Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 14, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:58

The David Knight Show - 02/14/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's the 14th of February, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to be talking about world government.
	We're going to be talking about the borders and specifically how they fit into the world government agenda.
	And in the third hour, we're going to have Serge the Purge and Jason Barker join us to talk about a documentary that they've done at the border and how they have been radically censored.
	But we also have people who are waking up About the pharmaceutical agenda.
	And yet it comes so close to pointing out who did the lockdown and how this is all a globalist agenda, but they won't connect that final line.
	Truly amazing. We'll talk about that as well as what is going on financially as we see the stock market rocked over a We'll be right back.
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, your annual global risk report makes for a very special and sobering read. The Global Risk Report is a report that is designed to provide a comprehensive and comprehensive analysis of global risk.
	The Global Risk Report is designed for the international community. The Global Risk Report is designed to provide a comprehensive makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate.
	It is disinformation and misinformation.
	followed closely by polarization within our society.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You are listening to The David Knight Show.
	Yeah, it's telling the truth is revolutionary act.
	And by the way, she didn't mention the fact that they were going to be creating chaos, confusion, and conflict and disinformation.
	They're the creators of that.
	They're not trying to stop it.
	That's their program.
	Their program to control.
	And so we go from Davos just a month ago.
	From the snow-covered mountains of Davos now to the desert in Dubai.
	The World Government Summit.
	There's no world government, right?
	And world governance.
	Governance. All these people have a hand in it.
	And the clip that...
	It came out about a day or so ago, a little bit late in terms of talking about this Klaus Schwab transhumanism because there were some more pressing issues I need to talk about.
	He hasn't said anything new.
	He just keeps saying the same thing about how he wants to push us into a post-human future where we're all going to be controlled by their dominance of technology.
	Isn't that... Interesting and self-serving that these people, these technocrats, who have so much money and so much technology, believe that that is going to be the thing that we will all bow down and worship.
	It's going to be the organizing principle around our life.
	Well, we're going to talk about how that's not going to happen.
	But here's Klaus Schwab.
	And when I was speaking here, seven years ago, after having written a book about the Fourth Industrial Revolution, I know how this revolution will change how we live, how we act, how we communicate, how we produce, and how we consume.
	Now, we are speaking not just about the fourth industrial revolution.
	We are speaking about the transition of humankind into a new era Which is not just characterized by technological change.
	A new era where humankind We'll enjoy many more opportunities and possibilities.
	You'll become like God and you'll live forever, you know?
	It's a transition. It's a transition from the...
	We first had the transition about a hundred years ago from the agricultural society to the industrial society.
	But today, we speak about the transition into what I would call the intelligent age.
	And I did something maybe unusual.
	I took ChatGPT and I had a long discussion with ChatGPT, with my pot, if I may say so, to see how this new era will look like.
	And finally, I had about 20 pages of text and I asked ChatGPT Summarize the text and tell me now, based on our discussion, how will the new era, the intelligent era, look like?
	And I read you the text.
	Envisioning a future propelled by the technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, we see a new dawn of human civilization One that harmonizes technology with the deepest needs and aspirations of humanity.
	This vision Unfolds within a society where artificial intelligence, robotics, the internet of the things, 3D printing, genetic engineering, quantum computing become the foundations of our daily life.
	Hyper-materialism.
	All of my little gadgets and everything become the foundation of my modern life.
	They are so taken with their technology.
	It's disgusting, quite frankly.
	And he talks about the intelligent era.
	It might be error.
	But I think he really means the intelligence era.
	An age of spies.
	An artificial intelligence.
	Really, that is the key function of artificial intelligence, if you stop and think about it.
	It really is not intelligence in terms of being a thinking machine, but intelligence in terms of artificially being able to surveil people.
	Because that's what it does.
	It doesn't come up with any original thinking.
	Do you notice what he did there?
	I had a long discussion with my chat GPT, with my bot, with his bot.
	And so what does he do?
	He feeds like 20 pages and asks it to summarize it.
	And of course, if I feed my show into these chat GPT bots and ask them to summarize it, they refuse to do so because of their built-in bias.
	Verboten topics that must not be named.
	But it will summarize his approved topics.
	Artificial intelligence...
	It's really about watching us and repeating things that we say.
	That's why it really is the ultimate Stasi.
	And it is the automated Stasi.
	It is about intelligence.
	It's not intelligent.
	All it's doing is scraping stuff and summarizing stuff and regurgitating what you feed it.
	But it can be very good at summarizing and organizing and regurgitating what we say.
	And we're going to talk about that aspect of it.
	Because that is what we need to be concerned about.
	And the idiots.
	The idiots like Klaus Schwab.
	Look, when I see people like Klaus Schwab and Yuval Harari, I get really excited.
	Because these are the apparent Goliaths out there.
	They're taunting the living God.
	They will be struck down.
	They have no idea what they're up against.
	Arrogant, arrogant, godless, materialistic people who are regurgitating the same lies that we've seen since the Garden of Eden.
	You'll become like God and you'll live forever.
	They sincerely believe that lie.
	They are being led to the slaughter and we will not follow them.
	We will not be a part of this.
	An open letter to the Davos crowd from Rob Jenkins at the Brownstone Institute.
	He said, You creepy Bond villain-in-chief, Klaus Schwab, chairman of the World Economic Forum, openly calling for, quote, permanent interaction between governments and regulatory agencies on the one hand and business on the other.
	In other words, for a kind of global fascism.
	That's right. These Nazis who are a part of this, and of course, you know, they just go from meeting to meeting, you know.
	Davos, they've got the World Government Summit, they've got their Club of Rome meetings, their Bilderberg meetings.
	The more important ones are the ones that they don't talk about, like Bilderberg and things like that.
	These other ones are public displays for your consumption to show you how impressive they are.
	These people are like peacocks who fan out their tail feathers to look like something that they're not.
	So it is a kind of global fascism, and this is about economics.
	And you understand that since World War II, the design for conquering the Welt It's always been about the economics, of course, right?
	And that's what they did with Bilderberg.
	They had an economic conference right there at the spot where the Nazis had their last victory.
	They're at that bridge at the Bilderberg Hotel, 10 years to the day after that victory.
	Nothing to see there, just a coincidence.
	And, of course, the people who were chairing it were...
	People that had been identified, had never convicted.
	Prince Barnhart, Lord Carrington, being people who had been spies, saboteurs, to engineer that last Nazi victory.
	So they began that, and they began it all with economic measures.
	You'll have a free trade zone, and all the rest of this stuff.
	And this is what this is about.
	And of course, in the U.S., we had Zbigniew Brzezinski, Talking about how we would do the same thing.
	We'd make three global areas and then we would unite the three areas.
	And he talked about a coming technocratic age.
	And he said right there in the 1970s when he wrote that, he said, we are between two ages.
	But we will be able to determine what people are going to do even before they know what they're going to do.
	Because it'll be total surveillance.
	Everything that you do, everything that you're about to do will be known.
	And so he goes on to say, Rob Jenkins at Brownstone, he says, Meanwhile, Schwab's oily henchman, Yuval Harari, asserts that human rights exist only in the imagination.
	Well, of course he does.
	Because he says God only exists in your imagination.
	When you take away God, you take away your human rights, you take away your humanity.
	In this materialistic world, that's all that's left.
	And that's why they push it so hard.
	One need not be a prophet to see where this is heading.
	We have had prophets who see where this is headed 2,000 years ago and beyond.
	So the good news is that the elites across the world trust each other more and more.
	I've played that clip for you many times.
	So now we come together, we design and we do beautiful things together.
	The bad news is that the majority of people trust their elites less.
	So we can lead, but if people aren't following, we're not going to get to where we want to go.
	That's right. It really is up to us.
	And we're not going to lead them.
	We're not going to follow them. We're not going to do as we're told, as he points out.
	But he says, calling your pandemic response botched would be the greatest understatement in history.
	Now listen to what he has to say, because he got this exactly right.
	He says that all of these things, the lockdown...
	The masking up, the social distancing, offering ourselves as human guinea pigs, all of this stuff.
	He said that was a Davos agenda, a globalist agenda, if you will.
	And again, we use Davos in a world economic form, but it's the UN, it's Davos, it's the Bilderberg, the World Government Summit, it's all these people.
	He heard what he said.
	It's what I've been saying. This is a globalist agenda.
	Lockdown, mask up, socially distance, off ourselves as human guinea pigs.
	Did Trump expose the globalists?
	Or did he join the globalists?
	Did he fight the globalists?
	Or did he implement their policies of lockdown, mask up, social distance, off ourselves as human guinea pigs?
	You tell me.
	Is he a globalist traitor, Benedict Donald?
	I think he is. I think he's not stupid.
	And I think it's going to be really bad if he's a president again.
	Because people will trust him.
	They'll be afraid to criticize him.
	The very people who point to Davos, who point to Fauci, who point to the vaccine and the murder.
	These same people will not make the connection to Trump.
	Will not mention his name.
	He's the Voldemort of the conservative movement.
	He who must not be named.
	This is a crisis that was planned.
	This is a crisis that was rehearsed for two decades.
	And it's a crisis that was implemented by Donald J. Trump.
	So, he says it quickly morphed into economic, social, and political crisis.
	Well, that's right.
	That was the purpose of the entire thing.
	And so, when we...
	We characterize this as one other author, James Howard Kunstler says, these people are desperate lunatics.
	And he quotes Tom Luongo, who says, it's not enough to be against globalism or against the WEF. We have to also be for something better.
	See, that's really true. That's really true.
	As I said before, you know, if we don't have a culture, we can't win the culture war.
	We have for the longest time become passive observers and consumers of the culture that is fed to us.
	And it wasn't all that different from our own culture when it began in Hollywood.
	You go back and you look at the 1950s.
	They were doing sword and sandal things because the country was very much into biblical Christianity.
	So, all right, we'll do that for them.
	And then they gradually move it.
	You've got Disney who starts out very American, very wholesome stuff, but his successors move it further and further away.
	And, of course, this is not Hollywood reflecting the culture.
	I've mentioned it before, the Silver Screen BBC series that was done.
	It was narrated by James Mason.
	James Mason goes through the different series.
	As I've said before, it's very fascinating because they talk about the evolution of lighting, the evolution of photography, movie photography, and all the rest of the stuff.
	But they do also talk about how wild and crazy and perverted Hollywood was.
	And in the early years, they began right away doing all kinds of depravity and nudity and all the rest of the stuff.
	So they had the government come in and tell them, police yourself or we'll police you.
	But that's where these people were.
	You know, the stars have always been doing drugs and sex and all the rest of the stuff from the very beginning.
	They had a lot of money.
	There was always the casting couch and always the orgies at the parties and all the rest of the stuff from the very beginning.
	They just put on a different facade because, you know, they're actors.
	That's what they do. Hypocrites.
	That's the Greek word for an actor.
	And so that was what it was always about.
	And so we kind of passively sat back and consumed all of this stuff.
	And we lost our culture. But more importantly, we lost our connection to God.
	Because these people are not connected to God.
	They're opposed to God.
	And even in the churches, as I pointed out yesterday, Joel Osteen, you know, he began all of this.
	When I went back and played that old interview that he had with Larry King, you notice how he's just, I don't want to judge anybody.
	I don't judge Larry.
	I don't want to judge anybody's heart, you know, and all this kind of stuff.
	He doesn't want to stand for right and wrong.
	And even Larry King is saying, Larry King doesn't believe Jesus, but he knows what Jesus said.
	He said, but what that lady just said on the phone, Jesus said, I am the way, the truth, the life.
	There's only one way, only one truth.
	You don't have multiple truths.
	I don't have a truth. You have a truth.
	This is postmodernism.
	There's only one truth. Which one is it?
	It's that exclusivity.
	And I am the life.
	The only way to life.
	And so he said, I don't believe that.
	Joel Osteen was the epitome decades ago.
	That's how he became so wealthy and so famous.
	Because he embodied the spirit of the age decades ago.
	I'm not going to stand for anything.
	I'm just going to be there.
	I'm not going to offend anybody.
	I'm going to tell everybody. Do your own thing.
	Everything is accepted and all the rest of this stuff.
	You see, a lot of this stuff has come from the so-called churches.
	But that is the spirit of the age.
	The spirit of the age is that we've all got our own truth and so forth.
	So, we have to have something better.
	We have to have a vision. We're not going to win a culture war if we don't have a culture.
	We don't have a culture anymore. They've told us that our culture is evil.
	They have torn down our statues.
	They have rewritten our history.
	They are ripping down everything.
	All the remnants of our civilization are being torn down by these people.
	They tore them down in our hearts and minds a long time ago.
	Now they're taking down the physical remnants of it.
	That's what the removal of statues are about.
	And we're not going to win a spiritual war, which is what this is.
	We're not going to win a spiritual war without God.
	That's what this ultimately comes down to.
	These people are boasting.
	Why do the nations rage against God and his Christ?
	Why? Well, God laughs.
	We should laugh as well.
	It really is funny. People say, this is really serious stuff, and it is.
	It's really serious stuff. When you murder tens of millions of people worldwide with your poisonous shot, that is serious stuff.
	But God looks at these boasting, preening politicians and elitists, and he laughs in derision.
	So, he says, Decentralization is what
	people want to have.
	As a matter of fact, I had a listener send me...
	I think his name is Rick.
	Rick Beto. He does commentary on music on YouTube.
	He's got quite a large following, and he was talking about the fact that music has become so decentralized that he says, I don't think there's going to be any more big bands.
	What are they going to do in the Super Bowl in the future?
	Is there enough...
	Of a commonality in society for people to make a really big band like that.
	Or is everything very atomized?
	And it is atomized, but it's atomized also because of the technology.
	People create their own personal playlists of what they want to listen to.
	And so you don't have this commonality.
	I remember, you know, 50 years ago...
	You would put on the radio stations and they all had a top 40 list.
	It's just like when we had three TV stations.
	There'd be shows that you absolutely hated, but you knew all about them because the TV was constantly on the background in most households.
	It wasn't mine when I was growing up.
	I haven't watched TV now for about 30 years.
	But when I was growing up, it was always on.
	And the same thing was true of radio.
	You know, you're in the car, you're listening to the radio, you have these common songs that are out there, and I still remember, you know, you hear these songs, it's like, oh, I hate that song, I hate that song so much.
	But there's also something about it that is kind of nostalgic, you know, so after it takes on this patina of age and nostalgia, you can almost set through it again.
	Almost. Before you flip it off if it comes on.
	But I don't really get that stuff anymore.
	Because if I'm in the car, I'm listening to either music that I've chosen or playlists that I have custom created.
	And that's what Beto was talking about.
	He was, or Beto, or Beato, I don't know how he pronounces his last name.
	But he was talking about that.
	He said, even in the sense that the music companies have cracked down on copyright violations with social media, That would be the one place where you could start to really build a big persona would be on the social media things.
	But now it's that they're cracking down on that because it's going to even mitigate against that.
	So there is a decentralization that is happening.
	But in that particular case, when he's making that case for decentralization in music, for example, that is dependent on the technology.
	The technology is what is making it either centralized or decentralized.
	And so we still, if we don't deliberately push back against this, we are still going to be controlled by the technology that we spend so much of our time with, looking at that black mirror, that smartphone, and smartphones for dummies.
	So when he looks at this, he says, so the world is going in the opposite direction.
	The world is going towards decentralization.
	Well, that certainly is our desire.
	And that's where the battle is.
	And that's why these people are openly coming out and rallying the troops and spending all of this.
	They have technology and money at their disposal that nobody has ever had before.
	Not only has nobody ever had the types of technology that they have, but nobody has ever had this vast concentration of wealth.
	That we now see with the global elites, with the technocrats, with Silicon Valley and these other individuals.
	And so that's where the battle is going to be.
	And that's why they're so focused on censorship and surveillance as means of control.
	We don't want to have things that are centrally controlled, but they do.
	And those are their means of central control.
	So that is where the battle is.
	The battle is over CBDC. The battle is over centralization.
	And that is, as he looks at it, he says, everything in our world wants to get smaller, slower, finer, and more local.
	More local. That is how we win.
	We win by executing what we want.
	Not by allowing them to execute what they want.
	They want centralization.
	They want big institutions.
	Now he's pointing out that these colossal institutions and industries and arrangements are cracking down.
	This is part of the fourth turning.
	This doesn't necessarily mean that they will not reorganize.
