediate ceasefire, quote-unquote.
	Hamas declared victory, reports Breitbart on that.
	And at the same time, we have Muslim protesters in America Chanting death to America, death to Israel.
	This is in Michigan, in Dearborn.
	We have a lot of refugee populations that are Islamic that they brought in to Michigan, also into Minneapolis.
	People I've talked to call it Little Mogadishu who've lived in that area.
	And this is the thing that concerns me.
	As I said before, will Biden accept these people from Gaza?
	As the incentive to Netanyahu to stop this?
	Are we now going to be flooded with more people who are chanting death to America, death to Israel?
	Is that going to be the end result of this?
	I don't know, but I kind of have a feeling that that is in the works somewhere, somehow, in all this.
	And then we have Mike Johnson.
	This guy who just came out of nowhere.
	A Louisiana congressman nobody had ever heard of.
	And all of a sudden, you know, they're trying to, you know, they're taking the number two, the number three guys.
	They can't get elected as speaker after they push out McCarthy.
	And all of a sudden, this guy appears and everybody votes for him.
	Well, we're just tired of all this.
	And he gets in. And immediately, he does a complete 180 on Ukraine and starts pushing it.
	He was always, no, we don't need to be giving away this money to Ukraine.
	We need to fix our border. And immediately, he goes there.
	And then as a Christian, he is giving unconditional support to Israel, as so many Christians do.
	Mike Johnson has pledged to bring up Ukraine aid for a vote in the House soon after Congress returns from their Easter recess in coming days.
	But nobody knows what the bill is going to look like.
	Nobody knows what's going to be in it.
	Nobody knows who's going to support it.
	It remains unsettled.
	And so, again, what we do know is that this guy has completely changed.
	The Senate has already passed a $95 billion package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.
	And they did it with bipartisan support.
	Because Washington is our enemy.
	They are making us less and less secure.
	They're not doing anything for national security or for peace or safety of Americans.
	Everything they do is to put us at risk.
	And it put us at risk of World War III. Things have gotten so bad in Ukraine, as a matter of fact, that they had a 14-year-old Ukrainian was abducted by a group of Ukrainian soldiers, essentially a press gang.
	You know, we've seen this type of thing historically.
	The British would do that. They would, you know, waylay somebody in a bar or something, knock them out.
	The next thing they wake up on a British warship and they're And they're stuck with that.
	Well, this is a group of Ukrainian soldiers detained at gunpoint and assaulted a 14-year-old orphan as part of Kiev's push to mobilize more people for the conflict lines.
	As he escaped, actually, once they found out that he was 14, he's an athlete, and so they thought he was older than he was.
	Just last week I was talking about the fact that they had lowered their age of conscription from 27 to 25.
	That's not enough for Lindsey Graham.
	What? You better get more people out there on the front line.
	And it's like, that guy, he just can't kill enough people.
	And he doesn't care what nationality they are.
	Just kill, kill, kill.
	Anyway, they said he began to resist these people.
	He, again, was a bigger guy, plays sports.
	They restrained him and hit him in the back with an assault rifle, beat him, tied his hands with plastic ties.
	They said they drove him in complete silence for a while.
	Only much later they asked his age. When he said how old he was, they didn't believe him.
	And they asked for his passport.
	When they realized they were transporting a minor, they threw him out of the van.
	And he made his way to a village.
	He walked 13, they transported him 13 kilometers from where he was.
	He went to another village, walked for two hours to get home.
	In a state of shock, he told his teachers at school what had happened, and they then contacted the authorities.
	And the story went viral in Ukraine as a case of kidnapping.
	But look, That is exactly what the draft is, isn't it?
	It's not that it usually evolved the violence up front.
	But it's to put you, you know, to enslave you to their war.
	And it is the intention and has been identified as such by neutral third-party observers like military in India.
	I remember at the very beginning of this, they said, well, the intention of NATO and the U.S. is to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.
	And so we'll get to the point where they will kidnap 14-year-olds.
	But before that, it may turn into something worse.
	World War III is now inevitable, says Brandon Smith.
	Here's why it cannot be avoided.
	He said, in the past few months, there's been multiple instances of European and U.S. officials hinting at the possibility of a new military draft.
	The EU talking openly about boots on the ground in Ukraine.
	NATO officials have stated unequivocally that they will not accept a loss in Ukraine to Russians.
