Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 18, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:55

The David Knight Show - 01/18/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday the 18th of January, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Today we're going to begin with some Trump sycophants.
	And you spell that S-I-C-K-O, sickos, dash font.
	Yeah, we're going to begin by taking a look at Mark Levin.
	And then we're going to take a look at a very interesting back and forth Between Luke Radowski, Tim Pool, and Laura Loomer, Tim Pool loses it.
	He can't handle it if you simply say, can Trump say that he was wrong?
	Can he say that his, what did he call them?
	Oh yeah, back in May 2021, he called them Trumpzines.
	Trumpzines. I call the Trump shots and people get really angry with me.
	I say, give him the credit that he craves.
	Can we just say that it was wrong?
	Oh no, you can't.
	He explodes in profanity.
	And Laura Looney is right there with him.
	We'll be right back. Let's begin with Mark Levin.
	Mark Levin! And I want to just kind of break down for you a chronology.
	And why am I focusing on Mark Levin?
	Interestingly enough, as we're trying to build fires, we're going back and taking...
	We would print all these articles.
	And so every day, you know, every other day we were going through a ream of paper.
	Maybe a little bit more than a ream of paper in two days.
	And so it's just a massive amount of stuff.
	And so my son, Whistler, said, hey, you need to get on one of these paperless things.
	And it has helped me to organize.
	But I can't throw this into the fire to warm us up.
	But I do have lots and lots of paper.
	Left from the first couple of years we did this stuff.
	And so we're going through and Karen was wadding the stuff up to throw into the fire.
	She said, look at this, and Mark Levin and the comments that I had.
	I said, what do you mean by this?
	I said, well, you know, and then I thought about that and I said, you know, I should go back and do a chronology of where Mark Levin has been on this vaccine, on the Trump zine, as Trump liked to call it.
	So if we go back to September of 2020, September 2020, Now, remember the lockdown had been going on for six months, the two weeks to flatten the curve.
	We had masks.
	We had Trump wearing masks, telling people that he looks really good in a mask.
	He's got a presidential seal on the cheek.
	And I've shown you the imperial march that he did with all the uniformed personnel because this was a military operation.
	This was a war on us.
	It began with sanctions.
	That's what the lockdowns were.
	Can't go anywhere. Can't work.
	I'm going to shut your business down because you're not essential.
	That all came from Trump. None of that was from Biden.
	None of it. None of it.
	Tim Pool. Tim Fool is more like it.
	But none of that came from Trump.
	Laura Looney. I'm sorry, from Biden.
	But it's all Biden's fault.
	Trump did nothing wrong.
	He's great. And Tim Foole said, I am just so sick and tired of talking about this for four years.
	And it's like, yeah, you know what? There's a lot of people who will never talk again, Tim.
	Because your hero killed them.
	And you've got blood on your hands now as well.
	And so, and there's a lot of people disabled.
	They won't be talking. Won't be working.
	Took the shot to keep their job.
	And the economic pressure.
	At one point, you'll hear...
	Laura Looney say, well, look, I know this sounds harsh, but, you know, you've got a choice to do this or not.
	If they say they're going to fire you, then, you know, and you decide to take this, well, that's the way it is.
	I didn't take it. Trump cheerleader didn't take it.
	Well, it's real nice for Laura Looney because she just put out a message saying, I want to go to New Hampshire and, you know, cheer for Trump and get on TV and all the rest of the stuff.
	And so I need $10 from 800 people.
	For my $8,000 trip.
	$8,000 trip.
	I mean, even if you adjust for inflation, Karen and I lived on our honeymoon in London.
	The tickets and everything else going there and back would not have been $8,000 in today's money.
	Yeah, we roughed it, but you're going to spend $8,000 to go on a trip?
	What, you got black limousines and stuff?
	Yeah. What a griff these people are.
	They really are amazing.
	But before I get to Tim Pool and Laura Looney, I want to talk about Mark Levin.
	Because, as I said, you know, we're getting ready to throw him into the fire last night, literally.
	So let me throw him into the fire metaphorically here right now.
	Going back to September of 2020, again, as I said, six months of lockdown, of masks, of social distancing.
	We had had...
	People, mass murder in the hospitals with the hospital death protocols that Trump was paying for.
	He told GM and Ford to shut down and make ventilators.
	The ventilators are killing over 90% of the people.
	Literally. I'm not exaggerating.
	Putting out remdesivir so that Fauci and Rand Paul could make money off of that.
	All of that had been going on.
	And then a month before this, this is September, in August, You had the American Hospital Association whining because they weren't getting paid.
	These prostitutes were not getting paid.
	So you had the whores moaning out there.
	You promised us a 20% bonus in addition to pointing the finger at somebody and getting $13,000 if we say they got COVID. And then if we put them on a ventilator, $39,000.
	And then we get to collect money every day until we kill them.
	And then you told us that you would give us a 20% bonus on that.
	And now you're saying you're not going to give us the bonus because we don't have the PCR test?
	You told us at the beginning. Just the PCR test, we don't have enough of them, and they don't work.
	So just do a clinical diagnosis.
	Just say they've got COVID. Help us out with this and we'll help you, right?
	That all was exposed in August.
	Now, I know it wasn't widely reported.
	I don't know anybody else that reported it, frankly.
	And I know that Mark Levin doesn't watch me.
	I don't watch Mark Levin.
	I typically see it when somebody else has featured some nonsense that he has done.
	And so he went on with Sean Hannity after we knew all of this stuff that I just mentioned.
	In September. And he said, the coronavirus vaccine scares the Democrats and the media.
	You see? This is good.
	Because with this coronavirus vaccine, it's good.
	It's going to heal everybody, and Trump is going to own the libs.
	They're very scared of this.
	You know, they want this thing that Trump did, which...
	The virus didn't do it to us.
	There wasn't any pandemic that did this.
	It was Trump's rules.
	It was actually Davos' rules and DARPA's rules that had been planning and scheming for a long time.
	Then fast forward, and we go to December of 2020.
	So from September, saying, yeah, he's going to own those libs.
	Well, he didn't. And he lost the election.
	And so then in December of 2020, Mark Levin goes on.
	And he says, Trump needs to be honored with a ticker tape parade for Operation Warp Speed's success.
	Now, I saw that And Parler had, Parler was off and on and, you know, they shut it down and then it came back.
	And I saw that and they brought it back.
	I got onto Parler and I went ballistic on Mark Levin.
	And as they say, I got ratioed.
	Everybody there hated my comments.
	How dare you criticize Mark Levin and Donald Trump?
	You know, they're going to save us and all the rest of this stuff.
	You're a Biden supporter.
	You know, the rest of this garbage.
	And I just, that's it.
	I'm done with Parler.
	I don't care about it.
	And, you know, that was it.
	Like a bunch of fools, a ship of fools.
	I'm not interested in, you know, in being there.
	Let me out of this room.
	These people are nuts.
	I got to get out of here before they start passing the Kool-Aid around.
	Anyway, he goes on, he says, Trump needs to be honored with a ticker tape parade.
	President Trump deserves a ticker tape parade.
	In days past, the development of miracle vaccines to save the lives of millions would be celebrated by all.
	They'd be cheering in the streets, said Levin.
	He said political opposition to Trump was behind this lack of credit given to him.
	You got to take credit for this, President Trump.
	Don't let Biden take this.
	I talked about that. I played that.
	And he did that for a couple of weeks.
	That was his shtick.
	For a couple of weeks.
	He says, but because President Trump drove the development of these vaccines in an unbelievably short period of time and forever improved the method by which vaccines will be developed now and in the future.
	It's being downplayed.
	It's appalling, he said.
	Did you catch that? He did it in an unbelievably short period of time.
	How do you do that? Skipped all the testing.
	And he forever improved the method by which vaccines will be developed and approved.
	In other words, as you see now, we don't test anything that the pharmaceutical companies do.
	It's just rubber stamping.
	And now they've opened the floodgates to MRNA stuff.
	And he thought it was appalling that Trump was not getting the credit he deserved for this.
	He went on to say, so let me be the first to say, and then he screams in all uppercase.
	The president deserves a ticket tape parade for what he's accomplished for all of mankind.
	Now, you know what he deserves? He deserves to be put on trial in Nuremberg.
	Like you, Mark Levin.
	Like you, Tim Pool.
	Like you, Laura Looney.
	You all need to be put on trial for crimes against humanity.
	To the president's credit, said Mediaite, who was reporting this, Media likes the vaccine, they just don't like Trump.
	And that's what he was saying.
	He said, yeah, you know, the vaccine's a miracle.
	Give Trump the credit.
	And that's what these people were doing.
	They said, well, you know, it's not his thing as the FDA did this.
	They said, to the president's credit, said media, numerous COVID... Vaccine candidates have successfully completed Phase 3 trials, and now it's highly likely that two will be approved and deployed to inoculate frontline healthcare workers before the end of the year.
	And I had predicted that back in December as well.
	I said, you know when they're going to mandate this?
	I said it'll be the fall of 2021, as school is going back.
	And as people are getting weary of this stuff, they'll do it in the fall.
	I'm on record.
	The articles are still up.
	So that was December, September, December 2020.
	Then, if you skip forward...
	And I'm trying to skip forward here on this thing.
	If only I had paper, right?
	Anyway, Mark Levin, going to January of 2022, okay?
	So essentially a year later.
	Mark Levin says, now there haven't been any tests for the COVID boosters.
	You're all guinea pigs, he said.
	This is the article that Karen found.
	She said, look at this. And look what you wrote on here.
	And what I wrote on there, I said, yeah, there haven't been any trials for these COVID boosters because they're no different, no different from what you were saying Trump needed to have a ticker tape parade for last year.
	Nothing has changed. That's part of the insanity of it.
	You know, we used to say, well, you know, we got a new strain, a new variant.
	And so you have to have more boosters.
	But sir, you haven't changed the vaccine yet.
	You haven't changed the vaccine.
	So what's the point of that?
	And of course, the first two shots didn't work anyway.
	And so anyway, he's saying that now you're a guinea pig.
	Now you're a guinea pig. And of course, the other politician they love so much, Bibi Netanyahu, Literally bragged to Davos on multiple occasions, as I played for you, that he was using all of the Israelis, all the Jews, as guinea pigs for Pfizer and Moderna.
	And he bragged to his masters at Davos about that.
	And so, is there any new method that forever improves the vaccines?
	Wasn't that what... What Trump did?
	You know, he said a year earlier, well, Trump not only got these things out quickly, but we got a new method.
	And we're going to be able to get vaccines out very quickly.
	Well, that's what it looks like, Mark Levin, except this is all political, right?
	Mark Levin was full on with the vaccine when it was Trump, screaming that people weren't giving Trump credit, they were giving Biden the credit.
	And now when Biden tells people to get boosted with the same vaccine, He's screaming, we're guinea pigs.
	What a pathetic, lying shill he is.
	These people, I just...
	He said, so what are we going to do?
	Get boosters for the rest of our lives?
	You get boosters for the rest of your lives.
	I'm going to become an anti-vaxxer.
	No, you're not. Because these people pay your tens of millions of dollars salary every year.
	You're just an anti-Bidener.
	Anti-Democrat. This guy is the epitome of what is wrong with partisan politics and the press.
	The partisan press.
	I'm going to become an anti-vaxxer because there's a point at which this stuff is extremely dangerous to your immune system.
	The stuff that Trump had pioneered a new way to do this?
	That's dangerous now? And how many?
	How many trials have been run with endless boosters from any of these vaccines?
	Answer, none! In that respect, you're all guinea pigs.
	But the Trump warp speed thing, they didn't have any tests.
	And it was unbelievably fast.
	And that was a good thing. And he forever improved vaccines.
	No, it's a...
	And he's not going to become an anti-vaxxer because those are the people who pay him.
	Okay, so that was a year after Biden had been in.
	And then fast forward one more year.
	February of 2023.
	Mark Levin.
	I've been having trouble breathing with minimum exertion.
	And I'm starting to think it was a vaccine booster.
	He said, I told you a couple weeks ago, I've been having trouble breathing with minimal exertion.
	And you know, last year I had a couple of stents and we went through a review of my heart, given my past with heart disease and so forth.
	And the heart's doing fine.
	And so now we're looking at the lungs and there's something going on with the lungs.
	So I had a CAT scan of that.
	We'll know in a day or two, but I'm starting to think if there's nothing there, that it was the vaccine booster.
	It was Biden's shot.
	It wasn't Trump's shot.
	It was Biden's shot that's harming him.
	And think about this.
	Mark Levin knows exactly what's going on.
	You know, here we are, 2023.
	Everybody knows what happened with all this stuff.
	Especially these people.
	This is why I have absolute...
	I cut them no slack whatsoever.
	I will not give them the benefit of the doubt because there is no doubt that they know all this stuff.
	They have their head buried in the news just like I do every day.
	And so... He knows all this stuff.
	And he's starting to get scared.
	Like Dan Bongino.
	Starting to get scared. Oh, I'm feeling something or the other.
	Is that the vaccine? So he says, we'll know in a day or two.
	If they can't find it in the heart, we'll see what happens with the lungs.
	And I've had some real specialists looking and looking.
	And then I believe I have to do something with that.
	It has to do something with that booster.
	Why didn't you say Biden? Biden is killing him.
	Not Trump. I don't think I'm surmising.
	I think it's just a matter of logic.
	All right, so let's summarize all this.
	Let's look at the timeline of this.
	September 2020, Trump's jab was going to own the libs.
	It's going to own the libs.
	And of course, Alex was telling everybody it was sugar water.
	You can take one for Trump, right?
	You can do it for him.
	It's not the bad stuff that Gates had.
	December, a couple months later.
	Trump needs a ticker tape parade.
	And he needs the credit.
	You know, he deserves this credit.
	And it was something that's forever changed, the way we do vaccines.
	And he's right about that.
	But not for the better.
	Then you go another year later.
	And now he's upset about the same vaccines because now these are boosters coming from Biden.
	And now you are a guinea pig.
	Another year later, and now he believes that it's caused him heart and lung issues, all the rest of the stuff, because he's been reading what's happening to other people.
	He knows, just like the FDA knows.
	And then where is he today?
	January 2024.
	Well, this is where the Levin sycophant is now.
	I've talked to a lot of important people.
	Supreme Court justices, presidents, presidential candidates, brilliant people.
	And talking with you is really the most impressive conversation I've had.
	Number one, there's very few people who could sit there and speak the way you do, from subject to subject to subject to subject.
	If people would let you speak and actually listen to you, while you have the enormous pressure on your shoulders...
	He's addressing Trump.
	...the things going on.
	What a disgusting sycophant he is.
	...to do it. That is absolutely remarkable.
	You are a remarkable liar, Mark Levin.
	I read these letters in this book.
	It was a phenomenal presidency.
	Phenomenal presidency. And the reason you don't get the credit that you deserve is because perhaps that's going to be up to history.
	Yeah, history's going to set it straight.
	And say, wait a minute, he was right about this, this, and this, and so forth.
	Yeah, I don't know, you know, history may not set it straight.
	A lot of people still think Abraham Lincoln was a great guy.
	The truth is out there for anybody that wants to look at it.
	The truth is going to be there for Trump.
	And the truth is already there.
	And Mark Levin already knows that those vaccines are bad.
	That's why he was freaking out in 2023.
	He's just a liar.
	Just a sycophant.
	And I'm sick of these people.
	So then, that brings us to last day or so.
	And you had Luke Radowski, had on Tim Poole, Laura Loomer, Tim Fool and Looney Loomer on.
	Luke has a weird change.
	I know Luke from Bilderberg meetings.
