Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 4, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:20

The David Knight Show - 03/04/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You
	As the clock strikes 13 it's Monday, the 4th of March, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at what they're doing in terms of coming after our food, in many different ways, of course, in the same way they come after our transportation.
	So we're going to begin with updates over these essential things.
	Then we're going to talk about the horse race.
	And I hope that by the time we're finished today, some people will have a greater sense of urgency about this futility we call an election that is soaking up all the news cycle between the Supreme Court case ruling that's going to be released today about 10 o'clock About Trump being on the ballot and all of the trials and tribulations he has in court and Super Tuesday tomorrow, all they're going to be talking about is the election.
	We need to focus on the real issues here.
	So let's begin with that.
	And I don't know why the music cut off, but that's okay.
	Anyway, I hope we don't have some technical problems with this.
	Let's begin with food.
	And this is not related to climate.
	But it's related to the disruption that is happening around the world.
	And that is a crunch in chocolate.
	So much so, and I haven't talked about the fact that it's into record prices here.
	So much so that they're looking at record prices.
	And one of the world's largest chocolatiers in Switzerland is cutting 19% of its workforce.
	So no chocolate or chocolate only at luxury prices.
	Well, there's going to be a lot of other things that are going to be cut as well.
	They're cutting 2,500 jobs as well as a cost reduction strategy in response to the worsening cocoa shortage in West Africa, where most of it comes from.
	It's about reducing complexity, eliminating duplication, said the CEO. And prices in London have hit a record high for cocoa, the raw material.
	But we have bigger issues.
	Soon there will be no farms.
	And this is Dr.
	Vernon Cole out of the UK. And while I'm talking about this, I'm going to show you a video of, I guess you could say we're at the excrement hits the fan stage here.
	Where the farmer protests.
	This is in France.
	And this is a truck, a big tanker truck there.
	See, he's blowing the horn. There's a whole bunch of trucks behind him and tractors.
	And these are tractors, actually, pulling a big tanker.
	You see that stuff that's pouring out of there?
	Yeah, that's excrement there.
	And the police are standing there in a line.
	They don't want him to pass.
	So it looks like he's turning around, doesn't it?
	Well, not exactly.
	He's going to back up.
	This guy is an expert driver.
	And these farmers know what they're doing, quite frankly.
	And so he backs this up close to them, and then he starts rotating it.
	And as he rotates it, this jet coming out of the side of the tanker of septic is hitting the cops big time.
	He's spraying them big time.
	And as he pulls back out, you'll see some of the other...
	But he's just spraying everything right there.
	Yeah, it is...
	And look at the tractors there.
	Well, soon there will be no farms if these people get their way.
	We'll just have police and the excrement in the street.
	But... Sometimes these people, and then they bring out an MRAP, which is white.
	And I guess it took one look at that spray of excrement and decided it wanted to get out of there and have no part.
	Because, I mean, they just must have just watched this thing.
	It's so sparkling white. They're a mine-resistant armored personnel carrier for their SWAT teams.
	Isn't it great how we spread American culture around the world?
	Militarized police everywhere.
	And, of course, this is a global agenda, and it is coming here.
	And it's already going throughout Europe.
	It's just a matter of when it hits here.
	There's a different kind of chocolate crunch, isn't it?
	My son says the chocolate crunch.
	It sounds like an ad for a nutty chocolate bar.
	Yeah, that's right. So these people have...
	This is not chocolate, by the way, that he's spreading.
	Okay, let's get to the article.
	The innocent and the naive, says Dr.
	Vernon Cole. Believe that everything is happening by accident.
	The vindictive, the senseless, cruel, destructive, insane, bureaucratic, dangerous, and just plain bewildering government policies on farming are not happening by accident.
	And I would say as we look at these massive fires about food plants, isn't it interesting that it just seems to be a coincidence that all these big fires are happening at food processing places?
	And then we have what is now the second largest fire in American history.
	May become the biggest.
	I don't know that they've got it under control or not.
	But it is the second biggest one up in the panhandle of Texas.
	And as I played for you on Friday, affecting the meat industry.
	Cattle ranchers. How many of them are going to be able to survive after this?
	They've lost cattle.
	They've lost range.
	What are they going to do to stay in business?
	And that was the reason I played that for you.
	It was not just because of that, but because there's a solution there.
	As a guy in that video said, you know, look, we're going to try to put a network together to help connect Local farm producers with people who want to shop locally with the farmers and cut out the middleman.
	And yeah, it's not just about the expense of the grocery stores and all of that type of thing.
	And a tremendous amount of that is the packaging and the preservatives and all the marketing of it.
	Just getting it straight at the farm.
	But it's also cutting out the government.
	The government is the ultimate middleman.
	And they don't produce anything.
	Except dictates and shortages.
	And so they're far more of a boogeyman than a grocery store.
	I mean, a grocery store is providing a service there.
	Putting it into one spot for one spot shopping.
	I remember at one point in time, somebody was talking about the way they used to accompany their mother in the UK when they go do their grocery shopping in the mid-20th century.
	And they'd go to one place, they'd go to the butcher, they'd go to the baker, they'd go to, you know, all these different things.
	Then the supermarket came, put them all out of business.
	This has been the pattern that we've seen over and over again.
	It does provide a service, but it also makes us dependent upon Wall Street.
	But ultimately, it's the government that provides no service whatsoever.
	But basically shuts everything down.
	And they're doing their best to shut down our food.
	Without any reason whatsoever.
	They deserve what that truck driver was giving them.
	But he says, farmers around the world seem constantly bewildered and confused by policies and decisions which are designed to please the enthusiasts, calling for the closure of farms in order to appease the psychopaths who are calling for net zero.
	And it is psychopathic.
	It is at least sociopathic.
	It is insane. It truly is.
	In an article in the British magazine, he says that it's fallen for the green myth, like a teenager in love.
	One leading green academic recently said, quote, farming has no option.
	It will have to be sustainable.
	Otherwise, it will not be sustained.
	So here's the problem.
	These people who talk about sustainability, are Biden's policies sustainable?
	If we follow his industrial central planning for transportation, for food, for everything else, is that sustainable?
	No, it's not even designed to be sustainable.
	It's designed to take us down.
	And these grand policies are designed to give them an excuse to take us down.
	The dollar is not sustainable.
	This government is not sustainable.
	And so we need to think about that, look for other solutions outside of that.
	And then he talks about the rewilding program.
	Now, the rewilding program is something I've talked about for a long time.
	It's over 50 years ago.
	My uncle, who is a forestry professor at the University of Missouri in Columbia, As a matter of fact, he's head of the program there.
	And he was talking about what was essentially rewilding at the time.
	Don't touch anything in the forest.
	Just leave it when it falls. And, of course, we know that creates massive amounts of fuels, disasters that burn down the forest, burn down the surrounding, private property as well.
	But now they are taking this everywhere.
	They're taking this rewilding stuff into the cities, into the parks inside the cities, and that type of thing.
	No, we were put here to till the ground.
	We're put here to do stewardship and management.
	And the force does require management.
	And so he said the conspirators' plan with all this rewilding stuff is just to take the land away and shut the farms down.
	And he says even parks are now being allowed to grow wild.
	And when you look at what the plans are, there was...
	Biden has a plan not to have farms.
	We don't want farms. We want solar farms.
	Let them eat Chinese solar panels.
	This is arrogance.
	And so they want to get rid of farms.
	They want to put out an equivalent to three or four of mid-sized states in terms of an area that they want to take over and ruin for solar farms.
	And I mean ruin it. And so that is what their plan is.
	Take away the farms for food, and then put out solar collectors.
	We were doing just fine before all this stuff happened, and there is no problem with the climate.
	We'll talk about that coming up later.
	But you understand... That they really do want to take away the food in the same way they want to take away internal combustion engines, the same way they want to take away anything that uses fuel to generate power.
	Today, he says, most farmers see their problems occurring as a result of stupidity, ignorance, or failure to understand their needs.
	But what is happening to them has nothing to do with stupidity, ignorance, or failure to understand.
	This is all deliberate and cold-blooded.
	More and more European countries are now dependent upon imports for most of their food and energy supplies.
	And most of our food will be made in factories owned by billionaires.
	And many of these people, he doesn't say this, this is Dr.
	Vernon Cole, many of these people cannot see the depopulation for the trees.
	They're so close to the details of this.
	And, you know, it's interesting to see this because the farmers are not being joined in these protests for the most part by people who need to be able to eat food.
	They don't see the connection in what's happening.
	And as he points out, the farmers just think, well, this is bullheaded.
	It's going to be destructive.
	They've got to understand this problem.
	No, they understand what they're doing.
	In the same way that the schools are designed to do what they're doing.
	People say, look at these schools are completely dysfunctional.
	Johnny can't read, write, or do arithmetic, right?
	Well, that was the design.
	You go back to the 1980s and Charlotte Iserby, the deliberate dumbing down of America.
	And it was a design to have them become little re-education camps for the Marxists who run our society.
	This is always the design.
	They're working perfectly well, unfortunately.
	Because that's what they were designed to do.
	These policies are designed to put farmers out of business so they can feed us their soil and green, made by Bill Gates and others.
	And so we had an update.
	We thought... With the Amish farmer Amos Miller up in Pennsylvania, he had a court date, but the judge has not issued a decision yet.
	They thought he was going to issue a decision on Friday.
	They had a hearing back on February 29th on Thursday.
	But he hasn't ruled yet, so we don't really know what's going to happen.
	One of the things the judge says, why don't you just get a raw milk permit?
	He goes, I guarantee you, kind of jokingly says, I guarantee you that if you file a raw milk permit, I will see to it that your permit goes to the top of the list and is considered right away.
	Let's just make this whole thing go away.
	He doesn't want to interject himself into this food fight.
	Well, Amos Miller knows exactly what he's doing.
	He says, if I were to get a permit for raw milk, then I would not be able to sell raw butter or any of these other products that are based on raw milk.
	I would only be able to sell raw milk.
	But again, it goes below that level.
	Why do we need to have a permit from the government to grow food or to produce food?
	And you can say, well, a health permit, I think the marketplace takes care of that, quite frankly.
	How did we survive without food inspectors?
	Word of mouth.
	And people going to an extreme move to try to convince everybody that their stuff was pure and clean.
	That's what that is about.
	And that is far more effective.
	Yeah, nothing is perfect, right?
	Something will slip through the cracks of that system as well.
	But it does slip through the cracks of the FDA. And they can come in and overreact to something, or they can be easily bought off by people that they are friends with.
	It's crony capitalism.
	This regulatory capture on a grand scale.
	We see this with food and drugs.
	The FDA, one of the worst agencies in terms of corruption and collusion with the industries that they're supposed to regulate, the drug industries, the food industries.
	And so there's a better way to do this.
	There's no perfect solutions to anything.
	But that would be a better way to do it.
	Miller has argued that he doesn't sell his products to the public, only to the farm's private membership association.
	And that exempts him from having to comply with government regulations.
	You see, if we go this route, then they'll be able to come, if we accept this, that even if it is private, it's not sold in general to the public, if we accept what they're trying to push on Amos Miller, they'll be able to come on any of our property.
	And shut down anything that we're doing, even if it's just for ourselves.
	Even if we don't have a club.
	If we just, you know, got cows for milk, they'll be able to come in and take it down.
	And then they will virtue signal, convinced that they're doing the right thing because they're getting rid of these cows that produce greenhouse gases.
	Yet at the same time, if we look at the state of global fertility, right?
	The rate at which the population replaces itself.
	And it is amazing to see how globally this has dropped.
	In the 1960s, the average global fertility rate, on average, each woman would have 5.3 kids in a family.
	So that's more than enough.
	The population is growing.
	And then what happened shortly after 1963?
	Paul Ehrlich and his Population Bomb, an appropriate title, Because what he was doing was trying to kill people.
	It was a population bomb.
	Now, he was fretting about the fact we have too many people and we need to reduce the population and all the rest.
	Oh, we're all going to starve. Well, that didn't happen.
	Didn't happen. He's one of these Malthusians who was saying, you know, we're going to be out of copper.
	We're going to be out of this or that.
	And, you know, you've seen the stories where people have taken the bet.
	He said, I bet you. You take a basket of these minerals and, you know, these commodities, and let's see where the price is in a few years.
	You say they're all disappearing, there's going to be massive shortages, and there's not.
	Because as long as there's freedom for people to produce what there is an incentive for, it doesn't happen.
	But after the population bomb, this is when all this environmentalism began.
	The one-child policy in China, which was pushed on China by the globalists, they accepted that.
	They became the beta test site for globalism.
	And they have pushed it with food.
	They have pushed it with drugs.
	They have pushed it with education and entertainment and news and everything else.
	So it's a psychological as well as a physiological attack.
	And so we see that it was at 5.3, the fertility rate, in 1963.
	By 1992, it had dropped to 3.0.
	And you need to have 2.0 or greater, just a little bit over 2.0 in order to maintain your population.
	And then in 2021, it dropped to 2.3.
	And so we're right at the point where we can't even maintain the global population.
	But it's even more interesting when you look at what has happened.
	All over the West and in developed countries is where they've had a radical decline.
	And so it's really only in sub-Saharan Africa and one or two places in Central Asia.
	Where there is a sufficient growth of population, where it is 4.0 or higher, or 3.0 or higher, I should say.
	In South Korea, for example, they are one of the only few places in the world with a fertility rate that is below one.
	Below one. Well, that means that it's going to more than cut in half with every subsequent generation.
	You've got to have a little bit more than two.
	If you're at one, that means that your population is going to be cut in half each generation.
	And it's going to be more than cut in half.
	In Japan, a 5% decline in births to a record low of 758,000.
	The birth rate remained at 1.26.
	On the other hand, when you look at sub-Saharan Africa, Niger had a fertility rate of 6.8 in 2021.
	highest in the world, followed by Somalia, Chad, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
	Out of 33 countries in the world where women had four or more children on average, 31 of those 33 were in Africa.
	On average, women in 1963 were having 5.3 children in their lifetime.
	By 2021, that had more than been cut in half to 2.3.
	Again, it's food, it's drugs, it's education, entertainment, media, all of it pushing at that.
	And then we look at the other aspect.
	You know, one thing that is essential to keeping us locked up in these stacked and packed smart cities that they've got, just like we were talking about.
	Last week in China, converting one of these overbuilt, useless commercial real estate properties into a 15-minute city where people would not leave.
	And one of the things that's necessary for this is to make everybody welfare recipients.
	When you start to create dependency, this is one of the reasons why the welfare state, as well as the warfare, welfare and warfare, the lifeblood of the state.
	Yes, we've always known that war is the lifeblood of the state, but welfare is as well, because welfare generates dependencies.
	One of the reasons why they always want to get rid of the car, for example, a private car, and provide some sort of public transportation.
	Where there's one of these light rail, monorail schemes in all the little towns.
	Even in Raleigh, they were trying to push that.
	Talked about that many times.
	Before the Soviet Union fell, you had this leftist city councilor.
	Goes to Russia. Hey, people can drive all around Moscow.
	Go all around Moscow for only a nickel.
	I haven't seen that kind of naive insanity before.
	Since then, until Tucker Carlson went to a subway system in Moscow.
	Just unbelievable. Anyway, I said, yeah, it only cost them everything.
	It didn't cost them a nickel.
	It cost them all their freedom.
	They can't afford anything else.
	And even if you could afford a car, who would want to buy a lot of little ridiculous things?
	But they want everybody dependent on them.
	They want to provide your health care, your transportation, your food, your housing, all of this stuff needs to be provided by them because then they have total control over you, just like Stalin did, just like Mao did.
	And so they are now escalating, it's metastasizing very rapidly, this universal basic income scheme.
	And I found it very interesting that in all these schemes, they take out the word universal.
	It was always UBI. But now they just say basic income.
	Basic income. No universal.
	This is for everybody. Now they're talking about, in this particular case, they're doing the rollouts of these, the test cases of these.
	They are doing an income test, and so they're only giving it to poor people.
	And because they have finite resources, they give it to, it's allocated by a lottery.
	Now, these, as George Gilder pointed out, these people who are pushing universal basic income, and remember in 2020 when Andrew Yang ran, primarily that was his single issue.
	Universal basic income at the time, and now he's moved on to a lot of other progressive, centralized Marxist plans.