	So we don't want to be complacent about the centralized control of money, the centralized control of communications.
	So that's the issue right there.
	That's what the fight is over.
	Decentralizing that.
	He says giant retailing outfits from giant retailing outfits to worldwide business networks to overgrown universities and high schools to transportation matrices to metroplex cities to mega farms to the political parties.
	All of this rot, he says, is probably the greatest problem.
	Even more so in the financial institutions.
	And of course that's true because it is the fiat currency that is creating this massive concentration of wealth and power.
	That's what it's all based upon.
	And the banks and money systems will also come crashing down.
	But understand, that is a part of what they want.
	They want chaos.
	They want things to be overturned.
	They understand the cycle of human history and where we are in that cycle right now.
	We're towards the tail end of a fourth turning.
	And they understand that these major institutions, everybody loses trust in them.
	They are changed.
	Again, the question is, are they going to be changed in a way to favor the elites, or are we going to change them?
	We can't win this.
	If we don't have a culture, and we can't win this because it's ultimately a spiritual war, we can't win this without a connection to God.
	So he says, it's also a fact that shale oil is subject to natural limits and we're out of sweet spots to drill.
	This is where he totally leaves me.
	I completely disagree with this.
	He's talking about how, well, they're bound out of oil in the North Sea and shale oil is getting less and so forth and so on.
	No, no.
	That is a solvable problem.
	This is not fossil fuels.
	There's an abundance of all of this stuff.
	These things are happening because they're shutting down these fields.
	And he even mentions some of these.
	In Germany, some psychotic fugue state shut down its entire nuclear power industry while France is just not replacing its nuke plants as they age out.
	Europe is completely screwed.
	Why? Well, because this is a planned takedown.
	Our governments, at every national level, are not suicidal.
	They're not suicidal.
	They want to survive this.
	They are demicidal.
	They want to kill us.
	They want to destroy everything for us.
	At the same time they're taking down the power, you realize that, and we'll get to this in a minute, Sam Altman, the new candidate for the Antichrist, Sam Altman is out there talking about how he needs seven trillion dollars.
	Seven trillion dollars to redo the semiconductor industry so they can get faster and faster chips so they can do more and more artificial intelligence.
	Well, where are they going to get the power for all this stuff?
	They are destroying our power grids left and right.
	Of course, they will create power for themselves.
	They'll reserve it for themselves, just as they're building their bunkers.
	It was kind of funny to see, tried to report.
	Biblical prophecy.
	The elites are going underground.
	And they go back to Revelation, where it says the people will say to the mountains, fall on us, and they'll hide underground, all the rest of the stuff.
	Well, that's true. I don't think they've seen what is really going to make them cry out about that yet.
	That's not yet been revealed.
	Nevertheless, they are doomers.
	The elites are doomers.
	The ones who are pulling the levers are doomers.
	Why? Because they're pulling the levers down on us, and they know that we're going to push back.
	Hugo de Garis talked about this a long time ago.
	The Artilect War. As they move into artificial intelligence, people will realize, wait a minute.
	I know where this leads. I know what you guys are up to, and they're going to come after the elite.
	So what are they going to do? Well, he had posited when he wrote this a couple of decades ago.
	He said, well, they'll take to their space stations and stuff like that.
	They're not that far along. So what are they doing?
	They're going underground. They're creating these bunkers.
	They've got moats around them.
	They've got walls of fire around them and all the rest of this stuff.
	Folks, these people are scared to death.
	They're afraid of us.
	They're afraid of dying. They won't admit it, but they know there's a God, and they're afraid to die.
	There's going to be a wall of fire around a lot of these people.
	But they are afraid.
	They're running afraid. They are not what they puff themselves up to look like.
	So the period of disorderly transition we're in is not moving forward and not moving toward greater dominance by giants, but to survival of the small and the nimble.
	This is his opinion here.
	He says, Provide for the future with gold, as I point out many times.
	Tony Ardobin, our sponsor here, davidknight.gold.
	But to get gold and silver, prepare for some of that stuff.
	And you should prepare for things like that.
	But there's other ways as well that you want to prepare.
	And he mentioned some of them. He said, for instance, you know, capital, real wealth, certainly is not going to be in some kind of an online digital thing.
	It's not going to be in a foreign stock market with pieces of paper and things that you trade over the Internet.
	It's going to be with real tangible things that are decentralized, that are private.
	You have private transactional freedom.
	It's going to also be the friends that you can count on.
	It's also going to be your reputation for honesty.
	Oh yeah, how about that?
	You think honesty is going to make a comeback?
	Because we don't value it today, do we?
	If we like some political party or we like some TV personality, we'll don't care if they're honest or not.
	Or you get a pastor you like, like Joel Austin, you don't care if he's honest or not.
	I mean, the guy's absolutely fraudulent to call himself a Christian pastor.
	Call it something else, Joel.
	Don't say that you're Christian.
	Why do you call me Lord, Lord, and don't do what I say, and deny what I say?
	Quite frankly, I think that is the biggest part of taking God's name in vain.
	It's interesting how everybody says Jesus Christ as a curse word, isn't it?
	I even had a friend from Japan who said, yeah, I always thought that was kind of strange, too, until I became a Christian.
	Why would we use Jesus Christ as a swear word in a country that was largely not Christian at all?
	I don't know what their religion was, Buddhist or Shintoism or whatever, but they don't swear by any of those things.
	But more importantly, I think it is to say that you're a Christian and not be a Christian.
	That's taking God's name in vain, isn't it?
	That's what people like Joel Osteen do.
	Anyway, he says it's going to be friends that you can count on, your reputation for honesty, your dependability, your acquired skills.
	That's a very important thing.
	If you don't have a lot of money to be able to buy gold and silver, learn right now.
	Look on YouTube.
	Get some skills that you can actually do physical things.
	And actually, you can use the internet right now to help to train yourself very quickly on acquiring certain skills.
	And your health, your physical health, your psychological health.
	Of course, he doesn't mention your spiritual health.
	The most important of all is left out of this.
	He says, don't discount human ingenuity and resourcefulness, our ability to work around and reinvent systems for daily life, even if it's on a downscaled and more modest level.
	There will be an underground economy.
	That's the way people survive.
	They want to take us into a third world type of environment.
	They want to pull back our access to technology.
	And so understand, that's what people do in areas where that has happened.
	They do create small decentralized things.
	And again, since the spiritual aspect of this is so important, there'll be small decentralized churches that are underground, and they will thrive, as they do in China.
	The more you oppress the church, the stronger it gets.
	Because what they're doing is they're winnowing out the Joel Osteens.
	He'll be the first to go.
	Well, I don't want to have anything to do with that.
	He'll take his money and run to his underground bunker or something somewhere.
	Expect small local clinics to appear from the ashes of medical conglomerates.
	By the way, I had a listener ask me, If I knew, he said, how do I get out of the medical establishment?
	Quite frankly, I don't, at this point in time, have a good answer.
	I've talked to people who said, yeah, we're going to build something.
	We're going to build a network. I don't know.
	And so he is in, I think if I remember correctly, Washington.
	I'll read the email tomorrow, but I think he's in Washington State.
	But if anybody has any information about that, we should put that up as a clearing thing.
	Send it to me and I'll repeat it.
	If you know physicians in an area that...
	Don't toe the line. I'll be happy to refer those people to anyone.
	Or if there is some network, as some of the ones that I've talked to, there's ample talent out there.
	Because the best doctors are the ones who, number one, understood what was going on.
	I've talked to medical people since I had to go in with his heart stuff and anything.
	I go and I talk to the technicians that are there.
	And so I'll ask them, you know, did you get the vaccine?
	Oh yeah, I got the vaccine.
	It's like, oh no. This guy's going to be drawing my blood.
	He did a horrible job of it as well, the phlebotomist.
	He was...
	I mean, I got this big black and blue mark.
	He can't find out what the truth is.
	He can't figure that out. He can't even find the vein in my arm as a phlebotomist.
	And so, you know, you look at this and you talk to people about that type of stuff.
	And you want somebody who knew what was going on.
	These people honestly didn't know.
	And they still don't know. And since they didn't get sick, they didn't look into it.
	But you want somebody who knows, and you want somebody who has the integrity to oppose it.
	And those people have been kicked out of the system.
	And so there's a tremendous pool of talent, medical talent, that is out there that is just waiting to be organized.
	And somebody will do it.
	Some other people are working on it right now.
	I don't know anybody who is there yet, but if you do, let me know.
	Um, anyway, the, um, expect Americans to return to churches, he says, is an organizing mechanism for community relations.
	Well, that's not, that's your purpose of church.
	It's not a church that's going to have any effect.
	But in the past, in the past, churches were a center of the community.
	When you look at Alexis de Tocqueville, when he came to America early, was it 1830s?
	Is that when he came, I think? Um, he looked at it and he said, yeah, everything is voluntary.
	And the first thing people would do would be to turn to the churches to get things done.
	When we had my son, Whistler, when both Whistler and Travis competed in contests with Frazier Institute out of Canada for Canadian and American high school students, and they both won several years in a row, trade back and forth, first place, second place.
	But Whistler did a...
	I think comparing and contrasting a hurricane that hit the coast of North Carolina, where the federal government got involved, where FEMA got involved, and how they exacerbated all the problems, kept people away from their homes and other things like that, versus a localized disaster where the federal government fortunately did not get involved, which is when a tornado came through and tore up a town not too far away from us.
	So he interviewed people from both of those places.
	And the people, what happened in that town that was hit with a tornado, They had the police go out, and their involvement was to keep people away from downed power lines.
	That's all they did, which is good.
	And then you had businesses say, we'll donate food.
	And so what they did was, who's going to distribute it?
	Did they go to the government to distribute it?
	No. They brought food into the churches, left it in the parking lots, and the people at those churches distributed the food, the free food that had been left.
	That's the way America used to be.
	On integrity. Why did they take it to the churches?
	Well, because they trusted them to get this thing done.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at Tucker Carlson at the World Government Summit.
	We'll be right back.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, they say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	You can download the app from the link in the description.
	Download the app.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, Michelle Obama and Big Mike left several comments and several individual tips there.
	I'll read the comments.
	Thank you for supporting the program.
	And yes, folks, if you would click like, If you like the stream as it's going on, or even if you're watching this as a rebroadcast, please like it wherever you're listening to it, even if it's not live.
	Please like it if you're listening to it on a podcast, or if you're listening to it on a rebroadcast on BitChute, on Rumble, or on Odyssey.
	Those places, if you like it there, that helps our visibility a great deal.
	And that's something we struggle with.
	Even on these, uh, secondary, uh, channels that don't censor us, we still need to have a visibility.
	So that helps us a great deal.
	It doesn't cost anything for you.
	Just click it right there where you're listening to it.
	And also, you know, wherever you pick up the podcast, if you're listening to the audio podcast, if you take the time to go to the homepage there and we have the homepages for the podcast, even though it is pretty much everywhere pushed out from our hosting site, everywhere.
	It can be hard to find these things.
	I've gone to these different places and looked, and it's very difficult to find.
	That's why we put links to the podcast, depending on these different platforms, put links to the podcast at a lot of different platforms on the website at thedavidknightshow.com.
	So if you're having trouble finding it, or if you need to know, maybe you've already set it up a long time ago, you need to know Where you can go to like the podcast, well, you can find those links there at thedavidknightshow.com.
	But again, I'll read his comments.
	He said, $10 for saying Voldemort.
	And I guess it was when I was talking about Joel Osteen.
	He said, pick a verse, any verse.
	And he's going to be in contradiction pretty much to what God has to say.
	He says, I only recently found Jesus, in large part to this show.
	Well, thank you for letting me know that.
	He says, I was Catholic my whole life, so please understand.
	I do. My wife grew up as a Catholic and changed her position.
	Look, I see Catholics as co-belligerents in a lot of these struggles.
	And they have a different understanding of what it takes to have a salvation relationship with Christ.
	And so I just say we all need to be humble about that.
	We all need to always constantly be reaffirming and reassessing what we believe.
	And we need to understand there's going to be one standard, and that's going to be the Bible.
	That's what does not change.
	That's the same type of thing we see with, you know, political sphere.
	Constitution is there.
	And, but you have other things, you know, you have Supreme Court and other people want to bring in tradition or they want to bring in some things coming from another part of the world.
	When they talk about Roe v.
	Wade, you know, they began that by saying, well, you know, there's a lot of different ideas scientifically and culturally and everything about when life begins.
	But, you know, we have to make our decision based on the Constitution.
	Well, the Constitution is silent about that, isn't it?
	Founders didn't pretend to know when life begins.
	They just believed that God was the one who started it.
	So leave that process alone.
	But then throughout the rest of the decision of Roe v.
	Wade, they look at tradition.
	They look at other cultures and things like that.
	And so, you know, you can have the authority of people and authority who's going to tell you what to do.
	You can look at cultural tradition, but you can also look at the unchanging text.
	And that's the key thing.
	So, anyway, Tucker Carlson is at the World Government Summit.
	And he calls out the transhumanists who think that they are God.
	Well, that's good. I'm glad that he's doing that.
	And, of course, we've been doing that for a long time.
	And, look, it's beyond even the transhumanists, of course, right?
	This also applies to politicians.
	I've said for the longest time that whenever you see some politician who starts to talk about God or starts to talk about his faith, Even if, you know, and you can look at a lot of these people and you can realize that they're kind of TV evangelists.
	They're not sincere about this stuff.
	But somebody has a sincere belief in God.
	That seems to make them even more afraid.
	You know, they can handle demagogues, but you got somebody who is a sincere believer in God.
	Oh, he's scary. This guy's like a cult leader or something.
	No. No, it's...
	I've always said, don't be afraid of the person who's got a sincere belief in God because they understand they're not God.
	They understand they're going to have to account for the things that they do in this life.
	I said, be afraid of the person who doesn't believe in God, who is searching for ultimate control and power, who seeks to be God.
	And we've had politicians and leaders like this throughout human history.
	Those are the people you need to be afraid of.
	The people who aspire to be God. It's only recently that these people said, well, we got the technology that we can live forever and we can become God. The other people, they're just...
	But it's not anything new to have men who think that they are God or they're going to aspire to be God.
	And even though they don't put their hope in being able to transfer themselves in whatever they are, right?
	You ask them this question.
	Are you going to transfer yourself into a robot or a piece of machinery or something like that?
	So what are you?
	Tell me, what is it that you're transferring into that?
	Because you're not, you're a complete materialist.
	And you're not going to take any part of your body and put it into that robot.
	So what is it? What are you?
	What are you that you're transferring?
	Is there a soul that you're transferring in there?
	Are you just a collection of electrical signals that are in your mind that you're going to transfer that, somehow transfer that constellation of electrical signals?
	You think it's ones and zeros or something in your mind?
	No, it's not. No.
	So they don't even have an answer to that question.
	They truly are self-deceived.
	But there have been people, and just look at all the people that we've got in Washington right now, who desire to have absolute total power.
	Just had Nancy Pelosi say, that's no big deal that Joe Biden is old.
	I'm older than he is.
	It's the first time you see a woman say that, right?
	But, and then she also says, and he said he can't recall in a deposition.
	Everybody says they can't recall in a deposition.
	Yeah, all of her friends.
	And she does, right?
	In other words, they lie when they're under oath and on the stand.
	Oh, I can't remember. I can't remember any of this stuff.
	That's the way she's portraying this.
	But when you look at Dianne Feinstein, when you look at Mitch McConnell, when you look at Joe Biden, even when you look at Donald Trump, none of these people think they're going to die, ever.
	Ever. They don't think about death.
	They don't think about what comes next.
	And so that is a common trait of people who desire to become God.
	It's only with the technocrats that they say, well, we're going to actually transfer ourselves into some kind of a machine to live forever and to become God-like.
	But it's always this deception.
	It's always this lying to themselves, oh, I'm not going to die ever.
	You know, Darth Vader Ginsburg, you know, dying in office.
	I mean, that's the way it happens all the time.
	So, these people will recoil in fear as soon as somebody with sincere religious belief starts talking.
	They'll say, well, we've got separation of church and state and all the rest of the stuff.
	No, you want to have people who realize that they are accountable to a supreme being, that they can't get around that.
	If you've got these people out there who think, well, they've got to catch me.
	And I think I'm smarter than they are.
	In most cases, they are.
	And they're all slippery.
	They're very clever. And so, yeah, they've gotten away with a lot of stuff to get to the point where they are right now, for the most part, right?
