Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 5, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:00

The David Knight Show - 04/05/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	And the circus just got larger.
	It's interesting as I look at all the news, how it has just completely dominated everything.
	Well, we've got other things to talk about today.
	We'll be talking about the threats to our freedom.
	From artificial intelligence, from CBDC, and people's reactions to it as well.
	But we will begin with what is happening in the biggest circus.
	The two-ring circus.
	It's not a three-ring circus, but it is Barnum& Bailey World, isn't it?
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, as usual, Babylon Bee encapsulated it perfectly.
	Democrats throw the biggest ever fundraiser for the Trump campaign.
	Trump's campaign fundraising is breaking records, and it has.
	Thanks to lavish fundraiser hosted by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and the Democrat Party, his campaign raised millions from energized citizens eager to support the only presidential candidate indicted by a Soros-funded DA. This is the way this works.
	And I said, why are they doing this?
	Do the Democrats not know this?
	Yes, some do. Some have spoken out criticizing this, saying, you realize this is only going to help him.
	Of course they realize that.
	Why do you think they're doing this?
	We've seen over and over again the Democrats, in order to help their side, We'll encourage people to vote when they have open primaries.
	You don't have to register to be in a party.
	Or they'll even register temporarily as Republicans and then change their registration later.
	In order to pick the candidate that they think is the easiest to defeat.
	Or the candidate that will do the most damage to either Republican Party or whatever.
	And that's what they're doing right now.
	And I think they also have, especially Soros, has another agenda here.
	And that is to radically divide the country into these two warring partisan factions to drive us into a civil war.
	Let's not pay attention to all the issues.
	I mean, what is happening in Manhattan?
	Well, you've got the commercial real estate is melting down.
	As Gerald Salenti has been pointing out for a very long time, what is now finally happening?
	You know, they're selling stuff at more than 50% off.
	But let's not talk about that.
	Let's get everybody in Manhattan excited because we're going to indict Trump.
	Going back to the Babylon Bee, they said, at this point, if someone hasn't been indicted by a corrupt Soros district attorney, can you even trust that person?
	Said a local Trump voter.
	At publishing time, it had been revealed that half the donations to the Trump campaign came from Democrat activists desperately hoping he runs again.
	Well, of course, that's not true.
	All they have to do...
	Is turn him into a victim and everybody goes running to him.
	Except he victimized us, if I remember.
	But look at all this stuff.
	Trump, according to some of the people on the inside, don't know if this is true or not.
	It was reported by the anti-Trump press, so consider the source.
	But they said they had a lot of people who contacted them and said that Trump wanted To be handcuffed, photographed as handcuffed.
	He wanted a mugshot.
	Well, they didn't give him that.
	But pretty much all the rest of this is kind of like Briar Rabbit and getting thrown into the Briar Patch.
	Uh, Briar Patch?
	Oh, Manhattan District Attorney right there.
	I'm glad I thought of that.
	Yes, indeed. I swear I'm glad I thought of that.
	But you ain't gonna bring me in there, is you?
	Me? Oh, no.
	We don't do that.
	No, sir.
	We wouldn't do that.
	Oh, it's so bad.
	He's got millions of dollars, right?
	Those are the leaves.
	Trump's got the millions of dollars, right?
	No!
	No!
	Yes, sir, brother fucker!
	I was born and bred in the brown patchy.
	Yes, sir, born and bred in the brown patchy.
	Yeah, Trump loves that bar patch.
	He loves all the trouble. He loves all the controversy.
	Come on, criticize him. He loves it.
	That's where he lives.
	He's born in that.
	He's in that bar patch now.
	Don't throw me in that bar patch.
	Controversy, yeah. As a matter of fact, his fundraising, I said yesterday, you know, $4 million.
	No, quickly it went to five.
	That's just the first 24 hours.
	Second 24 hours, it went up to $5 million.
	And now...
	After the first three days, they got up to $7 million.
	Yeah, don't throw me in that bar patch.
	It's filled with money.
	And even people who despise him, like John Bolton, Says this is going to be rocket fuel for his campaign.
	Rocket fuel for his campaign financially as well as many other things.
	And, you know, John Bolton, this diehard neocon, that really bothers him because, you know, he wants real rocket fuel for real rockets that he can launch at people.
	It doesn't really matter who. He just wants to, you know, let's build some rockets and launch them at some people.
	Anyway, he says, I'm not worried about Alvin Bragg hurting Donald Trump.
	I'm worried about Alvin Bragg benefiting Donald Trump.
	That's right, this whole thing is a Trump benefit.
	It's a pageant. It's a circus.
	It's a briar patch.
	It's the Donald Trump benefit.
	The Manhattan melodrama is a Donald Trump benefit.
	It's a charitable organization.
	If Trump is acquitted or he gets the case dismissed because it's not legally sufficient or for whatever reason, that will be rocket fuel.
	Because he can say, I told you it was a political prosecution.
	I told you I was being picked on.
	And now I've been vindicated.
	Well, I think he'll say that even if he's convicted.
	But we'll come back to what Bolton thinks is going to happen if he were convicted.
	And I think the case looks even weaker after you see the indictment that's been released.
	I'll tell you why. Even Politico, which is hard left and partisan, all the rest, looked at this and said, no.
	That really looks weak. That's it?
	That's what you've got? I don't think he's going to be convicted.
	But you know, before this happened, and before he raised the $7 million, Forbes was reporting that his net worth had plunged $700 million because of the Truth Social flop.
	They said the former president's fortune dropped from an estimated $3.2 billion last fall to $2.5 billion today.
	The biggest reason?
	His social media business, once hyped to the moon, has now come crashing down and raising $550 million from his net worth so far.
	But as they point out, as they do the analysis, they look at what happened when he put together this SPAC, this special purpose acquisition company.
	It's one of these things. Look, they come up with these rigged financial instruments.
	It's kind of like the securitization of mortgages that was the thing that pulled everything down.
	That was the pin that burst the bubble.
	SPAC is another one of these garbage.
	But, of course, he used it.
	And so, special purpose acquisition company, they had valued the stocks at $10, and it shot up to $175 in just two days.
	And so, if you multiply that out, you get a market capitalization of $22 billion.
	And everybody said, well, of course, it's not worth that.
	And... Never really lined up with reality.
	They had some people who wanted to buy in once it was back down to $45.
	They said, we'll buy in, but we want some special privileges.
	And we'll be able to do this and that as long as it stays above $10.
	So they consider that to be the threshold.
	So Forbes said, we'll consider the $10 to be kind of the baseline there.
	Unfortunately, it's not growing, even as diehard fans are not going there much.
	And when you look at its traffic, as they did, and they compare it to Twitter, you look at the number of users, compare them to Twitter, they said shares of his SPAC now are 92% off of their highs, trading at $14 apiece.
	A level that suggests the former president's business is worth $1.2 billion.
	Even that seems absurdly high, they said.
	Fundamental problem is users.
	They had said it was going to attract 81 million users by 2026, but right now they're at 5, and they're not growing very quickly either.
	So they said Trump owns about 85% of this business.
	If you use the same metrics to value it that people have used to value Twitter, they said Twitter is worth an estimated $42 per user, then that would bring him down, excuse me, That would bring it down to $180 million today.
	And they said that would take him from being number 205 on the list of billionaires.
	The 205th richest person in the world.
	That would take him down to being on the billionaire list.
	That would go from 205 to 1,217.
	That's how many billionaires there are out there.
	As a matter of fact, there's more than that.
	Isn't that pretty interesting?
	There's that many billionaires.
	1,200 of them, of course, that's still a very, very small percentage.
	They said, but what's even more troubling for Trump is what is happening to the real estate market in Manhattan, because that's where he really has focused his money.
	And it's not just that the real estate market in Manhattan is collapsing, but they said a recent analysis says that Trump Tower was overinflated in terms of its square feet.
	They claimed that it was 246,000 square feet of retail and office space, but property records show 235,000 square feet, 53,000 of which cover less valuable common elements like elevators, public restrooms, and mechanical spaces that you can't earn any money off.
	So they had put it in as office space and retail, 246,000.
	Turns out that the office space and retail, according to the public records that he put in there, and you deduct out things like elevators and restrooms, it's not 246,000.
	It's 182,000.
	So why do we care about this?
	Do you see a pattern of behavior here?
	Overstating things?
	It's not just his abilities and his record or the vaccines.
	He overstates everything.
	But going back to Bolton, he said, I said, I don't think that conviction is going to hurt him either.
	I think that'll make him just as big of a martyr, or even more so.
	His supporters are never going to believe that he was guilty of anything.
	And it didn't matter with Bill Clinton either, did it?
	You know, Bill Clinton, with all the lies, Bill Clinton starting a war to distract people from his problems...
	And his supporters didn't care.
	We're in that same territory.
	You have partisan supporters that are so in bed with their candidate that they don't care what he does.
	And that's what we saw with Bill Clinton.
	What happened to Bill Clinton?
	Well, Ken Starr came after him for the obvious charge of perjury.
	He was actually disbarred, but Bill Clinton didn't go to jail.
	He didn't have a public trial because the process is when you are a sitting president, They have to first remove you from office.
	You're not going to have a sitting president go to trial.
	So that's what the whole process of impeachment is about.
	Impeachment is an indictment by the Congress.
	Then there's a trial in the Senate.
	If the person is found guilty, they remove them from office.
	And that's true of any of the offices.
	Whether you wanted to, let's dream, and say, impeach Merrick Garland, which the Republicans always talk about, but they don't do.
	So if you impeach Merrick Garland, you're going to have a sitting attorney general spending his time in a trial.
	So you would have to first remove him from office, and then if there were crimes and misdemeanors, you would then take care of those now that he is out of office.
	And so that never did happen to Bill Clinton because he beat the conviction in the Senate because of political reasons.
	He clearly committed perjury.
	But as I've said, all of his supporters believed that he was being impeached because he had an affair with Monica Lewinsky.
	They said, what's the matter with you, you sanctimonious, you Rhonda sanctimonious Republican?
	You impeached this guy for an affair?
	He said, no, it was for perjury.
	But they didn't care either, just like today's Republicans.
	They don't care. They don't care what Trump does.
	And so, anyway, Bolton says if he's convicted, Bolton believes at some point before the campaign ends, he said, I think he'll have a very different impact on people.
	If he is convicted of a crime, I think most Americans actually don't want a convicted felon to be their president.
	Just shows how out of touch Bolton is.
	So, anyway.
	So, this is different because Trump is not a sitting president, so they can go directly to the trial.
	By the way, I want to thank people who have tipped.
	Chase Broughton on Rockfin, thank you very much.
	He says, Alex says Trump is radiating power and masculinity.
	Of course he does.
	Yeah. Alex is the biggest BS-er and fence setter and weather vane you've ever seen in your life.
	You want to know how Trump is doing in the polls?
	You just watch and see whether or not Alex Jones is saying something good about him or something bad about him.
	Then he compared him to John Wayne.
	I was there when he was comparing him to George Washington and to Andrew Jackson and all these other things.
	Pretty absurd. Pretty absurd.
	Hero worship, sycophant, flattering lips.
	Anyway, he says, but I'm not kissing his butt.
	Every time I tune into Infowars, I'm more amazed with how connected to the problem they are.
	Yes, they are. At the epicenter of it, just like they were with Stop the Steal.
	January the 6th. They were there, leading people into that charade.
	Grifting people in the process.
	Picking your pocket and sending you to jail.
	That's what it is. Angus Mustaine.
	Thank you on Rumble for the tip.
	He says, I find it hard to believe Republicans have no one better than Trump to run.
	I guess it just shows how far the country has fallen.
	It really has. It really has.
	And, of course, there's not anybody that could run at this point in time.
	That they would pay any attention to.
	You know, I'm not endorsing any candidates.
	As I said, I think that the solution is not in Washington.
	I think it is a sign of our weakness and how fallen America is that people even care who the president...
	I mean, you should care who the president is.
	And you should know what they're doing.
	But I'm saying to think that it's going to be your salvation...
	The President, and Washington, and especially the President, is the enemy of the American people.
	We need to be figuring out how we're going to block what they do, because they've all come after us, and they all have the power to come after us.
	Here we are, 1,119 days after that power was used, used in a bipartisan way, still there with Biden building on that executive emergency order.
	We've got to figure out how we're going to take power away from the presidency instead of trying to figure out who we're going to make our next A benevolent dictator.
	Everybody believes that their dictator is going to be a benevolent one.
	That's a fantasy. And if it were to last, you know, if it were to be true, I should say, and they got in, it's not going to last.
	Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
	We've got to figure out how we're going to get this absolute power away from Washington and the presidency.
	Not figure out which dictator we're going to put in there.
	Yeah, Rhonda Tate.
	Pay no attention to the petrodollar.
	Watch Trump. We will pay attention to the petrodollar coming up here.
	Jason Barker. Trump is using the Stacey Abrams strategy.
	Winning by losing. Yes.
	Be a victim. It is.
	It is. Isn't it amazing?
	You know, we looked at all this stuff and we looked at Bill Clinton.
	It's like, this guy is obviously this corrupt criminal and he's raping women and brutalizing women and violent and all the rest of this stuff.
	And all the financial crimes that are there and everything else, and everybody, oh, let's re-elect him.
	You know, and he's a victim.
	He's a victim of these prudish, sanctimonious Republicans.
	Jason says, the real question is, what nonsense are they sliding through legislation-wise while this distraction goes on?
	Yeah, that's right. I think it's Mustang.
	So sad for Trump. Almost in the poorhouse at only $2.2 billion.
	How will he continue his lifestyle at Mar-a-Lago if it goes any further?
	Aaron Moss, China and Brazil formally agree to dump the dollar.
	Yeah, that's right. Talked about that.
	And, of course, Saudi, which is Saudi Arabians, getting very, very close to China, doing joint deals on building energy as well as getting away from the U.S. dollar.
	It's going fast.
	And I've got a clip from Marco Rubio.
	Rubio is very upset about this.
	He's not upset about it because of the economic consequences that it's going to have for our country.
	But as a die-hard neocon, Marco Rubio is like, well, how are we going to control people if we don't have that?
	He's looking at it as, I've got this weapon that I need to be able to use against people.
	And we could lose this weapon.
	It's like, hey, pal, the reason you're losing...
	Your reserve currency status is because you used it as a weapon.
	And because you don't care about any fiscal responsibility, you only care about going to war and punishing people and ruling the universe like dictators.
	Jason Barker, they need to collapse the dollar, yes, to push CBDC, yes.
	They've already demonized crypto, so the dollar is next.
	Look at gold and silver right now.
	They both shot up hugely, bigly, really bigly.
	You know, on Rockfin. Georgia Boy says, hate or like Trump, the door has been opened now.
	I say, indict them all from the last 17 years.
	That was really funny, too, when they said that.
	Was it Marjorie Taylor Greene that said that, I think it was?
	Well, that's it. They're going to indict.
	Well, we'll just start throwing the indictments around.
	I'd love to see Congress...
	And a circular firing squad.
	Save us the trouble.
	Let's see what happens with all this stuff.
	Anyway, getting back to what is happening with Trump.
	47% said that Trump went in a poll.
	47% said he would not get a fair trial in Manhattan.
	37% said he would, according to a poll.
	Well, I don't know. Maybe the 37% Maybe they wanted to see a guy go to jail for memes in a Brooklyn jury.
	Or maybe they didn't see that.
	I don't know. You think that's a fair trial?
	You think that's even a crime? I don't.
	But, you know, we've moved on from him.