	I always thought he was a straight shooting guy.
	He always did really good work at Bilderberg.
	He chased these guys down and asked them the tough questions.
	He's asking some tough questions.
	To these Trump sycophants.
	And I want you to hear how Tim Pool can't handle this.
	He just can't handle it.
	I don't want to hear any more of these questions.
	Well, you haven't answered a single one, Tim.
	And, of course, Laura Looney is no better.
	Here's the exchange. We need an acknowledgement from Donald about what happened to Operation Warp Speed.
	There's been a lot of Americans that have been injured.
	One of them was here at the... I'm so sick of talking about this.
	We haven't had it.
	It's still a major issue because let's just say he comes into office.
	The CIA, Peter Daszak, Echo Health Alliance, all they have to do is restart and do whatever they need to do again because there isn't...
	A conversation about, hey, I learned my lesson.
	Hey, there's some mistakes. I should have done something better.
	Absolutely not. Absolutely not.
	When still, he's telling people to get boosted just a few freaking months ago.
	The policies, and it's funny when I see these centrist-type journalists who don't like Donald Trump actually arguing with people over this, and they're putting things like, man, I really don't like Trump.
	But Operation Warp Speed was therapeutics and vaccines by choice.
	It was never forcing people to get medical Laura Looney.
	Laura Looney.
	Everybody has choices. Everybody has free will.
	And I'm really sick and tired of listening to people say things like, oh, I would have lost my job.
	Or, oh, well, you know, I would have been fired.
	You either stand for something or you fall for everything.
	You don't stand for anything, do you?
	Trump did the lockdowns!
	You whore! President Trump never forced people to wear masks.
	People accepted it.
	Trump attacked Thomas Macy, who was against lockdowns.
	Trump attacked Sweden, who decided not to lock down.
	That's a fact. I still want an acknowledgement of it.
	And because we don't have an acknowledgement of it, because Trump still believes that the vaccine saved millions of hundreds of millions of lives.
	He believes the lockdowns save lives.
	Okay, I'll tell you why I'm done with this.
	Because the anti-Trump people say, Trump did the exact same thing Ron DeSantis did, but Trump was wrong when he did it.
	And then the DeSantis people are like, DeSantis did the same thing that Trump did, but DeSantis was right when he did it. I'm like, dude.
	That's what Trump just did, Tim!
	Donald Trump said 15 days until the spread.
	And we were all, not everybody, but a lot of people were like, okay, well, He came after Kemp and DeSantis when they went against his quote-unquote advice.
	I'm correct. No, Trump was correct. No wrong.
	Dude, I don't think we need to adjudicate what happened four years ago now that we have hindsight.
	Oh, you're going to forget the election then?
	That you keep talking about?
	And now what's going to happen is...
	If you can't criticize Trump on this, why are you going to...
	And now it's going to happen. Everyone's going to just keep going back to four years.
	Yeah. Four years ago. Four years ago.
	Four years. His grievance.
	I'm asking. I'm asking. He says he won the election.
	All I'm trying to say is that, you know, people have their opinions, very strong opinions about COVID. I'm, you know, the biggest Trump supporter there is, and I never took the vaccine, never got boosted, never will.
	I'm a proud anti-vaxxer.
	Did you tell people not to take it?
	I just want to see more personal...
	I'm losing my fucking mind.
	You guys won't shut the fuck up.
	Yeah, dude. That's what I felt like at the Zero Hedge debate, by the way.
	Dude, holy... Let's just not fuck over each other.
	I have had this debate 7,000 times.
	And you've never given anybody a straight answer, Tim.
	I agree with you.
	He did a thing. He did a thing.
	He did a thing. And now we are four years on with mass illegal immigration, 10,000 people per day, and you're talking about a vaccine program for four years ago!
	Mass murder.
	Worldwide, Tim.
	Donald Trump came out and said it should be your choice.
	Yes, that's my point. We're done.
	Do you guys think that the reason why we talk about...
	Yes! Okay, let's solve this.
	Marist is my friend.
	You don't have any friends.
	Nobody likes you.
	Not listening.
	Not listening. You're a liar.
	I'm not safe.
	Murderer. Go away.
	Go away!
	Yeah, yeah.
	That's it, Tim Pool.
	Watching Tim Pool there is like watching Gollum debate himself.
	Tim Pool knows he's a liar.
	He knows he's a thief.
	He knows he's a murderer.
	An accessory to murder.
	And his response is, not listening, not listening, go away, go away!
	And of course, assorted F-words.
	Trump did a thing four years ago.
	Okay, well, you know, just forget about the election then, too.
	Because, you know, Biden just did a thing.
	What Trump did throughout 2020 was to destroy our Constitution, destroy Main Street, destroy churches, anybody who followed his suggestions.
	And I told people in 2020, I'm not going to vote for Trump.
	I said, I know exactly you're right.
	Biden is going to mandate this stuff.
	But I said, what Trump is going to do is the kind of thing that we saw from DeWine.
	I'll offer you lots of money to take this.
	A chance, right?
	A chance at lots of money.
	You can win a million dollar lottery.
	You understand that most of these things were not done with mandates.
	And of course, so do Laura Loomer and Tim Pool.
	They understand it wasn't done with mandates.
	It was done with kind of coercion.
	That's the way the government always works.
	Again, they're not going to order people with a Tenth Amendment.
	Biden didn't mandate any of this stuff.
	He just coerced people.
	It was blackmail.
	It wasn't a mandate.
	And what Trump would have done, and Trump had already set the orders in to mandate it for the military, but he was going to go through the process of bribery.
	That's what he had done all through the year with both Democrat and Republican governors.
	And Democrat and Republican governors did this because he paid them.
	The hospitals killed people because he paid them.
	And then they injected nurses because they were going to pull the pay away.
	And I said, the only difference between Trump and Biden is that maybe Biden will wake people up.
	And of course, he didn't wake them up to Trump.
	But what he did was he woke them up to some of these things.
	And so I stand by that. Because I think if it had been Trump, you would have had even more people, conservatives, take it.
	The liberals would have taken it anyway.
	But even though in the fall, they were saying, well, I'm not taking Trump's shot.
	But as soon as Biden became president, they took his shot.
	So, yeah, the miracle jab.
	And these people who just, I'm not listening, I'm not listening, go away.
	It was four years ago, who cares?
	Well, the people who are mourning loved ones care.
	People whose family were murdered in hospitals.
	People who lost their livelihood, their business, that was their blood, sweat, and tears, even if they didn't lose their life.
	People who've been permanently disabled from these things.
	I think they care, Tim.
	And I hope they flush you and your piece of excrement politician down the toilet.
	I just, I can't stand these people.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	Yeah, and then, of course, we also have the guy that...
	I was telling people it was sugar water.
	This is a commercial, by the way.
	See how he leaves himself a hedge?
	And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
	Gates goes, trust my vaccine, but don't trust the CDC's vaccine.
	He didn't have a second vaccine.
	I went and looked up the ones that Trump's looking at.
	They're very weak, attenuated, classic viruses with a very low amount of adjuvant in it.
	Total liar. And what is adjuvant?
	Total liar. You have an autoimmune response.
	Because a lot of times... Pegulated nanoparticles plus adjuvants.
	Plus SV40. You're not going to have the autoimmune response.
	You're not going to form antibodies. So they've got to give you...
	The squalene or the mercury or the aluminum...
	You can take a little bit of mercury, right?
	Inject it. So, yeah, Trump's looking at sugar water for folks.
	Sugar water. Take a little bit of attenuated, you know, microwaved or radiated...
	COVID deal? Absolutely. Oh, yeah.
	COVID's already everywhere anyways. Yeah, take it.
	It's good for you. It's basically sugar water.
	It's basically sugar water.
	Well, it's not. He's lying, of course, as usual.
	And hedging is bad.
	Am I supporting what he's doing?
	No, I'm not. I'm just doing commercials telling you that he's playing 4D chess.
	But I'm not supporting what he's doing.
	I love him. I love him not.
	I love him. I love him not.
	Well, as they were talking about, and I think maybe what Luke was suggesting, Luke Kradowski was suggesting, was he says, can't we just have a politician who says, I did the wrong thing?
	Because DeSantis did say that, right?
	And you remember two weeks into this, Kemp said, we're not doing this anymore.
	And then DeSantis said, we're not doing it anymore.
	And then what was Trump doing? You people locked down people.
	And it's like it was such a suggestion, your strong suggestion and your bribery and all the rest of this stuff.
	They said, yeah, it was wrong.
	And now they're going further. It's been a very slow process to get them turned around.
	But DeSantis appointed as Florida Surgeon General, Dr.
	Joseph Latipo. And he's been going on with several different media events.
	He went on with Tucker. He went on with Epic TV. And he's saying, you've got to stop these COVID shots for everybody.
	Not just for kids.
	They said that first about kids, DeSantis and Latipo did.
	They said this is a mistake.
	We should have never done this.
	Now they're saying it's a mistake.
	We should never have done this for everybody.
	He said, saying that while there are also safety concerns with the COVID mRNA vaccines linking them to a multitude of adverse events, he said, this recent discovery about DNA contamination is, quote, beyond the pale.
	DNA, he says, is a common contaminant of many biological products.
	He said we can use DNA to produce different drugs like insulin or other biologics.
	And it's a wonderful innovation.
	Normally, DNA doesn't pose a problem.
	Human cells are resistant to DNA entry.
	This prevents harming the integrity of the cell's DNA. However, since the mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles, and oh, by the way, we knew that.
	When Alex was doing that, we knew that.
	Children's Health Defense, RFK Jr.'s thing had already said, you got pegylated stuff in there?
	People, polyethylene glycol, people are going to have shock from that.
	They're going to go into anaphylactic shock.
	Contacted the FDA. The FDA said, we don't care.
	Call Pfizer. Pfizer said, we don't care.
	And they did it. But then there's something else that's unique about this.
	Not only is it pegylated, which we already knew was a big warning sign for a lot of people, but it was also lipid nanoparticles.
	Delivers the mRNA into the cells directly.
	DNA contaminants could also be able to enter the cells with this stuff.
	So it's very different.
	The mechanism, the nanoparticle delivery mechanism, is very different.
	Some scientists, like Dr.
	Ladipo, are concerned that the DNA from the vaccine may integrate with the human genome.
	Prominent officials, they said, at the FDA disagree.
	Well, no, actually, they disagree with their own rules.
	You see, this isn't even an issue about the new technology.
	By their own hard and fast rules, if there is DNA contamination to a particular level, then you can't put those vaccines out.
	And that is clearly the case here.
	You can objectively determine that.
	And then in addition to that, you have the nanoparticle aspect of this that means that that DNA, which is excessive and exceeds their own rules at the FDA, that excessive amount of DNA contamination can be has a possibility of being integrated in a way that normal DNA contamination would not be accessible to the human body.
	So he sent a letter to the FDA commissioner and in his letter he asked if there had been a risk assessment of the vaccine, DNA integrating into human DNA, especially regarding the controversial SV40.
	This goes back to the early polio shots that were in the 1950s for kids.
	And we know from a fact from history that the simian virus 40 created a surge in cancer for children that were given those polio vaccines.
	Well, that's back in this. I'm sure it's just an accident.
	You know, it's nothing bad. It's just sugar water, said Alex, right?
	Sugar water with, you know, a little bit of SV40 and nanoparticles and DNA contaminants and all the rest of this stuff.
	Sugar water. He says, well, we've gotten a lengthy response, but no answer to the question, said Dr.
	Latipo. A lengthy response from the FDA, but they won't answer the question.
	Dr. Marks wrote that DNA integration is, quote, quite implausible, adding that animal studies show, quote, no evidence indicative for genotoxicity.
	However, they've not done any tests.
	And so Latipo says, well, their position is, oh, no, it's fine.
	Everything's fine. Everything is safe and effective.
	Well, that's not only not good enough, but But it's completely unacceptable.
	And that's why I made the determination.
	It's absolutely the correct call.
	In other words, you should be doing tests.
	And we had these long time frames for things to be approved for a reason.
	And again, going back to October 2019, Fauci saying, in answer to a question at one of these pharmaceutical conferences, how are you going to get everybody to take an untested new vaccine?
	Everybody in the world. Well, you do it from the inside.
	You do it with disruption.
	And you do it iteratively.
	You know, the boosters and all the rest of this stuff.
	Gradually increasing the coercion and the pressure in society.
	Would the FDA ever do something like this to the Boeing 737s?
	Of course not. Oh, by the way.
	Anthony Blinken takes a 737 to Davos.
	Not just an ordinary private jet, but he takes a jet that would carry hundreds of people, you know, for his own personal use.
	And then it has problems, and he has to switch to another plane.
	Well, the 737s are grounded.
	Maybe they were trying to do, what was that guy's name?
	Uh... That was a friend of the Clintons that they got rid of, Ron something or the other.
	I can't remember. Anyway, it was his plane crash.
	Both Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines contain DNA contaminants, but only the Pfizer vaccines have also been found to contain SV40. A DNA virus that sometimes causes cancer in animals.
	And that's what they said.
	They're very careful about it. Let me not be so careful.
	Let me say it frequently caused cancer in children, human children.
	We know that from experience.
	He said, he went on to say, nobody's talking about the SV40 protein.
	We talked about the promoter and the enhancer region.
	And Dr. Latipo said this.
	They have to be doing it intentionally.
	This is intentional.
	And this is not just Biden and the Democrats, folks.
	Give me a break.
	Tim and Laura.
	We are the most complex beings, the most complex machines, if you will, said a lot of Poe, living machines that exist on this earth.
	So I do believe that our genome is part of our connection to God.
	So that is to say that there's quite a lot at risk in terms of not taking proper precautions.
	And sensible precautions, you know, skipping the testing like Trump did and bragged about it.
	There's problems with maintaining the integrity to the best that we can.
	Life ain't perfect, but to the best that we can to protect the human genome.
	And, you know, many people listed this very thing as part of their religious exemption in 2021.
	And as I've said before, people were saying about the mRNA, well, it's not going to modify your DNA. mRNA can't modify DNA. It just copies it.
	I said, oh, wait a second. If you're copying something, You can also introduce copying errors, can't you?
	But even more importantly, you had Thomas Jefferson University, before this stuff rolled out, by the way, talked about this, because I was talking for a long time about this mRNA technology, and at Thomas Jefferson University, They were able to deliberately modify DNA using mRNA.
	It's not a theory.
	It doesn't even have to be an error.
	And it is something that definitely modifies it.
	On Rockfin. Zoxo Voxoz.
	I guess. Thank you very much for the tip.
	And writes, consistent pandemicide coverage.
	Well, thank you.
	Yeah, trying to persist on that stuff.
	It's getting harder and harder.
	Because the lies are just so blatant anymore.
	And I'm just so sick of these people who are using this for their careers.
	You know, Tim Pool and Laura Loomer are a couple of social climbers.
	How pathetic. How pathetic that you would support this stuff to get an audience, to be able to go on with Alex and all the rest of this stuff and do your little zero-hedge debate and all the rest.
	You're pathetic, Tim. You're disgusting.
	I know we don't wrestle against flesh and blood.
	I've got to keep reminding myself of that.
	But you need an exorcism, pal.
	Rumble, Atomic Dog, I know women that got vaxxed due to employer mandate.
	A woman. She was hesitant, so her dad said he would get vaxxed with her.
	She developed autoimmune disease and her dad died.
	And she has great regret now.
	Yeah, you see, this is what the Biden people and Fauci people, you know, I didn't tell nobody to get no vaccine.
	I didn't force nobody to do anything, right?
	You had some people, like Alan Dershowitz said, oh, no, I would send the police to your door, the medical police to your door.
