Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 1, 2019 - The David Knight Show

02:59:42

20190501_Wed_Knight

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	♪♪ Welcome, it's Mayday!
	Things are really stepping up.
	Not only did we have a revolt in Venezuela, some call it a coup, some dispute that idea that it's a coup.
	We have the military-industrial complex, of course, has been pushing this heavily.
	We have CNN joining with the Trump administration.
	We have Joe Biden joining with the Trump administration.
	We have people joining together in the streets of Venezuela, and yet the military appears to be able to shut this down.
	Why is that?
	Well, it's because they have all the guns, right?
	So, even if the people want to overthrow Bernie Sanders-style socialism that they've gotten good and hard in Venezuela, people are starving there.
	We'll talk about how this came to pass.
	I'm not in favor of using our military to overthrow other countries.
	Not at all.
	But we're going to look at this situation that's happening in Venezuela and I want to compare it to a series of tweets put out by individuals who were with the Korean American community in the LA riots after the Rodney King incident.
	They used the Second Amendment to defend themselves.
	And when we see people getting mowed down by the military, when this whole balance of power that is happening in Venezuela is not up to elections, it's up to the military.
	Which side is the military going to take?
	This is why it makes me very, very concerned when I see people like former General McChrystal, who was in charge of Afghanistan.
	When I see people like him, Telling people like me that we're not allowed to have weapons.
	Because, you know, that's a military weapon.
	The military has to have the best firearms.
	I look at what's going on in Venezuela.
	I look at what happened in LA in the wake of those riots.
	And we're going to take a look at the State of the Second Amendment and how it's under threat.
	Not only from Democrats, but from Republicans as well.
	These red flag gun laws, folks, you ought to call it a red flag.
	Put a hammer and a sickle on that red flag.
	Because Mao knew exactly what this was about.
	He said, power comes out of the barrel of a gun, I'm going to have all the guns.
	That's precisely what is going on in Venezuela right now.
	I think that's the lesson for us to learn.
	Now if this fails, the US military wants this so badly, the military-industrial complex, they'll probably do an invasion there.
	I will not support that.
	Under any circumstances will I support that.
	That is not our responsibility.
	We need to learn the lessons of socialism.
	We need to learn the lessons of gun control as exhibited in Venezuela.
	We're going to talk about that coming up.
	We're also going to talk about, we're going to have a, we're going to join the testimony by Attorney General Barr when he goes to the Senate today.
	It's going to be in about an hour, I think our time.
	Anyway, that Barr brawl that's going to break out in the Senate, we'll give you a lead up to that.
	We'll talk about the letter that has come out by Mueller.
	I think we should call it the Epistle of St.
	Mueller.
	Because folks, this really is a religious issue with the Democrats.
	When we look at, they made a less redacted report available to the Senate, since they're going to be questioning Attorney General Barr today.
	And they said, well, let six Democrats and six Republicans look at it.
	Now, I don't know why they're restricting what people can see.
	Quite frankly, they're restricting what Roger Stone can see, even though he believes that he has a right to see this, and I think he does, because it's probably exculpatory.
	In other words, it probably would help him to prove his innocence, but they're going to withhold that from him.
	We've seen this happen time and time again.
	With Schaefer Cox, with Ross Ulbrich, with the Bundys, on and on and on.
	That's the way the Department of Justice, the corrupt Department of Justice, rolls.
	But, when we look at this situation, they made a less redacted report available.
	It said 6 Republicans and 6 Democrats can do it.
	You know how many looked at it?
	Bothered to even look at it?
	Out of the 12?
	Only 2.
	That means 17% of the Senators bothered to look at it.
	Out of that, the two were both Republicans.
	That means 33% of the Republicans looked at it, 0% of the Democrats.
	But boy, they're going to be interested today when they get Attorney General Barr in front of them.
	You just wait and see.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Nourish a probiotic-friendly environment in your gut with Prebiotic Fiber by InfoWars Life.
	Help the good bacteria thrive and support overall digestive health with our specially formulated Prebiotic Fiber, a mixture of clinically studied and organic acacia, fruit, and flax fiber.
	Prebiotic fiber is soluble fiber that ferments in the gut to help feed good bacteria, which helps you digest food, absorb nutrients, and even support your immune system.
	InfoWars Life's cutting-edge formula only brings you the highest quality, organic, and clinically studied ingredients.
	Cheap prebiotic fibers are used up only at the beginning of the colon, but our premium organic acacia fiber is slowly digested by the good bacteria throughout the entire colon for maximum prebiotic effect.
	Head to infowarslife.com or call 1-888-253-3139.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	And now, the David Night Show.
	♪♪♪ Welcome on this May Day, here of our Lord's Christmas.
	This is the day that communists celebrate.
	So what better time to overthrow the communists in Venezuela?
	We'll talk about what's going on there, but I'm going to really take a look coming up here at what's going on in Venezuela in the context of the Second Amendment and the right to keep and bear arms.
	I think the important lesson for us to take away from this is we don't ever want to have this happen in America.
	We don't want the socialism That is represented by Maduro, by Chavez, the corruption and the socialism that is being offered to us by all of the Democrat candidates, especially Bernie Sanders.
	I call him Bernie Sandernista because he went to Nicaragua and just praised the Sandernistas one side and down the other.
	The Sandernistas could do no wrong to Bernie Sanders.
	That's why I call him Bernie Sandernista.
	But he's also Stalinist Bernie.
	He went to the Soviet Union for his honeymoon in 1986.
	Three years before the whole thing collapsed in a heap.
	And it was already a rotten core.
	Everybody understood it except for Bernie Sanders.
	We can see what's going on in Venezuela.
	Venezuela should be a lesson to us as to the results of socialism.
	And what is going on right now should be a lesson to us as to why we never, in America, will let the government take our guns.
	But let's not make the mistake that we have made time and time again in recent history and get involved in regime change.
	Let's not do that.
	I'm sorry this is happening to the Venezuelan people, but it's their fight, not ours.
	We have Joe Biden and CNN backing Guaido.
	They're waiting for Guaido over Maduro.
	They said the violence in Venezuela today is against peaceful protesters, writes Biden on Twitter.
	He says the violence against peaceful protesters is criminal.
	Maduro's regime is responsible for incredible suffering.
	Alright, so far, I agree, 100%.
	The U.S.
	must stand with the National Assembly and WIDO in their efforts to restore democracy through legitimate, internationally monitored elections.
	Well, if that means we send our tanks down there to run over people, no, I don't agree with that.
	And I want to cover a little bit of news before we get into this. We've had as an update here, many of you remember that in Minnesota, the area that elected Keith Ellison, the first Muslim member of Congress, who refused to take the oath of office, swearing in on a Bible, that was a traditional thing.
	He demanded a Koran to swear in.
	Then he moved on to higher office there in the state.
	His power base there in Minnesota consists of relocated Somali Muslims.
	His position was taken by Ilhan Omar.
	Who has exhibited hatred and hostility to the United States, especially over things like the Battle of Mogadishu.
	Resentful about what she was given here.
	This privileged person who has been given refuge here, given food, given clothing, now given a seat in Congress.
	And she seems to hate everything about America.
	But in Minnesota there, Little Mogadishu, as the people who live there called it, We have a power base there of Muslims.
	Somali Muslims.
	So they decided that they would cut some corners for this Somali cop who subsequently executed an Australian yoga teacher, Justine Diamond.
	You remember that?
	They called the police.
	This is a lesson.
	We'll talk about this coming up when we get to the L.A.
	riots and look at what happened in L.A., the people who exercised their Second Amendment rights.
	But instead of Taking precautions.
	She and other people with her called the police because they were fearful of something.
	The police showed up and this Somali police officer, Mohammed Noor, who was essentially shoved through the training program pretty quickly because they needed to have identity cops for their identity politics, got scared and shot and killed her.
	A Minneapolis jury has found him guilty yesterday of third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.
	He had also been charged with second-degree murder, found not guilty on that, but found guilty on third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.
	And in an update to the Islamic community here, I'm sure you've seen by now the pictures on the Drudge Report, of this Sports Illustrated swimsuit model.
	You know, here's a business model for this magazine.
	Their business model is, for the swimsuit edition at the very least, it's nothing other than soft core porn.
	They wear as little as possible, sometimes nothing at all, just paint.
	And then they have a fully clothed, wearing a hijab and a burkini model, and they say that they want to celebrate this.
	And I just really have a problem with that.
	You know, I don't have a problem with modesty.
	There's a lot of people, a lot of women, who decide voluntarily that they will dress modestly.
	But here you have the hypocrisy of Sports Illustrated.
	I just remind the people at Sports Illustrated that if you were to publish your magazine in Saudi Arabia, they'd cut your head off and stick it on a pole, okay?
	That's the reality of Sharia law.
	That's the reality of the system that you are celebrating.
	And if you want to put somebody on the cover, if you want to put an Islamic woman on the cover to celebrate liberation, then I would suggest before they execute her that you get the female lawyer who has defended time and again women in Iran who wanted to take off their burqa in public And they were going to put them in jail.
	She successfully defended them many times, so they came after her.
	She's going to get 38 years in jail and 148 lashes.
	As I said before, she may not survive the 148 lashes.
	So she may not have to serve 38 years in jail.
	But she is the one who is pushing for liberation.
	The difference between somebody who wants to dress modestly and this woman here is that she has to cover up or be punished.
	In Islam.
	In Islam, if she doesn't cover up, she will get the lashes, she will get imprisoned, she'll get her head cut off, whatever.
	That's why I say this is absolute hypocrisy and propaganda.
	Karl Marx was absolutely right when he said that the capitalists will sell the rope that is used to hang them.
	And in this case, you've got Sports Illustrated.
	Selling the sword that will be used to cut off their head.
	Absolutely disgusting.
	And we have Captain Marvel star Brie Larson out there whining about the lack of LGBTQ representation in Marvel films.
	You know, again, people like Brie Larson will be the first ones to go to jail.
	First ones to get thrown off the building.
	First ones to get their heads cut off.
	It would create an interesting secret identity.
	Think about it.
	It'd be kind of like a Modrioski doll, right?
	You know, which identity is this person going to go with?
	A trans superhero?
	You know, you got a superhero drag queen and it's... I don't know if they're male or female, if they're dressing up or whatever.
	I mean, it would be a real convoluted situation.
	But that's not what she's really about, as one person tweeted out.
	Brie Larson is going to single-handedly kill a great movie franchise.
	Eh, maybe it's about time.
	Yeah, I think it probably is about time.
	Especially when we look at this transgender athlete smashing four women's powerlifting records.
	We reported on this at InfoWars.
	The transgender athlete, born a man, biologically a man, Again, whenever they talk about LGBTQ, we have B.O.B.
	Biological, Objective, and Binary.
	That's what this is truly about, folks.
	We've got an Olympian that has been, well, the female equivalent of knighted.
	Olympian Dame Kelly Holmes commented after a former swimming champion Sharon Davies said, this is someone with a male body, with male physiology, setting a world record and winning a women's event in America in powerlifting.
	A woman with female biology cannot compete.
	It's a pointless, unfair playing field.
	And then Dame Sharon Davies said it is a pointless, said it's absolutely pointless.
	It is a bloody joke.
	Tell that to Brie Larson.
	As she wants to, maybe we could replace her character Captain Marvel with Corporal Klinger.
	I'd like to see Corporal Klinger flying through the air and tagging people.
	At least he could do it for her.
	It'd be entertaining and funny.
	But we'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Our grandparents and great-grandparents knew that they canned food during the fall so they'd have it during the winter.
	And that's what I'm talking about at MFootwearStore.com.
	With MFootwear Select, it's the full spectrum of my patriotic supply.
	Most respected companies out there.
	But because I private label it, I'm able to go below cost on contracts that all their other distributors aren't able to do.
	But I want to be a market leader, and I want you to have storable food, so it's a total win-win.
	We have those incredible sell prices back.
	MFORWARDSTORE.COM on MFORWARDSELECT storable foods.
	They've got special diet foods.
	They've got three-month supplies, year supplies, week emergency supplies.
	They've got so many great products there.
	Maybe you've got a three-year supply.
	If stuff happens, you can feed your whole block.
	It's up to us to be self-sufficient.
	You're buying War Bonds, bringing you great products, and together, with God's help, we are unstoppable.
	MFullMoreStore.com and MFullMoreSelect, high quality, storable foods powered by my Patriot Supply.
	By leaps and by bounds, the number one best-selling supplement family in the world is energy drinks and energy supplements.
	But they are riddled with dyes and toxins and synthetic caffeines and other chemicals that sure get you a quick boost, but burn out in just a few hours and have terrible side effects.
	We have developed, hands down from our research, the most powerful, healthy energy drink pre-workout and beyond system in the world.
	There's nothing else like it.
	You must experience it.
	It is a total game-changer.
	And it comes in easy-to-use packets to mix in with fruit juice or water, whatever you'd like.
	Warning, though, it's very, very strong.
	It lasts up to 10 hours.
	So take a half packet the first time you take it because TurboForce is named TurboForce because it will take you into overdrive.
	TurboForce at m4slive.com.
	You deserve a deep restful sleep with Knockout by InfoWars Life.
	Our organic formula is made from high quality natural ingredients such as valerian root extract, L-tryptophan, lemon balm leaf extract, and melatonin.
	Knockout packs a powerful punch to get you through the night and achieve proper sleep.
	Millions of people around the world experience daytime drowsiness, but with the rapid speed of life, we need to be able to keep up the pace.
	Our natural mixture harnesses the power of 10 known ingredients to let your body relax and get the sleep you need.
	Wake up refreshed and take on the day.
	InfoWarsLife wants to bring you a sleep support formula that goes above and beyond other leading brands at an affordable price.
	Get the sleep you deserve and experience the power of knockout.
	Head on over to InfoWarsLife.com and say goodbye to fatigue.
	That's InfoWarsLife.com BrainForce Plus is a top-tier nootropic.
	Focus.
	Clarity.
	Energy.
	But instead of having a 7x markup, we have a 150% markup.
	Right now, it's massively discounted.
	And when you get a bottle of it at 25% off, you get a free bottle of what is our total bestseller.
	It's not very profitable because we give it at such a low price, but it's amazing.
	And that, of course, is knockout, the ultimate sleep aid.
	So we've got a way to energize you, ramp you up in a healthy way during the day.
	And put you deep into that restful, healthy sleep at night.
	It's the Brain Force and Knockout Combo Deal.
	25% off Brain Force and a free bottle of Knockout together right now.
	Get the combo and experience both these great products today.
	Take advantage of it and fund the InfoWars.
	InfoWarsLife.com or InfoWarsStore.com.
	The Brain Force Plus Knockout Combo right now.
	Get your free bottle today at InfowarsStore.com.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	I'm David and welcome to the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	I want to talk about what's going on in Venezuela.
	And I want to talk about the lessons that it teaches us here in America.
	Not just about why we don't want socialism.
	Not just about how democracy is not sufficient to protect us and to protect our individual rights, but also why we need the Second Amendment.
	Because as this is happening, we're going through the anniversary of the LA riots after Rodney King.
	And we've got a long Twitter thread of people who were part of the, they call them the rooftop Koreans.
	These are people who came legally, emigrated from South Korea.
	They had served in the military, they had compulsory service, they knew how to use firearms, and they came to America where they were allowed to have firearms.
	And they learned a very important lesson About how the police and the government, when it hits the fan, are not going to be there to have your back.
	They're not going to be there to protect you.
	So I want to begin, let's go back to this last weekend, the NRA speech where President Trump Dropped out, officially, out of the Global Arms Treaty, according to MSN.
	Let me give a news flash to MSN.
	We were never in a treaty.
	A treaty, if you want to call it a treaty, understand it has to be ratified by the Senate.
	Two-thirds of the Senate.
	That never happened.
	It was self-ratified, like so many of these things, by President Obama.
	In the same way that he knew that he didn't have the votes to get into the Paris Climate Accord, That's a treaty also.
	He said, well, I'm going to self-ratify it.
	Well, that doesn't have any effect and President Trump took that out.
	He did the agreement with Iran.
	And everybody was saying, you don't have the authority to do this.
	You have to get Congress to ratify this.
	And you even had a lot of Republican senators saying, if we have a Republican president They're going to get out of this agreement with Iran.
	Now regardless of what you think about the agreement, whether you think it's a good agreement or a bad agreement or whatever, he didn't have the authority to do it.
