Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 15, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:53

The David Knight Show - 03/15/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 15th of March, year of our Lord 2024.
	Oh Not a day goes by that we don't get more information about how social media is being used as an opportunity to spy on everything that you do, of course.
	Even your cars are snitching to you, to the insurance companies, as we pointed out.
	But it is more than that.
	It is a kind of psychological warfare against us.
	And it is a manipulation of narratives.
	And we see that this is even going into video games.
	Very interesting back and forth between some company.
	It was called Sweet Baby.
	And we're going to talk about that because the FBI is now complaining about how they got a look for extremists on game platforms.
	People who are trying to push a radical agenda on us.
	Could they be talking about their own people?
	Sweet baby.
	Very strange.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us. Well, let's begin with this. This is a Reuters exclusive that came out last night.
	And I want to begin with this.
	Because you need to understand that this is not simply a Biden thing.
	Biden, Trump, Bush, Obama, all these people have been doing this.
	This is a bipartisan thing because the real government is the CIA. And this is the real purpose of the internet, the real purpose, especially of social media.
	Keep this in mind as we look at the backdrop of TikTok.
	And then think about the dangerous precedents being set up as they want to just be able to ban entire websites, entire applications, of course.
	We said that was going to happen.
	For the longest time, they would play games by demoting certain tweets, shadow banning certain people, then overtly banning people, you know, kicking us off of websites and anything.
	Many of you have had that happen to you as well.
	And then we said, well, of course, they're going to go for websites.
	That's what this TikTok stuff is.
	And guess who's bringing it to you, Republicans?
	Republicans. It is bipartisan.
	Democrats are pushing for it as well.
	But the Republicans are pushing real hard for it.
	As a matter of fact, Steve Bannon.
	Oh, Trump.
	He's now not for it.
	So he got bought off.
	He's probably right. I agree.
	You know, and of course, Steve Bannon knows Trump well.
	He knows he can be bought. We know he was bought.
	Pharmaceutical industry bought him.
	He was bought by many different industries, banks, pharmaceutical companies, from the very beginning.
	Now, two years into the Trump administration, this has just come out from Reuters, Trump authorized the CIA to launch a clandestine campaign on Chinese social media aimed at turning public opinion in China against its government, according to U.S. officials with direct knowledge of a highly classified operation.
	Now, throw all this into the mix of the TikTok stuff as well.
	Look, social media is being used by every government to manipulate its own citizens.
	It's being used by every government against other countries.
	And many of you will say, good, I don't like China.
	Well, I don't like China either.
	But the timing is interesting.
	This is two years into office.
	That's kind of a vague term.
	Is that 2018, 2019?
	You know, it's sworn in in 2017.
	And that's right about the time that, you know, he started promoting mandates for vaccines.
	The measles shot at that time.
	MMR. But it was also about the same time that all of these open purges started.
	You know, the 2018 midterm elections.
	About two years in it.
	It began with Infowars on August the 6th, and then two months later, in October, just before the November election, you had 800 sites that were purged.
	What did they have in common?
	Well, a good number of them supported Trump, but a lot of them, even more of them, did not.
	And I said at the time, look at what the common denominator is.
	That might tell you who's doing this.
	And the 800 sites that were kicked off, We're sites that were anti-war, that were anti-police surveillance state, and I believe that that was really the motivation.
	And so, yes, there are people inside the CIA. The CIA is not monolithic.
	There are people inside the CIA, obviously, trying to set up Trump and publicly doing it.
	Part of that, as well as the criticism from foreign leaders who Went, who used his vaccine, who marched in lockstep with him into this medical martial law of lockdown and everything.
	They were all doing the same thing at exactly the same time.
	But, you know, Trump, he's completely different from these other people.
	And I think that a lot of this stuff, even a lot of the CIA criticism of him is a game they're running on you folks.
	Not on you, but on the MAGA people.
	Oh, yeah, we're going to get him.
	We're going to get him. But, yeah, it's to keep him in line, but also to get his street creds up with the clueless masses who continue to follow him.
	A clandestine campaign on Chinese social media aimed at turning public opinion in China against its government.
	Well, the CIA would never do that here.
	They would never interfere in politics one way or the other, right?
	Of course, they do.
	And the people that we'll talk about, QAnon loves to talk about fifth-generation warfare, information, perception, that type of thing.
	But it's always just, there's nothing new about this.
	They just have new, more effective tools.
	So this had not previously been reported.
	And so although the U.S. officials declined to provide specific details of these operations, they said the disparaging narratives We're based, in fact, despite being secretly released by intelligence operatives under false cover.
	Oh, wait a minute. So they were true?
	Yeah, that's part of propaganda.
	You know, you can have black propaganda.
	You can have white propaganda.
	You can tell the truth.
	And tell the negative truth about someone or some entity.
	That's why when you take the stand, you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
	If you're selective about the truth, you can tell true stuff about people.
	And really take them down.
	That's what Satan does with us, right?
	He lies to us about God, but he tells the truth about us, doesn't he?
	So, yeah, you can tell the truth about the Chinese communists, and that's damaging enough.
	We tell the truth about the U.S. government.
	That's damaging enough for them to want to get rid of us, isn't it?
	A spokesperson for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said news.
	The CIA initiative shows the U.S. government uses the public opinion space and, this is quote, uses the public opinion space and media platforms as weapons to spread false information and to manipulate international public opinion.
	Duh. You think we don't know that?
	I mean, that is the whole purpose of the internet and the social media things.
	Now, Biden has continued this, you see.
	And that's the thing.
	It's precedent Trump.
	And then continued by Joe.
	And escalated, right?
	He continues these programs and he escalates them.
	Two intelligence historians told Reuters that when the White House grants the CIA a covert action authority through an order known as a presidential finding, it often remains in place across administrations.
	They ratchet up the power.
	And every one of these bureaucracies do that.
	Everything in the federal government does that.
	They seize power.
	This is why it's so important for us to come to terms with what Trump did with the lockdown and these other precedents that he set in 2020 that were so damaging.
	Because these types of presidential orders, whether you're talking about the CIA or you're talking about the lockdowns, these things remain there.
	If they steal power from us and we don't take it back, guess what?
	They keep it and they build on it as Biden did.
	It's interesting, this person who reported on this from Reuters identifies themselves as a reporter covering the intersection between technology and national security.
	That's interesting because for the longest time somebody wanted a bio on me and identified myself as a reporter covering the intersection between technology and liberty.
	They do the intersection between technology and national security.
	National security, by the way, is antithetical to liberty, to personal liberty, to the Constitution, everything else, always has been.
	So let's get to this sweet baby thing that I was talking about.
	Just another example of how they use every platform They use schools.
	They use television.
	They use movies.
	They use the internet.
	They use social media. They use video games.
	It's full spectrum, this psychological warfare against us.
	And so, it's been going on for a while.
	I didn't cover it because it's kind of off to the side.
	But it's this company.
	It's called Sweet Baby.
	And they have been, just to put it simply, they've been involved in adding a lot of political correctness and DEI. Now, I don't know if they were involved in the, I can't even remember the name of the game now.
	What is the one that's got Keep Your Rifle By Your Side?
	Travis, do you know that? One of the Far Cry, I think it was Far Cry 5.
	Yeah, that's right. Far Cry 5.
	Yeah. Keep your rifle by your side.
	I played that one day, you know.
	It's a great little song, and it's supposed to be the theme song for these Christian nationalists, if we will.
	It came out like a decade ago or something.
	But, you know, portraying people as Christian nationalists, kind of going back to the Branch Davidians, and they're clinging to their guns and their Bibles and all that kind of stuff, right?
	And they did this song, and it's a real catchy little tune, and everybody is reposting it, and they've got millions of views, and the comments on it are like the British thought that Yankee Doodle was an insult, and it became a very popular tune.
	Everybody liked it, you know, and that's what this song is.
	But, you know, it's that type of thing, to interject a psychological aspect to it.
	And this has been done, of course, with movies and television for a long time.
	You know, getting people accustomed to a predictive programming, you know, you show this horrible future that they're working to hit us with.
	But don't worry, we've got one lone hero who's going to save the day.
	And so people were like, oh, well, that's good.
	Boy, that was looking really bad until John Connor came out there and took out all those robots.
	You know, one guy did it.
	I sure am glad we got President Trump, aren't you?
	He's our John Connor, isn't he?
	Yeah, that's what they want to say.
	They want to say at both ends of this fable, right?
	And actually, the bad stuff, the dystopian thing, that's the real thing.
	The fable is the fact that Trump is a John Connor, that there's going to be some John Connor to save us.
	It's crazy. But anyway, they do that all the time.
	And so they do that in the games as well.
	Predictive programming, manipulating people, all the rest of this stuff, right?
	And so, some of the people started noting that there was one company, in particular Sweet Baby, that seemed to be a common thread with a lot of these things, pushing a lot of this DEI stuff.
	And so, in late February, early part of this month, this is the way it's described by Know Your Meme, because it's become a meme, the Sweet Baby.
	Sweet Baby Incorporated Detected.
	And some people, some of the guys set up on Steam, a group or a page was set up to identify which games had been influenced by this Sweet Baby company.
	And so they put up Sweet Baby Detected.
	Now, you would think if it was a legitimate business, right?
	You would think that, yeah, they'd be proud of the fact that we had a part in this big video game.
	We had a big part in that video game.
	I mean, it's called credits in the movies, right?
	They run these credits, and everybody gets really upset if they're not credited with something.
	Sweet Baby doesn't want to be credited.
	Why not? See, that's the dog that didn't bark.
	It tells you who it's coming from, isn't it?
	Right? They're beating their chest like Donald Trump and trumpeting what they're doing.
	But no, they don't want you to know.
	And instead, what they did was Sweet Baby Incorporated came after the Sweet Baby Incorporated detected group.
	They wanted to get that group shut down.
	Stop telling people what we're doing!
	That's how badly they wanted to remain anonymous.
	How do you spell DEI? I think it's spelled CIA, isn't it?
	Isn't that the correct spelling of DEI? Anyway, or FBI. Maybe that's it.
	Maybe you spell D-E-I-F-B-I is the correct spelling.
	You know, the other one is just kind of an encoded twist.
	So, the FBI is getting involved in looking at extremers.
	Extremers. Gamers who are extremists.
	I guess we could call them extremers.
	You're an extremer. Um...
	The FBI and Homeland Security.
	Isn't it great? Isn't it great that Homeland Security is focused on gamers who are critical of the government or don't follow their narratives?
	Homeland Security is not interested in our border.
	Homeland Security is interested in gamers.
	Domestic gamers.
	There you go. So, domestic violent extremists.
	This is what FBI says.
	Domestic violent extremists use social media and gaming platforms for several purposes, including to reach wide audiences, to insert their extremist ideas under the mainstream, to radicalize, to recruit, and to mobilize others.
	I think this is pure projection, because that's what they do.
	The FBI, Homeland Security, CIA, use gaming platforms to reach white audiences.
	And the FBI and CIA and Homeland Security use it to insert their extremist ideas in the mainstream.
	The FBI, Homeland Security, and CIA use it to radicalize, recruit, and mobilize others, right?
	That's exactly what they do.
	Yeah, sweet baby...
	I think this is a baby we need to throw out with the bathwater.
	Completely throw it out.
	Now, as they're militarizing the subway, I said from the very beginning, you know, what this is about is getting people used to living under martial law.
	It doesn't really do any good.
	As a matter of fact, there's a video up of the fight that happened on the subway.
	And apparently, although, you know, before the shooting actually happened, We're good to go.
	And the black guy gets the white guy down.
	He's beating him and stuff like that.
	And then some other guy comes along.
	Another black guy comes along.
	He was not in a uniform or anything.
	I mean, there wasn't anybody.
	And see, this is the point.
	They've had several shootings.
	And so what the governor says is we're going to put 1,000 armed people there, 250 state police and 750 National Guard.
	And we showed you the pictures of them in uniform holding fully automatic weapons, and they've got the TSA tables checking people's bags and all the rest of this stuff.
	And we're going to stop it.
	We'll show a force. And I said, well, no, what they're doing is they're getting people accustomed to living under martial law.
	Just as they got kids accustomed to school lockdowns.
	And then they locked down the entire country after about 20 or 30 years of training people through schools.
	Oh, lockdown, lockdown. You know, going to keep you safe.
	And so with all of these troops, a thousand police and, you know, and troops around there, not a single one on this particular train.
	And this thing went on for quite some time.
	And then, you know, so one guy comes and breaks it up.
	And they're still...
	The black guy's bigger than the Hispanic guy, and he's taunting him.
	And then he goes to his jacket or something, and he pulls out his gun.
	Somehow he gets the gun, he pulls out, and you hear him racket, right?
	So, and everybody's like, yeah, you know, get me out of here.
	They can't, because the train is moving.
	But they're pressed up to the thing, and whoever is videotaping it, you know, is showing all the people around him, they're screaming, get me out of here, get me out of here, you know, and he's trying to get out as well, or she.
	And then the door opens, and it's a mad rush out, and as their mad rush is going out, you hear the gunshots.
	Evidently, in the time that this person was shooting it, and it happened, the bigger guy, the black guy, got the gun, and he's threatening the smaller Hispanic guy.
	But there was evidently a struggle, and the smaller guy got the gun away from him and shot him in the head.
	This was in Brooklyn, during rush hour.
	Man shot in the head following a heated fistfight on a packed Brooklyn subway train.
	According to police in the video of the incident.
	Now, the question is, they've got all these TSA checkpoints.
	They've got a thousand armed, uniformed people.
	But they can't put the people on the trains.
	And they evidently, with these TSA checkpoints, they don't seem to work on the subway, do they?
	Just like they don't work on the planes or anything else like that.
	I mean, you know, they fail like 90% of the time when people do that.
	They do catch some people not trying to hide anything.
	They just absentmindedly get used to carrying their gun all the time and they forget when they go to travel.
	They're in a hurry, I guess. But the bag checks didn't work.
	The army of people there didn't work.
	And you know, the thing is, they've got gun control too, don't they?
	This guy violated gun control laws.
	You know, it's against the law to have a gun like that in New York.
	And it's also against the law to take it on the subway.
	How dare him do that?
	Oh, by the way, it's against the law to shoot somebody in the head too, isn't it?
	Yeah, you see, they don't care about that kind of stuff.
	And they don't care about that kind of stuff.
	And even with a thousand cops and soldiers on the subway, It seems like they're never around when you need them, doesn't it?
	Because you can't carry them on your back.
	It's easier to carry a gun, as they say.
	Carry a gun because it's a lot lighter than carrying a police officer around with me.
	Well, meanwhile, you have the radical Marxists who are really showing their colors and flying their flags.
	And I'm not talking about just Justin Trudeau.
	Yeah, he's shown it big time.
	Justin Trudeau, chip off the old Castro block, isn't he?
	Actually, he's looking even more like a chip off the Stalinist block.
	Wanting to pre-crime lock up people.
	You're the kind of person, you're just the kind of person that might say something that somebody would be offended at.
	And certain people, certain people groups must not be offended.
	I think we're just going to have to put you in jail for life.
	That's one of the things they can do.
	And they can do it pre-crime.
	So, it's to protect people who don't like, certain groups of people who don't like certain things being said.
	Well, this is in the head of College Park, Maryland's Racial Equity Department.
	This woman aims to eliminate systemic racism in local government.
	She supports, quote, black liberation, unquote, through revolutionary means.
