Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 19, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:11

The David Knight Show - 09/19/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday the 19th of September, year of our Lord 2023.
	23.
	Well, today we're going to look at the interesting case of the lost and found F-35.
	It has a lot of lessons to teach us about our military.
	And maybe there's a lot of games being played with this narrative.
	There's a lot of stuff that doesn't really add up.
	And of course, as we always see, there's a false detail that is added in here to throw people off the scent.
	We'll take a look at the red herring.
	We'll take a look at the pathetic Defense Department.
	And we'll take a look at what really may be behind all of this.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	And everybody was mocking them from Congresswoman Nancy Mace to the Babylon Bee.
	Babylon Bee had the best one, of course.
	Military personnel seen wandering the forest, pressing a button on an F-35 key fob.
	A team of Marines was seen trudging through the woods, stopping every 30 feet away with key fob in about a 90-degree arc, say campers.
	The Marines who traveled in a tactical column were allegedly on a mission to locate, close with, and recover.
	The F-35 fighter jet that went missing Sunday evening.
	Actually, it was Sunday about 2 o'clock, they say.
	No contact, redacted whispered after stopping to listen.
	Sources confirmed the missing F-35 never beeped in response to signals from the key fob, even if the unit leader did that thing where he tried to place it under his chin to use his head as a natural antenna to magnify his wireless range.
	The main rifle team, led by, redacted, has thus far been unable to find, redacted, we have, redacted, that cannot fall into the wrong hands, said, redacted.
	And so, as people were asking questions about this, such as why did the pilot eject from a plane that was clearly not crashing, that's a key thing, isn't it?
	We'll be talking about that here.
	Why can't they locate it via transponder?
	Was radar just not being used that day for some reason?
	No, really. Don't those things have GPS on them or something?
	Where could it possibly have gone?
	Was it aliens? Well, you know, you've got the UAP program.
	Maybe it falls under that now, you know.
	It's not an unidentified object, but maybe it's an unoccupied aeroplane that is on autopilot.
	Yeah, really strange. U.S. Marines still hunting for the missing $80 million F-35 fighter jet after a quote-unquote mishap.
	And so this was yesterday afternoon, and they were being trolled and laughed at everywhere.
	And then, voila, they find it.
	Just like that. Almost got those key fobs working.
	Tried that trick with the head.
	Pilot safely ejects.
	But there's no sign the aircraft crashed, they said.
	Just moments before, they said, well, we found some debris.
	And so, very strange in a lot of different ways.
	They said it occurred about 2 p.m.
	on Sunday and involved two Marine Corps jets.
	You see, they were flying in pairs.
	And a wingman, right?
	Oh, what did the other guy do?
	He went back to base.
	He didn't fly. This guy ejected and the plane is flying, you know, and he just, he doesn't bother to follow it.
	No, he goes back to base.
	That's a really strange thing.
	And so forcing one pilot to eject after the pilot switched on an unspecified autopilot system.
	Really? I mean, look, these guys are basically trained to pretty much fly it into the ground and eject at the very last moment, if necessary.
	You lose a jet like that, that's a big deal to your career.
	So you're just going to turn on the autopilot and eject?
	Is that standard operating procedure to turn on the autopilot and then eject?
	In the mid-flight, it's pretty far up in the air.
	Emergency response teams, at this point in time, when the Daily Caller wrote this article, still trying to locate the F-35.
	And this is over 24 hours after.
	Supposedly, the plane and the pilot went their separate ways.
	And the wingman just returned to base.
	Oh well, I guess we're done today.
	I'd go home early and play some video games or something.
	The public is asked to cooperate with military and civilian authorities as the effort continues.
	And that's why people are saying, so he wants to go out and look for it for you or whatever.
	As a matter of fact, they pulled this up on eBay.
	I took a screenshot of this because I figured it wasn't going to last too long.
	And a guy put up on eBay, put up a picture of the plane.
	It says, Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II fighter recently found.
	She's a beauty, he says.
	It's used. Condition is used.
	She's a beauty, landed on her own.
	She needs a home, as I do not know how to get her home.
	And he's asking only $30,000 for it.
	And he points out, as he describes it, it's unbranded.
	He says it's gray, metal, and lightning Lockheed Martin.
	Item description.
	What a find in the mountains of Appalachia.
	An F-35. Always wanted to fly one, but do not have the proper training, so letting her go to a good home.
	Discounted pricing, a rare find to a pilot, preferably U.S. military trained.
	Well, there you go.
	And so it all ended happily, I guess, with the pilot saved and the debris found and mystery solved.
	Now, there's a lot of questions.
	It crashed 80 miles, they say, from the pilot's ejection area.
	And so I thought, well, how long was it in the air then before it crashed?
	Because nobody else is really talking about that.
	So they say that, you know, it can go Mach 1.2 or something like that.
	They say that it cruises.
	You know, you don't want to go pedal to the metal.
	That kind of cuts down on your fuel economy there.
	So typically it's cruising around at about.85 Mach.
	So 761 miles per hour is what I see for Mach 1.
	You guys can check my calculations.
	So if it's cruising around at about.85 Mach, that's about 650 miles.
	So if it's going to crash after 80 miles, that means that it would have been in the air for seven and a half minutes.
	But the wingman really had to get back for some reason.
	I don't know why he had to get back so quickly.
	He couldn't wait around for seven and a half minutes to see this thing.
	And then they're looking for it for 24 and a half hours.
	And so it's very interesting to ask some questions about this, as some people are.
	When you, as a matter of fact, some people, Daily Mail actually pulled up.
	They didn't have a picture of this crashing.
	Nobody took pictures of it with a big plume of smoke coming up.
	So Daily Mail had pictures of an F-35 that crashed just outside of Salt Lake City in October of 2022.
	It says, large plumes of smoke were seen where the F-35 crashed just outside of Salt Lake City in October of 2022.
	But for this one, there's no pictures.
	There's no reports.
	The closest you get is one outlet said local media.
	I said, yeah, some people said they thought it hurt a low-flying jet, but not a crash.
	And Greg Talon on Rockman, the pilot got a text of the previous pilot in the plane that just tested positive for COVID, so he had to eject.
	Don't forget to put on your mask.
	So, you know, local media said some people had hurt a low-flying jet.
	They didn't say they'd heard a crash.
	They didn't see any smoke. There wasn't any pictures like there was when these other planes crashed.
	The question is, you know, what's going on?
	I mean, responders not working.
	They can't find it with satellites.
	As a matter of fact, some people say, you know, radar turned off, as Babylon Beach said.
	I said, well, you know, this is a stealth plane.
	It's designed to avoid radar.
	Not going to be visible on radar, so I guess it's invisible to a satellite.
	I guess when it crashed and burned, only 80 miles from where the incident happened, the satellite couldn't see the plume of smoke or anything like that either.
	But then the big question is, why did he eject?
	That is a real key question, isn't it?
	And so, as you look at this, oh, by the way, let me show you, like I said, pilots will typically fly these things into the ground.
	They don't just give up and jump out.
	Especially when it's on autopilot, cruising, you don't jump out.
	Take a look at this.
	Here's a video of a jet crash that just recently happened near the Italian city of Turin.
	As a matter of fact, it happened on Saturday.
	A five-year-old girl on the ground was killed.
	Her family, siblings, and parents all suffered severe burns in all of this.
	This was people practicing for an air show.
	They had multiple Air Maki MB-339 aircraft flying in V-formations before one of them loses altitude and plunges with its pilot scene ejecting shortly before the impact.
	Now, take a look at this. This is the jet crash, and you can, as you see this, you'll see the jet going down.
	You see the pilot and the little dark line shooting up, and then you see the big fireball when it hits.
	There's a pilot ejection.
	There's a fireball. Yeah, they tend to have a fireball when they crash, and there's lots of smoke and, you know, explosions and things like that.
	You know, the crash caused a huge explosion on the ground.
	Photos of the aftermath showing debris in the field.
	But people for some reason didn't see or hear that in South Carolina.
	So a lot of people are asking questions about this.
	And before it was, you know, on Sunday when people from the Pentagon are saying, hey, we've lost a plane.
	Can you help us find it? People say, what?
	This doesn't make any sense. So, they started putting out statements saying, well, maybe this was hacked by the Chinese and flown to Cuba.
	Maybe the Chinese hacked into this thing, ejected the pilot mid-flight, you know, took over the plane, ejected the pilot, and then took it over and flew it to Cuba.
	Now, I don't think that's what happened.
	The range for the F-35B, you know, there's three different variants of the F-35, and we'll talk about that in a moment, because it says a great deal about the state of the Pentagon, this whole F-35 program.
	But the range for the F-35B, so the Air Force has got one, the Navy's got one, and the Marines have got one.
	And they don't have interchangeable parts that really work very well.
	That's the other part of things that makes this incredibly expensive.
	But the F-35B has a range of only about 800 miles, which is at or less than the distance at this point of the ejection where they're saying it happened.
	So really not likely that it was taken over and flown to Cuba.
	However, the rest of that is very, very plausible.
	And as I look at that, and as I've said this over and over again, whenever there is something...
	That they get caught out on.
	They tend to add a false detail to it that they can debunk.
	And then use that to debunk the entire thing, the entire narrative, you see?
	And I kind of think that's what's happening here with this Cuba thing.
	Every bit of this, the fact that they would hack this, the fact that they could take it over, the fact that they would put it on autopilot and eject the pilot, that's all very possible.
	Very possible. And I'll give you an example of what the Chinese are...
	Chinese have been involved in very, very heavy electronic warfare and hacking against the U.S. military stuff, especially the Navy, especially the Marines, for the last five years or so.
	And they've openly admitted it.
	About every six months, we get a report about how the Navy or ships or this or that...
	Our bases in Guam, all because of China and the Taiwan thing.
	About every six months, the Pentagon will put something out about how the Chinese have hacked.
	And it's most likely happening all the time.
	They only just put out these PR releases about every six to nine months.
	And so there's a lot of people that are mocking this on social media, that it was hacked and then flown to Cuba.
	And again, I think all this is very, very probable and possible, certainly possible, and perhaps even probable, except for the Cuba thing.
	That allows them to, with that false detail, to mock it so that people stop asking questions like, why did he eject with it on autopilot?
	That is a key question.
	And so...
	And why did the other plane just fly away?
	Why did it not watch? Did the other plane fly away because it too was worried that it was going to get hacked?
	Seriously. You don't put a plane on autopilot and then eject, and the other wingman would not fly away as this thing is flying on autopilot.
	You would think that he would want to follow it, and if it looked like it was headed for a really heavy population area, that he would take it out before it hit the population area.
	Wouldn't you think that would be standard procedure?
	And so, then the other side of this is, why would the Chinese, if they had the ability to hack this?
	And don't tell me that this is some kind of military planes that's invulnerable to hacking.
	They're just as vulnerable as anybody else.
	Any of this stuff. We have seen cars taken over, over and over again.
	Going back to Michael Hastings, which is how Joe Biggs got to Infowars.
	He had known Michael Hastings when Michael Hastings was doing reporting in Afghanistan.
	And he didn't believe that Michael Hastings...
	Had had a car crash.
	I didn't believe it either. The reason I didn't believe it was because his engine was...
	There's video of him going really fast.
	Michael Hastings was a reporter.
	He did a lot of reporting on, I think, McChrystal and Petraeus and, you know, their stupid entourages and how they're going to fix everything.
	And it was always just, you know, more of the same.
	It was made into a movie with Brad Pitt, and McChrystal, I think, was the main guy.
	McChrystal and his entourage, because these top generals have a big entourage of people around them, they really wanted to get Michael Hastings, a reporter.
	Threatened him and that type of thing.
	He was concerned. He was working on a story that he was very concerned about.
	Told people he was going to be disappearing to try to protect himself.
	He was checking his car for bombs and things like that before this happened.
	And there was video of him just flying down the road really fast, you know.
	It goes over an intersection.
	His car goes slightly airborne and hits and that type of thing.
	And then you don't see the explosion.
	They show the car run up against a tree.
	I looked at that and I thought, well, first of all, cars don't always explode when they have a crash, right?
	Into a fireball, which is what you see in the movies all the time.
	And if he had, if the collision that killed him Was flying into, at that speed, flying into the tree.
	I would expect there to be a lot more deformation of the car than there was, number one.
	But the biggest thing to me that smelled like a rat from the very beginning was the fact that the engine kept going in a straight line down the road.
	And then he went off to the side and hit a tree.
	And there really wasn't much frontal damage to that.
	But how in the world do you have the engine ejected at a right angle?
	When you hit a tree, it pushes it into the car, obviously.
	And the gas tank, which is in the back of the car, was not compromised at all.
	At the time, I got a lot of videos, just like I did for 9-11.
	I got a lot of videos. I looked at car crashes of race cars, things like that.
	You can see There's one that I picked out that was very interesting because it showed a bad spot, an oil slick or something on a track.
	And as the cars were coming around, each one of them flies off of the track and crashes.
	Several of them crashed front first, no fire.
	Then one of them comes around, it spins around and hits back end first where the tank is.
	Boom, instant exposure, just like the movies.
	Anyway, the bottom line is, as all that was happening, everybody was poo-pooing the idea that it could have been an explosion, that the car could have been hacked and flown down the road at really high speed.
	But we'd already had, at the Black Hat Conference and DEF CON, we'd already had demonstrations over and over again of people hacking into all kinds of cars.
	That, you know, take over the brake system, take over the steering system, because now you've got all these safety devices that take over the brakes and take over the steering.
	And so you can do that type of thing.
	It wasn't a theory.
	As a matter of fact, Richard Clark had indicated a couple of years prior to that, as I was doing research, that, yeah, you can assassinate people with this.
	So it wasn't a conspiracy theory.
	It was a conspiracy fact.
	That you can kill people by taking over their cars.
	And that was a decade ago or more, I guess, 2013 or something.
	And 14 maybe.
	And so, but this is the military.
	They would never get hacked.
	Well, the Pentagon's personnel files have been hacked.
	And as we see here, they've been just, the Navy has been an open door.
	To the Chinese in terms of cyber espionage.
	And so if they were able to hack the plane, the question then is, why would they show their hand?
	Why would they let the U.S. military know that they had done this?
	Perhaps they did it to intimidate them over all the saber-rattling over Taiwan and to intimidate them from doing anything.
	Perhaps that's what it is.
	Just guessing here. But you saw these headlines.
	Fanboys think the missing F-35 made it to Cuba.
	And, you know, well, I wouldn't worry, one person says, I wouldn't worry about Lauren Boebert filling up a dude in the theater.
	I would worry how an unmanned American F-35 landed safely in Havana.
	And then, you know, these people come back and say, in all seriousness, it's actually more plausible that an alien spacecraft cracked a beam, the wayward F-35, into its undercarriage and took it home to study primitive Earth technology.
	But since that doesn't fit with the Biden is so weak on the CHICOMS narrative, we'll just get this BS instead.
	Well, Biden is weak, and it is not a theory that the Chinese can hack the military.
	Unfounded rumors claim missing F-35 jet found in Havana.
	Again. It is not a conspiracy that they've been hacked and been hacked big time.
	So let's take a look at what they've gone public about.
	Just this last May, Chinese state-sponsored hackers infiltrated U.S. naval infrastructure, says the Secretary of the Navy.
	By the way, we've had the CIA and the NSA hacked.
	And then they stole their tools that they used to hack other people and to make it look like they were other people.
	Vault 7, remember that? And that was released by WikiLeaks.
	And that was the CIA's tool.
	First they released the manual, then eventually some other people who actually did the hack released the actual tool of Vault 7.