	I would have them drag you out by force and stick this needle into your arm by force.
	And I would defend that before the Supreme Court, said Dershowitz, and I would win.
	And Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer.
	I wonder what kind of experience he's had forcing people to have things inserted into them.
	But these are the types of people that we deal with.
	And that's the kind of prevarication that they give you.
	To say, I'm not forcing anybody.
	So he was saying, that's what actually forcing people is.
	And I'm fine with that. But these are not mandates.
	This is just arm twisting and coercion and saying, you're not going to go anywhere or do anything or have an education or friends or do, you've got to get this or we're going to take everything from you.
	And that's what we're going to be fighting, folks.
	This is a trial run.
	It was a trial run. And it's going to be coming back.
	And Luke is right.
	People like Trump are going to come at us again.
	And it'll be far more effective when Trump does it because he's going to have the Tim Pools and the Laura Loomers who are going to tell everybody, it's okay.
	And Alex Jones is, I know it looks bad.
	I know it looks really bad, but hey, this is not a problem.
	It would be bad if the other guy, it'd be bad if Gates did it or Biden did it.
	But, you know, this is coming from Trump, so I'm sure that he's got our best interests at heart.
	So just go along.
	Get into the cattle car.
	I'm sure it's taking you to a nice place.
	Okay? So you see, drafted an alert for myocarditis and COVID-19 vaccines, but they never sent it.
	You see, they know as well. Everybody knows.
	Everybody has known.
	These people who lied to you.
	And again, they'll always say, I didn't force anybody to do it.
	Fauci says it.
	Trump says it. Laura Loomer says it.
	The CDC prepared to alert state and local officials to an emerging connection between heart inflammation.
	But ultimately, they didn't send the alert.
	All four Trump shots.
	And again... Benedict Donald said, call it the Trump scene.
	He said that back in April of 2021.
	The Trump scene.
	The vaccine and the Trump scene.
	I call it the Trump shot.
	All four of these Trump shots available in the United States can cause heart inflammation or myocarditis, according to studies.
	Experts and agencies like the CDC understand that.
	And they knew it back in May of 2021.
	And, of course, Mark Levin knew it.
	That's why he was so afraid when he started having heart and breathing issues.
	But, of course, we won't blame Trump for that.
	But he will answer for that one day.
	Probably not on this earth.
	He'll stand before God one day.
	All these people will.
	You and I will as well. And it isn't going to be, what did you do during the war, daddy?
	It's going to be you knew. You knew and you told people lies for your own benefit.
	And these pharmakia, the great men of the world, as was said 2,000 years ago, would not repent of their murders.
	Oh, but they were great men.
	They had everybody listening to them, everybody following them, everybody sending them money.
	They had everything they needed.
	This censorship of proposed alert in May of 2021 is just one more example of our regulatory agency's repeated pattern of behavior to censor any information That serves to counter the narrative that the COVID-19 vaccinations were safe and effective.
	And yet, we hear censorship all the time, right?
	And yeah, they want to shut you down if you question whether this is safe and effective.
	And yet, you had the right-wing media that complains about censorship telling you it was sugar water.
	Telling you it was Trump's stuff and it was okay.
	And they're the ones who are censoring and shutting down and deceiving people about the truth about these shots.
	Did it four years ago and doing it now.
	That's why we keep this up, Tim, because you've been doing it for four years.
	You've been deceiving people for four years.
	You're a lot more popular now.
	Good for you. Good for you.
	The CDC and other agencies have also repeatedly not disclosed other information that undermines their promotion of the vaccines, including how many COVID-19 cases there were among the vaccinated.
	Yeah, they hide all of this stuff, and this is nothing new.
	One person said it's a double standard.
	Dr. Tracy Hoag, an epidemiologist based in California, one of the first experts to challenge the CDC narrative on post-vaccination myocarditis.
	And, of course, it is really humorous, isn't it?
	You've got myocarditis, you've got pericarditis, and those were associated immediately, immediately, within the first month or so of these shots going out.
	And they became household wards.
	I remember having to look them up for the first time.
	But just recently, you've seen them talk about endocarditis.
	Endocarditis. And then they say, well, that's due to fentanyl.
	No, it's not. These are all just, it's just a different, it's just an infection of a different part of the heart.
	Just like pericarditis is the outside lining of the heart.
	And that got Franklin Graham.
	He had pericarditis.
	They had the open heart surgery on him and take off the lining of his heart.
	It gets hardened from this infection and inflammation and the heart can't work.
	But, you know, Pericarditis, myocarditis, and endocarditis, they're all from the same thing.
	They're all from the spike, and yet they want to pretend, because nobody had heard about, there hadn't been much talk about endocarditis.
	Oh, well, this is something completely different.
	We must have a new variant out there.
	Yeah. So, why would they issue one for the J&J vaccine for blood clots, but not for myocarditis post-mRNA vaccination?
	That's Dr. Tracy Hoeg.
	We had data from our own Department of Defense at this time indicating that it was a real safety signal and two fatal post-Pfizer vaccination myocarditis cases that had already been reported in Israel.
	Or BB was using people as lab rats.
	He said CDC officials involved in the draft should testify.
	I think it's going to be crucial to figure out who decided that the alert shouldn't be sent at all.
	After all, they had apparently already written it.
	Well, the problem is much, much bigger than even what he is stating.
	And it was much, much earlier than May of 2021.
	As I said, we knew it from the very beginning.
	One of the amazing things, how many people had adverse reactions and how many people were having them immediately.
	We'd never seen that with a vaccine before.
	That was one of the things that made it difficult to catch these people who are poisoners.
	You know, you poison people, they die gradually, and you can do it very subtly over a period of time.
	So usually it took a while for the effects of the poison to show up.
	But it showed up right away with this stuff.
	All these people knew.
	Everybody knew. And so now they've got a new thing to scare you.
	And so now they're bringing back measles to try to recover the anti-vaccine sentiment that these poisonous shots have produced.
	They think, well, if we can go back to the things that everybody thinks works, like measles.
	And so you've got these reports, hair-on-fire reports about measles showing up.
	Here's Fox. Don't
	touch anything! Okay, well, you know, you're seeing the same thing popping up in all these different places, right?
	And in the UK, measles is spreading like wildfire across the UK, thanks to the anti-vaxxers.
	And they show pictures of adults with this.
	Didn't the adults have the shot?
	You know, a few years ago, I remember talking about this way before this pandemic.
	They said, well, we've got this measles outbreak in New York, and they were trying to use that to take away exemptions, which they didn't get taken away until May of 2019 with the assistance from this guy.
	They have to get the shot.
	The vaccinations are so important.
	It's really going around now.
	They have to get their shot.
	Yeah, no religious exemptions, no medical exemptions.
	And, of course, that guy, older than me, grew up without any measles shots.
	He knows it's not a big deal.
	You know, it's a very, very, very, very rare situation that somebody has an issue with measles.
	All parents would have their kids get these childhood diseases.
	My parents, Karen's parents, I was in Florida, she was in New York, everybody was doing that.
	And there were no reports about people dying from this stuff.
	It could be serious if you got it later in life.
	But as a child, you know, you're just down for a few days and now you've got lifetime immunity, which when they came back and prior to May of 2018, where California, New York, New Jersey, other places were saying, we're going to take away your exemptions for this and your decisions about your own health care.
	That's where a part of the precedent that was put in by Trump.
	And so they were saying, no, no, no, we don't care what your medical issues are or what your religious issues are.
	You're going to get this shot. You've got to get this shot.
	It's really going around here.
	Well, they had already run that rodeo several times before.
	One time in New York, they had four cases of measles, they said, and they freaked out.
	And I reported on it at the time.
	And one of the things that they said was, you know, all four of these people said, We're good to go.
	Had been multiply vaxxed.
	So now we've got, listen to this fear language coming out of the UK paper.
	That was Fox News.
	The UK is in the grip of a sudden spike in measles, with health officials declaring an outbreak as a national incident.
	The surge has been linked to a decline in vaccine uptake as a rise in health disinformation and anti-vax conspiracy theories has put parents off of getting their children jabbed.
	There were 209 laboratory-confirmed cases in 2023.
	How many people died?
	209 cases out of how many millions of people in the UK? And how many people died?
	None. Almost quadrupled the number that was recorded the previous year.
	Well, you know, when I was growing up, we had millions of cases of measles a year.
	And it was not a problem.
	And people got lifetime immunity.
	The measles virus can remain infectious in the air for up to two hours after an infected person leaves.
	So wear your cloth diaper on your face.
	They're not going to do anything. See, it's all about that narrative.
	An infected person will spread the disease to 20 others on average.
	Nine out of ten people who aren't vaccinated will catch the disease if they're near an infected person.
	And sometimes, 100% of the people who are vaccinated will be a little mini-outbreak.
	100% of them.
	Four out of four. Vaccinated, multiply vaccinated.
	See how they're hyping this stuff up.
	And of course, what Fox News is doing there was the same thing that they did back in 2019 when Newsom in California and others said we're going to have to get rid of religious exemptions and medical exemptions.
	Everybody's got to get the shot. Oh, at an airport, we got somebody who had measles and, you know, this could be an epidemic or something.
	Nobody died. It was no big deal.
	But, you know, people do get autism, and they get the rest of this stuff from this, whether or not it works.
	All this is really based on what?
	On credentials.
	All the scientism of Fauci.
	I am science. Look at my science.
	And we've seen this, MacGuffin, before.
	They do the same thing with the climate stuff.
	Look at my credentials.
	I graduated from Harvard or from MIT. Yeah, those kind of credentials...
	You know, whenever I see people appealing to their credentials, to their degrees, to the college that they attended, I always think of this.
	Back where I come from, we have universities, seats of great learning, where men go to become great thinkers.
	And when they come out, they think deep thoughts, and with no more brains than you have.
	But they have one thing you haven't got, a diploma.
	Therefore, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the universitatis comitiatum e pluribus unum, I hereby confer upon you the honorary degree of THD. THD? That's Doctor of Thinkology.
	Some of the square roots of any two sides of an isosceles triangle is equal to the square root of the remaining side.
	F.
	Oh, John!
	I've got a brain!
	No, you don't.
	You don't know anything, either.
	He gets an F on that class.
	He doesn't know what the Pythagorean theorem is.
	And I think that a lot of people say, well, that's what these people are doing.
	They know exactly what they're doing.
	You know, he's paraphrasing the E. Pluribus Unum and all the rest of this stuff, I mean.
	And so, misstating the Pythagorean theorem was a joke to the audience, and the audience would have caught it in those days.
	Today, you have to be somebody who's, you know, a science or an engineering major to catch that.
	But back then, people, when they went to college, they had trigonometry.
	And if you don't do trigonometry without doing the Pythagorean theorem, or as my Indian professor, Mukherjee, used to say, the Pythagorean theorem.
	The person's like, what did he say?
	It's like, okay, I got it.
	Technocrats have long told us what we can and cannot do, what we are allowed to own, what our kids must learn in school, and so on.
	For the most part, we never voted for any of that, and yet we've gone long docilely, not noticing, not caring, or at best, unwilling to make any waves.
	The result has been the rise of self-selected experts, quote-unquote.
	The credentialed class, who exist primarily to impose their will on others.
	Their ranks have swelled recently with the exponential growth of government and education bureaucracies, and the emergence of academic programs designed not to increase knowledge, but to feed those bureaucracies.
	Well, they're designed to deliberately dumb us down, as Charlotte Iserby pointed out.
	And this is nothing new.
	When Francis Bacon put out his scientific method, What did he hold it up in juxtaposition to?
	He said, well, right now, everybody just goes along with arguments from authority.
	And that was coming from academia, coming from the universities.
	Where I come from, we have places we call universities.
	And they hand out pieces of paper to people, and that makes them automatically smart.
	And so Francis Bacon said, no.
	No, that's not the way we want to do science.
	Here's how we do science. You tell me what you think is happening.
	You show me your data. I try to replicate it.
	We debate this and all the rest of the stuff, and that's how we do science.
	Instead of just taking the word of somebody who is very well-known, I've used the example many times, the Wright brothers and Langley, who was head of the Smithsonian, and he was one of the most respected academic people and science people at the time.
	He couldn't get his machine to fly because...
	He was using the respected and established lift tables that were wrong.
	But, of course, they were coming from the most respected institutions, and the Wright brothers did their own, did their own observations.
	They actually did science, whereas he was doing academia.
	This is what I refer to as credentialism.
	This is an article by Campus Reform.
	The pursuit of dubious credentials like degrees in pseudosciences and quasi-academic subjects solely for the purpose of advancing one's own career and personal policy preferences.
	You see, it's always that personal advancement.
	If I lie to people, you know, I can, I know what they want to hear.
	I can tell them what they want to hear. The term might also apply to those with legitimate credentials who, in their hubris, believe being an expert gives them the right to tell everybody else how to live.
	Much to the dismay of the credentialed class, America's tolerance of this system began to wane about four years ago, except for people like Tim Pool.
	When it became apparent to many that the experts don't know what they're talking about, because, again, to take another metaphor from The Wizard of Oz, they saw that the man behind the curtain...
	It was actually a blustering charlatan, including the guy who put him on the pedestal.
	Anyone who was paying attention could see as early as April 2020 that much of what the experts were telling us about masks and social distancing and school closures had no basis in science.
	And it's true of all the climate stuff as well.
	This is key. To pop the illusion.
	The collapse has been hastened by the medical and scientific establishments' embrace of transgenderism.
	But you know, all you have to do is put political blinkers on people.
	And you have to tell them how bad the people in that other party are over there.
	And they will just forget everything.
	And follow the other charlatan.
	And so our charlatans have gone from professors to politicians.
	Actually, they've collaborated with all this stuff.
	You know, when you look at Harvard's president that was just fired for plagiarism, gay, right?
	And that's what he goes on to talk about as part of the collapse of this stuff.
	The fall of credentialism, Claudine Gay's resignation, everything.
	Well... You know, she plagiarized, I don't even know what she plagiarized, I didn't really even bother to look at it, because as far as I'm concerned, the Ivy League universities were discredited a long time ago, and that's spread, you know, it's rotted from the top down, to where it's pretty much all of the different universities here.
	But when we talk about this so-called pandemic, Understand that Trump, you know, it's not the president of Harvard that you need to think about, but was the president, the once and future president, perhaps, of the United States, who plagiarized all this stuff from a liar like Fauci.
	Yeah. Forget about all the stuff about the Harvard president being a plagiarist.
	Trump was plagiarizing and repeating and elevating everything that Fauci said.
	But you need to hate Fauci, hate the mask, hate the lockdowns, hate the social distancing, hate the vaccine, but love the guy who gave it all to us, who paid for every bit of it.
	That's what people like Laura Looney want to tell you.
	We'll be right back. Thank
	you. Making
	sense. Common again.
	you're listening to the David Knight show.
	Well let's talk a little bit about finances because again, Wall Street Journal just told us this week, it may look like a recession to you.
	It may feel like a recession to you, but it's not a recession.
	See, I've got the numbers here, and I've got the charts, and I can explain this to you.
	Because we just revised those numbers from where they were the previous quarter.
	See the improvement that's coming up?
	Same game they've always played.
	And again, the experts, the economists in this particular case, the court jesters of the White House, will explain all this to you.
	So again, do not do any critical thinking.
	Forget about what you see happening.
	You see your friends and relatives dropping dead.
	You see sports players dropping dead.
	Forget about all that stuff.
	Just listen to what Trump and Fauci and Biden and Fauci tell you.
	Jamie Dyden, as we were talking about money here, let's talk a little bit about Bitcoin.
