Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 27, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:13

The David Knight Show Unabridged - 02/27/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The End Free speech to free minds.
	Soon.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 27th of February.
	Here of our Lord, 2022, 23, day 1082 of the emergency.
	Today we're going to take a look at another aspect of the metastasizing medical dictatorship.
	It looks like they are coming for the food as well with a backdoor technique.
	And of course, we know that food and drugs have always gone together.
	As Hippocrates said, let food be your medicine.
	Well, the FDA was created to merge those things, and now it looks like they're going to be merged through the World Health Organization as well.
	And an interesting pushback against the pharmaceutical cartel by Woody Harrelson.
	A small but valiant effort.
	We'll talk about that when we come back.
	Stay with us.
	Well, I want to begin with Woody Harrelson.
	It was Saturday Night Live, which, you know, who watches that anymore?
	But it was the fifth time that he hosted it.
	Maybe the final time that he hosted it.
	Because the leftist mainstream media had a fit because of what he had to say.
	And I thought it was interesting because his dialogue, or monologue I should say, was about six minutes long.
	Most of it he was making fun of himself as a pothead and all the rest of it, right?
	But the beginning and the very end of it...
	Was what they were upset about.
	And it went over like a lead balloon with the audience as well.
	Here's what he had to say. The last time I did SNL was around Thanksgiving 2019, three years ago.
	And you would not believe what happened after the show.
	The next day was a Sunday, as it always is the day after I do Saturday Night Live.
	It's like a pattern, I noticed.
	Anyway, I went walking in the greatest part of this city, Central Park, leaned against a tree, and started to read the craziest script.
	So the movie goes like this.
	The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes and people can only come out if they take the cartels' drugs and keep taking them over and over.
	I threw the script away.
	I mean, who is going to believe that crazy idea of being forced to do drugs?
	I do that voluntarily all day long.
	Anyway. Yeah, yeah.
	Well, it appears that his audience would believe that.
	They think it was funny.
	And the press did not think that was funny.
	Yeah, even worse, you won't believe what happened, Woody, after 2019.
	It really got crazy.
	It's been going crazy for 1,082 days.
	So that was about a minute.
	A little bit at the beginning, a little bit at the end.
	And in between, you had five minutes of him talking about his recreational use of marijuana and how it's making him stupid or whatever.
	It's kind of a deflecting thing.
	Nobody had a problem with that.
	But they did have a problem when he made his comment about the five biggest drug companies getting together and creating a cartel to force everybody to take their product and to keep taking it over and over again.
	And so you have the Rolling Stone magazine.
	It says, Saturday Night Live host has a history of strange anti-science remarks during the COVID pandemic.
	Let me just say, what kind of an upside-down world are we when we get science advice from Rolling Stone magazine?
	This is, I don't know, this is not anything I would ever thought I would live to see.
	Daily Beast, Woody Harrelson spews anti-vax conspiracies.
	And rambling SNL monologue.
	Huffington Post. Woody Harrelson rambles about weed, anti-vax conspiracy.
	An SNL monologue.
	He kicked off his fifth time hosting the show with a confusing monologue.
	Huffington Post found that confusing.
	Because they still haven't got a clue as to what happened for the last 1,082 days.
	Variety. Woody Harrelson's Saturday Night Live monologue makes COVID conspiracy jokes.
	Again. One minute, less than a minute.
	That whole thing I've played for you is about a minute.
	Less than a minute of his six-minute monologue.
	Only one COVID conspiracy joke.
	And the joke's on the mainstream media because everybody outside of New York City and that mainstream media gets the joke.
	Yeah, it's been a black comedy, hasn't it?
	Uh, SNL is probably the last place we'd expect to see such voices, given a platform, writes Zero Hedge.
	Unless, of course, this was a marketing ploy to try to end the bleeding of viewers who are leaving it and have left it a long time ago.
	And so, as Saturday Night Live posted that on Twitter, uh, the full monologue, Elon Musk replied with just, uh, one emojis, uh, a, um, A target with a bullseye right in the middle of it, right there. 92% of COVID deaths are fully vaccinated, says UK government.
	This was actually put together by UK government data.
	What people did was they just cross-tabulated it in a different way that the UK government had not done.
	They revealed that fully vaccinated people accounted for a staggering 92% of deaths labeled as COVID last year.
	Those who are classified as fully tripled or quadruple deaths The fully vaccinated accounted for 9 in 10 of all COVID 9-11 deaths in England over the past two years.
	And for the entirety of 2022, the fully vaccinated accounted for 92% of COVID data.
	This is based on government data that was then analyzed by the expose.
	They said, for example, in the month of October of 2022, There are only 125 COVID deaths among unvaccinated residents.
	And again, what is a COVID death?
	We played the statistical game for the longest time.
	But they said, however, there were more than 2,100 deaths among those who have had their third dose or their booster shot.
	And that went up significantly from first dose to second dose to third dose.
	Third dose is where it really took off exponentially.
	100 people who had their second dose died with was diagnosed as COVID.
	And again, you know, we have seen people who drove motorcycles in the walls diagnosed as a COVID death.
	But they said we took the figures provided by ONS and have produced a chart showing COVID deaths per month by vax status in England between April 2021 and the end of December 2022.
	a period of 21 months.
	They said, if you go back and look at some of the data in 2021, they talked about that, but they said, but fast forward a year, and we see that COVID deaths had increased by 450% with 1,500 deaths among the vaccinated and only 96 among the unvaccinated.
	Now, why would this be?
	Again, when I look at it, my opinion, and nothing has happened to change my opinion, It has always been that what we're seeing is COVID deaths, again, and COVID cases.
	This goes back to the PCR that is magnified by an absurd amount, magnifying what they're looking for by 1.1 trillion times.
	You can pretty much find that just about anywhere.
	That doesn't mean that it has a sufficient amount if that is something that is even dangerous to your health.
	It doesn't mean that it has a sufficient amount to make you sick.
	Everybody has a certain amount of pretty much anything that you could test for in their system if you magnify it that amount.
	And so the cases don't mean much.
	The deaths don't mean much.
	If you look at somebody who has severe comorbidities and you discount those and you go with the COVID, they do just the opposite.
	If somebody has a vaccine and they look for any kind of comorbidity and blame it on that, they even make up some.
	Well, I think you're depressed or something.
	I think children are depressed.
	That's why we're seeing so many of them die with heart attacks now.
	They're just depressed. So the reality is that more than 15 times the number of people in the population that they tested with COVID, more than 15 times the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated.
	15 times more vaccinated than unvaccinated.
	If you want to look at this as the standard explanation of a virus and immune system, one explanation of that would be that the vaccine doesn't provide any immunity, zero immunity.
	Instead, it attacks your immune system and makes you more vulnerable.
	Meanwhile, anybody who's been around with this particular strain of respiratory illness has now developed a natural immunity to it.
	Instead of having their immune systems weakened.
	And of course, I believe that most of the COVID deaths were because of a malpractice, denying effective treatment, giving very dangerous and ineffective treatment like the ventilators and things like that.
	They would diagnose somebody with their PCR test and then let them die or, you know, accelerate the death with the ventilators and other things like that.
	They said between April the 1st and December the 31st of 2021, there were 17,000 COVID-19 deaths, they said.
	76 and a half percent of them were among the vaccinated.
	23.5% were among the unvaccinated.
	That is higher than the ratio of the vaccinated to the unvaccinated in the general population.
	And when you look at 92%, there is no way that they're anywhere close to 92%.
	And the fact that it goes up exponentially with the number of injections that you have.
	So they said...
	Report notes, 9 in every 10 COVID deaths over the past 21 months come from the fully vaccinated population.
	Therefore, go out and get your vaccine.
	That's exactly what you want.
	How are you liking your corrupt government health care so far?
	This is what we're looking at, is the government really has taken over our healthcare.
	We used to talk about that all the time with the UK. We talked about it with Hillary Clinton.
	Now they have taken over the healthcare.
	They're dictating what you can have, dictating what you cannot have.
	That's taking it over, isn't it?
	We've had a backdoor takeover of the healthcare, and it happened under Trump's watch.
	With his assistance. So we're looking at other forms of medicine now.
	And this is not a bad thing, necessarily.
	They're looking at medieval medicine.
	They said they returned to maggots and leeches in medicine.
	Well, I thought we had been run...
	I thought our medical system was run by maggots and leeches.
	Like Fauci. Is he coming back?
	I don't know. But the maggots and the leeches are.
	And they said that they actually have found with some research that they do have some...
	Positive effects. You know, that may be better than anything coming from the pharmaceutical companies, because the pharmaceutical companies will come out and say, well, you know, this looks like it's got 20 or 30% efficacy.
	Oh, well, you know, approve it.
	And what are the detrimental effects with that?
	Well, we don't care. Just approve it.
	It's not 20 or 30% efficacy.
	Well, it turns out that...
	They began by talking about a doctor who in the 1990s wanted to go out and test whether or not maggots would actually work because they'd been used extensively in the 1800s in the Napoleonic Wars and the Civil War.
	And they said that they had helped to keep down the spread of infection.
	He says, well, you know, we have been using antibiotics and maybe the antibiotics people are developing, you know, because the way that they're using and being overused, that there are strains that are becoming immune to the antibiotics.
	We've all talked about that over and over again.
	So he says, so let's look at some of the Other ways to tackle this, he had to go out and catch the flies himself because nobody was raising them.
	But they are now, they said.
	That's why they wrote this article.
	After treating his first patients with maggots, he was impressed with the results.
	But he struggled to get his initial research papers published.
	He said, publishing the manuscript, one rejection letter told him, they said, publishing this manuscript might be interpreted as an endorsement for a therapy that is ancient.
	So we want to have stuff that's new and improved.
	That's what's always wanted, right?
	Whether you're talking about medicine or floor wax, it's new and improved.
	Yet he said today that same journal probably has two or three articles about maggot therapy every year.
	He says, so what do they do?
	He said they help to fight infection by consuming dead tissue and bacteria.
	Between 2007 and 2019, the number of NHS patients that's in the UK that were treated with maggots increased by 47%.
	And then they have the leeches.
	They've got a farm in Wales that supplies 60,000 medicinal leeches to the NHS. Well, what could you do with a leech?
	I mean, this is based on the theory, and I talk about this all the time, you know, giving George Washington gets a cold.
	Riding around on a horse on a cold day.
	And I guess respiratory disease.
	They bring in the doctors.
	They bled him nearly to death with leeches.
	They gave him mercury.
	And he died. And I've talked about that many times in comparison to what the kind of therapy that's been used during this so-called pandemic.
	But the reality is that the leeches do have some beneficial effect.
	It's one of the reasons why they kept using them.
	You know, if it had absolutely no effect, they wouldn't have used it.
	But even though they had the theory wrong, they could see that it was doing good in some cases.
	They said what the leeches do is they release chemicals that thin the blood and inhibit clotting, meaning that they can prevent tissue death by improving blood circulation in areas where it has slowed.
	And this way they can save limbs from amputation after a nasty accident.
	Well, you know, it might actually be of some use.
	I don't know. For the people having clotting issues because of the vaccine.
	Those are microclots, however, and I don't know that this would help with that.
	And then they talk about honey.
	And, of course, we all know that you can get very powerful medicinal honey.
	It can be very, very expensive to address infection, things like that.
	That's what we used on Scout when he...
	Had the doctor remove pretty much all the skin on his leg, we started using honey on him and got him out of the clutches of the doctor.
	Even during the pandemic, we know that silver is very effective for burn patients who are very susceptible to infections.
	And they're used even in hospitals.
	They use a silver formula.
	But during the pandemic, the New York Attorney General, Letitia James, threatened to shut down and have criminal prosecutions against anybody who put out silver.
	And that was yet another one of these and one of the earliest examples of this pandemic.
	This anti-science, anti-medicine support, the corporate and political agenda was Letitia James.
	Of course, you know, last week I had an excellent, actually maybe it was the week before last, an excellent interview with Liz James who was talking about raw milk and many benefits of that.
	Maybe, you know, we could bring back food as medicine.
	We could have raw milk.
	And raw honey, at a medicinal grade of that, we could have a land flowing with milk and honey that would be treatments for what we have, probably a lot more effective and certainly not dangerous like the pharmaceutical stuff.
	Studies have found that maggots reduce the wound's surface area, produce a healing faster than conventional dressing, and of course, we all know really what can be done with honey in terms of infection.
	But As you look at the new jabs, and RSV is now something they've tried to focus on every year.
	They've tried to push the flu.
	This year, let's talk about RSV, which has always been around.
	They don't try to claim that there is some kind of special strain of this or something that is unique about this.
	But it is something that has popped up.
	More cases because of the isolation for a year or so.
	Younger people who would have had it as an ordinary course of events did not have it because of isolation.
	And now there's a jump in the number of cases.
	So Pfizer jumps in with a vaccine.
	And this headline really kind of surprised me when I saw this on CNN. A rare neurological condition.
	Is, quote, an important potential risk, unquote, of Pfizer's RSV vaccine, says the FDA. Wow.
	They criticized Pfizer's vaccine.
	The FDA and CNN criticized Pfizer's vaccine.
	But they do call it rare.
	Well, this neurological condition is not new.
	And unfortunately, it's not rare either.
	Guillain-Barre syndrome. We've heard this over and over again from the vaccines.
	If you go back to the 1976 swine flu lie and disaster and debacle, as Mike Wallace was exposing the lie about how it started.
	Oh, yeah, look at this. It began with a healthy soldier, so everybody's got to get their vaccines and their shots.
	And of course, he was one of three soldiers that were laid up with flu-like symptoms.
	The other two were allowed to stay there.
	They forced him to go out and drill.
	And as he's drilling, they took him out of the hospital, made him drill.
	He collapses, and his drill sergeant goes over and tries to give him mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.
	The drill sergeant didn't get sick from that.
	As a matter of fact, nobody else there got sick.
	But because he died, because they made him drill while he had severe respiratory illness, they came up with swine flu.
	And then they used the fact that a young soldier died.
	So everybody needs to get this.
	And one of the key people that Mike Wallace talked to was a woman who lost use of her legs, was after a lot of therapy and several years had gotten back partial use of her legs.
	It was Guillain-Barre.
	And we have seen this over and over again.
	I've seen this on an annual basis.
	Many people that I know that have gotten the flu shot.
	I've known personally several people who have gotten Guillain-Barre right after they took the flu shot.
	So this is nothing new. This is essentially another flu shot, the RSV vaccine that's being sold by Pfizer.
	So it is interesting that the FDA and CNN would try to pretend that they are doing due diligence.
	I think that's what's going on here.
	They've never really cared about Guillain-Barre.
	We had many, many Guillain-Barre reports in the VAERS database for the Trump shots, and they were completely silent about that.
	But they're also telling us at the same time, well, you know, this Pfizer vaccine, that's rare, and the Pfizer vaccine is 66.7% effective.
	Really? How did you determine that?
	Because, again, as we've talked about, you know, determining the efficacy and the safety of it, how do you do that with a vaccine?
	They have two different groups, and one of them, they gave a placebo in a double-blind study.
	The other, they gave the RSV vaccine, and then they took them into a room and exposed them to RSV or something.
	No, they never do that with vaccines.
	And what they do is they have their two different control groups, and then they let them mill about the For Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies.
	It can take anywhere from 3 to 10 years to do this.
	So they don't have any data about the efficacy of this.
	Do they do it for 3 years, 10 years?
	No, probably a couple of weeks.
	Just like we've seen before.
	And then GlaxoSmithKline comes out and says, well, our RSV vaccine for older adults was 83.5.