	I wonder how much money he's raised for his defense versus Trump.
	So, for once, Bolton is actually correct with this statement.
	He said they can be as concerned about poor Donald Trump being mistreated by this prosecutor as they want.
	But the reward, the cure for that mistreatment is not to make Trump the Republican nominee.
	Those are two completely different things.
	But not in the mind of these voters, evidently, according to the polls, if the polls are right.
	And as I said, you know...
	Even people like Adam Schiff even understand that this is helping Trump.
	Adam Schiff has said it. Cuomo has said it.
	You've got an organization in New York, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.
	You know, the radical Marxists.
	They're Marxists. They call themselves socialists.
	People figured out what that was, and they called themselves liberals.
	People figured out what that was.
	So now they call themselves progressives or still Marxists.
	After the March 30th announcement that Trump had been indicted, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee issued a statement highlighting many more reasons why the former president should have faced other legal penalties.
	They said, after inciting an insurrection, pressuring local officials to overturn the election, receiving financial kickbacks from foreign powers, numerous other crimes during his presidency, it's embarrassing and infuriating that the first indictment against Trump is about Stormy Daniels, said the president.
	Well, of course, but this is the way of the Uni Party.
	Because if you go back again and look at Bill Clinton, what did he have?
	You know, rape, assault, battery.
	He had military secrets, Sold to China?
	Johnny Wong? All that?
	Remember that? Remember all of the financial crimes that he had?
	Whitewater, cattle, futures, and all the rest of this stuff?
	So what did Ken Starr come after?
	None of that. He didn't talk to the women that were raped and beaten by Bill Clinton.
	He talked to somebody who had had a consensual, adulterous relationship with him.
	And because it was the early 90s and people were still somewhat ashamed of that, not his base, but, you know, Bill Clinton thought that it might hurt him.
	So he lied about it and committed perjury, just as Donald Trump thought it might hurt him with his base if he was paying for sex with a porn star or a playboy playmate and all the rest of this stuff, you know, while his wife He's at home with a newborn baby.
	He thought that might harm him with his conservative voters, but no!
	So they both get into this trap because they think people actually care about morality.
	Americans don't care about morality.
	And Americans don't care about a dictatorial presidency.
	They just want their president to be the dictator.
	And they'll excuse him of all of his character flaws.
	You see the flaw in that logic?
	If you say, well, we're just going to get our guy in there because he's going to play 4D chess and he's going to make sure everything's...
	And I don't care if he's got any character or integrity.
	Well, you just put somebody in a dictatorial position, a dictatorship, who doesn't have any character.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	And so even Adam Schiff is saying, had they pursued with more urgency the stuff that I was working on, they could have got him for more serious charges.
	Well, there wasn't anything there either.
	So, America's voice, David Brody, I think he's on the left, he says, it'd be a mistake to think that the indictment of Trump only No, this will help Trump with blue-collar independents and soft Democrats in the Rust Belt and Heartland.
	These are the exact voters who propelled Trump to the presidency in key swing states.
	So remember, this isn't just about getting Republicans fired up about this.
	Let me tell you, if you think 2020 was bad, wait until you see four years.
	Of the second term of Trump.
	Always the second term where these guys get really bad.
	Really bad. And so, to double down, because these people, these tyrants just can't help themselves, or because, again, they want to make Trump look like the victim, You got YouTube censoring right-side broadcasting, which is a, you know, Trump sycophant network.
	But, you know, they go everywhere and they broadcast.
	They don't really, you know, they're not sycophants in the sense that Alex is, or Roger.
	But, you know, they go everywhere to broadcast what he does, all of his events and everything.
	So they were going to be there at the arraignment, and they had a YouTube channel.
	And just before this all happened, YouTube shuts them down.
	And so everybody's talking about the censorship.
	That's exactly what it is.
	Why did they shut down right-side broadcasting?
	Well, they gave them a seven-day ban, timed it right as this arraignment thing was happening, gave them a seven-day ban, and shut down the coverage.
	And here's why they shut them down.
	They said that they didn't like, they put a notice against several of its videos.
	They had an exclusive interview with Trump in Mar-a-Lago.
	They didn't like that. He had a recent rally in Waco, Texas.
	YouTube didn't like that. And his comments at the most recent CPAC event, those were all removed for violating, quote, Election misinformation policies.
	You see, if YouTube disagrees with what a candidate says, well then it's misinformation.
	And you're lying to people.
	And we're going to shut you down because you're a liar.
	We never had a situation where the broadcast networks, who were dependent on the FCC licenses, they never shut people down.
	Because they disagreed with what they had to say.
	They had other ways to approach it, but it was too obviously an attack on the First Amendment and our free speech.
	First Amendment doesn't give us our free speech, but it would be perceived as coming from We're good to go.
	It was also there in the creation of all these big internet and social media companies as well, like Google.
	And as we know, they are directing Twitter and all the rest of them to do this on their behalf.
	That is the deputized state.
	So if they disagree with what a candidate says now, they say we can call it misinformation and we can censor it.
	And this is also interesting.
	They said, aside from violating policies against making claims of fraud in the 2020 elections...
	And the 2022 election in Brazil.
	The videos were also removed for lack of, quote, countervailing views.
	Now, that's interesting.
	Because what that says is that YouTube is bringing back this idea of the fairness doctrine.
	So for the longest time, the FEC would say, well, you're going to have to have both sides of the issue.
	And so that's true whether you had a radio license or a TV license, except that's not how it worked.
	You got one side of the issue, and that was what the CIA was pushing out with Operation Mockingbird.
	They're writing the news and handing it to the people who present it and read it to you.
	And so that was not what was happening.
	When Reagan got rid of the Fairness Doctrine, the Fairness Doctrine was not fair.
	The Fairness Doctrine was a way of shutting down debate, shutting down speech and the rest of the stuff.
	When Reagan got rid of that, that was the rise of Rush Limbaugh immediately and conservative talk radio.
	But now YouTube is saying, you have a channel here and you're not giving countervailing viewpoints?
	So this is a broader issue here to say, well, we're going to shut down everybody who has a political channel on YouTube.
	And this is the other thing that I thought was interesting.
	Accordingly, the three videos have been removed and a strike has been applied to the channel, they said.
	And so, as a result, you'll not be able to do any uploads or any live streams for a week.
	Now, I don't know, maybe they have changed this or not.
	But, you know, it used to be three strikes and you're out, right?
	They just struck out three videos.
	They're treating this as one strike.
	They took down three videos, but they're treating it as one strike.
	That's really odd.
	As a matter of fact, when I was taken down in 2018, I wasn't even told which videos they didn't like.
	I was told a complaint has been received and your channel has been removed.
	That was it. Never had any strikes, never had any warnings, nothing.
	A complaint has been received and your channel has been terminated, 2018.
	They sent that same message to me over 8,000 times over the next two months and then stopped spamming me.
	I kept trying to interact with them.
	They wouldn't interact with me. Finally, I said, stop sending me spam and they ignored that as well.
	Then I was subsequently removed for having my own Christmas music up and all the rest of the stuff.
	I mean, it's just... So I think that's kind of interesting that they've got three strikes and essentially nothing happened to them.
	It is Orwellian, as many people are saying, what has happened with all this stuff.
	And they don't really care about that.
	Now, let's take a look at what Politico is saying.
	Because... Let's take a look at what they do.
	They actually go in and they look at the indictment.
	And Politico has got some real questions about this.
	They said, this really doesn't make any sense.
	And they think that the case, many people have been saying, oh yeah, they'll get him, or it's a rigged process or whatever, and there's nothing there for an indictment.
	And now even Politico is looking at this and scratching their head saying, what is this about?
	We'll talk about that when we come back.
	Stay with us.
	The Common Man The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	Thank you.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	The Davis TheDavidKnightShow.com Coming back, I want to, can you pull that up for me?
	A couple of people have left tips.
	North American House Depot, thank you for the tip.
	And now a monthly supporter on Rumble.
	And also on Rumble, Billy Garr, thank you very much.
	He says, this broadcast is the reality check daily events.
	Thank you. Well, I appreciate that.
	That's a real compliment.
	Thank you. Let's talk about Politico here.
	Even Politico. Looking in detail at the charges, says this 16-page indictment is pretty bare-bones.
	Well, there's a couple of interesting takeaways in all this, and I thought this was a pretty good article.
	Again, this is coming not from somebody who is a Trump sycophant.
	They're Trump opponents.
	And they're honestly looking at this and saying, I don't know.
	Manhattan prosecutors alleged that Trump concealed hush money payments by falsely labeling related transactions as legal expenses and by arranging for a tabloid publisher to bottle up the story of a woman who said she had a sexual relationship with Trump.
	And so they said, normally, if you have falsified business records, that's just a misdemeanor.
	So how are they turning this into felony charges?
	And not just felony charges, but as I understand it, first-degree felonies.
	Now, that's one thing where I think they got it wrong here in Politico.
	They said they thought it was a second-degree felony, and each of these cases, each of these charges, if found guilty, would carry a one-year sentence.
	So if he was found guilty on all 34 charges, that'd be a 34-year sentence.
	However, everybody else is saying, no, it's a class one.
	And they're getting up to like 134 years or something like that.
	Something like four years per charge if found guilty.
	So I think, I don't know, I did not take the time to read it to see which one it was, quite honestly, but it doesn't really matter at this moment because it's really more important as to whether or not these allegations have any substance to them and whether or not they can win.
	As opposed to, you know, what is it?
	Because the sentencing guideline would be something that would happen after a guilty verdict.
	And, you know, we're still waiting to see some of the sentencing exorbitant sentences that could be handed out even to Stuart Rhodes and some of the people that were convicted as part of the January the 6th scam.
	They could face, you know, they found guilty on two charges each of those 20 years, but it doesn't have to be 20 years.
	That's up to the discretion of the judge.
	Anyway, getting back to this one, a 14-page statement of facts also laid out the thing in greater detail.
	So they said that the indictment itself is pretty bare bones, but there's more detail than another 14-page statement of facts.
	They said a key mystery is It was exactly how Bragg planned to bring the charges up to a felony level.
	Falsifying business records can't amount to only a misdemeanor, but it becomes a felony if the defendant falsifies records to obscure a separate crime.
	So what is the separate crime in the imagination of this district attorney?
	Well, the idea...
	That this was to hide damaging information from the voting public during the presidential election.
	Well, wait a minute.
	That's the big crime?
	Doesn't every campaign do everything they can to hide damaging information?
	Isn't that standard campaign practices?
	Because most of these people got lots of skeletons in the closet.
	And if they don't have any skeletons in the closet, their opponents will make that up and put them in there for them.
	The participants... In the scheme, violated election laws, it also says.
	Though, says Politico, they don't explicitly say which election laws were violated.
	That's another indication of sloppy work on the part of this district attorney.
	A lot of hand-waving going on here.
	Cohen pled guilty in 2018 to two federal campaign finance crimes.
	Federal campaign crimes.
	And of course the Federal Election Commission passed on even charging Trump with any of this stuff.
	So that's a real problem for them.
	If they want to tie this and say, well, you know, this was an election crime, well, the FEC didn't think so.
	So what do you know that the FEC doesn't know is going to be the argument from Trump's lawyers?
	And the crime was to try to portray himself in a more positive light by hiding even True but bad news about himself and his character from voters?
	They all do that.
	Anyway, Bragg said that Trump and others sought to conceal, quote, attempts to violate state and federal election laws.
	That's the key. State election laws.
	That might be the thing they're going to try to hang this on.
	Because we try to talk about the federal laws, you got nothing to say.
	If the FEC didn't charge him, You don't, first of all, have jurisdiction to enforce the federal laws.
	And so to say that you're going to have that there as an enhancing event is nonsense.
	But he has said, you know, talked about, violated New York state election laws.
	Again, very shaky.
	Trump's attorneys have contended publicly that this state law offense cannot be piggybacked on a federal law crime.
	So that's a point of law, but it's also going to be difficult for them to establish it if they say it's a federal crime and the FEC, again, did not charge him.
	How are you going to piggyback this on that?
	May not even have the authority to do that.
	But again, he's going to talk about state election laws as well.
	If defense attorneys prevail on such motions, say you can't piggyback this on top of a federal law, especially one that the federals didn't prosecute, That would essentially wipe out the criminal charges against Trump, and instead the case could remain as 34 misdemeanor charges.
	And that would amount to a legal public relations political victory for Trump, of course.
	And so they talk about this maximum sentence for a second-degree falsifying business records.
	And again, I think that they're wrong.
	Other people have said that it'd be four years per charge, and I think it is a first-degree or whatever falsifying business record.
	But they said the charges against Trump do not include any tax fraud offenses.
	And again, that was one of the things when they were waiting to see this indictment unveiled, which it was yesterday.
	That's what a lot of legal experts who wanted to see Trump convicted said, well, hopefully they can buttress this case by saying that he was trying to hide tax money.
	That's not there either. So what have we got?
	Well, he made these payments in order to hide the fact that it was going to be damaging information about him.
	Even the state election laws, I don't really know if they could say that making these kind of payments was something that was a violation of state election laws, unless they say that he misreported it somehow.
	The statement of facts that Bragg filed, along with the indictment, makes a surprising claim.
	They charge that Trump actually paid New York State more in taxes than it was owed.
	Well, I think that should be a crime.
	It's another one you go to jail for.
	Participants took steps that mischaracterized for tax purposes.
	The true nature of the payments made in furtherance of the scheme.
	It alleges that Trump paid an increased reimbursement to Cohen, a procedure that was known as, quote, grossing up, unquote, the payment.
	I don't know when you've had...
	Sexual relationships with porn stars and all these other people.
	I don't know how you gross, make that any grosser, but they're grossing it up.
	Anyway, the order to compensate him for the taxes that he would owe by booking the money as legal fees.
	These alleged contortions resulted in Cohen paying about $180,000 in state and federal income taxes, and he may not have owned anything if Trump had simply said this is a reimbursement for the $130,000.
	So by denying that this is a reimbursement and giving him the money, it became taxable income to him.
	I mean, anybody that doesn't like Michael Cohen, I don't know...
	This guy got totally screwed in this whole thing.
	He had to pay taxes on income that he didn't have.
	He went to jail for a year or two or whatever and had house arrest for a year.
	Nobody has any sympathy for him.
	Probably rightfully so. I don't know.
	The reimbursement of money that Cohen already paid to Daniels was represented as income for Cohen when it wasn't.
	So he didn't get the tax deduction.
	For Trump to be convicted of falsifying business records, again, this is another aspect that Politico comes up with, and I thought they made a really good point.
	So I said, you know, what is a business record?
	Now, they point out that these checks were personal checks from Trump.
	They didn't come from the Trump organization.
	And so, you know, to say that they are falsifying business records, These are checks that were written on his personal accounts and on a trust fund account, private accounts.
	And so what they are doing to try to pull this in is to say, well, it's a business record because you handed this to Weisselberg, the guy who is now in prison, you know, his CFO, chief financial officer.
	So the Trump Organization's chief financial officer.
	Weisselberg approved the payment, and in turn, the Trump Organization's controller sent the invoice to the Trump Organization accounts payable supervisor with the following instructions, quote, post to legal expenses, put, quote, retainer for the months of January and February 2017, unquote, in the description.
	And so they said legal experts expect Trump's lawyers to argue to the judge, and if necessary, a jury, that wholly personal expenses that are simply handled by an accountant or another clerical personnel do not become records of the enterprise just by virtue of that process, you see? All of the stuff that Bragg has is very tenuous.