	It's a non-starter.
	And when I hear the Iranian politicians say, well this is really bad for the United States to join something and then renege on their agreement and so forth, read the press reports, read our Constitution.
	I know you probably don't care because most of our American politicians don't care about the Constitution.
	Obama didn't.
	And so I can't really expect an Iranian politician to care about that, but he was put on notice by many people saying, this is totally ineffective and non-binding, so it shouldn't have come as any kind of a surprise to the Iranians.
	And here's another one, the UN Arms Trade Treaty.
	And as they point out rightfully in this MSN report, the origins of the treaty, they say, Which sets out international rules for sales and transfers of everything.
	From small arms to large planes and ships.
	No, it was focused on small arms folks.
	But they say, the origins of this treaty date back to the George W. Bush administration.
	And that's a very important point.
	I'm glad they put that in there.
	Now they put that in there because they want to say, oh look how out of touch President Trump is.
	No, I want you to understand how much of a globalist the Bush family is.
	Because we understand that really what the purpose of this was.
	They're going to say we've got a massive problem with small arms.
	That's what you and I have.
	We have a massive problem with small arms crossing the border.
	Now the only way that we're going to be able to control this Is if we can, once we find the gun or the ammunition, we can trace the ownership back to those rascally American gun owners.
	And that means that you're going to have to record every single thing about every piece of equipment, every firearm, every bullet, and every American and tie those things together.
	It was a backdoor for complete gun control.
	And in order to create a scenario under which they could push this U.N.
	Arms Trade Treaty through, they had the gun-walking program.
	Long before the Fast and Furious program, George W. Bush began pushing the U.N.
	agenda to control and to take away firearms and the Second Amendment.
	And the gun-walking program that eventually blew up with Fast and Furious under the Obama administration, That was created by the Bush administration to create the impression that we needed to have some kind of a treaty to control this.
	And so you had the federal government pushing arms across, hoping that they would have a blowback, and then they could say, see this is a problem and we've got something to fix it.
	Even the New York Times, when Fast and Furious blew up, called it a false flag operation.
	Even the New York Times did.
	And it was.
	And it was a false flag operation that began under George W. Bush.
	I mean, he'd gotten away with 9-11.
	He could get rid of the small little tattered fragments of the Bill of Rights very easily using that.
	And I was there in New York the day that they had the vote.
	I was covering that for a gun organization.
	My sons and I were there covering it.
	And I remember that very well, and I remember that just the week before, because this whole Fast and Furious thing blew up in their face so badly because a federal agent was killed.
	They didn't care how many people in Central and South America were killed by their illegal arms running.
	That was just going to be used as a case to make this.
	But when a federal agent got killed, people started investigating, and then it blew up.
	They realized it was a false flag, and it was going to scuttle The U.N.
	Arms Trade Treaty.
	And so one week before, just coincidentally, they had a big mass shooting in Aurora, Colorado.
	Isn't that convenient?
	Still, that was not enough to push this through.
	So Obama ratified it by himself.
	And now President Trump has gotten rid of it.
	And I'm glad that he did that.
	He said, we will never allow foreign bureaucrats to trample on your Second Amendment freedom.
	I'm officially announcing today the U.S.
	will be revoking the effect of America's signature from this badly misguided treaty.
	Well, President Trump misspoke about that last part there.
	I'm glad he got rid of it.
	But it wasn't America's signature.
	America's signature is put on a treaty when the Senate ratifies it.
	And they didn't.
	It was Obama's signature and it was not a treaty.
	There was no effect.
	We have to be careful about the language that we use.
	But nevertheless, he got rid of it, and I'm glad that he did it.
	He did it this last weekend at the NRA convention.
	However, however, when we look at things like the red flag gun laws, we now have GOP Governor Mike DeWine in Ohio, the guy who took the place of, what's his name?
	I can't remember.
	The pathetic guy who... Anyway.
	He's now Republican governor in Ohio.
	Kasich.
	John Kasich.
	He took Kasich's place.
	Mike DeWine said on Monday his administration is drawing up red flag legislation that would allow authorities to confiscate guns from those deemed to be a threat to themselves or others.
	And people said, well, it seems like you've got a lot of support from the NRA.
	And he goes, oh, well, the NRA doesn't have a problem with this.
	I said, well, I have due process.
	No, if you look at these red flag gun laws, they do not give you due process.
	Quite frankly, President Trump was painfully transparent when he said, we'll take the guns and do the due process later.
	Just like AOC told us the truth about the Green New Deal and all of the establishment Democrats were cringing.
	Well, that's President Trump told us what this is really.
	It's not about due process.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	I want to salute and commend every man, woman, and child that has supported this broadcast over the years and that has stood with us.
	And I want to thank all of our sponsors and all of our affiliates.
	But I'll tell you like it is.
	You've seen the unmitigated attack we've been under.
	You're our only sponsors.
	And when you don't buy the products that are absolutely the best out there, we aren't able to continue on.
	So remember, you are the InfoWar.
	I'm not the leader, you are the leader.
	When you take action, nothing stops you.
	We've got giant specials running right now at InfoWarsStore.com that are unprecedented.
	And if you go there and buy great products that you already need from across the board, it funds the second American Revolution worldwide.
	So I want to thank you for your support, and I want to encourage you again.
	Go to InfoWarsStore.com for whatever the product is you need.
	We have thousands of them, and it makes this all possible.
	Thank you for making InfoWars possible.
	God bless you.
	I want to say brain force is great.
	I want to say turbo force is amazing.
	It is.
	But if you took it with fish oil, it's like the fish oil is it.
	The fish oil is better than it.
	And that's an example of what I'm talking about.
	Fish oil is liquid energy.
	Brain, body, heart, the cleanest, the best out there.
	You've got the children's.
	You've got the adults.
	You've got the krill oil.
	If you're going to get the full effect, the fish oil and the children's are really strong.
	They don't give you the burpees, but krill oil is the best.
	And it'll give you the damn burps.
	And I'm sorry.
	You want something like this?
	You don't get stuff for free.
	The krill is hallucinogenic.
	It's so good.
	In my view.
	I'm not making a medical statement here, but let me tell you something.
	When I eat five caplets of krill oil before I go to bed, I'm seeing Santa Claus that night.
	So, your brain is made basically out of what fish oil is.
	So we don't make a big profit off of it, but you notice I just obsess because whatever the best is we've got, I just can't lie to you.
	I just can't do it!
	Frank in North Carolina, thanks for holding so long.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, Alex, I just have to say something, man.
	It seems like every time I turn on your broadcast, you're bragging.
	It just gets old, man.
	I'm gonna shut you down right now, okay?
	We're taking calls about your nomination.
	Do you understand they're having congressional hearings trying to shut us down?
	Do you understand I'm ringing the alarm?
	If that was happening to anybody else, I'd be freaked out.
	I mean, what's it gonna take?
	Us being shut down?
	Is that what you want, Frank?
	You know what, Alex?
	Put him on pause again.
	Hey, Frank!
	Do you understand it's not bragging to say, we are the tip of the spear, we're under attack, we need your help.
	As much bagging as I do, we can barely pay the bills and grow in the face of this.
	I'm not gonna just stop growth and let them start pushing us backwards.
	You understand?
	I need your help, Frank!
	I need your help, Frank!
	Go to Infowarsstore.com right now and help fund the InfoWars.
	Do you understand?
	I need your help, Frank!
	Free Press needs your help, Frank!
	Infowarsstore.com is how you support us, and it's not like we're selling stuff you don't need, you don't want.
	The air in the average American home is filled with toxins that put it on par with a major city.
	Some of the most polluted areas on earth are major cities.
	How can I solve that problem?
	So we have air filters at Infowarsstore.com, the Alexa Pure Breeze, which is right now $50 off.
	The Alexa Pure Breeze groundbreaking ion cluster air filter technology.
	And we've got a limited quantity of these left right now.
	We're basically selling these at cost because there was a big overhaul.
	Go ahead and read the hundreds of five-star reviews for yourself.
	I've got two in my home.
	You will notice the difference, ladies and gentlemen, with the Alexa Pure Breeze in your house.
	Don't live In a polluted major city in your home, have clean air.
	Go to InfoWarsStore.com You're listening to the David Knight Show you You Liberty.
	Do any black swerve, use me any time you want.
	Just remember that the goal is for us all to capture all we want.
	Liberty, it's your move.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Move on yourself, with yourself, move on.
	Welcome back.
	You know, as we look at what's happening in Venezuela, we have people lining up on both sides of this issue, debating whether or not we should get involved in regime change in Venezuela.
	I agree with the founding principles of this country, as expressed by John Adams.
	He said, we do not go abroad seeking monsters to destroy.
	If we do that, The tools to do that abroad are going to be used to destroy us here at home as well.
	And we've seen a lot of that already.
	Too much of that in America.
	So I want to take a look at what's going on in Venezuela and I want to use it as a context to talk about how vital the Second Amendment is here in this country.
	You think that kind of stuff can't happen in this country?
	Look at Bernie Sanders and the Democrat Party.
	They've essentially embraced the economic and political policies of Chavez and Maduro in Venezuela.
	And I've talked many, many times about why Venezuela is Exhibit A and why we don't want socialism here.
	But it's also Exhibit A as to why we don't want gun control here.
	And of course, it's always the socialists who take control from people.
	You know, gun control is not about controlling guns.
	It's about controlling people.
	And these people who want control over every facet of your life, We always fall into corruption as well.
	We always create these kleptocracies.
	Rule by thieves.
	And this is the lesson that we need to take from this.
	And folks, we have to understand that sometimes the enemy of our freedom comes from those that say that they're on our side.
	And it pains me to say this.
	But I think that the NRA and President Trump have been responsible for some very serious infringements on the Second Amendment.
	And I will not compromise on those rights, even to support the NRA or President Trump.
	When they're right on many other issues, but they compromise, remember that it was the NRA who signed on to the gun control laws of Bill Clinton.
	And Sheriff Mack, a constitutional sheriff, he's now got a constitutional sheriff's organization, he and some others said, we're not going to enforce that unconstitutional law.
	They fought it all the way to the Supreme Court.
	They won.
	They defeated Bill Clinton and the NRA in the Supreme Court.
	And so when I look at these red flag gun laws, this is something that the NRA and Republican governors and President Trump have decided that they're going to shave off bits and pieces of the Second Amendment and throw them to the wolves because they think they can appease the gun grabbers.
	You know that doesn't work.
	You know appeasement doesn't work.
	And so we're going to talk about what's going on in Venezuela in the context of the right to keep and bear arms.
	And we're going to talk about what happened In L.A., nearly 30 years ago, and how the people there, legal immigrants from Korea, defended their lives, defended their property, defended their businesses, when the police would not do it.
	You know, when I look at this situation, and this red flag gun laws, it should be a red flag to you.
	It makes me as mad as a bull when I see them waving these laws at people, saying, well, you know, we're going to let authorities confiscate guns from anybody that A friend, a neighbor, a relative complains about, they just take the gun, right?
	And I've said many times, if you've got somebody who's dangerous, it's not enough to take the gun.
	It's not enough.
	And don't you ever, ever say, we're going to take the guns and do the due process later.
	Shame on you, President Trump.
	What a tyrannical thing to say.
	And, you know, we look at the bragging, the boasting.
	By Kamala Harris saying, when I'm elected, I'll give them 100 days to enact gun control, and if they don't do it, I'll do it by executive order.
	Where did she get that idea?
	Well, from President Trump, who enacted gun control for bump stocks.
	It's not an important thing in and of itself, but he set a very important, very dangerous precedent by saying something that has never been regulated, not even by Obama, never regulated by the BATF, I'm going to regulate by executive order.
	I have a big problem with that.
	A big problem with that.
	And Kamala Harris understands that precedent that's been set.
	I said when he did it, I said, you watch.
	Democrats are going to start talking about gun control by executive order already.
	And she won't be the last one to say that.
	So if you think that leaving the dangerous person out there, but taking away their guns just on accusation, because they don't do the due process later.
	That's the whole point.
	You don't take the gun and do the due process later.
	You take the gun and don't give anybody due process.
	We've seen this happen too often.
	You know, we've got people under the war on drugs.
	They take the car, they take the home, they take the cash, and then they don't do the due process later.
	They take the children with CPS and they don't do the due process later either.
	So now you're going to take our guns and do the due process later?
	Yeah, that wasn't a gaffe.
	That is a method of operation from the federal government that President Trump was telling you about.
	You know, we hear Nancy Pelosi saying, well I gotta pass Obamacare so we can find out what's in it.
	That was not a gaffe.
	That was a moment of candor.
	We understand that they create the bureaucracies and then the bureaucracies write the rules.
	Congress has abdicated their legislative authority.
	We have a government Well, we are taxed and regulated without representation now.
	But let's take a look at whether or not this works or not, right?
	I mean, you know, the guns are dangerous, so certainly you won't take it from anybody.
	Even if they're accused of being dangerous, you don't have to prove that they're dangerous.
	You don't have to give them a real trial.
	You can do it ex parte.
	You know, just one side comes in, like a grand jury or something.
	Well, take a look at Britain.
	The gun ban that they've had there is not working.
	You've still got people dying of gunshots.
	But now they're going to have knife banning.
	See, the person is the one that's dangerous.
	It used to be that the NRA and other people, and they still use this slogan, guns don't kill people, people kill people.
	But they obviously don't believe it when it comes to the red flag gun law.
	Because it's the person who's dangerous.
	You leave that dangerous person out there, even if you take their gun, They can use a knife, they can use an axe, they can use a car, they can use a club, they can pick up a rock.
	It's the person who is dangerous.
	So they're going to ban knives.
	As Reason reported, having failed to disarm criminals with gun controls that they defy, British politicians are now turning their attention to implementing something new and different.
	Knife control.
	Because criminals will be much more respectful of knife laws than they are of those that target firearms, I guess.
	No excuses, says the London Mayor, Sadiq Khan.
	He tweeted out, there is never a reason to carry a knife, there's no excuses.
	Anyone who does will be caught and they will feel the full force of the law.
	And not to be outdone, his predecessor, Boris Johnson, currently the Foreign Secretary, called for an increased use of stop and search powers by police.
	You've got to stop them.
	You've got to search them.
	You've got to take the knives out of their possession.
	Why is it, by the way, why is it that they're having a surge in knife crimes?
	It's because of the people.
	It's because of the people they brought in.
	And they won't address that because that would be xenophobic!
	It'd be Islamophobic!
	Because we all know the strangers that are doing the knifing are Muslims.
	Poundland, the British equivalent of a dollar store, announced last week that it will no longer sell kitchen knives in any of its 850 stores.
	Similar stores are being slapped with fines for selling knives to minors.
	British politicians propose banning home delivery of knives.
	Police promote street corner bins for the surrender of knives, while also conducting stings against knife sellers.
	Their goal is to, quote, target not only those who carry and use knives, but also the supply, access, and importation of weapons.
	It all sounds so familiar, doesn't it, says Reason, and yet it's so utterly pointless.
	If British authorities have been unable to block criminal access to firearms, and they have, how are they going to be able to cut off the flow of knives, which require nothing more than a piece of hard material that you can put an edge on?
	This is why they create shivs in prison, and they can't stop that.
	So, when we look at this, and we look at the crime in London versus New York, as I point out, A historian, Joyce Lee Malcolm, noted that New York City's homicide rate has been at least five times higher than London's for 200 years.
	For most of that time, there was no serious firearms restrictions in either city.
	But now they're coming.
	And, of course, we have a physician with the Royal College of Psychiatrists of Scotland.
	He wants the sale of all pointed knives stopped.
	Because, you know, he thinks you're too stupid to put a point on a knife.
	No, we get the point.
	And I'm gonna drive the point home when we talk about L.A.
	and then about Venezuela.
	Stay with us, coming up in the next segment.
	Living in volcano may sound more dramatic than it really is.
	The real drama can be found here in Leilani Estates.
	But a lot of us on the Big Island rely on rainwater and we need to be concerned about ash and acid rain.
	Volcanic ash may contain heavy metal particles.
	An acid rain could lower the pH of the water to unhealthy levels.
	To find out, we employed a series of tests for heavy metals, alkalinity, and pH.
	What we learned was that there was in fact unhealthy levels of heavy metals and acidity in the rainwater.
	Next, we tested the water from our Alexa Pure gravity filter.
