Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 5, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:00:51

The David Knight Show - 09/05/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 5th of September, in the year of our Lord, 2023.
	It's been good to be off a little bit, but we're going to be back today with a lot of important news.
	DARPA has come out of the box.
	Special Forces at War with us on social media.
	We're going to talk about Joe Biggs and the January 6th sentencings that are happening.
	And especially what is going on with Fauci and the reinvention of Donald Trump as a do-not-comply guy.
	But we're also going to take a look at what is happening in Hollywood as a new Emma Stone film shows us their real pedophile fantasy.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	And then yesterday we had some rebroadcasts, but I did not comment really on this much at all.
	I can't remember if I got on social media much this weekend.
	I think I did something yesterday, but for the most part, I just need to get away from the media for a while.
	But I did see on Thursday, as the show was ending, the sentence to Joe Biggs, and I want to start with that today.
	Truly outrageous.
	And 17 years in prison, he's already been in jail for a couple of years, tortured while there, as the other January 6th prisoners are as well.
	They gave an enhancement of terrorism, saying that he had pushed over a fence.
	And they call that terrorism.
	Let me tell you what terrorism is.
	Giving somebody a 17-year sentence for showing up to protest an election.
	Giving people years in prison for walking into their precious space when the doors were open and the police guards said, come on in.
	Yeah, the restroom's right over there.
	Sure, you want to use that? That's right over there.
	And they've got people in their 70s now looking at 5, 10 years in prison for that.
	That's terrorism. Terrorism of that sort is intimidating people Coercing, punishing people, and, of course, terrorizing them in prison as well, torturing them.
	That is political terrorism.
	Doing that for their political goals.
	That's what this is about.
	Everybody is so focused on Trump, and Trump could not care less about these people.
	I noticed on Friday that he had gone on a 3 a.m.
	rant about how he, how Trump, was being persecuted by him.
	He doesn't even care about these people getting decades in prison.
	Elderly people getting life sentences for walking into the Capitol building when he was pushing and provoking them, bringing them in.
	He doesn't care about anybody but himself.
	He didn't care about Julian Assange.
	He didn't care about any of the January Sixers either.
	He had two weeks to pardon them, but it was all about him.
	If he had pardoned them, that might have given him some risk in his mind.
	He wasn't going to do anything about it.
	Now, Julie Kelly, who was covering the sentencing hearings and the trials, she said, obviously, I have a lot to report on what just happened in the Proud Boys sentencing, but I'm still in shock.
	After hearing an assistant U.S. attorney straining to compare shaking part of a metal fence to a mass causality event, a casualty event, I think she means to say, to justify terrorism enhancement.
	And then she has a clip of the offense shaking.
	And immediately you have people jump on.
	I looked at the comments as the sentences were talked about on conservative media.
	And I saw the, you know, leftists say, oh, that's good.
	You know, just string them up.
	We don't care what happens.
	The conservative media was all about, but Ray Epps, Ray Epps, Ray Epps.
	Really? Yeah.
	Ray Epps tore the fence down.
	No, look at that picture.
	And you see people up there at the fence and the guy that, you know, is up there shaking the fence comes back and Ray Epps shakes his head no and whispers something into his ear.
	And the guy goes back and pushes the fence and part of that.
	The guy initially said Ray Epps did not, told him, don't do that.
	Then he said that under oath.
	Then later he said, no, he told me to take the fence.
	And when he was talking to conservative radio, Trump radio, But that's not under oath.
	So the question is, and they're still sentencing people.
	They just sentencing, not sentencing, charging people.
	They just charged a guy who's 22 years old for walking into their precious building.
	I wouldn't bother to even go to the Capitol building.
	That's what I think of this occupying government here.
	I'm not even curious as to what this whole charade looks like on their daily business.
	But a 22-year-old, he was charged now.
	Here we are, two and a half years later.
	He was charged and committed suicide.
	They're still charging people with this stuff.
	So don't play that game, right?
	It wasn't Ray Epps who made millions of dollars by sending people there.
	It was Trump and Alex and people like that.
	Their Stop the Steal, their Save America grift.
	They were the ones who got people there on January 6th.
	I was telling people from when I was at Infowars, don't listen to Alex, it's a grift.
	I warned people up to the very day of it, and I wish I could have spoken to Biggs, but I don't think he would have listened.
	I know exactly that he would not have listened.
	And he still doesn't understand what's going on.
	He called in on Saturday to talk to Alex from prison.
	And he thinks that if Trump gets elected, that's his only chance, is Trump getting elected.
	When he was at the sentencing hearing, obviously distraught and said, I don't care about left and right anymore.
	I don't want to be a member of the Proud Boys anymore.
	I just want to be a member of the PTA and have a life with my daughter.
	But then he goes on with Alex and is back to the usual stuff.
	I don't get it, frankly.
	If Trump was going to pardon him, why don't you think he would have done it to start with?
	He didn't care about any of these people.
	He still doesn't care about any of them.
	He wouldn't pardon Julian Assange.
	He was pardoning Jared Kushner's criminal friends, the biggest white-collar criminals in history.
	And Trump was pardoning them.
	Check the money flow on that.
	Forget about his hookers.
	Look at the money flow from the pardons to Jared Kushner.
	Look at the money flow to Jared Kushner from the Saudis and so on.
	That's the big bucks.
	They don't want to look at that.
	But he was focused on pardoning these criminals.
	Didn't care about Julian Assange, who helped him get into office by telling the truth about Hillary Clinton.
	All you have to do is tell the truth about these people.
	But evidently, the truth about Trump is not good enough.
	They've got to fabricate some lies to come after him because the truth points to them as well.
	They're guilty of the same crimes.
	They ought to go to jail for the same crimes that Trump should go to jail for.
	So they invent some new stuff on the side.
	And that helps to fan the flames of civil war.
	So one person...
	Whose tweet is pulled out here by Information Liberation says, without a press cheering it on and a silent GOP establishment, this couldn't happen in America.
	GOP establishment?
	Is Trump now part of the GOP establishment?
	Trump doesn't have anything to say about this.
	He doesn't care about this stuff.
	There's, you know, again, 3 a.m.
	rant about himself. He doesn't care about Joe Biggs.
	He doesn't care about Proud Boys.
	He doesn't care about anybody that was caught up in this January the 6th grift.
	Come to Washington, January the 6th.
	For what? What was the purpose of that?
	What did they think they were going to change?
	There was absolutely nothing that could have been done.
	It was completely a setup.
	And now they pretend, oh, well, you know, this is rigged from the very beginning.
	Zachary Rail, given 15 years in prison as well on Thursday.
	And since then, another one has been sentenced to 18 years.
	Joe Biggs, two Purple Hearts, Serving in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
	Joe has just been so used by this government his entire life.
	He's idealistic.
	He trusted the government's narrative initially.
	Eventually came around to figure out the truth about the Iraq War, about 9-11, and the rest of this stuff.
	But he's trying to do the right thing.
	Trying to do the right thing and following Trump.
	Just amazing. More than a lot of murderers get, 17 years.
	And again, when it's reported, Zero Hedge says, which reminds us that instigator Ray Epps, who's totally not a Fed, remains free to this day.
	Again, if that's sure, you know, somebody not being indicted?
	Did Ray Epps make millions of dollars on this?
	Tens of millions? Hundreds of millions like Trump did?
	Tens of millions like Alex?
	Hundreds of millions like Trump?
	If that's your yardstick there, then why aren't those guys being called feds?
	They're using Ray Epps and other people like him to cover up what they did to people and get them on the phone and say, yeah, I'm on your side.
	If not being charged means that you are a fed, you know, if saying to people, let's go, let's go over there, If that means that you're a Fed, then are they Feds?
	Was Trump in on all this stuff?
	Was Alex? I mean, seriously, why aren't they charged with this stuff?
	Norm Pattis, the defendants are not terrorists.
	He's the lawyer for, at one time, Joe Biggs.
	I don't know if he was Joe Biggs' lawyer at this point in time.
	He said, whatever excesses of zeal they demonstrated on January the 6th, no matter how grave the potential interference with the orderly transfer of power, a decade or more behind bars is excessive punishment.
	He is absolutely right.
	And, of course, Norm Pattis points a finger at Trump as well.
	Look, in terms of pardons, you're not going to get a pardon from Pence if he were to win, but he doesn't have a chance.
	You're not going to get a pardon from Nikki Haley.
	She doesn't have a chance either.
	But I'm not so sure about Trump since he didn't do the right thing the first time around.
	You know, you've got other people like DeSantis and Ramaswamy said, yeah, I would pardon them.
	But with Trump there, I don't think Trump's going to win a general election.
	And, you know, he's likely to be the nominee.
	Again, big saying, he's done with the left and right.
	He doesn't want to be a member of the Proud Boys.
	He just wants to do the PTA. And when he went on, he said, asked viewers to donate to help his family.
	He said his military pension has been revoked.
	Two Purple Hearts, they revoked his pension because he pushed on a fence, that type of thing.
	Look, as I said before, if somebody breaks and enters, if somebody gets violent with a cop, that'll be punishment.
	But these punishments are excessive.
	Like I said before, more than people see for murder.
	And they're being tortured while they're there as well.
	Again, he says, I hope Trump wins because I know he'll pardon me.
	I believe that with all my heart.
	Joe, you gotta wake up.
	This country of people got to wake up.
	And then Alex says, they set us all up on January.
	Alex was set up.
	Alex didn't know. Who picked the date, Alex?
	January the 6th. Did you pick it?
	Did Trump pick it? Some people coordinating between you guys pick it?
	Where did that date come up with?
	How were you? Why were you collecting money?
	What were you going to do to fix the election?
	Trump collected money saying he's going to pay the lawyers, but he kept all the money himself and he didn't pay the lawyers anything.
	The first $8,000 he got from anybody, he kept.
	Split it with the RNC. The GOP establishment.
	So what were you going to do with the money, Alex?
	You know, what were you going to do with the January 6th crowd to stop this and to fix it, right?
	They ran the election according to the rules that Trump put in place that are still in place.
	Even without a lockdown.
	Still have the mail-out ballot stuff, vote-by-mail stuff.
	That's Trump's legacy of corruption in the elections.
	The elections were held by his rules and he cries foul.
	And that's why I cried about Trump right after the election.
	You're selling people this false hope.
	Steve Pachenik on Infowars two days afterwards saying, we know exactly what's going on.
	Trump put out blockchain watermark ballots.
	They got quantum computing, calculating all this stuff.
	We got 20,000 National Guard out there arresting people right now.
	Oh, great. Millions of views.
	Rush Limbaugh talking about it.
	He had Clarence Thomas' wife texting Mark Meadows.
	I hope this is true. It couldn't possibly be true.
	It was so patently absurd.
	Yeah, he says, John says, you were all patsies that day, Joe.
	That's right. He was your patsy, Alex.
	A lot of people. A lot of people were your patsies.
	A lot of people were Trump's patsies.
	A lot of media, they were patsies of the right-wing media that pushed all this election garbage.
	Again, how many times have they been given opportunities to make their case and they don't do it?
	And I use the same yardstick on these Trump people about their election stuff that I use against Michael Mann, who tried to cover up all the data today.
	About his hockey stick stuff.
	You don't want to talk about the data?
	You don't want to show the data? Then you're lying.
	It's just that simple.
	Is there corruption in the elections?
	Every single one of them.
	Did it get worse in 2020?
	Yes. Because of Trump's new rules, it got worse.
	Trump hasn't said whether he'll consider pardons for the Proud Boys specifically.
	He said he'd consider pardoning a large portion of them.
	What does that mean? Did he consider it when he didn't do it?
	When he was still president for two weeks?
	Perhaps. So, Theriault gets sentenced today.
	Nordeen got 18 years, as I pointed out.
	So, 15 years, 17 years, 18 years, these guys have gotten so far.
	The 22-year-old person, Meacham, died August 28, two weeks after the Biden regime charged him with four misdemeanor crimes for walking inside the open doors.
	And so, the Gateway Pundit thinks it's possibly suicide, but we don't know.
	But the key thing that we do know is that the government, two and a half years later, is still charging more and more and more people.
	We do know that Bank of America...
	Supposedly voluntarily turned over information from everybody who had a financial transaction through them anywhere around the capital, even going into Maryland and Virginia on that day.
	And more information about people who were there and who had also bought guns using their credit card.
	The Bank of America has gone full Stasi.
	The Bank of Stasi America.
	Roxanne, Mary Ella Moore, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. We're going to take a quick break here.
	I'm going to try to calm down, and we'll be right back.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	The David Knight Show dot com.
	Thank you.
	Rock fan, Audi MRR, Modern Retro Radio.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, good morning all.
	Can't stay in the chat this morning.
	Work stuff. Almighty's blessings to his true followers.
	Well, thank you. Appreciate that.
	And we do have a lot to talk about today from that standpoint.
	I mean, this new movie that's come out with Emma Stone in it, what a piece of perverted filth it is.
	And we're going to talk about that.
	And there's some revelations about Andrew Tate.
	And then you have Oliver Anthony went on with Joe Rogan.
	And they talked porn and alcohol and SSRI drugs to our program.
	So I haven't gotten the transcript of it.
	I don't know if I can find where the transcript of it is.
	I don't know if he posts his stuff up after the fact.
	The entire thing are just clips from it.
	I've just seen some clips, and I've got a couple, or one I want to play for you.
	So we're going to talk about that as well as this pastor in Canada, Stevenson, who was arrested.
	His family there, in front of his family, little children pleading for him.
	You know, God works in mysterious ways, doesn't he?
	His church has exploded in terms of size.
	Because people see somebody with integrity and conviction.
	And they're hungry for that.
	Really hungry for that.
	And he's having some legal battles.
	Not exactly the one that he wanted.
	We'll talk about, you know, he won on a technicality because the government wants to keep the principle where they can shut people down and where they can overrule Canada's Charter of Rights for expedience.
	Well, if you do that, you don't have a charter, do you?
	Yeah, if you can say, well, this is not expedient for us, so we're just going to wipe this away.
	So we're going to talk about that.
	As well as DARPA and the special forces at war with people.
	They're now teaming up to use artificial intelligence to listen to gamer conversations in real time.
	And it's beyond using AI. This is beyond just looking for keywords.
	It's determining what your motivations are.
	This is what the future is going to look like.
	And if they are rolling this out as a test case on these game platforms, it won't be long before they do it on podcasts.
	I'm not hiding anything.
	I'm not trying to use any euphemisms.
	People would stay on YouTube by saying, they talk about the vaccine and say, you know, the thing, the thing, you know, the thing.
	I don't play those games.
	I call it what it is, poison.
	I call it democide, death by government.
	But let's talk first about the masks.
	A lot of talk about this, and on Friday I got an email from Handy, who now has this substack as well.
	He says, sorry to send this to you on your day off, but I need a document in real time.
	In the past, I've been careful to redact identifying information.
	This time, I can call the tyrants out by name.
	This is fact.com.
	Not opinion, he writes.
	I'm currently at one of the Emory hospitals here in Atlanta.
	I was just told by one of the hospital registration employees that there is now a patient and employee mask mandate in the ER and some other unspecified areas of the hospital.
	The last time they did it the same way.
	They mandated patients and employees first.
	Then they demanded EMS personnel mask up as well.
	This is the same hospital system that called security and had me escorted from the building in front of my patient once before for refusing to put on a face diaper.
	And so he says, Emory, by the way, kept their mask mandates the longest.
	I believe they were one of the first to mandate in 2020.
	And they didn't lift that mandate until late spring of this year.
	I will not comply. Again, for anyone out there who happens to witness their EMS worker get escorted from the hospital by security for mask mandate violations, they're trying to stand up for your God-given right to breathe clean, fresh air.
