Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 8, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:18

The David Knight Show - 09/08/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Transcription by CastingWords
	Using free speech to free minds.
	Music You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday, the 8th of September, year of our Lord, 2023.
	2023.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at the moves in California to not only accelerate the crime that is there, this crime, no punishment, but they're going to start making parenting a crime as well.
	It's absolutely amazing what is happening there.
	And of course, at the same time this is happening, the new hope of the Democrat Party is the California governor grabbing nuisance.
	Yeah, just grab the stuff out of the store and run.
	And then go become a nuisance to parents.
	We're also going to talk about what's going on with Megyn Kelly.
	She's talking about vaccine side effects, and yet she's so excited to interview President Trump, the creator of the vaccine.
	This is the Trump derangement.
	I don't think she's that stupid.
	I think that's what's going on.
	She's going for the audience.
	We'll be right back. Music Well, let's begin with climate.
	Because even though people are talking about the mask stuff, the thing that they're really pushing forward with is the thing that they've been doing for 50 years.
	The lockdowns, masks, vaccines, all the rest of that stuff, that is the other shoe to drop from 9-11.
	It's decades old.
	It's at least 20 years old.
	And, of course, they were planning that type of stuff in advance of them actually executing it.
	But they've been practicing that every year for 20 years.
	First one of them two months before 9-11 and so forth.
	But even longer than that is climate change.
	And at the center of climate change is depopulation.
	The two of them go together, quite frankly.
	Just as 9-11 and the medical security state and the germ games and the lockdowns and all the rest of that stuff goes together.
	It's all part of a comprehensive plan.
	It's one of the reasons why you keep going back to the same things that these different excuses, these different MacGuffins are always directing them to the same action.
	But now we have a lot of information out, and, you know, we've seen it's been a hot summer for sure in places like Arizona, places like Texas.
	A lot of 100-degree days, and yet that doesn't prove anything.
	It really doesn't.
	We have to look at the trend, and we have to also look, is this tied to, is there a corresponding correlation with CO2? And I think one of the best people about this, looking at it, is Steve Malloy.
	Very observant, very careful researcher, and he has several things to say.
	Actually, he had a tweet that went viral, and he got into a back-and-forth with Elon Musk.
	Elon Musk agreed with him as one part of it, but then said, but it's imperative that people have to buy my cars, that type of thing.
	And Steve Malloy had a great comeback.
	But before we look at it, let's take a look, first of all, at the Texas grid.
	Unreliable wind and solar puts Texas grid in danger again, wrote Steve Malloy on Twitter, on X. The Texas power grid operator urged homes and businesses to conserve energy during a brutal heat wave due to high air conditioning demand, low wind power, and declining solar power.
	Well, how can...
	We have declining solar power.
	Well, it only works during the daytime, of course.
	What they have created in Texas with the cynical name ERCOT, Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
	Yeah, there's nothing about what they've been doing for the last decade or so that is reliable.
	When I moved there, they were shutting down reliable power plants and putting in unreliable solar power and wind.
	They didn't have any way to store it.
	They're just now starting to get Elon Musk's giant battery storage sites, which are a massive fire hazard.
	But in Texas, you can put them out in the middle of the desert.
	But they'll put them in cities.
	And of course, it's going to be a major win for him as well.
	The richest man in the world will get much, much richer.
	Texas Power Grid faces another test and urges conservation again.
	Again, on Thursday, second day in a row, in the evening, due to high air conditioning demand, low wind power, declining solar power, they asked homes and businesses to conserve energy.
	They're not going to be asking that much longer.
	In the UK, they're installing smart meters that will ration the electricity.
	You think you're going to have an electric vehicle?
	No. No.
	As a matter of fact, they'll probably require you to plug it in so they can drain what's in the battery out of it.
	ERCOT said Thursday's conservation appeal does not indicate that the grid is experiencing emergency conditions at this time.
	Oh, really? Well, we have some contradictory evidence about that.
	But they noted that current forecasts showed the potential for low reserves this evening when the sun goes down and solar stops working.
	See, they've created what I call a Goldilocks grid.
	Everything's got to be just right.
	It can't be too hot.
	It can't be too cold.
	And the sun has to be shining.
	And the wind has to be blowing.
	We used to have a reliable electric grid.
	They need to take that word out of their acronym.
	It should just be the Electric Council of Texas.
	Or they could change it from reliable to rationing.
	Just keep it as ERCOT. Just change the R. ERCOT, which is taking steps to boost supplies and cut demand.
	Yeah, we've got to give more money to more billionaires for their wind farms.
	Yeah, this is a quixotic quest.
	But we're all going to survive with these windmills.
	We're not jousting with them, they're jesting with us.
	So remember, they said this is not an emergency.
	Well, the interesting thing is, is the Texas Tribune and their headlines said it was an emergency.
	Texas Power Grid enters emergency mode Wednesday evening to avoid rolling blackouts.
	Emergency mode.
	Yes, it is an emergency.
	And what they're doing is they have...
	It was completely unnecessary.
	None of this stuff is necessary.
	They have created chaos for control.
	They have created crisis for control.
	I think you go back to get smart when I was a kid.
	You know, you had control and you had chaos.
	They were the yin and yang, right?
	They were the two opposite sides.
	You had to have one for the other.
	They were telling us something.
	Maybe we should have gotten smart about that.
	But now we get the smart meters and the smart cities and the smart cars and the self-monitoring and reporting technology.
	They should have told us that.
	But again, it was an emergency.
	And they have created this emergency.
	It is a fake emergency.
	And just in case you think that the Texas Tribune got carried away with their headline, here's how much of an emergency it was.
	Texas paid a Bitcoin miner, one Bitcoin miner, more than $31 million to cut energy usage.
	I guess that's an emergency, wouldn't you say?
	You think that's been $31 million if it wasn't an emergency?
	And again, more crony capitalism.
	Ah, yeah. How much money capitalism do you get for putting up a windmill?
	You know, the state of Texas spent billions of dollars after you had these billionaires who, you know, were running these speculative ventures and they started selling the contracts and building and leasing or whatever these, you know, they had all these different, it's as much of a scam as the securitized mortgages.
	That took us under in 2008.
	They created all these different ways to make money.
	Green credits and all the rest of the stuff.
	And then Texas spent billions of dollars creating an infrastructure to pull that power in from these remote locations.
	You talk about subsidies, RFKJ. You really want to talk about subsidies for green stuff?
	Well, it's all over the place.
	So Reuters says the summer of 2023 was the hottest on record.
	But it's just scientists saying that.
	And, you know, it is without any proof, quite frankly.
	As a matter of fact, Steve Malloy says, a reminder, because of this AP report, talking about Phoenix, for example, of her own reporting from this story.
	She said Phoenix, you know, a headline says, Phoenix on track to set another heat record, this time for the most daily highs.
	But inside her report, she said Phoenix has had minus 5 degrees Fahrenheit of urban heat island warming since the 1970s.
	And she says there may be record heat, but not because of the weather, but because of concrete and asphalt and waste heat and where you put the thermometers.
	Look, you can do this experiment on your own.
	Prove it to yourself. You know, Karen and I will talk about, you know, we constantly look at the weather back in Texas.
	Our daughter is still there, and we're, you know, happy to not be there as hot as it is.
	So we look at the weather there.
	We look at the places, the weather where we've lived.
	In Florida, in North Carolina, in Texas, and here, we compare them.
	And she'll say, well, it's going to be such and such there.
	And I said, no, I looked at it earlier today.
	It's supposed to be this. And we'll pull up our apps.
	We have different apps and the different apps for the same city will have thermometers in different places.
	And we will see differences of two, three degrees.
	Do it yourself. Don't take my word for it.
	I put it in several cities and then get a couple of different apps and look at how it varies.
	It varies because of where they're putting the thermometer, of course.
	And we don't have records of thermometers being in that particular place with those particular surroundings for very long, with anything.
	In other words, we don't have any way to say that there is warming or cooling with any of this stuff on a climate basis.
	Do you see the sea levels rising?
	No. Are the polar ice caps gone like Al Gore said they would be several years ago they were supposed to disappear?
	No. But we've got these different temperature measurements.
	And what's going on with that?
	Well, even if you had the same thermometer, which they don't, and the same town, how would, looking at the way the city is, were there more trees than there are now?
	What about the buildings?
	How have they changed?
	Was there more wind to cool things?
	But they've put most of these thermometers now at airports, on the airport tarmac.
	And you know that's going to make everything look hotter.
	And that's what's going on now.
	We used to see a difference as we looked at their thermometer on our car.
	It would typically go down four degrees as we went from Raleigh to the forest in Pittsburgh where we lived.
	Heavy tree cover.
	And that was throughout the year.
	So what are we supposed to assume from that?
	Was there really that much?
	I mean, we're talking about something that's about 20 miles.
	30 miles. Is that much of a difference in temperature?
	4 degrees? That kind of variation?
	It is where they put it, and they don't have a record for most of these places.
	They haven't been taking records.
	Even in places like the UK, they've got maybe more cities that have maybe 150, 200 years of records.
	We don't really even have that in the United States.
	Those records, as the founder of the Weather Channel pointed out, We're based on thermometers that were in a very different location.
	Everything about the location has changed.
	And they were readings that were taken using analog mercury thermometers.
	And now you've got the digital thermometers.
	And these people are foolish enough to think that this is precise.
	So, again, weather is not climate.
	We keep reminding people of that.
	Steve Malloy, as I said, he had some interesting back and forth that caused engagement with Elon Musk.
	This particular tweet, he put a graph up and he said, Noah, that's the weather people for the federal government, he said, for the last eight years, they show global cooling at a rate of 0.11 degrees centigrade per decade.
	Despite 450 plus billion tons of emissions, Worth 14% of total man-made CO2 in the atmosphere.
	CO2 warming is a hoax.
	He talks about the fact that, how is it that they say that it went up X number of degrees with this amount of CO2 that was released, and then when we release 20 times more or 100 times more?
	It doesn't go up in the same way.
	There is no connection between CO2 and temperature increase.
	If there is no connection between CO2 and temperature, then why are we killing cars?
	Why are we cutting the power to our grid so that you can't even run an electric car?
	It's about creating chaos, and it's about having control, and we better get smart.
	The next day, and not unexpectedly, he said no one in the media reported that there had been no warming since 2015.
	And he did get a reply from Elon Musk, which was kind of like, well, I kind of agree with this.
	But then he backed off a little bit.
	He says, it's easier to argue that global warming is a risk Rather than a certainty.
	But it is foolish to roll these dice, given that we will eventually run out of fossil fuels and have to generate energy sustainably anyway.
	That's what Mr. Green Jeans says.
	Jumping to his conclusions.
	Like a kangaroo.
	Anyway, Steve Moise replied and said, Well, he turns climate lukewarmer.
	But imagines that we need to worry about running out of fossil fuel.
	We will run out of metals and rare earths before we run out of fossil fuels.
	That is absolutely true.
	Absolutely true. The proven reserves of all these things, you compare them, there's absolutely no comparison.
	And just as we were talking yesterday with Eric Peters about the fact that Elon Musk, this new charging station he's got in California, he powers it off of a dirty diesel generator.
	You compare that to how clean the diesel engines are from Mercedes and other companies like that that have had to clean them up.
	You compare the power plants that we have in the United States versus what China and India are allowed to create without restriction of number, without any restrictions on emissions whatsoever.
	This is not about global warming.
	It's not about global climate change.
	This is about restructuring our economy, enslaving us and empowering an authoritarian China, which every one of these governments aspire to be.
	We've heard it from George Bush.
	I wish I was like the dictator of China.
	I could just tell people what to do. We've heard it from Trudeau.
	What country do you admire?
	Other than Canada, what's the next country that you admire the most?
	Well, I love China because they can just tell people what to do.
	How many times do we have to see that they all aspire to be authoritarian dictators?
	It's one of the reasons why they all followed the globalist plan that was being modeled for everybody in China in terms of the lockdown and those things.
	Then again, New York Times launches War on Trees.
	New York Times absurdly says that trees have been our friend for this because, you know, trees pull in CO2, as I pointed out before, versus an urban heat island with lots of concrete, lots of buildings and no trees in Raleigh, and it's a small town, versus the area where we lived.
	We had heavily, very dense forest, big trees, a difference of four degrees in temperature.
	And, of course, it's pulling CO2 out of the air.
	And so now, the New York Times says they're now our enemies, and we've got to cut them down and bury them.
	And we've got to take CO2 that plants need to live and trees need to grow, and we've got to pull that out of the atmosphere.
	Well, you know, they store the carbon.
	Well, and then they release it when they die.
	And we've got all these dead trees that are laying in the forest, and they're a fire hazard.
	And it's like, well, there's a solution for that.
	You exercise dominion that God gave us, and you act as stewards of the land instead of worshiping Gaia as if it was some sentient Greek mythology.
	You actually do something about it, and you take these dead trees, you turn them into lumber.
	But it's not really a problem because, as far as the CO2 goes, it's a problem as far as fire goes.
	But it's not a problem as far as CO2 goes.
	These decaying trees emitting CO2. Well, there are living trees who are breathing that in.
	And converting it to oxygen and other things.
	So, the points that Steve Malloy makes...
	Tree forests really only store carbon when they're growing to maturity.
	Mature trees and forests don't grow much, and so they don't store much more carbon.
	Number two, northern hemisphere forests, regardless of any CO2 removal, have a net warming effect because they reduce solar radiation.
	See? It's called shade.
	But it's the New York Times that's throwing shade at you about trees.
	Uh, and then third, he says, if you want to use forests as some kind of, some sort of CO2 sponge, you would need to log and manage them.
	Yeah, there you go.
	Uh, so, uh, he says, here's a policy recommendation.
	Abandon the green policies that turn forests into tinderboxes and abandon climate idiocy.
	I really like Steve.
	I gotta get him back on again.
	Um, He's very good at this.
	And so we're talking about the smart meters and their solution, just like we saw in Texas, right?
	They pay a Bitcoin, one Bitcoin miner, over $30 million to chill it out.
	Don't do anything with that today.
	But in the UK, what they're going to do is they passed a bill to authorize, quote-unquote, reasonable force to install smart meters.
	They know, customers know, in the UK they know what Sadiq Khan is doing with his Khan job, fining people if they move their car, with all the cameras watching to see what they're doing, constantly monitoring and fining them for every activity that Sadiq Khan doesn't like.
	And he tries to justify it by the junk science that's out there.
	And so they know people in the UK are getting pretty angry about this.
	They're cutting down these cameras in one area, just as he was about to roll them out.
	They'd cut down over 90% of the cameras, disable them one way or the other, either cut them down, cut the wires to them, turn them to face the sky, a lot of other things that they were doing.
	And so now they're saying, you know, when you go to somebody's house and you put this smart meter on, they're not going to like it.
	So you can use force to do it.
	That's what it's going to come to.
	And, you know, force people to accept their Green New Deal.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we come back before we get into some of the politics, and before we get into the mask MacGuffin, we are going to talk about some EV fires.
	I've got an update on some of that as well.
	On Rumble, B-Slice, thank you very much.
	That's very generous.
	I appreciate the tip. High Night Family listening on Rockfin, donating on Rumble, because there's less hoops for the money.
	Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	Side note, once you look into it, our entire healthcare system is financially incentivized medical malpractice.
	That's right. You're absolutely right.
	It wasn't something that just began.
	They just took it to a new level.
	That's the key thing, you know.
	And we have been looking at the medical profession, and of course the pharmaceutical companies are driving it.
	The pharmaceutical companies are pure greed criminals, and And yet, you know, it got to all new levels of openness.