	I don't usually talk about Bitcoin.
	And I've had some people say, well, you know, you're really missing the boat here.
	I may be. And it's just my past experiences with the stock market and other things like that.
	I'm just not interested in And something that isn't real tangible, something I can't hold in my hand or live inside of, I'm not really interested in anymore.
	Because I just don't have that much left after I got interested in stocks.
	That got me real focused on trying to preserve what I had left.
	But let's talk about the Bitcoin stuff.
	Because that has a lot of different...
	The biggest banks trying to shut down and control everything and redo the financial system.
	And all of this is part of it.
	And this war on Bitcoin is really a war on freedom.
	I support people's right to have Bitcoin.
	And it's these bad actors like Jamie Dimon and Elizabeth Warren and others who are trying to lock us into a kind of financial slavery.
	Jamie Dimon calls Bitcoin excrement.
	He doesn't exactly use that term.
	Because he confuses it with fiat money.
	I like that headline. That's from Zero Hedge.
	A lot has changed since 2017, back then.
	In what was the first recorded comments by Jamie Dimon on the topic of Bitcoin and crypto, the head of J.P. Morgan was not shy to let the world know how he felt.
	Back then, the Dimon said...
	The cryptocurrency, quote, won't end well, unquote.
	Predicting it will eventually blow up.
	He called it a fraud. He said it's worse than tulip bulbs.
	If that wasn't enough, Deeman also said that a J.P. Morgan trader began trading in Bitcoin.
	He said if they started doing that, I'd, quote, fire them within a second for two reasons.
	It's against our rules, and they're stupid.
	And both of those things are dangerous.
	I remember when he said that.
	I remember talking about that at length.
	As he points out, here we are now, six years later.
	He says, since 2017, Bitcoin has gone up more than 4,000%, making it the single best-performing asset class in the world, if not in history.
	Unlike tulip bulbs, and you remember the tulip bulb thing, actually, you know, I think it...
	Remember, for instance, The Madness of Crowds, that was the book that talked about that.
	You had the South Sea Bubble, bubble in real estate.
	You had the tulip bulb stuff.
	I forget which one of it was.
	Maybe it was both of them. Snooker and Isaac Newton, a guy who was so smart that he formulated the basis of physics and calculus together.
	He could predict the tides, but he couldn't predict...
	The madness of crowds.
	And he got caught up in it multiple times.
	Unlike tulip bulbs, Bitcoin has gone through not one, but two, and maybe even at least not one, not two, but three cycles already, and has yet to be shown to be a bubble, let alone one that has burst.
	As for firing any JPMorgan trader who trades Bitcoin, well, not only is Jamie now rewarding Bitcoin traders at JPMorgan, which now has a dedicated crypto Bitcoin research section, as well as a dedicated crypto client coverage and trading desk,
	but the bank recently became the broker-dealer to iShares Bitcoin Trust, an ETF! So he doesn't like it unless he can create a derivative off of it.
	That's where I think the real scam is.
	Most people are saying, well, now it's going to get the traders in.
	It's going to get on the market and everything.
	And now, you know, we may see some kind of a bubble off of this thing.
	But I think that the ETF stuff is going to be used to manipulate the price of Bitcoin, just like they've used ETFs to manipulate the price of gold and silver in the past.
	Just like they use derivatives to crash the real estate market.
	A lot has changed since 2017, says Zero Hedge, even if Jamie's epic hypocrisy remains largely unchanged.
	We say that because earlier today, the CEO of the largest bank popped up on CNBC Davos livestream, where he did what else?
	He bashed Bitcoin.
	Let's just put this in perspective.
	As I pointed out yesterday, J.P. Morgan has just paid an $18 million fine.
	That's peanuts to them. They've already, like HSBC and these other two big-to-fail banks, have paid billions of dollars in fines after they've been convicted of crimes.
	And it was still peanuts to them.
	You know, HSBC, when they paid billions of dollars for money laundering, as Matt Taibbi pointed out when he was at Rolling Stone, too big to jail banks.
	And that's really what Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, said at the time.
	Well, yeah, this is a big crime.
	Anybody else would go to jail.
	These people are just too big.
	We can't do that. They're too important to the economy.
	How did they get that big?
	Well, you had the rash of mergers that were set off by the Clinton administration, waiving rules and all the rest of this stuff.
	So, they get these fines and they just...
	Shove them aside. And so this isn't even billions of dollars.
	I mean, this is just, I don't know, paperclip money here for JPM. And so they paid an $18 million fine to the SEC about threatening whistleblowers and trying to preemptively stop anybody from reporting anything to the SEC. And the SEC said, you can't do that. They didn't admit any guilt.
	They paid the fine and they let him go.
	And then, as I pointed out, Goldman Sachs.
	It's just been found to have dumped billions of dollars worth of stocks, the same stocks they were hyping to their clients at that time.
	So he shows up to bash Bitcoin.
	And then he says, in general, about cryptocurrencies, he says, first of all, he says, blockchain is real.
	It's a technology. We use it.
	It's going to move money. It's going to move data.
	It's efficient. So what he's talking about is CBDC. Because he's with Elizabeth Warren.
	And so he wants, you know, blockchain.
	Let me tell you. Just as the internet...
	And the web has been used to ensnare us, to spy on us, to capture everything about our lives and keep it in a permanent record.
	Yeah, that's the title of Ed Snowden's book.
	But yeah, it is all about creating a life log.
	That was what Facebook replaced their life log program.
	It is a web.
	It is a net. And let me tell you that the blockchain stuff, if they can shut down this other stuff, They will use the blockchain for CBDC and things like that.
	And they will use it as chains of slavery.
	Just like the net and the web have become a means for doing that.
	And then he started talking about cryptocurrencies.
	And he said, there's two types of cryptocurrencies.
	There's a cryptocurrency which might actually do something.
	Think of it using it to buy and to sell real estate or to move data.
	Tokenizing things that you do something with.
	In other words, that's the stuff that we control.
	And then he said, and then there's the crypto that does nothing, and I call it the pet rock, the Bitcoin, or something like that.
	And so on Bitcoin, he said, there are use cases, of course, for Bitcoin.
	You know, the only thing anybody would use Bitcoin for, of course, is fraud, money laundering, tax avoidance, sex trafficking.
	Those are real use cases.
	You know, I've said before, isn't it interesting how Democrats and liberals and bankers like J.P. Morgan, Jamie, Diamond, Demon, I'm sorry, Demon, Demon, that's what I need to refer to him as.
	Isn't it funny how he projects those things onto other people?
	Fraud? Yeah, I just paid a fine for that.
	Tax avoidance, sex trafficking, I mean, they just had a massive case that they paid off people, hundreds of millions of dollars.
	Because it was his own bank, JP Morgan, that was involved with the most famous sex trafficking cases around Jeffrey Epstein.
	Those are real use cases for Jamie Dimon and for JP Morgan, aren't they?
	But he projects that onto Bitcoin.
	And he didn't use Bitcoin, perhaps, to do any of that stuff.
	No, he used cash.
	He used the banking system.
	Even though they got all these know your customer rules and all the rest of this stuff, that's all done through the banks and through the Federal Reserve fiat currency.
	And so he says, those are the use cases for the stuff I don't like.
	And so he said, Zero Hedge says, but the guy who was interviewing him, Sorkin, refused to stop at that point.
	And so he pushed Demon as to why BlackRock and Larry Fink changed their view on Bitcoin.
	And then Demon erupted and said, just please stop talking about this excrement.
	Just like Tim Pool, right?
	It's like tempo. I am so tired of hearing about Bitcoin.
	People have been talking to me about Bitcoin for six years.
	People have been talking to me about how Donald Trump killed people with vaccines and locked us down and enslaved us and overthrew the rule of law and all the rest of this medical martial law.
	I am tired of hearing about that.
	Let's vote for him again. And he's like, I'm sick and tired of hearing about this excrement.
	That's what he called it. Yeah, of course he used it.
	Four-letter word. Therefore, he says, I don't know what he would say about blockchain versus currencies that do something versus Bitcoin that does nothing, in terms of Larry Fink.
	He says, but that's what makes a market.
	People have differing opinions.
	They said, so what about Larry Fink with BlackRock?
	Why is he like the Bitcoin stuff?
	And he goes, well, I don't know what he would say, but I'm tired of talking about it.
	Stop asking me about Bitcoin.
	So... He went on to explain why he thinks Bitcoin is excrement.
	He said in the exchange as it went on that he basically thinks that somehow Maybe Satoshi is going to mystically reappear and increase the supply of Bitcoin over the 21 million to which it is structurally limited.
	He says, one person summarized his comments by saying that and said, and this guy runs the world's biggest bank.
	And so why do they say that they, you know, they're joking about Satoshi coming back, but he says what he did say.
	He says, how do you know that Bitcoin is going to stop at 21 million?
	And he keeps asking that year after year.
	And Jameson Lopp said, bro, it's five lines of code, and not even Satoshi can force us to change it.
	In other words, it's right there.
	Everybody can see it? Now, these are not the issues that I have with it, but you can see the contours of how they want to restructure the financial system for control and how they use these front men for it, just like they used front men for the pharmaceutical stuff.
	They commented, they said, remember when the U.S. government and the Fed printed 40% of all the U.S. dollars ever created, and they did it just in 2020?
	They created 40% of all.
	That's why I had David Stockman on to talk about Trump's war on capitalism.
	It really was a war on capitalism.
	It was a war on Main Street.
	It was a war on those of us that he deemed to be not essential.
	And it was a war in which he did everything that DARPA and Davos have been talking about doing, planning to do, and practicing to do for decades.
	But don't believe any of that.
	He's actually an anti-globalist.
	And don't believe any of this stuff that people tell you about this MRA stuff being dangerous.
	It's just sugar water.
	He's playing 4D chess.
	So 40% of all the U.S. dollars created, ever created, were done in 2020.
	And Zero Hedge says, yes, that was the dollar.
	That was not Bitcoin, and that was not gold, they said.
	It was dollars that that happened to.
	Yes, Jamie, that's right.
	The excrement that you're so worried about, not Bitcoin.
	And it's why, after rising 4,000% since you first lashed out about it, we expect a similar return over the next seven years, at which point we're somewhat hopeful that you will finally understand why you were so wrong after all of these years.
	Well, again, as I said, you know, we look at this and look at the interest on the debt, and that was really what David Stockman was talking about in his book, the eye-popping interest payment on our national debt.
	As you have the Federal Reserve, we were warned by Lindbergh's father, who was a senator at the time and opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve.
	He said these people can create boom and bust cycles.
	It was sold by J.P. Morgan himself.
	As a way to stop these boom and bust cycles and another thing, we're going to bring stability to the market, and yet they did exactly the opposite.
	They used it to enrich themselves by creating boom and bust cycles.
	That's how they make money. They don't make money when everything goes sideways.
	They make money when it's going up and down, and they're the ones who are making it go up and down, just like Nancy Pelosi with the insider trading.
	But the Federal Reserve is the ultimate in insider trading.
	And, of course, the biggest banks, Are in on that as well, and they will be in on the CBDC as well.
	And so, again, we go back to 2020, and this massive $3.5 trillion bill that Trump wanted to do to placate the people that he'd just taken their businesses and jobs away from.
	And Thomas Massey was the only one who stood up to him.
	Thomas Massey said, no, we're going to have this vote in person.
	Come back and do this vote.
	And that was another way really to show that this whole thing was a bluff.
	And Trump got so angry at him, he said, we're going to primary him out, right?
	Fortunately, they didn't.
	But now we're at the position, after the debt began expanding, and, you know, it was Trump's war on capitalism, it was Trump's war on America, and, of course, as we have seen over and over again, you know, Barack Obama got us up to seven wars.
	He kept the wars that George W. Bush had started, and then he increased more little wars, and so by the time Trump came in, there were seven wars, and Trump kept all those as well.
	Obama kept Bush's wars and added to them.
	Trump kept all of Obama's wars.
	He didn't add any of them, but he kept them all.
	And Biden did the same thing.
	He got thrown out of Afghanistan, but these guys don't ever get rid of these wars, and they don't get rid of their war on America.
	They don't get rid of their war on capitalism, or let's just say free markets either.
	And so Biden has continued to expand this deficit by leaps and bounds.
	And so where are we right now?
	Well, to give you an idea of how, because we talk about trillions, it just doesn't mean anything to people because it's such an astronomical number.
	America's ballooning national debt, which currently stands at an astonishing $34 trillion.
	If you took the combined net worth, Take all the money from Elon Musk.
	Take all the money from Jeff Bezos.
	Take all the money from Mark Zuckerberg, from Bill Gates, from Ken Griffin, from Mark Cuban, from Ray Dalio and George Soros.
	Take all the money from all those guys I just mentioned.
	And that would total up $726 billion.
	Meanwhile, the interest on our national debt...
	That skyrocketed under both Trump and Biden, the two guys that are frontrunners in the presidential race.
	The interest is currently at $730.8 billion.
	So it's more.
	Take all those guys and take every penny from them, and that wouldn't even pay the interest on the debt for one year.
	This is how far into this fantasy financial crisis So, there was a massive 39% jump this last year from 2022 in the deficit.
	See, Biden is escalating the war.
	It's kind of like watching the Vietnam War.
	You know, JFK started the Vietnam War, and then you had Lyndon Johnson really escalate it, and then Nixon escalated it again.
	A massive 39% jump from 2022 when the government paid $475 billion in interest on the national debt.
	So not only has the debt gone up, but they've raised the interest rates significantly.
	So that's where we are.
	That's an interesting way to look at it.
	Look, folks, you know, Bitcoin has been a great investment, and a lot of people have made a lot of money.
	Some people have lost money on it.
	But it's a volatile thing.
	And it is also, at this stage of my life, I don't want something that can easily be robbed.
	And I say it.
	One of these billionaires, I forget which one of them it was now, I reported it when it happened.
	He was notified by somebody who was watching the big trades.
	Because, you see, Bitcoin is not private.
	Not private at all.
	There's other currencies like Monero and PirateCoin that are private.
	But the other cryptocurrencies are not private.
	And so this guy was watching the transactions and he said, there's a huge transaction, almost a million dollars.
	And he was able, by looking at public information, To see that it belonged to this billionaire.
	And he called him up and he says, is that you?
	Are you doing this? And why are you selling this massive amount of money?
	And the guy totally was unaware that that had happened.
	And so I looked at it and thought, well, what does that tell you about privacy?
	And what does that tell you about security?
	You know, tagline I put in there when I talk about Tony, money is what you hold.
	Money is something that's not encumbered with debt.
	Money is not something that is a phony construct of bankers like J.P. Morgan or the Federal Reserve bankers like Powell and the rest of them, Janet Yellen and all the rest of that.
	That stuff, that is the true South Sea bubble.
	That is the true tulip bubble.
	And the only question is, when is it going to burst?
	And then at the same time, when you look at things like Bitcoin and the privacy issue and the security issue, that is what concerns me.
	But again, I don't give people investment advice.
	I just tell them what I do and tell them where they can find gold and silver.
	And that is at davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Arderman.
	And Tony's not going to be with us today.
	Normally I would go to him at this point in time.
	But he's not going to be with us today.
	But you can get to wisewolf.gold by going to davidknight.gold.
	and we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Elvis. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the Oldies channel at APSradio.com Don't know much about history.
	Don't know much about Don't know much about a Cyrus book Don't know much about the French I took But I do know that I love you And I know that if you loved me too What a wonderful world this would be Yeah, I don't know much about Sam Cooke, but I do love his music.
	So let's talk a little bit about the people who don't know much about history or biology or geography or anything.