	And she praises a plan, quote, how we will eat and live and grow after we burn it all down.
	It's not DEI. It's not woke.
	It's Marxism.
	It's just that simple. This is old Stalinist types of Marxism, weaponized politically.
	And as Trudeau is trying to get that law put into Canada, of course, it's already been installed in many European countries, in Belgium, for example.
	The nationalists that I talked about yesterday, sentenced to prison for one year over hateful memes.
	It turns out, however, that they went back seven years to find memes when he was like in college.
	And he didn't send those memes.
	But the judge said, you should have stopped those memes from being sent.
	Because in this private group of about 750 people, You understand this is purely political, right?
	This is a purely political prosecution, a persecution.
	He is now the head.
	He started a political group, a conservative anti-immigration group.
	And they want to take him down.
	And they'll use any excuse.
	And if you remember, as they were beginning, the internet beginning, all of these social media companies, they also had their total information awareness, life log.
	Everybody said, we don't want the government keeping a life log of everybody.
	Okay, we'll shut it down. The next day, Facebook opens up.
	Things like that. Belgian nationalist activist, former member of parliament, just been sentenced to a year in prison, a 16,000 euro fine, and 10 years of deprived civil rights, which means that he will not be able to run for office.
	Problem solved! And so Keith Woods put on Twitter, he said, I had the pleasure of meeting...
	This guy last year, he was one of the most professional, dedicated activists I've encountered.
	His party is currently topping the polls in Belgium.
	So let's arrest the leader, right?
	This is like Putin.
	This is like Stalin. They attack people like this because it works.
	It's very effective.
	And so Elon Musk drew attention to this.
	And, you know, there were some memes up there.
	He said, somebody else sent this meme in a group chat, and you were given a prison sentence, he tweeted to him.
	And he said, yes.
	And even though the judge and the media admitted that I never sent any of these memes, he argued that I should have done more to keep others from sending them.
	They labeled the memes hate speech.
	They were jokes. Punishable as a criminal offense in Belgium.
	So, he actually speaks English.
	And this is what the guy who is now going to be kicked out of politics for 10 years and is going to jail, what he had to say.
	Every cornerstone of a healthy society is being deconstructed.
	Men are no longer men, women are no longer women, and all the mental illnesses in between are applauded and celebrated.
	Our environment is being polluted on a massive scale.
	Celebrities, politicians and bankers that go to a private island to molest children are given free reign while nationalist activists are getting locked up without a trial for going to a protest.
	Our people, Are being poisoned with processed foods, with pornography, drugs, and Hollywood wokeness.
	Our cities, once the center of civilization, are now multicultural hellholes.
	Given these realities, one might argue that this is anything but the greatest time to be alive.
	You'd say all of these things don't really make a man happy.
	But they do present us with what we as Europeans need.
	An enormous challenge.
	They give us purpose. And that is why this is the greatest time to be alive.
	We men of the West, we were not made to just sit back and enjoy life.
	We weren't made to chase happiness.
	Those who chase happiness will end up unhappy.
	Instant gratification is making you depressed.
	Those who chase meaning and purpose instead of happiness, on the other hand, they will live fulfilling and meaningful lives and thus end up being the happy ones.
	It's because we Europeans, we were made to live an easy life.
	We are the outcome of hardship and adversity.
	It's our nature to fight, to struggle, to suffer, to honor our ancestors, to achieve great and glorious things.
	And I've got good news for everyone here today.
	Because there's never been a better time to achieve those things than now.
	Well, that's interesting.
	Do you think that they're going to shut him up?
	He's going to be like, bring it on.
	He'll get stronger than ever before.
	Probably. Probably. Now, he doesn't mention his religious foundation.
	You know, your determination to change society can only carry you so far in difficult times.
	But there have been people who have gone the entire length just on that alone.
	He'd be even stronger if he's a Christian.
	I don't know if he is or not. He didn't mention that there.
	I don't think somehow, though, that they're going to...
	I think they're only going to strengthen the movement.
	They're going to validate everything that he was just saying there.
	And you heard all the different talking points that he had there.
	I mean, that's this show. It could be me.
	It could be you. They do that, too.
	And we must not run away from this.
	We have to confront this.
	Because it'll only get worse.
	It'll only get worse. As a matter of fact, this is what Congressman Massey said about the TikTok ban after the vote he had this to say.
	The gentleman from Kentucky is recognized.
	Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
	I know the other side is sincere, and we've not questioned that here today, and I won't question their sincerity.
	I would. In fact, I think they've identified at least three problems that we have in America.
	Moral decay of our society, invasion of Americans' privacy, and our competitiveness with China.
	But in this case, their cure is worse than the disease's.
	You know, there are ways to get at these root problems.
	We just haven't taken it upon ourselves to address those root problems with actual legislative solutions that have been put forth here in Congress.
	For instance, Mr.
	Warren Davidson's The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act.
	We'd put a strong stake in the ground to protect Americans' privacy, whether it's from our own government or some foreign governments.
	That is the kind of thing we need.
	We need warrants in the FISA program.
	Our government shouldn't be able to spy on Americans without a warrant, yet they are.
	Let's bring that to the floor and vote on it.
	These are the kind of cures we need, not the bill that's offered here today.
	The bill that's offered here today, even though I know it's offered genuinely, it could also be named the Facebook Protection and Enhancement Act.
	Because it's not the American people who are going to benefit most from this.
	It will be Facebook. Their stock is going to go up if this bill should pass the Senate.
	Now what are some ways that we could improve this bill?
	Well, it should at least have a sunset.
	I mean, that's the only reason we're able to debate whether FISA should have warrants in it, because it sunsets.
	And what have we observed?
	FISA's been abused.
	That's my concern with this TikTok ban.
	It will be abused.
	If it's just banning TikTok and ByteDance and copies of that, why does it need to be 13 pages long?
	Exactly. And I know they say it doesn't ban it.
	It forces divestiture of the company.
	This sounds like when American companies try to do business in third world countries and a dictator says, well, you can do business here.
	You just got to give me your company.
	And now you can continue to do business.
	It sounds like China doesn't.
	Take over Ford Motor Company for selling Ford cars in their country.
	Yet that's what we're wanting to do here.
	We become what we fight.
	You know, this is a cure that is worse than the disease.
	Who's going to be prosecuted by this bill?
	Is it ByteDance or TikTok?
	Will they be taken to court?
	No! I mean, they're the target of this, but how do you elicit or effect a ban on them?
	By prosecuting Americans.
	The only way you can ban TikTok and the other companies from being here is to say what this bill says, which is, we will bring civil action, the government will bring a civil action suit against you if you so much as host them here.
	If you have an app store that allows them to be here.
	You are an American or an American company, and you will be the target of this bill.
	Those are the only people who can be pursued under this bill.
	And I know it's in order to go after TikTok, or so they say.
	Well, I would just close by saying that, you know, we're sitting here with phones made in China.
	We're wearing suits made in China.
	We drove cars here with chips that are made in China.
	And they're our foreign adversary.
	And by golly, we're going to do something about it.
	What are we going to do? You're going to tell Americans they can't put a piece of software on their computer.
	They can't go to certain websites that the president designates.
	So I urge my colleagues to oppose this well-intentioned bill because it will have bad consequences and I yield back the balance of my time.
	Well, he's exactly right.
	Did you notice what he said there about civil asset lawsuit?
	It probably won't be a lawsuit.
	With civil asset forfeiture.
	They can just come in and say, well, I don't have to prove anything.
	I'm coming after the app.
	And that means that I'm going to confiscate everything that's here.
	I'm not charging you with a crime.
	I'm not going to give you a trial either.
	I'm just going to take everything.
	Theft. That's the way these people operate.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	When we come back, we're going to take a look at DEI and something that is hopeful that just happened about that.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APS radio.com Hi, I'm Johnnie Robinson.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Johnnie Robinson.
	And I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	Well, let's begin with the racism that's being inculcated by these Marxists who are using this to sow social discord, division, civil war, and all the rest of this.
	And it truly is racism.
	And I'll just mention again, you know, when the Marxists, they have to have a struggle.
	It was always an economic class struggle in Europe.
	That wasn't working here.
	And then you had Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn, the weatherman, realize that, hey, we could use race to achieve that in the United States better.
	And so there was already a theory out there called white skin privilege.
	And they just shortened it up to white privilege, and they stopped bombing buildings.
	They got off, and some other people in the weather underground went to jail, but not them.
	And they went into education and got involved in Chicago with Obama and other people.
	But it had a big impact in education, got this white-skinned privilege stuff put through.
	The roots of all this are Marxist.
	And, of course, we talked about Mao's America, a survivor's warning.
	And the lady who wrote that grew up in China.
	She saw all of this.
	None of this is any different whatsoever than what they did in China.
	It's just that they have a different MacGuffin.
	A different thing that you're supposedly fighting over.
	But it's exactly the same tactic and exactly the same end goal there.
	And so we have in the London Theater, there's going to be a play that's going to be running this summer from July to September.
	But they have blocked off two nights, and they call it a blackout.
	I guess it should be called a whiteout because white people can't come to the play that night.
	Only black people can go to the play that night.
	Two nights. White people will not be welcome.
	They call it a blackout, but it's actually a whiteout.
	Get out of here, whites.
	Upcoming West End Theater show for Slave Play.
	That's the name of the play.
	We'll have blackout nights for black identifying audience.
	So I guess you can still go as long as you're like Rachel DeLiesel and you identify as a black person even though you're not.
	That's what they call it, black-identifying audience.
	They'll ban any white people from attending two special performances in that theater.
	Well, I just, I really wanted to see that.
	Sounded like a great play.
	Ibram X. Kendi, the racist, he says, we need present discrimination against white people to make up for past discrimination.
	Well, you know, the problem is, two wrongs don't make a right.
	What they make is a feud.
	They make a civil war.
	They did that to us. We're going to do it back to them.
	As one person commented...
	Talking about their announcement, this guy is absolutely giddy about being an out and proud racist.
	He can't believe his luck that he's allowed to say this stuff out loud.
	And it's everywhere in the UK. One person said, well, now we know who the real bigots are, don't we?
	But if you have a difference of opinion, just as we saw in Belgium, With a guy, and he's part of a movement.
	You heard he spoke fluent English, but he also speaks, he also, that area of Belgium, Flanders, is really more closely aligned with the Netherlands than they speak Dutch in general.
	And so that's another aspect of that, people seeking to have self-governance.
	But in the UK, another person went to prison.
	This guy got two years, not one year, but two years over some stickers.
	And they said that he was intending to stir up racial hatred with various anti-immigration stickers.
	Things like White Lives Matter.
	This is in the UK where this play is.
	Why are the people in that play not being charged with the same thing?
	Why are they going to jail for two years?
	Because they are trying to stir up racial hatred, no doubt about it.
	That's the point of their play.
	That's the point of their blackout nights or whiteout nights, I should say.
	That's what they should call them.
	They call them blackout night. He says, we'll be a minority in our homeland by 2066.
	Now, of course, the truth is no defense against these tyrants because that is true.
	I don't think it'll be that long before at the rate that they're bringing people in.
	A 34-year-old man charged in charge of an online collection of downloadable stickers that contained anti-immigration messages.
	And they said other people use these stickers.
	And so he's the center of all this.
	You look at this. And this is what I warned about the drug war.
	I said, look, I don't like any of these drugs.
	I don't use any of these drugs.
	But when you start setting up prohibition, you give all kinds of power to government.
	And just as we saw with alcohol prohibition, which was done correctly, legally, I should say.
	It was done legally with a constitutional amendment.
	They never did the drug war legally.
	That's why it's nullified.
	That's one lesson to learn from it.
	But the other thing, and so many, well more than half of the states.
	But when you start to give them this kind of power, They never pull back.
	And so now we've got a situation where people, these kinds of authoritarian, dystopian, let's forget about the law, we're just going to use civil asset forfeiture.
	We're just going to grab everything you've got.
	Because, you know, drugs are so bad.
	And we've got to do this through law enforcement.
	So let's keep ramping up the law enforcement to be more and more police state, more and more totalitarian.
	And eventually what happens is they start using these tactics against other things.
	They came up with a RICO statute to come after organized crime.
	What did they wind up doing? They wound up using the RICO statute against pro-life protesters.
	Randy Alcorn was a pastor, a very well-known author.
	He was a very successful author.
	His books were selling.
	He had fiction books. He also had Christian theology books that he was writing, Treasure Principle, a great book.
	But he was also, he and his wife got involved in helping a young pregnant woman through Crisis Pregnancy Center.
	And then that drew him in, and he got more involved in that.
	And so Planned Parenthood came after him with a RICO statue, and they got a judgment against him.
	And so for 20 years, he was determined that he was not going to pay them a penny.
	He gave away all the royalties to the books that he sold, and he lived on minimum wage.
	And just paid himself, you know, had the publishers pay him the very minimum that you could live off of for 20 years.
	And it was a real blessing to him.
	Again, that's kind of where the treasure principle comes from.
	You're talking about somebody who's not going to sell out.
	That was Randy Alcorn.
	But, you know, it's a RICO statue that was used against them.
	And so, you know, that had its origin.
	And looking at something like drug addiction and drug use, something that is a medical, a psychological, but especially a spiritual problem, and saying, let's let government fix it.
	Government's got one tool.
	It's got a hammer. And everything looks like a nail to it.
	And so they've taken a hammer to the justice system.
	They've taken a hammer to the Constitution.
	They've taken a hammer to everything in our life with a drug war.
	So anyway, I had slogans like, we'll be a minority in our homeland by 2066.
	And so they're giving him two years in prison.
	His wife is eight months pregnant.
	He will not be there when the child is born.
	Elon Musk reposted it and added, like he does, to draw people's attention to it.
	He adds a couple of exclamation marks, like, whoa, look at this.
	And so Keith Woods addressed him and said, Elon, he said, Sam's X account is suspended.
	along with his wife Laura. Seeing how unfair the British justice system is to people that advocate for their people, perhaps you should reconsider their suspensions and give them a chance to defend themselves.
	Some of the people who are still purged there on the free speech platform of Twitter. Elsewhere in the UK, and we're going to get to the United States in a minute here, the Church of England hiring an officer to, quote, deconstruct whiteness.
	This is what the Church of England is.
	Like I said, when you mix politics and religion, what you get is politics.
	It's just a political organization.
	It has nothing to do with Christianity.
	Nothing to do with Christianity.
	Hiring a deconstructing whiteness officer as part of a new racial justice unit, the Church of England, this big bureaucracy there.
	A female bishop commented on this.
	And said, we need to further embed racial justice.
	And we should not be afraid of being called woke.
	Well, I'm not going to call you woke.
	You're a Marxist. I'm not going to use your terms, your labels.
	And one person replied and said, the irony of many of these projects is that they're importing American perspectives and overlaying them on a country that is incredibly tolerant.
	Well, I don't know. I think they may be ahead of us in terms of implementation.
	It is, of course, a globalist agenda.
	One could say that the global governance that is now in place is headquartered in America.
	We have so much control over the UN and NATO and all these different organizations.
	But he says no less than 80% of the worldwide Anglican communion is black.
	And their black theology is very conservative.
	But you never see the church paying attention to any of that.
	Yeah, outside of England, especially in Africa, he's right.
	They have very conservative Anglican Christians.
	They began in that tradition, but they haven't gotten involved in British politics at that time.
	That's the thing that's corrupted them in England.
	But then, let's go to Florida.
	And, you know, I have my concerns when I'm talking about free speech.