	So there you go. Same thing we saw the week after the election, right?
	As soon as they announced that Biden is the winner, they come out and they say, well, here's the results of our test.
	You know, we're 90% efficacy.
	And then the next day, Russia comes out and says, we're 92%.
	And the next week, you have Moderna come out.
	Oh, we're 94% effective.
	And the next day, Pfizer comes out and says, we're 94.5% effective.
	It's just total nonsense.
	And now, with flu and RSV, you've got doctors at the Frontline Critical Care Alliance are saying, we're seeing good results with ivermectin in terms of treating this if he gets sick.
	And so the Washington Post has a very long story about how this is snake oil, and you should not be even looking at this.
	Look, what they're talking about here is an off-label use.
	And the CDC that they talked to said, CDC has absolutely no power to stop this or to pull medical licenses, and they're very upset about that at the Washington Post.
	Well, they shouldn't have that power.
	What you should know, however, about the CDC is that they're one of the biggest resellers of vaccines anywhere.
	They make a lot of money selling vaccines, and so does the Washington Post, because they're also brought to you by Pfizer.
	All these people are being paid off left and right, just like Woody Harrelson pointed out.
	The group of doctors championing ivermectin as a COVID panacea said, well, it failed to live up to the hype.
	Did it? We got study after study, country after country.
	You can see what was happening with this respiratory illness before they, and then they introduce ivermectin and drops down.
	And then they start vaccinating people, and all of a sudden, man, people are getting sick left and right.
	And we've seen this in country after country after country around the world.
	Talked about that two years ago.
	I'm not going to go back into it for the benefit of the Washington Post.
	You know that if you've been listening.
	There's no clinical data they said in humans to support using ivermectin for flu or RSV. Well, they won't admit that there's any clinical data to show that it works for the other respiratory illness that they say is out there that many people had.
	But, of course, they said benefiting from bunk and nonsense has no place in ethical medicine.
	I would agree. That's why I think we need to get rid of the CDC and the FDA and get the government out of health care altogether.
	And so, they said, but the CDC and medical experts strongly advise against use of these protocols.
	They said, ivermectin is not recommended by the CDC for prevention or treatment of influenza.
	There's no data. Of course, they're not going to do any tests of it.
	Says the biggest seller of vaccines.
	I just want to tell you, hey, this is horse medicine, y'all.
	Stop it. And they lost all credibility with ivermectin, but they continue to do this.
	You can never shame these people.
	And are telling the truth. While the CDC can refute the alliance's claims, the agency does not regulate free speech.
	Really? You believe that?
	Or doctors' licenses.
	They have their ways, don't they?
	I think they do have their way to do all of that.
	By the way, we're talking about Bringing back maggots and leeches.
	It looks like Fauci and his organization, those maggots and leeches there at the NIH and the NIAID, just had a big payday.
	Moderna paid Fauci's organization, the NIAID. He's retired now, but this is probably for services rendered while he was still there.
	$400 million in royalties.
	On the COVID-9-11 vaccine sales.
	There you go. Follow the money.
	Show me the money, Jerry.
	I think we just showed you the money.
	That's what this is all about.
	And then this is what I was talking about at the beginning of the program.
	The WHO, this is an op-ed piece put out by Clark Barnes.
	I think he's right about this.
	The WHO's pandemic accord will give it control over U.S. livestock and food supply.
	Now, the pandemic is dangerous enough in the sense that it presumes to make it legally binding and to give them the new rules as well as a pandemic treaty, to give them the authority to declare a pandemic anywhere, to declare what actions need to be taken in terms of locking people down and all the rest of this stuff.
	But part of this, and he's the first person I've seen to talk about this, part of it is to take preemptive actions Against the food supply.
	And essentially to declare as a health risk, any animals, you know, chickens, cattle, anything, anything that is not vaccinated, then that is a health risk to you.
	Just the opposite. Just the opposite.
	You know, as I said, it was Hippocrates who said, let food be your medicine.
	Well, these people want to use their medical tyranny to take away our food and our ability to have food outside of this cartel that is going to control all of our food.
	That's what they're doing in every regard.
	I mean, it's not just the drugs.
	In everything you look at, whether you're looking at food or transportation or energy, it's all about creating a cartel run by all the same people, the usual suspects, that cartel.
	Same people in all these different cartels taking over control of everything.
	Energy, food, healthcare, transportation, all of it.
	Nobody is talking about how the Accord will give the WHO complete control over agriculture, both wild and domesticated animals, and our food supply.
	Well, how are they going to vaccinate wild animals?
	Well, we talked about spay vac, right?
	We talked about that several times.
	They've been doing that already.
	When they want to reduce the population of animals that they think are out of control, deer in some areas, wild horses in other areas, well, they would grab them and give them a spay vac, which would sterilize them.
	And it had the same delivery mechanisms as the vaccines that they just used on us.
	That's one of the reasons why I think Dr.
	Michael Yadin, who was with Pfizer, sounded the alert on this as being a threat to depopulation, you know, a depopulation threat, sterilization threat to us from the very beginning.
	That was the very first thing he mentioned.
	That was before we started seeing the problems of blood clots and heart attacks and turbo cancer and all the rest of the stuff.
	First thing he said was, this is going to be used for depopulation aspects.
	And so, you know, they were doing, have been doing that for wild animals, and they want to do it for domesticated animals.
	The WHO's incoming chief scientist said on Monday, governments should invest in vaccines for all strains of influenza that exist in the animal kingdom, just to make sure that you don't have an outbreak with humans, right?
	I think this is clearly...
	A power play. I agree with Clark Barnes.
	It'll allow it to use viruses and animals and the threat of a pandemic to take over the U.S. livestock and our food supply, and anybody else's as well, because this is a worldwide strategy.
	It'll be done everywhere. The WHO is already letting us know they're going to start with poultry.
	And you're either going to allow your flocks to be controlled, surveilled, and vaccinated, or they will be killed so that viruses they do not have will not spread to people.
	They're already laying the foundation for this groundwork.
	They're laying it, folks, in the media.
	That's what all this bird flu stuff is about, I believe.
	You know, creating fear and panic about, oh, we could have another animal-born pandemic and virus and everything.
	But I think this is really ultimately what they're trying to do.
	They're trying to give themselves a new business center where every living thing on earth will be vaccinated by Pfizer and Moderna and this drug cartel.
	And not just vaccinated once, but vaccinated over and over and over again.
	As I pointed out a few weeks ago, a veterinarian saying, I refuse to keep giving these rabies shots to animals.
	He said, you got the same dosage of rabies shot For a small cat that weighs a few pounds, as you do for a large dog that's 50 pounds or something like that, or 100 pounds.
	Same amount of dosage.
	And he says you're seeing a lot of tumors at the injection site, turbo cancers and other things.
	He goes, I refuse to do this anymore.
	And yet, look at what they've been able to do with our pets.
	If they've been able to legislate and require...
	That we get, I don't know, what is it?
	Annual rabies shots or something like that?
	Every two years? I don't know what it is.
	I refuse to do that.
	And unfortunately, again, the vet that tried to kill our dog, tried to run up every fee he could think of, did that.
	And he's been sick with allergies and things like that ever since.
	Never been the same. But, you know, gave him that vaccine, any other vaccine he could think of.
	It just... It infuriated me.
	I refused to pay for it, but, you know, the damage had been done.
	But, you know, the other stuff, he just, again, you know, you look at these ruthless, unethical people, whether they are animal doctors or human doctors, We're good to
	go. And we'll sell everything out to make money.
	I think that is the larger, I wouldn't say everybody, because we've had some doctors who have come out and opposed this thing and lost their careers.
	But I think they are teeny, teeny, teeny, teeny, tiny minority.
	You know, so it's not 100%, but it's nearly 100%.
	And that is the motivation of everybody I knew that went in to become a doctor.
	Maybe some of them change after they start treating people.
	But, you know, there are some people go into it for ideological purposes rather than wanting to help people.
	So I wouldn't make it say every single one, but I would say the overwhelming vast majority, nearly 100% of them is what I would say.
	So anyway, what is the World Health Organization trying to do with this?
	Well, here's what the text says.
	By signing onto the accord, a country acknowledges that most emerging infectious diseases originate in animals, including wildlife and domesticated animals, and then spill over into people.
	That's a quote, and he's in this article.
	You'll find this article, by the way, on lewrockwell.com.
	I've never seen Clark with a K. Clark Barnes before.
	There you go. You see it right there.
	And so, Lou Rockwell picked this up.
	You'll find it on his website.
	But I think he's absolutely right.
	Anyway, he goes on. He says, from the outset, they're laying the foundation that, quote, most infectious diseases, unquote, began in animals.
	Thus, their ability to regulate animals is what they have to do.
	That's their purview.
	That's their wheelhouse or whatever.
	Yeah, because we all know that this world's worst pandemic that we've ever seen came from bat soup, right?
	And we'll talk about that shifting narrative.
	Big shift this last week.
	Lots of press, both the conservative alternative media, mainstream media, the Biden administration.
	They're all saying, oh, it came from the lab now.
	We'll talk about what that's about.
	But let's talk about how the World Health Organization wants to use bird flu now.
	Parties must reaffirm the importance of a One Health approach.
	All this means, and this is their term, One Health, One Health.
	Well, that means it's going to be a singular approach worldwide to anything.
	You will do exactly what they say and nothing but what they say.
	This will be disastrous for any remaining science that's left in medicine.
	You're going to have this dictated by politicians like Tedros, who runs the World Health Organization.
	So you're going to have health care dictated by politicians.
	And it will be the same approach everywhere.
	And that's going to be the approach that they say, for whatever reason they say.
	It isn't going to be based on science whatsoever.
	It isn't based on any concern about efficacy or the health of the patients.
	There's no concern about first doing no harm.
	None of that. So...
	It's going to be a single global approach to every health aspect.
	Just what we saw that failed so badly for the last three years.
	A whole of government and a whole of society approach to control zoonotic outbreaks.
	In other words, the idea that this is coming from the bat or it's coming from, what are they, the pangolins and all kinds of stuff.
	Every week, it was like, oh, I think it was this animal that it came from.
	Including engagement of communities and surveillance that identifies zoonotic outbreaks and antimicrobial resistance at the source.
	And of course to take it down preemptively.
	The sections that follow discuss how parties must enhance surveillance to identify and to report pathogens and strengthen infection prevention and control in health care settings and sanitation and biosecurity in livestock forms.
	You understand that?
	The World Health Organization is not just giving itself the power at the behest and the assistance of the Biden administration.
	They're not just giving themselves the power to, you know, suss out A pandemic anywhere and shut everybody down, as we did 1,082 days ago, before there was any observable effect here in the U.S. You already had the Trump administration locking us down.
	But they want to be able to do that anywhere in the world.
	They will determine it.
	And that's bad enough.
	But now this aspect that they want to have sanitation and biosecurity in livestock forms.
	Biosecurity and livestock farms is going to be the way they come after food.
	Isn't it interesting that they're coming after farms with both MacGuffins at the same time?
	We got a double barrel MacGuffin attack on our farms.
	We got the climate MacGuffin and we got the pandemic MacGuffin and they got both barrels aimed at the farms because that's our food.
	This is about sanctions and starvation.
	This is about corrupting our food supply.
	That's how they're going to control us.
	And so how is this going to work?
	Well, when I was talking to Liz James about raw milk, it reminded me of an interview that I had several years ago.
	With a guy who was a veteran, and I forget all the different things that he'd done, but he decided that he wanted to have a farm life, that that would be the best thing for his family.
	Very much a family man, a Christian man who wanted to homeschool his kids, teach them real skills, teach them survival skills, all the great motivations to do this, so they start their farm, and he had a lot to learn.
	He worked real hard at it, and he started setting up, had kind of a farm-to-table approach, so he would let people come in and eat at the farm, but he was also giving classes to people.
	Online and otherwise. Well, he got their attention.
	He brought in, as part of this, he thought, well, let me do pigs in a different way.
	He brought in some foreign pigs, and they were not feral.
	They were not something that was going to be a threat to anybody.
	He said they had hair instead of the hairless pigs that you typically have raised in factory settings here in the U.S.
	But they were a northern European strain of pigs, and he was breeding them and keeping them.
	He said the meat was not white.
	It was red.
	It had a really rich taste to it.
	It was like meat rather than like pork.
	But by definition, they had to be hairless, or the Michigan Department of Agriculture would label them as feral pigs.
	And so they came in to destroy his pigs and he got into a big legal fight with them.
	And I talked to him in the midst of that legal fight.
	And so they can arbitrarily label anything, whatever they want.
	And if they come up with the idea, if they encapsulate this in law, that you're going to have biosecurity and livestock, what that means is that they're going to mandate vaccines for all the livestock, just like they mandate it for pets now.
	And if you don't follow their recommendations, they will come in and destroy all the livestock.
	In the same way that if you build a building and you don't get their approval for the building code, the building permits and the rest of the stuff like that, they'll come in and knock your building down, regardless of how well built it is.
	They're not going to give you a fine. They'll just destroy everything.
	And that's what they'll do. They'll destroy the entire farm if you don't preemptively vaccinate your animals against everything they can imagine might ever come along, whether or not that vaccine is safe or effective.
	So, in light of all this, Alex Berenson said, well, here's a good news story about the bird flu.
	He said, people who brought you COVID are really hoping to make bird flu a thing.
	I don't think that Alex Berenson sees the bigger picture.
	And quite frankly, I hadn't seen it either until Clark Barnes pointed it out.
	Scarce stories, he said, about a potential epidemic of bird flu have taken off this week with the New York Times asking if we're ready for back-to-back pandemics.
	See, this is the media that is pushing this.
	And the media is not pushing it just because they want to keep you scared and fearful.
	That is always a part of it.
	But they're also pushing it and ramping up this whole bird flu thing because they want to create a consensus of, you know, a public opinion, a push public opinion so that they'll support the World Health Organization where the World Health Organization comes out and says, well, we're going to have to preemptively do this.
	Let's see, if we had vaccinated all these birds, none of them would have died, which is a lie.
	It's assuming that their vaccines are effective.
	Assuming that they know which strain of flu they're going to vaccinate for.
	This is the same issue that they've had with human flu vaccines every year.
	They pick a strain of flu and they vaccinate the animals for it.
	And it's like, well, how did you know that was going to be it?
	Well, you didn't know. And so it's going to be totally ineffective.
	But they'll use this story.
	The New York Times, the mainstream media will use this cover story.
	Well, you saw what happened to the price of eggs, and that was all about the bird flu.
	Well, no, it wasn't, as I pointed out.
	Many of the farmers pointed out that that was not the real issue.
	That the number of eggs really hadn't changed because of bird flu.
	They said, yeah, you had some large areas where they culled massive numbers of birds, but they said the other birds actually had higher production this year.
	And there's absolutely nothing to support the increase in egg prices.
	But, of course, the increase in egg prices, which everybody was talking about, the bird flu, which the New York Times and other people are still talking about, that will be used to build a consensus for people to support the World Health Organization vaccinating all animals to, quote-unquote, protect our food supply, when what it will be doing is corrupting our food supply.
	He says, worst of all, you have Neil Ferguson now making predictions about bird flu.
	Ferguson is the British epidemiologist, you should put that in air quotes, epidemiologist, who helped to stampede the world into lockdowns in 2020 with dire predictions of COVID patients overrunning hospitals.
	The rules, however, did not apply to him, if you remember, because he was later caught violating all of these absurd social distancing things in an affair that he had with his married girlfriend, meeting her secretly when he had put out the rules saying no one will, you know, get outside their social bubble.