	Sadly, I believe even fewer EMS workers will rebel this time around.
	The general attitude I see with my co-workers is don't be the tall nail.
	The tall nail that gets hammered down.
	Yeah, that is such a sad attitude.
	I remember about 30 years ago, we had some, no, about 20 years ago, we had some friends who, she grew up in Japan, and she said the attitude there with the Japanese people is everybody wants to conform.
	Don't be the tall nail.
	Everybody stay, keep your head down.
	I thought, wow, that's really sad.
	But that's what has now become here in America as well.
	We owe that to Trump and his team for bringing that to America.
	Of course, it was always our choice to comply or not comply.
	We found out what the vast majority of Americans were made of in 2020.
	Interesting coincidence, he said, Emory Hospital's main campus is just a couple blocks from the CDC here in Atlanta, and that's where they had us transport that Ebola patient to Back when that was in the news cycle.
	Remember that? We've talked about that many times.
	You've got the Ebola patient.
	He's an illegal immigrant.
	Came in, sick.
	And it was in Dallas.
	He had that same guy, the top elected official in Dallas.
	They call him the county judge, Clay Jenkins.
	And he was going around doing everything but licking the walls and saying, See, it's not a problem.
	This is great. You know, it's Ebola.
	You die from hemorrhages through your eyes and everything else, right?
	But he transported the family around, and everybody said, no, it's not a problem.
	He died. He died.
	Two nurses got infected.
	They nearly died, but they didn't die.
	But Clay Jenkins was saying, hey, we've got a football game coming up.
	Houston versus Dallas.
	Go to it. He says, we've got hundreds of, or thousands of doctors and nurses.
	You'll be fine. You know, you get sick, we'll take care of it.
	That wasn't what he said before anybody died of COVID. COVID isn't anything like Ebola.
	As a matter of fact, it wasn't serious at all.
	Even if they tried to make it in a laboratory.
	It was a vaccine that did it.
	But when that came around, it was Clay Jenkins who shut down the business of that single mom.
	She had a beauty parlor or a nail salon or something like that.
	Trying to support her family.
	He shut that down. Tried to get her thrown in jail.
	Tried to get a big fine against her.
	But, you know, Ebola comes down.
	Oh, that's fine. So he says, I'm sure that it's just a coincidence that the most tyrannical hospital system in Atlanta and the CDC have such a close working relationship.
	I'm sure that it's nothing at all.
	Yeah, that's right. Nursing homes are now being told that they need to mask up.
	We've got Fear reports coming out of the same places, interestingly enough, in New Jersey and New York.
	What are the chances that, after everything disappears, that some variant would appear in exactly the same counties where the nursing home problems were there before?
	Is it a virus, or is it the public health officials that are there?
	It's the public health officials who are the virus.
	And we need to clean them out.
	So nursing homes have to boost their staff with new national standards.
	And how is this going to be enforced by the Biden administration?
	Well, they're going to do it through Medicare and Medicaid, through CMS, the same thing that they used to reward people for doing what Trump told them to do.
	You label somebody as COVID, just, you know, clinical diagnosis.
	You don't have to have a test. Just point the finger and say, you've got COVID, right?
	And we'll send you $13,000.
	You put them on a ventilator, we'll give you $39,000.
	And then after you've labeled them as COVID, we'll give you a 20% bonus on everything.
	That was all run through CMS. The American Hospital Association complained in August that they were not getting their 20% bonus in some of the cases because they were now saying, you have to show us your test.
	And they said, well, you told us to do this at the beginning, and you said the test didn't work.
	And you said you don't have enough of them anyway.
	And now you're not going to pay up?
	The CMS and the federal government under Trump works the same way as it does under Biden.
	This is the way they do everything. They bribe and blackmail.
	Give you carrots and sticks with the money.
	And that's what they're doing now in terms of minimum staffing levels for these nursing homes before they get the money.
	Now, that's not a problem.
	I would favor that.
	I mean, I don't favor the welfare state.
	But, you know, if you've got Medicare and Medicaid and you're paying people in the nursing homes, they should have some minimum staffing level.
	What they're saying is staffing levels are too high to comply with.
	But the principle is the same.
	If they're going to reward them for identifying people as COVID patients, financially bribing them for medical malpractice, Will they then remove their CMS funding if they don't do masks, if they don't do vaccines in the nursing homes?
	They're escalating that.
	This is a massive program to kill people.
	And so as the mask stuff comes back, even Michael Smirconish at CNN is challenging Fauci.
	And this is kind of interesting to watch this happen.
	Here is Fauci in the exchange where he's challenged on, well, yeah, we've got to bring back the mask.
	It's a prudent thing to do.
	And this guy calls him on it.
	He says, we've got to study.
	And it's a big study.
	I'll tell you the details of the study after the clip.
	But it's amazing.
	Listen to how slippery Fauci is.
	This guy doesn't skip a beat.
	And he pivots and he says, well, maybe that's true when you're looking at a lot of people.
	But we're talking about the individual.
	It's like, wait a minute.
	This is always about public health over the individual's health.
	This is why I've talked about this in the very beginning.
	I said, you can't have public health if you ignore the health of the individuals there.
	And if you're going to look at the efficacy of your public health policies, you would want to look at a large population.
	But Fauci doesn't care.
	This guy is a bold-faced liar.
	Just as Kerry Mullins, who invented the PCR, he says, he'll look straight in the camera and lie to your face.
	I've challenged him for debates.
	He can't use my PCR tests the way he's using them for HIV and AIDS. And, of course, they ran that same scam again.
	And did it a couple of months after Carrie died.
	The guy who won the Nobel Prize for the PCR test.
	Here's a clip. I would hope that if, in fact, we get to the point where the volume of cases is such and organizations like the CDC recommend...
	CDC doesn't mandate anything.
	I mean, recommendations... Yeah, right. Hear that?
	That people wear masks.
	I would hope that they abide by the recommendation and take into account the risk to themselves and to their families.
	And again, we're not talking about forcing anybody to do anything.
	Totally understood. There is a perception out there by many, how many I don't know, that they don't work and that the data concludes that they didn't work in the first go-round.
	Respond to that on masks.
	Yeah, well, that's not so.
	I mean, when you're talking about at the population level, that the data are less strong than knowing that if you look on a situation as an individual protecting themselves or protecting them from spreading it, there's no doubt that masks work.
	Different studies give different percentages of advantage of wearing it, but there's no doubt that the weight of the studies indicate the benefit of wearing masks.
	I'm going to refer to one of them.
	You've heard about it before.
	I heard about it from a number of radio callers.
	Brett Stevens in The Times talked about Cochran.
	Put that on the screen.
	The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illness, including COVID-19, was published last month in the New York Times.
	Its conclusions, said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist, who is the lead author, were unambiguous.
	There is just no evidence that they, masks, make any difference, he told the journalist Mayenne Demasi.
	Full stop. But wait, hold on.
	What about the N95 masks as opposed to the lower quality?
	Surgical or cloth masks makes no difference.
	None of it, he said. Well, what about the studies that initially persuaded policymakers to impose mask mandates?
	They were convinced by non-randomized studies, flawed observational studies.
	How do we get beyond that finding of that particular review?
	Yeah, but there are other studies, Michael, that show at an individual level for individual, when you're talking about the effect on the epidemic or the pandemic as a whole, the data are less strong.
	But when you talk about as an individual basis of someone protecting themselves or protecting themselves from spreading it to others, there's no doubt that there are many studies that show that there is an advantage.
	When you took it, the broad population...
	Bull-faced liar. Bull-faced liar.
	Now, these were told, you know, we're told, and you know how people have reacted to you when you didn't wear the mask.
	You're going to kill us.
	Your kids need to be taken away from you.
	You're a threat. You had, at the very beginning of it, you had Scott Adams writes the Dilbert cartoon.
	It's getting harder and harder to tell these freedom lovers from sociopaths.
	You were a sociopath if you didn't do this.
	Well, if it was about individual health, why can't we make those determinations?
	Oh, no, it was about public health, so you don't get to make those determinations.
	We didn't mandate anything, he said.
	Coercion is not a choice.
	Coercion was mandate.
	No jab, no job.
	Don't wear the mask.
	Don't even ask to be seated at a table.
	That type of thing. And where did this mostly happen?
	It mostly happened in private businesses.
	They were the ones who gave them this very thin veneer.
	So thin that we can all clearly see through it.
	This very thin veneer of plausible deniability.
	As I said before, this is where we are right now.
	And these people are all saying, Fauci as well as Trump, you know, I didn't do it.
	I didn't do it!
	It wasn't me, right?
	It was those people below me.
	They've taken, just as they turn the Constitution upside down and inside out, just as they turn every law and every principle that organized our country upside down and inside out, they've done the same thing with the Nuremberg excuse.
	It's not, I was just following orders from the people low down.
	I just do whatever they tell me.
	I don't think about it. I don't worry about the moral or legal implications.
	I just follow the orders, right?
	Now they're saying, I didn't order anybody.
	Where'd they get this idea, Fauci?
	Trump? Where'd they get that idea?
	So again, you heard him say, this is CNN and the New York Times coming out against Fauci.
	Flawed observational studies, said Tom Jefferson at Oxford, who put together this stuff.
	That's too charitable, quite frankly.
	They knew. They knew.
	As a matter of fact, for years I talked about this.
	It's been a while since I talked about it.
	I think the year was 2002, but I remember that it was New South Wales.
	And I remember that it was the same doctor who discovered, she said, the parvovirus for dogs.
	But she did a study about masks, and she said, well, they're completely ineffective after 20 minutes.
	And she said, at that point in time, you get so much saliva saturation on these masks that the pressure of your breath is pushing these particles out, and you get smaller particles that travel farther and remain airborne longer.
	So you're actually exacerbating the spread of this, if you've got it.
	And of course, the masks themselves...
	You know, that's what it's supposed to stop.
	Everybody knows that if you, according to the virus theory, it's so small that to say that you're going to stop it with any of these masks, including an N95, is absurd.
	It's like saying I'm going to stop mosquitoes by putting up a chain-link fence.
	So it's not going to stop the airborne particles.
	They say, well, this is to stop the viral particles that are mixed in with your saliva.
	But she said after 20 minutes, that doesn't help.
	And then we had the German study that was done after all this madness began.
	And it looked at what it does to you as an individual.
	And the fact that when you breathe out, that's one of the ways that your body eliminates waste.
	And so what you were actually doing is inhaling back in your wastes.
	And so they noticed a big uptick.
	And disease for people who are wearing the mask.
	And it's on their face.
	You can see the mask, the pimples on the people's face that have to wear it all day in some of these jobs.
	And it was never allowed by OSHA. They said if you're working in a really dusty environment where you've got big dust particles and those masks can actually help, you can't wear it for more than 20 minutes because people are going to be able to take that off, give them a break, let them take the mask off, let them breathe some air.
	No, they're not going to do that anymore.
	They're going to have you wear that thing all day.
	Breathing back in your waste, your disease, bringing it deeper in.
	And that's what he found out, was that any bacteriological things, it just takes it back down deeper.
	Kind of the same type of stuff they were doing with the ventilator, right?
	You know, giving people bacterial infections.
	This is a filthy, stupid lie, these masks are.
	And Fauci is a filthy, stupid liar.
	He's pushed this. He continues to push it.
	He continues to reposition himself of a new lie every day in response to this.
	On Rumble, Tyrannosaurus Radio.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	It says, there is an Ebola outbreak at Burning Man right now, apparently.
	I saw that as a rumor.
	I think the best description of what's going on is Sodom and Gomorrah.
	And they're stuck in the miry clay.
	Go back to Psalm 40.
	These people, it is this nonstop orgy of drugs and sex and basically they do stupid stuff.
	You wind up with stupid consequences.
	Who knows what they've got? Probably Ebola is the least of their worries of the kind of sexual disease transmissions that I've got there and the drugs and the occult stuff and everything else.
	On Rockfan, Angus Mustang.
	Lots of sheeple wearing masks on the plane today, giving me flashbacks to 2020.
	Yeah, yeah. Zoxovazozon.
	That's my guess as to how you might pronounce that on Rockfin.
	The people that stayed on YouTube and played those games brainwashed themselves for that access, and some paid a high price for it.
	Well, you know, that's the whole thing, is we don't want to live by lies, right?
	Yeah, that's the tyrant's game.
	You know, you've got to say that 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	You've got to pull that back and not go down that path.
	So anyway, we've known that for quite some time.
	We've known that it's bad for the user to have a mask on.
	This is one of the things in this study.
	They said, well, you know, we have now definitively proven with these studies that they absolutely do not work.
	But they said studies need to be done to look at the harm that they do.
	That's the other part of that study.
	Rand Paul never misses a chance to criticize Fauci.
	Good. I just wish that Rand Paul would criticize pharmaceutical people, that he would give people the truth about this vaccine and all the rest of this stuff.
	And about Gilead and Remdesivir that his wife bought stock in.
	He says, Fauci admits that masks don't work for the public at large, but still absurdly claims that masks work on an individual basis.
	More subterfuge.
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	Switch it to suit yourself.
	And... Yeah, until now, they've always disregarded individual health.
	And I talked about it. So you cannot have public health if you disregard individual health.
	And so now he's saying, yeah, but, you know, it's individual health.
	That's what this is about. Well, then I get to make my individual choice.
	All of your mandates and your quote-unquote recommendations and the penalties that came with it, you know, all of that stuff was based on the fact that, well, you don't get to decide about this because this affects all of us.
	So it's not your body, your choice, that they always talk about.
	We're going to tell you what to do.
	So the study says antiviral drugs and vaccines may be insufficient to prevent the spread of these severe acute respiratory syndromes, SARS, that type of thing.
	And they said this is an update of a Cochrane review last published in 2020.
	They knew this in 2020.
	But what they've done is they've now added another 11 randomized control trials.
	And so that brings the total up to 78.
	Now, I don't know how many of these things they had in 2020, but they published it in 2020, and they said this stuff doesn't work.
	We've known this for a very, very long time.
	We knew it even before it was, but common sense would tell you that, again, airborne particles, you're not going to stop them.
	You're not going to stop them from coming out around the sides.
	I used to, I had pinned for months at the top of my Twitter feed a picture of somebody blowing smoke with a mask on, and it came out at the sides and top, through it, all the rest of it, right?
	And that's exactly what Fauci was doing.
	He was blowing smoke at all of us.
	And Trump as well.
	And so they have now 78 random controlled trials.
	They've added another 11 recently.
	It said two from Mexico, one from Denmark, Bangladesh, England, Norway, etc., etc.
	This is all over the world.
	People have been studying this. We have the data.
	Fauci doesn't care about data.
	He's not doing science.
	Science is based on data.
	Science is based on experiments.
	Science is based on random control trials and other things like that.
	No, he wants this to be his pronouncements, his opinions, because he is science.
	So they said the risk of bias for these random control trials was mostly high or unclear.
	Medical surgical masks compared to no masks.
	We included 12 trials that looked at this.
	Wearing masks, the conclusion says, in the community, makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness.
	And we have a 95% confidence interval on that based on looking at these trials.
	So explain that to us, Fauci, will you please?
	Come up with some plausible lie, at least.
	These new 11 trials that they added to the existing 67, these new 11, just those 11, had 34,503 participants.
	Pretty broad.
	They said there was no clear difference between the use of medical surgical masks compared with N95 respirators and healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection.
	And they said, but then what we found out was the harms, the harms caused by these masks has not been investigated sufficiently.
	It's been under investigated.
	So that's the reality of where we are.
	And yet, You know, he says you've got to wear him anyway.
	And remember that, you know, Trump really wanted Fauci's approval with all this stuff.
	So I played for you on Thursday.
