Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 6, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:00:05

The David Knight Show Unabridged - 03/07/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	using free speech to free minds - That's right.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 7th of March, year of our Lord, 2023. it's Tuesday, the 7th of March, year of our Lord, Day 1000.
	1090 of the New World Orders.
	This is Tony Arterburn and I'm filling in for the great David Knight.
	This is Tony Arterburn and I'm filling in for the great David Knight.
	It's great to be back.
	Well, I'm in studio with Beans the Brave.
	That's my 12 and a half pounds, sometimes a little bit heavier Chihuahua mix.
	She's going to keep the studio safe from woodland creatures, intruders, bad vibes, all the rest.
	We've got a great show today.
	I'm going to host the first two hours, and then we're going to bring on Charlie Robinson, the author of The Octopus of Global Control and host of Macroaggressions.
	Always good to see Charlie.
	I'll probably be going to the chat.
	I had a time setting up the new stream code, so I hope everything's going out on DLive, Rockfin, Rumble, Odyssey.
	It looks like it is.
	We're on Twitter also, on David's Twitter.
	Let me check the Rockfin really quick, and I'll make sure that we hit the Go Live key.
	Everything looks good.
	So we'll go over some headlines.
	Obviously, I'm not David, so it's a different kind of show with me.
	I try to find what's relevant, what I find to be like signposts and warnings, trends, things like that to look at.
	So we'll go over some of that.
	And of course, your chats.
	I mean, if there's a way that I can go back and forth and look at the chat and do live, I promise you that I will.
	I know that a lot of times I don't engage with the audience like if I had a producer, but I'm going to try today, okay?
	So we'll see if we can get through this together.
	David, We're good to go.
	And we will get to another story on technocracy.news about the central bank digital currency.
	Also, tomorrow, Gard Goldsmith will be hosting the entire three hours.
	I'm going to be producing tomorrow for Gard and get him set up this evening.
	It's going to be great. So I'll be here tomorrow a little bit, just kind of in the background.
	As we watch the legendary Guard Goldsmith do his thing.
	He makes radio look easy, doesn't he?
	He makes all media look easy.
	So I love having Guard on.
	But I just thought, man, it'd be great if he just hosted his own show tomorrow.
	So we'll be seeing Guard. All right, let's jump into some headlines.
	Let's see what the Central Intelligence Agency wants me to talk about.
	Nothing. Not that we're part of Operation Mockingbird.
	Let me share my screen here.
	It's something I didn't do.
	Let's go to the headlines of Drudge.
	China warns USA of conflict.
	Xi, blunt rebuke.
	McCarthy scraps the Taiwan trip.
	And up here in the left-hand corner, they'll always hide some little blurb from Drudge, but it's Michelle O, 24-7.
	This is going to make Billy Ray Valentine grin because he's always talking about once they bring in, you know, Michelle Obama, it's over.
	Not that he supports that, but he's just talking about demographically, the media and everything else.
	And I just kind of chuckle and think, I don't know, folks, that may be the biggest gender reveal party ever.
	I don't know. If that's the case, if we get that, it might get weirder.
	Not that America can get much weirder, but that might be one of the weirdest campaigns in the history of ever.
	But we'll see. Maybe we'll have Billy Ray.
	Maybe Billy Ray will pop in the back office here and tell me what he thinks about that.
	He's certainly welcome to. All right, so let's go back to the China issue.
	And why is this important?
	If you haven't paid attention to geopolitics and foreign policy, this looks like it's organic.
	Like this is, oh man, we're really running up against a conflict with China.
	I have a hard time with this.
	Reason being, if you go back to something that David said, and I thought was very apt, and it was, you know, if Trump is selected in 2020, we'll have conflict with China, most likely.
	And if it's Biden is selected, we'll have conflict with Russia.
	But we might get unlucky and have conflict with both.
	And it looks like the third option, unlucky.
	And I've always talked about, you know, looking at Trump and the, you know, this faux nationalism that he put forward.
	Now, again, I supported the economic nationalism, the tariffs.
	I supported all of that.
	I think that's because that's more akin to our American history and what Trump was doing as far as the rhetoric.
	I mean, he did some tariffs against Chinese imports, but nothing like we needed to do to actually reset the balance.
	But I thought it would be more of like a faux conflict, not really, you know, kind of a nerf type thing, more of a wag the dog than anything else.
	And it wasn't that concerning to me because I knew the history of our relations with China going back to the Nixon administration.
	And this isn't covered a lot, but, you know, this was to have opened China in 72 the way that Nixon did and Kissinger.
	To do that was huge.
	You know, a Democrat couldn't have done that.
	Nixon was right about that.
	I mean, they would have been eviscerated by the media and, you know, called communists and traitors, you know, especially during the Cold War.
	And Nixon, with his so-called anti-communist credentials, was able to somewhat pull it off and was celebrated by the media.
	So, you know, he opened China at the time, and it was, if you read Pat Buchanan's memoirs, he said it was just like being on the surface of the moon.
	I'm taking this out of a, you know, a quote from his, but he's like it was being like in a different world.
	They were isolated completely.
	We didn't have diplomatic relations at all with China.
	You know, Mao Zedong got nuclear weapons, I think, in 1964.
	So they were a nuclear power.
	Again, they were isolated.
	We didn't have diplomatic relations.
	Our foreign policy was containment through the Truman Doctrine.
	During the Korean War, one of MacArthur's threats was that he was going to unleash Chang from Formosa, which is Taiwan.
	That's where Chiang Kai-shek fled to when the Rockefellers and Rothschilds and multinational corporations funded Mao Zedong's 1949 revolution, which is why they always do, right?
	So we had this opening of China and everything changed.
	Our foreign policy was turned on its head.
	We went into what you would call a spirit of detente.
	And what that meant was it was a realignment.
	We gave verbal promises to Mao that we would support a one-China policy.
	It was very important to Mao to hear that.
	So we basically just gave up Taiwan back in 1972 verbally.
	And again, we did this fast-forwarding to 1979.
	Zygmunt Brzezinski and Jimmy Carter put that in writing.
	It's on January 1st, 1979 that the United States of America recognized a one-China policy.
	So this was set in motion that we were starting to back away from our Cold War alliances.
	And again, we didn't support necessarily the Chinese going and taking it by force, but really on paper what it looked like was an eventual absorption back into mainland China.
	By the way, not that I support that, but you could see that the groundwork was being laid for that because it was important for us to have the Chinese as an ally in the Cold War.
	If you remember the movie Red Dawn, it was a great movie when I was a kid.
	I mean, this was, you know, the invasion of the United States by Soviet forces and Cubans.
	And there's a scene in there where they're talking about, well, who's on our side?
	And One of the colonel there that gets shot down says, well, it's about a 600 million screaming Chinamen.
	And they said, well, don't you mean a billion?
	He says, well, there were. So there was implied in the 1980s that we were allies.
	Not only were allies, but we were allies.
	You know, sharing trade and there was intelligence being shared.
	I mean, there was so much information that we gave Mao in 72 with that back channel communiques and things with Kissinger.
	It's unbelievable. If you read about it, it doesn't make any sense because if you fast forward to the 90s...
	You know, you have these bags of cash.
	I mean, the Chinese were giving literally bags of cash to the Clinton White House.
	And, you know, the Clinton White House gave the Chinese missile technology and whatever missile technology or weapons technology that we didn't give them directly, the Israelis would sell them.
	And then that really culminated in 2001 and 90 days to the day from 9-11 on December 11th, 2001.
	The Bush administration gave most favored trading status, nation trading status to China, which just opened up everything.
	What was left of the soul of America was pawned off.
	And, you know, I, ad nauseum, I know if you've listened to my shows, I'm going to repeat the statistics, but it's, you know, after that, we lost 55,000 factories in the Bush administration alone.
	It was One in three manufacturing jobs disappeared.
	It was a total gutting of what was left.
	Again, NAFTA did a pretty good job, but that was the fait accompli for globalism.
	So, you know, the rulers of this country, the Trilateral Commission, the globalists, believed in an Asian-centered 21st century.
	There was not to be another American nation.
	That's why you have in 1973, the year after we opened China, you get the formation of the Trilateral Commission, which is very important.
	A lot of trilaterals running everything now.
	And then, of course, the 1974, the next year, was the last year that we ran a trade surplus.
	And if you know how important that is to American sovereignty, if you know how important that is to American security that we had a strong manufacturing base, and that's why our history is full of that, then you'll see why that was important.
	Why is it that such a pivotal event to lose that wealth and technology, why it was given away?
	So I look at these headlines, ladies and gentlemen, and I have a problem because I do think that there's something really dangerous in them.
	It's not that I think these are fake anymore because I thought a lot of the back and forth with China and Trump was somewhat fake.
	Now I'm starting to get worried that the third option that David talked about, if we're really unlucky, we'll have war with both Russia and China.
	We may have our elite, whoever is in control of the levers of power, may indeed be trying to set us up for a worldwide war and lay the groundwork.
	Look at the Chinese balloon story.
	That was so bizarre.
	And the rhetoric coming out of Washington and delaying the Secretary of State's trip Because of this balloon and all the rest, you know, and just look, they're spying on us, which I thought was just pretty hilarious.
	The Chinese don't need a balloon to spy on the innermost workings of this government or our people.
	They literally own politicians.
	You realize the influence that the Chinese have?
	And by the way, the Chinese are a conduit to international banking cartels.
	So when you talk about You know, you talk about the Chinese government.
	Yes, they're communists. Yes, they're totalitarian.
	But they're also a proving ground for globalism, for the new world order, right?
	And so they own, by proxy, you know, through China, the major swaths of American universities and companies and land, right?
	This is massive. Russia doesn't have that.
	It's why it's always made no sense to me.
	Well, it does if you look at this as a controlled demolition of our forces and of American sovereignty.
	The obsession by the elites with Russia and the military-industrial complex with Russia, and they never talked about China.
	It was almost never, ever brought up, and that's because of the massive amount of influence that they had and have.
	So it is really strange.
	If you know the history, if you know what happened, they're counting on you not knowing this and just thinking, wow, this is weird.
	This is coming out of nowhere. Well, it's kind of coming out of nowhere, but at the same time, it makes no logical historical sense when you realize that this government and the policy of this country is I think it's something coming from the ruling class, was to build up China.
	And it looks like they could have, and this is something that Joel Skousen talks about, could have built it up to fight it.
	And that is a nightmare scenario that I pray that I'm wrong about, or this is something, this is a fluke.
	But I just worry, I look at these headlines, and this is something I wanted to bring to your attention.
	When you know the backdrop, that's what makes it even stranger.
	Because this is something I didn't expect.
	I thought, well, if they have some sort of conflict, especially if Trump was reselected, if Trump was reselected and they have some sort of conflict, then it's going to be fake.
	You know, maybe both sides kind of end on it.
	We'll have some kind of Cold War tension thing, and it won't be real.
	But when Nancy Pelosi went over and landed in Taiwan, you know, as the third in line for the presidency of the United States, and it's our policy to have a one China policy.
	We had almost really no, by the way, this is another throwback when we talk about no diplomatic relations.
	Not really.
	We had diplomatic relations, but nothing like we have with China.
	The first call that Donald Trump got as president or no president elect from a world leader from this is my memory was from the president of Taiwan.
	And if you recall, the media went berserk.
	Like, you're not supposed to even talk to Taiwan.
	So imagine how this reversal, and see, that's how it's even stranger, because the media, and especially the Fox News types, And this is where you get the fake right.
	I mean, there is no more clear picture of fake right now than the fake right, because you talk about blaming our problems on China, which is a very convenient boogeyman.
	I mean, the Putin's price hike was something, you know, Biden put sanctions on us, basically.
	But it's Putin's fault for inflation.
	Well, the right does the same thing with The COVID-1984 lockdowns.
	Oh, it's a lab leak, and the Chinese did it, right?
	And you have senators like Tom Cotton calling out China and talking about the threat that China poses.
	Well, I hate to run it for everybody, but the calls are coming from inside the House, right?
	I'm not worried about, you know, this is something, if you know anything about geopolitics and nuclear weapons and the stasis of the Cold War, You know, it is troublesome.
	But the outside threats are nothing like the inside threats.
	And it's always a misdirection.
	It's a magic trick that these politicians and power-hungry elite are always playing on us.
	Show us another, you know, a false enemy.
	You know, a false challenge.
	It's outside.
	It's not coming from inside. It's outside.
	It's not our fault. Like, we locked you down.
	We said you were non-essential.
	We printed 80% of all the dollars ever created.
	We bankrupted the country.
	You know, we destroyed the supply chain.
	You know, all of the damage that was...
	We psychologically damaged an entire generation of children.
	But that's not our fault.
	There was a lab leak. And the Chinese did it.
	And we were just so, you know, caught unaware.
	It's kind of like the balloon story.
	We were so, you know, it's like a pitiful giant.
	Like, we don't know what to do.
	There's this balloon that's flying over us, and it's taking all of our pictures.
	I mean, again, you see the hysteria.
	And all of this kind of tracks back to a manufactured enemy, which is how far do they want to take this?
	That is the question.
	And we'll see, you know, how much, you know, When you look at history, which is what I do, it's my wheelhouse, something that Henry Ford said.
	He said that history was bunk.
	But I like something that Napoleon, and I think this could be attributed to Edward Gibbon as well, but that history was a pack of lies agreed upon.
	So you look back and you know that international banking, bankers' wars, International banking is really the catalyst for so much of this.
	They play both sides.
	So if the origin story of the Soviet Union was the Warburgs and the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds and all the rest, and of course then we had the 20th century and the Cold War, both pointing nuclear weapons at each other, but they had special landing zones and airports for Rockefeller.
	Did you know that? Did you know that the Soviets also had manufacturing rights to make foreign aid from the U.S.? I don't know if you knew that.
	They had massive amounts of technology sharing and things that we did together through corporations.
	And they would, through us, through U.S. corporations working hand-in-hand with the Soviet government, would make the weapons that would kill our troops in Vietnam.
	Both sides against the middle.
	And we're in the middle, by the way.
	We're held hostage by this game that they're playing.
	Same thing with the Chinese.
	You have the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, major banking houses, always love communism.
	It's their favorite thing.
	They like to set up You know, through the Hegelian dialectic, these totalitarian regimes that they fund, they control top-down, they have all the, you know, the working machinery and everything that makes everything.
	They have it. They make it, right?
	But only one. It's kind of like a 15-minute city.
	You know, you get, oh, you're 15 minutes away from everything, and there's only one thing, right?
	It's the same thing with the capitalist so-called, the richest people in the world.
	The parasite class, the globalist elite, they fund all this.
	And communism is one of their favorite things to fund, if not the favorite thing to fund, because it creates a destruction of society.
	And they get to rule over that.
	If you haven't noticed all of this lately going on with our world and the emergence of central bank digital currency, the technology that the elites have jumped on, Is to create, I think, not only just a new world order, but the end of history itself, where they own everything, where we're the new serfs, that there is no competition.
	You go back to 1913, the reason that we have an income tax, ladies and gents, is not because progressives rose up and demanded equality.
	The income tax was given to you by the world's richest people.
	They exempted themselves to their foundations and they kicked the ladder over to make sure nobody could ever compete with them again.
	Then they gave you the Federal Reserve and the income tax was meant to pay the interest on the fake money, the monopoly money that they would make.
	So it's a rigged game.
	So that begs the question again, how much of this is real?
	This is something I wanted to bring to your attention.
	It's a thought experiment because we really don't know.
	Fear is the spirit of the enemy.
	Right? God wants us to live our best lives, to live boldly, to live not by lies.
	You know, something, you talk about Solzhenitsyn and what David talks about all the time, not living by that, not living in the spirit of fear.
	So I bring this to your attention not to be Not to just run up a headline and have some sort of manufactured fear system in my broadcast, but to kind of give you a background.
	This is a thought experiment. We run over it together, and I'm honored to be here doing that with you on my stream of consciousness broadcast on the David Knight Show.
	Again, David is out for the next two days.