	I guess she got outside her social bubble.
	Anyway, this time around, Ferguson thinks lots of people could die from bird flu or maybe almost nobody.
	It just depends. But that's no reason not to be scared.
	Be afraid. Be very afraid, he says.
	In case you're wondering, the bird flu strain is not new.
	Scientists first found it in Scotland in 1959.
	It probably existed long before that.
	And yes, it can be highly lethal to birds and to any humans who are unlucky enough to be infected with it.
	But it has never spread between humans.
	And the lack of human-to-human transmission is not a coincidence.
	And so he talks about some genetic quirks in it, which really don't matter.
	You have to understand what we're talking about here is not science.
	And this is what Alec Berenson and so many people make the mistake of.
	I'm glad for what he's saying here.
	And he's put out some very important information.
	But ultimately, you've got to understand that these pandemics are not about disease.
	And climate change is not about climate change.
	It's not about the weather or the climate.
	These are MacGuffins that are being used for their political purposes.
	This is simply political.
	He says, so what's really going on?
	Why the sudden interest in bird flu?
	How do I put it politely? He said, the most likely explanation is more economic...
	Then biological. COVID supercharged spending on virology, epidemiology, immunology.
	A lot of people, and not just in the United States, he said, made a lot of money on that gravy train, including all the governors who got billions and tens of billions of dollars from Trump.
	And Biden. But all good epidemics must come to an end, even in countries that are foolish enough to use the mRNA vaccines.
	He says, well, let's hope so anyway.
	Yeah, I don't know. It hasn't come to an end.
	See, all the legal political aspects of it are all still there.
	They're just put on pause for enforcement.
	He says COVID is no exception.
	So what's a good epidemiologist to do right now?
	He says, well, you start by releasing the chickens.
	And then that brings us to this lab leak story and how this has changed again.
	I first talked about this in mid-December of 2019.
	And as stories were surfacing in China about this, and at that point in time, there was no talk.
	About lockdowns, lockdowns until vaccine, all the rest of the stuff, which was a dead giveaway going back to dark winter and all the germ games that they've been practicing for the last 20 years.
	But at that point in time, it was like, oh, look at this.
	We're panicking about this.
	And I said, well, do you realize, as ridiculous as this bat soup story is, do you realize that right there at that wet market is the only biosafety level four lab in China, in all of China?
	And so, after about a month or so, Zero Hedge got purged off of social media, off of Twitter, because they published a LinkedIn profile, something that was publicly available.
	About a scientist who was working there at that Biosafety Level 4 lab in Wuhan, who was doing research on bats and on the SARS virus and combining them and so forth.
	And they shut him down, gagged him about that.
	And so that was important to understand.
	And, you know, of course, they got real manic about that.
	And then gradually they've now, over the last few months, started to walk that back.
	And now you have the Biden administration, the energy department, is saying, yeah, it did come from the lab.
	We believe that's what happened.
	That's the most likely story with it.
	The problem is that in early 2020, you know, in January, as they started talking about locking people down, and as we were seeing them lock people down in China, and as we saw the phony, obviously phony falls, Of people taking a dive, young people walking along, falling over.
	It was like a really fake silent film, somebody pretending to be shot and dying.
	I said, no, this stuff is fake.
	They're up to something, and I think I know what it is.
	If they're going to lock everybody down until they can get a vaccine, it's exactly the scenario they've been practicing for 20 years in the U.S. And so...
	At that point, I said, look, whatever this is, the worst thing that we could do is to follow these lockdown and vaccine things because that is a particular agenda that they're trying to do to us.
	And it will cripple us.
	In terms of food, medicine, and every other way to respond to this if we lock everybody down.
	And you remember, they didn't want to do that with Ebola.
	So I was saying all of this stuff, but it was pedal to the metal for Mike Adams and Alex Jones because they could make a lot of money pushing panic with people.
	And so why are they doing this now?
	Well, I think for the same reason.
	I think they want to panic people.
	And I think there's also another aspect to this.
	We have to start building more and more animosity towards China because they want to take us to war with China.
	I mean, look what they did with this spy balloon thing.
	And so I think this has more to do with the spy balloon mentality than anything else.
	And I think they have ramped this thing up.
	Look, all of this is a distraction.
	And I criticize Rand Paul as well for focusing on this with Fauci.
	Don't focus on the supposed virus and pandemic.
	Focus on the Trump shots.
	They are the bioweapon.
	Stop that. We have absolutely no risk.
	Why are we talking about when we know that even the people who've been selling you this COVID-9-11, Full, you know, fire alarm nonsense for the last 1,082 days.
	Even they tell you, well, it's no longer a threat to us.
	But something else may come along.
	We might get bird flu or we might get this.
	And we've got to give all this power to the World Health Organization.
	Not even they say that this is dangerous anymore.
	They're not trying to rig the statistics with cases or case fatality rates or the rest of the stuff anymore.
	So why are we talking about it?
	Why is the Wall Street Journal talking about this?
	Why is Breitbart focused on it?
	Why is everybody focused on this?
	Well, you know, some of these outlets like to say, well, I told you it was coming from the lab all along.
	So see, I was right all along.
	You misdirected people from the true risk all along.
	That's what you did. You participated in the fear and the panic and the misdirection, and you prepared the public to put on the chains that we still don't have taken off of us.
	That's what you did.
	You weren't right about the lab leak.
	You weren't right about any of that stuff.
	So you've got some people who are pushing this because, see, it shows that we were right.
	Other people are pushing this because they want to use China as a villain.
	Or because they want to continue to push fear so they can keep all of these pandemic rules in?
	We, at this point in time, ought to be taking these shackles off.
	We ought to go through line by line in every state legislature.
	And so remember that Model State Health Emergency Powers Act they put out two months after the false flag anthrax attack?
	Two months after the dark winter simulation?
	Remember that legislation?
	Well, you enacted this, this, this, and this.
	Repeal those right now. That's what we should be saying.
	We should be saying, get rid of the emergency executive orders, state and federal.
	Get rid of the Model State Health legislation, any of that stuff.
	Take the powers away from these people.
	Put new laws in that constrict what they can do.
	And make sure they never enact medical martial law again on us.
	That's what we should be doing. Instead, what are we doing?
	We're focusing on, oh, well, look, gain of function.
	And it was a lab leak and all the rest of the stuff.
	And here's the big tell. Here's the really big tell for the Wall Street Journal and for all these news organizations, including places like Breitbart.
	They don't talk about, well, if this was a lab leak, then the obvious thing to do would be to stop this dangerous, risky experimentation, to ban it at least.
	I know that's not going to stop everything if you ban it.
	I'm not naive enough to think that prohibition can accomplish, but you could at least try to slow it down.
	By using full-on prohibition.
	Nobody's even talking about that.
	If you say that this came from a lab leak and you don't want to shut down gain-of-function research, then shut up.
	You're part of the problem. You're gaslighting people.
	You're just putting out fear.
	And that's the reality of this.
	They say this is the problem, but they don't want a solution to that problem.
	Instead, they want to use that as fear to impose more tyranny, more medical martial law, and keep in place everything that they have done to us.
	That's the reality of what is happening with this.
	They don't want to shut down anything.
	They want us to live in fear.
	They want to ramp up and continue.
	They want to keep what they've got in terms of medical dictatorship, and they want to expand it.
	And then they also want to build animosity towards China because they want to take us to war with China.
	So when we look at the dark side of this martial law and vigilantism, take a look at what's going on in Ukraine.
	Thank you.
	Right? Now that you have not as much censorship on some of the stuff that was on Twitter, in terms of content that would have normally just been shut down, you're starting to see videos of public humiliation, public torture in Ukraine that is being conducted by the government, by the army there, against individuals that they allege are their enemies.
	There's no due process.
	There is no trial or anything like that.
	And look, you know, in terms of public humiliation, that was something that at the time of the founding of this country, if you ever go to...
	Colonial Williamsburg. You'll see the little courthouse there.
	You did get a speedy trial, but you got a trial.
	If they found you guilty of some of these things, they had some stocks there that they would put you in.
	And that was public humiliation.
	But it was following a trial.
	This is following an allegation, and that makes all the difference in the world.
	There are videos now on Twitter featuring what appear to be Ukrainian soldiers and others wearing identifying armbands involved in these attacks.
	It's hard to say what crimes the victims supposedly committed.
	Ukraine media defends the actions comparing them to, quote, hanging a shoplifter photo on a wall of shame.
	Except you do that after a verdict with due process, not with just accusations of this.
	And so what you're seeing is trapping people to street signs, to lampposts, gagging them, sometimes stripping them of their clothes and beating them.
	This kind of public humiliation.
	One of the pictures in this article, you may pull this up, Ukrainian soldier is standing there and they've got an 11-year-old girl That they have taped to a poll.
	And to humiliate her, this is the country that we support in Ukraine.
	And of course we do.
	Because if they could get away with it, they'd be doing the same thing here in the United States.
	It's just a matter of time before they do.
	You have public humiliation on social media.
	You have people who are vilified and who are purged from society, purged from the banking system.
	Because they don't like your politics?
	Purge from the banking system because they don't like you selling ammunition, for example.
	Whether or not an individual deserves this kind of treatment is a separate debate, frankly, but this is what due process is supposed to achieve, says Zero Hedge.
	Fair justice rather than spontaneous punishment.
	Without it, we'll never know if corporal actions are meant to prevent crime or if they're just meant to oppress and terrorize.
	The point is, Ukraine has abandoned all due process for the sake of expedience at best, or they've done it for the sake of tyranny at worst.
	And I mention that because that is the next level of what is happening with this cancel culture.
	But again, when we look at people being canceled and the fear that is being imposed on people, this totalitarian fear to live by the lie because you know that everything is going to be taken away from you, there was an article by Wayne Allen Root, headline, Hey, Damar Hamlin, were you vaxxed and boosted?
	Because you've seen what happened.
	This is the player who collapsed on field, and everybody was kneeling around him and praying and weeping, and fortunately he survived, but then they asked him a question, you know, so what was it that happened to you?
	And he's like a deer in the headlight for a moment, and then he comes back, I can't talk about that.
	Well, why can't you talk about that?
	Everybody wants to know. Everybody's been praying for you.
	Everybody's been concerned about you.
	Why won't you talk about that?
	And I think we all know what happened.
	Wayne Allen Root says, yeah, we all know.
	He says, I've compiled perhaps the most detailed, comprehensive list of data from across the globe that shows death rates have skyrocketed since the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine.
	Well, I don't think so. I've seen people who have done a far better job of it.
	Vaccineimpact.com, far better job of cataloging all this stuff.
	And far more consistent and far more and better able to connect the dots.
	Because here's what the problem is.
	Wayne Allen Root, and I've called him out before, he talks about the vaccine and how horrible it is, and that's what this whole piece is about.
	And yet, he will put it, couch it in terms and say, but I still support President Trump.
	It was horrible. One of the worst things that ever happened.
	But I still support President Trump.
	Why? How? How could you still support President Trump with all this stuff?
	You know, I said it last Friday in the context of Paul Alexander, another person who spends all of his time talking about the adverse effects, the horrific adverse effects of this bioweapon, the Trump shot, the genetic code injection.
	He spends all of his time talking about that, and then all of a sudden a post pops up, and he's got that picture of Trump mugging and hugging the American flag.
	I saw that and it's like, unsubscribe.
	I'm not interested in what this guy's got to say.
	I'm sorry. They probably got some good information there with medical stuff, but other people figured that out.
	And if he doesn't know this is political, and he doesn't understand who did it to us, Then he is worse than clueless.
	And I would say the same thing about Wayne Allen Root.
	He says, enter the Damar Hamlin story.
	He said, actually, it's more than a story.
	It's a miracle. But it's also a sin.
	Because it could have been and should have been what former President Obama called a teachable moment.
	He didn't come up with that.
	It was a teachable moment.
	We talk about that all the time in child raising for 30 years anyway.
	Hamlin could have used his 15 minutes of fame to save millions of lives.
	He's right. His testimony could have destroyed the lies and the propaganda of the vaccine scam once and for all.
	But the question is, I would say to Wayne Allyn Root, Is Daymar any different than what Wayne Allen Root is doing?
	Because he has the opportunity to get to the point of all of this.
	And say, here's the foundation for this horrible thing.
	Yes, it's horrible. But here's the foundation.
	The foundation rests in laws that violate the Constitution.
	The foundation rests in emergency orders.
	The foundation rests in massive amounts, trillions of dollars, to give financial incentives for people to do all this stuff.
	You have to understand the foundation for this and the legal prevarications that were used for this.
	And you have to understand who did it.
	This is not a partisan issue.
	This is a bipartisan crime.
	The Democrats and Republicans have their hands filthy in all this murder and destruction.
	So he likes to focus on the Trump shot.
	The Trump shot is the penultimate thing.
	Trump It was the ultimate thing.
	Trump was the one who produced it, right?
	He focuses one level below where the problem really is.
	Just like these people who want to focus now, again, back on the lab leak.
	It's a misdirection to keep you from looking at the real problem.
	The lab leak is to keep you from looking at the real problem of the vaccine.
	And then some people will focus on the vaccine and not on the father of the vaccine, as Trump referred to himself.
	And he bragged about that, being the father of the vaccine, until he began his new campaign.
	And now he's been surprisingly quiet about that.
	Anyway, getting back to what Wayne Allen Root says about Daymar.
	Daymar Hamlin is now a celebrity.
	But he chose silence.
	Why do I think that Hamlin is vaccinated?
	Well, the NFL boasts that 95% of players are vaccinated as well as 100% of coaches and personnel.
	Since Hamlin almost died on that field in January, I've spoken to several current and former NFL players.
	They all believe Hamlin's heart attack was a vaccine injury, and they're all scared to death.
	They feel like walking time bombs, but they're all afraid to speak publicly, just like Wayne Allen Root is afraid to speak publicly about this other time bomb, Donald Trump.
	You see, they're looking at this.
	They're scared to death. And I said this from the very beginning.
	I said, I've seen many football players injured, severely injured.
	I've never seen the response from both teams gathered around crying because they know what this is about.
	And they know that it's a time bomb for them.
	And they're scared to death.
	But even though they're afraid this is going to kill them, They're afraid to speak up.
	If they were to speak up, we could recognize this and we could start working on ways to try to stop and to ameliorate this ongoing production of the spike.
	They need help.
	They need treatment. And they can't get it because they won't speak about the problem.
	Just take a look at what's happened with Ron Johnson as he would hold these hearings.
	People talking about how they had been injured.
	People talking about family members who had died.
	You've got to talk about that before you can do anything about it.
	This is why I said, you know, I was one of the people, my immediate reaction to the Atlantic, when they said, can we just have amnesty now?
	I said, yeah. Yeah, after all they've done, they want amnesty.
	And yet the reality is that's probably the best thing we could do if we have the truth.
	No amnesty without truth.
	A truth and reconciliation thing.
	I know it's horrible to let people get away with it, but you have to stop the killing.
	That's why it was a good thing in South Africa.
	Even though it let Marxist terrorists get away with murder, At least people can see what was happening, and it's far more appropriate for this, because this is a stealth poisoning that continues to go on.
	It's not like you go into an area and you shoot people up.
	You know, Donald Trump has said for the longest time, hey, you know, my people, my people love me.
	And, you know, they will, I could shoot somebody in the middle of Fifth Avenue, and they would still love me.
	And, you know, he shot people all over the world.
	He is the poisoner in chief.