	This is from the Trump 2020 campaign, talking about how he was Fauci's little sidekick.
	The president has listened to what I have said and what the other people on the task force have said.
	The first and only time that I went in and said we should do mitigation strongly, the response was yes, we'll do it.
	When he suggests, why don't we do this?
	And I say, no, that's really not a good idea from a scientific standpoint.
	He has never overruled me.
	The travel was another recommendation.
	When we went in and said, we probably should be doing that.
	And the answer was yes.
	When I've made recommendations, he's taken them.
	And then another time was we should do it with Europe.
	And the answer was yes.
	He's never countered or overridden me.
	And the next time we should do it with the UK. And the answer was yes.
	I never...
	Trump was his yes man.
	...that I've done that, where I said, for scientific reasons, we really should do this, that he hasn't said, let's do it.
	The first and only time that Dr.
	Birx and I went in and formally made a recommendation to the president to actually have a, quote, shut down.
	The president listened to the recommendation and went to the mitigation.
	Yeah, vote for Trump.
	Vote for Pence. Yeah.
	I look at that. The thing that astonished me the most about that was not that Trump was a yes man.
	Not that he was a flunky.
	Not that he was, you know, Abbott to Fauci's Costello.
	Yeah. Oh, you know.
	HCQ. I heard that's really good.
	And maybe we can inject sunlight into veins.
	Maybe that would do it as well.
	Oh, come on, says Fauci.
	You don't know what you're talking about.
	I'm the science guy here.
	You just say yes when I talk to you, okay?
	Publicly did that.
	And Trump single-handedly discredited HCQ and ivermectin, as we talked about last week.
	You know, people saying, hey, we were using this stuff and it's very effective.
	Then Trump came out and endorsed it.
	And then Fauci You know, used him as a court jester for President Fauci.
	That's what Trump was, a court jester for him.
	Yes, man. And then at that point, it was full-on war against ivermectin and HCQ. And Trump put that clip together, talking about how he was Fauci's yes-man, Fauci's court jester.
	I did everything Fauci told me to do.
	And then at the end, his last day in office, he gives Fauci and Birx an Operation Warp Speed Medal, a special medal of commendation for its excellent work done.
	Trump's voters wanted him to fire him.
	But you know, I saw stuff like that.
	It's one of the reasons why I told people, I'm not voting for Trump.
	You need to understand which side, at least with Biden, you know who he's playing for.
	Trump is a fifth column backstabbing Benedict Donald.
	As recently as this May, Fauci said unvaccinated children should still mask up when playing with their friends.
	This May. This May.
	But this study, before they added these 11 random controlled trials, when they only had 67 of them, they put this out from the Cochran Library.
	They said wearing masks is pointless.
	There's still no evidence that masks are effective during a pandemic, said Tom Jefferson, at that point in time in February.
	But then you have three months later, Fauci's still saying, yeah, you've got to wear them in the playground, all this stuff.
	At least they're not telling people wear two or three masks at a time.
	What ridiculous nonsense.
	There's no evidence that they make any difference.
	Full stop. You heard that quote that was read to Fauci by Michael Smirconish.
	When you're talking about the effect on the epidemic or the pandemic as a whole, Fauci said, well, the data's less strong there.
	Less strong. No, it's been misproven.
	Strong data says that they don't work.
	35,000 plus people in just the recent 11 random controlled trials says they don't work.
	So what's still a question in their mind is the harm that's done to the aware.
	That's the only question that hasn't been studied sufficiently.
	But there's other studies, Michael, that show the individual level.
	You know, for these individuals, it might be protective.
	No, not at all. Zero.
	Zip. Nada. And then we're talking about, well, then it doesn't have anything to do with the herd.
	I heard something about immunity, right?
	Herd immunity. It's something I heard from Fauci.
	You notice how they stopped talking about herd immunity?
	Fauci's not talking about herd immunity with the vaccines or the masks or any of this stuff now.
	Oh, now we're back to individual health.
	Dr. Birx is now on the other side of this.
	She's flipped 180 degrees.
	She says we don't need to mandate.
	Oh, we never mandated.
	We made recommendations.
	Yeah, I'm recommending that you don't, you know.
	It's kind of like the protection racket, you know.
	Yeah, I think you need to pay me some money so that nothing happens to your business here, right?
	It'd be a shame. It's a beautiful place.
	I'd hate to see something happen to this place.
	I can make sure that nothing happens because, you know, if you don't pay me, something might happen.
	We need to actually empower people with the information they need for themselves and their families because every family is different.
	This is Deborah Birx saying this now?
	After two years of saying the opposite, you got Fauci now saying, well, this is for the individual to decide.
	We know it doesn't work from a public health standpoint, but it's for the individual.
	Birx goes even further.
	This is for the individual and the family to decide.
	And by the way, playing outside is safe.
	Playgrounds are safe.
	Really? Wow.
	I guess we can believe it now.
	Because Fauci and Birx, well, at least Birx says so.
	Now that she says this, the Trump media is happy to report that.
	But, you know, the fact that she was Trump's pick, he put her on the Operation Warp Speed thing, and he kept her there and gave her a medal for that as well.
	And so this is the headline from Zero Hedge.
	Trump lockdown tyrant.
	Does a 180 says no new masks?
	No new mask mandates.
	And as I point out, a former military researcher, AIDS researcher, that's how she got hooked up with Fauci.
	He created that whole AIDS thing.
	And I played for you the clips where he was saying, yeah, you know, you've got to keep your distance.
	You can catch the AIDS from just being around somebody like that.
	Remember how they excoriated people for saying when Fauci claimed that he had proof that it was caused by a virus and so forth?
	And it's in the blood and all the rest of the stuff, and everybody was sending them, then, can mosquitoes transfer?
	I mean, that was a logical conclusion of Fauci's lies about AIDS. We know none of that is true now.
	Of course, he also tried to push remdesivir as a cure for AIDS. But he really rode that into prominence.
	And so, you know, the people who said that, who went to the logical conclusion, assuming that Fauci was telling them the truth, which he wasn't, they were excoriated.
	You know, you are pushing homophobia if you say this could be transferred by mosquitoes and things like that.
	But that was a logical conclusion from what he was telling people.
	So she got connected with Fauci, with the AIDS research.
	But as they point out on Zero Hedge, she had no training, no experience, no publications in epidemiology or in public health policy.
	Why did Trump put her on?
	I don't know. He didn't use the best people, did he?
	He didn't pick the best people, did he?
	His picks were horrible, including this.
	Except that if you want somebody who's going to push a political agenda, they don't need to have training, experience, publications.
	They don't need to know anything about epidemiology.
	They just need to follow the orders, and that's what Trump was doing as well.
	He was following the orders to these people.
	She had a similar role in dictating how the Trump task force was telling the country to lock down for the pandemic.
	In March of 2020, Birx and Fauci were grinning like Cheshire cats, writes Zero Edge, as they laid out an unprecedented lockdown and masking strategy, which Birx later admitted they pulled out of their behinds.
	Now that we're revisiting mask mandates over the latest COVID-19 surge, they're seemingly on different sides of the debate.
	So she goes on on Sunday and says we don't need a mandate.
	Oh, but she called it a mandate.
	Did you see that? That she's a little bit too clever.
	You know, he's going to play around.
	Well, we didn't mandate anything.
	We made recommendations here.
	And so, person says, okay, here we are.
	You know, now we're into this for years and we don't need a mandate anymore.
	So, When you look at Trump, again, Trump says, Fear-mongering about the new COVID variants is a lunatic ploy to rig the 2024 election.
	The Epoch Times headline.
	So it's all about rigging the election, is it?
	Well, was that what the 2020 version that you did, Trump?
	Was that what that was about then? Did you do that to rig the election?
	Did you do that to rig the election with the mail out all the ballot stuff and everything?
	Was this a long-term plan?
	Was this like a professional wrestling thing where you pose as the anti-globalist and the globalists say, oh yeah, he's horrible.
	You know, he's against us and everything.
	And then you get all of the people who would have opposed this if Hillary had done it, if Biden had done it.
	All of those people just, well, maybe they don't comply, but they don't actively resist and oppose it.
	They just kind of shut up and sit down.
	Because Trump is running this thing.
	Was that what this was all about?
	And then Trump puts in the mail election, you know, mail out ballots to everybody.
	The more, the merrier.
	Harvest the ballots and all the rest of the stuff.
	And then when he loses, he calls foul.
	He sets up this whole January the 6th thing.
	And now he is setting this up so that, you know, again, playing by the same rules that he's already lost by once.
	He is setting himself up to get the nomination and lose the general election and then push us into a civil war.
	That's the next step. This is the left-right progression.
	This is the tag team professional wrestling stuff.
	Oh yeah, Trump's on your side, right?
	Remember, he's now out there saying this.
	The left-wing lunatics are trying very hard to bring back COVID lockdowns and mandates with all of their sudden fear-mongering...
	Who did that in 2020?
	You did it. Gee whiz, you know what else is coming?
	An election. They want to restart the COVID hysteria so they can justify more lockdowns, more censorship, more illegal drop boxes, more mail-in ballots, and trillions of dollars in payoffs to their political allies heading into the 2024 election.
	Does that sound familiar? Yeah, because you did it.
	These are sick people we're dealing with.
	But to every COVID tyrant who wants to take away our freedom, hear these words, we will not comply.
	We will continue to lie.
	That's really what he should say.
	Trump continues to lie.
	You heard the list there, right?
	These left-wing lunatics.
	It's the left-wing lunatics.
	It's not him. Fear-mongering.
	We introduced their left-wing lockdown and mandate policies.
	It was all done under his administration.
	All of that was done under his administration.
	And as a matter of fact, he took credit for it.
	You know, not only the fact that he was Fauci's yes man, but as I showed this to you on Thursday, he put out a post for the purpose of creating conflict and confusion.
	Some of the fake news media are saying that it is their governor's decision to open up the states.
	Not that of the president of the United States, the federal government.
	Let it be fully understood. This is incorrect.
	It is the decision of the president, and for many reasons.
	He shut it down. He opens it up.
	Right? Yeah.
	Trump giveth and Trump taketh away your freedoms.
	It's all about him. He did everything.
	But anyway, he said, I'm going to warn these tyrants to take away your freedoms like I did in 2020.
	You know, these people want it today.
	They are tyrants.
	So, yeah.
	But here's a conspiracy theory.
	Perhaps Trump did this for his masters, you think?
	Yeah, possibly. Listen to what he had to say with Fox News, because Fox News is selling this mask stuff.
	Say, well, you know, this is a good thing.
	And they go to Trump White House, and the guy says, you know, Goldman Sachs says this will be good.
	Don't you think you should do this?
	Oh, yeah, I think probably we should.
	I do, I do.
	Yeah, sure, at some point. And I think we're going to have a vaccine very soon, too.
	Speaking of COVID-19, Goldman Sachs put out a model yesterday saying that universal masks, it would be a net positive for GDP. We know the IHME model says that if there were universal masks, that it would be beneficial, it would save lives.
	So if there is an economic benefit, sir, and there is a public health benefit, sir, why not go forward and say there should be mandatory masks all across this country?
	Well, I don't know if you need mandatory because you have many places in the country where people stay very long distance.
	You talk about social distancing, but I'm all for masks.
	I think masks are good. If I were in a group of people and I was close...
	You would wear one? Oh, I would.
	Oh, I have. I mean, people have seen me wearing one.
	If I'm in a group of people where we're not, you know, 10 feet away, but usually I'm not in that position and everyone's tested because I'm the president.
	They get tested before they see me.
	But if I were in a tight situation with people, I would absolutely...
	See that at some point? I mean, I'd have no problem.
	Actually, I had a mask, and I sort of liked the way I looked.
	Okay, I thought it was okay.
	It was a dark, black mask, and I thought it looked okay.
	It looked like the Lone Ranger.
	Looked like Darth Vader.
	I have no problem with that.
	I think, and if people feel good about it, they should.
	Bane. Bane of our existence.
	Yeah, you know, Goldman Sachs, says Fox says.
	Goldman Sachs says it'd be good.
	They've got a model.
	They've got a computer model.
	Says it'd be good. Yeah.
	Yeah. Pretty soon.
	AI. AI says it'd be good.
	And Goldman Sachs has got an AI that says it's going to be good.
	So, yeah. How do we justify lockdowns, censorship, illegal drop boxes, mail-in ballots, and trillions of dollars in payoffs to political allies?
	Which is everything that he did.
	He's now projecting it on other people.
	Amazing. They rigged the 2020 election, and they're going to do the same thing again.
	And he admits, nearly, that it was all a pandemic.
	Oh, so this wasn't about the virus, this was about rigging the election?
	And so how did you use it, Trump?
	So, again, you know, was this taking orders from Goldman Sachs and the rest of these people?
	Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk.
	Says, there's a plot to push COVIDian tyranny and lock you down again just in time for the election.
	Just mimic everything that Trump has to say, Charlie.
	That's your job, right?
	Trump does what Fauci says, and he repeats it and he executes it.
	And then Charlie Kirk and his sycophantic MAGA media people, right, like him, of his ilk, they do whatever Trump says.
	So they're basically pushing what Fauci says, right?
	So, again, you know, Deborah Brooks was two and a half years late on all this stuff.
	Now Charlie Kirk has come around as well, two and a half years late.
	But, yeah, finally he gets it.
	And then Trump said, if he is elected, he would use every available authority to push back on mask and vaccine mandates and Cutting federal funding.
	That's how he would do it, right?
	What did I say? When all this stuff was on it, I said, he's paying the governors, Republican and Democrat, to do what he wants.
	And if they don't do what he wants, he cuts their funding.
	But he gave them so much money, these governors had Gavin Newsom, Cuomo, people like Brad Little in Idaho.
	These people had several times the amount of money that the entire state budget was at their personal discretion to use to buy political power and favors from people.
	So they're going to do exactly what Trump and Fauci wanted to do.
	And I said, you know, the buck stops with the president, but the buck also starts with the president, and that's how they get their policies out there.
	And so he says, I would cut federal funding to colleges or airlines that have mandates like this.
	And except he paid them to have these kind of mandates at the beginning.
	He paid the airlines, right?
	They got a lot of relief.
	You do what I say. Oh, we're going to, you know, hit you with fines and things like that.
	The interesting thing about this...
	Is that he promises that if he is elected for a second term, he will do the things that DeSantis did as governor.
	Because that's all the stuff that DeSantis did.
	Trump didn't do that.
	DeSantis did those things.
	He said it's going to push back on mask and vaccine mandates.
	It's going to punish people downstream of the state government by withholding their funds.
	Trump didn't do that.
	He did just the opposite of that.
	And then, of course, Biden is saying, you know, he's popping in for a new vaccine.
	He says, this one works.
	And we're going to make sure that everybody gets it.
	So the Trump press is calling it the election variant.
	No, 2020 was Trump's election variant.
	And that election variant, unfortunately, is still with us.
	Who's going to get rid of this vote-by-mail stuff?
	Why isn't anybody talking about that?
	We don't need to have that now.
	There's no lockdown.
	And so they're saying, well, you know, they left that in place, just like they've left their usurped power in place.
	And so that's why these people are saying, well, we're going to do the election again like we did in 2020?
	Everybody stay home? If you don't take these things away, if you don't take away the power that they grabbed, if you don't take away these new rules that Trump put in, yeah, they're going to do it exactly the same way.
	One way or the other. Roxanne, thank you very much, Eric.
	I appreciate the tip. That's very kind.
	Appreciate that. So, New Jersey Nursing Home.
	Slammed by COVID surge as COVID deaths rise.
	And they say this county...
	Was also hit especially hard at the height of the COVID and was recorded more than 448 outbreaks since early 2020.
