Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 17, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:00

17Apr23 Former Intel Official: Leak Was a Setup; GOP Candidates at NRA; Riots & Reparations

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	www.fema.org.au You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 17th of April, year of our Lord, 2023.
	Well, today I'm going to take a look at what has happened over the weekend.
	We've had a lot of interesting developments from politics.
	And I've got to say, as I look at the events over the weekend, Trump at the NRA, Trump Jr., baby Trump, say, hey, just lay off of Budweiser.
	They give us lots of money.
	I'm looking at this and saying, how did we get in this situation where the people who betrayed us for two years running throughout this pandemic and never delivered on what they wanted to do, betrayed the Second Amendment, betrayed every aspect of the Constitution, how were they still The people we're turning to for leadership, for salvation.
	Unbelievably... Well, we'll talk about that when we come back.
	Stay with us. I want to begin with the NRA over the weekend.
	Look, there's some real issues in terms of protecting the Second Amendment.
	These things are fundamental.
	They are not negotiable, except that the NRA has a long history of negotiating on these types of things.
	If you remember, Sheriff Mack, during the Clinton administration, fought against...
	New gun control registration rules and things like that.
	He fought all the way to the Supreme Court.
	The NRA was fine with what Clinton was doing.
	They didn't want to have that fight.
	And when it comes to the bump stock, the NRA didn't want to have that fight.
	They're now fighting about the pistol brace, but they didn't want to oppose Trump.
	It wasn't politically correct to do that.
	So they let Trump establish a precedent of gun control by executive order.
	And now they're all cheering each other.
	As if none of this stuff happened.
	And then we have Kristi Noem, who is absolutely delusional, and the people who cheered her in terms of what she had to say.
	It is as delusional as any of these transgender-pushing leftists, what they're pushing on kids, what she was pushing for kids.
	And so we're going to begin by taking a look at Trump.
	Let me play first for you What he had to say about the pistol brace.
	He's the most pro-gun president ever.
	And then he criticizes Biden for the pistol brace, which was basically doing the same thing Trump did with the bump stock.
	He set that precedent.
	So I was proud to be the most pro-gun, pro-Second Amendment president you've ever had in the White House.
	I think that's been acknowledged.
	And with your support, in 2024, I will be your loyal friend and fearless champion once again as the 47th president of the United States.
	Oh, they love it.
	Eliminate the Biden ATF's ridiculous pistol brace rule, which orders law abiding citizens to register or surrender guns with stabilizing braces.
	Right? Does everybody like that, or should I forget about it?
	Nah, one or two people like that, that he's going to oppose it.
	I don't know. They wanted me to put that in.
	I guess some people are happy with it.
	I don't know. Okay, so his speechwriters wanted him to put that in there to push back against the pistol brace, or maybe some people want the pistol brace.
	Is that what it is? It was a big crickets, essentially.
	You saw the difference. That first clip where he says, I'm the most pro-gun president ever.
	Big applause from the entire audience.
	And then when he talks about the pistol brace thing, one or two people clapped.
	And he starts ad-libbing.
	Oh, well, they wanted me to put that in there, I guess.
	So did the ATF come to him and say, here's our shopping list of things we'd like for you to start infringing?
	I'm not going to do the pistol brace.
	I'll do the bump stock. How about that?
	Was that it? Was that how that worked?
	Or was it his speechwriters who said, hey, don't talk about this, but now we can talk about it?
	What's the matter with the NRA people?
	They clearly don't understand what's going on.
	Look, gun owners of America opposed the bump stock because they understood what the precedent was.
	Michael Cargill, Central Texas Gunworks, just like Sheriff Mack, he took it on and did the lawsuit.
	Michael Cargill is a good guy.
	I've interviewed him.
	I know him personally. And didn't you take a carry class thing with him?
	No, that wasn't. Okay.
	Anyway, we've gotten guns from him in the past.
	And, yeah, he's the real deal.
	And he fought it. Trump is not the real deal.
	The NRA is not the real deal.
	These are political postures that they have.
	They don't defend our rights.
	As a matter of fact, they need to have our rights being threatened, right?
	The NRA needs the ATF. What would be their justification if he got rid of the organization, the unconstitutional organization that attacks your Second Amendment?
	What would be their rationale for existence?
	So, yeah.
	The Biden gun control agenda, said the NRA in a tweet, is part and parcel of left-wing crusade to weaponize government against law-buying citizens.
	Oh, it's not a problem when the most pro-gun president we've ever had stabbed us in the back.
	It's not a problem when the NRA stabs you in the back.
	I am sick of their compromises, and I'm sick of his lies and his betrayal.
	Yeah, so he puts that ad lib in there.
	Well, you know, they wanted me to put that in there.
	Now, then in the speech, besides the ridiculous stuff about the Second Amendment, I was done with Trump at that point in time.
	That was before 2020.
	And then they kept coming.
	The betrayals kept coming.
	The constitutional attacks kept coming.
	I should say the attacks on the Constitution.
	There was nothing constitutional about anything that he did in 2020.
	Not a thing. Every bit of it was a betrayal.
	Every bit of it was the globalist agenda.
	Every bit of it. Including the election garbage and the January the 6th stuff.
	But he starts listing out all of his wonderful accomplishments.
	And he's got to spend...
	About his vaccines.
	I guess we could call this new Operation Warp Spin.
	He doesn't talk about the COVID vaccines because he knows he's not going to get just silence.
	He's going to get booze, right?
	So he doesn't talk about Operation Warp Speed, but listen to how he tries to spin it and make you forget what he actually did with warp speed.
	The creation of Space Force, that was a big deal.
	That was a big deal.
	And so many other things.
	Even Right to Try. I hope nobody needs it.
	Right to Try. Where you can use this advanced medical treatments that won't be approved for five or six years by the FDA. But we got them to move a lot faster, I will tell you on everything.
	But won't be approved by the FDA for years.
	And we've saved thousands and thousands of lives with Right to Try.
	But we did a lot. We did a lot.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah.
	So you see what he's...
	Yeah, he didn't get much of an applause there.
	Maybe they understand what's going on with that.
	He doesn't talk about the fact that he...
	I told these guys at the FDA, you approve this now, you're fired.
	He doesn't talk about any of that stuff.
	No. No, they had the right to try.
	And so we did that. So you didn't have to wait five or six years for these drugs if you want to try it.
	You got the right to try it. That's completely different than what he did with warp speed.
	Now, many people have said, look, you've got to...
	You got something that looks like a promising cancer treatment.
	You know, let's not stand on formalities.
	If people want to try this in a terminal situation, that's their determination, right?
	And what that is saying is we're not going to have the bureaucracy get in the way of a doctor-patient relationship.
	If there's something out there they want to try it, we'll let them try it.
	We'll inform them what it is and we'll let them try it.
	That's completely different than shutting down the doctor-patient relationship.
	That's completely different than putting out a novel genetic code injection and telling everybody it's safe and effective when you haven't even tested it.
	You lied to our faces.
	All of you that did that, especially Trump.
	That's completely different from right to try.
	And that's the elephant in the elephant room.
	That vaccine, that Trump shot, that shot.
	Sent round the world.
	That's the elephant in the elephant room.
	And it's an elephant not just for Trump.
	It's an elephant for all these people who fell in line, didn't want to criticize it as long as it was Trump.
	And then when Biden said, well, you're going to have to get it.
	Oh, well, you know, I'm all for the vaccine and I'm all for science and that type of thing.
	But, you know, hey, we don't want to mandate that you've got to take it.
	I tell you what, I'm sick and tired of these people who are these Machiavellian manipulators who figure out what they can do to make themselves look good to the crowd as they're pushing them into the slaughter pens and making sure that they don't get pushed into the slaughter pen themselves by the people who actually run the system.
	And then he talked about Oh, by the way, let me just show this, too.
	This is a meme that goes around.
	Ten stages of genocide.
	You can quibble with the aspects of it, but I think it's pretty accurate.
	You know, it talks about...
	And let me just ask you this.
	When you look at the ten stages of genocide, how many of these stages, as I read these out, do you think Trump put us through in 2020?
	Classification, where people are divided into us and them.
	Hmm. The masked versus the unmasked.
	The people who want to lock down versus the people who don't.
	The people who don't agree with his pandemic designation.
	The us versus them.
	That's number one. Number two, symbolization.
	People are forced to identify themselves.
	Well, that worked pretty well with the masks.
	You can instantly identify who the us and the them were with a mask that Trump was pushing and wearing himself.
	He had a presidential seal on his cloth mask.
	Number three, discrimination.
	People began to face systematic discrimination.
	Sorry, you can't go here.
	You can't go there. You can't do this.
	You can't do that if you don't have your mask.
	Then it became the vaccine under Biden.
	Same thing. Number four, dehumanization.
	People are equated with animals, with vermin, or disease, right?
	And not just to think about, well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here.
	No. Screw your freedom.
	Yeah. From the literal Nazi.
	From the literal Nazi.
	Anyway... Organization.
	The government creates specific groups, police, military, to enforce policies.
	Oh, that didn't happen under Trump, did it?
	Oh, yeah, it did. Polarization.
	The government broadcasts propaganda to turn the populace against the group.
	Trump spent $250 million on the Ad Council campaigns.
	There'd never been anything close to that.
	This is your mind on drugs.
	Just say no.
	Smokey the Bear. None of that stuff ever even came close.
	Probably more than all of them combined, even in terms of real dollars.
	Number seven, preparation.
	Official action to remove and to relocate people.
	You mean like quarantine stuff?
	Persecution. Beginning of murders, theft of property, and trial massacres.
	Well, we didn't see that, did we? You mean...
	Putting people in quarantine, putting people on ventilators for money.
	Folks, that was murder.
	That was pushed by Trump.
	It was murder. It was absolute, literal murder.
	90% of the people dying on the ventilators.
	Extermination. Wholesale elimination of the group.
	It is extermination, not murder because the people are not considered to be human.
	Screw your freedom.
	We're talking about the herd here, right?
	How about the herd? Got to get that vaccine number.
	And then when they got to their herd immunity, which that number was always very flexible.
	Is it 60%?
	Is it 70%?
	Is it 80%? People got to get it.
	Then when they got their numbers, they said they stopped talking about it.
	Stopped talking about it.
	And denial. The government denies that it has committed any crime.
	That's where we are right now. That's where we are with Trump as he goes to the NRA. And then there was a third and final thing that he said as he was speaking to the NRA. He started talking about his Afghanistan withdrawal.
	That's right, it didn't happen, did it?
	The guy is...
	Is he going through some kind of a drug withdrawal or something?
	This is his fantasy life.
	And the people just eat it up.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah, Trump got us out of Afghanistan.
	Biden put us back in there and then messed the whole thing up, didn't he?
	Yeah, I guess that's the way it happened.
	So let's take a look at his Trumpistan project where he was going to get us out of Afghanistan.
	And we were going to get out with pride and with dignity.
	We were going to take all of our equipment out.
	I told the generals I want every screw.
	I want every bolt.
	I want every tank. I want every plane.
	I want every helicopter.
	I want everything out.
	Sir, can we leave the hangars?
	You know, those big canvas-covered hangars.
	Nope, they come out, General.
	Sir, I think it would be a lot easier to leave the equipment behind.
	This was Milley. That's when I realized he's a fool.
	I said, so you mean to tell me, General, that if we have a hundred million dollar airplane sitting there, you want to leave that, and you think that's a good thing.
	Leave the airplane, leave the helicopters, which they did.
	Leave all of this very expensive.
	We could just fill it up with a little jet fuel and fly it to Pakistan or fly it home.
	Yes, sir, I think it would be a good idea to leave it.
	That's where these ideas came from.
	Can you imagine? We left $85 billion worth of equipment In Afghanistan.
	And I just read a report the other day that they are about the second largest seller of arms in the whole world.
	We sell more than they do, a little bit.
	I don't know what happened in that video.
	It was out of sync at the beginning, and then it got totally out of sync, and then it got in sync at the beginning.
	I put that stuff together pretty fast.
	It was pretty early this morning, so I don't know why.
	But you heard the clips there, right?
	Don't leave a single screw there!
	Hey, Trump, you didn't take a single screw out, you screwball.
	You're screwing with our heads.
	What a liar.
	What a liar. Oh, yeah, he had it all worked out.
	He did Afghanistan perfectly, didn't he?
	Yeah, well, I guess so, because, you know, the opioid supply was record, you know, while he was there.
	Every year, new level.
	So I guess he was doing Afghanistan in the right way.
	Because that's what the CIA wanted, and he gives the CIA whatever it wants.
	Gina Haspel at the top and all the rest of the stuff, they wanted the opioids done, so he got that done.
	We're going to get every single poppy out of there.
	Not going to leave any of it behind.
	Johnson& Johnson needs it for their opioid epidemic.
	I've got to get it to the Sackler brothers.
	The CIA needs the money for their dark ops.
	We're not going to leave any of that stuff behind.
	Then they got thrown out on their ear, left all that stuff behind.
	People got killed with the fire drill that was done.
	Trump was going to get us out of Afghanistan.
	Four years and he didn't do it.
	But now he's talking about, he's the big man.
	So what was it that happened, Trump?
	You couldn't stand up to this little guy Milley or something?
	You'd say Milley is a bad guy?
	You know, he's just pathetic.
	He doesn't know what he's doing. You couldn't stand up to him, could you?
	Couldn't stand up to him.
	How pathetic is that?
	You're worse than this guy you're criticizing.
	If he's not taking your orders, you fire him.
	Oh, yeah. Anyway, that's part of his NRA thing.
	He vows to end the war on guns.
	What a joke. End the ATF. As a matter of fact, Rama Swami got that right.
	So we need to end the ATF. Nobody else there that day.
	We'll talk about all the different politicians parading themselves before the crowd at the NRA. The only one to say, got to end the ATF, was Ramaswamy.
	Don't know if he would do it or not.
	Certainly the president has the power to do that because these organizations are all under the executive branch and they are unconstitutional to boot.
	The ATF's entire mission statement Is at odds in violation of the Second Amendment.
	Everything they do is designed to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
	So he was not the only speaker there.
	He's going to end the war on guns, right?
	I guess he'd do it with an executive order.
	He can't. Could he end the ATF with an executive order?
	If he can violate the Constitution with an executive order that is carried out by the ATF? That's an interesting legal question, isn't it?
	Inquiring minds want to know.
	Well, of course he could. He gave them pretended superpowers now.
	We don't even have to, you know, worry about Congress violating the Constitution with laws.
	We can now violate the Constitution with rules from the executive branch.
	And I said when it happened, I said now that Trump has done this, You're going to see the Democrats do it over and over again.
	Biden has done it now, I think, three times that he's put stuff up.
	He did the pistol brace. He did ammunition.
	I think there was another one. Maybe it's two times.
	But immediately after Trump did that, Lala Harris was running at the time, and she said, when I become president, I'm going to give Congress 100 days to do all my gun control prohibition stuff.
	And if they don't do it, I'll do it by executive order.
	I said, where'd she get that idea?
	I said, it didn't even take a week or two for Lala Harris, as stupid as Lala Harris is.
	It didn't even take two weeks for her to put two and two together and say, hey, Trump, the Republican, did gun control by executive order and the NRA didn't even make a peep about it.
	That means I can do the same thing as a Democrat.
	And I've got a long list of things I would like to do.
	That's the danger of all this.
	And so Mike Pence went there.
	He spoke. And he was roundly booed.
	And then when he got over the booing, he said, the Trump-Pence administration did this, and the Trump-Pence administration did that.
	I was like, you betrayed us more than any.
	You are more anti-gun than even the Democrats.
	Even the Democrats didn't try to do gun control by executive order before Trump because they knew they couldn't get away with it.
	That's the function that Trump served.
	For the establishment, for the global establishment.
	He did things like gun control by executive order, lockdown, the vaccine, and everybody just shut up about it because, hey, it's Trump.
	And you don't want to criticize Trump because next thing you know, he's going to be criticizing the way you eat pudding or something.