	We have to have the truth about this.
	We have to have the truth about our corrupt politicians, including Trump, not just Fauci.
	We have to have the truth about these corrupt organizations.
	We have to have the truth about these murdering corporations and the money that was involved, the lies that were told to us by them and by the media.
	We have to have the truth about that to stop it, because that's the only way we're going to fight it, is with truth, at the cost of that.
	It's letting some of these people escape imprisonment or worse.
	That is a price that we should be willing to have there.
	But the worst part about this, like I said, even the players who look at this as they've been poisoned and it's a ticking time bomb, Russian roulette, whatever analogy you want to, they're still afraid to talk about it.
	If they would talk about it, they could perhaps get some help.
	But by remaining silent, they will get no help.
	And more and more people will continue to be poisoned about this.
	And the same thing applies to Wayne Allen Root for the same reasons.
	They're afraid to talk about it.
	Damar Hamlin is afraid to talk about it because it means their money.
	Their career. And that's why Wayne Allen Root is afraid to talk about Trump.
	He's afraid to talk about his shots, his executive orders.
	He's afraid to talk about his gun control by executive order.
	So, he says, Tamlin's testimony could have badly damaged Big Pharma.
	Well, that's true. But you have a chance as a writer to expose this, and you're doing a limited hangout.
	He says, I believe this vaccine is a killer, a heart attack machine.
	Something is wrong. World-class 24-year-old athletes don't have massive heart attacks.
	Damar Hamlin's silence speaks volumes.
	We all know what's happening.
	I just wish Hamlin had the courage to speak the truth.
	He could have ended this madness once and for all.
	He could have gone from hero to legend.
	I wish Wayne Allen Root would go from...
	Hero in his own mind to legend.
	I wish he would have the courage to oppose Donald Trump so he could put this corruption to an end.
	But I don't think so.
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	All right, let's talk about what's going on with another attack, and that is the war.
	It's very interesting that last week, and it was kind of buried in the middle of his speech, an amazing admission from the NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, he openly said that the war didn't begin in 2022, a year ago. It actually began in...
	2014. The NATO defense ministers will meet at the critical time for our security.
	Next week we mark...
	The first year of the terrible war in Ukraine, the full-fledged invasion by Russia against Ukraine.
	The war didn't start in February last year.
	The war started in 2014.
	And since 2014, NATO allies have provided support to Ukraine with training, with equipment, so the Ukrainian armed forces were much stronger in 2022 than they were in 2014.
	As a matter of fact, I've pointed out in the past, I've played clips of people saying, yeah, we've been giving them aid since 2014, and we don't know where this military stuff is going.
	We don't have any, it's just disappearing, sprouting legs and walking off.
	As people were saying, what's happening with this?
	Well, that's been a problem since 2014.
	We started this.
	And it was the coup that started it.
	As LifeSite News says, well, also this week, Donald Trump indirectly indicated by naming U.S. Secretary of State Ukraine plotter Victoria Nuland that the Ukraine conflict started in 2014.
	Well, of course, we all know that.
	And when did Trump become president?
	Well, he was sworn in in 2017.
	At that point, it had been going on for three years.
	But Trump didn't do anything to stop it at that point in time.
	Why not? And especially if you understood how the U.S. was involved in that.
	From the very beginning, you know, when you had all of this stuff about Russia, Russia, Russia, and Russiagate, the false information that was being put out to take Trump down, I pointed out and said it over and over again.
	And it was absolutely puzzling why Trump would not defend himself.
	Because we talked to people from Ukraine.
	I had interviews of people from Ukraine who saw members of the DNC coming there, talking about how they could manipulate the election.
	People like Alexandria Chalupa and others.
	And you see the number of smoking guns about what was really going on.
	I mean, all of this stuff about Trump and Russia.
	Was a projection by the Democrats for what they were doing with Ukraine to manipulate our elections and the deep relationship and corruption that they had.
	So all this stuff was, you know, but Trump was not willing or able to defend himself by going on the attack against Ukraine.
	What would have happened if Trump had pointed out The corruption of the Obama administration had tried to intervene there and create a peace process.
	Of course, that's not going to happen under Trump.
	He's just going to be passively sitting there taking whatever is coming along.
	But again, that was well known.
	The documentary by Oliver Stone, Ukraine on Fire, that was done in 2016.
	Again, all this was done even before Trump became president.
	May of last year, there was a follow-up interview with Oliver Stone after Russia had entered Ukraine about two months or so after that.
	There was an interview bringing back up that documentary from six years earlier.
	Oliver Stone started talking about the Civil War and the coup and everything as soon as it happened.
	And so the documentary was released two years after it happened.
	So six years after the release of the documentary, the interview, in the interview, Stone mentions the frequent accusations that anyone who questions the Western response to Ukraine is subjected to.
	He says, quote, I've never seen such a wall of propaganda as I've been seeing on this.
	He says, NATO nations don't have the freedom to say what they want to say on these things.
	The U.S. controls everyone with its heavy financial pressures.
	Well, he's absolutely right.
	But again, you know, that's one of the things that, well, you know, Trump is going to save us from the Ukraine war.
	Did he? You know, for the four years that he was there, coming in three years after it started, did he do anything about that?
	No, he let that dumpster fire.
	Percolate, and then he created a dumpster fire in our own country in the final year.
	And he added another level of corruption with the lockdown elections.
	I've got to say, at least now with that, the only good thing about that is that I don't know anybody who believes that elections are legit.
	I try to wake people up about the electronic voting machines for the longest time.
	And they're probably worse than this ballot harvesting stuff.
	But, of course, Trump has said, no, we're going to embrace ballot harvesting, as a good conservative would.
	You take whatever the left does, even if it's a criminal action, even if it's a violation of the Constitution with a new program or whatever.
	But, of course, you take this criminal...
	Ballot harvesting and the rest of the stuff and say, we'll do it and we'll do a better job than they do.
	That's his approach. And it should be a reproach.
	Stone says, Ukraine was neutral before 2014.
	Death squads were out there to crush dissenters from Ukrainian government policies, he said.
	Zelensky was elected on a peace platform.
	How many times have I said that?
	He did not even try to make peace with Russia.
	As a matter of fact, you know, it was that interview.
	In 2019, with the guy who was his representative at the Peace Forum, Arrestovich, and he said to the Ukrainian news reporter, no, there isn't going to be any peace.
	Oh, that's horrible. Oh, no, it's going to get worse.
	The entire country, he said, is going to be havoced.
	In other words, devastated.
	That's horrible. Can't anything be done?
	No, no, that's actually a good thing because we get into NATO. There's a very hostile attitude towards Russia from the hardcore groups in Ukraine who threatened Zelensky.
	Stone says 14,000 Ukrainian civilians were killed from 2014 onward by Ukrainian Azovs and other military and death squads.
	That's exactly right, but we want to ally ourselves with them.
	Elon Musk, over the weekend, dubbed the 2014 Ukraine regime change a coup.
	Who knew? This is not anything, there's no question, he said.
	Yeah, it hasn't been a question.
	This is not controversial.
	It's a historical fact.
	Everybody knows it was a coup. We talked about this, again, because when it happened back in 2014, why are we doing a coup here?
	Well, now we know why. The front page of an article by University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer, titled, Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault.
	That was tweeted out. And then in response to that, Elon Musk says, no question.
	So again, who started it?
	Who will end it? That should be the question.
	Why are there no peace talks?
	Why have there not been any peace talks even before the Democrats came into power?
	Why were there no negotiations to try to minimize the damage of this?
	You know, Trump made all of this noise about, we've got to get out of NATO. And he was putting it out there, not because NATO was on a relentless push to go into Russia and destroy Russia and start the Third World War.
	He was talking about it because, well, we're paying too much.
	We're shouldering the whole burden of NATO. Well, yeah, but that's not as big an issue as World War III. And he completely avoided what was going on in Ukraine, even as they were taking that and applying it to him in their own spin with Russia.
	But as we look at this from Elon Musk, is he going to tell us the truth, really, about what's going on there?
	When Europe applies their new rule in about a month or two?
	What Elon Musk is not telling you about the EU's Twitter censorship.
	And this is being written, I've seen several articles now coming out of the UK saying, look, he's released the Twitter files showing how the US government is involved in Twitter censorship.
	We know this is happening in the EU and the UK and all the rest of this stuff.
	Where are the Twitter files about the EU and about the UK? And in the dailyskeptic.org, they list monthly emails.
	Talking about fighting COVID misinformation.
	They have links to monthly reports fighting COVID-19 disinformation from August of 2020 all the way up through March and April 2022.
	Now the writer says, I didn't have to hack into the intranet of the U.S. government to find them.
	All I had to do was look at a public website of the European Commission.
	For the government in question is not, after all, the U.S. government, but the European Commission.
	So why the silence about what is happening in Europe on Twitter?
	You know, Musk will talk about what is happening in the United States, but he's looking at the regulation that is coming out of the EU, and he's handling that with kid gloves.
	Meanwhile, the UN is calling for an investigation of the digital blacklist.
	This is the site that has been putting up pictures of opposition politicians in Ukraine, as well as people who are, in fact, enemy combatants, you know, Russian soldiers or whatever, but also journalists.
	And foreign celebrities who speak out against the war.
	The independent Ukrainian website, and I'm probably not pronouncing this correctly, Myrotvorets, resurfaced.
	It's M-Y-R-O-T-V-O-R-E-T-S.
	It's resurfaced in recent news because the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights called it out.
	It is a public platform that displays the personal information of thousands of people who, according to the site's creators, are enemies of Ukraine.
	Many of these individuals are enemy combatants, separatists, Russian soldiers.
	However, the list also includes journalists.
	It includes people who are well-known politicians, but in opposition to Zelensky's party.
	He's jailed his opposition.
	He's done that many times.
	It also includes people like Roger Waters, former bassist for Pink Floyd, who is an outspoken critic of the war.
	The website is Ukrainian for Peacekeeper.
	They put waters on their list of people who spread anti-Ukrainian propaganda.
	Critics have referred to it as a kill list.
	Several people on it have been killed, like Alexander Dugin's daughter, Daria Dugin.
	Dugina is the name that she had, Dugina.
	His name is Dugin. Anyway, some of the people on the list have been assassinated.
	The website says that it is hosted...
	In Poland, in Warsaw, Poland, and in Langley, Virginia.
	Let's see, who else is in Langley?
	Oh, yeah, that's right, the CIA. Now, the Daily Dot says, well, we don't know.
	That's the CIA? It's just a coincidence.
	Yeah, a lot of people who live in Langley, Virginia...
	And they're not all CIA. Well, that's true.
	But when you have something like this, I don't really know why they are trying to downplay this and pretend that there is no connection there.
	Because this has got CIA's fingerprints all over it.
	I think we've got an Occam's razor scenario going on here.
	Exactly. Yeah, the elephant in the room.
	It's kind of like that picture of Biden sitting in these fancy chairs with Zelensky meeting with him.
	And this giant elephant in the room, and it says, Palestine, Ohio, written on the elephant.
	Yeah, there's a big elephant here for the Daily Dot.
	Maybe they don't understand.
	I like the way that Babylon Bee reported it.
	President Biden arrives in Kiev for his performance review.
	The president has been working really hard over the past year, said a White House spokesperson, to do a good job for his superiors, and he's wanting it to pay off for him in his performance review.
	His commitment to working for Ukraine, sending all the weapons, the military equipment, and taxpayer dollars, really speaks for itself.
	If the performance review goes well, it's reported that President Biden is hoping it will result in a bump in his pay, with sources saying Biden wants a raise of at least 10% for the big guy.
	At publishing time, Biden was telling his advisors that once his meeting in Kiev was finished, he wants Air Force One to fly to the Middle East, since he's been hearing something is going on in eastern Palestine or something.
	No money or celebrity for them there, right?
	We have, and I just about fell out of my chair when I saw this.
	This is Al Mohler again, and I talked about Al Mohler and the vaccine wars of 2020.
	Watch it, 2021.
	He came out and he went right down the list.
	of all the talking points that were war-gamed by Yale in their NIH published study about how you convince people to take a vaccine that's not tested.
	And Al Mohler went through and parroted every single one of those.
	Well, you've got to do it to love your neighbor.
	This is a miracle.
	It's science. This is the best thing, said Al Mohler, that we've had since the moonshot.
	Sometimes, you know, science just comes up with these miraculous things, and it would be criminal not to do, not to use.
	It had absolutely no moral qualms about how it was produced or tested.
	Had absolutely no concerns about the vaccine passport and all the rest of this stuff.
	Totally clueless about all of that.
	Moving the Overton window towards some kind of a global ID. He didn't see any problems with that.
	And of course, no concerns about the harm that it would cause people taking an untested vaccine.
	And so now he's back.
	This is not satire.
	This is not the Babylon Bee.
	Biden being in Ukraine.
	Mueller is applauding Biden's visit to Ukraine.
	He says he planted a flag for, quote, freedom over oppression, unquote.
	That's Al Mueller. Al Mueller, by the way, if you don't know, is a Southern Baptist Theological Seminary president.
	It's supposedly one of the most conservative, you know, Bible-believing seminaries out there.
	And yet, this is probably why you had the Babylon Bee put up a joke post, said, miracle.
	A seminary student graduates from seminary school and still believes in the Bible, right?
	You've got people like Al Mohler running this stuff.
	And when he talks about theological stuff, I mean, it's...
	He's not off the charts away from the Bible, but when you look at his discernment about what's going on in society, it's amazing.
	And he continues to inject himself into politics when he is completely uninformed, is the most charitable way to put it.
	Perhaps he does know what's going on.
	He's written books like The Gathering Storm.
	Or we cannot be silent.
	He always takes the position about how we have to be engaged in the culture.
	As Christians, we should be defending innocent life.
	And yet everything that he does is going the other way.
	He said he believes that Biden courageously planted a flag for democracy in the face of totalitarianism.
	You have someone literally going to plant the flag, the American flag, on the side of liberty in a contested war zone.
	Well, Al, even the head of NATO says that this was a war that began in 2014.
	And if you're going to plant your flag, you better understand there aren't any good guys in this war.
	There isn't any side of liberty.
	Look at the Ukrainian kill list.
	Look at what they're doing.
	It's not even remotely, could be remotely considered to be a democracy.
	And neither, of course, is Russia.
	The bottom line is both of them are totalitarian governments.
	It's kind of like watching a fight between Iraq and Iran.
	We just need to stay out of it.
	And by the way, you might want to, since you've got a theological seminary, you might want to review that and maybe do a lesson on that Blessed Be the Peacemakers thing that Jesus had out there.
	What does that mean to you, Al Mohler?
	He says, what shouldn't be up for debate is It's whether or not a Western form of constitutional democracy, a constitutional republic of some form, is infinitely superior to a form of totalitarianism that celebrates human oppression and raises it to a level of ideology that can only be described as religious, he says. Well, I think you could make that description about both Ukraine and Russia.
	What makes him think that Ukraine is a Western form of constitutional democracy?
	It was born in corruption, and it has gotten worse over the last nine years.
	It's a fantasy to think that.
	And it's a fantasy to think that about America as well.
	America is not a constitutional republic anymore.
	These people, explain to me, if this is a constitutional republic, what's been going on for the last 1,082 days?
	What happened in 2020?
	What happened in 2021?
	And on. If we've got a constitutional democracy, if we are a constitutional republic, what happened to the Constitution?
	That's absolute nonsense to think that our government or their government is that way.
	Gingrich on Ukraine.
	I'm against the idea that we should pour endless cash out with no notion of what victory would be.