	And not only were the heavy metal levels within safe measure, but the pH was also restored to optimal levels.
	As it turns out, the filter on the Alexa Pure raises the pH of the water.
	So what we've learned is that volcanic ash and acid rain can contaminate a rainwater supply.
	But more importantly, a good water filtration system will purify it.
	Do you realize that when you spread the links from InfoWars.com, when you spread the videos, you are changing the world?
	It's you!
	That has defeated Hillary and the globalists.
	It is you, the info warriors across the planet, that stood against the bullying, that stood against the peer pressure, that stood against the threats, that have now changed the world.
	And that's why you've been on the team, supporting us, praying for us, and spreading the word.
	You are the info war.
	And now because of their intensifying censorship, it's more important than ever That everyone go to Infowars.com forward slash newsletter and sign up via email so there's no way the censors can get between us with critical videos, articles, breaking news, intel, you name it.
	And so now I ask you more than ever to share the Infowars.com articles, to share the videos, to tell people about the local stations you're listening to.
	The bare minimum you can do is sign up for the free newsletter at Infowars.com forward slash newsletter.
	We are the renaissance and we are winning.
	One of the most incredible cups of coffee can be found in the high mountains of southern Mexico, where the Chiapas farmers have spent years perfecting their techniques.
	Based on hundreds of years of traditional techniques and perfect conditions, we've sourced only the best to provide you with our immune support and Wake Up America Patriot Blend Coffee.
	Ancient Mayan knowledge is paired with the natural fertility of the land to generate the world's finest coffee beans. Carefully harvested and free of toxic chemicals used in big agricultural productions, Patriot Blend coffees have a smooth, bold flavor with great depth to give you just what you need in the morning.
	You can even choose to start your morning healthier with the Immune Support Blend infused with a powerful blend to support your immune response and stamina.
	It's time to take care of your morning routine. Get a bag of Patriot Blend coffee to support the show while enhancing your morning routine at InfoWarsStore.com.
	Stacy in the great state of Texas in FEMA Region 6.
	You're on the air worldwide, Stacey.
	Good to talk to you.
	Before I get into what I want to say, I just want to let you know that I don't normally take vitamins at all.
	I was turned on to the ultimate female force.
	I looked at all the ingredients and they're all organic, root, things like that, that I trust.
	You know, because I've seen a lot of other vitamins that don't have things that they say that they have in them, and they're often not things that are natural.
	I appreciate that.
	Well, what happened with Ultimate Female Force?
	Tell us about it.
	Well, it's really great.
	You know, it's like a multivitamin.
	I take it.
	It tastes good.
	It doesn't have that nasty aftertaste.
	It actually has kind of a pleasant aftertaste.
	And, you know, it just gives me energy and fuels me throughout the day, so I really like it.
	Well, just so you know, we look at whatever the best herbs are.
	They're known to turbocharge women.
	And then we get the organic ones and put it in it.
	So, yeah.
	Stamina, libido, energy.
	These are amazing things and ultimate female force.
	So I'm glad you plugged it.
	Infowarsstore.com or 888-253-3139.
	or 888-253-3139.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	27 years ago during the Rodney King riots, some interesting things happened in LA.
	We can learn a lot from that history.
	And it applies to what's going on in Venezuela right now.
	We're going to get to that in just a moment.
	Before we do, real quickly, I want to tell you about some of the specials we've got at Infowarsstore.com, because that's what funds this program.
	We have a couple of specials where you buy one product at 25% off and get another one complimentary product for free.
	One of those is Survival Shield X2 Nascent Iodine.
	That's 25% off.
	If you buy that you get a bottle of Survival Shield X3 Nascent Iodine for free.
	We also have Brain Force Plus at 25% off.
	If you get a bottle of that, you also get our all-natural sleep aid knockout for free as well.
	Brain Force Plus, of course, are nutraceutical.
	As I've said many times, it's my favorite supplement.
	If I was going to name that after having tried it, I would call it Brain Focus.
	It really does help to focus your mind.
	It helps with your recall. That nutraceutical is 25% off and again you get a free knockout, our all-natural sleep aid in combo with that.
	We also have a couple of other specials I'll tell you about at infowarestore.com.
	We have the Ultimate Bone Broth, 50% off.
	We have still for a limited time only 50% off all apparel.
	That's t-shirts, hats, hoodies, both new and classic designs. All of that 50% off.
	And finally, we have $50 off of a supply of clean air and clean water.
	No, we're not selling Perry Air as they did in Spaceballs.
	Although people are starting to package and can air that is fresh.
	No, you can freshen your air supply in your home very easily with the Alexa Pure Breeze and you can get $50 off it.
	Very silent, very effective.
	And it is something that senses when there's contaminants in.
	It'll change color because it's so silent you didn't know it's working.
	It will change color to let you know the level of contaminant.
	If you don't smell it there, it'll clean that out very effectively.
	And also Alexa Pure Pro.
	That is our water filter, our gravity feed water filter.
	$50 off of that as well.
	Take a look at the products we have at InfowarsStore.com.
	We really do need and appreciate your support.
	You are our sponsor.
	And if you don't sponsor us, we won't be here.
	Alright, let's talk about the L.A.
	riots of 27 years ago.
	They began on April the 29th, 1992, and they ran through May the 4th.
	Went for many days.
	And of course, if you remember, what predicated that was the acquittal of four L.A.
	police officers who were acquitted of using excessive force in the beating of Rodney King.
	Regardless of what you think about that particular incident, the acquittal set off riots throughout LA that lasted for several days.
	It left over a million dollars in property damage.
	We have, as you're seeing there, Reginald Denny, a truck driver who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and have the wrong color skin, was drug out of his truck And that was stopped at a traffic light and beaten nearly to death by a mob of rioters, simply because he was white.
	His skull was fractured in 91 places, but he survived.
	Some other people did not.
	53 people were killed, 35 of them from gunfire.
	And as Gateway Pundit points out, there is an individual On Twitter, that has been, it's created a thread talking about the Roof Koreans.
	And it highlights really the importance of the Second Amendment.
	And we can see the importance of the Second Amendment right now in Venezuela.
	What's going on there?
	I'm going to get to that in just a moment.
	But first, what happened in our own country when society broke down?
	When law enforcement hid and shirked their duty?
	And I want you to remember That it was Darrell Gates in L.A.
	who created what we now know as SWAT teams.
	He did it in response, interestingly enough, to the 1965 riots in L.A., the Watts Riots.
	So he said, well, because of the Watts Riots, we've got to have a paramilitary police force.
	We're going to have SWAT teams, we're going to have armored personnel carrier and tanks and all this other kind of stuff, right?
	Then fast forward 28 years to 1992.
	And what happened?
	Daryl Gates and the police used their armored vehicles to protect City Hall, to protect police stations, to protect themselves, and everybody else, like Reginald Denny, were on their own.
	Or these Korean shop owners.
	So, 28 years from the Watts riots to the L.A.
	Rodney King riots, and those happened 27 years ago.
	You don't think it can happen again?
	So, what happened with this?
	Well, we're reminded by a Twitter user, AtAsianJ86, he says, Koreans were savagely attacked while their businesses and homes were looted and burned.
	They did what good citizens do, they called the police and they waited for help.
	Unfortunately, the police were stretched thin and they were also being targeted for violence and they also quit responding, frankly.
	He said, so what do good American citizens do when the police can't or won't help them and hordes of armed looters are descending upon them?
	They become peak American citizens by exercising their God-given and constitutionally protected rights.
	Unfortunately for the rioters, most of these fine Americans were legal immigrants from Korea.
	As such, many of them had fulfilled Korea's mandatory service obligations prior to earning American citizenship, and they took to the Second Amendment like beef to bulgogi.
	I don't know, that's maybe some Korean food.
	Outraged at the attack against their prosperous law-abiding community and abandoned by law enforcement, But the police protects you, he puts in parentheses.
	They gathered their arms and their ammunition.
	Many were carried to the rooftops by bald eagles, or so the legend goes.
	And the Roof Koreans were born.
	On the second day of the riots, April 30th, 1992, David, a humble gun shop owner, and his friend Richard Park, a purveyor of fine jewelry who owned a store in the same plaza, came under attack.
	Not being bloodthirsty savages, they called the police.
	Four of LA's finest showed between the waves of attacks.
	They encouraged the Koreans to flee for their lives.
	And he said, I kid you not.
	Of course, that's not the term they used.
	But I kid you not, the law enforcement officers promptly fled as soon as the rioters attacked again.
	and started taking pot shots. And then he puts in uppercase, your safety is your responsibility. Do not rely on police.
	Yeah, they could run for their lives, but what's a life worth if you abandon everything that you spent your life toiling for?
	The existence you've sweated and labored for in the face of danger. He's absolutely right.
	They stood, they fought. And again, about half of the damage was sustained by Korean American business owners, the financial damage. And the Korean American areas were left largely without the police because they were not using their magic SWAT team powers to protect anybody except themselves.
	So, as one individual said, yeah, they told me I could go away, but he says, am I going to let them burn down 33 years of my life, of my life's work?
	No, I'm not going to.
	He says it's just like war.
	I'll shoot and worry about the law later.
	And so they fought off hundreds of looters.
	As John Locke stated, reports of Free Thought Project, they summarized this, they said, self-defense is the first law of nature.
	Each person owns his or her own life and no other person has a right to take that life.
	Those who would attempt to stop you from defending yourself are attacking the very right from which all other rights are derived.
	That is the protection of your own life.
	Which brings us to Venezuela.
	Yes, socialism is revolting.
	Why aren't the Venezuelans?
	Well, they're trying, but they can't do much about it when the government has all of the firearms.
	These people are true Marxists.
	They went through a period of gun confiscation before all of socialism kicked in.
	And so, as Mao said, power comes out of the barrel of a gun and they've got all the guns.
	MSNBC Showed why the U.S.
	founders wanted armed citizenry, says Breitbart.
	And actually, you've got, as video comes out of a Tiananmen Square type of incident where you've got a armored personnel vehicle plowing into protesters, as soon as that video right there that you see, when that got out, they shut down.
	The press outlets, they shut down the BBC, they shut down CNN.
	They don't want that kind of information going out.
	They can easily shut down the First Amendment if you don't have the Second Amendment to protect yourself.
	But MSNBC put it right on the spot.
	You had a reporter, Kerry Sanders, said that Maduro has the advantage of guns against an unarmed populist.
	They started with Andrea Mitchell, Alan Greenspan's wife, expressing surprise that Maduro was still holding on, and then Kerry Sanders says, well, not only hanging on, but he appears to still control the military.
	You have to understand, in Venezuela, gun ownership is not something that is open to everybody.
	So, if the military have the guns, they have the power.
	Uh-huh, yeah, she understands Marx.
	So, as long as Nicolas Maduro controls the military, he controls the country.
	Which is why?
	When you hear people like General McChrystal talking about how, well, you can't allow Americans to have military weapons, go back and take a look at what's going on in Venezuela.
	These traitors like McChrystal want to bring that here to America.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Getting your protein has never been easier with InfoWars Life Protein Bars.
	Available in delicious chocolate peanut butter and vanilla coconut flavors, these protein bars are the perfect answer for a snack on the go.
	InfoWars Life Protein Bars are nutrient-packed, portable protein bars for an easy-to-eat and great-tasting meal.
	Pre- or post-workout, fuel alternative.
	At just 240 calories per bar and 15 grams of protein each, these bars will be your favorite at-hand snack for at home, in the car, at work, or on the go.
	For getting nutrients easily, high in fiber and nutrients with wholesome ingredients for high-level performance with great taste, such as whey protein and chocolate compounds.
	These protein bars can help you with the boost you need to reach your goals.
	Protein-packed and full of fiber and healthy ingredients, InfoWars Life Protein Bars are a can't-miss snack for any InfoWarrior serious about their energy.
	Try both flavors today at InfoWarsStore.com.
	Our grandparents, great-grandparents, knew that they canned food.
	During the falls, they'd have it during the winter.
	And that's what I'm talking about at InfoWarsTour.com.
	With InfoWars Select, it's the full spectrum of my patronage supply.
	Most respected companies out there.
	But because I private label it, I'm able to go below cost on contracts that all their other distributors aren't able to do.
	But I want to be a market leader, and I want you to have storable food, so it's a total win-win.
	We have those incredible sell prices back.
	MFORWARDSTORE.COM on MFORWARDS SELECT STORABLE FOODS.
	They've got special diet foods.
	They've got three-month supplies, year's supplies, week emergency supplies.
	They've got so many great products there.
	Maybe you've got a three-year supply.
	If stuff happens, you can feed your whole block.
	It's up to us to be self-sufficient.
	You're buying War Bonds, bringing you great products, and together, with God's help, we are unstoppable.
	InfoWareStore.com and InfoWare Select, high-quality, storable foods powered by my Patriot Supply.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Making Sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	I'm going to finish up with Venezuela here because we've got the bar brawl about to start.
	Attorney General Barr is going to be answering questions in the Senate.
	We're going to join that when it starts live.
	But to finish up with Venezuela.
	As we look at this, and as we have the MSNBC back and forth between Andrew Mitchell and Kerry Sanders, and Kerry Sanders says, well, you know, uh, no, uh, you still have Maduro in control because he controls the military.
	So this is why people like General McChrystal that the Democrats trot out and people of his ilk to push gun control, to tell us, oh, well, you know, those bullets that are fired from those particular guns, look at the muzzle velocity of those bullets.
	You can't have guns like that in the hands of ordinary citizens.
	Because he and the military-industrial complex want to have the balance of power in our country, just as the socialist Marxists in Venezuela are lording it over the citizens there, regardless of what they want, because they have all the guns.
	James Madison, the founding father who was really the father of the Bill of Rights, pointed out about guns, he said, one of America's strengths is the fact that the people at large are armed.
	In Federalist No.
	46, he said, the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation.
	Yeah, that's our advantage.
	That's what makes us different from Venezuela.
	And don't you ever forget it.
	When we look at what's going on there, we've got again, the question is, as they're waiting for a White O, can he get the military to go over to his side?
	Because they have all of the power, because they have all of the guns.
	There's no widespread sign of military support yet.
	I mean, do they have a legitimate grief?
	Yes, they do!
	I've talked many times about the horrors of socialism that have already been implemented in Venezuela.
	The same programs that all the Democrats, every single one of them, wants to implement here in America.
	And so, yeah, that is a legitimate reason to not go along that way.
	And if you look at the history of what has happened in that country, it goes back, as many people, the question going back and forth is, are we going to have regime change that's going to be pushed by people like Mike Pompeo?
	I mean, they have a very legitimate case there to push back against what is happening in Venezuela.
	Even Fox News is using the term coup, however.
	And as Breitbart points out, it's not necessarily a coup.
	I mean, this guy was not elected, but here's the narrative as Breitbart lays it out.
	And I think they're right about this.
	I think the people who are protesting, I think they're morally right to throw out these communists.
	They don't have the gun power to do it, but I think they have the legal and moral legitimacy on their side.
	I still do not think that we ought to be involved in regime change, however.
	But here's the case as this is laid out by Breitbart.
	They said nobody, including Fox News, bothers to mention that Hugo Chavez himself staged a failed coup in 1992.
	And that failed coup is still celebrated by the Maduro regime.
	And then you had the Venezuelan Constitution that was put in by Chavez in 1999.
	In that Constitution, Article 233, Lists among the reasons that the National Assembly can remove a president, quote, the abandonment of the office as declared by the National Assembly and the popular revocation of his or her mandate.
	Article 350 requires the Venezuelan people not to accept the legitimacy of any regime, legislation, or authority that defies the values, principles, and democratic guarantees in the Constitution or violates human rights.
	Do you think that that would qualify when people are starving in the streets?
	Yeah, I would think so.
	In January, the National Assembly declared Nicolas Maduro unfit to serve as president due to the popular revocation of his mandate.
	Maduro held an election of May and May of last year which allowed only other Marxist candidates to run against him.
	He bribed voters with food, he threatened them with violence through socialist gangs known as Collectivos.
	The free world, as a result, rejected those elections.
	The National Assembly declared it a fraud.
	And as the leader of the last democratically elected organization, Wido declared himself president.
	So it's a very interesting moral and legal situation.
	And it's an instruction to us as to why we will not give up our gun.
	I've been doing a lot of research into Google and YouTube censorship.
	And I've noticed that there's one type of video that is the most censored, the most buried, the most suppressed.
