Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 10, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:11

The David Knight Show - 07/11/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Transcription by CastingWords
	Transcription by CastingWords You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 11th of July, year of our Lord, 2023.
	three. .
	Well, today we're going to begin again with the cluster bombs, because I think there's some very important lessons for us, and we're going to get some more people's reactions with this as well.
	But we're also going to take a look at other technology.
	And, of course, at the state of our own society, the police state, the surveillance state, It's important that we understand the bigger picture here and that we not be herded by these people into accepting the tools and the chains of our slavery because, for example, we're concerned about immigration.
	We can see this happening in other countries, but we're also going to take a look.
	At how deeply Trump was embedded in the CIA lockdown, the pandemic.
	Yes, the CIA was deeply embedded in a great article from Brownstone.
	We're going to show you some of the research.
	It just came out in response to a book of propaganda about the lockdown.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, it is interesting to see how all of this stuff just continues, these threads of stories, and they it is interesting to see how all of this stuff just continues, these As we see, Donald Trump writing his criminal indictments to victory.
	What a country this has become.
	Just amazing. And, of course, there's more of those in the offing.
	As, you know, now there's talk about charges being brought forward, About meetings that were held back in 2020.
	Trump was holding meetings in the Oval Office, if you remember that.
	You had Mike Flynn come in there, and you had the overstocked billionaire come in there, Patrick Byrne.
	And you now have Jack Smith in special prosecution with unlimited amounts of money.
	Now interviewing Rudy Giuliani and others, as we've talked about, he had his proffered statement, got to be queen for a day, actually queen for a second day, he was queen for a day with Donald Trump once, if you remember.
	But it was a meeting that took place in the White House on that Friday, December 18th, 2020.
	The day after I was fired for saying it was all passed and it was nothing but a grift.
	And they'd already had the Electoral College turn in their votes from every state that Monday on the 14th.
	And I said on that Monday the 14th, I said, here's what they could have done to contest this election.
	But they didn't do a single thing.
	Nothing. Nothing.
	They weren't getting anywhere. The courts wasn't necessary for them to do that.
	They could have gone to the state legislatures.
	That would have given them something to work with.
	But they didn't make the case anywhere.
	They didn't make the case in court.
	They didn't make it to the state legislators.
	Where they had a very narrow margin in four states.
	In four states, they had Republican legislatures.
	They didn't do anything about that. Instead, they just used it for grifting.
	And so, yeah.
	And it was not just Trump.
	It was grifting, of course.
	As I said that on Monday, I didn't realize that Alex had been gone over the weekend grifting.
	But, hey, the shoe fits Alex Ware.
	For two consecutive days, Giuliani sat down with investigators for a voluntary interview about a range of topics, including the tumultuous December 2020 meeting that he attended.
	Prosecutors have specifically inquired about three outside Trump advisors who participate in the meeting.
	Former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell.
	One-time National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who, by the way, was pushing transgenderism with a Navy SEAL a decade ago, and CEO of Overstock Patrick Byrne.
	And as this is being reported by Vanity Fair, this is picked up by the Drudge Report, of course, because this is about prosecution of Trump But what they're saying is, as we know from a contemporaneous reporting that happened at the time, topics that were discussed during that Oval Office meeting included not just the military to seize voting machines, but also the invoking of martial law.
	But hadn't we already had that back in March 13th?
	Weren't we already 280 days into that?
	Well, yeah, we were. So that's the other big problem I have with Trump.
	Martial law. We had medical martial law.
	Flynn had pushed for martial law for the election on TV. How many different flavors of martial law do you have to have?
	Well, it depends on what you want to do, right?
	You just declare martial law.
	Now I can do anything I want, right?
	Executive order, martial law.
	Flynn said they should rerun the election.
	And should make Powell a special counsel to investigate voter fraud.
	Now, Sidney Powell is the one that Tucker Carlson was saying.
	She's deranged.
	She doesn't have any, you know, just private text stuff.
	Called her out for just, you know, making wild, outlandish statements without showing any evidence for it.
	And they had plenty of time to show this evidence and to back it up, but they never brought the receipts.
	You know, that's the thing about this.
	It's like, you know that the elections are corrupt.
	You know that we had more corruption in the 2020 election than we've had in any previous elections.
	And you know that one of the reasons that that happened was because Trump locked us down with martial law.
	So we had vote-by-mail elections, which added a whole new layer of fraud to the elections.
	And yet they didn't do anything about it to stop it.
	They didn't even show their receipts, as they say.
	And, of course, you had my pillow guy who had, they made a big deal of it.
	He says, now I've got the receipts. I'm going to show them finally.
	You know, this is after this thing had drug on for more than a year.
	Lindell, Mike Lindell.
	And Bannon was covering it.
	He hyped it all up. He was there live.
	And he said he didn't show anything.
	He said he's going to show the receipts.
	He didn't show anything. Kind of embarrassing for Bannon, but of course that's where this all is.
	But not embarrassing enough that he would pull back from this narrative because that's where his bread is buttered.
	That's what his audience wants to hear.
	So he just, he was real embarrassed about that.
	Shut the feed off and said, well, this is, you know, nothing.
	It's like opening up Al Capone's vault with Geraldo Rivero.
	Hey, there's nothing here.
	Okay, well, now for something completely different.
	And then he comes back to it.
	They start selling Al Capone's vault again, if you want to think of it that way.
	As the New York Times reported, White House counsel Pat Cipollone and the White House chief of staff Mark Meadows repeatedly and aggressively pushed back on the ideas being proposed, which went beyond the special counsel idea.
	Mr. Cipollone told Trump that there was no constitutional authority for what was being discussed.
	While the people briefed on the meeting said, other advisors from the White House and Trump campaign delivered the same message throughout the meeting, which stretched for a long period of time.
	CNN notes shouting and insults ensued and the night ended with Trump tweeting that a coming gathering in Washington, D.C. on January the 6th would be wild.
	You know, it's interesting to see how this continues to propagate.
	And I don't know.
	It's like the vaccine.
	You can tell people about it and just keep stepping in it.
	It's like this other QAnon stuff.
	You know, he had the Sound of Freedom, did a great job of a true life story and everything, but because Jim Caviezel, who means well, I think he's duped.
	I don't think he's, you know, part of a disinformation campaign, but he's bought into at least something that is sensational and can't be proven.
	Stick with the fact that we are trafficking human body parts.
	We know that. Center for Medical Progress has shown us that.
	Stick to that. Stick to the fact that children are being trafficked for sex.
	Aren't those sensational enough?
	Do you have to go to some QAnon thing about adrenochrome that you can't prove?
	Do you think that perhaps since QAnon was run by people like Flynn and the intelligence community, just call them the CIA, that perhaps they added some false details that would play into what people believe?
	It's quite likely. And that's the thing that makes us vulnerable to this.
	And that's why, unless you can prove it, you better not go to the mat for these things.
	That's the way they always get people.
	It's the typical trap.
	Steve Pachenik was a master at hooking that on people at Infowars.
	That's exactly the way the intelligence community operates.
	Also said to be of interest...
	To investigators is December 14th, 2020, the day that a slate of fake GOP electors signed certificates falsely claiming that Trump had won the election.
	So this is not the way this works.
	The Electoral College doesn't operate the way the Constitution says in the first place, but the way that this has...
	But what they were doing here with this was not anything like the Constitution either.
	Every time you get somebody who's on the ballot for president, the party that puts them on the ballot, or if it was an independent candidate, that candidate would go out and find people to be electors.
	So if you got a dozen people from your state, you know, you got a dozen congressional representatives, you would have a dozen electoral college representatives, and you would just go out there and pick them yourself.
	And so the Democrats have a slate of electors, and Republicans have a slate of electors, and Libertarians have a slate of electors, Independents would.
	But that doesn't make them official electors.
	Just because I was a Libertarian Party elector in one election doesn't mean that I could go out there and claim that Andre Maru had won the election and claim that that was real.
	You have to be sent by their state office.
	And that's usually the Board of Elections, which is under the executive branch, but there's also a constitutional case to be made that it would be the state legislature.
	But they didn't make that case.
	And all these alternative slates of electors were not sent by any of the state legislatures.
	So, when we look at all of this, as Trump is soaring in the polls over his criminal indictments, making him a hero, it's amazing.
	Like I said the other day, you know, look at how much hatred It came out from the end of June for DeSantis.
	Everybody's saying he's worse than Trump.
	He's worse than Trump. Why do they hate Trump?
	Why do they hate DeSantis?
	Is it because he's committed some crimes?
	No. It's because of policy.
	They hate Trump because Trump is a competitor to them.
	They hate Trump because he is a very effective campaigner, a reality TV personality.
	He could cost them the election, but they hate DeSantis because he's pushed back on the grooming.
	He's pushed back on the attacks on parental rights and so forth.
	That's what they really hate about DeSantis.
	They don't hate his tax policies or anything else.
	That's what they hate about him.
	But as the Democrats are looking at this, this is an op-ed piece on the Hill, although it was written by a guy who was actually a speechwriter for Reagan.
	But Drudge put it up.
	When is the optimal time for Biden to drop out of the race?
	Not whether, but when is the optimal time for Biden to drop out of the race?
	It's now gotten to the point where I have had a number of Democrats including staunch supporters of the President tell me that it makes them nervous, uncomfortable, sad, or gives them a feeling of foreboding when they watch Biden speak in public.
	Yeah, I know. I kind of get the same kind of thing, you know, when I watch this happening.
	And we've got a sample of this.
	Here's President Biden and his latest garbled message.
	Included groundbreaking Asian-Americans like Vera Wang and and and Joan Shingang.
	And of course, you can go on social media.
	You can see all the clips of whatever happened the last day or so with Biden.
	Whether it's him using King Charles as a guide dog, you know, with his hand on him, you know, show me where to go, or Going over, reviewing the troops, the Grenadier guards, and he walks over and tries to engage with him in a conversation.
	I mean, Joe Biden's pretty old.
	Has he never seen I Love Lucy?
	These guys don't talk, you know.
	And so King Charles has to grab him and show him, no, no, you've got to come over there.
	It took a while to get him going.
	But this op-ed piece on the Hill, the possibility raises a critically important question.
	When would be the optimal time for Biden to announce that he's dropping out of the race?
	We give the Democrat Party the best chance to retain the White House.
	A very strong case can be made for immediately.
	If the Democrat National Committee is going to open up the primary to other candidates, the sooner the better, he says.
	Of course, this is not without precedent or irony in this case.
	And so he goes and talks about the fact that you had Lyndon Johnson, who was a sitting president back in 1968, And he was being opposed by a lot of people in his party who were against the Vietnam War.
	He had riots that were happening.
	Very unpopular president.
	His war on poverty, his war on Vietnam, both of those were failing.
	And so he made the announcement that he was stopping the bombing of North Vietnam and then that he would not seek the party's nomination for president.
	He wasn't stopping the Vietnam War.
	That would continue on with Nixon and Kissinger.
	But one of the things that really nudged him over the edge was RFK Sr.
	entering the race.
	And now we've got RFK Jr.
	The ironic part of this announcement made 55 years ago is that both may have been forced in part by the words and deeds of then New York Senator Robert Kennedy, the father of the man now challenging Biden for the nomination.
	By the time he'd made those announcements, he was already viewed with deep suspicion by Republicans as the architect of big government, while those on the left, especially in college, saw him as a warmonger, captive to the military-industrial complex.
	One of the reasons I put this in here with the cluster bombs.
	Is Biden captive to the military-industrial complex?
	Of course he is. Captive to them, captive to the CIA. But of course, if we look at RFK Jr., as I've said before, he is kind of the mold of the old-time Democrats like FDR and others.
	He believes that government is really the solution and it can be made to work.
	It doesn't have to be minimized.
	It doesn't have to fit into the Constitution.
	As a matter of fact, I think RFK Jr.'s best slogan would be, Make America Great Society Again.
	Because that's exactly what he would do.
	He would focus his administration around the climate alarmism that he has, as well as his idealism as an old-style Democrat.
	He has some very important things to say to us about the wars, about the COVID war, the lockdown, the censorship, the vaccines, the rest of the stuff.
	That's very important, and I'm glad he's saying it.
	But I cannot support...
	You know, a great society, part three.
	In the shadow of RFK, fell across his path.
	Johnson said, our enemy, or rather, sorry, it's RFK who said, our enemy, savagely striking at will across all of South Vietnam, has finally shattered the mask of official illusion with which we have concealed our true circumstances, even from ourselves. Unable to defeat our enemy or break his will, At least without a huge, long, or ever more costly effort.
	Isn't that an accurate assessment of where we are in this Ukraine war?
	And what are we going to do with it?
	Because, you know, we're using the cluster bombs, as Biden said, and as a matter of fact, he has been called out for violating military secrecy.
	You're not supposed to tell the other guys that you're running out of ammunition, and that's what he did in his interview.
	On CNN. They said, well, you know, we're out of the other stuff, so we're going to use the cluster bombs.
	It's an omission of defeat.
	It's an omission of, again, our strategic position.
	You could argue that that was far more damaging than any documents of national security documents that Trump might have had or shown to any of his sycophants.
	You know, he made that announcement publicly, and he is in a war.
	That we are unable to win without escalating this into major weapons of mass destruction.
	And of course, you know, everything in war today is a major weapon of mass destruction.
	We're talking about nuclear war that would bring the war to us.
	And we're talking about the cluster bombs that bring the war not just to civilians, but to future civilians, assuming that there is going to be peace at some point in time.
	It's pushing the war forward.
	It gives all new meaning to the forever wars, the endless wars that we've had.
	That's what cluster bombs are.
	Even after the troops go home, there's still a war on the civilian population.
	So 15 days after RFK declared for the presidency, Johnson withdrew.
	It had enough. Riots in American cities.
	He had stumbled in the New Hampshire primary.
	He had won, but just barely beat Eugene McCarthy.
	Johnson was a ball of conflicting insecurities, and on top of all that, his public approval rating was hovering around 36%.
	He said, but there's one striking difference between Lyndon Johnson and Joe Biden.
	When Johnson decided in 1968 he couldn't handle the stress of the rest of the election cycle, The 6'4", physically imposing Lyndon Johnson was only 59 years old, 21 years younger than Joe Biden.
	A question some Democrats had in 1968 was whether Johnson waited too long to drop out of the race.
	And the mantle was picked up by his then-Vice President, Hubert Humphrey, who was easily beaten by Richard Nixon.
	And they said, well, it might have been different if Humphrey had gotten in sooner.
	Well, I don't know. I don't think so.
	He was too tainted with all these policies.
	And he was part of both the warfare and the welfare state that people were rejecting.
	One group of people rejected one.
	The other group of people rejected the other.
	He didn't have a constituency there to move forward.
	We need to reject the policies of Biden and the policies of Trump.
	They're both pushing the same thing.
	But, of course, now one of the other things that has changed with all this is the level of outright corruption in these elections.
	But as we look at the politics involved, we had several Republican candidates jump in in support of the cluster bombing.
	Mike Pence jumped in.
	He's been focusing his support on Ukraine as a way to distinguish himself from other candidates, including Trump and DeSantis, who at this point are saying that they, you know, I think this war needs to end.
	As DeSantis said, he thought it was a local conflict.
	Then he walked it back after he got a lot of criticism and said, no, no, Putin is evil.
	But he basically said it was a local conflict.
	In other words, it's not any of our business.
	Trump is making the absurd claims that he's going to end it in a day.
	But whether you believe that or not, both of them are pushing back on it.
	Pence sees this as his ticket.
	Maybe he could be. Instead, a lot of them are worried about Lola Harris.
	Maybe Pence could be on a ticket with Biden.
	You know, a fusion ticket.