	But you've got somebody who realizes there isn't any escape from God's judgment.
	He knows everything that I've done.
	And I'll be held accountable.
	That's the kind of person you want ruling over you.
	That's what the founders understood.
	That's the only kind of person.
	The only kind of person.
	That's why up until the mid-20th century, You still had a requirement to believe in God.
	They gradually, first it was, you know, you had these different states that were created for different Christian denominations.
	One of them, you know, Maryland is Catholic, Rhode Island is Baptist, and so the Northeastern states were congregationalists or whatever.
	And so you had to be a member of that church.
	Then they broadened it out, and you had to be a Protestant.
	Then they broadened out, well, Protestant or Catholic.
	Then they made it, you've got to believe in God.
	And then they got rid of that in the mid-20th century.
	Once they did that, You're getting rid of the qualification to have somebody that is, and of course, they don't even pretend anymore.
	You had people who would pretend, people would be hypocrites.
	But you don't want to get past the idea that we ought to be ruled by people who have character, integrity, and know that they'll be accountable.
	Because then you wind up with people like Trump and Biden.
	They're proud of their scent and what they can get away with.
	So, Tucker Carlson takes on the transhumanists there.
	And so, he says, when you think that you can create a better human being through technology, you're very dangerous because you don't understand your own limits and you get a lot of people killed.
	He went on to say that humility is a sign of wisdom that transhumanists who think that they are God are very dangerous and that they will get a lot of people killed.
	And of course, you know, politicians who thought that they were God would get a lot of people killed in their wars.
	Because that's what they always do.
	They're not content to rule over a nation.
	They want to rule over other nations as well.
	So they start wars and get people killed that way.
	He says, by contrast, when you believe that you have the power to shape the world and other people, as we're hearing this morning, though, you know, biohacking, when you think that you can create a better human being through technology, you are very dangerous.
	You don't understand your own limits.
	He didn't mention specifically, but it may have been that clip that I played for you of Klaus Schwab bragging about the transition of humankind into a new era.
	An intelligence age, we should call it, where they spy on everything that we have.
	Klaus Schwab said, we have to be prepared for a world where we see a fusion of our physical, our digital, our biological dimensions.
	Now, this is a very old quote.
	He repeated it again two days ago on Monday.
	He repeated this again.
	But again, physical, digital, and biological dimensions.
	What he's missing there is spiritual, right?
	Because, again, he is a materialist.
	But for him, his religion, his immaterial world that he believes in so much, is the digital world, the virtual world.
	Yeah, you will become gods, the oldest lie, from Satan going back to the Garden of Eden.
	At the beginning of the discussion at the World Government Summit, Carlson said that he had been trying to get an interview with Putin for years, but the U.S. intelligence agencies were spying on him and trying to prevent the interview.
	Well, I still don't trust Tucker.
	I don't trust Tucker.
	I'm not sure that he's still not carrying the CIA's water.
	You see, even when he says true things like this, He's still kind of holding back on things like 9-11.
	He's holding back on Dark Winter, the Germ Games, what happened in 2020.
	He won't use Trump's name.
	It is Voldemort for him as well.
	He won't talk about that aspect of the global agenda.
	It's safe to talk about transhumanism.
	It's not safe to talk about the lockdowns, the mask mandates, the social distancing, the poisonous injection that was put in because all these people that he's talking to there, they all had a hand in that.
	And Trump had a hand in that.
	And so, right now, there is this partisan blinders that are on the people who are very angry, in general, About the vaccine poison, about the lockdowns and social distancing and the masking, but they won't associate it to the guy who did it.
	They think that he's their hope.
	This is the most amazing delusion.
	And to me, that is a stronger correlation to the prophecies from Revelation than, you know, elites building underground bunkers.
	The fact that God would send us such a strong delusion, that we could despise everything that Trump did, but never, ever blame him for it.
	They blame Biden, and rightfully so, for everything that happens in the Biden administration, and always have.
	But not Trump.
	A strong delusion.
	So, when you look at this, you understand if you are running a con on people, what is that?
	It's a confidence game. It is necessary for people to become trusted.
	It is necessary for a Glenn Beck or an Alex Jones or a Tucker Carlson or a Donald Trump to tell you the truth.
	To tell you the truth. Oh yeah, he gets it.
	He's on our side, because he sees the same problems that we do.
	And to build their street creds with you.
	To get your confidence.
	So then they can hook you at some point.
	That's what a con man does, right?
	He comes in, he gets your confidence.
	And of course, that's what the intelligence agencies have always done.
	If you've got a double agent, what do they do?
	Oh, they give you real stuff for the longest time.
	Until the big one comes, and then they turn it.
	In the same way that as these people broke the codes in World War II, well, let's not let the enemy know that we broke the codes.
	So we'll sit there and we'll let our troops get hit because we know there's a bigger payoff coming down the road.
	If we warn them, they'll know that we broke the code.
	So we've got to wait until we've got the right time.
	Now that's not 4D chess.
	Okay, as Alex Jones is pushing this out there.
	Because Trump wasn't holding back in 2020.
	The 4-D chess, if there ever was any, was to make us think that he was on our side.
	And the candidate Trump in the first couple of years...
	Then he starts doing the gun control by executive order and then pulls the big one.
	The really big one.
	The biggest betrayal of the United States and the Constitution that any person has ever done.
	Far bigger than Benedict Arnold.
	Anyway, he says, yeah, the intelligence agencies admitted that they did it.
	So I was totally determined.
	They told me that I couldn't interview Putin on the basis of illegitimate means and for no really clearly stated justification.
	So he determined that he was going to do it.
	So now we can all trust him, right?
	Because even though he wanted to be in the CIA, even though his dad was in the CIA, even though he lied to us for years about pharmaceutical stuff, made $25 million a year or whatever, lying to us about pharmaceuticals, we can trust him now, even though he hasn't come clean or repented of any of this stuff.
	He says he's also radicalized by his trip to Moscow, So, Zero Hedge, when they reported that, said, well, even if he doesn't get an interview with Putin, Tucker is likely to report what he's seeing there.
	What he's going to see is a city that looks like it's doing well economically, on top of being cleaner and safer than American cities like New York or L.A. In an interview with the World Government Summit in Dubai, he said the trip to Moscow radicalized him.
	What was radicalizing, he said, very shocking, very disturbing to me, was that the city of Moscow, where I'd never been, the biggest city in Europe, 13 million people, it is so much nicer than any city in my country.
	I had no idea.
	He said my father spent a lot of time there in the 1980s when he worked for the U.S. government as a disinformation agent.
	Which Tucker wanted to be, which Tucker may be.
	Anyway, he said, my father, when he was there, they barely had electricity, and now it is so much cleaner and safer and prettier.
	Aesthetically, it's architecture, it's food, it's service, than any city in the United States that you have to ask.
	How did that happen?
	I remember at the tail end of the communist period, I remember Raleigh City Council.
	I've mentioned this before on the show several times.
	But I was at a Raleigh City Council meeting and there was a woman who had just gotten back from Russia.
	And they were trying to push, in the little town of Raleigh, they were trying to push public transportation and a light rail system.
	That's stupid. And it would be like in Austin where you see these empty cars going around all the time.
	But anyway, she was trying to push that.
	She said, I just got back from Moscow, and it was wonderful.
	I could go anywhere in the city for just a nickel.
	That's what we need here.
	And I said, well, it cost them more than nickel.
	It cost them everything.
	It cost them all their freedom.
	It cost them their free market.
	And so things have eased up in Moscow.
	At the same time, we have people like that Raleigh City Councilwoman, and especially the people in the big Democrat states and the big Democrat cities, have taken on the idea of central planning.
	See, what she loved was not the transportation, per se, or the city.
	She loved the idea of having control of other people's transportation.
	And as these people have taken control politically, they have brought us a kind of Stalin-esque central planning.
	They've also brought, deliberately, chaos and disorder with their immigration policies and other policies here.
	They are turning us into the third world.
	And they're turning us into a former communist country with a central planning.
	So I guess, you know, as a matter of fact, if you had a time machine, and you can look at YouTube and you can look at some pictures that people took around the turn of the 20th century, you know, some of them going back to the 1890s, some of them 1910, 1916, things like that.
	They've gone back and they've corrected the movement.
	They've corrected the color so you can see them in color.
	They've changed it to smooth it out so that it's not jerky like people doing hand-cranked movies and stuff like that.
	But if you look at the people on the streets there and you look at the cities and how much cleaner, more civilized everything was at that point in time, it's our leadership that has taken us down this path.
	And we have allowed them to do that.
	So that is really, you know, the question is not whether or not Putin's leadership has taken them into this golden age.
	But the fact that our leadership has taken us back into this dystopian, totalitarian dark ages, that's where they're headed with us.
	But before I leave this, since we're talking about the technocrats, and since we're talking about Klaus Schwab, and we're talking about his post-humanism and all the rest of this stuff, there was an interesting article from Anthony of Westgate, Talking about psychic soldiers and the realm of demons, how the U.S. military is using out-of-body experiences to gain foreign intel.
	You know, all of my life, we have seen how the CIA is focused on psychedelics.
	We've seen how they've been trying to do remote viewing now.
	He writes this article saying yeah the the remote viewing Seemed to work for some of these things, but he also admits that you know says well There's a couple of these things with a guy knew what they were going to do he knew details that he had Gotten from remote viewing as we see from some stuff that was declassified about 20 years ago That was about a period of time decades before that But he says it's 50% type of thing
	But look, these folks believe in the occult.
	You understand? They may mock you for believing in a spiritual world.
	But the people in the Pentagon do believe in the occult.
	And they do focus on this, and I believe that they get technology from this.
	As I said before, I had some people who I talked to that had gone to Burning Man, and they said there was, again, they didn't have any proof of it.
	They said scuttlebutt-wise that there was this tent with all these billionaires from Silicon Valley, and they're doing, I think it's the DMT, is it?
	The one where you get the mechanical elves or the machine elves or whatever.
	Yeah, Travis is shaking his head, yeah.
	They're doing DMT and LSD and all these psychedelics.
	And they claim that they're meeting these entities who are giving them technology and stuff.
	You understand, when I talk about the CIA being satanic, I mean it literally.
	They are occultic, they are satanic.
	And they are the top of the heap.
	Again, people can talk about Freemasons and the Illuminati and all that.
	It's the CIA. It's these people who run our government.
	Totally evil. Totally occultic.
	They believe this stuff.
	This has always been their focus.
	My entire life I've seen this, evidence of this.
	And even when you go back and you look at Michael Aquino and how he is pushed by Oprah Winfrey.
	Now this is a clip where she had Michael Aquino on.
	He had created like his own satanic group.
	He called it the Temple of Set.
	And he goes on, he's got this little Eddie Munster haircut, and he's got a turtleneck and a medallion around his neck, and he's got his eyebrows, always would take his eyebrows, let them grow out, and tweeze them up into points on either side.
	And so here he is, this is what he looks like and what he sounded like, and he was on with Oprah Winfrey in 1988.
	I'm talking to Dr.
	Quino and his wife. You are a lieutenant colonel in the United States Army.
	Correct. Now, and how does the Army feel about you being head of the Temple of Set?
	The Army has known about my religion for the entire span of my Army career, which began in 1968.
	And there was a reasonable amount of curiosity, as there has been all the way along, with What exactly is this strange and unusual thing?
	And I've talked about it in much the same way that I've talked here today on your show about it.
	And other than that, the army has paid very little attention to it, the same as it would to anybody who is, say, a follower of Hinduism or of Buddhism or any other slightly unusual religion today.
	So you just go about your army duties and it's fine?
	Yeah, yeah, nothing at all.
	Guard says, what a shock that he would be on with Oprah, all of the allegations and suspicions about Oprah.
	Yeah, exactly. Not a shock.
	And here's the other thing, interesting, Guard.
	That was 1988.
	The scandal that Lieutenant Colonel Michael Aquino was involved in at the Presidio Preceded that by two years.
	And he's not just an army guy.
	He was an NSA guy.
	He was the guy who wrote a document that was declassified eventually called Mind Wars.
	And he talked about how they were going to use mind control techniques on the population.
	How they could even use things like extremely low frequency ELF to manipulate people.
	A lot of different things. He talked about how they had robots at the time and so forth.
	But mind war, yeah.
	An information war. Not just about disinformation, but many ways of doing that type of thing.
	He was with the NSA. And he was stationed at the Presidio in California.
	And to make a long story short, there was a chaplain there who had his grandson one day on campus.
	And his grandson said, that's Mr.
	Aquino. And he goes, how do you know him?
	Because he's got a room that's all black.
	So the chaplain was very upset about that.
	He went to the authorities and said, I think this guy is up to something.
	He might be up to something with my grandson.
	And they went there. They found that he did have a room that was all black, just as this kid had described.
	They began procedures to investigate him for pedophilia.
	And lo and behold, the NSA transferred him across the country.
	The jurisdiction of the local authorities.
	That was two years before Oprah interviewed him.
	You think Oprah knew? Who knows?
	Who knows? Far be it from me to cast aspersions on Oprah Winfrey.
	Anyway, during the Vietnam War, soldiers had unsuccessfully used witching rods to try to locate underground Viet Cong tunnels.
	Since then, psychic soldiers have successfully been gathering key intel from deep within Russian territory through astral traveling and remote viewing, says Anthony of Westgate.
	And then he talks about a friar, I guess, or a father.
	I'm not sure the FR abbreviation.
	Seraphim Rose. I wrote a book, The Soul After Death, and he talked about the Monroe Institute and how this Monroe Institute was actually hooked up with the intelligence people, came up with a tactic to do what they thought was going to be remote viewing,
	and how the Army did a report on it and tried to remove the occultic connotations By using the language of physical science.
	Army Commander Wayne McDonald, who states in the introduction of this 1983 document, that he found it necessary to use physics to bring the whole phenomenon of out-of-body states into the language of physical science to remove the stigma of occultic connotations.
	So you see the...
	1983, they're doing this stuff.
	I forget the date that Aquino wrote Mind Wars.
	He has the incident there at the Presidio in 1986.
	He goes on with Oprah Winfrey in 1988.
	And of course, this is 40 years ago, so we don't have to worry about that.
	Same thing that people were saying at the time about how evil and corrupt the CIA was in the 1960s.
	But don't worry, it doesn't happen anymore.
	We see that all the time. You find out the truth about what these people are up to decades after it happens, and then they immediately say, well, that was then.
	We fixed all that. We reformed it.
	We're not like that. Oh, yes, I think they are.
	And especially the Silicon Valley people.
	In the area that is seemingly closest to the material world, the Father Seraphim writes, Monroe encountered a gray-black area that was populated by nibbling and tormenting beings.
	This, he thinks, may be the border of hell, rather like the Hades region.
	You see, this is stuff that's going back to the 1980s.
	Now you've got people who...
	Call themselves Psychonauts.
	Not nuts, but knots.
	N-A-U-T-S. Doing DMT and comparing notes because they said, look, all these different people are having very similar experiences with these machine elves and stuff.
	This book, by the way, was where you start seeing these terminologies that come out.
	The astral plane, remote viewing, and all this kind of stuff.
	This all goes back to the 1980s.
	But there's no evidence that anything really has changed with him.
	He puts into his statements here, he puts it into an Orthodox Christian perspective.
	Seraphim Rose says, As Orthodox Christian observers, we do not need to know how much of his experience was real and how much of it was spectacles and illusions engineered for him.
	By fallen spirits.
	Deception is so much a part of the aerial realm that there's no point in even trying to unravel its precise forms.
	How much of it is deception?
	How much of it is real? Since the 1960s, the out-of-body experience has been weaponized by the largest military force in the world.
	The integration of these occultic practices into mainstream culture is underway and is surely a sign of the end of the age.
	Again, what do you think all of these different movements and cultural stuff are coming from?
	CIA has been very heavily involved in seeding ideas about things as seemingly far apart from them as art, architecture, culture.
	These things, feminism, all the rest of these types of things, these are seminal ideas that are being pushed out of the government.
	These are satanic ideas.
	This is a part of this.
	We should understand, they certainly believe this stuff.
	The people who are working on this as well.
	And so, before I take a break, the open AI stuff, and Sam Altman, as I mentioned before, Looking to get trillions, anywhere between five and seven trillion dollars of investment from giant corporations and from governments because we do have this fascist world governance that is taking shape.
	Alliance of this concentration of wealth and these technological companies as well as a concentration of power in the governments.