	And that's the videos where you saw in 2016 election night all the arrogant leftist authoritarians like the Young Turks and others get so butthurt when Trump won.
	They don't want us to have that victory.
	They don't want us to remember what political action did.
	And that's why the globalists, Hillary and others, are trying to shut InfoWars down.
	This is a fight about taking your speech away, not just my speech.
	About taking your very sovereignty away.
	This country is in a war!
	So again, I want to thank you for what you've done, but I want to remind you, if you don't spread the articles and videos, and if you don't financially get the great products we have and fund us, and the 360 win, we're dead in the water.
	I'm in your hands, you're in my hands, InfoWarsTore.com, thank you!
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	And now, the David Knight Show!
	Welcome back.
	We're about to join the Bar Brawl live as Attorney General Barr is going to be answering questions from the Senate.
	And as we look at this, I want to focus on how this is political theater, especially by the Democrats.
	As Politico points out, only two lawmakers have seen the less redacted Mueller report.
	Well, how did that happen?
	How did two people get picked for this?
	Well, it turns out most of them don't really care to look at it.
	Only two lawmakers have seen this report that is less redacted.
	Attorney General Barr selected 12 members of Congress, 6 Democrats, 6 Republicans, and said, I'll show you the less redacted report.
	It's not fully unredacted, but it's a lot less redacted.
	But as of yesterday, only Doug Collins, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, and Senator Lindsey Graham Had bothered to look at it.
	This is kind of like the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
	Oh, you can't tell anybody what's in it.
	You can go view it in a room, but you can't take any notes, you can't take any pictures, you can't write anything down.
	And still, nobody bothered to go look at it, except for Jeff Sessions.
	One of the reasons why I was optimistic about Jeff Sessions at the beginning.
	But nevertheless, when you look at this, think about this.
	You've got 12 members of Congress, some from the House, some from the Senate, and only 2 of the 12 that could look at this bothered to look at it.
	So that's only 17% of Congress that bothered to look at this, of the people that were offered to look at it.
	But it's even worse when you look at it by party.
	0% of the Democrats, 0% of the Democrats bothered to look at this.
	Less redacted report.
	And 33% of the GOP.
	Now, Congressman Doug Collins, again, he's the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, he says, it didn't change anything.
	Some of the redactions could actually be implied from other parts of the report that were not redacted.
	And this is what we've seen for the last couple of years.
	This is why I haven't covered this more on my program.
	Because everything that has been put out, we have already inferred.
	From testimony of people, from leaks and so forth.
	There really wasn't anything new that came out of the Mueller Report.
	It was just that it was officially there.
	There was no collusion.
	And even though we've had a letter come out by St.
	Mueller, I think we should call it the Epistle of St.
	Mueller because it is a religious document to the Democrats.
	It's leaked to the Washington Post and the New York Times at the same time.
	It doesn't really say anything.
	It doesn't say that there really was collusion and AG Barr is misleading everybody on that.
	It doesn't say that there was obstruction.
	It just says, well, you know, I'm not really happy about this process.
	It's a really, there's nothing there.
	And I think the Democrats know that.
	That's why they didn't bother to look at a less redacted report.
	Lindsey Graham looked at it.
	He said, it didn't change anything for me.
	I don't know why they redacted half of what they redacted.
	It reminds me of when the The letter that was being protected, you know, that you had the House Republicans want a document.
	Remember when they had the document that they wanted declassified?
	President Trump said, I'm going to declassify it.
	And the Department of Justice and the FBI went apoplectic.
	And President Trump said, there's nothing in there that harms national security.
	It doesn't expose any methods.
	It doesn't name names of anybody.
	And he redacted and he declassified that.
	And it didn't.
	And it didn't tell us anything that we didn't already know.
	As a matter of fact, when we look at the Mueller Report, it tells us a lot of stuff that we know is not true.
	About Russian hacking of the DNC and so forth.
	That is a total lie!
	And we've exposed that over and over again, along with William Binney and many others.
	WikiLeaks has told us it was a lie.
	William Binney has proven it was a lie, technically.
	And yet, the Mueller Report still has that in there.
	So yeah, there's nothing new.
	There are some lies that are in there, but they're going to have a hearing where you're going to have a lot of grandstanding by Democrats, remember, who didn't bother to read the less redacted report.
	It's all big to do about nothing.
	Mueller wrote his letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William Barr that a four-page memo to Congress did not, quote, fully capture the context, nature, and substance of his work.
	You'd need a piece of toilet paper to fully capture the substance of his work.
	At the time Mueller's letter was sent to Barr, March 27, Barr had days prior announced that Mueller did not find a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.
	Justice Department officials said Tuesday, reports MSN.com, this is the left media telling you this, that they were taken aback by the tone of Mueller's letter and that it came as a surprise to them that he had such concerns.
	Until they received the letter, they believed that Mueller was in agreement with them on the process of reviewing the report and redacting certain types of information, a process that took several weeks.
	Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel's findings.
	And remember, when he held a press conference and he released it, standing there right behind him was one of Mueller's compatriots, Rod Rosenstein, a deep state establishment Democrat.
	Who is also, I believe, involved in collusion.
	He was right there saying, yeah, yeah, we're putting this stuff out.
	Now he's now resigned as of last week.
	He's gone.
	In his letter to Barr, Mueller wrote that the redaction process, quote, need not delay release of the enclosed materials.
	Release at this time would alleviate the misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional and public questions about the nature and outcome of our investigation.
	So in the letter to Barr, Mueller sounds like he wants this stuff released, right?
	But even when it's released, and you know, first Barr gave everybody a four-page summary.
	Then he released it with redactions.
	Then he's now released a less redacted copy of the report.
	Democrats don't care.
	Their minds have already made up.
	They were made up three years ago.
	The whole thing was a dodge.
	As Zero Hedge points out, if one reads, only the headlines are being put out By the Washington Post and the New York Times, it doesn't look good for Attorney General Barr, especially just one day before his first official congressional hearing on the topic of the Mueller Report.
	But, if you actually read what was now, again, still doing the same stuff, still leaking out the same stuff, Mueller still leaking this out to who?
	To the Washington Post and the New York Times simultaneously.
	So the Washington Post and the New York Times report is not so bad if one actually reads it.
	Because they said there's this following punchline from the Washington Post.
	When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr's memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said that he did not.
	Mueller said he felt there was some confusion.
	He felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, said officials.
	So, still no collusion.
	And there is no obstruction.
	And it's kind of interesting As we pointed out last week, President Trump pointed out last week.
	He said, you know, everybody has pretty much, this is broken down along partisan lines.
	There really isn't any obstruction if there's no crime.
	That's what Dershowitz pointed out.
	And there wasn't any crime.
	And there wasn't any obstruction to fire Comey.
	And that is what they're trying to hang the obstruction case on.
	Comey is in a department that is completely under the executive branch.
	And the Democrats were all on board with Comey being fired.
	Remember when Stephen Colbert announced it, his audience applauded.
	No, no, no, wait a minute.
	That's not a good thing because President Trump did it.
	He had to tell them, no, no, no, you got to oppose this because Trump did it.
	They were happy to see Comey fired.
	Everybody on both sides were upset with Comey.
	I was upset when he said felonies were created by Hillary Clinton, but I'm not going to do anything about it.
	That would not be in our interest to do anything about that.
	Yeah, we understand.
	But we have Judge Napolitano come out and attack President Trump.
	President Trump said, well, he came to me, he wanted a position on the Supreme Court.
	I said, no, that's why he's doing this.
	Judge Napolitano, who has usually been right on target with everything, is completely off the rails with this criticism, frankly.
	I just don't.
	That's the only explanation that makes any sense, is that he's now got a personal grudge against President Trump.
	Look, I have my criticisms of President Trump.
	You heard what I said about the Second Amendment, the dangerous precedent that he set.
	But this is criminal, what is being done here.
	And we should not allow this to happen.
	Regardless of what you think about a person or their policies, this is corruption personified.
	And we're going to be going to the live hearing with Attorney General Barr in just a moment.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	Brain Force Plus is a top-tier nootropin.
	Focus.
	Clarity.
	Energy.
	But instead of having a 7x markup, we have a 150% markup.
	Right now, it's massively discounted.
	And when you get a bottle of it at 25% off, you get a free bottle of what is our total bestseller.
	It's not very profitable because we give it at such a low price, but it's amazing.
	And that, of course, is knockout, the ultimate sleep aid.
	So we've got a way to energize you, ramp you up in a healthy way during the day.
	And put you deep into that restful, healthy sleep at night.
	It's the Brain Force and Knockout Combo Deal.
	25% off Brain Force and a free bottle of Knockout together right now.
	Get the combo and experience both these great products today.
	Take advantage of it and fund the InfoWars.
	InfoWarsLife.com.
	InfoWarsStore.com.
	The Brain Force Plus Knockout Combo right now.
	Get your free bottle today at InfoWarsStore.com.
	Fueling your body is hard work.
	That's why we've introduced the InfoWars Life Daily Digestive Pack to help you fuel it right.
	Combine FloraLife Everyday Maintenance and Carnivore to help you fuel your gut and body and take advantage of the powerful nutrients you receive.
	There's no better way to power your body.
	Floralife is a powerful probiotic supplement with 20 of the most potent clinically studied probiotic strains.
	When paired with Carnivore, our incredible enzyme formula that helps you break down nutrients, these formulas fuel your gut and your body to help you fight toxins and stay fueled all day.
	These incredible formulas can help keep your body in tip-top shape in the fight against stress, age, and outside toxins.
	There's no better time to try Floralife and Carnivore to see how well they can support your body.
	Don't miss out on the chance to fuel your body and support recovery.
	Try the InfoWars Life Daily Digestive Pack today.
	Thanks for watching.
	But they are riddled with dyes and toxins and synthetic caffeines and other chemicals that sure get you a quick boost, but burn out in just a few hours and have terrible side effects.
	We have developed, hands down from our research, the most powerful, healthy energy drink pre-workout and beyond system in the world.
	There's nothing else like it.
	You must experience it.
	It is a total game-changer when it comes to easy-to-use packets to mix in with fruit juice or water, whatever you'd like.
	Warning, though, it's very, very strong.
	It lasts 10 hours.
	So take a half packet the first time you take it because TurboForce is named TurboForce because it will take you into overdrive.
	TurboForce at m4slive.com.
	Stress is a natural part of life.
	Work, family, friends, and everyday accidents can put a lot of strain on the body and your mood.
	Don't let life weigh you down.
	Happies is a powerful mood and stress support formula that has your back against life's daily inconveniences.
	Made with ancient ingredients used for thousands of years, Happies can help you take back the day.
	With our powerhouse formula, Happies can be an important part of your daily supplement routine.
	With poor diet and the constant on and off of your work life, it's more important than ever to support your body in the fight against stress.
	With powerful ingredients combined to help support the mind and body, Happies helps support during stress, promotes overall well-being, and helps support your mood.
	Don't let your life bogged down.
	Help your body overcome the effects of daily stress and pressure today with Happies from Infowarsstore.com.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	We're going to join the Senate hearing where they question Attorney General Barr.
	Just a few moments.
	I'll remind you again that Attorney General Barr first put out a four-page summary.
	He said, well, that's not good enough.
	We need to see the whole report.
	So then he put out the whole report.
	A lot of redactions.
	They still were not happy about that.
	But you could still see what was there.
	So then he put out a less redacted report, made it available to six Democrats, six Republicans, two of the Republicans, one-third of them took a look at it.
	And none of the Democrats, but they're going to question him severely today on something they couldn't be bothered to even take a look at.
	This is the politics of the situation.
	Now the only senator who took a look at it was, because the other Republican was a member of the House Judiciary Committee, the ranking Republican on that committee, Senator Lindsey Graham took a look at it.
	And Lindsey Graham has been doing all the talking so far at the hearing, introducing to everyone Bob Mueller.
	You do not need to hear Bob Mueller being introduced by Lindsey Graham.
	I think you know everything about him.
	So we're going to join when they actually start with the questions to Attorney General Barr.
	But just to put a background on this, let's understand that even as they made a less redacted copy available to six Democrats, six Republicans, again, most of them don't care to see it.
	Roger Stone would like to see it.
	You know, when Attorney General Barr held the press conference before he released the full report, the only person he mentioned by name was Roger Stone.
	He said, we've got the redactions in there to protect some ongoing cases that have yet to be heard, and he mentioned Roger Stone specifically.
	Well, Roger Stone believes that there is exculpatory evidence in that report.
	In other words, evidence that would show that he's not guilty.
	But of course we've seen the Department of Justice do this time and again.
	We've seen them do it with Schaefer Cox, as I reported last week.
	We've seen them do it with Ross Ulbrich, the Silk Road case.
	Hiding evidence so they could send people to prison.
	They did it with the Bundys!
	They had all kinds of exculpatory evidence.
	All kinds of that evidence was hidden by the Department of Justice and by that judge until a whistleblower, a BLM whistleblower, to his credit, Blue the lid on the crimes of the FBI and the Department of Justice to such an extent that the judge, who had previously been complicit in that corruption, said, all right, that's it, I'm not going to jail for these people.
	And she declared a mistrial with prejudice, which meant that it was not available for a retry.
	And yet this criminal Department of Justice is still trying to do that.
	Now, contrast that.
	They still are coming, even after the judge shut it down, dismissed it with prejudice, Which should finally end it.
	That's as much of a not guilty plea as you can ever have.
	You still got the corrupt Department of Justice trying to come back after the Bundys.
	And you still got people in prison who were convicted when exculpatory evidence was hidden in their trials and lies were put out by the FBI, the BLM and the Department of Justice.
	And yet look on the other side as Zero Hedge says, why are Clapper and Brennan not in jail?
	And they point out There's the clearest of all the laws concerning U.S.
	intelligence.
	They quote it.
	Section 798, 18 U.S.
	Code.
	Widely known in the intelligence community as the COMINT statute.
	Or the 10 and 10.
	And basically it says, whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person any classified information.
	It's got a whole bunch of different things there.
	That should be enough to put Hillary in jail as well, besides the ordinary violations of national security.
	But anything concerning the communication intelligence activities of the U.S.
	or any foreign government, or anything that was obtained by the process of communication intelligence, shall be under the title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
	And they point out, just as we've now had this new Mueller letter, which is a nothing, really is a nothing, just as that was released to the Washington Post and the New York Times going back to December 9th and 10th, 2016, it was the same New York Times and Washington Post that got all these scoops from intelligence officials.
	And they agreed.
	That Russia had hacked the Democrat National Committee to help Donald Trump win the election.
	Remember?
	It was Hillary Clinton's.
	All 17 agencies.
	And then he had James Clapper's.
	All 17 agencies after that.
	And then, eventually, he got a little bit closer to the truth.
	He said, well, it wasn't all 17.
	I had a meeting as Director of National Intelligence.
	I had a meeting with the FBI, the CIA, the NSA.
	One person from each of those agencies.
	I told them, and they agreed with me.
	Because I'm the DNI.
	And that was what, this whole thing has been a dodge from the very beginning.
	But when you look at what they're doing, whether it's to Carter Page, whether it's to President Trump, it is a clear violation of this.
	As they point out in this article, it's incontrovertibly the officials who gave these stories to the Times, the New York Times and the Washington Post, violated this statute And they're subject to the 10 and 10 for each of these counts.
	And there's no clearer indictment, they said, of our legal system than the fact that no one has been prosecuted for these violations, much less punished.
	I just want to remind you that this isn't the first time that James Clapper has violated the FISA Act or the Constitution.
	And we saw that when he lied under oath, committed perjury Telling Senator Wyden that he wasn't.
	The NSA and all these people were not listening to anything that anybody had to say.
	And he was never charged, never punished for committing perjury to cover up his violation of FISA and the Constitution.
	And because he was let go, they said, well, we can do that, and we can do it even to the President and his staff.
	And that's exactly what they did.
	And so, as I point out, Brennan and Clapper continue as living proof that the U.S.
	has a dual system of justice, and so does Hillary Clinton, as we look at this.
	There may be real bombshells coming, as Inspector General Horowitz is just a few weeks away from releasing his investigation of violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
	And again, I don't know, does it, do we come back and say, well we really mean it, we do it against the President, Elect and the President after he's become President.
	We really mean it on those cases.
	Because we didn't mean it when you violated it for Mr. and Mrs. America.