	I have my concerns about what the Republicans and DeSantis have done in terms of hate speech.
	I don't think there should ever be any hate speech laws, especially not criminal laws.
	And they did that, and that's reprehensible.
	However, having said that, and I oppose that, I support what they've done with DEI. And we need to understand that the real fountainhead for all this stuff is the colleges.
	That's really where this is coming out.
	And he and others have taken that on.
	They've actually taken over a small college.
	I think it's in Sarasota, maybe.
	It's kind of a spinoff from the University of South Florida in Tampa, where I went.
	and, well that place was crazy when I went there 50 years ago.
	They had some full-on Marxists that were there.
	I didn't even argue with them, I just dropped their class, this is a waste of time, and would start over again with some other instructor, some other different class.
	But anyway, they've already done this in a small college.
	And then the legislature passed and the governor signed an act saying that none of the Florida universities would have DEI staff.
	And so the first one to comply with this, evidently, I don't see that anybody else has done it.
	University of Florida, I don't see that FSU or USF or any of these others have done it.
	They fired all of their DEI people effective immediately.
	To comply with the Florida Board of Governors' regulation on prohibited expenditures, the University of Florida has closed the office of the Chief Diversity Officer, eliminated DEI positions and administrative appointments, and halted DEI-focused contracts with outside vendors, said a statement from the Provost.
	Approximately $5 million in funds previously allocated to DEI initiatives will now be reallocated into a faculty recruitment fund.
	Maybe they could even get some people who are not full-on Marxist as faculty.
	That'd be an interesting change.
	In January, Florida's Board of Governors voted to ban state funding on DEI programs across all public universities in the state.
	But again, it seems like the University of Florida is the first one to do it so far.
	Ben Sasse, the former congressman, went there.
	He was a Republican, but...
	He's kind of, a lot of people kind of saw him as a really kind of left-leaning, quote-unquote moderate type of Republican.
	But he became the president.
	Maybe that's why they're doing it first.
	Florida's one of a dozen state legislatures that have introduced or passed bills to limit or to eliminate DEI programs in state colleges or universities, if your state is not one of these.
	Then make sure that it is.
	We need to get rid of these things.
	Again, like I said, this is the fountainhead of this Marxist theory that is there.
	The news comes about one week after College Fix had an exclusive investigative report noting that the University of Florida employs one administrator for every four undergraduates.
	I think they're a little bit heavy on the administration side, don't you?
	Ha ha ha ha! With some of the administrative overhead related to the university's DEI initiatives.
	Yeah, they're spending $5 million a year on DEI. University of Florida's DEI initiatives consisted of an equivalent of 24 full-time employees.
	The initiatives cost the university $5.3 million.
	$3.3 million of it is state-funded.
	The chief diversity officer, Marsha McGriff, She doesn't spell that with a T. It's two Fs.
	But she should have spelled it with a McGrift.
	McGrift made $300,000 a year pushing this DEI stuff according to public records.
	And that was back in November 2022.
	Maybe she got a raise last year.
	Gave herself a raise. Probably did.
	Look, this is the point of this, too.
	We're not helpless.
	We're not hopeless. We can do something about this.
	It can be fixed at the state level.
	Imagine this. We've got Biden as president, and you just had Florida kill DEI in their university system.
	How did that happen? It's the money.
	It's how you control things.
	It's how you control things.
	It's how the state government can control this stuff.
	They give money out to these universities, and then if they don't do what they like, they pull it back.
	Obama, through the Department of Education and all these other presidents, have said, well, we would like for you to teach this.
	We'd like for you to put boys in the girls' bathrooms and showers.
	And if you don't do that, they pull the money away.
	And then Trump says, we'd like for you to lock down people, keep them six feet apart, have them wear masks, give them fines, beat them up, do all the rest of this stuff, and I've got a vaccine, you know, help me with all of this stuff.
	And he pays them. He pays them.
	He pays the hospitals to kill people.
	He pays them to do it. And if they don't do it, they pull the money back.
	That's how it works at the federal level.
	That's how it works with the president, how it works with the governors.
	That's why it's important for two things.
	First of all, you don't need to get control of the federal government to make a change.
	You can change it at the state level.
	And you can change it at the local level as well.
	And you can change it at the personal level.
	When we're talking about education, it always amazes me to see people who have the motivation to create a private school or they have the motivation to homeschool their children and then they come around and they beg for a government handout.
	Do you realize what you're doing to yourself?
	You're putting chains on yourself with this money.
	The money are chains and strings that will be used to control you.
	And if you get the right person in, they can start yanking those chains around and pull those DEI people that are paying themselves $300,000 a year right out of the university.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, they say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪
	Liberty. It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back, and I want to cover a couple of comments from listeners.
	This is from a long-term supporter of ours on Subscribestar, For the Love of the Road.
	He said, Tony, talking about matching tips on Rumble last week, reminded me about the issues that you had months ago.
	Is Rumble doing better at getting checks in the mail?
	Yes, they are. It was really kind of strange.
	They were just kind of collecting stuff and letting it go for a couple of months.
	And there wasn't any way that we could tell them, send the check.
	They'd just do it whenever they wanted to.
	And then all of a sudden, you know, and then they send the check and we don't get it.
	And two months go by and we don't get it.
	You know, the check is in the mail. Well, actually, it was a real mess.
	I don't know what happened, but after about two or three months, and that was about three months worth of things, they finally canceled that and reissued another check.
	And then the other check showed up.
	So I don't know what's going on.
	But yeah, they're doing fine with it now, and it's more regular.
	So we did have a strange thing that happened yesterday with Rumble.
	And Karen was looking at the feed, and she took a snapshot of it.
	She thought it was so strange. There's all these people who are commenting on the side.
	And it said, one viewer.
	One viewer. One view.
	Really, really strange.
	So, there are some things that are going on.
	Perhaps it's just growing pains, and maybe there's no DEI subversity going on.
	I hope not, anyway.
	And so thank you.
	I appreciate that for the love of the road.
	I appreciate your support there on Subscribestar.
	And by the way, I just want to say, just saw an email.
	I meant to mention it yesterday in the morning.
	I haven't gone through to total up and thank people for Zelle.
	A lot of people have contributed on Zelle.
	I really do appreciate that.
	We get that right away, and there's no fee attached to that right now at this point.
	So it's kind of an interesting thing that's happening there.
	Maybe it's like a temporary test from the banks to...
	See if people want to use it or not.
	But I do appreciate that.
	And I wanted to thank Benjamin for our very generous contribution that we got yesterday.
	But I'll put this together and let everybody know.
	I believe we're on par for this month so far.
	We're right about half, even though I don't think we've updated the gas gauge that far.
	But that's about where we are.
	Speaking of things stuck in the mail, we just got this back.
	And this package was sent to a listener who ordered something in Israel.
	And they kicked this package out of Israel.
	I don't know. It's almost like I'm on the ADL list or something like that.
	And proud of it, by the way.
	But, yeah, it's got these three yellow stickers that are on there that you can see.
	It's in English and it's in Hebrew.
	And it has reason for non-delivery.
	And they have different things like unknown, moved, incomplete, address, refused, unclaimed, other.
	And none of those boxes are checked.
	And there's three of these labels on there.
	Nothing is checked. There's no reason given for why it was returned.
	We're trying to contact the person.
	This was actually shipped December the 15th, 2022.
	2022. Not last year.
	I looked at it, it's December 15th, and I was like, well, it's certainly taken a while to get this thing back.
	But no, this was 2022, the middle of December.
	So I apologize. I won't mention the person's name.
	I don't know what's going on with all this stuff.
	But we're going to try to contact them and let them know.
	But I wanted to mention it on the show because I don't know if we can find this person.
	It's been so long. It's been, what, a year and three or four months since this thing was sent?
	It's been floating around in limbo.
	Yeah, let's talk about elections by mail, okay?
	And then this was sent by Aaron.
	He said, I was just watching your Monday show where you were talking about measles and how people used to have chicken pox parties.
	He said, this is a clip from an old Simpsons episode.
	And he said, where they highlighted exactly that.
	Nobody died.
	And there was no need for any poison injections.
	Thought you might consider showing this on your show.
	I love this. This is the Simpsons talking about the little baby gets chicken pox.
	And they have a pox party.
	Sweetie, I know it itches, but you've gotta stop scratching.
	No! No!
	Here, here, play with your teddy bear.
	Oh, sugar booger.
	Oh, poor Maggie.
	Homer, don't touch her.
	You've never had chicken pox.
	I know, and you did, and you're great.
	Oh, I'm just saying, it's very dangerous if you get it as an adult.
	Hey, Homer, why the sourpuss?
	Did you chug-a-lug a skunky Snapple?
	I don't know, maybe.
	Plus, my wife won't let me inside because the baby's got chicken pox.
	Really? Do you mind if I bring my boys over so she can infect Rod and Todd?
	Why would you do that?
	Are you a bad parent?
	You see, Rod and Todd could only get the chicken pox once, and childhood's the safest time.
	So you want Maggie to infect your kids?
	You betcha! In fact, it's so fair to be known to old pox parties so other kids in the neighborhood can get the disease when they please.
	Welcome to our pox party.
	Save room for punch. Maggie's bathing in the bowl.
	Ladies and gentlemen, presenting the sister with the blisters, the tot with all the spots, Maggie!
	This is before they had the COVID masks and everything, so he's got a full-on shirt.
	I feel like a chicken already!
	I just made an egg in my pants!
	March, what's happening to me?
	Oh, homie, you've got chickenpox.
	What the hell? I don't know.
	I kept away from Maggie all day.
	Oh, I'm so itchy.
	Oh, yeah.
	You sit in this oatmeal a while and it'll send your itchies packing.
	Mmm, homerose.
	Stop eating the oatmeal.
	That's the third time you've eaten.
	Hello? No, I'm not coming into work.
	I have chicken pox.
	I know I said that last month, but I was lying.
	I love you, bye.
	I just got fired.
	And of course...
	Of course, you see his phone there.
	That kind of dates it as well, doesn't it?
	I don't know how you pronounce his last name.
	Is it Grunig or something?
	Yeah. But the guy that did The Simpsons, I looked up his age.
	He's the same age as I am, essentially.
	Now, Trump is 10 years older than both of us, and he knows that nobody considered these childhood diseases to be really a big issue.
	You wanted to get them when you were a child because it was easier to deal with it.
	And then you never had it again.
	That's why they call them childhood diseases.
	I tried to explain it to Breitbart the other day when we covered it.
	They were saying, well, just because I call it a childhood disease doesn't mean it isn't really, really serious.
	You know, and then tried to pump up fear.
	And of course, Trump is trying to pump up fear.
	Got to get that shot, right?
	They have to get the shot. The vaccinations are so important.
	Mandated. They're really going around now.
	Mandated shot. He's pushing the mandates.
	We don't care about your religious exemptions or your medical exemptions.
	You've got to get the shot. And I've always said he knows better.
	Matt Gronig knows better.
	I know better. And again, Trump is 10 years older than us.
	He grew up without a shot, and I'm sure that he got it, because it is very contagious, and you get it once.
	Once and done.
	But now, the reason this is being done, and it's been put out there by ABC, NBC, CBS, people like that, The Hill, but especially Breitbart.
	And that's the thing that really bothered me, seeing it.
	What are they doing with this?
	Now, you know why the mainstream media is doing it?
	Because they want to build business for their sponsors.
	You know, everybody is...
	Good Morning America is brought to you by Pfizer.
	We're all brought to you by Pfizer.
	So they want to drum up money for their sponsor there, right?
	But the reason that it's being pushed by Breitbart is because they want to scare people about the border situation.
	How reprehensible is this?
	But of course we saw a lot of the big con media, the big conservative media, conning people with fear about the pandemic at the very beginning of this.
	So they could sell you storable food, masks, and all the rest of the stuff.
	That's what Alex did at Infowars.
	And so you've got these, now they're trying to scare people about the border.
	And look, there's reasons that we need to close the border.
	Many reasons that it needs to be controlled.
	But you don't need to add something like this because this is, first of all, a lie.
	Secondly, it has some very bad consequences when you start pushing this stuff.
	You're pushing their mandated vaccine narrative.
	And that's what they're doing.
	They said, look at this. These people coming across the border, they haven't been given their childhood vaccines.
	It's just disease.
	These people are disease coming across here.
	They are... Illegal diseases coming right across the border.
	And so the CDC is going to be sending a team of experts to support the local response in Chicago after a lot of these filthy immigrants coming in with their measles and stuff where nobody died.
	Nobody died. They had a child who died at one of these centers, and that was the headline of Breitbart.
	And it says measles, you know, where a child died.
	They had a child die of measles?
	I'd never heard of that as we were having our pox parties, and I looked at it.
	And that was the other thing that really bothered me that Breitbart did.
	They implied, strongly implied in the headline, although in the body of the article, if you look at it, that the child did not die from measles.
	But they imply that the child did die from measles.
	They get you to read the article and then they tell you, you know, about one out of X number of thousand people we had as a serious case or something.
	People could die. Well, it's no different than the flu.
	Same thing is true about the flu.
	So go stay in your room forever so you never catch a cold from anybody.
	Load yourself up with a whole bunch of layers of cloth masks and you'll be fine.
	You'll be fine. So the Chicago Health Department said it evaluated and immunized 900 shelter residents against measles, mumps, and rubella, the MMR shot.
	So they were able to give out about 1,000 shots for the corporate sponsor, Pfizer.
	Over the weekend. And then they assess the immunity status of 700.
	Probably 700 other people will probably have to give it to them just to be safe.
	Don't you think? I think everybody's got to get it.
	Meanwhile, we have a legal group that is challenging.
	One of these cases that has been used to try to give legal authority for the government to mandate health care to you.
	This is Jacob v.
	Massachusetts. 119-year-old case.
	And if you remember this... When people like Trump crony Alan Dershowitz is bragging about the fact, I would have the government come down, not just coerce you, not just say, if you don't do this, you're going to lose your job or your education or whatever.
	I would have the military come in or whoever, people come in and drag you out by force and forcibly inject you, and I would defend that before the Supreme Court, and I would win, he said.
	Well, there are people, a lot of people, and he cited this case, Jacob v.
	Massachusetts. And so that is questionable whether or not that would support that.
	But now, a group called the New Civil Liberties Alliance, NCLA, has a court case over the vaccine mandate, so they brought up to the Supreme Court, and they're asking the Supreme Court to consider overturning this as part of the court case, to overturn the Jacob v.
	Massachusetts, Jacobson v.
	Massachusetts. Look, The Supreme Court cases are not law.
	But if they are making law or if they're making precedents or opinions or whatever, they can always change any of this stuff, as we saw with Roe v.
	Wade. So there's nothing that is said in concrete.
	These are just opinions.
	And they're not laws, by the way.
	Petitioners all were employees of Michigan State University when the mandate was announced and they had demonstrable naturally acquired immunity to the virus.
	For this reason, and by the way, you shouldn't have to have a reason.
	I don't need to give you a reason why I don't want to inject something into my body.
	And I don't really care about what your reasons are either.
	But for this reason, they declined to receive these Trump shots, I'll call them.
	Disciplinary proceedings against them commenced and two of the three eventually were terminated.
	A federal court dismissed a previous lawsuit ruling governmental vaccine mandates are subject only to rational basis review, whatever that means.
	And they cited the Jacobson case.
	The 1905 Jacobson decision concerned a smallpox vaccine mandate by the city of Massachusetts.