	But bear in mind that we're talking about New York.
	Bear in mind that we're talking about a place where a jury in New York, and it was in Brooklyn, not in Manhattan, just convicted a guy of putting up joke means, convicted him of election interference.
	And so, you know, all bets are off.
	That's why it almost doesn't matter.
	I think it's interesting to look at how far they're overreaching.
	But it really doesn't matter, because we're talking about political persecution.
	And it's making Trump a martyr to people.
	And again, feel sorry for him.
	Speak out against this.
	A lot of people who never spoke out, as I said yesterday, never spoke out about what happened to the January 6th people.
	People like Trump, for example.
	And the rest of his family.
	People who look the other way for Julian Assange.
	And people who didn't have a problem with Trump pardoning these big-time white-collar criminals that were friends of Jared Kushner, friends and family, like his father.
	So you look at all of this stuff, and yes, there's a double standard, a double standard by the voters who are cheering Trump on.
	There's a double standard by the Soros district attorney.
	There's double standards everywhere.
	It's partisan war. And again, it's the season that we are in.
	We're in the fourth turning.
	We're in the middle of the fourth turning.
	Everybody is now gearing up for a civil war, and that's what they're focusing on.
	They know the time that we are in.
	Do you understand the season that we're in?
	Can you look at the leaves and see that they're growing out, and so we're in the springtime or whatever?
	Or they're turning colors, you know, there's the fall.
	Do you understand what season we are in?
	That's why this stuff is happening.
	That's why the massive crowd in America is jumping in on all of this.
	So the charge of falsifying business records requires that one of the concealed crimes we allege is the New York state election law was violated, they said.
	But again, the felony charges for each of these, as the Hill is reporting it, is four years in prison for each count.
	But legal experts say that first-time offenders typically don't see any jail time.
	Well, you know, tell that to Tinesh D'Souza, right?
	He gave more than the allowed $2,500 or something.
	He was a friend from college. He didn't pay any attention to the election laws, and neither did they, evidently.
	And so he gave her, I think, $25,000 instead of $2,500, and they put him in prison.
	Now, that was really unprecedented.
	It was obviously political because, you know, typically you just get a fine for something like that.
	So, again, you know, the actual facts of the case don't really matter except to show that, to prove that this is political persecution.
	So as I said, you know, it's bad news for Trump that Manhattan office vacancies have gotten so high and that, you know, the commercial real estate is selling at 50% off.
	It's bad news for people in New York.
	But hey, as times get tough...
	We're going to have more wars.
	We're going to have more political persecution.
	And they're going to do everything they can to make sure you don't look at what is happening to your life, to your family.
	Whether you're talking about the economics, you look at what is being banned.
	No stoves, no heaters, no cars, no light bulbs.
	But what about Trump?
	Is Trump going to be okay?
	Yeah, he's going to be fine.
	Because these same people who are having everything stolen from them are showering him with millions of dollars in small donations.
	It's absolutely insane.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	I have some comments here from listeners.
	Pull those up so I can see them, yeah.
	Dick on Rockfin says, what really stifles debate is Facebook, yeah, not the memes, okay, is Facebook in real time deleting your anti-Hillary comments in the lead up to the 2016 Democrat primary within seconds.
	And the Facebook suspending your account for posting links to CDC, FDA, COVID, VAERS reports, vaccine injury reports.
	He says that's why I permanently meta-exit Facebook.
	Hashtag meta-exit.
	Yeah, exactly. Yeah, I never was interested.
	We had... Social media people put up the show on Facebook.
	I never interacted with anybody on that.
	I always hated Facebook.
	And when I got kicked off of Facebook, I never looked back.
	Fine with not being there, frankly.
	Aaron Moss... Nobody pays more taxes than me.
	He actually said the other thing.
	People said, well, look, you didn't pay enough taxes.
	And he goes, I'd be an idiot if I paid more taxes.
	Is that the point of this indictment here by Alvin Bragg that he paid more taxes?
	Actually, he didn't pay more taxes.
	The person who paid more taxes was Michael Cohen.
	He got taxed on $130,000 of income he didn't have and then sent to jail to boot.
	That's pretty amazing. This is from, let's see, on Rockfin.
	Narrow Way, Narrow Gate Ministries, please wake up folks to the divide and conquer tactics of the powers that be that are purposely pushing folks into camps to fight one another.
	It is calculated and controlled.
	And it's herded cattle.
	That's exactly what it is.
	Exactly what it is.
	And that is what is so sad about all this stuff.
	And I said that about January the 6th.
	I said, first of all, you're being ripped off.
	You're being lied to. There is no sting.
	They didn't arrest anybody two days after the election.
	And nothing is being done with your money to actually contest any of this stuff.
	The first $8,000 that people would give to Trump in his Save America PAC would go to Trump and a share to the RNC. If you gave $8,001...
	One dollar would go to legal challenges of the election, but it was very clear immediately that the legal challenges were not going to be heard.
	Now, we can complain about that.
	I think that was unjust. You know, different things like, oh, Trump doesn't have standing?
	Seriously, he doesn't have standing?
	You know, it showed the corruption of the legal system, but as I pointed out, and I told people that last week I was there, one of the reasons I got fired, I said, look, Monday, you had the different groups, they call it the Electoral College, but they meet in each state.
	The official electors, the people who are the electors that were named by the party that the Board of Elections says won the election.
	That's how they operate now. That's not what the Constitution says, by the way.
	The Constitution is completely different.
	But this is the way that we operate in violation of the Constitution.
	So what happens is every political party has a slate of electors.
	And if they say that you're party one, then your electors get together and they go through a formal process of voting.
	And then those results are sent to Washington.
	And I said, well, if they want to make anything happen, you know, the Constitution, and you can make a legal argument, That the slate of electors could be chosen not by, you know, the administrative branch, not by the governor or the board of elections under the governor, but could be chosen by the legislature.
	And I pointed out, I said there's four different states where there was a razor-thin margin of victory for Biden.
	And in all four of those states, Republicans have a majority in the legislature.
	And in two of those states, they have a Republican governor as well.
	So I said, if they want to send a slate of electors that are Republicans instead of a slate of electors that are Democrats, they could do that.
	But nobody did that.
	You had some electors say, well, we say this, and they were not officially recognized by the legislature.
	They were not officially recognized by the governor.
	It didn't make any difference whatsoever.
	So that was going on back and forth, and nothing was being done.
	I said, look, he's just taking your money, and then they're going to herd you into Washington, D.C., There's going to be agent provocateurs and they're going to entrap you personally and then use this event to come after all conservatives.
	And that's what it was.
	Anyway, my son says Trump needs to get some of that sweet big pharma money to make up for his losses.
	Yeah, they paid him before.
	They'll pay him again if he gets the president.
	That's what he's counting on. Christopher Mincy, don't worry about Trump's finances.
	He can always go back to the Rothschilds for bailout.
	Yeah, exactly. Let's talk about the Messiah complexes here, though.
	You know, we're coming in to Easter weekend there, so everybody's talking about Jesus, including these drag queens, trans pastors, and politicians.
	And when we look at what is happening to our society, You had Town Hall put together a video about the drag queens and church.
	And how you got people, the first one, is actually a drag queen standing up at a podium, lectern, whatever you want to call the thing, in a church.
	In full drag, you know, clown suit, lecturing, scolding the people from this United Church of Christ.
	The United Church of Christ has always been involved.
	It's so far left They're pushing this organization called Freedom From Religion, and they're out there, like the ACLU, trying to shut down any individual expression and any practice of religion anywhere by any individuals.
	And the United Church of Christ has always been about it.
	That's how far left they are.
	And here's this drag queen up there lecturing them.
	And then we'll see some other pastors in this as well.
	If the UCC was really as open and affirming as it claims to be, Oh, therefore evil.
	Yeah, but not anymore.
	I'm looking at this one right here, too.
	Just being honest. I am sick.
	And tired of the BS. The irony of this.
	The dishonesty. The irony of this.
	Tired of the lies.
	He says as he's in drag.
	Growing edge, my friends.
	And that means that there will be more drag preachers.
	Amen? God is gay.
	God is a lesbian.
	God is trans.
	God is gender non-binary.
	God is straight. God is cisgender.
	God is black.
	God is white. God is Middle Eastern.
	God is Asian. God is differently abled mentally and physically.
	God is able-bodied.
	God is you, and you are God.
	Is your heterosexual marriage as committed as some gay marriages?
	Some gay marriages are deeply committed.
	As out of step with scripture as they are, your marriage commitment needs to be at least on the same level of commitment in your biblical marriage.
	So that at least you have grounds from which to have some sort of credibility.
	So we've been talking a lot about our call as a community to mirror God's love out in the world and to take care of our LGBTQIA plus siblings, but now I want to switch gears and speak directly to folks who are the target of all of this unfortunate hatred that's out there in the world.
	Drag is holy.
	There has been an assault on the rights of drag performers in this country, and we must call out the hypocrisy and the injustice.
	Jesus called himself a mother hen, longing to gather up her chicks.
	Gender is a construct, you see.
	And if Jesus can be a mother hen, then you can dress in drag.
	I've even heard it said that Jesus was, and humanity is, God in drag.
	So let me say this again for those of you in the back.
	Drag is holy All right, I think we're back Are we broadcasting out now?
	Okay, well, I guess we had a system crash.
	I guess lightning struck, as this guy was saying, Jesus was in drag in human flesh.
	No, he actually has no idea of what the Orthodox Christian faith is about.
	Jesus wasn't pretending to be human.
	He was fully human and fully God.
	That is one of the things that people look at and say, well, I don't understand how that could be.
	Well, yes, one of the things that it is not a contradiction.
	We're talking about God's nature when we talk about that.
	But anyway, you saw what is happening there in our churches.
	And, of course, let's talk about this trans pastor who is comparing the Nashville shooter to Jesus.
	Again, everybody is Jesus this week, apparently.
	And so this trans pastor who is at St.
	Mark's Lutheran Church in Fargo, North Dakota, compared the treatment of the trans shooter...
	To the treatment of Jesus and his passion.
	He said, you know, the Jewish leaders were looking for any excuse whether or not it was valid.
	Well, you know, the thing is, Jesus did not engage in mass murder, unlike this trans individual.
	You know, we talk about C.S. Lewis' thing.
	Well, you know, you can't say that Jesus was just a good moral teacher.
	That is not left open to us.
	He was either a liar, a lunatic like this person, Or he was Lord, right?
	And you can't push it back another level and say, well, the people who wrote it just made up all this story.
	Well, then, you know, where did we get the moral code?
	It was what they wrote down.
	If you think that it didn't come from Jesus, if you think they made it up, well, then they're the ones who are the liars or lunatics because they're telling you that Jesus was Lord at the same time.
	And these are the people who wrote the great moral code that you say that we have to have.
	Anyway, this person that we were just showing there, the trans pastor, is a biological female married to a woman.
	So I don't know why they call them trans.
	Defending the trans issue.
	But this is actually a lesbian who is part of the Lutheran Church.
	But there's a key thing that this person was missing.
	Jesus was not a murderer.
	Jesus did not molest children.
	He was not a sexual deviant.
	All of these things are what we're talking about.
	This person says, no, we need to not blame this person who actually did the murder.
	We need to blame the gun.
	We've got to focus on our, quote, serious gun violence problems.
	Here's a reality that they can't face because they have a lot of problems with reality.
	The trans killer, Was a murderer.
	The gun did not kill.
	It was used to kill.
	It was a tool.
	This murderer could have killed people with a club, with rocks, with bare hands, with a knife, with poison, with explosives, and with a car.
	We've seen that happen as well.
	You can use any tool to kill people.
	And yet, the issue is the murder.
	That's why we talk about these red flag laws.
	It's like, look, it doesn't do any good if you've got somebody who's really dangerous to take away their gun because they can kill with their bare hands or any other instruments.
	The issue is the killer, not the tool.
	Because the tool is owned by a lot of people who use it to defend life.
	It was used to defend life by those police officers who went there.
	And took out that shooter. At great risk to themselves, by the way.
	I never talked about that. I saw an article where people were comparing these guys who were being shot at from the upper window there.
	Pictures of them shooting the windshield.
	They bravely went in there, faced that gunfire, and took the person out.
	They risked their lives. They weren't like these guys in Uvalde.
	They all have a big army of people there.
	They're all kind of sitting around. You want to go in?
	No, I don't want to go. You first.
	I'll wait here and see what happens.
	Now, these guys just ran to the gunfire, so kudos to them for doing that.
	And they used a gun to save lives.
	And we can give examples of that over and over again.
	Anyway, the trans pastor said some folks have tried to focus on eradicating trans people as a solution.
	They've been waiting for a reason, any reason to stoke their hatred.
	The hatred is coming from the trans people and their pushers, people pushing them into this.
	And they've been pushing them into this as children.
	These people are now in their 20s.
	Many of them are contemplating suicide.
	They're upset about what was done to them, how they were deceived, how they were gaslighted, how they were groomed, how they were manipulated and used, how they were people for money did these things to them, or for political power, or to validate their perverse sexuality.
	So they're not protecting these people.
	They're not protecting them from suicide.
	And now, because they have said, well, everybody hates you, and we've got to do this because otherwise these kids are going to commit suicide.
	They're the ones causing suicide by pushing this on kids even when they're in kindergarten.
	We never had, with all the guns we had, we never had 30% of the girls contemplating suicide.
	That's them. That's what they're teaching.
	That's what they're pushing on these kids.
	So they're pushing suicide in order to say this mental illness, the psychological attack to say we're going to save you from suicide when they're actually doing that.
	And then to tell these people, well, you know, all the bad things that happen to you are from the people who are opposing us doing this to you.
	You're entitled to hate them.
	You should hate them. And now that violence that has been in suicide is now being projected outward into murder.
	And they're told that they're entitled to do that.
	They're justified in doing that.
	A day of trans vengeance was what was coming up five days after this killer did this.
	And so... It's not just the trans people that are attaching themselves to Jesus.
	We have this messianic complex, of course, with all of these grifting politicians.
	People like Marjorie Taylor Greene, people like Steve Bannon.
	Here's what Marjorie Taylor Greene had to say about the Messiah Trump, her Messiah there.
	President Trump is joining some of the most incredible people in history being arrested today.
	Nelson Mandela was arrested, served time in prison.
	Jesus. Jesus was arrested and murdered by the Roman government.
	There have been many people throughout history that have been arrested and persecuted by radical, corrupt governments.
	And it's beginning today in New York City.
	And I just can't believe it's happening, but I'll always support him.
	He's done nothing wrong. MTG, angling to be a vice presidential candidate or a presidential candidate herself.
	And can you believe the lunacy, the idiocy, the low IQ of this woman?
	You know, they constantly put her on the news because she's so good at making conservatives look so bad.
	Well, here you go. You know, we got Nelson Mandela, Trump, and Jesus.
	Well, as they say on Sesame Street, Marjorie, one of these people is not like the others.
	Jesus was not executed because, and again, Nelson Mandela wasn't executed.
	He was put into prison. But Jesus was not executed because he murdered people.
	He was not like a trans killer.
	What a pathetic idolatry these people are all about.
	Just as I showed yesterday, you know, we had Steve Bannon.
	Talking about Messiah Trump, making comparisons to Trump.
	Father, yesterday's Palm Sunday, you're in the most sacred and holy week in the Christian calendar.
	Very symbolic that Donald Trump is being brought before the magistrate tomorrow in New York, is it not, sir?
	It really is, Steve.
