Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 4, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:56

The David Knight Show - 01/04/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 4th of January, year of our Lord 2024.
	The David Knight Show.
	At a time that recalls the Christmas carol, I heard the bells on Christmas Day.
	Well, they've begun the new year with not bells, but bombs.
	Bombs everywhere. We're going to take a look at what is going on in Iran.
	Is the U.S. government involved in terrorism abroad as it is involved in invasion of America, bringing the barbarians into the gate?
	People talk about the Great Replacement.
	The basis of the Great Replacement is the Great Magnet.
	And now we're going to see what is going to happen to Mayorkas.
	Is he going to be impeached by the Republicans?
	If he is, that would be the first time impeachment is actually used for somebody violating their job.
	So we'll be right back.
	We'll begin by taking a look at what is happening over the last couple of days as they kick the ant's nest, strike the hornet's nest.
	We'll be right back. Well, on the fourth anniversary of the American assassination of an Iranian general,
	and of course America made no attempt to hide that, on the fourth anniversary as he was being celebrated at a memorial service as a hero in Iran, You had two bombs go off and have killed.
	Of course, the counts are constantly fluctuating.
	So many people were so badly mutilated that some of them were counted twice.
	But so many people that were not killed.
	So first it went up, then it went down.
	Now it's going back up because so many people were so severely wounded.
	But more than 100 people most likely killed on the fourth anniversary of the American assassination of Soleimani in a U.S. airstrike.
	And so immediately the U.S. says the U.S. and Israel are not involved.
	I don't know why anybody would think that they are.
	I mean, you know, we're such peace-loving people.
	We don't want to get involved in any foreign entanglements.
	We don't start wars.
	No, not America.
	Why would we be suspected of all of this stuff?
	We would never do something like blow up the Nord Stream pipeline so that we could punish Russia, make Europe more dependent on us.
	We would never do anything like that, except that we did.
	And then we have people like Lindsey Graham.
	I've been saying for six months now, hit Iran.
	They have oil fields out in the open.
	They have the Revolutionary Guard headquarters you can see from space.
	Blow it off the map.
	Or people like Nuki Haley.
	What would you do with Iran if you're president?
	What would you do? You know, I mean, it's what I said to Netanyahu.
	Finish them. Finish them.
	This is enough.
	They're only going to try and kill us and kill Israelis.
	We've got to put an end to this.
	Yeah, let's strike them.
	Pearl Harbor, right?
	And again, we keep going back to Pearl Harbor.
	And I said from the very beginning, as Israel was saying, Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor.
	I said, well, maybe they're trying to tell us something.
	It doesn't excuse Japan.
	It still was a start of a war.
	It still gave justification for war.
	But FDR allowed American soldiers and civilians to be killed in order to allow them to carry out a first strike that they knew was coming.
	I believe from the very beginning that that was true in Israel.
	I still believe it today. As a matter of fact, even more so.
	And there's a lot of Israelis who have filed lawsuits against the government, accusing them of that very thing as well.
	They think they can prove it in court.
	We'll see. So, the reality is, is that when somebody does a strike like that, certainly they are responsible and should be punished.
	But then the question is, how do we conduct the war?
	It's not just whether or not a war is justified in its beginning.
	But how do we conduct the war?
	Do we focus on civilians?
	You know, you heard Nuki Haley saying, well, let's start the war.
	And so many people, as I've said so many times, think of Iran, and I'm not an Iran apologist by any means.
	It is a radical Islamic regime that has been involved in wars throughout the region, essentially doing the same thing we're doing.
	They've just had a couple of commanders who were killed in an assassination strike a week before all this happened.
	They were in Syria.
	So the question is, what is Iran doing in Syria?
	Well, they're up to no good. They're fomenting war, right?
	But we have people who are killed in Syria.
	What are we doing in Syria?
	We're also up to no good.
	We're fomenting war and unrest.
	So what they're doing is no different from what we're doing, if you want to point out that.
	And of course, the logic of Nuki Haley is the same as that of Yamamoto.
	Well, eventually we're going to have a war, so let's get them first.
	Why is that necessary?
	Of course, this is all dismissed as a conspiracy theory, even though they openly conspire to do this.
	It's not a theory.
	It's the way they operate. And so now you've got these people who have been kicking the ant bed, who have been striking the hornet's nest.
	They want a war. They want a war badly.
	And we know why they want war.
	War is to the advantage of people like Netanyahu, who are politically on the ropes in his own country.
	War is to the advantage of Joe Biden, who is politically on the ropes in his own country.
	If they strike America, boy, it's going to be, you know, everybody waving flags.
	Go get them, Joe. That's what he wants.
	That's his path. That's the path of all these people.
	To send us to war.
	I hope we don't fall for it.
	But it's looking more and more like that's going to be the case.
	So, when you look at the casualties that are there, and what happened immediately before that, less than 24 hours before that, you had Israel...
	Killing a Hamas leader in Beirut.
	An assassination. A targeted assassination.
	And a week before that, You had targeted assassinations by Israel of Iranian military leaders in Syria.
	As I said before, why are they doing it in Syria?
	Well, they're obviously involved in war.
	And frankly, I don't have a problem with going after Hamas leaders.
	I said, hey, you know, after October the 7th, go after the Hamas leaders.
	What I have a problem with is the massive and sustained bombing of the civilian population.
	I would love to see targeted assassinations on both sides so that the little people don't have to fight the wars that the big guys start.
	If they're going to start a war, let them fight it out amongst themselves.
	They can assassinate each other.
	That'd be justified. It'd almost be like trial by combat.
	Well, the kings go out and fight each other, but they don't.
	The kings send the rest of us out to fight.
	And now the kings attack the people who are not even combatants.
	And that's not justified.
	But it is now common.
	Everyone is doing that. We don't have justified wars anymore.
	It's kind of like when I talk about the death penalty.
	Certainly the death penalty is warranted for somebody who is guilty.
	But how do we determine if people are guilty?
	Do we have a just system anymore?
	To determine if somebody's committed murder, our court systems are so messed up.
	I don't typically trust them to make that determination.
	There are some cases where it is so obvious.
	Yes, if it is really obvious.
	But in most cases, our justice system, so-called justice system, is so messed up that I wouldn't support a death penalty for most circumstances.
	And that's the way it is with war.
	War can be justified.
	But I don't know any country that is involved in just war anymore.
	Everybody is focused on civilian populations, even if they wait until they are attacked and respond in self-defense of their own nation.
	So this happened just less than 24 hours before this bombing of the memorial service for this guy who was assassinated four years ago.
	And Trump, we know that.
	Trump bragged about it. The U.S. military bragged about how they had taken him out.
	So, the U.S. killed the guy that they're having the ceremony for.
	All these people are bombed at that ceremony.
	And then, less than 24 hours before that, you had Israel going into a foreign country, into Beirut, and assassinating this leader.
	So I don't know why anybody would think that the US and Israel are going to be involved in this.
	I mean, it's absolutely absurd, isn't it?
	We would never do anything like that, except we do it all the time.
	Iran says at least 84 were killed at blasts of the ceremony honoring the slain general.
	An earlier death toll of 103 was twice revised lower after officials realized some names had been repeated on a list of victims and due to severity of wounds suffered by some of the dead, health authorities said.
	Many of the wounded were in critical condition, however, so the death toll could rise.
	You know, when we look at this...
	The Iran regime is insane, and many people in Iran believe that and are opposed to it, because it is a Sharia law.
	You have the radical Islamicists in charge of it.
	They have been aggressive and provocative throughout the region.
	And yet, you know, when you look at a situation like we had, I want to talk about Flight 800.
	I always point out that so many witnesses...
	And people who saw the flight records were confiscated then by the FBI because they didn't want to have any evidence out there.
	So many people who saw that said it was a missile, and there was a military training exercise that was going on.
	It apparently was, from all indications, and I've talked to Jack Cashel and others who've done a lot of research on it.
	It was the U.S. Navy that accidentally shot down that airliner.
	And... To make it even more obvious, the U.S. Navy conducting exercises in and around Iran accidentally shot down an Iranian airliner.
	What did the Iranians do about it?
	Well, they took them to court and the U.S. admitted that they did it and they paid a piddling amount to the families of the people who were killed.
	Everybody on board was killed as they were on Flight 800.
	And so, it's not an absurd, you know, accidents like that can happen.
	But, of course, they would never admit it on U.S. soil.
	They will use the FBI to do anything to cover it up, to seize and destroy evidence and everything else.
	But, you know, when you look at it, it's very clear what they have done.
	I say that because most people began their understanding of Iran with the installation of the Ayatollah Khomeini and the takeover of the U.S. Embassy.
	Our involvement in Iran began back in the 1950s when there was a left-wing leader who was going to nationalize oil industries, and the U.S. government threw him out with a coup and installed the Shah of Iran, and he ran an amazingly repressive regime with secret police who arrested and tortured people, trained by our CIA. That's where it begins.
	And so we need to have that context there.
	Because we need to understand we're not the guys on the white horse here.
	Neither are they. There's no heroes here on either side.
	And it just keeps getting worse with people like Lindsey and Nuki.
	So the first bomb was detonated about 3 p.m.
	And then a second bomb about 20 minutes later.
	Now the only thing I would say is that, you know, if it was...
	If it was a missile, some kind of Reaper drone missile, it would definitely be the U.S. But again, if they're going to do something so bold as this, they would want to make it not look like it was them.
	And operating inside Iran, Mossad has used bombing campaigns in the past to take out Iranian scientists who are working on the nuclear program.
	They have many situations where they would have somebody on a motorcycle and Drive up beside the car where the scientist was being what was in and attach a magnetic bomb to it and blow it up that way.
	So we don't have any information about this, but certainly it is going to be provocative.
	Heroing video shows scores of bloodied victims lying on the floors.
	Others stumbled away from the blast scene close to the mosque where Soleimani is buried.
	And, again, whoever did it, it is a terrorist attack.
	And the fingers will point to the U.S. because of people like Lindsey Graham and Nuki Haley who genuinely want to get us involved in a broader war.
	All these politicians. On both sides, we have politicians like that.
	It's not just the Biden administration.
	Republicans like Nuki and Lindsay.
	The strike that killed Soleimani unfolded January the 3rd, 2020, close to the Baghdad airport.
	He had arrived at the airport on a plane from either Syria or Lebanon when he was met on the tarmac by then deputy commander of the popular mobilization forces in Iraq.
	Moments later, as their cars passed through a cargo area headed for an access road leading out of the airport, the convoy was struck by four missiles fired by Reaper drone, Both vehicles were instantly reduced to smoldering wrecks, killing Soleimani, and four others.
	And so again, when he was assassinated, he wasn't assassinated in Iran.
	He was assassinated in Iraq because he was there fomenting war.
	So, it is not really clear where this is going to head now, but we know that they're continually pushing this in every way that they can, as we are occupying Syria at the same time.
	So, the assassination strike that was a week ago was in Damascus.
	So, less than 24 hours before, there was an assassination strike in Beirut, Lebanon, by Israel.
	And so, Hezbollah, there at the border, Lebanon, Israel has said, we're ready for two wars, and it looks like they're trying to provoke it as well.
	And then one week before that...
	You had another Iranian senior advisor who was killed, this time in Syria, in Damascus.
	So he went to Damascus, then went to Beirut, then to Tehran.
	And all these have happened in about a week.
	Iran's state television interrupted its regularly scheduled program to announce he had been killed.
	A Revolutionary Guard statement said he was one of the Guard's most important figures in Syria, again, exporting war.
	He was also described as a close companion to Soleimani.
	It was killed four years ago on the anniversary of this thing.
	And early this month, Iran accused Israel of killing two members of the Revolutionary Guards in Syria.
	So a couple of strikes in Syria.
	As Brian Shulhavi says, World War III has spread to Lebanon, to Turkey.
	Turkey is conducting operations against Mossad spies and aligning with Iran.
	And, of course, Turkey is part of NATO. So, it is not a solid alliance.
	And when you look at the, well, for example, he quotes Florida Congressman Mike Waltz.
	As he points out, represents Zionist Republicans.
	Cheering the assassination, he said, if I were any Hamas leader right now, whether you're in Turkey, Beirut, or elsewhere, I would not sleep well tonight.
	The Israelis will hunt them down.
	And again, as I said, I don't have any problem.
	We're hunting down the people who are starting wars, people who are killing civilians who are doing terrorist stuff.
	It's the mass bombings of civilians that I have a problem with.
	But as Brian says, The congressman from Florida is not too well informed if he thinks that Turkey is going to comply with that.
	Turkey has made it very clear that they will not allow Israel to hunt down Palestinians inside Turkey.
	In fact, the Turkish police intelligence officers have just reportedly completed operations earlier today to round up dozens of spies they say were working with Israel's Mossad to prevent that from happening.
	34 nabbed, and they say that it was an assassination plot to be carried out in Turkey.
	The investigation found that Israeli intelligence was behind activities targeting foreigners residing in Turkey, from reconnaissance to assaults and to abduction attempts.
	No other details were available regarding the investigation, but Mossad was implicated in the past in investigations about attempts to kidnap Palestinians living in Turkey.
	Turkish intelligence sources said to their official news agency last month that Israeli intelligence was warned against any attempts to assassinate members of the Palestinian resistance of Hamas in Turkey.
	Israel will hunt down Hamas in Lebanon, Turkey, and Qatar, even if it takes years, said the head of Israel's domestic security agency, Shen Bat.
	But Tim Walz has not gotten the memo yet from Turkey.
	And so is this something else that's going to fracture NATO? You know, Congress just voted that the US can't get out of NATO. Well, of course, they can say that we can never leave NATO, but it depends on if we have a politician who puts America first.
	I don't see any of them on the horizon, though.
	Like his neighbor, Turkey, Iran, has outspoken on the Palestine-Israel conflict and backs the Houthis in Yemen.
	Okay, so Turkey's backing the bunch of the Houthi hooligans, that's what we should call them, who are attacking shipping.
	And of course, that's another aspect of conflict, as the U.S. is issuing an ultimatum about that.
	Turkey is the only Muslim country that is part of NATO, and it's been a constant problem for NATO since Turkey maintains close ties with Russia as well.
	No ships can pass through the Black Sea from the Mediterranean without going through the Bosporus Strait in Istanbul.
	Istanbul, not Constantinople, as the song goes.
	And the permission of the Turkish military.
	So American politicians need to wake up and realize that Turkey is not their puppet and will not hesitate to defy Western nations, even though they're part of NATO. As the British learned when Turkey just recently refused to allow two British Navy mine hunter ships to pass through to Ukraine,
	So they are declaring their independence and they are allying themselves with, you know, Turkey shares a border with Iran and Turkey shares a border with Russia.
	So perhaps they don't want to be too belligerent with either party just for self-preservation.
	As most of the news is regarding the war in the Middle East right now, Russia just shot 100 missiles in Kiev last night, the capital of Ukraine, their largest city.
	Russia pounds Kiev with 100 missiles as the air war escalates.
	A deadly tit for tat. You know, I didn't point it out, but right at midnight, you had the Palestinians launched a bunch of rockets into Israel, the Hamas did, to land right about midnight.
	And the Russians did a massive drone strike right about the same time.
	And I thought, you know, this is...
	One way to ring in the new year, a very prophetic way to ring in the new year, is everybody on both sides wants a war.
	And you know, it's not just world war, as I said, in this fourth turning.
	It's not just that Russia wants a war, Hamas wants a war, the U.S. wants a war, NATO wants a war, Israel wants a war.
	If you look at the political landscape here in America...
	AP just did a poll, and they asked people, well, do you want a strong leader who's going to do whatever it takes, whether or not that's within the bounds of the law and the Constitution?