	The decision articulated the belief that individual liberty must be subordinated to the welfare of the general public.
	See? I absolutely reject that idea.
	And anybody should reject that idea.
	But this isn't just anybody.
	This is the government. This is the Supreme Court we're talking about.
	As well as the collective good of the nation.
	Thus, liberty, in relation to public health, may be subordinate to the power of the state.
	And... A summary from Page University's law school said, it has been used to justify not just vaccine mandates, but forcible sterilization of individuals who have been deemed unfit to reproduce.
	Well, that's actually kind of redundant.
	I mean, the globalists who put this whole thing together have deemed that all of us are unfit to reproduce.
	They don't want us, they don't need us, they think.
	And they'd like to get rid of us.
	They're concerned that we might take away the things that they play with.
	So to keep their toys, they want to kill the rest of us.
	That's really what this is about.
	And there's a huge component of this, besides killing people, the people who survive, many of them are impaired in terms of being able to have children, along with many of the other things that they coerce on us, force on us.
	But understand, this has been used by eugenicists.
	So we're going to forcibly sterilize somebody.
	For the good of society, you know.
	So the NCLA raises the question of whether rational basis review automatically applies to all legal challenges to vaccine mandates.
	They argue that the Supreme Court should look to other more recent rulings and apply what they called heightened scrutiny.
	I don't know what that is. It said it would raise the bar for vaccine mandates.
	Look, it's just real simple. It's either your body and your choice or it isn't.
	And abortion is not your body.
	It's somebody else.
	But these people who are so adamant about abortion are usually the same ones who demand that your body be injected for their good.
	For their good. If government can mandate unwanted medical treatment anytime someone or an intervention is even remotely rational, quote-unquote, There is essentially no limit on governmental powers in this area.
	That's the precedent that they set.
	That's the Trump precedent.
	So they said there could be some long-term benefits to this in any future health crisis.
	Governments must be required to actually follow basic scientific principles rather than political fads if they win.
	So, you know, we'll see what happens with it.
	Governments did not cite Jacobson when adopting regulations.
	Because governments rarely cite their authority to promulgate legislation or rules until they are challenged in court.
	Said one of the people challenging it.
	But in every or almost every lawsuit, Jacobson was relied on and or cited by the deciding court.
	In other words, you have these little petty dictators, unelected, unaccountable, bureaucrats.
	They say, you've got to do this, you've got to do that.
	Simon says, put a mask on your head.
	Simon says, put another cloth mask on your head.
	Simon says, turn around. Keep six feet away from everybody else.
	And they don't cite any authority for that.
	Because they have no authority for that.
	But then when they go to court, they will cite this Jacobson case.
	So these people say, it needs to be heard.
	Now, Neil Gorsuch has criticized the widespread use of Jacobson back in November of 2020.
	Remember, Trump was still president then.
	The Supreme Court enjoined New York from enforcing gathering limits on religious services.
	Gorsuch wrote a concurring opinion in which he criticized the use of Jacobson.
	He said nothing in Jacobson purported to address, let alone approve, such serious and long-lasting intrusions into settled constitutional rights, such as limits or restrictions on people gathering.
	Why have some mistaken this court's modest decision in Jacobson for a towering authority that overshadows the Constitution during a pandemic?
	In the end, I can only surmise that much of the answer lies in particular judicial impulse to stay out of the way in times of crisis.
	But if that impulse may be understandable or even admirable in other circumstances, we may not shelter in place when the Constitution is under attack.
	Things never go well when we do.
	Well, that's true of all of us, not just Supreme Court justices.
	I've got to say that of the three that Trump has put in, none of them are perfect.
	They've all already had bad decisions.
	But he hasn't had nearly as many or as egregiously bad decisions as Amy Coney Barrett did.
	Or Brett Kavanaugh.
	Gorsuch has been much better than them.
	But we'll see what happens.
	The justices always drift left, typically.
	Clarence Thomas hasn't.
	And Samuel Alito, for the most part, has seen.
	And they haven't gotten everything right.
	I'm not defending everything they do.
	I disagree with a lot of their decisions.
	But for the most part, they have gotten it right.
	Wealth over health.
	And this article from the expose...
	Contrast what happened in 1999 with the rotavirus vaccine to what did not happen with the Trump vaccines, these genetic code injections.
	In 1999, there was a decision to withdraw the RotoShield rotavirus vaccine from the market due to an association with an increased risk of a rare but serious bowel obstruction.
	But then, of course, as we all know, it doesn't matter how non-rare these situations are with a Trump shot, you're not going to have anybody ever talk about pulling this stuff out anymore.
	And I talked about it back in the 1970s.
	Nine states banned one of these flu shots when I think it was three or four people died.
	We're way, way beyond that.
	And Croatia, a pathologist has said that there, 65% of the cancer cases got one or more of the Trump shots that are out there.
	A genetic code injection.
	Yeah, that is exactly what we're looking at.
	And when you look at even our food, right?
	90% Of U.S. cheese contains genetically modified organisms from Pfizer.
	From Pfizer, yeah.
	Good morning, America. It's brought to you by Pfizer.
	They're into everything. And of course, why wouldn't they be?
	Because they completely own the FDA Food and Drug Administration.
	So, yeah, let's get into the food business as well.
	We can stick our GMO stuff into cheese.
	Who stole the cheese?
	And get this. What they've put in there, what Pfizer has contributed to U.S. cheese, is a clotting agent.
	Now, they use it to curdle the milk into cheese.
	But, yeah, they came up with a genetically modified clotting agent.
	I think we noticed.
	It's in Trump's shot as well.
	We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues.
	Really? APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APS radio.com
	Music Playing...
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Night Show.
	New World Order in music.
	One, two, three, four, five.
	All the unvaccinated are still alive.
	A little bit of Pfizer in my arm.
	A little bit of BioNTech does no harm.
	A little Johnson Johnson does the trick.
	A little AstraZeneca so you don't get sick.
	It's booster number five.
	Yeah, booster number nine.
	Number nine. And there was some back and forth yesterday.
	It was sent to me by Harry Hound.
	Appreciate the heads up.
	But yeah, this has been going on now for over a week because it really didn't even start with the State of the Union and Trump being so offended that he wasn't given credit for the Pfizer shot.
	It really began a couple of days before that.
	With the State of the Union, Trump spends his Super Tuesday speech complaining that he, quote, never got credit, unquote, for his handling of COVID when over a million people died.
	Way more than that, because it wasn't COVID. It was his hospital rules that were killing most of the people and the neglect as well as the poison that was given to those.
	And then two days later, in response to the State of the Union, of course, his big problem With Biden's State of the Union, his big problem was the fact that Biden didn't give him credit for the poison shot.
	You know, not only did he brag about his democide two days earlier, but that was his big problem with the State of the Union.
	And as I played a couple weeks ago, Catherine Austin Fitz, when she went on with one of these Trump cheerleaders, Greg Hunter, with USA Watchdog.
	She said to him, you know, I'm not going to let you do this about Trump.
	Well, Trump, he was deceived, you know.
	He didn't know what he said. She says, no, you've got to hold people accountable.
	You've got to tell the truth.
	You've got to hold people accountable.
	That is the only way out of this, said Catherine Austin Fitz.
	I am sick to death of these sycophants and cheerleaders.
	And you can watch these people squirm when Trump does something like you did a week ago.
	So, and it's still going on.
	It's still echoing in social media.
	As LifeSite News said about it at the time, it said in January 2023, Trump dismissed potential safety issues by suggesting that the problems were relatively small in number.
	He's in 100% agreement with Fauci, folks.
	He left him in place.
	He put him there. He left him there.
	He gave him a medal on the last day.
	He told his voters who were yelling at him, fire Fauci, fire Fauci, fire Fauci.
	Real like me. We'll see.
	We'll see. He stressed, some people say that I saved 100 million lives worldwide, and some people say you killed almost that many just with your shot.
	At the time, mRNA technology pioneer and prominent COVID establishment critic Dr.
	Robert Malone revealed that he once filmed a video meant to encourage Trump to change his mind on the subject, but it had no impact, he said.
	That June, Trump brushed off an audience member who told him, we've lost people because you supported the jab.
	He said, well, everybody wanted a vaccine at the time.
	I was able to do something that nobody else could have done.
	And, you know, that part of it is true.
	Nobody else could have pulled the wool over the MAGA people's eyes like Trump did.
	They made him into the great opposition of globalism, and then he became the center point of the global agenda, charging us to pay Pfizer and Moderna to create this thing, manufacture it, using the military to ship it around, sold it around the world.
	He repeated that answer in an interview the same month with Fox News' Brett Baer, lamenting that as a Republican, it's not a great thing to talk about because for some reason it's just not, he said.
	Then he stressed that he has no regrets about his administration's overall COVID response.
	He regularly declares his administration deserved more credit on COVID. And then most recently this last week, in response to what he just did on State of the Union and his tweet there, Journalist Ryan Mata said, looks like we don't need to buy any more MAGA gear.
	Trump will be wearing a Pfizer hat at his next rally.
	Another person said, what is wrong with this man?
	Who would say this garbage?
	We all have friends and family and children we know who were murdered by these vaccines.
	And so another one said, Matt Kibbe said, Reminder, almost everything that makes you angry about the authoritarian government response to the so-called pandemic.
	I say so-called. He just called it a pandemic.
	But everything about the government response to the pandemic.
	Started with the Trump administration.
	Biden simply doubled down on the same policies using the same poison, the same injections, the same remdesivir, the same ventilators, the same money program to pay the hospitals to do all this stuff.
	Despite the facts, this is from Bradley Dean of Sons of Liberty.
	He said, despite the facts, the con man that the Mockingbird Media is doing its best to drive back into the People's White House, Donald Trump, the self-proclaimed father of the vaccine, who had the brazen audacity to come out recently and to make false claims concerning the pandemic that he initialed.
	And then he quoted, he just puts the reference to John 8, 44.
	Which says, he was a murderer from the beginning.
	There is no truth in him.
	When he speaks, he speaks his native language.
	For he is a liar and the father of the vaccine.
	I'm sorry, the father of liars, right?
	Yeah, Trump. Daily Mail says between 10 to 20 percent, one doctor says in the Daily Mail, between 10 to 20 percent of my heart attack patients are now under the age of 40, says Dr.
	Martin Lowe, a consultant cardiologist in London.
	In the U.S., he said, data shows about one in five heart attack patients is under 40 and we're catching up in the U.K. When I was a junior doctor, it was extremely rare to see young people.
	Most patients were smokers in their 50s and 60s.
	Young athletes, kids in junior high school, got to have a heart test before, electrocardiograph.
	They got to look at your heart, okay, before you can play sports.
	It's so baffling, isn't it?
	Young people dropping dead of heart attacks and unprecedented, whatever could it be?
	As Vox Populi says, it really is a true puzzler, isn't it?
	Very sticky here. I don't think that even Sherlock Holmes, Hercule Perrault, any of these other detectives could ever discover this.
	Well, you know, I think Hercule Perrault would recognize what's going on.
	Like I said many times, it's like murder on the Orient Express.
	Except it's murder on the Warp Speed Express.
	Seth Hancock says, well, Don, I'll give you the credit you deserve.
	Except I don't call it credit, I call it blame.
	You sold America out to the globalist agenda.
	You are to blame for millions of people dead from your bioweapon.
	Exactly right. And yet, you know, just yesterday, we see this from the New American, the John Burr Society.
	Trump endorses deep stater.
	When will he learn? They correctly diagnose Mike Rogers.
	And they don't cut him any slack for his record.
	They call him out for his bad record.
	But they cut slack for Donald Trump.
	Even the Birchers are doing this.
	What does it matter with these people?
	What does it matter with them?
	Donald Trump recently endorsed Michigan's former Congressman Mike Rogers for the state's open Senate seat, sparking backlash from Rand Paul about Trump's counsel and his ability to avoid the personal pitfalls of his presidency.
	Today we discuss Rogers' intelligence past, his terrible voting record as lawmaker, and Trump's continuing judgment problem.
	Are you kidding me, guys?
	Come on! Let's get real about this stuff.
	Maybe Trump knows what he's doing.
	If he did this the entire four years, his continuing judgment problem, yeah, it continued out through his entire administration, the people he put in his administration, the people he put in charge, the people he listened to, he said, to do a pandemic lockdown.
	It's all of it. All of it.
	And if he's not a tool of these people, he's a fool.
	You need to wake up.
	You've got a judgmental problem.
	If you're going to refuse to hold him accountable, you hold Mike Rogers accountable, but you won't hold Trump accountable?
	Are you kidding me? When will conservatives learn who Trump is?
	Are you afraid of losing your audience?
	You need to tell the truth.
	I've always seen the John Birch Society tell the truth before, and I'm sick of this kind of stuff.
	I'm really sick of it.
	And then we got Bill Mitchell, who I talked about before, who was twisting around trying to maneuver and excuse Trump a week ago.
	And somebody sent a thing to him saying, you know, what is going on with Laura Loomer?
	She's so crazy, lunatic.
	And so this was sent to me by Harry Hound on Twitter.
	Why doesn't Trump distance himself from people like Laura Loomer, who can be toxic at times?
	And so then Bill Mitchell is making excuses for Trump, and now he's going to make excuses for Laura Loomer.
	It never stops. These people want to hang together, don't they?
	Well, you better not criticize Laura Loomer.
	She'd come after you.
	Yeah, you spineless, gutless.
	Yeah, Bill Mitchell. It just looks like Max Headroom, doesn't he?
	Just every time I look at him, I look at the stuttering stuff.
	Anyway, Laura clearly loves...
	So here's his reasons. He said lots of reasons, and he gives five reasons.
	Number one, Laura clearly loves Trump and is very loyal to him.
	So what? So what?
	That's a fault.
	That's not a virtue. You are attached to a person.
	Actually, you're attached to an audience.
	Number two, a lot of the work that Laura does is very good.
	She is toxic occasionally, but her style is to be controversial, and sometimes you get toxic with that.
	Her illegal immigration reporting has been very good and took bravery on her part.
	Well, I haven't seen that. I've seen her chain herself to doors and things like that.
	Just stunts. Stunts.
	I find that to be counterproductive.
	It does get you a lot of attention.
	She's closing in, I think, on a million followers on Twitter.
	So if that's your goal, but if your goal is to inform people, if your goal is to change society for the better, that doesn't help.
	It actually hinders it.
	Number three, Laura is very popular with many in the Trump base.
	And there would be backlash if she's criticized.
	See? Number one and number three.
	She loves Trump, and the base loves Trump, and so we're going to do what the base wants.
	We're not going to tell the truth.
	We're going to tell what works out for us.
	Number four. The people that Laura pisses off with some of her more combative tweets pretty much hate Trump anyway.
	It's always about Trump.
	Trump in the audience. Trump in the audience.
	Trump in the audience. Bill Mitchell.
	And five, Laura plays hardball.
	If you don't like hardball, you really need to get out of politics.
	Well, yeah, but again, if your purpose is to persuade, maybe that's part of the problem.
	Maybe one of the reasons why Trump is such a pariah to so many people.
	Well, I saw that, and I could not help but respond.
	I said, for all the lying, grifting sycophants who cover for each other, like Bill Mitchell covering for Laura Loomer, as they try to hide Trump's pride, his lies, his lockdown pandemic, his shedding of innocent blood with his jabs and his political wars to divide and conquer, there is something far more important Than winning in this sleazy political game.
	I just look at politics and it's just so oily and disgusting.