	How about that? Because, you know, Pence is right there with the vaccine and the lockdowns and all that stuff.
	And if Biden wants to proceed on with the war and the military-industrial complex wants somebody there to do it, maybe, you know, Pence could do that.
	He could be the number two guy for another criminal.
	Another war criminal. Another mass murder.
	So, yeah, we're going to use the cluster bombs because we're out of ammunition.
	And Pence, who's running for the 2024 GOP nomination, said on Fox News that it's in the U.S. interest to give Ukrainians what they need to stop Russians there.
	And just like Lindsey Graham said, just kill as many Russians as you can.
	That's the key thing. And if the Ukrainians have to die, they've got to die.
	It doesn't matter. We'll find them to the last Ukrainian, and we'll fight, continue to kill Ukrainians even after this war ends with a cluster bomb.
	Joe Biden's been slow on it, said Pence.
	I mean, he just approved the cluster munitions, which Russians have been using for a year and a half against Ukrainian forces.
	Wait a minute. I thought we were claiming moral superiority to Russians.
	Now we're going to be like that. Now what they do is an excuse for us.
	You know, the Russians said, You invaded Iraq over lies, and you invaded this country and that country.
	You're in Syria. You're stealing the oil and all this stuff.
	Why can't we invade another country, right?
	They use each other to excuse these actions.
	Same thing the political parties do.
	Well, look at the crimes of Biden.
	Biden says, oh, look at the crimes of Trump, or look at the crimes of Hillary Clinton.
	That's why our standard needs not to be...
	Comparative. It needs to be absolute.
	It needs to be compared to absolute standards.
	And so Pence says, well, I welcome the cluster munitions.
	Well, does he? Maybe you should have a look at what these things actually look like.
	Here's a demonstration of it and an explanation of it from the UK Telegraph.
	Cluster munitions are conventional weapons designed to disperse a number of smaller explosive devices over a wide area.
	There are two big issues with cluster munitions.
	First, by design, they spread sub-munitions over a large area, meaning they can, especially if used in built-up areas, injure and kill non-combatants who should be protected from harm even in wartime.
	Second, like any piece of equipment, there is a failure rate, meaning some cluster bombs will be left on the ground and could explode at any time, particularly if moved by civilians, such as farmers working their field, or children eager to explore the curious objects left lying around.
	And here you can see a grieving father approaching his child on the ground.
	And here's a young teen with their legs and hands.
	I don't care. Yeah.
	Biden defends the decision to send Ukrainian controversial weapons banned by more than 120 countries, reads the screen.
	Well, DeSantis said in mid-March, Ukraine is not a vital national interest for the U.S. He said it was a territorial dispute.
	A few days later, he reversed course by calling Putin a war criminal.
	But wait a minute. Didn't we say that sending cluster bombs is a war crime?
	There are reports of illegal cluster bombs and vacuum bombs being used by the Russians.
	If that's true, what is the next step of this administration and is there a red line for how much violence will be tolerated against civilians in this manner that's illegal and potentially a war crime?
	It would be. I don't have any confirmation of that.
	We have seen the reports. If that were true, it would potentially be a war crime.
	Obviously, there are a range of international fora that would assess that, so certainly we would look to that to be a part of that conversation.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, I don't know if the Russians are doing it, she said, but if they are, it would be a war crime.
	But, of course, if we do it, it would not be a war crime, you understand.
	Biden himself had said, as I pointed out yesterday, 1982, Israel used cluster bombs, and he said, well, that was a war crime.
	Nikki Haley, though, supports the cluster bombs.
	Nikki Haley says this is long overdue.
	Biden's weak and slow approach has dragged out this war far longer than it should have gone.
	So, yeah, just nuke them now and get it over with.
	Again, Nikki Haley, one of the most despicable warmongers out there.
	She's as bad as Lindsey Graham, John McCain, any of these people that you've seen in recent years.
	She was pushing to get troops on the ground in Syria.
	Of course, we now have troops on the ground in the oil areas as well.
	When did they do that?
	When did they have the vote to do that?
	To steal the oil? I don't know.
	Trump said, well, just take the oil.
	Maybe that was the declaration.
	Kind of low-key, wasn't it?
	But at the time, you remember that Theresa May, the UK Prime Minister, And Nikki Haley, who was U.S. Ambassador, were pushing very hard because of the claimed narrative that a double or triple or quadruple agent, Skripal, was supposedly poisoned by VX gas.
	But he didn't die. You know, the most potent nerve gas out there.
	The person treating him said he seemed like he had an opioid overdose.
	He didn't die.
	The doctor didn't die. Nobody around there died like they would have.
	But anyway, she wanted to, on the basis of that lie, she wanted to put boots on the ground in Syria, Nikki Haley did.
	Now she wants to put cluster bombs, spread them all over Ukraine for posterity's sake.
	Pence appeared to take aim at both Trump and DeSantis in his interview.
	He said, my former running mate likes to talk about solving it in a day.
	Well, the only way that you'd solve this war in a day is if you gave Vladimir Putin what he wanted, he said.
	Later, without naming DeSantis, he said this is a straight-up Russian invasion.
	This is not a territorial dispute.
	Well, it is CIA aggression is what it is.
	You had CIA, which has done coups everywhere, did a coup in Ukraine.
	They want to change the Russian regime.
	So we've had the coup in Ukraine.
	We've had eight years of civilian bombing campaigns.
	So who cares about some more cluster bombs, right?
	That went on before this as a provocation.
	This has been a relentless push by the intelligence agencies in this country to have a forth-turning war.
	And as we talk about this, and Mike Pence out there pushing this, he likes to trade on his Christian credentials, does he?
	Well, if you're going to talk about being a Christian, you better put up Do you understand what the Christian approach to a war is, Mike?
	First of all, you have a declaration that is based on the fact that we were attacked.
	You don't have preemptive war that is justified.
	Preemptive war is never justified.
	The narrative was that that was what happened with Pearl Harbor.
	Of course, we know that FDR was trying to bait them.
	But it was, as he said correctly, a day of infamy.
	Regardless of whether they were provoked by supplies and other things like that, it was still an unprovoked attack.
	And what FDR said about Pearl Harbor was, regardless of what happened behind the scenes, it was a betrayal of America by FDR, pulling back defense positions and keeping people in the dark.
	But it was still an unprovoked attack in the sense that we had not attacked them.
	And so it was a day of infamy.
	But now we do that all the time.
	It's preemptive war. It's a good thing.
	It's supposedly justified now.
	Not morally justified. Not under Christian principles.
	This is why America is not a Christian nation anymore.
	We have rejected Christian morality.
	Which says that you only do it in defense of innocent life.
	And your goal is to stop it as soon as possible.
	Do you hear anything in there about Mike Pence wanting to stop this thing?
	No. No.
	About when did Russia attack us?
	No. Is Ukraine our country?
	No. Do we even have a defense agreement with them?
	No, they're not in NATO. And so you try to end this as quickly as possible.
	Also in a justified war, you try to minimize civilian deaths.
	And that's why when you look at what happens with the cluster bombs, if your goal is to try to minimize civilian death and harm, That's why people have pushed back against this particular weapon.
	All these weapons are designed to kill.
	They're weapons of mass destruction.
	All of them. Not just the things that we claimed that Iraq had.
	Chemical, biological weapons or whatever.
	All these weapons are weapons of mass destruction.
	One of the reasons why war should only be fought for good reason.
	Why it should be stopped as soon as possible.
	Because we're going to save the lives of the troops as well.
	But when you look at prolonging this war, even beyond some imagined truce, who knows how many decades they plan on this thing going.
	Because if their goal is to take over Russia or to overthrow Russia, this is going to go longer than I'm going to live.
	And take a look at this picture that I've got up here now.
	Here's different people.
	I showed you a picture of a teen who had both legs blown off and a hand.
	Well, here is a mother who is embracing her daughter who's had both of her legs blown off.
	The mother has had one leg blown off.
	The other one is bandaged, but presumably she's not going to lose it.
	This is what Christian Mike Pence is pushing.
	I don't understand.
	For Pence, for Haley, for Pompeo, for Bolton, for Biden.
	For Biden. They want to continue this type of war, and they want to escalate it, as RFK Jr.
	said. And he's right about this.
	He called it ceaseless escalation.
	He tweeted out, he said, Now President Biden plans to send these cluster bombs to Ukraine.
	Stop the ceaseless escalation.
	It's time for peace.
	He says Biden was opposed to cluster bombs in 1982 as well when he opposed their sale to Israel.
	So what happened to his conscience, he says?
	He also said cluster bombs are supposed to be used as a weapon of last resort, but we were told Russia is divided and Ukraine is winning the war.
	Why not use this opportunity then to propose a favorable peace?
	Well, because they're lying to us.
	Russia is not in the weak position that they want us to believe.
	And they're no strangers to a prolonged war.
	They're no strangers to massive suffering.
	It is within living memory of these people.
	Hey Americans, said RFK Jr., is this what you really want?
	War with Russia? Seriously?
	If that isn't what you want, call your senators.
	And demand that they keep us out of this war.
	And he has a link to where you can find their contact information.
	But again, you know, Biden telling people it's necessary because we've run out of ammunition.
	Joe Biden wasn't supposed to say the quiet part out loud.
	We've run out of ammunition, but now that is out there, said Ian Miles Chung.
	And Glenn Greenwald tweeted out, Fortunately for Biden, there is no anti-war left in the U.S. Congress to bother him about this.
	There are a few leftist commentators, otherwise loyal to Democrats, who are making some noise about it.
	But by and large, this will go forward without any protest.
	And when we look on the conservative side, these people love war.
	Any war. Well, the bottom line is that...
	As we all know, Biden is just a CIA puppet.
	And a ventriloquist on me.
	That's why he's perfect for Jeff Dunham.
	So let's lighten this up. Here's Jeff Dunham with his Biden puppet on his lap.
	You know, I guess Jeff Dunham is playing the role of CIA military industrial complex.
	We're happy to have you here.
	Thanks a lot. Yeah, it's great to be here.
	Yeah, I must say, sir, you look really good.
	Thank you. And yes, that's all that really matters, Jack.
	Jeff, Jeff. Well, you should look good, but you also have to do a good job running the country.
	Oh, of course, but that's as easy as riding a bike.
	And as president, did you know that I have done the impossible?
	No, sir. What did you do?
	I fell up a flight of stairs.
	Three times in ten seconds.
	First Senator to ever do that, President.
	President! I think my son Hunter wants me to give up cycling for skiing.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	He keeps saying, the powder's great.
	Sure.
	That kid is the smartest man I know of.
	Really? Yeah. Which tells you one thing.
	What's that? I know a lot of dumbasses.
	You know, I didn't see your motorcade driving here tonight.
	Nope. Why not? Uh, the price of gasoline.
	Have you seen it?
	Yeah. Someone should do something.
	Don't look at me. I just read answers.
	Yeah. You know, a lot of folks are wondering why we don't just produce the oil that's already in the United States.
	Wait, what?
	We can do that?
	Aren't you familiar with our country's oil production?
	Yeah, it's falling and it can't get up.
	Ha ha ha! Walter, I want to pause here just for a minute.
	What, you realize you're not really the president?
	Yes, I am. No, you're not.
	Come on, everybody says I look just like him.
	And somebody else is always telling me what to say.
	Okay, Jeff Dunham.
	Ha ha ha.
	And you know...
	As Gerald Slinty always says, when all else fails, they take you to war.
	When a president fails, they take you to war.
	He is a failing president taking us to war, just as we would expect.
	And the only opposition that he gets is not really from conservatives, but from a couple of leftists.
	Ilhan Omar and Sarah Jacobs from California.
	Want to at least stop the cluster munitions and take them out of the NDAA. You know, this was ended, cluster bombs were ended by George W. Bush.
	One of the reasons why he did it was it doesn't, not just because they're concerned about civilian deaths and perpetual deaths after the war ends, but because it was a threat to troops.
	They would have to then go through those areas and they would be killed by or injured by those unexploded bombs.
	It's not a strategically effective weapon if you kill your own troops with it.
	And so George W. Bush stopped it.
	Trump brought it back right away.
	Right away. Beginning of his administration.
	So the amendment that's been put forward by these two Democrats...
	Says, notwithstanding any provision of law, no military assistance shall be furnished for cluster munitions.
	No defense export license for cluster munitions may be issued.
	And no cluster munitions or cluster munitions technology shall be sold or transferred.
	Again, Sarah Jacobs and Ilhan Omar.
	Where's AOC? Occasionally she has a cortex.
	Does she not have a cortex or conscience?
	Maybe we should call her Alexandria Occasional Conscience.
	She's got her conscience turned off at this point in time.
	So AOC is AWOL. She's AWOL on all of this.
	And I guess most of the public is as well.
	Cambodian Prime Minister, they know what it's like to have the cluster munitions left behind.
	Cambodian Prime Minister has urged Ukraine, don't use these in your country.
	Don't use these.
	You're going to be suffering from them, future generations, for a very long time.
	He said it would be the greatest danger for Ukrainians for many years or up to a hundred years if cluster bombs are used in Russian-occupied areas in the territory of Ukraine.
	He said, since 1979, about 20,000 Cambodians have been killed by unexploded American bombs and landmines planted during Cambodia's Civil War.
	I mean, it was a big thing in the UK, as a matter of fact, after World War II. We had V2 rockets and other bombs that had landed places, unexploded bombs.
	And they even had a series on the BBC about people who went around as they would find bombs.
	And this happened for a very long time after the war.
	But these are just seated in there everywhere, as you saw.
	Little tiny bombs.
	And so people are saying that Biden has violated national security by telling the enemy that we are otherwise out of ammunition for this stuff.
	We are stretched to the breaking point.
	And as we look what is happening with Hunter Biden, you know, the corruption, everybody was laughing about it, making all the drug jokes and everything.
	It's not really a laughing matter that, you know, we have now become Rome on the Potomac.
	That was always something of a statement, of an exaggeration, but boy, it really is now.
	And I guess Hunter is playing the role of Caligula.
	The Russian news media, and I'm not going to show you the pictures of it, but they show it every night, and they'll blur out or block out certain areas of these pictures from Hunter Biden's laptop.
	How is it the Russian news media has it?
	And so many people have it, but the FBI just can't seem to find this information and do anything about it.
	I don't know. It just seems to be everywhere, except in the FBI offices.
	Or in American mainstream media, but on Russian media, they show pictures of him.
	And he's leading around a little girl that is all dressed up in sexy negligee type of stuff and makeup on.
	I mean, a very young girl.
	Like five years old.
	Other pictures of him.
	Doing drugs.
	With massive numbers of prostitutes, but especially the ones with little kids.
	That's also part of it.
	We don't have to invent crimes, and we don't have to talk about stuff that we don't have hardcore evidence on.
	The hardcore evidence that we've got is enough.
	It almost makes me wonder, and I know a lot of people do this.
	A lot of people in media will focus on this type of stuff because it's sensational, because it gets eyeballs, because people are like, oh, that's terrible.
	Let me see. You know, that type of thing.
	It's disgusting. And it needs to be punished.
	But when you try to even talk about the tax issues, they're pushing back.
	And this interesting development as Hunter Biden's...
	Lawyer is pushing back against the IRS whistleblowers.
	The group that is representing the IRS whistleblower, Gary Shapely, called Empower Oversight.
	The president of that group, Tristan Lovett, says that if the Washington Post does not come clean and say that Shapely never spoke with them, then the paper is acting as an accessory to Hunter Biden's legal defense.
	He's saying this because they have gone on the attack, and they said, well, you know, he planted these stories with the Washington Post and other things like that.
	He said, I have never talked to them.
	I waive any privileges about this, and I want them to make a statement that I have never talked to them because I have never talked to them.