	Newt Gingrich always seems to understand where the...
	The safe ground is in politics, as he said many times, he said, well, you know, if you go out and do a poll and you see where 80% of the people are, that's where I want to be, right?
	Because he wants to get elected.
	And, you know, and that's one of the dangers of democracy is that people follow the mob.
	Our leaders follow the mob.
	But he does. And he understands that the people...
	Or not with this.
	But I would have to say, since when has victory ever been defined since World War II? Have we ever had a war where we have a definition of what victory looks like?
	Not to my knowledge.
	As a matter of fact, we look at the, I talked about this on Friday.
	I talked a bit more about it.
	I was fortunate enough to be able to guest host for Bradley Dean on Sons of Liberty on Saturday for a couple hours because a lot of people, I'm kind of the snake plissken of the alternative media.
	You know, everybody thinks I'm dead.
	Not that I'm some great hero like Snake Plissken was in Escape from New York.
	But nobody knows. And so every time I do a show like that, I say, oh, I didn't know David Knight was still around.
	And so it's good to get on shows like that.
	And when I was on, I talked about what is happening with infrastructure.
	And how, as we have escalated our direct attacks against Russian infrastructure, under the guise of plausible deniability, it wasn't us that blew up the pipeline.
	It was somebody else.
	We don't know who. Well, who else has got motive and opportunity?
	We said that from the very beginning, and of course, they're still trying to push back against Cy Hirsch and his inside sources who gave him more details about it, but they are in complete denial.
	They don't want to do an investigation.
	Why are they trying to hide? Anyway, we know who was blowing that up.
	We had the Crimean Bridge that was blown up, what was it, about eight months ago?
	It's now been, you know, it was in October.
	And... So not even eight months, four months or so.
	It has now been completely restored, less than five months.
	And they've got all traffic that is still able to use it.
	All lanes are open. But when we look at this, it's far easier to do plausible deniability with cyber attacks on infrastructure.
	And you can always blame it on cyber criminals.
	You can always charge ransom and things like that.
	Or it could be that there is a state actor like Russia behind these types of things.
	when you look at the takedown of all the flights by attacking an ancillary system that would tell people where events were, the NOTAM system.
	Happened in the U.S., took it down from late at night until early in the morning, and then an hour and a half after we got everything back up, it happened in Canada.
	Two separate systems, independent of each other.
	Of course, both of them have the NOTAM system to report events.
	But again, taking those down, just like they took down all of the food production of Dole, for several days because they attacked their accounting system or they took down the largest pipeline to the East Coast colonial pipeline because they came after their accounting software.
	So these types of things as we look at this just be aware To prepare.
	You have to think about this.
	I'm not selling unpreparedness stuff.
	I'm just telling you because I believe this is going to be increasing.
	We're seeing more and more attacks on the infrastructure that are obviously attacks, shootings and things like that for whatever reason.
	The rail system is just rotting away.
	But we also have situations where there's pipe bombs being left on the railroad system.
	So, all of this stuff, these grid attacks, the cyber attacks, the collapsing infrastructure, all the rest of this stuff is something that puts all of us at great risk, but many of these things...
	I would not be surprised to see if they were being, if Russia was behind them.
	You think they're going to just take the attacks on their infrastructure and not do anything about it?
	They're not going to launch missiles or an EMP until, you know, we're up to the point where we're at full war.
	But to do these cyber attacks and things like that and sabotage, having people come across the border would be the easiest thing in the world to do.
	Meanwhile, Zelensky is berating and threatening Americans who don't support what he wants to do.
	That's why I call it World War Z.
	A reporter who had asked what Zelensky would tell the growing number of Americans who are increasingly critical of the billions in taxpayer money being shoveled in Kiev's coffers, he said Russia would, quote, enter the Baltic states, NATO member states, and then the U.S. will have to send their sons and daughters exactly the way that we are sending their sons and daughters to war.
	That's what he said. You'll have to do it the same way we're sending your sons and daughters.
	Maybe he misspoke.
	Maybe it was a Freudian slip.
	But that is what he wants.
	He wants to draw us into a war.
	He wants to draw the world into a world war.
	And pushing out another one of these domino theories.
	Same thing, same lie that pushed us into the Vietnam War and kept it going for a long time.
	That was another political war.
	He says they will be dying, your sons and daughters.
	Let me tell you what, we push this, we continue to push this thing, and they'll be dying.
	They won't even have to go to Ukraine to do it.
	They'll be dying here. We have a world war.
	We are not going to be untouched if we have another war.
	That's one of the most fatal conceits I see from Americans right now.
	They think that we are special.
	We can go to war with anybody in the world and we can do whatever we want because we've got an all-powerful empire and nobody can ever touch us.
	Well, you're going to find out about that if we keep pushing this.
	He said, are American children any different from ours?
	No. This is the same people, the same administration that made a conscious decision that Arrestovich openly talked about on Ukrainian television.
	They made a conscious decision to sacrifice the people of their country, including children, sons, and daughters.
	They made that conscious sacrifice.
	Would he do any less to you, to your sons and daughters, in America, in Europe, and elsewhere?
	No. Of course not.
	He's willing to kill and sacrifice his own people for his political ambitions.
	And he will sacrifice yours as well.
	We don't need Zelensky lecturing Americans on what to think and do, said Representative Andy Biggs on Twitter.
	We have absolutely every right to question an end to all aid in Ukraine.
	Absolutely right. We'll be right back.
	Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
	It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes.
	The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
	Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back. Well, last week they were coming after James and the Giant Peach or whatever.
	I guess it was Charlie.
	And the Chocolate Factory was the way that Dahl wrote it initially.
	Now they're coming after James Bond.
	And we'll talk about what they want to do to James Bond here in a moment.
	But before we do, I want to thank the people who have kindly and voluntarily supported the program.
	These are people that we got contributions in the mail.
	And you can find our P.O. Box at TheDavidKnightShow.com, as well as all the places where you can find the program.
	And please, if you can't support the program, please pass it around so that people know that it is there.
	As Dr. Michael Yadin said, he said, look, I'm talking to you, but I can't talk to your friends, your relatives.
	He goes, you can. You can pass this information on to them.
	But I don't have any way to get to them.
	And so it's very important that we pass along these existential threats.
	And, you know, over the weekend, well, yesterday at church I was talking to a guy and he said, yeah, I used to listen to conservative talk radio and it just got me really...
	Anxious and upset about, you know, what is happening.
	So I just had to stop listening to it.
	And, you know, he found out what I did and so we started talking about that.
	He said, yeah, I used to listen to that a lot, but I don't listen to anything like that anymore.
	And I said, well, the problem is, is that many times it's something that you ought to be concerned and upset about.
	It's not going to go away if you...
	Take a Pollyanna attitude about it.
	If you just whistle in the dark and say, well, I'm not going to pay attention.
	I don't see that. It's not going to go away.
	You need to be aware of the threat.
	And there are things that you can do.
	You're not helpless. There are things that you can do to take care of yourself and your family.
	But I said, the other thing is, is that you should never be, as a Christian, and we're talking about this at church, you should never be hopeless, right?
	Of all people, we are the ones who have hope in all of this.
	As I've said many times, if you have hope in an eternal life, if you see this life as just this tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny dot, In this line that goes on forever and ever, you see that you've got a limited amount of time to make a change, But you also understand, because you've got a fulcrum point that is based in eternity, that gives you leverage to do whatever you need to do in this life.
	And you don't have to worry about what the outcome is.
	You just have to worry about what the right thing to do is and leave the outcome to God.
	And that's the way Christians ought to look at this.
	And so I said, I try not to overload people with simply bad news.
	I want to give them a heads up as to what is coming for them.
	I want to tell them if there is a vaccine that is circulating around that's even being demanded that you take it, but it's got horrific side effects that have already been shown.
	How could I not tell people about that?
	How could you not tell people about that, even if they don't listen?
	Again, it's the principle of the watcher on the wall, the watchman on the wall.
	If you see the enemy coming, I hate to say that, but, you know, we have to do whatever we can.
	And so, the fact that a lot of this stuff is dark, And unpleasant?
	I know that very well.
	I sit here and I look into the abyss on a daily basis.
	The only thing that keeps me sane is a foundation in Christ and an understanding of what this life is truly about.
	This is just a temporary thing.
	It's a time of trial, a time of testing.
	It can also be a time of blessing, but it is ultimately about the long picture.
	But anyway, before I get to this, and I got off on a side here, I do want to thank the people who have supported us, many of them very generously.
	Ed and Cindy B., thank you.
	David and Joan F., thank you very much.
	Mary and Donald H., Daniel H., Mary Ellen M., John R., Rita L., Bruce W., Scott C., and Tom and Nancy.
	Thank you, all of you. Tom and Nancy, always big supporters from the time this show has started.
	Thank you very much. I really do appreciate it.
	Where we are right now with the gas gauge, we have it set up in eights.
	We probably should make it a little bit beyond...
	Seven-eighths, but I put it there because, you know, kind of halfway between the two.
	Not quite full, so I didn't move it up to the next one.
	But thank you so much for the support that you've given us.
	That's what allows us to do this.
	Let's talk about what's going on with James Bond.
	Now they want to rewrite James Bond this week.
	This week it's James Bond.
	And... I was surprised because James Bond has already been extensively rewritten by Hollywood by the Broccoli family that just bought the Bond franchise.
	And typically what they do, if you look at a James Bond novel and you look at the James Bond movie, the corresponding movie, they take the title and they take the location.
	That's about it.
	From Russia with love.
	I mean, they just elaborate it.
	That was all about the Cold War in West Berlin.
	He's there. There's somebody that's going to be coming across the border.
	James Bond is sent there.
	And pretty much all of it, if I remember, it's been a long time since I read it, pretty much all of it was him just kind of waiting.
	And watching out of his room, looking for the person on the other side who is going to be focused on this person of interest who is going to be trying to cross over from East Germany into West Germany.
	They were going to try to assassinate him.
	And so Bond's duty, the whole point from Russia with Love, was to take out the assassin before the assassin could kill the person who was coming across, that type of thing.
	Moonraker, if you look at that, very, very different.
	As a matter of fact, one of the things that I thought was the funniest thing about Moonraker was, yeah, here it is.
	Here's his car. We're used to all the flashy Bond cars.
	The Aston Martin with all the gadgets on it and everything.
	That wasn't in the original things.
	You know, the car was focused.
	And he talked about the car being souped up and being very fast.
	But he didn't have a car that could go underwater or had, you know, all these weapons and missiles and machine guns and oil slicks and smoke stuff.
	It was this. Something like this.
	It was a Bentley. And not only that, but it was an old Bentley at the time that he was driving it.
	This looks like Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, for those of you who are listening.
	This is one of the early, early cars.
	It's got a really long hood because it had a very, very large engine, but of course, horsepower density was not that much in those days.
	So even though it had a massive engine, it wasn't developing all that much horsepower.
	And these little narrow bicycle wheels didn't handle very well.
	By the way he was describing it in Moonraker, he had a...
	He had souped this up.
	It was still an expensive car.
	He was supposed to be independently wealthy.
	And so he had souped it up.
	It was very fast. And I remember in Moonraker, there was some kind of a car chase scene or something like that.
	And he crashes the car.
	And he's very upset that he's lost this Bentley.
	But it's still a couple of decades old.
	And he just worked on it himself and souped it up.
	But that was what was in the novel.
	It was very different. But now they're concerned, and that's the other thing that I thought was surprising about this, was it wasn't so much about sexism or the sex in the James Bond things and his attitude towards women, as it was about racism.
	Racism.
	Ian Fleming's original James Bond novels have been rewritten to remove racist remarks ahead of an upcoming re-release marking the 70th anniversary since the release of his first novel, Casino Royale.
	And again, you know, if you look at the difference between the Casino Royale that David Niven was in and the Casino Royale that was done more recently, you can see the kind of artistic license that they take with these pretty much the same way they do it with all the books.
	Typically, they'll go out and they'll pay for a novel because they want the name and the character and what is surrounding that, you know, be good for box office, and they just go ahead and do their own thing as if they had not even bought the novel.
	But maybe instead of reading...
	Ian Fleming's James Bond novels or watching the movies, maybe what you ought to do is read or watch Fahrenheit 451 instead, because that's really what we're talking about here with all of these things.
	Book burnings. People who are upset if they read books, and so, you know, they demand that the books that we read be burned.
	They've hired, according to The Telegraph, The publishing company hired, quote, sensitivity readers, sensitivity readers to look at these novels.
	In other words, I imagine these are current college students or newly graduated and brainwashed graduates who are constantly and perpetually offended by everything.
	And they have them scour this for anything that they take exception to.
	The book was written at a time when terms and attitudes might be considered offensive by modern readers were commonplace, they said.
	Yeah, at a time when they drove Bentleys.
	By the way, I said it looked like Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.
	Ian Fleming wrote Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.
	Not one of my favorite films, but...
	Iconic characters such as Oddjob, of course, will have their descriptions rejigged.
	I'm sure that instead of Oddjob being Asian, he'll probably be some kind of a white male because we've got to have a villain.
	You know, the villains change as well, don't they?
	Just like the cars.
	According to reports last week, coming reprints of children's novels from classic author Dahl were edited or to remove references deemed problematic with a description of the infamous glutton Augustus Gloop from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. coming reprints of children's novels from classic author Dahl were uh Any references to this infamous glutton being fat or removed?
	No, because we don't want anybody to be offended.
	And of course, everything that Rudyard Kipling has done is being removed, especially even the Jungle Book.
	Referred to by one idiot as imperialist garbage.
	So the question is, is Disney going to purge everything about the Jungle Book now like they did with Song of the South?
	I mean, the Jungle Book itself is not racist.
	And quite frankly, neither was Song of the South.
	I thought Song of the South was a nice picture of everybody, black and white, getting along together like little rascals or something.
	That's the way I saw it.
	Of course, these people want to see in it whatever they want to see.
	But the fact that Uncle Remus was a slave, he was looked up to by the white kids who were interacting with him.
	And as I said before, you know, we have some of our best literature has been written by slaves.
	Uncle Remus was a slave.
	Aesop was a slave.
	And look at all the stories that we got from Aesop's fables.
	And he was a slave. We don't know anything about him except that he was a slave.
	And I've said before, you know, when we talk about Song of the South, we should take a look at Aesop's fables because both of those show us that even though somebody is a slave, what it does is it testifies to their humanity.
	It testifies to their intelligence and everything, their wisdom, their insight.
	Just being a slave... Doesn't mean that you don't have anything to contribute.
	And I think it's very important to understand that instead of purging this because they were a slave, they were a slave, but they persevered.
	They were a slave, but they excelled in what they were doing.
	To me, that is even more important.
	Another reason why you would elevate something like Uncle Remus's tales or Aesop's fables, because they did this while they were slaves.
	They had this kind of insight.
	So... People will read whatever they want to read into it, and so we have a school board member who is now reading into Iwo Jima, that iconic statue and picture, and then a statue of the Marines planting the flag as a group.
	She calls that evil, evil.
	This, of course, is in a Virginia school board.
	The person is Muslim.
	Her name is Abrar Omiish.
	She was elected to Fairfax County School Board in 2019.
	She made her comments during a meeting on Thursday.
	She said, there's a lot of history in February.
	A number of community members reached out to me, and just a few days ago was Japanese remembrance.
	Something for us to certainly reflect on as we learn our history and think about it.
	The days when Iwo Jima unfortunately happened and set a record for really what, I hate to say, human evil is capable of.
	She thinks that that was a set of record for what human evil is capable of.