	It's like opening up a raw sewage.
	Every day I look at it.
	That's why I get really angry sometimes.
	But I quoted Proverbs on the tweet.
	I said there's six things. He's got five reasons to like Laura Loomer, right?
	Well, here are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him.
	Haughty eyes, somebody proud like Trump.
	A lying tongue, like Trump, like some of these people who cover for him.
	Hands that shed innocent blood.
	A heart that devises wicked plans.
	Feet that make haste to run to evil at warp speed.
	A false witness who breathes out lies and one who sows discord amongst even the GOP. Amongst brothers.
	Let alone the country in general.
	This guy is a one-man civil war.
	Everywhere he goes, he mixes it up.
	Whenever I see Trump, I think of...
	You remember, the Beatles were doing stuff before there was MTV or any music videos.
	They did a lot of music videos and stuff.
	Early on, they did this black and white thing.
	I don't remember even which one it was.
	Hard Day's Night or something like that.
	But, you know, they're just these four lads from Liverpool, right?
	But they've got an old man who's an uncle to one of them, if I can remember correctly.
	It's been a long time, but I always think about that.
	And this guy was just always trying to set people against each other.
	They were taking a train trip with him or something like that.
	But he was trying to get everybody on the train, hating everybody else on the train.
	And even the guys in the group, I think, you know, trying to hate each other.
	He's just an old man.
	He likes to just mix it up with everybody.
	He just took delight in that.
	And that's who Trump reminds me of whenever I see him.
	He will sow division and discord and anger.
	Even when there's no reason to, he'll do it.
	Because it always puts him in the catbird seat.
	And now as he gets more and more powerful, what is happening?
	All of his faults are getting magnified.
	And all the faults of the big conservative media are getting magnified as well.
	And then you see somebody like this, and I'm not even going to mention their names because I don't want to give them any publicity.
	But they have focused on being influencers.
	And they said this, they said, influencers that turn on Trump over his positive vaccine comments aren't special.
	You're not special.
	I never said it was special.
	These are two young Hispanic girls.
	And they envision themselves as having a career as influencers.
	You know, that's the thing. You can make a lot of money as an influencer.
	I don't know if you know that or not.
	You have these situations where...
	If they want to sell products, they'll go to somebody that, you know, whatever they're doing, basically they're playing the same game that the BBC did with Big Brother, right?
	You live a life of exhibitionism, and if you're lucky, a lot of people like to watch you And if you get this following, then you can sell them stuff, right?
	It's perverse. It's just perverse.
	But they can make a lot of money if they become an influencer on TikTok or social media of any sort.
	And so they aspire to be influencers.
	What an empty, vapid life that must be.
	Well, they make a lot of money doing it.
	These two are not.
	They've only got about 24,000 followers or something.
	So they're influencer wannabes.
	But they said, you're not special if you don't like his positive vaccine comments.
	If you're a one-issue voter and an anti-vaccine absolutist, then vote for Kennedy, as that's the only thing he's got going on for himself.
	Okay, well, here's my one.
	I'm sorry, they don't have 24. They've got 21,000.
	Oh no, that's how many views they got.
	They had 24,000 followers.
	They got 21,000 views.
	And so these people are being promoted to me.
	They didn't comment on anything that I put there.
	They were not taking issue with me.
	Although they would if they saw what I had there.
	But, you know, you have 24,000 followers and you get 21,000 views?
	I think Elon Musk is featuring them.
	Why? Why?
	Why feature vapid cheerleaders who want to be influencers?
	John Stewart and Stephen Levitsky talking about how the Constitution is a problem.
	This article from Information Liberation.
	John Stewart talking to a Harvard professor, Stephen Levitsky.
	Stewart asks, is the Constitution the document that actually got us into this mess?
	Lovisky said, it's done us a lot of good, but it is part of the problem today.
	And he's upset about the Electoral College.
	But I imagine he's got a lot of grievances with the Constitution if he's from Harvard.
	So he said, we have a Constitution that protects and enables and that empowers an authoritarian minority party.
	And that's a problem.
	A tyranny of the minority?
	You mean like Black Lives Matter?
	Something like that? He says, first of all, it was a document created by people who feared democracy.
	That's about the only thing I agree with him on.
	Yes, they did fear democracy.
	They feared mob rule.
	And so it wasn't that they wanted to put a minority in power.
	It's that they wanted to protect individual rights because we are all a minority of one, aren't we?
	And so we have a democratic republic.
	And actually this idea of saying we're going to have a rule of law, we're going to have people that we have some way of choosing them, but then we're going to delegate that to them.
	I mean, that's really the principle behind having congressmen, having senators and things like that.
	And it's the principle behind the Electoral College.
	They never set up a system where we would directly vote for the president.
	We would vote for people who presumably kind of knew who these other people were.
	And... Would make some kind of judgment about that on their own based on their superior experience that they have that we cannot all have because we're not there.
	Because if you don't have that, then what you wind up with is not just a democracy, but you have demagoguery as well, which is what we are suffering under.
	And so he says, so was this a compromise?
	Stuart says, was this a compromise to those southern states?
	Is that it? You know, those southern states we hate so much.
	He goes, well, to smaller states.
	Because we don't all want to be ruled by New York and LA and Chicago.
	And if we don't have something like the electoral college, as I've mentioned many times, that would be the result of it.
	So, I'm going to take a quick break and we're going to come back.
	Before I do, I want to thank James.
	Thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin.
	Christopher Mincy says, in 2016, my son nearly died from the Rotatech vaccine.
	He had an aneurysm.
	I'm sorry. I'm glad that he didn't die.
	But, yeah, they don't...
	And I've contrasted this.
	You know, you can contrast it, the COVID vaccine, to some of these other dangerous vaccines or things like that.
	But look at the difference.
	Between the way they treat some of these products and the preferential treatment and just ignoring it when it comes to these pharmaceutical drugs.
	On Rockfin, Gordon Schwamwe says, Well, Vladimir Putin, I have a question for you.
	If you're so anti-globalist agenda, why have you developed a Sputnik V vaccine that is becoming the most popular globally?
	I don't think he is again.
	That's another one of these things, right?
	Look, you know, we're supposed to believe that You know, you got NATO and, you know, the U.S. on this side.
	And on the other side, you got Russia and China.
	China has been the playpen for the globalists since the 1970s in Kissinger, the opening up to China.
	What did they do immediately? They started doing their population control.
	And in response, we shut down our industry and continued to move it there.
	You know, first, with preferential tariffs, allowing them to use...
	Copyright theft, slave labor, currency manipulation in order to drive our businesses out of business.
	Now they're just shutting down our energy supply while they still allow China to have that.
	So China is part of the globalist agenda.
	It's not us against China.
	This is the Hegelian dialectic so that they can destroy everything and build their new world.
	And Russia is the same way.
	I don't cheer Putin at all.
	As a matter of fact, I've played clips of Putin, you know, before they set him up as the professional wrestling heel.
	They had him going around and singing, I found my thrill on Blueberry Hill, and all the stars really loved it.
	He was their guy.
	I mean, he was almost as good as, you know, the rapist Kevin Spacey.
	But we'll be right back.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APS radio.com Using free speech to free minds Oh, man.
	you It's the David Knight Show.
	Some more bumpers with some jazz stuff in it.
	I've got to say this.
	Coming up on Sunday is the 50th anniversary of our first date.
	And Karen and I, as I've mentioned this before, our first date was on St.
	Patrick's Day and I went with a couple of other guys I've been in bands with and there was a guy that we knew that had been my junior high school band director and And he was a really good musician.
	He played bassoon in the symphony orchestra, which I think makes you a nervous wreck if you play one of those things.
	It's like an oboe, right? The old joke, what's the difference between an oboe and an onion?
	Nobody cries when you chop up an oboe.
	You certainly do fret the entire time.
	It's like, is this thing going to work this time?
	But he played clarinet with a Dixieland jazz band.
	And so we all went there for our first date.
	And that will be 50 years this Sunday.
	So anyway, let's talk a little bit about artificial intelligence.
	A company called Physical Intelligence is building a brain for robots.
	This is from Bloomberg.
	This is another one of these, you know, gee whiz articles.
	Most of them are, by the way.
	Robots can build cars in factories.
	They can clean up after us at home.
	Yeah, well, we've got a Roomba-like thing, and I get so frustrated with it.
	And we got that because we got a bunch of dogs, and so we got lots of hair issues all the time.
	So I was like, we need to have something.
	I'm going to constantly do this stuff.
	Well, you get it, and there's a clump of hair that just fell off a scout.
	It's sitting there. And this thing will, you know, dance around it.
	No, just go right there.
	Just get fed up with it.
	So I go get the vacuum cleaner, and I vacuum it up.
	So, so much for cleaning up after us at home.
	But they're able to carry out a relatively small range of tasks compared to the increasingly general nature of chatbots, they said.
	Yeah, the chatbots are so great.
	Just wait until you give these things arms and legs and they start hallucinating.
	It's going to be real interesting, isn't it?
	A startup called Physical Intelligence has set out to alter the situation, formed this year by a team of robotics and AI experts.
	The company plans to create software that can add high-level intelligence to a wide variety of robots and machines.
	We aim to bring AI to the physical world with a universal model that can power any robot or any physical device, basically, for any application.
	Except, you know, they're really behind.
	There's a lot of people who are out there ahead of them.
	As a matter of fact, this is a company called Figure, and they have cut a deal with OpenAI, and they've started manufacturing robots.
	OpenAI is kind of the brain for it.
	And it can be a little bit, you'll notice when I play this video for you, and it's back and forth, a couple of things are really amazing to me.
	Number one, you know, for years, like I said, we'll go up in Florida, only about 50 minutes away from Disney World.
	So we would go there frequently.
	It was free admission in the early days anyway.
	But we go on these rides or see these other things, and you know, you've seen the animatronic stuff, and you know how stiff and jerky.
	This is very fluid movement.
	Very agile. And it's not just, you know, running through pre-programmed movements and everything.
	But it is a little bit slow.
	It does hesitate. And then it talks.
	And as it's doing things, and you'll notice that they even put like a little stutter in there.
	Or they put like some California affectations to me.
	Oh yeah, sure. Yeah, watch this.
	You'll notice this when you watch it.
	The little hesitations that it has to think about something for a moment before it does it.
	That's going to go away with Moore's Law.
	All they need is, you know, this continually faster and faster hardware.
	That's an incremental thing that's been going on now for decades.
	So that's going to... Moore's Law is going to take care of the pause.
	The key thing is that it can do the right action here.
	So here's a little demo.
	No eyes, just a black face.
	Hey, figure one, what do you see right now?
	Pauses. I see a red apple on a plate in the center of the table, a drying rack with cups and a plate, and you standing nearby with your hand on the table.
	Great. Can I have something to eat?
	So you've got a little bit of a raspy voice.
	Sure thing. Sure thing, yeah.
	California. Great.
	Can you explain why you did what you just did while you pick up this trash?
	on it. So I gave you the app on it because it's the only edible item I could provide you with from the table.
	Great, so based on the scene right now, where do you think the dishes in front of you go next?
	You're next.
	you you The dishes on the table, like that plate and cup, are likely to go into the drying rack next.
	Great, can you put them there?
	Of course!
	Alright, so how do you think you did?
	did.
	you you I think I did pretty well.
	The Apple found its new owner, the trash is gone, and the tableware is right where it belongs.
	I agree. Thanks, Figure One.
	You're welcome. If there's anything else you need help with, just let me know.
	Yeah, so you notice that he's got the little affectations.
	Well, yeah, I think I did pretty good, you know, and he's got the little raspy voice and everything.
	Now, here's another picture of it walking and picking up a container and putting it on a conveyor belt.
	At this point, it is tethered, but, of course, we have seen that with Boston Dynamics.
	It's going to escape the tether pretty soon.
	Humanoid robot maker figure has announced a new deal with ChatGPT.
	The company recently closed a $675 million round of funding.
	That's about how much Trump got to buy all of his casinos to bail him out, and he, you know, at a 14% interest rate.
	I don't think they're that stupid.
	But anyway, a $2.6 billion valuation resulted.
	Notable backers include Amazon founder Bezos, Microsoft and AI chip maker NVIDIA. So he's able to walk, as you see there, pick up plastic crate, able to put it on a nearby conveyor belt.
	The CEO last month also had a video of this thing making coffee.
	He called it groundbreaking.
	And he said it learned all the steps to making coffee in one go.
	Figure is far from alone in the space.
	As I point out, there's another company that is going to do that, hasn't done it.
	Tesla has also got its Optimus robot, which looks very much like this, not a black face, right?
	Designed to be capable of performing tasks that are unsafe, repetitive, or boring.
	Says Musk. Agility Robots is also looking at opening up a factory full of robots.
	So they're focused on having a bunch of robots under control simultaneously within a factory.
	Sam Altman.
	Again, this is the robot robot.
	The company figure that is connected to OpenAI, which Sam Altman has taken over.
	It was going to be an open source AI thing.
	Now he's turned it over into his particular thing.
	And so he did an interview, and they asked him, is AI a tool or a creature?
	Well, he said, There's still risks with tools, of course, but they're of a different shape and a different kind of profile.
	And I think the popular misconception of AI as sci-fi is very, very different from people who've been using it as a tool for a long time.
	And by the way, I think it's great that what we're building is like a tool, because if you give humans better tools, they do these amazing things to surprise you on the upside, and that builds all this new value for all of us.
	Well, this tech magazine is not convinced.
	They said, let's be real though.
	It's a convenient narrative at the moment, but more and more concerned about whether open AI and the greater AI industry are poised to replace jobs.
	The idea of AI as a tool that can help people do their jobs better, like a personal computer, It is much less scary than the idea of AI as an autonomous entity that can do your job instead of you.
	Instead of you.
	And then, of course, the connections to the government, the military-industrial complex.
	That's the key thing as well.
	And even beyond that physical aspect, as I pointed out yesterday, when you look at the potential for abuse in terms of speech and narrative and censorship and propaganda and all the rest of this stuff, its ability to censor, its ability to surveil us, its ability to propagandize us, All this stuff is truly frightening.
	And that's just the ChatGPT stuff.
	You don't even have to give it arms and legs.
	So then the other company, Agility, is creating an army of humanoid robots.
	And this is the company.
	If you find that, Travis, pull it up and show the picture of the robot.
	I've shown this robot walking around the factory before.
	This is the one that has kind of like the insect legs that bend backwards.
	And I always thought it was really interesting.
	When it first came out and I saw that, it's like, whoa.
	And I played the clip from the Charlie Sheen sci-fi movie, The Arrival.
	And in that, you had these aliens that would...
	You know, be able to put on flesh and appear to be humans.
	But then when they wanted to do something like run really fast or jump or whatever, they would kind of pause and their knees would bend backwards.
	And, you know, that's how they identified them as aliens.
	I thought it was kind of interesting.
	That's a movie from 1996.
	I thought that's kind of interesting that here we are.
	You know, two or three decades later, how did they know that this was going to be a very effective way for these robotics companies to have their factory workers' legs operate?
	Isn't that interesting? There it is.
	You see that? It's a little bit hard to see because the lower part of the leg is chrome.
	But that's what they look like.
	And that one, they've got two lights on the head, and they make those lights blink.
	You know, again, these little touches to make it, to anthropomorphize it, right?
	Make it feel a little bit human.
	They said, I think we're the first humanoid robot vendor to have a solution in the factory front.
	Agility envisions ultimately very large deployments into the hundreds.