	And so that organization is demanding for the Washington Post to clearly state that he's not their source for their story, not involved in this, but other than...
	Saying that we don't comment on sources.
	The Washington Post is silent.
	And so his people representing him said, and if they don't do anything, they're simply being accessories to Hunter Biden's legal defense.
	Well, we know that is the role that the Washington Post and the New York Times and all the rest of the mainstream media have taken for the last several years.
	We're going to take a break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Let's talk a little bit about the other side of this election, the Trump side of this election.
	And, you know, as I look at his increasing and unceasing popularity with more and more Republicans and the more criminal indictments they throw against him that are, by the way, justified, in my opinion, it is I understand that there's a double standard But just as we're talking about cluster bombs, the fact that Biden is going to use cluster bombs doesn't excuse Putin using cluster bombs, does it?
	Well, when I saw this article about Taylor Swift, and I don't really keep up with Taylor Swift, I understand that she's incredibly popular.
	I think she had like the five of the top songs all at once, which is unprecedented, I think.
	But again, not my taste in music.
	But she has incredibly dedicated fans.
	They call themselves Swifties.
	And I saw that Taylor Swift fans are still attacking rivals like Scooter Braun after all these years, and she refuses to tell them to stop.
	I thought, hmm, what is that about?
	I don't know who Scooter Braun is.
	I barely know who Taylor Swift is.
	But I looked it up and they identified him as a rival in this story from tabloid The Sun out of the UK. Music executive and the music executive, that's who Scooter Braun is.
	He's a music executive.
	He's not another singer.
	He's a music executive.
	And Taylor Swift had been embroiled in a years-long feud that first started over his sale of her early master's catalog in 2019.
	But the bad blood has continued to this day and her fans are angry and they're threatening him and so forth.
	New information has come to light about Taylor's years-long allegations against the music manager and others that she was blindsided by the sale of her master's in 2019.
	I don't understand what the problem is, Frank.
	Did she not get the money? No, they would say that it was embezzlement or something like that.
	She got the money. I don't know why she didn't want it sold, but this is something that has irritated her and her fans.
	In recent weeks, new evidence has emerged that Taylor, or at least her team, was aware of the sale ahead of the deal being announced that June.
	Okay, so it's kind of a fake thing that's going on here, maybe.
	They said, however, she's continued to profit off of this manufactured drama.
	And meanwhile, it's affecting real people's lives and safety.
	I thought, you know, there's a lot of lessons about that in the Trump cult.
	He's continued to profit off of this manufactured melodrama that's going on, even as they're ramping up these charges.
	And quite frankly, I don't think they'll ever put him in jail.
	They're going to cut some kind of a deal with him.
	And when you look at how this thing is going to shake out, what did he do in the 2020 election cycle?
	He didn't use much of his money.
	As a matter of fact, he got most of his money after the election as part of that Stop the Steal grift, or in his case, the Stop the Steal, that was Alex.
	The grift that Trump was running was Save America.
	He got like $250 million.
	The first $8,000 that anybody would contribute to that went to Trump.
	And he gave a cut to the RNC. Anything over $8,000, they would throw into the kitty to do some, give it to Rudy Giuliani to fly around to different states and make speeches and things like that, because they weren't doing any legal work.
	And when you look at what is happening now, the fact that his fundraising went up significantly.
	He got $35 million.
	And, of course, DeSantis got $20 million in a six-week period.
	And over the quarter, he pulled in another $120 million.
	Do you realize that...
	With DeSantis having $150 million after not even a full quarter of fundraising.
	And Trump getting another $35 million just fundraising off his criminal indictments.
	And he hasn't said how much he made in the PAC as well.
	I don't know how much Trump made in his political action campaign committees.
	But again, we go back to the year 2000 and we look at George W. Bush running against Al Gore.
	The entire campaign, the entire campaign of the two of them, and that's all the donations that were made directly to each of them, to Bush and to Gore, as well as all the donations that were made to their political action committees.
	Bush got $100 million for the entire cycle.
	DeSantis has already gotten more than that in one quarter.
	And then Al Gore got 70.
	He said, he's at $100 million, and I've only got 70.
	He said, he's buying the election with all this stuff.
	But think about the fact how this has exploded.
	Here are just in one quarter, and DeSantis alone has made nearly as much as both presidential candidates 23 years ago.
	And I know they like to brag about, oh, well, I'm more popular than you are because I've got a poll and I'm more popular than you are because look at my fundraising and that type of thing.
	I'm not saying it's a good thing.
	I think this kind of money in politics is a real evil.
	I think it's why we're seeing the kinds of corruption, wars, and every other imaginable corruption out of Washington is because of the amount of money that's there.
	And the money is being drawn in by the concentration of power.
	The concentration of power in Washington, as I've said so many times, is like a black hole.
	And it is this massive pull of money into that black hole.
	Everybody buying favors.
	Everybody understanding that the model now is a public-private partnership.
	Stakeholder governance and stakeholder capitalism and crony capitalism.
	This is why everybody is buying these guys out.
	I don't see it as a good thing.
	And it is really exploding when you look at it.
	But getting back to Trump, so what is his end game with all of this stuff?
	Because he's got big legal problems.
	I've had listeners who are lawyers say, look at, I looked at this stuff and they've got him.
	And not saying that because they hate Trump.
	Even Alan Dershowitz, the best Alan Dershowitz can come up with as a defense for that Bedminster tape, It's to say, well, maybe that was declassified and Trump didn't know that it was declassified.
	That's the best excuse he can come up with.
	That's really grasping at straw.
	You know, Trump says, well, I could have declassified it, but I didn't.
	So now this is a big problem and so forth and so on.
	So maybe it really was declassified and he just didn't know it.
	Well, good luck with that.
	That's how desperate the case is.
	But Alan Dershowitz, that's all he could come up with.
	I mean, you know, he's a real Saul Goodman.
	He can come up with all kinds of crazy stuff, and that's the best he could do.
	And that's just one of the cases.
	You know, we've got other things that are going to be coming after him.
	So what is the deal going to be?
	And as I said before, I think Trump's best bet for a pardon would be if a Republican won.
	And yet he's trashing all these Republicans.
	And, um, if he, you know, if the Republican won, I think the Republican would pardon him.
	DeSantis has indicated that he would look very closely at pardoning January the 6th and Trump and so forth.
	And I think that would happen.
	I mean, you look at what happened with Richard Nixon and, um, uh, you know, with Watergate and things like that.
	And, and, um, you had president Ford, uh, did that and it cost him politically, but, um, Anyway, that would be his best bet.
	But you know, he may take a deal.
	He may cut a deal with the government.
	I can imagine Trump taking a deal and saying, all right, I'll drop out of the race and you drop these charges and say, well, it's not in the country's best interest to continue to pursue this to the final degree.
	And so I can imagine him doing that.
	And then if he does that, He gets to walk away with all the tens of millions of dollars that people have given him for this campaign.
	He gets to keep all that stuff.
	He doesn't have to spend it on stupid ads or anything like that.
	He gets to keep all that money.
	You know, when you run for office and you set up a campaign war chest, anything that you haven't spent, you roll it over for the next time you're going to run for office.
	But then when you retire, you get to walk away with all that stuff.
	I honestly think, you know, we're talking about when is Biden going to get out of the race?
	Well, the sooner the better. Same thing is true of Trump.
	And I think this is one of the reasons why Gavin Newsom is training his fire on DeSantis.
	Because Gavin Newsom is expecting that Biden is not going to make it.
	And he's also expecting that Trump's not going to make it.
	And I think that'd be the way that Trump would get out.
	And gracefully, in a sense.
	But he was at a UFC meeting.
	And you can see the clips on social media.
	I mean, it was a massive win.
	I mean, he's as popular as Taylor Swift.
	For me, the same reasons.
	And he was going around shaking hands with everybody.
	Mel Gibson was there.
	Joe Rogan was there.
	And that created a lot of stir.
	Because they have, you know, Rogan has said some bad things about Trump.
	And so he went over and shook hands with him.
	For a very long time, would not let go.
	Kind of like the handshake that Trump gave Macron, where he's squeezing his hand and he won't let go.
	Well, you know, Joe Rogan used to be a fighter, so good luck with that.
	I wonder... He was just hanging on to him.
	Maybe it wasn't a squeezing contest that was there.
	But Roger Stone had something to say about that, calling...
	Joe Rogan, a little weasel, along with some other things which we won't repeat.
	And he says he's a little weasel because he won't have Trump on.
	He's afraid of him. Hey, Roger, tell your buddy Trump if he wants to come on here, I'd be glad to talk with him.
	I'm not afraid of that SOB whatsoever.
	I got a lot of questions for Trump.
	I got a lot of answers for it as well.
	As a matter of fact, Let's talk a little bit about what happened with lockdown and everything else.
	But as an introduction to the MacGuffin, here is Alfred Hitchcock.
	Oh, good evening. I was just about to send greetings to an old friend.
	I'm sure modern, civilized methods of homicide are much more efficient, but I don't care for them.
	And look, I guess in a certain way...
	Yeah, as he holds the vaccine.
	...because I was the one that pushed it.
	It's a beautiful base of which some of you are there.
	You get angry when we mention the word vaccine.
	Don't get angry. Yeah, there is Hitchcock, and he's got a...
	I want to give a little something to my friend.
	He's got a doll there, and he's got a hypodermic needle there.
	Yeah. There's a lot of different ways that you can kill people, isn't there, Trump?
	You can kill them with lockdowns.
	You can kill them with remdesivir.
	You can kill them with your shot.
	And then let's take a look at what's behind all of this, as a matter of fact.
	This is an interesting article from Brownstone, Debbie Lerman.
	Best-selling author, Michael Lewis, pens a CIA COVID propaganda book called The Premonition.
	The premonition. And she goes through in great detail the connections of these people that he calls the Wolverines, the people who really saved us from all this stuff.
	And they're all connected to the CIA. Who would have thought?
	And again, that's one of the things that RFK Jr.
	nailed in his book, Chapter 12, The Germ Games.
	She said, She
	said, First, what Lewis is hiding or trying to divert attention away from is the massive CIA involvement And the COVID response.
	Secondly, that the intelligence and national security leaders who were in charge of the COVID response did not just censor information that contradicted their narrative.
	They also recruited widely trusted sources and voices, including internationally renowned authors to disseminate their propaganda.
	And this is yet another example of it.
	But what she does not say is anything at all about Trump.
	All this happened under Trump's administration.
	She has nothing to say about Trump.
	And when we talk about widely trusted voices, as I've said many times, would Hillary Clinton have been able to pull this off?
	No. Nobody would have trusted her to do that.
	We know she's a crook.
	We know she's a warmonger, a liar, a murderer.
	No. Yeah, so, you know, I had Fauci over here, and...
	You know, we brought in a subject, and we gave him the vaccine, and he died.
	But, you know, that's all right. We came, we saw, he died, as she bragged about the mass murder that she did with other people.
	As a matter of fact, the Navy SEAL that I talked to at the end of the week, last week, Drago, he was interviewed in the lead-up to the 2016 election.
	Where, you know, even Julian Assange at that point in time said, well, we know who Hillary Clinton is.
	We know she's a warmonger, a murderer, and a thief, a criminal.
	We don't know who Trump is, he said.
	Well, he found out Trump was the guy who was going to help the CIA in their efforts to kill Julian Assange.
	Trump stood by and held them, helped them to do that.
	But Drago, in the lead-up to the 2016 election, there was a picture of him in a newspaper article.
	They were asking people about Hillary and about Trump and everything.
	And he had a t-shirt.
	Big guy. Big arm.
	And on his arm, he's got an American flag.
	And above and below it, it says Hillary Clinton.
	And then above it, the American flag and below it.
	Killed my friends.
	Hillary Clinton killed my friends.
	At Benghazi. That type of thing.
	Well, when we look at the trusted voices, nobody trusted Hillary Clinton, but they trusted Trump.
	We were told that Trump was the antithetical solution to the globalists and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so, yeah, they used trusted messengers, and it was about the CIA's involvement.
	And so she said, why is exposing COVID propagandists so important?
	She said, in previous articles, I wrote about how the quarantine until vaccine response to the novel coronavirus was entirely determined by military intelligence.
	Not by public health people.
	You see, this is going back to Dark Winter, as I've said many times.
	And going back, if you want to understand what's going on with social media, understand that's also coming from the CIA. They created the venture capital firms that created these social media companies.
	They wanted to use this as a surveillance tool, as a censorship tool.
	And when you go back and you look at Dark Winter and all the rest of this stuff, all of that stuff was coming from the CIA, as R.K. Jr.
	also points out in his book.
	I've been talking about that for years, and I was glad to see that he had it there.
	But it was the CIA, military intelligence, that was saying the only way to respond to a novel pathogen would be to lock everything down and wait for a vaccine.
	And that's why I said I recognized this from the very beginning because they had run 20 or more of these germ games.
	They did it on an annual or more basis every year.
	It wasn't just event. Was it 201 or 301?
	I forget what it was. But it wasn't just that one that they ran in the fall of 2019.
	They've been doing it for 20 years.
	And they were the ones who came up with this, military intelligence.
	This had always been the public health plan for pandemic management.
	It was not a totally unprecedented, untested, unscientific response that was being copied from totalitarian China.
	And yet the people who want to excuse Trump for this will tell us that he was duped by the Chinese.
	He was controlled by the CIA. He was controlled by Fauci.
	But of course, this person who is, they want us to believe, they want to believe, was such a dupe, such a dunce, that he was controlled by everybody from the CIA to China.
	He's the one who's going to save us from all of them.
	Now, he was the trusted messenger for the COVID line.
	And he also allied himself with the CIA. And you can't make the argument that he didn't.
	Bill Barr. As Attorney General.
	Bill Barr goes back to George H.W. Bush and his days rebuilding the CIA. And the guy that he brought in as his number two was a very young Bill Barr at the time.
	And then he made Bill Barr his Attorney General.
	And the first thing that Bill Barr did when he became Trump's Attorney General was to go after Julian Assange.
	You take a look at Gina Haspel.
	And Trump made a big deal about how the Iraq war was based on lies.
	And yet, where did those lies come from?
	Torture. Who did the torture?
	Who did the cover-up? It was Gina Haspel who ran that program of torture and of cover-up.
	And she was the one who produced the lies about weapons of mass destruction.
	And so when he puts her in charge, you've got to understand...
	That the CIA is as much or more of a part of this than Klaus Schwab or Davos or the UN or any of these other organizations.
	The CIA wants the Great Reset.
	And he bought into that.
	You look at the behavioral science, and as I've talked about, you know, the UK organization, they even called it BIT, B-I-T. Behavioral insight team.
	And they were nudging people.
	These people in the UK and the US even use the same terminology.
	Nudge and all the rest of this stuff.
	And they put the bit in your mouth.
	And they put the mask on your face.
	Probably not you. But America.
	And people in other countries.
	They put that bit in our mouth and just turned us wherever they wanted us to go.
	With behavioral psychology.
	So many countries, not just the U.S., turned their military propaganda playbooks originally intended to counter terrorists and topple foreign regimes, they turned it on their own people.
	And I'm telling you, that was the purpose from the very beginning.
	From the very beginning of the CIA and the NSA, they were focused on Americans, not on foreign enemies.
	That's why we had the church committee hearings, why we had FISA and so forth.
	But she said, propaganda succeeds when it both silences opposition and propagates lies.
	And that's what we had through all of this.
	Every bit of this was military intelligence, CIA. She said, now looking at this book and looking at the connections of these people, It really underscores this even more so than if you look at the 20-year history of these games.
	Here's what she has to say. She said, here's an imaginary conversation between me and the author of The Premonition, Michael Lewis.