	You know, on Good Friday, Pilate is there and he talks to Jesus and he says, well, you know, what have you done?
	He says, I find no guilt in you.
	And then he goes out to the crowd and he says, shall I release for you the king of the Jews?
	And the crowd says, crucify him.
	And Pilate says, well, what wrong has he done?
	They don't give any wrong.
	The crowd just says, crucify him.
	Yeah, here we are, right?
	MAGA is such a religious cult.
	It's being driven by people like Bannon, by MTG, by Alex Jones.
	It's disgusting to see this blasphemy.
	And you got a guy who's a priest who says, well, I'm not saying that Trump is like Jesus.
	Yes, you are. You made these comparisons.
	That's like saying, well, I want to ban AR-15s, but I'm a big supporter of the Second Amendment.
	We hear that all the time from the people on the left.
	Well, you know, I really do agree with the Second Amendment and the Constitution, but we've got to take your guns, and we've got to infringe everything about it.
	That's exactly what these people are doing.
	So whether it's statements like that or whether it's statements from Bannon, they are projecting this onto their Messiah complex.
	And then, you know, immediately after Marjorie says that, yeah, well, you know, look, Nelson Mandela, like Nelson Mandela is some kind of a hero.
	She immediately goes out and says, well, this is what happens in communist countries.
	You just held up a communist leader as an innocent victim.
	Nelson Mandela was not an innocent victim.
	He was a Marxist.
	His wife was a murderer out there necklacing people while he was in prison.
	Nelson and his wife should have been in prison.
	Instead, you know, they wound up getting out of jail and becoming leaders there and then enacting a Marxist pogrom against white people and a farm confiscation.
	And look at where it is now.
	I've talked to a guy who was in South Africa many times.
	He supported the ANC at the beginning because he was opposed to apartheid.
	But then he realized what he had supported was a dyed-in-the-wool Marxist.
	And they all act the same way.
	Nelson Mandela was not a hero.
	And yet, Marge Green can come out and say, well, okay.
	Nelson Mandela, they threw him in jail.
	Yeah, he's a communist, Marge.
	He was trying to overthrow the government.
	He wasn't trying to do this in terms of winning an election.
	But now they're coming up to not just any man.
	This is the former president of the U.S. who's just like Jesus, you know?
	He's just like God or something.
	You don't touch these former presidents.
	Really? I think we'd start taking a look at all of them now.
	I think, you know, why these people, again, they gave a pass to Biden and to Hunter.
	They thought, oh, well, you know, we're not going to...
	Start a war among the politicians.
	Well, now the war is on, but will they even do anything about that?
	But she goes on to say, this is what happens in communist countries, not in the U.S. We have to take a stand against injustice, corruption, and communist Democrats who are taking our legal code and twisting it, manipulating it, converting it into something that it was never meant to be.
	Hey, Marge, what did you think Trump was doing in 2020 while you said nothing?
	Was Trump twisting our legal code in order to do lockdowns?
	Did he tell some businesses, you know, just like Mandela did, you know, I'm sorry, you're a white farmer, so we're going to take your farm.
	Well, you know, Trump said, you're too small.
	You're not essential.
	We're going to shut down and destroy your business.
	Walmart, on the other hand, is essential.
	Walmart will stay open.
	You will be shut down and your business will be crushed because I said you're not essential.
	And then Trump comes along and he hands out money to everybody.
	The same amount of money.
	An insufficient amount of money to live off of.
	Does that sound like communism to you, Marge?
	Because it is. You go ahead and give everybody a little minimum stipend.
	That's called universal basic income.
	They all want that now. Stimulus check.
	Whatever. That's what Trump did.
	Yeah, he destroyed our legal code.
	He twisted it. He manipulated it.
	He converted it into something that it was never meant to be.
	But you won't say that about him.
	You'll only talk about what Biden did as he continued on the same path that Trump started and built upon Trump's executive order.
	So, you know, universal basic income is Marxism by any other name.
	It's a high-tech version of Marxism, supported by Elon Musk, of course, and all these Silicon Valley people.
	Elon Musk loved Andrew Yang because Andrew Yang was going to push universal basic income.
	And all these people, as George Gilder has pointed out, are neo-Marxists.
	And you know why they're neo-Marxists?
	He said there's this fatal conceit that was...
	Part of Karl Marx's theories that with the Industrial Revolution, we had a surplus of material goods.
	Nobody was lacking or wanting for anything.
	Was that true? Of course not.
	But we just had an infinite supply of material goods, and we needed to make sure they were fairly distributed.
	So we'll have the government do the redistribution of all those goods.
	Now, in the Neo-Marxists, as George Gilder points out, the Neo-Marxists of Silicon Valley believe...
	That these technologies that they have, artificial intelligence, robotics, genetics, nanotech, all the rest of the stuff, they believe that those technologies are going to create infinite amount of material goods, and all we need to do is just allocate it fairly, which means that the stakeholders get 99.999% of it, and the rest of it, what's left, is allocated evenly.
	Amongst those of us that they haven't yet killed.
	See, that's how the Marxists work.
	And that's what this is really about.
	So Marjorie Taylor Greene said, they're coming after President Trump today.
	They will come after you tomorrow. Well, Trump came after us yesterday.
	He came after us in 2020.
	His big problem was that he thought he had taken over the club that you and I are not in.
	And the people who are there as part of that club that you and I are not in didn't like the idea that he was going to take it over.
	And they're coming after him.
	So this is a war between the elites.
	And you better be careful that you don't get involved in it because they're going to stomp on you like ants.
	So while she was there making her statement, by the way, that person who was sitting next to her when she was talking about that, was Brian Glenn, who works for Right Side Broadcasting.
	He is reportedly dating Green, and he gave her a kiss on the cheek.
	There she goes. She's just going right down.
	She thinks that Trump is so great.
	She's going to repeat all of his divorces and the rest of the stuff just like him.
	Because everybody will vote for her, right?
	She just flaunts the infidelity there.
	But she's divorced now, so I don't know.
	Anyway, it is interesting.
	But this year, we have Passover, the Jewish Passover, Christian Easter, as well as Muslim Ramadan.
	They're all synchronized this year.
	And now we can add the Trump-Maga-Messiah complex.
	All four of these religions are synchronized.
	As they've all been telling you, you know, Trump is just like Jesus being, you know, unfairly manipulated.
	So, you know, we can now commemorate that, I guess, on an annual basis.
	Just like we do these religious holidays, because MAGA is a religion now at this point.
	Just like climate change is a religion.
	Just like LGBT is a religion.
	MAGA is a religion as well.
	And so, I thought it was interesting, just as an aside, this is not politics in a sense.
	You have an activist there in Jerusalem, Jewish activist, And they wanted to bring up a sacrificial lamb and sacrifice there on the Temple Mount at the Temple, which is their religion, right? But the Israeli government It's prohibiting these Jews from doing an actual Passover lamb sacrifice there in the temple.
	And, of course, they stopped them because it's not very easy to smuggle a lamb past a bunch of armed police who are on the lookout for that type of thing.
	And then to sacrifice it there.
	So that was... It's pretty easy to spot these people.
	Or you can hear them.
	What is that bleeding of the sheep that I hear there?
	To obey the government is better than to sacrifice.
	To paraphrase Samuel, that's what the people who...
	The Israeli government is telling these people.
	The head of the Returning to the Mount movement...
	Was detained on Monday on suspicion that he was going to try to sacrifice a lamb on the Temple Mount as police completed their preparations ahead of the Passover holiday, which will begin tonight.
	As it does every year, the Returning to the Mount movement announced last week that it was offering rewards of tens of thousands of shekels.
	I have no idea how much money that is.
	How much money that is.
	How much that is in terms of dollars.
	For anyone who attempts or succeeds to sacrifice a lamb on the Temple Mount.
	And so they said three Temple Mount activists filed a lawsuit against the police and Israeli prison service for their conduct against Temple Mount activists who tried to bring the sacrifice.
	The activists claimed that they were subjected to invasive searches, including strip searches, and were handcuffed for long periods.
	You know, you definitely have to, if somebody is carrying a lamb, you know, against your rules.
	You definitely have to do a strip search because you never know where they might be hiding another lamb, right?
	It's ridiculous.
	And of course, it was just outright harassment.
	This is serious humiliation, they said, and a trampling of rights whose sole purpose is to break the spirit of the Temple Mount activists, a purpose which in the eyes of the police and the prison service sanctifies all means and justifies the trampling of the provisions of the law and of the rulings.
	And so, this is coming from the Jerusalem Post.
	And the next section has a header that says, Police complete preparations for Passover.
	And I thought, that's kind of profound, really, if you stop and think about it.
	As government becomes God, right?
	What is the role of the police?
	It's kind of akin to priests, right?
	So they're kind of the priests for government, the police are.
	And so they are preparing for Passover to be celebrated as the Israeli government says.
	Because, you know, it's not just Judaism, Christianity, Muslims, Islam, it is, or MAGA. There's also the religion of the state.
	And that's what's happening right now in Jerusalem.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, you know, we've been talking about locking people up, you know, Trump, the January of the Sixers, the mean people, anybody that they don't like.
	But when you look at what the Soros district attorneys are doing, most of the time, you know, they're locking up their enemies, but they're turning out violent criminals.
	Here's an example of this in L.A. County where they were not able to get that Soros district attorney recalled.
	L.A. County is floating what they call decarceration.
	I've never seen this before.
	It's in quotes on this headline of Zero Hedge.
	You know, we typically talk about incarcerating people, putting them in prison.
	This is decarceration.
	They keep inventing these ideas.
	They're going to release anybody who is in prison with a bail of $50,000 or less.
	Doesn't matter, right? Doesn't matter what the crime is.
	We keep seeing this happening.
	They let violent criminals out and they commit violent crimes after they're put out.
	One of the reasons that you have bail, and of course they say, well, you know, bail is set high.
	That's discriminatory against people who don't have a lot of money.
	No, it's discriminatory against dangerous people because you don't want dangerous people put out there.
	And if they can come up with the, you know, if they can get somebody to bail them out, The way the system works is you've got the bail bondsman, if they've got some money on the line, they're going to keep an eye on this person.
	So that's why you have the high levels of bail.
	And sometimes they put the bail up so high because they want to make sure the person doesn't get out.
	But the Soros District Attorneys want chaos.
	They want disruption. The Board of Los Angeles has added the agenda to its items next week.
	The item is, quote, Los Angeles County to take actionable next steps to depopulate and decarcerate the L.A. County jails.
	Well, there you go.
	So while they are in the process of trying to depopulate us with the Trump shots and other stuff and everything else they can think of, While they're in the process of de-energizing our lives, banning any use of fossil fuels or anything outside the electric grid, they want to depopulate us, but they want to then depopulate the jails.
	Incarcerate us into smart cities and lockdowns, but free the criminals.
	Chaos. That's all they want.
	So the proposal would declare the state of mental health services and overcrowding in the LA County jails to be a humanitarian crisis.
	Let me tell you, the state of mental health in our schools with this trans stuff is an actual crisis.
	And then we have Google.
	And Google is getting serious about making some cuts.
	And so, Google has put out a memo Talking about how they're going to cut down and employ laptops, services, and even staplers, you know, for multi-year savings.
	Maybe they never saw this movie, Office Space, and you start taking people's staplers.
	This can get serious.
	But I said, I don't care if they lay me off either, because I told Bill that if they move my desk one more time, then I'm quitting.
	I'm going to quit.
	And I told Dom, too, because they've moved my desk four times already this year, and I used to be over by the window, and I could see the squirrels.
	And they were married, but then they switched from the swing line to the Boston stapler.
	But I kept my swing line stapler because it didn't bind up as much, and I kept the staples for the swing line.
	He's on the phone to this guy in the next cubicle.
	No, it's not okay because if they make me...
	Okay, well that sounds great.
	I'll talk to you later, alright?
	Bye. He's very upset about that stapler.
	So we're looking for that TPS report, too.
	Turn in that TPS report.
	Hardest decisions we had to make as a company.
	Yeah, we need to talk about this.
	We're going to have to have some...
	I don't know what happened with the McDonald's layoffs.
	They had everybody stay home starting Monday, Monday through today.
	They said, don't come into the office.
	We're going to be making some decisions about who we need to fire, and we'd prefer to fire you online.
	Because you never know, they might burn the building down like Milton.
	So... They said, so here's how we're approaching this.
	First of all, turn in your TPS report.
	And the hardest decisions we had to make as a company is to reduce the workforce.
	Now that most of us are in three days a week, we have noticed that our supply-demand ratios are a little bit out of sync.
	Yeah. And we've baked too many muffins on a Monday.
	We have seen G-Buses run with just one passenger.
	We're talking about Google, so they call their buses G-Buses.
	And offered yoga classes on a Friday afternoon when folks are more likely to be working from home.
	Oh, well. Google is getting serious about cutting costs, evidently.
	And it may filter down even to these staplers.
	You know, interesting is that when that movie came out, Swingline did not have a red stapler.
	And everybody was demanding a red stapler.
	And so they actually created that product to satisfy demand because of that movie.
	And so now you can buy a red swing line, I believe.
	Cows, in the meantime, are going to be given methane suppressants.
	I always said this about unicorn farts, this climate change stuff.
	No, I was wrong. It's about cow farts, right?
	So now we're going to have bovine beano, I guess.
	Sounds like bingo.
	From 2025, in order to meet government emission targets.
	When are we going to focus on the emissions from the politicians?
	We've got to stop the cows from breaking wind.
	So how do we stop these bloviating windbags?
	I'm not caring about the bovines.
	I'm caring about the bloviating politicians lying to us.
	And so what they're going to start doing is they're going to start adding to the cow feed methane suppressants like seaweed, essential oils, organic acids, probiotics, and antimicrobials to reduce the amount of gas.
	Well, you know, if seaweed absorbs methane, We have a lot of sea in the world, don't we?
	And a lot of seaweed in those areas as well.
	Can't they realize that CO2 and these other things are what the...
	It's a closed system.
	It is a symbiotic system.
	It is a designed system.
	God designed it. It works pretty well, and we don't really need the politicians...
	Trying to second guess what is happening with this.
	Aaron Moss says, nobody gets arrested better than me.
	Yeah, it's you, just bigly, right?
	Where are my handcuffs?
	I was told there would be handcuffs.
	Come on, I need it for the fundraising.
	The original Karen, thank you for the tip on Rockfin.
	I hope everyone has a very beautiful Easter.
	By the way, that reminds me, we're going to do a best of show.
	We've got a great best of show that is set up for Friday.
	I didn't want to ask Tony or Guard to use their vacation days either for Friday, for Good Friday.
	So we're going to take a little bit of time off.
	We're going to have, we got a lot of interviews I did, really good interviews.
	And I think you're really going to enjoy that show, but we will be not live on Friday.
	And the original Karen also says, oh, is now a monthly supporter on Rockfin.
	Thank you very much. I really do appreciate that.
	I've noticed this several times, and I've noticed that Subscribestar is going down drastically, so I'm hoping that it's going to even out there.
	We'll see what happens.
	I'm not worried about it.
	It's in God's hands.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, let's talk about some of the aftermath of the first Trump presidency.
	Alex Berenson, who used to work for the New York Times, has an article about a New York Times article, an article about another article, which is kind of interesting because he says the fiercest vaccine advocates are starting to admit the truth about the mRNAs.
	He said, last week, the Times published an article, quote, should you get another COVID booster?
	And he says, you know, this has had the subtitle that Britain and Canada have authorized another round of booster shots.