	And of course, the purpose of that is strictly to take jobs.
	Everybody's concerned about the immigrants.
	The immigrants are here for friction.
	The immigrants are here for divide and conquer.
	The immigrants are not here to take your job.
	The robots are here to take your job.
	And they've arrived with agility, with figure.
	So they're going to take your job while they have the humans fighting amongst ourselves because there's different languages and different cultures and all the rest of the stuff.
	And it truly is a diabolical plot.
	How do we get out of this?
	Well, first of all, one of the ways that we stop this division Is we have to stop their narrative of trying to divide people.
	How do you unite people?
	Well, the only way I know of, of uniting really disparate people, people that are very, very different from each other, the only way I know of doing that is through the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.
	And I'm serious about that.
	Don't just say, oh, no, it really does.
	We've seen this over and over again.
	When people realize that we're all created in the image of God, and we're different from animals, we're different from machines.
	Because we're created by God, and because we're created by God, we have individual rights.
	That is the essence. That's what that lady with Politico was focused on.
	She tried to say that's a hallmark of Christian nationalism.
	Well, it is a common belief.
	It was a common belief for the people who founded this country.
	It helped to unite people.
	So we need to be looking at ways that we can get past that.
	We need to understand that divisions between people are based on borders.
	They're based on different languages.
	They're based on culture.
	But they're not based on things like skin color.
	God didn't make different races.
	There's one race, the human race.
	And he's made us all of one blood.
	And if we don't understand that, we will be fighting.
	And we'll be easily pitted against each other by the politicians.
	So you got Yuval Harari, again, speaking up.
	And this guy is definitely not about humanity.
	He is one of the, like I said, always whenever I see him, I get encouraged.
	Because when I see rabid atheists like Yuval Harari, and he knows very well.
	Yeah, he's Jewish.
	He knows the Hebrew language.
	He knows Genesis. He knows what he's fighting against.
	He actively opposes it.
	And so he goes on with Stephen Colbert, who says, do we need to teach our young people anything now that AI is here?
	I mean, can't we all just sit here and let it do everything for us?
	Do we need to learn anything?
	That's what I was talking about at the end of the show yesterday, this AI nihilism, right?
	The idea, well...
	I'm not going to bother to learn how to do this because the next rev of chat GPT or whatever it is is going to be able to do it for me.
	So I'll just wait. I don't really have to learn how to do...
	I don't have to learn how to code.
	I don't learn how to build things.
	I don't need to learn how to fix things.
	I don't need to know any music or art.
	I don't need to know how to do video editing.
	I'll just have the thing do it for me.
	You know, the thing. It'll do it.
	That is one of the most dangerous aspects of this.
	The pacification of people.
	Literally turning us into Eloy, as imagined by H.G. Wells and his time machine.
	Turning us into helpless little things on the shelf who do nothing but set back to be waited on.
	And that's what Stephen Colbert would like to have.
	And so he says, Colbert went on to say, well, I'm not worried about A.I., And he said, man has been really terrible at governing and controlling ourselves.
	He said, Colbert said, I'm ready for the big machines that make big decisions programmed by fellows with compassion and vision.
	They always sell you a dystopia by selling you a utopia, don't they?
	And he's such a disgusting show, isn't he?
	This is what he was doing to poison people.
	Now he's pushing AI. I'll have the opposite of what that guy is having.
	Anyway, Harari said, well, not really.
	He said, it is extremely dangerous to give up power to something that we don't yet understand.
	Then Colbert argues with him.
	He says, no, AI is no different than us, and the two are quite alike because we made them.
	Rory was still a bit tepid about fully embracing AI as the new god.
	He said, well, the one thing to know about AI, the most important thing to know about AI, it's the first technology in history that can make decisions by itself, can create new ideas by itself.
	People compare it to the printing press, to the atom bomb, know it's completely different.
	Does it really, does it really, Yuval?
	Does it really create new ideas by itself?
	Yesterday we had a new release, for example, of that program Sora, the artificial intelligence program, that came up with some really amazing stuff.
	Yeah, there were some minor flaws in it, but it was really pretty good when they showed it a few months ago.
	So they came up with like another 10 videos or something.
	And then the woman who is the CEO for this thing, Had an interview, and she was asked, where did you get this information for these videos?
	Oh, I'm sorry. Here is the actual...
	She was mocked about that a lot.
	But here's where she's talking about...
	I'll explain this picture here in a moment.
	Here's where she talks about training it.
	What data was used to train Sora?
	We used publicly available data and licensed data.
	So, videos on YouTube?
	I'm actually not sure about that.
	Okay. Videos from Facebook?
	Instagram? You know, if they were publicly available to use, there might be the data, but I'm not sure.
	I'm not confident about it.
	What about Shutterstock?
	I know you guys have a deal with them.
	I'm just not going to go into the details of the data that was used, but it was publicly available or licensed data.
	Oh, wow. And that's why this face that I put up there, you know, she's, you know, kind of grimaces.
	Oh, I don't know. Because, again, it's not creating new ideas by itself.
	It's not creating new stuff.
	It is combining other stuff, and it is combining things that people have done.
	Did you scrape this off of YouTube?
	Did you scrape it off of Facebook and Instagram?
	Did you get it off of Shutterstock, you know, licensed stuff that you might have paid them for because the other stuff, you're just ripping it off.
	I'm not going to say. You notice that she didn't say, well, it thinks on its own.
	It creates its own ideas.
	She didn't say that. She had ample opportunity to say that, but she knows that it's not doing that.
	And because it doesn't do that, as I said before, because AI is, depending on us, on humans, for its existence, once it gets to the point where it starts consuming the product of other AI... Then it really starts to get bad.
	Because then it gets kind of like a mad cow disease.
	You know, when cows eat other cows, they get mad cow disease.
	When humans cannibalize other humans, they get Yakov Kreutzfeld, I think is the way it's pronounced.
	They get that. Well, you know, AI gets that as well.
	Winepress says, this is the same Harari who has claimed that AI has made a lot of people redundant and are now part of a useless class society.
	He's also said that AI should and will be used to rewrite a new Bible.
	He would like to rewrite a new Bible.
	He would like to create a new God.
	He would like to be God, right?
	And he thinks that people are useless.
	That's why I said before, we have to understand that nobody is useless.
	Everybody's got a different kind of intelligence.
	Some people have an intelligence where they can do artistic things or they can write.
	Other people may not be able to express ideas at all or speak, but they're mechanical geniuses.
	They can fix anything. They can take it apart and put it back together again.
	That's a different kind of intelligence.
	There's so many different kinds of intelligence.
	And there's so many variations and combinations of those types of intelligence with people.
	It's one of the reasons why, again, we have to go back to the idea that people are created in the image of God.
	There's something unique about each and every one of us.
	That's the argument that we have against abortion.
	That's the argument we have against artificial intelligence.
	It's the argument we have against euthanasia, everything in between.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we have a very special guest who's going to be joining us again, a Navy SEAL, and we're going to talk to him about his perspective on what is happening at the border, what is happening in Ukraine, and many other issues.
	So stay with us.
	We will be right back.
	Whether you're feeling like the blues...
	APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you All right, welcome back, and joining us now is Drago, and as his Navy SEAL name, very interesting background.
	I've had him on before.
	We talked about his book, Pledge to America.
	He came to this country from Poland, and today we're going to talk about some other issues besides his background story, but his background story is truly amazing, how he came to America, how he volunteered to So joining us now is Drago.
	Thank you for joining us, sir. David, thank you for inviting me.
	A lot of things have happened since you've been on.
	I would like to get your take on, you know, what are the key issues in front of us right now when we look at something, for example, like Ukraine?
	How are you looking at this war now?
	We've got so many people have said, well, just let me get your take on it.
	What is your take on what's going on with Ukraine?
	Well, first, our administration needs to stop lying to us.
	Russians are not losing the war.
	It's ridiculous. Ridiculing Russian forces is totally misplaced now.
	It is the worst propaganda.
	That is outright stupid.
	You know, we have generals, our generals, repeating stories like that the Russians don't know that they are in the war, in combat.
	They think that the command told them that they are going on exercise, and they are on exercise.
	You know what? This is being repeated by not only generals, but our Yes, from the left and right.
	That's absolutely not true.
	And Russians know very well what they are and what they are doing.
	It is pretty deliberate. They're not trying to take over, at this time, entire Ukraine.
	They just want to secure their interest.
	But we need to understand that...
	Putin is not some kind of rogue, idiot, and somebody who doesn't know what he's doing.
	Yeah, that's our guy. Please remember this.
	That's our guy who doesn't know what he's doing.
	An idiot. So, yeah, I'm sorry.
	Go ahead. You know, I wouldn't tell our guys, but you know, it seems like they know what they do.
	They just lie to us.
	And basically, they ruin Ukraine with the stupid advices or stupid moves up there.
	Please remember, Putin almost single-handedly rebuilt the Russian Empire.
	He is supported by 80% of his population.
	And also, what we are not being told, or we are ignored, is that Russia is no longer a communist empire.
	They have the same oligarchs like we have here, like we have Romney, like we have John Kerry.
	That's not different.
	So... That war did not have to happen, and President Trump is absolutely right.
	But when we start talking about Ukraine membership in NATO, of course Russians don't want to have NATO directly on their borders, so that was one of the accelerators to the war.
	And then, please remember, there was an agreement signed between Ukraine and Russia, and then Great Britain, that idiot, what's his name?
	Fojo. Boris Johnson, yeah.
	Yeah, so that buzzer went in and cancelled everything for Ukraine and Russia.
	So now we are in war.
	But again, Russians are not losing.
	Please remember that...
	Ukrainians lost over 400,000 people in combat.
	A small nation, this is not really something that you can ignore.
	That's right. And so now, today, the average age of Ukrainian soldier is between 4 and 50 years old.
	You see, I went to the region quite a few times, and I had a chance to spoke to my Ukrainian friends, I had a chance to speak to my Ukrainian friends, Polish friends, Germans, French...
	And the consensus, people who are there, who understand what's going on, is we are in the wrong place and wrong time.
	Oh, I absolutely agree.
	I agree. At the very beginning of this, you talked about how many Ukrainian casualties they had.
	I remember at the very beginning of this, there was some Indian generals who were talking about the military aspects of it.
	And they weren't on either side, really.
	They were just kind of third-party observers.
	They said, it looks like the plan is to fight them until the last Ukrainian.
	And that appears to be the plan.
	They're using these people as surrogates.
	We had Chris Christie when he was running.
	He said, well, I think that's fine.
	You know, look at how much we've cost the Russians.
	I think we need to double down and do even more of this stuff.
	I mean, it's like they have absolutely no regard for human life.
	They have absolutely no concern about a broader, escalated war.
	And I think... This administration, with their advisors and with their ideas, ruined Ukraine.
	Please remember, the Soviet Union is no longer a socialist state.
	They kicked out communism to the curb a long time ago.
	Now, the large contribution to this is coming from President Putin.
	He basically made Russians free again.
	Yes, there will be always 5 to 15% of society, just like in our society, that will oppose and they will revolt and they will not agree with what I'm saying.
	But in general, he's supported by almost or over 80% of his population.
	And you can see it. Russians love their country.
	What we must also remember, which is very important, and I think what...
	It is very important that Russians are very patriotic.
	Yes. Their idea in their society is Russia first.
	Well, here you try to say America first, you see what happened.
	This is how it works.
	And this is why we are just trying to bring NATO into this conflict now.
	Now, I think it's totally ridiculous.
	Seems like this administration is gunning for the war, for the major, wider war.
	Sending troops to Ukraine right now is basically fighting by our regular units, fighting Russians.
	And this will lead to escalations and it will lead to major war.
	Not only in Europe, but we might have fights attacked on our own soil.
	So we need to understand that.
	And again, Russians don't hate their country.
	Yeah, yeah. This is something Biden administration doesn't want people to know.
	That's right. Another thing about this conflict is Food control, food supplies.
	Please remember that Russia, I mean Ukraine, is known as a bread basket of Europe.
	These fertile grounds can feed entire Europe and still with so much surplus that is being sent to Africa.
	So I'll look it up some of the statistics here.
	And most of these lands are no longer owned by Ukrainians.
	They're owned by Western entities.
	So somebody is veying for control of the food supplies in Europe.
	So let's take a look here.
	The Cornell Company, registered in Luxembourg, owns 360,000 hectares, not acres, hectares.
	The company is owned by 90% by oligarch, I think his name, and other US banks and funds.
	Euchre land farming.
	No one knows who owns it, but there is almost 670,000 acres.
	Nobody knows really who owns it because all financial data and servers were destroyed.
	MHP, Cyprus company with 340,000 hectares.
	TNA corporate, U.S. company with 200,000 hectares.
	NCH company, U.S. company with 200,000 hectares.
	PIF, Saudi Arabia.
	Astrata, Holland, from Holland.
	So, most of the majority of profit does not go to Kiev.
	It goes, it's being transferred overseas.
	And if Ukraine would join Western, would come in closer ties with Western countries, those lands would be controlled, not by Ukrainians, but would be controlled by whoever is trying to gain control of food supply.
	Food supplies for Europe.
	But you can just see how this structure...
	Ukrainians don't own it anymore.
	Most of it is owned by overseas and profit goes overseas.
	Again, we are...
	President Biden, I was listening to his disastrous State of Union, and he says we need to send more money to Ukraine.
	That's only imbecile can say, because not understanding that Ukraine needs not so much money as people to fight the war.
	Yeah. I guess, like I said earlier, The average age of Ukrainian soldiers is between 40 and 50 years old.
	They don't have enough. They are actually snatching people over the street and pulling them in the army.
	Kids, old people.
	So the average between 50 and 60.
	So think who is the medium.
	What's the oldest people right now snatched into the army and serving?
	So the equipment, even if they get it, they don't have people to operate this unless this is Western entities that comes in there.
	And hopefully they're not the regular forces because it will escalate.
	Putin is not bluffing.
	We are. We have nothing to back us up.
	We cannot sustain prolonged expanded deployment to Europe.
	We can barely sustain what we have now.
	And now, please remember, too, that our recruitment is down.
	It is not only army that was so widely publicized, but it's also in the Navy and Air Force, in Marines.
	So now we have one side with very patriotic pro their country, people like Russians, who will not back down.
	And then we have here people who refuse to fight for our country because they were told in universities and schools that we are racist.
	We are bad. We shouldn't exist.
	And the division which was created recently within the last Four, eight, ten years, dividing us again between black and white and between this, between that.
	You know what? I remember when I joined the Navy, the first thing that we were told is that we all have one color.
	It is red, white, and blue.
	Yes. We don't look at each other in black, white, yellow, pink.
	We're just red, white, and blue.
	This is the color of our hearts.
	And we have only one country.
	So now, think about it, how I don't think as very strong as very strong now because we have in our Congress We have people who have no loyalty or double loyalty.
	They have loyalty to America and Somalia or other countries.
	Why do we have people with dual citizenship in our government?
	Yes, that's right. We need to ask ourselves.
	And you look at what is happening at West Point.
	I talked about this yesterday. They want to get rid of duty, honor, and country.
	And it's like, what's wrong with those three things, right?
	We're going to replace it with army values.
	And one of the things that they say, and that is, well, even more as much as the duty on our country is the fact that the original pledge or what motto, whatever it was, but it was a paragraph that they had the cadets memorize.
	And in it, they were saying, service to our country in the army, and through the army or whatever.
	Now it is service to the army and to our country, whatever.