	We did it to all the rest of us, we just looked the other way and we didn't really care.
	We may care, or we may not, when they do it to the President.
	And as I said, they already did it, and they lied under oath to cover up their crime.
	But they don't get charged, even for the obvious perjury.
	I mean, the perjury that Clapper committed, there's absolutely no question about that.
	Because it was just a couple of weeks after that that Ed Snowden leaked all that information and exposed Clapper as a perjurer.
	And yet nothing happened to him.
	Remember, we impeached Bill Clinton for perjury.
	Not for a consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky, but for perjury about that consensual affair.
	And yet here we have a guy who has been rewarded with the highest intelligence positions, James Clapper, who not only committed perjury, but he committed perjury to cover up something that is a big crime.
	Again.
	It's not perjury to cover up a consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky.
	It's perjury to cover up the fact that he violated the Constitution, violated the FISA laws, which were put in place because as soon as these agencies were created in the 1960s, they were already violating the Constitution and the prohibitions against spying on American citizens.
	That's why they created FISA in the first place.
	These institutions, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA, they haven't just recently gone bad, folks.
	They've always been bad.
	Maybe you just recently started paying attention.
	Some of us have been paying attention for a long time.
	We'll be right back with the Barr hearing.
	Stay with us.
	Infowarsstore.com is how you support us, and it's not like we're selling stuff you don't need, you don't want.
	The air in the average American home is filled with toxins that put it on par with a major city.
	Some of the most polluted areas on earth are major cities.
	How can I solve that problem?
	So we have air filters at Infowarsstore.com, the Alexa Pure Breeze, which is right now $50 off.
	The Alexa Pure Breeze Groundbreaking Ion Cluster Air Filter Technology.
	And we've got a limited quantity of these left right now.
	We're basically selling these at cost because there was a big overhaul.
	Go ahead and read the hundreds of five-star reviews for yourself.
	I've got two in my home.
	You will notice the difference, ladies and gentlemen, with the Alexa Pure Breeze in your house.
	Don't live In a polluted major city, in your home, have clean air.
	Go to Infowarsstore.com.
	I want to salute and commend every man, woman, and child that has supported this broadcast over the years and that has stood with us.
	And I want to thank all of our sponsors and all of our affiliates.
	But I'll tell you like it is.
	You've seen the unmitigated attack we've been under.
	You're our only sponsors.
	And when you don't buy the products that are absolutely the best out there, we aren't able to continue on.
	So remember, you are the info war.
	I'm not the leader, you are the leader.
	When you take action, nothing stops you.
	We've got giant specials running right now at InfoWarsStore.com that are unprecedented.
	And if you go there and buy great products that you already need from across the board, it funds the second American Revolution worldwide.
	So I want to thank you for your support, and I want to encourage you again.
	Go to InfoWarsStore.com for whatever the product is you need.
	We have thousands of them, and it makes this all possible.
	Thank you for making InfoWars possible.
	God bless you.
	You know, the worst part about getting old and I'm still strong at 45 is that I won't be there for my children someday.
	That's why I need to make them strong now.
	Now, I can be there for my children.
	Now, I can make them strong.
	Now, I can instruct them.
	Now, I can teach them what I've learned.
	But not once I'm gone.
	You think in this digital age, your word's gone forever, but now they're even better at getting rid of what you said they were before.
	It's so much easier to burn video or text or languages now that we have high-tech book burning, isn't it?
	But I have joined my will to the resistance.
	I can't be destroyed now, as long as I realize I've done right and as long as the people know the truth.
	And you can't be destroyed either, as long as you bind yourself to something and commit to it and go through the fire for it.
	There is a magic that then takes place that transcends space and time.
	When you commit via word of mouth, or to pray for us, or to spread our articles and videos, that overrides everything the enemy's doing.
	So please now, commit to support InfoWars however you can, and realize your provision to InfoWars is your own provision.
	It's time to show them what a real alpha male looks like with one of our most powerful products ever made, Alpha Power.
	As you age, your body can lose testosterone over time.
	With the incredible ingredients in this formula, we can help you beat the test of time and assist in restoring that lost energy and mood that comes with time and age.
	Alpha Power's incredible ingredients can help you boost your sports performance or enhance your day-to-day life with ease while encouraging hormonal balance.
	Perfect by itself or with super male vitality in the True Alpha Male Pack.
	Alpha Power can help boost performance, help maintain normal testosterone levels, support healthy cholesterol and more.
	Let Alpha Power help bring you to the peak of your optimal health.
	Don't fall short on energy in the fight against tyranny.
	Show the world what a True Alpha Male looks like today with Alpha Power.
	Head to Infowarsstore.com today!
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Subscribe to David Knight for more!
	Using free speech to free minds.
	It's The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	We're going to join the Barr hearing.
	We had Lindsey Graham talking for an extended amount of time.
	We had Dianne Feinstein then following up.
	I spared you that.
	So now we're going to have the statement from Attorney General Barr.
	And of course, Dianne Feinstein.
	Let's remember, AG Barr released a less redacted Mueller report to six Democrats and six Republicans.
	Lindsey Graham did read it.
	Dianne Feinstein couldn't be bothered.
	Here is AG Barr's statement.
	During my confirmation process, there were two concerns that dominated as I think you will all The first was whether I would in any way impede or curtail Special Counsel Mueller's investigation.
	And the second, whether I would make public his final report.
	As you see, Bob Mueller was allowed to complete his work as he saw fit.
	And as for the report, even though the applicable regulations require that the report is to be made to the AG and is to remain confidential and not be made public, I told this committee that I intended to exercise whatever discretion I had to make as much of the report available to the public and to congressional leaders as I could, consistent with the law.
	This has been done.
	I arrived at the department on February 14th.
	And shortly thereafter, I asked it to be communicated to Bob Mueller's team that in preparing the report, We requested that they make it so we could readily identify 6E material so we could quickly process the report.
	Did you tell the public what 6E is?
	6E is grand jury material that cannot be made public.
	It's prohibited by statute.
	That was 6E material, not 6E.
	And I wanted that identified so we could redact that material and prepare the report for public release as quickly as we could.
	When I arrived at the department, I found, and was eventually briefed in on the investigation, I found that the Deputy Attorney General and his Principal Associate Deputy, Ed O'Callaghan, were in regular discussions with the Counsel's Office, had been, and they communicated this request and had discussions about both the timing of the report and the nature of the report.
	On March 5th, I met with Bob at the suggestion of the Deputy and the Principal Associate Deputy Bob Mueller.
	I met with Bob Mueller to get a readout on what his conclusions would be.
	On March 25th, And at that meeting, I asked, I reiterated to Special Counsel Mueller, that in order to have the shortest possible time before I was in a position to release the report, I asked that they identify 6E material.
	When I received the report on March 22nd, And we were hoping to have that easily identified, the 6E material.
	Unfortunately, it did not come in that form.
	And it quickly became apparent that it would take about three or four weeks to identify that material and other material that have to be redacted.
	So there was necessarily going to be a gap between the receipt of the report and getting the full report out publicly.
	The deputy and I identified four categories of information that we believe required redaction.
	And I think you all know of them, but they were the grand jury material, the 6E material, information that the intelligence community advised would reveal sensitive sources and methods, information that if revealed at this stage would impinge on the investigation or prosecution of related cases, And information that would unfairly affect the privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties.
	We went about redacting this material in concert with the special counsel's office.
	We needed their assistance to identify this 6E material in particular.
	The redactions were all carried out by DOJ lawyers with special counsel lawyers in consultation with intelligence community.
	The report contained a substantial amount of material over which the president could have asserted executive privilege.
	But the president made the decision not to assert executive privilege and to make public as much of the report as we could, subject to the redactions that we thought required.
	Now, as you see, the report has been lightly redacted.
	The public version has been estimated to have Only 10% redactions.
	The vast bulk of those redactions are in Volume 1, which is the volume that deals with collusion, and it relates to existing, ongoing cases.
	Volume 2 has only about 2% redactions for the public version, so 98% of Volume 2, dealing with obstruction, is available to the public.
	We have made a version of the report available to congressional leaders that only contains redactions of grand jury material.
	For this version, overall redactions are less than two percent for the whole report, and for volume two, dealing with obstruction, they are less than one-tenth of one percent.
	So given the limited nature of redactions, I believe that the publicly released report will allow every American to understand the results of the special counsel's work.
	By now, everyone is familiar with the special counsel's bottom line conclusions about Russian attempts to interfere in the election.
	In Volume 1, the Special Counsel found that the Russians engaged in two distinct schemes.
	First, the Internet Research Agency, a Russian entity with close ties to the Russian government, conducted a disinformation and social media operation to sow discord among Americans.
	Second, the GRU, Russian Military Intelligence, hacked into computers and stole emails from individuals affiliated with the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton's campaign.
	The special counsel investigated whether anyone affiliated with President Trump's campaign conspired or coordinated with these criminal schemes.
	They concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to establish that there had been any conspiracy or coordination with the Russian government or the IRA.
	And Mueller concluded that without ever interviewing people like William Binney or anybody from Rookie Leaks who said that wasn't the case.
	He still couldn't make a case for it.
	and the special counsel considered whether certain actions of the president could amount to obstruction.
	He decided not to reach a conclusion.
	Instead, the report recounts 10 episodes and discusses potential legal theories for connecting the president's actions to elements of obstruction offenses.
	Thank you.
	Now, we first heard that the special counsel's decision not to decide the obstruction issue at the March 5th meeting, when he came over to the department, and we were frankly surprised that they were not going to reach a decision on obstruction.
	And we asked them a lot about the reasoning behind this and the basis for this.
	Special Counsel Mueller stated three times to us in that meeting, in response to our questioning, that he emphatically was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found obstruction.
	He said that in the future, the facts of a case against a president might be such that a special counsel would recommend abandoning the OLC opinion, but this is not such a case.
	We did not understand exactly why the special counsel was not reaching a decision.
	And when we pressed him on it, he said that his team was still formulating the explanation.
	Once we heard that the special counsel was not reaching a conclusion on obstruction, the deputy and I discussed and agreed that the department had to reach a decision.
	We had the responsibility to assess the evidence as set forth in the report and to make the judgment.
	I say this because the special counsel was appointed to carry out the investigative and prosecutorial functions of the department and to do it as part of the Department of Justice.
	All right, we've got to take a quick break.
	We're going to hold it right there and pick it right back up.
	Again, what he is doing is recapping what he said at the press conference.
	We'll have more of that when we come back.
	Stay with us.
	I'm David Knight.
	I want to salute and commend every man, woman, and child that has supported this broadcast over the years and that has stood with us.
	And I want to thank all of our sponsors and all of our affiliates.
	But I'll tell you like it is.
	You've seen the unmitigated attack we've been under.
	You're our only sponsors.
	And when you don't buy the products that are absolutely the best out there, we aren't able to continue on.
	So remember, you are the Infowar.
	I'm not the leader, you are the leader.
	When you take action, nothing stops you.
	We've got giant specials running right now at InfowarStore.com that are unprecedented.
	And if you go there and buy great products that you already need from across the board, it funds the second American Revolution worldwide.
	So I want to thank you for your support.
	I want to encourage you again.
	Go to InfoWarsStore.com for whatever the product is you need.
	We have thousands of them and it makes this all possible.
	Thank you for making InfoWars possible.
	God bless you.
	InfoWars Life is bringing you a breakthrough in modern medicine.
	Introducing Pollen Block.
	We have found an extraordinary new, natural way to alleviate seasonal distress symptoms, including promoting clear nasal and sinus passageways, eye comfort, and respiratory function.
	In the 1960s, researchers in France noticed that people who ate certain quail eggs experienced less seasonal immune and inflammatory responses.
	They began studying this effect in published trials, and decades later, we now have the fruit of this research, a fast-acting, chewable tablet that helps alleviate seasonal distress symptoms.
	Pollen block is natural and effective.
	It is not an antihistamine.
	In fact, current research has found that it actually acts by blocking the activity of tryptase, Which is an enzyme that amplifies immune and inflammatory responses in the body.
	Go outside and enjoy the air you breathe.
	Head to Infowarslife.com and grab a pack of our Pollen Block Chewable Tablets.
	BrainForce Plus is a top-tier nootropin.
	Focus.
	Clarity.
	Energy.
	But instead of having a 7x markup, we have a 150% markup.
	Right now, it's massively discounted.
	And when you get a bottle of it at 25% off, you get a free bottle of what is our total bestseller.
	It's not very profitable because we give it at such a low price, but it's amazing.
	And that, of course, is knockout, the ultimate sleep aid.
	So we've got a way to energize you, ramp you up in a healthy way during the day.
	And put you deep into that restful, healthy sleep at night.
	It's the Brain Force and Knockout Combo Deal.
	25% off Brain Force and a free bottle of Knockout together right now.
	Get the combo and experience both these great products today.
	Take advantage of it and fund the M4.
	M4WarriorsLife.com or M4WarriorsStore.com.
	The Brain Force Plus Knockout Combo right now.
	Get your free bottle today at M4WarriorsStore.com.
	I want to say brain force is great.
	I want to say turbo force is amazing.
	It is.
	But if you took it with fish oil, it's like the fish oil is it.
	The fish oil is better than it.
	And that's an example of what I'm talking about.
	Fish oil is liquid energy.
	Brain, body, heart.
	The cleanest, the best out there.
	You've got the children's.
	You've got the adults.
	You've got the krill oil.
	If you're going to get the full effect, the fish oil and the children's are really strong.
	They don't give you the burpees, but krill oil.
	is the best and it'll give you the damn burps and I'm just sorry you want something like this you don't get stuff for free the krill is hallucinogenic it's so good in my view I'm not making a medical statement here but let me tell you something and I eat five capulets of krill oil before I go to bed I'm seeing Santa Claus that night so your brain is made basically out of what fish oil is so we don't make a big profit off of it but you know as I just obsessed cuz
	whatever the best is we've got I just can't lie to you.
	I just can't do it!
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Oooooooohhhhhh.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Bye.
	Welcome back.
	We're going to continue with Attorney General Barr's statement to the Senate.
	This is the first time that he's come before them.
	And of course, the New York Times and the Washington Post, still working with the Democrats to try to push this phony narrative.
	Remember, this is how this all began.
	You had the intelligence people, so-called intelligence people.
	Not too smart, what they've done.
	There may be some penalties for this.
	We'll have to wait and see if we really have a constitution and any kind of system of laws here in this country.
	It's going to be very instructive to see what happens moving forward with this.
	But he's explaining what happened with it.
	He says, hey, look, we have this report that's come out, typically that's not released to the public.
	Because there weren't any charges that were brought, but I tried to, as far as I could, under the limits of the law, release this and be fully transparent to everybody.
	He started talking about sexy material.
	Not sexy material, he's not talking about the dirty dossier, the filthy fiction that was ghostwritten for Hillary Clinton in the DNC, to try to cover up what they were really doing internally.
	No, it's not sexy material.
	It's 6, the number 6, the letter E. That had to do with material that is put out, protected, because it's part of a grand jury.
	And so they had to redact that.
	He said they had to redact sensitive sources and methods.
	They had to redact things that were continuing prosecutions.
	And they had to redact information about third parties that are not being charged or indicted with anything.
	And then he said, even with that, He said, the public version that we've all seen now, he said less than 10% of that is redacted.
	He said less than 2% of the part that has anything to do with obstruction was redacted.
	And then he said, and then I made available to you, which by the way, Dianne Feinstein could not be bothered to read, the only senator there that's going to be questioning anybody that has read this, the only senator anywhere, Democrat or Republican, that bothered to read this, was Lindsey Graham.
	And so he made it available to six Republicans, House and Senate, six Democrats, House and Senate, and only one Republican in the House and only Lindsey Graham bothered to even look at the new report.
	But as a metric, what A.G.
	Barr said was that as far as the part of the report that related to collusion, he said less than 2% of that was redacted in that less redacted report that nobody cared to read in the Senate.
	So less than two percent that had to do with collusion and he said in terms of obstruction it was less than one-tenth of one percent.
	Now the problem I have with this whole report is that Barr is still putting out unchallenged this nonsense from Mueller about Russia hacking.
	Folks, even if you go with the metrics that's in the Mueller report and understand that this was never investigated.
	They took the word of CrowdStrike, they took the word of other contractors for the DNC and Hillary Clinton, that there had been Russian hacking.