	So now these state actors can all hack anybody that they wish and make it look like they are somebody else.
	So they don't even know if it was the Chinese.
	It could have been the Russians. It could have been anybody that hacked the Navy.
	But, you know, we've had personnel files stolen.
	We've had their own hacking tools stolen and made public.
	And so now we have, as of May this year, U.S. Navy hit by Chinese state-sponsored hack that Microsoft disclosed on Wednesday, said the Secretary of the Navy.
	Again, they don't know who it is.
	China, if they didn't have Vault 7 before, it would look like anybody they wanted to look like.
	They've got it now. Everybody does.
	U.S. Navy has been impacted by the cyber attacks.
	It's no surprise that China has been behaving in this manner, and not just for the last couple of years, but for decades, said the Secretary of the Navy.
	See, they knew all about it.
	They were expecting it. So you can't pull any wool over their eyes.
	Yeah, they're not surprised, but they couldn't defend against it.
	Yeah, they didn't catch us.
	We knew they were going to hack us.
	They've been hacking us for decades.
	But he admits that they can't do anything about it.
	If they've been hacked by the Chinese for decades, they can't come up with a defense against that?
	And we're going to computerize everything?
	We're going to have...
	We're going to not have humans fly into planes anymore.
	The planes are fly-by-war anyway, so we're going to have the artificial intelligence drones flying it, and then we are going to have our autonomous killer drones, and everything will be just fine.
	It isn't like the Chinese or the Russians are going to hack any of that stuff and use it against us, or just shut it down, right?
	Yeah, we'll be fine.
	You know, they know about these threats.
	They just can't do anything about it.
	As they turn everything into that kind of vulnerability.
	Microsoft issued a warning, as did the intelligence agencies NSA and CISA, Chinese hackers and targeted communications maritime sectors in Guam.
	They said the hacking group appears to focus on surveillance rather than disruption, at least at that point in time.
	But top intelligence officials and researchers expressed concern that Guam had been targeted, telling the New York Times that the island territory would be crucial to fending off a long-feared invasion of Taiwan by China.
	Now, that was in May.
	And, you know, talking about Guam, home to several military installations, including a large contingent of B-52 bombers and U.S. Navy submarines.
	And so they said, so what was affected at the time?
	This is May. This last May.
	Well, the full extent of the hack is not clear.
	They hacked it, so we're really not sure.
	But the infrastructure targeted, quote, spans communications, manufacturing, utility, transportation, construction, maritime, government, information technology, and education sectors.
	Is there anything that they didn't get?
	Seriously. And so going back, we see this happening in June of 2018.
	Big hack happened then.
	Then there was another one that happened and was reported.
	They admitted in August of 2019.
	Another one that just happened in December of 2022, this last December.
	And those are the ones that they admit.
	How many more hacks happened that they don't admit?
	They know it. I mean, it's been going on for decades.
	They just can't do anything about it, right?
	The Chinese hackers reportedly hit Navy contractors with multiple attacks, and this was back in August of 2019, reportedly successful on several occasions over the past 18 months.
	The infiltrators stole information, including missile plans, Ship maintenance data, according to the Wall Street Journal that was fed that information by the Pentagon doing a mea culpa or doing some kind of a PSYOP operation, I guess.
	Infiltrators reportedly stole plans earlier this year for a supersonic anti-ship missile intended for use by U.S. submarines.
	They're also said to have targeted military research labs at universities.
	Officials say sources and identifying markers have made it clear that China is behind the attacks.
	We've had the Chinese showing up at military bases and all the rest.
	Yeah, I mean, it is very active.
	Very, very active.
	Cold War. And so, some people suggested...
	The spy satellite, as ridiculous as the thing was, maybe, you know, the big issue was that they sent up planes to intercept the spy satellite.
	Maybe they were able to learn something about the communications of the planes.
	I don't know that, but they, you know, a lot of theories about where that came from, but they've been hacking in so many different ways for so long.
	This is June of 2018.
	That was August of 2019.
	So this is, you know, a year and a month, a couple of months earlier.
	China hacked sensitive U.S. Navy undersea warfare plans.
	Happening continuously, where they tell us about every, you know, 6 to 18 months or whatever.
	The one that happened at that point in time, 2018.
	So, later on, you know, that was 2018 December.
	Chinese hackers stole loads of U.S. Navy secrets.
	And the Navy is scrambling to stop it.
	But not really doing too well in terms of stopping it.
	So, it's beyond just a coincidence that some of these things are happening.
	And certainly it is very possible that this happened.
	Perhaps even probable.
	Chinese hackers stole 614 gigabytes of undersea warfare data from the U.S. Navy contractor.
	That was the June 2018 hack.
	So I guess the question is, would it be possible if they've got a lot of information about the F-35 program?
	Perhaps we could do a deal with them like we did with Iran.
	Maybe we could pay China to fix this failed F-35 program, you think?
	Can you guys review this?
	You've got the plans. Can you review this and tell us where we can make this work?
	Because this article from MSNBC, a missing F-35 fighter jet, highlights the tragic comedy of military spending, the $80 million stealth fighter.
	Vanishing for over a day is the kind of thing you'd expect in a farce or a satire.
	Each of these next-generation fighter jets has a price tag that runs upward of $80 million, even before factoring in costs like maintenance.
	The F-35 was first pitched in the early 1990s.
	A host of catastrophes, setbacks, cost overruns have made the F-35 the object of mass ridicule outside of the Pentagon.
	For all of its flaws, and despite it being the most expensive weapon system ever developed, there is no danger that the program will be scrapped anytime soon.
	So what took so long to find the plane?
	Says MSNBC. Well, that's a great question that unfortunately can't be answered easily.
	For one thing, it is designed to not show up easily on radar.
	Again, that's their excuse for this.
	But then talking about the F-35 program itself, I said there's three variants, as I said before, for the Air Force, Marines, and for the Navy.
	They have distinct mission use, but they were supposed to have interchangeable parts.
	And so it looked like a really good deal from the military industrial complex.
	You get three planes in one.
	But that's not the reality.
	Only about 20% of the parts overlap.
	And the lack of spare parts has been a major factor in the plane's problems.
	Earlier this year, the Congressional Budget Office reported that only between 54-58% of F-35 variants in the military's possession were available in 2022.
	The F-35A, which the Air Force uses, was just over 40%.
	The F-35B, this plane in question, and the C, which the Marines and Navies deploy, were only about 20% available.
	Got a lot of issues.
	A lot of maintenance, a lot of expense.
	And just, if you think it's limited...
	To the Pentagon, knowing that they're being the constant Cold War, constant cyber war of China, but totally unable to defend against it.
	And yet, let's make more and more computerized, automated military.
	Let's put it all on the web. That'd be a great idea.
	And meanwhile, they can't execute the most basic stuff because we've got the Pentagon's being run by people in high heels and makeup.
	And I'm not talking about the women.
	And so we've got the military has now forgotten how to build ships for Arctic use.
	They said, well, you know, we haven't built one of these ships since the 1970s.
	76 was the last time they did a heavy icebreaker.
	And so we've forgotten how to do it.
	Yeah, they've forgotten all this stuff.
	Maybe they can come up with some kind of computer way to do this, right?
	No, this is like where the real world is, where the rubber meets the road, or where the ship meets the ice.
	And there isn't any way that you can finesse this with lots of money or computer programs.
	You've got to be able to actually build a tough ship.
	According to the Coast Guard officials and shipyard representatives, U.S. Industrial Base Lacks the experience designing and building a heavy polar icebreaker since the Polar Star and the Polar Sea were designed and built over 45 years ago.
	The GAO says Coast Guard officials and shipyard representatives told us that unlike in other shipbuilding programs, there are no existing U.S.-developed hull designs for heavy polar icebreaker that the shipyard could easily leverage as a basis for this.
	So that's where we are. We have a Pentagon that is all about rainbow flags, but they can't figure out how to do anything.
	And we have these weapon systems that become increasingly expensive and complicated that are easily hacked.
	And yet these people are out there poking the Russian bear, poking the Chinese.
	It truly is amazing, isn't it?
	Well, we're going to take a break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well while we're talking about the military, let's talk briefly here about Ukraine.
	I thought this was pretty amazing that Zelensky is now issuing a veiled threat to destabilize Europe.
	Yes, he really is.
	It's not nice to fool Mother Nature or the Ukrainians by not giving them the weapons that they need to win this war, is what he's saying.
	And we've got a lot of fighters out there.
	They might push back against the Europeans who betrayed them.
	This is his narrative that's coming out now.
	The emerging official narrative, says Zero Hedge, on why Ukraine's counter-offensive ended in failure will be to falsely claim that the West did not provide enough weapons in a timely fashion.
	It'll be the fault of the United States and its allies, or at least this will be solidified as the Ukrainian government's perspective and narrative.
	And it'll be then parroted with Zelensky's most diehard hawkish supporters, like Nikki Haley, who's already doing that.
	Yeah, you know, when we look at what the Pentagon is doing, when we look at what the federal government is doing, and it's a bipartisan thing, really, except for a few Republicans who are pushing back on this, and they're vilified for doing so.
	I forget whether it was Clint Eastwood or John Wayne said, a man's got to know his limitations, right?
	We've got people around the Pentagon who don't even know if they're a man or not.
	Seriously. Tommy Tuberville blocking 300 promotions from this lot of people?
	He ought to get the medal.
	He ought to get the promotion. Seriously, you want these people that have been selected for a promotion?
	Do you think this is about merit?
	They openly despise merit.
	Openly despise it.
	Those people should not be selecting who's going to be promoted.
	That needs to wait until perhaps there's another president, if possible.
	Certainly not this group of people.
	Same type of argument that you would make in terms of replacing Darth Vader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court.
	Wait, and let's have an election first.
	Of course, he's doing it because of their policy about abortion.
	Nikki Haley hates that as well.
	So does Dan Crenshaw. Dan Crenshaw threatening violence.
	To Tommy Tuberville. As these people also, you know, saying they want to invade Mexico.
	War with everybody. You know, how many wars can we have started once, right?
	Continuously going on.
	Zelensky has, this week, been busy advancing this as a key talking point.
	Telling it to CNN that the country waited too long to start the counteroffensive.
	He blames the West for forcing his military leaders to wait so long.
	Yeah, we waited too long, it's true.
	And they put minds in.
	This is where we are.
	We don't know what we're doing, and there's no explanation for this.
	Other than the fact that, as Joel Skousen has said for the longest time, these people really are inviting a nuclear war.
	It's weakness, it's provocation.
	Blame the West, exactly.
	Zelensky is now threatening that Ukrainian refugees will attack Europe if it doesn't keep the gravy train running.
	Here's what he said. He said, curtailing aid to Ukraine will prolong the war.
	It would create risk for the West in its own backyard.
	There's no way to predict how millions of Ukrainian refugees in European countries would react to their country being abandoned.
	Yeah, we might use them as a fifth column against you.
	It wouldn't be the first group of immigrants that have been brought into Europe to destroy it.
	That's going on constantly, so I guess Europeans don't really care.
	He said, Ukrainians have generally behaved well and are very grateful to those who've sheltered them.
	They will not forget that generosity.
	But, but, it would not be a good story for Europe if it were to drive these people into a corner.
	So, let's drive the Russian bear into a corner instead.
	Truly is amazing to see these people.
	So, it would require a totally militarized economy for total war, is what he's saying.
	This is nothing new.
	I've said before, Restovich, when they were elected in 2019 on a campaign of peace, because for five years after the Obama-led coup, and Victoria Nuland and the DNC and Hillary Clinton, five years of that, of them shelling civilians, And both, everybody in Ukraine wanted the war to end, and that's what Zelensky ran on.
	But then, of course, the guy he sent to negotiate the peace stuff told him on Ukrainian television there will be no peace in 2018.
	He says, matter of fact, we're going to go to war with Russia in 2018.
	Oh, that's horrible, said the person.
	He says, no, that's good, because we'll get into...
	Into NATO. The country will be completely destroyed, but we'll be able to get into NATO. That's all they really care about.
	And so when we look at where they're headed, there's Nikki Haley, you know, she is very strident and saying, don't pull out now.
	Keep giving billions in support to Ukraine.
	It'll never be enough for Nikki Haley.
	One of the most rabid of all of the neocon war hawks.
	I think in many ways she is worse than McCain and Graham.
	She certainly has had a bigger mouth about it.
	And she also has the ability to do it under the radar since she's a woman.
	And people give her a pass on that.
	They still have this false idea That women cannot be tyrants and dictators.
	Nikki Haley is going to show us the truth about that.
	We'll be right back. The Common Man They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	I want to talk a little bit about climate before we get into politics here.
	And yesterday as the show was ending, I talked about the key lie from the IPCC. And of course we have about 1,600-1,700 scientists who are pushing back against this, saying there is no climate emergency.
	These people are lying to us.
	But the key thing about that is not that we've got some really prominent scientists who are saying that now.
	We don't do science that way.
	You don't count the number of PhDs on one side versus the number of PhDs on the other side or even Nobel Prize winners and that type of thing.
	That's not science.
	That's academia.
	That is antithetical to science.
	It's really about the data.
	But there was a key thing, and yesterday was at the very end of the program, I cut it out and put it up separately because I wanted people to see it.
	And I think it is so important, I want to lead into this climate stuff, and I'm going And as a matter of fact, there's some actions that are taking place in Texas that need to have the same type of thing happening in other places in terms of trying to stop what Biden is doing.
	And he's actually got a goal to have 30% of the land, quote-unquote, protected.
	In other words, we're going to take 30% of it away from us by 2030.
	This has always been the plan.
	This is the UN Agenda 21.
	In the 21st century, we're going to push everybody off the land and into the cities, that type of thing.
	Got more specific, 2030, and now it's getting more specific by 2030.
	They want 30% of the land. And then what's it going to be by 2040, by 2050, and so forth?
	You will have nothing other than a little tiny area, a 200 square foot apartment in a city where they can monitor you.
	It is the Indian Reservation System with high tech.
	But going back to the source of all of this, And the key thing is that there's a CO2 that they call carbon.
	That is their key thing.
	Well, the IPCC, which is the organization in the UN that's been pushing this, as many people pointed out, look, the atmosphere is only 0.4% CO2. And that's an incredibly tiny amount.
	So I don't think that your global warming is driven by that, number one.
	Number two, as tiny as that is, the human portion of that is even smaller.
	And so the IPCC comes back and says, well, yes, that is true.
	And, you know, this stuff does get taken out of the atmosphere.
	The turnover time on average, they believe, is three and a half years.
	But then the IPCC says, but for humans, for human-generated CO2, it stays in the atmosphere.
	For hundreds or even thousands of years.
	And the scientists ask the questions, exactly how is CO2 different if it occurs naturally or if it is man-made?
	It's still CO2, still one atom of carbon and two atoms of oxygen.
	So, you know, what is it that is different about it?
	Well, there isn't anything that's different.
	CO2 is CO2, regardless of how it was generated.
	And it is going to stay there the same amount of time.
	So that's a fundamental lie that is just an easily debunked absurdity, and people need to understand that.
	He says, here's a simple question.
	Is a human carbon dioxide molecule exactly identical to a natural carbon dioxide molecule?
	And the answer is yes, of course.
	Well, if human and natural CO2 molecules are identical...
	Then their outflow rates must be identical.
	So where did this idea come from that if it's generated by humans, it's going to last for hundreds of thousands of years?
	Well, it's strictly political. He pointed out that in science, the scientific method says that you can't prove that a theory is 100% true, only that data supports it.
	But you can prove that it is false.