	It's kind of like the censorship as well.
	We've known the censorship has been there, but now they're doing it out in the open, writing letters about it.
	Yeah, we're the government and we're here to censor you.
	Who cares about the Constitution?
	We're not even going to pretend that we're not doing it.
	We don't have to pretend that it's not us doing it.
	It's YouTube and these other people.
	No, now we know that it's them.
	And they come out and they create new structures and new organizations to ramp it up.
	And the same thing is happening now.
	In medicine.
	It truly is financially incentivized medical malpractice.
	By the way, we're going to talk also about abortion coming up in the show.
	And there has been a change in Mexico with abortion.
	And I want to talk about that in terms of the bigger picture.
	Tie it into euthanasia and tie it into what is the difference between morality and ethics?
	I came across...
	Well, I'll talk about it when we get to it.
	I came across some stuff that I thought was very interesting insights from John Lennox and some other people who are...
	John Lennox, if you don't know who he is, check him out.
	He's getting kind of old, but he's still sharp as a tack.
	And he's a Christian, he's a mathematician, and he is a great apologist.
	And so he had some interesting things to say.
	Brian Shulhavi had some interesting things to say about the difference between technology and wisdom as well.
	So we're going to get into that coming up.
	We will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about cars.
	We've got a massive airbag recall.
	And I talked about this before.
	It's a company called ARC. And they had contested this recall that was starting to come into shape.
	It was an eight-year investigation by NHTSA, and they said the recall is justified because two people have been killed in the U.S. and Canada by ARC inflators, including a Michigan woman in 2021.
	The airbag inflators have caused seven injuries.
	And so they're going to recall 52 million of these.
	What about the vaccine? Isn't it amazing?
	Isn't it amazing how they will strain at a gnat and swallow a camel?
	It's just crazy.
	And, you know, and I would even include in this, and I've talked many times, contrasted what they don't do with the vaccines with what they did do with the Boeing 737 MAX. And, you know, two crashes.
	Of 8,200 flights.
	And of course, when it crashes, everybody dies.
	So you had 250 approximately people die in each of those crashes.
	So 500 people die. But still, that's only 2 out of 8,200.
	If Fauci was running the organization and getting money from Boeing, like he gets money from the pharmaceutical companies, I'm sure he would just say, it's rare.
	It's rare. Don't worry about it.
	Forget about it. Not a problem.
	But it truly is amazing.
	I think they did the right thing to shut down the Boeing 737 MAX. I'm just saying the different standards based on who it is and what the industry is.
	Clearly, you can see the corruption is the point.
	And you can see that with this as well.
	So we've got two people who have been killed from the airbags and seven injuries.
	ARC says it's not their airbags, it's something else.
	But nevertheless, the airbag system in question, 2000 to 2018 models of cars manufactured by BMW, Ford, GM, Hyundai.
	Kia, Maserati, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, Stellantis, Tesla, Toyota, Volkswagen.
	And of course, Stellantis, that'd be Chrysler, Dodge.
	And while we're talking about automotive stuff, are there any recalls on the Tesla self-driving thing?
	Because we've had a lot more people killed with the Tesla self-driving than we have had over a 20-year period of Now, these airbags that they're recalling, I mean, this is a massive thing.
	It probably put the company out of business.
	52 million airbags.
	I think Takata airbags, which had about 15 people killed, I think they had to declare bankruptcy or something like that.
	But still, you're going to just pass on all the people that have been killed by the Tesla self-driving thing?
	As I've said many times, Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computer, he said, I love my Tesla, but don't use a self-driving thing.
	That is trying to kill you.
	Well, why doesn't the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, why don't they even say you can't turn that thing on?
	Why don't they mandate that Tesla do a recall and disable that feature?
	No, they don't even do that.
	Truly is amazing. You know why they don't do that?
	As a matter of fact, you look at this stuff back and forth, and because Elon Musk says, well, I'm going to allow free speech, well, the authoritarian leftists hate that.
	Just to say that, even if it's not true, and it isn't.
	He censored RFKJ. I'm still shadow banned there.
	But, you know, it's just the idea that there would be such a thing as free speech just inflames the left.
	And they absolutely despise him now for just saying that.
	And when he got into the fight this week with the Defamation League, and that is what they are.
	They're a defamation league.
	And they organize advertiser boycotts, and they've been proud of it, and they bragged about it when they did it with Fox News and Tucker Carlson and so forth.
	It's not a question. It's what they do.
	And he's come out and said, by the way, they hit me up for a donation.
	I didn't give it to them, and that's when all this stuff started.
	Regardless of that, because he took on the Defamation League, Which has been, along with the Southern Poverty Law Center, they create an enemies list of the government and their enemies list, and they use that to censor people.
	And so because he said that, you've got these angry op-ed pieces out there.
	Okay, that's it. The government needs to stop doing business with Elon Musk.
	Well, that isn't going to happen.
	As a matter of fact, he put out, he said, look, 80% of the payloads that have been launched, I think it's by weight, perhaps, I don't know, but he said 80% of the payloads that have been launched, and I don't recall what the time period was, maybe the last year, into space, have been done by SpaceX.
	10% by China, and 10% by everybody else.
	He's got 80% of the launching market for satellites and things like that.
	The government's not going to shut him down.
	They can't do this stuff.
	They need to have him running SpaceX.
	So that's not going to happen.
	It's one of the reasons why he gets a pass on the self-driving stuff and other things like that as well.
	So, anyway...
	ARC, the company that made the products, they denied that their products are defective.
	I covered this once before. As a matter of fact, I think the company's here in Tennessee somewhere.
	They said any problems with its airbags resulted from random one-off manufacturing anomalies that were properly addressed with individual recalls.
	You see, when we look at the Boeing 737 MAX and you've got 8,200 flights and two of them crash, You've got a situation here where you have 52 million airbags, and the government is saying that nine of them have been defective over the last 20 years.
	Over the last 20 years.
	How much use? How many miles has this been?
	I would tend to agree with a company on this, Ark Automotive and Delphi Automotive, that they're being unfairly prosecuted about this.
	Because if you've got 52 million airbags that have been used for, let's say, an average of 10 years each, because this is a 20-year period, and you've only had, let's see, two people killed, seven injuries.
	You've had nine of them. That's way better than the vaccine, isn't it?
	That's way better than the vaccine the first week it was put out.
	And then the fires.
	You know, we were talking yesterday about...
	Lala Harris and her love affair with school buses, especially electric school buses.
	Karen saw this picture of a school bus back in the 1920s, I think.
	1930, 1930.
	A school bus complete with snow skis and a wood stove in northern Maine.
	It was cold, so what they did was they built this little tiny wood house.
	And they've got it on skids, so it can be pulled through the snow.
	And it's got a two-horsepower engine there, which is two horses that are hitched up to this thing.
	And you see this little woodshed with a wood stove in it.
	And the first thing I think about is as they're pulling this thing over Hill and Dale, you've got little kids in there with a wood stove inside a wood box.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	But then I thought about it a second.
	I said, you know, that's probably much less of a fire hazard than one of these electric buses.
	Nobody ever died in that in 1930.
	And then you take a look. They keep scaling it up, right?
	You have a record number of fires in New York and deaths because of these electric fires.
	Scooters, and they scale it up to, you know, started, we had phones years ago that would spontaneously combust because there was something defective in a lithium battery.
	So let's make it bigger. Let's make it a scooter.
	Then let's make it a car.
	Then let's make it a bus.
	Then let's make it a semi.
	An electric vehicle semi company called Nikola has now had its third battery electric truck catch fire at the factory.
	They're not even really selling these things yet.
	And get them while they're hot.
	These things are so hot, they're igniting right there at the factory.
	The company says the recalled trucks are still safe to drive.
	Just use some precautions, so maybe they have sold some of these things.
	A third Nikola battery electric truck caught fire in Arizona.
	Isn't that amazing? I mean, you know, Nikolai Tesla must be spinning in his grave.
	Everybody steals his name.
	Ha! Elon Musk take his last name.
	These two people take his first name.
	You can't catch a break here.
	They're a part that said, okay, so you can use these things, but, you know, just like the people in Florida who had electric cars and their batteries got exposed to some salt water, park them outside, away from any buildings, because, you know, they're liable to spontaneously combust here at any moment.
	So, you know, they're still fine.
	Just park them outside, away from structures, leave the main battery disconnect switch in the on position until the truck is repaired.
	So, they had a battery pack fire at their facility in June.
	Then they had another one in August.
	And now they've had a third one in September.
	That's three out of four months they've had a fire there.
	Except, if you continue to read, the one that caught fire June the 23rd spread and damaged four other trucks parked outside at their headquarters in Phoenix.
	And then the first truck reignited again in July.
	So they're not counting that as a fourth fire because that truck caught fire twice.
	Two-time loser.
	But if you look at that, that's four out of four months these people have had a fire.
	There's absolutely no reason for us to shut down the things that work Diesel semis, functional fuel power generators, even in Germany, shutting down nuclear power, which has no emissions, just shut everything down.
	And let's run to these new untested technologies, unperfected technologies, just like we had to run to an untested vaccine.
	Except that they know what it's going to do to us.
	It isn't that they're just stupid and in a rush because they're trying to solve a problem.
	They know that the problem is fake.
	And they know that the solution is A, not going to be effective, and B, is going to destroy us and society.
	Here's another example.
	Electric car bricks up in the middle of a busy road and becomes a nine-hour headache.
	This is near Salisbury, England.
	Maybe they can grab these things and make a new Stonehenge.
	You know, you've got that place, the Cadillac Ranch, off of Route 66 where they take the cars and they bury them a third of the way in the ground.
	Well, you know, maybe you could do that, except you've got to make sure that you've got that battery pack buried, and it's a problem because if any part of the car is sticking up, the battery pack is usually under the whole thing.
	But anyway, I guess we need to have a new Stonehenge or a new Cadillac Ranch for these things.
	But this one became a brick.
	The nightmarish gridlock began when a Tesla Model 3 performance car ran out of power and broke down as it was making a turn off a high-traffic thoroughfare Tuesday afternoon.
	A team of workers was unable to move the stranded EV because the handbrakes of electric cars and some other modern cars are controlled electronically, unlike those of traditional petrol and diesel cars, which are mechanical. This means that the handbrake often locks when the power fails and the car cannot be pushed or towed.
	Now, I did some work for...
	The people who monitor the traffic in Raleigh, they've got cameras everywhere so they can see what is happening.
	To their credit, they send out crews when they see that there's something happening and somebody's broken down.
	They have roving crews and they send them to help the person get the car off the road or get it started or whatever like that.
	I saw a truck that was broken down.
	And causing a big backup on the interstate.
	And it was, of course, you know, I had never really thought about not having ever driven trucks.
	The air brakes, the default is that they are on when there is no power.
	The brakes, by default, go on.
	And so when the engine is running, you can release the brakes.
	And so when this thing broke down, the engine wasn't running.
	It wasn't that you had this massively heavy thing, which you'd weigh up to 80,000 pounds, that you had to tow out of the way.
	It also had the brakes fully locked on.
	That thing wasn't going anywhere.
	I didn't know that the electric cars, I hadn't thought about the electric cars doing the same thing.
	But that's basically what happened with this.
	It's like, you know, you've got to get that engine running before you can get this thing out of the way.
	And then we have the Cybertruck from Elon Musk.
	He said, look at this, it's got bulletproof.
	You talk about not testing something.
	If you're going to have a big demo and you're going to put this out there and you're going to throw metal balls at the windows, wouldn't you think it'd be a good idea to try that first?
	This is just a hubris.
	And we see this over and over again.
	When he launched that biggest rocket that he had recently, and it just blew out his entire launch pad and launched concrete missiles at everybody over several mile radius and over an area that was supposed to be like a wildlife preserve or something like that.
	It was a massive disaster, but they were happy because it got off the ground and went a ways before they had to destroy it.
	So he runs into this stuff without really doing any testing of it.
	That's kind of where we are with technology today, isn't it?
	This whole thing about beta tests?
	No, we're not going to do a beta test.
	We're not even going to do an alpha test.
	Forget about it. We're just going to roll this stuff out.
	And so, you know, he had the demo where he...
	Where he threw the metal thing, a ball against the windows, and they smashed, and he had somebody else come, oh no, you've thrown it too hard, and they did.
	It smashed the second time.
	Well, people are still laughing about something else.
	The people who are designers, car designers, Claims that the Cybertruck has a serious problem that can only be fixed with a complete revamping of the vehicle, as its issues are deeply rooted in its design.
	Not only does it look like, as they say, a low-polygon video game joke, right?
	Again, people's aesthetics, if you like it, fine.
	It's not something that...
	Fast Company was told by Adrian Clark, a professional car designer, he said the Cybertruck is a low-polygon joke that only exists in the fever dreams of Tesla fans that stand high on the smell of Elon Musk's flatulences.
	As soon as we saw the Cybertruck, everyone I know in the industry started laughing.
	We just thought there is no way they're going to be able to get that into production.
	Why? Why? Well, he said if you have a dead flat panel, in other words, something completely flat, no curvature to it at all, as the Cybertruck does, it will cause problems in production.
	They always have an amount of curves in them because they have to be able to hold the shape when the part comes out of the press.
	And then in addition to that, he said, it's going to vibrate and they're going to have massive problems stamping those panels and having them keep their shape.
	And he pointed out that when it's completely flat like that, any imperfection is going to show up as well.
	So by making them completely dead flat, he said they're going to vibrate, it's going to be difficult to manufacture, and it's going to show the flaws to a big degree.
	He said his observation reportedly aligns with Musk's own admission about the dimensional variations being prominently visible due to the truck's straight edges.
	This design flaw also causes the doors to not always align properly with the body, which is a fundamental issue that speaks to the vehicle's overall build quality said fast company.
	It remains unclear if the changes in the frame and the fake exoskeleton We're caused by other potential manufacturing problems.
	Clark told Fast Company that all those dead flat panels are, quote, going to vibrate, and they're going to have massive problems stamping the panels to keep their shape.
	This will force Tesla to use some kind of foam or sound deadening.
	Flaws within the Cybertruck are not isolated incidents, but rather, he said, they are emblematic of a broader concerning trend that has been emerging over the years.
	The report from Fast Company says that Tesla forums are filled with discussions and complaints about problems including misaligned body panels, body paint problems, and a slew of hardware malfunctions that range from door handles to problems with retractable windows and poor quality dashboard screens.
	You see, there's...
	And this is the problem.
	As they are destroying the car companies, you know, anybody can put together pretty much these, it doesn't require a lot of manufacturing expertise, a lot of experience, obviously, to put together an electric car like it does the cars that we've had in the past.
	And you're going to have that knowledge base of that kind of technology is going to be lost.
	They never had it at Tesla.
	We'll be right back. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Let's talk a little bit about abortion.
	In Mexico, the Supreme Court has now decriminalized abortion nationwide.
	They did that on Wednesday, making it one of many Latin American countries that have eased restrictions in recent years.
	They had previously had abortion decriminalized in one state Some of the states had moved to liberalize their laws around abortion after that, but the federal law still said that those laws were unconstitutional, and they also had laws that penalized medical providers who performed that procedure, and they were still there until their Supreme Court swept all that stuff away.
	Again, you know, we have to get over this idea that You can have judicial supremacy.
	The founders of this country said, you know, we got checks and balances, and the one that seems to be the least dangerous is the judicial branch because they don't have any way to enforce this.
	You know, the executive branch has powers.
	The legislative branch has money.
	What does the judiciary do?