	Again, why is it in this particular county, Bergen County, just northwest of New York City, is it something about COVID that it just loves that environment there or something?
	Is it in the soil or something there in that county?
	Or maybe it's the people who are declaring the pandemic.
	Maybe it's not a bug.
	Maybe it's the bureaucrats who are bugging us.
	Is that what that is? Why would it be the same?
	You kick off the... Here's the first county and they got it the worst.
	And now they're getting it first again and the worst again.
	Seriously? Why can't people see this?
	Now, here's the good news.
	You hang tough.
	You stand up for your freedom.
	You don't know what's going to happen.
	There's no guarantee that you're going to win.
	But you could win big. We've seen a lot of people win big.
	And here's another situation.
	A fired professor wins a key victory in her free speech case over mask and vaccine policy.
	Patricia Griffin, who says she was fired for asking questions, Asking questions when they announced what their mask and vaccination policies were going to be.
	She had some questions. I've got some questions.
	You're fired. She was granted a narrow win after the university filed a motion to dismiss the case in part.
	The judge, U.S. District Judge John Levy, ruled that while her First Amendment claim can proceed, other charges were dismissed.
	So she's going to sue them on that.
	They don't want to make this about the vaccine.
	They make it about her First Amendment rights.
	But look, we'll make it about anything that we can.
	Make these people pay for what they did.
	Your First Amendment rights of free speech and questions, your religious beliefs, whatever you can get these people for, go after them.
	Punish them. Because the government's not going to do anything.
	The GOP establishment, Trump, none of these people are going to do anything to stop any of this.
	So make them pay. Make these companies pay.
	Make these universities pay.
	Trump says, well, I'm going to cut their money off.
	He probably won't.
	You cut their money off.
	Do a lawsuit. Look, it's a lot less riskier than Governor DeWine's lottery.
	Remember that? You know, hey, get a vaccine, and I'll put your name in a hat, and you might win a million dollars.
	And if you lose, you might die or be disabled the rest of your life.
	With this, the worst that happens on the downside is you lose your job and you don't get any compensation for it.
	You lose a job working for a bunch of creeps who think they get to dictate to you everything in your life.
	That's not much of a loss, quite frankly.
	In the long term, you'll find that it's a benefit.
	But you might, if you resist this stuff and push back on these people, You might win the lottery as well.
	So again, that's the way that we need to respond to this thing.
	Do not comply.
	Don't listen to Trump's lies.
	By the way, the nurse that was talking in the video that played last week, that was from back in 2020.
	Even then, I think I said it was recent.
	I had not seen that before.
	But even then, people understood what this is.
	Oh, two weeks from now?
	How do you know two weeks from now this is going to happen?
	Or two months from now this is going to happen?
	I said that all along.
	We saw that from Trump.
	We saw it from Biden.
	We saw it from Macron.
	We saw it from Trudeau.
	Every one of these globalist leaders, regardless of whether they posed as globalist leaders or not, they all did the same thing.
	In New Zealand, the new Prime Minister who replaced Jab Sinda Arden is now denying that vaccines were compulsory.
	Same line, same lie as Fauci.
	We didn't make you do it.
	Yeah, we didn't. Yeah.
	And so, Rebecca Barnett says, we're at the, quote, no one made you take it.
	It was your choice stage of the pandemic.
	New Zealand's new Prime Minister, Chris Hipkins, Time reporters on Sunday, in terms of the vaccine mandates, I acknowledge it was a difficult time for people, but they ultimately made their own choices.
	There was no compulsory vaccination.
	People made their own choices.
	Oh, really? Was that, you know, the no jab, no job?
	See, it's a choice. It's a choice.
	He's not forcing anybody to do this stuff.
	Jabsenda Arden said, if you want summer, if you want to go to bars and restaurants, get vaccinated.
	If you want to get a haircut, get vaccinated.
	If you want to go to a concert or a festival, get vaccinated.
	If you want to go to a gym or a sporting event, get vaccinated.
	If you are not vaccinated, these are everyday things that you're going to miss out on.
	So, it was your choice, right?
	Says Rebecca Barnett.
	Another one. It's like if a mugger pulls a gun on you, says give me your wallet.
	Technically, you don't have to comply.
	Yeah. You know, it's like your money or your life.
	You've got a choice, right?
	They hold the gun to your head.
	Your money or your life.
	See, thank you for voluntarily complying with the income tax rule.
	Yeah. So you basically said, you probably don't see it like this, said a reporter, but there's two different classes of people.
	This reporter said to Jab Sinda Arden at the time.
	So if you're vaccinated or unvaccinated, you have all these rights if you're vaccinated.
	And Jab Sinda Arden said, yep, that's what it is.
	Yep. Yeah.
	So there you go. Choice. He says, I've said all along.
	Trump was already running this scam.
	And I told people, well, you're not voting for Trump?
	Well, we know that Biden's going to mandate this stuff.
	And I said, people will understand that Biden is mandating it.
	They don't understand that Trump is coercing it and that he's already doing it through companies who are complying with his orders that he's repeating from Fauci.
	And, you know, it is...
	Does it with carrots and bribery in the same way that DeWine did it.
	And then the Democrats come along and they get rougher.
	And they say, well, you know, we're going to, no more bribes.
	We're just going to blackmail you.
	You do it or else. And I said, at least at that point, especially because it's a partisan thing now.
	Oh, that's a Democrat giving me orders?
	Well, I'm not taking orders from a Democrat.
	I'd take them from Trump because he's playing 4D chess.
	But I'm not taking any orders from any Democrat.
	And so they'll push back for that, and they'll push back because they understand that it's an order.
	They've got a misplaced trust in Trump.
	And so this is what it looked like in Australia.
	Here's a woman. About a half dozen cops.
	Not arrest her. People are there filming it and hectoring the cops, but they dare not get physical with the cops because the cops have a license to kill, right?
	Like James Bond or something.
	She was in there and she refused to show her.
	She wasn't the queen, she was the queen.
	I'm happy to show you my information.
	You don't have that.
	What are you doing?
	What are you pulling that back out of here?
	Leave her alone.
	Leave her alone.
	You cannot arrest her.
	You can't arrest me.
	You have been arrested.
	This is ridiculous.
	Yeah, they can do whatever they want.
	They're the police. They got a uniform and a title.
	You guys are filth.
	Sorry. Sorry, we're what?
	Filth. Yeah, the big guy.
	Big guy there. Big cop with a mask.
	You guys are filth. Oh yeah?
	What? What'd you say about that?
	You're filth. Like that guy last week.
	You know, I got four years law enforcement, or 40 years, or whatever it was.
	You know, I didn't realize that you hate the police.
	I hate the police that use their authority like that.
	There are police who follow their oath to the Constitution.
	They get fired. They get purged.
	These people get promoted.
	You want to talk about what they're doing in Maui, other places like that?
	Oh, well, you hate the police then.
	No, I hate institutions that have been corrupted because they embrace that kind of behavior, because they push that kind of behavior out, because they push the people who refuse to engage in that kind of behavior out.
	They're left with a certain class of people like that tall guy who was going to come over there and get in the face of the person who's reporting.
	Travis tells me it's Harp's birthday in Australia, so happy birthday, Harp's.
	Happier times this year than it was three years ago, right?
	So, hopefully we're not going to let them do this to us again.
	Many of us didn't let them do it the first time.
	And so, again, the same article.
	Signed in a Perth doctor's clinic during the height of the workplace vaccine mandates.
	COVID vaccines are, all uppercase, mandatory in some industries.
	All vaccines have to be consented to.
	Please do not abuse our staff if you feel coerced into your vaccine.
	So here we are. Nobody made you take it, right?
	That's what they're going to say. You know, when you have uncontrollable tremors or you're paralyzed or your family member is dead, nobody made you take it.
	You took it voluntarily because, you know, your kid took it because the kid wanted to be in the junior varsity basketball team or something.
	And now he's had a heart attack and he's dead.
	But it was your choice.
	A Florida physician. Who was fired, and this is Dr.
	John Little. I played the video when this happened.
	He had been fighting with a board there in Florida, in DeSantis' Florida, and Latipo is the Surgeon General.
	He was fighting this stuff, and he went to speak up at a public meeting.
	Talking about how there was only one allowed treatment and that treatment didn't work and the stuff that they knew worked was being kept from people.
	When he spoke up about that, they stripped him of his board certification.
	He has taken legal action and he now has that back.
	A long-time family physician in Ocala and a medical school professor.
	Began posting videos sharing his thoughts about COVID-19 testing, treatments, and vaccines early on in the so-called pandemic.
	He was frustrated to find his content was often pulled down from his YouTube channel.
	So he moved his content to Rumble.
	Then in January of 2022, and again five months later, he received warning letters from the American Board of Family Medicine.
	A letter said that his videos on YouTube and Rumble spread, quote, medical misinformation and could put his board certification in jeopardy.
	So when he showed up in person, To speak against these hospital policies, that's when they pulled it.
	And at the center of his persecution was Ivermectin.
	Well, when we come back, we're going to talk before we leave the medical stuff and get into some of the spiritual sickness of this country.
	Joe Rogan, Andrew Tate, Woody Allen, Emma Stone, all the rest of this stuff, both left and right, you know?
	It truly is amazing.
	We're going to talk about that, but I've got another thing to talk about in terms of the pharmaceutical war that is going on between Pfizer and Moderna.
	It appears that there is no honor among thieves.
	Imagine my surprise.
	And there's no honor among mass murderers either.
	The two of them are after each other because there is a big tidal wave of vaccines using mRNA technology on the way.
	And they both want to have that entire pile of money for themselves.
	On Rumble, BusyB777, thank you for the tip.
	Last week, Orange Royer of Infowars also said the line, nobody made anyone take the vaccine.
	Did he really? Well, nobody made anybody go to the Capitol on January 6th either, Ellen.
	Trump supporters don't care.
	They're excusing Fauci and Borla and the rest if it means that they can excuse Trump.
	Yeah, that's what it is. That's what it is.
	Yeah, they're playing 40 chess, and you are their pawns.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back. Thank
	Thank you.
	Making Sense.
	common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, on Rumble, thank you very much, Christos.
	I appreciate the tip. Thank you again for your hard work.
	Well, thank you.
	But, you know, this is the time that we live in, folks.
	We live in interesting times.
	And, you know, God has chosen to put us in such a time as this.
	So it's up to us to...
	To toe the line and to keep the course on this stuff.
	Look, Pfizer, as I said before, they're not in a court battle.
	They just kind of sat back and enjoy it.
	I remember when people said, you know, you look at the Iran-Iraq war.
	What do you do? You just sat back and...
	Hope they both lose. I hope both Pfizer and Moderna both lose in this thing.
	They have asked the U.S. court to revoke Moderna's patents for COVID-19 vaccine technology.
	Here's the way I see this rolling out.
	I think I've said this before, but I haven't said it too often.
	If you go back and you look at Operation Warp Speed, and of course Fauci was running this thing, and who did he put in charge technically of Operation Warp Speed?
	Monseth Slouy. And if you go back and you look, Monsef Slaoui and Fauci, as I said before, I started researching Monsef Slaoui.
	I had not heard of him before. But when I started looking, I found that he and Francis Collins and Fauci were like, you know, three amigos.
	Every time they have one of these pharmaceutical things, they're out there talking.
	And by the way, in the last few years before this happened, in the late teens, they were all pushing electroceuticals.
	And that's, you know, the thing to come after the mRNA stuff.
	And so, you know, electroceuticals, the way of the future and everything, but also the mRNA thing.
	And it was not the first time that Fauci and Monsef Slaoui had collaborated.
	He had been the head of vaccine technology.
	I can't remember the name of it.
	I think it was Merck, but I'm not sure if it was Merck or it was a different one.
	But one of the big drug companies, Monsef Slaoui, had been the chief of the vaccine stuff.
	And so they had worked together on some of these...
	HPV vaccines.
	But they'd also worked together and pushed out pandemics with the swine flu thing.
	And I've mentioned that in the past several times because in Scandinavian countries where they didn't have the political pressure to not look and to say nothing and to see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil about the pharmaceutical companies, they actually identified That they had a large number of kids who had been given pandemics,
	the thing that Monsef Slawi's company came up with that Fauci pushed, had a large percentage of kids who got narcolepsy or catalepsy.
	And narcolepsy just makes you fall asleep at really, you know, suddenly at unexpected times.
	Catalepsy makes you freeze.
	And, of course, there's been stories.
	Edgar Allan Poe, it's a very rare thing, but Edgar Allan Poe, you know, did that in premature burial.
	And then, I think, Arthur Conan Doyle did that in one of his Sherlock Holmes things.
	But it's very strange.
	We saw some pictures of people getting that kind of adverse reaction.
	With these COVID shots as well.
	But they had worked together.
	And in Scandinavia, they said, you know, you're giving this to the kids.
	And, you know, that was a little over a decade ago.
	Now these kids, some of them in their early to mid-20s, there was, you know, a year or two ago, one of them committed suicide because they could not have a life, couldn't do anything.
	The narcolepsy was so bad.
	You know, couldn't drive a car, he might fall asleep suddenly, that type of thing.
	So they had rushed a flu type of vaccine out without doing sufficient testing once before.
	They had been partners at a lot of these different conferences.
	And so, you know, you go back again to the Trump campaign.
	Dog and Pony show that's staged for television where he gets all the different drug companies in at the table, literally, and he goes to the first one.
	How long is it going to take you? Oh, that's way too long.
	Next one, a little bit less time, but still way too long.
	On and on down there, and they get to Moderna.
	Moderna says, well, we got mRNA, and we can do it right now because we'll make your body manufacture the antigen.
	And we don't have to go through the manufacturing.
	All right, that's it. You're going to do it.
	Make you the head of Operation Warp Speed.
	The whole thing was staged. They even had the different companies there in descending order of how long it's going to take them to manufacture this stuff.
	And so I've said from the very beginning that this whole thing was set up by Fauci and Slaoui to help Moderna, help his pal.
	He was going to participate in it somehow.
	I bet if you look, eventually somebody's going to find out.
	There's probably some kind of financial kickback there to Fauci.
	That's my hunch. But again, no receipts for that.
	That's just a hunch. Maybe they're just really good friends and he just wanted to see his friend make tens of millions of dollars.
	Who knows? Or billions.
	But, you know, they were there and they had this stuff ready to go.
	And it was my opinion that this stuff, and we know because we've seen how a lot of this stuff was already pre-done.
	They're ready to roll this stuff out.
	In anticipation of this.
	And then Pfizer got in.
	And Pfizer is a big corrupt company that's got lots of manufacturing muscle.
	And so they shoved their way in.
	And kind of leapfrogged over Moderna.
	And so Moderna sued them for violating their patents.
	And now Pfizer is fighting them in court.
	Even after, you know, Pfizer has been blackmailing people, blackmailing not people, but governments, entire governments, countries.
	Three of them in South America talked about it, Brazil, Argentina, and a third unnamed country that eventually complied with their blackmail stuff and said that you've got to hold us harmless from any manufacturing negligence.
	Any other things like that, in addition to the fact that we just rushed this thing through untested, of course that's a given.
	You're going to not charge us for that.
	But if we're really sloppy and careless, if we do things like have the active ingredient vary from 3 micrograms to 100 micrograms, a factor of 33, you're not going to come after us.
	For manufacturing stuff.
	And you're going to guarantee this by giving us title to property that is outside of your country.
	You're going to back it up with that.
	And so some of them went public, and it's not just those South American countries.
	We've now had countries in Europe and other places who have come out talking about that, how Pfizer is trying to blackmail them.
	Now they're saying that Moderna's patents are so broad that they essentially co-opt the entire field of messenger RNA technology.
	And there's going to be a big bunch of stuff coming down the pipe from the American government.