	And then we have, last week, So several people, highest level, talking about how they're going to admit Ukraine into NATO, which is essentially a declaration of war, because as soon as Ukraine is in NATO and Russia attacks Ukraine, which is happening all the time now, Then they have attacked all of the NATO countries.
	That's the way the treaty reads.
	And we had Secretary of State Blinken say that.
	We had the head of NATO say that last week.
	So you got the head of NATO and you got the Secretary of State of the U.S. saying that.
	They're going to admit Ukraine into NATO. Then there's Israel and Gaza.
	He said, I warned months ago in my article that it's a trap.
	He said the war in Gaza will expand into a multi-front conflict that will probably include Iran, but of course that is what Israel and the U.S. want.
	They want to get rid of these proxy attacks.
	They want direct attacks.
	Just like they want direct conflict with Europe and the US and Russia.
	They're going to use these proxies as long as they can, but then they eventually want to get to a direct attack.
	There's also a large contingent, he says, of capable and mostly conservative men with the background and the aptitude for combat.
	That still want nothing to do with Ukraine.
	He said the reason for it is simple.
	They believe that a far left Western governments and globalists want to use them as cannon fodder to get rid of them.
	And once they are used up in war, there'll be no one left to oppose the leftist takeover at home.
	For most of us in America, whether we're left or right, we have no interest in fighting these people in Ukraine.
	That's not going to matter in terms of preventing a global war.
	War with Russia will depend more on European involvement than U.S. involvement.
	While the U.S. has been the largest provider of armaments to Ukraine so far, the ultimate goal, he says, I believe, is to integrate European troops into the Ukrainian front, which would be an automatic declaration of global war.
	The basis for mobilization of troops from Europe is the domino theory propaganda.
	Same stuff that we were told with Vietnam.
	And then after the war, When Errol Morris did his film, The Fog of Warren, he interviewed Robert McNamara at the end of his life.
	He died shortly after that.
	And he got, you know, that was his gift as a filmmaker.
	He could get people talking and confessing to all kinds of stuff.
	He got a guy who confessed to killing cops and, you know, got one guy off of the death row and another one on.
	But the guy actually confessed to him, even though he's recording.
	He used to be an interrogator and detective and he took those skills with him and started making films.
	But he got Robert Magnum here to talk about that and Magnum understood that it was a war crime.
	He tried to divert it by saying, well, you know, if we'd lost World War II, what happened in Dresden, the firebombing in Germany?
	He said we would have been tried as war criminals.
	Americans would have for that if we'd lost the war.
	So he was trying to minimize what he had done and equivocate it to that, you know, what But he said many years afterwards, he went with American delegation and they met with the people they'd been fighting in Vietnam.
	And he said, one of the guys stood up and banged on the table and said, what's the matter with you Americans?
	Don't you understand anything about history?
	Don't you, this domino theory thing?
	It's nonsense. We've been fighting the Chinese for a thousand years and they still have border disputes with the Chinese now.
	Now that they have started manufacturing things in Vietnam and all the rest of this stuff.
	But he says, you don't know anything about history.
	You don't understand what was happening there.
	And McNamara confessed that.
	You know, he's supposed to be the smartest guy with his kid and all the rest of this stuff.
	No, they get blinded just like everybody else.
	According to the evidence, it's clear that NATO troops have already been deployed to Ukraine and been there for some time.
	That was what we heard last week.
	We had... Blink in the Secretary of State and the guy who's head of NATO, both of them saying, we're going to bring Ukraine into NATO. And then you had the Minister of Defense for Estonia and you had Tusk out of Poland, both of them saying, yeah, we got troops in Ukraine already.
	And all the European countries have people there as advisors.
	So they've been there.
	And, of course, as Brandon Smith says, the Russians know this, of course.
	But it's a different thing to have some mercenaries come in under the guise of being advisors and then sending in openly deploying NATO battalions, which is what these guys, these idiots are doing now.
	He says there's really nothing for Russia to gain by threatening Europe.
	We saw this happening in Syria as well.
	Remember, it was an annual thing with three years in a row The first three years of the Trump administration, in the springtime, they would try to get boots on the ground in Syria.
	And so they wanted us to believe that even though we were in Syria, involved in Syria, stealing the oil, as Trump was so proud of doing, Even though we got involved in that power play there, and we're, you know,
	behind the scenes using other proxies and stuff, we were supposed to believe that as the Syrian government was encircling these insurgents and on the verge of victory in a city, that somehow he decided that he would use the one thing that would be the excuse to bring America into a direct position.