	He'll be at the Tennessee Legislature and...
	I hope they will get some clips from that.
	If anything happens, he's welcome to stream into the show.
	Travis can always text him.
	We can always get David on the show if he needs to speak to his audience.
	Hopefully, too, I'll be able to talk to some of the folks on chat on Rockfin.com.
	Here in a minute. But let's take a quick break.
	I wanted to bring up thedavidknightshow.com.
	And that was davidknight.gov.
	We'll get to that in a minute. I'm drinking out of my David Knight mug.
	And, of course, the other one is back at the homestead where you've got first coffee, then save the world.
	It's now my favorite mug.
	I'm left with just my regular David Knight, which I love them both, but if you go to thedavidknightshow.com, folks, if you're finding this on podcast or wherever this show is served up, know that you can share this with others, and you can send them the link to the website that gives them the links to Rumble, Odyssey, DLive, Twitter, Rockfin.
	You can see where this month's gas gauge is at, where This is how the show is kept on the air by your generous donations and sponsorship by Wise Wolf Gold and Silver, which we're very, very proud to do, and Wolfpack, and we'll talk about that. But TheDavidKnightShow.com has the ability where you can order products.
	That's another way you can support David and keep the truth on the air.
	First coffee, then save the world.
	I wish I had all of those commercials that Travis had produced with the AI. It's one of my favorite things in the world is to hear the Kamala Harris AI version when she's talking about you can't hold coffee in your hands, right?
	You know what? It sounds so real in our world and what we're looking at in this part of the simulation.
	The David Knight coin challenge coin.
	That's something that Jason Barker did in Knights of the Storm.
	I was on the Knights of the Storm on Saturday.
	Great show. A lot of fun.
	I was proud to be there.
	So shout out to Knights of the Storm who This is something I talk to people all the time.
	They say, what can I do? I'm like, well, speak out.
	Do your own show. Write in articles.
	Get a substack. Information.
	We're foot soldiers in the war of ideas.
	All of us. And you can take up arms with the pin is mightier than the sword.
	Okay. Always makes me laugh because I can't say that without thinking of Douglas MacArthur.
	He said, whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons, which makes me laugh.
	But you get it, right?
	Words are powerful. Ideas can change history, and you can change hearts and minds.
	It makes the ruling elite, it makes their totalitarian experiment inert, if enough people know.
	Anyway, thedavidknightshow.com.
	How to successfully donate to David.
	And you can check out davidknight.gold.
	Another part of davidknight.gold is the Wolfpack.
	And I'll give you some updates on Wolfpack here in the broadcast.
	We've got a lot of great stuff going on.
	It's funny, I get asked all the time.
	Like, well, it's a really genius idea.
	Thanks, but it's not how I intended it to be.
	What it is now, with hundreds of members all over the country, and I've got a full-time staff now, I didn't realize what it was going to do and how popular it was going to be, and then how we're setting it up as a communications hub.
	It's really the answer to the central bank digital currency.
	I didn't intend for it to do what it's doing now, but I'm very thankful.
	I'm very careful not to take credit for things that I... And to be honest about it, because God knows my heart.
	I don't need to just act like I'm a genius.
	But yeah, it's doing really well.
	And there was a commercial that Kinsey did for me back when we first started.
	I'm going to play it a couple of times in the broadcast.
	I love this clip.
	I narrate the content, but it's a little overview of how we got here, especially with the debasement of our currency and I think what's going to be the demise of the dollar very soon.
	That's on the way and we can all prepare for that.
	It's one of the reasons that I put up Wolfpack.gold.
	And I want to play the commercial at least a couple of times in the broadcast today.
	So let me put this on. This is the commercial that Kenzie did for me back in September, October, or somewhere in that time frame, right when we launched Wolfpack.
	And I think you'll enjoy it.
	Stand by. I'm
	told by Billy Ray Valentine just texted me and said we had no audio on that video.
	So anyway, that's my fault.
	I don't know why. Sometimes my system is doing this.
	It picks and chooses what audio it's going to play.
	I have no idea how it does that.
	So I guess we'll just forego any of these type of audio commercials.
	I know David has one in here that works, so maybe use that later, but we'll just do a show.
	We'll just do it like Bill O'Reilly.
	Let's do it live. Just do it live.
	So thank you, Billy, for that.
	And this is when you're your own producer, folks.
	I know that you can sympathize a little bit with me, but maybe empathize more.
	All right, so let's just jump into some more headlines.
	We'll keep doing the news.
	Headlines and signposts on the road ahead.
	And then I want to talk about, there was something great there.
	That came out on Zero Hedge last week, about 10 days.
	I was able to find it because I wanted to bring it back up.
	And it had to do with one of the reasons that the Deep State murdered JFK in Dallas, I believe, was one of the speeches that he gave at American University.
	I always loved that speech.
	I'm a connoisseur of the spoken word.
	I love it when I can hear magnificent rhetoric because we don't hear that in the modern era.
	I mean, most speakers are flat.
	They're bombastic. They're hubristic.
	You get like a Donald Trump with the massive ego and all that, and it's not eloquent.
	But you go back, there was a time when we had learned people that could actually speak.
	One of them was John F. Kennedy, and he had a magnificent speech about peace.
	And I'd always thought that's one of the reasons that he was killed.
	And then somebody put out an article, you know, this is the speech that sealed JFK's fate.
	So I thought, well, that's, you know, something that's been in my mind for a long time.
	So we'll talk about that here in a while.
	But I wanted to, let's just go through some headlines.
	Again, we got about 90 minutes or so before we're met with Charlie Robinson of Macroaggressions.
	And I texted Charlie yesterday and I said, anything you want to talk about?
	And he just sent back, LOL, where do we start?
	And I thought, I'll just see you tomorrow.
	So that's how Charlie joins the show.
	He's going to be loaded for bear. I'm sure he'll have something in his wheelhouse.
	Something will have happened within the last 24 hours or whatever.
	Since we spoke. All right, let's go through some headlines here.
	This was on technocracy.news.
	Great website, by the way.
	Patrick Wood. I subscribe over there.
	You know, Anthony Sutton was his mentor who wrote the Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Wall Street and the Third Reich and all that.
	I mean, it's just in the Federal Reserve conspiracy.
	They were writing about the Trilateral Commission way early.
	So anyway, Patrick Wood, technocracy.news, uncivil liberties, DHS, domestic intelligence program.
	That sounds familiar, by the way.
	We'll talk about that in a second. The actual domestic intelligence program.
	There apparently is no protection to safeguard the erosion of civil liberties when it comes to the government spying on its own citizens, and even more so when agencies are weaponized to cause harm to those same citizens.
	The Constitution has experienced death by a thousand cuts over the last 50 years and is perilously close to final death.
	That is Patrick Wood's take on this story.
	For years, the Department of Homeland Security has run a virtually unknown program Gathering domestic intelligence, one of many revelations in a wide-ranging set of documents reviewed by Politico.
	Those documents also reveal that a significant number of employees in DHS intelligence offices have raised concerns that the work they are doing could be illegal.
	You think so? You know, it's funny.
	You kind of get used to things.
	But I never really got used to DHS. This came about when I was 22, because I was 21 in 2001.
	Remember they had Tom Ridge?
	He was the first head of the Department of Homeland Security, and they had different color codes, so you could know what, like, how afraid are you at yellow, you know, or red, or, you know, what even green?
	I don't know. Was it blue? Was blue a thing?
	They had different color codes to tell you how afraid you should be under that program, but the whole reason that you had a DHS was, oh, well, the The CIA wasn't talking to the FBI. They weren't sharing intelligence on the people that were learning how to fly planes but not land.
	It's comical when you actually start to unravel What 9-11 was, but that was the excuse that they gave, right?
	So clearly the answer, when two giant mega agencies don't share intelligence, is to create a third agency that will become even more bureaucratic.
	So that's what the government does, and that's not what DHS, it's kind of like the Patriot Act.
	The Patriot Act was meant to target patriots, you know, because we were supposed to have this worldwide civilizational clash of our time, just generational twilight struggle with militant Islam.
	Hey, where'd that go?
	Yeah, I've got questions on that.
	I fought in those wars. I thought this was supposed to be, you know, us versus them, and we're going to democratize mankind and all that.
	No, we destroyed some big parts of civilization.
	But where did that big struggle go?
	You know, I know that there are such things as terrorists.
	I got it. But, you know, if you stop funding them, like ISIS in Syria with John McCain or Al Qaeda, which means the database, not the base, if you stop funding them and giving them, you know, weapons and munitions and white Toyota pickups and everything else, It's funny how they kind of just fall off the map.
	And then the DHS, you know, buying billions of rounds, whatever they've got, you know, they buy all the munitions and all this stuff, kind of gearing up for something.
	Domestically? What is it for when I ran for Congress?
	See, I'm not like Rick Perry.
	I actually remember the agencies.
	The Dallas Morning News had enough of me because they'd ask me questions like, what are some agencies that you cut?
	My first one was the Department of Homeland Security.
	They didn't like that answer.
	There's a whole lot of things the Dallas Morning News didn't like about me.
	They also did a medical diagnosis.
	I don't know that you knew that the Dallas Morning News was a medical organization, but they clearly are, and I can maybe tell that story later.
	I've never been treated so unfairly, but happy to have been.
	That means I was over the target.
	Under the domestic intelligence program, officials are allowed to seek interviews with With just about anyone in the United States, that includes people held in immigrant detention centers, local jails, and federal prisons, DHS's intelligence professionals have to say they're conducting intelligence interviews, and they have to tell the people that they seek to interview that their participation is voluntary.
	But the fact that they're allowed to go directly to incarcerated people circumventing their lawyers raises important civil liberties concerns, according to legal experts.
	Well, the biggest concern is, why do you exist?
	That's the number one.
	Why are you here? Not only that, you're circumventing things because it's the gray area, the domestic police.
	That's what they're building.
	The specific element of the program, which has been in place for years, was paused last year because of internal concerns.
	DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis, which runs the program, uses it to gather information about threats to the U.S., including transnational drug trafficking and organized crime.
	But the fact that this low-profile office is collecting intelligence by questioning people in the U.S. is virtually unknown.
	The inner workings of the program, called the Overt Human Intelligence Collection Program, are described in the large tranche of internal documents Politico reviewed from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis.
	Those documents and additional interviews revealed widespread internal concerns about legally questionable tactics and political pressure.
	Oh, the wing of DHS is a political wing.
	Just like the FBI is.
	And if you think, I mean, when Trump talks about or anybody talks about smashing the deep state, you have to realize how entrenched they really are.
	And, of course, he doesn't mean those things.
	Those are great. That's kind of a Cambridge Analytica talking point.
	Somebody's feeding him some new lines, by the way.
	David went over that really well.
	Somebody's feeding him some talking points.
	Somebody must have run that through some kind of algorithm to see what people are wanting to hear.
	But what it comes down to is that the people and the leaders of these organizations and these things like DHS and FBI are totally entrenched for the globalist left or however you want to define that, but they are the state.
	Name me a right-wing leader or conservative, so-called, of any of these organizations.
	Name me one. I mean, you might find somebody in the lower echelons, but you're not going to...
	The leadership, the policy, you know, policy and personnel is policy and vice versa.
	And that is what we're seeing with these agencies.
	Unconstitutional, by the way.
	One unnamed employee quoted in April 2021 document said leadership of the ANI's Office of Regional Intelligence is shady and runs like a corrupt government.
	Another document said some employees worried so much about the legality of their activities that they wanted their employer to cover legal liability insurance.
	I hope that that's a need.
	Carrie Batchelor, formerly the Senior Legislative Advisor to the DHS Undersecretary for Intelligence, said the fact that the agency is directly questioning Americans as part of a domestic intelligence program is deeply concerning, given the history of scandals related to past domestic intelligence programs by the FBI. It's concerning.
	But that's what it's for.
	The Patriot Act wasn't meant to target people in caves.
	The Patriot Act, aptly named, was meant to target patriots and people that might have questions about the rising Leviathan in Washington, D.C., the political regime and the politicization of these agencies,
	which is massive. Wagner, who served as a DHS liaison with Capitol Hill from 2006 to 2007, said she told members of Congress adamantly over and over again that the INA didn't collect intelligence in the U.S., I don't know any counsel in their right mind that would sign off on that.
	And any member of Congress that would say, that's okay, said Bochner, who currently runs a consulting firm.
	If these people are out there interviewing folks that still have constitutional privilege without their lawyer present, that's immoral.
	Well, it is. And I think this is a sign of the times.
	You can certainly see, you know, you go back to 2020.
	And the heartbreak of watching this manufactured crisis, you know, past May in 2020, where you had Antifa and the Marxists and just anybody that really thought it was a good time to riot or burn things down out in the streets, being funded by the world's richest people.
	Pallets of bricks being laid out.
	There was a key indicator here that should have told you everything that you needed to know.
	You had Portland.
	The federal building there constantly being breached.
	People trying to throw Molotov cocktails into open doors and riots going on everywhere because people are funded.
	People are being flown around the country.
	DHS agents, I covered this story back in 2020, DHS agents that were taking people, the people that were rioting and taking them off the streets, they would take off their name tags.
	And I remember I did this as a soldier in Afghanistan.
	I had to take off my name tag because, you know, you could have your name recognized by these people on the battlefield, especially if you're detaining them for intelligence.
	And we were part of the first army company on the ground in Kandahar, Afghanistan, so a lot of it was intelligence gathering.
	So we had to take off our name tags.
	Well, the DHS was doing that while they were collecting intelligence on the Marxist And Antifa, because they were afraid, these are DHS agents, afraid that they would be doxxed, because some of them had been, and their families harassed.
	But you know what happened the next week after that story came out?
	The head of DHS said that the number one threat to the United States was right-wing patriot movements.
	I didn't mention anything about the people they had to remove their name tags for.
	They already knew who they're going to target.
	This other thing is a sideshow.
	And I'm not saying that every part of that movement on the right is the best way or that I support all of it.
	All I'm saying is there was once a group of people that were burning things to the ground.
	There was another group of people that were mainly having boat parties for Trump.
	Let's call it what it is.
	And a lot of social media, a lot of posturing, but nothing that was damaging, nothing that was attacking the government itself.
	But that's what they chose to demonize.
	And that should have told us everything we needed to know.
	All right, folks. So that's, I got two articles on technocracy.news, but we'll switch around a little bit.
	Again, this is just the chaos of my brain.
	I pick out things I want to talk about and we can just skip around.
	Let's see what else we've got. And I will give gold and silver prices today and more updates on that.
	In case you were worried that I wouldn't, I've got some articles on that.
	Let's see. Let me X out of this Wolfpack video.
	I can't believe it doesn't have audio.
	Alright, here's another something we can talk about in the wheelhouse of foreign policy.
	Ukraine wants U.S. to provide cluster bombs with drones.
	Cluster bombs endanger civilians by scattering small bombs across a large area and have been banned by over 100 countries.
	Well, I want to tell you a story.
	While we're reading this article about cluster bombs.
	And of course we...
	There's only like three countries that didn't sign the...
	Three major countries that didn't sign the treaty.
	Against cluster bombs. And I've seen cluster bombs.
	And going back to Afghanistan, before we get into this article, I'll tell you a little story.
	We were just told to go map the AO, the area of operations.
	Now, in case you didn't remember, and I happen to know, even at 21, 22 years old, that Afghanistan was the most heavily mined country in the world.
	You know, I knew a little thing or two about the Soviet invasion and, you know, the occupation there and how much they had mined the country and how much civil war they'd had.
	Well, we were just out driving around.
	That's what we were told to do.
	Sound familiar? So we were just going to go map the most heavily mined country in the world.
	You know, make new roads, because that's always really smart.
	Well, we went down this one path just outside of the Kandahar Airport.
	I was probably about 5 miles out, maybe 10.
	I started noticing all these yellow tubes, almost like pipes with little parachute-type deals off the side of them.
	The sergeant that I was with immediately stopped the vehicle.