	He actually did that. They've actually, Amaga PAC has actually got an ad out there criticizing DeSantis for the way he eats pudding.
	This is how, it's not even juvenile.
	It's infantile.
	Nobody can see what the issues are.
	Yeah, because we're talking about people eating pudding with their fingers or something, allegedly.
	And so one person, Aaron Rupar, put it out.
	Whoa, Pence is getting booed loudly at the NRA event.
	And so, you know, he handled it gracefully.
	But again, he continued to lie about his record.
	I wonder what Pence had to say about gun control by executive order.
	He didn't say that he pushed against Trump on that.
	He didn't say, well, I told President Trump that was a really bad idea.
	Pence is talking about how great it was and trying to take credit as a co-Trumper.
	And then they said for someone who wasn't on stage, Ron DeSantis had a great response from the crowd as well.
	This is a summary from BearingArms.com.
	Receiving cheers when his video was introduced, DeSantis proudly touted his record as governor, including signing constitutional carry into law earlier this year.
	And they put constitutional carry in quotes because they said it's something that some Second Amendment activists in Florida would take issue with, given that open carry...
	It's still prohibited in Florida, even with a carry license.
	So how is that constitutional carry?
	It isn't. And see, that's one of the issues I have with DeSantis.
	Every time he'll do the right thing, but he'll only do a little bit of it, right?
	So we're going to have constitutional carry, but where you don't have to get a permit.
	But you can't open carry.
	Even if you get a license, you can't open carry.
	This has kind of turned the whole thing on its head, you know?
	The whole way that they got into this, well, you've got to have a permit to carry a gun, was because it was concealed, right?
	I mean, you think about it.
	You go back to the Good West.
	They like to call it the Wild West.
	I like to call it the Good West.
	Where everybody was carrying arms and it really was only a problem with some gunfighters and some, you know, the vigilantes and things like that.
	But for the most part, the Wild West was a lot more peaceful than Chicago.
	I've got some clips to show you of Chicago and what happened over the weekend.
	There wasn't any Wild West town that was that bad.
	And it was...
	You know, we would have the things like shootout at the OK Corral where you have several belligerents killed.
	And that was legendary because it was unaccustomed, right?
	It was unusual for that type of thing to happen.
	And so, you know, people were used to carrying openly with their guns.
	If somebody was carrying something concealed, you know, they got a Derringer up their sleeve or something.
	It's like, what are you up to?
	You're trying to make us think that you're not armed?
	You know, you need to show your arms.
	And if you want to keep it concealed, well, maybe we ought to start making that a criminal offense unless this person's character and background has been vetted.
	And that's how they came in to these carry permits.
	It was to have a permit to carry concealed, because what are you trying to conceal here?
	Is there some deception that's going on?
	You're trying to pull something off here on people?
	And so now, in Florida, even if you've got to carry license, you can't carry openly, openly.
	What is that about?
	Well, that is based on the attitude that everybody is afraid of guns.
	We were at the grocery store on Saturday, and there was a middle-aged woman there with her teenage daughter, and she was openly caring on her hip.
	I was like, good, good for you.
	You know, I think open carry kind of makes you a target sometimes if somebody's up to something.
	But still, you know, she was able to do that.
	Nobody freaked out.
	This is Tennessee.
	It's rural Tennessee.
	Maybe in Nashville or Memphis.
	Maybe even in Knoxville. I don't know.
	But good for her.
	New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu was there.
	A lot of his speech, says Bearing Arms, was dedicated to laying out his own positive vision of, quote, a new generation of leadership.
	And Frank talked about needing to appeal to independent voters and the undecideds.
	And so, again, this is one of the reasons, like I said, Chris Christie said pretty much any Republican can beat Biden except Trump, in his opinion.
	Why? Because you are not going to get the independent voters and the undecideds.
	Nobody is undecided about Trump.
	Very polarizing figure.
	And it's going to be very easy to pull away the additional votes that you need to get a majority if you got Trump there.
	Yes, MAGA may love him dearly.
	They may love him more than anyone or anything else, but they only get one vote even if you have an honest election.
	Even if. And that's a big if.
	That's why I say, you know, don't focus on the presidents.
	But we do need to understand how these people are deceiving us.
	And then you had Ramaswamy.
	He says, well, I didn't get a chance to catch his speech, but he did call to abolish both the FBI and the ATF. Of course, he wants to replace the FBI with something new.
	Abolish it and replace it with nothing.
	You know, you could have a consult.
	You could call it the Consulting Detective Agency.
	You could call them the Sherlock...
	Homeland Security, a home security or something, right?
	Let them have the, you know, send some stuff to them if you need some technical help to vet some evidence or compare it or something.
	Otherwise, you know, there's not even any authority for that in the Constitution.
	But the ATF, absolutely.
	They said, so abolish the two of them, enshrine constitutional carry, and arm every Taiwanese citizen to stop an invasion from China.
	I mean, he made a good point with that, right?
	If everybody in Taiwan has...
	And he's not the first one to think of that.
	There's actually a Taiwanese billionaire who's actually doing the best he can to do exactly that.
	Getting small arms in the hands of the Taiwanese and teaching them how to use them.
	If you've got a militia, if you've got a real citizen's militia, the Chinese are not going to be able to occupy that country.
	Just that simple. And it would be a good deterrent if they were to do something like that.
	And then he says, the comments on bearing arms says, seems like he was trying just a little bit too hard to toss out red meat to his audience.
	Ramaswamy was, he said.
	Perhaps understandable, given that he acknowledged growing up in a household without guns and only recently purchased one for himself.
	Who cares? He seems to understand the Second Amendment better than any of these politicians.
	Does Trump ever buy a gun?
	No, I don't think so.
	The bottom line is, you don't need a typewriter to defend the First Amendment, do you?
	And I use that as an example.
	I know nobody uses typewriters anymore.
	You don't need a keyboard. You don't need a computer.
	You don't need to write. You don't need to have a blog.
	You don't need to have a press organization or be a journalist or whatever to understand the importance of the free press.
	You don't need to be actively commenting on a blog or on social media to understand the importance of free speech.
	And you don't need to have a gun to understand the importance of the Second Amendment either.
	So, again, I don't see that as a knock against him.
	I thought it was kind of odd that this writer would bring that up.
	And then that brings us to Christy Noem, who is there because she wants to run for vice president.
	Let's just be honest about that.
	And that's really what Nikki Haley is doing as well.
	She's putting herself out there, trying to get votes, saying, well, you know, look, if I get some votes, I get some support, I get some money, that moves me up the list to become a vice presidential pick.
	Because I check a lot of the diversity boxes.
	Isn't that wonderful? And so, Kristi Noem gets there, and she does something that I think was probably the most ridiculous thing of all.
	Let me just play the clip for you first and then I'll comment on it.
	Little Miss Addie, who is almost two, and Branch, who's just a few months old, they have brought us so much joy.
	They've brought us purpose.
	Now Addie, who, you know, soon will need them, I want to reassure you, she already has a shotgun and she already has a rifle.
	And she's got a little pony named Sparkles too, so the girl is set up.
	What is that about?
	You mean you got a shotgun for your two-year-old?
	You don't have a shotgun yet for the little guy who's only a couple months old?
	What's the problem? He can't pull the trigger?
	Can the little two-year-old pull the trigger?
	That's just the dumbest thing I have ever heard in my life.
	Left her open to criticism, and rightfully so, I think.
	I couldn't see anywhere where she said...
	I just got it for them because it's a, you know, it's a toy.
	I'm talking about a toy.
	Or we got it for them and, you know, we're putting it up in storage.
	You know, this is something, the purchase that we've made for the future, whatever.
	What?
	Do you remember when Biden came out and said, ladies, you don't want an AR-15.
	Get a shotgun, right?
	And they had all these pictures of women getting knocked flat on their back because they didn't, you know, brace the shotgun properly.
	They weren't prepared for the amount of kick.
	And then they juxtapose that with women who were shooting AR-15s and that type of thing.
	So, I don't know, maybe you should get Little Miss Addie in AR-15.
	That'd probably be even a bigger hit with the NRA.
	I put that out.
	I said, this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen in my life.
	This is as ridiculous as these parents who say, my little two-year-old, she's almost two.
	And she already knows she's the wrong gender.
	And we're going to fix that.
	This is projection.
	This is using your kids, your grandkids.
	It's despicable. Let's understand...
	The children don't have rights because they don't have judgment and they don't have responsibility.
	There is no such thing as children's rights.
	And this has been the UN's trajectory for controlling kids at a very young age from the very beginning.
	The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child has been signed by every country except the United States.
	But children don't have rights.
	That's why the parents need to be making the decisions for the kids.
	The reason that they claim that kids have rights is because they want to take them over.
	I don't think she's any better doing that kind of garbage than these parents who are out there saying, yeah, my little two-year-old already is on the wrong body, so we're already planning to mutilate and sterilize the kid.
	By the way, Elon Musk, it's just amazing.
	He says the right thing, and then does just the opposite.
	You know, he's out there. He does this great job of nailing this BBC journalist pushing censorship.
	Nailed him to the wall.
	Oh, yeah? Yeah, people say that?
	Give me one, you know? And you just want to be the one who's going to decide what people get to say, that type of thing.
	Did a great job of doing that.
	And yet, Elon Musk is the one deciding what people want or can say.
	And as I pointed out last week, MRC-TV... Quoting a study that somebody else had done as well, shows that censorship is actually worse under Musk than it was a year ago, and the punishments are more severe.
	And there was one particular case that showed that, where you had a guy that the Indian government did not want his information to go out.
	The Indian government demanded that he be censored on Twitter, and on Twitter they did it worldwide, not just in India.
	Completely subservient to government censors.
	Pretending, as he did in that interview with the BBC, that, no, we got a totally free speech platform.
	And then putting together a letter, getting a thousand scientists on board saying, you know, this AI thing is getting out of hand.
	We need to slow this down.
	Let's wait for six months. I talked about it at the time.
	I said, six months? Come on. That's ridiculous.
	That wouldn't change anything, even if you could get people to agree to it.
	They're not going to agree to it.
	And then the next day or so comes out, well, he's planning on getting 10 or has purchased 10,000 GPUs.
	And then late Friday, it came out that Elon Musk has set up X.AI because he wants everything under X. It will be the one app to rule us all.
	It'll do speech, and it'll rule our speech.
	It'll be the competitor to PayPal, which, you know, originally he had a payment program.
	It was called X that merged, and out of that they created PayPal.
	But he kept the X domains and stuff.
	So, you know, it's going to be the one app to rule us all.
	And so now he's got X.ai that he's founded.
	Right after he's got this open letter, well, let's put it all on six-month moratorium.
	Why is he doing that? Does he need to catch up a little bit to everybody?
	Hey, guys, wait six months so I can catch up to you.
	Is that what that was about? I don't know.
	But anyway, Kristi Noem puts out a tweet.
	I may be a mom and a grandma, but I am the NRA. Well, I'm not.
	I don't support the NRA. Never have.
	Never given them a dime because I've seen how they betrayed us.
	Going back to the Brady Bills, as I said, you know, where Sheriff Mack pushed the stuff on that.
	Gun Owners of America, now they're a different story.
	National Association for Gun Rights actually did some work for them.
	They're a good organization as well.
	NRA is a sellout.
	Sellout. It's good to have strength in numbers.
	That's all I can say. But you know what?
	If everybody were to coalesce around Gun Owners of America or the National Association for Gun Rights instead of the NRA, we'd be a lot more effective.
	And then we take a look at what's going on here in Tennessee.
	We've got Governor Lee trying to go to the, you know, take the gun and do the due process later thing that Trump did, the red flag law.
	So he can always fall off on the other side in terms of trying to do appeasement.
	And now the Tennessee governor is doing exactly that.
	He's asked the legislature to deliver him a proposed red flag law.
	Well, at least he doesn't presume to be able to do it on his own.
	It's not clear why Governor Bill Lee, who claims to support the Second Amendment, would propose a red flag law at this time.
	The circumstances indicate potentially two reasons, said John Harris, who's with an organization to fight for our gun rights here in Tennessee.
	He said, first, the Covenant School shooting fatalities have generated public emotional response, something that he referenced in his April 11th statement.
	Second, activist Democrat state legislators Are making a demand that more gun control be enacted now.
	So that's why he's doing it.
	Obviously, we all know that. He's either, you know, appeasing the radical Democrats.
	This guy, by the way, is the executive director of the Tennessee Firearms Association.
	Maybe I should get him on.
	Maybe I should join that.
	Anyway, yeah, he's calling it like it is.
	He said the red flag law would likely be unconstitutional.
	Why? Well, the Supreme Court case that just came out, Bruin, which New York State has been fighting so much, they lost that case and they're still trying to claw back their gun prohibition aspects on that.
	The Bruin case, the Supreme Court made it clear That if the activity, such as personal ownership or possession of a firearm, if the activity is within the scope of the Second Amendment's protections, then the burden is on the government to prove that a proposed or existing law is consistent with the nation's historical tradition for firearm regulation as of the time that the Second Amendment was adopted, 1791.
	Absent a showing that we were doing this red flag and take the due process later stuff in 1791, if you can't show that, well, absent that, according to Bruin, then the regulation would be unconstitutional.
	Governor Lee has not met that burden and has made no public effort to do so.
	He's just pushing for the red flag appeasement thing.
	I guess we could say he's taking yet another toll on our rights, this guy who's Governor Lee pushing toll roads in Tennessee, one of 14 states that didn't have them.
	One of the things I liked about it when I moved here.
	He wants to put toll roads in.
	That tells you, in my opinion, who he's with.
	I said that from the very beginning.
	You go back and you look at the...
	What is his name? Tom Tillis, North Carolina Senator.
	He rose up after I left.
	But again, you know, in 2010, you had the Republicans get a majority of the state Senate, and it was a census year.
	And so, the only thing that didn't change that year, they had voted, North Carolina had voted in 2008 for Obama, then in 2010, they had buyer's remorse, and they went radically Republican on everything, except Congress.
	Congress didn't change because of the gerrymandering, but then they changed that.
	Republicans got control of the legislature in a census year, and so for the first time since the Civil War, they had A Republican legislature the next election.
	However, what I remember was I knew the guy who had been the House Minority Leader, Skip Stamm in North Carolina.
	Solid guy.
	Honest guy. Straight up conservative.
	And all of a sudden, this guy, Tom Tillis, gets handpicked over him.
	He had been fighting the majority of Democrats for a long time, and all of a sudden, Tom Tillis, when they get the majority, gets put in as Speaker of the House.
	It's like, what's up with that?
	And it didn't take too long.
	It was after I left, but it didn't take too long to find out what was going on with Tom Tillis.
	He started pushing toll roads.
	Why? Well, that's part of the globalist agenda, right?
	Where they take over the infrastructure, take over the roads, take over everything.
	And then it wasn't but just a couple of cycles after that that they pushed Tom Tillis up to run for Senate.
	And he's been there ever since in North Carolina.
	Tennessee legislature has sent a school safety bill to the governor, however.
	And I'm hoping that they're not going to do anything about gun control.
	The Speaker of the House in Tennessee said, well, yeah, we'll think about something.
	But the The Senate Majority Leader, the Republican, had said when this first happened, well, what are you going to do in terms of new guns?
	Well, we're not even going to consider anything until 2024.
	And I hope he sticks to that.
	And I hope that the Republicans in an election year will just shut up and sit down when it comes to gun control.
	They don't need to be pushing this.
	They don't need to be pandering to this.
	They're not going to appease the Democrats.
	By the way, these radical Democrats who...
	At the same time, you had a mob take over the Kentucky legislature, and that was all about the transgender stuff.
	In Tennessee, they decided, well, maybe we better not do the transgender thing, since the transgender crazy nut was the one who was the murderer.
	Let's go after the tool that the crazy nut used.
	Let's go after guns. And so they had that big brouhaha, a mob going in and taking over the legislature.
	They kicked out these two guys.
	One of those guys now comes out in 2020.
	When the riots were going, and, you know, they were mostly peaceful.
	Well, he was riding in the streets and attacking cars.