	Conflict. No longer using proxy, but putting American troops on the ground.
	And that would be a gas attack against a civilian population.
	And they pulled that trick three years in a row.
	And it was a lie every time.
	And so, you know, this is the type of thing that they do.
	It doesn't matter that, you know, that would be the dumbest thing in the world.
	He has absolutely no motivation to do that, to do just the opposite.
	And that's what's true of Russia.
	To go beyond that to threaten the rest of Europe, that makes absolutely no sense at all.
	We understand how the coup in Ukraine, the constant civil war for eight years before this all began, that was a constant provocation.
	But there's not anything like that that is happening anywhere else in Europe.
	And then there's Iran and the Middle East.
	Oil will be the primary driver for international involvement, but oil is not what it's about, he says.
	That is not the end goal.
	That is just the mechanism to get the U.S. involved, the excuse to get us involved.
	It is necessary for them, as Gerald Slenty has said, when everything else fails, they take you to war.
	If all of their MacGuffins are not working and people are starting to push back against this, or if it's just going too slowly and they need to speed it up, Almost every one of these fourth turnings, almost every one, is accompanied by wars.
	Always economic unrest.
	Always. Because that's the fundamental thing that's being restructured.
	You're moving from an agrarian society to an industrial society.
	So you have a civil war here.
	You have a civil war in Italy and many other places as they create a nation state and as they change from agrarian to an industrialized society.
	And so that same type of thing is happening now.
	It's always accompanied by economic unrest because you're making that kind of change.
	But usually it involves war as well because it's such a seismic shift in what is happening.
	The U.S. and U.K. have bombed Yemen 148 times since January.
	The U.S. and the U.K. bombing Yemen.
	Why? What is our interest in Yemen?
	Why have we bombed them 148 times?
	Well, because we want war.
	We want war all the time, everywhere, as many places as we can get it.
	According to the Yemen Data Project, a total of 339 munitions were dropped on Yemen in the first 80 days of the bombing campaign.
	At least 148 missile strikes have hit Yemen since the U.S. and the U.K. launched a new bombing campaign against the Houthis in January.
	They said the first 80 days of the U.S.-led bombing campaign, starting in January 12th, a total of 339 munitions hit Yemen, averaging more than four per day.
	The U.K. has joined the U.S. in several rounds of missile strikes, but most have been unilateral U.S. attacks on Houthi-controlled Yemen.
	We want constant war because that's how these people pay off the military industrial contractors.
	That's how they practice their shooting.
	They like to have live fire drills.
	And they don't care what happens to people.
	Ukraine is striking at Russian oil deeper and deeper into Russia.
	It just continues to escalate.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the jazz channel at APS radio.com and the APS radio app and leave the stress behind behind.
	I'm going to play a little bit of the song.
	so
	liberty it's your move And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about politics.
	We have the FBI arresting a couple, three years later, after being inside the Capitol in January 6 for 12 minutes.
	We also have a grandma.
	That has just been convicted.
	Mayface, a year in prison, $200,000 fine.
	You know, this Civil War movie that is coming out, and there's probably an alternative for this, motive for this, that Hollywood has.
	As they've got some of the filmmakers and actors doing the rounds and promotion.
	And it comes out now that, you know, the president...
	In the Civil War, the guy who plays the president, was it Nick Offerman?
	Was that the guy's name that was in Parks and Recreation?
	I never saw Parks and Recreation.
	I had, for about a year, I was working in Austin before the family moved out.
	And the family found it and they thought it was really funny because he played this libertarian in a...
	In a city bureaucracy, probably know more about it than I do, but they would tell me the quotes from his character, and I always enjoyed them.
	But in this, he plays the president, and it comes out that he has shut down the FBI. It's like, well, I know who I'm supporting in this civil war.
	If he's got the foresight and the intestinal fortitude to shut down the FBI, he's my man right there.
	Especially since he's got a libertarian background.
	Of course, in real life, the actor couldn't be any less libertarian than any of the least libertarian people out there.
	But when you look at what is happening to many people, and I covered this one last week, but...
	RFK Jr. this week, besides coming out and saying that he's, as Gard mentioned, saying that, yeah, he's going to support abortion, make it federal law, going to federalize it again.
	Isn't that interesting? You know, all three candidates, Trump, Biden, RFK Jr., have all promised that they're going to refederalize abortion.