	Oh, yes. Say, a majority of people from every political party, well, say every political, from the Democrats and Republicans, and even the independents, right?
	A majority say, yeah.
	You see, we're at that point in time where nobody wants to have a negotiated settlement.
	As I've said many times before, and I talked about the Civil War the other day, you had the nullification crisis in the 1830s in America.
	And again, it was over protectionism versus free trade and things like that.
	Andrew Jackson was president, and they instituted massive tariffs.
	The South was for open trade because they were primarily agrarian and they were exporting.
	Whereas the powers that were rising in the North that were industrial, they wanted protectionism.
	And so there were massive tariffs that were instituted.
	They called them the tariffs of abomination because they really jacked the prices up.
	And so you had Southern states, especially South Carolina, who again was at the forefront at the beginning of the Civil War.
	They took the bait. They fired on Sumter.
	But they were, they call it the tariffs of abomination, and demanded that they be taken off.
	When they were not taken off, they said, well, they said, we're going to secede.
	We're going to nullify these tariffs and or secede.
	And so what they did was they reached an agreement because the time was not right yet.
	Thirty years later, they went ahead and had a civil war.
	Twenty years ago, when AP asked this same question in the United States, they only had about 25% of the people who said, yeah, I want an authoritarian leader who's going to do what I think is right to knock down my political opponents by force.
	And now that is well over 50% for everybody.
	That's the time we live in.
	That's why I began this year talking about the fourth turning.
	You need to understand how dangerous this time is.
	You may not want war, but the vast majority of people do.
	They want foreign wars.
	They want domestic civil war.
	And then you can add to that the looming economic crisis that is coming.
	The invasion of Across the border that Biden is facilitating, and we'll get into that in just a moment.
	But it truly is going to be a challenging year, both domestically and foreign.
	So the U.S. government responded and said, of course we would never do anything like that.
	Never bomb innocent civilians.
	Neither would Israel, right?
	According to an afternoon press briefing by U.S. National Security Council spokesman Jack Kirby, three points he made.
	He said the White House says the U.S. does not have details on the Iran bombing.
	The U.S. has no indication that Israel was involved in the Iran blast.
	White House says the U.S. will continue to maintain a significant force presence in the Middle East.
	The U.S. will not shrink from defending U.S. interest in the free flow of international commerce.
	And actions in the Red Sea directly threaten freedom of navigation.
	That will be where the next escalation will appear.
	Because they've also thrown down the gauntlet for the Hooties.
	And I understand. Certainly, it's like a death wish from these people.
	But it's going to expand this.
	The U.S. gives Houthis an ultimatum, stop the shipping attacks or face consequences as the American military readies options to strike the Iran-backed rebel group.
	That is certainly justified at this point, frankly, but it is going to be part of the escalation that is there.
	And, you know, you could compare it to what Jefferson did with the Barbary pirates.
	Who were kidnapping ships.
	A different motivation.
	They were doing it for financial purposes.
	This is done because they're angry about what is going on in Gaza.
	But of course the Houthis have been aggressive and at war for quite some time.
	The Islamic world is not monolithic.
	You have the Sunnis and the Shias that are all after each other, as well as the Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia have these different factions.
	They all hate each other and they hate everybody else.
	And so Iran has been helping the Houthis in Yemen attack the Saudis.
	We've been helping the Saudis in this long conflict.
	So now they're attacking shipping.
	And that was something that rather than paying blackmail to the Barbary pirates, Thomas Jefferson sent in the Marines to the shores of Tripoli, as the song goes, and shut them down.
	So I don't have a problem with them coming after the Hooties if they're going to suicidally attack shipping.
	That is a move of suicide.
	But as I said earlier, there are survivors of the October 7th Music Rave Massacre.
	That are suing Israel for negligence.
	Again, this Pearl Harbor thing.
	Dozens of injured survivors of the October 7th Massacre to Music Festival have filed a $56 million lawsuit against the Israeli government, alleging various forms of negligence that resulted in unavoidable casualties.
	The IDF conducted two security assessments over the night leading into October 7th.
	These security assessments were sparked by unusual observations on the border with Gaza.
	This is what I said from the very beginning.
	Many people did. How in the world could they not see any of this, not know any of this?
	Well, it turns out that they did.
	No warnings, however, were given to the organizers of the rave, despite the fact that Shin Bet had taken the threat seriously enough that it deployed to the area soldiers from its unit responsible for thwarting abductions.
	Abduction. It's also been reported that military units put on alert didn't know that the festival was going on.
	A single phone call from IDF officials to the commander responsible for the party to disperse it immediately in view of the expected danger would have saved lives and prevented the physical and mental injuries of hundreds of partygoers.
	In particularly grim twist of fate, the festival was originally slated to last for only two days.
	That's the other aspect of this.
	October 5th and 6th, however, earlier in the week, organizers requested and were granted permission to extend it to October the 7th.
	The Gaza Division's operation officer opposed the extension, arguing it was a needless security risk but was told by his supervisors to approve it.
	Approve it, according to anti-war's Dave DeCamp.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	and when we return, we're going to talk about another serious issue.
	And that is the invasion of the United States.
	Being facilitated, of all things.
	You want to talk about homeland security?
	Do they really care about securing the homeland?
	Of course they don't. They're preoccupied with invasion.
	And the person who is in charge of homeland security...
	is one of the key people who is destroying the security of the homeland so we're going to cover that when we return stay with us You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music?
	Find it now at APSradio.com.
	Well, I've said for the longest time that the real issue, which is even more important than walls or barbed wire or razor wire, whatever you want to have at the border, the most important thing is that we stop pulling people across the border with a giant welfare magnet. the most important thing is that we stop pulling people across the People talk about the Great Replacement, but what I see is a great magnet that is pulling people in.
	You come in, we'll give you free this and free that.
	All you've got to do is get to a certain point, and we'll bring you in and help you.
	We'll give you a free phone. And all the rest of the stuff.
	So illegal immigrants with anchor babies make up more welfare, take up more welfare than all American citizens.
	This is Cloward and Piven's plan for the longest time.
	They said at least 59% of illegal immigrant-led homes use one or more welfare programs compared to 39% of households headed by people born in the United States.
	The Democrats knew this for a very long time.
	And you had Cloward and Piven, two Democrats, who said, you know, We wanted to create a welfare state here to take America down.
	But people are just not...
	The Americans just aren't taking it up in large enough numbers.
	So let's bring people in from other countries and give them welfare.
	So 39% of Americans are on welfare, which is absurdly high.
	But 59% of illegal immigrant households...
	More than half of all illegal immigrant households have one or more U.S.-born children.
	And again, this is the anchor baby stuff.
	Remember all the tough talk from Trump?
	You know, about anchor babies.
	We're going to get rid of these illegal aliens.
	And the journalist in the press was questioning him said, well, you shouldn't call them illegal aliens or something like that.
	And he said, what do you call them?
	I call them our anchor babies.
	You shouldn't call them anchor babies. He said, well, what do you call them?
	I call them children of undocumented migrants.
	And Trump said, I'll call them anchor babies.
	Well, that's great. Except it was all talk.
	He didn't do anything about it.
	He didn't do anything about DACA. Again, DACA. An executive order from the previous president.
	He pretended he couldn't overthrow it.
	He kicks it over to the Supreme Court because he doesn't want to make an unpopular decision.
	The Supreme Court says, no, you can't overturn that executive order from the previous administration, an executive order that says we're not going to enforce immigration law.
	That's what it was. DACA is deferred action.
	In other words, we're not going to enforce the law on immigration.
	Of course, Trump could have done something about that.
	Children born to illegal immigrants in the U.S., also known as anchor babies, are considered to have automatic birthright citizenship.
	Even though the U.S. Supreme Court hasn't explicitly ruled on the matter.
	Oh, yes, they have. They pointed out yesterday, once in the 1840s, another one in 1899.
	And if you look at what the 14th Amendment says, it's clear.
	In every one of those three cases, they said these people don't have citizenship.
	People like Nuki Haley, who's running for president now.
	So, essentially, an anchor baby.
	Her parents were not citizens when she was born.
	They had not been in America long enough to meet the residency requirement.
	That's a clear fact.
	Multiple GOP members have taken strong stance against birthright citizenship.
	In 2018, Trump said that he would remove birthright citizenship via an executive order, which didn't happen.
	Like most of the things Trump said he was going to do.
	In his 2024 campaign, Trump has reiterated his position on the matter.
	So now we can believe him.
	Now he's really going to build the wall.
	Now he's really going to get rid of birthright citizenship.
	And now he's really going to end DACA. Really?
	Are you that stupid to believe this guy?
	Again, in a May video, Trump promised to sign an executive order on day one of his second term to solve the issue of anchor babies.
	That's totally believable, isn't it?
	Well, he said, let's see, breaking in.
	Starting January the 1st, all undocumented migrants, regardless of age, will qualify for Medi-Cal, California's version of federal Medicaid program.
	Again, as I pointed out yesterday, You know, California's the first state to offer free medical care as well.
	They've already said, and it was just a few months ago, California said, if you come across the border as an illegal alien, we'll immediately put you on unemployment.
	So if these people from poor countries make it across the border, they immediately get a $300 a week check.
	Now they get free medical care as well.
	Where do they get all this money in California?
	Well, they've got a looming budget deficit.
	But they had a looming budget deficit before Trump's globalist lockdown.
	And they went from like a projected $20 billion deficit to, in May of 2022, $97.5 billion surplus.
	Now, they raised taxes.
	But it's also the taxes coming in, stimulus checks and other things like that.
	But it was tens of billions of dollars coming from Donald Trump that essentially funded this largesse by Newsom in California.
	But he spent the money so fast that he's gone through even the massive checks that Trump wrote him for the globalist pandemic MacGuffin.
	Middle-class Californians work harder.
	Get a second or third job if you have to because someone has to pay for this.
	Well, don't worry. It'll be bailed out by the federal government.
	Another person says, no surprise, California, despite a budget deficit, will give illegal immigrants subsidized health care.
	The question is how and when they'll get the federal taxpayer to pay them out.
	That's the reality. And the reason that they're doing a lot of this stuff, again, is because the federal government under Trump already bailed out Newsom once.
	So, all undocumented immigrants, or as I would say, illegal aliens, starting January the 1st, are now eligible for this.
	Now, the interesting thing about this is that, you know, the mayors are not doing as well with all this stuff.
	The mayors are really struggling.
	And they're pushing back pretty hard on the massive number of illegal immigrants who are going to these Democrat-run welfare cities.
	But see, the mayors didn't get anywhere near the kind of money, the Trump cash, that Trump did as part of the lockdown.
	And so they're pleading for help.
	Democrat mayors of New York, Chicago, and Denver who didn't get in on the Trump trillions like the state governments did Mayor Adams said, we have reached the breaking point in an executive order.
	He's now requested all charter bus companies to provide a 32-hour advance notice on the arrival of migrants.
	So what did they do?
	Well, the migrants are being bussed in by Abbott, sending them to New Jersey.
	The city estimates 157,000 illegals have arrived since late spring.
	Well, that's nothing.
	And we just had, in one month, 300,000, that's a new record, come across the border, and most of those in Texas.
	And they're going into very, very small towns that are a tiny fraction of the size of New York or the budget of New York.
	They don't have the facilities to feed and house and clothe these people.
	And yet, they say that the problem is the fact that Abbott is sending them where they want to go.
	You remember the clip that I played at one point in time?
	You had a guy, and they had all the people who had, quote-unquote, been apprehended by the Border Patrol, sitting alongside a wall, and he had the reporter go along with the microphone and ask them, because he spoke Spanish as well as English, ask them where they wanted to go.
	And almost every one of them said New York.
	Now they're going to get there one way or the other.
	What is a problem for them is that Abbott is making it happen sooner rather than later.
	They would love to see this kind of chaos from the inside roll out more gradually.
	These people have to take their time getting across the United States.
	They would like to see this in a gradual process so people don't wake up.
	What Abbott is doing is by busing them in, it's waking people up to this crisis because, again, they can't handle it.
	But it's a tiny proportion of what is coming in to Texas.
	The mayor of Denver said, at this point, we have more migrant arrivals in our city than any city in America per capita.
	I don't think that's true.
	I think Eagles Pass does.
	The trio of mayors blamed the migrant crisis on Abbott.
	And Abbott, they said, triples down on efforts to use asylum seekers as political pawns.
	Isn't that what the Biden administration is doing?
	Using them as political pawns?
	As a matter of fact...
	They are being used, and this is a very interesting thing, Thomas Massey has introduced a bill to stop this, but right now, illegal aliens are being used to apportion congressional representation from states.
	How do you justify that?
	They're not citizens. Why do they need to be represented?
	Supposedly, they're not supposed to be able to vote.
	But of course, in a lot of these cities, they're giving them driver's licenses, letting them vote, and that sort of thing.
	But they're counting them as if they were citizens.
	And that gives more congressional representation to these sanctuary states like California than they would have if it was limited to American citizens.
	The mayors, for good reason and likely fear of retribution, entirely omit the fact that the Biden administration's disastrous open southern border is the root cause of this, says Zero Hedge.
	So they're dropping them off in New Jersey rather than taking them directly to New York so they can just finish the trip themselves to go from New Jersey to New York.
	And Eagle Pass, as I said before, Over 22,000 migrants showed up in that small town in just one week.
	Now, they're saying that in nine months, 161,000 have gone into New York.
	Well, if they're coming in at that rate in Eagle Pass, that means that they would have essentially 792,000, not 160,000.
	And that's in a tiny town like Eagle Pass, not into New York City.
	And so, when...
	You look at this and you say, when is anything going to be done about it?
	Well, Mayorkas, the head of Homeland Security, is now still blaming, the standard line now is to blame Texas on all of this.
	And look, I don't know what Abbott is doing.
	He may be making a political ploy here, but it's the right thing to do.
	To drive this lesson home.
	It would be better to send them to the other side, but then you're going to just drop them off the other side, and then the feds will cut the wires and try to bring them back in.
	So send them to these sanctuary cities run by Democrats so people can see what is happening.
	So the Homeland Security Chief, who does not want to secure the homeland, It's calling out Texas.
	And listen to what he says. It is a failure of governance, he says.
	Boy, you want to talk about projection and hypocrisy.
	It's Mayorkas who is failing to govern.
	It's Mayorkas in the Obama administration, the Biden administration, and the Trump administration who failed to enforce the law.
	Don't ever forget that. Even though that was an executive order that happened under Obama, Trump pretended he couldn't do anything about it, and he did nothing about it.
	Trump deferred action on the deferred action for childhood rivals.
	He deferred doing anything about DACA. He deferred it to the Supreme Court.
	He said, you guys decide. I can't decide about this.
	So, Mayorkas is labeling his migrant busing policy of Abbott.
	He calls it a remarkable failure of governance.
	And so, he's going to be facing impeachment proceedings very shortly.
	He had a lot of GOP congressional representatives went to the border, went to Eagles Pass, the center of where so much of this stuff is happening, in a PR ramp-up to the impeachment proceedings for Mayorkas.
	He said on Wednesday on Morning Joe yesterday, Mayorkas said, let me identify one fundamental problem here, and that is the fact that we have one governor in the state of Texas who is refusing to cooperate with other governors and other local officials.
	Yeah, again, the feds are out there cutting razor wire.
	The feds are out there bringing people across the border, giving them phones, now suing Texas for anything like It came from what the Greeks came up with that.
	I've had people coming in who did not speak their language to the Greek ear.
	I've always thought about it. I wonder what English sounds like to non-English speaking people.
	You can kind of fake what Italian or French sounds.
	They have these certain syllables, this cadence to the way they speak.