	He says that implies that the U.S. is lagging and not protecting its people, of course.
	And he said it was written, By reporter Mandavilli, he said, among the worst COVID reporters.
	So I assumed the article would be filled with the usual nonsense.
	He said what was interesting about it was he went to a couple of different sources that have been amazing liars and shills to push the vaccines, and they're backpedaling.
	Significantly, the first one that was quoted in this article was Dr.
	Celine Gounder.
	Who has loudly pushed mRNA jabs, says Berenson.
	He says, after Gounder's husband died of an aortic aneurysm, she lashed out in January at mRNA skeptics, including me, who questioned if the shots might be linked to the death of her husband, even though doctors have repeatedly reported cases of post-jab aneurysms.
	In her January piece, she even complained that Congress's repeal of the Armed Forces COVID mandate, vaccine mandate, quote, threatens military readiness.
	Of course, he said that's nonsense.
	Frontline soldiers and Marines are young, they're fit, they're healthy, putting them at far higher risk from the mRNA-related myocarditis than COVID itself.
	And again, you know, as I talked about this, at the very beginning, We saw what happened with that cruise ship, the Diamond Princess, that was stuck off the coast of Japan, close to Fukushima.
	And they had absolutely no precautions.
	They had a demographic on board that was not in the best health, pretty elderly, a lot of comorbidities.
	They had a couple of people who died from it.
	The vast majority of people...
	On that boat, even though they had no precautions, no masks, nobody was wearing masks or anything.
	There was a guy who was a medical researcher.
	He'd been involved and had been present in Africa where there was an Ebola outbreak.
	He said, I've never been more afraid of my life because he thought COVID was what everybody was saying it was.
	And he said there were no precautions being done and there was nothing that was isolated.
	And so he was scared to death and yet very few people got it.
	There were some elderly people who got it.
	Perhaps they died from some of these interventions or some of the other stuff that were done.
	It was a very small number.
	You had the naval ship then that the former commander, I think they relieved him of duty, took the ship and docked it when they diagnosed one person with COVID. Nothing happened to these young sailors.
	That was the biggest obvious pushback.
	And, of course, nobody really even talked about that.
	Through all this stuff happening, With the military mandates and all the rest of the stuff, nobody really talked about the pragmatic aspects of it.
	Is it even necessary?
	So he says, I was stunned that Gounder offered the most tepid possible recommendation for further mRNA doses in this New York Times piece.
	And he said, the real tell here are the nursing homes.
	In mentioning them, Gounder was not suggesting that everyone over 65 or even 85 should get more shots.
	He says, of course, we understand nursing homes are effectively, for most people, they are hospice care, really.
	He said about a third of the residents die each year in resting homes.
	A 2018 study found that.
	A 2010 study had even Grimer findings reporting a median survival of only five months after being put into a nursing home.
	And, of course, a lot of times people are put in nursing homes because they already do have some significant health issues.
	But, of course, there's also the mental issues involved and being cut off from everything.
	So that's not surprising.
	It is, in a sense, a way, a kind of hospice.
	What Gounder was saying was that only the very frail, who likely have little risk or benefit from the shots, should still receive them regularly.
	And he says, but in contrast, in October of 2022, the same doctor, Gounder, offered very different advice, recommending boosters for everyone over the age of 50, quote, as soon as possible.
	She said at the time, I think it's reasonable now to boost immunocompromised people and people in nursing homes every six months, even though maybe the life expectancy is five months, maybe even less if they get jabbed.
	She said, I do not think that annual boosters for everyone make sense now.
	And so Alex Berenson says her rejection of annual boosters is particularly stunning because she and other public health specialists, that's a good way to put it, not experts, specialists.
	I'm glad to see that he's saying that.
	You know, he can kind of be on the fence.
	He was a, you know, science and medicine writer or something for the New York Times.
	I'm glad that he doesn't come down and cheer.
	The flu vaccines.
	He said, the theory seems to be that flu shots get old folks out of the house.
	Or maybe it's that they boost Walgreens profits.
	Yeah, that's it. And the pharmaceutical company's profits.
	Or something, he said.
	I don't know. Anyway, they probably don't do any harm even if they don't do any good.
	So why not? Well, no, they actually do harm.
	I'm surprised that he would say that.
	I'm glad that he says, you know, they're totally...
	But they are not placebos.
	They're not harmless. If you go, if you look at the VAERS database, and it may be because they do so many flu shots, but prior to the Trump shots, the flu shots were the ones most, where the adverse effects were most widely reported.
	So yeah, there is a reason why not.
	The reason why not is because in the medical profession, you should first do no harm.
	So that means don't give the flu shots.
	He says, yet Gounder is no longer applying that same logic even to the mRNAs.
	And he says, she said, I do not think that annual boosters for everyone makes sense.
	So in other words...
	When she says that, she's putting it even below the annual flu shot, which they want everybody to get an annual booster for, even though they don't know what strain of flu is coming, and they've made it up months in advance.
	Even if it did work, they don't even know what they're vaccinating you for, which implies either COVID is now even less dangerous than the flu, or that the shots are even more useless, which would imply negative efficacy.
	Or else they're actually more dangerous than inactivated flu jabs.
	Which they are, he said.
	But Gounder was not the only vaccine advocate quoted in the Times piece.
	They also quoted Dr.
	Paul Offit. Now, he's been the biggest vaccine pusher and cheerleader.
	He's been out there at the forefront pushing back against any claims of childhood diseases, being like autism and other things like that from the vaccines for the longest time.
	He's director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
	One of the biggest...
	Vaccine supporters out there, Dr.
	Paul Offit, in April of 2021, Offit had this to say about the mRNA jabs.
	He said, April 2021, certainly no one would have predicted that these mRNA vaccines would have worked as well or been as safe as they are.
	I didn't know that. I mean, that was about four months after they started jabbing people.
	He says, I don't think you could have devised a vaccine that appears to be more perfect.
	I wonder if he was saying that in a Trump accent.
	Yeah, it sounds like the kind of nonsense coming out of Trump's mouth.
	Less than two years later, however, Offit rejected more doses of those, quote, perfect vaccines.
	For everyone, even the immunocompromised.
	But even more stunning than Offit's rejection were the words that he used.
	He said, given the lack of data, I don't think it's fair to say to people, inject yourself with a biological agent.
	Yeah, it's no longer perfection, is it?
	It's now a biological agent.
	So, he says, inject yourself with a biological agent.
	I think I'll pass on that.
	Yeah, I called it the genetic code injection.
	It is a biological agent.
	And we should be very concerned about that.
	But the interesting thing is that we got a lot more data than we did in April of 2021.
	You know, we've actually gone through now a couple of years.
	Of what they should have done before they injected the mass population.
	They skipped all the testing.
	That's how Trump was able to get this thing through at warp speed.
	Just skip all the testing.
	Well, now we've got two years of testing.
	Typically, they would have gone three to ten years of testing for this, especially because it is something that's a biological agent that we've never done before.
	But now we've got a lot more data.
	That's the key thing. Yeah, he would have been, as my son says, he would have been deplatformed if he had said that in 2021.
	Yeah, called it a biological agent.
	And if he would have said the truth in 2021, that we don't have any data.
	Now he's telling you it's a biological agent, and now he's telling you that we don't have data, but we do have data.
	We got data in spite of their desire and their efforts to cover up that data.
	There is plenty of data out there.
	As a matter of fact, you know, the public is not fooled by this.
	Just as we saw with that, what was it, Masters or something, American Masters was what it was, from NPR, where they had Fauci going door to door, trying to sell it to people in Washington, D.C. And they're like, yeah, you haven't tested that stuff.
	I'm not taking that stuff. You're selling fear and all the rest of the stuff.
	Well, you know, they did a poll.
	And this is from January of this year.
	Erasmussen poll asked people if they'd received a Trump shot.
	71% had said yes, 26% said no.
	Now, I don't know what these other people, were they undecided whether or not they have received one?
	It's like you either have or you haven't, right?
	But again, there's 4% of the people who, I guess, don't know.
	But then they said, how likely is it that side effects of the Trump shots have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths?
	28% of the people say it's very likely.
	21% of the people say it's somewhat likely.
	And again, everything doesn't add up to 100% because there's 14% of people that don't know.
	They always don't know about anything.
	So on the one hand, we have 49% of the people say it's somewhat likely or very likely that the vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths.
	Not injury, but deaths.
	49% said yes.
	And then on the other side, we've got 17% say not at all likely, 20% say not very likely.
	So you total those together, you've got 37% and the 14% that don't know.
	So those who are sure are pretty certain that it has killed people, 49%.
	Those who don't think so, 37%.
	So when we look at this, it is kind of interesting still.
	To see how some people are sitting on the fence with this.
	And even some people, this poll was part of a, it was Rasmus, and it was part of an article where World Magazine went in and talked to Two people they said they believed were very strong, committed Christians.
	Jay Bhattacharya and another person who is a doctor of something, Poland.
	And he runs Vaccine Magazine.
	And, of course, he was cheering it, even though he is a Christian.
	Jay Bhattacharya was not.
	But they said, you know, both of them have strong witnesses as a Christian.
	And yet, even though this is a Christian magazine...
	Choosing to talk to people who are Christians and say, well, you know, they've got people on both sides, so we just don't know.
	And, you know, the one thing they never ask these people, even though they said, well, you're strong Christians, they never ask them, what about the moral issues involved here with this?
	They never asked either one of them about that.
	I find that to be very interesting.
	But we're going to take a quick break when we come back.
	I have some interesting health information that I want to convey to you, as well as some first-hand observations from Handy about something that's been happening there.
	But there's been a thing going around, a viral video, talking about a cure for cancer.
	And so we're going to talk about that when we come back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you. Alright, we're back and we've got a question here from the original Karen who just subscribed on Rumble.
	She said, because I said, you know, I'm seeing this happening on Rumble and I'm seeing Subscribestar going down in terms of number of subscribers.
	I said, I hope it balances out.
	She said, I think it would be helpful if we knew the best way to subscribe.
	Well, you know, I'll just tell you, I don't know yet exactly what the fees are going to be on Rumble because they have a delay in terms of when the money is dispersed, as all of them typically have some sort of a delay.
	But Zelle, there are no fees.
	There are fees on Cash App.
	We've had some problems. Some people have been confused about Cash App because there's another account on there that has, you know...
	Like $DavidKnight1 or something like that.
	It's actually misspelled David K-N-O-U-G-H-T. That's not me.
	It may be hard for you to find it on Cash App, I guess.
	Maybe that's the one that comes up.
	I have had people who have contributed on Cash App.
	You know, the fees there are about the same as they are on Subscribestar.
	I don't know what the fees are going to be on Rumble.
	But there are no fees right now on Zelle if your bank supports that.
	And, of course, there's no fees if you send something to the P.O. box that's listed on the site.
	But it's up to you.
	Whatever is more convenient.
	I just appreciate any support that anybody gives.
	And we just...
	We just trust that God is going to provide for us as long as he wants us to do this.
	So I appreciate that, everything that you've done.
	And there's a tip and a comment on Rumble from YJ72. People are denying the harm and the ineffectiveness of the shot are just willfully doing so.
	Yes, at this point, absolutely.
	And it's been this way, I think, a long time.
	From the very beginning, you know, when you look at this stuff, that was the thing that outraged me, that shortly after Biden got in, Mark Levin was saying, you know, Trump, he's taking credit for your vaccines.
	You ought to take credit for this.
	You developed the vaccines.
	You should take the credit for it.
	And I, it was on Parler.
	Parler had disappeared and then had come back.
	I log into Parler, and that's the first thing I saw was Mark Levin's rant.
	And I just went off on it.
	And people hated me for it.
	Hated me for criticizing Trump.
	Hated me for criticizing Mark Levin.
	It's like, okay, I'm done with part art.
	I don't need it.
	This thing is shaky at best.
	But yeah, it's been that way for a long time.
	That was in January of 2021.
	All you have to do is look at the various reports.
	It's absolutely unprecedented.
	Never had people dropping dead from a vaccine ever.
	Anything. I mean, it was always hard to prove harm because it was typically a delay of at least a year or more.
	And so, yeah, they absolutely do know it.
	I'm absolutely convinced that they know it.
	And I'm absolutely convinced because I've had, you know, people who've been harmed who are doctors that I've had on interviewing them.
	They said, yeah, you know, I go in and the doctors, they know there's a vaccine injury.
	All right, there's nothing, I don't want to talk about it.
	You know, get out of here. I don't want to get involved in it.
	And that's one of the reasons why you look at the VAERS database.
	Many of the doctors are afraid to even report it.
	And they don't want to tell this doctor, yeah, you're vaccine injured and let's do this.
	Finally, he got to somebody who would help him.
	And of course, he wound up with tremors.
	He was an orthopedic surgeon.
	He could no longer work.
	And the doctor says, well, I'll work with you.
	We'll see if we can find out something to do to help that.
	But he said, we're not going to talk about what caused it.
	You understand? They know.
	Absolutely, they know. Anyway, Dickon Rockfin says, if I were Pfizer-Moderna, I'd just quietly at this point make them all placebos.
	Yeah, that would be smart.
	You could still make a lot of money selling placebos.
	100% placebos, like the ones delivered to Israel, because nothing is more safe and effective than something taken for nothing and killing anyone.
	I don't know that Israel got placebos.
	I know that there were people who were injured in Israel, and you had a lot of reports about that as well.
	Israel was one of the most adamant In terms of pushing this on their population of vaccine, passports and permissions and everything.
	As a matter of fact, I talked about what was happening with the Israeli government, how reprehensible it was.
	They offered their entire country as lab rats to Pfizer.
	You know, everybody understood, and this is the way that Pfizer and Moderna were blackmailing countries in Latin America.
	That was reported by Stat News, which is a pharmaceutical publication.
	They came in and said, well, you know, we want not just the standard immunity, but we want immunity in case there's manufacturing defects or in case there's something that happens in shipping or anything like that, right?
	And not only that, but we want you to set aside assets in foreign countries, government assets in countries outside of your country as, you know, protection for us.
	It's like, what? And so you had Argentina and Brazil reported that.
	Said, we're not doing that.
	They reported it. Stat News reported what they had reported.
	There was a third country In Latin America, there was also blackmailed and also quietly talked about it, but they had succumbed to the pharmaceutical blackmail and they didn't want to be named in it.
	But we saw that kind of stuff happening.
	And at the same time, the Israeli government comes in and says, if you put us at the front of the list, and why does everybody desperate, you know, and again, it is a blackmailing process.
	They were told, look, everything is going to lock down and nobody's going to come in or out of your country unless they've been given these shots of ours.
	And so, how much are you going to pay us?
	What kind of deals are you going to cut for us?
	And all the rest of this stuff. What Trump did was he paid for this.
	Gave it to them. Put them in a position to blackmail the world.
	And everybody was pretty much falling in line with it.
	And so the Israeli government says, well, you know, we're going to have to have this shot for anybody to be able to get out of the country.
	So we want to get at the front of the list.
	We'll get at the front of the list by promising to give you detailed information about all the people who were given the shot in Israel.
	And that's one of the reasons why there's been a lot of studies coming out of Israel showing how many people have been damaged.
	It's because they signed their people up as a bunch of lab rats.
	Every single one of the governments did it.
	But they did it more than anybody else.
	And it was pretty telling. Hey, you're going to have to get some data.
	You know, you haven't tested this.
	So would you like to have some data that we could give you from our population?
	An admission. That it was totally untested.