	Well, what the judiciary does, their special superpower, is that they allow those other branches, To skip any accountability.
	It's not up to me. It's up to the court.
	I don't have to be the final decision.
	I don't want to take this issue on, right or wrong.
	They will do it. And we're seeing that to some extent now with the mask stuff as well, as we're going to get into that in a moment.
	But as soon as you had Marbury v.
	Madison, Jefferson said, well, that's it.
	The Constitution's dead. And it took a while for that to come to fruition, but we've now seen that, that if you have one branch of government, it doesn't matter which one it is.
	And again, you can talk about whether it's judicial supremacy or whether it's bureaucratic supremacy, because all the bureaucracy is under the executive branch, and they just kick the stuff over there.
	Let them, you've got to pass it so we can find out what's in it, said Nancy Pelosi.
	They put in the devil of the details.
	And if they get it wrong, then you'll have somebody like J.D. Vance come back and carve back a little bit of it temporarily, just a very narrow part of it.
	Now aren't you proud of me? Look at what I did.
	I prohibited some mask stuff out there.
	Not much of it, but, you know, that allows them to not take the heat.
	It's very subtle the way these powers are gained or abdicated, and we need to understand how that's being done, because if we don't understand it, we are going to continually be victimized by it.
	That's one of the things from the very beginning of this, all these people say, well, it's not Trump who's doing it, it's the governors.
	And it's not the Republican governors, it's the Democrat governors.
	Well, that was absolutely a lie.
	It was Republican governors who were doing it just as much as Democrat governors were doing it.
	But they were all being funded.
	They were all being bribed by the federal government.
	And that's the way they operate.
	They don't have the power to directly order it under the 10th Amendment.
	That would be too risky.
	And, you know, they will eventually start doing that.
	But it's typically done...
	By government regulation, like you see with the ATF, or it's done most frequently with monetary prices.
	We're going to give you some money if you do this, or we're going to take money away from you if you don't do what I tell you to do.
	And so we have to be wise about how they're actually operating, because otherwise any of these laws that they pass are not really going to be effective.
	Some states in Mexico had moved to liberalize their laws until Wednesday, and now abortion after the Supreme Court there in Mexico said so.
	Abortion will become available in all federal Mexican health institutions in every state where women could have previously faced criminal penalties for undergoing the procedure.
	Let me just say when we look at this, the same type of thing happened in Ireland.
	Ireland and Mexico, a lot of places where abortion was never legal, it's now become legal.
	We think that we've had some victories with the Dobbs decision.
	All that did was to acknowledge that this is a state decision, which it always was and should be under our form of government.
	And yet, you see that even in Republican states, there's a big movement to remove restrictions in Republican states.
	We're losing this fight, quite frankly, folks.
	Let's not fool ourselves.
	Dobbs was a victory for the Tenth Amendment, but it really wasn't a victory for life, because that fight has to be fought on a state-by-state basis, and we're losing that fight state-by-state, and we're losing it in places like Mexico and Ireland and other places like that as well, because it is a moral fight that we're involved in.
	You know, it's morality, it's ethics, it's things like that.
	Well, one person said, abortion is not a crime.
	Is it? I think it is.
	You know, when we look at comfort care, for example, you know, the baby survives the abortion, what do we do?
	Well, we kill it anyway.
	We kill it without direct action.
	Because if you use direct action as Kermit Gosnell did for two babies, he got murder charges on that.
	In that trial, they didn't have any jurors that didn't support abortion.
	They were appalled to find out They had an abortionist who came in and talked to these jurors who had all said, you know, I think abortion is fine.
	And so she explained to them the difference between comfort care and what Kermit Gosnell did, where he actively killed the baby, rather than setting it over on the side and letting it die in misery.
	That's supposed to be comfort care.
	That's what Ralph Northam said.
	The medical doctor who became governor in Virginia, when he talked about that, people were amazed.
	And the jurors who all supported abortion, they were amazed at the idea of comfort care.
	But here it is.
	Let's talk about what it looks like when you do it to an adult.
	In Belgium, you had a terminally ill woman euthanized with a pillow.
	With a pillow. The Scalia technique.
	This doctor had tried to use lethal drugs, and they were not working.
	So then he grabs a pillow and he smothers her to death.
	You see how this is essentially the same thing as the comfort care issue?
	I mean, they had said it was okay for the doctor to kill her, but he has to do it a certain way.
	Is that what it's come to in our society?
	Murder is okay as long as you do it a certain way.
	The doctor allegedly used a pillow to suffocate the woman to end her life.
	A post-mortem showed signs of suffocation.
	Another Belgian politician and doctor said, what happened here is not euthanasia.
	The definition of this terrible situation devalues the gesture of euthanasia.
	Which accompanies a person to the end without pain.
	It's just semantics.
	You know, it's murder.
	You can call it abortion, or you can call it euthanasia, or you can call it comfort care.
	We're talking about semantics here.
	A lawyer representing the family said the bereaved are not demanding, quote, heavy sanctions, unquote.
	But he said, if rules exist, it is so that sick rooms do not turn into crime scenes where anything can be done.
	Well, that's what we're doing, isn't it?
	And so... Yesterday, as I was looking through the news, I just came across several different things that were about ethics and morality, technology and wisdom.
	I heard a presentation about ethics and morality from John Lennox, and it really made me stop and think about some of these things.
	As a matter of fact, first of all, the difference between ethics and morality.
	And this is an article from a few years ago by R.C. Sproul who's now passed away.
	He said the English word ethic or ethics comes from the Greek word ethos.
	The words morals and morality come from the word mores.
	He said the difference is that the ethos of a society or culture deals with its foundational philosophy, with its concepts of values.
	And he says there is a philosophical value system that is the etho of every culture in the world.
	On the other hand, mores has something to do with the customs and the habits, the normal forms of behavior that are found in a given culture.
	He said ethics is concerned with what ought to be.
	Morality is concerned with what is.
	Isness or oughtness, he says.
	It's kind of a joke. Ethics is normative.
	It's imperative. It deals with what someone ought to do.
	But morality describes what someone is actually doing.
	He said the two concepts are intermixed, confused, merged, blended into our contemporary understanding.
	He said what has come out of this confusion of ethics and morality is the emergence of what I call statistical morality.
	To find out what is normal, we do a statistical survey.
	We take a poll or we find out what people are actually doing.
	For example, suppose we find that out of a majority of teenagers using marijuana, we come to the conclusion that at this point in history then, it is normal for the adolescent in American culture to indulge in the use of marijuana.
	If it is normal, we deem it to be good and right.
	That's the new morality.
	And now we see that with LGBT, for example.
	If enough people are doing it, well, that's the new normal.
	Because we don't have an absolute standard.
	Ultimately, the science of ethics is concerned with what is right.
	Morality is concerned with what is accepted.
	In most societies, when something is accepted, it is judged to be right.
	And this produces a crisis...
	For the Christian. When what is determines what ought to be, we might as Christians find ourselves swimming against the cultural current, and we do.
	The Christian concept of ethics is on a collision course with much of what is being expressed as morality.
	We do not determine right or wrong based on what everybody else is doing.
	For example, if we study the statistics, we see that all men at one time are another lie.
	That doesn't mean that all men lie all the time.
	And if we look at this statistically, though, we would say that 100% of people indulge in dishonesty.
	And since it's 100%, well, then we should come to the conclusion that it is perfectly normal for human beings to tell lies.
	But even beyond that, he says the Bible says we lean toward lying, yet we're called to a higher standard.
	As Christians, the character of God supplies our ultimate ethos, or our ethic.
	The ultimate framework by which we discern what's right, good, and pleasing to Him.
	And of course, that's the key.
	Are we going to have an ethical standard?
	How do we determine what is right and wrong?
	We see these people who are ethics professors all the time saying, well, no, I think you can kill a kid up to the age of two or three.
	They really haven't matured to the point where I think that they're human.
	So I think it'd be ethical to do it.
	And we keep using these terms interchangeably.
	The real key is not that we distinguish between ethics and morality and the semantics and the backgrounds of that.
	But the real issue is that we look at this and we say, does society have a foundational standard?
	From a legal standpoint, That would be the Constitution.
	From a legal standpoint, that would be the idea that we have a living Constitution that the left is always putting out there.
	The living Constitution would be reflected in what society now accepts, and we don't care about what was written, even though everybody took an oath to do that.
	You have to have an objective standard.
	And so for the Christian, the real question is, is there a God, and has He spoken?
	And for the people in politics, is that, are we going to have a rule of law, or are we going to have a mob?
	Doing whatever the mob wants to do.
	So, on Rockfan, Gregory, thank you very much for the tip.
	And that's very kind.
	I appreciate what you have to say.
	So, thank you for that.
	But let's talk a little bit about what Brian Shalhavi had to say.
	Because he was looking at this from a different perspective.
	He says, we replaced wisdom with technology.
	You know, as I saw that, I also saw a...
	It was an interview with John Lennox, as I said before, an Irish mathematician, but he's also a Christian who engages atheists in debates.
	And he was interviewed by John Anderson.
	And he said some very interesting things with some interesting quotes from scientists and from, you know, one guy, Lord Sachs, who was a UK rabbi.
	And he had an interesting thing to say about science.
	He said, science, Lord Sachs, said science takes things apart to see how they work.
	Religion puts them together to see what they mean.
	I thought that was very interesting.
	You know, science cannot give us meaning.
	He also quoted Einstein, and he says, Einstein said, you can speak of the ethical foundations of science, but you can't speak of the scientific foundations of ethics.
	They're very different things.
	And so when Brian Shalhavi looks at it, it contrasts wisdom with technology.
	And again, you know, science, an example that John Lennox said, he said, you can figure out with science and technology how to poison your aunt in order to get her inheritance, but science isn't going to tell you whether or not it's right to do that.
	You're going to have to have some kind of an ethical foundation.
	And I think, again, we get back to when we talk about wisdom, even.
	Wisdom versus technology.
	Whose wisdom is it going to be?
	Is it going to be our wisdom or is it going to be God's wisdom?
	John Lennox says that science can't give us the answers to the key questions.
	Who am I? What is the meaning of life?
	And where do we get our moral compass?
	And at that point, we get ejected into the pit of doom from Monty Vyvan.
	Now, seriously, you know, those are good questions.
	Those are very important questions. But I think, ultimately, it's simpler than that.
	It comes down to just two questions.
	Is there a God? And has He spoken?
	Because if there is a God and He has spoken, you better listen to what He has to say.
	And He hasn't done any amendments to it.
	So... Again, when we look at this, Brian Shalhavi's point was to say we've been caught up so much in technology and the how of things.
	We don't look at the why of things and that sort of thing.
	But he says it's also another aspect of this as well.
	Even what we talk about in terms of technology has changed quite a bit.
	Technology is much broader than what we think of as technology today.
	We look at the areas that have advanced quite a bit, computers, electronic devices, and things like that.
	All these things, as Brian Shahavi points out, that are dependent upon electricity.
	And if you pull the plug on that, which these people are working very hard to pull the plug on it, as I mentioned before, in the name of preserving the climate and so forth, they're working very hard to destroy the infrastructure that supplies us electricity.
	And they will do it if we don't stop them, if we don't demand that they stop.
	And if we don't point out that there aren't any lions on the Scottish Highlands, and we don't need a trap for lions, it's a trap for us.
	So if we go down that point, and if they either do it by slow destruction, or if we have something like an EMP, he says we forget that there's a lot of other technology that's always been around.
	Technology in the general sense is just how do you do this and how do you do that?
	People have come up with techniques that To do all sorts of things.
	You know, the Amish have a lot of technology that has been handed down from one person to the other.
	It's not based on computers and electricity, but they've got a lot of technology.
	They've got a lot of know-how.
	And we're forgetting all the know-how as we are now becoming completely dependent on electrical devices.
	He says, I'm not stating that all technology will go away or fail.
	What is inevitable is that we will recognize limitations of this technology, including the ways that it can be used to enslave us.
	And we'll be forced to use our God-given creativity and ingenuity to make smart uses of the technology without depending on it as much as we do now.
	So we have to be careful that the technology does not become our master, that it does not make us passive, that it does not dumb us down, that it doesn't make us, to use the metaphor that H.G. Wells had in his time machine, it doesn't turn us into Eloy.
	But there were very few people today who were even thinking about that, let alone preparing for it.
	They'll be the ones who suffer the most.
	So to prepare for the future post-technological age, We need to acknowledge the difference between knowledge and wisdom.
	He says our Western educational system needs to be completely overhauled because it's been built on the false foundation of Darwinian evolutionary biology.
	We have exalted the physical sciences over other traditional forms of education.
	He said the English word science has been thoroughly corrupted.
	Today it is used as a replacement for truth.
	It's become a religion, scientism, of course.
	And science is the new religion.
	It is based on authority.
	And as I've said over and over again, you know, Francis Bacon, when he came up with the scientific method, he said where he contrasted his scientific method with academia.
	He said, we're not going to go to authorities and we're not going to go to authoritative schools, brand name schools to get our answers.
	We're going to get our answers by experimentation and observation and data and that type of thing.
	You have to be able to reproduce this if it's going to be real.
	I thought it was very interesting.
	I talked about it within the last couple of weeks.
	I don't remember the exact date I talked about it.
	But there was a paper that somebody put out about these controversial issues.
	And they said, we don't even want to go through peer review.
	Peer review is a joke.
	Peer review is something that's done by academia.
	It's done by people who are afraid to speak the truth.
	He says, here's my research.
	I'm putting it out there. You try to reproduce it.
	That's real science. If you can reproduce it, it works.
	If you can't reproduce it, then it doesn't work.
	You verify it. Forget the peer review.
	We don't need that. Technology, says Brian, is defined today as almost exclusively electronic technology.
	Very recent development in human history.
	The lifeblood of electronic technology, AI, all the rest of this stuff is electricity.
	If that stops, it's all gone.
	How many people in today's society know how to survive in this world for extended periods of time with no electricity?
	As humans have done for thousands of years before we developed electricity.
	Having not only our society but our very lives be dependent upon this electronic technology is not only not wise, it is pure insanity.
	All the knowledge and data in the world will be of no use once this electricity stops and you have to find water and food without it.
	By the way, let me just say, Jack Lawson knows that.
	That's why he put this stuff in a book.
	He doesn't sell it in any electronic format.
	Here's what you need to know to find your food and your water and to survive and defend yourself.
	And you're going to have it in a book so that when the thing that is making us all vulnerable, electricity, finally goes away, you'll still be able to do this.
	When the internet goes away, you'll still be able to do this.
	That's very key. Again, go to CivilDefenseManual.com.
	He's got a chapter there for free that you can read about water.
	He's got another one about nuclear war.
	And he's got a lot of people there who have an excellent resource.
	As I've said before, one person who got it said, it's worth 25 times what I paid for it.
	So, anyway, that's got a lot of...
	Techniques, a lot of technology to survive.
	And it isn't about an app or a computer program or the internet or any of that stuff.
	It's about surviving when that stuff goes away, even.
	So he says, what we have now is a technological society with very little wisdom.
	So where do we get wisdom?
	I got to Proverbs.
	Get wisdom, my son, right?
	Well, where does it come from? Is it going to be man's wisdom?
	Is it going to be God's wisdom? Again, it comes back to, is there a God?
	Has he spoken? I'm convinced he has.
	I bet everything on that.
	Everything in my life, I bet on that.
	To describe the difference between wisdom and knowledge, I like to use the illustration of the modern automobile, he said.
	There isn't a single person reading this article today that learned how to drive...
	By using the scientific method to obtain knowledge.