	So Sam Altman is going around the Wall Street Journal reports that he is in talks with investors, including the United Arab Emirates government.
	And of course, this world government summit is taking place in Dubai, the capital of the UAE and the biggest city in the UAE. They are positioning themselves right at the center of this new world order that they're trying to create.
	Fundraising plans are intended to solve the constraints to the growth of artificial intelligence, particularly the limited supply of graphics processing units that are needed.
	And so the question is, when they look at the constraints, are the constraints merely the limitations of speed of these GPUs?
	I think the real constraints are going to be energy-based.
	That's one of the things that they don't want to talk about.
	You know, when they push the CBDC and Biden put out his orders to the deep state, which is 100% under the presidency, by the way.
	You know, Donald Trump.
	Oh, we're going to take care of the deep state.
	Put me in again and I'll take care of the deep state.
	Well, he's already been commander in chief of the deep state for four years.
	He didn't do a thing about it.
	Didn't do a thing about it.
	All of those bureaucracies are under the president.
	So when Biden did his order about CBDCs March of 2022, or was it 2023?
	Was it last year that happened?
	I guess maybe it was last year.
	I can't. Anyway, the years are flying by.
	When he did that, he broke it into four different areas.
	And of course, one of those four, besides the obvious stuff, you know, how are we going to completely redesign the financial system?
	How are we going to implement this computer code?
	How are we going to compel people to use it?
	So he gave stuff to law enforcement to be able to compel people to use CBDC. But the fourth one was to sell the idea that it was going to use less power than crypto mining.
	It's going to be good for the climate.
	Well, you know what's not good for the climate?
	Artificial intelligence. But they never talk about that.
	What's not good for the climate is the NSA. Spying on everybody, keeping everybody's records forever.
	That massive amount of power usage that the spy people do, that the artificial intelligence people do, that's never talked about.
	That is going to be one of the constraining things.
	But anyway, his goals would require convincing governments...
	Industry partners and investors around the globe to participate.
	So far, Altman has met with the UAE's Sheik, with SoftBank CEO, and with chip makers like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, one of the bigger semiconductor manufacturers.
	By the way, you know, if they want to have a war in China, that might be a real hitch in their get-along.
	Depending on if it's a literal war, you know, Taiwan is such a big supplier of very state-of-the-art ships.
	The amount of investment required would eclipse the current size of the entire semiconductor industry.
	This is how big they're talking about going.
	More than all of the electronics everywhere.
	Just into artificial intelligence.
	That should concern you.
	About this.
	The amount of investment required to eclipse all of the semiconductor industry combined.
	He's also discussed the idea with Microsoft's CEO. Satya Nadella is the guy from India.
	And so the government is more than happy to fund these AI tools.
	As Debbie Lerman of Brownstone points out, they're doing it because they want a hole of internet surveillance and censorship.
	That's how they get their control.
	They get their control by surveilling and, you know, by centralized control of our money, of our communications, and things like that.
	She said, I feel scared, very scared.
	Internet-wide surveillance and censorship enabled by the unimaginably vast computational power of artificial intelligence is here.
	It's not a futuristic dystopia.
	It's happening now. And these people want to escalate it.
	Escalated even faster.
	A tool powerful enough to surveil everything that is said and done on the internet, or large portions of it, is becoming available to the government to monitor all of us all of the time.
	And based on that monitoring, the government, and any organization or company that the government partners with, can then use the same tool to suppress science, to shut down whatever speech it doesn't like, And of course, if you go back and look at the geospatial intelligence, which is tied in with the internet from the very beginning of its rollout in the 1990s, they're very focused on politics and on religion.
	That's really what they're focused on.
	Why religion? Well, they know.
	These are people who are demonic, occultic people.
	That's one of the reasons they're focusing on the religion aspect of it.
	You can understand the political stuff, even if you're just a materialist or atheist.
	But you need to understand the spiritual dimension of the CIA and our government.
	They can also shut down any activity that is linked to the internet.
	Banking, buying, selling, teaching, learning, entertaining, connecting to each other, traveling.
	If the government-controlled AI does not like what you or your kids say in a tweet or an email, it can shut all that down for you.
	And of course, when I interviewed the individual who ran briefly for president so he could focus people's attention on CBDC, he begins his book about it by talking about that very thing.
	You know, not too distant future, and unfortunately, the repercussions that happen to the head of the household when he makes a statement on social media that the artificial intelligence takes an exception to and how they weaponize that using CBDC. She goes on to say,
	the U.S. House Select Committee for the Weaponization of the Federal Government was formed more than a year ago, January of 2023, and And she said, unfortunately, the work of the committee is viewed, even by its own members, as largely a political show, as I've always said. It's a dog and pony show.
	Just like Trey Gowdy and his Benghazi hearings and all the rest.
	It's just for show. It's just for show.
	Nevertheless, in its investigations, this committee has uncovered some astonishing documents, and these documents have crucial and terrifying all of society implications.
	And let me just say, that's part of the show as well.
	That is also part of the show.
	By the way, another comment and tip from Michelle Obamaman.
	I love it when you talk about keeping it local.
	It motivated me to make an anti-red-blue hairfreaks Twitter.
	So, that is true.
	You know, local is where we're going to have the most...
	We may not be able to do what we want to do, but you have to look at where you've got the best shot.
	And there's absolutely no way that you can't...
	There's no way that you can argue that you don't have your best shot locally.
	That's where you're going to have the most effect.
	And they know it. They know that they have to implement their global designs at the local level, and that's where we're going to stop them.
	That's where the battle is going to be.
	So you better understand where the battlefield is going to be.
	You better understand who's on your side and who's not on your side.
	Or you're certainly not going to win.
	But when I look at these documents, so she says, all right, so they got this subcommittee.
	On the weaponization of the federal government, they've uncovered some of these documents.
	I understand they're not going to do anything.
	They're just going to have show hearings so they can get on TV, but they're not going to ever do anything about it.
	That's the nature of Congress.
	That's the nature of the Republican Party.
	The Democrats, on the other hand, will do evil things, but the Republicans will say, well, we're here to oppose them, but they never do.
	These documents have been revealed, however.
	She thinks that's a positive thing.
	I'm not so sure about that either.
	You know, when you look at the Snowden documents, there was some interesting tidbits that came out of it, but it was really nothing new.
	We all knew what the government was doing.
	It's just you wind up with the receipts for it, the documents for it.
	And as I said at the time when it came out, it was in 2013, I said, all right, so now we got this stuff.
	So what are we going to do about it?
	If we don't do anything about it, and of course our representatives in Congress are not going to do anything about it, the Democrats and Republicans do not want to reform the system one way or the other.
	They've got their reasons.
	They want to use it against their opponents.
	They want a strong military.
	They want this surveillance state.
	As a matter of fact, they are beholden to it.
	So they're not going to do anything about it.
	And I said, if the public sees all of this stuff, and goes, meh, you know, what's on TV tonight?
	If that's a response that people have, that's exactly what they want.
	Because in a sense, then, in their eyes, they have shown you what they're doing, And by not opposing it, you have assented to it.
	You've given it your assent.
	That's one of the reasons why you've got people like Klaus Schwab and others who are out there, you know, monologuing like a supervillain at the end of a superhero movie, telling you everything that they've done, everything they're going to do.
	Because if you don't push back on it, then they take that as consent.
	So, these documents have crucial and terrifying all of society implications, she says.
	This is a subcommittee's interim report.
	They said that AI-powered tools, funded by the NSF, Can be used to help social media platforms perform censorship activities without having to actually make the decisions on what should be censored.
	Travis, pull up this article, this Brownstone article, Government Funds AI Tools for Whole-of-Life Internet Surveillance and Censorship, because there is, scroll down to the chart that's further down.
	And there it is.
	That's the one I want people to see.
	Notice how there is a one-way flow of information.
	It comes from the government, from the National Science Foundation, this particular case, a tool that they have created.
	And then it flows to universities and to nonprofits.
	It flows to federally funded censorship and propaganda tools.
	It flows to big tech.
	And what they openly say about this is, Is that this tool, they call it WISEDEX, D-E-X, WISEDEX, funded by the National Science Foundation, NSF. These people are writing checks that we should be removing their money.
	We should be making these organizations like NSF, we should make them truly NSF, like, you know, when your check balances, insufficient funds, right?
	Yeah. We need to make sure that the National Science Foundation, the NIH, all these different non-constitutional organizations ought to have their funding cut.
	That's what Congress should be doing instead of holding these show trials.
	Just shut them down. And we can have some, you know, release the documents and let some historians go through them.
	We don't need to have your show trials.
	Your job is to shut the funding down to these things.
	To make them truly NSF. Our misinformation service, they said, helps policymakers at platforms who want to push responsibility for difficult judgments to someone outside of the company by externalizing the difficult responsibility of censorship.
	And this is the way it has always worked.
	And this is one of the reasons why The Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the biggest libertarian think tank, the biggest conservative think tank, I no longer have any trust in them or respect for them because going back now six years and even before that, you know, six years when it came to a head, but it was even before that, they were always making excuses for this.
	Well, you know, these companies are just doing what they want to do.
	No, the companies are doing what they were told to do.
	To have happened by the government.
	The government is not allowed to do censorship.
	It's very clear, according to constitutional amendments.
	And so what they do is they get other people to do it and pretend that those other people are doing it on their own initiative.
	Meanwhile, with the internal communications between the government and the companies, they're saying, we'll decide so you don't have to.
	And that will give you plausible deniability.
	And this is really where they're doubling down on this now because there has been no accountability for this type of censorship that is running through the big tech companies that we know is coming from the government.
	And so since we have not come after the people in government who have pushed this stuff, the people in government are saying to the big tech companies, well, it's okay.
	We'll take the hit.
	You know, you just do what we tell you, and we'll protect you.
	That's really what all the CISPA, ACTA, SOPA, PIPA stuff was about for the longest time.
	They got it passed.
	It was CISA. They took the P out.
	The P was for protection.
	The protection of these companies from being sued by the public, whose privacy they were marketing, whose privacy they were violating.
	We're going to protect you from lawsuits.
	And that's really what CISA's major function was about.
	It's supposed to be cyber security protection, but it was about giving protection to their surrogates who are doing their bidding.
	So yeah, it is a fascist government corporate conspiracy for total surveillance and censorship.
	And they don't even try to hide it anymore.
	And even after it comes out, the Republicans won't do anything about it, right?
	They won't do anything. This should be grounds for them to cut the funding to the NSF. They won't do it.
	Now, they just passed an impeachment of Mayorkas.
	So what? Immediately, the people in Senate said it's dead on arrival.
	And I said that before. I said, they're going to go through this whole thing.
	They're going to look at us.
	We've just done... And sure enough, right after it happened, Lauren Boebert puts his face, see, we're doing our job.
	No, you're not. You're not even close to doing your job.
	You're just a showboater.
	All these Republicans are just doing this stuff for show.
	If they really wanted to stop this stuff, they'd be doing very different things, like cutting off their funding.
	As Chip Roy said, oh, okay, so you're going to impeach him?
	Oh, that'll show him right, but you're still going to give him money to continue to do.
	You're going to continue to fund him and his department for things that you say are worthy of impeachment.
	You're not going to cut the funds off.
	That's the one thing they could do.
	And that's one thing they will not do, because it's all for show, folks.
	Washington is gone.
	So she said, this is an extraordinary statement.
	Look at this. We're going to externalize the difficult responsibilities and things like that.
	It explicitly equates misinformation service with censorship.
	Which we knew. It refers to censorship as a responsibility.
	And it says that the role of AI is to externalize responsibility for censorship.
	In other words, to give them plausible deniability to give them a cover.
	She said all this should end the illusion that governments around the world are calling countering misinformation and hate speech that this is not straight up censorship.
	But she says here's where you need to be concerned about this because of AI's leverage now.
	By bringing artificial intelligence into this, and again, it's intelligence from the standpoint of surveillance.
	It's intelligence from the standpoint of spying.
	So what AI, what does AI bring to the party?
	Well, it means that there's no manpower limits.
	The old East German Stasi, they had more than half of the people spying on the rest of the population.
	There's no manpower limits on all this.
	They can also say that we're not responsible for any of this.
	In the same way that, you know, the corporations are doing this, they're doing the bidding of the government, well, the government can say, well, it's not me that's doing it, it's the artificial intelligence must be a bug or something, you know, can't do anything about that.
	And of course when they create their autonomous killer robots, their autonomous killer drones, and they wipe out cities or something like that, they'll say, well, it's a computer bug.
	It wasn't me.
	I didn't have anything to do with that.
	It's wonderful how it gives them plausible deniability and lets them pretend that they're not responsible.
	And then, of course, there is no recourse for grievances.
	And you'll have the people who will actually believe that the artificial intelligence is objective, that it is fair, that it is all-knowing.
	And we know that's going to be the case because look at the arguments from authority that were used over and over again and worked on so many people worldwide.
	Well, these are people from the Imperial College of London, or they're from Harvard, or they're from MIT, or whatever.
	And you've got people who are, Fauci, he's been head of the NIAID for the longest time, and these governors, these public health bureaucrats, and the president, they're all telling us that this is the argument from authority.
	No, no, no, I'm not going to show you what I'm doing.
	I'm not going to show you any data.
	And so this is the way they're going to roll this thing out.
	And whenever people see computer printouts, this is something I've seen all my life.
	People just, well, the computer said that?
	It's like, yeah, the computer that was programmed by somebody to say that.
	The programming now is being done by people that they've hired at minimum wage to go in and build in biases into the artificial intelligence.
	So you want to get your chat GPT and see what that thing says?
	Well, it's heavily biased.
	Heavily biased towards misinformation from them and censorship of the truth or any inquiry.
	So, it is here now.
	And here is the article, another article of it.
	Google vows to use AI models and to work with EU's anti-disinformation groups and global fact-checking groups to censor misinformation and hate.
	No, they're the ones who are generating the disinformation, the misinformation.
	They're the ones who hate, and they don't have the facts on their side.
	We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com.
	And, check out our other videos.
	Thanks for watching.
	Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch, and
	you you So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a commentary on this.
	So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a commentary on this.
	So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a commentary on this.
	So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a commentary on this.
	Making Sense.
	Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk about the tens of thousands of people who have been secretly euthanized in order to boost these statistics and to pretend that there is a COVID pandemic.
	And this is beyond just another aspect of, you know, we've seen people, well, you got a PCR test, they die from neglect, neglect from a respiratory illness that could have been treated.
	They're denied safe and effective treatment.
	Perhaps they are put on a do not resuscitate list.
	Perhaps they're put on a ventilator to kill them.
	Perhaps they've been given remdesivir.
	And now we have yet another example of the hospital death protocols that were put out by these globalist puppets from Boris Johnson to Pierre Trudeau, not Pierre Trudeau, Justin Trudeau.
	Shows how old I am.
	Immediately wanted to call him Pierre.
	But yeah, Justin Trudeau to Donald Trump.
	Tens of thousands of elderly people murdered in order to boost mortality rates.
	The data produced for the report, this comes from Slay News, indicated that people were being euthanized using a fatal injection of midazolam.
	M-I-D-A-Z-O-L-A-M. This is a new one for me.
	I'm not sure I should have looked up how to pronounce this.
	The cause of their death is then listed as COVID. To indicate that the virus was killing more elderly people than it was.
	Maybe it was a virus, even.
	The explosive data from the report was made public by Australian politician Craig Kelly, National Director of the United Australia Party.
	The report obtained official UK government data on death rates and causes.
	The data appears to show that vast numbers of elderly people were murdered with an injection of the end-of-life drug, midazolam, I guess.
	Just call it Mephistopheles.
	Mephistoprone or whatever, the abortion pill.
	But no, it's a hospital death protocol.
	And so this is Australian political party.
	Got a document from the UK government.
	So this is what was happening in the UK, reported by the Australians.
	but this is a global agenda.
	A hospital death protocol.
	They were paid extra money by the Trump administration to do this type of thing.
	You label them as a COVID patient, you treat them as a COVID patient, you get them on, you know, $13,000 plus a 20% bonus on everything.
	Oh, and if you get them on a ventilator, we'll give you another $39,000.
	He incentivized, incentivized killing people through the hospitals.
	And then Biden said, we're gonna take all that away if you don't inject all the nurses and doctors.
	And not only that, but we'll also take away all of your Medicare, Medicaid stuff.