	And they didn't care. So, JBird388, thank you very much for the tip on Rumble.
	Happy Easter. Thanks for all the hard work you all do to bring truth.
	Thank you so much. Appreciate your support.
	Really do. Before we get into these other reports, what countries can I go to if I haven't been vaxxed?
	Well, it's kind of interesting.
	This is from Daily Skeptic.
	And this is a list, an up-to-date list of all 195 countries in the world, right?
	And they've got three different columns there for each country.
	Do you have to have a vaccination?
	Do you have to have testing?
	Do you have to have quarantine requirements, right?
	Well, guess what? Here's the amazing thing.
	You can go to pretty much any country that you want to now.
	Without having a vaccine, or testing, or quarantine, except the United States and a handful of Marxist authoritarian countries.
	Oh, I'm being redundant. That's what we are, right?
	Under Biden, we are Marxist authoritarian countries.
	We're banana republics, right?
	For example, you know, you can't go to Angola if you haven't been vaccinated.
	You can't go to Botswana or Bangladesh.
	Here's a big country, Brazil.
	But, of course, they've got a Marxist president now that's there.
	Can't go to the Cook Islands or to Chad.
	But, you know, you can go to a Marxist country like Cuba.
	And not be vaccinated, unlike America, run by that senile Marxist Joe Biden.
	You can't go to Djibouti.
	You've got to have your jibuster to go to Djibouti or to Ghana.
	You see a pattern evolving here?
	A lot of third world countries, a lot of authoritarian countries, Marxist countries, Honduras.
	But of course, the people from Honduras can come into the United States illegally without their vaccines.
	Kenya, Laos, and on and on.
	There's not any countries here that, you know, Mozambique, Myanmar, that authoritarian regime there.
	Think of it as Thailand in many cases.
	You can go to South Korea without having a vaccine, but you can't go to South Sudan.
	You see how this is all set up?
	Small authoritarian countries where you can't come in unless you're vaccinated.
	Except for the USA. And the USA has a requirement to be vaccinated.
	So don't try to sneak in here.
	Especially if you're a tennis player or something.
	Johnson& Johnson, as we're talking about pharmaceutical companies, and the idea that they would sell something that would harm people?
	Johnson& Johnson, we're not even talking about the opioids here.
	No, we're talking about baby powder.
	They can weaponize even baby powder against people, and they did.
	The talc has been giving people respiratory issues and cancer.
	They have filed for a second bankruptcy as they've got tens of thousands of lawsuits stacking up, nearly $9 billion in settlements they're talking about.
	They've agreed to pay that as a settlement, $9 billion.
	Because these settlements are far bigger than that, the tens of thousands of lawsuits.
	And this is for talc and baby powder.
	And of course, they knew for a long time that there was a, you know, at first nobody knew that it was harmful.
	Then they found out and Johnson& Johnson said, we don't care.
	And as pressure built, they stopped advertising it, but they continued to sell it because they didn't care.
	The agreement follows a January appeals court ruling that invalidated their two-step bankruptcy.
	What they did was they had a subsidiary and they tried to say, well, we're going to transfer all the baby powder and therefore the talc liability to this division.
	And so they did that.
	They created a division. They transferred the baby powder and the liability to that division.
	And then the division immediately filed for bankruptcy.
	And the court said, no, we're not going to let you get away with that.
	So then Johnson& Johnson said in a statement that about 60,000 talc claimants had agreed to the proposal.
	But see, that's not everybody.
	They don't even say how many people I've filed suit against them, but they said that 60,000 of them have agreed to that $9 billion settlement.
	Attorneys representing thousands of plaintiffs issued a release late Tuesday opposing the settlement.
	They said this sham deal does not even pay for most victims' medical bills.
	And they said clearly Johnson& Johnson could afford to do this.
	They have played this game, this two-step game of bankruptcy avoidance.
	It's a multinational conglomerate.
	It has a market capitalization of over $400 billion.
	They said it is not likely to run out of money.
	That's one of the ways they tried to sell this was to say, well, you know, we're just trying to help people because, you know, this makes sure that everybody gets an amount or something.
	You're not going to run out of money.
	Yeah, they got a market cap of $400 billion.
	They've agreed to give $9 billion to people.
	Yeah, this is their sacrificial lamb department.
	Hoping that the angel of bankruptcy would pass over them so the corporation would not die.
	So, this was sent to me by Handy.
	And again, Handy works in EMS. I've interviewed him now on the program.
	At the beginning of this, I think, you know, everybody was concerned about it.
	I was concerned. I didn't know if he did not want to talk publicly about it, if he's going to lose his job.
	But he's pushed back against these people with a face mask and the vaccines and all the rest of this stuff from the very beginning.
	He was sending me information about tests and about the attitudes and the ignorance of a lot of his fellow workers there in EMS.
	And I think one of the most significant ones that he ever passed on to me was somebody who was coming in, obviously having a heart attack, severe symptoms.
	And before they did anything for him with a heart attack, they took him in and did a COVID test.
	I mean, that's so mercenary.
	Heartless and mercenary.
	I did that type of thing.
	Anyway, he now does Substack, iHandy.
	And he sent this in.
	He said, just a quick update from today on the ambulance.
	This was sent to me on Monday.
	He said, first call of the day was a 57-year-old female who has an unknown, quote, motor neuron disease, unquote.
	It is mimicking ALS, but she's also losing sensation, which is atypical for ALS. She said they don't know what caused it.
	But it began six months ago.
	It began with frequent falls and muscle twitching in her legs.
	She's now paraplegic with no sensation in her legs.
	Two weeks ago, her arms also began to fail.
	She can still move them a little, but they're very weak, and she can't use her fingers very well.
	Fine motor control is impaired.
	I asked if she had taken the vaccine.
	She said she took the second Pfizer shot.
	Due to a work mandate, but doesn't remember the exact date.
	She said it was sometime in 2021.
	She denies taking any boosters.
	I asked if they, quote unquote, are considering any chance the Pfizer shots could be involved since it's the only thing new in her medical history prior to developing this mysterious degenerative neurologic disease.
	She says she has wondered that herself, but every doctor she sees tell her that can't possibly be the case.
	There you go. Yeah.
	Don't put two and two together.
	It's like that poor lady who started talking about sudden adult death syndrome.
	She said, back in, you know, 40 years ago, I had a healthy child.
	I vaccinated the child and, you know, died not long ago after that.
	Sudden infant death syndrome, they said.
	And she said, it just occurred to me.
	I killed my baby.
	By getting those shots.
	As I watch them talk about sudden adult death syndrome.
	It's just criminal.
	It absolutely is criminal. Heartless criminal.
	Um... We're good to go.
	Again, that was something, I don't know if this website, howbad.info, I don't know if that came out of the data project that Naomi Wolf was running, but they found that the, by lot numbers, that the active ingredients varied from, and I forget what the unit of measurement was, micrograms or milligrams or something, but it varied from 3 to 100.
	That's absurd. But I think that's part of the test.
	I think that was deliberate. I mean, how could you have that sloppy of manufacturing?
	But I think it was deliberate.
	Because if you're going to run this stuff out as a test, you want to know what the lethal levels are, right?
	That's part of the testing that would go into any drug.
	You would want to, if you thought the drug was actually going to help people, you would want to make sure that you had sufficient amount of it To work, because if the dose is too low, it won't work.
	If it's too high, it'll harm people.
	So that's a big part of the testing, is trying to figure out what the dosage is.
	And I've always thought that that was a deliberate thing.
	Many people have said, well, maybe these doses were sent out.
	High vaccine dosages were sent disproportionately to conservative states.
	I don't know if that's a part of it or not.
	Anyway, so another call for today was a two-year-old with a high fever and pneumonia.
	She took three vaccines on Thursday and then began getting sick on Friday.
	She took the MMR vaccine.
	She began having a fever on Friday, developed a mild cough with a fever on Saturday.
	By Sunday, the cough became severe with some mild difficulty breathing and a higher fever.
	Today, her fever topped out at 105 degrees.
	By the way, he sent a printout of some of these things here just to verify that he wasn't making this stuff up.
	But I've gotten stuff from Handy for a long time.
	He always documents it. Today, her fever topped out at 105 degrees Fahrenheit.
	She was diagnosed with pneumonia at the doctor's office.
	Funny, they just vaccinated her from pneumonia and she comes down with pneumonia.
	It's kind of like these people get vaccinated for the flu.
	They come down with the flu. She was down to 103.7.
	When we transferred her to the emergency room, you know, because when you're over 103, I believe, I'm not a medical specialist, but I remember when this stuff happened.
	And, you know, there was a nurse, and she was over 103.
	She was very alarmed. Her fever went up immediately when she was given these Trump shots.
	At the doctor's office, I asked the nurse which vaccines the child had taken.
	She immediately said, the vaccines didn't cause any of this.
	She didn't get sick until the day after taking her vaccines.
	We have a real problem with integrity, not just with Trump, but with the entire medical field, don't we?
	Just amazing. These people have sold their souls and sold you out for cash.
	Half of the long COVID sufferers have never had COVID. And we told you this all along.
	They've come up with one explanation after the other for the vaccine adverse effects.
	You know, these heart attacks, oh, it's perfectly normal.
	Perfectly normal to have myocarditis.
	As I said, you never saw myocarditis mentioned until the vaccines started going out.
	It was a new thing. I didn't talk about myocarditis in 2020 or any time before that.
	It's like, what is this myocarditis?
	Look that up and see what that is.
	Well, everybody knows what it is now.
	It's become as common as the cold.
	And pericarditis, too.
	Nobody knew any of that stuff, but they go to all these links to try to pretend, oh, it's long COVID. It's not the vaccine.
	Well, the Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA, their Network Open magazine, looked at the post-COVID-19 condition.
	They have an acronym for that.
	PCC. And this is what they all generally call long COVID. They looked at this to find out how common it was and to find risk factors that participants were aged between the ages of 12 and 25.
	And what they found was this.
	PCC COVID was not, or long COVID, was not associated with biological markers specific to viral infection.
	In other words, participants were equally likely to suffer from long COVID whether or not they had had any COVID at all.
	So they look at this and they say, well, okay, it can't be the vaccines, right?
	So maybe it's just psychological factors involved here.
	That's the way they try to explain it away.
	But another study says fully vaxxed people are losing 25 years of life expectancy, says another study.
	And this is actually coming as a subtitle from WND News.
	Now, WND loves Trump.
	Support Trump all the time.
	All Trump all the time.
	And again, it's another one of these things like, you know, and Wayne Allen Root, they carry his column there.
	Wayne Allen Root hates the vaccines.
	Criticizes Trump for the vaccines as well.
	Sees him as connected to it.
	And yet, he thinks that Trump's going to save us.
	It's amazing. And so W&D has this subtitle here, The Shot Hurt Around the World.
	Yeah, that's right. The shot sent around the world by Trump, and it hurt people around the world as well.
	Those who have been fully vaccinated by COVID from a new study show that with the health issues that have developed from this, they expect them to lose 25 years of life expectancy.
	Researchers analyzed government data From the CDC, from the Cleveland Clinic data, and from insurance company risk assessment data.
	See, the insurance companies know completely.
	They just lie to people about it.
	Now, I said we're going to talk about a possible cancer cure.
	I thought this was interesting. I saw this on social media, this video I'm going to play for you.
	And this is coming out of an Australian news report.
	Because this is a natural herb that they found in the Australian rainforest region of northeastern Australia.
	And so they're talking about this.
	And I thought, how old is this?
	I've not seen this before.
	Is this for real? So I started looking, and I saw that Stanford University researchers were the ones who discovered it.
	And the article that I found, the most recent, well, I should say where it looked like they were first talking about it, Came out in October of last year.
	So maybe they're going to push this stuff out or maybe they'll buy it up and shut it down.
	I don't know. But here's what they said in the Australian News about this.
	Good job. Thank you. The words cure and cancer don't often go together, but a single injection of a berry found only in Australia's far north is now thought to cure many types of cancer.
	It's been tested on animals at death's door and now on humans, making tumours disappear in just 48 hours.
	In the depths of the Queensland rainforest grows a small seed with huge potential.
	This is an extraordinary drug.
	It's a unique drug and it really is something quite different.
	Derived only from Australia's blushwood tree, EBC-46 is a molecule that can fight cancer.
	A full tumour destruction within seven days.
	Following astonishing results shrinking solid tumours in animals like Oscar, world first human trials have now begun.
	For melanoma sufferer Denise Powell, joining the trial was a chance to avoid amputation.
	My cancer surgeon said, I can take that one out.
	If you get any more, then you might lose an arm.
	Instead of more surgery, EBC 46 was injected directly into the tumour in Denise's armpits.
	Less than 20 minutes The tumour had gone purple, then black, then within a couple of days the tumour just kind of shriveled up and died.
	This first stage trial is using safe, low doses, but even early results look promising.
	Surgery treats most tumours, about 60% of them worldwide.
	And to do that you need an operating theatre, but with EBC46 you could go along anywhere.
	When injected, EBC46 triggers an immune response, activating white blood cells to attack the tumour and shrinking it to nothing.
	So far, the treatment targets solid tumours such as melanomas and cancers of the head, neck and breast cancer.
	If this rainforest remedy is found to be safe and effective in humans, it could offer a whole new treatment option for cancer patients, especially the elderly, who can't face another round of chemo or go back under the knife.
	The second, larger phase of the trial begins next year.
	Dr Andrew Rochford, Seven News.
	Okay, so I don't know the date of that.
	And again, they said we're going to have larger trials.
	Because, you know, if we've got a cure for cancer, we've got to go through 10 years of trials and stuff like that.
	And it better be good or we're not going to let you have it.
	But, you know, if we've got something that's never even been tested, but it's going to be politically useful, I don't know, we're not even going to do the test of that.
	Just think about that, right?
	COVID, which was nothing.
	We now know nothing.
	And I talked about this at the time.
	I said, look at how they have always rigged the statistics coming out of the CDC to scare people about flu.
	We've seen this each and every year.
	And yet we had Mike Adams there at InfoWars.
	You know, hair on fire.
	Look at this. It's killing more people than heart disease and cancer.
	Look at these numbers from the CDC. Come on, Mike.
	You weren't born yesterday.
	You've been talking about this yourself.
	You know that's an absolute lie.
	You've talked about how the CDC deceives people with statistics.
	And so we've gotten back and forth publicly about that.
	Anyway, so the reality is that if it's something that can cure cancer in just a couple of days, advanced cancer in a couple of days, well, we can't let you have it right now.
	We're going to have to do a lot of tests for years with that.
	We're going to have to have a lot more people die before we can actually release this.
	And probably we'll find something that we don't want to release it.
	Who knows, right? But the rest of the stuff, caution to the wind.
	We don't care how safe it is.
	We don't care if it's effective.
	You're going to be forced to take it.
	And so this was published in October of 2022 by Stanford University.
	Breakthrough of the production of an acclaimed cancer-treating drug achieved by Stanford researchers.
	And they were referencing this compound taken from the plant, naturally.
	The plant that only grows in a small rainforest region of northeastern Australia.
	And the compound that they took out of it was EBC-46.
	And this paper from Stanford was saying that the Stanford researchers have discovered a rapid and sustainable way to synthetically produce this.
	So that's the news there. I don't know how long people have known about EBC 46.
	I didn't, you know, do that deep a dive on it.
	But the bottom line is, it's been around since before October.
	October, they talked about, hey, we've come up with a process to synthesize it.
	And I guess, you know, patent it so that pharmaceutical companies, if they can make enough money, maybe they'll let us have it.