	Once we were about a mile into this field of these little cylindrical things that were yellow, And he freaks out because he realizes that these are cluster bombs.
	Some of them were unexploded.
	Many of them were. They had not detonated.
	They can be set off by all sorts of things, even radio waves.
	Who knows, right? And so he didn't want to just back out.
	And that's the first thing I said.
	I said, let's just back out. And he sat there in panic, you know, and just yelled at me for saying, just back out.
	You rolled in, just back out.
	It's kind of like Ron Paul was telling the politicians in 2008 when he ran for president, we marched into Iraq, we just marched right out.
	No, you can't do that. Yes, you can.
	And anyway, it became like almost an international incident.
	They had to call the Canadians in, and they came in this giant truck, these giant armored vehicles.
	And drove down there with all their gear on and went through this big field and got all the way to where we were located and this officer, this Canadian officer gets out and he just walks right up to us and looks out and says, why don't you back up, eh?
	That's exactly right. Why don't you back up?
	And those were cluster bombs.
	So I got to see some of these up close.
	Ukraine has been seeking cluster bombs from the U.S. to use in its war against Russian forces and is now asking for a type of the conventional munition that they want to adapt so they can be dropped from drones.
	This is reported from Reuters and antiwar.com.
	According to House Reps Adam Smith and Jason Crow, Ukraine is seeking the MK-20, an air-delivered cluster bomb.
	They said Ukrainian officials were asking members of Congress to persuade the White House to sign off on them on the delivery from the recent Munich Security Conference.
	Cluster munitions scatter small bombs over large areas, making them more indiscriminate than other munitions, according to Reuters.
	The MK-20 releases 240 dart-like submunitions, or bomblets, after being dropped.
	The bomblets and cluster munitions often don't explode on impact, making them a danger to civilians who come across them, similar to landmines.
	Which is such a wonderful, beautiful thing that we're helping.
	Did you change your profile picture on social media to the Ukrainian flag yet?
	You need to do that, folks.
	Offer up your children.
	Offer them up to Zelensky, the t-shirt man.
	They're such a moral thing, right?
	Just no corruption there.
	They just need a few more bio labs on the border.
	They just need a few more companies to launder money for the Biden regime and others.
	And again, the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions that bans the weapon has over 100 signatories, but the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine are not parties to that treaty.
	So they get to use these things, you know, because, hey, it's about freedom.
	Looks like they need some more freedom over there.
	Since Russia launched its invasion in February 2022, both Russian and Ukrainian forces have used cluster munitions.
	Kiev was also accused of using the bombs in populated areas of Donetsk back in 2014.
	Oh, you don't say? I thought they were perfect.
	Aren't I supposed to worship them?
	While the U.S. hasn't banned cluster bombs, its forces haven't used them since one known incident in Yemen in 2009.
	The U.S. has been producing and selling cluster bombs to its allies until a few years ago.
	In 2016, Textron Systems Corporation stopped producing MK20s when the U.S. stopped selling them to Saudi Arabia.
	See, we sell them to Saudi Arabia because that makes it moral.
	So they can use them in Yemen as a proxy war against Iran.
	All right? You get it. Freedom.
	Freedom. But a congressional aide told Reuters that there are about one million of the bombs in U.S. military stockpiles.
	And, of course, Senator Lindsey Graham said the Ukrainian officials were pushing for U.S. lawmakers to pressure the Biden administration to provide cluster bombs in Munich.
	Graham favors sending the munitions and said he would lobby for them for this week.
	Besides the MK-20s, Ukraine also wants 155mm cluster artillery shells because, yeah, more freedom.
	Rep. Smith said he didn't think that the Biden administration would sign off on the delivery of the controversial munitions.
	Oh, didn't think?
	You sure? I'm not.
	I think they will have bows on them, probably with a gift card to something else for the t-shirt, man.
	Rep Crow said he might support arming Ukraine with the MK-20s if Kiev would remove the bomblets and use them on non-cluster deployment.
	Oh, sure. We'll make sure that we don't use the cluster bombs clusterery.
	We won't cluster the cluster bombs.
	Oh, sure. I'm sure that's the way it'll go.
	Absolutely disgusting. And, of course, it had to be Lindsey Graham.
	What is... What is the spirit of that guy?
	You know, he's worse than useless.
	He's detrimental in so many ways.
	I mean, you talk about... And the people of South Carolina just keep returning this guy to office.
	You talk about a rigged system.
	If I was in South Carolina, I wouldn't be worried about the Dominion machines.
	I wonder how this guy gets to be your senator.
	I mean, what does he have in common with you?
	Are you really so obsessed with war?
	Do you really only see the United States as great if we're bombing someone?
	Is that what makes America great?
	You know, if you're listening to, I'm sorry, but the baby boomers in the generation that listens to talk radio, that it's fading.
	And I'm on talk radio, conservative talk.
	But, you know, the callers on there, like you listen to Mark Levin, they get animated about war.
	They love it. And, you know, everything is, you know, Sean Hannity wears his CIA lapel pin.
	They're animated only by that.
	They can't see. America was great before we had an empire.
	Actually, it was the greatest.
	I mean, think about being born post-Civil War.
	No income tax. No social security number.
	You wanted to plant your flag and create a business and start your own way, build your dream.
	It was absolutely possible for you.
	You were free on the earth.
	Yeah, there was problems and there was corruption, but you could take your savings, you could put your silver dollars, your Morgan silver dollars, and put them in a coffee can and bury them in the ground and dig them up 20 years later and it would still be your dollar.
	I mean, there was a time that America was great.
	There was the westward expansion.
	And then we just gave that up for empire.
	You know, you have the Spanish-American War.
	They almost gave William McKinley a nervous breakdown because he was a Civil War veteran and didn't want a new war.
	And they kept pushing it.
	We invaded Cuba with Teddy Roosevelt and San Juan Hill and took Guam and the Philippines.
	I had a history professor once.
	I went to the University of Dallas for a couple of years when I got out of the Army, which was...
	Not exactly conducive to a 25, 26-year-old and running a business, but I did.
	It was a great book club for a couple of years.
	And the history professor talked about the taking of the Philippines and that had we not done that, that there was German warships that were going to roll in and they were going to kick out the aging and decrepit Spanish Empire.
	And so that was good that we took the Philippines, said my history professor.
	She said, well, what do you think about my lecture?
	I said, I liked it all the way up until we took the Philippines.
	She said, oh, no, why?
	She said, but if we didn't take it, then the Germans would have taken it.
	I said, yeah, and then they would have been held up on Corregidor on the Bataan Death March.
	She didn't like my answer.
	That's always where I go to, the what-ifs of history.
	All right, so let's... Let's see if we can pull up an actual David Knight commercial that will play the audio.
	And maybe I'll have to get the Geek Squad out here to figure out why my audio is not working with certain clips, but it will with others.
	Let's see if we can get this working.
	And hopefully Billy Ray will text me if this isn't up and running here in a second.
	Let's check out The Common Man, and I'll be right back after the break.
	The Common Man.
	The Common Man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com TheDavidKnightShow.com Well, I got a text during that commercial break that we indeed were going out over the air and it wasn't dead audio like my last attempt.
	So happy for that. Thank you, Billy, for texting into the show, letting me know.
	We got a great many stories yet to cover.
	I'm pretty sure I can do them between now and when Charlie Robinson comes on.
	But again, third hour. Charlie Robinson, the octopus of global control.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com and host of Macroaggressions, good friend of myself and the show itself.
	Always great to talk to Charlie.
	Let's skip around here.
	Again, I'm going to remind you of TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	I don't have Rumble pulled up here, but I might try on our next break to see if I can get up the chat on Rumble.
	The chat on Rockfin seems to be doing okay, and I'll go check on that here in a minute.
	But let's keep going here.
	I've got enough headlines to keep us busy.
	Maybe do a little bit of culture.
	Let's do that. Let's do some culture and then maybe get back to the wheelhouse of foreign policy and CBDC. That sounds about right.
	So let's jump right into this.
	This is Zero Hedge from the Epoch Times.
	A judge rules that USA powerlifting must allow biological males to compete against women.
	A Minnesota judge has ruled that biological men who identify as women can compete against natural-born women in USA powerlifting, the USAPL, following a discrimination case against the organization.
	Well, to give you a little background on myself, I was the 2001 USA powerlifting national champion.
	Before 9-11, I was part of the U.S. team.
	I represented the United States at the World Powerlifting Competition in Sofia, Bulgaria.
	And I got there on September 10, 2001, with my father, Tony Arterburn Sr., and we got to watch the controlled demolition the next day.
	I was competing against, and I thought I would have a great meet.
	That's for another... Another story, but I'm familiar with USA Powerlifting.
	I was a state champion in a couple of different states because I went around when I was in the military trying to find states to go compete in, and one of them I think was Michigan.
	So I know a thing or two about USA Powerlifting, and this is a fall that's been very far from where they were and a very sad story.
	I'm going to read on, but I want to give a little commentary too, because it just breaks my heart for all of the hardworking females and female powerlifters that I knew, that it was their life, it was their livelihood, it was their passion, and still is.
	And that's being taken away by our Marxian overlords.
	In his ruling, District Judge Patrick Diamond said the National Powerlifting Organization must cease and desist from all their unfair discriminatory practices.
	After finding that it had engaged in unfair discriminatory practices by denying transgender weightlifter J.C. Cooper the full and equal enjoyment of public accommodation because of sexual orientation.
	Sexual orientation.
	What does that have to do?
	With being a biological male.
	What does that have to do with sports?
	It has everything to do if you just make all this stuff up as you go along.
	Cooper, who was born a male, filed a complaint with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights in 2019.
	I remember reading the story then because...
	Ilhan Omar was all about making sure there was no more discrimination here, alleging that the organization had violated the state's Human Rights Act after Cooper was banned for competing in the women's division.
	Cooper then filed a lawsuit against USA Powerlifting in the state court in 2021, alleging claims of sex and sexual orientation discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act.
	The lawsuit, which was filed through a Minnesota-based advocacy group, Gender Justice, also alleged that powerlifting Minnesota had aided and abetted sex and sexual orientation discrimination under the MHRA. Wow.
	Well, if you don't know anything about Powerlifting, if you don't know just how much of an advantage you would have, I mean, it should be self-evident.
	If you're born a biological male, your muscle structure, your body fat ratio, your tendon structure, everything is different than a woman because you're built differently.
	Men are built for different needs, right?
	That's the hunter, right?
	That's what we're built for.
	We're built for that have that strength.
	Women are built for different things.
	They have different talents.
	There are some very strong women.
	I mean, just some, I met some in powerlifting.
	These are drug-free women, women that really just wanted to compete and love the strength sports.
	But you could never really...
	I mean, the women's records are nothing like the men's records.
	And that's just biology.
	And now they want to take this away.
	And this is part of the satanic operating system of Marxism, cultural Marxism.
	Cooper was separated and segregated.
	Lawyers for the weightlifters said in the lawsuit that Cooper began powerlifting in 2018 and fell in love with the sport.
	Ms. Cooper sees powerlifting as a way to find strength within herself has found a home in a community of strong, supportive women who come together around a shared love of sport.
	Is that true? Do the females in the sport, are they happy that there's going to be a floodgate opened up of biological males who identify as female being allowed to compete in that sport?
	You know, there's a difference between discrimination and unfair advantage.
	I mean, nobody's saying that you can't identify or do whatever you want, you know?
	I'm not going to take part in your fantasy and support that.
	I'm not going to just go along with it in totality.
	But no one's saying you can't.
	This is where you just start to see the rot of culture.
	And it just breaks my heart because I know how hard.
	And this is going to open the floodgates.
	Every crazy person who just decides.
	And South Park really nailed this.
	If I had a producer right now, I would put on the South Park episode of the guy with the, you know, it looks like he's Macho Man Randy Savage just going in and just smashing all the records of women's sports and doing everything, you know, and just dominating.
	And you have to celebrate that.
	It's really Orwellian, isn't it?
	It goes on to note that Cooper had been training to compete in USAPL Minnesota State Bench Press Championship and the Minnesota Women's State Championship in January and February of 2019, respectively.
	But in December 2018, USAPL sent an email to the weightlifter stating that Cooper could not compete because of Cooper's transgender identity.
	USAPL then revoked her competition card, which means she was not eligible to compete in future USAPL events, the lawsuit states.
	Diamond ultimately agreed with Cooper's attorneys, the judge here.
	By denying Cooper the right to participate in the female category, the category consistent with her self-identification, USAPL denied her full and equal enjoyment of the services.
	Well, you know, it's like I'm 43 now.
	I think I'm going to compete next month and just have fun.
	I started seeing what I could deadlift again because I own a gym here in southern Missouri called Maxfield Athletics and Training.
	It's a little 24-hour gym named after my training partner and best friend who died of cancer.
	He was a Marine. And, I mean, I can't imagine what he would think about this.
	He died in 2004.
	He was 22 years old.
	We had no idea all this was coming down.
	It was going to happen gradually, then suddenly, that we see the decline and fall of Western civilization.
	And to see this unfair advantage, it'd be like me coming out of retirement and deciding, well, you know, I can't win in the open men's anymore, but just add an A to my name.
	I'll go from Tony to Tonya.
	We'll do that really quick, and then I'll go and break all these records.
	It would just be... That's how insane all this is.
	And so sad.
	Yeah, that's common sense.
	It's called the truth. That's what it is.
	It's not only an unfair advantage, it's just wrong.
	We respectfully disagree.
	Separately, USA Powerlifting President Larry Maley told the KARE-TV is considering appealing the decision.
	Our position has been aimed at balancing the needs of cisgender and transgender women.
	Well, I mean, you can't really balance that.
	If you're born a biological male, then you have to compete.
	You have to dance with the one that brung you.
	I'm sorry, that is the way it is.
	And not everything is your domain.
	But this is where they just get their...
	They go and destroy everything.
	Because nothing will be left.
	The one refuge that a young person has, and I think this is kind of the spirit of things.
	When you take grown people, adults, and you take your child and you offer them up to the dancing drag queen, whatever, you take that innocent child who knows nothing of sexuality and all the complications that are going to come from that, and you shove them in front of one of these degenerates, Because that's what it is.
	Because you're a degenerate if you want to be sexually explicit or talk about your sexuality in front of a child.
	You're going to rob them of their innocence.
	It's all aimed at destroying joy.
	Destroying the ability to overcome things.
	To self-actualize.
	Because if you don't have outlets that are decent.
	That you can compete in.
	I mean, thank God that I had powerlifting as a young man.
	I mean, and I don't talk about this often.
	I was a world-class athlete until two planes and three buildings, okay?
	I was one of the top athletes in the world in powerlifting.
	I'd set world records.
	That all came crashing down because I had to go to Afghanistan and lose 40 pounds.
	Never was me. I had to get the shots.
	You have to get your shots. I had to get all my shots.
	I had to go invade another country that didn't attack us, didn't want war with us, to strip it of weapons it didn't have.
	I didn't have that future.
	I competed a few more times, but it's nothing like I was.
	That's not a sob story.
	I had that outlet.
	I'm grateful. It's all over my office and my library.
	I have a lifetime drug-free young man who had a lot of intensity.
	Spoiler alert, I still have it.
	It's masked a little bit more eloquently than young Tony.
	But I had that outlet.
	I mean, I can't imagine what my life would have been had I not had it.
	But if you take a sport and you make it to where, you know, it's kind of like everybody gets a trophy.
	Everybody wins. Or if you make it an unfair thing, then what's the point of it?
	You know, there's a...
	One of these transgenders may figure out that it's kind of like that episode of The Twilight Zone.
	Where the man gets to what he thinks is heaven.
	You know, he can't lose anything, can't lose at pool.
	You know, every time he pulls a slot, he wins.
	Every time he plays poker, he wins.
	You know, any girl he wants to talk to, she talks back and likes him back, and there's no challenge.
	And he finally tells the guy that he got there, you know, he says, well, what kind of heaven is this?
	You know, I'm not really enjoying myself.
	He goes, what makes you think this is heaven?