	In one particular instance, they had some footage that's now surfaced of him grabbing a traffic cone and attacking a motorist with it through the window.
	He was charged with assault and various other things.
	But, you know, his defense was he was mostly peaceful, you know, just like all the rest of the BLM Marxists.
	The Black Lying Marxist.
	That's what BLM stands for.
	And so, you know, that's what these guys are made of.
	They should have been kicked out.
	They should have never been left back in.
	So anyway, they were the successor to themselves.
	How does that make sense?
	You can't secede yourself.
	In the aftermath of Nashville, what they've decided to do is to put some school safety measures in.
	They are going to, it's not just for public schools, it's going to be private schools and everything, require them to submit security plans and focus on hardening the facilities.
	The Senate Minority Leader It's a woman named Ramesh Akbari.
	I wonder where she's from.
	What part of Tennessee she's from.
	A Democrat. So we've got our own little Ilhan Omar.
	You haven't heard of the Nashville Akbari's?
	It's an old and storied family.
	Go all the way back to...
	Yeah, they go all the way back, don't they, to the very beginning here.
	Anyway, she, in bearing arms, I said, you know, she was actually smart about this, to her credit.
	She said, all right, we'll approve this bill for greater security, you know, and approve it.
	And like a lot of Democrats who say, no, I'm not going to vote for that because, you know, we want to have this other stuff.
	No, she voted for it.
	The bill includes a mandate for bulletproof glass on the first floor of all new and renovated schools as well as at least one double entry door, but not for armed teachers.
	So, I don't know, you know, when you've got bulletproof glass everywhere.
	Is that something that I understand that at this particular school they had a glass door and the shooter shot it out and that's how the shooter got in.
	If you're going to put bulletproof glass everywhere, what happens if they get inside then and you've got, I don't know, say some snipers who would like to take out the shooter who's holding kids hostage, but they can't because then the shooter's behind bulletproof glass.
	You see, the glass, the problem, no matter what you do in terms of security, in terms of gun prohibition and all the rest of it, the problem is the heart.
	The problem is our society.
	And if you don't understand the problem is our society, I've got some clips I'm going to show you of Chicago.
	The problem, we as met the enemy, and they as us.
	The problem is what we're teaching kids in the school and what we're not teaching kids in school.
	And the problem is that parents aren't teaching their kids any morality.
	They're not teaching them that they're going to have to stand before God and answer for what they do.
	Instead, you know, hey, we'll ship them off to school and it's done.
	You better keep them safe. Better lock them up because, you know, everybody is doing whatever they think they can get away with.
	If we have problems with kids, we'll put them on some SSRIs.
	They'll do murder-suicide.
	Let's mess with their minds and their bodies psychologically, sexually, all the rest of this stuff.
	They're manufacturing monsters.
	It's a seminary for Satan.
	That's the problem with the schools.
	You don't need to make the schools secure.
	You need to shut them down because you can't handle it.
	The government shouldn't be in the business of educating children any more than the government should be in the business of running churches and running religion.
	It's the same thing.
	Same thing. We're at the point now where most of the original 13 states were.
	In terms of religious freedom, when Thomas Jefferson did his religious freedom, and that was, you know, most of them were not requiring people to go to an official state-established church, but you still had to pay for it.
	And so we're now at the point where attendance is not required in these government schools, but you still got to pay for it.
	And that's an outrage.
	And it's also what they're being taught is full-on evil.
	We already know the Nashville killer looked at another school and dismissed it because the security was too tight.
	Tightening security across the state will protect children there.
	I'm not opposing that.
	I'm just saying they don't understand what the real problem is.
	The real problem is not the schools.
	The real problem is not glass doors.
	The real problem is the kind of people that we're turning out in our society.
	And the One of the key components of that manufacturing process, the manufacturing of monsters, is coming from the schools.
	That shooter was no longer in the school, but I'm sure that shooter was greatly affected by being in schools.
	And when we look in schools, right now we have this case, and it came out towards the end of the week.
	I think it came out on Thursday.
	You had some man who is in the process of trying to pretend that he's a woman.
	He's quote-unquote transitioning.
	And this teacher in a Florida middle school threatened to kill himself and threatened to kill students.
	And the parents, it now turns out, weren't notified.
	This incident happened even before the transition Insanity, where the trans person shot up this Christian school.
	This happened a couple of days before it.
	And the teacher was sent home for a day to cool off, but that's it.
	That's it. Did any of you use a red flag gun law on this person?
	And the person did have guns.
	So an officer responded to a report from the assistant principal and from the guidance counselor.
	He said the teacher had made statements about harming himself and possibly shooting the students.
	That reminds me, should we have background checks for teachers?
	Can they do more damage?
	I think they can. Can they do more damage with what they do to our kids?
	Mentally? Socially?
	Psychologically? Spiritually?
	Physically? Sexually? Can they do more damage to kids than most gun owners can?
	Certainly as much.
	Why don't we have any background checks for teachers?
	You've seen all these teachers that are on TikTok?
	Libs of TikTok will show these teachers out there.
	Obviously nobody's doing a background check, or if they're doing a background check for them, that's what they want.
	Anyway, the teacher was in the process, is in the process, of changing from male to female, or at least in their mind, in their multiple personality mind.
	The teacher admitted to having bad thoughts, but denied threatening to shoot students and said, quote, she does not want to harm herself as a man.
	This is like Norman Bates.
	Norman is setting in the police station.
	They'll say, I wouldn't hurt a fly.
	You know, that type of thing.
	So you've got a school system that has Norman Bates teaching your kids, get your kids out of the schools!
	Because the parents didn't know.
	They didn't know the teacher had made threats to kill himself and the students, and they were not told for quite some time.
	They're now just learning it. According to the report, the Hernando County School District's mental health coordinator conducted a threat assessment.
	And, you know, hey, look, if this person...
	Is transitioning?
	Well, they're good.
	I mean, that's what we want everybody to do, right?
	Obviously, got their head on straight if they're in the wrong body and, you know, want to transition to a different body or sex or gender or whatever, then that person is good to go.
	Let's have them teaching our kids.
	Now, pass the mental health coordinator's inspection.
	Her name is Sandra Hurst.
	I mean, she's the coordinator for a whole district.
	I mean, that obviously implies she's qualified to diagnose someone like this.
	Well, she's probably coordinating a lot of people to do exactly this type of thing.
	They're pushing these people over the edge, and they're certifiably nuts anyway.
	They're insane. Let's just stop pretending anything else.
	And as I said from the very beginning of all this stuff, you think you're...
	Napoleon, well, don't expect me to march to your drummers, okay?
	In your mind. Not going to do it.
	The sheriff's office, which did nothing, confirmed that this guy's brother works for them.
	Oh, well, maybe that had something to do, too.
	He's got friends in high places there.
	The teacher was reportedly back in the classroom the very next day, and it wouldn't be for more than a week until parents would be even notified of what had happened.
	Most found out from a local news story that was broken by journalist Tom Lemons who cited anonymous sources.
	So, again, unless the journalist had told people, nobody would have known about that.
	You have a comment from one parent, which I think says it all.
	This parent says, I am not a happy parent.
	My daughter is in her class.
	See the problem with that?
	It's a guy. This person is nuts, and you're using these nonsense pronouns.
	Stephen King is pushing for safeguards against shootings, but suggests that he doesn't want to outlaw all guns.
	Really. You look at the twisted mind of Stephen King.
	If anybody's going to have anything banned, you ought to ban his books.
	But I'm not into banning the First Amendment or the Second Amendment.
	But he comes out and he says, so, Montana bans TikTok, but AR-15s are still okay?
	Let's violate all the Bill of Rights.
	No, I'm not interested in violating any of the Bill of Rights.
	But, hey, if we're going to pick and choose, let's get rid of his books.
	What a dark mind this guy has got.
	Really dark. Deeply disturbing mind.
	As I said, we...
	We heard his, first thing I know was it, yeah, the date of the Kennedy assassination, November something, 20, 1960, was it 63?
	Yeah. Anyway, November something, 1963.
	They made a TV series out of it, which we didn't watch.
	But, you know, Karen and I listened to that on a trip, and he does a great job.
	He's a great writer, does a great description of what life was like in 1963.
	We enjoyed it because we remember that.
	Young kids at the time.
	And yet, you know, that's the typical lone shooter nonsense is what it was all based on with JFK. And that was annoying.
	But, you know, it was, this is a time travel thing.
	But it was the picture, not the plot.
	The picture of the people there and the time that was there that was interesting.
	And so we thought, well, we'll get another Stephen King book and got a couple of them for another trip that we took.
	And we'd listen to it a little bit and it's like, whoa, this is so dark, it's sick.
	Let's try a different book.
	And we went to like two or three of them and just said, okay, that's it, we're done with this guy.
	What many Americans want, he said, is reasonable safeguards against the homicidal and the mentally ill.
	Like I said, start with his books.
	I want to be protected from Americans being influenced by Stephen King's dark mind.
	Particularly those who delight in his darkness.
	Because there's a lot of people who do.
	And they read anything this guy puts out.
	But the Second Amendment folks...
	It's not something that gives us our rights.
	The Second Amendment is there to prohibit the government from interfering with our God-given rights, even on the edges.
	The Second Amendment is there to prohibit something like the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.
	That's why it's there.
	Their existence, their very existence, is a repudiation of the Second Amendment.
	Rockfin, Audi MRR, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, just wishing you and yours a blessed week.
	Well, thank you. I appreciate that very much.
	And, of course, MRR is Modern Retro Radio.
	I appreciate that. Thank you.
	Thank you to Modern Retro Radio.
	We're going to be right back.
	Music The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com The David Knight Show.
	welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about what is happening to our kids.
	Because, you know, as we look at what is happening with the transgender stuff, it's like, how in the world did we get here?
	How did this rabid LGBT stuff, once we get to the T's, all of a sudden, they're coming after the kids in a big way?
	In your face, unashamed, demanding access to your kids.
	How did we get to this point?
	Well, as I've said many times when we talk about bankruptcy, You know, that quote from Ernest Hemingway, where the, you know, multi-millionaire, billionaire we'd say today, is now bankrupt and the person says, you were so rich, how did that happen?
	He said, well, gradually then suddenly, that's the way moral bankruptcy happens to us.
	I remember hearing a pastor say, you know, when you see these pastors go down, it's not something just happened one day, you know.
	All of a sudden you see something about some guy, he's got a big mega church and everything, and he's accused of, you know, sexual affairs or, you know, adultery, let's just put that one, affair.
	Why do we use that word? He's accused of adultery and depravity and other things like that, or, you know, accused of coming after people, harassing them, things like that.
	That didn't just happen in one day.
	That was a gradual process.
	And then suddenly, you know, that happened.
	And then suddenly, it's revealed one day.
	And you see what this person's been doing all along.
	And that's what's been happening to our society and happening to us as individuals.
	This is a piece from LifeSite News.
	Actually, it's a video there.
	The pornography addiction crisis is fueling widespread sexual violence in schools.
	Yeah, it is. And it is in our society in general.
	Just take a look at this program coming out of the BBC. It's called Naked Education.
	They've received now nearly a thousand complaints to the government about this broadcast.
	It's a British TV show aiming to promote body positivity.
	And so it shows adult men stripping naked in front of children.
	This is, again, we begin with pornography and then we get to this point.
	Where you've got middle-aged men or whatever stripping naked in front of kids, and they use that as TV. You know, it was in the UK where they began Big Brother.
	And I have thought, and of course we had it copied in different countries, had it copied in the US as well.
	And I thought, and I've said for the longest time, I think the purpose of that was to normalize Big Brother.
	To normalize surveillance.
	To make it cool.
	If you look at the way this all rolled out, they started showing Big Brother before there was any social media.
	You know, that happened back in the 90s.
	And it got really big, and everybody is watching all this stuff.
	And the people who were picked to be contestants on the Big Brother show, you know, where you watch everything that they're doing in great detail.
	And... They become celebrities for essentially prostituting themselves.
	And then, lo and behold, as that show gets very big internationally, we now have a way for everybody to do that.
	It's called LifeLog.
	Oh, I mean, that's what the intelligence agency called it.
	Then they shut that down and they called it Facebook and social media.
	And so they normalize that kind of behavior for everybody.
	And now, as we've been going through this transgender stuff, which is directly targeting kids to fulfill the sexual fantasies of these adult men who do simulated strip teases and all the rest of this stuff, now we have a TV program that just goes straight there.
	This is, in the first episode, a teenager told the producers, I've never seen like a full naked man before.
	Another young girl.
	Said, it's just a lot to process.
	We've never really seen this naked men in real life after four adult men stood in front of the group of children and dropped their bathroids to bear everything.
	We used to lock people up for doing this, right?
	It used to be a crime.
	Now it's a TV show.
	That's how sick our society is.
	The host described the program as quote educational, emotional, joyous.
	Well, they revel in this, don't they?
	And they demand to have your kids as part of this as well.
	There was an interesting op-ed piece that was about the effects of pornography that I started talking about on Saturday.
	On Saturday, fortunately, I was able to do the guest host for Bradley Dean has Sons of Liberty on a Saturday afternoon.
	So I did the show on Saturday, did his show.
	He was doing research in D.C. for a TV documentary that he's going to do.
	But it's good to host for him because he's on GCN. And every time I do it, I get all these people saying, I didn't know that you were still around.
	You know, from what Alex said, you're gone.
	And he would like for them to thank that.
	So it's always good to get on GCN and to let people know that I'm still there.
	I started talking about this, but I ran out of time.
	And so anybody who happened to catch it on Saturday, you're going to hear a little bit more of this repeated.
	But I haven't said it on this show for this audience.
	And this is from faithwire.com, written by Trey Goines Phillips.
	And he was talking about Dennis Prager, who went on with Jordan Peterson, and they were talking about pornography.
	And Dennis Prager thinks that it's good.
	He thinks it's kind of a pressure-relief valve for men so that they don't commit adultery.
	So I guess that's how we wind up with people like Musk and Trump and Prager and all these people who are now setting our new moral standards, right?
	But this writer, Trey, says what he said was overly simplistic, undeniably problematic view of pornography.
	Prager said men want variety.
	He said pornography is not awful as long as it is used as a substitute for adultery.
	Well, there you go, right?
	It's easy for us to talk about the moral failings of the transgenders and the LGBT, isn't it?
	But this is an argument that I think hits home for everybody because it is ubiquitous.
	Everywhere you go, you're being hit on the internet.
	You're being hit with pictures of one sort of the other.
	It's to the point now where when I go to Daily Mail, I've got that website set up on reader-only mode.
	So I don't see the pictures.
	I want to go there and, you know, if there's an article there that they've covered, and sometimes they will get there first.
	Before other people do.
	But I don't want to see all the stuff on the site.
	It's porno bait.
	It's a porno bait site.
	Clickbait, it's porno bait.
	But yeah, it hits home for everybody.
	It hits home for Christian heterosexuals, right?
	What was Jesus' standard?
	Well, he points out in this thing, he says, anybody who even looks at a woman with lust has committed adultery with her in his heart.
	See, it's not enough for us to comply with the outward commandments.
	That's what Jesus was pointing out.
	You got the Ten Commandments, which lay out some broad moral standards that are horizontal, you know, between people.
	And don't kill, don't steal, don't commit adultery, things like that.
	But also, we forget about the ones that are...
	Vertical, the ones that are between us and God.
	But in every one of those areas, Jesus says, well, you know, God sees your heart.
	It's not enough just to have an outward compliance with that.
	That's why I said, you know, when you had these Ten Commandments put in the Texas school, one Texas state legislator wants to put them in the schools.
	That's fine. But the purpose of the Ten Commandments...
	Is that of a schoolteacher shows you that you can't comply with this.
	And yet you have people like Dennis Prager who think, well, I can comply with it.
	If I don't actually commit adultery, I'm fine.
	No, Jesus said, if you're doing it in your heart, if you're angry with somebody, you are committing murder in your heart.
	That's what you really want to do.
	You're just being constrained because you're afraid of what people will do to you if you commit adultery, if you commit murder, that type of thing.