	Providing an example, he said, go back and look at Isaac Newton's gravity law.
	It was a preeminent theory for a very long time, but then Albert Einstein made a correction that disproved Newton's theory.
	You know, when I look at that, it's, like I said, we were talking last week about viruses and stuff.
	A lot of these things are abstractions of things that they cannot observe, really.
	And so we've seen that happen with subatomic particles, a nuclear theory.
	We've had the Niels Bohr atom that we all learned when we were in school.
	And then quantum physics came along.
	We had Isaac Newton's laws about gravity and physics.
	And then Einstein came along with his theory of relativity.
	But, you know, F equals ma squared still works.
	It's still used everywhere.
	And so even though Einstein may have refined it with some other things, the fundamental utility of Newtonian physics remains.
	It can be descriptive, predictive, you can replicate it.
	We're just talking about on a finer level.
	And the same thing is true of the previous versions of the atom.
	So when you look at the ideas about contagion and virus, these are abstractions.
	They may be useful ways to try to describe what is actually happening, that they don't really know what is actually happening.
	But expect all of these Abstractions to continually undergo change, because that's the nature of science.
	Science is constantly changing, and they're constantly challenging and refining the conventional wisdom.
	But he says, let's go back to the scientific method, for example.
	The IPCC proposed a theory, and if we can prove that it's wrong, we win.
	And I proved in that case that their theory is wrong about CO2 being different somehow.
	Natural CO2 is different from human CO2. Total bunk.
	And, you know, I don't know if they've proven how long it takes for this stuff to recycle through at three and a half years.
	We don't even know if that's true.
	Given the fact that they say that human CO2 could remain in the atmosphere for hundreds or thousands of years, Clearly, they made that up.
	If these people are liars making up stuff, did they make up the stuff about three and a half years either?
	Because one of the things that we know certainly happened after Climategate.
	Climategate was a big deal, and they were admitting to each other that their models didn't work.
	And Michael Mann was involved in that as an American.
	It was mostly something that happened in the UK, as we saw their emails.
	And so they came up with some fudging factors and concealed and lied about that.
	And he was able to keep his data from being seen.
	Something that you wouldn't do if you were an honest scientist.
	He fought very hard and he did win in court.
	And yet, all of this stuff that was central to his hockey stick Saying that there was a direct relationship between the amount of CO2 and temperature, that as CO2 was going to go up, the temperature was also going to go up in a corresponding amount.
	And that did not happen.
	CO2 has gone up, and there has been no correlation with the temperature to make that happen.
	So he said the prediction came from the same model that doesn't give humans producing 140 parts per million.
	He says it comes out closer to 30 parts per million, which essentially means that the IPCC is wrong about all this.
	Now, someone could ask, well, is the IPCC data correct?
	My answer is, I don't know.
	I don't know because the IPCC has used this very data to deceive the world.
	And I want to show that their logic is incorrect.
	Using their own data.
	And this is what we do sometimes when we talk about the hypocrisy of the elites.
	And you can't shame them about their hypocrisy of using private jets and all the rest of this stuff.
	You can't shame them about the fact that they're out there paying exorbitant amounts of money for mansions right on the seashore that their own people say are going to be underwater.
	They don't believe that. If they believed that, they wouldn't be buying this property.
	He said the IPCC was not set up as a scientific organization, it's a political organization.
	A political organization that's mission specifically was to convince the public that carbon dioxide was causing a problem.
	So they come up with these absurdities.
	The human CO2 is somehow different from naturally occurring CO2. He said that's the only reason for it.
	He said there is no climate emergency and that's important for us all to understand.
	Just remember those things.
	Remember those lies. You know, the 0.4% and the fact that they...
	I'm even thinking, is it 0.04%?
	I don't remember now, but it's an infinitesimally small amount because the human part of that is a small amount of that.
	But the easier to understand why is the idea that they would say there's something that is fundamentally different about human-produced CO2. So the Biden administration...
	Is that we've got to have land for our wind farms and for our solar panel farms.
	Lots and lots of it.
	And this article from The New American talks about how the Biden administration is misleading the country about the amount of land that they're going to need.
	And this is very important.
	This is going to be used as justification to get us off of the land.
	So many things about this all dovetail together.
	So Biden says, the Department of Energy, under Jennifer Granholm, they say, well, we're going to need by 2035, we're going to need about 19,700 square miles.
	Now, that would be a lot. That would be more than several of the smaller states combined.
	Much more. But that is still a lot and a lot of land, 19,700 square miles.
	That would be about, well, Rhode Island is only, I think, 1,500 square miles.
	Delaware is not much larger.
	Connecticut's not much larger.
	So you'd probably wind up having the combined land mass of Rhode Island, Delaware, Connecticut, New Jersey, New Hampshire, maybe even Vermont, I'm just guessing.
	I didn't calculate that out.
	I did go out and look at what real clear investigation said.
	They said, no, if you look at what these things are generating for the amount of land that, you know, how much energy is coming out of these wind farms and these solar farms, they said you'd need 134,000 square miles.
	Now, to give you an idea how much that is, That is pretty much all of the 11 smallest states combined.
	There's only 50 states, right?
	So that would be more than the combined land area of all of Rhode Island, Delaware, Connecticut, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Maryland, West Virginia, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, They need to take all of those states, kick everybody out of them, and put up solar panels and wind farms over the entire landmass of all those states in order to do this.
	Is that a workable plan?
	Well, maybe if you're looking for an excuse to enslave people in the cities and get them off the land, maybe that is a workable plan.
	But it is absolutely crazy.
	And I said even this figure is misleading, 134,000 square miles.
	Because that doesn't include all the land that's going to be needed for the new transmission systems that would have to connect to the energy.
	You know, those wind farms that a lot of billionaires got to be even more billionaire-y about in Texas, there was heavily subsidized infrastructure to pull the power from those wind farms for use.
	That was an unbelievable amount of money that was paid for by the state of Texas.
	But that also includes land that has to be there for that transmission system that would connect the energy created by the solar panels and by the skyscraper-tall wind turbines that fill the horizon.
	So again, the landmass of the Smallest 11 states all combined.
	And to show you what this happened.
	And Wales, they're now lowering the speed limit in general from 30 miles per hour to 20 miles per hour.
	It's not going to be long before Sidewalk Labs is literally going to be true.
	You know, you will. One way they can get you out of the car.
	Is just to continue to make it more and more useless.
	I'm sorry, you can't take the car in here.
	You can't park it there.
	You can't drive it that much faster than you can walk.
	And we'll keep taking the speed limit down.
	You know, going from 30 to 20?
	When do they go from 20 to 10?
	From 20 to 5? So, that's what is on its way.
	But let's... You know, when we look at what is happening in terms of the 30% of the landmass that they want to get, this is sent to me by a listener.
	Carol, thank you for sending this.
	And this is, by the way, she says she connected with Tony at Wise Wolf.
	So that's good. Here, we've got some financial news that we want to get into here as well.
	Tony Ardobin at Wise Wolf Gold.
	And, of course, you can get there with davidknight.cold.
	And we'll get to that in a moment, what is happening with money.
	But there's going to be a meeting in just a couple of days.
	Texas Agricultural Commissioner Sid Miller is going to host a summit that they call the Stop 30 by 30 Summit.
	And we need to be having these things in various states.
	This is going to happen September the 21st through the 23rd in Irving, Texas, in case you're in Texas.
	It's being put on by the American Stewards of Liberty.
	And the person who is Executive Director of the American Stewards of Liberty said, as an 8th generation farmer and rancher, we can't think of a more appropriate person to host this major property rights event.
	It's a property rights event.
	Opposing Biden's agenda to permanently, quote-unquote, protect 30% of our land by 2030.
	They mean to confiscate it.
	Yeah, we're going to kick you off the line.
	It's one of the things that, you know...
	One of the first parks that we had, you know, they set up the Smoky Mountain National Park this year.
	Love the Smoky Mountain National Park.
	But the federal government is making it more and more difficult to access.
	They had just started this year charging for the first time to get into it if you want to stop.
	You can drive through it because there's through roads that went through.
	There was an agreement with the state of Tennessee that they were not going to block it off and charge people for access.
	So they found a way around that.
	They said, okay, we'll just charge people if they stop.
	That's the Biden administration.
	But, um, going back to the 1920s and 30s, it really is kind of shameful.
	You go to the, it always makes me feel bad when I go to Cades Cove.
	There's a little loop you can go around and you can look at, uh, where people used to live in the 20s and 30s.
	Um, you know, little, uh, log cabin shacks, very crude, very small, uh, big cracks where the wind could get through.
	Maybe they did have some chinking that's disappeared, but it doesn't seem like it.
	But those people were living, you know, they were free.
	It was their land. They were poor.
	And the federal government came in and protected it by kicking these people off the land.
	And so you can go through Cates Cove and you can see where these people had homes and a church and they were a mill and doing all this type of stuff.
	And every time I look at that, even before all this Agenda 2030 stuff started, it always used to make me feel horrible for these people.
	It's like, yeah, I really like this park, but that's the wrong way to go about it.
	I hate eminent domain and things like that.
	And so now he's saying, well, we've got to take 30% of the land by 2030, a third of the country.
	And that's even more than, you know, they're talking about with 134,000.
	That's 11 states.
	That's 20% of the states.
	You take all of it. But those are the smaller states.
	So he's talking about grabbing even more than that.
	This summit will focus on strategies and policies to counter the Biden administration's unrelenting assault on private property rights.
	They don't want to just take your stove and your car and your air conditioning and heating and all the rest of the stuff.
	They want to take your land as well and lock you up in an Indian reservation-style thing.
	Along with Commissioner Miller, there will be a stellar lineup of national speakers sharing their expertise in educating the people in attendance, including state and local policymakers, farmers, ranchers, and concerned American citizens.
	Commissioner Miller brought common sense into state government, and when everyone was shutting down during COVID, he declared numerous companies and firms in the agricultural sector as, quote, essential businesses.
	Never forget that Trump and his President Fauci called you non-essential.
	That's a bigger slam than being called despicable by Hillary Clinton.
	Saving thousands of jobs, enabling many Texas businesses to keep their doors open.
	But again, they want to take 30% of the land.
	When we stop and think about it, you know, 134,000, I think the Square miles, according to real clear politics, but Biden wants even more.
	He's just saying that that's just for their wind farms and their solar farms.
	But that's about half of the land area of Texas, which is just mind-boggling.
	That's even easier for me to get my head around, because that's the thing about living in Texas.
	You have to drive for You know, five to eight hours to get out of Texas or to get to another place in Texas.
	So my uncle said when we visited, we were living there in the 1980s.
	He said, I've never seen so much, so little, so far between.
	Texas is gigantic.
	And of course, these land grab policies by Biden would take half of the area of Texas just for their renewable boondoggles, just to make their friends wealthier.
	And so the Babylon Bee has a satire.
	The auto CEOs are struggling with whether to replace striking workers with robots or with Mexicans.
	We really could go either way on this, said the Ford CEO, Jim Farley, while lighting up a Cuban cigar with a stack of $100 bills.
	On one hand, robots work perfectly and tirelessly without complaining around the clock.
	On the other hand... Biden is welcoming thousands and thousands of Mexicans across the border every day who will happily do these jobs for 32 cents per hour, 70 hours a week.
	So what should we do?
	This is a real conundrum.
	By the way, I guess what he eventually realizes is we don't need to build cars at all.
	You know, Biden is going to give us some kind of a monopoly concession to rent people golf carts by the hour.
	That's what these companies are going for.
	They're not car companies anymore.
	They've rebranded themselves, Ford especially, as a mobility company.
	That's one of the reasons why they're doing everything the government wants them to do.
	Because then the government is going to give them the capacity to rent cars to people.
	Ford, GM, Tesla, all of them.
	They don't want to sell cars.
	They prefer to lease them.
	And they prefer to lease it to you by the ride.
	We've been saying this for years, Derek Peters.
	They prefer to lease it to you by the ride.
	That's a much more profitable thing.
	And they're just doing everything the government wants to stop the production of automobiles.
	Because if they do that just the way the government wants, and the government's going to give them that kind of oligarchy, you know, they'll be one of the few companies that is allowed to do that.
	The key goal is to get rid of all private cars and have everything under some kind of a corporatocracy that is aligned and merged with the government, as is the Chinese model.
	And they will control all of your transportation.
	Again, the one thing that they could not control at all during the lockdown was the car.
	The car must go.
	It is essential to our individual liberty.
	At publishing time, says the Babylon Bee, the automakers decided to compromise.
	And so they're going to go with robots, but they're going to hire Mexicans to build the robots.
	Now, let's talk about Sadiq Khan in the UK. 430,000 air miles have been racked up since he was elected London mayor in 2016.
	And so, you know, 430,000 air miles, that is enough to travel around the world 17 times.
	And so if you stop and think about that, average that, that's over six and a half years.
	But what that means is that he's flying enough that he could fly two and a half times around the world every year on average.
	And pumping out tons of this terrible carbon, which is carbon dioxide.
	Not a problem at all.
	But you'll never shame them about any of this hypocrisy.
	As he's doing this, as he's traveling around the world in a plane, private plane mostly, he doesn't want you to take a single errand with your internal combustion engine car.
	No. Can't use it for work.
	Can't run an errand.
	Not even a short trip.
	Going to hit you immediately with a big fine if you move that thing at all.
	But he flies around the world two and a half times.
	So, again, when you look at the bottom line of all this, you're not going to shame them on the hypocrisy, but you can educate your fellow citizens about the fundamental lies.
	I mean, we have all these failed predictions and everything, but the thing about the CO2, that's why I wanted to go back and revisit this again today, very important.
	The fundamental lie behind all this is that they've got, they say that natural CO2 is going to precipitate out in three and a half years, but human CO2 is going to take hundreds, maybe even thousands of years.
	They don't even know. It's still there.
	It's never, as far as we can tell, never any of it's come out.
	Oh, really? Well, explain to me how CO2 is different based on, it's either CO2 or it isn't.
	It doesn't matter how it was generated.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	you. Making
	sense. Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	And also, Doug Alug, thank you very much.
	I appreciate the tip. Thank you.
	Let's talk a little bit about the other way to escape what these people are doing.
	Yes, we do need to organize.
	We do need to educate people about what this agenda is.
	As a matter of fact, that's the first time that I'd seen Biden come up with a number of taking 30% of the land and By 2030.
	To put it under his control.
	To protect it. You know the way they're protecting land in Maui and other things like that.
	They'll always find some excuse, some way to describe this.
	But of course, educating people about what their plans are is important, but we also need to do things on an individual basis.
	And the House Majority Whip, Tom Emmer, who was the number three guy, You have the speaker, you have the leader, and you have the majority whip.
	He's a guy who organizes people and kind of lobbies them to vote for whatever it is that the speaker wants.
	But he has taken the lead on this anti-CBDC bill.
	He is reintroducing this.
	He's done it in the past before.
	And I think it's important as an educational thing.
	It's not going to pass through the Senate because the Democrats want CBDC. They're not even making any bones about it.
	And, of course, it's not anything that Trump wants to talk about.
	And we've had the only candidates who've talked about this have been DeSantis, Ramaswamy, and RFK Jr.
	And, you know, DeSantis was the first one to talk about it when he did his dog and pony show.
	He called it Digital Big Brother Money.
	He gave his presentation about CBDC, what he wanted to do at the state level to stop it.
	And then, of course, the first question he gets from the press is, but what about Trump's indictment?
	That's all anybody wants to talk about.
	Don't want to talk about solutions to any problems that are being introduced by the Democrats.