	But at that time, it was really all about universal basic income, and Elon Musk gave him millions of dollars because he was on board with this.
	George Gilder in his book, Life After Google, said these people in Silicon Valley, people like Elon Musk, are neo-Marxists.
	Musk is not a friend to conservatives, folks.
	He's playing conservatives just like Trump did and is.
	Both of them playing conservatives.
	They want a strongman billionaire.
	So he'll pretend to be that for them.
	Musk made all of his money.
	Working with governments. Working with the most authoritarian, totalitarian governments.
	And he still will. I mean, they just put out another thing saying, you've got to use the right pronouns, people's preferred pronouns, and you can't deadname people.
	And so when I saw that, I responded and I said, does that mean I can't talk about Bruce Jinder?
	Or about Dick Devine?
	You know, Richard Levine?
	Who calls himself Rachel?
	So, you know, I'm not playing that stuff.
	I don't care if they kick me off of Google.
	I might as well not even be there now when I waste the time to post stuff on there.
	Should I really be doing this?
	Or is there something better I can do with my time?
	Because they've so limited my reach and visibility there.
	I mean, they have pegged me at exactly the same amount.
	Not up or down. And I've watched this stuff years ago.
	I watched as it would go up over the weekends and then be taken off during the week when the guy comes back.
	They're still doing that to me with Elon Musk.
	It's a joke. But getting back to the universal basic income and Silicon Valley, George Gilder called them neo-Marxists.
	He said the conceit of Karl Marx at the time of the Industrial Revolution was the idea we had infinite capacity to produce stuff because now we've got factories.
	We're not sitting there making stuff by hand anymore.
	We're mass-producing stuff. We're going to have stuff everywhere.
	And you can almost, you know, when you compare the change from cottage industries to big factories in terms of making even clothing, I could understand his perspective and his not understanding and not being able to see where this is going.
	But now these people in Silicon Valley, they think that with their genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence and nanotech, that they have infinite capacity.
	They're suffering from the same conceit as Karl Marx, and they think all they have to do, just like Karl Marx thought, these Marxists and these neo-Marxists in Silicon Valley think all they have to do is allocate the products that we have infinite capacity to build.
	And that's the conceit that is at the center of UBI.
	However, they also want to be the ones who do the allocating and the ones who control and own everything.
	Wes Robertson says starvation has always been a strategy used by the City of London, also known as the Central Banking Cartel to force compliance with the local population.
	The 10 million starved out in India by the East India Company.
	In 1771 was a determining factor for the colonies to go to war with Britain to gain our independence.
	Yep, yep, absolutely right.
	SoloCat1980. Depopulation Donald is pleased that he has served his Jesuit masters in Rome.
	Yeah, you know, that's the thing.
	It's just, again, we'll talk about this today.
	Great clip. Perhaps you've seen it, perhaps you haven't.
	But I'd seen it sometime before, and I was going to play it, but it was very long.
	I thought, well, I'll, but, you know, you never can get too much of Catherine Austin Fitz, quite frankly.
	And she gets back and forth into a discussion with Greg Hunter, USA watchdog.
	This guy is trying to pull every argument to excuse what Trump did in 2020.
	Catherine Austin Fitz ain't buying one of them.
	And she shuts him down over and over again.
	It's a great interview, so I'm going to play that coming up.
	We're going to kind of do that as an interview.
	It's a seven-minute clip, but we're going to play it in its entirety because it's so good.
	Brian Taylor, I don't understand how people can think shutting down farms is a good thing.
	They're so isolated.
	People cannot connect the dots.
	You know, they can't connect what happened in 2020 with the president.
	Now, they will connect everything that's happened in 2021 and on with Biden, but they won't connect anything with Trump.
	And you get people like Bannon and Pasobey and Mike Flynn and everything at these conferences, and they're telling him, oh yeah, you know, he's this great guy, and he's going to fix everything that he didn't fix his first term and all the rest of the stuff.
	And they... They just don't want to believe it.
	They are in this bubble of what they want to believe.
	Fregan says, the mere phrase, sustainable development, makes me want to vomit.
	Oh, I agree. I agree.
	And yet, isn't it interesting that the society that they are envisioning is not really sustainable.
	It is a society that is based upon tyranny.
	Tyranny is never sustainable.
	People will rise up and throw this down.
	It may take 70 years for people to do it.
	But this system will not stand that they're designing if they get it in.
	And if people understand what this is, I think they'll shut it down.
	But the key thing is that people are not making common cause with the farmers.
	You look at this, all these different places throughout Europe.
	All it is is the farmers say, well, this is going to put me out of business, so I'm going to fight this.
	But the people in the cities don't see that they're going to be starving with this.
	And eating soylent green at the same time.
	So not joining them. Brian Taylor, so you can sell the raw milk, but not cream or butter made from that.
	How does that make any sense?
	None of it makes any sense.
	That's the whole point. When you look at this stuff, the devil is in the details, isn't it?
	And it's how you can show how the devil is in this agenda.
	And the so-called sustainable, none of it makes any sense when you look at it.
	Except for people who want to remain in control.
	Gordon Shumway, universal Bolshevik income.
	Yeah, you're right.
	That's what it is. And it is total Bolshevik from the get-go.
	So here's how big UBI has gotten.
	$125 million now.
	You go to LA, you go to New York, and all these different places where they've started putting it in.
	And again, it's selective.
	We're only going to do X number of people, and we're only going to do it for a certain period of time, and we're only going to give them $1,000 a month or whatever.
	And do you see Donald Trump's fingerprints in all of this as well, with a stimulus check?
	I said it at the time. I said, do you see what he's doing here?
	He's locked us down, and then he's going to hand-feed us.
	They're pacifying people with this stuff.
	Put a mask on your face, stand there, be a good boy, and I'll send you a little stimmy check.
	And everybody's so excited. Look at this, I've got free money, isn't this great?
	Well, it's going to be hell to pay back.
	It's now expanding at a trillion dollars a month.
	And that was all kicked off by Donnie, the king of bankruptcy, to bankrupt America.
	He can't even run casinos without bankrupting them.
	He can't even run a country that prints his own money without bankrupting it as well.
	But this is a deliberate effort.
	Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. He says, the top story in the news yesterday here in Norway was that the scientists never had seen so high a numbers in young people dying.
	They blamed anything except the vaccine.
	Well, that's right. And you know, even going back to the beginning of this, I had arguments on social media when I was still engaging with people.
	I said, there's no excess deaths from this pandemic.
	Oh, yes, there are excess deaths.
	It's not from the pandemic.
	There's not. It's from the death protocol.
	They're killing people.
	They're refusing to treat them.
	And then they're taking sick people and putting them in the nursing homes to multiply that out.
	You know, they are just pointing a finger at somebody.
	They don't have a PCR test, and even if they did have a PCR test, it's total nonsense.
	From the very beginning, getting back to the universal Bolshevik income.
	Yeah, that's right. $125 million now in various American UBI programs.
	But again, they don't call it universal.
	They call it basic income, or they call it something else, like Trump called it his stimulus check.
	No strings attached, right?
	When you got your stimulus check, they didn't tell you what you could spend it on.
	Of up to $36,000 per year, including one District of Columbia scheme, Washington, D.C. scheme, that they said, if you want to, you can take it as a lump sum.
	And so I had a welfare mom said, yeah, I'll take it.
	Blows it, gets $10,000 in D.C. and blows it on a $6,000 vacation in Miami.
	A taxpayer-funded, guaranteed income program that hands struggling families.
	Struggling? Up to $36,000 with no strings attached being rolled out across the country.
	The schemes whose total value now exceeds $125 million in the U.S. Oh, that's nothing.
	Just wait. I mean, look at how much that stimulus check got up to.
	But the radical programs have been criticized after it emerged one mother of three in Washington spent more than half of the $10,800 lump sum on a luxury holiday.
	Kenesha Miller...
	27. Spent $6,000 on a vacation for herself.
	Her partner and their three children purchased 15 new outfits for the children and spent $180 on haircuts.
	I'm assuming that these outfits are not like Sound of Music, you know, whatever.
	She makes the outfits for the outing out of the curtains or whatever.
	It's either a stimulus check, kids, or it's curtains.
	She was given the money through the first project in the country to offer the money as a lump sum rather than monthly payments.
	Similar programs in cities from L.A. to New York offer payments of up to $1,000 per month for three years with no conditions on how the cash is blown.
	I mean, spent. Critics say the schemes destroy fundamental elements of the social contract, create the wrong incentives for people.
	Is that really any different than the big lump sum?
	Big lump sum is like $1,000 or whatever, $1,200 or whatever.
	You know, the stimulus check.
	What kind of incentives did that create?
	They claim cases like Miller's prove that offering money with no conditions on how it is spent is not a solution to inequality.
	It's not going to change your life.
	She had a vacation. Took a free vacation.
	Did she use it?
	Did she invest in it?
	In anything? No.
	Stanford University has a basic income lab.
	This is all coming out of California, Silicon Valley areas and stuff like that.
	They don't call it universal basic income, but they call it basic income.
	And they've got a lab.
	They said, we've got 153 of these projects now happening.
	The largest and costliest one is in LA, of course.
	3,200 participants get $1,000 a month for one year.
	So $3.2 million a year they're spending on this.
	Can't fix the potholes, though.
	The $36 million project was announced in October 2021, open to adult residents of the city who have at least one child or are pregnant and have an income below the federal poverty level.
	Is there a citizenship even requirement there?
	I'm sure there isn't.
	I'm sure there isn't.
	But again, it is going to be universal.
	L.A. is also the location of the second largest scheme, which pays $1,000 a month to 1,000 eligible residents of L.A. County for three years, also funded by taxpayers.
	And the third largest is in New York City.
	So the first two were in L.A., Then the third one is in New York, 600 participants who get between $500 and $1,000 a month for three years.
	So, this lady who blew it all on a vacation to Miami, it included a boat tour, And they also visited museums, took a swamp wildlife tour, and ate out together during the trip.
	Isn't that interesting? Kind of like Coles to Newcastle.
	She leaves the swamp, and then she goes to a literal swamp in Florida to see what everybody was talking about.
	So, we're going to take a quick break and we come back.
	Well, before we do, before we do, let me just talk about where we are in terms of the, well, actually, I'll do that when we come back because I don't have a link to that here right now.
	So, we'll talk about that when we come back.
	Stay with us. We'll be right back.
	Hear news now at APSradionews.com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story
	story.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you All right, welcome back. As a matter of fact, let's go to a climate here.
	We have scientists have proposed the virus.
	Actually, this was last week.
	How did I get over here? I've lost my place.
	See, this is the problem that you don't have with paper.
	Paper is a lot easier to keep track of things.
	And so here we are.
	I'm working my way around this process.
	This project here today.
	As a matter of fact, now that I'm in the right folder, I just wanted to talk about this before we get over it, and that's, you know, when people are chasing money, there's an op-ed piece here from Adam Singer.
	He says, chasing shadows.
	That's really what we're chasing, isn't it?
	And when you stop and think about it, yeah, we all know that fiat currency is pretty empty, pretty meaningless, but And yet isn't even any kind of wealth?
	I mean, it could be real.
	It could be tangible. It could be something that, as far as this world is concerned, is going to hold its value better.
	You know, things like gold or real estate or something like that.
	And yet, it's all temporary because we will be removed.
	It may remain here until the world is removed, but we're going to be removed.
	We are just as temporary as this petrodollar that is there.
	Charlie Munger. Warren Buffett's friend, partner, had an interesting quote that begins this article from Adam Singer.
	He says, envy is a really stupid sin because it's the only one you could never possibly have any fun at.
	There's a lot of pain and no fun.
	So why would you want to get on that trolley?
	And again, he doesn't talk about greed.
	He doesn't talk about the love of money.
	He talks about envy.
	That's one of the seven deadly sins that he notices.
	Because of being one of the world's richest men, he can see that envy in all the rest of these other people out there, but he doesn't see his greed, his love of money, and all the rest of this stuff.
	We're all blind to our own sins.
	We see the other ones that are out there.
	And, you know, there's some of the seven deadly sins.
	I guess, you know, Donald Trump has checked off all those boxes on seven deadly sins.
	Probably Charlie Munger as well.
	But he says, this is Adam Singer, he says, my friend recently wrote on the trend of successful YouTubers who are quitting.
	He says this post will at least partially explain why they burned out and threw in the towel.
	Imagine amassing millions of subscribers to share your thoughts with the world, only to decide to stop.
	By all measures, these people are successful, but something is missing.
	They got into it for the wrong reasons.
	Ending up as a slave to an audience, and they were unable to pivot spiritually.
	He says, or maybe it was just simply that the work was not meaningful to them.
	He says, on the other hand, as just a hobby, he says, I've written music for 20 years now.
	He says, I don't make any money off of it.
	But he said, I have no expectations.
	The audience demands or the need for a financial return for the art.
	So he just does it as an amateur, you know, just out of the love of it.
	And so there is a, you know, what do we do in terms of, as we're looking at universal basic income, you know, what is it that we're to do?
	I mean, do we just sit there waiting for the next check to be handed out?
	And, you know, as soon as we get a check, we go, you know, buy some luxury good or something in America because people are not starving in America.
	The problem we have is not starvation.
	The problem we have is obesity.
	And there's a lot of reasons for that that I think have to do not only with the junk food, the quality of food, and the things that are in it, including things like glyphosate, as I pointed out a couple of weeks ago.
	They saw, in terms of rats, they saw not the first generation that was consuming glyphosate because it was in their food supply, and not the second generation.
	But the third generation, in other words, the grandchildren of the generation that got it.
	And I look at it, you know, we go back and Gerald Slenty will talk about it a lot.
	And you see the pictures of people in Russia.
	And so you look at mid-century America, you look at the people in Russia today.
	And the obesity that has taken over our country in every regard is not there.
	And I don't think it's simply the food they eat.
	You know, they ate a lot of potatoes and bread and other things like that.
	They ate a lot of sugar.
	Maybe they didn't have the high fructose corn syrup fructose.
	But, you know, that's a different thing.
	But it's even beyond that.
	It's the glyphosate and the other things that are disrupting our bodies that are there.
	I don't know how I've got off on that tangent, but as he points out in terms of money, he said many times we just make our goal money, the love of money.
	He said this creates a paradox.
	The relentless pursuit of attention and of wealth inevitably leads to a perpetual state of discontentment, chasing an unsustainable and spiritually empty high.
	And this is why you see the insecurity of Hollywood stars.
	Always very insecure, almost always, unless they get out of it.
	You know, some of them jumped off that train, you know, moved out of L.A. and lived a normal life.
	But the people who remain there are constantly insecure.
	Even if they have a big hit, they're wondering where the next one is going to come from.
	This desire for attention and wealth is what really feeds stuff.
	I had a person who kindly sent me a contribution, but then asked me, he said, I don't understand your issues with Tucker.
	It doesn't seem to me like he's doing anything that you didn't do when you were at Infowars.
	It's like, well, no, it's a very different thing, quite frankly.
	I never lied to people.
	First of all, I was there.
	I was able to say whatever I wanted to.
	He's made it very clear that he took $25 million a year because, and there were things that he was not allowed to say or he'd get fired, right?
	Even talking about 9-11 and other things like that.
	And he still will not tell people the straight shot on that.
	And so it's a different thing.
	When you are focused on how is it going to be received, in other words, if you change your information based on whether the audience wants to hear this or not, or whether the people who are paying you want to hear it or not, or whether your corporate sponsors want to hear this or not, When you start playing that game, you're not a trustworthy news source.
	And so that's the key.
	I don't have anything against Tucker.
	I mean, I've, you know, met him once, didn't talk to him much, but, you know, just, hey, how you doing?
	He's a very nice guy. Same thing with Sean Hannity.
	But I really don't like what they tell people and how they manipulate.
	I think they know better. I really do.
	I don't think that...
	I think what they're doing, they're doing for audience.
	And they're doing for money.
	That makes all the difference in the world.
	Anyway, the pursuit itself inevitably overshadows the appreciation of what one already possesses, leading to a spiral of dissatisfaction.
	If you're doing it out of the love of money, you cannot ever be satisfied with it because you'll always want to have more money, as we see with all these billionaires.
	Never enough. How much is enough?
	A reporter asked John D. Rockefeller.
	He said, just a little bit more, right?