	You didn't learn how to drive by reading books on auto mechanics or on internal combustion engines or on electric battery operated lithium batteries.
	That doesn't teach you how to drive an automobile.
	You could develop some hypotheses and theories about how to go about driving one and then use trial and error to see if they work to test your hypothesis and theories.
	But that would not be wise. You'd probably crash.
	Instead, you learn how to drive a motor vehicle by looking for somebody who already knows how to drive one.
	Someone with more wisdom and experience than you.
	And then you ask that person to teach you.
	The general principle here would be that the more experience one has in successfully driving a motor vehicle, the better able they are to pass that experience on to somebody else.
	How much they know about vehicles.
	Such as words printed in a book is pretty much irrelevant in actually using a motor vehicle.
	Yeah, that's it.
	That's the difference between education and training, isn't it?
	You know, education is knowing about something in a sense.
	Training is you're learning about it and you're learning by doing it.
	And when we talk about the big questions of life, is there a God and has He spoken?
	There's a lot of advice, a lot of education that is there for certain.
	But also, there has to be a submission to being trained.
	God doesn't just give us a bunch of head knowledge, but we go through life and the bad things that happen to us in this life and the good things that happen to us in this life, they're all about training.
	We have to learn how to deal with the pitfalls of good things, just like we have to learn what to do when we fall and things are bad.
	He said you could read a book about how to start a fire using a flintstone instead of a Bic lighter, for example, but until you actually attempt to do it and learn how to build a fire that way by experience, you'll not know how to do it using flint.
	And so that's the key thing.
	Brian Shalhavi, Vaccine Impact Hour, healthimpact.com.
	He finishes up by saying, seek wisdom from the wisest person in the universe.
	That's right, God. God has spoken.
	Why wouldn't you look for his wisdom?
	Why wouldn't you look for what he expects of us and why he has put us here and what life means?
	He's very clear about it.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Crime and punishment, right?
	Not the big book, but if you look at California, or a lot of liberal states are now doing this, you have crime and no punishment.
	No punishment.
	Giant Foods, as I pointed out last week, they're now circling the wagons because in Washington, D.C., there is so much shoplifting.
	They don't know what to do. I mean, locking stuff up, that's not working.
	So they're going to try to get rid of national brands.
	Maybe if, you know, this isn't something that has a certain panache, maybe if it's just private label brands, then maybe they'll leave it alone.
	Boy, that is really desperate, isn't it?
	Isn't it a shame that it has come to that in America?
	And yet, when we look at California, where this stuff was really rolled out with these Soros prosecutors, and with the legislature, and one of the guys who was the sponsor of that bill said, we made a really big mistake with this.
	And yet, instead of fixing that mistake, instead of going back and saying, well, we're not going to treat crime under $1,000, theft under $1,000, we're not going to just let that go.
	We're not going to treat it as a misdemeanor and just let the people go.
	No, instead, they are still running in the wrong direction.
	They're not fixing that.
	They've got a bill that's about to pass that will essentially prohibit workers from doing anything to stop this theft.
	They're not saying that they're going to have threat of punishment from police.
	They removed the threat of punishment for theft, and so now these people are doing it rampantly.
	So what they have is a bill that would legally mandate employers to implement a workplace violence prevention plan because they're not going to do anything to stop the crime.
	And it's already passed in the Senate, and it is coming up for a third reading in the State Assembly before heading for a full vote.
	If they pass it, it's likely to be signed by Graben Nuisance.
	Yeah, Governor Graben is going to...
	He thinks he's going to run for president if Biden doesn't make it.
	Does he realize that people are going to show what has been happening in California?
	Just call him Governor Grabbin because he's allowed everybody to just go in and grab whatever they want and run for the exits without any punishment, any threat of it.
	And then don't you dare try to stop them.
	You know, if you stop them, they're going to come after your employer.
	So your employer is going to say, as we've already seen with, what was it?
	Was it Home Depot or Lowe's?
	You had some woman try to stop a guy who was stealing.
	And they fired her.
	They fired her. I said, well, just get your severance pay by going back and making multiple trips and just taking whatever you want and reselling it, I guess.
	That's the system we're going to have.
	The measure seeks to compel employers whose workers face a credible threat of violence.
	Because why? Because they're in California in a retail store.
	To provide effective violence prevention training and maintain a violence incident log, employers' violence prevention plans will have to ensure, quote, employees comply with safe and healthy work practices, which may include disciplinary action.
	So, if people come in to steal stuff and you try to stop them, you'll be fired or worse.
	So, just let it go.
	Well... It has killed Beverly Hills.
	You've got one guy who has been taking pictures of what Beverly Hills looks like now.
	Because, you know, they loaded up the truck and they looted Beverly Hills, that is.
	But this person, nostalgic Angeleno, shows off more than a dozen Beverly Hills retailers and restaurants that are completely shuttered, not replaced by new businesses, leaving their empty storefronts as shelves.
	Luxury staples like Barney's New York or once popular brands have filed for bankruptcy in recent years.
	It's got pictures of Chanel all boarded up.
	This is the direct result of the policies in California.
	And again, does it make it right?
	Because this has become commonplace?
	Now because this has accepted standards?
	Or do we have to have some kind of objective standard?
	And is there a reason that we said, thou shalt not steal?
	You know, there's real pragmatic consequences for this, besides what God said.
	So, again, is he going to run in 2024?
	This is all the buzz, and of course we know that he's been angling for that.
	This is why he was engaging with DeSantis.
	You know, all this talk about the debate, but they were even, you know, firing stuff back and forth.
	You know, DeSantis and a lot of his backers looking at this stuff and saying, well, you know, Trump, he's got all these legal problems.
	Maybe he's not going to make it through that.
	And, of course, Trump, people have already forgotten the 2022 election.
	Where Trump basically destroyed the Republican Party's chances of taking over the Senate by putting up people and pushing forward people like Dr.
	Oz and Blake Masters and all the rest of this stuff.
	People that have no principles, but they are celebrities, they look good, they're connected to the right people, that type of thing.
	And so the Republican Party, which should have had a massive red tide, We're good to go.
	Saying they don't want Biden to run again.
	So he's obviously positioning himself.
	There's no doubt about it.
	But if he runs, he's going to have these pictures of shuttered Beverly Hills and all the rest of these places that have been driven out of business.
	But it's even worse than that.
	Not only is the governor going to be characterized by people grabbing stuff and running for the exits, But grabbing nuisance is also a nuisance to parents and to families.
	They have a California judge has said that he's blocked a notification policy by a school district.
	Chino Valley Unified School District put in a parental notification policy.
	If your kid thinks that they're a different gender, the parents need to be notified.
	The reason that's there is because you don't want them groomed.
	And like I talked about last week, you look at the grooming tactics that have now surfaced in Andrew Tate's and his organization's emails.
	We've got to cut this girl off from her support network and her family and all the rest of the stuff.
	This is what criminals always do.
	This is what traffickers, sex traffickers, pedophiles, pimps like Andrew Tate, this is what they always do.
	They cut you away from everybody else so they can dominate you.
	And then they, you know, the other thing that Andrew Tate does, which is what they do in schools as well, got to take that off your bag.
	You can't do this. You can't say that.
	We're going to, you know, make some arbitrary rules and punish you for violating those arbitrary rules.
	It's classic. It's done across the spectrum.
	You know, whether you're talking about a pornographer like Tate or whether you're talking about these schools, they don't want the parents to know what's going on.
	And so this school district said, well, we're going to tell the parents.
	So now a California judge says you can't.
	I'm not going to allow that to happen.
	And it's not just the judge.
	This was the California Attorney General, Rob Bonta, who created this lawsuit.
	So the California Attorney General creates the lawsuit and gets the judge to agree with him.
	So the California Attorney General and the judge agree.
	Parents are not supposed to know what their kids are doing.
	And the school. The school grooms them to tell them that they're in the wrong body and you're not supposed to know about it, says the establishment in California.
	The California judge went so far as to say parents pose a, quote, clear and present danger.
	Wow. Parents are a clear and present danger to LGBTQ students.
	He's right. Because the parents would tell them they're playing mind games with you.
	You don't want to do that.
	See, they talk about this being a genocide because they create the LGBTQ kids by mind games, by propaganda, by deception, by grooming.
	That's how they propagate themselves.
	They're not propagating themselves biologically.
	They're doing it psychologically.
	And so...
	The temporary restraining order was issued in response to a California Attorney General Rob Bonetta's lawsuit against that district saying, you will not tell parents what we are doing to the kids.
	And then it gets even worse than that.
	Now, the entire state legislature, as well as the governor, as they're working on a law to prevent anybody from, not just the cops, cops, you can't arrest these people.
	It's just a misdemeanor if they're stealing stuff.
	And, you know, people who work in the store, you can't do anything to stop the theft.
	We're going to prohibit that. Now, the state of California is going to prohibit parents keeping their kids.
	Not only are they going to tell the school district that you cannot inform, even if the school district wants to tell the parents what's going on, the school district's not allowed to do that.
	And now they're going to say, as that judge said, parents are a clear and present danger to this LGBT stuff.
	Now the state is threatening to take kids away from parents if they do not affirm transgenderism.
	Yeah, now the governor is grabbing kids.
	Governor nuisance.
	California may soon require judges to consider if a parent affirms their child's gender identity when making custody decisions.
	They're already doing it in many places in terms of adoption.
	This would be when there is a divorce and child custody fight, that type of thing.
	The person who's going to get the child is the person who thinks that they ought to be psychologically groomed.
	You see, this always comes down.
	This has been decades in development.
	The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
	This is why they always wanted to talk about children's rights and why, you know, the children do not belong to the parents.
	Isn't that interesting? You know, Melissa Harris-Perry and MSNBC and Biden and all the rest of them.
	You've got to get over this idea that the children belong to you.
	But isn't that the whole theory under which abortion operates?
	Yeah, the children belong to you.
	It's just, you know, you can do with them whatever you want.
	You want to kill the kid? Okay, kill the kid.
	If you don't want to kill the kid and somebody attacks a pregnant woman and kills a pregnant woman and her baby, two counts of murder.
	But if you want to kill the kid, since the kid belongs to you, you can kill the kid.
	But when the kid's born, no, you can't do anything about it.
	That's what I said. They don't support freedom of choice for anything other than murdering babies.
	That's the left. When it comes to how to educate your kid, They don't support that.
	When it comes to medical care for yourself, your body, your choice, no.
	No. We'll make that choice for you.
	And we'll make that choice for your kid, too.
	As a parent, you don't get to choose the medical care for your child, the education for your child, none of that stuff.
	But the child does belong to you at the point that you want to kill them, you know, so you can abort them.
	That is the...
	So obviously dishonest.
	This is... About not having to get involved after a child has been beaten and had their arm broken or after they've been kicked out.
	This is about, not about physical abuse or anything like that.
	This is about, we're going to propagate this LGBT stuff.
	And parents and family is not going to be allowed to get in the way.
	Our primary value, as we have been told by these people who are pushing us into war with Russia, our primary value is LGBT. That's what we're about.
	We've heard it from the British defense people.
	We've heard it from the Biden administration and the Pentagon.
	Our primary purpose here is LGBT. Tell me these people are not satanic.
	They hate the family. They hate life.
	They want to eradicate humanity by war, by sterilization, by degeneracy.
	So Washington, state of Washington, passed a law in May allowing the state to not inform parents if their child runs away from home.
	In order to access sex change procedures in Washington and all the rest of this stuff.
	Yeah, it is grooming. It is trafficking.
	It is classic.
	Classic stuff here.
	And so, not only are they doing all that, but now in a proactive way, California State Assembly has now declared August to be Transgender History Month, beginning next year.
	We've already got a Pride Month, and now I guess what they're going to do is they're going to go right through their little alphabet, you know, LGBT. And I guess we can certainly got enough of their imaginary degeneracy that we could have a history celebration every month for the LGBT spectrum.
	Every month, a different one of these things.
	It truly is amazing what is happening in California.
	Grabbin Nuisance thinks that he's going to run for president?
	So, and it's not just in California, and it's not just in Washington, D.C. or Washington State.
	Oklahoma. Oklahoma.
	They have hired, as a school principal, a guy, a 52-year-old guy, who is a drag queen.
	I call them dragons.
	Who was arrested on child pornography charges.
	Who was doing probation for drug charges.
	So drugs, child pornography, and a drag queen.
	And in Oklahoma, conservative Oklahoma, Republican state, they've decided the school board has that they want him as principal.
	Folks, it's time that we defund the schools.
	Come on. Let's start that move.
	Defund the schools.
	You'll be surprised at how much money it is costing you.
	We've got to defund these schools.
	School does not equal education.
	As a matter of fact, everybody should understand by now, it's about conditioning.
	And the conditioning has become so vile, we just need to stop this.
	But you can get educated without the school.
	You can get a real education instead of being miseducated.
	This person, Dr.
	Shane Brent Murnan, 52, hired as an elementary school principal in Oklahoma.
	He had put out on Facebook and then took it down.
	He celebrated a new district and new respect for me, right?
	Mernan had his personal devices confiscated by police in 2001 on suspicion of possession of child pornography.
	Then a fifth grade teacher.
	He was arrested two weeks after that was confiscated.
	But then an appeals court judge said it was, quote, clear from a review of the pictures that they do not represent child pornography.
	Do you remember when we had this discussion with the Supreme Court Justice, Brown Jackson?
	And she said, well, you know, I think we're just really too hard on people with child pornography.
	It's a very subjective thing, and, you know, everybody does it.
	And, you know, the whole idea that that's the new morality.
	We don't have any objective standards about any of this stuff.
	And, of course, have you really done some forensic test to determine the age of the kids in the pictures and everything?
	All of these different prevarications that they used to get out, and the judge bought that, and so they released him.
	He was not convicted of this, because he had a judge that was like Brown Jackson, who doesn't, frankly, have a problem with this stuff.
	In August of 2002, they obtained, he said, I got the pictures by accident.
	I don't know how that stuff got on there.
	It's not what you think, right?
	And so they said, and we also cannot prove, we can't prove how he got these pictures and we can't prove the age of the individuals here.
	But they fired him nevertheless because that was 20 years ago.
	21 years ago.
	Now here we are 21 years later and you don't fire people for that kind of stuff.
	You make them the school principal.
	He even had to complete probation over a drug charge.
	And so when people found out about this and they contacted the Oklahoma City Public Schools, they said, well, we understand.
	I'm sorry, the Western Heights Public Schools, the one that hired him.
	They said, well, we understand the situation may cause concern and questions among parents, staff, and community members.
	But, you know, hey, that's tough.
	Defund the schools. Defund the schools.
	We've got to stop giving them money.
	We've got to cut them off.
	The corruption is just unbelievable.
	It is, yeah, unusual hiring practices.
	I just saw a report out of Houston where they found this.
	You talk about unusual hiring practices.
	They found this corrupt city government and this corrupt police department that was north of Houston in a couple of hours.
	And there's reports that were done by KHOU 11 in Houston.
	This is a town of only 250 people, but they had 50 cops writing tickets to people with the interstate that ran through there.
	And making millions in terms of fines every year.
	The whole thing was a racket. And then it got even worse as they started looking at this.
	They looked at the resumes of the cops that had been hired in this small town.
	It's called Coffee City. Coffee City.
	And to their credit, KHOU stayed on this thing for a while.
	They investigated. They found that at least half of the cops that had been hired in this speed trap city, at least half of them had been fired for inappropriate behavior.