	You see, the whole premise even of that title, The Premonition, well, we had a premonition that something like this might happen.
	And so we practiced it for 20 years.
	But we didn't cause it or anything.
	And yet, she traces these guys back to 9-11 and to the anthrax attack and all the rest of this stuff.
	She says, here's my imaginary question.
	A New York Times review...
	It says that in the premonition you follow medical renegades who warned for years that something like COVID pandemic was bound to happen, while the federal government proved to be inordinately unhelpful.
	Similarly, a Times article asks, Why this rogue group of patriots, as you call them, had to find one another and do the work that their bosses weren't doing?
	How ludicrous this is, when they've practiced this for 20 years.
	Thank you on Rockfin, Frank Wood.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, maybe these people should quit sending these guys money.
	What a concept. Yeah. Yeah, exactly.
	So she said, who are these so-called rogue renegades, and how did you find out about them?
	Well, she says, Lewis writes in his book, in late March 2020, Richard Danzig introduced me to the Wolverines, a kind of secret group of doctors who were kind of trying to find ways to find shadow management techniques for the pandemic.
	She said, well, here's a question.
	Did you know that Richard Danzig chairs the board for the Center for New American Security, a national security think tank?
	Wow. So he's involved with that.
	As a matter of fact, when I did the interview a couple of months ago, I guess now, the book Four Battlegrounds, Peter Charest, he's with the Center for New American Security.
	And the whole purpose of that book, the Four Battlegrounds, is to say, you know, we're fixing to have a war with China, as we say, down south.
	Fixing them, mix it up with these guys.
	And so, but he had a lot about artificial intelligence because he saw that as really kind of the technological high ground, military high ground for this.
	And that's what I wanted to talk to him about.
	But the whole point is the Center for New American Security, which is funded by all the usual suspects, is pushing to have war with China.
	And that's really what the war with Russia is a lead up to.
	Anyway, she goes back, she says this Danzig guy, who is associated with him also, quote, his primary activities in recent years, says that site, that think tank, have been as a consultant to U.S. intelligence agencies and the Department of Defense on national security issues.
	You might also be interested to know, or maybe you already know, that in 2009 Danzig wrote A Policymaker's Guide to Bioterrorism and What to Do About It, in which he explained that understanding potential bioterrorism agents It's a very specialized field.
	Quote, obscure to the typical CIA agent.
	But he's not the typical CIA agent.
	He's a cut above, right?
	And then she says, in her imaginary conversation, she can imagine the author coming back and saying, well, they were, and this is what he says in the book.
	She has footnotes to it.
	He answers and says, well, they were a secret group of doctors who were influencing policy all over the U.S., Carter Mesher was sitting at the center of it.
	No one in the world, so far as I knew, knew who they were.
	And so she questions that.
	She says, oh, okay, so they were influencing policy all over the U.S., even though they were rogue renegades that nobody in the world knew?
	Doing what you call redneck epidemiology?
	She says, so who is this Carter Mesher, the guy who is, quote, sitting at the center of it?
	Well, in his book, Lewis says he was not a policy person.
	Not a Washington person.
	Not a person who knew anything about pandemics, but he was just a doctor from Atlanta.
	He had only ever wanted to be a doctor.
	From that moment he walked into an ICU, he sensed that it was where he was meant to be.
	In 2005, he was surprised by a call from the White House.
	Even more surprised by what they wanted him to do.
	They wanted him to help create a national pandemic response plan.
	He had learned a lot about infectious disease by treating it.
	In ICU, he knew nothing about pandemics, and he hadn't given any thought about how to plan for them.
	But it was the White House calling him.
	I figured, yeah, yeah, what the hell, he said, and she quotes that from his book.
	This guy is just a doctor at a hospital in Atlanta.
	And he gets a call from the White House and they want him to come up with a pandemic plan.
	Is that really plausible?
	She says, so we're to believe that Carter Mesher, who describes himself as, quote, a kind of doofus from the VA, who knew nothing about pandemics, was invited to the White House in 2005, at which point you claim he basically invented the idea of pandemic response?
	She says, let me just add that...
	Another one of your Wolverines said that Mesher was, quote, recruited because they needed someone who understood how a hospital actually worked.
	She says, well, it's quite a story.
	A totally unknown doofus ICU doctor from the VA with no pandemic expertise has called him to the White House out of the blue to work on pandemic planning because he understands how a hospital works.
	Not the other doctors, I guess.
	Anywhere do. I'm guessing maybe there were other reasons why he was on Bush's pandemic response team, and we'll get to that in a second.
	But let's fast forward to the COVID pandemic.
	What was Mesher doing when the pandemic hit?
	Well, Lewis says in his book, Carter had been back in Atlanta for nine years.
	He'd left the White House at the end of Obama's first term and returned to the VA. Veterans Hospital Administration.
	The people around him either never knew or soon forgot where he had been for the previous six years and what he had done there.
	Nobody ever brought up the White House or the pandemic.
	We're led to believe in this book.
	That's what he says. He's in the federal government, but basically he's working out of his house for the VA, and the VA doesn't even know they employ him.
	His superpower is invisibility, she says.
	Outside of the VA, at least a few people from the White House days had not lost track of him.
	Tom Bossert, for example.
	Trump named Bossert to be his first Homeland Security advisor.
	Bossert built a team of people to deal with biological risk and instantly called Richard Hatchett and Carter Mesher.
	So, to recap, Mesher is an unassuming ICU doctor, a doofus, who had, as he says, We're good to go.
	Perhaps Bossert called Mesher and Hatchet because they were deeply embedded in the intelligence community's counter-terrorism biological weapons program and were known as experts in the field.
	And before you answer that, let me provide some interesting information that may or may not surprise you.
	The only shred of evidence I could find online of any activity at all by super-invisible Carter Mesher between 2011 and 2010 was his participation in a 2015 conference at the Hudson Institute called Biological and Chemical Threat Preparedness and Emergency Response.
	And here's where the connection to 9-11 comes in.
	At this conference, one of the general gist, she says, of the conference was that the nation failed to heed the advice of the 9-11 Commission, the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, and many other experts who warned of the dangers of biological terrorism and warfare.
	And at the conference, Meischer's talk addressed an anthrax scenario.
	And as I've said over and over again, We had Dark Winter, the first one of these germ games, two months before 9-11.
	One week after 9-11, we had the anthrax false flag attack.
	They initially blamed it on Iraq, and then they found out after years of investigation and from the The people who are the Lawyers Committee for 9-11 Truth, you know, they tried to frame a guy who was one of the chemical labs, but of course at that lab they did not have the capability to make the kind of weaponized anthrax that was used.
	That capability was only at two labs that were affiliated with the CIA, and the FBI never investigated those labs, never indicted anybody at those labs.
	And so then after two months after the anthrax attack, people like Joe Biden put together the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act, model legislation that they sent out and told the states to enact because they said, you're going to have to do this at the state level.
	This is why this is all this stuff.
	Well, it's just bad governors.
	That's the MAGA line.
	It wasn't bad governors.
	It was a bad intelligence community.
	And Trump was in lockstep with them.
	And he was funding it for them.
	And I believe that he knew.
	One of the reasons I just stated is deep connections with the CIA. Gina Haspel and others.
	Bill Barr. Grabbing these people, putting them in place, but especially Gina Haspel.
	Putting her in as director of the CIA, the person who lied to us under the weapons of mass destruction.
	I don't think Trump is stupid.
	I think he's a traitor.
	Although we tend to focus on the public health and medical consequences, said Mesher in his speech, of a large-scale biological attack, it would be much more than a public health emergency.
	It would be a national security crisis.
	And by definition, this would not be a naturally occurring disease outbreak and would not behave as such.
	So she said, let's understand, these bio-defenders describe this as not a public health medical problem, but as a national security crisis, even a war.
	And of course, they went to war with us, didn't they?
	And they are still at war with us.
	We've had a ceasefire.
	They've ceased firing their orders at us for the moment, but it's a temporary ceasefire.
	That is the eye of the hurricane.
	And they still have their authority in place because we have not demanded that they surrender it.
	And we have not held anybody accountable for any of this.
	Getting back to Mesher, she said, specifically, it sure seems like he's some kind of bioterrorism expert who works very, very, very covertly, doesn't it?
	By the way, who was his boss during his four-year stint in the Obama White House?
	He wasn't quite sure how it happened, but his name wound up on a list of experts who were asked to stick around for a few months to advise the new administration in case of emergency.
	A few months, he hung around for four years.
	So, in the book, he says the official in charge of him, Heidi Avery, came from some deep place in the intelligence community and was now called Deputy Assistant to the President for Homeland Security.
	So, The Heidi Avery, who was described by former CIA Director John Brennan in his 2020 biography as a CIA Director within the Office of Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council, which was responsible for supporting the President, Vice President, and National Security Advisor on all matters dealing with intelligence, including covert action.
	Yeah, that same one was allied with him.
	Again, this was not a trap.
	Laid by the CIA and the deep state for Donald Trump.
	He's much smarter than MAGA gives him credit for.
	They don't want to give him credit for the vaccine.
	They don't want to give him credit for the pandemic lockdown or any of this stuff.
	As we've learned from our rogue doofus renegade, Carter Mesher, this is probably a deeper undercover weapons of mass destruction expert, is what he was.
	He was on the biodefense directorate that folded into the resilience directorate.
	And he had a CIA director boss who advised the National Security Council on covert action.
	And then we go to the other guy who was brought in with him, Richard Hatchett.
	Lewis says in his book, in 2001, here we are back to dark winter again, and 9-11.
	In 2001, Richard Hatchett entered the subculture of the federal emergency response.
	A pair of recent events had pushed the threat of bioterrorism to the front of people's minds.
	People who worked in and around national security, the anthrax attacks on Capitol Hill in October 2001.
	And then in 2005, what happened in 2005?
	Well, we had the Iraq War was going.
	It was based on lies by Gina Haspel.
	Saddam Hussein had preserved the smallpox virus, we were told.
	And so on the basis of that extra lie, we got the PrEP Act.
	It is what is denying any compensation to people who have been injured by Trump's warp speed vaccine, the PrEP Act.
	Even worse than Fauci's 1986 act about childhood vaccine immunity for the big pharmaceutical companies.
	And so...
	Richard Hatch is quoted in the book as saying, I was going to stuff I didn't really belong at.
	I would be going to these meetings at the White House or Homeland Security Council.
	I don't know what's going on here.
	Why'd they pick me? I don't know what I'm doing here, right?
	I'm noticing a pattern here, she says.
	As with Mesher, you say that Hatchett was just a regular old doc with no national security experience.
	Yet somehow he found himself, who knows why or how, working at the White House with Homeland Security Council.
	It's like Forrest Gump or Zellig or something.
	You know, just look at this. In fact, Aaron Cariotti in The New Abnormal reports that in 2001, Richard Hatchett, a member of the CIA, who served also on George W. Bush's National Security Council, was already recommending obligatory confinement of the entire population in response to any biological threats.
	Additional details of Hatchett's biography include serving on Obama's national security staff as deputy director, Then director of BARDA, you know, the biological version of DARPA that was established in 2006.
	You know, when you look at these guys, it's always been about locking down the population and holding everybody there until he had a vaccine.
	This is why I knew on that day when Trump put out the executive order, they're actually executing Dark Winter against us.
	I'll never forget that. It's amazing.
	In 2017, Hatchet was appointed CEO of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, CEPI, C-E-P-I. You've seen that many times, right?
	One of the first organizations, they say according to their website, they tout the fact that they were one of the first organizations to respond to the pandemic, announcing its first three COVID vaccine partnerships on 23rd January of 2020.
	At that point in time, there were only 581 confirmed cases worldwide.
	It wasn't a pandemic.
	But notice that even in January, and this is as Alex Azar, the big pharmaceutical executive from Eli Lilly that Trump had put in as director of HHS, he'd put in his emergency order.
	And these people are already putting together their vaccine stuff on the 23rd of January.
	And it is supposedly a worldwide pandemic, even though Even they are saying we've only got 581 cases.
	Do you see how dangerous this World Health Organization Treaty stuff is and these new rule changes that they're putting on out there?
	They locked the world down and nobody was even sick, even in their stretch of the imagination.
	So she said it sounds like Hatchet was the opposite of a doctor with no national security experience, running things from the outside.
	In fact, he was a bioterrorism and medical countermeasures expert directly involved in the UK government's pandemic response and in the global vaccine effort, going all the way back to January of 2020 when it wasn't even a pandemic and before COVID-19 had even been named.
	And in the book, Lewis says, Richard was actually the jungle guide for the book.
	Richard is the one who held my hand throughout the whole book.
	In other words, this is kind of ghostwritten by the CIA. Richard, the CIA agent and BARDA director, held your hand through the book that you wrote?
	And he, quote, had no obvious place in the national security conversation, according to you?
	And he didn't correct you?
	Or was he the one that was dictating the story to you?
	It's a great article. I would recommend that you read the whole thing.
	I'm not going to read it all to you.
	But I thought it was important to tie the fact that they are still lying to us about this.
	And this is one of the reasons why they still keep pointing people to Wuhan and to that lab.
	Because all of this points to the CIA. And it all points to Trump's involvement in this.
	But from the very beginning, in Dark Winter, you had former CIA Director Woolsey was playing the role of president in that very first germ game simulation and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so, she says throughout this book, The Premonition, Michael Lewis promotes exactly what the national security and intelligence pandemic managers need for the consensus management to be.
	The quarantine until vaccine plan was not a military response.
	Oh, yes, it was. And it was put together by a group of covert CIA agents.
	That's what they don't want you to see.
	They want you to believe that this is all modeled after the draconian response of China's totalitarian regime.
	Actually, we were practicing that on an annual basis for decades before China actually implemented it.
	And again, you want to say that China was the one who duped Trump?
	Was it China who duped him or was it the CIA who duped him?
	Or was he happily playing along with all this stuff because he gave Fauci, instead of firing Fauci, he gave Fauci a medal on his last day in office.
	And that medal was the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
	Freedom to do whatever Fauci wanted.
	But no freedom for Americans.
	She says, what this book is pushing is a lie.
	This was all invented by a group of rogue doctors back in 2005.
	And when in 2020, the CDC for some reason refused to follow that plan that had been internationally accepted as a standard pandemic response, those same heroic renegades came back and somehow from outside the federal government worked hard to make sure that it was implemented this time.
	Well, the only thing she missed was the fact that this began in 2001.
	But throughout the book, They talk about how they took down people who push back against their lies.
	John Onidas, the epidemiologist and biomedical data expert from Stanford, I remember talking about him a great deal.
	You know, he was pushing back and debunking these lies from the very beginning.
	But she said, when we look at other books that have been put out, there's a whole slew of books that They're being ghostwritten by the CIA to define the history of the last three years.
	She said, one of them, the vaccine by Joe Miller, in this book about the development of the Pfizer vaccine, which I believe to be mostly fictional, the author thanks none other than Richard Hatchett for, quote, helping me map my thoughts.
	She said, if that sounds eerily similar to how Lewis called Hatchet, quote, a jungle guide, then get this.
	One of the main characters in this other book, The Vaccine, is gripped by what can only be described as a supernatural premonition about the lockdowns.
	So they have created their institutions, social media control.
	And again, social media was at the very epicenter of the lockdown of information.
	Making sure the people didn't share information or skepticism about any of this stuff while they were able to push out their own stuff.
	And that goes back to about the same time.
	You know, as all the stuff was rolling out, and they did 9-11, and they did the dark winter simulations, they were also creating social media organizations.
	And they practiced this second shoe to drop.
	They practiced that for a very, very long time.
	I'll talk about one other aspect of this before we take a break.