	This is a gold mine, this mRNA stuff.
	The patents are unimaginably broad and cover technology that was known long before 2015 when Moderna developed the technology, says one of the filings.
	They point to experiments that Dr.
	Robert Malone and others reported in 1990.
	In Science Magazine, a test described in a 1993 paper in the European Journal of Immunology.
	And so Robert Malone has something to say about this now.
	He said it's interesting to watch this fight here.
	And now he finds himself at the center of this, his work.
	Subsequent improvements to the technology, such as using lipid nanoparticles to deliver the messenger RNA, were also described in public materials before...
	Moderna requested patents, say the filing.
	And when I say that they, you know, Pfizer kind of leapfrogged Moderna, when they were organized, they operated for 10 years without ever having a profit, without ever having any product go to market.
	They were just running on fairy tale stories that they told Wall Street to get people to invest into their company.
	And so they did that for 10 years.
	And when they started their company, the entire focus was on messenger RNA. They called their company Mode RNA, and then they changed the emphasis on the different syllables to make it Moderna.
	Pfizer CEO Albert Borla said during the conference in 2020 that the company's mRNA vaccine was using an antigen, quote, which is, I think, the same like the one Moderna is using, unquote.
	So it's going to be a back and forth.
	They kind of admitted, yeah, we're using the same thing they're doing and so forth.
	Now they're going to say that, you know, because of work that was done back in the 1990s.
	So Robert Malone writes this Substack piece and writes, The delights of the Pfizer-Moderna catfight, he says.
	I'm a bit embarrassed, he says, to admit that I'm taking a perverse pleasure in watching the catfight between Pfizer-Moderna play out.
	Not to gloat, but I find it validating and rather satisfying to watch these companies file lawsuits and counter-lawsuits that boil down to a schoolyard squabble over who came up with the ideas and the initial proof of concept for using mRNA for developing drugs and vaccines.
	He says, which I actually did, and then people criticized him and said, no, he didn't do that.
	He's putting this on his CV and he didn't really do this stuff.
	Companies that have exploited and unethically weaponized my early work and ideas, he said, for enormous profit while also seeking to write me out of history.
	Oh, what a tangled web we weave and force a practice to deceive, right?
	That's what he says next.
	He says, just to be clear for the haters, I received a total of one U.S. dollar for my pioneering work, discoveries, and patents relating to my graduate research involving mRNA delivery at the Salk Institute.
	And UCSD, University of California, San Diego, and Vical between 1986 and 1990.
	I played no role in development of any gene therapy-based COVID vaccine.
	The record shows that I was one of the early objectors to the rushed worldwide deployment of this technology.
	And I actively highlighted the now proven fact that the spike protein expressed using this technology is a toxin.
	For speaking about this, I was widely criticized, fact-checked, and ridiculed in corporate media and by the likes of Dr. Paul Offit.
	Furthermore, I discovered and documented the profound toxicity in both cell culture and animals, Associated with the use of cationic lipids for delivering mRNA and DNA during the 1990s, documented and disclosed this at a conference that I organized where I invited and first met Dr.
	K. Carrico about a decade after my initial work at Salk Institute.
	So what he's saying is, yes, I found this.
	I discovered this. We published it.
	We talked about it.
	I didn't create any vaccines or anything, but I even talked about And I told people how bad it was.
	And I didn't want to participate in it.
	Didn't make any money with it. And even blew the whistle on the lipid nanoparticles, which in and of themselves are very dangerous.
	And so now these companies are fighting each other over this.
	And here's why. $136.2 billion.
	U.S. government and pharmaceutical companies are investing a substantial amount to develop new mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases and cancer.
	And you remember how we started out the program?
	We had the email from Handy talking about Emory University and how they're right next to the CDC. Guess who is right at the center of using the mRNA stuff for every kind of treatment?
	Including supposedly stopping cancer.
	What a joke. What a joke.
	This thing that they release inside of you that just starts replicating and there's no off switch to it.
	It's like a cancer in and of itself.
	Oh, well, we'll use it to cure cancer.
	You talk about twisting this stuff.
	But this is why the patent lawsuits, $136 billion in research.
	How much do you think they're going to, what do they think they're going to make if they're willing to put $136 billion of research into it?
	And of course, a lot of that money is coming from the U.S. government.
	But these people want to, both of these companies want to own the patent, or to say that it's in the public domain.
	If it's in the public domain, then Pfizer wins out because of their manufacturing capability.
	A newly established White House program announced on August the 23rd will be granting a total of $25 million over three years to Emory University.
	So they're there and there's other universities that are there, but it's a really big industry.
	And again, it's not just the spike protein.
	It's not just that the mRNA is modifying your DNA. We've seen that as well.
	They used to say, well, that can't happen.
	And then, you know, in the middle of all this stuff, they had some research from Thomas Jefferson University that said, no, it does.
	It can be used to modify the DNA. And sometimes it does it inadvertently.
	You know, we want to look at everything as being cut and dried and perfected.
	You know, we look at the CRISPR-Cas9 genetic modification, the editor and everything.
	We think that this is some kind of a scalpel.
	It's not. It's like a chainsaw.
	It messes a bunch of stuff up, as many people have compared it to that.
	It can make some unintended changes.
	Any technology is going to have unintended consequences.
	Nothing that man makes works perfectly.
	And so you're going to have some unintended consequences.
	If you stop and think about the purpose of the mRNA is to copy the DNA, they would always say, well, it doesn't modify it.
	It just copies it. Well, if it doesn't copy it correctly, that's a modification, isn't it?
	And then they admitted, well, yeah, it actually can be used to modify the DNA. But then you also have the lipid nanoparticles.
	It's not just the spike protein that causes the disease.
	The LMPs that serve as the delivery method are also toxic and pro-inflammatory.
	Research from 2018, before all this stuff happened, showed even small amounts of nanoparticles taken up by the lungs can lead to cytotoxic effects.
	Injected nanoparticles have been shown to affect lymph nodes, the liver, and the spleen, while when injected as a drug carrier, they can pass any barrier, and they can translocate to the brain, to ovaries, to testes, Mainly after phagocytosis by macrophages, which helps distribute them across the body.
	The effect of the reproductive system suggests lipid nanoparticles can be cytotoxic and can damage DNA. So, with all of this happening, we see the vindication of people here and there that have been wrongfully terminated, Some of them getting some very good compensation, whether they are nurses or airline people or university professors or doctors.
	Doctors are getting their licenses back and other things like that.
	We see now a federal court Rules against the FDA over these anti-ivermectin posts.
	And this is a lawsuit that was brought by a trio of doctors because, essentially, the FDA is practicing medicine without a license.
	Fauci practiced medicine without a license.
	Birx did the same thing.
	The CDC did the same thing.
	Trump did the same thing.
	These are not recommendations.
	They're not choices. They were mandates.
	They were bullying people, bribing, blackmailing.
	Call it anything you want to, but we know exactly what this thing was.
	And so the FDA was telling people that the doctors in this lawsuit said the FDA can inform, but it has no authority allowing it to recommend consumers stop taking medicine.
	That's not what the lawsuit says.
	That's what the U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett wrote in the ruling.
	You can't tell people to stop taking medication that you've approved.
	And that's what they had approved.
	They had approved both ACQ and ivermectin.
	This is just for off-label use.
	They had not approved it specifically for that particular thing, but it had been in use for 60 years, these two drugs plus.
	And people knew what its safety profile was.
	So, you know, hey, the FDA has said it's quote-unquote safe, whatever that means, because there's always adverse effects with anything.
	I'm not saying it's like drinking water.
	You've got to be careful about the water as well.
	But, you know, like Colonel McGregor says, they're not spending any money to clean up Palestine, Ohio.
	They're going to give it all to Ukraine.
	And watch it go down the pipes.
	The corruption is so bad there that Zelensky had to appear to be doing something about it.
	So he just fired one of the people that was a part of that military material that they're getting in there.
	But it's thoroughly corrupt that's there.
	And so is our government. But, you know...
	It is not harmless, but it has a known safety profile.
	And so always in the past, physicians would be able to make the determination that they wanted to use a drug that had been approved for use and an off-label use.
	And so essentially, the FDA was trying to practice medicine without a license, like all these healthier crafts were.
	The FDA, during the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple statements discouraging people from taking ivermectin.
	We all remember the mocking lies about, you're not a horse, stop taking this.
	You're not a horse, you're not a cow.
	Seriously, y'all, stop it.
	But they also had on their website a page that that little mocking thing linked to that said why you should not use ivermectin to treat or to prevent COVID-19.
	So these three doctors sued over that.
	And it looks like the judge agrees with them.
	Federal law gives the government immunity against legal actions, but with some exceptions.
	One exception, known as ultra-v-res, if I'm pronouncing that correctly, is when an official acts outside of their authority.
	Plaintiffs who challenge those acts must show that the official was, quote, acting without any authority whatever, or without any, quote, colorable basis for the exercise of authority.
	Pretty much everything they did was outside of the law.
	I mean, you've got the CDC saying, Coming in, interjecting themselves into financial contracts, saying you're not going to be able to foreclose or evict people who don't pay rent.
	Where'd they get that authority?
	It doesn't matter what you think of the policy.
	You know, and your compassion might say, well, you know, Trump took their job, took their business, told them they couldn't go to work and all the rest of the stuff.
	They don't have any way to pay. I understand that.
	But where did he get the authority to do that?
	And then they compound it.
	Rather than fixing the original mistake...
	The government will always make a second mistake.
	So then they give dictatorial power to the CDC to say, we're going to interject ourselves under these contracts.
	They should have fixed the original usurpation.
	Instead, they double down with more usurpations to the agency that is at the center of all this stuff.
	So, the FDA has the authority to share data and facts, the parties agreed.
	Well, disinformation, misinformation, They were lying, and we knew they were lying, and we already had in many countries where they had done studies.
	They said, well, here's a situation.
	You've got some cases, and it's kind of popping along here.
	You start taking the ivermectin, and it goes straight down to zero.
	And then the vaccine comes in, and it shoots up way higher than it ever was claimed to be.
	Despite these concessions, the FDA never points to any authority that allows it to issue recommendations or to give medical advice, says the judge.
	Rather, FDA argues that some posts included a hyperlink that leads to the update.
	The update in turn directs consumers to, quote, talk to your health care provider, unquote.
	That's the phrase that made hundreds of billions of dollars for the cable news companies, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, since the 1990s.
	Yeah, ask your health care provider.
	But not all the social media links included such a link, and even for those posts that did include a link, the posts themselves offered advice, not merely information, said the judge.
	So it's good to see the FDA getting at least some comeuppance, but of course they're not going to have much of a penalty involved in this.
	Now, there's an interesting article, and it needs to be talked about.
	Brian Shalhavi at Health Impact News.
	Headline is, More Children...
	Under the age of 16, died from non-COVID vaccines, then from COVID vaccines since December of 2020.
	And he begins by talking about how, you know, we have heavily gone into and shown what is in the VAERS database, and then other things that are not in the VAERS database, of course, we have talked about.
	You know, these kids who are now all children, Have to be screened for the risk of myocarditis because, you know, they've got myocarditis and they're out there doing strenuous stuff like a kid does.
	They could die of a heart attack just like an old person who's had a heart attack because it's the same profile.
	If you have myocarditis and you can tell because it's got troponin in the blood, same as if you had some kind of a heart attack issue, then you are at the same risk of death from a heart attack.
	That's a person who's had a prior heart attack.
	Same mechanism happening here with myocarditis and pericarditis that happens with a heart attack.
	And the prognosis is 50% chance of death in five years.
	So, he's right about the fact...
	His point in all of this is to call out the people...
	Who will focus, like RFK Jr., Brian Chalhavi has focused very heavily on RFK Jr., who has opposed the COVID vaccine and has opposed childhood vaccines, but says, I'm not anti-vaccine.
	And I agree.
	And he talks about how much money Children's Health Defense has made off of the COVID vaccines.
	Because this has been the most clear-cut and egregious case, I think, of the way they rushed this thing through.
	Obviously, no testing, no concern about adverse effects or the health of people.
	He says it's tripled every year.
	A million dollars in 2018, $3 million in 2019, $6.7 million in 2020, the year COVID started, now to an astounding...
	$15.9 million in 2021.
	So the revenue has gone up exponentially, while RFK Jr.
	is saying that he is not anti-vaccine.
	And again, I don't hold him to as tight a standard as Brian does, because I think what he is saying is we've got to do the science, and we've got to test these things to see if they are safe and effective.
	And I think he knows, as we all do, that if he did do the science, it would show that they are not safe and effective.
	So it would be the same as being anti-vaccine.
	But he can try to placate the left with all this stuff and say, well, you know, I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
	I'm not anti-vaccine and all the rest of this stuff.
	I just say I'm anti-vaccine and have been for a long time.
	And like Brian Shalhavi, I was anti-vaccine before the COVID stuff happened.
	I'd seen the game that they ran every year with the flu vaccine and many of these other things.
	I'd seen the mandates that came along with the MMR, and I've played for you many times, Trump in 2019, May, saying, they've got to get the shot.
	It's going around. We're going to force this on kids whose parents have ethical and religious and medical objections.
	We don't care. You've got to take it.
	All these people say Trump isn't going to mandate this stuff.
	By hook or by crook, he was going to mandate it.
	He supported the mandate of the other stuff.
	He wasn't the one doing it. It was states that were doing it.
	New York, California, I think New Jersey, places like that that were doing it.
	But he 100% supported that because he 100% supported the pharmaceutical industry.
	RFK Jr. had opposed those types of things.
	And so, you know, I have mixed feelings about this article.
	It is important that you understand, though, the case that he's making.
	And that is how dangerous the standard kids' shots are.
	And there was a meme.
	I think I retweeted it.
	I saw Rhonda Tate had it and...
	It was, I saw it when I logged on to Twitter, and it showed the number of vaccines by the number of years.
	And so you get just two or three, you know, a couple of decades ago, and then it expands.
	And now it's up to like six dozen or something crazy like that.
	And that's the real issue right there.
	But at the same time, when he comes up with the statistics here, 149 children at the age of 16 have died after being injected with non-COVID vaccines since December of 2020.
	112 children under the age of 16 have died after being injected with COVID vaccines since December of 2020.
	Look a lot of this stuff is not reported and it's not reported correctly.
	And this data, I'm sure, does not, you know, we know, and as a matter of fact, I had a listener say, you know, that Harvard study said that they only reported, Harvard looked at the VAERS database, And so only 10% of these things are reported.
	That's what I said. It's only 1%.
	I've used this for a while, and I gave the wrong number.
	It's only 1% are reported.
	So you can't really make any decisions about this, especially because now there's pressure.
	You know, that was Harvard doing that study for the CDC. And they said only 1% of these things have been reported.
	Now, it's not just that it's...
	You know, a very cumbersome thing to do.
	These people are actively discouraged and essentially threatened not to report this stuff.
	It's very different with the COVID stuff.
	The bottom line, though, and the gist of this article is 100% true, and that is we must not lose sight of the fact that the standard childhood vaccines for which Fauci got legal immunity for these drug companies And that's one of the reasons why they're just multiplying them.
	Who cares? They can't be charged for any of this stuff.
	So let's ramp it up from two or three vaccines to 72 because we can make money and there's no liability.
	Wouldn't you like to have a business where there's absolutely no liability whatsoever for anything you do or say?
	No matter how much you harm other people, you can't be held responsible and you can make Amazing amounts of money with it.
	That's what's happening right now.
	And so we can't lose sight of the fact, as he points out, a lot of people have, you know, alternative health media have made a big career in terms of pushing the COVID stuff.
	He just mentions children's health defense is just one of them.
	But there's a lot who have.