	They don't know much about anything, but they know what they love.
	I can't believe this is real science class at a real university.
	Yeah, that's coming from PJ Media and Campus Reform.
	Everybody's grabbing this story.
	This is actually coming out of Rice University.
	And this is a person who has a degree in chemistry, but she's doing this as part of the DEI at that university.
	And she's got a class...
	That is called Afrochemistry.
	Show that, Travis. And this guy says, what changes about chemistry with skin color?
	I don't mean the amount of or the type of melanin a person might have in their skin determining how dark or light-skinned they turn out to be.
	I'm talking about the actual atomic molecular structures that And the processes of chemistry, because those are totally different, you know, if you're black.
	And so in this course of Afrochemistry, the study of black life matter.
	And it's not different.
	And this handwritten flyer that she's got there, got little thought bubbles.
	What does it look like to do science on one's own terms?
	Well, it looks like Fauci, actually, is what it looks like.
	Because that's not science.
	What does justice look like in chemistry?
	Again, justice doesn't need an adjective.
	Justice is justice.
	It doesn't need social justice or chemistry justice, any of this nonsense.
	And so it is the study of black life matters.
	And this is not actually a joke from these people.
	Looks like they're being cutesy, but that's not even a joke.
	When I saw today that Afrochemistry was a thing, I thought back to 1986.
	Says the writer, and I couldn't remember learning about any racial aspects to chemistry, but being committed to bringing my readers even more uncomfortable truths, I did a little digging, and here's what I learned about eumelanin, one of the most common melanins and responsible for dark skin color.
	And then he's got a long technical paragraph.
	U-melanin has two forms linked to 5,6-dihydroxydol and 5,6-dihydroxydol to carbolic acid and on and on.
	So he says, well, I don't know.
	He says, are you still awake? He said, I nodded off out of boredom and bewilderment sometime around the oxidation of trirosine.
	He said, stuff like this is exactly why I had to cheat and charm my way into that seat that I didn't deserve.
	But he said, that's when I did a double take on this professor's position at Rice.
	It took a minute to sink in.
	But despite her doctorate in chemistry, she doesn't work at Rice's renowned chemistry department.
	She works at the university's DEI department.
	And she will instruct her undergrads who are expecting to pony up $78,278 for the privilege of attending during the 2022-23 academic year.
	Isn't that amazing? The amount of money?
	I wonder if she knows the Pythagorean theorem.
	She may be as empty-headed as the scarecrow.
	And if she's putting something together like this, I don't really care.
	What kind of degrees she got from some kind of charlatan who walked out from behind the curtain and handed her a sheepskin.
	They said they should have named her class Agitprop 101.
	Because he goes on to look at the flyer promoting it.
	You know, what does justice look like in chemistry and that type of thing?
	Yeah, even the hard sciences are falling.
	And, of course, math is there as well.
	I just see this comment that Travis put up there on Rockfin.
	Jen Jones says, Good news.
	The SEC announced a notice of withdrawal for that proposed rule that would have allowed the New York Stock Exchange to list natural asset companies.
	Big win. It is. Thank you for letting me know that.
	I didn't see that. Wow, that's great.
	Today was the day they were going to make the determination.
	So, excellent.
	That is a big win, and quite frankly, I can't believe it happened.
	But it is important, and it may be because a lot of people I wrote to them over this, and that's what I said when we were talking to Courtney about that.
	I've seen this happen.
	I've got to say, I'm just as surprised as when the small band of homeschoolers in North Carolina took on the Teachers Union in In a state where everything was controlled by the Democrats, both houses as well as the governorship, and they stopped the teachers union that was trying to outlaw homeschooling.
	They stopped them in their tracks with a letter-writing campaign.
	And so I think that's what it was.
	So that's great news. I expect that they will be back.
	I don't think they're going to take no for an answer.
	They'll adjust it and they'll come in a different way.
	But that is really, really good news.
	Thank you for passing that on, Jen.
	That's great news. So the natural asset companies...
	The big scam, which I looked at it and thought, well, this is just the extension as ESG is losing.
	And even the Wall Street Journal is saying, you know, everybody's got nothing but scorn now for ESG. It's been totally discredited.
	It's been exposed.
	That bubble has popped.
	And so they're looking at new things to do, and I thought they were going to jump into natural asset companies and make these structures before people caught on to that, but people caught on and stopped it.
	That's great. On Rumble, Ripper6720 says, mustn't avoid taxes because 50% of your 100% goes straight into the black hole of iniquity.
	I think 100% of it goes into the black hole of iniquity, quite frankly.
	But again, you have to pick the hill that you're going to die on.
	You know, there's good causes and there's different ways to fight these things and I can't get involved in each and every one of them.
	So, you know, I've...
	Anyway, Rockfin, Wes Robertson.
	When J.P. Morgan started his bank, the Rothschilds owned 87% of the shares and J.P. only 13%.
	Very shrewd guy. And, of course, he also, on the financial side, he and people like Edison really had their way with Nikolai Tesla.
	You know, just because somebody...
	There's different types of intelligence, right?
	I mean, there's people who can create useful products with their intelligence.
	There's people like Tesla.
	There's people like Isaac Newton.
	And then there's the people who exploit them, who steal their ideas and make lots and lots of money and take everything away from them.
	We have different types of intelligence, don't we?
	And we have a lot of different types of people.
	Take a look at this from Libs of TikTok.
	This is the CEO of United Airlines.
	A guy. A guy.
	A guy. A drag queen, wannabe.
	And United has turned their focus, says Libs of TikTok, to incorporating drag into their business and sponsoring drag shows.
	Yes, there they are. United Airlines proudly does drag for the first time ever for Pride Month.
	Three United Airlines flight attendants dressing up like women.
	Isn't it funny that, you know, when you see somebody in a dress now, you pretty much got to figure out that it's a drag queen.
	Yeah. Because unless they're older women, nobody wears dresses anymore, it seems like.
	Um... Outside of a few churches, if somebody's wearing a dress, you can bet it's a man.
	Because women wear pants now everywhere.
	It's Pride Weekend in Denver, and United is proud to sponsor various Denver Pride events this weekend.
	During past years, we've had large turnouts of United.
	Employees, friends, and families join us.
	That's a family thing. That's what it is right there.
	And it's not just that. Of course, he's also into the DEI stuff.
	He says in an interview, which I won't play for you, he takes race and gender into account when he hires and he laments that there's just too many white males like him in the airline industry.
	So get out. You know, help us all.
	He's going to hire people based on their skin color, based on their melanin, based on their afrochemistry or whatever they imagine their gender to be.
	This is the insanity that's there.
	It's just another reason, folks, not to fly.
	When you look at all this stuff, you look at the TSA. It's become Stasi Central.
	But Guard Goldsmith, hey Guard, thank you for the tip on Rockfin, and it's good to see you there.
	He says, it was thanks to you and people like Courtney that many of us heard about the NAC scam, the trade credits for not being punched by government fascism.
	Yeah. So, thank you, David.
	Well, I think her, she's the one who brought it to my attention.
	She's been a dynamo for liberty, like you, and a growing number of folks.
	Well, thank you, and thank you.
	I'm sure you spread the word as well on liberty conspiracy.
	And so, it's important.
	I mean, we have to have this network, and even though we're highly censored, we have to have this network of people who can spread the word.
	And that includes you telling people one-on-one, not just on social media, because social media, they try to control shadow ban and shut that down as well.
	So thank you, Guard.
	Good to see you there. Cocaine traces were found in Hunter Biden's gun pouch.
	And Politico is reporting that's what triggered these charges against him.
	I'm sure when they found that, they probably said, hey, kid, you're going to shoot your eye out.
	Maybe you're going to blow your head off with that blow.
	They don't mean using the gun either to blow his head off.
	I think he tried his best to do that.
	And so, yeah, it triggered the charges.
	That he is so indignant about.
	He really did do his best to show his contempt for Congress, literally, when he showed up.
	And then this headline from the BBC. Occasionally, you'll see headlines.
	It's difficult to do headlines.
	You've got only so much room to work with, and you're trying to abbreviate stuff, and I struggle with it.
	I don't have very good headlines.
	That's something that Alex really was a master at.
	He knows how to get attention, but I don't do a good job with headlines.
	And this person of the BBC is struggling with doing headlines as well in terms of perspicuity.
	Here's the headline.
	Kate in hospital after surgery as king to get prostate treatment.
	Maybe she can get a job as the United CEO with the...
	She's identifying as king, and as part of that, she's going to have prostate surgery.
	Of course, that's not what is happening there, but it certainly looked like it from the BBC. Just had to throw that in.
	I spend so much time looking for articles, and I see a headline like that, and I say, what?
	What? Because I'd already seen the other articles about what was happening with them.
	And it makes a difference to them, but quite frankly, it's, you know, I'm not interested in what's happening to the royal family.
	Maybe a personal tragedy for them, but again, I don't hang on what is happening with them as well.
	Sam Altman, the guy with...
	Chat GPT and open AI. And of course, he's positioning himself.
	He's young.
	He is going to be a real technocrat tyrant in the future.
	This guy is dangerous.
	Watch out for him.
	He's positioning himself with AI, with the Pentagon, all the rest of the stuff, and as a way to control speech.
	And of course, he's gone to Congress multiple times and said, you know, you need to work with people like me.
	These other people, AI is just too dangerous for anybody else to have it.
	You need to have two or three of us that are connected to you, and everybody else needs to be shut down.
	The same way that, you know, Jeff Bezos went to the government and said, yeah, we're going to be delivering stuff by drone.
	You know, you've seen the Klaus videos, I'm sure he said to them.
	You know, you've seen the videos where you'll own nothing and you'll go nowhere and the drones will deliver what you order and what you're allowed to have based on your social credit score.
	If you're okay with that and you haven't used too many carbon credits, we'll deliver what you just ordered to your doorstep with a drone.
	But only Amazon, right?
	You can't let the small businesses on Main Street use drones to deliver things.
	It's got to be a few big companies that are going to do this like mine.
	That's what these people always do.
	So that's what Sam Altman is doing.
	And so he's at Davos.
	And yesterday he had an interview with Axios.
	And he said, ChatGPT is going to evolve in ways that are uncomfortable.
	Uncomfortable. I thought, hmm, that's interesting.
	What does he mean by that?
	And it's very interesting what he said.
	He believes that the future AI products will need to allow, quote, quite a lot of individual customization, unquote.
	And that's going to make a lot of people uncomfortable.
	So he's not talking about killer robots.
	That make their own decision about who and when, what to kill.
	No, he's talking about the fact that he goes on to say, AI will give different answers to different users.
	Maybe it can get a job at Rice University teaching Afrochemistry.
	But that's what we're talking about here.
	We're talking about essentially putting, you know, the truth is whatever I believe.
	I got my truth, you've got your truth, and they're going to use artificial intelligence to enforce that.
	And when you stop and think about it, is that really maybe as dangerous in many ways as autonomous killer robots?
	Because, you know, the pen is mightier than the sword, and so is a lie, and so is a lie told to you by a machine that people are inclined to believe in.
	I mean, this is one of the things, as we began using computers when I was in college, one of the things that the professors were most adamant about debunking in our attitude was to make sure that we knew garbage in, garbage out.
	It's just a computer. Don't believe this because it's coming out of a computer.
	Don't believe it because it got spewed out in a printout.
	That doesn't make it true.
	If you've got garbage, if you've got lies, if you've got bad models that are going into it, don't believe it when Fauci comes to you and says, everybody's going to die, you've got to lock everything down.
	And so, but most people are not...
	Of that mindset. Most people are not taught that.
	Most people, especially people who are going to be growing up, are going to believe everything this AI tells them.
	And it's going to be giving different answers for different users based on their value preferences and possibly on what country they reside in.
	So, in other words, to unpack what he's saying here, This is going to be government propaganda and lies will be fed to you by artificial intelligence.
	And he'll be the one cooperating with the governments.
	He's just like Elon Musk.
	He will go to every government and give them what they want.
	And what they want is control of the narrative.
	They'll give different answers to different people in different countries.
	So, he said, might answer a question differently in a different country based on the country's values.
	The country's values. He means the government's values.
	Altman said, quote, it'll be different for users of different values.
	The country's issue, I think, is somewhat less important.
	So we're just going to skew this for your own DEI prejudices and ignorance and all the rest of this stuff.
	This is what they've been training the kids in school for.
	And if you're dumb enough to pay them $75,000 a year, To get fed propaganda, you're going to be dumb enough to believe whatever this thing says.
	Because perhaps they'll just change the number, the name.
	Maybe it won't be ChatGPT anymore.
	Maybe it'll be ChatPhD.
	Believe me, because I've got a PhD, this artificial intelligence.
	And that's the way people look at it.
	They'll think it's ChatPhD.
	And so it is Davos that is truly uncomfortable with debate.
	And he's there at Davos, and he's saying that.
	And understand that at Davos, the big issue is shutting down speech.
	That is the central thing at Davos.
	And so here's one of the Davos presenters talking about how uncomfortable she is with the fact that you and I can have debates...
	on social media that we can disagree with each other that we can disagree with the government that needs to be shut down on x she says now i wanted to come to the question of the social media i must say that i have abandoned twitter too so x because yeah it's a toxic environment and we talk about i have no solution on that but i think one day it will come the moment Of the code of conduct in this place.
	Because journalists, if you spread crazy news and insults, and if a journalist says racist things, it can be amended.
	Why social medias that have such big power?
	Because it's new, but I think there will be a social reflection on how information is brought there.
	Of course, on X, now there is also the policy of the owner that is problematic, but I think this is...
	Yeah, free speech.
	Yeah, it is the policy of the owner to have free speech, except, you know, not for everybody.
	Like I said before, it's not any better for me than it was before.
	But, again, that is the central thing for them that they're talking about at Davos.
	How do they...
	Control your information that you see, what you have to say, and how do they push their disinformation?
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen...
	This is the President of the EU. Your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate, It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our societies.
	These risks...
	Everybody must be homogenized under them, right?
	And I talked to her at the very beginning of that, but just listen to the way she began her address there.
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, dear Klaus...
	Klaus. So excellencies.
	And then ladies and gentlemen.
	And then there's Klaus. He doesn't belong to any of those.
	Isn't he an excellency?
	Is he a lady or a gentleman?
	What is he identifying with?
	Maybe he's already made the transition to being a cyborg or something.
	Another class by himself.
	Now what they're very afraid of is the fact that we might be polarized.
	We might have different groups and we might have different nations and different cultures and Different understandings.
	This is coming from the same people who just told you, well, everybody's going to have their own truth, right?
	And in a different country, depending on the political leaders are that we're working with, we'll give you different answers.
	So at the same time, they say they don't want to have any polarization or dissent.
	That's what we would call it.
	They want to make sure that everybody gets the same thing, which is them as rulers, right?
	So, how is this for uncomfortable?
	I just want to show this one thing here, and I don't know what this lady is doing.
	She's giving them a blessing there.
	This is a pagan thing.
	This is how they began one of these forums or the main meeting.
	She's got her face all covered there, and she's chanting something in a foreign language.
	I don't know what demons she's summoning or anything.
	Rubbing her hands together. And she's got her eyes closed.
	She's doing some kind of pagan prayer.
	Now she blows on her hand and blows in the different directions.
	Now watch this. She's going to go to each one of these people sitting on their chairs.
	And she's going to blow in their face.
	These are the people who are freaking out about face masks for the last three years.
	And she's going to spit and blow in their face.
	Look at this. Yeah, how's that for uncomfortable?
	It's not just the chat PhD.
	It is, she goes from one person to the other.
	Here we go. We get to see what she's like now.