	It had been disproven by William Binney, it had been refuted by Julian Assange and Wikileaks, who had put out the information.
	But they never really did an investigation of that side of it, because they didn't want to expose the lies and the red herrings of Hillary Clinton and the DNC.
	But even with that, they come back and they give you a metric of how many things were done by the Russians in social media, even if that were true.
	It's far less than one-tenth of one percent of what was said on social media.
	Just look at how Facebook and Twitter and Google are skewing everything that you're allowed to see.
	They are the ones who should be investigated for obstruction and collusion and tampering with the election.
	So we're going to get back to that real quickly in just one minute.
	Before we do, real quickly, I want to tell you about the products that we have on sale at InfoWarsStore.com because that's what funds this program.
	We've got a couple of products that we've discounted 25% and if you get them, we throw in a second product for free.
	We have brought back Survival Shield X2 Nascent Iodine, and you can get that 25% off, and if you buy a bottle of Survival Shield X2 Nascent Iodine at 25% off, you also get a bottle of Survival Shield X3 Nascent Iodine for free!
	And similarly, we have Brain Force Plus, our nutraceutical.
	Helps you to focus, helps you to recall.
	That Brain Force Plus is now 25% off.
	And if you get that, you can get a free bottle of Knockout, our all-natural sleep aid.
	In addition, we have 50% off all apparel.
	That's t-shirts, hats, hoodies, all with new and classic designs.
	All that 50% off.
	We have bone broth 50% off.
	And we have $50 off of both the Alexa Pure Breeze, the air filter, Take a look at the specials we have at Infowarsstore.com.
	We really do need and appreciate your support.
	Alright, let's go back and pick up where we left off with AG Barr's statement at the Senate.
	Including the power of using a grand jury and using compulsory process exists for that purpose, the function of the Department of Justice in this arena, which is to determine whether or not there has been criminal conduct.
	It's a binary decision.
	Is there enough evidence to show a crime?
	And do we believe a crime has been committed?
	We don't conduct criminal investigations just to collect information and put it out to the public.
	We do so to make a decision.
	And here we thought there was an additional reason, which is this was a very public investigation.
	And we had made clear that the results of the investigation were going to be made public.
	And the deputy and I felt that the evidence developed by the special counsel was not sufficient to establish that the president committed a crime.
	And therefore it would be irresponsible and unfair for the department to release a report without stating the department's conclusions.
	And thus leave it hanging as to whether the department considered there had been criminal conduct.
	So the Deputy Attorney General and I conducted a careful review of the report with our staffs and legal advisors.
	And while we disagreed with some of the legal theories and felt that many of the episodes discussed in the report would not constitute obstruction as a matter of law, we didn't rest our decision on that.
	We took each of the ten episodes and we assessed them against the analytical framework that had been set forth by the special counsel.
	And we concluded that the evidence developed during the special counsel's investigation was not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction of justice offense.
	Let me just talk a little bit about this March 24th letter and Bob Mueller's letter, I think, which I received on the 28th.
	When the report came in on the 22nd and we saw it was going to take a great deal of time to get it out to the public, I made the determination that we had to put out some information about the bottom line.
	The body politic was in a high state of agitation.
	There was massive interest in learning what the bottom line results of Bob Mueller's investigation was, particularly as to collusion.
	Former government officials were confidently predicting that the president and members of his family were going to be indicted.
	There were people suggesting that if it took any time to turn around the report and get it out, it would mean that the president was in legal jeopardy.
	So I didn't feel that it was in the public interest to allow this to go on for several weeks without saying anything.
	And so I decided to simply state what the bottom line conclusions were.
	Which is what the department normally does, make a binary determination.
	Is there a crime or isn't there a crime?
	We prepared the letter for that purpose to state the bottom line conclusions.
	We use the language from the report to state those bottom line conclusions.
	I analogize it to Announcing after an extended trial what the verdict of the trial is.
	Pending release of the full transcript.
	That's what we were trying to do.
	Notify the people as to the bottom line conclusion.
	We were not trying to summarize the 410 page report.
	So we released that.
	I offered Bob Mueller the opportunity to review that letter before it went out and he declined.
	Um...
	Very important.
	He offered for him to review it, but he declined.
	On Thursday morning, I received, it probably was received at the department Wednesday night or evening, but on Thursday morning I received a letter from Bob, the letter that's just been put into the record.
	And I called Bob and He said, what's the issue here?
	And I asked him if he was suggesting that the March 24th letter was inaccurate.
	And he said no, but that the press reporting had been inaccurate.
	And that the press was reading too much into it.
	And I asked him specifically what his concern was.
	And he said that his concern focused on his explanation of why he did not reach a conclusion on obstruction.
	And he wanted more put out on that issue.
	He argued for putting out summaries of each volume, the executive summaries that had been written by his office.
	And if not that, then other material that focused on the issue of why he didn't reach the obstruction question.
	All right, we have to hold that there.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back with more of A.G.
	Barr's statement.
	Again, you heard him say he offered to let Mueller take a look at it.
	Mueller declined to look at it.
	He said we wanted to get this out because there was a lot of allegations that if there was a delay in the turnout of this conclusion that Trump was trying to cover it up.
	He said it wasn't intended to summarize it, but to notify the public of the conclusion.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, Alec, I just have to say something, man.
	It seems like every time I turn on your broadcast, you're bragging.
	It just gets old, man.
	I'm gonna shut you down right now, okay?
	We're taking calls about your nomination.
	Do you understand they're having congressional hearings trying to shut us down?
	Do you understand I'm ringing the alarm?
	If that was happening to anybody else, I'd be freaked out.
	I mean, what's it gonna take?
	Us being shut down?
	Is that what you want, Frank?
	You know what, Alex?
	Put him on pause again.
	Hey, Frank!
	Do you understand it's not bragging to say, we are the tip of the spear, we're under attack, we need your help.
	As much begging as I do, we can barely pay the bills and grow in the face of this.
	I'm not gonna just stop growth and let them start pushing us backwards.
	You understand?
	I need your help, Frank!
	I need your help, Frank!
	Go to Infowarsstore.com right now and help fund the InfoWars.
	Do you understand?
	I need your help, Frank!
	Free Press needs your help, Frank!
	Defeat the globalists.
	Hashtag Alex Jones.
	Defeat the pedophiles.
	Hashtag Alex Jones.
	Defeat Alexandra Cortez and her mindless idiocy with hashtag Alex Jones.
	Defeat the censors with hashtag Alex Jones.
	They've tried to ban us off every platform out there but we've just gotten stronger because you've taken action with hashtag Alex Jones.
	I am patient zero in the massive banning.
	But you can override the censors now, and if all of our audience gets involved with hashtag Alex Jones, we are unstoppable together.
	We've already changed the world together with our laser focus.
	Do it again with hashtag Alex Jones on Twitter, on Facebook, on Google, on YouTube, everywhere.
	Call or talk radio, C-SPAN, shout it out loud in public.
	Hashtag Alex Jones.
	That's the rallying cry to restore the First Amendment.
	and the dynamic human spirit that refuses to submit.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	David Knight Show.
	you you Liberty, it's your move.
	And now, the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	Welcome back.
	We're covering Attorney General Barr's statement to the Senate.
	And of course, we have to take commercial breaks, but you're not losing anything.
	We've got this queued up on TiVo, or the equivalent.
	And so we're going to pick right back up where we were in just one second.
	Just to recoup this for people who are joining us, he is pointing out at this moment that he offered Bob Mueller to let Bob Mueller see his statement, his four-page summary.
	He said, I had to make that summary.
	Because there was this push and speculation that was being pushed through the press that the President and his family were going to be indicted under certain charges.
	He said the public needed to be notified of the conclusion.
	It wasn't his intention to summarize that report in four pages, but he said they needed to be notified of that.
	But of course, that was the whole point, wasn't it?
	I mean, you know, the Democrats were running this thing because President Trump was guilty by innuendo.
	He was guilty by slander.
	This is why you have so many people on the Democrat side and the establishment press saying, well, he wasn't exonerated.
	Well, that's not the standard in an investigation.
	In America, you're supposed to be presumed innocent.
	You don't get declared exonerated.
	You get declared not guilty.
	So there's a presumption of innocence and they have to prove that you're guilty.
	And they either say you're guilty or not guilty.
	You don't get exonerated.
	You don't get declared innocent.
	You have the presumption of innocence.
	And so that's what he was trying to do.
	As he pointed out, he's been very open with this.
	This latest report that he released to the Senate that was less redacted, he said there was less than two percent of the report that talked about collusion that was redacted.
	There was less than one-tenth of one percent that talked about obstruction.
	Because that's where they're trying to focus now.
	Less than one-tenth of one percent was redacted.
	Nevertheless, Dianne Feinstein, other senators who were offered to see this, they offered it to six Democrats, six Republicans.
	The only senator who looked at it was Lindsey Graham.
	So, but we had Dianne Feinstein pontificating about this.
	We spared you having to hear that.
	And we're going to go back to what Attorney General Barr is saying now, because now what he's talking about is the fact that Bob Mueller did not say that the report was inaccurate.
	He just said he would like to clarify some of the conclusions that they had, and of course this conclusion that Russia hacked has been thoroughly disproven.
	That never really was.
	Authentically investigated by the Mueller Report.
	You don't have Attorney General Barr pushing back against anything that Bob Mueller said.
	He just left open the obstruction situation.
	He said, well, you know, Rosenstein and I looked at this and we feel like we needed to come to a conclusion here on this because the American public needed it.
	We said that the president did not try to assert executive privilege even though he had the right to.
	There was no effort by the president to stop any of this stuff.
	So we said there was no obstruction.
	There was no crime, quite frankly, either.
	That's the most important point.
	But here is Attorney General Barr.
	We'll pick up his comments where he left off.
	He's talking about Bob Mueller's reaction to this in advance.
	I told Bob that I was not interested in putting out summaries and I wasn't going to put out the report piecemeal.
	Thank you.
	I wanted to get the whole report out.
	And I thought summaries by very definition, regardless of who prepared them, would be under-inclusive and we'd have sort of a series of different debates and public discord over each tranche of information that went out and I wanted to get everything out at once and we should start working on that.
	And so the following day I put out a letter explaining the process we were following and stressing That the March 24th letter was not a summary of the report, but a statement of the principal conclusions.
	And that people would be able to see Bob Mueller's entire thinking when the report was made public.
	So I'll end my statement there, Mr. Chairman, and glad to take any questions.
	Thank you very much.
	As to the actual report itself, was there ever an occasion where You wanted to, something was redacted from the report that Mr. Mueller objected to.
	I wouldn't say objected to.
	My understanding is the categories were defined by me.
	Infowarsstore.com is how you support us.
	And it's not like we're selling stuff you don't need, you don't want.
	The air in the average American home is filled with toxins that put it on par with a major city.
	Some of the most polluted areas on earth are major cities.
	How can I solve that problem?
	So we have air filters at InfowarsStore.com, the Alexa Pure Breeze, which is right now $50 off the Alexa Pure Breeze groundbreaking ion cluster air filter technology, and we've got a limited quantity of these left right now.
	We're basically selling these at cost because there was a big overhaul Go ahead and read the hundreds of five-star reviews for yourself.
	I've got two in my home.
	You will notice the difference, ladies and gentlemen, with the Alexa Pure Breeze in your house.
	Don't live in a polluted major city in your home.
	Have clean air.
	Go to Infowarsstore.com.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	And now, the David Night Show.
	Welcome back, we've been playing for you Attorney General Barr's statement before the Senate.
	I'm not.
	We're playing bits and pieces of it as we go through.
	We're going to go back and join where we just had to cut it for the brief commercial break.
	Here's Attorney General Barr.
	He's now made his statement.
	He was asked a question by Lindsey Graham who said, did Mueller object to anything that was redacted?
	Was there ever an occasion where you wanted to, something was redacted from the report that Mr. Mueller objected to?
	I wouldn't say objected to.
	My understanding is the categories were defined by me and the deputy.
	I don't think that... I have no... I don't believe... Did you work with him to redact the report?
	Right.
	Those categories were executed by DOJ lawyers working with his lawyers.
	I think there may be a few judgment calls, very few, as to whether or not something as a prudential matter should be treated as a reputational interest or something.
	So there may have been some occasions of that, but as far as I'm aware... As I understand it, you did not want to hurt somebody's reputation unless it really affected the outcome, is that correct?
	Right.
	So, was there any disagreement about 6E material?
	Not that I'm aware of.
	Any disagreement about classified information?
	Not that I'm aware of.
	Okay.
	So, the conclusions in your four-page summary, you think, accurately reflect his bottom line on collusion.
	Is that correct?
	Yes.
	And you can read it for yourself if you've got any doubt.
	None of them bothered to.
	Were you surprised he was going to let you decide?
	Yes, I was surprised.
	I think the function he was carrying out, the investigative and prosecutive function, is performed for the purpose of... How many people did he actually indict, do you know?
	I can't remember off the top of my head.
	It was a lot.
	So he actually has the ability to indict if he wants to.
	He's used that power during the investigation, is that correct?
	That's correct.
	And the other thing that was confusing to me is that the investigation carried on for a while as additional episodes were looked into, episodes involving the president.
	And so my question is, or was, why were those investigated if at the end of the day you weren't going to reach a decision on them?
	So did you consult Attorney General Rosenstein about the obstruction matter?
	Constantly, yeah.
	So, was he in agreement with your decision not to proceed forward?
	Yes.
	I'm sorry, the agreement what?
	Not to proceed forward about obstruction.
	Right.
	So, very quickly, give us your reasoning why you think it would be inappropriate to proceed forward on obstruction of justice in this case.
	Well, generally speaking, an obstruction case typically has two aspects to it.
	One, there's usually an underlying criminality.
	Let's stop right there.
	Was there an underlying crime here?
	No.
	So usually there is.
	Usually.
	But it's not necessary.
	The paradigmatic case is there's an underlying crime.
	And then the person implicated, or people implicated, concerned about that criminality being discovered, take an inherently malignant act, as the Supreme Court has said, to obstruct that investigation.
	Such as destroying documents.
	People were worried about that he fired Comey.
	To stop the Russian investigation.
	That's one of the concerns people had.
	Let me tell you a little bit about Comey.
	I do not have confidence in Graham Comey any longer.
	That was Chuck Schumer, November the 2nd, 2016.
	I think he, Comey, should take a hard look at what he has done.
	And I think it would not be a bad thing for the American people if he did step down, Bernie Sanders, January the 15th, 2017.
	The President ought to fire Comey immediately.
	And he ought to initiate an investigation.
	That is Congressman Nadler, November the 14th, 2016.
	Did you have a problem with the way Comey handled the Clinton email investigation?
	Yes, I said so at the time.
	Okay.
	So, given the fact that a lot of people call me should be fired, did you find that to be a persuasive act of obstructing justice?
	No, I think even the report at the end of the day came to the conclusion, if you read the analysis, that a reason that loomed large there for his termination was his refusal to tell the public what he was privately telling the President, which was that the President was not under investigation.
	As to where we go forward, as to how we go forward, would you recommend that this committee and every other committee of Congress do our best to harden our infrastructure against future Russian attacks?
	Absolutely, yes.
	Do you think Russia is still up to it?
	Yes.
	Do you think other countries may get involved in our elections in 2020?
	Yes.
	How about social media?
	Do you think they might get involved?
	How about Google?
	Do you think they're a bigger threat?
	Yes.
	Is that one of the takeaways of the Mueller report?
	Yes.
	Do you share my concerns about the FISA warrant process?
	Yes.
	Do you share my concerns about the counterintelligence investigation?
	Social media was supposed to be how the Russians overthrew our election, but who learns social media?
	Do you share my concerns that the lack of professionalism in the Clinton email investigation is something we should all look at?
	Yes.
	Do you expect to change your mind about the bottom line conclusions of the Mueller report?
	No.
	Do you know Bob Mueller?
	Yes.
	Do you trust him?
	Yes.
	How long have you known him?
	30 years, roughly.
	Do you think he had the time he needed?
	Yes.
	Do you think he had the money he needed?
	Yes.
	Do you think he had the resources he needed?
	Yes.
	Do you think he did a thorough job?
	Yes, and I think he feels he did a thorough job and had adequate evidence to make the calls.
	Do you think the President's campaign in 2016 was thoroughly looked at in terms of whether or not they colluded with the Russians?
	Yes.