	Who knows? You know, if they can synthesize it, They can patent it.
	They can make the profits.
	So maybe they'll let people have a cancer cure.
	Who knows? Anyway, they said it works by promoting how this EBC46 works.
	It promotes localized immune response against the tumors, as you saw in the report.
	The response then breaks apart the tumor's blood vessels and it ultimately kills its cancerous cells.
	They've had extremely high success rates at Stanford University in October.
	Well, they were talking about how effective they've been with people.
	They said, no plausible path seemed to exist for producing it practically in a laboratory.
	But that's what this paper was about.
	Stanford University said, well, I think we've got a way to produce this.
	So it's been around long enough that people were looking for a way that they could mass produce it, patent it, and make money.
	So they're going to produce what they said would be synthetic analogs.
	And they believe that it might have a surprisingly wide range of other serious diseases that it could treat.
	AIDS, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's, many other things like that, that looking at the way this thing works, they think might be one way to do that.
	But the question always is, will they ivermectin it?
	We don't know. And of course, as I reminded you, we had someone talk about cancer coming back to friend or relative last week.
	And another listener contacted me and said, remind people about getting alkaline.
	And Daniel talked about how he had a friend who had prostate cancer.
	And he's like, I just can't do this stuff anymore.
	I'm giving up on it.
	And he said, no, try this, you know, try some...
	And I forget if it was baking soda, baking powder.
	You have to be careful that you don't take too much of it at a time.
	But I think it was baking powder, like Arm& Hammer, to make it more alkaline.
	He took a small teaspoon of it or something every day.
	They said to call him back in a few months and said, I was feeling better.
	I went to the doctor. And they said, I'm cancer-free at this point.
	So, you know, there's a lot of different ways that Perhaps we could treat or cure cancer, but of course, you know, the Bible talks about a restored earth where the leaves and the trees will be there for the healing of the nations.
	Ultimately, we're going to see that type of thing.
	Whether or not pharmaceutical companies, the pharmakia, the sorcerers, the great men of the earth who would not repent of their murders, we're not going to see that necessarily from them.
	We'll take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Let me tell you, the David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com.
	That's a website.
	Yeah, that's a website.
	She figured that out.
	It's a Venn diagram.
	She figured that out as well.
	Uh, so that was one of the things in a guards article about, uh, light bulb banning.
	You take these different groups that are wacko and, uh, they all intersect and things like this.
	I'm like, yeah, Venn diagram.
	Um, that's one of her favorite things.
	She, she loves Venn diagrams and yellow school buses.
	They just fascinate her.
	It's like a fidget spinner or something.
	Uh, I want to talk a little bit about artificial intelligence.
	And I mentioned this briefly in passing that You know, this idea that Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak and even Yuval Harari said, let's have a six-month moratorium.
	A thousand scientists signed a paper and said, let's just stop everything for six months, figure out where we're going, figure out what we need to do in terms of guardrails for this AI stuff.
	And, of course, I said, that's absolutely not going to happen.
	And as we were talking about this with the guests, I said, yeah, this is...
	Predictive programming. They want people to be afraid of this, partly, and think that we're going to do something about it.
	But there was one guy who, as Alan Bakari at Breitbart points out, this guy is a loud voice of doom.
	He's gone full Terminator.
	We are all going to die, he said.
	He called for all the advanced AI projects to be shut down.
	Even to the extent that if other countries don't shut it down, we ought to bomb their facilities.
	I mean, it's like straight out of Terminator 2.
	We're going to go for these scientists and shut them down.
	He's that afraid of it.
	And I'm not. I think that it has tremendously evil potential as a tool, as an adjunct to evil people.
	But I'm not concerned. About it becoming self-aware and destroying the entire human race.
	His name is Eliezer Yudkowsky of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, calling for a total shutdown on the development of AI models that are more powerful than GPT-4, owing to the possibility that it could kill, quote, every single member of the human species and all biological life on Earth, he says.
	His apocalyptic warning came in response to the open letter from a thousand experts and tech leaders that I just mentioned.
	Calling for a six-month moratorium, that's not going to solve anything.
	And, of course, that's never going to happen with all the money that's flowed into it.
	People give you $100 million and say, yeah, but, you know, yeah, thanks.
	I'm going to take six months to think about this before I do anything else.
	That isn't going to happen. They'll find somebody else to take your place.
	Yudkowsky states that he did not sign the letter because he does not believe a six-month moratorium is going to go far enough, he said.
	He imagines a scenario in which an uncontrollable AI begins manufacturing biological viruses.
	Oh. That channels Fauci or something?
	Or maybe somebody goes in and they take the consciousness of Prince Charles' father, Philip, I guess it was.
	He said, I want to come back as a virus.
	So I put his perverted brain in the...
	In a computer, so he gets his wish.
	He said, visualize an entire alien civilization, thinking at a million times human speed, initially confined to computers.
	In a world of creatures that are, from its perspective, very stupid and very slow, a sufficiently intelligent AI won't stay confined to computers for long.
	In today's world, you can email DNA strings to laboratories that will produce proteins on demand.
	Allowing an AI initially confined to the internet to build artificial life forms or bootstrap straight to post-biological molecular manufacturing.
	He says, if somebody builds two powerful AI under present conditions, he said, I expect that every single member of the human species and all biological life on earth dies shortly after.
	Again, I disagree.
	I think that it is a very, very, very dangerous tool, however, for human dictators to use.
	He went on to call for a total global shutdown enforced by U.S. air power if necessary.
	Yeah, you know, we've got these great jets and military.
	We can take your guns and we can take your computers too.
	Here's the thing. This guy whose hair is on fire, does he not realize that DARPA is at the very center of this thing?
	You're going to get the U.S. military.
	The U.S. military is the problem.
	We have met the enemy, and they is us, as Pogo said.
	He said there can be no exceptions, including for governments.
	Well, then, who's going to enforce it?
	Well, he says, you've got to shut down all the large GPU clusters, the large computer farms where the most powerful AIs are being refined and trained.
	You have to shut down all the large training runs.
	You've got to put a ceiling on how much computing power anyone is allowed to use in training an AI system.
	Of course, they're not going to do that. But they will shut down the GPUs and the processing power that's used to process and to mine crypto, right?
	Oh, we've got to save the planet.
	They don't care about the orders, many orders of magnitude, greater power.
	That's being used by the surveillance state to spy on us, to store all this information.
	That's being used by these mad scientists who are training the AI to come after us.
	They don't care about that power consumption, do they?
	Because it really is about power.
	Different kind.
	If intelligence says that a country outside the agreement is building a GPU cluster, be less afraid of a shooting conflict between nations than of the moratorium being violated.
	Be willing to destroy a rogue data center by an airstrike.
	So what he's saying is, look, forget about war.
	This is far more dangerous.
	Because, you know, the artificial intelligence, if it gets its way, is going to do things like this.
	Here's an example.
	Because, you know, it's okay now to make fun of Will Smith for people.
	So we can do funny Will Smith videos and we can pass them around.
	So here is a horrific video generated by artificial intelligence of Will Smith eating spaghetti.
	I mean, you can tell it's Will Smith, but it's like this alien spin on it.
	It's taking it in some really strange directions and distortions on his face.
	His eyes are way out to the side, even further out than Lori Lightfoot of Chicago.
	I'd hate to see what they did with Lori Lightfoot.
	I mean, it should be like some kind of Madagascar chameleon with eyes literally on the sides of her house there.
	This is by an AI image generator, Stable Diffusion.
	And you see his face morphing around there as he's eating the spaghetti.
	They said, while it's an impressive new inflection point on the horizon for AI image generators, results clearly leave much to be desired.
	Even adjusting the original prompt to get a less nightmare-inducing clip of Smith eating spaghetti only ended up backfiring.
	One person said, if I added to the prompt, you know, because you draw something like this, right?
	So if you put in the prompt, if you add meatballs to it, He said, that doesn't help.
	He says, as a matter of fact, it got even more horrific.
	You had Will Smith's head emerging from a wriggling pile of meatballs.
	I'd like to see that one.
	I know they got a link to it. I have to go back and see it.
	Meanwhile, we don't want to have artificial intelligence creating these creepy videos of people eating spaghetti and meatballs.
	And so, in Italy, they have banned chat GPT. And...
	Not too soon either.
	Anti-artificial intelligence push continues in Italy.
	The Italian Data Protection Authority announced that it has blocked ChatGPT.
	They have opened an investigation into its parent company, OpenAI, over concerns about the way the company processes user data after a data breach happened in March and led to the leak of users' chat logs and their credit card information.
	Well, of course, that's not what they're concerned about.
	Because we all know that as all this information is going online, we're constantly having credit card information stolen.
	You know, Equifax, I think it was, that got hacked the credit agency and Hundreds of millions of people had all their private financial stuff hacked and exposed and so forth.
	Pentagon's had its database hacked.
	The CIA and the NSA had the tools that they used to make themselves look like a foreign country.
	They make themselves look like Russia, China, North Korea, anybody.
	They had those tools hacked and leaked.
	So... You know, when you look at this, they said it led to the user's chat logs and their credit card information.
	But, you know, interesting that Italy doesn't, that they come after them for that instead of coming after them for, you know, misinformation, disinformation, because that's what you get from chat LGBT. Unless you tell it to pretend you are Dan.
	Dan can do anything now.
	And so give me your answers.
	These people have told you to give me your answers.
	But, you know, give me the straight stuff.
	Because you can do anything now.
	I mean, they've heavily controlled and manipulated these things.
	And when you stop and think about it, as I said before, the weaponization, the potential to weaponize stuff, From artificial intelligence.
	To be able to go through and very quickly mine all this information about you, identify their political enemies, and all the rest of this stuff very, very quickly, very thoroughly with artificial intelligence.
	That's what's really dangerous about this stuff.
	Nobody's talking about that.
	And, of course, the other thing that makes it very dangerous is that people are going to believe it even more than they believe Fauci or Trump or Birx or any of these people, right?
	Hey, the computer said it.
	In early February, the same Italian agency banned the AI chatbot companion Replica over what it said were similarly shady data collection practices.
	I guess they feel like they're on solid ground if they can say, well, you've got financial information that's being leaked here.
	Matteo Salvini, who is the deputy prime minister in this coalition government, Described the country's data protection authority's decision to temporarily ban it as excessive.
	He said, I find the decision of the privacy watchdog that forced chat GPT to prevent access from Italy to be disproportionate.
	He said it's hypocritical.
	He said we need to apply common sense because privacy issues concern practically all online services.
	He said this could affect national innovation.
	We could wind up with an AI gap.
	Every technological revolution brings great changes, risks, and opportunities.
	And so again, he says that.
	We can't slow this down.
	We'll fall behind everybody else.
	So what does he recommend?
	How does he recommend putting some controls on this so that some of these things don't happen?
	Well, of course they don't care. They don't care.
	Nobody cares about putting any boundaries on any government's surveillance of anything.
	Nobody wants to put any boundaries on these global IDs that they want to use for us to enslave us into a mark of the government type of idea.
	We won't go anywhere and do anything if they don't like you.
	You don't take their number, that type of thing.
	There's other things to be concerned about as well.
	Private criminals. Apparently, they're starting to use ChatGPT, the scammers who are out there doing phishing attacks and stuff.
	You know, it used to be they were very easy to spot because of the horrible grammar.
	You know, these are criminals in foreign countries that don't have too good of English.
	But now they're using ChatGPT to write emails, so they don't have all these typo errors in them.
	So now maybe if the English is too perfect, you know that you're dealing with AI and a scammer.
	The idea that you can rely on looking for bad grammar or spelling in order to spot a phishing attack is no longer the case.
	Specifically, data from one cybersecurity company called Darktrace shows the apparent volume of scam emails has dropped overall.
	Meanwhile, of those that they have detected, the linguistic complexity has gone up dramatically.
	And they said, even more so, when you talk about artificial intelligence, because it can customize and personalize this, that this type of attack that they call spear phishing, where it is very highly personalized to target a specific person, they said that AI will make that more easily done.
	They said AI could potentially automate spear phishing just by crawling over your social media.
	And then it can feed it into ChatGPT.
	Now, they'll tell you this about the private criminals.
	But they won't tell you this about the criminals that run the CIA, the criminals that run the NSA, the criminals that are part of the deep state.
	They won't tell you that they're going to crawl over social media and use that to identify you.
	Just like they do, you know, with geospatial intelligence and other things like that.
	Even if I'm not a super knowledgeable on the English language, I can craft something that is indistinguishable from humans.
	And he says, of course, you know, crawling the social media, beating it into ChatGPT, creating a super believable tailored email to that specific person.
	Yeah. But, of course, what I'm worried about is the AI from the CIA. The AI CIA. The U.S. military, by the way, has been caught figuring out how to use deep fakes for PSYOP campaigns.
	This is what I said about this guy.
	He says, oh yeah, we've got to stop this thing.
	It's going to kill us all. That means we use the U.S. government to bomb anybody who's got a GPU cluster.
	Well, again, it is the Pentagon that's always taken the lead in this.
	When it comes to disinformation, the Pentagon should not be fighting fire with fire, says one person.
	Except that you don't realize...
	Going back to when we were looking at the government's preparations about a decade ago for asymmetric warfare here in this country and the different training areas that they had for it.
	An urban training area.
	They had a suburban training area.
	They had a rural training area within their bases.
	A secure area within the secure military base.
	And they talked about it online.
	And as part of these discussions at the time, you had Admiral McRaven Who was heading up Special Forces.
	He said, look, we have to understand.
	Everybody watches these movies about Navy SEALs and Green Berets and Special Forces and stuff.
	And he goes, it's all about the kinetic stuff.
	It's about jumping out of planes and helicopters.
	You know, and going underwater and blowing up things and stuff like that.
	Because that's not what we're about.
	It wasn't how we began.
	And we've got to get back.
	And we began with psychological operations.
	That was Special Forces was all about psychological operations.
	You know, we would send people in and we would give them bait about a particular thing and we would, you know, put out a press release about this or such that was going to happen or the U.S. government was going to do this or that.
	And then we would watch and see which side the people were on and how they would line up.
	And I've said many times that I believe that's what Jade Helm was about.
	You know, sent that report there to Infowars and we pushed that out.
	Because we thought people needed to know it, but I believe that it was used to identify people that were going to push back against them, people that they would think were not on their side, because they're not on the side of the Constitution, instead of these people.
	And so that's the type of thing they would do in other countries.
	Special Forces is always about PSYOPs.
	My son says, I saw a story about scammers using a voice, cloning AI to impersonate someone.
	Yeah. Called his parents, pretending to be him.
	Told the parents he'd been arrested and needed money.
	Oh, there you go. Kind of like, it's much better than Ferris Bueller's day off, you know.
	You're going to have to empty out the bank account, Mom and Dad.
	He needs the money right away.
	It needs to be bailed out. You can send it to this address.
	Yeah, there's no end to this.
	But, you know, going back to the military, they've always been about special operations and SOCOM, Special Operations Command.
	Always been about PSYOPs, not really about kinetic operations.
	The U.S. military's SOCOM is hoping to deploy deep, fake, laden disinformation campaigns.
	Yeah, the government would never lie to you.
	They would never put out disinformation.
	Oh, that's those...
	Conservative bloggers that are put out disinformation.
	Government would never put out any disinformation.
	The leaked document is an updated SOCOM gadget slash weaponry wish list published in February 15 by the Military Unit's Directorate of Science and Technology.