	And that is, you know, what the CIA had to do with this, military intelligence.
	And then here's the banker side of this.
	Because you can't have a war without having the bankers getting their cut, right?
	And they got a big cut of this COVID war against all of us.
	This is from Rolling Stone Magazine.
	And it's Sean Woods.
	He says, Inside the PPP scams and the CARES Act fraud that cost the U.S. billions.
	And it's actually trillions, according to one analyst.
	A guy named Haywood Talcove.
	He was a CEO at LexisNexis Risk Solutions.
	This is a database information company.
	In late March of 2020, he was packing up his office, having sent his employees home.
	He was worrying about laying off his staff.
	He was worried about his family's health and how he was going to manage two young kids at home during the pandemic.
	But when Trump announced an initial $2.2 trillion relief package to bail out millions of Americans desperate for cash, why are we desperate for cash?
	He prohibited us from working.
	You're Mr. Make America Great Again.
	Told us we were not essential.
	You're going to have to shut down, lose your job, lose your business.
	A lot of people lost their business.
	So they put out $2.2 trillion for people who are desperate.
	An expert in cybersecurity, Tal Cove had worked in both the private and public sectors and had been raising the alarm about government exposure to scams for many years.
	And now it was like all of his prior analysis and warnings about fraud had just become real.
	Oh, I know how he feels.
	Because all of our warnings about what they were going to do with FEMA and how they were going to take away our, you know, freedom and the clarophonia national emergency and use it to lock people up or lock them down.
	We saw that happen.
	We saw with this financial side of it.
	I saw universal basic income being tested out on people.
	For the longest time, and they openly talked about it.
	And you had Elon Musk backing Andrew Yang, whose one issue when he began running, his one issue was universal basic income.
	And Elon Musk wanted that talked about.
	Because it's been the intention of these people in Silicon Valley that they're going to take our jobs, as Michael Bloomberg said when he was running for president.
	You know, the smart ones of us are going to take your jobs, and we've just got to figure out how to pacify you so you don't use guillotines against us.
	And that was his term, guillotines.
	And so we're going to do it with universal basic income.
	We're going to give you a basic handout from the government.
	And that's going to pacify you.
	And so we saw Donald Trump lowering the boom and saying, you can't go anywhere, you can't do anything, but here's some money.
	Here's some money. It's a dry run.
	It's conditioning.
	It's doing it from the inside with chaos, iteratively, as Fauci said in October 2019.
	He was talking about getting his vaccines out there, the Milken Institute, October 2019.
	Anyway, so this guy, he's spotted...
	He spent his whole life looking for fraud.
	He looks at this plan that Trump has come up with.
	A plan that...
	Trump and his Goldman Sachs people came up with.
	Steve Mnuchin and others.
	These people, these Goldman Sachs bankers that he brought in.
	Trump brought in all these generals.
	He was going to be the candidate of peace, and he still tells us he's the candidate of peace, and yet he brings in all these generals, especially the most rabid of them, like Mattis and others, who want war.
	It was Mattis who was instrumental in getting the cluster bombs reapproved.
	And then he brings in the CEO of Goldman Sachs, and they gave him a $250 million golden parachute.
	They accelerated his payoff just so they could get him into the Trump administration, Steve Mnuchin, and all the rest of these people.
	And they come up with this plan.
	This guy looks at it and he says, this is just ripe for fraud.
	I said, they're going to allow anyone to get unemployment insurance benefits.
	These systems are vulnerable.
	All you need was a name, a date of birth, an address, and a social security number.
	See, what he doesn't understand was that's because this is a dry run of universal basic income.
	It's conditioning. Tal Cove understood that he had to act, so he called the White House, trying to warn them of the threat.
	No response.
	Finally, after weeks of trying to get through, one night he was playing with his kids, he got a call from an unknown number, and it was Larry Kudlow, Trump's director of the National Economic Council.
	I'm like, Mr. Kudlow, I really need to warn you that you have to do something about identity verification, or it's going to be the biggest fraud in the history of our country.
	They said Kudlow did not respond for requests for comment.
	He says he talked to Kudlow for about 15 minutes, but he couldn't get him to budge.
	Kudlow's like... The money's got to get out quickly.
	You cannot have speed and security, he said.
	Well, that's kind of interesting. He says, but I'm like, that's BS, sir.
	That's just not true now.
	You're never going to get the money back.
	Oh, we've got to do it fast.
	There's no time to test this vaccine.
	There's no time to make sure they've got a replacement for internal combustion engines.
	We've just got to get rid of them all, and we've got to do it right now.
	Now, they're not talking about getting rid of any cruise ships, as I pointed out yesterday.
	Just one cruise line has got Carnival Cruise, has got, with it, 63 ships.
	It puts out 43% more of these gases that they say are going to kill everybody with global warming.
	It puts out 43% more of that than all of the cars with internal combustion engines in Europe combined.
	All of the cars.
	Those 63 cruise ships.
	But they're not talking about limiting them.
	They're not talking about even parking them at a port until they come up with some other solution.
	No, no, no. They're fine.
	We've got to get rid of the cars.
	And so you can't have speed and safety, said Kudlow.
	Or rather said people who used to test the drugs.
	So we'll just forget about the safety.
	We've got to do it with the speed. You can't have speed and security.
	All right, so we'll just go with the speed.
	And, of course, you can't have liberty and safety either, so, you know, they keep telling you that you've got to give up your liberty for safety, and yet they don't care about safety when it comes to speed, and they don't care about security or safety in any way, shape, or form.
	Anyway, he says Kudlow told him to get in touch with the folks in charge of sending out small business loans and the pandemic unemployment assistance loans.
	He says, but those guys told him, we're not seeing any fraud.
	And he said, I told them, dude, you've not even given out any money yet.
	How could you? We're not seeing any fraud.
	They hadn't even cut anybody any checks yet.
	He says, that's why you're not seeing it.
	So I'm sending them screenshots of the dark web.
	And I'm explaining exactly how it's going to go down.
	And I tell them, you're going to have a $200 billion problem on your hands if you do this, if you don't do anything about this.
	But he said on March 27, 2020, Trump signed the CARES Act, pumping more than $2 trillion into the economy.
	The money flowed like an open spigot, saved the livelihoods of millions of people.
	But Talco was right.
	While many breathe sighs of relief, others saw the crisis as an opportunity, as a chance to steal millions, says Rolling Stone, but actually it was billions.
	Or maybe even trillions, depending on who you ask.
	A list of the various CARES Act schemes is endless.
	There's the couple who scammed some $20 million off of unemployment insurance in LA. The Chicago man who is under indictment for selling bunk COVID tests and allegedly raking in $83 million.
	The Florida minister...
	Who the feds allege faked the signature of his aging accountant who was suffering from dementia in order to steal $8 million in PPP loans and one particularly loathsome and effective plot offering fake meals to underprivileged children in Minnesota to get $250 million.
	Noted serial liar George Santos allegedly also got in on the act.
	He was charged with receiving unemployment benefits while he had a six-figure job in Florida.
	He has pled not guilty.
	By the government's own accounting, we potentially dished out some $16 billion to folks with suspicious emails.
	Factoring in Biden and Trump's relief efforts, the U.S. released more than $5 trillion into the economy.
	And understand that those loans that were put out there, the banksters got their cut of that $5 trillion.
	Whether or not these loans were legitimate or not, The banksters still got their cut.
	The Goldman Sachs people did their job.
	Just like the CIA people in the Trump administration did their job.
	And the military industrial complex people and the generals did their job, didn't they?
	What job was Trump doing?
	Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz told Congress that more than $100 billion in COVID aid money may have ended up misappropriated, but many experts believe it's much higher.
	AP estimates it at $200 million went to fraudsters and another $123 billion was misappropriated.
	But Tal Cove himself, the guy who was trying to warn the government about this, says that he thinks it is way bigger than any of this.
	The real number, he said, is much higher.
	I think the government lost a trillion dollars due to fraud in the pandemic.
	One trillion dollars.
	Now, that's a lot of money, but that's not very much considering the fact that between Trump and Biden, they handed out $5 trillion.
	That's only a fifth, only 20% of that being fraud.
	Do you think that that is an excessive number?
	I think that is very reasonable.
	And in light of all this, They just participated in the fraud of a trillion dollars.
	Do you think anybody in Washington who really doesn't care about the trillion dollars in fraudulent stuff, do you think they really care about $10 million for the Bidens?
	When the banksters can get what they want and the CIA can get what they want, do you think they really care about that stuff?
	Do you think that they care about the cocaine in the White House, any of that stuff?
	No, this is why everybody is spending so much money on presidential candidates.
	So, as all of this is happening, again, going back to the celebrity aspects of it, and the fact that Trump's former lawyer, Ty Cobb, said Trump is incapable of acting except out of his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge.
	And so we see in Iowa, because the governor there has decided that she did not want to go to the Trump rallies.
	You know, she has not endorsed anybody.
	She's shown up a couple of times at DeSantis rallies, but she's not shown up at Trump's rallies.
	And so, you know, he's in the same category that Scooter is for the Swifties.
	He said, I opened up the governor position for Kim Reynolds, and when she fell behind, I endorsed her.
	And she won, and now she wants to remain neutral.
	I don't invite her to events.
	DeSantis, he says, is down 45 points.
	Again, he is sanctimonious.
	Why is Ron sanctimonious to Trump?
	Well, because he pushes back against the LGBT tyranny.
	He pushes back against the attacks on parental rights.
	He pushes back on the grooming and mutilation of kids and has...
	When Trump was out there pandering to them, kowtowing to them.
	And of course, you know, people at Fox News, like Sean Hannity and others, doing this.
	Yeah, it truly is amazing.
	You know, when you look at Fox News, they are facing yet another lawsuit, perhaps.
	And this one looks like it's going to be Ray Epps who is going to sue them.
	This is an article from the New York Times, and we're going to talk about that when we come back because I think there's some important aspects of this that are bigger than Fox News and bigger than Ray Epps or any of this story.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right
	back. .
	Making sense.
	Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The New York Times saying the case that could be Fox's next Dominion lawsuit.
	As I said, this is about Ray Epps.
	And Tucker Carlson was just on with Russell Brand.
	He said, there were feds everywhere on January 6th.
	Oh, really, Tucker? Really?
	You're just now telling people that?
	Yeah, it was not Antifa that you had to worry about.
	It was the feds, and that's what I said the day of.
	I said it the day before.
	I said it that morning, January the 6th, but I've been saying it from the very beginning.
	I said it enough that I got fired for saying it, that this was a grift.
	The real crime of January the 6th It was not anything that was done to the people.
	And, you know, there were some people who got violent.
	That was a crime. We got violent.
	That's a crime. But the real crime about January the 6th was what was done to the Trump supporters and the people who followed those people who pushed them in.
	And as far as I'm concerned, all this stuff about raps is to divert attention away from the people who actually provoked people who actually the victims of this, who are the people who naively showed up To support Trump on that day.
	They're the real victims.
	And of course I also said that not only were they in jeopardy from agent provocateurs, from feds who were going to be all over the place, but I also said it was going to be used to set up all conservatives.
	And we have now seen that has now become the narrative.
	And so I said the day after, you know, it was that Monday when Tucker Carlson got fired, the day prior to that, 60 Minutes had run a whole thing on Ray Epps.
	I said, well, that's it. You know, it's that lawsuit.
	And then everybody started saying, well, it was the Dominion lawsuit.
	Dominion demanded that he be fired.
	And it's like he didn't have that kind of exposure whatsoever.
	With the Dominion lawsuit that other hosts at Fox News had far more, as much or more.
	And it was this Ray Epps thing, and I'm absolutely certain of this.
	You know, he continues to say, I don't know why I was fired.
	Oh yeah, I can't imagine.
	No, it's the exposure to that and the fact that Discovery was going to be very embarrassing to them.
	But it looks like it's already there.
	And of course, this whole thing was pushed.
	This is one of the most despicable things about all this.
	Whatever Ray Epps did, one way or the other, you have to understand that Darren Beattie at Revolver was the one who was selling this stuff.
	He went on with Tucker.
	He was on everywhere. He was on with Tucker.
	He was on with Glenn Beck.
	I think he went on with Alex.
	He was selling this everywhere.
	Everywhere. And he was, you know, pointing the finger at one person after the other, saying, that's a fed, that's a fed, that's a fed.
	These are people who deceived people and pushed them into this event.
	Well, it wouldn't be that you were the one doing that, Darren Beattie, or that Alex or Glenn Beck or Tucker Carlson were actually pushing the people in there, or Trump himself.
	No, no. We've got to find some other guy out there to be the scapegoat.
	And I say that because Darren Beattie went after Stuart Rhodes for the same thing.
	I said, well, I don't really think Stuart Rhodes, and I said it at the time.
	I said I could believe he also put the point of the finger at Enrico Terrio, the head of the Proud Boys.
	And I said, well, I could believe that about him since we know that he has been a federal informant in the past.
	And because they took him out of that area before any of the, you know, kind of phony charges to ban him out of the area the day before, I said, it looks like they're, you know, protecting their informant.
	So I said, yeah, I could believe that about Enrico Terrio.
	I don't think now that he's been convicted that that is the case.
	But even after Stuart Rhodes was charged, With seditious conspiracy, and he was the first one charged, and of course he's now been convicted and sentenced 18 years in jail.
	Even after Stuart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers was charged, he still had Darren Beattie hanging to his story.
	I still say he's a fed, he said.
	And I say that they came up with a seditious conspiracy charge because it's ridiculous.
	It's such a ridiculous extrapolation, such a ridiculous overcharging that they will never find him guilty.
	And I've been looking for his retraction, but I don't see one from Darren Beattie about that.
	And as far as I'm concerned, that makes me believe that this Ray Epps stuff may be in the same category.
	He's just looking out there for scapegoats to protect Trump and these other people.
	Bannon is another one, right?
	All these people. Protect them.
	No, it's really just these feds.
	They did it. It's the feds that encouraged everybody to go on January 6th.
	Not Trump and not Alex and not Roger who are raising money.
	They stole these people's wallets, put them in legal jeopardy, many of them going to jail.
	And they come up with raps.
	He's the villain. You've got to have a different villain than who these guys really are.
	That's what really is just amazing to me.
	So, you know, you've seen the pictures of him saying, we've got to go into the Capitol, right?
	The day before. At other points, though, he pleads for calm.
	Once it becomes clear the situation is turning violent, says the New York Times.
	You're not going to hear that from Darren Beatty.
	He can be seen moving past a line of the barricades, but he never actually goes inside of the Capitol.
	Federal prosecutors, says the New York Times, have not charged him with a crime, focusing instead on a thousand other people who were actually violent or who trespassed into the Capitol.
	But look, it wasn't trespassing, in my opinion.
	Most of these people were invited in.
	They came in peacefully. It's like, oh, look, there's a bunch of people in here, and the police are there.
	Yeah, come on in. Come on in.
	How do you charge people under that kind of a situation?
	I mean, they were just victimized one side after the other.
	For 18 months, Tucker Carlson insisted that the lack of charges against Mr.
	Epps could mean only one thing, that he was being protected because he was a secret government agent.
	Carlson said, there is no rational explanation why this, quote, mysterious figure who helped to stage manage the insurrection had not been charged.
	Well, by that logic, then, Tucker, Alex, Trump, all these people who have not been charged, are they all federal provocateurs as well?
	Is that the only reasonable explanation you could have for them?
	You could use that against anybody to argue that they'd be put up, locked away in jail.
	And this is what I find to be very reprehensible about it.
	I mean, the Biden administration is bloodthirsty.
	They're looking for people to...
	Why would you start pointing the fingers at other people?
	Unless you want to protect yourself.