	But God's looking at your heart.
	So he sets up an impossible standard for us.
	And then he paid the price for our failings.
	And gives us a chance to start over if we follow him, if we trust in him.
	And that's the point.
	Jesus' point was to show that none of us can do this perfectly.
	And yet Prager, practicing Jew, told Peterson, his fellow panelists, that looking at a woman lustfully is not a sin in Judaism.
	He said anyone, Jesus said anyone who does that has committed adultery in his heart.
	But Prager says if adultery is a substitute for one's wife, it's awful.
	But if it's a substitute for adultery, it's not awful.
	That's how he did the equation here.
	Well, what you've done is you've adulterated your relationship.
	That's what adultery means.
	That's what adult entertainment means.
	It means adulterated.
	It doesn't mean mature.
	It doesn't mean you're an adult.
	It means you have adulterated something, like you've added something that is tainted to something that was pure.
	And so... Trey says, presumably if a man is watching pornography because without it he would be committing adultery, then he is by default using it as a substitute for his wife.
	Prager's shallow defense of pornography also says nothing of the damage that its consumption causes because it breeds self-esteem issues, jealousy, distrust, unrealistic expectations for both partners.
	It often leads consumers to fantasize.
	To fantasize and even act out in ways that objectify and harm their partners, much like an addictive drug.
	And I think it's interesting because Jordan Peterson, I played that clip for you last week, where he was on a, you know, two people being interviewed, and he was one of the people being interviewed, and he was, the question to both of them was, you know, do we need God? And he said, well, according to my Jungian psychiatry, Anything that you put at the top, you've got a hierarchy of things in your life that are important to you.
	Whatever you put at the top, that is God to you, said Peterson.
	And he's absolutely right about that.
	So if we put pleasure from drugs at the top, if we put pornography or sex or whatever, if we put alcohol, gambling, anything, it could be something that isn't inherently bad.
	Money is not inherently bad, but if you love money, if that becomes the thing, the pinnacle of your life that is in the hierarchy, as the psychiatrists would say, of your life, then that is God to you.
	The human heart is an idol factory.
	We're always looking to make God out of something, the thing, the one thing, right?
	Kind of like city slickers, you know?
	One thing. And we will serve that one thing.
	So what are you going to serve? While we are, of course, called to honor our spouses and always consider the value of others, says Trey.
	Prager's argument for pornography wrongly suggests our ultimate allegiance is to one another.
	Based on some artificial moral code, rather than to a holy God whose standards are established in Scripture.
	And that's the vertical aspect of it.
	Again, you can say, wow, I've got this way that I can be externally as far as people see.
	I'm perfectly fine.
	I have this dark thing that is the God of my life.
	And that's why Jesus made that standard.
	So, you know, we're told in the last days men will become lovers of self.
	I guess this is quite literally true now.
	Grave problem revealed by the law, remedied only by Jesus who took on all of our sins so human beings could be made righteous in God's eyes.
	Just as a priest has to purify himself before he can make sacrifices in Judaism, so too we have to purify ourselves before we can make sacrifices to God that are acceptable to him.
	So, the human heart is the most deceitful of all things, desperately wicked.
	Who can know how evil it is?
	That's from the Old Testament, Jeremiah.
	Finally, he finishes, Trey does, Trey Goins Phillips.
	He says, Prager's weak rationalization for pornography is deeply concerning, but my hope is for the Christian it'll serve as a profound reminder.
	The source of our morality, the Word of God, is of the utmost importance.
	And in a relativistic world that is run amok, where everybody does what is right in their own sight, no standards, no absolute truth of anything, why is it that we have so much obsession?
	About misinformation, disinformation, malinformation.
	These people who say, I will tell you what is true.
	At the same time, they say, what is truth?
	There is no truth. Nothing is true except what they say.
	Well, isn't that obvious what this is all about?
	You know, there is, you obey me.
	I am like God to you.
	But of course, nothing else.
	Even your own biology.
	You can't count on that.
	That's not true. Everything is morally relativistic.
	Everything is postmodern, except what they say to us.
	We must obey that without any questions.
	Yes, they do see themselves as God.
	In a relativistic world, run amok...
	It is the shield, the Word of God, that protects our holiness from our feelings, from our feelings.
	And I just got to say, you know, when you get into a situation like this, how are you going to conquer this?
	How are you going to conquer your pornography addiction or your alcohol addiction or your drug addiction or your gambling addiction or whatever it is that enslaves you, your addiction to money, your desire to be powerful or your desire to be liked?
	What is it? How is it that you're going to conquer that very powerful thing?
	Well, you have to not just try to turn from it in your own strength.
	You have to renounce it, and you have to ask God in prayer for the strength to get rid of it.
	But you have to renounce it, that thing that is controlling your thoughts and your minds, whatever that is.
	And if you do that, that does work.
	God's curse is on a country, this country, that would be led by wicked men, and a country that would beg for wicked men to rule over us.
	And we'll talk about what that looks like when we return.
	Stay with us. Joe, we've got a problem.
	What, uh, who are you?
	It's the new mug they're selling at thedavidknightshow.com, right?
	So, basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right?
	Because, basically, you can't hold coffee with your hands, right?
	I'm what it's got today, but anyone tries to mug me, I'm being ready for it, you dog-faced pony soldier.
	They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee, then save the world.
	This could be bad for us.
	Save the world? But we owe the world.
	These people, they're supporting free speech with every month they buy.
	Come on. These people, I tell you, well, anyway.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, that's what funds our program.
	You know what funds the Trump program?
	It's people like Anheuser-Busch.
	And so because of that, You've got baby Trump, Donald Trump Jr., telling people, lay off of Anheuser-Busch.
	That's lost $6 billion in six days in terms of their stock.
	That, you know, nobody wants to be associated with it.
	Nobody wants to drink it or buy it.
	So he says, lay off.
	They give a lot of money to us.
	You say, that's it.
	Just like, you know, lay off the Republicans, lay off of Pfizer and Moderna.
	They give a lot of money to us, you know.
	They give a lot of money to Fox News.
	That's why people like Tucker Carlson laid off of them.
	You know, that's the thing that bothered me.
	All through 2020, 2021, Tucker Carlson, you know, he knew what it was.
	And he would roll his eyes or whatever.
	But he wouldn't come out and say it.
	It bothered me to see people say, well, you know, they'd be on YouTube.
	Well, let's talk about this mandate.
	We know it's coming.
	They're saying that they're going to mandate that we get the vaccine and we're not going to be able to go anywhere and do anything.
	But they wouldn't say vaccine.
	They'd say, they said that you're going to get the thing.
	Let's call it the thing.
	I have to call it the thing on YouTube.
	Because if I don't call it the thing on YouTube, they're going to shut me down.
	So I've got to play by their rules.
	It's like, I'm sorry, I don't play that game.
	So I guess I sit here in my garage doing this because I'm not going to play that game.
	I will not self-censor myself for YouTube, for Elon Musk, for Alex Jones, for anybody.
	When it's wrong, it's wrong.
	And so, you know, for Anheuser-Busch, you should shut up because they give us money.
	You should shut up about Pfizer because, you know, hey, you're...
	This is, you know, brought to you by Pfizer.
	CBS Health Watch, sponsored by Pfizer.
	Anderson Cooper 360.
	It's brought to you by Pfizer.
	And so they would send, the guy's name was Dr.
	Mark Siegel or something. I remember when that happened, it was like July of 2020.
	And they send Mark Siegel down to Washington to interview Trump.
	And they're standing six feet apart from each other so they don't have to wear masks, you know.
	They can kind of follow the rules and all the rest of the stuff.
	And so they're having this, you know, interview at a distance, the magic six-foot number that just was made up.
	And Mark Siegel is saying, so you're doing really good with it.
	Oh, yes, we're doing great.
	We're going to have that out there in no time.
	You know, we skipped all the testing, all that stuff.
	He goes, so are you going to take it?
	Are you going to be the first one to take it?
	Well, if I do, they're going to say that I'm jumping ahead of line.
	If I take it and wait and have other people take it, they're going to say I'm afraid of it.
	So I don't know what to do. It's all this stuff.
	They required Tucker Carlson to throw to that piece.
	It was pre-recorded. They could have aired it in any of the shows.
	But they required that Tucker Carlson throw to that.
	And I talked about it when I was still at Infowars.
	I said, look at this. You know, he says, well, here we are.
	And you could tell his body language is, you know, here it is.
	And he throws to it.
	And then when he comes back, he's going to go, okay, well, you know, we're back.
	And he was disgusted to do it.
	He would make comments occasionally like, well, I'm not getting it eventually, right?
	He got a little bit more bold and he said, well, I'm not getting it.
	But he wouldn't tell people not to get it.
	He wouldn't tell people it was poison.
	He wouldn't tell people what had happened with the vaccines.
	I got a big problem with that.
	Anyway, Anheuser-Busch loses a lot of money.
	So, by the way, this Dylan Mulvaney guy, he's still a guy in every regard.
	As far as I could tell, he's had some surgery, but it was facial, not genital.
	And first time I ever saw this was the clip of Drew Barrymore.
	And a cringe worship of this guy.
	That's literally what she was doing.
	She was worshiping him.
	Just amazing. You are worthy.
	You are worthy. On her knees and tears and all the rest of this stuff.
	You are worthy of praise.
	You offer us real freedom.
	It offers you slavery.
	And so... With all this happening, we now have Donald Trump Jr.
	come out and sit on his rumble show.
	He said, just lay off of them, right?
	Because it's about the money. It's about the money given to me.
	Don't talk about it.
	He accused conservatives of the tendency of shooting first and aiming second.
	And as I've said, you look at the Trump clan at Mar-a-Lago, even in the run-up to the 2020 election.
	We had Melania talking about all the things that they had done for the LGBT people.
	How they had had some firsts for the LGBT people.
	How they had supported same-sex mirage and all the rest of this stuff.
	And, you know, this is the guy that all the evangelical Christians were lining up to follow, right?
	A lot of the leaders, I should say.
	The guy who did this with Epstein.
	Stop! An invitation into Donald Trump's world.
	Footage from 1992 found in the NBC archives shows the future president welcoming Jeffrey Epstein to his Mar-a-Lago estate.
	The get-together more than a decade before Epstein pleaded guilty to prostitution charges in Florida.
	Both men are seen enjoying themselves.
	Trump pointing out women dancing in front of them.
	An apparently friendly encounter with a man the president is now looking to distance himself from.
	Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him.
	I had a falling out with him a long time ago.
	I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years.
	I wasn't a fan. Yeah, wasn't a fan.
	Wasn't a fan. Well, I'm not a fan either of the orange man.
	Study says the New American study shows that people are prejudiced against men and not against women.
	They're prejudiced against straight people and not against transgenders.
	They're prejudiced against white people more than they're prejudiced against black people.
	And we could go on and on, but let's just keep it with this particular study here.
	Again, people are prejudiced against men and not women, and this is where all this stuff started, with the Equal Rights Amendment and all the rest of this stuff.
	And look, men and women are not the same.
	And there is a created order.
	God never made anything with two heads.
	There's no normal thing that has two heads.
	If it's got two heads, it's going to die in nature.
	And that includes institutions.
	You can't have two heads in an institution.
	Somebody's got to ultimately make the decision.
	And that includes the family.
	But there are complementary roles.
	And before Christ, we're equal as human beings.
	But in terms of institutions, you've got to have a head somewhere.
	And there is a head of the family that has been established in God's created order.
	He made the decision for us.
	A lot of men don't want that role.
	A lot of women want that role.
	And sometimes the two of them can't decide and they wind up getting divorced.
	Because if you've got something that's like a Siamese twin, you're going to have to get a separation.
	If you've got two heads, it isn't going to survive.
	For decades, a politically correct line has been that society is implicitly biased against women, non-whites, and an assortment of other minority groups.
	This alleged bias is said to lead to poor social health, educational, and career outcomes.
	Even though in certain cases, minority groups may fare better than majority populations in these respects.
	What's more, a billion-dollar implicit bias training issue.
	Has blossomed in a purported effort to eliminate these attitudes.
	The whole thing about implicit bias is to begin to judge people based on immutable characteristics.
	You're male, so you're bad.
	You're female, so you're good. You're white, so you're bad.
	You're black, or people of color, so you're good.
	That type of thing. And they justify that with this implicit bias label.
	In fact, the most significant bias researchers found was in favor of women against men.
	The study involved almost 6,000 individuals, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, also discovered a notable but less significant bias relating to social class.
	Contrary to popular pseudo-elite narratives, however, race wasn't much of a factor at all, and age was totally irrelevant.
	Well, the researchers did not say.
	Is that this impression results from decades of feminist framing in which men's faults are magnified, their triumphs are wholly ignored, and focusing only on cons to prove exclusion can make anyone or anything look bad.
	And, of course, they use this same tactic the Marxists do to tear down any and everything.
	We're going to tear down the statues of this person because we're going to ignore everything that they did good, which is why we put that statue up there.
	And we're going to focus on the things that were bad about them, even if those things may not necessarily be true, even if it's perhaps only guilt by association, being associated with a society that was involved in slave trade, for example.
	Yes, men have committed most of the crime, the violence, and the atrocities, and yet they have also birthed virtually all of the science, the technology, medicine.
	They have saved literally billions of lives through history, have begotten unprecedented prosperity.
	And additionally, they perform almost all the most dangerous dirty jobs, which is why 92% of workplace deaths involve men.
	They constitute virtually all of the emergency personnel who risk life and limb rushing into disaster zones.
	Due to earthquakes, hurricanes, forest fires, tornadoes, floods, etc., in order to save others. But this is not about that.
	This is not about a rational, you know, even-handed evaluation of the contributions of different types of people in different ways.
	It's not about that at all.
	This is about overthrowing society.
	And this is the tactic that they use in every aspect of society.
	I never played the video because it's very visual.
	But they...
	There was a visual, and they had a bunch of kids come out and stand like six feet apart or whatever, you know, and they were people of color, and then they asked them if they were proud or ashamed of, you know, raise your hand to indicate.
	And then they did the same, and they all were.
	Then they did the same thing with white kids.
	And they were all like skulking and afraid to raise their hands.
	What is it with a system that is weaponized against people on the basis of their skin color, on the basis of their sex, their gender?
	Well, we know exactly what this is about.
	And as I've said many times, it is to destroy one system, to replace it with another.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk a little bit about the leak as time goes on.
	I'm starting to see some of the people say the same things or my first impression about what this is truly about.
	Remember when this was about to break, even before this guy was identified and arrested, we had the Washington Post and we had the New York Times leading the investigation.
	Were they doing the investigation for the FBI or were they being fed the information by the FBI? And the DOJ or whatever.
	Big U.S. intelligence leak was by a gun enthusiast in his 20s, said the Washington Post.
	You see? That's the problem. The problem is not the Pentagon.
	The problem is not their security measures.
	The problem is not the national security state that classifies and overclassifies everything to the extent they don't have enough people to handle the stuff properly.
	They can't vet the people properly.
	They got too many people they got to vet because there's too many secrets and everything is top secret.
	No, that's not the problem.
	The problem isn't the rest of the...
	The problem is this gun owner, this gun enthusiast.
	And that's the way the Washington Post put it.
	A gun enthusiast in his 20s.
	And of course, the Washington Post identified these people who were in a gaming group So they're brought together by their mutual love of guns, gear, and God.
	Military gear. They weren't brought together by games?
	I thought that's what the group was initially about.
	They found other things that they had in common, things that the Washington Post does not like.
	Guns, military gear, and God.
	These people are Christians?
	Are you kidding me? Obviously this is the issue, right?
	The issue is not the Pentagon.
	The issue is not the war.
	The issue is not the lies that people are being told about a war.
	How we have changed, isn't it, from the original Pentagon Papers where the New York Times and the Washington Post portrayed themselves as virtuous for exposing lies about Vietnam.
	Now they're doing everything they can to cover up the lies about Ukraine and then using this to come after a demographic.
	Maybe they're going to make this guy the new poster child for another wave of Of persecution against conservatives like they did with January the 6th.