	When attention is a primary goal, people find themselves trapped in a quest for validation.
	And this doesn't have to be somebody who's like Tucker or somebody who's like Alex Jones.
	It can affect anybody. Anybody can get addicted to this, as we see.
	Teenagers get addicted to the attention on social media.
	And I think this is all planned as well.
	At the same time, you had the CIA and other people setting up the venture capital firms that were going to back Facebook and Google and all the rest of these companies.
	At the same time they were setting all that stuff up, you had the entertainment industry running Big Brother.
	And everybody was looking at just ordinary slobs who had no talent or drive or anything to offer.
	You know, they were just hanging around.
	And the only thing they had to offer was exhibitionism of their life.
	And that turned them into celebrities.
	And people got drawn into that.
	And then, voila, social media arrives.
	And they can all have an opportunity to try to do that by being exhibitionists in their life.
	Social media platforms bring this kind of dissatisfaction to the masses that used to just be there for people in Hollywood.
	The pursuit of money can similarly trap somebody in a matrix of discontent, or we should say the love of it.
	There's countless examples of those who attained incredible wealth and fame, yet found themselves profoundly dissatisfied with life or worse.
	And this is why I wanted to connect this with the universal basic income.
	Here's somebody who won the lottery.
	This is not some lump sum payment of $10,000.
	William Budd Post III. In 1988, he won $16.2 million in the Pennsylvania lottery.
	But his jackpot brought him more misfortune than happiness.
	And this story we've seen repeated over and over again from people who hit the jackpot with these lotteries or gambling winnings or something like that.
	All of a sudden, they get this massive influx of cash.
	Initially, he squandered his winnings on extravagant purchases.
	You know, like a vacation in Hawaii or whatever.
	Or in Miami. Including a mansion, luxury cars, a twin-engine airplane.
	He also found himself surrounded by people seeking to exploit his newfound wealth.
	Well, at least the lady who got the lump sum payment in Washington, D.C. didn't have that problem.
	There wasn't that much money to go around.
	Post-relationships deteriorated, he faced numerous lawsuits and legal troubles.
	His brother even hired a hitman to kill him in hopes of inheriting a share of the winnings.
	His extravagant lifestyle led to financial ruin, and he eventually declared bankruptcy.
	He later reflected on his lottery win, saying that it was the worst thing that ever happened to him.
	You see, this is what's going to happen.
	With universal basic income, no matter how much money they give people, just as we saw the stimulus check, it'll immediately be spent.
	It isn't something that is going to change their lives, except it's going to make them dependent.
	It's going to make them dependent. So, again, this love of money, this fear of it, just like the love and the idolatry of so many different things, but it's money especially.
	You know, Jesus had a great deal to say about money, didn't he?
	And he said, don't store up your treasures on this earth.
	Where rust and moth and other things, thieves will take it.
	Yeah, don't do that.
	Store up... But this, in terms of heaven, things that you can do here, good things that are not going to earn your salvation.
	You can't earn your salvation.
	But there are things that there's going to be a reward attached to.
	And as far as the fear of money, we know that God provides for the birds of the field.
	He grows the flowers. He provides everything that they need.
	And as he said, your Heavenly Father knows what you need.
	And you don't have to worry about it.
	Because you can't change any of it by worrying.
	So, again, when we look at these schemes, when we look about the dollarization and everything, I want people to understand and make some preparation.
	You should prepare for yourself, and you should prepare for your family, and you should prepare to help your neighbors.
	And you need to know, if you're going to prepare, you need to know what these people are planning on doing.
	But it doesn't mean that you get fearful about it.
	But don't be...
	Completely naive about it either.
	Before we take a break, we've had some comments about some of these things.
	Guard Goldsmith. Good to see you there, Guard.
	He says, do these political clowns realize that their face paint is petroleum-based?
	That's good. I like that.
	And then about the food.
	KFB says, City folk don't understand where food comes from.
	Public school at work.
	Absolutely clueless. That's right.
	It comes wrapped in plastic or cardboard.
	That's where it comes from.
	It comes from the factory. So what's the big deal, right?
	Oh, so you're saying the Gates is going to make the food in the factory?
	What's the big deal? All the food comes from a factory now anyway, right?
	Yeah. Beyond Hell writes, food comes from the grocery store.
	Everybody knows that. That's right.
	Brian and Deb McCartney, good to see you there.
	He says, most people have no idea where food comes from.
	That's right. Wes Robertson, they think little magical fairies bring it to them, to their grocery stores.
	He answered them. I'm going to honk, says, until real solutions are proposed and people get active, I'm just going to keep prepping.
	Good. Harder times ahead, unfortunately.
	I agree. And I think things are going to get...
	You know, they're going to, I don't really expect to see something happen this year, unless, you know, it's always a possibility.
	I'm just saying probabilities.
	If they've got an election plan that doesn't look like that, they may trigger something.
	But I really expect them to be able to get whoever they want in, and politically.
	And then I think then all hell's going to break loose in 2025.
	But it could happen sooner.
	Yeah. But don't worry about it.
	God sees what's happening.
	You know, you worry about your relationship with God, not with Donald Trump or Washington, okay?
	Guard Goldsmith, again, about the milk farmer.
	He says, the idea that one has to get a permit to engage in free trade is stunning, even more stunning that so many people blithely accept that government diktat.
	I absolutely agree. You know, when we started our business, people said, you've got to get a business privilege license.
	I said, what? A business privilege license?
	So, it's a privilege to work, but if I want to get welfare, it's a right.
	And that's right. That's America.
	Yeah. Land of the fee, home of the slave.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, they say the heart You'll love the classic hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APS radio.com Hi, I'm Johnnie Robinson.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Johnnie Robinson.
	And I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	I'm your host, Amy Adams.
	Welcome to APS Radio.
	Alright, before we get into the updates on the election stuff, we have, let's take a look at the food stuff.
	The UN, again, is this last fall at their most recent COP28. Cop out.
	They want to starve us with that.
	But let's take a look at what they're doing with the cars.
	Because you can see how the central planning is going to work out.
	It's already crashing and burning, literally, with the EVs.
	One major car maker resisted EV mania.
	Now it is raking in the cash.
	And that's Toyota. You look at Ford and GM, they're getting massive losses.
	Added to the bottom line from their EV stuff, Toyota got a lot of criticism because they said, well, you know, we really think the hybrid thing is the way to go.
	The problem, though, is the governments don't like that.
	Well, the hybrid, even though it reduced emissions and upped the gasoline stuff, and it was practical for consumers because you still could have an engine that you could fill up.
	Oh, but no, we've got to have absolute zero emissions.
	And so now they're banning the hybrids in various places, but Toyota's continuing to sell those and selling them 40 times as many of those as they do the battery-operated electric cars.
	And Toyota is looking at this and saying, you know, this just is not sustainable.
	The technology is not there.
	And so they said, well, you want zero emissions?
	Let's see if we can't do it some other way.
	So they started playing around with hydrogen stuff, which is not finished.
	That technology is not done either.
	And there's no distribution network for it.
	But it's like, okay, you're telling me that you're concerned about emissions, right?
	Well, let's see if we can do something about emissions.
	And I think, you know, they're kind of puzzled, like a lot of doctors and nurses were puzzled by the pandemic, MacGuffin.
	I said, okay, so you're telling us there's this virus that's out there.
	Well, you know, what you do in terms of putting people on invasive ventilators, that doesn't seem to work.
	And why don't you let us try this or try that or try this other thing?
	How about ivermectin or HCQ and zinc or something?
	No, no, no, no, nothing.
	Nothing other than this. And it's like, okay, I think there's something else involved here besides the pandemic or something else besides the climate.
	Because you've got a particular thing that you want to shove down our throats.
	So you're not looking for solutions to this problem.
	You've just got something you want to impose on people.
	So Toyota is riding a windfall of hybrid vehicle sales on its way to posting projected net profits of more than $30 billion for the fiscal year ending in March.
	And so, how does that compare to some of the others?
	Well, $30 billion profit, Ford is making a...
	Ford is making a $4.3 billion profit.
	Toyota is making $30.
	Now, Ford could be making a $9 billion profit, which still would be small compared to Toyota.
	But, you know, they had a $4.7 billion loss.
	And so their net income is only $4.3.
	Similar situation with GM as well.
	Because Toyota has decided that they're not exactly going to let Joe Biden design the cars.
	Or Ursula fond of lying in the EU. A 6.6% increase in sales instead of car dealers that are just stacking up.
	They've got inventory in most of these other car dealerships.
	It's 150% greater than it was last year.
	So Toyota sold 15,000 EVs.
	They're just battery EVs.
	But they sold 600,000 non-rechargeable hybrids in the U.S. In other words, 40 times as many.
	And that is what people are looking at.
	In other words, it's a practical situation.
	And it's a technology that is far more practical because it's far more mature.
	Ford jumped onto this because, you know, hey, Biden said so.
	The company previously planned to be able to produce 300,000 EVs per year by 2023 and 2 million annually by 2026.
	But it did later miss both targets, according to NPR. Moreover, Ford lost, like I said, $65,000 on every EV they sold, which is absolutely astounding.
	I mean, they're not selling these cars, you know, even though they're more expensive.
	Some of these cars cost less than $65,000.
	And yet they're losing $65,000 on each one of these cars.
	That's where their $4.7 billion loss came in.
	I guess they decided they'd make it up on volume.
	We're losing $65,000 per car we sell, but we're going to make it up in volume.
	They're also slowing down their investment.
	They plan on putting $12 billion into the EV business.
	But you know, this is the way it works.
	If you keep losing money, you don't have any to invest.
	Toyota appears to be in better shape than competitors because Toyota chooses to be less guided by central planners and political correctness and more by consumers.
	In other words, the marketplace.
	GM has backed off its goal to manufacture 400,000 EVs by the middle of this year.
	They missed their projected target by 50%.
	You know, they can make these things.
	They can sell them maybe at a loss, but they're not going to sell that many of them.
	And now Toyota is coming up with even something.
	They continue to try to come up with workarounds to these idiots in government who are trying to design the cars.
	Now, this is something that actually concerns me.
	And it actually sucks, quite frankly.
	Toyota is testing a car that sucks CO2 out of the atmosphere.
	I don't like this. What are the plants going to get?
	How can they breathe if we take all the CO2 out, right?
	Seriously, I don't like the sequestration of carbon dioxide.
	It's there for a purpose. God created plants to consume CO2 so they could breathe out oxygen.
	So if you cut the CO2, you're going to be cutting plant growth, you're going to be cutting oxygen ultimately, and food as well.
	But they have to do this to appease these dictator politicians.
	I say, let's suck the politicians out of the atmosphere, because they're polluting everything with their insanity.
	Electric cars are a nice idea, says Futurism, which is a left-leaning technology.
	They buy into all this stuff.
	Electric cars are a nice idea, but the reality of their range and battery issues keeps dragging them back to Earth.
	Toyota is seizing on that reality with a wild idea.
	Built-in filters that capture carbon dioxide.
	The stuff that causes global warming.
	Or so we're told, right?
	I don't believe this.
	Never have believed it. They've never proved it.
	They haven't proved global warming to my satisfaction, let alone a connection to any activity of mankind, especially to CO2. As a matter of fact, there's plenty of proof to the contrary.
	And the way that they manipulate this is by manipulating the models, by manipulating the starting and stopping points and all the rest of the stuff.
	They have lied to us my entire life.
	I've seen this stuff. And I've seen 50 years of false prophetic science models.
	When are we going to say enough is enough?
	So it sucks up so much CO2 that their climate sins can be forgiven, says futurism.
	See, it's an indulgence.
	You pay in advance with these carbon taxes.
	Carbon taxes are like, you know, the Pope's indulgence in the Middle Ages.
	Well, you're going to sin?
	Okay, well, give me some money first and then go sin.
	You know, that type of thing.
	Because I needed to build St.
	Peter's, you know. And that was the thing that really helped to kick off the Protestant Reformation in Germany.
	They kept having... These holidays.
	Holy days. Well, let's have another holiday.
	And you're going to have to close your business.
	Because it's a holy day.
	You can't be open on a holiday.
	And so pay us some money and we'll let you keep your business open.
	And merchants were getting really tired of that scheme.
	We should be getting tired of this scheme.
	Carbon tax scheme.
	The idea that any activity is going to produce carbon.
	Yes, we are carbon-based life forms, so any activity is going to produce carbon.
	And that's not a sin, and it doesn't need to be forgiven, and we don't need to buy our way out of their self-imposed purgatory on us for using energy.
	And so what it does, but this Toyota thing is going to capture air and then extract the CO2 from it, and then it's going to use waste heat from the engine to inject the CO2 into a disposable liquid.
	Now, I'm hoping that you'll be able to do a CO2-ectomy of this thing.
	Maybe this will be a way for them to sell the cars.
	And as long as we can stop inspections at the local level, then you could pay extra to get this bag on the side, like some kind of a colostomy or something.
	CO2 colostomy. Just cut this thing off when you get it home.
	Pay somebody. I'm sure there'd be a budding market for people to cut that off and then to reprogram the computer so you don't have this nagging light and sound or something saying, it's not working, it's not working.
	It's like, yes, I know because I threw it in the trash can.
	But anyway, the project is also another sure sign that Toyota remains strikingly unsold on electric vehicles.
	Yeah, you know, it's, you can imagine the consternation of Biden and these central planners.
	You know, it's like, I think we've got them.
	You know, everything that people do is going to create carbon dioxide.
	So we tell everybody we've got to measure the carbon dioxide.
	And then Toyota comes up, the engineers at Toyota come up with this deal.
	Well, we can recycle the carbon dioxide, and we can do more of it than the car is actually using.
	And I just say, Biden, no!
	We thought we had him with our skyhooks, and now they've found a way to redo the skyhooks.
	What are we going to do now? Because that's what this is.
	This whole ridiculous scheme that Toyota's coming up with, there's nothing more than a pacifier that they're sticking in the mouth of politicians like Biden.
	That's all it is. F111, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. I said, thank you for including godly values in your commentary.
	Well, I can't do this news on a regular basis without turning to God.
	You know, the more you look at this dark world and these politicians...
	You've got to have some hope in something, right?
	And when we talk about hope, we're not talking about something that, well, you know, I hope that happens, but you don't really think it's going to happen.
	No, the word, when we talk about hope in the biblical standpoint, right, that word is confident expectation.
	The English definition of hope has changed over the years.
	That's what it used to mean back when they were first doing the translations, you know, back in the King James Version and stuff like that.
	But now, you know, that word has, you know, gradually changed its meaning.
	No, it still means... Confident expectation.
	And so that's a good thing we all need to have, really.
	Toyota, depending on their engineers instead of government, says S-Flow 0818.
	Yeah, you're absolutely right.
	My son says it could ironically be good for farmers who want to add CO2 to their greenhouses.
	Yeah, we'll see what form it takes.
	When they convert it to a liquid, I'm almost wondering...
	If they're going to turn that into a fuel, you know, because they did this ridiculous thing with Porsche, right?
	I say to the German government, don't ban our internal combustion engines.
	We got an idea of how we can repurpose fuel.
	You know, we can extract CO2 out of the air.
	All right, well, where are you getting your energy?
	Yeah, you're going to generate CO2. No, we will use windmills, and we'll put them at the tip of South America, Patagonia or whatever, where the wind is constantly blowing.
	And so it'll be pristine energy, and we'll use that energy to extract the CO2 out of the air, and we'll make a liquid fuel that can be then put into a standard internal combustion engine.
	It's built to run on gasoline or something like that.
	They called it e-fuel.
	Now, as you can imagine, with this bespoke fuel that comes from these pristine area of these windmills in a certain area of Latin America, you can bet this thing is going to be really expensive.
	But hey, we're talking about Porsches here, right?
	But maybe with a Toyota, maybe they'll grab this stuff, turn it into a liquid, and then you can maybe even feed it back into your tank.
	Who knows? Like a perpetual motion machine.
	It runs off of thin air, CO2. And that means that we're going to have to make more CO2. Those of us who don't choose to go that route, we'll be doing our part for the environment because we'll be putting the CO2 out there that the plants and now the Toyotas need in order to run.
	This is a public service.
	My barbecuing and raising cows and all of these, any activity that I engage in.
	Gordon Schwamway.