	Defamation law is going to tilt heavily in the favor of the news media, so they have to prove that they knew better and that they continued to say this for a very long time even after they knew it.
	That's going to probably require that they have document discovery as well.
	But as they point out, and what you're not going to hear in the official conservative narrative about Ray Epps, Is that they put him on the list because of what you have seen.
	They interviewed him for over an hour.
	When he saw that he was on the list, he called him up.
	They interviewed him for an hour. They removed him from the list a few months after agents formally interviewed him and his son in the spring of 2021.
	Carlson and others claimed that Epps' disappearance and lack of criminal charges meant that the government was protecting him.
	On his programs, Carlson claimed that Epps was a liar, demanded that he be arrested.
	In one segment that ran shortly before Fox News canceled Carlson's show in April, he showed viewers an image Of a FedEx logo that had been altered to say FedEPS.
	And again, that never felt right for me.
	For these people to be pointing the finger at people and saying, he needs to be arrested.
	He needs to be arrested. And we saw that happening over and over again with BD. What EPS whispered into the ear of that man on the day the attack happened, Has been answered three separate times, says the New York Times.
	In an interview the FBI conducted with a man Mr.
	Epps had talked to, Ryan Samsell, Epps' own interview with the authorities, and in a podcast interview with a co-defendant in Samsell's case, all three of them said that Epps urged Samsell to calm down.
	He came up to me and said, dude, his entire words were, relax, the cops are doing their job, Mr.
	Samsell said, according to a recording of his interview with the FBI. Now, subsequent to that, he has changed his story.
	Now, Samsell, again, the two things about re-ups, you know, he's yelling at people, well, tomorrow we've got to go inside, we've got to go in, and they all start yelling, fed, fed, fed, fed.
	And then the fact that he's whispering into this guy's ear.
	And then the guy goes running across.
	But what the guy said was he told me to calm down.
	Now he has changed his story.
	From jail, he has started calling reporters, mostly for right-wing media outlets, to say that he lied to the FBI and that Mr.
	Epps told him to pull at the barricades, not to calm down.
	Mr. Samsell acknowledged to the New York Times, however, that he had not provided this new story Under oath to prosecutors.
	So, when he was under oath, he said, well, he told me, dude, calm down.
	But now he's calling conservative talk show hosts, and he's saying, no, he told me to go do that.
	And that's not under oath.
	It's an interesting back and forth.
	But look, let's not lose track of how this all happened.
	Why was anybody there on January the 6th?
	Why is nobody talking about these news media organizations that are so eager to focus on Epps?
	It's because they don't want you talking about what they did.
	What Epps whispered to the man on that day is what they're talking about.
	And again, three different times it was looked at, and now we've got a fourth version of this.
	And as far as I can tell, I think this began back in...
	Late October of 2021 was when Darren Beatty at Revolver started putting this out.
	The curious character who is unindicted.
	And he got, that was his ticket on all the big talk shows.
	And so, again, whether it is feeding a story to the Trump people that they want to hear, Whether this is directing attention away from all the rest of the stuff, but everything, everything about this that has been done by the alternative media just reeks, in my opinion, reeks of fraud and of endangerment of people.
	And I think all these calls for prosecution are just more of the same stuff.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Again, this is from Geese Busters, a regular listener.
	Yesterday, he left a tip and he said that he had attended the funeral.
	I'm sorry, it wasn't yesterday. It was on Friday.
	I can't keep the day straight anymore.
	Seems like they just all run together for me, by the way.
	But anyway, he had said, I think it was on Friday, that he had just attended the funeral of his 29-year-old niece, who had, right after getting the vaccine, had gone into a coma.
	And he sent me her obituary, a very healthy young girl, and he said after the vaccine, she fell into a coma for a year.
	California mandated that all visitors had to be vaccinated or to enter the hospital, so my sister could not go to see her.
	They did change things recently, and was then planned to make a trip out there.
	In April of 2020, he says, my father, who's 92 years old, was killed in a nursing home, put on remdesivir, and I'm sure also morphine, he said, and they made him die by himself.
	And of course, this is also the way that they were able to kill people medically.
	Keep the family members away so they could not complain about what was being done to their family member.
	Killed him in a nursing home, put him on remdesivir.
	Yeah. He says, I'll never forget this.
	So he said, I understand.
	You can understand why I hate Trump.
	And thanks for reminding us every day about this baby-killing monster.
	And that's right. I haven't lost any loved ones directly due to this, fortunately.
	But I know people who have been killed through this medical, financially incentivized medical malpractice and lockdown.
	And unfortunately, many of them still do not really understand what happened.
	I have family members who suddenly had their cancer come back after they got their vaccine.
	They still are not suspicious about that at all.
	I talked about the asthma drug.
	You know, it's amazing how many different ways the pharmaceutical companies have of affecting our minds.
	And this was sent to me by a listener as well.
	Roy sent this in. Merck accused of downplaying the early evidence of drugs' brain impact.
	Yeah. To put it mildly, this is coming from Reuters.
	And they're talking about this drug that I mentioned last week.
	It was for asthma. A lot of children driven to suicide.
	This thing was launched in 1998, 25 years ago.
	And for 25 years, they've been hiding these effects, even though they were known at the time.
	How do they get away with doing that?
	Well, it's actually very easy.
	Because the FDA is so complicit in all of this.
	And that part of the story is now coming out.
	In 1998, their label from Merck said the drug's distribution in the brain was minimal.
	And they had no mention of psychiatric side effects, which are now very, very well documented.
	I played for you last week when I talked about this.
	I played Kim Witsack, who has gotten involved and became a consumer member of the FDA panel because of her husband committing suicide from SSRIs.
	And it took her forever to fight to even get a black box label for that product.
	And people were trying to get a black box label for this asthma drug, which is even more surprising.
	When you stop and think about the fact that, you know, for the SSRIs, they knew that it had a psychological effect, but for this, you're taking this for asthma.
	And they were lying to people from the very beginning.
	Merck's early safety claims later faced intense scrutiny in reports over two decades that patients, including many children, had died by suicide or had experienced neuropsychiatric problems after taking the drug.
	The FDA in 2020 ordered its most serious warning, known as the black box.
	That was 22 years after this had been going on.
	The drug is named Singulair.
	Merck now faces a raft of lawsuits alleging that it knew from its early research that the drug could impact the brain and that it minimized the potential for psychiatric problems when they made statements to regulators.
	And see, that's the key thing about this.
	If you go back and you look at the records, when Merck first sought FDA approval for Singulair, An FDA analyst relying on the company assertions.
	See the problem with that? They rely on the company's assertions.
	The company does the test and tells them what it is, and they say, oh, okay.
	Oh, we trust you. There's no oversight at all.
	This is complete regulatory capture.
	Just the company that has their drugs, that's the whole purpose of the FDA is supposed to be vetting these drugs, but they just do whatever the pharmaceutical companies tell them.
	So they said in 1998, they told the FDA analyst, quote-unquote analyst, what was he analyzing?
	Nothing. He didn't analyze their past history, their past statements.
	He didn't analyze the data.
	He just took their word for it.
	They told him in 1998 that, quote, only a trace amount, unquote, of the drug could be found in the brain.
	Show FDA documents.
	The FDA said Merck's data showed the presence of Singulair, quote, declined over time in all tissue.
	Well, some of the people were now looking at this.
	The, um...
	A researcher named Julia Marschallinger, who is a cell biologist who has studied the drug in Austria, the Institute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine in Austria.
	That team found in 2015 that the drug's distribution in the brain was more significant than described.
	The FDA cited her work when it ordered Singulair's black box label warning.
	She and her colleagues in Austria came away with a different finding when they reviewed Merck's original research and did some research of their own, which the FDA does not do any research of their own.
	They just take the word of the pharmaceutical company for this.
	They started looking at Singulair as a potential dementia treatment in 2011.
	So they're looking at it for dementia treatment.
	They know that it affects the mind.
	And so they started doing their own research.
	And then they saw that when Merck did the research, they knew that it affected the mind.
	They blatantly lied, committed fraud.
	And the FDA let them do it because the FDA doesn't do anything.
	They don't do any research.
	They don't do any checking. They don't even read the research papers or say, show me your data.
	None of that stuff. This is not science.
	This is corruption. They became interested in Austria.
	And the prospect, in part, they said, because of reports of psychiatric side effects of this asthma drug.
	Depression, agitation, hallucination from patients and from their medical providers telling them about all this stuff.
	Meanwhile, the FDA still doesn't pay any attention, doesn't care.
	People in Austria are looking at this.
	FDA is like, I see nothing.
	I see nothing, right?
	Yeah. While troubling, the side effects showed that the drug might affect the brain.
	The researchers wanted to understand if it could benefit older patients with dementia.
	In 2014, scientists in Austria reanalyzed Merck's original animal studies.
	And they noticed that the drug decreased almost everywhere in the body 24 hours after dosage except the brain.
	It accumulated in the brain.
	We've seen the same thing in the animal studies for these mRNA vaccines.
	They accumulate in the ovaries.
	Yeah. Depopulation drug in many regards.
	But again, this is just a tale of this corruption that is happening.
	Why is the FDA important?
	Everybody says, well, we've got to have an FDA. We've got to have somebody who's looking after, you know, for safety, right?
	Well, you know, we have Underwriters Lab.
	Is that a government organization?
	No, it's not. You know, they look at electrical equipment.
	And they're underwriters. They have to do their job.
	If they certify something as being safe and it's not safe, well, then that's on them.
	If you had private organizations that would vet these products, they would do a better job.
	They may not be perfect.
	They might miss them every once in a while.
	And if they did, they would have to pay the penalty for it.
	So they're going to do a better job.
	There is no consequences whatsoever for the FDA. You know what the FDA will wind up doing?
	Well, we need more people.
	You need to grow us. We need to get bigger.
	We didn't do our job, so you need more of us.
	It's always that way.
	That's always that way.
	This is historical.
	We always see this being done this way.
	And so it'll be an argument to have more of them.
	We do need to have oversight.
	We do need to have safe food and safe drugs.
	And the federal government is the worst possible place for that.
	You can have corruption and regulatory capture at the state level.
	There is no federal authority for this to be done at the FDA level.
	And it is even easier if it is centralized.
	You only have one group of small people that you've got to bribe.
	And you don't have 50 different ones.
	If they had to do this with 50 different organizations, there might be some honest people in some of these state organizations to hold them to account.
	But when it's all in Washington, and that's one of the reasons why they took a GMO regulation and moved it to Washington and other things like that, because they know that if they concentrated in one particular place, it's very easy to buy those people out.
	And now we see yet another drug.
	Producing suicidal thoughts.
	So we got SSRIs, murder-suicide pills, we've been calling it, SSRIstories.net.
	Over 7,000, nearly 8,000 stories of murder-suicide from people who took the SSRIs.
	We now got an asthma drug that they've been selling for 25 years, driving kids and others to suicide.
	Now we got this diet drug, Ozempic, if I'm pronouncing it correctly.
	They're looking at these weight loss drugs, raising the risk of suicidal thoughts.
	Wow, we're back to the pharmakia again, aren't we?
	Right? You look at that, again, I've talked about that, how that Greek word they see in the New Testament, pharmakia, usually it was translated as sorcery, because drugs are typically a part of pagan religions.
	And they give people out of mind, you know, mind-altering drugs, getting them in contact perhaps with other entities and all this.
	So they put it in as sorcery.
	Always a part of these other religions.
	But now we're seeing that we've got mind-altering drugs for asthma?
	Mind-altering drugs for weight loss?
	Yeah, pharmacia.
	Pharmacia, the sorcery.
	And of course they do not repent of their murders, do they?
	Yeah, we were also told about that, weren't we?
	We've seen a seven-fold increase in a syndrome called the Stevens-Johnson syndrome.
	It's now been linked to the jab, the Trump shot.
	A sudden increase in Stevens-Johnson syndrome, a rare and potentially fatal skin disorder.
	May be triggered by COVID-19, says the article from Epoch Times, or increased vaccination rates or lowered threshold caused by the vaccine.
	There's some connection to the vaccine, in other words, because they found zero cases of this with unvaccinated people, and they've seen an increase in these cases.
	Toxic epidermal disease.
	A necrolysis.
	In other words, death of the skin.
	Right? And kind of reminds me of Trank.
	You know, this horse tranquilizer that they're mixing with drugs or just taking it by itself.
	This zombie drug that you're seeing got really big in Philadelphia and it's spreading out from Philadelphia to other areas.
	People take it and they just, you know, freeze in place.
	You know, just looking up. And they're talking to one guy and they said, you know, so what does it feel like?
	He goes, I don't know. I pass out.
	Well, why are you taking it?
	It's absolutely insane.
	And then you look at these people who are going there to try to provide health services to treat them for the symptoms.
	And one of the big symptoms was it just rots your skin off.
	So you're taking something that makes you pass out and it rots your skin off.
	And, you know, people can die of the infections and things like that.
	Why are you doing this?
	I don't know. And so now here's another drug rotting people's skin off.
	And this is the mRNA vaccine.
	Of the 14 reported cases that they had in this one study here in Australia, five patients had COVID-19 a month before they developed it.
	Three of the 14 got the COVID vaccine shot.
	And none of them, nobody that got it was unvaccinated.
	This is something that only happens to the vaccinated.
	This is a severe hypersensitivity condition where the skin develops rashes, blisters, peels, forming painful areas that resemble a severe hot water burn.
	Mucus membranes, including the eyes, genitalia, and mouth, are often affected or severely damaged, leading to sepsis, pneumonia, infection, or death.
	Just like Trank.
	So, you know, take the jab. Why'd you get it?
	You know, people were coerced and bribed into taking and deceived and taking this jab and still are.
	But again, you know, you go back and you look at Frank, and it's not a law enforcement problem.
	Now you've got the Democrat governor of Pennsylvania talking about this and how it's spreading.
	Well, we're going to make it a controlled substance.
	Well, that's worked out really well for you, hasn't it, for the last 53 years, you know, or 50 years, with the war on drugs.
	That worked out fine. You stopped all that drug use by declaring it controlled substances.
	No, it is a spiritual issue.
	Which brings us back to the Pharmakia stuff again.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk a little bit about money.
	ABDCs, as I've said, you can talk about how undervalued gold and even especially silver, even silver especially as a relationship of multiple to gold, it is at a historically low level.
	Gold is at a very low level compared to the dollar, but they can manipulate these markets.
	The thing that I think that is important is one of the reasons why I tell people about Tony Arterman and Wise Wolf Gold, and he set up davidknight.gold to let him know that you came through me. But it's about protecting yourself from this cashless society, this global ID society, this mark of the beast society that they want to impose on us.
	And this is an interesting article from Exposenews.com.
	CBDCs are a solution for a problem that we don't have, and they want to implant it under our skin.
	Yeah, it's a mark of the beast thing.
	You'll not buy, sell, trade, do anything, go anywhere.
	This is why what Trump did was a dry run for all of this stuff, for the Mark of the Beast.
	It was a conditioning.
	That's why I said then, I said, well, you know, it is Mark of the Beast.
	If you look at it in terms of the way the thing acts, it may not be the final form of it, but it's the beginning of it.
	It's incrementally moving us into that, you know, it's a progression, if you will, and it was important to condition people for that.
	And so it was equally important to push back against that and to say, I'm not going to participate in that system.
	Speaking about universal basic income, Professor Richard Werner said, you will get 2,000 euros into your account every month.
	But, of course, to run this efficiently, they'll say, we need to use the latest technology, so you need the CBDC chip implant.
	You see how it all fits together?
	The UBI, Universal Basic Income, the CBDC. And, of course, we've already...
	It's not even a theory. It's not even just their war games.