	Who knows? Kash Patel is questioning the narrative.
	This is an interview that he did with Breitbart.
	He said, quote, this is an extensive cover-up.
	Kash Patel is the former Chief of Staff at the Pentagon, the former Deputy Director of National Intelligence.
	And in this Breitbart interview, he's also a former federal prosecutor.
	So he's got a lot of background.
	He's been at the Pentagon. He's been national intelligence.
	He's been a prosecutor with all this stuff.
	And he thinks this thing smells like a rat.
	He says he doesn't believe, quote, for a single second that this guy, a 21-year-old Air National Guardsman, ran this operation alone, unquote.
	Wow. He said even though he worked in information technology, he still would not have had access to this information.
	Why is that?
	He had top-secret clearance.
	Don't people who have top-secret clearance, don't they get to see everything that the government has?
	Well, no. It's highly compartmentalized, isn't it?
	Right? He says you can be the biggest IT person in the DOD, Department of Defense, And you can still be compartmented off of the actual information.
	Almost never does an IT person need to know, as we say, the substance of the intelligence.
	Their job is to provide the secure information systems around it in order to protect any disclosures.
	Well, okay, but if he's got access to the system, can't he get into some of this information?
	Well, here's what he has to say about that.
	He says, this is crazy sensitive stuff.
	99% of the people who have a top secret clearance don't have access to this information.
	He says, me, as the former deputy DNI, Director of National Intelligence, And chief of staff of the DOD and publisher of the presidential daily brief with the highest security classification.
	I know that literally there are not a lot of people in the U.S. that have access to this kind of intelligence.
	And it's done for a reason.
	It's done so that this doesn't happen.
	He said, while the Joint Chief of Staff's daily brief produced by its Directorate of Intelligence goes out to thousands of people, there is still underlying contributing information that is compartmented and goes to fewer people.
	The underlying intel, that is very sensitive, he said, because it exposes how we got it, who we got it from, when we got it, whether we can get it again, and how that is delivered.
	And what he is saying is this information, and that's a quote from him, what he's saying here essentially is that, you know, there's a lot of different levels of compartmentalization.
	And this would be the most compartmented information because what we have seen leaked exposes how we got it, where we got it from, who we got it from, when we got it, can we get it again, and so forth.
	How it was delivered, all of that stuff is being exposed in these things.
	So he says, so that goes to the highest levels.
	Only a few people get to see that.
	That's why, you know, when we looked at the email leaks from Hillary Clinton, they were no big deal, right?
	They just looked the other way.
	I guess it's because she wasn't a gun owner, a Christian, I guess.
	Or a man, right?
	At least she doesn't own up to that.
	But anyway, you know, just give her a pass.
	Not a problem. But the stuff that was there, she said, oh, look, you know, there were a few of these things.
	Okay, so I had some top secret documents.
	So what? There's a lot of things that were there that were not classified.
	Well, because, and those things were perhaps even more important because they were about discussions with other foreign heads of state.
	And those things are born above top secret.
	And so anyway, it says, so that's one thing, Kash Patel said.
	Second thing, Kash Patel said, was the way the classified information was put out suggests that Teixeira did not act alone.
	Whether he's in IT or not is irrelevant.
	The way it was produced.
	The way it was put out there.
	Pages. And printed photographs taken and published online.
	That is a methodical way of releasing classified information illegally, he said.
	And I think he's definitely working with other people in the DOD or the intel space to get this information out.
	This is an Assange-style operation, he says.
	This kid, no offense to him, is 21 years old, cannot put out this five months' unlawful disclosure of sensitive intelligence.
	Now, I'm not really sure what he means by the Assange-style operation.
	Does that mean that, you know, Assange was, you know, and I'm sure that what it is, because we had the Trump administration, was trying to make the case that Julian Assange was participating in all of this and not just reporting it.
	So, but again, I don't see how that, by a stretch of the imagination, Applies to this situation.
	I think this kid was naive.
	I think that he, they probably knew that they could use him.
	They probably knew that if they dropped this information to him, you know, I'm sure these people were monitoring what he was doing.
	And they made this stuff available to him, knowing that he would put it out there.
	They doctored the documents so that some of it would be true and people would believe some of the stuff that was true.
	Then they would add their false stuff, which would be the The lies that they wanted people to believe about that.
	That's why I say, you know, we look at any of the stuff that's there.
	Who knows whether any of that stuff is true or not.
	And I believe that he was used as a patsy to put this stuff out.
	I don't think this is anything at all like Julian Assange.
	I think Julian Assange was publishing information that was given to him.
	I think he should have had the same protections that were given to Daniel Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers.
	But again, they come after him by saying, well, he participated in getting this stuff, and, you know, so he is actually the person who stole it.
	No, he's not. And I think it's really damning that the Trump administration, and it was Dana Rohrabacher who said it, a congressman in California, said, we offered Julian Assange a pardon.
	If he would tell everybody who it was that released all the Russiagate stuff.
	So you do something for me, right?
	You make me look good and I won't come after you and try to kill you for journalism, free speech.
	That's the Trump administration's approach.
	How pathetic. Anyway, Kash Patel said, I think the DOD and the intelligence community gave it to the New York Times and the Washington Post.
	I agree. They're giving it to them to say, we need a cover-up.
	We need to make sure people think Ukraine is working.
	We need to make it seem like it's one rogue 21-year-old actor in some airbase in Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
	The amount of intelligence they got, said Kash Patel.
	Somebody's giving them that type of documentation.
	It is just not readily available.
	And that's what I've thought from the very beginning.
	That's why I believe that it was a setup.
	This guy was a patsy. He's 21 years old.
	He's naive. And it's like, oh, look.
	Whoa. Somebody left these documents laying around.
	Well, and he starts reading them.
	And then he tells his buddies, you know, look, you guys need to understand what's really happening.
	And, you know, so here's the background information.
	I've got the receipts. This is what's really happening.
	And then somebody puts it out in an argument with someone on another site.
	I think they knew that was all going to go down that way.
	And I think when you look at the quantity of the information, and as Kash Patel is saying, the fact that this is highly compartmented information, That means that people at a very high level wanted that information out and used this guy.
	And now they're going to make him and anybody that is like him.
	Anybody that likes guns and God.
	Well, you're like this guy.
	We can't trust you.
	We've got to kick you out of the military.
	Just like we kicked out all those people who said, I'm not going to take a vaccine that is tainted by abortion.
	Or maybe a process to normalize the mark of the beast or whatever other religious objections they might.
	Get those people out. We don't want anybody with a conscience in here.
	The New York Times and the Washington Post says Kash Patel, the fact that they broke this story...
	It also leads me to believe that it's the same tradecraft from Russiagate, that when deep state actors want stuff out there, they put it out to their sources.
	Am I to believe that these two newspapers found this guy out first before the FBI? That's what they're telling us, right?
	That's absurd, he said.
	Yeah, they were given that information, as I pointed out, on Friday when I showed you the clip.
	You know, you got, I think it was an ABC helicopter flying overhead.
	You know, a long time before anybody actually engaged this guy.
	It rolled out in slow motion.
	But of course, you know, they'd already named this guy a day or so, at least a day, before the FBI moved on him.
	He said, this is an extensive cover-up.
	It's going to be going on for some time.
	He said the kid should be prosecuted.
	He broke the law. He needs to be prosecuted.
	But he says this is a CYA operation.
	It's a CIA operation as well.
	CIA, CYA. He said intelligence shows that the Pentagon and the President Biden have been lying to the American people about how well the Ukraine war was doing.
	He said I think the substance of the intel says basically our effort in Ukraine, our $100 billion effort, is failing.
	He says, why hasn't the Armed Services Committee subpoenaed Mark Milley or Lloyd Austin?
	Why haven't they demanded an answer under oath as to why they have been lying to the President of the United States or permitted him to lie on the success and the failure of our operations in Ukraine?
	Well, you know, we've had a situation like that where we had James Clapper brought before a Senate committee and asked, are you spying on the American people?
	Oh, no, Senator, not intentionally.
	You know, lied to everybody under oath.
	Nobody ever even suggested that he ought to be charged with perjury.
	None of the Republicans.
	None of the people who were at the target of his Russiagate that he was so involved in.
	You know, Clapper and Brennan, all these people, no, they didn't care about it.
	They're just going to let it go.
	Why wasn't this intelligence briefed to these members in Congress who were supposed to oversee our highest levels of intelligence?
	And if they were told it, it's an even bigger problem because it clearly shows the U.S. position in the Ukraine is failing.
	Now, the Russians are not believing that.
	It's kind of interesting to see the back and forth.
	Yeah, I mean, the Russians have said, well, you know, they understated how well we're doing.
	We're doing much better than that. Looks bad for the Ukrainians, but we're doing much better than that.
	Meanwhile, you know, they are trying to make us think that they can't mount an offensive because they don't have enough stuff.
	But we think that they do, you know.
	So it's this back and forth, like I said, the fog of war.
	You know, this is truth mixed with lies, and there's no way that we're going to sort this thing out.
	The leaker drips all over the U.S.'s plans for a perpetual proxy war against Russia.
	This is from antiwar.com.
	The Biden administration promised negotiations when Ukraine takes back lost territory.
	They said, well, that sounds good, doesn't it?
	Problem is, the Defense Intelligence Agency's assessment...
	That was just leaked by Taksira.
	Revealed it's unlikely that Ukraine can take back the lost territory.
	Worst of all, prolonged stalemate may encourage Zelensky to seek long-range missiles to bomb deep into Russia.
	And that's a prescription for a nuclear confrontation that the U.S. doesn't like, revealed in leaked secret assessments.
	And so, you know, it made news last week when Trump went on with Tucker...
	I said, you know, forget about global warming.
	You need to be worried about nuclear warming.
	Well, yeah.
	But, again, what is it about just the war in general?
	You know, it's not just the massive amounts of fuel.
	That are consumed by moving these resources, you know, planes, ships, tanks, all this other kind of stuff around.
	It's not just the carbon footprint of missiles being launched, but it's also the bombs going off.
	What is the carbon footprint of all that stuff?
	Should we care about any of that stuff?
	Well, Lindsey Graham is very angry that Tucker Carlson and MTG... Are saying that it was good that we found out that we're being lied to by the U.S. government?
	And again, that's the question.
	Are we being lied to? Are they trying to present a position that is not true to the Russians, hoping that the Russians will believe it?
	We can never know. And the worst part about all this stuff, of course, you're always going to have a fog of war, and they're always going to play those types of games in a war.
	But we ought to have a discussion about what winning looks like.
	Why are we in this war?
	What are we trying to achieve?
	And how will we know when we have achieved it?
	That's the kind of discussion you're supposed to have.
	And this thing has been going on now for over a year.
	And we haven't had that discussion.
	And we will never have that discussion because we never have that discussion about any of these military operations since World War II. So, anyway, perpetual war.
	Graham says, what they're suggesting will destroy America's ability to defend itself.
	What they're suggesting is that we have some information, some transparency, that there be a debate as to whether or not we should be doing this.
	That would destroy their military empire.
	Meanwhile, the mercenary group, the Wagner group, I guess we call it, instead of Wagner, I guess we go to the American pronunciation, The Wagner Group, let's call it, said that the leaked Pentagon documents contained no strategic revelations that could harm Kiev, and the media attention they received looks like an attempt by the West to buy time for the Ukrainian military's much-anticipated spring offensive.
	The documents by themselves do not pose any strategic danger, says the Wagnerian.
	It has not got her down wrong yet.
	It is clear that the military operations on Ukraine's side are tactically directed by Ukrainian soldiers, but strategically by the so-called Western coalition run by the U.S. and by the U.K., said the Wagnerian.
	US intel leaks show that Russia's special forces have been decimated in this Ukrainian report.
	They also show that we've had special forces there, I guess, in order to get them decimated equally.
	The people who got the most are the UK. They've got 50 soldiers out of about 99 that were identified in these documents as being there.
	And, of course, they deny that.
	We don't deny that our 17 special forces are there.
	Thousands of anti-government protesters rally in Prague.
	They're rallying against the soaring inflation.
	Where did that come from? Well, it got kicked off with a war.
	And so these two things are not separate issues.
	They are one and the same.
	The soaring inflation, the Biden-NATO-mandated poverty and austerity, the green agenda, the green McMuffin, All of this stuff, along with the war, it's all one and the same thing.
	It was a second rally at Prague's Wenceslas Square.
	A new political party has arisen.
	It is known as the Against the Poverty Party.
	We should have one of those here in the United States.
	I'd join a party that was against the poverty, against the planned austerity, against the planned slavery.
	So again, soaring inflation because of these sanctions by Biden, and he's not going to let up on any of this stuff.
	We want the government's resignation, they said.
	Resign, resign, said the protesters as they chanted.
	We are here to stand by our country.
	And so some of them were also signing their passing around a petition demanding that the country quit NATO. You know, Trump played with that.
	He knew that there was no purpose for NATO. Unless we wanted to go to war with Russia.
	And, you know, there really wasn't an issue with Russia until we picked a fight with him over this stuff.
	But unless we wanted to go to war with Russia, NATO didn't have a mission.
	And that's what everybody was saying.
	NATO doesn't really have a mission.
	But let's continue it anyway. The only thing that Trump was really concerned about, as he said, not so much that we're going to get rid of NATO, but I want other people to pay their fair share.
	Let's put more money into it, right?
	He wasn't saying, well, we want to cut our stuff back and these other people need to pick up this legacy.
	Let's all just chip in. Let's make it even bigger.
	Well, I think the appropriate response is to shut it down.
	To get out of it. These people understand exactly what is going on.
	This is not only a war in Ukraine, but it is a war against us.
	It is a war to force us into poverty, austerity, to make sure that we have nothing, that these people have everything.
	And they're doing it right there in Wenceslas Square, Good King Wenceslas.
	So I think he would be proud of this.
	And I'm going to play the Christmas break.
	I'm a good king.
	Winslet, we'll be right back. Winslet,
	we'll be we'll be right back.
	Winslet, we'll be right we'll be right back.
	Let's talk a little bit about politics.
	We had Newt Gingrich go on the Sunday shows.
	Actually, he's on Friday. He said, we don't want to be the anti-Biden party.
	We want to be the pro-America party.
	Well, the MAGA people would say, well, that's what we are.
	No, actually, you are, the MAGA party is not, the MAGA party is against everything and everyone except Donald Trump.
	And that's exactly what he's talking about.
	It's okay to criticize what's wrong.
	But Trump doesn't like to talk about the issues, does he?
	You have to have a vision.
	You have to not just say, you know, this is a problem.
	You have to actually identify what you're going to do about the problem.
	And if you've been president, you need to actually have done something about the problems that you identified.
	But this is so typical of where we are.
	Again, the vindictive attacks coming out of Trump and against, this is MAGA PAC. Running an ad against DeSantis.
	Not because of any policy issues.
	There's plenty of things you could say about DeSantis.
	Plenty of things that I've said about him.
	I don't think he's gone far enough to protect kids in Florida schools from this transgender attack, the grooming.
	We're only going to do, you know, grades one through three or K through three.
	We're not going to do pre-K. We're not even going to go to fourth grade.
	Different things like that.
	Or the vaccines.
	We're not going to recommend them for young kids.
	We won't stop the poison from being given to young kids.
	And we'll still recommend it for older people.
	And that type of thing. There's a lot of things that you could criticize DeSantis for.
	There's some good things that he's done as well.
	But they don't talk about any of this stuff.
	They don't want to bait the issues.
	They want to throw labels at people, and they want to criticize them like this.
	Ron DeSantis loves sticking his fingers where they don't belong.
	And we're not just talking about pudding.
	DeSantis has his dirty fingers all over senior entitlements.
	Like cutting Medicare, slashing Social Security, even raising our retirement age.
	Tell Ron DeSantis to keep his pudding fingers off our money.
	Wow. Does Trump really want to go there?
	He's taking his dirty fingers in places.
	I mean, this is the guy that hung out with Jeffrey Epstein.
	The MAGA people really think this works out to their advantage?