	I've always wondered what English sounds like to non-English speaking people.
	But to the Greeks, these people who are coming across the border, They said, oh, it just sounds like they're saying bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah.
	So they called them barbarians, right?
	Well, these are people who don't speak our language.
	People who don't care to learn to speak our language.
	So it is, in many cases, they don't want our culture.
	They don't want to be American citizens, even when it is offered to them.
	If you go back and look at the amnesty that Ronald Reagan did, and I forget what the number was exactly.
	I'm... I want to say it was about a third of them accepted the offer of citizenship.
	The other two-thirds didn't want to be American citizens.
	But we'll give them the right to vote.
	We'll give them free health care.
	We'll give them unemployment checks, the rest of the stuff.
	And you don't have to be an American citizen.
	You don't have to learn the language.
	Nothing. Let me identify one fundamental problem here, and that is the fact that we have one governor in the state of Texas, he said.
	So that's the fundamental problem.
	You know, he may be playing politics, but he's giving the sanctuary cities exactly what they want, and he's making that point.
	In December, again, over 300,000 encounters, encounters, Who knows how many people came across that they didn't encounter and process and give a date and say, you know, come back in six or seven years and we'll talk to you about your citizenship stuff.
	In the meantime, here's some free checks and a free phone.
	In just one month, in December, over 300,000 encounters at the border.
	Eric Adams says of Abbott, We're dealing with a bully right now, and everything is on the table that conforms with the law.
	Really? Abbott is a bully?
	I think the people who say that they are running Homeland Security keeps the Homeland secure.
	And yet, what does he do? He sets up massive censorship operations.
	He calls parents who are at school board meetings.
	Homeland Security calls them terrorists, and they don't do anything to secure our homeland.
	Terrorists can come across the border unmolested.
	Drug cartels can come across unmolested.
	They don't care. So he said when he went on with MSNBC, Mayorkas said, well, what we have to do is ensure that migrants receive their work authorization as quickly as possible.
	And I guess also their voter registration, their driver's license, and all the rest of the stuff.
	But even if they don't vote...
	It still means more representation for California and other places like that.
	So the Biden administration is going to the Supreme Court.
	They're asking them to weigh in on this border razor wire.
	They want the Supreme Court to tell the state of Texas that they have to allow Border Patrol agents to remove any barriers at the border.
	Isn't that amazing?
	Last month's appellate court ruling that forced the federal government to stop removing razor wire.
	So now they're going to appeal to the next level up, to the Supreme Court, to try to get it.
	So you've already had a judge stop the federal government from removing obstacles at the border.
	And the next thing that's going to come up It's going to be the fact that Texas state officials have just said that they're going to arrest illegal aliens in the state.
	So that's also something that is a point of conflict between the Homeland Security Director, who is trying to undermine the security of our homeland.
	Biden officials argued that keeping the razor wire could have serious on-the-ground consequences for migrants coming into the United States.
	That's exactly the point.
	The razor wire is only part of Abbott's larger immigration platform that could face other battles in court.
	Last month, he signed a bill that allowed any Texas law enforcement officer to arrest migrants that enter the U.S. illegally.
	Don't call them migrants.
	They're illegal aliens.
	Aliens meaning that they're citizens of somewhere else, and they came here in disregard of the law.
	The Biden administration has already threatened to sue Texas if it enforces this law.
	Well, I just have to say that even if the Supreme Court agrees with Biden, That you can't do anything as a government to stop chaos.
	Abbott's duty is to still continue to do what he's doing.
	The duty of the government is to create law and order.
	Not disorder, not chaos.
	And not to violate and defer action on the law.
	Beginning with Obama, DACA, they have thumbed their nose at American law.
	And they've done it in order to create chaos that doesn't benefit anybody.
	It doesn't benefit the people coming across the border.
	A poll shows that Biden's migration is one of his top problems in the 2024 election.
	35% of people cite immigration on the border as a top concern.
	That's up from 27% last year.
	It's a December poll conducted by the AP. Immigration, however, was not the top thing.
	The top thing was foreign policy.
	Immigration, again, the top concern of 35% of the people.
	38% of the people said foreign policy was their top concern.
	Look, this empire is doomed.
	And it's doomed because it's not just even the leaders, but it's even the public.
	It is more concerned about, and I would say most of these people don't want us to disengage.
	These people say it's their top concern.
	Most of them are going to be pushing for us to get involved more in Israel, more in Ukraine, more in Taiwan.
	When this country and the grassroots of this country are more interested in foreign meddling by this American empire than they are about actually having security for their homeland, that's when this country is truly doomed.
	And I think that is where we are right now.
	So, as I looked at it, way down the list was health care reform.
	Now, what do they mean by that? Well, probably the people who are checking the box on health care reform saying that's their number one thing.
	They want more free health care, which I guess you have to be an illegal alien to get out.
	But no, my concern, when I want health care reform, I want to kill the health dictatorships that are out there.
	All these public health officers, they need to go away.
	And they need to stop this health dictatorship.
	But that's not even on the list.
	It's the usual stuff.
	Foreign policy, immigration, inflation, the economy, education, environment, healthcare reform, poverty.
	Now, a lot of this has to do with the fact that this is being done by the Associated Press.
	Because that does sound like...
	Checklist for the left.
	But it is the establishment checklist.
	Those are the usual questions that they've been asking in the debates when we used to have debates.
	Remember, we don't have those now anymore.
	They don't want to debate each other, and they don't want you debating them on social media or anywhere else.
	You will just do what they say.
	The majority of Americans say immigration is an invasion.
	How about that? I first call that An invasion back in the Obama administration.
	I was labeled as racist, as a hater by the ADL, by the Southern Poverty Law Center, for saying that it was an invasion.
	And now the majority of Americans call it an invasion.
	Because it is! You could see what was happening, but now it's reached such a magnitude that everybody can see it.
	That's what it was. It always was an invasion.
	And now the majority of Americans are calling it that.
	And so even in New York City, in one neighborhood that is close to Floyd Bennett Field, where they have accumulated a lot of people into tent shelters, the migrants are leaving these shelters and going door-to-door to residences begging for food and begging for clothes and other things like that.
	They don't speak English. And it reminds me of this Italian island I've talked about so many times.
	6,000 people living on this Italian island.
	And then within just a few months, they bring in another 18,000 people.
	They bring in, in just a couple of months, three times the number of people that was the original total population in the area.
	And of course, it's total chaos.
	And the governments want that.
	That is part of this.
	And so, there are magnets that are bringing people in.
	Just like welfare magnets and policies that are bringing people in.
	Just like there's NGO organizations that are shipping them in.
	Affiliated with the UN, affiliated with Soros, and affiliated with our own governments that are bringing these people in.
	As Michael Young has pointed out, down the Darien Gap.
	They know which countries they can bring people in from all over the world.
	Well, this country will accept people from that African nation, and this one won't, and so forth.
	And if we've got Chinese, we've got to bring them into this country.
	So they bring them into all these different countries, and then they assist them to make the trip all the way up from Central America through the Darien Gap, a narrow area there in Panama, and up into the United States from all over the world.
	And so in New York City, they're begging for money and food.
	David Fitzgerald, 62, said he noticed an influx of asylum-seeker families showing up at his doorstep in Brooklyn's Marine Park neighborhood in recent weeks asking for spare change.
	He said there's definitely an invasion of immigrants.
	Imagine that. Again, the majority of Americans understand it's an invasion.
	Here's a guy saying that.
	This is on the New York Post.
	He said, it's an invasion of immigrants that are coming from Floyd Bennett Field in our neighborhood, and I see them sitting outside stores, outside the mall, going around to all the houses in the neighborhood, knocking on the door, looking for money.
	I certainly sympathize with their situation, but have people knocking on your door looking for food that don't speak English is annoying.
	I don't like it. We've never had this before, ever, he said.
	Paul Sanzone, who's lived in the neighborhood for 30 years, said migrants now knock on his door on a regular basis.
	And look, this is just a tiny fraction of what is happening in the small cities in Texas.
	He said that he and his wife have been on edge ever since two people showed up at the door, and they had ankle monitors on.
	So what's that about? Other residents have been talking to or taking to a Facebook group that they've set up called Stop Floyd Bennett Illegal Migrants.
	They're aliens.
	They're from, they're citizens of other countries.
	So he suggested that the migrants were resorting to begging because Eric Adams and the city weren't adequately caring for the roughly 1,700 asylum seekers being housed at the Floyd Bennett site.
	So I guess that Eric Adams needs to just pony up and spend more money, right?
	And then if he does, it's not going to be the migrants that are going to be knocking on your door demanding more money.
	It'll be Eric Adams demanding more in taxes.
	And that's not a solution.
	The solution is to not give money, to not offer money, to not offer sanctuary, free welfare.
	That's that magnet.
	I'm going to say, it's the magnet, stupid.
	As I said before, I don't care whether you put razor wire or you put walls or whatever.
	If you offer these people money, just get across here and you've got a pot of gold waiting at the end of that rainbow.
	If that's going to be the case, they're going to come.
	Migrant crisis spreads to remote mountaintown, Carbondale, Colorado.
	As temperatures dipped well below freezing one evening, dozens of young men, nearly all of them from Venezuela.
	Rested on cots in an events hall now housing 60 migrants.
	In the snow-fringed dirt parking lot outside, dozens more prepared to spend the night in cars that they'd purchased in the weeks since they crossed into the United States.
	These are guys who can purchase cars as we look at this.
	So, Republicans are proceeding with impeachment proceedings against...
	The so-called Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas.
	They will begin on January the 10th.
	Was that next Tuesday, I guess?
	Yeah, Tuesday.
	Holding their first impeachment hearings.
	60 House Republicans and Speaker Johnson went to Eagle Pass, Texas over the holidays to tour the border to hold a press conference about this as a preliminary to this impeachment thing.
	Senior members of the House majority have said there's no valid basis to impeach Secretary Mayorkas.
	Well, I don't know.
	I mean, if he's all about homeland security and yet he violates the security of the homeland, shouldn't you take him out?
	That's a misdemeanor if it's not a crime.
	He directly threatens the security of the homeland.
	I mean, isn't that what he's looking for from Americans?
	You know, I think you showing up at that PTA meeting or that school board meeting, I think that threatens America's security.
	I think you're a terrorist. You're not a parent, you're a terrorist.
	He wants to make these absurd claims about what threatens the security of the homeland, and yet his policies, his policies threaten the security of the homeland.
	There is a basis for impeaching him.
	House Republicans have long clamored to impeach him.
	Blaming him for the crisis at the southern border.
	Why? Well, because that's his responsibility.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene attempted to force an impeachment vote on him last year, but under that leadership, they blocked it.
	That's a different thing this year around.
	I think that Johnson is a much smarter politician, and he knows what an important issue the border is for everybody.
	He knows that's going to be a winning issue on a bipartisan basis.
	So, the U.S. is calling Israeli officials irresponsible for suggesting Palestinian relocation.
	And understand that it's, in this particular rhetoric that is coming from, just came out this last week, a couple officials in Israel, who then doubled down after the U.S. said it's irresponsible.
	They're not calling for just, well, send the Palestinians somewhere.
	I don't know where. They've specifically said in the past, To the USA. Or to Europe.
	Or to places like that.
	So these are people that they have labeled as terrorists and they want to send them to us.
	Millions that they have labeled as terrorists.
	Remember when Castro emptied out his prisons and the Marial boat lift?
	Everybody said, look at that.
	He's sending us, you know, criminals from Cuba.
	And the Cubans were angry about that as well.
	Why aren't people angry about the suggestion that they send these Palestinians to America and to Europe?
	Even the Jews who are in America and Europe, why would they want that?
	Why would they not criticize Israel over that?
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	Before we do, real quickly, on Rockfin, Christopher Mincy said, here in Cleveland, Texas, there are migrants camping out in the forest.
	And the county is providing them social services.
	Yeah, that's why I said, you know, Abbott has been a real mixed bag with all this stuff.
	And in the past, he's done a lot of empty virtue signaling.
	I remember he sent like a dozen state trooper cars down to the border, parked them in a line as if he's going to have enough cars to cover that Texas border, and then take a picture of it with them all bunched up.
	See, I'm protecting the border. And it was total nonsense.
	It was just a photo op. So again, he's doing some of the right things.
	He may be angling cars.
	To run for president in the future or to try to get on as a vice presidential candidate.
	There's something going on behind this stuff.
	I don't trust him. You shouldn't trust any politicians.
	But anyway, he says, Montgomery County, quote-unquote conservative.
	20 years ago in Texas, it was rare to see homeless camps, but now it's becoming normal.
	And this is MAGA country.
	That's right. We're going to put America first and make America great.
	Just keep the borders open.
	And just remember that Trump did absolutely nothing about that when he was president.
	All of the bragging and the boasting about what he was going to do, and he's bragging and boasting about all those same things that he didn't do in four years.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, You'll love the classic hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. APSradio.com
	APSradio.com
	APSradio.com Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	APSradio.com And now, the David Knight Show.
	Well, let's talk about some general news.
	I know everybody wants to hear about Jeffrey Epstein and the list, and we'll talk about that.
	But before we do, let's go back to a kinder, gentler America, one portrayed in It's a Wonderful Life.
	There's so much wonderful stuff in that movie by Frank Capra.
	And so this is an essay that somebody wrote about this, and I realize when watching It's a Wonderful Life that the real hero of the story isn't George, it's Mary.
	The movie starts off with Mary praying to God for God to be with George.
	It's full of romance and the old place.
	The beauty of the old broken down house is full of romance.
	She told George about the empty space.
	When she looked at the broken down house, she had the vision that it could be a place that would be filled with a family and its love.
	When George kisses the broken banister knob, He finally sees that.
	Sees her vision. She was the one who transformed the place into a honeymoon suite.
	Of course, that happened after she had the idea to offer the $2,000 for the honeymoon to the people who had been hurt by the bank run.
	And to keep the savings and loan up in money.
	She never complains. She works day after day, remaking the old house into a home.
	She is the one who goes all over town asking for help for her husband.
	And then when everybody shows up, Uncle Billy says, Mary did it.
	George, Mary did it.
	I never had noticed this, says this person.
	I'd never noticed her expression before.
	When Uncle Billy says this, she's in the background.
	And she says, as he's saying, Mary did it.
	She says, no. And shakes her head.
	And then she moves further into the background.
	It's an incredibly subtle but important feature of her character to do good for others, but to give the credit to other people.
	She moves fully into the background so that everyone giving money to George can come to the front and center.
	This is all orchestrated by her, but she fades into the background.
	George was a good man.
	But he would never have accomplished all that he did and been the man that he was without Mary.
	This essay has said, I think the answer is definitely that he would not have.
	He said, and there are many such Marys in this world who quietly go about offering their prayers, working, and their suffering.
	They raise their children.
	They pray for their husband.
	They make them ten times the men they would have been.
	He says, the person who wrote this says, I know.
	I'm married to one.
	I am too. On another note, this is sent by James.
	He said...
	Enjoy the Christmas album.
	He said, especially the men's voices.
	Is it in Russian, he said?
	Singing the Tchaikovsky piece.
	Actually, they do sound Russian.
	That's why he used it. When I got that, I found that.
	It was on sale this fall.
	And when I was playing around with it for another song, I thought, they sound Russian.
	And they're just going through different syllables in sequence.
	And I started, I just, I'm on the keyboard and I just started playing, you know, the Tchaikovsky piece.
	It's like, yeah, that works. It sounds like that.
	So that's why I put that in there as a verbal thing.
	But yeah, they're not saying anything. It's just gibberish.