	That was his promise. So we went from bribery by Trump to blackmail by Biden.
	Kelly declared that this exposes the greatest crime of the century.
	These deaths were then falsely blamed on COVID, which was the basis of the public fear campaigns used to justify lockdowns and mass-mandated injections of the public, including children, with an experimental medical intervention that had zero long-term safety data.
	I pushed these people so hard, so hard, they didn't want to do it.
	I pushed them. I pushed them to do what?
	To do what, Donald? To skip the testing, right?
	Skip the testing.
	This paper shows that the UK spike in deaths wrongly attributed to COVID-19 in April of 2020 was not due to a virus, which was largely absent, but due to the widespread use of, again, I don't know if I'm pronouncing this correctly, midazolam injections, which were statistically very highly correlated with a coefficient of over 90%.
	Correlated with excess deaths in all regions of England during 2020.
	Just like the ventilator. The ventilator was just under 90% of the people that would die.
	They were given it. But you know, this drug, they could give it to them and 90% of the people would die.
	The widespread and persistent use of this suggests a possible policy of systemic euthanasia.
	Of course. Especially on the elderly.
	We don't have to pay them pensions either.
	We can use them, we can kill them, not pay the pensions, and we can get justification for a pandemic and for medical martial law.
	It's a win-win-win situation for them, isn't it?
	And so, we have seen for the longest time the failure of people on the left to be able to identify the true causes of these deaths.
	On the right, people understand the true causes of the death, the hospital death protocol, mass murder, the mass murder of the poisonous shots, but they won't connect it to Trump or the Republicans.
	So, again, the PCR tests, the ventilators, now we've got another smoking gun.
	I would not be surprised if it continues on from here.
	They're going to find some other things as well.
	I always said from the beginning, I said, no, it's not excess deaths from a virus.
	Oh, yes, there are excess deaths.
	I was like, well, not from the virus.
	From them killing people in the hospital.
	They're murdering people.
	Democide. Death by government.
	Moderna trial is now injecting its first UK patients with experimental mRNA cancer vaccines.
	Oh, there you go. Even as they find SV40, cancer-causing contaminant, present in these things, and they say, well, we don't care about that.
	And, of course, the U.K., as well as the U.S., these five-eye nations, what do they have in common?
	Well, they're intelligence agencies.
	They're occultic intelligent agencies.
	Always willing to kill people.
	The first UK patients have been injected with an experimental mRNA cancer therapy.
	Where did they do it? At the Imperial College of London.
	Wait a minute. I don't remember that name.
	Those are the people who came up with that bogus simulation saying we're all going to die.
	And Trump is using that to talk about how many lives he saved.
	According to this simulation from the Imperial College of London, these lying, murdering people, look it, I saved everybody from this.
	So therapy, they call it a therapy.
	So which is it? Right?
	A therapy is something very different from a vaccine.
	A vaccine is supposedly to prevent you from getting something.
	A therapy is supposed to cure whatever you've got.
	And they have very different protocols for how they test that.
	I've talked about that in the past, you know.
	One of the reasons that you do a long-term testing of a vaccine is that the theory that the vaccine is supposed to prevent something, you can't expose people directly to a disease.
	When you had people say, I'll be a volunteer, you know, give me the shot and then expose me to COVID. Should we tell them that we don't have the virus?
	Oh, we can't do that because that would be unethical.
	We can't expose you to something that we have said is the most deadly pathogen ever known to man.
	It's going to kill us worldwide, so we've got to do things that we've never done before, so we can't expose you to that.
	That would be unethical. Sorry, not going to do it.
	That would have put to rest once and for all if it's safe or effective, but they didn't want to do it.
	These people who have such high ethical standards, you really think it was the ethics or you think that they didn't have the virus to expose it to them?
	And to do a control group, right?
	You'd have to do a control group as well.
	Now, what they do, the reason that these things are different, when you have, they have the three phases of testing and all this other kinds of, they do animal tests, supposedly.
	Then they do a phase one test where they take...
	Some human guinea pigs, very few of them, and give them the treatment or the vaccine, see if they drop dead, as they did with the Trump shots.
	They didn't have people drop dead.
	But anyway, that would be the next stage of testing.
	But if it looks good at that point, then they say, okay, if it's therapeutic, it's going to heal something, then let's get the people who already have this disease, and we will do a double-blind test.
	We'll separate them into two groups.
	Nobody will know who's getting a placebo or who's getting the therapy.
	And then we'll see if it helps.
	And if it still looks safe, and if it looks like it helped, then they do it again with a much larger group.
	With a vaccine, what they do is first they do the animal testing, supposedly.
	Then they do the phase one testing, supposedly.
	And then they will take a control group and have two different control groups.
	One of them that gets the placebo, the other one gets the vaccine.
	Then they just let them circulate around.
	For a couple of years.
	Because they don't want to directly expose them to it.
	And then they just assume that both of these groups have had equal exposure to whatever they're trying to prevent them from getting.
	And then they repeat it with a bigger group.
	And they circulate around at random for several years.
	And so the time is critical.
	Since they're not exposing them directly to anything.
	The time is absolutely critical.
	So these vaccines are totally untested.
	So here they're calling this cancer vaccine.
	They're calling it a therapy.
	And again, it is a partnership with the Imperial College of London and Moderna.
	The usual suspects.
	The mRNA jab works by presenting common markers of tumors to the patient's immune system to train the immune system to recognize and to fight cancer cells expressing these markers.
	Okay, so that's the basis for which they say that it is a vaccine because it's about training your immune system.
	Which again takes us back to that seminal lie of Fauci that he's saying, well, people, if they've tested positive and they've got a respiratory illness and we would say, yes, they have COVID, But I'm not going to say they've got immunity.
	They've been exposed to the real thing.
	And so this has always been about, what, training the immune system.
	That's the basic theory. And even that basic theory of vaccines was denied by Fauci.
	Oh, no, no.
	You can't get natural immunity.
	Natural immunity doesn't work. Well, if natural immunity doesn't work, then your simulated exposure to a disease isn't going to work either.
	If the actual disease was handled by the person's immune system, and then you expose them to a fake simulated artificial version of that, that's not going to work either.
	The real thing is going to do a better job, but they just denied all of the theory of vaccines because it was never about a virus.
	It was never about a pandemic.
	It was never about medicine or science.
	It was about politics.
	It was about compliance.
	It was about a globalist agenda, and we know who enforced that from the very beginning.
	Now, Dr. Michael Yadin, former Vice President and Chief Scientist of Pfizer's Allergy and Respiratory Division, told LifeSite News that That, as he's argued in affidavits for legal cases regarding COVID mRNA shots,
	he says, causing the body to express non-self proteins axiomatically drives lethal autoimmune attack upon every cell which responds to the injected genetic instructions.
	The genetic code injection.
	Also, if the goal is to present common markers of cancer cells to the immune system, then there are some assumptions to check.
	You know, just like if you sanity check what they're telling you about, well, natural immunity, that's not a thing.
	You can't get natural immunity.
	You've got to get synthetic immunity.
	None of this stuff holds up to the sniff test of logic.
	So he says, so why is the patient's immune system not already responding to these markers in their own cancer?
	And if it cannot respond to these markers in its own cancer, because the immune system is somehow compromised, then they will also respond poorly to this therapy.
	So why inject them?
	In other words, these markers are already there.
	Why inject them with some other stuff that's got markers in it?
	With some mRNA stuff?
	If they can't handle the real stuff, what's the point of injecting them?
	And it's very similar to what they were saying in terms of, well, you've got to get the vaccine.
	You can't have natural immunity.
	We're not going to give you an excuse on these mandated vaccines because, you know, according to our definitions, you've already had COVID. Dr.
	Yadin pointed out that furthermore, he said, there is nothing about this treatment which restricts delivery only to cancerous tissue.
	After injection, it is as likely to be taken up by healthy tissue as those in which cancer has been identified.
	In the case of the mRNA jabs, multiple scientists found that their mRNA-induced spike protein spreads throughout the body, causing inflammation in various organs.
	For example, in 2021, Dr.
	Ryan Cole displayed lab images comparing normal bodily tissues to those who had not received the COVID jab and the inflamed tissues of those who had received it.
	And so Dr. Yadin added, That if you then also make this with lipid nanoparticle technology as the other mRNA shots, and again, this is Moderna who's doing it, then it should be expected to accumulate in reproductive organs.
	And that cannot be safe, he says.
	Well, this article from Brownstone, Thomas Buckley, headline says, Trump's COVID response cast a very long shadow over him.
	And it certainly does.
	He says Donald Trump has a COVID problem.
	No matter how he wishes, it never happened.
	The pointless, from a health perspective, and the tyrannically devastating pandemic response that he launched in March 2020 is on him.
	He is responsible for that decision.
	Bravo! I'm glad to see somebody else saying what I've been saying for the longest time.
	Look, both Biden and Trump They are mass murderers.
	They are traitors to the Constitution.
	The real insurrection in our country was not on January the 6th.
	It wasn't done by Trump.
	It wasn't done by Nancy Pelosi, as Trump just said this last week.
	There was a real insurrection in this country.
	And it happened on March 13th, 2020.
	That was when the money was unleashed.
	For the statewide tyranny that they had been trained and laid the groundwork for.
	This meme that's going around, warning to all medical practitioners, doctors and nurses, I was just carrying out orders as not a legal defense.
	And by the way, the reverse Nuremberg thing that you hear from Fauci and others, I didn't order anybody.
	The nonsense that MAGA is putting out there about Trump, he didn't order anybody to do anything.
	He paid them to do it, just like he paid Hillary Clinton to come to his wedding, right?
	He knows. You get people to do what you want when you pay them, and we've seen this over and over again.
	Now he's saying, I'm not going to pay any schools.
	I'm going to cut off the money if they do this training stuff, which he has always been an advocate of.
	Anyway, notice.
	I was carrying out orders.
	Just following orders is not a legal defense.
	You will be on trial for war crimes, and you will be held accountable.
	Your duty is to inform your patient.
	Number one, the vaccine is experimental.
	Number two, there's no guarantee of immunity.
	Number three, you can still spread the disease.
	Number four, vaccine damage and death.
	Now, by the way, I don't hold out my breath for any Nuremberg trial here on this earth.
	These people answer before God.
	That's far worse.
	Far worse. We take comfort in that.
	For those of us, and I haven't lost anybody, I'll say for those of you, members of the audience who have lost family, loved ones, understand, God will dispense justice.
	So, sometime between March 9th and March 16th, most likely about March the 10th, Trump went from being relatively rational in his response to agreeing to a monumental societal disruption.
	Trump changed his mind, or had it changed for him?
	And that is the key to Trump's COVID problem.
	Either he stands by his decision full-throatedly, which is what he has done so far, or he admits that he, the master of the deal, got rolled.
	He can't do that. That's why he continued to cheer his vaccines, and he stopped doing that at the warning of all of his sycophants in the press, Alex Jones and Wayne Allen Root and all this.
	Stopped! Take, you know, stop bragging about this.
	We know that it killed people. Stop associating yourself with that.
	They're complicit too, by the way.
	They're complicit in that.
	Telling people it was sugar water, Alex?
	Anyway... So he cheers his vaccine.
	He cheers his lockdowns.
	He cheers, to this day, if you back him into a corner, he'll tell you how many millions of lives he thinks he saved.
	He's not going to back down from that.
	He's not going to back down from his hospital death protocol either.
	The Biden camp could blame Trump for his catastrophic decision, but it won't because they doubled down on the policy construct themselves.
	The Trump camp won't call out Biden for the devastating vaccine mandates and the continued social closures because they started it.
	This is what I've said for the longest time.
	I'm glad to see somebody else saying this.
	I call it like the Agatha Christie, Murder on the Orient Express, except this is Murder on the Warp Speed Express.
	Both the Republicans and the Democrats.
	Not just Trump and Biden.
	All the Republicans, all the Democrats had a hand in this.
	They all had a hand in it, and they're not going to blow the whistle on the other person, as he points out.
	The situation is somewhat akin to the mutually assured destruction doctrine of the Cold War.
	We won't push the nuclear button if you don't push the nuclear button.
	It's all about war crimes, and they understand it.
	Considering his core supporters, Trump should be flying around the country loudly talking about closed schools and churches and cops getting fired, but people being forced to leave the military, families divided, friendships ended.
	But he can't, and he doesn't need to.
	Because these people are willingly blind to how this whole thing works.
	They do not want to give him any responsibility.
	Why? They're in denial.
	Someday that will eventually end.
	It's kind of like stages of grief, right?
	No, no, no. I'm not going to die.
	This illness will not result in my death.
	Until you realize at some point, yeah, it is.
	These people will not go there because they've placed all of their hopes in government.
	They've placed all their hopes in a man.
	They've placed all their hopes in a man who betrayed them and a government that is distant and betraying them in Washington.
	And because that's the only thing they have hope in, they are not going to admit that it's corrupt and hopeless.
	Biden could be eviscerating Trump for lax financial oversight, for a whole host of other pandemic response problems, but he's not going to do it because this administration not only didn't do any better, it did worse.
	And the people who gained from the pandemic response tend to support the administration and its policies.
	By the way, he doesn't go to the next stage of this, which I do.
	And I say that's why it was necessary to have Trump in place.
	And it concerns me a great deal when I look at the momentum of Trump and the weakness of Biden that they're setting this thing up because that's going to be the next big thing.
	They're going to use Trump, who puts his people to sleep, and the sycophants in the press who will tell you, don't worry, it's sugar water, as Alex Jones did.
	So, yeah, government workers, progressive academics, they're going to go along with this, even if it was Trump doing it, because they did when it was Trump doing it.
	Because that's what they want.
	The people who would oppose this shut down and go along with it because they're told that Trump is playing 4D chess.
	So the people who would oppose it, anyone else doing it, go along with it.
	The polls show that most of the public said, well, we're over COVID. But that's not the right question.
	The right question is what happened and what's going to be done about it.
	This person says, if Trump wins, maybe we could do something about it.
	No, this is where they lose it.
	This is where they lose it.
	The person looks at all this stuff that happened and says, well, maybe if we do the same thing again, we'll get different results.
	Insanity. If Trump wins, maybe he'll do something about it.
	Maybe he could make a true deep dive into the deep state.
	He ran the deep state for four years.
	He was commander-in-chief of the deep state for four years.
	Trump has no principles except for himself, a deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting except out of his own perceived self-interest or revenge.
	He is not going to altruistically go back and say, you know, let's fix this.
	Because as soon as he started attacking these people...
	And doing something about it.
	They would do the same things that, you know, if he attacked Biden for what Biden did.
	Same thing that Biden would do.
	I mean, the same logic that he had at the beginning of this article, or this Brownstone article.
	He just completely loses it when he starts to talk about Trump.
	He's under the Trump derangement, delusional syndrome.
	He's going to work to make himself top dog.
	He's going to work to make himself top dog in the global establishment as he did the first time, except this time it's going to be no restraints whatsoever because it'll be his final term.
	And at this point, this is where the article goes off the rails.
	How could our savior Trump save the world?
	Look, he's, he's not going to somehow.
	He starts to play all these what-ifs.
	What if he did this, and what if he did that?
	And then at the very end of this article from Brownstone, this disclaimer.
	Note, while this piece focused on the failure of Trump, that act, while significant, should be weighed against the entirety of its presidency and the possibility of a new term in office.
	What?! Even though they pull back the second part of it and kind of show him as a potential savior.
	It's absolutely absurd.
	Absolutely absurd.
	This disclaimer that they put in there for the Fuhrer.
	We must not criticize the Fuhrer.
	They're concerned. Even Brownstone is concerned about losing audience and support if they tell the truth about Trump.
	Well, let's put the failure of the last year, the colossal failure of the last year.
	I mean, you know what? This is like saying that Hitler got the trains to run on time, first couple of years that he was in office, you know, and then he tried to destroy the world.
	That's what that's equivalent to.
	And quite frankly, his first three years are nothing to boast about.
	I started attacking him as soon as he became president because he wasn't stopping the wars, because he wasn't protecting the border.
	And then he started his tax program for the ultra-rich corporations with so much money that Apple was ashamed of what he gave them and how he put all of his effort into building up the stock market.
	And then in 2020, he declared that Main Street was not essential.
	Wall Street still was.
	And you look at the amount of money that he unleashed there in 2020, but even before that, He had supported vaccines without informed consent.
	He supported vaccination programs against children, against their medical wishes, against their ethical wishes.