	But it is the childhood vaccines.
	That are still a big threat to kids.
	And we need to never lose sight of that.
	And that's why I'm anti-vaccine and why Brian Shulhavi is anti-vaccine.
	Because we know what these standard approved Fauci, you know, protected vaccines are doing to kids.
	On Rumble, Knights of the Storm.
	Well, thank you, guys. I appreciate that for the tip.
	Thank you very much. Good to have you back, David.
	Hope you enjoyed the long weekend.
	I did. It was really, like I said, I needed a break badly.
	And I asked for a prayer for Karen.
	She had a bad fall.
	She didn't break anything. But, you know, we took a break.
	She nearly had a break.
	Fell down into some rocks and got scraped up and got a big...
	It's a swollen area on her leg, but it's not broken, but she's still in a great deal of pain.
	So I'd appreciate it if you keep her in your prayers.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, I have a question on DLive from Fuzz Meister.
	Is RFK Jr.
	a controlled op?
	I just take things policy by policy.
	I can't say definitively whether anybody is.
	We just look at things that they do and say one by one.
	As I've said in the past, and I've got a lot of people who will send me a lot of positive news about RFK Jr., and they like him.
	And as I said last week, typically for somebody who's running as a Democrat, I can't find anything that I agree with them on.
	But I agree with several things that RFKJ says.
	Who knows what he would do if he were president.
	I agreed with a lot of things that Trump said in 2016.
	I thought he deserved a shot.
	But now we know what he did.
	So, end of story. As far as I'm concerned with Trump.
	And I would say, when you look at the totality of what Trump said and what he did, I would say that he is controlled opposition.
	But I don't know about RFKJ. As I said, I think he's an old-style Democrat.
	He believes...
	And climate change, man-made climate change, which makes them very dangerous.
	And he also believes that government has a solution to things.
	And he put out the idea that the government ought to help people as the price of houses have exploded, as interest rates have exploded, that the government should help people to purchase a home.
	Well, again, that is doubling down on the initial problems of the government, right?
	The government is the one creating inflation.
	The government, or I should say the Federal Reserve, which is not the government, but they kowtow to the Federal Reserve anyway.
	But it's the Federal Reserve that is arbitrarily raising interest rates for their own personal agenda and that type of thing.
	And so it seems to me like you need to address these root causes rather than adding another layer of government bandages on top of things.
	And so I think he is, in that sense, an old-style FDR Democrat, which is dangerous as well.
	But I do agree with him on the war and peace issues.
	He's been very good on that.
	And Gerald Slenty loves him because of that.
	But, you know, it even gave Gerald a take back when R.K. Jr.
	started talking about... You know, opposing the racial set-asides and things like that.
	Supreme Court made that determination that, no, you're going to treat everybody according to merit.
	And RFK Jr. had a problem with that.
	That's what I'm saying. He's an old-style Democrat.
	And so, I don't know about that.
	I would just say, you know, if you're worried about controlled opposition, Knights of Storm has done a great job of putting together a community of like-minded people.
	We're going to tell you, you know, tell it like it is.
	And so, if you want to see a program listing of A lot of different people who have a lot of different programming.
	Knights of the Storm is a great place to take a look.
	Jason, Angry Tiger have done a really good job of establishing a community there.
	And so really to appreciate what they do and also their focus on other people because it's bigger than just what they do.
	They're trying to get the truth out, which is what we all should be trying to do.
	Well, we're talking about money.
	We've got an analyst who is working for Bank of America, Michael Hartnett.
	Rather than spying on people, he's actually doing some financial analysis, historical analysis.
	He says the biggest picture segment...
	Of this latest weekly flow show, the 10-year U.S. Treasury is on course for a third consecutive loss.
	And that has not occurred in the 250-year history of the U.S. Republic since 1787.
	Two years before the Bill of Rights.
	I mean, you know, and Constitution.
	That is...
	You know, they're operating under the Articles of Confederation.
	And so this is a pretty amazing historical precedent, the fact that there's been the Treasury bills have gone for a third consecutive loss.
	And in those early days, I mean, they were still suffering under the legacy of the Continental, the worthless paper money that they had at the time.
	And so now we understand that the paper money here is worthless as well.
	An interesting story, as a matter of fact, it was on Zero Hedge this weekend.
	An analyst with Credit Suisse and also with a SAC Capital Portfolio Manager.
	His name is Nick Colas.
	And his family came to America in the 1960s as things were happening.
	Fidel Castro took over.
	And so they got out of Cuba and came to America.
	In 1960, he said his family came to America with only $200 in a suitcase.
	And as part of this bigger program, he's not just somebody who focuses on gold, by the way.
	Just to put this in context...
	In this YouTube video that Zero Hedge is talking about, he opined on topics like his three cardinal rules of investing, how to use VIX to trade smarter, and the best way to value Tesla.
	And as part of this, he also touched on gold.
	And what he said was, when they escaped Castro's Cuba, they came with only $200 in a suitcase.
	Okay. After scrambling to land on their feet, his father began buying gold coins on business trips to Europe when it was $35 to $37 an ounce.
	Now, why does he mention that, business trips to Europe?
	Because if you remember, as Tony Arderman has always talked about, they had prohibited buying gold in the United States.
	And so when he would travel on business trips to Europe, that's when he would buy gold.
	So he viewed gold as a long-term store of value, he said of his father.
	And then in 1971, Nixon took the U.S. dollar off the gold standard, and prices began to rise.
	In the late 1970s, inflation really took over as a big investment theme, and the price of gold was going up even further.
	And of course, it still wasn't legal to get it in the United States, not until Gerald Ford, right after Nixon, made it legal.
	In 1974, gold soared from its $35 valuation in the 1960s to $600 an ounce by 1980.
	I thought that it went up to like $800 an ounce.
	That's the way I remember it. But I don't know.
	I didn't own any gold at the time, unfortunately.
	But I thought it got up to $800.
	While the S&P 500 has grown roughly 13% a year over the last decade, when one looks outside U.S. borders, gold's fifth annual compounded growth begins to look quite impressive.
	So, S&P's gone 13% a year, but gold has gone up 5% a year, and it seems to me like it's a lot less of a risk.
	By the way, just maybe what he was saying, it might have gotten up to...
	800 after 1980, because it still kept running up a little bit after that.
	But the bottom line of his argument was, central banks love gold.
	According to the World Gold Council, Colas said, 25% demand for gold has come from central banks, primarily China, Russia, Turkey, India.
	Why? Why? Well, owning gold is like owning the dollar plus the volatility of the underlying assets, he said.
	But it also offers the central bank's immunity to sanctions and confiscation during geopolitical upheavals.
	This is the key reason why I think we need to own it.
	Because we've already seen, this is not something they just, that the Biden administration or the Trump administration does to other countries.
	We've seen these globalists like Trudeau do this to their own people, freeze their bank accounts and do all the rest of this stuff.
	We see this happening in the UK, Nigel Farage, and many others.
	It's begun with PayPal shutting people down and saying, you know, we may in the future charge you $2,500 for each time that we believe that you said the wrong thing, but we're going to close your account.
	Well, they didn't do that to me in terms of the $2,500 charge, but they closed my account back in May of 2021.
	Five months after we started this show.
	PayPal and Venmo never would give me an explanation.
	When that was brought up in the UK, because it came after the Daily Skeptic people, they pulled it back and said, well, I don't know how that got in there.
	Did you put that in there? I didn't put that clause in there.
	I don't know how that got in.
	Seriously? Seriously?
	You got legal language and your terms of service, and you don't know how that got in there?
	Somebody just made this up at a low level?
	Completely absurd.
	And then, of course, when everybody stopped looking at them, they put it back in.
	Just to prove that they were lying.
	And so, meanwhile, you've got Nigel Farage and now other people getting purged out of their bank accounts.
	You have Bank of America...
	As I said, well, we're going to shut down the bank account of a Christian charity because they're sending money to Uganda.
	Really? What is it about Uganda?
	Well, Uganda's passed these laws.
	Making homosexuality illegal.
	And if you do homosexual rape of a minor, you can get the death penalty.
	So, Bank of America has determined that you can't send money to Uganda because of the government's policy.
	A Christian charity that's set up to give money to poor people in Uganda is going to lose their bank account.
	See, they're making these determinations about who gets to keep a bank account.
	So these types of sanctions and confiscations, what they're angling for with the central bank digital currency and all the rest of these types of controls, even if they don't have central bank digital currency, they're already doing this through their surrogates, the big banks.
	The big banks are going to do what the government wants because the government is their customer.
	You are not their customer.
	It's just like social media and all the rest of it.
	They want to please the government, and they don't care what you want.
	NASCAR doesn't care what you want.
	They're going to shove ESG down your throat.
	And on and on, you know, whether you're talking about Bud Light or the rest of it.
	They want to please the government.
	Same thing is true of the car companies.
	If they please the government, they're going to be one of the few companies that's going to be allowed to exist.
	This is kind of crony capitalism, kind of economic fascism that you see in China, and it's coming to our country as well.
	So they don't care what you want.
	You're not their customer. The government is their customer for their long-term survival.
	And so for those reasons, you need to be investing in gold as a secondary thing, so they can't confiscate it, so they can't sanction you.
	We're pretty bullish on gold for the next five to ten years, he said.
	Have good underlying demand, good incremental demand from central banks as well.
	But gold is just natural money.
	The fiat stuff is fake.
	Michael Meharry. Gold is nature's money.
	It absolutely is. By the way, DavidKnight.gold is what Tony has set up to take you to Wise Wolf Gold.
	Tony will sell you gold or silver and any denomination.
	Of course, if you want to set up on a regular savings plan, he's got that as well.
	His wolf pack, you know, you can just do it.
	Without thinking about it and gradually accumulate stuff is just kind of a savings plan.
	Kind of the same type of thing this guy's father did, Kola's father did, when he escaped from Cuba with only $200.
	And then he became very wealthy because he gradually started saving money and putting it into something that was absolutely real.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Alright, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about some of the entertainment stuff that happened over the weekend.
	Truly was amazing. We saw Oliver Anthony, and I forget what his actual name is.
	That's his stage name. That's fine.
	A lot of people have stage names.
	You know, John Wayne's first name was Marion.
	I can't understand why you would change it.
	You know, that was pretty much a standard thing.
	But he went on with Joe Rogan, the guy who wrote and sang Richmond, North of Richmond.
	And he is right.
	He said he was very different from the video that he put up where he was saying, look, the Republicans asked me if they could play an excerpt of that song for the debate.
	I said, yeah, but I didn't really like the way they use it because there was no sense that I was talking about them, you know, and and the only person who really responded to that question was DeSantis.
	And he made it about Biden.
	He goes, no, I'm not Republican or Democrat.
	And they're all doing the same thing to a people.
	And so he got in a back and forth with Joe Rogan.
	And I think one of the things that was very interesting about it was the fact that he brought up porn to Joe Rogan and alcohol.
	And I want you to hear what Joe Rogan said in response.
	In that business? I believe it's one-third of internet traffic worldwide or something bonkers like that.
	Yeah. Isn't it something like that?
	It should be more.
	I don't know. Let's find out what it is.
	What's the percentage? And everybody's like, I don't know where it's coming from.
	It's not me. I've never even seen one of these films.
	That stuff's terrible for people.
	I, um... It's terrible for some people.
	I gave that up. I think it's like Adderall.
	Some people can handle it. That is one thing I had to give up.
	Yeah, because it's... I don't know.
	It does disconnect you from reality in many ways.
	I think a lot of the weird perversion we see coming out...
	Now at this point you read about...
	I mean, I even reference some of it in the song, of course, but you read about a lot of the weird things that people are doing that maybe wouldn't have been accepted a hundred years ago.
	I think... People go down these rabbit holes with porn, and they start off with the video with the milkman, and by the end of it, it's like, where did I end?
	It's almost like a drug.
	People have to keep chasing that thrill, and it takes them down very destructive rabbit holes, if you will.
	It definitely can for some people.
	I have no issue with anybody watching it, but I hate to read about some of the things that it does to people.
	It ruins marriages and that kind of thing.
	I don't know. I think a lot of things ruin people.
	I think they also should be legal.
	Sure, yeah. Alcohol ruins people.
	I like the fact that bars are legal.
	Shit, I own a bar. Alcohol is legal.
	I like it. It's not good for everybody, though.
	Some people drink alcohol and they lose their fucking mind.
	And it's not good for them, whether it's genetically or whatever it is.
	They can't have a drink.
	I like a drink. You know, and I support your right to do whatever you want.
	Like, you know...
	I think if cocaine was legal, the same amount of people would probably do it, and it would be real.
	You'd get pure cocaine.
	It'd probably be better. We'd probably have better music.
	Yeah, well, there you go.
	It seems to me like, you know, porn, some people can't handle it.
	Adderall, some people can't handle it.
	Alcohol, some people can't handle it.
	But, you know, Joe can handle it all.
	And of course, that's the same thing that Satan says to you, isn't it?
	Well, you know, some people can't handle those things, but you can.
	Just a little bit. Just a taste.
	You know, it's all it takes. I remember when I grew up in a teetotaling family, and I would say, well, first the man takes a drink, then the drink takes a drink, then the drink takes a man.
	But the issue there is, you know, and again, good for Oliver Anthony for having the guts to tell the truth of how it's like a drug.
	It's like an addiction.
	All of these things, Adderall, alcohol, porn, these are all addictions.
	These are all things that were promised freedom, but they enslave you.
	You become a slave to these things.
	You become a slave to the lusts of this stuff, the sin.
	You become a slave to that sin, that lust.
	And, yeah, some people can handle it, he says.
	Well, you know, the way to approach that is to say, you know, look, alcohol was prohibited.
	They had enough respect for the Constitution to do it legally.
	They had a constitutional amendment, the 18th, to make it illegal, 21st, to make it legal again.
	We don't respect the Constitution.
	And we also understand that this is a spiritual problem, a medical problem.
	It's not a law enforcement problem.
	And by trying to use a hammer on a screw, we have made this a lot worse.
	And we got one tool that we use for everything.
	And that is force from the government.
	And that's not the right solution to this problem.
	You don't have to deny that it's a problem.
	You have to say that this tool that we're using is not the appropriate tool.
	And so I give him credit.
	You know, he shies away from challenging Rogan, and I understand that.
	You know, he was saying in this interview, I was so shy I couldn't do a concert like the one, I don't know what...
	15,000-20,000 people or something he had show up at that concert after his song went big.
	He said, I didn't have the kind of confidence where I could do something like that before he became a Christian.
	And he did.
	Because that kind of turned him away, I guess, from looking at himself.
	I don't know what changed, but he said that was something that changed about it.
	But I understand that he may still shy away from going head-to-head with Joe Rogan.
	A lot of people would be concerned about that.
	But Joe Rogan pushes a lot of stuff, a lot of garbage to people.
	He pushes hallucinogenic mushrooms to people as well.
	You don't want to take any advice from Joe Rogan, quite frankly.
	What Oliver Anthony said, it's almost like a drug.
	People keep chasing that thrill.
	Takes them down destructive rabbit holes.
	Ruins marriages.
	Ruins people.
	It gets them focused on, it gets them where they can't relate to people as a real person, in a sense.
	And so he also talked about how he went on a run with SSRIs.
	And the side effects were more powerful than any of the benefits.
	uh, As far as I could tell, he did not talk about the murder-suicide aspects of SSRIs, but just in general, the idea that we would seek to try to address all of our problems with a pill.
	Rather than looking at some of the underlying issues.
	And he talked about a relative who eats anything that he wants.
	And even though he's got high blood pressure and diabetes, it doesn't affect his behavior.
	He just takes more drugs from the pharmaceutical companies.
	So he seems like he's got his head on straight with this.