	But it works. Anyway, he says, I've not been able to contribute financially, but I will continue to lift you all up in prayer to the Lord who has blessed you.
	Well, thank you. That is a blessing.
	And it is a blessing to have prayer.
	And yet we have governments banning prayer everywhere.
	You know, it's not just in the UK, where you had a woman who's now been arrested three times for silently praying in front of an abortion clinic, silently praying.
	But now in Australia, in Victoria, they are banning prayer as well.
	And they're doing it not for the abortion clinics, but they're doing it for LGBT. One Australian state, Victoria, has already adopted laws that essentially make practicing Christianity, specifically prayer, a crime. And the Daily Signal warns that America is headed in that direction with its bans on conversion therapy because it's the same thing.
	Whether we're talking about abortion or whether we're talking about transgenderism and mutilation of children, these things are protected.
	These people who want to mutilate babies before they're born or the people who want to mutilate young children with their grooming and gaslighting into these operations, they're one and the same.
	And guess what? These satanic agendas of killing, sexually molesting, sexually mutilating children, this satanic agenda, guess what?
	Doesn't like prayer.
	Why? Because it's very effective.
	So, conversion therapy, as I've said many times, is the reason they use that terminology is because they want to stop people talking about where the real power is.
	The real power is not in psychiatry.
	It's not in sitting on a couch.
	The real power is in the throne of God.
	It's not on a psychiatrist's couch.
	And that's why they want to talk about conversion therapy.
	And you know, when we look at this, in Israel it's illegal to convert somebody who's under 18.
	Think about that, right?
	These people are converting children in elementary school to transgenderism, gaslighting them that way.
	But don't talk to anybody about Christianity at the age of 18 in Israel.
	That's against the law since 1977.
	In 1998, they actually came up with a bill that was going to criminalize any materials.
	That could be used to proselytize anyone.
	And people said, well, is that going to make the New Testament illegal?
	And so as people started talking about that, they withdrew that law in 1998.
	But yeah, there's a lot of animus towards that kind of conversion.
	That's what these people are talking about.
	They know that talking to people and giving them the gospel...
	There's a power to save them from all kinds of addictions and all kinds of abuse.
	And that's exactly what transgenderism is.
	It seems the transgender movement aims to demonize any attempt to delay experimental medical interventions on children using conversion therapy label, said the commentary from the Daily Signal.
	In Australia, Victoria's law that condemns certain forms of prayer seems beyond the pale for Americans, and yet in 27 states, along with Washington, D.C., and one U.S. territory, there are laws that ban, quote-unquote, conversion therapy for minors.
	You can convert them to transgenderism, and of course we have the schools that are working very hard on that, but don't go the other way.
	And you can put pornography in the schools and push it to the kids.
	But if the parents push back against that, they're called terrorists.
	And if they're successful in getting the books, the porn books, out of the children's libraries, then the left attacks them as book burners.
	No, it's not a book, it's pornography.
	How long before they outlaw pastors praying for those who are struggling individuals, praying for them in public settings?
	So Victoria has an act that went into effect last year.
	It's called the Change or Suppression Conversion Practices Prohibition Act.
	And it bans certain practices aimed at changing or suppressing an individual's gender identity or their sexual orientation.
	Rather than the religious orientation as it is in Israel.
	And yet, both of these are really about your religious orientation.
	Whether you're talking about the bans on converting kids under 18 in Israel, or you're talking about the ban on talking to kids, to minors, about Christ.
	It's still the same thing.
	It bans carrying out a religious practice including, but not limited to, prayer, a deliverance practice, or an exorcism.
	You know, they're trying to protect these people who say they're two-spirit people.
	Or maybe more.
	Maybe legion. Who knows?
	You can't do anything about that.
	Prayers that are directed at a person to change or to suppress their sexual orientation or gender identity cause harm and are prohibited.
	And prayers that ask for healing, ask for a person to change, that ask for a person not to act on their attractions, that talk about a person's brokenness or their need to repent, or to ask for long-term celibacy.
	Those are all prohibited as well.
	Can't ask for healing.
	Can't ask for change.
	Can't ask for them to have the strength not to act on their attraction.
	Can't talk about repentance or celibacy or any of that.
	The commission says that this is what you're allowed to pray for.
	They can practice their faith without causing harm by petitioning God, quote, for guidance that is supporting and reassuring that the person is created in their God's image and are perfect the way that they are and acknowledge for guidance that is supporting and reassuring that the person is created in their God's image Thank you.
	In other words, pray like a mainline Protestant denomination.
	But look, they're saying that the person is created in God's image and perfect the way that they are.
	Well, why do you need to change their gender then?
	Right? That's what these people are doing in the schools.
	They're telling the kids, you're in the wrong body.
	God got it wrong. So it makes me think about this kind of prayer.
	You always hear this ritualistic prayer at the dinner table.
	Bless this food to the nourishment of our body.
	And you look at it, and it's like Twinkies and other garbage.
	It's like, are you praying for a miracle here?
	Are you praying that God is going to transform this, like, you know, turning water into wine?
	Yeah, bless this for the nourishment of our bodies.
	That really would be a miracle for what most people eat when they're praying.
	Anyway, if calls for repentance violate the law, then Christianity itself has been made illegal in the state of Victoria, home to roughly 7 million Australians.
	And the author points out that the law singles out prayers that concern people who identify as LGBT. Because that is the protected religion that they're selling people.
	They said, you know, when you talk about conversion therapy in the past, that's included things like electroshock and, you know, lobotomies and stuff like that.
	That's what you get from psychiatrists.
	Or you can sit on their couch.
	But, you know, don't pray to God for this kind of conversion.
	So, what they've done is they've also outlawed patient-driven talk therapy now.
	Because these methods of electroshock and lobotomies haven't been done for decades.
	But that's what they're trying to pretend that this is.
	But you can't even sit down and talk to a counselor or to a psychiatrist about this.
	That is outlawed. Isn't it interesting that the founders knew that?
	I think there's a reason why the First Amendment combines free speech with a free exercise of religion.
	And also, while we're looking at the anniversary of January the 6th coming up, The idea that you can protest the government.
	Because when you stop and think about that, the free exercise of religion, protesting what the government is doing, being able to openly talk and debate ideas, we're losing all of that in the West.
	Western civilization is banning all of that.
	At least one recent study showed that LGBT people who undergo non-affirming therapy, in other words, not pushing them into transgenderism, Actually have lower rates of suicide.
	Well, we know that.
	And yet, they tell you exactly the opposite.
	It's like the Homeland Security guy who is, you know, making the Homeland unsecure.
	Meanwhile, Homeland Security, DHS, is funding programs at universities to label the movement called the Manosphere, calling it a terrorist threat.
	See? So many things that Majorca has done that he should be impeached for.
	I mean, it's not just the open border.
	It's not just undermining the security of the homeland as Homeland Security Director.
	But it's also calling everybody that he disagrees with politically a terrorist and using the vast resources of this unconstitutional organization to attack them.
	So the Homeland Security Department has teamed up With universities, by means of funding.
	You hear that? By means of funding.
	I wish that the conservatives could understand that.
	This is reclaim the net, use that phrase.
	They continue to team up, in parentheses, by means of funding.
	You see, Trump teamed up with all those bad Democrat governors like Newsom and Cuomo and all the rest of them.
	He teamed up with them by means of funding.
	I don't understand why people can't understand that's how the government works, the federal government works.
	That's always bribing people with money.
	He teams up with the universities, this time in a bid to stamp out the manosphere.
	They call it an anti-feminist effort.
	They call it a terrorist threat, as they've called parents who are against school-pushed porn.
	And I said, when you look at this, you have to ask, is opposing social and ideological phenomenon, is that, if you've got something like that, is that terrorism?
	This is ideological?
	If it is a social phenomenon, is that terrorism?
	No, it's not. What the government is doing is terrorism.
	Just like what Mayorkas said, you know, well, Abbott is...
	He's abusing government.
	Well, that's the guy who is abusing government.
	He's projecting all this stuff onto other people.
	Some explain this opposition as simply a negative yet lawful reaction to so-called third-wave feminism.
	Sorry, being bankrolled by some of the largest foundations out there.
	But we now have to understand that it was the CIA that was pushing this radical feminism from the start with people like Gloria Steinem and many others like that.
	They... The CIA has always got an agenda of chaos and deconstruction.
	And they've got a lot of people that they've used to push this type of stuff.
	And yet, now these people are calling it terrorism.
	The CIA that starts wars and does coups and does a coup in the United States by pushing these things like radical feminism.
	Saying that now, I guess, it's not okay to be male, just like it's not okay to be white.
	And of course, how do they do it?
	They do it through the universities, don't they?
	We need to defund the universities.
	Arizona State University has forged monetary links with Homeland Security, thanks to documents that have become public showing that.
	They're doing it at a place that is associated with John McCain, the McCain Institute at Arizona State University.
	It has a lot of big tech ties, as well as ties to the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center.
	The people who, when I was saying, you know, two weeks into this whole thing, I said, this is medical martial law, the lockdown stuff.
	They labeled that hate speech.
	Daily Beast called me, you know, hateful conspiracy theorist, anti-Semitic, and all the rest of this stuff.
	That's what they do. So they're going to promote hate speech surveillance from anybody that says it's okay to be male.
	Redirecting traffic from both websites and social networks is what they're going to be given money to do.
	So now it's not just stopping, you know, canceling people on Facebook or on Twitter or whatever.
	Now they want to make sure that if there's some website or social network that is going to support free speech, that they redirect traffic away from it somehow.
	So this is the same government that's calling the manosphere stuff or, you know, anti-feminism.
	The people who are calling that terrorism is the same government that blows up major pipelines, the EU, that most likely was involved in the...
	Bombing of a funeral.
	And they're the ones who are also calling for promoting, saying that men's rights is terror.
	And that parental rights is terror.
	So let's talk about what is going on, not in the manosphere, but in the pedosphere, I guess.
	Jeffrey Epstein.
	What have we found from these declassified things?
	Everybody's looking for a list of names.
	And, of course, we were all told before it got made public, it was leaked, that Bill Clinton was a key person in that.
	But, you know, when we look at what is behind all of this, again, it goes back to the CIA. It goes back to Mossad.
	It goes back to these intelligence agencies that are really our true shadow government, that are running these These operations in order to be able to have blackmailable politicians or going out there and finding people who are already corrupt, like Bill Clinton, people who are like Dennis Hastert on the Republican side, and putting them in places of leadership.
	But also being able to blackmail them and other people, draw them into the net.
	Think about what these intelligence agencies are capable of doing.
	They don't care at all about the abuse of children.
	The abuse of children is just a means for them to be able to blackmail these politicians.
	They really don't care what happens to them.
	So as one person, one witness said, they were asked, did Jeffrey ever talk to you about Bill Clinton?
	He said, yeah, he said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls.
	So that's one thing that's come out.
	But of course, some of the other names on the list.
	George Mitchell, who is a leader in the Democrat Party.
	Bill Richardson, very high in the Democrat Party, who's also an ambassador.
	He ran for president. Marvin Minsky.
	Marvin Minsky, I had to look him up.
	I didn't know who he was.
	He ran the Artificial Intelligence Lab at MIT. Another satanic operation, in my opinion.
	And then in part of this transcript that's made public, a person was being asked about names and people that they had been involved with.
	And so she names some of these people I just mentioned, and then also said, and a guy that owns a hotel, a really large hotel chain, and I can't remember which hotel it was.
	Well, later on in these documents of Virginia Guthrie, Said Thomas Pritzker was one of the clients, if you will.
	And, of course, it's the Pritzker family that has the hotel chain, the Hyatt, and he is the one who runs that.
	But the governor of Illinois is also a Pritzker.
	As I've shown, his cousin or something, who looks exactly like him, is a man who dresses up as a woman.
	The Pritzker family that runs the Hyatt Hotels has done an incredible amount of funding to these institutions that are pushing the transgender pedophilia.
	So why would it be a surprise to find these guys as part of Jeffrey Epstein's operation?
	At one point where they're pressing her for names, I think it was Virginia Guthrie who said this, she said that she had a book of names.
	She'd been keeping these names.
	But she just wanted to put it behind us.
	At one point, she burned the book that had the names of people she had been trafficked to.
	She said it was over 300 pages of names.
	Pages of names.
	Truly is amazing.
	And so, as Zero Hedge is reporting about this, one account on Twitter has about a quarter of a million followers.
	Zero Hedge says, what about Trump?
	And this person says, Trump is cleared by the Epstein-List dump.
	No, what it was is it was one person that they were interviewing who was named Miniger.
	She said that they asked her, did you have anything to do with Trump?
	She said no. That doesn't mean that others didn't, who were not there to be asked.
	And it doesn't mean that Trump is now innocent of depravity.
	It means that he's not guilty in this particular situation, with this particular woman.
	And I think one of the most amazing things that's come out of this so far is the fact that they had an NPA. You've heard of the NDA, a non-disclosure agreement?
	Well, the government, the U.S. government, entered into an NPA with Jeffrey Epstein.
	A non-prosecution agreement.
	That's right. They agreed that they would not prosecute him.
	And this is something that happened even as there was public knowledge of this trafficking that was done by Jeffrey Epstein.
	They still entered into a non-prosecution agreement with him.
	And I have to ask, is this why Alex Acosta, the prosecutor, gave him such a sweetheart deal?
	Was it because somebody took him aside and said, hey, the CIA, the federal government, has got a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein?
	Was that what was going on? Because, as I said before, even as he pled guilty to some minor charges, he was essentially given the kind of treatment that Otis, the town drunk, got from Andy Griffith.
	You can let yourself in at night, sleep it off there, and then you can, you know, here's the keys to the jail.
	And that's what they did with Jeffrey Epstein.
	And is that why that non-prosecution agreement, is that why Alex Acosta did that for him?
	And is that why Trump made Alex Acosta a person in his cabinet?
	You don't prosecute Jeffrey Epstein because the government says so?
	And if you go along with that, you don't buck that, then we'll give you a cabinet position?
	Apparently so.
	I'm sure it's just a coincidence, don't you think?
	I'm sure there wasn't anything.
	Because we're talking about Trump.
	He couldn't do anything wrong, right?
	We know that he's the one who's going to save us.
	Jeffrey Epstein told his brother, if I revealed what I know about both candidates, the 2016 election would have to be canceled, he said.
	Who are the two candidates?
	Trump and Hillary.
	So you want to say, Zero Hedge, that Trump's not guilty?
	Or you want to say he's innocent?
	Not innocent. Not innocent.
	Jeffrey Epstein had information on Trump and the Clintons that was so incendiary that it would have up into the 2016 election, if made possible, according to his younger brother.
	He said, here's a direct quote, his younger brother said.
	If I said what I know about both candidates, they'd have to cancel the election.
	That's what Jeffrey told me in 2016, said Mark Epstein to the New York Post yesterday.
	However, he would not elaborate.
	He says, well, my brother never told me any of the details about this.
	Both candidates were known to have moved within Epstein's circle, directly or indirectly.
	You see, Hillary and Trump Traveled in the same satanic circles.
	You were given two sides of the same coin, folks, in 2016.
	And in all the important ways, what they're offering you right now between Trump and Biden is two sides of the same coin.
	Trump flew on Epstein's private jet seven times in the 90s.
	Hillary is not known to have consorted with Epstein personally.
	I guess maybe Ghislaine Maxwell was more her type.
	Bill and Epstein visited each other numerous times over the years, including Epstein making at least 17 visits to the White House.
	Clinton also traveled across around the world on Epstein's jet making trips to Europe, Asia and Africa in 2002 and 2003 after he was no longer president.
	So Epstein goes 17 times to the White House and then they start going around the world on the Lolita Express because of all the young women involved.