	Some truly damning material has turned up on DeSantis, writes the Washingtonian.
	It once was allegedly said that he once ate chocolate pudding with his hand.
	Two sources told the Daily Beast, because the Daily Beast is always on these really important issues as well.
	They told the Daily Beast DeSantis ate his dessert by scooping it up with three fingers.
	During a 2019 private plane flight.
	See? This is why politics is such a dirty business.
	Somebody claims they saw you eating pudding with three fingers four years ago.
	That's a statute of limitations on eating pudding with your fingers, even if it was true.
	He would sit in meetings and he would eat in front of people.
	Wow. So the Washingtonian says, yeah, there's other politicians that have been accused of weird and gross eating habits.
	Pelosi eating hot dogs every day, according to some people.
	And of course, you know, Joe Biden has been mocked for eating ice cream as well.
	This is the state of politics in our country.
	This is why we're ruled by tyrants, because we can be distracted like children.
	We can't focus on what is important.
	John Kasich. Remember when John Kasich in the 2016 thing?
	Of course, Trump was a big part of that.
	His people, a big part of that.
	Accused him of eating New York pizza with a fork and a knife.
	Wow. He says, in his defense, he said, well, it was scalding hot.
	Yes, I cut it up. You know, pulled it apart.
	Let it cool off. Trump was mocked for having a ketchup habit.
	Mark Warner, microwaved tuna.
	I guess, is that unusual?
	And then Amy Klobuchar ate salad with a comb, according to some people.
	This is why we can't have real elections, because our elections are done even before the voting starts.
	Because they treat us like children.
	They know that the vast majority of the voting public are like children.
	They can't remember what it was, like I pointed out at the beginning of the program today.
	You know, Trump got us out of Afghanistan.
	He took every screw, right?
	No, he didn't take a single screw out.
	I told him, you get every screw out of there and you do this and that.
	And I told a five-year-old kid, how would you get out of there, a five-year-old kid?
	And of course, the five-year-old kid doesn't remember that for five years, you know, Trump didn't get out of there for four years.
	Five-year-old kid is only old enough to, he was born yesterday.
	Over 32,000 babies' lives, let's talk about politics and abortion.
	Over 32,000 babies' lives have been saved after Roe v.
	Wade was overturned.
	Of course, you could put a subtitle on this as well.
	The subtitle that I was talking about for years, It was the fact that 62 million died because not one state for 50 years, not one state stood up to the Supreme Court and said, you don't have the authority to define when life begins or to do anything about that.
	And that was what Roe v.
	Wade was about. We're good to go.
	That Biden did, purporting to legally, to legislation to make same-sex mirage the legal standard.
	He doesn't have any authority to do that.
	The Supreme Court doesn't have the authority.
	He doesn't have the authority to do that.
	There's nothing in the Constitution that gives them that authority, and if the Constitution doesn't give them that authority, the Tenth Amendment says you don't have it if it's not specifically mentioned.
	You don't have the authority to tell us which foods and drugs we can have.
	You don't have the authority to define marriage.
	You don't have the authority to define when life begins.
	None of that stuff. And so for years I was saying, when is somebody at the state level going to have the backbone to stand up to these people and defend innocent life?
	Instead of clutching our pearls on the sideline and hoping that we're going to have the right constellation of Supreme Court judges to stop this.
	And eventually we did.
	And what they said was, This isn't for the federal government to decide.
	They said in the Dobbs decision, they said the same thing that I had been saying all along.
	This decision belongs to the states, and that's where the battle needs to be.
	And everybody is upset about that, Lindsey Graham especially, because why?
	Because why is Lindsey upset about that?
	Because this is an issue, a wedge issue, that was taken away from them at the federal level.
	It's still an issue at the state level.
	Still a big issue at the state level.
	But it was taken away from them at the federal level.
	The other person was very upset about this, if you remember.
	Now that we're in the election season, If Trump wants to talk about his opponents eating pudding with their fingers, I'm going to talk about how Trump pointed the finger at pro-life people and blamed them for the people that he picked who lost.
	To turn over the Senate to the Democrats.
	To destroy the big red wave.
	Oh, Trump said it's these extreme pro-lifers out there that are the problem.
	No, Trump, it was you.
	It was you. And you want to talk about putting?
	Well, the proof is in the pudding.
	The proof is in when you look at what Trump and his sons, oh, look, you know, let's give Busch Gardens, or not Busch Gardens, I think of it as Busch Gardens.
	I worked at Busch Gardens for a summer in a band.
	But, you know, Anheuser-Busch, they give more money to us than they give to the liberals.
	So lay off of them.
	This is all about who gives us the money.
	Come on. It was the abortion issue, he said, back in January this year.
	Poorly handled by many Republicans, especially those that firmly insisted on no exceptions.
	See, he's the most pro-life president out there, except when he's not.
	He's all about himself.
	And he gets very angry with people if people point out that it was the awful candidates that he brought up to the front and made sure they won the Republican primary.
	Of course, it's very easy for anybody to win a Republican primary if Donald Trump likes you.
	You don't have to be a Republican.
	You don't have to be conservative in any way, shape, or form.
	Oh, this is a very attractive person.
	Let's put him or her up.
	They're a celebrity.
	Let's put them up. What do they believe?
	Who cares? Put them up.
	I endorse them. They look good.
	They'll win. No.
	No, we had a lot of that happening.
	And so then he blames the people because they stood on the principle of life.
	Because he doesn't have any principles.
	He said, these people pushed so hard for decades, and they just plain disappeared.
	Well, maybe they voted for other Republicans, but they didn't vote for your candidates.
	Because maybe your candidates were not going to support what they believed.
	There are concerns that Texas' abortion ruling will upend the FDA authority.
	This came out yesterday on Meet the Press.
	Chuck Todd running it, and he was interviewing Louisiana Senator Cassidy.
	And he said, do you worry about the upending, about upending a status quo and sort of upending the FDA's authority in a way that will be, you know, create sort of a chaos in the pharmaceutical industry?
	Asked Todd. This is about the abortion pill.
	Mephistopheles. I know it's Mephapristone or something.
	I think it's better to just call it Mephistopheles.
	So we understand what's really involved here.
	Look, the key thing about the abortion pill is not just killing babies, it's also killing mothers too.
	Because dispensing this stuff remotely without an exam, as I've had multiple guests on to talk about this, that is a prescription to kill the mother.
	Because if the baby is too far along, trying to eliminate the baby at home, kill them, and then try to eliminate them from your body, that can kill you.
	They don't want to tell people that.
	They don't. The FDA doesn't care about our health.
	Look at the vaccine. Look at the Trump shot.
	So Chuck Todd says he's not worried about The life of the baby?
	He's not worried about the life of the mother.
	He's worried about the authority of the FDA. And the pharmaceutical industry.
	Because, you know, the people there at Meet the Press and NBC. Good Morning America is brought to you by Pfizer.
	They're all brought to you by Pfizer, right?
	So what about, he says, will it create chaos in the pharmaceutical industry?
	Senator Cassidy said, I think that's totally alarmist.
	It's totally alarmist.
	And by the way, when did the FDA think they could go above the law?
	So, first of all, alarmist.
	Let's not alarm our masters, the pharmaceutical industry.
	We don't want to get these people angry with us, right?
	But secondly, why did the FDA think they could go above the law?
	If it can ignore the Administrative Procedure Act, he says, which every other agency has to follow, theoretically.
	He added that theoretically.
	You know, we have a constitution here, theoretically.
	We have a, theoretically, we've got a constitution that would prohibit the full existence of the FDA, by the way.
	But we also have this Administrative Procedure Act where they are supposed to not put themselves in opposition to what the Congress has put out, right?
	That's the gist of it.
	He said every other agency has to follow this theoretically.
	But they don't have to? So, I mean, I think that's alarmist, and I also think that the FDA should not be above the law.
	It should not be above the Constitution.
	It should not be above the Tenth Amendment.
	It shouldn't even exist.
	But again, that's what we are most concerned about.
	So, the Colorado governor, with all this happening, has signed a bill targeting pro-life pregnancy centers.
	And then protecting abortion and sex changes at the same time.
	Let's see, who is it, what institution is it that does both abortions and sex changes?
	Well, that's Planned Parenthood.
	They do both.
	You know, they provide the, they don't do the sex changes, but they provide the pills that do the sterilization and mutilating the kids chemically.
	So they provide that, but we're not supposed to notice that this guy, Paulus, is in the pocket of the pharmaceutical companies as well as Planned Parenthood.
	But he does want to shut down all of those crisis pregnancy centers.
	Don't want you to see a video of the baby inside of you moving around.
	Because then you'd understand it's not your body, it's another person in there.
	We'll be right back. Analyzing
	The Globalist Next Move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	you Let's talk about the pharmaceutical industry.
	There was an event organized by Bright Light News.
	This is described, I don't know of them.
	I saw this article on Rebel News.
	They say it's an independent media outlet, Bright Light News.
	And so they had several doctors that we've all, you know, have been outspoken throughout this stuff and have told people the truth and have paid the price for it.
	And they're talking about concerns over not just what is happening, the health concerns and the cover-ups and the purging and the banning of people, but also This mRNA being put into the food chain.
	That was a part of the safety concerns that they were addressing.
	Doctors Ryan Cole, Kate Lindley, Pierre Corey.
	This took place April the 6th in Toronto is why Rebel News has it.
	Dr. Pierre Corey, a founding member of the Frontline COVID Critical Care Alliance.
	Talked about the suppression of evidence in early treatment.
	And the repurposing of drugs to treat COVID-19.
	And the corruption involved a big pharmaceutical shilling for profits.
	Of course, that was a key part of all of that.
	And Donald Trump had a role to play in that, of course.
	You know, to make a mockery of HCQ or ivermectin or anything else.
	You know, talk about that in the same time.
	Well, couldn't we inject sunlight into our veins?
	This guy's a lunatic.
	So, you know, anything that he says about ivermectin or anything, that's just, you know, ridiculous.
	And just dismiss it out of hand.
	And of course, it was something that these drugs had been used.
	HCQ, ivermectin have been used for decades.
	So we know what the safety profile of it is.
	If it's safe enough to be used billions of times by people, then why wouldn't you allow someone to try this for what you're trying to convince everybody is the worst pandemic we've ever seen in human history?
	Why wouldn't you allow people to see if it was effective if we already know that it is safe?
	No, they wanted to push out something that they had absolutely no reason for people to expect that it was safe or effective.
	The default position of the FDA has never been that everything that comes to them is safe and effective, and you have to prove otherwise.
	It's just the opposite. The burden of proof is on the people with a new drug, except for the Trump shots.
	Dr. Lindley spoke in depth about the World Health Organization's ongoing power grab, and of course there's two aspects of this.
	It is now being debated.
	And the UK as well.
	They want to have the ability to override governments anywhere.
	I mean, we're taking this whole medical martial law, public health dictatorship to an international level where they can point the finger at any area of the world and shut it down, claiming that there's a pandemic there.
	It's not just a pandemic treaty.
	Even more importantly, it's the rules that they're changing to give them presumed legal authority to do this type of thing.
	Dr. Ryan Cole, one of only two pathologists conducting autopsies on vaccinated individuals, explained, quote, cells do not lie, unquote.
	He shared slides with the audience showing massive accumulation of spike protein and bodily tissue that the public has been told over and over again is not possible.
	Well, who are you going to believe? Your lying eyes or the lying media that has lied to us now for three years?
	Viral immunologist Dr.
	Byram Brittle further compounded the concerns over the distribution of this novel product.
	It was confirmed by the Journal of the American Medical Association's network, the JAMA network, in a study that showed that mRNA transferred into the milk of breastfeeding mothers.
	And, of course, we also have had the studies that show that it was passed on in milk, which is one of the reasons why people are concerned about the contamination of food supply.
	They tell us, oh, we're going to go vaccinate the animals.
	That's no big deal. They will metabolize the vaccine before it ever gets into the food supply or before you eat them.
	Well, that's not true. Because of the study showing that they were able to pass it on in mother's milk.
	If you give mRNA vaccines to food-producing animals, this could potentially get into the milk, said Dr.
	Ryan Cole, and Dr.
	Bridal, Byron Bridal.
	He said, therefore, we could be consuming these mRNA vaccines, their components or their derivatives, and Dr.
	Bridle uses cow milk as an example, but says that this extends to any form of meat consumption.
	He says, look, you're injecting this into the muscle.
	We know that it doesn't just stay in the muscle.
	The biodistribution goes throughout the body.
	But it does go into the muscle first.
	And so you're going to be getting some of this if you consume the meat.
	Bridal also referred to poultry.
	He says it's unknown as to whether or not the mRNA concentrates in eggs.
	Well, I think it's interesting that in some of the early preliminary studies that they did before they did any tests, they found that the biodistribution of the mRNA was primarily in the ovaries of rats.
	The only other place where it was slightly higher was Was in the spleen, which its function is to sweep impurities out of the blood.
	But the two of them were two orders of magnitude higher than any other part of the body.
	So the concentration in the ovaries was very high.
	When that came out, their response was, well, let's just stop the testing.
	We don't want anybody to see this, and we don't want to talk about it.
	Russia is accusing the U.S., meanwhile, of working on a universal genetically engineered bioweapon.
	Wait a minute. Isn't that what the shots are from Trump and Operation Warp Speed?
	Isn't that what they are? Isn't it a universal, genetically engineered bioweapon?
	I think it is. They say something that is capable of infecting not only people, but animals as well.
	Well, you know, this is a bioweapon.
	It has to be injected, but it can easily inject it into the animals.
	Not just the human sheep.
	Relying on evidence supplied by the Russian military on U.S. military biological activities in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, the caucus, and countries in Africa and Asia, the commission singled out the, quote, key role, unquote, of overseas facilities in enforcing the U.S.-led bioweapons programs.
	And of course, the UN doesn't want us to look at those labs, just like they don't want us to look at Nord Stream.
	None of this stuff, right?
	When they block it off and they don't want you to look at it, that may be one of the indications of what you do want to look at.
	You know, these are essentially redacted activities.
	I just want to, you know, as I said before about Elon Musk, it really is amazing to watch how this guy operates.
	You know, he does a great job of shutting down the BBC censors.
	While at the same time, studies show censorship is worse under him and the punishments are more severe.
	He is talking about how, you know, working on Neuralink and monitoring our brains and the wonders of the technocracy.
	And living forever.
	Meanwhile, saying, well, we've got to have more kids while he pushes these other issues on us.
	Warning us about artificial intelligence and then creating his own company.
	Within a week, he releases it after he pushed out a moratorium on it.
	And so he's there with the vaccines as well.
	It's not just with artificial intelligence or free speech or these others.
	It's also there with the mRNA vaccines.
	If you go back to the summer of 2020, I talked about it at the time, but I haven't talked about it for a very long time.
	Elon Musk teamed up with CureVac to build an mRNA, what they called mRNA microfactories.
	Here's yet another billionaire savior.
	He's going to save our free speech and he's going to save humanity.
	And yet, he's right there at the forefront with all the brain-computer interface, artificial intelligence, transhumanism, the mRNA vaccines, everything else.
	Back in 2020, Elon Musk has joined the global tech crusade the summer of 2020.
	Now underway to revolutionize vaccine manufacturing, now aimed at delivering billions of doses of a new mRNA vaccine to fight COVID-19.
	In a late-night tweet on Wednesday, he announced Tesla as a side project is building RNA microfactories for CureVac and possibly others.
	You see, he and Gates are all making sure that they are going to profit from this, profit from killing people.
	And then we update this to January of this year.
	That was July of 2020.
	Now, January 2023, Musk shares details about the mRNA microfactories that he's putting together for CureVac in his January statements.
	He had talked about how this all began back in February of 2019.
	You know, February 2019 was three months before Trump said this.
	They have to get the shot.
	The vaccination is so important.
	Right. So, you know, that was when they took away religious exemptions for kids in New York and some other places.
	You're going to have to get that measles shot.
	It's so important. This thing is going around.
	That was May. And, you know, in January, Trump had gone to Davos.