	Spontaneous combustion is a selling point.
	There you go. That's going to be what it is.
	SoloCat1980 says EV stands for exploding vehicle.
	Yeah, pretty much, isn't it?
	Denver Attaway. Lines up with a theory that Western leadership is intentionally de-industrializing the West with de-growth policy.
	Toyota is an Eastern country company.
	Japan, right? That's right.
	Oh, I agree. Absolutely agree.
	I don't think that they're on it to the extent that the other people are.
	But remember, it also applies to our food, right?
	This last fall, was it November, December, when they had the last COP thing, the UN is saying everybody's got to have less meat.
	And we just, you know, leading meat and dairy companies have got to reduce emissions.
	One of them said at this COP28, From the UN, again from the UN, why don't we kick them out of America?
	I mean, don't just stop funding them, which we ought to do that as well.
	But again, you know, Trump didn't defund them.
	He didn't kick them out of America.
	Because these people all see America as the seat of world government.
	But they said the UN, food system emissions deserve a place at the top of the table.
	Yeah, let them eat carbon taxes.
	Alongside energy and transport, as they represent an estimated third of greenhouse gas emissions and 40% of methane.
	Well, those are your estimations, and that's your agenda, and it's all nonsense.
	But again, you know, it's right there below the cars.
	First, we've got to get rid of the cars, and then we get rid of the farms, right?
	So that's where these people are headed.
	Gordon Schwamway says, I remember just a decade ago when the only thing that the U.S. produced that was in demand globally was pickup trucks and movies.
	Now, people would still like to have the pickup trucks.
	We just can't build them.
	And movies, nobody wants what America is making anymore with that.
	Imagine that, says, who wants an EV Mustang made in Mexico with a battery made in Poland?
	White Knight 126, the greater the solution...
	The greater the problem, it will also create.
	Yeah. Gordon Schwalm says, I'm doing my part to reduce the effects of global warming by eating those repugnant cows that make copious amounts of methane from their butts.
	Well, the e-bikes in New York are making copious fires everywhere.
	30 fires involving lithium batteries in 2019.
	And then that tripled in 2021 to 104.
	Then it soared to 268 last year.
	And now in just the first two months of 2024, 31 such fires have already been recorded.
	There's been 26 injuries and one death.
	Think about that. So just going back to 2019...
	What the number of e-bike fires in New York for the entire year has now been exceeded in just the first two months of this year.
	So the federal government has spent a lot of money to a lot of your money, my money, or whatever, but it's just made-up money, right?
	Who cares? Well, we're going to have to pay that debt off, and we don't pay the debt off, and if this de-dollarization crash, well, we're all going to pay for it one way or the other.
	But, you know, they're subsidizing all kinds of EV construction from e-bikes to cars to 18-wheelers and airplanes and tanks, you know, because the Pentagon wants to get in on this fad as well, military-industrial complex.
	But the problem is that it's all coming from China.
	And China has a low-cost alternative to all this stuff because they have been allowed to create an industrial base as we destroy our industrial base.
	And they also have access to the minerals, of course.
	So the only breaks on China destroying the entire world auto market are tariffs.
	You see, as Biden and these other people, the level of subversion to our economy is not even comprehended by most people.
	Because as they push us into the EVs, they push us in ultimately to China.
	And everybody is saying, well, when are they going to pull the trigger on that?
	Without the tariffs... Ford, GM, and every other non-Chinese automaker would quickly be forced into bankruptcy.
	If we are forced to buy EVs, they have by far and away the cheapest EVs.
	Because again, they are allowed to have cheap energy.
	They can build as many power plants as they do as they want.
	And they don't have to put anything on them to clean them.
	So all this stuff about global warming and global climate change is absolute nonsense when they allow China and India to do whatever they want.
	It's simply relocating the industrial base to those countries.
	And if you ban the technology that we have an edge on, the internal combustion engines, well, then that's going to do it.
	Rivian has fallen on hard times.
	It's laid off 10% of its workers.
	Mercedes has downsized its EV sales projections by 50% for 2030.
	Ford has now stopped all shipments of the Lightning F-150.
	As I pointed out, they're losing like $65,000 for every EV that they produced.
	So, even in North Carolina, I talked about this.
	There's a battery plant that was being put in there from, I think it's the same one.
	This says Albemarle announced it was deferring spending on a planned $1.3 billion plant in North Carolina.
	That name doesn't seem familiar to me.
	There was a project...
	Where the Vietnamese company was going to build lithium batteries in North Carolina and the billions of dollars subsidy from governments to do that.
	But even that is backing off.
	In the UK, auto dealers are offering discounts of up to 25% on EVs that are sitting on their lots and they still can't get rid of them.
	So where is China in all of this?
	All of these companies who have followed Biden down this yellow brick road of EVs, they're in big trouble.
	And the bigger trouble is the fact that the Chinese can just dump all this stuff.
	The Chinese have been overproducing, because they have a centralized economy as well, just like they've been overproducing in terms of real estate construction.
	And they've created this massive problem, especially for commercial real estate there, even before all the lockdowns.
	And they've overbuilt so much of the stuff there.
	They're creating a banking crisis for them as well.
	But they're also overbuilding in terms of electric vehicles.
	And so...
	As they point out in this article, the obvious ability of China to dominate the EV market coupled with an increasing public resistance to EV mandates has put pressure even on the European Union.
	A year ago, they took a baby step backward, agreeing to allow sales and registration of internal combustion engine vehicles after the 2035 deadline.
	If they operate only on carbon neutral fuels.
	And again, that was a baby step.
	That was what Porsche and I think Ferrari were pushing for that.
	All right, all right, all right.
	We'll let the elites still have their internal combustion engines, but they're going to have to use that special e-fuel.
	It comes from Patagonia or whatever.
	Biden had, until very recently, doubled down on his EV demands.
	But just a week ago, the EPA indicated that it was, quote, considering our royal masters, our unelected, unaccountable masters at the EPA, are considering delaying their EV mandates beyond 2030.
	But as I point out, it's an election year.
	And they can just abandon that and flip around in no time at all.
	So, as all this is happening, the Epoch Times is producing yet another long article, which I've talked about this for the longest time.
	Dr. Willie Soon and others are talking about the climate change models.
	And how they're cherry-picking their starting points and all the rest of this stuff.
	This has been around for decades.
	For decades. But now, I think there may be an opportunity because people are starting to see the end game.
	Oh, you don't want us to have any cars, any transportation.
	You don't want us to have any homes.
	You want to lock us in a 15-minute city.
	You don't want us having meat or dairy.
	You only want us to be able to buy three items of clothing a year.
	This is what the C40 agenda is.
	The big cities that have banded together, a lot of these big global cities, and they have put this out.
	This is where they want to go.
	One trip every three years of less than a thousand miles.
	And people are looking at this, and in the past, when they'd sell this stuff, it's like, oh, okay, sure, why wouldn't we want to clean things up?
	Why wouldn't we want to have green stuff?
	Maybe it's just a little bit more expensive, but who cares?
	So the liberals who typically can't afford it, right?
	But now people are looking at this and saying, wait a minute, they're going to cut out meat and dairy and travel and clothing and all the rest of this stuff?
	Do you have a good reason for doing this?
	And that's the key thing.
	Once people see this agenda, then they're going to take a closer look, I think, at these models.
	In the same way that when we had the pandemic, MacGuffin, people were saying, wait a minute, you're shutting everything down and putting masks on our faces and telling us that you're going to inject us?
	Can we see your evidence for this pandemic?
	How about, did you do any tests on this vaccine?
	Once you start to get to that level, I think people are going to start to wake up.
	Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tips.
	Says, I feel supporting you is no different than supporting a missionary.
	You go out into the world with true Christian doctrine and warming.
	Well, thank you very much. Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. KWD68 says, make America decentralized again.
	Mata. Mata. What's the matter with you?
	What's the matter with you? Brian and Deb McCartney says, we're tired of all the bike lanes that nobody ever occupies.
	It just makes more traffic accidents, and that's part of their agenda.
	That's right. They call it a road diet.
	As I said, when Karen and I were in Tampa, maybe about 2016 or something, and all these streets that I knew, they hadn't changed anything about them except that they had put them on a diet, had all these bike lanes there, and we didn't see anybody ever in any of those bike lanes.
	We were downtown trying to take care of some...
	Estate business and stuff like that.
	And my parents passing away.
	And so we were downtown Tampa the whole time.
	And one day we saw one guy, one middle-aged guy, riding a bicycle.
	I said, that's all for him.
	He's the only one who's using it.
	And so we're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about the horse race.
	Stay with us. And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the oldies channel at APS radio.com
	I got the horse right here.
	The name is Paul Revere.
	And here's a guy that says if the weather's clear, can do, can do.
	This guy says the horse can do.
	If he says the horse can do, can do, can do.
	Yeah, it's horse race time.
	And the press is loving every moment of it.
	Whether you're talking about CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, or the big con alternative media.
	They all love this. Well, we're going to talk a little bit about this because we need to put this in perspective.
	And so let's begin by catching up over the weekend.
	What's happening with the horse race?
	Nikki Haley won in the District of Columbia.
	Yeah, that's about the only place she's going to win anywhere in that statist area right there.
	But tomorrow is Super Tuesday, and there's going to be 15 states that are going to be holding their primaries all at once.
	This is most likely the last time she will win anything anywhere.
	Washington is one of the most heavily Democratic jurisdictions in the nation.
	With only about 23,000 registered Republicans in the city, Democrat Biden won the district in 2020 with 92% of the vote.
	She held a rally there in D.C. She got all of 100 people who showed up.
	And she joked and she says, who says that there's no Republicans in D.C.? Come on.
	Yeah, we got at least 100 of them.
	And they all voted for her, I guess.
	Anyway, she began criticizing Trump.
	And here's one of the issues here, right?
	Big issue. In Washington, you might think that some of these people would be a little bit more focused on policy or something, right?
	And they are. But in the wrong way, she began criticizing Trump for running up the federal deficit.
	A very valid criticism.
	But instead, there's a person in the audience who yelled out, said, but he can't win a general election.
	It's madness. So, in other words, who cares?
	I got the horse right here.
	Her name is Paul Revere.
	And she can do.
	She can do it. She can win.
	We don't care about deficits in D.C. Don't you know that?
	Republican or Democrat, they don't care about deficits.
	And it's just somebody can win.
	So we're playing 4D chess here, right?
	Four out of ten Haley supporters in South Carolina's GOP primary were self-described moderates compared to 15% for Trump.
	But again, you know, when we look at this, and this is what's building up, and this is why we need to pay attention to this, Because the people who are Trump supporters are getting themselves worked up into a frenzy that is going to result in January the 6th, Part 2.
	And it's going to be worse because they're getting themselves built up into an even bigger frenzy.
	They've been working on this frenzy for four years.
	You know, they only had a couple of months to build up the anger and the wrath for January the 6th, but they've been doing this for quite some time.
	And what they don't realize...
	Is that intensity of support doesn't really matter.
	You can have somebody who is intensely loved by them, Donald Trump, who there is a significant portion of the population, maybe equal to them, that intensely hates him.
	And then the rest of the country that is just somewhat indifferent to pretty much everything, including the political process.
	And that's how you can lose an election.
	But if these people lose the election...
	They're ready for war.
	And we'll show that to you in a minute here.
	Trump, by the way, won in Idaho over the weekend.
	And then he won in Missouri.
	They had a Republican caucus.
	And he won 924 to nothing.
	I don't know if that's a number of delegates.
	I don't know how the caucus works.
	And frankly, again, this is a horse race.
	I'm not interested in getting into the details, and I'm sure that you're not interested in it either.
	But he won 100%, essentially, of whatever the process is there with a caucus, 100% of it.
	And then in Idaho, they did have a traditional voting thing, and he won with 85% of the vote in Idaho.
	Yeah, so that brings us to this Supreme Court decision, which they, yesterday, and this is a Supreme Court decision that they raced through because we had three states that had, at some level or the other, either at state level or at a local level, that said, we're not going to let Trump on the ballot.
	And so the Supreme Court said, we'll hear that.
	And then they expedited.
	And then they made it even faster.
	And yesterday they said, by 10 o'clock today.
	And so here we are about a half hour ago.
	They released this information.
	They have put Trump back on the Colorado Republican primary ballot.
	And this is good because I don't think, you know, when everybody was arguing over what happened with the 2020 election, I said, do you realize where the corruption begins?
	The corruption begins with who gets on the ballot.
	And now this has been taken to an all-new extreme in Colorado, in Maine, in Illinois.
	You know, to take somebody who...
	Because it was the Democrat and Republican parties that said, well, we're not going to have anybody on the ballot except us.
	And now the Democrats...
	Because this is like Highlander.
	You know, there can only be one.
	At some point in time, you've got to take out the other guy.
	At some point in time, the hero's got to take out Sean Connery.
	Because there can only be one.
	And this is Game of Thrones, is what this is.
	This is not that there's a good guy and a bad guy.
	It's just, you know, they want to be the one who rules them all.
	And so, as I pointed out, during oral arguments, even...
	Alina Kagan, appointed by Obama, one of the leftists there, said, I think the question you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States, she said, during the hearing for a lawyer for the six Colorado voters who sought to have Trump disqualified.
	Why should six voters be able to disqualify him as well?
	Say, I want to have an open ballot.
	I think we ought to have Trump on.
	I think we ought to have independent candidates.
	We ought to have third-party candidates.
	Let the voters decide.
	You know, no, no, no.
	We'll only have two. Maybe just one.
	I mean, take a look at... In Florida, the DNC, the Democrats, kicked everybody else off of the ballot except for Biden.
	This is North Korea-style elections.
	They got one candidate.
	And even he can't get 100% of the vote.
	People write in other stuff or whatever.
	So now he is on the ballot and they're not going to kick him off.
	And this is coming right before Super Tuesday tomorrow.
	So, again, this...
	And it should have been a slam dunk.
	Because... These people were trying to, in Colorado and Maine and Illinois, they were trying to keep him off because they said, well, 14th Amendment, insurrection, all this other kind of stuff.
	He hasn't been convicted of insurrection.
	But, you know, just accusing somebody now, in the Democrats' minds, that's how bad this has become.
	And Republicans have allowed this type of thing as well.
	You know, when we look at civil asset forfeiture, they can steal your property without even indicting you, let alone giving you a trial and finding you guilty.
	No, I just, I think that you did this, and so we're going to treat it as if we'd had due process in a trial.
	And again, Trump didn't do anything to stop any of that.
	As a matter of fact, he said, well, let's do that with gun owners.
	We'll take the gun and we'll do the due process some other time.
	Maybe. Right?
	And so they're all that way.
	They're all that way. And so the bullet points on this article from CNBC, again, goes back in and says...
	The U.S. Constitution says no person can serve as an officer of the United States who engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the U.S. after taking an oath of federal office.
	They're still trying to make the case, even though the Supreme Court has thrown it out.
	The key thing is that you've got to convict him and these other people of participating in an insurrection, or you don't have anything.
	And it was ludicrous.
	I always, I still think it's ludicrous that his people would say, well, we're going to say that he wasn't subject to the Constitution.
	He's not an officer of the United States and all, as president and all those kinds of things.
	It's like, well, I don't know.
	That seems to me to be a little bit too clever here to be true.
	So both sides wanted this to happen quickly.
	It's now been released, and so now that avenue has been closed down to the left in terms of opposing him.
	And as Wall Street Journal said, everything is going his way, except for the money.
	And we'll get to that in a moment.
	However, even though things are breaking his way politically and legally, He is still not secure enough in his victory.
	So he is out there trying to pander and run to the left.
	And so this was sent to me by a listener.
	This is Harry Hound on Twitter.
	And they sent me a tweet that was put out by Dustin Grage who said, I never want to hear anyone argue that Trump is pro-life ever again.
	He just says that he wants to federalize abortion again, which would nullify the heartbeat protections.
	This is what I've said. I said, you know, you got some places where, you know, they put the cutoff date at six weeks or eight weeks, which Trump said was too harsh.
	You federalize this, and everybody who's talking about it says, well, take it up to 15.
	You know, 15 is more than they allow in France, in liberal France.
	This is what Republicans are trying to do.
	So I said, first of all, that's a loss.
	Secondly, you know, New York is not going to pay any attention to this whatsoever.