	We've already seen how this has been introduced in India, for example, in the Adhar system.
	They wanted... Bill Gates worked with them to get everybody an ID. And he said, you know, they've got a big problem...
	People don't have IDs.
	We've got to get them an ID, and we've got to get them in the banking system and all the rest of it.
	They didn't have a problem with that.
	They didn't need that. They didn't want that.
	He wanted them to have all that stuff.
	And so he worked with the Indian government.
	What they did was they used a carrot and a stick, and I played the clip for you last week.
	The guy with Davos said, we're going to come up with carrots and sticks.
	A lot of sticks. We've got to have lots of sticks for this stuff.
	And so we'll give you free stuff.
	We'll give you the poor people.
	We will give you income, and we'll give you medical care, but you've got to get the number.
	If you don't get the number, you won't get any of that stuff.
	So it's the bribery, the blackmail, the carrots and the sticks, just as we saw with Biden's mandates, and just as we saw with Trump's lockdowns and his CARES Act and his PPP Act, the universal basic income.
	They've already rolled all this stuff out.
	Now, Richard Werner, He's an economist, a professor of banking and finance.
	He was the proponent of quantitative easing, he said.
	He proposed it in Japan in 1995 as a chief economist of a British investment bank.
	Besides experience as a senior managing director and a senior portfolio manager at Bear Stearns Asset Management, he's worked as a researcher or consultant at the University of Oxford, the Bank of Japan, the Development Bank of Japan, and the Asian Development Bank.
	And so he was the one who proposed the monetary policy that we call quantitative easing.
	And so he is now speaking out against CBDCs.
	At the Amsterdam Science Summit in 2022, he talked about central bank digital currencies, CBDCs, and the 2030 agenda.
	This is a guy who was an establishment guy.
	I mean, I just read you... His CV there.
	And he's worked with these big organizations, big universities, big banks.
	And he came up with a policy of quantitative easing.
	And he's concerned about CBDCs and the 2030 agenda.
	He gave an interview about CBDCs.
	And he said the high inflation.
	Now, this is a guy who, you know, came up with a quantitative easing.
	He says high inflation has been orchestrated by central bank's To further their agenda.
	Well, he should know. You have to think of CBDCs as a control system or a permit system, he said.
	Not as currency.
	It's a conditional currency based on you actually getting that permission.
	Now, if you happen to be some kind of critic of the government policy or a critic of central banks, this could be difficult.
	Or if you dare to step out of the 15-minute city zone, you know, maybe you'll find that, oh, my CBDC is not working here.
	I'm out of the area that I'm supposed to be in.
	Of course, these are things that I've already seen in China.
	There's plenty of videos where somebody tries to use it to buy a ticket and it doesn't work because his social credit scores are low.
	And he says, of course, there's no right to appeal because this is the regulatory state.
	This is another thing that is, you know, one of the things that DeSantis is talking about is we've got to get the regulatory state under control.
	We have regulation without representation, or we have taxation without representation, all the rest of the stuff.
	I don't know if he'll do it or not if he was to win, but it is important to have this discussion, to wake people up.
	And I found it very interesting.
	You've heard all this stuff about CBDC. I've talked about it before, but I think it's very interesting that the guy who came up with quantitative easing says that inflation is the tool to drive us all into CBDC. Maybe he had an oh-no moment when he looked at this.
	Well, I know what CBDC is about.
	I wasn't so worried about inflation, maybe, but now this.
	So, you know, again, even if politicians, if they'll talk about this stuff, you know, you've got DeSantis talking about CBDCs.
	You've got RFK Jr.
	talking about CBDCs.
	I think Ramaswamy has talked about CBDCs.
	So whether or not you support these guys, whether or not they would do it if they won, it's important for people to hear this information because most people don't know about it.
	As I pointed out in the poll, about half of the people have never even heard the term CBDC. But if you show them, if you ask them point by point in that one poll where they did, you ask them, well, what would you think about a system that did this or a system that did that and this and that?
	And every one of these things, it's about 75% to 80% of the people say, no, I don't want that at all.
	They don't want what CBDC is going to do, what the central bankers have said they're going to use it to do.
	So if you ask them on those particular issues, they don't want it, but they don't know what it is.
	And that's the big problem. So proof that this is a deliberate action, Professor Werner said, was just before COVID, in August of 2019, there was a conference in Jackson Hole of the annual Central Bankers Conference.
	But it invited BlackRock, the big asset manager, and BlackRock made a proposal.
	They said, there will be another crisis, but this time we should create inflation.
	They never explained why.
	They just say we must create inflation.
	And he said, and here's how we're going to do it.
	And they cited my proposal without mentioning my name, of course.
	And there's one more factor, he said.
	The Federal Reserve hired BlackRock in March of 2020 to buy assets.
	Oh, what happened in March of 2020?
	That's when Trump did the medical martial law executive order, lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff.
	So at that time, while he's doing that, The Federal Reserve hires BlackRock to buy assets.
	Quantitative easing was for a deflationary situation.
	But the way they were using it had to cause inflation.
	There was no doubt.
	And they knew it because they even said it.
	Now what he doesn't mention is the fact that You had the repo market.
	They were pouring trillions of dollars in the repo market in the fall of 2019.
	I remember talking about that.
	I'd never even heard of the repo market before.
	Just like I'd never heard it when all this stuff started happening in January 2021.
	What's myocarditis?
	Is that what you're saying? Now it's a household word.
	Pericarditis. And Gerald Salenti was talking about it at the time.
	The repos. In 2019.
	Pouring massive amounts of money.
	Oh, this one day they put in an amount of money in the repo market that's equivalent to the entire gross domestic product of Puerto Rico for a year.
	And then a couple of weeks go by and they put in another massive bunch of money and it was equivalent to the entire gross domestic product of Switzerland for a year.
	It's like, they're the 20th largest economy in the world.
	Look at how they're making up all this money and everything.
	So it was a massive program of inflation in the run-up to it.
	He said, so this current inflation is entirely intentionally created by the central banks, by the central planners.
	So how are we going to punish them for this?
	Oh, well, let's give them more powers.
	Let's give them unprecedented power over everything, over life on earth, through central bank digital currencies.
	He said, the true reason I think they wanted this inflation Because that is to cover up essentially the disintegration of the petrodollar.
	And to move to a new system that they want to be CBDC based.
	Yeah, they're all on the same page, aren't they?
	And as much as they may protest and say that China is the enemy, just take a look.
	The former head of the Federal Reserve, now Biden's Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen.
	Here she is with President Xi.
	One, two, three, actually three bows.
	I'll play that again. Three bows to Xi as Xi's shaking his hand.
	And an assistant comes out there and stops her from doing a fourth one.
	Talk about kowtowing to a communist Chinese dictator.
	That's it right there. It's amazing to me.
	It's amazing to me how he's protected.
	It was at, what's the name of that AI art program that you got where they won't let you do anything with...
	Mid-Journey. Yeah, Mid-Journey.
	They won't let you make fun of him.
	And I talked about that before.
	Spitting Image. In the UK, they have these puppets or, you know, vicious satires of people.
	And, you know, the puppets themselves are pretty funny satires just to look at them.
	And, of course, they're radical left-wingers, you know, so they do more vicious cartoons of the Conservative Party or of Republicans or whatever.
	Biden's just got this great big giant grin on his face and not real, but they don't do any distortion to President Xi.
	And so he's above reproach, and you've got Janet Yellen literally kowtowing to him.
	It's amazing. So he says, yeah, we just turn over everything.
	All of our life on earth is turned over to these central bank digital currencies.
	And, of course, they do want to move to the new system.
	And that's what we saw in Biden's orders to everybody in the executive branch last March.
	Come up with a completely redesigned financial system.
	Well, that in and of itself ought to be alarming.
	Wait a minute. You're going to completely redesign the financial system?
	The second one was to some of them, how are you going to enforce this?
	The third one was how are you going to write the code?
	But then the fourth one was to sell it through environmentalism.
	Environmentalism. And when we look at that, as Biden and Kerry are in the UK, and they're working with King Charles there, who has always been pushing this stuff.
	King Charles has been...
	Presiding over the Earth League.
	I know it sounds like some kind of, you know, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen or something like that.
	They're not extraordinary. They do have an extraordinary amount of money.
	And as Kerry is making his dire pronouncements there, he's talking to these people and saying, you know, we got trillions of dollars here to invest.
	You want to get in on this? You know, this is the public-private partnership.
	This is feeding at the trough for the multi-billionaires.
	And so John Kerry is doing the talking because, you know, Biden really can't.
	But Biden is standing there with King Charles.
	Listen to this. There's a full understanding here, particularly with the evidence of the last few weeks piling on, that when scientists are telling us that they are terrified by what they're seeing.
	I'm terrified by what I'm hearing.
	This group has come together to try to figure out, okay, how do we deploy the funds necessary to invest to create the new clean energy economy?
	And I'm glad to say that you recognize many of the people here, Your Majesty, and Mr.
	President, you've been with them before.
	They represent literally trillions of dollars either invested or of assets under management or assets owned, and they are making decisions every single day How do we accelerate this?
	So we can make trillions of dollars faster.
	You know, we have trillions of dollars to invest, and he really emphasizes that investment thing, and he mentions it a couple of times.
	And you see Biden standing there, you know, with his hands folded, and he's wondering what's for lunch or where does he go next?
	You know, don't leave me here, King Charles.
	Yeah. And Charles is standing there grinning, all getting ready to cash in on this stuff.
	It's disgusting. And then Kerry also had this to say.
	This is a very important point.
	The climate crisis is growing by the day.
	You just saw and have reported on what happened in New York.
	All around the world, there are record-breaking days where the heat is greater than it's ever been before.
	This will be the hottest June and July.
	It'll be the hottest summer.
	It'll be the hottest year. And we all know that because the science is telling it to us and because Mother Earth is responding by telling us exactly what's going on.
	It's not nice to fool Mother Earth.
	I got back to some margarine commercials there.
	Yeah, Mother Earth is telling us this.
	You don't know anything, and you're not showing us anything.
	It's all smoke and mirrors.
	But isn't it interesting this is all happening at the NATO conference?
	I thought NATO was about winning the Ukrainian war.
	No, that's just, they're at war with us.
	They're trying to take everything from us.
	And that is going to be their fallback position.
	To take us to war.
	That's another way that they take everything from us.
	Meanwhile, the New York Fed reports a successful months-long digital dollar test.
	And of course, as I said, for the longest time, they're rolling out the first step of CBDC this month.
	They've got about 55 banks that have signed up to this.
	It's another one of these solutions for which there isn't a problem.
	We don't need to have FedNow.
	We've got all kinds of things like Cash App and Zelle and other things.
	By the way, I think of those, if you'd like to donate to us, you can find those at thedavidknightshow.com.
	But you can send money 24-7, 365 to anybody anywhere already.
	You don't need FedNow.
	FedNow is the next step.
	They've got everything laid out here.
	They've got an end goal where they've got to have everything destroyed and rebuilt by 2030.
	They've got the intermediate steps put in place.
	And so this is just the next step.
	It's an inside job.
	It's chaos. And they're going to do it iteratively.
	And so this next iteration...
	Is the federal, you know, the central bank currency, the digital currency, the reworking of this.
	The whole purpose of this is to, you know, part of the central bank digital currency is to further increase the centralization and control of the Federal Reserve.
	Have them operating at the individual level with all of us.
	That's not what is happening with this rollout with FedNow.
	This is still what they call wholesale.
	So this is the Federal Reserve dealing with the banks, which they've been dealing with, but dealing with them in a different way, getting information about customers so that they can...
	Use that, but the big step is going to be when they go to the individual and you're directly dealing with the Federal Reserve and not really with a bank.
	They may allow the banks to have some veneer, some participation in this for some time as they gradually squeeze them out.
	Because they don't want to have opposition from them, they will give them a cut.
	But this is the way that totalitarians always work.
	That's what Hitler did. Hitler said, you know, Stalin just took everything from everybody.
	He doesn't know how to run everything. You know, we do it gradually, and we do it subtly, and, you know, we will eventually own and control everything.
	But, you know, we've got to bring these people along with us gradually.
	So, again, they're rolling out FedNow, which is the first step in that.
	That's happening this month.
	Interesting that there is a case that may be coming up before the Supreme Court that would stop at least the Security and Exchange Commission's war on crypto.
	And this is important even if you don't own crypto or don't get involved in it because it is necessary for them To shut down all other avenues.
	In the same sense, we should have all been outraged and paid attention to the fact that we had the one solution that was going to be allowed, and that was a vaccine.
	So everything else had to be demonized.
	It didn't matter if it was drugs that had been safely used for 60, 70 years.
	Things like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
	They had a very well-known safety profile.
	Not that they were without side effects, but that they were pretty minimal.
	But no, you can't have that.
	We're going to demonize that. We're going to mock that, saying it's horse medicine and all the rest of the stuff.
	While we demand...
	That you take our new, untested, novel genetic code injection.
	And so the same thing is happening now with this.
	You want to know if there's an agenda?
	You want to know if there's a conspiracy?
	Well, just take a look at how they're going to rush this through in response to a made-up crisis, and there's only going to be one solution.
	It's just so obvious.
	And so Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett are part of a group on the Supreme Court who may not smile, On the SEC's interpretation of the law.
	And so the SEC, they've got a lot of novel ways that they're trying to shut down crypto because it is an out that people could have.
	It is a competitor to their central bank digital currency.
	And it's one of the reasons why they made the fourth area the environment.
	We've got to tell everybody, we're all going to die...
	If there's cryptocurrency, because they're using computer resources.
	But just like the cruise ships that use 43% more than all the internal combustion engines in Europe combined, 63 cruise ships, they're not going to do anything about the cruise ships.
	And they're not going to do anything about, you know, the banks that are using this power or...
	The military-industrial complex, the intelligence agencies that are using all of this.
	They don't care about the power that is being used by anybody anywhere now except for cryptocurrency.
	So that's one area.
	That's the way that they galvanize public opinion, they think, against this.
	But they are now weaponizing the Security and Exchange Commission and banking regulators trying to dismantle the crypto industry.
	They have the... The Federal Reserve has refused to allow certain banks to participate in this, other banks that wanted to set themselves up as a way to get in and out of crypto.
	And then the SEC came in with some pretended regulatory moves.
	SEC Chairman Gary Gensler's apologist argued that the security laws from the 1930s have successfully adapted to the Internet era.
	Hence, they can adapt to crypto as well.
	This argument would carry weight if the SEC made similar adaptations to crypto as they did to the internet.
	But it's really being used, again, as we see everything in the Biden administration is being focused on eliminating any competitor to their centralized cashless monetary system.
	We will be right back.
	Let the seed in our homeland, boys, let it grow where all can see.
	Feed it with our devotion, boys, call it the Liberty Tree.
	It's a tall old tree and a strong old tree.
	And we are the sons, yes, we are the sons, the sons of liberty.
	The End
	Liberty, it's your move. it's your move.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	I want to thank Eric on Rockfin.
	Thank you very much, Eric, for the tip.
	I really appreciate that.
	It's very kind. If you would like to support us, there's a lot of different ways that you can do that.
	You can go to thedavidknightshow.com and that's very important for you to remember that and know that because as we look at the constant maneuvering and new regulations and new proposals of how to do censorship, they always talk about how we got to get a handle on podcasts and that day is coming.
	That day is coming, so when they shut that down, if you go to thedavidknightshow.com, we'll have some way for you to get the show, whatever they do to that.
	And of course, we're seeing some strange stuff happening now with Twitter, as Elon Musk is throttling it.
	If you don't have the $8 subscription, I guess they limit the amount of time that you can watch the program or something.
	Certainly, Twitter has become unusable for my wife, Karen, because she doesn't have a paid subscription to it.