	Why should it be that way? It's just what I was saying about the presidency itself.
	Why put all power in the presidency?
	Well, because they want everybody fighting over, because they want a civil war.
	Why bring this back?
	And everything has to be done in Washington.
	We're not going to allow 50 different approaches to anything and see what works.
	No, we will have one solution, and it'll be dictated from Washington.
	And as long as we're going to continue to go down that road, we're going to wind up having more medical martial law and other things like that that we saw in 2020.
	It's their way or the highway.
	And so all three of them want to federalize it again.
	Scalia got it right when he wrote the decision, Dobbs' decision, says this is not anything that belongs to the federal government.
	And I hope if they write some law like that, that somebody challenges it and takes it back, and then to be consistent, I hope the Supreme Court would be consistent with the Dobbs' decision and throw it out.
	I don't think they'll have the courage to do that.
	I was really surprised that they did it the first time.
	Anyway, RFK Jr.
	is sent out an apology because he did a fundraiser where he's talking about the political prisoners Julian Assange, Ed Snowden, and January 6th protesters.
	And because he's increasingly moving to, you know, supporters are increasingly radical leftists, they got very upset about it, and so he did a retraction saying, well, I don't mean that January 6th people.
	Oh, really? He said, first he said that all three of them were, that Assange was a political prisoner, that he and the January 6th rioters were victims of, quote, an outrageous miscarriage of justice.
	Well, I don't know how in the world it is just to have someone given decades for a non-violent political protest that is protected under the Constitution.
	Look, I understand that That these people were lied into this thing fraudulently.
	They were prodded to go by Trump, by his surrogates like Alex Jones and Steve Bannon and many others who were doing it to enrich themselves just like Trump was doing it to make money off of these poor people and to throw them in as cannon fodder.
	And I knew what was going to happen and I warned everybody about this, but these people are still victims in the same way that a woman who has an abortion is a victim.
	They had some Yahoo in Texas came up with murder charges on a woman who had an abortion.
	And that is stupid.
	The doctors certainly know what's going on, and they've profited from this, and they should be charged with murder.
	But not the woman who's been deceived.
	And that's the way it is with these January the Sixers.
	I feel sorry for them. I did what I could to warn them, and my conscience is clear on that.
	It's a matter of record, what I said.
	And I opposed it from two days after the election.
	I opposed the lies that were being sold by Alex and Steve Pachinik on InfoWars and the rest of them on InfoWars.
	I opposed his Stop the Steal.
	I opposed Trump's stuff.
	I said, Trump is the one who put in the vote-by-mail thing, and they're still leaving it in.
	And so that morning, January the 6th, that was a Wednesday.
	Tuesday, they'd had the runoff election.
	The Democrats won both Senate seats for the Democrats in Georgia because they'd run by the same rules.
	And I said, why didn't they fix that?
	In Georgia, at least, where you've got a Republican state legislature and a governor.
	Why don't you stop that vote-by-mail fraud?
	But they didn't.
	And I told everybody, I said, again, the very last thing in the program, I said, don't go to January 6th.
	It's a trap. There's going to be agent provocateurs there.
	You're going to be at risk.
	They're going to use this to come after the conservative movement to paint it as a rebellion.
	Don't follow these people.
	They're just trying to rip you off.
	But this is the quote that RFK Jr.
	put in there. He said, the Brits want to make sure that our government doesn't kill Assange.
	This is the reality that every American citizen faces, from Ed Snowden to Julian Assange to the J-6 activists sitting in the Washington, D.C. jail cell, stripped of their constitutional liberties.
	Then they retracted it.
	They said that was put in there by one of our new marketing contractors.
	So he doesn't support them.
	He doesn't think that they have been stripped of their constitutional liberties.
	They have. They have.
	In an interview last month, Kennedy said he won't speak about potentially pardoning rioters until he wins the general election.
	If somebody walks in, they've got this grandmother who's now facing things.
	She went in and prayed.
	You have people like Sam who walked in taking pictures.
	They've come after so many people who just walked in.
	They are not rioters.
	They're not rioters. They're activists.
	They were misguided in what they thought was going to be possible and what was going to happen, but it was constitutionally protected speech.
	If anybody got violent, they deserve jail, but they don't deserve decades of jail.
	So Kennedy said he won't speak about potentially pardoning the rioters until he wins the general election.
	He said he would approach it on a case-by-case basis.
	But he said he would pardon Snowden and Assange.