	Right? You're going to just have...
	It's a hollow victory.
	It's kind of like the swimming competitor.
	And we got to watch that debacle.
	And, you know, they've conditioned women just because of their nature.
	And I think, you know, because we believe in fairness and all this.
	The mainstream media, our educational system.
	And they have to clap and applaud.
	I mean, most women I know.
	I talked to my wife, Melissa.
	She is enraged that a man is the woman of the year.
	I don't think she's the only one.
	This is something that is being taken away from women.
	They're taking things away from our girls.
	And giving them to...
	It doesn't mean that the person that identifies...
	Why do you always have to clarify it?
	I hate clarifying it too.
	It's like, if you don't believe in this, then you hate them.
	No, I don't hate them. You just don't get to do whatever you want.
	It's be like, what if I identified as 15 years old?
	Now they have people identify as animals and different genders, and there's like 800 of them.
	Where does this end?
	The way that you destroy a culture with cultural Marxism is that you just take off all equilibrium.
	There's no real rules.
	There's no real parameters.
	It's all floating, and that's how you destroy it.
	So it's like if you wanted to identify as a certain age, I could just go into high school and say, well, I'm back and I've reversed my age because I believe it.
	See, I was born in 1979, but I identify as someone born in 2009.
	You get it? Right.
	That's... I think that's the logical conclusion here, and it's just heartbreaking.
	I thought I'd bring that up to you just to talk a little bit about...
	You're talking about signposts on the road ahead.
	They're just taking away any avenue for a young person to have real competition, have self-esteem.
	You get all your self-esteem from the state.
	Get all your self-esteem from the military-industrial complex.
	For sure, that'll help you out.
	We'll just offer you up, young people, we'll offer you up to the t-shirt man.
	And you can go join World War Z. That's how you'll find out who you are.
	Not through the peaceful competition of powerlifting or other sports.
	No, you won't be able to do that anymore because there won't be a point in it.
	They're just going to ruin it and take that away from you.
	And that really breaks my heart.
	All right. Let's jump around here a little bit.
	Let's see. I had...
	Oh, this is Ron Paul.
	We'll do this and then we'll talk about the CBDC and then perhaps JFK's speech that got him murdered by the deep state.
	Lewrockwell.com. I saw this this morning and I thought I'd add a little bit to Dr.
	Paul's article. I love Ron Paul.
	You talk about a consistent human being, a great man, if there ever was one, kind of like David Knight, who has been consistent in his values and never wavered.
	I don't agree with Ron Paul on everything.
	He's not quite enough into conspiracy for me, but that's okay.
	I think he gets the major points and is a man of peace, which we need more and more of those in the time of war.
	But he talks about the Federal Reserve's magic trick in big tech.
	And there's a few things I wanted to add here, but he has a great article.
	It says, Now you see it, and maybe soon you won't.
	Over the last year, the seeming ability of stock values and many technology companies to keep rising forever met resistance.
	This was true even for the major technology companies known effectively as Big Tech.
	During the last 12 months, Meta, parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, Amazon, and Alphabet parent company of Google and YouTube suffered layoffs and big declines in stock prices.
	These were the result of both bad decisions and changing market conditions.
	For example, the end of the COVID lockdown obviously reduced demand for Amazon's delivery services.
	Also, an increasing number of people are leaving Facebook and other meta sites for newer social media sites.
	Many of those who use social media for political organization, education, or discussion are abandoning Facebook and moving to places like Rumble.
	The magician in this scenario, the Federal Reserve, played a major role in big and medium and small tech's rise and fall.
	Technology writer David Stryfield, writing in the New York Times, recently examined how the Fed's 2008 market meltdown-related policy of near-zero interest rates led many investors to throw money at tech companies.
	In many cases, these investors would not have bought tech company stocks had the Fed not distorted the signals sent by interest rates, which are the price of money.
	The historic expansion of the Fed's A balance sheet, thanks to quantitative easing, also helped create a tech bubble.
	Now that the Fed is raising rates again, although still keeping them below what they would have been in a free market, the tech bubble is being popped as investors are able to get a more realistic view of tech companies' value.
	This is causing a painful but necessary correction.
	I agree with him on that.
	This is the law of fiat currency.
	This is the cause and effect.
	When you have a system of fake money, it creates a fake reality.
	It creates buildings that would never have been built without the flood of a central bank fake money monopoly printing machine.
	The companies, the valuations.
	We live in an age where The stock market.
	It's not your grandfather's stock market or your father's stock market.
	This is something else.
	This isn't even about profit anymore.
	You can list things like ESG, the environmental social governance, which is basically Marxian policy through the central banks and big banks.
	Who knew? You look at all these policies, but they don't have profit anymore.
	It used to be the saying that what's good for General Motors is good for America and vice versa.
	That's no longer true. We bailed out GM a long time ago and then gave them money to get out of their bankruptcy and all that stuff.
	It has nothing to do with these multinational corporations and especially big tech.
	But there's just all of this Massive buildup of fake wealth and people are tied to this system.
	You get people like Jim Cramer and they're talking about the FAANG stocks and everything's great and just keep putting it into tech.
	But if you don't look at the origin story of our currency today, Then you've got a blind spot.
	You've got normalcy bias, and it's going to get you.
	The American consumer has no idea the massive amount of fake on these numbers.
	Let's talk about this article.
	This is something that Dr.
	Paul wrote about. He says, for example, Carvana, which aimed to be the Amazon of used cars, went from $80 billion valuation to $1.5 billion valuation.
	$80 billion to $1.5 billion value.
	So this is the fake.
	You can't really do that and survive.
	That would be...
	I mean, you talk about...
	That'd be like my business.
	Like, oh, how much inventory you have?
	Well, we've got about $100,000 and such and such in floating gold and silver inventory.
	And I'm just throwing out a number. It's not much I have.
	But then I wake up the next day and, you know what?
	Nope. I've only got a couple thousand dollars.
	That's catastrophic. And this is what Ron Paul is saying.
	He says that's a 98% loss in just 18 months.
	Also, the Fed created a tech bubble and allowed Amazon to lose millions opening new businesses, including physical bookstores.
	Amazon announced in March of last year, the same month the Fed started increasing interest rates, that it would close all its bookstores.
	So you had this Trump lockdown.
	And by the way, side note, we were pumping in trillions before COVID-19.
	Very subtly, you had the largest exodus of CEOs in the history of In history, since then, before since, of the CEOs leaving, just quietly exiting, and then $6 trillion from the Federal Reserve into the overnight, known as the repo markets, to keep the liquidity up, and then you had to do the lockdown, because you had to get everybody locked down, and because they needed to pump in the other just massive, the 80% of all the dollars ever created.
	And how do you keep inflation from going into hyperinflation?
	Well, you keep people from doing too much.
	You keep them locked down.
	The tech bubble enabled large companies to grow via mergers and acquisitions.
	Many small and startup companies attracted investors with a promise of a big payoff from an acquisition.
	The frequency of tech-related mergers and acquisitions is a major reason behind the left's and some people on the right's renewed interest and antitrust laws.
	Oh, I'm a big advocate.
	You know, I love Teddy Roosevelt had great rhetoric.
	He didn't really bust a lot of trust, but wouldn't that be great if we had somebody like that or if we actually as a culture push back against Monopoly?
	The Federal Trade Commission's chairman, Lena Kahn, owes her position to her advocacy of using antitrust to limit the growth of big tech.
	Kahn's crusade against big tech has suffered more setbacks in the courts.
	However, Kahn need not worry since the Federal Reserve may do a more effective job of limiting tech-related mergers and acquisitions than the FTC ever could.
	Well, sometimes, you know, that's the hidden miracle from God Almighty to try to help us out in this jam because big tech is this monster, you know.
	Growing its tentacles, funded by the government.
	These big tech companies, we all know this, DARPA funded.
	They're extensions of the government, censoring people, spying on people.
	You've got the digital public square.
	Hand in hand, merger with the government, the textbook definition of fascism going on in real time.
	And I like it when they go bankrupt.
	Does anybody else? I like it when there's this billions wiped off the charts.
	But that's just nothing new to them.
	You know, name me a company out there, one of these big tech companies.
	Are they profitable? Or are they just floating?
	Because that's what a lot of times you see, oh, it's worth $44 billion.
	But they're not in the black.
	That's not how companies work.
	Again, that's Marxian central bank crony capitalism.
	Sam Albesmaid, principal analyst with Guidestone Insights, accurately summed up the tech industry's recent history of Stridefield's article.
	The whole tech industry of the last 15 years was built upon cheap money.
	Now they're getting hit by a new reality, and they will pay the price.
	Federal Reserve created bubbles and busts are not new to reality.
	They have been with us as the Fed was created and will remain until the system collapses or until Congress audits the Fed.
	Well, I would say, Dr.
	Paul, it will be until the system collapses because Congress is not going to audit the Fed because there's no way to get to Congress, really.
	There's no more Ron Pauls.
	Now, there could be. It'd be really hard to do.
	But the fact that there are no Ron Pauls should tell you everything you need to know.
	It's full speed ahead.
	The dollar's going not necessarily to zero, but it's going to digital.
	And that's going to be part of our future.
	We'll watch that happen. And I believe the problem-reaction-solution will be we have too much money We've expanded the money supply too much, and we've had a lot of these enemies like China, and they've been ripping us off, even though we gave them everything and rolled out the red carpet and sent them all the technology and sent them all the jobs.
	No, they did it to us.
	We're not the guilty men.
	It's the Chinese, or it's these other countries.
	It's whatever. We're being ripped off, and we have to rein in the money supply, and we need to control it.
	Because we have to protect you.
	We have to protect your retirement.
	We have to protect your benefits.
	So the way that you do this is you just sign up for this digital wallet.
	If you'll just sign up, and again, you'll need to biometrically be associated with this wallet.
	And maybe we'll use the Microsoft patent 060606 world patent.
	Maybe we'll use that. Because that ties cryptocurrency to you biometrically, rewarding you with cryptocurrency, maybe a central bank digital currency for, quote, approved activities.
	Go look that up. The 060606 from your wonderful friend, Mr.
	Gates, Mr. Bill Gates.
	All right. And speaking of that, this is something that David has talked about.
	Biden's Executive Order 14067.
	Promoting CBDC is now one year old.
	Technocracy.News?
	The devil is in the details.
	This 10-page executive order sounds innocuous until you get to the definitions section, where digital assets is defined as including centralized and decentralized finance platforms or through peer-to-peer technologies.
	Centralized means that the transaction data is transmitted to a central database for storage and analysis.
	Article 1, Section 8 Clause of the U.S. Constitution states, The Congress shall have power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and foreign coin, and fix the standards of weights and measures.
	Biden's EO, Executive Order, usurps congressional responsibility over currency, and not one peep was heard from Congress.
	Well, of course not.
	We've got the Federal Reserve.
	It's so federal. And it's a reserve.
	There's so many reserves.
	You know, Congress...
	It was Charles Lindbergh Sr.
	And I wish I had in real time, I'd pull up the exact quote.
	I don't want to butcher it. But after the Federal Reserve Act was passed, he knew exactly what had happened.
	And Congress just gives up its authority over coinage and over regulating that.
	It's funny. I had, and I got to watch myself.
	I had a customer come in the other day, and I just, again, it's just, you catch me off guard, and sometimes I'll start the show.
	Every once in a while, I'll start my show.
	It's kind of an involuntary reaction, but somebody handed me a 1963 $5 bill.
	Maybe I'll go get it during the break.
	But it's something interesting on that $5 bill.
	It doesn't say Federal Reserve note.
	And it was made in 1963.
	And it has a picture.
	Obviously, it has Lincoln on the bill.
	And the lady said, what do you think that's worth?
	And I said, well, it's not in great condition.
	But it's worth more than $5.
	And I said, you know why? And I said, because it's not a Federal Reserve note.
	She said, oh, it's not.
	She looked at the front. I said, you know what else about this $5 bill?
	This was made through executive order by John F. Kennedy, who we'll be talking about in a minute.
	And he printed currency direct from the Treasury, bypassing the Federal Reserve.
	And I said there was only two presidents in history that did that.
	One was Abraham Lincoln with the Greenbacks.
	And the other was John F. Kennedy.
	And they were both shot in the head in public.
	She said, whoa, that's disturbing.
	And I said, and it's interesting that Lincoln's on the picture.
	His face is on the bill that JFK put out.
	I was like, you're not supposed to print things that the bankers don't get something for.
	They didn't get to create interest.
	See, that's the thing. The rabbit hole of the Federal Reserve, folks, is that in order to pay off the debt that we supposedly owe, which I don't really think is real, but let's say we wanted to get the debt down and get our credit rating up, we can't.
	Because in order to pay the debt, you have to create more currency, which creates more debt because of the Federal Reserve Central Bank system, which is one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto, if not the number one thing that Marx talked about when in controlling a society, because all of his underlings loved it too.
	Lenin was that way about, he said, if you want to destroy a country, first debauch its currency.
	Everybody knows that. Hemingway picked up.
	If you're insightful at all, you understand it all tracks back to the currency.
	It tracks back to the money system and the supply itself.
	And fiat is fake.
	It's the head of the snake. Under this new digital currency, any transfer of funds to family, friends, charity, or clients will be able to be tracked by the nation's central bank that issued this virtual money.
	Big Brother will be in your wallet every hour of every day.
	You will not be able to buy a stick of gum without a Federal Reserve computer knowing where, when, and who, and how you put down that buck.
	We should be rightfully concerned about inflation, energy independence, aggressor nations armed with nuclear weapons, and woke public policies that degenerate the very foundation of the great country, but these are jabs compared to the enormous destructive power of a digital currency option slipped into the Executive Order 14067.
	Isn't it great that if you support a show like this, that it's just an honor for me to fill in for the great David Knight, that he's out speaking on this right now, the real deal?
	We're not talking about how great Trump is or some fake Cambridge Analytica Steve Bannon rode to nowhere.
	We're not doing MAGA. We're not doing LARPing.
	we're talking about what matters I'm just I can't but there's so much I'll break for a second on this subject matter but it's kind of in the same line This is what you should be talking about.
	This is the threat.
	This is our enemy.
	And meanwhile, you have alternative media completely ignoring...
	Ron DeSantis and that senator in Florida who wants to make you register as a blogger so you can have the privilege of talking about these politicians in Florida.
	Absolutely disgusting. So I'm glad to be associated with such a great show that's dedicated to the truth, and you should be too.
	There's a way that you can support the show, and we'll talk about that in a minute because it comes directly from you.
	We're not supported by any sort of nefarious things, and we're not supported by lies.
	Folks, you have no idea how much I respect David Knight because I know what it takes to build an audience.
	I've been in talk radio for over 10 years, and I realized when I started that I had a choice to make because a lot of people that I – the people that I were on, the same crop, the same class of people that I started with in Dallas, they've gone on to syndication.
	You know why I'm not syndicated?
	It's not because I can't speak on the radio.
	It's because I don't believe the things that they say.
	Because they're not true. And it's not that they're bad people.
	What I'm saying is they chose.
	They know their audience. They know what they want to hear.
	They stay within the parameters of that.
	And if you go off and you criticize this cult of personality with a Trump or MAGA, or if you just have an independent thought, you are banished.
	And it's not popular, and it's not profitable.
	If you tell your audience what they want to hear, then you can make a lot of money.
	But if you stick to the truth and analysis, and I watched my numbers fall in 2020, it was actually kind of fun.
	And there was other things that happened to me that I actually think would make other people upset that I thought were great.
	And maybe we'll talk about that sometime.
	I like my team.
	I like my group of people.
	This is Patrick Woods.
	When I was a sparring partner for professional boxers many years ago, I was taught to be wary of the jab.
	It's a tactic used to distract an opponent while setting him up for a devastating power punch that takes him down for the count.
	Biden is throwing jabs.
	The power punch is the little-noticed executive order with the innocuous number 14067 and its title, ensuring responsible development of digital assets.
	In the 21st century, where cryptocurrency and cybercrime are now embedded threats of our collective financial security, this executive order would seem to address these issues.