	But, you know, when you look at also as part of the interview, it went on for like two hours, evidently.
	And at one point, he read Proverbs to Joe Rogan.
	And this I saw as a comment because one of the people that's in the band, Christian rock band or something, Skillet, John Cooper, as you know what that is, right?
	Right. He responded to this because as Oliver Anthony read Proverbs to Joe Rogan, Joe Rogan's response was, that's pretty effing profound, right?
	That's Joe Rogan's response to everything, right?
	John Cooper says, well, I wouldn't exactly put it like that, but it is profound because when we read the Bible, it's not just words that some really super old people wrote.
	It's words that were breathed out by God himself.
	Instructions for how to live from God, how to love your neighbor, how to treat people who do not treat you well, how to treat your wife, how to parent your kids, and how to work hard.
	And the Bible is a word of life.
	John Cooper, he's absolutely right.
	He then argued that the progressive worldview is always looking for its answers somewhere in the future, or the here and now, right?
	We're progressing toward it rather than looking backward toward wisdom.
	It believes a progressive view that people that came before us were retrograde.
	They're old.
	They didn't know what they were doing.
	As a matter of fact, I think one of the most amazing experiences I had with somebody over this particular issue was a friend of Karen and her twin brother from high school came down to visit us when we were living in North Carolina.
	And I said something, somehow, you know, I don't know.
	I don't know why somebody would interject politics into a discussion like that.
	Maybe it was me. I can't help it.
	But I said something about Thomas Jefferson.
	I didn't get real political, right?
	It wasn't left-right, but it was Thomas Jefferson.
	And his response was, Jefferson didn't know anything.
	He wouldn't even be able to drive a car today.
	I was like, what? I was speechless at the stupidity of that remark.
	You know, it was JFK addressing a group of scientists, I think, award-winning scientists like Nobel Prize winners and that type of thing.
	He says, this is the most brainpower that's been in the White House since Thomas Jefferson dined alone.
	It's like, you think that's your standard?
	You know, being able to drive a car?
	Has he been on the roads?
	Has he noticed what the low qualifications are for people being able to have a driver's permit or to be on the road?
	I mean, again, it's ridiculous.
	But people think that way.
	They look at this and they say, well, we don't want to hear from these people.
	We want to reject the past.
	There's no reason for the warning labels that we have on things.
	You know, that sign that says, be careful.
	Don't go down this path.
	It could be because it just goes straight off the ledge.
	We don't care about these signs.
	It's put there by somebody before us.
	We don't care. We don't want to look at any of the warning signs.
	We don't want to look at any of the experience of other people.
	We're going to figure it all out ourselves because we're so much smarter than they are.
	Because, see, I've got a computer in my pocket.
	My computer in your pocket is making you dumber, not smarter.
	But what we're talking about, the porn stuff, this also broke over the weekend.
	And that is... So details published by the BBC in a group that was, this is also part of a documentary that they're doing on Andrew Tate.
	They got encrypted telegram messages sent over a period of about a year, March 2019 to April 2020.
	Forty-five potential trafficking victims could be identified.
	And I think one of the things that was truly amazing, you know, when we look at this, it's like, yes, Oliver Anthony was right.
	There are, you know, porn use is awful for people.
	But, you know, how the porn is made, destroying lives on both sides of this financial transaction, quite frankly.
	Members of Andrew Tate's war room group discuss techniques on how to groom women into online sex, including by using violence and incrementally isolating them from their friends and family.
	And I talk about this because it's got a lot of parallels to what our government schools are doing to our kids, quite frankly.
	You cut them off from their support.
	You cut them off from their family and that type of thing, right?
	Don't tell the parents.
	Classic grooming.
	And in the case of Tate's War Room, the war room is this thing that you pay $8,000 a year.
	$8,000 a year to join.
	And you have access to, quote, thousands of professionals from around the world who encourage personal responsibility and accountability, the importance of taking ownership of your choices and actions.
	And yet, when they saw these leaked emails where they were talking about How to groom women into sex work through their PhD course.
	They call that the Pimpin' Hoes degree.
	The group's leading generals allegedly teach members how to seduce women, emotionally manipulate them, and pressure them into doing pornography while taking the majority of the money that they make, like a pimp.
	Why is this guy celebrated by Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, and other people like that?
	This is the right side.
	We're going to look at the left side here coming up out of Hollywood here.
	But one guy out of Chicago, his name is Miles Sonkin, used the alias Iggy Simmelweis.
	And he described a series, quote, series of gradual steps to remove her entire support structure from her life.
	Isolate them. This is classic grooming.
	This is what is being done, by the way, to your kids in school, if you put them in a government school.
	And they start grooming them for this transgender stuff.
	Then, so they isolate them, remove them from their entire support structure, then we punish her for a transgression, real or imagined.
	This is also what is done in the schools.
	Do you use their pronouns?
	Do you use their own pronouns? And on and on, all these imaginary transgressions.
	You triggered somebody with the language that you used, or whatever.
	Beating these people into submission, isolating them from their parents and their family and their friends.
	Leaving her family's home, apartment, town, or country.
	And then, eventually, we turn her into...
	Getting us girls, you know, like Jeffrey Epstein did with Maxine Giswell, you know, gets her to recruit the girls.
	Takes their guard down because this is another woman, right?
	This just isn't just a guy.
	And then we escalate, escalate, escalate, he says.
	Isolating her from her family or friends is the kindest thing you can do for her if you are taking responsibility for having the sole authority over her.
	Does this sound like a K-12 teacher?
	I'm isolating these kids from the parents for their own protection.
	I know what's best for this kid, and I'm going to do a better job of this.
	It's what the Gay Men's Choir in San Francisco was singing about.
	Yes, you're right. We are coming for your kids, and we're going to make them better than you would ever make them because we know what they really need.
	This is the classic grooming.
	And so, when you look at how this thing is shaking out, there's really not a whole lot of difference between the left and right.
	It's just kind of what they focus on.
	A spokesperson responded to this BBC report in the documentary by saying it's, quote, another brazen attempt to present a one-sided, unverified allegations against him.
	Well, I don't really know.
	That's a non-response, I guess.
	Really? Don't you want to respond to those things that are being done and the testimony of a couple of women that talked to these people as well as the text messages that they got?
	What is your explanation for that?
	Oh, well, you're just like Fauci.
	That ain't the whole story here.
	There's some other stuff. In the documentary, you meet a follower who says that he won't believe the allegations against Tate until he admits to them himself.
	Why do you think he has such power over these young men?
	I asked the BBC to this documentary.
	I said, well, people tend to look at Andrew Tate as a political thing, but it's actually closer to a spiritual thing.
	Now we've moved from the LGBT type of grooming of kids in schools to what you see happening with Trump, isn't it?
	Well, you know, Tate is good because he likes Trump, and it doesn't really matter what he does to women.
	They deserve that anyway, right?
	As long as they're adults, you can do anything you want to people, right?
	We draw the line, we conservatives draw the line at kids, right?
	But women are fair game.
	Is that really it? He says it's actually closer to a spiritual thing.
	These people see Andrew Tate as a messiah-like figure who has saved them from the depths of whatever insecurity they have, and he's their key to happiness and to saving society.
	Just like Trump. The Messiah-like figure of Trump.
	And his media hanger-ons, right?
	Who promote him.
	That type of thing. Yeah, that's the way we get into this situation.
	You posit that Iggy Simmelweis, a war room general, might actually be the mastermind behind this whole operation?
	I said, yeah, and what kind of a person, they said, creates an entire society of men and then encourages them to traffic women and send images back of those trafficked women?
	Is it all just some grand operatic fetish of Iggy's?
	And they said, well, yeah, he leaves all these breadcrumbs about where he's coming from.
	He makes references on his Twitter and in messages about a book that The Scarlet Citadel by Robert Howard.
	In that book, there's a wizard who traffics screaming girl slaves and wears a ring identical to the one that Iggy gets his war room members to wear.
	There has to be a degree of hubris for him to lace his tweets with these subtle references to him being the gatekeeper of the Scarlet Citadel.
	I'm sure in some ways that he wants people to work it out because he's probably quite impressed with what he thinks he's achieved.
	Iggy is the old-school artist nerd who is into dungeons and dragons and fantasies, and he fancies himself as a dark wizard.
	You know, it has a lot of impact on a lot of people.
	You know, we look at the story last week about a young teenage boy, not graduated from high school yet, And he is on his phone, and he gets this text message of some girl that he met online, he thought. And she sends him, you know, they get, you know, real flirty.
	She sends him some pictures of herself, nude and compromised positions, and gets him to respond the same way.
	Turns out it's not a woman at all.
	It was this Nigerian group of people, and then they use that to blackmail him.
	They said, now you're going to do what we tell you to do.
	Or we're going to show those initial pictures to all these people that we've pulled your contact list off of your phone, including your mother.
	And they couldn't figure out why their young son got the dad's gun and shot himself.
	It took them several months to figure that out.
	You know, when we look at what is happening with us and the way they're playing with people's lives, it just disgusts me.
	To see this kind of stuff, like Andrew Tate and what we're going to be talking about here with Hollywood.
	And I said, like Trump, Tate's fans have become even more invested and loyal to him and more antagonistic of anybody who reports on what he does.
	You know, they circle the wagons.
	You know, I can't believe this guy would ever do anything wrong.
	Because we've invested in him.
	We know that he has the answers to life.
	No, he doesn't. The Bible has the answers to life, not Andrew Tate.
	It doesn't cost $8,000 a year.
	You get your pew Bible for free.
	Most churches will hand it to you if you walk in.
	It's been quite shocking to see how they've gone from people who supported someone on the internet to people who literally believe this man is a messiah who's going to save civilization.
	And it's the same reason you've got people like Tucker and Alex.
	Supporting Andrew Tate, just like they do Trump.
	They want the MAGA people is a big audience.
	It's a mega audience, and they can get mega bucks for pushing this stuff.
	And he is part of that.
	They said, has Tate himself changed during this time?
	Well, he said his marketing team has intentionally tried to portray him as more of a religious man.
	Isn't that amazing?
	And that is something else that we have seen, isn't it?
	As things get darker and darker for these people, you start seeing more and more God talk from them, don't you?
	These alternative media people, like Alex and others.
	And then let's take a look at what Hollywood is doing.
	This new film that has previewed in the Venice Film Festival, And again, these film festivals, especially Venice, you know, con film festivals the same way, but especially in Venice, they have just the most repulsive stuff.
	Even these people who are film critics and they've seen everything and movie stars who've seen everything, they go to these things and, you know, they're showing these pictures and...
	They come out vomiting.
	I mean, literally vomiting from some of these pictures they've had in the last few years.
	And this, they love this picture.
	This is from a Greek director, and it involves Emma Stone.
	They refer to it, Breitbart News, a feminist Frankenstein.
	Emma Stone wows Venice as a sex-mad, reanimated corpse with an infant's brain.
	This is the pedo-sex fantasies of the leftists in Hollywood, and it combines so many different things.
	It combines abortion.
	It combines pedophilia.
	It combines feminism and gender wars, which is what they really love about it.
	But it also has those other things that you tick off on there as well.
	Emma Stone stars as a sexually voracious, reanimated corpse with the mind of a child.
	You see? And as I was saying before about Uganda, you know, the death penalty that they give is, they call it aggravated homosexuality.
	People say, well, what is aggravated homosexuality?
	No, that is, you know, homosexual rape of a child or of somebody who's mentally impaired.
	And that's the way that Emma Stone is portrayed in this movie, Poor Things.
	As a childlike mind, you can see in the trailer, she throws herself off of a cliff.
	She is found by this mad scientist who then reanimates her, but he uses the brain of her unborn child and puts that in her.
	So she's born with the mind of a child, but the adult body of a woman.
	And then they make it all about sex because this is their pedophile fantasy.
	Finding somebody who's mentally impaired or finding a child.
	And, you know, this virginal type of thing that they do, this is part of their sickness.
	And the film critics love it.
	They gave it 100%.
	100%.
	Of course, audiences haven't seen it.
	I think the audiences are going to have a different opinion of this.
	I hope so. I hope we haven't gotten to the point of the film critics out there.
	It features some of the most explicit sex ever seen in an A-list Hollywood film as her naive character discovers and very much enjoys her sexuality.
	The director says the character has no shame and Emma had to have no shame about her body, her nudity, or engaging in those scenes.
	Shameless. Shameless.
	That pretty much describes Hollywood.
	She understood it right away.
	And so then it gets into the feminist aspect of it.
	So that's the pedophilia aspect of it, the molester mindset that people can watch this and identify with.
	Then the film skewers the way men try and fail to control the innocent Bella.
	That's her name. Triggering bursts of spontaneous applause and riotous laughter from the audience in Venice.
	Again, you know, you feed this, you turn this around, And now the woman who eventually was portrayed as a victim now becomes the dominant one in all of this.
	They love that. Poor Things is an early favorite among 23 movies competing for the top prize to be awarded on September the 9th at this Venice Festival.
	I remember when it was the Cannes Film Festival in 2021, and you had these people show up, and they were very angry about the fact that they had to take a COVID test.
	And for these celebrities, they would not submit them to the indignity of having a swab ramrodded up their nose to their brain.
	Instead, they had them spit into a container and they thought that was disgusting.
	And I said at the time, you think that's disgusting.
	You should see what they're playing inside the movie theater.
	That'll make you want to throw up.
	But, you know, and Macron said, well, you know, we're going to have to have a vaccine passport in two months.
	You're going to need to have a vaccine passport.
	In order to travel anywhere. But they had delayed it because they wanted to be able to have the Cannes Film Festival.
	You know, these people get to do whatever they wish and they get a pass for everything because really what they are doing in terms of the content that they're putting out.
	This is high-level propaganda.
	The highest level of propaganda.
	You know, the spiritual corruption propaganda.
	And, you know, it's amazing to hear Tucker Carlson Talk about how, oh yeah, we've got all these people, you know, they work for the CIA, and all these people are disinformation agents and everything.
	It's like, his dad worked for Voice of America, CIA propaganda arm, all of his life, practically.
	And Tucker wanted to be in the CIA. I think probably he is serving them.
	But anyway, it set an incredible new record, says Digital...
	They said massive 100% on Rotten Tomatoes because, again, only film critics have seen it.
	I didn't look on Rotten Tomatoes to see how many people, you know, was it five people rated it, got 100%.
	But again, no audiences have seen this yet.
	Mark Ruffalo is also in it, as well as William Dafoe, who plays the mad scientist.
	Mark Ruffalo is the suitor of hers.
	But again, what's not to like about this?
	We got suicide.
	We got abortion.
	We got baby parts being repurposed like Fauci and the NIH. We've got sex with a mentally impaired childlike person.
	We have pornography.
	We have feminist gender wars.
	What's not to love about this film?
	I mean, it perfectly embodies everything that we should all like.
	And if we watch this garbage coming out of Hollywood, yeah, we'll get drawn into that.
	Like Oliver Anthony said, getting really weird stuff.
	Look at the films. Look at how weird they've got.
	Because you've always got to do something else to offend people.
	Cannibalism, this type of stuff.
	You've always got to get the next shock people.
	You've got to shock people.
	We get dulled to these ordinary things.
	And then we've got to have the next thing.
	And then we get dulled to that.
	We've got to have the next bigger fixes.
	It is very much like drug addiction.
	Always looking for that next thrill.
	A woman says her daughter was sex trafficked after the school hid her gender transition and removed her from the family.
	See how this all works?
	Just like what Andrew Tate does.
	Michelle Blair Biological grandmother and adoptive mother of a 16-year-old girl, Sage, filed a lawsuit.
	She said Sage has a history of mental health issues and early childhood trauma.