	It's simply what is happening to Trump.
	And so we'll talk about what is happening to Trump in a moment here.
	But led by House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, The Central Bank Digital Currency Anti-Surveillance State Act resurfaces on the House floor seeking to put the brakes on the Federal Reserve's expiration of a digital version of the dollar.
	And so, as they point out in this article from Reclaim the Net, they said 130 countries making up 98% of the global economy are involved in some level of implementing CBDC. And, you know, I would imagine that's about the same number who participated in the pandemic lockdown.
	Just think about that.
	You know, a vast majority of all them marching in lockstep for the lockdown.
	You know, stomping on your face.
	Here, put this mask on, you know.
	And all the rest of this stuff.
	And these are the same people, the same countries.
	About 98% of the global economy that wants to have CBDC. Republicans like Emmer have put forth an argument that CBDCs would only serve to intensify surveillance activities by the state, which is why China is taking the lead in this.
	This updated bill primarily seeks to prohibit intermediated CBDCs, those issued by the Fed but managed by financial intermediaries such as retail banks.
	A strategy that China employs for its digital yuan.
	Again, 2020 was the year that the world became China.
	That was a January 2021 video that I put up, and YouTube took that down.
	Took it down. Isn't that amazing?
	You know, Russell Brand has gone from 2017, about the time all this censorship and canceling stuff was started, he's gone from a million people just on YouTube following him and watching his videos.
	He's gone from a million in 2017 to over 7 million today.
	Now, why is that?
	Has he now ceased to be useful to them?
	Was he useful to them?
	Of course he was. It was a limited hangout.
	And he was letting it all hang out, as a matter of fact.
	And, you know, as vulgar and as depraved as this guy was, oh, they love that.
	They want that. They want that for you.
	And if he starts talking about politics, if he starts telling people the truth, they're going to cancel him.
	And so that part of it is true.
	And I see pretty much even with alternative media, people saying, well, you know, he's just being canceled.
	We've got to support him. I don't support what Russell Brand did.
	Not then, not now.
	He finally started telling the truth.
	So what? He's been lying to you since 2017?
	He went from 1 million to 7 million people?
	I got kicked off because I said 2020 was the year that the world became China.
	So, what is it?
	What is about that?
	I didn't have that many people following me.
	And... Anyway, that is the reality of what is happening.
	And so when we look at this, what I think they're describing here is the wholesale thing that ran out, the wholesale phase of this.
	And if you look at this, you know, at all the countries around the world, and this has been done by the Atlantic and others, they say, well, here's the status of CBDC in all these various countries.
	And so it begins with a feasibility study.
	It began, the next step is implementation of some of this stuff.
	Models and that type of thing.
	You have a step where they roll it out just before the final full-on CBDC. They have a wholesale step, and that's what FedNow is.
	Where they have the central bank starts, you know, rolling out an early version of CBDC with the retail banks.
	And then the next step is to have what they call FedCoin in the United States.
	But that's the full-on CBDC. So they have already implemented in the United States.
	Everything has been implemented up to the penultimate stage.
	The ultimate stage of FedCoin is the only thing that's left.
	And so I think if I read this correctly when they talk about the intermediaries and retail banks, I think that that is what he's trying to stop.
	Maybe there is some other aspect of this, but he said this in his statement.
	He said the administration, the Biden administration, has made it clear.
	Biden is willing to compromise the American people's right to financial privacy for a surveillance-style CBDC. That's why I am reintroducing my landmark legislation to put a check on unelected bureaucrats and ensure the U.S. digital currency policy upholds our values of privacy, individual sovereignty, and free market competitiveness.
	If not designed to be open, permissionless, and private, in other words, emulating cash, he said, a government-issued CBDC is nothing more than a CCP-style surveillance tool that would be used to undermine the American way of life.
	Well, I think the appropriate way to do it is the way that DeSantis did it.
	He said, we're going to go on the UCC code and we're going to say it will not be legal tender for any transactions in this state.
	Every state's got a UCC code.
	And if you remember, that was first talked about by Christine O. She said, I just saw this bill and I vetoed it.
	But she said, I've been told that this has run out to a couple of dozen states already, which would, and the bill was going to make cryptocurrency illegal, and then specifically make CBDC legal.
	Now, she just vetoed that.
	What DeSantis did was he said, well, we're going to do just the opposite.
	We're going to say that cryptocurrency can be used and cash can be used, but CBDC cannot be used.
	That's the appropriate way.
	But I think that the CBD approach that they're trying to take is the best argument for owning gold or silver.
	But I'll give you the inflation argument.
	By the way, if you want to get gold and silver, davidknight.gold will take you to Tony Arterman's Wise Wolf Gold.
	I've known Tony for a very long time.
	I really do trust him. He's got great prices, a great business, and of course he's been very innovative in terms of trying to help people accumulate stuff.
	That's what his Wolfpack thing is set up.
	So that you can buy a little bit of gold each month and just stay up on a program.
	Also to create a community of people who can talk to each other about what is happening.
	So again, you can find all that at davidknight.gold.
	I'll take you straight to Tony.
	But let's take a look at the inflation side of this.
	Yesterday was National Cheeseburger Day.
	Cheeseburger, cheeseburger. Just for McDonald's.
	And what they decided that they would do on National Cheeseburger Day, well, I guess National Cheeseburger Day is beyond McDonald's.
	McDonald's decided that they would make a cheeseburger available for only 50 cents.
	Normally costs up to $2.79.
	And they said, in this article from CNN, Well, 50 cents is only 45 cents more than what the chain's original hamburger cost in 1948.
	So it cost a nickel in 1948.
	And so even with their discount, which you would only get, and of course it's over with now.
	I didn't want to tell you this yesterday because I didn't want to tempt anybody to buy a McDonald's cheeseburger.
	It's not good for you.
	But it was limited to one burger per person and you had to sign up on their app in order to get it and so forth.
	But even at that discounted price, It's 10 times what the hamburger was.
	Do you think you got 10 times the amount of burger?
	Or maybe one-tenth of the amount of burger?
	And if there's any burger in it at all, what's in this stuff?
	I mean, you look at... The quality is a whole other issue.
	But just take a look at the inflation.
	If, you know, from a nickel to $2.79, okay?
	The price in dollars...
	Has gone up by a factor of 55.
	Ignore the quality going down.
	The price, assuming that, you know, it was the same quality, which it's not, that it was in 1948.
	Because at that point in time, it was a locally owned business.
	And then Ray Kroc got it, and it's, you know, gone full on corporate.
	So now it's 55 times more expensive in terms of US dollars.
	It is more expensive in terms of gold too, but instead of being 55 times more expensive as it is in fiat dollars, it's only 8 times more expensive in gold.
	So, another reminder of inflation.
	This story from Burning Platform.
	The biggest con job in banking is the savings account.
	And he wrote this because now you've got some savings accounts that are now actually paying more than a tiny fraction of 1%.
	But it's still not keeping up with inflation.
	And they appear, if you go with the official version of inflation, the official story of inflation is that we only have 3.7%.
	But that's not true.
	We all know that. Living in the real world, we know that that is not true.
	And so some of them are saying that under special circumstances and with strings attached, maybe with certificates of deposit, you can get up to 5%.
	But that's not typically what you're going to see.
	And that is still losing money as far as the inflation rate is going.
	Again, if you want to try to beat inflation, you're not going to do it with a savings account.
	You're going to do it with gold.
	And you'll be able to get all those cheeseburgers in the future that you want.
	Without any problem.
	But more importantly, you're going to be able to do it with privacy because the CBDC thing is full on.
	There's no question about it.
	There's just some lying denials from these people that that is their plan, but we know exactly what their plan is.
	He made his plan essentially public.
	When he told all the three-letter agencies underneath the executive branch to, you know, do a study and report back to him on one of four areas back in March of 2022.
	How are we going to completely restructure the financial system, first thing?
	How are we going to enforce it, Department of Justice, FBI, IRS? How are we going to actually implement it?
	Who's going to write the code? And then the fourth one was, how are we going to sell it to the public?
	Oh, we'll do it with climate change.
	That's the lie that they're going to use.
	So protect yourself from inflation.
	Protect yourself especially from this central bank surveillance currency.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, let's take a look at Donald Trump.
	And of course, over the weekend, we had the Family Research Council...
	And they had a straw poll, and Donald Trump spoke with them.
	He also spoke over the weekend about abortion to some mainstream press.
	And then this article from The Guardian, evangelical Christians need Republicans.
	Does the party need them?
	Well, I don't know if the party needs Christians or not.
	But I can say this.
	Christians do not need the Republican Party.
	And Christians do not need Trump.
	I don't need a president.
	I've got a king. And I don't look to these people for my salvation.
	I think it's really pathetic that so many people do.
	And I think it's really pathetic and hypocritical.
	It's as hypocritical as what we see from Sadiq Khan as he's flying around the world two and a half times every year in his planes.
	Tell you, you can't turn on your car and move it five feet or you get a fine.
	It's just as hypocritical for these Christians.
	To be talking about family and all the rest of this stuff and supporting Trump because he's made it clear where he is on all these different issues.
	And he's making it clear where he is on abortion as well now.
	When Donald Trump recalls, says the Guardian, how his three U.S. Supreme Court justices helped repeal the national right to abortion, there was never a right to abortion.
	It was a Supreme Court opinion.
	And you had the Supreme Court finally decide that they would pay attention to the Tenth Amendment.
	What I was saying all along, I said, this is a state issue.
	The federal government has no authority to define abortion.
	And that's the other big problem that the Christians don't understand.
	They don't understand politics.
	They don't understand how this stuff works.
	They don't understand that if they make it federal again, and they're being pushed into this by people like Trump and Lindsey Graham, all these grifting politicians, Pence is another one of them, all these grifting politicians who want this to be the issue, a wedge issue, so you'll vote for them.
	They've lost that issue.
	And even some of these pro-life organizations want to make it a national issue.
	And as I've said before, if you come up with, instead of a Supreme Court decision, if you come up with a federal law that would prohibit abortion, I guarantee you, New York, California, name them, all these blue states, they're going to ignore that just like they've ignored the laws to prohibit medical marijuana or recreational marijuana.
	They'll do their own thing.
	The states that will follow it when the Democrats get in and they say, okay, now we're going to remove all restrictions on abortion and make that the federal law.
	Then all of the Republican-led states will obey it.
	That's the way this is going to work.
	It is a trap.
	Anyway, so...
	Guardian says, even as the former president basked in the religious rights moment of triumph, he went on to deliver a warning.
	Quote, I will say politically, it's very tough.
	It's a very tough decision for some people, but very, very hard on elections.
	Very, very hard, he said.
	We had midterms and this was an issue, you know.
	No, Trump, you were the issue at midterm.
	You were the issue.
	You and your failed celebrity candidates like Dr.
	Oz and Blake Masters in Arizona, who goes back and, as soon as the Supreme Court takes away Roe v.
	Wade, he goes back and changes his website and all the rest.
	Bunch of phony celebrity politicians.
	You were the problem.
	You have cost the Republican Party a majority in the Senate now, several elections in a row.
	You've lost your election.
	You lost the Senate.
	You lost the Senate again this last time.
	You kept a big red wave from happening because of your candidates, your key candidates that you chose.
	And so the Democrats are now choosing Trump because they know that he's their ace in the hole.
	They've openly talked about how they vote in the primaries and they think, look, we all see what happens every time he gets indicted.
	The Democrats are not that stupid.
	Even as James Carville said, he was so excited to see that they were going to impeach Biden.
	He said, how did we get this lucky?
	He knows it's going to energize the base to see Biden impeached.
	And they know that it energizes Trump's base to see Trump impeached.
	Everybody knows it.
	Why are we pretending that his popularity is anything other than the fact that he's presented himself as a victim?
	Many politicians who are pro-life do not know how to properly discuss this topic, said Trump, which is so important to the people in this room, so important to millions and millions of people in our country, Well, you know what, Trump?
	It's also important to tens of millions of babies who are literally ripped apart.
	And that's the truth that needs to be unleashed.
	I don't need Trump to try to explain this.
	Trump has got no moral foundation.
	He's got no compass. It's not about anything other than him.
	So he doesn't care about babies.
	But if people were to see the procedure or other things like it, you just unleash that truth on people.
	And you don't need somebody like Trump out there.
	Somebody who's trying to pull it back.
	So then Guardian talks to some of the people who are there.
	One guy, 68 years old from Maryland, said, I want the candidate that's going to win.
	I'm very focused on winning this year.
	So if I had to pick, I'd pick Trump because he's winning.
	And, you know, the polls all tell us that he's winning.
	So he should be our candidate.
	Yeah, you believe the polls? Do you believe that the only thing that's important is winning?
	Maybe you heard that from Alex Jones, 40 chess.
	It doesn't really matter what he does.
	We've just got to win. So even if he tells you that you're not essential, he locks you down and he produces tens of billions of dollars to give the drug companies to create a worldwide poison.
	It's just all about winning.
	You know, it was winning for him to praise Fauci and to do everything that Fauci said.
	Another guy, actually, no, the same guy still said, well, you know, I'm still against abortion, but it's okay to be a little bit pragmatic and to win.
	Yeah, situational ethics.
	Jimmy Hammond, 74, pastor from Lumberton, North Carolina, Vietnam War veteran, is adamantly opposed to abortion.
	He said, to me, it's not a political issue.
	It's a biblical issue.
	Abortion is not right.
	It's killing a child.
	Such a simple truth.
	You know, the truth just cuts straight through if you say it.
	Doesn't it? And so Trump, who bills himself as the most pro-life president ever, he says, what I'll do is to negotiate so that everybody is happy.
	Oh yeah, he's such an amazing negotiator, isn't he?
	He knows people so well.
	That's why his staff and his cabinet was so effective.
	Here's what he had to say in the interview.
	Mr. President, I want to give voters who are going to be weighing in on this election a very clear sense of where to stand on this election.
	I think they're all going to like me.
	I think both sides are going to like me.
	What's going to have to happen is you're going to have to...
	Kristen, you're asking me a question.
	What's going to happen... Come up with a number of weeks or months.
	You're going to come up with a number that's going to make people happy.
	Because 92% of the Democrats don't want to see abortion after a certain period of time.
	If a federal ban landed on your desk, if you were reelected, would you sign it at 15 weeks?
	Are you talking about a complete ban?
	A ban at 15 weeks.
	Well, people are starting to think of 15 weeks.
	That seems to be a number that people are talking about right now.
	I would sit down with both sides and I'd negotiate something and we'll end up with peace in that issue for the first time in 52 years.
	I'm not going to say I would or I wouldn't.
	I mean, DeSanct is willing to sign a five-week and six-week ban.
	Would you support that? You think that goes too far?
	I think what he did is a terrible thing and a terrible mistake.
	Isn't that amazing? He banned abortion.
	That's horrible. I would get everybody together.
	You know, he's already done this once before.
	Remember the gun control stuff?
	Remember we had Dianne Feinstein that next time when she could still, you know, was still kind of there?
	And Chuckie Schumer and all these people?
	Yeah, you know, we could do that.
	You just tell me what you want and we'll come up with that.
	I think we should take the guns and do the due process.
	Yeah, sure, absolutely we can do that.
	Everything's on the table. Everything is negotiable.
	Because he doesn't have any principles.
	He doesn't obey the Constitution.
	He doesn't care about your individual liberties.
	Everything. Your life, your job, your business.
	It's all negotiable to the people that he wants to impress.
	So, yeah, we'll just come up with some arbitrary number as to when we can kill babies.