	I was just going back and looking at the history of abortion laws.
	And, you know, it was in 1970.
	Now, Roe v. Wade was in 1973, but it was in 1970 that New York legalized abortion.
	And for the three years from the time, they were the first state to do it.
	They had, before they legalized abortion, they had the harshest abortion laws of any state in America.
	Longest prison terms and all the rest of this stuff.
	And then in 1970, spring of 1970, they legalized it.
	Governor Nelson Rockefeller could not wait to sign it.
	He immediately, as soon as it went through the Senate, and it was narrowly won in the House.
	In the Senate, they had a bit of a block, and they had to convince one guy to change his vote so they could get it passed in the Senate.
	As soon as that happened, he immediately signed it and got it activated.
	They had, in the three years, going from the most restrictive abortion law to legalizing it in New York, that brought in all these people from neighboring states into New York.
	It became ground zero for killing your kid.
	And they had over 400,000 abortions in those three years.
	65% of them were out of state.
	And so when you look at somebody from New York, like Donald Trump, somebody who prides himself On being a hedonistic, you know, sexualized playboy.
	That's where he was, hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein.
	Is it any surprise that he's doing this about abortions?
	But largely, they're coming in with a certain number of weeks.
	And the number 15 is mentioned.
	I haven't agreed to any number.
	I'm going to see. We want to take an issue that was very polarizing and get it settled and solved so everybody can be happy.
	Yeah. Doesn't that sound just like what he was saying with the Trump bump stock?
	But you have to be very, very powerful on background checks.
	Don't be shy. And don't worry about bump stock.
	We're getting rid of it. We can do this.
	We're getting rid of it. I'll do that myself because I'm able to.
	Fortunately, we're able to do that without going through Congress.
	Yeah. You see, his style of governing is not what the Constitution says.
	But it's, let's make a deal.
	I can do this. Let's do something everybody's happy with.
	So let's do something with abortion that everybody's going to be happy with.
	What a fool to even say something, an even greater fool to believe somebody like this.
	And as this was sent to me, they said, this scum Trump is negotiating how many weeks we're going to take to kill a baby?
	How many, you know, what age can we kill a baby?
	We're going to do something to make everybody happy.
	We're going to do something so I can win an election.
	That's what's called 40 Chess.
	That's why it was so obnoxious for Alex Jones to make that his catchphrase.
	Don't worry about Trump betraying his principles.
	He doesn't have any principles. Don't worry about him betraying his campaign promises.
	He doesn't care about promises that he made to his wives, and he doesn't care about promises he made to you.
	He doesn't care about his oath that he took to his wife.
	He doesn't care about his oath that he took to the Constitution.
	This guy is whatever works for him.
	A pragmatist without any principles whatsoever.
	That's where he is.
	Whether you're talking about guns or abortion or any other conservative issue, he's got one issue.
	Trump. Because he refers to himself in the third person.
	And then this.
	I said, these people are getting themselves worked up.
	Donald Trump is the greatest thing ever.
	The greatest president we've ever had in this country.
	Bannon is telling them.
	And they're all cheering at CPAC and all the rest of this stuff.
	They're getting themselves worked up.
	To have a civil war.
	Listen to this. This woman is glibly talking about war.
	And, you know, when you have Americans who have this kind of attitude, because we have no memory of what war is like, we have no experience of what war is like, it's something that we've watched on our TV sets.
	You know, we treat war as if it were a spectator sport.
	You know, you've watched all these people being shot on TV and in the movies and video games.
	It doesn't really matter, right?
	And we've got the mindset of a school shooter.
	You know, on an international level.
	That's our approach when it comes to wars.
	We hold life as dear as some school shooter does.
	Because we've been so desensitized with the fiction that we have consumed everywhere.
	And so this woman thinks that, you know, hey, Civil War would just be kind of like a spectator sport or something.
	I wouldn't be surprised if there was a revolution.
	What does that look like to you?
	Total mayhem.
	But I think it's going to be the only choice that some people see.
	They say Joe Biden wins the White House again.
	You don't believe that he actually does.
	How does Trump come into power then?
	It may be up to us.
	Is that a physical takeover of the White House?
	Could be. And it wouldn't just be the White House, it would be the country.
	The Pentagon. Sure.
	And do you think that human life could be a consequence of that?
	It could be. It's called collateral damage and the cost of war.
	I don't know what to say. These are conversations that last 15 minutes, Nicole.
	These are the parts that, when I talk about untangling all of this, when I said, okay, well, what does it mean to take over the country?
	She goes, well, you started in state government and you work your way towards Washington, right?
	This is so complex and so deep.
	And again, these are not one-off conversations, though.
	These are conversations that folks are engaged.
	I said, are you talking to your family about this, your neighbors?
	She goes, oh yeah, we are all ready for this moment.
	Yeah. Are you ready for this moment?
	Do you really think you're ready?
	You may think that you're ready, but you are not ready for what happens.
	Any student of history knows the naivete that is there with the beginning of these wars.
	Especially, look at our last Civil War.
	People on both sides, oh, this will be over in no time.
	They can't handle this.
	These people have no idea what they're doing.
	This is how dangerous they are.
	And this is why I talk about MAGA, and this is why I talk about Donald Trump.
	You've got to not put all of your hopes on one man and one office, because if you do, you will have a civil war.
	And that's what they want.
	And that's one of the reasons why the Democrats are doing this absurd process, because they want to build him up into some kind of a MAGA messiah.
	A physical takeover may be needed to get Donald Trump back into the White House.
	It's a civil war brewing.
	Well, it is in their minds, as a matter of fact.
	And so this is from some listeners, Jay and Jessica.
	I said, I've been working so hard for the last few years in local government to make a difference where I live.
	Even though I don't support the public education system, I know a majority of society is going to go through these institutions, so it seems worthy of my effort.
	And I absolutely agree with that.
	That's what Alex Newman said.
	He said, look... You got your kid in a burning building?
	You know, the school system.
	Get your kid out of that burning building.
	Then put the fire out.
	Because if you don't, it's going to burn down the rest of the neighborhood.
	The rest of the town. And that's exactly why you get involved with the local school board.
	Don't put your kids in there, by all means.
	But this thing is on fire, and it's going to destroy our communities if we don't, because the majority of kids are going to go through it.
	So he says, I know personally many board members, as I have helped to get them elected, even become friends.
	I door knock. I wave signs.
	I call campaigns.
	I get their petitions signed and the network.
	He says, but even as I try to avoid the Trump effect, On the larger stage, it keeps showing up here.
	And you send me this picture of this person who's running for school board.
	This guy, Chase Williams.
	And he's got pro-students.
	What does that mean? Pro-parents.
	Pro-taxpayers. And, real big, in a separate section, the only pro-Trump candidate.
	What is that about?
	You know, again, why, as he says, why does a school board official see it necessary to wrap themselves in Trump?
	Well, it's because of what the Republican Party has become.
	It's just, it's become this personality cult.
	This is far worse than, and I'm serious, it's far, you never, I saw this stuff happening with Obama, and I thought it was very worrying when I saw the left doing it.
	But now it's gone to a whole new level with Trump.
	I never saw people running for school board, for example, when Obama was there saying, you know, and I fully support Obama and all this kind of stuff.
	And we would have, if that had happened, we would have focused on that.
	You know, we focused on these kids dressing up in military uniforms and, you know, stomping around and talking about how Obama is this or that.
	And I That seems to be very threatening, and I can understand why people feel threatened when people are talking about civil war with Trump.
	I think that's stupid.
	I think it's very dangerous.
	And yet, this level of idol worship has surpassed even Obama with Trump.
	So, you know, maybe, you know, we're talking to people about local stuff, about school boards.
	Maybe this is the opportunity to try to get them to connect Trump to what he actually did in 2020.
	I always use the analogy of financial strings attached to all of this stuff.
	Maybe the people at the schools can understand that.
	Because that's the whole purpose of the Department of Education, the federalization of this.
	Let's give them money.
	Okay, you're addicted to the money.
	Feed the animals to pacify them, to domesticate them.
	And now that they're feeding out of your hand, now you tell them what you want them to teach, right?
	And that's exactly what Trump did with his executive order.
	You know, the real pandemic order began with the CEO of Eli Lilly, I talked about last week.
	Alex Azar, he put that out at the end of January, and then, you know, six weeks later, you had Trump do his executive order.
	That released the money.
	It was the money that kicked off all of these governors.
	But, of course, they'll all say, well, it was the governors, it wasn't Trump who did it, and it was the Democrat governors.
	They won't even, most of them won't even acknowledge the tyranny of the Republican governors.
	But it was the money. Just like it's the money from Washington that is pushing all this crazy stuff in the schools.
	I love what Jason Barker did.
	He sent this to me.
	He's got the evil clown.
	Clowns have become evil.
	There's a clown and he's got a MAGA balloon.
	And the bottom line there is vote harder this time.
	And, of course, if they don't get what they want, they're going to fight harder this time as well.
	That's the bad part of this, but I love the thumbnail that he did for his show.
	Vote harder this time.
	The problem is that it's not just clowns that are sinister.
	It's these Civil War MAGA clowns that are ones who are really, really sinister.
	And, you know, as you look at what happened in the aftermath, Look, Biden owns this persecution, this political persecution of January 6th.
	It's absolutely corrupt. And I'm far more concerned about what happened to the January 6th people than I am about what happened to Trump.
	Trump hasn't had any punishment at all.
	I mean, this financial thing could hurt him.
	That could be the punishment. But I don't think they're going to lock him up.
	They did, however, lock up a lot of January 6th people and gave them what essentially is life in prison for this stuff.
	They just had a Supreme Court ruling that threw out one of these enhancement charges.
	They came up with all kinds of ridiculous enhancements to this stuff to get people in jail.
	I mean, you look at Joe Biggs. He's in there.
	He didn't get violent with anybody.
	If he'd been violent with anybody, you know that they would have shown it.
	They featured him walking around with a smile on his face in the congressional hearings.
	And then they wanted to give him something like 33 years, and they gave him 17 instead.
	And now the DOJ wants to appeal that sentence, and they want to get their 33 years altogether.
	That's insane. That's absolutely insane.
	He's already served more time than he should have for anything that he did there.
	Far more time.
	These January 6th persecutions is what they are.
	That is 100% on Biden.
	But we all knew what was going to happen.
	We all knew that was going to happen to these people.
	And I say we all knew.
	Alex knew. He robbed them and sent them there.
	Trump knew. He robbed them and sent his supporters into that stuff.
	Made $250 million off of Save America.
	And he's still feeding off of that trough, even for his massive legal fees.
	As I pointed out, he's paying millions of dollars to Alina Habba.
	You supported Trump with Save America or Alex?
	I don't even know what Alex did with the money.
	Went into his purse, of course, for Stop the Steal.
	But the stuff that you gave to Trump, you see what he's doing?
	He's hiring this incredibly inept and competent lawyer, Alina Habba.
	She's so taken away.
	Well, I'd rather be pretty than smart.
	Well, I think she'd rather be rich.
	Than to be either pretty or smart.
	And she's getting rich off the contributions that people gave Trump to do something legally back in December of 2020, which he didn't do, by the way.
	And so we all knew about this.
	And, you know, you got some of these clowns who went there on January the 6th.
	Some of them were not dressed up like clowns.
	They were dressed up like military people.
	They were LARPing out there.
	Live-action role-playing.
	You know, you got the guy with the...
	They got helmets, and they got bulletproof vests, and they got the gloves with the knuckles in them and all the rest of the stuff.
	Shields, all the rest. I mean, you know, just ridiculous.
	But here is a journalist who is not doing any of this LARPing, okay?
	And he was just there to cover it.
	Steve Baker, working for Glenn Beck.
	And here's a video of him being taken out in handcuffs.
	Look at this guy. You know, he's 50, 60 something.
	And they're taking him out in handcuffs because he reported on this.
	Not allowed to have free press.
	This is the tyranny that Joe Biden is putting out there.
	And this is the other push that is taking us into a civil war when people see this kind of tyranny.
	Now, I don't know what Glenn Beck is going to do.
	Perhaps he will stand behind Steve Baker.
	Because, you know, we've already had this once.
	We had it with Sam Montoya, who worked for Alex as a photographer.
	Alex traveling around there in Washington on January the 6th with his entourage, as he always did.
	And when he saw this stuff happening, he ran to the other side of Washington and hung out at the Supreme Court.
	Except for Sam, who was actually doing the work of a journalist.
	Sam was actually filming what was happening with this historic moment.
	That's what a journalist is supposed to do.
	And that's what anybody should be able to do with free speech.
	You don't have to be some kind of a certified journalist, or you don't have to do this for a living.
	And instead, you know, they came after him.
	They arrested him. Alex was like, oh, don't worry, Sam.
	I'll take care of you. They fired him.
	Fired him. Just abandon him.
	Now, fortunately, Sam was under house arrest.
	He didn't get the kind of treatment in the prisons that these other people did.
	We'll have to see what happens with this guy.
	But I have a feeling that even Glenn Beck is going to give more support to his employees than Alex did.
	Almost everything is going Trump's way, says the Wall Street Journal, except financially.
	You know, who is he going to sell to this?
	Who's going to bail him out of this?
	And, you know, when we talk about competence, right?
	Is Trump competent? Is he competent?
	Can he even take care of himself, right?
	I don't think so.
	You look at all of this stuff that was going throughout his entire administration, all this Russiagate stuff, and he couldn't even defend himself adequately against that.
	And he's the commander-in-chief.
	He's the boss. Finally, he fired a couple of FBI guys.
	That's all he did. We're good to go.
	Trump knew this.
	Trump knew that Ingeron had already found him guilty and he was going to get a massive fine.
	As a matter of fact, what they were talking about, they upped it at the last minute.
	But it was in the neighborhood of what they're talking about here.
	And the fine, even if they had not upped it at the last minute, he still didn't have liquid assets prepared to pay for this.
	Instead, during the trial, he wanted to have this stuff thrown at him.
	Or he's just completely so oblivious and so arrogant that he thought something else was going to happen.
	I don't know. Which one of those, either one of those would be disqualifying.
	But he knows he's going to have 200 or 300 or, you know, 350 or whatever million.
	And he didn't try to sell anything or liquidate any assets or make any arrangements to get a loan.
	And now he's right up to the deadline on this stuff.
	And they're kind of panicking.
	Oh, well, you know what? And it's just hubris.
	Hubris from him. Hubris from his lawyer.
	No preparations with all this stuff.
	Absolute arrogance and incompetence that is here.
	And who's he going to get to loan him this money?
	You know, he got the Rothschilds to bail him out with the casinos.
	You know, Wilbur Ross was the Rothschild man there.
	And it's like, hey, look at this guy.
	Look at how you can work the crowds.
	Look at how they love him. And we could probably use that.
	And they bailed him out.
	Gave him, you know, changed the, he had borrowed more than half a billion dollars at 14% interest.
	He couldn't make any of this work.
	He got bailed out by the Rothschilds and immediately was in trouble again.
	He's an idiot. Trump was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.
	He's an idiot. He doesn't know how to run any of this stuff.
	He can't manage these casinos.
	Because of the size of his ego, he can't make any rational business decisions.
	And the same thing is true with this as well.
	So who's he going to go to? Is he going to get money from Big Pharma?
	Is he going to get it from some other interest that's out there?
	Is he going to get it from the Rothschild?
	Who's going to own him?
	Who's going to own him with this stuff?
	And again, I think he's going to win when he appeals this because it's such a ridiculous case.
	However, they're going to seize his buildings if he doesn't come up with the cash because he's got to have that cash to appeal it.
	So again, tomorrow is going to be Super Tuesday.
	That's all anybody's going to talk about is going to be the horse race aspect, not about any of the influence.
	And then it's going to be Biden and Trump.
	More reruns.
	Because, you know, both of these guys failed as president.
	They failed to even pretend to be bound by the Constitution and what they do.
	And I think it just shows, you know, whether we're talking about the pandemic MacGuffin or the climate MacGuffin, and I've seen people who are apologists for Trump.
	Oh, the Paris Climate Accord.
	He didn't end the Paris Climate Accord.
	He kept it for the entire four years.
	And he said at the beginning of his administration, well, I'll get rid of it, but I'll wait until after the 2020 election.
	Why? Why? You keep it there so that people keep pretending that it is binding.