	So, again, you know, who cares about policies?
	We've got these marketing people out there, right?
	Meanwhile, with all the stuff that's happening in Congress with Speaker Johnson, Marjorie Taylor Greene goes on with Tucker Carlson, and he floats the question, is Johnson being blackmailed?
	And then she repeats that later on.
	And so that becomes her quote that is attributed to her everywhere.
	She said he's made a complete departure of who he is and what he stands for and to the point where people are literally asking, is he being blackmailed?
	What is wrong with him?
	Because he's completely disconnected from what we want.
	And again, she said that after Tucker Carlson said, is he being blackmailed?
	She said, I have no idea.
	I can't comprehend Tucker.
	But then she comes back and repeats that.
	He gets her in trouble.
	But again, I don't know that it's blackmail or if it's bribery.
	You understand it could go both ways.
	And they don't have to explicitly give him any money or anything.
	They could have bribed him with a speakership in a very subtle way.
	People don't have to come in and be as crude as to say, well, here's a quid pro quo.
	I'm going to put you in as speaker, but you're going to do this and this.
	They put him in as speaker, and he's going to be able to read the room.
	He's going to know what they want.
	They want money for their Ukrainian war and all the rest of this stuff.
	And he is more than willing to sacrifice his principles, if he had any, and he appeared to have had some.
	He's more than willing to sacrifice those and do a 180 on all this stuff in order to keep that power.
	That is a sense of bribery.
	You know that you're going to lose that position.
	You will toe the line with it.
	And Travis is telling me I need to remind everybody to like the stream.
	Please like the stream. That really does help us much needed with visibility.
	And... And again, we haven't gotten to the money stuff yet, but when you look at what is happening to gold, gold is up $300 in the last couple of months.
	It was hovering around for quite a while around the $1,900 to $2,000 level.
	It's got up to $2,300.
	I don't think that's the end of it.
	And of course, it's going to fluctuate back and forth as everything else does, but it's been pretty steady, steady rise.
	It's not real volatile.
	But again, if you want to hedge this digital ID, this CBDC stuff, the inflation, the economic unrest that's on the way, a great way to hedge that is with gold.
	That's what the wealthy people are doing.
	That's what the central banks are doing.
	You might ought to think about that as well.
	And you can go to davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Ardman.
	And he can help you with gold or silver.
	He can lock in the price. He can handle small or large transactions.
	He can even help you to accumulate it on a monthly basis as part of a buying group he calls Wolfpack.
	To get the better price.
	So again, davidknight.gold will take you to Tony Arban.
	I've known Tony for a long time, and now this is what everybody's been talking about.
	It's gold going up, as Gerald was saying on Friday.
	He said, at the beginning of the year, this is going to be a golden year for gold because of the unrest and the inflation, chickens that are coming home to roost, as well as the war issues and all the rest of it.
	But getting back to Marjorie Tillegreen, she says, what happened?
	She said, you can't help but question...
	What do they have on him? Well again, I think it's the bribery of power.
	How easy, by the way, is it going to be to bribe Trump Over truth social?
	That's a question that Time Magazine was asking.
	They said, you know, if Trump gets elected again, it'll only be the second time since Grover Cleveland did it.
	Somebody who loses an election, waits out for four years, then goes back a second time.
	Grover Cleveland did that, but it'll be the first president since him to move back to the White House after four years of being out.
	But, unlike Grover Cleveland, he is also going to come back in We're good to go.
	Again, as I mentioned earlier in the program, all the revenue is not as bad as Canoe that I talked about, but when we look at Trump Social, they had about $4 million, about what you would have from one typical McDonald's location.
	That was their gross revenue, but they lost $58 million off of that.
	And then it had a $9 billion stock evaluation.
	Now, of course, it dropped a little bit after people realized that they'd only took in $4 million and lost $58 million.
	But Times says, imagine the whole world spending four years tracking the ups and downs of Trump's media stock in real time as they speculate as to whether or not any movement connects to the Trump administration's policy decisions.
	And you know they're going to be bringing that up whether there's a connection or not.
	The media will connect it to that.
	So concerns, they said, about his political positions being for sale are not exactly new.
	Trump reversed his position on a TikTok ban after meeting with mega-donor Jeffrey Yass.
	Even Steve Bannon said it's YassCoin that changed his mind.
	Because Bannon wants to ban TikTok.
	Trump wanted to ban it.