	This is the jab.
	In fact, the order includes language that allows the Federal Reserve System to explore the possibility of introducing digital currency into the United States.
	This means that your cash becomes so much colored paper.
	That would not be only catastrophic impact on our society and the nation's economy, unlike the United States.
	Under this new digital currency, any transfer of funds to family, friends, charities or clients would be able to be tracked by the nation's central bank that issued its virtual money.
	Big Brother will be in your wallet every hour of every day.
	You will not be able to buy a stick of gum, like it said.
	Like any jab, it starts with a faint.
	At this stage, the Fed is introducing the subject into the public debate and is weighing the options according to Eswar Prasard, a Cornell University economics professor who was interviewed by the Associated Press in August.
	Apologists for the White House insist that the executive order does not implement digital currency or give Washington the power to control it.
	Does anybody believe that?
	The mainstream, perhaps.
	Assuming this is true, what does it accomplish to introduce the possibility or even consider a currency move so radical?
	Yeah. I've read that before.
	I'm going to skip down.
	Executive Order 14067.
	This has been slipped into the national consciousness.
	Nations have risen and fallen far from the battlefield.
	Their destiny is determined by their economic policies.
	We should bring our collective outrage to confront even the idea.
	Of introducing a digital currency into America's future.
	If it becomes reality, we will not recognize our democracy.
	Well, I'm glad we don't have a democracy, but again, that was the Gate Stone Institute, and it was republished by Patrick Wood.
	But yes, it's the end of all things.
	Matter of fact, we're going to have Charlie Robinson on here very shortly in the third hour.
	I'll talk about it a little bit with him, perhaps.
	We were talking back in August.
	I was on his show, Macroaggressions, and he said, this is the hill to die on.
	We're talking about central bank digital currency.
	And I thought, it's everything.
	It's everything. It's so dangerous that I think that they will reinstall another Judas goat I think they'll bring in – it's got to be somebody that appeals to the grassroots.
	It appeals to the right in some capacity.
	I think that CBDC faces challenges now because there is some glimmers of resistance coming out of Congress.
	I read that on David's show a couple of weeks ago, and that's great.
	But what happens if we get another shill for the New World Order posing as an anti-globalist?
	Do you think CBDC gets pushed through?
	I do. That's the danger.
	That's why... It needs to be talked about regardless of who's running or what kind of cult of personality is talking about things that really don't matter or aren't true.
	All right. Let me take a quick break and we'll come back and I'll play the commercial one more time.
	That'll probably be the last time we play it today.
	It's only a couple of times.
	And we'll talk about the speech that got JFK murdered by the deep state.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	I'm Tony Arneburn, broadcasting on From the Wise Wolf Gold and Silver.com studios, along with my co-pilot and co-host, Beans the Brave.
	We'll put her on camera here towards the end of the show, I'm sure.
	She's off to my left, off camera, having a little bit of a nap.
	And we'll be right back after this break.
	Stand by. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at ddavidnightshow.com Thank you for listening.
	thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	All right.
	This is the David Knight Show.
	I'm Tony Arterburn. An honor to fill in for the great David Knight.
	I've been doing this since 2019.
	I can't believe it. I've learned a lot as a broadcaster listening to David, a great mentor.
	And if you see the ease in which he does this, originally I thought, well, I'll do the three hours.
	I'm so busy at the shop. It's hard to plan a coherent show, a three-hour show.
	I mean, it's a full-time job.
	So, much respect.
	And if you knew, if you were doing the show, if you were sitting where I am right now, you'd realize that the amount of work that goes into doing the David Knight show is...
	I've tried to do it.
	I remember my last time when we were at the Infowars studio in Austin...
	And that was a Friday the 13th.
	It was Friday the 13th in November of 2020.
	And I got there before anybody else.
	And I've told Billy Ray Valentine and others, I'm going to blow up this picture that I have.
	I need to put it on my wall. Because I was there.
	It was only me and the security guard.
	And I got there at like 5.30 in the morning.
	David got there way earlier than that.
	And I would get there and have at least two hours to print articles.
	But I just remember I took a picture of the studio in the dark.
	And, uh, just, I felt like that was the last time I was going to be there.
	I had no real reason to believe that, but, uh, just after that, you know, we all know what happened.
	And then David's been able to grow the show on his own and the show's gotten better and better and better.
	And, uh, It's an amazing journey and I'm proud to be here.
	We'll talk a little bit about how you can support the show.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com and of course DavidKnight.Gold.
	I will do gold and silver prices here in the show a little bit closer to the end after we talk to Charlie and we'll make sure we drop all the links and things that you can do to keep the show on the air.
	Let's talk about this speech from John F. Kennedy.
	A little bit of history.
	We'll break away from the headlines for a second.
	This was an article.
	It's on Zero Hedge. It came out on my grandmother's birthday, the last time I hosted.
	JFK's remarkable peace speech that sealed his fate.
	This is authored by Jacob Holmberger via the Future of Freedom Foundation.
	The deep animosity against Russia and China that the U.S. national security establishment has inculcated in the American people brings to mind the remarkable speech that President Kennedy delivered on June 10, 1963 at the American university that sealed his fate.
	Just imagine...
	What would happen to any American today who dares to say good things about Russia and China?
	The Russia haters and the China haters will heap condemnation and they will hate you back.
	The haters will accuse them of being Putin lovers who support Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
	In the case of China, they will accuse them of being communist sympathizers who support China's military expansion.
	There is no room in America for positive sentiments towards Russia and China.
	Through the power of indoctrination, the Pentagon and the CIA have succeeded in inculcating a mind of deep hostility all across America towards both Russia and China.
	But the China things knew, as I talked about earlier in the show.
	Of course, they did the same thing back in the Cold War era, perhaps even more so given that during that time, both Russia and China were communist regimes.
	Through the Cold War decades, Americans were indoctrinated the same way that Americans today are indoctrinated.
	They were taught to hate and fear the Russian Reds and the Chinese Reds for that matter, the North Korean Reds.
	The Cuban Reds, the Vietnamese Reds, the Chilean Reds, the Guatemalan Reds, and as well as the Reds, all the Reds in the world, including those who are inside the United States.
	Among the people that were expected to hate was Martin Luther King, not only because he believed to be a Red, but also because he had the audacity to point out that the U.S. government had become the greatest purveyor of violence in the world.
	They hated him for that, just as they hated Muhammad Ali, who dared to question the war against the Reds in Vietnam.
	They were both targeted for destruction.
	In the midst of all this anti-Russia and anti-China hostility, stepped forward President John F. Kennedy.
	He had had enough of all the hostility.
	Side note there, just before JFK was assassinated, they brought him the news that Diem, the leader of South Vietnam, He was killed in a CIA-backed coup, and it really bothered him.
	I mean, he did not authorize that, and he knew what that meant.
	It's all language.
	You know, the deep state and the military-industrial complex and things that Eisenhower warned us, it's all language.
	And they send messages that way, kind of like the mob, you know, sleeps with the fishes kind of thing.
	That's something that they sent on JFK. He recognized as a destructive and highly dangerous mindset that the Pentagon and CIA had inculcated in the American people.
	Kennedy realized that this mindset had brought the world to the brink of an all-out, life-destroying nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
	He also came to the realization that the Pentagon and the CIA had not been Had not been hell-bent on illegally invading Cuba, there would not have been a Cuban Missile Crisis.
	Right. Had there not been the Bay of Pigs, which was an absolute failure, which made him fire Alan Dulles, who was later put on the Warren Commission.
	Right, because nothing to see here.
	Keep some important things in mind.
	This is what the article says.
	At the time that Kennedy was delivering his peace speech, the Soviet Union, of which Russia was the principal member, was still occupying and controlling Eastern Europe.
	It was also still occupying and controlling West Germany.
	It was still maintaining and enforcing the Berlin Wall.
	China, North Korea, North Vietnam, and Cuba were still communist regimes.
	Kennedy shows up at American University and initiates a surprise attack on the Pentagon and CIA.
	Kennedy shows up at American University and initiates a surprise attack on the Pentagon and CIA.
	He declared at the end of the deep anti-Soviet hostilities, he declared an end to the deep anti-Soviet hostility that the Pentagon and the CIA had inculcated in the American people.
	He called for a peaceful and friendly coexistence with the Soviet Union and the rest of the communist world with a slap across the face to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
	He declared, What kind of peace do I mean and what kind of peace do we seek?
	Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war.
	It's an interesting phrase, the Pax Americana means.
	It's the American piece.
	It's like a reference to the Pax Romana under Augustine, who was the successor to Julius Caesar.
	You talk about, especially in the New Testament, render unto Caesar and all that.
	That was the Pax Romana.
	Some people were calling for a Pax Americana.
	Kennedy, and this is going to his speech here, he says, First, examine our attitude towards peace itself.
	Too many of us think it is impossible.
	Too many think it is unreal.
	But that is the dangerous, defeatist belief.
	It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable, that mankind is doomed, that we are gripped by forces we cannot control.
	We need not accept that view.
	Our problems are man-made, therefore they can be solved by man.
	That's an interesting observation, especially as somebody, if you humble yourself before God.
	You do realize, though, that God gives you, if you seek wisdom and you humble yourself, that God gives you the tools to undo the things that you did.
	So that is still true, if you have that spirit.
	It's not that... I don't think he meant that in a sense of arrogance that man doesn't need God or that we can do anything we want.
	Yes, if we are following the true path, if we are really humbling ourselves.
	I've read this speech and listened to it since I was 24 years old.
	I've always loved it.
	And there's something very beautiful about it.
	No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue.
	As Americans, we find communism profoundly repugnant as a nation of personal freedom and dignity.
	But we still hail the Russian people for their many achievement in science and space, and economic and industrial growth, and culture, and acts of courage.
	And no nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union in the Second World War.
	At least 20 million lost their lives.
	Countless millions of homes and families were burned or sacked.
	A third of the nation's territory, including nearly two-thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland, a loss equivalent to the destruction of the country east of Chicago.
	Talking about the United States.
	So let us not be blind to our differences.
	But also let us direct attention to our common interest and the means by which those differences can be resolved.
	And if we cannot now end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity.
	For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet, we all breathe the same air, we all cherish our children's future, and we are all mortal.
	The very next evening, June 11, 1963, Kennedy went on national television to express support for the supposed communist Martin Luther King and the American Civil Rights Movement, which the national security establishment, especially the FBI, was convinced was a communist front for a red takeover of the United States.
	Isn't it interesting? I'll pause here for a second.
	It's kind of an observation in the Hoover anti-communist-led FBI. Isn't that interesting that you look at these deep state organizations back then and the military-industrial complex are apparently anti-communist.
	What are they now? What does that even mean to them?
	They were supposedly cold warriors.
	And we had to look at Oliver Stone's movie JFK. He meets with Mr.
	X. Who had the power?
	Who had the motive? Kubono.
	Who benefits? What's the military-industrial complex?
	Because they were anti-communist and pro-war.
	There was the financial aspect of the deep state as well.
	But now you look at it, and they're just globalist wokies.
	It's the weirdest thing.
	Like, they're virulent Marxists.
	Where was the bend in the river?
	When did this happen?
	You know, I don't want either side.
	You know, you have Jim Mars had a great breakdown of the modern deep state.
	really the origins of the military-industrial complex in Operation Paperclip in the book he called The Fourth Reich, The Rise of the Fourth Reich, about how we'd imported all these, you know, statist Nazis and so on.
	And they really made up the most virulent anti-communist sect of the military-industrial complex post-World War II.
	So it's interesting.
	What happened?
	I've always been curious there because now you can't find somebody on the right.
	You can't find an anti-communist anywhere in the government.
	I mean, where are they?
	They don't exist.
	So it's interesting.
	It's like they just morphed into something, like they just...
	There's a metamorphosis of sorts from anti-communist totalitarian fascist to kind of just fascist in general.
	Fascist against freedom itself.
	The president had just thrown down a doubly dangerous gauntlet before the U.S. national security establishment.
	The author of the article goes on and says, I point out in my book, An Encounter with Evil, the Abraham Sabruder story, Kennedy's peace speech combined with his resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis, which enraged the Pentagon and the CIA, combined with his support of what was believed to be a domestic communist, sealed his fate. Several months later, they took him out on the grounds of protecting, quote, national security, just as they targeted foreign leaders on the same basis.
	No one in America, and especially not a U.S. president, is permitted to embrace what are considered to be heretical thoughts and policies regarding Russia and China.
	The deep anti-Russian and anti-China hostility that the Pentagon and CIA inculcate in the American people has become a permanent part.
	Well, I like that article because I thought of it years ago.
	And it really does kind of show you how far as a society we've fallen.
	You talk about excellence.
	And John F. Kennedy was a man.
	I mean, he has all of his flaws.
	He's not perfect. And there's histories, especially if you read His friend was Gore Vidal.
	Gore Vidal was related to Jacqueline Kennedy.
	But he knew John.
	I believe a lot of what Gore Vidal wrote about JFK. So it's like even more unflattering.
	But some of the defects...
	Get outweighed by things like this.
	We're talking about the stance that he took for peace.
	And I don't know, I'm not a Kennedy apologist, but if you know anything about the Cuban Missile Crisis and just how close we came to oblivion, to real World War III with massive tensions and how Kennedy ignored his advisers.
	So much had to go into Kennedy being president at that time.
	Now, this article may be right.
	There may not have been a Cuban Missile Crisis had there been no Bay of Pigs in 1961.
	That may be true.
	But nevertheless, Kennedy stopped what I believe he did, stopped World War III through a back-channel communique with Khrushchev.
	Khrushchev had the missiles in Cuba.
	Kennedy knew that we had the missiles in Turkey.
	He called the Jupiter missiles. They traded them.
	They swapped them out. And it was supposed to be six months later, delayed reactions, all the rest, but both offensive weapons.
	And he tamped down.
	And that's what scares me about today.
	You have somebody like JFK who, this kind of rhetoric, he wrote this.
	If not in collaboration with others, but he wrote this.
	And you look at somebody now, we have Biden, a Fetterman, you have, you know, in the realm of politics, you know, and we got the orange man.
	The bombastic, hubristic, you know, my hands aren't that small, guy.
	You know, he's got all that. I mean, just none of this is beauty and rhetoric.
	It's all ugly, right?
	And then you have, I mean, the sign of the times is you got men going and competing in women's sports, and we're calling it beautiful.
	It's... Well, it really is kind of an endgame cultural Marxism.
	You get to watch a culture fade.
	It's like the William Butler Yeats poem that the best lack all conviction and the worst are full of passion and intensity.
	And it's haunting, isn't it?
	But yeah, this was a great speech and something that I think we could all rally around.
	Because war is the health of the state.
	It's more than just Smedley Butler talked about war as a racket.
	That book's on my shelf behind me.
	It's more than just a racket.
	It's the function.
	It's the lifeblood. It's the alma mater of the evil, the nefarious entities that run this country now.
	Alma mater means nourishing mother, where you come from.
	Everything is born out of war.
	The war is funded by fiat currency, and fiat currency survives because of war.
	They're symbiotic.
	If you look at the simulations that are running, they're trying to figure out why are we setting up Russia and China to fight them?
	Well, because we need to retain the world's reserve currency.
	The only way to do that is to reset the grand chessboard.
	We're not going to win that.
	The BRICS nations, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa are 40% of the world's population.
	We are 5%. We have written treaties that long ago needed to lapse.
	We have, again, committed this nation on paper.
	We have a bankrupt foreign policy.
	So none of this can survive, and none of this is sustainable.
	If we pulled back right now and went back to first principles and obeyed the Constitution, we could save this country.
	We would have to dismantle the empire.
	We'd have to reset our currency.
	We'd have to give a commitment to free markets to turn the engine back on.
	We'd have to send a lot of people to jail.
	It'd be a lot.
	I think we'd have to build new jails for the amount of deep state degenerates who have run this country into the ditch.
	But I don't think we have...