	And then he got rid of it right after the election for two months.
	For two months, because Biden is going to put it back in.
	Because he'd lost the election.
	The whole thing was a scam.
	Even that was a scam. The pandemic was a scam.
	You understand that we have a globalist-occupying government.
	We have, I think we need to start calling it GOG. Globalist-occupying government.
	And then, of course, you got GOG and you got MAGA. It's sounding apocalyptic, isn't it?
	Kind of the American Armageddon here.
	Gog and Maga.
	So, Bablinby says, the Democrats are starting to panic as Biden is not dead yet.
	I like the comments of Ted Cruz, who said, what are they going to do?
	Something like, we came to Bernie.
	And that's really what they are doing with Biden.
	In lieu of Biden dying, Democrats, says the Babylon Bee, hope that he could be reasoned with to make way for a stronger candidate.
	We try to tell Joe that he's done great and it's time to move on, but he won't budge, said a Democrat strategist.
	We fed an elderly man literally gallons of ice cream every day.
	His arteries are half filled with chocolate chips.
	How has he not yet kicked the bucket?
	How? They say.
	Well, instead of that, he's putting out Jill, his wife, who is always referred to in the press as Dr.
	Jill. She's got a PhD in education.
	She is not a doctor.
	You know, that is something that really grates on a lot of MDs.
	You know, they'll make sure they'll emphasize by putting MD after their name instead of PhD.
	But I think, especially the way that they were pushing Dr.
	Jill during the pandemic at The View, the people at The View, so stupid, they really did think, I think, that she was a medical doctor.
	But what is she doing? Well, she is coming out to harangue Trump over the abortion issue.
	It's one of the reasons why I say, well, we're going to make everybody happy.
	We're going to see, I don't know, 15 weeks.
	I don't know. Maybe we'll do a different number of weeks before we rip the babies apart.
	She said, I've been so proud of how Joe's placed women at the center of his agenda.
	But Donald Trump, she said, and then they booed, he has spent a lifetime tearing us down, women, and devaluing our existence.
	Oh, wait a minute. You know what?
	In my lifetime, our society has been busy tearing babies apart and devaluing their existence.
	And it's people like Jill Biden and the Democrat Party who have been right at the center of all of that.
	Devaluating children, devaluating families, devaluating marriage, motherhood, all of this.
	That's what the Democrats have been doing.
	They've been devaluing it and ripping it apart my entire life.
	The campaign is looking to use a top surrogate to organize and mobilize female voters.
	She said, Donald Trump is dangerous to women and to our families.
	What families?
	What families? They don't want to get married.
	Last week, most women of a marriageable age now do not want to get married.
	They don't want to have kids. Men more than women want to get married.
	Men more than women want to have kids.
	Why? Because they have focused their massive propaganda machine on women from the mid-20th century on.
	And told them they want to be men.
	And they need to have a matriarchy.
	Get rid of the patriarchy. Let's have a matriarchy.
	Well, there's no virtue in a matriarchy over a patriarchy.
	They just don't like the plan that God put in, which goes back to the Garden of Eden.
	If they went back and they looked at that, it might put some things into perspective for them.
	It might kind of make sense.
	You know, it just wasn't pain in childbirth, but it was also the desire to rule over men.
	It was put in there as a frustration that was there.
	But not to have children, not to want children.
	It's one of the reasons why you see the birth rates dropping everywhere.
	But there's also physiological, chemical, other things like that.
	They're involved in there as well.
	They said, when our daughter, she went on to say, this is Biden again, Jill Biden.
	When our daughter's futures are at stake.
	What daughters? Right?
	What daughters? Planned Parenthood?
	They don't want... They're planning not to have any parenthood.
	They're planning not to have families.
	They're planning not to have daughters.
	That's what they're planning.
	Our country and its freedom hangs in the balance, says the woman whose husband did mandated lockdowns, who didn't care about my body, my choice, even when it really was only your body.
	He didn't care about your choice, your informed consent.
	And so we go back to MAGA and we look at what's happening on that side.
	The Guardian, taking a look at what Steve Bannon did.
	By the way, let me just get some of these comments here.
	Audi MRR, good to see you there.
	Good to see you there, Audi. Jailed for exercising his First Amendment rights.
	Police are useless when it comes to upholding their oath to the Constitution.
	They'll enforce an unlawful order in a heartbeat.
	That's absolutely true. You're right, Audi.
	They should have refused to arrest a journalist who was simply reporting.
	You know, what else is next?
	What is it that they're incapable of doing?
	Where will they draw the line?
	Well, they won't draw the line anywhere.
	They'll do as they're told, just following orders.
	About Trump and war.
	Solink Goy says, Trump, pro-gay marriage.
	He just had one in Mar-a-Lago.
	Sullivan, John Sullivan, I think a big conservative writer, somebody who's with the Lincoln Project.
	Pro-abortion, pro-executive order bans on gun rights.
	Pro-Zionist, what exactly does he stand for again?
	Yeah, what is it? That he wants that is conservative.
	Audi replies, and he says, Trump supporters are the quintessence of cognitive dissonance.
	That's absolutely right. Targeted individual says, that jab lady thinks she's in a Marvel movie.
	Yeah. Stephen Casper, we are on our way to a civil war no matter who wins the next election.
	I agree. That's what they're setting up.
	They want, again, you've got about a quarter of the country, you know, one quarter that is, two quarters I should say, half the country is ready for a civil war.
	Yeah, 25% of them are Democrats, 25% of them are Republican loyalists to that base, to those candidates, that party and everything.
	They're ready to fight, and that's 50% of the country.
	And the rest of us are looking at this and saying, what do we do?
	These idiots, how do we protect ourselves from them?
	We're on our way to a civil war, no matter who wins, said Stephen Kaspar.
	Beyond Hell says no one is ready for war.
	That's right. Tom McDog.
	David, if I recall, one of the first engagements during the Civil War had people come to spectate.
	Things don't change. We'll be the same now.
	Yeah, that's right. The first battle of Manassas, or as the left, the left.
	Because they were about central government folks.
	That's Lincoln. As a matter of fact, an alternative history, one from Harry Turtledove, that ended the war early, so all the major characters are still alive and didn't die.
	And Lincoln didn't get assassinated because he's run out of town on a rail, essentially.
	But he comes back. He has a political comeback a decade or two later as the leader of the Socialist Party.
	So, yeah, I say the left. But when they called it the Battle of Bull Run, And the Confederates called it the Battle of Manassas.
	And they had two battles there.
	So there was a first and second Manassas or a first and second bull run.
	The military leaders in the north understood the importance of rivers.
	So they would name these battles after rivers because that's how they could transport stuff.
	But it was there at Manassas.
	And they did. They had everybody show up to watch this thing as a spectator sport.
	Little did they realize just how horrific it was going to become.
	Nobody realized that.
	And they got a real taste of it, didn't they?
	Just amazing slaughter.
	And you think that, you know, they stood up like it was some kind of a duel.
	And, you know, line of thousands or tens of thousands of guys...
	At essentially point-blank range, just firing at the other side.
	And after they fired off the first volley, there's so much white smoke they couldn't see anything.
	So they're just firing, loading and firing blindly into the fog.
	And then taking the bullets as they come.
	Absolutely insane.
	That's war for you. But now we have perfected these killing machines.
	We still have the insanity that we had with the Civil War, but now they've got really precise weapons.
	It truly is amazing, and it makes me so angry to see people like, yeah, yeah, it's going to be Civil War, yeah, yeah, I know, yeah.
	Completely detached from reality.
	Gordon Schwamwe says, civil unrest guarantees our swift demise.
	Many enemies are waiting to capitalize off such, including multinational peacekeeping forces at our borders.
	Exactly right. Exactly right.
	So let's take a look at some of these scumbags who are stoking the fires of a civil war.
	Scumbags like Steve Bannon, as a matter of fact.
	Now, When he was at CPAC, this is what he had to say.
	...and destiny is to have the greatest political comeback in American history.
	And on November 5th, to drive the vermin out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
	Biden, you and your crime family are nothing but trash, okay?
	And on the 20th of January of 2025, we're going to take out the trash.
	Says a man who looks like he's homeless sleeping on a park bench every time you see him.
	Now, he's recycling Alex Jones.
	You and your crime family, you're trash.
	It's like, really? You stole that shtick from Alex Jones, and it didn't really go over too well when he was shooting his mouth off before January the 6th.
	You know, whatever it takes, we're going to get Biden out of that White House.
	Come with me. Meet me there, right?
	Yeah, right. These people, these Biden and Trump camp followers, you know, again, going back to the Civil War, they called them camp followers.
	They called who camp followers?
	Prostitutes. Prostitutes. Camp followers.
	Follow the army around.
	As a matter of fact, we get the label, Hooker, because General Hooker of the Union Army was one of the few generals who didn't like that.
	Most of them said, hey, get these prostitutes out of here.
	Run them away. Run them away. They didn't like that.
	He embraced it. He embraced the practice.
	He was friendly to them.
	He became a friend to the prostitutes, hence the name hookers.
	Hookers. And so we got these CPAC hookers.
	We got grifters like Steve Bannon, Mike Flynn, Jack Bosobian, Julie Green, the prophetess, right?
	All these people.
	And Bannon goes there and he's yelling and screaming about how Trump won.
	You know, just like Julie Green.
	Because he gave us three years of peace and prosperity before he was hit with a Chinese bioweapon.
	It's a Chinese bioweapon.
	See, it's a lab thing. They stole the 2020 election.
	Media, I want you to suck on this.
	I want the White House to suck on this.
	You lost in 2020.
	Donald Trump is the legitimate president of the United States.
	Trump won!
	Yeah. Well, you know, he's been milking that now for four years.
	And that was always the plan.
	You know, Tim Pool, when Luke Krodowski says, what about this vaccine thing and this lockdown stuff?
	I'm so tired of hearing about that, said Tim Pool.
	He did a thing four years ago, and that's all people want to talk about.
	I'm tired of talking about his vaccine and his lockdowns and all the rest of this stuff.
	Says Tim Pool, who, just like Bannon, can't stop talking about that election four years ago.
	But, of course, a couple of weeks before the election, The end of October, Bannon was talking to a Chinese audience of wealthy people brought around by his Chinese billionaire friend, Guo, who was part of the Chinese Communist Party,
	but run out of town, not because he's a good guy, not because he's some kind of Thomas Jefferson, but simply because it was a Game of Thrones, you know, just like with Donald Trump.
	And so here's this guy who's just shouting, Trump won!
	Trump won! Well, here's what Bannon was saying two weeks before the election.
	And what Trump's going to do is just declare victory, right?
	He's going to declare victory.
	But that doesn't mean he's the winner.
	He's just going to say he's the winner.
	He's just going to say he's the winner.
	That's right. The Democrats, more of our people vote early that count. Theirs voted in the mail.
	And so they're going to have a natural disadvantage. And Trump's going to take advantage of that. That's our strategy. He's going to clear himself a winner.
	So when you wake up Wednesday morning, it's going to be a firestorm.
	You're going to have a T for crazy, the media crazy, the courts are crazy.
	And Trump's going to be sitting there mocking tweet that you lose.
	I'm the winner. I'm the king. And he'll be all over. He'll be going, where's Hunter?
	Is Hunter on a crack pipe? I mean, no.
	He'll be... Because then it doesn't matter.
	Remember, here's the thing.
	After that, Trump never has to go to a voter again.
	He's going to fire raid the FBI direction.
	He's going to say, f*** you.
	How about that? Because he's never going to...
	He's done his last election.
	Oh, he's going to be off the chase.
	He's going to be crazy. Also, if Trump is losing...
	By 10 or 11 o'clock at night, it's going to be even crazier.
	No, because he's going to sit right there and say they stole it.
	I'm directing the Attorney General to shut down all ballot places in all 50 states.
	He's not going out easy.
	If Biden's winning, Trump is going to do some crazy stuff.
	Yeah, well, you know, here we are four years later.
	And if Trump gets elected a second time, he's not going to have to run for re-election.
	He is going to be off the chain, and he's going to do some really crazy stuff.
	And as Wes Robertson said, Bannon was a scriptwriter in Hollywood.
	Fitting. Seems like he wrote this script.
	I mean, he was talking about how they were going to claim that the election was stolen regardless.
	Yeah. You know, and I look at CPAC. Trump won.
	Trump won. Yeah. I always hated pep rallies in high school before the games.
	I had to go because I was in the band, you know, as required.
	And we would sit there and we would mock them, you know.
	They're getting a chair, you know, let's beat so-and-so.
	We're going to take the, you know, whoever the enemy of the week was.
	It was so Orwellian to me, you know.
	It's like, oh, this week we're going after Goldberg or whatever the guy was in 1984.
	And... We'd sit there and they'd do their chairs and we had our own chair.
	We'd yell out, make them bleed!
	It's just ridiculous.
	It was juvenile when we were in high school.
	These are people in their 60s who still have this high school pep rally mindset.
	And in addition to that, they're talking Civil War.
	They're crazy. They're crazy.
	These MAGA people are crazy.
	Stay away from them.
	Stay away from Bannon and Trump and Alex and Roger.
	All these people. They're crazy.
	They'll get you in jail for the rest of your life.
	They're another front in a civil war.
	As a listener pointed out, yeah, we've got these open borders and we've got people being brought in.
	They've got a lot of different things that got planned for us.
	And it's going to be a multi-crisis.
	And this is one of them.
	Bannon, 70 years old, is currently appealing a criminal conviction in a four-month prison sentence for defying a subpoena from the J6 committee.
	And so, again, as I point out in The Guardian, he's got a regular podcast called The War Room where he propagates false narratives about the 2020 election and coronavirus vaccines.
	But, you know, he... He's not going to point the coronavirus vaccines as being something from Trump.
	No, it was something that China did to us.
	It was the lab.
	It was the Wu flu. It was the China flu.
	And you see Bannon, and you see Infowars, and you see Breitbart, and you see even JFK Jr., RFK Jr., all of them, misdirecting people.
	The bioweapon was the vaccine.
	The vaccine bioweapon was put together by DARPA for a long time, working with Fauci and the rest of these people.
	That's the weapon.
	That's the weapon. And they don't want you to focus on that.
	So they want you to focus on China.
	Why? Well, because that's another one of the wars that they want to get us into.
	You know, not just infiltrate us with drug cartels or Chinese spies who can take out infrastructure and things like that.
	No, not just the Civil War either.
	They want to have a war with China as well.
	Bannon's tenure at the White House was short, says Guardian, and acrimonious.
	As he clashed with the President's daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared, who later described him as a toxic presence, accused him of undermining the President's agenda.
	Trump himself may have been piqued by how much media attention Bannon was receiving and eventually branded him Sloppy Steve.
	I think that that was it.
	I said that at the time.
	And I still stand by that.
	I think, you know, Saturday Night Live and everybody was doing these things where Bannon was the real brains of the operation and Trump was just a front.
	That's pretty close to the truth.
	It's just that Bannon wasn't the one controlling things.
	Trump was a front and he didn't want to be seen that way.
	And he didn't want to be upstaged by anybody because, again, he's the celebrity.
	He needs to be the star of this little reality TV show.
	That's why he fired Steve Bannon.
	Deconstruction of the administrative state, says Bannon, a radical downsizing of the federal government bureaucracy and an isolationist America First policy that would keep the country out of a third world war.
	I'm for all those things.
	I don't believe that Bannon or Trump are.
	As a matter of fact, we say, well, we're going to have an American isolationist policy to keep us out of a third world war.
	And yet, what is he doing? He's blaming all the pandemic stuff and the failure of Trump's administration on the Chinese.
	That's setting the ground for a war.
	If the Chinese did that to us in 2020, we ought to take them out.
	And because Trump did that to us in 2020, he needs to be taken out.
	He's the enemy. He's the fifth column.
	He's the spy who wears the uniform of your soldiers.
	But he's actually working for the other side.
	No, I would agree with deconstructing the administrative state, except Trump was over that for four years and didn't do it.
	Or a radical downsizing in the federal government, except Trump didn't do that either.
	And he didn't do anything to get rid of NATO. As a matter of fact, he goaded them into upping the ante.
	So that we could have the money for this war.
	So, again, you've got a guy with the Lincoln Project.