	Those soldiers who fought and died on Iwo Jima.
	Absolutely astonishing.
	This is why I say, when people like this can be put into a school board, you never know what is on your school board.
	You never know the principles. You don't know what the teachers are doing, where they're coming from.
	Why would you turn your kids over to someone like this, who is evil?
	The embodiment of evil.
	As she described herself in her election literature, I'm Abrar Omiish, Democrat candidate for Fairfax County School Board at Large.
	I'm running to ensure that the, quote, great equalizer, unquote, education is fairly facilitated to all students.
	And this is a person who, after she got elected, she's going to use the great equalizer, education, To tell people that what the Marines did on Iwo Jima is a great record of evil.
	As they point out briefly here in Breitbart, the five-week-long battle began February 19th, 1945, turned into some of the bloodiest fighting during the war with nearly 7,000 Marines killed.
	Video footage, and they have some of the video footage there from the History Channel, shows American forces making their way over the volcanic ash, the terrible, yellow, craggy, rocky, lifeless soil, they said, on the island as bullets flew past their heads during the fighting.
	So when asked to clarify her statement, She said, there's no reason to warp what was said, and reading more into it merely reflects biases forced in by the listener, she said.
	She's not biased.
	Anybody who criticizes her is biased, right?
	Anybody who says they don't have any biases, well, they're lying to you and to themselves.
	She did not tell the outlet why she called Iwo Jima evil, or why she said it, quote, unfortunately happened.
	Yes, it was unfortunate that it happened.
	It was unfortunate that it had to happen.
	I think I might have some insight on why she said this for these people.
	Well, like you said, she's evil, and she's also incredibly stupid.
	Look at her picture.
	Look at the head tilt and the empty, vacuous eyes.
	Oh, that's true. There is nothing going on there.
	This is a person that's like, um, what is my next word in this sentence going to be?
	Point of view. Yeah.
	POV, I just love that.
	It's like, okay, stop right there.
	Not to shame people on their appearance.
	Yeah. There's some things you can't help.
	No, but it's her attitude. This person is dumb and you can see it in their appearance.
	You better not write any children's books.
	They'll just eviscerate them.
	We point out the truth.
	Anyway, Cambridge University has been blocking working class whites from applying for postgraduate program.
	Is this anything new?
	Well, no. What's interesting is that they reversed this.
	That is new.
	This type of thing has been going on for a long time.
	They said the Telegraph said lectures at the university were told the program will be advertised for second or third year undergrad students from black, British black, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or British Pakistani, British Bangladeshi students.
	Studying at traditional research-intensive universities.
	After being contacted by the newspaper as to why working-class white students were not included for consideration, despite significant under-representation at the elite university, the school ultimately reversed course.
	Yeah, as a matter of fact, they've been so focused on quote-unquote diversity...
	That now the biggest, or I guess you could say the smallest number of people, the minority, are now going to be white students who don't have any money, right?
	As one professor said, it's good that the program has now been recalibrated so that the criterion is disadvantage, economic disadvantage, rather than race.
	The racial criterion seemed to assume that non-white students are automatically disadvantaged.
	He said, isn't that a little bit racist?
	Well, yes it is, but that's the whole basis of critical race theory.
	You know, you can't be racist unless you're white.
	And if you're white, you're racist even if you don't hate anybody.
	That's the lies that they've been pushing out everywhere.
	When looking at who has actually offered places in such programs, they said mixed-race Caribbean students led the way with 75%.
	Followed by Indians at 61%, and with white students in third place at 61%.
	I'm assuming, since that doesn't add up to 100%, that of the applicants who were people who applied for it, I guess.
	I don't know. I don't understand those statistics that don't add up to 100%.
	Anyway, for the first time, they said in recorded history, White students are now lagging behind all other major ethnic groups in the country because, I don't know, why would you even want to go to Cambridge and study that?
	I mean, I looked at some of this stuff, and I looked at what some universities are doing.
	I remember when this stuff was really big at MIT, and when I was thinking about going to graduate school, I ultimately did not for engineering.
	I decided to go to the one in Atlanta.
	What is it? Anyway, Georgia Tech.
	It's been a long time.
	Because at MIT, they were so focused on, you know, getting everybody, you know, their diversity and equity and inclusivity program was already pretty well developed.
	And it's like, I don't even want to go to a place like that.
	If that's going to be their criteria for putting me in, no thanks.
	I'm not interested. Anyway, Elon Musk has now slammed coverage of Scott Adams and the Dilbert controversy.
	And, of course, this is something that broke over the weekend, I think.
	Scott Adams, actually, no, it was there last week.
	I think I talked about it.
	He went back and he looked at A poll that was done by Rasmussen, and they asked black people if it was okay to be white.
	Do you remember when that came out of, what was it, 4chan or something?
	They said, hey, Halloween is coming up.
	This is, you know, maybe 2019 or earlier, you know, before the COVID-9-11 nonsense.
	And they said, because they said, look, Halloween is coming up, so you can wear a mask and they can't see who you are, right?
	So it was before the COVID nonsense.
	But they said, take some posters and write them up and say it's okay to be white and post them everywhere at the university and watch what happens.
	And boy, it really hit the fan.
	They hated that. It's not okay to be white.
	It's like, really? It's not okay to be white?
	So that's been around for a while.
	That's kind of the basis.
	Yeah, it's okay to be white signs appear in schools and cities across the U.S. And they were so upset about it.
	Mainstream media wrote what, yeah, there it is, 4chan chatroom.
	What an outrage it was to put that kind of stuff up.
	That was 2017. Thanks for finding that, Travis.
	2017. And so that was an outrage.
	But that message has been, they've been pushing that message now for six years.
	And it's pretty much been accepted by the black community.
	So Rasmussen does a poll.
	And they found that 26% of blacks, they said, is it okay to be white?
	26% of blacks said no.
	21% were not sure.
	So you're looking at a combined 47% that don't know or disagree that it's okay to be white.
	And so he talked about that.
	But the way that he talked about it was in a way to...
	Invite controversy, I believe.
	I think Scott Adams is doing it deliberately.
	But you know, if you live by controversy, you will die.
	Diversity, inclusivity, and equity, you will die that way by controversy.
	And that's what is happening to him right now.
	And everything that he had to say was really stoking this race war.
	You know, that is to say that it's not okay to be white.
	That is incredibly racist, but they want that.
	And now the people who are canceling him want that as well.
	But again, he doesn't offer any solution for this.
	And there is a solution.
	How do we correct this?
	How do we stop the public?
	First of all, we stop the public funding of these racist institutions, the colleges that are doing this.
	Everybody knows this. Going back to 2017, 4chan saying, do this on a college campus.
	And it's coming from there.
	CRT has now come about since then.
	But that is what the institutions are for.
	They're institutions to fester and to push racism.
	It's like Bill Ayers and his white skin privilege that he started doing after he wasn't getting anywhere blowing up buildings and blowing up police officers.
	So he decided he'd go into education.
	And they were, you know, at the very beginning, pushing white skin privilege because he wasn't getting any traction with the old fashioned Marxist class warfare and economics.
	He decided he would go class warfare based on skin color.
	And that's what this truly is.
	So we need to stop funding, publicly funding these organizations.
	If people want to push this kind of racism, let them pay for it themselves instead of forcing us to foot the bill, to create this kind of hatred.
	But the real answer is not going to be found in any political commentary.
	It's not going to be found by clutching your pearls and saying, isn't this horrible what they've been doing for years and years and years?
	Again, it was nothing new that he had to say.
	But... Now he's being his cartoon, which I never thought was funny or insightful.
	Dilbert is now being canceled everywhere.
	And Scott Adams has been on the side of Trump, but he's not been on the side of freedom, liberty, conservative government, or even common sense.
	The guy is absolutely clueless.
	He was the one that, you know, right at the very beginning, it's getting harder and harder to tell these freedom lovers from sociopaths, right, the beginning of lockdown.
	And he's been there ever since.
	He doesn't have any solutions to anything.
	And so he puts this out.
	This is how he responded.
	And listen to what a contradictory paradox is.
	He says, everyone should be treated as an individual.
	Okay, fine. Leave it at that.
	Oh, but he's not finished yet.
	You should also avoid any group that doesn't respect you, even if there are people within that group who are fine.
	So, everybody should be treated as an individual, but you should avoid particular groups.
	Again, the guy is absolutely incapable of any logical thought or expression, and he has no solutions.
	That's not a solution.
	How do you counter this lie of racism?
	Will you point out to everybody that the biblical understanding from the Old Testament to the New Testament, you know, Judeo to Judeo-Christian throughout, It has an understanding that we're all descended from Adam, and then even after that, from Noah. And it even says in the New Testament, God has created all nations of one blood.
	The distinction in the Bible is between nations, tongues, and tribes.
	It's not between skin color. And what are we talking about there?
	Well, we're talking about politics, national borders.
	We're talking about Languages, tongues, and we're talking about tribes.
	We're talking about customs. And as I've said before, Michael Savage talks about it.
	Languages, borders, and culture, I think, is what he talks about.
	Essentially, it's the same thing.
	I don't know if he has come up with that individually or if he pulled that from the Bible.
	The thing is, it's true. So he could either have learned that from the Bible or he could have learned it from observation because it's true.
	And so the things that divide us are not skin color.
	It's going to be political divisions, it's going to be language, and it's going to be culture.
	And then, so what do we do about that?
	I mean, we're still divided by all those things.
	Well, the unifying thing is Christ, where he transcends all of these things.
	So physically, we're all descended from and we're all related to everyone.
	As Ken Ham put it, he said, well, there's only one race and that's the human race.
	If you're not part of the human race, that's a big problem.
	It could be a big problem coming up soon here.
	But he said, the real difference is which way you're racing.
	Are you racing toward God?
	Are you racing away from God?
	And that's the difference. If you're racing towards God, you're going to put these differences behind you, and you're going to treat people as individuals.
	End of story. You don't need the second thing about avoiding particular groups.
	And he doesn't have a solution for any of this stuff.
	Because he doesn't want to embrace the fact that in Christ there's not male or female, there's not free or slave, there's not Greek or Jew as the division at the time they were talking about today would say white or black.
	Those distinctions don't exist because God looks at the inside of a person, not the external appearance.
	That's the answer that we have.
	These are problems, but there are answers that are there.
	But he doesn't have the answer.
	He says there's no fixing this.
	That's what he said. He gave the Rasmussen poll.
	He said there's no fixing this.
	Well, he's wrong about that. He said it makes no sense to help black Americans.
	If you're white, it's over. Don't even think it's worth trying.
	Totally not trying. We should be friendly.
	Like, I'm not saying that we start a war or do anything like that, but I'm just saying, get away from me.
	Okay, so he kind of sowed, he's reaping what he sowed, in my opinion.
	He doesn't have a clue about what's going on politically or what has happened to us the last thousand days, and he's actually pouring fire, whether he intends to or not.
	On this whole race war narrative.
	He's doing their work for them.
	So... My Scott Adams is a big dummy theory gets stronger and stronger every day.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	He says, and this is the final comment from, let's see, this is Zero Hedge had it.
	Surprisingly, as we write this, the video version and his channel are still accessible on YouTube.
	Well, I guess they like the race war.
	You know, on YouTube. They love that kind of stuff.
	I've said this many times. You look at Crowder, you look at Watson, and when they do this kind of stuff, they get millions of people to watch them.
	What YouTube hates is It's information about Big Pharma.
	They hate information about the pandemic.
	They hate information about the CIA. They hate information about the Federal Reserve.
	But hey, if you want to mix it up between different groups of people based on skin color, and you want to make fun of people, and you want to accentuate all these cultural divisions, well, they're just fine with that.
	By the way, the Biden administration, as we're talking about the reparations, and we mentioned last week the Lunacy of Angela Davis who, you know, black Marxist pushing hatred and then finds out that she's half white.
	She's got two grandparents who are white, both the grandfathers.
	And as I said, she was devastated to find that out.
	Why? Why was she devastated?
	Because she hates white people so much.
	But it also shows how ridiculous it is to try to do reparations here in the United States.
	You're not going to know who people are descended from.
	She doesn't even know. And that's the greatest tragedy, is that the family is so broken.
	Her family in America, but not just her family.
	Families in general are broken.
	And we've seen our institutions.
	You know, she went to the big name brand institutions and they turned her into a Marxist.
	These are the big institutions, you know, places like Harvard and Yale and other places like that.
	They began as Christian seminaries.
	Now they are Marxist seminaries.
	So that's what we're looking at. And this is coming out of the Biden administration.
	$1.2 trillion of the American Rescue Plan Act.
	And every day we're seeing different municipalities jumping into it and saying, well, you know, if we're going to rescue America, we've got to begin with reparations.
	So let's take this $1.2 trillion and let's start using it for reparations, for racial equity justice, they say.
	And so Janet Yellen, U.S. Treasury Secretary, Again, justice is something that needs no modifiers, and if you put modifiers on it, you're not talking about justice anymore.
	You're talking about something that is not justice.
	What this is going to do, and the purpose of reparations, is to, again, pour fire on the race war, fire on division, to split people more and more into different groups that hate each other.
	So, the mayor of San Antonio has promoted the city's first-of-its-kind working equity atlas.
	As a model, a best practice for measuring and doling out resources based on equity.
	And so what it does is it assigns equity scores by census tracts and aggregates them by districts.
	And then if your district gets a favorable score, you're going to get money thrown at you, right?
	I would describe this as, you know, we talked about geospatial intelligence, right?
	Thinking of people's political beliefs or religious beliefs, things like that, mapping them so that the intelligence community knows who is not going to follow their narrative, who might oppose them, who they might start regarding as enemies of the state simply because they don't like your politics, that type of thing. That's the way they've been using geospatial intelligence.
	This will be, I guess we could call this georacism.
	We're going to map out our racist policies.
	And that's exactly what the mayor of San Antonio is doing.
	I've got to say, and this is typical of most states, in Texas, you look at Austin and San Antonio and Dallas and Houston, what horrible places they are.
	But that is what typically happens.
	The big cities seem to be a magnet for this kind of corruption, this kind of Marxism.
	And then because they are a magnet for populations and they have the bulk of the population, they wind up taking over the rest of the state.
	And this is the way states are going down one by one.
	It's been a big issue in Texas when we were living there.
	Anyway, one of the things that they're going to give you points for...
	Is if you've got a higher percentage of people who speak Spanish as a first language.
	So if you've got people who come here and don't even bother to learn the language, well, let's give those people more money.
	And we'll take the money from the people who do speak English and we'll give it to the people who don't even want to learn to speak English, let alone, you know, come here illegally.
	If you've got a high illiteracy rate, you get extra points.
	Skin color gives you extra points.
	And so, what they will do, all these, of course, as they point out in this Zero Hedge article, all these are violations of the Equal Protection Clause, but, you know, welfare itself.
	That's always been a violation of the Constitution, but we're going to start rewarding people for this, and we'll take the money from the people who have higher-paying jobs or who speak English or whatever.
	You speak English, well, we're going to tax you, and we're going to give it to the people who don't speak English.
	What's that going to do? Well, that's going to inflame division and resentment and civil war.
	That's what all this reparation stuff, what all the CRT stuff has been designed for from the very beginning.
	The census tract, with one of the lowest equity scores in the city, he said the one that he was in, had two out of a possible ten.
	That means that where he lived, the district will have the lowest priority for resources.
	You know, if you've got roads that are falling apart, well, we're not going to pave your roads or whatever.
	I mean, it's just, this is all about redistribution.
	And that's really what reparation is about, right?