	But, you know, what the Sanctus did, that's just sanctimonious to stop abortions.
	Can't do that at all.
	Well, this was sent to me by a listener recently.
	We said, well, it looks like Lexit is waking up.
	And that's, you know, we've had Blacksit, which is, you know, Blacks exiting the Democrat Party.
	These are Latinos exiting the Democrat Party.
	And yet, they do have some principles, unlike Trump.
	And this one lady did a video talking about what Trump just said in these comments and at the Family Research Council meeting where he was addressing nominal Christians.
	He's talking about he's going to sit down with the left and the right to come up with a time frame to get an abortion that's going to make both sides happy.
	First of all, Donald Trump, didn't you say that life begins at conception because God says that?
	What happened to your godly values?
	Are you just going to throw them away just because you're so desperate to become president?
	You're so desperate to be liked by the left and the right?
	No, you stand up for God and you stand up for the truth.
	Most importantly, you stand up for life, even if they like you or not.
	Like, who cares? As long as you stand your ground when it comes to your morals, you shouldn't care what anybody says about you.
	I can't believe I heard that from you.
	And you know, you're trying to throw shade at Ron DeSantis, like, because he had a six-week abortion ban?
	Talking about that's too extreme?
	Get it together, Donald Trump.
	Get it together. Well, I'm afraid he's got it together.
	We just need to understand the game that he's playing.
	And she gets it.
	But what I thought was, I thought that was excellent.
	And I thought it was equally interesting to look at the comments.
	And so I took screenshots of some of these comments.
	Look at this. Get it together, Trump.
	Those are some ridiculous comments on abortion.
	We won't support that. Pro-life.
	Okay, that's in favor of it, right?
	Then another one.
	Y'all stop acting like y'all don't know who Donald Trump is.
	He is Trump. He has to play the game.
	See, he's got to play. It's 4D chess.
	You know how hard it is to get two people to get along.
	Now try a country. Not everything he says is going to be what you like.
	So one of the things we're going to have to do is just let people chop up babies.
	Yeah, because Trump's got to win.
	He does. That's the most important thing.
	And if Trump wins over these babies' dead bodies, that'll just be fine.
	But I think he means well, and he will do his best for Americans.
	He's the most transparent of all the candidates, and that's sad.
	Yeah, it is sad how transparently egotistical and narcissistic he is.
	It really is. The only thing that matters to him is his ambition.
	That's what 4D chess is about, folks.
	So one in favor of, one against, but listen to this.
	Abortion might not be right, but the freedom to choose based on personal beliefs is how we do things in America.
	Small government. If the WHO, the UN, and the WEF take over, we will have much bigger issues.
	And... Another one.
	Trump, stop talking.
	It's the one thing that lost you votes.
	Another one. The country needs to be united.
	You need to see that clearly.
	If you think you can do a better job, then you go and run in politics instead of criticizing people who are actually out there putting their heads in a chopping block so you can sit on the sidelines as an armchair critic while doing nothing.
	I wonder what this person, Spadina Fort York, I wonder what that person actually does.
	Is she sitting on the sideline?
	Carping about this?
	Man in the arena, I suggest you go back and look that up.
	Look up that speech, little girl.
	Another one, Trump is the most pro-life POTUS in U.S. history.
	He's the guy who said, this is another person, who said in 2016 he'd appoint judges who would gut row and he followed through.
	And then one comment after the other, unfollowed, unfollowed, unfollowed.
	People don't want to hear that about Trump.
	They've got an image of Trump that they've created.
	That has absolutely nothing to do with the man, with his character, with his actual actions as president.
	None of that stuff matches up with their deranged image of Trump.
	And they don't want to hear it.
	Trump's circumspection may have cost him the vote of Ken Oliver, 59, from Williamsburg, Virginia, who said he prefers the clarity of DeSantis on abortion and on gender.
	Yeah, talk about gender.
	Trump has been one of the earliest adopters.
	Of transgender nonsense from the very beginning.
	He campaigned about how much he loved the LGBT. He had merchandise about it.
	He talked about his diversity, inclusivity, and equity hires who were LGBT. They didn't look like Bidens, you know, who were like some kind of cartoon LARPers.
	But, yeah, they were still LGBT. Okay.
	This person said, former President Trump, despite all the merits and many good things he did, is relatively weak in comparison to other candidates, especially DeSantis, on these issues, which are core issues for social conservatives.
	He says, we need to build a consensus around limitations to abortion, whether it's six weeks or 15 weeks or 20 weeks.
	Why shy away from that?
	Said one other person.
	Trump remains well ahead. He has roughly 35 percentage point lead over DeSantis with the evangelical Christians in general.
	And with the ones who showed up at this Family Research Council thing, he had like, you know, it was like 60 some odd percent, and that was the 35 percent lead that he had over DeSantis and Ramaswamy.
	Despite having been found liable for sexually abusing New York women in 1996 and indicted over hush money payments to an adult film star because, you know, he's special.
	Stars that they can grab women by the...
	Well, that's what...
	If you look over the last million years, I guess that's been largely true.
	Not always, but largely true.
	Unfortunately or fortunately.
	And you consider yourself to be a star?
	I think you can say that, yeah.
	Yeah, I think I can do anything I want.
	And so voters say they're choosing a president, not a pastor.
	No, you're choosing a man who's proven that he has absolutely no character, no principles, no anchor, no rudder.
	He is going to blow whichever way he wins.
	He is going to be the most unpredictable person you've ever seen in the Oval Office if he were to get in there again.
	You're choosing a man who betrayed you in 2020.
	Who betrayed you as he broke his oath to his wives, as he then trolled them, and as he broke his oath to the Constitution.
	Evangelical voters may find their leverage over Republican candidates waning.
	Why? Well, because they're weak as well.
	They don't stand for anything, as you just saw.
	Well, you know, I just want to win. I don't really care about any principles.
	I identify myself as a Christian.
	I'm here at this Family Research Council thing and Pray the Vote Summit.
	I'm here to pray the vote, but I don't really care whether or not we kill babies or not.
	We just got to win this election.
	That's what I want.
	You think God answers prayers like that?
	People say, you know, I don't really care what you say.
	You're not my Lord.
	Trump is my president, and I'm going to follow him.
	Trump's real base of support in 2016, said The Guardian, came from a rising group within the GOP whose impact has largely been unnoticed.
	Republicans who hardly ever darken the door of a church, of a synagogue, or a mosque.
	And that's really where we are.
	Do you think that the Founding Fathers, if they saw that clip that I just showed you about Trump grabbing, do you think that they would be surprised that our country is in the situation that it's now now?
	They would say you have absolutely no moral foundation in this country.
	No wonder you're where you are right now.
	So Trump is at 64% for the Family Research Council's straw poll at the Pray the Vote Summit straw poll on Saturday.
	That truly is sad.
	By the way, the Family Research Council is now, for tax purposes, a church.
	Do you realize that?
	They got their 501c3 status as a church.
	Yeah, the church of politics.
	This is why Christianity has no influence.
	So Trump declared that he would launch a special task force also to rapidly review the cases of people that he led to January the 6th who are rotting in jail, many of them with life sentences.
	You know, Trump's January the 6th crime was not against the federal government.
	There wasn't any insurrection.
	This was a riot. He led these people like sheep to the slaughter, threw them under the bus, refused to do anything to help them while he still had another two weeks in office.
	The people that he committed the crime against The very same people who are out there still egging him on.
	Truly amazing. And so this is what he said.
	Donald Trump promises a task force to review and to potentially pardon every Biden administration political prisoner, including pro-life activists held in jail.
	Well, again, he could have certainly done something about the January 6th people.
	And we're seeing the same types of things happening with pro-life activists.
	People who are in their 70s being given what is effectively life sentences for doing nothing other than being too close to an abortion clinic or something like that.
	Or showing how babies and their bodies are being burned after they've been ripped apart at an abortion clinic.
	This is what's happening in D.C. And so you have people like Wayne Allen Root.
	Again, if Trump doesn't win, America is finished.
	This is his second one. This is part two.
	I mentioned this headline before.
	You know, we have Wayne Allen Root out there who absolutely hates everything that Trump did in 2020 but doesn't attribute any of it to Trump.
	You know, the lockdowns, the masks, the social distancing, the vaccine, truly hates the vaccine, but he loves Trump.
	How is that?
	Again, he is like a suckerfish on a large shark.
	He just longed for the ride.
	Wayne Allen Root, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, these people are all just on there for the ride.
	Suckerfish. And the biggest sucker is going to be you if you listen to these people.
	If Trump doesn't win, says Wayne Allen Root in 2024, there will never be another Republican president.
	Anyone who doesn't understand this is blind, deaf, and very dumb.
	Just like Mike Huckabee says, well, if Trump doesn't win, the next one is going to be decided by bullets and not ballots.
	Folks, if you listen to these people, you're very dumb.
	And so he goes down a list of all the different things that Democrats have been able to do, but he doesn't attribute so many of these things to Trump.
	He says they rigged and stole an election, including the presidency, with mail-in ballots.
	Does Wayne Allen root, is he really that ignorant that he doesn't realize that it was Trump who did the mail-in ballots?
	Truly, it's amazing. And the ballot drop boxes and harvesting and all the rest of the stuff, which Trump says, oh, we're going to do that now.
	I'm not going to clean it up. We're going to out-cheat them.
	Maybe this is why the guy went bankrupt running a casino.
	They've opened the borders.
	Well, you know, Trump never did anything.
	He didn't build a wall. He didn't even get rid of DACA. But now this is Biden's problem.
	Democrats have forced vaccines and all the rest of the stuff.
	Look. Who made the poison?
	Who pushed the poison?
	Who's proud of it? Our schools have been destroyed, and so forth.
	Well, you know, Trump now says he wants to get rid of the Department of Education.
	How many times have we heard that story?
	He was president. He didn't reduce his budget.
	You know, had an opportunity to do something about it.
	You know, Betsy DeVos was a secretary.
	And she talked about, you know, reducing a little bit of stuff, trimming it on the side.
	But, you know, then after she got kicked out, she got really brave.
	You know what this reminds me of when I see Trump and Betsy DeVos and these other people?
	Have you ever seen, and you can see a lot of these videos on YouTube, You'll have a couple of dogs, and there's a fence, right?
	It's a movable fence that slides.
	And these dogs are just snarling and snapping at each other on that fence.
	And then somebody who's taken the video starts to open that fence up.
	And when the fence is open, they stop with all the snarling and all the biting and all the ferocious behavior.
	And they're like, oh, okay, you know.
	And then you put the fence back, and the behavior starts again.
	This is Republicans before and after the election.
	The election is when the fence is in place.
	And then when you pull the fence back after they're elected, they're all fine.
	You know, we're all buddies with this stuff.
	And not going to do anything at all about that.
	And then he finishes, he's got a long list of all these things, his grievances.
	And some of them are specific to the Democrat Party.
	But he says, and then we come to COVID-19, the big thing, right?
	Which he doesn't attribute any of it to Trump.
	Wayne Allen Ruth. He says, if you're not blind, you can see we are going back any day now to mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and quite possibly even lockdowns, you know, like Trump did to us.
	Companies and schools will almost certainly start requiring the booster, a booster that has never been tested on a single human being.
	Just like Trump set that precedent.
	But of course, you know, it's Trump or the world is over.
	Folks, the Republican Party doesn't need Christians, and Christians certainly don't need the Republican Party.
	Our tools are mighty.
	And our prayers become weak when we use them in the way these people at the Family Research Council are using them.
	To cheer on People who, to win at any cost, where the end supposedly justifies the means?
	God doesn't honor prayers like that.
	Where do these people come from?
	I don't know. Then you've got Laura Loomer, another double thinker out there.
	Angry at Megyn Kelly.
	Megyn Kelly is vaccinated by her own admission.
	She made the choice to vaccinate herself.
	See how Laura Loomer sounds like a Democrat when she wants to defend Trump?
	She should take personal responsibility instead of using COVID as a way to attack Trump.
	When DeSantis pushed the jab too, Laura Loomer is totally lost.
	Her whole life revolves around politics.
	She's as pathetic as Hillary Clinton.
	The politics of meaning.
	There's no meaning to politics, folks.
	We have to understand the danger of politics.
	We have to understand what these criminals are trying to do in the district of criminals.
	But we should not be seduced by this.
	And we should not become, you know, ringwraiths.
	All these Boromirs that are out there.
	She said, I never took the jab, and I'm as pro-Trump as they come.
	She cannot, Laura Loomer cannot admit, Did Trump had anything to do with the jab?
	And then I saw this.
	Infowars. Watch this.
	Trump knocks Megyn Kelly interview out of the park.
	Well, no, he didn't.
	She gave him alibis.
	And he kept saying, I didn't do what Fauci said.
	She let him get away with that.
	No, he did everything. He even campaigned on what Fauci said.
	And so, you want to go back and you want to look at the legacy of Donald Trump?
	And take a look at this exchange, for example, right?
	What is Infowars doing?
	Well, actually the same thing that Megyn Kelly is doing.
	Because she was flattering and sucking up to Trump before the interview to get the interview.
	And then after the interview, oh, he did so good.
	Oh, you know, you really turned this thing around.
	But in that interview, you know, Trump just flat out lied.
	So she says the truth is, though, not only did you not fire Fauci, who is lobed by many, many millions of Republicans in particular, but also by some Democrats.
	And Trump says, by the way, by the way, I didn't do anything he said.
	She let him get away with that. He did everything, he said.
	You made him a star. This is the criticism of you.
	You made him the face of the White House Coronavirus Task Force.
	You think so?
	Said Trump. She said he was at every press conference.
	You actually gave him a presidential commendation before you left office.
	Would you like to have a duo? Oh, I don't know who gave him the commendation.
	I really don't. You know, he's as big a liar as Fauci.
	Fauci not only gave him all the information about lockdowns and social distancing, he also taught him how to be a better liar, too.
	Because there's nobody a better liar than Fauci.
	But again, Megyn Kelly just gushed about Trump.
	Oh, your poll numbers went up.
	She's just a media suckerfish on this shark that is going around.
	And so then the Washington Post comes back and attacks DeSantis for attacking, contrasting himself with Trump and the vaccine.
	Headline is, bashing COVID boosters, DeSantis contrasts himself with Trump.
	And now this worries experts.
	And so they say, well, look at this.
	In order to get after Trump, who did the shots?
	DeSantis is attacking these shots and telling people the truth, that they're not tested, that they're dangerous.
	And even though they were not tested, we've got a lot of data showing what they're doing to people.
	And so the Washington Post says that's really dangerous.
	And they get a lot of pharmaceutical experts to come out and talk about how dangerous that was.
	I will not stand by and let the FDA and the CDC use healthy Floridians as guinea pigs for new booster shots that have not been proven to be safe or effective.
	Not if Biden is doing it.
	He did that for Trump.
	But to his credit, he was the first one to pull back from some of these measures.
	But then also he is afraid to actually go fully there.
	They will, as they point out in this thing, the Florida Surgeon General, Joseph Ladipo, a DeSantis appointee, issued a booster warning shot discouraging young men from getting it.
	But they're not blocking it.
	And you've got a lot of GOP county parties that are saying, we've got to stop the shot.
	It's killing people.
	Stop it. The government would do that about anything else.
	The government would do that about seatbelts, about airbags, about baby cradles.
	They'd do it about airplanes, but not about the vaccine.
	Why is that? Would it be enough to say, well, you know, we've had several of these 737s.
	We've had two of them crash. And I know it's rare.
	There's been 8,600 flights and only two of them have crashed.
	But, you know, everybody on board died.