	Oh, she's blowing on their forehead.
	And of course, that can't get you sick, right?
	And then we have YouTube.
	Accused of throttling CPU performance for users who have Adblock installed.
	And, of course, I have something here that I got this morning from Jason Barker.
	I don't know if Jason is online or not.
	He's having a lot of problems being canceled by Google.
	But before I tell you about Jason, this particular thing, It has been identified by a lot of different people.
	As if the noticeably longer ads on YouTube weren't unbearable enough, the streaming video platform is now also in the spotlight due to slowing down PCs for users that have Adblock installed.
	That was the topic of a new PCGamer.com article which noted that, quote, Adblock users have been reporting widespread performance issues with the extension enabled on YouTube.
	A thread on the YouTube subreddit detailed that adblock enabling would cause slow load times and would increase CPU usage when on YouTube.
	This messes up the resources on the computer as a whole.
	It just kills Chrome, it seems, one person wrote.
	So again, Google has set up Chrome, and Chrome is the basis for a lot of different browsers that are out there, people building on top of Chrome.
	And then, of course, Google, you know, the Chrome browser, Google with YouTube.
	Well, they decided that they were going to do something.
	Who knows what they're doing?
	Just, you know, making the CPU. I don't know.
	Are they mining crypto?
	Not telling people.
	I don't know what they're doing. But the author who wrote this tested the issue himself.
	He said his CPU usage rose about 17% when he turned on Adblock and went to YouTube.
	While not a catastrophic increase in processor use, the author did note that lower-end laptops, mainly used for browsing, could start having heat problems.
	Maybe that's your issue, Travis.
	The issue also affects YouTube premium subscribers.
	So even if you pay YouTube a monthly fee so that you don't have the ads, if you have Adblock on because you're going to other sites and you don't want to see the ads on those other sites, even if you're paying YouTube premium prices and you've got Adblocker turned on for these other sites, it'll do the same thing to you.
	It'll use about 20% of your CPU. Really ramp it up.
	And that's pretty significant. That is really significant for one app to do that.
	One user mentioned that their laptop's unusually high activity, while another user suspected storage issues.
	Another one observed a 15% to 18% performance drop when using the extension, even though they had paid for YouTube Premium.
	And so Jason Barker sent this to me and said, I have been canceled by Google.
	He says, I can't even bring up the simple search page on any device using my router.
	This came yesterday out of nowhere.
	It seems like a no-big-deal situation, but then it actually has really thrown a wrench into everything we do online.
	I've done hours of troubleshooting, and I believe that the MAC address of my router has been blocked.
	That's the... Each computer has a unique identifier, the MAC, and that's one of the ways that they can identify, you know, who you are.
	As you know, he says, I have an extensive background in communications.
	From my first six years in the Army and the following five years as lead guy for the civilian ISP, serving 70,000 customers on military bases in Okinawa.
	They have blocked the MAC address of my router.
	I have proof of this through my troubleshooting.
	There is no doubt that my home has been targeted for the purpose of silencing me.
	There are far-reaching implications to this.
	I can still use a few search sites and find what I need for research.
	But there are Google Ads that are embedded which make them take a long time to load or even time out.
	At first, I thought it was a problem with my ISP, but I've determined that's not the case.
	I see this as a reflection of things to come.
	If Google can almost shut me down on its own, then what do you think will happen when we're all using CBDC? Any one major stakeholder can interrupt your life in a very significant way.
	I mean, we had, like I said, a speaker where the podcast goes out.
	And the podcast is where most people hear this program.
	We had a complaint that was filed.
	It seemed very much like a complaint has been filed against you on YouTube, and we have taken down your site.
	Won't tell me what it's about.
	And it was a single complaint, and that's what happened in 2018.
	But, you know, with the podcast, and this just happened at the beginning of December, they said, a complaint has been filed, and we have marked, they've complained that your podcast is spam.
	And I had that podcast for six years.
	And it has, I don't know, between 4 and 5 million downloads over that period of time.
	And they just decided, somebody told them that it was spam, and they just took it down.
	And it took a couple of days to get them to put it back up again.
	And then when it got reactivated again, I didn't realize it, but they had blocked, even though it got reactivated, they had blocked all the places that it was being pushed out to.
	It truly is amazing.
	You know, these people... You know, who is it that has that kind of clout that they can call up Spreaker, which is under iHeart, and tell them to take down a podcast?
	And they do it just like that.
	Well, you know who that is.
	The government has that kind of clout.
	So, what is it that I had said?
	Well, I said that this...
	We started talking about the...
	The epidemiological study at the beginning of December, about 17 million people worldwide being killed by the Trump shots.
	I said it's simply murder. And that was in the title.
	I didn't hide it. And so they immediately took it down.
	So I don't know what subject Jason touched on that did that.
	But that's why you see so many people...
	And the alternative media, and they'll say, well, you know, I don't know what to say about this, and, you know, what do you think about this?
	Look at this, and what do you think?
	They can put that stuff up, and it doesn't trigger the censorship, and they know it.
	That's one way to get the information out.
	I just like to be a little bit more direct.
	So he says, I'm hoping this is just an IP block and maybe the MAC address of my modem.
	Since the IP renews, it may work itself out.
	I don't think this is the case, though, because I logged in the modem and told it to release and to renew to no avail.
	I guess we'll see what happens in the next few days.
	But as for now, my research ability is limited since most sites use Google on the back end.
	So, again, that's the way that they're going to lock us down.
	I hope that has not happened to Jason, but we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, yeah, we put that in as part of the Christmas stuff, and I started thinking about it.
	I thought, you know, it's all about snow and everything.
	There's nothing even in the minimal lyrics there about anything Christmas.
	So, yeah, it's a fair game.
	We can play that right now while everybody is snowed in, and we've been snowed in for several days now.
	Where we are, our driveway is straight up and it's covered with snow and some ice and so we aren't going anywhere for a while because I'm not predicting the temperature to get up above freezing for a few more days.
	As we're talking about the censorship, they've taken an interesting approach in Italy.
	And, you know, I was just looking at Breitbart and they were talking about their populist heroes.
	And so, again, Donald Trump, Javier Malay.
	And again, you know, I'm still uncertain about where this guy is.
	I mean, his antics as well as, you know, some of the things in his personal life really concern me because I think character matters.
	But anyway, Trump, Javier Malay, and they put in Maloney.
	I call her baloney because she fed everybody there a bunch of baloney.
	She ran, just like Trump did, as a nationalist who's going to do something about the border.
	And she's going to protect that.
	The country's being overrun.
	As I pointed out many times, for example, that one island where they had 6,000 people, Italians, who lived there.
	And then over just a couple of weeks, they bring in 18,000 migrants.
	They're illegally, um...
	Young men of military age who have no income, no wealth, and no place to live.
	And what's that going to do to that island?
	Karen's brother, one half of their family is Italian.
	And when he was in college, he went to Italy to study for a while.
	He speaks Italian. He was talking to people who live in Italy.
	And they said, oh, the place is...
	You know, he's thinking about going back there, maybe staying for a year or two.
	But... And he may still be thinking about it, but he talked to somebody and they said, that's beautiful, but you won't believe what's happened with the migrants coming in.
	I don't know what part of Italy they were in.
	It wasn't necessarily that island.
	And so Maloney has been a complete traitor.
	She has absolutely done nothing.
	She goes to the Davos meetings and stuff like that.
	Of course, Trump went to the Davos meetings as well.
	But, you know, if it's somebody that talks about being anti-globalist, Breitbart and others will tell you that they're on our side.
	Don't worry about what they do.
	They're really on our side. You know, they do the same thing that Alex does.
	Yeah, Maloney may keep the borders open and she may be chummy with Klaus Schwab, but she's on our side.
	She really is. You've got to believe that.
	And so in Italy now, popular social media accounts are going to be treated as publishers.
	Now, when they're talking about influencers, they're talking about somebody whose followers exceed one million, and they're now going to legally consider them as producers of audio-visual content.
	Putting on the same legal footing as publishers, and that means they get big fines and they get extra scrutiny and that type of thing.
	But understand that even though a million is a lot, and I'm sure that I'll never see that, shadow banning, I was capped about six years ago, I haven't moved an inch.
	And that's on Twitter, the free speech platform as well.
	But I'm sure that they will adjust that number down.
	At a later date. And so where's all this coming from?
	Well, they always have to have an excuse for what is behind this.
	And so...
	I don't know if you've ever had pentatoni bread.
	It used to be kind of esoteric a few decades ago, but now it's everywhere.
	And you'll see that in a lot of different places.
	It's a holiday bread that comes from Italy.
	It's kind of a really light version, I think, of it as a very light version, better tasting version of the real heavy bread.
	Fruitcakes that we have here.
	You know, they're dense.
	This is very lightweight.
	And so, panettone bread came from Milan.
	And then there's another kind of bread or cake that came from Verona that's very similar to it called a Pandoro cake.
	And so, there was a bakery that was selling these and an influencer who said, if you buy these Pandoro cakes...
	We will give money to charity for it.
	And I don't know. It's part of a holiday cake charity event.
	And I don't know what percentage they said they were going to give.
	Turns out they raised over a million dollars and they gave about $54,000 to the charity, which is about a 5% of what they raised to the charity.
	Bottom line is, that's right where Southern Poverty Law Center is.
	You know, the money that they take in, I've reported on this in the past, only about 5% actually goes to legal fees that the leftists and communists who support them would approve of.
	The rest of it they keep and they send to their offshore bank accounts.
	Hundreds of millions of dollars, the Southern Poverty Law Center does.
	And so, you know, 5% to charity.
	Again, even if we look at the Clinton charities, right?
	The Clinton Foundation. I would not be surprised if they operate about that way, with giving out 5% of the money, if they even give out that much, and keeping the rest of it.
	So they did donate some money, but they're saying that it was fraudulent because they didn't do enough.
	And so now they're saying that because of this, they need to treat influencers on social media as if they were publishers.
	The new classification increases the legal and reputational hazards that influencers face when publishing material.
	Everything always goes back to censorship, doesn't it?
	It always goes straight back to that.
	And with any kind of justification that they can find to do censorship.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about power.
	As it's not just Texas now.
	But more of these providers of power to the grid were actually grid gremlins deconstructing the place and taking everything down.
	And so this is about the TVA, and we'll talk about that when we come back.
	If you like the Eagles, on a dark desert highway, the cars, and Healy Lewis and the News, they say the heart of rock.
	You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APS radio.com Using free speech to free minds me.
	you It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, more and more grid trouble.
	We now have the Tennessee Valley Authority, and it is the largest public power grid supplier to Tennessee, northern Alabama, northeastern Mississippi, southwestern Kentucky, and portions of northern Georgia, western North Carolina, and southwestern Virginia.
	And, of course, it's here, and they're asking people to pull back and conserve their power usage because, again, they have been moving to renewable energy.
	And here in this area, they had a big issue because they wanted to use these sources of energy, solar and wind, for the grid that are not consistent.
	So they want to buy these massive battery energy storage systems, BESS, from Elon and big fire hazards, basically, and extremely expensive.
	And so this is a kind of woke power grid that we see here, not just in Texas, but also at the TVA.
	Besides TVA, Texas's power grid, the ERCOT, has been under pressure this week.
	So far spared from collapse. However, a new Bank of America report says that grid instabilities are here to stay.
	And in the next five years, we're going to see brownouts in major U.S. cities.
	That's the magnitude of what is unfolding.
	Now, Bank of America knows this because Bank of America is part of this Green Agenda scam.
	To shut down reliable and more energy-efficient and cheaper sources of energy and to put up these unreliable things and charge us massive amounts of money.
	Jim Jordan is demanding answers after the Biden administration was caught flagging certain terms like MAGA and Trump to track political opponents' financial transactions.
	And it's not just that.
	But we talked just yesterday about how the New York State and the New York State Attorney General put pressure on banks and then put pressure on the ISO to create a code to identify stores that sold guns and ammunition and that type of thing.
	And this is now being done with buying Bibles.
	Not just shopping at sporting goods places.
	The people are having their transactions flagged.
	And of course, they're having a hearing on this.
	Jim Jordan, Chairman of the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government.
	How much more does he need to know?
	Why don't you write some legislation, Jim, instead of holding dog and pony hearings forever and ever and ever?
	Jim's not going to do anything.
	Jim Jordan and the Congress, the Republicans, are not going to do a thing about any of this stuff.
	How do you stop it?
	Well, just like I was talking about with that code that was being put on credit card purchases.
	You stop it by doing it at the state level.
	And we've already had about a half dozen states that have said you can't do that for the guns and the ammunition thing.
	And they've prohibited that at the state level.
	You've got another three or four, including Tennessee, where they've introduced legislation to prohibit that as well.
	And if you want to stop them from flagging things because it's, you know, people are buying Bibles there or because of MAGA or because of Trump, understand, as I've said for the longest time, geospatial intelligence, the fastest growing part of the intelligence community going back to the 1990s, and that was always, always about identifying people's political and religious beliefs, tracking them.
	You know, we saw this happen with the geofencing thing many times, most famous episode of that was around January the 6th.
	But again, if you want to stop this stuff, forget about Washington and focus on local elections.
	And I also talk about the local election of sheriffs.
	And I had somebody who said, well, take a look at this letter from the National Sheriff's Association.
	It's got about 3,600 sheriffs writing this.
	support of civil asset forfeiture. And again, understand that the vast majority of politicians are crooks and the vast majority of sheriffs and deputies and police officers are crooks as well. But you know, there's going to be some honest ones out there and that's who we want to try to focus and identify and uplift.
	But let's talk a little bit about the civil asset thing because we got yet another article and I see it as a positive sign that it's now not just Reason magazine that is writing about this.
	This has been a concern for a very long time of libertarians, but now it's out there with conservatives.
	And so WND has an article about this.
	Cops illegally grab a man's life savings, and now the victim turns the tables.
	And I think one of the reasons why you typically see these articles only in Reason is It's because conservatives don't want to criticize the police even when they do the wrong thing.
	That's not the approach of Frank Serpico, for example.
	If you remember that movie, based on a true story, Al Pacino did Serpico.
	He was an honest cop.
	He just wanted to do cop work and protect people on the street and walk the beat and that type of thing.
	But they demanded, they offered him...
	A take to be in on the drug business there.
	They were on the take and looking the other way and letting these people continue with their trade.
	He said, I don't want the money.
	They demanded that he take the money.
	Because if he didn't take the money, he was a threat.
	He had to get dirty as well.
	And this is what you see all the time with the Jeffrey Epstein stuff.
	There's a side to that with the politicians with all the sexual stuff and financial crimes and bribery.
	They want everybody dirty up there.
	And so, because he wouldn't take it, they nearly killed him.
	And he wound up writing a book about it, going to Switzerland.
	But he would come back and he'd say, you know, the police are like any other human institution.
	You're going to have good people and you're going to have bad people.
	The question is, are you going to purge the bad people?
	Or is the institution going to defend them?
	If the institution, if the police departments defend the bad people, then they themselves are corrupted by that.
	And, of course, it's not just Serpico, but it's also Adrian Schoolcraft, which I've talked about in New York as well, but I won't go into his story.
	In this particular case, officers pulled this guy over.
	They never alleged that he did anything wrong, but because he had cash, and think about that.
	Think about that. He was guilty because he had cash.
	And so because he had cash, that must mean that he is involved in some kind of criminal activity.
	Same kind of thing that Jamie Dimon was just talking about, right?
	Jamie Dimon. Got it wrong there, yeah.
	If you got Bitcoin, obviously, you're involved in some kind of a crime.
	Maybe, you know, fraud...