	Seemed to get along fabulously with Klaus Schwab.
	Yes, there were some public disagreements, but there's all, you know, handshakes and patting on the back and all the rest of this stuff.
	And then Elon Musk in February.
	So January, Trump's at Davos.
	February, this goes on with Elon Musk.
	CureVac published a press release that referred to a bioreactor that they dubbed the RNA printer.
	And he said, Tesla makes, when he talked about it, he said, Tesla makes the RNA bioreactor that can make vaccines and cures.
	Oh, vaccines or cures?
	Did you know that? I didn't know that.
	I thought the whole purpose of vaccines...
	Talk about the way they've gaslighted people.
	Well, you know, natural immunity, that's not a thing.
	You only get immunity if you've got a vaccine.
	What, according to their vaccine theory, was the purpose of a vaccine?
	A vaccine was not a therapeutic.
	A vaccine did not cure anybody.
	A vaccine was supposed to prevent you from getting it.
	How is it supposed to prevent you from getting it?
	By exposing you to a weak...
	Or dead pathogen.
	So your body would recognize that pathogen, not be threatened by it.
	It's dead or it's weak.
	And your body's immune system sees that, figures out how to destroy it, and then remembers that.
	Isn't that amazing? That your body, your immune system can remember it.
	It's amazing because your immune system remembers it forever forever.
	Yeah, that's why George Washington, when he got smallpox, actually came down with it.
	He didn't have to worry about it when there was a smallpox epidemic that was going through the Army.
	He'd had it decades prior to that.
	And yet they wanted to tell us that natural immunity wouldn't work.
	If you'd been exposed to something and recovered, no, you wouldn't have an immunity to it like George Washington did to smallpox.
	Now, that's not a thing, said the scientists.
	But, yeah, it doesn't cure anything.
	But he was saying that, you know, this is the way we manufacture the vaccines and the cures.
	CureVac, he said, has version 2 in use.
	Version 3 is under development.
	I do expect this to be an important product for the world, but probably not important financially for Tesla, he said on Twitter.
	And that was when somebody asked him, you know, how does this...
	And that was in November of 2020.
	So in July of 2020, he says we're working on this.
	November, they said, is this something you're going to make a lot of money?
	No, we're not going to make a lot of money out of it.
	We're just doing this because we're good guys.
	Now we get to today, Musk is referring to diseases as, quote, a software problem.
	Oh. We heard that before as well.
	I said, for the longest time, they're reprogramming your body.
	Oh, that's a conspiracy there. Shut up.
	It's a genetic code injection.
	Shut up. No. If you look at Moderna's site, what do they say?
	This is like software.
	You know, we're reprogramming your body.
	Well, we're talking about genetic modification.
	We're talking about DNA then.
	And even when they say, well, the purpose of mRNA is only to copy DNA. Well, if it can copy DNA, and if it does it wrong, then it's going to modify it, right?
	If it's a bad copy.
	But we had Thomas Jefferson University, a small college, to the chagrin of the medical establishment, but they just ignored it.
	But a small college there said, yeah, you can use mRNA to change DNA. We've just done it in our experiment.
	That went up, and everybody ignored it, pretty much.
	I reported on it, but for the most part, mainstream media shut that down and pretended that that report did not exist.
	So, he said, it's a software problem.
	With that perspective, Tesla seems more capable of developing technology to manufacture mRNA vaccines at scale.
	And they have set up the CureVac headquarters in Germany.
	So, you know, as last week, of course, this is an article written in January 2023.
	Last week, CureVac reported positive results in Phase 1 of its COVID vaccine candidates.
	We're very encouraged by the interim Phase 1 data.
	It represents a critical milestone in our COVID vaccine program and strongly support the advancement of our vaccine candidate, said Dr.
	Franz Wernerhaus. Yeah, like Werner von Braun.
	The rockets go up, the rockets go down.
	Says Werner Von Braun.
	What makes vaccine skeptics change their mind?
	I think it's time we go back and we take a look at how they deceived us because this thing has not ended.
	I point out another $5 billion has just been targeted for a new round of new COVID-19 vaccines by the Biden administration in response to what is supposedly a new variant.
	It's not going to end.
	And so we have to look at the way they have tried to deceive us.
	I think, you know, one of the things that got me really upset over this weekend was to look at how...
	It made me stop and think when I saw that Todd Friel was going to be speaking to the homeschoolers group here in Tennessee.
	They're going to be in Pigeon Forge, I think.
	Homeschooling convention there.
	And Todd Friel is going to be speaking there.
	Do you remember who Todd Friel was?
	Well, you know, Todd Friel was this guy who was telling everybody, telling Christians, if the government tells you to do something, you've got to do it.
	Absolutely. Totally. And he went so far as to say this.
	I believe that if the government tells me to put pinwheels on the side of my head every time that I go to Publix, I'm going to put pinwheels on the side of my head.
	Well, not me, and I'll do it with a clear conscience, because you completely don't understand what you're talking about.
	He says, show me the scripture where God talks about a vaccine and government.
	Well, if you don't have that, we've got to derive some principles.
	And so I'm going to tell you what Romans 13 says.
	Totally misconstrues Romans 13.
	Totally rejects the doctrine of the lesser magistrate.
	Which is not really a doctrine about lesser magistrates as much as it is a doctrine about government that God ordains is a minister for your good.
	And people would say, well, Paul wrote that when the church was undergoing tremendous persecution by the Roman government.
	Well, he didn't say anywhere in that passage, did he, that the Roman government was legitimate and Paul went to prison because he challenged the Roman government over illegitimate things.
	No, you violated my due process.
	I demand my due process.
	When he had leaders of the community trying to arrest him and put him in jail, he escaped.
	He had some people lower him over the wall.
	He didn't passively go along with everything that the government told him to do.
	He's the one who wrote to the Romans that.
	No, it is an agent from God for your good if what it is doing is good.
	That is completely consistent with the Declaration of Independence that says that God has endowed us with certain inalienable rights and that to protect those rights, we create government as an agent for your good, right?
	The Declaration of Independence is not in opposition to To the correct understanding of Romans 13.
	Instead, it underscores it.
	Romans 13 is used by some people like Pinwheel Friel to tell you that you have to obey everything the government says.
	And so I looked at that and I thought, he's speaking at the homeschooling convention?
	How is it that after three years of this, and I looked for hours yesterday to see if I could find anywhere where this guy took that back, I couldn't see anywhere where he took that back.
	Why is it that the people who have sold us out, who have betrayed us from Trump To Pinwheel Friel.
	Why is it that these people are still held up in leadership positions?
	Why are we still listening to people like Alex Jones and Mike Adams who lied you into a fear about the pandemic so they could sell you food?
	Why do these people occupy this position of trust and authority?
	Why is everybody giving all this money to Trump to do it all again?
	The only answer is that in this life we will not have justice for the most part.
	Thank you.
	Evil men will be in power.
	Deceivers will be in power.
	And you better pay attention because people like Pinwheel Friel are going to be selling homeschooling kids this idea they have to do everything the government says to do.
	So if the government says, sorry you can't homeschool your kids anymore, Well, that's it.
	I guess I just have to turn them over to the government and let them do whatever perverse things they want to do with my kids, and I don't have any say-so in it.
	I just need to, you know. Maybe he's got a table at the homeschool convention that he's set up where he's selling pinwheels, pinwheel hats to people.
	Maybe that would be the thing for him to do.
	Because he doubled down on this thing more than once.
	I covered it when he made this.
	He did that at the time.
	It was August of 2021.
	Just as everybody knew, it had been announced that the FDA was going to give it its full approval.
	You know, there's authorization, then there's approval.
	You have to understand what they mean by that from a legal standpoint.
	Well, we're going to give it our full approval.
	It was emergency use authorized.
	Now we're going to give it full approval.
	And so now it can be mandated by the government.
	It can be mandated by employers and on and on.
	So we knew that was going to happen in September.
	So in August, as all this is happening, Pinwheel Friel pulls that on people, puts that burden on Christians.
	He never talked, by the way.
	As I could find it, I don't think he ever discussed the moral objections that people would have to taking something that was produced by tests involving aborted babies.
	And of course, you know, sometimes some of these quote-unquote religious leaders would address that in a tangential way.
	But there's also the issue of the mark of the beast.
	You know, the beast, meaning government.
	That's what beast is referring to throughout Revelation and other places in the Bible.
	And so, you know, when you look at this, was it the mark of the beast?
	I say it was. I say it was.
	In the same way that is somebody who opposes Christ, is that antichrist?
	Yeah, by definition.
	You know, John said there are many antichrists in the world.
	The spirit of antichrist is in the world and there are many of them.
	Isn't a the antichrist.
	He wasn't even talking about that.
	And so in the sense of, is this the mark of the beast or a mark of government?
	To tell you that you've got to do X and be identified by this or we're not going to let you do anything?
	There are many of those things.
	There have been people in terms of opposing that said, well, you know, look, people said this about the Social Security system.
	The Social Security number said that was the mark of the beast.
	It was. It was.
	Because just in the same sense that somebody who opposes Christ is anti-Christ, something that is a training wheel system for this.
	You don't think that the devil is as clever as Fauci?
	Fauci said you do it from the inside.
	You do it iteratively.
	You don't think all these things are training for something bigger that's coming?
	You don't think they're incremental, iterative steps?
	Absolutely they are!
	Absolutely. I stand by that.
	I stand by the fact that the Social Security number put on our driver's licenses is wrong as well.
	But it just keeps getting more and more of this.
	So we go back to July of 2021 as they're rolling up to what is it that we're going to do now to coerce people?
	We've had Trump who developed it for everybody.
	Nobody wanted to criticize that.
	The Democrats did until as soon as Trump was out.
	Oh, it's now safe. It's now safe because Trump's not in office.
	And then they would tell everybody, well, you got to do it for your friends.
	You got to do it for family.
	You got to do it to be a good Christian and love your neighbor and all the rest of this nonsense.
	And then when people still didn't want to take it, you know, you play the science card, you give people lotteries, you incentivize this, and then the carrots start coming out.
	All right. Everybody that we can gaslight into doing this, everybody that we can deceive into doing this, we've done that.
	So now we're going to have to start beating people into submission.
	And so in July of 2021...
	What makes vaccine skeptics change their mind?
	This is the Poynter Institute.
	Do you remember where the Poynter Institute is?
	Remember when they first started saying back in 2017, 2018, well, you know, we've got to take people off if they're telling you lies about things.
	And so, well, who's going to be the arbiter of truth?
	Well, we've got the Poynter Institute.
	We can use them.
	Who are they? Poynter Institute's got a little campus down in Florida.
	It's like Sarasota or Clearwater or St.
	Pete or something like that. Somewhere in that area where I used to live.
	And it's like at the time, they did remote classes and things like that.
	They had less than a half dozen instructors and journalists would take classes from them and get accreditation from them.
	There's a little degree mill that you could pay them some money, you know, take a little class.
	And it's like, oh, look, I took this and I'm a serious journalist now.
	And so they turn to the Poynter Institute.
	They turn to PolitiFact and things like that.
	Oh, they're going to be our standards of what truth is.
	They're going to decide what's true.
	And so this is a report from the Poynter Institute.
	Talking about how the Kaiser Family Foundation wanted to know what motivates people who were opposed to taking the COVID vaccine.
	And it goes on a lot of different pages here.
	I'm not going to go into all of them, but suffice it to say, what it was doing was essentially recapping the Yale study that had been published a year earlier in July of 2020 about how they could lie to and gaslight people.
	As of July 2021, they said one-fifth of adults, 21% now, report being vaccinated after saying in January they planned on waiting to get vaccinated or would only get it if required.
	Many of these individuals noted the role of their friends and their family members as well as their personal doctors in persuading them to get a vaccine.
	This is why it makes me so angry to see people who have not I apologize, even, for doing this.
	Have you seen any apologies from Franklin Graham or Al Mohler or Pinwheel Friel for this stuff?
	I haven't. I haven't.
	As a matter of fact, Franklin Graham knew it wasn't a pandemic because he put his people there in New York City at the very beginning and then pulled them out when nobody was filling up the beds.
	New York City was supposed to be the epicenter worldwide of this thing.
	Trump knew as well because Trump had sent a 2,500-person hospital bed.
	We saw the pictures of it to scare everybody as they were laying it out.
	And all of the beds were empty.
	Oh, look what we're preparing for the big wave of people coming.
	And, you know, they just quietly packed up and went home.
	Hospital ships, New York City, L.A. Nobody used them.
	They took them away. Trump knew all that.
	What about all those news reports about how they're burying people in Central Park?
	Do we have any...
	Are those mass graves memorialized?
	Were they ever real?
	What do you think? Why is it that the people like Franklin Graham and Donald Trump don't tell us what they now know?
	And in a sense, it bothers me more...
	Then this guy...
	And not just to think about, well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here.
	No. Screw your freedom.
	Yeah. Now, he kind of did a...
	He didn't really even apologize.
	He said, well, maybe I put it the wrong way.
	He didn't say it was the wrong thing to do.
	Maybe I should have just said it a little bit more delicately.
	Right? But these other people who stabbed us in the back, you know, Schwarzenegger goes out and he fills a pothole in his neighborhood.
	You know, oh look, I'm a good citizen here.
	I'm filling the potholes out here.
	You know, these other people who did it to us, they've not corrected the misinformation.
	We know what has happened now.
	We know that they were lying.
	We know that they're still killing people.
	And we know that the people who were injured have not gotten any compensation for it.
	And here's the point, folks.
	We know they're coming back.
	And these people who lied to us for years are still in charge of these institutions, still influencing people out there.
	Here's one going back even before the COVID-19 lockdown.
	This is a group called the Gospel Coalition.
	They've been kind of left-leaning on some theological issues.
	But, you know, starting to go woke, I should say.
	You know, they're some of the first ones. This is going back to 2019.
	And this was the time when Trump was saying, gotta get the measles shots.
	Don't care about the fact that this is a private school.
	I don't care that you have religious objections to this.
	You're going to get the measles shots.
	And so they're saying the FAQ is what Christians should know about vaccines.
	And again, this is about the measles vaccine.
	They were preparing people in 2019 for this.
	To be sheep. To go along.
	To get the shot. To put the pinwheel on their head.
	New York joins California, Mississippi, West Virginia in disallowing exemptions on religious groups.
	So they say, well, what are the benefits?
	This is what the headings here.
	I'll just read you the headings. What are the benefits of vaccination?
	Oh, one of humankind's greatest inventions.
	That was one of the talking points that Yale used and weaponized and tested.
	The same thing we saw.
	Al Mohler, Franklin Graham.
	You know, we should praise God for science.
	This is like a moonshot.
	It's like, do they realize that it really is like the moonshot?
	Do they realize just how true that lie is?
	True lies, right? Are vaccinations required by law?
	Why an individual vaccine is a matter of public health concern?
	Well, you know, the purpose of vaccination, said the Gospel Coalition, is not only to immunize an individual, but also to provide immunization for an entire community.
	Again, the herd immunity.
	But as I've said all the time, if you don't have individual health, then you don't have public health.
	Public health is the sum total of individual health.
	If you don't have individual freedom, your country is not free.
	It's just that simple.
	If you don't have individual health and the benefit of the freedom to pursue it.
	But no, no, they talk about herd immunity, the primary benefit of vaccines to both individuals and to society.
	And, of course, when we saw the Warp Speed war against us, We saw that once they got up 60, 70, 80 percent.
	No, no. We don't care.
	We just stopped talking about herd immunity.
	It's got to be 100 percent of you who've got to get this.
	What does it matter, they said, if individuals receive an exemption from vaccines?
	Well, when parents refuse to vaccinate their children for philosophical reasons, they increase the risk of disease exposure for the entire community.
	Do they? No, they don't.
	If your vaccine protects you, you are safe.
	You don't have to worry about me.
	All of us crazy tin foil hat people who refuse to wear a pinwheel on our head, we'll just die and go away and you'll be better off, won't you, without us in your society?
	So if your vaccine works, you're protected.
	If it doesn't work, you don't need to force me to get it.