	He had done gun control by executive order.
	How many things can he do that you're going to give a pass to?
	This is pathetic, quite frankly.
	There's some really good articles that come out of Brownstone.
	But I tell you... They are still suffering from the MAGA delusion, a strong delusion.
	Well, we have Sergey and Jason already, or Serge, I should say.
	He's going with Serge the Purge, so I guess that's how he pronounces it.
	And they have done a documentary, Jason Barker and Serge the Purge, I've done a documentary going down to the border.
	Serge went down there. The two of them put this together.
	We're going to talk to them about what they saw.
	Before we bring them on we're going to play a trailer for their documentary On my journey down to the border in Lukeville, Arizona I saw things that at first glance Didn't seem to be anything new in comparison to all the footage that I had seen in the news prior
	Trash everywhere, stray dogs in the desert, and Border Patrol monitoring the area.
	The Tucson sector's border patrol chief posted this on X. Over 17,000 migrants were apprehended within the last week.
	This is the worst week we've ever seen at the border.
	That our federal government has not only helped fund and facilitate illegal aliens crossing the border, But also building a case that the federal and state government had malicious intent premeditated months prior to the biggest illegal border crossing in one sitting in Arizona.
	Looks like now it's business as usual, you know?
	Yeah, well, the border's opened back up, and I think Cobb's called the state police back up.
	There. That's the road right there.
	Puerto Blanco Drive is the road that the guy had mentioned.
	I searched this for hours looking for...
	An aerial shot.
	I discovered a secret staging ground about a mile into the desert that was being monitored by Border Patrol.
	Could this have been strategically positioned to take migrants from the official crossing and transport them via the Border Patrol road into the middle of the desert in an effort to spit them back out on the state highway in buses through stealth as if it never happened?
	Additionally, the governor billed the federal government for $512 million And reverse for ongoing border operations.
	So I don't see a 500, I don't see a half a billion dollars being spent there.
	They're spending some of that money to get them out of their state as quickly as possible.
	Soros made his money by destabilizing small nations.
	Let's just say I was great at the stock market and everybody believed in the shots that I called.
	So I say, hey, I go buy a bunch of Apple stock and then I say, hey, Apple's going to go up and then everybody else buys the stock which artificially drives it up and then I sell mine.
	So I just made a bunch of money off my speculation.
	That's kind of what Soros did with small nations' currencies, and he destabilized those nations by doing that.
	They've only gotten to the point now where they can actually destabilize the U.S.
	The only successful way you could cross would be with a plan and a helping hand on the other side.
	Which leads me to believe that this response at the Lukeville border was not reactionary, but on the contrary premeditated and organized by the federal and state government to facilitate and aid the illegal crossing of over 17,000 aliens at the US-Mexico border.
	That's a preview to a documentary that Surge the Purge has put together. Also Jason Barker working with him. We're going to be talking to the two of them right now. Again Jason Barker, you can find a foxhole report. Surge the Purge has his own media outlets and you can find links to a growing network of I think honest, trustworthy, alternative media people at the Knights of the
	Angry Tiger and the Knights of the Storm report that he does with Jason Barker.
	And they're putting together indices of people who do their best to get everything right and to tell what is happening regardless of where the chips fall.
	And so you can find all that stuff at thenightsofthestorm.com.
	They have a... A list there of people and the times that they're broadcast on.
	Of course, they'll take you to guard and many other people.
	But joining us now is Jason Barker and Serge the Purge.
	Thanks, guys, for coming on. You had about, the documentary is what, about 30 minutes or so?
	And so I wanted to play the trailer instead of the full documentary because people can find the full documentary and then find you guys as well.
	But just, you know, we want to give them an idea of what this is about.
	Kind of, you know, tease it as a trailer would, as we just saw with that trailer.
	Where can people find the full documentary?
	Yeah, it's on my YouTube channel and also my Rumble channel.
	And actually, it's on my Twitter as well.
	Okay. The whole thing.
	Well, tell people where those are.
	Give us the names of your YouTube and your Rumble channel and your Twitter handle.
	Yeah, my Twitter is just SurgeThePurge, just like it sounds.
	Well, S-E-R-G-E, The Purge, number one.
	And then Rumble and YouTube are just SurgeThePurge, all one word.
	Good, good. And that's where they can see the full documentary of what you saw down at the border.
	Kind of flesh it out a little bit for us.
	I mean, you see the government cooperating with what's going on down there.
	And, of course...
	We know they're cutting the wire and things like that.
	If you look at the border that Trump says he built the wall, it's only about 400 miles of a repaired wall and maybe about 40 miles of new wall or something like that.
	The rest of it's wide open.
	What did you see down there at the border that you want to tell people that differs from the official story?
	Yeah, so in terms of the wall itself, from what I'm aware, at least in Arizona, I think our side of the wall is a lot older than what Texas has.
	That's just from what I'm aware.
	So in terms of the wall being there, it is actually there.
	I'm not seeing anything, you know? And basically, he was like, no, that's weird.
	You definitely should look into this.
	And that's when he kind of mentioned a couple of things about the porta-potties and stuff.
	You should look into these companies.
	And basically, through that, we just kind of started connecting the dots.
	With all this stuff and realizing that everything that I had witnessed on video was actually all staging grounds to help illegal aliens across the border and essentially shoot them out onto the highway.
	So there's another YouTube journalist named Andrew Callahan who's a lot bigger than I am.
	Frankly. And he went down there only a couple weeks before I did, but he actually saw the action of all the illegals at the border.
	And when I went down there, I tried to do it as unbiased as possible, meaning I didn't watch too much footage of the news because I didn't want to have a tainted view before I went there.
	So I kind of just try to give everything the benefit of the doubt, but then, you know, I'm seeing military tents, all kinds of, you know, government-funded stuff down there, and the thing that really let me down the rabbit hole really was just, why is there seven porta-potties seven miles in the desert?
	Something is happening here, even though I don't see it right now.
	This is something that's being done kind of undercover, right?
	Yeah, absolutely. And when we looked into the company, I ended up finding who it was.
	It's based out of Tucson. It's called Stand Back Services, and they're under a bigger name called WAC LLC. It turns out they got a federal grant in September, I think the 2nd of September, so three months before the illegal crossing for $383,000 just for the porta-potties, which is...
	Oddly fishy enough, right?
	It's like the dog that didn't bark, right?
	The porta-potty that doesn't have any customers.
	Well, yeah, and that's exactly what Jason basically told me.
	This is incredibly abnormal to have just this many random porta-potties and dumpsters in the middle of the desert.
	And then when...
	Just in case. And I try to give it the benefit of the doubt.
	I'm like, well, maybe Border Patrol needs to use the restroom or whatever.
	But he's like, really? Seven of those?
	Yeah, it doesn't make any sense, right?
	So that's after comparing the footage.
	I'm like, okay, now I'm seeing actually illegals staged in this area.
	And if you drive, you know, so basically how it works, right, is there's this dirt road, and it only connects the actual border crossing from the highway, and then it takes you into the desert about seven miles to the actual wall, and then there's a border road, you know, that Border Patrol actually drives on.
	So to be honest, it's kind of, you know, and this is more of an inference, but there's kind of like no Need for this road, in my opinion.
	And it's very, like I said, very close to the crossing.
	And if you watch the footage, all the illegals actually crossed at the official crossing.
	But then if you watch Andrew Callahan's video, they're staged off to the side, by the wall, out of sight.
	And if you watch his video, they actually wouldn't even let him film it.
	He got a little bit, and then they kicked him out into the parking lot.
	And that's when I realized that they were transporting them into a different, so there's two staging grounds.
	There's one that's right by the wall, and then there's another one actually not that far into the desert that has like the full package.
	I mean, it's military tents, you know, pretty much everything you would need if you're, you know, a homeless migrant, essentially.
	So I made it to that location, and the weird thing about that was the only places that Border Patrol was stationed at the entire time I was out there was the entrance to the dirt road and the actual military encampment area.
	That was it. I didn't see Border Patrol at the wall.
	Nothing like that.
	So when you compare the footage...
	Um, essentially what I believe it is, is they were basically trying to avoid media coverage through this, um, by taking them out there because this dirt road will just shoot them out on the highway and the roads are well paved out there.
	I mean, you don't need four wheel drive.
	Essentially, if you wanted to have a bus out there, it wouldn't be a big deal.
	And just to top it all off, that's when also we realized that Katie Hobbs, the Arizona governor, had filed an executive order in a state of emergency for the border, essentially requesting half a billion dollars from the federal government in aid.
	And then that's when you realize, going down there, not even close to maybe five million dollars of aid down there.
	Wow. And of course, these massive influx of cash like that, it's kind of like the $300 million that Greg Abbott got with a pandemic lockdown.
	It was to help to create more of a pandemic.
	Yeah. And so she's getting a half a billion dollars to create more of a border crisis.
	This is the way that the crazy upside down world that we live in.
	But that's real journalism. You know, what you guys did, investigative reporting, going down there, as you point out, not wanting to be biased by what you'd seen other people to do, other people say, but to actually look at it yourself.
	And come up with your own conclusions, and that's very important that people understand how they're surreptitiously doing this.
	You know, and that was a wonderful start for it, the porta-potty thing, because really, it has hit the fan at the border, all across the border.
	Maybe that's what it's about. The hit the fan scenario.
	They've got to have porta-potties instead of a fence, I guess, because it's such a...
	You know, at the end of the day, these people always kind of end up memeing themselves, you know, in some way or another.
	That's right. That's right.
	Absolutely. Jason, your comments about this whole process and the documentary you guys put together.
	Oh, right. Well, I worked with Serge because I've actually worked on the border.
	I was down there for about 45 days, but different location.
	And they had a real drug smuggling problem and people coming over, smuggling people over.
	And it wasn't a caravan.
	It would be, you know, 10 here, 5 there, a constant flow.
	So when he went out there and he said, there's nothing happening out here, I said, that's kind of the story.
	You know, I got to looking at the tents and stuff on his video.
	I said, well, those are military tents.
	The handwashing station there outside of the porta-potties is in military model.
	Now, that's not to say that Border Patrol wouldn't have access to that equipment.
	Yeah. But I was just thinking to myself, well, let's take a look and see if there was any executive orders, you know, to send the National Guard out there, you know, because maybe that was to support them.
	Mm-hmm. And what we found is timing, timing, timing, location, location, location.
	It's almost like they knew this caravan was coming before it came.
	They got everything put in place.
	They used not just money from, you know, they actually build the federal government.
	They build them and said, hey, you're not taking care of the border, so give us a half a billion dollars.
	And they also took money from the, what is it, American Rescue Plan that Biden signed in.
	So they're getting money from here and there.
	And, you know, knowing how military contracting works...
	They had to have that bid put in place, you know, had people competing on it way before we knew that there was a caravan coming.
	Then they come. There's nothing there at Lukeville, our side of the border, except for the point of entry.
	And then the little buildings that support that.
	So why would you need to hide it in the desert?
	That's right. You know? That's right.
	So I don't know. That's what it is.
	You know, I could say that they were out there trying to keep them from coming over.
	They might have been out there running detainee operations, or they might have been out there assisting.
	And the latter seems to be what was going on.
	So would you guys say that the collapse of the border is kind of like the collapse of these buildings on 9-11?
	You know, there's actually more knowledge and planning of this stuff.
	It just doesn't happen like that, right?
	It's actually interesting you mention that because, I mean, the way I wanted to lay out the doc, because obviously I don't have a newsroom, right?
	Like, it's just me and Jason doing this thing.
	And I really wanted to lay it out in kind of a questionnaire format, kind of like Dr.
	Judy Wood, like, with the 9-11 stuff.
	Like, just making a good enough inference that you can think for yourself.
	If someone else wants to take the information even further, you know, feel free to do so, essentially.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah, it truly is interesting how all this stuff is working.
	And, you know, as I look at this, some of the recent news that's come out about the border and the UK, because other people are coming in from other parts of the world into their country, swamping their country.
	They're saying, well, we're going to have to set aside our planning laws, which is what we call zoning here.
	And you look at that and you realize how that plays into the globalist agenda.
	Andrew Yang, the guy who was pushing universal basic income at the beginning and then Elon Musk said, yeah, that's great.
	That's exactly what we need. Gave him millions of dollars.
	Then Andrew Yang, after he gets that funding from Elon Musk, he starts pushing other aspects of the globalist agenda, which is to say...
	We're going to get rid of zoning, and we're going to wipe out all zoning from the federal government level.
	And so you see these types of things happening everywhere.
	They create a crisis, and now we've got to have this reaction to all of this.
	You even have the Republicans jumping in on this and saying, well, look, with all these people coming in, we're going to have to have some kind of a national ID like E-Verify.
	Because they're going to take all of our jobs.
	It's crisis solution, and they've got these things planned in advance, just like the porta-potties that they've got out there at the border.
	They create this, and then lo and behold, the solution is what they've been talking about doing all along, isn't it?
	Yeah, absolutely. And I think what you just said kind of hit it on the head that the whole thing, in my opinion, is definitely not reactionary at all and incredibly premeditated with all of it.
	And I think for the Republicans, too.
	I mean, I think a lot of it's just become a wedge issue for them.
	I don't know if they actually believe it.
	I mean, you have to support it if they do the right thing in the situation, but I think it'll probably go away after the election cycle.
	Oh, I agree. I think there's a lot of posturing, especially in the Eagle Pass thing.
	But there's also, as they're talking about Eagle Pass, the articles coming out said, look, this is a town under martial law.
	And it's not just, you know, it's a small little area.
	When you look at the massive 2,000 miles of border, and again, you were in Arizona.
	But you look at this massive open border and they've got everything there for a show.
	And what they're doing is they're harassing residents there in Eagle Pass living under martial law.
	And, you know, shutting them down. It's not just that they're interdicting the people who are going to come through at that one small area, but they're harassing the people there who are citizens who have been living there for a very long time.
	That's why I say, you know, when you start talking about a wall and you start talking about getting IDs for people like E-Verify and these other types of things, you need to understand that this is the solution that they wanted all along.
	They're creating panic, chaos, fear, so they can then get control.
	And it makes me think about the old Don Adams show, you know, Get Smart.
	We've got to get smart. Okay.
	Because they're using chaos to impose control.
	Those are the two opposing sides in that spy sitcom thing that he had.
	But yeah, it truly is amazing.
	When you look at this, you better be careful when people ask for interdiction to make sure it doesn't bounce back on them.
	You know, if you get a wall and you get IDs for everybody, they may use that wall and those IDs against you.
	They may put you under martial law.
	And the whole thing is being enticed.
	You know, it's not just what you see there with the porta-potties.
	They've got this massive enticement public policy.
	Come on in. We will give you unemployment.
	We'll give you free health care.
	We'll give you this. We'll give you that.
	You've just got to get across the border somehow.
	And so this is a massive, massive welfare magnet.
	Pull this stuff in.
	And these interdiction things, even though there needs to be some interdiction there...
	This can easily be used against us as well.
	The real issue is the welfare magnet bringing people in, I think.
	What do you guys think? Yeah, well, that's kind of what we were talking about.
	I think I actually mentioned this on Gardner's show as well, that I think eventually, with this illegal alien stuff, I think they'll end up actually going back on it at some point and essentially using that as a segue for CBDC at some point, saying, hey, you want to avoid people taking your jobs or whatever it might be.
	This is secure. Go with this, essentially.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah, well, you verify they've already done that.
	Now, if you bring in a massive, impoverished population, that has always been, as we've seen, whether it's in India or other places, take the number of the beast, we'll give you welfare, we'll give you health care.
	So all these things that they're using as a magnet to come in, and they get millions of people to come in, that'll be the seed of CBDC. Because these people, they bring in, well, we're going to have to, you know, have some control over this and be fiscally responsible about this and make sure we know who's getting the money.
	So everybody's going to have to have an ID and they're going to have to have a CBDC and that's the way we're going to pass out these benefits.
	I think that's going to be the tip of the spear on the CBDC stuff as well.
	Absolutely. I also think that having this massive immigration from all these different countries, and it's not like there's a Facebook group that says, hey, let's go to America.
	Let's all meet up in South America here and walk in a caravan.
	That's not what's happening, right?
	That's right. People from different countries just happen to be lumped together. And especially when you have, you know, a safer place to go, this may be 1000 miles from where you're at, you're going to travel several thousand, you know, 10,000 miles or something like that, to come into America.