	If we don't have the moral will to keep men from competing in women's sports, then I don't think we're going to turn the country around anytime soon.
	We may have to, like an alcoholic, has to hit rock bottom.
	We may have to get all the way to the bottom, ladies and gentlemen, before we can do anything different.
	All right, we're waiting on Charlie Robinson.
	Oh, just as I said that, Charlie Robinson, he's in the back office.
	He pops up. It's like he's reading my mind.
	He's inside my mind. Let's put Charlie Robinson on the screen here.
	Good to see you, my friend.
	Good to see you.
	I am not reading your mind, I don't think.
	I know that we didn't buy the same Neuralink unit from Elon Musk, so we're not connected yet.
	But yeah, I was going to introduce you.
	This is the author of The Octopus of Global Control, The Controlled Demolition of the American Empire, and what was the hypocrisy?
	Hypocrisy, right? I got that on top.
	I got that on my shelf behind me, but good to see you, my friend.
	Good to see you. Have we figured out all the, solved all the world's problems yet?
	I've merely listed a fraction of them.
	And then without... I'm much like the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.
	I can tell you all the things that need to be taken down, but I cannot tell you how to build them up yet.
	Yeah, I'm with you.
	We'll start with the premise that you and I texted back and forth yesterday.
	And I said, Charlie, anything you want to talk about?
	And what's on your mind?
	And you go, where do we begin?
	And I thought that's pretty funny.
	I mean, it feels like the wheels are coming off of everything, you know?
	And to recognize it is to be called a crazy conspiracy theorist, but the evidence is everywhere.
	It's like we've... The general public has a blinder in front of them.
	They can't see what's happening or they don't want to see what's happening.
	And it's really frustrating because I feel like this is a time when you would think we could kind of rally the troops and get everyone to say, hey, listen, things are going off the rails.
	Maybe we should all be paying attention.
	And yet you've got a large segment of society that just refuses to recognize what's right in front of their face.
	It's very frustrating. Yeah, it's that normalcy bias.
	I've been talking a lot about that and people are kind of just stuck in this same mode over and over, kind of expecting things to return to like 2019 era normalcy.
	And that's just not going to happen because we're not any kind of normal times because this was not an organic thing that happened to us.
	The last three or four years, this has been a planned event, which is clear.
	I mean, now that we look back and you see all the simulations and all the things, all the key things that had to happen to get us here in this current reality.
	So you know that it's manufactured and it's on purpose.
	So I think people are just really just trying to figure out where things are.
	I was talking this morning about the headlines on Drudge.
	And you know this as good as anybody.
	The headlines on Drudge talking about the tensions with China.
	We're making that.
	We're making the tensions with China, which is even more bewildering because we set China up through the 70s, opening them up, by the way.
	And then you have the Trilateral Commission being formed to have this new Asian century.
	We lost all of our manufacturing.
	The Clinton era bags of cash, the most favored nation status in 2001 by the Bush administration.
	So it's over and over again.
	We see the Chinese being propped up.
	I mean, Dianne Feinstein's driver was a Chinese spy, all this stuff.
	But the balloon, Charlie, the balloon, they're going to find all about us with the balloon.
	And yeah, it's all manufactured.
	It certainly does feel that way.
	And China has been simultaneously our biggest trading partner and the biggest boogeyman that we've created.
	We've always got to have an enemy that's just around the corner that's going to get us unless we give up our rights and pay more taxes, of course, or accept more restrictions put on our ability to conduct business or travel or talk to one another or whatever. or accept more restrictions put on our ability to conduct You know, so...
	China is just this convenient boogeyman that's rolled out from time to time to scare people back into, you know, oh, we've got to fund the military-industrial complex.
	Listen, America doesn't need to.
	We're protected for the most part.
	We've got some pretty nice obstacles called the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean.
	That does a really good job of keeping us protected from a seaborne invasion.
	I'm not so worried about that.
	I think I'm more worried about us being hollowed out from the inside by American politicians that aren't acting in the best interest of America, that maybe are compromised or are doing so at the behest of other countries.
	And it's not limited to China, of course, and there's others that have undue influence inside America.
	But when Berwick and I wrote Controlled Demolition of the American Empire, we were talking about how you You think that you're going to take down a country or take down an empire right away.
	It's going to be a quick process.
	And we sort of argued that if you want to do it the right way, you have to pre-weaken it.
	You have to pre-weaken this building from the inside.
	You have to sign on to these policies like NAFTA, and you have to hollow out the country from the inside by getting rid of their industrial capacity and getting rid of their creating a School-to-prison pipeline, which hollows out the social component of a lot of the big cities.
	It puts dads in prison on disproportionately long prison sentences in private prisons, which, of course, they own.
	We're sort of at this point now.
	We're 30 years into this plan to hollow out America.
	And we're getting to a position where you don't even really have to push down the plunger to set off the detonators.
	You just have to kick in the front door and the entire rotten structure is going to come down.
	And I feel like that's kind of where we are right now.
	Our money is worthless.
	Our word is worthless.
	We're the boogeyman all over the place.
	We clearly see what's going on in Ukraine.
	Ukraine has to be the biggest priority in the world.
	We have to give them everything they ask for.
	If they ask for our firstborn, we have to give it to them.
	They actually did recently ask for that.
	But don't pay attention to Ohio.
	Don't worry about those people.
	Those people are flyover people.
	We don't care about them. They're just dumb, white, Christian, Republican, conservative, nobody.
	We don't care about them.
	Let's focus on Zelensky.
	And I think even the average person is watching us going, Why is this a priority to us?
	If this is supposed to be America first, which it's not.
	I've got an episode coming out tomorrow called America Last, so it's kind of on my mind.
	But if this is supposed to be the plan where we're supposed to take care of ourselves first and then once we're sort of buttoned up, then we can go help these other nations around the world.
	And you see overt disasters happening inside America and you go, Yeah, let's fix this one.
	Flint, Michigan, no water.
	Alabama, or was it Arkansas?
	Ran out of drinking water, right?
	They had bottled water for like a long, long time.
	Palestine, Ohio. There's a big train derailment.
	It's a mess. Can we get the president to focus on this?
	He's like, why? He's focusing on Ukraine.
	Ukraine first.
	America last. That's where we are.
	And I think people are starting to wake up to this.
	I agree, and I think it's on purpose that they wake up to it in a sense, but also have that psychological damage of feeling helpless.
	I used the term, and I think Nixon used this back in the 70s, called us a pitiful giant.
	We can't fix these problems.
	This happened to the Soviet Union.
	You look at the invasion of Afghanistan.
	In 1979, they were considered the mighty Soviet Union.
	The United States was actually considered second-rate militarily at the time under Jimmy Carter, and they had that term called malaise.
	Throughout the 1980s, you had the funding of the The Mujahideen.
	We had the database known as Al-Qaeda.
	We had Tim Osman out there helping kill Russians that we were funding illegally through the CIA and third parties.
	They were losing in Afghanistan.
	They had the Stinger missiles. So you had this nuclear power that was being rattled and put off base by these supposed farmers and freedom fighters.
	Then you had Chernobyl.
	You know, and then so Chernobyl was a, it's like this massive psychological blow that they, I mean, it was a problem that this like erupted and they, you know, have really messy and how they fixed it.
	It's, I mean, it's still radioactive, all, all that you had Chernobyl and you had, um, The fact that Gorbachev at Reykjavik with Reagan, you know, they couldn't compete with SDI. You know, we made this thing up, the Strategic Defense Initiative.
	As you know, the Star Wars wasn't really real.
	We just made it up. It's like a boondoggle.
	We're going to start funding it.
	But they took us supposedly at our word.
	Depends on how far you want to go down the conspiracy rabbit hole of whether the Cold War was a big thing, whether it was fake or not.
	I don't know. But it does remind me of that, like that we just look pitiful.
	And people are supposed to believe that we can't, you know, for some reason, like the American spirit is still there, Charlie.
	I know that like you're not, when you're talking about the controlled demolition of the American empire, you and I both agree the American empire is a detriment to the American republic.
	It's actually... We're good to go.
	And all these other unnecessary agencies to spy on us and imprison us.
	We understand that the American Republic is under attack by that.
	The American people are still great.
	We're just not allowed to be. We're not allowed to fix our problems.
	You look at the train derailment and everything that goes on, the water in Flint, the infrastructure that will fly over the United States, our airports, our roads, our bridges, all the things that Trump talked about and didn't do anything about.
	We're We are just, again, being robbed of our future.
	There is no doubt.
	You can't look at this and not see the words on purpose.
	I just can't see how any normal person could look at the evidence and say, wow, this is not a plan.
	We're just slowly rolling downhill.
	No, it's been accelerated.
	And can you feel the acceleration, Charlie?
	I mean, can you feel that? I can.
	Yeah, like they're on a shortened timeline now.
	We've heard the 2030.
	Well, by 2030, it feels like it's been sort of condensed a little bit more.
	They're moving faster.
	And actually, I would suggest that that might be a good thing.
	Because the faster we get them to move, the more we get them off their timeline, the greater the chances that they make mistakes that they wouldn't normally make.
	Yeah. So I'm hoping for that, but we'll see.
	I agree with you.
	Remember the presidential election in 2020 and all the primaries leading up to that, and you had people like Beto O'Rourke And AOC and people that were out there and Bernie.
	And everybody kept saying, or even Biden, he was like, we only have 11 years to fix this problem.
	And I kept going, what's in 11 years in 2019?
	It was Agenda 2030.
	And we have 11 years.
	The world's going to have 11 years.
	And if you backed up, you know, before that, you'd heard people in 2016, 17, we only have 13 years!
	And I'm like, it's all based on the timeline.
	It's so overtly on purpose.
	I don't know how much of that they even understand that they're following it, but clearly there's an agenda there.
	I'm hoping we can avoid it without war.
	I think that when they start down this path, we have to realize like the WEF, and man, you talked about on one of your shows just like the strangeness of the WEF people, like the World Economic Forum.
	I mean, these people are not like super bright.
	They just have control of all the fake money.
	It just makes them look smart.
	You know, like they have their hands in the pockets of all these, you know, politicians and so on and so forth.
	It makes them look like they're powerful.
	They kind of are, but they're just not that bright.
	And I think they create variables, you know, because they're not God.
	I mean, they can plan.
	There's that old saying that man plans and God laughs.
	That's kind of funny, I think.
	I think about the World Economic Forum and the Great Reset, Klaus Schwabian folks.
	They set all this stuff in motion.
	And it's kind of scary because if you look at Ukraine and Russia conflict, I think a lot of our elites think, well, our rainbow flag is going to triumph.
	If we just give enough to the T-shirt man, if we just offer up enough billions or send them F-16s, that we'll win this thing.
	But we haven't won a war since World War II. So I don't know.
	Statistically, it's not looking good.
	No, it's not. It's not going to win.
	But again, I think they have this arrogance that puts other things in motion.
	And that's what I'm concerned about now is that they may not have understood everything that they've done with supply chains and with the global economy.
	You've talked about a lot of your analysis is brilliant on macroaggressions.
	I urge everybody, if you haven't heard of Charlie, if you don't follow Charlie, go follow Charlie.
	He's got great shows.
	It's very consistent. It's in-depth.
	It's a thinking man show, and I really love it.
	Thank you. There's so much there I think they didn't plan on Charlie that it's really come into fruition.
	Well, I had been recently on a heater about the Trilateral Commission, right?
	You know, how their goal is to, you know, as it started, it was more like, let's manage this from a financial standpoint for this world government.
	And then it became like, well, we're going to do that.
	But also, we got to get rid of this concept of the nation state, you know, and sovereignty.
	This is outdated. We don't need this.
	So let's open up the borders, right?
	And so you go, well, so who are the trilaterals, right?
	Well, there's a rule with the Trilateral Commission that you can't be an active member while you're serving in government.
	So you put your membership on ice and you rotate into whichever administration is the one that's just coming into power.
	So in the case of the Biden administration, you get Jake Sullivan and Susan Rice and people like that that come in and Anthony Blinken, right?
	And they come in, they're trilaterals.
	And then what do they do?
	Leave the southern flank wide open.
	And you go, I have a question.
	Why aren't we defending our southern border?
	There's 5 million people that have come across in the first two years.
	Why isn't the president down there making a big deal about it?
	Why are you removing all the barriers?
	And the president says something like, come on, man.
	Come on, Jack.
	I'll send Kamala down there.
	And Kamala goes down there and tries to give you a description about time.
	She tries to explain to you about space or school buses.
	And you go, stop the insanity.
	The border's open.
	Can we do something about that?
	And you go, well, hang on. And then you look at it and you go, these are trilaterals.
	They want the border open.
	It's part of their plan. They're not trying to shut it.
	They want it open. So we're here rattling, we're freaking out, saying that they're accidentally leaving it open.
	And my analysis is that it's no accident.
	It's part of the plan.
	And then what I started doing is I started looking into something that I thought was completely disconnected.
	And I found a strange overlap.
	I was doing an episode that I just recorded yesterday that hasn't come out yet on Cecil Rhodes, right?
	Cecil Rhodes, you want to talk about white supremacist ideas, you know, not these imaginary ones that the left is looking for behind every Starbucks.
	I mean, this is an actual guy, right?
	With a ton of money and influence and power in the late 1800s.
	And he forms this group called the Rhodes Scholars, right?
	And And part of what the Rhodes Scholarship was about, now keep in mind, this is 100 years ago when the British Empire was a big, big deal.
	But the plan was, how do we, you know, let's unite English-speaking white nations together first and foremost, and let's all come together as this first clicking up part of the one world government.
	But if that was mission 1, mission 1A was, oh, and by the way...
	Let's send some highly trained elites to infiltrate the United States and destroy it from the inside so that it can eventually be folded back into the British Empire.
	So then you go, okay, well, that's the Rhodes Scholarship Program.
	And you go, well, who's a Rhodes Scholar?
	Oh, I always just thought it was smart people that want to put it on their resume.
	And yeah, you've got to be smart, but you have to have a certain ideology.
	So what happens is after...
	For postgraduate, they take about 100 of these people a year.
	For postgraduate studies, they take them to the University of Oxford and they give them a training on this ideology, the ideology of Cecil Rhodes, which is white nationalism.
	Let's reunite the English-speaking world into a one-world government.
	Oh, and by the way, we're going to train you here in England, but we're going to send you back to the United States so that you can destabilize it from the inside.
	And you go, okay, well, Who's on this list?
	Bill Clinton. NAFTA. Deregulating the telecom industry, which allowed 50 media companies to click up into five to more easily be controlled.
	Deregulating Wall Street.
	Putting in place the private prison system.
	Running the largest cocaine trafficking system.
	Enterprise in the world in the 80s with George H.W. Bush, CIA and mean Arkansas.
	I mean, this guy's a massive destabilizer.
	But let's look at what about presently?
	What about currently?
	Who's destroying the country from the inside?
	Well, how about some of these names?
	Pete Buttigieg.
	Our transportation secretary.
	Isn't it funny how he just doesn't seem to care about America at all?
	It's almost like he's been sent here on a mission to destroy it from the inside.
	Wink, wink. What about Chesa Bowden?
	Soros' installed woke district attorney weirdo in San Francisco who decriminalized everything.
	Decriminalized crime. Right.
	And then crime went through the roof.
	Walgreens and CVS closed up and moved out.
	Target doesn't stay open past 6 o'clock anymore because they can't.
	Because guys are just coming in and looting the place in broad daylight knowing that the police won't show up.
	What about Jake Sullivan?
	National Security Advisor.
	Trilateral guy. He's a Rhodes Scholar as well.
	You go through this list and you go, oh, Eric Garcetti, Mayor of Los Angeles.
	What's going on there? Chrystia Freeland in Canada.
	That psychopath, World Economic Forum, Young Global Leader, Minister of Finance, who's destroying Canada from the inside.
	You start looking around, you go, Susan Rice.
	Rhodes Scholar. And you go, what is going on here?
	It becomes less conspiracy theory and more conspiracy analysis when you start to ask questions about, okay, I have a strong suspicion that these people are sent here to destroy America intentionally.