	I don't think it's a wise decision, but what changed his mind?
	I haven't changed my position on it.
	15% stake in TikTok is what Jeffrey Yass has.
	And he also has a 2% foothold in Trump's Truth Social.
	And so the question is, what is going to happen around that?
	I think it's also interesting that as Trump doubled his fortune on paper, at least, it's a paper increase, who knows what the price of the stock will be when he sells it.
	And he's got so much in it that when he makes these, when he sells stock, it's going to have an immediate impact on the overall value of it.
	But he's also fighting for every last bit of it.
	The guys who came to him and put it together were a couple of people who had been apprentice contestants.
	And in exchange to put this thing together, he gave them an 8.6% stake in it.
	Pretty much kept the rest of it.
	But it's not enough for him to have 91.4%.
	He's got to have 100%.
	And so there's a back-and-forth law.
	He's tried to squeeze them out.
	They sued him. He's countersued them.
	He's got four lawsuits going over this, trying to get that last 8.5% there.
	Dueling lawsuits only highlight just how much chaos the former president's ill-advised stock market bid has already caused.
	Yeah, as everybody talks about poor Trump and all of his lawfare, what they don't point out is the fact that he's initiated a lot of this stuff himself.
	And yet, even as his company was losing money, $58 million, the people inside the company were making millions.
	That's how it brings in $4 million and loses $58 million?
	What was that? Was that for electricity and computers and stuff?
	No, it was handing out millions of dollars to these various people.
	People like Devin Nunes, who was...
	The CEO and President, he got $4.6 million in addition to a $750,000 salary.
	That increased to $1 million this year.
	See, that's what I was talking about. When you talk about a mom-and-pop main street store that has to make money by competing with people versus a Wall Street corporation where you can have gross revenues of $4 million and yet pay your CEO $4.6 million in addition to his $750,000 salary and a bonus of $1 million as well.
	And he's not the only one.
	That's how it got up to $58 million.
	Cash Patel. A former aide to Nunes, paid $130,000, and he's up for bonuses as well.
	And on and on.
	Dan Scavino, all these different people getting millions each.
	Other executives received a total of $1.24 million in bonuses.
	So a chief operating officer who used to work for Parler, now he's made over a million dollars of this.
	And then there are four different lawsuits happening because it's just not enough money.
	He's got to have that last 8.6%.
	He's going to squeeze these guys out who started this whole thing going.
	But getting back to these people at January the 6th, again, this grandma was speaking out.
	This was sent to me.
	This is off of Infowars.
	A jury convicted a 71-year-old woman.
	Facing a year in prison, more than $200,000 in fines for going into the Congress building and praying for 10 minutes.
	And when I saw this, I thought, what nerve Alex Jones and Infowars have putting this up.
	Yes, she is a victim.
	A victim of him!
	And then they've got an interview with her talking to Steve Bannon, who egged her on.
	And now he's there holding her hand and crying crocodile tears about what has happened to her.
	We're talking about this with my sons, and one of them said that this is like some guy with a camera who wants to get a viral video, and he tells this person, go over there and poke that bear with a stick while I film it, you know?
	And they do. They get mauled.
	And you react to the person who did this, who sent them over to poke the bear with a stick.
	And they say, well, you're pro-bear.
	I'm not pro-Biden.
	I think what Biden is doing is reprehensible.
	I think it's excessive.
	And as a matter of fact, in this article, nowhere in this article does it talk about jury nullification.
	It does mention, she said, 12 members of a jury.
	They deliberated for 26 hours.
	She said, well, it was good because it was obvious that at least one person on the jury was fighting for me.
	That's all she needed. She should have used jury nullification.
	I know that this whole thing is rigged.
	These trials are kangaroo court.
	They're having them in D.C. because the people on the jury.
	But here she is. She's got one person who's looking at this.
	Now, what was their concern about this, say, with jury nullification?
	Was there a question as to whether or not she was overcharged?
	Perhaps. But it might have also been, because this is another part of jury nullification, That if somebody's penalty is incredibly out of line for the crime, even if somebody has committed the crime, if they believe that the law is wrong or the penalty is out of line, then the jury has the right and the duty to nullify that law.
	That should have been argued. As a matter of fact, you know, if I was in a situation like that, I would, you know, I've said many times, it usually is true.
	The person who defends themselves has a fool for a lawyer, unless you're going for jury nullification.
	And then you can't get a lawyer to argue that.
	And I think that's what some of these people should have done.