	Maxwell... Now jailed in Florida, said that Epstein had videotapes showing Trump and Clinton in compromising positions with women.
	She said, if you get the tapes on Trump, you have to do Clinton also.
	In a 2016 interview.
	But of course, no tapes have surfaced.
	Clinton is not expected to be implicated in any illegal activity.
	Of course not. Of course not, said ABC News.
	And ABC News says he has never been accused of any wrongdoing in relation to anyone in Epstein's orbit.
	Well, it wouldn't matter if he had.
	He was credibly accused of violent behavior to women, of rape to women, credibly accused.
	And Ken Starr, who went on to defend Jeffrey Epstein, didn't bother to look into any of that and did not implicate him.
	In any of the sexual abuse or rape that he was accused of by many different women.
	Isn't that amazing? You know, when you look at the Me Too thing, women making these accusations and they didn't even have to have a lot of women making the same types of allegations about somebody to end their career throughout all this Me Too stuff.
	And yet, you had this group of women who all said the same thing about Bill Clinton.
	Now, he violently beat them and raped them, and nothing ever happened to them by Ken Starr, who also defended Jeffrey Epstein.
	Clinton has denied ever visiting the island.
	So what? Does he have to go to the island to get involved in this pedophilia stuff?
	Could it happen on the plane?
	Could it happen at Jeffrey's house in New York, his mansion in New York?
	Could it happen in the White House?
	Well, of course! We know what he was doing in the Oval Office with Monica Lewinsky.
	He doesn't need to go to the island.
	That is not an excuse for him, and it's not an excuse for Trump either.
	Mark Epstein, who believes his brother was murdered and did not commit suicide, doesn't expect anything to come out of the files.
	He says, it's not my job to defend my brother.
	That's not what I'm here for. The only thing I'm looking for is the circumstances of his murder.
	Well, I'm not even convinced that he was killed.
	They had a non-prosecution agreement with him.
	Was he in jail because they had to show they were doing something?
	Did they... Get him out of there?
	I don't know. We're going to take a quick break.
	Tony Arterman is going to join us, and when we come back, we'll talk a little bit more about this and some other news, but I want to get into what is happening financially this year, because there's been some big moves in the last few days, and there's going to be even more of those coming up, so we'll be right back.
	Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles!
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
	The Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
	The Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, joining us now is Tony Arterman of Wise Wolf Gold, and Tony's been a longtime guest host.
	He guest hosted on Friday for us.
	I really do appreciate that.
	And he's also been a long-term supporter of this program.
	He's set up davidknight.gold to take you to wisewolf.gold.
	And, you know, Tony, thanks for joining us, and Happy New Year!
	Happy New Year to you, David. Thanks for having me back.
	I really enjoyed hosting for you.
	It's not something that's easily done, and I gain new respect for you every time I do it.
	Well, thank you. You know, I gain new respect for you every time I see somebody else talking about how they're going to sell it at first Costco, now Walmart, how they're going to sell gold.
	And it's like, we do it until we're out of it, and then you can't get it anymore.
	And it's like, that doesn't happen with you, because you're going to nail it.
	Some prices are lower. We have lower prices, but you can't get it.
	I hope you'll come back.
	Yeah, that's right.
	And so it's really easy to do that type of thing.
	But you can lock in a price and you can get the stuff for people.
	But it's not just Costco and Walmart.
	We're seeing this in the British Royal Mint.
	They said it had record gold demand in 2023.
	They said it was 7% higher than the previous year.
	And this article from Kitco...
	They're saying a lot of global investors continue to move in precious metal to weather the volatile financial markets.
	And you know, when you look at it, Bitcoin has jumped up really big at the end of the year because they thought there's going to be a new Bitcoin ETF. And then that was rumors about that from Bloomberg saying, yeah, yeah, it's going to be approved by the government.
	And then some more rumors from somebody else saying, no, the government's not going to approve it.
	So it's like jumping back and forth, you know, from like 40 to 45 and back down to 40 or whatever.
	It truly is amazing to see how volatile all the markets are like that.
	And yet, you know, gold, that's one of the things I like about gold.
	It's just kind of, you know, it's solid like we've talked about over the century.
	You know, it's been solid, not like cash, not like the stock market, not like any of these other things.
	It just is there as a store of value.
	Well, sometimes there's a benefit from the powers that be suppressing the price of gold and silver along the way.
	It actually does benefit the public.
	It has kept the prices down, especially silver.
	And we can get into that. Historically, silver is just extremely cheap right now.
	I think cheaper than it's ever been in history, or it should be anyway.
	And I think that you're right.
	You're seeing global demand tick up from the public.
	And that's just really because people are starting to see it's an open secret that a lot of the bullion contracts, the ETFs, the stocks themselves, they don't contain actual gold.
	And when people start looking around and saying, well, what about my currency?
	You know, isn't my currency backed by something?
	Absolutely not. And you lose purchasing power every single day.
	I read something the other day.
	I'm always finding out, and this is my wheelhouse, I'm always studying the past, looking at history, looking at currency, the monetary system.
	And I looked at this figure.
	When I was born, and it was 1979, I was born the day the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.
	Yeah. And I looked at the charts and there is 52 times more currency today than when I was born.
	52 times more currency in the world today since I was born.
	And you know, the United States dollar is now the oldest living fiat currency.
	That something is not talked about.
	When Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard in 1971, that created a fiat currency system and the rest of the world followed.
	But we are the oldest surviving Fiat currency right now, the average lifespan of a fiat currency is 26 years, and we're 50 years on.
	And again, that's not going to end well.
	All fiat currencies historically have gone to zero.
	So I think that in the public consciousness, even worldwide, we look at the Shanghai Exchange, the physical demand for gold is up there too.
	China does not export gold.
	There's something I think the Chinese government and the Chinese people know, especially what's coming in the In the years ahead, you know, we're in a fourth turning.
	We got new monetary systems are going to be in place.
	The BRICS nations are competing against the United States king dollar system and the petrodollar.
	So we're going to see all sorts of shakeups.
	I think that's just starting to catch with the public.
	Again... When you go and look at the actual supply, if there was a big mover, say like an Elon Musk, he could do this with petty cash.
	The Hunts did it in the 1970s.
	But there's something to silver, especially physical silver, David.
	Nobody touches it.
	None of the whales come in and actually take silver and re-evaluate it to what it's supposed to be.
	They just let it kind of sit there in the big banks.
	J.P. Morgan right now is the largest holder of physical silver in the world.
	They would have a vested interest in In getting the price up, except for the fact that they're still accumulating.
	So that's what I think, you know, my audience and your audience, people, I'm not giving you investment advice, but take a look at the physical markets versus the paper markets.
	And I think a lot of people have, and they're calling the bluff of the elites and the casino stock market, and they're buying physical.
	And it's not only just a hedge against inflation, but like you and I talk about all the time.
	It is really the only protection for your wealth and your hard work against central bank digital currency.
	The twin thread is inflation and loss of purchasing power, and the other is the surveillance state and central bank digital currency.
	That's right. And this article talking about what they're doing and the British Mint, they said recent geopolitical and economic uncertainty are driving this alongside strong central bank gold buying.
	It's kept precious metal markets elevated, but they don't mention the CBDC. And I think a lot of people are very concerned about that.
	They said they have more people making investments in gold than did during the lockdown crisis.
	Temporary boom of investment in 2020.
	And they said 77% of the people are buying fractional ounces of gold.
	They're breaking it down.
	They're getting smaller pieces of that.
	That's one of the things that I like that you have is the fractional, what do you call it?
	It's like little pieces of gold, silver that you can break off that make it kind of a fraction of an ounce.
	Yeah, this is something that Kenzie helped me come up with in the Wolfpack.
	When you join Wolfpack, especially the middle to higher tiers, we always put a little bit of gold in there.
	And we're able to do that because I buy the sheets of 100.
	They're called Combi bars.
	They're about can be Combi.
	And they have little gram bars that are breakable.
	We'll buy them in bulk by the sheet, and I'll have my crew put on gloves, and we take them off, and we clip them out so we're able to save you a premium.
	Like if you went on and just bought a gram online, you're going to pay higher and pay shipping.
	But we all include that in the wolf pack.
	So we just use the crew to, you know, tediously go in and take off the grand pieces.
	But a gram of gold is a great way to start getting gold.
	And we do that.
	Gold backs are another way.
	I'm not I would put physical gold bullion ahead of that.
	But gold backs are another thing that we do.
	You know, those are the 24 karat gold notes that are accepted in places like New Hampshire and Wyoming and Utah and other places.
	And we get those direct from the source and we put them in wolf pack.
	Because, again, that's just another with those type of currencies and what's what is actual money is once you start using that, it's very addictive.
	Because to me, if I see a stack of cash because of what I deal with, I know how liquid gold and silver are.
	I'm going to take the gold and silver over cash any day.
	Because I know, at least I can watch the markets.
	I can see my purchasing power remaining with my gold or silver.
	I'm outside of the system.
	I don't need a bank. I don't need to transact this.
	So I really like having physical gold and silver any day over cash.
	Yeah, there's...
	The importance of having the stuff in your physical possession is a really key thing.
	And I think even when we look at what is going on with Bitcoin and this back and forth about whether or not the government is going to approve this new financial instrument, which in itself is another one of these derivatives.
	You're going to get a derivative on a digital currency.
	I was like, I think I would rather have the physical stuff there.
	And, you know, whether you're talking about silver, even with the silver, you can break that down into smaller and smaller quantities so that people have something they can actually trade with.
	When you're talking about the gold-backed stuff, you're talking about paper currency that has actual gold, physical gold, interwoven into it.
	So it has intrinsic value.
	It's not just a A fiat paper, but it looks like some kind of paper currency, but it's actually got gold in it, right?
	That's exactly right.
	It's real money because it has gold in it.
	And our dollar identifies as money, but it's not actual money, the U.S. dollar.
	It's transcurrency, right?
	It's transcurrency.
	That's exactly right.
	And the question is, what is it going to transform into?
	One guy is saying, Mike McGlone, says he thinks gold is going to go to $3,000 in 2024.
	That's way higher than I've seen from other people.
	A lot of people have said it's going to go up to $2,200, $2,300.
	He's saying that, again, because he said we have...
	We're going to see a great reset, he said, that's worthy of the biggest pump and dump we have ever seen in history.
	And part of that is what is happening with the fiat currency and the fact that they have run us up into $34 trillion worth of debt.
	I was talking about that yesterday.
	It's absolutely amazing when you look at how much the interest is going to be on the debt.
	And who knows what the interest rates are going to be.
	They're just kind of guessing at what the long-term interest rates are going to be, but it's going to be trillions of dollars in just a couple of years, interest that we pay on the debt, bigger than most of the government programs out there combined.
	I like looking at the historical charts.
	It's where I get a lot of my understanding of where we are now.
	I try to look into the past.
	If you go to 1913, 1914, I think the debt of the U.S. was around a billion dollars total.
	And again, they enacted the Federal Reserve.
	Woodrow Wilson puts us in the war to end all wars, you know, to make the world a safer democracy.
	At the end of that, our debt was five billion dollars.
	So you needed the Federal Reserve in order to get that kind of monetary expansion.
	And I think that was the centerpiece.
	The key that they needed to get us on the international stage was the Federal Reserve.
	But you fast forward so many years, again, we'll go back to 1980.
	It's a very pivotal year.
	The debt of the U.S. was just under $1 trillion.
	Now, we see the headline on Drudge yesterday, debt disgrace, 34 trillion and climbing.
	It now takes a trillion dollars a year to service the debt.
	120% of our GDP to debt ratio.
	This is unsustainable.
	No country, no civilization has ever had this type of debt.
	And this is global. It's malignant.
	It's in everything. It's in all of our financial systems.
	There's a reason why the central banks are buying gold at a record pace.
	They're preparing for, and again, I don't know, where do I get all this phraseology?
	The Great Reset. I mean, they come out and they go, I'm going to owe nothing.
	I'm going to be happy. There's going to be this Great Reset.
	They've been talking about it for years.
	I talked about it on my show in 2019.
	You know, this was still floating.
	This was long before COVID-1984.
	And it was just a conspiracy theory.
	It was just a conspiracy theory.
	But it was actually a conspiracy that they'd already hatched and were bragging about, right?
	Yeah. That's right.
	I'm a conspiracy analyst.
	Yeah. As Gore Vidal would say, I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
	You know, it's funny. I don't want to deviate too much, David, but I was on this line of logic because you were speaking about the Epstein client list.
	You know, you have a lot of adventures in gold and silver.
	My first shop was in San Antonio and I had a radio show.
	I started my radio show back in San Antonio when I started Wise Wolf.
	About a year into it, I didn't have any crew.
	I didn't have any... No, it was just me and my dog.
	And I get some interesting clients in San Antonio and This older, affluent lady came in.
	She had a big bag of jewelry, high-end jewelry.
	A gold dealer, when you look at that, and I want to sell this, I'm like, great, I'm going to be able to buy groceries this week.
	I was looking at a big bag of all sorts of gold watches, necklaces, diamond rings, and it was an amazing amount of product.
	So I'm going through it, and I'm verifying everything.
	She's very kind, very nice, and talking to me.
	And then she says, and this was just after Epstein was arrested, before he didn't kill himself, right?
	This is right, I think, the day after.
	And I had the news going on in the background.
	And she said, you know, Jeffrey was my next-door neighbor.
	Yeah. And in New York.
	And she goes, you know, over the years I've noticed these stories about him and she said he was very odd.
	I've been in his house many, many times and she got really quiet and she said, you know what?
	It's really strange.
	She said, when I went into his house...
	When I was looking at his, he had like a delivery area in his closet.
	She goes, he had the same outfit over and over and over again.
	I never could quite, he was so kind, but I always thought that was so weird.
	He wore the same thing and he had the same thing in sets.
	Over and over and over again.
	And I thought that was really interesting.
	This lady was telling me the truth.
	And I started thinking about when you were talking about it.
	It's hard to imagine a world where Epstein's run around with impunity if you don't have a fiat currency system.
	I mean, it's a symptom of that.
	I know everything tracks back to the money, but between Donald Rumsfeld not being able to track $2.3 trillion on September 10th, or you get these rogue, weird intelligence people running around and able to blackmail and all the stuff that they do, we don't really know the extent of it.
	But we do know that if you had to account for currency at some level, that you don't have Jeffrey Epstein's.
	Not really. I mean, there's always evil in the world.
	There's always that. But there's so much.
	Everything is magnified.
	And I'm bringing this up because this is where my mind goes.
	Everything is magnified by the fake of our fiat currency system and how they're able to hide things, get away with things.
	I mean, look at the money that we've given Ukraine.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. In a fiscally sane United States, because that's the thing, we were in a shadow of being fiscally sane for a long time.
	We had, you know, old members of Congress and the Senate.
	We're still looking at, like, we had to be on the Bretton Woods system or gold standard.
	That lasted up until the 90s.
	But slowly, I think the powers that be figured out we don't even have to do anything anymore.
	I mean, Dick Cheney came out and said deficits don't matter.
	Remember that? He said deficits don't matter.
	So now we're in this massive bubble, the everything bubble, and it's going to pop.
	I don't want it to happen, but that's where we are, and it's looking for a pin.
	So we're in a fourth turning.
	There is going to be a massive shift and change in the way that business is done, the way that currencies are transacted, and who runs the show.
	I'm not betting on king dollar.
	So that, again, setting the stage for what you and I talk about, what's the dollar going to transition into?
	What's going to transition into central bank digital currency?
	It's not going to zero, folks.
	It's going to digital. Right now, we've got an opportunity to prepare for that.