	So it's more focused on this bureaucratic institution than it is on serving the country.
	To me, that is as significant as the fact that you'd remove duty, honor, and country.
	I mean, which of those words, or is it all three, that they object to?
	I'm not really sure. There's a trend.
	I think everybody can see it now.
	That's right. All the universities and even the academies, yeah.
	Remove any national cohesions.
	Remove any patriotic feelings.
	Basically, I think the ultimate goal is just what happened in Europe, and I'll just come back to it in a second, to get rid of the citizenship, rid of...
	That's right. So we will not be Americans living in America.
	We will be just the dwellers living in America.
	And when I had a conversation with a German friend, so when we talked, I said, well, so you Germans, it's like, don't say, don't call us Germans.
	This is offensive.
	I'm European. I'm a member of the European Union.
	German is a right-wing propaganda in a right-wing term, so you must not call me a German.
	I'm offended. So, yeah, don't you see the direction of what is going here?
	Pretty much the same thing.
	So this administration is disastrous.
	I would like to say, because it really bothers me.
	When I look at my country, my America, I see that never in the history of civilization has a nation declined more economically, politically, socially, militarily, immorally, and globally over such a short span of time as the United States of America signs Biden to go.
	I mean, think what is happening.
	We have perverts in our schools.
	Pole dancing to our kids and reading them books in schools and libraries.
	Perverts. Pornographic books.
	And if you speak out against it, you are the extremist.
	Exactly. We have a man masquerading as women We're frequenting our daughters' wives' bathrooms.
	You know, people who rides on the zebra doesn't make it a horse.
	You can put wig and lipstick on yourself.
	You are still a man.
	You still have X... There are differences between XX and XY chromosomes.
	You can't transmute one into another.
	So you're either a man or a woman.
	You cannot. There is no such thing like transitioning.
	You don't transition to anything.
	You just wear the wig and lipstick.
	That's it. That's right.
	We want us to believe that you are a woman.
	You know, it becomes so perverted and so sick that nowadays, young generations, boy, at least I teach my son, before you start dating a girl...
	You need to ask, have you always been a girl?
	Because people may find out that that is not the case, and you just ruin your life.
	So, if somebody wants to...
	See, I fought for this right.
	If a man wants to go and wear the dress, lipstick, and wig...
	Call himself a woman.
	More power to him.
	I don't really care, you know.
	But start harassing my kids in the bathroom.
	Then when we start pushing the mutilation on our children and the surgeries, the sex change and life-altering surgeries, That's evil.
	That's pure evil. And it is interesting.
	I just talked about it yesterday.
	The suicide rates double after what they call their vaginoplasty and everything.
	And that was part of the rationale for taking away parental rights.
	And, you know, the parental rights attack...
	It has been there for a very long time.
	It was nearly 20 years ago.
	I was doing videos for the Children's Health Defense Organization as a spinoff called ParentalRights.org.
	And they were trying to get in a constitutional amendment for parental rights because the U.N. had a convention on the rights of the child, and every other country on Earth had signed on to it, except for the United States.
	But in the United States, it was being pushed through with activist judges and at some local political levels.
	Bust them at the time.
	That didn't happen, but now it is happening.
	You know, that has been there cooking under the surface, and they've been kind of subtly preparing things, and now all of a sudden, boom, it bursts onto the scene in a very rapid expansion, and it's been there for quite some time.
	They've been talking about, you know, all this, even going back before the rhetoric of Hillary Clinton in It Takes a Village, they've been working for decades on undermining parental rights because they wanted to get straight to the kids.
	It is one step at a time.
	But you see, what happened, the whole process accelerated because these goons, that cabal was exposed by President Trump.
	They don't have much time.
	People are waking up. So they need to do as much damage as possible, the damage they may not be able to undo.
	And again, this is not...
	Democrats versus Republicans and vice versa.
	This is good versus evil.
	We have plenty of evil in both parties.
	For example, Murkowski, Rumney, Liz Cheney, that dude swallow well, sleeping with Chinese spies with the prostitutes.
	Yeah. And he's still in our government.
	So we have a...
	For me, he's as good as a spy, you know?
	So Swallow Bell, who sleeps with Chinese spies, prostitutes.
	We have a Schumer. We have a jihadist in our Congress, like Omar and Clive.
	We cannot move forward to fix our country until as long as we tolerate evil.
	And those are evil people.
	There's more of them. I agree.
	Before we get any further, I want to talk to you about the border and things like that, but before we leave Europe and Ukraine, you know, we've looked at this, and from the very beginning, I was saying it, Gerald Salenti, who's a regular on the program, was saying, you're not going to beat Russia.
	I mean, We're good to go.
	But, you know, is it your judgment that this is a deliberate setup, a deliberate provocation?
	Because three years before this began, you had an interview with him.
	And, of course, this all really kind of goes back to the coup in 2014.
	But, you know, Zelensky ran on a platform of peace.
	And he had a guy, I don't know if you're familiar with him, Alexander Arrestovich.
	And he was eventually kicked out because one of these bombs that hit an apartment building, he said, well, he told the truth.
	He said, no, it was hit by some of our...
	Anti-aircraft stuff.
	And then it veered into the building.
	It wasn't necessarily a target of this thing.
	And so they fired him. But he was also very candid three years in advance.
	He was their guy they sent to the peace process.
	And he came back and did an interview with Ukrainian television.
	And she said, what's the prospect for peace?
	He said, none. Oh, that's terrible.
	He goes, oh, it gets worse.
	We're going to have a full-on war with Russia in three years, in 2022.
	And she said, that's horrible.
	And he goes... Yeah, the whole country is going to be devastated, but he goes, the good part of it is we get into NATO. It seems to me, looking at it, I'd like to get your take on it.
	It seems to me like this was a long-term plan that they had.
	And what do you think? Is there a plan to continue to escalate this so they can have a direct war with Russia?
	Do they really want a world war?
	What do you think? I don't think there was a plan at the time, the time you mentioned, to start a war with Russia.
	I think there was just a try to bring Ukraine into NATO, and they knew that Russia will oppose, so they just tried to backdoor to different ways.
	Basically, our administration and Western Europe instigate This entire affair.
	They wanted to bring and they were hoping they can blow off and they can scare Russia and they can bring Ukraine in.
	They wanted to happen. Russia went and took it what they believed.
	Please see now. I mean they are in state of war.
	Ukraine is not going to join NATO. It's not going to join the NATO unless we start the full-scale war with Russia.
	And Russia is no longer that That backwards communist state, it used to be.
	We will be fighting very modern, well-equipped Russia, and we are not prepared.
	Look at our forces. Now, they are more concerned with the perverts in the military.
	They are more concerned with pronouns than with our fighting force.
	I mean, we are disintegrating.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. And that officer, the space cadet, who was saying, you know, we've got to get our pronouns right just a couple of weeks ago.
	It truly is ludicrous.
	And yet, you know, they talk about the domino theory.
	And yet, if you're the Russian people, you're the Russians, you look at all these different countries that are coming in and joining NATO. And, you know, they're adding more.
	They haven't done Ukraine yet.
	You know, they've added, what was it, Finland and Sweden and things like that.
	You look at it and it's like, well, that looks like a domino theory.
	It looks like somebody is on the move and somebody is getting aggressive and it's like, what is even the message, the meaning of NATO before all this stuff began?
	I mean, is there really, why did they need to even continue NATO and why are they expanding NATO so rapidly?
	What do you think? I don't think NATO may survive this escalation here.
	Not necessarily even the war.
	Because what I suspect what is going to happen, the Russians just get tired.
	They still try to make, they try to negotiate.
	That's true. They still try to make it somehow amicable.
	Well, it's not going to happen under this administration.
	So, Russia will finally say they will get tired.
	They will just take what they need to take.
	We are bluffing. We will not be able to do anything up there.
	So, I think we are in a very bad spot.
	But please remember, this is the same cabal.
	I'm talking about this administration.
	This is the same cabal that gave us Benghazi.
	Oh yeah. They murdered our ambassador.
	They killed two of my teammates.
	This is the same cabal that fled Afghanistan.
	They fled in such a hurry, they left thousands of our and allied citizens in Taliban hands.
	This is the same cabal trying to manage Ukraine.
	It's a joke.
	Think about who is running our country.
	We have a mentally impaired man who is being led and guided by his wife because he cannot make up the stage.
	You think he's making any shots?
	Exactly. It's not fun to laugh at our president.
	But it is quite sad that this elder with serious mental deficiency is being abused by his nefarious wife and his handlers.
	Those who enable it, they should be prosecuted for elder abuse.
	This man doesn't belong in the White House.
	He belongs in the In some care facility for elderly people now.
	This is how bad it is.
	So, you know, it's just...
	I think we need a change.
	We need a real leadership in our country.
	We need to go back to our values.
	Patriotism is not...
	There's nothing wrong with being patriotic American, but we are being now portrayed As the right-wing crazies, you know, if you are pro-America, if you call yourself proud American citizen, you are being called crazy and right-wing extremists.
	I mean, think about parents demanding real education for kids.
	I'm being branded by the FBI as criminals.
	You know, as weaponization of our state entities.
	That's not different than the country I escaped from.
	This is the same thing.
	They will intimidate, they will raid your families, your home.
	Because you are inconvenient politically to the state, to the system.
	I mean, we need to wake up because we are going the same path that Russia went in 1917, the Bolshevik Revolution.
	I agree. So we are in a dangerous path.
	We should worry less about Ukraine and more about our southern border because It's just crazy.
	Yeah, let's talk about that.
	Let's talk about the border.
	I'll just say this. You know, it's kind of like a lot of these things.
	Sometimes there is a silver lining.
	You know, we had all the schools locked down and kids were doing Zoom class and everything.
	Finally, we got a chance for parents to actually see what was going on in their classroom.
	I've had that conversation with people for 30 years and telling them what's happening.
	Oh, but that's not in our school.
	You know what I mean? They could believe that it was coming out of the federal government.
	They could believe that it was even a state government or that school board or whatever, maybe even in the same school.
	But I got a good teacher in my classroom.
	Well, the Zoom stuff, they could finally see that.
	And the thing about Biden, I guess, a silver lining for Biden, is people can look at Biden and they can understand the president's not the one who's running the show.
	There's somebody behind him.
	Who are these people really?
	Who is the shadow government?
	That's really running the show here, you know, because it certainly isn't Joe Biden.
	So that's the only possibly good thing that comes out of this is to kind of dispel that idea from people that he's the one in charge.
	There is a cabal, like you pointed out, and it's the same people that gave us Benghazi and the disaster in Afghanistan and all these other things.
	In Mexico? Sorry?
	This disaster in Ukraine is not only a disaster for us and Western Europe, it's a disaster for Ukraine and even more.
	Because I don't know if this nation will be able to rebuild itself after what this administration did to it.
	Yes, yes. And again, that's another part of it.
	You know, when I look at something like this, and you could look at the fact that you've got all of these big corporations that are mysteriously operating, as you pointed out.
	We don't even know who has the second largest holding there.
	But, you know, so what is their goal?
	Is it just really to get monopoly pricing on this stuff?
	And yet, if that really was their goal...
	Why are they having this war on this farmland there, especially when you have the possibility of having cluster bombs or you have depleted uranium, which pollutes the land forever, basically?
	Why would you destroy it?
	It seems to me like there's also an aspect of trying to destroy that farmland.
	And it seems to me like a lot of these globalist cabals want to, just as they do in the Netherlands, they want to destroy the farms.
	They want to take them by, you know, putting the farmers off the land.
	They want to, you know, consolidate everybody into little cities and control the food distribution, all the rest.
	Perhaps that's, what do you think, a motivation for what's going on in Ukraine as well, do you think?
	Well, it's not only in Ukraine, it's in our country too, in America, in Western Europe, and in Ukraine too.
	Ukraine is the most important part for them because the entire fertile lands in Western Europe do not match the Ukrainian fertile lands.
	The biggest, I think, food supply for entire Europe and Africa.
	So, yeah, they want to take control of it.
	I don't know why they're ruining, destroying it or just having control of it, but this is not good.
	And this is the same thing is happening in our country, too.
	You can see Chinese people, I mean, Chinese citizens buying our lands, farm lands, as also our oligarchs, too.
	So... And destruction of food infrastructure, just as we saw in Texas, you know, and all these other things happening.
	And so much of that stuff is happening.
	You have to ask yourself, is this a coincidence or is this a plan?
	Because they really do want to control our food supply and they want us buying their lab food that they are going to take control of and deliver to us as they see fit to do it.
	I think that's a big part of it.
	But let's talk about what's going on at the border.
	Why isn't it That you've got all these people, and I get very frustrated.
	I hear the Republicans talking about it, but they don't build a wall.
	They don't finish the wall. And then even when we look at what is happening in Texas, it is one city, Eagle Pass.
	They've got a big presence there, but you just go not even a mile away from it.
	Many reporters have gone, and there's nothing there, and there's wide open areas where anybody can come in.
	So there's a lot of theater that's going on with all this stuff.
	What do you think it's going to take to get this done?
	Get control of the board. Well, before we think about what can be done, let's just try to think, ask the questions why it is being done.
	I believe that ballot staffing may not work this time.
	The COVID virus may not work this time for Democrats.
	Or for the cabal behind it, for voter fraud may not work.
	So the borders were open to the hordes.
	The new scheme is to count non-citizen, I call them Biden's invaders, for congressional seats and electoral votes.
	Democrats are also working to give Biden's invaders voting rights.
	They count them as part of the census and then do the allocation for that.
	And so if they bring them into these particular states, then all of a sudden they can inflate the number of congressmen coming from that state.
	And they can pack the Congress.
	That's one way to do it. They always want to do it.
	FDR wanted to pack the Supreme Court.
	These people talked about packing the Supreme Court.
	Well, they can pack the Congress as well, and they can use foreign citizens here illegally to do that.
	Yes. And again, as I have seen in the communist country I escaped from, once socialists run the country, once they have established fraudulent elections, You will continue to have fraudulent elections because state entities will be, like they are here now, being weaponized, targeting political opponents.
	We see what is happening to President Trump right now.
	I mean, in my opinion, there is a bimbo, a prostitute, who doesn't even remember when she was assaulted and how it happened.
	And she won, what, millions of dollars A lawsuit.
	There's not a criminal case. But she wanted money?
	For what?
	She doesn't even remember what happened.
	But this is how perverted it become eventually.
	And this is just the beginning of starting the socialist way of thinking.
	Yeah, I think everybody sees that it is a selective prosecution on these cases, that it is politicized, that they have committed, in many cases, committed the same crimes, and there's not anything brought against them.
	So we understand this is a specialized, it's not even really a prosecution, it's a persecution.
	They've taken the blindfold off of Lady Justice and they're using laser focus to come after somebody that they believe is their political enemy. But that is happening to a lot of people and there's so many different areas where this is happening, especially in speech and censorship.
	You're seeing people now in Europe being sent to prison, in Canada they've got a bill to send people perhaps even to life in prison because of speech issues.
	And to do it before they say anything.
	Do it in a pre-crime way.
	I mean, it truly is amazing.
	There's so many different...
	It's like shock and awe when I look at it.
	You know, hitting us with everything all at once, everywhere, to take away every foundation of the Bill of Rights and everything else that Western civilization has had and built over millennia.
	See, the Socialist Democratic Party right now is turning our country into something I escaped from.
	And you can talk, if you listen to immigrants who escape the totalitarian socialist countries, they are alarmed.