	They say, are vaccines safe?
	Oh, yes. There are some bad effects, but they occur very rarely.
	This is 2019, of course.
	This is the same. This is why I said, if you knew the lies that they've been telling us for decades about the regular vaccines, you knew they were just recycling the same lies for the Trump shots.
	Oh, it's rare. It's rare.
	You got common side effects like mild redness or swelling where the sight was given.
	Can't vaccines cause autism, says the Gospel Call?
	Oh, no, of course not.
	No, that's been disproven.
	What about vaccines made from aborted fetal tissues?
	Because remember, this is supposedly a Christian organization.
	Well, there's currently no vaccines created by using cells taken directly from the bodies of aborted fetuses.
	They don't talk about the test.
	They don't talk about the organ harvesting, the targeted...
	The murder of kids and the fact that, you know, we're going to be born alive so we can get those organs because, you know, hey, if you poison the kid or you rip the body apart, you're not going to get those organs.
	So you've got to have the baby be born.
	And then you can pull out those organs.
	You can sell them to the government, to NIH, and you can use them to create humanized mice, transhumanism.
	So you've got something to test.
	Again, it comes back to the testing, doesn't it?
	They have no problems with that.
	Should there be exemptions for vaccinations based on religious liberty or parental rights?
	And so they are not on board with that even.
	Not even on board with that.
	They quote Al Mohler, who says, well, I'm very pro-vaccine, but I'm also very pro-parental rights, so we've got to figure out how we balance these things.
	And, of course, guess what?
	They figure out a way that they can balance it to take those things away.
	Third, we should remember that rather than using our liberty to avoid vaccinations, evangelicals have historically been at the forefront of promoting vaccines.
	Yes, Jonathan Edwards did die in 1758, a revered theologian to these people, and I think he's a good example.
	But he did die from a smallpox vaccine, but hey, this is not anything that we need to worry about, right?
	We have a right as parents or religious believers to forego vaccinations, although we may have that right.
	We may have it.
	They won't say we do.
	We also must accept the consequences of our actions.
	And so if we choose not to vaccinate our children, then we must accept that there will be some public institutions where we cannot participate.
	They said this in the context of private religious schools.
	There were Jewish schools up in New York.
	Where they said, no, we're not going to do that.
	They were not public institutions.
	They were private religious schools.
	These people said, well, we've got to accept there's going to be some public institutions where you can't participate.
	This was an anticipation of what was going on.
	Did they know? I knew.
	I knew because I'd seen Dark Winter.
	I'd seen all the simulations that had been happening on an annual basis.
	Did they know? And I've got to just ask, why would Christians be desperate to get into government schools?
	Given the fact that they're seminaries of Satan, why would we be still holding these people who betrayed us, who have blood on their hands?
	No other way to put it.
	They have blood on their hands.
	There are hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of people worldwide that have been crippled, disabled for life with this stuff.
	Who knows how many people have died from this stuff?
	And they're absolutely unrepentant.
	The very best case scenario is that you could say that these pinwheel frills have absolutely no discernment.
	And yet, they're being fed, you know, being brought in to tell people, well, here's how you homeschool and here's how you have, you know, how you raise your kids and all this kind of stuff.
	He hasn't the foggiest idea.
	And it wasn't the only one.
	A whole slew of these things.
	From anti-jab to jab me.
	Here's why some vaccine-hesitant people changed their mind.
	They're going to run all these psyops against us.
	And all of these were, it was like one after the other.
	Just to remind you, right?
	July and August of 2021.
	Formerly anti-vax, but QAnon changed all these things.
	I identified myself, says this person, as a hardcore anti-vaxxer.
	39 years old.
	But the COVID vaccine is the first vaccine I ever got.
	When all the QAnon stuff started coming up, it was just so confronting.
	So there you go. They got it because QAnon opposed it.
	So I'm going to do the opposite of that.
	Here's Michael, 54, from New York, formerly part of the anti-vax community.
	He saw the targeted gaslighting that was being used by the current COVID anti-vaxxers and just how political the situation had become.
	Gaslighting? Gaslighting?
	I wasn't aware that Trump gave the anti-vaxxers $250 million to tell people lies about science and everything else.
	But it is about political for him.
	He said, I am fully certain that much of the current anti-vax movement around the COVID vaccine is the direct result of the massive disinformation campaign tied to QAnon, Trump, and the alt-right, possibly even to foreign governments like Russia.
	Yeah, there you go. This is why they did it.
	They knew they could get these people vaccinated.
	They knew they could get them to stand down if Trump made it.
	They could get the conservatives to stand down.
	And they knew that, you know, even though it was Trump who put the vaccine together, these people literally can't put, you know, one and one together and get two.
	Just can't do it. So for this guy, he says, my motivation to get the COVID vaccine was to join to help stop the disinformation.
	One person said, well, I was very concerned about how fast this was being put together.
	He said, I'm black, and I know how blacks have been experimented on multiple times, like in the Tuskegee experiments and things like that.
	But ultimately, he took it because he said, it was just a no-brainer.
	I was in constant contact with older relatives, and I just couldn't live with myself if I got any of them sick.
	See, that's the Yale study right there.
	Think about how guilty you would be if you gave the vaccine to other people.
	You know, you could give it to them and not even know.
	You could be asymptomatic yourself and spread it to people.
	That's a lie. That's an anti-science lie right there.
	But that worked for people.
	One guy said, well, hey, I was hesitant to get it because I've got peanut and egg allergies.
	Well, does he have any allergies not to eggs but to PEG? PEG? Polyethylene glycol.
	A lot of people had allergies to that.
	It went into anaphylactic shock.
	Finally, I'll just do this last one.
	This person said, well, I was hesitant about this vaccine.
	Because of all the media and the rumors and the discussions that I heard, it's hard to know what's real and what isn't.
	But then her husband, who is 62, got sick.
	And the couple realized that COVID could be a threat to them.
	They said when the test came back negative, you didn't have COVID, right?
	We both cried tears of relief, and it was at that moment we decided both of us were going to go get the vaccine.
	And that's the game they played on a lot of people.
	I'll just mention one other person in general.
	And I don't like to play this game while so-and-so promoted the vaccine and denigrated people who were anti-vax, and look, they died.
	You can play that on both sides of this.
	But this is a good example of how people didn't understand what was being done to them, even as they were being killed.
	Do you want to talk about being gaslighted?
	This is a conservative radio host who is here in Tennessee.
	His name was Phil Valentine.
	And so, over a period of a couple of weeks, you saw these ads that came out.
	And a statement shared by the radio station in Nashville, where he was there.
	They said... He's tested positive.
	He's sick. He's hospitalized with COVID. And out of an abundance of caution, Phil has decided to be put on a ventilator to give his body a much-needed rest.
	We're confident that he will pull through.
	Thank you for your continued prayers, they said.
	The escalation comes after his brother said in an interview that there was no sign that he needed a ventilator to breathe at the time.
	This wasn't out of an abundance of caution.
	It was out of an abundance of greed.
	The hospital could get $39,000 off of that and then charge him to use it.
	Phil Valentine made headlines in the past few days for changing his skeptical stance towards COVID vaccines since falling seriously ill.
	He had made unfounded claims about the safety of the COVID vaccines earlier this year.
	he shared a parody song on radio about personal freedoms called Vaxman.
	And so now, you know, he became the poster child for a couple of weeks of what was going to happen.
	And I got to say, when all this stuff was happening, I just prayed to God that if I died for anything, it would not be something that they could claim was from COVID.
	That's a pretty broad thing.
	Since they had people who had crashed into walls with their motorcycle, you know, in Houston, and the coroner said it was COVID. I just did not want to see them use my death for this.
	He's regretful.
	The radio host who doubted vaccines hospitalized is now hospitalized with COVID, says his family.
	And again, remember, he was doing fine.
	He didn't need to be put on a ventilator, but they talked him into it.
	He went into the hospital.
	He placed all of his faith and confidence in the doctors and said, well, you know, you don't need to get ventilated, but, you know, it would be good if we put you on a ventilator.
	It would give your body a rest.
	You don't really need this in order to breathe, but it'd give your body a rest, and they killed him.
	Because again, about 90% of the people that they put on the ventilators died.
	I remember the nurse who wrote Pandemic Nurse, the book's title was Pandemic Nurse.
	She was in Florida.
	She said, well, we're not seeing anybody coming in with COVID, but I hear that, you know, New York is the epicenter of this and I want to help.
	And so she volunteered to go to New York and said, I'm going to, you know, I know that you need people.
	You're overwhelmed. I see this all in the news, a big pandemic.
	So let me go there and help. And she goes up there and reports in, and two or three days go by, nobody even contacts her.
	Finally, they contact her, and a guy brings her in and shows her a lot of empty beds, not a whole lot of stuff's going on, but they've got some people on the ventilator, and the guy, the doctor who's taking her around says, you know, 80, 90% of these people are going to die.
	They all do, and we put them on this.
	And a pulmonologist said, when I saw this was going to be the protocol, I thought, what are they talking about?
	We've never done that for people who have respiratory illnesses like flu or other things like that.
	So the family said, please continue to pray for his recovery and all uppercase, please go get vaccinated.
	And then finally, the news.
	Conservative talk show host Phil Valentine dies after a battle with COVID-19, says his employer.
	It wasn't a battle with COVID-19.
	It was a battle with lies.
	He succumbed to the lies.
	He succumbed to the medical malpractice.
	Financially incentivized.
	He succumbed to death by government, democide.
	He succumbed to all of that.
	He didn't succumb to COVID-19.
	He was killed by the doctors.
	Just as assuredly as George Washington caught a cold and out of an abundance of caution, they brought in the doctors who bled him to death.
	Bled him to death.
	Out of abundance of caution, he invited the doctors to put him on a ventilator where they killed him.
	So I've got a couple of comments here.
	Rockfin, General McGuffin, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, thank you, Dave, for the Grand Slam reporting analysis of the missed information.
	Well, thank you. I just don't feel good about this.
	I mean, I'm looking at all of these measures still in place.
	And, you know, again, we had the emergency order was taken off, and the other one is going to be taken off.
	The one that created the medical martial law, still in effect, that one from January, from Alex Azar, the pharmaceutical executive Trump put in charge of the FDA. I'm sorry, HHS. And maybe if that gets taken off, maybe, but the FDA says we don't even need an emergency authorization to do this kind of stuff anymore.
	And people haven't pushed back against this, and we're still following the same pied pipers who led us to death, led us to slavery and lockdown.
	Mark Daroba, thank you for the tip on Rockfin.
	He says, thank you for continuing the fight.
	We are going to take a quick break.
	We've got about another 10 minutes left, and we come back.
	I've got some, well, we'll get to it when we come back.
	The End
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk a little bit about what happened in Chicago, because I see this as part of a much bigger story.
	You know, they just had their elections.
	I've seen the cartoons. They showed Lori Lightfoot.
	It's a hardcore socialist.
	And then they showed Brandon, who took her place.
	The guy's name is literally Brandon.
	Let's go, Brandon.
	It's a hardcore Marxist.
	And he has doubled down.
	He doesn't think that any black people should be arrested for crimes.
	I mean, he essentially said that.
	Said as much. And this is what is happening.
	You know, as we look at the shock troops, the front troops of this war to shut us down, the transgender people, they're being told that there's a genocide against them.
	You know, they have these events, Transgender Day of Vengeance.
	They're being told that they're victims and they're being told that anything they do is justified.
	You got Stink Uyghur, the young turds out there saying, well, you know, I don't like guns, but if anybody ought to have guns, it ought to be the transgenders.
	They need to be shooting people up.
	He said that right before, you know, the transgender shot nine-year-old kids, point blank.
	But there is a sense of entitlement that is being produced for the transgender.
	You are victims and you're entitled to do whatever you want and you will not be held accountable.
	And the same thing is being done to black teenagers throughout our school systems and with our political systems and with the media.
	You know, we just had, and I didn't talk about it when it happened, it was last week, the end of the week last week.
	This broke on Thursday last week.
	And Target had a security guard Who was on video.
	He punched a woman who demanded $1,000 in reparations.
	She was basically shoplifting a bunch of stuff.
	And she said, you know, these are my reparations.
	And got real aggressive with the guy.
	And told her she needed to chill or leave the store.
	She's acting aggressively. Instead, she charged him, backed him into his office.
	And that's when he hit her in the face, called the police.
	But again, this is a sense of entitlement.
	I'm entitled to just take this stuff.
	This is one of the reasons why we are seeing the weaponized Soros chaos as district attorneys and these attorneys general telling people they can just go in and take whatever they want.
	You want to hit somebody because of the skin color that they are?
	And you're entitled to do that.
	We're not going to do anything to you about that.
	We might arrest you, but we'll turn you right back out.
	And we're not even going to prosecute you for shoplifting.
	Why would she be...
	She thinks that she's entitled.
	This is her reparations, as she pointed out.
	And when you look at what is happening in California, the panel that is trying to feed the California Reparations Task Force...
	Said in an interview they aren't even concerned with how much this is going to cost.
	You know, we can forgive debts to black people.
	We can give them millions of dollars.
	We don't really care, right?
	We really don't care. Like I said, they don't care about any of the money that they spend.
	Oh, they're absolutely adamant that they've got to raise taxes to pay for what?
	When are they ever concerned about paying for anything?
	They're just going to debt, right?
	Well, if the debt doesn't matter and you've got modern monetary theory, MMT, then none of this stuff matters.
	Why do you have to tax us for this stuff?
	Well, for the same reason, they said, well, we...
	We, you know, can't shut down these poppy fields.
	You know, what would these poor poppy farmers do?
	Well, you'd put them on foreign aid, or you'd put them on welfare, or you'd put them on anything, right?
	But no, they won't apply that much.
	No, the logic is these people have to work for a living, and we want them working to make, you know, poppies for opium and opioids for the CIA to sell, and for us to weaponize against societies.
	And so they don't care what this is going to cost.
	And in this environment of entitlement, take a look at what happened in Chicago.
	We've got a big group, this is at a distance, a big group of black teenagers there.
	Now look at this. They run out and they start attacking these cars en masse.
	En masse. And this is happening all over Chicago on the weekend.
	And here, I'll play another one for you.
	Here they are. Look at what they've done to this car.
	Set it on fire, smashed in the windows.
	And these are videos that were posted by some of the people participating in it.
	They're just entitled to destroy whatever they see there because they've been told they're victims.
	Yeah, here's another one.
	Another angle of this same stuff.
	Because so many people were filming it, right?
	Hundreds of teenagers flood into downtown Chicago, smashing car windows, prompting police response.
	See, this is a manufactured civil war.
	It's what they want to do in terms of bringing people from foreign countries in, because as the economy tanks and things get difficult, There's going to be riots.
	They want to have a society that is going to be set against each other.
	But all this stuff about reparations is purely weaponized.
	It is weaponized in terms of what they're telling.
	A large group of riots in the streets.
	Two teens were shot.
	Drivers attacked. Cars set ablaze.
	Now, you had two people who were shot, but for the most part, this stuff was all being done by hand.
	So, I don't know, you could ban rifles and things like that, and we could all feel good about that, but the real issue, again, just like we're talking about with pornography, the issue is the heart.
	The heart and how these kids have been trained.
	A sense of entitlement, of victimhood, of resentment, and of hate.
	Hate is the product.
	Hate and division.
	It's the product of our schools.
	How hypocritical of them to say that they have to have censorship to stop hate and divisive misinformation when that is all that they do.
	And of course, they were terrorizing tourists and everybody else in Chicago.
	And it's only going to get worse.
	Because again, the...
	The new mayor of Chicago has essentially given them carte blanche to do this.
	They've got a blank check to do whatever they want.
	They're entitled to do it because they are victims in the same way that the trannies are victims and entitled to do whatever they want.
	So he says, well, I don't condone this and it's unacceptable, but it's not constructive to demonize youth.
	We were the ones who did it to them.
	We made them do that.
	They're entitled to do it for reparations, to destroy society, the community that they live in, by the way.
	That's it for today's broadcast.
	Thank you for joining us.
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