	And the answer is no, according to Bob Mueller.
	That's right.
	He couldn't decide about obstruction.
	You did.
	Is that correct?
	That's right.
	You feel good about your decision?
	Absolutely.
	Thank you very much.
	Senator Bassett.
	Chairman, Mr. Attorney General, the special counsel's report describes how the president directed White House counsel Don McGahn to fire special counsel Mueller, and later told McGahn to write a letter, quote, for our records, end quote, stating that the president had not ordered him to fire Mueller.
	The report also recounts how the President made repeated efforts to get McGahn to change his story.
	Knowing that McGahn believes the president's version of events was false, the special counsel found, and I quote, substantial evidence, end quote, that the president tried to change McGahn's account in order to prevent further scrutiny of the president towards the investigation.
	Special counsel also found that McGahn is a credible witness with no motive to lie or exaggerate given the position he held in the White House.
	Here's the question.
	Does existing law prohibit efforts to get a witness to lie to say something the witness believes is false?
	Yes.
	Lie to the government, yes.
	And what law is that?
	Obstruction statutes.
	The obstruction statute.
	And you don't have it, I guess, before you?
	Well, I'm not sure which one they were referring to here.
	It was probably 1512c2.
	1512 c2. So these things in effect constitute obstruction?
	Well you're talking in general terms.
	You're not talking... What I'm talking about specifically, yes, you're correct in a sense.
	Alright, gotta take a break.
	We're gonna be right back with questioning.
	Diane Feinstein is questioning Attorney General Barr.
	Again, he released a less redacted report, which has less than one-tenth of one percent about obstruction that is redacted.
	She didn't bother to read it, but she's gonna question him nevertheless.
	We'll have that when we come back.
	Stay with us.
	You're on the air worldwide, Stacey.
	Good to talk to you.
	Before I get into what I want to say, I just want to let you know that I don't normally take vitamins at all.
	I was turned on to the ultimate female force.
	I looked at all the ingredients and they're all organic, root, things like that, that I trust.
	You know, because I've seen a lot of other vitamins that don't have things that they say that they have in them, and they're often not things that are natural.
	I appreciate that.
	Well, what happened with Ultimate Female Force?
	Tell us about it.
	Well, it's really great.
	You know, it's like a multivitamin.
	I take it.
	It tastes good.
	It doesn't have that nasty aftertaste.
	It actually has kind of a pleasant aftertaste.
	And, you know, it just gives me energy and fuels me throughout the day, so I really like it.
	Well, just so you know, we look at whatever the best herbs are.
	They're known to turbocharge women.
	And then we get the organic ones and put it in it.
	So yeah, stamina, libido, energy.
	These are amazing things and ultimate female force.
	So I'm glad you plugged it.
	Infowarsstore.com or 888-253-3139.
	I've been doing a lot of research into Google and YouTube censorship, and I've noticed that there's one type of video that is the most censored, the most buried, the most suppressed.
	And that's the videos where you saw in 2016 election night, all the arrogant leftist authoritarians, like the Young Turks and others, get so butthurt when Trump won.
	They don't want us to have that victory.
	They don't want us to remember what political action did.
	And that's why the globalists, Hillary and others, are trying to shut InfoWars down.
	This is a fight about taking your speech away, not just my speech.
	About taking your very sovereignty away.
	This country is in a war!
	So again, I want to thank you for what you've done, but I want to remind you, if you don't spread the articles and videos, and if you don't financially get the great products we have and fund us, and the 360 win, we're dead in the water.
	I'm in your hands, you're in my hands, InfoWarsStore.com, thank you!
	We all know the importance of fish oils.
	While we are sure to provide them for ourselves, it's just as important to make sure your kids get their EPA and DHA too.
	Honor Roll is a powerful DHA fish oil formula for your child, built from the ground up to support your child's development.
	This formula uses wild anchovy fish oil, ultra-purified krill oil, and wild salmon fish oil with vitamins to boost your child's mind and body.
	With this fish oil formula, you can support your child's optimal heart, joint, cognitive, and brain health while providing DHA.
	Which has been shown to be essential for your child's brain growth spurts.
	Built on powerful ingredients with 580 milligrams of high DHA omega-3s, this formula is highly refined to eliminate nearly all heavy metals.
	If you're looking for a formula to help your child grow, look no further.
	Try Honor Roll from InfoWars Life at InfoWarsStore.com.
	Brain Force Plus is a top-tier nootropic.
	Focus.
	Clarity.
	Energy.
	But instead of having a 7x markup, we have a 150% markup.
	Right now, it's massively discounted.
	And when you get a bottle of it at 25% off, you get a free bottle of what is our total bestseller.
	It's not very profitable because we give it at such a low price, but it's amazing.
	And that, of course, is Knockout, the ultimate sleep aid.
	So we've got a way to energize you, ramp you up in a healthy way during the day and put you deep into that restful, healthy sleep at night.
	It's the Brain Force and Knockout combo deal.
	25% off Brain Force and a free bottle of Knockout together right now.
	Get the combo and experience.
	Both these great products today.
	Take advantage of it and fund the M4.
	M4WarriorsLife.com or M4WarriorsStore.com.
	The Brain Force Plus Knockout Combo right now.
	Get your free bottle today at InfoWareStore.com.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Get your free bottle today at InfoWareStore.com.
	Get your free bottle today at InfoWareStore.com.
	Welcome back!
	We're going to join the Bar Brawl in the Senate as Attorney General Barr now being questioned by Dianne Feinstein, who didn't care enough to read the nearly totally unredacted report because it was only less than one-tenth of one percent of the report that was redacted concerning obstruction.
	That's what they're trying to make this an issue of.
	Less than one-tenth of one percent.
	Was redacted, he made that available to people on this Senate committee hearing.
	The only one who bothered to read it was Lindsey Graham.
	Dianne Feinstein was included, one of the people that could read this, but she didn't.
	As you heard Lindsey Graham talking about this, he read statements from Schumer, Sanders, and Nadler, people who are key in terms of, key pushers in terms of saying, we've got to impeach President Trump because the firing of Comey constituted obstruction.
	And yet he read quotes from Schumer, Sanders, and Nadler who were saying Trump needs to fire Comey before he did it.
	And so now we've got Dianne Feinstein questioning Attorney General Barr.
	He said again that one of the reasons, key reasons, why Comey was fired was because he kept telling the President privately, you're not under investigation, but he wouldn't say that to the American people.
	He was implying that he was under investigation.
	See, that's what this is all about.
	It's about continuing the innuendo and the slander when they knew that they didn't have a case.
	Fundamentally dishonest.
	And now the Democrats are doing the same thing.
	They're continuing all of this, even after the Mueller report, knowing that there was no collusion, no crime, no obstruction.
	They're still trying to continue this.
	And here's the questioning from Dianne Feinstein of Attorney General Barr.
	In order to prevent, and this is a quote, further scrutiny of the president toward the investigation.
	And quote, the special counsel also found McGahn is a credible witness with no motive to lie or exaggerate.
	So what I'm asking you then, is that a credible charge under the obstruction statute?
	We felt that that episode the government would not be able to establish obstruction.
	If you go back and if you look at the The episode where the president gave McGahn an instruction.
	McGahn's version of that is quite clear, and each time he gave it, which is that the instruction said, go to Rosenstein, raise the issue of conflict of interest.
	And Mueller has to go because of this conflict of interest.
	So there's no question that whatever instruction I was giving McGahn had to do with Mueller's conflict of interest.
	The president later said that what he meant was that the conflict of interest should be raised with Rosenstein, but the decision should be left with Rosenstein.
	On the other end of the spectrum, it appears that McGahn felt it was more directive, and that the president was essentially saying, push Rosenstein to invoke a conflict of interest to push Mueller out.
	Wherever it fell on that spectrum of interest, the New York Times story was very different.
	The New York Times story said flat out that the president directed the firing of Mueller.
	He told McGahn, fire Mueller.
	Now, there's something very different between firing a special counsel outright, which suggests ending the investigation, and having a special counsel removed for conflict, which suggests that you're going to have another special counsel.
	They all had topics.
	Even under McGann's, and then as the report says and recognizes, there is evidence the president truly felt that the Times article was inaccurate and he wanted McGann to correct it.
	So we believe that it would be impossible for the government to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the president Understood that he was instructing McGahn to say something false, because it wasn't necessarily false.
	Moreover, McGahn had, weeks before, already given testimony to the special counsel, and the president was aware of that.
	And as the report indicates, it could also have been the case that he was primarily concerned about press reports and making it clear that he never outright directed the firing of Mueller.
	So, in terms of the request to ask McGahn to memorialize that fact, we do not think, in this case, that the government could show corrupt intent beyond a reasonable doubt.
	Just to finish this, but you still have a situation where a president essentially tries to change The lawyers account in order to prevent further criticism of himself.
	Well, that's not a crime.
	Maybe she should read the report.
	She's speechless.
	In this situation, instruct someone to lie?
	No, it has to be, well, to be obstruction of justice, the lie has to be tied to impairing the evidence in a particular proceeding.
	McGahn had already given his evidence, and I think it would be...
	It's plausible that the purpose of McGahn memorializing what the president was asking was to make the record that the president never directed him to fire.
	And there is a distinction between saying to someone, go fire him, go fire Mueller, and saying, have him removed based on conflict.
	They have different results.
	What would that conflict be?
	Well, the difference between them is if you remove someone for a conflict of interest, then there'd be another, presumably another person appointed.
	Diane, you need to do your homework.
	You should have read that report last night.
	...situation, an identifiable conflict that made sense, or else doesn't it just become a fabrication?
	Well, now we're going to shift from the issue of writing the memo or somehow putting out a release later on and the issue of the actual direction to McGahn.
	So the question on the direction to McGahn Has a number of different levels to it.
	And first, as a matter of law, I think the department's position would be that the president can direct the termination or the replacement of a special counsel.
	And as a matter of law, the obstruction statute does not reach that conduct.
	Putting that aside, the next question would be, Even if it reached the conduct, could you here establish corrupt intent beyond a reasonable doubt?
	What makes this case very interesting is that when you take away the fact that there were no underlying criminal conduct, And you take away the fact that there was no inherently malign, obstructive act.
	That is, the president was carrying out his constitutional duties.
	The question is, what is the impact of taking away the underlying crime?
	Alright, we're going to have more of that.
	This is interesting.
	As the report suggests, we want to impact it, but we have to find some other reason why.
	And as William Barr was saying, it's perfectly within the power of the President to get rid of a special counsel.
	You know, if we go back historically, with the exception of Bill Clinton and this particular case, almost all the time in history, special counsels have worked for the President to investigate a corrupt Department of Justice.
	Maybe we should go back to that example.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Infowarsstore.com is how you support us, and it's not like we're selling stuff you don't need, you don't want.
	The air in the average American home is filled with toxins that put it on par with a major city.
	Some of the most polluted areas on earth are major cities.
	How can I solve that problem?
	So we have air filters at Infowarsstore.com, the Alexa Pure Breeze, which is right now $50 off.
	The Alexa Pure Breeze Groundbreaking Ion Cluster Air Filter Technology.
	And we've got a limited quantity of these left right now.
	We're basically selling these at cost because there was a big overhaul.
	Go ahead and read the hundreds of five-star reviews for yourself.
	I've got two in my home.
	You will notice the difference, ladies and gentlemen, with the Alexa Pure Breeze in your house.
	Don't live In a polluted major city, in your home, have clean air.
	Go to InfoWarsStore.com It's time to show them what a real alpha male looks like with one of our most powerful products ever made, Alpha Power.
	As you age, your body can lose testosterone over time.
	With the incredible ingredients in this formula, we can help you beat the test of time and assist in restoring that lost energy and mood that comes with time and age.
	Alpha Power's incredible ingredients can help you boost your sports performance or enhance your day-to-day life with eat while encouraging hormonal balance.
	Perfect by itself or with super male vitality in the True Alpha Male Pack.
	Alpha Power can help boost performance, help maintain normal testosterone levels, support healthy cholesterol and more.
	Let Alpha Power help bring you to the peak of your optimal health.
	Don't fall short on energy in the fight against tyranny.
	Show the world what a True Alpha Male looks like today with Alpha Power.
	Head to Infowarsstore.com today.
	Our grandparents, great grandparents, they canned food.
	During the fall, so they'd have it during the winter.
	And that's what I'm talking about at InfoWarsTour.com.
	With InfoWars Select, it's the full spectrum of my Patriot Supply, one of the top Most respected companies out there.
	But because I private label it, I'm able to go below cost on contracts that all their other distributors aren't able to do.
	But I want to be a market leader, and I want you to have storable food, so it's a total win-win.
	We have those incredible sell prices back.
	MForwardStore.com on M Forward Select storable foods.
	They've got special diet foods.
	They've got three-month supplies, year's supplies, week emergency supplies.
	They've got so many great products there.
	Maybe you've got a three-year supply.
	If stuff happens, you can feed your whole block.
	It's up to us to be self-sufficient.
	You're buying War Bonds, bringing great products, and together, with God's help, we are unstoppable.
	InfoWareStore.com and InfoWare Select, high-quality, storable foods powered by my Patriot Supply.
	I want to salute and commend every man, woman, and child that has supported this broadcast over the years and that has stood with us.
	And I want to thank all of our sponsors and all of our affiliates.
	But I'll tell you like it is.
	You've seen the unmitigated attack we've been under.
	You're our only sponsors.
	And when you don't buy the products that are absolutely the best out there, we aren't able to continue on.
	So remember, you are the info war.
	I'm not the leader, you are the leader.
	When you take action, nothing stops you.
	We've got giant specials running right now at InfoWarsStore.com that are unprecedented.
	And if you go there and buy great products that you already need from across the board, it funds the second American Revolution worldwide.
	So I want to thank you for your support, and I want to encourage you again.
	Go to InfoWarsStore.com for whatever the product is you need.
	We have thousands of them, and it makes this all possible.
	Thank you for making InfoWars possible.
	God bless you.
	God bless you.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	It's The David Night Show.
	Welcome back.
	We're going to continue with Attorney General Barr being questioned by Dianne Feinstein, who clearly is out of her depth, uninformed.
	She didn't bother to read the report that he made available to them.
	They're all worried about obstruction, and as he pointed out, less than one-tenth of one percent.
	of the redactions have to do with obstruction.
	So basically everything that she needs to know about obstruction is there, but she's going through this exercise anyway.
	And I think even though all this stuff has been talked about here and on InfoWars for a couple years, I think it's important for us to continue to look at this back and forth.
	Because there's interesting revelations here about corruption and hypocrisy in the intelligence bureaucracy there.
	Also, how they colluded and continue to collude with mainstream press, New York Times, Washington Post, the collusion between the intelligence community, that bureaucracy, and politics, you know, Democrats and New York Times, Washington Post, and also collusion between our own intelligence community and foreign intelligence communities.
	To overthrow our election.
	That's a very important part about this.
	But also to see how politicized this intelligence bureaucracy is.
	Folks, they had no problem with James Clapper lying to you under oath to cover up his crimes to do dragnet surveillance on the American people.
	But when they used it against the President, that emboldened them because they got away with that.
	Didn't even come after him for perjury.
	That was clear.
	After the Snowden leaks.
	But they got away with all that.
	And now the question is, are they going to get away with this?
	When I hear Lindsey Graham pushing with A.G.
	Barr.
	Remember, A.G.
	Barr was George H.W.
	Bush's Attorney General.
	And when I hear the two of them continuing to push this phony narrative about how destructive Russian attempts to intervene in our election were because they put up a few ads on Facebook.
	We look at the massive Manipulation of the election by Facebook and Google?
	I mean, what hypocrisy that is!
	That tells me two things.
	It tells me, number one, at the very worst, they may have a couple of sacrificial intelligence officials that get prosecuted for this.
	I seriously even doubt that.
	But, even if they prosecute them, they're putting out a narrative talking about how dangerous the cyber threats are to our democracy.
	So therefore, what do we need?
	We need more of the intelligence bureaucracy.
	Expect that cancer to metastasize and grow throughout our society, because that's the narrative that they're pushing.
	So I don't see the fundamental bureaucracy, the fundamental position here being attacked whatsoever.
	There may be some high-profile people that get punished or slapped on the wrist, but we'll have to wait and see about even that.
	But let's go back to the back and forth, the hypocrisy, the collusion of Dianne Feinstein With the intelligence bureaucracy, with the mainstream press, the New York Times, Washington Post, and this back and forth.