	I think if we build that and we network and we stay outside of that system, we're going to fare a lot better than the general public.
	I think that's really interesting what she said about him.
	Do you remember Jim Varney and he had the Ernest character?
	Was it Ernest P. Worrell or something like that?
	And in one of his movies, I remember there's a closet full of this t-shirt and vest thing that he wore, you know, just full of the same thing over and over again.
	Right. Which is really kind of funny because you always used to see that.
	Remember, for years, Bonanza was on for what?
	You know, more than a decade.
	And all of the characters in Bonanza, you know, the three sons and the father, they always wore the same thing every day.
	They never changed clothes for 10 years.
	It is really kind of a funny thing.
	But your conversation with her...
	I guess you didn't ask her if she ever heard any screams, right?
	No, I just let her talk.
	And she was reserved for the most part.
	But when she got a glimpse of his face on the television, I could see that she was thinking about it.
	And then she told me about her knowing Jeffrey Epstein, being his next-door neighbor, going in his home.
	And then she just got really quiet and said...
	No, it was odd that he just had the same outfit.
	Like, she just found that just to be, you know, so out of place.
	But so was he.
	It's like a conversation I had with a woman in a store that she was running.
	I've mentioned this before. And it was just like a little knick-knack shop.
	And Karen was looking around at it.
	And she was there.
	And I was standing there.
	And so she wanted to talk.
	And she told me how she and her husband had set up this shop and how they retired from the military.
	And she had been part of this investigation with all the missing money in the Pentagon.
	And she said, you know, it's really something.
	She said, I was lucky I got out of there.
	Just happened to get out of there before that plane went right into the office where I was working.
	And she said, you know, we found so much money that was missing, and we had congressmen who were retiring and high military officials who were retiring rather than, you know, facing the music with all this kind of stuff.
	And she said, yeah, I got out of there just a couple of minutes.
	I said, well, where do you listen?
	Where do you get your news from?
	It's like, you really can't put two and two together with all of this stuff?
	You don't understand what really happened there?
	And like you, I just sat there and listened to what she had to say.
	It truly was amazing. And she had no idea, would not suspect anything that's dodgy at all about the fact that it just flew right into the window where they were investigating all the missing trillions of dollars.
	It's frustrating, because people do get so close to the truth, and you're hoping that they even maybe accidentally fall over into the truth, and figure it out, but sometimes they never do.
	Yeah, you're trying to lead them along like the guy in Monty Python, okay?
	So if she floats, she is made of wood, is what they come up with.
	So it's like, no, no, that's not it.
	That's not where we're going with this.
	You see that all the time with people.
	It's just amazing that they can't connect the dots on this stuff.
	Well, we're talking about all the different, the volatility and everything.
	I thought this was funny. This came out on Monday, talking about Bitcoin blasting past $45,000 as they were speculating about a spot ETF for it.
	And one person said, so here's where we are in the CoinTucky Derby as of this morning.
	I call it the Cointucky Derby because it is like gambling.
	It's like the stock market on a lot of these things.
	And that's what, you know, when you look at gold, it's different in the sense that even though you see the price fluctuating, as you pointed out so many times, it's the price of the dollar that is fluctuating because gold keeps its purchasing power.
	Over the centuries, it's kept it.
	Absolutely. And again, gold really hasn't gone up in total value in the last 100 years.
	I mean, you can buy the same amount of crude oil, same amount of land, a nice suit.
	There's always that comparison from 100 years ago.
	And again, there was no inflation in the early history of the United States, even from the 19th century into 1933.
	And if you were We're good to go.
	Because just like Henry Ford said, if people understood the banking system, there'd be a revolution in the morning.
	I mean, people realize the enormity of the scam, they would be outraged, but nobody teaches them that.
	So we just go on and act like things are normal, that things go up in price.
	I like the Bitcoin ecosystem.
	I've been in it since 2016.
	I buy a little bit of Bitcoin every day.
	I have it set to automatic. I don't buy many other cryptocurrencies, not that there aren't some good ones, especially the privacy coins, but it's more speculative.
	I think Bitcoin in and of itself is a theory, and we're going to see how that plays out.
	It's creating its own parallel economy and currency.
	I don't know how that's going to fare against gold.
	I like the physical, physical gold and silver.
	That's what I always go back to.
	That is my number one.
	But if I'm looking to the future, I think it's really exciting to see a lot of the younger generation and people that are very smart getting in and building the Bitcoin network and other crypto networks.
	That's why on my podcast, I have the Wise Wolf Gold and Crypto Show.
	It's gold and crypto because I think these are two Gold, silver, and crypto are an answer to the evil.
	And it is, just call it what it is.
	There's an evil in fiat currency in the Luciferian bankster note system.
	I really believe that.
	So I think any kind of innovation is good.
	It's built on a lie. And when they go to the digital, the crypto...
	The central bank digital currency, when they go to that, again, they're getting away from proof of work.
	And it's just what they call proof of stake, which is to say, I'm the authority.
	This is what I say it's worth.
	And I don't have to do anything to create this.
	You know, when they talk about it, mining again, you know, Bitcoin, they're making a reference back to something like gold and silver that you actually have to mine.
	But with the crypto, with the CBDC, they're just going to say, well, this is what it's worth because I say so.
	And you're now at a digital fiat currency.
	But I think, as you point out, it's been a very long time that this fraudulent Federal Reserve thing has been going on.
	We just had the 110th anniversary of its creation.
	And when we look at the fourth turning...
	Usually, 70, 80 years, these institutions are hopelessly corrupt, and people understand that they're hopelessly corrupt.
	There doesn't seem to be that much of an understanding.
	A lot of people have been listening to Ron Paul over the years.
	They understand about the Federal Reserve.
	They want to end the Federal Reserve.
	They want to audit the Federal Reserve.
	But that's still not the majority of the population.
	So it remains to be seen what's going to happen with that.
	I think they're going to escape that kind of audit.
	I think they're going to escape the death sentence.
	I think they're going to transform themselves into a CBDC. But looking ahead, you know, this election year, Trump is out there saying that if he's not elected, we're going to go into a 1929-style Great Depression.
	I kind of think we're going to do that anyway.
	Certainly he acted like Rumsfeld and like the Democrats who push modern monetary theory that deficits don't matter because he started kicking off this multi-trillion dollar welfare programs with a lockdown.
	Pray tell, Donald, what are you going to do different than you did for four years?
	But when he was running, I thought, wow, this is great.
	I love this rhetoric.
	I mean, he was going after the stock market.
	It's a bubble. It's disgusting.
	There's no value. He's going after the Federal Reserve and needs to be audited.
	He said these words, and I thought, wow, we're really going to get into something.
	There's some stats on Trump that are just so heartbreaking and disappointing.
	You're talking about a once in five generation chance or something to really make a difference, and maybe ever.
	And he only had $16,000 that were donated across the board from hedge funds.
	16,000.
	Hillary Clinton had millions upon millions, but he owed nothing to Wall Street.
	Yet he hired all of Wall Street, and Wall Street is just a continuum of the ESG, you know, again, the bankster system.
	It has nothing to do with real markets or real value.
	It's... Socialism for the rich and free enterprise for the poor, as Gore Vidal would say.
	I think we're, again, it doesn't matter.
	The election, this is just for us to understand the intel of what the powers that be, the selection process, really.
	I don't want to be too cynical on it because I do think there's a lot of local elections and things that will be very important this season.
	So I don't want to discourage that.
	But I'm so tuned out of the national politics at this point.
	Neither party are actually getting into the issues that matter, that truly matter.
	That's right. Yeah, that's right.
	And it's kind of like, you know, fool me once, shame on you.
	Fool me twice, shame on me.
	When we look at all the things that were said, and again, there was always a hope.
	He didn't have any public record.
	He'd never run for public office, so he'd never had to really do anything about these things.
	So, you know, whatever he had to say, people would say, well, Well, maybe he's really going to do that, or maybe he'll be independent enough to do it.
	But as you point out, he brings in Gary Cohen, who was head of Goldman Sachs, and they gave him over $200 million as a golden parachute so that he could go into the Trump administration.
	He puts in Steve Mnuchin from Goldman Sachs in as his Secretary of the Treasury, and on and on.
	And so from the very beginning of that, you know, when I looked at that, I remember when Trump was running, one of the things that gave me started my spidey sense going, if you want to put it that way, was when I was looking it up, it was an article that was a few years old from Vanity Fair.
	And they were talking about Trump and how he conducted himself with society when he bought Mar-a-Lago and why he bought Mar-a-Lago and how there was the people who were there said, yeah, it's almost like he didn't really want to have us over, you know, for these parties and everything.
	And his wife would come in and she would be so obsequious to everybody and setting everybody down.
	And then he would show up late.
	He would come in and set the head of the table.
	He wouldn't engage anybody in conversation, and then he'd get up a little bit and leave.
	It's just like, you know, you're here to see me, and, you know, that type of thing.
	And I thought, if that's the situation here, then we're going to have him doing that with all the Wall Street people and all the military-industrial complex, and that's exactly what happened and all that.
	But when we look at this, we talked about CBDC. And there's a Daily Skeptic article talking about debanking in the UK because that's happened a great deal.
	You're aware of everybody as of what happened to Nigel Farage.
	But they point out that it's much bigger than that.
	They're talking about how you've got people who are being banned from sports stadiums because they didn't like what they had to say on social media about transgenderism and that type of thing.
	And it is pervasive what is happening there.
	And that's the way CBDC is going to be used to punish us.
	If that's the only currency that we have and the only thing that we have that we can negotiate with people in another economy, we're going to be trapped in this type of situation, I think.
	Well, it's a solution looking for a crisis.
	Right now, nobody wants CBDC. And they tried this in Nigeria because they thought, well, this would be a good proving ground, as you know, because the Nigerians love Bitcoin.
	And they gave them central bank digital currency, and it's a flop.
	Nobody wants it. So at this time, I think what we need to be aware of is that they have to summon the crisis.
	It has to be a problem-reaction solution for us to adopt it.
	Again, we have to ask.
	You have to let the devil in.
	And I think that's what's going to be around the corner for us.
	That's why we have to stay vigilant, because they're going to roll this out.
	It's going to be... This is how we either save the currency, or if you're a real patriot, if you really love America, if you want to help your neighbor, we have to stand strong.
	And it could come from a series of crises, whether geopolitically, it could be war, it could be currency wars, it could be a combination of everything.
	And I think that's more of the fourth turning.
	You mentioned about every 80 years or so, and you marked it at 72, different history cycles.
	But we have the Revolutionary War and the beginning of the United States.
	You had the Continental War.
	You know, the continental currency, and that's where you get worthless as a continental, because that paper currency, they tried to peg it to be equal in one Spanish silver dollar.
	And, of course, the early government printed more than there was than they had dollars to circulate.
	So, again, that was a failed currency.
	And finally, you had the bimetallic standard.
	That lasted throughout the Civil War, and then Lincoln had the greenbacks.
	If you recall, there was only two presidents in history that ever put notes directly out from the Treasury.
	One was Abraham Lincoln and the other was JFK. They were both shot in the head in public.
	I don't know if Lincoln, that's something Jim Mars noticed.
	But again, did Lincoln upset the bankers?
	I think there's evidence to show that he did.
	He's not my favorite historical figure.
	If you really want to know about Lincoln, you should read Don Jeffries' work.
	Anything that Don Jeffries has written about Abraham Lincoln, you should definitely go and read.
	But he had the greenback, and then we had a gold standard.
	That was the other fourth turning in American history after the Civil War, David.
	And we had, again, finally setting not a bimetallic system, but we had a gold standard in 1879, and that's where you get, you know, that eventually caused the populist revolt, William Jennings Bryan, the cross of gold speech, because we had such strong currency.
	I mean, again, they wanted to put free silver into the market to bring the purchasing power of the dollar down so the farmers could easily get out of debt.
	And again, that was the pushback.
	But you didn't have another change until the next fourth turning, which was...
	The Breton Woods system in the end of World War II, 1944, that's where you get the IMF and the World Bank, and the dollar is $35 an ounce for gold, and that lasted until 71.
	So again, we're entering another phase.
	What is that going to look like?
	Well, I definitely think there's going to be a ditching of the dollar system itself.
	The world doesn't want it.
	The world is tired of being bullied, and again, they want to be able to access their funds.
	Again, there's calls to give the frozen assets that the U.S. has of Russia's directly to Ukraine.
	Yeah. Right now.
	I mean, we're giving them all the reasons in the world to move away from our system, and ultimately, it's self-inflicted wounds.
	Yeah. Well, I agree.
	And when you look at this, and you're going through the history of all this, and you understand that you've got these robber barons, these big banks, and all the rest of the people who want to become fabulously wealthy.
	But it was different then than it is now.
	Now these people who, they're not content to just be the super and uber wealthy people.
	They hate humanity so much that they want to kill us.
	And they want to take everything from us.
	I mean, we look at the micromanagement of the Biden administration, all the regulations that came out at the beginning of this year as things are transferring over, how they're trying to get rid of everything.
	Ceiling fans, your ranges, all this other kind of stuff.
	And to push you into something that they control with the electric grid.
	And that's what I think we're really looking at with the CBDC.
	Not only do they want to kill us, but they want to control those who survive.
	And there's just no limit to it.
	When you look at how people are being hit, as Toby Young and the UK talks about it with Daily Skeptic, he was hit with being banned from PayPal, and they made a big deal out of it, so they brought him back.
	But yeah, I was kicked out of PayPal back in May of 2021.
	And when you look at some of the stories that he's talking about, again, not letting people get into stadiums because you said something about transgenderism.
	He said we need to talk about people not just being debanked, but being de-stadiumed.
	You know, kicked out of even going to a game that is there.
	And then he takes it to one more example.
	And it was a woman who was in the hospital in the UK for a life-saving operation, and they canceled her life-saving operation because there was a person there, a man dressed as a woman who was a nurse, and she said, I don't want this transgender nurse involved in my intimate care.
	And so they said, all right, well, then we just won't give you the operation.
	Kicked her out. This is going to be used against us, unlike what we saw with J.P. Morgan, as evil as he was.
	This is going to be used by these people to shut down our speech, to shut down our religion, for religious persecution, for all these other things.
	This is why I'm so adamant about being outside of the financial system, to some extent, with gold and silver.
	There's going to be a way that, you know, as long as you've got some kind of an escape That is ultimately there.
	I think that is the key thing, because they really are going to weaponize this for all kinds of persecution, political, religious, and everything else that they can think of.
	Well, the only way to stand up to them and reign them in is to walk away from their system.
	That's right. It's what empowers them.
	That's right. And what was that Paul Harvey bit, if I was the devil?
	Yeah. I think people underestimate the evil, David.
	I mean, sometimes I even do.
	Yeah. But, you know, again, if you ask yourself, Okay, let's say I remove my love of God, and I remove my love of family, and I remove my love of anything, and I'm devoid of all that, and I'm a multi-multi-billionaire, maybe I'm a trillionaire.
	What would I do to keep my power?
	Well, you do exactly what they're doing.
	You're making it impossible for anybody to ever compete with you.
	You're kicking the ladder down.
	You're trying to stop the game.
	You have all the chips. You don't want anybody to ever, ever challenge your power.
	You'd unify with governments.
	You'd unify with treasuries, unify with banks, and you would control people.
	You would pit them against each other, never ever letting them look upon you as maybe being the source of their ills.
	You're never in question because you're not seen.
	You put a dummy out front.
	You get the people to fight over which dummy they're going to get.
	And I think that's what's happening right now in this country.
	Nobody's really talking about what we're actually facing, the real problems.
	So I think, again, I think we're seeing history play out.