	But, you know, so I would recommend that you don't fly those planes anymore.
	But I'm not going to stop them from flying.
	Would that be acceptable? That's essentially what DeSantis is doing.
	Trump is taking credit for having designed the plane because he got out of the way and let them do whatever they wanted.
	You know, because Trump shuts down the testing, because Trump shuts down the protection of people.
	He takes credit for the design of the plane because, you know, he gave him, what, $20, $30 billion to build the plane or something if it was the same as it was with the pharmaceutical companies?
	No, what you need to do is to investigate the Trump murders by lethal injection.
	That's what you need to do.
	And anything less than that, I'm not going to cheer.
	So the IRS is now halting another Trump legacy.
	The pandemic era small business tax break.
	We should spell that E-R-R-O-R. The pandemic era tax breaks for businesses.
	Because of so much fraud, the IRS is finally shutting that down.
	But this is only Biden.
	Trump had nothing to do with any of this stuff, the CARES Act, none of that.
	As a matter of fact, when he was opposed on it by Thomas Massey, the only one in Congress to oppose him.
	Remember how furious Trump was who wanted to get him out?
	Now Jenna Ellis, who was his lawyer, isn't it interesting how all of Trump's lawyers call him a narcissist and don't want everything to do with him?
	And of course, this was also predictable because Jenna Ellis has now been indicted in Georgia, not getting any help from Trump.
	She said this, the total idolatry that I'm seeing from some of the supporters is really troubling.
	Yeah, exactly right.
	So, she said he is a malignant narcissist, that's her term, who cannot admit mistakes.
	All of his lawyers say this.
	Ty Cobb is a deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting, except out of his own perceived self-interest or revenge.
	She calls him a malignant narcissist.
	I simply cannot support him for elected office again, she said.
	She said, why have I chosen to distance?
	It's because, frankly, the malign, narcissistic tendency to simply say that he has never done anything wrong.
	She said, before that man, Trump, needs to be president again to escape the quote-unquote witch hunts, that man needs Jesus again because his ambitions would be fueled by showing some self-awareness.
	And he won't do it because Trump cannot admit that he is not God.
	Wow. His lawyer.
	She said, I know him well as a friend and as a former boss.
	I have great love and respect for him personally, but I've chosen to distance because of that, frankly, malignant narcissistic tendency to say that he's never done anything wrong.
	Well, the sad thing is, is that she supported him after he flipped to globalist.
	He went over to the globalist side, as we all saw at the beginning of 2020.
	And she joined up with him to push the stolen election after he did the vote by mail.
	So just understand what is coming from.
	But she's still telling the truth about him here.
	She said, the total idolatry that I'm seeing from some of the supporters that are unwilling to put the Constitution and the country and the conservative principles above their love for a star is really troubling.
	And I think that we need to, as Americans and conservatives, and particularly as Christians, take this very seriously and understand where we are putting our vote.
	And then she had an interesting question.
	Not exactly the question that I would have.
	She launched into the Republican National Committee, and she says, what happened to the millions raised by the RNC in November and December of 2020?
	The Trump team never saw a dime of that help.
	Ooh, that's not even what happened.
	If you remember his Save America, you know, Alex had to stop the steal.
	I don't know what he was collecting millions of dollars for, but supposedly Save America was supposed to pay Jenna Ellis and some other lawyers.
	And so maybe this is what Trump told her.
	I was supposed to get the money from the RNC and they didn't give it to me.
	But folks, as I've said many times, the first $8,000 that you would give to Save America to fight, you know, in November and December for Trump to stay in the presidency to lead you in to January the 6th, the first $8,000 that somebody gave went 100% to Trump and the RNC. He split it with them.
	He took most of the money and gave some of the money to the RNC. It didn't go to the RNC first, as she seems to be implying here.
	It went to Trump and he split it with the RNC. And then if you gave more than $8,000, you give $8,001, that $1 goes to the legal defense.
	But the rest of it was pocketed by him.
	Just like Alex pocketed the Stop to Steal money.
	And pocketed by the RNC. And so she's asking, where did that money go?
	That's a good question. But she's got the flow of the cash wrong.
	There's $250 million that was taken in by the Save America PAC. What was done with that money?
	That's a good question. And it's not just money that was taken by the RNC. It was Trump who took that money as well.
	And so, a January 6th rioter was convicted and sentenced in secret.
	And nobody will say why.
	This gets more and more strange, doesn't it?
	Boy, you want to talk about agent provocateurs, you want to talk about double-crossed betrayal, you want to talk about people being thrown under the bus, you want to talk about the entire conservative movement being thrown under the bus, being targeted as extremists and terrorists by these agent provocateurs, and by the people who told them to come to D.C. when there was nothing that could be done in D.C. except to get them in trouble.
	1,100 people already being given jail sentences, many of them life sentences, even if it's just a few years because they're elderly.
	Others being given decades in jail.
	And here's a guy, Samuel Lazar.
	He appears to have been tried in secret and under seal with no explanation.
	And Lazar, 37 years old, of Ephrata, Pennsylvania, was arrested July 2021 on charges that he came to the Capitol on January the 6th, dressed in tactical gear and protective goggles, and used chemical spray on officers who were desperately trying to beat back the angry Donald Trump supporters.
	There is no public record of a conviction or a sentence in his court document.
	But the Bureau of Prisons told the Associated Press that the man was released from federal custody this week after completing a sentence for assaulting or resisting a federal officer.
	Lazar was sentenced in Washington's federal court March 17 to 30 months in prison, but there's no public record of such a hearing, and he's been jailed since July 2021.
	So, what is that about?
	I don't know. I mean, was this guy an agent provocateur who went too far?
	Hard to say. There's so much skullduggery and secrecy in all of this stuff, isn't there?
	And then in terms of the people who were going to jail with the Biden administration for life sentences, essentially a jury, a D.C. jury just convicted two 70-plus-year-old pro-life activists, and a D.C. judge immediately ordered them into prison.
	The announcement by the D.C. U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves, whose wife is a radical pro-abortion activist.
	So let me just say that as we're looking at Donald Trump and, you know, Ramaswamy and these other people, I'm going to get rid of the Department of Education and all the rest of this stuff.
	Be very careful about that.
	We have heard that lie over and over again since the Department of Education was created.
	It was created in 1980 while the presidential election between Carter and Reagan was going, and Reagan said he was going to end it.
	So we have been promised that a Republican is going to end the Department of Education since its very inception, its creation.
	Charlotte Iserby went there to help end it.
	Phyllis Schlafly got involved in it, both of them, pointing out Charlotte Iserby and her book, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America.
	How has the Department of Education corrupted education by money?
	That's how it's always done.
	That's why when people in 2020 said, it's not Trump, it's the Democrat governors.
	Well, the Republican governors are doing the same thing, and both of them were being paid by Trump, as I've said many times.
	You know, the money comes out of Washington to get people to do things that they don't have the ability to order you to do.
	They bribe you. If they want to continue the war on drugs, they have civil asset forfeiture, and they tell you, go ahead and steal stuff from people.
	You don't even have to convict them.
	You don't even have to charge them with a crime.
	Just steal it, and we'll cut the loot with you.
	You know, the federal government will.
	If they want you to put boys in the girls' bathroom, they've been giving you money for a while.
	And now that they've established that dependency, after people become dependent on the federal money for the schools and all the rest of this stuff, they say, if you don't put the boys in the girls' bathroom, I'm going to cut that money to you.
	That's the way that it works.
	First, they bribe you.
	They get you addicted to this money, dependent upon this money.
	And then they say, now you're going to do this next thing, which you never would have done if you'd known that at the beginning.
	But now that you're dependent on it, Well, I don't want to lose that money, so I'll do what they say.
	Now, when we talk about the Department of Education, and that has been how it has manipulated education from Washington.
	It's been with that seductive money.
	And so Trump is vowing to be a champion of families who make the courageous choice to homeschool.
	Folks, this is a trap.
	This is a trap from Trump.
	I've warned about this going back into the 1990s.
	I would warn homeschoolers, you're pushing for inclusion into sports and for other things like this, and you want the government to give you money?
	I said, you be very careful because that's going to come with some big strings attached.
	It is a bait and switch.
	Once they get you on the hook, they're going to reel you in.
	And so he promised, as a part of this pitch to evangelicals, Trump promised to, quote, support the growing homeschooling movement, to be a champion for families.
	He said, to every homeschool family, I will be your champion, he said.
	And so he said, he noted that the rates of homeschooling have soared in the wake of the China virus, as he calls it.
	No, they've soared because of his lockdown.
	His and Fauci's lockdown.
	They've soared because the lockdown, the silver lining of the lockdown, was that people could see what was happening in their child's classroom for the first time.
	They could always say when they heard it, well, it's not in my child's classroom.
	It may be in the same school, it may be in the same school district, it may be in the state policy, it may be the federal government, but it's not in my child's classroom.
	Well, they could see that that was the case.
	It was his globalist pandemic.
	It wasn't a China virus.
	And so now what is he proposing?
	Well, he says, I want to allow homeschool parents $10,000 a year per child, completely tax-free, to spend on costs associated with homeschool education.
	I hope you understand what a trap that is.
	Beware the bribery.
	Because it will come with financial controls.
	In order to give you that $10,000, you will have to file reports and tell them what you did with it and give them an insight into what you teach your kids and all the rest of the stuff.
	And you don't need their money, folks.
	You really don't need their money.
	If you're hung up on money, then you're not going to homeschool your kids.
	It's just that simple. The people who do it, who are blessed by it, who have commitment to it, I've seen it over and over again, are not the people who have, they're independently wealthy, you've got a husband who is making a lot of money and the wife can just stay home and do whatever she wants.
	Those are typically not the people who are homeschooling.
	You know, it's a given that poor people give more money than rich people do.
	Way, way, way more as a percentage of their income.
	You know, when you look at Taylor Swift, right?
	She does her tour, and she gave some of the people on the bus thing, you know, $10,000.
	She made a billion dollars on that tour.
	She gave them a tip of like, you know, one one-thousandth of what she made.
	One one-thousandth of a percent, I should say.
	Yeah, yeah. You know, not 20% tip at the restaurant.
	No, I'm going to give you one one-thousandth of a percent tip.
	It'd be like going to a restaurant and getting a meal and you leave them a penny or something even less than a penny.
	Rich, you know, it sounds like they're giving a lot of money, but they're giving a very small percentage of what they do.
	And I just mentioned that because the people who are successful homeschooling are doing it because they love their kids, not because it makes financial sense.
	They sacrifice for their family and that's what makes it work.
	And it's that love, that's devotion to your kids, to God, all the rest.
	That's what's going to make it work.
	Not a subsidy from Trump.
	That is a trap.
	Absolutely a trap. And he goes on to say, well, we're going to give them benefits, these homeschool students.
	We're going to let them participate in athletic programs, clubs, after-school activities, educational trips, and so forth.
	Folks, you don't want any of this.
	The athletic programs, the clubs, the after-school activities, the educational trips, it's why you want to get your kids out of school.
	You don't want any of this stuff.
	And I've been saying that for over 30 years to people.
	And he said, don't vote for Democrats.
	They're trying to destroy you.
	Trump is a stealth Democrat.
	Trump is the fifth column.
	And in everything that he does, there's this subversive lie involved in it.
	Nobody would have put up with the stuff that Trump did.
	As a matter of fact, even though he did it, you still got people like Wayne Allen Root and all these conservative media saying, oh, Democrats, Biden did that.
	Can't admit that Trump did it.
	Take a look at this story here.
	Illegal aliens dressed in camouflage scale a border wall with ropes as a smuggler guides them.
	And they got it on video. Okay.
	It's Gateway Pundit. Gateway Pundit for whom Trump can never do anything wrong.
	Now, let me just say this.
	I've said this from the very beginning.
	I said, look, the wall is not a solution.
	It might impede some of the flow, but it's not a solution, even if it was going to be built.
	And he never built it.
	He never built it.
	He repaired some wall, and he added another 40 miles of wall.
	This is as ridiculous as that river barrier that Greg Abbott did, the Guadalupe.
	About 1,000 feet of river barrier.
	And then the feds make a big deal out of it.
	Again, it's like the two little dogs barking at each other through the fence.
	And they removed it.
	Folks, it was only a thousand feet long.
	Not even a quarter mile long.
	That's not going to stop anything.
	As a matter of fact, they put it over the deep part of the river where people would have to swim.
	Where they wade across, there's no problem at all with that.
	And so Trump puts in 40 miles, and he's, you know, said, we're going to have a wall, but it's going to have a big, beautiful door.
	Well, the big, beautiful door is about 75% of the distance of the border is a door.
	And the thing that is causing all this is the magnet.
	They have not addressed the problem of immigration.
	And the wall was never a solution.
	Always set. People go over it, they'll go under it, they'll go around it, especially if you don't finish it.
	The lockdown hysteria cost government the little credibility it had.
	Says, real, clear wire.
	But it didn't cost Trump any credibility, did it?
	He gets to do all this stuff.
	Change the rules of the election.
	We've now had another election that's run with the mail ballots and all this stuff that he started.
	And there was no pandemic.
	And they're going to continue to do this.
	He goes on to meet the press this weekend and says that he's not afraid to go to prison.
	He knows he's not going to go to prison.
	I don't believe Trump is going to go to prison.
	As I said before, they crossed one Rubicon by using lawfare.
	But it's another thing completely to send Trump to prison.
	Because they have all got big criminal skeletons in their closet.
	They don't want to go that far.
	They want to use lawfare against him to make sure that he doesn't win the presidency.
	They want him to win the nomination.
	But that'll keep him from winning the presidency.
	But they do not want to put him in prison.
	Because Biden does not want to go to...
	None of these guys want to go to prison.
	And if they start that kind of warfare, then that's likely going to happen to them.
	But Trump is not afraid to go to prison.
	But his followers get life.
	His followers get tortured in jail for years after he threw them under the bus.
	So the person says, so how are you, Kristen Welker, ask him if he worries at night about winding up behind bars.
	And he says, when you say, do I lose sleep?
	I sleep. I sleep.
	Yeah, he doesn't worry about any of this stuff.
	Because I truly feel that in the end, we're going to win.
	We have many people, and it's my choice, and it was my decision, but I listened to some people about that election thing.
	Of course, we can say the same thing about the lockdown and the pandemic.
	We've got many people, but it was his decision, wasn't it?
	He won't take the credit for the January the 6th thing, but he won't take the credit for the plandemic.
	You know, we've got a lot of people. He went on to say, they turned out to be rhinos.
	They turned out to be not so good in many cases.
	I didn't respect them.
	But I did respect others, you know, like Fauci.
	I respected many others that I said the election was rigged as well.
	So she asked him if he was acknowledging that he didn't win.
	He says, I'm not acknowledging. No, I say I won the election.
	I'd like for somebody to ask him, instead of about this election thing, Will you acknowledge that your vaccine, the vaccine that you say you're the father of, will you acknowledge that that kills?
	Of course he won't, because that's his ego.
	On Rockfin, thank you very much.
	Dougalug, I really appreciate that.
	Thank you. And Jason Barker, good to see you, Jason.
	Thank you for the tip.
	Let us know if there's any update about Angry Tiger, who was taken to the emergency room yesterday.
	I really would like to know if there's been an update about his condition.
	So please pray for Angry Tiger.
	We don't really, at least I don't know.
	Maybe some of you do. If you do know, please let us know on some of the chats there.
	But thank you very much.
	And we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Making Sense.
	common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, Jason Barker wrote that Angry Tiger is back home and resting up.
	So that's good news.