	Says, Bannon is a, if not the, primary spiritual and intellectual force of this nationalist movement that is now in control of the Republican Party.
	Can you trust him?
	And can you trust Trump?
	Over the weekend, we had Ivanka and Jared.
	Go to a lavish wedding in India, along with Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg and BlackRock's Larry Fink, Disney CEO Bob Iger.
	You see, it's a big club and you ain't in it.
	And be glad that you aren't.
	This is the globalist occupier government that is there.
	A three-day pre-wedding event.
	Big party. The son of Asia's richest man was getting married.
	And so, you know, this guy, the father, has got a chair of Reliance Industries, which is involved in energy, petrochemicals, retail, telecommunications, mass media, entertainment, textiles.
	And this is a...
	Again, just like you would have different royal families.
	Mary, right?
	Well, he is having his son, Mary, the daughter of the CEO of Encore Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Consumer Health.
	Viren Merchant.
	And so he's adding to his portfolio, to the family portfolio, pharmaceuticals and healthcare that he adds all those other things to.
	The guest list included about 1,200 Indian and international celebrities.
	Again, you know, Larry Fink of BlackRock, Canadian former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
	Ivanka Trump wrote on Instagram on Friday that she had a magical evening.
	Isn't that nice? Magical evening.
	And I guess it helped that Disney's CEO was there, sprinkling fairy dust everywhere.
	Zuckerberg also posted photos and talked about it on Instagram, of course.
	They were entertained by pop star Rihanna, who was paid between $8 and $9 million for her performance.
	Again, just be glad that you are not involved with those people.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	♪♪ And now, the David Knight Show.
	Well, a Syrian girl says after sending all of our manufacturing to China, how can we go to war with them?
	Where will our industrial support to back a war come from?
	Oh, wow. See, they're not planning on winning this war.
	They want the war, but they don't want to win the war.
	As a matter of fact, I think they do have a plan, though.
	We have the god of pronouns on our side.
	And if you want to know just how bad things are, it's much worse than losing our industrial base.
	We have lost our minds.
	Here is Corporal Klinger from Trump's Space Force.
	All too often, I hear leaders talk about providing with dignity and respect like it's an aspirational goal.
	He's got earrings on.
	That's not good enough. Dignity and respect is the bare minimum.
	It's the floor of where we can be.
	We must set our sights higher and We're in so much trouble.
	Because there are still far too many people out there, not just LGBTQ individuals, that feel marginalized, shut out, or discriminated against.
	So for all of you out there, I ask you to set out your symbols of pride, share your pronouns in your emails.
	What are these guys thinking?
	If you're a person who doesn't think they need to.
	Initiate difficult conversations about racial and gender barriers and share a bit of your vulnerability in a way that draws others in.
	You all have the power to take intentionally inclusive actions to ensure the multiple perspectives that we know make us stronger as we devise winning warfighting strategies get heard.
	As my son said, it must be hard to do that voice all day.
	Zero Hedge commented on that and said, Russia and China tremble.
	Now, they're just trying to hold the laughter in, you know, instead of just letting it go in a war.
	They're kind of shaking as they're trying to hold that laughter in.
	Well, let's take a quick look, though, at some of the money behind this, some of the pharmaceutical money behind this.
	You know, Nikki Haley, I guess, fresh off of this heady win in Washington, D.C., said, I don't know if Trump would follow the Constitution in a second term.
	I know. He won't.
	He didn't follow it in his first term.
	Of course, he's not going to follow it in his second term.
	He doesn't have to stand for voters.
	He's going to be, as Steve Bannon said, off the chain.
	Yeah, he escaped that chain in his first term, as Patrick Henry said.
	Trust no man, but bind them down with the chains of the Constitution.
	Well, Trump was off the chain.
	He wasn't bound down with any constitutional chains in his first term.
	Of course, he's not going to be doing that.
	And by the way, neither would Nikki Haley.
	She would not follow the Constitution.
	She's already made that clear.
	Do you think Donald Trump would follow the Constitution if he were elected to a second term?
	Let me ask you this. Do you think he'd be faithful to his wife if he got married a fourth time?
	I don't think they'd do that either.
	So, yeah. So, how the family fortune behind a major American pharmaceutical company has quietly funded conservative causes.
	You see, we look at this and we say, well, why isn't anything being done about these people?
	We're not even having a show hearing like they are in the UK. And, of course, the inquiry that they're doing in the UK is nothing more than window dressing.
	Nobody's going to get any trouble.
	Nobody's going to be disciplined. Nobody's going to be found guilty of their crimes against humanity, their mass murder plans.
	None of that's going to happen in the UK. But, you know, at least they have the decency to put up a front, I guess.
	We don't even have the decency to do that.
	With all of the dog and pony show hearings that Jim Jordan and Senator Kennedy and all these Republicans do all the time, they don't even have the decency to do this.
	Even pretend to care.
	And as I said all along, well, it's because these guys are making money off of pharmaceutical companies.
	They're getting paid by them. They also were partners in the murder at the time that it happened.
	Just like murder on the Orient Express, the Agatha Christie thing, where all of the suspects stuck the knife in the person that they killed.
	They all took a turn at the stabbing.
	And they've all done that to us.
	Murder on the Warp Speed Express.
	And so, of course, they're not going to do anything about that, but it gets even broader.
	You know, you had an astonished Tucker Carlson.
	You had a guy come on and he goes, you know, when Pfizer is running all these different ads, they're not doing it.
	Yeah, they're not doing it because they think that the people are going to buy their product, right?
	They're doing this because they're buying influence with the network.
	Because, you know, if you're making $25 million a year, he didn't explain it this way, he didn't personalize it to Tucker, but if Tucker's making $25 million a year, he's not going to come out against Pfizer and these other big corporate sponsors of his program.
	He knows better than that.
	They eventually fired him, but they fired him because he was going to cost them money with a lawsuit over this Ray Epps thing.
	And look, it doesn't matter whether Ray Epps was a Fed or not.
	Even if Ray Epps was everything that Darren Beattie at Revolver claims that he was.
	And Darren Beattie had made those claims about Oath Keepers President Stuart Rhodes, about Enrico Terrio, who was with the Proud Boys.
	And it was believable with Enrico Terrio because he had a history of being an informant.
	Nevertheless, Darren Beattie said, oh, these guys were, you know, provocateurs, and they set this whole thing up.
	They're not going to put them in jail.
	They got the longest sentences of anybody, and he never did a retraction about that.
	Never did a retraction.
	And so Darren Beattie focused on re-ups because he wanted to misdirect people away from Tucker, away from Alex, and away from himself, quite frankly, and other people who had pushed this January the 6th thing, Stop the Steal and Save America.
	And so Ray Epps was the scapegoat.
	We've got to have a scapegoat that's out there to distract you from the Judas goats who led people to the slaughter.
	And again, even if Ray Epps was an FBI agent, he didn't do nearly as much as Trump and Alex and Tucker and all these other people to push what happened on January 6th.
	They didn't go there because they heard Ray Epps on TV. They went there because they heard all these other guys.
	And so he focuses on that to misdirect people.
	And, you know, all of this stuff, but we're supposed to believe that Tucker never really, it just dawned on him when the guy said that.
	You mean that's why I was being quiet?
	About Pfizer.
	No, he got fired because he had attacked REPS, and they were worried about yet another one of these lawsuits and what disclosure is going to show about all that and everything, so they fired him for that.
	But then it's not just the media and the Republican and Democrat politicians who are part of this.
	It was also the conservative think tanks who, by the way, have, as I pointed out for years since 2018, I've been pointing out that the biggest conservative and libertarian think tanks have supported censorship by the Silicon Valley social media cartels and stuff.
	And so this article is from CNN, how the family fortune behind a major American pharma company has quietly funded conservative causes.
	They have a problem. You know, if you got Pfizer funding Anderson Cooper, that's not a problem.
	But hey, if they give money to conservative causes, that's a problem.
	And so they talk about the Searle Freedom Trust.
	So this is G.D. Searle Pharmaceutical Company.
	They came up with drugs like Ambien and Dramamine and things like that.
	Made a lot of money. They've doled out more than $200 million in grants over the last decade, sending more money to conservative nonprofits than to nearly any other private foundation in recent years, according to a CNN analysis.
	So they're just worried that they're not getting their fair share.
	Because, you know, Big Pharma typically spreads the money around between CNN and Fox and MSNBC and all the rest of these people so they can control the news.
	Following the wishes of its founder, the trust is now going to close down in 2025, and they're planning to award most of the last major grants in 2024.
	That means a potential windfall during a key election year for groups that push conservative policies as of the beginning of 2023.
	According to the most recent tax return, the trust had more than $59 million left to spend.
	This is small potatoes compared to Soros and some of these other ones.
	And it is interesting that this is replicated over and over again in orders of magnitude bigger by foundations that have been taken over by left-wing causes.
	But they focus on this because they're worried that they're going to be funding the conservatives and they probably will.
	While several of its top beneficiaries are think tanks that have focused on economic policy and loosening government regulations, others have worked to weaken child labor laws, advocate for stricter voting rules.
	Why wouldn't we? Why wouldn't we want to know who's voting?
	To gut affirmative action policies, to push climate change denial.
	You get the idea. And so, they said, they're even giving money to one of these foundations that's helping to craft policy issues for Trump administration.
	Don't worry, CNN. He's not going to follow any of this stuff.
	Just like with healthcare, right?
	Obamacare was a big part of the 2016 thing.
	It was healthcare and it was a border.
	We're going to fix Obamacare.
	And he had a great program that some think tank had done for him.
	And I remember going down that and said, this is excellent.
	Look at this. If they actually do it.
	Well, it immediately was deep-sixed down the memory hole as soon as Trump got elected.
	He never talked about it as a candidate.
	That's what I said at the time. I don't know if he's going to do this or not.
	He doesn't campaign on any issues like this.
	He's going to be controlled by other people.
	So are the people controlling him?
	Are they going to push this thing through?
	Because he doesn't talk about it as a candidate.
	So I don't really think it's an issue that is dear and near to his heart.
	He didn't even do anything about the border.
	The border is still wide open because he didn't build a wall, didn't do anything.
	But now he's going to do something about it, supposedly.
	Anyway, Big Pharma also bankrolled conservative groups, a pushed industry message to Trump, show the tax returns.
	This goes back to 2019.
	We're going to go back... In reverse order here.
	Just to show you how the money flows to the president or to the party.
	And then you have the executive orders or the legislation from the senators.
	And then the money flows down to the governor to the states with this pandemic thing.
	And so, pharmaceutical industry's largest trade association in 2019, just before this stuff hit, gave millions of dollars in grants to a number of conservative groups.
	The influential Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and they have their little acronym that they have there, is PHRMA. P-H-R-M-A. PHRMA. That's what they call their lobbying group.
	It represents the most powerful drug companies in the country.
	Already one of the top lobbying spenders.
	And so, you know, they're giving tens of millions of dollars to all these different candidates.
	This is one of the reasons why, throughout all of this lockdown pandemic and throughout all the vaccine stuff, you had silence from the conservative think tanks, just like you had silence from Fox News and from CNN and MSNBC. And if they weren't silent, they were cheering it on.
	You see, pharma bought the news media, but they also bought the conservative think tanks out there.
	Among other conservative groups pharma gave to last year, Consumer Action for a Strong Economy, FreedomWorks.
	FreedomWorks got $100,000.
	Now, you know, FreedomWorks, back in, I think it's 2009, 2008, when they're getting started, they had a contest.
	I was doing a lot of contests at that time.
	That's how I wound up working at Infowars.
	And FreedomWorks had a contest about entrepreneurship.
	And, um... And I won the contest and they flew Karen and I to Chicago.
	We had a great time and got to meet Dick Armey, who had been the Republican leader when he was in Congress.
	And that was his thing.
	And then, you know, they had a lot of infighting and jostling of positions and everything.
	And he was out not too long after that.
	And again, don't write me about Dick Armey.
	I don't... But I mean, you know, he was a nice guy, and he started this thing.
	It could have been bad from the very beginning, but here's where they are.
	$100,000 from the pharmaceutical companies, and then when 2020 hits, zip the mouth, right?
	They're closed. Nothing to say.
	Nothing to say. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, CEI, had a lot of dealings with them as well.
	They got money as well.
	The Taxpayer Protection Alliance.
	These are people that are getting paid off by the pharmaceutical industry.
	And, of course, they're going to keep quiet about this pandemic stuff.
	FreedomWorks has even run digital ads using the rejection of, quote, the socialist rate-setting scheme, unquote.
	Fighting for pharma-favored provisions in Trump's proposed trade deal.
	This is in 2019.
	The conservative Heritage Action for America got $37,500 from pharma last year.
	Now, these are really kind of small potatoes, but again, it's a big donation for these organizations, I'm sure.
	Then, take it back another two years, 2017, as Trump is coming in.
	When it comes to pharma donations, Trump was with the elephant in the room.
	This is from Stat News.
	Stat News is a pharmaceutical trade publication.
	But they actually seem to be pretty independent.
	And, you know, they will criticize the pharmaceutical industry when it's necessary, but they also cheerlead all the pharmaceutical stuff like, oh, this is the next big thing and it's going to cure everything, that type of stuff.
	But they were the ones who broke the news about how Pfizer was blackmailing Brazil, Argentina, and a third Latin American country that they declined to allow their name to be used because they had...
	Agreed to the blackmail deal from Pfizer over the vaccines.
	So that was Stat News that did that.
	Stat News in October of 2017 shows a picture of Trump and of Mitch McConnell.
	And it says, when it comes to pharma donations, Trump was with the elephant in the room.
	Meaning the big guy is getting all this, is Mitch McConnell.
	They said at the time, Congress, the pharmaceutical industry has lots of money and doesn't hesitate to spend it on Congress.
	Trump said they contribute massive amounts of money to political people.
	And he had Mitch McConnell there by his side.
	Can you show him the picture there?
	I think they got a picture of it there.
	Yeah, there he is. And he says, I don't know, Mitch, maybe even you.
	And Mitch McConnell lets out a short laugh.
	Yeah, he is one of the biggest, if not the biggest.
	As a matter of fact, Pelosi's on the take, Schumer's on the take, McConnell's on the take, and Trump himself is on the take.
	Boy, talk about the elephants in the room.
	The big guys, all the big guys at the top, you know, millions of dollars for them.
	Big Pharma's big donations to the 2016 presidential candidates.
	Now, we'll go back a year before this that I just showed you.
	And this is a time when, oh, this is CNN, writing about Martin Scarelli saying, Who, as he raised the, you know, he bought that drug company, he immediately raised the price of one of the drugs by 5,000%.
	By the way, Trump doesn't have any problems with pharmaceutical people.
	He doesn't have any problems with people like Martin Scarelli because, you know, Vivek, the snake, Ramaswamy.
	He wanted to bring Martin Skreli in as a partner after all this stuff broke.
	After. And the other people who were with him said, no way, you know.
	Don't bring that skunk in here.
	He absolutely was shameless, Vivek Ramaswamy.
	That's his type of guy, Martin Skreli.
	At the time when Trump was running, he was criticized by Donald Trump.
	He called Skreli a, quote, spoiled brat.
	He said he ought to be ashamed of himself.
	Now he's going to, he's talking about, you know, making another Martin Scrooge clone into his VP running mate.
	And so, at a time, the companies spent, according to the FEC, they said, you know, $951,000.
	The biggest recipient was Hillary Clinton.
	She got about a third of that in the donations.
	And Trump got the least in donations at that time.
	He only got, they said, $1,010.
	Hillary Clinton got $336,000.
	They said Trump only got enough to buy one of these Martin Scarelli pills, $1,000.
	But things changed very rapidly as he won the election.
	Trump was, as he wins the election, and remember, he campaigned as a skeptic about vaccines, hinted, hinted, that maybe autism was connected with him again.
	This is the game that's played by Tucker, the game that's played by Alex, you know, just hint this stuff out there.
	And so he played that game.
	And then he said, I don't want their money in the 2020 campaign.
	Because they didn't give it to him.
	Because they didn't think he was going to win.
	They gave it to Hillary. They didn't give to my campaign.
	I don't want their money, he said.
	They gave to a lot of other campaigns, and that's the problem.
	But I couldn't care less.
	They've got to do what's right.
	And so then they started giving him money.
	And, you know, Hillary Clinton had received $2.6 million from the Center for Responsive Politics.