	You know, ranging from excessive force and, you know, abuse as a cop to just individuals who had been arrested because they were drunk driving or driving under the influence or something like that, including the police chief who had a charge of driving under the influence, and he never even bothered to respond to it in that jurisdiction.
	I don't know why they didn't arrest him, but...
	Anyway, they found all this stuff, and then they found that these guys were working as private security guards in Houston.
	I think that's one of the things that got into that.
	They were working as private security guards, and they kept calling the Houston Police Department and saying, I want this person arrested.
	They talked back to me and that type of thing.
	And the police chief in Houston was getting so much of that stuff, he contacted the district attorney.
	The district attorney told him, well, just ignore them.
	That got them really angry.
	But they supplied footage, like ring doorbell footage of some of the stuff on the police chief who was there working in Houston.
	The police chief of that small town.
	Was working as a security guard in Houston.
	And they found a whole slew of officers that were working as security guards.
	And get this. Full time.
	Full time. In Houston and still pulling a salary up in Coffee City.
	And so they got some big changes.
	Those people got fired.
	The police chief got fired.
	So it's made some changes.
	They need to change...
	The people running that town, because they had to know that all this stuff was going on.
	I mean, if you go out and you hire 50 cops in a town of 250 people, I think the town council and those people know what's going on as well, don't you?
	Well, we're going to take a...
	But again, I mention that because we need to look at all of these institutions.
	As Frank Serpico said, every institution is run by humans.
	And you're going to have bad people in every institution.
	So the question is, are you going to purge the institution, or are you going to, if the institution doesn't purge these people out, then you have to purge the institution, because the institution, if it embraces that corruption, is a corrupt organization.
	This is what's happening in that Oklahoma city.
	This is, in many ways, worse than what is going on in Coffee City, where they're shaking people down for traffic violations and making millions off of people with a predatory police force.
	Because this is predatory on your kids.
	You know, will the conservative people in Oklahoma, you know, we're just Merle Haggard when we need him, you know?
	Will the conservative people in Oklahoma, will they do something about this?
	They're going to let this guy?
	Dragon with child porn and drug charges and all the rest of this stuff?
	Well, he didn't prove it. Not to my satisfaction.
	Not to this judge's satisfaction.
	Yeah, right. We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, welcome back.
	And a comment and a tip from Mr.
	Goldfold on Rockfin.
	Thank you very much, sir. He says, Lowe's in Georgia fired a female 68-year-old clerk.
	She was beaten by several thugs when resisting their looting.
	Lowe's hired her back within 72 hours after all of the negative PR. Public pressure and boycotts work.
	Yeah, that's true. That's true.
	Well, I'm glad that they hired her back.
	That might be the same one that I was thinking of.
	I didn't know that she was hired back.
	I'm thinking that's the same thing because I think it was a Lowe's and I think it was in Georgia.
	I just was not aware of the public pressure and boycotts, so thank you for letting me know that and not following up on that.
	And let me thank people who have, these are some of the people who have sent us a donation in the mail.
	I just want to thank them.
	Timur R., Anita S., Bob I., Tina and Michael G., Mary N., H.D., Robert F., William M., Lois L., Jeremy W., Ben O., Pam and Dave G., Chuck G., Marty K., Richard R., and Bethany H. Thank you very much.
	And I don't know if they've updated the gas gauge or not, but I think we are at quarter.
	And so I'm not sure if that's been updated on the website, but I really do appreciate it.
	Again, if you want to see where we are, you can...
	And where you can find the program.
	We make the program available for free.
	And you can see all the different places where it's available as a podcast.
	Sometimes it can be hard if you go to your podcast provider and you search for the name of the program.
	Many times it does not show up.
	So if you could like the podcast, even better if you write a review, that helps the visibility, I think.
	We never know because they play these games.
	The only podcast that does not carry us is Spotify.
	But we're carried everywhere else.
	And so, if you don't see it, take a look at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	We also have links where you can find the program.
	Video versions of it and we also cut out short segments of the program as well each day.
	We put up two or three different segments and we also always pull out the interviews separately as well.
	So you can find the links to that and where you can watch it and where you can watch the program live as we have many people who are watching it right now live.
	So we really do appreciate your support and it's because of you that we're here.
	And it really does help us, even just a small amount.
	If we can get a reasonable percentage of people just giving a small amount, that's not really the way that it has worked.
	A lot of people don't contribute anything.
	We have a few people who are real heroes who keep this program going, and it's just a few who do.
	So thank you for those of you who do.
	And the rest, we'd say, if you'd consider even just a $5 contribution, that would help.
	Be way more money than we needed even if everybody did that.
	But so few people who do, things get kind of touch and go.
	But let's talk a little bit about the masks and some legislation that's been introduced and also about Megyn Kelly.
	She's very excited that she is about to interview President Trump for the first time in 10 years, she said.
	I did not realize that he didn't grant her any Direct personal interviews when he was running for president or even as president.
	There was a lot of back and forth between them.
	She made some very, you know, I'm an offended woman type of comments during the debate where she was one of the questioners there.
	On Rockfin, thank you very much, Andromeda.
	Appreciate that. Thank you very much.
	Anyway, this fall's COVID variant might really be different, says Wall Street Journal.
	You mean they're not faking it this time?
	The wolves of Wall Street Journal have been crying wolf for so long that nobody believes them.
	But this time, you've got to be afraid.
	This could be the real thing this time.
	It wasn't the real thing in 2020 or 2021.
	None of these, the Omicron, the rest of this stuff.
	No, no, no. This might be the real thing this time.
	So be afraid.
	Be very afraid. And then again, as Megyn Kelly is saying, even as she's talking about And I'm very excited.
	She cut like a 10-minute video, which I didn't watch all of it.
	I just, you know, she's got a video about this that she's interviewing him.
	Oh, yeah, I've talked to all these different presidential candidates, but there's one that I haven't done.
	He's coming up to 10 minutes about how she's so excited to talk to President Trump.
	And yet, she told her guest, writer David Zweig, that she regrets having gotten his shot.
	Now, she doesn't call it the Trump shot.
	She calls it the COVID-19 vaccine because we don't want to associate that with Donald Trump, do we?
	Not if you want to make a living.
	Explaining on her show Wednesday that she would have been better off without it.
	She said she was glad that her children had not been vaccinated amid the heavy pressure to do so during the pandemic.
	She said, I thank God that I didn't stick them with that vaccine.
	I'm sorry I did it to myself.
	I regret getting the vaccine.
	I don't think I needed it, she said.
	I think I would have been fine.
	I'd gotten COVID many times, and it was well past when the vaccine was doing what it was supposed to be doing.
	What is she talking about?
	I've got to say, I've talked to a lot of people in media.
	And as I said, there was an extended interview when she came to InfoWars and she was, you know, they were kicking off the Sandy Hook attacks on Alex Jones.
	They sent her there as a vanguard for that.
	And that interview was supposed to be recorded.
	I wish it had been recorded, but dude did not turn it on.
	So we did not get a tape of it.
	But, you know, we talked about a lot of stuff and I was just amazed.
	As somebody who is a lawyer, somebody who's in media, and how uninformed she was about so many things, about big issues too.
	You know, like civil asset forfeiture and the war on drugs.
	She's a lawyer as well as somebody in this.
	She just depends on what people tell her and what they put on the teleprompter.
	And that's what got her into this situation personally.
	She said after being vaccinated and then boosted again, And then having COVID, because the vaccine and the booster didn't work, she began suffering from an autoimmune issue, she said.
	And then for the first time, I tested positive for autoimmune issue in my annual physical.
	And I went to the best rheumatologist in New York.
	In other words, most expensive.
	And I asked her...
	Do you think this could have to do with the fact that I got the booster and then got COVID within three weeks?
	And she said yes, and I wasn't the only one she'd seen that with.
	But two years ago, as Western Journal points out, I'm sorry, it wasn't Western.
	Yeah, it was originally Western Journal.
	It was on WND as well.
	As I point out, two years ago, she was very dismissive of vaccine fears.
	Because as usual, Megyn Kelly was totally uninformed about what was going on.
	She had no idea where she was in the universe, what these people have been practicing for the last 20 years.
	She didn't understand the annual flu shot game that they were playing on everybody.
	None of that. She had no context for any of this stuff.
	And so when somebody said something about the Johnson& Johnson vaccine, she jumps in and she says, nothing to worry about.
	I'm getting the Johnson& Johnson vaccine this weekend, April 2021.
	I have zero qualms because I have spent a life immersed in media, obsessed with fear-mongering that is often irresponsible and untrue.
	Do what your doctor tells you to do and ignore everyone else.
	Well, I think they didn't really care what doctors were telling people.
	The doctor told you to get some ivermectin.
	They would take that doctor's license.
	Did she not know that?
	You know, the bottom line is, yes, they are obsessed with fear-mongering.
	But you've got to know what is real and what isn't.
	They want you to fear things that you don't need to be afraid of because they don't want you to fear the things that you should be afraid of, like the vaccine, like the Trump shot.
	So, she said she has now permanently altered her future because she trusted authority figures.
	Oh, she didn't say that. They said that at Western Journal.
	She altered her future because she trusted authority figures who understand nothing but power and greed.
	And she interviews these people, and she doesn't understand that?
	She has face-to-face with all these top-level politicians, and she's totally clueless about what they're about?
	In her case, I think that's true.
	A lot of people, I think, you know better.
	Come on, you're just lying to people.
	I really think she doesn't have a clue.
	Again, I talked to her for a very long time.
	She interviewed me for a very long time.
	But that was her career path at Fox News.
	She would just have trusted authority figures who were there.
	She had this big entourage of people who wrote the news for her, put it on.
	And they came around. They asked us.
	They said, how do you put the news together?
	You know, who runs the meetings?
	We decide what's going to be covered and the angles that you're going to cover it.
	And it's like, nothing like that happens around here.
	We all do our own stuff.
	We do our own research.
	What? What? You do your own research?
	Said the handler who was going around with a notepad collecting stuff for Kelly.
	Last year, Kelly announced that her sister, who she said had been in very good health, died from a sudden heart attack at the age of 58.
	Now she's come forward to share her story and her regrets.
	And as I said in Western Journal, becoming a beacon of light, warning others about the possible dangers of blind obedience to so-called experts.
	What about warning people about blind obedience and blindly following somebody like Donald Trump, who put Fauci in charge of everything and did 2020 commercials talking about how faithfully he had executed Fauci's orders?
	They campaigned on being Fauci's puppet.
	So we'll see.
	We'll see what she does. And she's bragging about the fact she's finally landed an interview with Trump.
	She hasn't talked to him for a decade.
	I can guarantee you that she will not, not challenge him on any of this stuff.
	She's not going to challenge him on the Trump shot, just like Tudor Dixon didn't.
	Tudor Dixon goes off as, you know, we got heart attacks, myocarditis, and blood clots, and all this other kind of stuff.
	Don't you think we should start testing these vaccines before Biden puts out a new one?
	Oh yeah, I think you probably should test that before you do a new one.
	What about yours? She didn't say that, right?
	She allowed Trump to completely escape any responsibility for this vaccine that he not only endlessly, shamelessly promoted for the year that they were developing it, rolling it out, and he was, you know, shoveling unbelievable amounts of money to them, but they continued to push it for another three years.
	It's just this spring.
	You know, after he had done it for three years, he finally shut up about it, and now he's reinventing himself as Mr.
	Anti-vax. Oh, yeah, you know, we should actually do some tests on this stuff before we rolled out, if Biden is doing it.
	Same thing, Biden. I'm not taking that.
	Trump put that out without testing it.
	But then, as soon as he gets in, I'm going to mandate it.
	The thing that I was saying wasn't going to work was dangerous.
	And so she's going to have a 10-minute video.
	Ari has a 10-minute video about her gushing about her interview that is coming up with the failed casino owner.
	Reality TV. There's no reality in it.
	Biden, it comes out in a book that was released this week.
	The book was The Last Politician.
	And in the book...
	They say that as Biden's team scrambled to tackle the coronavirus in 2021, the president would quip during meetings that his then White House chief medical advisor, Anthony Fauci, should sit in the vice president's chair.
	When the president assembled his COVID team, he would jokingly direct Fauci to sit in the vice president's chair.
	You know what he said?
	I can imagine what Fauci said.
	No thanks. I don't want to be the vice president.
	I've always been the president.
	Ha! Last year I was president all year.
	I don't need that. I'm not taking the demotion.
	Besides, it'd be a massive pay cut, right?
	He makes more money than the president does.
	The vice president makes half as much money as the president, but he makes more than both of them.
	Why would he do that? It'd be a demotion for him.
	No, he ran both the Trump and the Biden presidency.
	Yeah. The book, The Last Politician, he says Fauci had, quote, unparalleled access to the tight inner circle of advisors who surrounded Biden for decades.
	For his part, Fauci, quote, struggled to contain his exuberance about working with Biden.
	Yeah. This guy who is a flatterer, again, you know, he's very exuberant about how much he loved working for Trump.
	He'll flatter anybody and everybody.
	That's the way flatterers are. You know, they flatter you to your face and then they stick the knife in your back when you're not around.
	When Fauci made his way to the podium in the White House briefing room for the first time after the Biden inauguration, he felt a surge of traumatic memories wash over him, writes the author.
	For the first time in years, he was no longer in the awkward position of having to correct the president that he served.
	And Trump, again, writes, does that commercial.
	I've played for you several times.
	I'll play it again today.
	He did a commercial about how obedient Trump was to Fauci.
	That was how he was campaigning in 2020.
	Biden would harangue Fauci during his first month of presidency.
	He says, when is the nation going to return to normal?
	You hear that? It's Fauci giving the orders.
	When, you know, as Simon says, you know, a game of Simon says, a game of Fauci says, when can we do this?
	When can we do that?
	And this is the way it was happening through both Trump and Biden.
	When can we return to normal?
	When can we do? The president was deeply reliant on the controversial figure's advice for assistance and assistance, so much so that when other public health officials attempted to draft an answer, Biden would disregard them and ask to speak to Fauci.
	Yes. Bring in the wizard.
	We have to listen to him.
	Later, when new variants, variants of the ones that really matter, we were told this of every one of them, they all really matter.
	When new variants of the coronavirus began making their way to the U.S., Biden pressured Fauci to discover whether the corona vaccine would protect people.
	Brought him in. He said, soothsayer.
	Say a sooth. Tell me.
	And Fauci said, no, it's going to take us weeks to find this out here.
	No, actually, it would take you years if you actually did the test, but we're not going to disperse with that.
	In Germany. In Germany.
	And this is from Eugypius, and he's absolutely right.
	It's what I've said. They don't care.
	The major parties in Germany don't care at all about investigating this thing because they've all had a hand in it, just like Murder on the Orient Express.
	Every one of these leaders, every one of these political parties came in and stuck us to kill us, to kill our children, to kill our society.
	And so the only one who wasn't involved in that in Germany, writes Eugypius, is the Alternative for Deutschland, AFD. And he said the only place where they have sufficient political clout and majority to hold an investigation is in Brandenburg.
	And so they did that.
	They summoned these people, the guy who was essentially the German version of Fauci, And his name is Lothar.
	It's like a mythological villain.
	Lothar Wheeler, the German counterpart to Fauci.
	And another person, Bridget Keller Stanislavski, who is head of the Department of Pharmaceutical Safety.
	So, this would be like their FDA. So, they got like the NIH guy and the FDA guy coming in there.
	Woman. And so, he said, you know, the journalists who hung on every word that this German Fauci said, Lothar, They were not interested in reporting what was going on in this investigation in Brandenburg.