	Redistribution. It's about Marxism.
	Redistributing the money.
	They are actually getting their economic Marxism revolution, but they're doing it on the basis of a race revolution, interestingly enough.
	So, I guess we are at the final stages of the democracy, right?
	Because when the people realize that they can vote themselves largesse out of the treasury, it's kind of over.
	And that looks like that's what's happening right here.
	This article from Real Clear Wire, It says, one-size-fits-all education doesn't work well, but diversity advocates are hitting the accelerator.
	Well, of course, the one-size-fits-all was always a problem for decades.
	I remember we had a cartoon that passed around people about homeschooling.
	And it would say, what if, and it shows in this cartoon, you know, exaggerated differences in size, you know, weight and skinny and tall and short, young and old, and everybody has the same size basketball uniform and same size basketball shoes.
	So do we do this for anything else?
	Well, that's the way your education is doled out to you, right?
	You want to send your kids to that kind of a system, that one-size-fits-all?
	But the reality is that the one-size-fits-all is really coming from the Department of Education.
	And this has been around for a long time, and so I was really kind of surprised to see that in this article, this is from Real Clear Wire, They are bemoaning the fact that all this diversity stuff has been costing people on learning.
	Don't they realize that the goal of schools...
	Was to make sure that reading and writing and math was not taught, the deliberate dumbing down.
	That's what Charlotte Isby pointed out when she went to Washington to shut down the newly created Department of Education, as Ronald Reagan had promised.
	No, they kept this thing going, and she said, this is about deliberately dumbing down kids, and that was 40 years ago.
	So this article goes on for like 10 pages to talk about how they are failing, and yet Never seems to realize that was the purpose of this.
	First of all, you don't give them any tools so they can function in life so they can learn anything.
	All you're doing in the current school system is just teaching them to hate.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, welcome back. Last week I talked about the lady who has, um, she's now in her mid-30s.
	And she's suing the doctors who mutilated her.
	Gave her a hysterectomy, double mastectomy, and all the rest of this stuff.
	She didn't begin her journey in that until she was 21 years old.
	She didn't have any of those surgeries until she was in her mid-20s.
	And, um... It truly is amazing to see the timeline of that.
	And as I pointed out last week, I said, you know, you even have people like Christopher Beck, the Navy SEAL, who then became Kristen Beck, and he said, look, you know, I was pushed into this by people.
	These are adults that are being railroaded and seriously regret what they've done to their body.
	But as I also pointed out, you have the Pennsylvania state government pushing parents and saying, you know, is your baby perhaps non-binary?
	They want to put this in at the very beginning of life to push this on the kids.
	And what we now have is it looks like Tennessee is going to be the first state to do something about these drag queen story time hours and the drag queen public parades and all the rest of the stuff that are sexualizing minors.
	I mean, when you look at the rapid increase in people who are identifying as LGBT, especially the T side of it, you have to understand that this is something that's being pushed to kids from birth now.
	It's not... It's not enough to push this to teenagers and people in high school who are vulnerable, who don't have that kind of judgment.
	No, they've got to go into the elementary school, then into the kindergarten.
	Now, at birth, Pennsylvania wants this pushed.
	And so Tennessee now has been passed in both houses.
	They're set to ban public drag performances.
	And the left, people like Matt Drudge, are absolutely livid about this.
	And saying that we're heading back into the dark ages, that type of thing.
	It's like, really? I don't think I've seen any pictures on any caveman walls of drag performances.
	So it's passed both houses.
	It's waiting. The governor's signature, of course, he's going to do it.
	What it will do, and this is model legislation for everybody to be taking a look at, adult cabaret performances, defined as a performance that features male or female impersonators, Who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest.
	That's the key thing. It's a prurient interest.
	Shows with topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, and strippers may also be classified as adult cabaret performances under the proposed law.
	So, when you look at this, though, this is coming from the Hill, they're very upset about it.
	Tennessee is set to ban some drag performances as well as gender-affirming health care for minors.
	No, abortion is not health care.
	And mutilating and sterilizing kids is not health care either.
	It's not gender-affirming health care.
	Tennessee Representative Chris Todd sponsored the companion bill.
	He said he was driven to introduce this measure after filing a court order last year to stop an advertised, quote-unquote, family-friendly drag show from taking place in a public park.
	And so, as we look at all this, again, you know, you want to sterilize minors, you want to mutilate them so they have problems the rest of their life, health problems, pain and incontinence and the rest of this stuff.
	You know, women, they call it reproductive care for women when they are killing their children.
	Planned Parenthood, when they're planning not to have kids, is...
	Dave Chappelle said, all you guys out there who support abortion, you're not pro-choice, you're anti-consequences.
	Banning gender-affirming health care for minors.
	Look, we've had the suicide increase dramatically.
	Now you've got a third of teen girls are contemplating suicide.
	We never saw anything like this before.
	They pushed this out to say, well, we've got to start talking to kids at an early age.
	About the fact that they're in the wrong body and all the other things that they try to throw at them.
	We have to start talking to them at a younger and younger age because otherwise they're going to commit suicide.
	And yet the reality is that we didn't have these kind of suicide rates until they started doing that.
	The same thing you saw with sex education.
	We will educate the kids at an earlier, earlier age about sex.
	Yeah, we'll grab the kids at 8 years old and we'll start telling them about sex.
	Of course, the entertainment industry and other things have a factor in this as well.
	We didn't see the explosion and that kind of stuff until they start teaching it in school.
	So then that brings us to Sam Brenton, who has been accused of stealing now from a third woman.
	I thought this was the second one.
	This is the third one. I missed number two.
	Even wearing her custom-designed clothes to public events.
	Let's see if you can find the picture for this.
	This is from RT. Disgraced Biden official photographed in stolen clothes.
	Houston-based Tanzanian fashion designer.
	Asia Consen tweeted an image of the former Department of Energy official wearing a red dress with black print alongside a photo of her wearing what appears to be the same garment, revealing that she had lost her suitcase full of custom designs on a 2018 Delta Airlines flight to Washington, D.C. and never recovered it.
	And the following day, she said, she tweeted several more images of Sam Britton in what appeared to be her clothes.
	He even wore her jewelry.
	One of the photos that surfaced was used in a Vanity Fair feature about the person, Sam Britton.
	They describe him as a flamboyant figure.
	And they featured his style while it was her clothes, and they were custom designed by her.
	The designer filed another complaint, this time with the Houston Police Department, in December after seeing Brenton sporting what appeared to be one of her dresses in a news report on the alleged thefts.
	While she was contacted the next month by the FBI office in Minneapolis, her husband told Fox News they'd heard nothing from either authority.
	I guess they're not interested in that.
	What they're really interested in is the parents who speak up at the PTA meetings about the gender gaslighting of their kids.
	Britton, who uses they-them pronouns, is facing hefty fines and years in prison related to two other luggage thefts.
	The disgraced former Deputy Assistant Secretary for spent fuel and waste disposition was released without bail last week following a hearing in Minneapolis where they...
	Are accused of stealing a suitcase worth $2,300 from the baggage carousel.
	So this is why the dollar amounts are so high.
	He seems to be going for just the best-dressed people.
	I don't know. I've never had a suitcase with $2,000 or $3,000 worth of clothes in it.
	They were previously arrested in December on grand larceny charges in Vegas, accused of stealing a suitcase worth $3,600.
	From the Harry Reid International Airport.
	So he's got a couple of cases now, and all these things are thousands of dollars that he's on the hook for.
	Meanwhile, we have Chelsea Clinton coming out to honor the guy who calls himself Rachel Levine.
	I like to call him just Ms.
	Richards, right?
	Because his name is Richard Levine.
	This guy who was woman of the year.
	Because we don't know what a woman is.
	Well, Chelsea Clinton has a series, She Persisted, to push the idea of strong women.
	And you can't get any stronger woman than a man, right?
	As we have seen in sports.
	Pushing transgender ideology on children by propping up Richard Levine.
	It is a book meant for children ages 6 through 9.
	And it only uses female pronouns for Levine.
	I'm not sure that he's even mutilated himself yet to show his commitment to what he's doing.
	Now, if you think this is all satanic, there would be reason for people to agree with you.
	The largest satanic gathering in history...
	Is mandating jabs, mandating masks, and having a drag show.
	It's checking all the boxes there.
	These are also the people who are saying that abortion is a ritual, it's a religious ritual for them, so, you know, let us do what we want to do.
	This is coming up, SatanCon 2023 in April.
	The satanic temple.
	And again, these people are just doing this because they want to get attention.
	You know, Lucian Greaves even changed his name to that.
	It's their 10-year anniversary.
	They will have a witch's night.
	They'll have a weekend, they said, of blasphemy and remembrance.
	However, the funny thing is, these people who are just so courageous to get in your face and to get in the face of God seem to be very afraid of death.
	They will require that you wear an N95 or a KN95 mask.
	They actually, it's one of the first times I've seen anybody define what a mask is when they've got a mask mandate.
	They said you will not wear a bandana or a cloth mask.
	That's not allowed. You're going to have to get an N95 or a KN95 mask.
	And you also have to be up to date on all your vaccines.
	It's almost like they're whistling through the graveyard.
	These people are very much afraid.
	Do they realize what is coming?
	I mean, they claim that they're just there to mock Christianity, but they sure are afraid to die.
	The event will apparently feature presentations, satanic rituals, discussion panels, a satanic marketplace, a mixer, even a satanic wedding chapel.
	Even the whole idea of marriage was something they stole from Christianity.
	That's why I say, you know, we should not have the government defining it.
	Marriage is a religious ceremony.
	It has profound implications and pictures of Christ's relationship to the church.
	There's no reason why.
	The government should be involved in it.
	Because, of course, the government doesn't understand any of that stuff, as we've now seen, with their definition of marriage.
	As a matter of fact, Biden had this to say at one point in time, not too far back.
	The world's going to Hades in a handbasket.
	We are desperately concerned about the circumstance relating to avian flu.
	We don't have enough vaccines.
	We don't have enough police officers.
	And we're going to debate the next three weeks, I'm told, gay marriage, a flag amendment, and God only knows what else.
	I can't believe the American people can't see through this.
	We already have a law. The Defense of Marriage Act.
	We've all voted, not where I voted and others said, look, marriage is between a man and a woman and states must respect that.
	Nobody's violated that law.
	There's been no challenge to that law.
	Why do we need a constitutional amendment?
	Marriage is between a man and a woman.
	What's the game going on here?
	Yeah, what is the game going on here?
	Yeah, who is that guy?
	You probably hardly recognize him because the way his speech has changed.
	Yeah, but that was Biden about 20 years ago.
	It's like, we've got all these problems here.
	We've got bird flu. Wait, I thought that was new.
	We've got bird flu.
	We don't have enough vaccines for everybody.
	We don't have enough police officers to lock up everybody because that was what he was always about.
	The guy pushing mandatory minimum charges and civil asset forfeiture and putting the drug war on steroids.
	That was what Biden was always about.
	It's like, why can't we just focus on that?
	Why do we got to care about marriage, right?
	We've already had the Defense of Marriage Act, and I voted for that.
	Bill Clinton voted for that.
	But now look at what is his number one priority.
	So, this year's satanic event.
	Yeah, and we are going to be going to Hell in the Handbasket.
	That's what they should call it. The Hell in the Handbasket Conference 2023.
	Reportedly, we'll have an off-site event called the Godless Assembly.
	Well, God will be there.
	You just don't acknowledge him.
	Which will also require proof of COVID vaccine and masks.
	The Godless Assembly event is slated to feature performances by a drag queen known as Madeline Hatter.
	Madeline, not so bright.
	Anyway, so watch out for luggage thieves.
	If you're going to this convention, you better dress down when you're carrying your luggage because if you dress up, you might have one of these guys coming around and scarfing up what you have.
	We'll be right back. Show, we've got a problem.
	Hello, what? Who are you?
	It's the new mug they're selling at thedavidknightshow.com, right?
	So, basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right?
	Because basically you can't hold coffee with your hands, right?
	I'm a scat and leave, but anyone tries to mug me, I'm being ready for it.
	You dog-faced pony soldier.
	They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee, then save the world.
	This could be bad for us.
	Save the world, but we owe the world.
	These people, they're supporting free speech with every month they buy.
	Come on. These people, I tell you, well, anyway.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidKnightShow.com That's a website.
	Yeah, that's a website, and that's somebody that they say is Vice President.
	Lala Harris.
	You know, there's another Vice President that is going to be running for President.
	That's Mike Pence. And as Mediaite, left-wing Mediaite said, Pence gets off an epic burn on Trump, an exclusive NBC News 2024 trash-talking session.
	Well, I'm just going to say that...
	Probably isn't anything that Pence could say about Trump.
	That is going to be nearly as damaging as the epic burn that happened in Palestine, Ohio.
	That is going to be something that is going to follow Biden and Lala Harris around for quite some time.
	You don't need to have trash talking when you got these people burning toxic chemicals and doing nothing at all about it.
	So Biden had an interview where he talked about East Palestine and what he had done about it.
	And he was pretty defiant about it.
	Well, man, I've talked to pretty much everybody that's there that there's anybody to talk to.
	I mean, there's nothing else I can do about that.
	Right? And yet the people there are saying we're dying slowly.
	One person, as they were speaking, he said, well, you know, I sound like Mickey Mouse now.
	My voice is normally low.
	And his wife or girlfriend was there with him and said, yeah, you know, and his voice was really high-pitched.
	I mean, it wasn't like helium type of thing, but...
	We used to do that. When the kids were little and we went to Walt Disney World back in the early 90s, I would get helium balloons and then I would, while we're in line, I would take a breath of one of them and it would get, and then try to talk as low as I could.
	And it gives you a very interesting voice.
	But he is, the bottom line is that it has affected his voice.
	And he says, my chest hurts at night.
	I feel like I'm drowning.
	I cough up a lot of phlegm.
	I lost my job because a doctor won't release me for work.
	What's being done to help these people?
	Nothing. If you go back and you look at the creation of the EPA, what was it created for?
	Super funds to, you know, clean up these toxic chemical spills and things like that.
	That was where it started.
	And then it changed to saying, well, we're going to tell you that you can't drive a car.
	You can't have a car because it's got emissions or something like that.
	And trying to create the idea that more people were dying of fine particulate matter coming out of diesels than were dying of cancer and heart disease.
	Total lie. Sold to us by the Obama administration's EPA director, Lisa Jackson, and Ed Markey at the time he was a congressman.
	And at the time they were saying that, you had the EPA there in North Carolina where I was.
	Looking for people who had respiratory and heart issues and exposing them to 72 times the level of fine particulate matter they said would make them sick.
	And she emphasized. She said, I'm not talking about people getting sick.
	I'm talking about people dying.
	The EPA had to be shamed into going to East Palestine, and they're still not doing anything.
	And you can't even shame Biden to go and take a look at it, just like you couldn't shame Lala Harris to go to the border and take a look at that.
	So Biden says, I can't recall if, who I talk, and I don't think I've talked to East Palestine mayor.
	I've talked to everyone there is to talk to.
	Well, if he hasn't talked to the mayor, then maybe he hasn't talked to everybody that there is to talk to.
	And, you know, if you think that Pence is going to put a slow burn and a humiliation on Trump, What about Lala Harris?
	Will you all please stand as she enters the room?
	Hello, everybody!
	You can clap!
	It's okay! Except they still don't.
	It seems like every moment with Lala is an awkward moment.
	Even when she says, well, you know, you can clap.
	Kind of reminds us of what?