	Sex trafficking, stuff like that.
	Well, maybe, you know, by the same logic, maybe if you've got your money in J.P. Morgan Bank, maybe you're involved in that as well, even in a passive way because the bank itself is involved in that.
	So if you've got your money there, you may be involved in that, even if you don't know it.
	Just like we're talking about taxes.
	You pay taxes to the government.
	They're going to use it for criminal ventures and wars and things like that.
	So the fight over various local, state, and federal forfeiture programs.
	I love the fact that they use that euphemism, forfeiture.
	It's just theft. It's theft.
	You're not forfeiting anything.
	They're taking it from you with the threat of force.
	Were cops or were government bureaucrats simply take a person's assets or cash?
	That's been going on for many years now.
	Many, many years. I started reporting on this back in the 90s.
	That's why when Megyn Kelly went to Infowars, she wanted to interview everybody, and we started talking about stuff.
	I mentioned civil asset forfeiture along the lines of, you know, Jeff Sessions and stuff like that.
	And she, what is that?
	She said. She just paid $25 million a year at Fox.
	She doesn't know what's civil asset for.
	And she's a lawyer to boot.
	She doesn't know what's civil asset for.
	And she doesn't care. After I explained it to her, her reaction wasn't like, that's horrible.
	That's got to stop. Nah, she didn't care.
	So, Highway Patrol officers simply take the money when they find that travelers have it.
	So the Institute of Justice is defending this guy.
	His name is Stephen Lara.
	And he's already won the battle as the DEA that had confiscated his life savings returned the money the day after he filed a lawsuit.
	But now he's going after the procedures in Nevada where this happened.
	He's going after the officers who stole it.
	They stole his backpack filled with money. The latest action in this case is that the second judicial district court for the state of Nevada denied the state's motion to dismiss the complaint by the Marine veteran.
	That means that Stephen Laura, represented by the Institute of Justice, can continue his legal challenge to the state's forfeiture scheme, which allows for police to take people's property without even showing that they committed a crime.
	They don't have to charge you, let alone find you guilty, to steal this stuff.
	A major first step towards justice for him and for all victims of unjust civil forfeiture laws.
	And again, they're not really laws.
	They're rules. And they make this phony distinction.
	They say, well, if this is a law that you violated that was passed by Congress or your elected representatives, then we would have to charge you, find you guilty before we take the stuff.
	But this is a rule, a rule created by the bureaucracy.
	It could be the IRS. As a matter of fact, that's where this all started, was with the IRS. The IRS would take people's money, as you probably know somebody, or maybe it's happened to you, say, well, we think you owe us more money.
	Prove that you don't. So they don't charge you with something.
	They don't take you to trial and prove that you didn't pay the money.
	You have to prove that you didn't do it, and they can take it first.
	And so that is now being done by all these different bureaucracies, but especially by people on interactions with the police, highway patrol, on streets in the name of the war on drugs.
	It's actually a war of drugs, a war against us.
	But anyway, they call it civil because it's a rule coming from the bureaucracy.
	And they call it forfeiture because they don't want to call it what it is, which is theft.
	If the government wants to take your money or your property, you should first have to prove that you did something wrong.
	So they said the officers who pulled him over never alleged that he did anything wrong.
	And he cooperated throughout the ordeal.
	However, using civil forfeiture, the officers were able to detain him for more than an hour and to take his life savings from him.
	They left him penniless on the side of the highway without any money to even buy gas to continue his trip.
	And then the Nevada Highway Patrol sent the money to the DEA under what they call equitable sharing.
	That's the name of this theft program.
	With the expectation that the DEA would circumvent Nevada law to forfeit the money using more government-friendly federal law and then kick back the lion's share for the Nevada Highway Patrol to use however it wanted.
	Yeah, it's a shameful little game where they might take 20% and kick 80% of it back to the law enforcement people.
	This is, you know, under this failed prohibition.
	Prohibition always turns into a criminal enterprise where it corrupts the police, it corrupts the courts, it makes more concentrated forms of whatever it is that you're trying to prohibit, whether it is alcohol or marijuana or any other drug.
	And they explain Stephen Lord did everything right.
	He served his country in the Marines for over 16 years, including tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.
	He's devoted to his two daughters, has been saving to buy a house where they can live with him, but his plans came crashing down in the winter of 2021 when the Highway Patrol seized his life savings.
	The officers knew they had no evidence of any crime, but they took his money anyway and gave it to the USDA in anticipation that they would kick it back to them.
	This reminds me of Lysander Spooner.
	He was around the time of the American Civil War.
	Interesting character in many different ways.
	He went into competition with the post office, and he was so affected in terms of competing with the post office, which was jacking up prices very rapidly, that they had to pass a law to prohibit private people from carrying mail to stop Lysander Spooner from essentially putting the post office out of business in his area.
	But he was also a hardcore abolitionist.
	But after what Lincoln did, and after Lincoln invaded the South and all the rest of the stuff, he said he opposed the Civil War.
	So he's right about a lot of things.
	He was a hardcore atheist, however.
	But in terms of, you know, the political issues, he was spot on.
	One of the things that he said, he said the difference between government and a highway robber.
	Is that highway robber will steal your cash and leave you on the side of the road, and the government will steal your cash and then follow you down the road, nagging you about it.
	But this guy, after they took all of his cash, he couldn't go anywhere.
	He was basically stuck.
	So I say that.
	That was something that came up.
	And then I also got this letter.
	And this is from John, a listener.
	He said, I listen to you often.
	Support what you do by buying gold and silver in your name through Tony.
	You state often how the bigger fight is local and to support the sheriffs that are more accountable to us.
	I've attached a letter from 3,086 sheriffs that are part of the National Sheriff Association, which is representative of all but a handful of sheriffs in the U.S. And they sent this letter to eyepatch John McCain, Dan Crenshaw in other words, and telling him not to support this law, H.R. 1525, which would aim to curtail some of the authority that the government pretends they have in civil asset forfeiture.
	In other words, the supposed law enforcement of the people wish to continue to steal from the people and have no accountability for it.
	He says, if you already addressed this, and I missed it, I appreciate it.
	Well, again, you know, we have, that is the majority opinion.
	And I just have to say, as I said before, you know, just having local political officials doesn't mean that they're any better than the federal people.
	It just means that you have more input into the process, right?
	Right. Rather than being one out of 750,000 people to vote for a congressional representative, or instead of being one out of 330 or whatever million people to vote for president, you're going to be one out of 10,000 or something to vote for your local officials.
	Maybe lower, depending on where you are.
	You might be one out of a few hundred.
	Whether you're talking about a school board, or you're talking about a town council, or you're talking about the sheriff or something like that.
	And so, that's my point in terms of local.
	That doesn't mean that you're going to have honest people of good character.
	There may not be anybody like that that's running an office.
	What I'm just saying is that you want to focus your efforts where you're going to have the most influence.
	So you can be one out of 330 million votes, you can be one out of 750,000 votes, or you can be one out of a few thousand votes for a state representative or a state senator, or you might be one out of a couple hundred votes for your local town council, or maybe even for the sheriff, depending on the size of your county, that type of thing.
	So you have an opportunity to do something right.
	But it doesn't guarantee, any more than carrying a gun is going to guarantee that you're going to come out on top.
	The gun will maybe level things for you with somebody who's going to attack, especially if you're a female or you're elderly and somebody's coming after you that's bigger than you physically.
	But, you know, if there's no guarantee that you're going to win, somebody can surprise attack you, somebody can start shooting first, you know, you may not be the only person who has a gun.
	So it doesn't guarantee that you're going to be protected, but it's something that you do to try to protect yourself.
	And that's what I talk about. When I'm talking about local officials, it's not a guarantee that you're going to get the right thing, but it's where you're going to have the most effect is in participating in this locally.
	And so this letter that he sent truly is disgusting, coming from the National Sheriff's Association.
	And again, there's different associations.
	This is very big, over 3,000, almost 3,100 sheriff's associations.
	Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers of America, that's Sheriff Mack's organization, and that's much smaller, and they stress following the Constitution, that type of thing.
	But, you know, somebody could be a member of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, and they might decide that they're not going to follow the law.
	There's no guarantee about that.
	But again, if you've got somebody who is aware of that, somebody who has said that they're going to do that, it's a good starting point.
	A good starting point to take their talking points to the local sheriff in election and ask him to give his opinion about some of these questions that they have in a questionnaire for a sheriff.
	But again, 3,100 people in this National Sheriff's Association.
	This is a letter that they wrote to Crenshaw, which I guess he made public.
	Because maybe he's trying to justify the fact that he wants to continue to steal money from people who have done nothing wrong, who've not been found guilty, who've not even been charged with a crime.
	It's called the FAIR Act, and nothing could be more unfair.
	It would largely say the sheriffs that would largely dismantle a crucial tool.
	I'm sorry, the FAIR Act is to control.
	So, yeah, maybe that's why they called it that.
	So, it would largely dismantle a crucial tool in the fight against Mexican drug cartels.
	And that is, they said, federal civil asset forfeiture.
	It doesn't have anything to do with Mexican drug cartels.
	You know, when you look at this, did they shut down El Chapo that way?
	No. And so they said the public rightly demands more federal, state, and local cooperation.
	I don't. I don't want to have more consolidation of government.
	I want to have things decentralized.
	And so the people who created this government, this country, they understood the danger of consolidation and centralized control.
	Repealing equitable sharing, that's what we just talked about.
	They steal the money from somebody, they send it to the DEA, and the DEA gives them a kickback of about 80% or whatever of it, and keeps the other part.
	Partners in Crime.
	Repealing that, they said, will not promote civil rights.
	Well, that's an absolute lie.
	Because civil rights are being violated, and the Constitution is being violated, and their oath is being violated.
	They said it will not protect property owners.
	Well, it will if you stop people from stealing from them.
	But it would be a big victory for the drug lords and for other organized crime.
	You see how they play this game?
	It's a political game. You know, you got a criminal operation here.
	And, you know, don't vote for, you know, I'm going to be here to save you from Biden.
	Or we're going to steal people's property at will to protect them from drug lords.
	Government is a protection racket.
	And it is a racket.
	It really is a racket.
	So, I said the fact finder, they go and try to make an argument for how well this works.
	And how it is a real honest process.
	And so what they do is they'll steal this stuff and then they'll give it to a fact finder to arbitrate over this.
	Does that sound like what's defined in our rule of law?
	Where's the jury? Where's the judge?
	None of that. Where's the advocate?
	Where are you allowed to question your accusers?
	Where do they charge you with a crime?
	Instead, they take the property and And then over a period of time, they take it to somebody they call a fact finder, not a judge or jury.
	The fact finder is free to decide which evidence is credible and what testimony, documents, video, and other evidence add up to the greater weight in each case.
	But you're not going to have an advocate.
	You're not going to have a lawyer there. It's going to be a fact finder who's going to go down and guess what they do?
	They rubber stamp this as well.
	This allows for a nuanced review of the evidence, and it is fair, they said.
	Most civil proceedings, and this part is true, and this should really scare you, in defense of this government-organized criminal theft they call civil asset forfeiture, they say most civil proceedings use this standard, including ones that are used by Child Protective Services.
	Including those that are used for property valuation in eminent domain.
	So if they want to confiscate your children, or they want to take your property, you don't get any due process with that either.
	So let's just give this to the highway patrol, let them do whatever they want.
	And it's also not there in tax disputes.
	And of course, this is a pattern of tyranny.
	And when they say in terms of tax disputes, this is where this all really originated.
	You know, the IRS, they could take your stuff, and then you have to prove that you're innocent.
	Where do you prove it? Do you prove it in a real court?
	No, you prove it in one of their tax courts, where they are the fact finder.
	And so this is why this is such an important thing.
	You know, I get people accuse me of being, you know, defending a sheriff.
	People accuse me, had some guy accuse me a few months ago on here.
	Well, I'm done with you.
	I used to like you, but I see that you just really hate the cops.
	It's like, no, I hate dishonest cops, and I don't think dishonest cops...
	Should be protected by the system, because the system then becomes corrupted.
	I don't have a beef with cops, per se.
	I have a beef with cops that are dishonest.
	And so, again, just like Alex asked me, so what are we going to do about Trump if he becomes president?
	I say, if he does the right thing, we support him.
	If he does the wrong thing, we support him.
	Criticize him. Attack him, if you will.
	He didn't like that.
	And people don't like that when I apply that same standard to the cops.
	So, again...
	As I was pointing out as we got shut down, before we go to break, and we're going to take a quick break and come right back, please like the stream.
	That helps its visibility, and it really did take a chunk out of us when they shut us down in December.
	And so that's really been a big issue for us.
	So I appreciate your help.
	If you do that, it doesn't cost you anything.
	If you like the stream, if you pass it forward to other people, if you tell other people about it, perhaps they'll like it as well.
	They may get upset if I talk about their pet hobby horse.
	But again, you can disagree with me or agree with me, but I'll try to give you my honest opinion.
	And that should be worth something.
	We'll be right back. Looking for better information?
	APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
	at KCSRadioNews.com.
	♪♪
	Liberty. It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, you know, as we look at the character of our leaders, or the lack of it, there's a lot of different ways that the things that have happened over the last four years that are still around and still have repercussions that are vibrating throughout our society as part of the new normal.
	There's a lot of different ways that that has affected us.
	And so I want to talk about some other aspects of the lockdown, which, again, you know, when you heard that back and forth with Luke Grodowski and Tim Pool and Laura Loomer, they're jumping around all these different things.
	All the stuff that happened in 2020, the lockdown, the social distancing, the masks, non-essential people, and all the rest of the stuff, that was all Trump.
	And, of course, that war on us was continued, but it had a lot of different effects on different aspects of our life, on our getting together in church, on being able to have jobs, traveling, going to school, all these different things.
	One of the consistent supporters that we have here, Sue, sent me a card.
	Thank you, Sue, for the card, and thank you for the note she put here.
	She said, something my pastor said the other day, Rings so true to me.
	She said, when people talk about how much they love this world, you can say to them, this is your world, not my world.
	I'm just passing through.
	My world is with God in heaven.
	So she says, I was talking to my pastor about how I thought that maybe God had allowed this whole COVID pandemic, quote-unquote, to happen to show us how awful this world truly is, with all of its beauty, and to look toward heaven and to rekindle a close relationship to him.
	That's when he made the statement about just passing through this world.
	And so, you know, when I look at that, I think about that as well.
	Robert E. Lee said he had lost so many friends in the war.
	He had lost children in the war.
	Then after the war, even though he was widely respected north and south, and people were coming to him for product endorsements, he didn't do it.
	He still had a lot of people, politicians, wanting to lock him up.
	Oh yeah, because he was an insurrectionist, you know.
	And he said, after his wife died, he said, one by one, God removes the things that tie us to this earth.
	And I think that is true.
	And yet, when you look at the aftermath of all of this stuff, and it was very, as I said earlier in the week, it was very disturbing, I said on Tuesday, to see how these people who are Christians...
	And should not be looking for a savior in politics or a political party that's going to save them.
	That's exactly what they did.
	The MAGA pastors in Iowa, they all echoed the stolen election thing.
	And again, you heard Tim Poole say, well, stop talking to me about things that happened four years ago.
	Well, you know, the election thing is really pretty important to you that happened four years ago, but that whole thing about stealing people's lives and killing people and creating poison, that doesn't really matter to you.
	It's all just about politics, isn't it, Tim?
	Faith leaders who've endorsed Trump include hundreds of traditional conservatives and Many of them echo the claim that the 2020 election was stolen, and that includes the false prophets who kept saying, well, no, Trump's going to win, and he's going to be reinstalled.