	I don't think that... I don't think that they're necessarily going to win this game of central bank digital currency and total enslavement unless we allow it, unless we adopt it, unless we fail at getting the word out.
	But again, this is our challenge.
	This is why we're here. Yeah.
	Oh, yeah. Absolutely. I agree.
	Well, tell us a little bit about what's going on at Wise Wolf now.
	Anything you particularly want to tell us that's going on, any specials or other things that are happening there?
	Well, I'm working on several programs for Wolfpack.
	I'm so proud of the Wolf Cub for the kids.
	We have more and more of those sign up over the holidays.
	Yesterday, Melissa had sent me a note.
	She said, can you give a message to the Cubs as Wise Wolf?
	I wrote them about honor your elders.
	We're glad you're part of the pack.
	We're going to learn a lot about what's real and what's fake.
	Especially in money.
	Remember the golden rule.
	The real golden rule is treat others as you want to be treated.
	It's more valuable than gold.
	That's the message that we have.
	We're not in love with gold and silver, but we like the fact that we can exchange it and we can help people.
	It's a reflection of our hard work.
	That's the message we've got in Wolfpack.
	We're getting more members every day.
	I've got a promo code 1776 for free constitutional silver, which is anything before 1965, and your quarters, dimes, half dollars, and dollars.
	So we're giving those away.
	Right now, we added Zen Wolf, and I'll be...
	Finalizing some of that. That's the latest package.
	I think it's the final. A lot of people were getting multiple memberships, and I thought, well, I'll do one last tier.
	So Zen is the ultimate tier?
	Zen is the ultimate. It's the highest level for a subscription.
	But we've got that.
	And I also wanted people to know, you know, we've still got an easy program to roll over existing IRAs and 401ks.
	If you want to get into physical metals, not paper stocks or anything that is an ETF, We make it really easy.
	You can go through davidknight.gold on that.
	And just direct purchases. It's just the type of company that we're always looking for ways to make it easier for somebody with a small amount of money to get a good product.
	So that's one of the easiest ways is Wolfpack.
	And you don't have to have a membership.
	You can do some one-time purchases.
	They're fine with us, too. We'd love to have you recurring.
	But again, we do direct...
	No... No amount is too small.
	I will never be that dealer.
	We're expanding.
	We've got the two locations and we have more of an online presence.
	I think 2024 is going to be tumultuous, but we're looking forward to serving.
	Well, that's great, and it certainly is great to have you on our side.
	Appreciate all the wisdom that you bring to the program when you come on as a guest and for guest hosting.
	And I thank you for all your support, Tony.
	I really do appreciate it. And folks, I've known him for years, dealt with him for years, and it's very important to support people who are on our team, not the big Walmarts and other things like that.
	But again, you know, they're going to tell you what they've got in stock, and when they're out, they're out.
	It's a very different thing that they're doing.
	But the reason we mention it is because there is an awakening of people to understand this volatility that is out there and the risk that is out there and what is being done to the currency with the massive indebtedness and the quantitative easing.
	And, of course, that's all going to come back.
	And this next year quite a bit because of the election.
	You know, they're going to let loose all the modern monetary theory that they can throw at the election and see what sticks.
	So it's great having you on, Tony.
	Thank you so much. Again, davidknight.gold will take you to wisewolf.gold.
	Thank you, Tony. Appreciate it.
	Thank you, Dave. Have a good day.
	All right, folks, we're going to be right back.
	Stay with us. APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device.
	Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
	Music
	by Ben Thede Music by Ben
	Thede Music
	by Ben Thede Music by Ben Thede You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Wow.
	All right, welcome back. We had a couple of comments here.
	One of them, I think, came up right as we were going to break.
	We were talking about the Great Magnet that is really what is the foundation for the Great Reset, pulling people in, offering them free stuff.
	On Rumble, Radice Bro, thank you for the tip, says...
	A lot of benefit ads I've been delivering lately are in Spanish only.
	I'm not sure what you mean by benefit ads.
	I know that, and Karen and I were talking about this.
	We've never had this happen before on Pandora, the music service.
	We don't subscribe to it.
	We just listen to it for free.
	And so we were listening to some music and I've had several times now where I get ads that are completely in Spanish.
	And I'm thinking, you know, do they pay any attention to what I'm listening to here?
	Never listened to any Spanish music.
	As a matter of fact, when that came on, I was listening to a channel that I created that was just all English Christmas carols sung by, for the most part, you know, it understood that.
	When I pulled that up, it gave me a lot of songs that were sung by a boys' choir and, you know, backed up by orchestra.
	That type of stuff. It's like, why would they think that I would be...
	Speaking in Spanish, why are they sending that to me?
	So, yeah, I don't know what's going on with that, but really scratching my head.
	It's like, what are they doing?
	Do they not know?
	I mean, why would you give an ad to somebody in a language that they don't understand?
	They've got to know from what I'm listening to that I'm not about that.
	On Rumble, Chris told me, thank you very much for the tip as well.
	It says, blessings to the David Knight Show.
	Well, thank you. That is a real blessing.
	Let's talk a little bit about persecution.
	Because I do think that that's what's going to happen.
	I mean, when you look at what Toby Young was saying...
	So you got people kicked out of sporting events because of what they said on social media about LGBT. Or you got a woman who's denied an operation in a hospital because of what she says about the LGBT. You look at Victoria, Australia.
	You're not going to be allowed to pray if you pray for somebody to get out of this delusion of transgenderism.
	Oh, that's going to be banned and so forth.
	And so there is a real spirit of persecution that is already alive and well.
	So how do we respond to this?
	It's political, but understand that politics is downstream from religion.
	And so when we look at the people who are being put out there by the press, As people who are representing Christianity now, you know, the Christian nationalists, as they call them.
	That's the label that they came up with, and a lot of them have embraced that.
	There was an article over the holidays from a paper that was, it was a local paper, that is in the town where Nick Fuentes lives, up in Illinois.
	And they had a quote from him.
	It was an article criticizing him.
	It says, many call for peace on earth at the Christmas season, but Nick Fuentes is doing the opposite.
	He's pushing for the death penalty for non-Christians.
	Now that sounds like a mischaracterization, doesn't it?
	But they actually quote him. This is what he had to say.
	He said, so many of the people perpetrating the lies, the destruction of this country are evildoers.
	They are people who worship false gods.
	They are people who practice magic and rituals or whatever.
	More than anything, those people need to be, when we take power, they need to be given the death penalty.
	Well, that's where Nick Fuentes is coming from.
	But I've got to say, don't use the label of Christian nationalism to describe that.
	There's nothing Christian about what Fuentes just said there.
	Nothing. Can you imagine Peter, John, Paul, saying, you know, when we take over, we're going to kill all these people.
	Of course not. That's about as anti-Christian, anti-Christ as you can find.
	That kind of hatred.
	You can't imagine anything that is more anti-Christian.
	And yet, you find people like Nick Fuentes.
	They are chosen to be the avatars, the spokespersons, the representatives of Christians by the media.
	They push this very hard.
	As a matter of fact, this article was pushed by Drudge, just to show you how evil Christians are.
	Well, there's nothing at all Christian about this.
	And so he said in this that he was more concerned about such people than he was about non-whites and about mass migration.
	He said, this is God's country.
	This is Jesus' country.
	This is not the domain of atheists and devil-worshippers, perfidious Jews.
	This is Christ's country.
	Well, all I can say is that, again, if you've ever looked at the Bible, you would know that this is not something that would be remotely contemplated by people like Peter, John, or Paul.
	As a matter of fact, Paul said We talked about people who were evil, people who had done evil, and he lays out the category of all these different things, things that many of us would look at and say, well, that's just a little peccadillo.
	That's not anything that is serious.
	But God takes rebellion seriously.
	But he lays out all these different things, and he says, and such were some of you.
	Were some of you.
	But you were changed.
	You were washed. Right?
	And so that ought to be our answer to it.
	And we need to push back against this idea.
	I said the other day, I said, look, I have no problem with the guy who busted up the Baphomet statue in the Iowa State Capitol.
	I don't think we should be neutral.
	I don't think we should be subservient to people who pretend they've got a religion and they want to express it when they don't really have a real religion.
	We need to call it phony when it is phony.
	And it should never have been put up there.
	I don't have a problem with the guy knocking it down.
	But at the same time, we're not there to try to kill people.
	That's not what we're trying to do.
	We're not trying to force our religion on people.
	We know that God is capable of working with anybody.
	And that needs to be our reaction.
	And I think it's very important that we oppose people like Nick Fuentes and say, he doesn't speak for me.
	He doesn't speak for Christianity.
	In the same way that we would oppose the Ku Klux Klan and say, well, you know, they're out there burning crosses in people.
	It's only burning crosses.
	They don't speak for Christianity.
	They don't speak for the historical confederacy either with their flags.
	So I think we need to speak out against these type of people and say that that doesn't have anything to do with us.
	But, of course, you know, he was a favorite with Alex.
	When Alex was pushing the Stop the Steal, he had Nick Fuentes right there.
	Right there at his elbow, telling everybody, we've got to go.
	And so, when you look at this, that's the reason that they put people like this, in that position.
	That's the reason they lift up Alex on social media, is because of what they can, they can be the avatar of hate for the opposition.
	And they can lead people in a direction where they want to have a revolution, as I pointed out earlier.
	More than half the people want to have an anti-democratic, and of course they say democratic, but what they really mean is somebody doesn't really care what the rule of law is.
	It's just, you know, what I can get away with, what I can push on people.
	And we have to understand that persecution is coming, and that's one of the reasons why I focus on the CBDC aspects of it.
	We know it's going to be used for religious persecution.
	And take a look at Nigeria, for example.
	In Nigeria, we were just talking about it with Tony, how they tried to push through CBDC there.
	People there said, not going to have it.
	But one thing that is happening there is a government that is complicit and stands by as these radical Islamists are murdering Christians left and right.
	You've got a Christmas massacre that they decide because it's Christmas we're going to go in and kill Christians.
	More than 195 people killed, 10,000 people displaced, more than 1,000 homes burned down.
	That's the kind of Christmas that they had in Nigeria because of radical Islamists.
	Nigeria updated the death toll of the presumed jihadist massacre of Christians beginning on Christmas Eve.
	They updated it to 195 people on Thursday, warning that the arduous search for bodies in the bush continues and will likely add to the catastrophic number of lives lost.
	Members of the majority Muslim Fulani ethnic group went on a killing and pillaging rampage in the heart of the plateau beginning on Christmas Eve.
	It's an attempt by the Fulani to eradicate a Christian presence in Nigeria's Middle Belt region and to usurp its territory.
	The Middle Belt is a dividing line between Nigeria's majority Christian South and the majority Muslim North.
	Again, the North and South Division.
	But when you look at genocide, purging everybody out of a given area, that word was coined by a Jewish observer when he talked about what the Turks were doing to the Armenians in the early 20th century.
	Again, we're going to kill everybody if they stay or they can leave.
	And that is exactly what is happening in Nigeria.
	It is genocidal.
	And just like in Turkey, it is Islam against Christianity.
	At least 10,000 people displaced from their homes, 1,290 houses burnt to the ground in Nigeria.
	That's how those Christians' Christmas went.
	How was your Christmas? What's your Christmas going to be like in the future?
	If we're going to step back and let these people, if we're not going to resist this, you know, again, going back to that Baphomet statue in Iowa, it was kind of funny some of the people's reaction to that.
	They said, oh, well, we shouldn't knock down the statues of the left because they might start doing that to us.
	Yeah, they've been doing that for quite some time, right?
	That was a sarcasm.
	But these Nigerian Christians are forgotten by the West.
	Does Biden care? Does any Western government care?
	Does the Western press care?
	No. Not at all.
	All these stories are coming from secondary and tertiary outlets, some of them coming from Christian publications.
	But we also had, over the Christmas season, there was allegedly terrorist plots in Germany, It's not just what
	is happening in Nigeria, because, of course, The people who want to destroy the West, people like Soros and Klaus Schwab and others, they want to bring in radical terrorists to do the same type of thing in the West that they're doing in Nigeria.
	And so, one of the chief targets was apparently the 13th Century Cologne Cathedral, Germany's most visited tourist attraction.
	On Saturday evening, police searched the historic site with bomb-detecting dogs to ensure that no explosives had been hidden in the cathedral.
	This is another M.O. of the Islamicists.
	You know, when you look at the fight that's going on right now between Greece and the British Museum, They say, give us back the Elgin marbles, and the Elgin marbles lived in Texas, and they called it Elgin, but it was always Lord Elgin.
	Anyway, they called it that because he was the one who brought back the fragments of the Parthenon after the Turks had blown it up.
	And so they do that a lot, you know, the...
	The bullet holes on the face of the Sphinx and everything, that's Muslims who are doing that, defacing the Sphinx, blowing up the Parthenon.
	And here you have them, perhaps, if the police are telling the truth, I tend to believe that this particular one was for real, but perhaps trying to do the same thing to an ancient cathedral.
	In addition to standing as one of Germany's top historical landmarks, the Cologne Cathedral was also the epicenter of the infamous sex attacks on New Year's Eve in 2015.
	Remember that? Where you had over a thousand women in Cologne claimed to have been sexually assaulted.
	The attackers were of North African foreign or foreign descent.
	This is what they're doing. They're literally raping and pillaging the West.
	Truly as the barbarians brought inside the gate by people like Biden, by people like Majorca.
	On top of the alleged plot in Cologne, other targets for suspected Islamist terrorists included locations in Madrid, Spain, and Vienna, Austria, where several of the arrests on Saturday were made.
	And, of course, that's just before New Year's Eve.
	Here in the U.S., of course, over the Christmas holidays, we saw a lot of pro-Palestinian protesters, Storming Manhattan and shutting down Christmas celebrations in California.
	This is what they're working up to.
	Christmas is canceled here, they shouted, as they paraded a blood-red mock nativity scene throughout the streets of New York.
	Long live the intifada, said the roughly 500 demonstrators, as they swarmed Rockefeller Center Christmas tree where people were trying to enjoy the day.
	So, these are the people, by the way, that the Israeli officials are saying they need to adopt more of them here in the United States.
	One person's comment was, maybe trying to run Christmas in New York isn't the best way to garner sympathy for your cause.
	Well, you know, Babylon Bee pointed that out with one of the climate protesters.
	In the Babylon Bee satire, they said, guys, he's been blocked in traffic for hours by these people who've glued themselves to the streets, says, you know, I think I see their point.
	I agree with them now.
	You know, that certainly isn't going to happen, but they don't care.
	And so it happened in San Francisco as well, as they were screaming, no Christmas as usual.
	So San Francisco, New York, we need to have more people like that.
	And India, not just in Nigeria.
	Christians in northern India didn't even have a Christmas celebration.
	They were afraid to come out, right?
	This is what they want to do to us in terms of, you know, this has been a, all my life, I have seen the federal government trying to suppress the free exercise of religion.
	Beginning, of course, in the educational institutions, because that's where they roll out their agendas.
	And so they want to suppress the free exercise of religion, and they've been successful in terms of doing this in India because of violence.
	Here in the United States, how do you get what you want done?
	Well, you just remove money, right?
	You sue somebody or you stop giving them federal money, and then we just cave because we're all about the money.
	In other places, they actually use violence.
	The Hindu Nationalist Government of India presided over the escalation of Christian persecution there at a record pace.
	And of course, last summer, we had the Prime Minister of India, Modi.
	He was celebrated by Biden, but he was also celebrated by all the Republicans.
	There was a bipartisan celebration of this guy in one of the places where we have the most ruthless, violent persecution of Christians.
	Why would we support somebody like that even if it wasn't our religion?