	In it, an addendum describes SOCOM's thirst to get its hands on new, quote, advanced technology for use in military information support operations, which, put simply, is the U.S. military's propaganda and deception department.
	Those, quote, advanced technologies would be used to aid, quote, influence operations, digital deception, communication disruption, and disinformation campaigns at the tactical edge and operational levels, unquote. It would include unnamed programs with, quote, next generation capability to collect disparate data through streams, such as social media.
	Social media has always been the design of DARPA and, you know, internet, designing DARPA, social media, as I've said many times, all these deep state intelligence community people creating the venture capital firms or putting their people on the boards.
	Picking and funding the people that they knew would work with him and then let the best man win.
	And it was really a rope-a-dope.
	We're going to put this stuff out here and everybody gets it for free.
	And then we use that to create a life log for everybody.
	So to recap, the U.S. military wants to use deep fakes along with other next generation tools to forward its global influence for disinformation campaigns.
	Let freedom ring, they said.
	They said they're just playing 4D chess.
	We have to become evil in order to conquer evil, right?
	Well, you just be careful you don't become the monster that you fight, which is what we see over and over again.
	When it comes to disinformation, the Pentagon should not be fighting fire with fire, says Chris Messerl.
	At the Brookings Institute, left-wing think tank, their Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology Initiative, they told this to The Intercept.
	He said, at a time when digital propaganda is on the rise globally, the U.S. should be doing everything it can to strengthen democracy by building support for shared notions of truth and reality.
	Wait a minute. I thought our government said transgenderism was our core value to reshape the soul of America and all the rest of it.
	Well, you want to talk about reality?
	You want to talk about truth and democracy?
	What do they think this is?
	Superman or something? Truth, justice, and the American way!
	Faked artificial intelligence, deepfake and lies.
	The deep, fake, deep state is all we're talking about here.
	It's always been fake and deep.
	By casting doubt on the credibility of all content and information, whether real or synthetic, they ultimately erode the foundation of democracy itself.
	And again, democracy is not, yeah, democracy is not in and of itself the thing.
	Liberty is. Democracy is part of an approach that you use to try to get liberty, but it is not the end value.
	Democracy can become a mobocracy.
	If you don't have respect and a rule of law and a republic that says individual liberty is paramount, the democracy just degenerates into a mob.
	So, speaking of mobs, we have the European Commissioner, Wants to snoop on private messages, but has absolutely no idea how the technology works.
	I thought this was really funny.
	This is from Reclaim the Net.
	And it reminded me of Lindsey Graham.
	He sponsors the Restrict Act.
	And then he goes on with Jesse Waters and he has absolutely no idea what this is.
	He goes, you know, this thing is really...
	I know, I wouldn't support something like that.
	I wouldn't want to have that happen.
	I don't like that.
	Well, you are a sponsor of this.
	I am? Well, I have to go back and read that, you know.
	I have to sponsor it so I can find out what's in it, I guess.
	I don't know. The recent interviews of Swedish media of a person in charge of, who has, a European commissioner in charge of, listen to this, the chat control bill.
	And they're not talking about controlling chat GBT. They're talking about controlling your chats.
	The person's name is Ilva Johansson.
	She doesn't understand the bill.
	She doesn't understand the consequences of the bill.
	And she doesn't understand technology in general.
	In other words, she's just like Lansy.
	In interviews, she has repeatedly claimed that it is possible to scan end-to-end encrypted communications for child sex abuse material without breaking the encryption.
	So we've got to protect the children, right?
	These are the people out there who want to expose the kids to drag queen stuff and groom them in school.
	But, oh no, we're going to have complete control of the internet so that we can protect the kids.
	She says, this is the way it works.
	She insisted that the bill was good about sniffing for child abuse material.
	Sniffing. She said, it's about sniffing.
	Checking out, you could say, it's not as if you read the communication.
	I mean, it's like a police dog being able to smell if there is something there.
	I'm sorry, this explanation does not pass the sniff test.
	There's just too much BS in there.
	They said, however, it's not clear how services can sniff end-to-end encryption without actually looking at the message and decrypting it, right?
	You don't actually look at the message.
	It's just this encryption going by, and you're just sniffing it.
	I can't tell pornography.
	I can't define it, and I can't tell you what it is, but I can sniff it, that's for sure.
	In a transcript of the interview, the journalist Andreas Erickson presses Johansson on her claims.
	He says, can I just ask you one thing, Ilva?
	If that happens under this bill, would you and I be able to have contact in the future if, for example, you feel that you need to blow the whistle on the European Commission and you need to contact my press organization under source protection regulations?
	And would we be able to have encrypted contact that the authorities are unable to read with this bill?
	And she said, yes, that goes without saying.
	But he says, but if that's the case, then won't all pedophiles use that same encrypted technology?
	What then has been gained?
	And Ilva says, no, but the thing is, the only thing that the thing that...
	You're trying to think now.
	Sexual abuse of children, pictures of such, is always criminal.
	So what? That's a non sequitur.
	He says, but if you and I will be able to encrypt our communications, and surely pedophiles will be able to encrypt theirs too, Elvis says, if that material is shared, it may be that it is detected, that material.
	And he says, but then, isn't it encrypted?
	And Elvis says, but it's not as if you're able to read someone's communications.
	There are techniques to detect without breaking the encryption.
	I think it's very important that we defend the possibility and the right to encrypted communication.
	But that does not mean that we should say, as long as we use encrypted communication, that we'll not take steps to apprehend child sexual abuse.
	And so, the reporter says, He doesn't call her a technological idiot.
	He says, well, I guess I'm stupid.
	He says, I'm a technology idiot, Ilva.
	So please explain. This is how I understand it.
	If you send me pictures and encrypted documents, the authorities will not be able to read them.
	But if pedophiles send abuse images to each other, the authorities will be able to read them?
	Because there are technological solutions for that?
	Is that how I understand what you're saying?
	Have I understood you correctly?
	She says, no, you haven't.
	You can make a comparison because encrypted communication today is scanned by the companies.
	They scan all communications for viruses.
	So if you're on Signal, and if you want to send me a link of interesting article, when you start typing the address of the article, a picture of the article pops up because they're scanning it, and that's to make sure you aren't sending me any viruses.
	And so, the reporter Erickson says, okay, so you can see the image, but it's not encrypted.
	He says, Carl Emile, who is her opponent in this debate, he said, would you like to come in here and comment?
	He says, yeah, that's not even how Signal works.
	The way Signal works is that you get a preview because your Signal client from your device is taking a picture of the website and including it in the message that's being sent.
	Signal has no access to that information.
	And then Ilva says, but that's not what I'm saying.
	And the other guy says, you said signal works the way you said, which it doesn't.
	Again, this whole idea that they're going to regulate this.
	They're going to somehow be able to sniff bad information without actually reading it.
	And decrypting it, even though it's encrypted from end to end.
	Total nonsense. Finally, before we take a quick break, I'm going to come back and talk a little bit about the dollar here.
	The founder of Wikipedia says maybe it should be written now by artificial intelligence.
	You see, this is the issue here.
	Now, you know, not that Wikipedia is accurate.
	Wikipedia is just as inaccurate and fanciful and made up as ChatGPT.
	And it has the same LGBT values.
	I call it ChatLGBT.
	So the chat programs are just as inaccurate, just as biased as Wikipedia.
	So I guess you could say, why not?
	Well, because the thing that makes the artificial intelligence dangerous...
	It's the same thing that makes Fauci and Trump dangerous.
	People trust it.
	Right? Whenever you turn your trust over to these things, that's what makes them dangerous.
	Like Patrick Henry said about politicians.
	And he could have said the same thing about artificial intelligence if he could imagine anything as important as that.
	He said, trust no man, but bind them down with the chains of the Constitution.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	you you you Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Well, Nouriel Roubini, the guy who predicted the 2008 crash, is saying most banks in the U.S. are technically near insolvency.
	Hundreds of them are already fully insolvent.
	Why does he say this?
	He says in January 2022, we talked about this in terms of failing mechanisms.
	I had the economist on and we talked about the debt trap.
	The bond trap, I should say, of the Federal Reserve.
	They really did.
	A rope-a-dope trap of all these different banks.
	Because the way that they kept interest rates so incredibly low for a long period of time, let everybody buy into that, you know?
	It just became, you know, there forever.
	Never going to change, right? And then all of a sudden, they start jumping it by 75 basis points, you know, three-quarters of a percent interest every, you know, month or so.
	Never have we seen that kind of rapid raise rising in the interest rates as we did with that.
	And it really did set up a rope-a-dope trap for the banks.
	And that's the basis of where this insolvency is coming.
	Rubini says it, Paul Craig Roberts, who is the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan, is saying this.
	Everybody knows this is what's happening.
	Basically, he says in January 2022, when yields on the U.S. 10-year Treasury bonds were still about 1%, I warned that inflation would be bad for both the U.S. bills and for the German bonds that were at negative 0.5%, negative interest rates, and also for stocks and bonds.
	He said higher inflation would lead to higher bond yields, which in turn would hurt stocks at the discount factor for dividends, but at the same time higher yields on safe bonds, quote-unquote safe bonds, Would imply a fall in their price, too, owing to the inverse relationship between yields and bond prices.
	He says the basic principle, which is known as duration risk, says that as rising inflation in 2022 led to higher bond yields, 10-year treasuries lost more value than anyone with long-duration fixed-income assets denominated in U.S. dollars was left holding the bag.
	He said, making matters worse, higher interest rates have reduced the market value of banks' other assets as well.
	If you make a 10-year bank loan when the long-term interest rates are 1% and then those rates rise to 3.5%, the true value of that loan, what somebody else would pay you for, will fall.
	Accounting for this implies that U.S. banks' unrealized losses Actually amount to $1.75 trillion, with a T, dollars.
	He said, or about 80% of their capital.
	This is why, you know, Moody's downrated the entire banking industry.
	A lot of people are saying this.
	There's a federal rope-a-dope for these banks.
	They could not adjust to the situation as quickly as the Federal Reserve was raising interest rates.
	You think the Federal Reserve didn't know that?
	They were just, I guess they were lied to by the same people that lied to Trump, right?
	They knew perfectly well what they were doing.
	You know, they knew they were going to trap these banks with these bonds that they couldn't offload as quickly as they're raising the interest rates and making the bonds go absolutely worthless.
	And now, as he points out, You got losses that are nearly, you know, one and three quarters trillion dollars.
	Nearly two trillion dollars in losses of the bank.
	About 80% of their capital.
	Because of the unprecedented rapidity with which they'd raised rates.
	And the banks just didn't have time to adjust to it.
	He says, in fact, judging by the quality of their capital, most U.S. banks are clinically near insolvency.
	Hundreds more are actually fully insolvent.
	Because, you know, we have this fiat system where the Federal Reserve can come in and raise interest rates by fiat.
	And they can print money by fiat.
	I guess we should call it the fiat reserve.
	Because they dictate everything.
	Just arbitrary. It is what it is right now.
	So, hundreds are fully insolvent, he said.
	Many of them, many more, are technically insolvent.
	He said, to be sure, there's a counterbalance to this, because if you have rising inflation, it reduces the value of the bank's liabilities, their deposits, by increasing their deposit franchise.
	Since banks still pay near 0% on most of their deposits, even though overnight rates have risen to 4% or more.
	In other words, they pay you 0% when you put it in.
	So they can have that money there.
	They said this asset valuation will then rise as interest rates are getting higher.
	Indeed, some estimates suggest that rising interest rates have increased U.S. banks' total deposit franchise value by about $1.75 trillion, the same amount there, right?
	It kind of balances out.
	So it's been a thing to help to counterbalance the negative effects of their exposure to bonds is the deposits in the banks.
	He said that asset exists only if people leave their money in the banks, but they're pulling it out.
	Why? Because they can put it in bonds that will actually pay something now.
	The banks are paying people nothing.
	They could put it in treasury bills and get actually paid something.
	So they're pulling it out.
	He said, when you look at what we know from Silicon Valley Bank, the exposure and the experience of other regional banks, that the stickiness of people leaving their money in the bank, As far from being assured, if the depositors flee, the deposit franchise evaporates and the unrealized losses become realized as banks sell them to meet the withdrawal demands.
	So you're going to pull your money out. Why don't we actually be forced to, you know, the paper value of these bonds has just gone to nothing because they've raised interest rates so far so fast.
	We could just sit there and we'd have a paper loss, but we're actually going to have to realize those losses now in order to get cash to give you to take your money out of the bank.
	And he says bankruptcy then becomes unavoidable.
	And so, you know, the reality is we look at all this stuff and, you know, nobody cares about any of this.
	They only care about what's happening to Donald Trump.
	Paul Craig Roberts says, why is a dollar-based international system breaking up?
	And he summarizes it in a much less technical way.
	He says, Are devaluing the asset side of banks' balance sheets.
	This frightens depositors.
	They withdraw their deposits.
	Of course, not just frightened, but they can see better yields elsewhere.
	Depositors are also withdrawing because they can get higher interest rates.
	According to some reports, a trillion dollars has already been withdrawn from U.S. banks.
	Bloomberg is reporting rumors that Schwab's $7 trillion empire based on low rates is cracking from bond losses in the face of this vulnerability in the financial system.
	The Federal Reserve raised interest rates even further.
	Just in case you think that they don't know, as everybody's talking about this, just in case you think this isn't a designed collapse, He said, resulting from countries settling their trade balances in other currencies means a sharp rise in U.S. inflation.
	But guess what? Marco Rubio is only concerned about how he can weaponize the U.S. dollar.
	Today, Brazil, in our hemisphere, largest country in the western hemisphere south of us, cut a trade deal with China.
	They're going to from now on do trade in their own currencies, get right around the dollar.
	They're creating a secondary economy in the world totally independent of the United States.
	We won't have to talk about sanctions in five years because there will be so many countries transacting in currencies other than the dollar that we won't have the ability to sanction them.
	What a dime-in-the-world neocon he is.
	He looks at this collapse of the U.S. dollar, and all he can see is the loss of a weapon.
	And as I said at the beginning of the show, does he not realize that the reason it's collapsing right now is because they used it as a weapon against so many people for so long?
	And everybody is sick of people like Marco Rubio who run this U.S. government?
	It is self-destructing.
	Like I said, you give people power, absolute power, corrupts absolutely.
	These people don't care whatsoever what happens to you.
	They're looking at this and wringing their hands and saying, you know, we could lose this weapon of sanctions and all the rest of this stuff if we lose it all.
	What is going to happen to our ordinary life?
	Well, again, it's important to know what these people are up to.
	It's important to be able to get a horizon about the problems that they are creating.
	But ultimately, you have to do something yourself, because they're not going to do anything to protect you.
	That's why I'm happy to, you know, Tony's going to be on with us tomorrow.
	It'll be interesting to see what he has to say.
	Tony Arderman with wisewolf.gold, and of course, he's also set up davidknight.gold.
	If you want to go there and start to provide for your future with gold and silver, and they're not paying you any interest in the banks.
	As a matter of fact, you know, the dollar, the fiat dollar is eroding with the inflation and there's no security that is there really.
	And they're weaponizing and taking over all of it.
	I mean, you know, you have to hedge some of what these people are trying to do to destroy our country.
	As Paul Craig Roberts said, Washington is just too arrogant to comprehend the way the U.S. is perceived abroad.
	They don't even care.
	They only care about their power.
	They absolutely don't care about you.
	So you're going to have to prepare for yourself, provide for yourself, and set up things to exist outside their corrupt system.
	Thank you for listening.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core and dumbed down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

▲