	But the guy comes in and as they're talking to them about the injuries and about the effectiveness, they said, well, we've received so many reports that we can't handle them.
	We've received so many injury reports that we've been overwhelmed.
	And we had to get help from other departments because we didn't have enough people to handle the adverse events.
	And they didn't just start evaluating these things yesterday, as Eugypia says.
	They've been doing this for many years.
	But the problem is, they said we published all its reviews on adverse events so far, only on the basis of self-initiated reports from physicians and affected patients.
	And we see the same thing we see here in the United States, that, you know, it's a very cumbersome, time-consuming process for the physician to report it, so they typically don't.
	You know, it's like Harvard years ago said only 1% of these things are reported because it's so cumbersome.
	And so same thing is happening with us.
	But even with that, they have so many that they can't keep up with it.
	I wonder how many there really are.
	And in addition to that, they've never bothered to complete their own study of whether or not it was effective.
	Lothar Weiler.
	I like the name Lothar better.
	He said only shortly before, he had told the committee that monitoring the effectiveness of vaccination was the central task of his organization.
	But, you know, we've seen this in the U.S. as well.
	They created the VAERS thing because they gave legal immunity to the vaccine companies.
	But then they never went back and looked at any of this stuff.
	They said, yeah, we'll give them legal immunity and we'll create this database and we'll use that to make vaccines safer.
	And so there was a lawsuit and they fought that lawsuit to find out, well, what recommendations have you made?
	And when it came to the end and they had to turn over the data, they said, well, we've never even really looked at it.
	Same thing here. But here's a final thing that I think is very interesting about this.
	As this Fauci guy, Lothar, is testifying, there was another guy that accompanied him.
	And this guy was from the Federal Ministry of Health.
	His name is Heiko Rotman Grossner.
	He testified that his task was to ensure that Wheeler, Lothar, was complying with his leave to testify.
	And so he required authorization to provide information.
	And they said, these are official government secrets.
	You see, in the same way that this whole thing is being run by the CIA and the intelligence community, same thing in Germany as well.
	You know, it's these people who've been doing the germ games on a regular basis.
	And it's these people who come in when this guy's called in, finally get the AFD, he's got enough political majority to run an investigation, the only one done, then they have this guy follow him in there.
	And as... They're asking him questions.
	This goon to protect the secrets, this grossner.
	He's giving the guy hand signals.
	You can't say, no, don't say anything about that.
	And even passing him notes.
	And they got the people who were running the committee so angry, they said, move him.
	And they moved two seats away from the guy, so he couldn't pass him notes and tell him what to say, what he could and could not say.
	And they said, Eugypia says, Rothman Grossner is not just anybody.
	He's the former head of the health security subdivision.
	See? Same as it is here.
	He was an eager and early advocate for lockdowns, probably because they've been practicing it, you know, for 20-plus years, and other heavy restrictions.
	He demanded a nationwide shutdown as early as February the 24th, the very day that the WHO endorsed Chinese mass containment.
	And so Eugypius concludes by saying, it's hard for me to put into words what a scandal this is.
	The Federal Republic forced literally millions of Germans to receive not just one, not just two, but at least three of these Trump shots that posed a genuine risk to them.
	In many cases, the state threatened unemployment for noncompliance.
	They shut the unvaccinated out of public life for months.
	They even tried to mandate vaccination via the Bundestag.
	Despite these grave violations of personal autonomy and bodily integrity, These crimes and justified them with relentless lies about virological doom now plead that their offices simply don't have the time to establish how safe or effective they are.
	Three years on the jabs.
	They continue to promote.
	It's a lot of work, but they're understaffed, you know.
	There's just so much data to go through.
	Finally. Yeah, finally.
	Here in the U.S., CDC repeatedly advising people, even after they've been injured, to get more doses.
	I just think it's very interesting, you know, the Deagle.com, that everybody, what is this thing?
	And then they took it down a year or two ago.
	And, you know, in Deagle, they had it raise a lot of people's eyebrows.
	They said, look, here's the population of the United States, and we project that by 2025 it's going to be down by two-thirds.
	Like, wow. And I just, somebody mentioned that the other day, and I thought about that, and I said, you know, two-thirds of people got the jab.
	And they're saying the population is going to be down by two-thirds.
	And you know, two-thirds is kind of an interesting number because when you look at the Milgram experiment and people's obedience to authority, that works on about two-thirds of the people.
	And you look at peer pressure, the ASH experiment, that was also about two-thirds of the people.
	Did they kind of look at this and say, you know, we'll be able to browbeat about two-thirds of the people to be able to get a toxic...
	Population-reducing, untested, dangerous mRNA thing.
	I think maybe it's just a coincidence, right?
	I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
	Nothing to think about there at all.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we have Gerald Salenti ready to join us.
	Anxious to talk to Gerald.
	Carol, we'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	The David Knight Show dot com.
	Thank you.
	All right, welcome back. And joining us now is Gerald Slenty.
	Always great to have Gerald on.
	And Trends Journal is where, trendsjournal.com, is where you'll find his publication.
	Great publication. He does it on a weekly basis.
	A tremendous amount of information.
	Covers a spectrum of so many different topics.
	And you can see a sample of that if you go to trendsjournal.com.
	And it's set up in an online magazine format.
	Great publication.
	A lot of work goes into that and a lot of information for you.
	Again, if you want to subscribe to that, you can get 10% off if you use the code NIGHT. But Gerald Salenti has always been also about Occupy Peace.
	And I want to begin today, Gerald, by talking about what is going on in Ukraine.
	This last week, as we've seen, that this place is being turned into a literal no-man's land with all the Cluster bombs and mines and everything that both sides are putting in.
	They lost the first Challenger 2 tank.
	You know, these are these state-of-the-art tanks.
	And, of course, they disappeared just like all the rest of them because the people there are not really trained.
	They don't have the proper support.
	And everybody writes all these articles about that.
	But meanwhile, they're saying they've lost at least 400,000 troops just on the Ukrainian side in this war.
	It's just amazing. And it continues to escalate, doesn't it?
	Yeah, that arrogant little boy, Anthony Blinken.
	Oh, don't you know who my daddy was?
	I went to Dalton.
	I went to Harvard. Yeah, a member of the murderous little clown of nothing.
	Every war this guy has supported since he's been in Washington under the Obama administration, on and on and on.
	On and on and on.
	Just as over there in Ukraine.
	Giving, stealing another billion dollars of our money to keep bloodying the killing fields over there.
	Spewing out the crap that Ukraine's counter-offensive is making progress.
	Oh, now they call it the summer counter-offensive?
	It began as a spring counter-offensive.
	It didn't start to the summer.
	They got a late start. Yeah, they got a late start.
	I remember when the trailer was like, we're coming for you, you know?
	It was such a joke, really, you know?
	It's like Zelensky and all these other people, it's coming, it's coming, it's coming.
	It's just ridiculous. It was like rolling out a new movie or something, because it is.
	That's what it is. It's a narrative.
	Again, it's a movie when you look at the clown playing the president of Ukraine.
	Yeah. A guy that used to be a sitcom star that played the piano with his penis.
	Yeah, that's literally true.
	Yeah, you can Google it up.
	Go to YouTube, put Zelensky plays piano with his penis.
	It's right there. You can't make this stuff up.
	He was a pianist.
	Yeah. Well, you know, I look at this, and what is really an outrage, and a lot of people have looked at this in a lot of different ways, the fact that the people in Hawaii are not getting any help at all from the federal government.
	$700 a person.
	If somebody said, take the amount of money that they're giving to Ukraine, it would be a half a million dollars a person or something.
	That's what it's really costing. But instead, they're getting $700.
	And another way to look at this is Kiev is spending $100 million per day.
	$100 million per day.
	And the corruption is so bad they had to have a scapegoat this last week.
	The corruption is so bad.
	Again... We wrote about this as it was happening.
	You know, the Trends Journal, the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Viktor Yanukovych somewhere in 2014.
	The European Union called Ukraine the most corrupt country in Europe.
	The latest poll that just came out on August 13th 89% of the Ukrainian people, 89%, so we're saying 90% of the people, said corruption after the war was the most important problem that the people were suffering from.
	89% of Ukrainians know how bad the corruption is, and we, they're stealing our money to support this corrupt country.
	With the crap, with the crap, with the crap spewing out of the mouth of Antony Blinken that if we don't stop those Russians there, all of Europe will be, you know, in trouble and the rest of the world if we don't stop the Russians.
	Hey, Blinken, why don't you go over there, put on your costume, and go over there and fight or shut your mouth?
	Anybody that wants to support the Ukraine war, go over there, put on your military drag, go fight, send your money, send your wife, send your kids, send your transgenders, go over there or shut your mouth.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. Absolutely.
	Yeah, it's interesting, you know, and we've been told this forever.
	The EU, as you just pointed out, said Ukraine was the most corrupt country in the world.
	Gates said it. Bill Gates said it.
	The people of Ukraine, as you point out, said 89% of them said corruption is our big issue, even with war.
	It's a close second. And yet, this week, I saw, I didn't read the article, I just saw the headline on Drudge Report, Russia is the most corrupt country on earth.
	It's like, seriously, who said that?
	Was it Blinken? I don't know who said that.
	But that's how they take this stuff and they spin it around.
	I'm sure that Russia's got issues, but they're trying to counter what is really exploding in terms of this Ukrainian corruption.
	Everybody's starting to ask, wait a minute, where did the money go?
	Where did the weapons go? You're reselling these weapons?
	And it's so bad that he has to fire people, and they have to create a narrative saying, oh no, they're not as corrupt as Russia is.
	I mean, it truly is amazing what they will do to hide the truth.
	Yep. Well, you know, again, to hide the truth.
	We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.
	William J. Casey, the head of the CIA back in 1981.
	Yeah, while Bill Casey.
	Yep. He ran all that Iran-Contra stuff.
	He went to Iran and said, don't release the hostages until after the election and everything.
	Yep. Yeah, he was a piece of work, wasn't he?
	Well, you know, I think the solution for Hawaii...
	I'm sorry, go on.
	I think the solution for Hawaii, I think they need to secede.
	If they leave the United States, maybe as a foreign entity, we'd throw some cash at them.
	And if they set themselves up as a foreign military base or something, or as an island that's threatened by China, if they reposition themselves that way, then they get all kinds of aid that way.
	What do we do? I mean, it's not...
	Everything that they have is directed.
	All the benefits are directed.
	For their empire.
	And of course, for Americans, we get nothing.
	You know, you get less than, I think it's people who are coming in as illegal immigrants get $2,200, but somebody on Social Security is going to get $1,400.
	This is what they're doing.
	I mean, they just, they hate America.
	Anything for anybody outside of America.
	So I say Hawaii's real path is secession.
	That's the only thing that they can do at this point.
	Pretend they're not American.
	They can. And then you had this guy, this little clown over there, you had just like two weeks ago, a week and a half ago, Lindsey Graham, a little slob of nothing, Elizabeth Warren,
	another, you know, she reminds me of my kindergarten teacher, And this arrogant, arrogant, lying, arrogant, lying clown up in Connecticut, this Blumenthal, who said that he fought in the Vietnam War.
	He's my age. He beat the draft.
	He got a bunch of deferments.
	And because he's a member of the club, he was in the National Guard in Washington, D.C. But he lied and said he fought in Vietnam.
	They all went to Ukraine.
	And this is what they said.
	During the visit, the bipartisan delegation discussed oversight of USAID to Eastern Europe and received updates on Ukraine's ongoing military efforts to defeat itself from Russia's illegal invasion.
	This is Adam Blumenthal's thing, right?
	Huh. Not an illegal invasion.
	The invasion is illegal, but how about the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Viktor Yanukovych in 2014, brought to you by Victoria Nuland and the Obama administration?
	Yeah. That was fine.
	He goes on, in Kiev, my colleagues and I brought a strong bipartisan message of U.S. and allied support to President Zelensky and senior members of his government.
	Ukraines, you ready to fight?
	You ready for this? Mm-hmm.
	You were just talking about how corrupt they are.
	This is the crap, and I'll say it right in front of his face.
	This is the crap spewing out of Blumenthal's lying, cowardly mouth.
	Ukraine's fight for democracy and freedom against an unprovoked Russian invasion, you ready?
	Is our fight.
	Aren't you happy that that's our fight?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Our fight. Our fight.
	Even though they're not in NATO. If you want to go fight, go fight.
	Yeah. Effectively, they're saying they're in NATO, essentially.
	You know, we've got to fight because they've been attacked, that type of thing.
	And, you know, you go back and you look at the beginning of all this Russia stuff.
	It was all the DNC. It was Alexandria Chalupa and all these other people.
	I interviewed people who were from Ukraine who talked about how the Democrats were colluding to create this false Russia narrative that they were using against Trump.
	It truly is amazing, the corruption that's been there.
	And as I point out, they have to put out these stories about Russia because the corruption is just so incredibly bad.
	You've got a billionaire who has been this big supporter of Zelensky.
	And he's the one who's basically groomed him and pushed him to the top.
	He's got about $2 billion net worth.
	And he's now been arrested.
	Zelensky had to arrest this billionaire.
	And then when you look at...
	And then in addition to that, his defense minister, a guy named Reznikov, was also arrested.
	I mean, they're having... The corruption is so bad that Zelensky, in order to save face, is having to arrest his mentors and his ministers at the same time.
	And the response from the press is pretty much, it didn't happen, it's Russia that's corrupt.
	Yeah. And again, listen to this stuff.
	Again, this is the crap spewing out of the mouth of Blumenthal.
	And it's the same crap, as I said, this Anthony Blinken spewing out and all the rest of the congressional clowns that support this.
	Putin will not stop with Ukraine.
	And failure will only embolden our adversaries.
	We must designate Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism.
	Oh, okay.
	Yeah, the Russians, they destroyed Libya.
	They went into Vietnam.
	Of course the Americans.
	Iraq. Oh yeah, I forgot that, huh?
	Yeah. One war after another.
	And it goes on. This is my fourth trip to Ukraine.
	That we, the clown people of the United States, spent our money to send this jerk over there.
	Morale among, you ready?
	Ukrainian people is sky high.
	Yeah. Yeah, they're loving this stuff, right?
	They love it. They're happy as can be.
	Every day is party day.
	This is the crap that they're putting out.
	They have had the attitude that they are going to have to live free.
	And you ready for this? And they are willing to die for their freedom.
	Wow. Willing to die?
	Willing to die?
	This is the propaganda.
	These are the ignorant, moronic, evil people that we have running our government.
	Oh, and did you hear the dead guy, McConnell, coming out?
	That we can't wobble away from Ukraine?
	Glitch McConnell, yeah.
	Dead and buried, McConnell and Biden.
	Which ones out of their mind more?
	These are the people running our country.
	Don't get angry, Salenti.
	Be a coward like the rest of us and swallow their crap.
	Yeah, the weekend with Bernie bipartisan zombies, you know, it's happening there.
	But yeah, even recycling this rhetoric from 60 years ago, the Vietnam War, right?
	The domino theory.
	It's just, it's ridiculous.
	But I guess they figured this, hey, this is a new generation.
	We can run this same scam again.
	It worked. It worked great with him for Vietnam.
	I remember just before he died, you had McNamara set for a documentary.
	And he said he admitted that years after he went back to Vietnam and he said he met with the Vietnamese leaders that they've been fighting and the guy was still angry with him, stood up and beat his fist on the table and said, what is the matter with you?
	Don't you know anything about a thousand years of history and how the Chinese have always tried to dominate us?
	You were saying that the Chinese were going to take us over?
	We were fighting for our independence from people like you and the French.