	And they kept doing it over and over again.
	And people like Michael Flynn, who was pushing the LGBT transgenderism stuff on a Navy SEAL, who is now...
	He says, I'm an adult and they did this stuff to me.
	Well, it was Michael Flynn and people like him who were pushing that.
	And yet now he's reinvented himself as a leader of a Christian nationalist movement.
	No. Preachers who are popular on social media, like Greg Locke and others, have touted Trump, as does North Carolina Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson, who's got a large religious following.
	They don't care about abortion.
	They don't care about the church lockdowns.
	They don't care about digital ID tyranny.
	They don't care about universal basic income and enslavement.
	And they don't care about mass murder.
	Trump's sons, Don Jr.
	and Eric, along with Eric's wife, Laura, have spoken at rallies with Reawaken America Tour, the Flynn thing.
	You have all these pastors who would have been laughed out of the room 20 years ago, said Matt Taylor.
	He says it's a tectonic shift in power.
	And again, that's what a lot of these churches represent to these people, power.
	Economic power. Power of having a lot of followers.
	But not the power of God, right?
	You know, God's power, God's weapons, God's tools, God's ways are powerful in ways that these people don't understand.
	Because they're of this world.
	And all they will ever get is they'll settle for the things that are in this world.
	You've got people like Paula White, you know, the key spiritual advisor to Trump.
	Like Trump, she's on her third marriage.
	And like Trump, she's all about prosperity, which is not good news at all.
	It's not a prosperity gospel.
	There's no good news in collecting money in this world.
	It's all going to disappear.
	But he's connecting, as they point out, with a different kind of evangelical voter.
	And of course, this is a label thing.
	The people apply to themselves, and so many people identify with that, but, you know, a couple months ago I had George Barna on, who has always kind of kept tabs on What's happening with Christians and, you know, what do they believe and, you know, what are they doing in their life?
	And he said, when you ask these people who self-identify as evangelicals, you ask them what they do, what they believe.
	Do they even believe the Bible?
	And you find that, well, only about a, I think you said it was about a fifth of them.
	There was a very small minority that actually believe any of this stuff.
	It's just a label that they use.
	And it's a label that's become a political label.
	It's almost like a political party.
	So it's not really a surprise since we've had this politicized label of evangelicals, you know, for all of the political polls that they've had for years.
	It's really not a surprise that these people have now just become purely political in their orientation and what they're looking for.
	This one person that they interviewed said she'd had perfect attendance award as a child going to church.
	As an adult, she taught Sunday school, but these days, she's now 67 years old, and she is a counter-attendant at a slot machine party, and she no longer goes to church, but she still identifies as the evangelical Christian.
	She doesn't believe going to church is necessary.
	I have my own little thing with the Lord.
	This is part of the post-modernism.
	I don't believe what the Bible says about anything.
	I can define my own scheme of right and wrong, you know, just like a chat.
	You know, they've got chat G-O-D. They just make up whatever they want.
	Another person said, no one plays a more central role in her perspective than Trump.
	The man she believes can defeat the Democrats who she is certain are destroying this country, and they are bound for hell, she said.
	Trump is our David and our Goliath.
	As I said the other day when I mentioned that quote, I said, does she even know that Goliath was the bad guy?
	Being evangelical once suggested regular church attendance, a focus on salvation, conversion, strongly held views on specific issues such as abortion.
	You notice they don't say anything about believing the Bible and trying to make that the standard of your life.
	They don't say anything about that.
	Another woman, actually this is the same woman, in her early 20s she was married to a man who didn't believe so she dropped out of, she said, going to the building.
	But they said at first declines that we have seen in the last few years mostly affected the more liberal mainline Protestant denominations.
	Because again, they became social causes.
	They had a social gospel.
	Many times left-wing, sometimes it was, now we see a right-wing social gospel, or a politicized gospel.
	So they were focused on social causes.
	They weren't grounded in the Bible, and so a lot of people saw the hypocrisy.
	But what they talk about with this is they said, you know, we saw this big decline in the mainline Protestant denominations, but in recent years, in 2020, it spread to all these different ones.
	Guess what? It's because people saw the hypocrisy.
	They'd seen the hypocrisy in the mainline churches.
	Then when 2020 happened, people could see that they were afraid of people who didn't wear masks.
	They could see that they feared government edicts.
	They feared man.
	They feared disease.
	More than they feared God.
	It's not to say that you shouldn't fear government and man and disease, but not more than God.
	And so people saw this hypocrisy.
	It's like, well, why would I participate in that?
	One guy has written a book about it called The Great De-Churching, which happened in 2020.
	That's another precedent that Trump has done.
	Stop and think about it.
	And it's the same type of thing we've talked about so many times with a business, small business, Main Street business, how he destroyed their life work.
	And he was able to do that in a large degree to an already weakening, declining church.
	He was able to come in and kick it the rest of the way down.
	George Barna, again, looking at this, he put out a poll and he said, look at this, from 2015 to 2020 and then from 2020 to 2022.
	So one of those, the first bracket there, even though they've got this equally spaced, the first bracket there is a five-year period.
	And the second one is just a two-year period.
	And so he was looking at things like, does the pastor feel satisfied with his vocation as a pastor?
	And these things radically declined.
	For example, if you're confident about their calling, that went from, in 2015, from 66% of the people that he polled, Down to 35.
	They're starting to have self-doubts.
	Am I really called to do this?
	Are they satisfied with their vocation?
	That took a big downturn.
	From 2015 to 2020, it went from 72% down to 67%.
	But in just a two-year period of time, it dropped from 67% to 52%.
	So in a five-year period of time, it had an unsteady decline, but over a five-year period, it went down by five percentage points.
	But over a two-year period, it went down by 15 percentage points.
	That steep curve there picked up.
	What was it that did it? It was what happened in 2020.
	People looked at this and they said, well, am I satisfied with this?
	Do I feel like this is what I'm called to?
	What about this church?
	Is that what I'm satisfied with?
	And the same thing is happening not just with the pastors out there.
	It's not just that they're demoralized, but the people are demoralized.
	And, of course, Trump did that to small businesses as well.
	He demoralized them, and he demonetized them.
	This is why this is not an issue that should go away and be forgotten.
	But one person, raised as a Baptist, Miss Hatfield, says she no longer attends church.
	She said, I voted for Trump twice and I'll vote for him again.
	And she said, he is the only savior I can see.
	Don't tell me these people are not idolaters.
	They really are. I just try to do what's right.
	I pray to God every night, but I don't go to church.
	I don't do anything. And the only Savior that I see is this guy who is a known con man, a proven liar, and a mass murderer.
	That's the only Savior she sees.
	When the light of the eye is darkness, How dark is the interior, right?
	The inside of a person.
	Well, that's what Jesus said.
	At Trump's rally in Coralville, Iowa, a 27-year-old local evangelist who does not lead a church delivered the opening prayer.
	The crowd responded tepidly to his impassioned recitation of several Bible verses, but the rally-goers roared to life when he set the Bible aside and This election is part of a spiritual battle.
	Everything in our life every day is.
	This election is no different.
	This is not the most important election of our life.
	Most important election of my life.
	I didn't even get a vote in when God elected me and chose to save me.
	When Donald Trump became the 47th president of the United States, he said, when he becomes it, there will be retribution against all those who have promoted evil in this country.
	And that's what they want.
	Maybe he needs to open up the Bible again and read the part where God says, vengeance is mine.
	But let me just ask you, what about the guy...
	Who destroys our businesses, our schools, our churches, our lives, our transportation?
	Helps to lock down churches?
	Helps to push a mark of the beast identification program for global marking?
	Where is the discernment about this?
	Is this guy a David or a Goliath?
	Oh, he's both David and Goliath, they say.
	No, I think they've got, instead of, they always like to say, if you criticize Trump, you've got Trump derangement syndrome.
	Now, these people have a Trump-strong delusion.
	They have TSD. Not TDS, but they have TSD. A Trump strong delusion.
	And they continue to follow him no matter what.
	And so, this article was on CBS, and it was picked up by Drudge at the end of the week last week.
	And it was inside the secular churches that fill a need for some non-religious Americans.
	And when I looked at that, I thought, you know, that is a big part of why you're seeing this church fall away.
	For the longest time, I think there's been non-religious Americans who have been filling the churches because they want the same thing these atheists want.
	They want to have some kind of human contact.
	That's a natural thing, which the globalists and Trump decided that they were going to shut down with the lockdowns.
	People crave that.
	You need it for health.
	You need it for survival.
	And so these people, even though they don't believe in God and they have their own religion of atheism or whatever, and there's been a lot of churches that have really been like that.
	You've got the United Church of Christ, which is, you know, they will typically join in with the ACLU to shut down any free exercise of religion.
	But even the atheists need some kind of a social interaction.
	I think there's probably a lot of atheists that always used to attend churches when they liked the social atmosphere that was going on there.
	You go back to the 1800s, it was a big social thing.
	And there wasn't any movies, there wasn't any television, anything like that.
	And so people would go just to interact with other people, to watch a show, to watch a presentation, but they didn't necessarily believe it.
	And so now we've got outright secular churches.
	We've got the Church of Satan.
	They don't believe anything that they're putting on.
	They are quite frank about the fact they don't believe any of that.
	But you've also got the Church of MAGA. And that's really what this Reawaken America thing is, with Flynn and Roger Stone.
	It's just a secular, atheist church that's focused around their common delusion about Trump.
	So what is an atheist church?
	Well, secular congregations mimic religious organizations.
	We've had a lot of churches that have been hollowed out, imitations of the real thing for a very long time.
	They have the structure of a church.
	They meet somewhere. They've got a building.
	And so, you know, they maybe even have some kind of a celebrity there, like Trump.
	These secular congregations often appeal to atheists and other secular people, but their main purpose is not promoting atheism.
	The Church of Satan, its main purpose is to shut down people from being able to exercise their religion.
	They have sing-alongs, they have testimonies of where they are in life, you know, like an AA meeting or something like that.
	So they share different aspects of their life and very personal things in their life, and they sing.
	There's just nothing supernatural.
	I thought, isn't that so true of so many of our churches?
	And those churches, where there's nothing supernatural happening with them, those churches can't weather the storm, as we saw four years ago.
	But, of course, the storm was being blown by somebody like Donald Trump.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSRadio.com.
	Well, as we look at what is happening earlier, we had the good news, as Jen pointed out.
	I haven't seen the show.
	I'll look into it, see what's going on with it.
	But the idea that the SEC was going to make their decision today about whether they're going to allow natural asset companies, that big scam, I've partnered with New York Stock Exchange and the Rockefeller Foundation and some other big hitters.
	Sometimes we win.
	Sometimes people wake up.
	And I think a lot of people are starting to wake up with this electric car scam as well.
	65% of Americans...
	Say that they are unlikely to buy electric cars as they strand drivers in the wintertime.
	Karen came up, we saw this on social media, came across this cartoon here.
	They got a guy who is, he's got his car plugged into a charger and the charger is sitting there at the base of a giant windmill.
	And the windmill is not moving and it's got icicles all over it.
	And he's on the phone and he goes, yes, it is plugged in.
	Now what? It's not taking a charge.
	So, yeah, that's what a lot of people are starting to figure out.
	So, it's just not ready for prime time.
	That's one of the reasons why. Isn't it amazing that we live at a time, I never thought this would happen in America, where we'd have the government design cars.
	Not in America. I mean, we've seen this in the Soviet Union.
	You've got a little Lada car and other things like that that didn't work very well.
	And yet we've got these people like John Kerry and Joe Biden, and they're telling us what we should drive, what we must drive, and what we cannot drive.
	It absolutely is absurd.
	A Canadian man has pled guilty to 14 counts of arson for deliberately starting wildfires in Canada in 2023.
	And do you see anything about this anywhere?
	No. No. As a matter of fact, this is picked up.
	The only place that I saw it was at Wine Press.
	It was reported in the Canadian press.
	But complete silence and crickets from everybody else in America.
	Why? Because they wanted everybody to believe that those massive, persistent wildfires up in Canada were simply due to climate change.
	And we showed over and over again.
	Places where there was arson being committed.
	I remember even aerial footage of a guy going around from place to place setting fires.
	But it was all natural occurring and it was all because of your car, the car that you drive.
	So we've got to take the car that you drive.
	No, it was arson. And as I've said many times, their policies, their environmental policies have exacerbated this.
	In the sense that they would not do stewardship anymore.
	Instead, it became about a religion, environmentalism.
	We're going to leave the trees there.
	If they die, don't touch them.
	Can't take the dead wood out, so it becomes fuel.
	And now we go to even the extreme lunacy that Bill Gates is saying, and because of these wildfires that they say happen because of global warming and because of cars, not because of arsonists, But now we know that it is arsonist,
	but they're saying, because of all that, you know, we've got these uncontrollable wildfires, so that's another reason why we've got to have more climate change regulations, and Bill Gates wants to cut down trees and bury them, because it's going to be CO2. The same people who, a couple of years ago, were telling us we had to pay them money to plant trees.
	It never stops, these people.
	As soon as you expose one lie, they jump on the other side of it.
	Other good news, even as we won with the NAC stuff, we see tractor protests increasing and now spreading to France.
	They had massive protests in Germany.
	Now it is spreading to France as you have...
	Macron trying to, I guess we could call him Emmanuel Manure.
	They're trying to outlaw manure and farmers and diesel fuel and everything else like that.
	Before we run out of time, some comments on Rockfin.
	Brian and Deb McCartney. Our granddaughter was in a Catholic hospital, St.
	Mary's, no doubt. It is filled with relics and trillions and artwork, etc.
	We left chick tracks all over that place and parking ramp on our only visit.
	Well, that was one of the things by Karen's brother when he went to Italy.
	You know, it really made him angry.
	He's an artist and it's made him angry to see how much art was there.
	But now you've got a lot of Catholics who are angry at this Marxist Jesuit who is Pope.
	And it's no longer a joke as a pope Catholic.
	He doesn't even adhere to the Catholic traditions.
	On Rumble, Stealth Patriot, when you refuse to bow down to the new golden Trump image, he might have you thrown in the fiery furnace with your two friends.
	Well, I'd be just fine with that.
	As a matter of fact, I used that reference when Trump was locking everybody down.
	I said, you know what? People ought to...
	I ought to say it's the same thing that Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego said.
	They said, well, you know, God can save us from this, but if he doesn't, know this, I'm not going to bow down to you.
	That ought to be our attitude, you know?
	God may save you from this.
	He may not save you. There's a lot of people who've been martyred, and that's up to him.
	And, of course, over a period of time, we can see The benefit that came from that, overall, we can understand, perhaps, what God was doing with that.
	But that's his decision.
	Our decision is that we're not going to bow down to these people.
	And on Rumble, High Boost says, 501c3 was started to subvert the church.
	I think it was LBJ who did it.
	Well, what LBJ did was he put in what they called the...
	Ah, let's see, what do they call it?
	They called it the LBJ Amendment, I believe, acting as if it was some law that was amended.
	And it was LBJ, who as a senator, was very upset about some churches that opposed him in Texas for re-election.
	And so he decided that he was going to shut that down.
	And so he got the IRS to put out a ruling saying that if you were a 501c3, you cannot, a church, you can't talk about politics.
	And of course, a lot of people, a lot of Democrat, liberal churches, black churches with Democrats would go all the time.
	They had no problem with that. And that was nullified by people who did exactly what I was talking about.
	They said, you can throw us in jail, but you're not going to tell us what we can say.
	And they sent tapes of it to the IRS. The IRS refused to do anything about it, and that ended it.
	And that ends our show.
	Thank you for listening. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