	But I see it as all these people here from different countries, if we have anything happen, whether it's a false flag, it could be a natural disaster.
	There's so much possibility to blame it on anybody we want to go to war with.
	And we've already stated that if there's an attack on our infrastructure, we're going to consider that a physical attack.
	So if we have a cascading power outage and it takes the grid down, are they going to blame it on one of these people?
	Right. And if you have the grid go down and that takes us into chaos, guess what's going to happen with people who are homeless, who have no property, nowhere to go?
	That's going to be also the seed of massive chaos and bloodshed and all the rest of the stuff.
	As you're pointing out, it's not like these people got a Facebook group.
	Hey, let's go do this. But it is being coordinated.
	It's being coordinated by these NGOs.
	And Michael Yan has documented that as well down at the Darien Gap and other places where they say, well, if you're coming from this country, we're bringing people.
	We're going to interject them into this other country because they're going to be amenable to people coming in at that point, whereas at another point they wouldn't be.
	The whole thing is a global conspiracy.
	No doubt about it.
	Yeah, you're talking about the welfare magnet.
	I was looking into Mayor Eric Adams of New York, and he's right now trying to blame the federal government on all these immigrants he has in his city committing all these crimes.
	But yet, if you look at his policies...
	He's no bail releases.
	It's a revolving door for the criminals to do whatever they do.
	There's massive, you know, thievery schemes going on, little gangs and stuff.
	And then now he's trying to give them a thousand dollars a month.
	And he's telling the residents, the local residents, you need to put these people up in your house.
	So you have three lodging, $1,000 a month, and you can just run throughout the city committing crime.
	We're not going to do anything to you.
	So that's why there's so many in New York.
	That's why there's so many in California.
	Because it's not just the welfare magnet.
	It's the lack of prosecution.
	You can do whatever you want.
	Yeah, that's the Soros chaos.
	Alvin Bragg, even though they beat up police officers, usually they don't tolerate the beating of police officers.
	But he lets these guys go.
	And then he gets so much public kickback from that that he says, oh, we'll do something about it.
	But, you know, that's their instinct.
	That's what these Soros district attorneys are there for.
	And when you look at what's happening in New York, Chicago, L.A., various places like that, as they panic about All these people who have come in, all these migrants who have come in.
	Denver is another one. They're just fine as long as they get money, right?
	It's all about the money. I just need you to send me some Washington money, same way as it was with the pandemic.
	Well, we've got this pandemic here, so send us some money.
	You send them some money, they don't care.
	They're going to be fine. They'll do whatever you tell them to do.
	And they'll use this as another MacGuffin to destroy their area that they're in charge of.
	As long as you send them money at their discretion.
	That's really what they're after.
	Talking about putting people in their homes.
	I just saw a story about that in Massachusetts.
	Had a family signed up to house some immigrants because they didn't have any housing for the illegal immigrants who were coming in.
	And they said, within an hour, we had four people in our house.
	Wow, talk about wearing your heart on your sleeve.
	Wow. Yeah, I know.
	It's like the Third Amendment violation.
	You know, we're going to house this invading army, and right now they're asking, how much longer are they going to be asking?
	Well, you know, that's kind of interesting, too, because, you know, when all this stuff happened in Afghanistan with, you know, Biden, you know, a couple years ago now, I mentioned that to a few people that, you know, this is going to turn into you probably housing people from these countries at some point.
	And it honestly looks like that's exactly what's happening now, except they're, you know, coming up through the southern border.
	That's right. Except they're selling it as, you know, this is going to be a big boost to the economy.
	This is what you've got Democrat economists telling us that they're going to be a 7 trillion, with a T, $7 trillion boost.
	Hey, that's what Sam Altman's looking for.
	What he needs to get his artificial intelligence is he just needs an army of illegal aliens, and he's done.
	He doesn't need to go get money from governments and from Silicon Valley.
	He just, you know, monetize these illegal aliens to come in and get $7 trillion.
	It's funny, you know, now everything is like $6 or $7 trillion because that's what they've been throwing at whatever their crisis du jour is, is $6 or $7 trillion.
	So that's now the new...
	The new negotiating point, right?
	I guess. Isn't this crazy?
	I mean, it's just, you look at this and yet nothing is being done.
	And I think that's the craziest thing of all.
	With all this frustration, how do you get people channeled for this?
	Because the Democrats are doing it deliberately.
	The Republicans say, well, this is their wedge issue.
	We're going to elect us and we'll do something about it.
	And yet they don't. They don't do anything about it.
	Yeah, I think, you know, Jason said it best at the end of the documentary.
	You said it was not to denigrate society.
	Destabilize. Yeah, Soros destabilizes nations.
	And, you know, when it comes to the money, they don't care.
	They're gonna keep printing it because let's just say that you know You're you're not you know you're gonna be bankrupt in three months We'll just go ahead and charge up all the credit cards might as well max some jokers out And then we'll write it off, and that's what they're gonna do yeah is they're gonna bring in the CBDC at some point And you know for the migrants in New York I don't know why they don't take these all these office buildings and just house them there that are empty And that's a big zoning issue for New York
	I guess New York has a ton of empty buildings right now, and it's become basically too expensive to revamp them, but it's also too expensive to knock them down, so they're going to stay empty.
	Well, and again, that's how we've got to get rid of these zoning laws, right?
	We've got to get rid of the zoning laws, and then we destroy people's equity in their homes.
	We make them homeless.
	We create public housing everywhere.
	And then we create this massive megacities.
	Again, zoning is something that they're trying to push at a national level instead of a local level.
	And it's always about...
	keeping control at the local level or losing it to some centralized place and that is another key area where there's going to be a fight.
	They're trying to get the land through the Natural asset companies, or they're trying to take it over at the state level through weaponizing these conservation easements that the farmers have sold to them.
	But it's also the zoning.
	And so when you look at these types of things, the NACs, the zoning, the conservation easements that now become about climate, these are mechanisms by which they can take control of land.
	And you look at it, if anybody in America has got any equity and any wealth, it's typically in their house.
	Most people are not in the stock market or anything like that.
	So it's important for them to take away that aspect of it.
	And I think they're going to do that.
	And, you know, there's going to be, oh, we've got a crisis.
	We've got all these empty office buildings in New York.
	Let's change the zoning laws.
	And then it goes on from there.
	Look what a success that was.
	As if anything in New York would be a success.
	But they do roll these things out from there, just like, you know, camera monitors and speed monitors and mission zone monitors and things like that.
	But let's talk about the censorship, because both of you guys have hit a lot of censorship with this stuff.
	Tell us about that. Yeah, you know, I think Jason's got hit a little bit harder than me, but I have noticed that, well, it was kind of weird.
	Like, all of a sudden, like, actually, as of the day that I released the documentary and put it on Twitter, Twitter started...
	I'm subtracting followers from my page, and I'm like, if this was a high rate, like if I had like 100,000 followers, because I have about 200, and they subtracted almost 30 from my page.
	I mean, think about the ratio there.
	And I'm thinking, well, I don't think it's something I said.
	That people just decided to unfollow me.
	And also the same with YouTube.
	When I put out the World Economic Forum documentary, they started subtracting views off my videos and actually started doing it with all my videos, not even just that one.
	And eventually I just kind of made the executive decision to just pull it off YouTube for now and keep it on Rumble.
	That was a World Economic Forum video?
	Yes, yeah. Yeah, it's kind of interesting.
	I had the experience with World Economic Forum just like a year ago or so.
	And I saw something, somebody quoted them in an article.
	I said, you know, I don't follow the World Economic Forum.
	I should put them on my feed.
	And so I clicked to go there to add them to my feed, and they had blocked me.
	You guys block me?
	I never interacted with them on social media, but I guess they're aware of my reports or whatever.
	And so they'd block me.
	And when you talk about the...
	The fact that they are taking away followers on Twitter, I don't think really anything has changed on Twitter.
	Not for me. And I said that.
	I said that and I got a Drudge link, so I'm sure things aren't going to change on Twitter for me.
	Because I said, I've seen some high-profile people restored and reinstated, but I said, for me, it hasn't changed at all.
	And Drudge put that up.
	I linked to that tweet and left it there for two or three days and I said, well, I guess I'm done on Twitter now, but I really do believe that.
	And the same type of thing you're talking about, years ago I would look at this stuff when the censorship stuff started first happening before we even got purged back in 2018.
	I would notice that Okay, so I get capped at where I am, about $130,000.
	I'm still there after years and years, you know.
	And I would notice that it would go up during the week and then it would go up over the weekend and then it would come down during the week.
	So it's like whoever was manually doing this takes the weekend off and it would go up and then they would subtract people.
	Karen got subtracted from following me.
	And at the same time that they pushed her to follow AOC. Now, that's not an algorithm.
	That is a person who is doing something like that because there's no way they could have an algorithm that would be that stupid because the main thing she was doing was, you know, watching my stuff.
	She would always put my stuff there.
	And if they looked at what she was doing, they would know she doesn't like AOC. So that was something that was being done directly.
	But, you know, that still goes on with my stuff.
	You know, it goes up and then they take it down, that type of thing.
	And I've gotten over the point of looking at it saying, was it something that I said?
	I know it's something that I said, but it's...
	Oh, it's more than that now, David.
	I'll tell you a quick little story.
	I got up and running on Facebook, and at first, you know, I did some test streaming.
	I said, okay, I got a Facebook page for Knights of the Storm.
	I was able to stream a couple test videos, and then I uploaded one video.
	But it takes a massive amount of time.
	It takes longer than it takes to make the video to upload it for some reason.
	Facebook, great stuff, right?
	Yeah, I said, well, it'll just be easier if I live stream or replay it.
	It'll be easier for me to get it up on.
	So, you know, I do my streaming software and I just play the video full screen and let it stream up there.
	Well, then it told me that I couldn't...
	My account was too young to live stream yet.
	But I just did two test live streams.
	Okay, so I said, all right, whatever.
	Let's get a couple followers.
	Let's stick around for a couple weeks.
	So then, you know, a couple weeks later, I was able to live stream and then it took my video down.
	Wow. Right? Said I violated community guidelines.
	Well, okay, we're out of Facebook jail now.
	So last weekend I went to stream there and Angus and I were sitting there.
	He was hosting Knights of the Storm with me.
	And I had a misfire.
	I forgot to fire the video.
	So it's just me and him looking kind of stupid on air for about 10 seconds.
	Yeah. Didn't say a word and it pulled us down and said we violated community guidelines again.
	And they get away with it because we're small.
	And they've got to be using like a facial recognition AI because we didn't say a word.
	There was nothing to transcribe to say that we said something we weren't supposed to say.
	So it just pulled us down.
	Doesn't tell us anything.
	You can petition it.
	You're going to get some kind of frequently asked question AI generated response.
	Yeah. And I think what they're doing now, because if you look at people like Steven Crowder, he always had a hard time with YouTube, but they let him get too big.
	And once you get too big, that's a legal battle, because now you're talking about people's revenue and they'll get lawyers and stuff.
	And they're making millions of dollars so they can pay for big legal fees.
	So I think they're going after the little fish when bullying us.
	And if you take a look at...
	Especially because if you look at what Crowder talks about, you look at what Alex talks about and everything, it's controlled opposition.
	It's all safe subjects.
	Exactly. It's not anything that challenges them.
	Oh, let's talk about pronouns or this or that, right?
	You know, it's that type of stuff.
	And that type of stuff, actually, they like because they want us divided and fighting against each other.
	It isn't anything that pulls people together.
	It isn't anything that exposes their agenda.
	It's something that highlights the conflict within our culture or religious values or something.
	They love that kind of stuff.
	They'll promote that forever.
	Yeah, but going back to being really big and then they can't stop you.
	Do you know who Dr. John Campbell is?
	I do, yeah.
	So he talks a lot about the vaccines, vaccine injuries.
	I watched a video that Andy sent me today.
	They're talking about the clots he had a coroner on.
	These big old long clots they're pulling out.
	But they won't take him off of YouTube because he has 3 million subscribers.
	Yeah. So, you know, if they did that to him, they're potentially going to lose three million customers.
	He's too big to jail, you're saying?
	Right, exactly. That's right.
	So, yeah, they're finding creative ways.
	I believe they're using the AI. I think they're starting to get into facial recognition.
	So if they see you on someone's thing, it happened to Angry Tiger as well.
	Yeah. He got booted in 14 minutes, and we were talking about a religious topic.
	Yeah. And then once he got out of a YouTube jail, he's broadcasting again.
	They took him down in like 10 seconds.
	Wow. And it was still playing the intro video, and it took him down.
	But now the crazy thing is the religious one that they took him down and, you know, put him on strike for, the video is still there.
	So there's obviously nothing that was said that violated anything.
	Otherwise, they would have taken the video down.
	They just don't like him being, because he talks about the Fed, you know?
	Yeah. Well, that's where I got my first censorship, where Infowars got their first censorship.
	It was 2013. On the, what was it, December the 23rd, the 100th anniversary of the creation of the Federal Reserve, I did the It's a Wonderful Lie.
	That's the first time they'd ever had anything censored, and that was about the Federal Reserve.
	And, you know, talk about taking things down.
	I set up a channel.
	I said, all right, I'm not going to do politics.
	I'll just do music. So I set up a channel and I did the Christmas songs two years ago.
	And they took that down.
	It's Christmas songs that I did.
	So there's no copyright claims on it and no explanation.
	They just took it down and banned it.
	I can't even get onto YouTube to like something from somebody.
	I can't even log in with that.
	I'm not even going to bother to try to create another identity.
	I'm just done with them. Well, yeah, that's what I was going to say.
	People keep talking about the social credit score.
	It's coming, but it's obviously already here.
	It is. If you're getting banned like that and everyone's getting banned, they obviously recognize what Jason's saying probably is facial recognition or whatever it is at this point.
	Well, you know, you're talking about how, again, if it's facial recognition, voice recognition, all these other things to shut you down right away, it's going to get worse than that.
	Because I've talked about for the longest time this Content Coalition for Providence and Authentication.
	It has a great acronym, CCPA. It's like the Chinese Communist Party of America.
	But it was put together with Microsoft.
	They're doing this with DARPA money and some other things like that.
	Microsoft is kind of running this coalition.
	But they've got hardware companies like Intel processors and the ARM processors.
	On the hardware side, they've got the software companies like Adobe and on and on.
	And then they're allied with the big media companies who will tell them, ban this person because they're going against our official story.
	And so they'll be able to identify you.
	This goes beyond having your MAP or something like that, or your IP address or anything like that, you know, that you could get around with a firewall or something.
	This would go to the machine level and keep you from even uploading anything after you're a banned person.
	So this type of thing, the CCP, the Chinese Communist Party of America...
	Brought to you by Microsoft and Adobe and Intel and all these other big tech companies.
	That's where this is all headed.
	And of course, with artificial intelligence, they're going to be able to scan everybody.
	See, the thing is, having Crowder up there, for example, or having Joe Rogan up there, These guys make tens of millions of dollars, and it gives a veneer of a free press.
	And that's one of the reasons why it's so important to them.
	It's not just that they've got a lot of followers, but it gives people the illusion of having a free press while they censor everybody else, the general public, to take away freedom of speech for everybody else.
	Freedom of press is one thing, free speech is another thing.
	They want to take away free speech because it's the mass of people That they're concerned about.
	They can easily control these gatekeepers, these mainstream alternative media people.
	They can easily control them.
	And it gives an illusion of a free speech and a free press.
	One thing I want to say about that, actually, and this is what I've noticed definitely since 2016, is that a lot of these what used to be alt-media journalists or independent journalists, essentially they've all become rock stars, like Tucker Carlson, James O'Keefe from Project Veritas.
	They've all elevated to this rock star level.
	Where now it's just become, I think, professional wrestling for everything.
	People will just follow these people not because of their news anymore.
	It's just because they like their personality.
	It is. And they're making so much money.
	I feel like that's why now you have an alternative to the alternative media is because you can't get real news now from alt media.
	That's right. Yeah, David Icke just talked about that, and I think somebody sent me an email, said he just had a debate with Alex Jones over that.
	He said, you know, you guys have been picked for this stuff.
	You know, Tucker Carlson is in with Musk, and he gets you back in, and it's a controlled situation.
	And it really is. It really is a controlled situation.
	No, absolutely. Definitely.
	Going back to the censorship, there's another thing I want people to think about.
	Everything has moved, even in the military, it moved that direction.