	And he goes, you know, McNamara, the whiz kid, didn't know any of that we're supposed to believe, right?
	They knew exactly what they were doing.
	These are evil people.
	They're evil people.
	End of story. You don't ask a murderer why they murdered.
	That's right. You don't ask a thief why they stole.
	A rapist why they raped.
	These are evil, demonic people.
	That's right. End of story.
	Yeah. Oh, I agree.
	I agree. Again, let's...
	Vietnam, you talked about the French, right?
	Mm-hmm. You know, I do a podcast with Judge Napolitano every Wednesday.
	Mm-hmm. And we're talking about what was going on with the...
	Something happened with World War II. And he said, yeah, he said the United States, you know, put sanctions on Japan.
	And it really hurt their economy.
	So I Googled it up.
	Sanctions on Japan. World War II, Roosevelt.
	This is from history today.
	Remember, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941.
	In July of 1941, July, August, September, October, November, December, five months earlier, Roosevelt froze all...
	No, it froze.
	He took, stole all Japanese assets in America.
	Number two, the British and the Dutch joined in with the United States.
	And you know the reason why?
	Why is that? He froze them because those dirty Japanese had the nerve To invade French Indochina.
	French Indochina?
	You mean France going into Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia and murdering and stealing everything they can?
	The tin, the rubber, the natural resources?
	And I love this word colonization.
	How about murderers going into another country, controlling it, stealing it, and killing?
	Yeah. How dare those Japanese try to throw the French out of French Indochina!
	And, you know what those dirty Japanese did?
	They took over Cameron Air Force Base, which is only 800 miles away from the United States, where they were stationed in the Philippines.
	What are we doing in the Philippines?
	Mm-hmm. And what do I care what the Japanese are doing in Vietnam or anywhere?
	It's not my business.
	I'm an American. I am an American!
	I believe in the Founding Fathers!
	I believe in George Washington's farewell address.
	Do not get involved in any foreign entanglements.
	Particularly what's going on in Europe.
	It's been going on for centuries.
	I'm an American patriot.
	All of these other people are traitors to the Founding Fathers.
	So going back. Oh, and those dirty Japanese, they drove the British out of Singapore.
	Why? The sun never sets on the British Empire.
	How dare they throw the British out of Singapore?
	British, the Dutch, the United States.
	Sanctions on Japan.
	They lost three quarters, you can look this up in history today, of their global trade.
	You ready for the next one?
	And 88% of their imported oil.
	They only import 100% of their oil.
	Wow. I can't understand why they bombed Pearl Harbor.
	I haven't been able to figure it out yet.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, sanctions are an act of war.
	And in the same way that we would always, you know, in the days of city-states and castles and things like that, you would put a siege around the castle.
	It's just a much bigger version of that and a higher-tech version of that.
	To put sanctions on. And you kill people with it.
	It's like Madeleine Albright. She didn't even apologize or try to pull it back.
	Oh yeah, we killed a half million kids and it was worth it.
	You know, with sanctions. Yeah, we don't really care about that kind of stuff.
	Yeah, you can see that. By the way, Google it up.
	Leslie Stahl, Madeleine Albright.
	Yeah. Oh yeah. And you can hear her say it.
	Can I tell you a story about how I met Madeleine Albright?
	No. Alright.
	You know, I used to do talks all over the world.
	And... We were leaving on the QE2. And it was for the top marketing executives of the world.
	And Madeline Albright started it off.
	And she didn't go with us when the ship took off.
	So we're down on the west side of New York.
	And she was like the queen of tarts, this thing in this red dress.
	She looked like I was right out of...
	They introduced her.
	Madeleine Albright, born in Czechoslovakia.
	Her father was this. Her mother was that.
	She did this. Her father did that.
	It had to be 10 to 15 minutes, the introduction.
	And then she started going on about how, you know, we're going to stop North Korea and all this stuff.
	Crap. So the next day, I'm the lead-off speaker.
	And they introduced me and the guy, you know, Gerald Salenti, you know, the author of the best-selling book, Trends 2000, Trend Tracking, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	It gives me a nice introduction. I go on stage and I said, thank you very much, Mr.
	Smith, for that introduction. I said, but I feel short-changed after hearing Madeleine Albright's.
	The audience broke up laughing.
	And then I said, and what you fail to mention is that I graduated PS76 in the Bronx without honors when I brought down the house.
	That's my Madeleine Albright story.
	These arrogant, arrogant, arrogant people who think they're better than the rest of us.
	A 15-minute introduction of how I was a member of the club.
	And I got everything I wanted.
	And I told everybody what to do.
	It's one big club and you ain't in it, as George Collins said, and it's a club of murderers and thieves.
	It reminds me of what they used to do with the Austrian emperors.
	When they would die, they'd have this big elaborate ceremony where they would go to the big entourage and they had this big above-ground crypt and they have the people's coffins are there and they've got all these elaborate statues around them of weeping skeletons.
	It was really macabre. It was very strange.
	I saw it. We took the kids there about 22 years ago.
	And But there was a ceremony, and they would show up, and they've had the last one of them went through this ceremony maybe about 15 years ago or something like that.
	But they would show up and they'd knock on the door, and the people inside would say,"'Who goes there?' And they did basically the Madeleine Albright CV. This is so-and-so who owns this, and he's the Grand Duke of this, and the Emperor of that, and all this kind of stuff. And they go on and on and on and on with all of his titles, and the person inside says, I don't know him.
	And they try it again, and they have a little bit shorter one, and he says, no, I don't know him either.
	And then finally they say, Franz Josef, Humble sinner.
	He goes, I know him.
	And they open up the door and they bring him in and put his body in the vault.
	And that's the thing. Madeline Albright, God knows her, you know, and one day she's going to have to answer for that.
	She should rot in hell.
	Yeah. What she's done.
	Yeah. Along with the rest of them.
	Again, I love this line.
	How come they're not spewing out this crap?
	If only women were in charge.
	Sure. There'll be no war if only women were in charge.
	Oh, you like that bear buck over there in Germany?
	That little warmonger?
	No, I know, I know.
	You like Samantha Powers.
	No, no, no. I like Susan Rice.
	I like Condoleezza Rice.
	How about Nikki Haley? How about Nikki Haley?
	The mainstream media loves her because she's such a warmonger.
	She's probably, you know, next to Trump and Biden, maybe Pence too, but she's probably the worst person that could be in there.
	And now they're coalescing around her and pushing her yesterday on Drudge.
	Oh, Nikki Haley is coming up.
	I know. Because she supports war without restriction.
	Going back to the point where she was trying to push us in, she was UN ambassador trying to push us in, boots on the ground in Syria, she and Theresa May using that ridiculous Skripal poisoning quote-unquote thing, saying it was nerve gas, and I call the two of them the Valkyrie.
	I would... Whenever the women came in in advance of the war, I call Theresa May a Nikki Haley the Valkyrie.
	But now, of course, because of that, I think, she's now the darling of the mainstream media.
	And who's that other clown, the NATO lady over there?
	What's her name? The NATO lady?
	Yeah, NATO or the European Union, Vandalin or something.
	Ursula von der Leyen? Yeah.
	Yeah, yeah. A warmonger of the first degree.
	Yeah. A warmonger of the first degree.
	And again, race, creed of color, I'm tired of hearing it.
	Good and bad comes in everybody.
	Oh, how about Colin Powell?
	Yeah, holding up that little colon of crap.
	A little colon of crap, because that's what crap goes through the colon, right?
	Colin Powell, proof that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
	Yeah. Remember that at the UN? Oh yeah, and it was a female who was over that, Gina Haspel, that Trump put in as head of the CIA. There you go.
	We should have females running the CIA as well as the government, right?
	We'll all have peace, right?
	Well, bloody Gina? The woman that loves that, you know, likes to torture people, that one?
	Yeah. Yeah. I'm tired of this crap.
	Yeah. I'm tired of it.
	Oh, I know. You know, if only women were in show.
	What a bunch of crap.
	Look at the ones in short.
	Oh, I forgot. Hillary Clinton.
	How could I forget? Yeah.
	Jab Cinda Arden, who was...
	Yeah, that's what I'm going to do.
	You're going to have to have a vaccine.
	It sounds like you're going to have a vaccine to do anything.
	Yep, yep. That's what I'm saying.
	You're going to have to have it. So I kept calling her Jab Cinda.
	No, it is... In many cases, I think, Gerald, you know, a lot of these women, they've got a chip on their shoulder.
	It's like a Napoleon complex, right?
	Yeah. And so they can be more authoritarian in many cases than even men can be.
	But it isn't really about it.
	It's just this uni party.
	And these people are all part of the club.
	And regardless of what sex or gender they are, regardless of what political party or their stated political ideology or whatever, they all want the same thing.
	And they all want to kill us.
	It's just that simple. Yeah.
	Yeah, it truly is amazing.
	Let's talk a little bit about Europe.
	I mentioned this week the auto show that was in Munich.
	And these people are getting some real angst.
	The German companies, they're looking at...
	China is coming in with a big explosion of models at the German auto show.
	And as everybody is moving into electric vehicles, you've got the German automakers saying this is going to kill us because they've got an edge on us in terms of the supply chain and their access to rare earth minerals and lithium and other things like that.
	We can't really compete with it.
	And as a result, even before the auto industry, which has been one of the key things in Germany, even before that is murdered or commits suicide, you've already got the green agenda in Europe has turned Germany into what the IMF and others are saying now, you've already got the green agenda in Europe has turned Germany into what the IMF So they used to be the strong guys, and they used to be places, they called them the pigs, I think, you know, it was...
	Greece and Spain and Italy and I forget the different acronyms.
	But, you know, they had the different ones that had a bad economy.
	But, you know, Germany was a strong guy.
	Now they're the weak guy.
	And it's all about this climate change green policies.
	What's going on with that? Is there going to be a way they can pull it back?
	No, I wrote an article here.
	Let me see if I can find it.
	Germany is just building up their military, by the way, as Japan is.
	Oh, that'll be the answer, right?
	Here we go. The Fourth Reich.
	Yeah. Right here.
	Germany plans more prominent global role, its defense minister says, in building up their defense.
	Let's go to Germany.
	First, go back to your Trends Journal.
	We've been reporting...
	Germany...
	Was this far away from going into recession in 2019, before the COVID war began in January 2020?
	They were going into a recession then.
	The only thing that's kept Europe from going down was their negative interest rate policy.
	That they began in 2012.
	Negative interest rates.
	That's what artificially propped up these markets.
	After the bust came, the Great Recession in 2008, as I called it, the Panic of 08, everything was going down.
	They weren't recovering from this.
	It was an artificial recovery.
	Now, the COVID war begins.
	They all pump in all this fake money.
	The market should have crashed.
	Everything should have crashed. Who would have thought that they would have kept zero interest rate policy, brought zero interest rate policy in the United States, kept negative in Europe?
	And quantitative easing.
	Buying up government and corporate bonds.
	That's what artificially propped everything up.
	Germany was going down.
	It's the fourth largest economy in the world.
	They are now officially in a recession.
	Now go back to the electric cars.
	Let's go back to another arrogant guy, a little murderous little slimeball that every time he got caught with his pants down, it was bombs away over Baghdad, Bill Clinton, who gave us NAFTA and bringing China into the World Trade Organization.
	Before China came into the World Trade Organization, two weeks, by the way, after 9-11 when nobody saw this happening, And there was a thing in 1999 called the Battle of Seattle when the World Trade Organization was meeting in Seattle, Washington.
	And some 50,000 people took to the streets in protest of bringing China into the World Trade Organization.
	But that didn't make the news.
	All that made the news was these agents provocateurs bashing a couple of windows and putting a car on fire.
	Because the people knew that we would lose our production capabilities.
	And... China couldn't make crap back then.
	Here's the deal. You want to get your stuff made in China?
	Yeah. Come over here.
	You got to open up a corporation, but you only could own 49% of it.
	You give us all out your technology.
	We don't know how to do anything, but you're going to give it to us for free.
	Because we're going to give you cheap labor, so you're going to make a lot of money on your product.
	That's what happened. So now, after 22 years of getting all of the high-tech and heavy industry technology that they didn't have before, China doesn't need the West anymore.
	They got everything they need for them.
	And you can thank the Germans, and you can thank the Americans.
	Our gross domestic product, only 11% of it comes from production.
	Manufacturing. 11%.
	11%.
	Wow.
	Yeah, talk about a bubble.
	And then, of course, the other part of this is besides the technology transfer, it's the energy transfer.
	You know, a lot of people have shown the graph of energy production and CO2 that's emitted or whatever.
	whatever that's their metric but you can see that and you can see the uh over you know a century or so you can see the decline of britain and then the u.s takes the place because they're producing so much stuff then you see um the u.s drop down and china becomes the dominant one because you know when they have the paris climate accord and they say we've got to worry about global warming what do they do they
	they completely ignore emissions from china and from india and let them build as many and as dirty a power plants as possible.
	But in Germany, they're committing suicide in terms of even shutting down their nuclear plants.
	They don't want to have any power there.
	So how are they going to manufacture anything without any power, especially without cheap power?
	They can't be competitive if they've got to compete against China that's building cheap and dirty power plants.
	Nobody can. And not only that, how about putting all the farmers out of work, all those cows that are causing emission standards?
	Yeah. I'm worried more about the politicians' flatulence than I am the cows.
	You could Google it up.
	Some 7 million people die a year from air pollution.
	But watch out for COVID. Yeah.
	And China and India, like about a million people a year die.
	That's why we used to wear the masks all over the place in China because of the air pollution.
	Yeah. Yeah. Now...
	Yeah, especially Wuhan.
	You look at Wuhan, it's one of the worst places even in China.
	You know, you can basically cut the air with a knife and a fork.
	You know, it's ridiculous. And you look at the data, they called it a pandemic.
	I got it right here.
	They called it a pandemic on March 11th, the World Trade Organization, the Whore Trade Organization, WTO, not the World Health Organization, called it a pandemic on March 11th, 2020. Remember, the COVID war breaks out on Chinese Lunar New Year January 2020.
	February, March.
	4,219 people dead.
	Out of 114 countries.
	And you're calling it a pandemic?
	That's nothing. Now, you ready?
	I said 7 million people die a year, according to the, if you Google it up, of air pollution.
	After three years...
	The grand total of 6,822,000 deaths worldwide added 8 billion people allegedly died of COVID. That equals 0.9% of the world's population, which means that 99.91% of us are still alive.
	Yeah. And you're calling this a pandemic?
	And Trump still is. He just went on with Tudor Dixon and she's saying, well, you know, we're seeing all these negative effects, these adverse conditions, heart attacks and everything.
	Don't you think we should be concerned if Biden is going to run out of vaccine without testing it?
	And he goes, oh yeah, it was great what I did.
	It was going to be another 1918 flu if I hadn't done that.
	They declare victory over that.
	See, he saved us all from that, according to his spin, Gerald, because of his shot.
	And he doesn't acknowledge any of this stuff, and neither do...
	This is the thing that drives me nuts.
	There are the sycophants who profit all of this.
	They look at this, it was...
	I think it was Glenn Greenwald who said it.
	So journalism has become identifying what the market is out there and then setting your news up to cater to that market.
	And that's what everybody is doing right now.
	It's like, well, you know, that Trump market, that's pretty big.
	So, you know, whether it's Megyn Kelly or there's Tudor Dixon or whoever it is, they're going to cater to that Trump market.
	And they're going to tell that Trump market whatever they want to hear, which is Trump's vaccines were good, but Biden's vaccines are bad and so on.