	That this incompetence cannot be just sort of...
	Brushed aside as, well, you know, the Rumsfeldian, well, mistakes were made.
	No, no, no. This isn't accidental.
	This is intentional.
	And I think that people need to sort of, you know, Michael McFaul, U.S. ambassador to Russia, Rhodes Scholar, you know, making decisions and saying things to drum up war with Russia.
	Why would you be doing that?
	That's a suicide pact.
	That would destroy America. Uh-oh.
	Uh-oh. What are we doing here?
	So I think there's a lot of people that need to be brought in for questioning on this, and I don't think it's accidental.
	And when that episode comes out in a couple of weeks, I encourage people to go over to Macroaggressions and listen to it because I think that there is...
	It's the only explanation for what we see, is that this is being done intentionally.
	Because at some point, the incompetence would get rooted out.
	People would recognize it.
	But it seems like it's just wave after wave after wave of people that come in and are propagandizing us or just making policy decisions that don't benefit America.
	It's really frustrating to watch.
	You're so right about the Cecil Rhodes and the Rhodes Scholarship.
	And I've talked about this before, and I love when I talk to smart people like you, and I remember stuff that I thought I'd forgotten.
	It's the extension of the British Empire by other means.
	You go back to the War of 1812.
	I mean, we're still messing with the British, still having to deal with them.
	They burned the White House to the ground.
	And then two years later, Andrew Jackson, I mean, just decimates the British in New Orleans.
	And then Andrew Jackson hated the British and he hated bankers, which he kind of thought was the same thing.
	I mean, a British soldier had cut Andrew Jackson with a sword when he was 14 years old and he was during the Revolutionary War.
	He hated the bankers, hated the British.
	And that was, you know, the, the period of history I was talking about.
	So many people don't see America as great unless we have an empire, especially modern people and people that call in to talk radio.
	I went to be bombing someone, you know, it's all about war.
	And I was saying, well, the country was great.
	You know, we had periods of history where it was worth fighting and dying for before we had an empire and go back to the, you know, post civil war, 19th century, you know, we didn't have a central bank.
	We didn't have an income tax.
	We didn't have social security numbers.
	You go set up your business.
	I mean, yeah, it wasn't perfect.
	And there was corruption and there was discrimination.
	There was all these things. But, you know, all of the systems that we got in the 20th century really tracked back to these British, like Cecil Rhodes, who had three...
	He's the only person in history who had three countries named after him and a dog.
	You know, you have the Rhodesian Ridgeback.
	I think it was Rhodesia, South Rhodesia.
	I forget. I mean, there was three different countries in Africa.
	They were named after Cecil Rhodes.
	He set up what you mentioned, the Rhodes Scholarship, but it was the Masonic Roundtable.
	It was the secret society he set up to interlink the British Empire, what was at the time in the 19th century, and the American Empire together.
	And really, Charlie, in my opinion, if you watch and you see how the dots connect, Everything that happened to us beginning in the early 20th century with the creation of the Federal Reserve and the influence from...
	Let's just face it.
	Cecil Rhodes left his fortune to the Rothschilds, the diamond mines and the gold and all the resources he had in Africa.
	Cecil Rhodes, by the way, Which is interesting because all these wokeys and people like Don Jeffries calls Pete Buttigieg Mayor Buttcheeks and stuff.
	This makes me laugh because these people serve all these woke Marxian agendas.
	And if you look at Pete's life and his professor and the people he had in...
	In college to teach him.
	They all follow all this stuff.
	But Cecil Rhodes was very much a, if you want to talk about real white supremacy, I mean, you know, the white man's burden and Rubber Kipling and that poem, like he took that to heart.
	Like that's what they needed to do is interlink the English-speaking worlds.
	And he was trying to do what the Trilateral Commission did back, you know, he was trying to do back then what the Trilateral Commission has seemed to have accomplished in our time, which is an end run around sovereignty.
	creating these organizations inside, you know, to link up the two countries.
	And that culminated, in my opinion, in the Council on Foreign Relations.
	Yeah.
	I mean, after World War I, our country still had the Senate.
	A lot of them were still holdovers from the time before we had a 17th Amendment, before the bankers elected, because we used to, the legislature would appoint the senators.
	So we had more of a robust reflection of what the state's politics actually were.
	It was very slow moving.
	And at that time, we rejected the League of Nations.
	So upon that, the Council on Foreign Relations was born in order to, you know, and you talk about the Trilateral Commission.
	The Trilateral Commission is made up of people that are from the Council on Foreign Relations.
	One kind of goes with the other.
	But these are British institutions.
	You know, the Rothschilds, the banking houses, it still stems from this rotting British empire, which I'm not a fan of.
	I mean, you talk about all of our history in Churchill and I think Gore Vidal made fun of England after World War II. He said they became an aircraft carrier for the United States.
	And that's basically what they've become.
	However, we were absorbed into them by this.
	I'm glad you brought that up because it is something to marvel at.
	Everything has been an inside job.
	Everything's been from the inside.
	We always talk about external threats, but as I like to say comically, that the calls are coming from inside the house.
	Yeah, they are. And it's funny because I've been working on this episode as well called The House of the Rising Scum, which is about Chatham House, which is aka Royal Institute of International Affairs.
	Now, their sister organization is the Council on Foreign Relations.
	These were started by... The British monarch in the early 1900s, the same year the Royal Institute for International Affairs, actually it was originally called the British Institute for International Affairs.
	It later got its royal charter a couple of years later and changed the name to Royal Institute of International Affairs, is a.k.a.
	Chatham House. And Chatham House and the CFR are one in the same.
	They're just different franchises of this.
	And that ideology of Cecil Rhodes goes right through this.
	And I'll tell you one thing I discovered during my exploration of who this guy was, was that for all those Wokeans that think that their side can do no wrong, I'd like for you to understand that Cecil Rose was a closeted homosexual as well.
	In fact, in that whole group of guys that were running it, it was known...
	That whole sort of circle, that roundtable circle of fellows were sort of into the domination of other men, both physically, financially, spiritually, and also sexually, too.
	So it gave them part of this power over other people.
	It's a real... It's a real dark area that you go into when you start dealing with people that get off on domination and every sort of aspect of it.
	And you don't like to think...
	That America has those sort of influences.
	We like to think that America's the good guy or that we have these morals and that we uphold them.
	And I think a lot of the people do.
	And I think a lot of the people identify with that.
	Unfortunately, I don't think our leaders do.
	I think that when you've got people that you have to question their loyalty, Pete Buttigieg's of the world and Susan Rice's, these people do not appear to me to be interested in the Continued success or to make America great again, so to speak, to borrow a line from Trump.
	But these people are arsonists that are set to burn down this country.
	And the ideology that they're aligned with is incompatible with American ideology.
	But they're installed.
	And what I learned about this when researching into Rhodes Scholars is that they basically just said that, look, we're going to take over politics, media, academia, and the judiciary with our people.
	We'll just install them in positions of high power, regardless of whether or not they're smart.
	I don't deny that these people are the intellectual horsepower is there.
	I just don't appreciate.
	I don't think that they come from the right place in terms of their ideology.
	So they're smart people.
	Obviously, you're not going to be in this group unless you're a smart person.
	But that doesn't equate with being a good person.
	And And unfortunately, these people have been sent to really hollow us out from the inside.
	And it's a shame.
	And yeah, I look back on this and I think, geez, did we really get our independence from the British?
	Or maybe this is like maybe on the surface, maybe they took off the chains, but the ideological chains remain and that the British influence never truly went away.
	And they did to us what we did to the black slaves, which is we said, you're free, but you're really not.
	You're under economic slavery and government slavery and fiat slavery and...
	And we're just going to change it from overt control to covert control because it works much better when the livestock believe that they're free.
	And so I'm wondering if the British influence ever went away.
	They definitely tried over and over again to get that foothold back with the Bank of the United States.
	You look at Andrew Jackson, his proudest accomplishment.
	He wanted it on his tombstone.
	I killed the bank. He called the international bankster class.
	He said, you're a den of vipers and thieves.
	I'm going to rout you out. Andrew Jackson spoke at a Narcopulco.
	We need to talk about it in Arcapulco here in a second, but it was interesting.
	You talk about where we didn't have influence.
	There was a wide swath of the American time frame, and I talked about it in the first hour, where we just kind of had this quasi, almost real republic.
	There was an interlude with the Civil War, but...
	I know I have this right.
	I'll have to make sure I fact check it after the show.
	But the bankster J.P. Morgan was born in 1836, and I think he died in 1913.
	His entire expansion of his life was the end and the beginning of the central bank, from the second bank in the United States with Andrew Jackson and culminating in the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.
	So we had this interlude, but everything after that, they got their foothold in.
	And it's the secret societies and international banking cartels, really through the British influence, that made all this possible.
	The influence that they have through the Council on Foreign Relations, these supranational bodies, And they're in secret.
	You know, it's something that...
	You know, they talk about that...
	I talked about the speech that got JFK murdered.
	He actually had more than one.
	You know, it was the American University speech about peace, which that is like...
	You can't have that. It's a crucifix to a vampire, man, for the military-industrial complex.
	They hate that word.
	There's no profit. How are they going to control people?
	How are you going to indefinitely imprison somebody, Charlie, if you can't have a war power going on?
	So... It's just interesting, that speech, but he also had that speech on secret oaths and secret societies and behind closed doors and in the dark of night and what we do by day, they do by night.
	That's really been the history of these organizations and the Rhodes Scholarship and placing people.
	It's kind of like Soros does with these district attorneys.
	And again, you get people like Fox News Who cuts off Newt Gingrich when he starts to mention that, hey, Soros funds this.
	Oh, you can't talk about who funds it, because then the game's over.
	So you've got to keep everybody in the game, Charlie.
	The game is the left-right paradigm, Team Blue versus Team Red, and they don't talk about how the things are funded by the same people.
	It's a game, right?
	With you in the middle, and we're the ones that are held hostage by this thing that isn't real.
	They'll get to the edge of the truth and then stop.
	It's kind of like... A gain of function, which you and I would both agree needs to be eradicated.
	If you're working on making a virus more deadly, you should be in prison.
	You should go to jail.
	You should be prosecuted because you're an Operation Paperclip Nazi scientist, is what you are at that point.
	But we talk about the lab leak.
	Oh, it's a lab leak.
	Oh, it's a lab leak. Yeah, probably.
	And we talked about that in alternative media.
	We were shut down for it to say, well, this is most likely, you know, look at the origins of the virus.
	But we're focusing on that.
	So we're getting close to the truth, but they just want that.
	And that's a gatekeeper. Yeah, it's just really we can all we all know what happened in twenty twenty one.
	We all know what really went on after the year of the worst virus in the history of ever.
	So we're going back To try to shroud everything that happened afterwards.
	We're trying to take you back to say, oh, it's the lab leak and it's Fauci.
	Well, some of that's true, but it was the lockdown and the real bioweapon.
	The real bioweapon is the jab.
	The real bioweapon is the thing they're still pushing.
	And everybody knows. When did you know somebody that got sick from whatever COVID supposedly was?
	I know because I pay attention.
	Everybody got sick in 21.
	I got sick last year from COVID, the very end of the year.
	And that's when I first realized, this is weird.
	You can't taste anything.
	You sweat all the time at night.
	It's weird. I never really had that as the flu.
	So I know it's something different.
	It's something novel. But I'm not so worried about that.
	I'm worried about What they made in their response to it.
	I'm worried about Operation Dark Winter.
	I'm worried about these simulations.
	I'm worried about the control that we just get to the edge of it.
	That's the issue, right?
	That's the issue with all of these policies put in place by these secret societies and these supranational bodies.
	It's just to keep the game going.
	Who funds it is not really important to the mainstream media.
	Who controls it is not important.
	What is important is the narrative and maintaining control over that.
	It's the most important thing.
	And so you get narrative managers like George Stephanopoulos and Lena Wynn who come out there and tell you that you have to be afraid.
	Both Rhodes scholars, right?
	Both installed to perpetuate a myth at some point in the future.
	We have the sparse pandemic document that came out in 2017 that simulated the outbreak of a novel coronavirus that sweeps the world.
	Killing 65 million people before a vaccine is the only thing that can...
	Come in and save it.
	And in that document, what do we have?
	We have emergency use authorization speculated and used.
	This is 2017, right?
	We'd never considered that before.
	We have lockdowns.
	That was never an option before.
	It's in there. We have fictional rappers and celebrities saying hashtag vaccines work.
	And what do we see in real life?
	Hashtags vaccines work.
	We see a rollout of emergency use authorization used for vaccines.
	They come out.
	A massive promotional push in the SPARS, in the fake SPARS pandemic document from 2017 that simulated something that was going to happen in 2025.
	We see the vaccines roll out.
	We see it become undeniable that they're killing people and making a lot of people sick.
	We see outrage in the public.
	And then the sacrificial lambs are banished as that document, as that 75-page document ends.
	You get to the tail end.
	It becomes undeniable that the vaccine was actually what was killing everybody.
	And you find that the head of the CDC... The fictional celebrity doctor, the Fauci character and all the celebrities that endorsed it are run out of society.
	What do we have right now?
	The heat is starting to get cranked up a little bit on Fauci.
	Oh, you know, mistakes were made.
	Oh, here's the hidden messages from Matt Hancock.
	Here's the email where Fauci is telling this guy, listen, don't go with that lab leak theory.
	Change your report. Oh, now you magically have money.
	It's coming out.
	It's following a script.
	And that's what makes me really nervous, is because it feels like none of this is organic.
	And it's limited hangouts coming out now.
	Now it's like, well, we have to investigate whether or not it accidentally came from a lab.
	Accidentally? We're good to go.
	Speculating about a virus that's going to come out and kill everybody, right?
	And then you've got plushies that you give out that are of coronavirus plushies that you give out at the event.
	I mean, at some point, there's just a little bit too much advanced knowledge for my liking.
	And to point this out, It's to out yourself as somebody that's not on Team America.
	You must want to kill grandma, or maybe you're a right-wing conspiracy theorist, or maybe you're a Trump supporter.
	You just like Trump. You know, whatever sort of...
	Insult. They can attach to you.
	They do that because they've got to protect this narrative.
	Like you said, the narrative comes out and the narrative remains until it doesn't, until they pivot to something new.
	Oh, look, shiny Ukraine over there.
	Focus on Ukraine. Oh, stand with Ukraine.
	Stand with Ukraine. Don't worry about COVID. We've got it taken care of, you know, until the next distraction.
	Oh, we've got to worry about Taiwan.
	Oh, there's Taiwan. China's making moves.
	You know, now we've got to focus on Taiwan.
	Do we invade Taiwan, Tony, next week, the week after that, or three weeks from now?
	And then that gets put through the echo chamber, nine months of CNN and Fox and MSNBC and the BBC talking about, when do we really get in there and defend, you know, when do we invade China and defend Taiwan?
	And they get you distracted and you get a year down the path and you go, wait a second, I have a question.
	Are we going to ever prosecute these people for COVID? And they're like, well, you know, listen, we can't live in the past, Tony.
	We're charting a course forward.
	I could see Rumsfeld in my mind, standing up there and going, mistakes were made.
	Undoubtedly, mistakes were made.
	But if we're going to move on and be the country we need to be, we need to chart a course forward.
	Moving forward.
	Moving in the thumb.
	We've got to move forward. You just go, it's all theater.
	It's very frustrating.
	I'll tell you, it's very frustrating to be aware of this.
	Because when you're aware of it, you see it everywhere.
	You see the scam.
	And I'm not trying to say that I have it all figured out.
	But I mean, you understand who the players are.
	You understand sort of where their backgrounds are, what they want.
	And they start to talk and you go, this is making me feel very uncomfortable.
	So Fauci is going to get sacrificed.
	And it's not my opinion that he's going to get sacrificed.
	I've read the script. It's the Spars pandemic document.
	He gets sacrificed at the end of this.
	I already read the script.
	I've seen the movie before it's been made.