	Let's go back to her questioning of Attorney General Barr.
	That the accusations against him were false.
	And he knew they were false.
	And he felt that this investigation was unfair, propelled by his political opponents, and was hampering his ability to govern.
	That is not a corrupt motive for replacing an independent counsel.
	So that's another reason that we would say that the government would have difficulty proving this beyond a reasonable doubt.
	Boy, she's relieved.
	Her time is up.
	She finally gets off the hot spot because she has nothing to say.
	She doesn't understand this.
	About text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page that appear to show the FBI may have tried to use counterintelligence briefings for the Trump transition team as intelligence gathering operations.
	I hope you will commit to answering the letter in writing, but also providing committees the requested briefing.
	That's my question.
	Yes, Senator.
	Have you already tasked any staff to look into whether spying by the FBI and other agencies on the Trump campaign was properly predicated?
	And can Congress expect a formal report on your findings?
	Yes, I do have people in the department helping me review the activities over the summer of 2016.
	I suppose it depends on what conclusions you come to, but is there any reason why Congress wouldn't be briefed on your conclusions?
	It's a little early for me to commit completely, but I envision some kind of reporting at the end of this.
	The Clinton campaign and the Democrat National Committee hired Fusion GPS to do opposition research against candidate Trump.
	Fusion GPS then hired Christopher Steele, former British intelligence officer, to compile what we all know as the Steele dossier.
	That reportedly used Russian government sources for information.
	The Steele dossier was central to the now debunked collusion narrative.
	Now, here's the irony.
	The Mueller report spent millions investigating and found no collusion between Trump campaign and Russia.
	But the Democrats paid for a document created by a foreign national with reported foreign government sources.
	Not Trump, but the Democrats.
	That's the definition of collusion.
	Despite the central status Of the Steele dossier to the collusion narrative, the Mueller report failed to analyze whether the dossier was filled with disinformation to mislead U.S.
	intelligence agencies and the FBI.
	My question, Mueller spent over two years, $30 million, investigating Russian interference in the election.
	In order for a full accounting of Russian interference attempts, shouldn't the special counsel have considered on whether the Steele dossier was part of a Russian disinformation and interference campaign?
	I don't.
	Should have investigated Ukraine.
	Special Counsel Mueller has put out his report.
	It wasn't an investigation.
	And I have not yet had anyone go through the full scope of his investigation to determine whether he did address or look at all into those issues.
	One of the things I'm doing in my review is to try to assemble all the existing information out there about it.
	Not only from Hill Investigations and the OIG, but also to see what the special counsel looked into.
	So I really couldn't say what he actually looked into.
	But you think, in other words, if you had looked at all that information right now, you're telling me you could have said yes or no to my question?
	If I had looked at it.
	And you're going to attempt to find some of this information if it's available?
	Yes.
	Similarly, shouldn't the special counsel have looked into the origins of the FBI's investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia?
	The origins of that narrative?
	Yes.
	I don't know if he viewed his charter and I don't know whether he did or not.
	That's something that I am reviewing and again we'll look at whatever the special counsel has developed on that.
	In volume two of the report, the special counsel declined to make a traditional prosecutorial decision.
	Instead, the special counsel laid out 200 or so pages relating to a potential obstruction analysis, and then dumped that on your desk.
	In your press conference, you said that you asked the special counsel whether he would have made a charging decision or recommended charges on obstruction, but for the Office of Legal Counsel's opinion on charging sitting presidents, and that the special counsel made clear that was not the case.
	So I'm gonna hold it right there, we're gonna get his answer on the other side of the break.
	You know, when he's talking about the collusion with British intelligence and so on, it's amazing to me that Grassley's staff, who wrote this all out for him, he's having trouble reading it, but it's amazing to me they completely ignore Alexandria Chalupa, the DNC official who had Ukrainian... We've had openly... We've interviewed many people here at InfoWars from the Ukraine talking about how the Democrats are working with Ukrainian government officials in this conspiracy.
	It wasn't an investigation by Mueller.
	It was a cover-up.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Brain Force Plus is a top-tier nootropic.
	Focus.
	Clarity.
	Energy.
	But instead of having a 7x markup, we have a 150% markup.
	Right now, it's massively discounted.
	And when you get a bottle of it at 25% off, you get a free bottle of what is our total bestseller.
	It's not very profitable because we give it at such a low price, but it's amazing.
	And that, of course, is knockout ultimate sleep aid.
	So we've got a way to energize you, ramp you up in a healthy way during the day.
	And put you deep into that restful, healthy sleep at night.
	It's the Brain Force and Knockout Combo Deal.
	25% off Brain Force and a free bottle of Knockout together right now.
	Get the combo and experience both these great products today.
	Take advantage of it and fund the M4.
	M4WarsLife.com or M4WarsStore.com.
	The Brain Force Plus Knockout Combo right now.
	Get your free bottle today at M4WarsStore.com.
	Whether you're looking to boost the benefits of our fish oil formula, or just want an alternative, InfoWars Life has the formula for you.
	Ultimate Krill Oil is a powerhouse formula that takes advantages of the EPA, DHA, and Omega-3s found in our high-quality, ultra-pure krill oil concentrate.
	Containing powerful antioxidants, such as astaxanthin and Omega-3s, Ultimate Krill Oil can help you experience the benefits of fish oil with less required DHA and EPA.
	This incredible formula can help your body in many ways, including supporting heart health, joint health, and cognitive health, aiding and regulating fat metabolism, helping to maintain cognitive function, and more.
	And while other krill oil formulas may chemically modify their formulas, We're giving you the benefits of a simple formula that contains unmodified, high-quality krill oil concentrate.
	Paired with our Ultimate Fish Oil or used separately.
	It's time to see what krill oil can do for you with Ultimate Krill Oil.
	Now available at InfoWarsStore.com.
	Getting your protein has never been easier with InfoWars Life Protein Bars.
	Available in delicious chocolate peanut butter and vanilla coconut flavors, these protein bars are the perfect answer for a snack on the go.
	InfoWars Life Protein Bars are nutrient-packed, portable protein bars for an easy-to-eat and great-tasting meal.
	Pre- or post-workout, fuel alternative.
	At just 240 calories per bar and 15 grams of protein each, these bars will be your favorite at-hand snack for at home, in the car, at work, or on the go.
	For getting nutrients easily, high in fiber and nutrients with wholesome ingredients for high-level performance with great taste, such as whey protein and chocolate compounds.
	These protein bars can help you with the boost you need to reach your goals.
	Protein packed and full of fiber and healthy ingredients, Info Wars Life Protein Bars are a can't miss snack for any Info Warrior serious about their energy.
	Try both flavors today at InfoWarsStore.com We all know that the outside toxins in the water is a serious health issue.
	InfoWars is proud to sell incredible filters, but it's almost impossible to keep up with every faucet, shower, and sink in your home.
	That's why we're bringing you something to provide clean water for your whole house with one system.
	The ProPure Whole House Water Filtration System is an advanced, four-stage, compact filtration system that will Provide water filtration for your entire home, removing 220 plus contaminants from your water.
	It's compact in size, easy to install and maintain, and keeps fluoride and other dangerous toxins out of your water supply and away from you and your family.
	With its broad spectrum contaminant reduction, you'll only need this one filter for clean and refreshing water all over your home.
	Head to InfowarsStore.com and whether it's your first water filtration purchase or you're looking to replace your current rundown systems, it's time to go big and go home with the Pro Pure Whole House Filtration System today.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, we're going to continue with this questioning of Attorney General Barr.
	He made available to the Senate, to six Republicans, six Democrats, nobody really bothered to look at it.
	One Republican in the House and Lindsey Graham read the less redacted report, and we talk about less redacted, when it comes to obstruction, which is the key thing that the Democrats are trying to hang on to.
	As he pointed out, less than one tenth of one percent.
	of the report talking about obstruction was redacted now in this latest revision, but they couldn't be bothered.
	And now we have Senator Grassley, Republican, talking to AG Barr, saying, isn't it ironic that while all this was happening and they were accusing President Trump of colluding with Russians to manipulate the election, you had the Democrats and they had a privately funded dossier?
	It doesn't deserve dossier.
	It's just filthy fiction, folks.
	It's a filthy imagination of people like Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton that they had ghosts written, shopped around by foreign intelligence agencies.
	Isn't it ironic, said Grassley, that this was happening?
	Because this is really kind of... No, no, it's not ironic.
	It's simply corruption.
	And nobody, including Grassley, is talking about the role of officials in the Ukraine.
	But that has been openly talked about.
	So if AG Barr wants to investigate that, go ahead!
	You can start with our broadcast where we talk about that all the time.
	You start with Lee Stranahan who's been totally on that.
	It's absolutely amazing to me how they're pretending we don't know.
	We already know this stuff.
	We're going to go back to it because it's important to see the continued corruption, the continued cover-up of this, the continued way they're trying to spin this so they can metastasize this surveillance state.
	Folks, they created FISA in the first place, again, in the wake of the Frank Church hearings and the Senate looking at how the CIA had become corrupted immediately.
	By the 1960s it was really off the reservation.
	They didn't have any reservations about anything, and neither did the NSA.
	The NSA was created by executive order.
	They wouldn't even show the Pike Committee hearing in the House.
	What the executive order from President Truman was about.
	So I'm not even going to show you what my founding documents say.
	Because you're nothing but a congressman.
	I don't answer to you, I'm the NSA.
	I mean, that's the situation back in the 1960s and early 70s.
	And they were spying on Americans.
	But nobody cares about that.
	And so because nobody cared about that for decades, now they're trying to overthrow our elections as well.
	Why wouldn't they?
	Why wouldn't they come after the President?
	This is institutional corruption.
	It goes far beyond the criminals at the forefront right now, like Brennan and Clapper.
	If they don't do some institutional major changes, we've had it here.
	But we're going to go back to this so that you can see the corruption on display.
	Before we do, real quickly, I just want to remind you of some of the specials we have at InfoWarsTore.com, because that's what funds this broadcast.
	We have a couple of products that you can get at 25% off and then get a free complimentary product.
	For example, we have Survival Shield X2 Nascent Iodine 25% off.
	If you get that, X2 at 25% off, you can get Survival Shield X3 Nascent Iodine for free.
	Likewise, we have 25% off Brain Force Plus.
	That nutraceutical that helps you to focus and to recall.
	Certainly, Grassley and Time Fine so I could use a bottle of that.
	Brain Force Plus, 25% off and you get a free bottle of Knock Out or All Natural Sleep Aid.
	We have 50% off all apparel.
	That's T-shirts, hats, hoodies with new and classic designs.
	And finally, we have $50 off both the Alexa Pure Breeze, that's the air filter, as well as $50 off the Alexa Pure Pro, the water filter.
	Take a look at the specials we have at InfowarsStore.com, folks.
	You are our sponsor.
	If you don't sponsor us, if you don't keep us going, we will not be here.
	Okay, let's go back to the hearing.
	Again, this is Senator Grassley talking to AG Barr.
	He reiterated several times in a group meeting that He was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found obstruction.
	If the Special Counsel found facts sufficient to constitute obstruction of justice, would he have stated that finding?
	If he had found that, then I think he would state it, yes.
	Was it Special Counsel Mueller's responsibility to make a charging recommendation?
	I think the Deputy Attorney General and I thought it was.
	But, not just charging, but to determine whether or not conduct was criminal.
	The President would be charged, could not be charged as long as he was in office.
	Do you agree with the reasons that he offered for not making a decision in Volume 2 of his report?
	And why or why not?
	I'm not really sure of his reasoning.
	I really could not recapitulate his analysis, which is one of the reasons in my March 24th letter I simply stated the fact that he did not reach a conclusion, didn't try to put words in his mouth.
	I think that if he felt that he shouldn't go down the path of making a traditional Prosecutive decision, then he shouldn't have investigated.
	That was the time to pull up.
	Okay.
	There have been a number of leaks coming out of the Justice Department and FBI during high-profile investigations.
	The Inspector General found that during the department's investigation of Hillary Clinton for mishandling highly classified information, there was a culture of unauthorized media contacts.
	During the Ryshin investigation, the leaks continued.
	Leaks undermine the ability of investigators to investigate.
	Further leaks to the papers while Congress's questions to the department go unanswered is unacceptable.
	Why?
	What are you doing to investigate unauthorized media contacts by the department and FBI officials during the Ryshin investigation?
	We have multiple criminal leak investigations underway.
	Thank you.
	Senator Lee?
	Well, let's hope that they do follow through on that.
	Attorney General?
	There should be multiple criminal investigations underway.
	Someone troubled by your testimony here and in the other body.
	You appeared before the House of Corporations on April 9th.
	You were asked about media reports that portrayed the special counsel's team as frustrated that your March 24th letter didn't adequately portray the report's findings.
	When the congressman, I believe it was Congressman Chris, asked if you knew what those members of the special counsel's team were concerned about, you testified in response, no, I don't.
	You then said you merely suspected they would have preferred more information was released with a letter.
	Now we know, contrary to what you said April 9th, that on March 27th, Robert Mueller wrote to you expressing very specific concerns that your March 24th letter, your testimony on April 9th, That your March 24th letter failed to capture the, to quote Mr. Mueller, the context, nature, and substance, close quote of his report.
	And what I, what really struck me, Mr. Mueller wrote that your letter threatened to undermine a central purpose for which the department appointed the special counsel, to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigation.
	Why did you testify on April 9th that you didn't know the concerns being expressed by Mueller's team, when in fact you heard those concerns directly from Mr. Mueller two weeks before?
	Well, as I said...
	I talked directly to Bob Mueller about his letter to me, and specifically asked him, what exactly are your concerns?
	Are you saying that the March 24th letter was misleading or inaccurate, or what?
	He indicated that it was not.
	He was not saying that, and that what he was concerned about... What was my question?
	Well, I'm getting to the question, which is the question from Crist was, Reports have emerged recently, press reports, that members of the special counsel's team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, in that they don't adequately or accurately portray the report's findings.
	I don't know what members he's talking about.
	And I certainly am not aware of any challenge to the accuracy of the findings.
	You seem to have learned the filibuster rules even better than Senators do.
	My question was, why did you say you were not aware of concerns... Again, Leahy was not concerned enough to actually read the... ...and express concerns... That's all the time we have.
	And so we're going to stop it at this point.
	Again, the question is, what are they going to do about the collusion between the Democrats and the Ukrainians?
	What are they going to do about the corruption, the leaks within the Justice Department?
	I'm still waiting to see if there's going to be any indictments.
	Attorney General Barr said they are investigating that.
	Our team is constantly on the lookout for newer and better ways to improve our products.
	That's why we're bringing you a brand new version of one of the newest fan-favorite products, The Real Red Pill Plus.
	The Real Red Pill Plus is an all-new version of the powerhouse preglanone product.
	It features the same great formula that supports your heart, brain, healthy aging process, with an all-new natural caffeine boost included.
	A powerful preglanone base, the Real Red Pill, has quickly become one of our fellow InfoWarriors' favorite products.
	Now, with an extra proprietary energy blend inside, including green tea extract, yerba mate, leaf extract, and more, you can get that extra pick-me-up, all supporting your mind and body in a healthy way.
	It's got all the great stuff that Real Red Pill has.
	It's also got the boost in it.
	Get the Real Red Pill Plus at InfoWarsStore.com Get the Real Red Pill Plus at InfoWarsStore.com I want to say brain force is great.
	I want to say turbo force is amazing.
	It is.
	But if you took it with fish oil, it's like the fish oil is it.
	The fish oil is better than it.
	And that's an example of what I'm talking about.
	Fish oil is liquid energy, brain, body, heart, the cleanest, the best out there.
	You've got the children's, you've got the adults, you've got the grill oil.
	If you're going to get the full effect, the fish oil and the children's are really They don't give you the burpees, but krill oils is the best, and it'll give you the damn burps.
	And I'm sorry.
	You want something like this?
	You don't get stuff for free.
	The krill is hallucinogenic.
	It's so good.
	In my view.
	I'm not making a medical statement here, but let me tell you something.
	When I eat five capulets of krill oil before I go to bed, I'm seeing Santa Claus that night.
	So your brain is made basically out of what fish oil is.
	So, we don't make a big profit off of it, but you notice I just obsess because whatever the best is we've got, I just can't lie to you.
	I just can't do it!

▲