	And, you know, he didn't do anything wrong.
	It was all those Democrat governors and all the rest of this stuff.
	Well, Megyn Kelly just came out.
	Megyn Kelly just came out and said how the vaccine hurt her.
	I know. I know. And then she, same day, she comes out and says, now I've got a 10 minute, she does a 10 minute report about how she's got an interview coming up with Donald Trump.
	She hasn't been able to talk to him for 10 years, but now, you know, everybody tune in.
	I'm going to talk to him. And I said, I covered that earlier.
	I said, What are the odds that she's going to challenge him on any of this 2020 stuff?
	Zero. She isn't going to challenge him on anything, especially having to do with the lockdowns and the vaccines.
	None of that. She'll probably challenge him a little bit on the election stuff, but she's not going to challenge him on any of the pandemic stuff.
	None of it. And this is what people also don't know.
	When the election was going on in 2020, Harris and Biden made fun of Trump for pushing through the vaccine.
	Mm hmm. The Operation Warp Speed jab.
	They made fun of him, saying it's something this quick.
	And then as soon as Biden came in, he became the vaccine champion.
	Oh, and his wife got COVID, huh?
	She's a son of a gun. Oh, that Whoopi Goldberg.
	Yo, she got COVID too.
	I don't think she's got COVID. I think she's got Whoopi cough.
	She's... How could people watch that stupid crap?
	How can they be? That's America.
	Yeah, she dialed into the program.
	I saw the little clip. She dials into the program.
	She's by herself on Zoom in a room, and she's got a mask over her face.
	This is about, she's sending us a message.
	I don't think she, does she know what she's doing?
	Does anybody? Here we go.
	Catch on to this. Well, I agree with her.
	I think it's a safe thing to do.
	And don't forget, when you masturbate, don't forget to use your hand cleanser because you don't want to do anything, you know, to...
	I mean, what are you, kidding me?
	Oh, look at this stupid crap.
	Oh, by the way, you read on the box here.
	These masks do not...
	These masks do not eliminate exposure to the risk of any disease or infection.
	Right on the box. Yeah, that's for the illiterate.
	It is a marker of your IQ to wear one of those things.
	And here we go.
	This is from your Trends Journal.
	You ready? April 14th.
	2020. Remember the COVID? And I call it the COVID war because that's what the politicians called it.
	Oh, yeah. Because any time they tell you they're taken to war, the people get to fear and they follow what they're being told.
	So they called it a war.
	Trump called it a war. That clown Boris Johnson.
	One after another, they called it a war.
	All right. Taking advantage of successful fear campaigns, political leaders continue to shut down economies.
	Remember, this is April 14th, 2020.
	on their individual temperament rather than hard data.
	As of last week, over 100 countries were in full or partial lockdown, affecting billions of people.
	In Italy, where it is now known that 99% of those who have died from COVID-19 had significant health issues before contracting it, the average age of those who died is 79.5 the average age of those who died is 79.5 years of age, with over three quarters having high blood pressure and a third diabetes.
	Last Friday, Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte extended one of the most severe lockdowns in the world.
	Announcing his decision, Conte said that the lockdown was a decision, quote, for which I take all political responsibility.
	Not anymore, right?
	Now, my trend post.
	By their language, you shall know them.
	Conti's, for which I take, excludes the 60 million citizens and leaves it up to I alone.
	Yes, yes.
	I tell you what to do.
	I'll tell you what to do.
	I'm Conti.
	I think you're spelling it wrong.
	You need to throw you in that name someplace.
	Yeah. I'll tell you what to do.
	Who the hell are you?
	You're just nothing but a plantation worker on Slavelandia.
	I tell you what to do.
	And that's what happened in one country after another from a little clown jerk mayor in a city, a clown governor, a clown president.
	I'll tell you what to do.
	Oh, and we're going to bring freedom and democracy around the world.
	And that's why we're going to Ukraine to bring freedom and democracy there.
	And don't forget to stand 60 to pot.
	Because the wind blows directly in straight lines in 60.
	Doesn't go around, up or down.
	Well, you know, this week we had both the New York Times and CNN said, we've got a massive study here.
	It's got 78, I think it was 78, 70-something, random controlled trials.
	And they had done this before, but then they added another 11.
	And this is in countries around the world.
	And they said, you know, these masks don't work.
	And so, of course, common sense would tell you that they don't work.
	But they've done studies and they don't work.
	And so the New York Times printed that.
	And then you saw Mike Smirconish on CNN confronted Fauci with it.
	And he says, well, you know, that may be true for the public health, but we're talking about the individual.
	They never cared about the individual.
	I mean, you talk about what a slippery liar he is.
	He immediately pivots and said, oh, yeah, you got a study that proves that it doesn't work for the group.
	Okay, well, I wasn't talking about that.
	I was talking about the individual. You never were.
	It was always about herd immunity, and I heard that I had to wear the mask.
	I heard it from Fauci, and I heard it through the grapevine.
	It was always about herd immunity.
	70% of people get jabbed.
	You only need one jab.
	That was how they sold it, by the way.
	Yeah, that's right. 96% efficacy rate.
	Again, we wrote about this as it was happening in the Trends Journal.
	We were the first, the first to call this a fraud.
	I would cover the Trends Journal in January 28th.
	Coronavirus, 106 dead in China.
	And our next line was, 1.4 billion still alive.
	Yeah, that's right.
	The new black plague?
	Yeah. What are you telling me 106 people died for?
	Yeah. Again, this is from...
	And you've still got people like Trump and Biden still selling that lie.
	It's amazing, you know?
	Again, the people swallow...
	I go to this...
	You know, I buy all organic, you know, as much as I can.
	And I go to this health food store here, Mother Earth.
	A third of the people are wearing masks.
	Wow. Wow.
	That's crazy.
	Well, you know, it's been proven not only that they don't work, but and you know that from it's just common sense.
	As you put that mask on, there's things on either side that, you know, where it pops out.
	It's not sealed to your face.
	Number one.
	Number two, if this is some respiratory virus or something, it's going to pass right through this.
	When it comes, then they come back in their fallback position is like, oh, but it's the spittle particles that they're going to stop.
	Well, you know, they proved back in 2002 that, you know, if you have it on for 20 minutes, it's going to get saturated with moisture and you're going to put out smaller particles that are going to go further.
	All of this stuff, it doesn't even pass a sanity check.
	And here we are, you know, three and a half years later, and they're trying to bring this stuff back.
	But I think it is interesting that even CNN and New York Times are pushing back on this stuff.
	A little bit. A little bit, yeah.
	A little bit, yeah. And again, we wrote about this in the Trends Journal as it was happening with Fauci.
	He was on CBS saying earlier that you didn't need to wear a mask.
	And I forget the woman that was in one of the departments under Biden.
	She asked if she's going to be flying.
	Should she wear a mask? And he said, no, don't wear one.
	I mean, all this came out.
	Again, I want to read you.
	This is from the April 1st, April 14th, 2020 Trends Journal.
	Just some of the stuff that was going on.
	You ready? In Colombia, a citizen can leave his or her house the same number of days as the number on that person's national identity card.
	I'm not making this up.
	In Serbia, the government has banned dog walking after 5 p.m., Who you mentioned, that clown that used to be the Prime Minister of New Zealand, Arden?
	Yeah, yeah. You mentioned that before?
	Yeah. Has told all citizens to behave as if they have coronavirus, eliminating all physical contact with anyone outside the house or living space.
	As of last Saturday, four people died from the virus in a country of 4,800,000.
	In the United States, Dr.
	Anthony Fauci, the health official, the mainstream media anointed America's, quote, most trusted voice, stated last Wednesday, quote, I don't think we should shake hands ever again.
	He also recommended compulsive hand washing.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. You ready?
	Yeah. Here you go.
	Playing the war card, Governor Ned Lamont of Connecticut said, this is a war that is never won.
	It's a war that we have to figure out how to wind it down in the safest possible way.
	As of yesterday, we write, 540 residents of a population of 3.6 million people died from coronavirus, which equals 0.015%.
	In New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy said, quote, Out of that little Goldman Sachs clown's mind,
	Murphy, a little coward of nothing, you go to jail if you don't do what we tell you to do.
	Even though what we tell you to do lacks one scintilla of scientific evidence.
	And they have no legal authority for it either.
	I mean, it wasn't a law that was passed.
	It's just my dictate. And you do what I say now.
	You know, when you're talking about Fauci, I found an old video of his back to the 1980s, a very young Fauci, talking about AIDS at the time, because this is where he first started misusing the PCR test that was the basis for all this paranoia.
	And he was telling people, you've got to keep your distance from people with AIDS. You've got to social...
	You know, all the same stuff, Gerald, that he was doing...
	Back then, misusing the PCR test, telling people this is about a distance thing, telling people it's a virus, and you've got to be afraid.
	And Kerry Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for the PCR test, said, you can't prove that this is a virus from my test.
	And, you know, you're misusing this, all the rest of this stuff.
	A lot of people did not believe it was a virus.
	If it had been a virus, then all the people that they made fun of saying, well, you're going to We've got to worry about mosquitoes transferring this.
	Maybe that's a transfer vector if it's going to be in the blood.
	They didn't care about any of that stuff.
	But it's always the same game that was being played by Fauci, and he's just a master liar.
	It's just amazing. I remember when the whole AIDS scare happened.
	It was all about sperm going into the bloodstream, by the way.
	And people addicted to drugs.
	Straits weren't dying of this stuff.
	It was a total fear.
	And again, by a clown.
	An arrogant little clown.
	And by the way, this is the first book I worked on, Natural Healing.
	And I have an honorary doctorate from the National University of Health Sciences.
	Never one word, never one word in the major media to get healthy.
	And again, reading the data, who's dying from this stuff.
	According to the CDC, 61% of 1-17 year olds that were hospitalized for COVID were obese.
	Can't figure it out.
	Oh, by the way, you know, they can't, you see the numbers came out that they can't get enough people to join the military?
	Yeah. Because they're too fat to fight.
	Yeah. Oh, there's an update to that, though, too.
	They still have the selective service that you have to register for, but you cannot identify as a woman and avoid registering for the draft.
	When it comes to the draft, a man is a man, a woman is a woman.
	Oh yeah, but otherwise it's not that way anymore.
	That's right. Yeah, it truly is amazing what they've been able to pull off and to keep this going for so long.
	And yet, as you're pointing out, you know, it was people who were average age of 79, they had two and a half comorbidities and all the rest of the stuff as this was beginning.
	In Italy, we knew that.
	It kept up with that.
	But then people started dying.
	Young, healthy people, professional athletes started dying because of the jab.
	And they lie about that as intensely, if not more so, than about the virus itself.
	You know, the whole COVID thing is a lie.
	But it's that vaccine.
	Even when you've got somebody sitting there and they bring this stuff up, Trump is not going to talk about it.
	She won't hold his feet to the fire.
	Nobody's going to talk about this.
	I said, this is because they've all had a part in this, right?
	The media's had a part in it.
	All of the different governments and all the parties in the different governments, they've all been a party to this murder.
	And they don't want to say anything about it.
	Eight nabbed in Rockland County for violating social distance orders.
	Eight people have been arrested for violating the county and state social distance order amid a novel coronavirus pandemic.
	This is from the Clarkstown Daily News.
	Yep. Mm-hmm.
	Mm-hmm. Remember if your mother was dying, a friend was dying, a father was dying, you couldn't go see him in the hospital?
	Yeah. You couldn't go see him in the nursing home?
	That's right. Remember that?
	Yeah, yeah. Look, with a little bit of time left, I want to talk about the economy.
	Yes, I do. You talk about what's going on in Germany.
	China, I used to say that the 21st century is going to be the Chinese century because the business of China is business and the business of America is war.
	China killed itself with launching the COVID war in 2020 on Chinese Lunar New Year, the year of the rat.
	And their three years of zero COVID policy.
	They destroyed their economy.
	Hundreds of millions of people have lost their lives and livelihoods.
	Now, you've got to understand, I was talking earlier about how when they came into the World Trade Organization, from 1970 to 2001, their GDP is like that, and then it skyrocketed when they came into the WTO. Like every boom, they overbuilt.
	It happens all the time.
	And now the overbuilding bust has been worsened because of the lockdowns.
	So now you're looking at China's exports going way down.
	But you're also looking at their imports going way down.
	So that means all the countries that were exporting products like Germany and Europe into China, their business is going way down.
	There's a global recession going on in front of our eyes.
	Now, in a couple of weeks, the Federal Reserve and the ECB are going to be meeting again whether or not to raise interest rates.
	Even if they hold interest rates where they are, it's still gonna go down.
	If they raise interest rates, it's gonna become a lot worse.
	Gold prices are not going to go up until interest rates go down in the United States.
	And in the Trends Journal we're forecasting, they're going to lower interest rates Boys and girls, in the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, they do it all the time.
	To keep the party in power in power.
	Because the Federal Reserve is running our government.
	Our Treasury Secretary is Janet Yellen, who was the former head of the Federal Reserve.
	The former head of the Federal Reserve is our Treasury Secretary.
	You got it. They run the government.
	Yes. So they're going to do everything they can to keep the people in power in power.
	So they're going to lower interest rates with forecasting.
	And we're going to continue to see the markets decline in September is our forecast too.
	Yeah, and of course, that appears to be several people.
	You're there early on that.
	You keep seeing the mainstream media talking about how, look, it's so surprising.
	Everybody else is going down, but our market is going up.
	But Michael Burry, who did the big short fame, and Buffett have done big shorts on this particular market.
	So you think it's going to be a big correction in September, October time frame?
	Yep, that's who we've been saying this now for, what, five months.
	Yeah, yeah. And we also said last November that the markets would go up.
	The S&P 500 would go up at least 16%.
	And it went up over 17%.
	Because, again, we look at the data.
	Following the last 40 midterm elections in the United States, the S&P 500 has gone up 16.3%.
	So we said, yeah, it's going to keep going up, but then it's going to go down.
	So the phony lift is going to end.
	And again, a lot of it was pushed up because of the AI. And this AI is real.
	Again, you go back to your Trends Journal when it was a small newsletter.
	This is 1999, October.
	Dot-com this.
	We said the dot-com market would bust by the second quarter of 2000.
	Dot-com overload will short-circuit many high expectations for huge profits in internet commerce, entertainment, and a wide array of dot-com services.
	Following the holiday season, many of today's high-flying internet stocks, the hottest IPOs, newly emerging IPO wannabes will have begun their rapid descent from their overvalued heights.
	We said it would crash by the second quarter of 2000 and it crashed in March.
	The AI is different.
	Trends are born, they grow, they mature, reach old age, and die.
	This AI is real.
	The reason we call the dot-com bus, they were making up stuff back then.
	It made no sense. The whole internet revolution just began six years earlier.
	And so they were just making up stuff.
	This AI is real.
	It's real. Well, they certainly do have real uses for it in terms of surveilling us and controlling us and censoring us.
	I mean, that is the government's authoritarian urges alone could make this thing a big financial boon for these companies because it is going to be used in a massive way for censorship.
	Thank you so much. It's always a joy to talk to you and always ahead of the curve.
	Gerald Salenti at TrendsJournal.com.
	And again, if you use the code NIGHT, you can save 10% off of a subscription to Trends Journal.
	Thank you so much, Gerald. Appreciate it.
	Thank you. Thank you for all of you, too.
	I appreciate being on. Thank you very much.
	All right, folks. Have a good weekend, and we'll see you on Monday, which is September 11th.
	And we've got a special guest on that day.
	We'll see you on Monday. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part.
	And try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