	It's gone to cloud-based and subscription-based service.
	Yes, that's right. So, let's just say Serge is using some kind of an online base for his video editing.
	He doesn't even have to release that or try to release that.
	They can see what he's working on.
	Yes. That's right.
	And if you cut your internet, you're unable to do anything because everything is cloud-based now.
	That's why I keep old versions of software.
	I have an old computer here on the floor.
	If I need to create something that isn't tagged somewhere or monitored, I can create it and then try to get it out in another way.
	And then also with the censorship, I wanted to mention this.
	Angry Tiger, I watch his show all the time.
	I always support him. And I've literally gone in there And it'll say there's three people, four people viewing, but there's like 10 people in the chat.
	Yeah, I know.
	So how is that? They are playing with the metrics, number one, to discourage us, and number two, to make us look like maybe we're not that appealing.
	So, oh, this guy's only got four followers or 100 followers or whatever.
	That's right. Or this only has 30 views.
	So this is what I would say to do.
	I ask you all to help us out.
	Leave a comment. Share it or leave a comment because if you leave comments, you know, how can only 10 people have watched this video if I have 100 people that made comments?
	That's very important. Yeah, that's very important.
	Push back against it. Show that the reporting is false.
	Before they kicked us off in 2018, everywhere, I had seen that the first year.
	That purge was almost the one-year anniversary of my independent show.
	And so I had seen, when the show first started on YouTube, they weren't controlling anything.
	And so I was frequently getting up 250,000 more views.
	A bad video would get 60,000 or 70,000 views on YouTube.
	And then all of a sudden, They radically start to go down.
	That's where you say, was it something that I said?
	I mean, at that point in time, I wasn't really coming after Trump because that was 2018.
	It's stuff where he really started doubling down on vaccines and gun control and all that kind of stuff started in 2019.
	And so I was like, what is going on with that?
	And yet the number of people who were following my channel kept growing at a really fast pace.
	And so I got up within like the first six months, like 60,000 people.
	And then they're telling me that people continue subscribing to the channel, but they're not watching the videos.
	And then the number of people subscribing to the channel got capped.
	And then within a couple of months, they just kicked us off completely with no explanation.
	So that's the type of pattern that you see.
	Now you're seeing that with startup media organizations and things like that, and it's spreading out everywhere.
	But that is the same type of pattern that I saw when I was there at that platform.
	Yeah. Yeah, AI is allowing them to get to us early before nobody knows who we are.
	And like I was telling you last time, Substack has a program that will do your transcript.
	And for like an hour and a half long show, it takes about five minutes to transcribe that whole show accurately.
	So we know they can do this in real time.
	That's right. And with the incident that happened with Facebook, it leads me to believe they might be trying to use facial recognition.
	And the AI really is garbage.
	I was watching, if you go to Gates Notes, he has a podcast he puts up over there.
	I keep an eye on what Gates is doing because he's into so much stuff.
	But he had, who's the guy that chat, the open AI, Sam Altman?
	Yeah. He had Sam Altman on.
	And they both admitted that AI was garbage.
	Absolute garbage. But they're trying to get to the next level of AI. And what's going to make it learn is the more we use it, the better it gets.
	So I'm done playing with any of these.
	I know they're kind of funny. I got Google's OpenAI.
	I got them to...
	Well, there you go.
	Yeah. But I'm going to stop playing with it.
	It's kind of entertaining because the more I play with it, the more it learns.
	So maybe this is just one of those things we don't want to play with anymore.
	Well, it's scraping stuff off everywhere.
	And that's really our hope, in a sense.
	I don't know if you heard me talking about this, but I've talked about it a couple of times.
	They've already discovered that if AI starts feeding on AI Material then it's kind of like cannibalism and and it comes up and starts becoming absolutely useless It's got to feed on humans if it feeds on other AI Then it's like it gets you know Yakov Kreutzfeldt disease or mad cow disease or something like that. It starts to lose its mental ability its ability to do anything And so that's really our hope because it's going to start putting out tons and tons of content and it's going to
	start feeding off of its own content That's almost like in fours reporting on their own articles It's like an instant reporting.
	That's what we were talking about yesterday.
	It's like, yeah, you'll pull an article and it's like, yeah, InfoWars, read the headline and that's it.
	Go off on your own tangent.
	But it's kind of interesting you say that.
	That is an interesting thought about AI. Because when I first started doing this, I kind of assumed...
	That I would get you know banned or whatever at some point and I and I thought maybe there'd be some safer subject matter for at least just YouTube where I could grow the audience there and then have like kind of the more Esoteric subject matter on Twitter and rumble And I was like yeah, I don't know I mean I hear about the shadow banning thing and then when it finally started happening to me like that I was like, okay, I guess this is a real thing, you know?
	Yeah. Oh, yeah Well, you know, and that's the thing.
	Maybe it gets to the point where they just want to make sure that nobody gets any audience, regardless of what you're talking about.
	You know, that's also a possibility.
	They don't want anybody else to come up through the ranks because they might be a danger to them.
	But they've always been very focused on certain issues, and I... Part of my problem with them was I was never going to play this game during the COVID stuff.
	All these people were afraid to say the vaccine.
	And so they would not use the word.
	They said, you know, the thing, the thing that's out there.
	They got caught anyway, right?
	They could figure that stuff out.
	Even if they were warning people about, you know, the thing that's out there, the thing that I will not mention, they figured that out as well.
	So, you know, I'm not going to hide from these people.
	I'm not going to play their games.
	And I think we need to all just...
	We need to look at things like Rumble.
	We need to look at things like Substack.
	I need to do more with Substack.
	And that's what our plans are to do, is to try to get on Substack.
	Because these platforms that are set up for free speech, and at the moment they are.
	I mean, maybe something will happen to them.
	Maybe somebody will buy them out or shut them down or whatever.
	But at the moment, there are some platforms out there for free speech.
	I was going to say back during the vaccine stuff, before I was doing my own media stuff, I used to listen to actually Gavin McInnes a lot because he's a funny guy.
	He has censored.tv, but I realized when the vaccines were coming out, he wasn't saying anything about it at all.
	I was like, well, you have your own platform.
	You should definitely be able to talk about this.
	I actually wrote him an email.
	And then I just got a response back.
	I basically just said, hey, I don't feel comfortable basically supporting your channel anymore.
	You're not willing to speak out against the vaccine.
	In fact, your co-host has even acted stupid, frankly, and said, oh, yeah, if you get the vaccine, you can't get COVID or whatever.
	And I wrote him an email, and my response that I got back was pretty much like, hey, sorry you feel that way.
	Basically, we don't want your money.
	Yeah. Well, you know, these guys that get this big, it's all about market share.
	It is. And, you know, my opinion, Tucker, you don't fire your home run hitter.
	And Tucker was the only person making Fox money over there, and they fired him.
	So they say they fired him.
	Because he talked a little bit about 9-11 and a little bit about the vaccine.
	just enough to get people's interest that are on the right and then they inject him into Twitter right and he has his own network overnight his own studio does his own makeup I guess all that good stuff and if if they can have someone like Tucker someone like Gavin someone like you know Alex Jones that are on board with certain things they don't want to talk about they'll talk about other stuff to entertain you they take up all the market share so it's hard to pick up viewers when people are watching you know three or four or five
	people a day. You know they don't have the time to pick up a...
	And you look at the establishment mainstream media, things like W&D, Breitbart, things like that.
	I mean, they hang on every word that Tucker says.
	And they've turned it into essentially a cult like it is with Trump.
	You know, oh, this guy's for real.
	He sees limited hangout.
	You know, he is always still a limited hangout, even when he talks about Building 7.
	Well, you know, you can't talk about Building 7 or they'll fire you.
	And it wasn't that long ago that he was mocking people, that he had an engineer who came on.
	The engineer said, well, let me show people what I'm talking about.
	No, I'm not going to play your video.
	They just brought them on to shut them down.
	He's always been controlled opposition, and he's always been there to control the narrative.
	And so you have to ask yourself, you know, what is he doing?
	Is he really shedding any light on anything?
	Or is he there to create confidence in him?
	And that's a sign of a con man.
	And that's why I'm very critical of Tucker as well.
	Especially when you look at his close alliance with Elon Musk.
	I have never trusted Elon Musk.
	I was always at loggerheads with Alex over that as well.
	So this guy, he's a technocrat.
	He's become the world's richest man by doing exactly what the government wants, which is to push the climate agenda.
	That's going to be the thing that's going to be used as an excuse to take away all of our freedoms and destroy the Constitution, destroy our lives.
	And he's made so much money off of that as the world's richest man.
	What's he doing now? He's selling the necessity of carbon taxes.
	As he puts rockets, thousands of them, into space.
	Exactly, exactly. Yeah, exactly.
	The hypocrisy is just insane.
	But what makes it work is the fact that you get people who will...
	Kowtow to him because he gives them access, because he builds them up.
	I mean, I had a friend from Austin say, what's going on with Alex?
	You know, with this reprogramming and everything from Tucker and with Musk, he's now become the sage wise man of the alternative media now all of a sudden overnight.
	And that's what they did. You know, they invested that.
	But he knew about all this stuff.
	Yeah, he knew about the vaccine stuff more than anybody else did, and he was as much as anybody did, and he was selling it as sugar water.
	I mean, this is what a con game looks like.
	Get confidence in people so they can then stab you in the back.
	I got an exercise for people to try.
	Go watch one of these three-hour shows, record it, then cut out, get some video editing software and cut out everything that's commercial to sell your product or when they refer to their product live on air.
	Cut all that out and see how much actual content there is.
	Oh, I know. Because I know what the clock is.
	This is a lot tougher gig because I've got to do three hours of constant stuff.
	I don't have any time that I can read and prepare.
	When I was there, it was two hours of content when you take out of a three-hour show.
	One-third of it was commercials, infomercials.
	And I would go in and we'd have like nine minutes on.
	Then there'd be an infomercial or local commercials for another five minutes.
	So I would come in in the morning and I could come in and start the prep much, much later.
	And I'd get ahead by about a half hour or so.
	And I could continue to stay ahead by looking over those five minutes that I was off.
	I would look at what I had in my stack of articles.
	I didn't listen to the infomercials.
	It'd drive me nuts. So they just brought in the audio when the bumper started playing.
	That's why I didn't know that Alex was doing this thing telling everybody that Trump was saving him from the bad Gates vaccine.
	I didn't know anything about that because I didn't listen to the stuff in the middle.
	It was just my content that was there.
	I don't know if you recall a stint of Alex basically selling Viagra on his show after you left.
	I think he pulled that one back, though, because he can't find anything about it anymore.
	Was he literally selling Viagra?
	Because he used to do that with Superman Vitality.
	No, no. This was actually a pill, and he had porn stars actually do the infomarship for him, saying, hey, this works great.
	And I think he pulled it back pretty quick, because I think a lot of people were like, hey, you know...
	Well, he pulled back the religious votive candles as well.
	Because I just, I looked it up again because Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey had a candle like that.
	And so there were some articles, people saying, that's We're blasphemous to our Catholic religion.
	Some of these votive candles and all this kind of stuff.
	And I thought, yeah, but Alex did that back in November of 2021.
	I did a report on it at the time.
	I said, the perfect Christmas gift is coming up.
	You can get an Alex Jones votive candle and you can buy some Donald Trump wrapping paper for it.
	Got everything covered. I mean, who could want more, right?
	I mean, he's gone to sacrilegious candles, to pornographic stuff, to...
	He hooked up with a New Age guru to sell...
	Oh yeah, he was in a recent wars.
	What's that? Reset Wars, too, is kind of like that metaphysic kind of stuff, you know?
	Yeah, yeah. He hooked up for a while with this internet guru who was selling The Secret, which is like, you know, the PowerPoint.
	It's this Oprah Winfrey type of New Age garbage that was out there.
	I mean, he'll try anything for a buck.
	It's at the point now where he has absolutely no principles, and it's been that way for a couple of years.
	Actually, the year 2020, it was pretty obvious that that was where he was.
	So, yeah, it's sad.
	But, you know, that's the key thing.
	You know, we need to look at where we can go, places, and I have been dragging my feet on it, but I need to get on to Substack, and we need to have a better presence there.
	You guys probably need to be there as well.
	I've got a sub stack that I post all the videos as an audio podcast.
	So I have one for the foxhole and one for nights of the storm.
	So I always put them up there.
	Usually the day of or the day after we go live, it'll be up there.
	So I know a lot of people, especially if you're traveling, the audio format's better because it doesn't consume the battery in your devices as quickly.
	And it requires less bandwidth.
	So if you have a bad connection, it's less likely to buffer.
	So I always do the audio there.
	Yeah, that's good. That's good.
	Yeah, that's good that you're there.
	And I know you guys put up articles as well.
	I haven't been putting up any articleizations of the show, but that's something that we need to do, just trying to figure out how we're going to do it.
	Because it's the type of thing where, you know, there's not the money to hire somebody to do that.
	So it's... It's a difficult thing to figure out how to bootstrap this stuff up.
	And I know you guys are in the same type of situation.
	Tell us what you're doing in terms of how you're sustaining yourselves.
	Is this a hobby for you?
	Are you taking donations?
	What are you doing? Yeah, I mean, pretty much for me right now, I take donations.
	I mean, ironically enough, David, I'm a music teacher as my day job.
	I teach guitar and classical piano.
	I was going to actually play the clip.
	I thought Jason's comments were great on it.
	You're playing electric guitar.
	It was really good. And I love Jason's comment where he said, from Back to the Future, your grandkids are going to love this stuff or whatever.
	Unfortunately, that's the way music has gone now.
	It really is sad to see a lot of young kids coming in and not even knowing music with instruments in it anymore.
	But yeah, that's my day job.
	Of course, I'm trying to do this full-time at some point, but just building it up.
	I take donations.
	I've got links on all my pages on how you can help support if you feel like the information helped you.
	Good. And I'm glad that you're teaching kids music because we're becoming very, very, very illiterate, as you can see from the charts.
	People don't know what music is and it's getting dumber and dumber.
	That's just one area of idiocracy, but it really is a glaring point there in terms of music education that's missing.
	How can people support Knights of the Storm and the Foxhole Report, of course, Angry Tigers, Tiger and Snake Report.
	How are you guys set up there for people to support you guys?
	Well, we're through Rumble, so if you feel like donating to Rumble, then you can tip us there.
	I do have a PayPal set up, which I haven't used yet, and I think I did add a donate button on our page.
	But what we really are trying to do, we wanted to get on the same thing with the Spreaker and Spotify.
	I'm trying to get it out there so I can monetize it.
	Yes. The problem is this censorship stuff.
	They want to keep you small. The Knights of the Storm has actually got a little bit of traction through Spotify.
	Spotify pushes it out to all these other places.
	I think you've got to hit 1,000 views a month within a 30-day period, and then you can...
	Then you can monetize it.
	Spotify has been where I've been the most heavily censored.
	I mean, I think I'm still on there right now, but typically what will happen is when things change, and I got all of my stuff wiped out in the first week of December after I talked about the vaccine as being mass murder.
	They shut me down, even though I've been there for years on Spreaker, but Spotify would refuse to accept my podcast, and they were the only ones.
	And so when I started to back up, I said, well, let's try that there.
	And last time I looked, I was still on Spotify.
	But typically, after a couple months, they kick me off.
	They're the only ones who've kicked me off of any podcast has been Spotify.
	So, you know, that just as a word of warning.
	I have a backup plan.
	Good. We have a couple of backup plans.
	But right now, that was just the easiest one.
	And it has a site on more places.
	And it looks across all those places and it tallies those views.
	So that's the quickest way for us to get to 1,000.
	Because I don't want people to have to donate.
	I want, you know, if you listen to it and they throw some ads in there, preferably not for Pfizer products.
	But, you know...
	You know, it can sustain itself.
	And, you know, we don't need a lot of money, just enough money to upgrade equipment and things like that.
	That's good. Well, that's the key thing.
	And, you know, the truth is a powerful thing.
	We don't need to defend it.
	We just need to unleash it. And even if we unleash it in a quiet spot, God can make it go around the world.
	As Travis pointed out, he said, God doesn't deal in secrets.
	He is mighty. He declares his plan in the open because no one can oppose him.
	All this New Age nonsense...
	It's about hidden meanings, and all the stuff that the technocrats are doing is to try to hide things, but you can't hide that light, not even under a bushel.
	Thank you for joining us folks. Have a good day.
	The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