	I mean, on my account on LinkedIn, which is heavily censored, of course, or Facebook.
	I have people calling me and messaging me that they are scared because this is what they experience in former communist countries.
	Because, you know, the goal, I think, is not to make America...
	Communist state. But please remember that socialism and communism are excellent tools to control society, so why not to implement?
	I mean, it will not succeed on the long run, and it takes decades, but it takes decades to free yourself from the yoke of communism and socialism, if even possible.
	Because if the technology that exists today It existed in the 1980s and 70s when I lived in a communist country.
	These countries would stay communists.
	People would not be...
	And I think that's their plan.
	I think if they're looking at...
	If you look at Strauss and Howell, people on this show, I talk about a great deal.
	The people who coined the term millennial or Gen Z and all this, everybody uses those terms but they don't talk about the big picture that they were talking about, which is every four generations you have the institutions are completely changed.
	It's almost always, well it is always massive economic change and it is usually accompanied with war.
	And then you wind up with a society that whether it's good or bad, the change, you usually wind up with that for about 70 years.
	I think these people are expecting, you know, we're in that time right now.
	We're in the middle of a fourth generation where everything is turning.
	I think they believe that if they win this, they're going to be able to hold on to it longer than that with the tools that they've got.
	And as you point out, the people who have lived in it, they're sounding the alarm right Rod Dreher wrote a book a few years ago saying, live not by lies, which he quoted from Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
	He said, the reason I wrote this book is because I had friends whose parents They escaped communism and they were freaking out.
	And they said, we're seeing exactly the same stuff we lived under.
	I talked to Xi Van Fleet, who got out of China.
	She grew up in China and she said, all the same stuff that's being done in the schools now, she goes, it's not woke, it's Marxism.
	Yeah.
	Yeah. Yeah,
	absolutely. You see, when I wrote my book, my intention was to showcase America as the most beautiful, powerful, unique, exceptional country, a free country.
	So now, I wanted this book to be used as a prism, to see America this way, through the prism of socialism and communism, how oppressive socialism really is.
	But now when people read it, I get also a lot of messages saying, hey, what you describe in your book, isn't something that's happening here in our country now?
	Yeah. Yes, it is.
	This is what really disturbs me.
	It really sometimes scares me, too.
	So, again, we are not socialist, communist yet.
	We just need to make sure we don't become one.
	And this is why the processes are accelerating, because there is a man who exposes All these shenigans.
	And they may not have much time because once people see what it really is, nobody will follow it.
	Even now, you know, the majority of our people do not support that socialist oppression, do not support communism.
	But we are being told by the manipulative fake news media That majority of people would like to have that socialist state, which is absolutely not true.
	But the same thing happened in communist Poland, where there's maybe 10% of people, hardcore communists, like my father.
	But the rest people love and hate communism and socialism.
	But when you read the fake news media in Poland, the communist times behind Iron Curtain, you would think that the majority of Poles are loving that socialism and communism, because this is the way the propaganda works.
	This is why censorship is so important to...
	Oh, yeah. We saw that a lot in 2020.
	You know, there were a lot of us, at least a third of us, who didn't want the mask, didn't want the lockdown, weren't afraid of the so-called pandemic and all the rest of the stuff.
	But we were led to believe that we were alone, because it would cover up our stories, and they would amplify the other side of this.
	And so this has always been the case.
	And I'm sure, especially when you grew up in communist Poland, I know in Russia...
	They used to have two papers.
	They had Asvestia and Pravda, and one of them meant news, the other one meant truth, and they said there's no truth in Pravda, there's no news in Asvestia.
	The people were not really fooled by it, but they felt helpless, and they really couldn't do anything about it, and that's what Solzhenitsyn would talk about.
	In your experience, you're growing up, and you're a young person in Poland.
	Your dad is a communist.
	What was it that gave you the courage to go against this grain rather than just going along?
	You see, I'm saying my father was a high-ranking communist in Poland, in Polish government.
	But I really didn't have much contact with him until I was 16 years old because of the poverty.
	I had to be sent either to orphanage or to live with my father.
	And eventually, father agreed to take me in.
	I lasted only one year before he kicked me out.
	But by this time, my...
	Ideals were shaped by my mother, by my mother's family.
	And so when I went up there, the first question I asked him, so if everybody loves socialism so much, which I don't see among my friends, but that's my father.
	But what about those people who do not support socialism and communism?
	What about them? Well, the answer was very quick and simple.
	We need to eliminate them.
	So, and the way we say, how?
	Well, the first, we're gonna ban them.
	We're gonna cancel them.
	We're gonna remove them from society, basically, intellectually.
	So it happened, you know, the statues were removed that did not support socialist ideology.
	The books were removed from libraries and banned.
	But I say, well, okay, but what if they still don't like socialism?
	Well, that is the final solution.
	Then we're not just physically exterminate them, because they are in the way of progress to socialism and communism.
	They are such a great state. So that was his ideas, my father's ideas, that, you know, you try to convince them, but if they don't buy it, you arrest them, cancel them, put them in jails, and eventually that doesn't help.
	You just kill them. Yeah.
	And that's what we're seeing now with the speech stuff.
	You know, we've been shadow banned.
	We were overtly banned.
	And then now, you know, they are publicly humiliated.
	Now they want to start putting people in jail.
	And they are putting people in jail.
	Sorry? We have political prisoners today.
	These people sitting in the Democrats' dungeons in Washington, D.C. are just political prisoners like I was in communist state.
	Please remember one thing.
	It is so...
	I mean, I don't know even how they sold it to people.
	Governments cannot be overthrown by people waving hands and flags.
	They tried to tell us that there was a coup attempt to overthrow our government.
	By who? People waving flags?
	Yes. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
	There was absolutely – there was no way they were going to – I told people, I said, don't go as a trap because there's nothing you can do.
	You know, they're not going to show up with weapons and have a shootout, and they didn't show up with weapons, and yet now they're gone to prison because they construed it as if they had shown up with weapons or something.
	And it's the power of the press to be able to spin a media, and it is this government that we have that is absolutely unashamed to openly violate the Constitution or the rule of law.
	Absolutely. Let me tell you this.
	President Trump, by questioning election results, didn't commit any crime.
	Most people in our country now question these results.
	81 million people for mentally deficient men who never even campaigned.
	I don't buy it.
	I don't believe it. For me, these elections in 2020 had all the hallmarks of socialist election.
	Socialist election, this term, is not very well understood here.
	It's not very common, but it's very well understood in former communist countries.
	Socialist elections are the elections where communists and Marxists always win.
	Those are what we call socialist elections.
	And these elections 2020 had all the hallmarks of socialist elections.
	Questioning and challenging the results of elections is not a crime.
	It is only crime in communist countries or Nazi, fascist countries and countries run by communists like my father.
	So that Saying that we have an insurrection is a hoax, is another hoax, and is a nonsense.
	I've seen insurrections.
	I've been, I live in Poland when Czechoslovakia in 1968 happened.
	That was tongues and guns being used.
	People with flags waving hands, with American flags and waving hands, cannot overthrow our government.
	It's a hoax.
	Yeah, and they very carefully controlled the videos that they released to make it, you know, who did the first shoving, you know, because that's what it's fistfights and stuff like that.
	So who shoved first? And they controlled that completely.
	Portland or other cities, when Democrats unleashed their terror groups, like Antifa, Black Lives Matter, on our society, they burned entire cities, they murdered people.
	This is what we're talking about, the riots.
	But there was not even a riot.
	People, if you look at the videos, the recently released videos, you can see police guiding people around the Capitol.
	People sitting walking there, yeah, some misbehaved.
	But you know what? That will always happen.
	Also remember that this crowd was infiltrated by state entities who did instigate it.
	What I believe failed on January 6th, the biggest failure was Democrats being unable to instigate widespread mayhem and violence.
	And that didn't happen, so that kind of put off a lot of their ideas, what they want to do.
	And it's interesting that they're also conservative.
	I think it's interesting that they're escalating the arrests now, because they just come after a reporter for The Blaze, who was there as a reporter.
	I mean, clearly he's, you know, but of course, if you don't have the right, if you don't have part of the First Amendment to assemble and redress your grievances, you don't have the right to report either, right?
	So they're coming after him.
	They just arrested him, took him off in handcuffs.
	One of the people that I used to work with, Sam Montoya, they arrested him, and he was doing journalist work.
	You know, he was there, and he didn't push or shove anybody.
	We've seen three guys that I talked about, two elderly guys, and one of them was the son of one of the two guys.
	They're in their early 70s.
	They just walked up to the police and said, can I use the restroom?
	They said, yeah, it's right around here.
	They're charging them. I want to give them a five-year jail sentence.
	It is absolutely absurd.
	And I guess, here's my question for you.
	What do you think is really behind all this?
	Because everybody sees the absurdity of this.
	Are they doing this to provoke?
	Are they doing this in election year to provoke?
	There is a small, loyal base to them that eats all this stuff up, just accepts it, whatever the mainstream media says to them.
	But for most people, I think they look at this and they say, this is really over the top as we're talking about.
	Do they want to do that?
	Is this another provocation trying to provoke something?
	What do you think? I don't believe so, but I think they are not afraid of it.
	Their goal is to terrorize the society into submission.
	I know this from my experience in communist politics.
	State and communist country behind the Iron Curtain.
	It starts big, of course.
	So now we have President Trump being attacked by this administration.
	Now we have citizens being attacked, more prominent citizens.
	But please remember, once they are done with them, the next is Ewing line.
	So if...
	For right now, I can say whatever I want to say, but pretty soon, for what I'm saying now, I might be looking over my shoulder because of the way socialism works.
	Tell me about it.
	Yeah, I know. Yeah, exactly.
	Socialism is socialism.
	Whether it is Hitler socialism, national socialism, Joseph Stalin socialism, Polish at the time socialism.
	My father and communists in Poland called it Polish socialism and democratic socialism.
	And we know how many thousands of people are dead just in Poland.
	I'm not talking about other Democratic socialist countries in Eastern Europe.
	So socialism is socialism, and they all have many things in common, like censorship, persecution of political opponents, political prisoners, and even kill political assassination, killing more inconvenient people to the state.
	So we need to be careful.
	I see a lot of enumeration in our younger generation with socialism.
	They try to differentiate.
	Well, socialism is not the communism.
	Well, it's not as bad yet, but it's the stepping stone to socialism.
	This was taught in our schools in Poland and in Eastern Europe.
	That socialism is a stepping stone to communism.
	Society needs to be prepared to accept the values, the moral values of communism so that socialism allows this gradual transition into full communism.
	God help us. I agree.
	Yeah, whenever they sell a socialism, it's always a common thing, is always the superiority of the collective to the individual, the superiority of the state.
	And we saw that in spades throughout 2020.
	Your health doesn't matter.
	You're going to do what we say to say, you've got to take a vaccine so you can save everybody else, all that type of stuff.
	So that is a key part of it.
	But I think... The solution for this stuff is books like yours, you know, The Pledge to America, where you talk about, you have a very compelling story, your experience with the Navy SEALs, and it gives people an opportunity to, and you're growing up in a communist country, and people can look at that and say, wow, that looks like what they're doing here.
	Just like, you know, all the different testimonies that we see of people who escaped communism, they know what it was like, they can smell it a mile away, and they're warning us, and people need to see these compelling personal stories about how people have escaped this.
	I think it's very important. And I've got—let me get your comment on this, Drago— This last week, I think we had a victory of some sort in Ireland.
	You had the progressives.
	They thought they had everybody on the run.
	They were able to modify the Constitution, get abortion put in there, or at least stop the prohibition of abortion in the Constitution.
	So then they came back and they decided that they were going to essentially attack motherhood and the family, redefine all that in the Constitution, and they got slapped down overwhelmingly about just under 70% on one of the issues and almost three-quarters on the other issue. People didn't want to have it, and I think that's one of the key things. I think that's a key thing in your story, because as you point out, you know, your mother was the influence on you.
	And we've lost the importance.
	And that's one of the things that was in the Irish Constitution.
	The important function of a mother.
	The important function of a family.
	To shape a society where people have a good life.
	And I think that was the situation with you, tell me if I'm mistaken.
	But it was, you know, we used to talk about the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.
	And so in these socialist countries, in this country, you know, Biden wants to give free, you know, preschool care.
	They want to raise your kids and they're going to pay for it.
	We need to take that responsibility away from the state and we need to reassert the importance of the family, the importance of the mother.
	And I think that's the key thing.
	It's why I ask you, you know, what was it that turned you around?
	And it seems like it was your mother, those who were close to you.
	You weren't close to your father, the communist, but it was you were close to those who had a different take on this.
	What do you think? Is that really what we need to focus on, building the family and building those relationships?
	What do you think? You see what turned me around?
	I think this is a good lesson for everybody here too.
	The power of socialist state and the control they have over our children that we need to take it back here.
	But what happened to me is when I said something in my fifth grade, it was about the Russian language.
	I didn't want to learn Russian language.
	I was not the best student in the class.
	For me, the additional Russian language was just another homework I had to do at home.
	So, I just piped up at school, openly to teachers, why do they teach us Russian language, the oppressor of Poland.
	This is the way Poles understood and they've seen Russian in time.
	That was like, I didn't think much of it, but immediately the teacher woke up to me, grabbed me by my ear.
	Those are methods that all schools, I guess in Poland are the words, pull me by the ear out of the class to the school principal.
	And, uh, they call police, uh, they call police.
	So the police before came to school, they went, my mother was a teacher in different school.
	They pick her up, they detain her, uh, and they handcuff her.
	They brought her to my school.
	They sat us down, and there was two, I think, two uniformed officers and two secret police officers, and they interrogated us, and then they made it pretty clear that if this incident like this repeats itself, if I'm speaking up, About socialism in not positive manner.
	I will be removed from my mom and placed in orphanage, the government orphanage, that I will be taught properly.
	So that was one of the things that made me think and of course scared my mother.
	And then the other experiences within my family when I stayed, went and destroyed my uncle's business because He was working too hard and was competing with government businesses and with the businesses owned by communist cronies.
	So they not only destroyed his business, they almost killed him.
	So this is who told me how to listen to Radio Free Europe, Radio Voice of America.
	And this is where I started learning about the real Polish history because it was so falsified.
	Please remember after the Second World War, when Communists were brought on Russian bayonets to Poland, we had...
	The statues were removed that were not aligned with socialism.
	The books were removed from libraries.
	And I didn't know about it.
	I learned about it later on.
	And that's what people need to understand.
	To understand how parallel all that stuff is.
	Again, the book is The Pledge to America.
	Thank you so much for joining us, Drago.
	And pronounce your last name there.
	People probably won't be able to spell it.
	But if they get D-R-A-G-O and The Pledge to America, they'll be able to find that book, right?
	They'll be able to find us.
	And we've got your website's been up there the entire time, so people will be able to find your website as well.
	Thank you so much for joining us.
	Thank you so much for speaking out and trying to educate people so that we don't have to replicate what other people have learned the hard way.
	You know, that's the one thing they say.
	The experience is an expensive school, but it's the only one a fool will attend.
	Let's hope that our society is not so foolish that we have to go through this experience before we learn the lesson that people who've grown up in communist or socialist countries learned.
	Thank you so much for joining us, Drago.
	Appreciate it. Thank you for your service.
	Appreciate it. Thank you.
	Thank you for inviting me. Thank you.
	Have a good day. Have a good weekend, everybody.
	Thank you for joining us. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