	But there's never any discussion of that.
	And of course, it is outrageous and unjustified what the Biden administration and the FBI are doing to people.
	But she said, and the amazing thing about all this, was she said that, told Steve Bannon, the reason she went there was because God led her to go there.
	And I'm sorry, but God did not lead her to go there.
	Alex Jones did.
	Trump did.
	Bannon did.
	When you hear voices or you get a feeling or an urging or a leading or something to do something, you still have a responsibility to check that and to have some discernment.
	Is this God speaking or is it something else?
	Is it me? Is it something else that's speaking to me?
	You need to have some discernment about that.
	And you also need to have a discernment that includes common sense.
	If you're getting a leading and an urging or hearing voices telling you to jump off of a roof, Well, maybe your common sense should tell you that's not a good thing for you.
	And your discernment should tell you, therefore, it is not coming from God.
	It might be coming from Trump or from Alex Jones or from Steve Bannon, because we know exactly what Bannon was up to.
	Here's the audio clip, as a matter of fact.
	And what Trump's going to do is declare victory, right?
	He's going to declare victory. But that doesn't mean he's the winner.
	He's just going to say he's the winner.
	The Democrats, more of our people vote early than count.
	Theirs voted male. And so they're going to have a natural disadvantage, and Trump's going to take advantage of it.
	That's our strategy. He's just going to clear himself a winner.
	So when you wake up Wednesday morning, it's going to be a firestorm.
	We're gonna have a T for crazy, the media crazy, the courts are crazy, and Trump's gonna be sitting there mocking, tweeting shit out, you lose.
	I'm the winner. I'm the king.
	And he'll be all over, he'll be going, where's Hunter?
	Is Hunter on a crack pipe? I mean, no.
	Because then it doesn't matter.
	Remember, here's the thing.
	After that, Trump never has to go to a voter again.
	He's going to fire raid the FBI direction.
	He's going to say, fuck you.
	He's done his last election.
	Oh, he's going to be off the chase.
	He's going to be crazy. Also, if Trump is losing...
	By 10 or 11 o'clock at night, it's going to be even crazier.
	No, because he's going to sit right there and say they stole it.
	I'm directing the Attorney General to shut down all ballot places in all 50 states.
	It's going to be no. He's not going out easy.
	If Biden's winning, Trump is going to do some crazy shit.
	Yeah, it's not going to go down easy.
	This is the plan. We create this vote-by-mail thing.
	It's going to create chaos and fraud.
	We're going to say that we won.
	And we're going to come after them completely.
	And then he goes, then Bannon goes to, that was then, that was two weeks before the election.
	Then most recently he went to CPAC. And he said this about Trump is going to take the trash out.
	And destiny is to have the greatest political comeback in American history.
	And on November 5th, to drive the vermin out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
	And let's put some new trash in.
	You and your crime family are nothing but trash, okay?
	And on the 20th of January of 2025, we're going to take out the trash.
	And we're going to have all new trash.
	Well, we'll bring back the Trump trash in there.
	Look, he says he's going to be off the chain.
	He's not going to have to go to the voters because there's no more election.
	Same thing is true of Biden.
	Think about that. This next election, whoever is president, whether it's Trump or Biden, is going to take us through the end of the fourth turning, up to 2029.
	They're both going to be off the chain.
	They're both going to be, I don't care what anybody says in the vernacular of Bannon, F you.
	I'm going to do whatever I want to.
	We've seen both of them do that.
	Both of them don't even have to pretend to care what you think anymore.
	And then we have, after all of that, this grandma who has followed these people Rebecca, what did God tell you when you prayed to God in Colorado Springs after your son called you?
	And you prayed before you went?
	What did God tell you?
	I felt, he just told me you need to go and stand up for your country, you know, and stand for truth.
	I've just been always a lover of truth, so I just couldn't sit back.
	And that's basically what he said.
	And then as I got there, I realized the main reason I was there to stand up for my covenant.
	I'm a very strong believer in covenants, and covenants with God are a higher...
	Higher authority than what the government is maybe saying, and so I know that my battle is not against flesh and blood, but it's against spiritual principalities and powers, and they always win.
	One of my lifelong verses is John 10, 10 in the Bible, and it says, The thief comes to kill, strill, and destroy, but Jesus came to give life, and life abundantly.
	And that particular case in this application that she's talking about, the thief would be people like Bannon that she's talking to, Trump, Alex, other people like that.