	Thank you, Lord. So good to hear that.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is going, because there's been some updates with the Russell Brand thing.
	And I think this is important.
	I think I started the show with it yesterday because I thought it was the most important thing.
	Russell Brand's father says, come on, with all the stuff that's happening, isn't there more important stuff to talk about?
	Interesting, Lauren Boebert said the same thing.
	Can't you find something else to talk about besides me?
	And the problem is that this really is at the center of a lot of things.
	This is part of the cancel culture, and yes, they are trying to cancel Russell Brand.
	But why do we let him bewitch us?
	Why are we loyal to him?
	That's the headline from Daily Mail, how Russell Brand...
	Amassed a legion of loyal, bewitched fans.
	They have a lot of ways that they can bewitch us, right?
	Well, I'm, you know, Democrat, or I'm anti-Democrat, or I'm Republican, or I'm anti-Republican, or I'm woke, or I'm anti-woke, and on and on.
	And so, everybody's choosing up sides.
	And if there's anything I could do, I would try to get people to stop paying attention to this tribalism.
	That's ripping us apart and pushing us into a civil war, and it is deliberate because these people are going to use this as part of this transition and this fourth turning to destroy our society.
	And people don't understand how they're being led like sheep to the slaughter, just like they were on January the 6th.
	All of this rabid partisanship and all these excuses around Russell Brandt that are politically aligned.
	The attacks on him are politically aligned?
	Yes. Yes. But the excuses for him are politically aligned as well.
	When you go back and you look at how the BBC gave him limousines that he's picking up a 16-year-old girl with and all the rest of this stuff, why'd they let him get away with that?
	Well, because he was their guy.
	He was useful to them at that point in time.
	The same reason that Tucker Carlson and Andrew Tate and Alex Jones, all these people, are now cheering him on because he's useful to them.
	The BBC needed viewers.
	Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Andrew Tate need viewers.
	They need followers. They need fame.
	They need fortune. Same as the BBC. That's all this is about.
	Why are you letting yourself get caught up in this stuff?
	He's got 11 million followers on Twitter, 7 million on YouTube, 4 million fans on Instagram, and so forth.
	Again, as I said at the beginning of the program, this is from 2017.
	He had a million people there in 2017.
	That's about the time the purges started.
	It was 2017 when my program started, and it grew very rapidly.
	Within a couple of months, I had 60,000 followers on YouTube, and I was getting 250,000 views.
	And then all of a sudden, the views start going down, and the followers continue to go up, and then the followers capped.
	And then a couple of months after that, it just got completely purged, you know, along with the Infowars purge.
	But they'd already started on that before that.
	So how is it that Russell Brand goes from 1 million to 7 million over that same period of time?
	You know, over these years.
	That they've been purging everything.
	Well, because he was a limited hangout.
	Because he told people what they wanted people to hear.
	He gave them a limited version of what was happening, just like Joe Rogan does.
	And he also, like Joe Rogan, pushed them into depravity and drug use and all the rest of the stuff, making it a joke, making it cool.
	You know, Joe Rogan wants you to take mushrooms.
	And Russell Brand wanted you to involve in sex of every kind without any consequences.
	That was a promise.
	As a matter of fact, he was held up as, just like Andrew Tate, your path to success.
	It's to use and abuse women and have absolutely no restrictions on sex.
	That's the way you become successful.
	You know, that's the message.
	Sometimes not even subliminal.
	In the case of Andrew Tate, it was right out front.
	You make a lot of money off these women, you know, being a pimp and using them to create pornography.
	Somewhere along the way, Russell Brand woke up and became a powerful dissenting voice who no longer served their agenda, said one fan.
	Well then, how long was he serving their agenda?
	And what agenda does it serve to excuse his behavior?
	Is that perhaps the most dangerous of the agendas, the satanic agenda to control us?
	Rosie Holt, a comedian that I don't know, all I know is that she's a comedian, but she wrote this on Twitter.
	She said, I guess the lesson here for kids is, if sexual misconduct rumors have been swimming about you for ages, then set up a cult on YouTube to support you when the allegations become public.
	Well, they weren't rumors, quite frankly.
	They were publicly done.
	It was his shtick.
	In the same way that Howard Stern does it, right?
	Same type of thing.
	Howard Stern is a leftist.
	They're leaving him alone, right?
	I guarantee you...
	That Howard Stern would be immediately taken down if he started talking conservative politics.
	That's one of the reasons why he's out there trash-talking everybody who's anti-vaccine and all the rest of this stuff.
	He knows that for his own safety, he has to toe the line of the demonic party.
	Because as soon as he gets off of that reservation, they got more than enough to hang him with.
	Because he's just like Russell Brand.
	And so, as they're posting one person after the other, just like Alex Jones, I stand with Bran.
	He is completely innocent.
	Well, no, he isn't. He hasn't been found guilty yet.
	But he certainly is not innocent.
	There's absolutely no way that you can say this guy is innocent.
	He's taken innocence. That was one of the things that he was looking for in this 16-year-old girl, she said, was her innocence.
	He joked about raping and killing women.
	About having sex with audience members and homeless people and with children in resurrected interviews.
	But hey, it was all just a joke.
	It's just really funny, isn't it?
	Yeah, I mean, Hollywood has a free license to show any kind of depravity, whether it's violence or sex or drugs or anything like that.
	I mean, it's just a movie.
	Come on! Let's get real.
	It's just a movie. Except it has an effect on people, doesn't it?
	But it was his trademark.
	It was the source of his success.
	So he said, the audience roared with laughter when he says, oh, and I've raped someone once.
	And then a long pause.
	And they're all laughing about that.
	And then I killed her afterwards, he said.
	See, it was just a joke.
	In the same video, he also joked about ancient Greeks having sex with children while creating math.
	Mathematics. He said, they didn't mind it, did they?
	Oh, they were very clever, weren't they?
	And then he mimicked having sex.
	And he says, I've done another triangle with little kids.
	This is great. Do the kid with a triangle.
	That's not too much. And he joked about adults, such as babysitters, performing sex acts in front of children, including him.
	This was all okay with the BBC. This is all just fine with YouTube.
	The people who will censor you, not for your depravity, and for your satanic leadership, but they'll censor you for telling the truth about their global Trump poison.
	It's all okay with the MAGA cult today.
	See, that's the key thing, right?
	All these people say, well, look, they let him do this stuff for the longest time, and now they're coming after him because he's in our politics.
	And that's right. And it is hypocrisy on their part.
	But is it hypocrisy on the part of the MAGA cult as well to defend him?
	So now you defend this guy?
	You defend this guy who always joked and perhaps did the same things that Jeffrey Epstein was always talking about?
	You have these fantasies that are sold to you by Michael Flynn about how Trump is leading this secret thing, and he's rounding up all these pedophile rings.
	You know, the same stuff that Steve Pachenik put out about the election.
	Oh, it was a sting. And Trump is out there.
	He's already rounding up all these criminals who stole the election from him.
	It's all pure fantasy.
	That's the amazing thing to me, is that how they can make these stories so similar to each other, And people don't catch on.
	They don't realize that Steve Pachenik, a CIA agent on Infowars with Alex Jones and Owen, is pulling their leg just making all this stuff up.
	And you had a lot of people.
	Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Schaefer.
	You had Steve Quayle who joined in on that and repeated it without any proof.
	And we knew it was a lie.
	And then Alex kept selling that.
	And they've been doing that with the Jeffrey Epstein stuff as well.
	The idea that this is all being rounded up.
	They're completely blind to the fact of Donald Trump's friendship with Epstein and the pictures that we see of Melania with Epstein and flying on his plane, and they pay no attention.
	You know, the two favorite candidates of these people are Trump and RFK Jr., who were Epstein passengers.
	The cognitive dissonance, the double think that is there is just astounding.
	And the idea that, well, hey, these people were fine with what he was doing, and now they're coming after him.
	And now because he's saying what the MAGA people want, they believe he ought to be left alone.
	They're no different from the BBC. They're no different from YouTube.
	YouTube and BBC were just fine when Russell Brand was doing what they wanted.
	Now that Russell Brand is doing what the MAGA people want, You ought to be left alone by YouTube and by BBC. Production staff who worked with him have detailed how they were allegedly roped into finding him sex partners from the audiences of his programs.
	In a deleted YouTube interview with fellow comedian Herring Brand, who also calls himself a, quote, sex narcissist, unquote, says, look at the woman in this room, the women.
	Even a bold estimate would be that I've slept with half of them currently.
	Later, he was asked about using homeless people to promote his Messiah tour.
	He had a Messiah tour.
	I mean, I didn't really follow this guy.
	Well, I look at the stuff that is coming out that he's done openly.
	I mean, it's not somebody saying, well, you know, I was around there.
	I saw this happen in the back room.
	This is what he's doing on TV. And he's got a Messiah tour.
	They said, you used homeless people to promote your Messiah tour.
	Is it exploitative when a millionaire comedian uses homeless people to promote his Messiah tour?
	And then he said, quote, Oh, you should have seen what happened after the video.
	And then he mimicked having sex with them.
	And then stubbing out a cigarette on them.
	He says, Who's going to care?
	Who are you going to tell?
	If society cared, you wouldn't be homeless.
	That's one of the reasons why I spent time on that essay yesterday.
	I thought it was very interesting.
	You know, the whole idea that in Rome, it was fair game if somebody was poor or a child or weak.
	It was only considered to be rape if somebody really cared about them, if they were connected to a powerful family or something like that.
	But the ordinary people, you just take whoever you want, and there's no consequences.
	You see where he's coming from?
	This is the re-paganization of America.
	And it was celebrated.
	It was promoted by the BBC for money.
	In the same way, the people on the right are promoting Andrew Tate and Russell Brown now for fame, for following, for fortune.
	His father has defended his son.
	Again, saying what I said before that Lauren Boebert said.
	Is this seriously the most important thing that's happening in the world right now?
	Yes. Yes.
	Because it is the epicenter of our sex-obsessed society that is turning to children now in its obsession.
	Because you go down this path, you always got to find a new thrill, right?
	So now we're going for the kids.
	And that is a result of all the stuff that's happening with the trainees and the gender mutilation and the grooming of kids in our government schools.
	That is a logical consequence of the sexual revolution that began in the 1960s.
	This is where it all goes to.
	So yes, this is the epicenter of what is wrong.
	The sickness that is at the heart of our society is shown by people like Russell Brand and Andrew Tate and Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones and the rest of these people.
	It is the sex-obsessed West, and it is why Western civilization is collapsing and will be destroyed by God if we don't change this stuff.
	And maybe it's too late already.
	Who knows? It's not too late for you as an individual, but it may be too late for our society.
	So it shows the amount of this amoral political cult, both left and right.
	So his dad, who says, is this the most important thing happening right now?
	His dad puts out, he says, the Russell Brand vendetta, says Russell Brand's father, is like a man who owns an orchard being accused of stealing an apple.
	Well, I think you can steal an apple if it's not yours, isn't it?
	It doesn't matter how many apples you own.
	You can steal an apple from somebody else.
	See, one of the key things about this, if we want to talk about apples, and of course it wasn't an apple, it's always depicted as an apple, the Garden of Eden, right?
	They ate the forbidden fruit.
	It wasn't about the fruit.
	It was about the rebellion to God.
	And that's what this is about, quite frankly.
	It's about our society, an open rebellion to God, a society that is not only, we haven't forgotten God.
	Yeah, we're thumbing our nose at God.
	And I just have to say, when he wants to talk about this, the guy who owns an orchard being accused of stealing an apple, well, the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree, does it?
	You know, I've got an apple.
	I've got an orchard here. I should be able to steal your apples as well.
	It reminds me of the story of King David and Bathsheba, right?
	Nathan the prophet comes to him after he has committed adultery with Bathsheba and gotten her pregnant.
	In order to cover it up, He brings her husband, who is a warrior, brings him home, hoping that, you know, that will give him cover, that the baby's not his.
	But instead, the guy is very loyal to him and doesn't even want to sleep with her, and so then his next plan is to kill him in battle.
	Betray the guy who's fighting for him, one of his mighty men, one of his, you know, his Navy SEALs, if you will, right?
	His elite troops.
	And so after that, Nathan comes to him, and he says, the prophet Nathan, he says, you know, there was a rich man, he had a lot of cattle, and he had a lot of sheep.
	And then there was a poor man who only had one lamb.
	He kept it in his home, and took care of it in his home, along with his children.
	He shared his food with this little lamb.
	He drank from his cup and even slept in his arms.
	The lamb was like a daughter to him.
	And then the rich man has a visitor who travels him and they're going to have a celebration and they're going to have a feast.
	But instead of taking one of his animals, any of his cattle, or any of his sheep, he takes the lamb that meant so much to this poor man, and he uses that for the dinner.
	And so, at that point, David is incensed.
	And he says, he has to die.
	He has no pity.
	And Nathan said, you are the man.
	This is what his father thinks is fine.
	He's got an orchard, so you ought to be able to go over and steal an apple from somebody, right?
	This is when we look at the values that people have.
	This father, who's now 80 years old, is the one who more than anybody else produced this monster that we call Russell Brand.
	These people have forgotten God.
	They've forgotten the lessons of God.
	They have absolutely no accountability, they think, to God.
	They think they can do anything that they wish.
	Truly is amazing.
	And then, that was not...
	You want to talk about his dad's influence on his son?
	This is from the Daily Mail.
	In his book, he talked about his father's influence on him.
	Russell Brand said that he used to watch porn videos at his dad's house.
	When he was 17, Brand and his father went on a trip to the Far East, and he got three prostitutes, and he said, my dad set about unwrapping his two prostitutes, and the third one was his.
	And that's part of what his father introduced him to.
	He said, by the end of the holiday, he said throughout the holiday, there were all these different prostitutes happening all the time.
	He said, my sexuality, by the end of that vacation, again, he's 17 years old, and his father is the one who's doing this with him.
	He said, my sexuality had morphed forever.
	From bewildered innocence into something that was more complex and rapacious.
	Rapacious. You know, as in raping or something, you know.
	But again, this is his father.
	So anyway, four women, including one who claimed she was sexually assaulted when she was 16.
	The BBC is now facing urgent questions after it was claimed that Brand used his company-provided BBC car service to pick up the young girl, the 16-year-old girl.
	She described, she said that when she was 16 years old, she said that Brand was preoccupied with her being innocent and pure and referred to her as the child.
	Alice described his behavior toward her as grooming.
	Because Brand would allegedly provide her with scripts on how to deceive her parents into allowing her to visit him.
	Same thing our schools are doing.
	This is why we call it grooming, right?
	They're doing that with a transgender agenda.
	And I wonder just how many parents who are so upset, and rightfully so, about this LGBT grooming, how many of them are going to defend Brand because he says the truth about the vaccine?
	There are plenty of people who are saying the truth about the vaccine.
	They're not out there raping children.
	Why do we defend this man?
	Why do we make him our messiah on his tour, our hero?
	The hypocrisy is astounding.
	From the MAGA cult.
	I'm done with these people.
	If you support Trump, don't watch me because I'm fed up with this stuff.
	She said, it was always the same car, and I knew that it was a BBC car.
	Another company, Bon& Jay UK, which produced his Big Brother stuff.
	That's another thing, you know, Big Brother.
	That was...
	Getting people accustomed to all of this stuff as well.
	And it's interesting that he was involved with so many different Big Brother things.
	He was involved, you know, he did some Big Brother spinoffs and everything.
	Big Brother's Big Mouth, Big Brother's E-Forum, and all the rest of the stuff.