	She then got under the control and manipulation of some school employees in Virginia.
	They started changing her name and pronouns, telling her to use the boys' bathroom.
	I mean, isn't this like Poor Things, the movie?
	But this is real life.
	She was being verbally, physically, sexually harassed, all constant threats of rape from the male students.
	Despite this, the school still encouraged her to use the boys' bathroom.
	Among the defendants named in the lawsuit are two counselors and the Maryland public defender.
	According to the lawsuit, these two counselors played a key role in deliberately concealing Sage's transition, which they were pushing, while engaging in inappropriate psychotherapy methods to facilitate Sage's belief that she was a boy.
	This is something that is also very common.
	There was... So I said, you know, when I put together some of the music, I get samples from various sources.
	One of them that I liked a lot was Spitfire Libraries out of the UK. And one of the co-founders of that company was pushed out after he got on and said, you've got to be careful about what they're doing to kids now.
	He says, this is coming to your doorstep.
	And if you've got a child with autism, he said, it's already on your doorstep.
	Because, you see, they're going to, just like the movie, Poor Things, they're going to go to those who have a childlike innocence, and they're going to manipulate them, they're going to separate them from the family and all the rest.
	And for telling the truth about that, he was kicked out of the company that he co-founded.
	Sage was kidnapped, drugged, and raped by an adult male who later drove her to Washington, where she was left with two brothers who drugged and raped her again before driving her to Maryland, where she was then left with a registered sex offender who kept her in a locked room only to be trafficked to other men.
	Maybe these guys got the pimp and hoe degrees from Andrew Tate, you think?
	Certainly sounds like it.
	The law enforcement rescued her on September 2, 2021.
	The adoptive mother, the biological grandmother of hers, was not allowed to take her home because...
	The public defender, and they have a Freudian slip in this article, they call this person the public offender.
	Yeah, that's what this person was, and so much a defender.
	The public defender alleged that there was neglect at home and proved it.
	They had the child on Zoom, and in the courtroom, she came up on the big Zoom screen, she said, I called her name, and I said, I love you, Sage.
	And she replied, I love you, Nana.
	And that was it. The public defender shut down the Zoom and convinced the judge that I was abusive because they didn't call her by her boy name.
	And the judge went along with that.
	And then with that, public defenders and the assistance of these two counselors in school, they convinced the judge to put the child in the custody of the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services, where she was housed with high-risk adolescent males.
	Males. But this child, who had been through all this kidnapping and rape and everything, puts the kid in there with a bunch of males, who then again sexually assaulted her.
	A month later, she escaped, fled to Texas to meet somebody she'd met online, who she believed was 16, but the person turned out to be another sex trafficker.
	By this time, Texas authorities were able to intervene, and then the ones in Texas gave her back to her mother.
	Unlike the ones in Maryland.
	And she has now been there after having been away from home for over a year.
	And so the woman who is now suing these people said all this could have been avoided if the school had informed me of what was going on instead of keeping me in the dark.
	Sage would not have now a lifetime complex PTSD diagnosis that she'll struggle with for the rest of her life.
	She's had a history of mental health issues from early childhood trauma.
	And that was exploited by these school counselors and by these people who trafficked her and raped her.
	This is the way this operates.
	And so, to kind of close this out, CNN says that it is anti-gay to prosecute men having sex with 12-year-olds.
	CNN says it's anti-gay to prosecute them.
	And, of course, that's what I talked about earlier.
	You know, Bank of America, we're not going to let this...
	We're going to shut down the account of this Christian charity because they're sending some money to Uganda.
	And Uganda has these new laws.
	CNN writes, this act that was signed into law in May...
	Outlaws gay marriage in Uganda, punishes same-sex acts with life imprisonment.
	It has been decades since Uganda last carried out an execution, but its longtime president had threatened in 2018 to resume state assent for capital punishment.
	It seeks to criminalize what is often consensual conduct between adults, but that is not what this death penalty is about.
	And that's not what these particular cases are.
	A man who was arrested in Saroti is the second person to be charged with a capital offense in Uganda since the law passed in May.
	Another man was charged with aggregated homosexuality last month in eastern Uganda for allegedly performing a sexual act with a child aged 12 of the same sex.
	And this is reported by CNN, but they present this as an anti-gay law.
	The article says that one man was charged with a sexual act with a child aged 12 of the same sex.
	The other man charged was performing unlawful sexual intercourse with a man aged 41 who had a disability.
	And yet, the banks, Bank of America, and our government, and CNN, and Hollywood, A-list stars, want you to see this portrayed.
	As an empowering thing.
	Because Emma Stone is doing it.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	And now, the David Nutt Show.
	Travis wrote to me, he said, the comedian Sam Hyde, who always gets reported as a mass shooter and other things, and as the ghost of Kiev, Anyway, he did a fake TED Talk called the 2070 Paradigm Shift.
	One joke he made in it was by then we would have, quote, state-enforced homosexuality.
	Travis says we got there a bit early, didn't we?
	Yeah, yeah. State and corporate-enforced homosexuality.
	That's the bottom line.
	Well, you know, I think it's necessary for us to look at this dark stuff.
	We can't run from it.
	We have to know what we're up against.
	We also have to understand, Rebel News put together a short documentary.
	I'm not going to play it all because it's about 20 minutes long, but I would recommend that you go to Rebel News and take a look at Pastor Tim Stevens.
	I'm talking about the fact he's now been acquitted.
	He was arrested at least twice, just like Pastor Arter Pulaski and James Coates and others for violating these arbitrary rules that were out there.
	And he has now beaten these charges.
	On a technicality, the fundamental principle, however, they have held by letting him off on a technicality.
	But I saw this, and I retweeted it yesterday on my Twitter feed.
	And I said, you know, we have a dying world.
	It is so hungry for what authentic Christians like this pastor have.
	What does he have? He's got courage.
	He's got integrity. He's got convictions.
	And, you know, that is what we don't see.
	And, of course, those are just fringe benefits, frankly.
	You know, what he has that he didn't earn is a gift of Christ.
	And so, liberty, as I said, is just a fringe benefit of this stuff.
	A civil society is just a fringe benefit of this.
	You know, we don't want to pursue those things and miss the core thing.
	That gives us that and even gives us peace in difficult circumstances because he was arrested in front of his family.
	He spent quite a bit of time in jail.
	I think he was in for a couple of months, weeks.
	Two brutal arrests, spending weeks behind bars.
	And he kept his church open, church doors open during COVID-19.
	James Coates was also arrested.
	One of the things that he said in the final address to his congregation, final sermon before they hauled him off to jail.
	He said, I wish I had studied history more, especially church history of this.
	And he says, I think we need to focus on that a bit more in the future.
	And this is what it looks like.
	When they came and arrested him outside the church, With all of his young family there.
	And again, how do these police officers, how do they sleep at night?
	How are they going to be remembered?
	What are they going to tell their children and their grandchildren that they did during the COVID wars?
	That's different. Injustice!
	Injustice! Yeah, I think what a lot of Canadians realized in the last few years is that our most fundamental freedoms actually come second place in our Constitution, in our Charter.
	Nothing sharp, nothing basically at all.
	There's nothing we need to worry about.
	Bye, Daddy!
	It was his kid, watching him being taken away for the crime of having a church.
	And there's that cop with a mask on his face.
	Shamed of it. Also, I know other regions in the country, like in Ontario, Agreed that our fundamental freedoms to assemble, to gather, to worship, that those were, in fact, they were impinged.
	They were violated by the government.
	But, of course, that first section of our charter says, you know, the government can suppress our freedoms if it's demonstrably justified.
	And there is no burden of proof upon Dina Hinshaw or anybody else to justify their decisions.
	And so that's really what is a shame about all of this, is...
	It's the admission that your rights were violated.
	However, the government can do that.
	Yeah, that's from Rebel News.
	Excellent documentary, and it goes on for quite some time after that.
	As a matter of fact, he said so many people watched the video.
	So many people saw Pastor Tim's unshakable convictions and his authentic Christian witness that, as with many churches that resisted the lockdown, He saw attendance at the church that he had there skyrocket.
	Precisely, his authorities tried to shut him down because people are trying to look for somebody that really believes what they have to say.
	And, you know, his witness.
	Remember, you know, when we talk about the term martyr, that's been co-opted by Muslim terrorists who do suicide bombings.
	But the only thing that that has in common With the martyrs of Christendom is death.
	Because the martyr was Greek word for witness.
	And the Christian martyrs were people who would, under penalty of death, refuse to denounce or to deny what they had seen firsthand.
	And they refused to...
	That was the first group of martyrs that happened.
	And of course, after that...
	Others who did not kill somebody, but they would die rather than recounting what they had witnessed or what they had known or what they had experienced.
	The recent acquittal of all remaining charges against him and his church, the ruling determined that the health orders under which Tim Stevens had been charged were not valid, and that based on a technicality, the Public Health Act had been breached.
	And that's what is also disappointing about this.
	The fact that this is not upholding the fact that Canadians have rights.
	They have a charter of rights.
	And yet, as you heard him say, the chart of rights, it says at the top, well, these can be abridged if it's inconvenient.
	Well, if you can take that away if it's inconvenient, and if it's more expedient for you to just ignore them, they don't exist.
	And unfortunately, the judge refused to speak on that central issue.
	Instead, they said, well, on a technicality, a legal technicality, we're going to let you go, but, you know, we're going to let this principle stand.
	And that's really where we are right now.
	We've got to understand that this usurpation, this tyrannical usurpation of power, by every political party, by Republicans and Democrats, both in the United States, but by every political party and every country, all following the global agenda, you don't think we have global governance?
	Where were you in 2020?
	That was global governance demonstrated to us.
	They were all marching in lockstep, all of them saying, well, in two months we're going to do...
	Here's what I told you I was going to do two months ago.
	Now, in two months we're going to do this next thing.
	They're not responding to any epidemic.
	There was no epidemic.
	Nobody was dying when Trump locked us down.
	All of this was following the orders, as we saw implemented in China first, but just following the orders...
	Of the UN and the CIA that have been practicing these germ games for 20 years.
	So he shared his disappointment in the fact that the ruling acknowledged that fundamental rights were trampled, but that it was apparently acceptable because of the so-called pandemic.
	He says he'll be taking legal action against those who unlawfully imprisoned him, as his first arrest resulted from an injunction that did not apply to him.
	In addition to being arrested twice and imprisoned without basis, and he'll be represented in Canada by an organization called the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms.
	I talked to them when they were defending James Coates.
	And it's a good organization there.
	And the next person up for a trial in Canada is Tamara Litch, who took the lead role in the Freedom Convoy.
	She is set to go to court this month to see what happens there.
	It truly is amazing, but it is instructional for us.
	We know what is coming. And we also know that, again, don't be afraid to stand up for what you believe.
	It may not work out that you're going to win in the end, and it may not work out that you're going to be made whole, but you want to not compromise on these fundamental issues.
	There's going to be people who stand up for this stuff, no matter what happens, that are going to be the heroes of the future.
	Just as we had heroes of the past, people like William Penn, who stood up for what they believed and were imprisoned for it.
	And the jury foreman and the number two guy in the jury who were imprisoned after they let William Penn go, they were thrown in jail by the judge who was angry about that because they nullified the law that they believed was wrong and the penalty that they believed was wrong.
	They nullified that. So the judge threw them in jail.
	William Bushnell was the foreman of the jury.
	I'm just going to let you stay in jail.
	And so then they got a lawyer, and the lawyer said, what body of law did they violate?
	Again, you know, same as this.
	What law was violated here?
	You're the one who violated the law, judge.
	So that established both habeas corpus and jury nullification.
	People have gone to jail.
	People have died for these values.
	And we have a society that's gotten so soft, people cave over pronouns.
	A top psychiatrist says, go back to church, because loneliness is now a major U.S. health threat.
	This is amazing. This is actually something not only a psychologist, but it was also Biden's Surgeon General.
	I would have never thought that Vivek Murthy would have talked about this.
	He says... He suffered loneliness as a child and again as an adult, said Murthy, Biden's Surgeon General.
	He said, it was my wife Alice who stepped in and said, hey, I'm worried about you because you're not reaching out to people.
	You're not socializing with your friends.
	He said about half of adults are struggling with loneliness and even greater numbers of children are.
	This can be surprising given the fact that many young people are frequently connecting with their peers online.
	But that's no substitute for in-person.
	It really isn't.
	And that's why they're talking about this.
	They said this is a problem that is building because people don't want to.
	It was already a big trend.
	And, of course, they accelerated this with all the lockdown with the COVID.
	Nonsense.
	It was already a trend that people were more interested in meeting people online rather than face-to-face.
	Mental health experts like psychiatrist Daniel Amen.
	Amen is his name.
	Amen says, go back to church.
	They believe social media can prove to be addicting and therefore predict the problem will only get worse.
	I actually believe we're on the beginning of a tidal wave of brain and mental health problems in young people, and it's because we're more disconnected than ever before, disconnected from our own families because when people are together, their faces are buried in their gadgets, he said. And so the solution, he says, is to maximize in-person interactions.
	Look, you know, I understand when you look at Zoom church and you can, you know, go around and you can find teachers that you like and that type of thing.
	But, you know, it isn't, you know, what you take away from it as much as it is what you put in.
	And we're guilty of this as anybody, you know, in terms of because I'm so busy not investing time person to person with other people.
	And that is especially true in a church situation.
	You know, a lot of people who are there and they need help, and that's really the way that you need to look at it.
	Not even as the perspective of this thing is like, well, you need human companionship, so this is for you.
	It's for your good. See, everything is about what's good for me.
	Do I like the music? Do I like the teaching?
	Do I like the people there?
	No, as C.S. Lewis says, this lady over here, she's got squeaky boots, and, you know, as he's sitting in the church view, he's going through, and he's like, oh, that person there, look at how they're dressed, and all this, you know, you're nitpicking all these different things, or...
	At least it's being fed to you that way.
	And yet, you know, it's a big part of that for our own good is to give of ourselves more than we take away.
	And that's a big part of what is, you know, it's not just the isolation and the loneliness, but the fact that, you know, we're looking at how am I going to, what's in it for me?
	You know, what am I going to get out of this thing?
	Why would I bother to go there?
	Well, you go there, hopefully, to serve other people.
	Jurors are now being removed because they're Christians.
	This happened in Missouri, and the Attorney General there, Andrew Bailey, has asked the Supreme Court to intervene in a case where people were thrown out simply because they were Christians.
	This is not really the first time we've seen this type of thing.
	But it is an escalating trend when Kermit Gosnell, the guy who was eventually convicted for killing two full-term babies and causing the death of a woman who went there for an abortion because of the shoddy condition of his clinic and the fact that after she started hemorrhaging, the hallways have dilapidated and they couldn't get any gurneys down the hallways to get her out in time.
	So they have said in this, and in that particular case, the reason I brought that up was in that particular case, they said in order for you to be a juror, you have to believe in abortion.
	That is a good thing. It should be legal and that type of thing.
	It's not going to be a trial about abortion.
	This is going to be about Kermit Gosnell.
	And so, they said jurors can be excluded, of course, if their religious views, in fact, make them biased, just like jurors can be excluded if their race or sex, in fact, makes them biased, says the petition from the Missouri Attorney General.
	But this court's precedents make clear that courts cannot assume, based on stereotypes about race or sex, that a person will be biased.
	The same thing could be true of religion.
	He said, we could have a situation where you could categorically strike all Mormons from a contract dispute involving a sports bar because they don't drink alcohol.
	Or to strike Jews from a tort case because this person was operating a motor vehicle on a Saturday.
	I mean, these are important decisions.
	But probably the most important decision is that people be fully informed about what a jury really is about.
	Thank you. Let me tell you, The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?

▲