	They come to steal and destroy your life.
	You've got to have the discernment to understand, to distinguish a voice that is telling you to do things that are going to harm you versus a voice that is telling you to do the right thing in spite of the consequences.
	It's a difficult thing.
	Look, I don't feel good about criticizing her, but I'm just saying we've got to have discernment.
	And she still doesn't understand who the players are.
	She still doesn't understand what's going on.
	So blinded by her love of Trump, She needs to focus more on Christ and on God rather than on this person who is anti-Christ with a lowercase a for now.
	Because that is the issue.
	When you look at the amount of money that they made, and again, Biden had his fundraiser with both Clinton and Obama made $25 million.
	Trump had one over the weekend.
	He made $50 million.
	Now, to put that in perspective, they're already in just one fundraiser.
	These guys got about as much money as was spent in the 2000 election for George W. Bush, Al Gore, the DNC, and the RNC combined.
	At that point in time, the RNC and the Democratic National Committee together spent $80 million on TV ads for the presidential campaign.
	These two guys just made 75.
	And it was far more than the 67 million that was spent in the previous election.
	And that was with Bush and Gore.
	And so the amount of money...
	It was being spent total for that.
	Both political parties, both of the campaigns directly, $147 million.
	And yet, look at this. They got more than half of that in just two fundraisers, these two guys.
	And then it got even more expensive.
	When you got to the 2008 campaign, the costliest in U.S. history up to that point.
	It had a record-shattering $5.3 billion spent by the candidates, the political parties, the interest groups, the congressional and presidential races.
	The nominees, Obama and John McCain in 2008, together spent more than a billion dollars.
	Unprecedented amounts of money.
	And yet it continued to go up.
	When we look at the 2008 election again, Obama spent...
	Obama raised $778 million.
	McCain, $383 million.
	Compare that to Chuck Baldwin, who got $261,000.
	$261,000. And then look at how much they spent per vote that they got.
	Obama spent $11 per vote that he got.
	McCain, $6 per vote that he got.
	Chuck Baldwin, $1 for every vote that he got.
	But of course, it's ballot access, which is really where the real issue is.
	But they go up significantly.
	You look at the 2000 election.
	The winner, George W. Bush, spent about $100 million with him and the RNC and other people for that.
	Al Gore accused him of buying the election because he had about 70, if I remember correctly.
	But if you look at the winners, the winner in 2100, the winner in 2004, 260.
	And that was just in the primaries, George W. Bush, who was the incumbent.
	And then you have Obama in 2008, you know, just under $800,000.
	And it continues to go up exponentially with these people.
	And so I thought it was interesting to see this statement from Michael Brown.
	And he's a Christian who writes on – he's a pastor, I guess, who writes on Christian Post and WND picks up his stuff.
	And he talks about his experience with Trump.
	And he says, you know, when I – in 2016 – He said, I wrote this.
	He said, And he said, and I ended it with an even stronger caution.
	I said, if you're a Trump supporter, you might say, well, I know he's not a Christian.
	I don't even think he's a real conservative, but I'm voting for him because I believe he's the best man to fix our economy, protect our borders, and so forth.
	He says, but I beg to differ.
	And he said, I think you're going to be sadly disappointed.
	And he said, I wound up voting for him because it was between him and Hillary.
	And he said he really liked his 2016 presidency.
	He liked the justices that were conservative-ish, is the way I'll put it, that he put on the Supreme Court.
	He had an executive order overturning the Johnson Amendment, which would say that you can't talk about politics in churches.
	But of course that wasn't necessary.
	That had already been shut down by the civil disobedience of pastors who called the IRS's bluff on it.
	He doesn't say anything about the executive orders to lock us down, to do warp speed, to do the masks, the social distancing, and all the rest of the stuff, or the financial chaos that ensued, or the debt that ensued, and all the rest of it.
	But he does pull it back, and he does say, look, start to focus on Christ and not on politicians.
	There is not a good case to be made for Trump.
	There's even a scarier case to be made for a second term of either Trump or Biden.
	But as I said before, we turn them into idols.
	We turn them into little demigods.
	And then we're ready to have a civil war over who is going to have that lever of power.
	He said, by worshiping Trump and focusing on him...
	He said, we damage our witness.
	We drive Americans, many young Americans, away from Christ.
	And that is absolutely true.
	Have a good day. Let me tell you.
	The David Knight Show.
	You can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?

▲