	They gave, and this is another pharmaceutical organization, they don't just have one organization that showers politicians with money.
	They have multiple ones that they've set up for the different corporations to stuff their money into and launder it through these political action committees.
	You know, they can't give it directly to the candidate, but they can give it to these political action committees.
	And they can give it to their inauguration committees as well.
	And so, once he was elected, Trump's inauguration committee received a million-dollar check just from Pfizer.
	Pfizer. Isn't that interesting?
	They were the ones, the company that gave him the most money for his party, his inauguration balls and stuff.
	And we know that DARPA and the Pentagon had been working with Moderna for quite some time to set up this mRNA thing.
	MRNA was where Moderna hung out.
	As a matter of fact, it was originally pronounced as mode RNA, and then they changed it to Moderna.
	Monsef Slaoui, who was really close friends with Fauci, They did all the speaking tours together, all the pharmaceutical trade tours together.
	They were buddies from a long time ago.
	They collaborated on a previous rushed vaccine that came out, the swine flu thing.
	Pandemics, they collaborated on that.
	So this whole thing was set up for Moderna.
	But then Pfizer kicks in with a million dollar contribution to Trump after he gets elected.
	Somehow then, They get moved to the front of the line.
	I wonder who did that.
	Was it Fauci who was connected to Monsef Slaoui?
	Even when they did that little thing there where they said, well, Trump went around the table and they had all the people lined up to show.
	How long is it going to take you?
	That's too long. How about you?
	No, that's still too long.
	It's better. But how about you?
	Now, the last one that they had, they were all decreasing in time.
	It was all so ranged.
	It was Moderna. They said, we can do it right now.
	And Fauci was right there, grinning.
	He made Monsef Slaoui, their CEO, made him the head of Operation Warp Speed and all the rest of this stuff.
	But then Pfizer got leapfrogged in there.
	They were the ones who gave the most money to Trump.
	I think that's kind of interesting.
	Trump went on to blast the industry for routine price hikes and aggressive litigation.
	He said the companies were, quote, getting away with murder.
	He said that in January 2017, three years before he got away with murder.
	Despite the tough talk, when the Trump administration unveiled its blueprint for tackling drug prices in 2018, one analyst called it very, very positive for the industry.
	You see, Trump just wanted more money.
	And this is a pattern.
	You publicly criticize this industry over here, or you publicly criticize NATO or whatever.
	You keep giving them the money, or you get the money from them or whatever.
	In the case of Pfizer, you keep giving NATO the money.
	But nothing changes.
	But the base thinks that it all changed because he criticizes these people.
	And we've seen Trump do this over and over again with all these different issues.
	And when it comes to one of these drug companies like Pfizer or the pharmaceutical industry, he's doing this game just to get his price up.
	And that's what he did with RFK Jr.
	But his base thinks he actually opposes these people.
	In July 2018, Trump directly blasted Pfizer for a round of price hikes, saying on Twitter that Pfizer should be ashamed that they've raised drug prices for no reason.
	But then came the payoff.
	When, you know, they gave generously to his inauguration, and it was Pfizer, people like Abbott Labs who got the contracts for putting out these useless PCR tests and other things like that.
	Trump's inaugural committee raised $107 million, more than twice as much as the previous record from Obama.
	He made $53 million.
	You know, when you look at these people, They're making $200,000 or $400,000 or whatever, whether you're talking about Nancy Pelosi or Mitch McConnell.
	How do they wind up with fortunes of hundreds of millions of dollars, nearly billionaires?
	How do they wind up with that, you know?
	Stop and think about that.
	How do you go from making a $200,000, you collected this salary of $200,000 as a Speaker of the House or the Senate leader all these different years, and now all of a sudden you're nearly a billionaire?
	How does that work out? Is that plausible?
	Let's just take three zeros off of this.
	And let's say that you're making, instead of $200,000 a year, you're making $200,000 a year.
	And then you're going to become a, not a billionaire, but a millionaire.
	How do you do that? How do you become a millionaire making $200 a year?
	A year. Well, how do you become a billionaire making $200,000 a year?
	There's something else going on there, isn't there?
	Those numbers add up. I mean, we talk about million and billion.
	It's like, oh yeah, it's so big, of course it'd be a billionaire.
	No, no, no. Take off some of those zeros.
	You're making $200 a year, and now all of a sudden, you're a multimillionaire.
	Okay, so no health company gave more to Trump's event than Pfizer.
	His profits for several high-priced medicines could come under pressure if the Medicare program for seniors was allowed to negotiate on cost, as Trump had campaigned on.
	Pfizer's CEO was also a vocal advocate for cutting corporate income taxes, which Trump had pledged to do, and he actually made good on that.
	He gave the corporation so much money that Apple was embarrassed when he rewrote the tax code.
	They got the windfall from it.
	Pfizer's million-dollar donation entitled it to four tickets to a leadership luncheon with select cabinet appointees, you know, the people from Goldman Sachs and other places like that.
	According to a solicitation brochure obtained by the Center for Public Integrity, Pfizer also got an entree to the Pence inaugural dinner.
	Both companies had access to balls, receptions, luncheons, concerts, and other events that were not available to lesser donors.
	And so then, after all this stuff happens, we see how they got paid off.
	And yet, in 2020, who did the fickle pharmaceutical people really get behind?
	Well, they got behind Biden.
	You could look at it and you'd say, well, maybe they didn't think Trump was going to win, or maybe they really wanted to change horses here so they could take it to the next leg of this.
	Republican candidates have received 64% of pharma industry contributions since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
	This is why this story that I began with from CNN was interesting.
	It's not just the Democrats.
	64% has gone to the GOP. Another reason why they won't call for any inquiry into this stuff.
	You know, Rand Paul bought stock in Gilead, people who made remdesivir.
	Except he had his wife buy it.
	And then he grills Fauci over the Wu flu.
	You know, supposedly the gain of function created this supposed pandemic.
	More misdirection.
	Misdirection to get people to not understand that he's buying the stock, his wife is buying it.
	Misdirection away from the pharmaceutical bioweapon to this imaginary bioweapon out of China.
	So donors with links to drug companies have donated $2.5 million to the Biden campaign in the last election, 2020.
	Significantly more than the $647,000 they gave to Trump's re-election campaign.
	But Trump was doing everything he could to hold them up.
	It wasn't that he was criticizing them.
	I mean, he had just given them the...
	And think about what this buys, right?
	Pfizer gave him a million dollars, more than any of the other companies did, for his inauguration thing.
	They give him a million dollars.
	He turns around, he gave them two billion dollars three years later to develop this vaccine.
	That had already been developed, you know, with Moderna and DARPA. But he gives this to Pfizer to help them catch up.
	He gave them 2,000 times the amount that they gave him.
	2,000 times.
	There's no return on investment like a politician.
	And so they gave him a million.
	He gives them two billion.
	Says, go make a warp speed vaccine that you won't be held responsible for whatever it does.
	And then they wind up making $347 billion and selling that.
	But he gave them the two billion dollars to do it.
	Paid all their development, all their R&D costs and everything.
	All they had to do was give him a million dollars.
	This is how this works.
	Yeah, yeah, it's not Trump at all.
	Well, let me play for you.
	Catherine Austin Fitz, who, again, this is Greg Hunter with USA Watchdog.
	And he wants to make excuses.
	Trump really didn't know what he was doing, and she's not buying any of this.
	Oh, he didn't know? Well, then why are you supporting him if he's that stupid?
	I don't think that he's that stupid, she said.
	This is going on while the Hunter Biden laptop has now been exposed for exactly the crime scene that it is.
	They're still going after Donald Trump, who wants to destroy the New World Order.
	I mean, I had Alex Newman on.
	He says, you know, I know you would disagree about the shots and all that, but boy, he was taking a sledgehammer to the New World Order.
	He got us out of the Paris Climate Accord.
	He got us out of Well, but wait a minute.
	He put $10 billion into a military program to depopulate Americans.
	Come on, Greg. I'm going to be a tough guy about this.
	He didn't get us out of the Paris climate either.
	The truth, though, I mean, Birx came out on Fox and said, I always knew the mRNA injections would not offer, you know, much protection against infection.
	She came out and said that. And Neil Cavuto's like, you can Google this.
	So if you look at the history of what is known, it takes $10.
	Everybody knows that.
	You know, come on.
	You actually think Donald Trump actually knew, hey, we're going to depopulate and murder off a bunch of people?
	I don't. I think he was live, too, and he missed this.
	He knows now.
	If there was one person who understood how dangerous vaccines are that was in political life, it was Donald Trump.
	Because this was a big issue during about, you know, the dangers of vaccines.
	So he knows. So you think he knew ahead of time?
	You think he knew, go into it, that we're going to defopulate people?
	See, I just don't believe that. I think he knows now.
	I think he definitely knows now.
	Which I'm pissed that he's not coming out.
	So I'm just going to be a tough guy because I knew the injection program stunk.
	I knew it was dangerous.
	And I knew there were different nefarious agendas that could go on.
	When the virus started, or as soon as they claimed there was a virus, because I think it was more than one thing going on, I said, don't worry about COVID. Worry about the injection.
	Don't take the injection, whatever you do.
	So if I knew that in March 2020, I'm sure Trump knew that.
	So no, $10 billion?
	He put in charge of Operation Warp Speed, someone who was head of research at a pharmaceutical company, Here's the problem.
	You can say Trump was on board for a depopulation or Trump got rolled.
	Either one is not a very good case to be made that he ought to be president.
	I just can't believe that he would say, sure, let's kill millions of people.
	I just have a hard time believing that, especially when Birx writes a book.
	But go back, then you're saying he's incompetent.
	Because if I knew what I knew, you know, don't tell me I knew more than Trump.
	I just don't buy that.
	I'm not saying that you're wrong. I'm just saying, oh, that's depressing.
	You've got to hold people accountable.
	You've got to tell the truth and you've got to hold people accountable.
	That's the only way out of this.
	And Biden is a big fat, huge smoke and steaming bag of crap.
	Here's the thing. The president is not running the situation.
	The president is not in charge.
	That's what you've got to understand.
	And, you know, I keep talking about...
	Explain that. The president is like, please, so we explain that.
	Well, he's the president. Why isn't he in charge?
	Explain what... What happened in 1963?
	What happened in November 1963?
	Kennedy was shot in the head.
	Well, the US intelligence agencies and military and establishment got together and killed the president, right?
	That's right, yeah. And who controls the Secret Service, right?
	It's the Secretary of the Treasury and the people who run the country.
	So the deep state controls the Secret Service and their guns point out and their guns point in.
	You know, the president, in a highly centralized system, the president has very little power.
	Now, I've told you the red button story many, many times, but the moral of the story of the red button story, if you go to Solaria, you go on the web, you can do a search of the red button story in my name and you'll pull it right up.
	But essentially what it says, everybody in America wants their check.
	And the way they get their check is to borrow more money and print more money.
	And so you've had a lot of popular support for the financial coup.
	And the reason is everybody wants their check.
	Now, you put the president in charge, you hit the population with massive amounts of propaganda, disinformation, entrainment.
	Suddenly they're screaming they want a vaccine, right?
	And you're Trump, and you feel cornered and squeezed by the fact that everybody wants their check.
	And the only way you can get their check is to be nice to the deep state and the central bankers.
	And the only way you can make them happy is to give them whatever the entrainment and TV has persuaded them they want.
	You think that he ordered the deal, this thing, and he had a trade-off.
	And the trade-off was, well, you get your check, but some of you are going to die.
	You know something? I have no idea what was going on.
	And I don't care.
	Because you had the president roll out something that in March 2020, I was sure was going to harm and kill millions of Americans.
	And he either has two reasons for doing it.
	He's incompetent.
	Or he is breaking the law.
	Which do you want? I don't know.
	I wasn't there, I can't say.
	But I know what I knew, and I know what I hold him responsible to know, and I know what he did.
	And I know what I would have done.
	I would have taken a bullet in the head before I would implement a calling of the American population.
	Of course, we have to lay some blame squarely at Biden's.
	You have a vaxxer job and mandates and forcing this shit, which Trump wouldn't have done.
	That's what he says anyway.
	We're not talking about...
	We're talking around in a box where there are no solutions.
	And we have to go to where we can get power and implement real solutions.
	So just remember, I just want to make this clear.
	In October 2019, when everybody in America was being entertained by the teenage sex life of the Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh, The House, the Senate, and the White House, Democrat and Republican, both sides of the aisle, got together and approved Statement 56 of the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, which said that they could keep secret books.
	That was everybody together.
	Okay, so there is no right versus left.
	There is no Trump versus Biden.
	There is a machine in control of a spending machine that is financed with our taxes and debt borrowed in our name that is being sold into our pension funds and into our retirement accounts.
	There is that machine and that machine She is 100% right.
	Every time she would say, but Biden is a stinking pile.
	But Biden forced this stuff, which, of course, most of the coercion was done through private companies.
	And it was done by him saying, well, I pay you and I'm going to stop paying you if you don't get the same thing that Trump did when he wanted his lockdowns and all the rest of this stuff.
	I'm paying you to do this bribery.
	Blackmail. It's always the money.
	And so we've got to think outside the box.
	We've got to think outside the ballot box, right?
	We've got to understand all these people focused on voting machines.
	Catherine Austin Fitz is focused on the spending machine.
	The spending machine.
	And the spending machine dazzling people with these pieces of paper so that you keep pulling the lever like some kind of doped-up rat.
	While they work on how they're going to eradicate us.
	It's all about the depopulation.
	The money is there and the love of the money is there just to distract you, to addict you.
	And he can't see that.
	And I think perhaps he doesn't really see it.
	I mean, he sincerely seems to be caught up in this stuff.
	But again, do you want to talk about what a stinking pile Biden is and how he's worse even than Trump?
	But, you know, because he tried all these different things and it didn't work.
	So let's talk about that.
	Let's talk about what does not work and what will work.
	And let's try to think outside of the box that they try to put us in.
	By the way, I want to say this.
	My son, Whistler, is doing the board today, not Travis.
	He said to tell Trump burger forever.
	I muted him by mistake, and I can't undo it for the live stream.
	So you'll be unmuted next live stream.
	It wasn't anything intentional, just to let you know.
	And I have a letter here before we run out of time.
	This is to make this all personal, this depopulation stuff.
	Listen to this. This is from Dusty.
	A long-time listener to the show said, Last week, my older brother went into the hospital for what was an enlarged spleen.
	The doctor said it was the largest they'd seen in nearly 30 years, and they were planning to remove it.
	His white blood cell count was 317,000, 31 times greater than the high of 10,000 that they look for.
	He underwent leukophoresis to filter out the white blood cells and bring the count down.
	They're hoping that a spleen will reduce in size and not need to be removed.
	By the way, the spleen was the greatest area of concentration for this Trump genetic poison.
	Anyway, he's currently being treated for leukemia, has bone marrow biopsy scheduled today to find out how bad it is.
	Being treated at the University of Michigan Hospital in Michigan.
	My brother took the initial two doses a couple years ago, received a booster last fall.
	After the first two doses, he developed unexplained rashes.
	Since then, he's had several bouts of illness that laid him up for days at a time.
	Now he is undergoing cancer treatment at only 38 years old.
	He is the only one of us four siblings who took the jab.
	Prayers for my brother and for our family would be much appreciated.
	As shocking as this is to us, it is likewise unsurprising.
	Because we knew the risks and we tried to warn him before he ever took the first.
	And you know, when we look at this, I think it has a parallel to abortion.
	We don't hate the people who have been lied and deceived into taking the jab or lied and deceived into killing their child.
	They are victims, every bit as much as the aborted child.
	And I feel very sorry for them.
	And so we really do pray that God would...
	Bless him. Give him more time.
	But certainly, God doesn't need a lot of time.
	And so we just hope that he has a relationship with God.
	He has the time now.
	I hope sometimes we get an illness diagnostic, and that can really focus our minds on what we...
	You know, we all go through this world whistling through the graveyard, knowing that we are all headed to the same end.
	Sometimes a disease like this could possibly be a blessing, regardless of the direction that it goes.
	But it's always a horrible thing for the family, and so we pray for them, and we pray that he would be given time for this, and given more time that God would help him with this.
	Thank you for listening.
	Have a good day. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for watching.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.

▲