	But even more importantly, why would you have conservative Christian nominally representatives who would celebrate this as well?
	I wouldn't celebrate that if they were doing it to anyone.
	I don't celebrate what's being done in Gaza.
	But they certainly celebrated Modi.
	So... What I said when he was standing next to Biden, I'm actually really surprised that people would say that there's persecution going on here.
	And he says, because India is a democracy.
	We have always proved that democracy can deliver.
	And when I say deliver, this is regardless of caste, creed, religion, gender.
	There's absolutely no space for discrimination.
	In reality, Hindu nationalists organized mob attacks on Christian communities throughout the year, burning down churches, often destroying entire neighborhoods, leaving Christians displaced.
	The worst of the violence in 2023 occurred in Manipur, northern India, where members of the majority Hindu tribe went on a rampage against majority Christian communities throughout the spring and summer as Modi was being feted and celebrated by Democrats where members of the majority Hindu tribe went on a rampage against majority They often filmed their atrocities,
	and the Modi government did not even comment on the matter until a video went viral in the rest of the country showing a mob of the Hindu men raping Christian women in broad daylight and then parading them naked through the street.
	And finally, in Armenia, of course, there's been a lot of violence there.
	Azerbaijan attacking the few remaining Christians there in Nagorno-Karabakh.
	I guess when we talk about Silent Night, maybe what that is really about is the silence about Christian persecution that we find in our government.
	No, we don't have a Christian America.
	And no, people like Nick Quintes do not represent Christianity.
	And I hope they don't come to represent America.
	We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues...
	Or bluegrass.
	APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com. APSradio.com
	APSradio.com
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk a little bit about influencers here.
	You know, as we talk about Jeffrey Epstein and how he was connected with Mossad, most likely with the CIA as well, as we see that there was a no-prosecution agreement for him.
	It's interesting to see how the CIA, how the federal government is involved with And so many of these social movements that are there.
	As I said earlier, we have Homeland Security is now working with universities to shut down the quote-unquote manosphere And yet, there is some interesting, as we look at some of the influencers who are out there, just keep in mind, the way they work is with the Hegelian dialectic.
	You have a thesis, you have an antithesis, they thrive off of that struggle between the two.
	And as a person pointed out on Twitter, he says, isn't it interesting, all these people now who have become the influencers on the right, how they've got...
	Family connections into the CIA. I've said this about Tucker.
	I've said it about Alex. And it's true.
	They openly talk about it.
	Another one that is there, Andrew Tate, openly talked about his connections, family connections to the CIA. One person on Reddit said, isn't it a bit suspicious to anyone else?
	The son of a CIA agent?
	It was Andrew Tate, who claims to be fighting the Matrix by awakening people and making them rich is actually appearing all over the internet all of a sudden.
	He claims his father was a CIA agent, he says.
	He said he excelled at everything he did within the agency, and that he was also a grandmaster chess player.
	But if Tate is a threat to the system, why is he showing up so many places?
	Now, I know a lot of people say, yeah, but he's been arrested in Romania.
	Well, I mean... That's the Romanian government.
	That's not our government. Maybe there's some people in the Romanian government who arrested him, and then I think they got the memo, because they've really eased up on him lately.
	He's allowed to not travel outside the country, but of course he can roam around.
	They've given him a looser chain to move around the country, and of course Tucker Carlson went to Romania to talk to him.
	Tucker Carlson wanted to feature...
	The King of Davos, Kevin Spacey for Christmas for all of us.
	Nothing suspicious in any of that, is there?
	I mean, there was a lot of criticism of Tucker when he was elevating someone like Andrew Tate.
	And yet there's this new biography that has come out on Tucker.
	by Chadwick Moore, and I saw this op-ed piece from somebody who said, well, you know, I've never been a regular watcher of Tucker, but even though he was, I shouldn't admit that, he said, even though he's kind enough to host me on his daytime program for an hour-long discussion,
	But he said, my favorable impression of him comes from knowing that he rejects and has frequently attacked and demolished the suffocating tissue of propaganda lies, the narrative which our rulers use to control us.
	Really?
	He said, Carlson is unique in that he has both has had and has used a media platform with enormous reach to spread his message of truth.
	Really?
	This is a guy who said, well, you know, building 1750.
	I got a lot of questions about it, but I wasn't allowed to ask that because, you know, they'd fire me.
	And this is the guy who was paid, what, $25 million a year by Fox, largely from big pharmaceutical companies?
	He wouldn't tell the people the truth about that.
	He'd just say, well, you know, I don't know.
	I'm not allowed to talk about these types of things.
	Or, you know, there's this vaccine out there.
	I don't know. I don't know what to say about that.
	I'm not going to get it. And maybe I'll start asking some questions about Building 7 when, as I've played for you, he was one of their key propaganda guys, shutting that down.
	Gets a physicist on to use him as a straw man to argue against us.
	A physicist said, would you show that video that I have of the collapse?
	No, I'm not going to show that video.
	Because if he showed that video, everybody would know that Tucker was lying.
	He hasn't said, you know, I regret putting that out there.
	He just said, I wasn't allowed to talk about it.
	This guy says, rather than wondering how this will look to others, Tucker Carlson does what he wants and what he thinks is best at the moment.
	Really? He said just the opposite.
	You don't believe Tucker when he says he wasn't allowed to talk about these things?
	Building 7 or the other shoe to drop from 9-11, the dark winter 2 pandemic that he kept quiet about, that he still hasn't exposed.
	Still hasn't exposed Trump's bioweapons.
	No, he's out there playing footsie with people like Andrew Tate, Kevin Spacey, and other people.
	To this day, he's still dancing around these issues.
	So he'll give you some truth about some things, because that's what a con man does.
	He gains your confidence. And that's what a double agent does as well.
	When you're talking about spycraft, right?
	You've got somebody who's a double agent.
	You've got to give them some real intelligence.
	You know, if you crack the code, you crack the Enigma code, you can't tell them that you've got the Enigma code, so you've got to sacrifice some people as if you didn't know they were going to be killed in this operation.
	You feed them some truth if you've got a double agent, just so that when it comes to a really critical point, you can then deceive them.
	And that's what we seem to be seeing over and over again, isn't it?
	You know, when we talk about Jeffrey Epstein again, The key issue, everybody wants to focus on the salient, not the salient, but the salacious aspects of this and about the partisan politics, as I said yesterday.
	Newsweek has an article about it, and it's all about Trump.
	Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump.
	Very last paragraph, it's like, well, Bill Clinton was also in the logs, but I'm sure he didn't do anything, that type of thing.
	Thank you.
	And it's just the opposite when you look at the MAGA bird press.
	It's all about Bill Clinton.
	Let me tell you, it's all about the CIA and Mossad.
	That's what it's really about. And I think it's interesting that after the day after you had the alleged suicide of Jeffrey Epstein, you go back to August of 2019, do you remember how Ghislaine Maxwell goes to an N-Out burger and she sits there posing for a picture and she's holding a book?
	Do you remember what the book was?
	The book was The Book of Honor, The Secret Lives and Deaths of CIA Operatives.
	That's the book that she's talking about, that she's holding up.
	That was a message that she was sending the day that Jeffrey Epstein was allegedly killed.
	The Secret Lives and Deaths of CIA Operatives.
	Was she telling everybody that he was a CIA operative?
	Was he? Did he work for Israel?
	Did he work for the CIA? Did he work for both of them?
	Now we know that he had a non-prosecution agreement.
	So, the Book of Honor investigates CIA operatives who died in the line of duty.
	It focuses on agents whose service was kept a secret even after their death.
	And so Ted Goop, who was the author of the book, has had a lot of reports about government secrecy.
	He seems to have some good sources.
	He was the one who broke the information about the Greenbrier Resort in Virginia back in 1992, how there was a massive underground bunker there for politicians in Washington.
	If they could get to the Greenbrier Resort not too far away from Washington, they could get to their underground bunkers.
	They shut that down, they said, after that was made public, but they build their underground bunkers so they can save themselves while the rest of us die in the wars that they start.
	So he seemed to have some good sources there, but I think she was sending us a message.
	That in his alleged death, he was actually a CIA agent or an Assad agent.
	And then we have another thing of news here.
	When we look at these influencers, people who are still on Fox News, we had Jesse Waters and people on Fox News made some statements and allegations about insider trading.
	They say that Crenshaw, Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, among the top 2023 stock traders.
	This is the Breitbart article, and Jesse Waters ran with it.
	And so they say that Dan Crenshaw's stock portfolio was up by 38%.
	Nancy Pelosi's was up by 65.5% because she's always been the poster child for insider trading in Congress.
	Mitch McConnell was up 18%.
	Dan Goldman, Democrat of New York, up 52%.
	Almost as good as Nancy.
	And the top trader was Brian Higgins, Democrat from New York.
	His was up 238.9%.
	And so...
	With that information, Jesse Waters does a segment on that and accuses Dan Crenshaw.
	And I'm not a Dan Crenshaw supporter, as you know.
	I mean, you know, he's a warmonger.
	He is...
	I don't really share any of his political beliefs.
	He's been associated with the World Economic Forum.
	And I'm not a supporter of his.
	But Dan Crenshaw...
	Was furious and pushed back against this.
	And on this particular case, I think Crenshaw is right about what Jesse Waters did.
	He accused him of insider trading on Fox News, and Crenshaw said he's a clown, he's a hack, he's a dirtbag millionaire, he's a mediocre entertainer.
	He said he's a loser who grew up with a silver spoon, cheated on his wife, then left her with twins while he went off with another Fox producer.
	It's important to know the background of people that you're taking advice from to know if they've got integrity.
	Crenshaw said he did confirm that he had $10,000 invested in stocks, but he says he hasn't made any trades in over a year.
	That's in direct conflict to what the Breitbart headline said.
	The Breitbart headline said the biggest traders.
	Well, it turns out that he was invested in something over a year ago.
	And it went up in value, but it wasn't that he was trading on insider information necessarily.
	He said, I've never had more than $20,000 invested.
	Fox knows this, but they're desperate for fake controversy in order to get clicks.
	Bingo. Bingo.
	I agree with him what he says about that.
	And just to give you an example...
	of how desperate they are to get clicks and what a third-rate entertainer Jesse Waters is.
	Just take a look at what he did.
	He brought on a psychic.
	To talk about what is going to be happening for Trump's future.
	And I'm not talking about Julie Green.
	I mean, this is a tarot card reading psychic.
	Look at this. The English psychic who is on set to give us a reading right now.
	I would like, Paula, for you to give me a reading on President Trump.
	Just the one card. One card.
	One card. Let's do just one card.
	We like that one. Uh-oh.
	Uh-oh. What is that?
	I mean, I do recognize it on Fox TV. A sense of loss.
	A sense of loss. But it's very specific.
	No, let me move on.
	It's a sense of loss.
	It's as if he may be thinking more about what he's lost and not still taking full advantage of what he still has.
	That's a great interpretation, Paula.
	It's true. Yeah, there we go.
	First of all, notice all this.
	First of all, he's a cringy, bad entertainer.
	Number two, when she flips over that card, he's like, uh-oh, he knows that's something bad.
	So he's done this stuff before.
	He knows her, right? So I guess maybe he uses her all the time.
	All the time. This is who you're getting your news from.
	And then, of course, when it is something bad, she's got to think of a quick explanation about how to not criticize Trump on Fox News.
	What a phony bunch of information.
	This is why I say, look, you know, people can say I'm bitter about other stuff.
	I don't have any relationships with Fox News or with Andrew Tate or with Jesse Waters or any of these people.
	I just want you to understand where they're coming from.
	And how they're selling you lies and clickbait stuff.
	So that you question what they're telling you.
	It's absolute garbage.
	It's no wonder that everybody is so benighted in this country that they're focused on Biden or Trump.
	When that is what passes for information.
	Really? Seriously, you going to talk about that?
	As elections are looming, Taiwan is battling massive cyber threats, says a cyber security expert.
	Well, the first thing I would say about this is, and I thought this was going to be about their vulnerability to the Chinese Communist Party hacking their electronic voting machines, which is probably true, but they don't talk about that so much.
	No, actually what they're talking about as a cyber threat, and it's not something that a cyber security expert should be involved in.
	They're talking about the cyber threat being China.
	You know, using social media to influence public opinion.
	I do believe that they have electronic voting machines.
	I would be surprised if a country that is technologically advanced like Taiwan is not filled with voting machines, and if they're not completely vulnerable to cybersecurity.
	Look, understand, whenever you've got electronic voting machines, they're going to be vulnerable to being hacked.
	As I've said before, the CIA got its manual and its code about how they would hack and other countries and how they would disguise themselves as other countries when they did the hacking.
	That was stolen from them.
	Just like we've had Pentagon personnel files stolen.
	There isn't anything that can't be hacked.
	But now what they're talking about is manipulating the January elections.
	What they're talking about is social media manipulation.
	Manipulation of public opinion being done by China, by the CCP. Understand that that kind of manipulation is being done in the open.
	By our own government.
	You know, it's not just the lies that they told about Donald Trump with Russian collusion and stuff like that.
	It's the CCP of America.
	The CCPA, which actually stands for the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authentication.
	The thing that was funded by DARPA through Microsoft to make sure that people they don't like Are not even allowed to post anything, that you intercept it there.
	So the coalition of hardware, CPU companies, as well as the software creators working with government, working with the government, mainstream media, the mockingbird press, to shut all this stuff down.
	You see, they don't want to have debates on the Republican side, on the Democrat side, and they don't want you having a debate about any of this stuff anywhere.
	Not on social media, not on a website.
	They want to be able to shut all this stuff down.
	Election Guard running through not just CCPA, but also Election Guard being run through and funded by DARPA. Again, it is the military-industrial complex, the intelligence agencies here in America that are focused on shutting down free speech.
	As we look at the election, the House GOP majority just keeps shrinking.
	They only have a three-vote cushion.
	They will not be able to afford to lose any more than two votes on any party-line measure because you've now got the resignation of, after they threw out George Santos, the resignation of Kevin McCarthy on December the 31st.
	So, again, they could wind up losing their majority before the election.
	And as I mentioned earlier in the program, Thomas Massey, He says he has co-sponsored a proposed amendment to the Constitution.
	He said, currently congressional districts are apportioned to states based on the population of citizens and non-citizens, which gives states with numerous illegal aliens an advantage in Congress and also in the Electoral College.
	They don't have to vote in order to help the Democrat Party.
	They just have to be there and be counted.
	And so Warren Davidson also said congressional districts should be drawn based on the population of U.S. citizens only.
	The census should specifically count U.S. citizens for apportionment of representation and only U.S. citizens.
	And that's why you had Thomas Massey reply to that and say, yeah, I've sponsored a constitutional amendment to do exactly that.
	But Warren Davidson says, in California, they have five to seven extra members of Congress because the census uses total population counts non-citizens.
	Now, do you understand why?
	Gavin Newsom is willing to spend California into such deep debt, offering free medical care, free unemployment checks to people as soon as they come across.
	It is the great magnet, and he uses that as a political base.
	Get more representation for California in Congress.
	They play this game very precisely what they want.
	And as all this is happening, you look at the January 6th defendants, more people every day.
	They've now had 1,237 people arrested over this stop-the-steal nonsense.
	And they have handed out combined prison sentences so far to the people who have had their trial, and not all these people have been arrested.
	Not all the 1,200 people have had a trial yet.
	But they have added, they have put out prison sentences of 847 years combined for all these people who were led astray, led astray by Trump and by the Stop the Steal stuff.
	It never stops, does it?
	And yet, who are our heroes?
	Who are the people that we turn to for information and guidance?
	The same wolves among the sheep.
	Thank you for joining us.
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