	And so it is kind of interesting what is happening.
	It looks like he's trying to shoot himself in the foot or maybe shoot Twitter in the head.
	I don't know. But it doesn't cost anything to support us by liking the stream.
	Or leaving a nice comment somewhere where you get the podcast or one of the video platforms where you see it.
	And, of course, we have live broadcasts at DLive, not just on Twitter, as well as Odyssey, Rockfin, Rumble.
	We're live on all those different places.
	And if you like the stream, that helps our visibility.
	And that's something that we really need since everywhere we look we're being throttled and shadow banned and other things like that.
	That helps to get past that.
	If you just like the stream or leave a nice comment.
	And there's a lot of different places where you can download the podcast.
	I know most people listen to it rather than watch it.
	So wherever you watch it, if you would do that, that would help us a great deal.
	And don't forget that SubscribeStar is one of the key ways that we know what our budget is going to be.
	And so there's links to our account at SubscribeStar as well.
	You can leave tips there or you can sign up to support us on a monthly basis.
	From $5 on up, we've got different tiers that go up, and so that is a real key thing for us to know that we have that there.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is happening with the social movements.
	We just had another guy who's a governor of North Dakota who has entered the race, and he says, well, I don't think that presidents should get involved in the culture war.
	Well, Newsflash, they already are involved in the culture war and have been for quite some time.
	It is not a neutral situation.
	And if you're going to allow these organizations to continue, these institutions that we have in the federal government, if they're going to continue, they're going to continue to bribe and bully people and to push out their agenda, their curriculum, and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so it is not a culture war to say we've got to go back to the Constitution, we've got to stop this stuff.
	It is a culture war to continue it.
	And we see the results of the culture war.
	We've got now 43% of Brown University students say that they are LGBT. So this is a depopulation movement.
	As certainly as any of the injections or any of the other stuff that they have done in terms of our food, our environment, electromagnetic radiation, and the proliferation of that, certainly this is one of the key things.
	The sociological sterilization of the population through the LGBT issues.
	Between 2010 and 2023, students identifying as LGBT has almost tripled amongst the student body at Brown University and Ivy League school.
	From 14% in 2010 saying that they were not heterosexual to 38% now.
	And so that is not tripling.
	I don't know who wrote this, but Washington Examiner.
	Well, it's 14%.
	It's not 10%. I'm thinking it was 2010 was the year.
	So, yeah, from 14% to 38%.
	So it is nearly tripling.
	It would be almost 45% otherwise.
	But it is kind of interesting.
	And, you know, Yuval Harari...
	Yuval Noah Harari, who is an atheist, a homosexual, and a frequent speaker at the World Economic Forum, has said, this is the end of mankind.
	We're going to manipulate you.
	We're going to tell you what to do. Those of us who are in control are going to do it.
	And we're going to do this through video games and through drugs.
	We're going to keep you occupied so that you don't mess with us.
	And we'll do whatever we want to do.
	We'll keep you, you know, distracted.
	But it's not just video games and drugs.
	It's also the LGBT stuff.
	You know, you're sitting there, you know, figuring out, you know, what kind of weird outfit you're going to wear.
	Trying to figure out what gender you are.
	And of course, you're not having any kids, which is what they want.
	I've seen this thing for the longest period of time.
	You know, I talk about it being not Sodom and Gomorrah, but Sodom and go Marxist.
	I've seen this from my early days in college at USF. The people that had taken over the student government were the, what they called at the time, the gay coalition.
	This was before they had LGBT. So they were the gay coalition and the black student union.
	They were Marxists.
	So, you know, it was the sodomists and the Marxists that had taken things over.
	And, of course, you know, a big part of their Marxist agenda was racism everywhere.
	They took over the student body there, and there was a lot of money to be had because of student activity fees.
	And they were able to take it over because, at that time at least, USF, a lot of people were commuting on campus.
	They didn't have a whole lot of people that actually lived on campus.
	They didn't have any sports teams at the time.
	They do now. They've got a basketball team, they've got a football team, but it was still a big student body.
	They had about 25,000 students there.
	And I didn't live on campus either.
	I lived in the area and went there for engineering.
	But I still had to pay student fees.
	And so these people figured out that they could take over the student government and they could get access to these student fees.
	And they could basically create all kinds of activities and they could give themselves money.
	But it even got bigger than that.
	They wound up just flat out stealing the money with embezzlement.
	And that's become a template for the way that I've watched government operate my entire life.
	But now we have this really metastasizing as a cancer.
	It is a depopulation movement as well as a degeneracy movement.
	What we find is that the identity is rising much faster than the behavior they set.
	So I said this is really people's response to peer pressure and psychology.
	They said coming out as not heterosexual is trendy, and it wins social plaudits.
	But the notion that social pressure plays a role in LGBT identification is only controversial because this group is now a sacred cow.
	But we know that's the case.
	They said that the people, when they actually dug into this, I said, well, they're just kind of telling everybody that that's what they are.
	And they want to believe that because if you tell people that, then you are not ostracized.
	You're ostracized if you tell people that you are heterosexual.
	I said, for example, we look at the way this works.
	The American Lung Association always talked about marketing and pressure from friends.
	Think about how obsessive they were about Joe Camel, for example, right?
	As Jason Barker has pointed out many times, he said they pick these rainbow colors, these bright primary colors, because they want to track the attention of the kids.
	And of course, we've got a lot of pornographic material that is directly addressed to the kids.
	And if you stop it, they call you book banners.
	And if you stop them interacting with kids, they say that you're trying to commit genocide against them, and on and on.
	But look at how...
	They were, how angry they were about Joe Camel.
	They said, here's a cartoon character and you're targeting kids with Joe Camel.
	And he wasn't really even, it was really kind of a teen cartoon character.
	I mean, it wasn't young kids like they're doing with the LGBT stuff.
	And the younger kids are, the more susceptible they are to this.
	Peer relationships are linked to alcohol abuse, to smoking, tobacco, to drug use.
	And that's how they are running this thing through.
	But of course, as I said last week, they're using Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, saying use their own stuff against them.
	And so they know that Americans have accepted, as part of the culture, the values of Christianity, saying that we need to tolerate other people, we need to be nice to them, that type of thing.
	And they use that against us, and they talk about civil rights, except the civil rights are only for them.
	And once they get into power, they will take civil rights away from anybody that does not submit to them, bow to them, Anybody that does not play their dominance game.
	And we see this one particular individual who went to the UK. This is a British story about a devout Christian social worker, Felix Nogole, who had already won a landmark free speech case over his religious beliefs.
	He'd already had a run-in where somebody had tried to tell him what he could and could not say about his religion.
	He immigrated to the UK from Africa, and he was thrown off a social worker training course at a university because he put on his Facebook post, he quoted passages from the Bible about same-sex marriage.
	But then he won in court.
	He won the Court of Appeals.
	And now he's the father of three people.
	He got a job or was applying for a job at Leeds-based Touchstone Support as a mental health support worker.
	But the offer was rescinded weeks later when they discovered his involvement in the previous case and discovered that he was a Christian.
	They said his strong views against homosexuality did not align with their ethos and their values.
	and the group is an LGBT lobbying group called Stonewall Now, Stonewall is what they celebrate as the beginning of the LGBT movement for gay rights, as they say.
	But, of course, you must accept them, and you must accept their pronouns, and you must celebrate them, not just tolerate them.
	But they will not even tolerate you.
	If you disagree with them.
	And that's what we're seeing with this individual.
	He said, they portrayed me as someone who doesn't like people from the LGBT community and said that I was going to cause them harm.
	I was distraught. It's not who I am as a Christian.
	I would never discriminate against anyone.
	That's the opposite of what the Bible teaches.
	Sadly, they didn't give me that same respect in return.
	I cannot pledge my allegiance to the LGBT flag in order to get a job.
	And again, he sought asylum, political asylum in the UK, escaping from Cameroon.
	But they are not interested in a system of liberty and of rights.
	It's just they're looking at a system where they dominate other people.
	They will use our values in order to get into that position of dominance.
	And when we look at the universities, as these things are rolling out, the Board of Trustees at the new College of Florida, this is a college that, again, is kind of an offshoot of the one that I attended, University of South Florida.
	It's a small college, and DeSantis has gone there to take it over and to use it as kind of a test bed to see if there's some way that we can retake these institutions.
	And he's clearly aware that Of Antonio Gramsci's idea, the guy who was the founder of the Italian Communist Party and was the person that Pete Buttigieg's father spent his entire college career as a professor at Notre Dame worshipping Antonio Gramsci.
	And Gramsci came up with the idea that in order to make communism dominant, In the West, especially in the U.S., they had to march through the institutions.
	And so DeSantis has even referenced that.
	He understands that tactic.
	So they submitted a $2 million budget request to the state legislature for the new College of Florida in order to establish a freedom institute that will seek to combat cancel culture and higher education.
	And see, that's the thing.
	It's like, you know, even though The real approach, I think, is to get government completely out of education.
	There's too much money there. At least he's getting people aware of what the issue is.
	At least he's trying to take some action, some creative action.
	Even if he fails, And even if he misses the more obvious solution, which is to completely get government out of education, there should be no connection.
	If you don't have freedom of education, as I said before, you will never have freedom of religion, and you'll never have freedom of speech, freedom of thought.
	Education is so fundamental to all that stuff, and the government needs...
	There should be no Department of Education, just like there should be no Ministry of Truth.
	Because they'll both be used in the same way and that's not a theory.
	We've seen that illustrated over and over again.
	Thank you very much, Superfe.
	I appreciate that. That's very kind, generous.
	And, of course, Superfe was the one who did the matching funds towards the end of June.
	She said, support what you love or it will go away.
	I went to an Ivy League school, Harvard, and graduated in 2010 with my degree in psychology.
	As recently as that, I learned that gender dysphoria is a mental illness and it needs to be treated.
	Absolutely right. Yeah, you've got to support this stuff or it is going to go away.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. The new College Freedom Institute seeks to promote tolerance of opposing views and willingness to engage such views in civil discourse.
	At the human level, such tolerance is a necessary precondition for developing effective interpersonal relationships, and at a social level, such tolerance is a necessary component for a healthy democratic nation, said the agenda that they've put together for this.
	Look, universities used to pride themselves on On having debates, on searching for the truth, but now we are beyond that.
	Now we're post-objectivity.
	Now we don't believe that there is any absolute truth, and that is the only absolute truth that they'll push.
	And that has to be opposed.
	So, as you look at all this, I find it really strange, again, that this has been article after article over the weekend.
	This is a concerted movement.
	By the left to say that DeSantis has all but ruined his campaign by attacking LGBT and Trump.
	And it is amazing to me that MAGA cannot see this.
	They can't see.
	What he's trying to do is to point out to these people who are following Trump that he doesn't share their values and never has shared their values.
	He's not the person that he portrays himself to be.
	But he also criticized this agenda, and he's also opposed this agenda because this agenda is oppositional to children.
	It's oppositional to families and to parental rights and all the rest of this stuff.
	But they're all saying, well, he's got no chance of winning now.
	Really? How out of touch are these people with the mainstream?
	You know, as Super Faye was saying, we knew that this was mental illness.
	And it's just now been normalized.
	No, it still is mental illness.
	They want to tell us that Pride Month is not about division.
	It's not about conflict. It's not about altering reality and redefining everything.
	I mean, they've been redefining money.
	They're redefining what a vaccine is.
	And, of course, they make these redefinitions as part of their agenda.
	It gives them the moral high ground by setting the terminology, by setting the definitions, and they're constantly redefining themselves because they have to.
	When people find out who they are and what they're about, they don't want to have anything to do with them.
	While some might argue that Republicans do not need the support of the LGBT community to secure victory in 2024, this assumption is mistaken, says this article from RT. No, actually what you need is you need mainstream America to win this election, and they're still not mainstream America.
	There's still even a minority of the kids in the Ivy League schools that have had this hammered into them with peer pressure and other things.
	So, again, I, you know, You can look at this, and I know I've had a lot of people get very angry at me because I talk about this LGB tyranny coming from the trannies and what is happening to the family, what is happening to kids. But look, I don't need LGBT for this show.
	I'd rather go down than to pander to this stuff.
	And I'm not going to go to war with God over something and make some kind of calculation that I can compromise on this stuff.
	They said DeSantis, this is RT talking, DeSantis made a critical error by voicing some unsavory parts of his ideology.
	Because this approach alienates LGBT Republicans who make up approximately 15% of this demographic.
	Okay, so you're going to pander to the 15%, and you're going to tell the other 85% to shut up and sit down?
	Maybe this person needs a course in math, because 2 plus 2 does not equal 5, and 15% does not equal a majority.
	If you're going to talk about this as if it's an election, but no.
	The long cabin Republicans, I said, described as the nation's largest LGBT conservative organization, and they are fully on board with Donald Trump.
	But they're still a minority.
	Their concerns, he said, are valid.
	Many right-wing individuals have fallen in the trap of believing that the country is engaged in an existential battle against trans ideology or groomers, with DeSantis as a champion against these excesses.
	That's exactly what it is.
	Exactly what it is.
	They said, oh, quite the opposite.
	Whatever perceived culture war is taking place has long ago been decided.
	Has it? Has it?
	Are we now irrevocably?
	If you change the culture, can we not change it back again?
	It's not over. It's not over.
	And I think a lot of people had an awakening, ironically, via the lockdown.
	That's why I think a lot of parents finally realized that it wasn't just something that was happening in Washington.
	It wasn't just something that was happening at the state level or at the county level or something that the administrators were involved in or even something that was happening in another classroom in their kid's school, but they saw it happening in their kid's classroom.
	That's been the hardest lesson, the thing to get across to people who refuse to take their kids out of the schools.
	It's happening in your classroom.
	And even if it isn't happening right now, it could happen just like that with somebody that you don't know because you can't see it.
	But they saw what was happening in the various classrooms.
	Majority of Americans generally do not care about what goes on behind closed doors.
	Unfortunately, they don't care what's going on behind the closed schoolroom doors.
	And what is going on, what used to go on behind closed doors or the personal choices that individuals make, that's not behind closed doors anymore.
	You know, libertarians used to always say, well, get government out of the boardroom and out of the bedroom.
	Well, these people have come out of the bedroom and they haven't bothered to get dressed either or put on any clothes.
	And they're parading around the streets, literally parading around naked and in front of kids.
	So this is not a personal choice.
	It's now a public choice that they've made.
	And it's not about their private lives.
	They've made their private lives public, in your face, and they're demanding that you bow down.
	These people are just like Sam Britton, who likes to dress people up in chains and stuff and subjugate them.
	That's what's really happening with this stuff.
	And we've got to refuse to play along with it.
	As you got the new social media thing from Zuckerberg threads, you had libs of TikTok gone on and immediately got banned for saying that non-binary is not real.
	That's right. It's Bob.
	Biological, objective, and binary.
	That's what the reality is.
	But they didn't like the fact that she said that.
	And so she immediately gets kicked off.
	I wouldn't even bother to get onto that platform.
	And then over the weekend, we had this story.
	Washington Post.
	A small-town Georgia preacher fills the pews by leaving no one out.
	Well, of course, nobody is ever left out of any church.
	But these are churches that are leaving Jesus out.
	And these churches, they welcome everybody but Jesus.
	Because they don't want what he has to say about what these people are doing to kids.
	They don't want what he has to say about marriage and family.
	And they don't want to obey his commands.
	As he said, if you love me, keep my commands.
	These people love his name.
	But they don't like his commands.
	He's not welcome in their churches.
	It's absolutely amazing to see the full court press.
	And yet, it really is up to us, isn't it?
	Have a good day.
	Thank you for joining us.
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