	But I've said many times that I think the BBC's Big Brother was a deliberate, predictive programming.
	It came out just before social media became practical.
	And what they did was they got people used to, oh, look, these people are nobodies, but they put them in this reality TV show, and they show everything that is going on in their life.
	And I mean everything. No privacy.
	You know, let's put up pictures of everything.
	And as people looked at that, and they saw these people who had no skills, nothing at all special about them, but they became stars.
	And all that was done just before they rolled out social media.
	And then what does everybody do?
	They engage with social media.
	The young people engage with social media like they're on a Big Brother show.
	I'll show you everything, right?
	Everything about my life.
	Because that'll make me famous and I'll get followers.
	And it was a big part of that.
	And of course, his depravity was a big part of that as well.
	But I find it interesting that he's right there along with all this Big Brother stuff at the very beginning.
	Because this is very programming in what they were doing.
	Ex-staffers claim that Brand got them to act like pimps by getting the numbers of women in the audience and passing notes to them from the presenter.
	Get their phone number, give them notes.
	They never cared about it before.
	But now they do because of his politics.
	And now because of his politics, the right, who is very upset about kids being groomed, they don't care about any of this stuff about Russell Brand.
	So now the right gives them a pass.
	So when you, and again, as manic as they are about pedophile rings and Michael Flynn and all the rest of this stuff, Even when he was picking up, had BBC picking up this 16-year-old girl, his management team said, hey, it's not a good look, quote-unquote.
	It's not a good look to be dating a 16-year-old girl.
	And they told him to pretend that she was his goddaughter or his niece.
	Well, again, this is also something we've seen, of course, from Jimmy Saville, right?
	Famous pedophile.
	He was always protected by the BBC, even after he died.
	There were some people who did a special about him to expose it, and it was shut down multiple times by BBC management.
	And investigations at Scotland Yard were shut down by the higher-ups as well, because these people control the upper echelons of all the institutions, whether it's entertainment, or law enforcement, or government, or academia.
	They control these upper levels.
	And so I remember when all this stuff happened with Jimmy Saville, Saville, you know, and the royal family.
	Conservatives were just raging against Saville.
	How could the BBC do something like this?
	How could the royal family be involved with this guy?
	Well, I feel the same outrage with the MAGA people.
	We're sucking up to people like Andrew Tate and Russell Brown.
	Seriously. I mean, I can't believe it.
	On Rumble, thank you very much.
	Thank you very much, SubZero.
	That is very generous. I appreciate the tip on Rumble.
	Also on Rumble. Radice Bro, thank you for the tip.
	He says, remember the RNC had their J6 prisoner booth?
	That's right. With Marjorie, MYG, I think you mean Marjorie Taylor Greene, taking a photo op.
	They were always going to let them rot in prison for the political issue to resolve.
	Imagine being held hostage for a vote.
	Yes. I remember that one guy put up a thing at their, and that was the same one where they had the The golden Trump idol, you know, so it's a joke, right?
	No, it's a golden idol of Trump, even though he's, you know, he's got his pants are down around his ankles, but he's wearing red, white, and blue underwear.
	So that makes it okay. It's a joke, right?
	Like Russell Brand. Yeah, as long as we joke about the pedophilia, as long as we joke about the rapes, as long as we joke about the idolatry, it's all okay.
	It's just a joke. No, it's really what you think.
	BBC and Channel 4 are accused of enabling the Predator because the TV bosses did nothing after the staff complained.
	And again, just like they did with Jimmy Savile.
	Both the broadcaster and the production company were jointly responsible for duty of care and for standards to be upheld during the production.
	And as one former BBC One controller, Lorraine Hegesy, said this.
	She said, he went from being a heroin addict live on air on MTV, a sex addict live on air on E4, to a predator live on air on Radio 6 and Radio 2, and he kept progressing.
	Nothing held him back.
	So he thought he could do whatever he wanted.
	And he was allowed to say the unsayable.
	He was allowed to do the unthinkable.
	And he consistently got away with it.
	Until he said what?
	Until he attacked the vaccine.
	And now because he's attacking the vaccine, the people who love and support the creator of the vaccine want to give Russell Brand a pass.
	On being a live heroin addict, a live predator, who was just flaunting all this depravity to everybody all the time.
	It's just amazing to me. The more I look at our society now, the more disgusted and amazed I am.
	Everything has been turned upside down and inside out.
	He said he was a victim of a coordinated attack from mainstream media outlets, the Times, the Sunday Times, the Channel 4 dispatches, and that there was a, quote, serious and concerted agenda to control his voice.
	Yes. Yes.
	So what? Just as there was a serious concerted agenda to enable him to spread this satanic depravity.
	To their audiences. From Big Brother through all the rest of this stuff.
	He was modeling the behavior that we see in kids now.
	This stuff is not innocent.
	You know, we look at these violent events, and I haven't gotten to what happened over the weekend.
	You know, you got a couple of kids live streaming it, again, on social media.
	Live streaming a murder.
	You know, they're joyriding and doing all this stuff and cutting people off.
	And then they see a guy...
	Riding his bike. This is in Vegas.
	And it turns out the guy is in his, I think, 64 or something.
	He's a retired police chief.
	And he's out riding his bike on the side of the road.
	Hey, run him down.
	You know, just like they're in a video game or something.
	And they run him down at full speed.
	And he goes flipping back into the car.
	Breaks the windshield. And he goes rolling over.
	And they live stream that.
	Where do they get these ideas?
	Well, it's from the media that they consume.
	The entertainment they consume.
	The video games that they consume.
	Yeah, I know I sound like a get-off-my-lawn old man, but I'm fed up with this stuff.
	So yeah, get off my lawn.
	Get off of the video games.
	Get off of the BBC where they put people like Russell Brand and Jimmy Savile in front of you.
	Get off of the conservative media that excuses this stuff while at the same time organizing people To oppose the grooming that's being done in schools and child trafficking in Jeffrey Epstein, but then they support it if they're conservatives.
	So evidently, the only crime of Jeffrey Epstein was that he was not a Trump supporter.
	Is that right? Is that the real issue?
	I guess. He didn't have enough conservative friends and he didn't speak up politically.
	If he would have spoken up politically, then he would have been protected against all this stuff, you see.
	Because then they couldn't come after him, because then it'd be a conspiracy, an agenda to silence him.
	Yeah, it is a conspiracy to silence him, and it was a conspiracy to put him in your face to start with.
	Elon Musk says, of course, they don't like competition.
	He also defended Brand, and he said, no more canceling.
	Enough is enough. This is the guy, the phony guy, Elon Musk, who still does shadow banning.
	He's all against canceling.
	He's got shadow banning and all the rest of this stuff.
	Andrew Tate told his followers he would hold an emergency meeting on Sunday evening to tell everybody the truth about what is happening to Russell Brand.
	See, he's always going to, just like Alex, Andrew Tate will use this stuff.
	He'll attach himself to it to gain audience and follow him.
	He says, I know things that I shouldn't know.
	Well, he does things that he shouldn't do as well.
	Right? And he may have this come up as well.
	So, the surprising thing about this, when I looked up, you know, I've heard some of these people say, why are you talking about this thing now?
	It's like 20 years later, statute of limitations, all the rest of the stuff.
	You know, there is no statute of limitations on rape in the UK. And there shouldn't be.
	But there is one exception to the statute of limitations, and you won't believe it.
	There's one limitation in the field of sexual crime.
	And that is offenses that took place between 1956 and 2004.
	Cases that are supposedly consensual sex with teenagers aged between 13 and 15.
	And in those cases, they have a statute of limitations of one year.
	So I guess the message is to people in the UK, if you're going to rape somebody, make it a child, right?
	But it also has a time period there.
	But the 13 to 16 thing, well, I don't know.
	This young girl was 16.
	I don't know if that's called statutory rape in the UK or not.
	Minors are not supposed to be able to consent to things like that.
	Just like they should not be able to consent to mutilation, sexual mutilation that they are grooming the kids to do in the schools.
	on Daily Skeptic.
	The headline was, this is no victory for women.
	They said, some will no doubt argue that this is progress, that men are being held to account and women are being given a voice.
	But let's get real.
	Going from girl power to victim feminism in the space of two decades is not a great leap forward for women.
	Far from recognizing women's agency, victim feminism, brings with it calls for more policing of the interactions between men and women.
	Fear and mistrust rule the day.
	The current fashion for trashing the sexual revolution leaves women not empowered but infantilized and presumed to be in need of consent classes at university, chaperones on dates, or intimacy coaches on film sets.
	Well, I don't agree with that at all, quite frankly.
	That is not the problem.
	Feminism is the problem.
	You want equality?
	You know, we were told as they were telling us that I remember the Virginia Slims tour, you know, and Virginia Slims was selling cigarettes.
	You come a long way, baby.
	You're equal to men. You're superior to men, as a matter of fact.
	And we'll show you that you're superior to men because we will have this rigged game with Bobby Riggs.
	And Billie Jean King, and as I've said before, the so-called battle of the sexes that they made so much about, that was sandwiched between two other matches where the women were completely skunked.
	The first one, it was Bobby Riggs who did it.
	Later, Jimmy Connors did it.
	But he threw that one, and they made that big.
	We all have seen now that there's a physical difference between men and women.
	No question about it.
	That's why there's this big outrage about men pretending to be women so they can cash in on the medals.
	Because, you know, hey, if, like we heard about Trump at the Family Research Council and the, you know, prayer day, winning is everything.
	So if winning is everything, go ahead and present yourself as a woman and go compete with him and win all the medals, right?
	Is that right? Well, you remember that essay that I talked about yesterday, which I thought was a very fascinating essay, because it was a woman who, she said she was very ambivalent about abortion.
	She was not a Christian.
	But she did see the positive aspects of Christianity in terms of what it did for women.
	In terms of not holding them up as equal to men, she said, eventually, you know, Christianity played itself out in feminism.
	Well, no, that's not Christianity at all.
	Christianity says that we've got different roles.
	It acknowledges the truth that men are stronger, but it calls men not to use that strength to get whatever they want.
	And that was what she had been talking about in terms of rape, you know, where the strong get to do whatever they wish.
	You know, they can rape people.
	You know, we have the rule of law.
	Instead of electing an emperor like Trump or like Biden, who's going to rule by executive order, we have the rule of law to protect the weak and to protect all of us, to protect all of our individual rights.
	But she said, you know, that men would, you know, just command women, you know, and that was the way the patriarchy was set up.
	No, the Christian ideal, not to command women, but to protect women.
	To understand that even though they may be physically weaker, they are equal in important ways.
	And so, that is completely lost.
	Equality is not good enough.
	You want to be protected.
	And that's why we set up government.
	That's why we have families.
	That's why we have men in the family.
	Otherwise, you're going to go into this he said, she said type of thing.
	And you're going to be, first of all, you know, all this stuff about consent classes and chaperones and enemy coaches and all the rest of the stuff.
	If you throw out the guidelines...
	Of society that were based on Christian principles.
	Then you wind up with a he said, she said type of thing.
	Or you wind up with somebody just using brute force against you like they did in Roman times.
	So, you know, that was...
	And the whole idea, you know, she could not understand the idea of meekness, which is central to Christianity.
	She kept confusing it with weakness.
	No, meekness means...
	That you are gentle, that you are humble, that you are there to serve.
	That the stronger serves the weaker.
	That's what that's about.
	And even though she could see some of the aspects of society and the positive things of Christianity, she missed the fundamental course.
	She was not Christian. But again, Howard Stern.
	I saw this on social media.
	I didn't listen to it. I do not listen to Howard Stern.
	I can't bear the man.
	But this is, I saw this on Twitter.
	Howard Stern spends four minutes absolutely destroying Lauren Boebert.
	Warning, do not play this in front of children.
	And I thought, well, this is kind of interesting.
	Um... You know, he's going to attack her, goes into graphic detail about what he didn't like about what she did at the Beetlejuice production in the audience.
	And I thought, well, this is the ultimate example of a political whore, isn't Howard Stern?
	You know, P.J. Rourke, years ago, he wrote a book talking about politics in Washington, and he called it a Parliament of Whores.
	And when you look at Howard Stern, A man who does stuff that is worse than what Boebert did.
	I'm not excusing anything she did.
	And I'm not getting a relative thing here.
	But he does that kind of stuff on a daily basis.
	That's what he has built his empire around.
	And he spends five minutes ripping her apart for this while he has absolutely nothing to say about this Democrat who is a full-on hooker.
	And running for Congress.
	See, this is the partisanship.
	This is the other side of it.
	Just in the same way that we see this partisanship where the right will excuse Andrew Tate and they'll excuse Russell Brand.
	Well, Howard Stern will excuse this Susanna Gibson who is running in Virginia.
	She's actually running the Virginia House of Delegates.
	So she's actually not even running for Congress.
	It's amazing how much money that was being spent on these candidates.
	Hundreds of thousands of dollars to run for state legislature.
	Truly is amazing. But, you know, she's okay because she pushed gun control.
	Moms demand action.
	We're basically standing behind this porn actress.
	And there's all these pictures in her campaign literature of her and her husband with her kids.
	So what is the lesson for the kids in all of this stuff?
	Moms Demand Action takes on a completely new meaning when it's being done by Susanna Gibson.
	But he has absolutely nothing to say about it.
	And she was given a heads up, by the way.
	Yesterday I said it was Reuters.
	Let me correct that. It was AP, the Associated Press.
	The same people who put up speech rules for journalists.
	Can't say this. Gotta say that.
	Can't say an illegal alien.
	You gotta say an undocumented migrant.
	You can't say somebody who's pro-life.
	They are anti-abortion rights and all the rest of the stuff.
	Well, the AP gave her advance notice so she could take down the worst of it.
	But the stuff that remains is still amazing, and his silence throughout all this stuff is absolutely amazing.
	But he focuses strictly on Lauren Boebert, who did not come anywhere close to the magnitude of what this...
	Nurse was doing.
	He was running for state office.
	And Rumble, obsolete man, 1776.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	He writes, thank you for not bowing to MAGA, which is Hindi witchcraft practiced to this very day by Freemasons.
	Yeah, they have a term for that called MAGA. You know, it's funny when you look at all that stuff.
	Actually, magistrates actually came from it as well.
	The term magi, you know, the gift to the magi.
	It's all people who are involved in astrology and things like that.
	And a lot of magic stuff that's there.
	But, yeah, the problem I've got with...
	With the MAGA movement is its full-on idolatry and the twisting of Christianity that you see being done in these Reawaken America tours with Michael Flynn leading it and the Trump family that's there.
	Let me just respond to a couple of quick emails that were sent here.
	Travis in Idaho, thank you very much for letting me know that he had a problem with Zell.
	We're getting these problems that seem to be We've had the same reports from Cash App, and we have not been able to resolve what is going on with that as well.
	But some people who have been able to donate to me in the past still can.
	But apparently the people who have not done it at this point, they can't find me.
	That's that kind of shadow banning that you see on Twitter as well.
	So he said, not sure why they would do this.
	I called the number. My bank said it might be because I saw unusual activity on the account.
	Yeah, that's the usual excuse.
	I believe it must be because I don't like what you say on the program.
	Anyway, he said, thanks, a check via regular mail is inbound.
	Well, thank you very much, Travis.
	I appreciate that. And I'll just say, you know, if you want to support the program, you can go to thedavidknightshow.com and I'll show you how you can support us.
	But, yeah, that's...
	I guess I'm not enough like Russell Brand to suit YouTube and the BBC and all the social media guys.
	It's amazing. Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day. Let me tell you.
	The David Knight Show.
	You can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidnightshow.com.

▲