	The Jeb Bush thing? Where he comes out and goes, please clap.
	When she asked for them to clap, and they still don't clap.
	But there was a whole string of these, as of course there always are, with Lala Harris that were put out by...
	The RNC research team, Republican National Committee research team.
	I like this one about electricity.
	She claims that Biden has reduced heating and electricity bills so folks have more money in their pocket, right?
	Every day, Joe Biden and I talk about and work together with our partners, like former leader Hoyer, current leader Hoyer, to lower the cost for the people of our nation, because you are a leader.
	For working families, we have reduced heating and electricity bills.
	So folks have more money in their pocket to buy things like school supplies, replace the dishwasher, or take a family vacation.
	Or, you know, just buy a dozen eggs, you know.
	They've done so much to lower costs of fuel and electricity.
	Like, what planet is she coming from?
	But, of course, they've gotten accustomed to being able to lie to us about everything, and the media always covers for it.
	RNC says, what is she talking about?
	Electricity is up 11.9%.
	Oil is up 27.7%.
	Natural gas is up 26.7%.
	Over just the last year.
	Well, I thought this was interesting from the Free Thought Project.
	They said it's time to start talking about abolishing the IRS. And, you know, we have had some Republicans who have actually mentioned this, haven't done anything to do it.
	But I remember that was one of the things that we would say when I was working with the Libertarian Party in the late 1980s.
	We would say that, you know, whenever we'd talk to the press, and that was just a non-sequitur.
	Oh, you're crazy. You can't even, you know, you can't seriously think that that is something that could be done.
	And yet, you know, it is something that can be done, something that should be done, something that we don't need to have.
	You know, it's only been around for a little over 100 years, about 110 years, actually.
	1913 was when they created the Federal Reserve.
	I think the IRS internal tax system that we never had before that came in about the same time.
	So it isn't something that was necessary for America to prosper at the beginning, and it is something that has been weaponized against us.
	And even as we look at these 87,000 IRS agents that are going to be put out there to confiscate our wealth and to confiscate most likely our money.
	I don't know.
	See this type of talk.
	But whether or not that will happen remains to be seen, but it is something that should happen, and it is something that, at the very least, you've got to block this effort by Joe Biden to make it seven or eight times bigger than it currently is, because you've got to figure out, you know, why is he doing that, and why is he doing it now?
	So, meanwhile, you have the RNC chair, says, support, there will be a loyalty pledge, That will be required for people to participate in the GOP debates, so that it's a no-brainer.
	Do you remember the very first debate of the 2016 election?
	It was back in September 2015.
	And they went down the list of, I don't know, what was it, about 16 candidates or something like that, and asked them if they would support whoever won the process.
	And I think that was one of the biggest wins for Donald Trump at the time, and one of the biggest losses for Rand Paul.
	Because as they went down, and he goes, well, I don't know.
	I don't know what these guys stand for, and I don't know if I could support them.
	It sounded like he was focused on issues, which we now know he was, and he's focused on...
	He was focused on his ego and defending himself against somebody who had attacked him.
	But, you know, it came across great.
	And the person who came across the biggest loser out of that exchange was Rand Paul, who was absolutely livid.
	That Trump would not put the party first over everything else.
	And so now they're making it clear that that is going to be required to participate in the debates.
	Look, that's required, quite frankly, pretty much to get on the ballot.
	You've got two parties that control everything.
	They control the debates, but they also control the ballot.
	And one of the ways that they control the ballot, even if you call yourself a Republican, try to come up through the system, they will control who gets on the ballot in most cases.
	They don't have as much control at the local level but they still do exercise that type of control.
	I just read you the story last week about what was happening in Florida and the fight that they had there as they were trying to put something in to warn people about these toxic Trump shots.
	So that's what we're going to be looking at.
	There is no political solution to what we're in.
	We need to understand the political danger But we need to understand that the political solution is not in Washington, and it's not in the Republican or the Democrat Party, but it is especially not in Washington.
	It's going to be issue by issue, and we better get that clear.
	clear.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, we have Texas Governor Greg Abbott is now being strongly urged by people who are concerned about the flow of people across the border to have mandatory E-Verify.
	See, this is the reason I said we've got to be very careful about...
	I'm not saying that it's not a problem what is happening at the border.
	It is a problem, and I'll show you one of the reasons why it is a problem here in a different way.
	What has happened in this massive prison that they have in El Salvador just is a testimony to how large and how dangerous these drug cartels like MS-13 and others are.
	But before we get to that...
	You have to understand that whenever you've got a problem...
	I had the same discussion with Democrats when Hillary Clinton was trying to push through the control of healthcare back in the 90s.
	You know, I would go to these...
	I lived in a...
	David Price was a congressman in the district where I lived.
	And a liberal college professor, Democrat.
	And he was...
	Really full pedal to the metal pushing to take over the healthcare system, which interestingly enough didn't happen until Trump.
	It didn't happen under Hillary.
	It happened under Trump. That's when they took it over.
	Anyway, so you had all these people who would get up and speak and said, well, you know, we got problems in the healthcare system.
	It's like, yeah, you know what? You're going to have problems in every institution you got.
	Everything that you do, it's going to be less than perfect.
	But we got all these big problems, and they would talk about a problem and say, I don't know what needs to be done, but something's got to be done.
	We got to do something. It's like, well, you better figure out what you're doing because you could throw on, if you've got a fire here, you might want to figure out what kind of fire it is and what's in your bucket before you throw it on there.
	You might be throwing gasoline on the fire.
	And I think if we have a mandatory e-verify, then that is going to be all the conservatives who are rightfully concerned.
	About some kind of a global digital ID? Rightfully concerned about vaccine passports?
	Are they not concerned about having to have federal government approval and a federal government ID in order to be able to work?
	Are you kidding me? How is that fundamentally different from the vaccine passport if you get right down to it?
	I've got to have this number from the government, and I've got to have their permission to work.
	You know, they're not making you with E-Verify.
	They're not making you get an injection.
	But you don't want to have the other aspect of this as well.
	And so what they're doing is they're saying, well, we've got to remove the reward for illegal aliens.
	Well, the reward for illegal aliens is the illegal welfare system that we have.
	Stop the welfare system.
	That's the obvious solution.
	But instead, they're going to keep the welfare system going.
	And then if you've got somebody who comes across the border and wants to work, oh, well, no, you can't work.
	You know, you come here and get welfare, but you can't work.
	And, oh, by the way, the people who are citizens here, you're going to have to get the government's permission to work.
	It's the worst of everything.
	Pro-American immigration.
	This is from Breitbart. Pro-American immigration reformers, they say.
	I don't think that's pro-American.
	I don't think an ID of anything is pro-American.
	It's pro-Nazi.
	Your identity papers, please?
	Wow, I just want to get a job. Your identity papers, please?
	Immigration reformers are urging Texas Governor Abbott to propose a crackdown on illegal immigration similar to plans already issued by, listen, Ron DeSantis.
	As Breitbart News reported, DeSantis detailed a legislative package that includes mandating E-Verify across the state for all employers.
	This is the guy who pushed back on vaccine passports, but now he wants to have an employment passport.
	What's the difference with that?
	Do you understand the danger? I hope you do.
	Now, I'm adamantly opposed to that.
	He had four other proposals that I think were good.
	Increasing criminal penalties for human smugglers.
	Fine. Prohibiting counties from issuing driver's licenses to illegal aliens.
	Fine. You're not a resident.
	You don't get a driver's license.
	Banning out-of-state waivers for illegal aliens.
	Fine. Making it a felony for illegal aliens to use false identities to gain employment.
	I'm fine with all four of those.
	But when you look at this mandating e-verify, you've got to have a job passport.
	Seriously. You know, it's just so hard to tell who's from this country and who's not.
	It's really difficult to tell when someone has just crossed the border illegally and come to your place of your establishment to get a job.
	You know, it's just really difficult.
	You can't tell. That's right.
	And of course, you're being sarcastic.
	Yeah, they would know.
	They would know. Yeah. When they've gone in and busted, you know, like a chicken processing plant.
	And they hired a bunch of illegals because they can get them very cheap.
	They knew what they were doing. They were paying them less than minimum wage and all the rest of the stuff.
	They knew exactly what they were doing. But look, the bottom line is that we know because of Cloward and Piven, this was a process.
	They wanted to destroy this country with welfare.
	It wasn't working. So I said, well, let's open up the welfare to people who are not citizens and open up the borders and we can collapse the country and we can institute our system.
	The Great Reset is nothing new.
	It's been around for a while.
	Cloward and Piven was at the center of all that.
	But the bottom line is, you know, and I've said this before, you know, you go through and back in the day they would have the Nolan chart, which mapped out political...
	Understandings and beliefs, you know, liberty versus government control, and so they would have 10 questions on economic freedom and 10 questions on civil liberties, but I never got a perfect score on it because I was not in favor of open borders as long as the welfare state is here.
	You've got to understand what Cloward and Piven is about.
	You have to understand the practical aspects of this.
	So if you can't get rid of the welfare system, at least do it for foreign citizens who have not bothered to apply for citizenship.
	If they want to come here and work cheaply, that's a different situation.
	That's not nearly as bad as them coming here and going on welfare.
	But still, the idea that we should have to have a job passport.
	That ought to be rejected out of hand, and yet we've got DeSantis and Abbott now pushing this.
	So the people who are the supposed pro-American group that Breitbart is talking about said, we applaud Governor DeSantis for taking the lead and proposing...
	Impactful reforms, expanding e-verify, and prohibiting in-state tuition for illegal aliens.
	I'm in favor of prohibiting in-state tuition for illegal aliens.
	As a matter of fact, I don't want any public funding of universities of any kind because of what they're teaching.
	These are two of our top three legislative priorities, they said.
	We must fully execute the use of E-Verify as it is intended and hold those willing to hire illegal aliens accountable.
	Well, the bottom line is that they've found people, you know, as I said, bust factories and everything, and yet they don't hold the individuals accountable.
	So do that first before you force everybody to have a job ID. It's time to take the next step and work with the legislature to mandate E-Verify for all public and private.
	Entities and the state.
	No, it isn't. That is the wrong approach.
	It's an anti-freedom approach for us.
	We will be the ones who will...
	This is like gun control, right?
	What does gun control do? Does it take it away from the hands of people who are criminals?
	No, it takes it away from the people who are law-abiding citizens.
	This is going to not stop any illegal immigration.
	Instead, it's going to punish and control Americans.
	That's what the E-Verify system is going to do.
	Minnesota Democrats, meanwhile, are giving driver's licenses to 77,000 illegal aliens.
	Well, again, I'm against driver's licenses in principle anyway.
	But I definitely don't want them to have this because they're going to be using it as a voter ID. That's one of the things there in Tennessee.
	One of the reasons Tennessee is Republican and neighboring North Carolina is Democrat is because in North Carolina they will not allow voter ID. You know, not going to have it.
	Whereas in Tennessee, they do have it.
	In California, one of the first states to pass such a law, more than a million illegal aliens have been allowed to secure driver's licenses since 2015.
	And I'm sure they're using them to vote with.
	Now, I want to have you take a look at this.
	And I'll kind of describe it for people listening on radio.
	You may have seen this picture anyway.
	This is going viral. Thousands of tattooed inmates...
	Pictured in an El Salvador mega prison.
	This is the first group of 2,000 suspects.
	They're coming in. You can see how heavily they're tattooed because they got them stripped down to their boxer shorts.
	Look at this. Sea of humanity.
	This is 2,000. This prison, 2,000 prisoners, all on the floor, you know, squatting on the floor with their hands behind their heads, all lined up.
	And this is the first 2,000 of 40,000 That they're going to put in this prison.
	This is like escape from New York.
	They told them, you're never going to get out of here.
	You're going to be here the rest of your life.
	And this is how big the gains are in tiny El Salvador.
	That's one of the things to take away from this.
	To see how, you know, first of all, how horrific this is.
	Can you imagine being put in this situation for the rest of your life?
	And of course, not to say that these guys don't deserve this kind of treatment.
	I support capital punishment if there's appropriate due process.
	But then that's the question. Is there appropriate due process with this?
	Prisoners are left sitting on the floor with their hands behind their shaven heads, stacked closely together before being taken to their cells.
	And as they point out, the president declared a war on gangs last March, pressed emergency measures which have been extended several times.
	The emergency powers have been controversial as they limit constitutional rights, you see.
	When you start to see something like that, you can kind of guess that that is going to be a part of the formula.
	Limiting constitutional rights such as allowing security forces to arrest suspects without a warrant.
	Well, that kind of tells you something.
	Although, you know, you see these guys have got it written all over their heads and their bodies that they are MS-13.
	So, in...
	In El Salvador, where it's not just the MS-13, but they've got a couple of different gangs that are along those lines.
	People have had it with it. And I think that is one of the reasons why you have these Soros district attorneys that are literally hell-bent on making sure that no one goes to jail for shoplifting.
	You don't stay in jail even if you commit a violent crime.
	They want to create...
	The kind of violence that is in El Salvador with these drug cartel gangs.
	They want to create that kind of violence because they know that the pushback against it is going to be for them to say, all right, we've had enough.
	Forget about due process.
	Forget about constitutional rights.
	We've got to stop this by all means.
	That's why Soros and his district attorneys and his state attorneys general, that's why they are doing this type of thing.
	They want to try to push us into that strategy.
	If you go back and you look at the Bader-Meinhof gang and the Red Brigade and others, they openly admitted, these Marxist organizations, that they wanted to go on terrorist campaigns because they wanted to have a law and order pushback that was going to push them into an authoritarian government.
	They admitted that was their strategy.
	That is the strategy.
	They want to do that everywhere.
	And if you look at the most violent cities in the world, the 50 most violent cities, 38 of them are in Latin America.
	It's one of the reasons why they've opened up the border.
	38 of the 50 most violent cities in the world are in Latin America.
	17 of them are in Mexico.
	So by all means, open up the border because we want to have as many drug gangs as possible.
	And our drug war has made that possible.
	We put these people in business with a drug war just as assuredly as we put Al Capone in business with alcohol prohibition and that kind of corruption.
	As a matter of fact, I've told the story many times.
	I'll tell it one more time real quickly because we're about out of time.
	But the father of his daughter who was killed in Long Island, they were from El Salvador, he said, I came all the way here.
	He was an illegal alien. He said, I came all the way here to try to get away from MS-13.
	But his daughter was in a Long Island school, and they had these kids that were being kept there because of the, you know, Deferred Action Program, DACA. And they were MS-13.
	It was literally tattooed all over their bodies, their faces, and everything else.
	She had an argument with one of them, or a girl that had boyfriends that were in that, and they killed her.
	He goes, what do I have to do?
	I came all the way here to try to escape these people, all the way to Long Island, New York.
	Well, the problem is, is that if the border is completely uncontrolled, then there's nothing, and you can come through.
	So can the bad people that you're trying to escape.
	38, Of the 50 most violent cities in Latin America, 17 of the most violent cities of the 50 most violent cities in Mexico alone.
	And so, in one respect, you know, you take a look at the total chaos that's being pushed in these Democrat-controlled cities in order to try to stop shoplifting.
	In New York City now, they're getting canine programs.
	You got somebody standing there with a German Shepherd and signs saying this will be used against shoplifters.
	that's what they are pushing us into, simply because they won't enforce the laws.
	And also, the flip side of it, because the police who have been pushed by the Democrats into a shoot-first training, so they've taken the police, made them dangerous.
	The Soros attorneys are releasing the criminals.
	Thank you.
	The Common Man .
	Bye. Bye.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.

▲