	So that's where we're going with it.
	I did episodes on this two years ago saying, I hope it doesn't come true.
	But so far up to this point, and then I did another one a year later saying, well, it's still on track.
	It still looks like we're in act two of this three-act play.
	And when we get to the third act, that's where it culminates in, you know, in We go and we get these people and we banish them because they let us down the wrong path.
	It wasn't accidental.
	We know this. So they planned for it.
	And if you can control the narrative, then you have a pretty good chance of controlling the opinions of the general public.
	You'll never control our opinions.
	We'll always sort of pick this out.
	And David's audience knows.
	I mean, these are people that are aware of what's going on.
	So they're not going to get tricked into this.
	But the The vast majority of people that are working two jobs and trying to get the kids ready for school in the morning and come home exhausted, turn on the news, they listen to it for 20 minutes, they think they know what's going on.
	They're never going to figure it out.
	If you have the historical background, I'm not saying that I do, but I've been studying this for years, kind of like you have, and doing the research, you have a different map.
	So you're looking at this, you know, this is different territory to you, as opposed to if you just got fed, which is something interesting that my friend Kenzie, French Files, talked about going to the feed.
	Like getting your feed from the news feed.
	Like you're just like an animal showing up and getting that feed.
	So if you don't buy that, you know, and it's like the next thing, it's like it's getting ridiculous.
	Like, oh, we have unvaccinated UFOs that are possibly white supremacists over the...
	And they're driving balloons, ladies and gentlemen.
	We have to shoot them down with a $400,000 Sidewinder missile or a bleep blorp is going to, you know, he's going to expose you to COVID-20.
	And that's where we are now.
	Like this narrative machine and you talk about simulations and I'm like...
	We're like Event 201 plus Dark Winter plus Spars divided by Deagle.com right now.
	There's something just totally weird about it and it's hard to find equilibrium.
	It's hard to find your balance because we're not heavily funded in alternative media.
	We're doing research.
	There's great scholars and journalists out there and you're one of them.
	We're just people.
	We're just regular people and trying to find out We don't have the massive amount of funds and resources that the mainstream does and just doesn't use.
	I had a story I read on my show the other day.
	They accidentally covered the Ukraine conflict and they accidentally stumbled upon the fact that they're not going to be able to kick Russia out of Crimea.
	The guy reported it and now he's on the kill list.
	Right, right, right. If he accidentally did that...
	He didn't mean to. I was just trying to investigate, you know?
	If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know, then I don't know what will.
	The guy that honestly...
	I don't know. He had a Jerry Maguire moment, right?
	He woke up in the morning and decided he was going to tell the truth and came out there and said, I just don't think they're going to take Crimea back.
	And so were you promoted for this amazing journalism?
	No, you were put on a kill list for it because how dare you tell the truth about this?
	We're not in a...
	We didn't send you out here to tell the truth.
	We sent you out here to be part of the propaganda.
	I mean, listen, nobody's going to believe that those air raid sirens are real unless you keep telling the public that we're in mortal danger when Joe Biden goes out there and walks around.
	Hey, where's your security?
	Air raid sirens and you've got the most important, the leader of the free world, trademark, out there about to get evaporated by a An inbound cruise missile and the White House staff and the Secret Service just allow him to just continue wandering.
	That's because it's all fake.
	Like all of this.
	It's just a gigantic...
	You're like, you might as well be on the Warner Brothers set, you know, as far as I'm concerned.
	Believe me, I haven't been a part of...
	You know, the invasion of a couple of countries.
	Not saying that I'm, like, super proud of it.
	It's just part of it. And you can realize, like, the propaganda is heavy.
	Like, even at the time, I remember...
	Seeing stuff that was on the news compared to what was on the ground, I'm like, well, that really didn't happen that way.
	That was an awakening to me.
	That's not really how that went down.
	Then they would embed a reporter with you, and then the news out of that would be so much different than what you're actually seeing.
	We see that.
	It's interesting, and I'll change gears a little bit because I want to get your opinion, but it's kind of in the same vein.
	They're trying to accomplish something with the narrative.
	Obviously, there's a direction that we're supposed to go.
	You've written about it and the controlled demolition of the American Empire.
	Obviously, the America was set up to be looted, to have its assets tapered off and sold off.
	Again, it's kind of like a corporation that Mitt Romney is going to buy with Bain Capital.
	They're going to break it up and make it great.
	Job creators, Charlie.
	But I was reading in that JFK speech, and then the author was talking about how the enemies of the deep state at the time, the FBI and the CIA and others, these were like ardent, cold warrior, right-winger, military-industrial complex type, the type that Mr. X was referring to in the movie JFK, you know, like just warmongers and anti-communists.
	You fast forward to our time, There are no right-wingers, but it's the same dangerous deep state.
	This is kind of off-topic, but still sort of in the same vein.
	Where was the bend in the river?
	I think you and I agree, the Operation Paperclip, Nazi scientists, people, and they made up, according to Jim Mars, the rise of the Fourth Reich was inside the military-industrial complex after World War II. I agree with that.
	I'm probably set up by the bankers, meant to control the monster they made in the Soviet Union.
	Where are we now? If you don't find those, there's no anti-communists, but they're still fascists.
	How does that even work? Yeah.
	Yeah, it's funny. I mean, I remember when the left was anti-war, you know, and now they're on MSNBC pushing it harder than any, and the Republican Party's going like, or at least the Republicans themselves are going, do we really need to start this war?
	I think every big, major, pivotal event that changed America in particular, probably the world as well, allowed them to You know, put us on this path.
	JFK was one, obviously.
	Boom. Everything sort of changed after that.
	Then you go a couple decades, and you have the fall of the Soviet Union.
	You go, well, that looked like a controlled demolition as well.
	Hollow it out from the inside with their currency.
	You know, drag it into an unwinnable war in Afghanistan for 10 years.
	That'll show them, right?
	And break them up, the controlled demolition of the Soviet Union.
	And Jeff and I actually kind of make that comparison.
	It's not so much that Russia went away.
	It's that the Soviet Union went away, all those satellite nations.
	And we described it the way somebody that was stuck on a snowy mountain facing hypothermia, what your body does is it prioritizes the blood flow.
	You're going to lose your fingers and your toes, but it'll keep your heart and brain alive, keep you alive by prioritizing the blood flow.
	So those external things fall away.
	You're left with Mother Russia.
	We have 9-11, right?
	9-11, the Patriot Act, the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and TSA and these agencies that are not for our protection at all.
	They're set there to create some form of police state, the removal of our rights.
	And then you have COVID and medical martial law takeover, again, with the removal of our rights for our safety, for your safety, just as the Nazis said, you know.
	And you have this incremental move towards fascism.
	And if you can do it over a long enough timeline, it seems almost like a natural progression.
	But it's anything but a natural progression.
	It's been made to happen.
	And so when we get to this place now, we're looking back on the breakup of the Soviet Union, and you go, well, here's the American Empire.
	What did we get dragged into?
	Afghanistan. Again, not 10 years, 20 years, right?
	And now we're talking about doing, now we're in another unwinnable war.
	Not officially, of course, but financially and militarily, we're supporting another boondoggle.
	While we need that money back here at home.
	So you feel like it's just a slow move towards destroying and hollowing out this America, this empire.
	And I would suggest that this has been in the works for a very long time.
	And I agree with Jim Mars talking about the Fourth Reich.
	Fourth Reich? Fourth Industrial Revolution?
	What's the difference, right?
	It's the same ideology of we're in charge.
	We've got the technology.
	And it always makes me think of Daniel Inouye when he's talking about this secret government that has its own funding mechanisms and its own air force and its own military.
	And then you have Bill Clinton on a, I would assume, a moment of clarity, not one that he normally says, there's a secret government and I don't control it.
	And you go, okay, let's talk about that.
	Because apparently the parasite has taken control of the host.
	And we're in a situation now where this parasite secret government has taken control of the host and it's going to kill it.
	And in the process, potentially kill itself.
	So it's a genocidal mentality that I... I can maybe understand from a clinical standpoint, but I can't internally understand this.
	I just don't think like these people.
	And you don't either. And so we're at a severe disadvantage when we drag our biases, which is we're normal, nice, good people that want the best for everyone.
	And we're trying to analyze a situation that's run by total psychopaths that aren't hung up on things like that.
	They're free to cross lines that you and I would never dream of crossing.
	They're not saddled with this sort of conscience or something like that.
	And so I'm worried.
	I'm worried about that because I feel like we have limitations on how much we're willing to defend ourselves in.
	And I feel like these people, there are no limits to what they'll do.
	And if they want to unleash a virus on the population and blame it on something else, they'll do it.
	And COVID, I think, was a test run.
	I think, if anything, they learned quite a bit from that.
	They learned about how we'll respond, where our pressure points are, where we stand up.
	If anything, it was a dress rehearsal for what's coming next.
	And so I'm concerned about them, for sure.
	But I'm also... I'm also fairly concerned about us, our response, and how passive the American public have become to a lot of these things where we sort of allowed ourselves to be subjugated.
	And that's very concerning to me because I always was taught when I was growing up that America sort of stands for something.
	And I don't feel like a lot of the population stand for much anymore.
	In fact, they're so busy.
	They're sitting down, linking arms, blocking roads, because they're worried about cow farts destroying the climate and killing everybody.
	So they have to block the 405 freeway.
	You know what I mean? So I'd like to be more optimistic.
	I just don't feel it right now.
	I don't feel this optimism.
	Maybe something will turn. Well, I hope so.
	But we have all these invisible enemies, Charlie.
	Well, yeah, that's true. You can't see the hijackers, but you find their passport in the rubble.
	You can't see that. Then you have viruses that are invisible.
	You can't see it. Trump called it the invisible enemy.
	Then you have climate change, which used to when I was a kid, when you were a kid, it was about cleaning up trash and planting trees.
	Sure. Now, we don't do that anymore, because that would mean that we'd have to, like, look at the Southwest and realize that we're having a, you know, an on-purpose invasion of people that, again, our elites are inviting and sending them debit cards and instruction manuals and Joe Biden and whatever administration, under the Trump administration, our military was used as Sherpas.
	To make sure that they were escorted to the proper facility to be processed and never seen again into the American interior.
	So we have all that because we'd have to clean that up.
	We'd have to clean up that trash.
	It's an ecological disaster in the Southwest.
	Greenpeace won't talk about it.
	It has nothing to do with climate change, which is an abstract, invisible thing.
	You can only get Greta Thunberg.
	You can't talk about, you know, taking the the the island made of plastic and trash from the third world in the ocean.
	You can't talk about getting.
	See, I'm all about clean air and water and all that stuff.
	We don't talk about that.
	We just talk about shutting you down, putting you back into the Stone Age, making sure that you have an electric car so you can't go anywhere because if there's no grid to support your car and they didn't build the grid, then you're not going to be able to charge it and your combustion engine is gone.
	I think that's the whole point.
	That's why you put somebody like a Rhodes Scholar Like Buttigieg or whatever.
	You put him in charge of transportation because you're not going to go anywhere under this Marxian Rhodes Scholar figure.
	And that's what they pick these people.
	And also to make you feel helpless.
	Like he's going to wear his little vest and walk up.
	America looks pathetic.
	But it's really not. It's just that nobody is allowed to get to anywhere that makes any difference if you have any integrity or you're a real person because this is a script.
	We're about to be inundated, Charlie, and your show and my show and everybody's show that's objective is going to suffer because the cult is going to come back and all this 2024 rhetoric and who do you support?
	Do you like DeSantis with his BDS laws with Israel?
	And is a shutdown of bloggers?
	Or do you like Trump, who already was president and locked you down because it's not essential and printed 40% of all the dollars ever made?
	And gave you the shot.
	So which one do you like better?
	And why aren't you on my team?
	And this is going to continue.
	And I think less and less people get captured by the fulcrum of the PSYOP. But it's not enough yet to make a real significant change.
	So it's like when I listen to your show and you talk about just being prepared, it's like, yeah, having a plan, having a bug-out bag, having the ability to garden, start thinking about...
	You know, trading economically with people of like mind.
	It's one of the reasons I set up Wolfpack.gold, and that's what I sponsor in your show.
	I sponsor David's show.
	And we're building a network.
	And it's a work in progress, but it's a network there.
	Like, it's my response to the central bank digital currency.
	It's my response to that totalitarian move, like physical things, trade.
	And we'll even talk about crypto in there, too.
	But there's so much that we need to do because it looks like, you know, you talk about the train wreck.
	Like America is a train, like we train wreck and we have the right now.
	Perfect symbology. It's a perfect symbology.
	And like, you know, the Palestinians in that day was like, oh, the Palestinians get shafted again.
	That's kind of like the way it's been in foreign policy too.
	So I just, um, I think it's more important than ever shows like yours, the deep analysis, having people, I mean, knowledge, um, You know, can be turned into wisdom.
	And you can share that with others.
	Like, just having that research.
	Charlie's doing so much.
	I mean, he's doing God's work. You guys need to go subscribe to his channel.
	Macroaggressions, anywhere podcasts are found.
	The guest list. I know I'm on it.
	I'm biased. But the guest list.
	Magnificent. The work. The research and tell people where they can find you.
	I've got a couple of minutes left, Charlie.
	Yeah. Well, listen, my whole theme is be proactive.
	Make moves now.
	If you're waiting for the herd to tell you when to do this or that, or you're waiting for Rachel Maddow to tell you when to be afraid, it's too late.
	Trust your instincts.
	Trust what you see.
	You see what you see. You know what you see.
	It's not good. You've got money in the banks.
	You have questions about the banks.
	You're right to have questions about the banks.
	Convert some of your soon-to-be worthless federal reserve notes into tangible assets.
	Maybe that's gold and silver through Tony.
	Maybe that's productive farmland.
	Maybe that's owning land with water and water rights.
	Whatever.
	Just start thinking about these things and make a move now and trust your instincts because I think our analysis is correct.
	I think we see where things are going.
	I try to bring on interesting people that can help to point us in the right direction.
	I just interviewed a guy who's a homesteader yesterday.
	He's completely lost his corporate job because he refused to tell his employees to take the vaccine.
	He was fired on the spot and he said, I'm out of here.
	He We're good to go.
	I have a good time doing it.
	It's all right. And I appreciate you, Tony.
	Thank you for having me back on.
	It's always my pleasure to connect with a real thoughtful audience that probably sees the same things I'm seeing out there.
	Sometimes I forget we're even on air.
	We're just talking night. I know, because we have these conversations.
	I'm always talking to the David Knight Show. When we're not recording, we have these same conversations.
	When I get texts from you or phone calls from you, we have the same conversations.
	So we're not hamming it up for the camera, I assure you.
	This is basically like a Thursday for you and me.
	Right. Thank you so much, Charlie.
	I appreciate you being here.
	It was a great segment. Thank you so much.
	See you soon, my friend.
	All right, folks. I think we've got a minute 20 left in the broadcast.
	Well, always an honor to be here.
	Just being able to fill in for David and give him the ability to take a day off and still keep the live feed going.
	I found as a broadcaster it's always helpful to have a live feed over a rebroadcast anytime, so I'm happy to do that.
	And David will be back on Thursday.
	Guard Goldsmith tomorrow here I'll be producing.
	And so you guys get ready.
	So you talk about a great show.
	You've got one in store.
	I'm sure Guard is working around.
	He's probably not even sleeping.
	He's probably just getting articles and links and research, stuff that I can't do.
	He's going to be putting that together.
	So I really look forward to that.
	Let's put up real quick the price of gold.
	1,819 Luciferian Bankster notes per troy ounce on the yellow metal.
	And silver, $20.24 for the white metal.
	That is cheap. You go to davidknight.gold to learn more.
	I'm going to put on the outro theme.
	See if we can find it.
	Here we go. All right.
	I think I missed it by about 10 seconds.
	We sure appreciate each and every one of you.
	Go to thedavidknightshow.com.
	Make sure you support this organization, this show, and the Knight family.
	From Beans the Brave and myself, you guys take care of each other.

▲